Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 18 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report October 3, 2023 TOPIC: Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project at 1901 and 1971 East Fourth Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive (collectively 1901 East Fourth Street). AGENDA TITLE Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03, appealing the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 2023-01 and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 2023-03 (County Map No. 19243) to facilitate the construction of a mixed -use development known as Cabrillo Town Center at 1901 and 1971 East Fourth Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive (collectively 1901 East Fourth Street) RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution denying Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of two resolutions to approve Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 2023-01 and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 2023-03 (County Map No. 19243) to facilitate the construction of a mixed -use development known as Cabrillo Town Center at 1901 and 1971 East Fourth Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive (collectively 1901 East Fourth Street). GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Andrea Maloney with Sapetto Real Estate Solutions, Inc. and representing Fairfield Realty, LLC. (applicant), on behalf of David A. Colton, trustee of David A. Colton Trust (property owner), is requesting approval of Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 2023-01 and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 2023-03 (for County Map No. 19243) to facilitate the construction of a mixed -use development known as Cabrillo Town Center ("Project") at 1901 and 1971 East Fourth Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive (collectively 1901 East Fourth Street). Pursuant to sections 2.3 and 8.1 the Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone (MEMU), in order to exercise the option to develop a mixed - use project under the MEMU, a SPR application needs to be approved. In addition, pursuant to Section 34-127, approval of a TTM application is required for projects proposing to create four or more parcels. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request due to the project's compliance with the intent of the MEMU by providing a highly quality, mid -rise, mixed -use development within an urban City Council 18 — 1 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 2 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. environment. Moreover, the project meets the intent of the General Plan by promoting a pedestrian -oriented environment and will contribute to the City's housing stock through the production of market -rate ownership and rental housing units, diverse housing product types, and payment of in -lieu affordable housing funds to facilitate the development of affordable housing in Santa Ana. Table 1: Project Location Information and Applicable Code Sections Item Information Project Addresses and Council Ward 1901 and 1971 East Fourth Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive — Ward 3 Nearest Intersection Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive General Plan Designation District Center — Medium DC-3 Zoning Designation Professional P and Village Center District of the MEMU Surrounding Land Uses North Cabrillo Park East Vacant (future Central Pointe Mixed -Use Development site South Medical Offices West Professional and Medical Offices Site Size 8.97 acres 390,733 sq. ft. Existing Site Development The site is currently developed with four offices buildings totaling approximately 87,082 sq. ft. and associated parking and landscape. Applicable Zoning Code Sections Chapters 41 and 34 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and MEMU Entitlements Requested SPR and TTM Planning Commission Action & Background At its regular meeting on April 24, 2023, and after receiving public testimony on the item, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (6-0-0-1 with Ramos absent) to adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 2023-01 and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 2023-03 (County Map No. 19243) to facilitate the construction of a mixed -use development known as Cabrillo Town Center at 1901 East Fourth Street. The Planning Commission modified the conditions of approval to require the applicant to coordinate with the Public Works Agency (PWA) to develop a traffic -calming strategy along Cabrillo Park Drive. Specifically, Condition of Approval No. 19 requires the applicant to coordinate with PWA to develop a traffic -calming strategy when the project reaches 70-percent and 95-percent occupancy, and requires the applicant to implement such strategy when feasible and appropriate as determined by the City. On May 1, 2023, Lozeau Drury, LLP, on behalf of the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER"), submitted an appeal application pursuant to Section 41-645 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) (Exhibit 1) appealing the Planning Commission's approval of SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03. In addition, on May 3, 2023, Mitchell M. Tsai, on behalf of the Southwest Mountains States Carpenters ("SWMSRCC"), also submitted an appeal application pursuant to Section City Council 18 — 2 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 3 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. 41-645 of the SAMC (Exhibit 2) appealing the Planning Commission's approval of SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03. Both appeals filed are based on compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and state that the City should have prepared a project -level environmental impact report (EIR) for the mixed -use development. DISCUSSION Project Description The proposed project includes the demolition of four commercial office buildings on four separate legal parcels in order to facilitate construction of the mixed -use development. The development would consist of two integrated parcels. Parcel 1 will consist of a five - story wrap building with 14,900 square feet of live/work space (19 live/work units), 5,80C square feet of leasable commercial space, 6,100 square feet of leasable office space, 449 residential rental units, 898 parking spaces, and 68,167 square feet of open space and amenities. Parcel 2 will consist of eight 3-story townhome buildings containing a total of 58 residential for sale units, 127 parking spaces, and 18,938 square feet of open space and amenities. In addition, the project as a whole will provide a total of 47,810 square feet (1.10 acres) of publicly accessible open space. Table 2: Project Summary Item Parcel 1 —Apartments Parcel 2 — Townhomes Lot Size 6.23 acres 271,379 sq. ft. 2.74 acres 119,278 sq. ft. Building Square Footage (excluding parking) 539,649 sq. ft. 122,226 sq. ft. Building Height/Stories Five stories 60'-3" in height) Three stories 37'-1" in height) Dwelling Units Per Acre DU/AC 72.1 DU/AC 21.2 DU/AC Floor Area Ratio FAR 1.9 FAR 1.0 FAR Number of Units 449 units rental apartments 58 units for -sale townhomes Number of Studios 23 units 5% None proposed. Bedrooms 1-bedroom 262 units 59% None proposed. Per Unit 2-bedrooms 145 units 32% 12 units 20% 3-bedrooms N/A 34 units 58% 4-bedrooms N/A 12 units (20%) Live/Work 19 units (4%) None proposed. Range of Studios 598 sq. ft. None proposed. Unit Size 1-bedroom 600 — 871 sq. ft. None proposed. 2-bedrooms 1,072 — 1,083 sq. ft. 1,479 sq. ft. 3-bedrooms N/A 1,738 — 1,811 sq. ft. 4-bedrooms N/A 1,927 sq. ft. Live/Work 728— 1,083 sq. ft. None proposed. Commercial Live/Work Space 14,900 sq. ft. None proposed. Square Retail Space 5,800 sq. ft. None proposed. Footage Office Space 6,100 sq. ft. None proposed. Parking 898 spaces (2 per unit) 127 spaces (2.2 per unit) Interior Amenities 5,721 sq. ft. 580 sq. ft. City Council 18 — 3 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 4 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Item Parcel 1 —Apartments Parcel 2 — Townhomes Open Space ace 24,148 s . ft. 9,424 s . ft. =CommonSpace 44,019 s . ft. 9,514 s . ft. Publicly Accessible Open Space 47,810 s . ft. 1.10 acres Site Planning, Circulation and Architecture City staff, the developer, and the architects worked closely to ensure the latest principles in site planning and circulation were incorporated into the project. The project site is broken up by two integrated parcels that provide two distinct housing product types to provide a range of housing options both for rent and sale. The project's defining features are the town center plaza along Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive and adjacent to the proposed commercial space, which will activate the pedestrian experience within the development. In addition, the town center plaza has been designed to provide a passive seating area to be enjoyed by the residents, commercial patrons, and visitors of the development. Vehicular access to the parking structure of Parcel 1 is provided via a right -turn only driveway on Fourth Street and another on Cabrillo Park Drive. In addition, a paseo/service lane along the east property line of Parcel 1 will serve as an access lane for emergency vehicles and trash services but will also provide access to a proposed "move -in" area. The applicant is currently working with the adjacent property owner to the east to finalize an agreement for a sight triangle easement for this area. Vehicular access to Parcel 2 is provided via a driveway on Parkcourt Place (which is proposed as a private street) which has been designed to comply with City standards for future expansion to connect to Sixth Street. The Parcel 1 wrap building has been designed to feature a contemporary architectural style, comparable to current mixed -use residential development communities under construction in in the City and the region. The overall design, massing, features, and materials of the building will be compatible with, but differentiated from, the existing development in the neighborhood, including the anticipated Central Pointe Mixed -Use Development to the west, which is entitled and currently in plan check. The contemporary architectural style will include a muted and earth -toned color palette, with high contrast accent colors, a light sand stucco exterior, fiber cement panel siding, metal railings, aluminum storefronts, brick veneer, metal canopies, and high quality architectural detailing (e.g., exterior lighting, entry doors, fenestration, etc.). Moreover, all building elevations are architecturally detailed and designed to be pedestrian - oriented and activating. Overall, the project will include solid construction materials that will ensure that the project ages well for the duration of the building's lifetime. The Parcel 2 townhouse buildings also feature a contemporary architectural style. The overall design, massing, features, and materials of the buildings will be compatible with, but differentiated from, the multi -family portion of the project. The contemporary architectural style will include fiber cement lap siding, brick veneer, a light sand finish City Council 18 — 4 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 5 stucco exterior, vinyl windows, high quality building trim, metal railings, and high quality architectural detailing (e.g., exterior lighting, entry doors, fenestration, etc.). Moreover, the structures are designed to fully screen all mechanical equipment within the structure and parapet walls. These buildings will also include solid construction materials that will ensure that the project ages well for the duration of the building's lifetime. Commercial Components Parcel 1 will contain all of the 26,800 square feet of the commercial space. The commercial space will provide 14,900 square feet of live/work space, 5,800 square feet of retail leasable space, and 6,100 square feet of leasable office space. The commercial space and leasing office will be provided on the ground floor, along Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. The commercial areas have been designed to accommodate a range of uses common within mixed -use structures, such as cafes, small size retail, and neighborhood service uses. The 19 live/work or "shopkeeper" units will also be provided on the ground floor along Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive, and a few flex spaces are provided along Parkcourt Place to further activate the area. On -Site Parking On -site parking for Parcel 1 is provided via a 6.5-level parking structure with a total of 898 parking spaces, at a rate of 2.0 parking spaces per unit. Of the proposed 898 parking spaces, 90 parking spaces will be allocated for guest and patrons of the commercial area, with the remaining 808 spaces allocated for residence parking only. As proposed, the retail/commercial and resident guest parking spaces will be located on the ground floor and subterranean level of the parking structure, which will remain ungated. Residents will be provided with a transponder or similar device (e.g., fob or key card, etc.) for remote access to the upper gated residential parking area, accessed from Level 1 of the parking structure. Onsite parking for Parcel 2 is provided via 116 covered parking spaces through tuck -under two -car garages per unit. In addition, 11 surface parking spaces will be provided for guest parking. The townhouse development will be parked at a rate of 2.2 parking spaces per unit. Although not counted as a part of the overall project's parking supply, an additional 23 on -street parking spaces will be provided along Parkcourt Place for visitors and guests. A Parking Management Plan (PMP), attached hereto as Exhibit 6, was prepared for the project to ensure adequate parking is being provided and managed properly for all project residents, tenants, employees and guests. The PMP identifies how parking stalls will be assigned, how gates will be managed, and how access (keycard, access codes) for residents, guests, employees, and public will be provided. Based on the provided PMP, it is concluded that adequate parking will be provided to satisfy the parking demand for residents, guests, and employees of the project. Nevertheless, to ensure adequate parking is provided for all users of the project, a condition of approval requiring the property owner and/or property management company to implement and City Council 18 — 5 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 6 enforce the appropriate parking management strategy recommended in the PMP has been included on the project resolutions. Open Space and Amenities Open space and amenities will be provided on the site in a variety of means, including private unit balconies and patios, amenity rooftop deck, ground -level courtyards, and the town center plaza. Parcel 1 will provide 24,148 square feet of private open space, in the form of private decks. With the exception of the proposed studio units, all other units will have a private outdoor deck ranging in size between 53 and 61 square feet. In addition, 44,019 square feet of common open space will be provided. Four courtyards will be provided throughout Parcel 1, including Courtyard `A' (Apartment Pool) approximately 11,851 square feet in size, Courtyard `B' ("Entertainment") approximately 6,311 square feet in size, and Courtyards C and D ("The Backyards") proposed at 4,994 and 5,624 square feet in size. These courtyard spaces will be highly amenitized, will create unique outdoor areas within the development, and will function as both passive and active outdoor spaces. Moreover, the outdoor areas will provide functional amenities to residents (e.g., dog run, dining tables, shade structures, fire pits, BBQ, etc.). The open space will also feature a landscape palette with seating options and a variety of hardscaping materials, trees, and shrubs. Parcel 1 will also provide additional amenities, including 250 cubic feet of personal storage (four -by -eight -foot storage unit), a 2,410-square-foot fitness room, a 1,656- square-foot lounge room, and a 1,655-square foot clubroom. In addition, the development will include a 7,500-square-foot roof terrace located three feet above the parking structure. The terrace would provide outdoor kitchen amenities (e.g., BBQ counters with sit up bar, shade trellis, lounge seating pods, and dining tables); private dining areas (e.g., pendant lighting, BBQ, dining table, and pottery); a view deck with seating and a fire pit; a fireside lounge with soft seating and a fire pit; and passive and active outdoor spaces (e.g., game terrace, "The Pavilion," and "The Lawn"). These passive and active spaces would provide lounge seating, synthetic turf, a media wall, festival lighting, cabanas with lounge seating, a sit-up island counter, lounge area with TV, pool tables, and game tables. Parcel 2 will provide 9,424 square feet of private open space in the form of private decks. Each townhouse unit will have a second story private deck ranging in size between 109 and 208 square feet. The development will also provide approximately 9,514 square feet of common open space, in the form of a pool and spa courtyard (8,934 square feet) and pool building (580 square feet). The pool and spa courtyard will be centrally located and will provide outdoor dining (e.g., BBQ, overhead shade structures, and dining tables), lounge furniture (e.g., umbrellas, daybeds, chaise lounge seating), a 52-foot long pool, a spa, and matching height date palms. The design and layout of the proposed open space would create a unique outdoor area within the City Council 18 — 6 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 7 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. development, which function as a passive outdoor space and provide functional amenities to residents. Lastly, the project also includes 47,810 square feet (1.10 acres) of publicly accessible open space via the town center plaza and paseos along Fourth Street, Cabrillo Park Drive, and Parkcourt Place. The town center plaza will include outdoor dining opportunities, decorative hardscape, specimen trees and plantings, umbrellas, seating, and lawn games. The paseo along the east property line of Parcel 1 will include a dog park and the paseos along Fourth Street, Cabrillo Park Drive, and Parkcourt Pace will include enhanced pavement, seating, and other street furniture. Off -Site Improvements Offsite improvements include a new signalized intersection and crosswalks at Cabrillo Park Drive and Parkcourt Place; this traffic signal is an existing requirement stemming from the entitlement of the adjacent Central Pointe mixed -use project. An exclusive westbound right -turn lane at Cabrillo Park Drive and Fourth Street will also be constructed. Pedestrian circulation would be provided via existing public sidewalks along Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive, which will connect to the project site and to Cabrillo Park to the north of the site. The project will protect the existing sidewalk along project frontage, and if necessary, repair or reconstruct sidewalks along the project frontage. Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance Compliance The City's inclusionary housing ordinance, known as the Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO) (SAMC Sec. 41-1900 et seq.), applies to housing projects proposing five or more units that are also requesting an increase in allowable density or are located in certain sections of the City that were "up -zoned" to allow additional residential development after November 28, 2011, including residential overlay districts. As the proposed project is located within the MEMU and is seeking to develop a project per its standards, the project is subject to the AHOCO requirements of the production of affordable housing or payment of in -lieu fees. Pursuant to Section 41- 1904(c) of the SAMC, the applicant has selected the option to pay in -lieu fees. Based on available figures for the project, the project will contribute an estimated $8,043,600 in in -lieu fees, which must be spent on production of affordable housing in the City of Santa Ana. Table 3 below illustrates the calculation methodology. Table 3: AHOCO In -Lieu Fee Calculation Estimated Habitable Sq. Ft. In -Lieu Fee Per Habitable Sq. Final Estimated Total Ft. (Habitable Sq. Ft. Multiplied by In -Lieu Fee Parcel 1 = 386,314 sq. ft. $ 15.00 per sq. ft. $5,794,710 Parcel 2 = 149,926 sq. ft. $2,248,890 Total: $8,043,600 City Council 18 — 7 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 8 Senate Bill (SB) 330 Application SB 330 became effective on January 1, 2020, and established a statewide "housing emergency" until January 1, 2025, which was extended until 2030 through the passage of SB 8. The senate bill amended Government Code Section 65941.1 with the broad goals of facilitating increased production of new residential units, protecting existing units, and providing for an expedited review and approval process for housing development projects through submittal of a "preliminary application." It is important to note that since the application was submitted under SB 330, the project is required to comply with the objective zoning code standards applicable to the property, but only to the extent that they facilitate the development at the density allowed by the General Plan, 90 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) per the District Center -Medium High (DC-3) General Plan land use designation and a decision on the project must be made in no more than five public hearings. On May 11, 2022, the applicant submitted a Senate Bill (SB) 330 Preliminary Application for the proposed project. The preliminary application was deemed complete by staff on June 9, 2022, and since then, the applicant worked with staff to address all development standards. Analysis of Appeal Appeal Application No. 2023-02 (SAFER) Pursuant to Section 41-645 of the SAMC, the appellant is requesting that the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's decision approving SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03 based on compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Specifically, the appellant states that: (1) The decision of the Planning Commission was in "violation" of CEQA; (2) The City's determination that the Project was analyzed in the 2010 Metro East Mixed Used (MEMU) Overlay Zone EIR and Subsequent EIR was incorrect; (3) The Project would have new and different significant environmental impacts that were not analyzed in the MEMU EIR; and (4) That a project - specific EIR should have been prepared to analyze the Project. Staff notes that the appellant does not provide any substantial evidence that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Moreover, the appellant does not provide information as to why they believe a project -specific EIR should have been prepared, or what new and different significant environmental impacts would result from the Project that have not already been analyzed in the EIR and Subsequent EIR. Nevertheless, a comprehensive response on the appeal items previously outlined has been prepared and can be found in Exhibit 10. City Council 18 — 8 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 9 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Appeal Application No. 2023-03 (SWMSRCC) Pursuant to Section 41-645(a) of the SAMC, this appellant is requesting that the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's decision approving SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03 and provides four main reasons to substantiate the request, including: (1) Requirement of a local workforce; (2) Training requirements to prevent community spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases; (3) CEQA compliance; and (4) Inconsistency with the City's General Plan. In addition, the City received a supplemental comment letter on August 17, 2023, from Mitchell M. Tsai, on behalf of the SWMSRCC. Staff notes that this letter is outside of the 10-day appeal period, as outlined in Section 41-645(b) of the SAMC. Therefore, the subsequent appeal items do not satisfy the requirements of SAMC Section 41-645 and should not be considered. Nonetheless, staff has prepared a comprehensive response on all appeal items received (original appeal letter and supplemental), which can be found in Exhibit 10. MEMU Site Plan Review Pursuant to Section 41-595.5 of the SAMC and sections 2.3 and 8.1 of the MEMU, approval of a Site Plan Review by the Planning Commission is require for any project wishing to develop per the MEMU standards. In accordance with Section 8.2 (Findings for Granting a MEMU Overlay Zone Site Plan Review Approval) an analysis of the project's compliance with the MEMU is provided in Table 4 below. Table 4: MEMU Findings for Site Plan Review Approval Finding Project Compliance That the proposed development plan The project will create a new mixed -use development within is consistent with and will further the close proximity to office buildings, Cabrillo Park, Mabury Park, objectives outlined in Section 1.2 for and less than two miles from Downtown Santa Ana, which the MEMU. provides additional opportunities to live, work, and play. The proposed project includes two distinct market -rate housing product types, including a townhouse development and mixed - use residential development. Each townhouse building will be three -stories in height, while the mixed -use building will be five - stories with ground floor commercial/retail and residential units on upper floors, wrapped around a 6.5-level parking structure. The height of the buildings will blend in with the heights of the nearby office buildings, which range from single -story, three- story and eight -story buildings. The project will be built to California Building Code standards, which include energy and water conservation measures and will improve pedestrian mobility by providing new sidewalks and parkways along Fourth Street and Parkcourt Place. In addition, the publically accessible linear park along Parkcourt Place will serve as a link to the Cabrillo Park to the north. Each residential unit will have storage opportunities for personal City Council 18 — 9 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 10 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Finding Project Compliance bicycles. Additionally, public transit bus service is provided in the project area by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Four OCTA bus routes operate within the vicinity of the project site on First Street, Fourth Street, Seventeenth Street, and Tustin Avenue, which consists of the following: OCTA routes 60, 64, 71, and 463. The commercial space has been designed with retail floor heights of approximately 20 feet with storefronts that will be visible from Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. In addition, the commercial space links directly to an on -site public plaza at the corner of Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive which will include outdoor dining opportunities, decorative hardscape, specimen trees and plantings, umbrellas, seating and lawn games. In addition, the ground floor residential units along Parkcourt Place will have doors and patios with direct access to the street to help activate the street. That the proposed development plan The project is consistent with the development standards is consistent with the development specified in Section 4 of the MEMU including land use, height, standards specified in Section 4 of minimum development site area, building frontages, publically the MEMU. accessible open space, private/common open space, building setbacks, and parking and access. The propose project is a mixed -use development that has been well designed to fit within the Village Center District. Further, the access and egress for the project has been thoroughly review by the Public works Agency for compliance with all applicable development standards. That the proposed development plan The project is consistent with the development standards is designed to be compatible with specified in Section 5 of the MEMU. The building is designed adjacent development in terms of with a high quality design that includes varied massing, similarity of scale, height, and site changes in form, and is comprised of high quality materials configuration and otherwise achieves including a light sand stucco exterior, fiber cement panel siding, the objectives of the Design metal railings, aluminum storefronts, brick veneer, metal Principles specified in Section 5 of the canopies, and high quality architectural detailing (e.g., exterior MEMU. lighting, entry doors, fenestration, etc.). During the development review process, staff provided extensive design comments, which resulted in higher -quality building materials, an increase in the commercial square footage (i.e., live/work), and building elevations that are architecturally detailed and designed to be pedestrian -oriented. The commercial storefronts are enhanced with cornices and metal canopies and the primary access to the commercial uses will be from Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. The project promotes pedestrian activity with landscaping and publically accessible open space. That the land use uses, site design, The project is consistent with the development standards and operational considerations in the specified in Section 7 of the MEMU. The project has been proposed development plan have designed to ensure compatibility between the residential and been planned in a manner that will non-residential uses on site. The commercial uses have result in a compatible and separate entrances from the residential uses, and the parking management plan will manage parking between the residential City Council 18 — 10 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 11 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Finding Project Compliance harmonious operation as specified in Section 7 of the MEMU. and nonresidential uses. On -site lighting will be consistent with Chapter 8 of the SAMC. Tentative Tract Map Subdivision requests are governed by Chapter 34 and Chapter 41 of the SAMC. Pursuant to Section 66473.5 and 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act, applications for tentative tract maps are approved when it can be shown that findings can be made in support of the request. Specifically, findings related to the proposal need to be made that find the project is consistent with the General Plan, the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed project, the proposed project will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat, the proposed project will not cause serious public health problems, or the proposed project will not conflict with easements necessary for public access through or use of the property must be made. Using this information staff has prepared the following analysis, which, in turn forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. In analyzing the applicant's request, staff believes that the following analysis warrants approval of the tentative tract map. The applicant is seeking approval of a tentative tract map (County Map No. 19243) to create two legal lots, one of which will be subdivided for condominium purposes for the townhome portion of the site. Upon completion of the subdivision, the lots will continue to be utilized for residential use in the form of attached tuck -under unit type structures (townhouse development), and commercial/residential mixed -use (wrap building). In reviewing the project, staff determined that the proposal as conditioned is consistent with the various provisions of the City's General Plan. As an SB 330 application, the proposed development has been found to be consistent with the objective general plan standards for the property. Further conditions of approval have been included to ensure the site's landscaping, architectural design, and Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) continue to be in compliance with all applicable standards of the SAMC and the MEMU in the future. Further, no adverse environmental impacts to fish or wildlife populations were identified as the project site is located in a built -out, urbanized area. The project will also maintain all required easements. Finally, the tentative tract map was found to be consistent with the California Subdivision Map Act and Chapter 34 of the SAMC. Public Notification and Community Outreach Project notifications were posted, published, and mailed in accordance with City and State regulations for both the Planning Commission hearing and the City Council appeal hearing. In addition, staff contacted the provided contacts for the Lyon Street and Mabury Park neighborhood associations to ensure they were aware of the project and City Council 18 —11 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 12 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. public hearing. At the time this report was printed, no issues of concern were raised regarding the proposed development. The applicant also held two community meetings in conformance to the Sunshine Ordinance notification requirements. The first meeting was on held Monday, August 15, 2022 and the second meeting was held on Thursday, November 10, 2022. Both meetings were publicly noticed in the OC Register, posted on the City's website, and invitation mailers were sent to all addresses within a 1000-foot radius of the project site, as well as local community organizations. Participants asked questions about the project timing and construction impacts, affordability levels, project density, and about potential traffic and parking impacts to the community. Approximately 18-25 individuals attended both meetings. Materials from both meetings are posted to the project's City webpage for public viewing. FISCAL IMPACT AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS The applicant retained the services of The Concord Group (TCG) to prepare a fiscal and economic impact analysis of the proposed project which included confirmation of the rent/revenue levels for the product offerings as well as the primary fiscal and economic benefits to the City from the proposed development (Exhibit 7). To validate the findings of the analysis, the City retained the services of the Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) to peer review the study. TCG's analysis reveals positive economic and fiscal impacts from the proposed development due to the project site's location in a high -value, jobs -rich area surrounded by employment centers and mixed -use commercial developments. The report's conclusions about the proposed project are noted in Table 5 below. Table 5: Key Findings of the Proposed Project Topic Proposed Project Mixed -Use Market Due to the mixed -use environment and strong access and visibility, the rental Assessment apartments, for -sale townhomes, and ground floor retail are well positioned within the market. Fiscal Impact Analysis Based on a total construction budget of $249 million, the project is projected to generate a recurring revenue of approximately $22.8 million (which includes $10,452,020 in Property Tax, $4,574,958 in Property Tax in -lieu of Motor Vehicle Licenses fees, $3,210,515 in Utility Use Tax, $3,838,764 in Resident - Derived Sales Tax, and $717,990 in Retail Sales Tax) over the next 25 years after build -out period (three years of construction). Total City expenditures over the next 25 years after build -out are expected to be $14.5 million (which includes police, fire, and other services) resulting in net revenue of $8.3 million. Employment Impacts During construction, the project will generate approximately 1,913 jobs (1,266 direct, 323 indirect, and 323 induced). After completion, the project will maintain approximately 32 jobs (21 direct, 6 indirect, and 6 induced). Permit Fees The City will receive approximately $15.5 million in revenue from permit fees, AHOCO in -lieu fees, park impact fees, and other development impact fees. City Council 18 — 12 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 13 Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Impacts to Neighboring Redevelopment of the site from commercial/office uses will not negatively affect Commercial the local neighborhood as the market performance suggest an oversupplied commercial zone. Given the vacant office space surrounding the site, there exists the opportunity to relocate onsite existing office tenants within the local neighborhood. Moreover, the project's proposed commercial space and live/work units are expected to be absorbed by the market. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is within the scope of the 2007 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and 2018 Subsequent EIR (SEIR) (SCH No. 2006031041). The 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR anticipated potential development of 5,551 residential units, 963,000 square feet of commercial development, and 690,000 of office development. The 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR analyzed impacts related to aesthetics, agriculture/forestry, air quality, biology, cultural resources, geology/soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population/housing, public services, transportation/traffic, tribal cultural resources, and utilities. The EIR and SEIR concluded that there would be significant and unavoidable impacts associated with air quality, noise, and transportation/traffic, and mitigation measures were developed and recorded through an approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). As required by the MMRP, a traffic impact analysis (Exhibit 9G) was prepared for this project by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers (LLG). The analysis evaluated the existing operating conditions at 25 intersections, estimated the trip generation potential of the project, and forecasted future near -term and long-term operating conditions without the proposed project. Based on the analysis, off -site improvements are required at various intersections and at difference timeframes, as identified in the traffic analysis which the project will comply with. The previously prepared 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR adequately described the project's environmental setting, significant impacts and alternatives, and mitigation measures related to each impact. There are no substantial changes with respect to circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the EIR. There is no new information of substantial importance, and there are no new environmental impact or mitigation measure needed. All applicable mitigation measure, attached hereto as Exhibit 8, applied to the previously prepared 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR will be applied to this project. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis provided within this report, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution denying Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of a SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. City Council 18 — 13 10/3/2023 Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) October 3, 2023 Page 14 2023-03 to facilitate the construction of a mixed -use development known as Cabrillo Town Center at 1901 East Fourth Street. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Appeal Application No. 2023-02 — Lozeau Drury, LLP on behalf of SAFER 2. Appeal Application No. 2023-03 — Mitchell M. Tsai on behalf of SWMSRCC 3. Supplemental Comments — Mitchell M. Tsai on behalf of SWMSRCC, Dated August 17, 2023 4. Resolution Denying Appeal Applications 2023-02 and 2023-03 and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03 5. April 24, 2023 — Planning Commission Staff Report 6. Parking Study & Management Plan 7. Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis 8. MEMU Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9. Peer Reviewed Technical Memorandum and Exhibits 10.9A. Air Quality Technical Report 11.9B. Historic Resources Report 12.9C. Geotechnical Report 13.9D. Greenhouse Gas Technical Report 14.9E. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment 15.9F. Noise Technical Report 16.9G. Traffic Impact Analysis 17.9H. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment 18.91. OCTA Route 064 19.9J. Updated Traffic Circulation Analysis Addendum 20.10. Response to Appeal Comments Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 18 — 14 10/3/2023 Planning and Building Agency Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 (M-20) Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 647-5804 I. OWNER/APPLICANT APPEAL APPLICATION Applicant Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), represented by Lozeau Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150, Oakland CA 94612 Mailing Address Legal Owner Name: Full name of Person, Firm, or Corporation (510 ) 836-4200 Area Code Phone No. Legal Owner Address: Phone No.: ( ) ( ) Fax: ( ) II. PROPERTY INFORMATION Land Use Commercial office buildings Professional (P) District Center - Medium (DC-3) Existing Land Use of Property and/or Building Zoning District General Plan Designation Location 1901 and 1971 East Fourth Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive Street Address Name of Nearest Intersecting Street SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS III. REASON FOR REQUEST In the following provided space, please clearly specify and explain the error(s) of decision or requirement upon which you are basing this appeal. (If additional space is needed, please attach additional comments to the back of this application.) The April 24, 2023 decision of the Planning Commission to approve Site Plan Review No. 2023-01 and Tentative Tract Map No. 2023-03 for the proposed Cabrillo Town Center Project is in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQX). The city staffs determination that the Project was analyzed in the 2010 Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone Environmental Impact Report and 2018 Subsequent EIR (collectively, "MEMU EIR") is incorrect. The proposed Project will have new and different significant environmental impacts that were not analyzed in the MEMU EIR. A project -specific EIR should have been prepared to analyze the Project and mitigate its impacts, and the Planning Commission should have declined to approve the project until proper CEQA review was complete. it May 1 2023 Applicant's Signature: Date: APPEAL APPLICATION NO. cm\cntr-frm\appeal 5/00 City Council 18 — 15 10/3/2023 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. An appeal application form (Exhibit 1). 2. A letter stating the nature of the appeal (in lieu of the space provided on the appeal form). 3. The application fee. 4. Any other pertinent information that the application warrants. City Council 18 — 16 10/3/2023 Planning and Building Agency Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 (M-20) Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 647-5804 I. OWNER/APPLICANT APPEAL APPLICATION Applicant Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters Full name of Person, Firm, or Corporation 533 S. Fremont Ave., 10th FI., Los Angeles CA 90071 Mailing Address Legal Owner Name: Sapetto Real Estate Solutions (applicant); David Colton (owner) (213 ) 385-1457 Area Code Phone No. Legal Owner Address: One Park Plaza, Suite 600, PMB313, Irvine, CA 92614 (Sapetto) 515 Cabrillo Park Dr STE 305, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (The Colton Company) Phone No.: 049 ) 252-0841 (Sapetto) (714) 547-0800 (Colton Company) Fax: ( II. PROPERTY INFORMATION Land Use Cabrillo Park & Medical Offfices Existing Land Use of Property and/or Building Location 1901 and 1917 E. Fourth St.; 515 and 525 N. Cabrillo Park Dr. Street Address P and Village Center District District Center - Medium (DC-3) Zoning District General Plan Designation Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Dr. Name of Nearest Intersecting Street SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS III. REASON FOR REQUEST In the following provided space, please clearly specify and explain the error(s) of decision or requirement upon which you are basing this appeal. (If additional space is needed, please attach additional comments to the back of this application.) See attached letter. Applicant's Signature: Date: APPEAL APPLICATION NO. May 3, 2023 cm\cntr-frm\appeal 5/00 City Council 18 — 17 10/3/2023 P: (626) 314-3821 139 South Hudson Avenue F: (626) 389-5414 Mitchell M. Tsai Suite 200 E: info@mitchtsailaw.com Attorney At Law Pasadena, California 91101 VIA E-MAIL May 3, 2023 Ali Pezeshkpour, Planning Manager City of Santa Ana Planning Department 20 Civic Centre Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 Em: APezeshkpournsanta-ana.org RE: Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project [SPR No. 2023-01] [TTM No. 2023-03] Dear City of Santa Ana Planning Department, On behalf of the Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters ("Southwest Mountain States Carpenters" or "SWMSRCC"), my Office is submitting this appeal of the April24, 2023 Planning Commission decision approving the Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development project (Project"). During its development review, the Project was subject to two community "Sunshine" meetings on August 15 and November 10, 2022, where members of the general public raised concerns regarding the Project.' Nevertheless, on April 24, 2023, the Planning Commission approved the Project. Accordingly, SWMSRCC is now submitting this appeal within 10 days of the Planning Commission meeting, as required.2 The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters is a labor union representing 63,000 union carpenters in 10 states, including California, and has a strong interest in well -ordered land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects. Individual members of SWMSRCC live, work, and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project's environmental impacts. ' See City's Project Information page, available athttps://www.santa-ana.org/cabrillo-town- center-1901-e-fourth-street/. Z See Santa Ana Municipal Code, section 41-645(b). City Council 18 — 18 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 2 of 12 I. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT First, SWMSRCC maintains that the City should require the Project to be built using a local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor -Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the- job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state -approved apprenticeship training program, or who are registered apprentices in a state -approved apprenticeship training program. Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note: [A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site. March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling. Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded: [L]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost —and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California's workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, City Council 18 — 19 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 3 of 12 well -trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.3 Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that they improve an area's jobs -housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job commutes and the associated greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. In fact, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the "[u]se of a local state -certified apprenticeship program" can result in air pollutant reductions.4 Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits. As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008: People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.' Moreover, local hire mandates and skill -training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled ("VMT"). As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must match those held by local residents.' Some municipalities have even tied local hire and s California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ wp-content/uploads /2020 /09 /Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf. a South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 — Warehouse Indirect Source Rule — Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 — Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available athttp://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021 /2021-May7-027.12df?sfvrsn=10. S California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs -Housing Balance at p. 6, available athttps://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobs- housingpdf e Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs - Housing Balance or Retail -Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available athttp://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT- 825.pdf. City Council 18 — 20 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 4 of 12 other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. Cervero and Duncan note that: In nearly built -out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city's First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate -level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment -ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits. Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 ("AB2011"). AB2011 amended the Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by -right approval for projects being built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements. The City should utilize local workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts. II. THE CITY SHOULD IMPOSE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT COMMUNITY SPREAD OF COVID-19 AND OTHER INFECTIOUS DISEASES Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High -risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. In fact, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID- 19.' Thus, the City should adopt additional requirements to mitigate public health risks from the Project's construction activities such as requiring safe on -site 'Santa Clara County Public Health Qune 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, available athttps://www.sccgov.org/sites/ covidl 9 /Pages /press-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aspx. City Council 18 — 21 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 5 of 12 construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site. In particular, based upon Southwest Mountain States Carpenters' experience with safe construction site work practices, SWMSRCC recommends that the City require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site: Construction Site Design: • The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry points. • Entry points will have temperature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open. • The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics for conducting temperature screening. • A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening. • The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social distancing position for when you approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details. • There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening. • Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction site. Testing Procedures: • The temperature screening being used are non -contact devices. • Temperature readings will not be recorded. • Personnel will be screened upon entering the testing center and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual. City Council 18 — 22 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 6 of 12 • Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before temperature screening. • Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions will be refused access to the Project Site. • Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am.; main gate [ZONE 1] and personnel gate [ZONE 2] • After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance [ZONE 1] will continue to be used for temperature testing for anybody gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel, deliveries, and visitors. • If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading. • If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her human resources (HR) representative and provide them with a copy of Annex A. Planning • Require the development of an Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10 people including all -hands meetings and all -hands lunches) communication and training and workplace controls that meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health City Council 18 — 23 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 7 of 12 Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.8 The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The City should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site. Southwest Mountain States Carpenters has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment ("ICRA") training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments. ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities. ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities. The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols. III. THE CITY SHOULD HAVE PREPARED A SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROJECT CEQA is a California statute designed to inform decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines") 5 15002(a)(1).10 At its core, "[i]ts purpose is to $ See also The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America's Building Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S Constructions Sites, available athttps://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/NABTU CPWR Standards COVID-19.12df; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/docs/pw guidelines-construction-sites.pdf. e For details concerning Southwest Carpenters's ICRA training program, see httVs://icrahealthcare.com/. to The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq, are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.) The CEQA Guidelines are given "great weight in interpreting CEQA except when ... clearly unauthorized or City Council 18 — 24 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 8 of 12 inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made." Citi.Zens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553, 564. To achieve this purpose, CEQA mandates preparation of an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for projects so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed. Communities for a Better Environment P. Ricbmond (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4th 70, 80. The EIR requirement "is the heart of CEQA." CEQA Guidelines, § 15003(a). The preparation and circulation of an EIR is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. The EIR's function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been considered. For the EIR to serve these goals it must present information so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed, and the public must be given an adequate opportunity to comment on that presentation before the decision to go forward is made. Communities for a Better Environment v. Ricbmond (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4th 70, 80 (quoting Vineyard Area Citi.Zens for Re ponsible Growth, Inc. P. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal. 4th 412, 449-450). Here, the City contends that no subsequent EIR is necessary pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines because the Project is within the scope of Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone EIR ("Metro EIR") and that there are no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances or new necessary mitigation measures. Specifically, the meeting Agenda states: the project is within the scope of a project covered by a previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (Metro East Mixed- Use Overlay Zone and SCH NO. 2006031041). The previously prepared EIR adequately described the project's environmental setting, significant impacts and alternatives, and mitigation measures related to each impact. There are no substantial changes with respect to circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the EIR. There is no new information of substantial erroneous." Center for Biological Diversity P. Department of Fisb dam' Wlildlife (2015) 62 Cal. 4th 204, 217. City Council 18 — 25 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 9 of 12 importance. There are no new environmental impact or mitigation measure needed. All applicable mitigation measure applied to the previously prepared EIR will be applied to this project. Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requires a subsequent EIR any time: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: (a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. City Council 18 — 26 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 10 of 12 Given that there have been substantial changes to the Project and Project circumstances, and new information of substantial importance has come out since the certification of the Metro EIR, a subsequent EIR should have been prepared. A. There Are New Transportation Impact Methodology Requirements, Not Analyzed in the Metro EIR In July 2020, Senate Bill ("SB") 743 took effect in order to help reduce transportation impacts. Specifically, in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas impacts and create long term sustainability, SB 743 changed the standard for evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA from a Level of Service ("LOS") standard to Vehicle Miles Traveled ("VMT") standard. Thus, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section 15064.3(a), VMT "is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts". Here, the Metro EIR, which was certified in 2007, uses the outdated LOS methodology to analyze traffic and transportation impacts. Metro PEIR at 4.12-9, et seq." Thus, a subsequent EIR analyzing the Project's VMT is necessary in order to adequately assess the Project's transportation impacts, especially when considering that the Metro EIR found significant and unavoidable transportation impacts given the substantial increase in traffic. Id. at 4.12-54. B. The Project Requires New Feasible Mitigation Measures to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Impacts The Project at hand also requires new feasible mitigation measures not specified in the PEIR such as electric vehicle ("EV") parking and charging stations and solar system installation. Such measures are of particular importance given the Metro EIR failed entirely to assess greenhouse gas ("GHG") impacts. Metro EIR at 4-1 — 4-2. First, although the Project is slated to provide 898 parking stalls, the Master EIR fails to specify the new requirement that residential buildings must designate 10% of their parking spaces as EV capable, equip 25% of the parking spaces with low power level 2 EV charging receptacles, and equip 5% of the spaces with level 2 EV supply equipment. GBC 4.106.4.2. Further, the Metro EIR fails to include a mitigation measure requiring the installation of photovoltaic and battery system, as required by section 1040.10 of the 2022 Energy " The EIR can be found at https://www.santa-ana.org/metro-east-mixed-use-overlay-zone/. City Council 18 — 27 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 11 of 12 Efficiency Standards. Thus, a subsequent EIR should have been prepared to specify and incorporate these additional feasible mitigation measures. C. The Project May Have Significant Land Use Impacts Which Were Not Analyzed in the Metro EIR Yet another reason why a subsequent EIR should have been prepared is because the Project may have significant unanalyzed land use impacts stemming from the Project's request for a tentative tract map ("TTM"). Specifically, the Metro EIR provides that the: project approvals include certification of the EIR for the proposed project, as well as adoption of the Overlay Zone and associated General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. This EIR is intended as a Program EIR, and specific developmentproposals made in the Overlay Zone would be subject to separate environmental clearance) review. Metro EIR at 3-17. Thus, a subsequent EIR which specifically analyzes the Project's TTM request in its land use consistency analysis is necessary. Additionally, the Project runs afoul to the General Plan since it fails to provide any affordable housing units. One policy of the General Plan is to "encourage private and commercial recreational facilities that are physically open to the public and are affordable to residents of surrounding neighborhoods". General Plan, Policy OS-1.10. Similarly, the General Plan provides that the City must "explore development and subdivision options that promote new opportunities for sustainable, livable, and affordable development." General Plan, Policy UD-2.8. As the Project at hand provides no affordable housing units, it conflicts with the General Plan. For this reason too, the City should have prepared a subsequent EIR to assess the Project's land use impacts. V. CONCLUSION In sum, SMSWRCC maintains that the City should require a local workforce, that the City should impose training requirements for the Project's construction activities to prevent community spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, and that the City should have prepared a subsequent EIR for the Project addressing the aforementioned concerns to be CEQA compliant. If the City has any questions, feel free to contact my office. City Council 18 — 28 10/3/2023 Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project May 3, 2023 Page 12 of 12 Sincerely, r Talia Nimmer Attorneys for Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters Attached: March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C). City Council 18 — 29 10/3/2023 EXHIBIT A City Council 18 — 30 10/3/2023 S� p Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and JLitigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg. (949) 887-9013 mhagemann@swape.com Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD (310) 795-2335 prosenfeld@swape.com March 8, 2021 Mitchell M. Tsai 155 South El Molino, Suite 104 Pasadena, CA 91101 Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling Dear Mr. Tsai, Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise ("SWAPE") is pleased to provide the following draft technical report explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with respect to the estimation of greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. The report will also discuss the potential for local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the potential GHG impacts. Worker Trips and Greenhouse Gas Calculations The California Emissions Estimator Model ("CaIEEMod") is a "statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects."' CaIEEMod quantifies construction -related emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off -road construction equipment; on -road mobile equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition, truck loading, and on -road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating activities; and paving.2 The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CaIEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on -road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.' 1 "California Emissions Estimator Model." CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/home. Z "California Emissions Estimator Model." CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/home. 3 "CaIEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 1 City Council 18 — 31 10/3/2023 Specifically, the number and length of vehicle trips is utilized to estimate the vehicle miles travelled ("VMT") associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle -class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CaIEEMod calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction -related VMT, including personal vehicles for worker commuting.4 Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CaIEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip length (see excerpt below): "VMTd = F(Average Daily Trip Rate i * Average Overall Trip Length 1) n Where: n = Number of land uses being modeled."' Furthermore, to calculate the on -road emissions associated with worker trips, CaIEEMod utilizes the following equation (see excerpt below): "EmisslonSpollutant = VMT * EFrunning,pollutant Where: Emissionspollutant = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant VMT = vehicle miles traveled EFrunning,pollutant = emission factor for running emissions."' Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise. Default Worker Trip Parameters and Potential Local Hire Requirements As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CaIEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on -road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.' In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CaIEEMod default worker trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site -specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project - specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.' The default number of construction -related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the 4 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15. 5 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, P. 23. ' "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 7 "CalEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. $ CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 1, 9. 2 City Council 18 — 32 10/3/2023 number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the building construction and architectural coating phases.9 Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25 percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively."10 Finally, the default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home -to -work vehicle trips.11 The operational home -to -work vehicle trip lengths are: "[B]ased on the location and urbanization selected on the project characteristic screen. These values were supplied by the air districts or use a default average for the state. Each district (or county) also assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings" (emphasis added)." Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when modeling emissions. The below table shows the CaIEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).13 Worker Trip Length by Air Basin Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles) Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8 Lake County 16.8 10.8 Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8 Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8 Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8 North Central Coast 17.1 12.3 North Coast 16.8 10.8 Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8 Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8 Salton Sea 14.6 11 San Diego 16.8 10.8 San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8 San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8 South Central Coast 16.8 10.8 South Coast 19.8 14.7 Average 16.47 11.17 Minimum 10.80 10.80 Maximum 19.80 14.70 Range 9.00 3.90 9 "CaIEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 11 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14. 12 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 21. 13 "Appendix D Default Data Tables." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05 appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 - D-86. 3 City Council 18 - 33 10/3/2023 As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8- miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7- miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location. Practical Application of a Local Hire Requirement and Associated Impact To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction -related GHG emissions, we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan ("Project") located in the City of Claremont ("City"). The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles -South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip length of 14.7 miles.14 In an effort to evaluate the potential for a local hire provision to reduce the Project's construction -related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17% (see table below and Attachment C). Local Hire Provision Net Change Without Local Hire Provision Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 3,623 120.77 With Local Hire Provision Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) % Decrease in Construction -related GHG Emissions 3,024 100.80 17% As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site. This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project -level GHG emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction -related GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on the worker trip length enforced and the default worker trip length for the project's urbanization level and location. 14 "Appendix D Default Data Tables." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05 appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85. 4 City Council 18 — 34 10/3/2023 Disclaimer SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties. Sincerely, G Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. �p Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. 5 City Council 18 — 35 10/3/2023 Attachment A Rural H-W Urban H-W Location Type Location Name (miles) (miles) Air Basin Great Basin 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Lake County 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Mountain 16.8 10.8 Air Basin North Central 17.1 12.3 Air Basin North Coast 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Northeast 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Sacramento 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Salton Sea 14.6 11 Air Basin San Diego 16.8 10.8 Air Basin San Francisco 10.8 10.8 Air Basin San Joaquin 16.8 10.8 Air Basin South Central 16.8 10.8 Air Basin South Coast 19.8 14.7 Air District Amador County 16.8 10.8 Air District Antelope Valley 16.8 10.8 Air District Bay Area AQMD 10.8 10.8 Air District Butte County 12.54 12.54 Air District Calaveras 16.8 10.8 Air District Colusa County 16.8 10.8 Air District El Dorado 16.8 10.8 Air District Feather River 16.8 10.8 Air District Glenn County 16.8 10.8 Air District Great Basin 16.8 10.8 Air District Imperial County 10.2 7.3 Air District Kern County 16.8 10.8 Air District Lake County 16.8 10.8 Air District Lassen County 16.8 10.8 Air District Mariposa 16.8 10.8 Air District Mendocino 16.8 10.8 Air District Modoc County 16.8 10.8 Air District Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8 Air District Monterey Bay 16.8 10.8 Air District North Coast 16.8 10.8 Air District Northern Sierra 16.8 10.8 Air District Northern 16.8 10.8 Air District Placer County 16.8 10.8 Air District Sacramento 15 10 City Council 18 - 36 10/3/2023 Air District San Diego 16.8 10.8 Air District San Joaquin 16.8 10.8 Air District San Luis Obispo 13 13 Air District Santa Barbara 8.3 8.3 Air District Shasta County 16.8 10.8 Air District Siskiyou County 16.8 10.8 Air District South Coast 19.8 14.7 Air District Tehama County 16.8 10.8 Air District Tuolumne 16.8 10.8 Air District Ventura County 16.8 10.8 Air District Yolo/Solano 15 10 County Alameda 10.8 10.8 County Alpine 16.8 10.8 County Amador 16.8 10.8 County Butte 12.54 12.54 County Calaveras 16.8 10.8 County Colusa 16.8 10.8 County Contra Costa 10.8 10.8 County Del Norte 16.8 10.8 County El Dorado -Lake 16.8 10.8 County El Dorado- 16.8 10.8 County Fresno 16.8 10.8 County Glenn 16.8 10.8 County Humboldt 16.8 10.8 County Imperial 10.2 7.3 County Inyo 16.8 10.8 County Kern -Mojave 16.8 10.8 County Kern -San 16.8 10.8 County Kings 16.8 10.8 County Lake 16.8 10.8 County Lassen 16.8 10.8 County Los Angeles- 16.8 10.8 County Los Angeles- 19.8 14.7 County Madera 16.8 10.8 County Marin 10.8 10.8 County Mariposa 16.8 10.8 County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8 County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8 County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8 County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8 County Merced 16.8 10.8 County Modoc 16.8 10.8 County Mono 16.8 10.8 County Monterey 16.8 10.8 County Napa 10.8 10.8 City Council 18 - 37 10/3/2023 County Nevada 16.8 10.8 County Orange 19.8 14.7 County Placer -Lake 16.8 10.8 County Placer -Mountain 16.8 10.8 County Placer- 16.8 10.8 County Plumas 16.8 10.8 County Riverside- 16.8 10.8 County Riverside- 19.8 14.7 County Riverside -Salton 14.6 11 County Riverside -South 19.8 14.7 County Sacramento 15 10 County San Benito 16.8 10.8 County San Bernardino- 16.8 10.8 County San Bernardino- 19.8 14.7 County San Diego 16.8 10.8 County San Francisco 10.8 10.8 County San Joaquin 16.8 10.8 County San Luis Obispo 13 13 County San Mateo 10.8 10.8 County Santa Barbara- 8.3 8.3 County Santa Barbara- 8.3 8.3 County Santa Clara 10.8 10.8 County Santa Cruz 16.8 10.8 County Shasta 16.8 10.8 County Sierra 16.8 10.8 County Siskiyou 16.8 10.8 County Solano- 15 10 County Solano-San 16.8 10.8 County Sonoma -North 16.8 10.8 County Sonoma -San 10.8 10.8 County Stanislaus 16.8 10.8 County Sutter 16.8 10.8 County Tehama 16.8 10.8 County Trinity 16.8 10.8 County Tulare 16.8 10.8 County Tuolumne 16.8 10.8 County Ventura 16.8 10.8 County Yolo 15 10 County Yuba 16.8 10.8 Statewide Statewide 16.8 10.8 City Council 18 - 38 10/3/2023 Worker Air Basin Great Basin Valleys Lake County Lake Tahoe Mojave Desert Mountain Counties North Central Coast North Coast Northeast Plateau Sacramento Valley Salton Sea San Diego San Francisco Bay Area San Joaquin Valley South Central Coast South Coast Average Mininum Maximum Range igth by Air Basin Rural (miles) 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 17.1 16.8 16.8 16.8 14.6 16.8 10.8 16.8 16.8 19.8 16.47 10.80 19.80 9.00 Urban (miles) 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 12.3 10.8 10.8 10.8 11 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 14.7 11.17 10.80 14.70 3.90 City Council 18 - 39 10/3/2023 Attachment B CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 I 0 ---------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- - h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 + High = — — ;-------------------- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------ _------------------------------ Hotel 50.00 + = — -- —;------------- ------- Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 -----------y----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + = --- ---—;-------------------- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + = --- --------- —;------------- Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 -----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------=-----------------------i------------------+--------------- Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 I 2789 ------------------------------ _------------------------------ _----------------------------- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data City Council 18 — 40 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass IT 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-----------------------------t-------------------------- FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------t-------------------------- NumberWood r 1.25 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ t----------------------------- t------------------------- NumberWood 48.75 0.00 ---------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------t------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 158.37 79.82 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------t------------------------- ST_TR r 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 94.36 63.99 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 49.97 10.74 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 6.07 6.16 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- SU_TR 5.86 4.18 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 1.05 0.69 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- SU_TR 131.84 78.27 City Council 18 — 41 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- SU_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary City Council 18 - 42 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 •i 0.1713 i 1.8242 � 1.1662 i 2.4000e- 0.4169 0.0817 i 0.4986 0.1795 i 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 i 213.1969 213.1969 i 0.0601 0.0000 214.6993 003 ------------- 2022 •i 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 i 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 i � i � � i � i � � i � '� i i i i i i i i • 1 6 i 6 i i i 7 2023 •i 0.6148 i 3.3649 � 5.6747 i 0.0178 � 1.1963 � 0.0996 i 1.2959 � 0.3203 i 0.0935 0.4138 � 0.0000 i 1,627.529 1,627.529 i 0.1185 1 0.0000 1 1,630.492 '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 5 2024 •1 4.1619 i 0.1335 0.2810 i 5.9000e- 0.0325 6.4700e- i 0.0390 8.6300e- i 6.0400e- 0.0147 0.0000 i 52.9078 52.9078 i 8.0200e- 0.0000 1 53.1082 004 003 003 003 : 003 i Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 6 6 7 City Council 18 - 43 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 •i 0.1713 i 1.8242 � 1.1662 i 2.4000e- 0.4169 0.0817 i 0.4986 0.1795 i 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 i 213.1967 � 213.1967 i 0.0601 0.0000 214.6991 003 2022 •i 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 i 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 i � i � � i � i � � i 3 i 3 i i i 3 2023 •i 0.6148 i 3.3648 5.6747 i 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 i 1.2959 0.3203 i 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 i 1,627.529 1,627.529 i 0.1185 1 0.0000 11,630.492 2024 •1 4.1619 i 0.1335 0.2810 i 5.9000e- 0.0325 6.4700e- i 0.0390 8.6300e- i 6.0400e- 0.0147 0.0000 i 52.9077 52.9077 i 8.0200e- 0.0000 I 53.1082 004 003 003 003 : 003 i Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 3 3 3 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4103 1.4103 2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3613 1.3613 3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1985 1.1985 4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1921 1.1921 5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1918 1.1918 6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0774 1.0774 7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 1.0320 1.0320 8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 1.0260 1.0260 City Council 18 - 44 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 1.0265 1.0265 10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8857 2.8857 11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6207 1.6207 Highest 2.8857 2.8857 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 i 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 i 220.9670 i 0.0201 i 3.7400e- 1 222.5835 i i Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 i 0.7770 7.6200e- i i 0.0966 i 0.0966 i i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1 3,896.073 i 3,896.073 i 0.1303 1 0.0468 1 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 3 ;� 1 i i i 1 Mobile •1 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 1 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 1 0.0000 1 7,629.016 '1 6 i 6 i i 1 2 ;1 1 Waste •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 1 0.0000 1 514.8354 ;1 1 ------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ----------------------*------r------ ---------------j-------*------- Water •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 � 29.1632 i 556.6420 � 585.8052 i 3.0183 � 0.0755 1 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 12,531.15 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47 j j j j 07 19 j 51 City Council 18 - 45 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 10.3804 i 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 � i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 i Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 0.7770 i 7.6200e- 0.0966 i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 i 3,896.073 3,896.073 i 0.1303 0.0468 13,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i i 3 Mobile •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 17,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2 Waste •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 1514.8354 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 29.1632 i 556.6420 585.8052 i 3.0183 0.0755 1683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 12,531.15 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47 07 19 51 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase City Council 18 - 46 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition +Demolition 19/1/2021 110/12/2021 5: 30: + i 2 :Site Preparation +Site Preparation 110/13/2021 :11/9/2021 5: 20: + i 3 •Grading +Grading 111/10/2021 :1/11/2022 5: 45: + i 4 -Building Construction +Building Construction 11/12/2022 :12/12/2023 5: 500: + i 5 -Paving +Paving 112/13/2023 :1/30/2024 5: 35: + i 6 -Architectural Coating -Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5. 35, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment City Council 18 — 47 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders 1 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT City Council 18 — 48 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 458.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix EHHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_-_, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.001 --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix ----------r--------_ ;HDT_Mix (HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix *- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 14.70: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- T ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 14.70: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i , , , , 0.0496 , 0.0000 , 0.0496 , 7.5100e- , 0.0000 ; 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0475 , 0.4716 , 0.3235 , 5.8000e- , , 0.0233 , 0.0233 , , 0.0216 ; 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0012 , 51.0012 , 0.0144 , 0.0000 1 51.3601 004 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 004 003 City Council 18 - 49 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 11 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 1.9300e- i 0.0634 i 0.0148 1.8000e- i 3.9400e- 1.9000e- 4.1300e- i 1.0800e- 1.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 i 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- i 0.0000 i 17.4869 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 9.7000e- 7.5000e- 8.5100e- 2.000Oe- 2.4700e- 2.000Oe- 2.4900e- 6.5000e- 2.000Oe- 6.7000e- 0.0000 i 2.2251 2.2251 7.000Oe- 0.0000 I 2.2267 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i I I 005 I Total 2.9000e- 0.0641 0.0233 2.000Oe- 6.4100e- 2.1000e- 6.6200e- 1.7300e- 2.000Oe- 1.9300e- 0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e- 0.0000 19.7136 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 i 7.5100e- 0.0000 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003 Off -Road •i 0.0475 i 0.4716 i 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 i 0.0000 i 51.3600 004 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 004 003 1 j City Council 18 - 50 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 12 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Hauling •I 1.9300e- I 0.0634 I 0.0148 11.8000e- 13.9400e- I 1.9000e- 14.1300e- I 1.0800e- 11.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 I 17.4566 I 17.4566 11.2100e- I 0.0000 i 17.4869 �I 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 004 I 003 I 003 I 004 003003 I I- I I I I I I I I I I I Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I- I I I Worker •I 9.7000e- 6.7000e- � 0.0000 I 2.2251 2.2251 0.0000 I 2.2267 17.5000e- 18.5100e- 12.00OOe- 12.4700e- 12.00OOe- 12.4900e- 16.5000e- 12.00OOe- I 17.00OOe- I 'I 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 I I 005 I Total 2.9000e- 0.0641 0.0233 2.00OOe- 6.4100e- 2.1000e- 6.6200e- 1.7300e- 2.00OOe- 1.9300e- 0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e- 0.0000 19.7136 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7061 004 I I I I 1 I I I I Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e- 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 004 City Council 18 - 51 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 13 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Hauling •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I • I- I I I I I I I I I I I Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I • Worker •I 7.7000e- 1.9700e- 5.4000e- 0.0000 I 1.7801 1.7801 0.0000 I 1.7814 16.000Oe- 16.8100e- 12.000Oe- I 12.000Oe- 11.9900e- 15.2000e- 11.000Oe- I 15.000Oe- I 'I 'I 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 I 005 I I I I I I I I 1 • Total 7.7000e- 6.000Oe- 6.8100e- 2.000Oe- 1.9700e- 2.000Oe- 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.000Oe- 5.4000e- 0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.000Oe- 0.0000 1.7814 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;� I I I I I I I 1 • � I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I I 33.4357 I I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7060 004 I I I I 1 • I I I I Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e- 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 004 City Council 18 - 52 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 14 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 -------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 7.7000e- 6.00OOe- 6.8100e- 2.00OOe- 1.9700e- 2.00OOe- 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.00OOe- 5.4000e- 0.0000 i 1.7801 1.7801 5.00OOe- 0.0000 I 1.7814 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 7.7000e- 6.00OOe- 6.8100e- 2.00OOe- 1.9700e- 2.00OOe- 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.00OOe- 5.4000e- 0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.00OOe- 0.0000 1.7814 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3776 003 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 003 City Council 18 - 53 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 15 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 4.1600e- 3.000Oe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.000Oe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 i 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 I 3.7607 i i i i i 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 i Total 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 4.1600e- 3.000Oe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.000Oe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 3.7607 11 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3775 003 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 003 City Council 18 - 54 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 16 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.00OOe- 4.1600e- 3.00OOe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.00OOe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 i 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 I 3.7607 i i i i i 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 i Total 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.00OOe- 4.1600e- 3.00OOe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.00OOe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 3.7607 11 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 i 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 0.0807 5.7200e- 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 19.2414 004 003 003 003 City Council 18 - 55 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 17 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.6679 0.6679 2.000Oe- 0.0000 I 0.6684 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.0000e- 7.7000e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6684 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 i 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 0.0807 5.7200e- 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 19.2414 004 003 003 003 City Council 18 - 56 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 2.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.6679 0.6679 2.00OOe- 0.0000 I 0.6684 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 2.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6684 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 2.0700 i 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 i i 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 i 0.0000 1294.8881 003 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 003 City Council 18 - 57 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------- Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 1442.6435 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.4088 i 0.3066 i 3.5305 0.0107 i 1.1103 8.8700e- 1.1192 i 0.2949 8.1700e- 0.3031 0.0000 i 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 i 0.0000 1967.4773 003 003 Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 1,408.795 1,408.795 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120 [777000 2 2 8 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 i 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 i 0.0000 1294.8877 003 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 003 City Council 18 - 58 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------- Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 1442.6435 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.4088 i 0.3066 i 3.5305 0.0107 i 1.1103 8.8700e- 1.1192 i 0.2949 8.1700e- 0.3031 0.0000 i 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 i 0.0000 1967.4773 003 003 Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 1,408.795 1,408.795 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120 [777000 2 2 8 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 1286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 i 0.0000 1287.9814 003j Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 003 j City Council 18 - 59 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 1418.5624 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.3753 i 0.2708 i 3.1696 0.0101 i 1.0840 8.4100e- 1.0924 i 0.2879 7.7400e- 0.2957 0.0000 i 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 i 0.0000 1909.9291 003 003 Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e- 1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e- 1,327.336 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491 j 003 j j 003 j [-377000 9 [1,327.336 9 j 6 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 1286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 i 0.0000 1287.9811 i i i i i • i i i i 003j Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 003 j City Council 18 - 60 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 22 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 1418.5624 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.3753 i 0.2708 i 3.1696 0.0101 i 1.0840 8.4100e- 1.0924 i 0.2879 7.7400e- 0.2957 0.0000 i 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 i 0.0000 1909.9291 003 003 Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e- 1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e- 1,327.336 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491 j 003 j j 003 j [-377000 9 [1,327.336 9 j 6 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 m City Council 18 - 61 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 23 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ---------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ ----�-------------'--------------� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.000Oe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.8963 0.8963 2.000Oe- 0.0000 I 0.8968 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.0000e- 1.0700e- 1.000Oe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.8968 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 m City Council 18 - 62 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 24 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ------------------------ ---------------------'------------------------ --+ ----� -------------'----00- ----00 1 000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.00OOe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.00OOe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.8963 0.8963 2.00OOe- 0.0000 I 0.8968 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.00OOe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.00OOe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.8968 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0109 i 0.1048 0.1609 i 2.5000e- i i 5.1500e- i 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- i 0.0000 i 22.2073 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 22.2073 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 City Council 18 - 63 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 25 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.000Oe- 1.8100e- 1.000Oe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.000Oe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 1.4697 1.4697 4.000Oe- 0.0000 I 1.4706 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 I I 005 I Total 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.000Oe- 1.8100e- 1.000Oe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.000Oe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.000Oe- 0.0000 1.4706 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 i 22.2073 i i i •� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 m City Council 18 - 64 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 26 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 -------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.00OOe- 1.8100e- 1.00OOe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.00OOe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 1.4697 1.4697 4.00OOe- 0.0000 I 1.4706 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 I I 005 I Total 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.00OOe- 1.8100e- 1.00OOe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.00OOe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.00OOe- 0.0000 1.4706 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 4.4745 005 003 003 003 003 004 City Council 18 - 65 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 27 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ---------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ - -------------'--.--�-------T Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 '� I '� • I • Worker •i 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 i 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 0.0000 I 24.9558 i i i i � i 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1007 0.0000 24.9558 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 4.4745 005 003 003 003 003 004 City Council 18 - 66 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I Worker •i 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 i 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 0.0000 I 24.9558 i i i i � i 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1007 0.0000 24.9558 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile City Council 18 - 67 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 i 7.7979 i 0.0580 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 � 7,620.498 � 0.3407 i 0.0000 i 7,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 • 7,620.498 • 0.3407 - 0.0000 • 7,629.016 6 6 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ......................................----------- ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information City Council 18 - 68 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy City Council 18 - 69 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 0.0000 1 I 1 0.0000 1 I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 I I 12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037 I 1 0.0215 i 2,521.635 Mitigated 5 I 5 1 I 1 6 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 Electricity •1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 0.0000 1 I 1 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 I 12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037 I 1 0.0215 2,521.635 Unmitigated 5 1 5 1 I 1 6 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.1398I 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 I 0.0254 1 1,391.647 Miti 1 I 003 7 7 8gated I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- - 0.0966 0.0966 - 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 • 1,383.426 • 0.0265 - 0.0254 • 1,391.647 Unmitigated 003 7 7 8 City Council 18 - 70 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise 1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 ; 1 1 r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T Apartments Mid i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise +007 ; 1 I I 003 _ 1 ; 1 r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T General Office Building i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . I 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1 '1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit 8.30736e •1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant) 1 +006 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . I 1 1 003 1 003 1 ----------- Hotel ------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�-------�-------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1.74095e 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . I 1 1 003 1 003 1 __ " '-" "I Quality 1 j-------i------- i ------- i------- i-------- ------- i------- i---------------. 1 -------------- -------' r------71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 1 99.0993 Restaurant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_ Regional Shopping Centers I 91840 .1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . I 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 003 8 8 8 City Council 18 - 71 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise 1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 004 1 004 1 1 ; 1 r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T Apartments Mid i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise +007 ; 1 I I 003 _ 1 ; 1 r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T General Office Building i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . I 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1 '1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit 8.30736e .1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant) 1 +006 i 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . I 1 1 003 1 003 1 ----------- Hotel ------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�------- -------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , �____--'I-------1 1 1 ------- 1.74095e •1 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . I 1 1 003 1 003 1 -""'-""i Quality '1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------��1 �-------�-------�-------1 r-------------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ____--'I-------1 1 1 T_----- 71 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 99.0993 Restaurant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_ Regional Shopping Centers I 91840 •1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 ; 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . I 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 003 8 8 j j 8 City Council 18 - 72 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978 Rise 003 004 i Apartments Mid • ---------------- 13.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086 Rise +006 9 I i I 9 General Office -j--------j------- I 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 1186.9165 Building 003 003 High Turnover (Sit -j- - - - - --- - - - - - - 1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135 Down Restaurant) i +006 003 ---r--- Hotel ------- *------- ---ii•--------------- I 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 1175.9672 003 003 --- Quality •�- - - - - --- r------ii------- *------- 353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141 Restaurant ;1 I 003 i 004 Regional 756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- T 241.7395 Shopping Center 003 i 003 Total 2,512.646 0.1037 0.0215 2:521.635 5 6 City Council 18 - 73 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978 Rise 003 004 Apartments Mid • ---------------- 13.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086 Rise +006 9 I i I 9 General Office -j--------j------- I 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 186.9165 Building 003 003 High Turnover (Sit -j- - - - - --- - - - - - - 1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135 Down Restaurant) i +006 003 ---r--- Hotel ---ii•--------------- ------- *------- I 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 1175.9672 003 003 --- Quality •�- - - - - --- r------ii------- *------- 353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141 Restaurant ;1 003 i 004 Regional -------------- 756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- 241.7395 Shopping Center 003 i 003 Total 2,512.646 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635 5 6 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area City Council 18 - 74 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 � 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 � 3.7400e- 1222.5835 003 003 Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e- - 0.0714 - 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 - 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.4137 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 Coating -----------:'---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------*------- Consumer �I 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- i 0.0143 i 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- 1205.3295 •� 003 003 003 i . Landscaping •i 0.3096 I 0.1187 10.3054 15.4000e- I 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 I 17.2540 i 004 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e- 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 City Council 18 - 75 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.4137 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- 1205.3295 003 003 003 i Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 i 0.0161 0.0000 I 17.2540 004 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e- 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 11 003 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water City Council 18 - 76 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 585.8052 I 3.0183 i 0.0755 1683.7567 - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4------------------------------- - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 City Council 18 — 77 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low 1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471 Rise 1.02688 ;1 1 003 '-------- -------- ------- Apartments Mid 1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363 Rise 40.0485 -- - - - --- - - - - - - General Office 1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- 1 61.6019 Building 4.90201 ;1 i i 003 --r- 1 1 ----- ------- -j-------------- * - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit 10.9272 / •i 51.2702 1 0.3580 1 8.8200e- 62.8482 Down Restaurant) i 0.697482 ;1 i i 003 ' -------- ------- Hotel 1 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 1 0.0416 1 1.0300e- 1 7.5079 1 0.140927 '1 i i 003 1 -- - - - - --- - - - - - - Quality 2.42827 / •i 11.3934 1 0.0796 1 1.9600e- 13.9663 Restaurant i 0.154996 ;1 i i 003 ---------- --------------- Regional 4.14806 / •i 27.5250 1 0.1363 1 3.4200e- 31.9490 Shopping Center 2.54236 ;1 i i 003 Total 585.8052 j 3.0183 j 0.0755 683.7567 City Council 18 - 78 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low 1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471 Rise 1.02688 ;1 1 003 '-------- -------- ------- Apartments Mid 1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363 Rise 40.0485 -- - - - --- - - - - - - General Office 1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- 1 61.6019 Building 4.90201 ;1 i i 003 --r- 1 1 ----- ------- -j--------------- * - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit 10.9272 / •i 51.2702 1 0.3580 1 8.8200e- 62.8482 Down Restaurant) i 0.697482 ;1 i i 003 ' -------- ------- Hotel 1 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 1 0.0416 1 1.0300e- 1 7.5079 1 0.140927 '1 i i 003 1 -- - - - - --- - - - - - - Quality 2.42827 / •i 11.3934 1 0.0796 1 1.9600e- 13.9663 Restaurant i 0.154996 ;1 i i 003 ---------- --------------- Regional 4.14806 / •i 27.5250 1 0.1363 1 3.4200e- 31.9490 Shopping Center 2.54236 ;1 i i 003 Total 585.8052 j 3.0183 j 0.0755 683.7567 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste City Council 18 - 79 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual CategoryNear Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 207.8079 1 12.2811 1 0.0000 1 514.8354 - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------+------------------------------ - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 City Council 18 — 80 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low 11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834 Rise •� i • '-------'------- Apartments Mid I 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513 Rise •� -------- i -------- ------- '------- GeneralOffice I 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464 Building i •� --r ------ �i------- '------- '------- *------- High Turnover (Sit 428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430 Down Restaurant) •� i • '-------'------- Hotel I 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694 __ i i Quality 7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712 Restaurant i •� • -------- ------- 58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706 Shopping Center i •� Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 City Council 18 - 81 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low 11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834 Rise •� i • '-------'------- Apartments Mid I 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513 Rise •� -------- i -------- ------- '------- GeneralOffice I 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 I 21.0464 Building i •� --r ------ �i------- '------- '------- *------- High Turnover (Sit 428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430 Down Restaurant) •� i '-------'------- Hotel I 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694 __ i i Quality 7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712 Restaurant i •� • - ' - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - Regional 58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706 Shopping Center i •� Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type City Council 18 - 82 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation City Council 18 — 83 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 I 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 High ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 + -----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 ------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 _ --- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + ----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 ---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments artments Mid Rise 975.00 + ----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 I 2789 ------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data City Council 18 — 84 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass IT 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-----------------------------t-------------------------- FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------t-------------------------- NumberWood r 1.25 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ t----------------------------- t------------------------- NumberWood 48.75 0.00 ---------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------t------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 158.37 79.82 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------t------------------------- ST_TR r 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 94.36 63.99 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 49.97 10.74 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 6.07 6.16 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- SU_TR 5.86 4.18 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 1.05 0.69 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- SU_TR 131.84 78.27 City Council 18 — 85 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- SU_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary City Council 18 - 86 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 i 6,234.797 6,234.797 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535 i i i i i 4 i 4 i i 2 2022 •i 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 i 15,251.56 15,251.56 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52 i i i i i •� 74 74 i 88 2023 •i 4.8957 i 26.3317 46.7567 i 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 i 10.6482 2.6381 i 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 i 14,807.52 14,807.52 i 1.0250 0.0000 114,833.15 2024 •1 237.1630 i 9.5575 15.1043 i 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 i 1.8628 0.4743 i 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 i 2,361.398 2,361.398 i 0.7177 0.0000 12,379.342 9 i 9 i i i 1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 15,251.56 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52 11 74 74 88 City Council 18 - 87 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2769 i 46.4588 31.6840 i 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 i 20.3135 9.9840 i 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 i 6,234.797 6,234.797 i 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535 4 i 4 i i 2 2022 •i 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 i 15,251.56 15,251.56 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52 i i i i i •� 74 74 i 88 2023 •i 4.8957 i 26.3317 46.7567 i 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 i 10.6482 2.6381 i 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 i 14,807.52 14,807.52 i 1.0250 0.0000 114,833.15 2024 •1 237.1630 i 9.5575 15.1043 i 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 i 1.8628 0.4743 i 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 i 2,361.398 2,361.398 i 0.7177 0.0000 12,379.342 9 i 9 i i i 1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 15,251.56 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52 74 74 88 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction City Council 18 - 88 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Page 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 1 0.3300 18,259.11 i i � � i � i i '� 50 50 1 i 92 I • --------------- Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 18,405.638 2 i 2 i i i 7 Mobile •1 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 i 46.2951 12.2950 i 0.3119 12.6070 i 50,306.60 50,306.60 i 2.1807 50,361.12 08 34 i 34 � I I Total 41.1168 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 76,811.18 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87 11 762 16 16 86 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 88.4430 i 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 i 0.4874 0.3300 118,259.11 �� ■ 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 18,405.638 '� i i i i i i i i i i i ■ 2 2 i 7 Mobile 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 i 46.2951 12.2950 i 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 i 2.1807 150,361.12 150,306.60 ■ 34 34 i 08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 76,811.18 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87 16 16 86 City Council 18 - 89 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition !9/1/2021 110/12/2021 51 30: i i _ 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation ! 10/13/2021 111/9/2021 1 51 20: i i _ 3 •Grading +Grading !11/10/2021 11/11/2022 1 51 45: i i _ 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction ! 1/12/2022 :12/12/2023 1 51 500: i i _ 5 :Paving +Paving ! 12/13/2023 11/30/2024 1 51 35: + I 1 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -1/31/2024 -3/19/2024 5, 35- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment City Council 18 — 90 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders 1 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT City Council 18 — 91 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00" 0.001 458.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix IHDT_Mix (HHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_--, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.001 --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix ----------r--------_ ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix *- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 14.70: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 14.70: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 3.3074 , 0.0000 , 3.3074 , 0.5008 , 0.0000 ; 0.5008 � 1 , 0.0000 , , 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 , 31.4407 , 21.5650 , 0.0388 , , 1.5513 , 1.5513 , , 1.4411 ; 1.4411 i 3,747.944 , 3,747.944 , 1.0549 , 1 3,774.317 9 i 9 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3:774.317 9 9 4 City Council 18 - 92 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 i 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 1 1,294.433 i i � i i • � � i '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 7 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0643 i 0.0442 i 0.6042 1.7100e- i 0.1677 1.3500e- 0.1690 i 0.0445 1.2500e- 0.0457 i 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e- i 1 170.9413 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.0927 1,465.375 f-77771,463.056 8 17,463.056 8 1 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 i 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 i 31.4407 i 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 i 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 i 1 3,774.317 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 9 9 i 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 9 9 4 City Council 18 - 93 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 i 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 1 1,294.433 i i � i i • � � i '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 7 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0643 i 0.0442 i 0.6042 1.7100e- i 0.1677 1.3500e- 0.1690 i 0.0445 1.2500e- 0.0457 i 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e- i 1 170.9413 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.0927 1,465.375 f-77771,463.056 8 17,463.056 8 1 0 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 � 0.0380 i � 2.0445 � 2.0445 i � 1.8809 � 1.8809 � i 3,685.656 � 3,685.656 � 1.1920 i 1 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i i • g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 City Council 18 - 94 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0772 i 0.0530 i 0.7250 2.0600e- i 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 i 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- i 1205.1296 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e- 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- 205.1296 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 i g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 City Council 18 - 95 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0772 i 0.0530 i 0.7250 2.0600e- i 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 i 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- i 1205.1296 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e- 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- 205.1296 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 � 0.0620 i � 1.9853 � 1.9853 i � 1.8265 � 1.8265 � i 6,007.043 � 6,007.043 � 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 777 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 City Council 18 - 96 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0857 i 0.0589 i 0.8056 2.2900e- i 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 i 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- i 1227.9217 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e- 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- 227.9217 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 i 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 City Council 18 - 97 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0857 i 0.0589 i 0.8056 2.2900e- i 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 i 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- i 1227.9217 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e- 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- 227.9217 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 � 0.0621 i � 1.6349 � 1.6349 i � 1.5041 1.5041 � i 6,011.410 � 6,011.410 � 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i i i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 City Council 18 - 98 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0803 i 0.0532 i 0.7432 2.2100e- i 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 i 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- i 1219.8941 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- 219.8941 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 City Council 18 - 99 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0803 i 0.0532 i 0.7432 2.2100e- i 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 i 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- i 1219.8941 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- 219.8941 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 i 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 City Council 18 - 100 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.4079 i 13.2032 i 3.4341 � 0.0364 i 0.9155 � 0.0248 0.9404 i 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 i 13,902.138 2 i 2 i i i 4 Worker •i 3.2162 i 2.1318 i 29.7654 0.0883 i 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 i 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 i 8,800.685 8,800.685 0.2429 i 18,806.758 7 i 7 i i i 2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 12,697.23 0.4665 12,708.89 j j j j [77712,697.23 39 39 j 66 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 City Council 18 - 101 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.4079 i 13.2032 i 3.4341 � 0.0364 i 0.9155 � 0.0248 0.9404 i 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 i 13,902.138 2 i 2 i i i 4 Worker •i 3.2162 i 2.1318 i 29.7654 0.0883 i 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 i 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 i 8,800.685 8,800.685 0.2429 i 18,806.758 7 i 7 i i i 2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 12,697.23 0.4665 12,708.89 j j j j [77712,697.23 39 39 j 66 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 12,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 i i i i i i i i 9 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.658T 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 j j j j j j 9 9 1 City Council 18 - 102 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3027 i 10.0181 i 3.1014 0.0352 i 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 i 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 i 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 i 13,778.830 2 i 2 i i i 0 Worker •i 3.0203 i 1.9287 i 27.4113 0.0851 i 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 i 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8,478.440 0.2190 i 18,483.916 8 i 8 i i i 0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 12,252.31 0.4172 12,262.74 70 70 60 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 9 i 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 11 9 9 1 City Council 18 - 103 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3027 i 10.0181 i 3.1014 0.0352 i 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 i 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 i 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 i 13,778.830 2 i 2 i i 1 0 Worker •i 3.0203 i 1.9287 i 27.4113 0.0851 i 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 i 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8,478.440 0.2190 i 18,483.916 8 i 8 i i i 0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 12,252.31 0.4172 12,262.74 70 70 60 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i 12,225.433 '� i i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 6 • Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 City Council 18 - 104 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0566 i 0.0361 i 0.5133 1.5900e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- i 1158.8748 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- 158.8748 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 City Council 18 - 105 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0566 i 0.0361 i 0.5133 1.5900e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- i 1158.8748 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- 158.8748 003 003 003 003 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 City Council 18 - 106 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0535 i 0.0329 i 0.4785 1.5400e- i 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 i 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- i 1153.9458 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e- 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- 153.9458 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 i 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 City Council 18 - 107 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0535 i 0.0329 i 0.4785 1.5400e- i 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 i 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- i 1153.9458 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e- 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- 153.9458 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •i 236.4115 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 i 2.9700e- i i 0.0609 i 0.0609 � i 0.0609 � 0.0609 � i 281.4481 i 281.4481 � 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 City Council 18 - 108 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 ---------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ ------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.5707 i 0.3513 i 5.1044 0.0165 i 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 i 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 i 1,641.085 1,641.085 0.0401 i 11,642.088 2 i 2 i i i 6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 777 1,641.085 1,641.085 0.0401 1,642.088 2 2 6 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •1 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 City Council 18 - 109 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � ---------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+ ------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.5707 i 0.3513 i 5.1044 0.0165 i 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 i 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 i 1,641.085 1,641.085 0.0401 i 11,642.088 2 i 2 i i i 6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 777 1,641.085 1,641.085 0.0401 1,642.088 2 2 6 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile City Council 18 -110 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 i 45.9592 i 0.3360 46.2951 i 12.2950 � 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 50,306.60 2.1807 i i 50,361.12 •� . 34 34 i 08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 • 50,306.60 • 2.1807 - 50,361.12 34 34 08 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ......................................----------- ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information City Council 18 -111 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy City Council 18 -112 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 i 4.2573 0.0418 i i 0.5292 0.5292 i i 0.5292 0.5292 + i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 i 0.1532 1 8,405.638 Mitigated ;i . I 2 2 i 7 NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 • 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 • 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2 7 City Council 18 —113 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low 1 1119.16 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- 1 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 1 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1------------------------------------------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------ � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1283.42 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- 1 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 •1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 1 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r-------1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel 1 4769.72 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 1 564.4782 1 1 1 1 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 Quality 1 5057.75 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � v 1 1 1 1 T""--- 251.616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 City Council 18 -114 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low I 1.11916 •i 0.0121 i 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 131.6662 � 131.6662 i 2.5200e- i 2.4100e- 132.4486 Rise 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 i Apartments Mid I 35.7843 •1 0.3859 i 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 i 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4,209.916 i 0.0807 i 0.0772 14,234.933 '� Rise i i i i i i i i i 4 i 4 i i i 9 General Office I 1.28342 •i 0.0138 i 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e- i 9.5600e- i 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- i 150.9911 150.9911 i 2.8900e- i 2.7700e- 1151.8884 Building 004 003 003 003 003 i 003 003 i ---------- High Turnover (Sit -------------'---------------------------------- '--------- ------------------------------ I 22.7599 •i 0.2455 i 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 i 0.1696 i 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 i 2,677.634 2,677.634 i 0.0513 i 0.0491 12,693.546 Down Restaurant) 2 2 i 0 Hotel I 4.76972 •1 0.0514 i 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e- 0.0355 i 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 i 0.0108 i 0.0103 1564.4782 003 --------- Quality ------------------------i �i 595.0298 � 595.0298 i 0.0114 i 0.0109 598.5658 I 5.05775 i 0.0545 i 0.4959 � 0.4165 � 2.9800e- i � 0.0377 i 0.0377 � � 0.0377 0.0377 Restaurant '��--------------'-----------------------------------'-------- � i i 003 i 'I ---------------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------ Regional 10.251616 •i 2.7100e- i 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- i 1.8700e- i 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- i 29.6019 29.6019 i 5.7000e- i 5.4000e- I 29.7778 Shopping Center 003 004 003 003 003 003 i 004 004 i Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area City Council 18 -115 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 � 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 i i 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 118,259.11 50 50 92 -------------i I Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 • 18,148.59 - 0.4874 • 0.3300 • 18,259.11 50 50 92 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating•' ' i i- -----------:'---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------*------- Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products •' . ' i Hearth •i 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 i i i i i i i 118,106.96 Landscaping •i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 1152.1542 003 i i i i i i i i i • Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 City Council 18 -116 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 1.6500 i 14.1000 6.0000 i 0.0900 1.1400 i 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 i 18,000.00 18,000.00 i 0.3450 1 0.3300 118,106.96 ---- -- - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --- - -- ------------------------------ Landscaping i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 152.1542 003 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 j j F-777000 50 50 j 92 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment City Council 18 -117 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation City Council 18 —118 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 I 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 High ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 + -----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 ------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 _ --- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + ----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 ---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments artments Mid Rise 975.00 + ----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 I 2789 ------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data City Council 18 —119 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass IT 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-----------------------------t-------------------------- FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------t-------------------------- NumberWood r 1.25 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ t----------------------------- t------------------------- NumberWood 48.75 0.00 ---------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------t------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 158.37 79.82 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------t------------------------- ST_TR r 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 94.36 63.99 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 49.97 10.74 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 6.07 6.16 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- SU_TR 5.86 4.18 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 1.05 0.69 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- SU_TR 131.84 78.27 City Council 18 — 120 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- SU_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary City Council 18 - 121 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2865 i 46.4651 31.6150 i 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 i 20.3135 9.9840 i 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 i 6,221.493 6,221.493 i 1.9491 � 0.0000 6,270.221 7 i 7 i i 4 2022 •i 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 i 14,630.30 14,630.30 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26 i i i i i 99 99 63 2023 •i 5.2705 i 26.4914 � 44.5936 i 0.1413 � 9.8688 � 0.7800 i 10.6488 � 2.6381 i 0.7328 3.3708 � 0.0000 i 14,210.34 � 14,210.34 i 1.0230 1 0.0000 114,235.91 •� i i i i i 24 I 24 I I 60 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*-------� -------------------------------*------- 2024 •1 237.2328 i 9.5610 15.0611 i 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 i 1.8628 0.4743 i 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 i 2,352.417 2,352.417 i 0.7175 0.0000 12,370.355 8 i 8 i i i 0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 14,630.30 1.94 99 0.0000 14,657.26 99 99 63 City Council 18 - 122 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2865 i 46.4651 31.6150 i 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 i 20.3135 9.9840 i 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 i 6,221.493 6,221.493 i 1.9491 � 0.0000 6,270.221 7 i 7 i i 4 2022 •i 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 i 14,630.30 14,630.30 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26 i i i i i 99 99 63 2023 •i 5.2705 i 26.4914 � 44.5936 i 0.1413 � 9.8688 � 0.7800 i 10.6488 � 2.6381 i 0.7328 3.3708 � 0.0000 i 14,210.34 � 14,210.34 i 1.0230 1 0.0000 114,235.91 •� i i i i i 24 I 24 I I 60 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*-------� -------------------------------*------- 2024 •1 237.2328 i 9.5610 15.0611 i 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 i 1.8628 0.4743 i 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 i 2,352.417 2,352.417 i 0.7175 0.0000 12,370.355 8 i 8 i i i 0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 14,630.30 1.94 99 0.0000 14,657.26 99 99 63 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction City Council 18 - 123 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Page 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 1 0.3300 18,259.11 i i � � i � i i 50 50 1 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 18,405.638 2 i 2 i i i 7 Mobile •i 9.5233 i 45.9914 � 110.0422 i 0.4681 � 45.9592 � 0.3373 i 46.2965 � 12.2950 i 0.3132 12.6083 i 47,917.80 � 47,917.80 i 2.1953 � 147,972.68 '� 05 05 i 39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 74,422.37 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44 87 87 17 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 88.4430 i 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 i 0.4874 0.3300 118,259.11 �� ■ 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 1 0.1532 18,405.638 '� i i i i i i i i i i i ■ 2 2 i 7 Mobile 9.5233 i 45.9914 110.0422 i 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 i 46.2965 12.2950 i 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 i 2.1953 47,972.68 147,917.80 ■ 05 05 i 39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 74,422.37 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44 87 87 17 City Council 18 - 124 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition !9/1/2021 110/12/2021 51 30: i i _ 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation ! 10/13/2021 111/9/2021 1 51 20: i i _ 3 •Grading +Grading !11/10/2021 11/11/2022 1 51 45: i i _ 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction ! 1/12/2022 :12/12/2023 1 51 500: i i _ 5 :Paving +Paving ! 12/13/2023 11/30/2024 1 51 35: + I 1 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -1/31/2024 -3/19/2024 5, 35- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment City Council 18 — 125 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders 1 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT City Council 18 — 126 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00" 0.001 458.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix IHDT_Mix (HHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_--, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.001 --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix ----------r--------_ ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix *- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 14.70: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 14.70: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 3.3074 , 0.0000 , 3.3074 , 0.5008 , 0.0000 ; 0.5008 � 1 , 0.0000 , , 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 , 31.4407 , 21.5650 , 0.0388 , , 1.5513 , 1.5513 , , 1.4411 ; 1.4411 i 3,747.944 , 3,747.944 , 1.0549 , 1 3,774.317 9 i 9 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3:774.317 9 9 4 City Council 18 - 127 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 i 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 1 1,272.125 i i � i � i • i '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 2 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0715 i 0.0489 i 0.5524 1.6100e- i 0.1677 1.3500e- 0.1690 i 0.0445 1.2500e- 0.0457 i 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e- i 1 160.9560 003 003 003 003 1 Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 1,430.693 0.0955 1,433.081 2 2 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 i 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 i 31.4407 i 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 i 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 i 1 3,774.317 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 9 9 4 City Council 18 - 128 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 i 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 1 1,272.125 i i � i � i • i '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 2 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0715 i 0.0489 i 0.5524 1.6100e- i 0.1677 1.3500e- 0.1690 i 0.0445 1.2500e- 0.0457 i 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e- i 1 160.9560 003 003 003 003 1 Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 1,430.693 0.0955 1,433.081 2 2 2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 � 0.0380 i � 2.0445 � 2.0445 i � 1.8809 � 1.8809 � i 3,685.656 � 3,685.656 � 1.1920 i 1 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i • g i 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 City Council 18 - 129 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0858 i 0.0587 i 0.6629 1.9400e- i 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 i 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- i 1193.1472 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e- 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- 193.1472 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 i g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 City Council 18 - 130 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0858 i 0.0587 i 0.6629 1.9400e- i 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 i 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- i 1193.1472 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e- 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- 193.1472 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 � 0.0620 i � 1.9853 � 1.9853 i � 1.8265 � 1.8265 � i 6,007.043 � 6,007.043 � 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 777 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 City Council 18 - 131 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0954 i 0.0652 i 0.7365 2.1500e- i 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 i 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- i 1214.6080 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e- 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- 214.6080 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 i 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 City Council 18 - 132 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0954 i 0.0652 i 0.7365 2.1500e- i 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 i 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- i 1214.6080 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e- 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- 214.6080 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 � 0.0621 i � 1.6349 � 1.6349 i � 1.5041 1.5041 � i 6,011.410 � 6,011.410 � 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 City Council 18 - 133 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0896 i 0.0589 i 0.6784 2.0800e- i 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 i 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- i 1207.0563 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- 207.0563 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 City Council 18 - 134 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0896 i 0.0589 i 0.6784 2.0800e- i 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 i 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- i 1207.0563 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- 207.0563 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 i 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 City Council 18 - 135 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.4284 i 13.1673 i 3.8005 � 0.0354 i 0.9155 � 0.0256 0.9412 i 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 i 13,795.028 0 i 0 i i i 3 Worker •i 3.5872 i 2.3593 i 27.1680 0.0832 i 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 i 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 i 8,286.901 8,286.901 0.2282 i 18,292.605 3 i 3 i i i 8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 12,075.97 0.4663 12,087.63 [77712,075.97 63 63 41 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 City Council 18 - 136 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.4284 i 13.1673 i 3.8005 � 0.0354 i 0.9155 � 0.0256 0.9412 i 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 i 13,795.028 0 i 0 i i i 3 Worker •i 3.5872 i 2.3593 i 27.1680 0.0832 i 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 i 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 i 8,286.901 8,286.901 0.2282 i 18,292.605 3 i 3 i i i 8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 12,075.97 0.4663 12,087.63 [77712,075.97 63 63 41 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 12,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 i i i i i i i i 9 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.658T 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 j j j j j j 9 9 1 City Council 18 - 137 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3183 i 9.9726 i 3.3771 0.0343 i 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 i 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 i 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 i 13,676.641 7 i 7 i i i 7 Worker •i 3.3795 i 2.1338 i 24.9725 0.0801 i 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 i 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 � 7,983.731 0.2055 i 17,988.868 8 i 8 i i i 3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 11,655.13 0.4151 11,665.50 j j j j 25 25 j 99 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 9 i 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 11 9 9 1 City Council 18 - 138 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3183 i 9.9726 i 3.3771 0.0343 i 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 i 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 i 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 i 13,676.641 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 7 Worker •i 3.3795 i 2.1338 i 24.9725 0.0801 i 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 i 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 � 7,983.731 0.2055 i 17,988.868 8 i 8 i i i 3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 11,655.13 0.4151 11,665.50 j j j j 25 25 j 99 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i 12,225.433 '� i i i i i i i i • 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 City Council 18 - 139 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0633 i 0.0400 i 0.4677 � 1.5000e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- i 1149.6043 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- 149.6043 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 City Council 18 - 140 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0633 i 0.0400 i 0.4677 � 1.5000e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- i 1149.6043 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- 149.6043 003 003 003 003 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 12,207.547 1 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 1 i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 City Council 18 - 141 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0601 i 0.0364 i 0.4354 1.4500e- i 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- i 1144.9587 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e- 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- 144.9587 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 i 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 City Council 18 - 142 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0601 i 0.0364 i 0.4354 1.4500e- i 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- i 1144.9587 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e- 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- 144.9587 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •i 236.4115 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 i 2.9700e- i i 0.0609 i 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 City Council 18 - 143 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.6406 i 0.3886 i 4.6439 0.0155 i 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 i 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 i 1,545.286 1,545.286 0.0376 i 11,546.226 0 i 0 i i i 2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 1,545.286 0.0376 7546.226 0 0 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •1 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I Off -Road •1 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 City Council 18 - 144 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.6406 i 0.3886 i 4.6439 0.0155 i 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 i 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 i 1,545.286 1,545.286 0.0376 i 11,546.226 0 i 0 i i i 2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 1,545.286 0.0376 7546.226 0 0 2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile City Council 18 - 145 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 9.5233 i 45.9914 i 110.0422 i 0.4681 45.9592 i 0.3373 , 46.2965 i 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 i 47,917.80 47,917.80 2.1953 i : 47,972.68 •� . 05 05 i 39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 - 47,917.80 47,917.80 • 2.1953 - 47,972.68 05 05 39 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ......................................----------- ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information City Council 18 - 146 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy City Council 18 - 147 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 i 4.2573 0.0418 i i 0.5292 0.5292 i i 0.5292 0.5292 + i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 i 0.1532 1 8,405.638 Mitigated ;i . I 2 2 i 7 NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 • 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 • 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2 7 City Council 18 — 148 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low 1 1119.16 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- 1 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 1 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1------------------------------------------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------ � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1283.42 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- 1 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 •1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 1 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r-------1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel 1 4769.72 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 1 564.4782 1 1 1 1 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 Quality 1 5057.75 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � v 1 1 1 1 T""--- 251.616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 City Council 18 - 149 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low I 1.11916 •i 0.0121 i 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 131.6662 � 131.6662 i 2.5200e- i 2.4100e- 132.4486 Rise 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 i Apartments Mid I 35.7843 •1 0.3859 i 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 i 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4,209.916 i 0.0807 i 0.0772 14,234.933 '� Rise i i i i i i i i i 4 i 4 i i i 9 General Office I 1.28342 •i 0.0138 i 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e- i 9.5600e- i 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- i 150.9911 150.9911 i 2.8900e- i 2.7700e- 1151.8884 Building 004 003 003 003 003 i 003 003 i ---------- High Turnover (Sit -------------'---------------------------------- '--------- ------------------------------ I 22.7599 •i 0.2455 i 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 i 0.1696 i 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 i 2,677.634 2,677.634 i 0.0513 i 0.0491 12,693.546 Down Restaurant) 2 2 i 0 Hotel I 4.76972 •1 0.0514 i 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e- 0.0355 i 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 i 0.0108 i 0.0103 1564.4782 003 --------- Quality ------------------------i �i 595.0298 � 595.0298 i 0.0114 i 0.0109 598.5658 I 5.05775 i 0.0545 i 0.4959 � 0.4165 � 2.9800e- i � 0.0377 i 0.0377 � � 0.0377 0.0377 Restaurant '��--------------'-----------------------------------'-------- � i i 003 i 'I ---------------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------ Regional 10.251616 •i 2.7100e- i 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- i 1.8700e- i 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- i 29.6019 29.6019 i 5.7000e- i 5.4000e- I 29.7778 Shopping Center 003 004 003 003 003 003 i 004 004 i Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area City Council 18 - 150 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 � 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 i i 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 118,259.11 50 50 92 -------------i I Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 • 18,148.59 - 0.4874 • 0.3300 • 18,259.11 50 50 92 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating•' ' i i- -----------:'---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------*------- Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products •' . ' i Hearth •i 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 i i i i i i i 118,106.96 Landscaping •i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 1152.1542 003 i i i i i i i i i • Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 City Council 18 - 151 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 1.6500 i 14.1000 6.0000 i 0.0900 1.1400 i 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 i 18,000.00 18,000.00 i 0.3450 1 0.3300 118,106.96 ---- -- - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --- - -- ------------------------------ Landscaping i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 152.1542 003 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 j j F-777000 50 50 j 92 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment City Council 18 - 152 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation City Council 18 — 153 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 I 0 ---------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- - h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 + High = — — ;-------------------- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------ _------------------------------ Hotel 50.00 + = — -- —;------------- ------- Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 -----------y----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + = --- ---—;-------------------- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + = --- --------- —;------------- Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 -----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------=-----------------------i------------------+--------------- Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 I 2789 ------------------------------ _------------------------------ _----------------------------- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data City Council 18 — 154 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces -----t-----------------------------t FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ t-----------------------------t-------------------------- NumberWood 1.25 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------t------------------------- NumberWood r 48.75 0.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ t----------------------------- t-------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- ST_TR 158.37 79.82 City Council 18 — 155 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- ST_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 49.97 10.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 6.07 6.16 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.86 4.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.95 3.20 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary City Council 18 - 156 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 •i 0.1704 i 1.8234 � 1.1577 i 2.3800e- 0.4141 � 0.0817 i 0.4958 0.1788 i 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 i 210.7654 210.7654 i 0.0600 0.0000 212.2661 003 2022 •i 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 i 1,418.655 1,418.655 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692 i i i i i 2023 •i 0.5190 i 3.2850 � 4.7678 i 0.0147 � 0.8497 � 0.0971 i 0.9468 � 0.2283 i 0.0912 0.3195 � 0.0000 i 1,342.441 1,342.441 i 0.1115 0.0000 11,345.229 '� i i i i i i i i • 2 i 2 i i 1 2024 •i 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.000Oe- 0.0221 6.3900e- 0.0285 5.8700e- 5.9700e- 0.0118 0.0000 i 44.6355 44.6355 7.8300e- 0.0000 44.8311 i i i i i 004 003 003 003 003 i Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 1,418.655 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692 11 4 4 5 City Council 18 - 157 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 •i 0.1704 i 1.8234 � 1.1577 i 2.3800e- 0.4141 � 0.0817 i 0.4958 0.1788 i 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 i 210.7651 210.7651 i 0.0600 0.0000 212.2658 003 2022 •i 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 i 1,418.655 1,418.655 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692 i i i i i 0 2023 •i 0.5190 i 3.2850 4.7678 i 0.0147 0.8497 0.0971 i 0.9468 0.2283 i 0.0912 0.3195 0.0000 i 1,342.440 1,342.440 i 0.1115 0.0000 11,345.228 9 i 9 i i 7 2024 •i 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.000Oe- 0.0221 6.3900e- 0.0285 5.8700e- 5.9700e- 0.0118 0.0000 i 44.6354 44.6354 7.8300e- 0.0000 44.8311 i i i i i 004 003 003 003 003 Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 1,418.655 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692 11 0 0 1 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4091 1.4091 2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3329 1.3329 3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1499 1.1499 4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1457 1.1457 5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1415 1.1415 6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0278 1.0278 7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.9868 0.9868 8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.9831 0.9831 City Council 18 - 158 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.9798 0.9798 10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8757 2.8757 11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6188 1.6188 Highest 2.8757 2.8757 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 i 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 i 220.9670 i 0.0201 i 3.7400e- 1 222.5835 i i Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 i 0.7770 7.6200e- i i 0.0966 i 0.0966 i i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1 3,896.073 i 3,896.073 i 0.1303 1 0.0468 1 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 3 ;� 1 i i i 1 Mobile •1 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 1 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 1 0.0000 1 7,629.016 '1 6 i 6 i i 1 2 ;1 1 Waste •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 1 0.0000 1 514.8354 ;1 1 ------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ----------------------*------r------ ---------------j-------*------- Water •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 � 29.1632 i 556.6420 � 585.8052 i 3.0183 � 0.0755 1 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 12,531.15 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47 j j j j 07 19 j 51 City Council 18 - 159 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 10.3804 i 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 � i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 i Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 0.7770 i 7.6200e- 0.0966 i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 i 3,896.073 3,896.073 i 0.1303 0.0468 13,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i i 3 Mobile •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 17,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2 Waste •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 1514.8354 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 29.1632 i 556.6420 585.8052 i 3.0183 0.0755 1683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 12,531.15 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47 07 19 51 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase City Council 18 - 160 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition +Demolition 19/1/2021 110/12/2021 5: 30: + i 2 :Site Preparation +Site Preparation 110/13/2021 :11/9/2021 5: 20: + i 3 •Grading +Grading 111/10/2021 :1/11/2022 5: 45: + i 4 -Building Construction +Building Construction 11/12/2022 :12/12/2023 5: 500: + i 5 -Paving +Paving 112/13/2023 :1/30/2024 5: 35: + i 6 -Architectural Coating -Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5. 35, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment City Council 18 — 161 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders 1 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT City Council 18 — 162 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00" , 0.001 458.00; 10.00: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix IHDT_Mix (HHDT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • Site Preparation - - - - - - - - - - - - - �_ 7; ________ __'------ -- 18.00: I - - 0.001 - - - - - - i 0.001 - - - - - - - - - ' - - 10.00: - - - - - - - - - - 6.90; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20.00;LD_Mix - - - - - - - - - ;HDT_Mix - T - - - - - - - - - ;HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 10.00: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix *- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 10.00: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- T ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 10.00: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f ; Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 10.00, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i , , , , 0.0496 , 0.0000 , 0.0496 , 7.5100e- , 0.0000 ; 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0475 , 0.4716 , 0.3235 , 5.8000e- , , 0.0233 , 0.0233 , , 0.0216 ; 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0012 , 51.0012 , 0.0144 , 0.0000 1 51.3601 004 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 004 003 City Council 18 - 163 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 11 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 1.9300e- i 0.0634 i 0.0148 1.8000e- i 3.9400e- 1.9000e- 4.1300e- i 1.0800e- 1.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 i 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- i 0.0000 i 17.4869 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 7.2000e- 5.3000e- 6.0900e- 2.000Oe- 1.6800e- 1.000Oe- 1.6900e- 4.5000e- 1.000Oe- 4.6000e- 0.0000 i 1.5281 1.5281 5.000Oe- 0.0000 I 1.5293 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i I I 005 I Total 2.6500e- 0.0639 0.0209 2.000Oe- 5.6200e- 2.000Oe- 5.8200e- 1.5300e- 1.9000e- 1.7200e- 0.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e- 0.0000 19.0161 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 i 7.5100e- 0.0000 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003 Off -Road •i 0.0475 i 0.4716 i 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 i 0.0000 i 51.3600 004 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 004 003 1 j City Council 18 - 164 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 12 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Hauling •I 1.9300e- I 0.0634 I 0.0148 11.8000e- 13.9400e- I 1.9000e- 14.1300e- I 1.0800e- 11.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 I 17.4566 I 17.4566 11.2100e- I 0.0000 i 17.4869 �I 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 004 I 003 I 003 I 004 003003 I I- I I I I I I I I I I I Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I- I I I Worker •I 7.2000e- 1.6800e- 1.00OOe- 4.6000e- � 0.0000 I 1.5281 1.5281 0.0000 I 1.5293 15.3000e- 16.0900e- 12.00OOe- I I 11.6900e- 14.5000e- 11.00OOe- I 15.00OOe- I 'I 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 I I 005 I Total 2.6500e- 0.0639 0.0209 2.00OOe- 5.6200e- 2.00OOe- 5.8200e- 1.5300e- 1.9000e- 1.7200e- 0.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e- 0.0000 19.0161 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7061 004 I I I I 1 I I I I Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e- 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 004 City Council 18 - 165 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 13 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I Hauling •I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I- I I I I I I I I I I I Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •I 5.8000e- 1.3400e- 1.000Oe- 3.7000e- 0.0000 I 1.2225 1.2225 0.0000 I 1.2234 14.3000e- 14.8700e- 11.000Oe- I I 11.3500e- 13.6000e- 11.000Oe- I 14.000Oe- I 'I 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 I I 005 I Total 5.8000e- 4.3000e- 4.8700e- 1.000Oe- 1.3400e- 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 3.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.7000e- 0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2234 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7060 004 I I I I 1 I I I I Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e- 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 004 City Council 18 - 166 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 14 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 -------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 5.8000e- 4.3000e- 4.8700e- 1.00OOe- 1.3400e- 1.00OOe- 1.3500e- 3.6000e- 1.00OOe- 3.7000e- 0.0000 i 1.2225 1.2225 4.00OOe- 0.0000 I 1.2234 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 I I 005 I Total 5.8000e- 4.3000e- 4.8700e- 1.00OOe- 1.3400e- 1.00OOe- 1.3500e- 3.6000e- 1.00OOe- 3.7000e- 0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.00OOe- 0.0000 1.2234 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3776 003 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 003 City Council 18 - 167 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 15 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 -------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+-------------'---------------------- Worker •i 1.2200e- 9.000Oe- 0.0103 3.000Oe- 2.8300e- 2.000Oe- 2.8600e- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- 0.0000 i 2.5808 2.5808 8.000Oe- 0.0000 I 2.5828 i i i i i 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 1.2200e- 9.000Oe- 0.0103 3.000Oe- 2.8300e- 2.000Oe- 2.8600e- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- 0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0007 0.0000 2.5828 11 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.1741 i 0.0000 i 0.1741 i 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5403 1 103.5403 1 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3775 003 i i i i i • i i i i Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 003 City Council 18 - 168 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 16 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 1.2200e- 9.000Oe- 0.0103 3.000Oe- 2.8300e- 2.000Oe- 2.8600e- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- 0.0000 i 2.5808 2.5808 8.000Oe- 0.0000 I 2.5828 i i i i i 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 1.2200e- 9.000Oe- 0.0103 3.000Oe- 2.8300e- 2.000Oe- 2.8600e- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- 0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.000Oe- 0.0000 2.5828 7-t-I 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 i 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 0.0807 5.7200e- 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 19.2414 004 003 003 003 City Council 18 - 169 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 17 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 2.1000e- i 1.5000e- i 1.7400e- 1.000Oe- i 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.3000e- i 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.4587 0.4587 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 I 0.4590 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Total 2.1000e- 1.5000e- 1.7400e- 1.0000e- 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.3000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- 0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4590 11 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 i 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 0.0807 5.7200e- 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 19.2414 004 003 003 003 City Council 18 - 170 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 2.1000e- i 1.5000e- i 1.7400e- 1.00OOe- i 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.3000e- i 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.4587 0.4587 1.00OOe- i 0.0000 I 0.4590 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Total 2.1000e- 1.5000e- 1.7400e- 1.00OOe- 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.3000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- 0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4590 11 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 2.0700 i 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 i i 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 i 0.0000 1294.8881 003 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 003 City Council 18 - 171 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------- Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 1442.6435 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.3051 i 0.2164 i 2.5233 7.3500e- i 0.7557 6.2300e- 0.7619 i 0.2007 5.7400e- 0.2065 0.0000 i 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 i 0.0000 1664.4604 003 003 003 i Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e- 0.8790 0.2336 8.7800e- 0.2424 0.0000 1,105.977 1,105.977 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103 003 003 1 1 9 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 i 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 i 0.0000 1294.8877 003 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 003 City Council 18 - 172 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------- Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 1442.6435 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.3051 i 0.2164 i 2.5233 7.3500e- i 0.7557 6.2300e- 0.7619 i 0.2007 5.7400e- 0.2065 0.0000 i 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 i 0.0000 1664.4604 003 003 003 i Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e- 0.8790 0.2336 8.7800e- 0.2424 0.0000 1,105.977 1,105.977 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103 003 003 1 1 9 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 1286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 i 0.0000 1287.9814 003j Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 003 j City Council 18 - 173 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 1418.5624 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.2795 i 0.1910 i 2.2635 6.9100e- i 0.7377 5.9100e- 0.7436 i 0.1960 5.4500e- 0.2014 0.0000 i 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 i 0.0000 1624.9466 003 003 003 i Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e- 0.8564 0.2281 6.8500e- 0.2349 0.0000 1,042.529 1,042.529 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509 003 003 4 4 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 1286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 i 0.0000 1287.9811 i i i i i • i i i i 003j Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 003 j City Council 18 - 174 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 22 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 1418.5624 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.2795 i 0.1910 i 2.2635 6.9100e- i 0.7377 5.9100e- 0.7436 i 0.1960 5.4500e- 0.2014 0.0000 i 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 i 0.0000 1624.9466 003 003 003 i Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e- 0.8564 0.2281 6.8500e- 0.2349 0.0000 1,042.529 1,042.529 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509 003 003 4 4 0 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 m City Council 18 - 175 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 23 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ------------------------ ---------------------'----------------------- -+ - -------------'--.--�-------T Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 '� I '� • I • Worker •i 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.2300e- 1.000Oe- 7.3000e- 1.000Oe- 7.3000e- 1.9000e- 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6156 0.6156 2.000Oe- 0.0000 I 0.6160 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 I I 005 I Total 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.2300e- 1.000Oe- 7.3000e- 1.000Oe- 7.3000e- 1.9000e- 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.6160 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 13.1227 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 1 City Council 18 - 176 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 24 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I Worker •i 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.2300e- 1.00OOe- 7.3000e- 1.00OOe- 7.3000e- 1.9000e- 1.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.6156 0.6156 2.00OOe- 0.0000 I 0.6160 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 I I 005 I Total 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.2300e- 1.00OOe- 7.3000e- 1.00OOe- 7.3000e- 1.9000e- 1.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6160 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0109 i 0.1048 0.1609 i 2.5000e- i i 5.1500e- i 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- i 0.0000 i 22.2073 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 22.2073 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 City Council 18 - 177 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 25 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 4.4000e- 2.9000e- 3.5100e- 1.000Oe- 1.2300e- 1.000Oe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.000Oe- 3.4000e- 0.0000 i 1.0094 1.0094 3.000Oe- 0.0000 I 1.0100 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 I I 005 I Total 4.4000e- 2.9000e- 3.5100e- 1.0000e- 1.2300e- 1.000Oe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.000Oe- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0100 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 i 22.2073 i i i •� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 m City Council 18 - 178 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 26 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 -------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+-------------'---------------------- Worker •i 4.4000e- 2.9000e- 3.5100e- 1.00OOe- 1.2300e- 1.00OOe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.00OOe- 3.4000e- 0.0000 i 1.0094 1.0094 3.00OOe- 0.0000 I 1.0100 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 I I 005 I Total 4.4000e- 2.9000e- 3.5100e- 1.00OOe- 1.2300e- 1.00OOe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.00OOe- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.00O7 0.0000 1.0100 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 4.4745 005 003 003 003 003 004 City Council 18 - 179 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 27 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 7.4800e- 4.9300e- 0.0596 1.9000e- 0.0209 1.6000e- 0.0211 5.5500e- 1.5000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 i 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 0.0000 I 17.1394 i i i i i 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total 7.4800e- 4.9300e- 0.0596 1.9000e- 0.0209 1.6000e- 0.0211 5.5500e- 1.5000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 0.0000 17.1394 11 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 4.4745 005 003 003 003 003 004 City Council 18 - 180 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Worker •i 7.4800e- 4.9300e- 0.0596 1.9000e- 0.0209 1.6000e- 0.0211 5.5500e- 1.5000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 i 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 0.0000 I 17.1394 i i i i i 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total 7.4800e- 4.9300e- 0.0596 1.9000e- 0.0209 1.6000e- 0.0211 5.5500e- 1.5000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 0.0000 17.1394 11 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile City Council 18 - 181 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 i 7.7979 i 0.0580 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 � 7,620.498 � 0.3407 i 0.0000 i 7,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 • 7,620.498 • 0.3407 - 0.0000 • 7,629.016 6 6 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ......................................----------- ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information City Council 18 - 182 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy City Council 18 - 183 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity •1 I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 I I 1 2,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037 I 1 0.0215 i 2,521.635 Mitigated 5 I 5 1 I 1 6 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 Electricity •1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 0.0000 1 I 1 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 2,512.646 1 1 2,512.646 I I 0.1037 I 1 0.0215 2,521.635 Unmitigated ;i I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 . I 5 1 5 1 I 1 6 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 11,383.426 I 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 Miti 003 7 I 7 1 8gated • I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- - 0.0966 0.0966 - 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 - 1,383.426 - 0.0265 - 0.0254 1,391.647 Unmitigated 003 7 7 8 City Council 18 - 184 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise 1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 ; 1 1 r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T Apartments Mid i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise +007 ; 1 I I 003 _ 1 ; 1 r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T General Office Building i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . I 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1 '1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit 8.30736e •1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant) 1 +006 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . I 1 1 003 1 003 1 ----------- Hotel ------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�-------�-------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1.74095e 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . I 1 1 003 1 003 1 __ " '-" "I Quality 1 j-------i------- i ------- i------- i-------- ------- i------- i---------------. 1 -------------- -------' r------71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 1 99.0993 Restaurant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_ Regional Shopping Centers I 91840 .1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . I 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 003 8 8 8 City Council 18 - 185 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise 1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 004 1 004 1 1 ; 1 r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T Apartments Mid i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise +007 ; 1 I I 003 _ 1 ; 1 r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T General Office Building i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . I 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1 '1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit 8.30736e .1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant) 1 +006 i 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . I 1 1 003 1 003 1 ----------- Hotel ------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�------- -------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , �____--'I-------1 1 1 ------- 1.74095e •1 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . I 1 1 003 1 003 1 -""'-""i Quality '1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------��1 �-------�-------�-------1 r-------------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ____--'I-------1 1 1 T_----- 71 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 99.0993 Restaurant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_ Regional Shopping Centers I 91840 •1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 ; 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . I 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 003 8 8 j j 8 City Council 18 - 186 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978 Rise 003 004 i Apartments Mid • ---------------- 13.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086 Rise +006 9 I i I 9 General Office -j--------j------- I 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 1186.9165 Building 003 003 High Turnover (Sit -j- - - - - --- - - - - - - 1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135 Down Restaurant) i +006 003 ---r--- Hotel ------- *------- ---ii•--------------- I 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 1175.9672 003 003 --- Quality •�- - - - - --- r------ii------- *------- 353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141 Restaurant ;1 I 003 i 004 Regional 756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- T 241.7395 Shopping Center 003 i 003 Total 2,512.646 0.1037 0.0215 2:521.635 5 6 City Council 18 - 187 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978 Rise 003 004 Apartments Mid • ---------------- 13.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086 Rise +006 9 I i I 9 General Office -j--------j------- I 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 186.9165 Building 003 003 High Turnover (Sit -j- - - - - --- - - - - - - 1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135 Down Restaurant) i +006 003 ---r--- Hotel ------- *------- ---ii•--------------- I 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 1175.9672 003 003 --- Quality •�- - - - - --- r------ii------- *------- 353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141 Restaurant ;1 003 i 004 Regional -------------- 756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- 241.7395 Shopping Center 003 i 003 Total 2,512.646�71037 0.0215 2,521.635 5 6 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area City Council 18 - 188 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 � 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 � 3.7400e- 1222.5835 003 003 Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e- - 0.0714 - 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 - 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.4137 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 Coating -----------:'---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------*------- Consumer �I 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- i 0.0143 i 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- 1205.3295 •� 003 003 003 i . Landscaping •i 0.3096 I 0.1187 10.3054 15.4000e- I 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 I 17.2540 i 004 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e- 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 City Council 18 - 189 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.4137 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- 1205.3295 003 003 003 i Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 i 0.0161 0.0000 I 17.2540 004 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e- 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 11 003 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water City Council 18 - 190 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 585.8052 I 3.0183 i 0.0755 1683.7567 - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4------------------------------- - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 City Council 18 — 191 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low 1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471 Rise 1.02688 ;1 1 003 '-------- -------- ------- Apartments Mid 1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363 Rise 40.0485 -- - - - --- - - - - - - General Office 1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- 1 61.6019 Building 4.90201 ;1 i i 003 --r- 1 1 ----- ------- -j--------------- * - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit 10.9272 / •i 51.2702 1 0.3580 1 8.8200e- 62.8482 Down Restaurant) i 0.697482 ;1 i i 003 ' -------- ------- Hotel 1 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 1 0.0416 1 1.0300e- 1 7.5079 1 0.140927 '1 i i 003 1 -- - - - - --- - - - - - - Quality 2.42827 / •i 11.3934 1 0.0796 1 1.9600e- 13.9663 Restaurant i 0.154996 ;1 i i 003 ---------- --------------- Regional 4.14806 / •i 27.5250 1 0.1363 1 3.4200e- 31.9490 Shopping Center 2.54236 ;1 i i 003 Total 585.8052 j 3.0183 j 0.0755 683.7567 City Council 18 - 192 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low 1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471 Rise 1.02688 ;1 1 003 '-------- -------- ------- Apartments Mid 1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363 Rise 40.0485 -- - - - --- - - - - - - General Office 1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- 1 61.6019 Building 4.90201 ;1 i i 003 --r- 1 1 ----- ------- -j--------------- * - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit 10.9272 / •i 51.2702 1 0.3580 1 8.8200e- 62.8482 Down Restaurant) i 0.697482 ;1 i i 003 ' -------- ------- Hotel 1 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 1 0.0416 1 1.0300e- 1 7.5079 1 0.140927 '1 i i 003 1 -- - - - - --- - - - - - - Quality 2.42827 / •i 11.3934 1 0.0796 1 1.9600e- 13.9663 Restaurant i 0.154996 ;1 i i 003 ---------- --------------- Regional 4.14806 / •i 27.5250 1 0.1363 1 3.4200e- 31.9490 Shopping Center 2.54236 ;1 i i 003 Total 585.8052 j 3.0183 j 0.0755 683.7567 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste City Council 18 - 193 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual CategoryNear Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 207.8079 1 12.2811 1 0.0000 1 514.8354 - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------+------------------------------ - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 City Council 18 — 194 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low 11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834 Rise •� i • '-------'------- Apartments Mid I 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513 Rise •� -------- i -------- ------- '------- GeneralOffice I 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464 Building i •� --r ------ �i------- '------- '------- *------- High Turnover (Sit 428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430 Down Restaurant) •� i • '-------'------- Hotel I 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694 __ i i Quality 7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712 Restaurant i •� • -------- ------- 58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706 Shopping Center i •� Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 City Council 18 - 195 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low 11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834 Rise •� i • '-------'------- Apartments Mid I 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513 Rise •� -------- i -------- ------- '------- GeneralOffice I 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 I 21.0464 Building i •� --r ------ �i------- '------- '------- *------- High Turnover (Sit 428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430 Down Restaurant) •� i '-------'------- Hotel I 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694 __ i i Quality 7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712 Restaurant i •� • - ' - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - Regional 58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706 Shopping Center i •� Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type City Council 18 - 196 10/3/2023 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation City Council 18 — 197 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 I 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 High ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 + -----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 ------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 _ --- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + ----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 ---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments artments Mid Rise 975.00 + ----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 I 2789 ------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data City Council 18 — 198 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces -----t-----------------------------t FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ t-----------------------------t-------------------------- NumberWood 1.25 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------t------------------------- NumberWood r 48.75 0.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ t----------------------------- t-------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- ST_TR 158.37 79.82 City Council 18 — 199 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- ST_TR ---------------------------------T-------------------------- } 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 49.97 10.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 6.07 6.16 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.86 4.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.95 3.20 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary City Council 18 - 200 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 i 6,163.416 6,163.416 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103 i i � i i i 6 i 6 i i i 9 2022 •i 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 i 12,493.44 12,493.44 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57 i i i i i 03 03 07 2023 •i 4.1534 i 25.7658 38.7457 i 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 i 7.7679 1.8799 i 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 i 12,150.48 12,150.48 i 0.9589 0.0000 112,174.46 2024 •1 237.0219 i 9.5478 14.9642 i 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 i 1.2875 0.3229 i 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 i 2,313.180 2,313.180 i 0.7166 0.0000 12,331.095 8 i 8 i i i 6 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 12,493.44 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57 11 03 03 07 City Council 18 - 201 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 i 6,163.416 6,163.416 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103 i i � i i i 6 i 6 i i i 9 2022 •i 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 i 12,493.44 12,493.44 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57 i i i i i 03 03 07 2023 •i 4.1534 i 25.7658 38.7457 i 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 i 7.7679 1.8799 i 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 i 12,150.48 12,150.48 i 0.9589 0.0000 112,174.46 2024 •1 237.0219 i 9.5478 14.9642 i 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 i 1.2875 0.3229 i 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 i 2,313.180 2,313.180 i 0.7166 0.0000 12,331.095 8 i 8 i i i 5 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 12,493.44 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57 03 03 07 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction City Council 18 - 202 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Page 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 1 0.3300 18,259.11 i i � � i � i i '� 50 50 1 i 92 I • --------------- Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 18,405.638 2 i 2 i i i 7 Mobile •1 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 i 46.2951 12.2950 i 0.3119 12.6070 i 50,306.60 50,306.60 i 2.1807 50,361.12 08 34 i 34 � I I Total 41.1168 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 76,811.18 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87 11 762 16 16 86 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 88.4430 i 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 i 0.4874 0.3300 118,259.11 �� ■ 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 18,405.638 '� i i i i i i i i i i i ■ 2 2 i 7 Mobile 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 i 46.2951 12.2950 i 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 i 2.1807 150,361.12 150,306.60 ■ 34 34 i 08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 76,811.18 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87 16 16 86 City Council 18 - 203 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition !9/1/2021 110/12/2021 51 30: i i _ 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation ! 10/13/2021 111/9/2021 1 51 20: i i _ 3 •Grading +Grading !11/10/2021 11/11/2022 1 51 45: i i _ 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction ! 1/12/2022 :12/12/2023 1 51 500: i i _ 5 :Paving +Paving ! 12/13/2023 11/30/2024 1 51 35: + I 1 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -1/31/2024 -3/19/2024 5, 35- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment City Council 18 — 204 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders 1 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT City Council 18 — 205 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00" , 0.001 458.00; 10.00: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix IHDT_Mix (HHDT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • Site Preparation - - - - - - - - - - - - - �_ 7; ________ __'------ -- 18.00: I - - 0.001 - - - - - - i 0.001 - - - - - - - - - ' - - 10.00: - - - - - - - - - - 6.90; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20.00;LD_Mix - - - - - - - - - ;HDT_Mix - T - - - - - - - - - ;HHDT --------------- ° �- Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 10.00: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix *- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 10.00: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 10.00: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 10.00, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 3.3074 , 0.0000 , 3.3074 , 0.5008 , 0.0000 ; 0.5008 � 1 , 0.0000 , , 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 , 31.4407 , 21.5650 , 0.0388 , , 1.5513 , 1.5513 , , 1.4411 ; 1.4411 i 3,747.944 , 3,747.944 , 1.0549 , 1 3,774.317 9 i 9 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3:774.317 9 9 4 City Council 18 - 206 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 i 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 i 1,294.433 i i � i i • � � i '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 7 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0487 i 0.0313 i 0.4282 1.1800e- i 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 i 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e- i 1117.3678 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.0912 1,411.801 f-77771,409.521 2 17,409.5211 2 1 5 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 i 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 i 31.4407 i 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 i 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 i i 3,774.317 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 9 9 4 City Council 18 - 207 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 i 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 i 1,294.433 i i � i i • � � i '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 7 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0487 i 0.0313 i 0.4282 1.1800e- i 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 i 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e- i 1117.3678 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.0912 1,411.801 f-7771,409.521 2 17,409.5211 2 1 5 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 � 0.0380 i � 2.0445 � 2.0445 i � 1.8809 � 1.8809 � i 3,685.656 � 3,685.656 � 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i • g i 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 City Council 18 - 208 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0584 i 0.0375 i 0.5139 1.4100e- i 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 i 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- i 1140.8414 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 140.8414 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 i g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 City Council 18 - 209 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0584 i 0.0375 i 0.5139 1.4100e- i 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 i 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 i 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- i 1140.8414 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 140.8414 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 � 0.0620 i � 1.9853 � 1.9853 i � 1.8265 � 1.8265 � i 6,007.043 � 6,007.043 � 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 777 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 City Council 18 - 210 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0649 i 0.0417 i 0.5710 1.5700e- i 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- i 1156.4904 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 156.4904 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 i 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 City Council 18 - 211 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0649 i 0.0417 i 0.5710 1.5700e- i 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- i 1156.4904 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 156.4904 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 � 0.0621 i � 1.6349 � 1.6349 i � 1.5041 1.5041 � i 6,011.410 � 6,011.410 � 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i i i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 City Council 18 - 212 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0607 i 0.0376 i 0.5263 1.5100e- i 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- i 1150.9813 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 150.9813 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 City Council 18 - 213 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0607 i 0.0376 i 0.5263 1.5100e- i 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- i 1150.9813 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 150.9813 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 i 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 City Council 18 - 214 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.4079 i 13.2032 i 3.4341 0.0364 i 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 i 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 i 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 i 13,902.138 2 i 2 i i i 4 Worker •i 2.4299 i 1.5074 i 21.0801 0.0607 i 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 i 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 6,042.558 6,042.558 0.1697 i 16,046.800 5 i 5 i i 1 0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 9,939.106 0.3933 9,948.938 [7779,939.106 7 7 4 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 City Council 18 - 215 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.4079 i 13.2032 i 3.4341 0.0364 i 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 i 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 i 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 i 13,902.138 2 i 2 i i i 4 Worker •i 2.4299 i 1.5074 i 21.0801 0.0607 i 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 i 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 6,042.558 6,042.558 0.1697 i 16,046.800 5 i 5 i i 1 0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 9,939.106 0.3933 9,948.938 [7779,939.106 7 7 4 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 12,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 i i i i i i i i 9 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.658T 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 j j j j j j 9 9 1 City Council 18 - 216 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3027 i 10.0181 i 3.1014 0.0352 i 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 i 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 i 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 i 13,778.830 2 i 2 i i i 0 Worker •i 2.2780 i 1.3628 i 19.4002 0.0584 i 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 i 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 i 5,821.402 5,821.402 0.1529 i 15,825.225 8 i 8 i i i 4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 9,595.279 0.3511 9,604.055 0 0 4 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 9 i 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 11 9 9 1 City Council 18 - 217 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3027 i 10.0181 i 3.1014 0.0352 i 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 i 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 i 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 i 13,778.830 2 i 2 i i i 0 Worker •i 2.2780 i 1.3628 i 19.4002 0.0584 i 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 i 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 i 5,821.402 5,821.402 0.1529 i 15,825.225 8 i 8 i i i 4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 9,595.279 0.3511 9,604.055 0 0 4 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 City Council 18 - 218 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0255 i 0.3633 1.0900e- i 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- i 1109.0866 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e- 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 109.0866 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 City Council 18 - 219 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0255 i 0.3633 1.0900e- i 0.1141 9.00OOe- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- i 1109.0866 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e- 0.1141 9.00OOe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 109.0866 003 004 004 003 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 City Council 18 - 220 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0403 i 0.0233 i 0.3384 1.0600e- i 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- i 1105.6992 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 105.6992 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 i 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 City Council 18 - 221 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0403 i 0.0233 i 0.3384 1.0600e- i 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- i 1105.6992 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 105.6992 003 004 004 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •i 236.4115 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 i 2.9700e- i i 0.0609 i 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 City Council 18 - 222 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.4296 i 0.2481 i 3.6098 0.0113 i 1.2171 � 9.4300e- 1.2266 i 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 i 11,127.458 003 003 3 3 i 3 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 1,127.458 =.t.l 003 003 3 3 3 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •1 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 City Council 18 - 223 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.4296 i 0.2481 i 3.6098 0.0113 i 1.2171 � 9.4300e- 1.2266 i 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 i 11,127.458 003 003 3 3 i 3 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 1,127.458 =.t.' 003 003 3 3 3 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile City Council 18 - 224 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 i 45.9592 i 0.3360 46.2951 i 12.2950 � 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 50,306.60 2.1807 i i 50,361.12 •� . 34 34 i 08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 • 50,306.60 • 2.1807 - 50,361.12 34 34 08 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ......................................----------- ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information City Council 18 - 225 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy City Council 18 - 226 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 i 4.2573 0.0418 i i 0.5292 0.5292 i i 0.5292 0.5292 + i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 i 0.1532 1 8,405.638 Mitigated ;i . I 2 2 i 7 NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 • 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 • 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2 7 City Council 18 — 227 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low 1 1119.16 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- 1 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 1 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1------------------------------------------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------ � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1283.42 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- 1 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 •1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 1 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r-------1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel 1 4769.72 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 1 564.4782 1 1 1 1 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 Quality 1 5057.75 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � v 1 1 1 1 T""--- 251.616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 City Council 18 - 228 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low 1 1.11916 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- 1 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid i 35.7843 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 1 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1 1------- ----------------------------- -------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------71_----__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1.28342 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- 1 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22.7599 .1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 1 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r------�1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4.76972 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 1 564.4782 1 1 I I 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 -r------71 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 ------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �-------I-------1 1 1 T'------ Quality 5.05775 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T""--- 0.251616 •1 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 077 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area City Council 18 - 229 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 � 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 i i 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 118,259.11 50 50 92 -------------i I Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 • 18,148.59 - 0.4874 • 0.3300 • 18,259.11 50 50 92 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating•' ' i i- -----------:'---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------*------- Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products •' . ' i Hearth •i 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 i i i i i i i 118,106.96 Landscaping •i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 1152.1542 003 i i i i i i i i i • Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 City Council 18 - 230 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 1.6500 i 14.1000 6.0000 i 0.0900 1.1400 i 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 i 18,000.00 18,000.00 i 0.3450 1 0.3300 118,106.96 ---- -- - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --- - -- ------------------------------ Landscaping i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 152.1542 003 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 j j F-777000 50 50 j 92 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment City Council 18 - 231 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation City Council 18 — 232 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 I 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 High ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 + -----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 ------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 _ --- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + ----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 ---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments artments Mid Rise 975.00 + ----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 I 2789 ------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data City Council 18 — 233 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces -----t-----------------------------t FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ t-----------------------------t-------------------------- NumberWood 1.25 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------t------------------------- NumberWood r 48.75 0.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ t----------------------------- t-------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- ST_TR 158.37 79.82 City Council 18 — 234 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- ST_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 49.97 10.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 6.07 6.16 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.86 4.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.95 3.20 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary City Council 18 - 235 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2621 i 46.4460 31.4068 i 0.0635 18.2032 � 2.0456 i 20.2488 9.9670 i 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 i 6,154.337 6,154.337 i 1.9472 � 0.0000 6,203.018 7 i 7 i i i 6 ------------- 2022 •i 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 i 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60 i � i � � i � i � � i 40 40 i 13 2023 •i 4.3939 i 25.8648 37.5031 i 0.1162 � 7.0088 0.7598 i 7.7685 1.8799 i 0.7142 2.5940 0.0000 i 11,710.40 11,710.40 i 0.9617 0.0000 111,734.44 2024 •i 237.0656 i 9.5503 14.9372 i 0.0238 1.2171 � 0.4694 i 1.2875 0.3229 i 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 i 2,307.051 2,307.051 i 0.7164 0.0000 12,324.962 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 7 Maximum 237.0656 46.4460 39.6338 0.1195 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60 11 40 40 13 City Council 18 - 236 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2621 i 46.4460 31.4068 i 0.0635 18.2032 � 2.0456 i 20.2488 9.9670 i 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 i 6,154.337 6,154.337 i 1.9472 � 0.0000 6,203.018 7 i 7 i i i 6 ------------- 2022 •i 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 i 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60 i � i � � i � i � � i 40 40 i 13 2023 •i 4.3939 i 25.8648 37.5031 i 0.1162 � 7.0088 0.7598 i 7.7685 1.8799 i 0.7142 2.5940 0.0000 i 11,710.40 11,710.40 i 0.9617 0.0000 111,734.44 2024 •i 237.0656 i 9.5503 14.9372 i 0.0238 1.2171 � 0.4694 i 1.2875 0.3229 i 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 i 2,307.051 2,307.051 i 0.7164 0.0000 12,324.962 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 7 Maximum 237.0656 46.4460 39.6338 0.1195 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60 11 40 40 13 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction City Council 18 - 237 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Page 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 1 0.3300 18,259.11 i i � � i � i i 50 50 1 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 18,405.638 2 i 2 i i i 7 Mobile •i 9.5233 i 45.9914 � 110.0422 i 0.4681 � 45.9592 � 0.3373 i 46.2965 � 12.2950 i 0.3132 12.6083 i 47,917.80 � 47,917.80 i 2.1953 � 147,972.68 '� 05 05 i 39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 74,422.37 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44 87 87 17 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 88.4430 i 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 i 0.4874 0.3300 118,259.11 �� ■ 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 1 0.1532 18,405.638 '� i i i i i i i i i i i ■ 2 2 i 7 Mobile 9.5233 i 45.9914 110.0422 i 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 i 46.2965 12.2950 i 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 i 2.1953 47,972.68 147,917.80 ■ 05 05 i 39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 74,422.37 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44 87 87 17 City Council 18 - 238 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition !9/1/2021 110/12/2021 51 30: i i _ 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation ! 10/13/2021 111/9/2021 1 51 20: i i _ 3 •Grading +Grading !11/10/2021 11/11/2022 1 51 45: i i _ 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction ! 1/12/2022 :12/12/2023 1 51 500: i i _ 5 :Paving +Paving ! 12/13/2023 11/30/2024 1 51 35: + I 1 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -1/31/2024 -3/19/2024 5, 35- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment City Council 18 — 239 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders 1 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT City Council 18 — 240 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 458.00; 10.00: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix EHHDT - - - - - - - - - - - - - Site Preparation 7; --------- I, 18.00: - - 0.001 - - - - - - i 0.001 - - - - - - - - - - - 10.00: - - - - - - - - - - 6.90; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20.00;LD_Mix --------------------- ;HDT_Mix (HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 10.00: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix *- EHHDT I- ----------------A-------------- Building Construction v 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 10.00: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- T ;HHDT A----------- �- Paving 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i4------------- 0.001 ,----------- 0.00: 10.00: 6.90; -----------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 10.00, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 3.3074 , 0.0000 , 3.3074 , 0.5008 , 0.0000 ; 0.5008 � 1 , 0.0000 , , 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 , 31.4407 , 21.5650 , 0.0388 , , 1.5513 , 1.5513 , , 1.4411 ; 1.4411 i 3,747.944 , 3,747.944 , 1.0549 , 1 3,774.317 9 i 9 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3:774.317 9 9 4 City Council 18 - 241 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 i 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 1 1,272.125 i i � i � i • i '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 2 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0532 i 0.0346 i 0.3963 1.1100e- i 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 i 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 i 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e- i 1 110.5539 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.1835 4.1800 1.4144 0.0128 0.3810 0.0137 0.3948 0.1034 0.0131 0.0941 1,382.679 f-77771,380.326 2 17,380.326 2 1 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 i 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 i 31.4407 i 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 i 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 i 1 3,774.317 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 9 9 i 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 9 9 4 City Council 18 - 242 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 i 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 1 1,272.125 i i � i � i • i '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 2 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0532 i 0.0346 i 0.3963 1.1100e- i 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 i 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 i 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e- i 1 110.5539 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.1835 4.1800 1.4144 0.0128 0.3810 0.0137 0.3948 0.1034 0.0131 0.0941 1,382.679 f-77771,380.326 2 17,380.326 2 1 1 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 � 0.0380 i � 2.0445 � 2.0445 i � 1.8809 � 1.8809 � i 3,685.656 � 3,685.656 � 1.1920 i 1 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i i • g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 City Council 18 - 243 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0638 i 0.0415 i 0.4755 1.3300e- i 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 i 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- i 1132.6646 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 132.6646 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 i 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i i • 9 9 i 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 City Council 18 - 244 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0638 i 0.0415 i 0.4755 1.3300e- i 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 i 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- i 1132.6646 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 132.6646 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 � 0.0620 i � 1.9853 � 1.9853 i � 1.8265 � 1.8265 � i 6,007.043 � 6,007.043 � 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 777 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 City Council 18 - 245 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0709 i 0.0462 i 0.5284 1.4800e- i 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- i 1147.4051 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 147.4051 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 i 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 City Council 18 - 246 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0709 i 0.0462 i 0.5284 1.4800e- i 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- i 1147.4051 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 147.4051 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 � 0.0621 i � 1.6349 � 1.6349 i � 1.5041 1.5041 � i 6,011.410 � 6,011.410 � 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i i i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 City Council 18 - 247 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0665 i 0.0416 i 0.4861 1.4300e- i 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.000Oe- i 1142.2207 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.000Oe- 142.2207 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i i i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 City Council 18 - 248 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0665 i 0.0416 i 0.4861 1.4300e- i 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.00OOe- i 1142.2207 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.00OOe- 142.2207 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 i 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 City Council 18 - 249 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.4284 i 13.1673 i 3.8005 � 0.0354 i 0.9155 � 0.0256 0.9412 i 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 i 13,795.028 0 i 0 i i i 3 Worker •i 2.6620 i 1.6677 i 19.4699 0.0571 i 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 i 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 5,691.935 5,691.935 0.1602 i 15,695.940 4 i 4 i i i 8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 9,481.010 0.3984 9,490.969 4 4 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 City Council 18 - 250 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.4284 i 13.1673 i 3.8005 � 0.0354 i 0.9155 � 0.0256 0.9412 i 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 i 13,795.028 0 i 0 i i i 3 Worker •i 2.6620 i 1.6677 i 19.4699 0.0571 i 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 i 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 5,691.935 5,691.935 0.1602 i 15,695.940 4 i 4 i i i 8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 9,481.010 0.3984 9,490.969 4 4 1 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 12,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 i i i i i i i i 9 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.658T 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 j j j j j j 9 9 1 City Council 18 - 251 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3183 i 9.9726 i 3.3771 0.0343 i 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 i 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 i 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 i 13,676.641 7 i 7 i i i 7 Worker •i 2.5029 i 1.5073 i 17.8820 0.0550 i 6.0932 0.0479 � 6.1411 i 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 5,483.797 0.1442 i 15,487.402 4 i 4 i i i 0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 777 9,155.198 9,155.198 0.3538 9,164.043 1 1 7 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 9 i 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 11 9 9 1 City Council 18 - 252 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3183 i 9.9726 i 3.3771 0.0343 i 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 i 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 i 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 i 13,676.641 7 i 7 i i i 7 Worker •i 2.5029 i 1.5073 i 17.8820 0.0550 i 6.0932 0.0479 � 6.1411 i 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 5,483.797 0.1442 i 15,487.402 4 i 4 i i i 0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 777 9,155.198 9,155.198 0.3538 9,164.043 1 1 7 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 City Council 18 - 253 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0469 i 0.0282 i 0.3349 1.0300e- i 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- i 1102.7603 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e- 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 102.7603 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 City Council 18 - 254 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0469 i 0.0282 i 0.3349 1.0300e- i 0.1141 9.00OOe- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- i 1102.7603 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e- 0.1141 9.00OOe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 102.7603 003 004 004 003 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 City Council 18 - 255 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.000Oe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- I 99.5663 i i i i i 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.000Oe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 99.5663 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 i 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 City Council 18 - 256 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.00OOe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- I 99.5663 i i i i i 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.00OOe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 99.5663 003 004 004 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •i 236.4115 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 i 2.9700e- i i 0.0609 i 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 11 003 City Council 18 - 257 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 ---------------------------------------------'----------------------- --+ ------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.4734 i 0.2743 i 3.3220 0.0107 i 1.2171 � 9.4300e- 1.2266 i 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,061.381 � 1,061.381 0.0264 i 11,062.041 003 003 8 8 i 0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,061.381 1,061.381 0.0264 1,062.041 003 003 8 8 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •1 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 City Council 18 - 258 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 � ---------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+ ------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i I 0.0000 Worker •i 0.4734 i 0.2743 i 3.3220 0.0107 i 1.2171 � 9.4300e- 1.2266 i 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,061.381 � 1,061.381 0.0264 i 11,062.041 003 003 8 8 i 0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,061.381 1,061.381 0.0264 1,062.041 003 003 8 8 0 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile City Council 18 - 259 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 9.5233 i 45.9914 i 110.0422 i 0.4681 45.9592 i 0.3373 , 46.2965 i 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 i 47,917.80 47,917.80 2.1953 i : 47,972.68 •� . 05 05 i 39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 - 47,917.80 47,917.80 • 2.1953 - 47,972.68 05 05 39 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ......................................----------- ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information City Council 18 - 260 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy City Council 18 - 261 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 i 4.2573 0.0418 i i 0.5292 0.5292 i i 0.5292 0.5292 + i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 i 0.1532 1 8,405.638 Mitigated ;i . I 2 2 i 7 NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 • 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 • 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2 7 City Council 18 — 262 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low 1 1119.16 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- 1 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 1 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1------------------------------------------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------ � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1283.42 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- 1 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 •1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 1 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r-------1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel 1 4769.72 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 1 564.4782 1 1 1 1 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 Quality 1 5057.75 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � v 1 1 1 1 T""--- 251.616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 City Council 18 - 263 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low 1 1.11916 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- 1 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid i 35.7843 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 1 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1 1------- ----------------------------- -------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------71_----__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1.28342 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- 1 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22.7599 .1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 1 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r------�1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4.76972 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 1 564.4782 1 1 I I 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 -r------71 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 ------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �-------I-------1 1 1 T'------ Quality 5.05775 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T""--- 0.251616 •1 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 077 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area City Council 18 - 264 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 � 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 i i 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 118,259.11 50 50 � � 92 -------------i I Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 - 18,148.59 - 0.4874 - 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating i- ----------:'---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------*------- Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products •' . ' i Hearth •i 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 i i i i i i i 118,106.96 Landscaping •i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 1152.1542 003 i i i i i i i i i • Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 City Council 18 - 265 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 1.6500 i 14.1000 6.0000 i 0.0900 1.1400 i 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 i 18,000.00 18,000.00 i 0.3450 1 0.3300 118,106.96 ---- -- - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --- - -- ------------------------------ Landscaping i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 152.1542 003 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 j j F-777000 50 50 j 92 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment City Council 18 - 266 10/3/2023 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation City Council 18 — 267 10/3/2023 Attachment C Local Hire Provision Net Change Without Local Hire Provision Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 3,623 120.77 With Local Hire Provision Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Amortized (MT CO2e/year) % Decrease in Construction -related GHG Emissions 3,024 100.80 17% City Council 18 — 268 10/3/2023 EXHIBIT B City Council 18 — 269 10/3/2023 S WA P E Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Principal Environmental Chemist Education SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, California 90405 Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Mobil: (310) 795-2335 Office: (310) 452-5555 Fax: (310) 452-5550 Email: prosenfeld(i�swauexom Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration. M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics. B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment. Professional Experience Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years' experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling operations, oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, and many other industrial and agricultural sources. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at dozens of sites and has testified as an expert witness on more than ten cases involving exposure to air contaminants from industrial sources. Paul City Council 18 — 270 10/3/20232019 Professional History: Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 — 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 — 1999; Scientist James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications: Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342 Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632. Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125. Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327. Paul City Council 18 — 271 10/3/20232019 Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255. Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530. Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197. Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357. Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344. Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178. Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor -Quality -Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor. Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262. Paul City Council 18 - 272 10/3/20232019 Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California. Presentations: Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA. Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 231 Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium -Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23' Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Paul City Council 18 — 273 10/3/20232019 Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 231 Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 — 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOWN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust. Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona. Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ. Paul City Council 18 — 274 10/3/20232019 Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners. Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration. Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington.. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland. Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington. Paul City Council 18 — 275 10/3/20232019 Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Teaching Experience: UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants. National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks. National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites. California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design. UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation. University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability. U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10. Academic Grants Awarded: California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001. Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University. Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000. King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998. Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997. James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round -up. 1996. United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995. Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993 Paul City Council 18 — 276 10/3/20232019 Deposition and/or Trial Testimony: In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant. Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS "Conti Perdido' Defendant. Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636 Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857 Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19 In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case: No 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018 In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112' Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No 1923 Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481 Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017 In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. Oi9-L-2295 Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017 In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warm Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154) Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018 In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017 Paul City Council 18 — 277 10/3/20232019 In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5 Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017 Trial, March 2017 In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115 Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015 In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187 Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al. Civil Action NO. 14-C-30000 Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015 In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980 Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015 In the Circuit Court of the 17' Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant. Case Number CACE07030358 (26) Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014 In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants. Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014 Paul City Council 18 — 278 10/3/20232019 In the County Court of Dallas County Texas Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant. Case Number cc-11-01650-E Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant. Case 3: 1 0-cv-00622 Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013 In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013 Paul City Council 18 — 279 10/3/20232019 EXHIBIT C City Council 18 — 280 10/3/2023 IS p C Technical ConsuRation. DataAnalysis and G LiligakionSupportfor the Enxiroment Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP 1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa Santa Monica, California 90401 Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: mhagemann@swape.com Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization Industrial Stormwater Compliance Investigation and Remediation Strategies Litigation Support and Testifying Expert CEQA Review Education: M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984. B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982. Professional Certifications: California Professional Geologist California Certified Hydrogeologist Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner Professional Experience: Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques. Positions Matt has held include: • Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 — present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 — 2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); City Council 18 — 281 10/3/2023 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001- 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998); • Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 - 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 - 1998); • Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990-1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986-1998); and • Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984-1986). Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst: With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included: • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever. • Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells. • Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California. • Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant. With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following: • Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. 2 City Council 18 — 282 10/3/2023 Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production -related contamination in Mississippi. Lead author for a multi -volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 3 City Council 18 — 283 10/3/2023 • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators. Executive Director: As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. Hydrogeology: As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows: • Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater. • Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. • Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water. • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. 4 City Council 18 — 284 10/3/2023 Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer. Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows: • Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S. EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, Matt directed service -wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks: • Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed -scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park. • Identified high -levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup. • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. • Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi -Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Policy: Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following: • Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies. • Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy -making process. • Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 City Council 18 — 285 10/3/2023 Geology With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows: • Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following: Supervised year -long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. Conducted aquifer tests. Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teaching: From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels: At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination. Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014. Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations: Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon. Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S. EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California. Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles. City Council 18 — 286 10/3/2023 Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter -Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant. Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report. City Council 18 — 287 10/3/2023 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City. Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996. Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 0 City Council 18 — 288 10/3/2023 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35. Other Experience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011. a City Council 18 — 289 10/3/2023 P: (626) 314-3821 0 139 South Hudson Avenue F: (626) 389-5414 Mitchell M. Tsai Suite 200 E: info@mitchtsailaw.com Attorney At Law Pasadena, California 91101 VIA E-MAIL August 17, 2023 Pedro Gomez City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Centre Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 Em:12 o� santa-ana.org RE: Appeal No. 2023-03: Cabrillo Town Center Project Dear Mr. Gomez and City of Santa Ana, On behalf of the Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters ("Southwest Mountain States Carpenters" or "SWMSRCC"), my Office is submitting these supplemental comments to the City of Santa Ana ("City") regarding its appeal, No. 2023-03, of the Planning Commission's approval of the Cabrillo Town Center project (Project"). The Project proposes construction of a mixed -use 5-story wrap development with 26,800 sqft. of leasable commercial space, 449 residential units, a townhome community with six 3-story buildings containing 58 units, and associated parking, open space, landscaping, and amenities. The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters is a labor union representing 63,000 union carpenters in 10 states, including California, and has a strong interest in well -ordered land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects. Individual members of SWMSRCC live, work, and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project's environmental impacts. The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters incorporates by reference all previously submitted comments raising issues regarding the environmental assessment for the Project, including but not limited to its April 24, 2023; May 3, 2023; and May 16, 2023 comment. See Citi-Zens for Clean Energy v City of iloodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, City Council 18 — 290 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 2 of 3 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the project's environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised). As noted in our previous comment letters, contrary to the City's finding that no subsequent EIR is necessary pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines because the Project is within the scope of Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone EIR ("Metro EIR") and that there are no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances or new necessary mitigation measures, SWMSRCC maintains that there have been substantial changes to the Project and Project circumstances, and new information of substantial importance which has come out since the certification of the Metro EIR. Thus, a subsequent EIR must be prepared pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. A. The Project Must Comply with New Transportation Impact Methodology Requirements In July 2020, Senate Bill ("SB") 743 took effect in order to help reduce transportation impacts. Specifically, in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas impacts and create long term sustainability, SB 743 changed the standard for evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA from a Level of Service ("LOS") standard to Vehicle Miles Traveled ("VMT") standard. Thus, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section 15064.3(a), VMT "is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts". Here, the Metro EIR, which was certified in 2007, uses the outdated LOS methodology to analyze traffic and transportation impacts. Metro PEIR at 4.12-9, et seq.' Thus, a subsequent EIR analyzing the Project's VMT is necessary in order to adequately assess the Project's transportation impacts and comply with CEQA, especially when considering that the Metro EIR found significant and unavoidable trans portation inpacts given the substantial increase in traffic. Id. at 4.12-54. Further, as noted by transportation expert Norman L. Marshall, such failure to conduct VMT analysis not only conflicts with CEQA but also the City of Santa Ana's adopted Resolution No. 2019-049 ("Resolution") since the Project does not satisfy the three categories of projects identified by the Resolution that are screened from complete VMT analysis. August 3, 2023 Letter from Norman L. Marshall to Talia Nimmer ("Exhibit A"). Specifically, the Resolution provides that projects can be screened from VMT analysis when they are (1) in a transit priority area; (2) in a low 'The EIR can be found at htWs://www.santa-ana.org/metro-east-mixed-use-overlay-zone/. City Council 18 — 291 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 3 of 4 VMT area; or (3) presumed to have less than a significant VMT impact because it is a local serving retail project of less than 50,000 sgft., is a neighborhood school, or will generate less than 110 daily trips. Id. at 2. Given that the Project is located outside of the Resolution's identified transit priority and low VMT areas; is predominantly a housing project, i.e., not local -serving retail or a school; and will generate approx. 2,751 daily trips, 875 more daily trips than the existing land use on the project site, the Project fails to satisfy any of the Resolution's three VMT screens. Thus, the City's Resolution requires a VMT analysis with the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model ("OCTAM"), which has not been done. Id. at 5. A subsequent EIR must be prepared which includes such analysis by the City's own requirements. B. The City's Transportation Mitigation Requirement is Infeasible for the Project In addition to failing to comply with the Resolution requirement to prepare a VMT analysis with OCTAM for the Project, the Project further likely runs afoul to the Resolution's mandate that "[o]nce a significant impact is identified, the project's VMT per capita should be mitigated to be at or less than 15% below the existing Countywide VMT [service population]." Exhibit A at 5. This is because, as noted by transportation expert Noman Marshall, should a significant VMT impact be determined after a VMT analysis with OCTAM is conducted for the Project "[a]chieving significant VMT mitigation at this Project site may be impossible". Id. Specifically, parking measures which encourage residents to shift trips from autos to walking, biking, and transit, such as limiting residential parking supply and unbundling residential parking costs from property cost, do not work well in auto -oriented areas Eke the Project site which is auto -oriented. Id. at 8. Moreover, unbundling residential parking costs is in fact explicitly prohibited by the City. Accordingly, should a significant impact be determined during the necessary VMT analysis for the Project, which is likely the case given the Metro EIR and Project's Revised Traffic Circulation Analysis findings, the Project will further conflict with the City's Resolution since its transportation mitigation requirement is infeasible. Thus, for this reason too, a subsequent EIR must be conducted in order to assess whether the Project can adequately mitigate the Project's transportation impacts and whether the Project conflicts with the City's Resolution. City Council 18 — 292 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 4of5 C...... The Metro EIR Fails to Adequately Analyze the Project's Noise Impacts Yet another reason why a subsequent EIR must be prepared is because the Metro EIR does not adequately analyze the Project's noise impacts for several reasons. i. The Metro EIR Fails to Identi ft All Nearby Sensitive Receptors First, as noted by noise expert Steve Rogers, the Metro EIR does not adequately describe the environmental setting of the Project because it fails to capture all of the nearby sensitive receptors. June 29, 2023 Letter from Steve Rogers to Talia Nimmer ("Exhibit B"). Specifically, although the Metro EIR identifies a total of 15 nearby sensitive receptors, the locations selected are almost all on busy streets or close to freeways, and therefore do not represent quieter locations that are set back and/or shielded from major traffic routes. Id. at 2; Metro EIR at 4.9-3. For example, the Metro EIR fails to include the Lake Dianne Apartments complex, which is located immediately northeast of the Project site and represents the closest sensitive receivers to the sources of noise associated with the Project. Exhibit B at 2. Thus, a subsequent EIR must be prepared to assess ambient noise conditions for receivers further away from major traffic routes and/or shielded by intervening structures such as the Lake Diane apartment complex. ii. The Metro EIR Fails to Adequately Characteri.Ze Ambient Noise Conditions With regard to the sensitive receptors which the Metro EIR does identify, it fails to adequately characterize their ambient noise conditions. Rather, the sensitive receptors are short-term (15-minute), daytime readings only and therefore do not capture the quieter evening and nighttime periods, when any noise impacts from the Project will be more disruptive to nearby receivers. Id. at 1. Further, they are insufficient to determine 24-hour weighted average noise metrics, such as Community Noise Equivalent Level ("CNEL" ), which is the basis of the noise standards in the City of Santa Ana General Plan. Id. at 2. A subsequent EIR must be prepared to adequately characterize the ambient noise conditions by (1) conducting 24-hour baseline noise measurements at locations selected to represent baseline ambient noise conditions at all sensitive receivers around the Project site; and (2) conducting continuous monitoring or, at a minimum, conducting 15- minute readings at 9AM — 5PM (daytime); 8PM — 10PM (evening); and 1AM — 3AM (nighttime). Id. at 5. City Council 18 — 293 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 5 of 6 iii. The Metro EIR's Significance Threshold Is Inadequate The CEQA Guidelines require that both temporary/periodic and permanent noise impacts be identified and addressed. Exhibit B at 2; see CEQA Guidelines Appendix G at 11; see also CEQA Guidelines §5 15126; 15126.2(a). However, the thresholds of significance proposed in the Metro EIR would apply to operational (i.e. permanent) noise impacts only. Exhibit B at 2; Metro EIR at 4.9-14. Moreover, the Metro EIR contends that noise level increases less than 5 dba are insignificant so long as the CNEL at sensitive receptors is below 65 dba. Id. However, it would be quite possible for noise from the Project to exceed the allowed limits according to the Santa Ana Municipal Code while remaining well below the proposed CNEL 65 significance threshold. For example, as noted by noise expert Steve Rogers: the nighttime noise limit in the Municipal Code for continuous noise — such as air- conditioning — is 50 dBA (SAMC Section 18-312), for receivers where the ambient (nighttime) noise level is less than 50 dBA, which is likely the case for much of the Lake Dianne property. In this scenario, a continuous noise source that runs 24-hours per day and produces 53 dBA on the neighboring property would be out of compliance with the Municipal Code, but would result in a CNEL of less than 60. Accordingly, a subsequent EIR must be prepared which revises the threshold of significance as follows: Any temporag orpermanent noise impact resulting from the Project shall be considered significant if either one of the following conditions apply: (1) the Project results in noise levels in excess of standards established in the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code or General Plan; or (2) the Project results in a noise level increase of 5 dBA or more. iv. The Metro EIR's Construction Noise Analysis and Mitigation Measures Must Be Revised The Metro EIR states that the impact of noise due to construction in the overlay zone could be substantial, even with mitigation, but that these impacts should be considered less -than -significant because the noise of construction is temporary and exempt from the noise limits in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Exhibit B at 3; Metro EIR at 4.9-15. However, the characterization of construction noise impacts as less than significant is inconsistent with the CEQA Guidelines since, as the Metro EIR acknowledges, implementation of the Project may result in a significant adverse City Council 18 — 294 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 6 of 7 impact on noise if the Project would cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the Project. Exhibit B at 3; Metro EIR at 4.9-14. Additionally, the Metro EIR's imposed mitigation measure for constriction noise impacts are improperly deferred since they are vague in nature and would likely be difficult or impossible to enforce in practice. For example, MM-OZ 4.9-2 includes requirements to: "Place noise -generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses, where feasible" "Schedule high noise -producing activities between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to minimize disruption on sensitive uses"; and "Implement noise attenuation measures, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources". Metro EIR at 4.9-17. Use of the phrase "where feasible" provides a workaround, allowing the construction crew to locate equipment and stage materials as close as they see fit to sensitive neighbors. Similarly, there is no definition of the "high noise -producing activities," which should cease at 5PM, or the amount of reduction required to be achieved by noise barriers/blankets around equipment. Absent such specification, the measures are improperly deferred. See CEQA Guidelines � 15126.4 ("Formulation of mitigation measures shall not be deferred until some future time"). As recommended by noise expert Steve Rogers, a subsequent EIR must be prepared to adequately analyze and mitigate the Project's construction impacts by: (1) providing a Project -specific list of the types of equipment to be used during the various phases of demolition and construction, which identifies source noise levels (FHWA reference values) as well as the number of pieces to be employed for each phase and equipment type; (2) including a clear statement whether the Project will deliberately exclude any particularly noisy construction equipment/activities (such as pile -driving); (3) revising the construction noise analysis to reflect the total impact of all proposed equipment operating together, rather than a single piece of equipment operating in isolation; and (4) revising mitigation measure MM-OZ 4.9-2, so that bullet points 3 through 6 read as follows: • Place noise -generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses. City Council 18 — 295 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 7of8 • Restrict any activities that result in noise levels in excess of the Thresholds of Significance to the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM to minimize disruption of sensitive uses. • Implement noise barriers or noise blankets around construction equipment to achieve a minimum noise level reduction of 15 dBA. • Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment. i. The Metro EIR's Operation Noise Analysis Underestimates the Projects Impacts Finally, the Metro EIR's operation noise analysis and mitigation measures must be revised. The Metro EIR includes an analysis of HVAC noise associated with new developments in the overlay zon,. The calculation starts with the assumption that HVAC systems "can result in noise levels that average between 50 and 65 dBA, Leq at 50-feet from the equipment", then reasons that shielding around rooftop equipment might typically be expected to provide 15 dBA of noise reduction, resulting in a net noise level at 50-feet of 50 dBA. Metro EIR at 4.9-19. For equipment that runs 24- hours per day, the preparers point out that the relationship between the Leq noise level and the CNEL is 6.7 dBA, so that an Leq of 50 dBA at 50-feet would equate to a CNEL of 57. And since 57 CNEL falls below the proposed 65 CNEL significance threshold, the Metro EIR concludes that HVAC noise is less than significant. As noted by noise expert Steve Rogers, such analysis is problematic for at least two reasons. Firstly, the estimate of HVAC unit noise seems too low for a mixed -use project that will likely have hundreds of HVAC units operating simultaneously. This is because the combined effect of multiple similar noise sources grouped together is calculated from the equation: Total Noise Level = Noise Level for Single Source x 10*LOG10 (Number of Sources) So, while we would expect that a single AC unit, serving a single apartment could produce a noise level of approximately 55 dBA at 50-feet, a grouping of 100 units (for example serving one section of the building) would have a total noise level of 55 + 10*LOGio (100) = 75 dBA at 50- feet. Larger, commercial -grade equipment associated with the commercial and office portions of the project as well as ventilation fans for the parking structure (if required) would likely produce more noise City Council 18 — 296 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 8 of 9 than residential AC units, further adding to the noise sum for surrounding receivers. It is therefore likely that the analysis in the MEMU EIR substantially underestimates the total HVAC noise impact of the project. The second problem with the HVAC noise analysis in the [Metro] EIR is that (like the proposed thresholds of significance) it overlooks the noise limits in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The SAMC requires that noise from continuous sources — such as HVAC equipment — be limited to 50 dBA at night, unless the ambient noise level on the receiving property is greater than 50 dBA, in which case the ambient noise level becomes the noise limit. We expect that nighttime ambient noise levels on much of the Lake Dianne property are less than 50 dBA, so that the allowable limit for the combined noise of all HVAC equipment associated with the project is 50 dBA, not CNEL 65 as the MEMU EIR suggests. Exhibit B at 4. Accordingly, the analysis presented in the Metro EIR does not adequately demonstrate that HVAC noise associated with the Project will be less than significant. Moreover, the Project would include a significant amount of active and passive open space and outdoor amenities, including a 7,500 square -foot roof terrace, which would accommodate uses such as outdoor dining, game terrace, and view deck. According to the Planning Commission staff report, the roof terrace would be equipped with synthetic turf (possibly for sports)m a media wall, and festival lighting, suggesting nighttime use. However, the analysis in Metro EIR does not consider the potential for operational noise impacts associated with the type of outdoor amenities proposed for the Project and does not, therefore, demonstrate that any such impact is less than significant. Exhibit B at 4-5. A subsequent EIR must be prepared which (1) revises the operational noise impact analysis to reflect the combined all of the equipment in the project HVAC system; (2) includes an evaluation of Project design features that would be incorporated into the building design to attenuate HVAC noise — such as equipment screens, duct silencers, etc.; (3) includes revised analysis adequately demonstrating that HVAC noise from the Project will be controlled to the point where it: (a) complies with the noise standards in the SAMC, and (b) limits noise level increases at surrounding sensitive uses to less than 5 dBA; (4) includes the outdoor amenities in the operational noise impact analysis, which provides realistic evaluation of crowd noise, sports/games, amplified sound, AV systems, etc. and should recognize the more stringent standards in the City Council 18 — 297 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 9 of 10 SAMC that apply to impact noise (balls bouncing) speech and music; and (5) supplements the operational noise mitigation measures as necessary to address noise from outdoor amenities, including but not limited to: limiting hours of use and/or occupancy of outdoor areas, additional noise shielding/screening features in the project design, limiting playback levels for outdoor amplified sound systems, etc. D. The Project Requires New Feasible Mitigation Measures to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Impacts The Project at hand also requires new feasible mitigation measures not specified in the PEIR such as electric vehicle ("EV") parking and charging stations and solar system installation. Such measures are of particular importance given the Metro EIR failed entirely to assess greenhouse gas ("GHG") impacts. Metro EIR at 4-1 — 4-2. First, although the Project is slated to provide 898 parking stalls, the Master EIR fails to specify the new requirement that residential buildings must designate 10% of their parking spaces as EV capable, equip 25% of the parking spaces with low power level 2 EV charging receptacles, and equip 5% of the spaces with level 2 EV supply equipment. GBC 4.106.4.2. Further, the Metro EIR fails to include a mitigation measure requiring the installation of photovoltaic and battery system, as required by section 1040.10 of the 2022 Energy Efficiency Standards. Thus, a subsequent EIR must be prepared to specify and incorporate these additional feasible mitigation measures. E. The Project May Have Significant Land Use Impacts Which Were Not Analyzed in the Metro EIR Finally, the Project may have significant unanalyzed land use impacts stemming from the Project's request for a tentative tract map ("TTM"), which the Metro EIR failed to analyze. Specifically, the Metro EIR provides that the: project approvals include certification of the EIR for the proposed project, as well as adoption of the Overlay Zone and associated General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. This EIR is intended as a Program EIR, and specific developmentproposals made in the Overlay Zone would be subject to separate environmental clearance/review. Metro EIR at 3-17. Thus, a subsequent EIR must be prepared which specifically analyzes the Project's TTM request in its land use consistency analysis. City Council 18 — 298 10/3/2023 City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project August 17, 2023 Page 10 of 10 Additionally, the Project runs afoul to the General Plan since it fails to provide any affordable housing units. One policy of the General Plan is to "encourage private and commercial recreational facilities that are physically open to the public and are affordable to residents of surrounding neighborhoods". General Plan, Policy OS-1.10. Similarly, the General Plan provides that the City must "explore development and subdivision options that promote new opportunities for sustainable, livable, and affordable development." General Plan, Policy UD-2.8. As the Project at hand provides no affordable housing units, it conflicts with the General Plan. For this reason too, a subsequent EIR is warranted to assess the Project's land use impacts. V. CONCLUSION For all of the foregoing reasons, SWMSRCC respectfully request that the City grant its appeal and require that the City prepare a subsequent EIR for the Project to be CEQA compliant. If the City has any questions, feel free to contact my office. Sincerely, Talia Nimmer Attorneys for Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters Attached: Exhibit A: August 3, 2023 Letter from Norman L. Marshall to Talia Nimmer; and Exhibit B: June 29, 2023 Letter from Steve Rogers to Talia Nimmer. City Council 18 — 299 10/3/2023 EXHIBIT A City Council 18 — 300 10/3/2023 smart mobility 794 Sawnee Bean Road Thetford Center VT 05075 Norman Marshall, President (802) 356-2969 nmarshall@smartmobility.com August 3, 2023 Talia Nimmer Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law 139 South Hudson Avenue Suite 200 Pasadena, CA 91101 Subject: Comments on the Cabrillo Town Center Project Dear Ms. Nimmer, I have reviewed vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") impacts of the proposed 20 Civic Center Plaza project in Santa Ana as described in the Planning Commission Staff Report, dated April 24, 2023, and the attached Revised Traffic Circulation Analysis, dated November 18, 2022. 1 make the following findings: 1) SB 743 requires that vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") impacts be analyzed under CEQA. These impacts have not been analyzed for the proposed project. 2) The City of Santa Ana has adopted a Resolution and Guidelines for evaluating project VMT impacts that include three categories of projects that are screened from complete analysis. The proposed project does not satisfy any of these screens. As the project fails to satisfy any of the City's three VMT screens, the City's Resolution requires a VMT analysis with the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model ("OCTAM"). This OCTAM analysis is required for this project and has not been done. 3) If the OCTAM analysis results in a significant VMT impact, the Guidelines require mitigation to "15% below the existing Countywide VMT/SP" [Service Population]. 4) The proposed project is in an auto -oriented, VMT-inefficient part of the City of Santa Ana, and the project's location also will largely preclude significant mitigation of its VMT impacts. One of the VMT-reduction measures recommended by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), unbundling residential parking costs and rents, is prohibited by the City of Santa Ana. City Council 18 — 301 10/3/2023 The Applicant Fails to Quantify the Project's VMT Impacts As Required SB 743 requires that vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") impacts be analyzed under CEQA. These impacts have not been analyzed for the proposed project. The City of Santa Ana has adopted Resolution No. 2019-049 entitled A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana Adopting "Vehicle Miles Traveled" Thresholds of Significance for purposes of Analyzing Transportation Impacts Under the California Environmental Quality Act. The City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines attached to the Resolution states: The City of Santa Ana has identified Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the metric for transportation impact analysis in all traffic studies in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and California Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). The City of Santa Ana has prepared these Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines for assessing potential transportation impacts of proposed development projects, General Plan Amendments, and changes to the zoning in the City. For land use projects (including this proposed project), the Resolution identifies three categories where projects can be screened from more complete VMT analysis: • Transit Priority Area (TPA), • Low VMT area, • Project type. Figure 1 reproduces the vicinity map from the Revised Traffic Circulation Analysis. Figure 1: Vicinity Map City Council >a�.„O p .. � a v pR.,..�•Ia .., y e map < > Ip LiW i._Gn,nr© �Rnl>ne• q,u ¢Cvf RIURVM!^�A•IN n�. �,•...axP.Q 'a S 1-.Ru}swnmenn 18-302 FIGURE 1-1 VIVINM M" ] PRC.ECr. 5PNTA .1 10/3/2023 2 The City's Guidelines includes maps of the first two screening categories, and a map that combines them — preproduced here as Figure 2. Figure 2: Santa Ana Development Areas that Cannot Be Screened [re VMT] t 7AZ VMT! SP not at least 151% below County Average and is not inside of a7ransit Priority Area y" Appendix C !EA Santa Ana Development Areas that Cannot Be Screened City Council 18 — 303 10/3/2023 Figure 3 reproduces a portion of Figure 2 with increased contrast to show the street grid, along with the approximate location of the proposed project. The project is within the area that "cannot be screened." Figure 3: Approximate Project Location Shown to Be in Area that "Cannot Be Screened" The third screening criteria includes three types of projects that are presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact including: • Local serving retail projects of less than 50,000 square feet, • Neighborhood schools, and • Projects that generate less than 110 daily trips. City Council 18 — 304 10/3/2023 4 The proposed project satisfies none of these categories. It is predominantly a housing project, i.e., not local -serving retail or a school. The Revised Traffic Circulation Analysis estimates that the project would generate 2,751 daily trips after an adjustment for internal capture, and 875 more daily trips than the existing land use on the project site, i.e., much more than 110 daily trips. (Table 5-1, p. 19) As the project fails to satisfy any of the City's three VMT screens, the City's Resolution requires a VMT analysis with the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model ("OCTAM"). This OCTAM analysis is required for this project and has not been done. A Significant VMT Impact Must Be Mitigated The Resolution states: A Significant impact would occur if the project causes total daily VMT within the City to be higher than the no project alternative under cumulative conditions. This analysis should be performed using the 'project effect' method. The Guidelines attached to the Resolution state: Once a significant impact is identified, the project's VMT per capita should be mitigated to be at or less than 15% below the existing Countywide VMT/SP. Mitigation should consist of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures analyzed under a VMT-reduction methodology consistent with Chapter 7 of the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (August 2010) and approved by the City's Traffic Engineering Division. Since the City's Guidelines were adopted, CAPCOA has updated its guidance with the publication of its Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity: Designed for Local Governments, Communities, and Project Developers (Final Draft, December2021). This newer publication states: The Handbook builds on CAPCOA's previous efforts to provide accurate and reliable quantification measures. In 2010, CAPCOA published Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Government to Assess Emissions Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (hereafter referred to as the "2010 Handbook"). Since that time, climate science has evolved and GHG reduction practices have advanced in sophistication. New priorities have also arisen, such as strengthening climate resilience and infusing health and equity into integrated planning efforts. Therefore, CAPCOA decided it was time to develop an updated and expanded resource to provide the latest data and methods to quantify GHG emissions reductions, climate change vulnerability reductions, and equity improvements in a single resource: The Handbook. (p. 2-3) The City's VMT Guidelines are best followed by applying the updated CAPCOA Handbook. Achieving significant VMT mitigation at this project site may be impossible. The Handbook includes 14 quantified VMT reduction measures at the Project/Site scale (p. 63). 9 of the 14 measures involve trip reduction projects that are not applicable to the predominantly residential character of the proposed project. The other 5 measures include 3 land use measures and 2 parking measures. City Council 18 — 305 10/3/2023 The land use measures are applicable to residential development include: • T-1 Increase Residential Density, • T-3 Provide Transit -Oriented Development, and • T-4 Integrate Affordable and Below Market Rate Housing. The proposed project is denser than the surrounding area (Measure T-1), and density is associated with lower VMT. However, the Handbook states: "This measure is best quantified when applied to larger developments and developments where the density is somewhat similar to the surrounding area due to the underlying research being founded in data from the neighborhood." (p. 70) The VMT benefits of density are highly correlated with being in walkable mixed -use neighborhoods. As shown in Figure 4, the proposed project is not within a higher -density mixed use neighborhood. There appears to be no housing of similar density in the neighborhood today. A large proportion of the land use is devoted to autos including freeways, wide streets, and surface parking. In the immediate vicinity of the proposed project, 41h Street is a 6-lane divided roadway posted at 40 mph and Cabrillo Park Drive is a four -lane, divided roadway posted at 35 mph (Revised Traffic Circulation Analysis, p. 8). Therefore, the VMT- reduction benefits of density in this location are uncertain. Figure 4: Project Vicinity The proposed project is not a transit -oriented development (TOD) (Measure T-3). The Handbook states: "TOD refers to projects built in compact, walkable areas that have easy access to public transit, ideally in a location with a mix of uses, including housing, retail offices, and community facilities." As shown in Figure 5, although most of the City of Santa Ana is within Transit Priority Areas (within a half mile of a Metrolink Station and/or a High -Quality Bus Stop), but the proposed project is not. City Council 18 — 306 10/3/2023 A Figure 5: Santa Ana Transit Priority Areas (Reproduced from the City's Guidelines) OC Metrolink Rail Half Mile Bufferaround htetFolink Station Half Mile around High Quality Bus Stops Appendix A Santa Ana Transit PrloritvAreas City Council 18 — 307 10/3/2023 The proposed project does not integrate affordable and below market rate housing (Measure T-4). Instead of including affordable housing in the project, the "applicant has selected the option to pay in - lieu fees." (Staff Letter, p. 4-6) The parking VMT-reduction measures documented in the Handbook include: • T-15 Limit Residential Parking Supply, and • T-16 Unbundle Residential Parking Costs from Property Cost, and Both parking measures encourage residents to shift trips from autos to walking, biking, and transit. The Handbook states: Limiting the amount of parking available creates scarcity and adds additional time and inconvenience to trips made by private auto, thus disincentivizing driving as a mode of travel. (Measure T-15) On the assumption that parking costs are passed through to the vehicle owners/drivers utilizing the parking spaces, this measure results in decreased vehicle ownership and, therefore, a reduction in VMT and GHG emissions. (Measure T-16) The Handbook cautions that these measures may not work well in auto -oriented areas like the area where the proposed project is sited. The Handbook states: When limiting parking supply, a best practice is to do so at sites that are located near high quality alternative modes of travel (such as a rail station, frequent bus line, or in a higher density area with multiple walkable locations nearby). (Measure T-15) Measure T-16, unbundling residential parking costs, is explicitly prohibited by the City of Santa Ana. Its document, Off -Street Parking Requirements, states: No owner or agent of any owner of multiple -family residential property shall impose any charge on any resident for the privilege of parking in the offstreet parking spaces on such property which is separate and distinct from the rent charged to such resident for such resident's dwelling unit.' The proposed project is in an auto -oriented, VMT-inefficient part of the City of Santa Ana, and the project's location also will largely preclude significant mitigation of its VMT impacts. Sincerely, Norman L. Marshall ' https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/03/Off-Street Parkingll-17.pdf, p. 5 of 17. City Council 18 — 308 10/3/2023 Resume NORMAN L. MARSHALL, PRESIDENT nmarshall@smartmobility.com EDUCATION: Master of Science in Engineering Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1982 Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 1977 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: (32 Years, 18 at Smart Mobility, Inc.) Norm Marshall helped found Smart Mobility, Inc. in 2001. Prior to this, he was at RSG for 14 years where he developed a national practice in travel demand modeling. He specializes in analyzing the relationships between the built environment and travel behavior and doing planning that coordinates multi -modal transportation with land use and community needs. Regional Land Use/Transportation Scenario Planning Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation System (PACTS) — the Portland Maine Metropolitan Planning Organization. Updating regional travel demand model with new data (including AirSage), adding a truck model, and multiclass assignment including differentiation between cash toll and transponder payments. Loudoun County Virginia Dynamic Traffic Assignment — Enhanced subarea travel demand model to include Dynamic Traffic Assignment (Cube). Model being used to better understand impacts of roadway expansion on induced travel. Vermont Agency of Transportation -Enhanced statewide travel demand model to evaluate travel impacts of closures and delays resulting from severe storm events. Model uses innovate Monte Carlo simulations process to account for combinations of failures. California Air Resources Board — Led team including the University of California in $250k project that reviewed the ability of the new generation of regional activity -based models and land use models to accurately account for greenhouse gas emissions from alternative scenarios including more compact walkable land use and roadway pricing. This work included hands-on testing of the most complex travel demand models in use in the U.S. today. Climate Plan (California statewide) — Assisted large coalition of groups in reviewing and participating in the target setting process required by Senate Bill 375 and administered by the California Air Resources Board to reduce future greenhouse gas emissions through land use measures and other regional initiatives. Chittenden County (2060 Land use and Transportation Vision Burlington Vermont region) — led extensive public visioning project as part of MPO's long-range transportation plan update. Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization — Implemented walk, transit and bike models within regional travel demand model. The bike model includes skimming bike networks including on -road and off -road bicycle facilities with a bike level of service established for each segment. Chicago Metropolis Plan and Chicago Metropolis Freight Plan (6-county region)— developed alternative transportation scenarios, made enhancements in the regional travel demand model, and used the enhanced City Council 18 — 309 10/3/2023 model to evaluate alternative scenarios including development of alternative regional transit concepts. Developed multi -class assignment model and used it to analyze freight alternatives including congestion pricing and other peak shifting strategies. Municipal Planning City of Grand Rapids — Michigan Street Corridor — developed peak period subarea model including non - motorized trips based on urban form. Model is being used to develop traffic volumes for several alternatives that are being additional analyzed using the City's Synchro model City of Omaha - Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for non -motorized trips, transit trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed -use development. Scenarios with different roadway, transit, and land use alternatives were modeled. City of Dublin (Columbus region) — Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for non - motorized trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed -use development. The model was applied in analyses for a new downtown to be constructed in the Bridge Street corridor on both sides of an historic village center. City of Portland, Maine — Implemented model improvements that better account for non -motorized trips and interactions between land use and transportation and applied the enhanced model to two subarea studies. City of Honolulu — Kaka'ako Transit Oriented Development (TOD) — applied regional travel demand model in estimating impacts of proposed TOD including estimating internal trip capture. City of Burlington (Vermont) Transportation Plan — Led team that developing Transportation Plan focused on supporting increased population and employment without increases in traffic by focusing investments and policies on transit, walking, biking and Transportation Demand Management. Transit Planning Regional Transportation Authority (Chicago) and Chicago Metropolis 2020 — evaluated alternative 2020 and 2030 system -wide transit scenarios including deterioration and enhance/expand under alternative land use and energy pricing assumptions in support of initiatives for increased public funding. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Austin, TX) Transit Vision — analyzed the regional effects of implementing the transit vision in concert with an aggressive transit -oriented development plan developed by Calthorpe Associates. Transit vision includes commuter rail and BRT. Bus Rapid Transit for Northern Virginia HOT Lanes (Breakthrough Technologies, Inc and Environmental Defense.) — analyzed alternative Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) strategies for proposed privately -developing High Occupancy Toll lanes on 1-95 and 1-495 (Capital Beltway) including different service alternatives (point-to-point services, trunk lines intersecting connecting routes at in -line stations, and hybrid). Roadway Corridor Planning 1-30 Little Rock Arkansas — Developed enhanced version of regional travel demand model that integrates TransCAD with open source Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) software, and used to model 1-30 alternatives. Freeway bottlenecks are modeled much more accurately than in the base TransCAD model. City Council 18 — 310 10/3/2023 10 South Evacuation Lifeline (SELL) — In work for the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, used Dynamic Travel Assignment (DTA) to estimate evaluation times with different transportation alternatives in coastal South Caroline including a new proposed freeway. Hudson River Crossing Study (Capital District Transportation Committee and NYSDOT) — Analyzing long term capacity needs for Hudson River bridges which a special focus on the 1-90 Patroon Island Bridge where a microsimulation VISSIM model was developed and applied. PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS (partial list) DTA Love: Co -leader of workshop on Dynamic Traffic Assignment at the June 2019 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference. Forecasting the Impossible: The Status Quo of Estimating Traffic Flows with Static Traffic Assignment and the Future of Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Research in Transportation Business and Management 2018. Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the August 2018 Transportation Research Board Tools of the Trade Conference on Transportation Planning for Small and Medium Sized Communities. Vermont Statewide Resilience Modeling. With Joseph Segale, James Sullivan and Roy Schiff. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference. Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference. Pre -Destination Choice Walk Mode Choice Modeling. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference. A Statistical Model of Regional Traffic Congestion in the United States, presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. MEMBERSHIPS/AFFILIATIONS Associate Member, Transportation Research Board (TRB) Member and Co -Leader Project for Transportation Modeling Reform, Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) City Council 18 — 311 10/3/2023 11 EXHIBIT B City Council 18 — 312 10/3/2023 Steve Rogers Acoustics June 29, 2023 Talia Nimmer Mitchel M. Tsai, Attorney at Law 139 South Hudson Avenue, Suite 200 Pasadena CA 91101 talia(@mitchtsailaw.com Subject: Cabrillo Town Center Project, Santa Ana Review of Environmental Noise Analysis Dear Talia: We have completed a review of environmental noise analysis that supported the City Planning Commission staff recommendation to approve of the Site Plan Review and Tentative Tract Map for the Cabrillo Town Center project in Santa Ana. Here are our findings: OVERVIEW The project site is within the bounds of the Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. • In its Site Plan Review and Tentative Tract Map evaluation, the City of Santa Ana Planning Commission has relied on the findings and recommendations of the MEMU Environmental Impact Report dated March 2007 and Supplemental Impact Report dated August 2018. • The closing paragraph on page 12 of the Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 24, 2023 includes this statement: "The previously prepared 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR adequately described the project's environmental setting, significant impacts and alternatives, and mitigation measures related to each impact. " We disagree. In our opinion, there are aspects of the noise analysis in the MEMU EIR/SEIR that do not adequately describe the environmental setting of the Cabrillo Town Center project. We also find that the evaluation of noise impacts in the MEMU EIR/SEIR does not capture the full scope of likely noise sources associated with a large mixed -use project and is based on thresholds of significance that overlook key local regulations. • Additional study — including field work — is required to adequately evaluate the potential noise impacts of the Cabrillo Town Center project and determine additional mitigation measures/features necessary to adequately protect neighboring residential uses. AMBIENT NOISE BASELINE, OVERLOOKED SENSITIVE RECEIVERS Section 4.9 of the MEMU EIR reports results of a series of noise measurements made at a total of 15 monitoring locations in and around the MEMU area, as shown in Figure 4.9-1 and described in table 4.9-3. These measurements do not adequately characterize the baseline noise condition at sensitive receivers around the project site because: - They are short-term (15-minute), daytime readings only and do not therefore capture the quieter evening and nighttime periods, when any noise impacts from the project will be more disruptive to nearby receivers. City Council 18 — 313 10/3/2023 2355 Westwood Boulevard, Suite 411 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Tel: 310.234.0939 rogersacoustics.com Cabrillo Town Center Project, Santa Ana Review of Environmental Noise Analysis June 29, 2023 Page 2 of 6 They are insufficient to determine 24-hour weighted average noise metrics, such as Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which is the basis of the noise standards in the City of Santa Ana General Plan. The selected monitoring locations do not represent noise conditions on the Lake Dianne Apartments complex, which is located immediately northeast of the project site. The apartments here represent the closest sensitive receivers to the sources of noise associated with the project. The monitoring locations selected for the baseline noise evaluation are almost all on busy streets or close to freeways, which do not represent quieter locations that are set back and/or shielded from major traffic routes — such as the apartments on the Lake Dianne property. In Table 4.9-4, the MEMU EIR provides "reference" CNEL values for an extensive list of road segments around the Overlay Zone area, which have been calculated using the Federal Highway Administration Noise Prediction Model. However, these projected noise levels are for hypothetical off -site receivers located very close to busy streets (50-ft from the centerline) and do not help characterize ambient noise conditions for receivers further away from major traffic routes and/or shielded by intervening structures. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The noise impact assessment for the MEMU was based on thresholds of significance defined on page 4.9-14 of the EIR. • As we would expect, reference is made to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines; however, the significance thresholds themselves are problematic for the following reasons: - Temporary/Periodic Impacts are Excluded CEQA Guidelines require that both temporary/periodic and permanent noise impacts be identified and addressed. However, the thresholds of significance proposed in the MEMU EIR would apply to operational (permanent) noise impacts only. - Increase of less than 3 dBA The preparers propose that any increase in noise, whether temporary or long-term, should be considered insignificant if it is less than 3 dBA. While it is true that a noise increase of 3 dBA would not be discernable to most people, it is also possible that a 3 dBA increase could make the difference between complying with local noise regulations (City of Santa Ana Municipal Code and General Plan) and not. In other words, there may be situations where a 3 dBA increase in noise level would — according to the CEQA Guidelines, as quoted on page 4.9-14 of the EIR — constitute a "significant adverse impact". - Increase of less than 3 dBA, more than 5 dBA The MEMU EIR suggests that a noise level increase of more than 3 dBA but less than 5 dBA should be considered less than significant so long as the CNEL at sensitive land uses, including residential uses, is below 65. However, it would be quite possible for noise from the project to exceed the allowed limits according to the Santa Ana Municipal Code while remaining well below the proposed CNEL 65 significance threshold. For example, the nighttime noise limit in the Municipal Code for continuous noise — such as air- conditioning — is 50 dBA (SAMC Section 18-312), for receivers where the ambient (nighttime) noise level is less than 50 dBA, which is likely the case for much of the Lake Dianne property. In City Council 18 — 314 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center Project, Santa Ana Review of Environmental Noise Analysis June 29, 2023 Page 3 of 6 this scenario, a continuous noise source that runs 24-hours per day and produces 53 dBA on the neighboring property would be out of compliance with the Municipal Code, but would result in a CNEL of less than 60. Increase of 5 dBA or More For noise level increases of 5 dBA or more, two different significance thresholds are presented on page 4.9-1 of the MEMU EIR. One states simply that noise level increases of 5 dBA or more should be considered significant, while the other states that noise level increases of 5 dBA or more should only be considered significant if the resulting CNEL is 65 or higher. We agree that a noise increase of 5 dBA or more caused by the Cabrillo Town Center project should be considered significant. We do not agree than a 5 dBA noise level increase is only significant if it also results in a CNEL of 65 or higher. CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACTS In the description of Impact 4.9-1 on page 4.9-15, the MEMU EIR states that the impact of noise due to construction in the overlay zone could be substantial, even with mitigation, but that these impacts should be considered less -than -significant because the noise of construction is temporary and exempt from the noise limits in the Santa Ana Municipal Code (construction is one of the exemptions listed in SAMC Section 18-314). We agree that construction is temporary (even if a large project such as Cabrillo Town Center would take years to build) and acknowledge the construction noise exemption in the Municipal Code. Nonetheless, the characterization of construction noise impacts as less than significant is inconsistent with the CEQA Guidelines as they are stated elsewhere in the MEMU EIR. According to the fourth bullet point on page 4.9-14, implementation of the project may result in a significant adverse impact on noise if the project would: - Cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. CONSTRUCTION NOISE MITIGATION • On pages 4.9-17 and -18, the MEMU EIR provides a list of noise and vibration mitigation measures prescribed for construction activities within the overlay zone. Beyond reiteration of the construction hours restrictions in the Santa Ana Municipal Code (no construction after 8PM or before 7AM Monday — Saturday, no construction on Sundays or Federal holidays), these mitigations are often general/vague in nature and would likely be difficult or impossible to enforce in practice. • For example, MM-OZ 4.9-2 includes requirements to: "Place noise -generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses, where feasible - Schedule high noise -producing activities between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to minimize disruption on sensitive uses - Implement noise attenuation measures, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources" Use of the phrase "where feasible" provides a workaround, allowing the construction crew to locate equipment and stage materials as close as they see fit to sensitive neighbors. Similarly, there is no City Council 18 — 315 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center Project, Santa Ana Review of Environmental Noise Analysis June 29, 2023 Page 4 of 6 definition of the "high noise -producing activities," which should cease at SPM, or the amount of reduction required to be achieved by noise barriers/blankets around equipment. OPERATIONAL IMPACTS HVAC Eauioment Noise The MEMU EIR includes an analysis of HVAC noise associated with new developments in the overlay zone, starting on page 4.9-19. The calculation starts with the assumption that HVAC systems "can result in noise levels that average between 50 and 65 dBA, Leq at 50 feet from the equipment', then reasons that shielding around rooftop equipment might typically be expected to provide 15 dBA of noise reduction, resulting in a net noise level at 50-feet of 50 dBA. For equipment that runs 24- hours per day, the preparers point out that the relationship between the Leq noise level and the CNEL is 6.7 dBA, so that an Leq of 50 dBA at 50-feet would equate to a CNEL of 57. And since 57 CNEL falls below the proposed 65 CNEL significance threshold, the EIR concludes that HVAC noise is less than significant. • We see two problems with this calculation and less -than -significant conclusion: - Firstly, the estimate of HVAC unit noise seems too low for a mixed -use project that will likely have hundreds of HVAC units operating simultaneously. This is because the combined effect of multiple similar noise sources grouped together is calculated from the equation: Total Noise Level = Noise Level for Single Source x 10*LOG10 (Number of Sources) So, while we would expect that a single AC unit, serving a single apartment could produce a noise level of approximately 55 dBA at 50-feet, a grouping of 100 units (for example serving one section of the building) would have a total noise level of 55 + 10*LOG10 (100) = 75 dBA at 50- feet. Larger, commercial -grade equipment associated with the commercial and office portions of the project as well as ventilation fans for the parking structure (if required) would likely produce more noise than residential AC units, further adding to the noise sum for surrounding receivers. It is therefore likely that the analysis in the MEMU EIR substantially underestimates the total HVAC noise impact of the project. The second problem with the HVAC noise analysis in the MEMU EIR is that (like the proposed thresholds of significance) it overlooks the noise limits in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The SAMC requires that noise from continuous sources — such as HVAC equipment — be limited to 50 dBA at night, unless the ambient noise level on the receiving property is greater than 50 dBA, in which case the ambient noise level becomes the noise limit. We expect that nighttime ambient noise levels on much of the Lake Dianne property are less than 50 dBA, so that the allowable limit for the combined noise of all HVAC equipment associated with the project is 50 dBA, not CNEL 65 as the MEMU EIR suggests. • For these reasons, we believe that the analysis presented in the MEMU EIR does not adequately demonstrate that HVAC noise associated with the Cabrillo Town Center project will be less than significant. Outdoor Amenities The Cabrillo Town Center project would include a significant amount of active and passive open space and outdoor amenities, including a 7,500 square -foot roof terrace, which would accommodate uses such as outdoor dining, game terrace, and view deck. City Council 18 — 316 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center Project, Santa Ana Review of Environmental Noise Analysis June 29, 2023 Page 5 of 6 • According to the Planning Commission staff report, the roof terrace would be equipped with synthetic turf (possibly for sports) a media wall and festival lighting, suggesting nighttime use. The analysis in Section 4.9 of the MEMU EIR does not consider the potential for operational noise impacts associated with the type of outdoor amenities proposed for the project and does not, therefore, demonstrate that any such impact is less than significant. SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS We find that the MEMU EIR/SEIR does not adequately describe the environmental noise setting, nor does it properly evaluate the noise impacts of the Cabrillo Town Center project. In addition, the noise mitigation measures included in the MEMU EIR need to be revised and supplemented to better address project impacts. We therefore recommend that the MEMU EIR/SEIR be supplemented with revised/additional project -specific environmental noise analysis and documentation as follows: Sensitive Receivers & Baseline Ambient Noise Levels Recognize the residential uses within the Lake Dianne Apartments complex — which are the closest sensitive receivers to the project site — and include this area in the noise impact analysis and baseline ambient noise measurements. Conduct 24-hour baseline noise measurements at locations selected to represent baseline ambient noise conditions at all sensitive receivers around the project site. The baseline noise survey should not be limited to locations on busy streets and should accurately reflect conditions at sensitive uses (such as those in the southwest quadrant of the Lake Dianne Apartments property) that are set back and/or shielded from traffic noise sources. Continuous noise monitoring is preferred. However, if continuous monitoring is not feasible at any of the receiver locations, then — at a minimum —the baseline should be established by means of 15- minute readings at each of the following three timeframes: 9AM — 5PM (daytime), 8PM — 10PM (evening) and 1AM — 3AM (nighttime). Thresholds of Significance • Revise the thresholds of significance in the MEMU EIR to include temporary impacts and for consistency with the noise limits in the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, as follows: Any temporary or permanent noise impact resulting from the project shall be considered significant if either one of the following conditions apply: (1) The project results in noise levels in excess of standards established in the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code or General Plan. (2) The project results in a noise level increase of 5 deA or more. Construction Noise Impacts & Mitigation • Provide a project -specific list of the types of equipment to be used during the various phases of demolition and construction. For each phase and equipment type, identify source noise levels (FHWA reference values) as well as the number of pieces to be employed in that phase. • If the project will deliberately exclude any particularly noisy construction equipment/activities (such as pile -driving) then the project documentation must include a clear statement to this effect. • Revise the construction noise analysis to reflect the total impact of all proposed equipment operating together, rather than a single piece of equipment operating in isolation. City Council 18 — 317 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center Project, Santa Ana Review of Environmental Noise Analysis June 29, 2023 Page 6 of 6 Revise/strengthen mitigation measure MM-OZ 4.9-2, so that bullet points 3 through 6 read as follows: - Place noise -generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses. - Restrict any activities that result in noise levels in excess of the Thresholds of Significance to the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM to minimize disruption of sensitive uses. - Implement noise barriers or noise blankets around construction equipment to achieve a minimum noise level reduction of 15 deA. - Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment. Operational Noise Impacts & Mitigation • Revise the operational noise impact analysis to reflect the combined all of the equipment in the project HVAC system. • Include an evaluation of project design features that would be incorporated into the building design to attenuate HVAC noise — such as equipment screens, duct silencers, etc. • The revised analysis must adequately demonstrate that HVAC noise from the project will be controlled to the point where it: (a) complies with the noise standards in the SAMC, and (b) limits noise level increases at surrounding sensitive uses to less than 5 dBA. • Include the outdoor amenities in the operational noise impact analysis. The analysis should include realistic evaluation of crowd noise, sports/games, amplified sound, AV systems, etc. and should recognize the more stringent standards in the SAMC that apply to impact noise (balls bouncing) speech and music. • Supplement the operational noise mitigation measures as necessary to address noise from outdoor amenities. Mitigation measures may include: limiting hours of use and/or occupancy of outdoor areas, additional noise shielding/screening features in the project design, limiting playback levels for outdoor amplified sound systems, etc. Yours sincerely, Steve Rogers Acoustics, LLC St Ro ers Prince I d:\tsai\cabrillo town center\report 1 City Council 18 — 318 10/3/2023 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DENYING APPEAL APPLICATION NOS. 2023-02 AND 2023-03 AND UPHOLDING THE DETERMINATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN REVIEW (SPR) NO. 2023-01 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 2023-03 (COUNTY MAP NO. 19243) TO FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS CABRILLO TOWN CENTER AT 1901 AND 1971 EAST FOURTH STREET AND 515 AND 525 NORTH CABRILLO PARK DRIVE, COLLECTIVELY 1901 EAST FOURTH STREET (APNS: 400-051-02; 400-051- 09; 400-051-14; AND 400-051-15). BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On April 24, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing to consider Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 2023-01 and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 2023-03 (County Map No. 19243) to facilitate the construction of a mixed -use development known as Cabrillo Town Center (Project) at 1901 and 1971 East Fourth Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive (collectively, 1901 East Fourth Street). After receiving public testimony on the item, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (6-0-0-1 with Ramos absent) to adopt a resolution approving SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03, with modified conditions of approval. Specifically, the Planning Commission modified the conditions of approval to require the applicant, Fairfield Realty, LLC. (Applicant), on behalf of David A. Colton, trustee of David A. Colton Trust (Property Owner) to coordinate with the Public Works Agency to develop a traffic -calming strategy when the project reaches 70-percent and 95-percent occupancy, and requires the applicant to implement such strategy when feasible and appropriate as determined by the City. B. On May 1, 2023, Lozeau Drury, LLP, on behalf of the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), submitted an appeal application (Appeal No. 2023-02) pursuant to Section 41-645 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) requesting that the City Council reconsider the Planning Commission's decision because the Project was in "violation" Resolution No. 2023-xx f 24 City Council 18 — 319 10/ 23 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Specifically, SAFER states that: (1) The decision of the Planning Commission was in "violation" of CEQA; (2) The City's determination that the Project was analyzed in the 2010 Metro East Mixed Used (MEMU) Overlay Zone EIR and Subsequent EIR was incorrect; (3) The Project would have new and different significant environmental impacts that were not analyzed in the MEMU EIR; and (4) That a project -specific EIR should have been prepared to analyze the Project. C. On May 3, 2023, Mitchell M. Tsai, on behalf of the Southwest Mountains States Carpenters (SWMSRCC), also submitted an appeal application (Appeal No. 2023-03) pursuant to Section 41-645 of the SAMC requesting that the City Council reconsider the Planning Commission's decision based on the following reasons: I. Requirement of a Local Workforce. Specifically, the appellant states that, "The city should require the use of a local workforce to benefit the community's economic development and environment." II. Training Requirements To Prevent Community Spread Of Covid-19 And Other Infectious Diseases. Specifically, the appellants states that, "The City should impose training requirements for the Project's construction activities to prevent community spread of Covid-19 and other infectious diseases." III. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance. Specifically, the appellant contends the following: a. That CEQA mandates preparation of an EIR for projects so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed; b. That there are new transportation impact methodology requirements, not analyzed in the Certified EIR; c. That the Project requires new feasible mitigation measures to mitigate greenhouse gas impacts; and d. That the Project may have significant land use impacts which were not analyzed in the Certified EIR. IV. Inconsistency with the General Plan. Specifically, the appellant contends that the Project is inconsistent with the General Plan because there are no onsite affordable units. D. On August 17, 2023, Mitchell M. Tsai, on behalf of the SWMSRCC, submitted a supplemental appeal letter, outside of the 10-day appeal period, as outlined in Section 41-645(b) of the SAMC. Nonetheless, staff provides a comprehensive response below on all appeal items received. The subsequent letter reiterates certain points outlined in the appeal letter dated May 3, 2023. However, SWMSRCC makes several new points in their request that the City Council reconsider the Planning Commission's decision, including the following reasons: Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 320 10/ f 24 Infeasible Transportation Mitigation Requirements in the Certified EIR. Specifically, the appellant contends that the City's Transportation Mitigation Requirement is infeasible for the Project. II. Adequate Analyzes Of Noise Impacts. Specifically, the appellant contends that the Certified EIR fails to adequately analyze the Project's noise impacts, including the following: a. That the Certified EIR fails to identify all nearby sensitive receptors; b. That the Certified EIR fails to adequately characterize ambient noise conditions; c. That the Certified EIR's significance threshold is inadequate; d. That the Certified EIR's construction noise analysis and mitigation measures must be revised; and e. That the Certified EIR's operation noise analysis underestimates the Project's impacts E. On October 3, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Appeal Application No. 2023-02 (SAFER). The Appellant does not provide any substantial evidence that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Moreover, the appellant does not provide information as to why they believe a project -specific EIR should have been prepared, or what new and different significant environmental impacts would result from the Project that have not already been analyzed in the EIR and Subsequent EIR. Nevertheless, a comprehensive response on the appeal items previously outlined has been prepared: Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Sections 15162 and 15168 of the CEQA guidelines, staff deemed that the Project is within the scope of the 2007 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone Environmental Impact Report (EIR), hereinafter referred to as "Certified EIR." Per Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 (a), when an EIR has been certified, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole records, one or more of the following: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 321 10/ 3 f 24 effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or D. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) sets forth criteria to use a program EIR for "later activities." Specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) states the following: Section 15168(c) — Use with Later Activities. Later activities in the program must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. 1. If a later activity would have effects that were not examined in the program EIR, a new Initial Study would need to be prepared leading to either an EIR or a Negative Declaration. That later analysis may tier from the program EIR a provided in Section 15152. 2. If the agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR, and no new environmental document would be required. Whether a later activity is within the scope of a program EIR is a factual question that the lead Resolution No. 2023-xx f 24 City Council 18 — 322 10/ 23 agency determines based on substantial evidence in the record. Factors that an agency may consider in making that determination include, but are not limited to, consistency of the later activity with the type of allowable land use, overall planned density and building intensity, geographic area analyzed for environmental impacts, and covered infrastructure, as described in the program EIR. 3. An agency shall incorporate feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed in the program EIR into later activities in the program. 4. Where the later activities involve site -specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the operation were within the scope of the program EIR. Based on staff's analysis, the Certified EIR meets the definition under Guidelines Section 15168(a) because the Certified EIR analyzed the potential impacts associated with the MEMU Overlay Zone, which is a generally applicable plan containing rules, regulations and other general criteria governing a specified geographically contained area. The Certified EIR fully analyzed the potential environmental effects associated with the City's adoption of the MEMU and subsequent foreseeable development within the MEMU. As discussed below, the Project is fully consistent with the MEMU Overlay Zone and within the scope of the Certified EIR. The Project Site is located in the Village Center District of the MEMU. Uses allowed in the Village Center District include a mix of commercial, office, and residential in mid -rise buildings of between 4 and 10 stories in a setting that provides open spaces, niches, and areas for gatherings and activities along streets, paseos, and interconnecting walkways that link the Village Center to adjacent districts and nearby public parks north of the Village Center District. The Project conforms to this description by including development of the Project Site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units (including apartments, live/work units, and townhomes), approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space in accordance with the Development Standards outlined in Table 1 in the Project Description of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. As described in the Project Description section of this staff report, the Project Site would be separated into two distinct areas by a roadway (Parkcourt Place), which would traverse the site east/west. The northern portion of the Project Site would be developed with 58 townhomes and the Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 323 10/ 3 f 24 southern portion would be developed with a five -story mixed -use building with 449 apartment units and 26,800 square feet of ground -floor commercial uses, which could include retail, office, and shopkeeper, surrounded by a central open space area and a pedestrian infrastructure to connect the Project to adjacent land uses. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the allowable development under the MEMU. Finally, all applicable mitigation measures from the Certified EIR would be implemented by the Project, and each of the applicable mitigation measures would also be made conditions of approval for the Project. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe significant impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance that has become available that would result in new or more severe significant impacts. Moreover, no subsequent EIR would be required for the Project. Based on the analysis herein and the Certified EIR and the whole of the record, under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, the Certified EIR adequately described the Project activity for purposes of CEQA. F. On October 3, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Appeal Application No. 2023-03 (SWMSRCC) and found that: I. Requirement of a Local Workforce In April 2022, the City of Santa Ana City Council adopted an ordinance repealing and reenacting the City's inclusionary opportunity ordinance. The City's Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO) became effective in May of 2022. The Ordinance provides provisions for local skilled and trained workforce requirements. Specifically, Section 41-1904 (c) of the SAMC, states that the use of a local skilled and trained workforce shall be phased in over time and shall only apply to a development project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units opting to exercise the in -lieu fee payment option. Section 41-1904 further states that between November 16, 2021 and December 31, 2025, a project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units exercising the option to pay the 15- dollars per square foot in -lieu fee amount shall not be required to utilize a local skilled and trained workforce for completing the construction of the project. As previously outlined in this report, the applicant has selected the option to satisfy the AHOCO by paying in -lieu fees in the amount of 15 dollars per square foot. Based on available figures for the project, the project will contribute an estimated $8,043,600 in in -lieu fees, which must be spent on production of affordable housing in the City of Santa Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 324 10/ 3 f 24 Ana (see Table 3 for the calculation methodology). Therefore, the applicant is in compliance with the AHOCO and is not required to provide local skilled and trained workforce. Lastly, the provision of community benefits is not a requirement of CEQA. Further, the Project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures of the Certified EIR. Mitigation measures beyond those required by the Certified EIR are not required unless the Project would result in new or more severe impacts compared to those analyzed in the Certified EIR. The Project's CEQA Findings demonstrate that the Project is consistent with the MEMU and within the scope of the analysis provided in the Certified EIR. II. Training Requirements to Prevent Community Spread Of Covid-19 and Other Infectious Diseases The Applicant's request for the Planning Commission to mandate additional public health training is outside of the Planning Commission's purview and outside of their land use powers and duties, as outlined in Section 2-350.2 of the SAMC. Moreover, the request is well outside the scope of CEQA. The Project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures of the Certified EIR. Mitigation measures beyond those required by the Certified EIR are not required unless the Project would result in new or more severe impacts compared to those analyzed in the Certified EIR. The Project's CEQA Findings demonstrate that the Project is consistent with the MEMU and within the scope of the analysis provided in the Certified EIR. III. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance a. The appellant contends that CEQA mandates preparation of an EIR for projects so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed. Staff provides an analysis for why no subsequent EIR would be required, under the SAFER appeal analysis. To summarize, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe significant impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance that has become available that would result in new or more severe significant impacts. Moreover, no subsequent EIR would be required for the Project. Based on the analysis herein and the Certified EIR and the whole of the record, under CEQA Guidelines Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 325 10/ 3 f 24 Section 15168, the Certified EIR adequately described the Project activity for purposes of CEQA. b. The appellant contends that there are new transportation impact methodology requirements, not analyzed in the Certified EIR. The Project CEQA Findings demonstrate that the Project's potential transportation impacts are within the scope of the analysis of the Certified EIR, including Exhibit 9G (Project LOS Analysis) and Exhibit 9H (Project VMT Information) as part of the Project staff report. As discussed therein, since adoption of the Certified EIR, the LOS metric for analyzing transportation and traffic impacts under CEQA has been replaced with analysis of VMT to address consistency with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). However, recent California case law confirms that CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) only applies prospectively to CEQA documents that have not yet been circulated for public review and not to CEQA documents that rely on previously certified EIRs that complied with applicable CEQA requirements when publicly reviewed. The court in Olen Properties Corporation v. City of Newport Beach (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 270 explicitly recognizes that VMT impacts were known of and understood in 2006 when the EIR in that case was certified (the same year as the original Certified EIR for the MEMU) and therefore do not constitute new information that would trigger recirculation. Thus, a project relying on a previously certified EIR under CEQA Guidelines 15168(c) is not required to provide a VMT analysis if: (1) the previously certified EIR evaluated transportation impacts based on LOS and (2) the subsequent project is within the scope of the impacts assessed in the previously certified EIR and any applicable mitigation measures are adopted. The Certified 2006 EIR was certified well before CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) was adopted and relies on an LOS analysis, not a VMT analysis, to analyze the MEMU's transportation impacts. However, impacts associated with VMT were known of and understood at the time the Certified EIR was certified and therefore do not constitute new information. Moreover, the CEQA findings associated with the Project will not be circulated for public review. Therefore, no VMT analysis is required to evaluate the Project's consistency with the Certified EIR and the City is evaluating such consistency based only on LOS. Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 326 10/ 3 f 24 Nevertheless, a VMT Screening Assessment Memorandum ("Memo") has been produced for the Project for informational purposes only, in response to this comment. The Memo presents the VMT screening criteria, analysis methodology and the conclusion. The approach and methodology outlined in this Memo was consistent with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 20199, which states that several types of projects can be screened out from a VMT assessment using identified criteria, indicating that these projects have the potential to reduce VMT per service population and result in a less -than - significant transportation impacts. Moreover, this Memo was thoroughly peer reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer, who concluded that the VMT memo prepared for the Project shows the project is screened out from any full VMT analysis. Further, the Traffic Engineer confirmed that the Memo shows that the project is within a HQTA, and it is consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS. Specifically, the Memo determines that the Project would not result in VMT impacts because it is located within a HQTA, where existing transit service provided by OCTA provides service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during the peak commute hours, and because the proposed land use was consistent with the RTP/SCS as contained in SCAG's adopted Connect SoCal (2020-2045 RTP/SCS). Therefore, in accordance with the City of Santa Ana's guidelines, the proposed Project was deemed to be exempt from the preparation of any further VMT analysis and may be presumed to have a less than significant CEQA-related transportation impact. c. The appellant contends that the Project requires new feasible mitigation measures to mitigate greenhouse gas impacts. The topic of GHG emissions impacts was not included in the CEQA Guidelines in place at the time the 2006 EIR was certified, and as such, was not included in the Certified EIR's analysis of the MEMU's potential impacts. However, both the existence of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel combustion and other activities were known at the time the Certified EIR was approved. Since the approval of the Certified EIR, federal and state laws and regulations have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions, and the topic of GHG is included in the current version of the CEQA Guidelines. A detailed analysis of the Project's GHG Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 327 10/ 3 f 24 emissions impacts is included in Exhibits 9 and 9D of the Project staff report. As summarized, the Project would not result in any significant impacts related to GHG emissions. Moreover, statutory/regulatory requirements do not need to be repeated as mitigation measures for the Project. The Project would be subject to all applicable solar photovoltaic (PV) and EV parking requirements (i.e., statutory requirements) as outlined in the current 2022 California Green Building Code. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a) assists lead agencies in determining the significance of the impacts of GHG emissions, giving them discretion to determine whether to assess impacts quantitatively or qualitatively. The City, Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Office of Planning and Research (OPR), CARB, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), and other applicable agencies have not adopted a numerical threshold of significance for assessing impacts related to GHG emissions. As a result, the methodology for evaluating a project's impacts related to GHG emissions focuses on its consistency with statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions. Exhibit 9 describes the extent to which the Project is consistent with or exceeds the performance -based standards included in the regulations outlined in the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's CAP. Given the Project's substantial consistency with state, SCAG, and City GHG emissions reduction goals and objectives, the Project is consistent with applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG emissions. In the absence of adopted standards and established significance thresholds, and given this consistency, it is concluded that the Project's incremental contribution to GHG emissions and their effects on climate change would not be cumulatively considerable. Further, GHG emissions -related impacts have long been known and understood at the time the Certified EIR was certified, and therefore, does not constitute new information for the purposes of this analysis. d. The appellant contends that the Project may have significant land use impacts which were not analyzed in the Certified EIR. Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 328 10/ 0 3 f 24 As part of the Project, the applicant is requesting approval of a TTM (County Map No. 19243) to consolidate four existing lots, and create two new legal lots (Parcel 1 and 2), one of which will be subdivided for condominium purposes for the townhome portion of the site. Parcel 1 will include 14,900 square feet of live/work space (19 live/work units) and 449 residential rental units. Parcel 2 will consist of eight 3-story townhome buildings containing a total of 58 residential for sale units. Upon completion of the subdivision, the lots will continue to be utilized for residential use in the form of attached tuck -under unit type structures (townhouse development), and commercial/residential mixed -use (wrap building), consistent with the objectives uses analyzed in the Certified EIR. Pursuant to Section 3.2 (Project Objectives) of the Certified EIR, implementation of the MEMU was intended fulfill the following objectives: • Create an active, mixed -use urban village where it is possible to live, work, shop and play all within a short walk of each other. • Facilitate well -designed new mixed -use development projects that combine residential and nonresidential uses through innovative and flexible design solutions. • Achieve the harmonious integration of new mixed -use development within the existing fabric of the mid -rise and high-rise office environment. • Provide for a mix of housing in order to encourage a continuum of living and a variety of household types. • Allow for the development of varied residential types in a mixed -use configuration including, but not limited to, loft -style units, live/work units, attached row houses, and high -quality stacked flats Moreover, Section 3.3 (Project Description) of the Certified EIR outlines the primary elements in the MEMU, including: • A potential increase in City population of 11,102 residents • A potential increase in the number of available residences within City limits by 5,551 units • The potential development of 1,275,440 gross square feet (gsf) of commercial (retail and service) space, as well as 3,410,507 gsf of office space. This corresponds to a potential net increase of Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 329 10/ 0 3 f 24 approximately 963,000 sf of commercial space and 690,000 sf of office space beyond existing conditions. As proposed, the TTM is required for the feasibility of the Project in order to provide for the intended mix of uses as envisioned by the City, in accordance with the MEMU and Certified EIR. Pursuant to the California Building Code requirements, no building or structure can be built over legal property lines to ensure compliance with fire and safety separation requirements. Therefore, approval of the TTM is required in order for the applicant to provide the proposed mixed -use development project. Moreover, the TTM does not allow for the creation off additional units beyond what was previously analyzed in the Certified EIR. The units that would be created under the TTM would be consistent with the Certified EIR objectives, and would allow for multi -family residential townhouses (Parcel 2) and mixed commercial and residential uses (Parcel 1). Based on the above analysis, the Project would be fully consistent with the allowable development under the MEMU and within the scope of the Certified EIR. In addition, all applicable mitigation measures from the Certified EIR would be implemented by the Project, and each of the applicable mitigation measures would also be made conditions of approval for the Project. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe significant impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance that has become available that would result in new or more severe significant impacts. Moreover, no subsequent EIR would be required for the Project. Based on the analysis herein and the Certified EIR and the whole of the record, under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, the Certified EIR adequately described the Project activity for purposes of CEQA. IV. Inconsistencv with the General Plan The Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO) was adopted in 2011, then known as the Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO), and amended in 2015, 2020, and most recently in May of 2022. The ordinance was adopted to implement the City's General Plan Housing Element Goal of providing affordable housing within the City. Since inception, the Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 330 10/ 0 f 24 Inclusionary Housing Fund has generated $28.2 million that has been used to develop new affordable housing, provide emergency shelter, and create homeownership opportunities. A total of 107 affordable housing units have been created, and an additional 86 units have been committed through such fees. The AHOCO outlines various on -site affordable requirements for eligible ownership and rental projects. However, provisions allow for the payment of in -lieu fees rather than building the affordable housing units on -site. The Project would be a market -rate residential development with no units dedicated to affordable housing for lower -income residents. However, the Project would be required to pay an inclusionary housing in -lieu fee, consistent with the City's AHOCO, to further the production of affordable housing units and development within the City. As previously outlined, the Project will contribute an estimated $8,043,600 in in -lieu fees, which must be spent on production of affordable housing in the City of Santa Ana. Moreover, the Project would not remove any housing or affordable housing units. Rather, it would increase the housing stock of market -rate and affordable housing units through payment of an in - lieu fee. The Project would result in a net increase of 507 total units which consists of wide range of housing types, including apartment units at different bedroom counts and townhome style units, consistent with the City's General Plan goals and policies. Therefore, the Project is in compliance with the AHOCO and the City's General Plan Land Use and Housing Element. General Plan Consistency The City's AHOCO, and specifically the in -lieu provisions, are consistent with various goals in policies in the City's General Plan Housing Element (HE), including Goal 2 and 3, and policies HE-2.7, HE-3.1, and HE-3.2, outlined below: Goal 2 — Foster an inclusive community with a diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups. • Policy HE-2.7 Affordable Component. Pursuant to the Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO), require eligible rental and ownership housing projects to include at least 15 percent of the rental housing units as affordable for Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 331 10/ 0 3 f 24 low-income households; or 10 percent of the rental units affordable to very low-income households; or 5 percent of rental units affordable to lower income households (5 percent to low-income, 3 percent to very low-income, and 2 percent to extremely low-income households); or at least 5 percent of the units ineligible ownership projects affordable to moderate -income households. Implement various strategies using the in -lieu fees generated by AHOCO to provide a wide array of affordable housing options. Goal 3 — Increase opportunities for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income individuals and families to find affordable housing, and afford a greater choice of rental and homeownership opportunities. • Policy HE-3.1 Rental Assistance. Provide rental assistance for individuals and families with extremely low-, very low-, and low -incomes with funding from the federal government. • Policy HE-3.2 Homeownership. Expand homeownership opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents and workers in Santa Ana through the provision of financial assistance, education, and collaborative partnerships. Lastly, the in -lieu provisions, are consistent with the Item No. 25 in the City's the Housing Implementation Strategy, within the Housing Element, which outlines the following objective: Item No. 25 — Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO) Collect and leverage in -lieu fees with other sources to support the production and/or rehabilitation of affordable housing for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income families with a goal of funding eight projects for the planning period. Inclusionary Housing Fund Funding for this program is provided using revenues generated through in -lieu fees from the AHOCO. Funds can be used to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to moderate income (120 percent AMI), low- (80 percent AMI), very low- (50 percent AMI) and extremely low-income (30 percent AMI) Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 332 10/ 0 3 f 24 households in the City. Funds can be used to make loans to eligible borrowers to provide affordable housing. Funds are also being used to provide down payment assistance for first time home buyers. The City has used its inclusionary revenues to fund the development of many of its more recent affordable apartment properties. Inclusionary housing requirements cannot be confiscatory or deprive an owner of a fair and reasonable return. California Gov't Code § 65583(a) requires assessments of the potential and actual constraints on the development of housing. Within that context, it is important for affordable housing programs to be set up to balance the interests of property owners and developers against the public benefit created by the production of affordable housing units. As such, the in -lieu fees above are based on an evaluation of the affordable housing requirements that could be supported from an economic perspective. The results of this analysis were translated into order -of -magnitude estimates of the in -lieu fee amounts that could be charged on a financially feasible basis. G. Moreover, on October 3, 2023, the City Council found that the supplemental comment letter dated August 17, 2023, from Mitchell M. Tsai, on behalf of the SWMSRCC, was received outside of the 10-day appeal period, pursuant to Section 41-645(b) of the SAMC. Therefore, the subsequent appeal items do not satisfy the requirements of SAMC Section 41-645 and should not be considered. Nonetheless, staff has prepared a comprehensive response below on all appeal items received. I. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance a. The appellant contends that the City's Transportation Mitigation Requirement is infeasible for the Project As previously discussed, the Project would not result in any significant LOS impacts, which is the metric utilized in the Certified EIR. Further, the VMT Screening Memo for the Project CEQA Findings, demonstrates, for informational purposes only (and not as a legal requirement), that the Project would not result in significant VMT impacts. Therefore, no VMT-related mitigation measures are required. b. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR fails to adequately analyze the Project's noise impacts. Specifically, the appellant contends that the Certified EIR fails to identify all nearby sensitive receptors. Resolution No. 2023-xx 24 City Council 18 — 333 10/ 0 3 f The Certified EIR analyzed potential noise impacts at 15 sensitive receptors. While the nearest sensitive uses vary at different locations in and around the MEMU, and as specific development plans had not yet been determined at individual sites at the time the Certified EIR was prepared, it was assumed that sensitive receptors could be as close as 50 feet from where construction would take place. The comment alleges that impacts to the Lake Dianne Apartments were not analyzed. However, the Lake Dianne Apartments are located 80 feet away from the Project Site, greater than the 50 feet assumed as the nearest sensitive receptor by the Certified EIR. Thus, the potential impacts to the Lake Dianne Apartments are within the scope of those analyzed by the Certified EIR. In June 2023, DKA Planning, an expert noise consulting firm, took short-term noise measurements near the Project site to determine the current ambient noise conditions near the four nearest sensitive receptors: Cabrillo Park, 2001 E. 4th Street, the southeast corner of 4th Street and Cabrillo Park Drive, and 618 Sherry Lane. The residence at 724 N. Parkcenter within the Lake Dianne Apartments is assumed to have the same ambient noise conditions as Cabrillo Park given its immediate proximity to Cabrillo Park and similarity in surrounding uses. For reference, Exhibit 9F (Noise Technical Report), as part of the Project staff report, outlines the Project CEQA Findings. Regarding construction, the Project would comply with SAMC Section 18-314 and construction activities would be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Monday through Saturday, and would be prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. Exhibit 9F demonstrates that construction of the Project would not increase ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by more than 5 A -weighted decibels (dBA), and thus would not result significant noise impacts, including to the closest residence of the Lake Dianne Apartments. Furthermore, Exhibit 9F demonstrates that Project operation, including noise associated with mechanical and landscaping equipment, vehicles, outdoor and recreational uses, and trash and recycling services, would not increase ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by more than 5 dBA, and thus would not result in significant noise impacts, including to the closest residence of the Lake Dianne Apartments. Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 334 10/ 0 3 f 24 Further, the Project would also implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-1 through MM-OZ 4.9-7 of the Certified EIR to protect residential receptors and to minimize construction and operational noise and vibration levels. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to substantial temporary or permanent increase in noise and vibration beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. c. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR fails to adequately characterize ambient noise conditions. First, this comment essentially challenges the adequacy of the Certified EIR analysis by making allegations about how the ambient noise measurements were taken. However, any challenge to the Certified EIR is untimely. The Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk and posted on March 23, 2007, and the statute of limitations closed in April 2007, and any challenge to the Certified EIR must have been filed before then. Second, this comment does not present any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Nonetheless, in June 2023, DKA Planning took short-term noise measurements near the Project site to determine the current ambient noise conditions near the four nearest sensitive receptors: Cabrillo Park, 2001 E. 4th Street, the southeast corner of 4th Street and Cabrillo Park Drive, and 618 Sherry Lane. The residence at 724 N. Parkcenter within the Lake Dianne Apartments is assumed to have the same ambient noise conditions as Cabrillo Park given its immediate proximity to Cabrillo Park and similarity in surrounding uses. Noise measurements were taken on a weekday afternoon using a Quest Technologies Sound Examiner SE-400 Meter that complies with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) for general environmental measurement instrumentation. In the absence of a protocol for establishing ambient noise levels for construction analyses, 15-minute measurements were used to characterize typical noise levels during hours when construction is likely to occur. No construction will occur at night. As the major source of ambient noise in the area (traffic) was stable, 15-minute durations were deemed to be sufficient to characterize ambient noise levels. Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 335 10/ 0 3 f 24 d. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR's significance threshold is inadequate. First, this comment essentially challenges the adequacy of the Certified EIR analysis by making allegations about the significance thresholds used. However, any challenge to the Certified EIR is untimely. The Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk and posted on March 23, 2007 and the statute of limitations closed in April 2007, and any challenge to the Certified EIR must have been filed before then. Second, this comment does not present any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Nonetheless, Exhibit 9F, as part of the Project staff report, analyzes both the Project's noise impacts, both construction and operation. The analysis utilizes the same significance threshold as the Certified EIR, a 5 dBA over ambient threshold for construction impacts and a 5 dBA over ambient threshold for operational impacts. Regarding construction, the Project would comply with SAMC Section 18-314 and construction activities would be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Monday through Saturday, and would be prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. Exhibit 9F demonstrates that construction of the Project would not increase ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by more than 5 dBA, and thus would not result significant noise impacts, including to the closest residence of the Lake Dianne Apartments. Regarding operation, Exhibit 9F demonstrates that Project operation, including noise associated with mechanical and landscaping equipment, vehicles, outdoor and recreational uses, and trash and recycling services, would not increase ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by more than 5 dBA, and thus would not result in significant noise impacts, including to the closest residence of the Lake Dianne Apartments. Additionally, the Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-1 through MM- OZ 4.9-7 of the Certified EIR to protect residential receptors and to minimize construction and operational noise and vibration levels. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to substantial Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 336 10i 0 TT, 24 temporary or permanent increase in noise and vibration beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. e. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR's construction noise analysis and mitigation measures must be revised. First, this comment essentially challenges the adequacy of the Certified EIR analysis by making allegations about the significance conclusions and mitigation measures. However, any challenge to the Certified EIR is untimely. The Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk and posted on March 23, 2007 and the statute of limitations closed in April 2007, and any challenge to the Certified EIR must have been filed before then. Second, this comment does not present any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Further, the Project's ability to implement the Certified EIR mitigation measures demonstrates that the measures are not vague and impossible to enforce. In fact the mitigation measures cited by this comment are standard best management practices that are regularly implemented in development projects and will be adopted as mandatory project conditions of approval. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to substantial temporary or permanent increase in noise and vibration beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. f. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR's operation noise analysis underestimates the Project's impacts. This comment essentially challenges the adequacy of the Certified EIR analysis by making allegations about the operational noise impact analysis. However, any challenge to the Certified EIR is untimely. The Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk and posted on March 23, 2007 and the statute of limitations closed in April 2007, and any challenge to the Certified EIR must have been filed before then. Further, this comment does not present any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. As described in Exhibit 9F, as part of the Project staff report, Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 337 10i 0 3 f 24 noise impacts from rooftop mechanical equipment on nearby sensitive receptors would be negligible. First, most modern heat pumps are relatively quiet, with sound ratings of up to 60 decibels, equivalent to normal human conversation. Second, there would be no line -of -sight from these rooftop units to the sensitive receptors. Because the sensitive uses near the Project Site are one- to three -stories in height, there would be no sound path from the mechanical equipment to receptors that would be 20 to 45 feet lower than the roof of the Project. Third, the presence of the Project's roof edge creates an effective noise barrier that further reduces noise levels from rooftop HVAC units by 8 dBA or more. A parapet would further shield sensitive receptors near the Project Site. These design elements would be helpful in managing noise. For the townhomes, outdoor mechanical equipment for heating and cooling for each residence would likely be located on the ground level of each unit. This could include a ground -mounted heat pump that would generate noise during both heating and cooling sessions while air conditioners operate during cooling cycles. This equipment would include a number of sound sources, including compressors, condenser fans, supply fans, return fans, and exhaust fans. These units could be rated to generate a sound power between 51 and 76 dBA. Any off -site sensitive receptors would not experience elevated noise levels without a direct line -of -sight to these units. Given their location near each residence, any sound path from these units would be attenuated by the presence of the townhomes and structures in the Project, as well as the distance to off -site receptors (i.e., Cabrillo Park to the north, Lake Dianne Apartments to the northeast). As a result, noise from HVAC units would negligibly elevate ambient noise levels, far less than the 5 dBA CNEL threshold of significance for operational impacts. Regarding potential impacts related to composite outdoor uses, Exhibit 9F explains that the primary use of these spaces would be for human conversation, which would produce negligible noise increases. There are no amplified noise sources proposed at the Project. Vocal intensity increases about 0.38 dB for every 1.0 dB increase in noise levels above 55 dB. For example, the sound of a human voice at 60 dB would produce a noise level of 39 dB at ten feet, which would not elevate ambient noise levels at any of the analyzed sensitive receptors by more than 0.2 dBA Leq. Moreover, noise levels from human speech would attenuate rapidly with greater distance, resulting in a 33 dB noise level at twenty feet, and 27 dB at 40 feet. Table 9 in Exhibit 9F Resolution No. 2023-xx f 24 City Council 18 — 338 10/ 3 demonstrates that Project operation, including noise associated with outdoor and recreational uses, would not increase ambient noise levels, and therefore would not result in significant noise impacts. Section 2. The City Council, after hearing, considering and weighing all evidence in the record presented on behalf of all parties and being fully informed of the application, the Planning Commission's decision, and the appeal, hereby finds and determines that the Planning Commission's decision was not made in error, that the Planning Commission's decision was not an abuse of discretion by the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission's decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record. Section 3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the Project is within the scope of the 2007 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and 2018 Subsequent EIR (SEIR) (SCH No. 2006031041). The 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR anticipated potential development of 5,551 residential units, 963,000 square feet of commercial development, and 690,000 of office development. The 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR analyzed impacts related to aesthetics, agriculture/forestry, air quality, biology, cultural resources, geology/soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population/housing, public services, transportation/traffic, tribal cultural resources and utilities. The EIR and SEIR concluded that there would be significant and unavoidable impacts associated with air quality, noise, and transportation/traffic, and mitigation measures were developed and recorded through an approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). As required by the MMRP, a traffic impact analysis was prepared for this project by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers (LLG). The analysis evaluated the existing operating conditions at 25 intersections, estimated the trip generation potential of the project, and forecasted future near -term and long-term operating conditions without the proposed project. Based on the analysis, off -site improvements are required at various intersections and at difference timeframes, as identified in the traffic analysis, which the Project will comply with. The previously prepared 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR adequately described the Project's environmental setting, significant impacts and alternatives, and mitigation measures related to each impact. There are no substantial changes with respect to circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the EIR. There is no new information of substantial importance and there are no new environmental impact or mitigation measures needed. All applicable mitigation measures applied to the previously prepared 2007 EIR and 2018 SEIR will be applied to this project. Section 4. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, Resolution No. 2023-xx f 24 City Council 18 — 339 10/ 3 equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 5. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby denies Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03, thereby upholding the Planning Commission's approval of Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 2023-01 and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 2023-03 (County Map No. 19243), with modified conditions of approval to require the applicant to coordinate with the Public Works Agency to develop a traffic -calming strategy when the project reaches 70-percent and 95-percent occupancy, and requiring the applicant to implement such strategy when feasible and appropriate as determined by the City. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for City Council Action dated October 3, 2023, and exhibits attached thereto, and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. [This space intentionally left blank] [Signatures on the following page] Resolution No. 2023-xx f 24 City Council 18 — 340 10/ ADOPTED this day of APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney IS Jose Montoya Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers 2023. Valerie Amezcua Mayor Resolution No. 2023-xx City Council 18 — 341 10f 24 / 3 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2023-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2023. Date: Clerk of the Council Resolution No. 2023-xx f 24 City Council 18 — 342 10/ 3 PARKING STUDY AND PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT Santa Ana, California December 9, 2022 Engineers & Planners Traffic Transportation Parking City Council 18 — 343 10/3/2023 December 9, 2022 Engineers & Planners Traffic Transportation Parking Grant Williams FRH Realty 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 100 Linscott, Law & Greenspan. Engineers Carlsbad, CA 92121 2ExecutiveCircle Suite 250 LLG Reference: 2.22.4531.1 Irvine, CA92614 949.825.6175 T Subject: Parking Study and Parking Management Plan for the 949.825.6173 r Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project www.Ilgengineers.com Santa Ana, California Pasadena Irvine San Diego Dear Mr. Williams: Woodland Hills As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Study and Parking Management Plan for Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Used Project (hereinafter referred to as Project) in the City of Santa Ana, California. The Cabrillo Town Center Project is a planned mixed -use residential apartment project consisting of 507 residential apartment/townhome units with up to 17,200 square -feet (SF) of retail/commercial space, plus an additional 6,100 SF of commercial floor area allocated to leasing/co-work space. The Project site is a 8.97±-acre rectangular - shaped parcel of land within the Metro East Mixed -Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone that is generally located north of Fourth Street and east of Cabrillo Park Drive in the City of Santa Ana, California This Parking Management Plan (PMP) has been prepared in response to City of Santa Ana requirements for the proposed Project to ensure adequate parking for all Project residents, tenants, employees and guests. This PMP is intended to be used to ensure that the Project's parking supply, based on parking information published in the City of Santa Ana Metro East Mixed -Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone, Chapter 4.0 Development Standards, Section 4.8 Parking and Access, (A)(2) Village Center District (Section 4.8(A)(2), will be sufficient to accommodate the Project's actual Philip M. Linscott, PEn924-zosol parking demand. In addition, per City comments, the PMP should identify how stalls Jack M. Greenspan, PE (Reo are assigned, gates are managed, method of access (keycard, access codes) for William A. Law, PE (Rel.) residents, guests, employees, and public. Further, the PMP should incorporate the Paul W. Wilkinson, PE requirements published in Section 4.8(B) (2) of the MEMU, and also the requirements John P. Keating, PE of Section 4.8(B) (4) of the MEMU. David S. Shender, PE John A. Boarman, PE Clare M. Look -Jaeger, PE Richard E. Barretto, PE l ❑. Maberry, PE City Council 18 — 344 10/3/2023 NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study ,& Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- An LG2W6 Company founded 1966 Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 2 PARKING GOALS 1. Meet or exceed City minimum requirements for total parking spaces. 2. Provide all resident and guest parking spaces onsite. 3. Provide flexible onsite parking opportunities for retail/commercial and resident parking that respect both commercial tenants and guest parking needs. 4. Enact policies that promote parking efficiencies and effective communication between Property Management, commercial tenants and project residents. 5. Enact policies of enforcement that are sufficiently flexible to meet current and changing parking demands. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND MULTIMODAL SETTING Existing Development The Project site is a 8.97±-acre rectangular -shaped parcel of land within the Metro East Mixed -Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone that is generally located north of Fourth Street and east of Cabrillo Park Drive in the City of Santa Ana, California. The Project site has an existing zoning of Professional (P) and is identified with a "Village Center District" designation in the MEW Overlay Zone. The subject property is currently developed with four (4) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 173,025 square -feet (SF) of floor area and approximately 617 surface parking spaces. The northern half of the Project site, addressed at 515 — 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, is developed with two (2) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 92,115 SF, whereas the southern half, addressed at 1907 — 1971 E. Fourth Street, is developed with two (2) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 80,910 SF. Vehicular access to the Project site is currently provided via two (2) right -turn only driveways on Fourth Street, one (1) right -turn only driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive, and a full access driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park Drive; No cross vehicular access is now provided with the adjacent commercial property to the east. See Figure 1-1, a Vicinity Map that illustrates the general location of the Project and surrounding street system. Figure 2-1 is an existing aerial photograph of the Project site. City Council 18 — 345 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 3 Proposed Project The proposed Project will include the development of up to 507 residential apartment/townhomes units with a total of 1,025 parking spaces. Site "A" is proposed as five -story apartment podium with up 449 apartment homes consisting of 23 studio units, 264 one -bedroom units, 148 two -bedroom units, and 14 two-bedroom/live- work units, and 17,200 SF of retail/commercial floor area that consists of 5,800 SF of ground floor retail space and 11,400 SF of live/work commercial/office space. On - site facilities for Site "A an additional 6,100 SF of leasing office and co -work space as well as resident amenities. Parking for Site "A" will be provided via a six -level parking structure with a total of 898 parking spaces. Of the proposed 898 spaces, 90 spaces are proposed to be allocated for resident guest and retail/commercial parking needs, with the remaining 808 spaces allocated for resident parking. In addition, although not counted as a part of the Site "A's" parking supply, an additional 23 on - street parking spaces will be provided on Park Court Place. Site "B" is proposed as residential townhome community consisting of three-story townhomes with a total of 58 units and parking supply of 127 spaces consisting of 116 resident garage spaces and 11 open surface parking for use by resident guest. On - site facilities/amenities of the Site `B includes open space/courtyards. Although not counted as a part of the Project's parking supply, an additional 23 on -street parking spaces will be provided on Park Court Place. Table 1-1 provides a summary of the proposed Project components, whereas Table 1- 2 provides a summary of the parking spaces provided within the proposed apartments parking structure, by level and type. Figure 2-2 presents the proposed Site Plan, prepared by AO Architects, dated 11/10/2022. Project's Pedestrian Connections Pedestrian circulation would be provided via existing public sidewalks along Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive which will connect to the project site. The project will protect the existing sidewalk along project frontage, and if necessary, repair or reconstruct sidewalks along the project frontage per the City's request. The existing sidewalk system within the project vicinity provides direct connectivity to the existing retail/commercial development located along major throughfares. City Council 18 — 346 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 4 Project's Proximity to Public Transit Public transit bus service is provided in the project area by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Four (4) OCTA bus routes operate within the vicinity of the project site on First Street, 4th Street, 17th Street, and Tustin Avenue, which consists of the following: ■ OCTA Route 60: The major routes of travel include 17th Street and Tustin Avenue. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on 17th Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the northwest and southwest corners. Route 60 operates on approximate 20-minute headways during weekdays and 15-minute headways on weekends. ■ OCTA Route 64: The major route of travel is First Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on First Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the southeast and northwest corners. Route 64 operates on approximate 15-minute headways on the weekdays and 20-minutes on the weekends. ■ OCTA Route 71: The major route of travel is Tustin Avenue. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on Tustin Avenue at 4th Street in the northeast and southwest corners. Route 71 operates on approximate 50-minute headways on the weekdays and 45-minute headways on the weekends. ■ OCTA Route 463: The major route of travel is 4th Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on 4th Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the northeast and southeast corners. Route 463 operates on approximate 25-minute headways on the weekdays and no bus service on the weekends. Figure 3-2 graphically illustrates the transit routes of OCTA within the vicinity of the project. Figure 3-3 identifies the locations of the existing bus stops in proximity to the Project site. Project's Proximity to Bicycle Facilities The City of Santa Ana promotes bicycling as a means of mobility and a way in which to improve the quality of life within its community. The Bikeway Master Plan recognizes the needs of bicycle users and aims to create a complete and safe bicycle network throughout the City. Currently, not many bicycle facilities exist in the study area. However, review of Figure 3-4, which presents the City's Bikeway Master Plan, shows that a Class I bike path is proposed to be built along Tustin Avenue within the vicinity of the Project. City Council 18 — 347 10/3/2023 NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 5 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Parking Requirements per MEMU Requirements To determine the number of parking spaces required to support the proposed Project, the parking requirement was calculated based on parking information published in the City of Santa Ana Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone, Chapter 4.0 Development Standards, Section 4.8 Parking and Access, (A)(2) Village Center District (Section 4.8(A)(2). The following parking ratio was used to determine the required parking: ■ Section 4.8(A)(2)(c): Mixed -use developments with less than 10 percent of the gross floor area devoted to commercial activity: a minimum of 2.0 spaces per residential or live/work unit inclusive of guest parking and any nonresidential uses. ■ Section 4.8(A)(2)(d): Mixed -use developments with 10 percent or greater of the gross floor area devoted to commercial activity: Any development proposal that devotes 10 percent or more of the development's gross floor area to a nonresidential use shall be required to provide a parking study by a city approved consultant to establish an adequate parking requirement for the mixture of uses in the proposed development. In no case, however, shall a standard of less than 2.25 spaces per unit inclusive of guest parking and any nonresidential uses shall be established. Given the proposed Project's commercial floor area, which totals 17,200 SF, equates to less than 10 percent of the Project's total gross floor area, the Project would require 2.0 spaces per residential unit or live/work unit, inclusive of guest parking and any nonresidential uses. Table 2 presents the MEMU parking requirements for the Project. Review of the upper half of Table 2 identifies that the Project's proposed 449 apartment homes component would require 898 spaces. With a proposed parking supply of 898 parking spaces, the City's MEMU parking requirement for this Project component is satisfied. It should be noted that the retail/commercial and resident guest supply consists of 90 spaces located on the ground floor and subterranean level of the parking structure which will be ungated. Review of the lower half of Table 2 identifies that for the Project's proposed 58 unit townhome development, a parking requirement of 116 spaces is required (2.0 spaces per unit x 58 units). With a proposed parking supply of 127 spaces, this Project component has an 11-space parking surplus when compared to the City's MEMU parking requirements. City Council 18 — 348 10/3/2023 NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 6 However, knowing that the retail/commercial and residential guest component of the Project are expected to share spaces and would have peaks that occur at different times of the day a shared parking assessment has been considered. The shared parking approach would be a part of the Project's PMP to ensure adequate parking is maintained for all users of the Project. It is noted that although not counted as a part of the Project's parking supply, an additional 23 on -street parking spaces will be provided on Park Court Place, thus effectively increasing the Project's overall surplus to 34 spaces. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) The Parking Management Plan should incorporate the requirements published in Section 4.8(B)(2) of the MEMU, and also the requirements of Section 4.8(B)(4) of the MEMU as summarized below: ■ 4.8(B)(2). All residential units shall be provided a minimum of one (1) assigned space per unit. ■ 4.8(B)(4). Parking spaces specifically designated for nonresidential and residential uses shall be clearly marked by the use of posting, pavement markings, and/or physical separation. Parking area design shall incorporate a separation of the parking for nonresidential and residential uses, except that guest parking may be combined with nonresidential parking as long as the total required parking for the development is not reduced. As such, to ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants, employees and guests of the Project, it is recommended that when the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company deems it necessary, the following key Parking Management Strategies be implemented by the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company. PMP Measures Specific PMP measures are described below, and were developed based on the following objectives and will be implemented through signage and by on -site management: Objectives- 9 The PMP should restrict residents from parking in the guest spaces. City ouncil 1`1151 — 0/3/2023 NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 7 • The PMP should require guests to park in designated guest spaces. • The PMP should restrict vehicles from exceeding the time restriction on the short term parking, if any is proposed. • The PMP should allow for the use of proposed "short-term/time restricted" parking spaces allocated retail and leasing use for use by residents and resident guests after business hours, if necessary. • The PMP should help develop the framework for a detailed parking agreements between the leasing office and the tenants Retail/Commercial C omnnnent 1. The Property Owner/Property Management Company will implement a reciprocal/shared parking program to ensure the pool of parking for the retail/commercial component and guest of the residential component is available to be "shared". The pool of parking spaces to be allocated for resident guest and retail/commercial use is proposed to be provided on Subterranean Level and Level 1 of the apartment parking structure in compliance of Section 4.8(B)(4) of the MEMU. 2. The Property Owner/Property Management Company will work with tenants of the Project's retail/commercial component to implement an employee parking program, with the goal of providing convenient and accessible shopping experience for the customers of the retail/commercial uses and to leave the most desirable parking spaces within the parking structure for use by customers. The location of designated employee parking spaces will be developed in collaboration between Property Owner/Property Management Company and the tenants. The employee parking spaces will be identified with a white or yellow circle, and/or signage. It is noted that these spaces will be open for customer use. 3. The Property Owner/Property Management Company will work with tenants of the Project's retail/commercial component to identify the need for "short term/time restricted spaces" on an as need basis, dependent on the needs of the proposed retail and/or commercial/office use, These short term spaces will most likely be designated on the ground floor (Level 1) of the Site A parking structure. The short-term spaces may be used for service retail -type users as well as be designated for prospective resident tenants. The number and location of spaces will be determined by Property Owner/Property Management Company and the potential tenants. 4. Retail/commercial customers or visitor of the tenants of apartment mixed -use component of the Project will be able to park, on a first come first serve basis, on the 23 on -street parking spaces along Park Court Place. City Council 18 — 350 10/3/2023 NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 8 Residential Component 5. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall assign one (1) parking space to every unit for the Project's 449 unit apartment component per Section 4.8(B)(2) of the MEMU. Additional spaces may be assigned to any unit that requests additional assigned spaces dependent on the number of bedrooms provided within said unit. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall determine the allocation of parking spaces for resident tenants and location of guest parking spaces, inclusive of spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants. Resident may not park more than two (2) vehicles in the complex unless authorized by the Project Owner/Project Management Company. 6. Residents will be provided a transponder or similar device (fob or key card, etc.) for remote access to the gated residential parking area within the Project's 449 unit apartment component. As shown in the Project site plan, Level 1 of the parking structure will have two residential gates to access the upper levels of the garage. 7. The Property Owner/Homeowner's Association shall require residents of the 58- unit townhomes component to use their garage to park their vehicle. Recognizing that garages are sometimes used for storage, it will be the resident's responsibility to ensure that a resident's vehicle can park in the garage with the door closed. No boats or RV's are allowed. Resident vehicles not parking in their garage space will be towed. 8. Pending the requirements of the Property Owner/Homeowner's Association Company, resident vehicles may be allowed to parked temporary outside their garages. However, if a temporary valid permit is not obtained from the Property Owner/Property Management Company and is not properly displayed, the vehicle may be towed at the owners' expense. The eleven (11) open spaces located within the townhomes component of the Project should be made available to accommodate townhome resident guests parking needs. Resident guests of the townhomes component of the Project will be able to park, on a first come first serve basis, within eleven (11) parking space of the townhome site. 9. Vehicles lacking current registration will not be issued a permit. Vehicles that have lapsed registration will be towed by the Property Owner/Property Management Company or Homeowner's Association. The storage of inoperable or unregistered vehicles is prohibited. 10. Every resident will be required to register their vehicle. The registered owner must be a lease holding resident. No permits will be issued to non -lease holders, City Council 18 — 351 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.docx Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 9 or vehicles not registered to a lease holder. This registration will be updated annually at the time of recertification. 11. Vehicles may not occupy unassigned spaces for more than twenty-four (24) hours, without contacting the leasing office in advance. Violators are subject to towing at the vehicle owner's expense. 12. If you obtain a new vehicle, you must provide new registration, and will be given a new permit (transferring permits is not permissible). 13. Violation of the PMP strategies contained herein may result in the towing of the vehicle at the vehicle owner's expense. 14. The enforcement of resident and resident guest parking on -site parking requirements summarized herein will be handled by the Property Owner/Property Management Company or the Homeowner's Association to ensure compliance. Retail/Commercial & Residential Component 15. Relative to the 23 curbside parking spaces located on Park Court Place, the Property Owner/Property Management Company will work with the City of Santa Ana on time -restrictive signage for these spaces. No overnight parking should be allowed on these spaces and parking should be limited to no more than 2-hours during the period of 8:00 AM to 7:00 PM daily. The PMP may consider limiting resident and/or resident guest parking to after 5:00 PM daily. Given the on -street parking spaces are within the public right-of-way, the installation of the necessary signing and striping improvements will be subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana. Further yet, the enforcement of parking restrictions these public parking spaces would be the responsibility of the City of Santa Ana. 16. Resident guests of the apartment homes component of the Project will be able to park, on a first come first serve basis, within the 90 spaces allocated within the apartment's parking structure or 23 on -street parking spaces along Park Court Place. Resident and/or Resident Guest parking overnight will require prior approval by Property Owner/Property Management Company and a permit. 17. The parking conditions for the Project will be reviewed/monitored on an annual basis by the Property Owner/Property Management Company and Homeowner's Association and appropriate actions detailed above will be taken to ensure that the necessary PMP measures are being implemented. City Council 18 — 352 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 10 Through this monitoring and cooperation with the residents and tenants as a result of the annual review/monitoring, a partnership will be formed to ensure that residential tenants and retail employees and Management Company personnel on the property work together to ensure adequate parking is available. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS To validate the adequacy of the proposed retail/commercial parking supply in combination with the residential guest component a shared parking analysis has been prepared based on the utilization profile of each included land use component. The following section calculates the parking requirements for Project based on the shared parking methodology outlined in ULI Shared Parking, 3Yd Edition. The specific tenancy mix of the Project provides an opportunity to share parking spaces based on the utilization profile of each included land use component. The parking ratios identified above have been used directly for incorporation into a shared parking analysis consistent with the methodology outlined in the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and published in Shared Parking, 3rd Edition. Based on the results of this shared parking assessment, the adequacy of the Project's retail/commercial component and resident guest parking supply of 90 spaces can be determined. Key inputs in the shared parking analysis for each land use include: ■ Peak parking demand by land use for visitors and employees. ■ Adjustments for alternative modes of transportation, if applicable. ■ Adjustment for internal capture (captive versus non -captive parking demand), if applicable. ■ Hourly variations of parking demand. ■ Weekday versus weekend adjustment factors ■ Monthly adjustment factors to account for variations of parking demand over the year. For this analysis, a conservative 10% parking adjustment to account for (1) "walk- in/internal capture" trips attributable to synergy between uses within the Project and adjacent residential uses, and (2) alternative modes of travel (i.e. carpool, vanpool, transit, bicycle, pedestrian) were utilized to provide a conservative parking demand forecast for the proposed Project. For the Project's Live/Work component, it is assumed that 50% of the employee parking needs are attributed to the residents who would occupy these units. These adjustments are representative of the interaction between the Project' retail and residential component and as well as the existing uses in the vicinity of the Project site. City Council 18 — 353 10/3/2023 NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 11 Tables 3 and 4 present the overall weekday and weekend parking demand profiles for the retail/commercial and residential guest components of the Project based on the shared parking methodology. Columns (1) through (3) of these tables present the parking accumulation characteristics and parking demand of the proposed uses for the hours of 6:00 AM to midnight. Columns (4) through (5) presents the expected joint -use parking demand for the Center on an hourly basis and further presents the hourly parking surplus/deficiency for the proposed Project compared to the parking supply of 90 spaces. Both tables highlight the forecast peak parking demand for the retail/commercial center component of the Project during the morning peak hour (shown inM), afternoon peak period (shown inM) and evening peak hour (shown in ). Based on our experience, the shared parking approach summarized in Tables 3 and 4 are believed to be the most appropriate in evaluating the parking supply -demand relationships for Project. The results in these tables are the focus of this parking investigation and recommendations. Shared Parking Results Review of Tables 3 and 4 indicates that the future full occupancy weekday peak retail/commercial and residential guest parking demands will occur at 7:00 PM with a peak demand of 81 spaces. Based on the proposed retail/commercial and residential guest parking supply of 90 spaces, the peak demand hours on a weekday will result in a surplus of 9 spaces. On a weekend, a peak parking demand will occur at 7:00 PM and 8:00 PM with peak demands of 79 spaces resulting in a surplus of 11 spaces. Appendix A contains the detailed weekday and weekend shared parking worksheets. Figures 4-1 and 4-2 graphically illustrate the weekday and weekend hourly parking demand forecast for the shared parking component, respectively. Each of the anticipated land use component/tenant mix and its corresponding hourly Shared Parking demand for various mixes of uses, which were presented in Tables 3 and 4, are depicted in these two figures relative to a proposed parking supply of 90 spaces. A review of these figures indicates that the Project's parking supply for the retail/commercial and resident guest of 90 spaces will adequately accommodate the weekday and weekend hourly shared parking demand CONCLUSIONS Based on the above, it is concluded that adequate parking will be provided to satisfy the parking demand for residents, guests and employees of the Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project. Nevertheless, to ensure adequate parking is provided for all users Of tCity d6uncil 18 — 3 4 10 3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Grant Williams December 9, 2022 Page 12 deem it necessary, would implement and enforce the appropriate Parking Management Strategy recommended in this Parking Management Plan, to ensure that accessible and convenient parking is available for all users at all times. In summary, the proposed Project provides more than adequate parking to accommodate the needs of both the retail/commercial users and residential users. The proposed PMP measures would help ensure these adequacies for all. * * * * * * * * * * * We appreciate the opportunity to provide this analysis for FRH Realty and the City of Santa Ana. Should you have any questions, please call us at 949.825.6175. Respectively submitted, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Richard E. Barretto, P.E. Principal Attachments cc: Shane Green, P.E., Senior Transportation Engineer F-. � No. 2006 O ExP6/3o/23 TRAFFIC of �vF City Council 18 — 355 10/3/2023 NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- Popeyes 17th St Q Louisiana Kitchen `►' 17th St z z ct � a £ n b a D a :3 N. E isrry E 151A sl D E 141h A E 141h St vvenay s W wens cargo aanK rarmer uoys V m 18 � El Polio Loco Q • 17th St Navy Federal Starbucks Q Credit Union Superior Grocers P Q E 161h S1 Alberlsons ® © 4 Ross Dress for Less Little Caesars Pizza F. 15m St d Q Black Angus Steakhouse Q a` N Jack in the Box W a e o ? ElTorito4 17thSt 19Citibank 1 v Enderle Center © Belacan Grill - Q CVS Malaysian Bistro The Crab Cooker 90 V� Vandettt�� via U ado Art via Cadma Fia9 a W W E Wash Inglon Ave 1 g H z • EWellinglori Ave Z 3 u C c y P 1 _ a EWMlrnglon Ave = v z d © n z J Q ro undo Ave i Wellington Avg • Qj � 3 st _ Redwoods Homeowners O Orange County © 'v ? Association v Global MedicalCenier 0 No evdoa,kat P�2 glud z < o Cr Cr AhaF r9°S1 21ahuryPark © W °© A 4 Purw Or R to EHun St • • Errwl St • EFrua Sr111 i sa��a Lake Dianne Apartments q z Y " Village Apartments Cabrillo Park 9 P c _ _ ? Q Am3gon ael Wnv e � © E 6m p .-Att�l n Red Cross n a E 6th Sr o::..:.........T ro $}iSI>F}R ation Center 3 Z a�::........:......IIi a v Helen Estock E 611t Sr rslh.t Elementary School z................. I h ra l 'G'r w z r m 2 yr?E{•:rirti "1 Vmawneg Avr ' n c ... ink Together4 The UPS Store r' ro Chevron ^ 8 a California Department o is De Anda O of Try Cation... bed 10 11 Q 13 0 14 15 Y iSN 9..�::::• :4th SI E 41h St E 4th S1 • • Q • Consul do de Mexico ® • rQ Oel iaca • INlne livid • f ® r 16 Encompass Health of Guadalupe t 0• St. Joseph Heritage ' ©Rehabilitation Hospital... ne Our Lady p Mdi IGcuS t We Wellington Ave Big ap,g41*e Im 014 No 10 o' ch atham er D m Th $herafoolt Or Amago+'g`�qlay Amagarset Way © Westbury LA Antler Dr Cc TutIrvine Blvd In e ca op an a..� 3 w z nsy Church (3rd)® z c o Palms Nineteen0l -a z a W $ - lurTres o Social Se : - • -Dartment Homes o s The Path Bike Shop Ilanlas... T Motel o Santa Ana Q K r = 3 < Q z © El Pollo Norteno dmini, 1 17 Avila s El Ranchito Q D D v n McDonald': 0. gs e Ot 2 •O I ©Fjr?;rStreet "• W First SS11 0 W First St W First St E First St E First St E First st • • 1 ompoundinharmacy o O Santa Ana DMV ® P WSS -n Advance habv , 3 n Peppertree I Slnr Ira Cantar of Ti Icon ro •. Pnrle City Council SOURCE: GOOGLE KEY ® = STUDY INTERSECTION = ROADWAY SEGMENT 1 3F5ffCT SITE CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIX FIGURE 1-1 INITY MAP , SANTA ANA n c 0 L.. i ........ .. . ' .. '.': ... ...'- .... ........ �� � � � ��r+. -mil # 'f;"� F.�.... 4 •��� ...... ---- •AMr I IN r� k ... .: .� -.Lill.�. ....t! 110. `I : ..... SOURCE: GOOGLE i KEY FIGURE 2-1 �•� = PROJECT SITE N Cit Council 18 — 357 SITE PLAN y CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIX - T, SANTA ANA *7 iM�1 WQp . �h Am 1 I , y G ■ Lh �- fA •1 1: 1 1 3 .. JJ. SOURCE: ARCHITECTS ORANGE SCALE FIGURE 2-2 �NO PROPOSED SITE PLAN City Council 18 — 358 CABRILLO TOWN CENTER AWW2022CT, SANTA ANA z N O N y� r ANTA ANA STATION 41 lw J" u 3 • I 6 � o 1 • Q W' 1Now N a • • (tNO SCALE SOURCE: OCTA KEY = PROJECT SITE FIGURE 3 - 2 OCTA TRANSIT MAP —USE PROJECT. SANTA ANA r rtannea Paremn000 - Cr Santa Ana Health Center 4 Q Q 0 © Q 171h st Storbucks 17 Target Q ® O 0 Q Zou's Bakery ( Q Superior Grocers Ross press for Less 0 's n } % a e ist, s� c cQ�"s a r +stt: s: c Vand eqLbe Q a s eTots st - Black Angus Steakhouse E Vfashingtan Avo <O h'I A B U R Y PARK E WeumptonAve ? �pnaeana�e Redwoods Homeowners 0 ASSOCt$tlon 4 a LL f. 0-ap a n:rrsnda 1° Oran _ aunty •z Global Medienter m Nor 4 r U ' � Z� a$ � t:n ffiAOm Pt Lake Dianne Aparimenls 19 s : quo 53 DID a e The ID � sn erbrnd+ [3r �a Cabrillo Park 3 � Am6ganacllMsT B� i r e m s' Helen Estock w� air s _ _ _ ... W Elementary School �_ _ _ _ _ _i z Ma et Qr Colur I © Tustin 'f41} SADDLEBACK r V I E W co uulmi Mexico � hvine9lvd rY o 0 limited Mutel G Santa Alw 4 Social Securrty v� AdministOon E, W P o 111--postal � '1 Q Q Santa Ana 0 MV 0 E First St 55 W Fh st 5t a pear" N � m 0 p,rk .9 SOURCE:19 O KEY FIGURE 3-3 LINS OTT LAIM1' & (tNO PROJECT = TRANSIT STOP TRANSIT STOP LOCATIONS engineers CARRILLO TOWN CFNTFR ►I XPROJFCT, SANTA, SOURCE: CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN KEY FIGURE 3-4 = PROJECT SITE = CLASS III BIKE ROUTE/BOULEVARD (tNOCLASS I PATH = CLASS IV CYCLE TRACK SCALE = CLASS II BIKE LANE CITY OF SANTA ANA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT SANTA ANA 60 30 TOTAL PARKING SUPPLY = 90 SPACES — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — sl r� 4e 77 !u 6a 61 54 Iri a6 o n 36 30 29 25 20 11 10 2 0 600AM 7�00AM 8:00AM 9'.00AM 111.111 1100AM 1200111 1:00PM 2:00PM 3.001M 4'00PM 1.001M 6-00111 7:00111 8'00PM 1001M 1000PM 11�00PM 1200A11 Total 2 11 25 36 46 48 49 50 53 49 46 54 60 81 77 70 63 48 29 ■ Office 1 3 9 16 19 17 13 14 18 16 13 10 A 3 1 1 0 0 0 ■ Residential Guest 0 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 23 34 58 58 53 18 46 29 ■ Retail 1 2 4 8 15 19 24 24 23 21 21 21 22 20 18 11 5 2 0 FIGURE 4-1 WEEKDAY HOURLY PARKING DEMAND WN CENTER MIXED -USED PROJECT. SANTA ANA 0 0 3 0 0 TOTAL PARKING SUPPLY = 90 SPACES 90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 80 79 79 75 a 0 70 69 N 0 r 0 60 56 ro 0 52 0 i 50 0 46 E � m 40 40 40 40 39 39 38 a � 33 / 31 3 30 29 / 0 21 ° 20 15 3 10 0 1 0 � o 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM Total 1 15 21 29 33 39 40 40 40 39 38 46 56 79 79 75 69 52 31 ■ Office 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■ Residential Guest 0 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 24 36 60 60 60 60 49 31 N ■ Retail 1 2 8 16 19 25 26 27 27 26 25 22 20 19 19 15 9 3 0 FIGURE 4-2 WEEKEND HOURLY PARKING DEMAND WN CENTER MIXED -USED PROJECT. SANTA ANA TABLE 1-1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY' CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED, SANTA ANA Land Use / Project Description Project Development Totals Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use ❑ Site A: 5-Story Wrap o Studio Units 23 Units (5.1 %) 0 1 Bedroom Units 264 Units (58.8%) 0 2 Bedroom Units 148 Units (33.0%) o Live -Work / 2 Bedroom Units 141 Tnits (3.1 %1 Total Apartment Units: 449 Units ❑ Site A: Commercial o Retail 5,800 SF o Live/Work Commercial (shopkeeper) 11,400 SF Total Commercial Space: 17,200 SF ❑ Site B: 3-Story Townhomes 58 units o Total Residential Units: 507 Units Parking Supply ❑ Site A — Parking Structure o Resident Parking 8 spaces o Retail/Commercial/Guest Parking 90 spaces Site A Parking Supply: 898 spaces ❑ Site B o Resident - two -car Garage per unit 116 spaces o Resident/Guest — Open Parking 11 spaces Site B Parking Supply: 127 spaces Total Parking Supply: 1,025 spaces On -Street (Park Court Place) 2 23 spaces 1 Source: Architects Orange, 11/10/2022. 2 gOnn--�streett�spaces shgorwn to be provided are not for "exclusive use" of the Project, but would be available for use to accommodate resident l Illy ff6U 1'1CI1 short-term parking demand associate wl Project' tail/ �Qparpercia component. 1 O/3/ZO23 NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.docx TABLE 1-2 PROJECT APARTMENTS PARKING SIJMMARY3 CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED, SANTA ANA Level RESIDENT PARKING RESIDENT GUEST/ RETAIL & COMMERCIAL PARKING Total Standard Handicap Accessible Electric Vehicle Standard Handicap Accessible Electric Vehicle Sub-T - - - 43 - - 43 Leven 39 - - 33 5 9 86 Level2 113 6 17 - - - 136 Level3 113 6 17 - - - 136 Level4 114 5 17 - - - 136 Level5 114 5 17 - - - 136 Level6 123 - - - - - 136 Level6.75 89 - - - - - 89 705 22 68 76 5 9 Subtotal 90 808 898 Total 3 icy ouny range, 18 - 365 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.doex TABLE 2 METRO EAST MIXED -USE PARKING STANDARD4 CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED, SANTA ANA Land Use /Project Description Size Parking Ratios Spaces Required Ca HIM Town Center Apartments o Studio Units 23 DU 2.0 space per Unit, inclusive of guest parking 46 o One (1) Bedroom Units 264 DU 2.0 space per Unit, inclusive of guest parking 528 o Two (2) Bedroom Units 148 DU 2.0 space per Unit, inclusive of guest parking 296 o Live/Work (2-Bedroom) Units 14 DU 2.0 space per Unit, inclusive of guest parking 2$ Total 449 units 898 A. Total Residential Parking Code Requirement: 898 B. Proposed Residential Parking Supply: 898 C. Residential Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-) [Row B — Row A]: +0 D. Residential Use Code Composite Parking Demand Ratio (sp/du) [Row A - total DU] 2.0 Cahrilln Town Center Retail Commercial 5,800 SF -- -- o Retail o Live/Work Office/Commercial 11,400 SF -- Total 17,200 SF 0 E. Total Commercial Parking Code Requirement: 0 F. Proposed Commercial Parking Supply: 0 G. Commercial Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-) [Row F — Row E]: 0 Cahrilln Town Center Towmhomec 26 DU 2.0 space per Unit, inclusive of guest parking 52 o Two (2) Bedroom Units o Three (3) Bedroom Units 20 DU 2.0 space per Unit, inclusive of guest parking 40 o Four (4) Bedroom) Units 12 DU 2.0 space per Unit, inclusive of guest parking 24 Total 58 units 116 H. Total Residential Parking Code Requirement: 116 I. Proposed Residential Parking Supply: 127 J. Residential Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-) [Row I — Row HI: +11 K. Residential Use Code Composite Parking Demand Ratio (sp/du) [Row H _ total DU] 2.0 " Source: City of Santa Ana Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone, Chapter 4.0 Development Standards, Section 4.8 Parking and Access 5 Mixed -use developments with less than 10 percent of the gross floor area devoted to commercial activity: a minimum of 2.0 spaces per "Ment or y OUlllcll r um inclusive o goes parking an any nonresl 119 us 1�.66 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- TABLE 3 WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND SUMMARY [1] CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED, SANTA ANA Land Use Retail Office/Commercial (Live/Work) Residential Guest Shared Parking Demand Comparison w/ Parking Supply 90 Spaces Size Pkg Rate[21 5.800 KSF 5.0 /KSF 11.400 ESF 3.0 /KSF 449 DU 0.15 /DU [31 Gross Spaces 29 Spc. 34 Spc. 67 Spc. Time of Day Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Surplus (Deficiency) 6:00 AM 1 l 0 2 88 7:00 AM 2 3 6 11 79 8:00 AM 4 9 12 25 65 10:00 AM 15 19 12 46 44 11:00 AM 19 17 12 48 42 12:00 PM 24 13 12 49 41 1:00 PM 24 14 12 50 40 3:00 PM 21 16 12 49 41 4:00 PM 21 13 12 46 44 5:00 PM 21 10 23 54 36 6:00 PM 22 4 34 60 30 7:00 PM 20 3 58 81 9 8:00 PM 18 1 58 77 13 9:00 PM 11 1 58 70 20 10:00 PM 5 0 58 63 27 11:00 PM 2 0 46 48 42 12:00 AM 0 0 29 29 61 = Green highhed represents morning peak parking demand hour = Blue highlighted represents afternoon peak parking demand hour = YelloWBOLD highlighed represents overall/evening peak parking demand hour Notes. [1 ] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking,"Third Edition, 2020. [21 Parking rates for all land uses based on City code. [31 Guest parking requirement is calclated at 0.15 spaces/unit to establish the baseline resident guest parking need which is consistent with the ULI shared parking ratios. City Council 18 — 367 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- TABLE 4 WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND SUMMARY [1] CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED, SANTA ANA Land Use Retail Office/Commercial (Live/Work) Residential Guest Shared Parking Demand Comparison w/ Parking Supply 90 Spaces Size Pkg Rate[21 5.800 KSF 5 /KSF 11.400 I{SF 3 /KSF 449 DU 0.15 /DU [31 Gross Spaces 29 Spc. 34 Spc. 67 Spc. Time of Day Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Surplus (Deficiency) 6:00 AM 1 0 0 1 89 7:00 AM 2 1 12 15 75 8:00 AM 10:00 AM 8 19 1 2 12 12 21 2 33 69 61 57 11:00 AM 25 2 12 39 51 12:00 PM 26 ML 2 12 40 50 1:00 PM 27 1 12 40 50 2:00 PM 27 1 12 40 50 3:00 PM 26 1 12 39 51 4:00 PM 25 1 12 38 52 5:00 PM 22 0 24 46 44 6:00 PM 20 0 36 56 34 7:00 PM 19 0 60 79 11 8:00 PM 19 0 60 79 11 9:00 PM 15 0 60 75 15 10:00 PM 9 0 60 69 21 11:00 PM 3 0 49 52 38 12:00 AM 0 0 31 31 59 = Green highhed represents morning peak parking demand hour = Blue highlighted represents afternoon peak parking demand hour = YelloWBOLD highlighed represents overalUevening peak parking demand hour Notes. [11 Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking,"Third Edition, 2020. [2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code. [3] Guest parking requirement is calclated at 0.15 spaces/unit to establish the baseline resident guest parking need which is consistent with the ULI shared parking ratios. City Council 18 — 368 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Parking & PMP\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Parking Study & Parking Management Plan 12-09-2022.do- APPENDIX A ULI PARKING CALCULATION WORKSHEETS BASED ON 3RD EDITION OF SHARED PARKING LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers City Council N:\4510822453�Weld Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Pa 10 lyfj;AS p Dividers.doc Appendix A SHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS) WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] ®Shopping Center (Typical Days) :II Guest Parking Demand Employee Parking Demand Shared Parking Demand I' I' II II 11 IIIII�IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,1111111111111111111111IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,�11111111111IIIIIIIII,111�111111111,111111111111111111;�llllllllll11111111111111111111111111�11111111111111111111,111111111,1111111111'lllllllll,llllllllll11111111�111111�®II�IIIIII�IIIIII�®®®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIII� III®' ®®®®®®®IIIIII�®®®®®®III®' IIIIIIIIII,11111111111IIIIIIIII,1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111!1�11111111111111111111�®®®®®®®®®®®®® ' 11 III®' IIIII�' IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�©©IIIIII�©IIIIII�IIIIII�®©®111�111111�111111111111111111;111IIIIII�©©®®®®®Illlll�lllllli©©©©IIIII�' IIIII�' IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIII�IIIIII�IIIII�' IIIII�' IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII� �IIII�' IIIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�©©IIIIII�©IIIIII�IIIIIII�®IIIIIII�® 'III®' ®®®®®®®®®®®®IIIIII�IIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIIIII,11111111111111111111,111111111,111111�®IIIIIII�®®!� II 'III®' IIIIIII�IIIIII�IIIII�IIIIII;�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIIIII,IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIIIII,IIIIIII�® "IIII�' ®©IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�©©IIIIII�®®IIIIIII!��IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�®!�®IIIIIII!��IIIIIII!��®®Illllllf� �IIII!�®IIIIIIIII,®®®®®®®®®®®IIIIII�'III®®IIIIII�IIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIII�®®®®®®©®®IIIIII�' Illllllf�®!�IIIIIII�®IIIIIIII!��®Illllllf!��llllllll!��lllllll�®® ' I'll�llllll�lllllllll,®®®IIIIIII�IIIIIII�®IIIIIII�®®IIIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�'III®®101010110111111�1101010111111�10®©®IIIIIII�IIIIII�' �r�Illlllll�llllll�llllll�llllllll!��llllll�llllllll�lllllllf�lllllll�lllll�® �IIII�'�' IIIIIII�IIIIIIIII,IIIIIII�®®®®®®®®®IIIIIII�®III®®®IIIIII�IIIIII�®Illllli�lllllli�®®®®®®®®®Illllllf�llllll�' ®®Illllllf�lllllll�®®IIIIIII�®® ' III�IIIIII�' IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�®®®IIIIII�®IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,®IIIIII�®III®®®��®Illllli��®®IIIIII�IIIIII�®©®®®®®IIIII®' IIIIII;�' ®IIIIII�' ®®IIIIII�®IIIIII;� �Illli/�'i®IIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIIIII,IIIIIII�®®11111111111®IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,®®®III®®®®�®®®®®®®®®®®®®®IIIIII�' IIIIII�' ®IIIIII�' ®®®®® �IIII�IIIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�®11111111;11®®®®11111111111®®Illllllf�®III�IIIIII�®®®Illlll�llllll�lllllli�lllllli�lllllli�®®IIIIII�®®®®®IIIIII�' ®IIIIII�' IIIIIII�IIIIIII�' IIIIII;�®®IIIIIII�®IIIIII� II ' III�},�®©IIIII�IIIIIIIII,IIIIII;�IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,IIIIII�IIIIIIIII,IIIIII�IIIIIIIII,®®®III©©IIIII�IIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�©IIIII+�®®®IIIIII�®®®®IIIIIII�®®IIIII..��IIIIIII� �IIII't'�' ®IIIIIII�®®®IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIIII�©IIIIII�®IIIII�IIII�IIIIII�®®®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIIi�lllllli�®®®IIIIII�®®IIIIII�®®®®®®®®®IIIIII�®® �III�®IIIIII"i®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�©®IIIIII�®®®®®III©�IIIIIIIII,®®IIIIII"i®®®®®®®® 11 ' �IIIIIII♦�IIIIIII��IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII�IIIIIII�III�IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII♦IIIIIII■IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦Illllli�llllll�®©®®Illlll�llllll�llllll�llllllillllll�llllll�� !®!��©®�I�IIIIII�®®®IIIIII�IIIIII7�IIIIII�®Illllli� �IIIII�IIIII�IIIII� IIIII�IIIIII� IIIII�IIIII� IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII� IIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII� IIII�IIIIII� IIIII�IIIII� IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIIII� IIIII� IIIII�IIIII�IIIII� IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIIII� IIIII�IIIIII� IIIII�®®IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII� Notes- [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. I31 PAQO9 ENEt relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. City Council 18 — 370 10/3/2023 Appendix A SHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS) WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] ®Shopping Center (Typical Days) :II Guest Parking Demand Employee Parking Demand Shared Parking Demand I' I' II II 11 ��11111111111IIIIIIIII,1�11111����111111�11111111111111111111,�11111111111111111111,�' �111111111111111111■1111111111111111�111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,111111111,1111111111'lllllllll,lllllllll,llllllllll1111111�®�I�IIIIII�®®®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIII� �IIII'�'i®®®®IIIIII�®©IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�®®®®III®11111111111111111111, ®®®®®®®®®®®©®®!�®®IIIIII� IIIIII�®�®®IIIIII�®IIIIIII� � 11 III�IIIIIII�©111111�111111�111111�111111�111111�111111�111111�111111�111111�11111�11111111111IIIIII�III�®®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�©©IIIIII�' �Illllllfi®IIIIIII�®®®®IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII,®IIIIII�' IIIIIII� II I'll�lllll!l}��lllllllll,®®®IIIIIII�IIIIIII�®11111111i®®®IIIIII�IIIIII�III�IIIII�' IIIIII�IIIIII�©©©©©®®®©IIIII�IIIII�' ®®IIIIII�' �IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�®® �Illlil�' IIIII�®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®IIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIII�©©®®®®IIIII'�IIIII'�IIIII�®IIIIII!'��®IIIIIII�®IIIIIII�IIIIII;��IIIIII;��IIIIIII�IIIIII�®IIIIII�® ' I I' ®®®®IIIIIII�®®®®IIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIII�' ®IIIIII� 11 IIIII�1010©©©©©©IIIIII�®®110' 10' ®IIIIII�' IIIIIIIIrr����IIIIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�'�IIIII�'�IIIIII�IIIIII�®®IIIII� II' Illli,��'�IIIII�'�®®IIIIII�®®�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�®IIIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIII� 11'�' 10®®®®IIIIII�©©©®®110' 10' IIIII�' IIIIII�' IIIIII�' ®IIIIII �IIII"�'illllll�lllllllll,®®®®®®IIIIIII�®®®®IIIIII '�II�©IIIIII�®®®®®IIIIII�®®®®IIIII '�IIIII '�®®IIIIII '�Illllll�llllllli®®®®®®®®® q��®®IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIII�IIIII�'�IIIII�' �IIII'L'�®©®IIIIIIIII, IIIIIII�IIIIIIIII,111111111111111111111111111111111111111�111111111, ®®®IIII�IIIIII� ®®Illlll�llllll�llllll�lllllli�lllllli�llllll� ®®IIIIII� ®®®®®®®®®1�®®®®®IIIII�IIIIIII!�� ' �Im©IIIII�IIIIII;�IIIIII;�IIIIII;�IIIIII:��IIIIIIIII,IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIIIII,®®�©©IIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIII�©IIIIII�®®�Illlll�llllll�llllllliilllllll�®IIIIIII�IIIIIII�®IIIIII�IIIIIIII� 11 ' �©IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦�®IIIIII�III�IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦IIIIIII♦©�IIIIII�®©©IIIIII�©Illlllillllll�©IIIIII�©© Notes- [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [31 PAQO9 ENEt relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. City Council 18 — 371 10/3/2023 AppendixA OFFICE WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] ii KSF Guest Parking Employee Parking Shared Parking IC�iL9'L� ,0.50 Of NA [3j ��������0�00®�0�0000000�00000®0000000000000® ��00000000000000®�0®®0®®®®®®0®©0©�0®®�0©AA©�0 ��00000�00�00000®0000000000000000000000000000 Ott' �00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 tt' �00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 ��00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 Nntec, [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [31 fRb WTSfI&t relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. City Council 18 — 372 10/3/2023 AppendixA OFFICE WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] ii KSF Guest Parking Employee Parking Shared Parking IC�iL9'L� ,0.50 . t �00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 ��00�0®®0®��00�0®0000000000000000000000000000 Ott' �00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 tt' �00000000000000�0©0®©®00000©©0©®0©0®®000©®©0 lt' �00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 ��000�00�0�00000�0000000000000000000000000000 lt' �00000�00000000�000000000000000000000000000� tt' �®®®00®®0®®��00�0000000®®0000®0000000®®0000® tt' �000000000�0000�000000000000000000000�000000 ��00000��0�0000���00000®00®�00�00®��0�0000000 tt• t®'' 00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 ��00000®QQ�00000�0000�00000�000�00�000�00000� Ott' t®'' 00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 tt' �00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 ��00000000000000�0000000000000000000000000000 Nntec, [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [3) Pdb�t£Ptkt relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. City Council 18 — 373 10/3/2023 AAppendix RESIDENTIAL WEEKDAY 00 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Resi Falls 440 DU 'I II IISue. est 67 Total Snares ���ir��000000000o t I ors+irii�iriu����ri�iri��000�00000000�0000000 II �00000000000000 .I'. o�000000000000000000000000000© It • �m��®��®®®��®mm�o®00000000®0000��®��®mom®®®���� Notes. V] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," hird Edition, 2020. pi4eO`f fit; S"r� Pdt�Oi9' 1," relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized m able 2-2 of the "Shared Paz ing" manual. City Council 18 — 374 10/3/2023 AAppendix RESIDENTIAL WEEKEND S4 Mft PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Residential 440 DU 11-00 ����ir��000000000o t I orii�+irii�iriu����ri�iri��000�00000000�0000000 It • �m®m®®®®�m®®®®®�o�00000000®0000�®®®m®®®��®®m®® Notes. VSource: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," 1ird Edition, 2020. p'i4eO`f �C S"r� Pdl�O""11," relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized m able 2-2 of the "Shared Paz ing" manual. City Council 18 — 375 10/3/2023 I& 4W THE CONCORD GROUP IV Executive Summary To: FRH Realty LLC From: The Concord Group Date: April 13, 2023 Re: Market Assessment and Economic, Fiscal, and Retail Impact Analyses for a Mixed -Use Development in Santa Ana, California (Cabrillo Town Center) Background: We understand FRH Realty LLC ("FRH") is pursuing the development of a 507-unit community (449 rental, including 12 live/work units, and 58 for -sale) plus 6,000 square feet of retail located at Cabrillo Park and 4" Streets in Santa Ana, California. As you prepare submittals to the City of Santa Ana, The Concord Group ("TCG") prepared a third -party confirmation of the rent/revenue levels for the product offerings as well as calculated the primary fiscal and economic benefit to the City of Santa Ana from the development of the sites. Response to Peer Review: • The study was peer reviewed by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. ("EPS") and their comments were taken into account. Key Findings: • Due to the mixed -use environment and strong access and visibility, TCG concludes the rental apartments, for -sale townhomes and ground floor retail are well positioned within the market. • Given the proposed land -use mix and rent/pricing assumptions provided by FRH, TCG projects the overall assessed value upon stabilization to be $286 million • Over the course of the 28-year analyzed period, 3-year construction followed by a 25- year operating forecast, The Subject Site will have a positive fiscal and economic impact on the City of Santa Ana generating $8.3 million in net new revenues. • The project will generate 1,266 new direct jobs over the 3-year construction period and 21 direct jobs from on -going operations after completion of the development. • A total of 1,913 total temporary jobs including direct, indirect, and induced jobs will be created during the 3-year construction period and 32 total direct, indirect, and induced permanent jobs from operations. • The city of Santa Ana will also receive an additional $15.5 million in revenue for permits and fees to develop on the Subject Site • Currently, the Subject Site is generating approximately $250K in recurring revenue, the proposed development will increase recurring revenue to $368K per year on a net revenue basis FRH Realty LLC 22179. i y ifounci 18 — 376 10/3/20M 1 I 2023 THE CONCORD GROUP Key Findings (cont.): • Redevelopment of the Site from commercial uses will not negatively affect the local neighborhood as the market performance suggest an oversupplied commercial zone, and given the vacant space surrounding the Site gives the opportunity to relocate within the local neighborhood Site Overview and Market Areas: • The Project is located in Santa Ana, California on the corner of Cabrillo Park Dr and 4'" Street, adjacent to the 1-5 freeway, a regional connector of Southern California. The Project is close in proximity to the 1-55. • The proposed land uses offered include residential apartments, for -sale townhomes, and ground floor retail. • The Site is located on an 8.98-acre parcel planned over a 3-year construction period anticipated to be 2023 through 2026. The breakdown of the anticipated development program at buildout consists of the following: 0 449 residential apartment units including 12 live/work units containing 9.000 SF of commercial space (898 parking stalls) 0 58 for -sale townhome units (130 parking stalls) 0 6,000 square feet of ground floor retail • The Competitive Market Area ("CMA") represents the geographic source of competitive supply and is defined by the cities of Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, Irvine, Orange, and Tustin. Pricing Confirmation: TCG evaluated the sponsor development scenario provided by FRH to evaluate the market rent/price potential for each land use including: 449 rental apartment units, 6,000 square feet of ground floor retail, and 58 for -sale townhome units. The following tables and figures breakdown the sponsor program to confirm if the current sponsor rents/prices are feasible in the Market. Rental Apartments • The subject Site is positioned in -line with top -of -market comparables in Orange on a nominal basis including new comparables, Aura Apartments and Vita Apartments. The Site's mixed -use orientation merits the positioning, although the Site's location is slightly inferior. The subject site is positioned at a premium to older Santa Ana and Tustin product due to a newer vintage but positioned at a discount to new comparables located in downtown Santa Ana due to an inferior location. TCG confirms the planned rents for the Site are well positioned in the Market. FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 — 377 10/3/2023 THIF CONCORD GROUP Planned Program Bed / Unit Mix Unit Base Rent Unit Mix Floorplan Bath Num. Share Size $ S/SF Studios 7% 1 BR/1 BA -STUDIO 0 / 1.0 32 7% 600 $2,320 $3.87 1-Beds 59% 1 BR/1 BA -Al 1 / 1.0 80 18% 700 $2,550 $3.64 2-Beds 34% 1 BR/1 BA-A2 1 / 1.0 99 22% 730 $2,625 $3.60 3-Beds 0% 1 BR/1 BA-A3 1 / 1.0 85 19% 780 $2,725 $3.49 2BR/2BA-B1 2 / 2.0 36 8% 1,000 $3,225 $3.23 2BR/2BA-B2 2 / 2.0 60 13% 1,065 $3,395 $3.19 2BR/2BA-B3 2 / 2.0 45 10% 1,090 $3,475 $3.19 2BR/2.5BA-B4-LW 2 / 2.5 12 3% 1,460 $3,895 $2.67 Total / Average: 449 100% 847 $2,879 $3.40 $6,000 Color = Submarket $5,750 Red = Santa Ana Blue = Costa Mesa $5,500 Green = Irvine Orange = Orange Pink = Tustin $5,250 Broadstone Atlas $5,000 • 8 ■ $4,750 - O - Aura Apartments ' Vita Apartments $4,500 G G 0 !■ ❑ ❑❑ O $4,250 - G G O + ❑ y , ❑ ❑ O y $4,000 ❑ ❑ m $3,750 9 ❑ + + ❑ • tp X C ❑ O -P O $3,500 000 $3,250 O '-Y7X ❑ R • t; + +F + O u0 ❑ ❑ O $3,0008 ❑ ❑O Cb ❑ ++ �G X $ 2, 750 O � O O • • 0 �, , X .. ❑ + $2,500 --- C"X OX X . I 580 Anton I $2,250 ON ! Rancho Alisal $2,000 IF •• 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 Unit Size ■ Broadstone Archive (2020, 83%) ♦ Broadstone Arden (2019, 91 %) ♦ Broadstone Atlas (2022, 1 %) ■ 888 On Main (2021, 86%) ■ The Marke (2014, 96%) • 580 Anton (2018, 92%) ■ Baker Block (2018, 99%) O Amalfi (2014, 98%) ❑ Rancho Alisal (1986, 98%) ♦ El Pasco (1987, 94%) O Aura Apartments (2022, 4%) ❑ Vita Apartments (2022, 29%) O AMU Uptown Orange (2016, 98%) -Planned Program FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 - 378 10/3/2023 THIF CONCORD GROUP Ground Floor Retail • Subject Site rents are in -line with top of market rents in Santa Ana, with a slight discount to downtown Santa Ana lease rates. TCG confirms $36/SF/Yr. is justified. Cabrillo Town Center Sponsor Rents 1945 E 1 7th St 1640 E 1 st St 102 W 2nd St 2321 E 4th St 1703 E 1 7th St 613 E Santa Ana Blvd 431 N Tustin Ave Round Table Pizza 1601 W 17th St 1935 E 1 7th St 2031 E 1 st St 301-307 N Main St FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA ,$36.00 11 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 April 2023 City Council 18 — 379 10/3/2023 THIF CONCORD GROUP For -Sale Townhomes • The Subject Site is positioned at a slight discount to the Parker One townhomes in Orange due to a slightly inferior location. TCG confirms the sponsor prices are well positioned in the Market. Sponsor Program - Townhomes Bed / Unit Mix Unit Base Price Floorplan Bath # % Size (SF) $ $/SF Unit Mix Plan 1 2/2.5 2 / 2.5 6 10% 1,450 $739,900 $510 1 Bed 0% Plan 2 2/2.5 2 / 2.5 6 10% 1,460 $744,900 $510 2 Bed 45% Plan 3 2+Den/3.5 2 / 3.5 14 24% 1,700 $779,900 $459 3 Bed 34% Plan 4 3/3.5 3 / 3.5 20 34% 1,780 $819,900 $461 4 Bed 21 % Plan 4X 3/3.5 3 / 3.5 0 0% 1,820 $829,900 $456 Plan 5 4/3.5 4 / 3.5 12 21 % 1,900 $879,900 $463 Total / Average: 58 100% 1,718 $806,624 $471 $1,900,000 $1,800,000 $1,700,000 $1,600,000 $1,500,000 $1,400,000 d 'c $1,300,000 $1,200,000 $1,100,000 $1,000,000 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 yr Purple = CMA Resales L3M y X (Attached) X O x x x X 11X X x x X X X x x X x x X X 'X /. _ X x O I CMA TH Resales OM x Yx X O X i X X X XI O x x xxo O x x x xx O x >St X x X xc - X x x X XX x x X x x x X X XX X x �x x X X- :� X •' x Xo x x x O O� x O X The i lJ O O O Terraces (Condos) x X X x X X X x XX X X>�0 XX X x x? i x x ParkerOne (TH) X x X X X XX 3TG Xx> X XXx X. X X X O x 'x X X x X X O X X XX X 0 x X # X X0 x O X( 0 0 O X0 X O O x x x pp,X� x k_ x® X x.90 ' x--'x XXX - x0 ox X X Ox Ox X X O X O O X X O 0 1,000 1,200 1,400 tSponsor Program - 3 Story Townhomes A The Terraces (Condo, 153 units) FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA 1,600 Unit Size 1,800 ■ ParkerOne (TH, 74 units) O CMA - Townhome L3M 2,000 2,200 2,400 ♦ The Landing at Tustin Legacy (TH, --- units) X CMA - SFD L3M April 2023 XI City Council 18 — 380 10/3/2023 Fiscal Impact Findings: Table 1 : Fiscal Impact Proiection Summarv: Construction Period + 25-Year Recurrina Tax Forecast 25-Year Recurring Revenue Category Total NPV (4%) Property Taxes $10,452,020 $5,517,384 Prop Tax In- Lie of VLF (1) $4,574,958 $2,421,372 Utility User $3,210,515 $1,724,753 Resi Derived Sale Tax $3,838,764 $2,260,786 Retail Sales Tax $717,990 $432,038 Total City Revenues Less City Expenses Net New Revenues $22,794,248 $14,543,691 $8,250,556 $12,31 1,124 $7,773,266 $4,537,858 Based on a total construction budget of $249 million, TCG projects the City of Santa Ana's recurring revenues to be approximately $22.8 million over the next 25 years after build -out. The net present value of the cumulative tax revenue over the same period at a 4% annual discount rate is $12.3 million. Total City expenditures over the next 25 years after build -out are expected to be $14.5 million ($7.8 million in 2022 dollars) resulting in net new revenues of $8.3 million ($4.5 in 2022 dollars). Employment Impacts: Based on an analysis utilizing Rims II multipliers for Orange County, TCG estimates the employment opportunities for this Project amount to approximately 21 permanent direct jobs. Additionally, 1,913 temporary direct construction jobs will be available during the construction term of the Project. FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 — 381 10/3/2023 THIF CONCORD GROUP Fiscal Impact Analysis: The Project will provide benefits to the City of Santa Ana in the form of site -specific tax revenues generated by the proposed development. In this study, we project "Net New Revenues." Net new revenue is defined as recurring tax revenues to the City or County projected by the Project, less any expenditures generated from the site. The following analysis of the Project -generated revenue is categorized by the following revenue and expenditure sources: • Property Tax • Motor Vehicle License Fee and Property Tax In -Lieu • Utility User Tax • Residential Derived Sales Tax • Retail Sales Tax • Residential Derived City Expenditures FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 — 382 10/3/2023 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: This section presents a summary of our 28-year projections followed by a more detailed description of each component revenue analyzed. The net new tax revenue presented in all fiscal impact revenue projections begins with Construction Year One, "CY1 " in 2023, lasting 3-years, ending in 2025. This is followed by a 25-year operating forecast from 2026 through 2050. Total net new revenues to the City over the 3-year construction period plus the 25-year projection period amount to $22.8 million ($12.3 million in 2022 dollars). Table 2 provides a summary by revenue source of the total net new revenues for the City and County over both the 3-year construction period and the 28-year projection period. The analysis utilizes current market conditions, as provided by FRH, and escalated at a 2% inflation rate. FRH may consider utilizing updated market analyses upon the future construction of the Project to have a more current assessment on the market -driven values. Table 2: Fiscal Impact Projections Construction Period + 25-Year Recurring Tax Forecast Phasing Property Tax Utility User Resi-Derived Retail Gross City Net Year Year Property Tax In -Lieu of VLF Tax Sales Tax Sales Tax City Revenue Expenditures New Total Proforma 2022 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CYl 2023 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CY2 2024 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CY3 2025 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 2026 $108,613 $47,541 $100,234 $198,938 $37,209 $492,534 $454,060 $38,474 2 2027 $339,999 $148,821 $102,238 $202,916 $37,953 $831,928 $463,142 $368,786 3 2028 $346,799 $151,798 $104,283 $206,975 $38,712 $848,566 $472,404 $376,162 4 2029 $353,735 $154,834 $106,369 $168,891 $31,589 $815,418 $481,853 $333,565 5 2030 $360,810 $157,930 $108,496 $172,269 $32,221 $831,726 $491,490 $340,236 6 2031 $368,026 $161,089 $110,666 $175,714 $32,865 $848,360 $501,319 $347,041 7 2032 $375,387 $164,311 $112,879 $179,229 $33,522 $865,328 $511,346 $353,982 8 2033 $382,894 $167,597 $115,137 $182,813 $34,193 $882,634 $521,573 $361,061 9 2034 $390,552 $170,949 $117,440 $186,470 $34,877 $900,287 $532,004 $368,283 10 2035 $398,363 $174,368 $119,789 $190,199 $35,574 $918,293 $542,644 $375,648 11 2036 $406,330 $177,855 $122,184 $194,003 $36,286 $936,658 $553,497 $383,161 12 2037 $414,457 $181,412 $124,628 $197,883 $37,011 $955,392 $564,567 $390,825 13 2038 $422,746 $185,040 $127,121 $201,841 $37,752 $974,499 $575,858 $398,641 14 2039 $431,201 $188,741 $129,663 $102,939 $19,253 $871,797 $587,376 $284,422 15 2040 $439,825 $192,516 $132,256 $104,998 $19,638 $889,233 $599,123 $290,110 16 2041 $448,622 $196,366 $134,901 $107,097 $20,031 $907,018 $611,106 $295,912 17 2042 $457,594 $200,294 $137,599 $109,239 $20,432 $925,158 $623,328 $301,831 18 2043 $466,746 $204,300 $140,351 $111,424 $20,840 $943,662 $635,794 $307,867 19 2044 $476,081 $208,386 $143,158 $113,653 $21,257 $962,535 $648,510 $314,025 20 2045 $485,603 $212,553 $146,022 $115,926 $21,682 $981,785 $661,480 $320,305 21 2046 $495,315 $216,804 $148,942 $118,244 $22,116 $1,001,421 $674,710 $326,711 22 2047 $505,221 $221,140 $151,921 $120,609 $22,558 $1,021,450 $688,204 $333,245 23 2048 $515,325 $225,563 $154,959 $123,021 $23,009 $1,041,879 $701,968 $339,910 24 2049 $525,632 $230,075 $158,058 $125,482 $23,470 $1,062,716 $716,008 $346,709 25 2050 $536,144 $234,676 $161,220 $127,991 $23,939 $1,083,970 $730,328 $353,643 Grand Total: $10,452,020 $4,574,958 $3,210,515 $3,838,764 $717,990 $22,794,248 $14,543,691 $8,250,556 NPV: 4.0% $5,517,384 $2,421,372 $1,724,753 $2,260,786 $432,038 $12,311,124 $7,773,266 $4,549,161 Escalation: 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Source: City of Santa Ana, TCG, FRH FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 - 383 10/3/2023 PROPERTY TAX The City receives a portion of the ad valorem property taxes to pay for municipal services. According to the City of Santa Ana property taxes within the Project is approximately 11 percent of the one percent property tax levy. The County receives 13.1 percent of the one percent property tax levy. The estimated property taxes were based on the FRH Proforma assumptions provided to TCG in March 2022. TCG, using FRH proforma assumptions, estimates that the total value of the development after full build out and stabilized occupancy would be approximately $286 million by end of year 2. Based on the total Project value at stabilization upon 2027, TCG estimates that the City is expected to receive approximately $340K in property tax revenues annually. Assuming no resale and the existing maximum Proposition 13 inflation rate of two percent annually, we project that total property tax revenues to the City would total $10.5 million over the construction period and 28-year projection period, or $5.5 million in 2022 dollars. For a more detailed projection, see Appendix 1. PROPERTY TAX IN -LIEU OF MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSES FEES Established in 1935, the Motor Vehicle License Fee ("VLF") was essentially a tax on vehicle ownership. The State of California ("State") collects VLF annually when vehicles are registered and was historically allocated to cities and counties based on a statutory formula. In 2004, during the State's budget crisis, about 90 percent of each city's VLF revenue was replaced with property tax revenue, and cities in particular began to receive an allocation of property tax from the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund ("ERAF") in an amount equal to whattheywould have received in VLF under an older VLF allocation formula. Under current law, the property tax in -lieu of VLF revenue increases based on assessed value growth in a jurisdiction, thus estimated revenues are based on changes in assessed value created by the Project. While the amount of property tax in lieu varies from city to city under the current apportionment methodology, for Santa Ana, the formula to calculate VLF revenue can be simplified to 5.2 percent of the one percent of the City's total assessed value. Based on projected assessed values, the Project would generate approximately $149K in established property tax in -lieu of VLF revenues at build -out as depicted in Table 3. Over the 28-year forecast, we project the cumulative property tax in -lieu of VLF from the Project to be $4.6 million (or $2.4 million in 2022 dollars) For a more detailed projection, see Appendix 2. FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 — 384 10/3/2023 Table 3: Property Tax Revenue Proposed Project Total Assessed Value City Property Tax Rate Proposed Tax Revenue (2027) 28-Year Revenue 28-Year Revenue (2022 Dollars) Property Tax In -Lieu of Motor Licenses Fees Proposed Project Total Assessed Value Proposed Property In -Lieu of VLF (2027) 28-Year Revenue 28-Year Revenue (2022 Dollars) Assessed Value from FRH, assuming 4.25% cap rate Property Tax rates from City of Santa Ana UTILITY USER TAX Dollars $286,194,565 11.0% $339,999 $10,452,020 $5,506,139 $286,194,565 $148,821 $4,574,958 $2,410,127 The City of Santa Ana assesses a utility user tax of 5.5 percent on electricity, gas, water, and telephone revenues generated in the City. Utility costs were estimated by TCG based on prior review of utility costs. Assumed annual utility expenditures consist of Gas at $295, water at $590, electric at $1,476, and phone at $959. Based on these assumptions, TCG estimates the utility use tax revenues generated by the development to be approximately $3.2 million ($1.7 in 2022 dollars) For a more detailed projection, see Appendix 3. Table 4: Utility User Tax Revenue Energy Expenditures per Houshold Number of Households Total Residential Energy Expenses Santa Ana Tax Rate Cumulative TOT Cumulative TOT, 2022 Dollars ADR and Occupancy from Mountain View Proforma TOT rate from City of Chula Vista FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA $3,321 507 $1,683,644 5.5% $3,210,515 $11713,508 April 2023 City Council 18 — 385 10/3/2023 THIF CONCORD GROUP RESIDENT -DERIVED SALES TAX The additional residential households produced by the Project are expected to result in increased sales for retailers and restaurants. Within a 5-mile radius of the site, ESRI estimates households' expenditures based on taxable and non-taxable sales. TCG estimates approximately $29,000 per household. Due to proximity to other retail centers in neighboring cities, TCG projects 50% of shopping will be done within the Santa Ana city limits. In 2018, Santa Ana residents approved a local transaction and use tax in the City, increasing the sales tax from 7.75% to 9.25% until 2029 and then to 8.75% until 2039, when the additional tax will expire. The resident -Derived Sales Tax Revenues are projected to be $3.8 million, or $1.8 million in 2022 dollars. For a more detailed projection, see Appendix 4. Table 5: Resi-Derived Sales Tax Revenue City Department Taxable Household Expenditures (50%) Number fo Households Estimated Transactions within Santa Ana City share of Sales Tax 2022-2028 Measure X Inc. Tax Rate 2029-2039 Measure X Inc. Tax Rate Resi-Derived Revenue $14,500 507 $262,232,61 1 1.00% 1.50% 1.00% Cumulative TOT $3,838,764 Cumulative TOT, 2022 Dollars $1,785,614 RETAIL SALES TAX The development will include 6,000 square feet of ground floor retail space. Conservatively, TCG projects approximately $250 of sales annually per square feet, resulting in $1.38 million dollars in retail sales. Due to the local transaction and use tax described above, sales tax increases from 7.75% to 9.25% until 2029 and then to 8.75% until 2039, when the additional tax will expire. The Sales Tax Revenues from the development are projected to be $718K, or $328K in 2022 dollars. For a more detailed projection, see Appendix 5. Table 6: Retail Sales Tax Tax Rate Dollars Sales Revenue (2022) $1,375,000 Cumulative Sales Generated $47,672,1 1 1 Cumulative Sales Generated (2022 Dollars) $25,442,648 City share of Sales Tax 1.00% 2022-2028 Measure X Inc. Tax Rate 1.50% 2029-2039 Measure X Inc. Tax Rate 1.00% Cumulative TOT $717,990 Cumulative TOT, 2022 Dollars $328,002 Retail Sales assume $250 per square feet FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 — 386 10/3/2023 CITY EXPENDITURES Based on the assumptions: a studio would house 1.2 residents, one -bedroom unit would house 1.75 residents, two -bedroom unit would house 3 residents, three -bedroom would house 4.25 residents, and four -bedroom units would house 5 residents, TCG concluded the average household size of the property to be 2.35 persons. Based on US Census data approximately 6.5% of Santa Ana residents work within the City, which results in the City of Santa Ana is servicing these residents 100% of the time. 35% of Santa Ana residents work outside the City, assuming a 9am to 5pm job, Santa Ana is servicing these residents 73% of the time. The remaining population can be assumed to be serviced by the City 100% of the time as well, Accounting for all residents and their estimated time spent in the City of Santa Ana, TCG estimated that the project will generate a daily population of 1,108 persons. The Santa Ana budget consists of fixed costs and variable costs. The variable costs will increase or decrease based on the city's population, for example, the city will need additional fire department resources for additional city population. The table below highlights variable costs in the city budget and how the additional households will affect the variable categories. TCG estimates and additional $419K of additional resources needed to satisfy the additional population projected from the project. The project will add an additional $15.0 million in costs over the next 28 years, or $7.9 million in 2022 dollars. For a more detailed projection, see Appendix 6. Table 7: Expenditures Current City Project Derived Total City City Department Expenditures City Expenditures Expenditures City Manager's Office $2,774,200 $2,774,200 City Council $569,280 $569,280 Clerk of the Councils Office $1,470,790 $490 $1,471,280 CityAttorney's Office $2,955,140 $2,955,140 Human Resources $3,455,190 $3,430 $3,458,620 Finance Department $10,416,490 $4,165 $10,420,655 Library $5,864,340 $5,864,340 Parks, Recreation and Community Services $23,289,740 $19,357 $23,309,097 Police Department $141,082,500 $245,024 $141,327,524 Fire Department $51,618,690 $122,512 $51,741,202 Planning & Building Agency $15,535,280 $24,502 $15,559,782 Public Works Agency $15,71 1,070 $15,71 1,070 Community Development Agency $3,898,130 $3,898,130 Museum Fund $1,474,030 $1,474,030 General Non-Dep $49,206,780 $49,206,780 Interfund Transfers $24,173,510 $24,173,510 Cumulative Expenditures FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA Percent Increase 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% 0.10% 0.04% 0.00% 0.08% 0.17% 0.24% 0.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $353,495,160 $419,482 $353,914,642 0.12% April 2023 City Council 18 — 387 10/3/2023 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS: METHODOLOGY: The economic impact analysis utilized Rims II multipliers to estimate the employment and economic output impacts of the Project by using the corresponding industry multiplier to calculate the direct, indirect, and induced effects of developing the Project. To estimate the Prolect's economic impact during the construction phase (construction impacts), TCG multiplied the construction industry multiplier by the construction cost of each product type to segment the employment and economic output. During the construction period, the Project is expected to produce 1,266 direct jobs and a total of 1,913 jobs including indirect and induced jobs. The Project will also produce an economic output of $444 million from the construction of the Project. In order to measure the permanent employment and economic impacts of the Project we must estimate the impacts from ongoing business operations after construction is complete. Using the corresponding Rims II multipliers for industry sectors regarding hotel and apartment/condominium operations TCG was able to estimate 21 direct employees will be generated from ongoing operations and a total of 32 total employees including indirect and induced employees. An estimated $8.7 million of economic output will be generated from ongoing operating expenses on a yearly basis (2022 dollars). Table 8: Employment and Economic Outputs: Construction and Permanent Costs Apartments/Retail Townhomes Construction Costs $220,759,544 $28,118,222 Operating Expenses $4,523,798 Note: Based on proforma assumptions, 2021 dollars Tota I $248,877,766 $4,523,798 Construction Impacts Direct Indirect Induced Total Employment 1,266 323 323 1,913 Apartments 1,123 287 287 1,696 Townhomes 143 37 37 216 Economic Output $248,877,766 $97,734,299 $97,734,299 $444,346,363 Apartments $220,759,544 $86,692,273 $86,692,273 $394,144,090 Townhomes $28,118,222 $11,042,026 $11,042,026 $50,202,274 Permanent Impacts New Employment 21 6 6 32 Apartments 21 6 6 32 Townhomes 0 0 0 0 Economic Output $4,523,798 $2,064,661 $2,064,661 $8,653,121 Apartments $4,523,798 $2,064,661 $2,064,661 $8,653,121 Townhomes $0 $0 $0 $0 Source: Rims II Multipliers for Orange County FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 — 388 10/3/2023 COMMUNITY SERVICE RETAIL ANALYSIS: Background: The city of Santa Ana requires a "Community Service Commercial Retail & Service Diversity Impact Analysis" to ensure availability and diversity of commercial retail and service uses in Santa Ana as part of the development proposal. To meet this objective TCG will analyze the current tenant typologies of the proposed Site to analyze any lost services to the community and look at alternative options for the local neighborhood. Key Conclusions: The redevelopment of the existing Site of 4 commercial buildings into a 507 residential community with 6,000 sf of retail will not negatively affect Santa Ana or the local community by underserving the population of essential services and retail for the following reasons: 1) The site is currently underutilized and is not fully optimizing its potential. The development Site currently includes 4 buildings encompassing 48 suites available for lease. Of the 48 suites, 13 are currently vacant, or approximately 27% of the existing spaces. There is a significant portion of the existing space that is underutilized suggesting an imbalance the supply vs demand dynamics where either there is too much supply of suburban office space or a lack of demand for local neighborhood services. The table below illustrates the breakdown: A 1 Legal Services Financial Services Healthcare Rehabilitation Center Educational Services Non -Profit Business Services Government Alternative Healthcare Mortgage Lender Private Investigator Professional Business Services Real Estate Real Estate Services Recruiting Agency SoCal Services Technoloizv y rVACANT Key Conclusions (continued): FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA 7 6 4 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 15% 13% 8% 6% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 27 % April 2023 City Council 18 — 389 10/3/2023 THIF CONCORD GROUP 2) Within a 0.25-mile radius there is a significant number of commercial tenants that offer the same services to the local community as the current Site's tenants. The existing Site is primarily comprised of tenants that offer legal, financial, or healthcare services which total 17 of the 48 suites, or roughly 36%. In the 0.25-mile radius there are at least 71 commercial spaces offering financial, legal, or healthcare services, equaling approximately 64% of commercial space. Please see the appendix 7 for a breakdown of all tenants. There are local options for the more specialized commercial tenants within a reasonable distance/drive time from the Site. At the Site there are a small number of specialized tenants that may be of more importance to the local community: the rehabilitation center, "Phoenix House", and the healthcare facility "Planned Parenthood". While important to the local community, there are other locations nearby for both services within a reasonable distance. "Phoenix House" has a location 1.2 miles away (4-minute drive) located on Santa Ana Blvd right off the 1-5 freeway and "Planned Parenthood" has a location 1.2 miles away (4-minute drive) off 171" Street and Li nwood FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA Industry Count % Financial Services 30 27% Legal Services 23 21% Healthcare 18 16% Business Services 10 9% Nonclassifiable Estab 4 4% Real Estate Agent 4 4% Engineering 3 3% Educational Services 2 2% Membership Organizations 2 2% Services, NEC 2 2% Recruiting Agency 1 1% Alternative Healthcare 1 1% Construction 1 1% Business Consulting 1 1% Architectural Services 1 1% Government 1 1% Eating Places 1 1% Misc Retail Stores 1 1% Business Associations 1 1% Religious Organizations 1 1% Air Transportation, Scheduled 1 1% Elec Appliances/Tv/Radios 1 1% April 2023 City Council 18 — 390 10/3/2023 THIF CONCORD GROUP Key Conclusions (continued): 3) There is a broader supply vs demand imbalance of the local market in a 0.25-mile radius of the Site. Within the 0.25-mile radius of the Site there is 1,464,600 square feet of commercial space that exists, of the existing space there is 235,000 square feet of space that is available for lease or vacant. The local market for commercial space is not performing strongly with a 17% vacancy rate, suggestive of a supply vs demand imbalance. 4) Given the vacant space in the local neighborhood, there are ample options for essential tenants to relocate to a nearby space. Given the ample amount of vacant space in the 0.25-mile radius of the site, commercial tenants currently located at the Site have the opportunity to relocate within the local neighborhood without affecting their client base, or the local population having to change their services. The available spaces are similar in vintage and have similar lease rates to the existing Site. 5) Local neighborhood retail does not exist onsite, and is rare within the 0.25 radius of the Site The Site and the 0.25-mile radius does not currently have any retail serving space. Delivering 6,000 square feet of retail space aimed at targeting coffee shops, restaurants, or small markets can enhance the local neighborhood and provide not only the new residents but the existing residents with much needed retail services. FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 — 391 10/3/2023 I H W(4 CON 11 NUMO Of �� ci " ;O) APPENDIX: Aopendix 1 : Property Taxes Assess Value Forecast Phasing Condo Apartment Retail Total Year Year Value Value Value Value Proforma 2022 CY1 2023 $0 $0 $0 $0 CY2 2024 $0 $0 $0 $0 CY3 2025 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 2026 $24,129,096 $64,286,511 $3,009,600 $91,425,207 2 2027 $48,740,774 $234,383,999 $3,069,792 $286,194,565 3 2028 $49,715,589 $239,071,679 $3,131,188 $291,918,456 4 2029 $50,709,901 $243,853,113 $3,193,812 $297,756,825 5 2030 $51,724,099 $248,730,175 $3,257,688 $303,711,962 6 2031 $52,758,581 $253,704,778 $3,322,842 $309,786,201 7 2032 $53,813,753 $258,778,874 $3,389,298 $315,981,925 8 2033 $54,890,028 $263,954,451 $3,457,084 $322,301,564 9 2034 $55,987,828 $269,233,540 $3,526,226 $328,747,595 10 2035 $57,107,585 $274,618,211 $3,596,751 $335,322,547 11 2036 $58,249,737 $280,110,575 $3,668,686 $342,028,998 12 2037 $59,414,731 $285,712,787 $3,742,059 $348,869,578 13 2038 $60,603,026 $291,427,043 $3,816,901 $355,846,969 14 2039 $61,815,087 $297,255,584 $3,893,239 $362,963,909 15 2040 $63,051,388 $303,200,695 $3,971,103 $370,223,187 16 2041 $64,312,416 $309,264,709 $4,050,525 $377,627,651 17 2042 $65,598,664 $315,450,003 $4,131,536 $385,180,204 18 2043 $66,910,638 $321,759,003 $4,214,167 $392,883,808 19 2044 $68,248,850 $328,194,183 $4,298,450 $400,741,484 20 2045 $69,613,827 $334,758,067 $4,384,419 $408,756,314 21 2046 $71,006,104 $341,453,228 $4,472,107 $416,931,440 22 2047 $72,426,226 $348,282,293 $4,561,549 $425,270,069 23 2048 $73,874,751 $355,247,939 $4,652,780 $433,775,470 24 2049 $75,352,246 $362,352,898 $4,745,836 $442,450,979 25 2050 $76,859,291 $369,599,956 $4,840,753 $451,299,999 3rand Total: N PV: 4% Escalation 2% 2% 2% Source: Assessed value from FRH, assumes 5% cap rate; Property Tax rates from City of Santa Ana Cap of 4% FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA Property Tax Forecast Total Prop. Tax City Share 1 .08% 1 1.00% $0 $0 $0 $987,392 $3,090,901 $3,152,719 $3,215,774 $3,280,089 $3,345,691 $3,412,605 $3,480,857 $3,550,474 $3,621,484 $3,693,913 $3,767,791 $3,843,147 $3,920,010 $3,998,410 $4,078,379 $4,159,946 $4,243,145 $4,328,008 $4,414,568 $4,502,860 $4,592,917 $4,684,775 $4,778,471 $4,874,040 $95,018,367 $50,055,345 $0 $0 $0 $108,613 $339,999 $346,799 $353,735 $360,810 $368,026 $375,387 $382,894 $390,552 $398,363 $406,330 $414,457 $422,746 $431,201 $439,825 $448,622 $457,594 $466,746 $476,081 $485,603 $495,315 $505,221 $515,325 $525,632 $536,144 $10,452,020 $5,506,139 April 2023 City Council 18 — 392 10/3/2023 THIF CONCORD GROUP Appendix 2 : Property Taxes In -Lieu of VLF New In - Phasing Cumulative Lieu VLF Year Year New Construction 0.0520% Proforma 2022 0 CY1 2023 $0 $0 CY2 2024 $0 $0 CY3 2025 $0 $0 1 2026 $91,425,207 $47,541 2 2027 $286,194,565 $148,821 3 2028 $291,918,456 $151,798 4 2029 $297,756,825 $154,834 5 2030 $303,71 1,962 $157,930 6 2031 $309,786,201 $161,089 7 2032 $315,981,925 $164,31 1 8 2033 $322,301,564 $167,597 9 2034 $328,747,595 $170,949 10 2035 $335,322,547 $174,368 11 2036 $342,028,998 $177,855 12 2037 $348,869,578 $181,412 13 2038 $355,846,969 $185,040 14 2039 $362,963,909 $188,741 15 2040 $370,223,187 $192,516 16 2041 $377,627,651 $196,366 17 2042 $385,180,204 $200,294 18 2043 $392,883,808 $204,300 19 2044 $400,741,484 $208,386 20 2045 $408,756,314 $212,553 21 2046 $416,931,440 $216,804 22 2047 $425,270,069 $221,140 23 2048 $433,775,470 $225,563 24 2049 $442,450,979 $230,075 25 2050 $451,299,999 $234,676 Grand Total: $4,574,958 NPV: 4% $2,410,127 Escalation: 2% Source: Assessed value from FRH, assumes 4.25% cap rate; Property Tax rates from City of Santa An( FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA April 2023 City Council 18 — 393 10/3/2023 Appendix 3: Utility Usage Appendix Phasing Energey Cost Year Year Per Household Proforma 2022 $3,321 CY1 2023 $0 CY2 2024 $0 CY3 2025 $0 1 2026 $3,595 2 2027 $3,666 3 2028 $3,740 4 2029 $3,815 5 2030 $3,891 6 2031 $3,969 7 2032 $4,048 8 2033 $4,129 9 2034 $4,212 10 2035 $4,296 11 2036 $4,382 12 2037 $4,469 13 2038 $4,559 14 2039 $4,650 15 2040 $4,743 16 2041 $4,838 17 2042 $4,935 18 2043 $5,033 19 2044 $5,134 20 2045 $5,237 21 2046 $5,341 22 2047 $5,448 23 2048 $5,557 24 2049 $5,668 25 2050 $5,782 Grand Total: $118,455 NPV: 4% THIF CONCORD GROUP Utility Tax Total Energy Cost Revenue 507 Households 5.5% $1,683,644 $0 $0 $0 $1,822,431 $1,858,879 $1, 896, 057 $1, 933, 978 $1, 972, 658 $2,012,1 1 1 $2,052,353 $2,093,400 $2,135,268 $2,177, 973 $2,221,533 $2,265, 963 $2,31 1,283 $2,357,508 $2,404, 659 $2,452,752 $2,501,807 $2,551,843 $2,602,880 $2, 654, 937 $2, 708, 036 $2,762,197 $2,817,441 $2, 8 73, 790 $2,931,265 $60,056,646 Escalation from 2021 2% 2% (1) Gas at $295, Water at $590, eletric at $1,476, phone at $959 annually FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA $92,600 $0 $0 $0 $100,234 $102,238 $104,283 $106,369 $108,496 $1 10,666 $1 12,879 $115,137 $1 17,440 $1 19,789 $122,184 $124,628 $127,121 $129,663 $132,256 $134,901 $137,599 $140,351 $143,158 $146,022 $148,942 $151,921 $154,959 $158,058 $161,220 $3,210,515 $1,713,508 April 2023 City Council 18 - 394 10/3/2023 Appendix 3: Utility Usage Appendix Phasing Energey Cost Year Year Per Household Proforma 2022 $3,321 CY1 2023 $0 CY2 2024 $0 CY3 2025 $0 1 2026 $3,595 2 2027 $3,666 3 2028 $3,740 4 2029 $3,815 5 2030 $3,891 6 2031 $3,969 7 2032 $4,048 8 2033 $4,129 9 2034 $4,212 10 2035 $4,296 11 2036 $4,382 12 2037 $4,469 13 2038 $4,559 14 2039 $4,650 15 2040 $4,743 16 2041 $4,838 17 2042 $4,935 18 2043 $5,033 19 2044 $5,134 20 2045 $5,237 21 2046 $5,341 22 2047 $5,448 23 2048 $5,557 24 2049 $5,668 25 2050 $5,782 Grand Total: $118,455 NPV: 4% THIF CONCORD GROUP Utility Tax Total Energy Cost Revenue 507 Households 5.5% $1,683,644 $0 $0 $0 $1,822,431 $1,858,879 $1, 896, 057 $1, 933, 978 $1, 972, 658 $2,012,1 1 1 $2,052,353 $2,093,400 $2,135,268 $2,177, 973 $2,221,533 $2,265, 963 $2,31 1,283 $2,357,508 $2,404, 659 $2,452,752 $2,501,807 $2,551,843 $2,602,880 $2, 654, 937 $2, 708, 036 $2,762,197 $2,817,441 $2, 8 73, 790 $2,931,265 $60,056,646 Escalation from 2022 2% 2% (1) Gas at $295, Water at $590, eletric at $1,476, phone at $959 annually FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA $92,600 $0 $0 $0 $100,234 $102,238 $104,283 $106,369 $108,496 $1 10,666 $1 12,879 $115,137 $1 17,440 $1 19,789 $122,184 $124,628 $127,121 $129,663 $132,256 $134,901 $137,599 $140,351 $143,158 $146,022 $148,942 $151,921 $154,959 $158,058 $161,220 $3,210,515 $1,713,508 April 2023 City Council 18 - 395 10/3/2023 rn n 0! O 0 7 O 3 N O N fJ N 0 N 0 THE CONCORD GROUP Q � � N N N N N N 7 Z O (n A W N� 0 �O OO V� (n A W N� O� W V Q` N A W N _ 3 O C O N N NJ N IQ IJ h7 N N N N N IJ IJ IJ IN N N N N IJ IJ IJ IJ N N N tJ N I-< A 0000000000000000000000000000 O (D c Ul A A A A A A A A A A W W W W W W W W W W IJ IJ IJ IJ IJ N N N 0 O O N V 0, Ui A W N O O W V 0, Ui A W N O O 00 V 0, (n A W N EA U1 EA EA EA 'E" 'E" Eft EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA N N N N N N N N _N IJ N N V (n A A W W N N O O �O ,O ,O Do OD Oo V V N N V N V W CO A 'O (n V W 'O Ui V W O 0, W 'O 0, W O 0, N A CT 01 00 N 01 V A N O O W Ln O IJ -�I N M N N O O Gar 163 163 A (n O (n 10 N Ln V V 01 A O A Ln (n N V O 'O (n 'O 'O 0' 'O '0 (n O O O EA N ER b4 '64 EA EA £A EA ER ER EfE '64 '64 EA 01 Efq if' Ef9 Ef3 EA EA EA ER N N N N N -� -� O O O O O �O O �O �O �O 0 00 00 00 O 0O V N V Ui W O 00 N W N V JA N O 00 -A(n W -+ �O VI Q� A N -10 W 10 A C)01 N 1O 0` A Na O �O 10 10 10 O O N A O. 00 A V Cn N �O N N O A N Cn N W �O �O W N A O �O W O -+ CA W A 00 01 V W V W 14 4 OaAN V V N A A Ln WA-4 03 W N (n 01 00 LnO N 0' W (n 0, Ui O - N V N Ui A -+ 00 N O 01 V W A W W O O O O O EA EA N EA EA EA Ef> Ef> EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA (n EA fA (A tit EA EA EA Eft EA (A tit tit 01 W A N N N N O O O C)O 10 10 10 10 10 W 00 00 00 00 00 V 00 V Ui W O 00 Ui W 'O V A IJ O 00 V (n W 0 00 ,O A O Q` N .O O, A N O O �O �O �O O O N A U 00 A V Ln Ln W M O A N (n N W 'O 'O W N A O 'O W O E 0W A 'O 0` V 6, EA EA N �O A 0, W A �O V 00 �O O N �O Ln V A V 0 01 O V (n O O O W EA EA EA EA W WO N V W W 10 EA EA EA Ef> Ef> EA EA EA EA to EA Ef> Ef> EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 00 Ul 01 EA EA EA V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O W O O O V 4A �_ 00 N O 10 10 10 10 10 W W m m A O W V (n W �O V Q` A N 0 N A O 10 W O WN W A 01 O N - O Ui V A V (n 01 EA to W b9 Eft EA EA (f3 ff, EH Eft to Eft EA EA (f3 [f3 EH EA H9 EA EA EA EA [f3 EH EA EA 0 Owl)N -0 J - � W E) -0 �O �O OO Oo V V V D`O0 � 00 V (n W O 00 U, W �O V A N D` N OD V ,O A O 0, N ,O 0, A Na O O O 00 00 O A 00 IQ V IJ 00 O O O A 01 10 00 IQ O A N Ut IJ W 10 10 W A 00 O 10 V IJ 01 1O V W b9 EA EA A N �O A 0, W A �O V 00 �O W W �O O W 1O A 1O (n Q` 00000 FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA Ef3 A Ut O O U1 --I 00 V O <A 2 m V O O C N W N N (0 S o n O 0_ 0 O A H (D 0 EA O (D CD V o C W � O J X Ui N Q 0 C (A J � O (n x Efi o N O m x 0 3 N C V (D W C N 0 C J � O O X o A EA < O 3 C O (D W v CD 0 =. m N O < Q A EA 7 0 CD 00 C N N CL A rt N p 10 X O X� A April 2023 City Council 18-396 10/3/2023 Appendix 5: Retail Sales Tax Phasing Estimated Year Year Sales (1) Proforma 2022 $1,375,000 CYl 2023 $0 CY2 2024 $0 CY3 2025 $0 1 2026 $1,488,344 2 2027 $1,518,111 3 2028 $1,548,473 4 2029 $1,579,443 5 2030 $1,611,032 6 2031 $1,643,252 7 2032 $1,676,117 8 2033 $1,709,640 9 2034 $1,743,832 10 2035 $1,778,709 11 2036 $1,814,283 12 2037 $1,850,569 13 2038 $1,887,580 14 2039 $1,925,332 15 2040 $1,963,839 16 2041 $2,003,115 17 2042 $2,043,178 18 2043 $2,084,041 19 2044 $2,125,722 20 2045 $2,168,236 21 2046 $2,211,601 22 2047 $2,255,833 23 2048 $2,300,950 24 2049 $2,346,969 25 2050 $2,393,908 Grand Total: $47,672,111 NPV: 4% $25,442,648 Escalation 2% (1) $250 revenue per square foot Sales Tax information from City of Santa Ana FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA Sales Tax Sales Tax Sales Tax Revenue Measure X Revenue Measure X Revenue Sales Tax 1.00% 1.50% 1.00% Revenue $13,750 $20,625 $13,750 $48,125 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,883 $22,325 $37,209 $15,181 $22,772 $37,953 $15,485 $23,227 $38,712 $15,794 $0 $15,794 $31,589 $16,110 30 $16,110 $32,221 $16,433 SO $16,433 $32,865 $16,761 SO $16,761 $33,522 $17,096 so $17,096 $ 34,193 $17,438 SO $17,438 $34,877 $17,787 SO $17,787 $35,574 $18,143 so $18,143 $ 36,286 $18,506 so $18,506 $ 37,011 $18,876 SO $18,876 $37,752 $19,253 SO $0 $19,253 $19,638 SO $0 $19,638 $20,031 SO $0 $20,031 $20,432 SO $0 $20,432 $20,840 SO $0 $20,840 $21,257 SO $0 $21,257 $21,682 SO $0 $21,682 $22,116 SO $0 $22,116 $22,558 SO $0 $22,558 $23,009 SO $0 $23,009 $23,470 SO $0 $23,470 $23,939 SO $0 $23,939 $490,471 $68,324 $172,945 $717,990 $257,917 $56,214 $146,085 $328,002 April 2023 City Council 18 - 397 10/3/2023 Appendix 6: City Expenitures Phasing Project Derived Year Year City Expenditures Proforma 2022 $419,482 CY1 2023 $0 CY2 2024 $0 CY3 2025 $0 1 2026 $454,060 2 2027 $463,142 3 2028 $472,404 4 2029 $481,853 5 2030 $491,490 6 2031 $501,319 7 2032 $51 1,346 8 2033 $521,573 9 2034 $532,004 10 2035 $542,644 11 2036 $553,497 12 2037 $564,567 13 2038 $575,858 14 2039 $587,376 15 2040 $599,123 16 2041 $611,106 17 2042 $623,328 18 2043 $635,794 19 2044 $648,510 20 2045 $661,480 21 2046 $674,710 22 2047 $688,204 23 2048 $701,968 24 2049 $716,008 25 2050 $730,328 Grand Total: $14,963,173 NPV: 4% $7,866,829 Escalation from 2022 FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA 2% THIF CONCORD GROUP April 2023 City Council 18 — 398 10/3/2023 Appendix 7: Existing Site Tenants: 515 515 515 525 1901 1971 1971 525 525 525 1901 1971 1971 1971 1971 515 515 515 525 52S 1901 1971 1971 1901 1971 525 1971 525 515 1901 515 525 1901 515 525 515 515 S15 S2S 525 1901 1901 1901 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 Regain, INC. Barnes Accountancy Bancorp Familiar Benefit Equity Colton Capital Corp Mortgage Service Providers Holdings Tom North and North Murray Associates National Traffic Safety Institute Child Guidance Center Child Guidance Center Michael H. Lowenstein, MD OC Association of Mental Health Planned Parenthood Gaston Alvarez Conrad Portillo - O.C. Hypnosis Center Coleman Chavez & Associates Varon St. Clair & Jelenksy Complex Legal Services Pagter and Perry Isaacson Richard D. Pesota BWA Law Group Wall, McCormick Baroldi & Dugan Security Mortgage Lenders OneOC OC Community Associations Institute Knowles & Vacca Joyce Altman Interpreters OC Multi -Housing Service New Century Realtors Corp, Professional Staffing & Marketing Mark S. Wagner, MD Phoenix House Orange County Phoenix House OC Children's Bureau of SoCal Berex VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT FRH Realty LLC 22179.01 Santa Ana, CA Business Management Services Financial Services Financial Services Financial Services Financial Services Financial Services Financial Services Government Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Legal Services Legal Services Legal Services Legal Services Legal Services Legal Services Legal Services Mortgage Lender Non -Profit Non -Profit Private Investigator Professional Business Services Real Estate Real Estate Services Recruiting Agency Rehabilitation Center Rehabilitation Center Rehabilitation Center SoCal Services Technology VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT I H =4 CON 11 c�O I �� ci " ; April 2023 City Council 18 — 399 10/3/2023 CHAPTER 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4.1 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the adoption of feasible mitigation measures to reduce the severity and magnitude of potentially significant environmental impacts associated with project development. The Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) for the proposed Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone EIR (State Clearinghouse No.2006031041) located within the City of Santa Ana (City), includes program and project -specific mitigation measures to reduce the potential environmental effects of the Overlay Zone, as well as the First and Cabrillo Towers Project. Monitoring of the implementation of adopted mitigation measures is required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. The Final EIR for the proposed project provides a list of mitigation measures, and describes the process whereby the mitigation measures would be monitored. Following certification of the Final EIR and approval of this Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) by the City, the mitigation measures included in the Final EIR would be monitored as described in this MMP. It should be noted that because this EIR contained program- and project -level components, two separate MMP tables are presented as part of this MMP for the Overlay Zone and for the First and Cabrillo Towers project. 4.2 PURPOSE The purpose of the proposed Overlay Zone EIR MMP is to ensure compliance with all mitigation measures to mitigate or avoid potentially significant adverse environmental impacts resulting from the proposed project that were identified in the Final EIR. Implementation of this MMP shall be accomplished by the City of Santa Ana. Mitigation measures will be implemented (1) as part of design development of the project, (2) during project construction, or (3) as part of project operations. 4.3 RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES In general, monitoring will consist of demonstrating that mitigation measures were implemented, and that the responsible unit monitored the implementation of the measures. The responsible unit for determining compliance with all mitigation measures will be the City. Monitoring will consist of determining whether ■ The specific issues identified in the mitigation measures were considered in the design development phase ■ Construction contracts included the provisions specified in the mitigation measures ■ The required actions specified in the mitigation measures occurred prior to or during construction ■ Ongoing administrative activities included the provisions identified in the mitigation measures MetrtEasj�acW Ype Overlay Zone (Volume III) 18 — 400 10/3/2023 4-1 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Any concerns between monitors and construction personnel shall be addressed by the City of Santa Ana, Planning Department. 4.4 LIST OF MITIGATION MEASURES As mentioned above, due to the program- and project -level components of this EIR, the MMP has been divided into two parts to address each component separately. The mitigation measures that pertain to implementation of the Overlay Zone and their method of implementation are listed in Table 4-1. The mitigation measures, which include several mitigation measures from the program -level component, that pertain to the First and Cabrillo Towers project are listed in Table 4-2. All project -specific mitigation measures included in the Final EIR for this project would be monitored as described above. The mitigation monitoring matrix on the following pages is formatted to parallel the format of the Executive Summary table contained in the Final EIR. The matrix identifies the required mitigation measures, the time frame for monitoring, and the responsible monitoring agencies. It should be noted that the mitigation measures from Volume I that are contained within Table 4-2 have been modified slightly so as to directly apply to the First and Cabrillo Towers project. The content and action required by each mitigation measure have not been modified. 4-2 City Council 18 — 401 Yby/ 112M23 Ana Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Aesthetics Impact 4.1-3: Implementation of the proposed project would result in new sources of increased daytime glare. MM-0Z4.1-1 Proposed new structures shall be designed to maximize the use of textured or other non -reflective exterior surfaces and non -reflective glass. Planning and Building Agency Project Applicant During Project Design and Construction Impact 4.1-4: Implementation of NW-0Z4.1-2 Al exterior lighting and advertising (including signage) shall be Planning and Project During Project the proposed project would result directed onto the specific location intended for illumination (e.g., parking lots, Building Agency Applicant Design and in new sources of increased driveways, and walkways) and shielded away from adjacent properties and public Construction nighttime light rights-of-waytominimize light spillover onto adjacent areas. MM-OZ4.1-3 Prior to issuance of a Site Development Permit for each specific Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of development project, the applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the City of Santa Building Agency Applicant Site Development Am for review and approval. The plan shall specify the lighting type and Permit placement to ensure that the effects of security and other outdoor lighting are minimized on adjacent uses and do not create spillover effects. The plan shall specifically incorporate the following design features: ■ Al projects shall incorporate project design features to shield light and/or glare from vehicles entering or exiting parking lots and structures that face sensitive uses (e.g., schools, hospitals, senior housing, or other residential properties) by providing barriers so that light from vehicle headlights would not illuminate off - site sensitive uses. All projects shall incorporate project design features to provide landscaping, physical barriers, screening, or other buffers to minimize project -generated illumination from entering off -site areas and to prevent glare or interference with vehicular traffic, in accordance with the City's Municipal Code. Impact 4.1-5: Implementation of NM-0Z4.1-4 Prior to issuance of a building permit each project shall be required Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of the proposed project could result to perform shade and shadow analysis that demonstrates that the project will not Building Agency Applicant a Building Permit in a substantial increase in result in significant impacts according to the following criteria. Shadowing impacts shade/shadows over sensitive in the Overlay Zone are considered significant when shadows would be cast upon uses. potentially sensitive uses during a substantial portion (greater than 50 percent) of the main daylight hours (9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. during the fall, winter, and spring seasons, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. [daylight savings time] during the summer season). Light sensitive uses are those that depend upon light for their operation (e.g., solar panels) or for which solar access is essential for their function ( Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-3 City Council 18 — 402 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program swimming pools). Light-sensitive uses also include public parks, residences, and routinelyuseable outdoor spaces associated with residences (e.g., yards). Air Quality Implementing Impact 4.2-3: Construction and operation of the proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ofpeople. MM-0Z4.2-1 Trash receptacles vitro the Overlay Zone wil be required to have lids that enable convenient collection and loading and will be emptied on a regular basis, in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations for the collection of solid waste. Planning and Building Agency Project Applicant During Operation Impact 4.2-4: Construction MM-0Z4.2-2 The developer shall require by contract specifications that all diesel- Planning and Project Prior to activities associated with the powered equipment used would be retrofitted with after -treatment products (e.g., Building Agency Applicant Construction proposed project would exceed engine catalysts and other technologies available at the time construction South Coast Air Quality commences) when construction activities commence. Contract specifications shall Management District Standards be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be for VOC and NON and would approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff result in a projected air quality MM-OZ4.2-3 The developer shall require by contract specifications that all heavy- Planning and Project Prior to violation. This is considered a duty diesel -powered equipment operating and refueling at the project site would Building Agency Applicant Construction potentially significant impact. use lowNOxdiesel fuel to the extent that it is readily available and cost effective Compliance with the identified (up to 125 percent of the cost of California Air Resources Board diesel) in the project requirement and South Coast Air Basin at the time construction activities commence. This implementation of mitigation requirement shall not apply to diesel -powered trucks traveling to and from the measures MM-0Z4.2 2 through project site. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project MM-OZ4.2 16 would reduce this construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana impact, but not to a less -than- Planning and Building Agency staff. significant level. Therefore, this impact would be considered MM-OZ4.24 The developer shall require by contract specifications that alternative Planning and Project Prior to significant and unavoidable. fuel construction equipment i.e., compressed natural as, liquid etroleum as, � p ( p gP g d►ng Agency Building c Applicant Construction and unleaded gasoline) would be utilized to the extent feasible in the South Coast Air Basin at the time construction activities commence. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the CityofSanta Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. 4-4 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 403 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitfgationMeasures MonitonngParry Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming MM-0Z4.2-5 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Prior to construction equipment engines wil be maintained in good condition and in proper Building Agency Applicant Construction time per manufacturer's specification for the duration of construction. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-6 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Prior to construction related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, Building Agency Applicant Construction and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. NW-0Z4.2-7 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Prior to construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure surrounding the Building Agency Applicant Construction construction site rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. NM-0Z4.2-8 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Prior to construction parking be configured to minimize traffic interference during the Building Applicant Construction construction period and, therefore, reduce idling of traffic. Contract specifications Agency/Public shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be Works approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. NM-0Z4.2-9 The developer shall require by contract specifications that temporary Planning and Project Prior to traffic controls are provided, such as a flagperson, during all phases of Building Applicant Construction construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. Contract specifications shall be Agency/Public included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved Wcd<s by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-10 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Prior to construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system be scheduled to Building Applicant Construction off-peak hours (10.4 M to 4 P.M). Contract specifications shall be included in the Agency/Public proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Works Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nnp (\/nIi imp 111) 4-5 City Council 18 — 404 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitigationMeasures MonitonngParty Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming MM-0Z4.2-11 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Prior to dedicated on -site and off -site left -turn lanes on truck hauling routes be utilized for Building Applicant Construction movement of construction trucks and equipment on site and off site to the extent Agency/Public feasible during construction activities. Contract specifications shall be included in Wo& the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City ofSanta Ana. MM-OZ4.2-12 Upon issuance of building or grading permits, whichever is issued Planning and Project Upon Issuance of earliest; notification shall be mailed to owners and occupants of all developed land Building Agency Applicant Building or Grading uses within 1/4 mile of the Overlay Zone and the individual projects within the Permits Overlay Zone providing a schedule for major construction activities that wrll occur through the duration of the construction period. In addition, the notification wi l include the identification and contact number for a community liaison and designated construction manager that would be available on site to monitor construction activities. The construction manager shall be responsible for complying with all project requirements related to PMro generation. The construction manager writ be located at the on -site construction office during construction hours for the duration of all construction activities. Contract information for the community liaison and construction manager wrll be located at the construction office, City Hall, the police department, and a sign on site. MM-OZ4.2-13 As required by South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule Planning and Project During Grading, 403—Fugitive Dust, all construction activities that are capable of generating Building Agency Applicant Construction and fugitive dust are required to implement dust control measures during each phase Project of project development to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the Implementation ambient air. These measures include the following. ■ Uniting the amount ofarea disturbed during site grading to 10 acres per day ■ Application ofsoil stabilizers to inactive construction areas ■ Quickreplacement ofground cover in disturbed areas ■ Watering ofexposed surfaces three times daily ■ Watering of all unpaved haul roads three times daily • Covering all stockpiles with tarp ■ Reduction ofvehicle speed on unpaved roads ■ Post signs on site, limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less ■ Sweep streets adjacent to the project site at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads 4-6 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 405 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitigationMeasures MonitonngParty Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming ■ Cover or have water applied to the exposed surface of all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads to wash offtrucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip NW-0Z4.2-14 The developer shall require by contract specifications that the Planning and Project Prior to architectural coating (paint and primer) products used would have a VOC rating of Building Agency Applicant Construction 100 grams per liter or less. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. NM-0Z4.2-15 The developer shall require by contract specifications that materials Planning and Project Prior to that do not require painting be used during construction to the extent feasible. Building Agency Applicant Construction Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-16 The developer shall require by contract specifications that pre- Planning and Project Prior to painted construction materials be used to the extent feasible. Contract Building Agency Applicant Construction specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. Biological Resources Impact 4.3-1: Implementation of NW-0Z4.3-1 To ensure that avian species of concern, protected migratory Planning and Project Prior to and during the proposed project would not species (e.g., NWA� or raptors species are not injured or disturbed by Building Applicant Construction result in a potential reduction in construction in the vicinity of nesting habitat, the project applicant shall implement Agency/CDFG nesting opportunities for resident the following measures: and migratory avian species of 1. When feasible, all tree removal shall occur between August 30 and special concern. February 15 to avoid the breeding season of any raptor species that could be using the area, and to discourage hawks from nesting in the vicinity of an upcoming construction area. This period may be modified with the authorization of the DFQ or if it is not feasible to remove trees outside this window then, prior to the beginning of mass grading, including grading for major infrastructure improvements, during the period between February 15 and August 30, all trees within 350 feet of any wading or earthmoving Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nnp (\/nIi imp 111) 4-7 City Council 18 — 406 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitigationMeasures MonitonngParry Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming activity shall be surveyed for active raptor nests by a qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to disturbance. If active raptor nests are found, and the site is within 350 feet of potential construction activity, a fence shall be erected around the tree(s) at a distance of up to 350 feet, depending on the species, from the edge of the canopy to prevent construction disturbance and intrusions on the nest area. The appropriate buffer shall be determined by the City in consultation with CDFG. 2. No construction vehicles shall be permitted within restricted areas (i.e., raptor protection zones), unless directly related to the management or protection ofthe legally protected species. 3. In the event that a nest is abandoned, despite efforts to minimize disturbance, and if the nestlings are still alive, the developer shall contact CDFG and, subject to CDFG approval, fund the recovery and hacking (controlled release ofcaptive reared young) ofthe nestling(s). 4. If a legally protected species nest is located in a tree designated for removal, the removal shall be deferred until after August 30th, or until the adults and young of the year are no longer dependent on the nest site as determined by a qualified biologist. Cultural Resources Impact 4.4-1: Redevelopment of MM-0Z4.4-1 The City of Santa Ana shall require as part of the environmental Planning and Project During sites within the Overlay Zone review of development projects within the Overlay Zone that impacts to potentially Building Agency Applicant environmental could result in the demolition or significant historic resources be considered. If any existing structures on a reviewoffuture major modification of historically- proposed development site are at or approaching 50+ years of age at the time of projects aged structures which have not CEQA review, the City shall consult with a qualified historian as to the potential yet been evaluated to determine significance ofthe structure and develop mitigation measures as necessary. their significance as defined by Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, and this would be considered a significant impact. 4-8 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 407 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone Component Implementing Impacts MitigationMeasures MonitoringParry Parry MitigationTiming Impact 4.4-2: Implementation of NM-0Z4.4-2 Due to the lack of cultural resource studies for the project site and in Planning and Project During the proposed project has the order to avoid damaging any unidentified cultural resources, a qualified Building Agency Applicant Construction potential to cause a substantial archaeologist should be retained to monitor any significant ground -disturbing adverse change in the significance activities in undeveloped areas widen the Overlay Zone, and any deep (10' or of an archaeological resource deeper) ground -disturbing activities in all areas ofthe OverlayZone. pursuant to Section 15064.5 ofthe CEQA Guidelines, and this would XM-0Z4.4-3 In the event that archeological resources are unearthed during Planning and Project During be considered a significant impact. project subsurface activities, all earth -disturbing work within a 200-meter radius Building Agency Applicant Construction must be temporarily suspended or redirected until an archeologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, workin the area may resume. Impact 4.4-3: Implementation of MM-0Z4.44 In the event that paleontological resources are unearthed during Planning and Project During the proposed project has the subsurface construction activities, all earth -disturbing work within a 100-meter Building Agency Applicant Construction potential to directly or indirectly radius of the find must be temporarily suspended or redirected until a destroy a unique paleontological paleontologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find After the find resource or site, or unique has been appropriatelymitigated, workin the area mayresume. geologic feature and this would be considered a significant impact. Impact 4.4-4: Construction MM-0Z4.4-5 If human remains are unearthed, State Health and Safety Code Planning and Project During activities under the proposed Section 7050.5 require that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Building Applicant Construction project could result in the coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Agency/NAHC disturbance of human remains Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be of interred outside of formal Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to notify the Native American cemeteries. Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC wr7l then contact the most likely descendant of the deceased Native American, who w-M then serve as consultant on how to proceed with the remains. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nnp (\/nIi imp 111) 4-9 City Council 18 — 408 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Geology and Soils Impact 4.5-1: Implementation of MM-0Z4.5-1 During project -specific building design of f rture development in the Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of the proposed Overlay Zone could Overlay Zone, site -specific geotechnical studies shall be conducted under the Building Agency Applicant Pernnits/During expose people or structures to direct supervision of a California Registered Engineering Geologist or licensed Project Design potential substantial adverse geotechnical engineer to assess detailed seismic, geological, soil, and effects, including the risk of loss, groundwater conditions at each construction site and develop recommendations to injury, or death involving strong prevent or abate any identified hazards. The report shall specify foundation seismic groundshaking. recommendations to ensure issues associated with underlying soils are addressed. Construction of the project shall comply with all recommendations in the geotechnical report. The study shall follow applicable recommendations of CDMG Special Publication 117 where applicable and shall include, but not necessarilybe limited to ■ Determination of the locations of any suspected fault traces and anticipated ground acceleration at the building site ■ Potential for displacement caused by seismically induced shaking liquefaction, differential soil settlement, expansive and compressible soils, or other earth movements or soil constraints ■ Evaluation of depth to oundwater Impact 4.5-5: Future development MMmOZ4.5-2 Developers within the Overlay Zone shall conduct expansion index Planning and Project Prior to Project under the proposed Overlay Zone tests in accordance with UBC Standard 18-2 prior to project construction. The Building Agency Applicant Construction could be located on expansive design of structural elements of future projects shall include recommendations set soil. forth by the expansion indextests. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact 4.6-2: Implementation of MM-0Z4.6-1 For fiihue residential uses that are developed under the Overlay Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of the proposed project could result Zone within 500 feet of an existing freeway, a health risk assessment W) for Building Agency Applicant Permits/During in the exposure of future residents diesel exhaust shall be prepared. Recommendations contained within the HRA Project Design in the Overlay Zone to diesel shall be implemented in project design. exhaust emissions, which could pose a significant hazard. 4-10 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 409 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitigationMeasures MonitoringParry Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming Impact 4.6-3: Construction MM-0Z4.6-2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits on any project site, the site Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of activities associated with developer(s) shall: Building Agency Applicant Grading Permits implementation of the proposed ■ Investigate the project site to determine whether it or immediately adjacent Overlay Zone could result in the areas have a record of hazardous material contamination via the preparation of release of hazardous materials to a preliminary environmental site assessment (ESA), which shall be submitted to the environment through the City for review. If contamination is found the report shall characterize the reasonably foreseeable upset and site according to the nature and extent of contamination that is present before accident conditions. development activities precede at that site. ■ If contamination is determined to be on site, the City, in accordance with appropriate regulatory agencies, shall determine the need for further investigation and/or remediation of the soils conditions on the contaminated site. If firrther investigation or remediation is required, it shall be the responsibility of the site developer(s) to complete such investigation and/or remediation prior to construction ofthe project. ■ Ifremediation is required as identified by the local oversight agency, it shall be accomplished in a manner that reduces risk to below applicable standards and shall be completed prior to issuance ofany occupancypern its. MM-OZ4.6-3 In the event that previously unknown or unidentified soil and/or Planning and Project During construction groundwater contamination that could present a threat to human health or the Building Agency Applicant environment is encountered during construction of the proposed project, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the contamination shall cease immediately. If contamination is encountered, a Risk Management Plan shall be prepared and implemented that (1) identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk each contaminant would pose to human health and the environment during construction and post -development and (2) describes measures to be taken to protect workers, and the public from exposure to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation, long-term monitoring, post - development maintenance or access limitations, or some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of contamination, if any, appropriate agencies shall be notified (e.g., City of Santa Ana Fire Department). If needed, a Site Health and Safety Plan that meets Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements shall be prepared and in place prior to commencement of work in any contaminated area. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nnp (\/nIi imp 111) 4-11 City Council 18 — 410 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitigationMeasures MonitonngParty Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming Impact 4.6-7: Implementation of MM-0Z4.64 For development of structures that exceed 200 feet in height above Planning and Project Prior to the proposed project could result ground level at a development site, Applicants shall file a Notice of Proposed Building Agency/ Applicant Construction in a safety hazard for people Construction or Alteration with the FAATAAForm 7460-1). Following the FAA's FAA(ALUC residing or worlang in the project Aeronautical Study ofthe project, projects must comply with conditions of approval area. imposed or recommended by the FAA. Subsequent to the FAAfindings, the City shall refer the project to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County for consistency analysis. Impact 4.6-8: Implementation of MM-0Z4.6-5 Prior to initiation of construction activities, any development widen Public Works Project Prior WDuring the Overlay Zone could interfere the Overlay Zone shall have a completed traffic control plan, prepared by the Applicant Construction with an adopted emergency developer that willbe implemented during construction activities. This may include, response plan or emergency but is not limited to, the maintenance of at least one unobstructed lane in both evacuation plan. directions on surrounding roadways. At any time only a single lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic signal, signal carriers (i.e., flagpersons), or other appropriate traffic controls to allowtravel in both directions. lfconstruction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer shall provide appropriate signage indicating alternative routes. MM-OZ4.6-6 The City Planning Department shall consult with the Santa Ana Planning and Planning and Prior to/During Police Department and the Santa Ana Fire Department to disclose temporary Building Building Agency Construction closures and alternative travel routes in order to ensure adequate access for Agency/Police emergency vehicles when construction of future projects would result in temporary Dept./Fire Dept. land or roadway closures. MM-OZ4.6-7 The Santa Ana Fire Department, in consultation with other Fire Dcpt./Police Fire Department Prior to occupancy applicable City Departments (e.g., Police), shall update their Emergency Dept./Planning and ofthe first project Preparedness Plan prior to occupancy of the first project developed under the Building Agency developed under Overlay Zone, to address potential for accidental release of hazardous materials the Overlay Zone that may be used, stored, and/or transported in association with operation of project implementation. 4-12 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 411 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Hydrology and Water Quality Impact 4.7-1: Implementation of MM-0Z4.7-1 In order to comply with the 2003 DAMP, future development projects Public Works Project Prior to Issuance of the proposed Overlay Zone would in the Overlay Zone shall prepare Storm Drain Plans, Stormwater Pollution Applicant Permits not violate water quality Prevention Plans (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) standards, waste discharge, or conforming to the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System otherwise substantially degrade (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or Environmental water quality. Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. a. A SWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements ofeach phase ofthe development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the project is completed. The SWPPP shall include treatment and disposal of all dewatering operation flows, and for nuisance flows during construction. b. A WQMP shall be prepared, maintained, and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program. The plan shall incorporate water qualitymeasures for all improved phases ofthe project. c Location ofthe BMPs shall not be within the public right-of-way. Impact 4.7-4: Future development NM-0Z4.7-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, fiiture development projects in Public Works Project Prior to Issuance of in the Overlay Zone could alter the the Overlay Zone shall submit a Hydrology and Hydraulic Study to the Public Applicant Grading Permits existing drainage pattern and Works Department for review and approval. Ifexisting facilities are not adequate to potentially result in increased handle runoff that may be generated by the proposed development, then the downstream flooding through the applicant shall propose feasible remedies to assure that adequate drainage addition of impervious surfaces, or facilities will be available prior to issuance of occupancy pen -nits. The applicant exceeding the capacity of existing may propose storm drain improvements to be constructed in order to meet project or planned stormwater drainage needs. If necessary storm drain upgrades cannot be implemented prior to systems. issuance of occupancy permits, on site detention facilities or other methods acceptable to the City shall be included with new development projects to ensure that post -construction mnoffdoes not exceed pre -development quantities. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-13 City Council 18 — 412 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Noise Impact 4.9-1: Construction 1VM OZ 4.9-1 Construction activities shall be limited to the following general Planning and Project During activities associated with the restrictions. In the event that there is a conflict between the City of Santa Ana Building Agency Applicant Construction proposed project would generate Municipal Code and the City of Tustin Municipal Code, the more restrictive noise levels that exceed the noise measures shallbe applied: standards established by the City . AD construction activity within the City shall be conducted in accordance with ofSanta Ana Municipal Code. Section 18-314(e) ofthe Cityof Santa Ana MunicipalCode. ■ All construction activity within 200 feet of the City of Tustin Border shall be conducted in accordance with Section 4617(e) of the City of Tustin Municipal Code. MMOZ 4.9-2 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that the Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of following construction best management practices (BMPs) be implemented by Building Agency Applicant Grading Permit contractors to reduce construction noise levels: ■ Twn weeks prior to the commencement of construction, notification must be provided to surrounding land uses within 1,000 feet of a project site disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types ofactivities that would be occurring throughout the duration ofthe construction period ■ Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffled according to industry standards and be in good worming condition. ■ Place noise -generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas awayfromsensitive uses, where feasible. ■ Schedule high noise -producing activities between the hours of 8:00 AA/1 and 5:00 P.M. to minimize disruption on sensitive uses. ■ Implement noise attenuation measures to the extent feasible, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationaryconstruction noise sources. ■ Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible. ■ Construction -related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes. ■ Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent. If the City 4-14 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 413 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitigationMeasures MonitonngParry Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming or the job superintendent receives a complaint, the superintendent shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action taken to the reporting party. ■ Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. NM OZ 4.9-3 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of construction staging areas along with the operation of earthmoving equipment Building Agency Applicant Grading Permit within the project area would be located as far away from vibration and noise sensitive sites as possible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading pen -nit NM OZ 4.9-4 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away from Building Agency Applicant Grading Perarit residential streets to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the Cityprior to issuance ofa grading permit. Impact 4.9-2: Operation of the NM OZ 4.9-5 Where future residential uses would be construction in areas Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of proposed project could expose exposed to noise levels greater than 60 dBACNEL, prior to issuance of building Building Agency Applicant Building Permits noise -sensitive land uses to noise permits, building plans shall reflect the construction ofnoise barriers around patios levels that exceed the standards and balconies. The barriers shall be constructed ofmaterials that provide a surface established by the City of Santa density of at least four pounds per square foot and shall be continuous, without Ana General Plan. gaps or gates. The height of the barriers shall be sufficient to reduce the exterior noise levels to a CNELof 65 dBAor less, and shall be determined by a qualified acousticalconsultant as part ofthe final engineering design ofthe project. MMOZ 4.9-6 Prior to issuance of building pemuts, building plans shall specify the Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of STC rating of windows and doors for all residential land uses. Window and door Building Agency Applicant Building Permits ratings shall be sufficient to reduce the interior noise level to a CNELof45 dBAor less, and shall be determined by a qualified acoustical consultant as part of the final engineering design ofthe project. NM OZ 4.9-7 The developer shall provide proper shielding for all new HVAC Planning and Project During Project systems used by the proposed residential and mixed use buildings to achieve an Building Agency Applicant Design and attenuation of 15 dBAat 50 feet from the equipment. Construction Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nnp (\/nIi imp 111) 4-15 City Council 18 — 414 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Public Services Impact 4.11-3: Operation of the WM OZ4.11-1 Individual project developers shall pay school impact fees prior to Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of proposed project would require the issuance ofoccupancypermits. Building Agency Applicant OccupancyPernuts new or physically altered facilities to accommodate additional students in Tustin Unified School District (TUSD) schools. This is considered a potentially significant impact. Transportation/Traffic Impact 4.12-6: The proposed MM-0Z4.12-1 As part of the project, the City of Santa Ana and the project Public Works Public Works During project would not conflict with sponsors shall work with the transit providers to implement various transit -related implementation of adopted policies, plans, or measures to improve and expand bus system service within the Overlay Zone. the project programs supporting alternative These measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: transportation. ■ Adding bus stops to the OverlayZone along existing and proposed roadways ■ Changing bus service headways to respond to increased demand ■ Changing bus service destinations to respond to changing demand ■ Adding local shuttle service for employees and patrons ofthe OverlayZone The details of bus service improvements shall be determined in coordination with OCTA The following recommendations would help encourage public transit patronage for project -related trips: ■ Bus Stop Locations —Relocation of existing bus stops and the provision of additional bus stops should be considered to accommodate transit users at convenient locations. ■ Days of Operation —The City should work with OCTAto consider changes to route times to serve nighttime and weekend project visitors and employees. ■ Headway —The City should work with OCTA to review route headways to determine if it would be appropriate to reduce them to accommodate transit riders within the Overlay Zone. 4-16 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 415 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitigationMeasures MonitonngParry Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming Impact 4.12-7: Implementation of WM OZ4.12-2 Future development within the proposed Overlay Zone shall Public Works Project Prior to Issuance of the proposed project would cause prepare separate traffic studies, specific to the individual projects that are Applicant Building Permits an increase in traffic which is proposed. The traffic studies for future projects shall be prepared by a qualified substantial in relation to the traffic engineer of the Cry's choosing. Further, and as determined by the traffic existing traffic load and capacity of studies, the above identified improvement measures shall be implemented as a the street system. condition of the proposed development, either through the direct construction of improvements by the project applicant or through payment ofa fee, as required by the program detailed in MM-OZ4.124. MM-0Z4.12-3 The City of Santa Ana Planning Department, in cooperation with Planning and Planning and Ongoing the Department ofPublic Works, shall monitor the traffic signals within the Overlay Building Building Zone Study Area once every five years to ensure that traffic signal timing is Agency/Public Agency/Public optimized. Worms Works NW-0Z4.12-4 The City of Santa Ana shall institute a program for systematic Planning and Planning and During mitigation of impacts as development proceeds within the Overlay Zone to ensure Building Building Implementation of mitigation of the individual improvements. The program shall prescribe the method Agency/Public Agency/Public Proj ect ofparticipation in the mitigation programby individualprojects and guide the timely Works Works implementation of the mitigation measures. The program should include the following elements: ■ Afirnding and improvement program should be established to identify financial resources adequate to construct all identified mitigation measures in a timely basis. ■ The program should allow for acquisition of entire properties including business relocation where necessary to construct mitigation measures. Funds derived from sale of surplus acquired properties should be returned to the program. ■ All properties that redevelop within the Overlay Zone should participate in the program on a fair share per new development trip basis. The fair share should be based upon the total cost of all identified mitigation measures, divided by the peak hour trip generation increase forecast. This rate per peak hour trip should be imposed upon the incremental traffic growth for any new development within the OverlayZone. ■ The program should include resources to conduct preliminary engineering studies to complete alignment studies and project specific environmental clearances for Tustin Avenue at 17th Street and at 4th Street. ■ The program should raise funds from full development of the Overlay Zone to Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nnp (\/nIi imp 111) 4-17 City Council 18 — 416 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay MitigationMeasures MonitonngParty Zone Component Implementing Parry MitigationTiming fund all identified mitigation measures. ■ The program should monitor phasing development of the Overlay Zone and defer or elimniate improvements if the densities pemritted in the Overlay Zone are not occurring. ■ Program phasing should be monitored through preparation of specific project tragic impact studies for any project that is expected to include more than 100 dwelling units or 100,000 square feet of non-residential development. Traffic impact studies should use traffic generation rates that are deemed to be most appropriate for the actual development proposed. ■ The program should initiate project development to assure timely completion of the improvements identified to be needed for the First and Cabrillo Towers project by 2010 or as soon after as practically feasible. ■ Properties within Santa Ana and within one-half mffe of the Overlay Zone that redevelop to result in higher traffic generation should also participate in the program to insure equity. ■ The program should provide for full construction of projects outside of Santa Ana, ifthe OverlayZone willcreate a traffic impact based upon the CHIP. ■ The program should provide fair share contribution to construction costs of other improvements outside of the Overlay Zone if they are identified in this traffic study but they are not impacted as defined by the CHIP. ■ The fair share contribution would presume participation by other developments outside of the City of Santa Ana (generally within the City of Tustin) in proportion to traffic growth at the affected sites. ■ Traffic impact studies for firtm projects shall be prepared by a qualified traffic engineer approved or retained by the City. ■ The City may elect to implement appropriate mitigation measures as a condition of approval of the proposed developments, where appropriate. All or part of the costs of these improvements may be considered to be a negotiated credit toward the program, however the Program must be administered in a manner that assures that it can fiord necessary improvements to maintain adequate level of service at all intersections within this study. If funding of priority improvements cannot be assured, credit for construction of lower priority improvements may not be assured or may be postponed until more Program funds are available. ■ Traffic studies for figure developments within the Overlay Zone must also use 4-18 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 417 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone Component Implementing Impacts MitigationMeasures MonitonngParty Parry MitigationTiming trip generation rates which are specific for these projects and are approved by the City. The traffic consultant preparing traffic studies for specific projects in the Overlay Zone must use City -approved hip generation rates specific to these projects. These studies are subject to Cityreview. Utilities and Service Systems Impact 4.13-4: Implementation of NW-0Z4.13-1 The developer is required to undertake a site -specific sewer Public Project During Design and the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay evaluation, including flowmonitoring and modeling, maybe required as part of the Works/orange Applicant Prior to Zone could require the project design to detennine the adequacy ofthe existing sewer pipe capacity in the County Sanitation Implementation of construction of new or expanded affected project area lines. District the proposed wastewater conveyance systems, project the construction of which would not cause significant environmental effects. Impact 4.13-8: Implementation of NW-0Z4.13-2 The project shall implement energy conservation measures (such Planning and Project Prior to Issuance of the Overlay Zone could increase as energy -efficient lighting and micro processor controlled HVAC equipment) to Building Agency Applicant Building Permits the demand for electricity and gas, reduce the demand for electricity and natural gas. The energy conservation but would not require or result in measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed or if the construction of new energy current technologybecomes obsolete through replacement. production or transmission facilities, the construction of which could cause a significant environmental impact. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nnp (\/nIi imp 111) 4-19 City Council 18 — 418 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Impact 4.1-3: Implementation of the proposed project would result in new sources of increased daytime glare. Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: NJM-0Z4.1-1 Proposed new structures shall be designed to maximize the use of textured or other non -reflective exterior surfaces and non -reflective glass. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Planning and Building Agency Project Applicant During Project Design and Construction Impact 4.1-4: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project would result NJM-0Z4.1-2 All exterior lighting and advertising (including signage) shall be Planning and Project Applicant During Design and in new sources of increased directed onto the specific location intended for illumination (e.g., parking lots, Building Agency Construction nighttime light driveways, and walk)Aays) and shielded away from adjacent properties and public rights -of -way to minimize light spillover onto adjacent areas. MM-0Z4.1-3 Prior to issuance of a permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of plan to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The plan shall specify the Building Agency Site Development lighting type and placement to ensure that the effects of security and other outdoor Permit lighting are minimized on adjacent uses and do not create spillover effects. The plan shall specifically incorporate the following design features: ■ Design features to shield light and/or glare from vehicles entering or exiting parking lots and structures that face sensitive uses (e.g., schools, hospitals, senior housing, or other residential properties) by providing barriers so that light fromvehicle headlights would not illuminate off -site sensitive uses. ■ Design features to provide landscaping, physical barriers, screening, or other buffers to minimize project -generated illumination from entering off -site areas and to prevent glare or interference with vehicular traffic, in accordance with the CiVs Municipal Code. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Air Quality Impact 4.2-5: Construction and Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: operation of the proposed project MM-0Z4.2-1 Trash receptacles within the project area willbe required to have lids Planning and Project Applicant During Operation would not create objectionable that enable convenient collection and loading and wr71 be emptied on a regular Building Agency odors affecting a substantial basis, in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations for the collection of solid 4-20 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 419 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitonngParry Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming number ofpeople. waste. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Impact 4.2-6: Construction Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: activities associated with the MM-0Z4.2-2 The developer shall require by contract specifications that all diesel- Planning and Project Applicant Prior to proposed project would exceed powered equipment used would be retrofitted with after -treatment products (e.g., Building Agency Construction South Coast Air Quality engine catalysts and other technologies available at the time construction Management District Standards commences) when construction activities commence. Contract specifications shall for VOC and NON and would be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be result in a projected air quality approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. violation. This is considered a potentially significant impact. MM-0Z4.2-3 The developer shall require by contract specifications that all heavy- Planning and Project Applicant Prior to duty diesel -powered equipment operating and refueling at the project site would Building Agency Construction use low NOXdiesel fuel to the extent that it is readily available and cost effective (up to 125 percent of the cost of Califomia Air Resources Board diesel) in the South Coast Air Basin at the time construction activities commence. This requirement shall not apply to diesel -powered trucks traveling to and from the project site. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-4 The developer shall require by contract specifications that alternative Planning and Project Applicant Prior to fuel construction equipment (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, Building Agency Construction and unleaded gasoline) would be utilized to the extent feasible in the South Coast Air Basin at the time construction activities commence. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-5 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Applicant Prior to construction equipment engines wil be maintained in good condition and in proper Building Agency Construction tune per manufacturer's specification for the duration of construction. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff MM-0Z4.2-6 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Applicant Prior to construction -related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, Building Agency Construction and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than five Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nnp (\/nIi imp 111) 4-21 City Council 18 — 420 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers I MonitonngParry Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming minutes. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-7 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Applicant Prior to construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure surrounding the Building Agency Construction construction site rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-8 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Applicant Prior to construction parking be configured to minimise traffic interference during the Building Construction construction period and, therefore, reduce idling of traffic. Contract specifications Agency/Public shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be Works approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-9 The developer shall require by contract specifications that temporary Planning and Project Applicant Prior to traffic controls are provided, such as a flag person, during all phases of Building Construction construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. Contract specifications shall be Agency/Public included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved Works by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-10 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Applicant Prior to construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system be scheduled to Building Construction off-peak hours (10 AM to 4 P.M.). Contract specifications shall be included in the Agency/Public proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Works Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-11 The developer shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Applicant Prior to dedicated on -site and off -site left -turn lanes on truck hauling routes be utilized for Building Construction movement ofconstruction trucks and equipment on site and offsite to the extent Agency/Public feasible during construction activities. Contract specifications shall be included in Works the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-12 Upon issuance of building or grading permits, whichever is issued Planning and Project Applicant Upon Issuance of earliest; notification shall be mailed to owners and occupants of all developed land Building Agency Building or Grading uses within '/a mile of the Overlay Zone and the individual projects within the Permits Overlay Zone providing a schedule for major construction activities that w1 occur through the duration of the construction period. In addition, the notification will 4-22 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 421 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers I MonitonngParry Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming include the identification and contact number for a community liaison and designated construction manager that would be available on site to monitor construction activities. The construction manager shall be responsible for complying with all project requirements related to PM10 generation. The construction manager wr71 be located at the on -site construction office during construction hours for the duration of all construction activities. Contract information for the community liaison and construction manager wr7l be located at the construction office, CityHall, the police department, and a sign on site. MM-0Z4.2-13 As required by South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule Planning and Project Applicant During grading, 403—Fugitive Dust, all construction activities that are capable of generating Building Agency construction and fiotive dust are required to implement dust control measures during each phase project ofproject development to reduce the amount ofparticulate matter entrained in the Implementation ambient air. These measures include the following: ■ Limiting the amount ofarea disturbed during site grading to 10 acres per day ■ Application ofsoil stabilizers to inactive construction areas ■ Quickreplacement ofground cover in disturbed areas • Watering ofexposed surfaces three times daily ■ Watering ofallunpaved haul roads three times daily ■ Covering all stockpiles with tarp ■ Reduction ofvehicle speed on unpaved roads ■ Post signs on site, linuting tragic to 15 miles per hour or less ■ Sweep streets adjacent to the project site at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads ■ Cover or have water applied to the exposed surface of all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas ■ histallwheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads to wash offtrucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip MM-0Z4.2-14 The developer shall require by contract specifications that the Planning and Project Applicant Prior to architectural coating (paint and primer) products used would have a VOC rating of Building Agency Construction 100 grams per liter or less. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-23 City Council 18 — 422 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers I MonitoringParty Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming NW-0Z4.2-15 The developer shall require by contract specifications that materials Planning and Project Applicant Prior to that do not require painting be used during construction to the extent feasible. Building Agency Construction Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-0Z4.2-16 The developer shall require by contract specifications that pre- Planning and Project Applicant Prior to painted construction materials be used to the extent feasible. Contract Building Agency Construction specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional feasible mitigation is available. Biological Resources Impact 4.3-1: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project would not NW-0Z4.3-1 To ensure that avian species of concern, protected migratory Planning and Project Applicant Prior to and during result in a potential reduction in species (e.g., MBTA� or raptors species are not injured or disturbed by Budding Agency/ Project nesting opportunities for resident construction in the vicinity of nesting habitat, the project applicant shall implement CDFG Construction and migratory avian species of the following measures: special concern. 1. When feasible, all tree removal shall occur between August 30 and February 15 to avoid the breeding season ofanyraptor species that could be using the area, and to discourage hawks fromnesting in the vicinityofan upcoming construction area. This period maybe modified with the authorization ofthe DFQ or ifit is not feasible to remove trees outside this windowthen, prior to the beginning ofmass grading, including grading for major infrastructure improvements, during the period between February 15 and August 30, all trees widen 350 feet ofany grading or earthmoving activity shall be surveyed for active raptor nests bya qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to disturbance. Ifactive raptor nests are found, and the site is within 350 feet of potentialconstruction activity, a fence shall be erected around the tree(s) at a distance ofup to 350 feet, depending on the species, fromthe edge ofthe canopy to prevent construction disturbance and intrusions on the nest area. The appropriate buffer shall be determined by the City in consultation with CDFG. 2. No construction vehicles shall be permitted widen restricted areas (i.e., raptor 4-24 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 423 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitonngParry Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming protection zones), unless directlyrelated to the management or protection of the legallyprotected species. 3. In the event that a nest is abandoned, despite efforts to minimize disturbance, and ifthe nestlings are still alive, the developer shall contact CDFG and, subj ect to CDFG approval, fund the recovery and hacking (controlled release ofcaptive reared young) ofthe nestling(s). 4. Ifa legally protected species nest is located in a tree designated for removal, the removal shall be deferred until after August 30th, or until the adults and young ofthe year are no longer dependent on the nest site as determined bya qualified biologist. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Cultural Resources Impact 4.4-1: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project has the NW-0Z4.4-2 Due to the lack ofculturalresource studies for the project site and in Planning and Project Applicant During potential to cause a substantial order to avoid damaging any unidentified cultural resources, a qualified Building Agency Construction adverse change in the significance archaeologist should be retained to monitor any significant ground -disturbing of an archaeological resource activities in undeveloped areas within the Overlay Zone, and any deep (10' or pursuant to Section 15064.5 ofthe deeper) ground -disturbing activities in all areas ofthe OverlayZone. CEQAGuidelines. MM-0Z4.4-3 In the event that archeological resources are unearthed during Planning and Project Applicant During project subsurface activities, all earth -disturbing work within a 100-meter radius Building Agency Construction must be temporarily suspended or redirected until an archeologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Impact 4.4-2: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project has the NW-0Z4.4-4 In the event that paleontological resources are unearthed during Planning and Project Applicant During Potential to directly or indirectly subsurface construction activities, all earth -disturbing work within a 100-meter Building Agency Construction destroy a unique paleontological radius of the find must be temporarily suspended or redirected until a resource or site, or unique paleontologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find. After the find geologic feature. has been appropriatelymitigated, workin the area mayresume. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-25 City Council 18 — 424 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitonngParty Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Impact 4.4-3: Construction Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: activities under the proposed W-0Z4.4-5 If human remains are unearthed, State Health and Safety Code Planning and Project Applicant During project could result in the Section 7050.5 require that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Building Construction disturbance of human remains coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Agency/NAHC interred outside of formal Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be of cemeteries. Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC will then contact the most likely descendant of the deceased Native American, who will then serve as consultant on howto proceed with the remains. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Geology and Soils Impact 4.5-1: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project could expose MM-0Z4.5-1 A site -specific geotechnical study shall be conducted under the Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of People and/or structures to direct supervision of a California. Registered Engineering Geologist or licensed Building Agency Grading potentially substantial adverse geotechnical engineer to assess detailed seismic, geological, soil, and Permit/During effects resulting from strong groundwater conditions and develop recommendations to prevent or abate any Project Design seismic groundshaking. identified hazards. The report shall specify foundation recommendations to ensure issues associated with underlying soils are addressed. Construction of the project shall comply with all recommendations in the geotechnical report. The study shall follow applicable recommendations of CDMG Special Publication 117 where applicable and shall include, but not necessarily be limited to the following: ■ Determination of the locations of any suspected fault traces and anticipated ground acceleration at the building site ■ Potential for displacement caused by seismically induced shaking, liquefaction, differential soil settlement, expansive and compressible soils, or other earth movements or soil constraints ■ Evaluation ofdepth to groundwater Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. 4-26 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 425 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and I MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitonngParry Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming Impact 4.5-5: The proposed Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: development could be located on MM-0Z4.5-2 The developer shall conduct expansion index tests in accordance Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Project expansive soil. with UBC Standard 18-2 prior to project construction. The design of structural Building Agency Construction elements shall include recommendations set fords bythe expansion indextests. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: 1Vo additional mitigation is required. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact 4.6-2: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project would not MM-0Z4.6-1 A health risk assessment (HRA) for diesel exhaust shall be Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of result in the exposure of firture prepared. Recommendations contained within the HRA shall be implemented in Building Agency Pemni&During residents to diesel exhaust project design. Project Design emissions, which could pose a Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: significant hazard. No additional mitigation is required. Impact 4.6-3: Construction and Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: operation of the proposed project W-0Z4.6-3 In the event that previously unknown or unidentified soil and/or Planning and Project Applicant During could expose construction workers groundwater contamination that could present a threat to human health or the Building Agency Construction or the public to significant health environment is encountered during construction of the proposed project, and safety hazards through construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the contamination shall cease reasonably foreseeable upset and immediately. If contamination is encountered, a Risk Management Plan shall be accident conditions involving the prepared and implemented that (1) identifies the contaminants of concern and the release of hazardous materials potential risk each contaminant would pose to human health and the environment into the environment. during construction and post -development and (2) describes measures to be taken to protect workers, and the public from exposure to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation, long-term monitoring, post - development maintenance or access limitations, or some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of contamination, if any, appropriate agencies shall be notified (e.g., City of Santa Ana Fire Department). Ifneeded, a Site Health and Safety Plan that meets Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements shall be prepared and in place prior to commencement of work in any contaminated area. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-27 City Council 18 — 426 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitonngParty Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming Impact 4.6-5: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project could result MM-0Z4.6-4 The applicant shall file a Notice of Proposed Construction or Planning and Project Applicant Project to be in a safety hazard for people Alteration with the FAA (FAA Form 7460-1). Following the FAA's Aeronautical Building Agency reviewedbyALUC residing or woiang in the project Study of the project, the project must comply with conditions of approval imposed /FAA/ALUC between Planning area. or recommended by the FAA Subsequent to the FAAfindings, the City shall refer Commission and the project to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County for City Council consistency analysis. meetings to discuss project and ER Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Impact 4.6-6: Construction of the Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: proposed project could interfere MM-0Z4.6-5 Prior to initiation of construction activities, the project shall have a Public Wod<s Project Applicant Prior to/During with an adopted emergency completed traffic control plan, prepared by the developer, which wiIl be Construction response plan or emergency implemented during construction activities. This may include, but is not limited to, evacuation plan. the maintenance of at least one unobstructed lane in both directions on surrounding roadways. At any time only a single lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic signal, signal carvers (i.e., flagpersons), or other appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions. If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer shall provide appropriate signage indicating alternative routes. MM-0Z4.6-6 The City Planning Division shall consult with the Santa Ana Police Planning and Planning and Prior WDu ing Department and the Santa Ana Fire Department to disclose temporary closures Building Building Agency Construction and alternative travel routes in order to ensure adequate access for emergency Agency/Police vehicles when construction of future projects would result in temporary land or Dept./Fire Dept. roadway closures. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Hydrology and Water Quality Impact 4.7-1: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project would not NW-0Z4.7-1 In order to comply with the 2003 DAMP, a Storm Drain Plan, a Public Works Project Applicant Prior to issuance of violate water quality standards, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (S)APPP), and a Water QualityManagement pennits waste discharge, or otherwise plan (WQMP) conforming to the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination substantially degrade water System (NPDESLequirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or 4-28 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 427 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitoringParry Project ImplementingParry MitigationTiming quality. Environmental Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. (a) ASWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements of each phase ofthe development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted mnoffuntil all construction workfor the project is completed. The SWPPP shall include treatment and disposal ofall dewatering operation flows, and for nuisance flows during construction. (b) AWQMP shall be prepared, maintained, and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements ofthe adopted NPDES program. The plan shall incorporate water quality measures for all improved phases ofthe project. (c) Location ofthe BMPs shall not be within the public right-of-way. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Impact 4.7-4: Development of the Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures from: proposed project could alter the MM-0Z4.7-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall Public Woks Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of existing drainage pattern and submit a Hydrology and Hydraulic Study to the Public Works Department for Grading Permits potentially result in increased review and approval. If existing facilities are not adequate to handle runoff that downstream flooding through the may be generated by the proposed development, then the applicant shall propose addition of impervious surfaces, or feasible remedies to assure that adequate drainage facilities will be available prior exceeding the capacity of existing to issuance of occupancy permits. The applicant may propose stone drain or planned stormwater drainage improvements to be constructed in order to meet project needs. Ifnecessary storm systems. drain upgrades cannot be implemented prior to issuance ofoccupancy permits, on site detention facilities or other methods acceptable to the City shall be included with new development projects to ensure that post -construction runoff does not exceed pre -development quantities. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Noise Impact 4.9-1 Construction Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: activities associated with the NW-0Z4.9-1 Construction activities shall be limited to the following general Planning and Project Applicant During proposed project would generate restrictions: Building Agency Construction noise tevets mat exceed ute noise Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-29 City Council 18 — 428 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers I MonitonngParty Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming standards established by the City . AD construction activity within the City shall be conducted in accordance with of Santa Ana. Noise Regulations. Section 18-314(e) ofthe City ofSanta Ana Municipal Code. MM-0Z4.9-2 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that the Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of following construction best management practices (BMPs) be implemented by Building Agency Grading Permit contractors to reduce construction noise levels: ■ Two weeks prior to the commencement of construction, notification must be provided to surrounding land uses within 1,000 feet of a project site disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration ofthe construction period. ■ Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffied according to industry standards and be in good woddng condition. ■ Place noise -generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses, where feasible. ■ Schedule high noise -producing activities between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 P.M to minimize disruption on sensitive uses. ■ Implement noise attenuation measures to the extent feasible, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationaryconstruction noise sources. ■ Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible. ■ Constructionrelatedequipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned offwhen not in use for more than 30 minutes. ■ Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent. Ifthe City or the job superintendent receives a complaint, the superintendent shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action taken to the reporting party. ■ Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit MM-0Z4.9-3 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of construction staging areas along with the operation of earthmoving equipment Building Agency Grading Permit widen the project area would be located as far away from vibration and noise 4-30 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 429 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitonngParry Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming sensitive sites as possible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance ofa grading permit. MM-0Z4.94 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away from Building Agency Grading Permit residential streets to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the Cityprior to issuance ofa grading permit. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Impact 4.9-2: Operation of the Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: proposed project would not NW-0Z4.9-5 Where fixture residential uses would be construction in areas Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of expose residents on site to noise exposed to noise levels greater than 60 dBACNEL, prior to issuance of building Building Agency Building Permits levels that exceed the standards permits building plans shall reflect the construction ofnoise barriers around patios established by the City of Santa and balconies. The barriers shall be constructed ofmaterials that provide a surface Ana- density of at least four pounds per square foot and shall be continuous, without gaps or gates. The height of the barriers shall be sufficient to reduce the exterior noise levels to a CNELof 65 dBAor less, and shall be determined by a qualified acousticalconsultant as part ofthe final engineering design ofthe project. M1\4-0Z4.9-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, building plans shall specify the Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of STC rating of windows and doors for all residential land uses. Window and door Building Agency Building Permits ratings shall be sufficient to reduce the interior noise level to a CNELof 45 dBAor less, and shall be detemrined by a qualified acoustical consultant as part of the final engineering design ofthe project. MM-0Z4.9-7 The developer shall provide proper shielding for all new HVAC Planning and Project Applicant During Project systems used by the proposed residential and mixed use buildings to achieve an Building Agency Design and attenuation of 15 dBAat 50 feet fromthe equipment. Construction Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-31 City Council 18 — 430 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Impacts Public Services Impact 4.11-3: Operation of the Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: proposed project would require MM-0Z4.11-1 Individual project developers shall pay school impact fees prior to Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of new or physically altered facilities the issuance ofoccupancypermits. Building Agency OccupancyPemuts to accommodate additional students in Tustin Unified School District (n-JSD) schools. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures No additional mitigation is required. Transportation/Traffic Impact 4.12-1: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the proposed project would cause NW-0Z4.12-2 Future development within the proposed Overlay Zone shall Public Works Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of an increase in traffic which is prepare separate traffic studies, specific to the individual projects that are Building Permits substantial in relation to the proposed. The traffic studies for future projects shall be prepared by a qualified existing traffic load and capacity of traffic engineer of the City's choosing. Further, and as determined by the traffic the street system. studies, the above identified improvement measures shall be implemented as a condition of the proposed development, either through the direct construction of improvements by the project applicant or through payment ofa fee, as required by the program detailed in MM-0Z4.12-4. MM-0Z4.12-4 The City of Santa Ana shall institute a program for systematic Planning and Planning and During mitigation of impacts as development proceeds within the Overlay Zone to ensure Building Building Implementation of mitigation of the individual improvements. The program shall prescribe the method Agency/Public Agency/Public Project ofparticipation in the mitigation program by individual projects and guide the timely Wo& WO& implementation of the mitigation measures. The program should include the following elements: ■ A funding and improvement program should be established to identify financial resources adequate to construct all identified mitigation measures in a timely basis. ■ The program should allow for acquisition of entire properties including business relocation where necessary to construct mitigation measures. Funds derived from sale of surplus acquired properties should be returned to the program. ■ All properties that redevelop within the Overlay Zone should participate in the program on a fair share per new development trip basis. The fair share should be based upon the total cost ofall identified mitigation measures, divided by the 4-32 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 431 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitonngParry Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming peak hour trip generation increase forecast. This rate per peak hour trip should be imposed upon the incremental traffic growth for any new development within the Overlay Zone. ■ The program should include resources to conduct preliminary engineering studies to complete alignment studies and project specific environmental clearances for Tustin Avenue at 17th Street and at 4th Street. ■ The program should raise funds from full development of the Overlay Zone to fund all identified mitigation measures. ■ The program should monitor phasing development of the Overlay Zone and defer or eliminate improvements if the densities permitted in the Overlay Zone are not occurring. ■ Program phasing should be monitored through preparation of specific project traffic impact studies for any project that is expected to include more than 100 dwelling units or 100,000 square feet of non-residential development. Traffic impact studies should use traffic generation rates that are deemed to be most appropriate for the actual development proposed. ■ The program should initiate project development to assure timely completion of the improvements identified to be needed for the First and Cabrillo Towers project by 2010 or as soon after as practically feasible. ■ Properties within Santa Ana and within one-half rile of the Overlay Zone that redevelop to result in higher traffic generation should also participate in the program to insure equity. ■ The program should provide for full construction of projects outside of Santa Ana, ifthe Overlay Zone willcreate a traffic impact based upon the C1vII'. ■ The program should provide fair share contribution to construction costs of other improvements outside of the Overlay Zone if they are identified in this traffic study but they are not impacted as defined by the CMP. ■ The fair share contribution would presume participation by other developments outside of the City of Santa Ana (generally within the City of Tustin) in proportion to traffic growth at the affected sites. ■ Traffic impact studies for future projects shall be prepared by a qualified traffic engineer approved or retained by the City. ■ The City may elect to implement appropriate mitigation measures as a condition of approval of the proposed developments, where appropriate. AD or part of the costs of these improvements may be considered to be a negotiated Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-33 City Council 18 — 432 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitonngParry Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming credit toward the program, however the Program must be administered in a manner that assures that it can fund necessary improvements to maintain adequate level of service at all intersections within this study. ff funding of priority improvements cannot be assured, credit for construction of lower priority improvements may not be assured or may be postponed until more Program funds are available. ■ Traffic studies for future developments within the Overlay Zone must also use trip generation rates which are specific for these projects and are approved by the City. The traffic consultant preparing traffic studies for specific projects in the Overlay Zone must use City -approved trip generation rates specific to these projects. These studies are subject to Cityreview. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: NM 4.12-1 The project applicant shall make a fair share contribution for the Public Wodcs Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of construction of an eastbound right turn lane (approximately 300 feet in length) at the fast Certificate the intersection ofFourth Street at SR-55 Southbound Ramps prior to the issuance ofOccupancy ofgrading pernrits. MM4.12-2 The project applicant shall make a fair share contribution for the Public Woks Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of construction ofa raised median or other means such as diverter islands to prevent the first Certificate eastbound and westbound left turns and through movements at the intersection of ofOccupancy Sixth Street at Tustin Avenue prior to the issuance ofgrading pemuts. Impact 4.12-8: The proposed Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: project would not conflict with W-0Z4.12-1 As part of the project, the City of Santa Ana and the project Public Works Public Works During adopted policies, plans, or sponsors shall worm with the transit providers to implement various transit -related Implementation of programs supporting alternative measures to improve and expand bus system service within the Overlay Zone. the Project transportation. These measures may include, but are not limited to, the following. ■ Adding bus stops to the OverlayZone along existing and proposed roadways ■ Changing bus service headways to respond to increased demand ■ Changing bus service destinations to respond to changing demand ■ Adding local shuttle service for employees and patrons ofthe Overlay Zone The details of bus service improvements shall be determined in coordination with OCTA The following recommendations would help encourage public transit patronage for project -related trips: ■ Bus Stop Locations -Relocation of existing bus stops and the provision of additional bus stops should be considered to accommodate transit users at convenient locations. 4-34 r'04 nf Santa Ana City Council 18 — 433 10/3/2023 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Impacts 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring Program for the First and MitigationMeasures Cabrillo Towers MonitoringParty Project ImplementingParty MitigationTiming ■ Days of Operation —The City should work with OCTAto consider changes to route times to serve nighttime and weekend project visitors and employees. Headway —The City should work with OCTA to review route headways to determine if it would be appropriate to reduce them to accommodate transit riders within the Overlay Zone. Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required Utilities and Service Systems Impact 4.13 4: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the Metro East Mixed use Overlay lb mitigation is required Public Works Project Applicant Prior to issuance of Zone could require the Building pests construction of new or expanded wastewater conveyance systems, Project -Specific Mitigation Measures: the construction of which would MM4.13-4 A6-inch building lateral shall be installed on -site for the purposes of not cause significant conveying wastewater flows fromthe proposed project to the existing OCSD environmental effects. conveyance system. Impact 4.13-8: Implementation of Applicable Overlay Zone Mitigation Measures: the First and Cabrillo Tower could MM-0Z4.13-2 The project shall implement energy conservation measures (such Planning and Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of increase the demand for as energy -efficient lighting and micro processor controlled HVAC equipment) to Budding Agency Building Permits electricity, but would not require or reduce the demand for electricity and natural gas. The energy conservation result in the construction of new measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed or if energy production or transmission current technology becomes obsolete through replacement. facilities, the construction of which could cause a significant environmental impact. project -Specific Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Metro East Mivarl I Ica Ovprla�i 7nna (\/nIi imp 111) 4-35 City Council 18 — 434 10/3/2023 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION Project Title: Cabrillo Town Center Project Location: 1901, 1971 E. 4th Street and 515, 525 N. Cabrillo Park Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Lead Agency: City of Santa Ana Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Applicant: Fairfield 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92121 Prepared By: CAJA Environmental Services, LLC 9410 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 101 Chatsworth, CA 91311 The purposes of this Technical Memorandum are to assess the consistency of the Project's proposed development plan with the development assumptions for the Project Site in the environmental impact report (EIR) that was prepared in 2006 and certified by the City of Santa Ana (the "City") in 2007 for City of Santa Ana Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone (the "Overlay Zone"), which is hereinafter referred to as the "Certified EIR." This Technical Memorandum assesses whether the environmental impacts of the Project fall within the extent of the environmental impacts disclosed in the Certified EIR or whether the Project would result in new or increase significant impacts beyond those disclosed in the Certified EIR in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), which sets forth criteria to use a program EIR for "later activities" within the scope of a program EIR. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2), "[w]hether a later activity is within the scope of a program EIR is a factual question that the lead agency determines based on substantial evidence in the record. Factors that an agency may consider in making that determination include, but are not limited to, consistency of the later activity with the tvpe of allowable land use, overall planned density and building intensity, geograohn area analyzed for environmental impacts, and covered infrastructure, as described in the program EIR." As discussed in detail below, the impacts of the Project fall within the scope of the impacts disclosed in the Certified EIR. For these reasons, no additional CEQA review is required for the Project. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechQ" nno.,,,,r-Ji- nllpicr 2023 City Council 18 — 435 10/3/2023 1.1 Overlay Zone The description of the Overlay Zone below is from Chapter 3 (Project Description) of the Certified EIR. The Overlay Zone included the following primary elements: • A potential increase in City population of 11,102 residents. • A potential increase in the number of available residences within City limits by 5,551 units. • The potential development of 1,275,440 gross square feet of commercial (retail and service) space, as well as 3,410,507 gross square feet of office space. This corresponds to a potential net increase of approximately 963,000 square feet of commercial space and 690,000 square feet of office space beyond existing conditions. The Certified EIR notes that the above development scenario is in accordance with the intended mix of uses as envisioned by the City, in accordance with the Overlay Zone requirements and restrictions explained therein. The project description for the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone EIR provides detailed information regarding (1) development standards by district within the Overlay Zone, (2) residential development and City population, and (3) parking and circulation. The Overlay Zone allows for mixed -use development with an emphasis on residential, commercial, and office uses. Development Standards by District within the Overlay Zone The Overlay Zone allows development to occur per the following district designations: • Neighborhood Transitional • Village Center • Active Urban • Office Neighborhood Transitional The Neighborhood Transitional District is intended to provide opportunities for development that acts as a transition between the single-family residential to the north and the adjacent high - intensity Active Urban District. Designated for the lowest scale and the lowest intensity of uses in the Overlay Zone, development in this district is limited to residential, live/work, or office uses. These uses may combine office on the ground floor with residential above or in freestanding single -use buildings on the same site at between two and three (2-3) stories in height. New development in this area will be designed to provide an appropriate interface with high levels of landscaping and design features that minimize impacts to the adjacent single-family residential area to the north. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechQ" nno.,,,,r-Ji- nllpicr 2023 City Council 2 18 — 436 10/3/2023 Active Urban The Active Urban District is intended as the location for well -designed high-rise mixed -use developments in a highly urbanized environment that capitalizes on the exposure and access provided by two adjacent freeways, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) and Costa Mesa (State Route 55), and two major arterials (First and Fourth Streets and Tustin Avenue), as well as its proximity of the Santa Ana Depot. Development in this District is envisioned to reflect signature architecture that reinforces the identity and character of Metro East as a vibrant urban village that serves as a regional employment and activity center. The Active Urban District will include major office, residential, commercial, hotel, and entertainment opportunities that are more intensive in scale and design than the adjacent Village Center. Developments in this District may combine office, commercial, and residential uses within one vertical mixed use -building with commercial on the ground floor and office or residential on the upper floors or a mix of uses within freestanding buildings on the same site. Developments will be designed to showcase an amenity -enhanced environment that provides numerous open space opportunities within this urban environment for the enjoyment of residents, employees, and visitors, and to promote pedestrian connections between this District and the Village Center as well as Cabrillo Park located north of the Overlay Zone. Village Center The Village Center District is intended to serve as the focal point and central gathering place within the Overlay Zone in well -designed highly connected development sites and public spaces. The District will provide a high level of neighborhood identity and activity through its central location and its emphasis on creating a vibrant, attractive, and highly -interconnected pedestrian environment. Opportunities will be provided for shopping, dining, recreation, entertainment, and services accessed by extensively landscaped, wide sidewalks that allow free flow between jobs, housing, and commercial services, or opportunities for leisure walking within the Village Center. This District will provide commercial, office, and residential uses in the same building or on the same site in mid -rise buildings of between four and ten (4-10) stories in settings that provide open spaces, niches, and areas for gatherings and activities along streets, paseos, and interconnecting walkways that link the Village Center to adjacent districts and nearby public parks north of the District. Office The Office District contains existing low- to high-rise office development along Tustin Avenue and adjacent to Interstate Freeway. These properties were in place prior to the establishment of the Overlay Zone and will retain their exclusive office zoning in order to promote and maintain a healthy balance between office, commercial, and residential land uses within the Overlay Zone. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechQ" nno.,,,,r-Ji- nllpicr 2023 City Council 3 18 — 437 10/3/2023 Parking and Circulation Under the Overlay Zone, several improvements/modifications to the existing roadway network may occur. These improvements are designed to enhance the existing circulation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the area. The location of the Overlay Zone between Interstate 5 and State Route 55 necessitates the provision of an adequate street network to handle the increased traffic volumes that would occur under this project. Three additional street segments may potentially be constructed during the implementation of the Overlay Zone in conjunction with re -use of the properties under a private development scenario. The first would involve the connection of Sixth Street to Park Court Place from Parkcenter Drive westward to Cabrillo Park Drive. The second segment would extend Golden Circle Drive northward to connect with the proposed extension of Sixth Street. The third and final segment would extend Parkcenter Drive at Fourth Street southward to First Street. In addition, an alleyway with pedestrian improvements may be constructed from Cabrillo Park Drive to the proposed extension of Parkcenter Drive, between First and Fourth Streets. Additional Amenities In addition to the street network improvements, the City is proposing the installation of numerous additional street trees and pedestrian -scale streetlights. Additional streetlights would be restricted to the proposed street segments. Additional street trees would be provided along all roadway segments (proposed and existing) within the Overlay Zone to enhance the residential/aesthetic character of the area. Residential Development and City Population the Overlay Zone is dominated by office and commercial facilities. Under the Overlay Zone, residential uses would be introduced into an area that is devoid of any residential structures. In total, up to 5,551 residential units would be constructed should the overlay zone reach full buildout. A household size ratio in the range of 1.8 persons per household (pph) is consistent with the sales/rental experience of downtown -oriented mixed -use development in other similar cities (e.g., Pasadena, Burbank, Long Beach). Sales, rental, and marketing experience of downtown developers in other cities with higher density mixed -use development projects comparable to that expected in the Overlay Zone suggest that residents of these areas are predominantly singles, young couples, and empty -nesters, but rarely families with children. The experience of comparable developments suggests that the average medium -high density mixed -use residential unit is occupied by one or two individuals. As such, for the purposes of the analysis in this EIR, a conservative household size estimate of 2.0 pph is considered an appropriate and accurate prediction of the future demographics of the Overlay Zone. Buildout of the Overlay Zone would result in a potential population increase of 11,102 residents. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechQ" nno.,,,,r-Ji- nllpicr 2023 City Council 4 18 — 438 10/3/2023 In addition, implementation of the Overlay Zone would include improvement/widening of existing sidewalks and certain existing roadways within the Overlay Zone. General Plan Amendment The General Plan was amended concurrently with the adoption of the Overlay Zone to include a new land use designation, Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU), which replaced the existing Professional and Administrative Office PAO) designation. The General Plan Amendment accomplished two primary objectives of the Overlay Zone: (1) to allow residential uses in order to facilitate mixed -use development, and (2) to increase the development intensity permitted within the Overlay Zone. These changes achieved the active, highly-amenitized urban village environment envisioned within the Overlay Zone. Specifically, the Land Use Element Policy Plan, which includes the Land Use Map and Development Intensity Standards, was amended to include the MEMU designation. In addition, text was added to the Land Use Implementation Section of the Land Use Element to discuss the general provisions of the MEMU designation including its purpose and objectives as well as the land uses envisioned within each of the four districts of the Overlay Zone: Neighborhood Transitional, Village Center, Active Urban, and Office. The General Plan Amendment changed the land use designation of properties within the Overlay Zone. However, uses specified under the PAO designation are included in the MEMU designation in addition to a variety of additional non-residential uses, including, but not limited to uses such as hotels, health clubs, studios, and art galleries. The MEMU designation permits these land uses subject to a development proposal's compliance with required provisions specified in the Overlay Zone. Proposed Zoning The Zoning Code and Zoning Map for the Overlay Zone was amended concurrently with the adoption of the Overlay Zone to include a mixed -use overlay zone to be offered in addition to the existing zoning for that area. Any issue not specifically covered in the Overlay Zone is subject to the provisions of the underlying zoning district specified in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Interpretations may be made by the applicable review authority if not specifically covered in the City's existing regulations. As proposed, property owners will have the option to develop to the provisions of the Overlay Zone at their discretion. They may also choose to develop to the existing underlying zone. BUILDOUT OF THE OVERLAY ZONE The City envisions the potential buildout of a mixed -use community within the Overlay Zone by 2030. The City anticipates that buildout of the Overlay Zone would occur at a rate of approximately 5 percent per year. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechQ" nno.,,,,r-Ji- nllpicr 2023 City Council 5 18 — 439 10/3/2023 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.2.1 Project Location The 8.97-acre (390,657-square-foot) Project Site is located in the City at 1901, 1971 E. 4th Street and 515, 525 N. Cabrillo Park Drive. The Project Site location is shown in Figures 1 and 2. The Project Site is bounded by Cabrillo Park on the north, 4th Street on the south, commercial development on the east, and Cabrillo Park Drive on the west. Regional access to the Project Site is provided by Interstate 5 located approximately 750 feet west of the Project Site. 1.2.2 Existing Conditions The Project Site is zoned P-Professional and is identified with a "Village Center District' designation in the Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone (the "Overlay Zone"). The land use designation for the Project Site is GP-DC-3, 3.0. The Project Site is currently developed with four three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 173,025 square feet of floor area and approximately 617 surface parking spaces. 1.2.3 Surrounding Land Uses The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City. The greater Project Site area is largely developed with a mix of commercial and residential development. 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1.3.1 Project Overview The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space. Project plans are shown in Figures 3 through 31. The Project Site would be separated into two distinct areas by a roadway (Parkcourt Place), which would traverse the site east/west. The southern portion of the Project Site (Parcel 1) would be developed with a five -story mixed -use building arranged around an internal parking structure and one subterranean level that includes residential storage. This building would include 449 apartment units and 26,800 square feet of ground -floor commercial uses, which could include retail, office, and shopkeeper uses. The northern portion of the Project Site (Parcel 2) would be developed with 58 townhomes in eight, three-story (37 feet and 1 inch in height) buildings arranged around a central open space area. Each townhome would include two, three, or four bedrooms, a parking garage, and private outdoor space. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechQ" nno.,,,,r— j — nllpicr 2023 City Council 6 18 — 440 10/3/2023 r s A. 4 SERVICE LAI 1? CABRII I n PARK DRIVE — — -— —� O z. 0 80 Scale (Feet) •1 Figure ource:AOArcI{li tyAb81 Cil 18 — 441 10/3/ II Site Plat t4 w 0 w a U w w 0 REQUIREDOPEN SPACE f.ATE�N'/ nLMBER AREA PERUNi(Sp. FT TOIALMEARE o of LNng � Pa Pf.1 b aya APLRRBnS up b Ip,ua TOTAi CquMERCMl FpRCEMAOE pF TOTAL TOTAL AREA REatMEp AREA LOT.RE,i tsa PT.� M.9b Ti i 31p IpTAL OPFM aiRCE 1.pUIFL a0.E1d PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED �®00 >�oo Ill�o®o �00 �000 ®000 ®00� COMMON . A—TVPE -..■ roTALArsEA Leo PT.) Pc�L AM- euLawpTVARo aP■�wAcr aa14 ��XOMeeae■■R ARo..APARn.EM Pool ,,,ae, ccuRrcAROE-errteRTAXa�ewr a9ii fA1.R1YARp OT1E TACNVARpa• aw Rope TERRACE 9.aao 1,ua auaRmu. i,ws APARTLEXIa COMMpM pPEM aPACE N.OIa m1ET OPEN SPACE PROVIDED -AREA REOV 0 Ace OPEN scacE aTaTx 4TH STREET — _ — ccnnonoPLn sPACL Te..m TOTAL LOT Ann PERGEMAGE OF TOTAL fOTA�AREA REGVY■p LOT AREA PO Er.� TPa,TN 1011 30.01� —LA PRwE[o Pn M T CEMERPtA]A Mw PASEO '9Ta9 TOTAL PVatlC OPEM WALE PROYipW II.Ha LEGEND w�L�uTAccEss�eLEOPENsP:, COMXgN USARLECPENSPACE iWFP*RA FT SPAoF 0 100 Scale (Feet) E old Figure )urce:AOArcoty,G.bm cil 18 — 442 an Parcel is Am ■■ � i F - ;auria roar MAMIE �. 1 - s ' ■ r , , 6alIl ..q l 1 - �-- �r9 0i� _i�ll��� fl 1 4 r' ��r ; I ° , iv-o• r , I _ t r+ -------------------------------------------- --�.............i . ' ; ............ . r ■ . ... a •CURT � 4ACE-, --------- ! , E Jll1. 7>w.. E �71 l�ifr�. .1 K 51 ��•If_ A r SFr Townhome Site Summary. Project Address: 1901, 1971 F. 4th Street & 515, 525 N. Cabrillo Park Dr. APNr 400-051-02,09,14 &15 General Plan Designation: GP-DC-3, 3.0 Allowable FAR: 0 75-3.0 Current Zoning: P - Professional MEMU Overlay Zone: Village Center Dishict Site Area: 2.74 Acres. 119.278 sf Dwelling Units: 58 DU Density: 21 DUI Gross Habitable Area 122,226 sf (Excludes Garage) FAR: 1.12 Occupancy Type: R-3 Construction Type: V-B Sprinkler Type: NFPA 13-D Unit Summary: Unit Plan Unit Type Net Area Quantity % Plan 1 2 bd12.51ti8 1,479 SF 6 DU 10% Plan 2 2 bd12.511ea 1.478 SF 6 DU 10% Plan 3 3 bdf3.5ba 1,736 SF 14 DU 24% Plan 4 3 bd13.5ba 1,811 SF 20 DU 35% Plan 5 4 bdf3.5ba 1,927 SF 12 DU 21% Total 56 DU Building Summary: Type Bldg Area # Bldgs Total Area Bldg A 15,311 sf 2 30,622 sf Bldg B 17,962 sf 2 35,924 sf Bldg C 20.474 sf 2 40.948 sf Bldg D 21,352 sf 2 42,704 sf Pool 560 sf 1 580 sf Total 150,778 sf Parking Required: 58 du x 2 Spaces: 116 Spaces Accessible parking Required: 11 guest spaces x 5%: 1 Space Parking Provided Garages: 116 Spaces Open Sp06es: 11 Spaces (1 Accessible) Total (2.19fUnit) 127 Spaces KEYNOTES 1� Parallel Parking Space o Pool ❑' Accessible Parking Space ❑< Property Line ❑a Accessible Route ...... ❑u Accessible Ground Floor 10-7 COLOR SCHEME 1 Building Type COLOR SCHEME x Building Number CO) 40 80 Scale (Feet) Figure 5 Source: ScherndQt)bQQU d. 18 — 443 an Parcel 2 J,-T 0 " I 22 viAll: es i a 1 � � A 1 - wm� 1 r I I I I I , , III II I I I I i 4 I y I J I L J `t- — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 1864" 789'•9" I -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEGEND F— 4a 4'e63TORMOF UNIT MO OU. FT,) MR. DRIVE DRIVE a AISLE o IKF 1, n WALL PARKING STRUCTURE STANDARD DIMENSIONS SCALE: Vie" = V-0" C") 0 30 60 Scale (Feet) Figure 9 Source: AOArcQ*,tea. Cil 18 - 447 1 3Sub-T Floor ear•r i �r-s 3sss• pfi �VJI COURTYARD C. rl ea s• \ DRIVE n AISLE .L o \ b v\ WALL PARKING STRUCTURE STANDARD DIMENSIONS SCALE: Yts' = 9'-T 01 RETAIL K,2 2= 13 PARKING � • m SHOPK EPERS SNOPK EPER5 = B SH EPERS ENTRY SHOPR EPERS SHOPKEEPERS �. PLAZA 0 30 60 Scale (Feet) Figure 1C 3ource: AO ArcQ*,tea. Cil 18 - 448 Buil- First Flool a03 41-5' 3555 .IiPA• � 1&7 MOVE -I VC DRIVE L Q P AISLE o A LUBROO r® e,w am Q OPEN 10aElOn IL w • •e0" m ry 6 �• � COU'AARD Lo COURTYARD a b L WALL PARKING STRUCTURE FITNESS STANDARD DIMENSIONS L 4 m . �1 SCALE: Vie' = 1'-0" ._.. •' yyp .. . e COURTYARD ENTRY COURT All— $ OMMERCIA aPan,oaaxaw � m.� ZT-p P 1 . - COURTYARD e4-1- e }F� 9 TOWN �'-0ne t3 s MOVE -IN CENTER PT RETAIL �: a P " e Y� '..;mL �. wanrosaow caanroeEwnv � 11��"�1 �I n �7j W V L L_1L W L W SHOPKEEPERS Cd, a PLAZA 4s-, z3a-z• m-e^ 0 30 60 3av-a- Scale (Feet) Figure 1 :)urce: AID ArcQ*,tea- cil 18 - 449 1,07TZ02,1 cond Floc 4i-5 a03 J55 9 1° 0' a y a AI d ea 13 L2 G T e C2 C� DRIVE ,w v ra b AISLE o A Izc�l° btJ o- — 6 ® e1W ®E C Fq p f 13N7 RN F a 6 0' COURTYARD JCOURTYARD 'A' � b H a cs a ea Ctea LL e'-o- a� PARKING STRUCTURE STANDARD DIMENSIONS Lis E,A.SCALE: Y, = V_D„ am CtR ae rt 0 o i MOTOR 23-10, J m COURTYARD 7F _ COURT C e 23-0, 27,.0 3 + 1. I - COURTYARD Illy } 8 _ TOWN" _ iDA CENTER PLAZA -8•-0tte. T'p v ti ryv U111 SHOPKEEPERS Cd, PLAZA 0 30 60 52'.11" 2M.4" 3W-Ir Scale (Feet) Figure 1 Buildii iy Phil Is >urce: AO Arc *,�. Ci1 18 — 450 - Fifth Flool 1 � 403'-2' 4 " 35Y-Y y ROOF b MOTOR COURT ROOF TOWN CENTER PLAZA e11V ROOF COURTYARD ROOF COURTYARD sa-e ROOF COURTYARD BE-1 ROOF PARKING STRUCTURE STANDARD DIMENSIONS SCALE: Y, ' = V-0" i ROOF SHOPKEEPERS Ct-;' PLAZA sa,r 2344 m.. 0 30 60 3w-P _ Scale (Feet) Figure irce: AO Arc ' *,Gmm� Ci1 18 — 451 i - Sixth FIc BUILDING BELOW 9' BUILDING BELOW BUILDING BELOW {;u - IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII' IIIIIIII' _ II� ®f1,11111'N I BUILDING BELOW r z_r 4 .f 1 BUILDING BELOW 4 l� BUILDING BELOW IYO`�_�V IYV_ n` DRIVE AISLE o a. n ------------ LL PARKING STRUCTURE STANDARD DIMENSIONS SCALE: ye' = V-0" 1EQ-0' �t6�m i 0 30 60 Scale (Feet) Figure 1' ource:AID ArcQ*,tea. Cif 18 - 452 0 venth Floc 0 It Eli C 1 M il:!..! _ ! �. , !..! F1 IL �l�1� � w �. 1� !.—.! �; L—.! .I ice. O N i 1 1� ii i Pik, 14;1 i .-5-- J0 • • p 0 0 © p 110 1117 110 © © 0 la IO I` I i■ rl 1 ! -�i 3� 11 1 I I i I■ IIII I I' I 1 �I I I[ ■1 I I �1 1 I 1 13 L ' Fl �I i iI i_I L. 1 I� 1... 1 _ ! F! I imp I 1 #1 : i I■ L1 1 I - 11 111 I ! I■_ 11 E� ! 1 �I 1 I I! i I Lill! 'WRY f#i 1 1 Figure 15 Source: AIDArcQ*,tea. cif 18 - 453 - 8UU,Ll I 1 MovSouthwesi T T yIN 4 a Ci © 0 Il62 1 30 !i !i ri p! p! I_�I! 1 ! I ■ E n !! �� I� 1� r ! ! !p �i II'E� � !! p! Ili !i ■i p! p! I'�I�-1 I! � i ii n __ i ! �� n n i 11 ,ia i If 1 ! �� N iY i i ■i L! 8 MATERIAL I COLOR LEGEND El ❑g rrn..a.ro ® . '❑ ,. �B v,ou.rc.n u� NORTH ELEVATION 4 ©��. K p! EAST ELEVATION 5 KEY MAP NORTHEAST CORNER VIEW 6 o ,s 5 PPApNG m BIRUCTLPiE LI —1 NORTH P°ursi>r s�Er Figure 1 urce:AOArcQ*,tea. Cif 18 - 454 10 d Northea CORNER VIEW ONE 4TH STAND CABRILLO PARK DR 1 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROJECT ALONG E 4TH ST 2 Q o PARRCOURT PUCE WUP a 3r 'LL7- N® j, FW"SR EE V 2 VIEW OF MAIN ENTRANCE AND LEASING ON CABRILLO PARK DR 3 Figure 17 Source: AO Arc *,tea. Cif 18 — 455 Pel lvWM53 Apartments NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROJECT ON CABRILLO PARK DR 4 VIEW OF WEST FACING COURTYARDS AND PASEO 5 KEY MAP j ��� p9� `A ,nr 6 wvw 0 S � vMua arwen,E NORTH FW"STREET P5 VIEW OF TOWNHOMES ALONG CABRILLO PARK DRIVE 6 Figure 18 Source: AO Arc *,tea. Cil 18 - 456 1 MM225Townhomes VIEW OF MAIN ENTRY INTO TOWNHOMES 7 L 4.gm6— �.q.A VIEW ALONG PARKCOURT DRIVE 9 VIEW ALONG PARKCOURT DRIVE 8 KEY MAP j� ---I F---- ] 9 raaKc vu 8 0 0 � PIf1U�17 NORTH rairsrn srnEEr Figure 19 Source: AO Arc *,tea. Cif 18 - 457 1 -225T homes 1. CORNER OF FOURTH STREET AND CABRILLO PARK DRIVE 5 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM i 2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING 6. BRICK VENEER rA[ IAI PAll N(__ 4. METAL CANOPY 7 VINYL WINDOW 2. CORNER OF CABRILLO PARK DRIVE AND PARKCOURT PLACE COLORS A. SHERUAN 1MLLIAMS 6_ SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW TRW HIGH REFLECTIVE M7MSILVERP TE WHITE D. SHERWIN WILLIAMS E. SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 8 CAANIvA SW 6 i RACK MAGIC C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW U42 BRACING BLUE ROOF MATERIAL TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM WHITE KEY MAP 2A O PAPo[N!G 67RNCTlFE NORTH 1, FOURTH STREEI .11 Figure 20 Source: AO Arc *,GM. Cif 18 — 458 matt-1 ials di id 3 Apartments ART COLUMNS LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE • Shrubs Miami to 30" Ugh max • Ueestdmmedtotrunk 7'from top of sidefflu( 0 CABRILLO PARK lei �I II I I IFIW111111111 II illll HIHuI I IlJI`'''E 111 'I''''II3't IIII Illl, 1IIII' I jw - .~ -- T j el -4111 �o,J�-moo w T PAR KC00RT PLACE " 0 SHOP -KEEPERS ; a KEEPERS E KEEPERS-1 �I w �a" _U_ fill LINE OFSIGHT TRIANGLE e • shrubs maintained to 39" high max T • trees trimmed to trunk 7 from top of sidewalk FT PROPOSED CENTRAL ` COMMERCIAL POINTE APARTMENTS & RETAIL �• Y TOWN CENTER PLAZA I j t, - -_. t t -. .IN see sheet Ls RETAIL SHOP -KEEPERS AI 'A -STREETTREES TO RE INSTALLED AS W FULK SI2E PER THE CITY STANDARDS & APPROVED PLAN. AS NEEDED • STREET TREES TO UE 35 O C ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE, INCLUDING DEEP ROOT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. PER CITY STANDARDS. CONTACT THE TREE SECTION SUPERVISOR II FOR TREE SPECIES & FOR NUMBER AND SIZE OF REOUIRED TREES REPLACEMENTS TUBULAR STEEL FENCE 6 H OECORA119E WORRY WALL IOWNHOME POOL COURTYARD see sheet E.10 l� kc APARTMENT POOL COURTYARD see sheet LH EIlTERIAINMENTCOORIYARO see sheet 1..1 ROOF TERRACE see sheet L9 THE -BACKYARDS' ' see sheet 1.6 ` —W dAAGE EATAY LINE OF SIGRT IRIAIIGIE ,= 4 T H STREET- _- - EHE -HACRYAROS _ see sheet 16 OCFCO EASEMENT - - - - - - no trees lobe planted in easement SHOPKEEPERS PLAZA see sheet l.5 H 0 50 100 Scale (Feet) Figure 2' Iource: MJS Lein ll� QllJnraaikure, 2 223. 18 — 459 scape Plat VERTICAL ELEMMISCULPIURE — MATCHING 18' H, DATE PALMS — LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE — • shrubs maimained to 80" high max • trees himmed to trunk 7' from top of sidewalk LINE OF SIGHT WANGLE • SnrubSmaintained to X high max • lrenWormed to trunk 7from top of sidewalk TOWN CENTER PLAZA • see sheet L7 POOL COURIYARO ROOFIOP DECK PLAZA WI MATCHING 18'H ENTERTAINMENT COURTYARD PARCOURT PLACE ACIIVAIION • see shaet L a • see sheet L 7DATE PALMS • see sheel t-5 • see sheel U AML (_ _ ARKCOURT PLACE J- -MOVE-IN II _HOP. O n �•r> r ;: CLUB RC)CM ,T, } OCFCDEASEMENi 3___ • no bees to be planted in easement SHO. !(EEPERS , FITNESS I ` COMMERCIAL j., i } i� RETAIL SHOPKEEPERS" __ SHOPKEEPERS 4TH STREET -1HL RACKYARDS- • see sheet L6 H MASONRY WALL SHOPKEEPERS PLAZA • see sheet L 7 TRASH STAGING ARIA KEYMAP� 0 50 100 Scale (Feet) Figure urce: MJS LeGill bIGOWhlrai Lure, 2023] 18 — 460 3/ 3Apartmen RETAINING WALL LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE • shrubs maintained to 30" high max • trees trimmed to trunk 7from top of sidewalk MATCHING IB' H. DATE PALMS VERTICAL ELEMENTISCULPTURE CAB RILLID PARN '- nw "' riin iuui wwr uun iiuu-i�iti" iriu iiiuiri r im iiiiid nm uiin ism iron - mu uu x itnt m� 6'HTdBULAA STEEL FENCE 6'NMpSDNRYWALI � •� III �`����_ I� � - � �� r' T 7 R' i ES - TOOM 1 , W L ; I ,I ,. W��.,.. Q - ❑° Ire- f 'r r� 1IM z r+rk, JLIIlk F r ,r • p .i .r - -1 I � I e t d GN RETAINING AEfI CONNECT I — WALL PATIOS P A R K C 0 U R T PLACE OIRECTCONNECTION TFEEWELLSAI i r T TIDS_ � • _ - BEN � r _I 30'OC MOUE-INLL t l-. •-trC7 .. r� rn rr PASSAGEWAY" T n V,hi PUBLIC PASEO • 6w walk • extended patios TOWNHOMEPOOL COUATYAROENLARGEMENT • see sheet L.9 DCFCD EASEMENT • no trees to be planted in easement KEYMAP 1qzV 0 50 100 Scale (Feet) Figure 2 >urce: MJS Ld@jA0l!@QtdMr&Ji1ure, 2023. 18 — 461 eunceptual tandscavu, r3TownhomE CAFE SEATING FIRESIDE PLAZA - fire p , I • tl g paving • alivetreeglav • festive lights CAFE SEATING 1� GATHERING PLAZA • platform seating • specimen tree . interlocking pavers LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE • shrubs maintained to 30 high max • trees trimmed to trunk - 7 from top of sidewalk {� COMMERCIAL FUTURE RESIDENT PARKING i RETAIL: Q7 7 *; wn-vi, /,TII STRFFT� Ilfllllk► 1111� ill}IIIIftree 11 afee �Ix a► -SHOPKEEPERS— LD PATIOS ei ion 00 6;15;-EM Scale (Feet) Figure urce: MJS LeQb�QlWMraailure, 2023. 18 - 462 10/ enter Pla, l J 11311131 '!'!i "J� .4 i�lv - Rip IWIN iff Ilk SAM 1,14 MII A k";;j am—KHE W i2WMW 1-34 � L looka, mr— pr, f 4 r---- 1 �ErW71 aoil 1 f a 1 �I � 1 a BOARDWALK CUTOOORKIICHEH "THE LAWN" IHEPAVILION" FIRESIDE LOUNGE PRIVATE DINING • wood -Look purrs • bbq counlerswith sit up bar • tounge seating 32n 42- structure - see inspration • hm pit • pendant lights • pendant bgMonportal atentry • shadetreLGs • synthetic tort Ohm below • potterywltrees • bbq • bee allee • lounge seating pods • mediawatt • heaters and fans • salt seating dining table • dining tables • lestivat lighting • kdchenwithrange,sinks. iegenalw. • pottery • accent bees • prlttery eftigmtOr and ice maker • cabanas wltoungeseat^. • 4lupistand counter • lounge area wth Iv • adollable • ;fining tables 01 �m l� AW uoi-- �'060— game tables �\:. - corn hole - sealing ,(g „ i f TTt OUIOOORfUTCHEN ism I I 11' BIKE 5HON GAME TERRACE Figure 2 iurce: MJS Lim AOA Gatdhlrsikure, 2O23. 18 — 467 ent Terrac OUTDOOR LINING • bhq • overhead shade structure FOUL COURTYARD • 52' length pool • loungefunturemthumbretlas SPA • chaise lounge seating • umbrellas • dining tables • daybeds • matchingheighldatepalms = i i L. �I I� RESTOOMSI POOL EQUIP. I ❑�- Ip � o' I I I ENT7M�OTTCOURT I I I a Figure 30 Source: MJS Ld@jA0I!GQiJM &Ji1ure, 2 223. 18 — 468 2 1 Courtyard r y y Mgr �I ,'�, � �`¢ - ��I]#4� � • "- -416 Figure 31 Source: MJS LeQill �QtdhlQilure, 2023. 18 — 469 10 pe Imagery A breakdown in the types of residential units is provided in Table 1. Table 1 Residential Unit Breakdown Unit Type I Number Parcel 1 Studio 23 1 Bedroom 262 2 Bedroom 145 Shopkeeper 19 Subtotal 449 Total 507 Source: AO Architects, March 16, 2023. 1.3.2 Open Space The open space requirements for the Project are outlined in Table 2. As shown, the Project would be required to provide a minimum of 50,990 square feet of private/common open space and 39,066 square feet of publicly accessible open space. The Project's open space components are shown in Tables 3, 4, and 5, and the Project's compliance with all open space requirements is shown in Table 6. As shown, the Project would provide a total of 33,572 square feet of private open space and 76,187 square feet of common open space (a total of 109,759 square feet), exceeding the amount required by 58,769 square feet. The Project would also provide 47,810, exceeding the amount of required by 8,744 square feet. Table 2 Open Space Requirements Site Area: Use Category Project Standard Required sf Private & Common Open Space Parcel 1: Apartments & Shopkeeper 449 units 90 sf/unit 40,410 Parcel 1: Commercial 26,800 sf 10% of total Commercial Area 1,340 Parcel 2: Townhomes 58 units 90 sf/unit 5,200 Total 50,990 Publicl Accessible Open S ace Parcels 1 119,278 sf 10% of Lot Area 27,138 Parcel 2 271,379 sf 10% of Lot Area 11,928 Total 39,066 sf = square feet Source: AO Architects, March 16, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technirol nno,,,,,r-1 — o,1g, let 2023 City Council 38 18 — 472 10/3/2023 Table 3 Private Open Space Provided Unit Type Unit Deck Area (sf) Number of units Total Area (sf) Parcel 1 S1 0 23 0 Al 54 9 486 A2 58 115 6,670 A3 53 63 3,339 A4 55 33 1,815 A5 54 35 1,890 A6 58 7 406 131 53 13 689 B3 58 96 5,568 B6 61 36 2,196 SK1 0 1 0 SK2 58 2 116 SK3 58 1 58 SK4 61 1 61 SK5 61 14 854 Subtotal 24,148 Parcel 2 Plan 1 158 6 948 Plan 2 141 6 846 Plan 3 109 14 1,526 Plan 4 208 20 4,160 Plan 5 162 12 1,944 Subtotal 9,424 Total 33,572 sf = square feet Source: AO Architects, March 16, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechW-1 RAcmn—A— Aiig,let 2023 City Council 39 18 — 473 10/3/2023 Table 4 Common Open Space Provided Area Type Total Area (sf) Parcel 1 Courtyard A — Apartment Pool 11,851 Courtyard B — Entertainment 6,311 Courtyard C — The "Backyards" 4,994 Courtyard D — The "Backyards" 5,642 Roof Terrace 9,500 Fitness 2,410 Lounge 1,656 Clubroom 1.655 Subtotal 44,019 Parcel 2 Townhome pool Courtyard 8,934 Pool Amenity Building 580 Subtotal 9,514 Total 76,187 sf = square feet Source: AO Architects, March 16, 2023. Table 5 Publicity Accessible Open Space Area Type Total Area Required (sf) Town Center Plaza 15,927 Shopkeeper Plaza 4,253 Co-Work+Shopkeeper Along Cabrillo Park Drive 3,756 Parkcourt Place 14,091 Paseo 9,783 Total 47,810 sf =square feet Source: AO Architects, March 16, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Tech nir�l hAnmn—nrIi im o,1g, let 2023 City Council 40 18 — 474 10/3/2023 Table 6 Total Open Space Type Total Area Total Area Provided Required (sf) sf Private & Common Open Space 50,990 109,759 (58,769 more than requite Publicly Accessible Open Space 39,066 47,810 (8,744 more than reauiredl sf = square feet Source: AO Architects, March 16, 2023, 1.3.3 Parking The Project's parking requirements are shown in Table 7. As shown in Table 8, the Project would provide a total of 1,014 vehicle spaces, which would include 116 spaces in Parcel 1 and 898 spaces (including 898 residential spaces and 90 nonresidential spaces) in Parcel 2. The Project would also provide 23 on -street parallel parking spaces along the new roadway (Parkcourt Place) separating Parcels 1 and 2. Table 7 Parkina Reauirements Unit Type Number of Units7 Ratio Per Unit Required Spaces Parcel 1 Studios 23 2.0 46 1 bedroom 262 2.0 524 2 bedroom 145 2.0 290 per 19 2.0 38 Subtotal rn 898 Parcel 2 2 bedroom 12 2.0 24 3 bedroom 34 2.0 68 4 bedroom 12 2.0 24 Subtotal 116 Total 1,014 Source: AO Architects, March 16, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technirol nno,,,,,r-1 — o,1g, let 2023 City Council 41 18 — 475 10/3/2023 Table 8 Parking Provided Unit Type Number of Units Ratio Per Unit Required Spaces Parcel 1 Studios 23 2.0 46 1 bedroom 262 2.0 524 2 bedroom 145 2.0 290 Shopkeeper 19 2.0 38 Subtotal 898 Parcel 2 2 bedroom 12 2.2 26 3 bedroom 34 2.2 75 4 bedroom 12 2.2 26 Subtotal 127 Total 1,025 Source: AO Architects, March 16, 2023. 1.3.6 Estimated Construction Schedule The Project's construction phase would occur over an estimated 36-month period. The estimated construction schedule is shown in Table 9. Table 9 Construction Schedule Assumptions Phase Duration Notes Removal of 6,000 tons of demolition debris in 10-cubic yard Demolition Months 1-2 capacity trucks, hauled up to 20 miles to the Olinda Alpha Landfill. Site Preparation Month 3 (one Grubbing and removal of trees, plants, landscaping, weeds week) over a 64,000 square -foot area Grading Months 3-5 Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil hauled 20 miles to Olinda Alpha Landfill in 14-cubic yard capacity trucks. Trenching for utilities, including gas, water, electricity, and Trenching Months 6-8 telecommunications. Paving Months 9-11 Flatwork, including paving of driveways and walkways Footings and foundation work (e.g., pouring concrete pads), Building Construction Months 12-36 framing, welding; installing mechanical, electrical, and plumbing. Floor assembly, cabinetry and carpentry, elevator installations, low voltage systems, trash management. Architectural Coatings Months 33-36 Application of interior and exterior coatings and sealants. Source: Fairfield and DKA Planning, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechQ" nno..,,,r-1— nip - 2023 City Council 42 18 — 476 10/3/2023 1.5 REQUESTED DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS The Applicant is seeking the following discretionary approvals from the City: • Site Plan Review No. 2023-01 • Tentative Tract Map No. 2023-03 Other approvals and permits from the Department of Building and Safety and other municipal agencies would be required for Project construction actions including, but not limited to demolition, excavation, shoring, grading, foundation, building, and tree removal. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana TechQ" nno.,,,,r-Ji- nllpicr 2023 City Council 43 18 — 477 10/3/2023 2. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 2.1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 — Program EIR 2.1.1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 Overview and Requirements CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(a) defines a program EIR as: [A]n EIR which may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project and are related either: (1) Geographically, (2) As logical parts in the chain of contemplated actions, (3) In connection with issuance of rules, regulations, plans, or other general criteria to govern the conduct of a continuing program, or (4) As individual activities carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory authority and having generally similar environmental effects which can be mitigated in similar ways. CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) sets forth criteria to use a program EIR for "later activities." Specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) states the following: (c) Use with Later Activities. Later activities in the program must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. (1) If a later activity would have effects that were not examined in the program EIR, a new Initial Study would need to be prepared leading to either an EIR or a Negative Declaration. That later analysis may tier from the program EIR a provided in Section 15152. (2) If the agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR, and no new environmental document would be required. Whether a later activity is within the scope of a program EIR is a factual question that the lead agency determines based on substantial evidence in the record. Factors that an agency may consider in making that determination include, but are not limited to, consistency of the later activity with the type of allowable land use, overall planned density and building intensity, geographic area analyzed for environmental impacts, and covered infrastructure, as described in the program EIR. (3) An agency shall incorporate feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed in the program EIR into later activities in the program. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 478 10/3/2023 (4) Where the later activities involve site -specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the operation were within the scope of the program EIR. 2.1.2 Applicability of CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 to the Project The Certified EIR meets the definition under Guidelines Section 15168(a) because the Certified EIR analyzed the potential impacts associated with the Overlay Zone, which is a generally applicable plan containing rules, regulations and other general criteria governing a specified geographically contained area. The Certified EIR fully analyzed the potential environmental effects associated with the City's adoption of the Overlay and subsequent foreseeable development within the Overlay Zone. As discussed below, the Project is fully consistent with the Overlay Zone and within the scope of the Certified EIR. The Project Site is located in the Village Center District of the Overlay Zone. Uses allowed in the Village Center District include a mix of commercial, office, and residential in mid -rise buildings of between 4 and 10 stories in a setting that provides open spaces, niches, and areas for gatherings and activities along streets, paseos, and interconnecting walkways that link the Village Center to adjacent districts and nearby public parks north of the Village Center District. The Project meets this description by including development of the Project Site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units (including apartments, live/work units, and townhomes), approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space in accordance with the Development Standards outlined in Table 1 in the Project Description of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. As shown in Figure 3, the Project Site would be separated into two distinct areas by a roadway (Parkcourt Place), which would traverse the site east/west. The northern portion of the Project Site would be developed with eight, three-story (37 feet and 1 inch in height) buildings with 58 townhomes arranged around a central open space area. Each townhome would include two, three, or four bedrooms, a parking garage, and private outdoor space. The southern portion of the Project Site would be developed with a five -story mixed -use building arranged around an internal parking structure and one subterranean level that includes residential storage. This building would include 449 apartment units and 26,800 square feet of ground -floor commercial uses, which could include retail, office, and shopkeeper, and would also surround a central open space area. The Project also includes development of pedestrian infrastructure to connect the Project to adjacent land uses. As demonstrated here, the Project would be consistent with the allowable development under the Overlay Zone. Finally, as demonstrated in Section 4 of this technical memorandum, all applicable mitigation measures from the Certified EIR would be implemented by the Project, and each of the applicable mitigation measures would also be made conditions of approval for the Project. The analysis contained in Section 3 of this technical memorandum demonstrates that pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, there are no Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 479 10/3/2023 substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe significant impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance that has become available that would result in new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required for the Project. Based on the analysis herein and the Certified EIR and the whole of the record, under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, the Project is within the scope of the Housing Element Update and the Certified EIR adequately described the activity for purposes of CEQA. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 480 10/3/2023 3. Revisions to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines 3.1 Introduction The most recent comprehensive revisions to the CEQA Guidelines adopted by the California Natural Resources Agency became effective on December 28, 2018, after the preparation and certification of the Certified EIR. The revisions to the CEQA Guidelines were adopted largely to create efficiencies and to align the CEQA Guidelines with California appellate court and Supreme Court decisions, including changes to Appendix G. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines contains a sample initial study format. The purpose of an initial study is to assist lead agencies in determining whether a project may cause a significant impact on the environment. To help guide that determination, Appendix G asks a series of questions in the form of a checklist regarding a range of environmental resources and potential impacts. When the Appendix G checklist was originally developed, it contained only a handful of questions. Over time, the list of questions has grown in response to increasing awareness of the effects of development on the environment. Currently, the sample checklist contains 89 questions divided into 20 categories of potential impacts. 3.2 Modifications to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines The most recent comprehensive revisions to Appendix G were adopted largely to reduce redundancy, provide additional clarity, and align Appendix G with California appellate court and Supreme Court decisions and changes to the Public Resources Code. An overview of the modifications to Appendix G is provided below by environmental topic. Based on the discussion below, while Appendix G was modified, the modified Appendix G questions that would apply to the Project have been addressed within the Certified EIR. 3.2.1 Aesthetics The Appendix G modifications include updates to aesthetics analysis and provide distinct checklist questions for public views and consistency with zoning regulations governing scenic views, depending upon whether the project is within a non -urbanized or urbanized area. All of the checklist questions as presented in the updated Appendix G checklist are addressed in Section 4.1, Aesthetics, of the Draft EIR. 3.2.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources These checklist questions were not updated as part of the modifications and are responded to in the Initial Study that preceded the Draft EIR and is included in Appendix A of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 481 10/3/2023 3.2.3 Air Quality These checklist questions were modified to delete Checklist Question Ill.b regarding violation of air quality standards and to modify the question regarding odors. All of the checklist questions as presented in the updated Appendix G checklist are addressed in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.4 Biological Resources Checklist Question IV.c was modified to remove the reference to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This modification does not affect the analysis of biological resources provided in Section 4.3, Biological Resources, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.5 Cultural Resources These modifications consisted of a minor word change to Checklist Question V.a and moving Checklist Question V.c from the cultural resources subsection to the geology subsection of Appendix G. Impacts on cultural resources are addressed in Section 4.4, Cultural Resources, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.6 Energy The modifications included creating a separate subsection for energy and also incorporating language from Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. These added checklist questions have already been addressed in Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.7 Geology and Soils These checklist questions were modified to focus on both the direct and indirect impacts associated with geology and soils and to move the analysis of paleontological resources to this topic (from the cultural resources section). Impacts on geology and soils are fully addressed in Section 4.5, Geology and Soils, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. Further, impacts with respect to paleontological resources are addressed in Section 4.4, Cultural Resources, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions This topic was not included in the 2006 CEQA Guidelines, and therefore the Certified EIR did not include analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, both the existence and potential impacts of carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions from fossil fuel combustion and other activities were known and understood at the time the Certified EIR was certified. Therefore, potential GHG impacts do not constitute new information that would require a subsequent EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 482 10/3/2023 Despite being omitted from the Certified EIR, an analysis of potential impacts related to the Project's GHG emissions is included in this document. 3.2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials These checklist questions were revised to delete Checklist Question Vlll.f regarding safety hazards associated with proximity to a private airstrip and to clarify that Checklist Question VIILg (formerly Checklist Question Vlll.h) includes both direct or indirect impacts associated with wildland fires. All of the checklist questions as presented in the updated Appendix G checklist are addressed in Section 4.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality These checklist questions were revised to provide clarification and eliminate redundancy. All of the topics addressed in these checklist questions, including those related to water quality, groundwater, flooding, and flood hazards, are thoroughly addressed in Section 4.7, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.11 Land Use and Planning Checklist Question Ka (introduce new land uses that would result in conflicts of use) was removed prior to the 2018 revisions. Checklist Question X.c was revised to focus on conflicts with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Checklist Question X.d was deleted, as it addressed habitat conservation plans, which are already addressed under the biological resources checklist questions. An analysis of the Project's consistency with land use plans, policies, and regulations is provided in Section 4.8, Land Use and Planning, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.12 Mineral Resources These checklist questions were not updated as part of the modifications and are responded to in the Initial Study that preceded the Draft EIR and is included in Appendix A of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.13 Noise Checklist Questions Xll.a and Xll.b were revised to focus on impacts associated with the generation of noise and vibration noise levels. In addition, Checklist Questions Xll.c, Xll.d, and Xll.f were deleted, as they were redundant, and Checklist Question XI I.e was revised accordingly. The topics associated with these modified questions are fully addressed in Section 4.9, Noise, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 483 10/3/2023 3.2.14 Population and Housing Checklist Question Xlll.a was clarified to focus on potential impacts associated with unplanned growth, and Checklist Questions Xlll.b and Xlll.c were combined. The topics in these modified questions are fully addressed in Section 4.10, Population, Housing, and Employment, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.15 Public Services These checklist questions were not updated as part of the modifications and are responded to in Sections 4.11, Public Services, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.16 Recreation These questions were not updated as part of the modifications and are responded to in Section 4.11, Public Services, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.17 Transportation Checklist Questions XVI.a (level of service [LOS] analysis), XVI.b (CMP analysis), XVI.c (air traffic patterns), and XVI.f (parking) were deleted. None of these issues are addressed for the Project in this document. The LOS analysis was replaced with a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis to address consistency with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). Although a VMT analysis was not required under the 2006 CEQA Guidelines, impacts associated with VMT were known of and understood at the time the Certified EIR was certified and therefore do not constitute new information. Despite being omitted from the Certified EIR, and the lead agency's decision to evaluate transportation impact consistency based on LOS, an analysis of the Project's VMT impacts is included in this document in response to public comments received for informational purposes only. Further, the former Checklist Question XVI.d (now Checklist Question XVI.c) was revised to add "geometric" for clarity. With the exception of VMT, all of the topics addressed in these questions were addressed in Section 4.12, Transportation and Traffic, of the Draft EIR. 3.2.18 Tribal Cultural Resources Assembly Bill (AB) 52 went into effect on July 1, 2015, and requires that for a project for which a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for a Draft EIR was filed on or after July 1, 2015, the lead agency is required to consult with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project, if: (1) the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic area; and (2) the tribe requests consultation, prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration or environmental impact report for a project. The NOP for the Certified EIR was released on March 10, 2006, and as such, the lead agency was not required to comply with the requirements of AB 52. The Final Certified EIR was released in 2007, and thus, did not include responses to the updated Appendix G questions related to tribal cultural resources. Although AB 52 consultation was not required for the Certified EIR, the potential impacts related Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 484 10/3/2023 to tribal resources were known and understood at the time the Certified EIR was certified. Despite being omitted from the Certified EIR, an analysis of the Project's impacts on tribal resources is included in this document. Per Public Resources Code 21080.3.1, AB 52 tribal consultation is only required prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report. Because the Project relies on the Certified EIR, no negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report will be released. Therefore, AB 52 tribal consultation is not required for the Project. 3.2.19 Utilities and Service Systems These checklist questions were revised to reduce redundancy. Specifically, Checklist Question XVlll.a was eliminated, as wastewater treatment was already addressed in former Checklist Question XVlll.e (now Checklist Question XVlll.c). In addition, former Checklist Questions XVlll.b and XVlll.c were combined to address all infrastructure types in one question (now Checklist Question XVlll.a) and to include the addition of telecommunications. Former Checklist Question XVI Il.d regarding water supply was also updated to clarify that the analysis of water supply should include reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years. Former Checklist Questions XVlll.f and XVlll.g regarding solid waste impacts were also clarified. With the exception of telecommunications, all of the topics addressed in these questions were addressed in Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. 3.2.20 Wildfire New Checklist Question XX. Wildfire pertains to projects that are located in, or near, state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. The Project Site is not located in or near state responsibility areas, nor is the Project Site located in a City -designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Therefore, these questions are not applicable to the Project. However, this topic was addressed in Section 4.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 485 10/3/2023 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The information below addresses each of the environmental issues that were previously analyzed in the Certified EIR issue area for the purpose of describing how the Project is within the scope of the Overlay Zone that was analyzed in the Certified EIR, would not result in any new significant impacts, and would not increase the severity of the significant impacts identified in the Certified EIR. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(4), a modified Environmental Checklist Form was used to compare the anticipated environmental effects of the Project with those analyzed and disclosed in the Certified EIR and to review whether any of the conditions set forth in PRC 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR have been triggered. This analysis provides the following information as to each of the impact thresholds analyzed in each of the impact categories: Impact Determination in the EIR. This column sets forth the impact determination made in the Certified EIR for each impact threshold. Any Substantial Changes Involving New Significant Impacts or a Substantial Increase in the Severity of Significant Impacts? Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether the changes represented by the Project will result in new significant impacts that have not already been considered and mitigated by the measures in the Certified EIR or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. Any Substantially Changed Circumstances Involving New Significant Impacts or a Substantial Increase in the Severity of Significant Impacts? Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether there have been substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken (e.g., changes to the Project Site or vicinity) that have occurred subsequent to the preparation of the Certified EIR, which would result in the Project having a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. Any New Information of Substantial Importance? Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(3)(A-D) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Certified EIR was certified, shows that: (A) the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Certified EIR; or (B) that significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the Certified EIR; or (C) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) that mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the Certified EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 486 10/3/2023 proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. New studies completed as part of this environmental review are attached to this technical memorandum or are on file with the Planning Department. Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts. Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether the prior environmental document provides mitigation measures to address effects in the related impact category. In some cases, the mitigations have already been implemented. Discussion and Mitigation Sections. A discussion of the elements of the checklist is provided under each environmental category in order to clarify and provide support for the answers. The discussion provides information about the particular environmental issue, how the Project relates to the issue, and the status of any mitigation that may be required or that has already been implemented. Applicable mitigation measures from the Certified EIR that apply to the Project are listed under each environmental category. Conclusions. A discussion of the conclusion relating to the analysis is contained in each section. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 487 10/3/2023 4.1 Aesthetics Issues (and supporting Information Sources) Impact Determination in EIR Any Substantial Changes Involving New Significant Impacts or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any Substantially Changed Circumstances Involving New Significant Impact or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Information of Substantial Importance? Project Incorporates Mitigation Measure(s)? AESTHETICS: Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: (a) Have a substantial adverse effect Less Than No No No No on a scenic vista? Significant (b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock No Impact No No No No outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (c) In non -urbanized area, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from Less Than No No No No publicly accessible vantage Significant point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? (d) Create a new source of Less Than substantial light or glare which Significant with No No No Yes would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Mitigation 4.1.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Scenic Resources The Certified EIR stated, the City does not have any State- or County -designated scenic highways, nor are there any state- or County -designated scenic highways located nearby. Although First and Fourth Streets are designated as local scenic corridors, these are addressed below under Scenic Resources. Consequently, implementation of the Overlay Zone would not substantially damage scenic resources within a State scenic highway, and no significant impacts would occur. Scenic Vista The Certified EIR stated that for purposes of this analysis, "scenic resources" can include natural open spaces, topographic formations, and landscapes. Many people associate natural Iandforms and landscapes with scenic resources, such as oak woodlands, lakes, rivers, streams, and some historical areas. Scenic resources can also include urban open spaces and the built environment. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 488 10/3/2023 Examples of these would include parks, trails, pathways, nature centers, archaeological, historical resources, and architectural features. With respect to the Overlay Zone area, First Street and Fourth Street qualify as scenic resources under this definition due to their local designation as major city entries within the Scenic Corridors Element of the City's General Plan. The Overlay Zone seeks to provide an integrated and revitalized urban area and would guide the future development and improvements of the Overlay Zone area through implementation of the associated development standards. Development under the Overlay Zone would introduce development forms and uses that will provide for the creation of a high -intensity, mixed -use urban village within a previously developed mid -rise to high-rise office environment. The majority of the Overlay Zone is developed. However, the Overlay Zone would establish the framework for a new development pattern in the area through the re -use and revitalization of existing uses. Implementation of the Overlay Zone would serve to guide future development in the Overlay Zone such that the physical design of the proposed uses would enhance the visual character and quality of the area. The Overlay Zone is divided into four distinct districts: the Neighborhood Transitional District, the Village Center District, the Active Urban District, and the Office District. These four districts would contain varying mixtures of building heights and aesthetic characteristics to create a vibrant urban mixed -use area in the heavily traveled eastern entryway of the City. New structures could range in height from one or two stories, up to 20+ stories. Future development within the Overlay Zone would provide an effective new gateway into the City and could provide a prominent skyline of taller buildings. Both visual attributes would help signify a new, distinctive identity for the City. The varying heights and massing of new buildings would provide a distinctive skyline with planar changes that would create visual interest in the area. The inclusion of ground -floor commercial space at strategic locations, as well as a highly -integrated pedestrian system throughout the Overlay Zone area would also create an internal physical and visual connection for pedestrians with adjacent mixed -use buildings, where one does not exist. Existing views of the Overlay Zone are primarily available from adjacent commercial and office uses, as well as from portions of First Street, Fourth Street, Interstate 5, State Route 55, and Tustin Avenue. Limited views of the Overlay Zone are available from the residential uses to the north. The existing views of the area could be significantly altered with the introduction of revitalized development. Views of the project site from the 1-5, SR-55, and First and Fourth Streets would be most significantly altered, as the Overlay Zone area as a whole is most visible when traveling along these routes. Sensitive receptors located near the Overlay Zone area include residences adjacent to the northern boundary of the Overlay Zone area, north of Sixth Street. Under the Overlay Zone, the Neighborhood Transitional District would frame the northern boundary of the Overlay Zone area, and the scale and design of buildings in this area would reflect the relationship to the adjacent residential uses. Specifically, this district is intended to provide opportunities for low -intensity development that acts as a transition between single-family residential uses to the north and the Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 489 10/3/2023 adjacent high -intensity Active Urban District and Village Center to the south. Designated for the lowest scale and the lowest intensity of uses in the Overlay Zone, development in this district is limited to residential, live/work, or office uses, generally between two and three stories in height. New development in this area would be designed to provide an appropriate interface with high levels of landscaping and design features that minimize impacts to adjacent single family residential areas. In addition to new buildings, implementation of the Overlay Zone could also include the extension of some roads that would provide more views of the area, which are not currently available. Specifically, the Overlay Zone would extend Circle Center Drive to the north, which would intersect with the new extension of Park Court Place (from Cabrillo Park Drive to Parkcenter Drive). In addition, Parkcenter Drive would extend south of Fourth Street to the intersection of First Street, and a new roadway between First and Fourth Streets would extend from Cabrillo Park Drive to Parkcenter Drive. With the incorporation of these street extensions, new views could be afforded of the Overlay Zone for motorists and pedestrians because the bridging of these streets would minimize the existing visual and physical barriers between the proposed districts. Although future development would incorporate a range of architectural styles, building heights, and massing, the Overlay Zone would provide a visual entryway of the City from multiple locations, including along First and Fourth Streets, as well as from the 1-5 and SR-55 freeways. Specifically, a new skyline of varying building forms and heights would be created along these major thoroughfares by the new development and would not degrade views from adjacent roadways or uses. Under the Overlay Zone, the new design guidelines are intended to create a unified identity within the area, with buildings that are compatible in scale, design, character, quality, and style. While some portions of the Overlay Zone area are more visually prominent than others due to location of streets and existing view corridors, development standards of the Overlay Zone would ensure that each future development project includes appropriate site planning, unique architecture, high -quality building materials, extensive indoor and outdoor amenities and first-rate public improvements. Essentially, the Overlay Zone would ensure that form, height, and treatment of buildings would reinforce the prominence and role of major urban spaces and streets. Thus, although future development would include high-rise buildings, the height, bulk, architecture, and/or signage would not degrade the visual unity of the area. The addition of open space, and landscape and streetscape improvements throughout the Overlay Zone would also improve the aesthetics of the overall area and create a pedestrian - friendly environment that could include widened sidewalks, bike paths, street trees, and street furniture. Thus, the Overlay Zone would provide the area with a set of improvement and development standards that enhance the current level of aesthetics associated with the area. Upon its adoption, future development in the Overlay Zone area would be guided by and be in conformance with the development standards of the Overlay Zone, which would result in new buildings with common architectural design and that would be compatible in scale, mass, and density. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 490 10/3/2023 As mentioned previously, the Overlay Zone area currently consists of a variety of low -scale office and commercial structures, with the exception of limited vacant parcels and a few newer structures in the western portion of the area (e.g., the Xerox Building). Although long-term visual characteristics of the Overlay Zone area would be altered with development under the Overlay Zone, it would visually enhance the area and provide the City with a distinctive entryway identity. Further, the intensification of the Overlay Zone is consistent with the City's intent of the Major Development Area, which calls for high intensity, high -quality projects. Project implementation would also create contiguous landscaped pedestrian areas throughout the area in order to promote active street life. Thus, although views of the Overlay Zone area would be modified, the Overlay Zone would not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surrounding. Rather, development under the Overlay Zone would contribute to the image of and add to the aesthetic quality of the City of Santa Ana. As such, development under the Overlay Zone would not degrade the existing visual quality of the area or obstruct key existing views and/or vistas in the vicinity. This impact was determined to be less than significant. Visual Character Construction The Certified EIR stated that although construction activities would take place primarily within the Overlay Zone, these visual impacts could affect surrounding land uses to the south and east. Automobiles traveling along Tustin Avenue, Sixth Street, and the 1-5 and SR-55 freeways could have short-term views of the Overlay Zone during construction activities. In addition, motorists and pedestrians in the vicinity of intersections at which roadway improvements would occur would have views of construction associated with project improvements. However, these visual conditions would be temporary visual distractions typically associated with construction activities and commonly encountered in developed areas. In addition, the City's building codes require screening and pedestrian protection for sidewalks during construction activities. Therefore, this short-term impact was determined to be less than significant. Operation The Overlay Zone would facilitate development of a high -quality urban village consisting of residential, office, commercial, service, and entertainment uses within a community of street and sidewalk -facing individual buildings on urban blocks separated by streets, sidewalks, pedestrian paseos, and courtyards. Underutilized areas would be redeveloped with an integrated design intended to foster architectural quality and variety, community connections, landscape buffers, and pedestrian -oriented uses. A variety of massing and forms would be encouraged to introduce variety at the ground plane and skyline of the Overlay Zone area. The overall scale and massing of development would transition from the one- to two-story scale of the existing residential community to the north to a higher intensity adjacent to the 1-5, located west and south of the Overlay Zone. To create a varied skyline and enhance the form of the Overlay Zone area, taller buildings and distinct tower elements that rise from a lower base of three Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 491 10/3/2023 stories and higher would be encouraged within the Active Urban district. Per the general design principals provided for the Overlay Zone, development on sites throughout the Overlay Zone would encourage connections and linkages to other sites in the Overlay Zone area and surrounding community amenities, while individual building typologies and unit designs would facilitate pedestrian activity and visual connectivity with surrounding development through active sidewalks. To establish interaction between the properties and reinforce the long-term development of the Overlay Zone area as a pedestrian -friendly mixed -use urban village, community- and neighborhood -serving commercial uses would be permitted along Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive in the area specifically designated to establish a pedestrian linkage between First and Fourth Street. These linkages would be enhanced throughout the district by a strong emphasis to provide on -site publicly accessible open spaces and amenities. To further establish human scale and interest and a sense of urban variety and liveliness, architectural diversity with regard to unit types, building types, massing, forms and styles would be strongly encouraged. One of the primary intents of the Overlay Zone is to guide new development that enhances the overall image of the Overlay Zone area as an exciting destination for visitors and residents. Pedestrian activity would be encouraged, and new development would include public open spaces and increased or improved landscaping. Urban design concepts include small urban plazas, street closing for special events, upgrading alleys as paseos, and dedicating portions of wide sidewalks for social and recreational uses. All new development is expected to be sensitive to existing places and character in the Overlay Zone and surrounding area. In addition, as discussed above under Scenic Vistas, the Overlay Zone includes a gateway and entries concept to further define entries to and definition of, the Overlay Zone area. The incorporation of new landscaping within the Overlay Zone would provide an additional visual enhancement to the Santa Ana area. New landscaping will occur as new developments are implemented throughout the Overlay Zone and serve to soften and buffer views of the proposed structures. New landscaping features would include potted plants, mature trees, turf surfaces, outdoor furniture, decorative lighting, and other amenities intended to add variety and contribute to a sense of human scale. Plantings would include both new, mature specimen trees, and relocated trees. Other design guidelines and requirements in the Overlay Zone will help ensure maximum compatibility of design, minimization of light and glare, promote pedestrian -friendly entries and uses, and promote the use of compatible exterior materials. In general, the new development projects that would be introduced would serve to improve the aesthetic character of the Overlay Zone given the architectural design guidelines required for the new developments, the use of design elements, such as landscaped view corridors, and walkways; and the new landscape features to be implemented. Additionally, supporting infrastructure, such as telecommunications equipment and utility lines, will be appropriately screened from view or placed underground. In general, implementation of the Overlay Zone would enhance the visual character of the area through the guidelines and standards described above. Although future development could result Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 492 10/3/2023 in taller buildings in certain districts compared to existing uses, the overall changes that are proposed would be designed to create visually attractive and compatible uses. Additionally, future development would be required to adhere to policies identified in the City's General Plan Elements, as identified in the Regulatory Framework. Consequently, future development under the Overlay Zone would improve the existing visual character, and this impact was determined to be less than significant. Light and Glare Daytime Glare Implementation of the Overlay Zone, which entails development of commercial, residential, and office uses, could affect daytime views from adjacent sensitive land uses, such as residential neighborhoods located to the north along Sixth Street, to the west along Elk Street, and to the southeast of the Overlay Zone. Future development under the proposed Overlay Zone will create new sources of light and glare in the Overlay Zone. The Overlay Zone will result in greater intensity and density of development over that which exists, resulting in a greater potential for light and glare impacts. Artificial lighting will accompany all new development, including exterior lighting for parking lots, signs, walkways, and interior lighting which could be visible outside. Thus, some areas may experience an increase in lighting with future development. High -intensity structures will also cause spillover light to adjacent lots. Glare from reflective surfaces will occur with developments that use mirrors, bright lights, and other reflective surfaces for building facades. Generally, light poles and exterior lighting which spillover to adjacent properties may be considered adverse if these properties are considered light-sensitive uses, such as residential homes, hospitals, or nursing homes. In addition, driveway design, which directs vehicle headlights into sensitive land uses, could have adverse impacts. The use of reflective surfaces and facades on buildings could also create glare impacts on motorists driving along the surrounding streets. Avoidance of these design features can reduce adverse light and glare impacts. While daytime glare is currently at a minimum in the Overlay Zone, glare could be produced by the increased amount of surface area of the proposed commercial and retail structures, which could reflect or concentrate sunlight and result in a potentially significant impact. However, implementation of design features required by Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.1-1, including the use of non -reflective textured surfaces on building exteriors, as well as avoidance of the use of reflective glass, will ensure no significant impacts to off -site uses resulting from daytime glare from new development will occur. Ambient Light Implementation of the Overlay Zone would result in the redevelopment, intensification, and reuse of existing office or commercial uses, as well as development of limited vacant parcels. Nighttime lighting would be included in future project development in a variety of forms including: security Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 493 10/3/2023 lighting; street and parking area lighting; interior lighting for commercial, retail stores/restaurants and residential uses; as well as increased vehicle headlights due to the intensified uses in the Overlay Zone. It should be noted that no high -intensity lighting (e.g., sports field lighting) is currently anticipated within the Overlay Zone. Although the St. Jeanne De Lestonnac School has a sports field, this land use is not located within the Overlay Zone. Due to the urbanized nature of the surrounding area, a significant amount of ambient nighttime light currently exists, reducing the views of stars and affecting views of the nighttime sky. Thus, the increase in nighttime light that would occur under the Overlay Zone would not significantly affect nighttime views of the sky (ability to see stars) because such views are already limited in city settings. Therefore, the impact related to ambient nighttime light was determined to be less than significant. Spillover Light New development in the Overlay Zone would introduce new and potentially substantial sources of nighttime lighting. Lighting would be used to highlight architectural elements, landscaping, and building tenant and project signage. In addition, security and safety lighting would be provided in parking areas, service passages, and common areas utilized by employees and visitors during and after commercial operating hours. Further, because minimal nighttime traffic is present in the Overlay Zone, increased vehicular traffic could result in more opportunities for vehicular headlights to affect surrounding residences. The increase in the Overlay Zone lighting could potentially affect adjacent uses if new buildings were developed next to existing sensitive uses (i.e., residential uses) that do not experience impacts from existing lighting sources or if tall buildings included significant neon lighting or lighted signs. The nearest residential neighborhood is located immediately adjacent to the northern boundary of the Overlay Zone. As discussed above in Impact 4.1-1, the Neighborhood Transitional District would frame the northern boundary of the Overlay Zone area, and the scale and design of buildings in this area would reflect the relationship to the adjacent residential uses. Building heights would range between two- and three- stories, and development in this area would be specifically designed to provide an appropriate interface with high levels of landscaping and design features to minimize impacts to the adjacent residential area to the north. The Overlay Zone would provide outdoor lighting standards that aim to prevent impacts on surrounding residential uses. Although the Overlay Zone would provide outdoor light standards, future development could create light pollution disturbances which do not exist. Depending on the location and design specifications of lighting on future buildings, lighting could present a potentially significant Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.1-2 and MM-OZ 4.1-3 will ensure these lighting impacts will be less than significant. Shade/Shadow The current low-rise buildings within the Overlay Zone create limited shade and shadow patterns that are contained within close proximity to each low- to mid -rise building. In the Overlay Zone Active Urban District, shadows cast by existing on -site development are more extensive. Future development of new multi -story buildings in the Overlay Zone may create new sources of shading Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 494 10/3/2023 that could impact shadow -sensitive uses in the vicinities of the new development sites. Due to the programmatic nature of this EIR, specific project -level design plans (including building heights, positioning, and dimensions) were not available at the time the Certified EIR was prepared, and a complete assessment of shade and shadow impacts of proposed development under the Overlay Zone was not possible. In the future when specific development projects are proposed within the Overlay Zone, project design plans will be developed and subject to project -level CEQA review. The project -level design plans will be evaluated, as necessary, to determine the extent of potential shade and shadow impacts upon adjacent shadow -sensitive uses. Typically, a variety of criteria are used to determine the significance of a shadow impact, including the following: • Affected land use (criticality of direct sunlight for the use) • Duration (hours per day in shadow) • Time of day (critical time period for direct sunlight) • Season (time of year use would be shadowed) • Extent (percentage of use that would be shadowed) • Type (solid or dappled shadow) • Preexisting condition (shadow condition due to existing buildings, landscaping, or other features) With these criteria as a basis for shadow impact analysis, Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.1-4 shall be applied to future development in the Overlay Zone. Therefore, future development would be required to adhere to the significance criteria for shade and shadow impacts identified in Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.1-4. To ensure that future projects comply with these standards, development would require individual shade and shadow analyses, as identified above, and compliance would be further ensured by Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.1- 3, which requires the applicant to submit a lighting plan to the Planning Division for review and approval. Therefore, because future development in the Overlay Zone would be required to adhere to significance criteria for shade and shadow impacts, this impact was determined to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.1-1 Proposed new structures shall be designed to maximize the use of textured or other non -reflective exterior surfaces and non -reflective glass. MM-OZ 4.1-2 All exterior lighting and advertising (including signage) shall be directed onto the specific location intended for illumination (e.g., parking lots, driveways, and walkways) and shielded away from adjacent properties and public rights -of - way to minimize light spillover onto adjacent areas. MM-OZ 4.1-3 Prior to issuance of a Site Development Permit for each specific development project, the applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The plan shall specify the lighting type and placement to ensure that the effects of security and other outdoor lighting are minimized on Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 495 10/3/2023 adjacent uses and do not create spillover effects. The plan shall specifically incorporate the following design features: • All projects shall incorporate project design features to shield light and/or glare from vehicles entering or exiting parking lots and structures that face sensitive uses (e.g., schools, hospitals, senior housing, or other residential properties) by providing barriers so that light from vehicle headlights would not illuminate off -site sensitive uses • All projects shall incorporate project design features to provide landscaping, physical barriers, screening, or other buffers to minimize project -generated illumination from entering off -site areas and to prevent glare or interference with vehicular traffic, in accordance with the City's Municipal Code. MM-OZ 4.1-4 Prior to issuance of a building permit each project shall be required to perform a shade and shadow analysis that demonstrates that the project will not result in significant impacts according to the following criteria. Shadowing impacts in the Overlay Zone are considered significant when shadows would be cast upon potentially sensitive uses during a substantial portion (greater than 50 percent) of the main daylight hours (9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. during the fall, winter, and spring seasons, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. [daylight savings time] during the summer season). Light-sensitive uses are those that depend upon light for their operation (e.g., solar panels) or for which solar access is essential for their function (e.g., swimming pools). Light-sensitive uses also include public parks, residences, and routinely useable outdoor spaces associated with residences (e.g., yards). 4.1.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope, including height, considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. As demonstrated below, the Project would incorporate the applicable mitigation measures identified in the Certified EIR and would not result in any new or increased significant aesthetics impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Replacing development at the Project Site, a majority of which is a parking lot, with a mixed -use development constructed with high -quality materials and containing publicly accessible open Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 496 10/3/2023 space would improve the visual character of the Project Site. The City has conducted a Site Plan Review of the Project to confirm that the Project complies with all zoning and development standards of the Overlay Zone. The City has made the following findings: Finding 1: That the proposed development plan is consistent with and will further the objectives that are outlined in Section 1.2 for the MEMU. Project Compliance: The Project will create a new mixed -use development within close proximity to office buildings, Cabrillo Park, Mabury Park, and less than two miles from Downtown Santa Ana, that provides additional opportunities to live, work, and play. The Project includes two distinct market -rate housing product types, including a townhouse development and mixed -use residential development. Each townhouse building will be three -stories in height, while the mixed - use building will be five stories with ground floor commercial/retail and residential units on upper floors, wrapped around a 6.5-level parking structure. The height of the buildings will blend in with the heights of the nearby office buildings, which range from single -story, three-story and eight -story buildings. The Project will be built to California Building Code standards, which include energy and water conservation measures and will improve pedestrian mobility by providing new sidewalks and parkways along Fourth Street and Parkcourt Place. In addition, the publicly accessible linear park along Parkcourt Place will serve as a link to the Cabrillo Park to the north. Each residential unit will have storage opportunities for personal bicycles. Additionally, public transit bus service is provided in the Project Site area by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Four OCTA bus routes operate within the vicinity of the Project Site on First Street, Fourth Street, Seventeenth Street, and Tustin Avenue, which consists of the following: OCTA routes 60, 64, 71, and 463. The commercial space has been designed with retail floor heights of approximately 20 feet with storefronts that will be visible from Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. In addition, the commercial space links directly to an on -site public plaza at the corner of Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive which will include outdoor dining opportunities, decorative hardscape, specimen trees and plantings, umbrellas, seating and lawn games. In addition, the ground floor residential units along Parkcourt Place will have doors and patios with direct access to the street to help activate the street. Finding 2: That the proposed development plan is consistent with the development standards specified in section 4 of the MEMU. Project Compliance: The Project is consistent with the development standards specified in Section 4 of the MEMU including land use, height, minimum development site area, building frontages, publicly accessible open space, private/common open space, building setbacks, and parking and access. The Project is a mixed -use development that has been well designed to fit within the Village Center District. Further, the access and egress for the Project has been Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 497 10/3/2023 thoroughly review by the Public works Agency for compliance with all applicable development standards. Finding 3: The proposed development plan is designed to be compatible with adjacent development in terms of similarity of scale, height, and site configuration and otherwise achieves the objectives of the Design Principles specified in Section 5 of the MEMU. Project Compliance: The Project is consistent with the development standards specified in Section 5 of the MEMU. The building is designed with a high -quality design that includes varied massing, changes in form, and comprises high -quality materials including a light sand stucco exterior, fiber cement panel siding, metal railings, aluminum storefronts, brick veneer, metal canopies, and high -quality architectural detailing (e.g., exterior lighting, entry doors, fenestration, etc.). During the development review process, City staff provided extensive design comments, which resulted in higher -quality building materials, an increase in the commercial square footage, and building elevations that are architecturally detailed and designed to be pedestrian -oriented. The commercial storefronts are enhanced with cornices and metal canopies and the primary access to the commercial uses will be from Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. The Project promotes pedestrian activity with landscaping and publicly accessible open space. Finding 4: That the land uses, site design, and operational considerations in the proposed development plan have been planned in a manner that will result in a compatible and harmonious operation as specified in Section 7 of the MEMU. Project Compliance: The Project is consistent with the development standards specified in Section 7 of the MEMU. The Project has been designed to ensure compatibility between the residential and non-residential uses on site. The commercial uses have separate entrances from the residential uses, and the parking management plan will manage parking between the residential and non-residential uses. On -site lighting will be consistent with Chapter 8 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The Project would implement the mitigation measures identified in the Certified EIR. MM-OZ 4.4- 1, which requires maximum use of non -reflective materials, will minimize potential glare. In compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.1-3, the Applicant will prepare a lighting plan that demonstrates the Project will minimize potential impacts related spillover light. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to light and glare beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. 4.1.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to the aesthetic or visual environment have occurred since certification of the Certified EIR, and no substantial new scenic resources have been identified within the vicinity of the Project Site that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 498 10/3/2023 4.1.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to visual or aesthetic resources that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.1.5 EIR's Mitigation Measures Addressing Impact The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.1-1, MM-OZ 4.1-2, MM-OZ 4.1-3, and MM-OZ 4.1-4. 4.1.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant aesthetics impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified aesthetic impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the Project does not meet the conditions for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 499 10/3/2023 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources Any Substantial Changes Involving New Significant Impact Impacts or Issues (and supporting Determination Substantially More Information Sources) in EIR Severe Impacts? Any Substantially Changed Circumstances Involving New Significant Impact or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Project Information of Incorporates Substantial Mitigation Importance? Measure(s)? AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: Would the project: (a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the No Impact No No No No Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural No Impact No No No No use, or a Williamson Act contract? (c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public No Impact No No No No Resources Code 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? (d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of No Impact No No No No forest land to non -forest use? (e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of No Impact No No No No Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? 4.2.1 Impact Determination in the EIR The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone would not result in any impacts related to agricultural resources, because there are not agricultural or forest land located within the Overlay Zone area. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 500 10/3/2023 Mitigation Measures None required. 4.2.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? There still is no agricultural or forest land located within the Overlay Zone area, including the Project Site. The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to agricultural resources beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. 4.2.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to agriculture and forestry resources have occurred and no new agricultural or forestry resources have been identified within the vicinity of the Project since certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.2.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to agricultural or forestry resources that would result in new or more severe significant impacts. 4.2.5 EIR's Mitigation Measures Addressing Impact None identified and none required. 4.2.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts to agricultural or forestry resources would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the Project does not meet the conditions for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 501 10/3/2023 4.3 Air Quality Any Substantially Changed Any Substantial Circumstances Changes Involving Involving New New Significant Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Impacts or or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination Substantially More More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Severe Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? AIR QUALITY: Would the project: (a) Conflict with or obstruct Less Than implementation of Significant No No No No the applicable air quality plan? (b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for Significant and which the project Unavoidable No No No Yes region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? (c) Expose sensitive receptors to Less Than No No No No substantial pollutant Significant concentrations? (d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to Less Than odors) adversely Significant With No No No Yes affecting a Mitigation substantial number of people? 3.3.1 Impact Determination in the EIR AQMP Consistency The Certified EIR stated that the 2003 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which was applicable at the time the Certified EIR was certified, was prepared to accommodate growth, to reduce the high levels of pollutants within the areas under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and to return clean air to the region. Projects that are considered to be consistent with the AQMP would not interfere with attainment, because this growth is included in the projections used to formulate the AQMP. Therefore, projects, uses, and activities that are consistent with the applicable assumptions used in the development of the AQMP would not jeopardize attainment of the air quality levels identified in the AQMP, even if they exceed the SCAQMD's recommended daily emissions thresholds. Projects that are consistent with the projections of employment and population forecasts identified in the Growth Management Chapter of SCAG's 1996 Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 502 10/3/2023 (RCPG) are considered consistent with the AQMP growth projections. This is because the Growth Management Chapter of the 1996 RCPG forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. Implementation of the Overlay Zone would introduce new residential housing which would directly induce population growth within the Overlay Zone. As a result, the Overlay Zone would result in an estimated direct population increase of 11,102 residents. Population projections for the City assumed a population increase of 16,905 residents between the years 2005 and 2030. As implementation of the Overlay Zone would result in increased population that is within that projected for the City, the proposed residential development would not result in an exceedance by the City for either SCAG or General Plan population projections because SCAG's regional growth forecasts are based upon, among other things, land uses specified in city general plans. As the AQMP is based on SCAG growth projections, the Overlay Zone would be consistent with the AQMP population growth projections. SCAG projections indicate an increase of up to 13,394 employees in the City from 2005-2030. The Overlay Zone could generate up to 2,343 employment positions and would not substantially affect the employment forecasts within the City. By generating approximately 2,343 long-term employment positions, the Overlay Zone would contribute only an incremental portion to this growth in employment. Therefore, the employment that would be generated by implementation of the Overlay Zone has been accounted for in previous growth projections, and the Overlay Zone would not result in any increase in employment not accounted for in the General Plan. The employment growth resulting from the Overlay Zone would be consistent with SCAG's employment forecasts for the City. Therefore, the Overlay Zone would be consistent with the AQMP employment forecasts for Los Angeles County. Based on the consistency of the Overlay Zone with the existing SCAG population and employment projections and the AQMP forecasts, as discussed above, the Overlay Zone would not impair implementation of the AQMP, and this impact was determined to be less than significant. No mitigation measures were required. Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in Criteria Pollutant Construction As stated in the Certified EIR, implementation of the Overlay Zone would likely generate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxide (NOX) that exceed established SCAQMD thresholds. Further environmental review will be required as on a site -specific basis to make a determination of contribution of air emissions from individual projects. If a site -specific review of the future development projects occurring within the Overlay Zone identifies potentially significant air quality impacts associated with construction activities, Mitigation Measures MM- OZ 4.2-2 through MM-OZ 4.2-16 would be implemented to reduce these emissions. While implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.2-2 through MM-OZ 4.2-16 would reduce construction -related emissions, they may not reduce these emissions to levels below the SCAQMD thresholds for each individual development project, as the amount of Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 503 10/3/2023 emissions generated for each project would vary depending on its size, the land area that would need to be disturbed during construction, and the length of the construction schedule. Under these conditions, no further feasible mitigation measures are available and this impact would be considered significant and unavoidable. The City will make site -specific determinations of significance during the review of these individual development projects to determine which projects for which construction emissions may exceed significance thresholds. For the purpose of analysis in this EIR, a programmatic level of analysis is provided for the proposed development under the Overlay Zone. The Overlay Zone would develop 5,400 residential units, a total of 1.1 million square feet of commercial space, and 1.7 million square feet of office uses by the year 2030. As the Overlay Zone has the potential to exceed SCAQMD's recommended thresholds of significance and results in short-term air quality impacts, the impact of the Overlay Zone is anticipated to be significant. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.2-2 through MM-OZ 4.2-13 shall be implemented where appropriate. In addition, emission levels of VOCs, which are a precursor for ozone, would likely exceed SCAQMD significance thresholds during the application of architectural coatings (paint and primer) for the Overlay Zone. In order to reduce the VOC emissions levels associated with architectural coatings, Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.2-14 through MM-OZ 4.2-16. However, because construction emissions for an individual project typically exceed the SCAQMD's recommended thresholds of significance and results in short-term air quality impacts, the impact of the Overlay Zone, which takes into consideration the construction emissions generated from all of the development proposed under the Overlay Zone, were determined to be significant and unavoidable. Operation The Certified EIR stated that operational emissions generated by both stationary and mobile sources would result from normal day-to-day activities on the project site after occupation. Stationary, area source emissions would be generated by the consumption of natural gas for space and water heating devices, and the operation of landscape maintenance equipment. Mobile emissions would be generated by the motor vehicles traveling to and from the Overlay Zone. The analysis of daily operational emissions from the Overlay Zone has been prepared utilizing the URBEMIS 2002 computer model recommended by the SCAQMD. In terms of operational emissions, the Overlay Zone would incorporate certain features in its design that would help reduce the operational emissions that would otherwise be generated by the Overlay Zone. These design features include the following: • Street lighting to provide safety along pedestrian routes • Shade trees to shade sidewalks to encourage use by pedestrians The Overlay Zone's design features would encourage pedestrian activity, which would reduce the emissions from the operation of motor vehicles by project employees and residents. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 504 10/3/2023 Operation of the Overlay Zone would generate emissions that exceed the thresholds of significance recommended by the SCAQMD for VOC, NO, CO, and particulate matter 10 (PM,o). The exceedance of the SCAQMD thresholds for these four criteria pollutants is primarily due to the increase in motor vehicles traveling to and from the project site. As no feasible mitigation is available to reduce these emissions, this impact was determined to be significant and unavoidable. Expose Sensitive Receptors The Certified EIR stated that as was done to assess existing carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations, the simplified CALINE4 screening procedure was used to predict future CO concentrations. CO concentrations were calculated 20 intersections evaluated in the traffic report (included in its entirety as Appendix H to the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR) that is expected to operate at LOS E or F (unacceptable levels) at project buildout. Intersections operating at LOS E or F typically generate high CO concentrations that could exceed the federal or state 1-hour and 8-hour standards and are analyzed at project buildout to show the maximum effect of implementation of the Overlay Zone on ambient CO concentrations. Future CO concentrations near these intersections would not exceed the national 35.0 ppm and state 20.0 ppm 1-hour ambient air quality standards or the national or state 9.0 ppm 8-hour ambient air quality standards when the Overlay Zone is fully implemented in 2030. Therefore, sensitive receptors located in close proximity to these intersections would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations, and the potential impacts of the Overlay Zone were determined to be less than significant. No mitigation is required. It should be noted that projected CO concentrations shown in the Certified EIR are lower than the baseline CO concentrations due to anticipated improvements in vehicle emission rates projected for the future by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Odors The Certified EIR stated that construction activities do not usually emit offensive odors. Although construction activities occurring in association with the Overlay Zone could generate airborne odors associated with the operation of construction vehicles (i.e., diesel exhaust) and the application of interior and exterior architectural coatings, these emissions would only occur during daytime hours, would generally be restricted to the immediate vicinity of the construction site and activity, and would not affect a substantial number of people. Potential operational airborne odors could result from cooking activities associated with the new residential units and restaurants. These odors would be similar to existing residential and restaurant uses in the vicinity and would be confined to the immediate vicinity of the Overlay Zone. Restaurants are also typically required to have ventilation systems that avoid substantial adverse odor impacts. The other potential source of odors would be new trash receptacles within the Overlay Zone. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.2-1 would ensure the Overlay Zone would not create substantial objectionable odors, and this impact was determined to be less than significant. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 505 10/3/2023 Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.2-1 Trash receptacles within the Overlay Zone will be required to have lids that enable convenient collection and loading and will be emptied on a regular basis, in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations for the collection of solid waste. MM-OZ 4.2-2 The developer shall require by contract specifications that all diesel -powered equipment used would be retrofitted with after -treatment products (e.g., engine catalysts and other technologies available at the time construction commences) when construction activities commence. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-3 The developer shall require by contract specifications that all heavy-duty diesel -powered equipment operating and refueling at the project site would use low -NO), diesel fuel to the extent that it is readily available and cost effective (up to 125 percent of the cost of California Air Resources Board diesel) in the South Coast Air Basin at the time construction activities commence. This requirement shall not apply to diesel -powered trucks traveling to and from the project site. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-4 The developer shall require by contract specifications that alternative fuel construction equipment (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) would be utilized to the extent feasible in the South Coast Air Basin at the time construction activities commence. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-5 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction equipment engines will be maintained in good condition and in proper tune per manufacturer's specification for the duration of construction. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-6 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction -related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes. Diesel -fueled commercial motor vehicles with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 506 10/3/2023 construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-7 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure surrounding the construction site rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-8 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction parking be configured to minimize traffic interference during the construction period and, therefore, reduce idling of traffic. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-9 The developer shall require by contract specifications that temporary traffic controls are provided, such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-10 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system be scheduled to off-peak hours (10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.). Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-11 The developer shall require by contract specifications that dedicated on -site and off -site left -turn lanes on truck hauling routes be utilized for movement of construction trucks and equipment on site and off site to the extent feasible during construction activities. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-12 Upon issuance of building or grading permits, whichever is issued earliest; notification shall be mailed to owners and occupants of all developed land uses within'/4 mile of the Overlay Zone and the individual projects within the Overlay Zone providing a schedule for major construction activities that will occur through the duration of the construction period. In addition, the notification will include the identification and contact number for a community liaison and designated construction manager that would be available on site to monitor construction activities. The construction manager shall be responsible for complying with all project requirements related to PM10 generation. The construction manager will be located at the on -site construction office during Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 507 10/3/2023 construction hours for the duration of all construction activities. Contract information for the community liaison and construction manager will be located at the construction office, City Hall, the police department, and a sign on site. MM-OZ 4.2-13 As required by South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403— Fugitive Dust, all construction activities that are capable of generating fugitive dust are required to implement dust control measures during each phase of project development to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air. These measures include the following: • Limiting the amount of area disturbed during site grading to 10 acres per day • Application of soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas • Quick replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas • Watering of all unpaved haul roads three times daily • Covering all stockpiles with tarp • Reduction of vehicle speed on unpaved roads • Post signs on site, limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less • Sweep streets adjacent to the project site at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads • Cover or have water applied to the exposed surface of all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas • Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads to wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each tri p MM-OZ 4.2-14 The developer shall require by contract specifications that the architectural coating (paint and primer) products used would have a VOC rating of 125 grams per liter or less. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-15 The developer shall require by contract specifications that materials that do not require painting be used during construction to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. MM-OZ 4.2-16 The developer shall require by contract specifications that pre -painted construction materials be used to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency staff. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 508 10/3/2023 4.3.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. As demonstrated below, the Project would incorporate the applicable mitigation measures identified in the Certified EIR and would not result in any new or increased significant air quality impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. The analysis of the Project's air quality impacts presented below is based on the technical Air Quality Report included as Attachment A. AQMP Consistency Since preparation of the Certified EIR in 2006, the AQMP has been updated. Below is a discussion of the Project's consistency with the 2022 AQMP. As discussed below, the Project's air quality emissions would not exceed any state or federal standards. Therefore, the Project would not increase the frequency or severity of an existing violation or cause or contribute to new violations for these pollutants. As the Project would not exceed any of the state and federal standards, the Project would also not delay timely attainment of air quality standards or interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. With respect to the determination of consistency with AQMP growth assumptions, the projections in the AQMP for achieving air quality goals are based on assumptions in SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS regarding population, housing, and growth trends. Determining whether or not a project exceeds the assumptions reflected in the AQMP involves the evaluation of three criteria: (1) consistency with applicable population, housing, and employment growth projections; (2) project Mitigation Measures; and (3) appropriate incorporation of AQMP land use planning strategies. The following discussion provides an analysis with respect to each of these three criteria. • Is the project consistent with the population, housing, and employment growth projections upon which AQMP forecasted emission levels are based? A project is consistent with the AQMP, in part, if it is consistent with the population, housing, and employment assumptions that were used in the development of the AQMP, which are based on SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS provides socioeconomic forecast projections of regional population Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 509 10/3/2023 growth. The population, housing, and employment forecasts, which are adopted by SCAG's Regional Council, are based on local plans and policies applicable to the specific area; these are used by SCAG in all phases of implementation and review. The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS accommodates 360,100 persons; 80,100 households; and 172,400 jobs in the City by 2045. Based on SCAG's average 2020 persons -per -household rate for the City of 4.6 persons per household, the Project would add a net residential population of approximately 2,334 people to the Project Site based on the 507 dwelling units proposed.' The Project's residential population would represent approximately 11.7 percent of the forecast population growth between 2020 and 2045. Development of the Project also would result in the removal of about 542 on -site jobs based on the 173,025 square feet of general office uses.2 Thus, the Project's estimated employment impact would not help produce job growth that exceeds the capacity that is accommodated in the 2022 AQMP. As a result, the Project would be consistent with the projections in the AQMP. • Does the project implement feasible air quality mitigation measures? As discussed below, the Project would not result in any significant air quality impacts and thus, would not require mitigation. In addition, the Project would incorporate the applicable mitigation measures contained in the Certified EIR and would comply with all applicable regulatory standards as required by SCAQMD. Furthermore, with compliance with the regulatory requirements identified above, no significant air quality impacts would occur. As such, the proposed Project meets this AQMP consistency criterion. • To what extent is project development consistent with the land use policies set forth in the AQMP? With regard to land use developments such as the Project, the AQMP's air quality policies focus on the reduction of vehicle trips and VMT. The Project would implement all applicable land use policies and measures within the AQMP. Further, the Project would be designed and constructed to support and promote environmental sustainability. The Project represents an infill development within an existing urbanized area that would concentrate more housing and population within a high quality transit area (HQTA). "Green" principles are incorporated throughout the Project to comply with the Green Building Code and the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) through energy conservation, water conservation, and waste reduction features. The air quality plan applicable to the Project area is the 2022 AQMP, the current management plan for progression toward compliance with State and federal clean air requirements. The Project ' Southern California Association of Governments; Final Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction; https.11scag. ca.gov/sites/main/fileslfile- attachments10903fconnectsocal demographics-and-growth-forecast.pdf?1606001579. 2 Prepared by The Natelson Company, Inc. for the Southern California Association of Governments, Employment Density Study Summary Report; October 2001. Assumes 319 square feet average per general office (low-rise) employee. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 510 10/3/2023 would be required to comply with all regulatory measures set forth by the SCAQMD. Implementation of the Project would not interfere with air pollution control measures listed in the 2022 AQMP. In addition, as demonstrated in the following analyses, the Project would not result in significant emissions that would jeopardize regional or localized air quality standards. The Project Site is classified as "District Center" (Medium High DC-3) in the General Plan, a classification that allows mixed -use residential, retail, and commercial development at a 3:1 Floor Area Ratio such as that proposed by the Project.3 As such, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS' assumptions about growth in the City accommodate population, housing, and job growth on the Project Site. As a result, the Project would be consistent with the growth assumptions in the City's General Plan. Because the AQMP accommodates growth forecasts from local General Plans, the emissions associated with this Project are accounted for and mitigated in the region's air quality attainment plans. The air quality impacts of development on the Project Site are accommodated in the region's emissions inventory for the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS and 2022 AQMP. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the 2022 AQMP, and no new or increased significant impacts would occur beyond the AQMP consistency impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in Criteria Pollutant The Project would contribute to local and regional air pollutant emissions during its construction (short-term) and operations (long-term). However, as discussed in the following analysis, construction and operations of the Project would not result in exceedances of SCAQMD daily thresholds for project -specific impacts that could subsequently cause cumulatively considerable increases in emissions of pollutants for which the Basin is designated as non -attainment. Construction Emissions Construction of the Project is anticipated to take approximately 36 months. During this time, a variety of heavy-duty diesel -powered vehicles and equipment would be operated on -site. Demolition of the existing site improvements would likely require an excavator, as well as a loader, bulldozer, or another similar grading vehicle. Grading for the Project would require similar vehicles. During the demolition and excavation phases, haul trucks would be utilized to transport demolished materials and cut soils to a nearby landfill. The building construction phase could require vehicles such as a forklift and a crane or truck -mounted crane. Table 9 summarizes the potential construction schedule that was used to model the Project's air quality impacts. As shown in Table 10, the Project's regional and localized construction -related pollutant emissions would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable significance thresholds. Additionally, the Project would be required to implement applicable mitigation measures from the Certified EIR that would further reduce the Project's emission, which would not exceed SCAQMD's thresholds. 4 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, 2002. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 511 10/3/2023 Therefore, no new or increased significant impacts would occur beyond the construction emissions impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Table 10 Reqional and Localized Proiect Construction Emissions Emissions in Ibs per day VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 2024 3.8 38.6 34.9 0.1 10.0 5.6 2025 3.3 29.8 44.1 0.1 8.3 2.6 2026 2.9 15.5 42.3 0.1 8.2 2.2 2027 63.2 15.7 46.7 0.1 9.6 2.5 Maximum Regional Total 63.2 38.6 46.7 0.1 10.0 5.6 Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Maximum Localized Total 57.5 33.0 21.7 0.1 4.1 1.8 Localized Threshold N/A 183 1,253 N/A 13 7 Exceed Threshold? N/A No No N/A No No The construction dates are used for the modeling of air quality emissions in the CalEEMod software. If construction activities commence later than what is assumed in the environmental analysis, the actual emissions would be lower than analyzed because of the increasing penetration of newer equipment with lower certified emission levels. Assumes implementation of SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust Emissions). Source: DKA Planning, 2023 based on CaIEEMod 2022.1.1.14 model runs. LST analyses based on five - acre site with 25-meter distances to receptors in Central Orange County source receptor area. Estimates reflect the peak summer or winter season, whichever is higher. Totals may not add up due to rounding. Modeling sheets included in Attachment A. Operational Emissions As shown in Table 11, the Project's regional and localized operational -related pollutant emissions would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable significance thresholds. Therefore, no new or increased significant impacts would occur beyond the operational emissions impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 - 512 10/3/2023 Table 11 Reaional and Localized Operational Emissions Emissions Source Emissions in Ibs per day VOC NO. CO SO,, PM,o P11112.5 Area Sources 28.6 0.6 45.2 <0.1 0.1 0.1 Energy Sources 0.1 1.7 0.8 <0.1 0.1 0.1 Mobile Sources 8.5 6.3 74.9 0.2 19.6 5.1 Less Existing Emissions (12.3) (7.0) (71.4) (0.2) (13.5) (3.6) Net Regional Total 24.9 1.6 49.6 <0.1 6.3 1.6 Regional Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Net Localized Total 28.7 2.3 46.0 <0.1 0.2 0.2 Localized Significance Threshold N/A 183 1,253 N/A 3 2 Exceed Threshold? N/A No No N/A No No LST analyses based on five -acre site with 25-meter distances to receptors in Central Orange County SRA. Source: DKA Planning, 2023, based on CalEEMod 2022.1.1.14 model runs (refer to Attachment A). Totals reflect the summer season maximum and may not add up due to rounding. Expose Sensitive Receptors Sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the Project Site include the following: • Cabrillo Park, 1820 East Fruit Street; directly north of the Project Site. • Residences, 724 North Parkcenter Drive; 80 feet northeast of the Project Site • Residences, 618 Sherry Lane; 400 feet west of the Project Site. • Residences, 1901 East First Street; 450 feet south of the Project Site. Construction Emissions Construction of the Project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations if maximum daily emissions of regulated pollutants generated by sources located on and/or near the Project Site exceeded the applicable localized significance threshold (LST) values, or if construction activities generated significant emissions of TACs that could result in carcinogenic risks or non - carcinogenic hazards exceeding the SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds of 10 excess cancers per million or non -carcinogenic Hazard Index greater than 1.0, respectively. As discussed above, the LST values were derived by the SCAQMD for the criteria pollutants NOx, CO, PM,o, and PM2.5 to prevent the occurrence of concentrations exceeding the air quality standards at sensitive receptor locations based on proximity and construction site size. As shown in Table 10, during construction of the Project, maximum daily localized unmitigated emissions of NO2, CO, PM,o, and PM2.5 from sources on the Project Site would remain far below each of the respective LST values. Daily localized emissions would not exceed any of the Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 - 513 10/3/2023 localized standards for receptors that are within 25 meters of the Project's construction activities. Additionally, the Project would be required to implement applicable mitigation measures from the Certified EIR that would further reduce the Project's emission, which would not exceed SCAQMD's thresholds. Therefore, based on SCAQMD guidance, localized emissions of criteria pollutants would not have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations that would present a public health concern. The primary toxic air contaminant TAC that would be generated by construction activities is diesel particulate matter (PM), which would be released from the exhaust stacks of construction equipment. The construction emissions modeling conservatively assumed that all equipment present on the Project Site would be operating simultaneously throughout most of the day, while in all likelihood this would rarely be the case. Average daily emissions of diesel PM would be less than one pound per day throughout the course of Project construction. Therefore, the magnitude of daily diesel PM emissions, would not be sufficient to result in substantial pollutant concentrations at off -site locations nearby. Furthermore, according to SCAQMD methodology, health risks from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of individual cancer risk. "Individual Cancer Risk" is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 30-year period will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk -assessment methodology. The entire duration of construction activities associated with implementation of the Project is anticipated to be approximately 36 months, and the magnitude of daily diesel PM emissions will vary over this time period. No residual emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk are anticipated after construction. Because there is such a short- term exposure period, construction TAC emissions would result in a less than significant impact. Thus, construction of the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial diesel PM concentrations. Therefore, no new or increased significant impacts would occur beyond the air quality impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Operational Emissions The Project Site would be redeveloped with multi -family residences, retail, and office uses, land uses that are not typically associated with TAC emissions. Typical sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs include industrial manufacturing processes (e.g., chrome plating, electrical manufacturing, petroleum refinery). The Project would not include these types of potential industrial manufacturing process sources. It is expected that quantities of hazardous TACs generated on -site (e.g., cleaning solvents, paints, landscape pesticides) for the types of proposed land uses would be below thresholds warranting further study under California Accidental Release Program. When considering potential air quality impacts under CEQA, consideration is given to the location of sensitive receptors within close proximity of land uses that emit TACs. CARB has published and adopted the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, which provides recommendations regarding the siting of new sensitive land uses near potential sources of air toxic emissions (e.g., freeways, distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities). The SCAQMD adopted similar recommendations in its Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 514 10/3/2023 and Local Planning. Together, the CARB and SCAQMD guidelines recommend siting distances for both the development of sensitive land uses in proximity to TAC sources and the addition of new TAC sources in proximity to existing sensitive land uses. The primary sources of potential air toxics associated with Project operations include diesel PM from delivery trucks (e.g., truck traffic on local streets and idling on adjacent streets) and to a lesser extent, facility operations (e.g., natural gas -fired boilers). However, these activities and the land uses associated with the Project, are not considered land uses that generate substantial TAC emissions. It should be noted that the SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments (HRAs) be conducted for substantial individual sources of diesel PM (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities that generate more than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.4 Based on this guidance, the Project would not include these types of land uses and is not considered to be a substantial source of DPM warranting a refined HRA since daily truck trips to the Project Site would not exceed 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units. Further, Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-1 of the Certified EIR requires that an HRA for diesel exhaust be prepared for future residential uses that are developed within the Overlay Zone and within 500 feet of an existing freeway. However, the Project Site is more than 500 feet from the nearest freeway, and as such, Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-1 does not apply to the Project. In addition, the CARB-mandated airborne toxic control measures (ATCM) limit diesel -fueled commercial vehicles (delivery trucks) to idle for no more than five minutes at any given time, which would further limit diesel particulate emissions. As the Project would not contain substantial TAC sources and is consistent with the CARB and SCAQMD guidelines, the Project would not result in the exposure of off -site sensitive receptors to carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants that exceed the maximum incremental cancer risk of 10 in one million or an acute or chronic hazard index of 1.0, and potential TAC impacts would be less than significant. While long-term operations of the Project would add traffic to local roads that produces off -site emissions, these would not result in exceedances of CO air quality standards at roadways in the area due to three key factors. First, CO hotspots are extremely rare and only occur in the presence of unusual atmospheric conditions and extremely cold conditions, neither of which applies to this Project Site area. Second, auto -related emissions of CO continue to decline because of advances in fuel combustion technology in the vehicle fleet. Finally, the Project would not contribute to the levels of congestion that would be needed to produce emissions concentrations needed to trigger a CO hotspot, as it would add 875 vehicle trips to the local roadway network on weekdays when the development could be leased and operational in 2027.5 However, peak hour vehicle travel would generally reduce from existing conditions, as traffic to and from Project Site would reduce by 50 trips and zero trips during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, respectively.6 This would represent 4 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, 2002. Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. 6 Ibid. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 515 10/3/2023 a reduction in peak hour traffic, which would benefit arterials like Fourth Street between Tustin Avenue and Cabrillo Park Drive, which carry 23,828 vehicles during a weekday.' This would help reduce any potential that traffic volumes would generate CO exceedances of the ambient air quality standard.$ Finally, the Project would not result in any substantial emissions of TACs during the construction or operations phase. During the construction phase, the primary air quality impacts would be associated with the combustion of diesel fuels, which produce exhaust -related particulate matter that is considered a toxic air contaminant by CARB based on chronic exposure to these emissions.9 However, construction activities would not produce chronic, long-term exposure to diesel particulate matter. During long-term project operations, the Project does not include typical sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs such as industrial manufacturing processes and automotive repair facilities. As a result, the Project would not create substantial concentrations of TACs. In addition, the SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments be conducted for substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.10 The Project would not generate a substantial number of truck trips. Based on the limited activity of TAC sources, the Project would not warrant the need for a health risk assessment associated with on -site activities. Thus, the Project's operational activities would not expose sensitive receptors to excessive emissions. Therefore, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant air quality impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Odors The Project would not result in activities that create objectionable odors. The Project is a mixed - use development that would not include any activities typically associated with unpleasant odors and local nuisances (e.g., rendering facilities, dry cleaners). SCAQMD regulations that govern nuisances (i.e., Rule 402, Nuisances) would regulate any occasional odors associated with residences. Additionally, the Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.2-1 from the City of Santa. Ana GIS Open Data portal, accessed July 26, 2023. 2015 traffic counts adjusted by a one percent adjustment to reflect ambient traffic growth. https://gis-santa- ana. opendata. arcgis. com/datasets/927f0b948fcf400eaf1 c 13d35239a 7b 1/explore ?location =33.74925 6 %2 C-117. 838 786 %2 C 17. 62 South Coast Air Quality Management District; 2003 AQMP. As discussed in the 2003 AQMP, the 1992 CO Plan included a CO hotspot analysis at four intersections in the peak A.M. and P.M. time periods, including Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway (Lynwood), Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue (Westwood), Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue (Hollywood), and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard (Inglewood). The busiest intersection was Wilshire and Veteran, used by 100,000 vehicles per day. The 2003 AQMP estimated a 4.6 ppm one -hour concentration at this intersection, which meant that an exceedance (20 ppm) would not occur until daily traffic exceeded more than 400, 000 vehicles per day. 9 California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Health Effects of Diesel Exhaust. www. http✓/oehha.ca.gov/public info/facts/dieselfacts.html 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 516 10/3/2023 Certified EIR, which requires compliance with the City's solid waste regulations. The Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Therefore, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant odor impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Conclusion As demonstrated above, the Project's air quality impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, the Project would be required to implement mitigation measures from the Certified EIR that would further reduce the Project's emission, which would not exceed SCAQMD's thresholds. Therefore, the Project would not result in new or increased significant impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. 4.3.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to air quality have occurred and no substantial pollutant emissions or concentrations have been identified within the vicinity of the Project Site since certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.3.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to air quality that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.3.5 EIR's Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.2-1 through MM-OZ 4.2-16 from the Certified EIR. 4.3.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified impacts on air quality would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to air quality do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 517 10/3/2023 4.4 Biological Resources Any Substantially Changed Any Substantial Circumstances Changes Involving Involving New New Significant Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Impacts or or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination Substantially More More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Severe Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: (a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or Less Than special status species Significant With No No No Yes in local or regional Mitigation plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, No Impact No No No No policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally -protected wetlands, (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, No Impact No No No No coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native No Impact No No No No resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological No Impact No No No No resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (f) Conflict with the provisions of an No Impact No No No No adopted Habitat Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 518 10/3/2023 Any Substantially Changed Any Substantial Circumstances Changes Involving Involving New New Significant Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Impacts or or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination Substantially More More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Severe Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? Conservation Man, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 4.4.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Substantial Adverse Effect on Special Status Species The Certified EIR stated that no endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species designated by the USFWS, CDFG, or CNPS are known to occur or were found within the Overlay Zone area. Therefore, there are no impacts to special - status species associated with implementation of the Overlay Zone, either directly or indirectly. However, migratory avian species that may use portions of the Overlay Zone for nesting during the breeding season are protected under the MBTA. Construction- related activities, that may include, but are not necessarily limited to, building demolition and/or relocation, grading, materials laydown, access and infrastructure improvements, and building construction, could result in the disturbance of nesting migratory species covered under the MBTA. The most identifiable potential direct impact to migratory species would involve the removal of vegetation (esp. trees) within the Overlay Zone. Although no identifiable habitats exist within the Overlay Zone, this does not preclude the presence of migratory species nesting among the existing landscape vegetation. At this time, the precise number of trees that would be removed or the number of trees that could be indirectly impacted by construction activities, are not known. However, as mentioned above, the MBTA provides for the protection of migratory birds, including the non -permitted take of migratory birds. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.3-1 would reduce this potentially significant impact to a less than significant level by ensuring that surveys for MBTA species are performed during the appropriate time of year and, if necessary, construction buffer zones are established to protect nesting MBTA species. Substantial Adverse Effect on Riparian Habitat or Sensitive Community The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone and surrounding areas are completely developed and/or disturbed. No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are located in these areas. Therefore, no impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities would occur. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 519 10/3/2023 Substantial Adverse Effect on Wetlands The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is not in proximity to, nor does it contain, wetland habitat or a blueline stream. Therefore, development within the Overlay Zone would have no impact on federally protected wetlands, as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Substantially Interfere with Migratory Movement The Certified EIR stated that development within the Overlay Zone would not substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. The Overlay Zone and surrounding areas are completely developed and/or disturbed. The Overlay Zone is surrounded by urban uses on all four sides, including two highways, and, therefore, does not function as a wildlife movement corridor. There is no impact. Conflict with Tree Preservation Ordinance The Certified EIR stated that the City recognizes that it is located in an urban setting and has tailored the goals of its conservation element accordingly. To obtain its goals, the City has established objectives that focus on the preservation of open space and cultural resources and protecting the public's health and welfare. The Overlay Zone does not contain cultural resources, nor is it zoned open space, and as such, the Overlay Zone does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The City's conservation element encourages establishment of mixed -use districts, and the overall visual enhancement of the City, both of which will occur within the Overlay Zone. There is no impact. Conflict with Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan The Orange County Natural Community Conservation Plan and Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/NCP) can be met through observing previously established laws and regulations (i.e., the Federal Endangered Species Act and the California Endangered Species Act). If a take is unavoidable, then the payment of mitigation fees will be made to the proper non-profit organization. There is no impact. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.3-1 To ensure that avian species of concern, protected migratory species (e.g., MBTA), or raptors species are not injured or disturbed by construction in the vicinity of nesting habitat, the project applicant shall implement the following measures: 1. When feasible, all tree removal shall occur between August 30 and February 15 to avoid the breeding season of any raptor species that could be using the area, and to discourage hawks from nesting in the vicinity of an upcoming construction area. This period may be modified Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 520 10/3/2023 with the authorization of the DFG; or if it is not feasible to remove trees outside this window then, prior to the beginning of mass grading, including grading for major infrastructure improvements, during the period between February 15 and August 30, all trees within 350 feet of any grading or earthmoving activity shall be surveyed for active raptor nests by a qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to disturbance. If active raptor nests are found, and the site is within 350 feet of potential construction activity, a fence shall be erected around the tree(s) at a distance of up to 350 feet, depending on the species, from the edge of the canopy to prevent construction disturbance and intrusions on the nest area. The appropriate buffer shall be determined by the City in consultation with CDFG. 2. No construction vehicles shall be permitted within restricted areas (i.e., raptor protection zones), unless directly related to the management or protection of the legally protected species. 3. In the event that a nest is abandoned, despite efforts to minimize disturbance, and if the nestlings are still alive, the developer shall contact CDFG and subject to CDFG approval, fund the recovery and hacking (controlled release of captive reared young) of the nestling(s). 4. If a legally protected species nest is located in a tree designated for removal, the removal shall be deferred until after August 30th, or until the adults and young of the year are no longer dependent on the nest site as determined by a qualified biologist. 4.4.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. The Project would not remove any trees identified on the City's list of Designated Tree Species." The Project would incorporate MM-OZ 4.3-1 identified in the Certified EIR to minimize impacts related to migratory/nesting species, and accordingly, would not result in any new or increased significant biological impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. >> City of Santa Ana Designated Tree Species Materis, https://storage.googleapis. com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/03/Designated-Tree-Species- Guide.pdf. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 521 10/3/2023 Mitigation Measures The Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.3-1 from the Certified EIR. 4.4.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to biological resources have occurred and no substantial new biological resources have been identified within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.4.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to biological resources that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.4.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impact The project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.3-1 from the Certified EIR. 4.4.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant impacts to biological resources or a substantial increase Project. Therefore, the adoption of the Project does not meet the conditions for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 522 10/3/2023 3.5 Cultural Resources Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Substantially or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: (a) Cause a substantial adverse Less Than change in the significance of a Significant With No No No Yes historical resource pursuant to Mitigation CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? (b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of Less Than an archaeological resource Significant With No No No Yes pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Mitigation §15064.5? (c) Disturb any human remains, Less Than including those interred Significant With No No No Yes outside of formal cemeteries? Mitigation 4.5.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Historic Resources The Certified EIR stated that there are no documented significant historical resources (i.e., buildings, structures, landmarks, or historic districts) within the Overlay Zone, although five historically significant structures occur within '/2-mile of the Overlay Zone boundaries. Therefore, impacts to existing formally- documented historic resources would be less than significant, as no direct impacts would occur to any historic structures. Potential indirect impacts could occur to those structures located outside of the Overlay Zone in the form of shade/shadow impacts. Refer to Section 4.1 for a description of shade/shadow impacts. However, it is expected that multiple structures within the Overlay Zone are currently 50+ years of age or will be 50+ years of age in the future when actual redevelopment projects may be proposed. As such, redevelopment of sites within the Overlay Zone could result in the demolition or major modification of historically -aged structures which have not yet been evaluated to determine their cultural and/or architectural significance. Because of the site -specific nature of the historically -aged structures in relation to potential (not yet defined) future redevelopment, it is difficult to determine if actual adverse impacts will occur. Such impacts can only be determined once project sites have been chosen, development projects are designed, and affected 50+ year - old structures in the vicinity of the Overlay Zone footprints are formally evaluated to determine their cultural significance. If it is determined in the future that any existing historically -aged (50+ years old) structures in the Overlay Zone have cultural significance, and proposed future development would ultimately affect Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 523 10/3/2023 those structures, then potentially significant impacts would occur. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.4-1 will ensure that no significant impacts on historical resources would occur. Archaeological Resources The Certified EIR stated that no known archaeological resources exist within the Overlay Zone, but archaeological resources have been documented within and near the City of Santa Ana. In addition, the Overlay Zone has already been subject to extensive disruption from previous development and may contain artificial fill materials. As such, any archaeological resources which may have existed within the Overlay Zone have likely been disturbed. While not expected, the remote potential exists that construction activities associated with ground disturbance within the Overlay Zone may unearth undocumented archaeological resources. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.4-2 and MM-OZ 4.4-3 will ensure that no significant on archaeological resources would occur. Human Remains The Certified EIR stated that no formal cemeteries are known to have occupied any portion of the Overlay Zone, so any human remains encountered would likely come from archaeological or historical archaeological contexts. Human burials, in addition to being potential archaeological resources, have specific provisions for treatment in Section 5097 of the California Public Resources Code (PRC) and Sections 7050.5, 7051, and 7054 of the California Health and Safety Code (HSC). Because no know archaeological sites are present in the Overlay Zone area and the area is underlain by disturbed soils, the presence of human remains is remote. However, if remains are encountered, disturbing these remains could violate PRC and HSC provisions, as well as destroy the resource. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.4-5 will ensure that this impact will be less than significant by ensuring appropriate examination, treatment, and protection of human remains, if any are discovered. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.4-1 The City of Santa Ana shall require as part of the environmental review of development projects within the Overlay Zone that impacts to potentially significant historic resources be considered. If any existing structures on a proposed development site are at or approaching 50+ years of age at the time of CEQA review, the City shall retain the services of a qualified architectural historian to conduct a field survey of the structure in question and technical study to determine its potential historical significance and develop mitigation measures as necessary. MM-OZ 4.4-2 Due to the lack of cultural resource studies for the project site and in order to avoid damaging any unidentified cultural resources, a qualified archaeologist should be retained to monitor any significant ground -disturbing activities in undeveloped areas within the Overlay Zone, and any deep (10' or deeper) ground -disturbing activities in all areas of the Overlay Zone. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 524 10/3/2023 MM-OZ 4.4-3 In the event that archeological resources are unearthed during project subsurface activities, all earth -disturbing work within a 100-meter radius must be temporarily suspended or redirected until an archeologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. MM-OZ 4.4-5 If human remains are unearthed, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 require that no further disturbance shall occur until the County coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC will then contact the most likely descendant of the deceased Native American, who will then serve as consultant on how to proceed with the remains. 4.5.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. As discussed below, the Project will incorporate mitigation measures to minimize impacts related to cultural resources would be less than significant, and accordingly, would not result in any new or increased significant impacts to cultural resources beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Historic Resources The Certified EIR concluded that redevelopment of sites within the Overlay Zone could result in the demolition or major modification of historically -aged structures which have not yet been evaluated to determine their significance as defined by Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, and this was considered a significant impact. The Project Site contains four structures construction between 1971 and 1978, only one of which is over 50 years (the office building located at 1971 East 4th Street). In compliance with MM-OZ 4.4-1, a Historic Resources Assessment was prepared for the Project by LSA, dated July 2022 (refer to Attachment B). The assessment included archival research, outreach to local historical groups, a field survey, and a written analysis. The purpose of the assessment is to provide the City with the necessary information and analysis to determine, as mandated by CEQA, whether the Project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical resources that may exist in or around the Project Site area. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, LSA conducted historical background research and carried out an intensive -level field survey. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 525 10/3/2023 As a result of the research and field survey, the commercial building at 1971 East 4th Street does not appear to be historically significant under either the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) or City of Santa Ana criteria. The building is therefore not a significant historical resource as defined by CEQA. The building is part of an approximately 8-acre development, Town Center Plaza, that includes four buildings with a cohesive design aesthetic. However, the development as a whole is less than 50 years old, with the exception of the building at 1971 East 4th Street, and none of the buildings are exceptional examples of a particular style. Thus, the Project would not directly or indirectly impact a historic resource and would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to historic resources beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Archaeological Resources The Certified EIR concluded that implementation of the Overlay Zone has the potential to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site, or unique geologic feature and this would be considered a significant impact, and compliance with the identified mitigation measure would reduce this impact to less than significant. The Project would include excavation beyond 10 feet below ground surface and would be required to implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.4-2 and MM-OZ 4.4-3, requiring construction monitoring by a qualified archeologist and certain actions in the event that a potential resource is encountered during Project construction. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to archaeological resources beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Human Remains The Certified EIR concluded that construction activities under the Overlay Zone could result in the disturbance of human remains interred outside of formal cemeteries. The Project would include excavation and would be required to implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.4-4, which prescribes certain actions in the event human remains are encountered during Project construction. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to human remains beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Mitigation Measures The Project would implement Mitigation MM-OZ 4.4-1 through MM-OZ 4.4-4 from the Certified EIR. 4.5.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to cultural resources have occurred and no substantial new cultural resources have been identified within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 526 10/3/2023 4.5.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to cultural resources that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.5.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impact The Project would implement Mitigation MM-OZ 4.4-2 through MM-OZ 4.4-4 from the Certified EIR. 4.5.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant impacts to cultural resources or a substantial increase in previously identified cultural resource impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the adoption of the Project does not meet the conditions for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 527 10/3/2023 4.6 Energy Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Substantially or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? ENERGY: Would the project: (a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or Less Than unnecessary Significant No No No Yes consumption of energy With Mitigation resources, during project construction or operation? (b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for Less Than No No No No renewable energy or Significant energy efficiency? 4.6.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Wasteful, Inefficient, or Unnecessary Consumption of Energy/Conflict with or Obstruct Plan for Renewable Energy or Energy Efficiency The Certified EIR stated that on peak days, the increase in demand from implementation of future development under the Overlay Zone would contribute to electricity supply and delivery constraints. However, all future development would be constructed in compliance with Title 24 energy efficiency standards. By the time future development would be constructed under the Overlay Zone, it is expected that some steps outlined in the California Energy Commission (CEC) action plan will have been implemented to alleviate energy constraints. If these constraints do remain, they could be addressed through "rolling blackouts," which are limited to specific geographic areas for a period of hours. Further, if energy constraints remain, they are a reflection of the broad energy supply issues experienced by California as a whole, and not unique to the demands of the development in the City. Further, the CEC licensed two additional power plants in 2001 that were anticipated to provide California with electrical energy supply capacity and the ability to meet peak load demand in excess of forecasts of regional energy supplies. Consequently, although the Overlay Zone would result in an increased electricity demand in the City, additional energy demands resulting from the Overlay Zone would be adequately met by current and planned infrastructure during most of the year. Further, development under the Overlay Zone would be required to comply with the Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 528 10/3/2023 energy conservation measures contained in Title 24, which would reduce the amount of energy needed for the operation of any buildings constructed as a part of the Overlay Zone. Additionally, the current electrical demand of the Overlay Zone is within the capacity limitations of the electrical facilities serving the City. Excluding any unforeseen problems, existing distribution resources have the ability to serve all existing customer loads in accordance with its rules and tariffs. The projected electrical demand of the Overlay Zone area and for build -out under the Overlay Zone is expected to be within Southern California Edison's (SCE) current 10-year load forecasts. Though SCE's total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually, excluding any unforeseen problems, SCE's plans for new distribution resources would be adequate to serve all existing and new customer loads throughout the next decade. SCE does not expect that utilities deregulation will affect service to the Overlay Zone area. However, to reduce any potential impacts associated with build out of the Overlay Zone, SCE recommends the use of energy -efficient and high-performance design for nonresidential and residential building design and construction. The Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) declares itself a "reactive" utility and will provide natural gas as customers request its services. SCGC has also indicated that an adequate supply of natural gas is currently available to serve additional development, and that the natural gas level of service provided to the City would not be impaired by buildout under the Overlay Zone. Any expansion of service necessitated by implementation of the Overlay Zone would be in accordance with SCGC's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual agreements are made. Although the Overlay Zone would result in the energy demand increases in demand noted above, an adequate energy supply is anticipated to be available, as the electrical and gas supplies and infrastructure to support demand are provided as needed by SCE and SCGC. Therefore, the Overlay Zone would not substantially increase demands beyond the available supply. In case of electricity, the cost associated with relocating the facilities, if required shall be borne by the developer. The developer will also be required to make contractual arrangements with SCGC prior to initiation of construction for the gas. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall coordinate with SCE/SCGC to determine the exact location of all underground and overhead electrical/gas facilities. All electrical/gas facilities and associated structures left on the site shall be protected from damage. Grading plans should reflect the undergrounding of utility lines serving the Overlay Zone. The project -generated demand for electricity and natural gas would be negligible in the context of overall demand within the City of Santa Ana and the state and thus is not anticipated to require substantial upgrades or expansion of existing energy systems. Though the project would not increase the energy demand significantly, mitigation measures are suggested to promote conservation of energy to further reduce the impact. It was determined that implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.13-2 will foster efficient energy use and ensure that energy impacts will be less than significant. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 529 10/3/2023 Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.13-2 The project shall implement energy conservation measures (such as energy - efficient lighting and micro -processor -controlled HVAC equipment) to reduce the demand for electricity and natural gas. The energy conservation measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed or if current technology becomes obsolete through replacement. 4.6.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? Wasteful, Inefficient, or Unnecessary Consumption of Energy/Conflict with or Obstruct Plan for Renewable Energy or Energy Efficiency The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. Therefore, the Project's energy consumption has been accounted for in the Certified EIR. The Certified EIR concluded that implementation of the Overlay Zone could increase the demand for electricity and gas. However, the Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.13- 2 from the Certified EIR, requiring energy conservation measures. Further, the Project will comply with CalGreen and Title 24 energy efficiency standards and requirements and other state and local regulations that reduce the Project's energy use. The current 2022 CalGreen requirements impose greater sustainability requirements and green features, including solar and electric vehicle mandates than were in place at the time the City adopted the Certified EIR in 2006.Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to energy beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Mitigation Measures The Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.13-2 from the Certified EIR. 4.6.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to energy use and resources have occurred since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 530 10/3/2023 4.6.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to energy that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.6.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impact The Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.13-2 from the Certified EIR. 4.6.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant impacts to energy or a substantial increase in previously identified energy impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the adoption of the Project does not meet the conditions for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 531 10/3/2023 4.7 Geology and Soils Any Substantially Any Substantial Changed Changes Circumstances Involving New Involving New Significant Significant Impacts or Impacts or Any New Project Impact Substantially Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Information Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: (a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk or loss, injury or death involving: (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning No Impact Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Less Than (ii)Strong seismic ground Significant With shaking? Mitigation Less Than (iii) Seismic -related ground Significant with failure, including liquefaction? Mitigation (iv) Landslides? No Impact (b) Result in substantial soil Less Than erosion or the loss of Significant g topsoil? (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Less Than project, and potentially Significant result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- Less Than 1-B of the Uniform Building Significant with Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect Mitigation risks to life or property? (e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater No Impact disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Less Than (f) Directly or indirectly destroy Significant With a unique paleontological Mitigation No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 532 10/3/2023 Any Substantially Any Substantial Changed Changes Circumstances Involving New Involving New Significant Significant Impacts or Impacts or Any New Project Impact Substantially Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Information Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? resource or site or unique geologic feature? 4.7.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone The Certified EIR stated that there are no active faults, or currently mapped Earthquake Fault Zone State Special Study Zones (formerly known as Alquist-Priolo Zones) within the Overlay Zone that would cause a fault rupture. The Overlay Zone is also not located within any currently mapped Seismic Hazard Zone, where a site -specific investigation to determine the location of any faults would be required. The Overlay Zone would have no impact associated with exposing people or structures to rupture of a known earthquake fault, and no impacts would occur. Strong Seismic Ground Shaking The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is located in close proximity to two major fault zones, including the Newport- Inglewood fault zone and the Whittier -Elsinore fault zone, each with the potential to cause moderate to large earthquakes that would cause ground shaking in Santa Ana and nearby communities. Consequently, the Overlay Zone would expose on -site structures and people to substantial seismic hazards if an intense earthquake occurred along any of the major faults in the area. Active and potentially active faults in the Santa Ana area are capable of producing seismic shaking at the project site. Additionally, it is anticipated that the project site would experience ground acceleration caused by small and moderate magnitude earthquakes on distant active faults. In order to reduce the risks associated with seismically induced groundshaking, it is necessary to take the location and type of subsurface materials into consideration when designing or retrofitting foundations and structures for a particular project site. Because the Overlay Zone site is in Seismic Zone 4, as is most of Southern California, structures are required to be designed in accordance with applicable parameters of the current California Building Code (CBC). Specific engineering design and construction measures as required by CBC for the construction of new buildings and/or structures would be implemented to anticipate and avoid the potential for adverse impacts to human life and property caused by seismically induced groundshaking. In addition, adherence to Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1 would further ensure that site -specific construction measures would be implemented to reduce any additional geotechnical hazards, including groundshaking. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 533 10/3/2023 Following the proper design guidelines and construction measures outlined in the CBC and as required by Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1 would reduce this risk to a less -than -significant level. Liquefaction The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is located in a low potential liquefaction hazard area as identified in the City's Seismic Safety Element of the General Plan. Despite being in a low hazard area for liquefaction, the City requires compliance with the CBC and all provisions related to construction and design guidelines which prevent injury or other adverse effects potentially caused by liquefaction. Among the provisions of the CBC that would be implemented by the Overlay Zone would be the conformance of all proposed facilities at the project site to the seismic - resistant design standards designated for Seismic Zone 4, and the incorporation of additional seismic -resistant earthwork and construction design criteria as recommended by project -specific geotechnical reports with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1. Adherence by the proposed development structures to CBC guidelines and geotechnical reports would ensure that proper foundations would be designed to safeguard against the potential risks associated with liquefaction. This impact was determined to be less than significant. Erosion/Loss of Topsoil The Certified EIR state that topsoil is the uppermost layer of soil, usually the top 6 to 8 inches. It has the highest concentration of organic matter and microorganisms and is where most biological soil activity occurs. Plants generally concentrate their roots in, and obtain most of their nutrients from, this layer. Topsoil erosion is of concern when the topsoil layer is blown or washed away, which makes plant life or agricultural production impossible. Much of the Overlay Zone is built out and topsoil erosion is, thus, not an issue for the majority of the area. However, there are limited undeveloped areas that could be affected by loss of topsoil if developed. Future development under the Overlay Zone could involve the demolition of existing structures, followed by grading and excavation activities prior to the construction of new development. The uncovered on -site soil would be exposed to erosional processes during these phases of construction. However, operational activities such as the addition of paved and landscaped areas would, over the long term, decrease the potential for erosion, particularly on the existing limited undeveloped sites, because less exposed soil would exist in the Overlay Zone. Specific erosion impacts would depend largely on the areas affected and the length of time soils are subject to conditions that would be affected by erosion processes. All demolition and construction activities within the City would be required to comply with CBC Chapter 70 standards, which would ensure implementation of appropriate measures during grading activities to reduce soil erosion. In addition, all construction activities would comply with Chapter 33 of the CBC, which regulates excavation activities and the construction of foundations, and Chapter 33 of the CBC, which regulates grading activities, including drainage and erosion control. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 534 10/3/2023 Further, all new development would also be subject to regional and local regulations pertaining to construction activities. Specifically, development that is greater than 5 acres would be required to comply with the provisions of the General Construction Activity Stormwater Permit adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), which would require the employment of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to limit the extent of eroded materials from a construction site. All development that is between 1 and 5 acres would be required to comply with the provisions of the NPDES Phase II regulations concerning the discharge of eroded materials and pollutants from construction sites. Compliance with the CBC and the NPDES permits would minimize effects from erosion and ensure consistency with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Water Quality Control Plan. In view of these regulations, it was determined that implementation of the Overlay Zone will have a less than significant impact associated with soil erosion or topsoil. No mitigation is required. Geologic Unit/Soil Stability The Certified EIR stated that the project site and surrounding area are relatively flat, making the possibility for landslides extremely remote. Consequently, there is no potential for landslides to occur on or near the Overlay Zone site as a result of the proposed development. The Overlay Zone would have no impact associated with exposing people or structures to landslides, and no impacts would occur. Using unsuitable soils would have the potential to create future lateral spreading, subsidence, or collapse problems leading to building settlement and/or utility line disruption. When weak soils are re -engineered specifically for stability prior to use, these potential effects can be reduced or eliminated. An acceptable degree of soil stability would be achieved for expansive, liquefaction - prone, and compressible soils by the incorporation of soil treatment programs (replacement, grouting, compaction, drainage control, etc.) in the excavation and construction plans to address site -specific soil conditions. A site -specific evaluation of ions is required by Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1 and must contain recommendations for ground preparation and earthwork specific to the site, that become an integral part of the construction design. As part of the construction permitting process, future developers in the Overlay Zone would be required to prepare geotechnical reports to identify potentially unsuitable soil conditions including liquefaction, subsidence, and collapse. The evaluations must be conducted by registered soil professionals, and measures to eliminate inappropriate soil conditions must be applied, depending on the soil conditions. Adherence to Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1 as well as specified design provisions in the CBC would ensure the maximum practicable protection available for users of buildings and infrastructure and associated trenches, slopes, and foundations. This impact was determined to be less than significant. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 535 10/3/2023 Expansive Soil The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is greater than 200 acres in size, and as such, does not contain uniform soil types throughout the Overlay Zone area. In addition, because implementation of the Overlay Zone does not identify specific development projects within the Overlay Zone, it would be inconclusive to classify the entire Overlay Zone as having a particular expansive soil potential because different soil types have varying degrees of expansion potential. Consequently, additional tests should be conducted at each future project site to determine the expansion potential of the near surface materials that may influence the structural elements of the projects. Final design recommendations should be based on the results of those tests. It was determined that with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-2, appropriate construction standards will ensure that impact of expansive soils on future development will be less than significant. Septic Tanks The Certified EIR stated that the City is almost entirely built out with established utility services and new development would not require the use of septic tanks. For this reason, it was determined that there will be no impact related to the capacity of soils to support septic tanks or other alternative wastewater disposal systems. Paleontological Resources The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone area is not known to contain documented paleontological resources. Plant and animal fossils are typically found within sedimentary rock deposits. Given the geology of the Overlay Zone area, it is unlikely that unknown paleontological resources would exist within the Overlay Zone. In addition, the Overlay Zone area has already been subject to extensive ground disturbance and development. Any superficial paleontological resources that could have existed at one time have likely been previously unearthed by past development activities. While not anticipated, the remote potential remains for intact paleontological resources to exist at deep levels. It was determined that implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.4-4 will reduce any potential impacts to less -than -significant levels. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.5-1 During project -specific building design of future development in the Overlay Zone, site -specific geotechnical studies shall be conducted under the direct supervision of a California Registered Engineering Geologist or licensed geotechnical engineer to assess detailed seismic, geological, soil, and groundwater conditions at each construction site and develop recommendations to prevent or abate any identified hazards. The report shall specify foundation recommendations to ensure issues associated with underlying soils are addressed. Construction of the project shall comply with all recommendations in the geotechnical report. The study shall follow Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 536 10/3/2023 applicable of CDMG Special Publication 117 where applicable and shall include, but not necessarily be limited to • Determination of the locations of any suspected fault traces and anticipated ground acceleration at the building site • Potential for displacement caused by seismically induced shaking, liquefaction, differential soil settlement, expansive and compressible soils, or other earth movements or soil constraints • Evaluation of depth to groundwater MM-OZ 4.5-2 Developers within the Overlay Zone shall conduct expansion index tests in accordance with UBC Standard 18-2 prior to project construction. The design of structural elements of future projects shall include recommendations set forth by the expansion index tests. MM-OZ 4.4-4 In the event that paleontological resources are unearthed during subsurface construction activities, all earth -disturbing work within a 100-meter radius of the find must be temporarily suspended or redirected until a paleontologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. 4.7.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. As discussed below, the Project would incorporate mitigation measures to minimize impacts related to geology and soils would be less than significant, and accordingly, would not result in any new or increased significant impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone The Certified EIR concluded that there are no Alquist-Priolo Zones within the Overlay Zone that would cause a fault rupture. The Overlay Zone is also not located within any currently mapped Seismic Hazard Zone, where a site -specific investigation to determine the location of any faults would be required. The Project Site is still not located in either an Alquist-Priolo or a Seismic Hazard Zone. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to being located in such a Zone beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 537 10/3/2023 Strong Seismic Ground Shaking The Certified EIR concluded that implementation of the Overlay Zone could expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic groundshaking. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1 would reduce this to a less -than -significant level. In compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1, a Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation Report has been prepared for the Project by LGC Valley, Inc., dated December 16, 2021 (refer to Attachment C). The report includes preliminary development standards that are specific to the Project and its potential to endure seismic groundshaking to ensure no significant impacts related to seismic groundshaking would occur. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to being located in a fault zone beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Liquefaction The Certified EIR concluded that implementation of the Overlay Zone could expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1 would reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level. In compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1, a Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation Report has been prepared for the Project by LGC Valley, Inc., dated December 16, 2021 (refer to Attachment C). The report noted that some soils at the Project Site are susceptible to liquefaction. The report includes preliminary development standards that are specific to the Project to ensure no significant impacts related to liquefaction would occur. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to liquefaction beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Erosion/Loss of Topsoil The Certified EIR concluded that implementation of the Overlay Zone could result in soil erosion and the loss of topsoil. However, compliance with applicable regulations would ensure that this impact remains less than significant. The Project would be required to comply with the same regulatory standards outlined in the Certified EIR that would ensure no significant impacts related to erosion/loss of topsoil would occur. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to erosion/loss of topsoil beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Geologic Unit/Soil Stability The Certified EIR concluded that implementation of the Overlay Zone could subject people and structures to hazards associated with lateral spreading, subsidence, or collapse. However, adherence to MM-OZ 4.5-1 and the CBC would ensure that this impact would be less than significant. In compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-1, a Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation Report has been prepared for the Project by LGC Valley, Inc., dated December 16, 2021 (refer to Attachment C). The report noted that soils at the Project Site are not subject to Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 538 10/3/2023 hydro -consolidation settlement, but the normal settlement that occurs from placing a building on top of soil would occur. The report includes preliminary development standards that are specific to the Project to ensure no significant impacts related to geologic unit/soil instability would occur. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to geologic unit/soil instability beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Expansive Soil The Certified EIR concluded that future development under the Overlay Zone could be located on expansive soil. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-2 would reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level. In compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.5-2, testing for expansive soils was conducted as part of the Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared for the Project by LGC Valley, Inc., dated December 16, 2021 (refer to Attachment C). The report noted that some soils at the Project Site have high expansive potential. The report includes preliminary development standards that are specific to the Project to ensure that no significant impacts related to expansive soil would occur. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to expansive beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Septic Tanks The Certified EIR concluded that new development would connect to the existing sewer system and would not use septic tanks. No impacts would occur. The Project would connect to the City's existing sewer system and would not require the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to expansive soils beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Paleontological Resources The Certified EIR concluded that implementation of the Overlay Zone has the potential to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site, or unique geologic feature, and this impact would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.4-4. The Project would include excavation beyond 10 feet below ground surface and would be required to implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.4-4 from the Certified EIR, requiring certain actions in the event that a potential resource is encountered during Project construction. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to paleontological resources beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. 4.7.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to geology and soils have occurred and no areas that are susceptible to geology and soil impacts have been identified within the vicinity of the Project Site since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 539 10/3/2023 4.7.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to geology and soils that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.7.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.5-1, MM-OZ 4.5-2, and MM-OZ 4.4- 4 from the Certified EIR 4.7.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant geology and soils impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified geology and soils impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to geology and soils do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 540 10/3/2023 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Substantially or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Would the project: (a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant NA NA NA NA No impact on the environment? (b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the NA NA NA NA No purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 4.8.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Generate GHG emissions/Consistency with Plans, Policies, and Regulations The topic of GHG Emissions impacts was not included in the 2007 CEQA Guidelines, and as such, was not included in the Certified EIR's analysis of the Overlay Zone's potential impacts. Since the approval of the Certified EIR, international agreements, as well as federal and state laws and regulations, have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions. However, recent California case law confirms that changes in the CEQA Guidelines only apply prospectively to CEQA documents that have not yet been circulated for public review and not to CEQA documents that rely on previously certified EIRs that complied with applicable CEQA requirements when publicly reviewed. The court in Olen Properties Corp. v. City of Newport Beach (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 270 recognized that impacts known of and understood at the time the EIR was certified do not constitute new information that would trigger recirculation. Both the existence of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel combustion and other activities were known at the time the Certified EIR was approved. California is a recognized leader in reducing GHG emissions and addressing climate change, and has enacted scores of legal requirements mandating reductions in fossil fuel use for electricity generation, adopting fuel and fleet standards to reduce GHG emissions from the transportation sector, improve energy and water efficiency and conservation in buildings and landscaping, and require GHG emissions reductions from virtually all economic sectors from agriculture, to manufacturing, to oil production, to waste management. Mitigation Measures Not applicable. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 541 10/3/2023 4.8.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? As stated above, the topic of GHG Emissions impacts was not included in the 2007 CEQA Guidelines but is included in the current version of the CEQA Guidelines. Since the approval of the Certified EIR, international agreements, as well as federal and state laws and regulations, have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions. However, both the existence of carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions from fossil fuel combustion and other activities were known at the time the Certified EIR was approved. Therefore, a GHG analysis is not required for the Project. Nevertheless, a detailed analysis of the Project's GHG emissions impacts is included in Attachment D of this document. As summarized below, the Project would not result in any significant impacts related to GHG emissions. Methodology CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a) assists lead agencies in determining the significance of the impacts of GHG emissions, giving them discretion to determine whether to assess impacts quantitatively or qualitatively. It calls for a good -faith effort to describe and calculate emissions. This emissions inventory also demonstrates the reduction in a project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions that results from regulations and requirements adopted as implementation efforts for these plans for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. As such, it provides further justification that a project is consistent with plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions by a project and over time. The significance of a project's GHG emissions impacts is not based on the amount of GHG emissions resulting from that project. The City, SCAQMD, Office of Planning and Research (OPR), CARB, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), and other applicable agencies have not adopted a numerical threshold of significance for assessing impacts related to GHG emissions. As a result, the methodology for evaluating a project's impacts related to GHG emissions focuses on its consistency with statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions. The analysis also calculates the amount of GHG emissions from the Project using recommended air quality models. The primary purpose of quantifying the Project's GHG emissions is to satisfy CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a). The estimated emissions inventory is also used to determine if there would be a reduction in the Project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions because of compliance with regulations requirements adopted to implement plans for reducing or mitigating GHG emissions. However, the significance of the Project's GHG emissions is not based on the amount of emissions from the Project as there is no adopted quantified threshold supported by substantial evidence. Attachment D of this document contains a detailed explanation of the methodology underlying this analysis. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 542 10/3/2023 Project Emissions In support of the consistency analysis below that describes the Project's compliance with, or exceedance of performance -based standards included in the regulations and policies outlined in the applicable portions of the 2022 Scoping Plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's Climate Action Plan (CAP), quantitative calculations are provided below. The Project would generate direct and indirect GHG emissions as a result of different types of emissions sources, including the following: • Construction: emissions associated with demolition of the existing uses, grading, and construction -related equipment and vehicular activity; • Area source: emissions associated with landscape equipment; • Energy source (building operations): emissions associated with electricity and natural gas use for space heating and cooling, water heating, energy consumption, and lighting; • Stationary source: emissions associated with stationary equipment (e.g., emergency generators); • Mobile source: emissions associated with vehicles accessing the Project Site; • Solid Waste: emissions associated with the decomposition of the waste, which generates methane based on the total amount of degradable organic carbon; and • Water/Wastewater: emissions associated with energy used to pump, convey, deliver, and treat water. Construction Emissions Project construction is anticipated to be completed in 2027 with occupancy the same year. The GHG emissions associated with construction of the Project were calculated for each year of construction activity. Construction of the Project is estimated to generate a total of 3,523 MTCO2e (refer to Table 12). As recommended by the SCAQMD, the total GHG construction emissions were amortized over the 30-year lifetime of the Project (i.e., total construction GHG emissions were divided by 30 to determine an annual construction emissions estimate that can be added to the Project's operational emissions) in order to determine the Project's annual GHG emissions inventory. This results in annual Project construction emissions of 117 MTCO2e. Table 12 Combined Construction -Related Emissions (MTCO,e) Year MTCO2ea 2024 293 2025 773 2026 1,517 2427Q Total 3,523 Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 543 10/3/2023 Amortized Over 30 Years 117 a CO2e was calculated using CaIEEMod version 2022.1.1.14. Refer to Attachment D. Source: DKA Planning, 2023. Operation Area Source Emissions Area source emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod emissions inventory model, which includes landscape maintenance equipment, use of consumer products, and other everyday sources. As shown in Table 13, the Project would result in 19 MTCO2e per year from area sources. Table 13 Annual GHG Emissions Summary (Buildout)a (metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent [MTCO2e11 Year MTCO2a Areab 19 Energy° (electricity and natural gas) 908 Mobile 3,355 Solid Wasted 186 Water/Wastewaters 53 Refrigerants 1 Construction 117 Total Emissions 4,639 a CO2e was calculated using CaIEEMod. b Area source emissions are from landscape equipment and other operational equipment only, hearths omitted. Energy source emissions are based on CaIEEMod default electricity and natural gas usage rates. d Solid waste emissions are calculated based on CaIEEMod default solid waste generation rates. e Water/Wastewater emissions are calculated based on CaIEEMod default water consumption rates. Source: DKA Planning, 2023. Refer to Attachment D. GHG emissions are emitted because of activities in buildings when electricity and natural gas are used as energy sources. Combustion of any type of fuel emits CO2 and other GHG emissions directly into the atmosphere. When electricity is used in a building, the electricity generation typically takes place off -site at the power plant; electricity use in a building generally causes emissions in an indirect manner. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 544 10/3/2023 Electricity and natural gas emissions were calculated for the Project using the CalEEMod emissions inventory model, which multiplies an estimate of the energy usage by applicable emissions factors chosen by the utility company. GHG emissions from electricity use are directly dependent on the electricity utility provider. In this case, GHG emissions intensity factors for SCE were selected in CalEEMod. The carbon intensity (pounds per megawatt an hour [lbs/MWh]) for electricity generation was calculated for the Project buildout year based on SCE projections. A straight-line interpolation was performed to estimate the SCE carbon intensity factor for the Project buildout year. SCE's carbon intensity projections also consider SIB 350 RPS requirements for renewable energy. This approach is conservative, given the 2018 chaptering of SIB 100 (De Leon), which requires electricity providers to provide renewable energy for at least 60 percent of their delivered power by 2030 and 100 percent use of renewable energy and zero -carbon resources by 2045. SIB 100 also increases existing renewable energy targets, called Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS), to 44 percent by 2024 and 52 percent by 2027. The 2022 Title 24 standards contain more substantial energy efficiency requirements for new construction, emphasizing the importance of building design and construction flexibility to establish performance standards that substantially reduce energy consumption for water hating, lighting, and insulation for attics and walls. Energy use in buildings is divided into energy consumed by the built environment and energy consumed by uses that are independent of the construction of the building, such as in plug-in appliances. CalEEMod calculates energy use from systems covered by Title 24 (e.g., HVAC system, water heating system, and lighting system); energy use from lighting; and energy use from office equipment, appliances, plug -ins, and other sources not covered by Title 24 or lighting. CaIEEMod electricity and natural gas usage rates are based on the CEC-sponsored California Commercial End -Use Survey (CEUS) and the California Residential Appliance Saturation Survey (RASS) studies. The data are specific for climate zones; therefore, Zone 11 was selected for the Project Site based on the zip code tool. As shown in Table 13, Project GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage would result in a total of 908 MTCO2e per year. Mobile Source Emissions Mobile -source emissions were calculated using the SCAQMD-recommended CaIEEMod emissions inventory model. CaIEEMod calculates the emissions associated with on -road mobile sources associated with residents, employees, visitors, and delivery vehicles visiting the Project Site based on the number of daily trips generated and VMT. Mobile source operational GHG emissions were calculated using CaIEEMod and are based on the Project's VMT analysis. The Project represents an infill development within an urbanized area that would concentrate mixed residential and commercial uses within an HQTA. The Project Site is in a dense mixed - use corridor with proximity to two OCTA local bus lines and the Metrolink Santa Ana station to the west. The Project would also incorporate characteristics that would reduce trips and VMT as Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 545 10/3/2023 compared to standard ITE trip generation rates. The Project characteristics listed below are consistent with the CAPCOA guidance document, Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, which provides emission reduction values for transportation related design techniques. These techniques would reduce vehicle trips and VMT associated with the Project relative to the standard ITE trip generation rates, which would result in a comparable reduction in VMT and associated GHG emissions. Techniques applicable to the Project include the following (a brief description of the Project's relevance to the measure is also provided): CAPCOA Measure LUT-1 - Increase Density: Increased density, measured in terms of persons, jobs, or dwelling units per unit area, reduces emissions associated with transportation as it reduces the distance people travel for work or services and provides a foundation for the implementation of other strategies, such as enhanced transit services. CAPCOA Measure LUT-3 - Increase Diversity of Urban and Suburban Developments (Mixed -Use): The Project would introduce new uses on the Project Site, including new residences and retail uses. The increases in land use diversity on the Project Site would reduce vehicle trips and VMT by encouraging visitors to walk and use non -automotive forms of transportation (i.e., public transit, biking), which would result in corresponding reductions in transportation -related emissions. CAPCOA Measure LUT-4 - Increase Destination Accessibility: The Project Site is in a dense corridor, which is easily accessible by public transportation. Access to multiple destinations, and commercial and retail uses in proximity to the Project Site would reduce vehicle trips and VMT compared to the statewide average and encourage walking and non -automotive forms of transportation and would result in corresponding reductions in transportation -related emissions because of the Project. CAPCOA Measure LUT-5 - Increase Transit Accessibility: The Project would be located near two OCTA bus routes and the Metrolink Santa Ana station. The Project would also provide bicycle parking spaces to encourage utilization of alternative modes of transportation. CAPCOA Measure LUT-9 - Improve Design of Development: The Project would enhance the pedestrian and bicycle environment through an attractive open space component and improved sidewalk and streetscape, which would enhance walkability in the Project vicinity. The Project would also locate a development with a high level of street access, which improves street accessibility and connectivity. CAPCOA Measure SDT-2 - Traffic Calming Measures: Providing traffic calming measures encourages people to walk or bike instead of using a vehicle. This mode shift results in a decrease in VMT. Streets within a half mile of the Project Site are equipped with sidewalks, and several of the intersections include marked crosswalks and/or count- down signal timers that calm traffic. CalEEMod calculates VMT based on the type of land use, trip purpose, and trip type percentages for each land use subtype in the project (primary, diverted, and pass -by). As shown in Table 13, the Project GHG emissions from mobile sources would result in a total of 3,355 MTCO2e per Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 546 10/3/2023 year. This estimate reflects reductions attributable to the Project's characteristics (e.g., infill project near transit that supports multi -modal transportation options), as described above. Solid Waste Generation Emissions Emissions related to solid waste were calculated using the CaIEEMod emissions inventory model, which multiplies an estimate of the waste generated by applicable emissions factors provided in Section 2.4 of the USEPA's AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. CaIEEMod solid waste generation rates for each applicable land use were selected for this analysis. As shown in Table 13, the Project scenario is expected to result in a total of 186 MTCO2e per year from solid waste that accounts for a 50-percent recycling/diversion rate.12 GHG emissions are related to the energy used to convey, treat, and distribute water, and treat wastewater. Thus, these emissions are generally indirect emissions from the production of electricity to power these systems. Three processes are necessary to supply potable water; these include (1) supply and conveyance of the water from the source; (2) treatment of the water to potable standards; and (3) distribution of the water to individual users. After use, energy is used as the wastewater is treated and reused as reclaimed water. Emissions related to water usage and wastewater generation were calculated for the Project using the CaIEEMod emissions inventory model, which multiplies an estimate of the water usage by the applicable energy intensity factor to determine the embodied energy necessary to supply potable water. GHG emissions are then calculated based on the amount of electricity consumed multiplied by the GHG emissions intensity factors for the utility provider. In this case, embodied energy for Southern California supplied water and GHG emissions intensity factors for SCE were selected in CaIEEMod. Water usage rates were calculated consistent with the requirements under the 2022 California Plumbing Code (which is based on the 2021 Uniform Plumbing Code), 2022 CALGreen, and reflect an approximately 20-percent reduction as compared to the base demand. As shown in Table 13, Project GHG emissions from water/wastewater usage would result in a total of 53 MTCO2e per year, which reflects a 20-percent reduction in water/wastewater emissions consistent with building code requirements as compared to the Project without sustainability features related to water conservation. Refriqe ants Emissions related to cooling structures and refrigeration needs were calculated using the CaIEEMod emissions inventory model. As shown in Table 13, the Project scenario is expected to result in a total of one MTCO2e per year from use of refrigerants that used HFCs and have high GWP values. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 547 10/3/2023 As shown in Table 13, when taking into consideration implementation of project design features, including the requirements set forth in the City's Green Building Code and the full implementation of current state mandates, the GHG emissions for the Project would equal 117 MTCO2e annually (as amortized over 30 years) during construction. Consistency with Applicable Plans and Policies The discussion below describes the extent to which the Project is consistent with or exceeds the performance -based standards included in the regulations outlined in the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's CAP. As discussed below, the Project would be substantially consistent with all applicable plans, policies, and regulations related to reduction of GHG emissions. This consistency analysis is provided for informational purposes only given that, although GHG emissions impacts were known and recognized when the City adopted the Certified EIR, these GHG emissions reduction plans and policies did not exist at that time. 6,4MM- 1 OMMIRM9111 iFWNilI'fTit:[1F. • �• Z!F1i1 The goal to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (Executive Order S-3-05) was codified by the Legislature as the 2006 Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32). In 2008, CARB approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan as required by AB 32 that has been updated over time to reflect updated strategies. In addition, SB 32 was approved in 2016, calling for deeper GHG emissions reductions by 2030. The 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan addresses the 2030 horizon but also addresses the objective of carbon neutrality by 2045 and has a range of GHG emissions reduction actions that include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non - monetary incentives, voluntary actions, market -based mechanisms such as a cap -and -trade system, and an AB 32 implementation fee to fund the program. The following discussion demonstrates how the pertinent reduction actions relate to and reduce project -related GHG emissions. Table 14 evaluates the Project's consistency with applicable reduction actions/strategies by emissions source category outlined in the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. When compared to SB 32, the Project would be substantially consistent with its objectives and the GHG reduction -related actions and strategies of the 2022 Scoping Plan. Table 14 confirms that the Project is consistent with the Scoping Plan's focus on increasing renewable energy use, putting more electric cars on the road, and improving energy efficiency. Although a number of these strategies are currently promulgated, some have not yet been formally proposed or adopted. It is expected that these measures or similar actions to reduce GHG emissions will be adopted as required to achieve statewide GHG emissions targets. Independent studies confirm CARB's determination that the state's existing and proposed regulatory framework will put the state on a pathway to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and to 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045 to meet carbon neutrality objectives if additional appropriate reduction measures are adopted. Even though these studies did not provide an exact regulatory and technological roadmap to achieve the 2030 and Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 548 10/3/2023 2050 goals, they demonstrated that various combinations of policies could allow the statewide emissions level to remain very low through 2045, suggesting that the combination of new technologies and other regulations not analyzed in the studies could allow the state to meet the 2045 target. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 549 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Chanqe Scopinq Plan Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Pronect Consistency Analysis No Conflict. The Project represents an infill development within an urbanized area that would VMT per capita reduced 25% concentrate new residences and Smart Growth / below 2019 levels by 2030, and SB 375: Reduce demand for fossil jobs within an HQTA and reduce Vehicle Miles 30% below 2019 levels by transportation fuels and GHG per capita VMT and GHG Traveled (VMT) 2045 emissions. The Project would be consistent with SIB 375 and its VMT reduction goals, as well as the GHG emissions and transportation EO N-79-20: Reduce demand for fossil No Conflict. Emissions from transportation fuels and GHGs and improve vehicle engines from the Project air quality. would be regulated by State regulations governing technology Light -duty Vehicle In November 2022, the Advanced Clean Cars and cleaner emissions. (LDV) Zero Emission o 100 /o of Light Duty Vehicle II regulations took effect, setting ZEV and Vehicles (ZEVs) sales are ZEV by 2035 plug-in hybrid vehicle sales requirements for model years 2026 to 2035 (ZEV program) and increasingly stringent emission standards (LEV program) to ensure automakers phase out sales of internal combustion enqine vehicles, EO N-79-20: Reduce demand for fossil No Conflict. While the Project transportation fuels and GHGs and improve would not generate substantial air quality. medium- and heavy-duty truck 100% of medium -duty traffic, it would not impede the (MDV)/HDV sales are ZEV by CARB's Advanced Clean Truck Regulation advancement of cleaner trucks 2040 (AB 74 University of accelerates the transition of zero -emission over time. Truck ZEVs California Institute of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles from 2024 Transportation Studies [ITS] to 2035. report) CARB also adopted the Innovative Clean Transit measure in 2018 that requires all public transit agencies to transition to zero emission fleets. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 550 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Chanqe Scopinq Plan Sector Actoons and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Pronect Consistency Analysis 20% of aviation fuel demand is CARB focuses on reducing emissions from No Conflict. This strategy focuses met by electricity (batteries) or ground support equipment and airport transit on industry availability of clean fuel hydrogen (fuel cells) in 2045. vehicles. It is also working with national and alternatives over time. The Project Aviation Sustainable aviation fuel meets international entities to tighten aircraft would not impede the advancement most or the rest of the aviation emission standards. of a cleaner aviation industry over fuel demand that has not AB 197: direct emissions reductions for time. already transitioned to sources covered by the AB 32 Inventory hydrogen or batteries. 2020 OGV At -Berth regulation AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. While the Project fully implemented, with most covered by the AB 32 Inventory would not directly impact trade or Ocean-going Vessels OGVs utilizing shore power by OGVs, it would not impede the (OGVs) 2027. 25% of OGVs utilize In 2015, Executive Order B-32-15 called. For a advancement of a cleaner on- or hydrogen fuel cell electric less polluting freight transport system that off -shore sources over time. technology by 2045. addressed OGVs, transport refrigeration units, and clean trucks_ Executive Order N-79-20: Reduce demand for No Conflict. While the Project petroleum fuels and GHGs and improve air would not directly impact trade or 100% of cargo handling quality. AB 197: direct emissions reductions for port operations, it would not impede equipment is zero -emission by sources covered by the AB 32 Inventory. the advancement of a cleaner on - Port Operations o 2037. 100 /o of drayage trucks shore sources over time. are zero emission by 2035. In 2015, Executive Order B-32-15 called. For a less polluting freight transport system that addressed OGVs, transport refrigeration units, and clean trucks. No Conflict. While the Project would not directly impact freight or 100% of passenger and other AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources passenger rail, it would not impede locomotive are ZEV by covered by the AB 32 Inventory the advancement of a cleaner Osales 2030. 100% of line haul locomotives over time. Freight and locomotive sales are ZEV by In 2015, Executive Order B-32-15 called. For a Passenger rail 2035. Line haul and passenger less polluting freight transport system that The Project's land uses would not rail rely primarily on hydrogen addressed OGVs, transport refrigeration units, include freight transportation or fuel cell technology, and others and clean trucks. warehousing that would be subject primarily utilize electricity. to the California Sustainable Freight Action Plan. Therefore, the Project would not interfere or Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 551 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Chanqe Scopinq Plan Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Pronect Consistency Analysis impede the implementation of the Sustainable Freight Action Plan, No Conflict. While the Project Reduce oil and gas extraction would not directly impact oil Oil and Gas operations in line with AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources extraction, it would help reduce Extraction petroleum demand by 2045. covered by the AB 32 Inventory demand for petroleum products from energy, area, and mobile sources. No Conflict. While the Project CCS on majority of operations by 2030, beginning in 2028 AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources would not directly impact oil Petroleum Refining Production reduced in line with covered by the AB 32 Inventory extraction, it would help reduce petroleum demand. demand for petroleum products that require refining. No Conflict. The Project would not Sector GHG target of 38 MMTCO2e in 2030 and 30 directly impact the sources of MMTCO2e in 2035. Retail SB 350 and SB 100: Reduce GHGs and electricity generation. sales load coverage 20 improve air quality. AB 197: direct emissions Electricity Generation gigawatts (GW) of offshore reductions for sources covered by the AB 32 wind by 2045. Meet increased Inventory demand for electrification without new fossil gas -fired resources. All electric appliances No Conflict. The Project would beginning 2026 (residential) incorporate appliances that are New Residential and and 2029 (commercial), AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources consistent with Title 24 and Green Commercial Buildings contributing to 6 million heat covered by the AB 32 Inventory Building requirements and pumps installed statewide by consistent with the reduction of 2030. residential and commercial energy use_ No Conflict. The Project would 80% of appliance sales are electric by 2030 and 100% of comply with Title 24 and Green Existing Residential appliance sales are electric by AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources Building requirements during Buildings 2035. Appliances are replaced covered by the AB 32 Inventory construction and any future retrofit at end of life such that by 2030 or appliance replacement there are 3 million all -electric and electric -ready homes — requirements. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 552 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Chanqe Scopinq Plan Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis and by 2035, 7 million homes — as well as contributing to 6 million heat pumps installed statewide by 2030. 80% of appliance sales are No Conflict. While the Project is electric by 2030, and 100% of not an existing commercial Existing Commercial appliance sales are electric by AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources development, it would not interfere Buildings 2045. Appliances are replaced covered by the AB 32 Inventory with any future requirements to at end of life, contributing to 6 retrofit commercial appliances. million heat pumps installed statewide by 2030. 7.5% of energy demand No Conflict. The Project would not Food Products electrified directly and/or AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources directly impact sources of energy indirectly by 2030; 75% by covered by the AB 32 Inventory for food production. 2045 25% of energy demand AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Construction electrified by 2030 and 75% covered by the AB 32 Inventory impact the production and Equipment electrified by 2045 availability of electrified construction equipment. No Conflict. The Project would not Electrify 0% of boilers by 2030 AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources Chemicals and Allied and 100% of boilers by 2045. covered by the AB 32 Inventory directly impact the sources of Products; Pulp and Hydrogen for 25% of process energy for boilers. Paper heat by 2035 and 100% by 2045 Electrify 100% of other energy demand by 2045. CCS on 40% of operations by SB 596: Reduce demand for fossil energy, No Conflict. The Project would not Stone, Clay, Glass, 2035 and on all facilities by process emissions, and GHGs, and improve air directly impact the sources of and Cement 2045 Process emissions quality. energy for stone, clay, glass, and reduced through alternative AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources cement facilities. materials and CCS covered by the AB 32 Inventor Other Industrial 0% energy demand electrified AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Manufacturing by 2030 and 50% by 2045 covered by the AB 32 Inventory directly impact the sources of enerqy for industrial facilitias- Combined Heat and AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Power Facilities retire by 2040. covered by the AB 32 Inventory affect facilities that produced heat and power. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 553 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Change Scopinq Plan Sector Actoons and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Agriculture Energy 25% energy demand AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Use electrified by 2030 and 75 /o by covered by the AB 32 Inventory affect directly agricultural sources 2045 AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. This regulatory covered by the AB 32 Inventory program applies to fuel suppliers, not directly to land use In November 2022, the Advanced Clean Cars II development. GHG emissions regulations took effect, setting low emission related to vehicular travel standards for transportation. associated with the Project would benefit from this regulation because fuel used by Project - related vehicles would be required Biomass supply is used to to comply with the LCFS. Mobile Low Carbon Fuels for produce conventional and source GHG emissions estimates Transportation advanced biofuels, as well as were calculated using CalEEMod hydrogen. that includes implementation of the LCFS into mobile source emission factors. The current LCFS targets a 20% reduction in Cl from a 2010 baseline by 2030. GHG emissions generated by Project -related vehicular travel would benefit from the Advanced Clean Cars Program. No Conflict. The Project would SB 350: The Clean Energy and Pollution In 2030s biomethane blended Reduction Act of 2015 increases the standards comply with this this action/strategy in pipeline Renewable of the California RPS program by requiring that being located within the Southern hydrogen blended in fossil gas the amount of electricity generated and sold to California Edison (SCE) and Low Carbon Fuels for pipeline at 7% energy (-20% retail customers per year from eligible Southern California Gas (SCG) Buildings and by volume), ramping up renewable energy resources be increased to service areas and would comply Industry between 2030 and 2040 In 50 percent by 2030. Required measures with CalGreen and Title 24 energy 2030s, dedicated hydrogen include increasing RPS to 50 percent of retail efficiency standards. SCE must pipelines constructed to serve sales by 2030, establishing annual targets for generate electricity that would certain industrial clusters statewide energy efficiency that achieve a cumulative doubling of statewide energy increase renewable energy Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 554 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Chanqe Scopinq Plan Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Prowect Consistency Analysis efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas and 50 percent by 2030. As SCE end uses by 2030. would provide electricity service to the Project Site, by 2030 the SB 100: The California Renewables Portfolio Project would use electricity Standard Program (2018) requires retail sellers consistent with the requirements of to procure renewable energy that is at least 50 SB 350. With regard to gas service, percent by December 31, 2026 and 60 percent SCG has committed to achieving by December 31, 2030. It requires local publicly net zero GHG emissions in its owned electric utilities to procure a minimum operations and delivery of gas by quantity of electricity from renewable energy 2045. This would be accomplished resources of 44 percent of retail sales by with clean fuels and hydrogen December 31, 2024 and 60 percent by technology, renewable natural gas, December 31, 2030. and hydrogen blends. As required under SB 350, doubling of the energy efficiency savings from retail customers by 2030 would primarily rely on the existing suite of building energy efficiency standards under CCR Title 24, Part 6 (consistency with this regulation is discussed below) and utility - sponsored programs such as rebates for high -efficiency appliances, HVAC systems, and insulation. Increase landfill and dairy SB 1383 (2016) requires CARB to set 2030 No Conflict. This program applies digester methane capture. emission reduction targets of 40 percent for to State regulators looking to Some alternative manure methane and hydrofluorocarbons and 50 reduce methane emissions from management deployed for percent black carbon emissions below 2013 landfill and dairy facilities and is not Non -combustion smaller dairies Moderate levels. The Project would comply with the directly related to development of Methane Emissions adoption of enteric strategies CARB SLCP Reduction Strategy by using the Project. However, the Project by 2030 Divert 75% of organic HVAC equipment with lower GWP refrigerants. would not interfere or impede waste from landfills by 2025. efforts to reduce such pollutants. Oil and gas fugitive methane emissions reduced 50% by 2030 and further reductions as Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 555 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Chanqe Scopinq Plan Sector Actoons and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis infrastructure components retire in line with reduced fossil as demand SB 605 (2014) directed CARB to develop a No Conflict. This program applies comprehensive Short -Lived Climate Pollutant to State regulators looking to Low GWP refrigerants (SLCP) strategy. reduce high GWP refrigerants and High GWP Potential introduced as building is not directly related to Emissions electrification increases, development of the Project. mitigating HFC emissions However, the Project would not interfere or impede efforts to reduce such r)ollutants, Conserve 30% of the state's No Conflict. This program applies NWL and coastal waters by to State regulators governing 2030. Implement near- and Natural and Working Lands and is long-term actions to EO N-82-20 and SB 27: CARB to include an not directly related to development accelerate natural removal of NWL target in the Scoping Plan. AB 1757: of the Project. However, the Project carbon and build climate Establish targets for carbon sequestration and would not interfere or impede Natural and Working resilience in our forests, nature -based climate solutions. implementation of the Integrated Lands wetlands, urban greenspaces, Natural and Working Lands agricultural soils, and land SIB 1386: NWL are an important strategy in Implementation Plan, EO N-82-20, conservation activities in ways me meeting GHG reduction goals. SB 27, or SB 1386. that serve all communities— and in particular low-income, disadvantaged, and vulnerable communities. At least 2.3 million acres Restore health and resilience to overstocked No Conflict. This program applies treated statewide annually in forests and prevent carbon losses from severe to State regulators governing forest forests, shrublands/chaparral, wildfire, disease, and pests. Improve air quality and shrubland management and is and grasslands, comprised of and reduce health costs related to wildfire not directly related to development Forests and regionally specific emissions. Improve water quantity and quality of the Project. However, the Project Shrublands management strategies that and improve rural economies. Provide forest would not interfere or impede include prescribed fire, biomass for resource utilization. implementation of EO B-52-18, AB thinning, harvesting, and other EO B-52-18: CARB to increase the opportunity 1504, or the Forest Carbon Plan. management actions. No land for using prescribed fire. conversion of forests, Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 556 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Chanqe Scopinq Plan Sector Actoons and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis shrublands/chaparral, or AB 1504 (Skinner, Chapter 534, Statutes of grasslands. 2010): CARB to recognize the role forests play in carbon sequestration and climate mitigation. At least 2.3 million acres No Conflict. This program applies treated includes increased to State regulators of grasslands management of grasslands and is not directly related to interspersed in forests to development of the Project. reduce fuels surrounding However, the Project would not Grasslands communities using interfere or impede efforts to management strategies reduce fuels in grasslands appropriate for grasslands. No surrounding communities. land conversion of forests, shrublands/chaparral, or Implement climate smart No Conflict. This program applies practices for annual and to State regulators overseeing perennial crops on-80,000 croplands and is not directly related acres annually. Land SB 859: Recognizes the ability of healthy soils to development of the Project. Croplands easements/ conservation on practices to reduce GHG emissions from However, the Project would not annual crops at -5,500 acres agricultural lands. interfere or impede SB 859 and annually. Increase organic efforts to increase organic agriculture to 20% of all agriculture and conserve cultivated acres by 2045 croplands. -65,000 acres annual) . Increase urban forestry No Conflict. This program applies investment by 200% above to State regulators addressing current levels and utilize tree urban forestry and is not directly watering that is 30% less AB 2251 (Calderon, Chapter 186, Statutes of related to development of the Developed Lands sensitive to drought. Establish 2022): Increase urban tree canopy 10 /o by Project. However, the Project defensible space that 2035. would not interfere or impede accounts for property implementation of AB 2251 and boundaries. efforts to increase the urban Restore 60,000 acres of Delta No Conflict. This program applies Wetlands wetlands to State regulators restoring Delta wetlands and is not directly related Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 557 10/3/2023 Table 14 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Chanqe Scopinq Plan Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Pronect Consistency Analysis to development of the Project. However, the Project would not interfere or impede efforts to restore wetland-eLptogias- No Conflict. This program applies to State regulators slowing the Land conversion at 50% of the conversion of sparsely vegetated Sparsely Vegetated Reference Scenario land lanes and is not directly related to Lands conversion rate. development of the Project. However, the Project would not interfere or impede efforts to slow urban conversion of such lands. Not Applicable. This applies to the AB 398 was enacted in 2017 to extend and clarify the role of the state's Cap -and -Trade market -based program to reduce Implement the post-2020 Cap- Program from January 1, 2021, through GHG emissions over time and is Cap -and -Trade and -Trade Program with December 31, 2030. As part of AB 398, not applicable to a development Program declining annual caps. refinements were made to the Cap -and -Trade project. program to establish updated protocols and allocation of proceeds to reduce GHG emissions. Source: DKA Planning, 2023 based on California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality, Scoping Plan Scenario. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1 — 558 10/3/2023 Based on the analysis in Table 14, the Project would be substantially consistent with the State's 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan's objective of achieving carbon neutrality statewide by 2045 and reducing 2030 GHG emissions in accord with SB 32. The Project would also benefit from statewide and utility -provider efforts towards increasing the portion of electricity provided from renewable resources. SCE has committed to increasing renewable sources that exceed the Renewables Portfolio Standard requirements. The Project would include energy efficient mechanical systems, energy efficient glazing and window frames, Energy -Star appliances to be installed on -site, and the use of high -efficiency lighting. The Project would also benefit from statewide efforts to improve fuel economy of vehicles. The Project would also help reduce VMT growth given its design and complementary mix of uses at an infill site that is accessible to existing public transit. As summarized in Table 15, the Project's attributes for reducing GHG emissions is also, on balance after weighing all of the requirements collectively, substantially consistent with the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan's suggested attributes for housing and mixed -use projects that are evaluated under CEQA. Table 15 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan (Key Residential and Mixed -Use Project Attributes That Reduce GHG Emissions) Priority Area Key Project Attribute Project Substantial Consistency Transportation Provides EV charging infrastructure that, at The Project would provide 90 Electrification minimum, meets the most ambitious spaces with electric vehicle charging voluntary standard in the California Green equipment. CalGreen's Tier 2 Building Standards Code at the time of voluntary standards include 40 project approval. percent of spaces with Level 2 EV charging receptacles, 15 percent of spaces equipped with Level 2 chargers, and one receptacle per dwelling unit. Thus, the Project would further the expansion of the EV charging network. The Project is located on an urban VMT Reduction Is located on infill sites that are surrounded by existing urban uses and infill site in an HQTA along a major reuses or redevelops previously regional arterial that is served by two undeveloped or underutilized land that is public transit bus lines (OCTA local presently served by existing utilities and Lines 64 and 71), Metrolink's Santa essential public services (e.g., transit, Ana station, as well as water and streets, water, sewer). sewer service. Does not result in the loss or conversion The Project is located on an urban of natural and working lands. infill site that is currently unused. There are no natural or working lands Site on the Promect Consists of transit -supportive densities The Project would be fully consistent (minimum of 20 residential dwelling units with this attribute, as it would provide per acre) or Is in proximity to existing a density of 56.5 residences per acre transit stops (within a half mile) or satisfies and would be located on an urban more detailed and stringent criteria infill site along a major regional specified in the re ion's SCS. arterial that is served by two public Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 559 10/3/2023 Table 15 Consistency Analysis-2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan (Key Residential and Mixed -Use Project Attributes That Reduce GHG Emissions) Priority Area Building Decarbonization Key Project Attribute Reduces parking requirements by: Eliminating parking requirements or including maximum allowable parking ratios (i.e., the ratio of parking spaces to residential units or square feet); or Providing residential parking supply at a ratio of less than one parking space per dwelling unit; or for multifamily residential development, requiring parking costs to be unbundled from costs to rent or own a residential unit. At least 20 percent of units included are affordable to lower -income residents Results in no net loss of existing affordable units Uses all -electric appliances without any natural gas connections and does not use propane or other fossil fuels for space Project Substantial Consistency transit bus lines (OCTA local Lines 64 and 71), Metrolink's Santa Ana station. The Project provides 2 parking spaces per apartment unit (including guest spaces) and 2.2 units per townhouse. Project parking would be unbundled. The Project would be a market -rate residential development with no units dedicated to affordable housing for lower -income residents. However, the Project would be required to pay an affordable housing in lieu fee in compliance with Article XV111.1 of Chapter 41 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code to further the production of affordable housing units and development within the City_ The Project would not remove any housing or affordable housing units; rather, it would increase the housing stock of market -rate and affordable housing units through payment of an in lieu fee. The Project would result in a net increase of 507 total units which consists of wide range of housing types, including apartment units at different bedroom counts and townhome style units. The Project would comply with Title 24 and CalGreen standards. Source: Priority Areas and Key Project Attributes from California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality, Appendix D (Local Actions) Table 3; November 2022. The 2022 Scoping Plan notes that these project attributes are intended as a guide to help local jurisdictions qualitatively identify those residential and mixed -use projects that are clearly consistent with the state's climate goals, since these attributes address the largest sources of operational emissions for residential projects. However, lead agencies may determine, with Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 560 10/3/2023 adequate additional supporting evidence, that projects that incorporate some, but not all, of the key project attributes are consistent with the State's climate goals. Based on the above - referenced compliance with many aspects of the Plan's residential and mixed -use infill, transit proximate and sustainability attributes, the Project has been determined to be substantially consistent overall with the 2022 Scoping Plan. Table 16 includes an analysis of the Project's consistency with the GHG-related objectives of the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Table 16 Consistency with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Objectives Consistency Analysisa Increase percentage of region's total The Project would result in an increase of 507 households in an household growth occurring within HQTAs. HQTA, including both townhomes and attached apartments. Increase percent of the region's total The Project is an infill development that would create more employment growth occurring within HQTAs. service -related retail and commercial jobs, consistent with the 2020 RTP/SCS policies and would focus on job growth in HQTAs. Decrease total acreage of greenfield or The Project is an infill development that would reduce the otherwise rural land uses converted to urban demand for sprawl development in greenfield or rural areas on use. the fringes of Southern California. Decrease daily vehicle miles driven per The Project is an infill development amid heavy transit person. infrastructure that would reduce daily VMT per capita. The Project is served by two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station to the west. Decrease average daily distance traveled for The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor work and non -work trips (in miles) with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce per capita travel distances. Increase percentage of work and non -work The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor trips which are less than 3 miles in length. with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would increase the rate of travel less than three miles in length. Increase share of short trip lengths for The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor commute purposes. with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would shorten commute trips. Decrease average minutes of delay The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor experienced per capita due to traffic within an HQTA and within a heavy density of housing and jobs congestion. amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 561 10/3/2023 Table 16 Consistency with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Objectives Consistency Analysisa transit and active transportation mode share given its location along this major corridor. Decrease excess travel time resulting from The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor the difference between a reference speed with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit and actual speed. infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit and active transportation mode share given its location. As such, the Project would help reduce recurrent traffic congestion delay for general vehicles. Decrease excess travel time for heavy-duty The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor trucks result from the difference between with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit reference speed and actual speed. infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit and active transportation mode share. As such, the Project would help reduce recurrent traffic congestion delay for heavy-duty trucks. Increase percentage of PM peak period trips The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor completed within 45 minutes by travel mode. with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit accessibility. Because the Project's location will attract travel to and from the corridor and local community, the share of PM peak period trips that are less than 45 minutes would increase when compared to an urban sprawl location. Increase percentage of trips that use transit The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor (work and all trips) with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would help increase transit mode share. Decrease average travel time to work (all The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor modes) with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit and active transportation mode share given its location along the corridor. As such, average travel time to work should be reduced when compared to an urban sprawl location. Increase percentage of trips using either The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor walking or biking (by trip type) with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 562 10/3/2023 Table 16 Consistency with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Objectives Consistency Analysisa growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit accessibility along the corridor. Reduce per capita GHG emissions (from The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor 2005 levels) within an HQTA with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit accessibility. As such, it is consistent with AB 32, SB 32, SB 375, and other initiatives designed to reduce per capita GHG emissions from 2005 levels. Increase percentage of trips using a travel The Project is an infill development in the dense urban corridor mode other than single occupancy vehicle with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit (SOV) infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in SOV use and congestion by virtue of its transit accessibility within walking distance of the Project Site. Locally, the City has several conservation -based plans, programs, and requirements that also indirectly produce GHG reductions. While these are not considered climate action plans, the Project's consistency with these local initiatives is summarized below for informational purposes. Santa Ana Climate Action Plan The 2022 CAP provides a summary table of Climate -Ready Development Standards, including mandatory measures that are applicable to development projects. It should be noted that most of the CAP's measures are voluntary, with financial incentives available to promote increased implementation of those measures. As shown in Table 17, the Project would be substantially consistent with the City's CAP. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 563 10/3/2023 Table 17 Project Consistency with the Santa Ana CAP Source Measure Consistency The Project includes retail uses along Fourth Street Development of Local Retail and Cabrillo Town Drive that would serve the Project Service Nodes and the larger Santa Ana community that would help reduce VMT associated with travel to retail services. The Project includes 507 residences along Fourth Local Residential Nodes Near Street and Cabrillo Town Drive on a largely Transportation Retail and Employment commercial corridor that would help reduce VMT and Land Use associated with travel from residences. Measures The Project includes retail and commercial uses along Local Employment Nodes Fourth Street and Cabrillo Town Drive that would Near Residential and Retail serve the Project Site and the larger Santa Ana Areas community that would help reduce VMT associated with travel to retail services within an HQTA. End of Trip Facilities in New The Project includes short- and long-term parking for Projects bicycles for both residents and commercial tenants. Title 24 Energy Efficiency The Project would meet energy efficiency Community- Standards — Commercial. requirements for the commercial spaces and comply Wide Energy with current 2022 CalGreen requirements. Title 24 Energy Efficiency The Project would meet energy efficiency Measures Standards — Residential. requirements for the residential spaces. AB 341 Commercial and Residential and commercial tenants would have full - Solid Waste, Multifamily Recycling. service recycling options consistent with AB 341 that Water, and would help increase diversion of waste from landfills. The Project would provide artificial turf in its common Wastewater Measures Turf Removal. areas and courtyards that would reduce water consumption. Source: City of Santa Ana, Climate Action Plan (Final); December 2015. Post-2030 Analysis Recent studies show that the state's existing and proposed regulatory framework will put the state on a pathway to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 if additional appropriate reduction measures are adopted.13 Even though these studies did not provide an exact regulatory and technological roadmap to achieve the 2030 and 2050 goals, they demonstrated that various combinations of policies could allow the statewide emissions level to remain very low through 2050, suggesting that the combination of new technologies and other regulations not analyzed in the studies could allow 13 Energy and Environmental Economics (E3). "Summary of the California State Agencies' PATHWAYS Project: Long-term Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scenarios" (April 2015); Greenblatt, Jeffrey, Energy Policy, "Modeling California Impacts on Greenhouse Gas Emissions" (Vol. 78, pp. 158-172). The California Air Resources Board, California Energy Commission, California Public Utilities Commission, and the California Independent System Operator engaged E3 to evaluate the feasibility and cost of a range of potential 2030 targets along the way to the state's goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. With input from the agencies, E3 developed scenarios that explore the potential pace at which emission reductions can be achieved, as well as the mix of technologies and practices deployed. E3 conducted the analysis using its California PATHWAYS model. Enhanced specifically for this study, the model encompasses the entire California economy with detailed representations of the buildings, industry, transportation, and electricity sectors. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council ."- 18 — 564 10/3/2023 the state to meet the 2050 target. After the findings of these studies, SB 32 was passed on September 8, 2016, and would require the state board to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 40 percent below the 1990 level by 2030. As discussed above, the new plan, outlined in SB 32, involves increasing renewable energy use, imposing tighter limits on the carbon content of gasoline and diesel fuel, putting more electric cars on the road, improving energy efficiency, and curbing emissions from key industries. As discussed above, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS establishes a regulatory framework for achieving GHG reductions from the land use and transportation sectors pursuant to SB 375 and the state's long-term climate policies. The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS ensures VMT reductions and other measures that reduce regional emissions from the land use and transportation sectors. The Project is the type of land use development that is encouraged by the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS to reduce VMT and expand multi -modal transportation options for the region to achieve the GHG reductions from the land use and transportation sectors required by SB 375, which, in turn, advances the state's long-term climate policies. By furthering implementation of SB 375, the Project supports regional land use and transportation GHG reductions substantially consistent with state climate targets for 2020 and beyond. In addition, the Project would be consistent with the Actions and Strategies set forth in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Conclusion Given the Project's substantial consistency with state, SCAG, and City GHG emissions reduction goals and objectives, the Project is consistent with applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG emissions. In the absence of adopted standards and established significance thresholds, and given this consistency, it is concluded that the Project's incremental contribution to GHG emissions and their effects on climate change would not be cumulatively considerable. Mitigation Measures None required. 4.8.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? Although the topic of GHG emissions is new to the CEQA Guidelines (when compared to the 2006 CEQA Guidelines), as demonstrated above for informational purposes, the Project would be substantially consistent with all applicable GHG emissions reduction plans and would not result in any significant impacts related to GHG emissions. Thus, the Project would not result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts as compared with the potential GHG impacts resulting from a Project consistent with the uses, building density and intensity and envelope permitted by the Overlay Zone assumed in the Certified EIR . Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 565 10/3/2023 4.8.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? Although the topic of GHG emissions is new to the CEQA Guidelines (when compared to the 2006 CEQA Guidelines), as demonstrated above for informational purposes, the Project would be substantially consistent with all applicable GHG emissions reduction plans and would not result in any significant impacts related to GHG emissions as could have occurred at the time of adoption of the Certified EIR, given the Project's consistency with the Overlay Zone's permitted uses, intensity, density and building envelope. Thus, the Project would not result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts than could have occurred at the time of the Certified EIR. Further, GHG emissions -related impacts have long been known and understood at the time the Certified EIR was certified, and therefore, does not constitute new information for the purposes of this analysis. 4.8.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts None required. 4.8.6 Conclusion Although the topic of GHG emissions is new to the CEQA Guidelines (when compared to the 2006 CEQA Guidelines), as demonstrated above for informational purposes, the Project would be substantially consistent with all applicable GHG emissions reduction plans and would not result in any significant impacts related to GHG emissions. Thus, the Project would not result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 566 10/3/2023 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Substantially or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: (a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the Less Than environment through the routine transport, use, or Significant with No No No Yes disposal of hazardous Mitigation materials? (b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the reasonably foreseeable Less Than upset and accident Significant With No No No Yes conditions involving the Mitigation likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous Less Than materials, substances, or Significant No No No No waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Less Than Government Code Significant with g No No No No §65962.5 and, as a result, Mitigation would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles Less Than of a public airport or Significant With g No No No No public use airport, would Mitigation the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? (f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with Less Than an adopted emergency Significant With No No No Yes response plan or Mitigation emergency evacuation plan? (g) Expose people or No Impact No No No No structures either directly Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 567 10/3/2023 Impact Issues (and supporting Determination Information Sources) in EIR or indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? 4.9.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Substantially or Substantially More Severe More Severe Impacts? Impacts? Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials Any New Information of Substantial Importance? Project Incorporates Mitigation Measure(s)? The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is characterized by office and commercial facilities. Implementation of the Overlay Zone would introduce residential uses and create a mixed -use area that is divided into four distinct districts. While the residential, commercial and office mixed - uses that could be developed under Overlay Zone are not expected to introduce any unusual hazardous materials to the area, some hazardous materials would be used in varying amounts during construction and operation of future occupation and would consist mostly of typical household -type cleaning products as well as maintenance products (e.g., paints, solvents, cleaning products). Additionally, grounds and landscape maintenance within the development area could also use a wide variety of commercial products formulated with hazardous materials, including fuels, cleaners and degreasers, solvents, paints, lubricants, adhesives, sealers, and pesticides/herbicides. Exposure of persons to hazardous materials could occur in the following manners: improper handling or use of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes during construction or operation of future developments, particularly by untrained personnel; transportation accident; environmentally unsound disposal methods; or fire, explosion or other emergencies. The types and amounts of hazardous materials would vary according to the nature of the activity. In some cases, it is the type of hazardous material that is potentially hazardous; in others, it is the amount of hazardous material that could present a hazard. Whether a person exposed to a hazardous substance would suffer adverse health effects depends upon a complex interaction of factors that determine the effects of exposure to hazardous materials: the exposure pathway (the route by which a hazardous material enters the body); the amount of material to which the person is exposed; the physical form (e.g., liquid, vapor) and characteristics (e.g., toxicity) of the material; the frequency and duration of exposure; and the individual's unique biological characteristics, such as age, gender, weight, and general health. Adverse health effects from exposure to hazardous materials may be short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic). Acute effects can include damage to organs or systems in the body and possibly death. Chronic effects, which may result from long-term exposure to a hazardous material, can also include organ or systemic damage, but chronic effects of particular concern Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 1,1418 — 568 10/3/2023 include birth defects, genetic damage, and cancer. Implementation of existing hazardous materials regulations were established at the state level to ensure compliance with federal regulations to reduce the risk to human health and the environment from the routine use of hazardous substances. All new developments that handle or use hazardous materials would be required to comply with existing regulations, standards, and guidelines established by the EPA, State, Orange County, and the City of Santa Ana related to storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials. Specific requirements for implementation of these statutes are codified in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Additional regulations that apply to workplace safety are contained in CFR Titles 8 and 29. Regulations that pertain to radioactive materials are included in CFR Title 10. The USDOT Office of Hazardous Materials Safety prescribes strict regulations for the safe transportation of hazardous materials, as described in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and implemented by Title 13 of the CCR. Additionally, both the federal and state governments require all businesses that handle more than a specified amount of hazardous materials to submit a business plan to a regulatory agency. Specifically, any new business that meets the specified criteria must submit a full hazardous materials disclosure report that includes an inventory of the hazardous materials generated, used, stored, handled, or emitted; and emergency response plans and procedures to be used in the event of a significant or threatened significant release of a hazardous material. Specific requirements for implementation are codified primarily in Title 26 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) and Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code. Hazardous materials are required to be stored in designated areas designed to prevent accidental release to the environment. California Building Code (CBC) requirements prescribe safe accommodations for materials that present a moderate explosion hazard, high fire or physical hazard, or health hazards. Compliance with all applicable federal and state laws related to the storage of hazardous materials would be implemented to maximize containment (through safe handling and storage practices) and to provide for prompt and effective cleanup if an accidental release occurs. Adherence to existing regulations would ensure compliance with safety standards related to the use and storage of hazardous materials, and the safety procedures mandated by applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations (RCRA, California Hazardous Waste Control Law, and principles prescribed by the California Department of Health Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Institutes of Health), which would ensure that risks resulting from the routine transportation, use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes associated with construction and implementation of the Overlay Zone would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. The Certified EIR also stated implementation of the Overlay Zone would not result in land uses that would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. However, it is possible that existing uses within the vicinity could create a significant hazard to future residents of the Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 569 10/3/2023 area. The Overlay Zone is located directly between two heavily traveled freeways (1-5 and SR- 55), which could emit hazardous amounts of diesel exhaust. Due to the proximity of the freeways and the potential increase in residential uses as a result of project implementation, this could pose a potentially significant impact. In order to ensure that existing conditions within the Overlay Zone area do not pose a significant health threat to future uses, compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-1 would be required. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-1 would ensure that risks associated with diesel emissions from the nearby freeways would be thoroughly evaluated prior to construction of residential uses. The health risk assessments would identify any unacceptable risk and would provide recommendations to reduce the risk within acceptable limits. Thus, development within the Overlay Zone would not pose an actual or potential endangerment to future residents. Therefore, it was determined that this impact will be reduced to a less than significant level. Release of Hazardous Materials The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone would primarily result in urban infill and redevelopment with mixed -uses within the Overlay Zone area, existing structures may need to be demolished prior to the construction of new buildings. Demolition of existing structures could result in exposure of construction personnel and the public to hazardous substances such as asbestos or lead -based paints, depending on the age of the structure. In addition, the disturbance of soils and the demolition of existing structures could result in the exposure of construction workers or employees to health or safety risks if contaminated structures and/or soils are encountered during construction. Exposure to contaminated structures or soil could occur from asbestos or lead in older buildings, unknown contaminants that have not previously been identified, or existing contamination present at locations identified in the site records search. Exposure to hazardous materials during construction activities could occur through any of the following: • Direct dermal contact with hazardous materials • Incidental ingestion of hazardous materials (usually due to improper hygiene, when workers fail to wash their hands before eating, drinking, or smoking) • Inhalation of airborne dust released from dried hazardous materials While specific development projects are not associated with approval of the Overlay Zone it is assumed that older buildings could be demolished as uses are redeveloped according to the overlay zone. With that activity, construction workers and nearby workers and/or future residents could potentially be exposed to airborne lead -based paint dust, asbestos fibers, and/or other contaminants. In addition, there is the possibility that future development may also uncover previously undiscovered soil contamination as well as result in the release of potential contaminants that may be present in building materials (e.g., mold, lead, etc.). It was determined that this could result in a potentially significant impact. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 570 10/3/2023 Federal and State regulations govern the renovation and demolition of structures where materials containing lead and asbestos are present. These requirements include: SCAQMD Rules and Regulations pertaining to asbestos abatement (including Rule 1403), Construction Safety Orders 1529 (pertaining to asbestos) and 1532.1 (pertaining to lead) from Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 61, Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations (pertaining to asbestos), and lead exposure guidelines provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Asbestos and lead abatement must be performed and monitored by contractors with appropriate certifications from the State Department of Health Services. In addition, Cal/OSHA has regulations concerning the use of hazardous materials, including requirements for safety training, availability of safety equipment, hazardous materials exposure warnings, and emergency action and fire prevention plan preparation. Cal/OSHA enforces the hazard communication program regulations, which include provisions for identifying and labeling hazardous materials, describing the hazards of chemicals, and documenting employee -training programs. All demolition that could result in the release of lead and/or asbestos must be conducted according to Cal/OSHA standards. It was determined that adherence to existing regulations, which require appropriate testing and abatement actions for hazardous materials, will ensure that impacts are less than significant. Unknown Contaminated Sites Aside from the potential release of hazardous materials from demolition of existing structures within the Overlay Zone, grading and excavation of sites for future development resulting from implementation of the Overlay Zone may also expose construction workers and the public to potentially unknown hazardous substances present in the soil or groundwater. If any unidentified sources of contamination are encountered during grading or excavation, the removal activities required could pose health and safety risks such as the exposure of workers, materials handling personnel, and the public to hazardous materials or vapors. Such contamination could cause various short-term or long-term adverse health effects in persons exposed to the hazardous substances. In addition, exposure to contaminants could occur if the contaminants migrated from the contaminated zone to surrounding areas either before or after the surrounding areas were developed, or if contaminated zones were disturbed by future development at the contaminated location. If exposed to hazardous substances, this would result in a significant hazard to the public. It is also possible that old underground storage tanks (USTs) that were in use prior to permitting and record keeping requirements may be present in the Overlay Zone. If an unidentified UST were uncovered or disturbed during construction activities, it would be closed in place or removed. Removal activities could pose both health and safety risks, such as the exposure of workers, tank handling personnel, and the public to tank contents or vapors. Potential risks, if any, posed by USTs would be minimized by managing the tank according to existing Orange County standards Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 571 10/3/2023 as enforced and monitored by the Department of Environmental Health. The extent to which groundwater may be affected, if at all, depends on the type of contaminant, the amount released, and depth to groundwater at the time of the release. If groundwater contamination is identified, remediation activities would be required by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) prior to the commencement of any new construction activities. Existing Contaminated Sites Another potential hazard to construction workers and the public could involve construction activities on existing sites that may potentially be contaminated. However, any new development occurring on these documented hazardous materials sites would have to be preceded by remediation and cleanup under the supervision of the State Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) before construction activities could begin, if such actions have not already occurred. In order to address the potential for encountering contamination within the Overlay Zone, Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.6-2 and MM-OZ 4.6-3 will minimize the potential risk of contamination by implementing investigation and remediation efforts at future development sites. As such, the potential impacts associated with unknown contamination will be reduced to a less than significant level. Compliance with existing regulations and implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.6-2 and MM-OZ4.6-3 would ensure that construction workers and the general public would not be exposed to any unusual or excessive risks related to hazardous materials during construction activities. As such, it was determined that impacts associated with the exposure of construction workers and the public to hazardous materials during construction activities will be less than significant. The United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Office of Hazardous Materials Safety prescribes strict regulations for the safe transportation of hazardous materials, as described in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and implemented by Title 13 of the CCR. The transportation of hazardous materials can result in accidental spills, leaks, toxic releases, fire, or explosion. It is possible that licensed vendors could bring some hazardous materials to and from new retail -commercial sites in the Overlay Zone as a result of the subsequent projects constructed pursuant to the proposed project. However, appropriate documentation for all hazardous waste that is transported in connection with specific project -site activities would be provided as required for compliance with existing hazardous materials regulations codified in Titles 8, 22, and 26 of the California Code of Regulations, and their enabling legislation set forth in Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code. In addition, specific project -site developers shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 572 10/3/2023 pertaining to the transport, use, disposal, handling, and storage of hazardous waste, including but not limited to, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Compliance with all applicable Federal and State laws related to the transportation of hazardous materials would reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents during transit, thereby ensuring that a less than significant impact would occur. No mitigation is required. Hazardous materials are required to be stored in designated areas designed to prevent accidental release to the environment. California Building Code (CBC) requirements prescribe safe accommodations for materials that present a moderate explosion hazard, high fire or physical hazard, or health hazards. Compliance with all applicable Federal and State laws related to the storage of hazardous materials would be implemented to maximize containment (through safe handling and storage practices described above) and to provide for prompt and effective clean- up if an accidental release occurs, thereby ensuring that a less than significant impact would occur. No mitigation is required. Hazardous materials use would present a slightly greater risk of accident than hazardous materials storage. However, for those employees who would work with hazardous materials, the amount of hazardous materials that are handled at any one time are generally relatively small, reducing the potential consequences of an accident during handling. Further, specific project -site activities would be required to comply with Federal and State laws to eliminate or reduce the consequence of hazardous materials accidents. For example, employees who would work around hazardous materials would be required to wear appropriate protective equipment, and safety equipment is routinely available in all areas where hazardous materials are used. The Santa Ana Fire Department Haz-Mat personnel responds to hazardous materials incidents. Major hazardous materials accidents associated with retail -commercial uses are extremely infrequent, and additional emergency response capabilities are not anticipated to be necessary to respond to the potential incremental increase in the number of incidents that could result from implementation of the proposed project. Further, adherence to applicable regulations as discussed above would be required to reduce any potential consequences of a hazardous materials operational accident. Thus, impacts related to the use of hazardous materials would be less than significant. Compliance with Titles 8, 22, 26, and 49 of the California Code of Regulations, and their enabling legislation set forth in Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code, would ensure that this impact is less than significant by requiring compliance with applicable laws and regulations that would reduce the risk of hazardous materials use, transportation, and handling through the Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 573 10/3/2023 implementation of established safety practices, procedures, and reporting requirements. No mitigation is required. Release Hazardous Materials Near a School The Certified EIR stated that there are two schools located within one -quarter mile of the Overlay Zone. No additional schools are proposed in the Overlay Zone as part of the Overlay Zone. As discussed previously, limited amounts of some hazardous materials could be used in the construction and operation of new developments in the Overlay Zone, including the use of standard construction materials (e.g., paints, solvents, and fuels), cleaning and other maintenance products (used in the maintenance of buildings, pumps, pipes and equipment), diesel and other fuels (used in construction and maintenance equipment and vehicles), and the limited application of pesticides associated with landscaping around new developments. None of these materials would result in hazardous emissions or are considered acutely hazardous. Although hazardous materials and waste generated from future development may pose a health risk to nearby schools, all businesses that handle or have on -site transportation of hazardous materials would be required to comply with the provisions of the City's Fire Code and any additional elements as required in the California Health and Safety Code Article 1 Chapter 6.95 for Business Emergency Plan. As described previously, both the federal and state governments require all businesses that handle more than a specified amount of hazardous materials to submit a business plan to a regulatory agency. The routine transport, use, and disposal of these materials would be subject to a wide range of laws and regulations intended to minimize potential health risks associated with their use or the accidental release of such substances. Compliance with existing regulations would minimize the risks associated with the exposure of sensitive receptors, including schools, to hazardous materials. This impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Listed Hazardous Materials Site The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone contains sites that have been identified on various regulatory databases as being contaminated from the release of hazardous substances in the soil, including d storage tanks and small -quantity generators of hazardous waste. Implementation of the Overlay Zone could lead to development of these sites. As discussed under Impact 4.6-3, development of these sites would be required to undergo remediation and cleanup before construction activities can begin. If contamination at any specific project site were to exceed regulatory action levels, the proponent would be required to undertake remediation procedures prior to grading and development under the supervision of appropriate regulatory oversight agencies (e.g., Santa Ana Fire Department, Orange County Environmental Health Division, Department of Toxic Substances Control, or Regional Water Quality Control Board), depending on the nature of any identified contamination. Thus, implementation of Mitigation Measures MM- OZ 4.6-2 and MM-OZ 4.6-3, above, would ensure that contaminated sites undergo remediation activities prior to development activities. Consequently, if future development under the Overlay Zone is located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites, remediation would Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 574 10/3/2023 ensure that this impact would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Airport Hazards The Certified EIR stated that John Wayne Airport (JWA) is the nearest public airport, which is located approximately 6.5 miles to the southwest of the Overlay Zone. As discussed previously in the Regulatory Framework, the Overlay Zone is located within a height restriction of 200 feet that overlays the entirety of Orange County. Because land uses that may occur in the Active Urban district under the Overlay Zone could exceed 200 feet in height, any such uses (over 200 feet in height) would subsequently fall within the Airport Planning Area for JWA. Therefore, any construction or alteration of more than 200 feet in height above the ground level at a project site requires filing with the FAA. Projects meeting this threshold must comply with procedures provided by Federal and State law, including filing a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1). Specifically, filing the FAA Form 7460-1 would be required for any proposed structure that would be greater than 200 feet in height, at which time FAA would conduct an aeronautical study to determine if the structure would have an adverse effect on the airport or on aeronautical operations. Subsequent to the findings of the FAA aeronautical study, the project would be subject to ALUC consistency review. As mentioned previously, development in the Active Urban district under the Overlay Zone could involve structures that exceed 200 feet in height. Development in the Neighborhood Transitional and Village Center districts would be more restricted in height limitations and would not be expected to exceed 200 feet in height. Because specific development projects are not proposed in the Overlay Zone, it is unknown whether future developments would actually be greater than 200 feet. Additionally, it is possible that during the temporary construction period of projects in the Active Urban district, cranes could be used for a limited time to affix the floors and other appurtenances. The FAA recognizes that construction of structures normally requires the use of temporary construction equipment that is of a greater height than the proposed structure. Therefore, because future development could exceed 200 feet in height in the Active Urban district, this would be considered a potentially significant impact. Thus, implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-4 would be required for future development that could exceed 200 feet in height, which would require FAA approval to be obtained to ensure that construction and operation of future projects do not present a hazard to air navigation. In addition, due to the fact that buildings within the Active Urban district may exceed 200 feet in height and because of the required City approvals for the Overlay Zone (i.e., General Plan Amendment and Zone change), the City would submit a referral for the Overlay Zone to the ALUC per Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 21676(b) and the AELUP. Coupled with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-4, future development in the Overlay Zone would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Overlay Zone area. It was determined that this impact will be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 575 10/3/2023 Heliports are not proposed within the Overlay Zone. Due to the potential for an increase in residential uses within the Overlay Zone, it is assumed that heliports would be discouraged for future development because of noise and other safety issues. However, should heliports be proposed in the future within the Overlay Zone, such developments would be required to be submitted through the City to the ALUC for review and action (pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 2166.5). While not anticipated, any future heliport projects must comply with the state permit procedure provided by law and with conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the FAA, ALUC for Orange County, and by Caltrans/Division of Aeronautics. As such, this impact was determined to be less than significant Impair Emergency Response Plan The Certified EIR stated that construction of future development in the Overlay Zone could result in short-term temporary impacts on street traffic adjacent to the proposed sites during construction activities due to roadway improvements and potential extension of construction activities into the right-of-way. This could result in a reduction in the number of lanes or temporary closure of certain street segments. Any such impacts would be limited to the construction period and would affect only adjacent streets or intersection. However, Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.6-5 and MM-OZ 4.6-6 would be required to ensure that temporary street closures would not affect emergency access in the vicinity of future developments. Operation of the various residential uses and businesses or facilities developed as part of the Overlay Zone could increase traffic on roads or modify existing transportation routes and could interfere with the response times of emergency vehicles, which would be potentially significant in the case of a hazardous material spill. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-7 would require the City to update their Emergency Preparedness Plan to address changes in the emergency response for accidental release of hazardous materials that may be used, stored, and/or transported at any new facility. Furthermore, the haulers and users of hazardous materials would be required to register with the Santa Ana Fire Department and would be regulated and monitored under the auspices of City. With implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.6-5 through MM-OZ 4.6-7, the Overlay Zone would not interfere with any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans, and this impact was determined to be less than significant. Wildland Fires The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is located in a dense urban environment and is surrounded by existing development. There are no wildland areas, nor wildland interface areas, located in the project vicinity. Consequently, no wildland fires would affect, or be affected by, implementation of the Overlay Zone. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 576 10/3/2023 Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.6-1 For future residential uses that are developed under the Overlay Zone within 500 feet of an existing freeway, a health risk assessment (HRA) for diesel exhaust shall be prepared. Recommendations contained within the HRA shall be implemented in project design. MM-OZ 4.6-2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits on any project site, the site • Investigate the project site to determine whether it or immediately adjacent areas have a record of hazardous material contamination via the preparation of a preliminary environmental site assessment (ESA), which shall be submitted to the City for review. If contamination is found the report shall characterize the site according to the nature and extent of contamination that is present before development activities precede at that site. • If contamination is determined to be on site, the City, in accordance with appropriate regulatory agencies, shall determine the need for further investigation and/or remediation of the soils conditions on the contaminated site. If further investigation or remediation is required, it shall be the responsibility of the site developer(s) to complete such investigation and/or remediation prior to construction of the project. • If remediation is required as identified by the local oversight agency, it shall be accomplished in a manner that reduces risk to below applicable standards and shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy permits. MM-OZ 4.6-3 In the event that previously unknown or unidentified soil and/or groundwater contamination that could present a threat to human health or the environment is encountered during construction of the proposed project, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the contamination shall cease immediately. If contamination is encountered, a Risk Management Plan shall be prepared and implemented that (1) identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk each contaminant would pose to human health and the environment during construction and post -development and (2) describes measures to be taken to protect workers, and the public from exposure to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation, long-term monitoring, post -development maintenance or access limitations, or some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of contamination, if any, appropriate agencies shall be notified (e.g., City of Santa Ana Fire Department). If needed, a Site Health and Safety Plan that meets Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements shall be prepared and in place prior to commencement of work in any contaminated area. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 577 10/3/2023 MM-OZ 4.6-4 For development of structures that exceed 200 feet in height above ground level at a development site, Applicants shall file a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the FAA (FAA Form 7460-1). Following the FAA's nautical evaluation of the project, projects must comply with conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the FAA. Subsequent to the FAA MM-OZ 4.6-5 Prior to initiation of construction activities, any development within the Overlay Zone shall have a completed traffic control plan, prepared by the developer, that will be implemented during construction activities. This may include, but is not limited to, the maintenance of at least one unobstructed lane in both directions on surrounding roadways. At any time only a single lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic signal, signal carriers (i.e., flag persons), or other appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions. If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer shall provide appropriate signage indicating alternative routes. MM-OZ 4.6-6 The City Planning Department shall consult with the Santa Ana Police Department and the Santa Ana Fire Department to disclose temporary closures and alternative travel routes in order to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles when construction of future projects would result in temporary land or roadway closures. MM-OZ 4.6-7 The Santa Ana Fire Department, in consultation with other applicable City Departments (e.g., Police), shall update their Emergency Preparedness Plan prior to occupancy of the first project developed under the Overlay Zone, to address potential for accidental release of hazardous materials that may be used, stored, and/or transported in association with operation of project implementation. 4.9.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. As discussed below, the Project would incorporate mitigation measures to minimize impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials would be less than significant, and accordingly, would not result in any new or increased significant impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 578 10/3/2023 Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials/Release of Hazardous Materials/ Handling Near Schools/ Listed Hazardous Materials Site The Project would not introduce any unusual hazardous materials to the area and would be required to adhere to existing regulations to ensure compliance with safety standards related to the use and storage of hazardous materials, and the safety procedures mandated by applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations (RCRA, California Hazardous Waste Control Law, and principles prescribed by the California Department of Health Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Institutes of Health), including those that minimize the risks associated with the exposure of sensitive receptors, including schools. The nearest school to the Project Site is more than one -quarter mile away and the Project Site has not been identified on any of the various regulatory databases as being contaminated from the release of hazardous substances in the soil, including d storage tanks and small -quantity generators of hazardous waste. Further, in compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-2, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) has been prepared for the Project by Weis Environmental, dated January 16, 2022 (refer to Attachment E). The Phase I ESA concluded that no evidence of recognized environmental conditions, controlled recognized environmental conditions, or historical recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Project Site. In any event, the Project will still implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-3, which requires certain actions in the event an unanticipated contamination is discovered. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to the routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials, the accidental release of hazardous materials, or handling of hazardous materials near schools beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. As previously discussed, the Project is greater than 500 feet away from the nearest freeway. Therefore, Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-1, requiring preparation of a HRA for projects within 500 feet of the nearest freeway, does not apply. Airport Hazards The Project Site is not located within the JWA Airport Influence Area, and the Project would not include buildings that reach a height of 200 feet or taller.14 Thus, implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-4 is not required. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to hazardous materials site list beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Impair Emergency Response Plan The Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.6-5 through MM-OZ 4.6-7 to ensure that the Project would not interfere with any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to emergency response beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. 14 Orange County Airport Land Use Commission, Airport Influence Area for John Wayne Airport, available at https://files. ocair. com/medial2021- 021jwanotf2008. pdf?Versionid=7s4A26J9sMzn02SK2kO3c9kcnvA T8f9s. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 579 10/3/2023 Wildland Fires The Project Site is located in a dense urban environment and is surrounded by existing development. Further the Project Site is not located within a designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone or State Responsibility Area where wildfire risk is most acute. There are no wildland areas, nor wildland interface areas, located in the vicinity of the Project Site. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to wildland fires beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Mitigation Measures The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.6-5, MM-OZ 4.6-6, and MM-OZ 4.6- 7 from the Certified EIR. 4.9.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to hazards and hazardous materials have occurred within the vicinity of the Project Site since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.9.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to hazards and hazardous materials that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.9.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.6-1, MM-OZ 4.6-2, MM-OZ 4.6-3, MM-OZ 4.6-5, MM-OZ 4.6-6, and MM-OZ 4.6-7 from the Certified EIR. 4.9.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified impacts to hazards and hazardous materials would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to hazards and hazardous materials do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 580 10/3/2023 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality Impact Issues (and supporting Information Determination Sources) in EIR HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge Less Than requirements or otherwise Significant With substantially degrade surface Mitigation or groundwater quality? (b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with Less Than groundwater recharge such Significant that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? (c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: Less Than (i) Result in substantial erosion or Significant With siltation on- or off -site? Mitigation (ii)Substantially increase the rate Less Than or amount of surface runoff in a Significant With manner which would result in Mitigation flooding on- or off -site? (iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the Less Than capacity of existing or planned Significant With stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional Mitigation sources of polluted runoff? (iv) Impede or redirect flood No Impact flows? (d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of No Impact pollutants due to project inundation? (e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water Less Than quality control plan or Significant sustainable groundwater management plan? Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Any New Project Substantially or Substantially Information of Incorporates More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 581 10/3/2023 4.10.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Water Quality The Certified EIR concluded that construction activities in the Overlay Zone could include road improvements and realignments, installation and realignment of utilities, demolition of existing structures for new development or replacement and new development. Areas that disturb one or more acres of land surface are subject to the Construction General Permit, 99-08-DWQ adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Stormwater Activity Permit. Compliance with the permit would involve filing a Notice of Intent with the SWRCB and preparing and submitting a SWPPP prior to construction activities. The SWPPP must describe the site, the facility, erosion and sediment controls, runoff water quality monitoring, means of waste disposal, implementation of approved local plans, control of construction sediment and erosion control measures, maintenance responsibilities, and non-stormwater management controls. Inspection of construction sites before and after storms is required to identify stormwater discharge from the construction activity and to identify and implement controls where necessary. The Construction General Permit requirements would need to be satisfied prior to beginning construction on any project located on a site greater than one acre. Water quality degradation from construction would be specific to each site within the Overlay Zone and depend largely on the areas affected and the length of time soils are subject to erosion and construction activities on site. All development would be subject to regional and local regulations, including the City's Water Pollution Ordinance, adopted to ensure compliance with federal requirements for the control of urban pollutants to stormwater runoff which enters the network of storm drains throughout the County of Orange. Contractors constructing new development or redevelopment projects are required to comply with the conditions of the City's Local Implementation Plan (LIP) and the Orange County Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP), including the implementation of appropriate best management practices (BMPs) to control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality. In order to ensure compliance with existing regulations, implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1 would be required for future development projects in the Overlay Zone. Compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1 and applicable permit requirements for construction conditions will ensure that construction water quality effects for future development in the Overlay Zone will be reduced to the maximum extent practicable and will be considered less than significant. Operation of future developments in the Overlay Zone could result in the addition of contaminants into the stormwater runoff entering the City's drainage system. The major source of pollution to runoff and infiltrating groundwater would be contaminants that have accumulated on the land surface over which stormwater passes. Between rainstorms, material would be deposited on the streets, paved areas, roof tops, and other surfaces from debris dropped or scattered by Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 582 10/3/2023 individuals, wastes and dirt from construction and renovation or demolition, fecal droppings from animals, oil and various residues contributed by vehicular traffic, and fallout of air -borne particles. Discretionary projects would require the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). A WQMP would be specific to the expected pollutants that would be present in the stormwater flow from project sites after completion of construction. The WQMP would incorporate the requirements of DAMP Section 7, including all feasible recommended BMPs. It would include site design, source control, and treatment control BMPs to address the specific pollutants anticipated from the project and project site and would detail the specific operation and maintenance of each BMP. The WQMP would outline a routine maintenance schedule for each BMP, in compliance with the DAMP and local regulations. In addition, as discussed previously, developments within the City would be subject to the provisions of the City's Water Pollution Ordinance. Further, as is required for construction activities, operation of new development or redevelopment projects are required to comply with provisions set forth the City's LIP and the DAMP, including the implementation of appropriate BMPs to control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality. Compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1, NPDES permits requirements, the DAMP, and the City's LIP and Municipal Code would reduce the risk of water degradation within the Overlay Zone from the operation of new developments to the maximum extent practicable. Therefore, since violation of waste discharge requirements or water quality standards would be minimized, this impact was determined to be less than significant. Groundwater Recharge/Conflict with Groundwater Management Plan The Certified EIR stated that construction activities would primarily occur as part of infill/redevelopment, with the exception of the potential for development on the limited number of vacant sites in the Overlay Zone. According to the City's General Plan, Santa Ana does not serve as the main spreading basin for groundwater recharge. Depending on the groundwater table at particular project sites within the Overlay Zone, pile driving, dewatering, and other construction activities that would encounter groundwater could potentially occur. While the insertion of support and foundation structures in the groundwater may reduce the storage capacity of groundwater, the displaced volume would not be substantial relative to the volume of the Basin. Likewise, while dewatering would remove groundwater, the volume of water removed would not likely be substantial relative to groundwater pumping for water supply. Also, water used during construction for cleaning, dust control, and other uses would be nominal. Thus, construction activities would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies nor interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. This impact was determined to be less than significant. Future development under the Overlay Zone would lead to increases in water consumption, particularly because residential uses typically use more water than commercial and office uses (which characterize the area). However, because the majority of the Overlay Zone area is developed with existing uses, the potential future development would not substantially reduce areas of ground percolation and recharge because the existing uses would simply be replaced Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 583 10/3/2023 with new uses. The City does not serve as the main spreading basin for groundwater recharge. Thus, any development on the limited undeveloped land within the Overlay Zone, groundwater recharge would not substantially affect groundwater recharge. Therefore, because the majority of the Overlay Zone is already developed and because the Overlay Zone area is not used for groundwater recharge, the operation of future development under the Overlay Zone would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. This impact was determined to be less than significant. Erosion/Siltation The Certified EIR stated that construction activities under the Overlay Zone would involve stockpiling, grading, excavation, paving, and other earth -disturbing activities, which could result in the alteration of existing drainage patterns. These types of activities would constitute a temporary alteration of drainage patterns. However, future development would be required to comply with the DAMP and the City's corresponding LIP, which serves as the primary policy and implementation document for compliance with the NPDES Stormwater permits. Compliance with NPDES regulations and the City's Municipal Code would reduce the risk of short-term erosion resulting from drainage alteration during construction to a less -than -significant impact. The majority of the Overlay Zone is developed with office and commercial uses. The introduction of new uses throughout the Overlay Zone is not anticipated to result in substantial changes to the existing drainage patterns because existing drainage facilities would continue to be used and the amount of drainage would remain similar to present levels. However, it is possible that future development in the Overlay Zone could result in minor alterations to drainage, such as changes in ground surface permeability via paving, or changes in topography via grading and excavation. The above discusses applicable regulations that would limit pollutant discharges from future development in the Overlay Zone. In addition, all development in the Overlay Zone would be subject to the provisions of the City's LIP and Orange County DAMP. These regulations include the implementation of appropriate BMPs including a range of methods that could minimize off - site erosion, including but not limited to hydrodynamic devices, swales/biofilters, basins, and various filters. In addition, as required by Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1, future developments would be required to prepare a storm drain plan and WQMP. Implementation of these plans would reduce the volume of sediment -laden runoff discharging from sites within the Overlay Zone. Consequently, because future projects in the Overlay Zone are not anticipated to substantially alter drainage patterns in comparison to existing conditions in the area, and because adherence to existing requirements would reduce erosion and siltation during operation, this impact was determined to be less than significant. Onsite and Offsite Flooding/Contribution of Runoff The Certified EIR stated that future development in the Overlay Zone would generally result in infill development or redevelopment. As such, most of the future projects would not result in new Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 584 10/3/2023 development that would substantially alter drainage patterns because these areas are already developed with existing uses and impervious surfaces. However, limited development of land that is currently vacant (i.e., agricultural parcels) and covered with permeable surfaces may occur. Although minimal, increased impervious surfaces would increase stormwater runoff in the Overlay Zone. In addition, it is unknown whether the existing drainage system throughout the Overlay Zone is adequate. Therefore, in order to provide a conservative assessment, it is possible that this increased runoff could exceed the capacity of existing and planned infrastructure and cause downstream flooding impacts. The Certified EIR stated that adherence to Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1 would require the preparation of a WQMP and implementation of appropriate BMPs, which could incorporate stormwater detention facilities, and would reduce the volume of runoff generated (and potential for flooding) in the Overlay Zone. However, because the existing capacity of the existing storm drain system in the Overlay Zone is unknown, it was determined that this impact could be potentially significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-2 is required to address these issues. Impede/Redirect Flood Flows The Certified EIR stated the Overlay Zone is not within the 100-year flood hazard area and is outside the 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain. As there would be no risk of flooding in the Overlay Zone, there would be no impact to the placement of structures which would impede or redirect flood flows, and no impacts will occur. Tsunami/Seiche Water Quality Hazards The Certified EIR stated Overlay Zone is located approximately 9 miles from the Pacific Ocean and 130 feet above sea level, which is a sufficient distance so as not to be subject to tsunami impacts. No impact associated with tsunamis is anticipated to occur. The closest enclosed bodies of water that could result in earthquake -induced seiches are the Prado Dam, which is located near the City of Corona to the northwest of the Cleveland National Forest, or the Santiago Dam, which is located approximately 12 miles east of the area in Silverado. The project site is not located within a flood hazard (inundation) area associated with either dam. Therefore, overflow as the result of a seiche would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by seiche within the Overlay Zone. The City is located on nearly flat surfaces and there are no areas with slopes significant enough to cause mudflows near the Overlay Zone which would expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death. Therefore, no impact associated with mudflows is anticipated to occur. In summary, it was determined that there will be no impact to the exposure of people or structures at the Overlay Zone to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.7-1 In order to comply with the 2003 DAMP, future development projects in the Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 585 10/3/2023 Overlay Zone shall prepare Storm Drain Plans, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) conforming to the current National Pollution System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or Environmental Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. • A SWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements of each phase of the development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the project is completed. The SWPPP shall include treatment and disposal of all dewatering operation flows, and for nuisance flows during construction. • A WQMP shall be prepared, maintained, and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program. The plan shall incorporate water quality measures for all improved phases of the project. • Location of the BMPs shall not be within the public right-of-way. MM-OZ 4.7-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, future development projects in the Overlay Zone shall submit a Hydrology and Hydraulic Study to the Public Works Department for review and approval. If existing facilities are not adequate to handle runoff that may be generated by the proposed development, then the applicant shall propose feasible remedies to assure that adequate be available prior to issuance of occupancy permits. The applicant may propose storm drain improvements to be constructed in order to meet project needs. If necessary, storm drain upgrades cannot be implemented prior to issuance of occupancy permits, on site detention facilities or other methods acceptable to the City shall be included with new development projects to ensure that post -construction runoff does not exceed pre -development quantities. 4.10.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. As discussed below, the Project would incorporate mitigation measures to minimize impacts related to hydrology and water quality Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 586 10/3/2023 would be less than significant, and accordingly, would not result in any new or increased significant impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Water Quality The Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1, which requires preparation and implementation of a SWPP that would incorporate BMPs and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the Project is complete. Additional Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1 requires the preparation and maintenance of a WQMP in compliance with the adopted NPDES program. The WQMP would incorporate water quality measures for all phases of the Project. Further, the Project would be subject to the provisions of the City's Water Pollution Ordinance and provisions set forth the City's LIP and the DAMP. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to water quality beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Groundwater Recharge/ Conflict with Groundwater Management Plan The Project Site is currently developed with impervious surfaces and is not a source of groundwater recharge. The Project would not change this. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to water quality beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Erosion/Siltation The Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1, which requires preparation of a WQMP in compliance with NPDES regulations, the DAMP, and the City's Municipal Code and would reduce the risk of erosion. These regulations include the implementation of appropriate BMPs including a range of methods that could minimize off -site erosion, including but not limited to hydrodynamic devices, swales/biofilters, basins, and various filters. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to erosion and siltation beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Onsite and Offsite Flooding/ Contribution of Runoff As previously discussed, the Project would incorporate Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1, which requires the preparation of a WQMP and implementation of appropriate BMPs, which could incorporate stormwater detention facilities and would reduce the volume of runoff generated (and potential for flooding). However, to conservatively confirm no potential impacts, the Project would also incorporate Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-2, which requires preparation of a Hydrology and Hydraulic Study to ensure the existing storm drain capacity could accommodate the Project and that the Project would not result in on- or off -site flooding. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to on- or off -site flooding beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 587 10/3/2023 Impede/Redirect Flood Flows The Project Site is still not located in a flood hazard area and would not impede or redirect flood flows. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to impeding or redirecting flood flows beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Tsunami/Seiche Water Quality Hazards The Project Site is still not located in an area that is subject to tsunami/seiche/mudflow hazards. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to water quality hazards beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. 4.10.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to hydrology and water quality have occurred within the vicinity of the Project Site since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.10.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance which has become available relative to hydrology and water quality that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.10.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.7-1 and MM-OZ 4.7-2 from the Certified EIR. 4.10.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant hydrologic/water quality impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified hydrologic/water quality impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts on hydrology and water quality do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 588 10/3/2023 4.11 Land Use and Planning Issues (and supporting Information Sources) Any Substantial Changes Involving New Significant Impact Impacts or Determination Substantially More in EIR Severe Impacts? Any Substantially Changed Circumstances Involving New Significant Impact or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Information of Substantial Importance? Project Incorporates Mitigation Measure(s)? LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: (a) Physically divide an established Less Than No No No No community? Significant (b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy or Less Than No No No No regulation adopted for the Significant purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 4.11.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Land Use Conflicts The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone would allow for introduction of residential, commercial, and entertainment uses in a largely office -oriented district. The transition of the area from a predominantly office -oriented area to a mixed -use center would occur over time as individual properties are developed under the Overlay Zone standards and guidelines. Land use incompatibility can occur where differences exist among uses that are near each other. These incompatibilities may result from differences in the physical scale of development, noise levels, traffic levels, hours of operation, and other factors. The potential for conflicts exists in particular where mixed -use development occurs. The Overlay Zone adds new mixed -use designations to an area that is designated primarily as Professional and Commercial uses. Mixed - use development would be permissible within the Neighborhood Transitional, Village Center, and Active Urban districts, such that residential uses could be placed in proximity to commercial, office, and entertainment uses, including those in a highly urbanized environment. Development standards contained in the Overlay Zone provide guidance that would minimize conflicts among uses in mixed -use facilities. Principles to minimize conflicts include: 1.2 Objectives • Achieve the harmonious integration of new mixed -use development within the existing fabric of the mid -rise and high-rise environment Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 589 10/3/2023 4.2 Development Intensity (FAR) • The overall scale and massing of development within the Overlay Zone should transition from 2 story scale of the Neighborhood Transitional district to mid -rise development in the Village Center district and high-rises in the Active Urban district adjacent to the Santa Ana Freeway. o New development in the Neighborhood Transitional district shall be of a low scale and should serve as a visual transition between the Village Center and adjacent residential areas to the north. o New develop shall be compatible in height, scale, and mass with adjacent residential development to the north, with heights ranging between two and three stories. o New development in the Village Center district is more intensive in scale than the Neighborhood Transitional district and shall serve as a visual transition from the low -intensity development of the Neighborhood Transitional district to the high - intensive development in the Active Urban district. o New development shall relate in similarity of scale, height, and configuration with adjacent buildings. o New development shall be designed and oriented to promote intensive public activity at the ground level that integrates and establishes a cohesive transition with adjacent districts. Project -specific features would depend on the types of uses proposed and the specific design of individual projects. Examples of design elements to reduce conflicts include screening of mechanical equipment, and locating these uses away from residential components; specific locations and hours of operation for service deliveries; and separate vehicular entrances for residential and commercial uses. Implementation of Development Standards therefore ensure that design of mixed use development does not result in significant land use incompatibilities. In many locations, the addition of uses similar to existing uses would occur. For instance, in the Office District, uses would continue as currently permitted, and additional offices could be built in the Neighborhood Transitional district. Where additional development that is the same as or similar to existing development could occur, these uses would be compatible. Neighborhood Transitional: Existing land uses in the Neighborhood Transitional district consist of one- and two-story office buildings. Land uses that would be permitted within this district under Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 590 10/3/2023 the Overlay Zone would be limited to residential, live/work, or office uses, limited to three stories in height. The Neighborhood Transitional district would remain as a low -intensity neighborhood as it is intended in the General Plan, and act as a transition between the single-family residential to the north and adjacent Village Center district and high -intensity Active Urban district to the south. The Neighborhood Transitional district development will be designed to provide an appropriate interface with the adjacent single-family residential area to the north by incorporating high levels of landscaping and design features. Village Center. Existing land uses in the Village Center district consist of office buildings one to four stories in height, and minor retail, auto -related retail, and motel uses. Land uses that would be permitted within this District under the Overlay Zone include commercial, office, and residential uses. The area would remain as a mid -rise building environment with heights between four and six stories. The Village Center is intended to serve as the focal point and central gathering place within the Overlay Zone, with an emphasis on creating a vibrant, attractive, and highly - interconnected pedestrian environment. The Village Center will provide open spaces, niches, and areas for gatherings and activities along streets, paseos, and interconnecting walkways that link the Village Center to adjacent districts and nearby public parks north of the district. Active Urban: Existing development in the Active Urban district includes primarily office, with minor retail/commercial, auto -related retail, and a motel and care/rehab facility. Land uses that would be permitted within this district under the Overlay Zone include commercial, office, residential, and entertainment uses (all uses that would occur in Village Center, plus entertainment uses). Pursuant to the General Plan, the Active Urban district is intended as the location for well -designed high-rise mixed -use developments in a highly urbanized environment. Developments will be designed to showcase an amenity -enhanced environment that provides numerous open space opportunities for the enjoyment of residents, employees, and visitors, and to promote pedestrian connections between this District and the Village Center as well as Cabrillo Park located north of the Overlay Zone. The Office District: Existing development in the Office District consists almost entirely of office uses, with minor retail/commercial, and a care/rehab facility. Land uses and intensity standards that would be permitted within this district under the Overlay Zone would continue pursuant to the existing Zoning Code. Provided that the above objectives and development standards are implemented into the design of individual projects, land use impacts to the Office District and adjacent communities would be less than significant. The land use character of the area would change from a largely office - oriented district to a mixed -use area with development divided into a series of districts and scaled in a variety of intensities. Because the Overlay Zone would not adversely affect existing land uses, impacts to established communities within and adjacent to the Overlay Zone were determined to be less than significant. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 591 10/3/2023 Physically Divide an Established Community The Certified EIR stated the Overlay Zone does not include any features that would be considered divisive. Rather, the Development Standards of the Overlay Zone are intended to allow cohesive development. The required public realm improvements would enhance and unify the existing with the new development and create linkages to adjacent communities through pedestrian amenities and an integrated and interconnected open space and landscaping network. Existing uses would continue to be permitted within the Overlay Zone and be subject to the regulations and development standards of the underlying zoning districts, with the exception that certain standards contained in the Overlay Zone as to public realm improvements would be required. Because the Overlay Zone would encourage connectivity, impacts to established communities within and adjacent to the Overlay Zone would be less than significant. Plan Consistency The Certified EIR stated that the City's General Plan Land Use Element designates the entire Overlay Zone within the Professional and Administrative (PAO) land use category. The General Plan identifies the following uses as types of uses typically located in the PAO district: • Professional and administrative offices/office parks; • Service activities such as copy centers, courier services, travel agencies, and restaurants when such uses are an integral component of a planned office development; and • Professional uses such as accountants, attorneys, doctors, engineers, and insurance brokers. The Land Use Element also prescribes a floor area ratio (FAR) intensity standard from 0.5 to 1.0 FAR for the PAO land use category. Adoption of the Overlay Zone would conflict with the adopted General Plan by permitting additional uses including commercial, residential, and entertainment uses. The Santa Ana General Plan will be amended as part of the approval process of the Overlay Zone to include the Overlay Zone. Therefore, impacts of the Overlay Zone would be less than significant. Development within the Overlay Zone would consist of development ranging in intensity from AR, exceeding the General Plan recommended FAR threshold of 1.0; however, the proposed intensity standards by district generally reflect the intent of the General Plan. The General Plan prescribes an FAR of 0.5 for those areas adjacent to low -density residential neighborhoods. The Neighborhood Transitional District in the Overlay Zone contains an intensity standard ranging from 0.5 to 0.75. The General Plan also designates the area south of Fourth Street as a "major development area" with high -intensity and high -quality regional office projects. The Active Urban District and the Office District of the Overlay Zone are located within this area. The existing high- rise Xerox Center (SD 54) within the proposed Office District is an example of development appropriate for the "major development area". It has an FAR of over 3. While the FAR allowance in the Overlay Zone exceeds the range prescribed in the General Plan, the Santa Ana General Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 592 10/3/2023 Plan will be amended as part of approval of the Overlay Zone to reflect the Overlay Zone intensity standards. Therefore, impacts of the Overlay Zone would be less than significant. Under the City's existing zoning, there are six land use zones within the Overlay Zone. The provisions of the Overlay Zone would apply to all properties within the Overlay Zone but would not supersede the underlying zoning districts. All regulations, development standards, and requirements in the underlying zoning districts would continue to apply to those properties that are developed according to the existing standards, with the exception that certain standards contained in the Overlay Zone as to public realm improvements would be required. Properties within the Overlay Zone may choose to develop to the standards contained within the Overlay Zone as an alternative to developing to the standards of the underlying zoning districts. Therefore, adoption of the Overlay Zone would be complementary to, and compatible with the existing Zoning Code. Mitigation Measures None identified or required. 4.11.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project is consistent with the permitted uses, density and intensity, building envelope and development standards contained in the Overlay Zone and evaluated in the Certified EIR. The Project will pay in -lieu fees required by the City's 2021 Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance. Thus, no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project that were not considered in the Certified. EIR.. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant land use impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. 4.11.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to land use and planning have occurred within the vicinity of the Project Site since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 593 10/3/2023 4.11.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance which has become available relative to land use that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.11.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts None required. 4.11.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant land use impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified land use impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to land use do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 594 10/3/2023 4.12 Mineral Resources Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Substantially or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Information Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: (a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region No Impact No No No No and the residents of the state? (b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource No Impact No No No No recovery site delineated on local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 4.12.1 Impact Determination in the EIR The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone would not result in any impacts related to mineral resources. Mitigation Measures None required. 4.12.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to mineral resources beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 595 10/3/2023 4.12.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to mineral resources have occurred within the vicinity of the Project Site since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.12.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance which has become available relative to mineral resources that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.12.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts Because the EIR determined the Project would have no impact on mineral resources, no mitigation measures were required. Implementation of the Project does not change these impact determinations. Therefore, no additional mitigation measures are required. 4.12.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant mineral resources or a substantial increase in previously identified mineral resources would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to mineral resources do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 596 10/3/2023 4.13 Noise Issues (and supporting Information Sources) Impact Determination in EIR Any Substantial Changes Involving New Significant Impacts or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any Substantially Changed Circumstances Involving New Significant Impact or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Information of Substantial Importance? Project Incorporates Mitigation Measure(s)? NOISE: Would the project result in: (a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of Significant and No No No Yes standards established in the Unavoidable local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (b) Generation of excessive Significant and groundborne vibration or Unavoidable No No No Yes groundborne noise levels? (c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public No Impact No No No No airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 4.13.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Substantial Temporary or Permanent Increase In Noise The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone has the potential to result in events that may exceed permitted noise levels. The primary sources of noise associated with the Overlay Zone would be construction activities and project -related traffic volumes. Secondary sources include increased human activity throughout the sites. Noise limits for sensitive uses established in Section 18-311 and 18-312 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Development of projects under the Overlay Zone would require the use of heavy equipment for demolition, site excavation, installation of utilities, site grading, paving, and building fabrication. Construction activities would also involve the use of smaller power tools, generators, and other sources of noise. During each stage of construction there would be a different mix of equipment operating, and noise levels would vary based on the amount of equipment in operation and the location of the activity. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 597 10/3/2023 Noise that would be experienced by sensitive uses due to development associated with implementation of the Overlay Zone is determined at their property lines. While the nearest sensitive uses vary at different locations in and around the Overlay Zone and as specific development plans have not yet been determined at individual sites, for the purpose of this analysis it is assumed that sensitive receptors could be as close as 50 feet from where construction would take place. Sensitive receptors in the project vicinity could experience noise levels up to 86 dBA L as a result of construction activities, or as high as 107 dBA Leq in the event that pile drivers are used. Section 18-314(e) of the Municipal Code allows for noise resulting from construction activities to be exempt from noise limits established in the Code. In accordance with the Noise Ordinance, construction activities would also be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Monday through Saturday, and is prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. As construction would not occur except during the times permitted in the Noise Ordinance, and as the Municipal Code, Section 18-314(e) of the Municipal Code allows construction noise in excess of standards to occur between these hours, the Overlay Zone would not violate established standards. Development within the Overlay Zone would be required to implement Mitigation Measures MM- OZ 4.9-1 through MM-OZ 4.9-4. Implementation of these mitigation measures would ensure that impacts associated with construction -related noise would be less than significant. Operation of the Overlay Zone could expose noise -sensitive land uses to noise levels that exceed the standards established by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. This is considered a potentially significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-5 through MM-OZ 4.9-7 would reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level. Sources of noise generated by implementation of the Overlay Zone would include new stationary sources (such as rooftop heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] systems for the residential and office uses). The Overlay Zone would also introduce new activity and noise to the area as residences are included and people are attracted to the new mix of uses that would develop as part of the Overlay Zone. Noise monitoring on the project site indicates that existing noise levels on site exceed the 65 dBA "desirable maximum" noise standard for high density residential uses. Development of new residences in areas where existing noise levels are over 65 dBA would constitute a significant impact. As the noise levels monitored on -site exceed the 65 dBA thresholds, the project site would not meet acceptable noise levels for a residential use. It should be noted that some monitoring locations such as First Street between Cabrillo Park Drive and Golden Circle Drive are primarily commercial corridors hat typically do not qualify as sensitive receptors. Further, impacts related to substantial permanent increases in ambient noise levels that could potentially result with implementation of the Overlay Zone are discussed below. The City of Santa Ana General Plan states that all residential uses should be protected with sound insulation over and above that provided by normal building construction when constructed in areas exposed to greater than 60 dBA CNEL. As such, Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-5 and MM-OZ 4.9-6 shall be implemented for all residential development within the Overlay Zone Area Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 598 10/3/2023 where the existing noise levels exceed the 60 dBA CNEL standard established in the General Plan. Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.9-5 would ensure that exterior living spaces, such as porches and patios are constructed in a manner that noise levels do not exceed the 65 dBA CNEL. Further implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.9-6 would ensure that interior living spaces of the residential units do not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. Therefore, this impact would be reduced to a level of less than significant. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems that would be installed for the new residential building associated with the Overlay Zone can result in noise levels that average between 50 and 65 dBA Leq at 50 feet from the equipment. As 24-hour CNEL noise levels are about 6.7 dBA greater than 24-hour Leq measurements, this means that the HVAC equipment associated with the retail -commercial buildings could generate community noise levels that average between 57 to 72 dBA CNEL at 50 feet when the equipment is operating constantly over 24 hours. These HVAC units would be mounted on the rooftops of the proposed buildings and would be screened from view by building features. However, the installation of shielding around these HVAC systems would be required as part of the Overlay Zone, as stated in Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.9-7 below. The shielding installed around these systems would typically reduce noise levels by approximately 15 dBA, which could reduce HVAC system noise to approximately 50 dBA Leq at 50 feet from the equipment, which would be approximately 56.7 dBA CNEL. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.9-1 would ensure that impacts related to the HVAC systems would remain below the 65 dBA CNEL "Desirable Maximum" exterior noise level guideline established in the City's General Plan for high density residential uses. As such impacts to residents of the Overlay Zone relating to HVAC systems were determined to be less than significant. Operation of the Overlay Zone would not include special events or temporary activities which would cause an increase in ambient noise levels. In addition, operation of the Overlay Zone would not require periodic use of special stationary equipment that would expose off -site sensitive receptors to an increase in ambient noise levels above those existing without the Overlay Zone. Therefore, there would be no temporary or periodic noise impacts to on- or off -site receptors due to operation of the Overlay Zone. This impact was determined to be less than significant. Groundborne Vibration The Certified EIR stated that construction -related vibration has two potential impacts. First, vibration at high enough levels can result in human annoyance. Second, groundborne vibration can potentially damage the foundations and exteriors of historic structures. Groundborne vibration that can cause this kind of damage is typically limited to impact equipment, especially pile drivers. Construction activities that would occur under the Overlay Zone have the potential to generate low levels of groundborne vibration. Vibration that would be experienced from the use of construction equipment ranges from a small bulldozer, which reaches as high as 58 vibration decibels (VdB) at a distance of 25 fee, and an impact pile -drivers, which reaches as high as 112 Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 599 10/3/2023 VdB at a distance of 25 feet. Like noise, groundborne vibration will attenuate at a rate of approximately 6 VdB per doubling of distance. The groundborne vibration generated during construction activities would primarily impact existing sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, and hospitals) that are located adjacent to, or within, the vicinity of specific projects. These sensitive uses could sometimes be located as close as 25 feet to the construction site or as far as several hundred feet away. Vibration levels could reach up to 87 VdB at sensitive uses located within 25 feet of construction. For sensitive uses that are located at or within 25 feet of potential project construction sites, sensitive receptors (e.g., residents, school children, and hospital patients) at these locations may experience vibration levels during construction activities that exceed the Federal Transportation Administration's (FTA) vibration impact threshold of 85 VdB for human annoyance. So long as construction occurs more than 50 feet from sensitive receptors, the impact associated with groundborne vibration generated by the equipment would be below 85 VdB and thus would be less than significant. However, as specific site plans or constructions schedules are unknown at this time, it may be possible that construction activities could occur as close as 25 feet from sensitive receptors. This would result in these sensitive receptors experiencing vibration impacts above the threshold of 85 VdB, in which case this impact would be potentially significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-1 through MM-OZ 4.9-4 would help to reduce this impact, but not to a less -than -significant level. Therefore, it was determined that this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. During operation of the Overlay Zone, background operational vibration levels would be expected to average around 50 VdB, as discussed previously in this section. This is substantially less than the 85 VdB threshold for people in the vicinity of the project site. Groundborne vibration resulting from operation of the Overlay Zone would primarily be generated by trucks making periodic deliveries to the Overlay Zone. However, these types of deliveries would be consistent with deliveries that are made along roadways to commercial uses in the Overlay Zone and in the Overlay Zone vicinity and would not increase groundborne vibration above existing levels. Because no substantial sources of groundborne vibration would be built as part of the Overlay Zone, no vibration impacts would occur during operation of the Overlay Zone. Therefore, operation of the Overlay Zone would not expose sensitive receptors on or off site to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and this impact was determined to be less than significant. Airport Noise The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2.0 miles of a public airport or public use airport. The nearest public airport to the project is the John Wayne Airport, which is located approximately 6.5 miles southwest of the Overlay Zone. Further, the Overlay Zone is located over 5,000 feet from the 60 CNEL noise contour for John Wayne Airport. Thus, no impact related to the exposure of people residing or working in the project site to excessive airport -related noise levels is anticipated. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 600 10/3/2023 Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-1 Construction activities shall be limited to the following general restrictions. In the event that there is a conflict between the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code and the City of Tustin Municipal Code, the more restrictive measures shall be applied: • All construction activity within the City shall be conducted in accordance with Section 18- 314(e) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. • All construction activity within 200 feet of the City of Tustin Border shall be conducted in accordance with Section 4617(e) of the City of Tustin Municipal Code. MM-OZ 4.9-2 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that the following construction best management practices (BMPs) be implemented by contractors to reduce construction noise levels: • Two weeks prior to the commencement of construction, notification must be provided to surrounding land uses within 1,000 feet of a project site disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period • Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffled according to industry standards and be in good working condition • Place noise -generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses, where feasible • Schedule high noise -producing activities between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to minimize disruption on sensitive uses • Implement noise attenuation measures, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources • Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible • Construction -related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes • Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent. If the City or the job superintendent receives a complaint, the superintendent shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action taken to the reporting party. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 601 10/3/2023 • Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM-OZ 4.9-3 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that construction staging areas along with the operation of earthmoving equipment within the project area would be located as far away from vibration and noise -sensitive sites as possible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM-OZ 4.9-4 The project applicant shall require by contract specifications that heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away from residential streets. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM-OZ 4.9-5 Where future residential uses would be construction in areas exposed to noise level greater than 60 dBA CNEL, prior to issuance of building permits, building plans shall reflect the construction of noise barriers around patios and balconies. The barriers shall be constructed of materials that provide a surface density of at least four pounds per square foot and shall be continuous, without gaps or gates. The height of the barriers shall be sufficient to reduce the exterior noise levels to a CNEL of 65 dBA or less, and shall be determined by a qualified acoustical consultant as part of the final engineering design of the project MM-OZ 4.9-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, building plans shall specify the STC rating of windows and doors for all residential land uses. Window and door ratings shall be sufficient to reduce the interior noise level to a CNEL of 45 dBA or less, and shall be determined by a qualified acoustical consultant as part of the final engineering design of the project MM-OZ 4.9-7 The developer shall provide proper shielding for all new HVAC systems used by the proposed residential and mixed -use buildings to achieve an attenuation of 15 dBA at 50 feet from the equipment. 4.13.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 602 10/3/2023 that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. As discussed below, the Project would incorporate mitigation measures to minimize impacts related to noise and vibration would be less than significant, and accordingly, would not result in any new or increased significant impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. The types of construction activities, operational activities, and construction and mechanical equipment and associated construction and operational noise and vibration levels would be substantially similar to those identified in the Certified EIR. The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-1 through MM-OZ 4.9-7 to protect residential receptors and to minimize construction and operational noise and vibration levels. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to substantial temporary or permanent increase in noise and vibration beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Further, a Project -specific noise analysis was prepared by DKA Planning (refer to Attachment F). in June 2023, DKA Planning took short-term noise measurements near the Project site to determine the current ambient noise conditions near the four nearest sensitive receptors: Cabrillo Park, 2001 E. 4th Street, the southeast corner of 4th Street and Cabrillo Park Drive, and 618 Sherry Lane. Regarding construction, the Project would comply with Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 18-314 and construction activities would be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Monday through Saturday, and would be prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. Table 7 of the DKA Noise Report demonstrates that construction of the Project would not increase ambient noise levels at any nearby sensitive receptor by more than 3.4 dBA and therefore would not result in significant noise impacts to those receptors, including Cabrillo Park directly north of the Project Site and 724 North Parkcenter Drive, the closest residence, located 80 feet northeast of the Project Site within the Lake Dianne Apartment complex. Regarding operation, Table 9 of the DKA Noise Report demonstrates that Project operation, including noise associated with mechanical and landscaping equipment, vehicles, outdoor and recreational uses, and trash and recycling services, would not increase ambient noise levels at any nearby sensitive receptor and therefore would not result in significant operational noise impacts to those receptors. The Project would also implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-1 through MM-OZ 4.9-7 of the Certified EIR to protect residential receptors and to minimize construction and operational noise and vibration levels. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to substantial temporary or permanent increase in noise and vibration beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Regarding airport noise, the nearest public airport to the project is the John Wayne Airport, which is located approximately 7 miles southwest of the Project Site well beyond the 60 CNEL noise contour for John Wayne Airport. Thus, no impact related to the exposure of people residing or working in the project site to excessive airport -related noise levels is anticipate. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 603 10/3/2023 4.13.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to noise have occurred and no substantial new noise sources have been identified within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.13.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to noise impacts that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.13.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9-1 through MM-OZ 4.9-7 from the Certified EIR. 4.13.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant noise impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified noise impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to noise do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 604 10/3/2023 4.14 Population and Housing Impact Issues (and supporting Determinatio Information Sources) n in EIR POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: (a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Substantially or Substantially More Severe More Severe Impacts? Impacts? Any New Information of Substantial Importance? Project Incorporates Mitigation Measure(s)? Less Than No No No No Significant No Impact No No No No 4.14.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Unplanned Growth The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone would provide for infill development that makes maximum use of existing infrastructure. As the majority of development that would occur under the Overlay Zone would be infill or redevelopment, the development permitted under the Overlay Zone would not require significant regional public infrastructure upgrades for any utility, transportation facility, or public service. However, any new development would be required to include provisions to make the necessary improvements in order to facilitate implementation of the Overlay Zone. Project developers would be required to fund their fair -share allocation of any necessary public infrastructure associated with development under the Overlay Zone. Any infrastructure improvements would occur during a period of regional growth. Due to the fact that net new infrastructure developments would be minimal, it is not anticipated that the infrastructure improvements would result in measurable population growth in or around the Overlay Zone area. As such, the indirect population growth impact resulting from infrastructure improvements associated with the Overlay Zone was determined to be less than significant. Implementation of the Overlay Zone is intended to accommodate existing and future population growth forecasted for the City by introducing new residential housing within the Overlay Zone, as well as new employment opportunities in and around the Overlay Zone area. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 605 10/3/2023 Implementation of the Overlay Zone would enact zoning changes to allow for up to 5,551 multi- family residential units. In order to quantify the direct population increase that would result from new housing in the Overlay Zone, it is necessary to determine an appropriate pph estimate to use. Based on an average person per household size of 2.0 persons per household (pph), the estimated direct population growth associated with the potential 5,551 new residential units in the Overlay Zone would be approximately 11,102 people (5,551 units x 2.0 pph). In addition, the Overlay Zone would allow for a total of 1,275,440 square feet of commercial/retail/service uses and a total of 3,410,507 square feet of office building uses. These development potential totals would represent a net increase of 963,154 square feet of commercial/retail/service uses and a net increase of 690,339 square feet of office uses compared to existing conditions within the Overlay Zone. The net new commercial and office uses in the Overlay Zone could generate an estimated 2,343 additional jobs. A population increase (without the project) of 16,905 residents is projected between 2005 and 2030 for the City, representing an annual average growth rate of 0.2 percent or approximately 676 residents per year. The direct population growth estimated to be associated with the project — approximately 11,102 people, or approximately 65 percent of the projected growth —would not result in growth exceeding this projection but is considered substantial in relation to the level of forecasted population growth. The Overlay Zone was not planned or considered in the land use factors that SCAG or the City used to estimate the population growth forecast for Santa Ana. Therefore, the population growth associated with the project is not accounted for in the population growth projections. When coupled with natural population increases in the City that will result from births and migration, the project -related direct population growth would result in population growth in the City that far exceeds the projected growth. However, in comparison to the average annual growth rate of 0.2 percent projected for the City, the population of Orange County is forecast to grow by an annual average growth rate of 0.6 percent between 2005 and 2030, while the population of the SCAG Region is forecast to grow by an average of 1.1 percent per year during this same 25-year period. Due to the fact that the City's population is forecasted to grow at a slower rate than the County and SCAG Region, the forecasted project -related direct population growth in the City is not considered substantial relative to the surrounding areas. Additionally, although the potential housing units (and associated population increase) were not previously anticipated, the City is relatively built -out and has limited opportunities for additional residential development. Specifically, according to the 2000 Housing Element of the General Plan, there was a potential for only 1,775 residential units to be developed on the City's remaining undeveloped and underutilized properties. Even if all of these units were developed, the population increase that could be accommodated would only range between 3,550 and 8,343 persons (depending on a pph factor of 2.0 or 4.7). Therefore, in order to accommodate the forecasted population growth that is anticipated to continue to occur, infill and reutilization of underdeveloped land has become a priority in the City. In particular, as discussed in the City's Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 606 10/3/2023 2000 Housing Element, the City's intent is to intensify compatible residential development through adaptive reuse and mixed use within the District Center designation and other existing commercial zones. As discussed in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, District Centers are considered to be the City's "Major Development Areas," where the most intense development in the City is targeted. The Overlay Zone is a Major Development Area even though it is not designated as a District Center. SCAG projections indicate an increase of up to 13,394 employees in the City from 2005-2030. The Overlay Zone could generate up to 2,343 employment positions and would not substantially affect the employment forecasts within the City. With an existing (2005) jobs/housing ratio of 2.3 within the City, the new mix of residential and commercial/service and office uses in the Overlay Zone would improve the overall jobs/housing ratio to 2.4. The Overlay Zone new commercial/service and office uses would generate an estimated 2,343 long-term employment positions. Based on similar projects, the distribution of part-time to full- time would be approximately 60 percent (1,405) full-time jobs and 40 percent (937) part-time jobs. Based upon resident worker characteristics for similar cities, it is estimated that approximately 25 percent of the new employees generated by the Overlay Zone, or about 585 workers, could relocate to the City. If it is conservatively assumed that each of these employees forms a single new household in the City (in residential units outside of the Overlay Zone area), these households could add approximately 2,749 additional residents to the City (585 worker households x 4.7 persons per household for areas in the City outside of the Overlay Zone). The direct increase in population of 11,102 people that would be associated with the Overlay Zone residential units and the potential indirect increase in population of 2,749 people associated with the new employment opportunities generated by the Overlay Zone would result in a total population increase of approximately 13,851 people in the City. As noted above, this assumes that none of the new employees would reside in the new residential units within the Overlay Zone area. Based on the population projections, the projected population growth in Santa Ana between 2005 and 2030 is approximately 16,905 persons. The total direct and indirect population growth estimated to be associated with the project —approximately 13,851 people —will not result in growth exceeding this projection but is considered substantial in relation to the level of forecasted population growth. The increased population and housing resulting from new development do not necessarily cause direct adverse physical environmental effects; however, indirect physical environmental effects such as population -driven traffic or air quality impacts could occur. These indirect physical environmental effects associated with population increases are analyzed in the relevant technical sections of this EIR. Although the housing units under the Overlay Zone were not accounted for in the City and SCAG regional growth projections, implementation of the Overlay Zone is consistent with the overall intent of the City's goals to provide adequate housing opportunities to meet its "fair share" of projected housing needs. In essence, implementation of the Overlay Zone would allow the City to Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 607 10/3/2023 accommodate the projected growth increases. Additionally, due to the fact that the City's population is forecasted to grow at a slower rate than the County and SCAG Region, the forecasted project -related direct and indirect population growth in the City is not considered substantial relative to the surrounding areas. As such, this impact was determined to be less than significant. Displace Housing or People The Certified EIR stated the Overlay Zone is developed with commercial and office uses. Because no residential uses are located within the overlay zone boundaries, implementation of the Overlay Zone would not require the demolition of any existing housing and construction of replacement housing would not be necessary. Rather, implementation of the Overlay Zone would permit residential uses in an area that prohibits these uses. Consequently, no impact would occur. Mitigation Measures None required or identified. 4.14.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. Therefore, the Project's housing and population generation would be consistent with that identified in the Certified EIR. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to unplanned growth beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. There is no housing on the Project Site. As such, the Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no impacts related to this issue would occur. 4.14.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to population and housing have occurred within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 608 10/3/2023 4.14.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to population and housing impacts that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.14.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts None required. 4.14.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant population and housing impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified population and housing impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to population and housing do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 609 10/3/2023 4.15 Public Services Impact Issues (and supporting Information Determination Sources) in EIR PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Any Substantial Changes Involving New Significant Impacts or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any Substantially Changed Circumstances Involving New Significant Impact or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Information of Substantial Importance? Project Incorporates Mitigation Measure(s)? (a) Fire protection? Less Than No No No No Significant (b) Police protection? Less Than No No No No Significant Less Than (c) Schools? Significant No No No Yes With Mitigation (d) Parks? Less Than No No No No Significant (e) Other public facilities? Less Than Significant No No No No 4.15.1Impact Determination in the EIR Fire The Certified EIR stated adequate response times and staff are present at both Fire Stations serving the Overlay Zone. The addition of 5,551 residential units and office and commercial uses would increase demands on the Santa Ana Fire Department (SAFD). However, both stations serving the area have response times from 5 to 8 minutes, which the City considers adequate. The additional demands from new development in the area are not expected to decrease response times or require additional staffing. The SAFD notified that they would be able to handle the increased service demands with their current staffing and equipment. Adequate water flow is available with ample water pressure for fire services. SAFD's Guide for the Determination of Fire Flow is used to estimate fire flow demands from new development. Structures that require fire flow over 3,500 gallons per minute are either redesigned to lower the fire flow or to include a fire sprinkler system to reduce fire flow demand. The provision of automatic fire sprinklers would reduce the demand, as well as compliance with the Uniform Fire Code, Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 610 10/3/2023 Uniform Building Code, applicable state codes, National Fire Protection Association Fire Codes, and the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Fire facilities fees would further assist in offsetting incremental increased demands from new development. A fire facilities fee is required as a condition of approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of buildings exceeding two stories in height (excluding parking structures and excluding buildings owned and occupied by agencies of the federal, state or local governments). The SAFD also collects a plan check fee which is a fixed percentage of the building permit fee for review of building plans associated with new commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential units. Additional plan check fees for fire sprinkler, fire alarm, automatic extinguishing systems, and other fire protection systems are based on a fee schedule. SAFD also collects a one-time construction inspection fee for fire inspections. The Fire Department also collects an annual fee in the form of an "occupancy permit" for certain types of business, such as restaurants with large assemblage areas. New development would be required to meet all access, water and fire protection system required under the California Building Code and Fire Code, and the City Municipal Codes. Therefore, impacts on City fire services would be less than significant. Police The Certified EIR stated the nearest Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) station is the SAPD Main Headquarters located at 60 Civic Center Plaza approximately 2 miles from the Overlay Zone per the SAPD. The current officer -to -citizen ratio of 2 to 1,000 is consistent with City goal of between 1.3 to 1.5 officer per 1,000 residents. The Overlay Zone would result in the addition of 11,102 persons to the Overlay Zone at buildout. This would decrease the officer to citizen ratio from 2 to 1.95, which is well above the existing City service goals for police protection. The number of calls from the Overlay Zone in the context of the entire City with a population of about 350,000 residents would not substantially affect the level of police protection and service provided by the SAPD. However, given the magnitude of the population increase at buildout, the addition of the Overlay Zone could affect how the SAPD resources are allocated. Annual fees, collected in proportion to the revenue generated by a project, are collected for ongoing police protection services. All of the fees collected by the City are deposited into the City's General Fund and dispersed to the appropriate departments during the annual budgetary process. Although not necessary to maintain sufficient levels of police service, additional personnel and possibly equipment would ensure no change to the ratio of officers to population. The police department has indicated that the project must comply with the City's Building Security Ordinance and the basic Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles. Also, the individual projects in the Mixed Use zone would be required to prepare mandated security plan, which would require a final Police Department approval. Thus, the Overlay Zone would have less than significant effect on the police services of the City. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 611 10/3/2023 Schools The Certified EIR stated that full build out of residential development under the Overlay Zone could result in an additional 5,551 residential units in the Overlay Zone. With the identified generation rate of 0.284 students per unit, the Overlay Zone would generate approximately 1,576 students in the Tustin Unified School District (TUSD). TUSD is already in excess of its capacity by 89 students. Thus, with the existing schools and no future plans for expansion of TUSD facilities, TUSD will be unable to accommodate the additional 1,576 students. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.11-1 would reduce this potentially significant impact to less -than - significant levels. Parks The Certified EIR stated that implementation of future development within the Overlay Zone would provide a variety of open space/recreational opportunities. New development within the Overlay Zone would be required to include an open space/recreation component that is accessible to the public through the main street -facing facade entry of a project. Common open space amenities could include courtyards, plazas, tennis courts, swimming pools, spas, permanently equipped gym/exercise rooms, or other permanent amenities. Private open space/recreation areas could include balconies, loggias, terraces, or rooftop decks. Publicly accessible open space/recreation areas would be designed to optimize linkages and connections with adjacent properties within the Districts and would be visible and accessible from public rights -of -way to engage the interest of pedestrians and encourage public use. Open space/recreation areas would also encourage active use and pedestrian activity between the public and the private realm. Further, individual projects would be required to make payments of Park Acquisition and Development Fees based on the City's Municipal Code Section 34-200 to Section 34-214. Consequently, the provision of open space within individual developments coupled with the payment of fees as appropriate would ensure that demands on parkland are not exacerbated. Impacts would be less than significant. Libraries The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is served by two libraries, the Santa Ana Public Library and the New hope Branch of the Santa Ana library system. Combined, these libraries have a collection of approximately 301,966 items and an overall size of 49,000 square feet (40,000 square feet main library and 9,000 square feet branch library). No new library facilities or expansions are planned for the immediate future. Using the guidelines identified above, implementation of the Overlay Zone would require approximately 5,551 sf of library space and approximately 22,204 volumes due to an estimated increase of approximately 11,102 persons under full build -out of the Overlay Zone. The City's library system is funded through the general fund and does not have a fee collection system in place to obtain fees from a developer. The tax base afforded by the additional development within the Overlay Zone would contribute to the City's general fund, which is distributed to various City services, including libraries. Therefore, any necessary improvements/modifications to the existing Santa Ana library system would be implemented using the general fund and determined on an as -needed annual basis by the City. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 612 10/3/2023 As such, any increase in the need for library resources would be implemented by the City irrespective of the project, although aided by the additional tax base from development within the Overlay Zone, and impacts were determined to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.11-1 Individual project developers shall pay school impact fees prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. 4.15.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. The Project's demand for fire protection, police protection, school, library and park services would be substantially similar to that identified in the Certified EIR. Additionally, the Project would be required to meet all access, water and fire protection system required under the California Building Code and Fire Code and the City Municipal Code. Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with the City's Building Security Ordinance and the basic CPTED principles. Also, the Project would be required to prepare a mandated security plan, which would require a final Police Department approval. The Project would also implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.11-1 and pay school impact fees to minimize impacts to school services. Finally, the Project would pay taxes that would go into the City's General Fund a portion of which supports library services and would be required to make payments of Park Acquisition and Development Fees based on the City's Municipal Code Section 34-200 to Section 34-214 and to provide open space in accordance with the City's open space requirements. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to public services beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Mitigation Measures The Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.11-1 from the Certified EIR. 4.15.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to public services and recreation have occurred within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 613 10/3/2023 4.15.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to public services and recreation that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.15.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts The Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.11-1 from the Certified EIR. 4.15.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant public services impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified public services impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts on public services do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 614 10/3/2023 4.16 Recreation Issues (and supporting Information Sources) Impact Determination in EIR Do Proposed Changes Involve New Significant Impacts or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Circumstances Involving New Significant Impact or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification? Project Incorporates Mitigation Measure(s)? RECREATION (a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational Less Than No No No No facilities such that substantial Significant physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or Less Than expansion of recreational Significant No No No No facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 4.16.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Increase Use of Parks/Recreational Facilities/Construction/Expansion of Recreational Facilities The Certified EIR stated that implementation of future development within the Overlay Zone would provide a variety of open space/recreational opportunities. New development within the Overlay Zone would be required to include an open space/recreation component that is accessible to the public through the main street- facing fagade entry of a project. Common open space amenities could include courtyards, plazas, tennis courts, swimming pools, spas, permanently equipped gym/exercise rooms, or other permanent amenities. Private open space/recreation areas could include balconies, loggias, terraces, or rooftop decks. Publicly accessible open space/recreation areas would be designed to optimize linkages and connections with adjacent properties within the Districts and would be visible and accessible from public rights -of -way to engage the interest of pedestrians and encourage public use. Open space/recreation areas would also encourage active use and pedestrian activity between the public and the private realm. Further, individual projects would be required to make payments of Park Acquisition and Development Fees based on the City's Municipal Code Section 34-200 to Section 34-214. Consequently, the provision of open space within individual developments coupled with the payment of fees as appropriate would ensure that demands on parkland are not exacerbated. Impacts were determined to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures None required or identified. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 615 10/3/2023 3.15.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. The Project's demand for parks would be substantially similar to that identified in the Certified EIR. Additionally, the Project would be required to make payments of Park Acquisition and Development Fees based on the City's Municipal Code Section 34-200 to Section 34-214 and to provide open space in accordance with the City's open space requirements. The Project would provide a total of 33,572 square feet of private open space and 76,187 square feet of common open space (a total of 109,759 square feet), exceeding the amount required by 58,769 square feet. The Project would also provide 47,810, exceeding the amount required by 8,744 square feet. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to parks beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. 3.15.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to recreation have occurred within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 3.15.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative recreation that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 3.15.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts None required. 3.15.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant recreation impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified public services impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to recreation do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 616 10/3/2023 4.16 Transportation Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Impacts or Significant Impact Any New Project Impact Substantially or Substantially Information of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC: Would the project: (a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, Less Than No No No No including transit, roadway, Significant bicycle and pedestrian facilities? (b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section NA No No No No 15064.3 subdivision (b)? (c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or Less Than dangerous intersections) or Significant No No No No incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than (d) Result in inadequate Significant No No No Yes emergency access? With Mitigation 4.16.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Increase in Traffic/ LOS The Certified EIR stated that the significance of local street segment impacts related to excess vehicle traffic is usually determined on a case -by -case basis because each street segment has unique characteristics. The City has established goals for maintaining LOS D or better on local streets. The ability to determine LOS on a local street is very difficult for several reasons. Most importantly, each street is unique in character. Local streets vary considerably in terms of street width, adjacent land uses, density, presence of schools, day care, senior housing, proximity to other major streets, and other factors. A level of traffic which may be perceived as too much on one street may be acceptable on another. Furthermore, a lane of traffic, carrying the traditional LOS D volume on an arterial street, would be far too much traffic for most residential streets. The City has established LOS guidelines based on average daily traffic (ADT) along particular street segments depending on the street segment type. The maximum roadway capacities, in ADT, are based on the number of lanes and roadway classification. For the Overlay Zone, the LOS for roadway segments is determined by comparing the ADT volumes for each roadway segment to the appropriate LOS D capacity for that roadway classification. When the ADT volume is within the LOS D volume criteria, the roadway segment is operating at an acceptable LOS. The Certified EIR presents the ADT segment analysis for 31 roadway segments in and surrounding the Overlay Zone, both for existing conditions and Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 617 10/3/2023 assuming full buildout of the Overlay Zone. One roadway segment (Cabrillo Park Drive between First Street and Fourth Street) is expected to operate at an unacceptable LOS under the Overlay Zone with the expected traffic levels and secondary arterial roadway configuration. However, this roadway is currently constructed with a raised median and can be considered to be four lanes divided, justifying a higher allowable daily capacity of 33,800. As such, implementation of the Overlay Zone would not be anticipated to increase traffic volumes such that street segment volume capacities are exceeded, and impacts were determined to be less than significant. In evaluating consistency with the Certified EIR traffic analysis, twenty-nine of the 38 intersections analyzed in the study area would remain at LOS D or better under the "Buildout without Project" conditions, while only 19 of the intersections would operate at LOS D or better under the "Buildout with Project" conditions. Traffic impacts created by the Overlay Zone can be evaluated by comparing these scenarios (with and without project conditions). The Overlay Zone will contribute to unacceptable levels of service at eight of the intersections evaluated in the AM peak hour. The impact at these eight intersections is considered significant based on the identified criteria. It is also important to note that two additional intersections (First Street at Newport Avenue and Irvine Boulevard at Newport Avenue) would also operate at unacceptable levels (LOS E). However, based on the City of Tustin's threshold criteria, these intersections would not be considered significant due to the Overlay Zone because the project's contribution is less than 0.03. The Overlay Zone would contribute to unacceptable LOS at 16 of the intersections evaluated in the PM peak hour, which include a majority of the signalized intersections along Fourth Street between the 1-5 Freeway and the SR-55 Freeway. The impact at these intersections is considered significant based on City criteria. Thus, a total of 17 different intersections would be impacted by buildout of the Overlay Zone during either the AM or PM peak hour, or both, which is considered potentially significant. Full buildout of the Overlay Zone is dependent on future individual development projects, of which the exact type and location is presently unknown. As such, the Certified EIR has identified potential improvement measures below that would serve to reduce the impacts at the seventeen affected intersections. As development occurs within the Overlay Zone, the following improvement measures may be implemented as part of future development projects, as required. In addition, an improvement measure is also identified for the First Street at Newport Avenue, which is not an impact but which does operate at an unacceptable LOS due to background traffic growth. However, some of the intersections that would operate at unacceptable LOS are outside of the jurisdiction of the City. As such, the City cannot ensure implementation of these improvements. If these improvements were not implemented, LOS would remain below acceptable levels as a result of implementation of the proposed Overlay Zone. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 618 10/3/2023 Potential Improvement Measures • First Street at Cabrillo Park Drive —The intersection of First Street at Cabrillo Park Drive experiences an acceptable LOS in the AM and PM peak hours. With the addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone the LOS is expected to decline to LOS F in the PM peak hour. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is restriping for a second eastbound left turn lane, by reducing the eastbound through approach to two lanes. This improvement will fully mitigate traffic impacts to LOS C. • First Street at Elk Lane —The intersection of First Street at Elk Lane is operating at LOS D in the PM peak hour. The addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to result in a decline in LOS to LOS F in the PM peak hour. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of a second northbound right turn lane and northbound right turn overlap signal phasing. These improvements will fully mitigate traffic impacts to LOS C. • Fourth Street at SR-55 Southbound Ramps —The intersection of Fourth Street at SR-55 Southbound Ramps currently operates at LOS D or better in the AM and PM peak hours. Background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to result in a decline in LOS to LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of an eastbound free -right turn lane and changing the southbound ramp configuration to two left and two right turn lanes. These improvements fully mitigate impacts to LOS D. • Fourth Street at Tustin Avenue —The intersection of Fourth Street at Tustin Avenue currently experiences an acceptable LOS (LOS C or better) in the AM and PM peak hours. The addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to reduce LOS to LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of a westbound right - turn lane, a second eastbound left -turn lane, and a northbound right -turn lane (to allow conversion of the northbound shared thru-right lane to a through lane). Also, northbound right -turn overlap signal phasing should be installed. These improvements will partially mitigate project impacts to LOS E. As such, if the improvement measures were implemented, this intersection would not be mitigated to a level of less than significant. • Fourth Street at Golden Circle —The intersection of Fourth Street at Golden Circle currently operates at LOS A in both the AM and PM peak hours. Background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to result in a decline in level of service to LOS E in the PM peak hour. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of an eastbound right turn lane, and a change in the southbound lane configuration to provide one left turn lane and one shared through - right turn lane. These improvements will fully mitigate traffic impacts to LOS D. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 619 10/3/2023 • Fourth Street at Cabrillo Park Drive —The intersection of Fourth Street at Cabrillo Park Drive currently experiences an acceptable LOS (LOS C or better) in both the AM and PM peak hours. The addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to reduce LOS to LOS F in the PM peak hour. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of a westbound right turn lane, a northbound right turn lane, and a southbound right turn lane, and restriping to change the lane configuration of the north/south approaches. The northbound and southbound approaches should be controlled by a split phase intersection control and restriped to provide one left, one shared through -left, one through, and one right turn lane. These improvements are expected to fully mitigate impacts to LOS D. • 1-5 Northbound Ramps and Fourth Street —The intersection of the 1-5 northbound ramps and Fourth Street is expected to operate at a poor LOS (LOS F) in the PM peak hour with the addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of a second westbound right turn lane. This improvement will fully mitigate traffic impacts to LOS C. However, as this intersection is outside the jurisdiction of the City of Santa Ana, the City cannot ensure implementation of this improvement. Seventeenth Street at Cabrillo Park Drive —The intersection of 17th Street at Cabrillo Park Drive currently has a good LOS in both the AM and PM peak hours (LOS B or better). With the addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone LOS is expected to decline to LOS E in the PM peak hour. The recommended mitigation to address impacts at this intersection is the restriping of the northbound lane configuration to one left, one shared left -through, and one right turn lane, with split signal phasing. These improvements are expected to fully mitigate traffic impacts at this intersection to LOS D. Seventeenth Street at Tustin Avenue —The intersection of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue currently operates at Level of Service C or better in the AM and PM peak hours. Level of service is expected to decline to LOS E in the AM peak hour due to growth in background traffic and traffic from the Overlay Zone. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of a third northbound through/right turn lane and designating the lanes to allow vehicles to turn right from the right turn lane and from the adjacent (new) through lane. These improvements would fully mitigate traffic impacts at this intersection to LOS D. First Street at Prospect Avenue —The intersection of 1st Street at Prospect Avenue is currently operating at LOS A in the AM and PM peak hours. Background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to cause a decline in LOS to LOS E in the PM peak hour. The increase in V/C at this intersection is above the impact threshold of 0.03 for the City of Tustin. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of a northbound right turn lane and northbound right turn overlap signal Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 620 10/3/2023 phasing. These improvements will fully mitigate traffic impacts to LOS D. However, as this intersection is outside the jurisdiction of the City of Santa Ana, the City cannot ensure implementation of this improvement. • First Street at Newport Avenue —The intersection of First Street at Newport Avenue currently experiences LOS C or better in the AM and PM peak hours. The addition of background traffic growth is expected to result in a decline in LOS at this intersection to LOS E in the AM peak hour. Although the Overlay Zone would not result in a significant impact at this intersection because the contribution is less than the identified threshold of 0.03, improvements to this intersection are feasible, but not required. The improvements at this intersection include eastbound right turn overlap signal phasing and provision of a third southbound through lane, by constructing a southbound right -turn lane. These improvements will improve intersection performance to LOS C. However, as this intersection is outside the jurisdiction of the City of Santa Ana, the City cannot ensure implementation of this improvement. • Irvine Boulevard at SR-55 Northbound Ramps —The intersection of Irvine Boulevard at SR-55 Northbound Ramps is currently operating at LOS D or better in the AM and PM peak hours. The addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the proposed project is expected to result in a decline in LOS to LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the construction of a westbound free -right turn lane and the conversion of the third eastbound through lane to a second eastbound left turn lane. These improvements fully mitigate traffic impacts at this intersection to LOS D. • Parkcourt at Cabrillo Park Drive —The intersection of Cabrillo Park Drive and Parkcourt currently operates at LOS C or better in the AM and PM peak hours. Level of service is expected to decline to LOS F in the PM peak hour with the addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the prohibition of cross -traffic through the use of median islands, diverters, or other means. This improvement will fully mitigate the traffic impacts at this intersection. • Fruit Street at Cabrillo Park Drive —The intersection of Cabrillo Park Drive and Fruit Street currently operates at LOS B in both the AM and PM peak hours. Future background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to result in a decline in LOS to LOS E in the PM peak hour. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the installation of a traffic signal or a roundabout. Either improvement is expected to result in an improvement to LOS C or better, fully mitigating impacts. • Wellington Avenue at Cabrillo Park Drive —The intersection of Cabrillo Park Drive and Wellington Avenue currently operates at LOS C in both the AM and PM peak hours. Level of service is expected to decline to LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours due to growth in background traffic and traffic from the Overlay Zone. The Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 621 10/3/2023 recommended mitigation for this intersection is the installation of a traffic signal or a roundabout. Either improvement is expected to result in an improvement to LOS B or better, fully mitigating impacts. • Tustin Avenue and Sixth Street —The intersection of Tustin Avenue and Sixth Street currently operates at LOS D in both the AM and PM peak hours. Level of service is expected to decline to LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of background traffic growth and traffic from the Overlay Zone. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the prohibition of eastbound -westbound cross -traffic through the construction of median islands or diverters. This improvement will fully mitigate the traffic impacts at this intersection. Intersection performance will improve to LOS D. • Fourth Street and Parkcenter—The intersection of Fourth Street and Parkcenter currently operates at LOS B in both the AM and PM peak hours. Growth in background traffic and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to result in a decline to LOS F in the PM peak hour. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the installation of a traffic signal. Impacts will be fully mitigated to LOS B. • First Street and B Street —The intersection of First Street and B Street currently operates at LOS E in the PM peak hour. Growth in background traffic and traffic from the Overlay Zone is expected to result in a decline in LOS to LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours. The recommended mitigation for this intersection is the installation of a traffic signal. Impacts will be fully mitigated to LOS B at this intersection. However, as this intersection is outside the jurisdiction of the City of Santa Ana, the City cannot ensure implementation of this improvement. Summary The potential intersection improvements described above are expected to fully mitigate all traffic impacts to an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better), except at one intersection (Fourth Street at Tustin Avenue), as noted above. The Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.12-2 through MM-OZ 4.12-4 shall be implemented to reduce the potential impacts that would occur with implementation and full buildout of the Overlay Zone. Some of the significantly impacted intersections would be located outside of the City's jurisdiction; thus, the City of Santa Ana cannot ensure implementation of the suggested improvements. In addition, at least one of the identified intersections would not be mitigated to a less -than -significant level even with mitigation. Therefore, although it is assumed that a majority of the identified improvement measures could be implemented to mitigate impacts, due to a variety of constraints, at least one (if not more) of the intersections would not be improved to an acceptable level of service. Consequently, full buildout of the Overlay Zone would result in an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system, and this impact was determined to be significant and unavoidable. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 622 10/3/2023 Air Traffic Patterns As discussed previously, the Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is located approximately 6.5 miles northeast of JWA and is located outside of the Airport Planning Area for JWA. However, because the Overlay Zone could result in the development of structures that are more than 200 feet above ground level, filing with the FAA is required. As required by mitigation measure MM- OZ 4.6-4, any future projects within the Overlay Zone that would exceed 200 feet in height (from ground level at the project site) would be required to file a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1). Therefore, compliance with recommendations or guidelines from the FAA would ensure that future development would not result in any change to air traffic patterns. This impact was determined to be less than significant. Parking The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone would consist of approximately 5,551 residential units, over 3.4 million sf of office space, and 1.3 million sf of commercial space. The uses in each zone determine the amount of parking required. Parking requirements within the City of Santa Ana are provided in Chapter 41 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Since the exact uses that would be developed under the Overlay Zone are not known at this time, the precise amount of parking required is not known. As the City's Municipal Code regulates the amount of parking necessary for development within the City, future development within the Overlay Zone would be required to adhere to existing regulations, as well as the guidelines listed above in Table 4.12-9 of the Certified EIR. Any future development projects within the Overlay Zone would be subject to review to ensure compliance with the City's parking requirements of the Overlay Zone and Municipal Code. Thus, future development projects would be required to provide adequate parking, and this impact was determined to be less than significant. Design Hazards The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone will be designed to utilize the existing network of regional and local roadways located within the vicinity of the study area. Three additional street segments may be constructed during implementation of the Overlay Zone in conjunction with reuse of the properties under a private development scenario. Additional proposed changes to road design within the study area as a part of the Overlay Zone could include potential improvement measures. Most of the identified improvements include the addition of one lane to a road segment, or the addition of a turn lane at an intersection and would not represent an increase in hazards associated with a design feature. Rather, these recommended improvements are designed to reduce potential hazards due to congestion. As such, this impact was determined to be less than significant. Emergency Access The Certified EIR stated the Overlay Zone would be required to meet all applicable local and State regulatory standards for adequate emergency access. Emergency access within the Overlay Zone Area is covered previously under the Hazards and Hazardous Materials topic in the Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 623 10/3/2023 discussion of whether the Project would impair an emergency response plan. Adherence to applicable local and state regulatory standards and mitigation measures identified within under that topic ensures this impact remains less than significant. Conflict with Transit, Bicycle, Pedestrian Facilities Plans The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. The Overlay Zone would comply with City of Santa Ana Municipal Code requirements and would provide bicycle racks, parking spaces for carpool/vanpool vehicles, and display rideshare information. In addition, the Overlay Zone is intended to provide a live -work community that would reduce daily vehicle trips, thereby encouraging alternative transportation via pedestrian and bicycle traffic. After analyzing public transit within two miles of the Overlay Zone, the following facilities and/or programs could be incorporated into the project to help encourage public transit patronage for program -related trips. Note that the implementation responsibility for some of these facilities and programs would fall on agencies other than Santa Ana, the lead agency for this project. Thus, coordination between the City of Santa Ana, local and regional transit providers, and the project developer will be required on several of these items. The Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.12-1 shall be implemented, as required by applicable local, state, or federal laws or regulations, or the Overlay Zone. As the Overlay Zone would be consistent with the City's goals and policies pertaining to expanding alternative transportation, and because the Overlay Zone is designed to facilitate alternative transportation, this impact was determined to be less than significant. Congestion Management The Certified EIR stated that the Orange County Transportation Authority is designated as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) to oversee the Orange County CMP. The following three intersections are the only CMP intersections within the study area: • First Street at 1-5 South Bound On Ramp (Santa Ana) • Fourth Street at SR-55 Southbound Ramps (Santa Ana) • Irvine Boulevard at SR-55 Northbound Ramps (Tustin) All three CMP intersections are signalized. As discussed above in the Thresholds of Significance, a traffic -related project contribution is considered significant for the City of Santa Ana intersections if the change in ICU is greater than 0.01, which is more stringent than the CMP criteria. In addition, a traffic related project contribution is considered significant for the City of Tustin intersection if the change in ICU is greater than 0.03, as identified by the CMP. As discussed above in Impact 4.12-7, two of the CMP intersections, Fourth Street/SR-55 Southbound ramps and Irvine Boulevard/SR-55 Northbound ramps, would experience poor LOS due to the proposed project. Implementation of the above identified improvement measures for these two intersections would improve the level of service to acceptable operating conditions (LOS D). Therefore, if the improvement measures are implemented in the future under specific development projects, impacts to these intersections would be less than significant. However, Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 624 10/3/2023 implementation of the improvement measures for these intersections cannot be ensured by the City, particularly because one of the intersections (Irvine Boulevard at SR-55 Northbound Ramps) is located outside of the City's jurisdiction. Therefore, this impact was determined to be considered significant and unavoidable, and the City adopted a statement of overriding considerations. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.12-1 As part of the project, the City of Santa Ana and the project sponsors shall work with the transit providers to implement various transit -related measures to improve and expand bus system service within the Overlay Zone. These measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: • Adding bus stops to the Overlay Zone along existing and proposed roadways • Changing bus service headways to respond to increased demand • Changing bus service destinations to respond to changing demand • Adding local shuttle service for employees and patrons of the Overlay Zone The details of bus service improvements shall be determined in coordination with OCTA. The following recommendations would help encourage public transit patronage for project -related trips: • Bus Stop Locations —Relocation of existing bus stops and the provision of additional bus stops should be considered to accommodate transit users at convenient locations. • Days of Operation —The City should work with OCTA to consider changes to route times to serve nighttime and weekend project visitors and employees. • Headway —The City should work with OCTA to review route headways to determine if it would be appropriate to reduce them to accommodate transit riders within the Overlay Zone. MM-OZ 4.12-2 Future development within the proposed Overlay Zone shall prepare separate traffic studies, specific to the individual projects that are proposed. The traffic studies for future projects shall be prepared by a qualified traffic engineer of the City's choosing. Further, and as determined by the traffic studies, the above identified improvement measures shall be implemented as a condition of the proposed development, either through the direct construction of improvements by the project applicant or through payment of a fee, as required by the program detailed in MM-OZ 4.12-4. MM-OZ 4.12-3 The City of Santa Ana Planning Department, in cooperation with the Department of Public Works, shall monitor the traffic signals within the Overlay Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 625 10/3/2023 Zone Study Area once every five years to ensure that traffic signal timing is optimized. MM-OZ 4.12-4 The City of Santa Ana shall institute a program for systematic mitigation of impacts as development proceeds within the Overlay Zone to ensure mitigation of the individual improvements. The program shall prescribe the method of participation in the mitigation program by individual projects and guide the timely implementation of the mitigation measures. The program should include the following elements: • A funding and improvement program should be established to identify financial resources adequate to construct all identified mitigation measures in a timely basis. • The program should allow for acquisition of entire properties including business relocation where necessary to construct mitigation measures. Funds derived from sale of surplus acquired properties should be returned to the program. • All properties that redevelop within the Overlay Zone should participate in the program on a fair share per new development trip basis. The fair share should be based upon the total cost of all identified mitigation measures, divided by the peak hour trip generation increase forecast. This rate per peak hour trip should be imposed upon the incremental traffic growth for any new development within the Overlay Zone. • The program shall include resources to conduct preliminary engineering studies to complete alignment studies and project specific environmental clearances for Tustin Avenue at Seventeenth Street and at Fourth Street. • The program should raise funds from full development of the Overlay Zone to fund all identified mitigation measures. • The program should monitor phasing development of the Overlay Zone and defer or eliminate improvements if the densities permitted in the Overlay Zone are not occurring. • Program phasing should be monitored through preparation of specific project traffic impact studies for any project that is expected to include more than 100 dwelling units or 100,000 square feet of non-residential development. Traffic impact studies should use traffic generation rates that are deemed to be most appropriate for the actual development proposed. • The program should initiate project development to assure timely completion of the improvements identified to be needed for the First and Cabrillo Towers project by 2010 or as soon after as practically feasible. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 626 10/3/2023 • Properties within Santa Ana and within one-half mile of the Overlay Zone that redevelop to result in higher traffic generation should also participate in the program to insure equity. • The program should provide for full construction of projects outside of Santa Ana, if the Overlay Zone will create a traffic impact based upon the CMP. • The program should provide fair share contribution to construction costs of other improvements outside of the Overlay Zone if they are identified in this traffic study but they are not impacted as defined by the CMP. • The fair share contribution would presume participation by other developments outside of the City of Santa Ana (generally within the City of Tustin) in proportion to traffic growth at the affected sites. • Traffic impact studies for future projects shall be prepared by a qualified traffic engineer approved or retained by the City. • The City may elect to implement appropriate mitigation measures as a condition of approval of the proposed developments, where appropriate. All or part of the costs of these improvements may be considered to be a negotiated credit toward the program, however the program must be administered in a manner that assures that it can fund necessary improvements to maintain adequate level of service at all intersections within this study. If funding of priority improvements cannot be assured, credit for construction of lower priority improvements may not be assured or may be postponed until more program funds are available. • Traffic studies for future developments within the Overlay Zone must also use trip generation rates which are specific for these projects and are approved by the City. The traffic consultant preparing traffic studies for specific projects in the Overlay Zone must use City -approved trip generation rates specific to these projects. These studies are subject to City review. 4.16.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the permitted density, allowable units, or building envelope considered Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 627 10/3/2023 in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. Further, in compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.12-2, a site -specific traffic study has been prepared for the Project by Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers that analyzes the potential traffic impacts consistent with the methodology in the Certified EIR (refer to Attachment G). The Project traffic study concludes that the Project's fair share contribution to following specific improvement measures from the list in the Certified EIR that would mitigate potential impacts: Cabrillo Park Drive/Fourth Street: Widen and provide the additional right-of-way required to construct an exclusive westbound right -turn lane with 125-feet of storage and 90-feet transition. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. SR 55 SR Ramat Fourth Street: Modify the eastbound shared through/right-turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and/or Caltrans. SR 55 NB Ramps at Fourth Street: Modify the eastbound approach to provide dual left -turn lanes and two through lanes. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and/or Caltrans. Per Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.12-2, these improvement measures would be implemented as a condition of the Project, either through the direct construction of improvements or through payment of a fair share contribution fee, as required by the program detailed in Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.12-4. Accordingly, the Project's trips were accounted for in the Certified EIR, and with the required mitigation, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant LOS impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Since adoption of the Certified EIR, the LOS metric for analyzing transportation and traffic impacts under CEQA has been replaced with a VMT analysis to address consistency with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). However, recent California case law confirms that CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) only applies prospectively to CEQA documents that have not yet been circulated for public review and not to CEQA documents that rely on previously certified EIRs that complied with applicable CEQA requirements when publicly reviewed. The court in Olen Properties Corp. v. City of Newport Beach (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 270 explicitly recognizes that VMT impacts were known of and understood at the time the EIR in that case was certified (i.e., 2006, just like the Certified EIR for the Overlay Zone) and therefore do not constitute new information that would trigger recirculation. Thus, a project relying on a previously certified EIR under CEQA Guidelines 15168(c) is not required to provide a VMT analysis if: (1) the previously certified EIR evaluated transportation impacts based on LOS and (2) the subsequent project is within the scope of the impacts assessed in the previously certified EIR and any applicable mitigation measures are adopted The 2006 Certified EIR was certified well before CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) was adopted and relies on an LOS analysis, not a VMT analysis, to analyze the Overlay Zone's transportation impacts. The CEQA findings associated with the Project will not be circulated for Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 628 10/3/2023 public review. Therefore, no VMT analysis is not required to evaluate the Project's consistency with the Certified EIR and the lead agency is evaluating consistency based only on LOS. . In any event, in response to public comments received an analysis of the Project's VMT impacts is included in this document for informational purposes only. VMT Impacts (Informational Purposes Only) The analysis and information presented below are based on the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers in compliance with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019) (refer to Attachment H1), which was confirmed in writing by the Director of Public Works, Zdenek Kekula, on August 22, 2023 (refer to Attachment H2). Project screening is used to determine if a project will be required to conduct a detailed VMT analysis. The following section discusses the various screening methods outlined in the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019), and outlines whether the Project will screen out, either in its entirety or partially, based on individual land uses. The City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines states that several types of projects can be screened out from a VMT assessment using the criteria below, indicating that these projects have the potential to reduce VMT per service population (VMT/SP) and result in a less -than - significant transportation impact: • Projects which serve the local community and have the potential to reduce VMT, such as neighborhood K-12 schools and local -serving retail less than 50,000 square feet (Charter schools are excluded from this criteria). Based on the above, the Project's retail component will screen out since it has local -serving retail of less than 50,000 square feet. • Projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips. Based on the above and as presented in Table 18, the Project will not screen out since it will generate more than 110 net daily trips. • Projects located within TPA or HQTA. Appendix A of the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019) presents the transit priority areas in the City. Due to the many high quality transit routes in the City, much of the City is a transit priority area. o TPA are defined as a % mile radius around an existing or planned major transit stop (e.g., Metrolink Station, Streetcar Station, etc.) or an existing stop along a high quality transit corridor. o HQTAs are defined as a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A map of HQTAs can be reviewed on SCAG's website. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 629 10/3/2023 o Projects that are in TPAs will also be required to complete a secondary screening step to verify the proposed project's consistency with the assumptions from the RTP/SCS. This consistency can be a land use review (e.g., are the proposed land uses already included in the RTP/SCS) or can be reviewed from a VMT/SP perspective (e.g., does the resulting land use increase or decrease the VMT/SP in the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) compared to the RTP/SCS assumptions). Table 18 Proiect Traffic Generation Rates and Forecast Description Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2 Way Enter Exist Total Enter Exit Total Trip Rates 215: Single Family Attached Housing 7.20 31 % 69% 0.48 57% 43% 0.57 221: Multifamily Housing — Mid -Rise 4.54 23% 77% 0.37 61 % 39% 0.39 710: General Office Building 10.84 88% 12% 1.52 17% 83% 1.44 822: Strip Retail Plaza (40k) 54.45 60% 40% 2.36 50% 50% 6.59 Existing Land Use Trip Generation Cabrillo Park Drive and E. 4th Office 1,876 231 32 263 42 207 249 Buildings (173,025 sf) Project Trip Generation Cabrillo Town Center Apartments (449 du) 2,038 38 128 166 107 68 175 Cabrillo Town Center Retail (5,800 sf) 316 8 6 14 19 19 38 Cabrillo Town Center L/W Commercial (11,400 sf) 124 15 2 17 3 13 16 Cabrillo Town Center Townhomes (58 du) 418 9 16 28 19 14 33 Total Project Trip Generation 2,896 70 155 225 148 114 262 Internal Trip Capture 5% -145 -4 -8 -12 -7 -6 -13 Adjusted Project Trip Generation 2,751 66 147 213 141 108 249 Less Existing Trips -1,876 -231 -32 -263 -42 -207 -249 Net Project Trips 875 -165 115 -50 99 -99 0 sf = square feet du = dwelling unit Source: LLG, 2023. Refer to Attachment H1. Based on existing conditions and SCAG data, the Project Site is located within a HQTA (i.e., half a mile from a bus stop located on a single High Quality Transit Corridor [HQTC], defined as a corridor with 15-minute peak hour service or better). Specifically, OCTA Route 64 qualifies as a HQTC because it is a fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours (refer to Attachment H3 for OCTA Routh 64 schedule). There are eight OCTA Route 64 stops located within a'/2 mile of the Project. Further, as discussed above, the proposed land uses are consistent with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. The Project is consistent with the land uses in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, which assumed the Project Site would be constructed as an urban, mixed -use development that would reduce area VMT, consistent with the TPA designation. The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS recognizes that development within Priority Growth Areas, including TPAs, supports mode shift and shortened trip distances. The Project Site is within an identified Priority Growth Area, where urban development can contribute to reduced VMT and associated emissions. The District Center Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 630 10/3/2023 designation permits broad use types, including commercial, retail, hospitality, residential, and office uses that facilitate high -intensity development with an urban character. The Project proposes diverse uses consistent with those permitted by the General Plan — residential, and local serving retail and commercial uses — and would implement development to achieve an urban character and is consistent with the land uses assumed for the project site as part of the 2020- 2045 RTP/SCS. In addition, the Project's consistency has been evaluated with applicable goals and policies of the City's General Plan Circulation Element, including: • Policy 1.1: Coordinate transportation improvements in a manner which minimizes disruptions to the community. • Policy 1.3: Utilize advance technology to improve traffic flow and minimize the need for land acquisition. • Policy 1.4: Maintain at least a level of service "D" on arterial street intersections, except in major development areas. • Policy 1.6: Improve intersection capacity on major arterials to accommodate increased traffic demands. • Policy 2.7: Continue design practices which facilitate the safe use of circulation systems. • Policy 3.1: Support the efforts of regional, state, and federal agencies to enhance local and express bus services. • Policy 3.2: Support programs which complement bus and rail services for specialized transit needs. • Policy 3.3: Support the expansion of commuter rail services. • Policy 3.4: Encourage the development of multi -modal transit opportunities within major development areas. • Policy 3.5: Enhance sidewalks and pedestrian systems to promote their use as a means of travel. Furthermore, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS integrates strategies for land use and transportation centered around sustainability, protecting and preserving existing transportation infrastructure, increasing capacity through improved systems managements, and providing more transportation choices, in order to help reduce GHG emissions from transportation. The City's General Plan consistency, and thus the Project's consistency, with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS can be evaluated based on the following applicable goals: • RTP/SCS G1: Encourage regional economic prosperity and global competitiveness. • RTP/SCS G2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability, and travel safety for people and goods. • RTP/SCS G3: Enhance the preservation, security, and resilience of the regional transportation system. • RTP/SCS G4: Increase person and good movement and travel choices within the transportation system. • RTP/SCS G5: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality. • RTP/SCS G6: Support healthy and equitable communities. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 631 10/3/2023 RTP/SCS G7: Adapt to a changing climate and support an integrated regional development pattern and transportation network. RTP/SCS G8: Leverage new transportation technologies and data driven solutions that result in more efficient travel. Hence, given the above, the Project would screen out of a full VMT analysis even if required since it is within a TPA/HQTA, where existing transit service provided by OCTA provides service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during the peak commute hours. A VMT analysis is only required prospectively for CEQA documents circulated for public review after implementation of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). As the Certified EIR predated the implementation of the VMT requirements outlined in Senate Bill 743 and CEQA Guideline Section 15064.3(b), a VMT analysis was not included in the Certified EIR. Further, the CEQA findings associated with the Project will not be circulated for public review. Therefore, a VMT analysis is not required for the Project, and the determination of consistency with the Certified EIR is based on the LOS discussion above. Nevertheless, a VMT analysis has been produced for informational purposes only in response to public comments received on the topic, which, although legally not required, demonstrates that, consistent with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019) and based on the VMT screening methodology and findings outlined in the Screening Memorandum (refer to Attachment H1), the Project would not result in VMT impacts even if required due to (1) the Project Site's location within a TPA/HQTA (i.e., within '/2 mile of the 8 bus stop along OCTA Route 64 that has a 15-minute peak -hour service (refer to Attachment H3), and (2) the Project's consistency with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS.) Conflict with Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Facilities Plans The Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.12-1, which requires transit -related improvements. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to conflict with transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities plans beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Design Hazards In compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.12-2, the Project has prepared a site -specific traffic study prepared by a qualified traffic engineer that analyzes the potential traffic impacts consistent with the methodology in the Certified EIR (refer to Attachment G). The Project traffic study analyzes the Project Site's access and internal circulation. Additionally, a sight distance analysis was prepared for the Project by Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers, which shows that the Project driveway is expected to be adequate (refer to Attachment I). Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to a design hazard beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 632 10/3/2023 Emergency Access The Project would implement MM-OZ 4.6-7, requiring coordination with the City Fire Department in preparation of an Emergency Preparedness Plan. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to emergency access beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Mitigation Measures The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.4.12-1, MM-OZ 4.4.12-2, MM-OZ 4.4.12-4 and MM-OZ 4.6-7 from the Certified EIR, including the following specific improvements identified in the site -specific traffic study prepared for the Project in accordance with Mitigation Measure MM 4.12-2: Cabrillo Park Drive/Fourth Street: Widen and provide the additional right-of-way required to construct an exclusive westbound right -turn lane with 125-feet of storage and 90-feet transition. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. SR 55 SIB Ramps at Fourth Street: Modify the eastbound shared through/right-turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and/or Caltrans. SR 55 NB Ramps at Fourth Street: Modify the eastbound approach to provide dual left -turn lanes and two through lanes. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and/or Caltrans. 4.16.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to transportation have occurred, and no substantial new significant traffic sources have been identified within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.16.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to transportation that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts related to transportation. 4.16.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.4.12-1 and MM-OZ 4.6-7 from the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 633 10/3/2023 4.16.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant transportation impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified transportation impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to transportation do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 634 10/3/2023 4.17 Tribal Cultural Resources Issues (and supporting Information Sources) TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: (a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, please, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: Any Substantial Changes Involving New Significant Impacts or Impact Substantially Determination More Severe in EIR Impacts? Any Substantially Changed Circumstances Involving New Any New Significant Impact Information Project or Substantially of Incorporates More Severe Substantial Mitigation Impacts? Importance Measure(s)? (i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in the local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? NA NA NA NA NA (ii) A resource determined by the lead agency in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? NA NA NA NA NA 4.17.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Tribal cultural resources was not a topic in the 2006 CEQA Guidelines. Thus, the Certified EIR did not include an analysis of tribal cultural resources impacts. Mitigation Measures Not applicable. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 635 10/3/2023 4.17.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? Assembly Bill (AB) 52 went into effect on July 1, 2015, and requires that for a project for which a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for a Draft EIR was filed on or after July 1, 2015, the lead agency is required to consult with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project, if: (1) the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic area; and (2) the tribe requests consultation, prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration or environmental impact report for a project. The NOP for the Certified EIR was released on March 10, 2006, and as such, the lead agency was not required to comply with the requirements of AB 52. The Final Certified EIR was released in 2007, and thus, did not include responses to the updated Appendix G questions related to tribal cultural resources. AB 52 tribal consultation is also only required prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report. Because the Project relies on the Certified EIR as a later activity, no negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report will be released. Therefore, AB 52 tribal consultation is not required for the Project. The Certified EIR stated that according to the City of Santa Ana Land Use Element EIR, an archaeological records search at the UCLA Institute of Archaeology indicated there is a single recorded prehistoric site within the City. The site, near Santiago Creek in the northwest section of the City, contained grinding stones and was disturbed by the development of a residential subdivision in 1965. An additional six prehistoric sites are located within one mile of the City boundaries. Eighteen post contact (following European contact) archaeological sites have also been identified in the City. None of these known archaeological resources occur within the Overlay Zone boundaries. However, the presence of historic and archaeological sites in the City indicates that the City (including the Overlay Zone) has a potential for archaeological and historical resources and the resources of prehistoric and historic cultures may still be intact beneath existing developments. An archival records search for known archaeological sites was made at the SCCIC for a study area encompassing the Overlay Zone and an additional 1/2-mile "buffer zone" beyond the Overlay Zone boundaries. No archaeological sites have been identified within the Overlay Zone or within the 0.5-mile radius beyond the Overlay Zone included in the study area. This does not preclude the potential for archaeological sites to be identified during future ground -disturbing construction activities. Further, it should be noted that the Native American Heritage Commission was consulted with regard to the Overlay Zone, and no known Native American cultural resources are known to occur in the area. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 636 10/3/2023 The Certified EIR concluded that implementation of the Overlay Zone has the potential to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, but implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.4- 2 through MM-OZ 4.4-4 that require monitoring by a qualified archaeologist during any ground - disturbing activities below 10 feet below ground surface, evaluation of any uncovered resources, and coordination with the County Coroner and the NAHC if human remains are uncovered would ensure that impacts related to unknown archaeological resources, including tribal cultural resources, will be less than significant. As discussed previously in this document, the Project would include excavation beyond 10 feet below ground surface and would be required to implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.4-2 and MM-OZ 4.4-3, requiring construction monitoring by a qualified archeologist and certain actions in the event that a potential resource is encountered during Project construction. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to archaeological resources, including tribal resources, beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Mitigation Measures Not applicable. 4.17.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to tribal cultural resources have occurred, and no substantial new sources of tribal cultural resources have been identified within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.17.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance which has become available relative to tribal cultural resources that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.17.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts Not applicable. 4.17.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant tribal cultural resources or a substantial increase in previously identified tribal cultural resources would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to tribal cultural resources do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 637 10/3/2023 4.18 Utilities and Service Systems Any Substantial Any Substantially Changes Changed Involving New Circumstances Significant Involving New Any New Impacts or Significant Impact Information Project Impact Substantially or Substantially of Incorporates Issues (and supporting Determination More Severe More Severe Substantial Mitigation Information Sources) in EIR Impacts? Impacts? Importance? Measure(s)? UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: (a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric Less Than power, natural gas, or Significant No No No No telecommunications facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environment effects? (b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable Less Than No No No No future development during Significant normal, dry, and multiple dry years? (c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has Less Than adequate capacity to serve No No No No Significant the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the Less Than capacity of local No No No No Significant infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? (e) Comply with federal, state and local management and Less Than reduction statutes and No No No No Significant regulations related to solid waste? 4.18.1 Impact Determination in the EIR Water Treatment The Certified EIR stated that the City's imported surface water supply is primarily treated at the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Diemer Filtration Plant, located in Yorba Linda, with a treatment capacity of approximately 520 million gallons per day of water (MGD,) flowing at an average of 140 MGD in the winter (27 percent capacity) and 375 MGD in the summer (72 percent capacity). In addition to Diemer-treated imported water, the City also receives potable water from Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 638 10/3/2023 MWD's Weymouth Filtration Plant, which operates at approximately 42 percent capacity during the winter and 65 percent capacity during the summer. Additional development accommodated under the Overlay Zone would increase water use within the City, thus increasing the need for water treatment services. As discussed above, MWD can meet 100 percent of the City's imported water needs until at least the year 2030. Beyond that date, improvements associated with the State Water Project supply, additional local projects, water conservation, and additional water transfers may be needed to adequately serve the City. The Orange County Water District (OCWD), which provides the groundwater supply to the City, anticipates that there would be sufficient groundwater supplies to meet projected future demand requirements in Santa Ana. Implementation of the Overlay Zone would not require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Wastewater Treatment Implementation of the Overlay Zone would generate additional demand on the existing sewer system from increased sewage flows. New residential, commercial and office growth would generate wastewater that would require treatment. As described in the Existing Conditions section, wastewater service within the Overlay Zone area is provided by the City and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). Wastewater from the City's system and OCSD is treated by the OCSD at their two treatment plants. The OCSD Treatment Plant No. 1 maintains a design capacity of 174 mgd and treats on average a flow of 90 mgd. Treatment Plant No. 2 maintains a design capacity of 276 mgd and treats on average a flow of 153 mgd. Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 are operating at 52 percent and 55 percent of design capacity, respectively. Therefore, each of the treatment plants serving the City is operating below their design capacity. The additional 1.106 mgd of wastewater, as stated above under Impact 4.13-4, would be distributed between OCSD Treatment Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. Each of these plants has the capacity to treat the full increase in sewage from the Overlay Zone. To illustrate the most conservative analysis, if the entire Overlay Zone's wastewater went to Treatment Plant No. 1, its average flow would increase to approximately 91 mgd, an increase of 1.1 percent, and the plant would still operate below its design capacity. If the entire City's sewage were directed to Treatment Plant No. 2, its average flow would increase to approximately 154 mgd, an increase of 0.6 percent, and the plant would operate below its design capacity. Because increased wastewater due to implementation of the proposed General Plan Update could be accommodated within the existing treatment infrastructure, expansion would not be required. Therefore, impacts to the wastewater treatment facilities associated with increased growth in the City would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. OCSD maintains certain trunk sewer lines that may require expansion on an as needed basis due to incremental increases in sewage generation as a result of a new development. The City would also maintain local sewer lines and upgrades as part of individual projects. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.13-1 would ensure that any new development within the Overlay Zone does not result in an exceedance of an existing sewer conveyance capacity for City and OCSD facilities, and impacts would be less than significant. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 639 10/3/2023 Storm Water Drainage The Certified EIR stated that adherence to Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-1 would require the preparation of a WQMP and implementation of appropriate BMPs, which could incorporate stormwater detention facilities, and would reduce the volume of runoff generated (and potential for flooding) in the Overlay Zone. However, because the existing capacity of the existing storm drain system in the Overlay Zone is unknown, this is considered a potentially significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.7-2 would be required to address these issues. Water Supply The Certified EIR stated that domestic water for the Overlay Zone is supplied by both groundwater and imported surface water sources, as discussed above. A majority of water supplied to the Overlay Zone is supplied by groundwater from the Basin. Specifically, approximately 69 percent of the water supplied by the City's service area is supplied by groundwater from the Basin, and the remaining 31 percent of water supply is provided by MWD. Implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would increase the population and amount of development within the City, which in turn would increase the demand for water supplies. The Overlay Zone would allow a maximum of 6,661,489 square feet of residential, 3,410,507 square feet of office space and 1,275,440 square feet of commercial space at completion. A Water Supply Assessment was done by Dudek to assess the water demand and supply conditions for the Overlay Zone area. According to the WSA provided as Appendix I to the Certified EIR, analysis of water supply projections for the City demonstrates that projected supplies will exceed demand through the year 2030. These projections consider land use based on the Metro East Mixed -Use Zone development intensities; projections from the City's 2005 UWMP; water development programs and projects; and water conservation. Analysis shows that groundwater and imported water are anticipated to remain stable to the City, based on studies and reports of the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan), respectively. The 20-year projection, and beyond, of water demand will be met by approximately 70 percent groundwater, based on an expected long-term Basin Production Percentage (BPP), and 30 percent imported water confirmed reliable by Metropolitan. Additionally, analysis of normal, single -dry, and multiple -dry year scenarios also demonstrate the City's ability to meet or exceed demand during the 20-year planning period, even under reduced imported water supply conditions. Additionally, the City has the opportunity to increase supply to meet demand, if extraordinary circumstances require, through the following measures: 1) production of groundwater above the BPP up to the basin safe yield; 2) increasing imported water purchases; and 3) increased water conservation measures. Reliability of future water supplies to the region will be ensured through continued implementation of the local agency programs, OCWD's Long - Term Facilities Plan, and the combined efforts and programs among member agencies of Metropolitan, such as the Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) and proposed Capital Improvement Program. Agencies include all water wholesalers and retailers, the Orange County Sanitation Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 640 10/3/2023 District (OCSD), the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). Collectively, the information included in this Water Supply Assessment identifies a sufficient water supply and reliability to the City, now and into the future, including a sufficient water supply for the Overlay Zone. Also, the expansion of the existing network of water lines will not be required for the purpose of the project. The existing network would ensure continuous water supply with adequate volume and pressure and quality at all times to the Overlay Zone. However, should improvements to the existing water system be required or additional facilities be deemed necessary, the property developer would be required to pay its fair share of the cost of all or portions of the needed improvements. Thus, the impact of the Project on water services would be less than significant. No mitigation measures would be required. Electricity/Natural Gas The Certified EIR stated that in peak days, the increase in demand from implementation of future development under the Overlay Zone would contribute to electricity supply and delivery constraints. However, all future development would be constructed in compliance with Title 24 energy efficiency standards. By the time future development would be constructed under the Overlay Zone, it is expected that some steps outlined in the CEC action plan will have been implemented to alleviate energy constraints. If these constraints do remain, they could be addressed through "rolling blackouts," which are limited to specific geographic areas for a period of hours. Further, if energy constraints remain, they are a reflection of the broad energy supply issues experienced by California as a whole, and not unique to the demands of the development in the City. Further, the CEC licensed two additional power plants in 2001 that were anticipated to provide California with electrical energy supply capacity and the ability to meet peak load demand in excess of forecasts of regional energy supplies. Consequently, although the Overlay Zone would result in an increased electricity demand in the City, additional energy demands resulting from the Overlay Zone would be adequately met by current and planned infrastructure during most of the year. Further, development under the Overlay Zone would be required to comply with the energy conservation measures contained in Title 24, which would reduce the amount of energy needed for the operation of any buildings constructed as a part of the Overlay Zone. Additionally, the current electrical demand of the Overlay Zone is within the capacity limitations of the electrical facilities serving the City. Excluding any unforeseen problems, existing distribution resources have the ability to serve all existing customer loads in accordance with its rules and tariffs. The projected electrical demand of the Overlay Zone area and for build -out under the Overlay Zone is expected to be within SCE's current 10-year load forecasts. Though SCE's total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually, excluding any unforeseen problems, SCE's plans for new distribution resources would be adequate to serve all existing and new customer loads throughout the next decade. SCE does not expect that utilities deregulation will Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 641 10/3/2023 affect service to the Overlay Zone area. However, to reduce any potential impacts associated with build out of the Overlay Zone, SCE recommends the use of energy -efficient and high-performance design for nonresidential and residential building design and construction. SCGC declares itself a "reactive" utility and will provide natural gas as customers request its services. SCGC has also indicated that an adequate supply of natural gas is available to serve additional development, and that the natural gas level of service provided to the City would not be impaired by buildout under the Overlay Zone. Any expansion of service necessitated by implementation of the Overlay Zone would be in accordance with SCGC's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual agreements are made. Although the Overlay Zone would result in the energy demand increases in demand noted above, an adequate energy supply is anticipated to be available, as the electrical and gas supplies and infrastructure to support demand are provided as needed by SCE and SCGC. Therefore, the Overlay Zone would not substantially increase demands beyond the available supply. In case of electricity, the cost associated with relocating the facilities, if required shall be borne by the developer. The developer will also be required to make contractual arrangements with SCGC prior to initiation of construction for the gas. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall coordinate with SCE/SCGC to determine the exact location of all underground and overhead electrical/gas facilities. All electrical/gas facilities and associated structures left on the site shall be protected from damage. Grading plans should reflect the undergrounding of utility lines serving the project The project -generated demand for electricity and natural gas would be negligible in the context of overall demand within the City of Santa Ana and the state and thus is not anticipated to require substantial upgrades or expansion of existing energy systems. Though the project would not increase the energy demand significantly, mitigation measures are suggested to promote conservation of energy to further reduce the impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.13-2 would foster efficient energy use and ensure that a less than significant impact remains with respect to energy. Solid Waste The Certified EIR stated that based on the existing uses, the Overlay Zone generates a total of 9.54 tons of waste every day. The entire waste generated is hauled to the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill. The solid waste generation of the Overlay Zone is expected to increase by 15.62 tons/day or 164 percent compared to existing conditions. However, the amount signifies less than one percent of the existing maximum permitted capacity of 8,500 tons per day of the landfill. Compliance with the City's recycling program would further reduce long-term solid waste disposal service impacts. Thus, the project would have a less than significant impact on the landfill capacity. No mitigation is required. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 642 10/3/2023 Additionally, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) requires that local jurisdictions divert at least 50 percent of all solid waste generated by January 1, 2000. Per the City Program, individual projects within the Overlay zone would be required to comply with the Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) program for diverting the solid waste. The City already diverts 60 percent of its solid waste generated and is well above the compliance levels. Under the SRRE program, implementation of the Overlay Zone would be consistent with AB 939 as well. Thus, a less -than- significant impact would occur. No mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.13-1 The developer is required to undertake a site -specific sewer evaluation, including flow monitoring required as part of the project design to determine the adequacy of the existing sewer pipe capacity in the affected project area lines. MM-OZ 4.13-2 The project shall implement energy conservation measures (such as energy - efficient lighting and micro -processor -controlled HVAC equipment) to reduce the demand for electricity and natural measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed or if current technology becomes obsolete through replacement. 4.18.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project includes the demolition and removal of all existing improvements from the Project Site and development of the site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units, approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space, all of which is allowed under the Overlay Zone, and is consistent with the Overlay Zone standards. The Project does not include any development that would extend beyond the permitted uses, density, and intensity or building envelope considered in the Certified EIR, and no changes are proposed to the Overlay Zone to accommodate the Project. The Project's water demand is within the envelope of projected water usage analyzed as part of the WSA conducted for the Certified EIR that concluded the uses and development density and intensity proposed within the Overlay Zone could be adequately served by the water purveyor. As discussed below, the Project would incorporate mitigation measures to further minimize impacts related to utilities and service systems, and accordingly, would not result in any new or increased significant impacts beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. The Project's water and wastewater treatment requirements have been accounted for in the Certified EIR. The Project would be required to implement MM-OZ 4.7-2, which requires preparation of a Hydrology and Hydraulic Study to ensure the existing storm drain capacity could accommodate the Project. Further, the Project's energy consumption and solid waste generation has also been accounted for in the Certified EIR. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to utilities and service systems beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 643 10/3/2023 Finally, in the Project Site area, existing telephone service is typically provided by AT&T, and existing cable television/internet is typically provided by Spectrum (formerly Time Warner Cable). The Project Site could be served by existing telecommunications facilities that are available in the Project Site area and would not require new or expanded facilities. Therefore, Project impacts related to telecommunications facilities would be less than significant. 4.18.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to utilities and service systems have occurred within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.18.4 Any new information of substantial importance that demonstrates that the Project would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts? There is no new information of substantial importance that has become available relative to utilities and service systemsthat would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts related to utilities. 4.18.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.13-1 and MM-OZ 4.13-2 from the Certified EIR. 4.18.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant utilities and service system impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified utility impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts on utilities and service systems do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 644 10/3/2023 4.19 Wildfire Issues (and supporting Information Sources) Impact Determination in EIR Any Substantial Changes Involving New Significant Impacts or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any Substantially Changed Circumstances Involving New Significant Impact or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Information of Substantial Importance? Project Incorporates Mitigation Measure(s)? WILDFIRE: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: (a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency No Impact No No No No evacuation plan? (b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project No Impact No No No No occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? (c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, No Impact No No No No power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? (d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a No Impact No No No No result of runoff post -fire slope instability, or drainage change? 4.19.1 Impact Determination in the EIR The Certified EIR stated that the Overlay Zone is located in a dense urban environment and is surrounded by existing development. There are no wildland areas, nor wildland interface areas, located in the project vicinity. Consequently, no wildland fires would affect, or be affected by, implementation of the Project. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures None required or identified. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 645 10/3/2023 4.19.2Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? The Project Site is located in a dense urban environment and is surrounded by existing development. There are no wildland areas, nor wildland interface areas, located in the vicinity of the Project Site. The Project site is also not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone or a State Responsibility Area. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to wildland fires beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. Mitigation Measures None required. 4.19.3 Any substantial changes in circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR? No substantial changes in the circumstances related to wildfire have occurred, and no substantial new sources or wildfire have been identified within the vicinity of the Project since the certification of the Certified EIR that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.19.4 Any New Information of Substantial Importance? There is no new information of substantial importance which has become available relative to wildfire that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. 4.19.5 Mitigation Measures Addressing Impacts None required. 4.19.6 Conclusion Based on the above, no new significant wildfire impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified wildfire impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the impacts to wildfire do not meet the standards for a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana Technical Memorandum August 2023 City Council 18 — 646 10/3/2023 AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT Introduction This technical report addresses the air quality impacts generated by construction and operation of the proposed Cabrillo Town Center project in the City of Santa Ana. The analysis evaluates the consistency of the Project with the air quality policies set forth within the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and the City's General Plan. The analysis of Project -generated air emissions focuses on whether the Project would cause an exceedance of an ambient air quality standard or SCAQMD significance threshold. Calculation worksheets, assumptions, and model outputs used in the analysis are included in the Technical Appendix to this analysis. Regulatory Framework Federal The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous times in subsequent years, with the most recent amendments in 1990. At the federal level, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is responsible for implementation of some portions of the CAA (e.g., certain mobile source and other requirements). Other portions of the CAA (e.g., stationary source requirements) are implemented by state and local agencies. In California, the CCAA is administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) at the state level and by the air quality management districts and air pollution control districts at the regional and local levels. The 1990 amendments to the CAA identify specific emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). These amendments require both a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward attainment and incorporation of additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. The sections of the CAA which are most applicable to the Project include Title I (Nonattainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile Source Provisions). NAAQS have been established for seven major air pollutants: CO (carbon monoxide), NO2 (nitrogen dioxide), Os (ozone), PM2.5 (particulate matter, 2.5 microns), PM10 (particulate matter, 10 microns), S02 (sulfur dioxide), and Pb (lead). The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the USEPA to designate areas as attainment, nonattainment, or maintenance (previously nonattainment and currently attainment) for each criteria pollutant based on whether the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) have been achieved. Title I provisions are implemented for the purpose of attaining NAAQS. The federal standards are summarized in Table 1. The USEPA has classified Orange County as a nonattainment area for Os, PM2.5, and Pb. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 18-647 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 1 State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status for LA County Averaging California Federal Standards Attainment Status Standards Attainment Status Pollutant Period 1-hour 0.09 ppm (180 pg/m3) Non -attainment -- -- Ozone (03) 8-hour 37 0 ppm) N/A' 7 0 ppm) Non -attainment (0 (00 Respirable 24-hour 50 pg/m3 Non -attainment 150 pg/m3 Maintenance Particulate Matter Annual Arithmetic 20 pg/m3 Non -attainment (PM10) Mean 24-hour -- -- 35 pg/m3 Non -attainment Fine Particulate iwatier krivi z.$) Annual Arithmetic 12 pg/m3 Non -attainment 12 pg/m3 Non -attainment Mean 20 ppm 35 ppm Carbon Monoxide 1-hour (23 mg/m3) Attainment (40 mg/m3) Maintenance (CO) 9.0 ppm 9 ppm 8-hour (10 mg/m3) Attainment (10 mg/m3) Maintenance 0.18 ppm 100 ppb Nitrogen Dioxide 1-hour (338 pg/m3) Attainment (188 pg/m3) Maintenance 2 Annual Arithmetic 0.030 ppm 53 ppb Mean (57 pg/m3) Attainment (100 pg/m3) Maintenance 0.(6 25 pm ppb 1-hour Ngpm) Attainment (196 Attainment Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 0.04 ppm 24-hour (105 pg/m3) Attainment -- -- Lead 30-day average 1.5 pg/m3 Attainment -- -- (Pb) Calendar Ouartp L -- I-- 0.15 pg/m3 Non -attainment Visibility Reducing Extinction of Particles 8-hour 0.07 per N/A No Federal Standards kilometer Sulfates 24-hour 25 pg/m3 Attainment No Federal Standards Hydrogen Sulfide 0.03 ppm AS) 1-hour 42 /m3 Unclassified No Federal Standards Vinyl Chloride 24-hour 0.01 ppm 26 /m3 N/A No Federal Standards IN/A = not available Source: CARB, Ambient Air Quality Standards, and attainment status, 2020 www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm . Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE City of Santa Ana 18 — 648 10/3/2023 July 2023 CAA Title II pertains to mobile sources, such as cars, trucks, buses, and planes. Reformulated gasoline and automobile pollution control devices are examples of the mechanisms the USEPA uses to regulate mobile air emission sources. The provisions of Title II have resulted in tailpipe emission standards for vehicles, which have been strengthened in recent years to improve air quality. For example, the standards for NOx emissions have been lowered substantially and the specification requirements for cleaner burning gasoline are more stringent. The USEPA regulates emission sources that are under the exclusive authority of the federal government, such as aircraft, ships, and certain types of locomotives. USEPA has jurisdiction over emission sources outside state waters (e.g., beyond the outer continental shelf) and establishes various emission standards, including those for vehicles sold in states other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet stricter emission standards established by CARB. USEPA adopted multiple tiers of emission standards to reduce emissions from non -road diesel engines (e.g., diesel -powered construction equipment) by integrating engine and fuel controls as a system to gain the greatest emission reductions. The first federal standards (Tier 1) for new non -road (or off -road) diesel engines were adopted in 1994 for engines over 50 horsepower, to be phased -in from 1996 to 2000. On August 27, 1998, USEPA introduced Tier 1 standards for equipment under 37 kW (50 horsepower) and increasingly more stringent Tier 2 and Tier 3 standards for all equipment with phase -in schedules from 2000 to 2008. The Tier 1 through 3 standards were met through advanced engine design, with no or only limited use of exhaust gas after -treatment (oxidation catalysts). Tier 3 standards for NOx and hydrocarbon are similar in stringency to the 2004 standards for highway engines. However, Tier 3 standards for particulate matter were never adopted. On May 11, 2004, USEPA signed the final rule introducing Tier 4 emission standards, which were phased -in between 2008 and 2015. The Tier 4 standards require that emissions of particulate matter and NOx be further reduced by about 90 percent. Such emission reductions are achieved through the use of control technologies —including advanced exhaust gas after -treatment. State California Clean Air Act. In addition to being subject to the requirements of CAA, air quality in California is also governed by more stringent regulations under the California Clean Air Act (CCAA). In California, CCAA is administered by CARB at the state level and by the air quality management districts and air pollution control districts at the regional and local levels. CARB, which became part of the California Environmental Protection Agency in 1991, is responsible for meeting the state requirements of the CAA, administering the CCAA, and establishing the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The CCAA, as amended in 1992, requires all air districts in the State to endeavor to achieve and maintain the CAAQS. CAAQS are generally more stringent than the corresponding federal standards and incorporate additional standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility -reducing particles. CARB regulates mobile air pollution sources, such as motor vehicles. CARB is responsible for setting emission standards for vehicles sold in California and for other emission sources, such as consumer products and certain off -road equipment. CARB established passenger vehicle fuel specifications in March 1996. CARB oversees the functions of local air pollution control districts and air quality management districts, which, in turn, administer air quality activities at the regional and county levels. The State standards are summarized in Table 1. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 3 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 The CCAA requires CARB to designate areas within California as either attainment or nonattainment for each criteria pollutant based on whether the CAAQS thresholds have been achieved. Under the CCAA, areas are designated as nonattainment for a pollutant if air quality data shows that a state standard for the pollutant was violated at least once during the previous three calendar years. Exceedances that are affected by highly irregular or infrequent events are not considered violations of a state standard and are not used as a basis for designating areas as nonattainment. Under the CCAA, Orange County is designated as a nonattainment area for Os, PM,o, and PM2.5. In August 2022, CARB approved regulations to ban new gasoline -powered cars beginning with 2035 models. Automakers will gradually electrify their fleet of new vehicles, beginning with 35 percent of 2026 models sold. In March 2023, USEPA approved CARB's regulations that mandate that all new medium - and heavy-duty trucks would be zero emissions by 2045 where feasible. Trucking companies would also have to gradually convert their existing fleets to zero emission vehicles. Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act. The public's exposure to toxic air contaminants (TACs) is a significant public health issue in California. CARB's statewide comprehensive air toxics program was established in the early 1980s. The Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act created California's program to reduce exposure to air toxics. Under the Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act, CARB is required to use certain criteria in the prioritization for the identification and control of air toxics. In selecting substances for review, CARB must consider criteria relating to "the risk of harm to public health, amount or potential amount of emissions, manner of, and exposure to, usage of the substance in California, persistence in the atmosphere, and ambient concentrations in the community" [Health and Safety Code Section 39666(f)]. The Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act also requires CARB to use available information gathered from the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act program to include in the prioritization of compounds. CARB identified particulate emissions from diesel -fueled engines (diesel PM) TACs in August 1998. Following the identification process, CARB was required by law to determine if there is a need for further control, which led to the risk management phase of the program. For the risk management phase, CARB formed the Diesel Advisory Committee to assist in the development of a risk management guidance document and a risk reduction plan. With the assistance of the Diesel Advisory Committee and its subcommittees, CARB developed the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel -Fueled Engines and Vehicles and the Risk Management Guidance for the Permitting of New Stationary Diesel -Fueled Engines. The Board approved these documents on September 28, 2000, paving the way for the next step in the regulatory process: the control measure phase. During the control measure phase, specific Statewide regulations designed to further reduce diesel PM emissions from diesel -fueled engines and vehicles have and continue to be evaluated and developed. The goal of each regulation is to make diesel engines as clean as possible by establishing state-of-the-art technology requirements or emission standards to reduce diesel PM emissions. Breathing H2S at levels above the state standard could result in exposure to a disagreeable rotten eggs odor. The State does not regulate other odors. California Air Toxics Program. The California Air Toxics Program was established in 1983, when the California Legislature adopted Assembly Bill (AB) 1807 to establish a two-step process of risk identification and risk management to address potential health effects from exposure to toxic substances Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 18-650 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 in the air.' In the risk identification step, CARB and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) determine if a substance should be formally identified, or "listed," as a TAC in California. Since inception of the program, a number of such substances have been listed, including benzene, chloroform, formaldehyde, and particulate emissions from diesel -fueled engines, among others.z In 1993, the California Legislature amended the program to identify the 189 federal hazardous air pollutants as TACs. In the risk management step, CARB reviews emission sources of an identified TAC to determine whether regulatory action is needed to reduce risk. Based on results of that review, CARB has promulgated a number of airborne toxic control measures (ATCMs), both for mobile and stationary sources. In 2004, CARB adopted an ATCM to limit heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel PM and other TACs. The measure applies to diesel -fueled commercial vehicles with gross vehicle weight ratings greater than 10,000 pounds that are licensed to operate on highways, regardless of where they are registered. This measure does not allow diesel -fueled commercial vehicles to idle for more than five minutes at any given time. In addition to limiting exhaust from idling trucks, CARB adopted regulations on July 26, 2007 for off -road diesel construction equipment such as bulldozers, loaders, backhoes, and forklifts, as well as many other self-propelled off -road diesel vehicles to reduce emissions by installation of diesel particulate filters and encouraging the replacement of older, dirtier engines with newer emission -controlled models. In April 2021, CARB proposed a 2020 Mobile Source Strategy that seeks to move California to 100 percent zero -emission off -road equipment by 2035. Assembly Bill 2588 Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program. The AB 1807 program is supplemented by the AB 2588 Air Toxics "Hot Spots" program, which was established by the California Legislature in 1987. Under this program, facilities are required to report their air toxics emissions, assess health risks, and notify nearby residents and workers of significant risks if present. In 1992, the AB 2588 program was amended by Senate Bill (SB) 1731 to require facilities that pose a significant health risk to the community to reduce their risk through implementation of a risk management plan. Air QualitV and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. The Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective provides important air quality information about certain types of facilities (e.g., freeways, refineries, rail yards, ports) that should be considered when siting sensitive land uses such as residences.3 CARB provides recommended site distances from certain types of facilities when considering siting new sensitive land uses. The recommendations are advisory and should not be interpreted as defined "buffer zones." If a project is within the siting distance, CARB recommends further analysis. Where possible, CARB recommends a minimum separation between new sensitive land uses and existing sources. 1 California Air Resources Board, California Air Toxics Program, www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/toxics.htm, last reviewed by CARB September 24, 2015. 2 California Air Resources Board, Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List, www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm, last reviewed by CARB July 18, 2011. 3 California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook, a Community Health Perspective, April 2005. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 5 City of Santa Ana Air Quality ifV touriCl 18 — 651 10/3/2023 July 2023 Air QualitV and Land Use Handbook. CARB published the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook (CARB Handbook) on April 28, 2005 to serve as a general guide for considering health effects associated with siting sensitive receptors proximate to sources of TAC emissions. The recommendations provided therein are voluntary and do not constitute a requirement or mandate for either land use agencies or local air districts. The goal of the guidance document is to protect sensitive receptors, such as children, the elderly, acutely ill, and chronically ill persons, from exposure to TAC emissions. Some examples of CARB's siting recommendations include the following: (1) avoid siting sensitive receptors within 500 feet of a freeway, urban road with 100,000 vehicles per day, or rural roads with 50,000 vehicles per day; (2) avoid siting sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of a distribution center (that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day, more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units per day, or where transport refrigeration unit operations exceed 300 hours per week); and (3) avoid siting sensitive receptors within 300 feet of any dry cleaning operation using perch loroethylene and within 500 feet of operations with two or more machines. California Code of Regulations. The California Code of Regulations (CCR) is the official compilation and publication of regulations adopted, amended or repealed by the state agencies pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act. The CCR includes regulations that pertain to air quality emissions. Specifically, Section 2485 in CCR Title 13 states that the idling of all diesel -fueled commercial vehicles (weighing over 10,000 pounds) used during construction shall be limited to five minutes at any location. In addition, Section 93115 in CCR Title 17 states that operation of any stationary, diesel -fueled, compression -ignition engines shall meet specified fuel and fuel additive requirements and emission standards. Regional (South Coast Air Quality Management District) The SCAQMD was created in 1977 to coordinate air quality planning efforts throughout Southern California. SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the region. Specifically, SCAQMD is responsible for monitoring air quality, as well as planning, implementing, and enforcing programs designed to attain and maintain the CAAQS and NAAQS in the district. SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an area of 10,743 square miles consisting of Orange County; the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties; and the Riverside County portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin and Mojave Desert Air Basin. The Basin portion of SCAQMD's jurisdiction covers an area of 6,745 square miles. The Basin includes all of Orange County and the non - desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. Programs that were developed by SCAQMD to attain and maintain the CAAQS and NAAQS include air quality rules and regulations that regulate stationary sources, area sources, point sources, and certain mobile source emissions. SCAQMD is also responsible for establishing stationary source permitting requirements and for ensuring that new, modified, or relocated stationary sources do not create net emission increases. However, SCAQMD has primary authority over about 20 percent of NO,, emissions, a precursor to ozone formation. All projects in the SCAQMD jurisdiction are subject to SCAQMD rules and regulations, including, but not limited to the following: Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 6 18-652 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 • SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that a person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other materials which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. • SCAQMD Rule 403, would reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in ambient air as a result of anthropogenic fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust emissions. • SCAQMD Rule 431.2, would require use of low -sulfur fuel in construction equipment. • SCAQMD Rule 445 would prohibit the inclusion of wood burning fireplaces in any residences. • SCAQMD Rule 1113, which limits the VOC content of architectural coatings. • In accordance with Section 2485 in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, the idling of all diesel -fueled commercial vehicles (with gross vehicle weight over 10,000 pounds) during construction would be limited to five minutes at any location. • In accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, operation of any stationary, diesel -fueled, compression -ignition engines would meet specific fuel and fuel additive requirements and emissions standards. Air Quality Management Plan. SCAQMD adopted the 2022 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) on December 2, 2022, updating the region's air quality attainment plan to address the "extreme" ozone non - attainment status for the Basin and the severe ozone non -attainment for the Coachella Valley Basin by laying a path for attainment by 2037. This includes reducing NOx emissions by 67 percent more than required by adopted rules and regulations in 2037. The AQMP calls on strengthening many stationary source controls and addressing new sources like wildfires, but still concludes that the region will not meet air quality standards without a significant shift to zero emission technologies and significant federal action. The 2022 AQMP relies on the growth assumptions in SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study V. To date, the most comprehensive study on air toxics in the Basin is the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study V, released in August 2021.4 The report included refinements in aircraft and recreational boating emissions and diesel conversion factors. It finds a Basin average cancer risk of 455 in a million (population -weighted, multi -pathway), which represents a decrease of 54 percent compared to the estimate in MATES IV (page ES-13). The monitoring program measured more than 30 air pollutants, including both gases and particulates. The monitoring study was accompanied by computer modeling that estimated the risk of cancer from breathing toxic air pollution based on emissions and weather data. About 88 percent of the risk is attributed to emissions associated with mobile sources, with the remainder attributed to toxics emitted from stationary sources, which include large industrial operations, such as refineries and metal processing facilities, as well as smaller businesses such as gas stations and chrome plating facilities (page ES-12). The results indicate that 4 South Coast Air Quality Management District, MATES-V Study. https://www.agmd.gov/home/air-quality/air- quality-studies/health-studies/mates-v Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 7 18-653 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 diesel PM is the largest contributor to air toxics risk, accounting on average for about 50 percent of the total risk (Figure ES-2). Regional (Southern California Association of Governments) SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties, and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG coordinates with various air quality and transportation stakeholders in Southern California to ensure compliance with the federal and state air quality requirements, including the Transportation Conformity Rule and other applicable federal, state, and air district laws and regulations. As the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the six -county Southern California region, SCAG is required by law to ensure that transportation activities "conform" to, and are supportive of, the goals of regional and state air quality plans to attain the NAAQS. In addition, SCAG is a co -producer, with the SCAQMD, of the transportation strategy and transportation control measure sections of the AQMP for the Air Basin. SCAG adopted the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) on September 23, 2020. The RTP/SCS aims to address the transportation and air quality impacts of 3.7 million additional residents, 1.6 additional households, and 1.6 million additional jobs from 2016 to 2045. The Plan calls for $639 billion in transportation investments and reducing VMT by 19 percent per capita from 2005 to 2035. The updated plan accommodates 21.3 percent growth in population from 2016 (3,933,800) to 2045 (4,771,300) and a 15.6 percent growth in jobs from 2016 (1,848,300) to 2045 (2,135,900). The regional plan projects several benefits: • Decreasing drive -along work commutes by three percent • Reducing per capita VMT by five percent and vehicle hours traveled per capita by nine percent • Increasing transit commuting by two percent • Reducing travel delay per capita by 26 percent • Creating 264,500 new jobs annually • Reducing greenfield development by 29 percent by focusing on smart growth • Locating six more percent household growth in High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs), which concentrate roadway repair investments, leverage transit and active transportation investments, reduce regional life cycle infrastructure costs, improve accessibility, create local jobs, and have the potential to improve public health and housing affordability. • Locating 15 percent more jobs in HQTAs • Reducing PM2.5 emissions by 4.1 percent • Reducing GHG emissions by 19 percent by 2035 Local (City of Santa Ana) City of Santa Ana General Plan Conservation Element, The Conservation Element of the City's 2022 General Plan sets forth the goals, objectives, and policies that guide the City's direction on air quality. The Conservation Element includes Goal CN-1 (Air Quality and Climate), which aims to "[p]rotect air resources, improve regional and local air quality, and minimize the impacts of climate change." It includes several policies germane to controlling criteria pollutant emissions from development projects: Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 8 18-654 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Policy CN-1.4: Development Standards. Support new development that meets or exceeds standards for energy -efficient building design and site planning. Policy CN-1.5: Sensitive Receptor Decisions. Study the impacts of stationary and non -stationary emission sources on existing and proposed sensitive uses and opportunities to minimize health and safety risks. Develop and adopt new regulations avoiding the siting of facilities that potentially emit increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries Policy CN-1.6: New and Infill Residential Development. Promote development that is mixed use, pedestrian friendly, transit oriented, and clustered around activity centers. Policy CN-1.7: Housing and Employment Opportunities. Improve the city's jobs/housing balance ratio by supporting development that provides housing and employment opportunities to enable people to live and work in Santa Ana. Policy CN-1.8: Promote Alternative Transportation. Promote use of alternate modes of transportation in the City of Santa Ana, including pedestrian, bicycling, public transportation, car sharing programs, and emerging technologies. Policy CN-14: Transportation Demand Management. Require and incentivize projects to incorporate transportation demand management techniques. Policy CN-17: Indoor Recreation. Encourage new development to provide indoor recreation space when located in areas with high levels of localized air pollution or if site is adjacent to freeways or heavy industrial uses. Existing Conditions Pollutants and Effects Air quality is defined by ambient air concentrations of seven specific pollutants identified by the USEPA to be of concern with respect to health and welfare of the general public. These specific pollutants, known as "criteria air pollutants," are defined as pollutants for which the federal and State governments have established ambient air quality standards, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations to protect public health. Criteria air pollutants include carbon monoxide (CO), ground -level ozone (03), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), particulate matter ten microns or less in diameter (PMto), particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb). The following descriptions of each criteria air pollutant and their health effects are based on information provided by the SCAQMD.5 Carbon Monoxide (CO). CO is primarily emitted from combustion processes and motor vehicles due to incomplete combustion of fuel. Elevated concentrations of CO weaken the heart's contractions and lower the amount of oxygen carried by the blood. It is especially dangerous for people with chronic heart disease. Inhalation of CO can cause nausea, dizziness, and headaches at moderate concentrations and can be fatal at high concentrations. 5 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2012 AQMP, December 7, 2012. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 9 18-655 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Ozone (03). 03 is a gas that is formed when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx)—both byproducts of internal combustion engine exhaust —undergo slow photochemical reactions in the presence of sunlight. 03 concentrations are generally highest during the summer months when direct sunlight, light wind, and warm temperature conditions are favorable. An elevated level of 03 irritates the lungs and breathing passages, causing coughing and pain in the chest and throat, thereby increasing susceptibility to respiratory infections and reducing the ability to exercise. Effects are more severe in people with asthma and other respiratory ailments. Long-term exposure may lead to scarring of lung tissue and may lower lung efficiency. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2). NO2 is a byproduct of fuel combustion and major sources include power plants, large industrial facilities, and motor vehicles. The principal form of nitrogen oxide produced by combustion is nitric oxide (NO), which reacts quickly to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO2 commonly called NOx. NO2 absorbs blue light and results in a brownish -red cast to the atmosphere and reduced visibility. NO2 also contributes to the formation of PM1o. Nitrogen oxides irritate the nose and throat, and increase one's susceptibility to respiratory infections, especially in people with asthma. The principal concern of NOx is as a precursor to the formation of ozone. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2). Sulfur oxides (SOx) are compounds of sulfur and oxygen molecules. SO2 is the pre- dominant form found in the lower atmosphere and is a product of burning sulfur or burning materials that contain sulfur. Major sources of SO2 include power plants, large industrial facilities, diesel vehicles, and oil -burning residential heaters. Emissions of sulfur dioxide aggravate lung diseases, especially bronchitis. It also constricts the breathing passages, especially in asthmatics and people involved in moderate to heavy exercise. SO2 potentially causes wheezing, shortness of breath, and coughing. High levels of particulates appear to worsen the effect of sulfur dioxide, and long-term exposures to both pollutants leads to higher rates of respiratory illness. Particulate Matter (PM,o and PM2.5). The human body naturally prevents the entry of larger particles into the body. However, small particles, with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 10 microns (PM,o), and even smaller particles with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), can enter the body and become trapped in the nose, throat, and upper respiratory tract. These small particulates can potentially aggravate existing heart and lung diseases, change the body's defenses against inhaled materials, and damage lung tissue. The elderly, children, and those with chronic lung or heart disease are most sensitive to PM10 and PM2.5. Lung impairment can persist for two to three weeks after exposure to high levels of particulate matter. Some types of particulates can become toxic after inhalation due to the presence of certain chemicals and their reaction with internal body fluids. Lead (Pb). Lead is emitted from industrial facilities and from the sanding or removal of old lead -based paint. Smelting or processing the metal is the primary source of lead emissions, which is primarily a regional pollutant. Lead affects the brain and other parts of the body's nervous system. Exposure to lead in very young children impairs the development of the nervous system, kidneys, and blood forming processes in the body. State -Only Criteria Pollutants Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 10 18-656 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Visibility -Reducing Particles. Deterioration of visibility is one of the most obvious manifestations of air pollution and plays a major role in the public's perception of air quality. Visibility reduction from air pollution is often due to the presence of sulfur and NOx, as well as PM. Sulfates (S042-). Sulfates are the fully oxidized ionic form of sulfur. Sulfates occur in combination with metal and/or hydrogen ions. In California, emissions of sulfur compounds occur primarily from the combustion of petroleum -derived fuels (e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel) that contain sulfur. This sulfur is oxidized during the combustion process and subsequently converted to sulfate compounds in the atmosphere. Effects of sulfate exposure at levels above the standard include a decrease in ventilatory function, aggravation of asthmatic symptoms, and an increased risk of cardio-pulmonary disease. Sulfates are particularly effective in degrading visibility, and, due to fact that they are usually acidic, can harm ecosystems and damage materials and property. Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S). H2S is a colorless gas with the odor of rotten eggs. It is formed during bacterial decomposition of sulfur -containing organic substances. Also, it can be present in sewer gas and some natural gas and can be emitted as the result of geothermal energy exploitation. Breathing H2S at levels above the state standard could result in exposure to a very disagreeable odor. Vinyl Chloride. Vinyl chloride is a colorless, flammable gas at ambient temperature and pressure. It is also highly toxic and is classified as a known carcinogen by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. At room temperature, vinyl chloride is a gas with a sickly -sweet odor that is easily condensed. However, it is stored at cooler temperatures as a liquid. Due to the hazardous nature of vinyl chloride to human health, there are no end products that use vinyl chloride in its monomer form. Vinyl chloride is a chemical intermediate, not a final product. It is an important industrial chemical chiefly used to produce polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The process involves vinyl chloride liquid fed to polymerization reactors where it is converted from a monomer to a polymer PVC. The final product of the polymerization process is PVC in either a flake or pellet form. Billions of pounds of PVC are sold on the global market each year. From its flake or pellet form, PVC is sold to companies that heat and mold the PVC into end products such as PVC pipe and bottles. Vinyl chloride emissions are historically associated primarily with landfills. Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) TACs refer to a diverse group of "non -criteria" air pollutants that can affect human health but have not had ambient air quality standards established for them. This is not because they are fundamentally different from the pollutants discussed above but because their effects tend to be local rather than regional. TACs are classified as carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic, where carcinogenic TACs can cause cancer and noncarcinogenic TAC can cause acute and chronic impacts to different target organ systems (e.g., eyes, respiratory, reproductive, developmental, nervous, and cardiovascular). CARB and OEHHA determine if a substance should be formally identified, or "listed," as a TAC in California. A complete list of these substances is maintained on CARB's website.6 Diesel particulate matter (DPM), which is emitted in the exhaust from diesel engines, was listed by the state as a TAC in 1998. DPM has historically been used as a surrogate measure of exposure for all 6 California Air Resources Board, Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List, www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm, last reviewed by CARB July 18, 2011. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 11 18-657 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 diesel exhaust emissions. DPM consists of fine particles (fine particles have a diameter less than 2.5 micrometer (pm)), including a subgroup of ultrafine particles (ultrafine particles have a diameter less than 0.1 tam). Collectively, these particles have a large surface area which makes them an excellent medium for absorbing organics. The visible emissions in diesel exhaust include carbon particles or "soot." Diesel exhaust also contains a variety of harmful gases and cancer -causing substances. Exposure to DPM may be a health hazard, particularly to children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may have other serious health problems. DPM levels and resultant potential health effects may be higher in close proximity to heavily traveled roadways with substantial truck traffic or near industrial facilities. According to CARB, DPM exposure may lead to the following adverse health effects: (1) aggravated asthma; (2) chronic bronchitis; (3) increased respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations; (4) decreased lung function in children; (5) lung cancer; and (6) premature deaths for people with heart or lung disease.',S Project Site The Project Site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (the Basin); named so because of its geographical formation is that of a basin, with the surrounding mountains trapping the air and its pollutants in the valleys or basins below. The 6,745-square-mile Basin includes all of Orange County and the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. It is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west; the San Gabriel, San Bernardino and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east; and the San Diego County line to the south. Ambient pollution concentrations recorded in the Orange County portion of the Basin are among the highest in the four counties comprising the Basin. USEPA has classified Orange County as a nonattainment area for 03, PM2.5, and lead. This classification denotes that the Basin does not meet the NAAQS for these pollutants. In addition, under the CCAA, Orange County is designated as a nonattainment area for 03, PMto, and PM2.5. The air quality within the Basin is primarily influenced by a wide range of emissions sources, such as dense population centers, heavy vehicular traffic, industry, and meteorology. Air pollutant emissions are generated in the local vicinity by stationary and area -wide sources, such as commercial activity, space and water heating, landscaping maintenance, consumer products, and mobile sources primarily consisting of automobile traffic. Air Pollution Climatology. The topography and climate of Southern California combine to make the Basin an area of high air pollution potential. During the summer months, a warm air mass frequently descends over the cool, moist marine layer produced by the interaction between the ocean's surface and the lowest layer of the atmosphere. The warm upper layer forms a cap over the cooler surface layer which inhibits the pollutants from dispersing upward. Light winds during the summer further limit ventilation. Additionally, abundant sunlight triggers photochemical reactions which produce 03 and the majority of particulate matter. Air Monitoring Data. The SCAQMD monitors air quality conditions at 38 source receptor areas (SRA) throughout the Basin. The Project Site is located in SCAQMD's Central Orange County receptor area. 7 California Air Resources Board, Overview: Diesel Exhaust and Health, www.arb.ca.gov/research/diesel/diesel- health.htm, last reviewed by CARB April 12, 2016. 8 California Air Resources Board, Fact Sheet: Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Assessment Study for the West Oakland Community: Preliminary Summary of Results, March 2008. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 12 City of Santa Ana Air Quality lv I.0I U C18 — 658 10/3/2023 July 2o2s Historical data from the area was used to characterize existing conditions in the vicinity of the Project area. Table 2 shows pollutant levels, State and federal standards, and the number of exceedances recorded in the area from 2019 through 2021. The one -hour State standard for 03 was exceeded twice during this three-year period. The federal standard was exceeded once in that same period. In addition, the daily State standard for PM,owas exceeded twice. The daily federal standard for PM2.5 was exceeded four times. CO and NO2 levels did not exceed the CAAQS from 2019 to 2021 for 1-hour (and 8-hour for CO). Table 2 Ambient Air Quality Data Pollutants and State and Federal Standards Maximum Concentrations and Frequencies of Exceedance Standards 2019 2020 2021 Ozone (03) Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppm) 0.0096 0.142 0.089 Days > 0.09 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 1 6 0 Days > 0.070 ppm (Federal 8-hour standard) 1 15 0 Carbon Monoxide (CO2) Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppm) 2.4 2.3 2.1 Days > 20 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 0 0 0 Maximum 8-hour Concentration (ppm) 1.3 1.8 1.5 Days > 9.0 ppm (State 8-hour standard) 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppm) 0.0594 0.0709 0.0671 Days > 0.18 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 0 0 0 PM10 Maximum 24-hour Concentration (pg/m3) 127 120 115 Days > 50 pg/m3 (State 24-hour standard) 13 13 12 PM2.5 Maximum 24-hour Concentration (pg/m3) 36.1 41.4 54.4 Days > 35 pg/m3 (Federal 24-hour standard) 3 1 9 Sulfur Dioxide (S02) Maximum 24-hour Concentration (ppb) N/A N/A N/A Days > 0.04 ppm (State 24-hour standard) N/A N/A N/A ppm = parts by volume per million of air. pg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter. N/A = not available at this monitoring station. Source: SCAQMD annual monitoring data at Central Orange County subregion (http://www.agmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data- studies/historical-data-by-year) accessed July 26, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 13 18 — 659 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Existing Health Risk in the Surrounding Area. Based on the MATES-V model, the calculated cancer risk in the Project area (zip code 92705) is approximately 416 in a million.9 The cancer risk in this area is predominately related to nearby sources of diesel particulate matter (e.g., diesel trucks and traffic on the northbound mainline of the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5) 750 feet to the west). In general, the risk at the Project Site is higher than 37 percent of the population across the South Coast Air Basin. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, on behalf of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA), provides a screening tool called CalEnviroScreen that can be used to help identify California communities disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution. According to CalEnviroScreen, the Project Site (Census tract 6059075403) is located in the 71st percentile, which means the Project Site has an overall environmental pollution burden higher than at least 71 percent of other communities within California.10 Sensitive Receptors. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to changes in air quality than others, depending on the population groups and the activities involved. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has identified the following groups who are most likely to be affected by air pollution: children less than 14 years of age, the elderly over 65 years of age, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. According to the SCAQMD, sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes. The Project Site is located on the Fourth Street corridor, which is populated with a mix of residential, retail, and commercial uses near the Project Site. Sensitive receptors within 0.25 miles of the Project Site include, but are not limited to, the following representative sampling: • Cabrillo Park, 1820 East Fruit Street; directly north of the Project Site. • Residences, 724 North Parkcenter Drive; 80 feet northeast of the Project Site • Residences, 618 Sherry Lane; 400 feet west of the Project Site. • Residences, 1901 East First Street; 450 feet south of the Project Site. Existing Project Site Emissions. The Project Site is improved with four commercial buildings totaling 173,025 square feet and 617 surface parking spaces. As summarized in Table 3, most existing air quality emissions are associated with the 1,876 daily vehicle trips traveling to and from the Project Site.11 Table 3 Existing Daily Operations Emissions Daily Emissions (Pounds Per Day) Emissions Source I vOC I NOx I CO I SOx PM10 PM2.5 9 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin (MATES-V), MATES V Interactive Carcinogenicity Map, 2021, https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/79d3b6304912414bb2l ebdde80100b23/page/home/?data_id=data Source _105-a5ba9580e3aa43508a793fac819a5a4d%3A26&views=view_39%2Cview_1, accessed July 20, 2023. 10 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40, accessed July 20, 2023. 11 Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 14 City of Santa Ana Air Quality 1v W I 18 — 660 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 3 Existing Daily Operations Emissions Area Sources 5.4 0.1 7.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Energy Sources Mobile Sources 0.1 6.9 1.2 5.7 1.0 62.9 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 13.4 3.5 Regional Total 12.3 7.0 71.4 0.2 13.5 3.6 Source: DKA Planning, 2023 based on CaIEEMod 2022.1.1.14 model runs, Summer season (included in Project Impacts Methodology The air quality analysis conducted for the Project is consistent with the methods described in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993 edition), as well as the updates to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, as provided on the SCAQMD website. The SCAQMD recommends the use of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod, version 2022.1.1.14) as a tool for quantifying emissions of air pollutants that will be generated by constructing and operating development projects. The analyses focus on the potential change in air quality conditions due to Project implementation. Air pollutant emissions would result from both construction and operation of the Project. Specific methodologies used to evaluate these emissions are discussed below. Construction. Sources of air pollutant emissions associated with construction activities include heavy- duty off -road diesel equipment and vehicular traffic to and from the Project construction site. Project - specific information was provided describing the schedule of construction activities and the equipment inventory required from the Applicant. Details pertaining to the schedule and equipment can be found in the Technical Appendix to this analysis. The CaIEEMod model provides default values for daily equipment usage rates and worker trip lengths, as well as emission factors for heavy-duty equipment, passenger vehicles, and haul trucks that have been derived by the CARB. Maximum daily emissions were quantified for each construction activity based on the number of equipment and daily hours of use, in addition to vehicle trips to and from the Project Site. The SCAQMD recommends that air pollutant emissions be assessed for both regional scale and localized impacts. The regional emissions analysis includes both on -site and off -site sources of emissions, while the localized emissions analysis focuses only on sources of emissions that would be located on the Project Site. Localized impacts were analyzed in accordance with the SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold (LST) methodology. 12 The localized effects from on -site portion of daily emissions were evaluated at sensitive receptor locations potentially impacted by the Project according to the SCAQMD's LST methodology, which uses on -site mass emission look -up tables and Project -specific modeling, where appropriate.13 SCAQMD provides LSTs applicable to the following criteria pollutants: NOx, CO, PM10, 12 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final Localized Significance Methodology, revised July 2008. 13 South Coast Air Quality Management District, LST Methodology Appendix C-Mass Rate LST Look -Up Table, October 2009. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE15 18-661 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 and PM2.5. SCAQMD does not provide an LST for S02 since land use development projects typically result in negligible construction and long-term operation emissions of this pollutant. Since VOCs are not a criteria pollutant, there is no ambient standard or SCAQMD LST for VOCs. Due to the role VOCs play in 03formation, it is classified as a precursor pollutant, and only a regional emissions threshold has been established. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard and are developed based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each source receptor area and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. The mass rate look -up tables were developed for each source receptor area and can be used to determine whether or not a project may generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts. SCAQMD provides LST mass rate look -up tables for projects with active construction areas that are less than or equal to five acres. If the project exceeds the LST look -up values, then the SCAQMD recommends that project -specific air quality modeling must be performed. Please refer to Threshold b below, for the analysis of localized impacts from on -site construction activities. In accordance with SCAQMD guidance, maximum daily emissions of NOx, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5 from on - site sources during each construction activity were compared to LST values for a five -acre site having sensitive receptors within 25 meters (82 feet).14This is appropriate given the 8.97-acre site and the proximity of sensitive receptors immediately north of the Project Site. The Basin is divided into 38 SRAs, each with its own set of maximum allowable LST values for on -site emissions sources during construction and operations based on locally monitored air quality. Maximum on -site emissions resulting from construction activities were quantified and assessed against the applicable LST values. The significance criteria and analysis methodologies in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook were used in evaluating impacts in the context of the CEQA significance criteria listed below. The SCAQMD localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for NO2i CO, and PM10 were initially published in June 2003 and revised in July 2008.15 The LSTs for PM2.5 were established in October 2006.16 Updated LSTs were published on the SCAQMD website on October 21, 2009.17 Table 4 presents the significance criteria for both construction and operational emissions. 14 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Fact Sheet for Applying CaIEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds, 2008. 15 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Fact Sheet for Applying CaIEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds, 2008. 16 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final — Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 and PM 2.5 Significance Thresholds, October 2006. 17 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology Appendix C — Mass Rate LST Look -Up Tables, October 21, 2009. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 16 City of Santa Ana Air Quality Iv, `I.0I u C18 — 662 10/3/2023 July 2o2s Table 4 SCAQMD Emissions Thresholds Criteria Pollutant Construction Emissions Operation Emissions Regional Localized /a/ Regional Localized /a/ Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 75 -- 55 -- Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 100 183 55 183 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 1,253 550 1,253 Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 150 -- 150 -- Respirable Particulates (PM10) 150 13 150 3 Fine Particulates (PM2.5) 55 7 55 2 /a/ Localized significance thresholds assumed a five -acre and 25-meter (82-foot) receptor distance in the Central Orange County source receptor area. The SCAQMD has not developed LST values for VOC or SOX. Pursuant to SCAQMD guidance, sensitive receptors closer than 25 meters to a construction site are to use the LSTs for receptors at 25 meters (SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, June 2008). Source: SCAQMD, South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, 2019 Operations. CaIEEMod also generates estimates of daily and annual emissions of air pollutants resulting from future operation of a project. Operational emissions of air pollutants are produced by mobile sources (vehicular travel) and stationary sources (utilities demand). Utilities for the Project Site are provided by Southern California Edison (SCE) for electricity and Southern California Gas for natural gas. CalEEMod has derived default emissions factors for electricity and natural gas usage that are applied to the size and land use type of the Project in question. CaIEEMod also generates estimated operational emissions associated water use, wastewater generation, and solid waste disposal. Similar to construction, SCAQMD's CaIEEMod software was used for the evaluation of Project emissions during operation. CalEEMod was used to calculate on -road fugitive dust, architectural coatings, landscape equipment, energy use, mobile source, and stationary source emissions.18 To determine if a significant air quality impact would occur, the net increase in regional and local operational emissions generated by the Project was compared against the SCAQMD's significance thresholds.19 Details describing the operational emissions of the Project can be found in in the Technical Appendix. Toxic Air Contaminants Impacts (Construction and Operations). Potential TAC impacts are evaluated by conducting a qualitative analysis consistent with the CARB Handbook followed by a more detailed analysis (i.e., dispersion modeling), as necessary. The qualitative analysis consists of reviewing the Project to identify any new or modified TAC emissions sources. If the qualitative evaluation does not rule out significant impacts from a new source, or modification of an existing TAC emissions source, a more detailed analysis is conducted. 18 Energy consumption estimates with CaIEEMod 2022.1.1.14 are based on the California Energy Commission's 2020 Residential Appliance Saturation Survey (residential uses) and 2021 Commercial Forecast database, both of which reflected the 2019 Title 24 energy efficiency standards. These energy consumption estimates were adjusted to reflect the 2022 Title 24 standards that cumulatively produce a 0.49 percent reduction in electricity use and 0.45 percent reduction in natural gas use when compared to the 2019 standards. 19 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Significance Thresholds, revised March 2015. SCAQMD based these thresholds, in part on the federal Clean Air Act and, to enable defining "significant" for CEQA purposes, defined the setting as the South Coast Air Basin. (See SCAQMD, CCEE ,�A Air uality Handbook, April 1993, pp. 6-1-6-2). Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 17 City of Santa Ana Air Quality liV touriCl 18 - 663 10/3/2023 July 2023 Thresholds of Significance State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Would the Project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard; c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? City and SCAQMD Thresholds For this analysis the Appendix G Thresholds are relied upon. The analysis utilizes factors and considerations recommended by the City of Santa Ana and SCAQMD Thresholds, as appropriate, to assist in answering the Appendix G Threshold questions. (a) Construction The City recommends that determination of significance be made on a case -by -case basis, considering the following criteria to evaluate construction -related air emissions: (i) Combustion Emissions from Construction Equipment • Type, number of pieces and usage for each type of construction equipment; • Estimated fuel usage and type of fuel (diesel, natural gas) for each type of equipment; and • Emission factors for each type of equipment. (ii) Fugitive Dust —Grading, Excavation and Hauling • Amount of soil to be disturbed on -site or moved off -site; • Emission factors for disturbed soil; • Duration of grading, excavation and hauling activities; • Type and number of pieces of equipment to be used; and • Projected haul route. (iii) Fugitive Dust —Heavy -Duty Equipment Travel on Unpaved Road • Length and type of road; • Type, number of pieces, weight and usage of equipment; and • Type of soil. (iv) Other Mobile Source Emissions Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 18 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 • Number and average length of construction worker trips to Project Site, per day; and • Duration of construction activities. In addition, the following criteria set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook serve as quantitative air quality standards to be used to evaluate project impacts under the Appendix G Thresholds. Under these thresholds, a significant threshold would occur when:20 • Regional emissions from both direct and indirect sources would exceed any of the following SCAQMD prescribed threshold levels: (1) 100 pounds per day for NOx; (2) 75 pounds a day for VOC; (3) 150 pounds per day for PM10 or SOx; (4) 55 pounds per day for PM2.5; and (5) 550 pounds per day for CO. • Maximum on -site daily localized emissions exceed the LST, resulting in predicted ambient concentrations in the vicinity of the Project Site greater than the most stringent ambient air quality standards for CO (20 ppm [23,000 pg/m3] over a 1-hour period or 9.0 ppm [10,350 pg/m3] averaged over an 8-hour period) and NO2 (0.18 ppm [339 pg/m3] over a 1-hour period, 0.1 ppm [188 pg/m3] over a three-year average of the 98th percentile of the daily maximum 1-hour average, or 0.03 ppm [57 pg/m3] averaged over an annual period). • Maximum on -site localized PM10 or PM2.5 emissions during construction exceed the applicable LSTs, resulting in predicted ambient concentrations in the vicinity of the Project Site to exceed the incremental 24-hour threshold of 10.4 pg/m3 or 1.0 pg/m3 PM10 averaged over an annual period. (b) Operation The City bases the determination of significance of operational air quality impacts on criteria set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook.21 As discussed above, the City uses Appendix G as the thresholds of significance for this analysis. Accordingly, the following serve as quantitative air quality standards to be used to evaluate project impacts under the Appendix G thresholds. Under these thresholds, a significant threshold would occur when: • Operational emissions exceed 10 tons per year of volatile organic gases or any of the following SCAQMD prescribed threshold levels: (1) 55 pounds a day for VOC;ZZ (2) 55 pounds per day for NOx; (3) 550 pounds per day for CO; (4) 150 pounds per day for SOx; (5) 150 pounds per day for PM10; and (6) 55 pounds per day for PM2.5.23 • Maximum on -site daily localized emissions exceed the LST, resulting in predicted ambient concentrations in the vicinity of the Project Site greater than the most stringent ambient air quality standards for CO (20 parts per million (ppm) over a 1-hour period or 9.0 ppm averaged over an 20 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Significance Thresholds, revised March 2015. 21 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Significance Thresholds, revised March 2015. 22 For purposes of this analysis, emissions of VOC and reactive organic compounds (ROG) are used interchangeably since ROG represents approximately 99.9 percent of VOC emissions. 23 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Quality Significance Thresholds, www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf, last updated March 2015. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 19 City of Santa Ana Air Quality 1 V ouE 18 — 665 10/3/2023 July 2023 8-hour period) and NO2 (0.18 ppm over a 1-hour period, 0.1 ppm over a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of the daily maximum 1-hour average, or 0.03 ppm averaged over an annual period).24 • Maximum on -site localized operational PM10 and PM2.5 emissions exceed the incremental 24- hour threshold of 2.5 tag/m3 or 1.0 pg/m3 PM10 averaged over an annual period.25 • The Project causes or contributes to an exceedance of the California 1-hour or 8-hour CO standards of 20 or 9.0 ppm, respectively; or • The Project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402. (c) Toxic Air Contaminants The City recommends that the determination of significance shall be made on a case -by -case basis, considering the following criteria to evaluate TACs: • Would the project use, store, or process carcinogenic or non -carcinogenic toxic air contaminants which could result in airborne emissions? In assessing impacts related to TACs in this section, the City uses Appendix G as the thresholds of significance. The criteria identified above will be used where applicable and relevant to assist in analyzing the Appendix G thresholds. In addition, the following criteria set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook serve as quantitative air quality standards to be used to evaluate project impacts under Appendix G thresholds. Under these thresholds, a significant threshold would occur when:26 • The Project results in the exposure of sensitive receptors to carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants that exceed the maximum incremental cancer risk of 10 in one million or an acute or chronic hazard index of 1.0.27 For projects with a maximum incremental cancer risk between 1 in one million and 10 in one million, a project would result in a significant impact if the cancer burden exceeds 0.5 excess cancer cases. (d) Consistency with Applicable Air Quality Plans CEQA Guidelines Section 15125 requires an analysis of project consistency with applicable governmental plans and policies. This analysis is conducted to assess potential project impacts against 24 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, revised July 2008. 25 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final —Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 and PM2.5 Significance Thresholds, October 2006. 26 South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993, Chapter 6 (Determining the Air Quality Significance of a Project) and Chapter 10 (Assessing Toxic Air Pollutants). 27 Hazard index is the ratio of a toxic air contaminant's concentration divided by its Reference Concentration, or safe exposure level. If the hazard index exceeds one, people are exposed to levels of TACs that may pose noncancer health risks. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 20 City of Santa Ana Air Quality �v I.oI u C18 — 666 10/3/2023 July 2o2s Threshold (a) from the Appendix G thresholds. In accordance with the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Qualify Handbook, the following criteria are used to evaluate a project's consistency with the AQMP:28 • Will the Project result in any of the following: - An increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations; - Cause or contribute to new air quality violations; or - Delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP? • Will the Project exceed the assumptions utilized in preparing the AQMP? - Is the Project consistent with the population and employment growth projections upon which AQMP forecasted emission levels are based; - Does the Project include air quality mitigation measures; or - To what extent is Project development consistent with the AQMP land use policies? The Project's impacts with respect to these criteria are discussed to assess the consistency with the SCAQMD's AQMP and SCAG regional plans and policies. In addition, the Project's consistency with the City of Santa Ana General Plan Conservation Element is discussed. Project Design Features. The Project would comply with the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen, effective January 1, 2023).29 Further energy efficiency and sustainability features would include native plants and drip/subsurface irrigation systems, individual metering or sub metering for water use, leak detection systems, and electric vehicle charging capacity. The Project's infill location would promote the concentration of development in an urban location with extensive infrastructure and access to public transit facilities. The Project's proximity to public transportation would reduce vehicle miles traveled for residents and visitors who want options to driving cars. Analysis of Project Impacts a. Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project's air quality emissions would not exceed any state or federal standards. Therefore, the Project would not increase the frequency or severity of an existing violation or cause or contribute to new violations for these pollutants. As the Project would not exceed any of the state and federal standards, the Project would also not delay timely attainment of air quality standards or interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. With respect to the determination of consistency with AQMP growth assumptions, the projections in the AQMP for achieving air quality goals are based on assumptions in SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS regarding population, housing, and growth trends. Determining whether or not a project exceeds the 28 South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993, p. 12-3. 29 California Building Codes: http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Codes.aspx. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac r—ka PAGE 21 18 - 667 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 assumptions reflected in the AQMP involves the evaluation of three criteria: (1) consistency with applicable population, housing, and employment growth projections; (2) project mitigation measures; and (3) appropriate incorporation of AQMP land use planning strategies. The following discussion provides an analysis with respect to each of these three criteria. • Is the project consistent with the population, housing, and employment growth projections upon which AQMP forecasted emission levels are based? A project is consistent with the AQMP, in part, if it is consistent with the population, housing, and employment assumptions that were used in the development of the AQMP. In the case of the 2022 AQMP, two sources of data form the basis for the projections of air pollutant emissions: the City of Santa Ana General Plan and SCAG's RTP. The General Plan serves as a comprehensive, long-term plan for future development of the City. The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS provides socioeconomic forecast projections of regional population growth. The population, housing, and employment forecasts, which are adopted by SCAG's Regional Council, are based on local plans and policies applicable to the specific area; these are used by SCAG in all phases of implementation and review. The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS accommodates 360,100 persons; 80,100 households; and 172,400 jobs in the City of Santa Ana by 2045. Based on SCAG's average 2016 persons -per -household rate for the City of 4.6 persons per household,30 the Project would add a net residential population of approximately 2,334 people to the Project Site based on the 507 dwelling units proposed. The Project's residential population would represent approximately 11.7 percent of the forecast population growth between 2016 and 2045. Development of the Project also would result in the removal of about 542 on -site jobs based on the 173,025 square feet of general office uses.31 Thus, the Project's estimated employment impact would not help produce job growth that exceeds the capacity that is accommodated in the 2022 AQMP. As a result, the Project would be consistent with the projections in the AQMP. • Does the project implement feasible air quality mitigation measures? As discussed below under Thresholds (b), (c), and (d), the Project would not result in any significant air quality impacts and therefore would not require mitigation. In addition, the Project would comply with all applicable regulatory standards as required by SCAQMD. Furthermore, with compliance with the regulatory requirements identified above, no significant air quality impacts would occur. As such, the proposed Project meets this AQMP consistency criterion. • To what extent is project development consistent with the land use policies set forth in the AQMP? 30 Southern California Association of Governments; Final Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction; https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and- g rowth-forecast. pdf? 1606001579. 31 Prepared by The Natelson Company, Inc. for the Southern California Association of Governments, Employment Density Study Summary Report; October 2001. Assumes 319 square feet average per general office (low-rise) employee. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 22 City of Santa Ana Air Quality 1v ONC1 18 — 668 10/3/2023 July 2023 With regard to land use developments such as the Project, the AQMP's air quality policies focus on the reduction of vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The Project would serve to implement a number of land use policies of the City of Santa Ana, SCAQMD, and SCAG. The Project would be designed and constructed to support and promote environmental sustainability. The Project represents an infill development within an existing urbanized area that would concentrate more housing and population within a high quality transit area (HQTA). "Green" principles are incorporated throughout the Project to comply with the Green Building Code and the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) through energy conservation, water conservation, and waste reduction features. The air quality plan applicable to the Project area is the 2022 AQMP, the current management plan for progression toward compliance with State and federal clean air requirements. The Project would be required to comply with all regulatory measures set forth by the SCAQMD. Implementation of the Project would not interfere with air pollution control measures listed in the 2022 AQMP. In addition, as demonstrated in the following analyses, the Project would not result in significant emissions that would jeopardize regional or localized air quality standards. The Project Site is classified as "District Center" (Medium High DC-3) in the General Plan, a classification that allows mixed -use residential, retail, and commercial development at a 3.0 Floor Area Ratio such as that proposed by the Project.32 As such, the RTP/SCS' assumptions about growth in the City accommodate population, housing, and job growth on the Project Site. As a result, the Project would be consistent with the growth assumptions in the City's General Plan. Because the AQMP accommodates growth forecasts from local General Plans, the emissions associated with this Project are accounted for and mitigated in the region's air quality attainment plans. The air quality impacts of development on the Project Site are accommodated in the region's emissions inventory for the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS and 2022 AQMP. Therefore, Project impacts with respect to AQMP consistency would be less than significant. City of Santa Ana Policies The Project would offer convenient access to public transit and opportunities for walking and biking (including the provision of bicycle parking), thereby facilitating a reduction in VMT. In addition, the Project would be consistent with the existing land use pattern in the vicinity that concentrates urban density along major arterials and near transit options based on the following: • The Project Site is within a HQTA, which reflects areas with rail transit service or bus service where lines have peak headways of less than 15 minutes.33 • The Project is considered a Transit Priority Project under SB 375, as it contains at least 50 percent residential uses, with a minimum net density of at least 20 dwelling units per acre, and is within 0.5 miles of a major transit stop. • Local public transit service in the area includes: 32 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/05/May_2023_General_Plan_Land_Use _Element.pdf. 33 Southern California Association of Governments Data Portal https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file- attachments/0903fconnectsocal_active-transportation.pdf? 1606001530, Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 23 City of Santa Ana Air Quality 1V ` ONC1 18 — 669 10/3/2023 July 2023 o Orange County Transportation Authority Line 64, which runs east -west along First Street, connecting the Westminster Mall to the City of Tustin. The nearest bus stop is on 1st Street near Golden Circle Drive, approximately 900 feet south of the Project Site. o Orange County Transportation Authority Line 71, which runs north -south near the Project Site along Tustin Avenue, with the nearest bus stop at 4t" Street, approximately 1,400 feet east of the Project Site. o Santa Ana Metrolink station, approximately 4,900 feet west of the Project Site. This station accesses the Orange County and Inland Empire -Orange County lines. The City's General Plan Conservation Element identifies seven policies with strategies for advancing the City's clean air goals that are applicable directly or indirectly to development projects. As illustrated in Table 5, the Project is consistent with the applicable policies in the Conservation Element, as the Project would implement sustainability features that would reduce vehicular trips, reduce VMT, and encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. Therefore, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to consistency with the Conservation Element. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 24 18 — 670 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Project Consistency with City of Santa Ana General Plan Conservation Element Strategy Project Consistency Consistent. While the policy calls for the City to Policy : Development Standards. promote energy -efficient design and site planning, the Supportt nnewew development that meets or Project's site plan sets back housing from the Santa Ana exceeds standards for energy -efficient building Freeway and Fourth Street to maximize the buffer zone design and site planning. from these sources of vehicular emissions. Policy CN-1.5: Sensitive Receptor Decisions. Consistent. While the policy calls for the City to Study the impacts of stationary and non- promote land use planning that protects sensitive stationary emission sources on existing and receptors from air quality impacts, the Project's site plan proposed sensitive uses and opportunities to sets back housing from the Santa Ana Freeway and minimize health and safety risks. Develop and Fourth Street to maximize the buffer zone from these adopt new regulations avoiding the siting of sources of vehicular emissions. It should be noted that facilities that potentially emit increased pollution the Project lies outside the 24 census tracts in the City near sensitive receptors within environmental that are considered environmental justice justice area boundaries. communities.34 Consistent. The Proposed Project is located in an infill Policy CN-1.6: New and Infill Residential location and would redevelop slow -density office park Development. Promote development that is with needed housing supply that is located near major mixed use, pedestrian friendly, transit oriented, activity centers along 1st Street and 41h Street, with and clustered around activity centers. access to the Santa Ana Metrolink Station. Consistent. The Proposed Project is located would Policy CN-1.7: Housing and Employment improve the supply of housing along the Fourth Street Opportunities. Improve the city's jobs/housing corridor, which is largely flanked by commercial. Uses balance ratio by supporting development that and provides both local and Citywide balance between. provides housing and employment opportunities Housing and jobs. The Project also increases the to enable people to live and work in Santa Ana. diversity of housing options, with studio units, townhomes, and live/work units. Policy CN-1.8: Promote Alternative Consistent. The Proposed Project would include short - Transportation. Promote use of alternate modes and long-term bicycle parking for residents and the of transportation in the City of Santa Ana, commercial tenants. The Project would also provide 81 including pedestrian, bicycling, public electric vehicle charging stations for residents and transportation, car sharing programs, and another nine for guests. emerging technologies. Policy CN-14: Transportation Demand Consistent. The Proposed Project would include short - Management. Require and incentivize projects and long-term bicycle parking for residents and the to incorporate transportation demand commercial tenants. management techniques. Consistent. As the Project Site is 750 feet east of the Policy CN-17: Indoor Recreation. Encourage Santa Ana Freeway, its site plan includes an indoor club new development to provide indoor recreation room, indoor fitness room, as well as outdoor pools space when located in areas with high levels of located in central courtyards that are both set back from localized air pollution or if site is adjacent to the freeway and shielded by the internal buildings on the freeways or heavy industrial uses. Project Site. Source: DKA Planning, 2023. 34 City of Santa Ana, Environmental Justice Community Maps; https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/04/Environmental-Justice-Communities- Map_20211015v2.pdf, Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 25 18-671 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction A cumulatively considerable net increase would occur if the project's construction impacts substantially contribute to air quality violations when considering other projects that may undertake construction activities at the same time. Individual projects that generate emissions that do not exceed SCAQMD's significance thresholds would not contribute considerably to any potential cumulative impact. SCAQMD neither recommends quantified analyses of the emissions generated by a set of cumulative development projects nor provides thresholds of significance to assess the impacts associated with these emissions.35 Construction -related emissions were estimated using the SCAQMD's CalEEMod 2022.1.1.14 model and a projected construction schedule of at least 36 months. Table 5 summarizes the estimated construction schedule that was modeled for air quality impacts. Table 6 Construction Schedule Assumptions Phase Duration Notes Removal of 6,000 tons of demolition debris in 10-cubic yard Demolition Months 1-2 capacity trucks, hauled up to 20 miles to the Olinda Alpha Landfill. Site Preparation Month 3 (one Grubbing and removal of trees, plants, landscaping, weeds week) over a 64,000 square -foot area Grading Months 3-5 Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil hauled 20 miles to Olinda Alpha Landfill in 14-cubic yard capacity trucks. Trenching Months 6-8 Trenching for utilities, including gas, water, electricity, and telecommunications. Paving Months 9-11 Flatwork, including paving of driveways and walkways Footings and foundation work (e.g., pouring concrete pads), Building Construction Months 12- framing, welding; installing mechanical, electrical, and 36 plumbing. Floor assembly, cabinetry and carpentry, elevator installations, low voltage systems, trash management. Architectural Coatings Months 33- Application of interior and exterior coatings and sealants. 36 Source: DKA Planning, 2023. 35 South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003 White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution: "As Lead Agency, the AQMD uses the same significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or EIR... Projects that exceed the project -specific significance threshold are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason project -specific and cumulative thresholds are the same. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project -specific thresholds are not considered to be cumulatively significant. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 26 City of Santa Ana Air Quality Ivtour C 18 — 672 10/3/20233U1y2o23 The Project would be required to comply with the following regulations, as applicable: • SCAQMD Rule 403, would reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in ambient air as a result of anthropogenic fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust emissions. • SCAQMD Rule 1113, which limits the VOC content of architectural coatings. • SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that a person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other materials which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. • In accordance with Section 2485 in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, the idling of all diesel -fueled commercial vehicles (with gross vehicle weight over 10,000 pounds) during construction would be limited to five minutes at any location. • In accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, operation of any stationary, diesel -fueled, compression -ignition engines would meet specific fuel and fuel additive requirements and emissions standards. Regional Emissions Construction activity creates air quality impacts through the use of heavy-duty construction equipment and through vehicle trips generated by construction workers traveling to and from the Project Site. NOx emissions would primarily result from the use of construction equipment and truck trips. Fugitive dust emissions would peak during grading activities, where approximately 400 cubic yards of soil would be exported from the Project Site. All construction projects in the Basin must comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for fugitive dust. Rule 403 control requirements include measures to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes. Measures include, but are not limited to, applying water and/or soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system or other control measures to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the Project Site, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. Compliance with Rule 403 would reduce regional PM2.5 and PM10 emissions associated with construction activities by approximately 61 percent. During the building finishing phase, the application of architectural coatings (e.g., paints) would release VOCs (regulated by SCAQMD Rule 1113). The assessment of construction air quality impacts considers each of these potential sources. Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of operation and, for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. As shown in Table 7, construction of the Project would produce VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM,o and PM emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's regional thresholds. As a result, construction of the ProjeU Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 27 18 — 673 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 would not contribute substantially to an existing violation of air quality standards for regional pollutants (e.g., ozone). This impact is considered less than significant. Localized Emissions In addition to maximum daily regional emissions, maximum localized (on -site) emissions were quantified for each construction activity. The localized construction air quality analysis was conducted using the methodology promulgated by the SCAQMD. Look -up tables provided by the SCAQMD were used to determine localized construction emissions thresholds for the Project.36 LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard and are based on the most recent background ambient air quality monitoring data (2019-2021) for the Project area. Table 7 Daily Construction Emissions Daily Emissions (Pounds Per Day) Construction Phase Year VOC NOx CO sox PM10 PM2.5 2024 3.8 38.6 34.9 0.1 10.0 5.6 2025 3.3 29.8 44.1 0.1 8.3 2.6 2026 2.9 15.5 42.3 0.1 8.2 2.2 2027 63.2 15.7 46.7 0.1 9.6 2.5 Maximum Regional Total 63.2 38.6 46.7 0.1 10.0 5.6 Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Maximum Localized Total 57.5 33.0 21.7 0.1 4.1 1.8 Localized Threshold N/A 183 1,253 N/A 13 7 Exceed Threshold? N/A No No N/A No No The construction dates are used for the modeling of air quality emissions in the CaIEEMod software. If construction activities commence later than what is assumed in the environmental analysis, the actual emissions would be lower than analyzed because of the increasing penetration of newer equipment with lower certified emission levels. Assumes implementation of SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust Emissions) Source: DKA Planning, 2023 based on CaIEEMod 2022.1.1.14 model runs. LST analyses based on five -acre site with 25-meter distances to receptors in Central Orange County source receptor area. Estimates reflect the peak summer or winter season, whichever is higher. Totals may not add up due to rounding. Modeling sheets included in the Technical Appendix. Maximum on -site daily construction emissions for NOx, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5 were calculated using CaIEEMod and compared to the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for the Central Orange County SRA based on construction site acreage that is five acres in area, the highest site area identified by SCAQMD for their LSTs. Potential impacts were evaluated at the closest off -site sensitive receptor, which is Cabrillo 36 South Coast Air Quality Management District, LST Methodology Appendix C-Mass Rate LST Look -up Table, revised October 2009. Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 28 18-674 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Park immediately north of the Project Site. The closest receptor distance on the SCAQMD mass rate LST look -up tables is 25 meters. As shown in Table 7, above, the Project would produce emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's recommended localized standards of significance for NO2 and CO during the construction phase. Similarly, construction activities would not produce PMto and PM2.5 emissions that exceed localized thresholds recommended by the SCAQMD. These estimates assume the use of Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) that address fugitive dust emissions of PMto and PM2.5through SCAQMD Rule 403. This would include watering portions of the site that are disturbed during grading activities and minimizing tracking of dirt onto local streets. Therefore, construction impacts on localized air quality are considered less than significant. Operation Operational emissions of criteria pollutants would come from area, energy, and mobile sources. Area sources include consumer products such as household cleaners, architectural coatings for routine maintenance, and landscaping equipment. Energy sources include electricity and natural gas use for space cooling and heating and water heating.37 The CalEEMod program generates estimates of emissions from energy use based on the land use type and size. The Project would also produce long- term air quality impacts to the region primarily from motor vehicles that access the Project Site. The Project could add up to 875 net vehicle trips to the local roadway network on a weekday at the start of operations in 2027, considering the removal of the existing commercial auto center.38 As shown in Table 8, the Project's emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD's regional or localized significance thresholds. Therefore, the operational impacts of the Project on regional and localized air quality are considered less than significant. c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. There are several sensitive receptors within 0.25 miles of the Project Site that could be exposed to air pollution from construction and operation of the Project, including, but are not limited to, the following representative sampling: • Cabrillo Park, 1820 East Fruit Street; directly north of the Project Site. • Residences, 724 North Parkcenter Drive; 80 feet northeast of the Project Site • Residences, 618 Sherry Lane; 400 feet west of the Project Site. • Residences, 1901 East First Street; 450 feet south of the Project Site. 37 When electricity is used in buildings or local developments, electricity generation typically takes place offsite at power plants. 38 Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 29 City of Santa Ana Air Quality lvtour%I 18 — 675 10/3/20233U1y2o2s Table 8 Daily Operations Emissions Emissions Source Area Sources Daily Emissions (Pounds Per Day) VOC 28.6 NOx 0.6 CO 45.2 Sox PM10 PM2.5 <0.1 0.1 0.1 Energy Sources 0.1 1.7 0.8 <0.1 0.1 0.1 Mobile Sources 8.5 6.3 74.9 0.2 19.6 5.1 Regional Total 37.2 8.6 121.0 0.2 19.8 5.2 Existing Total -12.3 -7.0 -71.4 -0.2 -13.5 -3.6 Net Regional Total 24.9 1.6 49.6 <0.1 6.3 1.6 Regional Significance Threshold Exceed Threshold? 55 No 55 No 550 No 150 150 55 No No No Net Localized Total 28.7 2.3 46.0 <0.1 0.2 0.2 Localized Significance Threshold N/A 183 1,253 N/A 3 2 Exceed Threshold? N/A No No N/A No No LST analyses based on five -acre site with 25-meter distances to receptors in Central Orange County SRA Source: DKA Planning, 2023 based on CaIEEMod 2022.1.1.14 model runs (included in the Technical Appendix). Totals reflect the summer season maximum and may not add up due to rounding. Construction Construction of the Project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations if maximum daily emissions of regulated pollutants generated by sources located on and/or near the Project Site exceeded the applicable LST values presented in Table 4, or if construction activities generated significant emissions of TACs that could result in carcinogenic risks or non -carcinogenic hazards exceeding the SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds of 10 excess cancers per million or non -carcinogenic Hazard Index greater than 1.0, respectively. As discussed above, the LST values were derived by the SCAQMD forthe criteria pollutants NOx, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5 to prevent the occurrence of concentrations exceeding the air quality standards at sensitive receptor locations based on proximity and construction site size. As shown in Table 7, during construction of the Project, maximum daily localized unmitigated emissions of NO2, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5 from sources on the Project Site would remain below each of the respective LST values. Unmitigated maximum daily localized emissions would not exceed any of the localized standards for receptors that are within 25 meters of the Project's construction activities. Therefore, based on SCAQMD guidance, localized emissions of criteria pollutants would not have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations that would present a public health concern. The primary TAC that would be generated by construction activities is diesel PM, which would be released from the exhaust stacks of construction equipment. The construction emissions modeling conservatively assumed that all equipment present on the Project Site would be operating simultaneously throughout most of the day, while in all likelihood this would rarely be the case. Average daily emissions of diesel PM would be less than one pound per day throughout the course of Project construction. Therefore, the magnitude of Cabrillo Town Center Air Quality ac77ca PAGE 30 18-676 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 daily diesel PM emissions, would not be sufficient to result in substantial pollutant concentrations at off -site locations nearby. Furthermore, according to SCAQMD methodology, health risks from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of individual cancer risk. "Individual Cancer Risk" is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 30-year period will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk - assessment methodology. The entire duration of construction activities associated with implementation of the Project is anticipated to be approximately 36 months, and the magnitude of daily diesel PM emissions will vary over this time period. No residual emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk are anticipated after construction. Because there is such a short-term exposure period, construction TAC emissions would result in a less than significant impact. Therefore, construction of the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial diesel PM concentrations, and this impact would be less than significant. Operation The Project Site would be redeveloped with multi -family residences, retail, and office uses, land uses that are not typically associated with TAC emissions. Typical sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs include industrial manufacturing processes (e.g., chrome plating, electrical manufacturing, petroleum refinery). The Project would not include these types of potential industrial manufacturing process sources. It is expected that quantities of hazardous TACs generated on -site (e.g., cleaning solvents, paints, landscape pesticides) for the types of proposed land uses would be below thresholds warranting further study under California Accidental Release Program. When considering potential air quality impacts under CEQA, consideration is given to the location of sensitive receptors within close proximity of land uses that emit TACs. CARB has published and adopted the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, which provides recommendations regarding the siting of new sensitive land uses near potential sources of air toxic emissions (e.g., freeways, distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities).39The SCAQMD adopted similar recommendations in its Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning.40 Together, the CARB and SCAQMD guidelines recommend siting distances for both the development of sensitive land uses in proximity to TAC sources and the addition of new TAC sources in proximity to existing sensitive land uses. The primary sources of potential air toxics associated with Project operations include DPM from delivery trucks (e.g., truck traffic on local streets and idling on adjacent streets) and to a lesser extent, facility operations (e.g., natural gas fired boilers). However, these activities, and the land uses associated with the Project, are not considered land uses that generate substantial TAC emissions. It should be noted that the SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments (HRAs) be conducted for substantial individual sources of DPM (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities that generate more than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units) and has 39 California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook, a Community Health Perspective, April 2005. 40 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning, May 6, 2005. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 31 City of Santa Ana Air Quality Iv I.0I u C18 — 677 10/3/2023 July 2o2s provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.41 Based on this guidance, the Project would not include these types of land uses and is not considered to be a substantial source of DPM warranting a refined HRA since daily truck trips to the Project Site would not exceed 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units. In addition, the CARB-mandated airborne toxic control measures (ATCM) limits diesel -fueled commercial vehicles (delivery trucks) to idle for no more than five minutes at any given time, which would further limit diesel particulate emissions. As the Project would not contain substantial TAC sources and is consistent with the CARB and SCAQMD guidelines, the Project would not result in the exposure of off -site sensitive receptors to carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants that exceed the maximum incremental cancer risk of 10 in one million or an acute or chronic hazard index of 1.0, and potential TAC impacts would be less than significant. The Project would generate long-term emissions on -site from area and energy sources that would generate negligible pollutant concentrations of CO, NO2, PM2.5, or PM10 at nearby sensitive receptors. While long-term operations of the Project would add traffic to local roads that produces off -site emissions, these would not result in exceedances of CO air quality standards at roadways in the area due to three key factors. First, CO hotspots are extremely rare and only occur in the presence of unusual atmospheric conditions and extremely cold conditions, neither of which applies to this Project area. Second, auto -related emissions of CO continue to decline because of advances in fuel combustion technology in the vehicle fleet. Finally, the Project would not contribute to the levels of congestion that would be needed to produce emissions concentrations needed to trigger a CO hotspot, as it would add 875 vehicle trips to the local roadway network on weekdays when the development could be leased and operational in 2027.42 However, peak hour vehicle travel would generally reduce from existing conditions, as traffic to and from Project Site would reduce by 50 trips and zero trips during the peak A.M. and P.M. hours, respectively.43 This would represent a reduction in peak hour traffic, which would benefit arterials like Fourth Street between Tustin Avenue and Cabrillo Park Drive, which carry 23,828 vehicles during a weekday.aa This would help reduce any potential that traffic volumes would generate CO exceedances of the ambient air quality standard.45 Finally, the Project would not result in any substantial emissions of TACs during the construction or operations phase. During the construction phase, the primary air quality impacts would be associated with the combustion of diesel fuels, which produce exhaust -related particulate matter that is considered 41 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, 2002. 42 Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. 43 Ibid. 44 City of Santa. Ana GIS Open Data portal, accessed July 26, 2023. 2015 traffic counts adjusted by a one percent adjustment to reflect ambient traffic growth. https://gis-santa- ana.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/927fOb948fcf4OOeafl c13d35239a7b1 /explore?location =33.749256%2C- 117.838786%2C17.62 45 South Coast Air Quality Management District; 2003 AQMP. As discussed in the 2003 AQMP, the 1992 CO Plan included a CO hotspot analysis at four intersections in the peak A.M. and P.M. time periods, including Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway (Lynwood), Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue (Westwood), Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue (Hollywood), and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard (Inglewood). The busiest intersection was Wilshire and Veteran, used by 100,000 vehicles per day. The 2003 AQMP estimated a 4.6 ppm one -hour concentration at this intersection, which meant that an exceedance (20 ppm) would not occur until daily traffic exceeded more than 400,000 vehicles per day. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 32 City of Santa Ana Air Quality 1vtour C 18 — 678 10/3/20233U1y2o2s a toxic air contaminant by CARB based on chronic exposure to these emissions.46 However, construction activities would not produce chronic, long-term exposure to diesel particulate matter. During long-term project operations, the Project does not include typical sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs such as industrial manufacturing processes and automotive repair facilities. As a result, the Project would not create substantial concentrations of TACs. In addition, the SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments be conducted for substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.47 The Project would not generate a substantial number of truck trips. Based on the limited activity of TAC sources, the Project would not warrant the need for a health risk assessment associated with on -site activities. Therefore, the Project's operational impacts on local sensitive receptors would be less than significant. d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would not result in activities that create objectionable odors. The Project is a housing, retail, and office development that would not include any activities typically associated with unpleasant odors and local nuisances (e.g., rendering facilities, dry cleaners). SCAQMD regulations that govern nuisances (i.e., Rule 402, Nuisances) would regulate any occasional odors associated with any of the proposed land uses. As a result, any odor impacts from the Project would be considered less than significant. 46 California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Health Effects of Diesel Exhaust. www. http://oehha.ca.gov/public—info/facts/dieselfacts.html 47 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 33 City of Santa Ana Air Quality lv `l.0uriCl 18 — 679 10/3/2023 July 2023 TECHNICAL APPENDIX City Council 18 — 680 10/3/2023 D®UGLAsK +AssocIATES,LLC EXISTING EMISSIONS City Council 18 — 681 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source City Council 1 / 26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.3.2. Unmitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated City Council 2/26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5. Activity Data 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment City Council 3/26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures City Council 4/26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores 7.4. Health & Equity Measures 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures 8. User Changes to Default Data City Council 5/26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Project Name Operational Year Lead Agency Land Use Scale Analysis Level for Defaults Windspeed (m/s) Precipitation (days) Location County City Air District Air Basin TAZ EDFZ Electric Utility Gas Utility App Version 1.2. Land Use Types Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) 2023 City of Santa Ana Project/site County 2.50 iU-1 1901 E 4th St, Santa Ana, CA 92705, USA Orange Santa Ana South Coast AQMD South Coast 5962 7 Southern California Edison Southern California Gas 2022.1.1.14 General Office 173 1000sgft 8.97 173.n25 0.00 — — — Building City Council 18 — 687 10/3/2023 6/26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected 2. Emissions Summary 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annu Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Unmit. 12.3 6.95 71.4 0.16 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Unmit. 11.0 7.40 59.1 0.15 Average Daily - - - - (Max) Unmit. 11.8 7.52 65.8 0.15 Annual (Max) - - - - Unmit. 2.15 1.37 12.0 0.03 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs 0.20 13.3 13.5 0.19 3.37 3.56 0.18 13.3 13.5 0.18 3.37 3.55 0.19 13.3 13.5 0.18 3.37 3.55 0.04 2.42 2.46 0.03 0.62 0.65 for daily, MT/yr for annu Daily, Summer - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Mobile 6.86 5.71 62.9 0.15 0.09 13.3 13.4 0.09 3.37 3.46 Area 5.38 0.06 7.52 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 Energy 0.06 1.18 0.99 0.01 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 Water -City Council _ _ 18 =688 _ _ _ 10/3/2023 _ 7/26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Waste - - - - - - - - - - Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - Total 12.3 6.95 71.4 0.16 0.20 13.3 13.5 0.19 3.37 3.56 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Mobile 6.78 6.22 58.1 0.14 0.09 13.3 13.4 0.09 3.37 3.46 Area 4.14 - - - - - - Energy 0.06 1.18 0.99 0.01 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 Water - - - - - - - - - - Waste - - - - - - - - - - Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - Total 11.0 7.40 59.1 0.15 0.18 13.3 13.5 0.18 3.37 3.55 Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Mobile 6.74 6.29 59.6 0.14 0.09 13.3 13.4 0.09 3.37 3.46 Area 4.99 0.04 5.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 Energy 0.06 1.18 0.99 0.01 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 Water - - - - - - - - - - Waste - - - - - - - - - - Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - Total 11.8 7.52 65.8 0.15 0.19 13.3 13.5 0.18 3.37 3.55 Annual - - - - - - - - Mobile 1.23 1.15 10.9 0.03 0.02 2.42 2.44 0.02 0.62 0.63 Area 0.91 0.01 0.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Energy 0.01 0.21 0.18 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 Water - - - - - - - - Waste - - - - - - - - Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - Total 2.1Sity Councih.37 12.0 0.03 18 4-689 2.42 2.46 0.03 010/3/2023 0.65 8/26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available. 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annu Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) General Office — — — — — — Building Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) General Office — — — — — — Building Total — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — General Office — — — — — — Building Total — — — — — — 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annu Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) General Office 0.06 1.18 0.99 0.01 Building Total 0.06 1.18 0.99 0.01 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) General Office 0.06 1.18 0.99 0.01 Building Total 0.06 1.18 0.99 0.01 Annual - - - - General Office 0.01 0.21 0.18 < 0.005 Building Total 0.01 0.21 0.18 < 0.005 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Consumer 3.70 - - - Products Architectural 0.44 - - - Coatings Landscape 1.23 0.06 7.52 < 0.005 Equipment Total 5.38 0.06 7.52 < 0.005 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) City Council 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 0.09 - 0.09 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 for daily, MT/yr for annua 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 18-691 10/26 0.01 0.01 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Consumer 3.70 — — — Products Architectural 0.44 — — — Coatings Total 4.14 — — — Annual — — — — Consumer 0.68 — — — Products Architectural 0.08 — — — Coatings Landscape 0.15 0.01 0.94 < 0.005 Equipment Total 0.91 0.01 0.94 < 0.005 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Daily, Summer — — — — (Max) General Office — — — — Building Total — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — (Max) General Office — — — — Building Total — — — — Annual — — — — < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 for daily, MT/yr for annu City Council 18 — 692 11 / 26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office — — — — — — Building Total — — — — — — 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) General Office — — — — — — Building Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) General Office — — — — — — Building Total — — — — Annual — — — — — — General Office — — — — — — Building Total — — — — 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) City Council 18 — 693 12/26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer — — — — — — — — — — (Max) General Office — — — — — — — — — — Building Total — — — — — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — — — — — (Max) General Office — — — — — — — — — — Building Total — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — General Office — — — — — Building Total — — — — — — — — — — 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer — — — — — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — 4.8. Stationar city ounce 18 — 694 10/3/2023 13/26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Daily, Summer — — — — (Max) Total — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — (Max) Total — — — — Annual — — — — Total — — — — 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Daily, Summer — — — — (Max) Total — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — (Max) Total — — — — Annual — — — — Total — — — — 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type City Council for daily, MT/yr for annu for daily, MT/yr for annu 18 — 695 14/26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — Total — — — — — — 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — Total — — — — 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) City Council 18 — 696 10/3/2023 15/26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequestered Subtotal Removed Subtotal Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequestered Subtotal Removed Subtotal Annual — — — — — — — — — — Avoided — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — Sequestered — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — Removed — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — City Council 18 — 697 10/3/2023 16/26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5. Activity Data 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated Total all Land Uses 1,876 1,876 1,876 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 0 0.00 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Snow Days day/yr Summer Days day/yr 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 684,740 18,760 18,760 18,760 259,538 86,513 — 0.00 250 6,847,400 Electricity (kWh+jt)6QQ0G0land CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (0tt/P$ 10/3/2023 17/26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office Building 3,083,355 349 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated General Office Building 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 30,752,382 General Office Building 161 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated General Office Building Household refrigerators R-134a and/or freezers General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 0.0330 0.0040 e �� 4,385,573 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 Engine Tier Number per Day Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated City Council 18 — 700 19/26 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100. Temperature and Extreme Heat 9.03 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth Wildfire 1.31 annual hectares burned Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about 3/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft. Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat Extreme Precipitation Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Wildfire 0 0 0 N/A Flooding City Council N/A N/A 18 — 701 N/A N/A 10/3/2023 20 / 26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat Extreme Precipitation Sea Level Rise Wildfire Flooding Drought Snowpack Reduction Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A i 1 is 2 The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores The maximum CalEnAt'V46 hetrl 'is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a� r�tion burden compared to other census tracts in the state. 1 O/3/2023 21 / 26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Exposure Indicators AQ-Ozone 57.8 AQ-PM 73.8 AQ-DPM 85.3 Drinking Water 53.8 Lead Risk Housing 71.1 Pesticides 0.00 Toxic Releases 90.8 Traffic 98.3 Effect Indicators — CleanUp Sites 91.8 Groundwater 0.00 Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 82.8 Impaired Water Bodies 0.00 Solid Waste 22.1 Sensitive Population — Asthma 55.8 Cardio-vascular 47.8 Low Birth Weights 41.7 Socioeconomic Factor Indicators — Education 75.4 Housing 48.1 Linguistic 66.9 Poverty 54.4 Unemployment 28.2 City Council 18 — 703 10/3/2023 22 / 26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. Economic — Above Poverty 55.40870012 Employed 82.72808931 Median HI 52.89362248 Education — Bachelor's or higher 35.41639933 High school enrollment 100 Preschool enrollment 31.82343128 Transportation — Auto Access 58.09059412 Active commuting 62.68446041 Social — 2-parent households 93.16052868 Voting 23.85474143 Neighborhood — Alcohol availability 53.74053638 Park access 48.29975619 Retail density 98.84511741 Supermarket access 72.33414603 Tree canopy 38.34210189 Housing Homeownership 37.89298088 Housing habitability 43.38508918 Low-inc homeowner �s�� ifiaost burden 18 — 704 27.93532658 10/3/2023 �Y 23 / 26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 78.69883229 Uncrowded housing 20.37726165 Health Outcomes — Insured adults 24.71448736 Arthritis 67.1 Asthma ER Admissions 50.7 High Blood Pressure 72.3 Cancer (excluding skin) 55.0 Asthma 49.0 Coronary Heart Disease 61.0 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 53.7 Diagnosed Diabetes 54.0 Life Expectancy at Birth 67.7 Cognitively Disabled 95.5 Physically Disabled 83.0 Heart Attack ER Admissions 78.0 Mental Health Not Good 41.5 Chronic Kidney Disease 45.1 Obesity 51.8 Pedestrian Injuries 60.5 Physical Health Not Good 44.3 Stroke 58.2 Health Risk Behaviors — Binge Drinking 15.4 Current Smoker 44.4 No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 40.3 Climate Change Exposurac — City Council 18 — 705 10/3/2023 24 / 26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Wildfire Risk 0.0 SLR Inundation Area 0.0 Children 64.0 Elderly 60.7 English Speaking 29.3 Foreign -born 72.2 Outdoor Workers 33.6 Climate Change Adaptive Capacity — Impervious Surface Cover 46.9 Traffic Density 99.3 Traffic Access 23.0 Other Indices — Hardship 66.1 Other Decision Support — 2016 Voting 58.2 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 71.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 57.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state 7.4. Health & Equity Measures City Council 18 — 706 10/3/2023 25 / 26 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data Land Use Project plan City Council 18 — 707 26 / 26 10/3/2023 V) z 0 W W D D LL City Council 18 — 708 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated 3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated 3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 3.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated City Council 18-709 1 / 55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated 3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated 3.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated 3.15. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated 3.17. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated 3.19. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use City Council 18-710 2/55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated City Council 18-711 3/55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies 5.5. Architectural Coatings 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies 5.7. Construction Paving 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment City Council 18 — 712 4/55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated City Council 18-713 5/55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores 7.4. Health & Equity Measures 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures 8. User Changes to Default Data City Council 18-714 6/55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Project Name Construction Start Date Operational Year Lead Agency Land Use Scale Analysis Level for Defaults Windspeed (m/s) Precipitation (days) Location County City Air District Air Basin TAZ EDFZ Electric Utility Gas Utility App Version 1.2. Land Use Types Cabrillo Town Center (Future) 9/2/2024 2027 City of Santa Ana Project/site County 2.50 18.6 1901 E 4th St, Santa Ana, CA 92705, USA Orange Santa Ana South Coast AQMD South Coast 5962 7 Southern California Edison Southern California Gas 2022.1.1.14 ou 7/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Apartments Mid Rise 449 Dwelling Unit 11.8 839,447 8,000 Strip Mall 5.80 1000sgft 0.13 5,800 500 Enclosed Parking 898 Space 8.08 312,051 0.00 with Elevator Parking Lot 11.0 Space 0.10 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking 116 Space 1.04 46,400 0.00 Structure General Office 11.4 1000sgft 0.26 11,400 500 Building Condo/Townhouse 58.0 Dwelling Unit 3.63 150,530 1,000 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 63.2 29.7 46.7 0.06 1.11 9.16 Daily, Winter - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 3.75 38.6 40.2 0.06 1.62 8.42 Average Daily - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 19.2 11.1 28.2 0.04 0.31 5.51 Annual (Max) - - - - - - 9.55 10.0 5.80 1.02 1.50 0.28 Unmit. 3.58ity CounCif.03 5.14 0.01 18 Q116 1.01 1.06 0.05 8/55 2,066 - 267 - 2.19 2.54 4.14 5.64 1.32 1.59 0.29 OM/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily - Summer (Max) 2024 2.75 29.7 24.7 0.06 1.11 3.07 4.18 1.02 0.61 1.63 2025 3.08 16.1 44.1 0.05 0.46 7.80 8.26 0.42 1.87 2.29 2026 2.91 15.1 42.3 0.05 0.40 7.80 8.21 0.37 1.87 2.24 2027 63.2 15.7 46.7 0.05 0.38 9.16 9.55 0.35 2.19 2.54 Daily - Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) 2024 3.75 38.6 34.9 0.06 1.62 8.42 10.0 1.50 4.14 5.64 2025 3.27 29.8 40.2 0.06 1.24 7.80 8.26 1.14 1.87 2.63 2026 2.90 15.5 38.5 0.05 0.40 7.80 8.21 0.37 1.87 2.24 2027 2.58 14.7 36.9 0.05 0.36 7.80 8.16 0.34 1.87 2.21 Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - 2024 0.76 7.78 6.76 0.01 0.31 0.89 1.20 0.28 0.29 0.57 2025 1.36 8.33 16.4 0.02 0.28 2.58 2.87 0.26 0.65 0.92 2026 2.07 11.1 28.2 0.04 0.29 5.51 5.80 0.27 1.32 1.59 2027 19.2 6.54 17.4 0.02 0.16 3.60 3.76 0.14 0.86 1.01 Annual - - - - - - - - - - 2024 0.14 1.42 1.23 < 0.005 0.06 0.16 0.22 0.05 0.05 0.10 2025 0.25 1.52 2.99 < 0.005 0.05 0.47 0.52 0.05 0.12 0.17 2026 0.38 2.03 5.14 0.01 0.05 1.01 1.06 0.05 0.24 0.29 2027 3.50 1.19 3.18 < 0.005 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.16 0.18 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds City Council 18 - 717 10/3/2023 9/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Unmit. 37.2 8.61 121 0.22 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Unmit. 31.9 8.75 70.2 0.21 Average Daily - - - - (Max) Unmit. 35.4 8.95 103 0.21 Annual (Max) - - - - Unmit. 6.46 1.63 18.7 0.04 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Daily, Summer (Max) for daily, MT/yr for annu 0.31 19.5 19.8 0.29 4.94 5.23 0.27 19.5 19.7 0.26 4.94 5.20 0.28 19.5 19.8 0.27 4.94 5.21 0.05 3.55 3.60 0.05 0.90 0.95 for daily, MT/yr for annu Mobile 8.49 6.33 74.9 0.20 0.12 19.5 19.6 0.11 4.94 5.05 Area 28.6 0.58 45.2 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.05 - 0.05 Energy 0.10 1.70 0.76 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.14 - 0.14 Water - - - - - - - - - - Waste - - - - - - - - Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - Total 37.2 8.61 121 0.22 0.31 19.5 19.8 0.29 4.94 5.23 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Mobile $-city CounciP.88 69.3 0.19 18 0118 19.5 19.6 0.11 �V/3/2023 5.05 10/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Area 23.4 0.17 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 Energy 0.10 1.70 0.76 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.14 - 0.14 Water - - - - - - - - Waste - - - - - - - - - - Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - Total 31.9 8.75 70.2 0.21 0.27 19.5 19.7 0.26 4.94 5.20 Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Mobile 8.36 6.95 71.1 0.20 0.12 19.5 19.6 0.11 4.94 5.05 Area 26.9 0.29 30.9 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 Energy 0.10 1.70 0.76 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.14 - 0.14 Water - - - - - - - - - - Waste - - - - - - - - - - Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - Total 35.4 8.95 103 0.21 0.28 19.5 19.8 0.27 4.94 5.21 Annual - - - - - - - - Mobile 1.53 1.27 13.0 0.04 0.02 3.55 3.57 0.02 0.90 0.92 Area 4.92 0.05 5.64 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Energy 0.02 0.31 0.14 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 Water - - - - - - - - - - Waste - - - - - - - - Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - Total 6.46 1.63 18.7 0.04 0.05 3.55 3.60 0.05 0.90 0.95 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria PollutanteijP/d&;q,rldaily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dg io?glgily, MT/yr for annual) 10/3/2023 11 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 - 1.06 0.98 - 0.98 Equipment Demolition - - - - - 1.88 1.88 - 0.29 0.29 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - (Max) Off -Road 2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 - 1.06 0.98 - 0.98 Equipment Demolition - - 1.88 1.88 - 0.29 0.29 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.32 3.00 2.62 < 0.005 0.13 - 0.13 0.12 - 0.12 Equipment Demolition - - - - - 0.23 0.23 - 0.03 0.03 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.06 0.55 0.48 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 Equipment Demolition - - - - - 0.04 0.04 - 0.01 0.01 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Worker 0.06 0.06 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0-tity Councii.79 2.09 0.03 18 0.0h0 0.99 1.03 0.05 M/3/2023 0.32 12/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Worker 0.06 0.07 0.78 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 4.97 2.11 0.03 Average Daily - - - - Worker 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.61 0.25 <0.005 Annual - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling <0.005 0.11 0.05 <0.005 3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Onsite - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Off -Road 3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 Equipment Dust From - - - - Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily City Council 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.99 1.03 0.05 0.28 0.32 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 for daily, MT/yr for annu 1.60 - 1.60 1.47 - 1.47 - 7.68 7.68 - 3.94 3.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 - 721 10/3/2023 13/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road 0.05 0.49 Equipment Dust From - - Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 Annual - - Off -Road 0.01 0.09 Equipment Dust From - - Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, Winter - - (Max) Worker 0.06 0.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.04 2.57 Average Daily - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 Vendor 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.04 Annual - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 Vendor 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.01 City Council 0.45 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - - - 0.11 0.11 - 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - - - 0.02 0.02 - 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.01 0.02 0.51 0.54 0.02 0.14 0.17 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 18 - 722 10/3/2023 14/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - - (Max) Daily, Winter - - - - - - (Max) Off -Road 3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 - Equipment Dust From - - - - - 3.59 Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - Off -Road 0.37 3.62 3.19 0.01 0.15 - Equipment Dust From - - - - - 0.38 Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - Off -Road 0.07 0.66 0.58 < 0.005 0.03 - Equipment Dust From - - - - - 0.07 Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - - 1.45 1.33 - 1.33 3.59 - 1.42 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.14 - 0.14 0.38 - 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 0.07 - 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 18-723 15/55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Worker 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling <0.005 0.07 0.03 <0.005 Average Daily - - - - Worker 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 Annual - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Onsite - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Off -Road 3.20 29.7 28.3 0.06 Equipment Dust From - - - - Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily City Council 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 for daily, MT/yr for annu 1.23 - 1.23 1.14 - 1.14 - 3.59 3.59 - 1.42 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 - 724 10/3/2023 16/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road 0.19 1.80 1.72 < 0.005 0.07 - 0.07 0.07 - 0.07 Equipment Dust From - - - - - 0.22 0.22 - 0.09 0.09 Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.33 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 Equipment Dust From - - - - - 0.04 0.04 - 0.02 0.02 Material Movement Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - (Max) Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Worker 0.07 0.08 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Annual - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 City Council 18 - 725 10/3/2023 17/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Off -Road 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Off -Road 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.34 3.13 3.90 0.01 0.13 - 0.13 0.12 - 0.12 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.06 0.57 0.71 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Worker 1.85 1.81 29.2 0.00 0.00 6.81 6.81 0.00 1.60 1.60 Vendor 0.10 3.84 1.91 0.03 0.03 0.99 1.02 0.03 0.27 0.30 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) City Council 18 - 726 10/3/2023 18/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Worker 1.84 2.06 25.2 0.00 0.00 6.81 6.81 0.00 1.60 1.60 Vendor 0.10 3.98 1.95 0.03 0.03 0.99 1.02 0.03 0.27 0.30 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.54 0.61 7.90 0.00 0.00 2.01 2.01 0.00 0.47 0.47 Vendor 0.03 1.20 0.58 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.08 0.09 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.10 0.11 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.09 Vendor 0.01 0.22 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 - 0.38 0.35 - 0.35 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Off -Road 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 - 0.38 0.35 - 0.35 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27 - 0.27 0.25 - 0.25 Equipment City Council 18 - 727 10/3/2023 19/55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - Off -Road 0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Worker 1.76 1.59 27.5 0.00 Vendor 0.08 3.70 1.85 0.03 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Worker 1.76 1.82 23.7 0.00 Vendor 0.07 3.85 1.89 0.03 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - Worker 1.25 1.30 17.6 0.00 Vendor 0.05 2.77 1.34 0.02 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - Worker 0.23 0.24 3.21 0.00 Vendor 0.01 0.50 0.24 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 - 0.05 0.05 - 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.81 6.81 0.00 1.60 1.60 0.03 0.99 1.02 0.03 0.27 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.81 6.81 0.00 1.60 1.60 0.03 0.99 1.02 0.03 0.27 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.81 4.81 0.00 1.13 1.13 0.02 0.70 0.72 0.02 0.19 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.00 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.13 0.13 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 for daily, MT/yr for annual) 20 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - (Max) Off -Road 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 - 0.34 0.31 - 0.31 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Off -Road 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 - 0.34 0.31 - 0.31 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.43 3.90 5.37 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.13 - 0.13 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.08 0.71 0.98 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Worker 1.49 1.56 25.8 0.00 0.00 6.81 6.81 0.00 1.60 1.60 Vendor 0.07 3.55 1.76 0.03 0.03 0.99 1.02 0.03 0.27 0.30 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - (Max) Worker 1.48 1.60 22.2 0.00 0.00 6.81 6.81 0.00 1.60 1.60 Vendor 0.07 3.70 1.81 0.03 0.03 0.99 1.02 0.03 0.27 0.30 Hauling 0.nn n nn n nn n nn n nn n nn n nn n nn n nn 0.00 City Council 18 - 729 10/3/2023 21 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Average Daily Worker 0.61 0.75 9.59 0.00 Vendor 0.03 1.55 0.74 0.01 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - Worker 0.11 0.14 1.75 0.00 Vendor 0.01 0.28 0.13 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.15. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) 0.00 2.79 2.79 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.01 0.41 0.42 0.01 0.11 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.12 < 0.005 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 for daily, MT/yr for annu Off -Road 0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 Equipment Paving 0.37 - - - - - - - - - Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - (Max) Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.14 1.35 1.80 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 Equipment Paving 0.07 - - - - - - - - - Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.25 0.33 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 Equipment City Council 18 - 730 10/3/2023 22 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Paving 0.01 - - - Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Worker 0.05 0.05 0.84 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Average Daily - - - - Worker 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.17. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 for daily, MT/yr for annu Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Off -Road 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 Equipment Architectural 60.2 - - - - - - - - - Coatings City Council 18 - 731 10/3/2023 23 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - (Max) Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.25 0.34 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 Equipment Architectural 18.0 - - - - - - Coatings Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Equipment Architectural 3.28 - - - - - - - - - Coatings Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Worker 0.30 0.31 5.15 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.32 0.32 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Average Daily - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.09 0.11 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.09 0.09 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 Vendor 0-tity 0.00 Councff oo 0.00 0.00 18 1132 0.00 0.00 0.00 offs/3/2023 24 / 55 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.19. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Onsite - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Off -Road 0.19 1.29 1.45 < 0.005 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter - - - - (Max) Off -Road 0.19 1.29 1.45 < 0.005 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.22 0.25 < 0.005 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 for daily, MT/yr for annua -,E = 0.06 - 0.00 0.00 0.06 - 0.00 0.00 0.01 - 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 C�IiZ��iliL - 0.05 0.00 0.00 - 0.01 0.00 0.00 - < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.ggity Councib.00 0.00 0.00 18 g0-633 0.00 0.00 0.00 01(/3/2O23 0.00 25 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available. 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer - - (Max) Apartments Mid Rise City Council 18-734 26 / 55 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10/3/2023 Strip Mall — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — Parking with Elevator Parking Lot — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking Structure General Office — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — se Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Apartments Mid — — — — — — Rise Strip Mall — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking with Elevator Parking Lot — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking Structure General Office — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — se Total — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — Apartments Mid — — — — — — Rise City Council 18 — 735 27 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Strip Mall - - - - - - Enclosed - - - - - Parking with Elevator Parking Lot - - - - - - Enclosed - - - - - - Parking Structure General Office - - - - - - Building Condo/Townhou - - - - - - se Total - - - - - - 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annua Daily, Summer - - - - - - (Max) Apartments Mid 0.07 1.26 0.54 0.01 0.10 - Rise Strip Mall < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Enclosed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Parking with Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Enclosed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Parking Structure General Office < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 - Building City Council 18 - 736 28 / 55 0.10 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 JIi7, 0.10 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 LIIIj 10/3/2023 0.10 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Condo/Townhou 0.02 0.35 0.15 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 se Total 0.10 1.70 0.76 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.14 - 0.14 Daily, Winter - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Apartments Mid 0.07 1.26 0.54 0.01 0.10 - 0.10 0.10 - 0.10 Rise Strip Mall < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Enclosed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Parking with Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Parking Structure General Office < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 Building Condo/Townhou 0.02 0.35 0.15 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 se Total 0.10 1.70 0.76 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.14 - 0.14 Annual - - - - - - - - Apartments Mid 0.01 0.23 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 Rise Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Enclosed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Parking with Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Parking Structure General Office < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Building City Council 18 - 737 10/3/2023 29 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Condo/Townhou < 0.005 0.06 0.03 < 0.005 Total 0.02 0.31 0.14 < 0.005 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Daily, Summer - - - - (Max) Hearths 0.01 0.17 0.07 <0.005 Consumer 21.6 - - - Products Architectural 1.80 - - - Coatings Landscape 5.21 0.41 45.1 < 0.005 Equipment Total 28.6 0.58 45.2 < 0.005 Daily, Winter - - (Max) Hearths 0.01 0.17 0.07 <0.005 Consumer 21.6 - - - Products Architectural 1.80 - - - Coatings Total 23.4 0.17 0.07 < 0.005 Annual - - - - Hearths < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Consumer 3.94 - - - Products 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 for daily, MT/yr for annu 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 0.06 - 0.06 0.05 - 0.05 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 City Council 18 - 738 10/3/2023 30 / 55 Architectural 0.33 — — — — — Coatings Landscape 0.65 0.05 5.64 < 0.005 0.01 — Equipment Total 4.92 0.05 5.64 < 0.005 0.01 — 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annua Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Apartments Mid — — — — — — Rise Strip Mall — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking with Elevator Parking Lot — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking Structure General Office — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — se Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Apartments Mid — — — — — — Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Rise City Council 18 — 739 31 / 55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking with Elevator Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — Parking Structure General Office — — — — — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — — — se Total — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — Apartments Mid — — — — — — — — — — Rise Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — — — — — Parking with Elevator Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — — — — — Parking Structure General Office — — — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — — — — — se Total — — — — — — — — 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use City Council 18 — 740 10/3/2023 32 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.5.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annu Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Apartments Mid — — — — — — Rise Strip Mall — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking with Elevator Parking Lot — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking Structure General Office — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — se Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Apartments Mid — — — — — — Rise Strip Mall — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking with Elevator Parking Lot — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking Structure City Council 18 — 741 33 / 55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — se Total — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — Apartments Mid — — — — Rise Strip Mall — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking with Elevator Parking Lot — — — — — — Enclosed — — — — — — Parking Structure General Office — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — se Total — — — — — — 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Apartments Mid — — — — — — Rise Strip Mall _City Council _ _ 18 =742 34/55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — se Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Apartments Mid — — — — — — Rise Strip Mall — — — — — — General Office — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — se Total — — — — Annual — — — Apartments Mid — — — — — — Rise Strip Mall — — — — — — General Office — — — — — — Building Condo/Townhou — — — — — — se Total — — — — 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) City Council 18 — 743 10/3/2023 35 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer — — — — (Max) Total — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — (Max) Total — Annual — — Total — — — — 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs Daily, Summer — — — — (Max) Total — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — (Max) Total — — — — Annual — — — — Total — — — — 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs for daily, MT/yr for annu for daily, MT/yr for annu City Council 18 — 744 10/3/2023 36 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — Annual — — — Total — — — — — — 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — Total — — — — — — 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Total —City Councir 18 — 745 37 / 55 1 0/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Total — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — Total — — — — — — 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annu Daily, Summer — — — — — — (Max) Avoided — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — Sequestered — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — Removed — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — Daily, Winter — — — — — — (Max) Avoided — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — Sequestered — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — Removed — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — Annual City Council 18 — 746 38 / 55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Avoided — — Subtotal — — Sequestered — — Subtotal — — Removed — — Subtotal — — 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule Demolition Demolition 9/2/2024 Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/1/2024 Grading Grading 11 /8/2024 Building Construction Building Construction 8/1/2025 Paving Paving 5/1 /2025 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/1/2027 Trenching Trenching 2/3/2025 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Demolition Excavators Diesel 10/31 /2024 5.00 44.0 — 11 /7/2024 5.00 5.00 — 1 /31 /2025 5.00 61.0 — 7/31 /2027 5.00 521 — 7/31 /2025 5.00 66.0 — 9/30/2027 5.00 109 — 4/30/2025 5.00 63.0 — Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 City Council 18 — 747 10/3/2023 39 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Diesel Saws Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Grading Graders Diesel Grading Excavators Diesel Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Grading Scrapers Diesel Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Building Construction Cranes Diesel Building Construction Welders Diesel Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Paving Pavers Diesel Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Paving Rollers Diesel Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Trenching Trenchers Diesel 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated Demolition - Demolition City Council Worker Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48 Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Average 1.00 8.00 40.0 0.50 15.0 18 - 748 18.5 LDA,4013M23 40 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Demolition Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Demolition Hauling 54.5 20.0 HHDT Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT Site Preparation — — — Site Preparation Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Site Preparation Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Site Preparation Hauling 28.2 20.0 HHDT Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT Grading — — — — Grading Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Grading Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Grading Hauling 0.82 20.0 HHDT Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT Building Construction — — — — Building Construction Worker 521 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 116 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT Paving — — — — Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT Architectural Coating — — — — Architectural Coating Worker 104 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Architectural Coating Hauling n nn gn n HHnT City Council 18 — 749 10/3/2023 41 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT Trenching — — — — Trenching Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Trenching Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Trenching Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Trenching Onsite truck — — HHDT 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.5. Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 2,004,703 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 668,234 43,689 10,588 24,110 Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,000 Site Preparation — 1,422 7.50 0.00 — Grading — 400 183 0.00 — Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.22 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies City Council 18 — 750 10/3/2023 42 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Water Exposed Area 2 Water Demolished Area 2 5.7. Construction Paving Apartments Mid Rise Strip Mall Enclosed Parking with Elevator Parking Lot Enclosed Parking Structure General Office Building Condo/Townhouse 61 % 61 % 36% 36% — 0% 0.00 0% 8.08 100% 0.10 100% 1.04 100% 0.00 0% — 0% 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) 2024 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005 2025 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005 2026 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005 2027 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 43 / 55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total all Land Uses 2,751 2,751 2,751 1,004,115 27,510 27,510 27,510 10,041,150 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated Apartments Mid Rise Wood Fireplaces Gas Fireplaces Propane Fireplaces Electric Fireplaces No Fireplaces Conventional Wood Stoves Catalytic Wood Stoves Non -Catalytic Wood Stoves Pellet Wood Stoves Condo/Townhouse Wood Fireplaces Gas Fireplaces Propane Fireplaces Electric Fireplaces No Fireplaces Conventional Wood Stoves Catalytic Wood Stoves Non -Catalytic Wood Stoves Pellet Wood Stoves City Council 0 10 0 0 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 18-752 0 44 / 55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 2004703.4249999998 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Snow Days Summer Days 668,234 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 43,689 10,588 day/yr 0.00 day/yr 250 Electricitv (kWh/vr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/vr 24,110 Apartments Mid Rise 1,645,960 346 0.0330 0.0040 4,986,972 Strip Mall 56,964 346 0.0330 0.0040 34,724 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1,151,915 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Parking Lot 3,778 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Enclosed Parking Structure 162,466 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 General Office Building 203,151 346 0.0330 0.0040 288,950 Condo/Townhouse 266,346 346 0.0330 0.0040 1,393,761 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated City • Indoor Water (gal/y '753 Outdoor Water (gal/year) Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Apartments Mid Rise 16,849,017 126,724 Strip Mall 429,621 6,480 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 General Office Building 2,026,165 6,480 Condo/Townhouse 2,176,488 15,840 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated Apartments Mid Rise 513 — Strip Mall 6.09 — Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 — Parking Lot 0.00 — Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 — General Office Building 10.6 — Condo/Townhouse 66.3 — 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C & R-410A 2,088 Other residential A/C and heat pumps < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0 City Council 18 — 754 10/3/2023 46 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators R-134a and/or freezers Strip Mall Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps Strip Mall Stand-alone retail R-134a refrigerators and freezers Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators R-404A and freezers General Office Building Household refrigerators R-134a and/or freezers General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps Condo/Townhouse Average room A/C & R-410A Other residential A/C and heat pumps Condo/Townhouse Household refrigerators R-134a and/or freezers 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00 47 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100. Temperature and Ex tl, ounCil M 18 — 756 annualdays o extremeneat10/3/2023 48 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Extreme Precipitation 3.50 Sea Level Rise 0.00 Wildfire 1.31 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm meters of inundation depth annual hectares burned Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about 3/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft. Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat 0 0 0 N/A Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 0 0 0 N/A Wildfire 0 0 0 N/A Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.3. Adjusted ('1imate Rick Scores City Council 18 — 757 10/3/2023 49 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 1 1 2 Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2 Wildfire 1 1 1 2 Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. Exposure Indicators — AQ-Ozone 57.8 AQ-PM 73.8 AQ-DPM 85.3 Drinking Water 53.8 Lead Risk Housing 71.1 Pesticides G.QG City Council 18 — 758 10/3/2023 50 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Toxic Releases Traffic Effect Indicators CleanUp Sites Groundwater Haz Waste Facilities/Generators Impaired Water Bodies Solid Waste Sensitive Population Asthma Cardio-vascular Low Birth Weights Socioeconomic Factor Indicators Education Housing Linguistic Poverty Unemployment 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier cc Economic Above Poverty Employed Median HI Education 90.8 98.3 91.8 0.00 82.8 0.00 22.1 55.8 47.8 41.7 75.4 48.1 66.9 54.4 28.2 conditions 55.40870012 82.72808931 52.89362248 to other census tracts in the state. City Council 18 — 759 51 / 55 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Bachelor's or higher 35.41639933 High school enrollment 100 Preschool enrollment 31.82343128 Transportation — Auto Access 58.09059412 Active commuting 62.68446041 Social — 2-parent households 93.16052868 Voting 23.85474143 Neighborhood — Alcohol availability 53.74053638 Park access 48.29975619 Retail density 98.84511741 Supermarket access 72.33414603 Tree canopy 38.34210189 Housing — Homeownership 37.89298088 Housing habitability 43.38508918 Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 27.93532658 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 78.69883229 Uncrowded housing 20.37726165 Health Outcomes — Insured adults 24.71448736 Arthritis 67.1 Asthma ER Admissions 50.7 High Blood Pressure 72.3 Cancer (excluding skin) 5s n City Council 18 — 760 10/3/2023 52 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Asthma 49.0 Coronary Heart Disease 61.0 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 53.7 Diagnosed Diabetes 54.0 Life Expectancy at Birth 67.7 Cognitively Disabled 95.5 Physically Disabled 83.0 Heart Attack ER Admissions 78.0 Mental Health Not Good 41.5 Chronic Kidney Disease 45.1 Obesity 51.8 Pedestrian Injuries 60.5 Physical Health Not Good 44.3 Stroke 58.2 Health Risk Behaviors — Binge Drinking 15.4 Current Smoker 44.4 No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 40.3 Climate Change Exposures — Wildfire Risk 0.0 SLR Inundation Area 0.0 Children 64.0 Elderly 60.7 English Speaking 29.3 Foreign -born 72.2 Outdoor Workers 33.6 Climate Change AdaPtivP C'np;;Ht�/ - City Council 18 — 761 10/3/2023 53 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Impervious Surface Cover 46.9 Traffic Density 99.3 Traffic Access 23.0 Other Indices — Hardship 66.1 Other Decision Support — 2016 Voting 58.2 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 71.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 57.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 7.4. Health & Equity Measures No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data City Council 18 — 762 10/3/2023 54 / 55 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Land Use Construction: Construction Phases Construction: Off -Road Equipment Construction: Trips and VMT Operations: Hearths Project plans and LLG trip generation estimates. Population based on SCAG's average 2016 persons -per -household rate for the City of 4.6 persons per household. Developer information 10 CY haul truck capacity during demolition, 14 CY during site preparation and grading. Developer information City Council 18 — 763 55 / 55 10/3/2023 DOUGLAsKim+AssociATEs,LLC MATES V TOXIC EMISSIONS OVERVIEW City Council 18 — 764 10/3/2023 About Air Toxics Cancer Risk + Thousand Oaks Information about community profile statistics — Information about emission sources ge�rr Download PDF gu 1 PI Residential Air Toxics Cancer Risk at MATES Monitoring Sites 10 Residential Air Toxics Cancer Risk Calculated from Model Data Cancer Risk [per million] 1601-4800 1451-1600 ' 1301-1450 1151-1300 1001-1150 851 -1000 701 - 850 551 - 700 401 - 550 251 - 400 101 -250 0-100 South Coast AQMD Boundary i The air toxics cancer risk data presented in the MATES Data Visualization is calculated using a population -weighted average. 2Ut� n City Council 18 — 765 Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, USGS, NGA, EPA, NPS O, Zoom to m X In zip code 92705, the cancer risk is 416 per million Air toxics cancer risk in this zip code is higher than 37.0% of the South Coast AQMD population Pollutants contributing to cancer risk Diesel -n Particulate Arsenic Matter Other Benzene Formaldehyde �I Won 1 I Base ° u, Oceansirl. Escon,lnl�• I, E'l-1, MCAS '- . III, . i'rhwmar I I' q"II San Diego I� 10/3/2023 Tijuana Powered by Esri DOUGLAsKim+AssocIATEs,LLC CALENVIROSCREEN 4.0 OUTPUT City Council 18 — 766 10/3/2023 The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 tool shows cumulative impacts in California communities by census tract. How to use this map • Use your mouse or touchpad to pan around. • Zoom in/out with a mouse wheel or the +/- icons. • Search by location or census tract number with the search icon. • Click on a census tract to view additional information in the pop- up window. • Dock the pop-up window to the side of the screen by clicking the dock icon. • Export a map view that includes the legend and popup using the screenshot widget. • Learn more about CalEnviroScreen 4.0 and how this map was --A k Overall Percentile CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Results ■ >90 - 100 (Highest Scores) ■ >80-90 ■ >70-80 >60-70 >50-60 >40-50 ■ >30-40 ■ >20-30 ■ >10-20 ■ 0-10(Lowest Scores) CalEnviroScreen 4.0 High Pollution, Low Population : Am rdla - a lendora e v Find address or piace Q )) h SanManno �� UrrL n an one rlel aienr:•nt Uplama San Gahriel r r i �. lmbra ...ia B aaldwin F ir l. Baldwin P F • .. ,�� .ii, ..el. : IrlontrI I El Monte Rosemead �I ESt Covil'I f� l` r •- y _. 'omona_ 4onterey Par_:, South @I IL a ilk La Puente 4- Walnld e e....«..w..u,. Industry,• � v Chinn - � I - • Diamond Bar Chino ,fills Census Tract: 6059075403 EU X La Hah �- (Population:8,105) ITS The results for each indicator range from 0- La 100 and representthe percentile ranking of >_s i. Hills census tract 6059075403 relative to other re park census tracts. CaIFnviroSCreen 4.0 71 PercentiEe Pollution Burden 87 PercentiEe Population Characteristics 53 Percentile 0 Pacific 08a'nNaOcean l L.-3cl. Hu ton Be -a Mes•ir` to i r-l vport P �, I 1 Chin:=, n Eastvale CHIMo Earstvale - No 'i i I { City Council 18 — 767 Esri, HERE, Garmin,FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA I Header, PI, P2, P3, P4, HI, and TV fiies:,l . HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA LSA July 2022 City Council 18 — 768 10/3/2023 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA FRH Realty LLC 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 100 San Diego, California 92121 Prepared by: Casey Tibbet, M.A., and Eugene Heck, M.A. LSA 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 (951) 781-9310 Project No. FRC2201 LSA July 2022 City Council 18 — 769 10/3/2023 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J MANAGEMENT SUMMARY LSA conducted a historic resources assessment for Town Center Plaza located in Santa Ana, Orange County, California. The assessment included archival research, outreach to local historical groups, a field survey, and this report. The project area includes four parcels (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 400- 051-02, -09, -14, and -15) that together make up the approximately 8-acre project area, which is currently developed with four office buildings built between 1971 and 1978. The project proposes to demolish the existing office buildings and construct affordable housing on the site. The City of Santa Ana (City), as Lead Agency for the project, required this study as part of the environmental review process to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the study is to provide the City with the necessary information and analysis to determine, as mandated by CEQA, whether the proposed project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical resources that may exist in or around the project area. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, LSA conducted historical background research and carried out an intensive -level field survey. The project area is developed with four office buildings (1901 and 1971 East 4th Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive) and related parking. Only the building at 1971 East 4th Street dates to the historic period (50 years of age or older; pre-1973). Therefore, in compliance with CEQA, this is the only building that was documented and evaluated for historical significance. As a result of the research and field survey, the commercial building at 1971 East 4th Street does not appear to be historically significant under either the California Register or City of Santa Ana criteria. It is not a historical resource as defined by CEQA. As previously noted, the building is part of an approximately 8-acre phased development, Town Center Plaza, that includes four buildings with a cohesive design aesthetic. However, the development as a whole is less than 50 years old and none of the buildings are exceptional examples of a particular style. Pdiy °found (07/21/22) 18 - 770 10/3/2023 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENTSUMMARY..................................................................................................................... i TABLEOF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................................. ii INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 METHODS................................................................................................................... 4 ArchivalResearch.......................................................................................................................... 4 FieldSurvey................................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS..................................................................................................................... 5 Research........................................................................................................................................ 5 FieldSurvey................................................................................................................................. 16 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION...................................................................................... 24 Definitions................................................................................................................................... 24 Evaluation.................................................................................................................................... 25 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................... 28 REFERENCES............................................................................................................. 29 FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location and Vicinity................................................................................................... 2 Figure2: Project Area............................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3: 1971 East 4th Street, fagade. View to the east(1/18/22)..................................................... 17 Figure 4: 1971 East 4th Street, south and east elevations. View to the northwest (1/18/22) . ........... 17 Figure 5: 1971 East 4th Street, north elevation and fagade (west elevation). View to the southeast(1/18/22).................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 6: 1971 East 4th Street, exterior stairway, east elevation. View to the north (1/18/22) . ........ 18 Figure 7: 1971 East 4th Street, second floor hallway. View to the west(1/18/22)............................. 19 Figure 8: 1971 East 4th Street, second level, center of the building. View to the south toward courtyard surrounded by office suites (1/18/22). There is a similar courtyard to the north............................................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 9: 1971 East 4th Street, second level, courtyard. View to the north toward the center of the building shows the third story office(1/18/22)................................................................ 20 Figure 10: 1901 East 4th Street, south and east elevations. View to the northwest (1/18/22).......... 21 Figure 11: 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive, fagade. View to the north(1/18/22).................................. 22 Figure 12: 515 North Cabrillo Park Drive, fagade. View to the north(1/18/22).................................. 22 I_1:2"ill 01K4 A: DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION (DPR) 523 FORMS Pdiy °tourici '07/21/22) 18 - 771 10/3/2023 ii HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J INTRODUCTION At the request of FRH Realty LLC, LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) performed a historic resources study on approximately 8 acres of land in Santa Ana, Orange County, California (Figures 1 and 2). The subject property of the study, 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street and 515 and 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 400-051-02, -09, -14, and -15), is located at the northeast corner of East 4th Street and North Cabrillo Park Drive, in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 9 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian, as depicted on the United States Geological Survey Tustin, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map (USGS 1981). The study is part of the environmental review process for the proposed redevelopment of the properties. The City of Santa Ana (City), as Lead Agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Public Resources Code [PRC] § 21000, et seq.) and the City's Places of Historical and Architectural Significance (Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code). LSA performed the present study to provide the City with the necessary information and analysis to determine, as mandated by CEQA, whether the proposed project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical resources that may exist in or around the project area. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, LSA conducted historical background research and carried out an intensive -level field survey. The following report is a complete account of the methods, results, and final conclusion of the study. Play °found (07/21/22) 18 - 772 10/3/2023 1 N --/ j■- 9 11d, �w r"\x V r St John c Cam ago I ' zl , aYi'- S� v:A AVE n. Hoover Ed- 163 0' Elle • (s2: j �� j B6 _ " Co t p R •-E cr - CArAL/NAQ. W �•� —�;l j I —"i`.R i I - /� Q sr o u Siarra.c=• 1 . l_ b a, •S ,'Sch R1=1'i o 1 (fo+ I Loma !�' A N I I Q �,, -, o ((nnn a :t! -T s<h fl .``' BM =b ' ■ C fD1z 67 r '■ ' ,arTf �611f 4 ;r U .PF� z;Q fir` y + I `:Z h' 2 - p cam- : n pa'ci Tank— ti C' xas'.,tiO TON' -' -- ---J p iTQN'\ AVE H ■ 'O �r AVER �r 2 ,, I p�K U-111' e Jo r I,B_sl� .a9fpf/Lt_i"sn. �,' - ? •tac.4a--aE= Sck < B 141 • , Ej w0 ijj+riri� It 1----_-•• EW' 6 r.i _ s r ■ Me, • AP u141 n • 1 _ J �'>O 5• Columbuv dl�. �-• aT�� 1• •� ■ :(�.ifY ��1 S, Sch 25 is 13' f' sr • ��ffffffr,M--►,■L�/ !1 120 y '!.-'a• r7• = 1 J ; =a Y •/ ==fJcr I 1 - 5 ---_.trc�- _-jPj - \�'fO •� � -;� � Ca yy1. CM'M Zi I SiZO.a IaC r I A �� _i T r t' + I. �� fti -w i ST `• TN Lamb - — --- ProjectVicinityR -�D�i r ..•���°:• _ �� L' _ s,n1e c.,�.�•' .� .ount}' � -11 1 �'- Ce Project Location \� � �!!6 .: •.� CG � � �..rt - . •� �: � _ ` �,r �� Orange County 1, \� ��.,; - cQw. a.i.•• - -,/-. �s 6M 10 ■ 1� 40 or �' -!\h f LSA N a 1000 2000 FEET SOURCE: USGS 7.5"UMJM-T LEGEND MProject Location rus„n ii7511, ter, mxd (6/15/2022) FIGURE 1 Town Center Plaza Project Protect Location and Vicinity I:\FRC2201\GIS\MXD{' "Lc 5h Fruit St Daum: - 916 for eI i BntStjw ,f jF r ah CO'1111. •gI., M-21tLac-lil AW o r s' 6mft. : vvvv 400 05�4: o Ic 4th St= E - - AWL- t yt HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J METHODS ARCHIVAL RESEARCH LSA completed archival research during the months of January, May, and June 2022. Research methods focused on the review of a variety of primary and secondary source materials relating to the history and development of the project area. Sources included, but were not limited to, online sources, published literature in local and regional history, news articles, historic aerial photographs, and historic maps. The primary historical themes identified are post -World War II commercial development in Santa Ana and architecture. FIELD SURVEY Field surveys were conducted on January 18 and May 31, 2022. In January, LSA architectural historian Casey Tibbet and LSA photographer Dennis Lechner conducted a survey of all four buildings as part of a due diligence report. During the survey, Mr. Lechner took numerous photographs of the exterior of the buildings, as well as overviews of the property and setting and architectural details. Ms. Tibbet made detailed notations regarding the structural and architectural characteristics and current conditions of the buildings and associated features. The pair then conducted a brief reconnaissance survey of the vicinity to determine whether the project area is within a potential historic district. On May 31, 2022, a follow-up field survey was conducted by LSA architectural historian Eugene Heck and LSA photographer Dennis Lechner. The purpose of the follow-up survey was to consider Town Center Plaza in relation to the 174-acre Parkcenter development that surrounds it. Using historic aerial photographs and contemporaneous newspaper photographs, Mr. Heck identified and field - checked 18 individual commercial, residential, and landscaped (park) areas within Parkcenter, starting with Town Center Plaza. The extensive fieldwork included photographing and making detailed observations of apartment complexes, tract houses, commercial developments, shopping centers, and parks within the area bounded by Tustin Avenue to the east, 17th Street to the north, Mabury Street and North Cabrillo Park Drive to the west, and 1st Street to the south. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 775 10/3/2023 4 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J RESULTS RESEARCH Early Settlement In 1810, Jose Antonio Yorba and his nephew, Juan Pablo Peralta, received a land grant from the Spanish civil governor of Alta California. Sergeant Yorba had served with the Portola Expedition, which explored the area of the current project in 1769. The Yorbas and the Peraltas were two of the most prominent families in Alta California. Yorba named the land Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. The land grant consisted of around 63,000 acres covering 25 miles between the Santa Ana River, the mountains to the east, and the ocean. No other rancho from the Spanish or Mexican Period is entirely located within today's Orange County boundaries (Marsh 1994). Settlement of the region was facilitated by the partitioning of Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana in 1868. Partitioning allowed Americans such as Abel Stearns, E. Glassell, and Jacob Ross to acquire rights to large tracts of land. William Henry Spurgeon and his brother, Granville, both natives of Kentucky, came to California during the Gold Rush. The Granville brothers and an associate, Ward Bradford, searched the area between Tustin City and the Santa Ana River, looking for a potential townsite location. In October 1869, Ward Bradford and William Henry Spurgeon purchased 74 acres of land from Jacob Ross, who had purchased a portion of the rancho land (Parker 1963). They bought the land for approximately $8 per acre (Parker 1963). After the purchase, Bradford took the westerly half of the land and Spurgeon the easterly half. Bradford soon sold off his interest in the land and moved from the area. Spurgeon began mapping what was to become the Santa Ana townsite, named for the valley and the rancho. Spurgeon had the townsite surveyed by George Wright, and on December 13, 1870, Spurgeon recorded a map of his new community (Parker 1963). The new subdivision consisted of 24 blocks with 10 lots each (Tibbet 2008). The boundaries of the new townsite were 7th Street on the north, 1st Street on the south, West Street (now Broadway) on the west, and Spurgeon Street on the east (Friis 1965). (This area is located 1.7 miles west of the current project area.) Spurgeon constructed a road between Santa Ana and a ford called Rodriquez crossing, which crossed the Santa Ana River west of Orange. This new road enabled the stage line that ran between Los Angeles and San Diego to come through Santa Ana before it continued in a southeasterly direction to Tustin City and San Juan Capistrano. The stage stopped twice weekly delivering passengers and mail at Spurgeon's store at the corner of Broadway and 4th Street. In 1877, an effort was initiated by several businessmen to convince the Southern Pacific Railroad (SP) to extend its line from Anaheim to Santa Ana (Sapphos 2011). James H. Fruit and James McFadden joined Spurgeon and organized the Western Development Company. The company raised enough funds to pay the SP a bonus and purchase 160 acres of land northeast of and adjacent to the original Santa Ana townsite (Swanner 1953). The Western Development Company named the new area "Santa Ana East" (Sapphos 2011). It plotted the tract with streets running parallel with and at Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 776 10/3/2023 5 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J right angles to the railroad tracks. Once the SP claimed the land it needed for a depot (1878), the company subdivided the remaining acreage into business lots (Parker 1963). On June 1, 1886, with a population of approximately 2,000, Santa Ana was incorporated (City of Santa Ana n.d.). William Henry Spurgeon, founder of the city, was elected mayor. Two years later the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway arrived. The Santa Ana and Tustin Street Railroad was running along First; the Santa Ana and Westminster Railroad on Second; and the Santa Ana, Orange & Tustin Street Railway connected the SP depot with downtown Santa Ana. By the close of the 1880s, the commercial core of Santa Ana remained five city blocks centered at 4th and Main Streets. One- and two-story brick buildings predominated. Merchants resisted the SP and were reluctant to relocate or open new business establishments in Santa Ana East, close to the depot, as was hoped for by its developers (Parker 1963). Between 1890 and 1920, many homes were built in Santa Ana East, approximately 20 square blocks of them comprise the French Park National Register District (Marsh 1994; City of Santa Ana n.d.). Commercial development was spurred along 4th Street by the arrival in 1906 of the Pacific Electric Railway's "Red Cars" (Friis 1965). Downtown Santa Ana was the site of important civic growth. In 1901, the Orange County Courthouse was completed (extant; Preserve Orange County 2018). In 1903, W.H. Spurgeon donated land to build a library funded by Andrew Carnegie (demolished; Carnegie Libraries 2009). A new City Hall was erected at the intersection of Third and Main Street in 1904 (Pacific Coast Architecture Database 2005-2022). Regrettably, Santa Ana's Chinatown, at the intersection of Bush and 3rd Streets, was destroyed by fire in 1906 (Orange County Register 2022). A city inspection had reportedly uncovered a case of leprosy there (Swanner 1953). At the turn of the 20th century the project area was outside the Santa Ana city limits and the town of Tustin was unincorporated. An early map of the Tustin Road District shows the Mabury Tract, an irregular shape bordered by 17th Street on the north. As shown on the map, many of the lots were owned by the "Mabury Trust Company" (McBride 1913). Hiram Mabury Except where noted, the following section is adapted from the Pacific Bank Handbook of California, by Pacific Bank 1888. Hiram Mabury (1825-1903) was born in Allegheny City, Pennsylvania, and remained there attending school and educating himself in business until age 18, when he moved to southern Indiana and entered the mercantile career. He displayed such energy, foresight, and general ability that he was chosen to manage three Ohio River steamers and remained in command until 1864. No record was found indicating that he served either the Union or the Confederacy during the Civil War. He was one of the organizers and builders of the first railroad from Louisville to Indianapolis. He founded the First National Bank of Jeffersonville, Indiana, and was Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 777 10/3/2023 6 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J an active promoter of the Ohio Falls Car Company, a heavy industry. He was also associated with the Bank of Kentucky and the Bank of Louisville. In 1866, he visited California, and being pleased with the climate, people, and prospects, he decided to make his home in San Francisco. In March 1888, he relocated to San Jose and was identified with that city until his death. He was so active in banking and finance that his mug book biographer dubbed him "The Father of Banks of the Pacific Coast." Besides his large part in building San Jose's Woolen Mills, Street Railway, and Water Works, he was either the leader or one of the prime movers in organizing and developing the following banks: • Pacific Bank of San Francisco • San Jose Savings Bank • Consolidated National Bank of San Diego • First National Bank of Los Angeles • Bank of Anaheim • Commercial Bank of Santa Ana • Salinas City Bank • Bank of San Jose • First National Bank of Fresno • Bank of Tulare • Bank of Selma • Bank of Pasadena • Bank of Riverside • Garden City Bank He had interests in several other savings banks, was a large investor in the Los Angeles Street Railway, and was an extensive landowner throughout Southern California. At the time of his death, he was one of the owners of the ferry system across the Ohio River between Jeffersonville and Louisville, Kentucky (Los Angeles Times 1903). Like James Irvine (1827-1886), Llewellen Bixby (1825-1896), and other California land barons, Hiram Mabury invested for the long-term. Hiram and his wife, Josephine, had two sons and five daughters (Los Angeles Times 1903). Although he occasionally turned a quick profit, as in the case of his real estate investment near MacArthur Park, which went on to become the site of the Downtown Branch of the Los Angeles Public Library (Los Angeles Times 1925), his overall strategy was to keep his land holdings intact, living off the income generated by operations such as ranching, oil leases, and growing Valencia oranges in Orange County. To protect the family fortune, he formed the H & J Mabury Trust Company of Boston, Massachusetts (Los Angeles Times 1925). At some point, perhaps around the time of Hiram's passing, the trust was reorganized as the H & J Mabury Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 778 10/3/2023 7 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J Company (California Secretary of State var.). His widow Josephine moved to Los Angeles to be near her sons (Ancestry.com var.; Oakland Tribune 1912). There was a great scandal in 1912, involving one of the daughters, who committed suicide after being arrested in New York for concealing gems in her hat to avoid paying customs duties (Napa Weekly Journal 1912). Project Area The current project area was at one time a portion of approximately 400 acres owned by the H & J Mabury Company, known locally as "The Mabury Ranch," between 1st and 17th Streets, Mabury Street, and Tustin Avenue (Santa Ana Orange County Register 1939). On the eve of World War II, the Mabury Ranch manager expressed confidence in the future of the citrus industry. He was repurchasing 10 acres of former company orange groves at the southeast corner of the intersection of 17th and Mabury Street (currently the site of an El Polio Loco restaurant; Santa Ana Orange County Register 1939). This gave the H & J Mabury Company, except for one or two properties, solid frontage of land from 1st Street to 17th Street on Mabury Street (Santa Ana Orange County Register 1939). A comparison of historic aerial photographs of the area shows two small housing tracts were built in the 1950s and Interstate 5, but it was not until the 1970s that the orange groves markedly begin to disappear (Aerial Photographs var.). Plans to develop the 174-acre Mabury Ranch were unveiled by the 0. K. Earl Corporation of Pasadena at a Santa Ana City Council meeting (Los Angeles Times 1970). Known as the "Mabury Orchards" project, Earl estimated it would take 7 to 10 years to complete, at a cost of $100 million (Los Angeles Times 1970). About 50 acres had been developed when the project was transferred to the Earl Development Corporation, a newly formed subsidiary of the 0. K. Earl Corporation, headed by Senior Vice President Donald A. McGilvray (Los Angeles Times 1971 and 1972). Don McGilvray (1924-1987) was an influential developer who went on to form Parkcenter Corporation, acquiring all the development rights to the remaining 125 acres from H & J Mabury Co. (Los Angeles Times 1975 and 1987; California Secretary of State var.). He had earlier expressed his views regarding speculative building in a panel discussion before the industrial development committee of the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce: The investor should count on taking no more than 12 to 18 months to lease the completed building. In deciding when to break ground for a speculative structure, he advised that speculators "Pick a time of prosperity. If you pick the wrong business cycle, you may have no takers, and time, in our business, is money." Build all-purpose, flexible structures, 10,000 to 25,000 square feet in size. To allow for future expansion of tenants, the builder should avoid overbuilding his lot. He called for flexibility in leasing; small firms taking a short- term lease are often willing to pay more than a long-term occupant (Los Angeles Times 1965a). It was McGilvray who commissioned Don C. Fassknacht and Associates, an architectural landscape firm based in Tustin, to do site planning and environmental concepts for a 290-unit garden apartment complex on Cabrillo Park Drive at 15th Street; about half of the 11.24-acre site was dedicated to open space and landscaping (Los Angeles Times 1973a and 1973b). McGilvray and his team of former 0. K. Earl executives may be responsible for the high quality of much of Parkcenter's Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 779 10/3/2023 8 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J architecture and landscape architecture because they retained architectural control of the development after selling the land to individual developers (Santa Ana Orange County Register 1977). Sunset Builders, owned by Robert Porter Gillman, has been identified as the builder of 1971 East 4th Street (City of Santa Ana var.). Bob Gillman (1930-1999) had worked as a farm hand on a ranch at 4612 Baranca Road in his youth; he served as an aircraft mechanic in the Air Force Reserve throughout the 1950s and 1960s, and he met his wife while stationed in Fairbanks, Alaska (Ancestry.com var.). In 1961, he was pictured with the Director of Civil Defense for Orange County, a retired Air Force Major, checking plans for the construction of civilian residential fallout shelters (Tustin News 1961). During the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962, his reserve unit was called to active duty and sent to Florida for 1 month (Petaluma Argus Courier 1987). Sunset Builders and Ken Himes were identified as the architect and builder of 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, the third office building constructed in Town Center Plaza (City of Santa Ana var.). They also are the architect and builder for El Rancho Plaza at 421 North Brookhurst Street in Anaheim (Los Angeles Times 1965b and 1965c). Adjacent to the El Rancho Plaza buildings, at 511 North Brookhurst Street, is a building that bears a striking resemblance to 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, the third of the Town Center Plaza buildings (Google Streetview). Mr. Himes was not listed in the 1970 edition of American Architects Directory. He is a licensed architect in the states of California and Washington (California Secretary of State var.). Various news articles show Mr. Himes has designed many buildings, primarily in Southern California in the 1970s and 1980s as a partner in Kenneth R. Himes and Associates, Himes-Peters, and Himes Peters Jepson (Tibbet 2022). There is no evidence indicating that Mr. Himes' work has influenced the course of architectural development. Postwar Growth and Suburbanization Except where noted, this section is adapted from Tract Housing in California, 1945-1973: A Context for National Register Evaluation, by the California Department of Transportation 2011. The population of the United States grew by more than 50 percent between 1940 and 1970, from about 132 million residents to just over 203 million. This growth was not uniform across the country, but varied greatly by region, within regions, and even within metropolitan areas. Generally, the Western states (from the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific Coast) grew at a much greater rate than the rest of the country during this period. Rural populations declined across the country, relative to metropolitan areas. In the 1950s alone, more than 10 million Americans moved from farms to urban or suburban areas. A substantial majority of the population growth in the postwar era occurred in the suburbs. The proportion of the U.S. population living in suburbs grew slowly in the period between the two World Wars, from 15 to 20 percent. However, by 1970 more than a third of all Americans lived in the suburbs and the nation's approximately 75 million suburbanites for the first time exceeded the number of Americans living in cities. The United States had become a suburban nation. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 780 10/3/2023 9 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J California grew much more rapidly in the postwar period than most of the other regions of the country. Many servicemen who had been stationed in California bases during the war decided to settle in the State after being discharged, rather than returning to their home states. Job growth sparked by the defense economy brought migrants from across the country to California. As in the rest of the country, the postwar baby boom also played a significant role in the State's population growth. While California's population grew by 88 percent between 1950 and 1970 (from 10.6 million to 19.95 million), the number of school -age children quadrupled during this period. California ranked fifth in population among the states in the 1940 census, following New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Ohio. Comparison with Ohio illustrates California's dramatic growth in the postwar period. In 1940, the population of California was close to that of Ohio, with both states having slightly more than 6.9 million residents. Between 1940 and 1970, Ohio grew at the same rate as the country, about 54 percent, to 10.65 million. California's population nearly tripled during this same period, to almost 20 million, and was fast approaching a population twice that of Ohio. California passed New York to become the nation's most populous state in 1962. More than one in every 12 Americans now lived in California. The Postwar Economy The United States experienced nearly three decades of sustained economic growth following World War II. With much of the rest of the industrialized world ravaged by the war, the U.S. exported food and manufactured goods across the globe. Domestic spending on both industrial and consumer goods also drove postwar economic expansion. By 1973, the nation's gross national product had grown to three times what it had been in 1948. In the early postwar years, the high rate of household formation and the baby boom led to a dramatic increase in the purchase of consumer goods, such as household furniture, appliances, toys, and children's clothing. While overall consumer spending increased by 60 percent during the second half of the 1940s, spending on furniture and appliances increased by 240 percent. Americans purchased more than 11 million television sets and 20 million refrigerators from the end of the war to 1951. In California, wartime growth of industrial and military facilities set the stage for postwar prosperity. Military appropriations to the State, particularly for hi -tech research and development, remained high throughout the Cold War era, which of course included the Korean War and the Vietnam War. As a leading center for the aircraft and aerospace industries, Southern California benefitted enormously from military spending. Defense contracts and military bases became a pillar of the State's economy, along with manufacturing, agriculture, tourism, and the television and motion picture industries. Growth itself became an important part of the California economy, sustaining retail sales and a robust construction industry. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 781 10/3/2023 10 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT JULY 2022 Transportation and Suburban Growth TORN CENTER PLAZA L C A $ANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J /`�` Automobile purchases were another large part of the increase in consumer spending during the postwar years. Annual domestic production of automobiles rose from 2 million in 1946 to 8 million by 1955, while motor vehicle registrations more than doubled from about 26 million in 1945 to 54 million in 1956. This growth in auto ownership coincided with a decline in the use of buses, streetcars, and trains. Transit ridership within metropolitan areas of the U.S. peaked in 1947 and began a long, steady decline thereafter. The geographical spread and low population densities of the postwar suburbs, combined with the increasing dispersion of employment and shopping centers, made transit impractical for most people living outside the older and denser urban areas. Los Angeles led the nation's major cities in both rates of auto ownership and abandonment of public transportation. By the end of the 1950s, 95 percent of all trips in Los Angeles were by private automobile. As in the rest of the United States, much of the postwar housing boom in California predated the construction of the Interstate. In general, freeway construction was neither a cause nor a means of metropolitan expansion in the late 1940s and 1950s. President Eisenhower signed the Federal Aid Highway Act into law in 1956, but many of California's most important freeways remained under construction more than a decade later. Before the war or shortly thereafter, if a freeway was planned, development would commence along its corridor, even though the actual construction of the freeway was years away. In many other areas, builders anticipated that existing roads and highways would be sufficient or would be improved and expanded to accommodate future growth. At the close of the 1940s, only a couple of freeways had been built, such as the North Sacramento freeway or Los Angeles's Arroyo Seco Parkway. Substantial extension of metropolitan freeways in the late 1960s and 1970s brought about a second phase of suburban growth more extensive than the initial postwar boom. At least initially, the new freeways allowed commuters to live farther from their places of work without a significant increase in commuting time. The benefit of more distant but less expensive land (and therefore more affordable housing) began to compete with the benefit of proximity to employment centers, leading to the explosive physical expansion of metropolitan areas. The migration of jobs from cities to suburbs followed close on the heels of suburban population growth. More than three-quarters of all new manufacturing and retail jobs created between 1950 and 1970 were in suburban areas. By 1973 suburban employment exceeded city employment. This later phase of postwar growth saw the beginning of "edge cities," with midrise and even high-rise office buildings and shopping malls forming new centers of employment, professional services, and retail trade, adjacent to freeway interchanges. Edge cities arose well beyond not only the older central cities and streetcar suburbs, but far beyond much of the earlier phase of postwar suburban growth as well. Pdiy °found (07/21/22) 18 - 782 10/3/2023 11 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J For example, although the East Bay suburbs between Oakland and San Jose experienced dramatic growth from the mid-1940s to the 1950s, by the late 1960s the fastest growth was in the east -of -East Bay communities situated along the BART line and the Interstate 680 corridor: Concord, Walnut Creek, and Pleasanton. Similarly, as the San Fernando Valley and the southerly suburbs of Los Angeles approached build -out in the mid-1960s, housing construction moved north, into Ventura County; east, into the Inland Empire communities of Riverside and San Bernardino counties; and especially south, into coastal Orange County. The postwar metropolitan region is often imagined as a central city dominated by a downtown business district and surrounded by bedroom suburbs. However, this image was accurate only briefly and then only as a snapshot of a constantly evolving metropolis. By the mid-1970s, most American metropolitan areas had become complex and multicentered entities with housing, retail, and employment widely dispersed across an area far greater than that of prewar metropolitan areas. Modernism and New Formalism Styles Except where noted, this section is adapted from "A History of American Architecture: Buildings in Their Cultural and Technological Context," by Mark Gelernter 1999. In the aftermath of the devastation wrought by World War II much of the world, including America, acquired a new enthusiasm for technology. This eventually influenced architecture. High Technology fully entered most people's lives during the 1950s and 1960s: commercial jets; televisions; landing a man on the moon. Many people believed that science and technology would solve most of the world's problems. People in the Third World (former colonies) mimicked the High Technology of Europe and America. Architectural ideas seen to be derived from High Technology spread throughout the world. This amounted to the triumph of Modernism, whose austere, ahistorical forms symbolized a break with the past and a shiny new age of peace and prosperity. It was the atomic age. The Modernist conception of design as rational problem -solving appealed to the generation that had similarly used rational problem -solving methods to tackle the logistical complexities of World War II. The Modernist emphasis on rational and efficient building techniques accorded well with the general enthusiasm for High Technology during this period. For both government and private corporations, the visual characteristics of the Modernist style seemed to sum up their own self-image: rational, efficient, confident possessors of immense power and wealth, and yet neither flashy nor desirous of individual expression. Architectural styles possess no single, intrinsic meaning. In the 1920s and 1930s, radical Modernism stood for Socialism and Collectivism. In the 1950s, Modernism stood for conservative American Government and American Free Enterprise (corporations). By the 1960s, the Modernist style had crossed all economic and political boundaries into: Communist countries of the Soviet Block; Social Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 783 10/3/2023 12 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J Democratic Western European countries; developing nations of the Third World. Most observers probably saw the same virtues in the Modernist style for the postwar era. Some valued the style because it was the official style of America, now the unquestioned leader of the Western world. American prestige helped spread Modernism, but the main ideas still came from Europe. Le Corbusier (1887-1965) was promoting a popular, influential version of Modernism. He moved beyond the white boxes of his 1920s designs to compose powerful forms like the Unite d'habitation, Marseille, France (1946-1952) and other projects. He moved away from thin stucco walls to massive concrete structures heavily modeled with external sun screens and other projections. Le Corbusier built these in roughly cast concrete ("biton brut") which frankly expressed the rough boarding framework into which the concrete was poured. Later known as "Brutalist" style, it was primarily a raw concrete construction technique, although the structures also had a primitive emotional presence. In the 1920s, Le Corbusier had proposed bulldozing central Paris "...to make way for free-standing towers, regularly lined up in the landscape." World War II destruction gave him the opportunity to put his ideas into practice. Unite d'habitation was a prototype; but one of what he wanted, which was an entire city of housing blocks standing on columns above the sweeping natural landscape, each one intended to replace an entire traditional neighborhood. Interior "streets" ran down the length of this prototype on every third floor, giving access to interlocking two-story tall apartments. Le Corbusier provided a variety of unit sizes, hoping to encourage a variety of social groups to live together. A shopping arcade in the middle of the block, playgrounds, and a gymnasium on the roof were meant to provide all the usual neighborhood amenities within the structure itself. Fundamentally, Le Corbusier saw Modernism as, "...a mechanism for re -engineering society." Le Corbusier's vision of pristine towers hovering above the landscape inspired many postwar Modernist architects and urban planners. But his Marseille scheme proved too controversial and too expensive; no further expansion was attempted. Many housing projects in Europe were in bombed -out city centers, and many were on the periphery. A popular variation of Le Corbusier's concept was the point -block or tower block, which "...piled more stories on a smaller footprint to create what was in essence a housing skyscraper." These stood clustered together on the landscape and often rivaled the old church spires as the most dominant features on the skyline. Many European governments embraced these new forms of housing as a fast, cheap way to rebuild and a way to control the endless spread of suburbs during the baby boom. It was affordable housing for a wider range of social classes — government supported. American cities were not bombed out, but decades of middle-class "white flight" to suburbs left city cores surrounded by a disproportionate number of poor people, Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 784 10/3/2023 13 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT JULY 2022 TORN CENTER PLAZA L C A $ANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J /`�` usually racial minorities. Money too fled the cities with the middle classes, leaving many neighborhoods with a crumbling housing stock and decaying services. Conditions seemed so dire President Truman signed the Housing Act of 1949, giving government authority to compel land acquisition in city centers. Government then sold or leased the land to redevelopment agencies who constructed state - subsidized housing for the poor. "Urban renewal," as it was euphemistically known, represented the continuing legacy of Roosevelt's New Deal efforts to solve problems by means of extensive federal intervention. As in prewar Federal Housing projects, the architects and planners chose not to reconstruct traditional rows of houses on streets; they chose to construct Le Corbusier's housing towers in urban parks. In America, wrecking balls and bulldozers cleared the way, funded by federal tax dollars. Adding to the destruction was President Eisenhower's Interstate Highway Act of 1956, linking together most of America's largest cities and towns. The Interstate shot into commercial centers of cities, irreparably splitting old neighborhoods in two and providing an even easier route for those fleeing to suburbs. In America, Le Corbusier's idyllic landscape quickly deteriorated into asphalt parking lots and uncultivated dirt. Vandalism and crime were rampant in federal housing projects. Whether it was due to social factors or the physical design, it gave Modernism a black eye. Mies van der Rohe (1886-1969), student of Peter Behrens, was the other great Modernist architect of this time. Mies headed the Bauhaus for 3 years until Nazis closed the school in 1933. He went to the United States in 1938, where he became director of the Armour Institute (later known as the Illinois Institute of Technology), in Chicago. Far less interested in the social aspect of architecture than Le Corbusier, Mies saw buildings as technical and visual problems to be solved. His motto was "less is more." He wanted architecture to reveal fundamental essence ("form follows function"). His technique was to build a simple and rational structural cage onto which he hung an external cladding system completely subservient to the structure's inherent geometrical grid. Because the cladding system was now reduced to a thin and lightweight veneer of glass, it came to be known as a curtain wall, acknowledging that it simply hung like a curtain from the frame to protect the insides of the building from the weather. Skidmore, Owings and Merrill (SOM) had earlier experimented with a number of these ideas, but Mies clarified and perfected them. Mies offered low-rise and high-rise versions of his style. The campus for Illinois Institute of Technology was the low-rise idea. He placed several freestanding pavilions on a rational planning grid, each one comprised of simple boxes with flat roofs. Each building was itself strictly planned on a rational cartesian grid, which established the location of the structure, the walls and openings. The high-rise idea is exemplified by the Seagram Building in New York City, 1954-58 (Phillip Johnson as associate architect). The Seagram Building is a simple box strictly Pdiy °found (07/21/22) 18 - 785 10/3/2023 14 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT JULY 2022 TORN CENTER PLAZA L C A $ANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J /`�` organized with a regular grid. There are no visual surprises or complexities. Careful proportions, the studied craft of simplicity, and the inexorable regularity of repeating elements are its character -defining features. Mies had to fireproof the steel frame with concrete, so the metal we see on the outside of the building is not the real structure but rather a veneer simulating the structure. The aesthetic desire for a certain appearance inevitably overcame the philosophical desire to express everything truthfully. Like Le Corbusier, Mies lifted the Seagram Building off the ground to form an entry lobby and to create a sense of the outdoors flowing through the building. He also set the building back from the street and apart from its neighbors on a public plaza, treating it as an isolated object in space rather than as an infill in a continuous streetline of buildings. Mies had a pure vision of his glass boxes, uncorrupted by the visual clutter of the city around them. If he could not build on a campus like ITT, he would carve out a little park. So where once only major public buildings like town halls or churches stood apart from the city in their own plazas or town squares, now private corporate headquarters were elevated to the same status. One Miesian building set back from the continuous facade of buildings stands alone as a jewel; an entire street of them set back in their plaza radically alters the urban setting. Many admired the way in which these plazas opened up the cramped, crowded cities. When a large number of Miesian buildings in their plazas clustered together, it became a source of civic pride. Los Angeles, Denver, Atlanta, Hong Kong; the city began to exude the image Le Corbusier envisioned: gleaming, hi -tech centers of commerce and industry, unencumbered by the past and looking boldly to the future. However, as the future unfolded these curtain -walled boxes posing as corporate headquarters, office parks, government buildings, apartment buildings, schools, and shopping centers caused many to question whether an abstracted ideal vision is preferable to a more nuanced approach, designing differently for different locations. To these architects and critics "Less is a bore." The Modernist vision looked windswept and barren, devoid of the hustle and bustle, visual and sensory richness, and spatial enclosure of traditional urban streets. In the 1950s and early 1960s, even as Modernism was sweeping across America, they sensed that it had lost sight of art or beauty in favor of constructional efficiency. They were well aware of the virtues of a rational constructional system, but the work did not express the highest cultural aspirations of what was now the most powerful nation on earth. These architects were known as the New Formalists or Neo-neo-Classicists. As the name suggests, many turned to traditional Classical ideas for inspiration. They explored various ways in which the basic frame and cover box could be elaborated or even decorated to provide a more elegant or commanding presence. After all, the Classical temple was based on a rational grid of columns and beams, just like a Miesian glass box. Many New Formalists, including Edward Durell Stone, Minoru Yamasaki, and Philip Johnson, played out Modernist variations on Classical forms. Pdiy °found (07/21/22) 18 - 786 10/3/2023 15 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J The American Embassy in New Delhi, India, exemplifies Stone's approach. He wrapped a Classical colonnade around a simple box, although he replaced the usual thick stone columns with astringently thin gilded steel supports. He further modernized and dematerialized the walls of the box itself, constructing them of perforated terrazzo blocks which served as sun screens. Perforated screens in masonry and aluminum, and the extensive use of richly gilded surfaces and structures, were among the character -defining features of this style. The master architect Philip Johnson also explicitly referred to the Classical temple in his Sheldon Memorial Art Gallery, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1963. Here he even hints at a Roman arcade, with the flattened arches smoothly bridging between the sharp -edged columns. Yet, the overall effect is decidedly modern. Each bay looks like a giant panel that was stamped out by an industrial process, like the one that stamps out car doors, while the open bays at the center of the entrance reveal a Miesian frame and glass infill. Although examples of the New Formalism can be found scattered around the country, the idea never caught on extensively. From the strictly Modernist point of view, the forms returned too explicitly to the discredited traditional styles. Their constructional realities were too often disguised or obscured. From a traditionalist point of view, the lack of detail failed to moderate the scale and bulk of what were still in reality large Modernist boxes. Both sides tended to view these buildings as lacking in substance. They may also be viewed as tentative precursors to Postmodernism, the architectural movement of the 1970s and 1980s that attempted to bridge the gap between the modern and the traditional. Previous Studies In January 2022, LSA prepared a due diligence report that included preliminary research and field observations for the project area (Tibbet 2022). As part of that study, input was sought from various historical groups and individuals. The feedback provided suggested that the project area might be part of the Parkcenter development and that Parkcenter may be an important planned development in Santa Ana. It was also suggested that the project area (Town Center Plaza) be looked at in the context of the overall Parkcenter development. The cohesive design aesthetic of the four buildings in the project area was also noted. This input was taken into consideration as part of this study. FIELD SURVEY January 2022 During the January 2022 survey, all four buildings in the project area were intensively surveyed although only the building at 1971 East 4th Street is 50 years of age (Figures 3-9). The building is described below. This beige, three-story commercial building has dark brown trim. It is rectangular in plan, wood or steel framed, and rests on a poured concrete foundation. Exterior wall cladding is textured stucco. The composition roof is flat, with a low-pitched parapet visibly clad in red clay Spanish tiles. Broad eaves extend beyond a cantilevered balcony, which is arcaded and has simple metal railing. The Pdiy °found (07/21/22) 18 - 787 10/3/2023 16 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA L S A JULY 2022 SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA fagade is symmetrical and centered on a monumental arched entry projecting above the parapet. The entry extends the full length of the building's minor east -west axis. The symmetrical fagade on the other side of the building is identical; in effect, there are two primary elevations. The balcony's arcade of two dozen bays is repeated and extended to the minor elevations. The office suites are arranged in a grid centered on the elevator shaft. Eleven -foot -tall ceilings define the proportions of their wood surround door openings and glass curtain wall panels. Figure 3: 1971 East 4th Street, facade. View to the east (1/18/22). Figure 4: 1971 East 4th Street, south and east elevations. View to the northwest (1/18/22). Play°tounci�(07/Z1i22) 18 - 788 10/3/2023 17 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA L S A JULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Figure 5: 1971 East 4th Street, north elevation and fa§ade (west elevation). View to the southeast (1/18/22). Figure 6: 1971 East 4th Street, exterior stairway, east elevation. View to the north (1/18/22). Pdiy °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 789 10/3/2023 18 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA L S A JULY 2022 SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA Figure 7: 1971 East 4th Street, second floor hallway. View to the west (1/18/22). Figure 8: 1971 East 4th Street, second level, center of the building. View to the south toward courtyard surrounded by office suites (1/18/22). There is a similar courtyard to the north. Pdiy °touncif (07/21i22) 18 - 790 10/3/2023 19 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J Figure 9: 1971 East 4th Street, second level, courtyard. View to the north toward the center of the building shows the third story office (1/18/22). The building reads from the street as two stories; the third floor consists of one small office space over the entry, accessed by stairs. Exterior staircases at the corners of the building have pebblestone treads, and distinctive railings of wood and metal. The staircases have metal stringers. Brick masonry walls are seen by the corner staircases and by the elevator shaft on the second floor, where they have arched openings with metal gates accessing two small "courtyards." The building is in good condition. Other than the usual modifications made by the tenants to the interior spaces, there were no signs of significant alterations. At a little over 40,000 square feet, it may be classified as a medium-sized office building. Mature pine trees line gently sloping ground toward 4th Street; mature palm trees line the drive toward the center of the project area (Town Center Plaza). This building is the oldest of four built between 1971 and 1978; together, they comprise the small business park known as Town Center Plaza. The building was designed on a grid and likewise, the business park was laid out on a grid that determined the relationships between the buildings. Central to the modernist design is the "plaza," a large open area, in this case an asphalt concrete paved parking lot. The second oldest building in the park is 1901 East 4th Street (1974; Figure 10). It has a square plan and textured stucco walls, with red Spanish clay roof tiles, cantilevered balconies, and arches. More importantly, its notable design features and motifs tie it to the other buildings, as do minor details. For example, the distinctive wood and metal railing seen at 1971 is again seen at 1901, as are the pebblestone treads, but this time the staircase stringers are wood, not metal. As a modernized version of a Southern California Spanish Colonial Revival regional identity dating back to Arthur Benton and Charles Lummis, these buildings complement each other. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 791 10/3/2023 20 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J Ak MEft -_ Figure 10: 1901 East 4th Street, south and east elevations. View to the northwest (1/18/22). The third and fourth buildings completed in the park are more closely related to each other than to the first two, although they all share many features (Figures 11 and 12). Ken Himes is known to have designed 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive (1976) and likely designed 515 North Cabrillo Park Drive (1978) as well (City of Santa Ana var.; Los Angeles Times 1975). With these buildings, abstraction has progressed a bit further from regional identity, eschewing balconies, toward more classic, temple - like facades. The articulated horizontal bands on both 525 and 515 are notable. Each of the four buildings stands as a separate object in space, related by materials, workmanship, and design. They do not crowd each other. The outer lot lines of the parcels form the business park boundaries. May 2022 The focus of the May 2022 survey was threefold: To determine whether the 174-acre Parkcenter development has any cohesive design elements such as complementary architectural styles, signage, streetlights, street trees, or other features that identify it as a planned development; 2. To determine if the Parkcenter development has any potential to be a historic district; and To determine whether the Town Center Plaza displays any design features that connect it to or identify it as part of the Parkcenter development. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 792 10/3/2023 21 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA L S A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA LM Figure 11: 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive, facade. View to the north (1/18/22). Figure 12: 515 North Cabrillo Park Drive, facade. View to the north (1/18/22). The survey revealed that the Parkcenter development does not have a cohesive design aesthetic. Instead, it appears that although it may have been planned as a large mixed -use development, it was developed by individual entities with oversight by Parkcenter Corporation headed by McGilvray. Pdiy °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 793 10/3/2023 22 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J As a result, the 174-acre area has some well -designed properties, but it does not have any particular character or identity. Furthermore, most of the development, including three of the Town Center Plaza buildings, is not yet 50 years of age. At this time, based on this reconnaissance -level survey, Parkcenter does not appear to have the potential to be a historic district. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 794 10/3/2023 23 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION Based on the research results discussed above, the following sections present the historical significance evaluation of the building at 1971 East 4th Street in the project area under the California Register and local criteria to determine whether it qualifies as a "historical resource" for the purposes of CEQA. Although the other buildings in the project area are not yet 50 years of age, some consideration is given to the business park as a whole. DEFINITIONS CEQA (PRC Chapter 2.6, Section 21083.2 and California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 145, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15064.5) calls for the evaluation and recordation of historical resources. The criteria for determining the significance of impacts to historical resources are based on Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and Guidelines for the Nomination of Properties to the California Register. Properties eligible for listing in the California Register and subject to review under CEQA are those meeting the criteria for listing in the California Register, National Register, or designation under a local ordinance. California Register of Historical Resources The California Register criteria are based on National Register criteria. For a property to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register, one or more of the following criteria must be met: 1. It is associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method or construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; and/or 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the Nation. In addition to meeting one or more of the above criteria, the California Register requires that sufficient time has passed since a resource's period of significance to "obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource." Fifty years is used as a general estimate of time needed to develop the perspective to understand the resource's significance (CCR 4852 [d][2])• The California Register also requires that a resource possess integrity, which is defined as "the authenticity of an historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance" (California Office of Historic Preservation 1999:2). To retain integrity, a resource should have its original location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Which of these factors is most important depends on the Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 — 795 10/3/2023 24 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J particular criterion under which the resource is considered eligible for listing (California Office of Historic Preservation 1999). City of Santa Ana (Chapter 30-Places of Historical and Architectural Significance) Any person or group may request a building, or part thereof, structure, object, or site to be designated to be included on the city register of historical properties (called "register" in this section). The applicant must submit documentation that demonstrates how the nominated building, structure, object, or site satisfies the criteria for designation. A building, structure, object, or site may be designated for inclusion on the register if the building, structure, object, or site is 50 or more years old and if the commission finds that one or more of the following conditions are met: 1. Buildings, structures, or objects with distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period that exemplify a particular architectural style or design features 2. Works of notable architects, builders, or designers whose style influenced architectural development 3. Rare buildings, structures, or objects or original designs 4. Buildings, structures, objects, or sites of historical significance which include places: a. Where important events occurred; b. Associated with famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations and businesses; c. Which were originally present when the city was founded; or d. That served as important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity. 5. Sites of archaeological importance 6. Buildings or structures that were connected with a business or use which was once common, but is now rare EVALUATION The building at 1971 East 4th Street was constructed in 1971 and is being evaluated for historical significance in compliance with CEQA. It is one of four buildings in the approximately 8-acre Town Center Business Park, which was developed between 1971 and 1978. The building is evaluated below and on Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms (Appendix A) for historical significance under the criteria for listing in the California Register and for designation under the City's ordinance. Many of the City's criteria for designation are similar to those of the California Register. Where appropriate, the two sets of criteria have been combined to avoid redundancy. Play °touncif'07/21/22) 18 - 796 10/3/2023 25 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J ❖ California Register Criterion 1: Is associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. ❖ Santa Ana Criteria 4(a) and 4(d): Buildings, structures, objects or sites of historical significance which include places: (a) Where important events occurred; and (d) That served as important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity. This building is one of four buildings within the Town Center Plaza business park and the only one that has reached 50 years of age. Town Center Plaza is marginally associated with postwar (1945-1973) growth and suburbanization, since the building at 1971 East 4th Street was constructed at the end of this period. Town Center Plaza is within the 174-acre postwar (and beyond) mixed -use Parkcenter development area and is less than 2 miles east of Santa Ana's original business district. The Parkcenter area was among the last of the orange groves to be developed. Historic aerials show a gradual buildout of this area between Interstate 5, State Route 55, and 17th and 1st Streets during the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Many buildings in the area were constructed less than 50 years ago. Field survey observations outside the project area, however, did not confirm a level of visual cohesion sufficient to identify a potential historic district to which Town Center Plaza contributes. It is possible that additional research and the passage of time may warrant the formal evaluation of Parkcenter, but for now it remains outside the scope of the current study and, in any case, three of the four buildings in the Town Center Plaza are not yet 50 years of age. ❖ California Register Criterion 2: Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. ❖ Santa Ana Criterion 4(b): Buildings, structures, objects or sites of historical significance which include places: (b) Associated with famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations and businesses. The land is indirectly associated with Hiram Mabury, a 19th century venture capitalist who invested in California real estate and was active in banking. Mabury and his family owned land in Orange County but resided elsewhere. No famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations or businesses are associated with the building at 1971 East 4th Street or the Town Center Plaza business park. ❖ California Register Criterion 3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. ❖ Santa Ana Criteria 1 and 2: (1) Buildings, structures or objects with distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period, that exemplify a particular architectural style or design features; and (2) Works of notable architects, builders, or designers whose style influenced architectural development. The building has distinguishing characteristics of the Modern style including horizontal massing, a very low-pitched roof, interior courtyards and spaces designed to bring the outside in, recessed and protected entries, and glass walls. It also has characteristics of the New Formalism style such as the arches/arcades, monumental entrances, smooth wall surfaces, and delicate Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 797 10/3/2023 26 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J details like the stair railings. However, it is not a true representation of either style. No evidence was found that the building at 1971 East 4th Street is the work of a master architect, builder, or designer. While the building design incorporates interesting architectural details, it does not possess high artistic values because it does not epitomize the design principles of a particular style more fully than other buildings of a similar era and style. As a whole, Town Center Plaza has many of the distinguishing characteristics of the Modern and New Formalism styles and is clearly identifiable as a small business park. The designs, materials, workmanship, and landscaped setting all retain what appears to be a high level of integrity. However, none of these buildings are of exceptional importance and only the earliest of them, 1971 East 4th Street, has achieved 50 years of age. ❖ California Register Criterion 4: Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. ❖ Santa Ana Criterion 5: Sites of archaeological importance. This 1971 building was built of standard materials using standard building techniques; it is of no archaeological importance and is not likely to yield important information about history or prehistory. The following addresses the remaining Santa Ana criteria for designation. ❖ Santa Ana Criterion 3: Rare buildings, structures, or objects or original designs. The Town Center Plaza building at 1971 East 4th Street incorporates elements of the Modern and New Formalism styles, neither of which is rare in Orange County or the larger Southern California region. Business parks, such as Town Center Plaza, are also common throughout the area. ❖ Santa Ana Criterion 4(c): Buildings, structures, objects or sites of historical significance which include places which were originally present when the city was founded. The Town Center Plaza building at 1971 East 4th Street is a postwar commercial building; the business park was not present when the city was founded. ❖ Santa Ana Criterion 6: Buildings or structures that were connected with a business or use which was once common, but is now rare. The Town Center Plaza building at 1971 East 4th Street was never connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Most of the tenants provide professional services such as medical, legal, or financial. Town Center Plaza as a whole is a business park, which is a very common property type. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 798 10/3/2023 27 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J RECOMMENDATIONS As a result of the research and field survey, the commercial building at 1971 East 4th Street does not appear to be historically significant under either the California Register or City of Santa Ana criteria. It is not a historical resource as defined by CEQA. Although it is part of an approximately 8-acre phased development (Town Center Plaza) with a cohesive design aesthetic, the buildings are not exceptional examples of a particular style, and the development as a whole is less than 50 years old. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 799 10/3/2023 2s HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT JULY 2022 REFERENCES TORN CENTER PLAZA L C A $ANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J /`�` Aerial Photographs Var. 1980 and 1985 accessed online June 7, 2022 at: http://www.historicaerials.com and 1939 to 1990 accessed online June 7, 2022 at: https://www.ocgis.com/ocpw/historicaIimagery/. Ancestry.com Var. A variety of records were accessed online in January and June 2022 at: http://home. ancestry.com/. These include city directories, voter registration records, and United States Census Data. California Department of Transportation 2011 Tract Housing in California, 1945-1973: A Context for National Register Evaluation. Sacramento: Caltrans. California Office of Historic Preservation 1999 California Register and National Register: A Comparison (for purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register), OHP Technical Assistance Series #6. California Secretary of State Var. bizfile Online. Records accessed June 2, 2022 at: http://sos.ca.gov/. Carnegie Libraries 2009 Santa Ana, Orange County. Accessed online in June 2022 at: https://www.carnegie- libraries.org/california/santaana.html City of Santa Ana n.d. City of Santa Ana website accessed June 12, 2022 at: http://www.ci.santa- ana.ca.us/library/history/timeline.asp. Var. Building Permits provided by City staff. On file at the City of Santa Ana. Friis, Leo J. 1965 Orange County Through Four Centuries. Pioneer Press, Santa Ana California, California. Gelernter, Mark 1999 A History of American Architecture: Buildings in Their Cultural and Technological Context. University Press of New England. Lebanon, NH. Los Angeles Times 1903 Millionaire Financier Dead in San Jose. July 8, page A4. 1925 Thousands Percent Yearly. January 1, page C18. 1965a Speculative Industrial Building: Take a Chance and Think Small. July 7, pages 49 and 55. 1965b Office Center Ground Broken. September 19, page 210. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 800 10/3/2023 29 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT JULY 2022 TORN CENTER PLAZA L C A $ANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J /`�` 1965c Photo Standalone 29—No Title. September 19, page M26. 1970 Mabury Ranch Development Plans Outlined. April 8, page 56. 1971 Earl Forms New Division. September 12, page 157. 1972 Republic Title in New Offices. March 12, page 149. 1973a 2 Streets Completed. July 1, page 142. 1973b Fassknacht to Lay Out Site. August 12, page 97. 1975 Parkcenter Corp. Buys Old Santa Ana Ranch. August 10, page 66. 1976 3rd Parkcenter Plaza Building Rising in Santa Ana. January 11, page 105. 1987 Obituary McGilvray, Donald Alexander, Jr. March 23, page 34. 1999 Obituary Gillman, Bob. October 17, page 450. Marsh, Dianne 1994 Santa Ana, an Illustrated History. Heritage Publishing, Encinitas, California. McBride, J.L. 1913 Plat Book of Orange County. H.S. Crocker and Company, Los Angeles, California. Napa Weekly Journal 1912 Couldn't Face Disgrace: Caught in Attempt to Smuggle in Jewels, Woman of a Wealthy Family Commits Suicide. March 22, page 1. Oakland Tribune 1912 Confesses Evading Customs Duties. March 20, page 2. Orange County Register 2022 Santa Ana Apologizes for 1906 Burning of its Chinatown. May 24. Accessed online in June 2022. Pacific Bank 1888 Pacific Bank Handbook of California, page 13. Accessed online June 2, 2022 at: https:// www.google.com/books/edition/Pacific_Bank_Handbook_of_California/vCSR9VK81JUC?hl =en&gbpv=l&dq=%22H iram+Mabury%22&pg=PA13&printsec=frontcover. Pacific Coast Architecture Database 2005-2022 City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana City Hall #3, Santa Ana, CA. Accessed online in June 2022 at: https:Hpcad.lib.washington.edu/building/14076/. Parker, C.E. and Marilyn 1963 Orange County: Indians to Industry. First American Title Insurance and Trust Company, Santa Ana, California. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 801 10/3/2023 30 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA � C A A DULY 2022 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA J Petaluma Argus-Courier 1987 Reunion of former aircraft mechanics set this weekend. August 26, page 2. Preserve Orange County 2018 Old Orange County Courthouse. Accessed online in June 2022 at: https://www. preserveorangecounty.org/places/2018/8/9/old-orange-county- courthouse#:—:text=The%20courthouse%2C%20which%20occupied%20an,inside%20thos e%20h a l is%20of%20j ustice. Santa Ana Orange County Register 1939 Addition to Orange Acreage Shows Confidence In Future. April 20, page 13. 1977 There's Building In Santa Ana. April 10, pages 1-7 and 10. Sapphos Environmental, Inc. 2011 Historic American Buildings Survey, 501 East Fifth St. (Whitson-Powelson House): HABS No. CA-2839. Accessed online May 28, 2022, at: https:Htile.loc.gov/storage- services/master/pnp/habshaer/ca/ca3700/ca3766/data/ca3766data.pdf Swanner, Charles D. 1953 Santa Ana: A Narrative of Yesterday, 1870-1910. Saunders Press, Claremont, California. Tibbet, Casey 2008 Cultural Resources Assessment: 601 and 611-613 East Santa Ana Boulevard, City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. 2022 Due Diligence Study for Four Properties at the Northeast Corner of East 4th Street and North Cabrillo Park Drive in the City of Santa Ana, California. Tustin News 1961 Local Tract Homes' Fallout Shelters Set. August 24, page 5. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1981 Tustin, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. Play °touncif �07/21/22) 18 - 802 10/3/2023 31 HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TOWN CENTER PLAZA L S A JULY 2022 SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA APPENDIX A DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION (DPR) 523 FORMS Pdiy°6ouncif`07/Z1i22> 18 - 803 10/3/2023 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary # HRI # Trinomial NRHP Status Code Page 1 of 6 Resource Name or #: 1971 East 4th Street P1. Other Identifier: Town Center Plaza *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ❑x Unrestricted *a. County: Orange and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Tustin, CA Date: 1981 T 5S ; R 9W ; Section: 8; S.B.B.M. c. Address: 1971 East 4th Street City: Santa Ana Zip: d. UTM: Zone: 11; mE/ mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource): Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 400-051-02: in a business park with three other properties and buildings at the northeast corner of East 4th Street and North Cabrillo Park *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This beige, three-story commercial building has dark brown trim. It is rectangular in plan, wood or steel framed, and rests on a poured concrete foundation. The exterior wall cladding is textured stucco. The composition roof is flat, with a low-pitched parapet visibly clad in red clay Spanish tiles. Broad eaves extend beyond a cantilevered balcony, which is arcaded and has simple metal railing. The fagade is symmetrical and centered on a monumental arched entry projecting above the parapet. The entry extends the full length of the building's minor east -west axis. The symmetrical fagade on the other side of the building is identical; in effect, there are two primary elevations. The balcony's arcade of two dozen bays is repeated and extended to the minor elevations. The office suites are arranged in a grid centered on the elevator shaft. Eleven -foot -tall ceilings define the proportions of their wood surround door openings and glass curtain wall panels. See Continuation Sheet *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP6-1 to 3 story commercial building *P4. Resources Present: ❑x Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ❑Element of District ❑Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) See Continuation Sheet P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) Fagade, view to the east (1/18/22) *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: OHistoric ❑ Prehistoric ❑Both 1971 (building permit) *P7. Owner and Address: Unknown *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address) Eugene Heck, M.A. Casey Tibbet, M.A. LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92507 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18 and May 31, 2022 *1310. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Historic Resources Assessment, Town Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, 2022. Prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑x Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑x Continuation Sheet ❑x Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (List): i� Council 18 — 804 10/3/ 023 DPR 523A 1 ) equired information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 6 *NRHP Status Code 6Z *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1971 East 4th Street 131. Historic Name: 132. Common Name: 133. Original Use: Office building 134. Present Use: Office building *135. Architectural Style: Modern elements, New Formalism elements *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Page 1 of 65 pages of building permits shows owner/contractor Sunset Builders was issued permit 1957 on 3-19-71. Numerous permits were issued for Interior partitions made by numerous businesses. Page 8/65 shows numerous permits issued in January 1988 to make alterations to medical offices in unit #100 (5480SF, $87,000). Building permit 63224 issued 8-29-90 to reroof, 260 square -feet, $28,000, et cetera. Basically, no significant alterations have been made to the building. *137. Moved? 19INo ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location: *138. Related Features: Three-story office building at 1901 East 4th St.; three-story office building at 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive.; three-story office building at 515 North Cabrillo Park Drive. Asphalt concrete paved surface parking lot. 139a. Architect: Not found b. Builder: Sunset Builders *1310. Significance: Theme: Postwar Commercial Development; Architecture Area: City of Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1971 Property Type: Commercial Applicable Criteria: NA (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This 1971 office building with Modern and New Formalism elements does not meet the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) or the City of Santa Ana criteria. It is not a "historical resource" for purposes of CEQA. See Continuation Sheet Historic Context. Refer to the related report for a detailed historic context (see P11 on page 1). 1311. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *1312. References: City of Santa Ana Var. Building permits provided by the City of Santa Ana in January 2022. 1313. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Eugene Heck, M.A., LSA Associates, Inc., 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200, Riverside, CA 92507 *Date of Evaluation: June 2022 DPR 523B1DWcy RS)COunCII 18 — 805 10/312Md information State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Primary # CONTINUATION SHEET HRI # Trinomial Page 3 of 6 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) 1971 East 4th Street *Recorded by LSA Associates, Inc. *Date: June 2022 X Continuation Update P3a. Description: (continued from page 1) The building reads from the street as two stories; the third floor consists of one small office space over the entry, accessed by stairs. Exterior staircases at the corners of the building have pebblestone treads, and distinctive railings of wood and metal. The staircases have metal stringers. Brick masonry walls are seen by the corner staircases and by the elevator shaft up on the second floor, where they have arched openings with metal gates accessing two small "courtyards." The building is in good condition. Other than the usual modifications made by the tenants to the interior spaces, there were no signs of significant alterations. At a little over 40,000 square feet, it may be classified as a medium-sized office building. Mature pine trees line gently sloping ground toward East 4th Street. This building is the oldest of four built between 1971 and 1978; together, they comprise the small business park known as Town Center Plaza. The building was designed on a grid, and likewise, the business park was laid out on a grid that determined the relationships between the buildings. Central to the modernist design is the "plaza," a large open area, in this case an asphalt concrete paved parking lot. The second oldest building in the park is 1901 East 4th Street (1974). It has a square plan and textured stucco walls, with red Spanish clay roof tiles, cantilevered balconies, and arches. More importantly, its notable design features and motifs tie it to the other buildings, as do minor details. For example, the distinctive wood and metal railing seen at 1971 is again seen at 1901, as are the pebblestone treads, but this time the staircase stringers are wood, not metal. As a modernized version of a Southern California Spanish Colonial Revival regional identity dating back to Arthur Benton and Charles Lummis, these buildings complement each other. The third and fourth buildings to complete the park are more closely related to each other than to the first two, although they all share many features. Ken Himes is known to have designed 525 North Cabrillo Park Drive (1976) (Building Permits; Los Angeles Times 1976a) and likely designed 515 North Cabrillo Park Drive (1978) as well. With these buildings, abstraction has progressed a bit further from regional identity, eschewing balconies, toward more classic, temple -like fagades. The articulated horizontal bands on both 525 and 515 are notable. Each of the four buildings stands as a separate object in space, related by materials, workmanship, and design. They do not crowd one other. The outer lot lines of the parcels form the business park boundaries. P5a. Photo (continued from page 1) South and east elevations, view to the northwest (1/18/22). See Continuation Sheet Courtyard looking north at the third floor office (1/18/22). DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information City Council 18 — 806 10/3/2023 State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Primary # CONTINUATION SHEET HRI # Trinomial Page 4 of 6 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) 1971 East 4th Street *Recorded by LSA Associates, Inc. *Date: June 2022 1310. Significance (continued from page 3) X Continuation Update This building is being evaluated in compliance with CEQA under the California Register and City of Santa Ana criteria for historical significance. To avoid redundancy, the two sets of criteria have been combined where appropriate. • California Register Criterion 1: Is associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. • Santa Ana Criteria 4(a) and 4(d): Buildings, structures, objects, or sites of historical significance which include places: (a) Where important events occurred; and (d) That served as important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity. This building is one of four buildings within the Town Center Plaza business park and the only one that has reached 50 years of age. Town Center Plaza is marginally associated with postwar (1945-1973) growth and suburbanization, since the building at 1971 East 4th Street was constructed at the end of this period. Town Center Plaza is within the 174-acre postwar (and beyond) mixed -use Parkcenter development area and is less than 2 miles east of Santa Ana's original business district. The Parkcenter area was among the last of the orange groves to be developed. Historic aerials show a gradual buildout of this area between Interstate 5, State Route 55, and 17th and 1st Streets during the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Many buildings in the area were constructed less than 50 years ago. Field survey observations outside the project area, however, did not confirm a level of visual cohesion sufficient to identify a potential historic district to which Town Center Plaza contributes. It is possible that additional research and the passage of time may warrant the formal evaluation of Parkcenter, but for now it remains outside the scope of the current study and, in any case, three of the four buildings in the Town Center Plaza are not yet 50 years of age. • California Register Criterion 2: Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. • Santa Ana Criterion 4(b): Buildings, structures, objects, or sites of historical significance which include places: (b) Associated with famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations and businesses. The land is indirectly associated with Hiram Mabury, a 19th century venture capitalist who invested in California real estate and was active in banking. Mabury and his family owned land in Orange County but resided elsewhere. No famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations or businesses are associated with the building at 1971 East 4th Street or the Town Center Plaza business park. • California Register Criterion 3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. • Santa Ana Criteria 1 and 2: (1) Buildings, structures, or objects with distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period that exemplify a particular architectural style or design features; and (2) Works of notable architects, builders, or designers whose style influenced architectural development. The building has distinguishing characteristics of the Modern style including horizontal massing, a flat roof with a low-pitched parapet, interior courtyards and spaces designed to bring the outside in, recessed and protected entries, and glass walls. It also has characteristics of the New Formalism style such as the arches/arcades, monumental entrances, and delicate details like the stair railings. However, it does not exemplify a particular architectural style and is not a true representation of either style. No evidence was found that the building at 1971 East 4th Street is the work of a master architect, builder, or designer. While the building design incorporates interesting architectural details, it does not possess high artistic values because it does not epitomize the design principles of a particular style more fully than other buildings of a similar era and style. As a whole, Town Center Plaza has many of the distinguishing characteristics of the Modern and New Formalism styles and is clearly identifiable as a small business park. The designs, materials, workmanship, and landscaped setting all retain what appears to be a high level of integrity. However, none of these buildings are of exceptional importance and only the earliest of them, 1971 East 4th Street, has achieved 50 years of age. See Continuation Sheet DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information City Council 18 — 807 10/3/2023 State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Primary # CONTINUATION SHEET HRI # Trinomial Page 5 of 6 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) 1971 East 4th Street *Recorded by LSA Associates, Inc. *Date: June 2022 X Continuation Update 1310. Significance (continued from page 4) • California Register Criterion 4: Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. • Santa Ana Criterion 5: Sites of archaeological importance. This 1971 building was built of standard materials using standard building techniques; it is of no archaeological importance and is not likely to yield important information about history or prehistory. The following addresses the remaining Santa Ana criteria for designation: • Santa Ana Criterion 3: Rare buildings, structures, or objects or original designs. The Town Center Plaza building at 1971 East 4th Street incorporates elements of the Modern and New Formalism styles, neither of which is rare in Orange County or the larger Southern California region. Business parks, such as Town Center Plaza, are also common throughout the area. • Santa Ana Criterion 4(c): Buildings, structures, objects, or sites of historical significance which include places which were originally present when the city was founded. The Town Center Plaza building at 1971 East 4th Street is a postwar commercial building; the business park was not present when the city was founded. • Santa Ana Criterion 6: Buildings or structures that were connected with a business or use which was once common, but is now rare. The Town Center Plaza building at 1971 East 4th Street was never connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Most of the tenants provide professional services such as medical, legal, or financial. Town Center Plaza as a whole is a business park, which is a very common property type. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information City Council 18 — 808 10/3/2023 State of California - Resource Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # LOCATION MAP Trinomial Page 6 of 6 *Resource Name or 1971 E. 4th Street *Map Name:USGS 7.5' Quad, Orange, Tustin; Nearmap *Scale: 1:24000 *Date of Map: 1981; 2022 i+ — .�.e...o• Sa - -,mr 1 Ce AVE H.' Hoover1 BM 163 > miss • I a. • 1 # w 41 0 U AVE _4 ' 2 2 Sicrra� W 9 h c AN 60 �1-• ■_ M 4 _ . mum�- T GSM 1 . a 1. •tl .,�, . �n 3 ' ■ 2 167 ' IgIll OM N__C, ater Tank - ■ AVL I IN 0 — r P S lST f�Sca 64 - ALL tit "5■ 55: .'•i r CL --ate - 141 ✓F A APN 400-051-02�11f , , • N s ull, Harty 1971 E. 4th Street — -1 lull •-t•,_• 25 TT-"" 3 sr 13 ,�-1 -, L a 1'*�VON%= _- 14,1 100 1 go t T �i. 'i' ri sr,_ iST ST IIEW / i�yV SL .TLOR4ja[ �- _ --- �y Cfn:•/ ` r :i dav Sch ' J1 +� itr:ter -� ti rJ3 S raj pia B��• nL��i.-_ •r�_�_ �: .>I — -� .•rz �¢� + t + i�!' �5Taa7 ;.I ST r Sr 107 •� �_�•�: _ - Ittk n ET 13 ..DSO, U t=IF� .0 ;�1 _ Q it i1t,'- •1'�Ir:': �� ,`, ,�.. .•�1313 Cj�1 }....tom -- � -�- ,J ! •�� —fitt t G p 91 93 .; •^ Y •�I BM 1 am ��1 a'/�� 1.,:.;j�ic',y� �•; AL SCALE 1:24,000 • 'eit 1 1 /2 0 1 MILE •� hfadiwn'Se 1000 0 11000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET • N • 7 - 1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER TRUE �• ���� 1:\FRC2201\G1S\I (2 ftulBMifation_40005102.mxd (6/15/2022) 18 — 809 104W�/2 DPR 523J (1/95) i�egQd Information LGC Valley, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Dated: December 16, 2021 Project No. 213031-01 Prepared For: FRHRealty LLC. 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92121 28532 Constellation Road • Valencia • CA 91355 • (661) 702-8474. Fax (661) 702-8475 City Council 18 — 810 10/3/2023 LGC Valley, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting December 16, 2021 Project No. 213031-01 Mr. Ed McCoy FRH Realty LLC 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 100 San Diego, California 92121 Subject: Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation Report for a Proposed Residential Development, City of Santa Ana, California In accordance with your request, LGC Valley, Inc. (LGC) has performed a supplemental geotechnical investigation for a proposed residential development located at 1901 and 1971 E. 4tn Street and 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive in the city of Santa Ana, County of Orange, California. The purpose of our supplemental investigation was to provide updated geotechnical recommendations for a proposed residential development, evaluate the conceptual site development plan, geotechnical conditions, review geotechnical and geologic data and maps pertinent to the site, and prepare a report indicating our findings, conclusions, opinions, and recommendations for site development. This report presents the results of our subsurface investigation, and geotechnical analysis of the collected data, grading construction and other relevant geotechnical aspects of the project, and provides our conclusions, opinions including recommendations for stormwater infiltration design and recommendations with respect to site development. Based on the results of our geotechnical evaluation and review, it is our opinion that the proposed site development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations included in this report are incorporated into the project plans and specifications, and followed during site grading and construction. LGC has reviewed the laboratory test data, procedures and results performed by EGLAB, Inc. (EGL), with respect to the subject site and concurs with and accepts responsibility as geotechnical engineer of record for their work (laboratory testing). If you have any questions regarding our report, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, LGC VALLEY, INC Basil Hattar, GE 2734 Principal Engineer BIH/SMB/mw Distribution: (1) Addressee Via Email Susan M. Berger, CEG 2069 Senior Project Geologist rao SUSAN M. BERGER N0.2L9 * CERTIFIED 1� ENGINEERING aIJ GEOLOGIST 28532 Constellation Road • Valencia • CA 91355 • (661) 702-8474. Fax (661) 702-8475 City Council 18 — 811 10/3/2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Site and Project Description........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing.......................................................... 2 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS........................................................................................ 5 2.1 Regional and Local Geology .......... 2.2 Site -Specific Geology ..................... 2.2.1 Quaternary Alluvium (Qal) 2.3 Geologic Structure.................................................................................................. 2.4 Landslides............................................................................................................... 2.5 Groundwater........................................................................................................... 2.6 Surface Water......................................................................................................... 2.7 Seismicity, Faulting and Related Effects............................................................... 2.7.1 Seismicity.................................................................................................. 2.7.2 Seismic Design Criteria............................................................................. 2.7.3 Faulting...................................................................................................... 2.7.4 Shallow Ground Rupture........................................................................... 2.7.5 Liquefaction and Dry Sand Settlement..................................................... 2.7.6 Tsunamis and Seiches................................................................................ 2.8 Settlement .............. 2.9 Slope Stability ....... 2.10 Laboratory Testing 2.11 Percolation Testing 5 5 5 .5 .5 .5 .6 .6 .6 .6 .8 .8 .8 10 10 10 10 11 3.0 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................12 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................14 4.1 Site Earthwork............................................................................................................. 14 4.1.1 Site Preparation...............................................................................................14 4.1.2 Removal and Recompaction............................................................................14 4.1.3 Shrinkage/Bulking..........................................................................................15 4.1.4 Temporary Excavation Stability......................................................................15 4.1.5 Temporary Shoring.........................................................................................16 4.1.6 Fill Backfill and Compaction..........................................................................18 4.1.7 Trench Backfill and Compaction.....................................................................18 P'" ity Counci 18 — 812 32021 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) Section Page 4.2 Foundations.................................................................................................................19 4.2.1 General...........................................................................................................19 4.2.2 Soil Bearing....................................................................................................19 4.2.3 Conventional Foundations..............................................................................19 4.2.4 Post -Tension Foundations...............................................................................20 4.2.5 Mat Foundations.............................................................................................22 4.2.6 Foundation Settlement....................................................................................22 4.3 Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Walls................................................................... 22 4.4 Preliminary Pavement Recommendations................................................................... 23 4.5 Corrosivity to Concrete and Metal............................................................................... 25 4.6 Nonstructural Concrete Flatwork................................................................................. 25 4.7 Swimming Pool..........................................................................................................26 4.8 Control of Surface Water and Drainage Control.......................................................... 27 4.9 Construction Observation and Testing......................................................................... 27 5.0 LIMITATIONS......................................................................................................................28 P'" ityVU Counci b 18 — 813 32021 LIST OF TABLES, APPENDICES AND ILLUSTRATIONS Tables Table 1 — Seismic Design Parameters (Page 7) Table 2 — Summary of infiltration testing (Page 11) Table 3 — Preliminary Geotechnical Parameters for Post -Tension Slab Design (Page 21) Table 4 — Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Walls (Page 23) Table 5 — Preliminary Pavement Design Sections (Page 23) Table 6 — Nonstructural Concrete Flatwork (Page 26) Figures Figure 1 — Site Location Map (Page 4) Figure 2 — Boring Location Map (rear of text) Figure 3 — Retaining Wall Drainage Detail (rear of text) Figure 4 — Geotechnical Guidelines for Swimming Pool Construction (rear of text) Appendices Appendix A — References Appendix B — Boring Logs (LGC and ACG) Appendix C — Laboratory Testing Results (by EGLAB and ACG) Appendix D — Liquefaction and Dry Sand Settlement Analysis Appendix E — General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading P'" ity Counci b 18 — 814 32021 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services The purpose of this supplemental investigation was to identify and evaluate the existing geologic and geotechnical conditions at the site and provide preliminary geotechnical design criteria for the proposed development. Recommendations for grading construction, preliminary foundation design for the proposed structures, stormwater infiltration design and other relevant aspects of the proposed development are included herein to address the identified site geotechnical conditions. This report includes the results of our site exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering evaluation, and provides our conclusions, opinions and recommendations with respect to site development. These items plus other geotechnical conditions are discussed and addressed within this document. Our scope of services for preparation of this document included: Review of available geotechnical reports, geologic maps and other documents relevant to the site (Appendix A). • Perform a site visit to evaluate the existing conditions and mark the geotechnical boring locations. A subsurface investigation including the excavation, sampling, and logging of three small -diameter exploratory borings. The borings are labeled B-LGC-1 through B-LGC-3. Logs of the borings are presented in Appendix B, and their approximate locations are depicted on the Boring Location Map (Figure 2). All the excavations were sampled and logged under the supervision of a licensed geologist from our firm. The borings were excavated to evaluate the general characteristics of the subsurface conditions on the site including classification of site soils, determination of depth to groundwater, and to obtain representative soil samples. Laboratory testing of representative soil samples obtained during our subsurface investigation (Appendix C). • Perform geotechnical analyses and evaluation of the data. • Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, opinions and recommendations with respect to the evaluated geologic and geotechnical conditions at the site. Project i y ouncil 18 — 815 1 3 , 2021 1.2 Site and Project Description The subject site is a rectangular shaped approximately 9-acre site located at the northeast corner of the intersection of E. 4ti' street and Cabrillo Park Drive in the City of Santa Ana, California. The site is bounded by a baseball field to the north, East Cabrillo Park Drive to the west, East 4tn street to the south, and a parking lots and commercial/office buildings to the east (Figure 1, Site Location Map). The entrance into the site is of Cabrillo Park Drive. Based on our review, the site is currently occupied by four commercial structures and asphalt pavement. Two buildings are located at the southeast and southwest corners, one at the northwest corner and one at middle of the east border. It is surrounded by an asphaltic parking lot. It is our understanding that the proposed development will be consisting of 3-story townhomes in the north area (Area 1 - shown in blue) and a five -story wrap with parking structure in the south area (Area 2 - shown in yellow) as shown on the Boring Location Map (Figure 2). Future grading of the site is anticipated to consist of minor design cuts and fills in order to achieve finish grades. Appurtenant structures, carports, parking areas, driveways, storm water filtration systems, landscaping, and associated utilities will also be constructed to support the new development. 1.3 Subsurface Investization and Laboratory Testing Our subsurface investigation was performed on November 22" d, 2021 and consisted of three hollow stem auger borings (B-LGC-1 through B-LGC-3). The geotechnical borings were all excavated to a depth of approximately 51.5 feet below the existing grade. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Boring Location Map (Figure 2). Based on a review of the seismic hazard zone maps prepared by the California Geological Survey (CGS, 2002), the site is not located within a seismic hazard area for potential liquefaction, but is located near a liquefaction hazard area, and has a historic high groundwater elevation of approximately 40 feet below the existing ground surface. Therefore, to evaluate the liquefaction and seismically induced dry sand settlement potentials, LGC advanced all three borings to depths of up to approximately 51.5 feet below the ground surface, and collected samples and SPT blow counts at 2.5-foot intervals. These borings were also used to evaluate the consolidation potential, hydro -collapse potential, and to characterize the near -surface geotechnical characteristics of the site. The borings were sampled and logged from the surface under the supervision of a licensed Engineering Geologist/Geotechnical Engineer from LGC. During the subsurface investigation, representative bulk and relatively undisturbed samples were collected for laboratory testing. Laboratory testing was performed by EGLAB, Inc. (EGL). Laboratory testing was performed on representative soil samples and included moisture and density tests, maximum density and optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, Atterberg Limits, expansion, direct shear, consolidation, collapse, and corrosion testing. A summary of the test procedures and printouts of the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix C. The moisture and density test results were presented on the boring logs included in Appendix B. Project i y ounci1 18 — 816 1 3 , 2021 The previous subsurface investigations performed by Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. (ACG) were performed on July 7, 2021 and consisted of the excavation of eight geotechnical hollow stem auger borings (B-1 through B-8) and three percolation test borings (P-1 through P-3). The geotechnical borings were excavated to a depth of approximately 26 feet while the percolation test borings were excavated to an approximate depth of 5 feet. Approximate locations of the previous borings are included on the Boring Location Map (Figure 2). The logs of the borings are included in Appendix B of this report. During the previous subsurface investigation, representative bulk and relatively undisturbed samples were collected for laboratory testing by ACG. Laboratory testing was performed on representative soil samples and included in -situ moisture and density tests, maximum density and optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, expansion, consolidation, and corrosion testing. The previous laboratory test results are also presented in Appendix C. The moisture and density test results were presented on the boring logs included in Appendix B. Project i y 66n,61 18 — 817 1 3 , 2021 -44 UP7{. Y �5 % f• .. F 55 ■• i. Vxi +~ rid•' _ — WF 77 _ •7 �nn t� t 1 Project Name Santa Ana AL KSRAK IL Project No. 213031-01 Site Location Map Eng. B1H/Mw It un FF / Santa Ana 1 �cSI18 NcItMaQ3 City of Santa Ana, California Date 12/16/21 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 2.1 Regional and Local Geology The subject site is located in Santa Ana within the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province of southern California which is characterized by northwest trending elongated mountain ranges and valleys that are truncated by the Transverse Ranges Geomorphic Province to the north and extend south into Baja California. The site lies within a valley area near the western flank of the Santa Ana Mountains and is underlain by flat -lying basin sediments and Holocene or modern fluvial deposits. The site lies on quaternary younger alluvium which consist of silty sand, sand and clays. 2.2 Site -Specific Geology The subject site is composed of existing fills placed as a part of the previous site development underlain by quaternary younger alluvium. A detailed description is as follows: Z Z I Quaternary Alluvium (Oal) Quaternary alluvium consisted of reddish -brown sandy clays, clayey sands, sandy silts and silty clays and were found to be damp and were soft to stiff and/or loose to dense to the maximum explored depth of approximately 51.5 feet. 2.3 Geologic Structure The site is composed of flat -lying quaternary younger alluvium. The quaternary younger alluvium is interpreted as generally massive with some poorly defined, gradational, lithologic changes between soil types. 2.4 Landslides There are no slopes within the vicinity of the site; therefore, there is no landslide hazard. 2.5 Groundwater No groundwater was encountered in our geotechnical borings to a depth of 51.5 feet, or the previous geotechnical borings by others to depths of 26 feet. Historic high groundwater is considered at a depth greater than 40 feet below the existing site grades per the Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Tustin Quadrangle (SHZR 012, 1998). As such, groundwater is not anticipated to pose problems during site development. Project i y ouncil 18 — 819 1 3 , 2021 2.6 Surface Water Based on our review of local maps, sheet flow is to the southwest. Surface water runoff relative to project design is the purview of the project civil engineer and should be directed away from planned structures. 27 Seismicity. Fauldnz and Related Effects 2.7.1 Seismicity The main seismic parameters to be considered when discussing the potential for earthquake - induced damage are the distances to the causative faults, earthquake magnitudes, and expected ground accelerations. We have performed site -specific analysis based on these seismic parameters for the site and the onsite geologic conditions. The results of our analysis are discussed in terms of the potential seismic events that could be produced by the maximum probable earthquakes. A maximum probable earthquake is the maximum earthquake likely to occur given the known tectonic framework. Elsinore fault is located approximately 14 miles to the northeast, the El Modeno Fault is located approximately 5 miles northeast of the site and the Newport -Inglewood Fault is located approximately 7.1 miles to the southwest. All of these faults have the capability of causing significant shaking at the site. 2.7.2 Seismic Design Criteria The site seismic characteristics were evaluated per the guidelines set forth in Chapter 16, Section 1613 of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) and ASCE 7-16. Representative site coordinates for the subject site of latitude 33.7494' N and longitude-117.83970 W were utilized in our analyses. The maximum considered earthquake (MCE) spectral response accelerations (SMs and SMi) and adjusted design spectral response acceleration parameters (SDs and SDl) for Site Class D are provided in the following Table 1. Project i y 66n,61 18 — 820 1 3 , 2021 Table 1 Seismic Design Parameters Selected Parameters from 2019 CBC, Section 1613 - Earthquake Loads Seismic Design Values Site Class per Chapter 20 of ASCE 7 D* Risk -Targeted Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods (Ss) 1.288g Risk -Targeted Spectral Accelerations for 1-Second Periods (Si) 0.459g Site Coefficient Fa per Table 1613.2.3(1) 1.0 Site Coefficient Fv per Table 1613.2.3(2) 1.841 Site Modified Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods (SMs) for Site Class D [Note: SMs = FaSs] 1.288g Site Modified Spectral Acceleration for 1-Second Periods (SMi) for Site Class D [Note: SMi = FvSI] 0.845 Design Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods (SDs) for Site Class D a [Note: SDS = (/3)SMS] 0.858g Design Spectral Acceleration for 1-Second Periods (SDI) for Site Class D [Note: SDI = C/3)SMI] 0.56333 Seismic Design Category (per Section 1613.2.5) D CRS (Mapped Risk Coefficient at 0.2 sec, Per ASCE 7 Chapter 22 -Figure 22-18A) 0.935 CRI (Mapped Risk Coefficient at 1 sec, Per ASCE 7 Chapter 22 — Figure 22-19A) 0.928 *Structures on Site Class D sites with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2, provided the value of the seismic response coefficient Cs is determined by Eq. (12.8-2) for values of T <_ 1.5Ts and taken as equal to 1.5 times the value computed in accordance with either Eq. (12.8-3) for TL >_ T > 1.5Ts or Eq. (12.8-4) for T > TL. Section 1803.5.12 of the 2019 CBC (per Section 11.8.3 of ASCE 7) states that the maximum considered earthquake ground motions, Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) should be used for the geotechnical evaluations. The PGAM for the site is equal to 0.593g (USGS Seismic Design Maps based on ASCE/SEI 7- 16 and ASCE/SEI 7-16 Table 1.5-2). A deaggregation of the PGA based on a 2,475-year average return period indicates that an earthquake magnitude of 7.71 at a distance of approximately 14.62 km (9.1 mi) from the site would contribute the most to this ground motion (USGS, 2014). Project i y ouncil 18 — 821 1 316, 2021 2.7.3 Faulting Based on our review of geologic and Earthquake Fault Zone maps, the subject site is not located within a Special Studies Zone (Hart and Bryant, 1997) and no active faults are mapped projecting through the subject site. The possibility of damage due to ground rupture from earthquake fault rupture is considered low since active faults are not known to cross the site. Secondary effects of seismic shaking resulting from large earthquakes on the major faults in the southern California region, which may affect the site, include soil liquefaction and dynamic settlement. Other secondary seismic effects include shallow ground rupture, and seiches and tsunamis. In general, these secondary effects of seismic shaking are a possibility throughout the Southern California region and are dependant on the distance between the site and causative fault and the onsite geology. The major active faults that could produce these secondary effects is the Elsinore -Whittier, Newport -Inglewood, and San Andreas faults, among others, surround the site. A discussion of liquefaction and these secondary effects is provided in the following sections. 2.7.4 Shallow Ground Rupture Shallow ground rupture due to active faulting is not likely to occur on site due to the distance from likely seismic events. Therefore, this phenomenon is not considered a significant hazard, although it is a possibility at any site. 2.7.5 Liquefaction and Dry Sand Settlement Liquefaction is a seismic phenomenon in which loose, saturated, granular soils behave similarly to a fluid when subject to high -intensity ground shaking. Liquefaction occurs when three general conditions exist: 1) shallow groundwater; 2) low density non -cohesive (granular) soils; and 3) high -intensity ground motion. Liquefaction is typified by a buildup of pore -water pressure in the affected soil layer to a point where a total loss of shear strength occurs, causing the soil to behave as a liquid. Studies indicate that saturated, loose to medium dense, near surface cohesionless soils exhibit the highest liquefaction potential, while dry, dense, cohesionless soils and cohesive soils exhibit low to negligible liquefaction potential. Based on a review of seismic hazard zone map for the Tustin Quadrangle and Orange Quadrangle prepared by the California Geological Survey (CGS, 2002), the site is not located within a State of California Seismic Hazard Zone mapped liquefaction hazard area. Effects of liquefaction on level ground include potential seismic settlement, sand boils, ground oscillation, and bearing capacity failures below structures. Historic high groundwater elevation is greater than 40 feet below the ground surface near the location of the subject site (CGS, 2002). No groundwater was encountered in the borings to a depth of 51.5 feet. A conservative groundwater depth of 40 feet was utilized in the liquefaction analysis. Project i y ouncil 18 — 822 1 3 , 2021 Our evaluation utilized the information collected from the excavations and laboratory test results, along with utilizing the more recent studies as indicated in SP 117A by Bray and Sancio, 2006 as a screening tool to determine if the encountered fine grained soils (clays) are susceptible to liquefaction and analyzed as such. Our evaluation included performing grain size distribution, Atterberg limit, and moisture content testing on representative fine-grained layers (i.e. clayey/silty Sands) encountered within the geotechnical borings excavated on -site. The laboratory test results indicated that the encountered fine-grained layers have a plasticity index of 5, 7, 10 and 12, and moisture contents less than 85 percent of the liquid limit and is considered as being susceptible to liquefaction. The liquefaction analysis was performed using the LiquefyPro program with a user provided factor of safety of 1.0. The liquefaction analysis was performed considering a minimum 5- foot remedial removal and recompaction and the existing condition below with the highest historic groundwater elevation at a depth of 40 feet below the ground surface. The liquefaction analysis was performed using the following input data: • Groundwater at a depth of 40 feet below the ground surface during seismic event, and boring groundwater at elevations ranging 51.5 feet. • A Peak Horizontal Ground Acceleration (PGAM) of 0.593g for a Design Earthquake Magnitude of 7.71. • Fines content as determined from laboratory testing during this investigation. • The hammer used for determining blow -counts for both the ring and SPT sampling was an auto -trip hammer with a 140 lb weight and a 30-inch drop. Therefore, based on the type of hammer used, an energy correction factor (CE) of 1.3 is considered acceptable for use in the analysis. Based on our site evaluation, liquefaction analysis, and our professional opinion, there is a potential for specific layers to liquefy between a depth of 44 to 51.5 feet below the existing site grades. During a strong seismic event, seismically induced settlement can occur within loose to moderately dense, dry or saturated granular soil. Settlement caused by ground shaking is often non -uniformly distributed, which can result in differential settlement. Based on blow counts and in -situ densities, the native alluvial soils between a depth of 5 to 40 feet below the existing ground surface are susceptible to seismically induced dry sand settlements and were evaluated in our analysis. Based on the results of the liquefaction/seismically induced settlement analysis, we estimated the amount of total liquefaction -induced and dry sand settlement possible for the design conditions is approximately 3-inches or less, and a differential settlement of approximately 1.5-inches. We estimated these settlements based on the procedures proposed by Tokimatsu and Seed (1987). The graphical output of our liquefaction analysis which also shows the graphical output of seismically induced saturated and dry sand settlement is included in Appendix D. Project i y ouncil 18 — 823 1 3 , 2021 2.7.6 Tsunamis and Seiches Based on the elevation of the proposed development at the site with respect to sea level and its distance from large open bodies of water, the potential of seiche and/or tsunami is considered to be nil. 2.8 Settlement Several components of settlement were considered in evaluating the total settlement at the site including seismic settlement of the underlying alluvium, hydro -collapse settlement of alluvium, and settlement of foundations due to foundation loads. Hydro -collapse potential of the underlying fill and alluvium was evaluated based upon available geotechnical data including in -situ densities and hydro -collapse test results. Hydro -collapse potential of the underlying materials is considered negligible (i.e. less than 0.5%). Hence, the hydro - consolidation settlement potential of the underlying alluvium is considered negligible. As previously discussed, seismic settlement of the alluvium at the site was evaluated and is expected to be on the order of approximately 3 inches, or less. Seismic settlement of engineered compacted fill is assumed to be negligible. Therefore, differential seismic induced settlements of up to 1.5 inches should be considered in the foundation design. This seismic settlement should be added to other settlement components due to static loads. Structures planned at the site are expected to be of conventional wood -frame construction or concrete for the parking structure. Foundation settlements due to static column loads with the recommended remedial removals provided herein are expected to be minor, on the order of 1-inch, or less. 2.9 Slope Stability No significant permanent slopes currently exist onsite or are planned for the subject site, therefore slope stability is not considered an issue with respect to site development. 2.10 Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing of the onsite soils was performed on representative samples obtained from the borings and included moisture and density tests, maximum density and optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, Atterberg Limits, expansion, direct shear, consolidation, collapse, and corrosion testing. Laboratory testing was performed by EGLAB, Inc. (EGL). LGC has reviewed the laboratory test data, procedures and results performed by EGL with respect to the subject site and concurs with and accepts responsibility as geotechnical engineer of record for their work (laboratory testing). A discussion of the tests performed, and printout of the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix C. The moisture and density test results are presented on the boring logs in Appendix B. Preliminary expansion potential testing of the upper site soils from sample collected as a part of this study indicated expansion index of 101, "High" (per ASTM D4829). Sulfate testing indicated soluble sulfate content of 0.009 percent ("Negligible" per ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.2.1). Project i y 66n,61 18 — 824 1 3 , 2021 A corrosion suite (pH, resistivity, and chloride content) was also performed on a sample obtained from the geotechnical boring to estimate the corrosion potential of onsite soils. The resistivity tests resulted in a minimum resistivity of 2,100 ohm -centimeters, a pH of 7.76, and chloride content of 130 ppm. Test results are provided in Appendix C. These results/assumptions should be confirmed at the completion of site grading. Results of the previous laboratory testing (by ACG) performed during the previous site investigation indicated expansion index ranging from 69 to 94 (Medium to High Expansion potentials), soluble sulfate content of non -detectible to 0.017%, Minimum Resistivities ranging from 680 to 1,700 ohm - cm, Chloride content of 15 to 65 ppm, and pH ranging from 7.94 to 8.04. Previous testing also included maximum density and optimum moisture tests, consolidation, and grain size distribution. The previous test results are included in Appendix C of this report. 2.11 Percolation Testing Preliminary percolation testing was performed as a part of the previous site investigations (by ACG), a discussion and the results of the preliminary testing (by ACG, 2021) is provided herein. it is our understanding that the project may utilize infiltration systems for storm water disposal. Details of the system are not known at this time. Shallow infiltration testing was performed in three (3) five -foot -deep borings (P-1 through P-3) located across the site. The location of the percolation tests is shown on the attached Figure 2. The following discussion and information are from the referenced report. The testing was performed in general accordance with the County of Orange Technical Guidance Document. The three test wells were presoaked at least 24 hours prior to testing. During testing, the water level readings were recorded every 30 minutes until the readings stabilized. The data was then adjusted to provide an infiltration rate utilizing the Porchet Method. The resulting infiltration rates are presented in Table 2. The results do not include a factor of safety. Table 2 Summary of Infiltration Testinz (No Factor of Safety) Test Designation P-1 P-2 P-3 Approximate Depth of Test 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft Time Interval 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes Radius of Test Hole 4 inches 4 inches 4 inches Tested Infiltration Rate 4.1 in/hr 5.0 in/hr 6.2 in/hr Project i y 6unci1 18 — 825 1 316, 2021 3.0 CONCL USIONS Based on the results of our geotechnical evaluation and review, it is our opinion that the proposed site development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the following recommendations included in this report are incorporated into the project plans and specifications, and followed during site grading and construction. Our geotechnical conclusions are as follows: • The site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Zone. • No groundwater was encountered in our geotechnical borings across the site. We do not anticipate that the site excavation will encounter groundwater. Design groundwater should be considered at a depth of below 40 feet below the existing grades. • The site is not located within an area deemed to have a potential for liquefaction (CGS, 2002). Based on our site assessment, liquefaction potential is low and subsequent seismically induced settlement was found to be on the order of 3 inches or less. • Total static (1 inch or less) and seismically induced settlements (3 inches or less) of up to 4 inches with differential settlements of up to 2 inches in 30 feet should be considered in the foundation design. • Based on the subsurface exploration and our review, the site is underlain by alluvium. The existing fills and alluvial soils are considered potentially compressible/collapsible in the upper approximately 5 to 10 feet. • The anticipated site excavation and the proposed construction will not have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties. • Active or potentially active faults are not known to exist on the site. • Laboratory test results of the onsite soils indicate a medium to high expansion potential. For preliminary design purposes a high expansion potential should be considered in foundation design. • Laboratory test results of the onsite soils indicate negligible soluble sulfate contents and should be considered corrosive to metals. • Laboratory test results of the onsite soils indicate a negligible potential of hydro -collapse underlying the recommended remedial removals. • The onsite soils below recommended remedial grading/excavation depths have a low potential for static settlement (i.e., slightly compressible). • From a geotechnical perspective, the existing onsite soils are suitable for use as fill, provided they are relatively free from rocks (larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension), construction debris, and organic material. Percolation testing conclusions are as follows: • From a geotechnical perspective, allowing storm water to infiltrate the onsite soil in concentrated areas increases the potential for settlement, liquefaction, and water -related damage to structures/improvements, such as wet or pumping subgrade, and should be avoided where possible. If infiltration systems are required on this site, care should be taken in designing systems that control the storm water as much as possible. • Preliminary infiltration testing was conducted at the site as part of the previous site investigation by ACG. Based on the previous testing and results by ACG, site infiltration rates for P-1 through P-3 were calculated to be 4.1-inches per hour, 5.0-inches per hour and 6.2-inches per hour, respectively. The results do not include a factor of safety. Test P-1 through P-3 were conducted in silty sand lenses of the younger fan deposits at approximately 5-feet below the ground surface. Project i y ouncil 18 — 826 1 3 , 2021 • No groundwater was encountered during our investigation to a depth of approximately 51 feet below the ground surface. The historic high ground water is greater than 40 feet below the ground surface (CDMG, 1998). Nearby groundwater wells indicate groundwater is deeper than 100-feet. Based on the infiltration rates of the underlying soil, infiltration -type WQMP's are likely feasible for project within the depths tested. The Project Geotechnical Consultant should review the final WQMP design prior to construction. • Any proposed infiltration well should be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. • Proposed stormwater infiltration is not anticipated to adversely impact soil structure interaction, provided that the percolation area is setback a minimum of 10 feet from any building or wall foundations. • The infiltration facility shall be designed to overflow to the street in the event that the drainage capacity is exceeded or in case of future failure to adequately infiltrate • The proper use and maintenance of the drainage systems are critical to maintain the useful design life per the guidelines set forth by the drain manufacturer. • The subject site was reviewed from a liquefaction perspective that used groundwater at the historic high of 40 feet below the ground surface. The proposed structures will be designed with this in mind. The proposed stormwater infiltration will not have an adverse effect to the proposed site development from a liquefaction standpoint. Project i y ouncil 18 — 827 1 3 , 2021 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Site Earthwork We anticipate that earthwork at the site will consist of site preparation, demolition of existing buildings, removal or abandonment of existing utilities crossing the site, and the removal of existing pavement areas, followed by remedial removals and site grading followed by construction of slab -on -grade type foundations for the proposed residential structures and parking structure, installation of utilities, subsequently followed by paving/pouring of driveways and streets. We recommend that earthwork onsite be performed in accordance with the recommendations herein, the City of Santa Ana, and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading included in Appendix E. In case of conflict, the recommendations in the following sections shall supersede those included as part of Appendix E. 4.1.1 Site Preparation Prior to grading of areas to receive structural fill or engineered structures, all ground surfaces should be cleared of obstructions, any existing debris and stripped of vegetation. Heavy vegetation and debris should be removed and properly disposed of offsite. All debris from any demolition activities at the site should also be removed and disposed off -site. Holes or depressions resulting from the removal of buried obstructions should be replaced with compacted fill. Following remedial removals, areas to receive fill should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to a near -optimum moisture condition, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on American Standard of Testing and Materials [ASTM] Test Method D1557). 4.1.2 Removal and Recompaction As discussed in Section 2.2, the upper portion of the site is underlain by potentially compressible/collapsible or unsuitable soils (i.e. existing fills and younger alluvium), which may settle under the addition of water, under the surcharge of fill and/or foundation loads. Compressible materials not removed by the planned grading should be excavated to competent material and replaced with compacted fill soils. We anticipate removals across the apartment and townhome sites to be approximately 5 feet in depth below existing grade or a minimum of 3-feet below proposed residential buildings footing bottom elevations, and up to 10 feet below existing grade, for the parking structure area, or a minimum of 3-feet below the parking structure foundations, whichever is deeper, to remove unsuitable fills and alluvium; however, other localized, deeper removals should be anticipated where deemed necessary by the geotechnical consultant based on observations during grading. Removal bottoms should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to at least optimum -moisture content, and recompacted. Compacted fills placed underlying the townhomes/apartment structures and parking structure should be compacted to minimum relative compactions of 90 and 95 percent, respectively. The fill prism beneath the building footings should extend downward at a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope from the outside edge of the footing bottoms. The removals should extend a minimum of 5 feet beyond the building perimeters. In general, the intent of the remedial removals is to remove all undocumented fills, and unsuitable alluvium. Project i y ouncil 18 — 828 1 3 , 2021 Compressible materials, within areas planned to support pavement or other appurtenant structures outside of the proposed building footprints, should be excavated to competent material and replaced with compacted fill soils. We anticipate these removals on the site to be on the order of approximately 3 feet below existing grade or 2-foot below any footings; however, localized, deeper removals should be anticipated where deemed necessary by the geotechnical consultant based on observations during grading. Removal bottoms should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to at least optimum -moisture content, and recompacted. Based on our site investigation groundwater was not encountered to the maximum explored depth of 51.0 feet below the existing site grades and groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during site excavation. From a geotechnical perspective, material that is removed may be placed as fill provided the material is relatively free from rocks (greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension), organic material and construction debris, is moisture -conditioned or dried (as needed) to obtain above - optimum moisture content, and then recompacted prior to additional fill placement or construction. 4.1.3 Shrinkaze/Bulkinm Based on the site soils, bulking is not anticipated at the site. The preliminary estimated shrinkage factors of approximately 10 percent for the alluvium may be used for consideration of earthwork calculations. These are preliminary rough estimates which will vary with depth of removal, stripping losses, field conditions at the time of grading, etc. In addition, handling losses are not included in the estimates. 4.1.4 Temporary Excavation Stability Due to the recommended depth of remedial removals below existing grades (approximately 5 to 10 feet), the temporary stability of the excavations along the perimeter of the site needs to be considered. In general, all excavations should be performed in accordance with project plans, specifications, and all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. Excavations should be laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements before personnel or equipment are allowed to enter. Soil conditions should be mapped and frequently checked by a representative of LGC to verify conditions are as anticipated. The contractor shall be responsible for providing the "competent person" required by OSHA standards to evaluate soil conditions. Close coordination with the geotechnical engineer should be maintained to facilitate construction while providing safe excavations. Excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Temporary excavations maybe cut vertically up to five feet. Excavations over five feet should be slot -cut, shored, or cut no steeper than 1H: 1V (horizontal, H: vertical, V) slope gradient. Surface water should be diverted away from the exposed cut, and not be allowed to pond on top of the excavations. Temporary cuts should not be left open for an extended period of time. Planned temporary conditions should be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant of record in order to reduce the potential for sidewall failure. The geotechnical consultant may provide recommendations for controlling the length of sidewall exposed. Project i y 66n,61 18 — 829 1 3 , 2021 Where sufficient space is not available for sloped cuts directly adjacent to existing structures or improvements the cut shall be performed by the A-B-C slot method as outlined below. 1. The banks of the excavation shall be made at 1H:1V or a combination of vertical cut and a 1H :1V. 2. Vertical cuts, not exceeding 8 feet in width are made in the locations of the first slot «A„ 3. Back -fill and compact the first slot. 4. The second adjacent slot, `B" is excavated. 5. Back -fill and compact the second slot. 6. Then the third slot "C" is excavated. 7. Back -fill and compact the third slot. 8. Repeat the above steps until all the required excavations are performed adjacent to the existing improvements. 4.1.5 Temporary Shoring (If Necessary) The following preliminary geotechnical parameters may be utilized by the shoring consultant for design of the temporary shoring system. Temporary shoring is generally considered to have a service life of two years or less. The geotechnical conditions outside of the perimeter of the proposed structure have not been investigated as part of this report. The recommendations provided herein with regard to shoring of the proposed excavation are based on assumed conditions, extrapolated from the data gathered from our site investigations. The shoring designer should independently evaluate the parameters provided, and conduct an additional investigation if they consider necessary. Prior to construction, the contractor should verify underground clearance of any existing utility lines or structures that must be removed or protected in place during construction, or may conflict with any proposed shoring system. Any tieback anchors and/or soil nails that extend beyond the site property limits will require permission from the adjacent property owner. Special attention will be required to protect existing settlement sensitive improvement in close proximity to the proposed excavation, such as any adjacent structures or streets located along the boundary of the site. Typical cantilever temporary shoring, where deflection of the shoring will not impact the performance of adjacent structures or streets, may be designed using the active equivalent fluid pressures of 40 pounds per square foot (psf) per foot of depth (or pcf). Braced (i.e. internal bracing -rakers) or tied -back shoring is recommended in areas where the shoring will be located close to existing structures or streets in order to limit shoring defections or required due to the proposed depth of excavation. Braced or tied -back shoring with a level backfill may be designed using an active trapezoidal soil pressure of 24H in pounds per square foot (psf), where H is equal to the depth in feet of the excavation being shored (shape of the trapezoid should be 0.2H, 0.6H, 0.2H). Any building, equipment, or traffic loads located within a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) projection from the base of the shoring should be added to the applicable lateral earth pressure. A minimum additional uniform lateral pressure of 100 psf for the upper 10 feet should be added to the appropriate lateral earth pressures to account for typical vehicle traffic loading. The proposed shoring should be designed for a maximum shoring deflection of up to 1-inch adjacent to the street (non -surcharged condition) and up to a maximum of 0.5-inches adjacent to existing buildings (surcharged condition). Project i y 66n,61 18 — 830 1 3 , 2021 In addition, the above noted lateral earth pressures for temporary shoring does not include hydrostatic pressures since the current groundwater level was encountered below the anticipated depth of the subterranean structure. Consideration should be given to increasing the provided lateral earth pressures and/or design factors of safety in order to further limit shoring deflections and subsequent potential impacts on adjacent structures and improvements, as necessary. If temporary gravity grouted tie -backs are used anchors may be designed using a preliminary bond stress of 400 pounds per square foot (psf), and if pressure/post-grouted tieback anchors are used, anchors may be designed using a preliminary bond stress of up to 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf). However, the tieback designer should make an independent evaluation in order to verify the preliminary bond stress is adequate for site conditions. Tieback bond stress should be verified by field testing. Tieback anchors should minimally be designed, constructed, and tested in accordance with the requirements of the Post -Tensioning Institute (PTI). For design purposes, tieback should obtain their load -carrying capacity from the soil behind a plane taken to be 3 horizontal feet from the bottom of the shoring facing and inclined at an angle of 60 degrees measured from the horizontal extending to the top of the excavation. Passive resistance of soldier piles may be assumed to be an equivalent fluid pressure of 350 pcf to a maximum value of 3,500 psf. The passive earth pressure may be increased by 100 percent for isolated piles. Piles with spacing greater than 3 times of pile diameter can be considered as isolated piles. In order to develop the full lateral resistance, firm contact between the soldier pile and undisturbed soils must be assured. For vertical shoring capacity, an allowable skin friction of 500 psf may be used for the portion of pier below the proposed development excavation. End bearing should be neglected. Drilling of shafts for solider piles may require casing or drilling mud to prevent caving. The components of the shoring system should be designed by a California licensed structural and/or civil engineer specializing in the design of shoring systems. Field pullout testing should be performed during construction to verify the estimated pullout resistance used in the design and/or post grout tubes should be used to ensure adequate design capacities are obtained. Ultimately, it is the specialty contractor's responsibility to obtain the required pullout capacity, which may require design and/or field modifications. LGC should review the shoring plans prior to construction to verify that geotechnical recommendations are properly implemented into the project plans It is highly recommended that a program of documentation and monitoring be devised and put into practice before the onset of any groundwork. The contractor should establish survey points on the shoring, adjacent streets, and neighboring buildings within 100 feet of the excavation perimeter prior to any excavation. These survey points should be used to monitor the movement of the shoring and existing improvements during construction excavation. The monitoring program should include, but not necessarily be limited to detailed documentation of the existing improvements, buildings and utilities around the excavation, with particular attention to any distress that is already present prior to the start of work. Project i y ouncil 18 — 831 1 3 , 2021 A licensed surveyor should be retained to establish monuments on the shoring and the surrounding ground prior to excavation. Such monuments should be monitored for horizontal and vertical movement during construction. Results of the monitoring program should be provided immediately to the project structural (shoring) engineer and LGC for review and evaluation. 4.1.6 Fill Placement and Compaction From a geotechnical perspective, the onsite soils are suitable for use as compacted fill, provided they are screened of rocks greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension, organic material, and construction debris. Areas prepared to receive structural fill and/or other surface improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches, brought to at least optimum -moisture content, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557). The compacted fills underlying the proposed parking structure should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. The optimum lift thickness to produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used. In general, fill should be placed in uniform lifts generally not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. Placement and compaction of fill should be performed in accordance with local grading ordinances under the observation and testing of the geotechnical consultant. In general, oversized material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. Rebar should be removed from concrete rubble prior to burial or mixing with fill. Oversize material may be incorporated into design fills in accordance with our standard grading details. Pulverized asphalt concrete paving or crushed Portland cement concrete from demolition of the existing improvements may be mixed in the fills in a 80/20 blend (with the 20 percent being crushed asphalt or concrete) with no material over 6-inches in maximum dimension; or be placed in a rock disposal. If possible, import soils should contain no materials over 6 inches in maximum dimension and have a low expansion potential. 4.1.7 Trench Backrill and Compaction The onsite soils may generally be suitable as trench backfill provided, they are screened of rocks and other material over 6 inches in diameter and organic matter. Trench backfill should be compacted in uniform lifts (generally not exceeding 8 inches in compacted thickness) by mechanical means to at least 90 percent relative compaction (per ASTM Test Method D 1557). If trenches are shallow and the use of conventional equipment may result in damage to the utilities; clean sand, having sand equivalent (SE) of 30 or greater, should be used to bed and shade the utilities. Sand backfill should be densified. The densification may be accomplished by jetting or flooding and then tamping to ensure adequate compaction. A representative from LGC should observe, probe, and test the backfill to verify compliance with the project specifications. Project i y 66n,61 18 — 832 1 3 , 2021 4.2 Foundations 4.2.1 General Preliminary recommendations for foundation design and foundation construction are presented herein. When the structural loads for the proposed structures are known they should be provided to our office to verify the recommendations presented herein. The following foundation recommendations are provided for support of anticipated at grade residential structures, and parking structure: conventional, post -tension, and Mat slab foundations, for use as needed. For preliminary design purposes a high expansion potential should be considered for design. The as -graded soil conditions should be verified as the completion of grading. The information and recommendations presented in this section are not meant to supersede design by the project structural engineer or civil engineer specializing in the structural design nor impede those recommendations by a corrosion consultant. Should conflict arise, modifications to the foundation design provided herein can be provided. 4.2.2 Soil Bearing Proposed minor site at -grade improvements may be supported on spread footings provided that the earthwork recommendations outlined in this report are properly implemented. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf may be used for the design of footings placed in compacted fill having a minimum width of 12 inches and minimum embedment of 24 inches below lowest adjacent ground surface. This value may be increased by 300 psf for each additional foot of embedment and 100 psf for each additional foot of foundation width to a maximum value of 3,000 psf. These allowable bearing pressures are applicable for level (ground slope equal to or flatter than 5H:IV) conditions only. Bearing values indicated above are for total dead loads and frequently applied live loads. The above vertical bearing may be increased by one-third for short durations of loading which will include the effect of wind or seismic forces. 4.2.3 Conventional Foundations Footings for proposed structures should have minimum depths (below lowest adjacent finish grade) of 24 inches for exterior footings and 18 inches for interior footings, for one, two, and three/four story structures for the anticipated high expansion potential (91-130 Expansion Index). Shallow foundations may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 IMF (gross), for the design of footings placed in compacted fill having a minimum width of 12 inches and minimum embedment of 24 inches below lowest adjacent ground surface. Shallow foundations for continuous footings should be a minimum of 12, 15, and 18 inches wide for one, two, and three/four story structures, respectively, and spread footings 24 inches wide founded into compacted fill or competent native soils. A factor of safety greater than 3 was used in evaluating the above bearing capacity values. This value may be increased by Project i y 66n,61 18 — 833 1 3 , 2021 300 psf for each additional foot of embedment and 100 psf for each additional foot of foundation width to a maximum value of 4,000 psf. An effective plasticity index of 25, for the on -site soils, may be used in the foundation design. Lateral forces on footings may be resisted by passive earth resistance and friction at the bottom of the footing. Foundations may be designed for a coefficient of friction of 0.35, and a passive earth pressure of 250 lb/ft2/ft. The passive earth pressure incorporates a factor of safety of about 1.5. All footing excavations should be cut square and level and should be free of sloughed materials and trash. Subgrade soils should be pre -moistened for the assumed low expansion potential (to be confirmed at the end of grading). The subgrade should be moisture -conditioned and proof -rolled just prior to construction to provide a firm, relatively unyielding surface, especially if the surface has been loosened by the passage of construction traffic. Subgrade soils should be pre -saturated to 1.3 times optimum moisture content to a depth of 24 inches for a high expansion potential. The minimum thickness of the floor slabs should be at least 5 inches, and joints should be provided per usual practice. The underslab moisture retarder (i.e. an equivalent capillary break method) should consist of a 15-mil thick polyolefin (or equivalent) in conformance with ASTM E 1745 Class A material underlain by a minimum 1-inch of sand, as needed. The sand layer requirements above the vapor barrier are the purview of the foundation engineer/structural engineer and should be provided in accordance with ACI Publication 302 "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction". These recommendations must be confirmed (and/or altered) by the foundation engineer, based upon the performance expectations of the foundation. Ultimately, the design of the moisture retarder system and recommendations for concrete placement and curing are the purview of the foundation engineer, in consideration of the project requirements provided by the architect and developer. 4.Z4 Post -Tension Foundations Based on the site geotechnical conditions and provided the remedial recommendations provided herein are implemented, the site may be considered suitable for the support of the anticipated structures using a post -tensioned slab -on -grade foundation system for high expansion potential (91 to 130 Expansion Index). The following section summaries our recommendations for the foundation system. The post -tension parameters provided in Table 3 are based on the expansion potential only, and do not incorporate any increase for seismically induced settlements. Project i y 66n,61 18 — 834 1 3 , 2021 TABLE 3 Preliminary Geotechnical Parameters for Post -Tensioned Foundation Design Parameter Value Expansion Classification (Assumed to be confirmed at High Expansion the completion of grading): Thornthwaite Moisture Index From Figure 3.3 : -20 Constant Soil Suction From Figure 3.4 : PF 3.6 Center Lift Edge moisture variation distance (from Figure 3.6), em: Medium Center lift, yr,: 9.0 feet 0.66 inches Edge Lift Edge moisture variation distance (from Figure 3.6), em: Medium Edge lift, ym: 5.0 feet 1.6 inches Soluble Sulfate Content for Design of Concrete Mix in Assume Negligible Exposure Contact with Site Soils in Accordance with American (to be confirmed at the completion of Concrete Institute standard 318, Section 4.3: grading) Corrosivity of Earth Materials to Ferrous Metals: Corrosive Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k (assuming 85 pci (high) resaturation as indicated below): Additional Recommendations: 1. Presaturate slab subgrade to at least optimum -moisture content or to 1.3 times optimum moisture, to minimum depths of 24 inches below ground surface, respectively for high expansion potentials. 2. Install a 15-mil moisture/vapor barrier (or equivalent) moisture/vapor barrier in direct contact with the concrete (unless superseded by the Structural/Post-tension engineer*) with 1 to 2 inches of sand below the moisture/vapor barrier. 3. Minimum perimeter foundation embedment below finish grade for moisture cut off should be 24 inches for high expansion potentials. 4. Minimum slab thickness should be 5 inches. * The above sand and Visqueen recommendations are traditionally included with geotechnical foundation recommendations although they are generally not a major factor influencing the geotechnical performance of the foundation. The sand and Visqueen requirements are the purview of the foundation engineer/corrosion engineer (in accordance with ACI Publication 302 "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction") and the homebuilder to ensure that the concrete cures more evenly than it would otherwise, is protected from corrosive environments, and moisture penetration of through the floor is acceptable to future homeowners. Therefore, the above recommendations may be superseded by the requirements of the previously mentioned parties. Project i y 6unci1 18 — 835 1 3 , 2021 4.2.5 Mat Foundation A mat foundation can be used for support of proposed residential buildings. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,250 psf may be used for the design of the mat at the surface under the slab area. The allowable bearing value is for total dead loads and frequently applied live loads and may be increased by one-third for short durations of loading which will include the effect of wind or seismic forces. A coefficient of vertical subgrade reaction, k, of 85 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used to evaluate the pressure distribution beneath the mat foundation. The magnitude of total and differential settlements of the mat foundation will be a function of the structural design and stiffness of the mat. Based on assumed structural loads, we estimate that total static settlement will be on the order of an inch at the center of the mat foundation. Post construction differential settlement can be taken as one-half of the maximum estimated settlement Resistance to lateral loads can be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. Foundations may be designed for a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Coordination with the structural engineer will be required in order to ensure structural loads are adequately distributed throughout the mat foundation to avoid localized stress concentrations resulting in potential settlement. The foundation plan should be reviewed by LGC to confirm preliminary estimated total and differential static settlements. 4.2.6 Foundation Settlement Based on our current understanding of the project, the results of our site investigation and the recommended remedial grading with shallow foundations embedded into compacted fills or competent native soils, we estimate the post -construction static settlement of the site to be less than 1 inch with a differential settlement of approximately of 0.5-inches in 30 feet. Post - construction settlements should also include the estimated differential seismically induced settlements of 1.5-inches in 30 feet. For a total static and seismically induced differential settlement of up 2-inches in 30 feet. 4.3 Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaininiz Walls The following lateral earth pressures may be used for the design of any future site retaining walls, if any. Due to the variable nature of onsite soils, we recommend site retaining walls be backfilled with select soils or clean sand having a sand equivalence of greater than 30. Select soils should consist of clean, granular soils (less than 15 percent passing the No. 200 sieve) of very low expansion potential (expansion index 20 or less based on U.B.C. 18-2). The recommended lateral pressures for clean sand or approved select soils for level or sloping backfill are presented in Table 4. Project i y ouncil 18 — 836 1 3 , 2021 TABLE 4 Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaininz Walls Conditions Equivalent Fluid Weight (pcf) Level Backfill 2:1 Backfill Sloping Upwards Approved Select Material Approved Select Material Active 35 50 At Rest 55 80 Passive 250 — For design purposes, the recommended equivalent fluid pressure for each case for walls founded above the static ground water and backfilled with approved select soils is provided in Table 4. The equivalent fluid pressure values assume free -draining conditions. If conditions other than those assumed above are anticipated, the equivalent fluid pressure values should be provided on an individual -case basis by the geotechnical engineer. Surcharge loading effects from the adjacent structures should be evaluated by the geotechnical and structural engineers. Retaining wall structures should be provided with appropriate drainage and appropriately waterproofed. The outlet pipe should be sloped to drain to a suitable outlet. Typical wall drainage design is illustrated on Figure 3. It should be noted that the recommended subdrain does not provide protection against seepage through the face of the wall and/or efflorescence. Efflorescence is generally a white crystalline powder (discoloration) that results when water, which contains soluble salts, migrates over a period of time through the face of a retaining wall and evaporates. If such seepage or efflorescence is undesirable, retaining walls should be waterproofed to reduce this potential. For sliding resistance, a friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used at the concrete and soil interface. Wall footings should be designed in accordance with structural considerations. Refer to Sections 4.2.2 for allowable soil bearing. 4.4 Preliminary Pavement Recommendations Asphaltic Concrete Based on a preliminary R-value of 5, we recommend the following preliminary minimum street sections for Traffic Indices of 5, 6, and 7 (Table 5). These recommendations should be confirmed with R-value testing of representative near -surface soils at the completion of grading. Final street sections should be confirmed by the project civil engineer based upon the projected Traffic Index. In addition, additional sections can be provided based on other traffic indices. Table 5 Preliminary Pavement Design Sections Assumed Traffic Index 5 6 7 R-Value Subgrade 5 5 5 AC Thickness 3.5 inches 4.0 inches 5 inches Base Thickness 9.0 inches 12.0 inches 14.0 inches Project i y ouncil 18 — 837 1 316, 2021 The aggregate base material should conform to the specifications for Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction —SSPWC Section 200-2). The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture -conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP) may be designed using a minimum of 8-inches of Portland cement concrete over 6-inches of compacted aggregate base. The modulus of rupture of the concrete should be a minimum of 500 pounds per square inch (psi) at 28 days. Contraction joints should be placed at maximum 15-foot spacing. Where the outer edge of a concrete pavement connects to an asphalt pavement, the concrete slab should be thickened by 50 percent at a taper not to exceed a slope of 1 in 10. This section is only applicable for passenger car driveway areas and should be thickened if heavy truck loading is anticipated. In addition, additional sections can be provided based on other desired anticipated traffic loadings. The aggregate base material should conform to the specifications for Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction —SSPWC Section 200-2). The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture -conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Vehicular Concrete Pavers Vehicular pavers are typically 3-1/8 inches in thickness and are underlain by 1-inch of sand. Based on ASCE 58-10 for interlocking pavers, considering a Traffic Index (TI) of 6 and an R-value of 5 for the subgrade soils, we recommend the following base section underlying the proposed pavers. The proposed pavers and sand should be underlain by a minimum of 18-inches of aggregate base. As an alternative interlocking pavers and sand bedding can also be placed directly on the design asphaltic concrete base course over aggregate base, considering a TI of 6, or can be placed on a minimum of 5- inches of concrete over 6 inches of aggregate base. The design pavement sections provided herein are considered suitable to support the imposed loads from a fire apparatus. The aggregate base material should conform to the specifications for Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction —SSPWC Section 200-2). The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent per ASTM- D1557. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture -conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Project i y 66n,61 18 — 838 1 3 , 2021 Fire lane TurfBlock Turf block should be per manufactures specifications. For preliminary recommendations turf block should have a minimum thickness of 4 inches and a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 3,000 psi. The turf block pavement should be underlain by a minimum of 18-inches of aggregate base. The aggregate base material should conform to the specifications for Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction —SSPWC Section 200-2). The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent per ASTM- D1557. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture -conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. 4.5 Corrosivity to Concrete and Metal The National Association of Corrosion Engineers (MACE) defines corrosion as "a deterioration of a substance or its properties because of a reaction with its environment." From a geotechnical viewpoint, the "environment" is the prevailing foundation soils and the "substances" are the reinforced concrete foundations or various buried metallic elements such as rebar, piles, pipes, etc., which are in direct contact with or within close vicinity of the foundation soil. In general, soil environments that are detrimental to concrete have high concentrations of soluble sulfates and/or pH values of less than 5.5. ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.2.1, provides specific guidelines for the concrete mix design when the soluble sulfate content of the soils exceeds 0.1 percent by weight or 1,000 ppm. The minimum amount of chloride ions in the soil environment that are corrosive to steel, either in the form of reinforcement protected by concrete cover, or plain steel substructures such as steel pipes or piles, is 500 ppm per California Test 532. Based on site soil testing, the onsite soils are classified as having a negligible sulfate exposure condition in accordance with ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.2.1. As a preliminary recommendation due to results of sulfate content testing, concrete in contact with onsite soils should be designed in accordance with ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.2.1 for the So/negligible category. It is also our opinion that onsite soils should be preliminarily considered corrosive to buried metals. The client and/or other members of the design team should consider this potential as they determine necessary. LGC is not a corrosion consultant and does not provide recommendations related to corrosion. 4.6 Nonstructural Concrete Flatwork Concrete Flatwork Concrete flatwork (such as walkways, patios, entryways, etc.) have a high potential for cracking due to changes in soil volume related to soil -moisture fluctuations because these slabs are typically much thinner than foundation slabs and are not reinforced with the same dynamic as foundation elements. To reduce the potential for excessive cracking and lifting, concrete should be designed in accordance with the minimum guidelines outlined below in Table 6. These guidelines will reduce the potential for irregular cracking and promote cracking along construction joints, but will not eliminate all cracking or lifting. Thickening the concrete and/or adding additional reinforcement will further reduce cosmetic distress. Project i y ouncil 18 — 839 1 3 , 2021 TABLE 6 Nonstructural Concrete Flatwork Minimum Thickness in. 4 Presaturation Presoak to 12 inches Reinforcement No. 3 at 24 inches on centers or 6x6 No. 6 x No. 6 WWM Crack Control Joints Saw cut or deep open tool joint to a minimum of 1/3 the concrete thickness Maximum Joint Spacing 5 feet Pedestrian Concrete Pavers Concrete pavers should be installed per manufactures recommendations. The following are considered minimum recommendations for the concrete pavers and are not meant to supersede more restrictive manufactures recommendations. Concrete pavers should be designed to be underlain by a minimum of 1 inch of leveling sand over a minimum of approximately 4-inches of compacted aggregate base. The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture -conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Tile Pavers Tile pavers should be installed per manufactures recommendations. The following are considered minimum recommendations for the tile pavers and are not meant to supersede more restrictive manufactures recommendations. Tile pavers should be designed to be underlain by a minimum of 4 inches thick concrete reinforced with No. 3 rebar at 24-inches on center each way or 6x6 No. 6 x No. 6 WWM over a minimum of approximately 4-inches of compacted aggregate base. The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture -conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Refer to manufacturer's specification if a vapor barrier should be installed. 4.7 Swimminz Pool The proposed pool and associated improvements should be constructed in accordance with the attached Figure 4, Geotechnical Guidelines for Swimming Pool Construction. Pool excavation will occur in newly placed compacted fills and is anticipated to be relatively uniform. Consideration should be given to the high expansive potential of onsite soils in design of the pool, and associated decking. Also concrete in contact with onsite soils should be designed in accordance with the So/negligible category of ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.2.1. Project i y ouncil 18 — 840 1 3 , 2021 Due to inherent differences in supporting capacity and expansive potential of different layers of the alluvium/fill, it is undesirable to have structures partially supported on soils having different geotechnical characteristics or materials having different engineering characteristics. If a cut/fill transition or expansive soil condition exists, the cut portion of the transition or expansive soil should be excavated (usually impractical for pool/spa construction), or the pool/spa can be designed with additional reinforcement and/or a thicker shell in order to cope with potential differences in supporting capacity and expansive potential. Excavation and subsequent fill placement for pool including the placement of drains, outlets, water- proofing, etc. should be performed under the observation and testing of a geotechnical consultant. Observation and testing should be performed by the geotechnical consultant during pool excavation to verify that the exposed soil conditions are consistent with the design assumptions. Concrete flatwork adjacent to the pool should be a minimum of 5 inches thick reinforced with No. 3 rebar at 24-inches on center each way with a 18-inch deep perimeter cut-off footing. Construction joints or weakened plane joints should be provided in all flatwork to a minimum depth of 1.5 inches at frequent internals (5 feet or less). The concrete slab should be underlain by a minimum of 4 inches of clean sand or base. Presoaking of the subgrade should be performed to a minimum depth of 12 inches. The subgrade should be inclined so that any moisture that seeps through cracks in the concrete due to irrigation, rain, or pool splash will be directed away from the pool. 4.8 Control of Surface Water and Drainage Control Positive drainage of surface water away from structures is very important. No water should be allowed to pond adjacent to buildings. Positive drainage may be accomplished by providing drainage away from buildings at a gradient of at least 2 percent for a distance of at least 5 feet, and further maintained by a swale or drainage path at a gradient of at least 1 percent. Where necessary, drainage paths may be shortened by use of area drains and collector pipes. Planters with open bottoms adjacent to buildings should be avoided. Planters should not be designed adjacent to buildings unless provisions for drainage, such as catch basins, liners, and/or area drains, are made. Overwatering must be avoided. 4.9 Construction Observation and Testing The recommendations provided in this report are based on limited subsurface observations and geotechnical analysis. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction by a representative of LGC. Geotechnical observation and testing should be performed by the geotechnical consultant during site excavations, subgrade for slab/foundation, backfill of utility trenches, preparation of any subgrade and placement of aggregate base, or when any unusual soil conditions are encountered at the site. Grading plans, foundation plans, and final project drawings should be reviewed by this office prior to construction. Project i y ouncil 18 — 841 1 3 , 2021 5.0 LIMITATIONS Our services were performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The samples taken and submitted for laboratory testing, the observations made, and the in -situ field testing performed are believed representative of the entire project; however, soil and geologic conditions revealed by excavation may be different than our preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the project soils engineer and geologist and design(s) adjusted as required or alternate design(s) recommended. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his/her representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and/or project engineer and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and/or subcontractor properly implements the recommendations in the field. The contractor and/or subcontractor should notify the owner if they consider any of the recommendations presented herein to be unsafe. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can and do occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Project i y 66n,61 18 — 842 1 3 , 2021 •.a,f. �, +e. - --ter _- _ tih ?r e Legend: oakThree-story town homes Five -story wrap with parking structure r fir, f B-LGC-1 • LGC approximate location of Hollow Stem Auger Boring b-L Alta approximate location of Hollow Stem Auger Boring Q Alta approximate location of I Infiltration Test .P ._ I • .�+�^ • � - 1 R �• ice. 1 R illy 41 ri • R n Vr 1 �J = w C' ] V - map, I' AJ - I _ Figure 2• Project Name Santa Ana Boring Location Project No. 213031-01 Map Eng. B I H/M W u n FF / Santa Ana 1 -S 3 NQtMik 23 City of Santa Ana, California Date 12/ 16/21 NATIVE BACKFILL COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION PER ASTM1557-D IY��II�II�I�I�I WATER PROOFING PER CIVIL ENGINEER FREE DRAINING SAND BACKFILL SE 30 OR GREATER BACKCUT PER OSHA FENCE EXTENT OF FREE DRAINING SAND BACKFILL, MINIM HEEL WIDTH OR H/2 WHICH EVER IS GREATER II = r LD 1I I w MINIMUM 1 CUBIC FOOT PER LINEAR FOOT BURRITO TYPE SUBDRAIN, CONSISTING OF 3/4 INCH CRUSHED ROCK WRAPPED IN7-7 - �-M-- MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT I. 4 INCH DIAMETER, SCHEDULE 40 PERFORATED I I. PVC PIPE TO FLOW TO DRAINAGE DEVICE d FOOTING/WALL DESIGN PER CIVIL ENGINEER ° a d d I I Figure 3 Retaining Wall Project Name FF / Santa Ana Project No. 213031-01 Eng. BIH/MW Backfill 1 s - Date I 1 SCHEDULE Depth of Lateral Slope creep APPENDIX A References Alta California Geotechnical Inc., 2021, Geotechnical Investigation, 1901 and 1971 E. 4th Street and 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, APN: 400-051-02, -09, -14, and -15, City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, California. Project No. 1-0396, dated July 21, 2021. American Concrete Institute, 1985, Manual of Concrete Practice, Parts 1 and 2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2017, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-16, 2017. ASCE 7 Hazard Tool, htt2s://asce7hazardtool.online/ California Building Standards Commission, 2019, California Building Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Volumes 1 and 2, dated July 2019. California Geological Survey, 1997, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, dated March 13, 1997, SP 117. 1998, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Tustin 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Orange County, California, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 012, dated 1998. Hart, E. W., and Bryant, W.A., 1997, Fault -Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zone Maps: California Division of Mines and Geology, SP 42. Ishihara, K., 1985, "Stability of Natural Deposits During Earthquakes". Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. A.A. Bakema Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas, with Locations and Ages of Recent Volcanic Eruptions: California Division of Mines and Geology, California Geologic Data Map Series, Map No. 6, Scale 1:750,000. Post -Tensioning Institute, 2006, Design of Post Tensioned Slabs -on -ground, Third Addition, Addendum 1 dated May 2007, and Addendum 2 Dated May 2008. Pradel, D., 1998, "Procedure to Evaluate Earthquake Induced Settlements in Dry Sandy Soils", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 4, April 1998. Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y., Egan, J.A., Makdisi, F., and Youngs, R.R. (1997), "Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data," Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 180-189. P'" ity Council18 — 846 32021 APPENDIX A Re erences (cont) Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F., and Chungh, R.M., 1985, "Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 111, No. 12, December 1985. Southern California Earthquake Center, 1999, Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction in California, dated March 1999. Tokimatsu, Kohji, and Seed, H.B., "Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 8, August 1987. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2008a, "2008 National Seismic Hazard Maps — Fault Parameters" Retrieved December 17, 2013, from: hLtp://geohazards.usas.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_search/hf search main.cfin 2008b, "2008 Interactive Deaggregations (Beta)," Retrieved December 12, 2013, from: htq2s:Haeohazards.usas.gov/deafzaint/2008/ 20139 U.S. Seismic Design Maps, Retrieved December 12, 2013, from: http://aeohazards.usgs.gov/designmqps/usibatch.php#cs P'" ity Council18 — 847 32021 APPENDIX B Boring Lo,-s Pro ity Counci 18 — 848 fM 65 Geotechnical Boring Log B-1 Date: November 22, 2021 Page: 1 of 2 Project Name: FF/Santa Ana Project Number: 213031-01 Drilling Compan : Martini Drilling Type of Rig: Hollow Stem Drive Weight:140 pounds Drop: 30 inches Hole Dia: 8 inches Elevation of Top of Hole:148 Feet Hole Location: See Geotechnical Ma DESCRIPTION O E : Q o o O U O O Cn Logged By: MET co Q 0 � O �' � _N 0 w CU i CU Cn m o O U) Z) Sampled By: MET 148 0 AC 5" No Base #A @ ML Alluvium: 1'-3' 1 7 __ __ @2.5': slightly reddish -brown very fine sandy SILT; medium stiff, damp 143 5 / 2 11 -- -- CL @5': slightly reddish -brown very fine sandy CLAY; SA medium stiff, damp @7.5': slightly reddish -brown very fine to silty CN 3 9 100.E 5.1 SM SAND; loose, damp 138 10 4 12 102.7 23.3 CL @10': medium brown very fine silty to sandy CLAY; medium stiff, moist 11 -- @12.5': slightly reddish -brown very fine sandy 5 -- ML SILT; medium stiff, damp 133 15 -- @15': red -brown fine to clayey SAND; very loose, SA 6 4 -- $C dam • minor gravel <: 7 4.1 SM 21 114.6 @17.5': red -brown fine to medium SAND; medium CN dense, damp; minor coarse fraction 128 20 8 __ SP 18 __ @20': medium brown to pale yellow -brown SA medium to coarse SAND; medium dense, damp 17 109.5 @22.5': slightly reddish -brown very fine sandy 9 11.3 ML SILT; stiff, damp 123 25 // s _- @25': red -brown to medium brown very fine to 10 _- ML/CL / clayey SILT to silty CLAY; medium stiff, damp 5 -- @27.5': medium brown silty CLAY; medium stiff, SA 11 -- CL 1118 moist 30 el / LGC VALLEY, INC. = Ring Sample THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS BORING AND AT THE TIME OF DRILLING.SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT = SPT THISLOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF THEACTUAL CONDITIOND ENCOUNTERED. uty uouncll "I t5 — ti4J -I U/.i/LUL.i Geotechnical Boring Log B-1 Date: November 22, 2021 Page: 2 of 2 Project Name: FF/Santa Ana Project Number: 213031-01 Drilling Compan : Martini Drilling Type of Rig: Hollow Stem Drive Weight:140 pounds Drop: 30 inches Hole Dia: 8 inches Elevation of Top of Hole:148 Feet Hole Location: See Geotechnical Ma DESCRIPTION O E Q o o O U O O Cn Logged By: MET co Q 0 � O �' � _N 0 w CU o i cD CU Cn m o O U) Z) Sampled By: MET 118 30 12 5 -- -- CL/ML Alluvium: @30': red -brown to medium brown very fine to silty CLAY to clayey SILT; medium stiff, moist 7 -- @32.5': reddish -brown sandy to clayey SAND; SA 13 -- $C loose, damp 113 35 14 14 -- -- SP/SM @35': pale yellow -brown to red -brown fine to SA medium SAND; medium dense, damp; minor clay @36': encountered rocks 71 @37.5': pale yellow -brown to red -brown fine to 15 -- -- $W gravelly SAND; very dense, slightly damp; rocks in sampler 108 40 16 35 -- __ @40': medium brown to red -brown medium to coarse SAND; dense, damp; minor gravel 17 38 __ __ @42.5': becomes slightly silty 103 45 18 x 32 -- 7.5 SM @45': red -brown silty to medium SAND; dense, SA damp; minor gravel 28 -- @47.5': red -brown clayey SAND to silty SAND; SHA, 19 16.1 SC/SM medium dense to stiff, slightly damp to damp AL 98 50 - 43 __ @50': pale yellow -brown to red -brown fine to 20 __ SW gravelly SAND; dense, slightly damp Total Depth = 51.5 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled 11/22/2021 with Native Soil 93 55 I H I LGC VALLEY, INC. = Ring Sample THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS BORING AND AT THE TIME OF 8MLI DRILLING.SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT = SPT THISLOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF THEACTUAL CONDITIOND ENCOUNTERED. uty uourlcll "I t5 — tsou -I U/.i/LUL.i Geotechnical Boring Log B-2 Date: November 22, 2021 Page: 1 of 2 Project Name: FF/Santa Ana Project Number: 213031-01 Drilling Compan : Martini Drilling Type of Rig: Hollow Stem Drive Weight:140 pounds Drop: 30 inches Hole Dia: 8 inches Elevation of Top of Hole:148 Feet Hole Location: See Geotechnical Ma DESCRIPTION O E Q o o O U O O Cn Logged By: MET co Qco O �' _N "O 0 w O i CB Cn m o U) Z) Sampled By: MET 148 0 AC 4" No Base #A @ ML Alluvium: 1'-5' 1 $ -- -- @2.5': slightly reddish -brown very fine sandy SILT; medium stiff, damp 143 5 2 12 -- -- CL @5': Slightly reddish -brown sandy CLAY; medium stiff, damp; minor organic SA 16 @75: red -brown fine to silty SAND; loose, damp 3 101 5.3 SM 138 10 4 2.6 ML 20 98.3 @10': red -brown very fine sandy SILT; stiff, damp; CN minor gravel; minor organics / -- @12.5': red -brown to pale yellow -brown fine to 5 14 -- CL / medium sandy CLAY to red -brown very fine to / silty CLAY; stiff, damp; minor coarse fraction 133 15 � / 6 14 -- -- 7 14 -- -- 128 20 // / 8 15 -- -- SA 9 15 -- -- 123 25 / / 10 15 11 -- @27.5': red -brown clayey to medium SAND to 15 -- SC/CL sandy CLAY; medium dense to stiff, damp; rare 118 30 / coarse fraction LGC VALLEY, INC. = Ring Sample THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS BORING AND AT THE TIME OF DRILLING. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS = SPT LOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF THE ACTUAL CONDITIOND ENCOUNTERED. uty uounc11 "I b — 001 -1 U/3/LUL3 Geotechnical Boring Log B-2 Date: November 22, 2021 Page: 2 of 2 Project Name: FF/Santa Ana Project Number: 213031-01 Drilling Compan : Martini Drilling Type of Rig: Hollow Stem Drive Weight:140 pounds Drop: 30 inches Hole Dia: 8 inches Elevation of Top of Hole:148 Feet Hole Location: See Geotechnical Ma DESCRIPTION O E Q o o O U O O Cn Logged By: MET co Q 0 � O �' � _N 0 w CU i CU Cn m o O U) Z) Sampled By: MET 118 30 12 13 -- -- CL Alluvium: @30': red -brown clayey to sandy CLAY; stiff, SA / damp; rare coarse fraction 14 -- @32.5': red -brown fine sandy CLAY; stiff, damp 13 -- CL 113 35 14 18 -- @35': red -brown clayey to medium SAND to -- SC/CL sand CLAY; medium dense to very stiff, dam Y Y p, rare gravel 15 -- SW 53 -- @37.5': pale yellow -brown to red -brown fine to gravelly SAND; very dense, slightly damp 108 40 -- -- SC 16 22 -- @40': red -brown silty to clayey SAND; medium SA dense, damp; rare coarse fraction -- SW/ML 17 25 -- @42.5': pale yellow -brown fine to gravelly SAND to red -brown fine to sandy SILT; medium dense to very stiff, slightly damp 103 45 18 27 -- __ @45': pale yellow -brown medium to gravelly SAND to red -brown very fine to clayey SILT; medium dense to very stiff, slightly damp 23 -- @47.5': red -brown silty to medium CLAY to sandy AL 19 17.4 CL / Y , CLAY; very stiff, dam • minor gravel p, 98 50 8 -- @50': red -brown fine sandy to silty CLAY; medium SHA / 20 21.1 CL stiff, damp to moist Total Depth = 51.5 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled 11/22/2021 with Native Soil 93 55 LGC VALLEY, INC. = Ring Sample THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS BORING AND AT THE TIME OF DRILLING. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS = SPT LOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF THE ACTUAL CONDITIOND ENCOUNTERED. uity uourlcll "I t5 — tsoz -I U/.S/LUL.S Geotechnical Boring Log B-3 Date: November 22, 2021 Page: 1 of 2 Project Name: FF/Santa Ana Project Number: 213031-01 Drilling Compan : Martini Drilling Type of Rig: Hollow Stem Drive Weight:140 pounds Drop: 30 inches Hole Dia: 8 inches Elevation of Top of Hole:148 Feet Hole Location: See Geotechnical Ma DESCRIPTION O E : Q o o O U O O Cn co Q 0 � � _N 0 Logged By: MET w CU o i cD CU Cn O m �' o O U) Z) Sampled By: MET 148 0 AC 5" No Base #A @ ML Alluvium: 1'-5' 1 6 -- -- @2.5': medium brown fine sandy SILT; soft, slightly damp; rare calcium carbonate veining 143 5 2 7 96.2 23.6 @5': medium stiff CN 18 @7.5': red -brown fine to clayey SAND; SA 3 -- -- $C medium stiff, damp 138 10 4 17 101.3 5.3 SW @10': red -brown fine to medium SAND; medium stiff, damp; rare coarse fraction .......... 7 -- @12.5': red -brown fine to very fine sandy CLAY; / 5 -- CL medium stiff, damp / 133 15 / // 6 10 108.4 9.6 / 7 5 -- -- / SHA 128 20 // / 8 13 -- 13.8 @20': gains minor gravel AL 9 15 __ __ @22.5': becomes stiff 123 25 10 -- SM 39 -- @25': red -brown fine to silty SAND; medium dense, damp; rare coarse fraction 11 27 -- L 30 LGC VALLEY, INC. = Ring Sample THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS BORING AND AT THE TIME OF 1E DRILLING.SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT = SPT THISLOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF THEACTUAL CONDITIOND ENCOUNTERED. uity uouncll "I b — 6015 -1 U/.i/LUL.i Geotechnical Boring Log B-3 Date: November 22, 2021 Project Name: FFISanta Ana Drilling Company: Martini Drilling Drive Weight:140 pounds Elevation of Top of Hole:148 Feet O U O O U E : O o co > a> Q Q O U O Q � N o w co cn m o 118 1 30 111111111 12 22 -- -- ®iim�= Project Number: 213031-01 Type of Rig: Hollow Stem Drop: 30 inches Hole Location: See Geotechnical DESCRIPTION 0 E >, U) Logged By: MET Z) Sampled By: MET Page: 2 of 2 1 Hole Dia: 8 inches ML Alluvium: @30': red -brown very fine SILT; stiff, moist @32.5': becomes slightly clayey 113 35 �' u 14 15 -- CL @35': red -brown silty CLAY; stiff, damp 15 W 12 I -- I -- I I @37.5': gains minor gravel SA 108 40 -- - 16 X 67 -- -- SW1@42.5': @40': pale yellow -brown to red -brown fine to medium gravelly SAND; very dense, slightly damp 17 49 becomes dense 103 45 18 63 -- -- @45': becomes very dense 22 -- @47.5': red -brown very fine clayey SILT; very stiff, SHA 1911 16.7 ML damp 98 50 X 18 __ @50': red -brown very fine to clayey SILT; very AL 20 __ ML stiff, damp; minor coarse fraction Total Depth = 51.5 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled 11/22/2021 with Native Soil 1 93 —1 55 LGC VALLEY, INC. = Ring Sample THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS BORING AND AT THE TIME OF DRILLING.SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT = SPT THISLOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF THE VOELI ACTUAL CONDITIOND ENCOUNTERED. City Council 18-854 Key to Boring Logs GW SW �' CL MH GP SP - - OL CH r r SM ML r r OH r r SC PT 7 APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER LEVEL Symbol Laboratory Test SA Sieve Analysis H Hydrometer Anlysis SHA Sieve & Hydrometer Analysis -200 Percent Passing #200 Sieve AL Atterburge Limits MAX Maximum Density DS Undisturbed Direct Shear RDS Remolded Direct Shear TRI Triaxial Shear El Expansion Index P Permeability CNI Consolidation CoL Collapse UC Unconfined Compression S Sulfate Content pH R pH & Resistivity CoR Corrosion Suite (pH, Resistivity, Chloride, Sulfate) RV R-Value City Council 18 — 855 10/3/2023 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Major Divisions grf Itr Description Major Divisions grf Itr Well -graded gravels or gravel sand t GW Inorganic silts and very fine sands, Gravel mixtures, little or no fines Silts ML rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands and And or clavey silts with sli ht plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium Gravelly Soils GP Poorly -graded gravels or gravel Clays $, sand mixture, little or no fines LL,<50 CL plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy More clays, silty clays, lean clays GM Silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt Coarse mixtures Organic silts and organic silt -clays .an50% of coarse fraction Grained OL Of IOW p18StlClty Grained relained Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay on No, 4 sieve GC mixtures Soils Inorganic silts, micaceous or Soils MH diatomaceous fine or silty soils, -- — Well -graded sands or gravelly Sand - SW sands, little or no fines Af ore than 5Css, passes Silts e18S11C SIIfS Inorganic clays of high plasticity, 9 Y 9 P ty, More than and eor on No 20o And SIP sands or gravelly retained on Sandy sieve sieve Clays VH fat clays No 200 Soils .:., sands, little or no fines LL,<50 _ sieve Organic clays of medium to high M°`° mansoi ' : SM Silt sands, sand -silt mixtures Y OH plasticity ofcoarse ---- _. fracM1on ,SC Clayey sands, and -clay mixtures Highly Organic PT Peat and other highly organic soils onallo- 4 sieve Soils ovulvUHl[ r I,LAooir II,H I Iurv: boos possessing characteristics of two groups are designated by combinations of group symbols PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS U.S. STANDARD SERIES SIEVE CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENINGS 200 40 10 4 3/4" 3" 12" Silts Sand Gravel and Cobbles Boulders Clays Fine Medium Coarse_ Fine Coarse y� RELATIVE DENSITY Sands and Gravels Blows/Foot (SPT) Very Loose <4 Loose 4-10 Medium Dense 11-30 Dense 31-50 Very Dense >50 LABORATORY TESTS Symbol Test Direct Shear DS DSR Direct Shear CON (Remolded) SA Sieve Analysis MAX Maximum Density RV Resistance (R) Value El Expansion Index SE Sand Equivalent AL Atterberg Limits CHEM Chemical Analysis HY Hydrometer Analysis KEY T CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION Silts and Clays Criteria Very Soft Thumb penetrates soil >1 in. Soft Thumb penetrates soil 1 in, Firm Thumb penetrates soil 1/4 in Stiff Readily indented with thumbnail Very Stiff Thumbnail will not indent soil SOIL MOISTURE Increasing V6sual Moisture Content Dry - Dry to touch Moist - Damp, but no visible free water wet - Visible free water HARDNESS Bedrock Soft Moderately Hard Hard Very Hard SIZE PROPORTIONS Trace - <5% Few - 5 to 10% Some - 15 to 25% ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL INC. City Council 18 — 856 10/3/2023 PLATE B GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 140 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. B-1 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o �Qo w a— w « � m = H �� U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 SM 4" Asphalt over no base. YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few clay. 5 135 16 MIL @5.0ft. SANDY SILT, light brown to brown, moist, stiff. 7.2 100 29 R SM ----------------------------- @6.0ft. SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense. 10 130 16 3.7 98 14 CON, R HY 15 125 21 @15.0ft. trace fine to coarse gravel <1 ". 8.5 121 61 R 20 120 19 10.8 110 56 R 25 115 23 @25.0ft. trace clay, trace fine to coarse gravel <1". 14.1 110 75 R TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE 4i Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' FBIBU TUBE SAMPLE : BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 857 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-1 S: SHEAR RS: RUPTURE SURFACE S GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 141 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. B-2 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o �Qo w a— w « � m = H �� U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 MIL 4" Asphalt over no base. YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): CLAYEY SILT w/SAND, brown, 140 B moist, firm, fine to medium grained sand MAX, El, HY, CHEM 5 21 SM @5.0ft. SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, moist, medium dense 10.1 108 51 R 135 trace roots. 10 22 @10.0ft. few fine to coarse gravel <1 ". 2.4 R 130 15 19 8.3 110 44 R 125 20 14 8.8 104 40 R 120 25 24 12.7 110 66 R 115 TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE 4i Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' FBIBU TUBE SAMPLE : BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 858 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-2 S: SHEAR RS: RUPTURE SURFACE S GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 143 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. B-3 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o �Qo w a— w « � m = H �� U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 SM 4" Asphalt over no base. YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few clay. 140 5 6 @5.0ft. loose, trace roots. 10.9 103 48 R 135 10 21 @10.0ft. No Recovery R 130 15 15 12.2 110 64 R 125 20 15 @20.0ft. trace clay. 10.6 100 43 R 120 25 21 @25.0ft. trace fine gravel <1/2". 18.6 101 77 R TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE 4i Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' FBIBU TUBE SAMPLE : BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 859 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-3 S S: SHEAR RS: RUPTURE SURFACE GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 143 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. B-4 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o �Qo w a— w Q� � m = H �� U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 SM 3" Asphalt over no base. YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few clay. 140 5 10 SC @5.0ft. CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, brown, moist, loose. 18.6 107 90 R SM ------------ -- ---- --- --- @6.0ft. SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, loose. 135 10 8 14.1 104 63 R 130 15 17 @15.0ft. medium dense. 16.7 114 99 R 125 20 16 13.5 97 51 R 120 25 16 18.8 105 87 R TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE 4i Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. MS I nc' FBIBU TUBE SAMPLE : BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 860 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-4 S: SHEAR RS: RUPTURE SURFACE S GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 145 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. B-5 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o �Qo w a— w « � m = H �� U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 5" Asphalt over no base. SM YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, loose, few clay. g 15.6 105 71 R 5 140 10 @5.0ft. trace roots. 11.7 104 53 R 10 135 9 @10.0ft. trace fine gravel <1/2". 14.9 110 78 R 15 130 10 @15.0ft. fine to coarse grained, loose, few fine to coarse gravel 15.6 108 78 R 20 125 72 SM @20.0ft. SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, fine to coarse grained, brown, 3.2 R o.. moist, very dense, fine gravel <1/2". C 25 120 16 0 4111 @25.0ft. No Recovery. R TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE 4i Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' FBIBU TUBE SAMPLE : BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 861 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-5 S: SHEAR RS: RUPTURE SURFACE S GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 144 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. B-6 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o �Qo w a— w Q� � m = H �� U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 SM 4" Asphalt over no base. YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): CLAYEY SILT w/SAND, brown, B moist, firm, fine to medium grained sand MAX, El, HY, 140 CHEM 5 15 SM @5.0ft. SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium 6.8 107 33 CON, R dense HY 135 10 18 @10.0ft. No Recovery. R 130 15 16 11.8 111 65 R 125 20 17 9.9 104 45 R 120 25 17 @25.0ft. trace clay. 13.0 114 77 R TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE 4i Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' FBIBU TUBE SAMPLE : BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 862 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-6 S: SHEAR RS: RUPTURE SURFACE S GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 148 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. B-7 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o �Qo w a— w « � m = H �� U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 5" Asphalt over no base. SM YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few clay. 145 6 @2.5ft.loose 24.1 94 85 R 5 8 @5.0ft. few clay. 8.5 110 45 R 140 10 g 10.1 97 38 R 135 15 15 @15.0ft. medium dense. 12.1 115 73 R 130 20 12 9.0 103 39 R 125 25 18 @25.0ft. trace fine to coarse gravel <1.5". 11.6 111 63 R TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE 4i Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' FBIBU TUBE SAMPLE : BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 863 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-7 S: SHEAR RS: RUPTURE SURFACE S GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 142 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. B-8 BY FIR w� a— w w �a 2r « � o m } OJ o = H J �m �� U) GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION w. � ;z Qp 20 a� z Ofw �0 o �Qo o w o w SM 4" Asphalt over no base. YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium 140 grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few clay. 12 @2.5ft. trace roots. 14.8 98 57 R 5 8 @5.0ft. loose, trace fine to coarse gravel <1.5". 10.8 103 47 R 135 10 7 SC @10.0ft. CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist loose. 17.5 108 87 R 130 15 g SM — — — — — — — — — — — — -- @15.0ft. SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, loose, trace fine gravel <1/2". 9.6 110 51 R 125 20 21 SP @20.0ft. No Recovery, SAND, fine to coarse grained, brown, slightly R moist, medium dense, few fine gravel <1/2", few silt. 120 25 15 SM @25.- ft. SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist 19.5 102 82 R medium dense, trace clay. TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE 1 GROUNDWATER ► SEEPAGE 4i Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' FBIBU TUBE SAMPLE P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-8 : BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 864 S: SHEAR RS: RUPTURE SURFACE S GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 145 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. P-1 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o ° GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o cn< W a— w Q� � m = H (D} U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 SM YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few clay. 5 140 @5.Oft. loose, trace roots. TOTAL DEPTH 5.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' ® BU TUBE SAMPLE BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 865 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-9 S: S: SHEAR IRS: RUPTURE SURFACE GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 148 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. P-2 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o ° GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o cn< W a— w Q� � m = H (D} U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 SM YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, loose, few clay. 145 5 @5.Oft. few clay. TOTAL DEPTH 5.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. D s I nc' ® BU TUBE SAMPLE BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 866 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-10 S: S: SHEAR IRS: RUPTURE SURFACE GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NO. DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED DRILLER TYPE OF DRILL RIG 1-0396 7/7/21 7/7/21 2R Drilling Inc. 8" Hollow Stem Auger PROJECT NAME 4th St. and Cabrilla Park Dr. GROUND ELEV. 142 BORING GW DEPTH (FT) LOGGED DRIVE WT. 140lbs NOTE DROP 30 in. DESIG. P-3 BY FIR w �a } OJ �m w. � a� �0 w w� 2r o o ° GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ;z z o cn< W a— w « � m = H (D} U) Qp Ofw o o J 20 SM YOUNGER FAN DEPOSITS(Qyf): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few clay. 140 5 @5.Oft. loose, trace fine to coarse gravel <1.5". TOTAL DEPTH 5.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SAMPLE TYPES: 1 GROUNDWATER ® RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE ► SEEPAGE Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. © B I nc' ® BU TUBE SAMPLE BEDDING F: FAULT 18 — 867 P.N. 1-0396 10/3/2023PLATE B-11 S: S: SHEAR IRS: RUPTURE SURFACE APPENDIX C Laboratory Testing Results by EGLAB. Inc. Laboratory testing was performed by EGLAB, Inc. The laboratory testing program was directed towards providing quantitative data relating to the relevant engineering properties of the soils. Samples considered representative of site conditions were tested in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedure and/or California Test Methods (CTM), where applicable. The following summary is a brief outline of the test type and the results are presented on the following pages. LGC has reviewed the laboratory test data, procedures and results performed by EGLAB, Inc. (EGL) with respect to the subject site and concurs with and accepts responsibility as geotechnical engineer of record for their work (laboratory testing). Moisture and Density Determination Tests: Moisture content (ASTM D2216) and dry density determinations (ASTM D2937) were performed on relatively undisturbed samples obtained from the test borings and/or trenches. The results of these tests are presented in the boring logs. Where applicable, only moisture content was determined from undisturbed or disturbed samples. Soil Classification: Soils were classified according the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) in accordance with ASTM Test Methods D2487 and D2488. This system uses relies on the Atterberg Limits and grain size distribution of a soil. The soil classifications (or group symbol) are shown on the laboratory test data, and boring logs. Expansion Index: The expansion potential of selected samples were evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, U.B.C. Standard No. 18-2 and/or ASTM D4829. Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately the optimum moisture content and approximately 50 percent saturation or approximately 90 percent relative compaction. The prepared 1-inch-thick by 4-inch-diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water until volumetric equilibrium is reached. Sample Location Sample Description Expansion Index Expansion Potential B-LGC-2 @1-5' Sandy SILT 101 High Maximum Densi , Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM D1557. Sample Location Sample Description Maximum Dry Density (pcf) Optimum Moisture Content (%) B-LGC-3 @ 1-5' Sandy CLAY 122.5 12.5 Pro' ity Counu 18 — 868 1 021 � Atterber Limits: imits: The liquid and plastic limits ("Atterberg Limits") were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D4318 for engineering classification of fine-grained material. Sample Location Liquid Limit (%) I Plastic Limit (%) I Plasticity Index (%) B-LGC-1 @45' Non -Plastic Non -Plastic Non -Plastic B-LGC-1 @47.5' 21 16 5 B-LGC-2 @47.5' 25 18 7 B-LGC-3 @20' 29 17 12 B-LGC-3 @50' 27 17 10 Chloride Content: Chloride content was tested in accordance with Caltrans Test Method (CTM) 422. The results are presented below: Sample Location Chloride Content, ppm B-LGC-1 @1-5' 130 Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate contents of selected samples were determined by standard geotechnical methods (CTM 417). The soluble sulfate content is used to determine the appropriate cement type and maximum water -cement ratios. The test results are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Sulfate Content (%)* Sulfate Exposure** B-LGC-1 @1-5' Clayey SAND 0.009 Negligible/SO *Expressed as the percentage of water-soluble sulfate (SO4) in soil, percentage by weight. ** ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.1.1 Minimum Resistivi , and pH Tests: Minimum resistivity and pH tests were performed in general accordance with CTM 643 and standard geochemical methods. The electrical resistivity of a soil is a measure of its resistance to the flow of electrical current. As a results of soil's resistivity decreases corrosivity increases. The results are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description pH Minimum Resistivity (ohms -cm) LGC B-1 @1-5' Clayey Sand 7.76 2100 Consolidation: Consolidation tests were performed on selected, relatively undisturbed ring samples (Modified ASTM Test Method D2435). Samples (2.42 inches in diameter and 1 inch in height) were placed in a consolidometer and increasing loads were applied. The samples were allowed to consolidate under "double drainage" and total deformation for each loading step was recorded. The percent consolidation for each load step was recorded as the ratio of the amount of vertical compression to the original sample height Project No. 213031-01 Page C-2 December 16, 2021 City Council 18 — 869 10/3/2023 Grain Size Distribution: Representative samples were dried, weighed, and soaked in water until individual soil particles were separated (per ASTM D421) and then washed on a No. 200 sieve. The portion retained on the No. 200 sieve was dried and then sieved on a U.S. Standard brass sieve set in accordance with ASTM D422 (CTM 202). Sample Location % Passing # 200 Sieve % Clay 135o B-LGC-1 @5' 42.8 - 0.1 B-LGC-1 @15' 34 - 0.19 B-LGC-1 @20' 2.5 - 0.48 B-LGC-1 @27.5' 68.1 - - B-LGC-1 @32.5' 37.3 - 0.15 B-LGC-1 @35' 8.6 - 0.34 B-LGC-1 @47.5' 42.8 13.4 0.13 B-LGC-2 @5' 56.4 - - B-LGC-2 @20' 64.6 - - B-LGC-2 @30' 55.6 - - B-LGC-2 @40' 48.3 - 0.08 B-LGC-2 @50' 57.3 17.9 0.56 B-LGC-3 @7.5' 32.4 - 0.24 B-LGC-3 @17.5' 70.6 24.9 0.23 B-LGC-3 @35' 72.9 - - B-LGC-3 @50' 52.8 14.3 0.66 Hyrdo-consolidation: Hydro -consolidation tests (collapse) were performed on selected, relatively undisturbed ring samples (ASTM D4546). Samples were placed in a consolidometer and a load approximately equal to the in -situ overburden pressure was applied. Water was then added to the sample and the percent hydro -consolidation under the applied load was measured. The percent for the load was calculated as the ratio of the amount of vertical deformation to the original sample height. The percent hydroconsolidation is presented is the following graphs. Project No. 213031-01 Page C-3 December 16, 2021 City Council 18 - 870 10/3/2023 PROJECT NAME: FF / Santa Ana PROJECT NO.: 213031-01 DATE: 12/15/2021 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS EGLAB JOB NO.: 21-059-022 CLIENT: LGC Valley, Inc. SUMMARIZED BY JT BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. DEPTH (in.) MOISTURE CONTENT ASTM D2216 N DRY DENSITY ASTM D2937 (PCF) ATTERBERG LIMITS ASTM D4318 -(LL,PL,PI) B-1 4 10.0 23.3 102.7 B-1 9 22.5 11.3 109.5 B-1 18 45.0 7.5 Non Plastic B-1 19 47.5 16.1 21,16,5 B-2 3 7.5 5.3 101.0 B-2 19 47.5 17.4 25,18,7 B-2 20 50.0 21.1 B-3 4 10.0 5.3 101.3 B-3 6 15.0 9.6 108.4 B-3 8 20.0 13.8 29,17,12 B-3 19 47.5 16.7 B-3 20 50.0 27,17,10 'LL,PL,PI = LIQUID LIMIT, PLASTIC LIMIT, PLASTICITY INDEX City Council 18 — 871 10/3/2023 SUMMARY OF CORROSION TEST RESULTS PROJECT NAME: FF / Santa Ana PROJECT NO.: 213031-01 DATE: 12/14/2021 EGLAB JOB NO.: 21-059-022 CLIENT: LGC Valley, Inc. Summarized By: JT Chloride Sulfate Minimum pH Content Content Resistivity BORING SAMPLE DEPTH CalTrans CalTrans CalTrans CalTrans NO. NO. 643 422 417 643 (ft) (ppm) (% by weight) (ohm -cm) B-1 A 1 1.0-3.0 1 7.76 1 130 0.009 2,100 City Council 18 — 872 10/3/2023 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS EXPANSION INDEX PROJECT NAME: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB JOB NO.: 21-059-022 PROJECT NO.: 213031-01 DATE: 12/15/2021 CLIENT: LGC Valley, Inc. SUMMARIZED BY: JT EXPANSION BORING SAMPLE DEPTH INDEX NO. NO. (ft) ASTM D 4829 F—B-2 A 1.0-5.0 101 City Council 18 — 873 10/3/2023 150 140 130 110 100 90 + 0 Method "A" 5 10 15 20 25 Moisture Content % Maximum Dry Density = 122.5 pcf Optimum Moisture Content = 12.5 % EGLAB, INC. Modified Proctor Project Name 30 Boring No: B-3 Sample: A Depth : 1.0-5.0 feet Sandy clay (CL), very brown, trace of gravel Client Name: Job No.: EGLAB Project No FF / Santa Ana 35 gra LGC Valley, Inc. 213031-01 21-059-022 0 SATURATED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 8 z O 9 Q 210 O 11 LU 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0.1 1 10 100 COMPRESSIVE STRESS (KSF) Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client: Job No.: LGC Valley, Inc. 213031-01 EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 CONSOLIDATION Figure Symbol Boring Sample Depth Soil In it. Moisture In it. Dry Density In it. Void No. No. (Ft.) Type Content (%) (PCF) Ratio 0 B-1 3 7.5 SM 5.1 100.6 0.675 0 1 SATt RAT 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 8 z O 9 F Q 210 O 11 LU 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0.1 1 10 100 COMPRESSIVE STRESS (KSF) Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client: Job No.: LGC Valley, Inc. 213031-01 EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 CONSOLIDATION Figure Boring Sample Depth Soil Init. Moisture Init. Dry Density Init. Void Symbol No. No. (Ft.) Type Content (%) (PCF) Ratio 0 B-1 7 17.5 SM 4.1 114.E 0.470 0 1 S TU R TE 2 3 4-77 5 6 7 0 8 z O 9 Q 210 O 11 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0.1 1 10 100 COMPRESSIVE STRESS (KSF) Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client: Job No.: LGC Valley, Inc. 213031-01 EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 CONSOLIDATION Figure Boring Sample Depth Soil Init. Moisture Init. Dry Density Init. Void Symbol No. No. (Ft.) Type Content (%) (PCF) Ratio o B-2 4 10.0 SM 2.6 98.3 0.714 0 SATURATED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 8 z O 9 F Q 10 O 11 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0.1 1 10 100 COMPRESSIVE STRESS (KSF) Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client: Job No.: LGC Valley, Inc. 213031-01 EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 CONSOLIDATION Figure Boring Sample Depth Soil In it. Moisture In it. Dry Density In it. Void Symbol No. No. (Ft.) Type Content (%) (PCF) Ratio 0 B-3 2 5.0 M L 23.6 96.2 0.752 3000 2500 O Peak 2000 ❑ Ultimate Ln a Ln LU w P500 Q w N 1000 -0,000000 500 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 NORMAL PRESSURE (PSF) Note: Sample was remolded to 90 % maximum relative density and optimum moisture Maximum Dry Density: 122.5 pcf Optimum Moisture: 12.5 Project Address: Normal Initial Final FF / Santa Ana Stress Moisture Moisture A, EGLAB, I C. Client: LGC Valley, Inc. (psf) N N Project No.: 213031-01 500 12.5 22.7 EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 1000 12.5 21.5 DIRECT SHEAR 2000 12.5 20.8 It Council 12/21 — 7 (ASTM D308 202 Figure Sample Sample Cohesion Friction Boring No. Depth (ft) Soil Type Symbol No. Type (PSF) Angle B-3 A 1.0-5.0 Bulk CL � 242 28 ❑ 116 28 GRAVEL I SAND SILT OR CLAY COARSE I FINE I COARS MEDIUM I FINE U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1 '/z" 3/4" 3/a" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 100 90 80 = 70 CD w 60 m w z 50 z w U LU 40 3 0 w a 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE (mm) BORING SAMPLE DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL No. No. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX B-1 19 47.5 SPT SC-SM 21 5 Clay 13.4% Gravel /Sand 57.2% Silt 29.4% City Council 18 — 880 10/3/2023 GRAVEL I SAND SILT OR CLAY COARSE I FINE I COARS F MEDIUM I FINE U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1 '/z" 3/a" 3/a" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 100 7 F37�,, 90 80 = 70 CD w 60 m LU w z 5 0 LL z w U LU 40 0 3 w a 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE (mm) BORING SAMPLE DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL No. No. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX B-2 20 50.0 SPT CL N/A N/A Clay 17.9% Gravel /Sand 42.7% Silt 39.4% City Council 18 — 881 10/3/2023 GRAVEL I SAND SILT OR CLAY COARSE I FINE I COARS MEDIUM I FINE U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1 '/z" 3/4" 3/a" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 100 90 80 = 70 CD w 60 m w z 50 LL z w U LU 40 3 0 w a 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE (mm) BORING SAMPLE DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL No. No. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX B-3 7 17.5 SPT CL N/A N/A Clay 24.9% Gravel /Sand 29.4% Silt 45.7% City Council 18 — 882 10/3/2023 GRAVEL I SAND SILT OR CLAY COARSE I FINE I COARS MEDIUM I FINE U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1 '/z" 3/a" 3/a" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 100 90 80 = 70 CD w 60 m w z 50 LL z w U LU 40 3 0 w a 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE (mm) BORING SAMPLE DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL No. No. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX B-3 19 47.5 SPT ML N/A N/A Clay 14.3% Gravel / Sand 47.2% Silt 38.5% City Council 18 — 883 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-1 2 5.0 Ring SC N/A N/A Gravel: 5.7% Sand: 51.5% Fine: 42.8% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 884 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-1 6 15.0 SPT SC N/A N/A Gravel: 9.7% Sand: 56.3% Fine: 34.0% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 885 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-1 8 20.0 SPT SP N/A N/A Gravel: 3.7% Sand: 93.8% Fine: 2.5% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 886 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-1 11 27.5 SPT CL N/A N/A Gravel: 0.0% Sand: 31.9% Fine: 68.1 % Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 887 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-1 13 32.5 SPT SC N/A N/A Gravel: 0.4% Sand: 62.3% Fine: 37.3% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 888 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-1 14 35.0 SPT SP-SM N/A N/A Gravel: 3.8% Sand: 87.6% Fine: 8.6% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 889 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-2 2 5.0 Ring CL N/A N/A Gravel: 0.1 % Sand: 43.5% Fine: 56.4% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 890 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-2 8 20.0 SPT CL N/A N/A Gravel: 0.1 % Sand: 35.3% Fine: 64.6% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 891 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-2 12 30.0 SPT CL N/A N/A Gravel: 1.0% Sand: 43.4% Fine: 55.6% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 892 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-2 16 40.0 SPT SC N/A N/A Gravel: 3.2% Sand: 48.5% Fine: 48.3% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 893 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-3 3 7.5 Ring SC N/A N/A Gravel: 0.0% Sand: 67.6% Fine: 32.4% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 894 10/3/2023 C� w m w z LL I— z W U w IL GRAVEL I SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 3" 1.5' 1" 3/4"1/2"3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm) 0.01 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE NO. (FT) TYPE TYPE LIMIT INDEX ❑ B-3 14 35.0 SPT CL N/A N/A Gravel: 0.6% Sand: 26.5% Fine: 72.9% Project Name: FF / Santa Ana EGLAB, INC. Client Job No.: 213031-01 Client Name: LGC Valley, Inc. EGLAB Project No.: 21-059-022 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 12/15/21 ASTM D422 FIGURE City Council 18 — 895 10/3/2023 TABLE C SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST DATA P.N.1-0396 Maximum Dry Density Grain Size Analysis E d E T .Ey Q o V E O ti C w y fq CD p E c lC e O O O O LO x C? C LwY Z Q L Ed d O a v >. N E E r o o O 'ac y L 3 U E £ ; N 13U .Q d .Q O .O .Q i ` N U X w O L m ❑ U) C9 cn O ❑ t9 e e o w i j U O B-1 10 Silty Sand (Qyf) SM - - 0 80 14 6 - - See Plate C-1 Min. Resistivity: 1,700 OHM -CM B-2 1-4 Clayey Silt w/Sand (Qyf) ML 117.2 13.7 1 21 40 38 94 ND Chloride: 15ppm PH: 7.94 Min. Resistivity: 680 OHM -CM B-6 1-4 Clayey Silt w/Sand (Qyf) ML 123.7 10.8 2 29 39 30 69 0.017 Chloride: 65ppm PH: 8.04 B-6 5 Silty Sand (Qyf) SM - 0 66 21 13 See Plate C-2 - Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. City Council 18 — 896 10/3/2023 borin depth ft. dry in situp in situ-2000 group g p ( ) density (pcf) moist. (/o) satur. (p ) sieve (/0) symbol typical names B-1 10.0 98 3.7 14 20 SM Silty Sand (Qyf) borin depth ft. dry in situp in situ-2000 group g p ( ) density (pcf) moist. (/o) satur. (p ) sieve (/0) symbol typical names B-6 5.0 107 6.8 33 34 SM Silty Sand (Qyf) APPENDIX D Liquefaction Analysis and Dry Sand Settlement Pro ity Counci - g _ ggg Y021 PARAMETERS USED IN LIQEFACTION ANALYSIS LGC Geotechnical Borings B-LGC-1 Depth of Sample ft Depth to Base (ft) Field Blow Count Dry Density PCF Liqid Limit % PlasticityEContent Index a/o ure % passing #200 o /o clay (0.005mm) Soil Type Not Liquefiable Based on Lab/Samples 0 5 107 101 ML R&R 5 7.5 7.3 107 42.8 CL 7.5 10 6 107 5.1 42.8 SM 10 12.5 8 107 23.3 68.1 CL 12.5 15 7.3 107 68.1 ML 15 17.5 4 107 34 SC 17.5 20 14 107 4.1 42.8 SM 20 22.5 18 107 2.5 SP 22.5 25 11.3 107 11.3 68.1 ML 25 27.5 6 107 68.1 ML/CL 27.5 30 5 107 68.1 CL 30 32.5 5 107 68.1 CL/ML 32.5 35 7 107 37.3 SC 35 37.5 14 107 8.6 SP/SM 37.5 40 71 107 8.6 SW 40 42.5 35 107 8.6 SW 42.5 45 38 107 8.6 SW 45 47.5 32 107 NP NP 7.5 8.6 SM 47.5 50 28 107 21 5 16.1 42.8 13.4 SC/SM 50 51.5 43 107 8.6 SW Note: PI : PI greater than 12 is non -liquefiable. NP: Non -plastic LL/M.C.: Moisture content is less than 85% of Liquid Limit, therefore non -liquefiable. R&R : Removal and recompaction of fill. Ring sample blow counts reduced by a factor of 0.67. % passing #200 equal 101 is non -liquefiable City Council 18 - 900 10/3/2023 PARAMETERS USED IN LIQEFACTION ANALYSIS LGC Geotechnical Borings B-LGC-2 Depth of Sample ft Depth to Base (ft) Field Blow Count Dry Density PCF Liqid Limit % Plasticity Index % Moisture Content % % passing #200 ° /° clay (0.005mm) Soil Type Not Liquefiable Based on Lab/Samples 0 5 100 101 ML R&R 5 7.5 8 100 56.4 CL 7.5 10 10.7 100 5.3 57.3 SM 10 12.5 13.3 100 2.6 57.3 ML 12.5 15 14 100 64.6 CL 15 17.5 14 100 64.6 CL 17.5 20 14 100 64.6 CL 20 22.5 15 100 64.6 CL 22.5 25 15 100 64.6 CL 25 27.5 15 100 64.6 CL 27.5 30 15 100 56.4 SC/CL 30 32.5 13 100 55.6 CL 32.5 35 14 100 55.6 CL 35 37.5 18 100 55.6 SC/CL 37.5 40 53 100 5 SW 40 42.5 22 100 48.3 SC 42.5 45 25 100 48.3 SW/ML 45 47.5 27 100 48.3 SW/ML 47.5 50 23 100 25 7 17.4 57.3 CL 50 51.5 8 100 1 21.1 57.3 17.9 CL/ML Note: PI : PI greater than 12 is non -liquefiable. NP: Non -plastic LL/M.C.: Moisture content is less than 85% of Liquid Limit, therefore non -liquefiable. R&R : Removal and recompaction of fill. Ring sample blow counts reduced by a factor of 0.67. % passing #200 equal 101 is non -liquefiable City Council 18 - 901 10/3/2023 PARAMETERS USED IN LIQEFACTION ANALYSIS LGC Geotechnical Borings B-LGC-3 Depth of Sample ft Depth to Base (ft) Field Blow Count Dry Density PCF Liqid Limit % Plasticity Index % Moisture Content % % passing #200 ° /° clay (0.005mm) Soil Type Not Liquefiable Based on Lab/Samples 0 5 102 101 ML R&R 5 7.5 4.7 102 23.6 70.6 ML 7.5 10 12.0 102 32.4 SC 10 12.5 11.4 102 5.3 5 SW 12.5 15 4.7 102 9.6 70.6 CL 15 17.5 6.7 102 70.6 CL 17.5 20 5 102 70.6 24.9 CL 20 22.5 8.7 102 29 12 13.8 70.6 CL 22.5 25 15 102 70.6 CL 25 27.5 26 102 32.4 SM 27.5 30 27 102 32.4 SM 30 32.5 14.7 102 70.6 ML 32.5 35 16 102 70.6 ML 35 37.5 15 102 72.9 CL 37.5 40 12 102 72.9 CL 40 42.5 67 102 5 SW 42.5 45 49 102 5 SW 45 47.5 63 102 5 SW 47.5 50 22 102 16.7 52.8 14.3 ML 5 51.5 18 102 27 10 70.6 ML Note: PI : PI greater than 12 is non -liquefiable. NP: Non -plastic LL/M.C.: Moisture content is less than 85% of Liquid Limit, therefore non -liquefiable. R&R : Removal and recompaction of fill. Ring sample blow counts reduced by a factor of 0.67. % passing #200 equal 101 is non -liquefiable City Council 18 - 902 10/3/2023 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS FF/Santa Ana Hole No.=B-LGC-1 Water Depth=40 ft Surface Elev.=148 Shear Stress Ratio Factor of Safety Settlement 0 1 0 1 5 0 (in.) 10 (ft)0 10 20 30 40 50 Shaded Zone has Liquefaction Potential 60 70 CivilTech Corporation Wet Dry— S=2.44 in. 213031-01 Magnitude=7.71 Acceleration=0.593g Soil Description Plate A-1 City Council 18 — 903 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS CALCULATION SHEET Copyright by CivilTech Software www.civiltech.com (425) 453-6488 Fax (425) 453-5848 Licensed to , 12/16/2021 9:19:01 AM Input File Name: \\DC1\Public2\FINAL PROJECTS\FAIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT\Santa Ana\Liquefaction\B-LGC-l.liq Title: FF/Santa Ana subtitle: 213031-01 surface Elev.=148 Hole No.=B-LGC-1 Depth of Hole= 51.5 ft water Table during Earthquake= 40.0 ft water Table during In -Situ Testing= 51.5 ft Max. Acceleration= 0.59 g Earthquake Magnitude= 7.7 Input Data: Surface Elev.=148 Hole No.=B-LGC-1 Depth of Hole=51.5 ft water Table during Earthquake= 40.0 ft water Table during In -situ Testing= 51.5 ft Max. Acceleration=0.59 g Earthquake Magnitude=7.7 Earthquake Magnitude=7.7 2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu / Seed 3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Idriss/seed (SPT only) 4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction' 5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones* 6. Hammer Energy Ratio, Ce = 1.3 7. Borehole Diameter, Cb= 1 8. Sampling Method, Cs= 1 9. user request factor of safety (apply to CSR) user= 1.0 Plot one CSR curve (fsl=User) 10. use Curve Smoothing: Yes* .: Recommended Options In -Situ Test Data: Depth SPT gamma Fines ft pcf 0.0 0.0 107.0 NoLiq 5.0 7.3 107.0 42.8 7.5 6.0 107.0 42.8 10.0 8.0 107.0 68.1 12.5 7.3 107.0 68.1 15.0 4.0 107.0 34.0 17.5 14.0 107.0 42.8 20.0 18.0 107.0 2.5 22.5 11.3 107.0 68.1 25.0 6.0 107.0 68.1 Page 1 City Council 18 - 904 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 27.5 5.0 107.0 68.1 30.0 5.0 107.0 68.1 32.5 7.0 107.0 37.3 35.0 14.0 107.0 8.6 37.5 71.0 107.0 8.6 40.0 35.0 107.0 8.6 42.5 38.0 107.0 8.6 45.0 32.0 107.0 8.6 47.5 28.0 107.0 42.8 50.0 43.0 107.0 8.6 51.5 43.0 107.0 8.6 Output Results: settlement of saturated sands=0.05 in. Settlement of dry sands=2.39 in. Total settlement of saturated and dry sands=2.44 in. Differential Settlement=1.222 to 1.613 in. Depth CRRm CSRfs F.S. S_sat. S_dry Sall ft in. in. in. 0.00 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.05 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.10 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.15 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.20 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.25 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.30 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.35 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.40 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.45 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.50 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 0.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 1.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 Page 2 City Council 18 - 905 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 2.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 2.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 3.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 4.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.00 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.05 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.10 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.15 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 Page 3 City Council 18 - 906 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 5.20 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.25 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.30 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.35 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.40 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.45 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.50 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.55 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.60 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.65 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.39 2.44 5.70 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.44 5.75 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 5.80 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 5.85 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 5.90 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 5.95 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 6.00 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 6.05 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 6.10 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 6.15 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 6.20 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 6.25 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 6.30 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.38 2.43 6.35 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.43 6.40 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.43 6.45 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.50 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.55 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.60 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.65 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.70 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.75 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.80 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.85 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.37 2.42 6.90 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.36 2.42 6.95 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.36 2.41 7.00 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.36 2.41 7.05 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.36 2.41 7.10 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.36 2.41 7.15 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.36 2.41 7.20 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.36 2.41 7.25 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.36 2.41 7.30 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.35 2.41 7.35 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.35 2.40 7.40 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.35 2.40 7.45 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.35 2.40 7.50 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.35 2.40 7.55 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.35 2.40 7.60 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.34 2.39 7.65 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.34 2.39 7.70 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.34 2.39 7.75 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.34 2.39 7.80 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.34 2.39 7.85 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.33 2.39 7.90 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.33 2.38 7.95 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.33 2.38 8.00 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.33 2.38 8.05 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.33 2.38 8.10 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.32 2.38 8.15 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.32 2.37 8.20 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.32 2.37 8.25 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.32 2.37 8.30 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.32 2.37 Page 4 City Council 18 - 907 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 8.35 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.31 2.37 8.40 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.31 2.36 8.45 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.31 2.36 8.50 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.31 2.36 8.55 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.31 2.36 8.60 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.31 2.36 8.65 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.30 2.36 8.70 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.30 2.35 8.75 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.30 2.35 8.80 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.30 2.35 8.85 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.30 2.35 8.90 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.30 2.35 8.95 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.29 2.34 9.00 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.29 2.34 9.05 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.29 2.34 9.10 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.29 2.34 9.15 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.29 2.34 9.20 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.28 2.33 9.25 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.28 2.33 9.30 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.28 2.33 9.35 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.28 2.33 9.40 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.28 2.33 9.45 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.27 2.32 9.50 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.27 2.32 9.55 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.27 2.32 9.60 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.27 2.32 9.65 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.26 2.32 9.70 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.26 2.31 9.75 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.26 2.31 9.80 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.26 2.31 9.85 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.25 2.31 9.90 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.25 2.30 9.95 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.25 2.30 10.00 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.25 2.30 10.05 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.24 2.30 10.10 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.24 2.29 10.15 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.24 2.29 10.20 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.24 2.29 10.25 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.24 2.29 10.30 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.24 2.29 10.35 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.24 2.29 10.40 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.24 2.29 10.45 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.23 2.29 10.50 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.23 2.28 10.55 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.23 2.28 10.60 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.23 2.28 10.65 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.23 2.28 10.70 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.23 2.28 10.75 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.23 2.28 10.80 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.23 2.28 10.85 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.22 2.28 10.90 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.22 2.27 10.95 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.22 2.27 11.00 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.22 2.27 11.05 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.22 2.27 11.10 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.22 2.27 11.15 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.22 2.27 11.20 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.22 2.27 11.25 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.21 2.27 11.30 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.21 2.26 11.35 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.21 2.26 11.40 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.21 2.26 11.45 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.21 2.26 Page 5 City Council 18 - 908 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 11.50 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.21 2.26 11.55 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.21 2.26 11.60 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.05 2.20 2.25 11.65 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.20 2.25 11.70 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.20 2.25 11.75 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.20 2.25 11.80 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.20 2.25 11.85 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.20 2.25 11.90 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.19 2.25 11.95 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.19 2.24 12.00 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.19 2.24 12.05 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.19 2.24 12.10 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.19 2.24 12.15 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.19 2.24 12.20 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.18 2.23 12.25 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.18 2.23 12.30 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.18 2.23 12.35 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.18 2.23 12.40 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.18 2.23 12.45 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.17 2.23 12.50 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.17 2.22 12.55 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.17 2.22 12.60 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.17 2.22 12.65 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.17 2.22 12.70 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.16 2.21 12.75 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.16 2.21 12.80 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.16 2.21 12.85 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.16 2.21 12.90 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.15 2.21 12.95 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.15 2.20 13.00 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.15 2.20 13.05 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.15 2.20 13.10 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.14 2.20 13.15 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.14 2.19 13.20 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.14 2.19 13.25 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.14 2.19 13.30 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.13 2.18 13.35 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.13 2.18 13.40 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.13 2.18 13.45 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.12 2.17 13.50 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.12 2.17 13.55 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.12 2.17 13.60 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.11 2.16 13.65 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.11 2.16 13.70 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.10 2.16 13.75 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.10 2.15 13.80 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.10 2.15 13.85 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.09 2.14 13.90 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.09 2.14 13.95 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.08 2.13 14.00 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.08 2.13 14.05 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.07 2.12 14.10 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.07 2.12 14.15 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.06 2.11 14.20 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.06 2.11 14.25 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.05 2.10 14.30 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.05 2.10 14.35 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.04 2.09 14.40 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.03 2.09 14.45 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.03 2.08 14.50 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.02 2.07 14.55 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.01 2.07 14.60 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.01 2.06 Page 6 City Council 18 - 909 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 14.65 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 2.00 2.05 14.70 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.99 2.04 14.75 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.98 2.04 14.80 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.98 2.03 14.85 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.97 2.02 14.90 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.96 2.01 14.95 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.95 2.01 15.00 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.95 2.00 15.05 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.94 1.99 15.10 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.93 1.98 15.15 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.92 1.97 15.20 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.92 1.97 15.25 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.91 1.96 15.30 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.90 1.96 15.35 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.90 1.95 15.40 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.89 1.94 15.45 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.89 1.94 15.50 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.88 1.94 15.55 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.88 1.93 15.60 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.88 1.93 15.65 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.87 1.92 15.70 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.87 1.92 15.75 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.86 1.92 15.80 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.86 1.91 15.85 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.86 1.91 15.90 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.85 1.91 15.95 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.85 1.90 16.00 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.85 1.90 16.05 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.85 1.90 16.10 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.84 1.89 16.15 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.84 1.89 16.20 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.84 1.89 16.25 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.84 1.89 16.30 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.83 1.88 16.35 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.83 1.88 16.40 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.83 1.88 16.45 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.83 1.88 16.50 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.82 1.88 16.55 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.82 1.87 16.60 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.82 1.87 16.65 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.82 1.87 16.70 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.82 1.87 16.75 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.82 1.87 16.80 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.81 1.87 16.85 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.81 1.86 16.90 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.81 1.86 16.95 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.81 1.86 17.00 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.81 1.86 17.05 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.81 1.86 17.10 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.81 1.86 17.15 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.80 1.85 17.20 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.80 1.85 17.25 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.80 1.85 17.30 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.80 1.85 17.35 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.80 1.85 17.40 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.80 1.85 17.45 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.80 1.85 17.50 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.85 17.55 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.84 17.60 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.84 17.65 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.84 17.70 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.84 17.75 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.84 Page 7 City Council 18 - 910 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 17.80 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.84 17.85 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.84 17.90 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.79 1.84 17.95 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.84 18.00 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.83 18.05 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.83 18.10 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.83 18.15 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.83 18.20 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.83 18.25 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.83 18.30 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.83 18.35 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.78 1.83 18.40 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.77 1.83 18.45 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.77 1.82 18.50 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.77 1.82 18.55 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.77 1.82 18.60 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.77 1.82 18.65 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.77 1.82 18.70 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.77 1.82 18.75 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.77 1.82 18.80 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.76 1.81 18.85 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.76 1.81 18.90 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.76 1.81 18.95 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.76 1.81 19.00 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.76 1.81 19.05 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.76 1.81 19.10 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.75 1.81 19.15 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.75 1.80 19.20 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.75 1.80 19.25 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.75 1.80 19.30 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.75 1.80 19.35 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.75 1.80 19.40 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.74 1.79 19.45 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.74 1.79 19.50 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.74 1.79 19.55 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.74 1.79 19.60 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.74 1.79 19.65 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.73 1.78 19.70 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.73 1.78 19.75 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.73 1.78 19.80 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.73 1.78 19.85 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.72 1.77 19.90 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.72 1.77 19.95 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.72 1.77 20.00 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.71 1.77 20.05 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.71 1.76 20.10 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.71 1.76 20.15 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.71 1.76 20.20 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.70 1.75 20.25 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.70 1.75 20.30 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.70 1.75 20.35 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.70 1.75 20.40 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.69 1.74 20.45 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.69 1.74 20.50 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.69 1.74 20.55 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.69 1.74 20.60 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.68 1.74 20.65 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.68 1.73 20.70 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.68 1.73 20.75 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.68 1.73 20.80 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.68 1.73 20.85 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.67 1.73 20.90 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.67 1.72 Page 8 City Council 18 - 911 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 20.95 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.67 1.72 21.00 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.67 1.72 21.05 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.67 1.72 21.10 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.67 1.72 21.15 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.66 1.71 21.20 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.66 1.71 21.25 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.66 1.71 21.30 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.66 1.71 21.35 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.66 1.71 21.40 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.65 1.71 21.45 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.65 1.70 21.50 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.65 1.70 21.55 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.65 1.70 21.60 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.65 1.70 21.65 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.65 1.70 21.70 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.64 1.69 21.75 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.64 1.69 21.80 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.64 1.69 21.85 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.64 1.69 21.90 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.64 1.69 21.95 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.64 1.69 22.00 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.64 1.69 22.05 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.64 1.69 22.10 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.63 1.69 22.15 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.63 1.68 22.20 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.63 1.68 22.25 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.63 1.68 22.30 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.63 1.68 22.35 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.63 1.68 22.40 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.63 1.68 22.45 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.63 1.68 22.50 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.62 1.67 22.55 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.62 1.67 22.60 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.62 1.67 22.65 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.62 1.67 22.70 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.62 1.67 22.75 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.05 1.62 1.67 22.80 0.19 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.61 1.67 22.85 0.19 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.61 1.66 22.90 0.19 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.61 1.66 22.95 0.19 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.61 1.66 23.00 0.19 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.61 1.66 23.05 0.19 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.61 1.66 23.10 0.18 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.60 1.65 23.15 0.18 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.60 1.65 23.20 0.18 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.60 1.65 23.25 0.18 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.60 1.65 23.30 0.18 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.60 1.65 23.35 0.18 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.59 1.64 23.40 0.18 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.59 1.64 23.45 0.17 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.59 1.64 23.50 0.17 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.59 1.64 23.55 0.17 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.58 1.64 23.60 0.17 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.58 1.63 23.65 0.17 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.58 1.63 23.70 0.17 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.58 1.63 23.75 0.16 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.57 1.63 23.80 0.16 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.57 1.62 23.85 0.16 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.57 1.62 23.90 0.16 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.57 1.62 23.95 0.16 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.56 1.61 24.00 0.16 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.56 1.61 24.05 0.16 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.56 1.61 Page 9 City Council 18 - 912 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 24.10 0.15 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.56 1.61 24.15 0.15 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.55 1.60 24.20 0.15 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.55 1.60 24.25 0.15 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.55 1.60 24.30 0.15 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.54 1.59 24.35 0.15 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.54 1.59 24.40 0.15 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.54 1.59 24.45 0.14 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.53 1.58 24.50 0.14 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.53 1.58 24.55 0.14 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.52 1.57 24.60 0.14 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.52 1.57 24.65 0.14 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.52 1.57 24.70 0.14 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.51 1.56 24.75 0.14 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.51 1.56 24.80 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.50 1.55 24.85 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.50 1.55 24.90 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.49 1.54 24.95 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.49 1.54 25.00 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.48 1.53 25.05 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.48 1.53 25.10 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.47 1.52 25.15 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.47 1.52 25.20 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.46 1.51 25.25 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.46 1.51 25.30 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.45 1.50 25.35 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.45 1.50 25.40 0.13 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.44 1.49 25.45 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.44 1.49 25.50 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.43 1.48 25.55 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.43 1.48 25.60 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.42 1.47 25.65 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.41 1.46 25.70 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.41 1.46 25.75 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.40 1.45 25.80 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.40 1.45 25.85 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.39 1.44 25.90 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.38 1.44 25.95 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.38 1.43 26.00 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.37 1.42 26.05 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.37 1.42 26.10 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.36 1.41 26.15 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.35 1.40 26.20 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.35 1.40 26.25 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.34 1.39 26.30 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.33 1.39 26.35 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.33 1.38 26.40 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.32 1.37 26.45 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.31 1.37 26.50 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.31 1.36 26.55 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.30 1.35 26.60 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.29 1.35 26.65 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.29 1.34 26.70 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.28 1.33 26.75 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.27 1.32 26.80 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.27 1.32 26.85 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.26 1.31 26.90 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.25 1.30 26.95 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.24 1.30 27.00 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.24 1.29 27.05 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.23 1.28 27.10 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.22 1.27 27.15 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.21 1.27 27.20 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.21 1.26 Page 10 City Council 18 - 913 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 27.25 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.20 1.25 27.30 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.19 1.24 27.35 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.18 1.23 27.40 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.18 1.23 27.45 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.17 1.22 27.50 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.16 1.21 27.55 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.15 1.20 27.60 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.14 1.19 27.65 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.13 1.18 27.70 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.13 1.18 27.75 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.12 1.17 27.80 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.11 1.16 27.85 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.10 1.15 27.90 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.09 1.14 27.95 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.08 1.13 28.00 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.08 1.13 28.05 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.07 1.12 28.10 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.06 1.11 28.15 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.05 1.10 28.20 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.04 1.09 28.25 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.04 1.09 28.30 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.03 1.08 28.35 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.02 1.07 28.40 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.01 1.06 28.45 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 1.00 1.05 28.50 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.99 1.05 28.55 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.99 1.04 28.60 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.98 1.03 28.65 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.97 1.02 28.70 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.96 1.01 28.75 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.95 1.00 28.80 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.94 0.99 28.85 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.94 0.99 28.90 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.93 0.98 28.95 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.92 0.97 29.00 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.91 0.96 29.05 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.90 0.95 29.10 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.89 0.94 29.15 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.88 0.93 29.20 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.87 0.93 29.25 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.87 0.92 29.30 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.86 0.91 29.35 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.85 0.90 29.40 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.84 0.89 29.45 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.83 0.88 29.50 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.82 0.87 29.55 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.81 0.86 29.60 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.80 0.85 29.65 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.79 0.84 29.70 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.78 0.83 29.75 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.77 0.83 29.80 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.77 0.82 29.85 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.76 0.81 29.90 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.75 0.80 29.95 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.74 0.79 30.00 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.73 0.78 30.05 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.72 0.77 30.10 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.71 0.76 30.15 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.70 0.75 30.20 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.69 0.74 30.25 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.68 0.73 30.30 0.11 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.67 0.72 30.35 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.66 0.71 Page 11 City Council 18 - 914 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 30.40 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.65 0.71 30.45 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.65 0.70 30.50 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.64 0.69 30.55 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.63 0.68 30.60 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.62 0.67 30.65 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.61 0.66 30.70 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.60 0.65 30.75 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.59 0.65 30.80 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.59 0.64 30.85 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.58 0.63 30.90 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.57 0.62 30.95 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.56 0.61 31.00 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.55 0.60 31.05 0.12 0.36 5.00 0.05 0.54 0.60 31.10 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.54 0.59 31.15 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.53 0.58 31.20 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.52 0.57 31.25 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.51 0.56 31.30 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.51 0.56 31.35 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.50 0.55 31.40 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.49 0.54 31.45 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.48 0.53 31.50 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.48 0.53 31.55 0.12 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.47 0.52 31.60 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.46 0.51 31.65 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.45 0.50 31.70 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.45 0.50 31.75 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.44 0.49 31.80 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.43 0.48 31.85 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.42 0.48 31.90 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.42 0.47 31.95 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.41 0.46 32.00 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.40 0.45 32.05 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.40 0.45 32.10 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.39 0.44 32.15 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.38 0.43 32.20 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.38 0.43 32.25 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.37 0.42 32.30 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.36 0.41 32.35 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.36 0.41 32.40 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.35 0.40 32.45 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.34 0.39 32.50 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.34 0.39 32.55 0.13 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.33 0.38 32.60 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.32 0.37 32.65 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.32 0.37 32.70 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.31 0.36 32.75 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.31 0.36 32.80 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.30 0.35 32.85 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.29 0.34 32.90 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.29 0.34 32.95 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.28 0.33 33.00 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.28 0.33 33.05 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.27 0.32 33.10 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.27 0.32 33.15 0.14 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.26 0.31 33.20 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.26 0.31 33.25 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.25 0.30 33.30 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.25 0.30 33.35 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.24 0.29 33.40 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.24 0.29 33.45 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.23 0.28 33.50 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.23 0.28 Page 12 City Council 18 - 915 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 33.55 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.22 0.27 33.60 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.22 0.27 33.65 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.21 0.26 33.70 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.21 0.26 33.75 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.20 0.25 33.80 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.20 0.25 33.85 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.19 0.24 33.90 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.19 0.24 33.95 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.18 0.23 34.00 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.18 0.23 34.05 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.17 0.22 34.10 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.17 0.22 34.15 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.16 0.22 34.20 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.16 0.21 34.25 0.15 0.35 5.00 0.05 0.15 0.21 34.30 0.15 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.15 0.20 34.35 0.15 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.15 0.20 34.40 0.15 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.14 0.19 34.45 0.15 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.14 0.19 34.50 0.15 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.13 0.18 34.55 0.15 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.13 0.18 34.60 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.12 0.17 34.65 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.12 0.17 34.70 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.11 0.16 34.75 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.10 0.16 34.80 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 34.85 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.09 0.14 34.90 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.09 0.14 34.95 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.08 0.13 35.00 0.14 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.08 0.13 35.05 0.15 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.07 0.12 35.10 0.16 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.06 0.12 35.15 0.17 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.06 0.11 35.20 0.18 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.06 0.11 35.25 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 35.30 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 35.35 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 35.40 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 35.45 0.24 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.04 0.10 35.50 0.25 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.04 0.09 35.55 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.04 0.09 35.60 0.29 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.04 0.09 35.65 0.31 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.04 0.09 35.70 0.34 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.04 0.09 35.75 0.45 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.04 0.09 35.80 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.04 0.09 35.85 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.09 35.90 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 35.95 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.00 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.05 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.10 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.15 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.20 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.25 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.30 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.35 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.40 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.45 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.50 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.55 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.60 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.65 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 Page 13 City Council 18 - 916 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 36.70 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.75 1.80 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.80 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.85 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.03 0.08 36.90 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.08 36.95 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.08 37.00 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.08 37.05 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.10 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.15 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.20 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.25 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.30 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.35 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.40 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.45 1.79 0.34 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.50 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.55 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.60 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.65 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.70 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.75 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.80 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.85 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.90 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 37.95 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.00 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.05 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.10 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.15 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.20 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.25 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.30 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.35 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.40 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.45 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.50 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 38.55 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.07 38.60 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.07 38.65 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 38.70 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 38.75 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 38.80 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 38.85 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 38.90 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 38.95 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.00 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.05 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.10 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.15 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.20 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.25 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.30 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.35 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.40 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.45 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.50 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.55 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.60 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.65 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.70 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 39.75 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.06 39.80 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 Page 14 City Council 18 - 917 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 39.85 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 39.90 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 39.95 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.00 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.05 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.10 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.15 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.20 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.25 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.30 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.35 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.40 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.45 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.50 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.55 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.60 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.65 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.70 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.75 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.80 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.85 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.90 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 40.95 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.00 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.05 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.10 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.15 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.20 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.25 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.30 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.35 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.40 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.45 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.50 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.55 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.60 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.65 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.70 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.75 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.80 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.85 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.90 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 41.95 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.00 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.05 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.10 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.15 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.20 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.25 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.30 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.35 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.40 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.45 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.50 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.55 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.60 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.65 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.70 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.75 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.80 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.85 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.90 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 42.95 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 Page 15 City Council 18 - 918 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 43.00 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.05 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.10 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.15 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.20 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.25 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.30 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.35 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.40 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.45 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.50 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.55 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.60 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.65 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.70 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.75 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.80 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.85 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.90 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 43.95 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 44.00 0.40 0.33 1.22 0.05 0.00 0.05 44.05 0.38 0.33 1.15 0.05 0.00 0.05 44.10 0.37 0.33 1.11 0.05 0.00 0.05 44.15 0.36 0.33 1.08 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.20 0.35 0.33 1.05 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.25 0.34 0.33 1.03 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.30 0.34 0.33 1.01 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.35 0.33 0.33 1.00* 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.40 0.33 0.33 0.98* 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.45 0.32 0.33 0.97* 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.50 0.32 0.33 0.96* 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.55 0.31 0.33 0.95* 0.04 0.00 0.04 44.60 0.31 0.33 0.94* 0.03 0.00 0.03 44.65 0.31 0.33 0.93* 0.03 0.00 0.03 44.70 0.30 0.33 0.92* 0.03 0.00 0.03 44.75 0.30 0.33 0.91* 0.03 0.00 0.03 44.80 0.30 0.33 0.90* 0.03 0.00 0.03 44.85 0.30 0.33 0.89* 0.03 0.00 0.03 44.90 0.29 0.33 0.88* 0.03 0.00 0.03 44.95 0.29 0.33 0.87* 0.02 0.00 0.02 45.00 0.29 0.33 0.87* 0.02 0.00 0.02 45.05 0.29 0.33 0.88* 0.02 0.00 0.02 45.10 0.30 0.33 0.89* 0.01 0.00 0.01 45.15 0.30 0.33 0.91* 0.01 0.00 0.01 45.20 0.31 0.33 0.93* 0.01 0.00 0.01 45.25 0.32 0.33 0.95* 0.01 0.00 0.01 45.30 0.32 0.33 0.97* 0.01 0.00 0.01 45.35 0.33 0.33 1.00* 0.01 0.00 0.01 45.40 0.34 0.33 1.03 0.01 0.00 0.01 45.45 0.36 0.33 1.08 0.01 0.00 0.01 45.50 0.38 0.33 1.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.55 1.72 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.60 1.72 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.65 1.72 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.70 1.72 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.75 1.72 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.80 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.85 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.90 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.95 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.00 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.05 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.10 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 16 City Council 18 - 919 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 46.15 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.20 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.25 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.30 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.35 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.40 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.45 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.50 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.55 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.60 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.65 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.70 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.75 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.80 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.85 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.90 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.95 1.71 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.00 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.05 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.10 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.15 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.20 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.25 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.30 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.35 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.40 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.45 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.50 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.55 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.60 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.65 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.70 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.75 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.80 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.85 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.90 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.95 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.00 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.05 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.10 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.15 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.20 1.70 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.25 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.30 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.35 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.40 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.45 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.50 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.55 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.60 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.65 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.70 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.75 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.80 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.85 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.90 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.95 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.00 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.05 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.10 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.15 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.20 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.25 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 17 City Council 18 - 920 10/3/2023 B-LGC-l.sum 49.30 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.35 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.40 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.45 1.69 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.50 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.55 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.60 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.65 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.70 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.75 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.80 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.85 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.90 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.95 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.05 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.10 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.15 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.20 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.25 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.30 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.35 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.40 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.45 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.50 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.55 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.60 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.65 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.70 1.68 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.75 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.80 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.85 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.90 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.95 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.00 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.05 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.10 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.15 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.20 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.25 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.30 1.67 0.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.35 1.67 0.33 4.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.40 1.67 0.33 4.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.45 1.67 0.33 4.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.50 1.67 0.33 4.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 * F.S.<l, Liquefaction Potential zone (F.S. is limited to 5, CRR is limited to 2, CSR is limited to 2) Units Depth = ft, Stress or Pressure = tsf (atm), Unit weight = pcf, settlement = in. CRRm Cyclic resistance ratio from soils CSRfs Cyclic stress ratio induced by a given earthquake (with user request factor of safety) F.S. Factor of safety against liquefaction, F.S.=CRRm/CSRfs S_sat Settlement from saturated sands S_dry settlement from dry sands Sall Total settlement from saturated and dry sands NoLiq No -Liquefy soils Page 18 City Council 18 - 921 10/3/2023 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS FF/Santa Ana Hole No.=B-LGC-2 Water Depth=40 ft Surface Elev.=148 Shear Stress Ratio Factor of Safety Settlement 0 1 0 1 5 0 (in.) 10 (ft)0 10 20 30 40 50 fs 1— Shaded Zone has Liquefaction Potential 60 70 CivilTech Corporation Wet Dry- S = 1.50 in. 213031-01 Magnitude=7.71 Acceleration=0.593g Soil Description Plate A-1 City Council 18 — 922 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS CALCULATION SHEET Copyright by CivilTech Software www.civiltech.com (425) 453-6488 Fax (425) 453-5848 Licensed to , 12/16/2021 9:21:08 AM Input File Name: \\DC1\Public2\FINAL PROJECTS\FAIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT\Santa Ana\Liquefaction\B-LGC-2.liq Title: FF/Santa Ana subtitle: 213031-01 surface Elev.=148 Hole No.=B-LGC-2 Depth of Hole= 51.5 ft water Table during Earthquake= 40.0 ft water Table during In -Situ Testing= 51.5 ft Max. Acceleration= 0.59 g Earthquake Magnitude= 7.7 Input Data: Surface Elev.=148 Hole No.=B-LGC-2 Depth of Hole=51.5 ft water Table during Earthquake= 40.0 ft water Table during In -situ Testing= 51.5 ft Max. Acceleration=0.59 g Earthquake Magnitude=7.7 Earthquake Magnitude=7.7 2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu / Seed 3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Idriss/seed (SPT only) 4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction' 5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones* 6. Hammer Energy Ratio, Ce = 1.3 7. Borehole Diameter, Cb= 1 8. Sampling Method, Cs= 1 9. user request factor of safety (apply to CSR) user= 1.0 Plot one CSR curve (fsl=User) 10. use Curve Smoothing: Yes* .: Recommended Options In -Situ Test Data: Depth SPT gamma Fines ft pcf 0.0 0.0 100.0 NoLiq 5.0 8.0 100.0 56.4 7.5 10.7 100.0 57.3 10.0 13.3 100.0 57.3 12.5 14.0 100.0 64.6 15.0 14.0 100.0 64.6 17.5 14.0 100.0 64.6 20.0 15.0 100.0 64.6 22.5 15.0 100.0 64.6 25.0 15.0 100.0 64.6 Page 1 City Council 18 - 923 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 27.5 15.0 100.0 56.4 30.0 13.0 100.0 55.6 32.5 14.0 100.0 55.6 35.0 18.0 100.0 55.6 37.5 53.0 100.0 5.0 40.0 22.0 100.0 48.3 42.5 25.0 100.0 48.3 45.0 27.0 100.0 48.3 47.5 23.0 100.0 57.3 50.0 8.0 100.0 57.3 51.5 8.0 100.0 57.3 Output Results: settlement of saturated sands=0.86 in. Settlement of dry sands=0.64 in. Total settlement of saturated and dry sands=1.50 in. Differential Settlement=0.751 to 0.991 in. Depth ft CRRm CSRfs F.S. S_sat in. 0.00 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.05 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.10 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.15 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.20 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.25 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.30 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.35 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.40 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.45 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.50 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.86 0.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 1.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 2.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 Page 2 s_dry Sall in. in. .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 .64 1.50 City Council 18 - 924 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 2.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 2.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 3.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 4.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.00 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.05 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.10 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.15 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 Page 3 City Council 18 - 925 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 5.20 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.25 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.30 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.35 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.40 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.45 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.50 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.55 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.60 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.65 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.70 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.75 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.50 5.80 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.49 5.85 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.49 5.90 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.64 1.49 5.95 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.00 0.24 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.05 0.24 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.10 0.24 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.15 0.24 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.20 0.24 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.25 0.24 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.30 0.24 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.35 0.25 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.40 0.25 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.45 0.25 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.50 0.25 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.55 0.25 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.60 0.25 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.65 0.25 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.70 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.75 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.80 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.85 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.90 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 6.95 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.49 7.00 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.48 7.05 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.48 7.10 0.26 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.63 1.48 7.15 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.20 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.25 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.30 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.35 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.40 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.45 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.50 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.55 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.60 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.65 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.70 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.75 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.80 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.85 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.90 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 7.95 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 8.00 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 8.05 0.27 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 8.10 0.28 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.48 8.15 0.28 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.47 8.20 0.28 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.62 1.47 8.25 0.34 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.30 0.34 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 Page 4 City Council 18 - 926 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 8.35 0.34 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.40 0.34 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.45 0.34 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.50 0.34 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.55 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.60 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.65 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.70 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.75 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.80 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.85 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.90 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 8.95 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 9.00 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 9.05 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 9.10 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 9.15 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 9.20 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 9.25 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 9.30 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.47 9.35 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.46 9.40 0.38 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.46 9.45 0.38 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.46 9.50 0.38 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.61 1.46 9.55 0.38 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 9.60 0.39 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 9.65 0.39 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 9.70 0.39 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 9.75 0.40 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 9.80 0.40 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 9.85 0.41 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 9.90 0.41 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 9.95 0.42 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.00 0.43 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.05 0.42 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.10 0.41 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.15 0.41 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.20 0.40 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.25 0.40 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.30 0.39 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.35 0.39 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.40 0.39 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.45 0.39 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.46 10.50 0.38 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.45 10.55 0.38 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.60 1.45 10.60 0.38 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 10.65 0.38 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 10.70 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 10.75 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 10.80 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 10.85 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 10.90 0.37 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 10.95 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.00 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.05 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.10 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.15 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.20 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.25 0.36 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.30 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.35 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.40 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.45 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 Page 5 City Council 18 - 927 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 11.50 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.55 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.45 11.60 0.35 0.38 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.44 11.65 0.35 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.44 11.70 0.35 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.59 1.44 11.75 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 11.80 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 11.85 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 11.90 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 11.95 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.00 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.05 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.10 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.15 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.20 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.25 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.30 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.35 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.40 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.45 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.50 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.55 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.44 12.60 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.43 12.65 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.43 12.70 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.58 1.43 12.75 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 12.80 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 12.85 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 12.90 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 12.95 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.00 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.05 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.10 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.15 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.20 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.25 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.30 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.35 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.40 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.45 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.43 13.50 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.42 13.55 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.57 1.42 13.60 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 13.65 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 13.70 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 13.75 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 13.80 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 13.85 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 13.90 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 13.95 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 14.00 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 14.05 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 14.10 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 14.15 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 14.20 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.42 14.25 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.41 14.30 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.56 1.41 14.35 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.40 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.45 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.50 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.55 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.60 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 Page 6 City Council 18 - 928 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 14.65 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.70 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.75 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.80 0.35 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.85 0.35 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.90 0.35 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 14.95 0.35 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.41 15.00 0.35 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.40 15.05 0.35 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.55 1.40 15.10 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.15 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.20 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.25 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.30 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.35 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.40 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.45 0.34 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.50 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.55 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.60 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.65 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.70 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.40 15.75 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.54 1.39 15.80 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 15.85 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 15.90 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 15.95 0.33 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.00 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.05 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.10 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.15 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.20 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.25 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.30 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.35 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.39 16.40 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.38 16.45 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.53 1.38 16.50 0.32 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.55 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.60 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.65 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.70 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.75 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.80 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.85 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.90 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 16.95 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.38 17.00 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.37 17.05 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.52 1.37 17.10 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.15 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.20 0.31 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.25 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.30 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.35 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.40 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.45 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.50 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.37 17.55 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.36 17.60 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.51 1.36 17.65 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 17.70 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 17.75 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 Page 7 City Council 18 - 929 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 17.80 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 17.85 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 17.90 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 17.95 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 18.00 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 18.05 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.36 18.10 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.50 1.35 18.15 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.35 18.20 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.35 18.25 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.35 18.30 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.35 18.35 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.35 18.40 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.35 18.45 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.35 18.50 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.35 18.55 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.34 18.60 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.49 1.34 18.65 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.34 18.70 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.34 18.75 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.34 18.80 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.34 18.85 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.34 18.90 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.34 18.95 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.34 19.00 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.34 19.05 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.48 1.33 19.10 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.33 19.15 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.33 19.20 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.33 19.25 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.33 19.30 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.33 19.35 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.33 19.40 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.33 19.45 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.33 19.50 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.47 1.32 19.55 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.32 19.60 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.32 19.65 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.32 19.70 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.32 19.75 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.32 19.80 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.32 19.85 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.32 19.90 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.32 19.95 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.46 1.31 20.00 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.45 1.31 20.05 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.45 1.31 20.10 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.45 1.31 20.15 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.45 1.31 20.20 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.45 1.31 20.25 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.45 1.31 20.30 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.45 1.31 20.35 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.45 1.30 20.40 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.44 1.30 20.45 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.44 1.30 20.50 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.44 1.30 20.55 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.44 1.30 20.60 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.44 1.30 20.65 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.44 1.30 20.70 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.44 1.30 20.75 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.44 1.29 20.80 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.43 1.29 20.85 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.43 1.29 20.90 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.43 1.29 Page 8 City Council 18 - 930 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 20.95 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.43 1.29 21.00 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.43 1.29 21.05 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.43 1.29 21.10 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.43 1.29 21.15 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.43 1.28 21.20 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.42 1.28 21.25 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.42 1.28 21.30 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.42 1.28 21.35 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.42 1.28 21.40 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.42 1.28 21.45 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.42 1.28 21.50 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.42 1.27 21.55 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.41 1.27 21.60 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.41 1.27 21.65 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.41 1.27 21.70 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.41 1.27 21.75 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.41 1.27 21.80 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.41 1.26 21.85 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.40 1.26 21.90 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.40 1.26 21.95 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.40 1.26 22.00 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.40 1.26 22.05 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.40 1.26 22.10 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.40 1.26 22.15 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.40 1.25 22.20 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.39 1.25 22.25 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.39 1.25 22.30 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.39 1.25 22.35 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.39 1.25 22.40 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.39 1.25 22.45 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.39 1.24 22.50 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.38 1.24 22.55 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.38 1.24 22.60 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.38 1.24 22.65 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.38 1.24 22.70 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.38 1.24 22.75 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.86 0.38 1.23 22.80 0.28 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.37 1.23 22.85 0.28 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.37 1.23 22.90 0.28 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.37 1.23 22.95 0.28 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.37 1.23 23.00 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.37 1.23 23.05 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.37 1.22 23.10 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.15 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.20 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.25 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.30 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.35 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.40 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.45 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.50 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.22 23.55 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.36 1.21 23.60 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 23.65 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 23.70 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 23.75 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 23.80 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 23.85 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 23.90 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 23.95 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 24.00 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 24.05 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.21 Page 9 City Council 18 - 931 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 24.10 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.35 1.20 24.15 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.20 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.25 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.30 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.35 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.40 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.45 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.50 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.55 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.20 24.60 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.19 24.65 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.34 1.19 24.70 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.19 24.75 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.19 24.80 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.19 24.85 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.19 24.90 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.19 24.95 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.19 25.00 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.19 25.05 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.19 25.10 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.18 25.15 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.33 1.18 25.20 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.18 25.25 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.18 25.30 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.18 25.35 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.18 25.40 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.18 25.45 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.18 25.50 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.18 25.55 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.18 25.60 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.32 1.17 25.65 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.17 25.70 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.17 25.75 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.17 25.80 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.17 25.85 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.17 25.90 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.17 25.95 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.17 26.00 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.17 26.05 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.16 26.10 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.31 1.16 26.15 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.16 26.20 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.16 26.25 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.16 26.30 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.16 26.35 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.16 26.40 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.16 26.45 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.16 26.50 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.16 26.55 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.30 1.15 26.60 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.29 1.15 26.65 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.29 1.15 26.70 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.29 1.15 26.75 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.29 1.15 26.80 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.29 1.15 26.85 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.29 1.15 26.90 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.29 1.15 26.95 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.29 1.14 27.00 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.14 27.05 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.14 27.10 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.14 27.15 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.14 27.20 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.14 Page 10 City Council 18 - 932 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 27.25 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.14 27.30 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.14 27.35 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.14 27.40 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.28 1.13 27.45 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.27 1.13 27.50 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.27 1.13 27.55 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.27 1.13 27.60 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.27 1.13 27.65 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.27 1.13 27.70 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.27 1.13 27.75 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.27 1.13 27.80 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.27 1.12 27.85 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.26 1.12 27.90 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.26 1.12 27.95 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.26 1.12 28.00 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.26 1.12 28.05 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.26 1.12 28.10 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.26 1.12 28.15 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.26 1.12 28.20 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.26 1.11 28.25 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.25 1.11 28.30 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.25 1.11 28.35 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.25 1.11 28.40 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.25 1.11 28.45 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.25 1.11 28.50 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.25 1.11 28.55 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.25 1.11 28.60 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.25 1.10 28.65 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.24 1.10 28.70 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.24 1.10 28.75 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.24 1.10 28.80 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.24 1.10 28.85 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.24 1.10 28.90 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.24 1.10 28.95 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.24 1.09 29.00 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.23 1.09 29.05 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.23 1.09 29.10 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.23 1.09 29.15 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.23 1.09 29.20 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.23 1.09 29.25 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.23 1.09 29.30 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.23 1.08 29.35 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.22 1.08 29.40 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.22 1.08 29.45 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.22 1.08 29.50 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.22 1.08 29.55 0.23 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.22 1.08 29.60 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.22 1.08 29.65 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.21 1.07 29.70 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.21 1.07 29.75 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.21 1.07 29.80 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.21 1.07 29.85 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.21 1.07 29.90 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.21 1.07 29.95 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.20 1.06 30.00 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.20 1.06 30.05 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.20 1.06 30.10 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.20 1.06 30.15 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.20 1.06 30.20 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.20 1.06 30.25 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.19 1.05 30.30 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.19 1.05 30.35 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.19 1.05 Page 11 City Council 18 - 933 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 30.40 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.19 1.05 30.45 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.19 1.05 30.50 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.19 1.04 30.55 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.18 1.04 30.60 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.18 1.04 30.65 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.18 1.04 30.70 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.18 1.04 30.75 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.18 1.04 30.80 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.18 1.03 30.85 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.17 1.03 30.90 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.17 1.03 30.95 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.17 1.03 31.00 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.17 1.03 31.05 0.22 0.36 5.00 0.86 0.17 1.03 31.10 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.17 1.02 31.15 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.16 1.02 31.20 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.16 1.02 31.25 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.16 1.02 31.30 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.16 1.02 31.35 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.16 1.02 31.40 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.16 1.01 31.45 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.15 1.01 31.50 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.15 1.01 31.55 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.15 1.01 31.60 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.15 1.01 31.65 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.15 1.01 31.70 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.15 1.00 31.75 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 31.80 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 31.85 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 31.90 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 31.95 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 32.00 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.14 0.99 32.05 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.13 0.99 32.10 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.13 0.99 32.15 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.13 0.99 32.20 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.13 0.99 32.25 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.13 0.99 32.30 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.13 0.98 32.35 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.12 0.98 32.40 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.12 0.98 32.45 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.12 0.98 32.50 0.22 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.12 0.98 32.55 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.12 0.98 32.60 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.12 0.97 32.65 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.11 0.97 32.70 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.11 0.97 32.75 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.11 0.97 32.80 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.11 0.97 32.85 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.11 0.97 32.90 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.11 0.96 32.95 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.10 0.96 33.00 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.10 0.96 33.05 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.10 0.96 33.10 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.10 0.96 33.15 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.10 0.96 33.20 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.10 0.95 33.25 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.09 0.95 33.30 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.09 0.95 33.35 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.09 0.95 33.40 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.09 0.95 33.45 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.09 0.95 33.50 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.09 0.95 Page 12 City Council 18 - 934 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 33.55 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.09 0.94 33.60 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.08 0.94 33.65 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.08 0.94 33.70 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.08 0.94 33.75 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.08 0.94 33.80 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.08 0.94 33.85 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.08 0.94 33.90 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.08 0.93 33.95 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.07 0.93 34.00 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.07 0.93 34.05 0.26 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.07 0.93 34.10 0.26 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.07 0.93 34.15 0.26 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.07 0.93 34.20 0.26 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.07 0.93 34.25 0.26 0.35 5.00 0.86 0.07 0.92 34.30 0.26 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.06 0.92 34.35 0.26 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.06 0.92 34.40 0.26 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.06 0.92 34.45 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.06 0.92 34.50 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.06 0.92 34.55 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.06 0.92 34.60 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.06 0.92 34.65 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.06 0.91 34.70 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.05 0.91 34.75 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.05 0.91 34.80 0.27 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.05 0.91 34.85 0.28 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.05 0.91 34.90 0.28 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.05 0.91 34.95 0.28 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.05 0.91 35.00 0.28 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.05 0.91 35.05 0.29 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.05 0.90 35.10 0.31 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.15 0.33 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.20 0.36 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.25 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.30 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.35 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.40 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.45 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.50 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.55 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.60 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.90 35.65 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.89 35.70 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.89 35.75 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.04 0.89 35.80 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 35.85 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 35.90 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 35.95 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.00 1.83 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.05 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.10 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.15 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.20 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.25 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.30 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.35 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.40 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.45 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.50 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.55 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.60 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.65 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 Page 13 City Council 18 - 935 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 36.70 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.75 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.80 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.85 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.90 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 36.95 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.89 37.00 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.88 37.05 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.88 37.10 1.82 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.88 37.15 1.81 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.03 0.88 37.20 1.81 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.25 1.81 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.30 1.81 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.35 1.81 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.40 1.81 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.45 1.81 0.34 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.50 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.55 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.60 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.65 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.70 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.75 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.80 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.85 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.90 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 37.95 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.00 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.05 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.10 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.15 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.20 1.81 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.25 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.30 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.35 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.40 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.45 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.88 38.50 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.87 38.55 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.87 38.60 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.87 38.65 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.02 0.87 38.70 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 38.75 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 38.80 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 38.85 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 38.90 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 38.95 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.00 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.05 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.10 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.15 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.20 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.25 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.30 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.35 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.40 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.45 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.50 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.55 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.60 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.65 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.87 39.70 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.86 39.75 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.01 0.86 39.80 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.00 0.86 Page 14 City Council 18 - 936 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 39.85 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.00 0.86 39.90 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.00 0.86 39.95 0.41 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.00 0.86 40.00 0.35 0.33 5.00 0.86 0.00 0.86 40.05 0.35 0.33 1.07 0.86 0.00 0.86 40.10 0.35 0.33 1.07 0.86 0.00 0.86 40.15 0.35 0.33 1.08 0.86 0.00 0.86 40.20 0.36 0.33 1.09 0.86 0.00 0.86 40.25 0.36 0.33 1.10 0.86 0.00 0.86 40.30 0.36 0.33 1.11 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.35 0.37 0.33 1.12 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.40 0.37 0.33 1.13 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.45 0.37 0.33 1.14 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.50 0.38 0.33 1.15 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.55 0.38 0.33 1.17 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.60 0.39 0.33 1.19 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.65 0.40 0.33 1.21 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.70 0.40 0.33 1.23 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.75 0.41 0.33 1.26 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.80 0.43 0.33 1.30 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.85 0.44 0.33 1.35 0.85 0.00 0.85 40.90 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 40.95 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.00 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.05 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.10 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.15 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.20 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.25 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.30 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.35 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.40 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.45 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.50 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.55 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.60 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.65 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.70 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.75 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.80 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.85 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.90 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 41.95 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.00 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.05 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.10 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.15 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.20 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.25 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.30 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.35 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.40 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.45 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.50 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.55 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.60 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.65 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.70 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.75 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.80 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.85 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.90 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 42.95 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 Page 15 City Council 18 - 937 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 43.00 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.05 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.10 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.15 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.20 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.25 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.30 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.35 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.40 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.45 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.50 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.55 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.60 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.65 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.70 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.75 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.80 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.85 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.90 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 43.95 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.00 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.05 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.10 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.15 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.20 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.25 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.30 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.35 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.40 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.45 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.50 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.55 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.60 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.65 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.70 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.75 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.80 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.85 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.90 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 44.95 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.00 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.05 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.10 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.15 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.20 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.25 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.30 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.35 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.40 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.45 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.50 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.55 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.60 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.65 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.70 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.75 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.80 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.85 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.90 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 45.95 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 46.00 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 46.05 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 46.10 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 Page 16 City Council 18 - 938 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 46.15 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 46.20 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.25 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.30 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.35 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.40 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.45 1.74 0.34 5.00 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.50 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.55 0.41 0.34 1.24 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.60 0.39 0.34 1.17 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.65 0.38 0.34 1.13 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.70 0.37 0.34 1.10 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.75 0.36 0.34 1.07 0.83 0.00 0.83 46.80 0.35 0.34 1.05 0.82 0.00 0.82 46.85 0.35 0.34 1.03 0.82 0.00 0.82 46.90 0.34 0.34 1.02 0.82 0.00 0.82 46.95 0.34 0.34 1.00 0.82 0.00 0.82 47.00 0.33 0.34 0.99* 0.82 0.00 0.82 47.05 0.33 0.34 0.98* 0.82 0.00 0.82 47.10 0.33 0.34 0.97* 0.82 0.00 0.82 47.15 0.32 0.34 0.96* 0.82 0.00 0.82 47.20 0.32 0.34 0.95* 0.82 0.00 0.82 47.25 0.32 0.34 0.94* 0.82 0.00 0.82 47.30 0.31 0.34 0.93* 0.81 0.00 0.81 47.35 0.31 0.34 0.92* 0.81 0.00 0.81 47.40 0.31 0.34 0.91* 0.81 0.00 0.81 47.45 0.31 0.34 0.91* 0.81 0.00 0.81 47.50 0.30 0.34 0.90* 0.81 0.00 0.81 47.55 0.30 0.34 0.88* 0.81 0.00 0.81 47.60 0.29 0.34 0.86* 0.80 0.00 0.80 47.65 0.28 0.34 0.84* 0.80 0.00 0.80 47.70 0.28 0.34 0.82* 0.80 0.00 0.80 47.75 0.27 0.34 0.80* 0.79 0.00 0.79 47.80 0.26 0.34 0.79* 0.79 0.00 0.79 47.85 0.26 0.34 0.77* 0.78 0.00 0.78 47.90 0.25 0.34 0.76* 0.78 0.00 0.78 47.95 0.25 0.34 0.74* 0.77 0.00 0.77 48.00 0.25 0.34 0.73* 0.76 0.00 0.76 48.05 0.24 0.34 0.72* 0.76 0.00 0.76 48.10 0.24 0.34 0.70* 0.75 0.00 0.75 48.15 0.23 0.34 0.69* 0.74 0.00 0.74 48.20 0.23 0.34 0.68* 0.74 0.00 0.74 48.25 0.22 0.34 0.67* 0.73 0.00 0.73 48.30 0.22 0.34 0.66* 0.72 0.00 0.72 48.35 0.22 0.34 0.64* 0.72 0.00 0.72 48.40 0.21 0.34 0.63* 0.71 0.00 0.71 48.45 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.70 0.00 0.70 48.50 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.69 0.00 0.69 48.55 0.20 0.34 0.60* 0.69 0.00 0.69 48.60 0.20 0.34 0.59* 0.68 0.00 0.68 48.65 0.20 0.34 0.58* 0.67 0.00 0.67 48.70 0.19 0.34 0.57* 0.66 0.00 0.66 48.75 0.19 0.34 0.56* 0.65 0.00 0.65 48.80 0.19 0.34 0.56* 0.65 0.00 0.65 48.85 0.18 0.34 0.55* 0.64 0.00 0.64 48.90 0.18 0.34 0.54* 0.63 0.00 0.63 48.95 0.18 0.34 0.53* 0.62 0.00 0.62 49.00 0.18 0.34 0.52* 0.61 0.00 0.61 49.05 0.17 0.34 0.51* 0.60 0.00 0.60 49.10 0.17 0.34 0.50* 0.59 0.00 0.59 49.15 0.17 0.34 0.49* 0.58 0.00 0.58 49.20 0.16 0.34 0.49* 0.57 0.00 0.57 49.25 0.16 0.34 0.48* 0.56 0.00 0.56 Page 17 City Council 18 - 939 10/3/2023 B-LGC-2.sum 49.30 0.16 0.34 0.47* 0.55 0.00 0.55 49.35 0.16 0.34 0.46* 0.54 0.00 0.54 49.40 0.15 0.34 0.45* 0.53 0.00 0.53 49.45 0.15 0.34 0.44* 0.52 0.00 0.52 49.50 0.15 0.34 0.44* 0.51 0.00 0.51 49.55 0.14 0.34 0.43* 0.50 0.00 0.50 49.60 0.14 0.34 0.42* 0.49 0.00 0.49 49.65 0.14 0.34 0.41* 0.48 0.00 0.48 49.70 0.14 0.34 0.40* 0.46 0.00 0.46 49.75 0.13 0.34 0.39* 0.45 0.00 0.45 49.80 0.13 0.34 0.39* 0.44 0.00 0.44 49.85 0.13 0.34 0.38* 0.43 0.00 0.43 49.90 0.12 0.34 0.37* 0.42 0.00 0.42 49.95 0.12 0.34 0.36* 0.40 0.00 0.40 50.00 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.39 0.00 0.39 50.05 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.38 0.00 0.38 50.10 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.37 0.00 0.37 50.15 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.35 0.00 0.35 50.20 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.34 0.00 0.34 50.25 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.33 0.00 0.33 50.30 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.31 0.00 0.31 50.35 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.30 0.00 0.30 50.40 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.29 0.00 0.29 50.45 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.27 0.00 0.27 50.50 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.26 0.00 0.26 50.55 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.25 0.00 0.25 50.60 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.24 0.00 0.24 50.65 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.22 0.00 0.22 50.70 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.21 0.00 0.21 50.75 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.20 0.00 0.20 50.80 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.18 0.00 0.18 50.85 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.17 0.00 0.17 50.90 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.16 0.00 0.16 50.95 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.14 0.00 0.14 51.00 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.13 0.00 0.13 51.05 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.12 0.00 0.12 51.10 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.10 0.00 0.10 51.15 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.09 0.00 0.09 51.20 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.08 0.00 0.08 51.25 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.07 0.00 0.07 51.30 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.05 0.00 0.05 51.35 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.04 0.00 0.04 51.40 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.03 0.00 0.03 51.45 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.01 0.00 0.01 51.50 0.12 0.34 0.35* 0.00 0.00 0.00 * F.S.<1, Liquefaction Potential zone (F.S. is limited to 5, CRR is limited to 2, CSR is limited to 2) Units Depth = ft, Stress or Pressure = tsf (atm), Unit weight = pcf, settlement = in. CRRm Cyclic resistance ratio from soils CSRfs Cyclic stress ratio induced by a given earthquake (with user request factor of safety) F.S. Factor of safety against liquefaction, F.S.=CRRm/CSRfs S_sat Settlement from saturated sands S_dry settlement from dry sands Sall Total settlement from saturated and dry sands NoLiq No -Liquefy soils Page 18 City Council 18 - 940 10/3/2023 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS FF/Santa Ana Hole No.=B-LGC-3 Water Depth=40 ft Surface Elev.=148 Shear Stress Ratio Factor of Safety Settlement 0 1 0 1 5 0 (in.) 10 (ft)0 10 20 30 40 50 Shaded Zone has Liquefaction Potential 60 70 CivilTech Corporation Wet Dry— S=2.79 in. 213031-01 Magnitude=7.71 Acceleration=0.593g Soil Description Plate A-1 City Council 18-941 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS CALCULATION SHEET Copyright by CivilTech Software www.civiltech.com (425) 453-6488 Fax (425) 453-5848 Licensed to , 12/16/2021 9:21:43 AM Input File Name: \\DC1\Public2\FINAL PROJECTS\FAIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT\Santa Ana\Liquefaction\B-LGC-3.liq Title: FF/Santa Ana subtitle: 213031-01 surface Elev.=148 Hole No.=B-LGC-3 Depth of Hole= 51.5 ft water Table during Earthquake= 40.0 ft water Table during In -Situ Testing= 51.5 ft Max. Acceleration= 0.59 g Earthquake Magnitude= 7.7 Input Data: Surface Elev.=148 Hole No.=B-LGC-3 Depth of Hole=51.5 ft water Table during Earthquake= 40.0 ft water Table during In -situ Testing= 51.5 ft Max. Acceleration=0.59 g Earthquake Magnitude=7.7 Earthquake Magnitude=7.7 2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu / Seed 3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Idriss/seed (SPT only) 4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction' 5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones* 6. Hammer Energy Ratio, Ce = 1.3 7. Borehole Diameter, Cb= 1 8. Sampling Method, Cs= 1 9. user request factor of safety (apply to CSR) user= 1.0 Plot one CSR curve (fsl=User) 10. use Curve Smoothing: Yes* .: Recommended Options In -Situ Test Data: Depth SPT gamma Fines ft pcf 0.0 0.0 102.0 NoLiq 5.0 4.7 102.0 70.6 7.5 12.0 102.0 32.4 10.0 11.4 102.0 5.0 12.5 4.7 102.0 70.6 15.0 6.7 102.0 70.6 17.5 5.0 102.0 70.6 20.0 8.7 102.0 70.6 22.5 15.0 102.0 70.6 25.0 26.0 102.0 32.4 Page 1 City Council 18 - 942 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 27.5 27.0 102.0 32.4 30.0 14.7 102.0 70.6 32.5 16.0 102.0 70.6 35.0 15.0 102.0 72.9 37.5 12.0 102.0 72.9 40.0 67.0 102.0 5.0 42.5 49.0 102.0 5.0 45.0 63.0 102.0 5.0 47.5 22.0 102.0 52.8 50.0 18.0 102.0 70.6 51.5 18.0 102.0 70.6 Output Results: settlement of saturated sands=0.54 in. Settlement of dry sands=2.25 in. Total settlement of saturated and dry sands=2.79 in. Differential Settlement=1.397 to 1.844 in. Depth CRRm CSRfs F.S. S_sat. S_dry Sall ft in. in. in. 0.00 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.05 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.10 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.15 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.20 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.25 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.30 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.35 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.40 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.45 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.50 2.00 0.39 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 0.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 1.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 Page 2 City Council 18 - 943 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 2.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 2.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 3.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.00 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.05 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.10 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.15 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.20 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.25 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.30 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.35 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.40 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.45 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.50 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.55 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.60 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.65 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.70 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.75 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.80 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.85 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.90 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 4.95 2.00 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 5.00 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 5.05 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 5.10 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.25 2.79 5.15 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.24 2.79 Page 3 City Council 18 - 944 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 5.20 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.24 2.79 5.25 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.24 2.79 5.30 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.24 2.79 5.35 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.24 2.78 5.40 0.14 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.24 2.78 5.45 0.14 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.24 2.78 5.50 0.14 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.24 2.78 5.55 0.14 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.78 5.60 0.15 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.78 5.65 0.15 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.78 5.70 0.15 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.78 5.75 0.15 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.77 5.80 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.77 5.85 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.77 5.90 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.77 5.95 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.77 6.00 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.23 2.77 6.05 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.77 6.10 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.77 6.15 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.77 6.20 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.77 6.25 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.77 6.30 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.77 6.35 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.76 6.40 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.76 6.45 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.76 6.50 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.76 6.55 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.76 6.60 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.22 2.76 6.65 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.76 6.70 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.76 6.75 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.76 6.80 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.76 6.85 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.76 6.90 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.76 6.95 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.76 7.00 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.76 7.05 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.75 7.10 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.75 7.15 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.75 7.20 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.75 7.25 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.75 7.30 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.75 7.35 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.75 7.40 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.21 2.75 7.45 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.75 7.50 0.23 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.75 7.55 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.75 7.60 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.75 7.65 0.22 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.75 7.70 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.75 7.75 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.75 7.80 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.75 7.85 0.21 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.74 7.90 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.74 7.95 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.74 8.00 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.74 8.05 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.20 2.74 8.10 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.74 8.15 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.74 8.20 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.74 8.25 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.74 8.30 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.74 Page 4 City Council 18 - 945 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 8.35 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.73 8.40 0.20 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.73 8.45 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.73 8.50 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.19 2.73 8.55 0.19 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.18 2.73 8.60 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.18 2.73 8.65 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.18 2.73 8.70 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.18 2.73 8.75 0.18 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.18 2.72 8.80 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.18 2.72 8.85 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.17 2.72 8.90 0.17 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.17 2.72 8.95 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.17 2.71 9.00 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.17 2.71 9.05 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.16 2.71 9.10 0.16 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.16 2.71 9.15 0.15 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.16 2.70 9.20 0.15 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.15 2.70 9.25 0.15 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.15 2.69 9.30 0.14 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.14 2.69 9.35 0.14 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.13 2.68 9.40 0.14 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.13 2.67 9.45 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.12 2.66 9.50 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.11 2.65 9.55 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.09 2.64 9.60 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.07 2.62 9.65 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.05 2.60 9.70 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.03 2.57 9.75 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 2.00 2.55 9.80 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.97 2.52 9.85 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.95 2.49 9.90 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.92 2.46 9.95 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.89 2.43 10.00 0.10 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.86 2.40 10.05 0.10 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.83 2.37 10.10 0.10 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.80 2.34 10.15 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.77 2.31 10.20 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.74 2.29 10.25 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.71 2.26 10.30 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.68 2.23 10.35 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.66 2.20 10.40 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.63 2.18 10.45 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.61 2.15 10.50 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.58 2.13 10.55 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.56 2.10 10.60 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.54 2.08 10.65 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.53 2.08 10.70 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.53 2.08 10.75 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.53 2.07 10.80 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.53 2.07 10.85 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.52 2.07 10.90 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.52 2.06 10.95 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.52 2.06 11.00 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.51 2.06 11.05 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.51 2.06 11.10 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.51 2.05 11.15 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.51 2.05 11.20 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.50 2.05 11.25 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.50 2.04 11.30 0.13 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.50 2.04 11.35 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.49 2.04 11.40 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.49 2.03 11.45 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.49 2.03 Page 5 City Council 18 - 946 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 11.50 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.48 2.03 11.55 0.12 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.48 2.02 11.60 0.11 0.38 5.00 0.54 1.47 2.02 11.65 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.47 2.01 11.70 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.46 2.01 11.75 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.46 2.00 11.80 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.45 2.00 11.85 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.45 1.99 11.90 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.44 1.99 11.95 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.44 1.98 12.00 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.43 1.98 12.05 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.42 1.97 12.10 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.42 1.96 12.15 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.41 1.95 12.20 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.40 1.95 12.25 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.39 1.94 12.30 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.38 1.93 12.35 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.37 1.92 12.40 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.36 1.91 12.45 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.35 1.90 12.50 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.34 1.89 12.55 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.33 1.88 12.60 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.32 1.86 12.65 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.31 1.85 12.70 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.30 1.84 12.75 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.29 1.83 12.80 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.28 1.82 12.85 0.09 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.27 1.81 12.90 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.26 1.80 12.95 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.25 1.79 13.00 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.24 1.79 13.05 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.23 1.78 13.10 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.22 1.77 13.15 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.22 1.76 13.20 0.10 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.21 1.75 13.25 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.20 1.75 13.30 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.19 1.74 13.35 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.19 1.73 13.40 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.18 1.72 13.45 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.17 1.72 13.50 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.17 1.71 13.55 0.11 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.16 1.70 13.60 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.15 1.70 13.65 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.15 1.69 13.70 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.14 1.69 13.75 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.14 1.68 13.80 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.13 1.67 13.85 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.12 1.67 13.90 0.12 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.12 1.66 13.95 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.11 1.66 14.00 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.11 1.65 14.05 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.10 1.65 14.10 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.10 1.64 14.15 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.09 1.64 14.20 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.09 1.63 14.25 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.08 1.63 14.30 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.08 1.63 14.35 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.08 1.62 14.40 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.07 1.62 14.45 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.07 1.61 14.50 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.06 1.61 14.55 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.06 1.60 14.60 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.06 1.60 Page 6 City Council 18 - 947 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 14.65 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.05 1.60 14.70 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.05 1.59 14.75 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.04 1.59 14.80 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.04 1.58 14.85 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.04 1.58 14.90 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.03 1.58 14.95 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.03 1.58 15.00 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.03 1.57 15.05 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.03 1.57 15.10 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.02 1.57 15.15 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.02 1.56 15.20 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.02 1.56 15.25 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.01 1.56 15.30 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.01 1.56 15.35 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.01 1.55 15.40 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.00 1.55 15.45 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.00 1.55 15.50 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 1.00 1.54 15.55 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.99 1.54 15.60 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.99 1.54 15.65 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.99 1.53 15.70 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.98 1.53 15.75 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.98 1.52 15.80 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.98 1.52 15.85 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.97 1.52 15.90 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.97 1.51 15.95 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.96 1.51 16.00 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.96 1.50 16.05 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.96 1.50 16.10 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.95 1.50 16.15 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.95 1.49 16.20 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.94 1.49 16.25 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.94 1.48 16.30 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.93 1.48 16.35 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.93 1.47 16.40 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.92 1.47 16.45 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.92 1.46 16.50 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.91 1.46 16.55 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.91 1.45 16.60 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.90 1.45 16.65 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.90 1.44 16.70 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.89 1.44 16.75 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.89 1.43 16.80 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.88 1.43 16.85 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.88 1.42 16.90 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.87 1.42 16.95 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.86 1.41 17.00 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.86 1.40 17.05 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.85 1.40 17.10 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.85 1.39 17.15 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.84 1.38 17.20 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.83 1.38 17.25 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.83 1.37 17.30 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.82 1.36 17.35 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.81 1.36 17.40 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.80 1.35 17.45 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.80 1.34 17.50 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.79 1.33 17.55 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.78 1.33 17.60 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.77 1.32 17.65 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.77 1.31 17.70 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.76 1.30 17.75 0.13 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.75 1.30 Page 7 City Council 18 - 948 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 17.80 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.75 1.29 17.85 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.74 1.28 17.90 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.73 1.28 17.95 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.72 1.27 18.00 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.72 1.26 18.05 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.71 1.26 18.10 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.71 1.25 18.15 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.70 1.24 18.20 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.69 1.24 18.25 0.14 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.69 1.23 18.30 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.68 1.23 18.35 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.67 1.22 18.40 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.67 1.21 18.45 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.66 1.21 18.50 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.66 1.20 18.55 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.65 1.20 18.60 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.65 1.19 18.65 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.64 1.18 18.70 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.63 1.18 18.75 0.15 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.63 1.17 18.80 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.62 1.17 18.85 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.62 1.16 18.90 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.61 1.16 18.95 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.61 1.15 19.00 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.60 1.15 19.05 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.60 1.14 19.10 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.59 1.14 19.15 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.59 1.13 19.20 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.58 1.13 19.25 0.16 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.58 1.12 19.30 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.57 1.12 19.35 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.57 1.11 19.40 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.56 1.11 19.45 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.56 1.11 19.50 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.56 1.10 19.55 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.55 1.10 19.60 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.55 1.09 19.65 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.54 1.09 19.70 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.54 1.08 19.75 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.53 1.08 19.80 0.17 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.53 1.07 19.85 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.53 1.07 19.90 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.52 1.07 19.95 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.52 1.06 20.00 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.51 1.06 20.05 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.51 1.05 20.10 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.50 1.05 20.15 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.50 1.05 20.20 0.18 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.50 1.04 20.25 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.49 1.04 20.30 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.49 1.03 20.35 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.49 1.03 20.40 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.48 1.03 20.45 0.19 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.48 1.02 20.50 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.48 1.02 20.55 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.47 1.02 20.60 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.47 1.01 20.65 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.47 1.01 20.70 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.46 1.01 20.75 0.20 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.46 1.01 20.80 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.46 1.00 20.85 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.45 1.00 20.90 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.45 1.00 Page 8 City Council 18 - 949 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 20.95 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.45 0.99 21.00 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.45 0.99 21.05 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.44 0.99 21.10 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.44 0.99 21.15 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.44 0.98 21.20 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.44 0.98 21.25 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.43 0.98 21.30 0.22 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.43 0.98 21.35 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.43 0.97 21.40 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.43 0.97 21.45 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.42 0.97 21.50 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.42 0.97 21.55 0.23 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.42 0.96 21.60 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.42 0.96 21.65 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.41 0.96 21.70 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.41 0.96 21.75 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.41 0.95 21.80 0.24 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.41 0.95 21.85 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.41 0.95 21.90 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.40 0.95 21.95 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.40 0.95 22.00 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.40 0.94 22.05 0.25 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.40 0.94 22.10 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.39 0.94 22.15 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.39 0.94 22.20 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.39 0.94 22.25 0.26 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.39 0.93 22.30 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.39 0.93 22.35 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.39 0.93 22.40 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.38 0.93 22.45 0.27 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.38 0.93 22.50 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.38 0.92 22.55 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.38 0.92 22.60 0.28 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.38 0.92 22.65 0.29 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.92 22.70 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.92 22.75 0.30 0.37 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.92 22.80 0.31 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.92 22.85 0.31 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.92 22.90 0.32 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.92 22.95 0.33 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.91 23.00 0.33 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.91 23.05 0.34 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.91 23.10 0.35 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.91 23.15 0.36 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.91 23.20 0.38 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.91 23.25 0.41 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.91 23.30 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.37 0.91 23.35 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.40 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.45 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.50 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.55 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.60 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.65 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.70 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.75 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.91 23.80 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 23.85 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 23.90 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 23.95 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 24.00 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 24.05 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 Page 9 City Council 18 - 950 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 24.10 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 24.15 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 24.20 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 24.25 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.36 0.90 24.30 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.35 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.40 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.45 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.50 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.55 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.60 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.65 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.70 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.75 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.80 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.85 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.90 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.90 24.95 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.00 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.05 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.10 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.15 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.20 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.25 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.30 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.35 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.40 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.45 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.50 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.55 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.60 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.35 0.89 25.65 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 25.70 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 25.75 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 25.80 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 25.85 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 25.90 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 25.95 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 26.00 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 26.05 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 26.10 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 26.15 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 26.20 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 26.25 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.89 26.30 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.35 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.40 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.45 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.50 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.55 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.60 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.65 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.70 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.75 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.80 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.85 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.90 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 26.95 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.34 0.88 27.00 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.05 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.10 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.15 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.20 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 Page 10 City Council 18 - 951 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 27.25 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.30 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.35 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.40 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.45 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.50 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.55 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.88 27.60 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 27.65 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 27.70 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 27.75 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 27.80 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 27.85 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 27.90 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 27.95 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 28.00 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 28.05 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 28.10 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 28.15 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.33 0.87 28.20 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.25 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.30 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.35 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.40 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.45 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.50 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.55 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.60 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.87 28.65 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.86 28.70 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.86 28.75 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.86 28.80 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.86 28.85 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.86 28.90 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.86 28.95 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.32 0.86 29.00 1.86 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.86 29.05 0.40 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.86 29.10 0.37 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.86 29.15 0.35 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.86 29.20 0.34 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.86 29.25 0.33 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.86 29.30 0.32 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.85 29.35 0.31 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.85 29.40 0.31 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.85 29.45 0.30 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.85 29.50 0.29 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.31 0.85 29.55 0.29 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.85 29.60 0.28 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.85 29.65 0.28 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.85 29.70 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.85 29.75 0.27 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.85 29.80 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.84 29.85 0.26 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.84 29.90 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.84 29.95 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.30 0.84 30.00 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.29 0.84 30.05 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.29 0.84 30.10 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.29 0.84 30.15 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.29 0.83 30.20 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.29 0.83 30.25 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.29 0.83 30.30 0.24 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.28 0.83 30.35 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.28 0.83 Page 11 City Council 18 - 952 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 30.40 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.28 0.83 30.45 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.28 0.83 30.50 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.28 0.82 30.55 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.28 0.82 30.60 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.28 0.82 30.65 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.27 0.82 30.70 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.27 0.82 30.75 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.27 0.82 30.80 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.27 0.82 30.85 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.27 0.81 30.90 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.27 0.81 30.95 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.27 0.81 31.00 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.26 0.81 31.05 0.25 0.36 5.00 0.54 0.26 0.81 31.10 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.26 0.81 31.15 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.26 0.81 31.20 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.26 0.80 31.25 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.26 0.80 31.30 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.26 0.80 31.35 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.25 0.80 31.40 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.25 0.80 31.45 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.25 0.80 31.50 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.25 0.80 31.55 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.25 0.79 31.60 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.25 0.79 31.65 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.25 0.79 31.70 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.25 0.79 31.75 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.24 0.79 31.80 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.24 0.79 31.85 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.24 0.79 31.90 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.24 0.78 31.95 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.24 0.78 32.00 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.24 0.78 32.05 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.24 0.78 32.10 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.23 0.78 32.15 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.23 0.78 32.20 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.23 0.78 32.25 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.23 0.77 32.30 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.23 0.77 32.35 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.23 0.77 32.40 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.23 0.77 32.45 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.22 0.77 32.50 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.22 0.77 32.55 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.22 0.77 32.60 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.22 0.76 32.65 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.22 0.76 32.70 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.22 0.76 32.75 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.22 0.76 32.80 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.21 0.76 32.85 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.21 0.76 32.90 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.21 0.76 32.95 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.21 0.75 33.00 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.21 0.75 33.05 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.21 0.75 33.10 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.21 0.75 33.15 0.25 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.20 0.75 33.20 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.20 0.75 33.25 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.20 0.75 33.30 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.20 0.74 33.35 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.20 0.74 33.40 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.20 0.74 33.45 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.19 0.74 33.50 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.19 0.74 Page 12 City Council 18 - 953 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 33.55 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.19 0.74 33.60 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.19 0.74 33.65 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.19 0.73 33.70 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.19 0.73 33.75 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.19 0.73 33.80 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.18 0.73 33.85 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.18 0.73 33.90 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.18 0.73 33.95 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.18 0.72 34.00 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.18 0.72 34.05 0.24 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.18 0.72 34.10 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.17 0.72 34.15 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.17 0.72 34.20 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.17 0.72 34.25 0.23 0.35 5.00 0.54 0.17 0.71 34.30 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.17 0.71 34.35 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.17 0.71 34.40 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.16 0.71 34.45 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.16 0.71 34.50 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.16 0.71 34.55 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.16 0.70 34.60 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.16 0.70 34.65 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.16 0.70 34.70 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.15 0.70 34.75 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.15 0.70 34.80 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.15 0.70 34.85 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.15 0.69 34.90 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.15 0.69 34.95 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.15 0.69 35.00 0.23 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.14 0.69 35.05 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.14 0.69 35.10 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.14 0.69 35.15 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.14 0.68 35.20 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.14 0.68 35.25 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.14 0.68 35.30 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.13 0.68 35.35 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.13 0.68 35.40 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.13 0.67 35.45 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.13 0.67 35.50 0.22 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.13 0.67 35.55 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.12 0.67 35.60 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.12 0.67 35.65 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.12 0.67 35.70 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.12 0.66 35.75 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.12 0.66 35.80 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.11 0.66 35.85 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.11 0.66 35.90 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.11 0.66 35.95 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.11 0.65 36.00 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.11 0.65 36.05 0.21 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.10 0.65 36.10 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.10 0.65 36.15 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.10 0.64 36.20 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.10 0.64 36.25 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.10 0.64 36.30 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.09 0.64 36.35 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.09 0.64 36.40 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.09 0.63 36.45 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.09 0.63 36.50 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.08 0.63 36.55 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.08 0.63 36.60 0.20 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.08 0.62 36.65 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.08 0.62 Page 13 City Council 18 - 954 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 36.70 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.07 0.62 36.75 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.07 0.62 36.80 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.07 0.61 36.85 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.07 0.61 36.90 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.06 0.61 36.95 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.06 0.61 37.00 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.06 0.60 37.05 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.06 0.60 37.10 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.05 0.60 37.15 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.05 0.60 37.20 0.19 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.05 0.59 37.25 0.18 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.05 0.59 37.30 0.18 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.04 0.59 37.35 0.18 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.04 0.59 37.40 0.18 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.04 0.58 37.45 0.18 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.04 0.58 37.50 0.18 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.03 0.58 37.55 0.19 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.03 0.57 37.60 0.21 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.03 0.57 37.65 0.22 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.03 0.57 37.70 0.23 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.02 0.57 37.75 0.25 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.02 0.57 37.80 0.27 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.02 0.57 37.85 0.29 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.02 0.56 37.90 0.32 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.02 0.56 37.95 0.36 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.02 0.56 38.00 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.02 0.56 38.05 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.10 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.15 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.20 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.25 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.30 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.35 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.40 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.45 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.56 38.50 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.55 1.80 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.60 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.65 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.70 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.75 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.80 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.85 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.90 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 38.95 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 39.00 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 39.05 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 39.10 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 39.15 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 39.20 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.01 0.55 39.25 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.30 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.35 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.40 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.45 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.50 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.55 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.60 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.65 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.70 1.79 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.75 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.80 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 Page 14 City Council 18 - 955 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 39.85 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.90 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 39.95 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 40.00 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.55 40.05 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.10 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.15 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.20 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.25 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.30 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.35 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.40 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.45 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.50 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.55 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.60 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.65 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.70 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.75 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.80 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.85 1.78 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.90 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 40.95 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.00 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.05 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.10 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.15 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.20 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.25 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.30 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.35 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.40 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.45 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.50 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.55 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.60 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.65 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.70 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.75 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.80 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.85 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.90 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 41.95 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.00 1.77 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.05 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.10 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.15 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.20 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.25 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.30 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.35 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.40 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.45 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.50 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.55 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.60 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.65 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.70 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.75 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.80 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.85 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.90 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 42.95 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 Page 15 City Council 18 - 956 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 43.00 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.05 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.10 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.15 1.76 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.20 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.25 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.30 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.35 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.40 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.45 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.50 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.55 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.60 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.65 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.70 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.75 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.80 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.85 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.90 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 43.95 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.00 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.05 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.10 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.15 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.20 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.25 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.30 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.35 1.75 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.40 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.45 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.50 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.55 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.60 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.65 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.70 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.75 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.80 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.85 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.90 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 44.95 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.00 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.05 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.10 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.15 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.20 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.25 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.30 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.35 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.40 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.45 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.50 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.55 1.74 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.60 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.65 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.70 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.75 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.80 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.85 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.90 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 45.95 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.00 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.05 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.10 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 Page 16 City Council 18 - 957 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 46.15 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.20 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.25 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.30 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.35 1.73 0.33 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.40 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.45 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.50 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.55 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.60 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.65 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.70 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.75 1.73 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.80 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.85 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.90 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 46.95 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.00 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.05 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.10 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.15 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.20 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.25 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.30 1.72 0.34 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.35 0.35 0.34 1.04 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.40 0.31 0.34 0.93* 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.45 0.29 0.34 0.87* 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.50 0.28 0.34 0.82* 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.55 0.27 0.34 0.82* 0.54 0.00 0.54 47.60 0.27 0.34 0.81* 0.53 0.00 0.53 47.65 0.27 0.34 0.81* 0.53 0.00 0.53 47.70 0.27 0.34 0.80* 0.52 0.00 0.52 47.75 0.27 0.34 0.80* 0.52 0.00 0.52 47.80 0.27 0.34 0.79* 0.51 0.00 0.51 47.85 0.26 0.34 0.79* 0.51 0.00 0.51 47.90 0.26 0.34 0.78* 0.50 0.00 0.50 47.95 0.26 0.34 0.78* 0.50 0.00 0.50 48.00 0.26 0.34 0.77* 0.49 0.00 0.49 48.05 0.26 0.34 0.77* 0.49 0.00 0.49 48.10 0.26 0.34 0.76* 0.48 0.00 0.48 48.15 0.25 0.34 0.76* 0.48 0.00 0.48 48.20 0.25 0.34 0.75* 0.47 0.00 0.47 48.25 0.25 0.34 0.75* 0.46 0.00 0.46 48.30 0.25 0.34 0.75* 0.46 0.00 0.46 48.35 0.25 0.34 0.74* 0.45 0.00 0.45 48.40 0.25 0.34 0.74* 0.45 0.00 0.45 48.45 0.25 0.34 0.73* 0.44 0.00 0.44 48.50 0.25 0.34 0.73* 0.43 0.00 0.43 48.55 0.24 0.34 0.73* 0.43 0.00 0.43 48.60 0.24 0.34 0.72* 0.42 0.00 0.42 48.65 0.24 0.34 0.72* 0.41 0.00 0.41 48.70 0.24 0.34 0.71* 0.41 0.00 0.41 48.75 0.24 0.34 0.71* 0.40 0.00 0.40 48.80 0.24 0.34 0.71* 0.39 0.00 0.39 48.85 0.24 0.34 0.70* 0.39 0.00 0.39 48.90 0.23 0.34 0.70* 0.38 0.00 0.38 48.95 0.23 0.34 0.69* 0.37 0.00 0.37 49.00 0.23 0.34 0.69* 0.37 0.00 0.37 49.05 0.23 0.34 0.69* 0.36 0.00 0.36 49.10 0.23 0.34 0.68* 0.35 0.00 0.35 49.15 0.23 0.34 0.68* 0.35 0.00 0.35 49.20 0.23 0.34 0.68* 0.34 0.00 0.34 49.25 0.23 0.34 0.67* 0.33 0.00 0.33 Page 17 City Council 18 - 958 10/3/2023 B-LGC-3.sum 49.30 0.23 0.34 0.67* 0.33 0.00 0.33 49.35 0.22 0.34 0.67* 0.32 0.00 0.32 49.40 0.22 0.34 0.66* 0.31 0.00 0.31 49.45 0.22 0.34 0.66* 0.31 0.00 0.31 49.50 0.22 0.34 0.66* 0.30 0.00 0.30 49.55 0.22 0.34 0.65* 0.29 0.00 0.29 49.60 0.22 0.34 0.65* 0.29 0.00 0.29 49.65 0.22 0.34 0.65* 0.28 0.00 0.28 49.70 0.22 0.34 0.64* 0.27 0.00 0.27 49.75 0.22 0.34 0.64* 0.26 0.00 0.26 49.80 0.21 0.34 0.64* 0.26 0.00 0.26 49.85 0.21 0.34 0.63* 0.25 0.00 0.25 49.90 0.21 0.34 0.63* 0.24 0.00 0.24 49.95 0.21 0.34 0.63* 0.23 0.00 0.23 50.00 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.23 0.00 0.23 50.05 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.22 0.00 0.22 50.10 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.21 0.00 0.21 50.15 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.20 0.00 0.20 50.20 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.20 0.00 0.20 50.25 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.19 0.00 0.19 50.30 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.18 0.00 0.18 50.35 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.17 0.00 0.17 50.40 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.17 0.00 0.17 50.45 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.16 0.00 0.16 50.50 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.15 0.00 0.15 50.55 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.14 0.00 0.14 50.60 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.14 0.00 0.14 50.65 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.13 0.00 0.13 50.70 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.12 0.00 0.12 50.75 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.11 0.00 0.11 50.80 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.11 0.00 0.11 50.85 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.10 0.00 0.10 50.90 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.09 0.00 0.09 50.95 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.08 0.00 0.08 51.00 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.08 0.00 0.08 51.05 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.07 0.00 0.07 51.10 0.21 0.34 0.62* 0.06 0.00 0.06 51.15 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.05 0.00 0.05 51.20 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.05 0.00 0.05 51.25 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.04 0.00 0.04 51.30 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.03 0.00 0.03 51.35 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.02 0.00 0.02 51.40 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.02 0.00 0.02 51.45 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.01 0.00 0.01 51.50 0.21 0.34 0.61* 0.00 0.00 0.00 * F.S.<1, Liquefaction Potential zone (F.S. is limited to 5, CRR is limited to 2, CSR is limited to 2) Units Depth = ft, Stress or Pressure = tsf (atm), Unit weight = pcf, settlement = in. CRRm Cyclic resistance ratio from soils CSRfs Cyclic stress ratio induced by a given earthquake (with user request factor of safety) F.S. Factor of safety against liquefaction, F.S.=CRRm/CSRfs S_sat Settlement from saturated sands S_dry settlement from dry sands Sall Total settlement from saturated and dry sands NoLiq No -Liquefy soils Page 18 City Council 18 - 959 10/3/2023 APPENDIX E LGC VALLEY, INC. General Earthwork and Gradinz Specifications For Rou,-h Grading 1.0 General 1.1 Intent: These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications are for the grading and earthwork shown on the approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the geotechnical report(s). These Specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s). In case of conflict, the specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these more general Specifications. Observations of the earthwork by the project Geotechnical Consultant during the course of grading may result in new or revised recommendations that could supersede these specifications or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). 1.2 The Geotechnical Consultant of Record: Prior to commencement of work, the owner shall employ a qualified Geotechnical Consultant of Record (Geotechnical Consultant). The Geotechnical Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing the approved geotechnical report(s) and accepting the adequacy of the preliminary geotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations prior to the commencement of the grading. Prior to commencement of grading, the Geotechnical Consultant shall review the "work plan" prepared by the Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) and schedule sufficient personnel to perform the appropriate level of observation, mapping, and compaction testing. During the grading and earthwork operations, the Geotechnical Consultant shall observe, map, and document the subsurface exposures to verify the geotechnical design assumptions. If the observed conditions are found to be significantly different than the interpreted assumptions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall inform the owner, recommend appropriate changes in design to accommodate the observed conditions, and notify the review agency where required. The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the moisture -conditioning and processing of the subgrade and fill materials and perform relative compaction testing of fill to confirm that the attained level of compaction is being accomplished as specified. The Geotechnical Consultant shall provide the test results to the owner and the Contractor on a routine and frequent basis. LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Pag i Council 18 — 960 10/3/2023 1.3 The Earthwork Contractor: The Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture -conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the project plans and specifications. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "equipment" of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate personnel will be available for observation and testing.. The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, improper moisture condition, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. It is the contractor's sole responsibility to provide proper fill compaction. 2.0 Preparation ofAreas to be Filled 2.1 Clearing and Grubbing: Vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lift shall contain more than 10 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Pag i Council 18 — 961 10/3/2023 As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. The contractor is responsible for all hazardous waste relating to his work. The Geotechnical Consultant does not have expertise in this area. If hazardous waste is a concern, then the Client should acquire the services of a qualified environmental assessor. 2.2 Processing: Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free from oversize material and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free from uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. 2.3 Overexcavation: In addition to removals and overexcavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic -rich, highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be overexcavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.4 Benching. Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5:1 shall also be benched or otherwise overexcavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2.5 Evaluation/Acceptance of Fill Areas: All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of processed areas, keys, and benches. 3.0 Fill Material 3.1 General. Material to be used as fill shall be essentially free from organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential, or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Pag i Council 18 — 962 10/3/2023 3.2 Oversize: Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 inches, shall not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials, and placement methods are specifically accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant. Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. 3.3 Imnort: If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The potential import source shall be given to the Geotechnical Consultant at least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its suitability can be determined and appropriate tests performed. 4.0 Fill Placement and Compaction 4.1 Fill Lavers: Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near -horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughly to attain relative uniformity of material and moisture throughout. 4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning: Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). 4.3 Compaction of Fill: After each layer has been moisture -conditioned, mixed, and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes: In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum density per ASTM Test Method D 1557-91. LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Pag i Council 18 — 963 10/3/2023 4.5 Compaction Testinw: Field tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). 4.6 Frequency of Compaction Testing: Tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition, as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. 4.7 Compaction Test Locations: The Geotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum, two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided. 5.0 Subdrain Installation Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be allowed by the Contractor for these surveys. 6.0 Excavation Excavations, as well as over -excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill -over -cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Pag i Council 18 — 964 10/3/2023 7.0 Trench Backfills 7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OHSA and Cal/OSHA requirements for safety of trench excavations. Z2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE>30). The bedding shall be placed to 1 foot over the top of the conduit and densifed by jetting. Backfll shall be placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum from 1 foot above the top of the conduit to the surface. 7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of fill. Z5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Pag i Council 18 — 965 10/3/2023 GREENHOUSE GAS TECHNICAL REPORT Introduction This technical report examines the direct and indirect impacts of the proposed Cabrillo Town Center Project related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and global climate change by disclosing GHG emissions generation and by addressing the Project's consistency with applicable GHG emission reduction plans, policies, and regulations. Calculation worksheets and documentation are included in the Technical Appendix to this analysis. Environmental Setting Global climate change refers to changes in average climatic conditions on Earth as a whole, including changes in temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms. Global warming, a related concept, is the observed increase in average temperature of Earth's surface and atmosphere. One identified cause of global warming is an increase of GHG emissions in the atmosphere. GHG emissions are those compounds in Earth's atmosphere that play a critical role in determining Earth's surface temperature. Earth's natural warming process is known as the "greenhouse effect." It is called the greenhouse effect because Earth and the atmosphere surrounding it are like a greenhouse with glass panes in that the glass allows solar radiation (sunlight) into Earth's atmosphere but prevents radiative heat from escaping, thus warming Earth's atmosphere. Some levels of GHG emissions keep the average surface temperature of Earth close to a hospitable 60 degrees Fahrenheit. However, it is believed that excessive concentrations of anthropogenic GHG emissions in the atmosphere can result in increased global mean temperatures, with associated adverse climatic and ecological consequences.' Scientists studying the particularly rapid rise in global temperatures have determined that human activity has resulted in increased emissions of GHG emissions, primarily from the burning of fossil fuels (from motor vehicle travel, electricity generation, consumption of natural gas, industrial activity, manufacturing), deforestation, agricultural activity, and the decomposition of solid waste. Scientists refer to the global warming context of the past century as the "enhanced greenhouse effect" to distinguish it from the natural greenhouse effect.2 Global GHG emissions due to human activities have grown since pre -industrial times. As reported by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), global carbon emissions from fossil fuels increased by over 16 times between 1900 and 2008 and by about 1.5 times between 1990 and 2008. In addition, in the Global Carbon Budget 2014 report, published in September 2014, atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in 2013 were found to be 43 percent above the concentration at the start of the Industrial Revolution, and the present concentration is the highest during at least the last 800,000 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, 11 and I II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. 2 Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, Climate Change 101: Understanding and Responding to Global Climate Change. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 years.3 Global increases in CO2 concentrations are due primarily to fossil fuel use, with land use change providing another significant but smaller contribution. Regarding emissions of non-CO2 GHG, these have also increased significantly since 1990. In particular, studies have concluded that it is very likely that the observed increase in methane (CH4) concentration is predominantly due to agriculture and fossil fuel use.4 In August 2007, international climate talks held under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) led to the official recognition by the participating nations that global emissions of GHG must be reduced. According to the "Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments of Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol," avoiding the most catastrophic events forecast by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) would entail emissions reductions by industrialized countries in the range of 25 to 40 percent below 1990 levels. Because of the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism, which gives industrialized countries credit for financing emission -reducing projects in developing countries, such an emissions goal in industrialized countries could ultimately spur efforts to cut emissions in developing countries as well.' With regard to the adverse effects of global warming, as reported by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), "Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, and natural environment in southern California and beyond. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include, among others, a reduction in the quantity and quality of water supply, a rise in sea level, damage to marine and other ecosystems, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases. Over the past few decades, energy intensity of the national and state economy has been declining due to the shift to a more service -oriented economy. California ranked fifth lowest among the states in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption per unit of Gross State Product. However, in terms of total CO2 emissions, California is second only to Texas in the nation and is the 12th largest source of climate change emissions in the world, exceeding most nations. The SCAG region, with close to half of the state's population and economic activities, is also a major contributor to the global warming problem." GHG Emissions Background. GHG emissions include CO2, CH4, nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).6 Carbon dioxide is the most abundant GHG. Other GHG emissions are less abundant but have higher global warming potential than CO2. Thus, emissions of other GHG emissions are frequently expressed in the equivalent mass of CO2, denoted as CO2e. Forest fires, decomposition, industrial processes, landfills, and consumption of fossil fuels for power generation, transportation, heating, and 3 C. Le Quere, et al., Global Carbon Budget 2014, (Earth System Science Data, 2015, doi:10.5194/essd-7- 47-2015). 4 USEPA, Atmospheric Concentrations of Greenhouse Gas, updated June 2015. 5 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Press Release —Vienna UN Conference Shows Consensus on Key Building Blocks for Effective International Response to Climate Change, August 31, 2007 6 As defined by California Assembly Bill (AB) 32 and Senate Bill (SB) 104. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 2 City of Santa Ana GreenhouC VS ouncil Report 18 — 967 10/3/2023 July 2023 cooking are the primary sources of GHG emissions. A general description of the GHG emissions is provided in Table 1. Global Warming Potential (GWP) is one type of simplified index based upon radiative properties used to estimate the potential future impacts of emissions of different gases upon the climate system. The GWP is based on several factors, including the radiative efficiency (heat -absorbing ability) of each gas relative to that of CO2, as well as the decay rate of each gas (the amount removed from the atmosphere over a given number of years) relative to that of CO2. The higher the GWP, the more that a given gas warms the Earth compared to CO2 over that period. A summary of the atmospheric lifetime and GWP of selected gases is presented in Table 2.' As indicated on the table, the GWP ranges from 1 to 22,800. Projected Impacts of Global Warming in California. The scientific community's understanding of the fundamental processes responsible for global climate change has improved over the past decade, and its predictive capabilities are advancing. However, there remain significant scientific uncertainties in, for example, predictions of local effects of climate change, occurrence, frequency, and magnitude of extreme weather events, effects of aerosols, changes in clouds, shifts in the intensity and distribution of precipitation, and changes in oceanic circulation. Due to the complexity of the Earth's climate system and inability to accurately model it, the uncertainty surrounding climate change may never be eliminated. Nonetheless, the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report, Summary for Policy Makers states that, "it is extremely likely that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas concentrations and other anthropogenic forces together."8 A report from the National Academy of Sciences concluded that 97 to 98 percent of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of the IPCC in that climate change is very likely caused by human (i.e., anthropogenic) activity.9 According to the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the potential impacts in California due to global climate change may include: loss in snow pack; sea level rise; more extreme heat days per year; more high ozone days; more large forest fires; more drought years; increased erosion of California's coastlines and sea water intrusion into the Sacramento and San Joaquin Deltas and associated levee systems; and increased pest infestation. Below is a summary of some of the potential effects that could be experienced in California because of global warming and climate change. Air Quality. Higher temperatures, conducive to air pollution formation, could worsen air quality in California. Climate change may increase the concentration of ground -level ozone, but the magnitude of the effect and, therefore, its indirect effects, are uncertain. If higher temperatures are accompanied by drier conditions, the potential for large wildfires could increase, which, in turn, would exacerbate air quality. Additionally, severe heat accompanied by drier conditions and poor air quality could increase Atmospheric lifetime is defined as the time required to turn over the global Atmospheric burden. Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001 (TAR), Chapter 4: Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases, 2001, p. 247. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Fifth Assessment Report, Summary for Policy Makers, page 5, 2013, http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/. Accessed April 2020. Anderegg, William R. L., J.W. Prall, J. Harold, S.H., Schneider, Expert Credibility in Climate Change, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:12107-12109. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 3 •.: City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 the number of heat -related deaths, illnesses, and asthma attacks throughout the state.10 However, if higher temperatures are accompanied by wetter, rather than drier conditions, the rains would temporarily clear the air of particulate pollution and reduce the incidence of large wildfires, thus ameliorating the pollution associated with wildfires. In 2009, the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) published the California Climate Adaptation Strategy as a response to the Governor's Executive Order S-13-2008.11 The CNRA report lists specific recommendations for state and local agencies to best adapt to the anticipated risks posed by a changing climate. In accordance with the California Climate Adaptation Strategy, the California Energy Commission (CEC) was directed to develop a website on climate change scenarios and impacts that would be beneficial for local decision makers.12 The website, known as Cal -Adapt, became operational in 201113 and provides a projection of potential future climate scenarios. The data are comprised of the average values (i.e., temperature, sea -level rise, snowpack) from a variety of scenarios and models and are meant to illustrate how the climate may change based on a variety of different potential social and economic factors. Water Supply. Uncertainty remains with respect to the overall impact of global climate change on future water supplies in California. Studies have found that, "[c]onsiderable uncertainty about precise impacts of climate change on California hydrology and water resources will remain until we have more precise and consistent information about how precipitation patterns, timing, and intensity will change."14 For example, some studies identify little change in total annual precipitation in projections for California while others show significantly more precipitation.15 Warmer, wetter winters would increase the amount of runoff available for groundwater recharge; however, this additional runoff would occur at a time when some basins are either being recharged at their maximum capacity or are already full. Conversely, reductions in spring runoff and higher evapotranspiration because of higher temperatures could reduce the amount of water available for recharge.16 10 California Environmental Protection Agency, Preparing California for Extreme Heat: Guidance and Recommendations, October 2013, https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OHE/CDPH%2ODocument%2OLibrary/CCHEP-General/CDPH-EPA- 2013-Preparing-CA-for-Extreme-Heat_ADA.pdf. Accessed April 2020 11 California Natural Resources Agency, Climate Action Team, 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy: A Report to the Governor of the State of California in Response to Executive Order S-13-2008, 2009. 12 California Natural Resources Agency, Climate Action Team, 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy: A Report to the Governor of the State of California in Response to Executive Order S-13-2008, 2009. 13 The Cal -Adapt website address is: http://cal-adapt.org. 14 Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security, Climate Change and California Water Resources: A Survey and Summary of the Literature, July 2003, page 5, http://www.pacinst.org/reports/ climate _change_and_california_water_resources.pdf. Accessed April 2020. 15 Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security, Climate Change and California Water Resources: A Survey and Summary of the Literature, July 2003, http://www.pacinst.org/reports/ climate _change_and_california_water _resources.pdf. Accessed April 2020. 16 California Natural Resources Agency, Safeguarding California: Reducing Climate Risk, an Update to the 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy, 2014. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 4 M. City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 The California Department of Water Resources report on climate change and effects on the State Water Project (SWP), the Central Valley Project, and the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta, concludes that "climate change will likely have a significant effect on California's future water resources ... [and] future water demand." It also reports that "much uncertainty about future water demand [remains], especially [for] those aspects of future demand that will be directly affected by climate change and warming. While climate change is expected to continue through at least the end of this century, the magnitude and, in some cases, the nature of future changes is uncertain."17 It also reports that the relationship between climate change and its potential effect on water demand is not well understood, but "[i]t is unlikely that this level of uncertainty will diminish significantly in the foreseeable future." Still, changes in water supply are expected to occur, and many regional studies have shown that large changes in the reliability of water yields from reservoirs could result from only small changes in inflows.18 In its Fifth Assessment Report, the IPCC states "Changes in the global water cycle in response to the warming over the 21st century will not be uniform. The contrast in precipitation between wet and dry regions and between wet and dry seasons will increase, although there may be regional exceptions."19 Hydrology and Sea Level Rise. As discussed above, climate change could potentially affect: the amount of snowfall, rainfall, and snow pack; the intensity and frequency of storms; flood hydrographs (flash floods, rain or snow events, coincidental high tide, and high runoff events); sea level rise and coastal flooding; coastal erosion; and the potential for salt water intrusion. Sea level rise can be a product of global warming through two main processes: expansion of seawater as the oceans warm, and melting of ice over land. A rise in sea levels could result in coastal flooding and erosion and could jeopardize California's water supply. Increased storm intensity and frequency could affect the ability of flood -control facilities, including levees, to handle storm events. Agriculture. California has a $30 billion agricultural industry that produces half the country's fruits and vegetables. Higher CO2 levels can stimulate plant production and increase plant water -use efficiency. However, if temperatures rise and drier conditions prevail, water demand could increase; crop -yield could be threatened by a less reliable water supply; and greater ozone pollution could render plants more susceptible to pest and disease outbreaks. In addition, temperature increases could change the time of year certain crops, such as wine grapes, bloom or ripen, and thus affect their quality.20 Ecosystems and Wildlife. Increases in global temperatures and the potential resulting changes in weather patterns could have ecological effects on a global and local scale. Increasing concentrations of GHGs are likely to accelerate the rate of climate change. Scientists expect that the average global 17 California Department of Water Resources Climate Change Report, Progress on Incorporating Climate Change into Planning and Management of California's Water Resources, July 2006, page 2-54, https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/climatechange/docs/CCprogress_nov06.pdf. Accessed April 2020 18 California Department of Water Resources Climate Change Report, Progress on Incorporating Climate Change into Planning and Management of California's Water Resources, July 2006, page 2-75, https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/climatechange/docs/CCprogress_nov06.pdf. Accessed April 2020 19 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Fifth Assessment Report, Summary for Policy Makers, 2013, page 20. 20 California Climate Change Center, Our Changing Climate: Assessing the Risks to California, 2006, https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/our-changing-climate-assessing-risks-california. Accessed April 2020. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 5 City of Santa Ana Greenhoutl VS ouncil Report 18 — 970 10/3/2023 July 2023 surface temperature could rise by 2-11.5°F (1.1-6.4°C) by 2100, with significant regional variation.21 Soil moisture is likely to decline in many regions, and intense rainstorms are likely to become more frequent. Sea level could rise as much as 2 feet along most of the United States coastline. Rising temperatures could have four major impacts on plants and animals: (1) timing of ecological events; (2) geographic range; (3) species' composition within communities; and (4) ecosystem processes such as carbon cycling and storage.22 Table 1 Description of Identified GHG Emissionsa Greenhouse Gas General Description Carbon Dioxide An odorless, colorless GHG, which has both natural and anthropocentric (CO2) sources. Natural sources include the following: decomposition of dead organic matter; respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus; evaporation from oceans; and volcanic outgassing. Anthropogenic (human caused) sources of CO2 are burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. Methane (CH4) A flammable gas and is the main component of natural gas. When one molecule of CH4 is burned in the presence of oxygen, one molecule of CO2 and two molecules of water are released. A natural source of CH4 is the anaerobic decay of organic matter. Geological deposits, known as natural gas fields, also contain CH4, which is extracted for fuel. Other sources are from landfills, fermentation of manure, and cattle. Nitrous Oxide A colorless GHG. High concentrations can cause dizziness, euphoria, and (N20) sometimes slight hallucinations. N2O is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including those reactions which occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (fossil fuel -fired power plants, nylon production, nitric acid production, and vehicle emissions) also contribute to its atmospheric load. It is used in rocket engines, racecars, and as an aerosol spray propellant. Hydrofluorocarbons Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are gases formed synthetically by replacing all (HFCs) hydrogen atoms in CH4 or ethane (C2H6) with chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. CFCs are non -toxic, non-flammable, insoluble, and chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at Earth's surface). CFCs were first synthesized in 1928 for use as refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. Because they destroy stratospheric ozone, the production of CFCs was stopped as required by the Montreal Protocol in 1987. HFCs are synthetic man-made chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs as refrigerants. HFCs deplete stratospheric ozone, but to a much lesser extent than CFCs. 21 National Research Council, Advancing the Science of Climate Change, 2010, http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/Science-Report-Brief- final.pdf. Accessed April 2020. 22 Parmesan, C., and H. Galbraith, Observed Impacts of Global Climate Change in the U.S., Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, November 2004, https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2004/11 /observed-impacts-climate-change-united-states.pdf. Accessed April 2020. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 6 City of Santa Ana GreenhouC VS ouncil Report 18 — 971 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 1 Description of Identified GHG Emissionsa Greenhouse Gas General Description Perfluorocarbons PFCs have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the (PFCs) chemical processes in the lower atmosphere. High-energy ultraviolet rays about 60 kilometers above Earth's surface destroy the compounds. PFCs have very long lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years. Two common PFCs are tetrafluoromethane and hexafluoroethane. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semi -conductor manufacturing. Sulfur Hexafluoride An inorganic, odorless, colorless, non -toxic, and non-flammable gas. SFs is (SFs) used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semi -conductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection. Nitrogen Trifluoride An inorganic, non -toxic, odorless, non-flammable gas. NF3 is used in the (NFs) manufacture of semi -conductors, as an oxidizer of high-energy fuels, for the preparation of tetrafluorohydrazine, as an etchant gas in the electronic industry, and as a fluorine source in high power chemical lasers. GHG emissions identified in this table are ones identified in the Kyoto Protocol and other synthetic gases recently added to the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report. Source: Association of Environmental Professionals, Alternative Approaches to Analyze Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Global Climate Change in CEQA Documents, Final, June 29, 2007, Environmental Protection Agency, Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride; January 2009. Table 2 Atmospheric Lifetimes and Global Warming Potential Gas Atmospheric Lifetime ears Global Warming Potential (100-year time horizon) Carbon Dioxide CO2 50-200 1 Methane CHa 12 +/-3 25 Nitrous Oxide N2O 114 298 HFC-23: Fluoroform CHFs 270 14,800 HFC-134a: 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane CH2FCF3) 14 1,430 HFC-152a: 1,1-Difluoroethane C2H4F2 1.4 124 PFC-14: Tetrafluoromethane CFa 50,000 7,390 PFC-116: Hexafluoroethane C2F6 10,000 12,200 Sulfur Hexafluoride SFs 3,200 22,800 Nitrogen Trifluoride NFs 740 1 17,200 Source: IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Working Group 1: The Physical Science Basis, Direct Global Warmin Potentials Regulatory Framework: Federal In response to growing scientific and political concern with global climate change, federal and state entities have adopted a series of laws to reduce emissions of GHG emissions to the atmosphere. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 7 18-972 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Federal Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, 127 S.Ct. 1438 (2007), that CO2 and other GHG emissions are pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), which the USEPA must regulate if it determines they pose an endangerment to public health or welfare. The U.S. Supreme Court did not mandate that the USEPA enact regulations to reduce GHG emissions. Instead, the Court found that the USEPA could avoid acting if it found that GHG emissions do not contribute to climate change or if it offered a "reasonable explanation" for not determining that GHG emissions contribute to climate change. On April 17, 2009, the USEPA issued a proposed finding that GHG emissions contribute to air pollution that may endanger public health or welfare. On April 24, 2009, the proposed rule was published in the Federal Register under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171. The USEPA stated that high atmospheric levels of GHG emissions "are the unambiguous result of human emissions and are very likely the cause of the observed increase in average temperatures and other climatic changes." The USEPA further found that "atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare within the meaning of Section 202 of the Clean Air Act." The findings were signed by the USEPA Administrator on December 7, 2009. The final findings were published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2009. The final rule was effective on January 14, 2010.23 While these findings alone do not impose any requirements on industry or other entities, this action is a prerequisite to regulatory actions by the USEPA, including, but not limited to, GHG emissions standards for light -duty vehicles. On April 4, 2012, the USEPA published a proposed rule to establish, for the first time, a new source performance standard for GHG emissions. Under the proposed rule, new fossil fuel —fired electric generating units larger than 25 megawatts (MW) are required to limit emissions to 1,000 pounds of CO2 per MW-hour (CO2/MWh) on an average annual basis, subject to certain exceptions. Subsequently, on April 23, 2018, the USEPA issued a policy stating that CO2 emissions from biomass -fired and other biogenic sources would be considered carbon neutral when used for energy production at stationary sources. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards. In response to the Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency ruling, the George W. Bush Administration issued Executive Order 13432 in 2007, directing the USEPA, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), and the United States Department of Energy (USDOE) to establish regulations that reduce GHG emissions from motor vehicles, non -road vehicles, and non -road engines by 2008. In 2009, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a final rule regulating fuel efficiency for and GHG emissions from cars and light -duty trucks for model year 2011; in 2010, the USEPA and the NHTSA issued a final rule regulating cars and light -duty trucks for model years 2012-2016. In 2010, President Obama issued a memorandum directing the USEPA, USDOT, USDOE, and NHTSA to establish additional standards regarding fuel efficiency and GHG emissions reduction, clean fuels, and advanced vehicle infrastructure. In response to this directive, the USEPA and NHTSA proposed 23 USEPA, Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Final Rule. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 8 18 — 973 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 stringent, coordinated federal GHG emissions and fuel economy standards for model years 2017-2025 light -duty vehicles. The proposed standards are projected to achieve 163 grams/mile of CO2 in model year 2025, on an average industry fleet -wide basis, which is equivalent to 54.5 miles per gallon (mpg) if the standards were achieved solely through fuel efficiency. The final rule was adopted in 2012 for model years 2017-2021. In March 2020, NHTSA and USEPA adopted new less stringent standards covering model years 2021 through 2026. In addition to the regulations applicable to cars and light -duty trucks described above, in 2011 the USEPA and the NHTSA announced fuel economy and GHG standards for medium- and heavy-duty trucks for model years 2014-2018. The standards for CO2 emissions and fuel consumption are tailored to three main vehicle categories: combination tractors, heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans, and vocational vehicles. According to the USEPA, this regulatory program would reduce GHG emissions and fuel consumption for the affected vehicles by 6 to 23 percent over the 2010 baselines.24 Building on the success of the first phase of standards, in August 2016, the USEPA and the NHTSA finalized Phase 2 standards for medium and heavy-duty vehicles through model year 2027 that will improve fuel efficiency and cut carbon pollution. The Phase 2 standards were to lower CO2 emissions by approximately 1.1 billion metric tons and save vehicle owners fuel costs of about $170 billion.25 On August 10, 2021, NHTA proposed new CAFE standards for 2024-2026 that would increase the stringency of standards by 8 percent per year rather than the previous 1.5 percent. On September 19, 2019, the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and USEPA issued a final action entitled the "One National Program Rules" to enable the federal government to provide nationwide uniform fuel economy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards for automobile and light duty trucks. This action finalizes the Safe Affordable Fuel Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule and clarifies that federal law preempts state and local tailpipe GHG emissions standards as well as zero emission vehicle (ZEV) mandates. The SAFE Vehicle Rule also withdraws the CAA waiver granted to the State of California that allowed the state to enforce its own Low Emission Vehicle program.26 On March 31, 2020, Part II of the SAFE Vehicles was issued and sets carbon dioxide emissions and CAFE standards for passenger vehicles and light duty trucks, covering model years 2021-2026.27 On December 21, 2021, NHTA repealed the SAFE I Rule. 24 The emission reductions attributable to the regulations for medium- and heavy-duty trucks were not included in the Project's emissions inventory due to the difficulty in quantifying the reductions. Excluding these reductions results in a more conservative (i.e., higher) estimate of emissions for the Project. 25 USEPA and NHTSA Adopt Standards to Reduce GHG and Improve Fuel Efficiency of Medium- and Heavy - Duty Vehicles for Model Year 2018 and Beyond, August 2016. 26 U.S. Department of Transportation and EPA. 2019. One National Program Rule on Federal Preemption of State Fuel Economy Standards, https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/final-rule- one-national-program-federal-preemption- state#:—:text=In%20this%20action%20NHTSA%20is,and%20local%20programs%20are%20preempted. 27 U.S. Department of Transportation. 2020. The Safer Affordable Fuel -Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, https://www. nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/final—safe—preamble—web—version-200330.pdf. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 9 City of Santa Ana GreenhouC VS ouncil Report 18 — 974 10/3/2023 July 2023 Energy Independence and Security Act. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) facilitates the reduction of national GHG emissions by requiring the following: • Increasing the supply of alternative fuel sources by setting a mandatory Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) that requires fuel producers to use at least 36 billion gallons of biofuel in 2022; • Prescribing or revising standards affecting regional efficiency for heating and cooling products, procedures for new or amended standards, energy conservation, energy efficiency labeling for consumer electronic products, residential boiler efficiency, electric motor efficiency, and home appliances; • Requiring approximately 25 percent greater efficiency for light bulbs by phasing out incandescent light bulbs between 2012 and 2014; requiring approximately 200 percent greater efficiency for light bulbs, or similar energy savings, by 2020; and • While superseded by the USEPA and the NHTSA actions described above, (i) establishing miles per gallon targets for cars and light trucks, and (ii) directing the NHTSA to establish a fuel economy program for medium- and heavy-duty trucks and create a separate fuel economy standard for trucks. Additional provisions of the EISA address energy savings in government and public institutions, promote research for alternative energy, additional research in carbon capture, international energy programs, and the creation of "green jobs."28 Regulatory Framework: State Executive Order S-3-05. This Executive Order, issued by Governor Schwarzenegger in June 2005, established GHG emissions targets for the state, as well as a process to ensure the targets are met. The order directed the Secretary for the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) to report every two years on the state's progress toward meeting the Governor's GHG emission reduction targets. The statewide GHG emissions reduction targets are as follows: • By 2010, reduce to 2000 emission levels;29 • By 2020, reduce to 1990 emission levels; • By 2030, reduce to 40 percent below 1990 levels; and • By 2050, reduce to 80 percent below 1990 levels. 28 A green job, as defined by the United States Department of Labor, is a job in business that produces goods or provides services that benefit the environment or conserve natural resources. 29 The 2010 target to reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels was not met. Source: Rubin, Thomas A.," Does California Really Need Major Land Use and Transportation Changes to Meet Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets?," July 3, 2013. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 10 City of Santa Ana GreenhouC VS ouncil Report 18 — 975 10/3/2023 July 2023 The State Legislature adopted equivalent 2020 and 2030 statewide targets in the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (also known as Assembly Bill [AB] 32) and Senate Bill 32, respectively, both of which are discussed below. However, the Legislature has not yet adopted a target for the 2050 horizon year. As a result of Executive Order S-3-05, the California CAT, led by the Secretary of CaIEPA, was formed. The CAT is made up of representatives from several state agencies and was formed to implement global warming emission reduction programs and to report on the progress made toward meeting statewide targets established under the Executive Order. The CAT reported several recommendations and strategies for reducing GHG emissions and reaching the targets established in the Executive Order.30 The CAT stated that smart land use is an umbrella term for strategies that integrate transportation and land -use decisions. Such strategies generally encourage jobs/housing proximity, promote transit - oriented development (TOD), and encourage high -density residential/commercial development along transit corridors. These strategies develop more efficient land -use patterns within each jurisdiction or region to match population increases, workforce, and socioeconomic needs for the full spectrum of the population. "Intelligent transportation systems" is the application of advanced technology systems and management strategies to improve operational efficiency of transportation systems and the movement of people, goods, and service.31 Executive OrderB-30-15. Issued by Governor Brown in April 2015, established an additional statewide policy goal to reduce GHG emissions 40 percent below their 1990 levels by 2030. Reducing GHG emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels in 2030 and by 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 (consistent with Executive Order S-3-05) aligns with scientifically established levels needed in the U.S. to limit global warming below 2 degrees Celsius.32 Executive Order B-55-18. Issued by Governor Jerry Brown in September 2018, this establishes a statewide goal to achieve carbon neutrality as soon as possible, but no later than 2045, and achieve and maintain net negative emissions thereafter. Based on this executive order, CARB would work with relevant state agencies to develop a framework for implementation and accounting that tracks progress towards this goal, as well as ensuring future scoping plans identify and recommend measures to achieve the carbon neutrality goal. Executive Order S-1-07 (California Low Carbon Fuel Standard). Executive Order S-1-07, the LCFS (issued on January 18, 2007), requires a reduction of at least 10 percent in the carbon intensity of California's transportation fuels by 2020. Regulatory proceedings and implementation of the LCFS were directed to CARB. The LCFS has been identified by CARB as a discrete early action item in the adopted Climate Change Scoping Plan. The LCFS program was re -adopted in 2015 and will continue to 30 CaIEPA, Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature, March 2006. 31 CaIEPA, Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature, March 2006, p. 58. 32 California Air Resources Board, Frequently Asked Questions about Executive Order B-30-15, 2030 Carbon Target and Adaptation FAQs, April 29, 2015. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 11 City of Santa Ana GreenhouC VS ouncil Report 18 — 976 10/3/2023 July 2023 complement other AB 32 measures, transform, and diversify the fuel pool, and is a key part of the State's petroleum reduction goals for 2030. California Assembly Bill 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006) and Senate Bill 32. The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (also known as AB 32) commits the state to achieving the following: • By 2010, reduce to 2000 GHG emission levels;33 and • By 2020, reduce to 1990 levels. To achieve these goals, which are consistent with the California CAT GHG emissions reduction targets for 2010 and 2020, AB 32 mandates that CARB establish a quantified emissions cap, institute a schedule to meet the cap, implement regulations to reduce statewide GHG emissions from stationary sources consistent with the CAT strategies, and develop tracking, reporting, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that reductions are achieved. To achieve the reduction targets, AB 32 requires CARB to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process that achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emissions reductions.34 Senate Bill (SB) 32, signed September 8, 2016, updates AB 32 (the Global Warming Solutions Act) to include an emissions reductions goal for 2030. Specifically, SB 32 requires the state board to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 40 percent below the 1990 level by 2030. The new plan, outlined in SB 32, involves increasing renewable energy use, imposing tighter limits on the carbon content of gasoline and diesel fuel, putting more electric cars on the road, improving energy efficiency, and curbing emissions from key industries. Assembly Bill 197. Assembly Bill (AB) 197, signed September 8, 2016, is a bill linked to SB 32 that prioritizes efforts to cut GHG emissions in low-income or minority communities. AB 197 requires CARB to make available, and update at least annually, on its Internet Web site the emissions of greenhouse gases, criteria pollutants, and toxic air contaminants for each facility that reports to CARB and air districts. In addition, AB 197 adds two Members of the Legislature to the CARB board as ex officio, non- voting members and creates the Joint Legislative Committee on Climate Change Policies to ascertain facts and make recommendations to the Legislature and the houses of the Legislature concerning the state's programs, policies, and investments related to climate change. 33 The 2010 target to reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels was not met. Source: Rubin, Thomas A., "Does California Really Need Major Land Use and Transportation Changes to Meet Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets?", July 3, 2013. 34 CARB's list of discrete early action measures that could be adopted and implemented before January 1, 2010, was approved on June 21, 2007. The three adopted discrete early action measures are: (1) a low - carbon fuel standard, which reduces carbon intensity in fuels statewide; (2) reduction of refrigerant losses from motor vehicle air conditioning system maintenance; and (3) increased methane capture from landfills, which includes requiring the use of state-of-the-art capture technologies. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 12 City of Santa Ana GreenhouC VS ouncil Report 18 — 977 10/3/2023 July 2023 Senate Bill 350. Senate Bill (SB) 350, signed October 7, 2015, is the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015. SB 350 is the implementation of some of the goals of Executive Order B-30-15. The objectives of SB 350 are: (1) to increase the procurement of electricity from renewable sources from 33 percent to 50 percent by December 31, 2030; and (2) to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses of retail customers through energy efficiency and conservation.35 Senate Bill 1368. Senate Bill (SB) 1368, signed September 29, 2006, is a companion bill to AB 32 that requires the CPUC and the CEC to establish GHG emission performance standards for the generation of electricity. These standards also generally apply to power that is generated outside of California and imported into the state. SB 1368 provides a mechanism for reducing the emissions of electricity providers, thereby assisting CARB to meet its mandate under AB32. On January 25, 2007, the CPUC adopted an interim GHG Emissions Performance Standard, which is a facility -based emissions standard requiring that all new long-term commitments for baseload generation to serve California consumers be with power plants that have GHG emissions no greater than a combined cycle gas turbine plant. That level is established at 1,100 pounds of CO2 per MWh. Furthermore, on May 23, 2007, the CEC adopted regulations that establish and implement an identical Emissions Performance Standard of 1,100 pounds Of CO2 per MWh (see CEC Order No. 07-523-7). Assembly Bill 1493 (Pavley 1). Assembly Bill (AB) 1493, passed in 2002, requires the development and adoption of regulations to achieve "the maximum feasible reduction of greenhouse gases" emitted by noncommercial passenger vehicles, light -duty trucks, and other vehicles used primarily for personal transportation in the state. CARB originally approved regulations to reduce GHG emissions from passenger vehicles in September 2004, with the regulations to take effect in 2009. On September 24, 2009, CARB adopted amendments to these "Pavley" regulations that reduce GHG emissions in new passenger vehicles from 2009 through 2016.36 Although setting emission standards on automobiles is solely the responsibility of the USEPA, the federal CAA allows California to set state -specific emission standards on automobiles if the state first obtains a waiver from the USEPA. The USEPA granted California that waiver on July 1, 2009. A comparison between the AB 1493 standards and the Federal CAFE standards was completed by CARB and the analysis determined that California emission standards are 16 percent more stringent through the 2016 model year and 18 percent more stringent for 2020 model year.37 California is also committed to further strengthening these standards beginning with 2020 model year vehicles to obtain a 45-percent GHG reduction in comparison to the 2009 model year. 35 Senate Bill 350 (2015-2016 Reg, Session) Stats 2015, ch. 547. 36 California Air Resources Board, Clean Car Stand ards—Pavley, Assembly Bill 1493, www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ccros/ccros.htm, accessed April 2020. 37 California Air Resources Board, "Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Reductions for all Fifty United States under CAFE Standards and ARB Regulations Adopted Pursuant to AB 1493", January 23, 2008. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 13 City of Santa Ana GreenhouCi VS ouncil ep° 18 — 978 10/3/2023 July 2023 Senate Bill 97. SB 97, passed in August 2007, is designed to work in conjunction with CEQA and AB 32. SB 97 requires the Office of Planning and Rules (OPR) to prepare and develop guidelines for the mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects thereof, including, but not limited to, the effects associated with transportation and energy consumption. The Draft Guidelines Amendments for Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Guidelines Amendments) were adopted on December 30, 2009 and address the specific obligations of public agencies when analyzing GHG emissions under CEQA to determine a project's effects on the environment. However, neither a threshold of significance nor any specific mitigation measures are included or provided in the Guidelines Amendments.38 The Guidelines Amendments require a lead agency to make a good -faith effort, based on the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate, or estimate the amount of GHG emissions resulting from a project. The Guidelines Amendments give discretion to the lead agency whether to: (1) use a model or methodology to quantify GHG emissions resulting from a project, and which model or methodology to use; or (2) rely on a qualitative analysis or performance- based standards. Furthermore, the Guidelines Amendments identify the following three factors that should be considered in the evaluation of the significance of GHG emissions: 1. The extent to which a project may increase or reduce GHG emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting; 2. Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project; and 3. The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions.39 The administrative record for the Guidelines Amendments also clarifies "that the effects of greenhouse gas emissions are cumulative and should be analyzed in the context of CEQA's requirements for cumulative impact analysis."ao In December 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) approved a CEQA and Climate Change Advisory that updated the 2009 guidance for project -level analyses. It reaffirms the discretion that lead agencies have in establishing an appropriate methodology and determining significance. Senate Bill 743. This 2013 legislation updates the way transportation impacts are measured in California, focusing on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rather than level of service as the main measure of transportation impacts. It calls on decisionmakers throughout the State to focus on reducing overall VMT 38 See 14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15064.7 (generally giving discretion to lead agencies to develop and publish thresholds of significance for use in the determination of the significance of environmental effects), 15064.4 (giving discretion to lead agencies to determine the significance of impacts from GHG emissions). 39 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15064.4(b). 40 Letter from Cynthia Bryant, Director of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research to Mike Chrisman, California Secretary for Natural Resources, dated April 13, 2009. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 14 City of Santa Ana GreenhouCi VS ouncil ep° 18 — 979 10/3/2023 July 2023 and the GHG emissions from such vehicle activity. Traffic studies in the City of Santa Ana began formally analyzing projects in this fashion effective July 1, 2020. Senate Bill 375. Acknowledging the relationship between land use planning and transportation sector GHG emissions, Senate Bill (SB) 375 was passed by the State Assembly on August 25, 2008 and signed by the Governor on September 30, 2008. This legislation links regional planning for housing and transportation with the GHG reduction goals outlined in AB 32. Reductions in GHG emissions would be achieved by, for example, locating employment opportunities close to transit. Under SB 375, each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) would be required to adopt a Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) to encourage compact development that reduce passenger VMT and trips so that the region will meet a target, created by CARB, for reducing GHG emissions. If the SCS is unable to achieve the regional GHG emissions reduction targets, then the MPO is required to prepare an alternative planning strategy that shows how the GHG emissions reduction target could be achieved through alternative development patterns, infrastructure, and/or transportation measures. Assembly Bill 1279. This 2022 legislation creates a legally binding goal that California achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. It would also require the State to reduce GHG emissions by 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045. Climate Change Scoping Plan. In 2008, CARB approved the original Climate Change Scoping Plan as required by AB 32.41 Subsequently, CARB approved updates to the Climate Change Scoping Plan in 2014 (First Update) and 2017 (2017 Update), with the 2017 Update considering SB 32 (adopted in 2016) in addition to AB 32. In December 2022, CARB adopted the 2022 Update, which addresses the State{s goal for carbon neutrality by 2045. The original Climate Change Scoping Plan proposed a "comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall carbon GHG emissions in California, improve our environment, reduce our dependence on oil, diversify our energy sources, save energy, create new jobs, and enhance public health.42 The original Climate Change Scoping Plan identified a range of GHG reduction actions that included direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non -monetary incentives, voluntary actions, market -based mechanisms, such as a cap -and -trade system, and an AB 32 implementation fee to fund the program. The original Climate Change Scoping Plan called for a "coordinated set of solutions" to address all major categories of GHG emissions. Transportation emissions were addressed through a combination of higher standards for vehicle fuel economy, implementation of the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), and greater consideration to reducing trip length and generation through land use planning and transit - oriented development. Buildings, land use, and industrial operations were encouraged and, sometimes, required to use energy more efficiently. Utility energy providers were required change to include more 41 Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan was approved by CARB on December 11, 2008. 42 California Air Resources Board, Climate Change Scoping Plan, December 2008. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 15 W. City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 renewable energy sources through implementation of the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS).43 Additionally, the original Climate Change Scoping Plan emphasized opportunities for households and businesses to save energy and money through increasing energy efficiency. It indicated that substantial savings of electricity and natural gas would be accomplished through "improving energy efficiency by 25 percent." The original Climate Change Scoping Plan identified several specific issues relevant to the Project, including the following: • The potential of using the green building framework as a mechanism, which could enable GHG emissions reductions in other sectors (i.e., electricity, natural gas), noting that: A Green Building strategy will produce greenhouse gas savings through buildings that exceed minimum energy efficiency standards, decrease consumption of potable water, reduce solid waste during construction and operation, and incorporate sustainable materials. Combined, these measures can also contribute to healthy indoor air quality, protect human health, and minimize impacts to the environment. • The importance of supporting the Department of Water Resources' work to implement the Governor's objective to reduce per capita water use by 20 percent by 2020.44 Specific measures to achieve this goal include water use efficiency, water recycling, and reuse of urban runoff. The original Climate Change Scoping Plan noted that water use requires significant amounts of energy, including approximately one -fifth of statewide electricity. • Encouraging local governments to set quantifiable emission reduction targets for their jurisdictions and use their influence and authority to encourage reductions in emissions caused by energy use, waste and recycling, water and wastewater systems, transportation, and community design. Forecasting the emissions for 2020 if no actions are taken was necessary to assess the scope of the reductions California must make to return to the 1990 emissions level by 2020 as required by AB 32. CARB originally defined the "business -as -usual" or BAU scenario as emissions in the absence of any GHG emission reduction measures discussed in the original Climate Change Scoping Plan. For example, in further explaining CARB's BAU methodology, CARB assumed that all new electricity generation would be supplied by natural gas plants, no further regulatory action would impact vehicle fuel efficiency, and building energy efficiency codes would be held at 2005 standards. In the original Climate Change Scoping Plan, CARB determined that achieving the 1990 emissions level in 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of approximately 28.5 percent from the otherwise projected 2020 43 For a discussion of Renewables Portfolio Standard, refer to Subsection 2(h)(i), California Renewables Portfolio Standard. 44 California Department of Water Resources, 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan. The Plan called for California to reduce per capita water use from 192 to 154 gallons per capita daily from 2009 to 2020 and beyond. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/hot topics/20x2O2O/docs/2Ox2O2Oplan.pdf Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 16 City of Santa Ana GreenhouC VS ouncil Report 18 — 981 10/3/2023 July 2023 emissions level (i.e., those emissions that would occur in 2020, absent GHG-reducing laws and regulations).45 In 2014, CARB adopted the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework (First Update).46 The stated purpose of the First Update was to "highlight... California's success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lay ... the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.47 The First Update found that California is on track to meet the 2020 emissions reduction mandate established by AB 32 and noted that California could reduce emissions further by 2030 to levels squarely in line with those needed to stay on track to reduce emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 if the state realizes the expected benefits of existing policy goals.48 In conjunction with the First Update, CARB identified "six key focus areas comprising major components of the state's economy to evaluate and describe the larger transformative actions that will be needed to meet the state's more expansive emission reduction needs by 2050.49 Those six areas were: (1) energy; (2) transportation (vehicles/equipment, sustainable communities, housing, fuels, and infrastructure); (3) agriculture; (4) water; (5) waste management; and (6) natural and working lands. The First Update identified key recommended actions for each sector that would facilitate achievement of the 2050 reduction target. The First Update discussed new residential and commercial building energy efficiency improvements, specifically identifying progress towards zero net energy buildings as an element of meeting mid-term and long-term GHG emissions reduction goals. The First Update expressed CARB's commitment to working with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and California Energy Commission (CEC) to facilitate further achievements in building energy efficiency. In December 2017, CARB adopted California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update: The Strategy forAchieving California's 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target (2017 Scoping Plan Update). The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan addresses the deeper cuts required by SB 32 by a 2030 horizon year and has a range of GHG reduction actions that include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non -monetary incentives, voluntary actions, market -based mechanisms such as a cap -and -trade system, and an AB 32 implementation fee to fund the program. The 2017 Scoping Plan Update includes policies to require direct GHG emissions reductions at some of the state's largest stationary sources and mobile sources. These policies include the use of lower GHG fuels, efficiency regulations, and the Cap -and -Trade program, which constrains and reduces emissions at covered sources. 45 California Air Resources Board, Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change, p. 12, December 2008. 46 Health & Safety Code §38561(h) requires CARB to update the Scoping Plan every five years. 47 California Air Resources Board, First Update, May 2014, p. 4. 48 California Air Resources Board, First Update, May 2014, p. 34. 49 California Air Resources Board, First Update, May 2014, p. 6. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 17 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 CARB adopted its 2022 Scoping Plan update on December 15, 2022 that lays the groundwork to achieving carbon neutrality statewide by 2045. The 2022 Scoping Plan is designed to reduce GHG emissions 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045. Most reductions would come from conversion from combustion -based industries and technologies to electricity. While Statewide programs calling for electrifying the vehicle fleet and energy sources would account for the vast majority of GHG reductions needed by 2030, local actions are needed to supplement these. The Scoping Plan recommends City's develop local Climate Action Plans (CAPS) that are consistent with the Scoping Plan's GHG reduction goals, incorporate State -level GHG priorities into processes for approving land use projects, implement mitigation measures as needed to reduce GHG emissions from developments, and leverage opportunities for regional collaboration. Cap -and -Trade Program. The original Climate Change Scoping Plan identified a cap -and -trade program as one of the strategies for California to reduce GHG emissions. Under cap -and -trade, an overall limit on GHG emissions from capped sectors is established, and facilities subject to the cap can trade permits to emit GHG emissions within the overall limit. The Program is designed to reduce GHG emissions from major sources, such as refineries and power plants, (deemed "covered entities"). "Covered entities" subject to the Cap -and -Trade Program are sources that emit more than 25,000 metric tons CO2e (MTCO2e) per year. Triggering of the 25,000 MTCO2e per year "inclusion threshold" is measured against a subset of emissions reported and verified under the California Regulation for the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Mandatory Reporting Rule or MRR). Under the Cap -and -Trade Program, CARB issues allowances equal to the total amount of allowable emissions over a given compliance period and distributes these to regulated entities. Covered entities are allocated free allowances in whole or in part (if eligible) and may buy allowances at auction, purchase allowances from others, or purchase offset credits. Each covered entity with a compliance obligation is required to surrender an allowance for each metric ton CO2e of GHG they emit. The Cap -and -Trade Program provides a firm cap, ensuring that the 2030 statewide emission limit will not be exceeded. An inherent feature of the Cap -and -Trade program is that it does not guarantee GHG emissions reductions in any discrete location or by any source. Rather, GHG emissions reductions are only guaranteed on a cumulative basis. As summarized by CARB in the First Update: The Cap -and -Trade Regulation gives companies the flexibility to trade allowances with others or take steps to cost-effectively reduce emissions at their own facilities. Companies that emit more have to turn in more allowances or other compliance instruments. Companies that can cut their GHG emissions have to turn in fewer allowances. But as the cap declines, aggregate emissions must be reduced. For example, a covered entity theoretically could increase its GHG emissions every year and still comply with the Cap -and -Trade Program if there is a commensurate reduction in GHG emissions from other covered entities. Such a focus on aggregate GHG emissions is considered appropriate because climate change is a global phenomenon, and the effects of GHG emissions are considered cumulative. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 18 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 The Cap -and -Trade Program works with other direct regulatory measures and provides an economic incentive to reduce emissions. If California's direct regulatory measures reduce GHG emissions more than expected, then the Cap -and -Trade Program will be responsible for relatively fewer emissions reductions. If California's direct regulatory measures reduce GHG emissions less than expected, then the Cap -and -Trade Program will be responsible for relatively more emissions reductions. Thus, the Cap - and -Trade Program assures that California will meet its 2030 GHG emissions reduction mandate. The Cap -and -Trade Program establishes an overall limit on GHG emissions from most of the California economy —the "capped sectors." Within the capped sectors, some of the reductions are being accomplished through direct regulations, such as improved building and appliance efficiency standards, the [Low Carbon Fuel Standard] LCFS, and the 33 percent [Renewables Portfolio Standard] RPS. Whatever additional reductions are needed to bring emissions within the cap is accomplished through price incentives posed by emissions allowance prices. Together, direct regulation and price incentives assure that emissions are brought down cost- effectively to the level of the overall cap. (...]50 Overall, the Cap -and -Trade Program will achieve aggregate, rather than site -specific or project -level, GHG emissions reductions. Also, due to the regulatory framework adopted by CARB in AB 32, the reductions attributed to the Cap -and -Trade Program can change over time depending on the state's emissions forecasts and the effectiveness of direct regulatory measures. The Cap -and -Trade Program covered approximately 450 businesses responsible for about 85 percent of California's GHG emissions.51 The Cap -and -Trade Program covers the GHG emissions associated with electricity consumed in California, whether generated in -state or imported. Accordingly, GHG emissions associated with CEQA projects' electricity usage are covered by the Cap -and- Trade Program. The Cap -and -Trade Program also covers fuel suppliers (natural gas and propane fuel providers and transportation fuel providers) to address emissions from such fuels and from combustion of other fossil fuels not directly covered at large sources in the Program's first compliance period.52 Furthermore, the Cap -and -Trade Program also covers the GHG emissions associated with the combustion of transportation fuels in California, whether refined in state or imported. The point of regulation for transportation fuels is when they are "supplied" (i.e., delivered into commerce). Accordingly, as with stationary source GHG emissions and GHG emissions attributable to electricity use, virtually all, if not all, of GHG emissions from CEQA projects associated with vehicle -miles traveled (VMT) are covered by the Cap -and -Trade Program. 50 California Air Resources Board, First Update, May 2014, p. 88. 51 Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, California Cap-and-Trade,https://www.c2es.org/content/california- cap-and-trade/, accessed April 2020. 52 While the Cap -and -Trade Program technically covered fuel suppliers as early as 2012, fuel suppliers did not have a compliance obligation (i.e., they were not fully regulated) until 2015. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 19 City of Santa Ana GreenhouC VS ouncil Report 18 — 984 10/3/2023 July 2023 Assembly Bill 398 was enacted in 2017 to extend the Cap -and -Trade Program from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2030. As part of AB 398, refinements were made to the Cap -and -Trade program to establish updated protocols and allocation of proceeds to reduce GHG emissions. California Renewables Portfolio Standard. The California RPS program (2002, SB 1078) required that 20 percent of the available energy supplies are from renewable energy sources by 2017. In 2006, SB 107 accelerated the 20 percent mandate to 2010. These mandates apply directly to investor -owned utilities. On April 12, 2011, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law SB 2X, which modified California's RIPS program to require that both public and investor -owned utilities in California receive at least 33 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by the year 2020. Advanced Clean Cars Regulations. In 2012, CARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) program, a new emissions -control program for model years 2015-2025.53 The components of the Advance Clean Car program include the Low -Emission Vehicle (LEV) regulations that reduce criteria pollutants and GHG emissions from light- and medium -duty vehicles, and the Zero- Emission Vehicle (ZEV) regulation, which requires manufacturers to produce an increasing number of pure ZEVs (meaning battery electric and fuel cell electric vehicles), with provisions to also produce plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) in the 2018 through 2025 model years.54 On September 23, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Executive Order No. N-79-20 that phases out sales of new gas -powered passenger cars by 2035 in California with an additional ten-year transition period for heavy vehicles. The state would not restrict used car sales, nor forbid residents from owning gas -powered vehicles. In accordance with the Executive Order, CARB is developing a 2020 Mobile Source Strategy, a comprehensive analysis that presents scenarios for possible strategies to reduce the carbon, toxic and unhealthy pollution from cars, trucks, equipment, and ships. The strategies will provide important information for numerous regulations and incentive programs going forward by conveying what is necessary to address the aggressive emission reduction requirements. In November 2022, the ACC II regulations took effect, setting annual ZEV and plug-in hybrid vehicle sales requirements for model years 2026 to 2035 (ZEV program) and increasingly more stringent exhaust and evaporative emission standards (LEV program) to ensure automakers phase out new sales of internal combustion engine vehicles. California Appliance Efficiency Regulations (Title 20, Sections 1601 through 1608). The 2014 Appliance Efficiency Regulations, adopted by the CEC, include standards for new appliances (e.g., refrigerators) and lighting, if they are sold or offered for sale in California. These standards include minimum levels of operating efficiency, and other cost- effective measures, to promote the use of energy - and water -efficient appliances. 53 California Air Resources Board, California's Advanced www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/acc/acc.htm, accessed April 2020. 54 Ibid. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 20 Clean Cars Program, City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6). California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, located at Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations and commonly referred to as "Title 24," were established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. Title 24 requires the design of building shells and building components to conserve energy. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods.55 The 2022 standards continue to improve upon previous standards for new construction of, and additions and alterations to, residential and non-residential buildings and became effective January 1, 2023. Compliance with Title 24 is enforced through the building permit process. Key changes included encouraging heat pump technology for space and water heating, setting electric -ready requirements for single-family homes, expanding solar photovoltaic system and battery storage standards, and strengthening ventilation standards to improve indoor air quality. California Green Building Standards (CALGreen Code). The California Green Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11) are mandatory green building standards for new structures. They focus on measures to reduce water consumption, GHG emissions, and materials and waste. These codes are updated every three years, with the 2022 CalGreen code updates effective January 1, 2023. New requirements address requirements for Level 2 electric vehicle chargers and use of solar photovoltaic shade structures instead of shade trees. Voluntary measures focus on higher EV charging requirements for parking facilities. Regulatory Framework: Regional South Coast Air Quality Management District. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) adopted a "Policy on Global Warming and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion" on April 6, 1990. The policy commits the SCAQMD to consider global impacts in rulemaking and in drafting revisions to the Air Quality Management Plan. In March 1992, the SCAQMD Governing Board reaffirmed this policy and adopted amendments to the policy to include the following directives: • Phase out the use and corresponding emissions of chlorofluorocarbons, methyl chloroform (1,1,1-trichloroethane or TCA), carbon tetrachloride, and halons by December 1995; • Phase out the large quantity use and corresponding emissions of hydrochlorofluorocarbons by the year 2000; • Develop recycling regulations for hydrochlorofluorocarbons (e.g., SCAQMD Rules 1411 and 1415); • Develop an emissions inventory and control strategy for methyl bromide; and 55 California Energy Commission, 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2019- building-energy-efficiency, accessed April 2020. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 21 • : • City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 • Support the adoption of a California GHG emission reduction goal. Southern California Association of Governments. To implement SB 375 and reduce GHG emissions by correlating land use and transportation planning, SCAG adopted the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS on September 3, 2020, calling for $639 billion in transportation investments and reducing VMT by 19 percent per capita from 2005 to 2035. The updated plan accommodates 21.3 percent growth in population from 2016 (3,933,800) to 2045 (4,771,300) and a 15.6 percent growth in jobs from 2016 (1,848,300) to 2045 (2,135,900). The updated RTP/SCS calls for several land use -based strategies to accommodate growth, minimize criteria pollutant emissions, and achieve climate change objectives: • Decreasing drive -along work commutes by three percent • Reducing per capita VMT by five percent and vehicle hours traveled per capita by nine percent • Increasing transit commuting by two percent • Reducing travel delay per capita by 26 percent • Creating 264,500 new jobs annually • Reducing greenfield development by 29 percent by focusing on smart growth • Locating six more percent household growth in High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs), which concentrate roadway repair investments, leverage transit and active transportation investments, reduce regional life cycle infrastructure costs, improve accessibility, create local jobs, and have the potential to improve public health and housing affordability. • Locating 15 percent more jobs in HQTAs The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS calls for a 19 percent reduction in per capita GHG emissions by 2035 from 2005 levels. This is intended to be consistent with CARB's performance targets during this same period. The bulk of these reductions are to come from transportation investments, pricing strategies, TDM strategies, and land use programs. On October 30, 2020, CARB accepted the RTP/SCS quantification of GHG emissions on October 30, 2020 (Executive Order G-20-239, SCAG 2020 SCS ARB Acceptance of GHG Quantification Determination). Regulatory Framework: Local City of Santa Ana Building Code. The City relies on the 2022 Title 24 building codes and 2022 California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen, effective January 1, 2023) that promote green building requirements that reduce carbon -based emissions from new construction and remodels. City of Santa Ana Climate Action Plan. In December 2015, the City adopted the Climate Action Plan (CAP) that documents the City's GHG emissions inventory and sets a 2020 GHG emission reduction target of 15 percent below 2005 levels and a 2035 target of 30 percent below 2005 levels. It projected that 67 percent of these reductions by 2020 would come from energy sector changes, while 17 percent would come from transportation/land use and solid waste/water/wastewater sectors apiece. However, by 2035, the CAP projected that 54 percent of reductions would come from transportation and land use programs. The City has dedicated $750,000 in its 2024 budget to prepare an update to the City's CAP. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 22 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Existing Conditions Existing Statewide GHG Emissions. GHG emissions are the result of both natural and human - influenced activities. Regarding human -influenced activities, motor vehicle travel, consumption of fossil fuels for power generation, industrial processes, heating and cooling, landfills, agriculture, and wildfires are the primary sources of GHG emissions. Without human intervention, Earth maintains an approximate balance between the emission of GHG emissions into the atmosphere and the storage of GHG emissions in oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. Events and activities, such as the industrial revolution and the increased combustion of fossil fuels (e.g., gasoline, diesel, coal), have contributed to the rapid increase in atmospheric levels of GHG emissions over the last 150 years. As reported by the CEC, California contributes approximately one percent of global and 8.2 percent of national GHG emissions.56 California represents approximately 12 percent of the national population. Approximately 80 percent of GHGs in California are CO2 produced from fossil fuel combustion. The current California GHG inventory compiles statewide anthropogenic GHG emissions and carbon sinks/storage from years 2000 through 2019.57 It includes estimates for CO2, CH4, N20, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6. The GHG inventory for California for years 2010 through 2019 is presented in Table 3. As shown therein, the GHG inventory for California in 2019 was 418.2 million MTCO2e. Table 3 California GHG Inventory (metric tons of carbon dioxide eaulivalent fMTCO,eli 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Transportation 161.2 162.6 166.2 169.8 171.2 169.6 166.1 Electric Power 91.7 92.5 90.3 89.0 88.8 89.2 88.2 Industrial 16.8 17.7 18.6 19.2 20.0 20.4 20.6 Commercial & Residential 91.4 88.9 84.8 68.6 62.1 63.1 58.8 Agriculture 161.2 1 162.6 166.2 169.8 1 171.2 169.6 166.1 High GWP 91.4 88.9 84.8 68.6 62.1 63.1 58.8 Recvclina & Waste 91.7 92.5 90.3 89.0 88.8 89.2 88.2 Total 447.5 443.0 440.7 429.1 424.6 425.1 418.2 Source: California Air Resources Board (2021). California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory - 2021 Edition. Data available at: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm 56 California Energy Commission, Tracking Progress, Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions. https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/tracking-progress. Accessed July 2023. 57 A carbon inventory identifies and quantifies sources and sinks of greenhouse gases. Sinks are defined as a natural or artificial reservoir that accumulates and stores some carbon -containing chemical compound for an indefinite period. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 23 City of Santa Ana Greenhoutl VS ouncll Report 18 - 988 10/3/2023 July 2023 Existing Project Site Emissions. The Project Site is improved with four commercial buildings totaling 173,025 square feet and 617 surface parking spaces. As summarized in Table 4, most existing GHG emissions are associated with the 1,876 daily vehicle trips traveling to and from the Project Site.58 Table 4 Annual GHG Emissions Summary (Existing)' (metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent [MTCO2e]) Secgtor MTCO2a Area 4 Energy° (electricity and natural gas) 724 Mobile 2,482 Solid Wasted 50 Water/Wastewatere 75 Refrigerants <1 Total Emissions 3,335 a CO2e was calculated using CaIEEMod and the results are provided in the Technical Appendix. b Area source emissions are from landscape equipment and other operational equipment only; hearths omitted. Energy source emissions are based on CaIEEMod default electricity and natural gas usage rates. d Solid waste emissions are calculated based on CaIEEMod default solid waste generation rates. e Water/Wastewater emissions are calculated based on CaIEEMod default water consumption rates. Source: DKA Planning, 2023. Methodology CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a) assist lead agencies in determining the significance of the impacts of GHG emissions, giving them discretion to determine whether to assess impacts quantitatively or qualitatively. It calls for a good -faith effort to describe and calculate emissions. This emissions inventory also demonstrates the reduction in a project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions that results from regulations and requirements adopted as implementation efforts for these plans for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. As such, it provides further justification that a project is consistent with plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions by a project and over time. The significance of a project's GHG emissions impacts is not based on the amount of GHG emissions resulting from that project. The City, SCAQMD, Office of Planning and Research (OPR), CARB, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), and other applicable agencies have not adopted a numerical threshold of significance for assessing impacts related to GHG emissions. As a result, the methodology for evaluating a project's impacts related to GHG emissions focuses on its consistency with statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions.59 This 58 Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. 59 CEQA Guidelines, Section 14 CCR 15064.4. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 24 •:- City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 evaluation is the sole basis pursuant to CEQA for determining the significance of a project's GHG-related impacts on the environment. The analysis also calculates the amount of GHG emissions from the Project using recommended air quality models. The primary purpose of quantifying the Project's GHG emissions is to satisfy CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a). The estimated emissions inventory is also used to determine if there would be a reduction in the Project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions because of compliance with regulations requirements adopted to implement plans for reducing or mitigating GHG emissions. However, the significance of the Project's GHG emissions is not based on the amount of emissions from the Project. Consistency with Applicable Plans and Policies A consistency analysis has been provided that describes the Project's compliance with or exceedance of performance -based standards, and consistency with applicable plans and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, included in the applicable portions of the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's CAP. As part of the Climate Change Scoping Plan, a statewide emissions inventory was developed as required by AB 32 which directs CARB to develop and track GHG emissions reductions to document progress towards the state GHG target. The emissions inventory also takes into account GHG emissions reduction measures developed by CARB to achieve state targets. Consistency with the Climate Change Scoping Plan is evaluated by comparing the Project's GHG emissions reduction measures to those contained in the Scoping Plan. As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(b)(3), consistency with such plans and policies "must reduce or mitigate the project's incremental contribution of greenhouse gas emissions." To demonstrate such incremental reductions, this chapter estimates reductions of Project -related GHG emissions resulting from consistency with plans. Consistent with evolving scientific knowledge, approaches to GHG emissions quantification may continue to evolve in the future. While there are many ways to quantify the efficiency of the GHG reduction measures provided for in the plans and policies, this analysis compares the Project's GHG emissions to the emissions that would be generated by the Project in the absence of any GHG emissions reduction measures (i.e., the Project Without Reduction Features Scenario. This approach is consistent with the concepts used in CARB's 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan. This methodology is used to analyze consistency with applicable GHG emissions reduction plans and policies and demonstrate the efficacy of the measures contained therein, but it is not a threshold of significance. The analysis in this section includes potential emissions under the Project Without Reduction Features scenarios and from the Project at build -out based on actions and mandates expected to be in force in 2026. Early -action measures identified in the Climate Change Scoping Plan that have not been approved were not credited in this analysis. By not speculating on potential regulatory conditions, the analysis takes a conservative approach that likely overestimates the Project's GHG emissions at build -out. The Project Without Reduction Features scenario is used to establish a comparison with project -generated Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 25 ••1 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 GHG emissions. The Project Without Reduction Features scenario does not consider site -specific conditions, project design features, or prescribed mitigation measures. As an example, The Project Without Reduction Features scenario would apply a base Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip -generation rate for the Project and would not consider site -specific benefits resulting from the proposed mix of uses or close proximity to public transportation. Based on further guidance from the 2022 Scoping Plan, this analysis also evaluates whether the Project would incorporate key GHG strategies for residential and mixed -use projects:60 • Provide EV charging infrastructure that, at a minimum, meets the most ambitious voluntary standard in the California Green Building Standards Code. • Locate projects on infill sites surrounded by urban uses and is served by existing utilities and essential public services (e.g., transit, streets, water, sewer). • Does not result in the loss or conversion of natural and working lands. • Consists of transit -supportive densities (i.e., 20 dwelling units per acre), is within 0.5 mile of transit stops, or satisfies more detailed and stringent criteria in the regional SCS. • Reduces parking requirements. • Dedicating at least 20 percent of residents as affordable to lower -income residents. • Results in no net loss of existing affordable units. • Uses all -electric appliances without any natural gas connections and does not use propane of other fossil fuels for space heating, water heating, or indoor cooking. Pursuant to the 2022 Scoping Plan, these project attributes help identify residential and mixed -use projects that are "clearly consistent with the State's climate goals." Quantification of Emissions This analysis quantifies the Project's GHG emissions for information purposes, considering the GHG reduction features that would be incorporated into the Project's design. It relies on the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and GHG emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects. CaIEEMod was developed in collaboration with the air districts of California, who provided data (e.g., emission factors, trip lengths, meteorology, source inventory) to account for local requirements and conditions. The model is considered by SCAQMD to be an accurate and comprehensive tool for quantifying air quality and GHG impacts from land use projects throughout California. This analysis quantifies the Project's emissions and compares them to a Project without Reduction 60 California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality, Appendix D (Local Actions) Table 3; November 2022. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 26 18-991 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Features scenario, as defined by CARB's most updated projections for AB 32 and SB 32. This comparison is included for informational purposes to disclose the relative carbon efficiency of the Project and to determine if there would be a reduction in the Project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions based on compliance with regulations and requirements adopted to implement plans for reducing GHG emissions. The Project Without Reduction Features scenario does not consider site -specific conditions, Project design features, or prescribed mitigation measures. This approach is consistent with the concepts used in the CARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan for the implementation of AB 32. This methodology is used to analyze consistency with applicable GHG reduction plans and policies and demonstrate the efficacy of the measures contained therein, but it is not a threshold of significance. The Project Without Reduction Features scenario is similar to the approach currently used by the City with respect to evaluating a proposed development project's consistency with CARB's Scoping Plans. Currently, the City evaluates the proposed project under two scenarios —one scenario without GHG reduction measures (akin to the Project Without Reduction Features scenario) and a second scenario with GHG reduction measures. The Project without Reduction Features scenario also does not account for energy efficiency measures that would go beyond Title 24 building standards or trip reductions from the co -location of uses and availability of public transit. However, the Project without Reduction Features does consider regulatory measures included in CARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's CAP. Project GHG Emissions The California Climate Action Registry (Climate Registry) General Reporting Protocol provides basic procedures and guidelines for calculating and reporting GHG emissions from a number of general and industry -specific activities.61 The General Reporting Protocol is based on the "Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard" developed by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the World Resources Institute through "a multi -stakeholder effort to develop a standardized approach to the voluntary reporting of GHG emissions."62 Although no numerical thresholds of significance have been developed, and no specific protocols are available for land use projects, the General Reporting Protocol provides a basic framework for calculating and reporting GHG emissions from the project. The information provided in this section is consistent with the General Reporting Protocol's reporting requirements. The General Reporting Protocol recommends the separation of GHG emissions into three categories that reflect different aspects of ownership or control over emissions. They include the following: • Scope 1: Direct, onsite combustion of fossil fuels (e.g., natural gas, propane, gasoline, and diesel). • Scope 2: Indirect, offsite emissions associated with purchased electricity or purchased steam. 61 California Climate Action Registry, General Reporting Protocol Version 3.1, January 2009. 62 Ibid. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 27 18-992 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 • Scope 3: Indirect emissions associated with other emissions sources, such as third -party vehicles and embodied energy (e.g., energy used to convey, treat, and distribute water and wastewater).63 The General Reporting Protocol provides a range of basic calculations methods. However, the General Reporting Protocol calculations are typically designed for existing buildings or facilities. These retrospective calculation methods are not directly applicable to planning and development situations where buildings do not yet exist. CARB recommends consideration of indirect emissions to provide a more complete picture of the GHG emissions footprint of a facility. Annually reported indirect energy usage aids the conservation awareness of a facility and provides information to CARB to be considered for future strategies.64 For example, CARB has proposed requiring the calculation of direct and indirect GHG emissions as part of the AB 32 reporting requirements. Additionally, OPR has noted that lead agencies "should make a good - faith effort, based on available information, to calculate, model, or estimate... GHG emissions from a project, including the emissions associated with vehicular traffic, energy consumption, water usage and construction activities."65 Therefore, direct and indirect emissions have been calculated for the Project. A fundamental difficulty in the analysis of GHG emissions is the global nature of the existing and cumulative future conditions. Changes in GHG emissions can be difficult to attribute to a particular planning program or project because the planning effort or project may cause a shift in the locale for some type of GHG emissions, rather than causing "new" GHG emissions. As a result, there is an inability to conclude whether a project's GHG emissions represent a net global increase, reduction, or no change in GHG emissions that would exist if the project were not implemented. The analysis of the Project's GHG emissions is particularly conservative in that it assumes all the GHG emissions are new additions to the atmosphere. Construction The Project's construction emissions were calculated using CaIEEMod Version 2022.1.1.14. Details of the modeling assumptions and emission factors are provided in the Technical Appendix. CaIEEMod calculates emissions from off -road equipment usage and on -road vehicle travel associated with haul, delivery, and construction worker trips. GHG emissions during construction were forecasted based on the proposed construction schedule and included the mobile source and fugitive dust emissions factors derived from CaIEEMod. The calculations of the emissions generated during Project construction activities reflect the types and quantities of construction equipment that would be used to remove existing pavement, grade, and 63 Embodied energy is a scientific term that refers to the quantity of energy required to manufacture and supply to the point of use a product, material, or service. 64 California Air Resources Board, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, Proposed Regulation for Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32), Planning and Technical Support Division Emission Inventory Branch, October 19, 2007. 65 OPR Technical Advisory, p. 5. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 28 18 — 993 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 excavate the Project Site; construct the proposed building and related improvements; and plant new landscaping within the Project Site. In accordance with SCAQMD's guidance, GHG emissions from construction were amortized (i.e., averaged annually) over the lifetime of the Project. Because emissions from construction activities occur over a relatively short-term period, they contribute a relatively small portion of the overall lifetime GHG emissions for the Project. In addition, GHG emissions reduction measures for construction equipment are relatively limited. Thus, SCAQMD recommends that construction emissions be amortized over a 30- year project lifetime, so that GHG emissions reduction measures will address construction GHG emissions as part of the operational GHG reduction strategies.66 As a result, the Project's total construction GHG emissions were divided by 30 to determine an approximate annual construction emissions estimate comparable to operational emissions. Operation Similar to construction, CalEEMod is used to calculate potential GHG emissions generated by new land uses on the Project Site, including area sources, electricity, natural gas, mobile sources, stationary sources (i.e., emergency generators), solid waste generation and disposal, and water usage/wastewater generation. Area source emissions include landscaping equipment that are based on the size of the land uses (e.g., square footage or dwelling unit), the GHG emission factors for fuel combustion, and the global warming potential (GWP) values for the GHG emissions emitted. GHG emissions associated with electricity demand are based on the size of the land uses, the electrical demand factors for the land uses, the GHG emission factors for the electricity utility provider, and the GWP values for the GHG emissions emitted. As with electricity, the emissions of GHG emissions associated with natural gas combustion are based on the size of the land uses, the natural gas combustion factors for the land uses in units of million British thermal units (MMBtu), the GHG emission factors for natural gas combustion, and the GWP values for the GHG emissions emitted.67 Mobile source GHG emissions are calculated based on an estimate of the Project's annual VMT, which is derived using CalEEMod based on the trip generation provided in the Transportation Study prepared for the Project. The CalEEMod-derived VMT values account for the daily and seasonal variations in trip frequency and length associated with new employee and visitor trips to and from the Project Site and other activities that generate a vehicle trip. Stationary source GHG emissions are based on proposed stationary sources (i.e., emergency generators) that would be provided on the Project Site. 66 SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda Item 31, December 5, 2008 67 Energy consumption estimates with CalEEMod 2022.1.1.14.1.12 are based on the California Energy Commission's 2020 Residential Appliance Saturation Survey (residential uses) and 2021 Commercial Forecast database, both of which reflected the 2019 Title 24 energy efficiency standards. These energy consumption estimates were adjusted to reflect the 2022 Title 24 standards that cumulatively produce a 0.49 percent reduction in electricity use and 0.45 percent reduction in natural gas use when compared to the 2019 standards. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 29 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 GHG emissions associated with solid waste disposal are based on the size of the Project's proposed land uses, the waste disposal rate for the land uses, the waste diversion rate, the GHG emission factors for solid waste decomposition, and the GWP values for the GHG emissions emitted. GHG emissions related to water usage and wastewater generation are based on the size of the land uses, the water demand factors, the electrical intensity factors for water supply, treatment, and distribution, electrical intensity factors for wastewater treatment, the GHG emission factors for the electricity utility provider, and the GWP values for the GHG emissions emitted. The analysis of Project GHG emissions at buildout uses assumptions in CARB's EMFAC2021 model (1.0.1) and considers actions and mandates expected to be in force when the Project is operational (e.g., Pavley I Standards, full implementation of California's 33 percent RPS by 2030 and 50 percent by 2050 and the California LCFS). In addition, because mobile source GHG emissions are directly dependent on the number of vehicle trips, a decrease in the number of project -generated trips because of project features (e.g., proximity to transit) would provide a proportional reduction in mobile source GHG emissions compared to a generic project without such Iocational benefits. Calculation of Project GHG emissions conservatively did not include actions and mandates that are not already in place but are expected to be enforced when the Project is operational (e.g., Pavley 11, which could further reduce GHG emissions from use of light -duty vehicles by 2.5 percent). Similarly, emissions reductions regarding Cap -and -Trade were not included in this analysis as they applied to other future reductions in non - transportation sectors. As for the Cap -and -Trade program's benefits for the transportation sector, the analysis utilizes CARB's assumptions in EMFAC2021 for any short-term reductions in GHG emissions. By not speculating on potential regulatory conditions, the analysis takes a conservative approach that likely overestimates the Project's GHG emissions at buildout, because the state is expected to implement several policies and programs aimed at reducing GHG emissions from the land use and transportation sectors to meet the state's long-term climate goals. There are no GHG emissions thresholds adopted by the SCAQMD that are applicable to the Project. In 2008, SCAQMD released draft guidance regarding interim CEQA GHG significance thresholds.68 Within its October 2008 document, the SCAQMD proposed the use of a percent emission reduction target to determine the significance for commercial/residential projects that emit greater than 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Under this proposal, such commercial and residential projects would have been assumed to have a less than significant impact on climate change. However, this proposed screening threshold was not adopted by the SCAQMD. Consistency with Applicable Plans and Policies A consistency analysis has been provided that describes the Project's compliance with or exceedance of performance -based standards, and consistency with applicable plans and policies adopted for the Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 30 18 — 995 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 purpose of reducing GHG emissions, included in the applicable portions of the Climate Change Scoping Plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's CAP. As part of the Climate Change Scoping Plan, a statewide emissions inventory was developed as required by AB 32 which directs CARB to develop and track GHG emissions reductions to document progress towards the state GHG target. The emissions inventory also considers GHG emissions reduction measures developed by CARB to achieve state targets. Consistency with the Climate Change Scoping Plan is evaluated by comparing the Project's GHG reduction measures to those contained in the Scoping Plan. As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(b)(3), consistency with such plans and policies "must reduce or mitigate the project's incremental contribution of greenhouse gas emissions." To demonstrate such incremental reductions, this chapter estimates reductions of project -related GHG emissions resulting from consistency with plans. Consistent with evolving scientific knowledge, approaches to GHG quantification may continue to evolve in the future. While there are many ways to quantify the efficiency of the GHG reduction measures provided for in the plans and policies, this analysis compares the Project's GHG emissions to the emissions that would be generated by the Project in the absence of any GHG reduction measures (i.e., the Project Without Reduction Features scenario. This approach is consistent with the concepts used in CARB's 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan. This methodology is used to analyze consistency with applicable GHG reduction plans and policies and demonstrate the efficacy of the measures contained therein, but it is not a threshold of significance. The analysis in this section includes potential emissions under a Project Without Reduction Features scenarios and from the Project at build -out based on actions and mandates expected to be in force in 2027. Early -action measures identified in the Climate Change Scoping Plan that have not been approved were not credited in this analysis. By not speculating on potential regulatory conditions, the analysis takes a conservative approach that likely overestimates the Project's GHG emissions at build -out. The Project Without Reduction Features scenario is used to establish a comparison with project -generated GHG emissions. The Project Without Reduction Features scenario does not consider site -specific conditions, project design features, or prescribed mitigation measures. As an example, a Project Without Reduction Features scenario would apply a base ITE trip -generation rate for the project and would not consider site -specific benefits resulting from the proximity to public transportation. Thresholds of Significance State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (Appendix G), a project would have a significant impact related to GHG emissions if the project would do the following: a) Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 31 • • • City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG emissions. The Project would comply with all applicable state and local regulatory requirements, including the provisions set forth in the City's Building Ordinance. Furthermore, the Project would also include sustainability features related to energy conservation, water conservation, and waste reduction. Project Impacts Consistency with Applicable Plans and Policies The discussion below describes the extent the Project complies with or exceeds the performance -based standards included in the regulations outlined in the Climate Change Scoping Plan and the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, each of which identifies GHG-reducing measures that directly and indirectly apply to the Proposed Project. This analysis also evaluates the Project's consistency with the City's CAP. As shown herein, the Project would be consistent with the applicable GHG reduction plans and policies. Statewide: Climate Change Scoping Plan The goal to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (Executive Order S-3-05) was codified by the Legislature as the 2006 Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32). In 2008, CARB approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan as required by AB 32 that has been updated over time to reflect updated strategies. In addition, SB 32 was approved in 2016, calling for deeper GHG emissions reductions by 2030. The 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan addresses the 2030 horizon but also addresses the objective of carbon neutrality by 2045 and has a range of GHG emissions reduction actions that include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non -monetary incentives, voluntary actions, market -based mechanisms such as a cap -and -trade system, and an AB 32 implementation fee to fund the program. The following discussion demonstrates how the pertinent reduction actions relate to and reduce project -related GHG emissions. Table 5 evaluates the Project's consistency with applicable reduction actions/strategies by emissions source category outlined in the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update.69 When compared to SB 32, the Proposed Project would be consistent with its objectives and the GHG reduction -related actions and strategies of the 2022 Scoping Plan. Table 5 confirms that the Proposed Project is consistent with the Scoping Plan's focus on increasing renewable energy use, putting more electric cars on the road, and improving energy efficiency. Although a number of these strategies are currently promulgated, some have not yet been formally proposed or adopted. It is expected that these measures or similar actions to reduce GHG emissions will be adopted as required to achieve statewide GHG emissions targets. Independent studies confirm CARB's determination that the state's existing and proposed regulatory framework will put the state on a pathway to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and to 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045 to meet carbon neutrality objectives if 69 An evaluation of stationary sources is not necessary as the stationary sources emissions will be created by emergency generators that would only be used in an emergency. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 32 18 — 997 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 additional appropriate reduction measures are adopted. Even though these studies did not provide an exact regulatory and technological roadmap to achieve the 2030 and 2050 goals, they demonstrated that various combinations of policies could allow the statewide emissions level to remain very low through 2045, suggesting that the combination of new technologies and other regulations not analyzed in the studies could allow the state to meet the 2045 target. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 33 W. City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis No Conflict. The Project represents an infill development within an urbanized area that would concentrate new residences and jobs within an HQTA and reduce per capita VMT and VMT per capita reduced 25% GHG emissions. The Project would be Smart Growth / Vehicle SIB 375: Reduce demand for fossil transportation consistent with SB 375 and its VMT Miles Traveled (VMT) below 2019 levels by 2030, and fuels and GHG reduction goals, as well as the GHG 30% below 2019 levels by 2045 and transportation goals of the 2020- 2045 RTP/SCS. The Project Site is located in both a High Quality Transit Area (HQTA) and a Transit Priority Area due to the level of local bus service. EO N-79-20: Reduce demand for fossil No Conflict. Emissions from vehicle transportation fuels and GHGs, and improve air engines from the Project would be quality. regulated by State regulations governing technology and cleaner Light -duty Vehicle 100/° ° of Light Duty Vehicle sales In November 2022, the Advanced Clean Cars II emissions. (LDV) Zero Emission regulations took effect, setting ZEV and plug-in Vehicles (ZEVs) are ZEV by 2035 hybrid vehicle sales requirements for model years 2026 to 2035 (ZEV program) and increasingly stringent emission standards (LEV program) to ensure automakers phase out sales of internal combustion engine vehicles. EO N-79-20: Reduce demand for fossil No Conflict. While the Project would transportation fuels and GHGs, and improve air not generate substantial medium- and 100% of medium -duty quality. heavy-duty truck traffic, it would not (MDV)/HDV sales are ZEV by impede the advancement of cleaner Truck ZEVs 2040 (AB 74 University of CARB's Advanced Clean Truck Regulation trucks over time. California Institute of accelerates the transition of zero -emission Transportation Studies [ITS] medium- and heavy-duty vehicles from 2024 to report) 2035. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 34 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis CARB also adopted the Innovative Clean Transit measure in 2018 that requires all public transit agencies to transition to zero emission fleets. 20% of aviation fuel demand is CARB focuses on reducing emissions from No Conflict. This strategy focuses on met by electricity (batteries) or ground support equipment and airport transit industry availability of clean fuel hydrogen (fuel cells) in 2045. alternatives over time. The Project Sustainable aviation fuel meets vehicles. It is also working with national and would not impede the advancement of Aviation most or the rest of the aviation international entities to tighten aircraft emission a cleaner aviation industry over time. fuel demand that has not already standards. AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources transitioned to hydrogen or covered by the AB 32 Inventory batteries. 2020 OGV At -Berth regulation AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. While the Project would fully implemented, with most covered by the AB 32 Inventory not directly impact trade or OGVs, it Ocean-going Vessels OGVs utilizing shore power by would not impede the advancement of (OGVs) 2027. 25% of OGVs utilize In 2015, Executive Order B-32-15 called. For a less a cleaner on- or off -shore sources over hydrogen fuel cell electric polluting freight transport system that addressed time. OGVs, transport refrigeration units, and clean technology by 2045. trucks. Executive Order N-79-20: Reduce demand for No Conflict. While the Project would petroleum fuels and GHGs, and improve air quality. not directly impact trade or port 100% of cargo handling AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources operations, it would not impede the covered by the AB 32 Inventory. advancement of a cleaner on -shore Port Operations equipment is zero -emission by sources over time. 2037. 100% of drayage trucks are In 2015, Executive Order B-32-15 called. For a less zero emission by 2035. polluting freight transport system that addressed OGVs, transport refrigeration units, and clean trucks. 100% of passenger and other AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. While the Project would covered by the AB 32 Inventory not directly impact freight or passenger locomotive sales are ZEV by rail, it would not impede the Freight and Passenger 2030. 100% of line haul In 2015, Executive Order B-32-15 called. For a less advancement of a cleaner locomotives rail locomotive sales are ZEV by polluting freight transport system that addressed over time. 2035. Line haul and passenger OGVs, transport refrigeration units, and clean rail rely primarily on hydrogen fuel trucks. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 35 18 - 1000 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis cell technology, and others The Project's land uses would not primarily utilize electricity. include freight transportation or warehousing that would be subject to the California Sustainable Freight Action Plan. Therefore, the Project would not interfere or impede the implementation of the Sustainable Freight Action Plan. No Conflict. While the Project would Reduce oil and gas extraction 1red direct emissions reductions for sources not directly impact oil extraction, it Oil and Gas Extraction operations in line with petroleum co covered by the AB 32 Inventory would help reduce demand for demand by 2045. petroleum products from energy, area, and mobile sources. CCS on majority of operations by No Conflict. While the Project would 2030, beginning in 2028 AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources not directly impact oil extraction, it Petroleum Refining Production reduced in line with covered by the AB 32 Inventory would help reduce demand for petroleum demand. petroleum products that require refining. Sector GHG target of 38 No Conflict. The Project would not MMTCO2e in 2030 and 30 directly impact the sources of MMTCO2e in 2035. Retail sales SB 350 and SB 100: Reduce GHGs and improve air electricity generation. Electricity Generation load coverage 20 gigawatts (GW) quality. AB 197: direct emissions reductions for of offshore wind by 20Meet sources covered by the AB 32 Inventory increased demand for electrification without new fossil gas -fired resources. All electric appliances beginning No Conflict. The Project would 2026 (residential) and 2029 incorporate appliances that are New Residential and (commercial), contributing to 6 AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources consistent with Title 24 and Green Commercial Buildings million heat pumps installed covered by the AB 32 Inventory Building requirements and consistent statewide by 2030. with the reduction of residential and commercial energy use. Existing Residential 80% of appliance sales are AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would Buildings electric by 2030 and 100% of covered by the AB 32 Inventory comply with Title 24 and Green Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse PAGE 36 18 — 1001 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 ,July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis appliance sales are electric by Building requirements during 2035. Appliances are replaced at construction and any future retrofit or end of life such that by 2030 there appliance replacement requirements. are 3 million all -electric and electric -ready homes —and by 2035, 7 million homes —as well as contributing to 6 million heat pumps installed statewide by 2030. 80% of appliance sales are No Conflict. While the Project is not electric by 2030, and 100% of an existing commercial development, it Existing Commercial appliance sales are electric by AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources would not interfere with any future Buildings 2045. Appliances are replaced at covered by the AB 32 Inventory requirements to retrofit commercial end of life, contributing to 6 appliances. million heat pumps installed statewide by 2030. 7.5% of energy demand 1red direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Food Products electrified directly and/or co covered by the AB 32 Inventory directly impact sources of energy for indirectly by 2030; 75% by 2045 food production. 25% of energy demand electrified AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Construction Equipment by 2030 and 75% electrified by covered by the AB 32 Inventory directly impact sources of energy for 2045 construction equipment. Electrify 0% of boilers by 2030 AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Chemicals and Allied and 100% of boilers by 2045. covered by the AB 32 Inventory directly impact the sources of energy Products; Pulp and Hydrogen for 25% of process for boilers. Paper heat by 2035 and 100% by 2045 Electrify 100% of other energy demand by 2045. CCS on 40% of operations by SB 596: Reduce demand for fossil energy, process No Conflict. The Project would not Stone, Clay, Glass, and 2035 and on all facilities by 2045 emissions, and GHGs, and improve air quality. directly impact the sources of energy Cement Process emissions reduced AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources for stone, clay, glass, and cement through alternative materials and covered by the AB 32 Inventory facilities. CCS Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 37 18 - 1002 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis Other Industrial 0% energy demand electrified by AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Manufacturing 2030 and 50% by 2045 covered by the AB 32 Inventory directly impact the sources of energy for industrial facilities. Combined Heat and AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Power Facilities retire by 2040. covered by the AB 32 Inventory affect facilities that produced heat and power. 25% energy demand electrified AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. The Project would not Agriculture Energy Use by 2030 and 75% by 2045 covered by the AB 32 Inventory affect directly agricultural sources of energy. AB 197: direct emissions reductions for sources No Conflict. This regulatory program covered by the AB 32 Inventory applies to fuel suppliers, not directly to land use development. GHG In November 2022, the Advanced Clean Cars II emissions related to vehicular travel regulations took effect, setting low emission associated with the Project would standards for transportation. benefit from this regulation because fuel used by Project -related vehicles would be required to comply with the Biomass supply is used to LCFS. Mobile source GHG emissions Low Carbon Fuels for produce conventional and estimates were calculated using Transportation advanced biofuels, as well as CaIEEMod that includes hydrogen. implementation of the LCFS into mobile source emission factors. The current LCFS targets a 20% reduction in Cl from a 2010 baseline by 2030. GHG emissions generated by Project - related vehicular travel would benefit from the Advanced Clean Cars Program. In 2030s biomethane blended in SIB 350: The Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction No Conflict. The Project would Low Carbon Fuels for pipeline Renewable hydrogen Act of 2015 increases the standards of the comply with this this action/strategy Buildings and Industry blended in fossil gas pipeline at California RIPS program by requiring that the being located within the Southern 7% energy (-20% by volume), amount of electricity generated and sold to retail California Edison (SCE) and Southern ramping up between 2030 and customers per year from eligible renewable energy California Gas (SCG) service areas Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 38 18 - 1003 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis 2040 In 2030s, dedicated resources be increased to 50 percent by 2030. and would comply with CalGreen and hydrogen pipelines constructed Required measures include increasing RPS to 50 Title 24 energy efficiency standards. to serve certain industrial clusters percent of retail sales by 2030, establishing annual SCE must generate electricity that targets for statewide energy efficiency that achieve would increase renewable energy a cumulative doubling of statewide energy resources to 33 percent by 2020 and efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas end 50 percent by 2030. As SCE would uses by 2030. provide electricity service to the Project Site, by 2030 the Project would SB 100: The California Renewables Portfolio use electricity consistent with the Standard Program (2018) requires retail sellers to requirements of SB 350. With regard procure renewable energy that is at least 50 to gas service, SCG has committed to percent by December 31, 2026 and 60 percent by achieving net zero GHG emissions in December 31, 2030. It requires local publicly its operations and delivery of gas by owned electric utilities to procure a minimum 2045. This would be accomplished quantity of electricity from renewable energy with clean fuels and hydrogen resources of 44 percent of retail sales by December technology, renewable natural gas, 31, 2024 and 60 percent by December 31, 2030. and hydrogen blends. As required under SB 350, doubling of the energy efficiency savings from retail customers by 2030 would primarily rely on the existing suite of building energy efficiency standards under CCR Title 24, Part 6 (consistency with this regulation is discussed below) and utility -sponsored programs such as rebates for high - efficiency appliances, HVAC systems, and insulation. Increase landfill and dairy SB 1383 (2016) requires CARB to set 2030 No Conflict. This program applies to Non -combustion digester methane capture. Some emission reduction targets of 40 percent for State regulators looking to reduce Methane Emissions alternative manure management methane and hydrofluorocarbons and 50 percent methane emissions from landfill and deployed for smaller dairies black carbon emissions below 2013 levels. The dairy facilities and is not directly Moderate adoption of enteric Project would comply with the CARB SLCP related to development of the Project. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 39 18 - 1004 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis strategies by 2030 Divert 75% of Reduction Strategy by using HVAC equipment with However, the Project would not organic waste from landfills by lower GWP refrigerants. interfere or impede efforts to reduce 2025. Oil and gas fugitive such pollutants. methane emissions reduced 50% by 2030 and further reductions as infrastructure components retire in line with reduced fossil gas demand SIB 605 (2014) directed CARB to develop a No Conflict. This program applies to Low GWP refrigerants introduced comprehensive Short -Lived Climate Pollutant State regulators looking to reduce high High GWP Potential as building electrification (SLCP) strategy. GWP refrigerants and is not directly Emissions increases, mitigating HFC related to development of the Project. However, the Project would not emissions interfere or impede efforts to reduce such pollutants. Conserve 30% of the state's No Conflict. This program applies to NWL and coastal waters by State regulators governing Natural and 2030. Implement near- and long- Working Lands and is not directly term actions to accelerate natural EO N-82-20 and SIB 27: CARB to include an NWL related to development of the Project. removal of carbon and build target in the Scoping Plan. AB 1757: Establish However, the Project would not Natural and Working climate resilience in our forests, targets for carbon sequestration and nature -based interfere or impede implementation of Lands wetlands, urban greenspaces, climate solutions. the Integrated Natural and Working agricultural soils, and land Lands Implementation Plan, EO N-82- conservation activities in ways SIB 1386: NWL are an important strategy in meeting 20, SIB 27, or SIB 1386. that serve all communities —and GHG reduction goals. in particular low-income, disadvantaged, and vulnerable communities. At least 2.3 million acres treated Restore health and resilience to overstocked forests No Conflict. This program applies to statewide annually in forests, and prevent carbon losses from severe wildfire, State regulators governing forest and Forests and shrublands shrublands/chaparral, and disease, and pests. Improve air quality and reduce shrubland management and is not grasslands, comprised of health costs related to wildfire emissions. Improve directly related to development of the regionally specific management water quantity and quality and improve rural Project. However, the Project would strategies that include prescribed not interfere or impede implementation Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 40 18 - 1005 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis fire, thinning, harvesting, and economies. Provide forest biomass for resource of EO B-52-18, AB 1504, or the Forest other management actions. No utilization. Carbon Plan. land conversion of forests, EO B-52-18: CARB to increase the opportunity for shrublands/chaparral, or using prescribed fire. grasslands. AB 1504 (Skinner, Chapter 534, Statutes of 2010): CARB to recognize the role forests play in carbon sequestration and climate mitigation. At least 2.3 million acres treated No Conflict. This program applies to includes increased management State regulators of grasslands and is of grasslands interspersed in not directly related to development of forests to reduce fuels the Project. However, the Project Grasslands surrounding communities using would not interfere or impede efforts to management strategies reduce fuels in grasslands surrounding appropriate for grasslands. No communities. land conversion of forests, shrublands/chaparral, or grasslands. Implement climate smart No Conflict. This program applies to practices for annual and State regulators overseeing croplands perennial crops on—80,000 acres and is not directly related to annually. Land easements/ SB 859: Recognizes the ability of healthy soils development of the Project. However, Croplands conservation on annual crops at practices to reduce GHG emissions from the Project would not interfere or —5,500 acres annually. Increase agricultural lands. impede SIB 859 and efforts to increase organic agriculture to 20% of all organic agriculture and conserve cultivated acres by 2045 croplands. (-65,000 acres annually). Increase urban forestry No Conflict. This program applies to investment by 200% above State regulators addressing urban current levels and utilize tree AB 2251 (Calderon, Chapter Statutes of 2022): forestry and is not directly related to Developed Lands watering that is 30% less Increase urban tree canopy 10 % by 2035. development of the Project. However, sensitive to drought. Establish the Project would not interfere or defensible space that accounts impede implementation of AB 2251 for property boundaries. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse. as ec PAGE 41 18 - 1006 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Table 5 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update Sector Actions and Strategies Statutes, Executive Orders, Other Direction Project Consistency Analysis and efforts to increase the urban canopy. No Conflict. This program applies to State regulators restoring Delta Restore 60,000 acres of Delta wetlands and is not directly related to Wetlands wetlands development of the Project. However, the Project would not interfere or impede efforts to restore wetland ecologies. No Conflict. This program applies to State regulators slowing the Land conversion at 50% of the conversion of sparsely vegetated Sparsely Vegetated Reference Scenario land lanes and is not directly related to Lands development of the Project. However, conversion rate. the Project would not interfere or impede efforts to slow urban conversion of such lands. AB 398 was enacted in 2017 to extend and clarify Not Applicable. This applies to the the role of the state's Cap -and -Trade Program from market -based program to reduce GHG Cap -and -Trade Implement the post-2020 Cap- January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2030. As emissions over time and is not Program and -Trade Program with part of AB 398, refinements were made to the Cap- applicable to a development project. declining annual caps. and -Trade program to establish updated protocols and allocation of proceeds to reduce GHG emissions. Source: DKA Planning, 2023 based on California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality, Scoping Plan Scenario. Cabrillo Town Center Greenhouse�� PAGE 42 18 — 1007 City of Santa Ana 10/3/2023 July 2023 Based on the analysis in Table 5, the Project would be consistent with the State's 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan's objective of achieving carbon neutrality statewide by 2045 and reducing 2030 GHG emissions in accord with SIB 32. The Project would also benefit from statewide and utility -provider efforts towards increasing the portion of electricity provided from renewable resources. SCE has committed to increasing renewable sources that exceed the Renewables Portfolio Standard requirements. The Project would include energy efficient mechanical systems, energy efficient glazing and window frames, Energy -Star appliances to be installed on -site, and the use of high -efficiency lighting. The Project would also benefit from statewide efforts to improve fuel economy of vehicles. The Project would also help reduce VMT growth given its design and complementary mix of uses at an infill site that is accessible to existing public transit. As summarized in Table 6, the Project's attributes for reducing GHG emissions consistent with many of the 2022 Scoping Plan's suggested attributes for housing and mixed -use projects that are evaluated under CEQA. Table 6 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update (Key Residential and Mixed -Use Project Attributes That Reduce GHGs) Priority Area Key Project Attribute Project Consistency Transportation Provides EV charging infrastructure that, Not Consistent. The Project would Electrification at minimum, meets the most ambitious provide 90 spaces with electric voluntary standard in the California vehicle charging equipment. CalGreen's Tier 2 voluntary Green Building Standards Code at the standards include 40 percent of time of project approval. spaces with Level 2 EV charging receptacles, 15 percent of spaces equipped with Level 2 chargers, and one receptacle per dwelling unit. While the Project would not satisfy Tier 2 voluntary standards, it would further the expansion of the EV charging network. VMT Reduction Is located on infill sites that are Consistent. The Project is located surrounded by existing urban uses and on an urban infill site along a major reuses or redevelops previously regional arterial that is served by two public transit bus lines (OCTA local undeveloped or underutilized land Lines 64 and 71), Metrolink's Santa that is presently served by existing Ana station, as well as water and utilities and essential public services sewer service. (e.g., transit, streets, water, sewer). Does not result in the loss or conversion Consistent. The Project is located of natural and working lands on an urban infill site that is currently unused. There are no natural or working lands on the Project Site. Consists of transit -supportive densities Consistent. The Project would be (minimum of 20 residential dwelling fully consistent with this attribute, as 20401 Ventura Boulevard PAGE 43 11 Z City of Santa Ana 10/3�2022 Table 6 Consistency Analysis-2022 Scoping Plan Update (Key Residential and Mixed -Use Project Attributes That Reduce GHGs) Priority Area Building Decarbonization Key Project Attribute units per acre), or Is in proximity to existing transit stops (within a half mile), or satisfies more detailed and stringent criteria specified in the region' s SCS. Reduces parking requirements by: Eliminating parking requirements or including maximum allowable parking ratios (i.e., the ratio of parking spaces to residential units or square feet); or Providing residential parking supply at a ratio of less than one parking space per dwelling unit; or for multifamily residential development, requiring parking costs to be unbundled from costs to rent or own a residential unit. At least 20 percent of units included are affordable to lower -income residents Results in no net loss of existing affordable units Uses all -electric appliances without any natural gas connections and does not use propane or other fossil fuels for space heating, water heating, or indoor cooking. Project Consistency it would provide a density of 56.5 residences per acre and would be located on an urban infill site along a major regional arterial that is served by two public transit bus lines (OCTA local Lines 64 and 71), Metrolink's Santa Ana station. Not Consistent. The Project provides two parking spaces per apartment unit (including guest spaces) and 2.2 units per townhouse. Not Consistent. The Project would be a market -rate residential development with no units dedicated to affordable housing for lower - income residents. Consistent. The Project would not remove any affordable housing units; rather, it would increase the housing stock of market -rate and affordable housing units. Not Consistent. The Project would comply with Title 24 and CalGreen standards for appliances, but not provide all -electric appliances. It would also use fossil fuels for space and water heating. Source: Priority Areas and Key Project Attributes from California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality, Appendix D (Local Actions) Table 3; November 2022. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 44 11! City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 zozs Regional: 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Table 7 provides a comparison of the Project against the GHG-related performance measures of the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Table 7 Consistency with the 2020 RTP/SCS Objectives Consistency Analysisa Increase percentage of region's total No Conflict. The Project would result in an increase of 507 household growth occurring within HQTAs. households in an HQTA, including both townhomes and attached apartments. Increase percent of the region's total No Conflict. The Project is an infill development that would employment growth occurring within create more service -related retail and commercial jobs, HQTAs. consistent with the 2020 RTP/SCS policies and would focus on job growth in HQTAs. Decrease total acreage of greenfield or No Conflict. The Project is an infill development that would otherwise rural land uses converted to reduce the demand for sprawl development in greenfield or urban use. rural areas on the fringes of Southern California. Decrease daily vehicle miles driven per No Conflict. The Project is an infill development amid heavy person. transit infrastructure that would reduce daily VMT per capita. The Project is served by two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station to the west. Decrease average daily distance traveled No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense for work and non -work trips (in miles) urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce per capita travel distances. Increase percentage of work and non -work No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense trips which are less than 3 miles in length. urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would increase the rate of travel less than three miles in length. Increase share of short trip lengths for No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense commute purposes. urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would shorten commute trips. Decrease average minutes of delay No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense experienced per capita due to traffic urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid congestion. transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit and active transportation mode share given its location along this major corridor. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 45 18 — 1010 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2123 Objectives Consistency Analysisa Decrease excess travel time resulting from No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense the difference between a reference speed urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid and actual speed. transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit and active transportation mode share given its location. As such, the Project would help reduce recurrent traffic congestion delay for general vehicles. Decrease excess travel time for heavy-duty No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense trucks result from the difference between urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid reference speed and actual speed. transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit and active transportation mode share. As such, the Project would help reduce recurrent traffic congestion delay for heavy- duty trucks. Increase percentage of PM peak period No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense trips completed within 45 minutes by travel urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid mode. transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit accessibility. Because the Project's location will attract travel to and from the corridor and local community, the share of PM peak period trips that are less than 45 minutes would increase when compared to an urban sprawl location. Increase percentage of trips that use transit No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense (work and all trips) urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would help increase transit mode share. Decrease average travel time to work (all No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense modes) urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit and active transportation mode share given its location along the corridor. As such, average travel time to work should be reduced when compared to an urban sprawl location. Increase percentage of trips using either No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense walking or biking (by trip type) urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit accessibility along the corridor. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 46 City of Santa Ana 18 - 1011 10/3/20 2021 Objectives Consistency Analysis' Reduce per capita GHG emissions (from No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense 2005 levels) urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in auto traffic and congestion by virtue of its transit accessibility. As such, it is consistent with AB 32, SB 32, SB 375, and other initiatives designed to reduce per capita GHG emissions from 2005 levels. Increase percentage of trips using a travel No Conflict. The Project is an infill development in the dense mode other than single occupancy vehicle urban corridor with a heavy density of housing and jobs amid (SOV) transit infrastructure (two OCTA bus lines 64 and 71, as well as the Santa Ana Metrolink station) that would reduce the rate of growth in SOV use and congestion by virtue of its transit accessibility within walking distance of the Project Site. Locally, the City has several conservation -based plans, programs, and requirements that also indirectly produce GHG reductions. While these are not considered climate action plans, the Proposed Project's consistency with these local initiatives is summarized. Santa Ana Climate Action Plan The 2022 CAP provides a summary table of Climate -Ready Development Standards, including mandatory measures that are applicable to development projects. It should be noted that most of the CAP's measures are voluntary, with financial incentives available to promote increased implementation of those measures. Table 8 Project Consistency with the Santa Ana CAP Source Measure Consistent Consistent. The Project includes retail uses along Development of Local Retail Fourth Street and Cabrillo Town Drive that will serve Service Nodes the Project Site and the larger Santa Ana community that will help reduce VMT associated with travel to retail services. Transportation Consistent. The Project includes 507 residences and Land Use Local Residential Nodes Near along Fourth Street and Cabrillo Town Drive on a Measures Retail and Employment largely commercial corridor that will help reduce VMT associated with travel from residences. Consistent. The Project includes retail and Local Employment Nodes commercial uses along Fourth Street and Cabrillo Near Residential and Retail Town Drive that will serve the Project Site and the Areas larger Santa Ana community that will help reduce VMT associated with travel to retail services. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 47 18 — 1012 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2021 Table 8 Project Consistency with the Santa Ana CAP Source Measure Consistency End of Trip Facilities in New Consistent. The Project includes short- and long - Projects term parking for bicycles for both residents and commercial tenants. Title 24 Energy Efficiency Consistent. The Project meets energy efficiency Community- Standards — Commercial. requirements for the commercial spaces. Wide Energy Measures Title 24 Energy Efficiency Consistent. The Project meets energy efficiency Standards — Residential. requirements for the residential spaces. Consistent. Residential and commercial tenants will AB 341 Commercial and have full -service recycling options consistent with AB Solid Waste, Multifamily Recycling. 341 that will help increase diversion of waste from Water, and landfills. Wastewater Measures Consistent. The Project will provide artificial turf in Turf Removal. its common areas and courtyards that will reduce water consumption. Source: City of Santa Ana, Climate Action Plan (Final); December 2015. Conclusion In summary, the plan consistency analysis provided above demonstrates that the Project complies with the applicable plans, policies, regulations and GHG emissions reduction actions/strategies outlined in the Climate Change Scoping Plan and Update, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the City's CAP. Consistency with the above plans, policies, regulations, and GHG emissions reduction actions/strategies would reduce the Project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions. Thus, the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of GHG emissions. Furthermore, because the Project is consistent and does not conflict with these plans, policies, and regulations, the Project's incremental increase in GHG emissions as described above would not result in a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, Project -specific impacts regarding climate change would be less than significant. Project Emissions In support of the consistency analysis above that describes the Project's compliance with, or exceedance of performance -based standards included in the regulations and policies outlined in the applicable portions of the Climate Change Scoping Plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the City's CAP, quantitative calculations are provided below. The Project would generate direct and indirect GHG emissions because of different types of emissions sources, including the following: Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 48 18 — 1013 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2121 • Construction: emissions associated with demolition of the existing uses, shoring, excavation, grading, and construction -related equipment and vehicular activity; • Area source: emissions associated with landscape equipment; • Energy source (building operations): emissions associated with electricity and natural gas use for space heating and cooling, water heating, energy consumption, and lighting; • Stationary source: emissions associated with stationary equipment (e.g., emergency generators); • Mobile source: emissions associated with vehicles accessing the Project Site; • Solid Waste: emissions associated with the decomposition of the waste, which generates methane based on the total amount of degradable organic carbon; and • Water/Wastewater: emissions associated with energy used to pump, convey, deliver, and treat water. • Refrigerants: These are substances used in equipment for air conditioning and refrigeration. Most refrigerants are HFCs or blends of them, which can have high GWP values. The Project would generate an incremental contribution to and a cumulative increase in GHG emissions. A specific discussion regarding potential GHG emissions associated with the construction and operational phases of the Project is provided below. Construction Project construction is anticipated to be completed in 2027 with occupancy the same year. A summary of construction details (e.g., schedule, equipment mix, and vehicular trips) and CaIEEMod modeling output files are provided in the Technical Appendix. The GHG emissions associated with construction of the Project were calculated for each year of construction activity. Construction of the Project is estimated to generate a total of 3,523 MTCO2e annually (Table 9). As recommended by the SCAQMD, the total GHG construction emissions were amortized over the 30-year lifetime of the Project (i.e., total construction GHG emissions were divided by 30 to determine an annual construction emissions estimate that can be added to the Project's operational emissions) to determine the Project's annual GHG emissions inventory.70 This results in annual Project construction emissions of 117 MTCO2e. A complete listing of the construction equipment by on -site and off -site activities, duration, and emissions estimation model input 70 SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda Item 31, December 5, 2008. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 49 18 — 1014 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2021 assumptions used in this analysis is included within the emissions calculation worksheets that are provided in the Technical Appendix. Table 9 Combined Construction -Related Emissions (MTCO2e) Year MTCO2e' 2024 293 2025 773 2026 1,517 2027 940 Total 3,523 Amortized Over 30 Years 117 a CO2e was calculated using CaIEEMod version 2022.1.1.14. Detailed results are provided in the Technical Appendix. Source: DKA Planning, 2023. Operation Area Source Emissions Area source emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod emissions inventory model, which includes landscape maintenance equipment, use of consumer products, and other everyday sources. As shown in Table 9, the Project would result in 19 MTCO2e per year from area sources. Table 9 Annual GHG Emissions Summary (Buildout)a (metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent [MTCO2e]) Year MTCO2a Area 19 Energy (electricity and natural gas) 908 Mobile 3,355 Solid Wasted 186 Water/Wastewatere 53 Refrigerants 1 Construction 117 Total Emissions 4,639 a CO2e was calculated using CaIEEMod and the results are provided in the Technical Appendix. b Area source emissions are from landscape equipment and other operational equipment only, hearths omitted. Energy source emissions are based on CaIEEMod default electricity and natural gas usage rates. d Solid waste emissions are calculated based on CaIEEMod default solid waste generation rates. e Water/Wastewater emissions are calculated based on CaIEEMod default water consumption rates. Source: DKA Planning, 2023. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 50 18 — 1015 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2021 Electricity and Natural Gas Generation Emissions GHG emissions are emitted because of activities in buildings when electricity and natural gas are used as energy sources. Combustion of any type of fuel emits CO2 and other GHG emissions directly into the atmosphere. When electricity is used in a building, the electricity generation typically takes place off -site at the power plant; electricity use in a building generally causes emissions in an indirect manner. Electricity and natural gas emissions were calculated for the Project using the CaIEEMod emissions inventory model, which multiplies an estimate of the energy usage by applicable emissions factors chosen by the utility company. GHG emissions from electricity use are directly dependent on the electricity utility provider. In this case, GHG emissions intensity factors for Southern California Edison (SCE) were selected in CalEEMod. The carbon intensity ((pounds per megawatt an hour (lbs/MWh)) for electricity generation was calculated for the Project buildout year based on SCE projections. A straight-line interpolation was performed to estimate the SCE carbon intensity factor for the Project buildout year. SCE's carbon intensity projections also consider SIB 350 RPS requirements for renewable energy. This approach is conservative, given the 2018 chaptering of SIB 100 (De Leon), which requires electricity providers to provide renewable energy for at least 60 percent of their delivered power by 2030 and 100 percent use of renewable energy and zero -carbon resources by 2045. SIB 100 also increases existing renewable energy targets, called Renewables Portfolio Standard (RIPS), to 44 percent by 2024 and 52 percent by 2027. The 2022 Title 24 standards contain more substantial energy efficiency requirements for new construction, emphasizing the importance of building design and construction flexibility to establish performance standards that substantially reduce energy consumption for water hating, lighting, and insulation for attics and walls. Energy use in buildings is divided into energy consumed by the built environment and energy consumed by uses that are independent of the construction of the building, such as in plug-in appliances. CaIEEMod calculates energy use from systems covered by Title 24 (e.g., HVAC system, water heating system, and lighting system); energy use from lighting; and energy use from office equipment, appliances, plug -ins, and other sources not covered by Title 24 or lighting. CaIEEMod electricity and natural gas usage rates are based on the CEC-sponsored California Commercial End -Use Survey (CEUS) and the California Residential Appliance Saturation Survey (RASS) studies." The data are specific for climate zones; therefore, Zone 11 was selected for the Project Site based on the zip code tool. 71 California Energy Commission, Commercial End -Use Survey, March 2006, and California Residential Appliance Saturation Survey, October 2010. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 51 18 — 1016 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2023 As shown in Table 9, Project GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage would result in a total of 908 MTCO2e per year. Mobile Source Emissions Mobile -source emissions were calculated using the SCAQMD-recommended CalEEMod emissions inventory model. CaIEEMod calculates the emissions associated with on -road mobile sources associated with residents, employees, visitors, and delivery vehicles visiting the Project Site based on the number of daily trips generated and VMT. Mobile source operational GHG emissions were calculated using CaIEEMod and are based on the Project's VMT analysis. The Project represents an infill development within an urbanized area that would concentrate mixed residential and commercial uses within an HQTA.72 The Project Site is in a dense mixed - use corridor with proximity to two OCTA local bus lines and the Metrolink Santa Ana station to the west. The Project would also incorporate characteristics that would reduce trips and VMT as compared to standard ITE trip generation rates. The Project characteristics listed below are consistent with the CAPCOA guidance document, Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, which provides emission reduction values for transportation related design techniques.73 These techniques would reduce vehicle trips and VMT associated with the Project relative to the standard ITE trip generation rates, which would result in a comparable reduction in VMT and associated GHG emissions. Techniques applicable to the Project include the following (a brief description of the Project's relevance to the measure is also provided): • CAPCOA Measure LUT-1 — Increase Density: Increased density, measured in terms of persons, jobs, or dwelling units per unit area, reduces emissions associated with transportation as it reduces the distance people travel for work or services and provides a foundation for the implementation of other strategies, such as enhanced transit services. • CAPCOA Measure LUT-3 — Increase Diversity of Urban and Suburban Developments (Mixed -Use): The Project would introduce new uses on the Project Site, including new residences and retail uses. The increases in land use diversity on the Project Site would reduce vehicle trips and VMT by encouraging visitors to walk and use non -automotive 72 The Project Site is also located in Transit Priority Area as defined by Public Resources Code Section 20199. Public Resources Code Section 21099 defines a "transit priority area" as an area within 0.5 miles of a major transit stop that is "existing or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Program adopted pursuant to Section 450.216 or 450.322 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations." Public Resources Code Section 21064.3 defines "major transit stop" as "a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods." Also refer to the City's ZIMAS System regarding the location of the Project Site within a Transit Priority Area.. 73 CAPCOA, Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, 2010. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 52 18 — 1017 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2021 forms of transportation (i.e., public transit, biking), which would result in corresponding reductions in transportation -related emissions. • CAPCOA Measure LUT-4 — Increase Destination Accessibility: The Project Site is in a dense corridor, which is easily accessible by public transportation. Access to multiple destinations, and commercial and retail uses in proximity to the Project Site would reduce vehicle trips and VMT compared to the statewide average and encourage walking and non -automotive forms of transportation and would result in corresponding reductions in transportation -related emissions because of the Project. • CAPCOA Measure LUT-5 — Increase Transit Accessibility: The Project would be located near two OCTA bus routes and the Metrolink Santa Ana station. The Project would also provide bicycle parking spaces to encourage utilization of alternative modes of transportation. • CAPCOA Measure LUT-9 — Improve Design of Development: The Project would enhance the pedestrian and bicycle environment through an attractive open space component and improved sidewalk and streetscape, which would enhance walkability in the Project vicinity. The Project would also locate a development with a high level of street access, which improves street accessibility and connectivity. • CAPCOA Measure SDT-2 — Traffic Calming Measures: Providing traffic calming measures encourages people to walk or bike instead of using a vehicle. This mode shift results in a decrease in VMT. Streets within a half mile of the Project Site are equipped with sidewalks, and several of the intersections include marked crosswalks and/or count- down signal timers that calm traffic. CalEEMod calculates VMT based on the type of land use, trip purpose, and trip type percentages for each land use subtype in the project (primary, diverted, and pass -by). As shown in Table 9, the Project GHG emissions from mobile sources would result in a total of 3,355 MTCO2e per year. This estimate reflects reductions attributable to the Project's characteristics (e.g., infill project near transit that supports multi -modal transportation options), as described above. Solid Waste Generation Emissions Emissions related to solid waste were calculated using the CalEEMod emissions inventory model, which multiplies an estimate of the waste generated by applicable emissions factors provided in Section 2.4 of the USEPA's AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. CalEEMod solid waste generation rates for each applicable land use were selected for this analysis. As Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 53 18 — 1018 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2121 shown in Table 9, the Project scenario is expected to result in a total of 186 MTCO2e per year from solid waste that accounts for a 50-percent recycling/diversion rate.74 Water Usaae and Wastewater Generation Emissions GHG emissions are related to the energy used to convey, treat, and distribute water, and treat wastewater. Thus, these emissions are generally indirect emissions from the production of electricity to power these systems. Three processes are necessary to supply potable water; these include (1) supply and conveyance of the water from the source; (2) treatment of the water to potable standards; and (3) distribution of the water to individual users. After use, energy is used as the wastewater is treated and reused as reclaimed water. Emissions related to water usage and wastewater generation were calculated for the Project using the CaIEEMod emissions inventory model, which multiplies an estimate of the water usage by the applicable energy intensity factor to determine the embodied energy necessary to supply potable water.75 GHG emissions are then calculated based on the amount of electricity consumed multiplied by the GHG emissions intensity factors for the utility provider. In this case, embodied energy for Southern California supplied water and GHG emissions intensity factors for SCE were selected in CaIEEMod. Water usage rates were calculated consistent with the requirements under the 2022 California Plumbing Code (which is based on the 2021 Uniform Plumbing Code), 2022 CALGreen, and reflect an approximately 20-percent reduction as compared to the base demand. As shown in Table 9, Project GHG emissions from water/wastewater usage would result in a total of 53 MTCO2e per year, which reflects a 20-percent reduction in water/wastewater emissions consistent with building code requirements as compared to the Project without sustainability features related to water conservation. Refrigerants Emissions related to cooling structures and refrigeration needs were calculated using the CaIEEMod emissions inventory model. As shown in Table 9, the Project scenario is expected to result in a total of one MTCO2e per year from use of refrigerants that used HFCs and have high GWP values. Combined Construction Emissions As shown in Table 9, when taking into consideration implementation of project design features, including the requirements set forth in the City's Green Building Code and the full implementation 74 AB 341 (2012) increased the Statewide waste diversion goal from 50 to 75 percent from baseline rates established by CalRecycle by 2020 and beyond. Further, SIB 1383 (2016) requires jurisdictions to reduce 75 percent of organic waste disposal in landfills by 2030. 75 The intensity factor reflects the average pounds of CO2e per megawatt generated by a utility company. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 54 18 — 1019 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2023 of current state mandates, the GHG emissions for the Project would equal 117 MTCO2e annually (as amortized over 30 years) during construction. Estimated Reduction of Project -Related GHG Emissions Resulting from Consistency with Plans As noted earlier, one approach to demonstrating a project's consistency with GHG plans is to show how a project will reduce its incremental contribution through a Project Without Reduction Features comparison. The analysis in this section includes potential emissions under a Project Without Reduction Features scenario and from the Project at build -out based on actions and mandates in force in 2027. As shown in Table 10, the emissions for the Project and its associated CARB 2027 Project Without Reduction Features scenario are estimated to be 4,639 and 6,721 MTCO2e per year, respectively, which shows the Project would reduce emissions by 31 percent from CARB's 2027 Project Without Reduction Features scenario. Table 10 Estimated Reduction of Project -Related GHG Emissions Resulting from Consistency with Plans Reduction from Change from Project Without As Project Without Project Without Reduction Scenario and Source Proposed Reduction Reduction Features Scenario Features Features Scenario* Scenario Scenario Area Sources 19 19 - 0% Energy Sources 1,566 908 -658 -42% Mobile Sources 4,779 3,355 -1,424 -30% Waste Sources 186 186 - 0% Water Sources 53 53 - 0% Refrigerants 1 1 - 0% Construction 117 117 - 0% Total Emissions 6,721 4,639 -2,082 -31.0% Daily construction emissions amortized over 30-year period pursuant to SCAQMD guidance. Annual construction emissions derived by taking total emissions over duration of activities and dividing by construction period. * Project Without Reduction Features scenario does not assume 30% reduction in in mobile source emissions from Pavley emission standards (19.8%), low carbon fuel standards (7.2%), vehicle efficiency measures 2.8%); does not assume 42% reduction in energy production emissions from the State's renewables portfolio standard (33%), natural gas extraction efficiency measures (1.6%), and natural gas transmission and distribution efficiency measures (7.451o). Source: DKA Planning, 2023. The analysis in this section uses the 2022 Scoping Plan's statewide goals as one approach to evaluate the Project's incremental contribution to climate change. The methodology is to compare the Project's emissions as proposed to the Project's emissions as if the Project were built using a Project Without Reduction Features approach in terms of design, methodology, and technology. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 55 18 — 1020 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2123 This means the Project's emissions were calculated as if the Project was constructed with project design features to reduce GHG emissions that are not required by state or local code and with several regulatory measures adopted in furtherance of AB 32. While the AB 32 Scoping Plan's cumulative statewide objectives were not intended to serve as the basis for project -level assessments, this analysis finds that its Project Without Reduction Features comparison based on the Scoping Plan is appropriate, because the Project would contribute to statewide GHG emissions reduction goals. Specifically, the Project's mixed -use nature and location in an existing urban setting provide opportunities to reduce transportation - related emissions. First, it would capture vehicle travel on -site that would have normally been destined for off -site locations. This produces substantial reductions in the amount of vehicle trips and VMT that no longer are made. Second, it would eliminate many vehicle trips, because travel to and from the Project Site could be captured by public transit and active transportation instead. Finally, it would attract existing trips on the street network that would divert to the proposed development. Post-2030 Analysis Recent studies show that the state's existing and proposed regulatory framework will put the state on a pathway to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 if additional appropriate reduction measures are adopted.76 Even though these studies did not provide an exact regulatory and technological roadmap to achieve the 2030 and 2050 goals, they demonstrated that various combinations of policies could allow the statewide emissions level to remain very low through 2050, suggesting that the combination of new technologies and other regulations not analyzed in the studies could allow the state to meet the 2050 target. After the findings of these studies, SIB 32 was passed on September 8, 2016, and would require the state board to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 40 percent below the 1990 level by 2030. As discussed above, the new plan, outlined in SIB 32, involves increasing renewable energy use, imposing tighter limits on the carbon content of gasoline and diesel fuel, putting more electric cars on the road, improving energy efficiency, and curbing emissions from key industries. As discussed above, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS establishes a regulatory framework for achieving GHG reductions from the land use and transportation sectors pursuant to SB 375 and 76 Energy and Environmental Economics (E3). "Summary of the California State Agencies' PATHWAYS Project: Long-term Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scenarios" (April 2015); Greenblatt, Jeffrey, Energy Policy, "Modeling California Impacts on Greenhouse Gas Emissions" (Vol. 78, pp. 158-172). The California Air Resources Board, California Energy Commission, California Public Utilities Commission, and the California Independent System Operator engaged E3 to evaluate the feasibility and cost of a range of potential 2030 targets along the way to the state's goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. With input from the agencies, E3 developed scenarios that explore the potential pace at which emission reductions can be achieved, as well as the mix of technologies and practices deployed. E3 conducted the analysis using its California PATHWAYS model. Enhanced specifically for this study, the model encompasses the entire California economy with detailed representations of the buildings, industry, transportation, and electricity sectors. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 56 18 — 1021 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 2023 the state's long-term climate policies. The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS ensures VMT reductions and other measures that reduce regional emissions from the land use and transportation sectors. The Project is the type of land use development that is encouraged by the RTP/SCS to reduce VMT and expand multi -modal transportation options for the region to achieve the GHG reductions from the land use and transportation sectors required by SB 375, which, in turn, advances the state's long-term climate policies. By furthering implementation of SB 375, the Project supports regional land use and transportation GHG reductions consistent with state climate targets for 2020 and beyond. In addition, the Project would be consistent with the Actions and Strategies set forth in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Conclusion Given the Project's consistency with state, SCAG, and City GHG emissions reduction goals and objectives, the Project is consistent with applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. In the absence of adopted standards and established significance thresholds, and given this consistency, it is concluded that the Project's incremental contribution to GHG emissions and their effects on climate change would not be cumulatively considerable. Cabrillo Town Center PAGE 57 18 — 1022 City of Santa Ana 10/3/20 zozs TECHNICAL APPENDIX City Council 18 — 1023 10/3/2023 DOUGLASKIM+ASSOCIATES, LLC GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS OVERVIEW City Council 18 — 1024 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center Project GHG Emissions Impact Compared to "Project Without Reduction Features" Scenario Project Without Reduction Features Source (2027) Area 19 Reduction Without As Proposed (2027) 19 from Project Change from Project Reduction Without Reduction Features Features Scenario 0% Energy 1,566 908 (658) -42% Mobile 4,779 3,355 (1,424) -30% Waste 186 186 0°% Water 53 53 0% Refrigerants 1 1 0% Construction 117 117 0% Total Emissions 6,721 4,639 (2,082)-31.0°% Mobile Source Emissions Pavley emission standards (19.8%reduction) Low carbon fuel standard (7.2%reduction) Vehicle efficiency measures (2.8%reduction) Energy Production Assumptions Natural gas transmission and distribution efficiency measures (7.4%reduction) Natural gas extraction efficiency measures (1.6%reduction) Renewables (electricity) portfolio standard (33%reduction) City Council 18 — 1025 10/3/2023 DOUGLASKIM+ASSOCIATES, LLC EXISTING EMISSIONS City Council 18 — 1026 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source City Council 18 — 1027 10/3/2023 1 / 25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.3.2. Unmitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated City Council 18 — 1028 2/25 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5. Activity Data 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment City Council 18 — 1029 3/25 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures City Council 18 — 1030 4/25 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores 7.4. Health & Equity Measures 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures 8. User Changes to Default Data City Council 18 — 1031 5/25 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Project Name Operational Year Lead Agency Land Use Scale Analysis Level for Defaults Windspeed (m/s) Precipitation (days) Location County City Air District Air Basin TAZ EDFZ Electric Utility Gas Utility App Version 1.2. Land Use Types Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) 2023 City of Santa Ana Project/site County 2.50 WWI 1901 E 4th St, Santa Ana, CA 92705, USA Orange Santa Ana South Coast AQMD South Coast 5962 7 Southern California Edison Southern California Gas 2022.1.1.14 General Office 173 1000sgft 8.97 173,025 0.00 — — — Building City Council 18 — 1032 10/3/2023 6/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected 2. Emissions Summary 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (Ib/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) Unmit. 146 19,778 19,924 15.8 0.76 67.6 20,613 Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — U n mit. 146 19,151 19,297 15.9 0.79 2.16 19,931 Average Daily (Max) — — — — — U n mit. 146 19,333 19,479 15.9 0.79 29.4 20,141 Annual (Max) — — — — — — — Unmit. 24.1 3,201 3,225 2.62 0.13 4.87 3,335 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Mobile — 15,197 15,197 0.69 0.58 67.2 15,453 Area — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.1 Energy — 4,351 4,351 0.40 0.04 — 4,372 Water 58.9 200 259 6.06 0.15 — 454 Waste 86.7 0.00 86.7 8.67 0.00 — 303 Retrig. City Council — — 18 — 1033 — 42 10/3/2012 7/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total 146 19,778 19,924 15.8 0.76 67.6 20,613 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - Mobile - 14,601 14,601 0.72 0.61 1.74 14,801 Area - - - - - - - Energy - 4,351 4,351 0.40 0.04 - 4,372 Water 58.9 200 259 6.06 0.15 - 454 Waste 86.7 0.00 86.7 8.67 0.00 - 303 Refrig. - - - - - 0.42 0.42 Total 146 19,151 19,297 15.9 0.79 2.16 19,931 Average Daily - - - - - - - Mobile - 14,762 14,762 0.72 0.61 29.0 14,990 Area - 21.2 21.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 21.3 Energy - 4,351 4,351 0.40 0.04 - 4,372 Water 58.9 200 259 6.06 0.15 - 454 Waste 86.7 0.00 86.7 8.67 0.00 - 303 Refrig. - - - - - 0.42 0.42 Total 146 19,333 19,479 15.9 0.79 29.4 20,141 Annual - - - - - - - Mobile - 2,444 2,444 0.12 0.10 4.80 2,482 Area - 3.51 3.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.52 Energy - 720 720 0.07 0.01 - 724 Water 9.76 33.1 42.9 1.00 0.02 - 75.1 Waste 14.4 0.00 14.4 1.44 0.00 - 50.2 Refrig. - - - - - 0.07 0.07 Total 24.1 3,201 3,225 2.62 0.13 4.87 3,335 4. Operations Emissions -seta s- City Council 18 - 1034 10/3/2023 8/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available. 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) General Office Building — 2,945 2,945 0.28 0.03 — 2,962 Total — 2,945 2,945 0.28 0.03 — 2,962 Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — General Office Building — 2,945 2,945 0.28 0.03 — 2,962 Total — 2,945 2,945 0.28 0.03 — 2,962 Annual — — — — — — — General Office Building — 488 488 0.05 0.01 — 490 Total — 488 488 0.05 0.01 — 490 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (Ib/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — General Office Building — 1,406 1,406 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,409 Total — 1,406 1,406 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,409 Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — General Office Buildi'City Council 1,406 1,406 18 — 1035 -12 <0.005 — 10/3/20M09 9/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total — 1,406 1,406 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,409 Annual — — — General Office Building — 233 233 0.02 < 0.005 — 233 Total — 233 233 0.02 < 0.005 — 233 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) Consumer Products Architectural Coatings Landscape Equipment — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.1 Total — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.1 Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Consumer Products — — — — — — — Architectural Coatings — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — Consumer Products — — — — — — — Architectural Coatings — — — — — — — Landscape Equipment — 3.51 3.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.52 Total — 3.51 3.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.52 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use City Council 18 — 1036 10/3/2023 10/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.4.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) General Office Building 58.9 200 259 6.06 0.15 - 454 Total 58.9 200 259 6.06 0.15 - 454 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - General Office Building 58.9 200 259 6.06 0.15 - 454 Total 58.9 200 259 6.06 0.15 - 454 Annual - - - - - General Office Building 9.76 33.1 42.9 1.00 0.02 - 75.1 Total 9.76 33.1 42.9 1.00 0.02 - 75.1 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for daily. MT/vr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - General Office Building 86.7 0.00 86.7 8.67 0.00 - 303 Total 86.7 0.00 86.7 8.67 0.00 - 303 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - General Office Building 86.7 0.00 86.7 8.67 0.00 - 303 Total 86.7 0.00 86.7 8.67 0.00 - 303 Annual - - - - - General Office Building 14.4 0.00 14.4 1.44 0.00 - 50.2 Total Cit�'Uouncil 0.00 14.4 18 - 10371.44 0.00 - 10/3/2OA2 11 / 25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) General Office Building — — — — — 0.42 0.42 Total — — — — — 0.42 0.42 Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — General Office Building — — — — — 0.42 0.42 Total — — — — — 0.42 0.42 Annual — — — — — — — General Office Building — — — — — 0.07 0.07 Total — — — — — 0.07 0.07 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — City Council 18 — 1038 10/3/2023 12/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — Total — — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated City Council 18 — 1039 10/3/2023 13/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — Annual — — — Total — — — — — — — 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Avoided — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — Sequestered — — — — — — — Subtotal City Council — — 18 — 1040 — — 10/3/20Z3 14/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Removed Subtotal Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequestered Subtotal Removed Subtotal Annual — — — — — — — Avoided — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — Sequestered — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — Removed — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — 5. Activity Data 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated Total all Land Uses ,847,400 City Council 18 1041 10/3/2023 15/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings C 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Snow Days Summer Days e �� day/yr day/yr 259,538 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) General Office Building 3,083,355 349 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 86,513 0.00 250 0.0330 0.0040 4,385,573 General Office BuildiQity Council 30,752,382 18 — 1042 0.00 10/3/2023 16/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated General Office Building 161 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated General Office Building Household refrigerators R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00 and/or freezers General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 and heat pumps 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers Equipment Type !iz I Type Number !Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Input (MMBtu/yr) Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100. Climate Hazard Result for Project • Temperature and Ex tle ounCil 18 — 1044 annual ays o extreme ea 10/3/2023 18/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Extreme Precipitation 3.50 Sea Level Rise 0.00 Wildfire 1.31 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm meters of inundation depth annual hectares burned Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about 3/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft. Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat 0 0 0 N/A Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 0 0 0 N/A Wildfire 0 0 0 N/A Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.3. Adjusted Climate Rick Scores City Council 18 — 1045 10/3/2023 19/25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Temperature and Extreme Heat Extreme Precipitation Sea Level Rise Wildfire Flooding Drought Snowpack Reduction Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 I 1 VA The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state • - . • - . - Exposure Indicators — AQ-Ozone 57.8 AQ-PM 73.8 AQ-DPM 85.3 Drinking Water 53.8 Lead Risk Housing 71.1 Pesticides A.99 City Council 18 — 1046 10/3/2023 20 / 25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Toxic Releases 90.8 Traffic 98.3 Effect Indicators — CleanUp Sites 91.8 Groundwater 0.00 Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 82.8 Impaired Water Bodies 0.00 Solid Waste 22.1 Sensitive Population — Asthma 55.8 Cardio-vascular 47.8 Low Birth Weights 41.7 Socioeconomic Factor Indicators — Education 75.4 Housing 48.1 Linguistic 66.9 Poverty 54.4 Unemployment 28.2 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. Economic Above Poverty Employed Median HI Education 55.40870012 82.72808931 52.89362248 City Council 18 — 1047 21 / 25 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Bachelor's or higher 35.41639933 High school enrollment 100 Preschool enrollment 31.82343128 Transportation — Auto Access 58.09059412 Active commuting 62.68446041 Social — 2-parent households 93.16052868 Voting 23.85474143 Neighborhood — Alcohol availability 53.74053638 Park access 48.29975619 Retail density 98.84511741 Supermarket access 72.33414603 Tree canopy 38.34210189 Housing — Homeownership 37.89298088 Housing habitability 43.38508918 Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 27.93532658 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 78.69883229 Uncrowded housing 20.37726165 Health Outcomes — Insured adults 24.71448736 Arthritis 67.1 Asthma ER Admissions 50.7 High Blood Pressure 72.3 Cancer (excluding skin) 55 n City Council 18 — 1048 10/3/2023 22 / 25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Asthma 49.0 Coronary Heart Disease 61.0 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 53.7 Diagnosed Diabetes 54.0 Life Expectancy at Birth 67.7 Cognitively Disabled 95.5 Physically Disabled 83.0 Heart Attack ER Admissions 78.0 Mental Health Not Good 41.5 Chronic Kidney Disease 45.1 Obesity 51.8 Pedestrian Injuries 60.5 Physical Health Not Good 44.3 Stroke 58.2 Health Risk Behaviors — Binge Drinking 15.4 Current Smoker 44.4 No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 40.3 Climate Change Exposures — Wildfire Risk 0.0 SLR Inundation Area 0.0 Children 64.0 Elderly 60.7 English Speaking 29.3 Foreign -born 72.2 Outdoor Workers 33.6 Climate Change Adaptive Cap;;Htg — City Council 18 — 1049 10/3/2023 23 / 25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Impervious Surface Cover 46.9 Traffic Density 99.3 Traffic Access 23.0 Other Indices — Hardship 66.1 Other Decision Support — 2016 Voting 58.2 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 71.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 57.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 7.4. Health & Equity Measures No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data City Council 18 Wr 10/3/2023 24 / 25 Cabrillo Town Center (Existing) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Land Use Project plan City Council 18 — 1051 25 / 25 10/3/2023 D0UGLAsKim+Ass0cIATES,LLC FUTURE EMISSIONS City Council 18 — 1052 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated 3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated 3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 3.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated City Council 18 — 1053 10/3/2023 1 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated 3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated 3.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated 3.15. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated 3.17. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated 3.19. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use City Council 18 — 1054 2/50 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated City Council 18 — 1055 10/3/2023 3/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies 5.5. Architectural Coatings 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies 5.7. Construction Paving 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment City Council 18 — 1056 4/50 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated City Council 18 — 1057 5/50 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores 7.4. Health & Equity Measures 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures 8. User Changes to Default Data City Council 18 — 1058 6/50 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Project Name Construction Start Date Operational Year Lead Agency Land Use Scale Analysis Level for Defaults Windspeed (m/s) Precipitation (days) Location County City Air District Air Basin TAZ EDFZ Electric Utility Gas Utility App Version 1.2. Land Use Types SubtypeLand Use Size ItV Council Cabrillo Town Center (Future) 9/2/2024 2027 City of Santa Ana Project/site County 2.50 1901 E 4th St, Santa Ana, CA 92705, USA Orange Santa Ana South Coast AQMD South Coast 5962 7 Southern California Edison Southern California Gas 2022.1.1.14 7/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Apartments Mid Rise 449 Dwelling Unit 11.8 839,447 8,000 — 2,066 — Strip Mall 5.80 1000sgft 0.13 5,800 500 — — — Enclosed Parking 898 Space 8.08 312,051 0.00 — — — with Elevator Parking Lot 11.0 Space 0.10 0.00 0.00 — — — Enclosed Parking 116 Space 1.04 46,400 0.00 — — — Structure General Office 11.4 1000sgft 0.26 11,400 500 — — — Building Condo/Townhouse 58.0 Dwelling Unit 3.63 150,530 1,000 — 267 — 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — U n mit. — 14,100 14,100 0.45 0.80 36.2 14,382 Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Unmit. — 12,673 12,673 0.45 0.78 0.94 12,916 Average Daily (Max) — — — — — — — Unmit. — 8,982 8,982 0.26 0.56 10.2 9,165 Annual (Max) — — — — — — — Unmit. — 1,487 1,487 0.04 0.09 1.68 1,517 City Council 18 — 1060 10/3/2023 8/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily - Summer (Max) 2024 - 7,496 7,496 0.45 0.65 8.91 7,709 2025 - 13,006 13,006 0.38 0.78 36.2 13,284 2026 - 12,814 12,814 0.36 0.78 33.0 13,088 2027 - 14,100 14,100 0.37 0.80 33.9 14,382 Daily - Winter (Max) - - - - - - - 2024 - 7,523 7,523 0.45 0.65 0.23 7,693 2025 - 12,673 12,673 0.40 0.78 0.94 12,916 2026 - 12,488 12,488 0.37 0.78 0.85 12,730 2027 - 12,312 12,312 0.36 0.75 0.77 12,546 Average Daily - - - - - - - 2024 - 1,737 1,737 0.09 0.09 0.55 1,767 2025 - 4,590 4,590 0.15 0.24 4.79 4,670 2026 - 8,982 8,982 0.26 0.56 10.2 9,165 2027 - 5,568 5,568 0.15 0.33 5.87 5,675 Annual - - - - - - - 2024 - 288 288 0.01 0.02 0.09 293 2025 - 760 760 0.02 0.04 0.79 773 2026 - 1,487 1,487 0.04 0.09 1.68 1,517 2027 - 922 922 0.03 0.05 0.97 940 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutan , City Council 1 - 1061 10/3/2023 9/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) U n mit. 362 26,509 26,871 37.7 0.91 71.7 28,155 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - U n mit. 362 25,575 25,937 37.7 0.94 8.83 27,169 Average Daily (Max) - - - - - - - Unmit. 362 25,690 26,052 37.7 0.94 35.0 27,311 Annual (Max) - - - - - - - Unmit. 60.0 4,253 4,313 6.24 0.16 5.80 4,522 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Mobile - 20,555 20,555 0.86 0.76 64.5 20,868 Area 0.00 355 355 0.01 < 0.005 - 355 Energy - 5,459 5,459 0.51 0.04 - 5,485 Water 41.2 139 181 4.23 0.10 - 317 Waste 321 0.00 321 32.1 0.00 - 1,123 Refrig. - - - - - 7.15 7.15 Total 362 26,509 26,871 37.7 0.91 71.7 28,155 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Mobile - 19,765 19,765 0.89 0.80 1.67 20,026 Area 0.00 211 211 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 211 Energy - 5,459 5,459 0.51 0.04 - 5,485 Water 41.2 139 181 4.23 0.10 - 317 Waste Cit�26ouncil 0.00 321 18 - 106232.1 0.00 - 10/3/20L,�23 10/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Refrig. - - - - - 7.15 7.15 Total 362 25,575 25,937 37.7 0.94 8.83 27,169 Average Daily - - - - - - - Mobile - 19,978 19,978 0.88 0.80 27.8 20,266 Area 0.00 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 113 Energy - 5,459 5,459 0.51 0.04 - 5,485 Water 41.2 139 181 4.23 0.10 - 317 Waste 321 0.00 321 32.1 0.00 - 1,123 Refrig. - - - - - 7.15 7.15 Total 362 25,690 26,052 37.7 0.94 35.0 27,311 Annual - - - - - - - Mobile - 3,308 3,308 0.15 0.13 4.61 3,355 Area 0.00 18.7 18.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 18.8 Energy - 904 904 0.08 0.01 - 908 Water 6.82 23.1 29.9 0.70 0.02 - 52.5 Waste 53.1 0.00 53.1 5.31 0.00 - 186 Refrig. - - - - - 1.18 1.18 Total 60.0 4,253 4,313 6.24 0.16 5.80 4,522 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily, ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Onsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment City Council 3,425 3,425 18 - 10630.14 0.03 - 10/3/20C137 11 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Demolition Onsite truck Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road Equipment Demolition Onsite truck Average Daily Off -Road Equipment Demolition Onsite truck Annual Off -Road Equipment Demolition Onsite truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max Worker Vendor Hauling Daily, Winter (Max) Worker Vendor Hauling Average Daily Worker Vendor Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 - 3,437 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 413 413 0.02 < 0.005 - 414 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 68.4 68.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 68.6 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 203 203 < 0.005 0.01 0.83 206 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3,867 3,867 0.31 0.62 8.08 4,066 - 193 193 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 196 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3,868 3,868 0.31 0.62 0.21 4,060 - 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 24.0 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 46R 46R n n4 n 07 n 4P 4an City Council 18 - 1064 10/3/2023 12/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Annual - - - - - - - Worker - 3.91 3.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.97 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 77.2 77.2 0.01 0.01 0.07 81.1 3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Onsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 - 5,314 Dust From Material - - - - - - - Movement Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 72.5 72.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 72.8 Dust From Material - - - - - - - Movement Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 12.0 12.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 12.1 Dust From Material - - - - - - - Movement Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Daily, winter (Max) City Council 18 - 1065 10/3/2023 13/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Worker - 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 2,002 2,002 0.16 0.32 0.11 2,101 Average Daily - - - - - - - Worker - 3.13 3.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.18 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 27.4 27.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 28.8 Annual - - - - - - - Worker - 0.52 0.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.53 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 4.54 4.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.77 3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 - 6,621 Dust From Material - - - - - - - Movement Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 697 697 0.03 0.01 - 700 Dust From Material - - - - - - - Movement Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual City --Council - - 18 - 1066- - - 10/3/202-3 14/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road Equipment - 115 115 < 0.005 Dust From Material - - - - Movement Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - Daily, Winter (Max) - - Worker - 258 258 < 0.005 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 58.2 58.2 < 0.005 Average Daily - - - - Worker - 27.6 27.6 < 0.005 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 6.15 6.15 < 0.005 Annual - - - - Worker - 4.57 4.57 < 0.005 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 1.02 1.02 < 0.005 3.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) < 0.005 - 116 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 261 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 61.1 < 0.005 0.05 28.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 0.01 6.46 < 0.005 0.01 4.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.07 Onsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 - 6,622 Dust From Material - - - - - - - Movement City Council 18 - 1067 10/3/2023 15/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 400 400 0.02 Dust From Material - - - - Movement Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - Off -Road Equipment - 66.3 66.3 < 0.005 Dust From Material - - - - Movement Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - Worker - 253 253 < 0.005 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 57.2 57.2 < 0.005 Average Daily - - - - Worker - 15.5 15.5 < 0.005 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 3.47 3.47 < 0.005 Annual - - - - Worker - 2.57 2.57 < 0.005 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria PollutantCob/dg�afurildaily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dI# 40086k, MT/yr for annual) 16/50 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 - 402 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 - 66.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 256 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 60.1 < 0.005 0.03 15.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite Daily, Summer (Max Off -Road Equipment Onsite truck Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road Equipment Onsite truck Average Daily Off -Road Equipment Onsite truck Annual Off -Road Equipment Onsite truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max Worker Vendor Hauling Daily, Winter (Max) Worker Vendor Hauling Average Daily Worker Vendor Hauling - 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 - 2,406 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 - 2,406 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 718 718 0.03 0.01 - 720 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 119 119 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 119 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 6,917 6,917 0.08 0.25 26.2 7,019 - 3,691 3,691 0.21 0.51 10.1 3,859 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 6,583 6,583 0.09 0.25 0.68 6,659 - 3,693 3,693 0.21 0.51 0.26 3,851 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 1,998 1,998 0.03 0.07 3.39 2,024 - 1,105 1,105 0.06 0.15 1.30 1,154 City Council 18 - 1069 10/3/2023 17/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Annual - - - - - - - Worker - 331 331 < 0.005 0.01 0.56 335 Vendor - 183 183 0.01 0.03 0.22 191 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Onsite - Daily, Summer (Max) - Off -Road Equipment - Onsite truck - Daily, Winter (Max) - Off -Road Equipment - Onsite truck - Average Daily - Off -Road Equipment - Onsite truck - Annual - Off -Road Equipment - Onsite truck - Offsite - Daily, Summer (Max) - Worker - Vendor - Hauling - 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 - 2,405 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 - 2,405 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 - 1,718 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 - 284 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,785 6,785 0.08 0.25 23.6 6,885 3,631 3,631 0.18 0.51 9.38 3,798 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) City Council - - 18 - 1070- - - 10/3/2023 18/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Worker - 6,458 6,458 0.09 0.25 0.61 6,534 Vendor - 3,633 3,633 0.18 0.51 0.24 3,790 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - Worker - 4,676 4,676 0.07 0.18 7.27 4,737 Vendor - 2,594 2,594 0.13 0.37 2.90 2,709 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Worker - 774 774 0.01 0.03 1.20 784 Vendor - 429 429 0.02 0.06 0.48 449 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 - 2,405 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 - 2,405 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 994 994 0.04 0.01 - 998 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment City Council 165 165 18 - 1071 0.01` 5 10/3/20ff 19/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Worker - 6,671 6,671 0.07 0.25 21.2 6,768 Vendor - 3,564 3,564 0.18 0.49 8.52 3,722 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Worker - 6,349 6,349 0.08 0.25 0.55 6,425 Vendor - 3,566 3,566 0.18 0.49 0.22 3,715 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - Worker - 2,670 2,670 0.03 0.10 3.80 2,705 Vendor - 1,479 1,479 0.07 0.20 1.52 1,542 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Worker - 442 442 0.01 0.02 0.63 448 Vendor - 245 245 0.01 0.03 0.25 255 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.15. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 - 1,517 Paving - - - - - - - Onsite truck City Council 0.00 0.0018 - 1070.00 10/3/20HO 20 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Average Daily Off -Road Equipment - 273 273 0.01 < 0.005 - 274 Paving - - - - - - - Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 45.2 45.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 45.4 Paving - - - - - - - Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Worker - 199 199 < 0.005 0.01 0.75 202 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Average Daily - - - - - - - Worker - 34.7 34.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 35.2 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Worker - 5.75 5.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.83 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.17. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 21 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite - Daily, Summer (Max) - Off -Road Equipment - Architectural Coatings - Onsite truck - Daily, Winter (Max) - Average Daily - Off -Road Equipment - Architectural Coatings - Onsite truck - Annual - Off -Road Equipment - Architectural Coatings - Onsite truck - Offsite - Daily, Summer (Max) - Worker - Vendor - Hauling - Daily, Winter (Max) - A D1 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 - 134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.9 39.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 40.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.60 6.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 6.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,334 1,334 0.01 0.05 4.23 1,354 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 verage ai y - - - - - - - Worker - 384 384 < 0.005 0.01 0.55 389 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Worker - 63.6 63.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 64.5 Vendor - n nn n nn n nn n on n no n no City Council 18 - 1074 10/3/2023 22 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.19. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Onsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 207 207 0.01 < 0.005 - 208 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 207 207 0.01 < 0.005 - 208 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 35.8 35.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 35.9 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Off -Road Equipment - 5.93 5.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 5.95 Onsite truck - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Worker - 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - Worker - 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling City Council 0.00 0.0018 - 107 "0000 00 10/3/20HO 23 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Average Daily Worker - 5.53 5.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.60 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - Worker - 0.91 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.93 Vendor - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available. 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) - Apartments Mid Rise - Strip Mall - Enclosed Parking with - Elevator Parking Lot - Enclosed Parking - Structure City Council 1,561 1,561 0.15 0.02 - 1,570 54.0 54.0 0.01 < 0.005 - 54.3 1,093 1,093 0.10 0.01 - 1,099 3.58 3.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.60 154 154 0.01 < 0.005 - 155 18 - 1076 24/50 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office Building - 193 193 0.02 < 0.005 - 194 Condo/Townhouse - 253 253 0.02 < 0.005 - 254 Total - 3,311 3,311 0.32 0.04 - 3,330 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Apartments Mid Rise - 1,561 1,561 0.15 0.02 - 1,570 Strip Mall - 54.0 54.0 0.01 < 0.005 - 54.3 Enclosed Parking with - 1,093 1,093 0.10 0.01 - 1,099 Elevator Parking Lot - 3.58 3.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.60 Enclosed Parking - 154 154 0.01 < 0.005 - 155 Structure General Office Building - 193 193 0.02 < 0.005 - 194 Condo/Townhouse - 253 253 0.02 < 0.005 - 254 Total - 3,311 3,311 0.32 0.04 - 3,330 Annual - - - - - - - Apartments Mid Rise - 258 258 0.02 < 0.005 - 260 Strip Mall - 8.95 8.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.00 Enclosed Parking with - 181 181 0.02 < 0.005 - 182 Elevator Parking Lot - 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.60 Enclosed Parking - 25.5 25.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.7 Structure General Office Building - 31.9 31.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 32.1 Condo/Townhouse - 41.8 41.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 42.1 Total - 548 548 0.05 0.01 - 551 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) - • 18 - 10I- M • 25 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) Apartments Mid Rise - 1,598 1,598 0.14 < 0.005 - 1,603 Strip Mall - 11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 11.2 Enclosed Parking with - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed Parking - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Structure General Office Building - 92.6 92.6 0.01 < 0.005 - 92.9 Condo/Townhouse - 447 447 0.04 < 0.005 - 448 Total - 2,149 2,149 0.19 < 0.005 - 2,155 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Apartments Mid Rise - 1,598 1,598 0.14 <0.005 - 1,603 Strip Mall - 11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 11.2 Enclosed Parking with - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed Parking - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Structure General Office Building - 92.6 92.6 0.01 < 0.005 - 92.9 Condo/Townhouse - 447 447 0.04 < 0.005 - 448 Total - 2,149 2,149 0.19 < 0.005 - 2,155 Annual - - - - - - - Apartments Mid Rise - 265 265 0.02 < 0.005 - 265 Strip Mall - 1.84 1.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.85 Enclosed Parking with - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed Parking 0.90 9.99 9.99 9.09 0.90 Structure City Council 18 - 1078 10/3/2023 26 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office Building — 15.3 15.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.4 Condo/Townhouse — 74.0 74.0 0.01 < 0.005 — 74.2 Total — 356 356 0.03 < 0.005 — 357 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Hearths 0.00 211 211 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 211 Consumer Products — — — — — — — Architectural Coatings — — — — — — — Landscape Equipment — 144 144 0.01 < 0.005 — 145 Total 0.00 355 355 0.01 < 0.005 — 355 Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — Hearths 0.00 211 211 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 211 Consumer Products — — — — — — — Architectural Coatings — — — — — — — Total 0.00 211 211 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 211 Annual — — — — — — — Hearths 0.00 2.39 2.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.39 Consumer Products — — — — — — — Architectural Coatings — — — — — — — Landscape Equipment — 16.3 16.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.4 Total 0.00 18.7 18.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 City Council 18 — 1079 10/3/2023 27/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) - Apartments Mid Rise 32.3 Strip Mall 0.82 Enclosed Parking with 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 Enclosed Parking 0.00 Structure General Office Building 3.88 Condo/Townhouse 4.17 Total 41.2 Daily, Winter (Max) - Apartments Mid Rise 32.3 Strip Mall 0.82 Enclosed Parking with 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 Enclosed Parking 0.00 Structure General Office Building 3.88 Condo/Townhouse 4.17 Total 41.2 Annual - Apartments Mid RiseCit�&QounCll 109 142 3.32 0.08 - 249 2.81 3.63 0.08 < 0.005 - 6.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 13.1 17.0 0.40 0.01 - 29.8 14.1 18.3 0.43 0.01 - 32.1 139 181 4.23 0.10 - 317 109 142 3.32 0.08 - 249 2.81 3.63 0.08 < 0.005 - 6.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 13.1 17.0 0.40 0.01 - 29.8 14.1 18.3 0.43 0.01 - 32.1 139 181 4.23 0.10 - 317 18.1 23.5 18 - 1 080o.55 0.01 - 1 0/3/202.32 28 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Strip Mall 0.14 0.46 0.60 0.01 < 0.005 - 1.05 Enclosed Parking with 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Structure General Office Building 0.64 2.17 2.81 0.07 < 0.005 - 4.94 Condo/Townhouse 0.69 2.34 3.03 0.07 < 0.005 - 5.32 Total 6.82 23.1 29.9 0.70 0.02 - 52.5 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Apartments Mid Rise 276 0.00 276 27.6 0.00 - 967 Strip Mall 3.28 0.00 3.28 0.33 0.00 - 11.5 Enclosed Parking with 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Structure General Office Building 5.71 0.00 5.71 0.57 0.00 - 20.0 Condo/Townhouse 35.7 0.00 35.7 3.57 0.00 - 125 Total 321 0.00 321 32.1 0.00 - 1,123 Daily, Winter (Max) - - - - - - - Apartments Mid Rise 276 0.00 276 27.6 0.00 - 967 Strip Mall Cit�-Council 0.00 3.28 18 - 10810.33 0.00 - 10/3/20�Y 29 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Enclosed Parking with 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Structure General Office Building 5.71 0.00 5.71 0.57 0.00 - 20.0 Condo/Townhouse 35.7 0.00 35.7 3.57 0.00 - 125 Total 321 0.00 321 32.1 0.00 - 1,123 Annual - - - - - - - Apartments Mid Rise 45.7 0.00 45.7 4.57 0.00 - 160 Strip Mall 0.54 0.00 0.54 0.05 0.00 - 1.90 Enclosed Parking with 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Elevator Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Enclosed Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Structure General Office Building 0.95 0.00 0.95 0.09 0.00 - 3.31 Condo/Townhouse 5.91 0.00 5.91 0.59 0.00 - 20.7 Total 53.1 0.00 53.1 5.31 0.00 - 186 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) - - - - - - - Apartments Mid Rise - - - - - 6.01 6.01 Strip Mall - - - - - 0.04 0.04 General Office Buildir@itTCOuncil - - 18 - 1082- - 0.03 10/3/202-83 30 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Condo/Townhouse — — — — — 1.08 1.08 Total — — — — — 7.15 7.15 Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Apartments Mid Rise — — — — — 6.01 6.01 Strip Mall — — — — — 0.04 0.04 General Office Building — — — — — 0.03 0.03 Condo/Townhouse — — — — — 1.08 1.08 Total — — — — — 7.15 7.15 Annual — — — — — — — Apartments Mid Rise — — — — — 1.00 1.00 Strip Mall — — — — — 0.01 0.01 General Office Building — — — — — <0.005 <0.005 Condo/Townhouse — — — — — 0.18 0.18 Total — — — — — 1.18 1.18 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) Total Daily, Winter (Max) Total Annual Total City Council 18 — 1083 10/3/2023 31 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated City Council 18 — 1084 10/3/2023 32 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — Total — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — Total — — — — Annual — — Total — — — — 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv, ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (Ib/dav for dailv, MT/vr for ann Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — Total — — — — Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — Total — — — — Annual — — — — Total — — — — 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — Avoided — — — — Subtotal — — — — Sequestered — — — — Subtotal City Council — — 18 — 1085 33 / 50 10/3/20Z3 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Removed Subtotal Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequestered Subtotal Removed Subtotal Annual — — — — — Avoided — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — Sequestered — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — Removed — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule Demolition Demolition 9/2/2024 10/31 /2024 5.00 44.0 Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/1/2024 11/7/2024 5.00 5.00 — Grading City C6rOlArdl 11/8/2024 1fB/202P086 5.00 61.0 10/3/2023 34/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Building Construction Building Construction Paving Paving Architectural Coating Architectural Coating Trenching Trenching 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Demolition Excavators Diesel Demolition Concrete/Industrial Diesel Saws Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Grading Graders Diesel Grading Excavators Diesel Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Grading Scrapers Diesel Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Building Construction Cranes Diesel Building Construction Welders Diesel Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Paving CitT G&D9 ncil Diesel 8/1 /2025 7/31 /2027 5.00 521 - 5/1 /2025 7/31 /2025 5.00 66.0 - 5/1 /2027 9/30/2027 5.00 109 - 2/3/2025 4/30/2025 5.00 63.0 - Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48 Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Average 18 - 10872.00 8.00 81.0 10/3/202.32 35 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Trenching Trenchers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 40.0 0.50 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated Demolition - - - - Demolition Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Demolition Vendor - 10.2 HHDTMHDT Demolition Hauling 54.5 20.0 HHDT Demolition Onsite truck - - HHDT Site Preparation - - - Site Preparation Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Site Preparation Vendor - 10.2 HHDTMHDT Site Preparation Hauling 28.2 20.0 HHDT Site Preparation Onsite truck - - HHDT Grading - - - - Grading Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Grading Vendor - 10.2 HHDTMHDT Grading Hauling 0.82 20.0 HHDT Grading Onsite truck - - HHDT Building Construction - - - - Building Construction Worker 521 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Building Construction; fendeF i 46 49.2 19T"ql 19T City Council 18 - 1088 10/3/2023 36 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT Paving — — — — Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDTMHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT Architectural Coating — — — — Architectural Coating Worker 104 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDTMHDT Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT Trenching — — — — Trenching Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDTI,LDT2 Trenching Vendor — 10.2 HHDTMHDT Trenching Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Trenching Onsite truck — — HHDT 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.5. Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 2,004,703 668,234 43,689 10,588 24,110 City Council 18 — 1089 10/3/2023 37/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,000 Site Preparation — 1,422 7.50 0.00 Grading — 400 183 0.00 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies Water Exposed Area 2 61 % 61 % Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36% 5.7. Construction Paving Es1PA PavedAsphalt Apartments Mid Rise — 0% Strip Mall 0.00 0% Enclosed Parking with Elevator 8.08 100% Parking Lot 0.10 100% Enclosed Parking Structure 1.04 100% General Office Building 0.00 0% Condo/Townhouse — 0% 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors City Council 18 — 1090 10/3/2023 38 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh 2024 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005 2025 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005 2026 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005 2027 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated Total all Land Uses 2,751 2,751 2,751 1,004,115 27,510 27,510 27,510 10,041,150 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated Hearth .- Unmitigated (number) Apartments Mid Rise — Wood Fireplaces 0 Gas Fireplaces 10 Propane Fireplaces 0 Electric Fireplaces 0 No Fireplaces 439 Conventional Wood Stoves 0 Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Non -Catalytic Wood QtysCouncil 18 — 10910 10/3/2023 39 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Pellet Wood Stoves Condo/Townhouse Wood Fireplaces Gas Fireplaces Propane Fireplaces Electric Fireplaces No Fireplaces Conventional Wood Stoves Catalytic Wood Stoves Non -Catalytic Wood Stoves Pellet Wood Stoves 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 2004703.4249999998 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Snow Days Summer Days 668,234 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 43,689 10,588 day/yr 0.00 day/yr 250 24,110 Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) 10/3/2023 40 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Apartments Mid Rise 1,645,960 346 0.0330 0.0040 4,986,972 Strip Mall 56,964 346 0.0330 0.0040 34,724 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1,151,915 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Parking Lot 3,778 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Enclosed Parking Structure 162,466 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 General Office Building 203,151 346 0.0330 0.0040 288,950 Condo/Townhouse 266,346 346 0.0330 0.0040 1,393,761 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated Apartments Mid Rise 16,849,017 126,724 Strip Mall 429,621 6,480 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 General Office Building 2,026,165 6,480 Condo/Townhouse 2,176,488 15,840 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated Apartments Mid Rise 513 — Strip Mall 6.09 — Enclosed Parking wi I y ouncil 18 — 1093 10/3/2023 41 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Parking Lot 0.00 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 General Office Building 10.6 Condo/Townhouse 66.3 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C & R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0 Other residential A/C and heat pumps Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00 and/or freezers Strip Mall Other commercial A/C R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 and heat pumps Strip Mall Stand-alone retail R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 refrigerators and freezers Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0 and freezers General Office Building Household refrigerators R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00 and/or freezers General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 and heat pumps Condo/Townhouse Average room A/C & R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0 Other residential A/C and heat pumps Condo/Townhouse Household refrigerators R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00 and/or freezers City Council 18 - 1094 10/3/2023 42 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated City Council 18 — 1095 43 / 50 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100. Climate • Result for• - . • Temperature and Extreme Heat 9.03 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth Wildfire 1.31 annual hectares burned Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about 3/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft. Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 44/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Temperature and Extreme Heat Extreme Precipitation Sea Level Rise Wildfire Flooding Drought Snowpack Reduction Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A L N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat Extreme Precipitation Sea Level Rise Wildfire Flooding Drought Snowpack Reduction Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 I 1 I+ The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. City Council 18 — 1097 10/3/2023 45 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores The maximum Cal EnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. Exposure Indicators — AQ-Ozone 57.8 AQ-PM 73.8 AQ-DPM 85.3 Drinking Water 53.8 Lead Risk Housing 71.1 Pesticides 0.00 Toxic Releases 90.8 Traffic 98.3 Effect Indicators — CleanUp Sites 91.8 Groundwater 0.00 Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 82.8 Impaired Water Bodies 0.00 Solid Waste 22.1 Sensitive Population — Asthma 55.8 Cardio-vascular 47.8 Low Birth Weights 41.7 Socioeconomic Fact City Council 18 — 1098 10/3/2023 46 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Education Housing Linguistic Poverty Unemployment 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., Economic Above Poverty Employed Median HI Education Bachelor's or higher High school enrollment Preschool enrollment Transportation Auto Access Active commuting Social 2-parent households Voting Neighborhood 75.4 48.1 66.9 54.4 28.2 than 50) reflects healthier community conditions 55.40870012 82.72808931 52.89362248 35.41639933 100 31.82343128 58.09059412 62.68446041 93.16052868 23.85474143 Alcohol availability 53.74053638 Park access 48.29975619 Retail density to other census tracts in the state. City Council 18 — 1099 10/3/2023 47/50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Supermarket access 72.33414603 Tree canopy 38.34210189 Housing — Homeownership 37.89298088 Housing habitability 43.38508918 Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 27.93532658 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 78.69883229 Uncrowded housing 20.37726165 Health Outcomes — Insured adults 24.71448736 Arthritis 67.1 Asthma ER Admissions 50.7 High Blood Pressure 72.3 Cancer (excluding skin) 55.0 Asthma 49.0 Coronary Heart Disease 61.0 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 53.7 Diagnosed Diabetes 54.0 Life Expectancy at Birth 67.7 Cognitively Disabled 95.5 Physically Disabled 83.0 Heart Attack ER Admissions 78.0 Mental Health Not Good 41.5 Chronic Kidney Disease 45.1 Obesity 51.8 Pedestrian Injuries 60.5 Physical Health Not Gated 44 2 City Council 18 —1100 10/3/2023 48 / 50 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Stroke Health Risk Behaviors Binge Drinking Current Smoker No Leisure Time for Physical Activity Climate Change Exposures Wildfire Risk SLR Inundation Area Children Elderly English Speaking Foreign -born Outdoor Workers Climate Change Adaptive Capacity Impervious Surface Cover Traffic Density Traffic Access Other Indices Hardship Other Decision Support 2016 Voting 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) Project Located in a [Dgiyn@WqIvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) 58.2 15.4 44.4 40.3 0.0 0.0 64.0 60.7 29.3 72.2 33.6 46.9 99.3 23.0 58.2 71.0 57.0 18—1101No 49 / 50 10/3/2023 Cabrillo Town Center (Future) Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 7.4. Health & Equity Measures No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data Land Use Construction: Construction Phases Construction: Off -Road Equipment Construction: Trips and VMT Operations: Hearths Project plans and LLG trip generation estimates. Population based on SCAG's average 2016 persons -per -household rate for the City of 4.6 persons per household. Developer information 10 CY haul truck capacity during demolition, 14 CY during site preparation and grading. Developer information City Council 18 —1102 50/50 10/3/2023 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Cabrillo Town Center 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive and 1901 and 1971 East 411 Street Santa Ana, California January 16, 2022 FRH Realty LLC 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92121 Project Number 21-12-002 Prepared by: e) Is ENVIRONMENTAL 1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116 Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 585-7070 www.welsenviro.com City Council 18 —1103 10/3/2023 eb1Nes January 16, 2022 FRH Realty LLC 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92121 1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 585-7070 Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Cabrillo Town Center 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive and 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street Santa Ana, California Project Number 21-12-002 To Whom It May Concern: www.weisenviro.com Weis Environmental, LLC has completed the contracted environmental consulting services for the above -referenced project. The services were performed in accordance with our proposal and agreement fully executed by all parties. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been performed in accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E1527-13 and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR) Part 312. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Weis Environmental, LLC OZ V_'alw_ Daniel Weis, R.E.H.S. Environmental Manager City Council 18 —1104 10/3/2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose...................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Scope of the Assessment........................................................................................................1 1.3 Limitations and Exceptions....................................................................................................2 1.4 Special Terms and Conditions................................................................................................3 1.5 Limiting Conditions and Deviations......................................................................................3 1.6 Data Failure and Data Gaps...................................................................................................3 1.7 Reliance..................................................................................................................................3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................................4 2.1 Location and Legal Description............................................................................................. 4 2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics............................................................................................4 2.3 Current Use of the Site...........................................................................................................4 2.4 Description of Site Improvements..........................................................................................4 2.5 Utilities...................................................................................................................................4 2.6 Description of Adjoining Properties......................................................................................4 3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING.................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Topography............................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Hydrology.............................................................................................................................. 6 3.3 Geology..................................................................................................................................6 3.4 Hydrogeology.........................................................................................................................6 3.5 Oil and Gas Exploration.........................................................................................................7 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION........................................................................................... 8 4.1 Title Records.......................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Environmental Liens.............................................................................................................. 8 4.3 Activity and Use Limitations................................................................................................. 8 4.4 Specialized or Actual Knowledge or Experience................................................................... 8 4.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information .............................................. 8 4.6 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues..................................................................... 8 4.7 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information..........................................................9 4.8 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA......................................................................................9 4.9 Proceedings Involving the Site...............................................................................................9 4.10 Other Provided Documents.................................................................................................... 9 5.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW.......................................................................................11 5.1 Site........................................................................................................................................12 5.2 Adjoining and Immediately Surrounding Properties...........................................................12 5.3 Surrounding Area.................................................................................................................12 5.4 Regulatory Agency File Reviews.........................................................................................13 6.0 HISTORICAL RESOURCE REVIEW.......................................................................................15 6.1 Aerial Photographs...............................................................................................................15 6.2 Topographic Maps...............................................................................................................16 6.3 City Directories....................................................................................................................16 City Council 18 -1105 10/3/2023 6.4 Fire Insurance Maps.............................................................................................................16 6.5 Other Historical Sources......................................................................................................16 7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE........................................................................................................17 7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions................................................................................17 7.2 Current General Site and Vicinity Characteristics...............................................................17 7.3 Indications of Past Site and Vicinity Uses...........................................................................17 7.4 Site -Specific Observations...................................................................................................17 8.0 INTERVIEWS.............................................................................................................................19 8.1 Site Owner............................................................................................................................19 8.2 Key Site Manager.................................................................................................................19 8.3 Current Occupants................................................................................................................19 8.4 Local Government Official..................................................................................................19 8.5 Other Parties.........................................................................................................................19 9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES —NON-SCOPE ASTM CONSIDERATIONS...............................20 10.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS....................................................................................................21 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................22 12.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT..........................................................23 13.0 ASSUMPTIONS........................................................................................................................24 14.0 DEFINITIONS...........................................................................................................................25 15.0 REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................27 15.1 Documents, Plans and Reports.............................................................................................27 15.2 Personal Communications....................................................................................................27 15.3 Agencies Consulted..............................................................................................................27 FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Topographic Map Figure 3 Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A Regulatory Database Report Appendix B Regulatory Agency Records Appendix C Historical Resources Appendix D Photographs Appendix E Interview Questionnaire Appendix F Qualifications City Council 18 —1106 10/3/2023 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the methods and findings of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Cabrillo Town Center property located at 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive and 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street, in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California (Site) performed in conformance with the contract/agreement for this assignment and the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) as published in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312. EPA promulgated the AAI rule that became effective in November 2006 and has indicated that the ASTM E 1527 practice is consistent with the requirements of AAI and may be used to comply with the provisions of the AAI rule. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the ASTM E1527 practice (framework for this Phase I ESA) is to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an ESA of a parcel of real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (Title 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 9601)) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability (hereinafter, the "landowner liability protections," or "LLPs"): that is, the practice that constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial and customary practice as defined at 42 U.S.C. Section 9601(35)(B). In defining a standard of good commercial and customary practice for conducting this Phase I ESA of the Site, the goal of the processes established by the ASTM E1527 practice is to identify, to the extent feasible, recognized environmental conditions. The term recognized environmental conditions is defined as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. In addition, controlled recognized environmental conditions, historical recognized environmental conditions and/or de minimis conditions, if identified during the completion of the assessment, are discussed herein. Definitions of these terms and other key terminology relevant to the practice are included in Section 14.0 of this report. 1.2 Scope of the Assessment In general terms, this Phase I ESA included the acquisition of readily available/accessible and practically reviewable regulatory records and historical information, a site reconnaissance, interviews, and preparation of this written report of findings. A more detailed description of the four primary components of the Phase I ESA is presented below. Records Review - A review of Federal, State, Tribal, and local standard ASTM and non-ASTM regulatory databases for a myriad of environmental identifiers including but not limited to properties with underground storage tanks (USTs), properties with leaking USTs, properties that have reported spills/releases that did not occur from a leaking UST, businesses that utilize hazardous materials and/or generate hazardous waste and hazardous waste disposal locations. The regulatory review may also Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Council 18 —1107 10/3/2023 include public records requests with one or more Federal, State, Tribal and/or local agencies. A review of historical sources is also completed to help ascertain previous land uses of the property in question and in the surrounding area. Site Reconnaissance - A property inspection and viewing of adjacent and surrounding properties for conditions that could be recognized environmental conditions. Interviews - Interviews with present and past owners, operators and/or occupants of a property and local government officials. Reporting - Evaluation of the information gathered during the completion of the Phase I ESA and the subsequent preparation of a written report. 1.3 Limitations and Exceptions Concerns regarding liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. (CERCLA) and analogous State laws, have been a primary driver for Phase I ESA assignments in commercial real estate transactions. While the ASTM E1527 practice can be used in many contexts, a familiarity with CERCLA and its potential LLPs is critical in understanding and applying the ASTM E1527 practice. We advise consultation with legal counsel if further inquiry or information is desired. AAI represents the minimum level of inquiry necessary to support the LLPs. However, it is important to understand that additional inquiry ultimately may be necessary or desirable for legal as well as business reasons depending upon the outcome of this inquiry and the particular risk tolerances of a given user. For example, additional inquiry may assist a user of a Phase I ESA in determining whether he or she would have continuing obligations in the event he or she acquires a given property and may also assist the user in defining the scope of future steps to be taken to satisfy such obligations. In addition, a user may be concerned about business environmental risks or non -scope ASTM considerations that do not fall within the definition of a recognized environmental condition. In addition, this assessment did not include subsurface or other invasive exploration. Users are also cautioned that Federal, State, Tribal and local laws may impose environmental assessment obligations that are beyond the scope of the ASTM E1527 practice. The evaluation, opinion and conclusions presented herein are based solely on visual observations and regulatory, historical, and personal knowledge related information that existed at the time our assessment was completed. The use of the gathered information is exclusively for the purposes outlined in this report and only for the Site. Our firm can make no warranty, either express or implied, except that the services conducted were performed in accordance with generally accepted environmental assessment practices applicable at the time and location of the assessment and that the conclusions of the assessment have been based in part on professional judgment/experience, an interpretation of readily available data and the standard of care normally followed by similar professionals practicing in a similar locale and under similar circumstances. Any opinions presented cannot apply to Site changes of which our firm is unaware and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. In addition, this report cannot feasibly include any evaluation of undocumented activities at the Site or on adjacent or nearby properties. Lastly, a Phase I ESA meeting or exceeding this practice and completed less than 180 days prior to the date of acquisition of a given property or (for transactions not involving an acquisition) the date of the intended transaction is presumed to be valid. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Council 18 -1108 10/3/2023 1.4 Special Terms and Conditions This Phase I ESA was prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract/agreement for the work as executed between our firm and the client. There are no other special terms and conditions established between our firm and the client pertinent to the findings of this ESA or methodology used to complete this assessment. In addition, our firm has no final or other vested interest in the Site or adjacent/surrounding properties, or in any entity that owns or occupies the Site or adjacent/surrounding properties. 1.5 Limiting Conditions and Deviations There were no significant limiting conditions that would inhibit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions noted during the completion of this assessment. In addition, there were no deviations from the ASTM E1527 standard noted during the completion of this assessment. Any limiting conditions that are not considered to be ones that would inhibit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions at the Site are referenced in applicable sections of this report. 1.6 Data Failure and Data Gaps No instances of data failure were encountered during the completion of this assessment. In addition, no data gaps of significance (i.e., those that would inhibit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions) were identified during the completion of this assessment. Any data gaps that are not considered to be ones that would inhibit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions at the Site are referenced in applicable sections of this report. 1.7 Reliance This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client. This report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written consent of both our firm and our client. The scope of services performed for this assessment may not be appropriate to satisfy the specific needs of other users, and any use or reuse of this document would be at the sole risk of said users. Any other party seeking liability protection under CERCLA must take independent action to accomplish its objective. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Council 18 —1109 10/3/2023 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Location and Legal Description The Site is a reported 8.97 acres, is addressed as 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street and 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive and is further identified by Orange County Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 400-051- 14, 400-051-15, 400-051-09, and 400-051-02. The Site is located on the northeast corner of Cabrillo Park Drive and East 4th Street. A Vicinity Map is included as Figure 1. A Site Plan is included as Figure 2. 2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics The Site and the surrounding vicinity are situated in the City of Santa Ana that consists primarily of commercial, medical, and residential properties and public roadways. Additional details pertaining to the Site and its adjoining properties are provided in the sections below. 2.3 Current Use of the Site The Site is currently utilized for commercial office purposes and is further identified as the Cabrillo Town Center. 2.4 Description of Site Improvements The Site is developed with four multi -story commercial office buildings, adjoining asphalt paved parking lots, and limited landscaping. The buildings appear to be constructed on concrete slab -on - grade foundations. Indicators of various utility systems are also present throughout the Site. 2.5 Utilities Utilities that are reported to be present at the Site or provide service in the surrounding area are noted below along with their municipal provider where applicable. If certain utility systems are not provided by public agencies or entities, they are noted as privately maintained. Utility Provider (Where Applicable) Potable Water City of Santa Ana Sewage Maintenance City of Santa Ana Electrical Southern California Edison Natural Gas Southern California Gas Solid Waste Disposal Waste Management 2.6 Description of Adjoining Properties Adjoining properties are defined as any real property or properties, the border of which is contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the subject property of a Phase I ESA, or that would be contiguous or partially contiguous with that of a subject property but for a street, road, or other public thoroughfare separating them. To the extent feasible, our firm performed a visual inspection of adjoining properties from the Site boundaries and along public right of ways. We did not encroach on to adjoining private Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Council 18 —1110 10/3/2023 property during the completion of this assessment. The following table identifies the adjoining property uses: Direction Adjoining Property Use North Cabrillo Park South East 41h Street followed by commercial properties. East Commercial properties. West Cabrillo Park Drive followed by commercial properties and vacant land. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Council 18 —1111 10/3/2023 3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING 3.1 Topography The Site is depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map for the Tustin 7.5-minute quadrangle. The Site is shown on the map as being situated at an elevation of approximately 150 feet above mean sea level. The Site and surrounding area appear relatively level with a slight gradient downward to the south. There are no improvements , structures or surface waters depicted on - Site on the map. Adjoining and surrounding roadways are depicted on the map. The Site as depicted on a topographic map is included as Figure 3. 3.2 Hydrology The Site is situated within the Lower Santa Ana River Basin. There are no known substantial hydrologic features at the Site including major storm drain inlets or obvious drainages, channels, or surface waters. The Site is currently undergoing demolition activities. Due to the substantial amount of improvements at the Site, infiltration of precipitation to the Site is considered to be relatively minor. Excess water appears to flow as surface runoff to various storm drain inlets at the Site. On -Site storm drains appear to discharge to the municipal stormwater conveyance system. The Site does not appear to receive significant drainage from off -Site properties. 3.3 Geology General geologic information pertaining to the Site is presented in the table below. Geologic Consideration Details California Geomorphic Peninsular Ranges. Province Mapped Soils or Formation The Site is located in the Coastal Plain of Orange County which is underlain by a coastal alluvial plain. Description of Soils or According to lithological descriptions provided during prior subsurface Formation investigative work, the Site is underlain by silty sand, sandy silt, and clayey silt with sand. Distance/Direction to The closest reported mapped active fault is the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon Mapped Faults Fault located approximately five miles to the southwest. 3.4 Hydrogeology General hydrogeologic information pertaining to the Site is presented in the table below. Hydrogeologic Details Consideration Groundwater Basin or Unit Santa Ana Groundwater Basin. Irvine Groundwater Management Zone. Beneficial Uses Municipal and domestic supply, agricultural supply, industrial service supply, and industrial process supply. Estimated Depth to Estimated at greater than 20 feet bgs. Groundwater Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Council 18 —1112 10/3/2023 Hydrogeologic Consideration Details Estimated Flow of South. Groundwater Known Site or Regional Groundwater Contamination None. Issues 3.5 Oil and Gas Exploration According to online resources provided by the California Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division (Ca1GEM), there are no oil, gas or geothermal wells located on the Site or its adjacent properties. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Council 18 —1113 10/3/2023 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION A representative of the user of this report was interviewed during the completion of this assessment. The questions posed during the interview are defined by the ASTM E1527 practice. The client also provided our firm with any land title records and judicial records that may be available for the Site as part of the required evaluation for environmental liens and activity and use limitations (AULs) in connection with the subject property of a Phase I ESA. As stated in the ASTM E1527 practice, it is the responsibility of the user of the report to provide any available records pertaining to environmental liens and AULs that may exist in connection with a given property. Any land title and judicial recorded provided to our firm are discussed below. If such information is not discussed in the sections below, it was not provided by the user of the report. In addition to the contact information obtained, the user of the report was also asked if they are aware of other useful documents that may exist and if so whether copies can be provided to the environmental professional within reasonable time and cost constraints. A list of typical useful documents is included in Section 10.8.1 of the ASTM E1527 practice and include but are not limited to environmental assessment reports, compliance audits and permits, registrations for tank and other aboveground or underground systems, safety plans, spill prevention and other facility -related plans and geological/geotechnical studies and environmental governmental agency notices and/or correspondence. 4.1 Title Records Our firm was provided with an ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance pertaining to the Site prepared by First American Title Insurance Company and dated November 10, 2021. No environmentally related liens, deed restrictions or activity and use limitations pertaining to the Site were noted in the title report. 4.2 Environmental Liens The client is unaware of environmental liens in connection with the Site. 4.3 Activity and Use Limitations The client is unaware of AULs in connection with the Site. 4.4 Specialized or Actual Knowledge or Experience The client is unaware of specialized knowledge, actual knowledge or experience that is material to recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site. 4.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information The client is unaware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information within the local community that is material to recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site. 4.6 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues The client is unaware of information pertaining to an undervalued purchase price of the Site relative to the estimated fair market value of the Site due to the presence of contamination. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Page i y Council 18 —1114 10/3/2023 4.7 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information The Site is currently owned and managed by the David A Colton Trust. The Site is currently utilized for commercial/office purposes by multiple tenants. 4.8 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA The client has commissioned this Phase I ESA as part of a proposed acquisition and future redevelopment. The Phase I ESA is also being completed to assist the client in complying with 40 CFR Part 312. 4.9 Proceedings Involving the Site The client is unaware of pending, threatened, or past litigation and administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the Site. The client is also unaware of notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products in connection with the Site. 4.10 Other Provided Documents The following prior Phase I and II ESAs pertaining to the Site were provided by the client: • Stantec. 2021. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street and 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, Santa Ana, California. June 18, 2021. • Stantec. 2018. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street and 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, Santa Ana, California. July 13, 2021. The Phase I ESA was performed in general accordance with ASTM Standard E1527-13 and consisted of a site reconnaissance, interviews with knowledgeable personnel, review of historical documentation, and review of federal, state, and local regulatory databases. Findings, relevant information, and conclusions presented in the Stantec Phase I ESA include: • The Site was historically utilized for agricultural (i.e. orchards) purposes from circa 1938 until 1966. Stantec noted that agricultural use can be a potential concern due to the possible use of pesticides and herbicides. Therefore, Stantec recommended collecting shallow soil samples to evaluate for potential residual organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and arsenic and lead concentrations that may exist at concentrations of potential concern relative to Site development. The aforementioned was identified as a recognized environmental condition. • Stantec also noted that asbestos -containing materials and lead -based paint may be present in on -Site building materials and testing should be performed before any major renovations or demolition. This also included the potential presence of petromat in the asphalt paved parking lot. This was noted as a non-ASTM consideration. Based on the above findings, a Phase II ESA was performed by Stantec. The general scope of work and associated findings and conclusions are as follows: • Fifteen (15) soil borings were advanced throughout the exterior portions of the Site and to a maximum depth of three (3) feet below the ground surface. Soil samples were collected from each boring at 0.5-1.0 feet, 1.5-2.0 feet, and 2.5-3.0 feet. The soil samples collected from 0.5- 1.0 feet were initially submitted for laboratory analytical testing that included OCPs by EPA test Method 8081A and arsenic and lead by EPA test Method 6010B. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Council 18 —1115 10/3/2023 • One or more OCPs were detected in two (2) of the 15 samples. The detected compounds included 4,4-DDE (maximum detection of 0.036 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)) and 4,4- DDT (maximum detection of 0.0031 mg/kg). The residential human health risk based screening levels for these compounds are 2.0 mg/kg (4,4-DDE) and 1.9 mg/kg (4,4-DDT). OCPs were not found to be contaminants of concern. • Total arsenic and lead were detected in each of the 15 samples at maximum concentrations of 5.9 mg/kg (arsenic) and 52 mg/kg (lead). The detected arsenic concentrations were below the commonly applied ambient screening level of 12 mg/kg for this element (indicative of naturally occurring concentrations in southern California soils) and the detected lead concentrations were below the residential human health risk based screening level of 80 mg/kg. • No additional assessment was recommended. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1116 10/3/2023 5.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW Our firm commissioned the preparation of a regulatory database report from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) as part of the regulatory records review. EDR searches a myriad of Federal, State, and local government environmental databases during the preparation of their deliverables. Certain databases are specifically required by the ASTM E1527 practice and are referenced as "standard ASTM regulatory databases." Such databases are searched to at least the minimum search distance around a given property as defined in the practice. Other regulatory databases are also searched that are not specifically referenced in ASTM E 1527. Such databases are referenced as "non- ASTM regulatory databases" and are searched as varying radii around a given property as selected by ERIS. A copy of the regulatory database report is included in Appendix A. The following table are summaries of the information found in the relevant database listings and our opinion regarding the potential for the Site to be impacted. Our opinion is based on the information found in the database listings, through other historical and regulatory resources and assumed groundwater flow direction. Search Number of Subject Adjacent Database Radius Reported Property Sites Facilities Standard Environmental Records Federal National Priorities List (NPL)/NPL Delisted 1.00 mile 0 No No Federal Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) 0.50 mile 0 No No (formerly known as CERCLIS) Federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) 0.50 mile 0 No No Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act— Corrective 1.00 mile 2 No No Action (RCRA CORRACTS) Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS Treatment and Disposal Facilities 0.50 mile 1 No No (RCRA TSD) Federal RCRA Generators (RCRA GEN) 0.25 mile 35 No Yes Federal Institutional / Engineering Controls (IC/EC) 0.50 mile 0 No No Federal Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) 0.001 0 No No State/Tribal- Equivalent NPL (RESPONSE) 1.00 mile 0 No No State/Tribal-Equivalent CERCLIS (ENVIROSTOR) 1.00 mile 20 No No State/Tribal Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal (SWL/LF) 0.50 mile 0 No No State/Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST), Cleanup Program Sites (CPS) / Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups 0.50 mile 11 No Yes (SLIC) State/Tribal Underground/Aboveground Storage Tanks 0.25 mile 5 No Yes (USTs/ASTs) State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) 0.50 mile 0 No No State/Tribal Brownfields Sites 0.50 mile 0 No No Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1117 10/3/2023 5.1 Site The Colton Company (525 Cabrillo Park Drive) — This business is listed on the HAZNET database with an EPA ID number of CAC002808112 (inactive as of June 22, 2015). No additional details were provided. 1X Town Center Plasa / Colton Co (1901 East 411 Street) — These businesses are listed on the HAZNET and Historical Manifest (HIST MANIFEST) databases with EPA ID numbers of CAC000615008 (inactive as of October 25, 2000), CAC002606987 (inactive as of February 5, 2007) and CAC000615008 (removal of 2.81 tons of waste oil and mixed oil in 1992). Knox Services (1971 East 4'b Street) — This business is listed on the HAZNET database with an EPA ID number of CAL000131127 (inactive as of June 30, 1998). No additional details were provided. None of the above referenced business or the Site addresses are listed on databases indicative of releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products to the subsurface. 5.2 Adjoining and Immediately Surrounding Properties Kaiser Foundation Hospital / Kaiser / 1X K F HLTH Plan Inc. (1900 East 41" Street) — This south adjacent property (hydrologically down -gradient) of the Site is listed on HAZNET, HIST MANFIEST, Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act - Non Generator / No Longer Regulated (RCRA NON GEN) databases. According to the information reviewed, the property is identified by Registry ID 110070446876 and the EPA IDs CAC000594336, CAC002277737, CAC002612593, and CAL000188633. Asbestos related waste was removed from the property and the property and is not listed on databases indicative of releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products to the subsurface. Golden Circle Chiropractic (2001 East 411 Street) — This southeast adjacent property (hydrologically cross -gradient) of the Site is listed on the HAZNET database. According to the information reviewed, the property is identified by the EPA ID CAL000188633 and is inactive as of June 1, 1996. No additional details were provided. Dubitec America Inc. (2000 East 411 Street) - This southeast adjacent property (hydrologically cross - gradient) of the Site is listed on the PROCESSORS and RECYCLING databases. No additional details were provided. ENVIROTECH (1801 East Parkcourt Place) — This west adjacent property (hydrologically cross - gradient) of the Site is listed on the RCRA NON GEN database. According to the information reviewed, the property is identified by the EPA ID CAD983615998. The facility is listed as having a compliance related violation with no specific details provided. No violations pertaining to spills and releases were reported for the adjoining properties. In addition, the properties are not listed on databases indicative of releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products to the subsurface. No other adjoining/immediately surrounding properties (within 100-feet) were listed on any of the regulatory databases researched. 5.3 Surrounding Area In our opinion, none of the other listings on the regulatory database report pose a significant threat to the Site as there is no indication of a release at the respective properties, a release has occurred but Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1118 10/3/2023 groundwater has not been impacted, a release has occurred but the case is closed, or the listed properties are located cross or down gradient of the Site and in excess of 1/10 mile from the Site. 5.4 Regulatory Agency File Reviews If a property being assessed under a Phase I ESA or any of the adjoining properties are identified on one or more of the above referenced standard environmental record sources, pertinent regulatory files and/or records associated with such listings should be reviewed to assist the environmental professional in evaluating if recognized environmental conditions existing at a given subject property in connection with any listings. However, if in the environmental professional's opinion, such a review is not warranted, file reviews need not be conducted if the environmental professional provides justification for not doing so. Agency file reviews for the Site completed during this assessment are noted below. No file reviews for adjoining properties or properties in the surrounding area were deemed warranted with the exception of research completed on the State Water Resources Control Board Geotracker database regarding properties in the surrounding area of the Site. The agency inquiries were performed by way of online searches/queries of published databases, and/or direct inquiries with public records clerks at one or more agencies. Copies of State and local agency records are included in Appendix B. Regulatory Date of Response or Agency Jurisdiction Inquiry or Contact Information Request From Agency Online https://enviro.epa.gov/ United States EPA https://echo.epa.gov/facilities/facility No Records Envirofacts/ECHO/ Federal 12/20/2021 -search Identified TRIS https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release- inventory-tri-program California https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/ Department of State 12/20/2021 public No Records Toxic Substances Identified Control Public Records Request https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.g State Water ov/ Resources Control No Records Board/Regional State 12/20/2021 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.g Identified Water Quality ov/historical_ust_facilities Control Board Public Records Request Orange County Local 12/20/2021 Public Records Clerk No Records Healthcare Agency Identified City of Santa Ana Local 12/20/2021 Public Records Clerk Records Identified As shown in the table above, records pertaining to the Site were not provided by the agencies contacted with the exception of the City of Santa Ana. City of Santa Ana records contain copies of general Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 -1119 10/3/2023 building, utility and other general construction related permits pertaining to the Site. No environmental concerns are noted in the permits. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1120 10/3/2023 6.0 HISTORICAL RESOURCE REVIEW The objective of consulting historical sources is to develop a history of the previous uses of a property and surrounding area, in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to recognized environmental conditions in connection with a given property. The goal of the historical research is to identify all obvious uses of a subject property from the present, back to the property's first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. The environmental professional exercises professional judgment in reviewing only as many of the standard historical sources referenced in ASTM E 1527 that are deemed necessary, are reasonably ascertainable and are likely to be useful. Historical resources reviewed during the completion of this assessment are referenced below. Copies of historical resources (obtained from the prior Phase I ESA) are included in Appendix C. 6.1 Aerial Photographs We reviewed historical aerial photographs from the years 1938, 1946, 1952, 1963, 1966, 1972, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1994, 1995, 2002, 2005, 2009, 2012, and 2016 obtained by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The table below presents the results of the photograph review. Photograph Year Site Observations Adjoining Property Observations The Site appears to be utilized for Adjoining properties are comprised of 1938-1966 agricultural purposes. agricultural or vacant land, with some commercial and residential development. North: Existing park. The structure located in the southeast South: Agricultural. 1972 corner of the Site is visible, while the balance appears to be graded and/or East: Undergoing construction associated with vacant land. the current improvements. West: Agricultural. The structure on the southwest corner North: No significant changes. of the Site is visible, while construction South: Graded land. 1977 of the two remaining structures in the northern portion of the Site is ongoing. East: Developed in its current configuration. The balance of the Site appears to be asphalt -paved parking. West: Agricultural and vacant land. 1985 to 2016 The Site appears to be in its current Adjoining properties appear generally similar to configuration. their current configurations. As stated above and previously in the report, the Site was previously used for agricultural purposes. During historical agricultural activities throughout the State of California, various pesticides and more specifically OCPs were commonly applied during the normal course of agricultural operations. Such compounds have since been banned from production and use in the United States. Based on the regulatory and historical research completed during the preparation of this assessment, no information has been revealed that would lead us to believe that an accidental spill or release of pesticide products has occurred at the Site. In addition, prior soil sampling and analysis activities completed at the Site did not reveal detections of agricultural chemicals or other contaminants of concern at concentrations Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1121 10/3/2023 above residential human health risk -based screening levels. As such, the historical agricultural use of the Site is not considered to be a recognized environmental condition in connection with the Site. 6.2 Topographic Maps Our firm reviewed topographic maps from the years 1896, 1898, 1901, 1902, 1932, 1935, 1942, 1948/1949, 1950, 1964/1965. 1972, 1981, and 2012 obtained by EDR. In general, the Site was noted as being shaded green for agricultural use or due to lack of map details. No remarkable features or structures were noted on the Site. However, adjoining roadways are visible. 6.3 City Directories Our firm reviewed a city directory abstract prepared by EDR. The abstract was prepared using available city directories dated 1920 to 2014. Listings for the Site included various commercial office and medical related occupants. The city directories were consistent with previously identified Site knowledge and no listings of environmental concern were noted. Adjoining and nearby properties in the surrounding area are primarily referenced in the directories as being used for general commercial and retail purposes of no significant environmental concern to the Site. 6.4 Fire Insurance Maps No fire insurance maps were found showing the Site or nearby properties. 6.5 Other Historical Sources Other historical sources are referenced in the ASTM E1527 practice as any source or sources other than the standard historical sources referenced in the practice that are credible to a reasonable person and that identify past uses of a subject property. This category includes, but is not limited to miscellaneous maps and directories, newspaper archives, internet sites, community organizations, local libraries, historical societies, current owners or occupants of neighboring properties, or records in the files and/or personal knowledge of the property owner and/or occupants. No historical sources other than the standard sources described above were deemed necessary and useful to assist in identifying recognized environmental conditions. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1122 10/3/2023 7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The objective of the Site reconnaissance is to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection with a subject property. The Site visit for our assessment was completed on January 5, 2021 by James Wright of our firm. Mr. Wright was unaccompanied during the reconnaissance. 7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions The Site reconnaissance consisted of observing the exterior grounds of the Site on foot, select interiors of the Site structures, and walking publicly accessible areas surrounding the Site. No significant limiting conditions of the Site inspection were note. Select photographs of the Site obtained during the Site reconnaissance are included in Appendix D. 7.2 Current General Site and Vicinity Characteristics The Site and the surrounding vicinity are situated in the City of Santa Ana that consists primarily of commercial, medical, and residential properties and public roadways. The Site is currently utilized for commercial office purposes and is further identified as the Cabrillo Town Center. The current uses of the Site and adjoining properties are not ones that are indicative of the use, treatment, storage disposal or generation of hazardous substances or petroleum products that have adversely impacted the Site. 7.3 Indications of Past Site and Vicinity Uses There are no material differences between the current and past uses of the Site, adjoining properties and the surrounding area Site that were visually and/or physically observed during the Site reconnaissance that pertain to recognized environmental conditions. 7.4 Site -Specific Observations We examined visible and accessible areas of the Site for the features and conditions noted in the table below. Feature or Condition Details The Site is developed with four multi -story commercial office buildings, General Description of Structures adjoining asphalt paved parking lots, and limited landscaping. The buildings appear to be constructed on concrete slab -on -grade foundations. Indicators of various utility systems are also present throughout the Site. Drains and Sumps Typical exterior area drains and interior floor drains are present at the Site. No significant staining, odors or other suspect conditions were noted. Heating/Cooling Systems Typical roof -mounted systems. Potable Water Supply City of Santa Ana Roads East 41h Street and Cabrillo Park Drive borders the south and west sides of the Site, respectively. Septic Systems / Sewage Disposal City of Santa Ana System Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1123 10/3/2023 Feature or Condition Details None observed. Stormwater appears to flow as surface runoff to storm Wastewater and Stormwater drains located at the Site. Storm drains appear to discharge to the Discharges municipal stormwater conveyance system. No staining, odors or other suspect conditions were noted. Wells None observed. Drums None observed. Electrical or Hydraulic Equipment Pad -mounted transformers were observed on Site. No staining, odors or Known to Contain PCBs or Likely to other suspect conditions were noted. Contain PCBs Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products in Connection None observed. with Identified Uses Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Products Not Necessarily None observed. in Connection With Identified Uses Odors None noted. Pits, Ponds or Lagoons None observed. Pools of Liquid None observed. Solid Waste None observed. (Including Fill Material) Containerized in standard trash dumpsters and managed by a local Stained Soil or Pavement disposal facility. No significant staining, odors or other suspect conditions were noted. Stains or Corrosion None observed. Chemical Storage Tanks None observed. Stressed Vegetation None observed. Unidentified Substance Containers None observed. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1124 10/3/2023 8.0 INTERVIEWS 8.1 Site Owner David Colton, designated Site owner representative completed an environmental questionnaire pertaining to the Site and is unaware of environmental concerns in connection with the Site. A copy of the questionnaire is included in Appendix E. 8.2 Key Site Manager The Site owner is also considered to be the Key Site Manager. Please refer to Section 8.1 above. 8.3 Current Occupants Site occupants were not interviewed during the completion of our assessment. The lack of interviews with the Site occupants is not considered to be a data gap of significance or one that would alter our conclusions and recommendations regarding the Site. 8.4 Local Government Official During the preparation of this assessment, public records clerks with the County of Orange and City of Santa Ana were contacted by our firm regarding the Site. Representatives of these agencies indicated that public records requests should be conducted in order to obtain information known by the agencies regarding the Site. Public records requests were completed by our firm as described in Section 5.3. 8.5 Other Parties Interviews with other persons were not conducted during the preparation of this assessment. As stated in the ASTM E1527 practice, interviews with past owners, operators, and occupants of a subject property who are likely to have material information regarding the potential for contamination at a given property shall be conducted to the extent that they have been identified and that the information likely to be obtained is not duplicative of information already obtained from other sources. Interviews with persons with past association with the Site were not deemed warranted during the completion of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1125 10/3/2023 9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES — NON -SCOPE ASTM CONSIDERATIONS No additional services as defined by ASTM were completed by our firm during the preparation of this assessment. Several non -scope ASTM considerations are referenced in the ASTM E1527 practice that a user of a report may wish to evaluate. Listed considerations in the practice include asbestos - containing building materials, biological agents, cultural and historic resources, ecological resources, endangered species, health and safety, indoor air quality (unrelated to releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the environment), industrial hygiene, lead -based paint, lead in drinking water, mold, radon, regulatory compliance and wetlands. No implication is intended by the practice as to the relative importance of inquiry into such non -scope considerations, and the list of considerations is not intended to be all-inclusive. An evaluation of one or more of the non -scope considerations was not requested of our firm as part of the scope of services for the assessment. Therefore, no findings, opinions and conclusions of this assessment are based on said non -scope ASTM considerations. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1126 10/3/2023 10.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS No features and/or conditions indicating the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products at the Site that are considered to have the potential to adversely impact the Site were identified during the completion of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1127 10/3/2023 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM International Practice E1527 of the Site located at 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive and 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street, in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions, controlled recognized environmental conditions or historical recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site. Additional assessment at the Site is not considered to be warranted at this time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1128 10/3/2023 12.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of environmental professional as defined in Section 3 12. 10 of 40 CFR. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Site. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Qualifications of personnel involved with the completion of this report are included in Appendix F. Daniel Weis, R.E.H.S. Environmental Manager Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1129 10/3/2023 13.0 ASSUMPTIONS No Phase I ESA effort can eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions to exist in connection with a given property. Performance of the ASTM E 1527 practice may reduce such uncertainty but in no way should the findings and report be misconstrued as insurance or a guarantee regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a given property. The ASTM E1527 practice recognizes reasonable limits of time and cost relative to the completion of a Phase I ESA. During the completion of this ESA, our firm relied on certain information obtained from secondary sources, including but not limited to the user of the report, government agencies, historical research business entities, environmental databases, and interviews with one or more persons. The sources obtained and/or consulted are assumed to be reliable. However, our firm cannot warranty or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is wholly accurate or complete. Our firm is not responsible for any misrepresentations or false statements that may be provided by others or the lack of pertinent/relevant information that should have been provided/disclosed by others and we assume no responsibility for any consequence as a result of such omissions or withheld information. Accuracy and completeness of records varies among information sources, including from governmental agencies. As a result, there is a possibility that even with the proper application of the methodologies presented in ASTM E1527, conditions may exist that could not be identified within the scope of this assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. In addition, any responses received from Federal, State, Tribal, and local regulatory agency secondary sources of information after the issuance of this report may change certain findings and conclusions of this report. Estimations and opinions regarding the potential for off -Site properties to adversely impact a given subject property is one of the key components of a Phase I ESA. In most cases, recent property -specific or adjacent -property specific measured groundwater data or other hydrogeological information is not reasonably ascertainable. In the absence of such data, reasonable assumptions regarding the depth and flow of groundwater are made based on various sources including comparisons to surface elevations, land topography and available hydrogeological on the State of California Geotracker database. In addition, estimations and opinions regarding potential impacts from off -Site locations may be based on certain assumptions that a hazardous substance or petroleum product may not migrate laterally within unsaturated soil for a substantial distance and that contaminants that have reached saturated soil and groundwater may attenuate over time and/or may decrease in concentration relative to distance from its source. While any interpretations presented herein may be effective in reducing uncertainty regarding potential impacts to a subject property from off -Site locations, in no way should the findings and report be misconstrued as insurance or a guarantee regarding the potential for such impacts to occur. Greater certainty regarding subsurface conditions at a given property can only be achieved by way of a subsurface sampling effort of one or more media. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1130 10/3/2023 14.0 DEFINITIONS Definitions of key terminology relevant to the ASTM E1527 practice are presented below. Recognized Environmental Condition - The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition - A recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk -based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Data Failure - A failure to achieve the historical research objectives as outlined in the ASTM E1527 practice even after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. Data failure is one type of data gap. Data Gap - A lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by the ASTM E 1527 practice, including, but not limited to site reconnaissance (for example, an inability to conduct the site visit), and interviews (for example, an inability to interview the key site manager, regulatory officials, etc.). Data gaps are only considered to be significant if they affect the ability of the environmental professional to identify recognized environmental conditions. De Minimis Condition - A condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions nor controlled recognized environmental conditions. Environment - (A) the navigable waters, the waters of the contiguous zone, and the ocean waters of which the natural resources are under the exclusive management authority of the United States under the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act [16 U.S.C. §§ 1801 et seq.], and (B) any other surface water, groundwater, drinking water supply, land surface or subsurface strata, or ambient air within the United States or under the jurisdiction of the United States. Good Faith - The absence of any intention to seek an unfair advantage or to defraud another party; an honest and sincere intention to fulfill one's obligations in the conduct or transaction concerned. Hazardous Substance - Includes hazardous substances designated under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) or Section 102 of CERCLA, any toxic pollutant listed under Section 307(a) of the CWA, any waste that has been listed as a RCRA hazardous waste or possesses a RCRA hazardous waste characteristic, any substance that is identified as a hazardous pollutant under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), and any imminently hazardous chemical that EPA has taken action pursuant to Section 7 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Historical Recognized Environmental Condition - A past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1131 10/3/2023 meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property in question to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Petroleum Exclusion — While the definition of a CERCLA hazardous substance specifically excludes petroleum products and crude oil, the EPA has determined that the petroleum exclusion applies to petroleum products such as gasoline and other fuels containing lead, benzene or other hazardous substances that are normally added during the refining process. Notwithstanding the existence of the petroleum exclusion, petroleum products are included within the scope of the ASTM E 1527 practice for multiple reasons. Petroleum products have historically been widely used at commercial properties. In addition, other federal and state laws may impose liability for releases or spills of petroleum products. Reasonably Ascertainable Information - Information that is (1) publicly available, (2) obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints and (3) practically reviewable. Release or Threatened Release - Spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping or disposing into the environment (including the abandonment or discarding of barrels, containers and other closed receptacles containing any hazardous substance, or pollutant or contaminant). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1132 10/3/2023 15.0 REFERENCES Sources of information consulted during the completion of our Phase I ESA are noted in the sections below. 15.1 Documents, Plans and Reports • All Appropriate Inquiry" as necessary to satisfy the defenses available under 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(b)(3), 9607(r)(1), and 9607(q), relying on definitions provided at 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(35)(B); and as further explained in 40 CFR §§ 312.1 — 312.31. • ASTM International, "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process," ASTM Designation E 1527-13, Published November 2013. • California Geological Survey, 2002, California Geomorphic Provinces Note 36, Electronic Copy, Revised December. • California State Water Resources Control Board, Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin (8), California, Published 2019. • ERIS Database Report dated December 16, 2021. • State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), GeoTracker, accessed December 16, 2021. • USGS topographic map, Tustin, California Quadrangle (2016). • Stantec. 2021. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street and 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, Santa Ana, California. June 18, 2021. • Stantec. 2018. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street and 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, Santa Ana, California. July 13, 2021. 15.2 Personal Communications • Client Representative — Mr. Grant Williams • Designated Site Owner Representative — Mr. David Colton • Key Site Manager — Mr. David Colton 15.3 Agencies Consulted • California Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division (Ca1GEM) • California Department of Toxic Substances Control • California State Water Resources Control Board • City of Santa Ana • Orange County Healthcare Agency • United States EPA Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 16, 2022 Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA ouncil 18 —1133 10/3/2023 FIGURES City Council 18 —1134 10/3/2023 FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP City Council 18 —1135 10/3/2023 Matchpoint Tennis Academy at Cabrillo 9 b Harbin & McCam Attorneys Al Law racial Connections W Cr 0 77 a Cabrillo Park SITE Gold n Circle Church USGE-Upland Group 9 IckCdidenr� ..fi Power 9 4 OC urgent C ire LD E 4t h St ri r" Citizens Business Sank r `r California Department L 0 of Transportation... 9 L o_ 0 4 n M ti } The Fullman Firm 9 f1� Social Security Ar-Iminirtr�finn HIdSi{I1lR f'.r1ffPP r'.flnlrFAfTU Figure 1 - Vicinity Map Cabrillo Town Center Santa Ana. California Think Tog, 9 Aspen Woods Niki's Indian Food Walbl Prepared by: Weis Environmental 1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116 Carlsbad, CA 92008 N e Is ENVIRONMENTAL FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN City Council 18 —1137 10/3/2023 Prepared by: Figure 2 - Site Plan Weis Environmental 1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116 Cabrillo Town Center Carlsbad, CA 92008 N Santa Ana, California e) e is ENVIRONMENTAL FIGURE 3 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP City Council 18 —1139 10/3/2023 Figure 3 - Topographic Map Cabrillo Town Center Santa Ana. California Prepared by: Weis Environmental 1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116 Carlsbad, CA 92008 N e LS ENVIRONMENTAL APPENDICES City Council 18 —1141 10/3/2023 APPENDIX A REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT City Council 18 —1142 10/3/2023 Project Property: Project No: Report Type: Order No: Requested by: Date Completed: Cabrillo Town Center Cabrillo Town Center Santa Ana CA 92705 Database Report 21121600065 Weis Environmental, LLC December 16, 2021 Environmental Risk Information Services A division of Glacier Media Inc. 1.866.5tVit�2(6,6unr fo@erisinfo.com erisinfo.com 18 —1143 10/3/2023 Table of Contents Tableof Contents...........................................................................................2 ExecutiveSummary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................9 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties......................................................................10 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.......................................................................................................19 Map...............................................................................................................32 Aerial.............................................................................................................35 TopographicMap..........................................................................................36 DetailReport.................................................................................................37 UnplottableSummary.................................................................................234 UnplottableReport......................................................................................235 Appendix: Database Descriptions...............................................................238 Definitions...................................................................................................253 Notice: IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report: This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re -sold. Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report (s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1144 10/3/2023 Property Information: Project Property: Project No: Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Northing UTM Easting: UTM Zone: Elevation: Order Information: Order No: Date Requested: Requested by: Report Type: Historicals/Products: ERIS Xplorer Excel Add -On Executive Summary Cabrillo Town Center Cabrillo Town Center Santa Ana CA 92705 33,74948565 -117.83970998 3, 734, 696.64 422, 226.63 11S 144 FT 21121600065 December 16, 2021 Weis Environmental, LLC Database Report ERIS &lorer Excel Add -On erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1145 10/3/2023 Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.501ni 1.001ni Standard Environmental Records Federal Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOE FUSRAP Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NPL Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROPOSED NPL Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 DELETED NPL Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 SEMS Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 ODI Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 SEMS ARCHIVE Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 IODI Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS NFRAP Y PO 0 - - - - 0 CERCLIS LIENS Y 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 RCRA CORRACTS Y 0.5 0 0 2 8 - 10 RCRA TSD Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 RCRA LQG Y 0.25 0 0 4 4 RCRA SQG Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 RCRA VSQG Y 0.25 0 5 16 - 21 RCRA NON GEN Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA CONTROLS Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 FED ENG Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 FED INST Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 LUCIS Y PO 0 - - - 0 ERNS 1982 TO 1986 Y PO 0 0 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 Y PO 0 - - - 0 ERNS Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 FED BROWNFIELDS Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 FEMA UST Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 FRP erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1146 10/3/2023 Database Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 HIST GAS STATIONS Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 REFN Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 BULK TERMINAL Y PO 0 - - - - 0 SEMS LIEN Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPERFUND ROD State Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 RESPONSE ENVIROSTOR Y 1 0 0 1 1 18 20 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELISTED ENVS Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 SWF/LF Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 SWRCB SWF Y 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 HWP Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 SWAT Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 C&D DEBRIS RECY Y 0.5 0 1 0 0 1 RECYCLING Y 0.5 0 1 0 0 1 PROCESSORS Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 CONTAINER RECY Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 LDS LUST Y 0.5 0 1 1 9 11 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 DELISTED LST Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 UST Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 UST CLOSURE y 0.25 0 0 3 - 3 HHSS Y 0.25 0 1 4 5 UST SWEEPS Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 AST Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 AST SWRCB Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 TANK OIL GAS Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 DELISTED TNK Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 CERS TANK Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 DELISTED CTNK Y 0.25 0 0 3 - 3 HIST TANK Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 LUR Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 CALSITES Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 HLUR erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 -1147 10/3/2023 Database Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 DEED Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 VCP Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 CLEANUP SITES Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 DELISTED COUNTY Tribal Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 INDIAN LUST Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 INDIAN UST Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 DELISTED ILST Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 DELISTED IUST County Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 ICP ORANGE LOP ORANGE Y 0.5 0 0 0 4 4 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 NPUT ORANGE Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 UST ORANGE Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 AST ORANGE Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 UST CLP ANAHEIM Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 UST ANAHEIM Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 AST ANAHEIM Additional Environmental Records Federal Y PO 0 1 - 1 FINDS/FRS TRIS Y PO 0 - - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 PFAS TRI Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 PFAS NPL Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 PFAS SSEHRI Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 PFAS WATER Y 0.125 0 0 - - 0 HMIRS y 0.125 0 0 0 NCDL Y 0.125 0 0 0 TSCA Y 0.125 0 0 0 HIST TSCA Y PO 0 - 0 FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP Y PO 0 0 Y PO 0 - - - 0 PRP Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 SCRD DRYCLEANER erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1148 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Database Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni Y PO 0 - - 0 ICIS Y 0.25 0 0 1 1 FED DRYCLEANERS y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 DELISTED FED DRY Y 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 FUDS Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 FORMER NIKE Y PO 0 - - - - 0 PIPELINE INCIDENT y PO 0 - 0 MILTS y PO o 0 HIST MLTS y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 MINES Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 SMCRA Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 MRDS Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 URANIUM y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 ALT FUELS y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 SSTS Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 PCB State DRYCLEANERS Y 0.25 0 0 5 5 Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 DELISTED DRYCLEANERS Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 DRYC GRANT y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 PFAS Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 1 PFAS GW Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 HWSS CLEANUP Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 DTSC HWF y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSP COMP ENF SCH Y 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 CHMIRS y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y PO 0 - 0 HIST CHMIRS HAZNET y PO 1 9 10 HIST MANIFEST Y PO 0 2 2 Y 0.125 0 0 0 HW TRANSPORT Y PO 0 - - 0 WASTE TIRE Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 MEDICAL WASTE y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 HIST CORTESE Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 CDO/CAO Y 0.125 0 2 - - 2 CERS HAZ erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1149 10/3/2023 Database Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 1 DELISTED HAZ Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 GEOTRACKER Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 MINE Y PO 0 - - - - 0 LIEN Y 0.25 0 0 0 0 WASTE DISCHG Y 0.25 0 1 0 1 EMISSIONS Y 0.125 0 0 - 0 CDL Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County Y 0.125 0 1 - - - 1 HW ORANGE Total: 1 25 41 24 24 115 PO — Property Only * Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1150 10/3/2023 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Key (mi/ft) 1 HAZNET THE COLTON COMPANY 525 CABRILLO PARK DR NNW 0.00 / 0.00 SANTA ANA CA 927015017 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Elev Diff Page (ft) Number 5 37 Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1151 10/3/2023 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number 2 HAZNET 1X TOWN CENTER 1901 EAST 4TH ST SUITE S 0.00 / 17.59 -2 37 - PLASA 100 SANTA ANNA CA 927050000 2 HAZNET COLTON CO 1901 E 4TH ST S 0.00 / 17.59 -2 37 - SANTA ANA CA 927053918 2 HIST 1901 EAST 4TH ST SUITE S 0.00 / 17.59 -2 38 - MANIFEST 100 SANTA ANNA CA 927050000 3 HAZNET KNOX SERVICES 1971 EAST 4TH STREET SSE 0.00 / 18.68 1 39 - SANTA ANA CA 927050000 4 HAZNET KAISER 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 -2 39 - SANTA ANA CA 927010000 4 HAZNET KAISER FOUNDATION 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 -2 40 - HOSPITAL-SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA 927053962 MEDICAL OFFICES 4 HAZNET KAISER 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 -2 42 - SANTA ANA CA 927053910 4 HAZNET 1X K F HLTH PLAN INC 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 -2 43 - SANTA ANA CA 927010000 4 HIST 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 -2 44 - MANIFEST SANTA ANA CA 927010000 4 RCRA KAISER FOUNDATION 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 -2 44 - NON GEN HOSPITAL-SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA 92705-3962 MEDICAL OFFICES EPA Handler ID: CAL000188633 4 FINDS/FRS KAISER FOUNDATION 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 -2 46 - HOSPITAL-SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA 92705-3962 MEDICAL OFFICES Registry ID: 110070446876 5 HAZNET 1X SANTA ANA MEDICAL 1900 EAST 4TH STREET S 0.02 / 85.60 -2 46 - OFFICES/KAISER SANTA ANA CA 927050000 erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1152 10/3/2023 Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number 6 HAZNET GOLDEN CIRCLE 2001 E 4TH SE 0.02 / 1 47 CHIROPRACTIC SANTA ANA CA 927050000 101.74 7 RCRA HY5 LLC 2001 E. 4TH STREET SE 0.02 / 1 47 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92705 104.60 EPA Handler ID: CAC003129996 8 RECYCLING DUBITEC AMERICA INC 2000 E 4TH ST SE 0.03 / -2 49 SANTA ANA CA 92705 132.15 8 PROCESSORS DUBITEC AMERICA INC 2000 E 4TH ST SE 0.03 / -2 49 SANTA ANA CA 92705 132.15 9 RCRA ENVIROTECH 1801 E PARKCOURT PL UNIT WNW 0.04 / 1 49 NON GEN 120 226.96 SANTA ANA CA 92701-5002 EPA Handler ID: CAD983615998 10 LUST AMERICAN RED CROSS 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR ENE 0.06 / 3 51 SANTA ANA CA 92705 337.62 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605900666 I COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 4/1/1999 10 EMISSIONS ONAN-CUMMINS POWER 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR. ENE 0.06 / 3 53 SANTA ANA CA 337.62 10 UST AMERICAN RED CROSS- 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR ENE 0.06 / 3 53 SWEEPS ORANGE CNTY SANTA ANA CA 337.62 C C I Status: A30-020-327 I ACTIVE Tank ID: 000001 11 CERS 1750 Acquisitions Partners 1750 E 4TH ST SW 0.07 / -3 54 HAZ SANTA ANA CA 92705 386.09 11 RCRA CALTRANS DISTRICT 12 1750 E FOURTH STREET SW 0.07 / -3 55 NON GEN EA 12-OK0214 SANTA ANA CA 92705 386.09 EPA Handler ID: CAL000459466 12 HW S & N LABS 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 ESE 0.08 / 0 56 ORANGE SANTA ANA CA 92705 401.11 12 RCRA S&N LABS INC 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 ESE 0.08 / 0 57 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92705 401.11 EPA Handler ID: CAL000432860 12 CERS S&N Labs, Inc. 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 ESE 0.08 / 0 58 HAZ SANTA ANA CA 92705 401.11 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1153 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number 13 RCRA JASON STRUBBE 722 N MANTLE NW 0.14 / 3 59 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 734.33 EPA Handler ID: CAC003083732 14 RCRA COURTNEY BELZANO 1905 E.FRUIT ST N 0.15 / 11 60 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 776.31 EPA Handier ID: CAC003122201 15 RCRA YIHUA LEE 1909 E FRUIT ST N 0.15 / 11 61 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 776.63 EPA Handler ID: CAC003131526 16 RCRA HIRAM DON 1907 E FRUIT ST N 0.15 / 12 62 TSD SANTA ANA CA 92701 783.74 EPA Handler ID: CAC003012754 16 RCRA HIRAM DON 1907 E FRUIT ST N 0.15 / 12 63 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 783.74 EPA Handler ID: CAC003012754 17 UST AMERICAN RED CROSS 600 N PARKCENTER DR ENE 0.15 / 2 64 SWEEPS SANTA ANA CA 805.63 C C I Status: A30-020-424 I ACTIVE Tank ID: 000001 18 RCRA LAKE DIANNE 750 PARK CENTER DR ENE 0.15 / 5 65 NON GEN APARTMENTS Al49 SANTA ANA CA 92705 806.23 EPA Handier ID: CAC003102932 19 RCRA LAKE DIANE 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE ENE 0.15 / 2 66 TSD APARTMENTS UNIT A120 & A134 806.91 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003008026 19 RCRA LAKE DIANE 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE ENE 0.15 / 2 67 NON GEN APARTMENTS UNIT A120 & A134 806.91 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003008026 20 RCRA XEROX CENTRE 1851 E FIRST ST STE 855 SSW 0.15 / -7 68 SQG PARTNERS SANTA ANA CA 92705-3949 817.25 EPA Handler ID: CA0000381905 21 RCRA MARCELINO SALGADO 806 N MANTLE LANE NW 0.16 / 5 69 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 843.04 EPA Handler ID: CAC003110235 22 DRYCLEANERS SNOWHITE CLEANERS 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al SSE 0.16 / -7 70 SANTA ANA CA 927054040 857.20 22 DRYCLEANERS NEW CLEANERS 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al SSE 0.16 / -7 70 SANTA ANA CA 927054040 857.20 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1154 10/3/2023 Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number 22 DRYCLEANERS SNOW WHITE 2031 1ST ST #A1 SSE 0.16 / -7 71 CLEANERS SANTA ANA CA 927050000 857.20 22 DRYCLEANERS SNOW WHITE DRY 2031 E FIRST ST STE Al SSE 0.16 / -7 71 CLEANERS INC SANTA ANA CA 92705 857.20 42 DRYCLEANERS NEW CLEANERS 2031 E 1 ST ST #A1 SSE 0.16 / -7 71 SANTA ANA CA 92705 857.20 22 RCRA NEW CLEANERS 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al SSE 0.16 / -7 72 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92705-4040 857.20 EPA Handler ID: CAL000342036 22 FED NEW CLEANERS 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al SSE 0.16 / -7 73 DRYCLEANERS SANTA ANA CA 92705 857.20 FRS Facility ID: 110070472865 23 RCRA FREEWAY AUTO BODY 2000 E FIRST ST SSE 0.19 / -8 73 SQG SANTA ANA CA 92704 1,004.50 EPA Handler ID: CAD981158967 23 RCRA SANTA ANA CHR PLY & 2000 E FIRST ST SSE 0.19 / -8 74 SQG ISUZU SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,004.50 EPA Handier ID: CAD981692155 24 RCRA ARDITH CHAFFEE 913 DAYNA ST NNE 0.20 / 13 75 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,070.55 EPA Handier ID: CAC003086841 25 LUST SANTA ANA FIRE 1688 EAST 4TH STREET WSW 0.21 / -5 77 STATION NO. 2 SANTA ANA CA 1,109.69 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605981039 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 11/26/2002 25 HHSS FIRE STATION 2 1688 E. FOURTH WSW 0.21 / -5 81 SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,109.69 25 HIST FIRE STATION #2 1688 E. FOURTH WSW 0.21 / -5 81 TANK SANTA ANA CA 1,109.69 25 UST FIRE STATION #2 1688 E 4TH ST WSW 0.21 / -5 81 SWEEPS SANTA ANA CA 1,109.69 C C I Status: A30-020-313 I ACTIVE Tank ID: 000001 26 RCRA CALIFORNIA 2212 E 4TH ST ESE 0.22 / 2 82 NON GEN COMMERCIAL- ST. SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,138.71 JOSEPH EPA Handler ID: CAC003069289 erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1155 10/3/2023 Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number 26 RCRA ST. JOSEPH HERITAGE 2212 E 4TH ST ESE 0.22 / 2 83 NON GEN MEDICAL GROUP SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,138.71 EPA Handler ID: CAC003064975 27 HHSS 92631 1814 E FIRST ST SSW 0.22 / -9 84 SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,140.04 27 HIST 92631 1814 E FIRST ST SSW 0.22 / -9 84 TANK SANTA ANA CA 1,140.04 27 UST 92631 1814 E 1 ST ST SSW 0.22 / -9 84 SWEEPS SANTA ANA CA 1,140.04 C C I Status: 130-020-62295 1 INACTIVE Tank ID: 000002, 000004, 000005, 000001, 000003 28 RCRA MOUSA SAADALLA 802 MABURY ST WNW 0.22 / 6 85 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,169.26 EPA Handler ID: CAC003072486 29 RCRA LORA & JOHN 925 DAYNA ST NNE 0.23 / 13 86 NON GEN ALVARADO SANTA ANA CA 92701-4421 1,193.60 EPA Handler ID: CAC003033318 30 ENVIROSTOR COMPAK FOODS SW 0.23 / -9 87 SANTA ANA CA 1,205.36 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 800009991 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 8/14/2018 30 FUDS COMPAK FOODS SW 0.23 / -9 88 SANTA ANA CA 1,205.36 FUDS Property No: J09CA7358 31 HHSS SANTA ANA 301 N MABURY ST SW 0.23 / -10 89 SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,239.16 31 HIST SANTA ANA 301 N MABURY ST SW 0.23 / -10 89 TANK SANTA ANA CA 1,239.16 31 UST SANTA ANA 301 N MABURY ST SW 0.23 / -10 89 SWEEPS SANTA ANA CA 1,239.16 C C I Status: A30-020-68105 I ACTIVE Tank ID: 000002, 000001 32 RCRA SANTA ANA FIRE DEPT 1668 E FOURTH STREET WSW 0.23 / -5 90 SQG STATION #2 SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,240.16 EPA Handler ID: CAD981572928 33 RCRA JANELLE SANDERS 919 DIANNE STREET NE 0.24 / 12 91 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,242.44 EPA Handler ID: CAC003113672 34 RCRA DIXIE HESSON 1131 CABRILLO PARK DR NNW 0.24 / 11 92 NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,284.02 erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1156 10/3/2023 Map DB Key 35 RCRA NON GEN 36 LUST 36 RCRA TSD 87 RCRA TSD 38 LUST 89 RCRA TSD 40 LUST 40 LUST 41 RCRA TSD 42 LUST 43 LOP ORANGE 44 LUST 44 LUST Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page (mi/ft) (ft) Number EPA Handler ID: CAC003087731 HENRY RUCKER 1062 CABRILLO PARK B- NNW 0.25 / 11 93 UNIT A 1,301.02 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handier ID: CAC00312671 0 SHELL OIL SERVICE 320 TUSTIN AVENUE, N. ESE 0.25 / 2 94 STATION (FORMER SANTA ANA CA 1,335.24 TEXACO) Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605953807 I COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 1/6/2005 LEGTION AUTO 320 N TUSTIN AVE ESE 0.25 / 2 101 SERVICES SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,335.24 EPA Handler ID: CAL000445221 A RISING BUILDERS 2202 E 1ST STREET SE 0.27 / -6 102 ORANGE CA 92705 1,403.40 EPA Handler ID: CAC003007418 SANTA ANA HONDA 2114 E 1 ST ST SE 0.27 / -7 103 SANTA ANA CA 92707 1,432.64 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605901901 I COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 6/5/1996 JOHN GALLIE 1109 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE NNW 0.27 / 12 106 SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,441.33 EPA Handler ID: CAC003020236 SHELL OIL PRODUCTS 401 N. TUSTIN AVENUE E 0.29 / 4 107 US SANTA ANA CA 1,541.03 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605934780 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 12/23/2013 SHELL #401 401 N TUSTIN AVE E 0.29 / 4 123 SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,541.03 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605900685 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 5/9/1991 MARYAM GHASEMYEH 801 N TUSTIN AVE STE 400 ENE 0.30 / 11 126 DDS SANTA ANA CA 92705-0000 1,562.32 EPA Handier ID:CAL000224454 CHEVRON #9-7601 325 TUSTIN AVE. N ESE 0.30 / 2 127 SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,580.02 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605990440 I COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 7/24/2006 SHELL STATION 889 N TUSTIN AVE ENE 0.32 / 12 133 ORANGE CA 92866 1,689.89 Record ID I Case Closed Date I Type of Closure: R00003172 1 4/12/2004 1 Closure certification issued THRIFTY OIL 101 TUSTIN ESE 0.32 / -2 134 TUSTIN CA 92680 1,692.59 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605900843 I COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 3/11/1998 THRIFTY OIL 101 TUSTIN ESE 0.32 / -2 135 TUSTIN CA 92680 1,692.59 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1157 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605941193 I COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 4/18/1991 44 LOP THRIFTY OIL 101 N TUSTIN AVE ESE 0.32 / -2 137 ORANGE TUSTIN CA 92680 1,692.59 Record ID I Case Closed Date I Type of Closure: R00002908 1 4/18/1991 1 Closure certification issued 44 LOP THRIFTY OIL 101 N TUSTIN AVE ESE 0.32 / -2 138 ORANGE TUSTIN CA 92680 1,692.59 Record ID I Case Closed Date I Type of Closure: R00001561 1 3/11 /1998 1 Closure certification issued 45 RCRA AHLC SANTA ANA 2110 E 1ST ST SSE 0.34 / -10 138 TSD FAMILY, A CALIFORNIA SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,816.24 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EPA Handler ID: CAC003012035 46 DELISTED 7-ELEVEN # 34322 1640 E 1 ST ST SW 0.35 / -13 139 HAZ SANTA ANA CA 92701 1,838.19 47 ENVIROSTOR WESTERN MEDICAL 1001 N. TUSTIN AVENUE NE 0.36 / 17 139 CENTER - SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA 92705 1,882.71 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 710025741 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 48 RCRA BEATRIZ JAUREGUI 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE NNW 0.41 / 16 139 TSD UNIT P1 2,163.64 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003014003 48 RCRA MICHAEL TOMASELLO 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE NNW 0.41 / 16 141 TSD UNIT P-11 2,163.64 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003006686 49 LUST UNOCAL #4991 1601 E 1 ST ST WSW 0.42 / -12 142 SANTA ANA CA 92701 2,203.05 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605902028 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 8/1/2007 50 LUST MOBIL #18-LW8 17241 IRVINE E 0.45 / 7 180 TUSTIN CA 92680 2,374.91 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605901789 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 4/1/1996 50 LOP MOBIL #18-LW8 17241 IRVINE BLVD E 0.45 / 7 182 ORANGE TUSTIN CA 92680 2,374.91 Record ID I Case Closed Date I Type of Closure: R00001993 1 4/1/1996 1 Closure certification issued 51 RCRA VICTORIA RUTLEDGE 1345 N CABRILLO PARK DR NNW 0.45 / 22 183 TSD F-5 2,392.12 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003013492 52 PFAS SE 0.47 / -8 184 GW CA 2,496.67 53 SCH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FIRST STREET/TOWNSEND SW 0.50 / -16 188 NO. 5 STREET 2,650.75 SANTA ANA CA 92701 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1158 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 305900031 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 53 SCH REMINGTON 1325 EAST FOURTH STREET SW 0.50 / -16 189 ELEMENTARY SANTA ANA CA 92701 2,650.75 REDEVELOPMENT Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 30820004 1 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 53 ENVIROSTOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FIRST STREET/TOWNSEND SW 0.50 / -16 190 NO. 5 STREET 2,650.75 SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 305900031 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 53 ENVIROSTOR REMINGTON 1325 EAST FOURTH STREET SW 0.50 / -16 191 ELEMENTARY SANTA ANA CA 92701 2,650.75 REDEVELOPMENT Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 308200041 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 54 ENVIROSTOR E. CHESTNUT SA 1538 E. CHESTNUT AVE SW 0.54 / -19 192 PROPERTY SANTA ANA CA 92701 2,873.52 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 600007321 REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY AS OF 7/11/2007 55 ENVIROSTOR AZTEC CLEANERS 1730 EAST 17TH STREET NNW 0.55 / 23 193 SANTA ANA CA 92701 2,906.76 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 307200141 REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY AS OF 4/30/2001 56 RCRA EECO 1441 EAST CHESTNUT SW 0.62 / -18 194 CORRACTS AVENUE 3,275.59 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAD008256349 56 SCH RAYMOND VILLA 1441 EAST CHESTNUT SW 0.62 / -18 202 SCHOOL AVENUE 3,275.59 SANTA ANA CA 92701-6318 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 303601881 REFER: RCRA AS OF 8/12/2002 56 ENVIROSTOR EECOINC 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SW 0.62 / -18 203 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 3,275.59 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 80001539 1 ACTIVE AS OF 1/1/2008 56 ENVIROSTOR RAYMOND VILLA 1441 EAST CHESTNUT SW 0.62 / -18 207 SCHOOL AVENUE 3,275.59 SANTA ANA CA 92701-6318 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 303601881 REFER: RCRA AS OF 8/12/2002 56 ENVIROSTOR EECOINC 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SW 0.62 / -18 208 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 3,275.59 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: CAD008256349 1 56 HWP EECOINC 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SW 0.62 / -18 209 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 3,275.59 Estor/EPA ID: CAD008256349 57 ENVIROSTOR ORANGE COUNTY 625 N. GRAND AVENUE W 0.64 / -1 210 REGISTER THE SANTA ANA CA 92701 3,368.85 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 710029421 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1159 10/3/2023 Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number 58 ENVIROSTOR FORMER DRY CLEANER, NORTHEAST CORNER 17TH NNE 0.68 / 30 211 SANTA ANA, AND TUSTIN AVENUE 3,597.89 CALIFORNIA SANTA ANA CA 92705 Estor/EPA M I Cleanup Status: 60001948 1 ACTIVE AS OF 11/18/2013 59 ENVIROSTOR FREEWAY AUTO 1041 EAST 6TH STREET W 0.85 / -7 216 WRECKERS SANTA ANA CA 92709 4,479.30 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 309900031 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 8/4/2015 60 SCH RED HILL/VALENCIA K-5 RED HILL AVENUE/SANTA ESE 0.85 / -10 217 SCHOOL FE DRIVE 4,503.13 TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 309700141 NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 4/8/2004 61 ENVIROSTOR TUSTIN'S FRENCH 17301 17TH STREET NE 0.87 / 28 218 QUARTER SHOPPING TUSTIN CA 92780 4,573.89 CENTER Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 600013881 NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 10/31/2011 62 ENVIROSTOR WASHINGTON SANTA 1126 AND 1146 E WNW 0.87 / 7 219 ANA HOUSING WASHINGTON AVE 4,576.93 PARTNERS SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 60003099 1 ACTIVE AS OF 2/3/2021 63 ENVIROSTOR SO CAL GAS/SANTA ANA 111 SOUTH MINNIE STREET WSW 0.90 / -19 221 I (MINNIE ST) MGP SANTA ANA CA 92701 4,742.36 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 30490108 1 ACTIVE AS OF 7/18/2001 64 ENVIROSTOR DANNY K CLEANERS 1941 N. TUSTIN AVENUE NNE 0.91 / 40 225 (FORMER) SANTA ANA CA 92705 4,797.14 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 60002324 1 CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLY AS OF 2/9/2021 65 ENVIROSTOR BREAK -FREE, INC. 1035 S. LINWOOD AVENUE SSW 0.96 / -37 227 SANTA ANA CA 92705 5,052.41 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 302805351 REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY AS OF 3/15/2000 66 ENVIROSTOR 7-ELEVEN STORE NO. 16791 MCFADDEN AVENUE S 0.97 / -33 228 13799 TUSTIN CA 92780 5,104.90 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 60003062 1 ACTIVE AS OF 11/13/2020 67 ENVIROSTOR QUICK QUALITY 16795 E. MCFADDEN SSE 0.98 / -33 230 CLEANERS AVENUE 5,175.94 TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 307200081 REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY AS OF 3/6/2001 68 ENVIROSTOR FORMER TOM'S TRUCK 936 EAST 3RD STREET W 0.99 / -15 230 CENTER/RICE AUTO SANTA ANA CA 92701 5,201.45 PARTS Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 600027351 INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED AS OF 7/27/2020 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1160 10/3/2023 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard Federal RCRA CORRACTS - RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action A search of the RCRA CORRACTS database, dated Aug 30, 2021 has found that there are 1 RCRA CORRACTS site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key EECO 1441 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE SW 0.62 / 3,275.59 56 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAD008256349 RCRA TSD - RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities A search of the RCRA TSD database, dated Aug 30, 2021 has found that there are 10 RCRA TSD site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key HIRAM DON 1907 E FRUIT ST N 0.15 / 783.74 16 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003012754 LAKE DIANE APARTMENTS 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE UNIT Al20 ENE 0.15 / 806.91 19 & Al34 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003008026 LEGTION AUTO SERVICES 320 N TUSTIN AVE ESE 0.25 / 1,335.24 36 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAL000445221 JOHN GALLIE 1109 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE NNW 0.27 / 1,441.33 39 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003020236 MARYAM GHASEMYEH DDS 801 N TUSTIN AVE STE 400 ENE 0.30 / 1,562.32 41 SANTA ANA CA 92705-0000 EPA Handler ID: CAL000224454 MICHAEL TOMASELLO 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE UNIT P- NNW 0.41 / 2,163.64 48 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003006686 BEATRIZ JAUREGUI 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE UNIT NNW 0.41 / 2,163.64 48 P1 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003014003 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 -1161 10/3/2023 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key VICTORIA RUTLEDGE 1345 N CABRILLO PARK DR F-5 NNW 0.45 / 2,392.12 51 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003013492 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key A RISING BUILDERS 2202 E 1ST STREET SE 0.27 / 1,403.40 37 ORANGE CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003007418 AHLC SANTA ANA FAMILY, A 2110 E 1ST ST SSE 0.34 / 1,816.24 45 CALIFORNIA LIMITED SANTA ANA CA 92705 PARTNERSHIP EPA Handler ID: CAC003012035 RCRA SQG - RCRA Small Quantity Generators List A search of the RCRA SQG database, dated Aug 30, 2021 has found that there are 4 RCRA SQG site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key XEROX CENTRE PARTNERS 1851 E FIRST ST STE 855 SSW 0.15 / 817.25 20 SANTA ANA CA 92705-3949 EPA Handler ID: CA0000381905 SANTA ANA CHR PLY & ISUZU 2000 E FIRST ST SSE 0.19 / 1,004.50 23 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAD981692155 FREEWAY AUTO BODY 2000 E FIRST ST SSE 0.19 / 1,004.50 23 SANTA ANA CA 92704 EPA Handler ID: CAD981158967 SANTA ANA FIRE DEPT 1668 E FOURTH STREET WSW 0.23 / 1,240.16 32 STATION #2 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAD981572928 RCRA NON GEN - RCRA Non -Generators A search of the RCRA NON GEN database, dated Aug 30, 2021 has found that there are 21 RCRA NON GEN site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft� Map Key HY5 LLC 2001 E. 4TH STREET SE 0.02 / 104.60 7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003129996 ENVIROTECH 1801 E PARKCOURT PL UNIT 120 WNW 0.04 / 226.96 9 SANTA ANA CA 92701-5002 EPA Handler ID: CAD983615998 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1162 10/3/2023 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key JASON STRUBBE 722 N MANTLE NW 0.14 / 734.33 13 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003083732 COURTNEY BELZANO 1905 E.FRUIT ST N 0.15 / 776.31 14 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003122201 YIHUA LEE 1909 E FRUIT ST N 0.15 / 776.63 15 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003131526 HIRAM DON 1907 E FRUIT ST N 0.15 / 783.74 16 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003012754 LAKE DIANNE APARTMENTS 750 PARK CENTER DR ENE 0.15 / 806.23 18 A149 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003102932 LAKE DIANE APARTMENTS 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE UNIT Al20 ENE 0.15 / 806.91 19 & Al34 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003008026 MARCELINO SALGADO 806 N MANTLE LANE NW 0.16 / 843.04 21 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003110235 ARDITH CHAFFEE 913 DAYNA ST NNE 0.20 / 1,070.55 24 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003086841 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL- ST. 2212 E 4TH ST ESE 0.22 / 1,138.71 26 JOSEPH SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003069289 ST. JOSEPH HERITAGE 2212 E 4TH ST ESE 0.22 / 1,138.71 26 MEDICAL GROUP SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003064975 MOUSA SAADALLA 802 MABURY ST WNW 0.22 / 1,169.26 28 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003072486 LORA & JOHN ALVARADO 925 DAYNA ST NNE 0.23 / 1,193.60 29 SANTA ANA CA 92701-4421 EPA Handler ID: CAC003033318 JANELLE SANDERS 919 DIANNE STREET NE 0.24 / 1,242.44 33 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003113672 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1163 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key DIXIE HESSON 1131 CABRILLO PARK DR NNW 0.24 / 1,284.02 34 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003087731 HENRY RUCKER 1062 CABRILLO PARK B-UNIT A NNW 0.25 / 1,301.02 35 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003126710 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key KAISER FOUNDATION 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 4 HOSPITAL-SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA 92705-3962 MEDICAL OFFICES EPA Handier ID: CAL000188633 CALTRANS DISTRICT 12 EA 12- 1750 E FOURTH STREET SW 0.07 / 386.09 11 OK0214 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handier ID: CAL000459466 S&N LABS INC 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 ESE 0.08 / 401.11 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handier ID: CAL000432860 NEW CLEANERS 2031 E 1ST ST STE Al SSE 0.16 / 857.20 22 SANTA ANA CA 92705-4040 EPA Handier ID: CAL000342036 State ENVIROSTOR - EnviroStor Database A search of the ENVIROSTOR database, dated Sep 15, 2021 has found that there are 20 ENVIROSTOR site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER - 1001 N. TUSTIN AVENUE NE 0.36 / 1,882.71 47 SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA 92705 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 710025741 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF AZTEC CLEANERS 1730 EAST 17TH STREET NNW 0.55 / 2,906.76 55 SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 307200141 REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCYAS OF 413012001 FORMER DRY CLEANER, SANTA NORTHEAST CORNER 17TH AND NNE 0.68 / 3,597.89 58 ANA, CALIFORNIA TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92705 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 60001948 1 ACTIVE AS OF 1111812013 TUSTIN'S FRENCH QUARTER 17301 17TH STREET NE 0.87 / 4,573.89 61 SHOPPING CENTER TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 600013881 NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 1013112011 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1164 10/3/2023 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key WASHINGTON SANTA ANA 1126 AND 1146 E WASHINGTON AVE WNW 0.87 / 4,576.93 62 HOUSING PARTNERS SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 60003099 1 ACTIVE AS OF 21312021 DANNY K CLEANERS (FORMER) 1941 N. TUSTIN AVENUE NNE 0.91 / 4,797.14 64 SANTA ANA CA 92705 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 600023241 CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLYAS OF 21912021 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key COMPAK FOODS SW 0.23 / 1,205.36 30 SANTA ANA CA Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 800009991 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 811412018 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NO. 5 FIRST STREET/TOWNSEND STREET SW 0.50 / 2,650.75 53 SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 305900031 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 911212005 REMINGTON ELEMENTARY 1325 EAST FOURTH STREET SW 0.50 / 2,650.75 53 REDEVELOPMENT SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 308200041 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 911212005 E. CHESTNUT SA PROPERTY 1538 E. CHESTNUT AVE SW 0.54 / 2,873.52 54 SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA /D I Cleanup Status: 600007321 REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCYAS OF 711112007 EECOINC 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SW 0.62 / 3,275.59 56 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 80001539 1 ACTIVE AS OF 11112008 RAYMOND VILLA SCHOOL 1441 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE SW 0.62 / 3,275.59 56 SANTA ANA CA 92701-6318 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 303601881 REFER: RCRA AS OF 811212002 EECOINC 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SW 0.62 / 3,275.59 56 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: CAD008256349 1 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 625 N. GRAND AVENUE W 0.64 / 3,368.85 57 THE SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 710029421 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF FREEWAY AUTO WRECKERS 1041 EAST 6TH STREET W 0.85 / 4,479.30 59 SANTA ANA CA 92709 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 309900031 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 8/4/2015 SO CAL GAS/SANTA ANA 1 111 SOUTH MINNIE STREET WSW 0.90 / 4,742.36 63 (MINNIE ST) MGP SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 30490108 1 ACTIVE AS OF 711812001 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1165 10/3/2023 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key BREAK -FREE, INC. 1035 S. LINWOOD AVENUE SSW 0.96 / 5,052.41 65 SANTA ANA CA 92705 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 302805351 REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCYAS OF 311512000 7-ELEVEN STORE NO. 13799 16791 MCFADDEN AVENUE S 0.97 / 5,104.90 66 TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 60003062 1 ACTIVE AS OF 1111312020 QUICK QUALITY CLEANERS 16795 E. MCFADDEN AVENUE SSE 0.98 / 5,175.94 67 TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 307200081 REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCYAS OF 31612001 FORMER TOM'S TRUCK 936 EAST 3RD STREET W 0.99 / 5,201.45 68 CENTER/RICE AUTO PARTS SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID I Cleanup Status: 600027351 INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED AS OF 712712020 HWP - EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities A search of the HWP database, dated Sep 15, 2021 has found that there are 1 HWP site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key EECOINC 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SW 0.62 / 3,275.59 56 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 Estor/EPA ID: CAD008256349 RECYCLING - Recycling Centers A search of the RECYCLING database, dated Nov 2, 2020 has found that there are 1 RECYCLING site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key DUBITEC AMERICA INC 2000 E 4TH ST SE 0.03 / 132.15 8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 PROCESSORS - Listing of Certified Processors A search of the PROCESSORS database, dated Oct 27, 2020 has found that there are 1 PROCESSORS site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key DUBITEC AMERICA INC 2000 E 4TH ST SE 0.03 / 132.15 8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 LUST - Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports A search of the LUST database, dated Jun 22, 2021 has found that there are 11 LUST site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1166 10/3/2023 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key AMERICAN RED CROSS 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR ENE 0.06 / 337.62 10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605900666 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 141111999 SHELL OIL SERVICE STATION 320 TUSTIN AVENUE, N. ESE 0.25 / 1,335.24 36 (FORMER TEXACO) SANTA ANA CA Global ID I Status I Status Date: T06059538071 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 1/6/2005 SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US 401 N. TUSTIN AVENUE E 0.29 / 1,541.03 40 SANTA ANA CA Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605934780 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 12/23/2013 SHELL #401 401 N TUSTIN AVE E 0.29 / 1,541.03 40 SANTA ANA CA 92705 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605900685 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 151911991 CHEVRON #9-7601 325 TUSTIN AVE. N ESE 0.30 / 1,580.02 42 SANTA ANA CA 92705 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605990440 I COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 7/24/2006 MOBIL #18-LW8 17241 IRVINE E 0.45 / 2,374.91 50 TUSTIN CA 92680 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605901789 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 4/1/1996 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key SANTA ANA FIRE STATION NO. 1688 EAST 4TH STREET WSW 0.21 / 1,109.69 25 2 SANTA ANA CA Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605981039 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1 1112612002 SANTA ANA HONDA 2114 E 1ST ST SE 0.27 / 1,432.64 38 SANTA ANA CA 92707 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605901901 I COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 61511996 THRIFTY OIL 101 TUSTIN ESE 0.32 / 1,692.59 44 TUSTIN CA 92680 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605900843 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 3/11/1998 THRIFTY OIL 101 TUSTIN ESE 0.32 / 1,692.59 44 TUSTIN CA 92680 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605941193 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1411811991 UNOCAL #4991 1601 E 1ST ST WSW 0.42 / 2,203.05 49 SANTA ANA CA 92701 Global ID I Status I Status Date: T0605902028 1 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 181112007 HHSS - Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database A search of the HHSS database, dated Aug 27, 2015 has found that there are 3 HHSS site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 -1167 10/3/2023 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key FIRE STATION 2 1688 E. FOURTH WSW 0.21 / 1,109.69 25 SANTA ANA CA 92701 92631 1814 E FIRST ST SSW 0.22 / 1,140.04 27 SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA 301 N MABURY ST SW 0.23 / 1,239.16 31 SANTA ANA CA 92701 UST SWEEPS - Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System A search of the UST SWEEPS database, dated Oct 1, 1994 has found that there are 5 UST SWEEPS site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key AMERICAN RED CROSS- 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR ENE 0.06 / 337.62 10 ORANGE CNTY SANTA ANA CA C C I Status: A30-020-327 1 ACTIVE Tank ID: 000001 AMERICAN RED CROSS 600 N PARKCENTER DR ENE 0.15 / 805.63 17 SANTA ANA CA C C I Status: A30-020-424 I ACTIVE Tank ID: 000001 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key FIRE STATION #2 1688 E 4TH ST WSW 0.21 / 1,109.69 25 SANTA ANA CA C C I Status: A30-020-313 I ACTIVE Tank ID: 000001 92631 1814 E 1ST ST SSW 0.22 / 1,140.04 27 SANTA ANA CA C C I Status: 130-020-62295 1 INACTIVE Tank ID: 000002, 000004, 000005, 000001, 000003 SANTA ANA 301 N MABURY ST SW 0.23 / 1,239.16 31 SANTA ANA CA C C I Status: A30-020-68105 I ACTIVE Tank ID: 000002, 000001 HIST TANK - Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Container Information - Facility Summary A search of the HIST TANK database, dated May 27, 1988 has found that there are 3 HIST TANK site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key FIRE STATION #2 1688 E. FOURTH WSW 0.21 / 1,109.69 25 SANTA ANA CA erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1168 10/3/2023 Lower Elevation Address Direction 92631 1814 E FIRST ST SSW SANTA ANA CA SANTA ANA 301 N MABURY ST SW SANTA ANA CA Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 0.22 / 1,140.04 27 0.23 / 1,239.16 31 COunty LOP ORANGE - Orange County - LOP Lead Cases List A search of the LOP ORANGE database, dated Jul 9, 2021 has found that there are 4 LOP ORANGE site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key SHELL STATION 889 N TUSTIN AVE ENE 0.32 / 1,689.89 43 ORANGE CA 92866 Record ID i Case Closed Date Type of Closure: R00003172 1411212004 1 Closure certification issued MOBIL #18-LW8 17241 IRVINE BLVD E 0.45 / 2,374.91 50 TUSTIN CA 92680 Record ID i Case Closed Date Type of Closure: R00001993 1411119961 Closure certification issued Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key THRIFTY OIL 101 N TUSTIN AVE ESE 0.32 / 1,692.59 44 TUSTIN CA 92680 Record ID i Case Closed Date i Type of Closure: R00001561 1311111998 1 Closure certification issued THRIFTY OIL 101 N TUSTIN AVE ESE 0.32 / 1,692.59 44 TUSTIN CA 92680 Record ID i Case Closed Date i Type of Closure: R00002908 1 411811991 1 Closure certification issued Non Standard Federal FINDS/FRS - Facility Registry Service/Facility Index A search of the FINDS/FRS database, dated Nov 2, 2020 has found that there are 1 FINDS/FRS site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key KAISER FOUNDATION 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 4 HOSPITAL-SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA 92705-3962 MEDICAL OFFICES Registry ID: 110070446876 FED DRYCLEANERS - Drycleaner Facilities erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 -1169 10/3/2023 A search of the FED DRYCLEANERS database, dated May 5, 2021 has found that there are 1 FED DRYCLEANERS site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key NEW CLEANERS 2031 E 1ST ST STE Al SSE 0.16 / 857.20 22 SANTA ANA CA 92705 FRS Facility ID: 110070472865 FUDS - Formerly Used Defense Sites A search of the FUDS database, dated May 26, 2021 has found that there are 1 FUDS site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key COMPAK FOODS SW 0.23 / 1,205.36 30 SANTA ANA CA FUDS Property No: J09CA7358 State DRYCLEANERS - Dry Cleaning Facilities A search of the DRYCLEANERS database, dated Aug 27, 2021 has found that there are 5 DRYCLEANERS site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key NEW CLEANERS 2031 E 1ST ST #A1 SSE 0.16 / 857.20 22 SANTA ANA CA 92705 SNOWHITE CLEANERS SNOW WHITE CLEANERS 2031 E 1ST ST STE Al SANTA ANA CA 927054040 2031 1 ST ST #A1 SANTA ANA CA 927050000 SNOW WHITE DRY CLEANERS 2031 E FIRST ST STE Al INC SANTA ANA CA 92705 NEW CLEANERS 2031 E 1ST ST STE Al SANTA ANA CA 927054040 SSE 0.16 / 857.20 22 SSE 0.16 / 857.20 22 SSE 0.16 / 857.20 22 SSE 0.16 / 857.20 22 PFAS GW - PFOA/PFOS Groundwater A search of the PFAS GW database, dated Oct 22, 2020 has found that there are 1 PFAS GW site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1170 10/3/2023 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key SE 0.47 / 2,496.67 52 CA SCH - School Property Evaluation Program Sites A search of the SCH database, dated Sep 15, 2021 has found that there are 4 SCH site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key REMINGTON ELEMENTARY 1325 EAST FOURTH STREET SW 0.50 / 2,650.75 53 REDEVELOPMENT SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID i Cleanup Status: 308200041 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NO. 5 FIRST STREET/TOWNSEND STREET SW 0.50 / 2,650.75 53 SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID i Cleanup Status: 305900031 INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 911212005 RAYMOND VILLA SCHOOL 1441 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE SW 0.62 / 3,275.59 56 SANTA ANA CA 92701-6318 Estor/EPA ID i Cleanup Status: 303601881 REFER: RCRA AS OF 811212002 RED HILL/VALENCIA K-5 RED HILL AVENUE/SANTA FIE DRIVE ESE 0.85 / 4,503.13 60 SCHOOL TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID i Cleanup Status: 309700141 NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 41812004 HAZNET - Hazardous Waste Manifest Data A search of the HAZNET database, dated Oct 24, 2016 has found that there are 10 HAZNET site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key THE COLTON COMPANY 525 CABRILLO PARK DR NNW 0.00 / 0.00 1 SANTA ANA CA 927015017 KNOX SERVICES 1971 EAST 4TH STREET SSE 0.00 / 18.68 3 SANTA ANA CA 927050000 GOLDEN CIRCLE 2001 E 4TH SE 0.02 / 101.74 6 CHIROPRACTIC SANTA ANA CA 927050000 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 1X TOWN CENTER PLASA 1901 EAST 4TH ST SUITE 100 S 0.00 / 17.59 2 SANTA ANNA CA 927050000 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1171 10/3/2023 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key COLTON CO 1901 E 4TH ST S 0.00 / 17.59 2 SANTA ANA CA 927053918 KAISER 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 4 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 KAISER FOUNDATION 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 4 HOSPITAL-SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA 927053962 MEDICAL OFFICES KAISER 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 4 SANTA ANA CA 927053910 1X K F HLTH PLAN INC 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 4 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 1X SANTA ANA MEDICAL 1900 EAST 4TH STREET S 0.02 / 85.60 5 OFFICES/KAISER SANTA ANA CA 927050000 HIST MANIFEST - Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data A search of the HIST MANIFEST database, dated Dec 31, 1992 has found that there are 2 HIST MANIFEST site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 1901 EAST 4TH ST SUITE 100 S 0.00 / 17.59 2 SANTA ANNA CA 927050000 1900 E 4TH ST S 0.02 / 84.80 4 SANTA ANA CA 927010000 CERS HAZ - California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites A search of the CERS HAZ database, dated Sep 24, 2021 has found that there are 2 CERS HAZ site(s) within approximately 0.12 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 1750 Acquisitions Partners 1750 E 4TH ST Sw 0.07 / 386.09 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 S&N Labs, Inc. 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 ESE 0.08 / 401.11 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1172 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 DELISTED HAZ - Delisted Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites A search of the DELISTED HAZ database, dated Nov 29, 2018 has found that there are 1 DELISTED HAZ site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 7-ELEVEN # 34322 1640 E 1ST ST SW 0.35 / 1,838.19 46 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EMISSIONS - Toxic Pollutant Emissions Facilities A search of the EMISSIONS database, dated Dec 31, 2019 has found that there are 1 EMISSIONS site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key ONAN-CUMMINS POWER 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR. ENE 0.06 / 337.62 10 SANTA ANA CA COunty HW ORANGE - Orange County - Hazardous Waste Facilities A search of the HW ORANGE database, dated Jul 9, 2021 has found that there are 1 HW ORANGE site(s) within approximately 0.12 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key S & N LABS 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 ESE 0.08 / 401.11 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1173 10/3/2023 117051'30"W 117°51'W 117°50'30"W 117°50'W 117°49'30"W z z in Fairhaven E Buffalo -Ave' m _>, — ' y R ° E Avalon Ave E Avalon -Aver ^' 3 1 ' - - - " ou0 ��i i Portola.Ave Catalina Ave- `. Catalina -Ave o ffII C Portola Park `. E 21st St °' = I Em a)♦ ♦ Meredith Parkwood-64 o > D Z � > .> E 21 st St �� CL E 20th St m — Q ♦ ♦ a n a ♦♦ a E 20th St11�J} o to E19thSt o in o v) o w� o E 19th St, E 20th St d M ♦ ti �� 3 E.19th St a v ♦ r_ E 18th St �J N�IU ��n o ♦ Z Il. O E 17th St E 17th St 2. z E 17th St E 17th St �.�. aas J.z: ♦ ❑� �� a�E16thSt > el f� IL-NN 55 Q E 15th S�tcE 1.5_th S-t, _ ICE 15th S t E 14th St E 94th-St' a u`Yy Pad ma / Ju CD in L ga + E Washi;gton Ave n E Wllellingiiiito ..�. r ♦ cn rn h q ve 1 �339�1I 8y © J - - :z r = ��v d std}f �nz� � a47 r fn 0a I) Jn ,IIIII-::> orb ♦ ♦ a 0 1 to P —1� �C7ui11 St C m m a� ♦ E Fruit+St 0 �• ES E Fruit St -C`► �� pz7a 2Z1 441 ♦ ♦ ,as Sta d d l e b a c w N s51t aL'j 1 1 1 99 Q 1 r 1 E 6th St '�ici 1 - ©' - LjU:7m,r > 5th St 1' �m4 ) 1�1, 1�m,11aa m,3ro 1�:- E 4th St 1. ._�❑ 1 m2aoyc/3 ) 1 m �; 1 1 ms6 ma$attl ♦ 0 0 t {SL1� Ue}� j1 Palm St ♦♦ ♦ 55 E 2nd St r1�i Z - N % a419 ,��m3 , z )V ♦, m / E 1st S, = E 1st St E 1st St m♦` VX3) r` W c �V WalnutlSt Walnut jE - E StJ �iJl ,jl-9j .� - - Y 45 E Pine"S-tJ �iIJ u1\\' s a) w - - - I i' m ) V) —0 s E Chestnutve A i �.. V �� Prentice Park L _ 1 , J Q to L— - m, _ - OF Ale E Bishop St m ? `St Warren Stm arrenStm W: U do > ♦ rnI I1LJLAL o -10= u o �Netone CI), e < E—I'U ' `6 E Wakeham Ave d f nn U R y ♦, ��� � � J� II�� i ca m Beveirly_-PIS?. 'E lilUI11111FF_ I� �`� m- N a E Normandy PI `�, Harwood PI N , - ❑❑ s66s67 E McFadden Ave - - Miles fL rd Jt15 0 0.3bL�� Map: 1.0 Mile Radius Order Number: 21121600065 Address: Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Q Project Property' : ! Buffer Outline A Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Freeways; Highways State A Eris Sites with Same Elevation � Country Traffic Circle; Ramp 7. ♦ N �1 m ♦ i� 5� 5 �PJ McFadden Ave hQ� 1:1940611, E R S ® FWS Special Designation Areas Plume Eris Sites with Lower Elevation ® Major &Minor Arterial National Priority List Sites O Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation _ National Wetland ❑Eris Areas with Higher Elevation Traffic Circle; Ramp g ®Indian Reserve Land ❑ Eris Areas with Same Elevation Local Road Historic Fill Eris Areas with Lower Elevation Rail ® 100 Year Flood Zone Eris Areas with Unknown Elevation 500 Year Flood Zone City Council 18 —1174 10/3/2023 z Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. 117051'W 117°50'30"W 117°50'W Z a farg t s5n5 1 Superior, Grocers Z\China Town Express Albertsons Staples Bruegger's c E 15th St E 15th St J I 'i ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ m PETSMART —Jl' ... •' • E t • s5c1 � r ` � ' � E laths Mabury Park . ]V �+ 0 = I z > E WashingtogAve �L + •11 Z 17 LJE_� L- !I� '0�� 04 ' E Welling ti ooG > ♦♦ �� I l J 3 S Welli n Ave iL _L 1I�{ _1 L �o� ♦♦ �I cn O Cornwall Sq % c ° z J Stratford Ct o 'H a � Z � � 3a4 _ s � � Z �0 C N ♦ O `♦ a C U Cn t �d St z � � ♦t� ♦ m444AV) z mz ♦ a43 - I m E Fruit St 0 ♦ c• _ _ . Med Zone Pharmacy m f 211 r • • 441 Q- o � r^ � ♦ ♦ J_Il I� L � �� o 1 Patr • '��� a> Cabrillo Park ♦ �� — - 1 � d 2, 1 th1 1 m,a&�+ S S'+addleback View E 6St 1 ��;Latz1 S1 1 99 > 1 Q Jt 1 v) /� 1 E 6th Si 1 0 Trinidad Way " 1 a _ r�o� 1 1 z w E 5th St J� '� ; =InF- Patriots Federal Credib Union PS Store ma vs J 6� 7 ,g�p) 1 1 pr 1 Z f 4th St zlm33az 1 U � f qth St LSUBWAY 1 1- =_ �) 4th St 1 _--mA4202" 1 a92 1 1 '/ i ms5 ma�AAee&aa� v�r _ ,4 1 Palm St ♦,► '.. -• �� �� ll� . Sunshine Village ♦♦m3�1 ro+ ` . . • • 2244 El Cortez Lodge Z Motel 6-Santa Ana m3 m- E�1st St m- a� ♦♦- - E 1st $� IE 1st St E 1st St Lyon StrA -` ^-ro+ .I r� Royal Ro man Motel WSS metroPCS First Street Medical Plaza Phcy ♦ � � ` fn JLd �1 � r _ �J ♦ o W o �. ' N Donwest mom+ ♦ N Prentice Park I I ^.^�. Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park � _\'ass LL-=I % o :1 41nnt ! chestnut Ave E Main Stc��° E M ��•• o Mileda, a' C 3 = De Anza Ln 0.15 0.075 0 0.15 w W o 0 Li De Anza Map: 0.5 Mile Radius Order Number: 21121600065 Address: Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Q Project Property' : ! Buffer Outline A Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Freeways; Highways State A Eris Sites with Same Elevation � Country Traffic Circle; Ramp E R S 4 ® FWS Special Designation Areas Plume Eris Sites with Lower Elevation ® Major &Minor Arterial National Priority List Sites O Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation _ National Wetland Eris Areas with Higher Elevation Traffic Circle; Ramp g ®Indian Reserve Land O Eris Areas with Same Elevation Local Road Historic Fill Eris Areas with Lower Elevation Rail ® 100 Year Flood Zone Eris Areas with Unknown Elevation 7/Z 500 Year Flood Zone City Council 18 -1175 10/3/2023 Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. 117050'30"W a 0 0 V O 3„a4------------� c �` .•' �Q ``�. ri Z Z ♦ ♦ ♦ o , m4sk7 N Stafford St ♦ `� I)tltabury Park Z �# E Fruit St -- - - - --- ♦ . ' - . Med Zone Pharmacy z�1 ♦ ♦ M �-{ In 44y1 0 �St ,�♦ m 1 ��, ♦ "J 3� 1: Cabrillo Park ♦ 0� - 0 u> m,a8 1 Z �� 1 E 6th.'St 1 1 m,9 r s9 faourt PI 0 E 6th St ; - 1 1 1 O 01 1 M 0 V ; LPatriotQFFederal Credit Union J I u L1 1 z 1 1 1 m4) 1 1 0 ) m� 7m4.,7 m,t , 1 1 0 3 ,1c1a�) t__ 44 �c L 1 _ C °' ,'� ❑ C Palm St FF - v ��I 1LJ �, maaclxa) Xere7c.C�ttr- - - - - - - - - - - .o V ♦ — ao — 0 mzaam) � C Motel 6-Santa Ana , m=) Z u` E.:TSt-St ♦ _ = E jmz ) I ,. E tst gv V Lyon Street �I + First-StreetMedical Plaza Phcy ut l� F_ • ♦ a$$ metroPCF Prentice Park ' - - - - - - - - - ' • w 0.095 0.0475 0.095, 1 a4a mzQ > Q 1 C ❑_,� a m444,oi i �� ✓ c M Map: 0.25 Mile Radius Order Number: 21121600065 IEE R S Address: Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana, CA Q Project Property' : ! Buffer Outline A Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Freeways; Highways State ® FWS Special Designation Areas A Eris Sites with Same Elevation � Traffic Circle; Ramp Country Plume Eris Sites with Lower Elevation Major &Minor Arterial ® National Priority List Sites O Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation _ National Wetland Eris Areas with Higher Elevation Traffic Circle; Ramp g ®Indian Reserve Land O Eris Areas with Same Elevation Local Road Historic Fill Eris Areas with Lower Elevation Rail ® 100 Year Flood Zone Eris Areas with Unknown Elevation 500 Year Flood Zone City Council 18 —1176 10/3/2023 Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. z a fillA. ORO V A L70 117051'30"W 117°51'W 117°50'30"W 117°50'W 117°49'30"W 117°49'W z 0 z a z 0 �n a M Z M a Z FAIR HAVEN z�l V ~- EMORY_'LN � � _ � E FdIRNAVEN-AVE __➢ ! -Saint Johns Cerri_etery p t a III Fa}rhaven Memorial Park ❑ F z y ! i Santa p RAINIER-VR- o m J — Ana Cemetery 0 Trinity 5 Law•and E SANTA CLARA AVE E SANTA CLARA AVE + W w ti, 4 r eA R�`' t El Fj5T r 1 _q - F 14TN,ST7 VANDEN��"RG 3 E WELLINGTO& — � YTTI ORANGE 7RFE LN p� c TT F FRIfIT 5T � i 1 i� THEODORA DR :7-2 E t a AMAN5ET WAY 4111E7A WAY I— {- f f I} 1 f f , f 9TH ST IRVI NE BLVD - a E, 3Rii ST I(--- ' E 2ND ST E 15r sr - " 55 `w tsr r E 1sr sr _'x i t - E WALNUT 57 S PIN S7. E rxssrNUT AVE t _ ©� MYE. AIN ST,- _ W MAIN ' _RTL-E--ST r Iw - ST - - - o F CA wrLE sr. t z' W 6TH sr to F B15HOP T= + N 4 BEVERLY'PL i -+ } Z E MCFADOEN AVE -- _ MCFADr1FN AVF; Z � O ti wo H09ARTS7 _ r N F- r• .1} a 1 9 E` - - y - E:EDINGERAVE 'n -. - /'•, � q{�/ aft, 1 Aliso' �Villa Val Miles 1:24000 0.35 0.1751 0 � A A .35 till 1 tl o'fe� Topographic Map Year:2015 Address: Cabrillo Town Center, CA Quad rangle(s)CQ)p j (bunCA; Tustin, CA; Orange, CA; Newport Be*I-+,-(3478 Source: USGS Topographic Map Order Number: 21121600065 E R 5 1 WZM0 4formation Inc. Detail Report Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) 1 1 of 1 NNW 0.00 / 149.601 THE COLTON COMPANY 0.00 5 525 CABRILLO PARK DR HAZNET SANTA ANA CA 927015017 SIC Code: Mailing City. SANTA ANA NAICS Code: Mailing State: CA EPA ID: CAC002808112 Mailing Zip: 927015017 Create Date: 3/23/2015 Region Code: 4 Fac Act Ind: No Owner Name: JOE CAMPION Inact Date: 6/22/2015 Owner Addr 1: 525 CABRILLO PARK DR County Code: 30 Owner Addr 2: County Name: Orange Owner City: SANTA ANA Mail Name: Owner State: CA Mailing Addr 1: 525 CABRILLO PARK DR Owner Zip: 927015017 Mailing Addr 2: Owner Phone: 7145470800 Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: JOE CAMPION Street Address 1: 525 CABRILLO PARK DR Street Address 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA Zip: 927015017 Phone: 7145470800 2 1 of 3 S 0.00 / 142.171 1X TOWN CENTER PLASA 17.59 HAZNET -2 1901 EAST 4TH ST SUITE 100 SANTA ANNA CA 927050000 SIC Code: Mailing City: -- NAICS Code: Mailing State: 99 EPA ID: CAC000615008 Mailing Zip: 000000000 Create Date: 7/11/1991 Region Code: 4 Fac Act Ind: No Owner Name: CON. CAP. EQUITY PARTNER/21PART Inact Date: 10/25/2000 Owner Addr 1: County Code: 30 Owner Addr 2: County Name: Orange Owner City: -- Mail Name: Owner State: 99 Mailing Addr 1: SAME Owner Zip: -- Mailing Addr 2: Owner Phone: 0000000000 Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: CHRISTEE SAWYER PROP MANAGER Street Address 1: Street Address 2: City: -- State: 99 Zip: -- Phone: 7148358932 2 2 of 3 S 0.00 / 142.171 COLTON CO HAZNET erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1179 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) SIC Code: NAICS Code: EPA ID: CAC002606987 Create Date: 8/8/2006 Fac Act Ind: No Inact Date: 2/5/2007 County Code: 30 County Name: Orange Mail Name: Mailing Addr 1: 1901 E 4TH ST Mailing Addr 2: Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: DAVID COLTON Street Address 1: 1901 E 4TH ST Street Address 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA Zip: 927053918 Phone: 9494754200 17.59 -2 1901 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 927053918 Mailing City. SANTA ANA Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 927053918 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: DAVID COLTON Owner Addr 1: 1901 E 4TH ST Owner Addr 2: Owner City: SANTA ANA Owner State: CA Owner Zip: 927053918 Owner Phone: 9494754200 2 3 of 3 S 0.00 / 142.171 17.59 -2 Gen EPA ID: CAC000615008 Create Date: 07/11/1991 0:00 Inact Date: 10/25/2000 0:00:00 Facility Mail Street: SAME Facility Mail City: -- Facility Mail State: 99 Facility Mail Zip: 0 Contact Phone(s): 7148358932 File Year(s): 1992 Contact Name(s): CHRISTEE SAWYER PROP MANAGER Tanner Information Method Description: Tons: 0 Year. 1992 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County. Orange Method Code: Tsd County Code: 19 Tsd County: Los Angeles State Waste Code: State Waste Code Desc: Tsd Epa ID: CAT080011059 Tanner Information Method Description: Tons: 2.81 Year. 1992 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County. Orange Method Code: R01 Tsd County Code: 19 Tsd County. Los Angeles erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services 1901 EAST 4TH ST SUITE 100 SANTA ANNA CA 927050000 HIST MANIFEST Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1180 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) State Waste Code: 221 State Waste Code Desc: Waste oil and mixed oil Tsd Epa ID: CAT080011059 3 1of1 SIC Code: NAICS Code: EPA ID: Create Date: Fac Act Ind: Inact Date: County Code: County Name: Mail Name: Mailing Addr 1: Mailing Addr 2: Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: Street Address 1: Street Address 2: City: State: Zip: Phone: Tanner Information Generator EPA ID: Generator County Code: Generator County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County Code: TSD County: State Waste Code: State Waste Code Desc.: Method Code: Method Description: Tons: Year. 4 1 of 7 SIC Code: NAICS Code: EPA ID: Create Date: Fac Act Ind: Inact Date: County Code: County Name: Mail Name: Mailing Addr 1: Mailing Addr 2: Owner Fax: Contact Information SSE 0.00 / 18.68 CAL000131127 8/11 /1995 No 6/30/1998 30 Orange 2201 E FOURTH STREET PO BOX 11960 TERESA THOMPSON INACTIVE PER VQ98 - BMI SANTA ANA CA 927111960 7144791650 DB 145.071 KNOX SERVICES 1 1971 EAST HAZNET 4TH STREET SANTA ANA CA 927050000 Mailing City. SANTA ANA Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 927111960 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: KNOX SERVICES STEVE OLCH V P Owner Addr 1: 2201 E FOURTH STREET PO BOX 11960 Owner Addr 2: Owner City: SANTA ANA Owner State: CA Owner Zip: 927111960 Owner Phone: 7144791650 CAL000131127 30 Orange CAL000121946 21 Marin 541 Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste R01 Recycler 0.0175 1996 S 0.021 142.301 KAISER 84.80 -2 1900 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 927010000 Mailing City. PLACENTIA Mailing State: CA CAC002277737 Mailing Zip: 928700000 8/4/2000 Region Code: 4 No Owner Name: KAISER 6/11/2001 Owner Addr 1: 1707 BARSOLONA CIR 30 Owner Addr 2: Orange Owner City: PLACENTIA Owner State: CA 1707 BARSOLONA CIR Owner Zip: 928700000 Owner Phone: 7145725751 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services HAZNET Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1181 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Contact Name: BILL DAVIDSON Street Address 1: 1707 BARSOLONA CIR Street Address 2: City: PLACENTIA State: CA Zip: 928700000 Phone: 7145725751 Tanner Information Generator EPA ID: CAC002277737 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County. Orange TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County Code: 19 TSD County: Los Angeles State Waste Code: 241 State Waste Code Desc.: Tank bottom waste Method Code: R01 Method Description: Recycler Tons: 3.9615 Year: 2000 4 2of7 SIC Code: NAICS Code: EPA ID: Create Date: Fac Act Ind: Inact Date: County Code: County Name: Mail Name: Mailing Addr 1: Mailing Addr 2: Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: Street Address 1: Street Address 2: City: State: Zip: Phone: Tanner Information Generator EPA ID: Generator County Code: Generator County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County Code: TSD County: State Waste Code: State Waste Code Desc.: Method Code: Method Description: Tons: S 0.021 84.80 8011 621493 CAL000188633 7/23/1998 Yes 30 Orange NEHS 6TH FLOOR 1800 HARRISON ST MATTHEW J HURAY 1800 HARRISON ST OAKLAND CA 94612 3016257462 142.301 KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL- -2 SANTA ANA MEDICAL OFFICES 1900 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 927053962 Mailing City: OAKLAND Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 946120000 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: KAISER PERMANETE Owner Addr 1: ONE KAISER PLAZA Owner Addr 2: Owner City: OAKLAND Owner State: CA Owner Zip: 94612 Owner Phone: 5106254737 DB HAZNET CAL000188633 30 Orange TXD982560294 99 Unknown 141 Off -specification, aged or surplus inorganics H141 STORAGE, BULKING, AND/OR TRANSFER OFF SITE --NO TREATMENT/REOVERY (H010-H129) OR (H131- H 135) 0.0005 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1182 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Year. 2008 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County. Orange TSD EPA ID: CAD000013493 TSD County Code: TSD County: State Waste Code: 171 State Waste Code Desc.: Metal sludge (see 121) Method Code: R01 Method Description: Recycler Tons: 0.03 Year: 1998 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County: Orange TSD EPA ID: UTD981552177 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 181 State Waste Code Desc.: Other inorganic solid waste Method Code: H040 Method Description: INCINERATION --THERMAL DESTRUCTION OTHER THAN USE AS A FUEL Tons: 0.0075 Year. 2014 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County. Orange TSD EPA ID: UTD981552177 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 311 State Waste Code Desc.: Pharmaceutical waste Method Code: H040 Method Description: INCINERATION --THERMAL DESTRUCTION OTHER THAN USE AS A FUEL Tons: 0.01 Year. 2012 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County. Orange TSD EPA ID: UTD981552177 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 311 State Waste Code Desc.: Pharmaceutical waste Method Code: H040 Method Description: INCINERATION --THERMAL DESTRUCTION OTHER THAN USE AS A FUEL Tons: 0.004 Year: 2015 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County: Orange TSD EPA ID: TXD982560294 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 311 State Waste Code Desc.: Pharmaceutical waste Method Code: H129 Method Description: OTHER TREATMENT Tons: 0.0005 Year. 2009 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1183 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Generator County. Orange TSD EPA ID: ARD069748192 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 331 State Waste Code Desc.: Off -specification, aged or surplus organics Method Code: H040 Method Description: INCINERATION --THERMAL DESTRUCTION OTHER THAN USE AS A FUEL Tons: 0.005 Year. 2014 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County. Orange TSD EPA ID: TXD982560294 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 331 State Waste Code Desc.: Off -specification, aged or surplus organics Method Code: H129 Method Description: OTHER TREATMENT Tons: 0.002 Year: 2009 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County: Orange TSD EPA ID: TXD982560294 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 331 State Waste Code Desc.: Off -specification, aged or surplus organics Method Code: H141 Method Description: STORAGE, BULKING, AND/OR TRANSFER OFF SITE --NO TREATMENT/REOVERY (H010-H129) OR (H131- H 135) Tons: 0.0085 Year: 2008 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County: Orange TSD EPA ID: TXD982560294 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 791 State Waste Code Desc.: Liquids with pH <= 2 Method Code: H129 Method Description: OTHER TREATMENT Tons: 0.0005 Year. 2009 Generator EPA ID: CAL000188633 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County: Orange TSD EPA ID: TXD982560294 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 791 State Waste Code Desc.: Liquids with pH <= 2 Method Code: H141 Method Description: STORAGE, BULKING, AND/OR TRANSFER OFF SITE --NO TREATMENT/REOVERY (H010-H129) OR (H131- H 135) Tons: 0.0015 Year. 2008 4 3 of 7 S 0.021 142.301 KAISER HAZNET 84.80 -2 1900 E 4TH ST erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1184 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) SIC Code: NAICS Code: EPA ID: CAC002612593 Create Date: 1/24/2007 Fac Act Ind: No Inact Date: 7/24/2007 County Code: 30 County Name: Orange Mail Name: JUSTIN EMERICK Mailing Addr 1: 441 N LAKEVIEW AVE Mailing Addr 2: Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: JUSTIN EMERICK Street Address 1: 441 N LAKEVIEW AVE Street Address 2: City: ANAHEIM State: CA Zip: 928073028 Phone: 7142794867 Tanner Information Generator EPA ID: CAC002612593 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County. Orange TSD EPA ID: TXD982560294 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 352 State Waste Code Desc.: Other organic solids Method Code: Method Description: Tons: 0.003 Year: 2007 4 4of7 SIC Code: NAICS Code: EPA ID: Create Date: Fac Act Ind: Inact Date: County Code: County Name: Mail Name: Mailing Addr 1: Mailing Addr 2: Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: Street Address 1: Street Address 2: City: State: Zip: SANTA ANA CA 927053910 Mailing City: ANAHEIM Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 928073028 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: KAISER Owner Addr 1: 441 N LAKEVIEW AVE Owner Addr 2: Owner City: ANAHEIM Owner State: CA Owner Zip: 928073028 Owner Phone: 7142794867 S 0.021 142.301 1X K F HLTH PLAN /NC 84.80 -2 1900 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 927010000 Mailing City. LOS ANGELES Mailing State: CA CAC000594336 Mailing Zip: 900230000 5/6/1991 Region Code: 4 No Owner Name: CORP 10/25/2000 Owner Addr 1: 30 Owner Addr 2: Orange Owner City: -- Owner State: 99 Owner Zip: -- Owner Phone: 0000000000 HOULEMARD, JULIE/CONST CLK 99 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB HAZNET Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1185 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Phone: 2132644310 4 5 of 7 S 0.021 142.301 84.80 -2 Gen EPA ID: CAC000594336 Create Date: 05/06/1991 0:00 Inact Date: 10/25/2000 0:00:00 Facility Mail Street: -- Facility Mail City: LOS ANGELES Facility Mail State: CA Facility Mail Zip: 900230000 Contact Phone(s): 2132644310 File Year(s): 1991 Contact Name(s): HOULEMARD, JULIE/CONST CLK Tanner Information Method Description: Tons: 4.21 Year: 1991 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County: Orange Method Code: D80 Tsd County Code: 19 Tsd County: Los Angeles State Waste Code: 151 State Waste Code Desc: Asbestos containing waste Tsd Epa ID: CAD067786749 Tanner Information Method Description: Tons: 0 Year: 1991 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County: Orange Method Code: Tsd County Code: 19 Tsd County: Los Angeles State Waste Code: State Waste Code Desc: Tsd Epa ID: CAD067786749 1900 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 927010000 4 6 of 7 S 0.021 142.301 KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL- 84.80 -2 SANTA ANA MEDICAL OFFICES 1900 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92705-3962 EPA Handier ID: CAL000188633 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: CHRISTOPHER B AUSTIN Contact Address: 3440, EAST LA PALMA , , ANAHEIM , CA, 92806, US Contact Phone No and Ext. 714-644-7705 x7705 Contact Email: CHRISTOPHER.B.AUSTIN@KP.ORG Contact Country: US County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Private Receive Date: 20180228 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1186 DB HIST MANIFEST RCRA NON GEN Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20180228 Handler Name: KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL-SANTA ANA MEDICAL OFFICES Source Type: Annual/Biennial Report update with Notification Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Waste Code Details DB Hazardous Waste Code: 311 Waste Code Description: Pharmaceutical waste Hazardous Waste Code: D001 Waste Code Description: IGNITABLE WASTE Hazardous Waste Code: D005 Waste Code Description: BARIUM Hazardous Waste Code: D007 Waste Code Description: CHROMIUM Hazardous Waste Code: D011 Waste Code Description: SILVER Hazardous Waste Code: D013 Waste Code Description: LINDANE (1,2,3,4,5,6-HEXA-CHLOROCYCLOHEXANE, GAMMA ISOMER) Hazardous Waste Code: D033 Waste Code Description: HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE Hazardous Waste Code: P001 Waste Code Description: 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: 1900 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1187 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Type: Private Street 1: E 4TH ST Name: KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL Street 2: Date Became Current: 19790101 City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-644-7705 Country: US Source Type: Annual/Biennial Report update with Notification Zip Code: 92705-3962 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: 1 Type: Private Street 1: KAISER PLACE Name: KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL Street 2: Date Became Current: 19790101 City. OAKLAND Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-644-7705 Country: US Source Type: Annual/Biennial Report update with Notification Zip Code: 94612 4 7 of 7 S 0.021 142.301 KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL- 84.80 -2 SANTA ANA MEDICAL OFFICES 1900 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92705-3962 Registry ID: 110070446876 FIPS Code: 06059 HUC Code: Site Type Name: STATIONARY Location Description: Supplemental Location: Create Date: 02-JAN-19 Update Date: Interest Types: HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER, UNSPECIFIED UNIVERSE SIC Codes: SIC Code Descriptions: NAICS Codes: 621491 NAICS Code Descriptions: HMO MEDICAL CENTERS. Conveyor. Federal Facility Code: Federal Agency Name: Tribal Land Code: Tribal Land Name: Congressional Dist No: Census Block Code: EPA Region Code: 09 County Name: ORANGE US/Mexico Border Ind: Latitude: Longitude: Reference Point: Coord Collection Method: Accuracy Value: Datum: NAD83 Source: Facility Detail Rprt URL: https:Hofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110070446876 Program Acronyms: BR:CAL000188633, RCRAINFO:CAL000188633 5 1 of 1 S 0.021 142.301 1X SANTA ANA MEDICAL 85.60 -2 OFFICES/KAISER 1900 EAST 4TH STREET SANTA ANA CA 927050000 SIC Code: Mailing City. SANTA ANA NAICS Code: Mailing State: CA EPA ID: CAC000802160 Mailing Zip: 927050000 Create Date: 4/2/1993 Region Code: 4 Fac Act Ind. No Owner Name: KAISER erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services I hWATI-VA Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1188 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Inact Date: 10/25/2000 Owner Addr 1: County Code: 30 Owner Addr 2: County Name: Orange Owner City: -- Mail Name: Owner State: 99 Mailing Addr 1: 1900 EAST 4TH STREET Owner Zip: -- Mailing Addr 2: Owner Phone: 0000000000 Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: PERFORMANCE ABATEMENT Street Address 1: Street Address 2: City: -- State: 99 Zip: -- Phone: 7147448406 Tanner Information Generator EPA ID: CAC000802160 Generator County Code: 30 Generator County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAL000027741 TSD County Code: 05 TSD County: Calaveras State Waste Code: 151 State Waste Code Desc.: Asbestos containing waste Method Code: D80 Method Description: Disposal, landfill Tons: 16.856 Year: 1993 6 1 of 1 SE 0.021 145.231 GOLDEN CIRCLE CHIROPRACTIC 101.74 1 2001 E 4TH HAZNET SANTA ANA CA 927050000 SIC Code: Mailing City: CYPRESS NAICS Code: Mailing State: CA EPA ID: CAL000079006 Mailing Zip: 906300000 Create Date: 8/10/1993 Region Code: 4 Fac Act Ind: No Owner Name: WESLEY M MAEDO InactDate: 6/1/1996 Owner Addr 1: 4557 LEMON CIRCLE County Code: 30 Owner Addr 2: County Name: Orange Owner City: CYPRESS Mail Name: Owner State: CA Mailing Addr 1: 4557 LEMON CIRCLE Owner Zip: 906300000 Mailing Addr 2: Owner Phone: 7148266587 Owner Fax: Contact Information Contact Name: WESLEY MAEDO_CANX VQ96 AH Street Address 1: 2001 E 4TH Street Address 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA Zip: 927050000 Phone: 7148266587 7 1 of 1 SE 0.021 145.231 HY5 LLC 104.60 1 2001 E. 4TH RCRA STREET SANTA ANA NON GEN CA 92705 erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1189 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) EPA Handler ID: CAC003129996 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: CAROLINA MORIN Contact Address: 631 S. BROOKHURST STREET, SUITE 21313, ANAHEIM, CA, 92804, Contact Phone No and Ext.- 657-202-5907 Contact Email: CAROLINA@IMEDICALHOLDINGS.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20210719 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20210719 Handler Name: HY5 LLC Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 631 S. BROOKHURST STREET Name: YASSER SALEM Street 2: SUITE 214 Date Became Current: City: ANAHEIM Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 657-202-5907 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92804 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 631 S. BROOKHURST STREET Name: CAROLINA MORIN Street 2: SUITE 213E Date Became Current: City: ANAHEIM Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 657-202-5907 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92804 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1190 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) 8 1 of 2 Cert ID: Operation: Rural: Organization: Aluminium: Glass: Plastic: Bimetal: Agency: Grand Fath: Cert Status: Operatione: Monday Hou: Tuesday Ho: 8 2of2 Rural: Org/Age: Mailing City: Mailing Zip: Website: Cert ID: Regulator ID: Operation : Bimetal: Monday Hours: Wednesday Hours: Friday Hours: Sunday Hours: Operation End Date: Organization: Hours of Operation: SE 0.031 142.411 DUBITEC AMERICA INC 132.15 -2 2000 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 PR166940.001 Wednesday: 01/01/13 Thursday H: N/A Friday Hou: DUBITEC AMERICA INC Saturday H: Sunday Hou: Mailing Ad: 2000 E 4TH ST STE 201 Mailing Ci: SANTA ANA Mailing St: CA N/A Mailing Zi: 92705 N/A Phone No: (714) 210-6300 Website: Email: Hours of Ope: County: ORANGE SE 0.031 142.411 DUBITEC AMERICA INC 132.15 -2 2000 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 N/A Glass: Mailing Address: 2000 E 4TH ST STE 201 SANTA ANA Mailing State: CA 92705 Phone No: (714) 210-6300 Email: PR166940.001 Grand Fath: Aluminium: 1 /1 /2013 Plastic: Agency: Tuesday Hours: Thursday Hours: Saturday Hours: Certification Status: Application ID: DUBITEC AMERICA INC Mon - Fri Unknown; Sat - Sun Closed 9 1 of 1 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext.- Contact Email: Contact Country: County Name: EPA Region: Land Type: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: WNW 0.041 145.231 ENVIROTECH 226.96 1 1801 E PARKCOURT PL UNIT 120 SANTA ANA CA 92701-5002 CAD983615998 No Report VINCENT SCHEERER 1801 E PARKCOURT PL UNIT 120 , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701-5002 , US 714-569-0909 US ORANGE 09 Private 19940510 33.749855 -117.841892 DB RECYCLING PROCESSORS RCRA NON GEN VIOLATION or UNDETERMINED: There are VIOLATION or UNDETERMINED details or records associated with this facility (EPA ID) in the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement table dated Aug, 2021. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1191 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: F - 263 Violation Short Description: Transporters - General Violation Type: 263.A Violation Determined Date: 19980612 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19980712 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19980709 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19980612 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Evaluation Details Evaluation Start Date: 19980612 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: Transporters - General Return to Compliance Date: 19980709 Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19950822 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: Evaluation Agency: State Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: Yes Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner: No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19940510 Handler Name: ENVIROTECH Source Type: Notification Federal Waste Generator Code: N erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1192 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Records (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Private Street 1: 1801 E PARKCOURT PL UNIT 120 Name: DALE BEAN AND ASSOCIATES Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-569-0909 Country: Source Type: Notification Zip Code: 92701-5002 10 1 of 3 ENE 0.061 147.471 AMERICAN RED CROSS 337.62 3 LUST 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 Global ID: T0605900666 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.750151 Status Date: 4/1/1999 Longitude: -117.837102 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083000845T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: How Discovered: Tank Tightness Test Begin Date: 10/16/1986 Stop Method: Lead Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Stop Description: Local Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Case Worker. CC CUF Case: NO File Location: Potential Media of Concern: Soil How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GIN Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 71-75% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 4/1 /1999 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: Other Date: 1 /22/1987 Action: Leak Reported Action Type: Other Date: 10/16/1986 Action: Leak Discovery LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 Contact Name: VALERIEJAHN-BULL Email: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.gov City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: 9517824903 Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1439 S. BROADWAY Contact Name: CHRISTOPHERCIRAULO Email: cciraulo@santa-ana.org City: SANTA ANA Phone No: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1193 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Organization Name: SANTA ANA, CITY OF LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 4/1/1999 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 5/10/1988 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 10/16/1986 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Reaulatory Profile DB Site Facility Name: AMERICAN RED CROSS Potential CDC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR WDR Place Type: City: SANTA ANA WDR File: Zip: 92705 WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: CUF Claim: CUF Amount Paid: File Location: Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0605900666 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 4/1/1999 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report_include?global_id=T0605900666&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: SOIL User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GW Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA ANA, CITY OF (LEAD) CASEWORKER: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) - CASE #: 083000845T CASEWORKER: VALERIE JAHN-BULL Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date: 4/1 /1999 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date : 5/10/1988 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date: 10/16/1986 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 4/1/1999 Received Issue Date: 4/1/1999 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1194 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605900666&enforcement_id=5902587&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 1/22/1987 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 10/16/1986 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Discovery Doc Link: Title Description Comments: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of May 29, 2021) Document Type: Site Documents Size Document Date: 4/1/1999 Submitted By: (REGULATOR), SANGAVI PARI (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: UNKNOWN Title Link: https:Hgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605900666&enforcement_id=5902587 10 2 of 3 ENE 1990 Criteria Data Facility ID: 76666 Facility SIC Code: 5063 CO: 30 Air Basin: SC District: SC COID: ORA DISN: SOUTH COAST AQMD CHAPIS: 1990 Toxic Data Facility ID: 76666 Facility SIC Code: 5063 CO: 30 Air Basin: SC District: SC TS: Health Risk Asmt: Non -Cancer Chronic Haz Ind: Non -Cancer Acute Haz Ind: 0.061 147.471 ONAN-CUMMINS POWER 337.62 3 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR. SANTA ANA CA CERR Code: TOGT. ROGT. COT: 0 NOXT. 0 SOXT: PMT. PM10T: COID: ORA DISN: SOUTH COAST AQMD CHAPIS: CERR Code: 10 3 of 3 ENE 0.061 147.471 AMERICAN RED CROSS -ORANGE 337.62 3 CNTY 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR SANTA ANA CA erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1195 DB EMISSIONS UST SWEEPS Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB C C: A30-020-327 D Filename: SITE03A BOE: 44-032943 Page No: 60 Comp: 327 County: ORANGE Status: ACTIVE State : CA No of Tanks: 1 Zip: 92705 Jurisdict: CITY OF SANTA ANA Latitude: 33.75 Agency. FIRE DEPARTMENT Longitude: -117.838283 Phone: Georesult: S5HPNTSCZA Tank Details Tank ID: 000001 S Contain: O Tank ID: Stg: P SWRCB No: 30-020-000327-000001 Storage : Removed: Storag Type: PRODUCT Installed: P Contain: A Date: 05-29-92 Content: REG UNLEADED Capac: 7500 ONA: RANJAN KUMAR Tank Use: M.V. FUEL D File Name: TANK3A 11 1 of SW 0.07/ 386.09 Site ID: 378206 Latitude: 33.747631 Longitude: -117.841652 County: Regulated Programs El ID: 10705387 Affiliations Affil Type Desc: CUPA District Entity Name: Orange County Env Health Entity Title: Address: 1241 East Dyer RoadSuite 120 City: Santa Ana State: CA Country: Zip Code: 92705-5611 Phone: (714) 433-6406 Affil Type Desc: Parent Corporation Entity Name: BOYD Santa Ana LLC Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: Identification Signer Entity Name: Samantha Shaughnessy Entity Title: Development Manager Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: 141.01 / 1750 Acquisitions Partners -3 1750 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 El Description: Chemical Storage Facilities erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 —1196 CERS HAZ Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Affil Type Desc: Entity Name: Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: Entity Name: Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: Entity Name: Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: Entity Name: Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: Entity Name: Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Coordinates Env Int Type Code: Program ID: Latitude: Legal Owner 1750 Acquisitions Partners LLC 1750 East 4th Street Santa Ana CA United States 92705 (949) 313-2200 Facility Mailing Address Mailing Address 4000 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 110 Newport Beach CA 92660 Document Preparer Patrick Luu (ProActive Consulting Group) Operator 1750 Acquisitions Partners LLC (949) 313-2200 Environmental Contact Hines Interests Limited Partnership 4000 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 110 Newport Beach CA 92660 HMBP 10705387 33.747630 Longitude:-117.841650 Coord Name: Ref Point Type Desc: Center of a facility or station. 11 2 of 2 SW 0.07/ 141,011 CALTRANS DISTRICT 12 EA 12- 386.09 -3 OK0214 1750 E FOURTH STREET SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handier ID: CAL000459466 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: FARID ZOKAI Contact Address: 27405 PUERTA REAL STE 300 , , MISSION VIEJO , CA, 92691 , Contact Phone No and Ext. 949-582-2613 Contact Email: FARID.ZOKAI@DOT.CA.GOV erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB RCRA NON GEN Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1197 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20210115 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20210115 Handler Name: CALTRANS DISTRICT 12 EA 12-OK0214 Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 27405 PUERTA REAL STE 300 Name: FARID ZOKAI Street 2: Date Became Current: City: MISSION VIEJO Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 949-582-2613 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92691 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1750 E FOURTH STREET Name: CALTRANS BERRIS MD Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 657-328-6000 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 12 1 of 3 ESE 0.08 / 144.131 S & N LABS 401.11 0 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 HW ORANGE SANTA ANA CA 92705 Facility ID: FA0075665 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1198 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) 12 2 of 3 ESE 0.081 144.131 S&N LABS INC 401.11 0 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAL000432860 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: NEIL SPINGARN Contact Address: 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92705, Contact Phone No and Ext. 714-543-2211 Contact Email: CHEMIST@SNLABS.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20180102 Location Latitude: 33.748614 Location Longitude: -117.837873 DB RCRA NON GEN Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner: No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20180102 Handler Name: S&N LABS INC Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 Name: S&N LABS INC Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-543-2211 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 —1199 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Type: Other Street 1: 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 Name: NEIL SPINGARN Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-543-2211 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 12 3 of 3 ESE 0.081 144.131 401.11 0 Site ID: 575810 Latitude: 33.748640 Longitude:-117.837830 County: Regulated Programs EIID: 10872940 EIID: 10872940 Affiliations Affil Type Desc: Environmental Contact Entity Name: Neil Spingarn Entity Title: Address: 2021 E 4th St Ste 112 City: Santa Ana State: CA Country: Zip Code: 92705 Phone: Affil Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address Entity Name: Mailing Address Entity Title: Address: 2021 E Fourth St 112 City: Santa Ana State: CA Country: Zip Code: 92705 Phone: Affil Type Desc: Operator Entity Name: Neil Spingarn Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: (714) 543-2211 Affil Type Desc: Document Preparer Entity Name: Neil Spingarn Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: CUPA District Entity Name: Orange County Env Health S&N Labs, Inc. CERS HAZ 2021 E 4TH ST STE 112 SANTA ANA CA 92705 El Description: Chemical Storage Facilities El Description: Hazardous Waste Generator ® erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1200 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: Entity Name: Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: Entity Name: Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc: Entity Name: Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: 13 1 of 1 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: County Name: EPA Region: Land Type: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summa Note: Handler Summary Importer Activity: Mixed Waste Generator. Transporter Activity: 1241 East Dyer RoadSuite 120 Santa Ana CA 92705-5611 (714)433-6406 Identification Signer Neil Spingarn President Legal Owner Neil Spingarn 2021 E 4th St Ste 112 Santa Ana CA United States 92705 (714)543-2211 Parent Corporation S&N Labs, Inc. NW 0.141 147.671 JASON STRUBBE 734.33 3 722 N MANTLE SANTA ANA CA 92701 CAC003083732 No Report JASON STRUBBE 722 N MANTLE_ , SANTA ANA , CA, 92701 , 310-321-8333 KIM.JJENVIRONMENTAL@GMAIL.COM ORANGE 09 810121I11r E DB RCRA NON GEN NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). No No No erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1201 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20200914 Handler Name: JASON STRUBBE Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 722 N MANTLE Name: JASON STRUBBE Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 310-321-8333 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 722 N MANTLE Name: JASON STRUBBE Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 310-321-8333 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 14 1 of 1 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: County Name: EPA Region: Land Type: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: N 0.151 155.681 COURTNEY BELZANO 776.31 11 1905 E.FRUIT ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 CAC003122201 No Report COURTNEY BELZANO 1905 E.FRUIT ST , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , 949-910-1305 ERNIE@SIRRIS.BIZ ORANGE 09 20210601 DB RCRA NON GEN NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1202 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Handler Summary Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20210601 Handler Name: COURTNEY BELZANO Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Type: Name: Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: Source Type: Owner/Operator Ind: Type: Name: Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: Source Type: 15 1 of 1 Current Operator Street No: Other Street 1: 1905 E.FRUIT ST COURTNEY BELZANO Street 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA 949-910-1305 Country: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Current Owner Street No: Other Street 1: 1905 E.FRUIT ST COURTNEY BELZANO Street 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA 949-910-1305 Country: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: County Name: EPA Region: Land Type: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary DB N 0.151 155.591 YIHUA LEE 776.63 11 1909 E FRUIT ST RCRA SANTA ANA CA 92701 NON GEN CAC003131526 No Report YIHUA LEE 1909 E FRUIT ST, , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , 626-589-7940 MANIFEST.SIRRIS@GMAIL.COM ORANGE 09 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1203 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20210728 Handler Name: YIHUA LEE Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1909 E FRUIT ST Name: YIHUA LEE Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 626-589-7940 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1909 E FRUIT ST Name: YIHUA LEE Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 626-589-7940 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 16 1 of 2 N 0.151 155.771 HIRAM DON 783.74 12 RCRA TSD 1907 E FRUIT ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003012754 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: HIRAM DON Contact Address: 1907 E FRUIT ST, , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext. 408-710-6938 Contact Email: ADMIN@VIKINGENVIRO.COM Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Receive Date: 20190430 Location Latitude: 33.752803 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1204 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Location Longitude:-117.839709 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190430 Handler Name: HIRAM DON Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1907 E FRUIT ST Name: HIRAM DON Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 408-710-6938 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1907 E FRUIT ST Name: HIRAM DON Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 408-710-6938 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 16 2 of 2 N 0.151 155.771 HIRAM DON 783.74 12 RCRA 1907 E FRUIT ST NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003012754 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: HIRAM DON Contact Address: 1907 E FRUIT ST, , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext. 408-710-6938 Contact Email: ADMIN@VIKINGENVIRO.COM Contact Country: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1205 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20190430 Location Latitude: 33.752803 Location Longitude: -117.839709 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190430 Handler Name: HIRAM DON Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1907 E FRUIT ST Name: HIRAM DON Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 408-710-6938 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1907 E FRUIT ST Name: HIRAM DON Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 408-710-6938 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 17 1 of 1 ENE 0.151 146.161 AMERICAN RED CROSS 805.63 2 600 N PARKCENTER DR UST SWEEPS SANTA ANA CA C C: A30-020-424 D Filename: SITE03A BOE: 44-032943 Page No: 67 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1206 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Comp: 424 County: ORANGE Status: ACTIVE State : CA No of Tanks: 1 Zip: 92705 Jurisdict: CITY OF SANTA ANA Latitude: 33.75 Agency. FIRE DEPARTMENT Longitude: -117.838283 Phone: Georesult: S5H--- SCZA Tank Details Tank ID: 000001 S Contain: O Tank ID: Stg: P SWRCB No: 30-020-000424-000001 Storage : Removed: Storag Type: PRODUCT Installed: P Contain: A Date: 05-28-92 Content: DIESEL Capac: 550 ONA: RANJAN KUMAR Tank Use: M.V. FUEL D File Name: TANK3A 18 1 of 1 ENE 0.151 149.181 LAKE DIANNE APARTMENTS 806.23 5 A149 RCRA 750 PARK CENTER DR NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003102932 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: SEPTEMBER HENSEL Contact Address: 750 PARK CENTER DR_ , SANTA ANA, CA, 92705, Contact Phone No and Ext. 714-558-7170 Contact Email: JASCENCIO@RMC.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20210127 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1207 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Receive Date: 20210127 Handler Name: LAKE DIANNE APARTMENTS A149 Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 750 PARK CENTER DR Name: SEPTEMBER HENSEL Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-558-7170 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 750 PARK CENTER DR Name: LAKE DIANNE APARTMENTS Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-558-7170 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 19 1 of EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: EPA Region: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: Handler Summa ENE 0.151 146.441 LAKE DIANE APARTMENTS 806.91 2 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE UNIT A120 & A134 SANTA ANA CA 92705 CAC003008026 No Report DANIEL GUADERRAMA 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE_ , SANTA ANA, CA, 92705, 714-306-8829 DGUADARRAMA@SATELLITEMANAGEMENT.COM ORANGE 09 20190331 33.750389 -117.836346 DB I:ZdCL196401 NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner: No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No M erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1208 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190331 Handler Name: LAKE DIANE APARTMENTS Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Type: Name: Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: Source Type: Owner/Operator Ind: Type: Name: Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: Source Type: Current Owner Street No: Other Street 1: 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE LAKE DIANE APARTMENTS Street 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA 714-306-8829 Country: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 Current Operator Street No: Other Street 1: 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE DANIEL GUADERRAMA Street 2: City. SANTA ANA State: CA 714-306-8829 Country: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 19 2 of 2 ENE 0.151 146.441 LAKE DIANE APARTMENTS 806.91 2 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE UNIT A120 & A134 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003008026 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: DANIEL GUADERRAMA Contact Address: 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE_ , SANTA ANA, CA, 92705, Contact Phone No and Ext. 714-306-8829 Contact Email: DGUADARRAMA@SATELLITEMANAGEMENT.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20190331 Location Latitude: 33.750389 Location Longitude: -117.836346 DB RCRA NON GEN Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1209 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190331 Handler Name: LAKE DIANE APARTMENTS Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE Name: DANIEL GUADERRAMA Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-306-8829 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 650 PARKCENTER DRIVE Name: LAKE DIANE APARTMENTS Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-306-8829 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 20 1 of 1 SSW 0.151 137.571 XEROX CENTRE PARTNERS 817.25 -7 RCRA SQG 1851 E FIRST ST STE 855 SANTA ANA CA 92705-3949 EPA Handler ID: CA0000381905 Gen Status Universe: Small Quantity Generator Contact Name: D MICHAEL WHITE Contact Address: 1851 E FIRST ST STE 855 , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92705-3949 , US Contact Phone No and Ext.- 714-568-1014 Contact Email: Contact Country: US County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Private Receive Date: 19940629 Location Latitude: 33.745698 Location Longitude: -117.84069 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1210 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19940629 Handler Name: XEROX CENTRE PARTNERS Federal Waste Generator Code: 2 Generator Code Description: Small Quantity Generator Source Type: Notification DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Private Street 1: 800 LONG RIDGE RD Name: XEROX CENTRE PARTNERS Street 2: Date Became Current: City: STAMFORD Date Ended Current: State: CT Phone: 203-968-4130 Country: Source Type: Notification Zip Code: 06904 21 1 of 1 NW 0.16/ 148.901 MARCELINO SALGADO 843.04 5 RCRA 806 N MANTLE LANE NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003110235 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: MARCELINO SALGADO Contact Address: 806 N MANTLE LANE_ , SANTA ANA , CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext.- 714-542-8177 Contact Email: MERCELIN0482@HOTMAIL.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20210316 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1211 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner: No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20210316 Handler Name: MARCELINO SALGADO Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 806 N MANTLE LANE Name: MARCELINO SALGADO Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-542-8177 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 806 N MANTLE LANE Name: MARCELINO SALGADO Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-542-8177 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 22 1 of 7 SSE 0.161 857.20 EPA ID: CAL000016151 Create Date: 11/14/1989 Facility Act Ind: No Inact Date: 3/26/2004 Reason: Cleaners Region Code: 4 DD Latitude: 33.745696 DD Longitude: -117.839025 Facility County Code: 30 Mail Name: Owner Name: MOHAMED FEROZE THALIFFDEEN Owner Street 1: 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al Owner Street 2: DB 137.041 SNOWHITE CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS -7 2031 E 1ST ST STE Al SANTA ANA CA 927054040 Owner City: SANTA ANA Owner State: CA Owner Zip: 927054040 Owner Phone: 0 Owner Fax: Contact Name: MOHAMED FEROZE THALIFFDEEN Contact Street 1: 2031 E 1 st St Ste Al Contact Street 2: Contact City: SANTA ANA Contact State: CA Contact Zip: 927054040 Contact Phone: 7148367575 Contact Fax: 22 2 of 7 SSE 0.161 137.041 NEW CLEANERS 857.20 -7 2031 E 1ST ST STE Al SANTA ANA CA 927054040 EPA ID: CAL000342036 Owner City: SANTA ANA Create Date: 4/9/2009 2:29:32 PM Owner State: CA Facility Act Ind: Yes Owner Zip: 927054040 Inact Date: Owner Phone: 7145589177 Reason: SIC/NAICS Owner Fax: 0 Region Code: 4 Contact Name: SONG IL CHANG DD Latitude: 33.745723 Contact Street 1: 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DRYCLEANERS Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1212 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) DD Longitude:-117.838024 Facility County Code: 30 Mail Name: Owner Name: SONG IL CHANG Owner Street 1: 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al Owner Street 2: NAICS Details Contact Street 2: Contact City: SANTA ANA Contact State: CA Contact Zip: 92705 Contact Phone: 7145589177 Contact Fax: NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) SIC Code: 7211 SIC Description: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial 22 3 of 7 SSE 0.161 857.20 EPA ID: CAL000147317 Create Date: 6/2/1998 Facility Act Ind: No Inact Date: 6/30/1999 Reason: Cleaners Region Code: 4 DD Latitude: 33.745696 DD Longitude: -117.839025 Facility County Code: 30 Mail Name: Owner Name: MOHAMMED THALIFFDEEN Owner Street 1: 2031 1 ST ST #A1 Owner Street 2: 22 4 of 7 SSE 0.161 857.20 EPA ID: CAL000269149 Create Date: 4/16/2003 10:06:52 AM Facility Act Ind: No Inact Date: 6/30/2007 Reason: SIC/NAICS Region Code: 4 DD Latitude: 33.745623 DD Longitude: -117.838023 Facility County Code: 30 Mail Name: Owner Name: SNOW WHITE DRY CLEANERS INC Owner Street 1: 2031 E FIRST ST STE Al Owner Street 2: NAICS Details 137.041 SNOW WHITE CLEANERS -7 2031 1ST DRYCLEANERS ST #Al SANTA ANA CA 927050000 Owner City: SANTA ANA Owner State: CA Owner Zip: 927050000 Owner Phone: 0 Owner Fax: Contact Name: MOHAMMED THALIFFDEEN/OWNER Contact Street 1: INACT 99VQ FINAL NOTICE - BATCH Contact Street 2: 4/11 /2000 Contact City: SANTA ANA Contact State: CA Contact Zip: 927050000 Contact Phone: 7148367575 Contact Fax: NULL 137.041 SNOW WHITE DRY CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS -7 INC 2031 E FIRST ST STE Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 Owner City: SANTA ANA Owner State: CA Owner Zip: 92705 Owner Phone: 7145589177 Owner Fax: Contact Name: DONGYUN PARK Contact Street 1: 7 LEATHERWOOD WAY Contact Street 2: Contact City. IRVINE Contact State: CA Contact Zip: 92612 Contact Phone: 9494225926 Contact Fax: 9497861692 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) SIC Code: 7211 SIC Description: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial 22 5 of 7 SSE 0.161 137.041 NEW CLEANERS 857.20 -7 2031 E 1ST ST #A1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA ID: CAL000310998 Owner City: SANTA ANA Create Date: 8/28/2006 3:01:46 PM Owner State: CA erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1213 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Facility Act Ind: No Owner Zip: 927050000 Inact Date: 6/30/2008 Owner Phone: 7145589177 Reason: SIC/NAICS Owner Fax: Region Code: 4 Contact Name: ZHE BLI DD Latitude: 33.745723 Contact Street 1: 2031 E 1 ST ST #A1 DD Longitude: -117.838024 Contact Street 2: Facility County Code: 30 Contact City. SANTA ANA Mail Name: Contact State: CA Owner Name: KIL & BLI CO. INC Contact Zip: 950542131 Owner Street 1: 2031 E 1 ST ST #A1 Contact Phone: 7145589177 Owner Street 2: Contact Fax: NAICS Details NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) SIC Code: 7211 SIC Description: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial 22 6 of 7 SSE 0.161 137.041 NEW CLEANERS 857.20 RCRA -7 2031 E 1ST ST STE Al SANTA ANA NON GEN CA 92705-4040 EPA Handler ID: CAL000342036 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: SONG IL CHANG Contact Address: 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92705, Contact Phone No and Ext. 714-558-9177 Contact Email: SONGILCHANG@YAHOO.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20090409 Location Latitude: 33.746427 Location Longitude: -117.837954 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1214 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Receive Date: 20090409 Handler Name: NEW CLEANERS Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al Name: SONG IL CHANG Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-558-9177 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 2031 E 1 ST ST STE Al Name: SONG IL CHANG Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-558-9177 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705-4040 22 7 of 7 SSE 0.161 137.041 NEW CLEANERS 857.20 -7 2031 E 1ST ST STE Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 FRS Facility ID: 110070472865 NPDES IDs: NAICS Codes: 81232 SIC Codes: Latitude: 33.765441 Longitude:-117.812426 23 1 of 2 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext.- Contact Email: Contact Country: County Name: EPA Region: Land Type: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: SSE 0.191 136.121 FREEWAY AUTO BODY 1,004.50 -8 2000 E FIRST ST SANTA ANA CA 92704 CAD981158967 Small Quantity Generator us us ORANGE 09 19960901 33.742728 -117.838395 FED DRYCLEANERS RCRA SQG NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summary Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No ® erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1215 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19851018 Handler Name: FREEWAY AUTO BODY Federal Waste Generator Code: 1 Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator Source Type: Notification Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19960901 Handler Name: FREEWAY AUTO BODY Federal Waste Generator Code: 2 Generator Code Description: Small Quantity Generator Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details DB Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Private Street 1: NOT REQUIRED Name: PAUL ROMAIN Street 2: Date Became Current: City: NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current: State: ME Phone: 415-555-1212 Country: Source Type: Notification Zip Code: 99999 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Private Street 1: NOT REQUIRED Name: NOT REQUIRED Street 2: Date Became Current: City: NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current: State: ME Phone: 415-555-1212 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 99999 Historical Handler Details Receive Dt: 19851018 Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator Handler Name: FREEWAY AUTO BODY 23 2 of 2 SSE 0.191 136.121 SANTA ANA CHR PLY & ISUZU 1,004.50 -8 RCRA SQG 2000 E FIRST ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAD981692155 Gen Status Universe: Small Quantity Generator Contact Name: Contact Address: US erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1216 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: US County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 19960901 Location Latitude: 33.745698 Location Longitude: -117.84069 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19960901 Handler Name: SANTA ANA CHR PLY & ISUZU Federal Waste Generator Code: 2 Generator Code Description: Small Quantity Generator Source Type: Implementer DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Private Street 1: NOT REQUIRED Name: NOT REQUIRED Street 2: Date Became Current: City. NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current: State: ME Phone: 415-555-1212 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 99999 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Private Street 1: NOT REQUIRED Name: O R HAAN INC (JIM WOOD SR) Street 2: Date Became Current: City: NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current: State: ME Phone: 415-555-1212 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 99999 24 1 of 1 NNE 0.201 156.951 ARDITH CHAFFEE RCRA 1,070.55 13 913 DAYNA ST NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1217 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) EPA Handler ID: CAC003086841 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: ARDITH CHAFFEE Contact Address: 913 DAYNA ST , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext: 714-878-6510 Contact Email: JANICE@ABSOLUTEABATEMENTINC.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20201005 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20201005 Handler Name: ARDITH CHAFFEE Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 913 DAYNA ST Name: ARDITH CHAFFEE Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-878-6510 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 913 DAYNA ST Name: ARDITH CHAFFEE Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-878-6510 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1218 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) 25 1 of 4 WSW 0.211 138.981 SANTA ANA FIRE STATION NO. 2 LUST 1,109.69 -5 1688 EAST 4TH STREET SANTA ANA CA Global ID: T0605981039 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.748063 Status Date: 11/26/2002 Longitude:-117.844016 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083003968T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: How Discovered. UST System Modification Begin Date: 4/20/1999 Stop Method: Other Means Lead Agency: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Stop Description: AGAIN, WE NEEDED TO TEST FOR MTBE. Local Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Case Worker. CUF Case: NO File Location: Regional Board Potential Media of Concern: How Discovered Description: NO MTBE SAMPLING OCCURRED DURING TANK REMOVAL ACTIVITIES AS REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 521 (MOUNTJOY), WHICH REQUIRES MTBE SAMPLING PRIOR TO APPROVAL SITE CLOSURE. Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 71-75% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: REMEDIATION Date : 11/26/2002 Action: Action Type: Date : Action: ENFORCEMENT 11/26/2002 Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 11 /14/2002 Action: Preliminary Site Assessment Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 3/7/2002 Action: Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 2/2/2002 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 1/17/2002 Action: Warning Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 9/28/1999 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 9/20/1999 Action: " Historical Enforcement Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 9/20/1999 Action: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1219 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: Other Date: 4/20/1999 Action: Leak Reported Action Type: Other Date: 4/20/1999 Action: Leak Discovery Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 4/20/1999 Action: * Historical Enforcement LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: CHRISTOPHERCIRAULO City: SANTA ANA Organization Name: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Address: 1439 S. BROADWAY Email: cciraulo@santa-ana.org Phone No: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 11/26/2002 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 11/14/2002 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 1/24/2002 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 4/20/1999 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Reaulatory Profile DB Site Facility Name: SANTA ANA FIRE STATION NO. 2 Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: 1688 EAST 4TH STREET WDR Place Type: City: SANTA ANA WDR File: Zip: WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: CUF Claim: CUF Amount Paid: File Location: REGIONAL BOARD Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0605981039 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 11/26/2002 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report_include?global_id=T0605981039&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GW Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) (LEAD) - CASE #: 083003968T SANTA ANA, CITY OF CASEWORKER: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1220 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date: 11/26/2002 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 11 /14/2002 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date : 1/24/2002 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date: 4/20/1999 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Action Report (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: UNKNOWN Begin Date: 11/26/2002 Phase: End Date: 11/26/2002 Contaminant Mass Removed: Description: NO ACTION REQUIRED SINCE NO CONTAMINATION WAS DETECTED LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 11/26/2002 Received Issue Date: 11/26/2002 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Doc Link: https:Hgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605981039&enforcement_id=5875899&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: NO CONTAMINATION (INCLUDING MTBE) NOTED Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: '11/14/2002 Received Issue Date: 11/14/2002 Action: Preliminary Site Assessment Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Preliminary Site Assessment Report - NO CONTAMINATION, INCLUDING MTBE, DETECTED Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans Action Date: '3/7/2002 Received Issue Date: 1/25/2002 Action: Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan - PROBELMS IN GETTING FUNDS RELEASES BY CITY COUNCIL FOR CONTRACT Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 2/2/2002 Received Issue Date: 2/2/2002 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: Title Description Comments: APPROVED THE 1/24/02 WORK PLAN FOR SOIL BORINGS AND SAMPLES erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1221 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: Enforcement/Orders Action Date: 1/17/2002 Received Issue Date: 1/17/2002 Action: Warning Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605981039&enforcement_id=5875897&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: WORK PLAN LATE AND APPROVED EXTENSION DUE TO CITY COUNCIL DELAYS Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: UST Sampling Report Other Regulatory Actions 9/28/1999 9/28/1999 Staff Letter https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605981039&enforcement_id=5875895&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Enforcement/Orders 9/20/1999 9/20/1999 . Historical Enforcement Response Requested - Reports 9/20/1999 9/20/1999 Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report Action Type: Enforcement/Orders Action Date: 4/20/1999 Received Issue Date: 4/20/1999 Action: ' Historical Enforcement Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REFERRED THE CASE TO REGIONAL BOARD FOR INVESTIGATION OVERSIGHT Action Type: Cleanup Action Action Date: 11/26/2002 Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: NO ACTION REQUIRED SINCE NO CONTAMINATION WAS DETECTED Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 4/20/1999 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Discovery Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 4/20/1999 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1222 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of Mav 29. 2021 DB Document Type: Site Documents Size : 42 KB Document Date: 5/12/2008 Submitted By: (REGULATOR) Type: LETTER Submitted: Title: CASE CLOSURE Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/site_documents/5281986832/Fire%2OStation%20number%202%5Fl688% 20E%2E4th%20Street%5FSanta%20Ana%5FNOM%5FCase%20Closure%2Epdf Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 11/26/2002 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: NO CONTAMINATION (INCLUDING MTBE) NOTED. Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605981039&enforcement_id=5875899 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 1/17/2002 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: WARNING LETTER Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN LATE AND APPROVED EXTENSION DUE TO CITY COUNCIL DELAYS. Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605981039&enforcement_id=5875897 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 9/28/1999 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605981039&enforcement_id=5875895 25 2 of 4 WSW 0.211 138.981 FIRE STATION 2 HHSS 1,109.69 -5 1688 E. FOURTH SANTA ANA CA 92701 County: Orange Tank Details Microfiche: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002e7ca.pdf 25 3 of 4 WSW 0.211 138.981 FIRE STATION #2 HIST TANK 1,109.69 -5 1688 E. FOURTH SANTA ANA CA Owner Name: CITY OF SANTA ANA No of Containers: 1 Owner Street: 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA County: ORANGE Owner City: SANTA ANA Facility State: CA Owner State: CA Facility Zip: 92701 Owner Zip: 92701 25 4 of 4 WSW 0.211 138.981 FIRE STATION #2 UST SWEEPS 1,109.69 -5 1688 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA C C: A30-020-313 D Filename: SITE03A BOE: Page No: 52 Comp: 313 County: ORANGE Status: ACTIVE State : CA No of Tanks: 1 Zip: 92701 Jurisdict: CITY OF SANTA ANA Latitude: 33.748035 Agency. FIRE DEPARTMENT Longitude:-117.844812 Phone: Georesult: S5HPNTSCZA erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1223 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Tank Details Tank ID: 000001 S Contain: O Tank ID: E 62672 Stg: P SWRCB No: 30-020-000313-000001 Storage : Removed: Storag Type: PRODUCT Installed: P Contain: A Date: 07-01-85 Content: DIESEL Capac: 1000 ONA: DOLLY GROVER Tank Use: M.V. FUEL D File Name: TANK3A 26 1 of 2 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: County Name: EPA Region: Land Type: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: Handler Summa ESE 0.221 145.951 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL- ST. 1,138.71 2 JOSEPH 2212 E 4TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 CAC003069289 No Report VALERIE AGUILAR 2212 E 4TH ST_ , SANTA ANA , CA, 92705, 626-813-0234 KYLE.CURRAN@SAFETY-KLEEN.COM ORANGE 09 20200603 RCRA NON GEN NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20200603 Handler Name: CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL- ST. JOSEPH Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1224 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 2212 E 4TH ST Name: VALERIE AGUILAR Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 626-813-0234 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 2212 E 4TH ST Name: CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 626-813-0234 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 DB 26 2 of 2 ESE 0.221 145.951 ST. JOSEPH HERITAGE MEDICAL RCRA 1,138.71 2 GROUP 2212 E 4TH ST NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003064975 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: JACKIE PAIZ Contact Address: 1135 S. SUNSET AVENUE , 307, WEST COVINA, CA, 91790, Contact Phone No and Ext. 626-813-0234 Contact Email: VAGUILAR@CALCOMM.ORG Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20200430 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summar Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20200430 Handler Name: ST. JOSEPH HERITAGE MEDICAL GROUP Source Type: Implementer erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1225 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1800 QUAIL STREET Name: SANTA ANA MOB, LLC Street 2: 100 Date Became Current: City: NEWPORT BEACH Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 626-813-0234 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92660 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1135 S. SUNSET AVENUE Name: JACKIE PAIZ Street 2: 307 Date Became Current: City: WEST COVINA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 626-813-0234 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 91790 27 1 of 3 SSW 0.221 134.911 92631 1,140.04 -9 1814 E FIRST ST HHSS SANTA ANA CA 92705 County: Orange Tank Details Microfiche: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002e6f7.pdf 27 2 of 3 SSW 0.221 134.911 92631 1,140.04 -9 1814 E FIRST ST HIST TANK SANTA ANA CA Owner Name: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. No of Containers: 5 Owner Street. 575 MARKET County: ORANGE Owner City: SAN FRANCISCO Facility State: CA Owner State: CA Facility Zip: 92705 Owner Zip: 94105 27 3 of 3 SSW 0.221 134.911 92631 1,140.04 -9 1814 E 1ST ST UST SWEEPS SANTA ANA CA C C: I30-020-62295 D Filename: NSITE6 BOE: Page No: 396 Comp: 62295 County: ORANGE Status: INACTIVE State : CA No of Tanks: 5 Zip: 92705 Jurisdict: CITY OF SANTA ANA Latitude: 33.745503 Agency: FIRE DEPARTMENT Longitude: -117.841471 Phone: (714) 835-4419 Georesult: S5HPNTSCZA Tank Details Tank ID: 000002 S Contain: NONE O Tank ID: Stg: SWRCB No: 30-020-062295-000002 Storage : PRODUCT Removed: 07-15-93 Storag Type: PRODUCT Installed: 01-01-63 P Contain: BARE STEEL A Date: Content: Capac: 3000 ONA: Tank Use: UNKNOWN D File Name: NTANK6 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1226 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Tank Details Tank ID: 000004 S Contain: NONE O Tank ID: Stg: SWRCB No: 30-020-062295-000004 Storage : PRODUCT Removed: 07-15-93 Storag Type: PRODUCT Installed: 01-01-63 P Contain: BARE STEEL A Date: Content: Capac: 6000 ONA: Tank Use: UNKNOWN D File Name: NTANK6 Tank Details Tank ID: 000005 S Contain: NONE O Tank ID: Stg: SWRCB No: 30-020-062295-000005 Storage : WASTE Removed: 07-15-93 Storag Type: WASTE Installed: 01-01-63 P Contain: BARE STEEL A Date: Content: Capac: 550 ONA: Tank Use: UNKNOWN D File Name: NTANK6 Tank Details Tank ID: 000001 S Contain: NONE O Tank ID: Stg: SWRCB No: 30-020-062295-000001 Storage : PRODUCT Removed: 07-15-93 Storag Type: PRODUCT Installed: 01-01-63 P Contain: BARE STEEL A Date: Content: Capac: 7500 ONA: Tank Use: UNKNOWN D File Name: NTANK6 Tank Details Tank ID: 000003 S Contain: NONE O Tank ID: Stg: SWRCB No: 30-020-062295-000003 Storage : PRODUCT Removed: 07-15-93 Storag Type: PRODUCT Installed: 01-01-63 P Contain: BARE STEEL A Date: Content: Capac: 6000 ONA: Tank Use: UNKNOWN D File Name: NTANK6 28 1 of 1 WNW 0.22/ 150.341 MOUSA SAADALLA 1,169.26 RCRA 6 802 MABURY ST SANTA ANA NON GEN CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003072486 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: MOUSA SAADALLA Contact Address: 802 MABURY ST , , SANTA ANA , CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext.- 714-973-2341 Contact Email: GENEVADEGUIRE@ALLIANCE-ENVIRO.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20200626 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1227 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20200626 Handler Name: MOUSA SAADALLA Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Type: Other Name: MOUSA SAADALLA Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: 714-973-2341 Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Type: Other Name: MOUSA SAADALLA Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: 714-973-2341 Source Type: Implementer 29 1 of 1 NNE 0.231 1,193.60 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: County Name: EPA Region: Land Type: Street No: Street 1: 802 MABURY ST Street 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA Country: Zip Code: 92701 Street No: Street 1: 802 MABURY ST Street 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA Country: Zip Code: 92701 157.441 LORA & JOHN ALVARADO 13 925 DAYNA ST SANTA ANA CA 92701-4421 CAC003033318 No Report LORA & JOHN ALVARADO 925 DAYNA ST , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701-4421 , 909-287-5786 NANCYRUIZ@ALLIANCE-ENVIRO.COM ORANGE 09 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB RCRA NON GEN Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1228 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: Handler Summa 20190911 NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190911 Handler Name: LORA & JOHN ALVARADO Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 925 DAYNA ST Name: LORA & JOHN ALVARADO Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 909-287-5786 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701-4421 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 925 DAYNA ST Name: LORA & JOHN ALVARADO Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 909-287-5786 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701-4421 30 1 of 2 SW 0.231 134.931 COMPAK FOODS 1,205.36 -9 SANTA ANA CA Estor/EPA ID: 80000999 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead. APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074406 Project Manager: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB ENVIROSTOR Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1229 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Site Type: FUDS County: ORANGE Address Description: Latitude: 33.7458333333333 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude: -117.843055555556 Special Program: Acres: 5 ACRES Funding: DERA Supervisor: PATRICK HSIEH Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 8/14/2018 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History. Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Program Type: MILITARY EVALUATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=80000999 Completed Activities Title: FUDS Screening Project Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Screening Date Completed: 9/26/2017 Comments: Draft Site Visit Report on R drive for management review, comments and or concurrence. Title: USACE INPR Summary JOCA735800 26 May 1999 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80000999&doc_id=5011312 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Inventory Project Report (INPR) Date Completed: 5/26/1999 Comments: DB 30 2 of 2 SIN 0.231 134.931 COMPAK FOODS 1,205.36 -9 FUDS SANTA ANA CA FUDS Property No: J09CA7358 EMS Map Link: https://fudsportal.usace.army.mil/ems/ems/inventory/map/map?id=63094 FUDS INST ID: CA99799FA38600 Status: Properties without projects SDS ID: NPL Status Code: Not on the NPL Eligibility: Ineligible Site Eligib: Current Owner. Has Project. No DOD FUDS Pro: Project Required: No No Further Action: Congressional District: 46 EPA Region: 09 County: ORANGE Latitude: 33.74583333 Longitude: -117.84305556 Fiscal year. 2019 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1230 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) USACE Division: USACE District: Shape Area: Shape Len: Centroid Latitude: Centroid Longitude: Media ID: Metadata ID: Feature Desc: Property History: SPD Los Angeles District (SPL) N/A DB 31 1 of 3 SIN 0.231 134.401 SANTA ANA HHSS 1,239.16 -10 301 N MABURY ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 County: Orange Tank Details Microfiche: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002e680.pdf 31 2of3 Owner Name: Owner Street: Owner City: Owner State: Owner Zip: 31 3 of 3 C C: BOE: Comp: Status: No of Tanks: Jurisdict: Agency: Phone: Tank Details Tank ID: O Tank ID: SWRCB No: Removed: Installed: A Date: Capac: Tank Use: Tank Details Tank ID: O Tank ID: SWRCB No: Removed: Installed: A Date: Capac: SW 0.231 134.401 SANTA ANA 1,239.16 -10 301 NMABURY ST SANTA ANA CA CALIF DEPT OF TRANSPORTAION No of Containers: 2 1120 N STREET County: ORANGE SACRAMENTO Facility State: CA CA Facility Zip: 92701 95814 SW A30-020-68105 68105 ACTIVE 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA FIRE DEPARTMENT 000002 2 30-020-068105-000002 07-01-85 2000 M.V. FUEL 000001 1 30-020-068105-000001 07-01-85 1000 0.231 134.401 SANTA ANA 1,239.16 -10 301 N MABURY ST SANTA ANA CA D Filename: SITE03A Page No: 63 County: ORANGE State : CA Zip: 92701 Latitude: 0 Longitude: 0 Georesult: N S Contain: Stg: Storage Storag Type: P Contain: Content: ONA: D File Name: S Contain: Stg: Storage Storag Type: P Contain: Content: ONA: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1231 P PRODUCT LEADED RANJAN KUMAR TANK3A P PRODUCT DIESEL RANJAN KUMAR HIST TANK Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Tank Use: M.V. FUEL D File Name: TANK3A 32 1 of 1 WSW 0.231 138.901 SANTA ANA FIRE DEPT STATION 1,240.16 RCRA SQG -5 #2 1668 E FOURTH STREET SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAD981572928 Gen Status Universe: Small Quantity Generator Contact Name: Contact Address: US Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: US County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 19960901 Location Latitude: 33.748014 Location Longitude: -117.844479 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO VIOLATIONS: All of the compliance records associated with this facility (EPA ID) indicate NO VIOLATIONS; Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement table dated Aug, 2021. Evaluation Details Evaluation Start Date: 19921221 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: Evaluation Agency: State Contractor/Grantee Handler Summary Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner: No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19860926 Handler Name: SANTA ANA FIRE DEPT STATION #2 Federal Waste Generator Code: 1 Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator Source Type: Notification Hazardous Waste Handler Details erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1232 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19940329 Handler Name: CITY OF SANTA ANA CORPORATE YARD Federal Waste Generator Code: 1 Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator Source Type: Annual/Biennial Report Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19960901 Handler Name: SANTA ANA FIRE DEPT STATION #2 Federal Waste Generator Code: 2 Generator Code Description: Small Quantity Generator Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details DB Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Municipal Street 1: NOT REQUIRED Name: SANTA ANA CITY OF Street 2: Date Became Current: City: NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current: State: ME Phone: 415-555-1212 Country: Source Type: Notification Zip Code: 99999 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Municipal Street 1: NOT REQUIRED Name: NOT REQUIRED Street 2: Date Became Current: City: NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current: State: ME Phone: 415-555-1212 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 99999 Historical Handler Details Receive Dt: 19940329 Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator Handler Name: CITY OF SANTA ANA CORPORATE YARD Receive Dt. 19860926 Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator Handler Name: SANTA ANA FIRE DEPT STATION #2 33 1 of 1 NE 0.241 156.321 JANELLE SANDERS RCRA 1,242.44 12 919 DIANNE STREET NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003113672 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: JANELLE SANDERS Contact Address: 919 DIANNE STREET_ , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext.- 714-271-1360 Contact Email: ERNIE@SIRRIS.BIZ Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20210407 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1233 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20210407 Handler Name: JANELLE SANDERS Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Type: Other Name: JANELLE SANDERS Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: 714-271-1360 Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Type: Other Name: JANELLE SANDERS Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: 714-271-1360 Source Type: Implementer 34 1 of 1 NNW 0.241 1,284.02 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: County Name: EPA Region: Land Type: Street No: Street 1: 919 DIANNE STREET Street 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA Country: Zip Code: 92701 Street No: Street 1: 919 DIANNE STREET Street 2: City: SANTA ANA State: CA Country: Zip Code: 92701 154.721 DIXIE HESSON 11 1131 CABRILLO PARK DR SANTA ANA CA 92701 CAC003087731 No Report DIXIE HESSON 1131 CABRILLO PARK DR_ , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , 949-300-3050 ADMIN@VIKINGENVIRO.COM ORANGE 09 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB RCRA NON GEN Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1234 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: Handler Summa 20201009 DB NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20201009 Handler Name: DIXIE HESSON Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: Name: DIZIE HESSON Street 2: Date Became Current: City: Date Ended Current: State: Phone: 949-300-3050 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: Name: DIXIE HESSON Street 2: Date Became Current: City: Date Ended Current: State: Phone: 949-300-3050 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 35 1 of 1 NNW 0.251 154.701 1,301.02 11 1131 CABRILLO PARK DR SANTA ANA CA 92701 1131 CABRILLO PARK DR SANTA ANA CA 92701 HENRY RUCKER RCRA 1062 CABRILLO PARK B-UNIT A NON GEN SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handier ID: CAC003126710 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: HENRY RUCKER Contact Address: 1062 CABRILLO PARK B-U NIT A, , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext: 714-362-5335 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1235 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Contact Email: SCHEDULING@PWSEI.COM Contact Country: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 20210628 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Furnace Exemption: No Underground Injection Activity: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20210628 Handler Name: HENRY RUCKER Source Type: Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1062 CABRILLO PARK B-UNIT A Name: HENRY RUCKER Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-362-5335 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1062 CABRILLO PARK B-UNIT A Name: HENRY RUCKER Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-362-5335 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 36 1 of 2 ESE 0.251 145.821 SHELL OIL SERVICE STATION LUST 1,335.24 2 (FORMER TEXACO) 320 TUSTIN AVENUE, N. SANTA ANA CA erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1236 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Global ID: T0605953807 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.747884912 Status Date: 1/6/2005 Longitude:-117.834597293 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083003978T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: How Discovered: Site Assessment/Site Investigation Begin Date: 1/30/2003 Stop Method: Lead Agency: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Stop Description: Local Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Case Worker., CAB CUF Case: NO File Location: Regional Board Potential Media of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supply How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GIN Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 71-75% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 5/2/2007 Action: Site Assessment Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 6/20/2005 Action: Unauthorized Release Form Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 6/20/2005 Action: ' No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 6/20/2005 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 1 /30/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 1/6/2005 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 11/22/2004 Action: Request for Closure Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1237 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 12/31 /2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/1 /2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 7/29/2003 Action: " No Action Action Type: Other Date : 7/21/2003 Action: Leak Reported Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/21/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/23/2003 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 5/20/2003 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 5/9/2003 Action: Site Assessment Report - Regulator Responded Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Other - Regulator Responded Action Type: Other Date: 1/30/2003 Action: Leak Discovery LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Email: City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: Contact Name: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO Email: City: SANTA ANA Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA, CITY OF LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 1/6/2005 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date: 1/30/2003 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 1/30/2003 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 carl.bernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov 9517824495 1439 S. BROADWAY cciraulo@santa-ana.org Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1238 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB (mi/ft) (ft) Site Facility Name: SHELL OIL SERVICE STATION (FORMER Potential COC: GASOLINE TEXACO) Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: 320 TUSTIN AVENUE, N. WDR Place Type: City: SANTA ANA WDR File: Zip: WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: CUF Claim: CUF Amount Paid: File Location: REGIONAL BOARD Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0605953807 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 1/6/2005 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report_include?global_id=T0605953807&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: AQUIFER USED FOR DRINKING WATER SUPPLY User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GW Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) (LEAD) - CASE #: 083003978T CASEWORKER: CARL BERNHARDT SANTA ANA, CITY OF CASEWORKER: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date : 1/6/2005 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date : 1/30/2003 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Date: 1 /30/2003 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Phase II Site Assessment Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Unauthorized Release Form Response Requested - Reports 5/2/2007 5/2/2007 Site Assessment Report https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605953807&doc_id=5838855 Response Requested - Other 6/20/2005 6/22/2005 Unauthorized Release Form erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1239 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 6/20/2005 Received Issue Date: 6/22/2005 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Report - Phase II Site Assessment Report Action Type: Enforcement - Other Action Date: 6/20/2005 Received Issue Date: 6/20/2005 Action: ' No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Results of divesring property investigaton indicate low diesel in soil, should not reopen case Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 1/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 1/14/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 4th Qtr 2004 Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 1/6/2005 Received Issue Date: 1/6/2005 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605953807&enforcement_id=5905598&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Shell Oil Service Station Case Closure Summary Action Type: Response Requested - Other Action Date: 11/22/2004 Received Issue Date: 11/22/2004 Action: Request for Closure Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Request for Closure Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2004 Received Issue Date: 10/21/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 3rd Qtr 2004 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2004 Received Issue Date: 7/20/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 2nd Qtr 2004 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1240 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 4/30/2004 4/9/2004 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Monitoring Report -Quarterly - 1 st Qtr 2004 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: 4Q 2003 GWM Report - 4th Qtr 2003 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: 3Q 2003 GWM Report - 3rd Qtr 2003 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 12/31 /2003 12/31 /2003 Monitoring Report - Quarterly https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605953807&doc_id=5602063 Response Requested - Reports 10/1 /2003 10/1 /2003 Monitoring Report - Quarterly https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605953807&doc_id=5509794 Enforcement - Other 7/29/2003 7/29/2003 No Action Response Requested - Reports 7/21 /2003 7/21 /2003 Monitoring Report - Quarterly https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605953807&doc_id=5507184 2Q 2003 GWM Report - 2nd Qtr 2003 Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 5/23/2003 Received Issue Date: 5/23/2003 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605953807&enforcement_id=6242673&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Review - GRASP Site Assessment Report Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 5/20/2003 Received Issue Date: 5/20/2003 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605953807&enforcement_id=6242675&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Review - GRASP Monitoring Report DB City Council 18 — 1241 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: GRASP Site Assessment Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: GRASP Monitoring Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: 5/9/2003 5/9/2003 Site Assessment Report - Regulator Responded https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605953807&doc_id=5838856 Response Requested - Reports 4/30/2003 4/30/2003 Monitoring Report - Other - Regulator Responded https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605953807&doc_id=5838857 Leak Action 7/21 /2003 Leak Reported Leak Action 1 /30/2003 Leak Discovery LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Site Maps (as of May 29, 2021) Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/8972333610/T0605953807.pdf Size : 36 KB Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 3/10/2004 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of Mav 29. 2021 DB Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 5/2/2007 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted: Title: PHASE II SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605953807&document_id=5838855 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 1/6/2005 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: SHELL OIL SERVICE STATION CASE CLOSURE SUMMARY Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605953807&enforcement_id=5905598 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 277 KB Document Date: 12/31/2003 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 4Q 2003 GWM REPORT - 4Q 2003 GWM REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/deliverable_documents/6632342278/4Q%202003%20GWM% 20Report%2Epdf Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 258 KB Document Date: 10/1/2003 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1242 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: 3Q 2003 GWM REPORT - 3Q 2003 GWM REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/deliverable_documents/8669344842/3Q%202003%20GWM% 20Report%2Epdf Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 243 KB Document Date: 7/21/2003 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 2Q 2003 GWM REPORT - 2Q 2003 GWM REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/deliverable_documents/6500822305/2Q%202003%20GWM% 20Report%2Epdf Document Type: Site Documents Size Document Date: 5/23/2003 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REVIEW - GRASP SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605953807&enforcement_id=6242673 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 5/20/2003 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REVIEW - GRASP MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605953807&enforcement_id=6242675 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 5/9/2003 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted: Title: GRASP SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605953807&document_id=5838856 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 243 KB Document Date: 4/30/2003 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - OTHER Submitted: Title: GRASP MONITORING REPORT - GRASP MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/deliverable_documents/4784031510/GRASP%20Monitoring% 20Report%2Epdf 36 2 of 2 ESE 0.251 145.821 LEGTION AUTO SERVICES RCRA TSD 1,335.24 2 320 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAL000445221 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: RAY PAKDELAN Contact Address: 320 N TUSTIN AVE_ , SANTA ANA , CA, 92705, Contact Phone No and Ext.- 714-997-5825 Contact Email: LEGIONAUTOSERVICES@GMAIL.COM Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Receive Date: 20190415 Location Latitude: 33.747831 Location Longitude: -117.83416 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1243 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190415 Handler Name: LEGTION AUTO SERVICES Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 320 N TUSTIN AVE Name: RAY PAKDELAN Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-997-5825 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 195 EUCALYPTUS DR Name: SAKINEH ZAHEDTALAB Street 2: Date Became Current: City: ANAHEIM Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-997-5825 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92808 37 1 of 1 SE 0.271 137.921 A RISING BUILDERS RCRA TSD 1,403.40 -6 2202 E 1ST STREET ORANGE CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003007418 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: ROBERT BELLUCCI Contact Address: 151 KLAMUS DRIVE UNIT #H6 , , COSTA MESA, CA, 92626, Contact Phone No and Ext. 310-984-9037 Contact Email: TSTEVENS@AMERICAN-INTEGRATED.COM Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Receive Date: 20190326 Location Latitude: 33.745561 Location Longitude: -117.835902 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summary erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1244 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190326 Handler Name: A RISING BUILDERS Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details DB Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 151 KLAMUS DRIVE UNIT #H6 Name: A RISING BUILDERS Street 2: Date Became Current: City: COSTA MESA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 310-984-9037 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92626 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 151 KLAMUS DRIVE UNIT #H6 Name: ROBERT BELLUCCI Street 2: Date Became Current: City. COSTA MESA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 310-984-9037 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92626 38 1 of 1 SE 0.271 137.051 SANTA ANA HONDA 1,432.64 -7 LUST 2114 E 1ST ST SANTA ANA CA 92707 Global ID: T0605901901 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.744931 Status Date: 6/5/1996 Longitude: -117.836473 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083002758T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: How Discovered: Begin Date: 10/18/1995 Stop Method: Lead Agency. SANTA ANA, CITY OF Stop Description: Local Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Case Worker. CC CUF Case: NO File Location: Potential Media of Concern: Soil How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1245 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 71-75% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 2/22/2006 Action: . No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/28/1996 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: Other Date : 10/19/1995 Action: Leak Reported Action Type: Other Date : 10/18/1995 Action: Leak Discovery LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1439 S. BROADWAY Contact Name: CHRISTOPHERCIRAULO Email: cciraulo@santa-ana.org City: SANTA ANA Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: Contact Name: VALERIEJAHN-BULL Email: City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 6/5/1996 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 10/18/1995 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile Site Facility Name: SANTA ANA HONDA Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Project Status: WDR Place Type: WDR File: WDR Order: CUF Priority Assig: CUF Amount Paid: File Location: Designated Beneficial Use: Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: Cleanup Status Detail: Cleanup History Link: Potential Media of Concern: User Defined Beneficial Use: Potential COC: Facility Type: Composting Method: Address: City: Zip: County: CUF Claim: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.gov 9517824903 GASOLINE 2114E1STST SANTA ANA 92707 ORANGE MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. DB https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?g lobal_id=T0605901901 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 6/5/1996 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report _include?global_id=T0605901901 &tabname=regulatoryhistory SOIL erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1246 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB (mi/ft) (ft) DWR GW Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA ANA, CITY OF (LEAD) CASEWORKER: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) - CASE #: 083002758T CASEWORKER: VALERIE JAHN-BULL Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date: 6/5/1996 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date: 10/18/1995 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Enforcement - Other Action Date: 2/22/2006 Received Issue Date: 2/22/2006 Action: ' No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 5/28/1996 Received Issue Date: 5/28/1996 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605901901 &enforcement_id=6324988&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 10/19/1995 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 10/18/1995 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Discovery Doc Link: Title Description Comments: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of May 29, 2021) Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 5/28/1996 Submitted By: SANGAVI PARI (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: UNKNOWN Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605901901 &enforcement_id=6324988 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1247 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) 39 1 of 1 NNW 0.27/ 155.911 JOHN GALLIE RCRA TSD 1,441.33 12 1109 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003020236 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: JOHN GALLIE Contact Address: 1109 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext.- 714-972-1367 Contact Email: NANCYRUIZ@ALLIANCE-ENVIRO.COM Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Receive Date: 20190618 Location Latitude: 33.754932 Location Longitude: -117.840641 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner: No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190618 Handler Name: JOHN GALLIE Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1109 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE Name: JOHN GALLIE Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-972-1367 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1109 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE Name: JOHN GALLIE Street2: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1248 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-972-1367 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 40 1 of 2 E 0.291 148.151 SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US LUST 1,541.03 4 401 N. TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA ANA CA Global ID: T0605934780 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.748372493 Status Date: 12/23/2013 Longitude:-117.834067052 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 08303690T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: How Discovered. Site Assessment/Site Investigation Begin Date: 2/2/2003 Stop Method: Lead Agency. SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Stop Description: Local Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Case Worker. CAB CUF Case: NO File Location: Potential Media of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supply How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GIN Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 61-65% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/23/2013 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/18/2013 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 8/15/2013 Action: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 4/3/2013 Action: Request for Closure - Regulator Responded Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/23/2012 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 2/29/2012 Action: Well Installation Workplan Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 1 /30/2012 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2011 Action: Monitorinq Report - Semi -Annually erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1249 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 1 /30/2011 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2010 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 3/30/2010 Action: Well Installation Workplan Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 3/26/2010 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1/30/2010 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2009 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2009 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 7/29/2009 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 4/30/2009 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 3/12/2009 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 1 /30/2009 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1 /21 /2009 Action: Pilot Study / Treatability Workplan Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/30/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1/30/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1250 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 7/25/2007 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 5/30/2007 Action: Interim Remedial Action Plan Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 4/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 4/30/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 1 /30/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1/30/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 1 /30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1251 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Date : 10/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 8/15/2003 Action: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 7/29/2003 Action: " No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 6/13/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: Other Date : 2/2/2003 Action: Leak Reported Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 2/2/2003 Action: Action Type: Other Date : 2/2/2003 Action: Leak Discovery LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Email: carl.bernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: 9517824495 Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1439 S. BROADWAY Contact Name: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO Email: cciraulo@santa-ana.org City: SANTA ANA Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA, CITY OF LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 12/23/2013 Status: Open - Eligible for Closure Status Date: 6/7/2013 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 2/2/2003 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date: 2/2/2003 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Reaulatory Profile Site Facility Name: SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: 401 N. TUSTIN AVENUE WDR Place Type: City: SANTA ANA WDR File: Zip: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1252 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB (mi/ft) (ft) WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: CUF Claim: CUF Amount Paid: File Location: Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0605934780 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 12/23/2013 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report_include?global_id=T0605934780&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: AQUIFER USED FOR DRINKING WATER SUPPLY User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GIN Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) (LEAD) - CASE #: 08303690T CASEWORKER: CARL BERNHARDT SANTA ANA, CITY OF CASEWORKER: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO Gndwater Monitoring Freque: # OF WELLS MONITORED - QUARTERLY: 2, SEMI-ANNUALLY: 3 REASONS FOR QUARTERLY OR MONTHLY OR OTHER GROUNDWATER MONITORING: Well Being Sampled Within First Year of Being Installed - Two wells proposed to be installed at the site Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date : 12/23/2013 Status: Open - Eligible for Closure Date: 6/7/2013 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Date : 2/2/2003 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date : 2/2/2003 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Action Report (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: UNKNOWN Phase: Contaminant Mass Removed: Description: Begin Date: 2/2/2003 End Date: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 12/23/2013 Received Issue Date: 12/23/2013 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_id=6186574&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: NFA Letter and Case Closure Summary Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1253 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Date: 10/18/2013 Received Issue Date: 10/18/2013 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_id=6179641 &temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Request for Well Abandonment prior to NFA letter Action Type: Notices Action Date: 8/15/2013 Received Issue Date: 8/15/2013 Action: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_ id=6171864&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: 60-day Notice of Closure and Draft Closure Summary Action Type: Response Requested - Other Action Date: 4/3/2013 Received Issue Date: 4/3/2013 Action: Request for Closure - Regulator Responded Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5771780 Title Description Comments: - Requested list of current and adjacent property owners for 60-day public notice Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/23/2012 Received Issue Date: 7/23/2012 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5759899 Title Description Comments: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT -SECOND QUARTER 2012 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Work Plan Addendun Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Workplans 2/29/2012 2/29/2012 Well Installation Workplan https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5759898 Response Requested - Reports 1 /30/2012 1 /20/2012 Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5731839 4th Qtr 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Report Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2011 Received Issue Date: 7/20/2011 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5731840 Title Description Comments: 2nd Qtr 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Report erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1254 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 1/30/2011 Received Issue Date: 1/28/2010 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5714399 Title Description Comments: 4th Qtr 2010 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2010 Received Issue Date: 7/22/2010 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5714400 Title Description Comments: 2nd Qtr 2010 Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans Action Date: 3/30/2010 Received Issue Date: 3/26/2010 Action: Well Installation Workplan Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5714398 Title Description Comments: Workplan for Well Installation Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans Action Date: 3/26/2010 Received Issue Date: 3/26/2010 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5671658 Title Description Comments: Work Plan for Well Installaiton Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 1/30/2010 Received Issue Date: 1/27/2010 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: https:Hgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=TO605934780&doc_id=5650219 Title Description Comments: Semiannual; Monitoring Report 4th Qtr 2009 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2009 Received Issue Date: 1/27/2010 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5650390 Title Description Comments: Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2009 Received Issue Date: 7/29/2009 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5650571 Title Description Comments: 2nd Qtr 2009 Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 7/29/2009 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1255 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: 7/29/2009 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_ id=6031361 &temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Monitoring Reduction Letter Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 4/30/2009 Received Issue Date: 4/24/2009 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5650071 Title Description Comments: 1 st Qtr 2009 Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 3/12/2009 Received Issue Date: 3/12/2009 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_id=6008323&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Work Plan for Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 1/30/2009 Received Issue Date: 1/28/2009 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5651302 Title Description Comments: 4th Qtr 2008 Groundwater Monitoring Report Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans Action Date: 1/21/2009 Received Issue Date: 1/21/2009 Action: Pilot Study / Treatability Workplan Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5651528 Title Description Comments: Work Plan for SVE Well Installation and Pilot Test Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: 3rd Qtr 2008 Monitoring Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 10/30/2008 10/24/2008 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Response Requested - Reports 7/30/2008 7/28/2008 Monitoring Report - Quarterly https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5573208 Second Quarter 2008 Groundwater Monitoring Report Action Type: Response Reauested - erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1256 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Date: 4/30/2008 Received Issue Date: 5/1/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5572143 Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 1/30/2008 Received Issue Date: 1/29/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 4th Qtr 2007 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 10/30/2007 10/16/2007 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 3rd Qtr 2007 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 7/30/2007 7/30/2007 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 2nd Qtr 2007 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Approval for SVE Pilot Test Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Other Regulatory Actions 7/25/2007 7/25/2007 Staff Letter https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_id=5950633&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Response Requested - Workplans 5/30/2007 5/29/2007 Interim Remedial Action Plan Interim Remedial Action Plan - SVE Pilot Test Work Plan Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 4/30/2007 5/2/2007 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Monitoring Report -Quarterly - 1 st Qtr 2007 Action erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Urcter NO: 2112l bUUUbb uty uouncii lb — "125 / "I U/3/ZUL3 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Date: 1/30/2007 Received Issue Date: 1/26/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 4th Qtr 2006 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2006 Received Issue Date: 10/27/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 3rd Qtr 2006 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2006 Received Issue Date: 7/14/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 2nd Qtr 2006 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 4/30/2006 Received Issue Date: 4/18/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report -Quarterly - 1 st Qtr 2006 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 1/30/2006 Received Issue Date: 2/1/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0605934780&doc_id=5571458 Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 4th Qtr 2005 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 10/21/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 3rd Qtr 2005 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 7/27/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 2nd Qtr 2005 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1258 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Date: 4/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 5/1/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 1 st Qtr 2005 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 1/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 1/14/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 4th Qtr 2004 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2004 Received Issue Date: 10/20/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 3rd Qtr 2004 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2004 Received Issue Date: 7/20/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 2nd Qtr 2004 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 4/30/2004 Received Issue Date: 3/29/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report -Quarterly - 1 st Qtr 2004 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 1/30/2004 Received Issue Date: 1/27/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 4th Qtr 2003 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2003 Received Issue Date: 10/22/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 3rd Qtr 2003 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1259 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Date: 8/15/2003 Received Issue Date: 8/15/2003 Action: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2003 Received Issue Date: 7/25/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 2nd Qtr 2003 Action Type: Enforcement - Other Action Date: 7/29/2003 Received Issue Date: 7/29/2003 Action: No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 6/13/2003 Received Issue Date: 6/13/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Report - GRASP Site Assessment Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Leak Action 2/2/2003 Leak Discovery Leak Action 2/2/2003 Leak Reported Cleanup Action 2/2/2003 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Site Maps (as of May 29, 2021) Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/3826867520/TO60593478O.PDF Size : 209 KB Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 7/29/2009 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1260 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/9318743050/T0605934780.PDF Size : 204 KB Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 4/28/2009 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/9582352161 /T0605934780. PD F Size : 739 KB Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 1 /28/2009 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/l 178859889/T0605934780.PDF Size : 261 KB Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 10/22/2008 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/7446318686/TO60593478O.PDF Size : 783 KB Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 8/13/2008 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/2086377799/TO60593478O.pdf Size : 19 KB Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 3/10/2004 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/l817624747/T0605934780.PDF Size : 202 KB Submitted By: DONNA NGO (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /3/2003 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of Mav 29. 2021 DB Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 12/23/2013 Submitted By: CARL BERNHARDT (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: NFA LETTER AND CASE CLOSURE SUMMARY Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_id=6186574 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 5,582 KB Document Date: 12/11/2013 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: WELL DESTRUCTION REPORT Submitted: Title: WELL DESTRUCTION REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3179903149/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 10/18/2013 Submitted By: CARL BERNHARDT (REGULATOR) Type: TECHNICAL CORRESPONDENCE / Submitted: ASSISTANCE / OTHER Title: REQUEST FOR WELL ABANDONMENT PRIOR TO NFA LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_id=6179641 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 8/15/2013 Submitted By: CARL BERNHARDT (REGULATOR) Type: NOTIFICATION - PUBLIC NOTICE OF CASE Submitted: CLOSURE Title: 60-DAY NOTICE OF CLOSURE AND DRAFT CLOSURE SUMMARY Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_id=6171864 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 72 KB Document Date: 7/26/2013 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE Submitted: Title: CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER TRANSITION erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1261 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9035088717/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 2,809 KB Document Date: 7/25/2013 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - OTHER Submitted: Title: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - SECOND QUARTER 2013 AND REQUEST FOR RESCISSION OF ASSESSMENT WORKPLAN Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5030275464/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 74 KB Document Date: 7/8/2013 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE Submitted: Title: SHELL PROGRAM MANAGER TRANSITION Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7198976635/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 13,269 KB Document Date: 4/3/2013 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: REQUEST FOR CLOSURE Submitted: Title: SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND LOW- THREAT CLOSURE REQUEST Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1499238491/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 3,184 KB Document Date: 1 /28/2013 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - OTHER Submitted: Title: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - FOURTH QUARTER 2012 AND REQUEST FOR RESCISSION OF ASSESSMENT WORKPLAN Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5518998622/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 5,970 KB Document Date: 7/23/2012 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT -SECOND QUARTER 2012 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6701924145/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 2,930 KB Document Date: 2/29/2012 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN ADDENDUM Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7326212584/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 3,785 KB Document Date: 1/25/2012 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - FOURTH QUARTER 2011 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3722244203/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,397 KB Document Date: 7/28/2011 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - SECOND QUARTER 2011 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2725646913/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,845 KB Document Date: 1/27/2011 Submitted By: GHD (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted: Title: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT -FOURTH QUARTER 2010 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7659235656/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 9,277 KB Document Date: 7/22/2010 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted: Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT SECOND QUARTER 2010 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2993821144/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 6,681 KB Document Date: 3/26/2010 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: WELL INSTALLATION WORKPLAN Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN FOR GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9041528165/TO605934780.PDF erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1262 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,982 KB Document Date: 1/27/2010 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted: Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT FOURTH QUARTER 2009 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9996087193/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 29,701 KB Document Date: 1/19/2010 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT Submitted: Title: ADDITIONAL SITE ASSESSMENT, SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (SVE) WELL INSTALLATION AND PILOT TEST REPORT REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2645150601/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 5,009 KB Document Date: 7/29/2009 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: SECOND QUARTER 2009 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8992623448/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 7/29/2009 Submitted By: CARL BERNHARDT (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: MONITORING REDUCTION LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605934780&enforeement_id=6031361 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,392 KB Document Date: 4/24/2009 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: FIRST QUARTER 2009 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9845474720/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 3/12/2009 Submitted By: CARL BERNHARDT (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605934780&enforeement_id=6008323 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 7,214 KB Document Date: 1/27/2009 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: FOURTH QUARTER 2008 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1187511622/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 6,180 KB Document Date: 1/21/2009 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: OTHER WORKPLAN Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN FOR SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL INSTALLATION AND SVE PILOT TESTING Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3007821202/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,011 KB Document Date: 10/22/2008 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: THIRD QUARTER 2008 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3784026205/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 4,093 KB Document Date: 10/15/2008 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: OTHER WORKPLAN Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8249379038/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 6,023 KB Document Date: 7/25/2008 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: SECOND QUARTER 2008 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4253926157/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,585 KB erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1263 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Document Date: 4/30/2008 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: FIRST QUARTER 2008 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3129944324/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 13,377 KB Document Date: 4/17/2008 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS -OTHER Submitted: Title: SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL INSTALLATION AND PILOT TEST REPORT -1 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8250946521/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 9,663 KB Document Date: 4/17/2008 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS -OTHER Submitted: Title: SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL INSTALLATION AND PILOT TEST REPORT -2 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1051880359/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 19 KB Document Date: 2/11/2008 Submitted By: CARL BERNHARDT (REGULATOR) Type: LETTER Submitted: Title: APRROVAL LETTER FOR SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION PILOT TEST Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/site_documents/1244236588/Katz%5FMarvin%5FShell%5FOil% 5FProductsUS%5FNTustinAve%5FSanta%2Epdf Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,383 KB Document Date: 1/30/2008 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: FOURTH QUARTER 2007 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6255373895/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 52 KB Document Date: 12/10/2007 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE -OTHER Submitted: Title: CONFIRMATION OF VERBAL AGREEMENT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4901349723/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 2,022 KB Document Date: 10/15/2007 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: THIRD QUARTER 2007 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5249562144/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,848 KB Document Date: 7/30/2007 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: SECOND QUARTER 2007 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2195376336/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 7/25/2007 Submitted By: CARL BERNHARDT (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: APPROVAL FOR SVE PILOT TEST Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605934780&enforcement_id=5950633 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 5,818 KB Document Date: 5/30/2007 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: WORKPLANS - REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN FOR SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL INSTALLATION AND PILOT TESTING Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5987746298/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 4,135 KB Document Date: 5/30/2007 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: WORKPLANS - REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN FOR SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL INSTALLATION AND PILOT TESTING Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7868743002/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,708 KB Document Date: 4/27/2007 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1264 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: FIRST QUAARTER 2007 GROUNWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1965391397/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,230 KB Document Date: 1/30/2007 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: FOURTH QUARTER 2006 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8599608480/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,226 KB Document Date: 10/27/2006 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: THIRD QUARTER 2006 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2372805535/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,787 KB Document Date: 8/18/2006 Submitted By: DELTA CONSULTANTS (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: SECOND QUARTER 2006 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6733004510/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 3,644 KB Document Date: 4/27/2006 Submitted By: DONNA NGO (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 1Q06 GW MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1367556512/T0605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 3,854 KB Document Date: 2/1/2006 Submitted By: DONNA NGO (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 4Q05 GW MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5598844766/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 3,111 KB Document Date: 10/24/2005 Submitted By: DONNA NGO (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 3Q05 GW MONITORING REPORT (DATE 10-20-05) Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7134673893/TO605934780.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 2,520 KB Document Date: 8/5/2005 Submitted By: DONNA NGO (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: SECOND QUARTER 2005 GW MONITORING REPORT (DATE 7-25-05) Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8608686149/TO605934780.PDF 40 Global ID: Status: Status Date: Case Type: Date Source: 2 of 2 E 0.291 148.151 SHELL #401 1,541.03 4 401 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 LUST T0605900685 County: ORANGE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.748536 5/9/1991 Longitude:-117.833745 LUST CLEANUP SITE LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083000867T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: How Discovered: Tank Closure Begin Date: 4/18/1988 Stop Method: Lead Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Stop Description: Local Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Case Worker. CC CUF Case: YES File Location: Potential Media of Concern: Soil How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1265 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 61-65% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/9/1991 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: Other Date: 9/6/1989 Action: Leak Stopped Action Type: Other Date : 9/6/1989 Action: Leak Discovery Action Type: Other Date : 4/18/1988 Action: Leak Reported LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1439 S. BROADWAY Contact Name: CHRISTOPHERCIRAULO Email: cciraulo@santa-ana.org City: SANTA ANA Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Email: carl.bernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: 9517824495 Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 5/9/1991 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 3/2/1990 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 5/31/1988 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 4/18/1988 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Reoulatory Profile Site Facility Name: SHELL #401 Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: 401 N TUSTIN AVE WDR Place Type: City: SANTA ANA WDR File: Zip: 92705 WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: D CUF Claim: 16727 CUF Amount Paid: File Location: Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1266 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: Cleanup Status Detail: Cleanup History Link: Potential Media of Concern: User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR G W Sub Basin: Calwater Watershed Name: Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Desc: Site History: No site history available DB https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?g lobal_id=T0605900685 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 5/9/1991 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report_ include?global_id=T0605900685&tabname=regulatoryhistory SOIL Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) SANTA ANA, CITY OF (LEAD) CASEWORKER: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) - CASE #: 083000867T CASEWORKER: CARL BERNHARDT Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date: 5/9/1991 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date : 3/2/1990 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date : 5/31/1988 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date: 4/18/1988 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Other Regulatory Actions 5/9/1991 5/9/1991 Closure/No Further Action Letter https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605900685&enforcement_id=5902500&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Leak Action 9/6/1989 Leak Discovery Leak Action 9/6/1989 Leak Stopped Leak Action 4/18/1988 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1267 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of Mav 29. 2021 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 5/9/1991 Submitted By: (REGULATOR), SANGAVI PARI (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: URR WAS DATED 9/14/89 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605900685&enforcement_id=5902500 41 1 of 1 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: EPA Region: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: Handler Summa ENE 0.301 154.741 MARYAM GHASEMYEH DDS 1,562.32 11 801 N TUSTIN AVE STE 400 SANTA ANA CA 92705-0000 CAL000224454 No Report DR MARYAM GHASEMYEH CEO 801 N TUSTIN STE 400 , , SANTA ANA , CA, 92705, 714-547-9411 MARYAMDDS@YAHOO.COM ORANGE 09 20010709 33.752511 -117.834176 DB RCRA TSD NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20010709 Handler Name: MARYAM GHASEMYEH DDS Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1268 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Records (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 801 N TUSTIN STE 400 Name: DR MARYAM GHASEMYEH CEO Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-547-9411 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 801 N TUSTIN AVE #400 Name: MARYAM GHASEMYEH, DDS. INC Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-547-9411 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705-0000 42 1 of 1 ESE 0.301 146.411 CHEVRON #9-7601 1,580.02 2 LUST 325 TUSTIN AVE. N SANTA ANA CA 92705 Global ID: T0605990440 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.747888 Status Date: 7/24/2006 Longitude: -117.833718 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083003914T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: How Discovered: Site Assessment/Site Investigation Begin Date: 12/11/1998 Stop Method: Lead Agency: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Stop Description: Local Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Case Worker. MAO CUF Case: YES File Location: Regional Board Potential Media of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 56-60% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Reaulatory Activit Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 7/24/2006 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 2/23/2006 Action: , No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 2/14/2006 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 8/2/2005 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Action Type: ENFORCEMENT erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1269 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Date : 9/27/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 6/22/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 4/20/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 4/20/2004 Action: Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/15/2003 Action: Other Workplan Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/19/2003 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 6/12/2001 Action: Site Assessment Report Action Type: Other Date : 9/19/2000 Action: Leak Reported Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 2/15/1999 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: REMEDIATION Date : 12/11/1998 Action: Action Type: Other Date: 12/11 /1998 Action: Leak Discovery LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: Contact Name: MIGUELOVIEDO Email: City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: Contact Name: CHRISTOPHERCIRAULO Email: City: SANTA ANA Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA, CITY OF LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 7/24/2006 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date: 5/3/2006 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 miguel.oviedo@waterboards.ca.gov 9517823238 1439 S. BROADWAY cciraulo@santa-ana.org Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1270 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 4/21/2004 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 1/24/2002 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 12/11/1998 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Reaulatory Profile Site Facility Name: CHEVRON #9-7601 Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: 325 TUSTIN AVE. N WDR Place Type: City. SANTA ANA WDR File: Zip: 92705 WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: D CUF Claim: 15970 DB CUF Amount Paid: File Location: REGIONAL BOARD Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0605990440 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 7/24/2006 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report_include?global_id=T0605990440&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER) User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GIN Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) (LEAD) - CASE #: 083003914T CASEWORKER: MIGUEL OVIEDO SANTA ANA, CITY OF CASEWORKER: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanun Status Histo Status: Completed - Case Closed Date : 7/24/2006 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Date : 5/3/2006 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 4/21 /2004 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date : 1/24/2002 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date : 12/11/1998 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Action Report (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: UNKNOWN Begin Date: 4/20/2004 Phase: End Date: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1271 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Contaminant Mass Removed: Description: Action Type: UNKNOWN Begin Date: 12/11/1998 Phase: End Date: Contaminant Mass Removed: Description: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 7/24/2006 Received Issue Date: 7/24/2006 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605990440&enforcement_id=6104922&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: Enforcement - Other Action Date: 2/23/2006 Received Issue Date: 2/23/2006 Action: ' No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Enforcement/Orders Action Date: 2/14/2006 Received Issue Date: 2/14/2006 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Doc Link: Title Description Comments: 4th Quarter 2005 Groundwater Monitoring Report Action Type: Enforcement/Orders Action Date: 8/2/2005 Received Issue Date: 8/2/2005 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Second Quarter 2005 Groundwater Monitoring Report Action Type: Enforcement/Orders Action Date: 9/27/2004 Received Issue Date: 9/27/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Doc Link: Title Description Comments: First Quarter 2005 Groundwater Monitoring Report Action Type: Enforcement/Orders Action Date: 6/22/2004 Received Issue Date: 6/22/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Doc Link: Title Description Comments: 2nd Quarter 2004 GMR and progress report erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1272 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: Enforcement/Orders Action Date: 4/20/2004 Received Issue Date: 4/20/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Additional site assessment workplan - Well installation report Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 5/19/2003 Received Issue Date: 5/19/2003 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Request for additional site assessment workplan Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Site Assessment Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Facility Upgrade Summary Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 6/12/2001 6/12/2001 Site Assessment Report https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605990440&doc_id=5836280 Response Requested - Reports 2/15/1999 2/15/1999 Soil and Water Investigation Report https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_docu ments_all?global_id=T0605990440&doc_id=5836279 Cleanup Action 4/20/2004 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2003 Received Issue Date: Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 3rd Quarter 2003 monitoring report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Additional Information Workplan Action Type: Action Date: Response Requested - Workplans 7/15/2003 Other Workplan Leak Action 9/19/2000 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1273 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 12/11/1998 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Discovery Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Cleanup Action Action Date: 12/11/1998 Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Site Maps (as of May 29, 2021) Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/8890156626/TO60599044O.pdf Size : 121 KB Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Submitted: 10/18/2006* Title: GEO_BORE (SB-2) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/5079151749/TO605990440.pdf Size : 199 KB Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Submitted: 5/18/2006 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/2090635538/TO60599044O.pdf Size : 200 KB Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Submitted: 5/18/2006 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/2033918082/TO60599044O.pdf Size : 108 KB Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Submitted: 1 /29/2004* LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of May 29, 2021) Document Type: Site Documents Size : 2,458 KB Document Date: 10/18/2006* Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: REPORTS -OTHER Submitted: Title: WELL DESTRUCTION REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9249285638/TO605990440.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 2,854 KB Document Date: 8/15/2006* Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 2ND QUARTER 2006 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND PROGRESS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/l827512979/T0605990440.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 7/24/2006 Submitted By: (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605990440&enforcement_id=6104922 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1274 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Document Type: Site Documents Size : 4,282 KB Document Date: 5/18/2006 Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: REPORTS -OTHER Submitted: Title: CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5318555533/TO605990440.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 2,179 KB Document Date: 5/2/2006 Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: FIRST QUARTER 2006 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND PROGRESS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/l611591935/T0605990440.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 2,282 KB Document Date: 2/1/2006* Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: FOURTH QUARTER 2005 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8444989860/TO605990440.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,946 KB Document Date: 10/26/2005* Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 3RD QUARTER 2005 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND PROGRESS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8847717106/TO605990440.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,238 KB Document Date: 7/29/2005 Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 1Q2005 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4005414664/TO605990440.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,145 KB Document Date: 6/21/2005 Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: WORKPLANS - OTHER WP Submitted: Title: CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLING WORKPLAN Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3112775504/TO605990440.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 39 KB Document Date: 4/29/2005 Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: CORRESPONDENCE -OTHER Submitted: Title: CHANGE OF CONTACT INFORMATION FOR CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8498960196/TO605990440.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,113 KB Document Date: 4/27/2005 Submitted By: JASON LEE (RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 1ST QUARTER 2005 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND PROGRESS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7746671378/T0605990440.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 6/12/2001 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted: Title: SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605990440&document_id=5836280 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 2/15/1999 Submitted By: PAMELA YBARRA (REGULATOR) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION Submitted: REPORT Title: FACILITY UPGRADE SUMMARY REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605990440&document_id=5836279 43 1 of 1 ENE 0.321 156.671 SHELL STATION 1,689.89 12 889 N TUSTIN AVE LOP ORANGE ORANGE CA 92866 Record ID: R00003172 Case Closed Date: 4/12/2004 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1275 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Case ID: 03UT016 Type of Closure: Closure certification issued Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded 44 1 of 4 ESE 0.321 141.891 THRIFTY OIL LUST 1,692.59 -2 101 TUSTIN TUSTIN CA 92680 Global ID: T0605900843 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.7457867 Status Date: 3/11/1998 Longitude:-117.8343824 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083001069T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: 91 UT029 How Discovered: Tank Closure Begin Date: 2/19/1991 Stop Method: Close and Remove Tank Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Stop Description: Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: SR CUF Case: YES File Location: Local Agency Potential Media of Concern: Soil How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 71-75% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: Other Date: 2/19/1991 Action: Leak Reported Action Type: Date: Action: Other 2/19/1991 Leak Discovery LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120 Contact Name: SITYAMALA RAJAGOPAL Email: srajagopal@ochca.com City: SANTA ANA Phone No: 7144336262 Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 Contact Name: VALERIEJAHN-BULL Email: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.gov City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: 9517824903 Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 3/11/1998 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 2/19/1991 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1276 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB (mi/ft) (ft) LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile Site Facility Name: THRIFTY OIL Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method. Project Status: Address: 101 TUSTIN WDR Place Type: City: TUSTIN WDR File: Zip: 92680 WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: C CUF Claim: 13537 CUFAmountPaid: $27,506 File Location: LOCAL AGENCY Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0605900843 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 3/11/1998 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report_include?global_id=TO605900843&tabname=reguIatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: SOIL User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GW Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: ORANGE COUNTY LOP (LEAD) - CASE #: 91 UT029 CASEWORKER: SITYAMALA RAJAGOPAL SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) - CASE #: 083001069T CASEWORKER: VALERIE JAHN-BULL Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date : 3/11/1998 Status: Date: Open - Case Begin Date 2/19/1991 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 2/19/1991 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Discovery Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 2/19/1991 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: 44 2 of 4 ESE 0.321 141.891 THRIFTY OIL 1,692.59 -2 101 TUSTIN TUSTIN CA 92680 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services LUST Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1277 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Global ID: T0605941193 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.745718 Status Date: 4/18/1991 Longitude:-117.834163 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: Potential COC: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating Local Case No: 88UT169 How Discovered: Tank Closure Begin Date: 9/16/1988 Stop Method: Close and Remove Tank Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Stop Description: Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker. SR CUF Case: NO File Location: Local Agency Potential Media of Concern: Soil How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 71-75% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: Other Date: 9/16/1988 Action: Leak Discovery Action Type: Date : Action: Other 9/16/1988 Leak Reported LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120 Contact Name: SITYAMALA RAJAGOPAL Email: srajagopal@ochca.com City: SANTA ANA Phone No: 7144336262 Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: Contact Name: VALERIEJAHN-BULL Email: City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 4/18/1991 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 9/16/1988 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile Site Facility Name: THRIFTY OIL Potential COC: Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: WDR Place Type: City: WDR File: Zip: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.gov 9517824903 WASTE OIL / MOTOR / HYDRAULIC / LUBRICATING 101 TUSTIN TUSTIN 92680 Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1278 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) WDR Order: CUF Priority Assig: CUF Amount Paid: File Location: Designated Beneficial Use: Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: Cleanup Status Detail: Cleanup History Link: Potential Media of Concern: User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GW Sub Basin: Calwater Watershed Name: Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Desc: Site History: No site history available County: ORANGE CUF Claim: DB LOCALAGENCY MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?g lobal_id=T0605941193 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 4/18/1991 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report_ include?global_id=T0605941193&tabname=regulatoryhistory SOIL Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) ORANGE COUNTY LOP (LEAD) - CASE #: 88UT169 CASEWORKER: SITYAMALA RAJAGOPAL SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) CASEWORKER: VALERIE JAHN-BULL Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date : 4/18/1991 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date : 9/16/1988 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Action Report (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: UNKNOWN Begin Date: Phase: End Date: Contaminant Mass Removed: Description: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 9/16/1988 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Discovery Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 9/16/1988 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: 1/1/1965 1/1/1965 44 3 of 4 ESE 0.321 141.891 THRIFTY OIL 1,692.59 -2 101 N TUSTIN AVE TUSTIN CA 92680 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services LOP ORANGE Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1279 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Record ID: R00002908 Case ID: 88UT169 Released Substance: Waste oil/Used oil Case Closed Date: 4/18/1991 Type of Closure: Closure certification issued DB 44 4 of 4 ESE 0.321 141.891 THRIFTY OIL 1,692.59 -2 101 N TUSTIN AVE LOP ORANGE TUSTIN CA 92680 Record ID: R00001561 Case Closed Date: 3/11 /1998 Case ID: 91 UT029 Type of Closure: Closure certification issued Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded 45 1 of 1 SSE 0.341 134.511 AHLC SANTA ANA FAMILY, A RCRA TSD 1,816.24 -10 CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 2110E 1STST SANTA ANA CA 92705 EPA Handler ID: CAC003012035 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: KIMBERLY CALCIA Contact Address: 16501 VENTURA BLVD, SUITE 400 , , ENCINO , CA, 91436, Contact Phone No and Ext. 818-697-4919 Contact Email: KCALCIA@AMGLAND.COM Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Receive Date: 20190425 Location Latitude: 33.744114 Location Longitude: -117.837189 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner: No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190425 Handler Name: AHLC SANTA ANA FAMILY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified ® erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1280 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 16501 VENTURA BLVD, SUITE 400 Name: AHLC SANTA ANA FAMILY, A CA LP Street 2: Date Became Current: City: ENCINO Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 818-697-4919 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 91436 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 16501 VENTURA BLVD, SUITE 400 Name: KIMBERLY CALCIA Street 2: Date Became Current: city. ENCINO Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 818-697-4919 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 91436 46 1 of 1 SW 0.351 130.871 7-ELEVEN # 34322 DELISTED 1,838.19 -13 1640 E 1ST ST HAZ SANTA ANA CA 92701 Siteid: 87533 Latitude: 33.745421 Longitude: -117.845187 Original Source: CHAZ Record Date: 20-OCT-2017 47 1 of 1 NE 0.361 161.211 WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER - ENVIROSTOR 1,882.71 17 SANTA ANA 1001 N. TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92705 Estor/EPA ID: 71002574 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059075504 Project Manager: Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: ORANGE Address Description: 1001 N. TUSTIN AVENUE Latitude: 33.7531255 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude:-117.8341662 Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Supervisor: Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History: Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Program Type: TIERED PERMIT CalEnviroScreen Score: 51-55% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=71002574 48 1 of 2 NNW 0.411 160.291 BEATRIZ JAUREGUI RCRA TSD 2,163.64 16 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1281 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) UNIT P1 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003014003 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: BEATRIZ JAUREGUI Contact Address: 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE UNIT P1 , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext. 562-754-6552 Contact Email: NANCYRUIZ@ALLIANCE-ENVIRO.COM Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Receive Date: 20190508 Location Latitude: 33.757938 Location Longitude: -117.840218 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner: No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190508 Handler Name: BEATRIZ JAUREGUI Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details DB Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE UNIT P1 Name: BEATRIZ JAUREGUI Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 562-754-6552 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE UNIT P1 Name: BEATRIZ JAUREGUI Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1282 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Phone: 562-754-6552 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 48 2 of 2 EPA Handler ID: Gen Status Universe: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: EPA Region: Receive Date: Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summa Note: Handler Summa NNW 0.411 160.291 MICHAEL TOMASELLO 2,163.64 16 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE UNIT P-11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 CAC003006686 No Report MICHAEL TOMASELLO 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE, UNIT P-11 , SANTA ANA, CA, 92705, 714-316-6124 VIANCATARANGO@ALLIANCE-ENVI RO.COM ORANGE 09 20190321 33.757227 -117.841611 DB RCRA TSD NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter. No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor. No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190321 Handler Name: MICHAEL TOMASELLO Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Type: Other Name: MICHAEL TOMASELLO Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: Phone: 714-316-6124 Source Type: Implementer Street No: Street 1: 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE Street 2: UNIT P-11 City: SANTA ANA State: CA Country: Zip Code: 92705 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1283 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Records (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1345 CABRILLO PARK DRIVE Name: MICHAEL TOMASELLO Street 2: UNIT P-11 Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-316-6124 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92705 49 1 of 1 WSW 0.42/ 131.981 UNOCAL #4991 2,203.05 -12 LUST 1601 E 1ST ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 Global ID: T0605902028 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.745971187 Status Date: 8/1/2007 Longitude: -117.8466352 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083002964T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: How Discovered: Other Means Begin Date: 2/4/1997 Stop Method: Lead Agency: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Stop Description: Local Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Case Worker. CUF Case: YES File Location: Potential Media of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supply How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 71-75% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 11 /9/2007 Action: Unknown Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 10/1/2007 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 8/1 /2007 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 7/24/2007 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 6/22/2007 Action: Notification - Preclosure erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1284 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 6/5/2007 Action: Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 6/4/2007 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 5/14/2007 Action: Well Installation Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 5/14/2007 Action: File review Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 4/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 4/19/2007 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 4/3/2007 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 3/30/2007 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 3/12/2007 Action: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 2/2/2007 Action: Verbal Enforcement Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 1 /31 /2007 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 1/17/2007 Action: Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 1/15/2007 Action: Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 1 /9/2007 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 1/4/2007 Action: Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 12/13/2006 Action: Verbal Communication erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1285 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 11 /30/2006 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11 /15/2006 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 10/17/2006 Action: Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 8/23/2006 Action: Meeting Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 8/7/2006 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 8/4/2006 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 6/20/2006 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/15/2006 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 5/8/2006 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 4/30/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 4/27/2006 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 2/7/2006 Action: File review Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 2/3/2006 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 2/3/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11 /15/2005 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11 /8/2005 Action: . Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1286 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Date : 10/31/2005 Action: " No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/30/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/13/2005 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 9/12/2005 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2005 Action: Other Report / Document Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2005 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 7/27/2005 Action: * No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 5/5/2005 Action: . Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 5/4/2005 Action: " Verbal Communication Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 5/2/2005 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 4/18/2005 Action: " No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 2/2/2005 Action: * No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1/30/2005 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 1/13/2005 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 12/22/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 11 /30/2004 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1287 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11 /30/2004 Action: " No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/30/2004 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 10/27/2004 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 10/26/2004 Action: " No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/21 /2004 Action: * No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 9/30/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 9/16/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 8/31/2004 Action: * No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 8/10/2004 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 5/27/2004 Action: " Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/10/2004 Action: * No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/7/2004 Action: . Verbal Communication Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2004 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 4/5/2004 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 3/30/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 2/27/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 2/5/2004 Action: * No Action erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1288 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 2/2/2004 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 2/2/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 1/22/2004 Action: . No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 12/12/2003 Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/4/2003 Action: * Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/2/2003 Action: . Verbal Communication Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 11 /28/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 11 /25/2003 Action: * Verbal Communication Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/31/2003 Action: Other Report / Document Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/30/2003 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 10/23/2003 Action: . No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 10/10/2003 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/8/2003 Action: * No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 9/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 9/25/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1289 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 8/21 /2003 Action: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 7/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 7/16/2003 Action: * No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 7/3/2003 Action: . No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/22/2003 Action: " No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 5/22/2003 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 5/15/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2003 Action: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 4/30/2003 Action: Other Report / Document Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 4/22/2003 Action: . No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 4/18/2003 Action: " Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 4/15/2003 Action: * Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 4/8/2003 Action: . No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 3/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 3/18/2003 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 3/18/2003 Action: File review Action Type: ENFORCEMENT erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1290 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Date : 1/30/2003 Action: File review Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 1/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 1/30/2003 Action: . No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 1 /10/2003 Action: " Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/18/2002 Action: File review Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 12/17/2002 Action: . Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/5/2002 Action: File review Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 12/5/2002 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 11 /15/2002 Action: CAP/RAP - Other Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 10/30/2002 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 9/10/2002 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 9/4/2002 Action: File review Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 9/4/2002 Action: " No Action Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 8/30/2002 Action: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study Report Action Type: RESPONSE Date : 7/30/2002 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 7/10/2002 Action: " No Action Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 5/22/2002 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 3/21/2002 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1291 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action: . Verbal Communication Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 1 /11 /2002 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 12/16/2001 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 7/19/2001 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date : 4/13/2000 Action: Staff Letter Action Type: Other Date: 2/5/1997 Action: Leak Reported Action Type: Other Date: 2/4/1997 Action: Leak Stopped Action Type: Other Date: 2/4/1997 Action: Leak Discovery LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1439 S. BROADWAY Contact Name: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO Email: cciraulo@santa-ana.org City: SANTA ANA Phone No: Organization Name: SANTA ANA, CITY OF LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 8/1/2007 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 1/31/2007 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 11/13/2006 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 8/7/2006 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 5/8/2006 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date: 4/25/2006 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 2/3/2006 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 7/21/2005 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 5/2/2005 Status: Open - Remediation ensinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1292 DB Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Status Date: 1/24/2005 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 12/17/2004 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 10/22/2004 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 8/10/2004 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 4/30/2004 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 3/8/2004 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 2/2/2004 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 11/14/2003 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 10/20/2003 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 7/14/2003 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 5/2/2003 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 11/13/2002 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 5/22/2002 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 11/27/2001 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 3/23/2000 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 1/1/2000 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 2/4/1997 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 2/4/1997 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile Site Facility Name: UNOCAL #4991 Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: 1601 E 1 ST ST WDR Place Type: City: SANTA ANA WDR File: Zip: 92701 WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: D CUF Claim: 19035 CUF Amount Paid: File Location: Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Project Oversight Agencies: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1293 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0605902028 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 8/1/2007 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report _include?global_id=T0605902028&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: AQUIFER USED FOR DRINKING WATER SUPPLY User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GIN Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) (LEAD) - CASE #: 083002964T SANTA ANA, CITY OF CASEWORKER: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also ind parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Date: 8/1 /2007 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 1 /31 /2007 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 11 /13/2006 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 8/7/2006 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 5/8/2006 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Date: 4/25/2006 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 2/3/2006 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 7/21 /2005 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 5/2/2005 Status: Open - Remediation Date : 1/24/2005 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 12/17/2004 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 10/22/2004 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 8/10/2004 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 4/30/2004 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 3/8/2004 Status: Open - Remediation erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1294 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Date : 2/2/2004 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 11 /14/2003 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 10/20/2003 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 7/14/2003 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date : 5/2/2003 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 11 /13/2002 Status: Open - Remediation Date: 5/22/2002 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 11 /27/2001 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 3/23/2000 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 1 /1 /2000 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date: 2/4/1997 Status: Open - Site Assessment Date: 2/4/1997 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Action Report (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (SVE) Begin Date: Phase: Other (See Description) End Date: Contaminant Mass Removed: Description: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Response Requested - Other Action Date: *11/9/2007 Received Issue Date: 1/8/2008 Action: Unknown Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Well Destruction Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Response Requested - Reports 10/30/2007 10/28/2006 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Other Regulatory Actions 10/1 /2007 10/1 /2007 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services 8/21 /2003 11 /30/2006 DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1295 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Doc Link: Title Description Comments: DB WELL ABANDONMENT ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR OCTOBER 15-19, 2007. REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED BY 11/9/07. E-MAIL SENT TO RP ON 1/2/08 REGARDING THE SUBMITTAL DATE FOR THE WELL ABANDONMENT REPORT. Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Other Regulatory Actions 8/1 /2007 8/1 /2007 Closure/No Further Action Letter https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5949581 &temptable=ENFORCEMENT Response Requested - Reports 7/30/2007 7/6/2007 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Other Regulatory Actions 7/24/2007 7/24/2007 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other THE LAST GW MONITORING REPORT (MAY 2007) Action Type: Notices Action Date: 6/22/2007 Received Issue Date: 6/22/2007 Action: Notification - Preclosure Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5939054&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Notification Letter for Closure Proposal Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 6/5/2007 Received Issue Date: 6/5/2007 Action: Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 6/4/2007 Received Issue Date: 6/4/2007 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5973414&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board's Letter Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 5/14/2007 Received Issue Date: 5/14/2007 Action: File review erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1296 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports '5/14/2007 5/14/2007 Well Installation Report Well Installation Report - CONFIRMATION SOIL BORINGS, UST/PIPING REMOVAL FINDINGS, EXCAVATION FINDINGS, ETC. Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 4/30/2007 4/13/2007 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 1 ST QUARTER 2007 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Other Regulatory Actions 4/19/2007 4/19/2007 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Other Regulatory Actions 4/3/2007 4/3/2007 Staff Letter https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5944167&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Other Regulatory Actions 3/30/2007 3/30/2007 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other SOIL RESULTS DURING THE REMOVAL OF THE LISTS, PIPING, DISPENSERS, AND HYDRAULIC LIFT Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 3/12/2007 Received Issue Date: 3/12/2007 Action: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report - RESULTS FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE LISTS, PIPING, DISPENSERS, AND HYDRAULIC LIFT Action Type: Enforcement/Orders Action Date: 2/2/2007 Received Issue Date: 2/2/2007 Action: Verbal Enforcement Doc Link: Title Description Comments: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1297 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) SOIL RESULTS REGARDING THE STATION DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: SOIL RESULTS Response Requested - Reports 1 /31 /2007 1 /31 /2007 Remedial Progress Report Response Requested - Reports 1 /30/2007 1 /17/2007 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Other Regulatory Actions 1 /17/2007 1 /17/2007 Verbal Communication Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 1/15/2007 Received Issue Date: 1/15/2007 Action: Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: TANKS WERE PULLED LAST WEEK AND CURRENTLY CONDUCTING CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLING, ETC Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 1/9/2007 Received Issue Date: 1/9/2007 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https:Hgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5921789&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 1/4/2007 Received Issue Date: 1/4/2007 Action: Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: ALL WELLS WERE LOWERED IN PREPARATION OF SITE ACTIVITIES. TANK PULL SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY WITH SAFD Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Other Regulatory Actions 12/13/2006 12/13/2006 Verbal Communication erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1298 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 11/30/2006 11 /13/2006 Remedial Progress Report Other Regulatory Actions 11 /15/2006 11 /15/2006 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Other Regulatory Actions 10/17/2006 10/17/2006 Verbal Communication Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 8/23/2006 Received Issue Date: 8/23/2006 Action: Meeting Doc Link: Title Description Comments: MEETING W/CONOCOPHILLIPS PROJECT MANAGER Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Response Requested - Reports *8/7/2006 8/7/2006 Remedial Progress Report Other Regulatory Actions 8/4/2006 8/4/2006 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Response Requested - Reports 7/30/2006 7/19/2006 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Other Regulatory Actions 6/20/2006 6/20/2006 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1299 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title Description Comments: THE 9/05 ETHANOL LIKELY DUE TO LAB ERROR. SEE SUBSEQUENT TEST RESULTS AND TANK TEST RESULTS. Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Other Regulatory Actions 5/15/2006 5/15/2006 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Response Requested - Reports *5/8/2006 5/8/2006 Remedial Progress Report Response Requested - Reports 4/30/2006 4/25/2006 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Other Regulatory Actions 4/27/2006 4/27/2006 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Other Regulatory Actions 2/7/2006 2/7/2006 File review Response Requested - Reports *2/3/2006 2/3/2006 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Response Requested - Reports *2/3/2006 2/3/2006 Remedial Progress Report Other Regulatory Actions 11 /15/2005 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1300 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: 11/15/2005 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_ id=5916758&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 11/8/2005 Received Issue Date: 11 /8/2005 Action: ' Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Enforcement - Other Action Date: 10/31/2005 Received Issue Date: 10/31/2005 Action: ' No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 10/21/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - THIRD QUARTER 2005 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Response Requested - Reports *10/13/2005 10/13/2005 Soil and Water Investigation Report Other Regulatory Actions 9/12/2005 9/12/2005 Staff Letter https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5910672&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 7/21/2005 Action: Remedial Progress Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report - SVE REPORT-2ND QUARTER 2005 Action Type: Response Requested - Other Action Date: 7/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 7/21/2005 Action: Other Report / Document erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1301 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Technical Report - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT -SECOND QUARTER 2005 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 7/30/2005 Received Issue Date: 7/18/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 2ND QUARTER 2005 GW MONT. REPORT Action Type: Enforcement - Other Action Date: 7/27/2005 Received Issue Date: 7/27/2005 Action: No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Other Regulatory Actions 5/5/2005 5/5/2005 Verbal Communication Other Regulatory Actions 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 Verbal Communication Response Requested - Reports 5/2/2005 5/2/2005 Remedial Progress Report Response Requested - Reports 4/30/2005 4/14/2005 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Enforcement - Other 4/18/2005 4/18/2005 " No Action Enforcement - Other 2/2/2005 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1302 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter 2/2/2005 " No Action Response Requested - Reports 1 /30/2005 1 /24/2005 Remedial Progress Report Other Regulatory Actions 1 /13/2005 1 /13/2005 Staff Letter Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans Action Date: 12/22/2004 Received Issue Date: 12/17/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Enforcement - Other 11/30/2004 11/30/2004 No Action Response Requested - Reports 11/30/2004 11/18/2004 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Response Requested - Reports 10/30/2004 10/22/2004 Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 10/27/2004 Received Issue Date: 10/27/2004 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5896354&temptable=ENFORCEMENT erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1303 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Enforcement - Other 10/26/2004 10/26/2004 No Action Enforcement - Other 10/21 /2004 10/21 /2004 No Action Response Requested - Reports 9/30/2004 9/17/2004 Soil and Water Investigation Report Response Requested - Reports 9/16/2004 9/16/2004 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Enforcement - Other 8/31 /2004 8/31 /2004 No Action Response Requested - Reports *8/10/2004 8/10/2004 Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 5/27/2004 Received Issue Date: 5/27/2004 Action: ' Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: GRANTED APPROVAL FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION DUE TO DRILL RIG SCHEDULE Action Type: Action Date: Enforcement - Other 5/10/2004 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1304 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: 5/10/2004 Action: No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 5/7/2004 Received Issue Date: 5/7/2004 Action: " Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: VOICE MAIL MESSAGES WITH CONSULANT RE. THE LOCATION OF THE ADDITIONAL WELL Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 4/30/2004 Received Issue Date: 4/30/2004 Action: Remedial Progress Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report - FIRST QUARTER 2004 STATUS REPORT AND THE FIRST QUARTER 2004 VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM O&M REPORT Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 4/5/2004 Received Issue Date: 4/5/2004 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5895430&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter - Dated April 5, 2004 Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans Action Date: 3/30/2004 Received Issue Date: 3/8/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Response Requested - Reports 2/27/2004 2/25/2004 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Enforcement - Other 2/5/2004 2/5/2004 . No Action Response Requested - Reports 2/2/2004 2/2/2004 Monitoring Report - Quarterly erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1305 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - 4TH QUARTER STATUS REPORT Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 2/2/2004 2/2/2004 Remedial Progress Report Remedial Progress Report - 4TH QUARTER 2003 VIES O/M REPORT Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 1 /30/2004 1 /12/2004 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Enforcement - Other 1 /22/2004 1 /22/2004 * No Action Other Regulatory Actions 12/12/2003 12/12/2003 Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling ALSO, MEETING AT THE SAFD OFFICE WITH RP, ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS, THEIR ATTORNEY, SAFD, & RB STAFF. Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Other Regulatory Actions 12/4/2003 12/4/2003 " Verbal Communication E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE CALLS FROM OR TO SWRCB, ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER, TOSCO, & SANTA ANA FIRE DEPARTMENT RE. 12/12/03 MEETING WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Other Regulatory Actions 12/2/2003 12/2/2003 Verbal Communication CALLS TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER (VOICE MAIL), SANTA ANA FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND TOSCO TO CONFIRM 12/12/03 MEETING WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans Action Date: 11/28/2003 Received Issue Date: 11 /14/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1306 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 11/25/2003 Received Issue Date: 11 /25/2003 Action: Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: PHONE CALLS TO SAFD AND UNOCAL (3) REGARDING THE NEED TO SET UP MEETING WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER Action Type: Response Requested - Other Action Date: 10/31/2003 Received Issue Date: 10/31/2003 Action: Other Report / Document Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Technical Report - CONFIRMATION REGARDING THE CHANGE IN THE GRADIENT FLOW DIRECTION Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2003 Received Issue Date: 10/20/2003 Action: Remedial Progress Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report - VES REPORT - 3RD QUARTER 2003 Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2003 Received Issue Date: 10/20/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT -2ND QUARTER 2003 Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Enforcement - Other 10/23/2003 10/23/2003 " No Action Other Regulatory Actions 10/10/2003 10/10/2003 Staff Letter https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_ id=5885725&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Enforcement - Other 10/8/2003 10/8/2003 No Action erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1307 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Investigation Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Response Requested - Reports 9/30/2003 9/25/2003 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Response Requested - Reports *9/25/2003 9/25/2003 Soil and Water Investigation Report Response Requested - Reports 7/30/2003 7/14/2003 Soil and Water Investigation Report Response Requested - Reports 7/30/2003 7/2/2003 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Enforcement - Other 7/16/2003 7/16/2003 . No Action Enforcement - Other 7/3/2003 7/3/2003 . No Action Other Regulatory Actions 5/22/2003 5/22/2003 Staff Letter https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5874728&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Enforcement - Other DB Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action Date: 5/22/2003 Received Issue Date: 5/22/2003 Action: No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans Action Date: 5/15/2003 Received Issue Date: 5/2/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Action Type: Response Requested - Other Action Date: 4/30/2003 Received Issue Date: 4/17/2003 Action: Other Report / Document Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Other Type of Submission by RP - REVIEWED THE QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Remedial Progress Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED QUARTERLY REPORT Response Requested - Reports 4/30/2003 4/2/2003 Remedial Progress Report Enforcement - Other 4/22/2003 4/22/2003 * No Action Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 4/18/2003 Received Issue Date: 4/18/2003 Action: " Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: RP STATED THAT THEY HAD PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH CONTRACTOR. THEY SECURED VES EQUIPMENT, RECIEVED PLAN CHECK APPROVAL FROM CITY. THE SYSTEM SHOULD START UP WITHIN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS. Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 4/15/2003 Received Issue Date: 4/15/2003 Action: ' Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: APPROVED THAT MAPS/CROSS SECTIONS COULD BE INCLUDED WITH WORK PLAN DUE ON 4/29/03 Action Type: Action Date: Enforcement - Other 4/8/2003 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1309 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: 4/8/2003 Action: " No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED REMEDIATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION STATUS REPORT Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: RB BOARD LETTER Response Requested - Reports 3/30/2003 3/20/2003 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Other Regulatory Actions 3/18/2003 3/18/2003 Staff Letter https:Hgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5881842&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 3/18/2003 Received Issue Date: 3/18/2003 Action: File review Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED S.A. REPORT, DRAFTED/FINALIZED LETTER, & UPDATED GEOTRACKER Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 1/30/2003 Received Issue Date: 1/30/2003 Action: File review Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED 4TH QR & UPDATED GEOTRACKER Action Type: Enforcement - Other Action Date: 1/30/2003 Received Issue Date: 1/30/2003 Action: No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED 4TH QUARTER 2002 MONT. REPORT Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Response Requested - Reports 1/30/2003 1 /15/2003 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Other Regulatory Actions 1 /10/2003 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1310 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: 1/10/2003 Action: Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: APPROVED TWO ADDITIONAL WELLS Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 12/18/2002 Received Issue Date: 12/18/2002 Action: File review Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED 3RD QR & UPDATED GEOTRACKER Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 12/17/2002 Received Issue Date: 12/17/2002 Action: ' Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: CALL WITH THE CONSULTANT REGARDING SITE STATUS AND REVIEWED THE 3RD QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 12/5/2002 Received Issue Date: 12/5/2002 Action: File review Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED CAP, SENT LETTER, AND UPDATED GEOTRACKER Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 12/5/2002 Received Issue Date: 12/5/2002 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5882655&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: REVIEWED CAP Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: *11/15/2002 Received Issue Date: 11 /14/2002 Action: CAP/RAP - Other Report Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Corrective Action Report - APPROVED CAP W/CONDITIONS Action Type: Response Requested - Reports Action Date: 10/30/2002 Received Issue Date: 10/11/2002 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 9/10/2002 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1311 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Received Issue Date: 9/10/2002 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_ id=5882604&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: REVIEWED 8/21/02 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION PILOT TEST REPORT Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 9/4/2002 Received Issue Date: 9/4/2002 Action: File review Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED VIES PILOT TEST REPORT, DRAFT/FINAL LETTER & GEOTRACKER Action Type: Enforcement - Other Action Date: 9/4/2002 Received Issue Date: 9/4/2002 Action: ' No Action Doc Link: Title Description Comments: REVIEWED THE VES PILOT STUDY REPORT Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study Report Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Action Type: Action Date: Received Issue Date: Action: Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Response Requested - Reports 8/30/2002 8/22/2002 CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study Report Response Requested - Reports 7/30/2002 7/3/2002 Monitoring Report - Quarterly Enforcement - Other 7/10/2002 7/10/2002 No Action Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 5/22/2002 Received Issue Date: 5/22/2002 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6282151 &temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 3/21/2002 Received Issue Date: 3/21/2002 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1312 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Action: ' Verbal Communication Doc Link: Title Description Comments: CALL FROM CONOCOPHILLIPS REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE REMEDIATION SYSTEM. Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 1/11/2002 Received Issue Date: 1/11/2002 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6282150&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 12/16/2001 Received Issue Date: 12/16/2001 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6279273&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 7/19/2001 Received Issue Date: 7/19/2001 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6279275&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 4/13/2000 Received Issue Date: 4/13/2000 Action: Staff Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6279887&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Regional Board Letter Action Type: Cleanup Action Action Date: 8/21/2003 Received Issue Date: Action: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 2/5/1997 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 2/4/1997 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Discovery erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1313 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 2/4/1997 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Stopped Doc Link: Title Description Comments: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Site Maps (as of May 29, 2021) Title: GEO BORE (CB-3) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/8351331949/TO605902028.pdf Size : 151 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 5/14/2007' Title: GEO BORE (CB-6) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/7166951060/TO605902028.pdf Size : 152 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 5/14/2007' Title: GEO BORE (CB-4) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/1768145501 /TO605902028.pdf Size : 174 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 5/14/2007' Title: GEO BORE (CB-1) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/6430862247/TO605902028.pdf Size : 218 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 5/14/2007' Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/1285140812/TO605902028.pdf Size : 76 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 5/14/2007' Title: GEO BORE (CB-5) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/5249836802/TO605902028.pdf Size : 197 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 5/14/2007' Title: GEO BORE (CB-2) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/7050687491 /TO605902028.pdf Size : 163 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 5/14/2007' Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/4635970890/TO605902028.pdf Size : 252 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 5/14/2007' Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/4753996133/TO605902028.pdf Size : 75 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 3/12/2007' erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1314 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/6045246958/TO605902028.pdf Size : 243 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 3/12/2007" Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/9207676529/TO605902028.pdf Size : 324 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 12/19/2006` Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/1226422965/TO605902028.pdf Size : 65 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 12/19/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-20) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/2312010049/TO605902028.pdf Size : 45 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-22) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/3747608780/TO605902028.pdf Size : 145 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-23) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/9521179020/TO605902028.pdf Size : 86 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006" Title: GEO_BORE (B-17) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/3265563786/TO605902028.pdf Size : 11 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-15) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/7970243692/TO605902028.pdf Size : 70 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-19) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/7163393914/TO605902028.pdf Size : 45 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006" Title: GEO_BORE (B-10) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/1860979974/TO605902028.pdf Size : 73 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-21) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/1975514054/TO605902028.pdf Size : 146 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-11) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/7175245523/TO605902028.pdf Size : 68 KB erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1315 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Submitted By: Submitted: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) 11/15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-16) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/1305758416/TO605902028.pdf Size : 70 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-18) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/7897596061 /TO605902028.pdf Size : 44 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-12) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/3409777581 /TO605902028.pdf Size : 124 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (B-13) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/9881590127/TO605902028.pdf Size : 77 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO_BORE (614) Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_bore/9748870670/TO605902028.pdf Size : 70 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /15/2006` Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/3972867667/TO605902028.pdf Size : 124 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 8/4/2005 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/7775510489/TO605902028.pdf Size : 29 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 7/28/2004 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/8993070304/TO605902028.PDF Size : 29 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 11 /4/2003 Title: GEO MAP Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_map/8440320670/TO605902028.pdf Size : 311 KB Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Submitted: 8/27/2002 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of May 29, 2021) Document Type: Site Documents Size : 4,953 KB Document Date: 1/8/2008" Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS -OTHER Submitted: Title: WELL DESTRUCTION AND REMEDIATION SYSTEM PIPING REMOVAL REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5508619546/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Document Date: 11 /13/2007 Type: LETTER Size : 376 KB Submitted By: (REGULATOR) Submitted: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1316 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: UNOCAL-76 STATION #4991 1601 E. 1 ST STREET_SANTA ANA_NOM_CASE CLOSURE Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/site_documents/3704055607/Unocal%2D76%20Station%20%234991 % 5F1 601%20E%2E%201 st%20Street%5FSanta%2OAna%5FNOM%5FCase%20CIosure%2Epdf Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 8/1/2007 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: UNKNOWN Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5949581 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,157 KB Document Date: 7/27/2007 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: 2Q07 QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6682096183/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 5,398 KB Document Date: 7/26/2007 Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 2ND Q, 2007, GMR Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8901746988/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 6/22/2007 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: NOTIFICATION - PRECLOSURE Submitted: Title: NOTIFICATION LETTER FOR CLOSURE PROPOSAL Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5939054 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 6/4/2007 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD'S LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5973414 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 5,907 KB Document Date: 5/14/2007* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - INVESTIGATION RPT. Submitted: Title: CONFIRMATION SOIL BORING ASSESSMENT PART 1 OF 4 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4649037003/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 5,703 KB Document Date: 5/14/2007* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - INVESTIGATION RPT. Submitted: Title: CONF SOIL BORING ASSESSMENT PART 3 OF 4 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2198933482/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 3,488 KB Document Date: 5/14/2007* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - INVESTIGATION RPT. Submitted: Title: CONF SOIL BORING ASSESS PART 4 OF 4 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3861727654/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 4,344 KB Document Date: 5/14/2007* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - INVESTIGATION RPT. Submitted: Title: CONF SOIL BORING ASSESS PT 2 OF 4 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3038700938/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 366 KB Document Date: 5/1/2007* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: 1Q07 QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1304783701/T0605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 4/3/2007 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5944167 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1317 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Document Type: Site Documents Size : 8,606 KB Document Date: 3/12/2007* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - CLOSURE RPT. Submitted: Title: UST CLOSURE AND SITE DEMO REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5294483780/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 266 KB Document Date: 2/8/2007* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE -ENFORCEMENT Submitted: RELATED Title: SUBMITTAL OF RULE 1166 SOIL MON RECORDS Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6599149405/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 679 KB Document Date: 1/29/2007* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: 4Q06 QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6650863468/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 5,031 KB Document Date: 1/26/2007* Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 4TH Q, 2006, GMR Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4083418130/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 1/9/2007 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforeement_id=5921789 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 5,034 KB Document Date: 12/28/2006* Submitted By: ES ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: FOURTH QTR.2006 O&M REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4178684830/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,746 KB Document Date: 12/19/2006* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: WORKPLANS - INVESTIGATION WP Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN FOR WELL ABANDONMENT & CONF SOIL BORINGS Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4182569205/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 7,381 KB Document Date: 11/2/2006* Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 3RD Q, 2006, GMR, PART 1 OF 2 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1113538980/T0605902028.PDF DB Document Type: Site Documents Size : 606 KB Document Date: 11/1/2006* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: 3Q06 QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5125196695/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 10,100 KB Document Date: 10/30/2006* Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 3RD Q, 2006, GMR, PART 2 OF 2 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3527921915/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 2,251 KB Document Date: 9/22/2006* Submitted By: ES ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: THIRD QTR.2006 O&M REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3056274235/TO605902028.PDF erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1318 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Document Type: Site Documents Size : 583 KB Document Date: 8/7/2006* Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: 2Q06 QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9473388493/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,497 KB Document Date: 7/20/2006 Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 2ND Q, 2006, GMR Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6414794743/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 2,925 KB Document Date: 7/5/2006 Submitted By: ES ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: SECOND QTR. 2006 O&M REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7654052555/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 566 KB Document Date: 5/5/2006 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: 1Q06 QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8395276725/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,323 KB Document Date: 4/28/2006 Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 1 ST Q, 2006, GMR Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7277418375/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,908 KB Document Date: 3/21/2006 Submitted By: ES ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT Submitted: Title: FIRST QUARTER 2006 O&M REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7533673942/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,229 KB Document Date: 2/8/2006 Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 4TH Q, 2005, GMR Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8582044839/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 94 KB Document Date: 2/2/2006 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT - FOURTH QUARTER 2005 (2/2/2006) Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4565855264/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 8,443 KB Document Date: 12/28/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - INVESTIGATION RPT. Submitted: Title: ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT (10-11-05) Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6093503654/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 58 KB Document Date: 12/28/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - INVESTIGATION RPT. Submitted: Title: WORK PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER ASSESS (1-13-05) Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9280774i72/T0605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 363 KB Document Date: 12/28/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 3RD QTR QSR 3Q05 (10-27-05) Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5743314445/TO605902028.PDF erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1319 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Document Type: Site Documents Size : 2,416 KB Document Date: 12/28/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS - REMEDIAL ACTION RPT. Submitted: Title: VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM O&M REPORT (6-13-05) Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3866712272/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 11/15/2005 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5916758 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 8,443 KB Document Date: 11/15/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 10.11.05 ADD'L GW ASSESSMENT REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2103681802/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 363 KB Document Date: 11/11/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 10.27.05 QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT 3Q2005 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9176228165/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 4,180 KB Document Date: 11/1/2005 Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 3RD Q, 2005, GMR Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7538755118/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 9/12/2005 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5910672 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 2,416 KB Document Date: 8/18/2005 Submitted By: ES ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 2ND QTR'05 VPR EXTRTN O&M RPT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2210385978/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,227 KB Document Date: 8/15/2005 Submitted By: ES ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 1STQTR.'05 VAP.EX.SYS.O&M RPT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2005353629/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,698 KB Document Date: 8/8/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT -FOURTH QUARTER 2004 #4991 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6551221549/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,510 KB Document Date: 8/8/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT -FIRST QUARTER 2005 #4991 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6920362174/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 3,435 KB Document Date: 8/4/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT -SECOND QUARTER 2005 #4991 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5523038566/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 3,435 KB erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1320 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Document Date: 8/4/2005 Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION, 2ND Q, 2005 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1206235587/T0605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 2,576 KB Document Date: 7/25/2005 Submitted By: ASTRED RAMIREZ (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT -SECOND QUARTER 2005 #4991 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7308591544/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 2,416 KB Document Date: 6/23/2005 Submitted By: ES ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC (CONTRACTOR) Type: REPORTS -OTHER Submitted: Title: 2NDQTR'05VPREXTRTNO&MRPT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9193923771/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 3,592 KB Document Date: 5/2/2005 Submitted By: TRC IRVINE (CONTRACTOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted: Title: 76 STATION. 1 ST Q, 2005 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4434568107/TO605902028.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 10/27/2004 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5896354 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 4/5/2004 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER - DATED APRIL 5, 2004 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5895430 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 10/10/2003 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5885725 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 5/22/2003 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5874728 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 3/18/2003 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: RB BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5881842 DB Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 12/5/2002 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REVIEWED CAP Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5882655 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 9/10/2002 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REVIEWED 8/21/02 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION PILOT TEST REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=5882604 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 5/22/2002 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1321 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6282151 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 1/11/2002 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6282150 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 12/16/2001 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6279273 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 7/19/2001 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6279275 Document Type: Site Documents Size : Document Date: 4/13/2000 Submitted By: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted: Title: REGIONAL BOARD LETTER Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605902028&enforcement_id=6279887 50 1 of 2 E 0.451 151.221 MOBIL #18-LW8 LUST 2,374.91 7 17241 I R VI NE TUSTIN CA 92680 Global ID: T0605901789 County: ORANGE Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 33.748532 Status Date: 4/1/1996 Longitude:-117.831163 Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Project Search Results Export; LUST Cleanup Sites & Military UST Site from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail RB Case No: 083002544T Potential COC: Gasoline Local Case No: 94UT042 How Discovered: Tank Closure Begin Date: 8/3/1994 Stop Method: Close and Remove Tank Lead Agency. ORANGE COUNTY LOP Stop Description: Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker. SR CUF Case: NO File Location: Local Agency Potential Media of Concern: Soil How Discovered Description: Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Disadvantaged Community: Calenviroscreen Score: 61-65% Site History: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 4/1 /1996 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 1 /10/1995 Action: Excavation Action Type: Other erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1322 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Date : 8/3/1994 Action: Leak Discovery Action Type: Other Date : 8/3/1994 Action: Leak Reported LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120 Contact Name: SITYAMALA RAJAGOPAL Email: srajagopal@ochca.com City: SANTA ANA Phone No: 7144336262 Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 Contact Name: ROSE SCOTT Email: rose.scott@waterboards.ca.gov City: RIVERSIDE Phone No: 9513206375 Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 4/1/1996 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 8/3/1994 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Reaulatory Profile DB Site Facility Name: MOBIL #18-LW8 Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type: Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method: Project Status: Address: 17241 IRVINE WDR Place Type: City: TUSTIN WDR File: Zip: 92680 WDR Order: County: ORANGE CUF Priority Assig: CUF Claim: CUF Amount Paid: File Location: LOCAL AGENCY Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, 8 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Project Oversight Agencies: Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0605901789 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 4/1/1996 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_ report_include?global_id=T0605901789&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: SOIL User Defined Beneficial Use: DWR GW Sub Basin: Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-001) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) Post Closure Site Management: Future Land Use: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: ORANGE COUNTY LOP (LEAD) - CASE #: 94UT042 CASEWORKER: SITYAMALA RAJAGOPAL SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) - CASE #: 083002544T CASEWORKER: ROSE SCOTT Gndwater Monitoring Freque: Designated Beneficial Use Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply, 8 - Note: Desc: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61 - Note: Also incl parts of 801.13, 801.14, 845.61, 845.63. Site History: No site history available LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1323 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Status: Completed - Case Closed Date: 4/1 /1996 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Date: 8/3/1994 LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Action Report (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: EXCAVATION Begin Date: 1/10/1995 Phase: End Date: 11/21/1995 Contaminant Mass Removed. Description: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of May 29, 2021) Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions Action Date: 4/1/1996 Received Issue Date: 4/1/1996 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_ documents? global_id=T0605901789&enforcement_id=5984232&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments: Remedial Action Completion Certification and Case Closure Summary Action Type: Cleanup Action Action Date: 1/10/1995 Received Issue Date: Action: Excavation Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 8/3/1994 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Discovery Doc Link: Title Description Comments: Action Type: Leak Action Action Date: 8/3/1994 Received Issue Date: Action: Leak Reported Doc Link: Title Description Comments: LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of May 29, 2021) Document Type: Site Documents Size Document Date: 4/1/1996 Submitted By: ANTHONY MARTINEZ (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted: Title: REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION AND CASE CLOSURE SUMMARY Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0605901789&enforcement_id=5984232 DB 50 2 of 2 E 0.451 151.221 MOBIL #18-LW8 2,374.91 7 17241 IRVINE BLVD LOP ORANGE TUSTIN CA 92680 Record ID: R00001993 Case Closed Date: 4/1/1996 Case ID: 94UT042 Type of Closure: Closure certification issued Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1324 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) 51 1 of 1 NNW 0.451 165.761 VICTORIA RUTLEDGE RCRA TSD 2,392.12 22 1345 N CABRILLO PARK DR F-5 SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAC003013492 Gen Status Universe: No Report Contact Name: SANTA ANA Contact Address: 1345 N CABRILLO PARK DR F-5 , , SANTA ANA, CA, 92701 , Contact Phone No and Ext. 949-716-3998 Contact Email: KRISTEN@DRYMASTER.COM Contact Country: Land Type: County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Receive Date: 20190503 Location Latitude: 33.757227 Location Longitude: -117.841611 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: NO RECORDS: As of Aug 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility. No Onsite Burner Exemption: No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner: No Used Oil Burner. No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer. No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 20190503 Handler Name: VICTORIA RUTLEDGE Federal Waste Generator Code: N Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Other Street 1: 1345 N CABRILLO PARK DR F-5 Name: SANTA ANA Street 2: Date Became Current: City. SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 949-716-3998 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1325 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Records (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site DB (ft) Type: Other Street 1: 1345 N CABRILLO PARK DR F-5 Name: VICTORIA RUTLEDGE Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 949-716-3998 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92701 52 1 of 1 SE 0.471 136.571 PFAS GW 2,496.67 -8 CA Well ID: 3010046-032 Latitude: 33.743708 Longitude: -117.832856 Data Source(s): Perfluorooctanoic Acid; 4,8-Dioxa-3H-perfluorononanoic acid; Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid; Perfluorododecanoic acid; Perfluorohexanoic acid; Perfluoroheptanoic acid; Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid; Perfluorononanoic acid; Perfluorooctadecanoic acid; Perfluorotetradecanoic acid; Perfluorotridecanoic acid; Perfluoroundecanoic acid Perfluorooctanoic Acid Chemical: PFOA RL: UNK Results: 8.8 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorooctanoic Acid Chemical: PFOA RL: UNK Results: 14.1 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): 4.8-Dioxa-3H-verfluorononanoic acid Chemical: ADONA RL: UNK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): 4.8-Dioxa-3H-perfluorononanoic acid Chemical: ADONA RL: UNK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid Chemical: PFBSA RL: UNK Results: 5 Top of Screen (ft): 441 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1326 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Date : 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid Chemical: PFBSA RL: LINK Results: 8 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date : 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorododecanoic acid Chemical: PFDOA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorododecanoic acid Chemical: PFDOA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorohexanoic acid Chemical: PFHA RL: LINK Results: 5.6 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date : 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorohexanoic acid Chemical: PFHA RL: LINK Results: 9 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluoroheptanoic acid Chemical: PFHPA RL: LINK Results: 5.1 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date : 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1327 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluoroheptanoic acid Chemical: PFHPA RL: LINK Results: 2.8 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid Chemical: PFHXSA RL: UNK Results: 8 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid Chemical: PFHXSA RL: LINK Results: 13.1 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorononanoic acid Chemical: PFNA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorononanoic acid Chemical: PFNA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorooctadecanoic acid Chemical: PFNDCA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1328 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Well Depth (ft): Perfluorooctadecanoic acid Chemical: PFNDCA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorotetradecanoic acid Chemical: PFTEDA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorotetradecanoic acid Chemical: PFTEDA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorotridecanoic acid Chemical: P FTRI DA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date : 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluorotridecanoic acid Chemical: PFTRI DA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date : 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): Perfluoroundecanoic acid Chemical: PFUNDCA RL: LINK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date : 03/30/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1329 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Perfluoroundecanoic acid Chemical: PFUNDCA RL: UNK Results: 2 Top of Screen (ft): 441 Date: 02/12/2020 Screen Length (ft): 464 Units: NG/L Source: DHS Qualifer: < Source Name: 3010046-032 Well Type: MUNICIPAL Other Names: PASADENA WELL Well Depth (ft): 53 1 of 4 SW 0.501 127.711 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NO. 5 Z650.75 -16 FIRST STREET/TOWNSEND STREET SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID: 30590003 Permit Renewal Lead: Site Code: 404320 Project Manager: Nat Priority List: NO Supervisor. TRISS CHESNEY Acres: 6 ACRES Public Partici Spclst: Special Program: Census Tract: 6059074406 Funding: SCHOOL DISTRICT County: ORANGE Assembly District. 69 Latitude: 33.743323891627 Senate District. 34 Longitude:-117.84678003091 School District: SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT APN: NONE SPECIFIED Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY Site Type: SCHOOL Office: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH Past Use that Caused Contam: RETIAL - MISC. Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED SITE HISTORY: DB SCH The approximate 6-acre site consists of three parcels, occupied by commercial structures. Surrounding properties consist of commercial and residential properties, a golf course, several schools and parks. Portions of the site have been historically occupied by commercial structures, including a gasoline station and a dry cleaner, as well as previously utilized for agricultural purposes. Project dropped by district. Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Program Type: SCHOOL INVESTIGATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30590003 Completed Activities Title: Environmental Oversight Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30590003&enforcement_id=6003275 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Date Completed: 7/23/2002 Comments: Title: Inactive Status of Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30590003&enforcement_id=60330233 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Inactive Status Letter erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1330 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Date Completed: 7/14/2003 Comments: DTSC issued an inactive status letter on November 4, 2002 indicating DTSC woul close out the project if a revised schedule for furture activities was not received. DTSC received verbal notification in March 2003, from the Santa Ana Unified School District that the project would likely not be active until September or October 2003. Title: . Site Visit - Site Inspections/visit Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed: 3/27/2002 Comments: Title: " Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: " Workplan Date Completed: 8/14/2002 Comments: 53 2 of 4 SW 0.501 127.71 / REMINGTON ELEMENTARY 2,650.75 -16 REDEVELOPMENT 1325 EAST FOURTH STREET SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID: 30820004 Permit Renewal Lead: Site Code: 404321 Project Manager: Nat Priority List: NO Supervisor. TRISS CHESNEY Acres: 4 ACRES Public Partici Spclst: Special Program: Census Tract: 6059074406 Funding: SCHOOL DISTRICT County: ORANGE Assembly District: 69 Latitude: 33.743323891627 Senate District. 34 Longitude: -117.84678003091 School District: SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT APN: NONE SPECIFIED Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY Site Type: SCHOOL Office: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH Past Use that Caused Contam: EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED SITE HISTORY: SCH The square shaped site is approximately 4-acres, occupied by portable classroom buildings, playground areas, and three permanent structures. Surrounding properties consist of residential properties, a gasoline station, and other commercial structures. Portions of the site have been historically occupied by a school (since 1916) and utilized for agricultural purposes. An underground storage tank release impacted groundwater, reportedly 300 feet north of the site. Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Program Type: SCHOOL INVESTIGATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30820004 Completed Activities Title: Inactive Letter Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30820004&enforcement_id=6008370 Area Name: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1331 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Inactive Status Letter Date Completed: 7/14/2003 Comments: DTSC issued an inactive status letter on November 4, 2002 indicating DTSC woul close out the project if a revised schedule for furture activities was not received. DTSC received verbal notification in March 2003, from the Santa Ana Unified School District that the project would likely not be active until September or October 2003. Title: Environmental Oversight Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30820004&enforcement_id=6003363 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Date Completed: 7/23/2002 Comments: Title: ' Site Visit - Site Inspections/visit Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed: 3/27/2002 Comments: Title: PEA Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Workplan Date Completed: 9/1/2002 Comments: approved wp 53 3 of 4 Estor/EPA ID: Site Code: Nat Priority List: APN: Census Tract: Site Type: Address Description: Office: SW 0.501 2,650.75 30590003 404320 NO NONE SPECIFIED 6059074406 SCHOOL FIRST STREET/TOWNSEND STREET SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH 127.71 / ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NO. 5 -16 FIRST STREET/TOWNSEND STREET SANTA ANA CA 92701 Assembly District: Senate District: Permit Renewal Lead: Public Partici Spclst: Project Manager: County: Latitude: Longitude: Special Program: Acres: Funding: SCHOOL DISTRICT Supervisor. Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Past Use that Caused Contam: RETIAL - MISC. Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History: 69 34 ORANGE 33.743323891627 -117.84678003091 6 ACRES " TRISS CHESNEY ENVIROSTOR The approximate 6-acre site consists of three parcels, occupied by commercial structures. Surrounding properties consist of commercial and residential properties, a golf course, several schools and parks. Portions of the site have been historically occupied by commercial structures, including a gasoline station and a dry cleaner, as well as previously utilized for aqricultural purposes. Project dropped by district. City Council 18 — 1332 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Program Type: SCHOOL INVESTIGATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30590003 Completed Activities Title: Environmental Oversight Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30590003&enforcement_id=6003275 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Date Completed: 7/23/2002 Comments: DB Title: Inactive Status of Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30590003&enforcement id=60330233 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Inactive Status Letter Date Completed: 7/14/2003 Comments: DTSC issued an inactive status letter on November 4, 2002 indicating DTSC woul close out the project if a revised schedule for furture activities was not received. DTSC received verbal notification in March 2003, from the Santa Ana Unified School District that the project would likely not be active until September or October 2003. Title: * Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: " Workplan Date Completed: 8/14/2002 Comments: Title: ' Site Visit - Site Inspections/visit Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed: 3/27/2002 Comments: 53 4 of 4 Estor/EPA ID: Site Code: Nat Priority List: APN: Census Tract: Site Type: Address Description: Office: Special Program: Funding: SW 0.501 Z 650.75 30820004 404321 NO NONE SPECIFIED 6059074406 SCHOOL 1325 EAST FOURTH STREET SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH SCHOOL DISTRICT 127.711 REMINGTON ELEMENTARY -16 REDEVELOPMENT 1325 EAST FOURTH STREET SANTA ANA CA 92701 Assembly District: 69 Senate District: 34 Permit Renewal Lead: Public Partici Spclst: Project Manager: County: ORANGE Latitude: 33.743323891627 Longitude: -117.84678003091 Acres: 4 ACRES Supervisor. ' TRISS CHESNEY erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services ENVIROSTOR Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1333 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Cleanup Status: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 9/12/2005 DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES NONE SPECIFIED DB The square shaped site is approximately 4-acres, occupied by portable classroom buildings, playground areas, and three permanent structures. Surrounding properties consist of residential properties, a gasoline station, and other commercial structures. Portions of the site have been historically occupied by a school (since 1916) and utilized for agricultural purposes. An underground storage tank release impacted groundwater, reportedly 300 feet north of the site. Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Program Type: SCHOOL INVESTIGATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30820004 Completed Activities Title: Environmental Oversight Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30820004&enforcement_id=6003363 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Date Completed: 7/23/2002 Comments: Title: ' Site Visit - Site Inspections/visit Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed: 3/27/2002 Comments: Title: PEA Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Workplan Date Completed: 9/1/2002 Comments: approved wp Title: Inactive Letter Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30820004&enforcement_id=6008370 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Inactive Status Letter Date Completed: 7/14/2003 Comments: DTSC issued an inactive status letter on November 4, 2002 indicating DTSC woul close out the project if a revised schedule for furture activities was not received. DTSC received verbal notification in March 2003, from the Santa Ana Unified School District that the project would likely not be active until September or October 2003. 54 1 of 1 - SW 0.541 124.991 E. CHESTNUT SA PROPERTY ENVIROSTOR erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1334 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) 2,873.52 -19 1538 E. CHESTNUT AVE SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID: 60000732 Assembly District: Site Code: Senate District: Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074403 Project Manager. Site Type: EVALUATION County: ORANGE Address Description: 1538 E. CHESTNUT AVE Latitude: 33.7423908 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude:-117.8466818 Special Program: Acres: 0 ACRES Funding: NOT APPLICABLE Supervisor: Cleanup Status: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY AS OF 7/11/2007 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: ORANGE COUNTY - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History. Status: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY Program Type: EVALUATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 86-90% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60000732 DB Completed Activities Title: County of Orange SIB 1248 Notification Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000732&doc_id=60193101 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: SB 1248 Notification Date Completed: 5/11/2010 Comments: The County of Orange submitted a notification to DTSC of a Remedial Investigation/action oversight to be conducted at the subject property. 55 1 of 1 NNW 0.551 166.871 AZTEC CLEANERS ENVIROSTOR 2,906.76 23 1730 EAST 17TH STREET SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID: 30720014 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: Senate District: Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead. APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059075403 Project Manager: Site Type: EVALUATION County: ORANGE Address Description: 1730 EAST 17TH STREET Latitude: 33.7585056 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude:-117.8424015 Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: NOT APPLICABLE Supervisor. Cleanup Status: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY AS OF 4/30/2001 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1335 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Status: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY Program Type: EVALUATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 71-75% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30720014 Completed Activities Title: SB 1248 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30720014&doc_id=6019413 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: SB 1248 Notification Date Completed: 4/26/2001 Comments: SB 1248 Orange County 56 1 of 6 SW 0.621 126.091 EECO 3,275.59 -18 1441 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92701 EPA Handler ID: CAD008256349 Gen Status Universe: Small Quantity Generator Contact Name: Contact Address: US Contact Phone No and Ext. Contact Email: Contact Country: US County Name: ORANGE EPA Region: 09 Land Type: Receive Date: 19960901 Location Latitude: 33.742597 Location Longitude: -117.849106 Event/Area Details Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Event Code: CA150 Corrective Action Event Descri: INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN APPROVED Actual Date of Event: 20060517 Orig Sched Event Date: New Sched Event Date: Best Date: 20060517 Groundwater Release Indicator. Soil Release Indicator. Air Release Indicator: Surface Waste Release Ind: Event Responsible Agency: S Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Event Code: CA550RC Corrective Action Event Descri: REMEDY CONSTRUCTION -REMEDY CONSTRUCTED Actual Date of Event: 20100709 Orig Sched Event Date: 20100709 New Sched Event Date: Best Date: 20100709 Groundwater Release Indicator. Soil Release Indicator. Air Release Indicator. Surface Waste Release Ind: Event Responsible Agency: S Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Event Code: CA070YE erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services RCRA CORRACTS Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1336 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Corrective Action Event Descri: DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR AN INVESTIGATION -INVESTIGATION IS NECESSARY Actual Date of Event: 20000127 Orig Sched Event Date: 20000127 New Sched Event Date: Best Date: 20000127 Groundwater Release Indicator: Soil Release Indicator. Air Release Indicator: Surface Waste Release Ind: Event Responsible Agency: S Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Event Code: CA750YE Corrective Action Event Descri: RELEASE TO GW CONTROLLED DETERMINATION -YES, APPLICABLE AS OF THIS DATE Actual Date of Event: 20100709 Orig Sched Event Date: 20100709 New Sched Event Date: Best Date: 20100709 Groundwater Release Indicator: Soil Release Indicator: Air Release Indicator: Surface Waste Release Ind: Event Responsible Agency: S Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Event Code: CA725YE Corrective Action Event Descri: HUMAN EXPOSURES CONTROLLED DETERMINATION -YES, APPLICABLE AS OF THIS DATE Actual Date of Event: 20100708 Orig Sched Event Date: 20100708 New Sched Event Date: Best Date: 20100708 Groundwater Release Indicator: Soil Release Indicator. Air Release Indicator: Surface Waste Release Ind: Event Responsible Agency: S Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Event Code: CA050 Corrective Action Event Descri: RFA COMPLETED Actual Date of Event: 20000127 Orig Sched Event Date: 20000127 New Sched Event Date: Best Date: 20000127 Groundwater Release Indicator. Soil Release Indicator. Air Release Indicator: Surface Waste Release Ind: Event Responsible Agency: S DB Violation/Evaluation Summary Note: VIOLATION or UNDETERMINED: There are VIOLATION or UNDETERMINED details or records associated with this facility (EPA ID) in the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement table dated Aug, 2021. Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: F - 262.50-60 Violation Short Description: Generators - General Violation Type: 262.A Violation Determined Date: 19920903 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19921012 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19921009 Violation Responsible Agency: State erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1337 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 210 Enforcement Type Description: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement Action Date: 19920903 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency. State Proposed Penalty Amount: 1800 Final Amount: 1200 Paid Amount: Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: F - 261.5 Violation Short Description: Generators - General Violation Type: 262.A Violation Determined Date: 19920903 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19921002 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19921009 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 210 Enforcement Type Description: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement Action Date: 19920903 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: 1800 Final Amount: 1200 Paid Amount: Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: F - 262.40-43.D Violation Short Description: Generators - General Violation Type: 262.A Violation Determined Date: 19920902 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19921002 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19921009 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 210 Enforcement Type Description: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement Action Date: 19920902 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: 1800 Final Amount: 1200 Paid Amount: Violation Details erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1338 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Found Violation: Yes Citation: FIR - 270 Violation Short Description: TSD - General Violation Type: 264.A Violation Determined Date: 19890214 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19890501 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19890516 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 310 Enforcement Type Description: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement Action Date: 19890308 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency. State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19890331 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: FIR - 268 ALL Violation Short Description: LDR - General Violation Type: 268.A Violation Determined Date: 19890214 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19890501 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19890516 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 310 Enforcement Type Description: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement Action Date: 19890308 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19890331 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1339 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: FR - 268.7 Violation Short Description: LDR - General Violation Type: 268.A Violation Determined Date: 19890214 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19890501 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19890516 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 310 Enforcement Type Description: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement Action Date: 19890308 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19890331 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: F - 264.140-150.H Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Violation Type: 264.H Violation Determined Date: 19890208 Scheduled Compliance Date: Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19890619 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 310 Enforcement Type Description: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement Action Date: 19890308 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: FIR - 270 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1340 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Violation Short Description: TSD - General Violation Type: 264.A Violation Determined Date: 19871110 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19880122 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19880809 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19871110 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19881229 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency. State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: FIR - 264.110-120.G Violation Short Description: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure Violation Type: 264.G Violation Determined Date: 19871110 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19880122 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19880809 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19881229 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19871110 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1341 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: F - 264.140-150.H Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Violation Type: 264.H Violation Determined Date: 19871110 Scheduled Compliance Date: 19880626 Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19880809 Violation Responsible Agency: State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19880323 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Enforcement Type: 120 Enforcement Type Description: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement Action Date: 19880526 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency: State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: F - 268 ALL Violation Short Description: LDR - General Violation Type: 268.A Violation Determined Date: 19871110 Scheduled Compliance Date: Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19880809 Violation Responsible Agency: State Violation Details Found Violation: Yes Citation: F - 268.7 Violation Short Description: LDR - General Violation Type: 268.A Violation Determined Date: 19871110 Scheduled Compliance Date: Return to Compliance: Observed Actual Return to Compl: 19880809 Violation Responsible Agency: State Evaluation Details Evaluation Start Date: 19920917 Evaluation Type Description: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1342 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19920723 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: Generators - General Return to Compliance Date: 19921009 Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19890214 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: LDR - General Return to Compliance Date: 19890516 Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19890214 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - General Return to Compliance Date: 19890516 Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19890208 Evaluation Type Description: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Return to Compliance Date: 19890619 Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19871110 Evaluation Type Description: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Return to Compliance Date: 19880809 Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19871110 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: LDR - General Return to Compliance Date: 19880809 Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19871110 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - General Return to Compliance Date: 19880809 Evaluation Agency: State Evaluation Start Date: 19871110 Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure Return to Compliance Date: 19880809 Evaluation Agency: State Handler Summa Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator. No Transporter Activity: No Transfer Facility: No Onsite Burner. No Smelting, Melting and Refining: No Underground Injection Control: No Commercial TSD: No Used Oil Transporter: No Used Oil Transfer Facility: No Used Oil Processor: No Used Oil Refiner. No Used Oil Burner: No Used Oil Market Burner. No Used Oil Spec Marketer: No erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1343 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19800814 Handler Name: EECO Federal Waste Generator Code: 1 Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator Source Type: Notification Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No: 1 Receive Date: 19960901 Handler Name: EECO Federal Waste Generator Code: 2 Generator Code Description: Small Quantity Generator Source Type: Implementer Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No: Type: Private Street 1: 1601 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE Name: EECO INCORPORATED Street 2: Date Became Current: City: CITY NOT REPORTED Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-835-6000 Country: Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 99999 Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No: Type: Private Street 1: 1601 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE Name: EECO INCORPORATED Street 2: Date Became Current: City: SANTA ANA Date Ended Current: State: CA Phone: 714-835-6000 Country: Source Type: Notification Zip Code: 92701 Historical Handler Details Receive Dt: 19800814 Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator Handler Name: EECO 56 2of6 Estor/EPA ID: 30360' Site Code: 40418' Nat Priority List: NO Acres: 10 ACf Special Program: Funding: SCHOi Assembly District: 69 Senate District. 34 School District: APN: Cleanup Status: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: Site Type: Office: Past Use that Caused Contain: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contamin of Concern: SW 0.621 126.091 RAYMOND VILLA SCHOOL 3,275.59 -18 1441 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92701-6318 Permit Renewal Lead. Project Manager: Supervisor. > Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074406 DISTRICT County: ORANGE Latitude: 33.742737 Longitude:-117.849361 SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NONE SPECIFIED REFER: RCRA AS OF 8/12/2002 DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY SCHOOL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH MANUFACTURING - ELECTRONIC NONE SPECIFIED erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB SCH Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1344 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) NONE SPECIFIED SITE HISTORY. Status: Program Type: CalEnviroScreen Score: Summary Link: Completed Activities Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Date Completed: Comments: 56 3 of 6 Estor/EPA ID: Site Code: Nat Priority List: APN: Census Tract: Site Type: Address Description: Office: REFER:RCRA SCHOOL INVESTIGATION 81-85% https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30360188 Workplan https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=30360188&doc_id=6003258 Workplan 4/4/2007 Finalize, discuss with Peter Garcia, Get peters signature, send the comment letter for the workplan out Sw 0.621 3,275.59 80001539 400216 NO 011-154-41 6059074406 CORRECTIVE ACTION 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & SANTA SUSANA Special Program: Funding: Cleanup Status: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contamin of Concern: 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHAN E Site History: 126.091 EECOINC -18 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SANTA ANA CA 927010000 Assembly District: Senate District: Permit Renewal Lead: Public Partici Spclst: Project Manager: County: Latitude: Longitude: Acres: Supervisor. ACTIVE AS OF 1/1/2008 DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM 69 34 HAROLD (BUD) DUKE ORANGE 33.742815 -117.848957 10 ACRES JOSE SALCEDO MANUFACTURING - ELECTRONIC OTHER GROUNDWATER AFFECTED (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER) ENVIROSTOR Updated 11/02/07: EECO was a manufacturer of electronic components such as electronic switches, video editing equipment, mini computers, and printed circuit boards. It received an Interim Status Document (ISD) for management of hazardous waste in 1981. The regulated units were a drum storage warehouse, a concrete storage pad containing drums and a storage tank, an underground wastewater neutralization system, an aboveground wastewater neutralization system, and an underground storage tank. The site was sold to the Santa Ana school district in 1989. Closure activities conducted in 1995 identified VOCs that were detected in soil gas and/or groundwater at the site. The origin of the VOC release was a non -regulated outside storage area. Groundwater monitoring wells were installed according to a workplan completed in February 1996. Soil containing copper above the cleanup level was excavated from the Site between 1993 and 1996. RCRA closure certification for the regulated units was accepted by DTSC in a letter dated May 6,1996. DTSC made its acceptance of the closure certification contingent upon implementation of the groundwater monitoring workplan activities. Beginning in July 1998, an intermediate school (grades 6, 7, 8) was constructed on the Site. A Corrective Action Consent Agreement was signed on January 23, 2004. DTSC accepted the results of a risk analysis of soil vapor and indoor air in March 2006. An RFI Workplan was approved on May 17, 2006. Pesticide sampling was conducted in 2006, and DTSC accepted the results of the risk analysis of the pesticide sampling in December 2006. Additional groundwater monitoring has been conducted from 2006 to 2007. DTSC met with the facility consultant on November 27, 2007 to discuss the most recent sampling results and determine the next course of action. Updated 8/13/08: During the November 2007 meeting, DTSC recommended that the facility begin preparation of a Corrective Measures Study (CMS). Final approval of the CMS is expected by December 2008. All previous risk assessments have shown no potential risk to the students or teachers at the school occupying the site. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1345 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB Updated 6/26/09: The facility submitted a draft CMS Workplan on April 27, 2009. DTSC sent comments on the workplan on June 2, 2009, requesting a response within 20 days of the date of receipt of the letter. Updated 12/14/09: The facility submitted a revised CMS workplan in November 2009. DTSC has reviewed the revised workplan and will be providing additional comments. Updated 1/28/11: DTSC approved the CMS Report on April 15, 2010. The facility submitted a draft Statement of Basis on December 16, 2010. DTSC provided comments on January 13, 2011. The facility submitted a revised Statement of Basis on January 25, 2011. A community survey was mailed out on January 4, 2011. Updated 6/14/2011: Public Notice of the Remedy Selection is scheduled for 6/21/2011. Updated 8/9/2011: The Comment Period for the Remedy selection ran from June 21 to August 4, 2011. One comment was received. Updated 11/15/2011: DTSC approved the Remedy Selection on August 18, 2011. Updated 6/21/2012 The Draft Corrective Measures Implementation Workplan was received on October 6, 2011. Final DTSC comments were sent June 30, 2012. The February 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report was received on August 13, 2012. DTSC sent comments on October 10, 2012. The facility submitted a Corrective Measures Implementation Tech Memo on June 10, 2013. Updated 11/3/2014: DTSC determined that groundwater concentrations are not decreasing, and that active remediation should be implemented. The facility disagrees, and refuses to do any more work at the site or pay any more of DTSC's costs. The issue has been referred to DTSC Management. Status: ACTIVE Program Type: CORRECTIVE ACTION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=80001539 Currently Scheduled Activities Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Remedy Selection and Statement of Basis Due Date: 2/28/2019 Revised Date: Completed Activities Title: Response to Santa Ana Unified School District Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 5/12/2015 Comments: Title: Memorandum from Water Board regarding groundwater contamination erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1346 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 2/10/2014 Comments: Title: February 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&doc_id=60306388 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Monitoring Report Date Completed: 10/10/2012 Comments: completed Title: DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR A RFI (CA070) Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: RCRA Facility Assessment Report Date Completed: 1/27/2000 Comments: Added per RR 1/31/07. Ih Title: Evaluate health risk from vapor intrusion Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Other Report Date Completed: 3/10/2016 Comments: completed Title: CMI Tech Memo Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Report Date Completed: 8/13/2013 Comments: completed Title: Letter from facility disputing Final Administrative Decision Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 6/16/2016 Comments: DB Title: Human Exposure Controlled Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&enforcement_id=60299161 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Human Exposure Controlled Date Completed: 7/8/2010 Comments: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1347 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: Correspondence related to dispute with Santa Ana Unified School District Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 6/29/2016 Comments: Title: RFI Report Approval Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&doc_id=60272670 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: RFI Report Date Completed: 5/17/2006 Comments: Title: Letter from DTSC responding to SAUSD dispute Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 4/15/2015 Comments: completed. Title: Corrective Measures Implementation Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Corrective Measure Implementation Workplan Date Completed: 4/15/2014 Comments: Facility Disputes DTSC findings. Title: RFI WORKPLAN APPROVED (CA150) Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&doc_id=6025650 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: RFI Workplan Date Completed: 5/17/2006 Comments: Title: CMS Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&doc_id=60261744 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Corrective Measures Study Report Date Completed: 4/15/2010 Comments: DB Title: Voluntary C A Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&enforcement id=6013994 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Consent Order Date Completed: 1/23/2004 Comments: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1348 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: RFA COMPLETED -ASSESSMENT WAS A RFA (CA050RF) Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&enforcement_id=6015668 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: RCRA Facility Assessment Report Date Completed: 1/27/2000 Comments: Title: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTION -NOT A PA PLUS (CA049PA) Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Date Completed: 1/15/1991 Comments: Title: January 2013 GW Monitoring Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Monitoring Report Date Completed: 6/7/2013 Comments: completed Title: Remedy Constructed Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&enforcement_id=60298853 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Remedy Construction Complete Date Completed: 7/9/2010 Comments: Title: Groundwater Migration Controlled Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&enforcement_id=60299527 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Groundwater Migration Controlled Date Completed: 7/9/2010 Comments: Title: August 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=80001539&doc_id=60316167 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Monitoring Report Date Completed: 4/4/2013 Comments: completed 56 4 of 6 Sw 0.621 126.091 RAYMOND VILLA SCHOOL ENVIROSTOR 3,275.59 -18 1441 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92701-6318 Estor/EPA ID: 30360188 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: 404183 Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1349 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074406 Project Manager: Site Type: SCHOOL County: ORANGE Address Description: 1441 EAST CHESTNUT AVENUE Latitude: 33.742737 Office: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & Longitude: -117.849361 BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH Special Program: Acres: 10 ACRES Funding: SCHOOL DISTRICT Supervisor. Cleanup Status: REFER: RCRA AS OF 8/12/2002 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Past Use that Caused Contam: MANUFACTURING - ELECTRONIC Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History: Status: REFER: RCRA Program Type: SCHOOL INVESTIGATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30360188 Completed Activities DB Title: . Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30360188&doc_id=6003258 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Workplan Date Completed: 4/4/2007 Comments: Finalize, discuss with Peter Garcia, Get peters signature, send the comment letter for the workplan out 56 5 of 6 Sw 0.621 126.091 EECOINC ENVIROSTOR 3,275.59 -18 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SANTA ANA CA 927010000 Estor/EPA ID: CAD008256349 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: 400216 Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: Permit Renewal Lead. APN: Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074406 Project Manager. Site Type: CLOSED County: ORANGE Address Description: 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE Latitude: 33.742815 Office: Longitude:-117.848957 Special Program: Acres: Funding: Supervisor: Cleanup Status: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contamin of Concern: Site History: Status: CLOSED Program Type: HAZ WASTE - RCRA CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=CAD008256349 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1350 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Permit Units - Completed Activities Date: 9/28/1983 Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART B RECEIVED Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Unit Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_showunits? cmd=showpaun its&global_id=CAD008256349&link key=12741 Date: 2/1 /1988 Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVED Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Unit Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_showunits? cmd=showpaun its&global_id=CAD008256349&link_key=12741 Date: 6/26/1992 Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Unit Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_showunits? cmd=showpaun its&global_id=CAD008256349&link key=12741 Date: 11 /19/1980 Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVED Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Unit Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_showunits? cmd=showpaunits&global_id=CAD008256349&link_key=12741 Units Underaoina Closure DB Date: 12/27/1995 Event Description: CLOSURE FINAL - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATION Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Date: 5/6/1996 Event Description: CLOSURE FINAL - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATION Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca. gov/public/site_documents/1130979239/1996%2D05%2D06%20Closure%20Certification%20Letter%20EECO% 2Epdf 56 6 of 6 Sw 0.621 126.091 EECOINC HWP 3,275.59 -18 1441 E CHESTNUT AVE SANTA ANA CA 927010000 Estor/EPA ID: CAD008256349 Permit Renewal Lead. Site Code: 400216 Project Manager: Nat Priority List: Supervisor. Acres: Public Partici Spclst: Special Program: Census Tract: 6059074406 Funding: County: ORANGE Assembly District. 69 Latitude: 33.742815 Senate District: 34 Longitude:-117.848957 School District: APN: Cleanup Status: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: Site Type: CLOSED Office: Past Use that Caused Contam: Potential Media Affected: Status: CLOSED Program Type: HAZ WASTE - RCRA erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1351 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=CAD008256349 Permit Units - Completed Activities Date: 6/26/1992 Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Unit Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_showunits? cmd=showpaunits&global_id=CAD008256349&link_key=12741 Date: 11 /19/1980 Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVED Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Unit Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_showunits? cmd=showpaun its&global_id=CAD008256349&link_key=12741 Date: 2/1 /1988 Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVED Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Unit Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_showunits? cmd=showpaunits&global_id=CAD008256349&link_key=12741 Date: 9/28/1983 Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART B RECEIVED Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: Unit Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_showunits? cmd=showpaun its&global_id=CAD008256349&link_key=12741 DB Units Undergoing Closure Date: 5/6/1996 Event Description: CLOSURE FINAL - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATION Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca. gov/public/site_documents/1130979239/1996%2D05%2D06%20Closure%20Certification%20Letter%20EECO% 2Epdf Date: 12/27/1995 Event Description: CLOSURE FINAL - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATION Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS Doc Link: 57 1 of 1 W 0.641 143.191 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER THE ENVIROSTOR 3,368.85 -1 625 N. GRAND AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID: 71002942 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead. APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074406 Project Manager: Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: ORANGE Address Description: 625 N. GRAND AVENUE Latitude: 33.750856 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude: -117.851543 Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Supervisor. Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1352 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History: Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Program Type: TIERED PERMIT CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=71002942 58 1 of 1 NNE 0.681 174.531 FORMER DRY CLEANER, SANTA 3,597.89 30 ANA, CALIFORNIA NORTHEAST CORNER 17TH AND TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92705 Estor/EPA ID: 60001948 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: 401659 Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: APN: 396-312-04, 396-312-05, 396-312-07, 396- Public Partici Spclst: TIMOTHY CHAUVEL 312-08, 396-312-09 Census Tract: 6059075504 Project Manager. FARAH ITANI Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP County: ORANGE Address Description: NORTHEAST CORNER 17TH AND TUSTIN Latitude: 33.7596104624621 AVENUE Office: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & Longitude:-117.833894066132 BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH Special Program: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Acres: 1.77 ACRES Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor: EMAD YEMUT Cleanup Status: ACTIVE AS OF 11/18/2013 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: DRY CLEANING Potential Media Affected: SOIL, UNDER INVESTIGATION Potential Contamin of Concern: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) Site History: DB ENVIROSTOR The Site consists of approximately 4.1 acres of vacant land. From around 1960 to 1997, the Site contained several buildings that were used for a variety of commercial purposes including a dry cleaner, gas station, hardware store, real estate office and other businesses. Prior to that time, the land at the Site was used for agricultural purposes (orange groves). All buildings were demolished in 1997 to build a drug store. That development was cancelled and the Site has been a vacant fenced open plot of land. Both the dry cleaner and gas station had chemical releases to soil that were investigated and later closed by the Orange County Environmental Health Care Agency. Subsequent testing found the chemical release from the dry cleaner was more extensive than previously identified. As a result in 2013, the property owner entered into a voluntary cleanup program agreement with DTSC to evaluate and remediate environmental conditions at the Site. Status: ACTIVE Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CalEnviroScreen Score: 51-55% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60001948 Currently Scheduled Activities Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Workplan Due Date: 1/27/2022 Revised Date: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1353 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Future Activities Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Remedy Constructed: Operating Properly & Successfully Due Date: 2022 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report Due Date: 2023 Completed Activities Title: Revise draft Removal Action Work Plan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60397737 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Workplan Date Completed: 1/11/2016 Comments: Completed for Public Notice Title: Public Notice Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60364850 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Public Notice Date Completed: 1/4/2016 Comments: Final Public Notice Title: Community Profile/Plan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60398813 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Community Profile Date Completed: 12/30/2015 Comments: Title: INO - Site Mitigation Measure (Vapor Barrier) Implementation Plan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60489701 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Workplan Date Completed: 11/19/2020 Comments: Conditional approval letter of the INO VIMS Design has been sent to RP and activity has been completed. DB Title: FY 19/20 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60465382 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 10/16/2019 Comments: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1354 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: FY 18/19 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60446133 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 7/31/2018 Comments: FY 1819 Estimate: $$30,496 Title: Comfort letter Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60437182 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 10/16/2017 Comments: completed. Title: SSI Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60361898 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Report Date Completed: 6/17/2015 Comments: Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate FY14/15 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60388177 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 1/13/2015 Comments: Completed Annual Estimate for FY 1415. Title: Dry Well Abandonment Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60497983 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Report Date Completed: 8/23/2021 Comments: DTSC approved the report on 8/23/2021. Title: GW Remedial Investigation Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60493972 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Remedial Investigation Report Date Completed: 4/15/2021 Comments: Title: Remediation Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60415340 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Operation and Maintenance Report Date Completed: 5/24/2017 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1355 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Comments: Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Date Completed: Comments: Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Date Completed: Comments: Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Date Completed: Comments: Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Date Completed: Comments: Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Date Completed: Comments: Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Date Completed: Comments: Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Conditional Aprroval FY 20/21 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60484625 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate 9/8/2020 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter completed. DB 12-28-2017 Prospective Tenant Request for DTSC comfort letter in re 13872-13972 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana Hall Property (Hall Site). https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60439461 Correspondence 8/17/2018 Completed Annual Oversight Cost Estimate for FY 17/18 https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60430451 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate 9/26/2017 FY 16/17 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60414518 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate 9/16/2016 FY 1617 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate completed and mailed. Voluntary Cleanup Agreement https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60343430 Standard Voluntary Agreement 11/18/2013 A Voluntary Cleanup Agreement was fully executed between DTSC and Proponet, John C. Hall, Trustee Community Profile Update https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60499205 Community Profile 8/2/2021 Updated Scope of Work and Cost Estimate https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60479743 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1356 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 5/18/2020 Comments: Letter was sent to proponent. Title: Fact Sheet Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60364848 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Fact Sheets Date Completed: 1/4/2016 Comments: Title: FY 1516 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60402624 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 11/13/2015 Comments: FY1516 Cost Estimate completed. DB Title: DTSC statement about proposed remedy Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 7/8/2021 Comments: DTSC provided a letter statement regarding the proposed remedy and any potential future needs of more remedial features. Title: Remedial Design and Implementation Workplan - SVE Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60465376 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Design/Implementation Workplan Date Completed: 10/2/2020 Comments: Title: Project Management in FY 20-21 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Project Management Date Completed: 6/30/2021 Comments: DTSC PM conducted management over the fiscal year of 20/21. Title: CFA - Site Mitigation Measure (Vapor Barrier) Implementation Plan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60490212 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Workplan Date Completed: 12/4/2020 Comments: Title: Existing Wastewater System Abandonment Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60485665 Area Name: Area Link: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1357 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB (mi/ft) (ft) Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Workplan Date Completed: 9/3/2020 Comments: Title: CEQA-Notice of Exemption Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&enforcement id=60364852 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: CEQA - Notice of Exemption Date Completed: 2/25/2016 Comments: Signed NOE Title: SUPPLEMENTAL SITE INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&doc_id=60353187 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Workplan Date Completed: 3/13/2014 Comments: DTSC approved the SSI Workplan Title: LUC Oversight requirments Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001948&enforcement_id=60461818 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 7/1/2019 Comments: 59 1 of 1 W 0.851 137.331 FREEWAY AUTO WRECKERS 4,479.30 -7 1041 EAST 6TH STREET ENVIROSTOR SANTA ANA CA 92709 Estor/EPA ID: 30990003 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead. APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074406 Project Manager: Site Type: EVALUATION County: ORANGE Address Description: 1041 EAST 6TH STREET Latitude: 33.7499994360693 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude: -117.85454750061 Special Program: EPA - PASI Acres: 2 ACRES Funding: EPA GRANT Supervisor. EILEEN MANANIAN Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 8/4/2015 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: US EPA - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contain: BATTERY MANUFACTURING, JUNKYARD, MANUFACTURING - PESTICIDES, RECYCLING - OTHER, RECYCLING - SCRAP METAL Potential Media Affected: SOIL Potential Contamin of Concern: METALS VOLATILE ORGANICS (8260B VOCS) Site History: Former operations at the site have apparently included the manufacturing of agriculture chemicals insecticides and liquid fertilizers. A battery manufacturing business has also been reported as having operated on or adjacent to this site. High concentrations of lead and antimony have been detected in the soil. Currently the site is an abandoned lot, with bare soil on the surface. Sampling events occurred on 2/88, 2/91, and 8/94 in which many contaminants were detected. DTSC has sent letters to the managers, inviting them to perform a preliminary endargerment assessment on this site, they have not responded. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1358 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Program Type: EVALUATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30990003 Completed Activities Title: PA/SI Site Reassessment Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: PA/SI Reassessment Date Completed: 5/29/2015 Comments: DB Title: Site screening (reassessment) Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30990003&enforcement_id=6016827 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: PA/SI Reassessment Date Completed: 12/3/2006 Comments: 60 1 of 1 ESE 0.851 134.381 RED HILL/VALENCIA K-5 SCHOOL SCH 4,503.13 -10 RED HILL AVENUE/SANTA FE DRIVE TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID: 30970014 Site Code: 404371 Nat Priority List: NO Acres: 10 ACRES Special Program: Funding: SCHOOL DISTRICT Assembly District. 68 Senate District. 37 School District: APN: Cleanup Status: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: Site Type: Office: Past Use that Caused Contam: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contamin of Concern: CHLORDANE SITE HISTORY. Permit Renewal Lead: Project Manager: Supervisor. Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: County: Latitude: Longitude: 091A1►19L'1wey13�-1 6059075505 ORANGE 33.7431473030955 -117.825487907392 TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NONE SPECIFIED NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 4/8/2004 DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY SCHOOL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH NATIONAL SECURITY/INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS SOIL The site is located on Parcel 21 of the Marine Corps Air Station in Tustin. Currently the site consists of 3 residential structure and 5 concrete pads which formerly displayed helicopters. The three residential structures were built in 1946. The concrete pads were erected in the 1980's and were used to display show helicopters. Prior to the acquisition of the site by the United States government in 1942, the site was used for citrus groves. Concerns at the site include lead from lead based paint, asbestos, septic tanks, and pesticides. Status: NO FURTHER ACTION Program Type: SCHOOL INVESTIGATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 41-45% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30970014 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1359 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Completed Activities Title: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Date Completed: 4/8/2004 Comments: DTSC issued a no further action Title: Environmental Oversight Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30970014&enforcement_id=6003514 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Date Completed: 12/24/2002 Comments: Title: ' Site Visit - Site Inspections/visit Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed: 10/23/2002 Comments: Title: Phase 1 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Phase 1 Date Completed: 8/9/2002 Comments: Title: PEA Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Workplan Date Completed: 4/10/2003 Comments: 61 1 of 1 NE 0.87/ 172.621 TUSTIN'S FRENCH QUARTER ENVIROSTOR 4,573.89 28 SHOPPING CENTER 17301 17TH STREET TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID: 60001388 Assembly District: 68 Site Code: 401555 Senate District: 37 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead. APN: 395-142-05, 395-142-06, 395-142-07, 395- Public Partici Spc/st: 142-08, 395-142-09 Census Tract: 6059075701 Project Manager: S. STEVEN HARIRI Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP County: ORANGE Address Description: 17301 17TH STREET Latitude: 33.759872 Office: ENGINEERING & SPECIAL PROJECTS Longitude:-117.82871 Special Program: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Acres: 5.5 ACRES Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor. JU-TSENG LIU erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1360 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Cleanup Status: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contamin of Concern: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) Site History: NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 10/31/2011 DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY DRY CLEANING SOIL VAPOR DB A Voluntary Cleanup Agreement (Agreement) with Tustin Properties LLC (Proponent) was entered concerning the site located at 17301 17th Street in Tustin, California 92780, Orange County, identified by Orange County Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 395-142-05, 06, 07, 08 and 09, and any off - site area to which hazardous substances have or may have migrated from the Site. The total area of the site is approximately 5.5 acres. Based on the information available to DTSC and Proponent, previous dry-cleaning operations have lead to perch loroethylene contamination in the soil and soil gas. Status: NO FURTHER ACTION Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CalEnviroScreen Score: 41-45% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60001388 Completed Activities Title: Site visit Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed: 12/16/2010 Comments: Title: Environmental Site Assessment Tech Memo Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001388&doc_id=60259822 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Date Completed: 5/16/2011 Comments: NFA letter issued. Title: Environmental Site Assessment Tech Memo Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001388&doc_id=60259665 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Date Completed: 12/17/2010 Comments: Title: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60001388&enforcement_id=60259406 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Standard Voluntary Agreement Date Completed: 12/10/2010 Comments: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement fully executed. 62 1 of 1 WNW 0.871 150.721 WASHINGTON SANTA ANA ENVIROSTOR 4,576.93 7 HOUSING PARTNERS erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1361 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) 1126 AND 1146 E WASHINGTON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID: 60003099 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: 401955 Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: APN: 398-092-13, 398-092-14 Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074406 Project Manager: TRISS CHESNEY Site Type: EVALUATION County: ORANGE Address Description: 1126 AND 1146 E WASHINGTON AVE Latitude: 33.7550857794036 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude: -117.854563440475 Special Program: EPA - TARGET SITE INVESTIGATION Acres: 2.29 ACRES Funding: EPA GRANT Supervisor. MARYAM TASNIF-ABBASI Cleanup Status: ACTIVE AS OF 2/3/2021 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History: DB A Community of Friends (nonprofit) submitted a Targeted Site Investigation Plus (TSI+) program application for a brownfield site consisting of two parcels, located at 1126 and 1146 E Washington Ave in Santa Ana. A Community of Friends is part of a development partnership known as Washington Santa Ana Housing Partners that is planning to develop this 2.286-acre vacant property into a new 86-unit multifamily affordable housing apartment community. The TSI+ program is funded by a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). DTSC received approval to from EPA on February 3, 2021. The property is in a census tract with a CalEnviroScreen score of 80-85% (within top 25% of California communities with higher pollution burden and vulnerability) and is in a Qualified Opportunity Zone. The property consists of two parcels, one owned by the County of Orange, the other by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana. On February 25, 2020, WSAHP entered into an Option Agreement with the property owner which provides site access. WSAHP has secured a combination of public and private financing sources necessary to develop the proposed 86- unit affordable housing project. DTSC is proposing to conduct a Supplemental Phase II Assessment, including a human health risk assessment, and prepare a Cleanup Plan in an effort to help WSAHP qualify for DTSC's Cleanup Loans and Environmental Assistance to Neighborhoods (CLEAN) loan program for cleanup implementation. Status: ACTIVE Program Type: EVALUATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60003099 Currently Scheduled Activities Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Report Due Date: 4/1/2022 Revised Date: Completed Activities Title: Supplemental Site Investigation Work Plan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Workplan Date Completed: 7/2/2021 Comments: Title: TSI+ Pilot Selection Letter Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60003099&enforcement_id=60498260 Area Name: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1362 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB (mi/ft) (ft) Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 2/11/2021 Comments: Title: Targeted Site Investigation Work Order Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60003099&enforcement_id=60498265 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: State/Federal Funded Site Work Order Date Completed: 4/26/2021 Comments: Title: TSI+ Pilot Program Application Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60003099&doc_id=60493604 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Other Report Date Completed: 2/11/2021 Comments: Title: Screening Level Human Health Risk Assessment Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Report Date Completed: 9/10/2021 Comments: 63 1 of 1 WSW 0.901 125.641 SO CAL GAS/SANTA ANA I 4,742.36 -19 (MINNIE ST) MGP ENVIROSTOR 111 SOUTH MINNIE STREET SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID: 30490108 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: 400343 Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead. APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074405 Project Manager: CHAND SULTANA Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP County: ORANGE Address Description: 111 SOUTH MINNIE STREET Latitude: 33.744824897444 Office: CLEANUP CHATSWORTH Longitude: -117.85528897686 Special Program: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Acres: 1.5 ACRES Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor. ALLAN PLAZA Cleanup Status: ACTIVE AS OF 7/18/2001 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT Potential Media Affected: SOIL Potential Contamin of Concern: BENZENE LEAD MERCURY (ELEMENTAL) POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PANS) TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) Site History: The site is on 1.50 acres located in the City of Santa Ana. It is currently occupied by a plastic related business The majority of the site is paved and no evidence of anv MGP related odors or visible residues remain. The Santa Ana I site was inspected by DTSC staff on March 22. 1994. The site is erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1363 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) DB currently occupied by a lumber company. The PEA Report dated December 1, 1993 (analytical) shows high levels of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and poly- nuclear aromatics, lead, and total petroleum hydrocarbons. The PEA recommended no emergency removal be conducted because of limited exposure to the substances at the site. Additional investigation, however is recommended for the Site around the former concrete oil tank area. DTSC recommends that a low permeability fill be added to the planter boxes that have high levels of lead. The RWQCB may be concerned with the elevated levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons. The Site occupies approximately 1.59 acres of land and was developed in 1905 by Edison Electric Company (Edison) to manufacture gas from oil. The gas generation and processing equipment was dismantled between 1917 and 1921 and converted to a natural gas storage and distribution facility. The Site was not used for MGP purposes after 1921 and continued the natural gas distribution until 1960, and the Southern California Gas Company (the Gas Company) sold the property in 1960. The Site is currently owned and operated by Santa Ana Partners, which leases the 1011 East Walnut Avenue property to A.L.L. Roofing and Business Materials and the 1013 East Walnut Avenue property to Weathering Roofing. A.L.L. Roofing and Weathering Roofing were constructed in 1931 and 1941, respectively, and used the Site as both office and warehouse for the storage of roofing materials. The Site is surrounded by mixed commercial and residential properties. A Burlington, Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad line exists immediately east of the Site. The majority of the site is paved and no evidence of any MGP related odors or visible residues remain. The Santa Ana I site was inspected by DTSC staff on March 22, 1994. The site was then occupied by a lumber company. The Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Report dated December 1, 1993 (analytical) shows high levels of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and poly- nuclear aromatics, lead, and total petroleum hydrocarbons. The PEA recommended no emergency removal be conducted because of limited exposure to the substances at the site. Additional investigation, however is recommended for the Site around the former concrete oil tank area. DTSC recommended that a low permeability fill be added to the planter boxes that have high levels of lead. The RWQCB may be concerned with the elevated levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons. On July 18, 2001, the Gas Company and Edison singed a Voluntary Cleanup Agreement with DTSC to investigate and remediate the site if necessary. Subsequently, all onsite investigations were completed and a RAW was approved by DTSC on February 7, 2006. All the remedial activities at the Site were conducted in accordance with the DTSC- approved RAW and the Removal Action Completion Report (RACR) was submitted to DTSC. The RACR documents excavation and off -site disposal of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, heavy metals and total petroleum hydrocarbons. Status: ACTIVE Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CalEnviroScreen Score: 86-90% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30490108 Future Activities Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Land Use Restriction Due Date: 2022 Completed Activities Title: Annual Cost Estimation Letter for 2008 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&enforcement_id=6011752 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 11/9/2007 Comments: DTSC sent the cost estimate for the upcoming year. Title: Order Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&enforcement_id=5007679 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Standard Voluntary Agreement Date Completed: 7/18/2001 Comments: A Voluntary Cleanup Agreement was signed for RI, combined with Former Whittier MGP, Former Monrovia MGP, Former Riverside MGP, and Former Pomona MGP. Title: Yearly Cost Estimation Letter - 2010 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&enforcement_id=6017646 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1364 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 11/18/2009 Comments: Title: Annual Cost Estimate Letter - 2009 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&enforcement_id=6013355 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 1/7/2009 Comments: Title: Additional Soil Gas Survey Analytical Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=6019934 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: 'Correspondence - Received Date Completed: 8/11/2008 Comments: DB Title: Work Plan for Additional Soil Gas Survey Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=6017944 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Workplan Date Completed: 5/21/2008 Comments: The Workplan and the addendum are proposed to evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion to indoor air. The results of the soil gas survey will be used to determine site -specific risks, if any, and to develop a plan of action to mitigate the risk if necessary. Title: IS & Negative Declaration Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&enforcement_id=6007615 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: CEQA - Initial Study/ Neg. Declaration Date Completed: 2/27/2006 Comments: Title: Removal Action Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=5007677 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Workplan Date Completed: 2/27/2006 Comments: DTSC approved the removal Action Workplan on February 27, 2006 Title: Supplemental Site Investigation/Health Risk Assessment Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=5007678 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Report Date Completed: 3/12/2004 Comments: DTSC approved the Supplemental Site Investiagation/Health Risk Assessment Report. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1365 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Title: Annual Cost Estimate Letter - 2008 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&enforcement_id=6013354 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 11/9/2007 Comments: Title: Remedial Investigation Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=6016432 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Workplan Date Completed: 8/30/2002 Comments: RP adequately addressed DTSC's comments dated July 10, 2002. Title: Removal Action Completion Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=6008084 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report Date Completed: 8/16/2010 Comments: DTSC approved the RACR and referred the project to Chand Sultana of Chatsworth Office for the placement of LUC, which includes the Soil Management Plan and Operation & Maintenance Agreement. Title: Pre-Remediation Soil Gas Survey Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=6016127 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Other Report Date Completed: 8/20/2007 Comments: Title: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=5007680 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Date Completed: 12/21/1994 Comments: Title: Order Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Standard Voluntary Agreement Date Completed: 8/20/1993 Comments: Title: Work Plan for Assessment and Closure of Abandoned Concrete Underground Storage Tank Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=6015948 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Tank Removal Workplan erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1366 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Date Completed: 6/29/2007 Comments: Title: Workplan for Soil Gas Survey Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30490108&doc_id=6015217 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Workplan Date Completed: 4/27/2007 Comments: 64 1 of 1 Estor/EPA ID: Site Code: Nat Priority List: APN: Census Tract: Site Type: Address Description: Office: NNE 0.911 4,797.14 60002324 401736, 401736 NO 396-301-06 6059075701 VOLUNTARY CLEANUP 1941 N. TUSTIN AVENUE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH DB 184.381 DANNY K CLEANERS (FORMER) ENVIROSTOR 40 1941 N. TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92705 Assembly District: Senate District: Permit Renewal Lead. Public Partici Spclst: Project Manager. County: Latitude: Longitude: ,69 ,34 GREG SWEEL ORANGE 33.763491863081 -117.835248426914 Special Program: Acres: 0.08 ACRES Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor. YOLANDA GARZA Cleanup Status: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLY AS OF 2/9/2021 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: DRY CLEANING Potential Media Affected: SOIL VAPOR Potential Contamin of Concern: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) Site History: The site currently consists of two empty suites and an adjacent asphalt parking lot. This was the location of the former Danny K Cleaners that operated on the property for approximately 15 years. On November 22, 2016, DTSC and the property owner entered into a Voluntary Cleanup Agreement (VCA) to conduct a Risk Assessment of the residual volatile organic compounds (VOCs) remaining beneath the building and prepare a Land Use Covenant. Status: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLY - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CalEnviroScreen Score: 41-45% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60002324 Land Use Restrictions Site Management LAND USE COVENANT Requirements: Title: Land Use Covenant Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/view_document? docurl=/public/deliverable_documents/8523345768/Danny%20K%20Cleaners%20%2D%20Fully%20Executed% 20and%20Recorded%20LUC%20%2D%20final%20%2810%2D9%2D18%29%2Epdf Date Recorded: 10/9/2018 Future Activities Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1367 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Due Date: 2023 Completed Activities Title: FY 20/21 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&enforcement_id=60448781 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 9/14/2020 Comments: Title: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&doc_id=60447894 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report Date Completed: 1/28/2019 Comments: Title: FY 19/20 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&enforcement_id=60448780 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 9/10/2019 Comments: Completed on 9/10/2019. Title: FY 18/19 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&enforcement_id=60447907 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 9/5/2018 Comments: FY 1819 Estimate: $10,642 Title: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&enforcement id=60407410 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Standard Voluntary Agreement Date Completed: 11/22/2016 Comments: Fully executed VCA. Title: Project Management Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Project Management Date Completed: 6/30/2021 Comments: DTSC completed PM for the FY. Title: PEA Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&doc_id=60424252 Area Name: Area Link: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1368 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Date Completed: 5/18/2017 Comments: Conditional Approval Letter Title: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&doc_id=60447896 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report Date Completed: 1/20/2021 Comments: Completed Title: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&doc_id=60447895 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report Date Completed: 1/13/2020 Comments: Title: Existing Data Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&doc_id=60421625 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Other Report Date Completed: 2/28/2017 Comments: Final DTSC Letter DB Title: Land Use Covenant Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002324&enforcement id=60441734 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Land Use Restriction Date Completed: 10/9/2018 Comments: Fully Executed & Recorded Final LUC 65 1 of 1 SSW 0.961 107.561 BREAK -FREE, INC. 5,052.41 -37 1035 S. LINWOOD AVENUE ENVIROSTOR SANTA ANA CA 92705 Estor/EPA ID: 30280535 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074403 Project Manager: Site Type: EVALUATION County: ORANGE Address Description: 1035 S. LINWOOD AVENUE Latitude: 33.7358937429589 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude: -117.847875705577 Special Program: Acres: 0 ACRES Funding: NOT APPLICABLE Supervisor. Cleanup Status: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY AS OF 3/15/2000 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: ORANGE COUNTY - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contain: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1369 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Site History: Status: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY Program Type: EVALUATION CalEnviroScreen Score: 86-90% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30280535 Completed Activities Title: SIB 1248 Notification Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=30280535&doc_id=6017493 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: SB 1248 Notification Date Completed: 3/10/2000 Comments: DTSC is not involved with this project. DB 66 1 of 1 S 0.97/ 111.321 7-ELEVEN STORE NO. 13799 5,104.90 -33 16791 MCFADDEN AVENUE ENVIROSTOR TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID: 60003062 Assembly District: 68 Site Code: 401938 Senate District: 37 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: APN: 402-301-07, 402-301-08 Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074408 Project Manager: MAN LIU Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP County: ORANGE Address Description: 16791 MCFADDEN AVENUE Latitude: 33.73442 Office: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS & Longitude:-117.83676 BROWNFIELDS OUTREACH Special Program: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Acres: 0.6 ACRES Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor. YOLANDA GARZA Cleanup Status: ACTIVE AS OF 11/13/2020 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contain: DRY CLEANING Potential Media Affected: INDOOR AIR, SOIL, SOIL VAPOR, UNDER INVESTIGATION Potential Contamin of Concern: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) UNDER INVESTIGATION Site History: The Site is approximately 0.6 acres in size and is bordered by McFadden Avenue followed by commercial properties to the south, a vacant lot to the east, commercial properties to the north, and a residential apartment complex to the west. A gas station is present to the southeast, across McFadden Avenue, and a vacant lot is present adjoining to the east with commercial businesses. The Site is currently developed with a two unit commercial building which is occupied by a 7-Eleven convenience store and a coin operated laundromat. The Site has operated as a convenience store since 1972 and historically as Quick Quality Cleaners, a dry cleaner, between 1980 and 2014. In 2014 the coin laundry replaced the dry cleaning operation. The surrounding area is comprised of a mix of commercial and residential properties. Status: ACTIVE Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CalEnviroScreen Score: 61-65% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60003062 Future Activities Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1370 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Sub Area Link: Document Type: Supplemental Site Investigation Report Due Date: 2022 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Workplan Due Date: 2022 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report Due Date: 2023 Completed Activities Title: Site Visit for SSI Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60003062&doc_id=60495978 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Fieldwork Date Completed: 5/28/2021 Comments: Site Visit report for initial site walk on May 18, 2021. DB Title: Review of Background Document /PEA Equivalent Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60003062&doc_id=60491890 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Date Completed: 4/20/2021 Comments: DTSC completed the background review and provided the comments to RP on the scoping meeting on 4/20/2021. Title: Standard Voluntary Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60003062&enforcement_id=60490452 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Standard Voluntary Agreement Date Completed: 3/24/2021 Comments: Branch Chief signed SVA of 7-Eleven on 3/24/2021. Title: Request for Additional Documents Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Correspondence Date Completed: 4/29/2021 Comments: Letter to request information to 7-Eleven for plans for site demolition and future re -development. Title: Project Management Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Project Management Date Completed: 6/30/2021 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1371 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Comments: 67 1 of 1 SSE 0.981 110.841 QUICK QUALITY CLEANERS 5,175.94 -33 16795 E. MCFADDEN AVENUE TUSTIN CA 92780 Estor/EPA ID: 30720008 Assembly District: 68 Site Code: Senate District: 37 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst: Census Tract: 6059074408 Project Manager: Site Type: EVALUATION County: ORANGE Address Description: 16795 E. MCFADDEN AVENUE Latitude: 33.734225521382 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude:-117.836474412505 Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: NOT APPLICABLE Supervisor. Cleanup Status: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY AS OF 3/6/2001 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contamin of Concern: NONE SPECIFIED Site History: Status: Program Type: CalEnviroScreen Score: Summary Link: Completed Activities Title: Title Link: Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Date Completed: Comments: NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY EVALUATION 61-65% https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=30720008 SB 1248 https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_docu ments2?global_id=30720008&doc_id=6019368 SB 1248 Notification 3/6/2001 SB 1248 Orange County 68 1 of 1 W 0.991 129.251 FORMER TOM'S TRUCK 5,201.45 -15 CENTER/RICE AUTO PARTS 936 EAST 3RD STREET SANTA ANA CA 92701 Estor/EPA ID: 60002735 Assembly District: 69 Site Code: 401852 Senate District: 34 Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead: APN: 398-461-03, 398-471-01, 398-471-02, 398- Public Partici Spclst: 471-03, 398-471-06, 398-472-01, 398-472-03, 398-472-04, 398-472-05, 398-472-06 Census Tract: 6059074405 Project Manager: Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP County: ORANGE Address Description: 936 EAST 3RD STREET Latitude: 33.7468368945139 Office: CLEANUP CYPRESS Longitude: -117.857464626984 Special Program: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Acres: 6.7 ACRES Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor. MARYAM TASNIF-ABBASI Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED AS OF 7/27/2020 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District: Past Use that Caused Contam: BATTERY STORAGE, ENGINE TESTING/REPAIR, FUEL - VEHICLE STORAGE/ REFUELING Potential Media Affected: SOIL erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB ENVIROSTOR ENVIROSTOR Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1372 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Potential Contamin of Concern: LEAD TPH-MOTOR OIL Site History: DB The overall site comprises approximately 6.7 acres and had been primarily occupied by two businesses over the past 20 plus years. Rice Auto Parts had occupied the southwest portion of the porperty (1.75 acres) bounded by Garfield on the west, 3rd St. on the north, and 2nd St. on the south, and had been addressed as 905 E. 2nd St. Rice Auto had been the subject of subsurface investigations and remedial action (excavation of impacted soils) under regulatory supervision by OCHCA (Case #071C013). This case was closed in Feb. 2008, and it is currently a vacant lot. The remainder of the property was essentially occupied by Tom's Truck Center with a primary address of 936-1000 E. 3rd Street. This main facility is bounded by 3rd St. on the north, Standard Ave. on the east, and 2nd Ave. on the south, and is improved with buildings for truck sales, parts, service and storage. It had included a bermed area for waste oil ASTs and hazardous waste storage (at the rear of the main building), with truck service conducted in the northeast quadrant of the site. (Building specifically addressed as 928-936 E. 3rd St). The remainder of the property had been located along the north side of 3rd St. and had been used for storage of towed vehicles (927 E. 3rd St.), fueling and washing (1008 E. 4th St.) which included a clarifier and a former UST, and parts strorage (1022-1028 E. 4th St.). The parts storage building included a vehicle wash rack area and clarifier in the rear. All business operations have ceased at the site and moved elsewhere, and all USTs, hazardous materials and wastes, and other significant surficial pieces of equipment have been removed. The surrounding land use is commercial, recycling, self -storage, wrecking yards, with residential beyond 3rd St. northwest and southwest of the former Rice Auto lot. Status: INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CalEnviroScreen Score: 86-90% Summary Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60002735 Completed Activities Title: Annual Cost Estimate 2019-2020 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&enforcement_id=60458509 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Date Completed: 12/10/2019 Comments: Title: Arsenic data validation and re -analyses Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60460290 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Report Date Completed: 5/22/2019 Comments: Title: Supplemental Site Investigation Report Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60455840 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Report Date Completed: 5/21/2019 Comments: Title: Removal Action Report Updated Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60476104 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report Date Completed: 5/28/2020 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1373 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Comments: Title: No Further Action Letter Former TOm's Truck Center Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&enforcement_id=60478990 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: No Further Action Letter Date Completed: 5/28/2020 Comments: Title: Removal Action Workplan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60455730 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Removal Action Workplan Date Completed: 11/21/2019 Comments: Title: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&enforcement_id=60452728 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Standard Voluntary Agreement Date Completed: 11/1/2018 Comments: VCA completed and signed. Title: Additional Groundwater, Soil, and Vapor Probes Sampling Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60460647 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Technical Workplan Date Completed: 7/10/2019 Comments: Title: Streamlined Supplemental Site Investigation Work Plan Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60455309 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Site Characterization Workplan Date Completed: 1/8/2019 Comments: Title: Communiy Update Tom's Truck Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60470018 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Fact Sheets Date Completed: 10/14/2019 Comments: Title: Notice of Exemption Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&enforcement_id=60455732 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: CEQA - Notice of Exemption erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1374 10/3/2023 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site Records (mi/ft) (ft) Date Completed: 11/15/2019 Comments: Title: Public Notice Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60466780 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Public Notice Date Completed: 10/14/2019 Comments: Title: Limited Site Investigation EEI 2018 Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60454177 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Other Report Date Completed: 11/20/2018 Comments: Title: Removal Action Implementation Field Work Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60458505 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Fieldwork Date Completed: 12/10/2019 Comments: Title: Secound round of Soil Gas Sampling fieldwork Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60476102 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Fieldwork Date Completed: 3/4/2020 Comments: Title: Community Survey / Community Profile Title Link: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002735&doc_id=60455734 Area Name: Area Link: Sub Area: Sub Area Link: Document Type: Community Profile Date Completed: 10/18/2019 Comments: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services DB Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1375 10/3/2023 Total: 2 Unplottable sites DB CHMIRS ERNS Unplottable Summary Company Name/Site Address City Zip ERIS ID Name BNSF Near 4th Street (only info avail) Santa Ana CA 821850330 Notified Date: 11/5/200205:39:45 PM 4TH ST DOT NUMBER:UNKNOWN SANTA ANNA CA 807101796 NRC Report No: 431145 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services City Council 18 — 1376 Order No: 21121600065 10/3/2023 Unplottable Report Site: BNSF Near 4th Street (only info avail) Santa Ana CA Control No: 02-5974 Notified Date: County: Orange County Notified Date Time: Year. 2002 URL: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (as of 1997 to 2005) Contained: Yes Bbls: Substance: Train v Trespasser Cups: Incident Date: 11 /5/200212:00:00 AM Cu Ft: No of Injuries: 1 Gals: No of Fatals: 0 Grams: No of Evacs: 0 Lbs: Cleanup: N/A Liters: Water: No Oz: Water Way: Pts: City: Santa Ana Qts: County: Orange County Sheen: ZIP: Tons: Site: Rail Road Unknown: Admin Agency: Santa Ana Fire Department Location: Near 4th Street (only info avail) Description: Trespasser on the tracks. 11/5/200205:39:45 PM 0 0 0 0.000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site: 4TH ST DOT NUMBER: UNKNOWN SANTA ANNA CA NRC Report No: 431145 Latitude Degrees: Type of Incident: RAILROAD NON -RELEASE Latitude Minutes: Incident Cause: OPERATOR ERROR Latitude Seconds: Incident Date: 04/03/98 20:50:00 Longitude Degrees: Incident Location: Incident Dtg: Distance from City: Distance Units: Direction from City: Location County: Potential Flag: Year: Description of Incident: Calls Information Date Time Received: Date Time Complete: Call Type: Resp Company: Resp Org Type: Incident Information Tank ID: Tank Regulated: Tank Regulated By: Capacity of Tank: Longitude Minutes: OCCURRED Longitude Seconds: Lat Quad: Long Quad: Location Section: ORANGE Location Township: Location Range: Year1998 Reports PASSENGER TRAIN TRAVELING EAST AT 40 MPH STRUCK PERSON AT CROSSING 04/04/98 00:38:28 04/04/98 00:41:46 INC UNKNOWN U erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Responsible City: Responsible State: Responsible Zip: Source: Building ID: Location Area ID: Location Block ID: OCSG No: XX UNAVAILABLE CHMIRS ERNS Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1377 10/3/2023 Capacity Tank Units: OCSP No: Description of Tank: State Lease No: Actual Amount: Pier Dock No: Actual Amount Units: Berth Slip No: Tank Above Ground: ABOVE Brake Failure: NPDES: Airbag Deployed: NPDES Compliance: U Transport Contain: Init Contin Rel No: Location Subdiv: Contin Rel Permit: Platform Rig Name: Contin Release Type: Platform Letter. Aircraft ID: Allision: Aircraft Runway No: Type of Structure: Aircraft Spot No: Structure Name: Aircraft Type: UNKNOWN Structure Oper. Aircraft Model: Transit Bus Flag: Aircraft Fuel Cap: Date Time Norm Serv: Aircraft Fuel Cap U: Sery Disrupt Time: Aircraft Fuel on Brd: Sery Disrupt Units: Aircraft Fuel OB U: CR Begin Date: Aircraft Hanger. CR End Date: Road Mile Marker: CR Change Date: Power Gen Facility: U FBI Contact: Generating Capacity: FBI Contact Dt Tm: Type of FixedObj: UNKNOWN Passenger Handling: Type of Fuel: Passenger Route: DOT Crossing No: Passenger Delay: DOT Regulated: U Sub Part C Test Req: Pipeline Type: UNKNOWN Conductor Test: Pipeline Abv Ground. ABOVE Engineer Test. Pipeline Covered: U Trainman Test: Exposed Underwater. U Yard Foreman Test: Railroad Hotline: No RCL Operator Test: Railroad Milepost. 175.4 Brakeman Test: Grade Crossing: Y Train Dispat Test. Crossing Device Ty: Signalman Test: Ty Vehicle Involved: UNKNOWN Oth Employee Test: Device Operational: Y Unknown Test: Incident Details Information Release Secured. Release Rate: Release Rate Unit: Release Rate Rate: Est Duration of Rel: Desc Remedial Act: Fire Involved: Fire Extinguished. Any Evacuations: No Evacuated: Who Evacuated: Radius of Evacu: Any Injuries: No. Injured: No. Hospitalized: No. Fatalities: Any Fatalities: Any Damages: Damage Amount. Air Corridor Closed: Air Corridor Desc: Air Closure Time: Waterway Closed: Waterway Desc: Waterway Close Time: Road Closed. Road Desc: Road Closure Time: Road Closure Units: Closure Direction: NONE N U N Y 1 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services State Agen Report No: State Agen on Scene: State Agen Notified: Fed Agency Notified: Oth Agency Notified. Body of Water: Tributary of.• Near River Mile Make: Near River Mile Mark: Offshore: Weather Conditions: Air Temperature: Wind Direction: Wind Speed: Wind Speed Unit: Water Supp Contam: Water Temperature: Wave Condition: Current Speed: Current Direction: Current Speed Unit: EMPL Fatality: Pass Fatality: Community Impact: Passengers Transfer: Passenger Injuries: Employee Injuries: Occupant Fatality: Sheen Size: Sheen Size Units: N U N Y XXX XXX XXX 101 U N UNK Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1378 10/3/2023 Major Artery: Track Closed: Track Desc: Track Closure Time: Track Closure Units: Track Close Dir.- Media Interest: Medium Desc: Addl Medium Info: No N RAIL REPORT (N/A) erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Sheen Size Length: Sheen Size Length U: Sheen Size Width: Sheen Size Width U: Sheen Color. Dir of Sheen Travel: Sheen Odor Desc: Duration Unit: Additional Info: CROSSING PROTECTED BY GATES AND FLASHING LIGHTS - WORKING Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1379 10/3/2023 Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public. " Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program: DOE FUSRAP The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from the Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. The DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) established long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) requirements for remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE evaluates the final site conditions of a remediated site on the basis of risk for different future uses. DOE then confirms that LTS&M requirements will maintain protectiveness. Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017 National Priority List: NPL National Priorities List (Superfund)-NPL: EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency) list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 National Priority List - Proposed: PROPOSED NPL Includes sites proposed (by the EPA, the state, or concerned citizens) for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 Deleted NPL: DELETED NPL The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory: SEMS The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985: ODI The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1380 10/3/2023 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites: SEMS ARCHIVE The Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS CERCLIS: Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands: IODI Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned: CERCLIS NFRAP An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens: CERCLIS LIENS A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action. RCRA CORRACTS RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2021 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: RCRA TSD RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non -Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2021 RCRA Generator List: RCRA LQG RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2021 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1381 10/3/2023 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: RCRA SQG RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2021 RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators List: RCRA VSQG RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Additionally, VSQG may not accumulate more than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste at any time. Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2021 RCRA Non -Generators. RCRA NON GEN RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2021 RCRA Sites with Controls: RCRA CONTROLS List of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities with institutional controls in place. RCRA gives the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to control hazardous waste from the "cradle -to -grave." This includes the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA also set forth a framework for the management of non -hazardous solid wastes. The 1986 amendments to RCRA enabled EPA to address environmental problems that could result from underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. Government Publication Date: Nov 17, 2021 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: FED ENG Engineering controls (ECs) encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub -surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs: FED INST Institutional controls are non -engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency ) expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021 Land Use Control Information System: LUCIS The LUCIS database is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Navy and contains information for former Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) properties across the United States. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2006 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS 1982 TO 1986 Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1382 10/3/2023 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS 1987 TO 1989 Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports made available by the United States Coast Guard National Response Center (NRC). The NRC fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. These data contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Government Publication Date: Jul 26, 2021 The Assessment. Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database: FED BROWNFIELDS Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Aug 20, 2021 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA UST The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 Facility Response Plan: FRP List of facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRP) to EPA. Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs). Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 2020 Historical Gas Stations: HIST GAS STATIONS This historic directory of service stations is provided by the Cities Service Company. The directory includes Cities Service filling stations that were located throughout the United States in 1930. Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1930 Petroleum Refineries: REFN List of petroleum refineries from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Refinery Capacity Report. Includes operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new refineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year located in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Survey locations adjusted using public data. Government Publication Date: Jul 10, 2020 Petroleum Product and Crude Oil Rail Terminals: BULK TERMINAL List of petroleum product and crude oil rail terminals made available by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Includes operable bulk petroleum product terminals located in the 50 States and the District of Columbia with a total bulk shell storage capacity of 50,000 barrels or more, and/or the ability to receive volumes from tanker, barge, or pipeline; also rail terminals handling the loading and unloading of crude oil that were active between 2017 and 2018. Petroleum product terminals comes from the EIA-815 Bulk Terminal and Blender Report, which includes working, shell in operation, and shell idle for several major product groupings. Survey locations adjusted using public data. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2020 LIEN on Property SEMS LIEN The EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides LIEN information on properties under the EPA Superfund Program. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1383 10/3/2023 Superfund Decision Documents: SUPERFUND ROD This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Government Publication Date: Jun 28, 2021 State State Response Sites. RESPONSE A list of identified confirmed release sites where the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high -priority and high potential risk. This database is state equivalent NPL. Government Publication Date: Sep 15, 2021 EnviroStor Database: ENVIROSTOR The EnviroStor Data Management System is made available by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Includes Corrective Action sites, Tiered Permit sites, Historical Sites and Evaluation/Investigation sites. This database is state equivalent CERCLIS. Government Publication Date: Sep 15, 2021 Delisted State Response Sites: DELISTED ENVS Sites removed from the list of State Response Sites made available by the EnviroStor Data Management System, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Government Publication Date: Sep 15, 2021 Solid Waste Information System (SWIS): SWF/LF The Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database made available by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) contains information on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the State of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites. Government Publication Date: Nov 2, 2021 Solid Waste Disposal Sites with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels: SWRCB SWF This is a list of solid waste disposal sites identified by California State Water Resources Control Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit. Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2006 EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities: HWP A list of hazardous waste facilities including permitted, post -closure and historical facilities found in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database. Government Publication Date: Sep 15, 2021 Sites Listed in the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program Report: SWAT In a 1993 Memorandum of Understanding, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) agreed to submit a comprehensive report on the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). This report summarizes the work completed to date on the SWAT Program, and addresses both the impacts that leakage from solid waste disposal sites (SWDS) may have upon waters of the State and the actions taken to address such leakage. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1995 Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers: C&D DEBRIS RECY This listing of Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers is maintained by the California Intergrated Waste Management Board -common C&D materials include lumber, drywall, metals, masonry (brick, concrete, etc.), carpet, plastic, pipe, rocks, dirt, paper, cardboard, or green waste related to land development. Government Publication Date: Jun 20, 2018 Recycling Centers: RECYCLING This list of Certified Recycling Centers that are operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Government Publication Date: Nov 2, 2020 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1384 10/3/2023 Listing of Certified Processors: PROCESSORS This list of Certified Processors that are operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Government Publication Date: Oct 27, 2020 Listing of Certified Dropoff. Collection, and Community Service Programs: CONTAINER RECY This list of Certified Dropoff, Collection, and Community Service Programs (non -buyback) operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2020 Land Disposal Sites: LDS Land Disposal Sites in GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s data management system. The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Waste management units include waste piles, surface impoundments, and landfills. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports: LUST List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks within the Cleanup Sites data in GeoTracker database. GeoTracker is the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) data management system for managing sites that impact groundwater, especially those that require groundwater cleanup (Underground Storage Tanks, Department of Defense and Site Cleanup Program) as well as permitted facilities such as operating Underground Storage Tanks. The Leak Prevention Program that overlooks LUST sites is the SWRCB in California's Environmental Protection Agency. Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2021 Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks: DELISTED LST List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) cleanup sites removed from GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s database system, as well as sites removed from the SWRCB's list of UST Case closures. Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2021 Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) in GeoTracker: UST List of Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Oct 17, 2021 Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank Cases: UST CLOSURE List of UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the California Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director that have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. Government Publication Date: May 5, 2021 Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database: HHSS The Historical Hazardous Substance Storage database contains information collected in the 1980s from facilities that stored hazardous substances. The information was originally collected on paper forms, was later transferred to microfiche, and recently indexed as a searchable database. When using this database, please be aware that it is based upon self -reported information submitted by facilities which has not been independently verified. It is unlikely that every facility responded to the survey and the database should not be expected to be a complete inventory of all facilities that were operating at that time. This database is maintained by the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Geotracker. Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2015 Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System: UST SWEEPS The Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS) is a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tanks made available by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Government Publication Date: Oct 1, 1994 Aboveground Storage Tanks: AST A statewide list from 2009 of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) made available by the Cal FIRE Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM). This list is no longer maintained or updated by the Cal FIRE OSFM. Government Publication Date: Aug 31, 2009 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1385 10/3/2023 SWRCB Historical Aboveground Storage Tanks: AST SWRCB A list of aboveground storage tanks made available by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Effective January 1, 2008, the Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPAs) are vested with the responsibility and authority to implement the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA). Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 2007 Oil and Gas Facility Tanks: TANK OIL GAS Locations of oil and gas tanks that fall under the jurisdiction of the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation (CaIGEM) (CCR 1760). CaIGEM was formerly the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR). Government Publication Date: Sep 13, 2021 Delisted Storage Tanks: DELISTED TNK This database contains a list of storage tank sites that were removed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Cal FIRE Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM). Government Publication Date: Oct 27, 2021 California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: CERS TANK List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. The CaIEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials. Government Publication Date: Sep 24, 2021 Delisted California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: DELISTED CTNK This database contains a list of Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank sites that were removed from in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) Regulated Site Portal. Government Publication Date: Sep 24, 2021 Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Container Information - Facility Summa : HIST TANK The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Hazardous Substance Storage Containers listing and inventory in th 1980s. This facility summary lists historic tank sites where the following container types were present: farm motor vehicle fuel tanks; waste tanks; sumps; pits, ponds, lagoons, and others; and all other product tanks. This set, published in May 1988, lists facility and owner information, as well as the number of containers. This data is historic and will not be updated. Government Publication Date: May 27, 1988 Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Land Use Restrictions: LUR The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents land use restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple land use restrictions. Government Publication Date: Sep 15, 2021 CALSITES Database: CALSITES This historical database was maintained by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) for more than a decade. CALSITES contains information on Brownfield properties with confirmed or potential hazardous contamination. In 2006, DTSC introduced EnviroStor as the latest Brownfields site database. Government Publication Date: May 1, 2004 Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed/Land Use Restrictions: HLUR The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Government Publication Date: Feb 18, 2021 Deed Restrictions and Land Use Restrictions: DEED List of Deed Restrictions, Land Use Restrictions and Covenants in GeoTracker made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency. A deed restriction (land use covenant) may be required to facilitate the remediation of past environmental contamination and to protect human health and the environment by reducing the risk of exposure to residual hazardous materials. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1386 10/3/2023 Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 Voluntary Cleanup Program: VCP List of sites in the Voluntary Cleanup Program made available by the Department of Toxic Substances and Control (DTSC). The Voluntary Cleanup Program was designed to respond to lower priority sites. Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, DTSC enters site -specific agreements with project proponents for DTSC oversight of site assessment, investigation, and/or removal or remediation activities, and the project proponents agree to pay DTSC's reasonable costs for those services. Government Publication Date: Sep 15, 2021 GeoTracker Cleanup Program Sites: CLEANUP SITES A list of Cleanup Program sites in the state of California made available by The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). SWRCB tracks leaking underground storage tank cleanups as well as other water board cleanups. Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2021 Delisted County Records: DELISTED COUNTY Records removed from county or CUPA databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds. Government Publication Date: Dec 9, 2021 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Indian Lands: INDIAN LUST LUSTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2020 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on Indian Lands: INDIAN UST USTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2020 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: DELISTED ILST Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Apr 14, 2020 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks: DELISTED IUST Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Apr 14, 2020 County Orange County - Industrial Cleanup Program Cases Listing ICP ORANGE Orange County Health Care Agency's Environmental Health Division has an Industrial Cleanup (IC) program which oversees the voluntary cleanup of contaminated property. This is a list of cases (by city) which the IC program has overseen in the past, or is currently overseeing. Government Publication Date: Jul 9, 2021 Orange County - LOP Lead Cases List: LOP ORANGE The Local Oversight Program of the County of Orange provides regulatory cleanup oversight for cleanup of leaking underground storage tanks (USTs). This dataset is provided by the Orange County Health Care Agency. Government Publication Date: Jul 9, 2021 Orange County - Non -Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cases: NPUT ORANGE This list of open and closed non -petroleum underground storage tank cases is maintained by the Orange County Health Care Agency. Government Publication Date: Oct 8, 2021 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1387 10/3/2023 Orange County - Underground Storage Tanks Listing_ UST ORANGE A list of registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites in Orange County. This list is made available by Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA), Environmental Health Division which oversees the underground storage tank inspection program in most of the cities of Orange County, with the exception of Anaheim, Fullerton, and Orange. Government Publication Date: Jul 9, 2021 Orange County - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Listing_ AST ORANGE A list of Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank (APST) facilities inspected by Orange County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA). This list is made available by the Environmental Health Division of Orange County Health Care Agency. Government Publication Date: Jul 9, 2021 Orange County - Anaheim City UST Cleanup Cases: UST CLP ANAHEIM A list of UST Cleanup Cases in the City of Anaheim in Orange County. As part of its Groundwater Protection Program, the City of Anaheim managed the UST Cleanup Oversight Program from April 1991 to June 2014. This list is published by the City of Anaheim Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Program. Government Publication Date: May 26, 2015 Orange County - Anaheim City UST List: UST ANAHEIM A list of Underground Storage Tanks in Anaheim City, Orange County. This list is made available by Anaheim Fire & Rescue Department. Government Publication Date: Jul 21, 2021 Orange County - Anaheim City AST List: AST ANAHEIM List of Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) in Anaheim City, Orange County made available by Anaheim Fire & Rescue. Government Publication Date: Jul 21, 2021 Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: FINDS/FRS The Facility Registry Service (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites, or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high -quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, and data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. This list is made available by the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Government Publication Date: Nov 2, 2020 Toxics Release Inventory_(TRII Program: TRIS The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U. S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date: Aug 24, 2021 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Releases: PFAS TRI List of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities at which the reported chemical is a Per- or polyfluorinated alkyl substance (PFAS) included in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. Government Publication Date: Aug 24, 2021 PFOA/PFOS Contaminated Sites: PFAS NPL List of sites where PFOA or PFOS contaminants have been found in drinking water or soil. Made available by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Sep 17, 2021 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1388 10/3/2023 SSEHRI PFAS Contamination Sites: PFAS SSEHRI This PFAS Contamination Site Tracker database is compiled by the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute (SSEHRI) at Northeastern University. According to the SSEHRI, the database records qualitative and quantitative data from each known site of PFAS contamination, including timeline of discovery, sources, levels, health impacts, community response, and government response. The goal of this database is to compile information and support public understanding of the rapidly unfolding issue of PFAS contamination. All data presented was extracted from government websites, news articles, or publicly available documents, and this is cited in the tracker. Disclaimer: The source conveys this database undergoes regular updates as new information becomes available, some sites may be missing and/or contain information that is incorrect or outdated, as well as their information represents all contamination sites SSEHRI is aware of, not all possible contamination sites. This data is not intended to be used for legal purposes. Limited location details are available with this data. Access the following for the most current informations https://pfasproject.com/pfas- contamination-site-tr acker/ Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2019 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Water Quality- PFAS WATER The Water Quality Portal (WQP) is a cooperative service sponsored by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council (NWQMC). This listing includes records from the Water Quality Portal where the characteristic (environmental measurement) is in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. Government Publication Date: Jul 20, 2020 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: HMIRS US DOT - Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2020 National Clandestine Drug Labs: NCDL The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: Oct 5, 2020 Toxic Substances Control Act: TSCA The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2019 Hist TSCA: HIST TSCA The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing: FTTS ADMIN An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing FTTS INSP An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1389 10/3/2023 Potentially Responsible Parties List: PRP Early in the cleanup process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties (PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing SCRD DRYCLEANER The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) ICIS The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance (FE&C) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities. These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement. The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits, limits, discharge monitoring data and other program reports. Government Publication Date: Jun 14, 2021 DrvcleanerFacilities: FED DRYCLEANERS A list of drycleaner facilities from Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) online search. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: May 5, 2021 Delisted DrycleanerFacilities: DELISTED FED DRY List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: May 5, 2021 Formerly Used Defense Sites: FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. This list is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Government Publication Date: May 26, 2021 Former Military Nike Missile Sites: FORMER NIKE This information was taken from report DRXTH-AS-IA-83A016 (Historical Overview of the Nike Missile System, 12/1984) which was performed by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. for the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Assessment Division. The Nike system was deployed between 1954 and the mid-1970's. Among the substances used or stored on Nike sites were liquid missile fuel (JP-4); starter fluids (UDKH, aniline, and furfuryl alcohol); oxidizer (IRFNA); hydrocarbons (motor oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, heating oil); solvents (carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane, stoddard solvent); and battery electrolyte. The quantities of material a disposed of and procedures for disposal are not documented in published reports. Virtually all information concerning the potential for contamination at Nike sites is confined to personnel who were assigned to Nike sites. During deactivation most hardware was shipped to depot -level supply points. There were reportedly instances where excess materials were disposed of on or near the site itself at closure. There was reportedly no routine site decontamination. Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 1984 PHMSA Pipeline Safety Flagged Incidents: PIPELINE INCIDENT A list of flagged pipeline incidents made available by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). PHMSA regulations require incident and accident reports for five different pipeline system types. Government Publication Date: Jul 7, 2020 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) MLT6 A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date: May 11, 2021 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1390 10/3/2023 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites: HIST MLTS A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File: MINES The Master Index File (MIF) contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself. Government Publication Date: Nov 2, 2021 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Sites: SMCRA An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of Abandoned Mine Land (AML) impacts, as well as information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Government Publication Date: Dec 18, 2020 Mineral Resource Data System: MRDS The Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world. Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The USGS has ceased systematic updates of the MRDS database with their focus more recently on deposits of critical minerals while providing a well -documented baseline of historical mine locations from USGS topographic maps. Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2006 Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Sites: URANIUM The Legacy Management Office of the Department of Energy (DOE) manages radioactive and chemical waste, environmental contamination, and hazardous material at over 100 sites across the U.S. The L.M. Office manages this database of sites registered under the Uranium Mill Tailings Control Act (UMTRCA). Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017 Alternative Fueling Stations: ALT FUELS List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Propane) stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations, and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) obtains information about new stations from trade media, Clean Cities coordinators, a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website, and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and industry groups. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2021 Registered Pesticide Establishments: SSTS List of active EPA -registered foreign and domestic pesticide -producing and device -producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides, active ingredients, or devices be registered. The list of establishments is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Apr 13, 2021 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers: PCB Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date: Nov 19, 2020 State erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1391 10/3/2023 Dry Cleaning Facilities: DRYCLEANERS A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial, linen supply, commercial laundry, dry cleaning and pressing machines - Coin Operated Laundry and Dry Cleaning. This is provided by the Department of Toxic Substance Control. Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2021 Delisted Drycleaners: DELISTED DRYCLEANERS Sites removed from the list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers, made available by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2021 Non -Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program: DRYC GRANT A list of grant recipients of the Non -Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program made available by the California Air Resources Board (GARB). The program provides grants to eligible dry cleaning businesses to assist them in transitioning away from PERC machines to alternative non -toxic and non -smog forming technologies. Government Publication Date: Feb 28, 2018 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): PFAS List of sites from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s GeoTracker at which one or more of the potential contaminants of concern are in the PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances made available by the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2021 PFOA/PFOS Groundwater. PFAS GW A list of water wells from the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program (LAMA) Groundwater Information System with the groundwater chemical perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (NIL = 0.014 UG/L) or perfluorooctanoic sulfonate (PFOS) (NL = 0.013 UG/L). The GAMA Groundwater Information System search is made available by California Water Boards. Government Publication Date: Oct 22, 2020 Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List- Site Cleanup: HWSS CLEANUP The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. This list is published by California Department of Toxic Substance Control. Government Publication Date: May 20, 2021 List of Hazardous Waste Facilities Subject to Corrective Action: DTSC HWF This is a list of hazardous waste facilities identified in Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 25187.5. These facilities are those where Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has taken or contracted for corrective action because a facility owner/operator has failed to comply with a date for taking corrective action in an order issued under HSC § 25187, or because DTSC determined that immediate corrective action was necessary to abate an imminent or substantial endangerment. Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016 EnviroStor Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement: INSP COMP ENF A list of permitted facilities with inspections and enforcements tracked in the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) EnviroStor. Government Publication Date: Apr 29, 2021 School Property Evaluation Program Sites: SCH A list of sites registered with The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) School Property Evaluation and Cleanup (SPEC) Division. SPEC is responsible for assessing, investigating and cleaning up proposed school sites. The Division ensures that selected properties are free of contamination or, if the properties were previously contaminated, that they have been cleaned up to a level that protects the students and staff who will occupy the new school. Government Publication Date: Sep 15, 2021 California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): CHMIRS A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS). This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES). Government Publication Date: Aug 1, 2021 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1392 10/3/2023 Historical California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): HIST CHMIRS A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) prior to 1993. This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES). Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1993 Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: HAZNET A list of hazardous waste manifests received each year by Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments. Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2016 Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: HIST MANIFEST A list of historic hazardous waste manifests received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) from year the 1980 to 1992. The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1992 DTSC Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters: HW TRANSPORT The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains this list of Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters. Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2020 Registered Waste Tire Haulers: WASTE TIRE This list of registered waste tire haulers is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2020 California Medical Waste Management Program Facility List: MEDICAL WASTE This list of Medical Waste Management Program Facilities is maintained by the California Department of Public Health. The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment, and disposal of medical waste by providing oversight for the implementation of the Medical Waste Management Act (MWMA). The MWMP permits and inspects all medical waste off -site treatment facilities, medical waste transporters, and medical waste transfer stations. This list contains transporters, treatment, and transfer facilities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2020 Historical Cortese List: HIST CORTESE List of sites which were once included on the Cortese list. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements for providing information about the location of hazardous sites. Government Publication Date: Nov 13, 2008 Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders: CDO/CAO The California Environment Protection Agency "Cortese List" of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO). This list contains many CDOs and CAOs that do NOT concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. Many of the listed orders concern, as examples, discharges of domestic sewage, food processing wastes, or sediment that do not contain hazardous materials, but the Water Boards' database does not distinguish between these types of orders. Government Publication Date: Dec 6, 2021 California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: CERS HAZ List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. The CaIEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials. Government Publication Date: Sep 24, 2021 Delisted Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: DELISTED HAZ This database contains a list of sites that were removed from the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) in the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. Government Publication Date: Nov 29, 2018 Sites in GeoTracker: GEOTRACKER erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1393 10/3/2023 GeoTracker is the State Water Resource Control Boards' data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. This is a list of sites in GeoTracker that aren't otherwise categorized as LUST, Land Disposal Sites (LDS), Cleanup Sites, or sites having Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR). This listing includes program types such as Underground Injection Control (UIC), Confined Animal Facilities (CAF), Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program, plans, and non -case information. Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2021 Mines Listing: MINE This list includes mine site locations extracted from the Mines Online database, maintained by the California Department of Conservation. Mines Online (MOL) is an interactive web map designed with GIS features that provide information such as the mine name, mine status, commodity sold, location, and other mine specific data. Please note: Mine location information is provided to assist experts in determining the location of mine operators in accordance with California Civil Code section 1103.4 and reflects information reported by mine operators in annual reports provided under Public Resources Code section 2207. While the Division of Mine Reclamation (DMR) attempts to populate MOL with accurate location information, the DMR cannot guarantee the accuracy of operator reported location information. Government Publication Date: Jan 12, 2021 Recorded Environmental Cleanup Liens: LIEN The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) maintains this list of liens placed upon real properties. A lien is utilized by the DTSC to obtain reimbursement from responsible parties for costs associated with the remediation of contaminated properties. Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020 Waste Discharge Requirements: WASTE DISCHG List of sites in California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program in California, made available by the SWRCB via GeoTracker. The WDR program regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. Government Publication Date: Oct 20, 2021 Toxic Pollutant Emissions Facilities: EMISSIONS A list of criteria and toxic pollutant emissions data for facilities in California made available by the California Environmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board (ARB). Risk data may be based on previous inventory submittals. The toxics data are submitted to the ARB by the local air districts as requirement of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program. This program requires emission inventory updates every four years. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2019 Clandestine Drug Lab Sites: CDL The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a listing of drug lab sites. DTSC is responsible for removal and disposal of hazardous substances discovered by law enforcement officials while investigating illegal/clandestine drug laboratories. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2021 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County Orange County - Hazardous Waste Facilities: HW ORANGE A list of Hazardous Waste Facilities in Orange County. This list is made available by Orange County Environmental Health Department. Government Publication Date: Jul 9, 2021 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1394 10/3/2023 Definitions Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API. Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary' -Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary -Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. Map Key The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of'1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21121600065 City Council 18 — 1395 10/3/2023 APPENDIX B REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS City Council 18 — 1396 10/3/2023 12/29/21, 10:10 AM Weis Environmental Mail - FW: Your Orange County public records request #21-5331 has been closed. Mmai I Brian Brennan <bb@weisenviro.com> FW: Your Orange County public records request #21-5331 has been closed. 1 message Dan Weis <dw@weisenviro.com> Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 4:20 PM To: Brian Brennan <bb@weisenviro.com> From: Orange County Public Records <support@nextrequest.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 3:04 PM To: dw@weisenviro.com Subject: Your Orange County public records request #21-5331 has been closed. -- Attach a non -image file and/or reply ABOVE THIS LINE with a message, and it will be sent to staff on this request. -- Orange County Public Records Record request #21-5331 has been closed. The closure reason supplied was: No responsive records. Response has been made in accordance with the California Public Records Act. View Request 21-5331 https://orangecounty.nextrequest.com/requests/21-5331 C ty Council 18 — 1397 10/3/20 3 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/l/?ik=al 30482bd8&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1719799740605422560%7Cmsg-f%3A1719799740605... 1 /2 12/29/21, 10:10 AM Weis Environmental Mail - FW: Your Orange County public records request #21-5331 has been closed. POWERED BY NEXTREQUEST The All in One Records Requests Platform Questions about your request? Reply to this email or sign in to contact staff at Orange County. Technical support: See our help page City Council 18 — 1398 10/3/2023 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1 /?ik=al 30482bd8&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1719799740605422560%7Cmsg-f%3A1719799740605... 2/2 Department of Toxic Substances Control : -� Jared Blumenfeld Secretary for Environmental Protection December 22, 2021 Brian Brenna Weis bb@weisenviro.com Meredith Williams, Acting Director 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress, California 90630 Gavin Newsom Governor PR4-122021-06 515 & 525 Cabrillo Park Dr., & 1901 & 1971 East 4t" St., Santa Ana & 400-051-14, -15, - 09 & -02 Dear Requestor: On December 20, 2021, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received your email of December 20, 2021, requesting records under the Public Records Act. After a thorough review of our files, no site records were found pertaining to the sites/facilities referenced above. DTSC Generator information: DTSC Cypress Office does not house Generator/HWTS Records. DTSC's Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) may have records that pertain to this request. This unit tracks toxic waste generators, transporters (manifests), and disposal facilities. If you are interested in this type of information, it can be identified by accessing the HWTS database at http://hwts.dtsc.ca.gov. If you are interested in retrieving detailed reports, additional charges may apply. Please contact the HWTS unit by email at hwtsreports(ab_dtsc.ca.gov or by phone at (800) 618-6942 for further information. For copies of manifests, please send an email to mcr(a)dtsc.ca.gov. A large number of our records are available on EnviroStor, an online database that provides non - confidential, public access to DTSCs data management system. It tracks our cleanup, permitting, enforcement, and investigation efforts at hazardous waste facilities and sites with known or suspected contamination issues. EnviroStor is available 24/7, 365 days a year. The data reflects the latest updates as they are entered in the system. Access it from your computer or smartphone, the local library — anywhere Internet access is available. Just go to www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov. You'll find a step-by-step tour of EnviroStor under the "How to Use EnviroStor" menu on the website. If you have any questions, would like further information regarding your request, please contact me, via email at jone.barrio(a�dtsc.ca.gov Sincerely, Jo-v%,e. r3a4-ri, Jone Barrio Regional Records Coordinator City Council 18 — 1399 10/3/2023 ® Printed on Recycled Paper 12/29/21, 10:09 AM Weis Environmental Mail - RE: Public Records Request / SARWQCB / Santa Ana / 21-12-002 mai I Brian Brennan <bb@weisenviro.com> RE: Public Records Request / SARWQCB / Santa Ana / 21-12-002 1 message WB-RB8-FileReview8 <FileReview8@waterboards.ca.gov> Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:48 PM To: Brian Brennan <bb@weisenviro.com> Good morning, After careful review of our records, we show we have no files for the following site(s): 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive and 1971 East 4th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 and 92705 Unfortunately, we do not use APN numbers or cross streets to maintain our files. We only use facility names and/or physical address numbers to locate files. If you can provide a numerical address or facility name, we can carry out your request. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us again. Thank you, File Review Desk 3737 Main St. Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501 From: Brian Brennan <bb@weisenviro.com> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 7:05 AM To: WB-RB8-FileReview8 <FileReview8@waterboards.ca.gov> Cc: Daniel Weis <dw@weisenviro.com> Subject: Public Records Request / SARWQCB / Santa Ana / 21-12-002 EXTERNAL: Hello, This firm is completing a Phase I ESA on the following subject property: Address: 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, and 1901 and 1971 East 4th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 and 92705 APNs: 400,8ftY1551-15, 400-051-09, and 400-051-02 18 - 1400 10/3/2023 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/l/?ik=al 30482bd8&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-8074894629143833305%7Cmsg-f%3A17196958112... 1 /2 12/29/21, 10:09 AM Weis Environmental Mail - RE: Public Records Request / SARWQCB / Santa Ana / 21-12-002 We are requesting any records associated with the subject property. Best Regards, Daniel A. Weis, R.E.H.S. Environmental Manager Weis Environmental LLC 1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116 Carlsbad, CA 92008 dw@weisenviro.com 760.585.7070 (Office) 760.672.6338 (Mobile) www.weisenviro.com City Council 18 — 1401 10/3/2023 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/l/?ik=al 30482bd8&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-8074894629143833305%7Cmsg-f%3A17196958112... 2/2 APPENDIX C HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Council 18 — 1402 10/3/2023 Ati,= '�"._ • "`+•� ,_-..� ". .mil- y. 4 - •= 10 iv 4 � }■�y .. ��,� n •�� � . • �� _� � I "'yaw -�° �-` - - ! , --- �y� iy �'' •1 . _ .:�• n. '- � - -r r'- _41- 7 t_ ��'_.-i gym.' a.. - e ar. } -•'f-. ,. �4 •I� { lAt or yy . f - ! ~s• Imo. �. K�' ti � •�' -Y i �;�* :�� r� -. F�� � , / � - F`� 'j ..- � - - .z �.... _ . - � - �� ..� - •ram �•�� .. �. � w o ,Y � �- •` �- . - - ,� - - - .K�= �r �" � J, -- ft 4L AE •! �����. Y,�■�FL AQ Ir s f ! Ail - INQUIRY . • Nr + YEAR! 2016 �:'. CiN Cou(VEDR 500, 7 —+--• � sue= ■ i"v+ { ' }. Jw �� • r y � � ate. � .. � � ..R .. � - ! -■ low?- r •-. _ lit. i4o', -1 Tli- MR�� I •J � •.yi; s � -NMI INQUIRY 6534209.8 YEAR: 20nr; N .... � � . ■ram. � � ; -� � _ � �� 1 i tee* �� � i• ,�'• � �`---� ' � t �! �. �� r ` T Zoo 'o �-. • r�� r. 4�i,;� t ., �i .�A•- - � � �,• �+ _ + � s ..^ 'lam : t - ' i•' - � ti It r oil r■1 3 �[1 �TF+ - T _`wy.w�F + �� • �1 ��a . �_'}�� .� r fir' •,r •�-' , � I'�' �.rr� F �- .r i qv P'll V v I s ■ ! s AV Ilk vt - r ".�). ,'{R'f 'Z .' is �. .. r ip jre Ago � r •� r o ' • F' • � •.rylTtAj ..� � � . _ i � x i ' two as � ir,.i � .r S s �a .r s • , rw � •�.� -ti • I Fog �j, • C — _ if �, i ) �Y'. r �Zvi s r ■4 + f - r '• t - a j 1 INQUIRY M 6534209.8 YEAR: iggs i N Ito City500ouEoR' 18 - 1408 10/3/2023 �PIP _� * 41 Awl # �' ,t � _•---_.....' +�,: 'ice _� �,•�` �:.r,-..�—�.:. ]. .. , '� � a - _ Imo.+.-�. _ _ •f _ -: � 4 � .. � �•••'+ FIR '7 A I t . 4 11 41- v A. r . Ftl- 4V ti �. 11r-!'T� f - •-.T1F t�+ . • 1T C - r ,.ter. r --��-- _ _ . -. _. ,..r r �►�.•r� - ,� .+ ir At r T �J!� lx.. �!`r� "' v {{ "!'.'!"'ter � 4 + i � `-` �� 1..' � •�'�' -� ?. . FOR. is ah�,r+,:� ; k� y .ter—•.. r�._�� � . .'�� —" t� -: r _ _ -. .. i, . . t �ti ++-.4 �' ;-.ram' •"i r.'"�.�. �,�;, , - f . rr i� �{" _ jf�`• � � +; ti rIz 18 — 1411 '00 10/3/2023 " tam Al 7�F Ti -,a- C GMSMAN -.. F INQUIRY k 6534209.8 /� YEAR: 1966 1 N= 18-1414 10/3/2023 City5oCo ,o u ..EDR V Me. �� 9,11a 1 1ti' ..-1 ='"•e .;fit. ! ,.1� �r, i' 7 0 i 7 Ifs ,T y ■e A 1 INQUIRY k 6534209.8 i . YEAR: A City500ou �pR 1 !'� 18— 1415 ', ••.�• 10/3/2023 _ 1 1 R ' N ." INQUIRY #: 6534209.8 YEAR: 1952 Njur F Cit Cou EDR 18 — 1416 • 'f 0/3/2023 - 500 13 OMw. i. i��.ir::L:.1�.r: •t:t';::•Zr:•'riC: 4:1:':tG:'I .M.iH. �"� ; s =:� ;;' is n „ ._.w-M• . tt ko T� r" "..� i 11 1{j} 1r �s{11rr f f1 , I TZ, 16, "TO ���S'f; Er; 1,. }17#t�l•, i, {f `{��!.� �`�' lfl r'j�1 i;� ;{�j; 3f71'Yi���• � a `' ,�; i`•`` '� 1A it :if: I �e... 1 ITun ear' � ,I.. � � t:sy:� . =�' '�'.: 1j.� j rjs� i�i; s•�i�i,s °• '- ow }�1,;+' ,. +.Y��1� �• ..' tiS,#� �;�t�' •! is ;,: ti l! 1� 140 1il ` � �: mot• �+M�1�►7+�3!M��w�!�`! r�' h � ..+w i }}7 11,y i! 11 .. .......... r 1.a:: .ott. - - -- OEM' Historical Topo Map 20 d —� r ❑ q ❑ - SANTA ❑ ❑ D 9 0 ❑�8 � ain�t ��3ohns-Cem �s] ANA❑ o�a C�❑�I—i� FFairhanv n� opo WQO, Na o pill i mia.}IP-a�rk�❑�a�� Q ` rAnB❑Cem z ❑ F❑ ra `c❑--,a-ap ayEI�LJ E 15TN ST s�� ❑ ¢ ILI ❑� £ 15TH ST F 14ry sr y 4TN S 0 ST 111111C017MIN E FDINGFR AVE ❑❑1 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Tustin, 2012, 7.5-minute N, Orange, 2012, 7.5-minute Council u �g�-NFV L'� ❑ z RAINIER OA _ ❑� a - r m h q ❑ iFAEwooDEN 9 ce 9 I � �w�! II Il�llfl VANpENeERG tN j❑U�1�I0 ❑ -11 a1 U zl h 61GF1bW PARKI IN Qll � � �© :>1 11 Q 1 ❑ �C 1 �❑❑Q rNFOQORA 0R�1 � O YEN'TA-WAp ❑❑ W �� IR�VINEBIVp ❑❑ P°�❑ v y ❑CMI❑ N ST A❑❑❑Marty 6❑W.i6T❑ EBTHSTI 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 18 — 1419 10/3/2023 N 6534209 - 4 page 7 CEDW Historical Topo Map g� a S 7 �M 197]00 v - - - ti _ T' - z 1 0rl -� +a• c- i I 4•' sc F� lJohltaQ z`a 3 7 �Jl 1�3 t rs e a} 15 sr �0 O I� _ — �� - _- /��— Boa \ L J o •� r—T� JjUG� o rft" k ® r C �'�� Ki:• b W AN LA A If11 2 � . f .C,'2 i -- 186 AK U 8 h M 163 } 1 19l7. l - 1 1' �I I- 2 --- !• :z 2 AVE .'�_ -- � � 11T•i - .,hy�r, - _ )� 4`nf1�Jrl, -- -- `--- -.. P�� si 67K • \. 1 • �• 4lA hIE • 1 8M1 167 ' ■* ■ r .: ;• l4TH-•�6�.F, .. j It _ —7SO J 7 0 o wA x e MI �I r�III I _i` --A 5 AVE i y r.. W I 4 1 i; �1 ' 87 ELO P K — Mf u lY . R di ❑��P 8� b BM - L -8M 9 - lJ -5�- ye I i-4 T . 2 - - h III '1I� s 14 at •• � LJ `So 1 ■■ I L N9 Div+' - - ..- C—:❑l—]LJL—I� _ _ 5ch• e-- ■ f-5 'S ° Z, �kS'ih"` }r, T h1L�'❑L"' 25 'd ¢—Jh n ui rIr :� Ia0 L �' �■ f, .. - I �_ _ 0 Y •'� y r�l ~i' o`ev 11 a' 128- 1 -1 •1 •I / 20act J �' ' �' �t___EM zo - �, q hP°pe in• IF StdeaYii� I rT• co bee�- J_�-Fine _c } ®sr rrr x . .L • a A, �"il 7 �ner r .. 11axl1t Ifll r IIr I �TH q sr Lam /rtf �ST �I07 rI��fl�fk- 11 s 7F z a n 1 WI' cc ill ":i�l 3 1 Pa�N~ •\ o-p `��h- _. kjj BE t G �� Io � p j FADD ��rl■il: Iwo - 0 � ' • --;own MEN r '�Tii . _ _ ....'I . 'I - 1 1 ■ �:' A I {�P} StIceciliaa ,son C.a1 t■ !I. i j■ 'r _ I! i h� PF' Sch `1 • •��� Vf, k !�■�� ���� ■ i� 8M 1�� J� .r'�%' ��1 �, al• ♦�. Fill 121 ■�, .� This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Tustin, 1981, 7.5-minute N, Orange, 1981, 7.5-minute Council 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 11 18 — 1420 10/3/2023 N 6534209 - 4 page 8 ZEDW Historical Topo Map 1972 _`AGO '9N 197 • o �=1� � 7 Do 1fdcS w! ,: I „ St Jahns �i.! a v -Cem -� 3 �• {a 1 b+1-- tiRovE.'-*oNrpq _ 1 - ----- I 199 57 sT 1II z �� JJ zc f tl w r, Ewopn RooP' I of o SanTa A n o Cer-t'HOUF4Y RY1 a q I ! I- k- l� - F ".'ISANTA CLARA• AVE' • _ ry pi w. NTA CLAF'q - AVE _I'' I� y, , '', il' z - '.� ri• (96 S_ __.--__ 11 $, AVE r M 163 > 1 `+_ 111 F t JI A 'I m • Hw .r q. I _I7 w v ra ra uroA z , ; iirlrrfll���111111111 q ��iJJ� ¢_ \ b AVE Q N .— ` — 1.4iIntF. II I -EN F� f �-Ql A - ,V li �'9_�''Sr ,°n •Z-l��i, r•e 2 � I I � - �' U � is i �. �. h Y� �ail_ IA A N �IIIh1. . _„:;.; I_ r _ IIJ �riM 5i ■ . Mr �. •Rnn' :I i Tipp F,N B J �r ■ �,n #t'A E 1 P _ Z ■ ■r• ■ i57 ! 7 l7TH ,■i(�i J I'0 r.gC?` ,c��ytF � 2 2 ..xl � i ---■ N Il, N-„PE rI� Y __ I f' 1 J i I �•.diVaer Tan I4. F 60 tT 4 �WASNINGTON - jlll tll�i�. I n j •- x0 AVE N(Nl3TUN AVE yl J n J 31 - �_ 2 4NQy� ~ EIGELOV' PARK -Orrt fTlunlYY ro1., R2dl�{ Cf ° 2/60 _ --J .,'i AVE w z r Hoy E �s p� `\ .�.lK. MS)' J r g 9 •.;-i.—��-oR - Fq X� O 4 U p\ r llian�B141 6M,1 9 iRU(r o .5 f55 LY> -e! Nn rl, rr+TVB� .� N ,. W St Joye't7 S Sch BN1 J A.Z. �S _ - '- r r I _ B F U�'\ �. jSah�-ey Try S7 S ! r•�.. �y� f�Lrk y K e s111 �iii IJ ulumtroa 1'; _ -• L'uluu hu. rig( l I f S i fv— ll� 2Lf` jLv� L�lIL��{J Jo tl uir — `�* — — ,r `. —i 1 r 7t. 1 VQ.,�b 0It J. 1134.' Y.J 1'U'}�f heal �� 'I p'■ II' _ n 1• ,- �IR 120 1�■11 + ,�,Fi 1 J r• �I IPO INN. rL LST �, �`, 1 I C �r .3i ,mnt•uunxc _ - i. i, i" _ • f �',�. lente•- �t crr srN t \■ r 1 - r 'T .7 a/- -�I�l■ � `—_mTrT., 1�T�T�Yz •/ 1 �, f ll-..� I .11 l • � y MAIN ,T ST 1 V S 1 i Q \ �5'F �., L �— `�� r11 �9T Q Ell] ■ t _• �' _�� �_J _7 s nPP rg .r. < SANTA AN - 1 1-11 W-i� 1' - + rater ,fit w �L 16 ■L h Q Q fM. �1�!L,. �..' 120 Y +� J', Nam. c, ✓ \3 4. i � I c rAonEiv � 1 1-• �•�Avc _ 13 09 r1° 99 v *• lti ��10] `�\ i / �♦ ESE 11 �-1. W ■ A6 j �i vy , -?� r15 ;�6 `3'a�^�•�, � ♦r ch i�� - M�a: ..-;•■�Y� ��■ ;.�Ir � ' � �\✓ip�f:/.�i2 V �� •1�. 1�`� - YE 71 =`T J Fa +=• - . � +� a k 2' RM`) �v%' III-/d�� � i /♦ 4 I• �� ■■ This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE Tustin, 1972, 7.5-minute N, Orange, 1972, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec l� -N� page 9 Council 18 — 1421 10/3/2023 6534209 - 4 ZEDW Historical Topo Map 1964. 19611 6 IN a y r�-A ROTEMONrl c( Q❑❑❑i57IN R P_ _ -2 �I�I OILI �SantaAicemSANTA ��� VE' •'�_-` - I AN LA A _ j, 2� a�St.. Z '_ 186 .� AVE Ivey BM 163 3. oY. i _I 111 ti 1-,'-- 1 w �1 W I V ✓ I mvE Q = ` _ q n UiCE ` LN 4. C, �. z E Sierr 1 •� I' C . j . y O � Se 1�'-O i role Lama vI4A , 'SYREET 11 M'15lEll�■4•LANE• 1@M r3M;,; 3M 17 Z • 67 •Z: •.� 17 H 152. Eq at Tan I CFI BOO wA9Ml orON' '. vi O W Av. 210VLOW A E a j{CIL ( M S 1 J O - I7.`1 : •. ' N [- n� . (0. NORWO 1Px Q �,. � J i CI , a � � ' cldilScl,�BM BM'149 FRUIT_J'J'S7illjli •ST �m YI rNE0QQR DR WI B j 14] T _ _ _ _— _ _ — to ,,d� NORTNI _ .� 1, rUST,W- aNNE 6TN stiri [ ,-i - �• _, j Srhve 1�y . -..._ _ �� "• i �� I9ehuk y ' i'nl �,6s�s' ti✓--J a �� Son ui1LL I° ..4Trl ST �- - IO O r ♦ .1.� ' a�l. I C h�, I:� � x. -- _ FIRST IN t' ST i 1 L 3r L�:�❑❑lLJi tit Jf� ,sa sT - 4. ❑Cff 'TN T ❑ �� AVT 'IEL ILI . �1 �. B q•� r �ISch �'❑� uI�L r, \. sT —� N- MAlN �FUT-N,y �vlr— 1107 ��. ..� Li -1 u) In fk II�S,«ch RLY 10 1-0 WC FA L IKP 105 ILL 99 w it mow'. ! ■ w�i G � . � - _ rQ.. a Q `� �_ -III ry Z { O�� •i ~ nk 4x Wkh■ well hixtlfvon 3rh -�' 88 I � i-. •® •1,,�, �/ r ison I �' 0 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Tustin, 1965, 7.5-minute N, Orange, 1964, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec lI Council 18 - 1422 10/3/2023 N. 6534209 - 4 page 10 CEDW Historical Topo Map g'r ' 2 de0 a haven ;St D6 - - Johns :cam Li I � BM 169 Q 000 OQ� ❑❑(] nta Ana ,Cem o ] � Ala VE 192 • BANTA . • C7dC1 CLARA 189 AVE 187 •f� , ' V _,` I Y ' 5f89 . it wHoover , / !f Sch 0 BM 147 4 . ¢ a v a � r R 0 ' EAST- • 17 TH ST TA ANA EM 156 o •!s5• 172 171• .. "� • 1a0 ' 1 z > w •� a i C ni l ■ H ! f� i FRUIT p v ST• 1ss Q �^ yVj p4j . a 2 ' 15.1 55 143 q INN ■i#.1 ■��:■■ MMI ■ 100 11 i ' � I _.tom i-• This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Tustin, 1950, 7.5-minute N, Orange, 1950, 7.5-minute Council 18 - 1423 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 10/3/2023 IN 6534209 - 4 page 11 00R, Historical Topo Map 1948. 19z 206 - R08 . ri i• Ce 0 St Johns B M 169 1nr ] ❑01-1 nta Ana II I� •` }{}I ❑❑❑ Cem p W i ❑❑❑ Q i n ' raz o00 r8s rar �, _-_ VE j .'-.Q 9ANTA••• CL frp . AVE , - .!89 V w Hoover Sch r✓ p ,II BM 147 o v oIL EAST. -° 17 TH ST TA ANA BM 156 •!65• 172 - 171• Z6C ` - •z ti W j w { kBM ate = • o - Mr TO ll nityl• • -- - J� H a }{ - N� FRUfT 8 St 156 9 r53 W O / > % I. ' '� 143 • � ', o Q. Q. DUU❑ ❑ - I € - II ❑❑ � .- � i J n nir Seta __ $ • �� � „ j ��. ' �� 1 Q. . �' ~yam ii `• !f. It ii' �, I FIRST T 101 — N II 'll LJL �, Ta ks - - -� TustinBM 1 'T UT - AVE t n 12 - '• • _ in � n ---�-• l' 5 _ e II I25 18 °1 BM 17Hi p - �r \fig • -- '•� •' - � - � Tustiiy_ ' •• U - `• I / I ' .......... I-�--------- - 21 La m Bg - �� `ti �. BM sa ,yti / This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Tustin, 1948, 7.5-minute N, Orange, 1949, 7.5-minute Council 18 — 1424 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 10/3/2023 N. 6534209 - 4 page 12 OEDW Historical Topo Map 194 li�,r, ,, h',�b"'M Milli TT N • � ICIilk 9-11 I tr, 1 0101610101 ..� AIR *UUMI I■TTi�ii�i�l�. 1 w�•r�w�ws�n• �� Ir aw■�■■ sl ■■�i/�■■■■ I�F1�■ 1w1�%VVP� WIN of rr� •• This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, SANTA ANA, 1942, 15-minute N, ANAHEIM, 1942, 15-minute Council 18 — 1425 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 10/3/2023 N 6534209 - 4 page 13 CEDW Historical Topo Map 1935 +� 1 l ;1 7- joh ' to It 70 • I Z ° ■ ` • 6M 170 ■ ` I I I 1 lljf A p \ _ r 1 182 i / 311-9 • /� i � � �'! 1. !ld ■ II II a � �__ f' Z 1 • • • 1 M 41 . - • �7 ■ g• E 7 \ y TE£NTM STR ■ 5 1 .77 `. M 1:I ` / • f ■ 147 I1 153 \ rao AF! •i i/ ® ��I _ � £ZsT' _ F ST 101 II ST u / w if i� .II II II II it II • ` ll• u• Z25 II ll I� u �i I' �• • „5� lS� -� ,y G •• y _10 M 133 1T oil .�• i " i Schoo 93 MC FADDE /D STREET • �� �'s /04 �_ _ ,■� 10 14 so • may, sa V 't This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Tustin, 1935, 7.5-minute N, Orange, 1935, 7.5-minute Council 1 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 18 — 1426 10/3/2023 6534209 - 4 page 14 OEDW Historical Topo Map 19 .w Q S • \ a " n • • ` BM ` ? 1 S Q J too 6• ' 162 raJ' 8 rB9 � jr—,- Jib • r . i T Tr 4 F_AS SFYE `T � - _ 4i"�' _.� it • s r - i 1148 •i lii" 4 = = ifo — ��� •' ' f_-, �i`r-- �,--' ' ' rRSf •STREE � I - . � ,��� � r � SrAEET 1. Jill I' I /25 '' L •� to •' • �' r •� A N IVA TU B M 133> \ J 1 s-ql U• "ron k M ' h Sch M.CFAD Li TREE mod— < f This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Tustin, 1932, 7.5-minute N, Orange, 1932, 7.5-minute Council 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 18 — 1427 10/3/2023 N 6534209 - 4 page 15 OEDW Historical Topo Map 1 gC This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Corona, 1902, 30-minute Council 18 — 1428 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 10/3/2023 IN 6534209 - 4 page 16 OEDW Historical Topo Map 190 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Santa Ana, 1901, 15-minute N, Anaheim, 1901, 15-minute Council 18 — 1429 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 10/3/2023 IN 6534209 - 4 page 17 OEDW Historical Topo Map 1 8c w • • 0 • rou ■ • • w • • • • Pr ANA • w This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE N, Anaheim, 1898, 15-minute Council 18 — 1430 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 10/3/2023 IN 6534209 - 4 page 18 OEDW Historical Topo Map 181 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Santa Ana, 1896, 15-minute N, Anaheim, 1896, 15-minute Council 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: 1901 East 4th Street ADDRESS: 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 CLIENT: Stantec 1 18 — 1431 10/3/2023 N 6534209 - 4 page 19 Certified Sanborn® Map Report 06/11/21 Site Name: 1901 East 4th Street 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 EDR Inquiry # 6534209.3 Client Name: Stantec 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 Contact: Alicia Jansen Cr� The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Stantec were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Certification # E8A0-4682-BF76 PO # NA Project NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Certification #: E8A0-4682-BF76 The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: ✓ Library of Congress ✓ University Publications of America ✓ EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866T" Stantec (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. City Council 18 — 1432 10/3/2023 6534209 - 3 page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2014. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property. A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. Data by infoUSA CapyrighM2408 All Rights Reserved RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Source TP Adjoining TextAbstract Source Image 2014 Cole Information Services X X X - 2009 Cole Information Services X X X - 2004 Cole Information Services X X X - 2002 Haines Company - X X - Haines Company X X X - 2001 Pacific Telephone - - - - 1999 Cole Information Services X X X - 1997 Pacific Telephone - - - - 1995 Pacific Bell - X X - Pacific Bell X X X - 1994 Cole Information Services X X X - 1992 Pacific Bell - - - - FF'1agna- F pa�� City Council 18 — 1433 10/3/2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Year Source TP Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 1991 Pacific Bell - X X - Pacific Bell X X X - 1986 Pacific Bell - X X - Pacific Bell X X X - 1980 Pacific Telephone - X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1975 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. - X X - Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. X X X - 1971 Luskey Brothers Co., Inc. - - - - 1970 General Telephone Co., of California - X X - 1966 Pacific Telephone - X X - 1965 Luskey Brothers - - - - 1961 Luskey Brothers & Co., - - - - 1960 Luskey Brothers & Co., - X X - 1956 Luskey Brothers - X X - 1955 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. - X X - 1952 Luskeys Directory Service Co. - - - - 1950 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. - X X - 1946 Southern California Telephone Co. - X X - 1945 McCutcheon & Bragonier - - - - 1941 Southern California Telephone Co. - X X - 1936 Western Directory Co. - X X - 1930 Western Directory Co. - X X - 1926 Pacific Telephone - - - - 1925 Western Directory Co. - X X - 1922 Kaasen Directory Co. - - - - 1921 Western Directory Co. - - - - 1920 Santa Ana Directory Co. - - - - FF'1agna- F pages City Council 18 - 1434 10/3/2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SELECTED ADDRESSES The following addresses were selected by the client, for EDR to research. An "X" indicates where information was identified. Address Tvae Findings 1971 East 4th Street Client Entered X 515 Cabrillo Park Drive Client Entered X 525 Cabrillo Park Drive Client Entered X City Council 18 — 1435 10/3/2023 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1901 East 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 FINDINGS DETAIL Target Property research detail. CABRILLO PARK 515 CABRILLO PARK Year Uses Source 1995 JGF Insurance Services Pacific Bell CABRILLO PARK DR 515 CABRILLO PARK DR Year Uses Source 2014 BARNES ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION Cole Information Services BOYD & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE Cole Information Services COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES INC Cole Information Services ONE CARE MEDICAL CENTER Cole Information Services REGAIN INC Cole Information Services WALL MCCORMICK & BAROLDI Cole Information Services 2009 ALDEX AMERICA Cole Information Services BARNES ACCOUNTANCY CORP Cole Information Services BARTON PROTECTIVE SERVICES INC Cole Information Services C & A HEALTH SERVICES INC Cole Information Services CASINO CAPITAL Cole Information Services CONSTANCE K WIGOD Cole Information Services CPA BARNES ROBERT K BARNES Cole Information Services EXCEL PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICES Cole Information Services MAN DEV INC Cole Information Services MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT Cole Information Services ASSOCIATES OBRYAN INVESTMENT CO IA CAL Cole Information Services ORION CAPITAL FINANCE Cole Information Services POINT ONE MORTGAGE INC Cole Information Services PRECISION LENDING GROUP INC Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 Page 2 City Council 18 — 1436 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 RAY RAUGUST Cole Information Services REGAIN DISABILITY MANAGEMENT Cole Information Services SERVICE REGAIN INC Cole Information Services WALL MCCORMICK & BAROLDI Cole Information Services WORLDCOM COMPUTERS INC Cole Information Services 2004 CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION CO Cole Information Services CONSTANCE WIGOD Cole Information Services CONSTRUCTION INDSTRY TCHNLGY INC Cole Information Services EXCEL PHYSICAL & AQTC THRPY Cole Information Services IVONNE DUQUE Cole Information Services MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ASSOCS Cole Information Services MORTEZA GOODARZI Cole Information Services ORANGE CNTY CHILD ABUSE PRVNTN Cole Information Services RAUGUST RAY CPA Cole Information Services RAY RAUGUST Cole Information Services REGAIN Cole Information Services VINCENT GOODWIN Cole Information Services VINCENT L GOODWIN Cole Information Services 1999 ADVANCED FINANCIAL CONCEPTS Cole Information Services ADVANCED FINANCIAL STRATEGIES Cole Information Services GROUP BAROLDI ANTHONY C ATTORNEY Cole Information Services BEYER KIMBERLY L ATTORNEY Cole Information Services CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY Cole Information Services TECHNOLOGIES DARGAN SURINDER K MD Cole Information Services EXCEL THERAPY & SPORTS Cole Information Services REHABILITATION SERVICES FLORES ROBERTO PHD Cole Information Services GOODWIN VINCENT L ATTORNEY Cole Information Services GREEN CATHERINE C ATTORNEY Cole Information Services HOLLOBAUGH ELLEN T ATTORNEY Cole Information Services INSIGNIA COMMERCIAL GROUP Cole Information Services LAKEWAY HEALTH CENTER Cole Information Services MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT Cole Information Services ASSOCIATES MCCORMICK WILLIAM A ATTORNEY Cole Information Services METRO CENTRE Cole Information Services MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Cole Information Services 6534209-5 Page 3 City Council 18 — 1437 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 NATIONAL MANAGEMENT Cole Information Services OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION Cole Information Services PHYSICAL THERAPY & SPORTS Cole Information Services REHABILITATION SERVICES PRESIDIUM INCORPORATED Cole Information Services RAY RAUGUST Cole Information Services REGAIN Cole Information Services ROYAL ALLIANCE ROB EBERT Cole Information Services SANTA ANA TUSTIN PHYSICAL THERAPY Cole Information Services & SPORTS REHAB SERVICES TOWN CENTER PLAZA Cole Information Services UNDERWOOD CHARLES CPA Cole Information Services UNITED SERVICE NETWORK Cole Information Services WALL MCCORMICK & BAROLDI Cole Information Services WOODWARD ALPERT & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services X SOURCE Cole Information Services 1995 Advanced Financal Concepts Pacific Bell Advanced Infusion Therapy Pacific Bell Baroldi Anthony C atty Pacific Bell Beyer Kimberly L atty Pacific Bell C P A Forum Pacific Bell Construction Industry Technology Pacific Bell Green Catherine C atty Pacific Bell Hollobaugh Ellen T atty Pacific Bell Hotel Employees Restaurant Employees Pacific Bell HERE Local 681 JGF Insurance Services Pacific Bell Lakeway Health Center Pacific Bell Mc Cormick William A atty Pacific Bell Midas International Corp Pacific Bell Regain Pacific Bell Royal Alliance Associates Pacific Bell Underwood Chas CPA Pacific Bell United Service Network Pacific Bell Wall Martin J atty Pacific Bell Wall Mc Cormick & Baroldi Pacific Bell Woodward Alpert & Associates Pacific Bell 1994 ADVANCED FINANCIAL CONCEPTS Cole Information Services BAROLDI, ANTHONY C Cole Information Services BEYER, K L Cole Information Services 6534209-5 Page 4 City Council 18 — 1438 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1994 BILLINGS, ERIC K Cole Information Services HOLLOBAUGH, ELLEN T Cole Information Services HOTEL EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL Cole Information Services IRVINE THERAPY MNG Cole Information Services LINEBERGER, JEANNIE E Cole Information Services MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORP Cole Information Services NURSING SERVS INTL Cole Information Services RIEDEN INS AGENCY Cole Information Services SHAW, P Cole Information Services THIES, HELEN S Cole Information Services UNITED SERVICE NETWORK Cole Information Services 1991 Baroldi Anthony C atty Pacific Bell Billings Eric K Pacific Bell BILLINGS RICHARD Hatty Pacific Bell Davis N C Associates Pacific Bell Foremark Technologies Inc Pacific Bell Foremaster Errol M Pacific Bell Hollobaugh Ellen T Pacific Bell Irvine Therapy Management Associates Inc Pacific Bell J Michael & Associates Pacific Bell J Mitchell Steamers Cleaners Pacific Bell LANDAUER ASSOCIATES INC Pacific Bell Lmeberger Jeannie E Pacific Bell Martin & Robinson CPA Pacific Bell Medical Diagnostics Inc Pacific Bell Medical Dictation Service Pacific Bell Medicus Medical Group Pacific Bell Mona Robinson Contadora Publica Pacific Bell Certificada Monacell Mark Pacific Bell NSI Suite Specialists Pacific Bell NSISERVICESINC Pacific Bell Nursing Services Internatl Pacific Bell Santa Ana Tustin Rehabilitation Center Pacific Bell Shaw Patricia Pacific Bell Thies Helen S Pacific Bell Tinlin Catherine C atty Pacific Bell Wall Martin J atty Pacific Bell Wall Mc Cormick & Baroldi Pacific Bell 6534209-5 Page 5 City Council 18 — 1439 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Webb Clifton R Jr rest apprsr Pacific Bell Webb Clint Pacific Bell 1986 BILLIN GS RICHARD H atty Pacific Bell Calif Counties Title Cc Pacific Bell COAS T BUS IN E S S FUN D Pacific Bell Davis N C Associates Pacific Bell Grocery Sales Pacific Bell H & W Insurance Services Pacific Bell Henderson Bryn JD Pacific Bell LAN DAUE R AS S OCIATE S IN C Pacific Bell Medical Diagnostics Inc Pacific Bell Rodwil Corp Pacific Bell 1980 asner Helen W Pacific Telephone Bair & Webh apprsrs Pacific Telephone Barnett George R Pacific Telephone Barnett George rl est apprsr Pacific Telephone Caldwell Harold J atty Pacific Telephone Coastline Financial Services Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone From San Clemente Telephones Call Pacific Telephone From Santa Ana Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Grocery Sales Pacific Telephone Home Office Pacific Telephone I Lincoln National Life Insurance Cc Pacific Telephone L Pacific Telephone Mc Holland Robert E rl est apprsr Pacific Telephone Mc Holm Steven Pacific Telephone Members Mortgage Inc Pacific Telephone Norsell Paul &Asmsocaes tnc Pacific Telephone Padilla Rudolph ins agt Pacific Telephone Rasner Bruce E Pacific Telephone Rodw II Corp Pacific Telephone S OUT@Huntington Beach@ RN PACIFIC Pacific Telephone TITLE COMPANZ S W ATE Z HAROLD LAW OFFICE S OF Pacific Telephone Swatez Harold atty Pacific Telephone T B Pacific Telephone 6534209- 5 Page 6 City Council 18 — 1440 10/3/2023 FINDINGS 525 CABRILLO PARK DR Year Uses Source 2014 APARTMENT ASSN OF ORANGE COUNTY Cole Information Services CDT SOLUTIONS Cole Information Services COLTON COMPANY THE Cole Information Services GEOPENTECH INC Cole Information Services MILLER HARLENE ATTY Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY APARTMENT Cole Information Services ASSOCIATION ORANGE COUNTY MULTI HOUSING Cole Information Services SERVICE PAGTER & MILLER Cole Information Services PAGTER R GIBSON JR ATTY Cole Information Services PRIMERICA Cole Information Services PRIOR RALPH C CPA Cole Information Services SALVATORE & NOKES Cole Information Services SUPERIOR HOMES Cole Information Services THE MORTGAGE MAXIMIZER Cole Information Services UTILITY WORKERS UNION LOCAL 132 Cole Information Services VISTACARE HOSPICE Cole Information Services 2009 BANKERS AFFILIATED MORTGAGE Cole Information Services FINANCIAL LINK INC Cole Information Services GEOPENTECH INC Cole Information Services NETSYSTEMS SOFTWARE TRANNG Cole Information Services PACIFIC COAST HOSPICE Cole Information Services PAGTER & MILLER Cole Information Services PRIOR RALPH C CPA Cole Information Services SUPERIOR HOMES Cole Information Services THE COLTON CO Cole Information Services THE MORTGAGE MAXIMIZER Cole Information Services TRISTAR CAPITAL LLC Cole Information Services 2004 AMERICAN BHVRL STDY INSTDT Cole Information Services FINANCIAL CTR WEST INC Cole Information Services NETSYSTEM SFTWR TRNNG CNSLTNG Cole Information Services RALPH C PRIOR CPA Cole Information Services RALPH PRIOR Cole Information Services RYDER WEST REGION ADMN Cole Information Services THE MORTGAGE MAXIMIZER Cole Information Services TRISTAR CAPITAL LLC Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 Page 7 City Council 18 — 1441 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL STUDIES Cole Information Services INSTITUTE COUNSELING CENTER BARNES & SALAS INCORPORATED CPA Cole Information Services CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF CALIF Cole Information Services DYNAMIC HEALTH CONNECTIONS Cole Information Services INCORPORATED FINANCIAL CENTER WEST Cole Information Services MILLER BRAD REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL Cole Information Services NETSYSTEMS Cole Information Services RYDER WEST REGION ADMIN Cole Information Services RYDER WEST REGION ADMINISTRATION Cole Information Services SALAS GILBERT H JR CPA Cole Information Services SMITH ALLEN R CPA Cole Information Services 1994 BOS, PAUL D Cole Information Services L I A LEASING Cole Information Services Cabrillo Park Drive 515 Cabrillo Park Drive Year Uses Source 1995 Advanced Financal Concepts Pacific Bell Advanced Infusion Therapy Pacific Bell Baroldi Anthony C atty Pacific Bell Beyer Kimberly L atty Pacific Bell C P A Forum Pacific Bell Construction Industry Technology Pacific Bell Green Catherine C atty Pacific Bell Hollobaugh Ellen T atty Pacific Bell Hotel Employees Restaurant Employees Pacific Bell HERE Local 681 JGF Insurance Services Pacific Bell Lakeway Health Center Pacific Bell Mc Cormick William A atty Pacific Bell Midas International Corp Pacific Bell Regain Pacific Bell Royal Alliance Associates Pacific Bell Underwood Chas CPA Pacific Bell United Service Network Pacific Bell Wall Martin J atty Pacific Bell Wall Mc Cormick & Baroldi Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 Page 8 City Council 18 — 1442 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 Woodward Alpert & Associates Pacific Bell 1991 Baroldi Anthony C atty Pacific Bell Billings Eric K Pacific Bell BILLINGS RICHARD Hatty Pacific Bell Davis N C Associates Pacific Bell Foremark Technologies Inc Pacific Bell Foremaster Errol M Pacific Bell Hollobaugh Ellen T Pacific Bell Irvine Therapy Management Associates Inc Pacific Bell J Michael & Associates Pacific Bell J Mitchell Steamers Cleaners Pacific Bell LANDAUER ASSOCIATES INC Pacific Bell Lmeberger Jeannie E Pacific Bell Martin & Robinson CPA Pacific Bell Medical Diagnostics Inc Pacific Bell Medical Dictation Service Pacific Bell Medicus Medical Group Pacific Bell Mona Robinson Contadora Publica Pacific Bell Certificada Monacell Mark Pacific Bell NSI Suite Specialists Pacific Bell NSISERVICESINC Pacific Bell Nursing Services Internatl Pacific Bell Santa Ana Tustin Rehabilitation Center Pacific Bell Shaw Patricia Pacific Bell Thies Helen S Pacific Bell Tinlin Catherine C atty Pacific Bell Wall Martin J atty Pacific Bell Wall Mc Cormick & Baroldi Pacific Bell Webb Clifton R Jr rest apprsr Pacific Bell Webb Clint Pacific Bell 1986 BILLIN GS RICHARD H atty Pacific Bell Calif Counties Title Co Pacific Bell COAS T BUS IN E S S FUN D Pacific Bell Davis N C Associates Pacific Bell Grocery Sales Pacific Bell H & W Insurance Services Pacific Bell Henderson Bryn JD Pacific Bell LAN DAUE R AS S OCIATE S IN C Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 Page 9 City Council 18 — 1443 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Medical Diagnostics Inc Pacific Bell Rodwil Corp Pacific Bell 1980 asner Helen W Pacific Telephone Bair & Webh apprsrs Pacific Telephone Barnett George R Pacific Telephone Barnett George rl est apprsr Pacific Telephone Caldwell Harold J atty Pacific Telephone Coastline Financial Services Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone From San Clemente Telephones Call Pacific Telephone From Santa Ana Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Grocery Sales Pacific Telephone Home Office Pacific Telephone I Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Pacific Telephone L Pacific Telephone Mc Holland Robert E rl est apprsr Pacific Telephone Mc Holm Steven Pacific Telephone Members Mortgage Inc Pacific Telephone Norsell Paul &Asmsocaes tnc Pacific Telephone Padilla Rudolph ins agt Pacific Telephone Rasner Bruce E Pacific Telephone Rodw II Corp Pacific Telephone S OUT@Huntington Beach@ RN PACIFIC Pacific Telephone TITLE COMPANZ S W ATE Z HAROLD LAW OFFICE S OF Pacific Telephone Swatez Harold atty Pacific Telephone T B Pacific Telephone 525 Cabrillo Park Drive Year Uses Source 1995 California Software Products Inc Pacific Bell Financial Center West Pacific Bell LEISURECRAFT INSURANCE AGENCY INC Pacific Bell TRANS PAK INSURANCE AGENCY LIA Leasing Pacific Bell 1991 Barreras Joseph A ns Pacific Bell Barrero Alfonso @Westminster@ Pacific Bell Benefit Plan Services Pacific Bell Bos Paul D CLU ins Pacific Bell California Software Products Inc Pacific Bell 6534209-5 Page10 City Council 18 — 1444 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Cessna Van L D clu ins Pacific Bell FINANCIAL CENTER WEST Pacific Bell LEISURECRAFT INSURANCE AGENCY Pacific Bell LIA Leasing Pacific Bell MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE Pacific Bell INSURANCE CO Orange County Agency J Victor Nally C L U General Agent Missildine J R clu ins Pacific Bell Nalley J V Pacific Bell Nalley J Victor CLU Pacific Bell Roberts Peter F ins Pacific Bell Rushfeldt Collin CLU ins Pacific Bell Thibault Jean Rene ins Pacific Bell 1986 Barreras Joseph A ins Pacific Bell Bos Paul D clu ins Pacific Bell Californmi Software Products Inc Pacific Bell Cessna Van LID cluins Pacific Bell De Bruyn Jack R cluins Pacific Bell J Victor Nalley C L U General Agent Pacific Bell Missildune JR clutns Pacific Bell Nalley J Victor CLU Pacific Bell Roberts Peter F ins Pacific Bell Rushieldt Collin CLU ins Pacific Bell Sornstein Bill ins Pacific Bell 1980 Allstate Enterprises Mortgage Corp Pacific Telephone Armstrong John Realty Pacific Telephone Bos Paul D CLU ins Pacific Telephone Breckenridge Geo A CLU ins Pacific Telephone CALIFORN IA S OLAR POOL BLANKE TS Pacific Telephone California Software Products Inc Pacific Telephone Cessna Van L D CLU ins Pacific Telephone MUN ICIPAL W ATE R DIS TRICT OF ORAN Pacific Telephone GE COUN TYf N wpor Beacl Agency Pacific Telephone Nalley J Victor C Lu Pacific Telephone ORAN GE COUN TY MUN ICIPAL W ATE R Pacific Telephone DIS TRICT Orange County Pacific Telephone Van Brunt H R Bud ins Pacific Telephone Van Brunt John L Pacific Telephone 6534209- 5 Page 11 City Council 18 — 1445 10/3/2023 FINDINGS E 4TH 1971 E 4TH Year Uses Source 1991 Construction Industry Technology Pacific Bell 1986 Chilton Accounts Receivable Management Pacific Bell E 4TH ST 1901 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 ALAR STAFFING Cole Information Services BETTE WEINBERG Cole Information Services CHILDRENS BUREAU SANTA ANA Cole Information Services DISCOUNT FUNDING Cole Information Services DOCTOR IMRAN SHARIEF DIPLOMATE OF Cole Information Services AM ONEOC Cole Information Services 2009 ALA STAFFING & RISK MANAGEMENT INC Cole Information Services ALAR STAFFING CORP Cole Information Services AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES Cole Information Services BENDER & BENDER Cole Information Services CRAWFORD & CO Cole Information Services GILBERT & MARLOWE Cole Information Services ONSITE Cole Information Services VOL CENTER Cole Information Services VOLUNTEER CENTER GRTER ORNGE Cole Information Services CNTY 2004 BINDER & BINDER Cole Information Services CRAWFORD CO Cole Information Services HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES UNION Cole Information Services JANE LIETZ Cole Information Services PROFESSIONAL CAREER INSTITUTE Cole Information Services SKY VALLEY FINANCIAL INC Cole Information Services VOLUNTEER CTR Cole Information Services 1999 AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES Cole Information Services GILBERT & MARLOWE ATTORNEY Cole Information Services NATIONAL TRAFFIC SAFETY INSTITUTE Cole Information Services ONSITE COMMERCIAL & Cole Information Services ENVIRONMENTAL STAFFING 6534209- 5 Page 12 City Council 18 — 1446 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 VOLUNTEER CENTER GREATER ORANGE Cole Information Services COUNTY VOLUNTEER CENTER GREATER ORNG Cole Information Services CNTY COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT FO VOLUNTEER CENTER GREATER ORNG Cole Information Services CNTY CT REFERRAL PROGRAM VOLUNTEER CENTER GREATER ORNG Cole Information Services CNTY NONPROFIT RESRC CENTER VOLUNTEER CENTER GREATER ORNG Cole Information Services CNTY STEP SENIORS TRAIN & VOLUNTEER CENTER GREATER ORNG Cole Information Services CNTY YTH VOLUNTEERING VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITY HOTLINE Cole Information Services WOMENS LAW CENTER Cole Information Services 1995 Coventry Properties Pacific Bell Crawford & Cc Regional Ofc Pacific Bell Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters Pacific Bell Ferency Elizabeth M Attorney At Law Pacific Bell Linkon Steve atty Pacific Bell Pothier & Associates Pacific Bell Pothier Rose Pothier & Associates Pacific Bell Romola Lenders Services Inc Pacific Bell Town Center Plaza Pacific Bell WINTERBOTHAM ROBERT G LAW Pacific Bell OFFICES OF 1994 ALTUS MARKETING INC Cole Information Services ASSOCTN MDCL GROUP Cole Information Services NATIONAL TRAFFIC SAFETY INST Cole Information Services RISK SCIENCES GROUP Cole Information Services SUMMIT ESCROW Cole Information Services 1991 Aleta Frederick Enterprises Inc Pacific Bell Appraisals Unlimited Pacific Bell Chidester Margaret A Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Christofferson Greg P Pacific Bell Covert Spencer E & Joyce Pacific Bell Covert Spencer E Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Cranbrook Claims Management Co The Pacific Bell Engineering Agency Inc Pacific Bell Extended Care Enterprises Pacific Bell Fadely Val R Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Fieldbrook Companies Pacific Bell 6534209-5 Page13 City Council 18 — 1447 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Fieldbrook Properties Inc Pacific Bell Fieldbrook Securities Pacific Bell King Darlene L Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Mott Jonathan J Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Owens Michael L Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell PACIFIC HILLS MORTGAGE COMPANY Pacific Bell PARKER & COVERTS attys Pacific Bell Parker Clayton HParter&Covert attys Pacific Bell R & B Commercial Management Pacific Bell Summit Escrow Administration Office Pacific Bell Toy Michael Y Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Yeoman Douglas N Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Yount Cynthia A Parker& Covert attys Pacific Bell Yount D Pacific Bell Yount Doug E Pacific Bell 1986 A F Personnel Service Pacific Bell Administration Office Pacific Bell Aleta Frederick Enterprises Inc Pacific Bell Aleta Frederick Personnel Service Pacific Bell Aleta Frederick Temporaries Pacific Bell Chidester Margaret A Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Community Title Company Pacific Bell Corporate Offices Pacific Bell Covert P Addison atty Pacific Bell Covert Spencer E Jr atty Pacific Bell Dingman E Wallace Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Engineering Agency Inc Pacific Bell General Employment Enterprises Inc Pacific Bell Great Western Real EstateCommercial Pacific Bell Brokerage Homecrest Insurance Agency Pacific Bell N ATION AL ACCE PTAN CE COMPANZ OF Pacific Bell CALIFORN IA Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Parker Clayton H Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Scholastico Charles S Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell Sierra West Mortgage Pacific Bell Straight Susan L Parker & Covert attys Pacific Bell 1980 Administration Office Pacific Telephone 6534209-5 Page14 City Council 18 — 1448 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Community Title Company Pacific Telephone DAVIS DUN N ION & GARTLAN Pacific Telephone DUN N ION JOHN CPA Pacific Telephone FORD W HOLE S ALE CO i N C whsle roofng Pacific Telephone 3302 Katells Av @Taft@ Ford Wholesale Co Pacific Telephone From @Long Beach@ Telephones Cal Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Cal Pacific Telephone 1975 Brice Nina Rose atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Conway Noel G Corp attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Davis Ken Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dunnion John CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Fluor Drilling Services Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kampa Al G CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rosen Stanley L Inc atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Skane Thos J Jr atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Western Offshore Drilling And Exploratory Cc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1971 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 BENEFIT EQUITY INC Cole Information Services CALIFORNIA DENTAL NETWORK Cole Information Services COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS INSTITUTE Cole Information Services ORA COUNCIL ON AGING Cole Information Services MORTGAGE 2000 Cole Information Services NORTH MURRAY & ASSOCIATES INC Cole Information Services SECURITY PACIFIC MORTGAGE Cole Information Services THINK TOGETHER Cole Information Services WENCES DENTAL LABORATORY Cole Information Services WILCOX DEAN Cole Information Services 2009 AEROTEK Cole Information Services AHMAD KARMOUTA Cole Information Services AMZ INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services BENEFIT EQUITY INC Cole Information Services CALIFORNIA DENTAL NETWORK Cole Information Services CALIFORNIA HEALTH ADVOCATES Cole Information Services COMMUNITY ASSOCS INSTITUTE Cole Information Services ORANGE CO COUNCIL ON AGING ORANGE COUNTY Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 Page 15 City Council 18 — 1449 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 FIDELITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE CORP Cole Information Services FINANCIAL FREEDOM OF ORANGE Cole Information Services GOOD NEIGHBOR MORTGAGE Cole Information Services HICAP Cole Information Services HOPSON PENSION SERVICES INC Cole Information Services KEITH WILKINSON & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services M DEAN WILCOX INSURANCE AGENCY Cole Information Services MORTGAGE 2000 Cole Information Services MT INVESTMENTS Cole Information Services ONSITE CO Cole Information Services PHYSICAL THERAPY CENTER TUSTIN Cole Information Services SECURITY MORTGAGE LENDERS INC Cole Information Services SIDLES NORTH & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services INSURANCE 2004 AMZ INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services BENEFIT EQUITY PLANS INC Cole Information Services CARE Cole Information Services COUNCIL ON AGING ORANGE CITY Cole Information Services DEAN WILCOX INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services EMPLOYERS INSUR WAUSAU A MUTL Cole Information Services GOOD NEIGHBOR MORTGAGE Cole Information Services KEITH WILKINSON ASSOC INC Cole Information Services MT CONSULTING Cole Information Services MT INVESTMENTS Cole Information Services ONSITE CO Cole Information Services SAPHIA PHOTOGRAPHY & ART GILL Cole Information Services SAPHIA PHOTOGRAPHY & ART GLRY Cole Information Services SECURITY MORTGAGE LENDERS INC Cole Information Services SPORT & SPINE PHYSICAL THERAPY Cole Information Services 2002 BUILDING AMZINSURANCE Haines Company CADENTALNETWORK Haines Company COUNCIL ON AGING Haines Company ORANGE COUNTY Haines Company PLANS INC C ARE COUNSELING Haines Company SERVICES BENEFITEQUITY Haines Company 1999 AHMAD KARMOUTA Cole Information Services ARMOUR DORIS C ATTORNEY AT LAW Cole Information Services BENEFIT EQUITY PLANS INCORPORATED Cole Information Services CALCO FINANCIAL Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 Page 16 City Council 18 — 1450 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 CALIFORNIA COUNTIES TITLE COMPANY Cole Information Services CARE CHILD ABUSE RECOVERY ETC Cole Information Services D O T DELIVERY SERVICE Cole Information Services FELDER PHYSICAL THERAPY Cole Information Services INCORPORATED FIDELITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE Cole Information Services CORPORATION GORELICK & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services HICAP Cole Information Services IRIS PROGRAMMING GROUP Cole Information Services KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE Cole Information Services KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICES Cole Information Services MODERN WOODMEN INSURANCE Cole Information Services MORTGAGE 2000 Cole Information Services NATIONAL CREDITORS CONNECTION Cole Information Services OMBUDSMAN -LONG TERM CARE Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING Cole Information Services PHYSICAL THERAPY CENTER OF TUSTIN Cole Information Services UNITED BONDING SERVICES CALIFORNIA Cole Information Services WILKINSON KEITH & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services 1995 Asher Elalne Pacific Bell Avon Products Pacific Bell Calco Financial Pacific Bell California Counties Title Cc Pacific Bell DOT Delivery Service Pacific Bell Hansen James ECFP Pacific Bell Logistic Modeling Center Pacific Bell Lowell Smith & Evers Inc Pacific Bell Modern Woodmen Insurance Pacific Bell Profed Mortgage Corp Pacific Bell Tab Oil Corp Pacific Bell 1994 ASHER, ELAINE Cole Information Services AVON PRODUCTS INC Cole Information Services CONSTRN INDS TECH Cole Information Services LEVIN, JEROME A Cole Information Services MCKIBBIN, MICHAEL K Cole Information Services PACIFIC HILLS MORTGAGE CO Cole Information Services WILLIAM A HOGIE Cole Information Services 1991 Bic, Rad Labs Co Inc Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 Page 17 City Council 18 — 1451 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 California Counties Title Cc Pacific Bell Cohen Martin M Law Offices Of Pacific Bell Downer John M atty Pacific Bell Hogie Wm Aatty Pacific Bell Knudson James A atty Pacific Bell Levin Jerome A Pacific Bell Mc Kibbin Michael K Solomon & Levin Pacific Bell Solomon & Mc Kibbm attys Pacific Bell Solomon Richard A Solomon & Levin Pacific Bell Solomon& Levin Pacific Bell South Coast Orthopedic Health Care Center Pacific Bell Wausau Insurance Companies Pacific Bell 1986 California Counties Title Cc Pacific Bell Century Financial Pacific Bell Crenshaw Roger T MD Pacific Bell Dairyland Insurance Cc Pacific Bell Doctors Business Bureau Of So Calif The Pacific Bell Donnelly Information Publishing Pacific Bell Food Service Division Pacific Bell Galassi Michael atty Pacific Bell H & W Insurance Services Pacific Bell Los Angeles Zone Sales Office Pacific Bell National Directory Co Pacific Bell Orange County Psychological Services Pacific Bell Centers Psychological Services Centers Pacific Bell Roberts Warren D Ph D Pacific Bell Scientific Business Consultants Pacific Bell Sentry Claims Service Pacific Bell Sentry Insuraisce Pacific Bell Sentry Life Ins Brokerage Pacific Bell St Paul Title Co Pacific Bell Sturgeon & Galassi Attorneys At Law Pacific Bell Sturgeon Allen E atty Pacific Bell 1980 Ansul Company ibe Pacific Telephone Answer Network Pacific Telephone Burdg & Accetla CPA Pacific Telephone CDat Cor Pacific Telephone Chomeriecs Inc Pacific Telephone 6534209-5 Page18 City Council 18 — 1452 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Club Products Co Pacific Telephone CON TACTS IN FLUE N TIAL Pacific Telephone Convertors Pacific Telephone Cox Danny Seminars Pacific Telephone Crenshaw Roger T MD Pacific Telephone Dairyland Insurance Co Pacific Telephone Daisey Robt E Jr Pacific Telephone Ecos Associates Pacific Telephone Employee Support Systems Pacific Telephone Employee Transfer Consultants Co Pacific Telephone Extend A Call Pacific Telephone Extenda Communications Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone From Cap istrano Valley Teleptones Cell Pacific Telephone From Fullerton Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Hillcrgst Psychological Center Pacific Telephone Matrix Leasing Pacific Telephone Mc Gee Industries Pacific Telephone Mercury Financial Services Inc Pacific Telephone Occupational Rehabilitation Pacific Telephone Psychologlca IServices Centers Pacific Telephone Punkys Great American Meat Pie Shoppes Pacific Telephone Republic Title Co See St Paul Title Cc Pacific Telephone Roberts Warren D Dr Hillcrest Psychological Pacific Telephone Center San Clemente No Charge Ask Opr For Pacific Telephone Scientific Business Consultants Pacific Telephone Sentry Claims Service Pacific Telephone Sentry Insurance Pacific Telephone Sentry Insurance bnd dept Pacific Telephone Sentry Life Ins Brokerage Pacific Telephone Sol S Beach BI @Anaheim@ Pacific Telephone St Paul Title Co Pacific Telephone The Homn to ice Pacific Telephone The Horne ffice Pacific Telephone The Hotel Pacific Telephone Turbo Carpet Cleaning Pacific Telephone Wespac Tax Services Pacific Telephone Wesper Wm Pacific Telephone 6534209-5 Page19 City Council 18 — 1453 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Western Health Corp Pacific Telephone Wiesner Mark G Ph D Pacific Telephone 1975 Bender E C Poole Rasmussen Accountants Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Inc Cardwell Harvey CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Cordless Communications Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dairyland Insurance Cc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dul Wm L Poole Rasmussen Accountants Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Eric Moore & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Financial Industries Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ford Doye Lincoln Natl Life Ins Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Frontier Insurance Agencies Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hillcrest Psychological Center Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Leonard Jim Republic Insurance Brokers Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lincoln Natl Life Ins Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ORANGE COUNTY PSYCHOLOGICAL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. SERVICES CENTERS Poole David A Poole Rasmussen Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Accountants Inc Poole Rasmussen Accountants Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Professional Seminars Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES CENTERS Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rasmussen Jos Poole Rasmussen Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Accountants Inc REPUBLIC INSURANCE BROKERS INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. REPUBLIC TITLE CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Roberts Warren D Dr Hillcrest Psychological Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Center Western Health Enterprises Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Western High School Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. WESTERN MORTGAGE CORP ORANGE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. COUNTY BR Wiand Charles Dr Hillcrest Psychological Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Center Wiand Charles O PhD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. East 4th Street 1971 East 4th Street Year Uses Source 2002 BUILDING AMZINSURANCE Haines Company CADENTALNETWORK Haines Company 6534209- 5 Page 20 City Council 18 — 1454 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 COUNCIL ON AGING Haines Company ORANGE COUNTY Haines Company PLANS INC C ARE COUNSELING Haines Company SERVICES BENEFITEQUITY Haines Company 1995 Asher Elalne Pacific Bell Avon Products Pacific Bell Calco Financial Pacific Bell California Counties Title Cc Pacific Bell DOT Delivery Service Pacific Bell Hansen James ECFP Pacific Bell Logistic Modeling Center Pacific Bell Lowell Smith & Evers Inc Pacific Bell Modern Woodmen Insurance Pacific Bell Profed Mortgage Corp Pacific Bell Tab Oil Corp Pacific Bell 1991 Bio Rad Labs Co Inc Pacific Bell California Counties Title Cc Pacific Bell Cohen Martin M Law Offices Of Pacific Bell Construction Industry Technology Pacific Bell Downer John M atty Pacific Bell Hogie Wm Aatty Pacific Bell Knudson James A atty Pacific Bell Levin Jerome A Pacific Bell Mc Kibbin Michael K Solomon & Levin Pacific Bell Solomon & Mc Kibbm attys Pacific Bell Solomon Richard A Solomon & Levin Pacific Bell Solomon& Levin Pacific Bell South Coast Orthopedic Health Care Center Pacific Bell Wausau Insurance Companies Pacific Bell 1986 California Counties Title Cc Pacific Bell Century Financial Pacific Bell Chilton Accounts Receivable Management Pacific Bell Crenshaw Roger T MD Pacific Bell Dairyland Insurance Cc Pacific Bell Doctors Business Bureau Of So Calif The Pacific Bell Donnelly Information Publishing Pacific Bell Food Service Division Pacific Bell Galassi Michael atty Pacific Bell 6534209-5 Page 21 City Council 18 — 1455 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 H & W Insurance Services Pacific Bell Los Angeles Zone Sales Office Pacific Bell National Directory Co Pacific Bell Orange County Psychological Services Pacific Bell Centers Psychological Services Centers Pacific Bell Roberts Warren D Ph D Pacific Bell Scientific Business Consultants Pacific Bell Sentry Claims Service Pacific Bell Sentry Insuraisce Pacific Bell Sentry Life Ins Brokerage Pacific Bell St Paul Title Co Pacific Bell Sturgeon & Galassi Attorneys At Law Pacific Bell Sturgeon Allen E atty Pacific Bell 1980 Ansul Company ibe Pacific Telephone Answer Network Pacific Telephone Burdg & Accetla CPA Pacific Telephone CDat Cor Pacific Telephone Chomeriecs Inc Pacific Telephone Club Products Co Pacific Telephone CON TACTS IN FLUE N TIAL Pacific Telephone Convertors Pacific Telephone Cox Danny Seminars Pacific Telephone Crenshaw Roger T MD Pacific Telephone Dairyland Insurance Co Pacific Telephone Daisey Robt E Jr Pacific Telephone Ecos Associates Pacific Telephone Employee Support Systems Pacific Telephone Employee Transfer Consultants Co Pacific Telephone Extend A Call Pacific Telephone Extenda Communications Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone From Cap istrano Valley Teleptones Cell Pacific Telephone From Fullerton Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Hillcrgst Psychological Center Pacific Telephone Matrix Leasing Pacific Telephone Mc Gee Industries Pacific Telephone Mercury Financial Services Inc Pacific Telephone Occupational Rehabilitation Pacific Telephone 6534209- 5 Page 22 City Council 18 — 1456 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Psychologlca IServices Centers Pacific Telephone Punkys Great American Meat Pie Shoppes Pacific Telephone Republic Title Co See St Paul Title Cc Pacific Telephone Roberts Warren D Dr Hillcrest Psychological Pacific Telephone Center San Clemente No Charge Ask Opr For Pacific Telephone Scientific Business Consultants Pacific Telephone Sentry Claims Service Pacific Telephone Sentry Insurance Pacific Telephone Sentry Insurance bnd dept Pacific Telephone Sentry Life Ins Brokerage Pacific Telephone Sol S Beach BI @Anaheim@ Pacific Telephone St Paul Title Co Pacific Telephone The Homn to ice Pacific Telephone The Horne ffice Pacific Telephone The Hotel Pacific Telephone Turbo Carpet Cleaning Pacific Telephone Wespac Tax Services Pacific Telephone Wesper Wm Pacific Telephone Western Health Corp Pacific Telephone Wiesner Mark G Ph D Pacific Telephone 1975 Bender E C Poole Rasmussen Accountants Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Inc Cardwell Harvey CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Cordless Communications Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dairyland Insurance Cc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dul Wm L Poole Rasmussen Accountants Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Eric Moore & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Financial Industries Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ford Doye Lincoln Natl Life Ins Cc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Frontier Insurance Agencies Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hillcrest Psychological Center Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Leonard Jim Republic Insurance Brokers Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lincoln Natl Life Ins Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ORANGE COUNTY PSYCHOLOGICAL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. SERVICES CENTERS Poole David A Poole Rasmussen Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Accountants Inc Poole Rasmussen Accountants Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Professional Seminars Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 6534209- 5 Page 23 City Council 18 — 1457 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses 1975 PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES CENTERS Rasmussen Jos Poole Rasmussen Accountants Inc REPUBLIC INSURANCE BROKERS INC REPUBLIC TITLE CO Roberts Warren D Dr Hillcrest Psychological Center Western Health Enterprises Western High School WESTERN MORTGAGE CORP ORANGE COUNTY BR Wiand Charles Dr Hillcrest Psychological Center Wiand Charles O PhD Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 6534209- 5 Page 24 City Council 18 — 1458 10/3/2023 FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. 4TH 2021 4TH Year Uses Source 1995 Klump Craig W CPA Pacific Bell 1986 Midland Mortgage Co Pacific Bell 1970 CALIFORNIA STATE OF contmd PARKS General Telephone Co., of California & RECREATION DEPT Contd Orange Coast Area Contd 2030 4TH Year Uses Source 1995 America First Residential & Investments Pacific Bell Garman Wm F atty Pacific Bell Garman Wm F atty Pacific Bell Ackerman Arthur F atty Pacific Bell 1991 Midas Systems Corp Pacific Bell 1980 Lindsey Margaret MA Pacific Telephone in sey Mark Pacific Telephone 4TH E 1782 4TH E Year Uses Source 1956 Smith & Snavely Tree Sery Smith H C Luskey Brothers 4TH ST 2000 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1986 GOLDBE RG LA CUE S N IXE N & Pacific Bell GOODMAN A PARTN E IRS HIP OF PROFE S S ION AL CORPS 2001 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1995 De Grange Arthurd J CPA Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 1 Page 25 City Council 18 — 1459 10/3/2023 FINDINGS 2021 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1995 Doherty Martin J Portigal Hemmerton & Pacific Bell Allen 1980 KIR ATRICK CHARLE S MCPAA Pacific Telephone 2030 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1995 First Century Realty Pacific Bell 4TH ST E 1765 4TH ST E Year Uses Source 1936 C H Lake Western Directory Co. 1770 4TH ST E Year Uses Source 1936 H W Lewis Western Directory Co. 1930 H W Lewis Western Directory Co. 1925 H W Lewis Western Directory Co. 2041 4TH ST E Year Uses Source 1936 M W of America Bldg Western Directory Co. 2065 4TH ST E Year Uses Source 1930 / Northwestern Mutual Life Ins Co Western Directory Co. CABRILLO PARK DR 210 CABRILLO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1950 Stavron Pericles P r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 218 CABRILLO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1950 Chesebro Mae Mrs r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 6534209-5 Page 26 City Council 18 — 1460 10/3/2023 FINDINGS 249 CABRILLO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1980 Voget Julius A Pacific Telephone 316 CABRILLO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1950 Webster Anna M Mrs r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 327 CABRILLO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1986 Daggett Sandra Pacific Bell 329 CABRILLO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1941 Johnson Abe W r Southern California Telephone Co. E 41U 2030 E 41U Year Uses Source 1995 Fretwell Olivia MFCC Pacific Bell E 4T 2030 E 4T Year Uses Source 1980 GRE AT W E S T LIE A Pacific Telephone E 4TH 2001 E 4TH Year Uses Source 1995 Monkarsh David Ph D Pacific Bell 2030 E 4TH Year Uses Source 1995 Capaldi Fredrick P & Associates Pacific Bell 1986 Murray David D Attorney At Law Pacific Bell California Jaycee Newspaper Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 1 Page 27 City Council 18 — 1461 10/3/2023 2041 E 4TH Year Uses 1970 The Gemini Club E 4TH AVE 1956 E 4TH AVE Year Uses 1970 AJAX FORGE CO 1966 AJAX FORGE CO 2021 E 4TH AVE Year Uses 1980 urchett Dean E RIC Equities Inc 2030 E 4TH AVE Year Uses 1980 Pugh Jas Marshall Ph D E 4TH CUSTOMER SERVICE FINDINGS Source General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Telephone 1750 E 4TH CUSTOMER SERVICE Year Uses Source 1966 Santa Ana Pacific Telephone ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES Pacific Telephone E 4TH LONG BEACH 1909 E 4TH LONG BEACH Year Uses 1970 Francois Manhattan 1934 E 4TH LONG BEACH Year Uses 1970 AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP E 4TH LONG DEACH 21343A 1909 E 4TH LONG DEACH 21343A Year Uses 1980 Francois Manhattan Source General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California Source Pacific Telephone 6534209- 5 1 Page 28 City Council 18 — 1462 10/3/2023 FINDINGS E 4TH LONG LEACH 1909 E 4TH LONG LEACH Year Uses Source 1991 Francois Manhattan Pacific Bell E 4TH ST 1710 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1980 Allstate Finances Pacific Telephone 1724 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1750 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cole Information Services STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE Cole Information Services FUND WORKERS COMPENSATION Cole Information Services INSURANCE FUND BONNE BRIDGES MUELLER OKEEFE Cole Information Services &N 2009 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE Cole Information Services FUND 2004 DREYFUSS RYAN & WEIFENBACH Cole Information Services BONNE BRIDGES MLR OKEEFE Cole Information Services OKEEFE HOLM Cole Information Services STATE COMPENSATION INSRNC FUND Cole Information Services 2002 ALLSTATE INSCLAIM 714 4 S Haines Company OFC BONNEJONES Haines Company B 81 DGES MUELLER CAST Haines Company COMPENSATION INS FUND CAMERON 8 DREYFUSS Haines Company COMPENSATIONINS Haines Company HOLMMARGARET Haines Company ATTY ROSS BARRYA ATTY Haines Company STATECMPNSTNWS Haines Company FND CERTFCTS STATECMPNSTN INS Haines Company FND CLAIMS STATECMPNSTN INS Haines Company 6534209-5 1 Page 29 City Council 18 — 1463 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 FND LEGAL STATECMPNSTN INS Haines Company FNDSLSSV STATE COMPENSATION Haines Company INS FUND WORKERS Haines Company COMPENSATN Haines Company 1999 T D INVESTMENT PROPERTIES Cole Information Services ROSS BARRY A ATTORNEY AT LA Cole Information Services CYBERLINK Cole Information Services CALIFORNIA STATE OF Cole Information Services COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND WORKERS COMPENSATION Cole Information Services INSURANCE FUND COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS Cole Information Services T D SERVICE COMPANY Cole Information Services COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Cole Information Services ALLCARE WHITTIER MEDICAL SUPPLY Cole Information Services 14108 E WHITTIER BL STUART WRIGHT MORTGAGE Cole Information Services INCORPORATED BONNE JONES BRIDGES MUELLER & Cole Information Services OKEEFE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIO STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE Cole Information Services FUND CAMERON & DREYFUSS Cole Information Services HOLM MARGARET BONNE JONES Cole Information Services BRIDGES MUELLER & OKEEFE PROFESS 1986 Santa Ana Pacific Bell Interstate United Management Services Pacific Bell Corp Allstate Finances Pacific Bell Casualty & Property Pacific Bell Santa Ana Pacific Bell 1980 Casualty & Property Pacific Telephone Santa Amta Pacific Telephone Kloster Paul G ofc Pacific Telephone 1975 Allstate Credit Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Regional Office Anaheim Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Santa Ana Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Commercial Insurance Dept Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Santa Ana Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 6534209-5 Page 30 City Council 18 — 1464 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 ALLSTATE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kloster Paul G ofc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES General Telephone Co., of California Regional Ofc Santa ANAHEIM General Telephone Co., of California Santa ANAHEIM General Telephone Co., of California ALLSTATE General Telephone Co., of California Allstate Credit Corp General Telephone Co., of California Allstate Credit Corp General Telephone Co., of California ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES General Telephone Co., of California Regional Ofc 1966 Allstate Credit Corp Pacific Telephone Regional Ofc Pacific Telephone ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES Pacific Telephone Santa Ana Pacific Telephone ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES Pacific Telephone 1960 Allstate Ins K 1 2 a 6211 22 A Luskey Brothers & Co., Continuation of E 4th SA Luskey Brothers & Co., 1770 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1950 Lewis Harry W r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Lewis Harry W r Southern California Telephone Co. 1941 Lewis Harry W r Southern California Telephone Co. 1782 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1955 Smith & Snavely The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Smith & Snavely The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1788 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1960 Lagal Remy KI 3 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 1794 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1960 ripton Dorothy L KI 3 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 1955 Tipton Bertha H r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Tipton Bertha H r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Tipton Private School Southern California Telephone Co. 1941 Tipton School Southern California Telephone Co. 6534209- 5 Page 31 City Council 18 — 1465 10/3/2023 FINDINGS 1796 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1946 Carswell R E r Southern California Telephone Co. 1941 Carswell R E r Southern California Telephone Co. 1798 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1950 Jones Jimmy r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Jones Jimmy Franklin Life Ins Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Franklin Life Ins Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Walker Herbert C r Southern California Telephone Co. Harris Otis r Southern California Telephone Co. 1941 Erwin S A r Southern California Telephone Co. 1828 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1837 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1946 Robinson A M Mrs r Southern California Telephone Co. 1839 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1864 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX CO Haines Company 1871 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1900 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 KAISER PERMANENTE Cole Information Services 2009 KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS Cole Information Services THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP Cole Information Services INC OCCUPATION HEALTH DEPARTMENT Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 32 City Council 18 — 1466 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Cole Information Services PERMANENTE KAISER PERMANENTE PHARMACY Cole Information Services 2004 TUSTIN SANTA ANA MEDICAL Cole Information Services KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CLNC Cole Information Services KAISER PERMANENTE PHARMACY Cole Information Services 1999 KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CARE Cole Information Services PROGRAM TUSTIN SANTA AN KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CARE Cole Information Services PROGRAM TUSTI KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CARE Cole Information Services PROGRAM TUSTINSANTA ANA 1995 TUSTIN SANTA ANA MEDICAL OFFICES Pacific Bell KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CARE Pacific Bell PROGRAM Contd 1994 KAISER MED MN NMBR Cole Information Services 1991 Santa Ana Psychiatric Offices Pacific Bell Telephone Pacific Bell Prentice Hall Online Pacific Bell Statewide Information Systems California Pacific Bell FHe Statewide Nursing Program Pacific Bell STATEWUDE RENT A FENCE INC No Pacific Bell Cha To Ca Bieg Pairt 1986 All State Credit Pacific Bell Banyard Robert A Judicial Arbitration Pacific Bell Service Barrett Newell Judicial Arbitration Service Pacific Bell Builder Sales Corp Pacific Bell Decision Making Information Pacific Bell Eliason Max V Judicial Arbitration Service Pacific Bell Investors Mortgage Service Co Pacific Bell JUDICIAL ARBITRATION S E RVICE Pacific Bell Santa Ana Psychiatric Offices Pacific Bell Keyes Fibre Co Pacific Bell Lawrence Gary C Co Pacific Bell Knight Warren Judicial Artiration Service Pacific Bell Kneeland Robert P Judicial Arbitration Pacific Bell Service Lee William S Judicial Arbitration Service Pacific Bell Lincoln Service Corp Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 33 City Council 18 — 1467 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Northwestern National Ins Co See Pacific Pacific Bell National Insurance Company National Insurance Company Pacific Bell Pacific Hills Mortgage Company Pacific Bell Pacific National Insurance Company Pacific Bell Primark Pacific Bell Qualogy Inc Pacific Bell Rutter J E T Judicial Arbitration Service Pacific Bell Statewide Information Systems California Pacific Bell File Sumner Bruce W Judicial Arbitration Pacific Bell Service 1980 ALE XAN DE R & ALE XAN DE R OF Pacific Telephone CALIFORN IA IN C Burnett Ehline Company Pacific Telephone Retirement Funding Company Pacific Telephone Development Co Ordinators Inc Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Hunter Financial Inc Pacific Telephone JUDICIAL ARBITRATION S E RVICE Pacific Telephone eyes Fibre Co Pacific Telephone Knight Warren Judicial Arbitration Service Pacific Telephone Lincoln Service Corp Pacific Telephone Northwestern National Ins Co See Pacific Pacific Telephone National Insurance Company National Insurance Company Pacific Telephone Pacific Hills Mortgage Company Pacific Telephone Pacific Home Loans Pacific Telephone Pacific National Insurance Company Pacific Telephone Claims Pacific Telephone Personal Pacific Telephone Commercial Pacific Telephone Life Pacific Telephone Information Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Sr H LE Eins Pacific Telephone Santa Ana Pacific Telephone 1902 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 OBECERRAMana Haines Company 6534209- 5 1 Page 34 City Council 18 — 1468 10/3/2023 FINDINGS 1906 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 IKAISERMEDMNTL Haines Company HLTU PSYCHY Haines Company 1910 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2009 JOSE MADRIGAL Cole Information Services 2004 JOSE MADRIGAL Cole Information Services 1924 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 PLACINTAPau I Haines Company 1943 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 2000 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 EBERT & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services LUNETTO & HEGEL LAW OFFICES Cole Information Services WESTIN ENGINEERING INC Cole Information Services CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK Cole Information Services NORTONPETERSENFUROMOTO LLP Cole Information Services URBAN HOUSING COMMUNITIES Cole Information Services PLANNED PARENTHOOD Cole Information Services LAW OFFICES OF DEBRA RICE Cole Information Services NUNEZ JOHN P & GARCIA & Cole Information Services ASSOCIATES RGIS Cole Information Services 1ST FUNDING MORTGAGE Cole Information Services LAW OFFICE OF ANGEL CARRAZCO Cole Information Services APC HEGEL EDWARD J JR ATTY Cole Information Services DISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA Cole Information Services NEW DIMENSION REAL ESTATE Cole Information Services STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cole Information Services SHAPIN & BUCHANAN Cole Information Services 2009 URBAN HOUSING COMMUNITIES Cole Information Services JAMES L STAMPS FOUNDATION Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 35 City Council 18 — 1469 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 GLOBAL ESTATE SERVICES INC Cole Information Services UHC 00317 NORTH HILLS L P Cole Information Services STERLING HOME LOANS INC Cole Information Services ACUPUNCTURE MEDICAL PAIN Cole Information Services MANAGEMENT FORMUZIS PICKERSGILL & HUNT INC Cole Information Services RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS Cole Information Services CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK Cole Information Services TWENTY TWO CAFE INC Cole Information Services WESTIN ENGINEERING INC Cole Information Services HERITAGE COMMUNITY HOUSING INC Cole Information Services LUNETTO & HEGEL Cole Information Services JEWISH NATIONAL FUND Cole Information Services FIRST FUNDING MORTGAGE Cole Information Services SHAPIN & BUCHANAN Cole Information Services NEW VILLAGE REALTY GROUP Cole Information Services 2004 STERLING HOME LOANS INC Cole Information Services TRATTORIA BAROLO INC Cole Information Services FIRST FUNDING MORTGAGE INC Cole Information Services JEWISH NATIONAL FUND Cole Information Services FORMUZIS PICKERSGILL & HUNT INC Cole Information Services GENERAL MEDICAL APPLICATIONS Cole Information Services SHAPIN & BUCHANAN Cole Information Services LAW OFFICES OF HWTN & FRZL PLC Cole Information Services STERLING NOTARY SERVICES Cole Information Services TOTAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT Cole Information Services INC LUNETTO & HEGEL Cole Information Services COLLINS PASADENA PROPERTIES Cole Information Services GLOBAL ESTATE SERVICES INC Cole Information Services ALL PRO BROKERS Cole Information Services SB FLAMES INC Cole Information Services UNITED SERVICE NETWORK Cole Information Services HURD THORNTON Cole Information Services H THORNTON Cole Information Services 2002 BUILDING BENEFITLANDTITLE Haines Company CO CTREALTYCORP Haines Company CONTRCTRS NETWORK Haines Company INSURANCE SV COUNTRYWIDE Haines Company 6534209-5 1 Page 36 City Council 18 — 1470 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 FUNDING CORP Haines Company 1999 CONTRACTORS NETWORK Cole Information Services INSURANCE SERVICE LANDSAFE TITLE CUSTOMER SERVICE Cole Information Services BRIAN POWELL INSURANCE Cole Information Services SERVICES AIM INCORPORATED Cole Information Services JEWISH NATIONAL FUND Cole Information Services RESOURCES INCORPORATED Cole Information Services BENEFIT LAND TITLE COMPANY Cole Information Services COUNTRYWIDE FUNDING Cole Information Services CORPORATION BTP INSURANCE MARKETING Cole Information Services INCORPORATED ITT LIFE INSURANCE Cole Information Services OPTIMA MORTGAGE CORPORATION Cole Information Services GATEWAY FUNDING Cole Information Services PICKERSGILL & FORMUZIS Cole Information Services FORMUZIS PICKERSGILL & HUNT Cole Information Services SANTA ANA ECONOMIC Cole Information Services DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TRICORE INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services INTERSTATE RESOURCE Cole Information Services CORPORATION GENERAL MEDICAL APPLICATIONS Cole Information Services HUNT TAMORAH Cole Information Services 1995 AIM Inc Pacific Bell BTP Insurance Marketing Inc Pacific Bell Formuzis & Pickersgill Inc Pacific Bell Jewish Nati Fund Pacific Bell Pickersgill & Formuzis Pacific Bell 1994 CARMELS CORP HDQS Cole Information Services RAGSDALE R W ATTY Cole Information Services FORMUZIS & PICKERSGILL INC Cole Information Services MASON GARY T ATTY Cole Information Services GRAYWOOD FNCL CORP Cole Information Services WESTMARK BUILDING Cole Information Services CALIFORNIA BONDING & BUSINESS Cole Information Services GRAYWOOD FINANCIAL CORP Cole Information Services 1991 AIM Inc Pacific Bell BTP Insurance Marketing Inc Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 1 Page 37 City Council 18 — 1471 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Hospital Council Of Southern California Pacific Bell Mason Gary T atty Pacific Bell From Newport Beach Telephones Call Pacific Bell Mc Cain E Richard Law Of ice Of Pacific Bell Minnesota Mutual Life Ins Co Pacific Bell Old Stone Credit Corporation Of Ca Pacific Bell Ragsdale & Mason attys Pacific Bell Ragsdale Robert W atty Pacific Bell Waters Wm Patrick atty Pacific Bell Western Insurance Mangement Corp Pacific Bell Westmark Insurance Services Inc Pacific Bell Westmark Mortgage Corp Pacific Bell 1986 AMBAC Pacific Bell American Appraisal Associates Inc Pacific Bell American Appraisal Co Inc See American Pacific Bell Appraisal Associates American Appraisal Co The Pacific Bell American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp Pacific Bell BTP insurance Marketing Inc Pacific Bell Di Francesco Hay & Co Pacific Bell General Appraisal Co See American Pacific Bell Appraisal Company The Goldberg Mitchel R atty Pacific Bell Goodman Sheldon S atty Pacific Bell Group Pacific Bell In Life Insurance Pacific Bell IN TE L CORP Pacific Bell Lacues Jerry A atty Pacific Bell Lake Jeffrey L Pacific Bell MGIC Pacific Bell Mortgage Guaranty Ins Corp Pacific Bell Nash Paul S Attorney At Law Pacific Bell Nixen Michael G atty Pacific Bell Old Stone Credit Corp Pacific Bell 1980 American Appraisal Company Pacific Telephone Vllak Micieal Great West Life Assurance Pacific Telephone Co 1970 Hood & Schmidt Inc engnrng geolgsts General Telephone Co., of California 6534209-5 Page 38 City Council 18 — 1472 10/3/2023 FINDINGS 2001 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 MEDNET Cole Information Services SNS PARK ENTERPRISE Cole Information Services ABSOLUTE SIGNS Cole Information Services GGC CARE Cole Information Services NUEVOS ENCUENTROS INC Cole Information Services S PARK DENTAL Cole Information Services MI CASITA MORTGAGE Cole Information Services TEAM ALVAREZ INSURANCE Cole Information Services SERVICES NBD MARKETING Cole Information Services 2009 FIRST CHOICE REAL ESTATE Cole Information Services NBD MARKETING Cole Information Services YOUNGS TAX & FINANCIAL SERVICES Cole Information Services FIRST CHOICE LENDING Cole Information Services ABSOLUTE SIGNS Cole Information Services EZ MORTGAGE FUNDING INC Cole Information Services TICON GENERAL CONTRACTORS Cole Information Services CALIFORNIA SOLAR SYSTEMS INC Cole Information Services GEORGE W SERBIA ATTORNEY Cole Information Services EBERT ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services HERITAGE SECURITY SERVICES Cole Information Services DAS INC Cole Information Services ROMELL FOSTER OWENS INC Cole Information Services 2004 GEORGE SERBIA Cole Information Services LINDA KEYES Cole Information Services JEAN GARDNER ASSOC Cole Information Services MANAGEMENT EBERT ASSOCS Cole Information Services NBD MARKETING Cole Information Services UNITED FRIENDS REALTY Cole Information Services BACK IN HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC Cole Information Services SOUTH COAST HEARING RPRSNTTVS Cole Information Services INC FIRST CHOICE REAL ESTATE Cole Information Services SIERRA APPRAISAL GROUP Cole Information Services LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE W SERBIA Cole Information Services SC PHYSICIAN MANAGEMENT LLC Cole Information Services RAINBOW HOME CARE SERVICES INC Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 39 City Council 18 — 1473 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2004 GEORGE SERBIA ATTY AT LAW Cole Information Services ABSOLUTE SIGNS Cole Information Services SC PHYSICIANS MANAGEMENT Cole Information Services SC PRACTICE MANAGEMENT Cole Information Services 2002 REGISTRY RENUESERVICE Haines Company PRODUCTS SAEVIG ROGER AATTY Haines Company SANTAANA Haines Company EDUCATORS ASSN Haines Company SERBIAGEORGEATTY SOUTH CST HEARING Haines Company REPS TAX CONSULTING Haines Company TIPPING DONALD Haines Company CPA UBIBUSINESS Haines Company BROKERS Haines Company BUILDING BURCAWMARKDC Haines Company BURCAWMARKDC Haines Company BORCAWMARKDC Haines Company CIMLINCINC Haines Company COMNTY FINANCIA Haines Company INC DASINC Haines Company GOKOOROBTJLAW Haines Company OFFICES HUNTS OCLOCK Haines Company JENNINGSMARCJ Haines Company KELLE ROBERT W MD Haines Company KEYES&ASSOCIATES Haines Company MILLEACOURT Haines Company RPRTNG NUTRITIONALTESTING Haines Company RAINBOWHOMECARE Haines Company SERVICES RELIEFSTAFF Haines Company REGISTRY RELIEFSTAFF Haines Company 1999 JENNINGS MARC J ATTORNEY Cole Information Services ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES Cole Information Services SALES OFFICES FIRST REPUBLIC MORTGAGE Cole Information Services KLIGMAN NEIL F ATTORNEY Cole Information Services REITEN TED INS Cole Information Services LOBAUGH HAL INS Cole Information Services NUTRITIONAL TESTING SERVICE Cole Information Services BURCAW MARK DC Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 40 City Council 18 — 1474 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 SOLOMON RICHARD A SOLOMON & Cole Information Services LEVIN RAINBOW HOME CARE SERVICES Cole Information Services LIONEX MORTGAGE Cole Information Services SCARBROUGH DAVID L CPA Cole Information Services DIVINITY PROJECT Cole Information Services MILLEA COURT REPORTING Cole Information Services LEVIN JEROME A Cole Information Services TAX CONSULTING & PREPARATION Cole Information Services SERVICES KELLER ROBERT W MD Cole Information Services COLE HORRIGAN Cole Information Services SERBIA GEORGE ATTORNEY AT LAW Cole Information Services LEVIN JEROME A ATTORNEY Cole Information Services HUNT & OCLOCK Cole Information Services PERIX INDUSTRIES Cole Information Services CIMLINC INCORPORATED Cole Information Services PERSONAL COMPUTER CONCEPTS Cole Information Services SAEVIG ROGER A ATTORNEY AT LAW Cole Information Services SANTA ANA EDUCATORS Cole Information Services ASSOCIATION 1995 Allstate Insurance Companies Contd Pacific Bell Sales Offices Contd Huntington Beach Contd Santa ANAHEIM Pacific Bell Burcaw Mark DC Pacific Bell Burcaw Mark DC Pacific Bell Burr Brown Research Corp Pacific Bell Cimlinc Inc Pacific Bell Horrigan Cole Enterprises Pacific Bell Hunt & OClock Pacific Bell Keller Robert W MD Pacific Bell Kligman Neil F atty Pacific Bell Levin Jerome A Pacific Bell Mc Kibbin Michael K Solomon & Levin Pacific Bell Millea Court Reporting Pacific Bell Nutritional Testing Service Pacific Bell Rosenberg Judith Ph D Pacific Bell Solomon & Levin Pacific Bell Solomon Richard A Solomon & levin Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 1 Page 41 City Council 18 — 1475 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1994 GOLDEN CIRCLE CHIROPRACTIC GRP Cole Information Services JUDITH ROSENBERG PHD Cole Information Services HOME AID Cole Information Services D & T BOOKKEEPING & TAX SVC Cole Information Services DEGRANGE, ARTHUR J Cole Information Services BURR BROWN CORP Cole Information Services BUILDING IND ASSN Cole Information Services DEHERAS, SARAH Cole Information Services ROBERT W KELLER MD Cole Information Services 1991 Abritration Services Unlimited Pacific Bell Abromavich L @Fountain Valley@ Pacific Bell Abrose MJ @Huntington Beach@ O Pacific Bell Abruntilla T Pacific Bell Santa Ana Pacific Bell Building Industry Assn Of So Calif Inc Pacific Bell Orange County Region Building Industry Outreach Program Pacific Bell Burr Brown Research Corp Pacific Bell De Grange Arthur J CPA Pacific Bell De Grasse Ed & Dianne Pacific Bell de Heras Sarah counslr Pacific Bell Hamburger Charles D Ph D Pacific Bell Home Aid Pacific Bell Keller Robert W MD Pacific Bell Leathers Barbara MA Pacific Bell Masonry Unlimited Pacific Bell Monkarsh David Ph D Pacific Bell WOLF GERALD A atty Pacific Bell 1986 Collender Richard A Wolf & Collender Pacific Bell Associates attys Commercial Industrial Council Pacific Bell Empire General Life Ins Co Pacific Bell Geotechncal Consultants Inc Pacific Bell IRA California Pacific Bell Regional Olt Pacific Bell Keller Robert W MD Pacific Bell Meridian Insurance Pacific Bell Pediatnc & Adolescent Psychological Pacific Bell Services Profile Insurance Brokers Inc Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 Page 42 City Council 18 — 1476 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Protective Life Ins Co Pacific Bell Scarbrough David L CPA Pacific Bell Student Insurance Pacific Bell Santa Ana Pacific Bell BUILDIN G IN DUS TRY AS S N OF S O Pacific Bell CALIF IN CORAN GE COUN TY CHAPTE R BurrBrown Research Corp Pacific Bell 1980 Sergheer Co The rl est dvlpr Pacific Telephone CALIF Pacific Telephone Building Industry Creit Asciation Pacific Telephone Evans Winthrop S atty Pacific Telephone tern West Inc Pacific Telephone Franchise America Corp Pacific Telephone Geotechnical Consultants Inc Pacific Telephone Jennings Adrienne Thome atty Pacific Telephone Land Larry E atty Pacific Telephone Mc Kibbin Michael K atty Pacific Telephone Montgomery Frank agcy mgr Pacific Telephone New World Fund Raising Pacific Telephone Plinski John A Pacific Telephone Pllschke W Jr Pacific Telephone Plisco David M Pacific Telephone Pliska RJ&TA Pacific Telephone Preferre Sheet Metal Pacific Telephone :ROS E MAN MARK E atty Pacific Telephone Singer Lewak Greenbaum & Goldstein Pacific Telephone Solomon & Mc Kibbin attys Pacific Telephone Solomon Mc Kibbin & Mayo attys Pacific Telephone Solomon Richard A atty Pacific Telephone Urban Futures Inc Pacific Telephone Village Homes Of California Pacific Telephone W ALUN PAUL J atty Pacific Telephone Wallin & Roseman attys Pacific Telephone Western National Bank Pacific Telephone 1975 Burr Brown Research Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Crudo Anthony F Grimes Crudo Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Roccaforte & OHarra attys Geotechnical Consultants Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Grimes Crudo Roccaforte & OHarra attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 6534209- 5 Page 43 City Council 18 — 1477 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Grimes Milton C Grimes Crudo Roccaforte Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. & OHarra attys Ofc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ofc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hoover Company The Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. INVESTORS REALTY & MANAGEMENT Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. INC JENNINGS HALDERMAN HOOD engnrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. OHarra Wade M Grimes Crudo Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Roccaforte & OHarra attys Padilla Paul Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Agency Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Roccaforte Douglas D Grimes Crudo Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Roccaforte & OHarra attys SAS Constructors Ltd Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Schwartz S Alan & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. T F E Industries A Dayco Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Tierra Engineering Company Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Urban Futures Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ofc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Youngblood Bobby D atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 HVH Engineering Constructors General Telephone Co., of California Halderman Hugh E General Telephone Co., of California Ofc General Telephone Co., of California Hood Clifford C General Telephone Co., of California Ofc General Telephone Co., of California Land Consultants of California Inc General Telephone Co., of California MASON MCDUFFIE CO OF SOUTHERN General Telephone Co., of California CALIFORNIA Menley & James Laboratories Ltd Division General Telephone Co., of California Office Middlebrook Anderson Co General Telephone Co., of California Nortec Computer Devices Inc General Telephone Co., of California President Homes Geni Ofc General Telephone Co., of California ROSE ASSOCIATES General Telephone Co., of California Yablonka Jerry General Telephone Co., of California BANKERS FUNDING CORP General Telephone Co., of California Communicators Unlimited General Telephone Co., of California Freers Rick General Telephone Co., of California Geotechnical Consultants Inc General Telephone Co., of California 6534209- 5 1 Page 44 City Council 18 — 1478 10/3/2023 FINDINGS 2004 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 TAXOFINANCIAL Haines Company SERVICES Haines Company NATION WIDEREAL Haines Company ESTATE YOUNGS Haines Company 2016 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 GEORGE BULAT Cole Information Services 2009 GEORGE BULAT Cole Information Services 1999 GEORGE BULAT Cole Information Services 2021 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 KLUMP CRAIG W CPA Cole Information Services LAWRENCE SPORTY Cole Information Services SHAGOURY ENTERPRISES Cole Information Services STONE F MICHAEL CPA Cole Information Services GRUVER ERIC W PHD Cole Information Services COCHRAN NICHOLAS J LAW OFFICE Cole Information Services OF PEREZ ROBERT T MD Cole Information Services SCARBROUGH DAVID L CPA & Cole Information Services COMPANY NUTTER MICHAEL G ATTORNEY Cole Information Services SANDOVAL RODMAN OD Cole Information Services S & N LABORATORIES Cole Information Services RAPP INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services JERRYS DOGS INC Cole Information Services PACIFIC PARTS SALES CO Cole Information Services RED CHIP INVESTMENT GROUP Cole Information Services J RV ENGINEERING INC Cole Information Services GODDU RONNALD Cole Information Services WELLNET MEDIVAN Cole Information Services TRANSPORTATION PRIMERICA Cole Information Services MORRIS ENGINEERING Cole Information Services VISION CENTERANGELES Cole Information Services AGAPE INSURANCE Cole Information Services SPORTY LAWRENCE D MD Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 45 City Council 18 — 1479 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2014 RONALD GODDU Cole Information Services SERVICES DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL Cole Information Services HEALTH 2009 JAYTEN Cole Information Services ROBERT T PEREZ MD Cole Information Services JEFFREY G VESELY Cole Information Services RAPP INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services RECORDING FOR THE BLIND & Cole Information Services DYSLEXIC BBK PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC SERVICES Cole Information Services F MICHAEL STONE ACCOUNTANCY Cole Information Services CORP NUTTER MICHAEL G ATTORNEY Cole Information Services ALLEN MULLINGS & ALLEN LLP Cole Information Services CENTER FOR THE FAMILY Cole Information Services PACIFIC PARTS SALES CO Cole Information Services DANIEL LEE PHD Cole Information Services K Y B GAS SHOCKS MANUFACTURER Cole Information Services REP RONALD P GODDU CPA Cole Information Services DAVID L SCARBOROUGH CERTIFIED Cole Information Services PUBLIC GERRI M OLIN Cole Information Services SPORTY LAWRENCE D MD Cole Information Services MORRIS ENGINEERING INC Cole Information Services S & N LABS Cole Information Services CRAIG W KLUMP CPA Cole Information Services COCHRAN NICHOLAS J LAW OFFICE Cole Information Services MICHAEL NUTTER Cole Information Services ROBERT PEREZ Cole Information Services LAWRENCE SPORTY Cole Information Services SCARBROUGH DAVID Cole Information Services 2004 JOAN KIEHL Cole Information Services MORRIS ENGINEERING INC Cole Information Services DEBORAH DORAZIO Cole Information Services ROBERT PEREZ Cole Information Services RONALD GODDU Cole Information Services CITHER DATA RESOURCES Cole Information Services LIAISON SOFTWARE CO Cole Information Services FRANCES SALLY Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 46 City Council 18 — 1480 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2004 RAPP INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services PRECISION MARKETING Cole Information Services S & N LAB Cole Information Services F MICHAEL STONE CPA Cole Information Services DAVID L SCARBROUGH Cole Information Services TITAN CONSULTING Cole Information Services ANITA K LAMPEL PHD Cole Information Services DANIEL LEE PHD Cole Information Services EL RANCHO PLAZA Cole Information Services OLIN GERRI M PHD Cole Information Services RONALD D GODDU Cole Information Services JAYTEN COMPTR SFTWR Cole Information Services PACIFIC PARTS SALES CO Cole Information Services ALLEN MULLINGS & ALLEN L L P Cole Information Services SECURE INVESTIGATIONS Cole Information Services RCRDNG FOR THE BLIND & DYSLXC Cole Information Services LAWRENCE SPORTY Cole Information Services 2002 BUILDING ALLENALLEN Haines Company ALLEN BARRY L Haines Company ALLEN DEBRA EATTY Haines Company ALLEN Haines Company MULLINGS&ALLEN Haines Company CALWESTSURVEYORS INC CENTER FOR THE Haines Company FAMILY CIPHER DATA Haines Company RESOURCES INC Haines Company DH CIVIL ENGINEERING Haines Company GODDU RONALD D CPA Haines Company HISPANICLEGAL SERV Haines Company KYBGASSHOCKS Haines Company MFR REP KAYEANDREALPHD Haines Company KIEHLJOANH Haines Company KLUMP CRAIGW CPA Haines Company KURTZSALLY Haines Company FRANCES ATTY L&J INSURANCE Haines Company SERVICE LEE DANIEL PHD Haines Company MORRISENGINEERING Haines Company MULLI NGSTJ Haines Company PACIFIC PARTS SALES Haines Company 6534209- 5 1 Page 47 City Council 18 — 1481 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 CO PEREZROBERTTMD Haines Company RAPP INSURANCE Haines Company SRVS RECORDING FORTHE Haines Company BLNDSDYSLXC S&N LABORATORIES Haines Company SCARBROUGH DAVIDi Haines Company CPA SECUREINVSTGNS Haines Company SPORTY LAWRENCE D Haines Company MO STONEF MICHAEL CPA Haines Company VESELY JEFFREY Haines Company 1999 SCARBROUGH DAVID Cole Information Services GODDU RONALD D CPA Cole Information Services ROBERT PEREZ Cole Information Services MICHAEL NUTTER Cole Information Services S & N LABORATORIES Cole Information Services CENTER FOR THE FAMILY Cole Information Services KAYE ANDREA L PHD THERAPIST Cole Information Services KLUMP CRAIG W CPA Cole Information Services STONE F MICHAEL CPA Cole Information Services MULLINGS THOMAS D JR ATTORNEY Cole Information Services ALLEN MULLINGS &ALLEN VESELY JEFFREY G CPA Cole Information Services LEE DANIEL PHD Cole Information Services KURTZ SALLY FRANCES ATTORNEY Cole Information Services ALLEN MULLINGS & ALLEN Cole Information Services SECURE INVESTIGATIONS Cole Information Services KYB SHOCKS MANUFACTURER Cole Information Services REPRESENTATIVES SPORTY LAWRENCE D MD Cole Information Services ERIC EQUITIES INCORPORATED Cole Information Services MEDITECH ELECTRONICS Cole Information Services RECORDING FOR THE BLIND & Cole Information Services DYSLEXIC HISPANIC LEGAL SERVICES Cole Information Services D H CIVIL ENGINEERING Cole Information Services ECONOMIC RESOURCE & Cole Information Services INVESTMENT CORPORATION PACIFIC PARTS SALES COMPANY Cole Information Services ERIC PROPERTIES Cole Information Services CALWEST SURVEYORS Cole Information Services INCORPORATED 6534209- 5 1 Page 48 City Council 18 — 1482 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 BRENNER MARTIN MD Cole Information Services BURCHETT DEAN ERIC EQUITIES Cole Information Services INCORPORATED LAWRENCE SPORTY Cole Information Services 1995 Allen Deborah E atty Portlgal Iammerton Pacific Bell & Allen Burchett Dean ERIC Equities Inc Pacific Bell Butler John K Pacific Bell Donahue Timothy J alty Partigal Pacific Bell Hammarton & Allen ERIC Equities Inc Pacific Bell ERIC Insurance Services Pacific Bell ERIC Properties Pacific Bell Educators Research & Investment Corp Pacific Bell Eric Equities Inc Pacific Bell Hammerton Jas R Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Aien Hedman Pat MFCC Pacific Bell Inman Douglas B Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen Kaye Andrea L Ph D Therapist Pacific Bell Kurtz Sally Frances atty Pacific Bell Majestic Diamonds Inc Pacific Bell Mestic Images Pacific Bell Mul Ong Thomas D Jraty Portigal Pacific Bell Hammerton& Aen Nielsen Ken W Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen Pacific Parts Sales Co Pacific Bell Pacific Psychological Services Pacific Bell Portigal Hammerton & Allen Pacific Bell Portigal Michael A Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen RAPP INSURANCE SERVICES Pacific Bell S & N Laboratories Pacific Bell Stone F Michael CPA Pacific Bell VIP Transport Inc Pacific Bell Basich Zoran atty 5445646 Pacific Bell 1994 BITTER, EDWARD J Cole Information Services KAYE, ANDREA Cole Information Services ALLEN, BARRY L Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 49 City Council 18 — 1483 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1994 BUTLER, JOHN K Cole Information Services MCCAY, JOHN F Cole Information Services STANFORD E SHAW Cole Information Services LARSEN, R G Cole Information Services STANTON KEVIN R Cole Information Services S&N LABORATORIES Cole Information Services MARY STANTON Cole Information Services EDWARD J BITTER PHD Cole Information Services KLUMP, CRAIG W Cole Information Services 1991 Allen Barry L Portigal Hammerton & Allen Pacific Bell Allen Deborah E atty Portigal Hammerton Pacific Bell & Allen Burchett Dean ERIC Equities Inc Pacific Bell Butler John K Pacific Bell Doherty Martin J Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen Donahue Timothy J atty Portigal Pacific Bell Hatomerton & Allen ERIC Insurance Services Pacific Bell ERIC Properties Pacific Bell Educators Research & Investment Corp Pacific Bell Eric Equities Inc Pacific Bell Hammerton Jas R Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen Heritage Capital Pacific Bell Lmdsley Stephen A Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen Lmdsley Vert Pacific Bell Marquez Stanton Mary Pacific Bell Marquez Stanton Mary Pacific Bell Mc Cay John F Pacific Bell Motor Car Dirs Assn Of Orange County Pacific Bell Mullings Thomas D Jr atty Portigal Pacific Bell Hammerton & Allen Nielsen Ken W Portlgal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen Orange County Dealer Services Pacific Bell Association PORTIGAL HAMMERTON&ALLEN Pacific Bell Rubin Lols K Ph D Psychotherapist Pacific Bell Rubin M Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 50 City Council 18 — 1484 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 S & N Laboratories Pacific Bell Salot Susan E Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen Salour Bahram Pacific Bell Salout All Pacific Bell SHAW STANFORD E atty Pacific Bell Slack Jas P Portigal Hammerton & Allen Pacific Bell Smlowlynn VPortigal Hamwrton&ABen Pacific Bell Stanton Kevin R Pacific Bell Stone F Michael CPA Pacific Bell Technology Institute Of Rehabilitation Pacific Bell Winfield Systems Inc Pacific Bell Winton Corp Pacific Bell Wittick Michael J Pacific Bell Workers Compensation Pacific Bell Portigal Michael A Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen 1986 Allen Barry L Portigal Hammerton & Alien Pacific Bell Aprahamian Richard J atty Pacific Bell Burchett Dean E RIC Equities Inc Pacific Bell Butler John Pacific Bell CH Trading Co Pacific Bell Casey Timothy R atty Pacific Bell Delson Financial Pacific Bell Doherty Martin J Portugal Hmnmmerton & Pacific Bell Allen Donahue Timothy J atty Portigal Pacific Bell Hammerton & Allen Dorey John B Pacific Bell E RIC Equities Inc Pacific Bell E RIC Insurance Services Pacific Bell E RIC Properties Pacific Bell EastWest Medical Supplies Inc Pacific Bell Educators Research & Investment Corp Pacific Bell Eric Equities Inc Pacific Bell Evans William D Pacific Bell Gaughan John S atty Pacific Bell Gray Robert H invicestmt counslr Pacific Bell Hammerton Jas R Portigal Hammerton & Pacific Bell Allen 6534209-5 1 Page 51 City Council 18 — 1485 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Intromark Inc Pacific Bell Invention Marketing Inc Pacific Bell Invention Submission Corp Pacific Bell lish Alan E CPA Pacific Bell Kopanke Walter J asty Pacific Bell Marquez Stanton Mary Worker s Pacific Bell Compensation Services Matheson Neil E Ph D Pacific Bell Mc Cay John F Pacific Bell Meyers Larry Ph D Pacific Bell Midland Mortgage Investors Pacific Bell Mulings Thomas D Jr atty Portigal Pacific Bell Hammerton & Allen Orange County Dealer Services Pacific Bell Association ORAN GE W OOD dvuprs Pacific Bell Portlgal Allan Portigal Hammerton & Allen Pacific Bell PORTIGAL HAMME RTON t ALLE N Pacific Bell Portigal Michael A Portigal Hammertons i Pacific Bell Allen Roberts & Sellers Agency Pacific Bell Roberts & Sellers Inc Pacific Bell Rusco Sales Inc Pacific Bell Shaw Stanford E atty Pacific Bell Simpson Peter Pacific Bell Slack Jas P Portigal Hammerton & Allen Pacific Bell Stanton Kevin R Worker s Compensation Pacific Bell Services Stone F Michael CPA Pacific Bell 1980 Aprhamian Richard J atty Pacific Telephone Brentwood Medical Services Pacific Telephone Brentwood Nurses Registry Pacific Telephone Burndy Corp Power Group Pacific Telephone Butler John Pacific Telephone CB Magnim Inc Pacific Telephone CALIFORN IA N UT HOUS E Pacific Telephone Delson Financial Pacific Telephone From Downey Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Dodds Jas M Portigal & Hammnerton Pacific Telephone attys 6534209-5 1 Page 52 City Council 18 — 1486 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Doherty Martin J Portigal & Hammerton Pacific Telephone attys Dyna Sear Ch Personnel Services Pacific Telephone E RIC Equities Inc Pacific Telephone E RIC PROPE RTIE S Pacific Telephone E IRS POBox 455 @Anaheim@ Pacific Telephone Educators Research & Investment Corp Pacific Telephone Eric Equities Inc Pacific Telephone Everman Construction Co Pacific Telephone Galasso Pauline acct Pacific Telephone Gallagher Edw CPA Pacific Telephone Golden Circle Secretarial Service Pacific Telephone Golden Circle Wedding Chapel Pacific Telephone Hammerton Jas R Portigal & Hammerton Pacific Telephone attys Hippensteel Thomas Marketing & Sales Pacific Telephone Hulls Vernetta S ins Pacific Telephone Iln Plaht Pallet Pacific Telephone Industrial Safety & Health Corp Pacific Telephone Irish Alan E CPA Pacific Telephone Nielson Ken Portigal&Hammerton attys Pacific Telephone Niles & Associates Pacific Telephone Orange County Dealer Services Pacific Telephone Association Ortega Chris Ins Pacific Telephone Ortega Insurance Agency Pacific Telephone Portigal Allan Portigal & Hammerton attys Pacific Telephone Portigal & Hammerton attys Pacific Telephone Portigal Michael A Portigal & Hammerton Pacific Telephone attys Professional Finding Pacific Telephone Roadman & Associates Inc Pacific Telephone Roadman Haey & Sharon GCool Brooklrt Pacific Telephone Roberts & Sellers Agency Pacific Telephone Roberts & Sellers Inc Pacific Telephone Scott E W Walter Pacific Telephone Simpson Peter Pacific Telephone Slack Jas P Portigal & Hammerton attys Pacific Telephone Taylor Fred R Ph D Pacific Telephone Tumor Institute Of Orange County Pacific Telephone 6534209-5 1 Page 53 City Council 18 — 1487 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 1 Ward Thomas W Jr Ph D Pacific Telephone I Ward Thos W Jr Ph D Pacific Telephone Wittick Michael J Pacific Telephone 1975 Allen Barry L Portigal & Hammerton attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Aprahamian Richard J atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Baker Ricki ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Billings Richard H atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Billings & Swatez A Professional Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. attys Cafferty John ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Cotham Jim ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Coutchie Ray ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Delson Financial Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dodds Jas M Portigal & Hammerton attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ERIC EQUITIES INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Educators Research & Investment Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Edwards Ray CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Eric Equities Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Everman Construction Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Santa Ana Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hammerton Jas R Portigal & Hammerton Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. attys Harcliff Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. J R C Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jessup Merrill G ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. KING BARRY DR Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Milfax Investigations Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Milford James invstgtr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Montejano & Aprahamian attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Montejano Rodolfo atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Nielson Ken Portigal & Hammerton attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Orange County Dealer Services Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Association Orangeco Investment Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Portigal Allan Portigal & Hammerton attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Portigal & Hammerton attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. PRIEST RICHARD D DR Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Radford Ray ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Schelin Wayne Ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Slack Jas P Portigal & Hammerton attys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 6534209-5 Page 54 City Council 18 — 1488 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Sorensen Robert ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Swatez Harold atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Taylor Fred R PhD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Santa Ana Ofc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. West Jim ins Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Day Marjorie W Portigal & Hammerton Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. attys 1970 Burrow C S Burrow Escrow Co General Telephone Co., of California BURROW Santa ANAHEIM Main Ofc General Telephone Co., of California CALIFORNIA STATE OF id FORESTRY General Telephone Co., of California DIV OF Contd Santa ANAHEIM General Telephone Co., of California CALIFORNIA STATE OF contmd PARKS General Telephone Co., of California & RECREATION DEPT Contd Orange Coast Area Contd Santa ANAHEIM General Telephone Co., of California CALIFORNIA STATE OF contmd PARKS General Telephone Co., of California & RECREATION DEPT Contd Orange Coast Area Contd Santa ANAHEIM General Telephone Co., of California CALIFORNIA STATE OF contmd PARKS General Telephone Co., of California & RECREATION DEPT Contd Orange Coast Area Contd Santa ANAHEIM General Telephone Co., of California American General Life Ins Co General Telephone Co., of California Billings Richard H atty General Telephone Co., of California Boswell Reed S Ph D General Telephone Co., of California CALIF NURSES ASSN DIST 16 General Telephone Co., of California CANNON ELECTRIC DIV ITT District General Telephone Co., of California Sales Engineering Office Channing Company Inc General Telephone Co., of California Danatron A Division of International General Telephone Co., of California Rectifier DARLEY GOBAR ASSOCIATES INC General Telephone Co., of California Employee Benefit Consultants Inc General Telephone Co., of California Employee Benefit Services General Telephone Co., of California Gentzler Riiss Associates Inc General Telephone Co., of California Great American Insurance Companies General Telephone Co., of California Harbison Co The General Telephone Co., of California HOWELL P A DR General Telephone Co., of California Income Taxes State General Telephone Co., of California Ingram Stan & Associates General Telephone Co., of California 6534209-5 1 Page 55 City Council 18 — 1489 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1970 International Recreation & Sports Inc General Telephone Co., of California Danatron Division General Telephone Co., of California Internat I Securities Corp General Telephone Co., of California Johnson Douglas CPA General Telephone Co., of California Jostens Inc Commercial Regional Office General Telephone Co., of California Jostens Inc Scholastic Regional Office General Telephone Co., of California MARBLE MORTGAGE COMPANY General Telephone Co., of California DIVISION OF UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK ri est loans Mc Glade Leo enonr General Telephone Co., of California Nurses Registry General Telephone Co., of California Orange County Nursery Inc General Telephone Co., of California NURSES REGISTRY General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Co General Telephone Co., of California Russ Gentzler Associates Inc General Telephone Co., of California Stan Ingram & Associates General Telephone Co., of California STAN INGRAM & ASSOCIATES General Telephone Co., of California Swates Harold atty General Telephone Co., of California Taylor Fred R Ph D General Telephone Co., of California UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK Contd General Telephone Co., of California SANTA ANA OFFICES Contd Warner & Main Ofc CALIFORNIA BANK General Telephone Co., of California Weaver Vern Ins General Telephone Co., of California Woods Insurance Agoy General Telephone Co., of California 2027 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1960 Pack VC KI 7 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 2030 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2014 SOUTH COAST METRO REALTY Cole Information Services CONSTANZA MOSSAD Cole Information Services OUTREACH CONCERN Cole Information Services VALENSTEIN RICHARD AGENCY Cole Information Services BEATRIZ HUERTA Cole Information Services BRODESKE LORI Cole Information Services COLLINS CONSTRUCTION & Cole Information Services DEVELOPMENT DICKSON SHARON MSW LCSW Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 56 City Council 18 — 1490 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2014 ORANGE COUNTY HYPNOTIC CENTER Cole Information Services INTERLINK FORWARDING CORP Cole Information Services SORIAS TAX SERVICES Cole Information Services NATIONAL ROOF MANAGEMENT Cole Information Services SERVICES CAPALDI FREDRICK P & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY CHIAO Cole Information Services ROSCHMANN JANE MA MFCC Cole Information Services PATTERSON ROBERT LICENSED Cole Information Services PSYCHOLOGI SOFTUCRAFT Cole Information Services ACU PARTS INC Cole Information Services FOY BOB Cole Information Services AWS CONSULTANTS INC Cole Information Services MOSSAD CONSTANZA PHD Cole Information Services SPATZ BARRY CHAS COUNSLR Cole Information Services THOM F CAVALLI Cole Information Services FAX LINE FOR SENIOR HELPER Cole Information Services ARRIBARR INCOME TAX SERVICES Cole Information Services ANGIE DICKSON PHD Cole Information Services LIFESTREAM HOPE & WELLNESS Cole Information Services CENTER ROSILES FINANCIAL GROUP Cole Information Services PUGH JAMES MARSHALL PHD Cole Information Services NORTH CREST REALTY Cole Information Services BROWN MARYANN MFT Cole Information Services DESIGNWORK STUDIOS Cole Information Services THOM CAVALLI Cole Information Services MARYANN BROWN Cole Information Services AGUEDA JIMENEZ Cole Information Services JEFF MOGHARRAB Cole Information Services ECHEVARRIA ELSIE Cole Information Services DICKSON ANGIE Cole Information Services ESAD PETIC Cole Information Services SHARON DICKSON Cole Information Services GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC Cole Information Services 2009 SORIAS TAX SERVICES Cole Information Services KAREN CALKINS Cole Information Services ERNEST WAGNER MD Cole Information Services ZENTRUM ASSOCS Cole Information Services 6534209-5 Page 57 City Council 18 — 1491 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 FUTURETOUCH CORP Cole Information Services ARRIBARR INCOME TAX SERVICE Cole Information Services ENVIRONMENTAL C & R Cole Information Services GILLETTE LANGTON HAGNER & KAZER Cole Information Services HISPANIC LEGAL SERVICES Cole Information Services ALLIANCE RETTIG LLC Cole Information Services PHYSIO DIAGNOSTICS INC Cole Information Services ASIA CONNECTIONS INC Cole Information Services RICHARD VALENSTEIN INSURANCE Cole Information Services AGENCY JAMES MARSHALL PUGH Cole Information Services BARRY SPATZ Cole Information Services WILLIAMS & ASSIOCATES INC Cole Information Services MDEFCU Cole Information Services KAREN J CALKINS ESQ Cole Information Services SUPERIOR ACCOUNTING Cole Information Services YOUNGS TRADING INC Cole Information Services SLIDE A SHELF Cole Information Services CAPALDI & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services MARI HISPANIC MARKETING RESEAR Cole Information Services AWS ROOFING & WATERPROOFING Cole Information Services CONSULTA MUTUAL DIVERSIFIED EMP FED CR UN Cole Information Services BLUE LENDING INC Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY HYPNOTIC CENTER Cole Information Services OUTREACH CONCERN INC Cole Information Services AMERICAN SENIOR FUNDING CORP Cole Information Services INBOX GRAPHX Cole Information Services FJA FINANCIAL SERVICES Cole Information Services THE LAW OFFICES JUDITH S LELAND Cole Information Services PATTERSON ROBERT LICENSED Cole Information Services PSYCHOLOGI FARHAD KASHEFI Cole Information Services THOM CAVALLI Cole Information Services MARYANN BROWN Cole Information Services BOB FOY Cole Information Services ECHEVARRIA ELSIE Cole Information Services DICKSON ANGIE Cole Information Services AGNES DICKSON Cole Information Services ESAD PETIC Cole Information Services 6534209-5 Page 58 City Council 18 — 1492 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 ALLIANCE EXCHANGE GROUP INC Cole Information Services 2004 COURT LINK Cole Information Services FIREFIGHTERS FUNDING INC Cole Information Services JURIS NET Cole Information Services WPSI INC Cole Information Services AWS ROOFING & WATERPROOFING Cole Information Services SPECTRUM MERCHANT SERVICES Cole Information Services LANGTON KAZER LAW OFFICE Cole Information Services LAW OFFICES OF LANGTON & KAZER Cole Information Services LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN A RDRGZ Cole Information Services SUPEROR ACCOUNTING Cole Information Services THOMAS BOND & ASSOCS Cole Information Services VELA SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT Cole Information Services RHEINHEIMER RANDALL MFCC Cole Information Services RODERICK PONATH MD Cole Information Services MULTI INTERNATIONAL MARKETING Cole Information Services INC ASPEN ASSMNT & TRTMNT SRVC Cole Information Services BLUE DOT DESIGN Cole Information Services CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION O Cole Information Services SOUTHWEST FINANCIAL Cole Information Services ALLIANCE ESCROW INC Cole Information Services ALLIANCE EXCHANGE GROUP INC Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY ON TRACK Cole Information Services WEST COAST REALTY & MORTGAGE Cole Information Services INC ANGER MNGMNT FOR VLNC OFNDR Cole Information Services COLOR IMAGE Cole Information Services SUPERIOR FLOORING INC Cole Information Services OUTREACH CONCERN INC Cole Information Services IMAGE ID SOLUTIONS Cole Information Services FIRST USA MORTGAGE LOANS Cole Information Services SANTA ANA CLG Cole Information Services BRILES ASSOCS LAW Cole Information Services DEANNCO FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES Cole Information Services SLIDE A SHELF Cole Information Services SOFTUCRAFT LLC Cole Information Services STEPHAN RODRIGUEZ LAW OFFICES Cole Information Services ROBERT PATTERSON PSY D Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 59 City Council 18 — 1493 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2004 GENESIS APPRAISAL CO Cole Information Services CHARLES O UNDERWOOD CPA Cole Information Services MARI HISPANIC RESEARCH Cole Information Services IMAGE ID SOLUTIONS Cole Information Services ALLWEST ENVIRONMENTAL INC Cole Information Services BLUE DOT DESIGN & MARKETING Cole Information Services MUNOZ SERVICES Cole Information Services MUTUAL DIVERSIFIED EMPLY FDRL Cole Information Services MARIELA LOPEZ Cole Information Services JAMES PUGH Cole Information Services ROBERT KAZER Cole Information Services ESAD PETIC Cole Information Services 2002 COUNCIL MULTI INTERNATIONAL Haines Company MARKETING MUTUAL DVERSFD Haines Company EMPFEDCRUN OUTREACH CONCERN Haines Company PUGHJAMES Haines Company MARSHALLPHD RINALDI ROBERTA L Haines Company +SANFORDROSE Haines Company ASSOCTS SANTA ANA SPATZBARRYC Haines Company STCLAIRJESSICA MFT Haines Company THOMPSON BRENT M Haines Company ATTY TROSTJONATHAN M Haines Company WPSIINC Haines Company YOUNGS TRASING INC Haines Company BUILDING ALLIANCE EXCH Haines Company GROUP ASSOC IATESSANIFORD Haines Company ROSE ASSOC IATESSANFORD Haines Company ROSE ASSOCIATESSAN FORD Haines Company ROSE BASTIAN MARY ALICE Haines Company MFCC BRENT MTHOMPSON Haines Company CAPALDIFREDK Haines Company P&ASC + CLAXTON COUNSELING Haines Company CENTER COLOR IMAGETHE Haines Company it CROHNS&COLITIS Haines Company FNDTNOFAMER D 9 R SERVICESCO Haines Company DEANNCO FINANCIAL Haines Company ENTERPRISES DEANNCO FINANCIAL Haines Company ENTERPRISES DESIGNWORK Haines Company STUDIOS 6534209-5 1 Page 60 City Council 18 — 1494 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 DIVORCE EDCTN&FMLY Haines Company CNSLGCT FILES BARBARA Haines Company FIREFIGHTERS Haines Company FUNDING GENESISAPPRAISALS Haines Company INDEP REALTY Haines Company CAPITOL CORP JSRESOURCESINC Haines Company JURIS NET Haines Company JUSTMORTGAGECO Haines Company LAWOFFICESOF Haines Company STEVE SGOHARI LEGALTAX Haines Company DEFENDERS INC c MARIHSPNCMKTG Haines Company RSRCHi FLDSV Haines Company MINORITY BUSINESS Haines Company 1999 COASTVIEW FINANCIAL Cole Information Services BOB FOY Cole Information Services MARTINEZ ARTHUR LAW OFFICES OF Cole Information Services LAW OFFICES OF RAMIN SANJAR Cole Information Services DEPOT INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services DONAHUE & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services MARTINEZ ARTHUR LAW OFFICES OF Cole Information Services JOSEPH YVES GEORGES LAW Cole Information Services OFFICES OF C M MANAGEMENT COMPANY Cole Information Services LOPEZ IMMIGRATION Cole Information Services PIES ENVIRONMENTAL Cole Information Services INCORPORATED WMA FINANCIAL SERVICES & Cole Information Services SOLUTIONS A PLUS REAL ESTATE Cole Information Services TIPPING DONALD D CPA Cole Information Services PIMENTAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DESIGN Cole Information Services ALAMEDA CAPITAL Cole Information Services CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF Cole Information Services AMER ORNG CNTY CHAPTER HORIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES Cole Information Services RINALDI ROBERTA LCSW Cole Information Services KEYES MIKE & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services MINORITY BUSINESS COUNCIL Cole Information Services CAPALDI FREDRICK P & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services ALLWEST ENVIRONMENTAL Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 61 City Council 18 — 1495 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 PROFESSIONAL IMAGE Cole Information Services MUTUAL DIVERSIFIED EMPLOYEES Cole Information Services FEDERAL CREDIT UNION MAILAWAY Cole Information Services S2 INTERNATL GROUP Cole Information Services INCORPORATED GENESIS APPRAISALS Cole Information Services CARPET MEDIC CLEANING COMPANY Cole Information Services CHITLIK & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE Cole Information Services SERVICES IMMEDIATE IMPRESSIONS Cole Information Services SPATZ BARRY CHARLES COUNSLR Cole Information Services KEYES LINDA BRKR Cole Information Services VENEGAS JOE INSURANCE SERVICE Cole Information Services ALEJANDRA VELASCO Cole Information Services REHABILITATION SERVICES T L C PERSONNEL INCORPORATED Cole Information Services SQLNET INTEGRATE SOLUTION Cole Information Services CORPORATION UNITED CAPITAL Cole Information Services M & A MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED Cole Information Services COLOR IMAGE THE Cole Information Services DEANNCO FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES Cole Information Services SLIDE A SHELF Cole Information Services MARTINS CLEANING Cole Information Services MARI HISPANIC MARKETING Cole Information Services RESEARCH & FIELD SERVICES LYON PATROL Cole Information Services ALLIANCE EXCHANGE GROUP Cole Information Services HILLVIEW ACRES FOSTER FAMILY Cole Information Services AGENCY DRY -RITE CARPET CLEANING Cole Information Services PUGH JAMES MARSHALL PHD Cole Information Services FIREFIGHTERS FUNDING Cole Information Services DESIGNWORK STUDIOS Cole Information Services PHYSIO DIAGNOSTICS Cole Information Services INCORPORATED OUTREACH CONCERN Cole Information Services PRINCESS LIMOUSINE SERVICE Cole Information Services G & M COMPLIANCE Cole Information Services RICHARD RODRIGUEZ Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 62 City Council 18 — 1496 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 ECHEVARRIA ELSIE Cole Information Services DICKSON ANGIE Cole Information Services ESAD PETIC Cole Information Services AGNES DICKSON Cole Information Services FARHAD KASHEFI Cole Information Services MARYANN BROWN Cole Information Services PONATH RODERICK D MD Cole Information Services 1995 Accident Claim Experts Inc Pacific Bell Ackerman Arthur F atty Pacific Bell Alisto Engineering Group Inc Pacific Bell All Legal Services Pacific Bell Alliance Exchange Group Pacific Bell America First Residential & Investments Pacific Bell American Mutual Life Ins Pacific Bell Aniel Enterprises Pacific Bell Aspen Woods Creekside Office Center Pacific Bell Astro Auto Pacific Bell Bastlan Mary Alice MFCC Pacific Bell California Market Research Pacific Bell California Printers Magazine Pacific Bell California Publications Pacific Bell CARTER JOHN D PHD Pacific Bell Castorino Heer Margarita Pacific Bell Community National Life Pacific Bell Comprehensive Nutrition Services Pacific Bell Date Code Pacific Bell Deannco Financial Enterprises Pacific Bell Demarco Veronica MFCC Pacific Bell Destra Frank & Mandi Pacific Bell de Strakosch John Pacific Bell Disaster Survival Products Pacific Bell Divorce Education & Family Counseling Pacific Bell Center DONAHUE & ASSOCIATES Pacific Bell Dowdall Terry R Pacific Bell Elsenberg Insurance Agency Pacific Bell Emergency Products Pacific Bell Equity Fast Fund Financial Pacific Bell Exier Marilyn Ruth atty Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 63 City Council 18 — 1497 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 Files Barbara MFCC Pacific Bell First Century Realty Pacific Bell Garman Wm F atty Pacific Bell Goddu Ronald DCPA Pacific Bell Hallowell Consulting Services Pacific Bell Hispanic Legal Services Pacific Bell Horizon Financial Services Pacific Bell John Jilma ins agnt Pacific Bell Joseph Yves Georges Law Offices Of Pacific Bell Kannard Donna Ph D Pacific Bell Keyes Linda brkr Pacific Bell Keyes Mike & Associates Pacific Bell Manri Hispanic Marketing Research & Pacific Bell Field Services Masters Healthcare Pacific Bell Mind Body Development Pacific Bell Morgan Jones Associates Pacific Bell Nelson Ed Professional Astrologer Pacific Bell Nova Group The Pacific Bell Outreach Concern Pacific Bell Pacific Mortgage Group Inc Pacific Bell Passage Hypnotherapy & NLUP Pacific Bell Peters Donn psyd Pacific Bell Physio Diagnostics Inc Pacific Bell Preferred Mortgage & Investments Pacific Bell Preparedness Products Pacific Bell Pugh James Marshall Ph D Pacific Bell Reddix Gerald D Psy D mfcc Pacific Bell Rheinheimer Randall C MFCC Pacific Bell Rietman Consultants Pacific Bell Ruth Amy MD Pacific Bell Safety Eqgpment Pacific Bell Skudstad Michael atty at law Pacific Bell Slinkard Rick MFCC & Associates Pacific Bell Spats Barry Chas counslr Pacific Bell Successful Self Improvement Inc Pacific Bell Systems Engineering Internatl Inc Pacific Bell TLC Personnel Inc Pacific Bell TOSA Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 64 City Council 18 — 1498 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 Takahashi Graphic Design Pacific Bell Tech Pro Pacific Bell Teresas Spanish Interpreting & Pacific Bell Translation Service Trost Jonathan MFCC Pacific Bell Verge Ronald E Ph D Pacific Bell Vesey Jeffrey G CPA Pacific Bell Westfirst Mortgage Of America Pacific Bell Westrav Marketing Pacific Bell Xerox Copi er Products Group Pacific Bell 1994 GODDU, RONALD D Cole Information Services RODENAS, ANTHONY Cole Information Services DESTRAKOSCH, JOHN Cole Information Services FILES, BARBARA Cole Information Services ROKER, SUSAN M Cole Information Services CASTORINOHERR, M Cole Information Services VERGE, RONALD E Cole Information Services ACKERMAN, ARTHUR F Cole Information Services STARK, AMY L Cole Information Services RIVERA, G L Cole Information Services AMER BUSINESS CNSLT Cole Information Services ARTHUR THOMPSON Cole Information Services COMP U KIDS Cole Information Services OLIVIA FRETWELL Cole Information Services BRADFORD FUNDING Cole Information Services PASSAGE HYPNOTHERAPY CTR Cole Information Services EARTHQUAKE PRODUCTS Cole Information Services FIRST CENTURY REALTY Cole Information Services ASPEN WOODS LEASING Cole Information Services COLLEGE FNCL SLTNS Cole Information Services L D M GROUP INC Cole Information Services ACCIDENT CLAIM EXPERTS INC Cole Information Services PSYCHOSYNTHESIS CENTER Cole Information Services MARI HISPANIC MARKETING RSRCH Cole Information Services W C S Cole Information Services MARGARITA CASTORINO HEER Cole Information Services KHAN BOOKKEEPING & TAX SVC Cole Information Services IN SYNC DATA Cole Information Services RANDALL C RHEINHEIMER Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 65 City Council 18 — 1499 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1994 NAIMARK MORTGAGE Cole Information Services BARBARA FILES Cole Information Services GERALD D REDDIX Cole Information Services HISPANIC LEGAL SVC Cole Information Services BOLIVIAN SERVICE IMPORT Cole Information Services SPECIALTY MEDICAL PRODUCTS Cole Information Services PUGH JAS M PHD Cole Information Services CLASSIC COURIER Cole Information Services KHAN BOOKKEEPING&TX Cole Information Services JON TROST Cole Information Services AMY RUTH MD Cole Information Services CITIZENS SCHOLARSHIP FNDTN Cole Information Services EQUITY FAST FUND FINANCIAL Cole Information Services ELIZABETH C LAZAROFF MD Cole Information Services BRENNANS INTERIORS Cole Information Services MORGAN JONES ASSOC Cole Information Services M K M ENTERPRISES Cole Information Services WATTERLOND CONSULTING Cole Information Services BENCH MARK SVC Cole Information Services VERONICA DEMARCO Cole Information Services DIVORCE EDUCATION & FAMILY Cole Information Services WESTFIRST MORTGAGE OF AMERICA Cole Information Services ANTHONY RODENAS Cole Information Services LEGAL RIGHTS SVC Cole Information Services MKM ENTERPRISES Cole Information Services WE ENTERPRISES Cole Information Services BARRY C SPATZ Cole Information Services JOHN D CARTER PHD Cole Information Services MARIN BUILDING MAINTENANCE Cole Information Services INVESTORS LIFE OF NEBRASKA Cole Information Services PEREZ F J LCSW Cole Information Services BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD Cole Information Services FUN HI SC REUNIONS Cole Information Services MARY ALICE BASTIAN Cole Information Services CRAIG W KLUMP Cole Information Services ACKERMAN A F ATTY Cole Information Services SAFE & SECURE SECURITY SYSTEMS Cole Information Services ORANGE CO CENTERFLD Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 66 City Council 18 — 1500 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1994 EMERGENCY PRODUCTS Cole Information Services PACIFIC PSYCHOLOGICAL CTR Cole Information Services CLASSICA EN REGAL Cole Information Services FRETWELL, OLIVIA Cole Information Services RUTH, AMY Cole Information Services SPATZ, BARRY C Cole Information Services DEMARCO, V Cole Information Services 1991 Brennans Interiors Pacific Bell Calco Financial Pacific Bell Campbell Larry N CPA Pacific Bell Clarke Kathy Inc Model & Talent Agency Pacific Bell Community National Life Pacific Bell Community Orthopedic Medical Group Pacific Bell Concepts Unlimited Pacific Bell Data Code Pacific Bell Deannco Financial Enterprises Pacific Bell DONAHUE & ASSOCIATES Pacific Bell Fretwell Olivia MFCC Pacific Bell Goddu Ronald D CPA Pacific Bell Horizon Financial Services Pacific Bell Keyes Mike & Associates Pacific Bell Keyes Paul Pacific Bell Keyes Piano Tuning Pacific Bell Keyes RE Pacific Bell Lebanoff Mc Knight Development Pacific Bell Masters lealthcare Pacific Bell Morgan Jones Associates Pacific Bell New Concept Computer Services Pacific Bell Nu Concept Computer Services Pacific Bell Pacific Mortgage Group Inc Pacific Bell Pacific Parts Sales Co Pacific Bell Physio Diagnostics Inc Pacific Bell Pugh James Marshall Ph D Pacific Bell Pugh Jm Pacific Bell Pugh John Pacific Bell Pugh Kenneth G Pacific Bell Pugh LAdair Pacific Bell Rena Ware Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 67 City Council 18 — 1501 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Rena Ware International Pacific Bell Rietman Consultants Pacific Bell Rivera Georgians L LCSW Pacific Bell Ryan Hewitt FMD Pacific Bell Safe Development Corp Pacific Bell Safe Guard Equities Inc Pacific Bell Sayco Construction Pacific Bell Sharp Personnel & Search Pacific Bell Spatz Barry Chas counslr Pacific Bell Summit National Life Pacific Bell Sunwest Sales Company Pacific Bell Supplement The Pacific Bell Sutter Corp Pacific Bell Verge Ronald E Pacific Bell Vesely Jeffrey G CPA Pacific Bell Wenner Gdman Leasing Pacific Bell Westfirst Mortgage Of America Pacific Bell A RB International Pacific Bell Accident Claim Experts Inc Pacific Bell American National Mortgage Pacific Bell American Technologies Credit Pacific Bell Aspen Woods Leasing Office Pacific Bell Avi Eisenberg Medical Agency Pacific Bell 1986 Adams Lee Pacific Bell Allen Group The Pacific Bell American Medical Facilities Inc Pacific Bell Atlantic Pacific Security Mgmt Agency Pacific Bell B Ryan Snyder Co Inc Pacific Bell Bishop Joyce Ph D Pacific Bell Bona Fide Mortgage Pacific Bell Bookin Linda J MA Pacific Bell Frost Don Ins Agcy Inc Pacific Bell California AMVE T The Pacific Bell California Fireman Pacific Bell California Leaguer The Pacific Bell Capital Western Inc Pacific Bell Clarke Kathy Inc Modeling Agency Pacific Bell Cohn David M Attorney atty Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 68 City Council 18 — 1502 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Computer Print Systems Pacific Bell Continuing Medical Education Inc Pacific Bell Don Frost Insurance Agency Inc Pacific Bell El Mar Sales Co Pacific Bell First Security Realty Service West Pacific Bell Genovese & Robbins Marketing & Pacific Bell Insurance Services Inc Goddu Ronald D CPA Pacific Bell Group Pacific Bell Gray Douglas Pacific Bell Greenzang Ted MD Pacific Bell Hooper Holmes Inc Pacific Bell Horizon Financial Corp Pacific Bell Intercoastal Capital Corp Pacific Bell Judges Marshalls & Constables Magazine Pacific Bell Kaplan Larry S atty Pacific Bell Keyes Mike & Associates Pacific Bell Love Roy E ins agcy Pacific Bell Love Roy E Insurance Agency Pacific Bell Masters Healthcare Pacific Bell Midas Systems Corp Pacific Bell Moltz Red & Associates Inc Pacific Bell National Association Of Senior Citizens Pacific Bell Newport Beach Property Management Inc Pacific Bell Noble Nancy P Ph D Pacific Bell Nova Industrial Sales Pacific Bell Oak Tree Associates The Pacific Bell Official Publications Inc Pacific Bell Olave Realty Investments Pacific Bell Orange County Health Associates Pacific Bell P G A Systems Pacific Bell PORAC Law Enforcement News Pacific Bell PORTAME DIC Health Care Pacific Bell PORTAME DIC A DIVIS ION OF HOOPE Pacific Bell R HOLME S IN C Pugh James Marshall Ph D Pacific Bell Q S I International Pacific Bell Q S I Marketing Co hith & naturl prods Pacific Bell Quadtel Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 69 City Council 18 — 1503 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Ro Mar Petroleum Pacific Bell Romar Petroleum Pacific Bell Rosenbaum Dorothy S Ph D Pacific Bell RUBALCAVA ROLAN D G atty Pacific Bell Santa Ana Tustin Hypnosis Center Pacific Bell Schemme Horst K Real Estate Pacific Bell Investments Schwartz John L MD Inc Pacific Bell Skin Institute Of America Pacific Bell Snyder B Ryan Co Inc Pacific Bell Sosna Marilyn MD Pacific Bell Spatz Barry Chas counslr Pacific Bell Stars And Stripes Pacific Bell Strahan Advertising Inc Pacific Bell Summit National Life Pacific Bell 1980 Closson Charles Dr Pacific Telephone Club World Pacific Telephone District Group Sales Pacific Telephone Connor Michael E Ph D Pacific Telephone Continuing Medical Education Inc Pacific Telephone i Coyle Bonnie Jeanette rhma Pacific Telephone Crow Jeff Pacific Telephone DATA OVE RLOAD Pacific Telephone Dave Mayer& Son Pacific Telephone Durst Lee H atty Pacific Telephone Environmental Engineering Pacific Telephone Fassnacht D C & Assgciates Inc Pacific Telephone Gourmet International Pacific Telephone Great American Car Wash Systems Pacific Telephone Hirz Ronald H MD Pacific Telephone Hooper Holmes Inc Pacific Telephone Insight Dynamics Corp Pacific Telephone Insight For Living Pacific Telephone Jack Dil I Associates executive search Pacific Telephone Jack Donald M 3513 Sunny Wood Dr Pacific Telephone @Fullerton@ Judges Marshalls & Constables Magazine Pacific Telephone Keyes Mike & Associates Pacific Telephone L & I Mana ement Services Inc Pacific Telephone 6534209-5 1 Page 70 City Council 18 — 1504 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 J Len Al Bike Lok Co Inc Pacific Telephone Lerner Shops Real Estate Div Pacific Telephone Winchester Electronics Pacific Telephone Love Roy E Insurance Agency Pacific Telephone Med Logic Systems Pacific Telephone Midas Systems Corp Pacific Telephone Frnm @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Miller Roy N Pacific Telephone Newport Beach Property Managemient Inc Pacific Telephone Official Publications Inc Pacific Telephone Oxford Chemicals Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone PORAC Law Enforcement News Pacific Telephone Pathfinder Mortgage Corporation Pacific Telephone Agency Pacific Telephone Portamedic A Division Of Hooper Holmes Pacific Telephone Inc Portante V Pacific Telephone Rawuka John R pub acct Pacific Telephone I I Pacific Telephone J & Associates etxectv search Pacific Telephone Scherrer Engineering Pacific Telephone Schwartz John L MD Inc Pacific Telephone Sir Law Services Pacific Telephone Snyder B Ryan Co Inc Pacific Telephone Sosna Marilyn MD Pacific Telephone Spatz Barry Chas counslr Pacific Telephone Strahan James L Advertising Inc Pacific Telephone Stralian Jas V @Yorba Linda@ 7 Pacific Telephone Toch Chandler Linda atty Pacific Telephone Torres Richard A atty Pacific Telephone Underwood Chas CPA Pacific Telephone Verex Assurance Inc Pacific Telephone W IKI & LOUIS IN C Pacific Telephone York Environmental Engineering Pacific Telephone York Eve Pacific Telephone I AS FM Organization Pacific Telephone Allen Group The Pacific Telephone American Benefits Ltd Pacific Telephone 6534209-5 1 Page 71 City Council 18 — 1505 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Armendariz Richard C Atty At Law Pacific Telephone Armendariz Ruben & Patricia Pacific Telephone I Avcon Data Systems Pacific Telephone Balfour Gery B J Pacific Telephone Balfour Gloria ........................... Pacific Telephone Balfour Guest Homes Pacific Telephone Ball Durst & Reinglass Law Offices Pacific Telephone Ball Robt M atty Pacific Telephone BE RN ARDI THOS J CLU BROKE RAGE Pacific Telephone MAN AGE R California AMVE T The Pacific Telephone California Angels Baseball Club Pacific Telephone California Fireman Pacific Telephone California Leaguer The Pacific Telephone California Pacific Development Pacific Telephone 1975 Aaron Hart Center Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Aspen Woods Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. BARNETT DONALD H ENTERPRISES Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Berryman Mohle & Stephenson Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Associates consltnts California Pacific Development Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. CHRISTESON CO dvlprs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. District Group Sales Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Creative Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Davis Randy C MA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Flo Tite Derbi Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Group Process Institute Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hamamura D T optmtrst Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Investors Property Management Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. JM Secretarial Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jacobson Everett S PhD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kemp Betty M & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kepford Keith L optmtrst Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Keyes Mike & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. LADIMER ROBT psyclgst Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Limbert Cheryl Insurance Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MacFarlane & MacFarlane attys at law Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MacFarlane Robert A MacFarlane & Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MacFarlane attys at law 6534209-5 1 Page 72 City Council 18 — 1506 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 MacFarlane William A MacFarlane & Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MacFarlane attys at law McCrea Realty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Merit Mortgage Services Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pickering Wm C PHD clinical psyclgst Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Smith Randall G & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Southern California Gas Air Conditioning Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Engineering Cc Stanton Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Southwest Properties Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Thompson Howard F & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Townsend Jeannette K Phd Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Utility Piping Design Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Van Winkle & Cc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Westlear Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 2038 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 2039 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1980 Coast Cities Leasing Pacific Telephone 2041 E 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1941 Gardiner J A atty Southern California Telephone Co. E 4UH 2001 E 4UH Year Uses Source 1991 arruh Dav Id LCPA Pacific Bell GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 250 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 2002 8 BUILDING DATABASE Haines Company MARKETING GROUP Haines Company INC DIVERSIFIED Haines Company 6534209- 5 1 Page 73 City Council 18 — 1507 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 SERVICES INC HERONROBERTEDC Haines Company 1ST E Haines Company 4TH E Haines Company FINANCIAL 9 ERVICES HAIR 80 R Haines Company NURSING 1980 Dyess Robert W Jr Mac Farlane & Mac Pacific Telephone Farlane attys 501 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 2002 CPA AMY ROBERT C JR CP Haines Company CORP AMY CHRISTOPHER Haines Company AMYACCOUATNCY Haines Company FLECK RESEARCH Haines Company MCEQROUP Haines Company 540 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 2002 BUILDING BUNES ROBERT MMD Haines Company CLARK Haines Company FEBGUS&ASCTS COMNCTM ASSETS Haines Company COUNTRYWIDESERV Haines Company DEMARCO VERONICA Haines Company D 03 HOSPITALITY Haines Company EASTERNSOFTWARE Haines Company CORP ESSEX MORTGAGE Haines Company GRAPHICS&ADS Haines Company HIGHLANDS PROGRAM Haines Company THE HUTCHIG 1 SRENDELB Haines Company KANNARDDONNAPHD Haines Company UFECARE Haines Company RESOURCES INC MACLE00 ROBERT Haines Company P MD MATTHEWSWE 0 DY Haines Company AT 7 YS re NAGY WILLIAM Haines Company R&ASSOCIATES CIRS PACIFICORCA Haines Company CORP PASSAGE Haines Company HYPNOT 8 RPY PRIMECAPITAL Haines Company FINANCIAL ROYALALUANCE Haines Company ASSOCIATES INC r ROYALALLIANCE Haines Company 6534209-5 Page 74 City Council 18 — 1508 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 ASSOCIATES INC RSGINC Haines Company r SANDLERSALES Haines Company INSTITUTE SILERDAN Haines Company TEATS GEORGECPA Haines Company TH 1 RDSTREETCUNIC Haines Company WARDELLDELORES Haines Company PHD WHEELER Haines Company CONSTRUCTION YGLESIASPPHD Haines Company 1980 Ofc Pacific Telephone 550 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 2002 SCRTY&NVSTGTN WHEATLEYROBERT Haines Company PINKERTON Haines Company LAW OFFICE OF Haines Company 1986 Monarch Robt D atty Pacific Bell N 4TH ST 2002 N 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1975 Vignola Michael D Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 2006 N 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1975 Frisbie Raymond E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 2018 N 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1975 Erkkila B B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 2032 N 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1975 San Filippo Vincent Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 2038 N 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1975 Honda Toshikatsu Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 6534209-5 1 Page 75 City Council 18 — 1509 10/3/2023 2042 N 4TH ST Year Uses 1975 Smith Timothy B 2054 N 4TH ST Year Uses 1975 Harrison Carl W N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR FINDINGS Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 250 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 2014 MATERIAL & CONTRACT SERVICES Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY SOUTHERN Cole Information Services BAPTIST ASSN TEARS THOMAS ATTORNEY AT LAW Cole Information Services MANCIA SUSY LAW OFFICES OF Cole Information Services US TAX ASSISTORS DAVID WIDERMAN Cole Information Services LAW OFFICES OF WINTERBOTHAM Cole Information Services PARHAM T SMITH DOUGLAS SANDERSON ATTY Cole Information Services GROSS MARTIN D LAW OFFICE OF Cole Information Services BLACKMAN LAWFIRM THE Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services ARCHITECTRONIX INC Cole Information Services GOKOO ROBT J LAW OFFICES Cole Information Services 2009 CONOR KINNEY Cole Information Services APPEL GARY Cole Information Services INDEPENDENT MORTGAGE Cole Information Services THOMAS TEARS ATTORNEY OFFICE Cole Information Services DATAMART Cole Information Services ARCHITECTRONIX INC Cole Information Services WINTERBOTHAM PARHAM TEEPLE Cole Information Services GOKOO ROBT J LAW OFFICES Cole Information Services JEAN LIEBHARD & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services PROCUREMENT SERVICES Cole Information Services ASSOCIATES CONSOLIDATED CAPITOL CO INC Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY SOUTHERN Cole Information Services BAPTIST ASSN DAN P PLUTE INC Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 76 City Council 18 — 1510 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2004 DOUGLAS SMITH Cole Information Services ROBERT LAWINTERBOTHAM Cole Information Services KRISHNA GULAYA Cole Information Services DATABASE MARKETING Cole Information Services JF REALTY Cole Information Services LAW OFFICE JOHN MONTANO JR Cole Information Services PROCUREMENT SERVICES ASSOCS Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY SOUTHERN Cole Information Services BAPTIST ORANGE COUNTY ASSOCS INC Cole Information Services GULAYA KRISHNA ATTY AT LAW Cole Information Services JOYFUL LIGHT HEALING CTR Cole Information Services LAW OFFICE OF DOUGLAS S SMITH Cole Information Services WELLS ELECTRICAL/USA Cole Information Services THE LAW OFFICE THOMAS G TEARS Cole Information Services GRMG INC Cole Information Services US TAX ASSISTORS Cole Information Services LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT J GOKOO Cole Information Services HERON ROBERT E DC Cole Information Services WINTERBOTHAM ROBERT G LAW OFC Cole Information Services 1999 CONOR KINNEY Cole Information Services HERON ROBERT E DC Cole Information Services STERLING HOME LOANS Cole Information Services INSURANCE TRANSACTORS Cole Information Services INCORPORATED DATABASE MARKETING Cole Information Services INCORPORATED CHANNELS & GIDDENS ATTORNEYS Cole Information Services INTEGRATED DESIGN GROUP Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services RUGGLES CONSULTING ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services INCORPORATED RODRIGUEZ STEPHEN A LAW Cole Information Services OFFICES OF AKASAKA ORTIZ & CIOCATTO Cole Information Services INSURANCE ASSOCIATION PMZ PENSION CORPORATION Cole Information Services WINTERBOTHAM ROBERT G LAW Cole Information Services OFFICES OF RMV MEDICAL Cole Information Services AMERICAN LENDING CORPORATION Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 77 City Council 18 — 1511 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 EMPIRE FINANCIAL Cole Information Services 1995 CANL &GDESats Pacific Bell CHANNELS & GIDDENS attys i Pacific Bell Data Base Marketing Inc Pacific Bell DEMING JUDITH E LAW OFFICES OF Pacific Bell Elllott Peter Accountancy Corp Inc Pacific Bell Giddens F Whitfield Channels & Giddens Pacific Bell attys Government Contract Advisory & Litigation Pacific Bell Support Services Liebhard Jean MAMFT Pacific Bell Maher John G Jr Attorney At Law Pacific Bell PMZ Pension Corporation Pacific Bell Rutyna Edwards J Channels & Gdens Pacific Bell attys 1994 RUTYNA, EDWARDS J Cole Information Services JEAN LIEBHARD Cole Information Services LIEBHARD, JEAN Cole Information Services 1991 Channels Cedric H Mouser Channels & Pacific Bell Giddens attys Dataline Group Inc Pacific Bell Datalink Associates Pacific Bell DEMINGJUDITH E LAW OFFICES OF Pacific Bell Fischer William M atty Pacific Bell Flanagan Joseph P atty Pacific Bell Flanagan K Laug Pacific Bell Giddens F Whitfield Mouser Channels & Pacific Bell Giddens attys Liebhard Jean MAMFT Pacific Bell Madsen Jane E atty Pacific Bell Mouser & Channels attys Pacific Bell Mouser & Channels & Giddens attys Pacific Bell From San Diego Telephones Call Pacific Bell Mouser John E Mouser Channels & Pacific Bell Giddens attys PMZ Pension Corporation Pacific Bell Rutyna Edwards J Pacific Bell Wetterman Walter Natty Pacific Bell 1986 Advanced Paralegal Pacific Bell Akasaka Ortiz & Cocatto Insurance Assn Pacific Bell Boen Patnzia Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 78 City Council 18 — 1512 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Carleton S Mills & Associates Pacific Bell Channels Cedric H Mouser Channels I Pacific Bell Roberts attys isarik Michael J Law Offices Of Pacific Bell Colonial Financial Leasing Pacific Bell Cooper Gary anty Pacific Bell Design Business Forms Pacific Bell Fischer William M atty Pacific Bell Flanagan Joseph P atty Pacific Bell Giddens F Whitfield Mouser Channels & Pacific Bell Roberts attys Kanner Ronald H atty Pacific Bell Madsen Jane E atty Pacific Bell Mills Carl Pacific Bell Mills Carleton S Pacific Bell Mouser & Channels attys Pacific Bell Mouser & Channels & Roberts attys Pacific Bell Mouser John E Mouser Channels & Pacific Bell Roberts attys OConnor & Martin attys at law Pacific Bell PMZ Pension Corporation Pacific Bell Peters George A tty Pacific Bell Posnoff Eli J Pacific Bell Rowe Lloyd B Pacific Bell 1980 From Downey Telephones Call Pacific Telephone t Pacific Telephone I Aldrich Michael V Pacific Telephone Channels Cedric H Mouser Channels & Pacific Telephone Roberts attys Colonial Financial Corp Pacific Telephone Design Business Forms Pacific Telephone Design By R D Van De Walker Pacific Telephone I Pacific Telephone Wilson B Mac Farlane & Mac Farlane Pacific Telephone attys Keller Steven D CPA Pacific Telephone KIRBY JAME S L CPA Pacific Telephone MAC FARLAN E & MAC FARLAN E attys Pacific Telephone Mac Farlane attys Pacific Telephone Mac Farlane Robert A Mac Farlane & Mac Pacific Telephone Fariane atftys 6534209-5 Page 79 City Council 18 — 1513 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 attys Pacific Telephone Mann Natalyn A Parker& Covert attys Pacific Telephone Morrell Rivers J III Mac Farlane & Mac Pacific Telephone Farlane attys Mouser & Channels attys Pacific Telephone Mouser & Channels & Roberts attys Pacific Telephone Mouser John E Mouser Channels & Pacific Telephone Roberts attys Parker Clayton H Parker & Covert attys Pacific Telephone Parker& Covert attys Pacific Telephone Roberts Murray H Mouser Channels & Pacific Telephone Roberts attys Wetterman Walter N atty Pacific Telephone 501 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 2014 LINK ALONDRA LLC Cole Information Services M & M COURT REPORTERS INC Cole Information Services BBK PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC SERVICES Cole Information Services DONNA J BERNBROCK CPA Cole Information Services 2009 GLOBAL CONNECTOR RESEARCH Cole Information Services MOHAMMAD M HASHEMI CPA Cole Information Services RODERICK D PONATH MD Cole Information Services ELLIOTT WILLIAM A Cole Information Services M & M COURT REPORTERS INC Cole Information Services PRESTIGE REAL ESTATE Cole Information Services AMY ACCOUNTANCY CORP Cole Information Services FLECK RESEARCH Cole Information Services LINK MCFADDEN CENTER Cole Information Services DONNA J BERNBROCK CPA Cole Information Services 2004 LINK ALONDRA CTR LTD Cole Information Services WILLIAM A ELLIOTT Cole Information Services DONNA J BERNBROCK CPA Cole Information Services GLOBAL CONNECTORRESRC Cole Information Services CHRISTOPHER AMY Cole Information Services DONNA BERNBROCK Cole Information Services SKP ELECTRONICS Cole Information Services CPA DONNA BETENBROCK Cole Information Services TR PROPERTIES Cole Information Services 1999 MCE GROUP INCORPORATED Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 80 City Council 18 — 1514 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 SKP Cole Information Services AMY ROBERT C JR CPA AMY Cole Information Services ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION FLECK RESEARCH Cole Information Services 1995 AMY ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION Pacific Bell Amy Christopher L CPA Amy Accountancy Pacific Bell Corporation Amy Robt C Jr CPA Amy Accountancy Pacific Bell Corporation Fleck Research Pacific Bell Golden Circle Mental Health Assoc Pacific Bell Ibex Company Pacific Bell New Solutions Pacific Bell Ponath J J Ph D Pacific Bell Ponath Roderick DMD Pacific Bell Rehab Alliance Pacific Bell Renfroe Sharron K MFCC Pacific Bell 1994 SHARRON RENFROE Cole Information Services SANFORD ROSE ASCTS Cole Information Services J J PONATH PHD Cole Information Services ADULT CHILDREN TREATMENT CTR Cole Information Services RENFROE, SHARRON Cole Information Services 1991 AMY CHRISTOPHER L CPA R C Amy Pacific Bell Accountancy Corporation AMY ROBT C JR CPA R C Amy Pacific Bell Accountancy Corporation Barnett Jacquelyn MA Pacific Bell Crown Life Insurance Company Orange Pacific Bell County Agency Mc Fann & Associates Pacific Bell Sanford Rose Associates Santa Ana Pacific Bell Sanford S Pacific Bell R & CBliven And Associates Pacific Bell R C Baker Foundation Pacific Bell RCAMYACCOUNTANCY Pacific Bell CORPORATION Mc Fann Miles T ins Pacific Bell Sanford Security Co @Fountain Valley@ Pacific Bell 1986 Corporation Pacific Bell AMY ROBT C JR CPA R C Amy Pacific Bell Accountancy Corporation 6,934209-5 1 Page 81 City Council 18 — 1515 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Austin Mc Bnde Mortgage Pacific Bell Crown Life Orange Co Ins Associates Pacific Bell Lyons RF Co Pacific Bell Brass Din Pacific Bell Ponath Roderick D MD A Medical Corp Pacific Bell R C AMY ACCOUN TAN CY Pacific Bell CORPORATION T & T Financial Service Pacific Bell 1980 Amy Christopher L R C Amy Accountancy Pacific Telephone Corporation Amy Robt C Js CPA R C Amy Pacific Telephone Accountancy Corporation Baine Engineering Inc Pacific Telephone C E Air Prereator Pacific Telephone C E Air Preheator S 01 N Golder Circlo Or Pacific Telephone @Santa Ana@ Orange County Agency Pacific Telephone James V De Surra CLU Pacific Telephone Crown Life Orange Co Ins Associates Pacific Telephone Crown Lift Trucks S 00 S Main Pacific Telephone @Orange@ Ly ons R F Co Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone R C Amy Accoutancy Crporation Pacific Telephone Watson Donald E MD Inc Pacific Telephone 1975 Amy & Howard CPAs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Amy Robt C Jr CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Brown Gonzalez & Baine Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. C E AIR PREHEATER Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Crown Life Insurance Company Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Howard H E CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Johnson M B Development Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Johnson Mervin B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. LYONS R F CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ogilvie Larry P PhD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Randall Mel CLU Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Said John MD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Southwest Contractors Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Stipe Thomas W atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 6534209-5 Page 82 City Council 18 — 1516 10/3/2023 FINDINGS 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 2014 OG SOLUTIONS INC Cole Information Services PASSAGE HYPNOTHERAPY & NLP Cole Information Services GUTIERREZ ANA MARIA Cole Information Services 1ST NATIONAL CORP Cole Information Services FOUST MICHAEL H PHD Cole Information Services MAINPLACE FINANCIAL INC Cole Information Services SAINT LOUIS RAMS Cole Information Services VALDIVIA LINO MD Cole Information Services FIRST MORTGAGE CORP Cole Information Services TIPPING & COMPANY Cole Information Services IMPART WISDOM & WELLNESS Cole Information Services CENTERANNE NURSE STAFFING Cole Information Services NATIONWIDE HOME LOAN DIVISION Cole Information Services CONFIDENTIAL CHRISTIAN Cole Information Services STARK JEROME D ATTY Cole Information Services MATTHEWS WENDY LAW OFFICE OF Cole Information Services GUARDIAN THE Cole Information Services KANNARD DONNA PHD Cole Information Services DKN HOSPITALITY SUITES Cole Information Services MCKIBBIN BENTHALE & Cole Information Services MCKNIGHTSANTA A 2009 KANNARD DONNA PHD Cole Information Services BRAND BANDIT INC Cole Information Services ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES INC Cole Information Services FOUST MICHAEL H PHD Cole Information Services HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Cole Information Services PASSAGE HYPNOTHERAPY Cole Information Services BUREAU OF LEGAL SERVICES Cole Information Services DONALD B TIPPING II CPA Cole Information Services HIGHLANDS PROGRAM Cole Information Services EASTERN SOFTWARE OF CALIFORNIA Cole Information Services VALDIVIA LINO MD Cole Information Services GREEN EARTH INSURANCE SERVICES Cole Information Services LLC HAMPTON INN & SUITES SC Cole Information Services ARMORFLITE ROOFING Cole Information Services WISDON ENTERPRISES INC Cole Information Services 6534209- 5 1 Page 83 City Council 18 — 1517 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 DKN HOTEL LLC Cole Information Services TEATS GEORGE CPA Cole Information Services RIM & ASSOCIATES INC Cole Information Services DKN HOTELS Cole Information Services LAW OFFICE OF WERNO & Cole Information Services ASSOCIATES THOMAS F CAVALLI PHD Cole Information Services CONFIDENTIAL CHRISTIAN Cole Information Services INTRDCTNS VERONICA DEMARCO MSD Cole Information Services THE WELLNESS COMMUNITY ORANGE Cole Information Services COUNTY EXPANDING HORIZONS Cole Information Services YGLESIAS PATRICIA PHD Cole Information Services NORTHWEST ENTERPRISES LLC Cole Information Services ANAHEIM RESORT HOTEL LLC Cole Information Services DKN HOSPITALITY SUITES Cole Information Services DELORES WARDELL PHD Cole Information Services INDEPENDENT REALTY FINANCE Cole Information Services CORP 2004 ARNOLD DEUTSCH MD Cole Information Services BUREAU OF LEGAL SERVICES Cole Information Services YGLESIAS PATRICIA PHD Cole Information Services GUARDIAN CO Cole Information Services COUNTRYWIDE LENDING GROUP Cole Information Services THE WELLNESS COMMUNITY Cole Information Services DKN PARTNERSHIP Cole Information Services EXPANDING HORIZONS Cole Information Services BEACH COURT REPORTING Cole Information Services BUNES ROBERT M MD Cole Information Services DR LINO VALDIVIA Cole Information Services TEATS GEORGE CPA Cole Information Services BUREAU OF RECOVERY LLC Cole Information Services AMAZON MARKETING Cole Information Services BRISTOL TRAVEL Cole Information Services DR FOUST Cole Information Services PASSAGE HYPNOTHERAPY & NLP Cole Information Services DATABASE MARKETING GROUP INC Cole Information Services VERONICA DEMARCO Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 84 City Council 18 — 1518 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP Cole Information Services INCORPORATED HIGHLANDS PROGRAM THE Cole Information Services GRAPHICS & ADS Cole Information Services UNITED CHIROPRACTIC SPECIALISTS Cole Information Services ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services INCORPORATED RSG INCORPORATED Cole Information Services COMPRITE Cole Information Services WHEELER CONSTRUCTION Cole Information Services CLARK FERGUS & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services CONCEPTS UNLIMITED Cole Information Services PACIFIC ORCA CORPORATION Cole Information Services MACLEOD ROBERT F MD Cole Information Services KANNARD DONNA PHD Cole Information Services BUNES ROBERT M MD Cole Information Services GEFFNER GROUP THE Cole Information Services EASTERN SOFTWARE CORPORATION Cole Information Services GENERAL MEDICAL APPLICATIONS Cole Information Services BASTIAN MARY ALICE MFCC Cole Information Services JOSHUA CASEY BUSINESS Cole Information Services SOLUTIONS FERGUS CLARK & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services ATTORNEYS BORTEL BUILDERS INCORPORATED Cole Information Services PASSAGE HYPNOTHERAPY & NLP Cole Information Services TEATS GEORGE CPA Cole Information Services BRENT M THOMPSON Cole Information Services BOLANOS ALICIA S Cole Information Services WARDELL DELORES PHD Cole Information Services CFA AMERICA LIMITED Cole Information Services THOMPSON BRENT M ATTORNEY Cole Information Services ORANGE COUNTY ZODIAC PROFE Cole Information Services SSIONAL SOCCER DKN HOSPITALITY Cole Information Services MATTHEWS WENDY ATTORNEYS Cole Information Services THIRD STREET CLINIC Cole Information Services NAGY WILLIAM R & ASSOCIATES CIRS Cole Information Services COUNTRYWIDE SERVICES Cole Information Services CORPORATION INCORPORATED FILES BARBARA MFCC Cole Information Services 6534209-5 1 Page 85 City Council 18 — 1519 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 PACIFIC ORCA CORPORATION Cole Information Services SPORTS DEVELOPMENT GROUP Cole Information Services DONOVAN JOHN P ATTORNEY Cole Information Services SILER DANNY CPA Cole Information Services PRACTICAL SOLUTION Cole Information Services DEMARCO VERONICA MFCC Cole Information Services WINTER H WILLIAM PHD OFFICE Cole Information Services HUTCHINGS RENDEL B CT REPRTR Cole Information Services YGLESIAS PATRICIA PHD Cole Information Services SYRETT KATHLEEN HYPNOTHERAPIST Cole Information Services LIFE CARE RESOURCES Cole Information Services INCORPORATED LIFECARE RESOURCES Cole Information Services INCORPORATED DIVORCE EDUCATION & FAMILY Cole Information Services COUNSELING CENTER 1995 Fergus Clark & Associates attys Pacific Bell Harlin & Davenport attys Pacific Bell Harlin Michael R atty Pacific Bell Morse Gregory N Attorney At Law Pacific Bell Rogers Howard KMFCC Pacific Bell R as Design Pacific Bell Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc Pacific Bell Signature Services Pacific Bell Vista Associates Pacific Bell Websco Inc Pacific Bell Wells Lonnie B CPM Pacific Bell Blum Lawrence N Ph D Inc Pacific Bell CFA America Ltd Pacific Bell Davenport John atty Pacific Bell 1994 WELLS, LONNIE B Cole Information Services MARKS, RUSSELL H Cole Information Services TIMASSY, JOSEPH F Cole Information Services HUTCHINGS, RENDEL B Cole Information Services D&R FNCL SERVS INC Cole Information Services LAWRENCE N BLUM PHD Cole Information Services SHEILA M BEHLE Cole Information Services JOSEPH F TIMASSY Cole Information Services HARRELL R&CO CPA Cole Information Services MARJORIE RUSHFORTH Cole Information Services 6534209-5 Page 86 City Council 18 — 1520 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Behie Sheila M atty at law Pacific Bell Blum Lawrence N Ph D Inc Pacific Bell COMOGLIO PETER & CO Pacific Bell Countrywide Services Corp Inc Pacific Bell D & R Financial Services Inc Pacific Bell Davenport John atty Pacific Bell Glacier General Agency Pacific Bell Glenfed Development Corp Pacific Bell Griset Co The Pacific Bell Harlin & Davenport attys Pacific Bell Harlin Michael R atty Pacific Bell Harrell Ronald And Company CPA Pacific Bell Harrell Ronald W Pacific Bell Harrell S @Laguna Beach@ Pacific Bell Marks Russell H MD Pacific Bell Marks S Pacific Bell Marks S FVWy Pacific Bell Pilgrimage Family Therapy Center Pacific Bell Psychiatric Medical Group Pacific Bell R S G Inc Pacific Bell Rushforth Marjorie atty at law Pacific Bell Timassy Jos F Pacific Bell WEBSCO INC Pacific Bell Wells Lonnie B CPM Pacific Bell 1986 Aristocrat Personnel Service Pacific Bell Blakely Phra A Law Corp Cohen Stokke & Pacific Bell Davis attys Cohen Martin M Law Corp Cohen Stokke Pacific Bell & Days attys Cohen Stokke & Davis attys Pacific Bell Davis Wallace R Law Corp Cohen Stokke Pacific Bell & Davis attys Glenfed Property Management Pacific Bell Goldberg Gerald N Law Corp Cohen Pacific Bell Stokke & Davis Information Dimensions Inc Pacific Bell Law Robert E Judge Retired Cohen Pacific Bell Stokke B Davis Madonia Grace M Cohen Stokkke & Davis Pacific Bell attys Major Insurance Services Inc Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 87 City Council 18 — 1521 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Omega Insurance Co Pacific Bell Quotomatic Pacific Bell Samuelson Mitch Law Corp Cohen Stokke Pacific Bell & Davis attys Schwartz S Alan & Associates Pacific Bell Stokke Allan H Law Corp Cohen Stokke & Pacific Bell Davis attys Stone Edward H Cohen Stokke & Davis Pacific Bell attys Stone Edw H Cohen Stokke & Davis atty Pacific Bell 1980 Asawa Corp Pacific Telephone Blackman John D Cohen Stokke Owen & Pacific Telephone Oavis attys G Blakely Phra A Law Corp Cohen Stokke Pacific Telephone Owen & Davis attys Cohen Martin M Law Corp Cohen Stokke Pacific Telephone Owen & Davis attys Cohen Stokke Owen & Davis attys Pacific Telephone Crystal Energy Pacific Telephone DAVIS RON ALD D atty Pacific Telephone DAVIS & S AW YE R Pacific Telephone Davis attys Pacific Telephone Ericson Arthur CPA Pacific Telephone Ericsoni Arthur H Pacific Telephone Flanagan & Gesch Pacific Telephone Flanagan J Pacific Telephone Flanagan J Pacific Telephone Fox Richard P MD Pacific Telephone Fox Ruth A MD Pacific Telephone Gesch G Richard atty Pacific Telephone Gesch K Pacific Telephone Goldberg Gerald N Cohen Stokke Owen & Pacific Telephone Davis attys Ofc Pacific Telephone Holford Gary Law Corp Cohen Stokke Pacific Telephone Owen & Davis attys Immel J J Scott Cohen Stokke Owen & Pacific Telephone Davis attys Kaestner Gary CPA Pacific Telephone Santa Ana Pacific Telephone I Pacific Telephone Major Insurance Services Inc Pacific Telephone 6534209-5 1 Page 88 City Council 18 — 1522 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 ME S AROS JOHN G atty Pacific Telephone Owen Ronald E Law Corp Cohen Stokke Pacific Telephone Owen & Davis attys RIC Development Co Inc Pacific Telephone R I C Insurance General Agency Inc Pacific Telephone S Roberts Edward E atty Pacific Telephone S AS CON S TRUCTORS LTD Pacific Telephone Schwartz S Alan & Associates Pacific Telephone Shiffman R Toni Cohen Stokke Owen & Pacific Telephone Davis attys Smith Chester R atty Pacific Telephone S Wakke Alan HLaw Corp Cohen Stokke Pacific Telephone Owen& ODasi attys TE MPA ROYCE CORP Pacific Telephone Thomas Flanagan Pacific Telephone 548 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 1991 Fist Databank Mortgage Pacific Bell 550 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Year Uses Source 2014 COMMON GROUND SPIRITUAL Cole Information Services WELLNESS CEN 2009 ANDERSON WILLIAM ESQ Cole Information Services PLC & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services ALLIED HEALTH CARE ACCESS INC Cole Information Services ALLIED HEALTH CARE ACCESS Cole Information Services LINDA EBERLY INC Cole Information Services 2004 FRED FORGY JR Cole Information Services ROBERT WHEATLEY LAW OFFICE Cole Information Services 1999 BRYANT KENNETH A ATTORNEY Cole Information Services BAKER PAIGE M ATTORNEY Cole Information Services LEGAYE MARJORIE MIZE ATTORNEY Cole Information Services INADOMI MINORU ATTORNEY Cole Information Services MOSICH NICHOLAS J ATTORNEY Cole Information Services ANDERSON WILLIAM L ATTORNEY Cole Information Services FORGY FRED JR ATTORNEY Cole Information Services WHEATLEY ROBERT LAW OFFICE OF Cole Information Services PINKERTON SECURITY & Cole Information Services INVESTIGATION 6534209- 5 1 Page 89 City Council 18 — 1523 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 CURRAN LARRY L & ASSOCIATES Cole Information Services BRYANT KENNETH ATTORNEY Cole Information Services 1995 Forgy Fred Jr Pacific Bell Le Gaye Marcore Mire atty Pacific Bell Bryant Kenneth A atty Pacific Bell Barnes & Salas Inc CPA Pacific Bell Barnes Robt K CPA Barnes & Salas Inc Pacific Bell Matthews Wendy attys Pacific Bell Mosich Nicholas J atty Pacific Bell Salas Gilbert H Jr CPA Barnes & Salas Pacific Bell Inc Anderson Wm L Pacific Bell Baker & Baker APC Pacific Bell Baker E William Jr atty Pacific Bell 1994 BAKER & QUELLA Cole Information Services FORGY INADOMI & MOSICH Cole Information Services WENDY MATTHEWS Cole Information Services BAKER & BAKER Cole Information Services BARNES & SALAS INC Cole Information Services 1991 Alani Douglas D Mc Clay & Alani attys Pacific Bell Bryant Kenneth A atty Pacific Bell Forgy Fred Jr Porgy Inadnmi & Mosich Pacific Bell attys Laine Tina Louise atty Pacific Bell Le Gaye Marjorie Mize atty Pacific Bell Mosich Nicholas J atty Pacific Bell Salas Gilbert H Jr CPA Barnes & Salas Pacific Bell Inc Thomas M Eugene CPA Barnes & Salas Pacific Bell Inc 1986 Barnes Robt K CPA Huffstetler Tracy Pacific Bell Barnes & Co Baugh George L atty Pacific Bell Bryant Kenneth A atty Pacific Bell Coppa Genno Pacific Bell Forgy Fred Jr Forgy Inadomi & Mosich Pacific Bell attys Forgy Inadomi & Mosich attys Pacific Bell Hennessey Patrick atty Pacific Bell Santa Ana Pacific Bell 6534209-5 1 Page 90 City Council 18 — 1524 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Inadomi Minoru Forgy Inadomi & Mosich Pacific Bell attys Le Gaye Marjone Mize atty Pacific Bell Mosich Nicholas J atty Pacific Bell Mosich Nicholas J Forgy & Inadomi Pacific Bell Stark Jerome D atty Pacific Bell 1980 Brickner David H atty Pacific Telephone Bryant Kenneth A atty Pacific Telephone Forgy & Inadomi attys Pacific Telephone Hennessey Patrick atty Pacific Telephone Huffstetler Carl L CPA Huffstetler Tracy Pacific Telephone Barnes & Co Huffstetler Tracy Barnes & Co CPAs Pacific Telephone I Inadomi Minoru Forgy&Inadomi attys Pacific Telephone Johnson Arthur A CPA Pacific Telephone Judd Virgil D CPA Pacific Telephone Monarch Robt D atty Pacific Telephone MOS ICH N ICHOLAS J atty Pacific Telephone Moslch Nicholas J Forgy & Inadomo S S Pacific Telephone O 5 Go Iden Circ le Dr A Peauroi Henry E CPA Pacific Telephone Tracy Vernon H CPA Huffstotler Tracy Pacific Telephone Barnes & Co W 4TH ST 2012 W 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1970 Mc Neal Leonard General Telephone Co., of California 2029 W 4TH ST Year Uses Source 1995 Articulos De Piel Solorzano Pacific Bell 6534209- 5 1 Page 91 City Council 18 — 1525 10/3/2023 FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1710 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1724 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1750 E 4TH CUSTOMER 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, SERVICE 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1750 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1750 E 4TH ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1765 4TH ST E 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1770 4TH ST E 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 1770 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1782 4TH E 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1782 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1788 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1794 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1796 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1798 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1828 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 City Council 18 - 1526 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1837 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1839 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1864 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1871 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1900 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1900 E 4TH ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1902 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1906 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1909 E 4TH LONG BEACH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1909 E 4TH LONG DEACH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 21343A 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1909 E 4TH LONG LEACH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1910 E 4TH ST 2014, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1924 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1934 E 4TH LONG BEACH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1943 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1956 E 4TH AVE 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2000 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 City Council 18 - 1527 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 2000 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2000 E 4TH ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2001 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2001 E 4TH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2001 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2001 E 4TH ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2001 E 4UH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2002 N 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2004 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2006 N 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2012 W 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2016 E 4TH ST 2004, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2018 N 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2021 4TH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2021 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2021 E 4TH AVE 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2021 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 City Council 18 - 1528 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 2021 E 4TH ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2027 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2029 W 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2030 4TH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2030 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2030 E 41U 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2030 E 4T 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2030 E 4TH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2030 E 4TH AVE 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2030 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921. 1920 2030 E 4TH ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2032 N 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2038 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2038 N 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2039 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2041 4TH ST E 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2041 E 4TH 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 City Council 18 - 1529 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 2041 E 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2042 N 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2054 N 4TH ST 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2065 4TH ST E 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 210 CABRILLO PARK DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 218 CABRILLO PARK DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 249 CABRILLO PARK DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 250 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 250 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 250 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 316 CABRILLO PARK DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 327 CABRILLO PARK DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 329 CABRILLO PARK DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 501 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 501 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 501 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 540 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 City Council 18 - 1530 10/3/2023 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 548 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 550 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 550 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 550 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2001, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 City Council 18 - 1531 10/3/2023 TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1901 East 4th Street 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 City Council 18 — 1532 10/3/2023 APPENDIX D PHOTOGRAPHS City Council 18 — 1533 10/3/2023 1. View of the Site from the southwest portion facing northeast. 4. View of the commercial office building at 1901 E 4th Street. 2. View of the Site from the eastern portion facing southwest. 5. View of the outdoor lobby in the building at 1901 E 41h Street. 3. View of the Site from the western portion facing northeast. 6. View of typical pad -mounted transformer adjacent to 1901 E 4th Street. Photograph Log Cabrillo Town Center ��� Santa Ana, California City ounce — T 7. View of typical restroom. 10. View of the outdoor lobby in the building at 1917 E 4th Street. I -A 8. View of typical restroom floor drain. 9. View of the commercial office building at 1901 E 4th Street. 11. View of typical floor drain in the 1917 E 4th 12. View of the outdoor seating area at 1917 E 4th Street lobby. Street. Photograph Log Cabrillo Town Center ��� Santa Ana, California City ounce — 13. View of the commercial office building at 515 Cabrillo Drive. 16. View of the commercial office building at 525 Cabrillo Drive. 14. View of the lobby in the building at 515 Cabrillo Drive. 17. View of the lobby in the building at 525 Cabrillo Drive. 15. View of typical stairwell located in the building at 515 Cabrillo Drive. 18. View of the trash disposal area in the northeastern corner of the Site. Photograph Log Cabrillo Town Center ��� Santa Ana, California City ounce — 19. View of the trash disposal area interior. 22. View of the eastern adjoining commercial properties and parking area. 20. View of Cabrillo Drive then the western adjoining vacant lot and commercial property. 23. View of the northern adjoining recreational park. 21. View of E 4th Street then the southern adjoining commercial property. Photograph Log Cabrillo Town Center ��� Santa Ana, California City ounce — APPENDIX E INTERVIEW QUESTIONAIRRE City Council 18 — 1538 10/3/2023 Due Diligence Environmental Questionnaire - Owner Cabrillo Town Center 1901 and 1971 E 4th Street and 515 and 525 Cabrillo Park Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 and 92701 Return to dw@weisenviro.com Completed by:D t l rl A . (� i -{ a () Company or Organization: Title � (C-5 Date:_- t �= 1.) Who is the current owner of the subject property and when was it purchased? 0 0 A - C',"I -k-7 YJ T' �C' -� IV .- h 91, /C- �� I � q I 2.) Who are the past owners of the property and years of ownership (if available)? 3.) What was the past use of the subject property? C -> Yy-\ YV-\ P—'r C-I &4- �' 3 V 4.) Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens that are fled or recorded against the subject property? 0G City Council 18 — 1539 10/3/2023 5.) Are you aware of any activity and land use limitations that are in place on the property that have been fled or recorded in a registry? 6.) Are you aware of any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties that is pertinent to potential adverse environmental conditions? M 7.) Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably obtainable information that would help us to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases of hazardous wastes/materials at the property? Such information includes knowledge of specific chemicals that are present or were once present on the property, spills or other chemicals releases that may have occurred, underground or aboveground storage tanks and environmental cleanups that have been conducted on the property. ry � 8.) Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? N (i City Council 18 — 1540 10/3/2023 APPENDIX E QUALIFICATIONS City Council 18 — 1541 10/3/2023 • Dan Weis, R.E.H.S. ),Wens ENVIKUNIVIEN I AL IVIANAUEh 0I V 1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116, Carlsbad, CA 92008 ENVIRONMENTAL 1 (760) 585-7070 // E (760) 672-6338 H ® dw@weisenviro.com // ; www.weisenviro.com Professional Summary Environmental Manager and California Registered Environmental Health Specialist with extensive expertise in environmental science and assessment, environmental and public health, risk assessment, health and safety, remedial design and implementation, strategic planning and project/program design and implementation. Over 20 years of professional experience and achievement. Successful completion of projects for a wide range of clientele including, but not limited to, local government entities, developers (affordable housing and market rate), educational institutions, Federal government entities, law firms, architectural and engineering firms, lending institutions, life insurance companies, conservancies, commercial/industrial real estate owners/managers, insurance companies, wireless telecommunication carriers and real estate developers. Extensive experienced in the completion of assessment, construction and remediation quality assurance during the completion of urban redevelopment/brownfields projects and public works projects, many of which have been located in downtown areas of San Diego, Los Angeles, Oakland, San Francisco, and other urban communities throughout the State of California. Proven ability to train and mentor professional, technical and support staff. Manages a comprehensive health and safety program. Holds a Master of Science in Public Health with an emphasis in environmental health science, risk assessment, health and safety, toxicology and environmental policy. Registered Environmental Health Specialist #8172 in the State of California. Education and Professional Certification • University of Delaware, Bachelor of Arts, 1995 • San Diego State University, Master of Science, Public/Environmental Health, 2001 • State of California Registered Environmental Health Specialist #8172 • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Environmental Health Division of Emergency and Environmental Health Services - Environmental Health Training in Emergency Response • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 40 Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Standard (HAZWOPER) Training and Annual 8 Hour HAZWOPER Refresher Training • OSHA 8 Hour HAZWOPER Supervisor Training Relevant Skills and Qualifications • Proven ability to manage staff and programs/projects in challenging and diverse environments and regulatory settings. Consistently meets project schedules, goals, deadlines and budgetary restrictions. • Completed or managed over 3,000 due diligence related environmental assessments and completed or managed over 500 subsurface environmental investigations of soil gas, soil, groundwater and other media. Investigations have included human health and ecological risk assessments, evaluations of indoor air conditions based on interpretations of subsurface conditions, underground storage tank (UST) evaluation/closure and hazardous waste characterization/management. Subsurface activities performed include the completion of soil borings using various drilling technologies, soil and groundwater sampling, installation and sampling of groundwater monitoring wells, free product evaluations, exploratory trenching and real-time delineation using mobile analytical laboratories and other soil screening technology. • Managed over 100 remediation or construction management related projects primarily related to source removal of subsurface contaminants, including but not limited to, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, heavy metals, organochlorine pesticides and other agricultural related chemicals, dioxins and furans and polychlorinated biphenyls. Has also assisted in cost recovery efforts from private parties and State/Federal funding programs for environmental assessment and remediation work and has served as an expert witness during legal proceedings pertaining to environmental related claims. • Strong collaboration and negotiation skills with environmental regulatory agencies regarding project planning, initiation, status, approvals and implementation. Direct experience in interfacing with members of regulatory agencies including but not limited to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California EPA Department of Toxic Substances City Council 18 - 1542 ResumeWwq'/ ,39.E.H.S Page 1 of 2 17) Control and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, County of San Diego Departments of Environmental Health (DEH), Public Works and Planning and Land Use, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Riverside County DEH, San Francisco City and County Department of Public Health (DPH), Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, County of Los Angeles County DPH and other local Certified Unified Program Agencies. Develop, manage and implement compliance and best practices efforts with Federal and State laws and regulations. • Conducted and/or managed hundreds of public/environmental health related assessments including electromagnetic field surveys, radionuclide surveys, indoor air quality investigations, radon surveys, drinking water assessments, asbestos containing materials and lead -based paint surveys and mold/microbial evaluations. • Recovered over $10,000,000 of assessment and cleanup costs for clientele from various sources including State of California Cleanup Funds, United States Environmental Protection Agency Brownfield grants and private parties including major oil companies. • Responsible for facilitating a safe and healthy work environment in concert with the mission of the company while ensuring compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local regulations. • Published technical papers pertaining to geogenic concentrations of metals in San Diego County, radioactive dating and pollutant chronologies in estuarine sediments and various urban runoff related implications. • Delivered presentations pertaining to various environmental topics including human health risk assessment to membership at local and national trade conferences Project Experience (Projects Completed at Multiple Firms) • 14th and Island, San Diego, California — Development of Site Mitigation Plan, contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities at the superblock construction site in downtown San Diego and achievement of regulatory closure with the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health. • 2198 Market Street, San Francisco, California — Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments, supplemental subsurface investigation, Site Mitigation Plan development, contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities and negotiation/achievement of regulatory closure with the City of San Francisco Department of Public Health. • Former EZ Serve, 9305 Mission Gorge Road, Santee, California — Closure report preparation and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board interface and negotiation/achievement of regulatory closure under State of California low - threat policy. • French Field — Former Vista Burn Dump, Oceanside, California — Oversight of the capping of a former burn dump/landfill facility and restoration for public use as a sports facility. Negotiation and achievement of regulatory closure with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control with concurrence from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and the County of San Diego Local Enforcement Agency. • Indoor Skydiving Facility, 1401 Imperial Avenue, San Diego, California — Development of Soil Management Plan and contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities in downtown San Diego. • Lemon Grove Avenue Realignment Project, Lemon Grove, California — Development of Impacted Soil Management Plan, Community Health and Safety Plan and Worker Health and Safety Plan and oversight of the implementation of such plans during construction activities. • North Side Interior Road and Utilities Project at San Diego International Airport, San Diego, California - Subsurface assessment, development of Soil Management Plan and Work Health and Safety Plan and implementation and monitoring of soil management strategies. • Olympic and Hill, Los Angeles, California — Removal of multiple underground storage tanks and underlying contaminated soil and achievement of regulatory closure with the City of Los Angeles Fire Department. • San Ysidro - U.S. Land Port of Entry, San Diego, California — Subsurface assessment and development and implementation of soil management strategies. • VA Medical Center Long Beach, 5901 East 7th Street, Long Beach, California - VA Long Beach: Seismic Corrections — Mental Health, Community Living Center and Chiller Replacements Project — Asbestos containing materials and lead - based paint surveys and preparation of abatement contractor bid specifications. City Council 18 — 1543 ResumeWw9MR.E.H.S Page 2of2 b NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT Introduction This technical report evaluates noise impacts from construction and operation of the proposed Cabrillo Town Center project in the City of Santa Ana. The analysis discusses applicable regulations and compares impacts to appropriate thresholds of significance. Noise measurements, calculation worksheets, and a map of noise receptors and measurement locations are included in the Technical Appendix to this analysis. Fundamentals of Noise Characteristics of Sound Sound can be described in terms of its loudness (amplitude) and frequency (pitch). The standard unit of measurement for sound is the decibel (dB). Because the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, the A -weighted scale (dBA) is used to reflect the normal hearing sensitivity range. On this scale, the range of human hearing extends from 3 to 140 dBA. Table 1 provides examples of A -weighted noise levels from common sources. Table 1 A -Weighted Decibel Scale Typical A -Weighted Sound Levels Sound Level (dBA Leq) Near Jet Engine 130 Rock and Roll Band 110 Jet flyover at 1,000 feet 100 Power Motor 90 Food Blender 80 Living Room Music 70 Human Voice at 3 feet 60 Residential Air Conditioner at 50 feet 50 Bird Calls 40 Quiet Living Room 30 Average Whisper 20 Rustling Leaves 10 Source: Cowan, James P., Handbook of Environmental Acoustics, 1993. These noise levels are approximations intended for general reference and informational use. Noise Definitions. This noise analysis discusses sound levels in terms of equivalent noise level (Leq), maximum noise level (Lmax) and the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). • Equivalent Noise Level (L )� L represents the average noise level on an energy basis for a specific time period.'Aver%e noise level is based on the energy content (acoustic energy) of sound. For example, the Leq for one hour is the energy average noise level during that hour. Leq can be thought of as a continuous noise level of a certain period equivalent in energy content to a fluctuating noise level of that same period. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 1 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouerlC1 18 — 1544 10/3/20 2023 Maximum Noise Level (L„,,x Lmax represents the maximum instantaneous noise level measured during a given time period. • Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL): CNEL is an adjusted noise measurement scale of average sound level during a 24-hour period. Due to increased noise sensitivities during evening and night hours, human reaction to sound between 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. is as if it were actually 5 dBA higher than had it occurred between 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. From 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., humans perceive sound as if it were 10 dBA higher. To account for these sensitivities, CNEL figures are obtained by adding an additional 5 dBA to evening noise levels between 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. and 10 dBA to nighttime noise levels between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. As such, 24-hour CNEL figures are always higher than their corresponding actual 24-hour averages. Effects of Noise. The degree to which noise can impact an environment ranges from levels that interfere with speech and sleep to levels that can cause adverse health effects. Most human response to noise is subjective. Factors that influence individual responses include the intensity, frequency, and pattern of noise; the amount of background noise present; and the nature of work or human activity exposed to intruding noise. According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), extended or repeated exposure to sounds at or above 85 dB can cause hearing loss. Sounds of 70 dBA or less, even after continuous exposure, are unlikely to cause hearing loss.' The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that adults should not be exposed to sudden "impulse" noise events of 140 dB or greater. For children, this limit is 120 dB.2 Exposure to elevated nighttime noise levels can disrupt sleep, leading to increased levels of fatigue and decreased work or school performance. For the preservation of healthy sleeping environments, the WHO recommends that continuous interior noise levels not exceed 30 dBA and that individual noise events of 45 dBA or higher be avoided.3 Assuming a conservative exterior to interior sound reduction of 15 dBA, continuous exterior noise levels should therefore not exceed 45 dBA. Individual exterior events of 60 dBA or higher should also be limited. Some epidemiological studies have shown a weak association between long-term exposure to noise levels of 65 to 70 dBA and cardiovascular effects, including ischemic heart disease and hypertension. However, at this time, the relationship is largely inconclusive. People with normal hearing sensitivity can recognize small changes in sound levels of approximately 3 dBA. Changes of at least 5 dBA can be readily noticeable while sound level increases of 10 dBA or greater are perceived as a doubling in loudness.4 However, during daytime, few people are highly annoyed by noise levels below 55 dBA L .5 eq ' National Institute of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication, www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/noise-induced-hearing-loss. 2 World Health Organization, Guidelines for Community Noise, 1999. 3 Ibid. 4 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2018. 5 World Health Organization, Guidelines for Community Noise, 1999. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 2 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouer1C1 18 — 1545 10/3/20 2023 Noise Attenuation. Noise levels decrease as the distance from noise sources to receivers increases. For each doubling of distance, noise from stationary sources can decrease by about 6 dBA over hard surfaces (e.g., reflective surfaces such as parking lots) and 7.5 dBA over soft surfaces (e.g., absorptive surfaces such as soft dirt and grass). For example, if a point source produces a noise level of 89 dBA at a reference distance of 50 feet over an asphalt surface, its noise level would be approximately 83 dBA at a distance of 100 feet, 77 dBA at 200 feet, etc. Noises generated by mobile sources such as roadways decrease by about 3 dBA over hard surfaces and 4.5 dBA over soft surfaces for each doubling of distance. It should be noted that because decibels are logarithmic units, they cannot be added or subtracted. For example, two cars each producing 60 dBA of noise would not produce a combined 120 dBA. Noise is most audible when traveling by direct line of sight, an unobstructed visual path between noise source and receptor. Barriers that break line of sight between sources and receivers, such as walls and buildings, can greatly reduce source noise levels by allowing noise to reach receivers by diffraction only. As a result, sound barriers can generally reduce noise levels by up to 15 dBA.6 The effectiveness of barriers can be greatly reduced when they are not high or long enough to completely break line of sight from sources to receivers. Regulatory Framework Noise Federal. No federal noise standards regulate environmental noise associated with short-term construction activities or long-term operations of development projects. As such, temporary and long-term noise impacts produced by the Project would be largely regulated or evaluated by State and City of Santa Ana standards designed to protect public well-being and health. -State. The State's 2017 General Plan Guidelines establish county and city standards for acceptable exterior noise levels based on land use. These standards are incorporated into land use planning processes to prevent or reduce noise and land use incompatibilities. Table 2 illustrates State compatibility considerations between land uses and exterior noise levels. California Government Code Section 65302 also requires each county and city to prepare and adopt a comprehensive long-range general plan for its physical development. Section 65302(f) requires a noise element to be included in the general plan. This noise element must identify and appraise noise problems in the community, recognize Office of Noise Control guidelines, and analyze and quantify current and projected noise levels. The State has also established noise insulation standards for new multi -family residential units, hotels, and motels that are subject to relatively high levels of noise from transportation. The noise insulation standards, collectively referred to as the California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24, California Code of Regulations) set forth an interior standard of 45 dBA CNEL for habitable rooms. The standards require an acoustical analysis which indicates that dwelling units meet this interior 6 California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 3 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouer1C1 18 — 1546 10/3/20 2023 standard where such units are proposed in areas subject to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA CNEL. Local jurisdictions typically enforce the California Noise Insulation Standards through the building permit application process. City of Santa Ana General Plan Noise Element. The City's 2022 General Plan includes a Noise Element that includes policies and standards to guide the control of noise to protect residents, workers, and visitors. Its primary goal is to regulate long-term noise impacts to preserve acceptable noise environments for all types of land uses. It includes programs applicable to construction projects that call for protection of noise sensitive uses and use of best practices to minimize short-term noise impacts. It defines sensitive uses as residences, schools, health care centers, libraries, churches, senior homes, and recreational areas. However, the Noise Element contains no quantitative or other thresholds of significance for evaluating a project's noise impacts. Instead, it adopts the State's guidance on noise and land use compatibility, shown in Table 2, to help guide determination of appropriate land use and mitigation measures vis-a-vis existing or anticipated ambient noise levels. It also includes four goals and nine associated policies relevant for the Proposed Project: Goal N-1 (Land Use Compatibility): Ensure that existing and future land uses are compatible with current and projected local and regional noise conditions. Policy N-1.1 (Noise Standards): Utilize established Citywide Noise Standards and guidelines to inform land use decisions and guide noise management strategies. Policy N-1.2 (Sound Design): Encourage functional and attractive designs to mitigate excessive noise levels. Policy N-1.4 (Sensitive Uses): Protect noise sensitive land uses from excessive, unsafe, or otherwise disruptive noise levels. Goal N-2 (Noise Generators): Reduce the impact of known sources of noise and vibration. Policy N-2.1 (Transportation Related Noise): Reduce noise generated from traffic, railroads, transit, and airports to the extent feasible. Policy N-2.2 (Stationary Related Noise): Minimize noise impacts from commercial and industrial facilities adjacent to residential uses or zones where residential uses are permitted. Policy N-2.3 (Temporary and/or Nuisance Noise): Minimize the effects of intermittent, short-term, or other nuisance noise sources. Goal N-3 (Airport and Land Use Environs): Protect sensitive land uses from airport related noise impacts. Policy N-3.1 (Residential Development): Residential development within the John Wayne Airport (JWA) 65 dB(A) CNEL Noise Contour or greater is not supported. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 4 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn Ouer1C1 18 — 1547 10/3/20 2023 Table 2 State of California Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix Land Use Category Residential - Low Density Single -Family, Duplex, Mobile Homes Community Noise Exposure (dB, Ld, or CNEL) 55 60 65 70 75 80 Residential - Multi -Family Transient Lodging - Motels Hotels Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters Sports Arena, Outdoor Spectator Sports Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries Office Buildings, Business Commercial and Professional Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture Normally Acceptable - Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction without any special noise insulation requirements. Conditionally Acceptable - New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply system or air conditioning will normally suffice. Normally Unacceptable - New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. ■ Clearly Unacceptable - New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Source: California Office of Planning and Research "General Plan Guidelines, Noise Element Guidelines (Appendix D, Figure 2), 2017. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 5 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn OUer1C1 18 — 1548 10/3/20 2023 Policy N-3.2 (Flight Paths): Advocate that future flight path selection be directed away from existing noise sensitive land uses. Policy N-3.3 (Residential Mitigation): Require all residential land uses in 60 dB(A) CNEL or 65 dB(A) CNEL Noise Contours to be sufficiently mitigated so as not to exceed an interior standard of 45 dB(A) CNEL. The City also has adopted guidelines for noise levels by land use (Table 3) that help guide land use decisions. Table 3 City of Santa Ana Interior and Exterior Noise Standards Categories Land Use Categories Interiora Exterior Residential Single-family, duplex, multi -family 45 dB CNEL 65 dB CNEL Hospital, school 45 dB CNEL 65 dB CNEL Institutional classroom/playground Religious facility, library 45 dB CNEL -- Open Space Parks -- 65 dB CNEL a. Interior areas, to include but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchens, living rooms, dining rooms, private offices, and conference rooms. b. Exterior areas shall mean: private yards of single family homes, park picnic areas, school playgrounds, common areas. Private open space, such as atriums on balconies, shall be excluded from exterior noise requirements provided sufficient common area is included within the project. c. Interior noise level requirements assume a closed -window condition. Mechanical ventilation system or other means of natural ventilation shall be provided per Chapter 12 of the Uniform Building Code, as necessary. Source: City of Santa Ana General Plan Noise Element, 2022. City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. The Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) contains regulations that regulate noise. Article VI governs exterior and interior noise levels and addresses nuisance issues. It includes exterior noise standards, as summarized in Table 4. Table 4 City of Santa Ana Interior and Exterior Noise Standards Noise Zone Noise Level Time Period Citywide 55 dB(A) 7:00 A.M.-10:00 P.M. 50 dB(A) 10:00 P.M.-7:00 A.M. Source: City of Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 18-312. Section 18-312(b) also establishes that any noise increases at residential properties are limited to: • The noise standard for a cumulative period of more than thirty (30) minutes in any hour; or Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 6 City of Santa Ana Noise l ynl.OUer1C1 18 — 1549 10/3/20 2023 • The noise standard plus five (5) dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than fifteen (15) minutes in any hour; or • The noise standard plus ten (10) dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than five (5) minutes in any hour; or • The noise standard plus fifteen (15) dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than one minute in any hour; or • The noise standard plus twenty (20) dB(A) for any period of time. SAMC Section 18-314(e) notes that noise from construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any property is exempt from exterior noise standards between 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M., Monday through Saturday. Such activities on Sundays or national holidays are subject to those standards. Existing Conditions Noise Sensitive Receptors The Project Site is located on the Fourth Street corridor, which is populated with a mix of residential, retail, and commercial uses near the Project Site. Noise -sensitive receptors within 0.25 miles of the Project Site include, but are not limited to, the following representative sampling: • Cabrillo Park, 1820 East Fruit Street; directly north of the Project Site. • Urgent Care Facility, 2001 East Fourth Street; 60 feet east of the Project Site. • Residences, 724 North Parkcenter Drive; 80 feet northeast of the Project Site. • Health Care Facility, 1900 East Fourth Street; 120 feet south of the Project Site. • Residences, 618 Sherry Lane; 400 feet west of the Project Site. • Residences, 1901 East First Street; 450 feet south of the Project Site. Existing Ambient Noise Levels The Project Site is improved with four commercial buildings totaling 173,025 square feet and 617 surface parking spaces. There is minor operational noise from these facilities, including a number of roof -top units providing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) for the buildings that occasionally generate minor levels of noise (approximately 81.9 dBA at one foot of distance).7 There is also intermittent noise from the operation of the parking lot, including tire friction as vehicles navigate to and from parking spaces, minor engine acceleration, doors slamming, and occasional car alarms. Most of these sources are instantaneous (e.g., car alarm chirp, door slam) while others may last a few seconds. There is also infrequent noise from occasional solid waste management and collection activities that are of short duration, as is occasional loading of goods. 7 City of Pomona, Pomona Ranch Plaza WalMart Expansion Project, Table 4.4-5; August 2014. Source was cluster of mechanical rooftop condensers including two Krack MXE-04 four -fan units and one MXE- 02 two -fan unit. Reference noise level based on 30 minutes per hour of activity. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 7 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn Ouer1C1 18 — 1550 10/3/20 2023 Traffic is the primary source of noise near the Project Site, largely from the operation of vehicles with internal combustion engines and frictional contact with the ground and air.8 This includes traffic on Fourth Street, which carries about 23,828 daily vehicles between Tustin Avenue and Cabrillo Park Drive.9 Existing development contributes 1,876 daily vehicle trips onto local roads.10 On June 27, 2023, DKA Planning took short-term noise measurements near the Project site to determine ambient noise conditions near sensitive receptors.11 As shown in Table 5, noise levels along roadways near the Project Site ranged from 56.7 dBA Leq,on Sherry Lane to 68.3 dBA Leq,on Fourth Street. These measurements are generally consistent with the traffic volumes on the applicable streets. Figure 1 illustrates where ambient noise levels were measured near the Project Site to establish the noise environment and their relationship to the applicable sensitive receptor(s). 24-hour CNEL noise levels are generally considered "Normally Acceptable" and "Conditionally Acceptable" for the types of land uses near the Project Site. Table 5 Existing Noise Levels Distance Sound Levels Noise Measurement from Primary Nearest Sensitive Noise/Land dBA Locations Project Site Noise Source dBA (CNEL) Receptor(s) Use Compatibilityb (Leg) Traffic on Cabrillo Park; Normally A. Cabrillo Park Dr. Five feet Cabrillo Park 59.5 57.5 Residence — 724 Acceptable Dr. N. Parkcenter Dr.° B. 2001 E. 4th St. Five feet Traffic on 41h 65.8 63.8 Urgent Care — Conditionally St. 2001 E. Fourth St. Acceptable C. SE corner 41h St/ Traffic on 41h Health Care Conditionally Cabrillo Park Dr. 120 feet St 68.3 66.3 Facility — 1900 E. Acceptable Fourth St. D. 618 Sherry Ln. 370 feet Traffic on 56.7 54.7 Residence — 618 Normally Sherry Ln. Sherry Ln. Acceptable a Estimated based on short-term (15-minute) noise measurement using Federal Transit Administration procedures from 2018 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Appendix E, Option 4. b Pursuant to California Office of Planning and Research "General Plan Guidelines, Noise Element Guidelines, 2017. When noise measurements apply to two or more land use categories, the more noise -sensitive land use category is used. See Table 2 above for definition of compatibility designations. 8 World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/docstore/peh/noise/Comnoise-2.pdf. 9 City of Santa. Ana GIS Open Data portal, accessed July 26, 2023. 2015 traffic counts adjusted by a one percent adjustment to reflect ambient traffic growth. https://gis-santa- ana.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/927fOb948fcf4OOeafl cl 3d35239a7b1 /explore?location=33.74925 6%2C-117.838786%2C 17.62 to Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. 11 Noise measurements were taken after 2:42 P.M. using a Quest Technologies Sound Examiner SE-400 Meter. The meter complies with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and International Electrotechnical Commission for environmental measurement instrumentation and was equipped with a calibrated omni-directional microphone, and set five feet above the ground. In the absence of a protocol for establishing ambient noise levels for construction analyses, 15-minute measurements were taken during hours when construction is likely to occur. As the major source of ambient noise in the area (traffic) was stable, 15-minute samples were deemed representative of ambient noise levels. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 8 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouer1C1 18 — 1551 10/3/20 2023 c Measurements were deemed applicable to the residence at 724 N. Parkcenter Drive given its similar immediate proximity to Cabrillo Park. Source: DKA Planning, 2023 Project Impacts Methodology On -Site Construction Activities. Construction noise levels at off -site sensitive receptors were modeled employing the ISO 9613-2 sound attenuation methodologies using the SoundPLAN Essential model (version 5.1). This software package considers reference equipment noise levels, noise management techniques, distance to receptors, and any attenuating features to predict noise levels from sources like construction equipment. Construction noise sources were modeled as area sources to reflect the mobile nature of construction equipment. These vehicles would not operate directly where the Project's property line abuts adjacent structures, as they would retain Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 9 City of Santa Ana Noise i yn ouer1C1 18 — 1552 10/3/20 2023 some setback to preserve maneuverability. This equipment would also occasionally operate at reduced power and intensity to maintain precision at these locations. Off -Site Construction Noise Activities. The Project's off -site construction noise impact from haul trucks, vendor deliveries, worker commutes, and other vehicles accessing the Project Site was analyzed by considering the Project's anticipated vehicle trip generation with existing traffic and roadway noise levels along local roadways, particularly those likely to be part of any haul route. Because it takes a doubling of traffic volumes on a roadway to generate the increased sound energy it takes to elevate ambient noise levels by 3 dBA,12 the analysis focused on whether truck and auto traffic would double traffic volumes on key roadways to be used for hauling soils to and/or from the Project Site during construction activities. Because haul trucks generate more noise than traditional passenger vehicles, a 19.1 passenger car equivalency (PCE) was used to convert haul truck trips to a reference level conversion to an equivalent number of passenger vehicles.13 For vendor deliveries, a 9.55 PCE was used to reflect a blend of medium- and heavy- duty vehicles. It should be noted that because an approved haul route may not be approved as of the preparation of this analysis, assumptions were made about logical routes that would minimize haul truck traffic on local streets in favor of major arterials that can access regional - serving freeways. On -Site Operational Noise Activities. The Project's potential to result in significant noise impacts from on -site operational noise sources was evaluated by identifying sources of on -site noise sources and considering the impact that they could produce given the nature of the source (i.e., loudness and whether noise would be produced during daytime or more -sensitive nighttime hours), distances to nearby sensitive receptors, ambient noise levels near the Project Site, the presence of similar noise sources in the vicinity, and maximum noise levels permitted by the SAMC. Off -Site Operational Noise Activities. The Project's off -site noise impact from Project -related traffic was evaluated based its potential to increase traffic volumes on local roadways that serve the Project site. Because it takes a doubling of traffic volumes on a roadway to generate the increased sound energy it takes to elevate ambient noise levels by 3 dBA, the analysis focused on whether auto trips generated by the Proposed Project would double traffic volumes on key roadways that access the Project Site. Thresholds of Significance Construction Noise Thresholds. For the purposes of this anlaysis, the on -site construction noise impact would be considered significant if: • Construction activities would exceed existing ambient exterior noise levels by 5 dBA (hourly Leq) or more at a noise -sensitive use. 12 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018. 13 Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement Table 3-3, 2013. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 10 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouerlC1 18 — 1553 10/3/20 2023 Operational Noise Thresholds. In addition to applicable City standards and guidelines that would regulate or otherwise moderate the Project's operational noise impacts, the following criteria are adopted to assess the impact of the Project's operational noise sources: • Project operations would elevate noise levels by 5 dBA CNEL or greater if the noise increase would meet or exceed 65 dBA CNEL noise level standard at sensitive land uses including residential uses; or • Project operations would elevate noise levels by 5 dBA CNEL or greater. These thresholds of significance are consistent with those in the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone EIR.14 Analysis of Project Impacts a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction On -Site Construction Activities Construction would generate noise during the construction process that would span 36 months of demolition, site preparation, grading, utilities trenching, building construction, paving, and application of architectural coatings, as shown in Table 6. During all construction phases, noise - generating activities could occur at the Project Site between 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday. As such, construction activities would comply with SAMC Section 18-314(e), which sets permissible hours of activity. 14 City of Santa Ana Metro East mixed Use Overlay Zone EIR, Volume I. Section 4.9.3, page 4.9-14. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 11 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouer1C1 18 — 1554 10/3/20 2023 Table 6 Construction Schedule Assumptions Phase Duration Notes Removal of 6,000 tons of demolition debris in 10-cubic yard Demolition Months 1-2 capacity trucks, hauled up to 20 miles to the Olinda Alpha Landfill. Site Preparation Month 3 (one Grubbing and removal of trees, plants, landscaping, weeds week) over a 64,000 square -foot area Grading Months 3-5 Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil hauled 20 miles to Olinda Alpha Landfill in 14-cubic yard capacity trucks. Trenching Months 6-8 Trenching for utilities, including gas, water, electricity, and telecommunications. Paving Months 9-11 Flatwork, including paving of driveways and walkways Footings and foundation work (e.g., pouring concrete pads), Building Construction Months 12- framing, welding; installing mechanical, electrical, and 36 plumbing. Floor assembly, cabinetry and carpentry, elevator installations, low voltage systems, trash management. Architectural Coatings Months 33- Application of interior and exterior coatings and sealants. 36 Source: DKA Planning, 2023. Noise levels would generally peak during the demolition and grading phases, when diesel -fueled heavy-duty equipment like excavators and dozers are used to move large amounts of debris and dirt, respectively. This equipment is mobile in nature and does not always operate at in a steady- state mode full load, but rather powers up and down depending on the duty cycle needed to conduct work. As such, equipment is occasionally idle during which time no noise is generated. During other phases of construction (e.g., trenching, building construction, paving, architectural coatings), noise impacts are generally lesser because they are less reliant on using heavy equipment with internal combustion engines. Smaller equipment such as forklifts, generators, and various powered hand tools and pneumatic equipment would often be utilized. Off -site secondary noises would be generated by construction worker vehicles, vendor deliveries, and haul trucks. Figure 2 illustrates noise levels from the construction site during the demolition and grading phases. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 12 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouer1C1 18 — 1555 10/3/20 2023 Figure 2 Construction Noise Impacts at Key Sensitive Receptors The applicable City threshold of significance for the Project's construction noise impacts is an increase of 5 dBA over existing ambient noise levels. As shown in Table 7, when considering ambient noise levels, the use of multiple pieces of powered equipment simultaneously would increase ambient noise negligibly.15 These construction noise levels would not exceed the City's significance threshold of 5 dBA. Therefore, the Project's on -site construction noise impact would be less than significant. 15 This assumes the mix of construction equipment assumed in the air quality analysis (see CalEEMod 2022.1.1.14 model runs in Air Quality Technical Appendix). The best practices measures required by mitigation measures MM-OZ 4.9-1 through MM-OZ 4.9-4 of the Metro Overlay Zone EIR were assumed. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 13 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouer1C1 18 — 1556 10/3/20 2023 Table 7 Construction Noise Impacts at Off -Site Sensitive Receptors Distance Maximum Existing New Receptor from Project Construction Ambient Ambient Increase Potentially Site Noise Level Noise Level Noise Level (dBA Leq) Significant? (dBA Leq) (dBA Leq) (dBA Leq) 1. Cabrillo Park Five feet 60.2 59.5 62.9 3.4 No 2. Residence - 724 80 feet 59.6 59.5 62.6 3.1 No N. Parkcenter Dr. 3. Urgent Care - 60 feet 62.6 65.8 67.5 1.7 No 2001 E. 4tn St. 4. Health Care Facility - 1900 E. 120 feet 61.8 68.3 69.2 0.9 No 4tn St. 5. Residence - 618 400 feet 50.8 56.7 57.7 1.0 No Sherry Ln. Source: DKA Planning, 2023. Off -Site Construction Activities The Project would also generate noise at off -site locations from haul trucks moving debris and soil from the Project Site during demolition and grading activities, respectively; vendor trips; and worker commute trips. These activities would generate up to an estimated 838 peak hourly PCE vehicle trips, as summarized in Table 8, during the building construction phase.16 This would represent about 35.2 percent of traffic volumes on Fourth Street, which carries about 2,382 vehicles at Cabrillo Park Drive in the morning peak hour of traffic.17 Because workers and vendors will likely use more than one route to travel to and from the Project Site, this conservative assessment of traffic volumes overstates the likely traffic volumes from construction activities at this intersection. Fourth Street would serve as part of the haul route for any soil exported from the Project Site given its direct access to the Santa Ana Freeway. Because the Project's construction -related trips would not cause a doubling in traffic volumes (i.e., 100 percent increase) on Fourth Street, the Project's construction -related traffic would not increase existing noise levels by 3 dBA or more, which is less than the 5 dBA threshold of significance for off -site construction noise activities. Therefore, the Project's noise impacts from construction -related traffic would be less than significant. 16 This is a conservative, worst -case scenario, as it assumes all workers travel to the worksite at the same time and that vendor and haul trips are made in the same early hour, using the same route as haul trucks to travel to and from the Project Site. 17 City of Santa. Ana GIS Open Data portal, accessed July 26, 2023. 2015 traffic counts adjusted by a one percent adjustment to reflect ambient traffic growth. https://gis-santa- ana.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/927fOb948fcf400eaf1 c13d35239a7b1 /explore?location=33.74925 6%2C-117.838786%2C17.62. Assumes ten percent of daily travel is in the A.M. peak hour. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 14 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouerlC1 18 - 1557 10/3/20 2023 Table 8 Construction Vehicle Trips (Maximum Hourly) Percent of Peak Construction Phase Worker Trips a P Vendor Trips p Haul Trips Total Trips A.M. Hour Trips on 4th St.f Demolition 15 0 149b 164 6.9 Site Preparation 18 0 129° 147 6.2 Grading 20 0 3d 23 0.9 Trenching 3 0 0 3 0.1 Building Construction 521 317e 0 838 35.2 Paving 15 0 0 15 0.6 Architectural Coating 104 0 0 104 4.4 a Assumes all worker trips occur in the peak hour of construction activity. b The project would generate 2,400 haul trips over a 44-day period with seven -hour work days. Because haul trucks emit more noise than passenger vehicles, a 19.1 passenger car equivalency (PCE) was used to convert haul truck trips to a passenger car equivalent. ° This would include 237 haul trips over a five-day period. Assumes a 19.1 PCE. d The project would generate 57 haul trips over a 61-day period with seven -hour work days. Assumes a 19.1 PCE. e This phase would generate about 116 vendor truck trips daily over a seven -hour work day. Assumes a blend of vehicle types and a 9.55 PCE. f Percent of existing traffic volumes on 4th Street at Cabrillo Park Drive. Source: DKA Planning, 2023 Operation On -Site Operational Noise During long-term operations, the Project would produce noise from on -site sources such as mechanical equipment associated with the structures themselves or from activity in outdoor spaces. The Project would operate mechanical equipment to control climate for the residences and commercial spaces that would generate noise that would contribute to ambient noise levels. For the retail, shopkeeper, and office spaces and apartments, HVAC equipment in the form of rooftop units suitable for heating and cooling large volumes of a building would be located on rooftops of the five -story development, approximately 58'2" above grade. This could include heat pumps for each commercial space that generate noise during both heating and cooling sessions while air conditioners operate during cooling cycles. Noise from heat and air conditioners is a function of the model, airflow, and pressure flow generated by fans and compressors. Noise would come from sound sources such as compressors, condenser fans, supply fans, return fans, and exhaust Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 15 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouerlC1 18 — 1558 10/3/20 2023 fans that could generate a sound pressure level of up to 81.9 dBA at one foot.18 In addition, the rooftop could support HVAC equipment for multi -family residences, with each unit distributed across the roof as needed to serve each residence. While each unit would have a sound power of about 76 dBA, the location on the roof would help shield the noise path to nearby sensitive receptors. As blocking the line of sight to a noise source generally results in a 5 decibel reduction, each rooftop unit would generate about 50.3 dBA at ten feet of distance.19 Noise impacts from rooftop mechanical equipment on nearby sensitive receptors would be negligible for several reasons. First, most modern heat pumps are relatively quiet, with sound ratings of up to 60 decibels, equivalent to normal human conversation.20 Second, there would be no line -of -sight from these rooftop units to the sensitive receptors. Because the residences, medical facilities, and urgent facility near the Project Site are one- to three -stories in height, there would be no sound path from the HVAC equipment to receptors that would be 20 to 45 feet lower than the roof of the Proposed Project. Third, the presence of the Project's roof edge creates an effective noise barrier that further reduces noise levels from rooftop HVAC units by 8 dBA or more.21 A parapet would further shield sensitive receptors near the Project Site. These design elements would be helpful in managing noise, as equipment often operates continuously throughout the day and occasionally during the day, evenings, and weekends. As a result, noise from HVAC units would negligibly elevate ambient noise levels, far less than the 5 dBA CNEL threshold of significance for operational impacts. For the townhomes, outdoor mechanical equipment for heating and cooling for each residence would likely be located on the ground level of each unit.22 This could include a ground -mounted heat pump that would generate noise during both heating and cooling sessions while air conditioners operate during cooling cycles.23 This equipment would include a number of sound sources, including compressors, condenser fans, supply fans, return fans, and exhaust fans. These units could be rated to generate a sound power between 51 and 76 dBA. Any off -site sensitive receptors would not experience elevated noise levels without a direct line -of -sight to these units. Given their location near each residence, any sound path from these units would likely be attenuated by the presence of the townhomes and structures in the Project, as well as the distance to off -site receptors (i.e., Cabrillo Park to the north, Lake Dianne Apartments to the northeast). As a result, noise from HVAC units would negligibly elevate ambient noise levels, far 18 City of Pomona, Pomona Ranch Plaza WalMart Expansion Project, Table 4.4-5; August 2014. Source was cluster of mechanical rooftop condensers including two Krack MXE-04 four -fan units and one MXE- 02 two -fan unit. Reference noise level based on 30 minutes per hour of activity. 19 Washington State Department of Transportation, Noise Walls and Barriers. https://wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/protecting-environment/noise-walls-barriers. Assumes the Carrier's rated sound power of 76 dB. 20 Clean British Columbia. Heat Pumps and Noise. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/heat-pump-noise- guide.pdf 21 Ibid. 22 HVAC equipment located on the roof of townhomes 37'1" above grade would reduce noise exposure for sensitive receptors, as the line of sight would be blocked by the roof parapets and/or roof edge. 23 Given the Project Site's location in Climate Zone 9, Title 24 would also allow a more conventional gas heating system that uses an internal furnace paired with an external air conditioner that would be ground -mounted. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 16 City of Santa Ana Noise l ynl.ouer1C1 18 — 1559 10/3/20 2023 less than the 5 dBA CNEL threshold of significance for operational impacts. Table 9 summarizes the incremental contribution of mechanical equipment to the Project's operational noise levels. Pad -mounted oil transformers that lower high voltage to standard household voltage used to power electronics, appliances and lighting would be located on the ground level in an unobstructed location. These transformers are housed in a steel cabinet and generally do not involve pumps, though fans may be needed on some units. Switchgear responsible for distributing power through the development could be located externally, though no mechanical processes that generate noise would be necessary. Otherwise, all other mechanical equipment would be fully enclosed within the structure. This can include mechanical, electrical, and plumbing rooms, a utility fan room, as well as elevator equipment (including hydraulic pump, switches, and controllers) in the subterranean basement. Pumps and other equipment for the pools and spas for the apartment complex and townhome areas would be housed in enclosed equipment that would substantially reduce exposure of off - site receptors to operational noise. Further, the pool and spas for the apartment complex would be located in interior courtyards that would be fully surrounded by the multi -story development, ensuring that any noise is substantially shielded from off -site sensitive receptors. Finally, the ground -level pool and spas for the townhome complex would be located in an interior courtyard and would be fully surrounded by the three-story townhomes, ensuring that any noise is substantially shielded from off -site sensitive receptors. All these activities would generally occur within the envelope of the development, operational noise would be shielded from off -site noise -sensitive receptors. Auto -Related Activities The majority of vehicle -related noise impacts at the Project Site would come from vehicles entering and exiting the mixed -use development from Fourth Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. Vehicles would access the 58 townhomes at the northern portion of the Project Site from Cabrillo Park Drive via an extension of Parkcourt Place onto the Project Site, and would then use an internal driveway to access the garages.24 The parking structure at the southern portion of the Project Site serving the retail, office and the 449 apartments would be accessed via two driveways from Cabrillo Park Drive and Fourth Street. As shown in Table 9, auto -related activities along Fourth Street, Cabrillo Park Drive, Parkcourt Place, and the internal townhome driveway would contribute marginally to noise from the Project Site and would elevate ambient noise levels by less than 0.1 dBA CNEL, well below the 5 dBA threshold of significance for operational sources of noise. Parking noise would include tire friction as vehicles navigate to and from parking spaces, doors slamming, car alarms, and minor engine acceleration. Most of these sources are instantaneous 24 Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 17 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouerlC1 18 — 1560 10/3/20 2023 (e.g., car alarm chirp, door slam) while others may last a few seconds. As these activities would be in private garages for the townhomes and in an enclosed parking garage structure for the apartments, retail, and commercial uses, parking noise would be reduced from current activities that occur in the open-air, surface parking lot. As such, the Project's parking garage activities would not have a significant impact on the surrounding noise environment. While most operations would be conducted inside the development, outdoor activities could generate noise that could impact local sensitive receptors. This would include human conversation, recreational activities, trash collection, landscape maintenance, and commercial loading. These are discussed below: • Human conversation. While noise associated with everyday residential activities would largely occur internally within the development, there could include passive activities such as human conversation, socializing, and passive recreation in outdoor spaces, which could include: o Central courtyards (Apartment Complex). Two internal courtyards (Courtyards `A" and `B') with spas and a swimming pool would be located within the apartment development. These would be a shared use space for socializing or passive recreation (e.g., reading, walking), with intermittent use largely during day or evening hours. No powered speakers are proposed that would amplify either speech or music. Both courtyards would be completely surrounded by the multi -story residences and parking garage that would shield off -site sensitive receptors from any line -of -sight to these outdoor areas. o External courtyards (Apartment Complex). Two courtyards branded as "The Backyards" (Courtyards `C' and `D') along the eastern portion of the apartment complex would be located near Fourth Street. These would be shared use spaces for socializing or passive recreation (e.g., reading, dining), with intermittent use largely during day or evening hours. No powered speakers are proposed that would amplify either speech or music. o Central courtyard (Townhome Complex). An internal courtyard with a spa and a swimming pool would be located within the apartment development. This would be a shared use space for socializing or passive recreation (e.g., reading, dining), with intermittent use largely during day or evening hours. No powered speakers are proposed that would amplify either speech or music. The courtyard would be flanked by the three-story residences and the apartment development to the south that would shield off -site sensitive receptors from any line -of -sight to these outdoor areas. o Private balconies and ground -level patios on all elevations (Apartment Complex and Townhome Complex). These would be private spaces for residents used for socializing or passive recreation (e.g., reading), with intermittent use largely during day or evening hours. No powered speakers are proposed that would amplify either speech or music. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 18 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn OUer1C1 18 — 1561 10/3/20 2023 o Roof terrace (Apartment Complex). This would be a shared use space on top of the central parking garage for socializing or passive recreation (e.g., reading, dining), with intermittent use largely during day or evening hours. No powered speakers are proposed that would amplify either speech or music. There would be no direct line -of - sight to adjacent sensitive receptors, which would be 20 to 45 feet lower in height than the roof deck. Blocking the line of sight to a noise source generally results in a 5 decibel reduction.25 The presence of the roof edge, parapet, and the 175-foot setback of decks from the front edge of the parking garage would shield any rooftop noise from the sensitive receptors near the Project Site. o Town Center Plaza. An open air plaza at the southwestern corner of the Project Site, away from sensitive uses, would provide a shared use space for socializing or passive recreation (e.g., reading, dining), with intermittent use largely during day or evening hours. No powered speakers are proposed that would amplify either speech or music. The primary use of these spaces would be for human conversation, which would produce negligible noise impacts, based on the Lombard effect. This phenomenon recognizes that voice noise levels in face-to-face conversations generally increase proportionally to background ambient noise levels. Specifically, vocal intensity increases about 0.38 dB for every 1.0 dB increase in noise levels above 55 dB.26 For example, the sound of a human voice at 60 dB would produce a noise level of 39 dB at ten feet, which would not elevate ambient noise levels at any of the analyzed sensitive receptors by more than 0.2 dBA Leq. Moreover, noise levels from human speech would attenuate rapidly with greater distance, resulting in a 33 dB noise level at twenty feet, and 27 dB at 40 feet. Further, the infrequent nature of outdoor use of these spaces and any acoustic noise (e.g., speech) makes it impossible to individually or collectively elevate 24-hour noise levels by 5 dBA CNEL or more at any nearby noise - sensitive receptors. Table 9 summarizes the incremental contribution of these outdoor spaces to the Project's operational noise levels. • Recreational Activities. The Project would include a swimming pool in the central courtyard for the townhouses and in Courtyard 'A' for the apartment complex. These are outdoor facilities expected to be used primarily during Spring and Summer months during the day and evening hours. Both facilities are surrounded by the multi -story development and would be shielded from any line -of -sight to off -site sensitive receptors. Table 9 summarizes the incremental contribution of these outdoor spaces to the Project's operational noise levels. • Dog Park. An outdoor facility for dogs would be located along the eastern property line facing the parking lot of the adjacent commercial property. Table 9 summarizes the incremental contribution of the dog park to the Project's operational noise levels. • Trash collection. On -site trash and recyclable materials for the townhouse residents would be managed refuse trucks that use the internal driveway to collect waste from the rear of each 25 Washington State Department of Transportation, Noise Walls and Barriers. https://wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/protecting-environment/noise-walls-barriers. 26 Acoustical Society of America, Volume 134; Evidence that the Lombard effect is frequency -specific in humans, Stowe and Golob, July 2013. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 19 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouerlC1 18 — 1562 10/3/20 2023 townhouse. On -site was collection from the apartment and commercial complex would be done on the ground level of the parking garage and moved to the Trash Staging area at the southeast corner of the development. Dumpsters would be moved to the street manually or with container handler trucks that use hydraulic -powered lifts that use beeping alerts during operation. Haul trucks would access solid waste from either the Paseo (internal circulation road along the eastern portion of the Project Site), or along Fourth Street or Cabrillo Park Drive, where solid waste activities would include use of trash compactors and hydraulics associated with the refuse trucks themselves. Noise levels of approximately 71 dBA Leq and 66 dBA Leq could be generated by collection trucks and trash compactors, respectively, at 50 feet of distance.27 As these activities would be comparable to trash collection for the existing office park, net impacts would be negligible and be considered less than significant. • Landscape maintenance. Noise from gas -powered leaf blowers, lawnmowers, and other landscape equipment can generated substantial bursts of noise during regular maintenance. For example, two gas powered leaf blowers with two-stroke engines and a hose vacuum can generate an average of 85.5 dBA Leq and cause nuisance or potential noise impacts for nearby receptors.28 The landscape plan focuses on a modest palette of accent trees and raised planters on the ground level and roof terrace that will minimize the need for powered landscaping equipment, as some of this can be managed by hand. As these activities would be comparable to landscape maintenance for the existing office park, net impacts would be negligible and be considered less than significant. • Commercial loading. On -site loading and unloading activities would be managed either on the ground -level of the central parking garage or in temporary unloading spaces at each of the driveways accessing the central parking garage. As these activities would be comparable to commercial loading activities for the existing office park, net impacts would be negligible and be considered less than significant. As discussed above, the Project would not result in an exposure of persons to or a generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. The Project would also not increase surrounding noise levels by more than 5 dBA CNEL, the minimum threshold of significance at the sensitive receptors near the Project Site. As a result, the Project's on -site operational noise impacts would be considered less than significant. These intermittent sources of noise (i.e., traffic, mechanical equipment, use of outdoor spaces) could would generate marginal levels of noise during daytime, evening, and nighttime hours. Because noise impacts are logarithmic, it takes more than the intermittent low noise produced from the Project's operational sources to elevate existing noise levels. As illustrated in Table 9, these noise sources would not elevate daily noise levels. The Project would therefore not increase surrounding noise levels by more than 5 dBA CNEL, the minimum threshold of significance bat the sensitive receptors near the Project Site. As such, the Project would not result in an exposure of persons to or a generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general 27 RK Engineering Group, Inc. Wal-Mart/Sam's Club reference noise level, 2003. 28 Erica Walker et al, Harvard School of Public Health; Characteristics of Lawn and Garden Equipment Sound; 2017. These equipment generated a range of 74.0-88.5 dBA Leq at 50 feet. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 20 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouerlC1 18 — 1563 10/3/20 2023 plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. The Project's on -site operational noise impacts would be considered less than significant. Table 9 Composite Operations Noise Impacts Existing Calculated Project -Related Noise Sources dBA CNEL Project Ambient + Ambient Composite Project Receptor Noise A P Apartment Townhome HVAC Roof Vehicle Noise Levels Noise Levels Level (dBA Co urtyards ourtyards Courtyard Equipment Terrace Travel (dBA (dBA CNEL) CNEL) CNEL Cabrillo Park 57.5 10.7 11.6 22.6 12.5 24.9 27.3 57.5 Residence - 724 N. Parkcenter Dr. 57.5 12.9 8.2 33.1 26.0 17.2 34.0 57.5 Urgent Care - 2001 E. 41h St. 63.8 123.8 10.3 1 33.1 1 20.3 1 26.8 1 34.6 1 63.8 Health Care Facility- 1900 E.4'hSt. 66.3 13.5 -2.6 38.1 19.2 36.7 40.5 66.3 Residences - 618 Sherry Ln. 54.7 12.4 4.7 33.6 24.3 20.6 34.3 54.7 Source: DKA Planning, 2023. Off -Site Operational Noise The majority of the Project's operational noise impacts would be off -site from vehicles traveling to and from the development. The Project could add up to 875 net vehicle trips to the local roadway network on a peak weekday at the start of operations. However, given the shift from commercial office uses to a mixed -use residential and commercial development, the Project would result in a general improvement to on -street traffic during peak hours. Specifically, the Project would reduce 50 vehicle trips from local roadways during the A.M. peak hour. During the peak P.M. hour, the Project would generate the same number of vehicle trips as the existing development, resulting in no net increase in vehicle trips in the P.M. peak hour of traffic.29 This would represent a less than significant impact on local operational noise from project traffic.30 Because it takes a doubling of traffic volumes (i.e., 100 percent) to increase ambient noise levels by just 3 dBA Leq, the Project, which results in no increase in existing vehicle trips, would not increase ambient noise levels 5 dBA or more. Twenty-four hour CNEL impacts would similarly be minimal, far below criterion for significant operational noise impacts. As such, this impact would be considered less than significant. While the City's Noise Element focuses on a number of measures for Citywide implementation by municipal government, there are some objectives, policies, and programs that are applicable to development projects. Table 10 summarizes the Proposed Project's consistency with these. 29 Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. 30 Ibid. Cabrillo Town �Center Project PAGE 21 City of Santa Ana Noise l yn ouer1C1 18 - 1564 10/3/20 2023 Table 10 Project Consistency with City of Santa Ana General Plan Noise Element Objective/Policy/Program Project Consistency Policy N-1.1 (Noise Standards): Utilize Consistent. The Project's compliance and consistency established Citywide Noise Standards and with Citywide Noise Standards will be evaluated in this guidelines to inform land use decisions and CEQA analysis and will help inform the evaluation of guide noise management strategies. entitlement requests. Consistent. The site plan for the Proposed Project locates noise -sensitive residences away from traffic on 4th Street and the Santa Ana Freeway by clustering Policy N-1.2 (Sound Design): Encourage them to the northern and eastern portions of the functional and attractive designs to mitigate Project Site. This increases the buffer between excessive noise levels. residences and traffic noise while also allowing the proposed commercial uses along 4th Street and Cabrillo Park Drive to help shield noise from residences. Consistent. The site plan for the Proposed Project locates noise -sensitive residences away from traffic on 4th Street and the Santa Ana Freeway by clustering Policy N-1.4 (Sensitive Uses): Protect noise them to the northern and eastern portions of the sensitive land uses from excessive, unsafe, or Project Site. This increases the buffer between otherwise disruptive noise levels. residences and traffic noise while also allowing the proposed commercial uses along 4th Street and Cabrillo Park Drive to help shield noise from residences. Consistent. While this measure calls on the City to reduce noise generation and exposure from traffic and other transportation sources, the Project's sign design helps reduce exposure to transportation -related noise Policy N-2.1 (Transportation Related Noise): by locating noise -sensitive residences away from traffic on 4th Street and the Santa Ana Freeway by clustering Reduce noise generated from traffic, railroads, them to the northern and eastern portions of the transit, and airports to the extent feasible. Project Site. This increases the buffer between residences and traffic noise while also allowing the proposed commercial uses along 4th Street and Cabrillo Park Drive to help shield noise from residences. Policy N-2.2 (Stationary Related Noise): Consistent. The Project would eliminate noise impacts Minimize noise impacts from commercial and from existing commercial uses that are adjacent to industrial facilities adjacent to residential uses or residential neighborhoods to the northeast. zones where residential uses are permitted. Policy N-2.3 (Temporary and/or Nuisance Consistent. The Project's construction noise analysis Noise): Minimize the effects of intermittent, in this CEQA document will help minimize short-term short-term, or other nuisance noise sources. impacts and ensure that they are not considered significant. Policy N-3.1 (Residential Development): Consistent. The Project Site is nearly three miles Residential development within the John Wayne northwest of the 65 dBA CNEL Noise Contour. Airport (JWA) 65 dB(A) CNEL Noise Contour or greater is not supported. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 22 City of Santa Ana Noise iiyn I Kno 18 — 1565 10/3/20 2023 Table 10 Project Consistency with City of Santa Ana General Plan Noise Element Objective/Policy/Program Project Consistency Consistent. While this Policy calls on the City and other stakeholders to work with the County of Orange Policy N-3.2 (Flight Paths): Advocate that to direct future flight path selection away from. Existing future flight path selection be directed away from noise sensitive land uses, the Project Site is nearly existing noise sensitive land uses. three miles northwest of the 65 dBA CNEL Noise Contour and 1.3 miles northwest of the 60 dBA CNEL Noise Contour. Policy N-3.3 (Residential Mitigation): Require Consistent. The Project Site is nearly three miles all residential land uses in 60 dB(A) CNEL or 65 northwest of the 65 dBA CNEL Noise Contour. As dB(A) CNEL Noise Contours to be sufficiently such, no noise mitigation is needed to ensure interior mitigated so as not to exceed an interior noise levels of 45 dBA CNEL. standard of 45 dB(A) CNEL. Source: DKA Planning, 2023. b. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is located about 4.6 miles north of John Wayne Airport. Because the Proposed Project would not be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or within two miles of a public airport, the Project would not expose local workers or residents in the area to excessive noise levels. This would be considered a less than significant impact. Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 23 City of Santa Ana Noise iicyn ouer%1 18 — 1566 10/3/20 2o2s TECHNICAL APPENDIX Cabrillo Town Center Project PAGE 24 City of Santa Ana Noise gnt l RWC5 18 - 1567 10/3/20 2023 D®UGLAsKiim+Ass®eiATEs,LLC AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS City Council 18 — 1568 10/3/2023 Session Report 6/27/2023 Information Panel Name Comments Start Time Stop Time Run Time Serial Number Device !Name Model Type Device Firmware Rev Company Name Description Location User Name Summary Data Panel Cabrillo Park 6/27/2023 3:17:47 PM 6/27/2023 3:33:18 PM 00:15:31 SE40213991 SE40213991 Sound Examiner R.11C Description Metet Value Description Meter ysalu Leq 1 59.5 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB Weighting 1 A Response 1 SLOW Bandwidth 1 OFF Logged Data Chart Cabrillo Park: Logged Data Chart `II -In 0 60 is dB at 6/2712023 3:18.47 PM Lasm n-1 Lasmx-1 Le -1 4 f� Lzpk-1 Date/Time III1111111l1111111111111111111111111illll lill11111111111111 �111 III III J1111 11111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3:20 PM! 3:24 PM 3:28 PM 332 PM 2023 Jun 27 2023 Jun 27 2023 Jun 27 2023 Jun 27 City Council Douglas Kim +1�ssac at 10/3/2023 s, LLC Page 1 Logged Data Table Date/Time Lzpk-1 Lasmn-1 Lasmx-1 6/27/2023 3:18:47 PM 97 50.1 65.9 3:19:47 PM 102.3 58 63.9 3:20:47 PM 93 49 67.1 3:21:47 PM 97.1 47.6 78.5 3:22:47 PM 91.8 52.9 68.9 3:23:47 PM 96.4 48.7 71.1 3:24:47 PM 93.5 50 66.5 3:25:47 PM 109.2 49.9 62.6 3:26:47 PM 99.8 51.9 62.7 3:27:47 PM 99.6 52.3 65.4 3:28:47 PM 97.1 50.8 60.4 3:29:47 PM 96.3 49.8 66.4 3:30:47 PM 93.8 48.8 64.9 3:31:47 PM 95.5 46.6 64.3 3:32:47 PM 94.1 47.2 64.2 Leq-1 60.1 60.6 60.7 65.1 59.3 60.1 58 56.7 59.2 61.2 55.3 59.1 55.5 55.4 54.1 City Council Douglas Kim + Associa es,l LLC 10/3/2023 Page 2 Session Report 6/27/2023 Information Panel Name Comments Start Time Stop Time Run Time Serial Number Device !Name Model Type Device Firmware Rev Company Name Description Location User Name Summary Data Panel Urgent Care 6/27/2023 2:42:30 PM 6/27/2023 2:57:41 PM 00:15:11 SE40213991 SE40213991 Sound Examiner R.11C Description Metet Value Description Meter ysalu Leq 1 65.8 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB Weighting 1 A Response 1 SLOW Bandwidth 1 OFF Logged Data Chart Urgent Care: Logged Data Chart WCO 0 :f dB at 6/27/2022 2:46:30 PM Lasmn-1 Lasmx-1 Leq-1 Lzpk-1 Date/Time III 11111111111111111111111111111111I1111111111111111111111111111f 1111111111111111111111 I I III I I I till 111111111111111111111111111111111I1111111111111111111111 2:44 PM 248 PM 2:52 PM 2-56 PM 2022 Jun 27 2022 Jun 27 2022 Jun 27 2022 Jun 27 City Council 1� - 1572 10/3/2023 Douglas Kim + ssociates, LLC Page 1 Logged Data Table Date/Time 6/27/2023 2:43:30 PM 2:44:30 PM 2:45:30 PM 2:46:30 PM 2A7:30 PM 2A8:30 PM 2A9:30 PM 2:50:30 PM 2:51:30 PM 2:52:30 PM 2:53:30 PM 2:54:30 PM 2:55:30 PM 2:56:30 PM 2:57:30 PM Lzpk-1 Lasmn-1 Lasmx-1 Leq-1 101.6 45.7 69 63.7 110.6 51.5 74.4 65.5 97.6 53.1 73 65.5 100.3 55.4 71.4 64.8 94.2 54.5 70 64.7 96.8 58.5 72.9 66.3 97.9 52.9 73.6 64.7 101.5 57.9 78.7 69 103.5 56.7 71.4 64.8 101.6 51.9 69.4 63.3 100.1 55.3 82.3 67.2 93.5 55.3 72.1 64.1 97.9 58.1 71.8 66.9 97.4 60.2 69.7 65.7 102.7 53.8 76 67.4 City Council Douglas Kim +Associa es3LLC 10/3/2023 Page 2 Session Report 6/27/2023 Information Panel Name SE Corner Cabrillo Park and 4th St. Comments Start Time 6/27/2023 3:33:27 PM Stop Time 6/27/2023 3:48:40 PM Run Time 00:15:13 Serial Number SE40213991 Device Name SE40213991 Model Type Sound Examiner Device Firmware Rev R.11C Company Name Description Location User Name Summary Data Panel Description Meter Leq 1 Value Description Meter Valut 68.3 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB Weighting 1 A Response 1 SLOW Bandwidth 1 OFF Logged Data Chart SE Corner Cabrillo Park and 4th St.: Logged Data Chart `11;1m I 8: dB at 6/27/2023 3:.35:27 PM Lasmn-1 Lasmx-1 Leq-1 Lzpk-1 Date/Time 11111111111111 I1111 I III Illllllllllll III III I loll I tell I III III loll 111111IIl1R II11111111111 loll 1111111111111111111111111l1[II11111i1111lIIII Illl 111111111111 3:36 PM 3AO PM 3:44 P11A 3:48 PM 2023 Jun 27 202-3 Jun 27 2023 Jun 27 2023 Jun 27 City Council 1— 1574 10/3/2023 Douglas Kim + Associates, LLC P age 1 Logged Data Table Date/Time Lzpk-1 Lasmn-1 6/27/2023 3:34:27 PM 97.2 49.5 3:35:27 PM 96 58.8 3:36:27 PM 93.1 54.8 3:37:27 PM 97.6 55.6 3:38:27 PM 93.7 57.8 3:39:27 PM 93.5 55.4 3:40:27 PM 108.3 54.9 3:41:27 PM 104.5 56.2 3:42:27 PM 100.2 58.3 3:43:27 PM 102.4 60.7 3:44:27 PM 97.6 59.1 3:45:27 PM 96.5 56.4 3:46:27 PM 94.9 58.7 3:47:27 PM 93.1 58.7 3:48:27 PM 95.9 59.6 Lasmx-1 Leq-1 74 64.8 72.7 66.7 71.4 65.5 74 66.1 72.5 66.5 72.1 66.6 82.4 71.2 76.9 68.1 78.3 70.5 77.1 69.3 79 70 74.1 67.8 73.1 68.8 72.7 67.5 76.8 69.8 City Council 575 Douglas Kim + Associates, es, LLC Page 2 10/3/2023 Session Report 6/27/2023 Information Panel Name Comments Start Time Stop Time Run Time Serial Number Device !Name Model Type Device Firmware Rev Company Name Description Location User Name Summary Data Panel Sherry Lane 6/27/2023 2:59:26 PM 6/27/2023 3:15:00 PM 00:15:34 SE40213991 SE40213991 Sound Examiner R.11C Description Metet Value Description Meter yalu� Leq 1 56.7 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB Weighting 1 A Response 1 SLOW Bandwidth 1 OFF Logged Data Chart Sherry Lane: Logged Data Chart 80 i dB at 6/2712023 3:10:26 PM Lasmn-1 Lasmx-1 Leq-1 Lzpk-1 Date/-Fime III11111111l I11111111F1111111111i111111 II111111111111111l11111111l111111111111111114111111111111111l111111111FIIIIIl111111'11I111ll1111111111111111l Illlll 3:00 PM 3:D4 PM 3-0$ PM 3:12 PM 2023 Jun 27 2023 Jun 27 2023 Jun 27 2023 Jun 27 City Council 1� - 1576 10/3/2023 Douglas Kim + ssociates, LLC Page 1 Logged Data Table Date/Time 6/27/2023 3:00:26 PM 3:01:26 PM 3:02:26 PM 3:03:26 PM 3:04:26 PM 3:05:26 PM 3:06:26 PM 3:07:26 PM 3:08:26 PM 3:09:26 PM 3:10:26 PM 3:11:26 PM 3:12:26 PM 3:13:26 PM 3:14:26 PM Lzpk-1 Lasmn-1 Lasmx-1 Leq-1 96.7 47.3 62.4 54.2 90.8 52.2 65.9 58.4 90.1 48.1 64.1 57.8 94.8 51.6 63 56.1 89.3 50.6 63.7 56.8 93.7 49.6 71 60.3 88.8 49.6 60.6 54.5 83.8 48.2 60 52.5 83.7 47.9 60.2 53.8 93.3 47.9 68 57.5 89.9 48.6 66.4 57 96.5 51.9 63.3 57.2 88.5 50.1 61.7 55 90.1 50.3 64.5 57.1 88.7 51.8 66.6 57.5 City Council Douglas Kim + Associa es577 10/3/2023 , LLC Page 2 D®UGLAsKiim+Ass®eiATEs,LLC CONSTRUCTION NOISE CALCULATIONS City Council 18 — 1578 10/3/2023 Noise emissions of industry sources Receiver list Contribution levels of the receivers Source name Traffic lane Level Day dB(A) Night Cabrillo Park GF 60.2 0.0 Construction Site 60.2 Health Care Facility - 1900 E. 4th St. GF 61.8 0.0 Construction Site 61.8 Residence - 618 Sherry Ln. GF 50.8 0.0 Construction Site 50.8 Residence - 724 North Parkcener Dr. GF 59.6 0.0 Construction Site 59.6 Urgent Care Facility - 2001 E. 4th St. GF 62.6 0.0 Construction Site 62.6 Douglas Kim & Associates LLC 808 Holly Road Belmont, CA 94002 �� DOUGLASKiM+Ass- Sound Power Level (Lw) 115.6 1 dB Receptor Existing Leq Noise New Leq Difference LeqSignificant? Cabrillo Park 59.5 60.2 62.9 3.4 No Residence - 724 N. Parkcenter Dr. 59.5 59.6 62.6 3.1 No Urgent Care - 2001 E. 4th St. 65.8 62.6 67.5 1.7 No Health Care Facility - 1900 E. 4th St. 68.3 61.8 69.2 0.9 No Residence - 618 Sherry Ln. 56.7 50.8 57.7 1.0 No City Council 18 — 1583 10/3/2023 n���c��o • Q � C 3 _. CD ° - o n oa (o rr; o ocm D — n Ln '* rr ° O � c � r+ rt V) a N V A Cn F U'i I Q I (,n 1 lJi H d�-I �-x rIj _Pk �D 90 w I00 ,r l- 00IWIWIVI' w 4�- o to o o rn p 10 A Ol N I� lD N lD OR City Council 18 - 1584 10/3/2023 D®UGLAsKiim+Ass®eiATEs,LLC OPERATIONS NOISE CALCULATIONS City Council 18 — 1585 10/3/2023 Noise emissions of road traffic Traffic values Con tr Con Affe Gradi Statio ADT Vehicles type Vehicle name day evening night Speed devic Spe veh. Road surface Min / km Veh/24 Veh/h Veh/h Veh/h km/h km/h % % Townhouse Travel (EB 4th St) Traffic direction: in entry direction 0+00 220 Total 12 15 2 - none Average (of DGAC -1.7 / Automobiles 12 15 2 32 Medium trucks - - - - Heavy trucks Buses Motorcycles Auxiliary vehicle Townhouse Travel (WB 4th St.) Traffic direction: in entry direction 0+00 220 Total 12 15 2 - none Average (of DGAC z -1.7 / Automobiles 12 15 2 32 Medium trucks - - - - Heavy trucks Buses Motorcycles Auxiliary vehicle Apartment/Commercial Travel (Cabrillo Park Dr. DTraffic direction: in entry direction 0+00 1252 Total 75 70 9 - none Average (of DGAC -0.3 Automobiles 75 70 9 20 Medium trucks - - - - Heavy trucks Buses Motorcycles Auxiliary vehicle Apartment/Commercial Travel (4th St. Driveway) Traffic direction: in entry direction 0+00 1268 Total 75 72 10 - none Average (of DGAC -3.2 Automobiles 75 72 10 20 Medium trucks - - - - Heavy trucks Buses Motorcycles Auxiliary vehicle Douglas Kim & Associates LLC 808 Holly Road Belmont, CA 94002 Noise emissions of road traffic Traffic values Con tr Con Affe Gradi Statio ADT Vehicles type Vehicle name day evening night Speed devic Spe veh. Road surface Min / km Veh/24 Veh/h Veh/h Veh/h km/h km/h % % Townhouse Travel (EB 4th St) Traffic direction: in entry direction 0+00 220 Total 12 15 2 - none Average (of DGAC -1.7 / Automobiles 12 15 2 32 Medium trucks - - - - Heavy trucks Buses Motorcycles Auxiliary vehicle Townhouse Travel (WB 4th St.) Traffic direction: in entry direction 0+00 220 Total 12 15 2 - none Average (of DGAC z -1.7 / Automobiles 12 15 2 32 Medium trucks - - - - Heavy trucks Buses Motorcycles Auxiliary vehicle Apartment/Commercial Travel (Cabrillo Park Dr. DTraffic direction: in entry direction 0+00 1252 Total 75 70 9 - none Average (of DGAC -0.3 Automobiles 75 70 9 20 Medium trucks - - - - Heavy trucks Buses Motorcycles Auxiliary vehicle Apartment/Commercial Travel (4th St. Driveway) Traffic direction: in entry direction 0+00 1268 Total 75 72 10 - none Average (of DGAC -3.2 Automobiles 75 72 10 20 Medium trucks - - - - Heavy trucks Buses Motorcycles Auxiliary vehicle Douglas Kim & Associates LLC 808 Holly Road Belmont, CA 94002 Receiver list No. Receiver name Coordinates X Y in meter Buildhi side Floor Heighl abv.gr m Limit Day EveninNight Wen dB(A) Day Level EveninNight Lden dB(A) Conflict Day EveninNight Lden dB 1 Cabrillo Park 1142220373483 GF 46.36 25.9 26.3 14.5 27.1 2 3 4 5 Health Care Facilit - 1142220373452 North GF 45.04 _ _ _ _ _ _ 40.1 40.3 26.5 40.9 1 Residence - 618 Shei 1142203373484 East I GF 47.55 34.2 34.2 9.8 34.4 Residence - 724 Nortl 111422313734844South I GF 148.67 34.1 34.1 5.5 34.2 Ur ent Care Facility - 11422 1373459 West GF 145.891 35.6 35.7 16.5 36.0 Douglas Kim & Associates LLC 808 Holly Road Belmont, CA 94002 Contribution levels of the receivers Level Source name Traffic lane Day Evening Night Lden dB(A) Cabrillo Park GF 25.9 26.3 14.5 27.1 Apartment Courtyard 'A' 2.5 2.5 2.6 Apartment Courtyard 'B' 2.1 2.1 2.3 Apartment Courtyard 'C' -10.2 -10.2 -10.1 Apartment Courtyard 'D' -11.7 -11.7 -11.6 Apartment/Commercial Travel (4th St. Driveway) -23.1 -23.2 -31.8 -21.5 Apartment/Commercial Travel (Cabrillo Park Dr. Driveway) -19.0 -19.3 -28.3 -17.6 Apartments HVAC Front 10.0 10.0 - 10.1 Apartments HVAC Rear 19.8 19.8 - 19.9 HVAC 7.4 7.4 -73.6 7.5 HVAC1 6.9 6.9 -74.1 7.0 HVAC3 8.5 8.5 -72.5 8.6 HVAC4 8.0 8.0 -73.0 8.1 HVAC5 7.6 7.6 -73.4 7.8 HVAC6 9.1 9.1 -71.9 9.2 HVAC7 9.2 9.2 -71.8 9.3 HVAC8 4.9 4.9 -76.1 5.0 HVAC9 5.3 5.3 -75.7 5.4 HVAC10 4.6 4.6 -76.4 4.7 HVAC11 4.1 4.1 -76.9 4.2 HVAC12 3.6 3.6 -77.4 3.7 HVAC13 3.3 3.3 -77.7 3.4 HVAC14 3.3 3.3 -77.7 3.4 HVAC15 3.3 3.3 -77.7 3.4 HVAC16 3.2 3.2 -77.8 3.3 HVAC17 3.2 3.2 -77.8 3.3 HVAC18 3.2 3.2 -77.8 3.3 HVAC19 3.1 3.1 -77.9 3.2 HVAC20 3.1 3.1 -77.9 3.2 Roof Terrace 12.4 12.4 - 12.5 Townhomes Courtyard 11.5 11.5 - 11.6 Townhouse Travel (EB 4th St) 19.5 20.4 11.7 21.8 Townhouse Travel (WB 4th St.) 19.1 20.1 11.4 21.5 Health Care Facility - 1900 E. 4th St. GF 40.1 40.3 26.5 40.9 Apartment Courtyard 'A' 1.7 1.7 - 1.8 Apartment Courtyard 'B' 1.3 1.3 1.4 Apartment Courtyard 'C' -7.3 -7.3 -7.1 Apartment Courtyard 'D' 5.4 5.4 5.5 Apartment/Commercial Travel (4th St. Driveway) 28.1 27.9 19.4 29.7 Apartment/Commercial Travel (Cabrillo Park Dr. Driveway) 2.8 2.5 -6.4 4.2 Apartments HVAC Front 25.3 25.3 - 25.4 Apartments HVAC Rear 16.9 16.9 - 17.0 HVAC 13.9 13.9 -67.1 14.1 HVAC1 14.6 14.6 -66.4 14.7 HVAC3 12.9 12.9 -68.1 13.0 HVAC4 13.3 13.3 -67.7 13.4 HVAC5 13.7 13.7 -67.3 13.8 HVAC6 12.4 12.4 -68.6 12.5 HVAC7 11.8 11.8 -69.2 11.9 HVAC8 18.6 18.6 -62.4 18.7 HVAC9 17.5 17.5 -63.5 17.6 HVAC10 19.8 19.8 -61.2 19.9 HVAC11 22.1 22.1 -58.9 22.2 HVAC12 25.5 25.5 -55.5 25.6 HVAC13 30.5 30.5 -50.5 30.6 HVAC14 29.6 29.6 -51.4 29.7 HVAC15 29.0 29.0 -52.0 29.1 HVAC16 29.5 29.5 -51.5 29.6 HVAC17 28.6 28.6 -52.4 28.7 HVAC18 27.9 27.9 -53.1 28.0 HVAC19 27.3 27.3 -53.7 27.4 HVAC20 26.3 26.3 -54.7 26.5 Roof Terrace 19.1 19.1 - 19.2 Douglas Kim & Associates LLC 808 Holly Road Belmont, CA 94002 Contribution levels of the receivers Level Source name Traffic lane Day Evening Night Lden dB(A) Townhomes Courtyard -2.7 -2.7 - -2.6 Townhouse Travel (EB 4th St) 32.9 33.9 25.2 35.3 Townhouse Travel WB 4th St. 22.8 23.8 15.0 25.2 Residence - 618 Sherry Ln. GF 34.2 34.2 9.8 34.4 Apartment Courtyard 'A' -1.1 -1.1 - -1.0 Apartment Courtyard 'B' -2.6 -2.6 -2.5 Apartment Courtyard 'C' -14.6 -14.6 -14.5 Apartment Courtyard 'D' -15.3 -15.3 -15.2 Apartment/Commercial Travel (4th St. Driveway) -20.7 -20.9 -29.5 -19.1 Apartment/Commercial Travel (Cabrillo Park Dr. Driveway) 6.2 5.9 -3.0 7.6 Apartments HVAC Front 23.0 23.0 - 23.1 Apartments HVAC Rear 24.9 24.9 - 25.0 HVAC 21.1 21.1 -59.9 21.2 HVAC1 20.9 20.9 -60.1 21.0 HVAC3 21.8 21.8 -59.2 22.0 HVAC4 21.6 21.6 -59.4 21.7 HVAC5 21.3 21.3 -59.7 21.5 HVAC6 22.1 22.1 -58.9 22.2 HVAC7 21.9 21.9 -59.1 22.0 HVAC8 19.5 19.5 -61.5 19.6 HVAC9 19.7 19.7 -61.3 19.8 HVAC10 18.9 18.9 -62.1 19.0 HVAC11 18.5 18.5 -62.5 18.6 HVAC12 18.2 18.2 -62.8 18.3 HVAC13 17.9 17.9 -63.1 18.0 HVAC14 17.5 17.5 -63.5 17.7 HVAC15 17.2 17.2 -63.8 17.4 HVAC16 17.1 17.1 -63.9 17.2 HVAC17 16.8 16.8 -64.2 16.9 HVAC18 16.6 16.6 -64.4 16.8 HVAC19 16.2 16.2 -64.8 16.3 HVAC20 15.9 15.9 -65.1 16.1 Roof Terrace 24.2 24.2 - 24.3 Townhomes Courtyard 4.5 4.5 - 4.7 Townhouse Travel (EB 4th St) 14.3 15.3 6.5 16.6 Townhouse Travel WB 4th St. 14.5 15.4 6.7 16.8 Residence - 724 North Parkcener Dr. GF 34.1 34.1 5.5 34.2 Apartment Courtyard 'A' 0.3 0.3 - 0.4 Apartment Courtyard 'B' 2.5 2.5 2.6 Apartment Courtyard 'C' -5.7 -5.7 -5.5 Apartment Courtyard 'D' -8.0 -8.0 -7.9 Apartment/Commercial Travel (4th St. Driveway) -15.3 -15.5 -24.1 -13.7 Apartment/Commercial Travel (Cabrillo Park Dr. Driveway) -15.4 -15.7 -24.6 -14.0 Apartments HVAC Front 25.5 25.5 - 25.7 Apartments HVAC Rear 28.2 28.2 - 28.4 HVAC 14.6 14.6 -66.4 14.7 HVAC1 14.4 14.4 -66.6 14.5 HVAC3 14.8 14.8 -66.2 14.9 HVAC4 14.7 14.7 -66.3 14.8 HVAC5 14.6 14.6 -66.4 14.7 HVAC6 14.9 14.9 -66.1 15.0 HVAC7 14.0 14.0 -67.0 14.1 HVAC8 13.6 13.6 -67.4 13.7 HVAC9 14.5 14.5 -66.5 14.6 HVAC10 14.1 14.1 -66.9 14.2 HVAC11 18.1 18.1 -62.9 18.2 HVAC12 17.7 17.7 -63.3 17.9 HVAC13 17.5 17.5 -63.5 17.7 HVAC14 19.6 19.6 -61.4 19.7 HVAC15 19.8 19.8 -61.2 20.0 HVAC16 19.9 19.9 -61.1 20.0 HVAC17 20.1 20.1 -60.9 20.2 HVAC18 20.2 20.2 -60.8 20.4 Douglas Kim & Associates LLC 808 Holly Road Belmont, CA 94002 Contribution levels of the receivers Level Source name Traffic lane Day Evening Night Lden dB(A) HVAC19 18.7 18.7 -62.3 18.8 HVAC20 19.3 19.3 -61.7 19.4 Roof Terrace 25.9 25.9 - 26.0 Townhomes Courtyard 8.0 8.0 - 8.2 Townhouse Travel (EB 4th St) 10.4 11.4 2.6 12.7 Townhouse Travel WB 4th St. 10.0 11.0 2.3 12.4 Urgent Care Facility - 2001 E. 4th St. GF 35.6 35.7 16.5 36.0 Apartment Courtyard 'A' 2.9 2.9 - 3.0 Apartment Courtyard 'B' 5.3 5.3 5.4 Apartment Courtyard 'C' 13.8 13.8 13.9 Apartment Courtyard 'D' 22.8 22.8 22.9 Apartment/Commercial Travel (4th St. Driveway) 12.8 12.6 4.0 14.4 Apartment/Commercial Travel (Cabrillo Park Dr. Driveway) -16.6 -16.9 -25.8 -15.2 Apartments HVAC Front 28.6 28.6 - 28.7 Apartments HVAC Rear 23.3 23.3 - 23.4 HVAC 12.9 12.9 -68.1 13.0 HVAC1 13.7 13.7 -67.3 13.8 HVAC3 11.4 11.4 -69.6 11.5 HVAC4 12.0 12.0 -69.0 12.1 HVAC5 12.5 12.5 -68.5 12.6 HVAC6 10.8 10.8 -70.2 10.9 HVAC7 10.3 10.3 -70.7 10.4 HVAC8 10.5 10.5 -70.5 10.7 HVAC9 15.7 15.7 -65.3 15.8 HVAC10 11.7 11.7 -69.3 11.8 HVAC11 12.2 12.2 -68.8 12.3 HVAC12 12.3 12.3 -68.7 12.4 HVAC13 17.0 17.0 -64.0 17.1 HVAC14 19.0 19.0 -62.0 19.1 HVAC15 20.6 20.6 -60.4 20.7 HVAC16 21.7 21.7 -59.3 21.8 HVAC17 24.7 24.7 -56.3 24.9 HVAC18 21.6 21.6 -59.4 21.7 HVAC19 24.0 24.0 -57.0 24.2 HVAC20 29.2 29.2 -51.8 29.3 Roof Terrace 20.2 20.2 - 20.3 Townhomes Courtyard 0.2 0.2 - 0.3 Townhouse Travel (EB 4th St) 24.0 25.0 16.2 26.3 Townhouse Travel WB 4th St. 3.9 4.9 -3.9 6.2 Douglas Kim & Associates LLC 808 Holly Road Belmont, CA 94002 DOUGLAsKim+AssociATEs,LLC COMPOSITE NOISE MODELING OF PARKING GARAGE, HVAC AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, AND OUTDOOR LOUNGES AND DECKS City Council 18 — 1592 10/3/2023 i D0U61.AsKiM+AssociATEs,LLC Operational Noise Impacts Composite Noise Impact Summary Sensitive Receptor Existing CNEL Apartment Courtyards Townhome Courtyard HVAC Roof Terrace Vehicle Travel Project Composite Existing+ Project Increase Threshold of Significance Significant? Cabrillo Park 57.5 10.7 11.6 22.6 12.5 24.9 27.3 57.5 0.0 62.5 No Residence - 724 N. Parkcenter Dr. 57.5 12.9 8.2 33.1 26.0 17.2 34.0 57.5 0.0 62.5 No Urgent Care - 2001 E. 4th St. 63.8 23.8 0.3 33.1 20.3 26.8 34.6 63.8 0.0 68.8 No Health Care Facility- 1900 E. 4th 66.3 13.5 -2.6 38.1 19.2 36.7 40.5 66.3 0.0 71.3 No Residences - 618 Sherry Ln. 54.7 12.4 4.7 33.6 24.3 20.6 34.3 54.7 1 0.0 1 59.7 No Sensitive Receptor Cabrillo Park Source Sound Pressu 10^(x/10) Apartment Courtyards 10.7 12 Townhome Courtyard 11.6 14 HVAC 22.6 182 Roof Terrace 12.5 18 Vehicle Travel 24.9 309 1 1 Total 27.3 541.9857965 =IF(D17<0,"n/a=sum(D5:D16) Sensitive Receptor Residence - 724 N. Parkcenter Dr. Source ISound Pressu 10^(x/10) Apartment Courtyards 12.9 19 Townhome Courtyard 8.2 7 HVAC 33.1 2042 Roof Terrace 26.0 398 Vehicle Travel 17.2 52 1 1 Total 34.0 2525.431242 =IF(D'I7<0,"n/a=sum(D5:D16) Sensitive Receptor Ur ent Care - 2001 E. 4th St. Source ISound Pressu 10^fx/101 Apartment Courtyards 23.8 240 Townhome Courtyard 0.3 1 HVAC 33.1 2042 Roof Terrace 20.3 107 Vehicle Travel 26.8 479 1 1 Total 34.6 2875.474779 =IF(D17<0,"n/a=sum(D5:D16) Sensitive Receptor Health Care Facilit -1900 E. 4th St. Source Sound Pressu 10^(x/10) Apartment Courtyards 13.5 22 Townhome Courtyard -2.6 1 HVAC 38.1 6457 Roof Terrace 19.2 83 Vehicle Travel 36.7 4677 1 1 Total 40.5 11247.00683 =IF(D17<0,"n/a=sum(D5:D16) Sensitive Receptor Source Residences - 618 Sherry L 10^(x/10) Apartment Courtyards 12.4 17 Townhome Courtyard 4.7 3 HVAC 33.6 2291 Roof Terrace 24.3 269 Vehicle Travel 20.6 115 1 1 Total 34.3 2702.165713 =IF(D17<0,"n/a=sum(D5:D16) City Council 18 - 1593 10/3/2023 REVISED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT Q�OFES Slap ,��o S CIF �4" ti��I F2z c, m W � No. 78943 Exp3/31/24 ql CIVIL 4a� 4F' CAS-��O Prepared by: Shane S. Green, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Megan Lam Transportation Engineer II Santa Ana, California November 18, 2022 Prepared for: FRH REALTY 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92121 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Under the Supervision of: Richard E. Barretto, P.E. Principal Q�oFES Sr pNq c� CK No. 2006 Exp. 6/30/23 � qr TRAFFIC Limmt Lsw & Grennsmn, Engimem 2 beWtfft CJ«I(t sate M 1--me, CA 9514 M.6 U175 f %173 City Council 18 — 1594 10/3/202'T-'r "'1'"0""` TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope of Work...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area............................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 Project Description..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site Access............................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Pedestrian Circulation........................................................................................................... 5 3.0 Existing Conditions..................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Existing Street System.......................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Public Transit.............................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Bicycle Master Plan.............................................................................................................. 8 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes...................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Existing Intersection Conditions........................................................................................... 9 3.4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis ..................................... 9 3.4.2 Highway Capacity Manual 6 (HCM 6) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections)............................................................................................... 10 3.4.3 Level of Service Criteria........................................................................................... 10 3.4.4 Existing Level of Service Results............................................................................. 13 4.0 Traffic Forecasting Methodology............................................................................................ 16 5.0 Project Traffic Characteristics................................................................................................ 17 5.1 Project Traffic Generation.................................................................................................. 17 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment...................................................................... 17 5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................ 18 6.0 Future Traffic Conditions........................................................................................................ 21 6.1 Ambient Traffic Growth..................................................................................................... 21 6.2 Related Projects Traffic Characteristics.............................................................................. 21 6.3 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions............................................................................................. 27 6.4 Year 2026 and Year 2045 Traffic Volumes........................................................................ 27 6.4.1 Year 2026 Traffic Volumes...................................................................................... 27 6.4.2 Year 2045 Traffic Volumes...................................................................................... 27 7.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology.................................................................................... 28 7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds........................................................................................... 28 7.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios...................................................................................... 29 8.0 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis............................................................................. 30 8.1 Existing Plus Project Analysis............................................................................................ 30 8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions.................................................................. 30 8.2 Year 2026 Traffic Conditions............................................................................................. 34 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana V 1 1)0 "'1" I - h,,11. T,- e ' i A11, k, , 1;"I C ab,i 1" Tfi"J-1 — Pi „ 0 R, i-1 TT V 1, z, ! I L '0".!"' City Council 18 — 1595 10/3/2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAGE 8.2.1 Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Conditions............................................................... 34 8.2.2 Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions....................................................... 34 8.3 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions............................................................................................. 39 8.3.1 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions................................................................................... 39 8.3.2 Year 2045 Plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................... 39 9.0 State of California (Caltrans) Analysis................................................................................... 44 9.1 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) ......... 44 9.2 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................ 46 9.2.1 Existing Traffic Conditions....................................................................................... 46 9.2.2 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions.................................................................. 46 9.3 Year 2026 Traffic Conditions............................................................................................. 50 9.3.1 Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Conditions............................................................... 50 9.3.2 Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ........................................... 50 9.4 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions............................................................................................. 54 9.4.1 Year 2045 Buildout Traffic Conditions.................................................................... 54 9.4.2 Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions ................................................ 54 10.0 Daily Roadway Segment Analysis........................................................................................... 58 10.1 Existing Plus Project Analysis............................................................................................ 58 10.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................ 58 10.2 Year 2026 Traffic Conditions............................................................................................. 61 10.2.1 Year 2026 Plus Project Traffic Conditions......................................................... 61 10.3 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions............................................................................................. 64 10.3.1 Year 2045 Plus Project Traffic Conditions......................................................... 64 11.0 Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation................................................................... 67 11.1 Site Access.......................................................................................................................... 67 11.1.1 Gap Assessment.................................................................................................. 67 11.2 Internal Circulation Evaluation........................................................................................... 70 11.3 Sight Distance Evaluation................................................................................................... 70 12.0 Recommended Intersection Improvements............................................................................ 71 12.1 Planned Improvements........................................................................................................ 71 12.2 Recommended Improvements............................................................................................ 71 12.2.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................ 71 12.2.2 Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ..................................... 72 12.2.3 Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions .......................................... 73 12.3 Project -Related Fair -Share Contribution............................................................................ 74 13.0 Summary Of Findings And Conclusions................................................................................ 76 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana V 1 1)0 "'1" I ,,-fief! ( h,,11.) T, e ' i A11, k, , 1;"I C ab,i 1" Tfi"J-1 — Pi „ 0 R, i; 1 TT V 1, z, ! I L '0".!"' City Council 18 - 1596 10/3/2023 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Traffic Study Scope of Work B. Existing Traffic Count Data C. Year 2045 Modeling Worksheets D. Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets E. Caltrans Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets F. Project Driveway Level of Service Calculation Worksheets LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers III LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N�\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabnll, Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Report\4531 C,brill, Tnw Center Mixed -Use P roiect Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1597 10/3/2023 LIST OF FIGURES SECTION —FIGURE # FOLLOWING PAGE 1-1 Vicinity Map.....................................................................................................................2 2-1 Existing Aerial Site Photograph.......................................................................................5 2-2 Proposed Site Plan............................................................................................................5 3-1 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls..............................................8 3-2 OCTA Transit Map..........................................................................................................8 3-3 Transit Stop Locations.....................................................................................................8 3-4 City of Santa Ana Bikeway Master Plan........................................................................8 3-5 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes......................................................................9 3-6 Existing PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes.....................................................9 5-1 Existing Office Traffic Distribution Pattern ..................................................................20 5-2 Proposed Project Traffic Distribution Pattern ...............................................................20 5-3 Existing Office AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.........................................................20 5-4 Existing Office PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes........................................20 5-5 AM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes......................................................................20 5-6 PM Peak Hour and Daily Project Traffic Volumes.....................................................20 5-7 AM Peak Hour Net Project Traffic Volumes...............................................................20 5-8 PM Peak Hour and Net Daily Project Traffic Volumes..............................................20 5-9 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................................20 5-10 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes..............................20 6-1 Location of Cumulative Projects....................................................................................21 6-2 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes..................................................21 6-3 PM Peak Hour and Daily Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes..................................21 6-4 Year 2026 Cumulative AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes............................................27 6-5 Year 2026 Cumulative PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ...........................27 6-6 Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .......................27 6-7 Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ......27 6-8 Year 2045 Buildout AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.................................................27 6-9 Year 2045 Buildout PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes................................27 6-10 Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................27 6-11 Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ........... 27 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers jV LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana V 1 1)0 "'1"I ,,-fief!( ),,11.. T, i A11, k,, 1;"I Cab,i 1"Tfi"J-1 —F „ 0 R, i; 1TT V 1, z, ! I L '0".!"' City Council 18 — 1598 10/3/2023 LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED) SECTION —FIGURE # FOLLOWING PAGE 11-1 SU-30 Truck Turning Analysis ............................................................ 70 11-2 Project Driveway 1 Sight Distance Analysis for Right -Turning Vehicles 11-3 Project Driveway 2 Sight Distance Analysis for Right -Turning Vehicles 12-1 Planned and Recommended Improvements ................................................ 70 70 73 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers V LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana V 1 0o.'„T"I nip-1,1(:L(II. I,c A11, k " 1;"I Cab,i 1"Tfi"J-1 —T „ 0 R, i; 1TT V 1, z, I L '0 "_. _!"' City Council 18 — 1599 10/3/2023 LIST OF TABLES SECTION —TABLE # PAGE 2-1 Project Development Summary ........................................................................................ 6 3-1 Level of Service Criteria For Signalized Intersections................................................11 3-2 Level of Service Criteria For Unsignalized Intersections...........................................12 3-3 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ................................................. 14-15 5-1 Project Traffic Generation Rates and Forecast...............................................................19 5-2 Project Directional Distribution Pattern .........................................................................20 6-1 Location and Description of Cumulative Projects .................................................... 22-24 6-2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Generation Forecast .................................................... 25-26 8-1 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ............................ 31-33 8-2 Year 2026 Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ......................... 36-38 8-3 Year 2045 Buildout Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis .............................. 41-43 9-1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections(HCM).......................................45 9-2 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis - Caltrans .................47 9-3 Existing Plus Project Caltrans Off -Ramp Peak Hour Queuing Analysis ................. 48-49 9-4 Year 2026 Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis - Caltrans ..............51 9-5 Year 2026 Cumulative Caltrans Off -Ramp Peak Hour Queuing Analysis ............. 52-53 9-6 Year 2045 Buildout Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis - Caltrans ...................55 9-7 Year 2045 Buildout Caltrans Off -Ramp Peak Hour Queuing Analysis .................. 56-57 10-1 Existing Daily Roadway Segments Level of Service Analysis Summary ............... 59-60 10-2 Year 2026 Cumulative Daily Roadway Segments Level of Service AnalysisSummary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 62-63 10-3 Year 2045 Buildout Daily Roadway Segments Level of Service AnalysisSummary................................................................................................... 65-66 11-1 Project Driveway Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis........................................68 11-2 Right -Turn Out Vehicle Gap Analysis........................................................................... 69 12-1 Year 2045 Buildout Project Fair -Share Contribution.....................................................75 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers Vi LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N\Report\4531 C,brill, Tnw Center Mixed -Use P roiect Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1600 10/3/2023 REVISED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT Santa Ana, California November 18, 2022 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Traffic Circulation Analysis report addresses the potential traffic impacts and circulation needs associated with Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project (hereinafter referred to as Project) in the City of Santa Ana. The Project site is a 8.97±-acre rectangular -shaped parcel of land within the Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone that is generally located north of Fourth Street and east of Cabrillo Park Drive in the City of Santa Ana, California. The subject property is currently developed with four (4) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 173,025 square -feet (SF) of floor area and approximately 617 surface parking spaces. 1.1 Scope of Work This traffic report documents the findings and recommendations of a traffic analysis conducted by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) to determine the need for potential Project -related circulation improvements. The traffic analysis evaluates the existing operating conditions at twenty-five (25) key study intersections and project driveways within the project vicinity, estimates the trip generation potential of the proposed Project, and forecasts future near -term (Year 2026) and long-term (Year 2045) operating conditions without and with the proposed Project. Where necessary, intersection improvements are identified. The scope of work for this traffic analysis was developed in collaboration with City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency — Traffic Engineering staff and in consideration of Mitigation Measure (MM) -OZ 4.12-2 and MM-OZ 4.12-4 of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Metro East Mixed -Use (MEMU) Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Projects (August 2018). This traffic report satisfies the traffic requirements of the City of Santa Ana. Appendix A presents the scope of work that was developed in conjunction with and reflects input City of Santa Ana Public Works Department staff. The project site has been visited and an inventory of adjacent area roadways and intersections was performed. Existing weekday peak hour traffic count information has been collected at twenty-five (25) key study intersections for use in the preparation of intersection level of service calculations. Information concerning cumulative projects (planned and/or approved) in the vicinity of the proposed Project has been researched at the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and City of Orange. Based on our research, there are twenty-eight (28) related projects located in the City of Santa Ana, eight (8) related projects located in the City of Tustin and one (1) related project located in the City of Orange. The thirty-seven (37) related projects were considered in the cumulative traffic analysis for this project. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 1 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N\Report\4531 C,brill, Tnw Center Mixed -Use P roiect Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1601 10/3/2023 This traffic report analyzes existing and future weekday daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic conditions for a near -term (Year 2026) and long-term (Year 2045) traffic setting upon completion of the proposed Project. Near -term (Year 2026) cumulative daily and peak hour traffic forecasts were projected by incorporating a one percent (1.0%) annual growth rate and the trip generation potential of thirty-seven (37) related projects. Long-term (Year 2045) daily and peak hour traffic forecasts were projected based on modeled traffic projections prepared by OCTA utilizing the OCTAM 5.0 Year 2045 Model. 1.2 Study Area The twenty-five (25) intersections listed below provide regional and local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact investigation. Key Study Intersections 1. Elk Lane at First Street (Santa Ana) 2. I-5 SB On -Ramp at First Street (Santa Ana/Caltrans) 3. Cabrillo Park Drive at First Street (Santa Ana) 4. Golden Circle Drive at First Street (Santa Ana) 5. Tustin Avenue at First Street (Tustin) 6. Yorba Street at First Street (Tustin) 7. I-5 SB On-Ramp/Mabury Street at 41' Street (Santa Ana/Caltrans) 8. I-5 NB Ramps at 4a' Street (Santa Ana/Caltrans) 9. Cabrillo Park Drive at 4n' Street (Santa Ana) 10. Golden Circle Drive at 4a' Street (Santa Ana) 11. Park Center Drive at 4' Street (Santa Ana) 12. Tustin Avenue at 4' Street (Santa Ana) 13. SR-55 SB Ramps at 4t' Street (Santa Ana/Caltrans) 14. SR-55 NB Ramps at 4 b Street (Tustin/Caltrans) 15. Yorba Street at 41b Street (Tustin) 16. Cabrillo Park Drive at State Fund Access Road (Santa Ana) 17. Cabrillo Park Drive at Xerox Center Access Road (Santa Ana) 18. Cabrillo Park Drive at 171b Street (Santa Ana) 19. Cabrillo Park Drive at Wellington Avenue (Santa Ana) 20. Tustin Avenue at Wellington Avenue (Santa Ana) 21. Mabury Street at Fruit Street (Santa Ana) 22. Cabrillo Park Drive at Fruit Street (Santa Ana) 23. Park Center Drive at Fruit Street (Santa Ana) 24. Tustin Avenue at Fruit Street (Santa Ana) 25. Cabrillo Park Drive at Park Court Place (Santa Ana) Figure 1-1 presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the Project and depicts the study locations and surrounding street system. The Level of Service (LOS) investigations at these key locations were used to evaluate the potential traffic -related impacts associated with area growth, cumulative projects and the proposed Project. When necessary, this report recommends intersection and/or roadway improvements that may be required to accommodate future traffic volumes and restore/maintain an acceptable Level of Service. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 2 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N�\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabnll, Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Report\4531 C,brill, Tnw Center Mixed -Use P roiect Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1602 10/3/2023 : wenI wells Fargo uanK rarmer uoys yr I Jack m the Box W � 17th 5t opeyes © LPouisiana Kitchen z 17th St 18 El Poll. L.- • 1 Ah St Navy Federal Slarbucks El Torilo© 17th 51 4 ©CltibenR 1 Credit Union 4_ a 'g ema © Superlor Grocers®© E' Albensons® Q Ross Dress for Less Enderle Center 9elecan Grill- Q ©Malaysian Bistro QCVS S1 2 n n a Caesars ; L i1lle Pi a The Crah Cooker © < x E1smn R c+xn tiY p P Vantlenbet9 I E let,A U_ ^E Black Angus Sieakhouseo = we carme. nestnway Ewoanlnptwr ava 19 i s. wa � � • EWNI�nO�an Ore 3 � Wallington Axu a F � _ ® S EWHlmarm Ave i `•'� a' 3,xua Pn y ' ab • m g� f � EWCllinglon Ave• w Lu oil ' era sr g _ Redwoods HameownersQ Orange County© ,v m aaneorree � Association vah Global Medical Comer N,.,xow avwa a NfaalWa s � a N. i �,dFki' c e� wSr N 21abury Park © E `y p® y® 52 Va,4r D� a chemam. a v�i EFunR • •E`"�ns • EkuiiS� �, miry. `yap �a Lake Dianne AparIrn-tsQ O _ `3 snvnraaK or � �4ava, i s Cabrillo Park 9 Village Apartments Qn.ayOr'n�yisy Ameganu4 Way a n E6Vr St © Enihs. `= �nRed Crosse �".' .......... °.% RI1p......Y anon Center 3 m wvsid,ry to Helen Eslock © u E am s, e ��iiiiiSiiiiiiiSii.� • Elementary School Chevron Q z 'C c �. D ♦ z •'Yalnk Tog. hero The UPS Store `; Cellfarnla Department /�1�[73 ,, JJ a da`r Tr 10 11 0 13 i U° O 14 15 O Ati11n Dr CC = To is De Ands E 4th S1 E41h St n n E4th SI y O of Ialicn_. (J�,,r R • • ® •'Consul do de lReHimQ • 9 Del •ac. • ag1y Irvineelvtl • Irvine Blvd Encompass Health In 51 Joseph Heritage 9 Rehabilitation Hoaphal._ - ne Q Our Lady of Guadalupe® y v • Medical Group Santa. ` m o ns Church (3rd) P9:n s Nu eteen0l a )or Tires Ilantas._ Q Molel fi Sama Ana vApartment Homes = r 4? Social Securilyjl• a f A�lv.El Ran"Un a ` _ The Path 81ke Shop d i ,M MCD... fdte N ©El Poll. N.reno '� /p�dministratior'/�J ��y � Q »© s n N E First St E First St lJ ©jts:5 l" Im j O • • Fampoundinharmecy • W Flf$t St • W First St „ W First S[ E First St N Santa All DMV ® Q WSS - 666111 Advance hall, r �-' Peppenree i I Slnr lra� r: nnf Tnclin9 W r n -Park SOURCE: GOOGLE KEY FIGURE 1-1 ® = STUDY INTERSECTON N NO SCALE = ROADWAY SEGMENT ;= PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP 0 CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1603 10/3/2023 Included in this Traffic Impact Analysis are: ■ Existing traffic counts, ■ Estimated project traffic generation/distribution/assignment, ■ Estimated cumulative project traffic generation/distribution/assignment, ■ AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing conditions, ■ AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing plus project conditions, ■ AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for future near -term (Year 2026) traffic conditions without and with the proposed Project, ■ AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for future long-term (Year 2045) traffic conditions without and with the proposed Project, ■ Caltrans Analysis, ■ Site Access Evaluation, ■ Queueing Analysis, ■ Internal Circulation and Sight Distance Evaluation, and ■ Recommended Intersection Improvements. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 3 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1604 10/3/2023 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project site is a 8.97±-acre rectangular -shaped parcel of land within the Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone that is generally located north of Fourth Street and east of Cabrillo Park Drive in the City of Santa Ana, California. The Project site has an existing zoning of Professional (P) and is identified with a "Village Center District" designation in the MEMU Overlay Zone. The subject property is currently developed with four (4) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 173,025 square -feet (SF) of floor area and approximately 617 surface parking spaces. The northern half of the Project site, addressed at 515 - 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, is developed with two (2) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 92,115 SF, whereas the southern half, addressed at 1907 - 1971 E. Fourth Street, is developed with two (2) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 80,910 SF. Vehicular access to the Project site is currently provided via two (2) right -turn only driveways on Fourth Street, one (1) right -turn only driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive, and a full access driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park Drive; No cross vehicular access is now provided with the adjacent commercial property to the east. See Figure 1-1, a Vicinity Map that illustrates the general location of the Project and surrounding street system. Figure 2-1 is an existing aerial photograph of the Project site. The proposed Project will include the development of up to 507 residential apartment/townhomes units with a total of 1,025 parking spaces. Site "A" is proposed as five -story apartment podium with up 449 apartment homes consisting of 23 studio units, 264 one -bedroom units, 148 two -bedroom units, and 14 two-bedroom/live-work units, and 5,800 square -feet (SF) of ground floor retail space and 11,400 SF of live/work commercial/office space (estimated at 814 SF per live -work unit) "wrapped" around a six -level parking structure with a total of roughly 898 parking spaces. On -site facilities/amenities for residents of Site "A include 6,100 SF of commercial space that would be dedicated to the leasing office, mailroom and co -work space and business center, lobby/lounge, pool/spa, and a fitness center for residents, and courtyards. Site "B" is proposed as residential townhome community consisting of three-story townhomes with a total of 58 units and parking supply of 127 spaces consisting of garage spaces and surface parking. On -site facilities/amenities of the Site "B includes open space/courtyards. Although not counted as a part of the Project's parking supply, an additional 23 on -street parking spaces will be provided on Park Court Place. Table 2-1 provides a summary of the proposed Project components. Figure 2-2 presents the proposed Site Plan, prepared by AO Architects, dated 11/10/2022. It should be noted that the northeast curb at Cabrillo Park Drive and Fourth Street has been modified to allow for southbound U-turn movements. Further, the proposed Site Plan illustrates the implications of the construction of a westbound right -turn lane on Fourth Street at Cabrillo Park Drive, which is identified as a recommended improvements in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. The Project is expected to be constructed and completed by Year 2026, which has been utilized to assess the Project's potential traffic impacts at full occupancy of the project within an opening year traffic setting. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 4 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 -Fairfield Cahrilln Tnwn Center. Santa Ana\Rennrt\4531 Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixed -Ilse Prniect ReWsed TIA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 - 1605 10/3/2023 2.1 Site Access Vehicular access to Site A's parking structures will be provided from a proposed "right -turn in/right- turn out" driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive (Driveway 1) and a proposed "right -turn in/right-turn out" driveway on Fourth Street (Driveway 2) , whereas access to Site B will be provided via a "full access" driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park; No cross vehicular access is proposed between the two Project sites or with the adjacent commercial property to the east. 2.2 Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrian circulation for the proposed Project would be provided via existing public sidewalks along Park Court Place, Cabrillo Park Drive, and 4th Street within the vicinity of the Project. The existing sidewalk system within the Project vicinity provides direct connectivity to the existing development located along major thoroughfares. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 5 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N('enter Mixed -lice Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1606 10/3/2023 SOURCE: GOGGLE KEY FIGURE 2-1 �-�= PROJECT SITE 0 N No SCALE EXISTING AERIAL SITE PLAN CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1607 10/3/2023 SOURCE: ARCHITECTS ORANGE FIGURE 2-2 ®"o scALe PROPOSED SITE PLAN CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1608 10/3/2023 TABLE 2-1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Land Use / Project Description Project Development Totals Cabrillo Town Center Mixed Use ❑ Site A: 5-Story Wrap 0 Studio Units (600 SF) 23 Units (5.1%) 0 1 Bedroom Units (750 SF) 264 Units (58.8%) 0 2 Bedroom Units (1,070 SF) 148 Units (33.0%) 0 Live -Work / 2 Bedroom Units (1,200 SF) 14 Units (3.1%) Total Apartment Units: 449 Units ❑ Site A: Commercial o Retail 5,800 SF o Live/Work Commercial 11,400 SF Total Commercial Space: 17,200 SF ❑ Site B: 3-Story Townhomes 58 units 0 Total Residential Units: 507 Units Parking Supply ❑ Site A — Parking Structure 0 Resident Parking 808 spaces 0 Retail/Commercial/Guest Parking 90 spaces Site A Parking Supply: 898 spaces ❑ Site B 0 Resident - two -car Garage per unit 116 spaces 0 Resident/Guest — Open Parking 11 spaces Site B Parking Supply: 127 spaces Total Parking Supply. 1, 025 spaces LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nirfield Ca";i n Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Rennrt\4531 Cabrillo ToCenter Mixed-1 Ts P—j— Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1609 10/3/2023 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing Street System The principal local network of streets serving the project site is First Street, 4th Street, 17th Street, Park Court Place, Cabrillo Park Drive, and Tustin Avenue. The following discussion provides a brief synopsis of these key area streets. The descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions. First Street a four to six -lane, divided roadway in the vicinity of the project, oriented in the east - west direction that provides two or three lanes in each direction separated by a raised median island. The posted speed limit on First Street is 35 mph. On -street parking is not permitted along this roadway. A traffic signal controls the study intersections of First Street at Mabury Street/Elk Lane, I-5 SB On Ramp, Cabrillo Park Drive, Golden Center Drive, Tustin Avenue, and Yorba Street. 4th Street is a six -lane, divided roadway oriented in the east -west direction that provides three eastbound and three westbound travel lanes separated by a raised median island. The posted speed limit on Fourth Street is 40 miles per hour (mph). On -street parking is not permitted along this roadway in the vicinity of the project. Traffic signals control the study intersections of Fourth Street at I-5 SB Off -Ramp, I-5 NB On -Ramp, Cabrillo Park Drive, Golden Circle Drive, Park Center Drive, Tustin Avenue, SR-55 SB Ramps, SR-55 NB Ramps and Yorba Street. East of the SR-55 Freeway, Fourth Street is known as Irvine Boulevard within the City of Tustin. 17th Street is a six -lane, divided roadway oriented in the east -west direction. The posted speed limit on 17th Street is 40 mph. On -street parking is not permitted on either side of this roadway in the vicinity of the Project. A traffic signal controls the study intersection of 171h Street at Cabrillo Park Drive. Park Court Place is a two-lane, divided roadway oriented in the east -west direction. The posted speed limit on Park Court Place is 25 mph. On -street parking is not permitted on either side of this roadway in the vicinity of the Project. Cabrillo Park Drive is a four -lane, divided roadway that borders the project site to the east, oriented in the north -south direction. The posted speed limit on Cabrillo Park Drive is 35 mph. On -street parking is not permitted along this roadway in the vicinity of the project. Traffic signals control the study intersections of Fourth Street, State Fund Access Road, Xerox Centre Access Road, and First Street. Tustin Avenue is a six -lane, divided roadway, oriented in the north -south direction. On -street parking is not permitted along this roadway in the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on Tustin Avenue is 40 mph. Traffic signals control the study intersections of Tustin at Fourth Street, First Street, Wellington Avenue, and Fruit Street. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 7 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1610 10/3/2023 Figure 3-1 presents an inventory of the existing roadway conditions for the arterials and intersections evaluated in this report. This figure identifies the number of travel lanes for key arterials, as well as intersection configurations and controls for the key area study intersections. 3.1.1 Public Transit Public transit bus service is provided in the project area by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Four (4) OCTA bus routes operate within the vicinity of the project site on First Street, 4th Street, 17th Street, and Tustin Avenue, which consists of the following: ■ OCTA Route 60: The major routes of travel include 17th Street and Tustin Avenue. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on 17th Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the northwest and southwest corners. Route 60 operates on approximate 20-minute headways during weekdays and 15-minute headways on weekends. ■ OCTA Route 64: The major route of travel is First Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on First Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the southeast and northwest corners. Route 64 operates on approximate 15-minute headways on the weekdays and 20-minutes on the weekends. ■ OCTA Route 71: The major route of travel is Tustin Avenue. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on Tustin Avenue at 4th Street in the northeast and southwest corners. Route 71 operates on approximate 50-minute headways on the weekdays and 45-minute headways on the weekends. ■ OCTA Route 463: The major route of travel is 4th Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on 4th Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the northeast and southeast corners. Route 463 operates on approximate 25-minute headways on the weekdays and no bus service on the weekends. Figure 3-2 graphically illustrates the transit routes of OCTA within the vicinity of the project. Figure 3-3 identifies the locations of the existing bus stops in proximity to the Project site. 3.2 Bicycle Master Plan The City of Santa Ana promotes bicycling as a means of mobility and a way in which to improve the quality of life within its community. The Bikeway Master Plan recognizes the needs of bicycle users and aims to create a complete and safe bicycle network throughout the City. Currently, not many bicycle facilities exist in the study area. However, review of Figure 3-4, which presents the City's Bikeway Master Plan, shows that a Class I bike path is proposed to be built along Tustin Avenue within the vicinity of the Project. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers g LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-11— Proi— Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1611 10/3/2023 SEE i TTH 18 0 GO NP 40 T 40 NP \ 4 PHASE \ SIGNA SE \\ 6 P PHASE �\ _ 5 PHASE �\ P / \ _ 5 PHAS \ SI NAL \ / s PHASE \v �N S SPLIT _N 5 SPLIT SIGNAL _ = IC�NAL SIGNAL o N S SPLIT ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST �\ O /- �\ 10 /— �\ 11 t9 wEuwcTON f5 ` , 'T`'qr' , , 25 \ 3 PHASE \ r 3 PHASE \ 6GGiPiJJH ASE \ 5 PHASE \ ONE-WAY \ -� 8 P, AVg ©O \ SIGNAL \ y SIGNAL \� N/S SPLIT \ SIGNAL \ STOP \\ • SIGNAL -5 SB 01-RAMP/-5 NB RAMPS ® CABRILLO PARK DR ® GOLDEN CIRCLE DR ® PARK CENTER DR ® NSTIN AVE MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST v�O 4TH ST 13 /— �\ 14 /— �\ 15 /— �\ 16 /� �\ 17 I \ / I \ / FRUIT 21 © zU P ® ST ® / -� ` I I ~ I 1 -Jl(- \ 'Yl I If 35 P 3 \ 3 PHASE \ 3 PHASE \ 6&&PHASE 3 PHASE 3 PHASE F \ _ — SIGNAL \ ~ — SIGNAL \ S/S ASPLIT \ _ SIGNAL \ _ — SIGNAL o SR-55 SB RAMPS 0 SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR —,� 4TH ST IRVINE BLVD IRVINE BLVD STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD- PARK CT®.'P('.:.:78 21 .9 '.::::'� 10 11 ST 13 14 15 40 NP �I� i��II , III F } o 4TH \ / \ i / \ / \ -+ / / - N \ 5 PHASE \ TWO-WAY \ 5 PHASE \ ALL "WAY \ ALL `WA 6 I IGNAL _ _ TOP I ICNJAL _ TOP \ _ STOP ftST.ATE FUND ACCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 s 16 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST OX CENIR CGE55 RD _ - i©o — — — rlHsr sD sr f//Np ©// \\ ®// A ®a 35 O NP © I / TWO-WAY 2 PHASE T1Y0-WAY \� TOP \ SIONAL \ STOP PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PL KEY = APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 3-1 = TRAFFIC SIGNAL,t= STOP SIGN P = PARKING, NP = NO PARKING Dj U = UNDIVIDED, D = DIVIDED z = NUMBER of TRAVEL LANES EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS NO SCALE (XX)= POSTED SPEED LIMIT (MPH) AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS F = FREE—RIGHr, oL = OVERLAP = PROJECT SITE CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1612 10/3/2023 SOURCE: OCTA KEY FIGURE 3-2 N•;3 = PROJECT SITE NO SCALE OCTA TRANSIT MAP CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1613 10/3/2023 PlanneoNarenlntsotl- � °! Santa Ana htealth Center OO � m K O Q O 17ih St S1a.rbucks 17 Target Q 0 Q . 1 Zoa's Bakery O $ Superior Grocers 4 Ross Dress for Less Q a n E iSth 51 sii. �r e � c ,��'� VznEenti� T _ m Eilack Angus Steakhouse v o E Vfoshinglrfl Aua M A B U R V PARK Ew�i! pm Av. ® � a dpnuWOAes j m Pall Redwoods Homeowners Q Oran/'_ aunty w Z' a. ASSociatlon Global Medi6MCenter � rv� 4 z ® o J Q arms � Gbmhom or � o Lake Dianne Apartments 9 Eli m _ me n nheAian4IN r6,` Cabrillo Park a ::e� nmagansn wnr ee,i E ctR S: Helen EstockQ W..beyt.n 4i ,r I.•. .. ..tt - EGR. Sr Elementary School I•••• • • ••� Minor ❑r Colun © Tustin ° :VionQ SADDLEBACK �I •".,�1t - V I E W Consula3o4e MCxiGo Wneelvd Iry v O a Motel 6Santa Ana 4 © Social Security Q ® AdministQon 9 rs, � Q� 0 r Uald � {fi_i!S"o c Q Q Q v Santa Ana DMV 0 E rlrst st ss W First Si 0 N 0 00 x g ; = Park t: a d oz w zrvn sr .,. SOURCE: GOOGLE LINSCOTT KEY FIGURE 3-3 N•:] = PROJECT SITE GREENSPAN NO SCALE Q = TRANSIT STOP TRANSIT STOP LOCATIONS CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1614 10/3/2023 SOURCE: CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LINSCOTT KEY FIGURE 3-4 •;_� = PROJECT SITE - = CLASS III BIKE ROUTE/BOULEVARD N NO SCALE = CLASS I PATH - = CLASS IV CYCLE TRACK = CLASS II BIKE LANE CITY OF SANTA ANA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1615 10/3/2023 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes Twenty-five (25) key study intersections have been identified as the locations at which to evaluate existing and future traffic operating conditions. Some portion of potential project -related traffic will pass through each of these intersections, and their analysis will reveal the potential need for Project - related circulation improvements. Due to the COVID-19 virus, traffic patterns have changed and are significantly lower than pre- COVID-19 conditions. As such, to establish "baseline" traffic conditions, pre-COVID-19, historic Year 2019 AM and PM peak hour traffic counts were obtained at the two (2) study intersections. The historic data was grown by 0.5% per year for three years to create Year 2022 baseline conditions. Figures 3-5 and 3-6 illustrate the existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the twenty-five (25) key study intersections evaluated in this report, respectively. Figure 3-6 also presents the existing average daily traffic volumes for twelve (12) key roadway segments in the vicinity of the proposed Project. Appendix B contains the detailed peak hour and daily traffic count sheets for the key intersections and roadway segments evaluated in this report. 3.4 Existing Intersection Conditions Existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the twenty-five (25) key study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology for signalized intersections and the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6 (HCM 6) for unsignalized intersections. 3.4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis In conformance with Cities of Santa Ana, Tustin and Orange County CMP requirements, existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the key signalized study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. The ICU technique is intended for signalized intersection analysis and estimates the volume to capacity (V/C) relationship for an intersection based on the individual V/C ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent signal (green) time, and thus capacity, required by existing and/or future traffic. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal signal timing. Per City of Santa Ana requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) for through lanes and 1,600 vph for left -turn lanes and right -turn lanes. A clearance adjustment factor of 0.05 was added to each Level of Service calculation. Per City of Tustin requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,700 for through and all turn lanes. A clearance adjustment factor of 0.05 was added to each Level of Service calculation. The ICU value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The ICU value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an intersection; it is not intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 9 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N('enter Mixed -lice Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1616 10/3/2023 76�` 62 r 221 100 F /J 448\ 18 ST \ I \ 6b8y / I \ 193 } r \ a } \ ns } r \ 61470 490�d 494�'" 341�` _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST © O19 A�63/3\9 \ / "\4/5\4 12 N/mm,� r� L } 3i3rO\6 \ m44\ 274 nis s,s 6a WELLINGTON 38 132 718— 79 1 \'7' fi�1371 � \ 911� 71 8\VE I— m/ 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 21© © ® 31'2�\471 FRUIT ST 13/Jm-9 6 43 0 \ \ 11 4 i SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT®PL":::..} 18+1�7: 19+2-- © /- 2/w m,^o 36\ /n/ —s \ J + 13J + 41 7® 10 11 ST 13 14 1s \ 107\ 22 }�/4TH 2� - 65� ^' 28� °' \ ,12� - < " / \ 148, " w / STATE FUN CCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 16 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CERTR CCESS RD - - 1©A +�7 ©/— T T 25/ no 1 \ 25 372\ 2 } r 5+ ^� 0+ 7 "2 i PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE O CABRILLO PARK DR 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT FIGURE 3-5 (to SCALE EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1617 10/3/2023 F / �r759\ 18 0 J 36 314 J + 12 J + 37 J + 5 J + 42 ST ' z5`' 854� �,� 859� 471� 553� n a \ � _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST 9 /— 10 /— 11 L 12+71�17 /mnw 15\ /895 \ / 935 \ / t 1075\ WELL NGTON J N58 f 741 44 / J + t 883 \ / J 601—`76 r 1225 } r 1 26 }71901 741— "' fi20� "' 752� "' "' 930Oq VE\\ / 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 17 1@3/ rn \ / \ +.4 +03t: FRUIT sT w 11Gs\ / 694 \ J 378 t 1163 584\ 142, SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CAR-- PARK DR 0 1,B25 --'7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD m PARK CT®'pL":::..i 18 /� 19+2� +\,�22:; /<aw L 53\4\/ 1206\J I 133 J+zzaaTH 7 ®9mn 47 as } r ST 1013� �,-, 27—�3 ,042r22 \ 110� "' '�" /77� / \ 36-1 / \` f/ \\ M/ \` / STATE FUN CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 t6 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENT - - T � T +7� 00322.110 4 20.088 © J i4954s,442s9� PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT FIGURE 3-6 (tO SCALE EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1618 10/3/2023 movements. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding ICU value range and are shown in Table 3-1. 3.4.2 Highway Capacity Manual 6 (HCM 6) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) Two-way stop -controlled intersections are comprised of a major street, which is uncontrolled, and a minor street, which is controlled by stop signs. Level of service for a two-way stop -controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay. The control delay by movement, by approach, and for the intersection as a whole is estimated by the computed capacity for each movement. LOS is determined for each minor -street movement (or shared movement) as well as major -street left turns. The worst side street approach delay is reported. LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole or for major -street approaches, as it is assumed that major -street through vehicles experience zero delay. The HCM control delay value range for two-way stop - controlled intersections is shown in Table 3-2. 3.4.3 Level of Service Criteria The need for potential Project -related improvements due to the added Project traffic volumes generated by the proposed Project during the AM and PM peak hours was evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Methodology and the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume -to -capacity relationships, delay, and service level characteristics at each key study intersection. Each key study intersection was then evaluated using the following LOS criteria. According to the City of Santa Ana, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the peak commute hours. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 10 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1619 10/3/2023 TABLE 3-1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (ICU METHODOLOGY) Level of Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization Value (V/C) Level of Service Description EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer A < 0.60 than one red light, and no approach phase is fully used. VERY GOOD. An occasional approach B 0.61 - 0.70 phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to C 0.71 - 0.80 wait through more than one red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough D 0.81 - 0.90 lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. POOR. Represents the most vehicles E 0.91 - 1.00 intersection approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent F > 1.00 movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Potentially very long delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nirfield Cahrilln Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Aeon',\4531 Cabrillo ToCenter Mixed-11— P—J— Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1620 10/3/2023 TABLE 3-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6 METHODOLOGY)' Level of Service (LOS) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Delay Per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service Description A < 10.0 Little or no delay B I > 10.0 and < 15.0 I Short traffic delays C I > 15.0 and < 25.0 I Average traffic delays D I > 25.0 and < 35.0 I Long traffic delays E I > 35.0 and < 50.0 I Very long traffic delays F > 50.0 Severe congestion Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 20: Two -Way Stop -Controlled Intersections. The LOS criteria apply to each lane on a given approach and to each approach on the minor street. LOS is not calculated for major -street approaches or for the intersection as a whole. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 12 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana vl f,„1M) )"915;1 1 iIrhekI ('. 'lk, I',o ('] ,. Sa A,' ), 1 1:i41 Cah-Ih V!,v"I i . F , „ .' . ",[ I I:, ti � .A;"n I I IS )112, lu: City Council 18 — 1621 10/3/2023 3.4.4 Existing Level of Service Results Table 3-3 summarizes the existing peak hour service level calculations for the twenty-five (25) key study intersections based on existing traffic volumes and current street geometrics. Review of Table 3-3 indicates that twenty-four (24) of the twenty-five key study intersections currently operate at an acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. Appendix D presents the ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculation worksheets for the twenty-five (25) key study intersections for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 13 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana 1,00-19LI I ''(Id( 'lIk,I. iI(,_nr,. Sa L'i)CahII, A11v"I ii F-dII,Ati ,.A;"e I 1 I S)[12,i'un. City Council 18 — 1622 10/3/2023 TABLE 3-3 EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Minimum Acceptable Control Time Key Intersection Jurisdiction LOS Type Period ICU/HCM LOS Elk Lane at 40 Traffic AM 0.607 B 1 Santa Ana D First Street Signal PM 0.727 C I-5 SB On Ramp at Santa Ana/ 2. First Street Caltrans Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 Cabrillo Park Drive at 60 Traffic AM 0.456 A 3 First Street Santa Ana D Signal PM 0.551 A Golden Circle Drive at 50 Traffic AM 0.337 A 4. Santa Ana D First Street Signal PM 0.332 A Tustin Avenue at 60 Traffic AM 0.351 A 5 Tustin D First Street Signal PM 0.374 A Yorba Street at 50 Traffic AM 0.404 A 6 Tustin D First Street Signal PM 0.484 A I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at Santa Ana/ 7. 4th street Caltrans Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 I-5 NB Ramps at Santa Ana/ 8. 4th Street Caltrans Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 Cabrillo Park Drive at 60 Traffic AM 0.559 A 9. Santa Ana D 4th Street Signal PM 0.723 C Golden Circle Drive at 50 Traffic AM 0.412 A 10. 4th Street Santa Ana D Signal PM 0.412 A Park Center Drive at One -Way AM 13.9 s/v B 11. 4th Street Santa Ana D Stop PM 16.5 s/v C Tustin Avenue at 80 Traffic AM 0.609 B 12. 4th Street Santa Ana D Signal PM 0.748 C SR-55 SB Ramps at Santa Ana/ 13. 4th Street Caltrans Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 SR-55 NB Ramps at Tustin/ 14. 4th Street Caltrans Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 Yorba Street at 60 Traffic AM 0.518 A 15. Tustin D 4th Street Signal PM 0.564 A LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 14 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nirfield Cabrillo Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Aeon',\4531 Cabrillo ToCenter Mixed-1 Ts P—j— Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1623 10/3/2023 TABLE 3-3 (CONTINUED) EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Minimum Acceptable Control Time Key Intersection Jurisdiction LOS Type Period ICU/HCM LOS Cabrillo Park Drive at 30 Traffic AM 0.312 A 16. Santa Ana D State Fund Access Road Signal PM 0.345 A Cabrillo Park Drive at 30 Traffic AM 0.274 A 17 Santa Ana D Xerox Centre Access Road Signal PM 0.312 A Cabrillo Park Drive at 50 Traffic AM 0.575 A 18. 17t'' Street Santa Ana D Signal PM 0.620 B Cabrillo Park Drive at Two -Way AM 18.1 s/v C 19. Wellington Avenue Santa Ana D Stop PM 18.3 s/v C Tustin Avenue at 50 Traffic AM 0.583 A 20. Santa Ana D Wellington Avenue Signal PM 0.416 A Mabury Street at All -Way AM 7.9 s/v A 21. Santa Ana D Fruit Street Stop PM 7.8 s/v A Cabrillo Park Drive at All -Way AM 13.9 s/v B 22. Santa Ana D Fruit Street Stop PM 12.3 s/v B Park Center Drive at Two -Way AM 10.3 s/v B 23. Fruit Street Santa Ana D Stop PM 10.5 s/v B Tustin Avenue at 20 Traffic AM 0.516 A 24 Santa Ana D Fruit Street Signal PM 0.452 A Cabrillo Park Drive at Two -Way AM 19.0 s/v C 25. Park Court Place Santa Ana D Stop PM 25.1 s/v D LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 15 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nirfield Ca";i n Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Aeon',\4531 Cabrillo ToCenter Mixed-1 Ts P—j— Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1624 10/3/2023 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the traffic impact characteristics of the proposed Project, a multi -step process has been utilized. The first step is traffic generation, which estimates the total arriving and departing traffic on a peak hour and daily basis. The traffic generation potential is forecast by applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the project development tabulation. The second step of the forecasting process is traffic distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/expected future travel patterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to study area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning movements throughout the study area. With the forecasting process complete and project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the proposed project is isolated by comparing operational (LOS) conditions at selected key intersections using expected future traffic volumes with and without forecast project traffic. The need for site - specific and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements can then be evaluated and the significance of the project's impacts identified. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 16 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1625 10/3/2023 5.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 5.1 Project Traffic Generation Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the I lth Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 20211. Table 5-1, ITE Land Use 710: General Office Building, ITE Land Use 215: Single Family Attached Housing, ITE Land Use 221: Multifamily Family Housing (Mid -Rise) and ITE Land Use 822: Strip Retail Plaza trip rates will be used to forecast the trip generation potential of the Existing Land Use and proposed Project, respectively. It is noted that for this preliminary assessment, it is assumed that the commercial component of the live -work units is to be occupied by office/commercial related uses, whereas the retail component is retail/shop space. For the Existing Land Use, a review of the middle portion of this table indicates that the existing office building generates 1,876 daily trips, with 263 trips (231 inbound, 32 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 249 trips (42 inbound, 207 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a "typical" weekday. The lower half of Table 5-1 indicates that the proposed Project, after application of a 5% internal capture rate, is forecast to generate 2,751 daily trips, with 213 trips (66 inbound, 147 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 249 trips (141 inbound, 108 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a "typical" weekday. A comparison of the proposed Project's trip generation to that of the Existing Land Use indicates that the Project will result in 875 more daily trips, 50 fewer AM peak hour trips and 0 more PM peak hour trips. 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment Figure 5-1 presents the traffic distribution pattern for the existing office building. Figure 5-2 presents the traffic distribution pattern for the proposed Project. A tabular summary of the general directional Project trip distribution pattern is presented Table 5-2. Project traffic volumes both entering and exiting the project site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: ■ location of site access points in relation to the surrounding street system, ■ the site's proximity to major traffic carriers and regional access routes, ■ physical characteristics of the circulation system such as lane channelization and presence of traffic signals that affect travel patterns, ■ presence of traffic congestion in the surrounding vicinity, ■ ingress/egress availability at the project site, as well as turn restrictions at adjacent intersections, LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 17 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N('enter Mixed -lice Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1626 10/3/2023 ■ distribution patterns contained within the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana, and ■ input from City staff. The anticipated AM and PM peak hour project traffic volumes associated with the removal of the existing office building are presented in Figures 5-3 and 5-4, respectively. Figure 5-4 also presents the daily Project traffic volumes. The traffic volume assignments presented in Figures 5-3 and 5-4 reflect the traffic distribution characteristics shown in Figure 5-1 and the traffic generation forecast presented in Table 5-1. The anticipated AM and PM peak hour project traffic volumes associated with the proposed Project are presented in Figures 5-5 and 5-6, respectively. Figure 5-6 also presents the daily Project traffic volumes. The traffic volume assignments presented in Figures 5-5 and 5-6 reflect the traffic distribution characteristics shown in Figure 5-2and the traffic generation forecast presented in Table 5-1. Figures 5-7 and 5-8 present the net trips for the AM and PM peak after combining the proposed Project with that from the trip credit applied for the existing office building. For the purpose of this study, the volumes noted in Figures 5-7 and 5-8 are used when referring to "Plus Project" conditions. 5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions The Existing Plus Project traffic conditions have been generated based upon existing conditions and the estimated project traffic. These forecast traffic conditions have been prepared to assess the potential impacts of the Project upon the circulation system as it currently exists per the requirements of the City, inclusive of queuing assessment to confirm adequacy of left -turn storage the study intersections. This traffic volume scenario and the related intersection capacity analyses will identify the roadway improvements necessary to off -set the direct traffic impacts of the Project, if any. Figures 5-9 and 5-10 present projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the twenty-five (25) key study intersections and Project driveways with the addition of the trips generated by the proposed Project to existing traffic volumes, respectively. Figure 5-10 also presents the Existing Plus Project daily traffic volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 18 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1627 10/3/2023 TABLE 5-1 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES AND FORECAST2 Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Description 2-Way Trip Rates: • 215: Single Family Attached Housing 7.20 31% 69% 0.48 57% 43% 0.57 (TE/DU) • 221: Multifamily Housing - Mid -Rise 4.54 23% 77% 0.37 61% 39% 0.39 (TE/DU) • 710: General Office Building 10.84 88 /0 o 12 /� 1.52 0 17 /0 0 83 /0 1.44 (TE/1000 SF) • 822: Strip Retail Plaza (< 40k) (TE/1000 SF) 54.45 60% 40% 2.36 50% 50% 6.59 Existin-a Land Use Trip Generation: • Cabrillo Park Drive and E. Fourth Office Buildings (173,025 SF) 1,876 231 32 263 42 207 249 Project Trip Generation: • Cabrillo Town Center Apartments (449 DU) 2,038 38 128 166 107 68 175 • Cabrillo Town Center Retail (5,800 SF) 316 8 6 14 19 19 38 • Cabrillo Town Center L/W Commercial (11,400 SF) 124 15 2 17 3 13 16 • Cabrillo Town Center Townhomes (58 DU) 418 9 19 28 19 14 33 Total Project Trip Generation: 2,896 70 155 225 148 114 262 Internal Trip Capture (5%) -145 -4 -8 -12 -7 -6 -13 Adjusted Project Trip Generation 2,751 66 147 213 141 108 249 Proposed Project vs. Existing Land Use Trip Generation Comparison +875 -165 +115 -50 +99 -99 0 Notes: TE/1000 SF = Trip End per 1,000 Square Feet of Gross Floor Area TE/DU = Trip End per Dwelling Unit Source: Trip Generation, I I" Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2021) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 19 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana I I', h, l'l( .irll In I", I, \ "11� -, 1 �:il (; .11h, MI — I I ,,.F , ,v I., , 1u0 I1\ ti . \i,;' I IF 10 City Council 18 — 1628 10/3/2023 TABLE 5-2 PROJECT DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PATTERN Distribution Percentage Orientation/Direction 15% To/from the north via I-5 Freeway 17% To/from the south via I-5 Freeway 10% To/from the north via SR-55 Freeway 10% To/from the south via SR-55 Freeway 6% To/from the north via Cabrillo Park Drive 4% To/from the north via Parkcourt Place/Marbury Street 5% To/from the north via Tustin Avenue 3% To/from the south via Elk Avenue 10% To/from the east via Fourth Street/Irvine Boulevard 10% To/from the west via Fourth Street 5% To/from the east via First Street 5% To/from the west via First Street 100% Total LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 20 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 - Fa. . IA Cahrilln Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Rannrt\4531 Cabrillo Tnwn Center Mixed -Ilse Pmiect Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1629 10/3/2023 711 s% 17TH 16 5%— ST \ I \ I 10R I \ I \ I \ I ELK LN 0 1-5 SIB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR ® TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST O Q 5R % o-3s\% WELLINGTON 5%_ 20%— 43%— 6%,0\ AV / \ I 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 15 16 13 /�— 14 /' /— /17'— /'— 18 /— / \\ / \\ / \\ / Im \\ / Im \\ FRUIT 21 © © ST ® / o-20R \ \ 25%— 49-� \ -T, / \taz� ce / \ / \ SR-55 SB RAMPS 9 SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR —.-,� 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD 17TH ST RK CTFL,'; ,',;I 19 /' ©0 /' 21 ©+21— \41TH@ sr i© 114 15 \ I \ I \ I \ f I o 57O STATE FUN CCE55 RD `� CABRILLO PARK DR 11 TUSTIN AVE 11 MABURY ST 11 CABRILLO PARK DR 11 PARK CENTER DR 0 _ 16 WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST FRUIT ST - EROx CENTR CCE55 RD - - PC. / ce \ t0� 0 �ioz%\/zzz2%j / \ \43%� I 43%_ �S$ TUSTIN AVE ® CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT EXISTING OFFICE DWY NO. 1 DAY NO. 2 0 DWY NO. 3 4TH ST 4TH ST KEY FIGURE 5-1 ® =STUDY INTERSECTION -INBOUND PERCENTAGE = OUTBOUND PERCENTAGE N NO SCALE = PROJECT SITE EXISTING OFFICE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1630 10/3/2023 / `3% -5% nTH ST sR— 5%— \I R <+__7 3R ELK LN ® 1-5 SIB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR ® TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST 10 /'— 11 /'— 1© 19 1 1-149. \ / 24R WELLINGTON 10%— 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 PARK CENTER DR ® TUSTIN AVE MABURY ST C 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 21© © ® 14 \ \ 5'—\ \ 16 \ \ 7 \ \ e2 FRUIT ST —20R \41TH(�) SR-55 SB RAMPS 0 SR-55 NB RAMPS ® YORBA ST 0 CAGRILLO PARK DR ®4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RDCTaL ,,� 16 /' 19 /' 0 /� 21® ye A11 1D%ftEROX TE FUN CCESS RD 16 CABRILLO PARK DR ® CABRILLO PARK DR ® TUSTIN AVE ® MABURV ST ® CABRILLO PARK DR 11 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST CEN1R CCESS RD - - FIRST ST / \ / n \\ / an° i2R\ 57. 0 A o—s% \ / d \ / b b `sR \ / b: �3a% �ziz \ 27R� , 1%b I 10%� 3%� \\ q 1 1\21%b / o � z ' �$ PARK CENTER DR ® TUSTIN AVE ® CABRILLO PARK DR ® CABRILLO PARK DR ® PROJECT DWY N0. 2 n FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST KEY FIGURE 5-2 ® =STUDY INTERSECTION -INBOUND PERCENTAGE = OUTBOUND PERCENTAGE N NO SCALE = PROJECT SITE PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN —0 CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1631 10/3/2023 0 0 0 ® o �23 000000/ -33 \ / o-0 \ / f-7 \ / --7 \ / o.-12\ 0 _5 �} 0 iIo 0 i} 0+0 0 18 \ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST / -2 \ / L _5 \ / -3 \ / -99\ / o 0 io t 0 i -99 io F 0 _ 19 WELLINGTON \ _10y / -81 } (' I \ 0 } r \' 0-7 \ } / o _-'211� _ AVF zo 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 INS RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 9 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 N' \ 14 /' 15 /'—\ 16 /' 17 0\ FRUIT 21 © IT ® -46\ / o \ / — -z3\ / \ / \ / — o \ -5 i 0 SR-55 SIB RAMPS ® SR-55 NB RAMPS ® YORBA ST ® ATE FUND PARK DR ® CABRILLO PARK DR I CABRIL11 PARK DR 4TH ST 4TH Si 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD 17TH ST m ARK CT®'L• ::.;•� 19 /' \ ©0 /' \ 21 /' © /' \ © /' \ LO\ X. 4TM 7 O8 9'; ® 10 11 1© 13 14 15 r I \ 0 } \ 0 } \ 0 } - ST 0� 0� o py o py o w _iy o ftE_XTE FUN CCESS RD CAERILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 PARK CENTER DR 0 u 16 WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST FRUIT ST CER CCESS RD -FIRST ST -1\ 02. -14— \ -14— a 01 TUSTINAVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR ® CABRILLO PARK DR ® EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT EXISTING OFFICE DWY NO. 1 DWY NO. 2 ® DWY NO. 3 4TH ST 4TH ST FIGURE 5-3 (No SCALE EXISTING OFFICE AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1632 10/3/2023 0 0 0 ® o -21\ / f-31 21\ �0 - ST \\ o` _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST 11 /'— 12 Lp\ 0 / Colo\t-41\ 19 WELLINGTON J 2� 0 r -15 } \\ 01\\_80 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR ® PARK CENTER DR ® TUSTIN AVE MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 -'—� 14 /' 15 /' \ 16 /— 17 FRUIT 21 © © ST ® / Jo 8\ / �0 \ /J+o 4\ 0 4 0 i \ } \ 0 } \ 0 } \ 0 } r \ _p� o / 0� o / \ 2� moe/ i SR-55 SB RAMPS 0 SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR ® CABRILLO PARK DR -19 —.—'7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RO 17TH ST "'--PARK CT +o�O+o�O \ ®D D -1 D i 4TH 7 n sT tQ 13 to is \ o \ } r l \ o } r py o py o py o py o -4y o00 AITA 1,041///00CESSRD I CABRILLO PARK DR ® TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST ® CABRILLO PARK DR ® PARK CENTER DR ®WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT STFRUIT ST FRUIT STSS RO - ®+4� ®®/®56 q -56 ©/t /\/A}}i-89— -99— _ i TUSTIN AVE ® CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT EXISTING OFFICE DWY NO. 1 DWY NO. 2 0 DWY NO. 3 4TH ST 4TH ST FIGURE 5-4 0 (I)No SCALE EXISTING OFFICE PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1633 10/3/2023 F /J iNr7- 18 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 \ 3y _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST O9 /' 10 /' 11 / o t 15 \ / 22 \ / - — 46 \ / oo — 20 \ / o 0 \ / — 14 \ e O 21 2C o f 35 J+ 34 J+o 0 J rJ+ -5 19 WELLINGTON 0 — -,5 } r o 15/ \\ py <nn/ o AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 1 /' \ 14 FRUIT 21 ST 0 20 0/ i SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT®'pL )Q7 ® 9 :':::� m (DST @ 13 to ® STATE FUN CCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 t6 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENTR CCESS RD - - 1©A — — -- -F.:T ~ T /oo gyp\ /no gyp\ / L3\ / N \ / \ 1 2 3 4 2 0 J�� o J1� o J+ 13 +asp J —13 rI \ }r I \ 28— N 2,/o PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE O CABRILLO PARK DR O CABRILLO PARK OR O PROJECT OWY N0. 2 O FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 5-5 (to SCALE AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1634 10/3/2023 - 18 ST _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST O9 /' 10 /' 11 �18 Oto n is — z6 J +^ 2s J +o p WELLINGTON J14— / O r 0 \\ 0-,/ \\ 35y ory AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 /' \ 14 /' \ 15 /' \ 16 /' — 17 \\ 21 © © ST / o FRUIT -ti 0 l 3 \ 211; SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 111 --'7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RDy PARK CT®'pL ":::..i Lp\ /o O\\ Lp\ /o Lp\ /J+ono \ /J +ot 0 \ /J +o�O \ /J +o�O \ /J +o�7 \ u )4TH 7 ® 9:.Y@- n sT� 13 to 1s \ o°--�r� 1 pyo}�l \ �o}�l \ pyo}�l \ oyo}�l o A 1.464 CESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C SS RD - T /gyp\83 4 A 83 \ o }� 1 s }�� \ }r� \ }r \ 40— \ zo / \ 4 PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 PROJECT DWY NO. 2 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST lk FIGURE 5-6 (to SCALE PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1635 10/3/2023 +Tl-t'i—1 ` 4 _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST 12 p \ / o t 13 \ / 17 \ / — 43 \ / oo — -79\ / o 0 \ / — -62\ o O21 f 33 J+ Z8 J+ 0 0 J -79 J+ N 0 19 WELLINGTON 0 \\ 01 / \\-30—on 1- / o AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 15 /— \ 16 --- 17 /'— 12 / 0\ \\ / \\ •- FRUIT 21 © © ST ® / J o -17\ RO t-17 1 �0 3 21� 0 / � \ 12� \ 12� _ \ 12� o�b \ p� on \ p, on j \ / SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT®'pL":::..i 18 /� +�2 /o L p\®' :::1 /J+�—oz\ /JI�o \ /J+�a \ /J+—o \ aTH 7 9::::m n sT 13\ o°—o�rp®\ -B� / STATE FUN CCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 t6 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENTR CCESS RD - - 1©A — +12:/ ;T T /o0 1`p\ +2, \®A /Ji��oz\ \/i3\ 39y o }}i28—\ 0� / PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE O CABRILLO PARK DR O CABRILLO PARK OR O PROJECT OWY N0. 2 O FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 5-7 (to SCALE AM PEAK HOUR NET PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1636 10/3/2023 / o -16\- ts Sr _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST 0 15 27 f 16 J+ -1fi J+ o D J r J+ N 0 19 WELLINGTON J 1/ 0 r I 14 } r 29 } / p \\ 012� _78.— AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 LUST AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST FRUIT 21 © © sT SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 411 ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RDy PARK CT® ' PIT ... ® fi O D D 6 3 4TH 7 Q f 9:::::. o t1 sT @ 13 14 ASTA 423 CESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 07TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT STSS RDTp27 4 275 6 / rfi—Q Q 0 J} o J 1 D J i n 1 az J f zs \ 0 }� I }�l \ }rl \ }r I \ 40— \ 25— o / \ 242o ` / \ 4� n n t2 PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 PROJECT DWY NO. 2 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 5-8 (to SCALE PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY NET PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1637 10/3/2023 158\ 62 ,� 21�` 100 F /J 482\ ST _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST Is+38 /— /Nea L 57\\ /m555652 \ / + t 613 \ / — 570 / 86sa J i s7J+ Ba695 J i 117WELL NGTON712� 104 } 1 28 } 791371/\\278y mn�/4�91z� 7D2VE \D / 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 32\ / mm \\ / opN \\ •- FRUIT 21 © © ST ® / f 1067\ / 752 \ / `V r 1454\ J N 459 t 1120 J+ 13 J+ V m J \ s36— r� I A \tn1s1 / \ aoo— / \ sp� ^ ; / \ 61 / \ 41 SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT®PL 7 13 4TH O n } 33_6s12333 zz 9\\ 714 z3\ ® STATE FUN ACCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 t6 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENTR CCESS RD - - 1©A — -- T ~ T /Yoo 1` g\ /a. ___ 25\ +_�: 01 O425 5 } r 781037—+ a 74� \ �' \\ \_ n PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR O CABRILLO PARK OR O PROJECT OWY N0. 2 O FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PITPROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 5-9 (to SCALE EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1638 10/3/2023 iS9 60 N 40Si` 199 F / r 743 ST ` 1624` f 854� 856� 468� 548� a _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST 9/2�0 �} 3863 75773 97 19 WELLINGTON 44�7 613— 77s r 79087 52_ VE Nunj 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 21© 17 IT zs\ FRUIT 38 85� 813\ — } \I 3 14 142, SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CAR-- PARK DR 0 1,936 --'7 4TH ST 4TH ST 411 ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RDy PARK cT® 18+47 19+2� /� � 21+22: ©+27:;�7 ,N�°' 14\ ®J + 294TH7 9 ... 1C 11 Q 13 14 15 1 49 } i I 0-- 3 ,645r2O \ 77� < ^ / \\ / STATE FUN CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 16 a 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENTw - - 3 T ~ T O1� 2 22,137 q, 20,115 O w 49 + 11 I + 37 J f 1235 6,376 0 } r I \ 11 } I 6 } r I } r I 873— I `� 103+ n 6+ o n }+ oo n i PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 PROJECT DWY NO. 2 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 5-10 (to SCALE EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1639 10/3/2023 6.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 6.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Horizon year, background traffic growth estimates have been calculated using an ambient traffic growth factor. The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown and future related projects in the study area, as well as account for regular growth in traffic volumes due to the development of projects outside the study area. The future growth in traffic volumes has been calculated at one percent (1.0%) per year. Applied to the Year 2022 existing baseline conditions, this factor results in a 4.0% growth in existing volumes to the near -term horizon year 2026. 6.2 Related Projects Traffic Characteristics In order to make a realistic estimate of future on -street conditions prior to implementation of the proposed Project, the status of other known development projects (related projects) within a two- mile radius of the proposed project has been researched at the Cities of Santa Ana, Tustin and Orange. With this information, the potential impact of the proposed Project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. Based on our research during the scoping process, there are twenty-eight (28) related projects located in the City of Santa Ana, eight (8) related projects located in the City of Tustin and one (1) related project located in the City of Orange. These thirty-seven (37) related projects have been included as part of the cumulative background setting. Table 6-1 provides a brief description for each of the thirty-seven (37) related projects. Figure 6-1 graphically illustrates the location of the thirty-seven (37) related projects. These related projects are expected to generate vehicular traffic, which may affect the operating conditions of the key study intersections. Table 6-2 summarizes the trip generation potential for all thirty-seven (37) related projects on a daily and peak hour basis for a typical weekday. As shown, the related projects are expected to generate 50,043 daily trips, with 3,338 trips (1,378 inbound, 1,960 outbound) anticipated during the AM peak hour and 4,098 trips (2,266 inbound, 1,832 outbound) produced during the PM peak hour. The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes associated with the thirty-seven (37) related projects in the Year 2026 are presented in Figures 6-2 and 6-3, respectively. Figure 6-3 also presents the daily related project traffic volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 21 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1640 10/3/2023 KEY w of v s� N•u 1. MCDONALDS RESTAURANT 'm4 Smile Direct Club 2. SCHOLARSHIP PREP SCHOOL 3. CHUZE FITNESS SHOPPING CENTER 4. BAJA FISH TACOS Discovery Cub@ 5. TUSTIN SERVICE STATION AND CAR WASH 1' Orange County 6. FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANKi 7. ONE BROADWAY PLAZA °�i'ri ° 8. INNOVATIVE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES F g MIXED -USE (NORTH) rerS Museum Ilp t 9. INNOVATIVE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES rt North Tustin 1. MIXED -USE (SOUTH) n 10. CENTRAL POINTE © 3 2 ® 31 = v 11. THE CROSSROADS AT WASHINGTON s 12. AMAZON DISTRIBUTION FACILITY 13. LEGACY SQUARE MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT } 14. SYCAMORE CONDOTEL 15. 3RD & BROADWAY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 16. 4TH & MORTIMER MIXED USE. DEVELOPMENT 17. FIRST AMERICAN PLAZA ® 18. THE SOUND CHANGE OF USE 13r6l 12 1019. LACY CROSSING mArBira 1419 211. AMG EA20. THE ST RST APARTMENTS/1ST POINT ONE n im � Sa 15�17 f1 © ©� 5 2 8 3 33 36 22. 1660 FIRST STREET ELKS APARTMENTS 26 23. REXFORD INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 24. RUSSELL/FISHER COMMERCIAL CENTER = Tustil 3 25. 2020 E. FIRST STREET MIXED -USE PROJECT wHslapst fir: $ppntgF 26. METRO EAST SENIOR PARK - _� 27. FIRST STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS 9 o 28. 2202 E. FIRST STREET RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 35 cs 29. ALDI 30 v 30. BRASS MONKEY/OCULTO 31. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 55 4, r � 32. EAT FANTASTIC 33. RALLY'S BURGERS . 34. ACADIA HEALTHCARE 35. THE HILL The Market Place - 36. 99 RANCH MARKET 37. GRACE CHURCH - i 3 e (NO SCALE SOURCE: GOGGLE KEY �r®' = CUMULATIVE PROJECTS LOCATION L••; = PROJECT SITE LOCATION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA FIGURE 6-1 City Council 18 - 1641 10/3/2023 �74 61 \ / ~ioz\ / J/Ji �z13\ /J� \ /J+�r\ o ST 90y / _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST O / t 189 \ / 122 \ / t 180 \ / t 199 \ / 0 19 WELLINGTON J + 40 145 f 227 J + n 15 J + -36 J r J + 0 39 1101 2s0— AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 21© A ® 10z FRUIT © sr J0 /\ �60 0+ } \ i 44, SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT® PIT ":::...� 18+21 /oJ4aTH 7 ® 9'::::mnsT 13 pyooyoo STATE FUN CCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 16 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CERTR CCESS RD - - F.;T T +7�: l 2 \ Oy o-o/ PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE O CABRILLO PARK DR 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT FIGURE 6-2 (to SCALE AM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRI LLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1642 10/3/2023 - F / J+`"r67 J }"t J+"tzs3\ / J+ J for 128 80 \ 18 0 59 0 1 3 0 132� o b 280� 0 7fi� `ry88� _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST 12 71 \ / — 192 \ / oo — 229 \ / 0 \ / — 279 \ n O 41 f 209 J+ 18 J+ 0 J r 251 J+ 127 19 WELL NGTON J241— 18 r 86 } r 40 } 0 11 } r o \ 0, \ 348— "' \ 233— "�,'�,�'� \ 2fi1— o < \ 265— AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 /' 14 /' \ 15 /' 16 / m — 17 / iw \\ FRUIT 21 © © ST ® / f 273\ / 20 \ / oo r 207\ J 20 t 187 J 0 0 J} J} } \ 216� \ B (' \ ° o��' \ 0 } \ 40 } 3 A \ 73, / \ 146� / 16 / \ 29, SR-55 SB RAMPS 0 SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 1,978 --'7 �' 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RDy PARK CT@ -PL 18+242 / —o,87 °7.10 11 ST 13 14aTH .:.. STATE FUN CCES S RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 16 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROx CENTR CCESS RD o - - T T +7.- 2Q6.729 4 6�236 O5,433 i PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT FIGURE 6-3 (to SCALE PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRI LLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1643 10/3/2023 TABLE 6-1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS' No. Cumulative Project Location/Address Description City of Santa Ana 1. McDonalds Restaurant 2101-2109 East Santa Clara Avenue 3,987 SF fast-food restaurant with drive-thru Construction of 17,532 SF charter school with 425 students (TK-4 Grade) 2. Scholarship Prep School 1821 North Grand Ave 3. Chuze Fitness Shopping Center 1900 North Grand Ave 109,276 SF gymnasium 4. Baja Fish Tacos 2107 East 17'j' Street 5,005 SF restaurant 5 Tustin Service Station and Car Wash 2230 North Tustin Avenue 2,150 SF gas station with 12 VFP 6. Farmers & Merchants Bank 1702 North Main Street Construction of 6,233 SF bank 415 DU residential apartments, 3,200 SF 7. One Broadway Plaza 1109 North Broadway restaurant, and 200,000 SF office/commercial 8' Innovative Housing Opportunities 601 North Golden Circle Drive Demolition of existing 21,586 SF office and Mixed -Use (North) construction of 80 DU apartments Innovative Housing Opportunities Demolition of existing 20,400 SF office and 9. Mixed -Use (South) 2021 East Fourth Street construction of 80 DU apartments and 15,000 SF commercial 10. Central Pointe 1801 East 4d' Street 644 DU residential apartments, 11,700 SF retail, and 3,500 SF restaurant 11. The Crossroads at Washington 1126 East Washington Avenue 86 DU residential apartments Demolition of existing 120,000 SF 12. Amazon Distribution Facility 511 North Grand Avenue production/distribution facility and construction of 112,485 SF 609 North Spurgeon Street warehouse/distribution facility 13. Legacy Square Mixed -Use 93 DU residential apartments and 2,722 SF Development commercial Converting existing 34,903 SF office to a 14. Sycamore Condotel 515 North Sycamore Street 60 room hotel 15. 3rd & Broadway Mixed Use 201 West 3rd Street 171 DU residential apartments, 13,419 SF Development commercial, and 75 room hotel Notes: • SF = Square -feet • DU = Dwelling units • VFP = Vehicle Fueling Positions ' Source: City of Santa Ana, Citv of Tustin, and City of Orange Planning Department LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 22 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 -Fairfield Cahrilln Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Rennrt\4531 Cabrillo Tnwn Center Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1644 10/3/2023 TABLE 6-1 (CONTINUED) LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS' No. Cumulative Project Location/Address Description City of Santa Ana (continued) Demolition of existing 14,080 SF 16. 4m & Mortimer Mixed Use 409 & 509 East 41n Street supermarket and construction of 169 DU Development apartments, 7,514 SF retail shops, and 3,847 SF restaurant 17. First American Plaza 421 North Main Street /114 East 220 DU multifamily (mid -rise) and 12,350 SF 51n Street retail 18. The Sound Change of Use 400 East 4t' Street Convert existing 29,550 SF office to commercial/office/religious facility 19. Lacy Crossing 1008 East 41n Street 117 DU single-family residences 20. The Madison 200 North Cabrillo Park Drive 260 DU live/work apartments with 2,507 SF commercial, and 6,561 SF retail 21 AMG East First Apartments/1st 2114 East 1st Street 552 DU apartments and 10,000 SF Point One commercial 22. 1660 First Street Elks Apartments 1660 East 1st Street 603 DU apartments and 8,900 SF commercial 23. Rexford Industrial Building 600 South Grand Avenue 138,980 SF industrial 24. Russell/Fisher Commercial Center 301 North Tustin Avenue 7,368 SF commercial 2020 E. First Street Mixed -Use Demolition of existing 110,489 SF office and 25. Project 2020 East 1st Street construction of 86 DU multi -family residential and 2,885 SF commercial 26. Metro East Senior Park 2222 East 1st Street 418 DU senior residential apartments 27. First Street Family Apartments 1440 East 1st Street 69 DU residential apartments, 47,040 SF existing office demolition 28 2202 E. First Street Residential 2202 East 1st Street 181 DU residential apartments and 3,000 SF Project commercial City of Tustin 29. Aldi 1091 Old Irvine Boulevard 18,996 SF commercial building with grocery store 30. Brass Monkey/Oculto 14401 Newport Avenue 3,167 SF restaurant 31. Medical Office Building 17631 17" Street 11,323 SF medical offices Notes: • SF = Square -feet • DU = Dwelling units 4 Source: City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin, and City of Orange Planning Department LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 23 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana 1,00 —19L I I '',hli ,-Ilk, I ,,. (,_n r,. Sa L'il Cah II, A11 d iI . F -d I I,A ti ,.ling I IS City Council 18 — 1645 10/3/2023 TABLE 6-1 (CONTINUED) LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS' No. Cumulative Project Location/Address Description City of Tustin (Continued) 32. Eat Fantastic 171 East Is' Street 2,958 SF fast -casual restaurant with a drive- thru 33. Rally's Burgers 14982 Prospect Avenue 972 SF fast-food restaurant with a drive-thru 34. Acadia Healthcare 535 East 1st Street, Unit 200 10,610 SF medical office 35. The Hill 13751 and 13841 Red Hill 137 DU multi -family residential and 7,000 SF Avenue commercial 36. 99 Ranch Market 500 East Is' Street 30,000 SF commercial building with grocery store City of Orange 37. Grace Church 2201 Fairhaven Avenue 8,663 SF sports complex Notes: • SF = Square -feet • DU = Dwelling units ' Source: City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin, and City of Orange Planning Departments. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 24 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana „1,00 i d "d I I' � ,.v;,,� n 1S �nz_','„n City Council 18 — 1646 10/3/2023 TABLE 6-2 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST' Cumulative Project Description Daily 2-Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total 1. McDonalds Restaurant 1,398 45 44 89 31 28 59 2. Scholarship Prep School 786 230 212 442 24 44 68 3. Chuze Fitness Shopping Center 3,770 73 70 143 215 162 377 4. Baja Fish Tacos 437 4 2 6 20 16 36 5. Tustin Service Station and Car Wash 1,548 23 23 46 36 36 72 6. Farmers & Merchants Bank 760 -7 -7 -7 33 43 76 7. One Broadway Plaza 5,274 323 175 498 193 324 517 8 Innovative Housing Opportunities Mixed- Use (North) 305 -21 20 -1 21 -11 10 9 Innovative Housing Opportunities Mixed- Use (South) 1,053 0 32 32 51 20 71 10. Central Pointe8 4,121 82 182 264 205 139 344 11. The Crossroads at Washington 580 8 26 34 28 16 44 12. Amazon Distribution Facility 192 15 4 19 6 14 20 13. Legacy Square Mixed -Use Development 760 13 29 42 35 23 58 14. Sycamore Condotel 479 16 12 28 18 17 35 15. 3rd & Broadway Mixed Use Development 2,410 53 79 132 103 81 184 16. 41 & Mortimer Mixed Use Developments -173 6 38 44 19 -4 15 17. First American Plaza to 1,420 26 59 85 70 1 52 122 18. The Sound Change of Use 1,448 38 25 63 59 58 117 19. Lacy Crossing 1,103 21 61 82 69 41 110 20. The Madison1l 2,010 30 104 134 115 69 184 21. AMG East First Apartments/ls' Point One 4,210 66 177 243 198 124 322 22. 1660 First Street Elks Apartments" 4,648 70 242 312 266 162 428 23. Rexford Industrial Building 677 91 12 103 13 77 90 Unless otherwise noted, Source: Trip Generation, l It' Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2021). It is assumed that the bank is closed during the morning peak traffic hours. 8 Source: Cabrillo Town Center Project (Central Pointe) TIA, prepared by LLG, dated July 2020 9 Source: 41 and Mortimer Project TIA, prepared by LLG, dated July 2020. 10 Source: First American Plaza 4`s & Main Apartments TIA, prepared by LLG, dated April 2019. 11 Source: The Madison Mixed -Use Development TIA, prepared by LLG, dated August 2017. 12 Source: 1660 E. First Street Elks Apartments TIA, prepared by LLG, dated June 2018. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 25 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nennrt\4531 Cabrillo Tnwn Center Mixed-11— Proi— Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1647 10/3/2023 TABLE 6-2 (CONTINUED) CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST13 Cumulative Project Description Daily 2-Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total 24. Russell/Fisher Commercial Center 361 9 6 15 15 14 29 25. 2020 E. First Street Mixed -Use Projects' -461 -132 10 -122 9 -103 -94 26. Metro East Senior Park15 1,354 29 55 84 59 46 105 27. First Street Family Apartments16 459 7 28 35 28 15 43 28. 2202 E. First Street Residential Project 969 19 54 73 49 34 83 29. Aldi 1,605 29 20 49 65 64 129 30. Brass Monkey/Oculto 306 15 12 27 10 7 17 31. Medical Office Building 408 28 7 35 13 31 44 32. Eat Fantastic 1,037 33 33 66 23 21 44 33. Rally's Burgers 340 11 10 21 8 6 14 34. Acadia Healthcare 382 26 7 33 13 29 42 35. The Hill 1,266 22 48 70 58 40 98 36. 99 Ranch Market 2,551 59 36 95 78 85 163 37. Grace Church 250 11 6 17 10 12 22 Cumulative Projects Total Trip Generation Potential 50,043 1,378 1,960 3,338 2,266 1,832 4,098 13 Unless otherwise noted, Source: Trip Generation, I Ith Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2021). 14 Source: The 2020 E. First Street Mired -Use Project Traffic Study, prepared by LLG, dated July 2022. 15 Although this Project is considered to be built under existing conditions, as a conservative measure it has been included within the cumulative background traffic conditions due to the use of historic Year 2019 traffic count data. 16 Source: First Street Family Apartments TIA, prepared by LLC, dated January 2016. Although this Project is considered to be built under existing conditions, as a conservative measure it has been included within the cumulative background traffic conditions due to the use of existing historic Year 2019 traffic count data. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 26 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nennrt\4531 Cabrillo Tnwn Center Mixed-11— Proi— Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1648 10/3/2023 6.3 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions As coordinated with City staff, the Year 2045 traffic volume forecasts for this traffic study were development via the utilization of the OCTAM 5.0 Year 2045 traffic model provided by OCTA. Specifically, daily, AM peak period and PM peak period link traffic volumes were provided by OCTA for the existing base year (i.e. Year 2016) and for the Year 2045 year. The AM peak period corresponds to a three-hour morning commute period while the PM peak period corresponds to a four-hour afternoon commute period. Using the peak period model runs and the OCTA approved peak hour factors (i.e. AM = 0.3566 and PM = 0.2662), the one -hour peak hour link traffic volumes were determined. These future year 2045 link traffic volumes were post -processed based on the relationship of the base year validation model run output to the base year ground traffic counts resulting in Year 2045 without project daily traffic volumes for the AM peak hour/PM peak hour turning movements for the key study intersections. Copies of the model post -processing worksheets are contained in Appendix C. 6.4 Year 2026 and Year 2045 Traffic Volumes 6.4.1 Year 2026 Traffic Volumes Figures 6-4 and 6-5 present the AM and PM peak hour cumulative traffic volumes (existing traffic + ambient growth + related projects) at twenty-five (25) key study intersections for the Year 2026, respectively. Figure 6-5 also presents the Year 2026 daily cumulative traffic volumes. Figures 6-6 and 6-7illustrate the Year 2026 forecast AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, with the inclusion of the trips generated by the proposed Project, respectively. Figure 6-7also presents the Year 2026 cumulative plus project daily traffic volumes. 6.4.2 Year 2045 Traffic Volumes Figures 6-8 and 6-9 present the Year 2045 AM and PM peak hour cumulative traffic volumes at the twenty-five (25) key study intersections, respectively. Figure 6-9 also presents the Year 2045 daily cumulative traffic volumes. Figures 6-10 and 6-11 illustrate the Year 2045 forecast AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, with the inclusion of the trips generated by the proposed Project, respectively. Figure 6-11 also presents the Year 2045 buildout plus project daily traffic volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 27 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1649 10/3/2023 104 - F 810 \ / 9s4 \ / t 1022\ / t 1192\ / ' f 713 \ / - ` r 765 \ 18 o J 84 435 J + 24 J + 50 J + 2 J + 51 Sr _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST Is /'—� 7/1 12/ \854/ 594 \ t773 / — 874 / 89\/WELL NGTON a1 f 7s7 J + 87 J + 155 J r950 866—` 43 r142, 1141� "'AVE_\, "/ 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 33, FRUIT 21 © © ST ® +J4 ,4 794� 48, SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT 18+14 19 /' /,,,' 21 /'—\ © /'/"nn L 34\ /om- 2\ /wen L it\ /wao L 37\ / —o \--1\ / w —1s \ / w —n \J i" z6+14 J I Y 5 J I 47 4TH 7 9 101115` 2 } i, }` 23 } /ST 2— '� 2� '� 68� " z9� o \ 5, p/ \ 32," / \154: n/ STATE FUN CCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 16 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST C:C ROX 0. CESS RD - - T T /Yoo 1` 6\ O ®A © /J r58 \ l J 48 26 3 5 } r ggy < n 4: \ 37, w / \ 44, PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT FIGURE 6-4 (to SCALE YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1650 10/3/2023 83- F /� �83 7\ / 386\ / J+ t 829\ /J+ot 799\ /i �Bp\ /i+ �44\ o is }e25' t' I ' / I 4n } r 7 } a7z / 3 } I ST 66 1020� W "� 7173� N S6fi� c+,V 663� 36__j / _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST ��� f08 24\ / \ +133�,_ 1043\ / t 1310\WELL NGTON 'p' 980i +^ 64/t8851\/1240866� 97 r 1 32 } r 1 67 } '_ ` 82 1981119— "� 878� "' "' 1043� m o 1232— \2G5�'� n/\61,< s AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 /— 14 /' \ 15+15 16 17/ FRUIT 21 © © sr ®o / — 14z2\ a13 — 13971106� \ 386 (/ 138 } zo4584 1252� "' 121 SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 3,876 --'7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD m PARK cT®'PC":::..� _ 18 /� 19+2� /<voim 55\ /NFo 154�/ 1412\ t 3 \ / f 63 \72+ 189 63aTH m n t13 to is as 1slz zST 1296y m py w 17; o� 24 ,1061\ 146� n `" /80< 23n \` f/ STATE FUN CCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 t6 n 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST t ROX CERTR AGOESS RO - - T T 6\ +�2t,- /nn L 3fi\O O O 29,723 4 27,128 O117/ r p \23+^ 562,933 } r2 } _r88\ 158� = ^ / / PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT FIGURE 6-5 (to SCALE YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1651 10/3/2023 814 18 0 88 434 J + 24 J + 50 J 2 + 51 ST _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST O9 /— 10+�102 — aom L 80\\\m34)'867 \ / 611 \ / t 816 \ / 89 \ — s00 J i n5 871 J i 1611\WELL NGTC1860� 43 r \ 745 } r a2 1471421 1111� "' 89fi— n o 1199— 968— < '� AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST / rn \ / \ /-6 33\`- FRUIT 21 © © ST ® 1231\ / `V t 1fi15\ n 488 — 1257 14 J } \ s1a45, 1147:— V 61 } V 9 } V 7D } SR-55 SB RAMPS 0 SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT®'pL 18+24 19+2- 1.4B21 /'—� /om- 2/wnn L it\ /w7\ 14 + < 5 i + 454TH 7 9 :1011 1© 13 14 1s \111 \ 7 }23 /ST 2� '� 68� " z�® \ 116� / \ 32: / \ 154� \ w/ \ _/ \ n/ STATE FUN ACCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 76 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENiR CCESS RD - - t 1©A — T ~ T /Yoo 1` 6\ /^nwin 26\ /aW 3\ / o \ / \ 01 O ®A © /i �48 \ /i +^t 26 \ + �Z3 \ \ 5 } r \ 9 } \ 22 } r } r \ 7288— 135 < n 5+ _ < \ 76� n / \ 208� \_ _n/ PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK OR 0 PROJECT OWY N0. 2 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PITPROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 6-6 (to SCALE YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1652 10/3/2023 840- 18 N 120 ST \ _ i 1020� m "� 7170� N 563� �,V 658� _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST "' 24\ / \\ /aim 0 1101\ 1322\ / — 1278\ n 116 f 996 i + m 48 % + n 88 r 12fi7 J + Y 280 19 WELLINGTON } \ 878— \ 97 r \ 334 } r \ 96 } \ 82 \ 221 } r 1154— 871— $ or m AVE / 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13+107 115+14 17FRUIT © ST — 1ao7 1382.4177 \ / 1 ^ / SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 3,987 --'7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD m PARK CT® :'pL ":::..i 19+2� /'—\ /' �5\/fan ` 49�/HAY 98\1472\ / — 63 \/ — 72 \®195�+ 6J+ 41 aTH 7®m13 toisass1r\ z }��\ 1z }�/ST 1z9fi— a 0� "' 17� o 28� r; N nASTATE 0,834I45� '" \ 80�p\ 231 n /\ 37, /\f\\ / \` _/ \` / CESSRD - CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 017TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT STSS RO -T /1` 6/c,o 67/p L 2/ ,750 4 27,155 8 6 / r123 \ / t 10 \ / r 1 \ / + \/J 1512� 23J +51 +11 37 \ 0 } r 1 \ 122 } \ 2 } r \ Z r \ 7207- 113+ o r 6+ < < }+ \ 17--�m m/ \ \_ 852 n/ \162-- _^/ \_ PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 PROJECT DWY NO. 2 O FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 6-7 (to SCALE YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1653 10/3/2023 285\ 70 < 24�' 109 1 3 88\ / 4572\ / i + m t 2573\ / J + t 5352\ / i f 249 \ / i + r 65\ ST _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST Is 711 O19 62\475\3 85 805 9988ss a6 1198— 58-152\/ WELLNGN —L } 381696j94 AVE ` \I 1012� a iO 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 /' \ 14 /' \ 15+116 16 / — 17 / n \ / \ \FRUIT © ST 1414\s12 — aaaB6974 nsz 7as— < s \ 1 `� / \ 1 / SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT®'PL":::...� —L }2 7 Y@.n 13 }a 3z z 714TH 9 4\ 25 �8 ; o STATE FUN -ACCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 16 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENTR CCESS RD - - -FT � r +124 /�Wm L 1 \ 27 32py } I'\ 46\ 216� m m / \ ^/ \_ M/ PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT FIGURE 6-8 (to SCALE YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1654 10/3/2023 m /inn / e n 243' 59 /",nw� 21j' - 899 \ / 4051 \ / J + t 132 \ / J + g038\ / J N f 830 / J + r 875 \ 18 \ 7926+ (' / 1508q y / / 50 } / 11 } / 496 } (� / 108 } (� / ST _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST © 10/\95\28\ / 10 2511029 3\02106 WELL NGTON 104 8670 20811594 fLW } 42a O+�22--_ \89r�0 '5 \/ 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 /' 14 /' 15 /' 16 / m — 17 / \ / \ 7P\ / o< \\ / o� \\ •- FRUIT 21 © © ST J N 434 t 7537 J+ 16 J 1161— 145 } / 214 A \ 613� / \1285� "' / \716� m ,`� / \ 1271 SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK D., 0 4,070 --'7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD m PARK CT®'PL":::...� 19 /�' ©0 /' 21 /'—� / ,nm L 74\ /NFo L 16\ /fan ` 51\ /Neo L 103\ / 1546\ / t i \ / t 3 \ / f 66 \ / f 79 \ U ::'::':1 J+ 198 J+ N s8 J+ N 32 J+ 6 J+ 37 0 4TH 7 ®^9 }: 10 11 Q 13 14 15 51 } / ` 2 } i / 1 54 } i / 2 } / ` 13 ST 1367— '^ 2� `m 0� i6� z9� ASTATE 1,932 \ 153�'^`� / \ 01 / \ 64� n / \ 24� n / \ - \` f/ \` �/ \\ / \` _/ \` / CESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 07TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT STSS ROT /a18\+12 /na,209 4 28,484 / J + 323 \ /J+ 57 o }� / zz }r/92 PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT FIGURE 6-9 (to SCALE YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1655 10/3/2023 28a 70 < 23�' 109 — 18 0 92 ST _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST /maw 91\\ 919 \ °i 106 19 19 WELLINGTON 903— I ss r I 1 1ss } r 1 27 } as / 184 } I 1521 1168� '" 940� m `* 1204� 0 1259— 101fi� r iO AVE 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13 /' \ 14 /' \ 15 /— \ 16 /m— 17 \\ FRUIT 21 © © ST ® / - f 5181\ 1743\ 512 t iav J } s J } } } 890-- � 74 } 3 A \1zoa1 SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 —7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD N PARK CT®'pL 18+2,2 19 /' /Nma L 37\ 2/ — o \,7Jim 3zsa77 m n z }r�1 m }[�}�Iza}�4TH ST 2� ^ 77; er 35; M STATE FUN CCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 t6 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENTR CCESS RD - - 5 +124 T T /nmw � 26/^W L 3\\1 2 32/ r2 \ O Q 27�+ 13 942 } r}r11351— \ 78\ 218� / \ ^/ \_ "/ PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR O CABRILLO PARK OR O PROJECT OWY N0. 2 O FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 6-10 (to SCALE YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT PLUS PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1656 10/3/2023 18 ro J N 126 377 J + 13 J + 41 J N 8 J + 59 ST \ 1926' _ ELK LN 0 1-5 SB ON -RAMP 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 YORBA ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST FIRST ST © 25\ 019 / t 1129\ / 1080\ / t 1388\ / t 1341\ WELLINGTON J } 121 f 1045 J + ^ 51 J + n 92 / J r 1329\ \ 921— / \ 104 r 86 / \ 233 2081 1202� "' 957— �' 1017� '^ r 1216— 1-5 SB ON -RAMP/ 1-5 NB RAMPS 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 GOLDEN CIRCLE DR O PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 13+J434'/l 14 / ' \ 15 / ' \ 16 / — 17/in 72\FRUIT ST / 779 \ / r 1824\ / t 7547 J 16 JJ}\/V197 /ae } / \z,a \1275� "' / \116� m n / \ 1271 a SR-55 SB RAMPS O SR-55 NB RAMPS 0 YORBA ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 4,181 --'7 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST STATE FUND ACCESS RD XEROX CENTRE ACCESS RD m PARK CT®'pL ":::..i _ 18 /' 19 /' ©0 /' 21+24 69\ / em L 74\ /Nmo L16/inn 1546\ / `� — i \ / t3 \ 79®204 J + 58 J + 32 43aTHm n tQ 13 to is \s, } \ z } r / } }ST1367— 2�4 ,764 32,355,52�\ 01 / STATE FUN CCESS RD CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 MABURY ST 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 0 16 17TH ST WELLINGTON AVE WELLINGTON AVE FRUIT ST FRUIT ST :C ROX CENTR CCESS R0 - - T ~ T +12 \2 3 31,236 4 28,5112 J34,514 } r 22'} r 7265— 1\ 170� PARK CENTER DR 0 TUSTIN AVE 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 CABRILLO PARK DR 0 PROJECT DWY NO. 2 0 FRUIT ST FRUIT ST PARK COURT PIT PROJECT DWY NO. 1 4TH ST FIGURE 6-11 (to SCALE YEAR 2045 HUILDOUT PLUS PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR AN DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USED PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1657 10/3/2023 7.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The relative impact of the proposed Project during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the twenty-five (25) key study intersections, without, then with, the proposed Project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume -to -capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersection. The significance of the potential impacts of the Project at each key intersection was then evaluated using the following traffic impact criteria. 7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds 7.1.1 City of Santa Ana Based on the City of Santa Ana, impacts to local and regional transportation systems are considered significant if any of the following would occur: ■ Project traffic would cause an intersection currently operating at an acceptable peak hour Level of Service (LOS) to operate at an unacceptable peak hour LOS. The City of Santa Ana considers LOS D to be the minimum acceptable LOS for all intersections. ■ The project increases traffic demand by 1% of capacity (ICU increase >_ 0.01) at a signalized study intersection forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS. ■ At unsignalized intersections, an impact is considered to be significant if the project causes an intersection at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or F. 7.1.2 City of Tustin For those study intersections within the jurisdiction of the City of Tustin, impacts to local and regional transportation systems are considered significant if: ■ An unacceptable peak hour Level of Service (LOS) at any of the key intersections is projected. The City of Tustin considers LOS D to be the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the peak commute hours. For this analysis, if the project increases traffic demand at the study intersection by 1% of capacity (ICU increase >_ 0.010), causing or worsening LOS E or F (ICU > 0.901), the impact is considered significant. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 28 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1658 10/3/2023 7.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios The following scenarios are those for which volume/capacity calculations have been performed at the twenty-five (25) key intersections for existing plus project, near -term (Year 2026) and long-term (Year 2045) traffic conditions: A. Existing Traffic Conditions; B. Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions; C. Scenario (B) with Improvements, if necessary; D. Near -Term (Year 2026) Cumulative Traffic Conditions, E. Near -Term (Year 2026) Cumulative plus Project Traffic Conditions; F. Scenario (E) with Improvements, if necessary; G. Long -Term (Year 2045) Future Traffic Conditions; H. Long -Term (Year 2045) Future Traffic Conditions plus Project Traffic; and I. Scenario (H) with Improvements, if necessary. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 29 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1659 10/3/2023 8.0 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 8.1 Existing Plus Project Analysis Table 8-1 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the twenty-five (25) key study intersections for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS values and HCM/LOS values in Table 8-1 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The second column (2) lists existing plus project traffic conditions. The third column (3) shows the increase in ICU value and/or HCM value due to the added peak hour Project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will exceed the LOS thresholds mentioned in this report. The fourth column (4) presents the resultant level of service with the inclusion of recommended traffic improvements, where needed, to achieve an acceptable level of service. 8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of columns (2) and (3) of Table 8-1 indicates that the twenty-five (25) study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of project traffic to existing traffic. Appendix D presents the existing plus project ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the twenty- five (25) key study intersections. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 30 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1660 10/3/2023 TABLE 8-1 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS O (3) (4) „ (1) (2) Exceed LOS Existing Plus Project A Existing Existing Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements Traffic Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - (1) Conditions d TimU KeyIntersection Period Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Elk Lane at AM 0.607 B 0.607 B 0.000 No 1. D First Street PM 0.727 C 0.733 C 0.006 No I-5 SB On Ramp at AM 2. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 First Street PM Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.456 A 0.445 A -0.011 No 3' D First Street PM 0.551 A 0.554 A 0.003 No Golden Circle Drive at AM 0.337 A 0.336 A -0.001 No 4 D First Street PM 0.332 A 0.332 A 0.000 No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.351 A 0.350 A -0.001 No 5 D First Street PM 0.374 A 0.375 A 0.001 No Yorba Street at AM 0.404 A 0.401 A -0.003 No 6 D First Street PM 0.484 A 0.485 A 0.001 No I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at T D AM Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 41, Street PM I-5 NB Ramps at AM 8. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 4t, Street PM Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.559 A 0,550 A -0.009 No 9 D 411 Street PM 0.723 C 0.730 C 0.007 No Note: Bold ICU/LOS or HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) LINScmr, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 31 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 - 1661 10/3/2023 TABLE 8-1 (CONTINUED) EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS O (3) (4) d (1) (2) Exceed LOS Existing Plus Project A Existing Existing Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements Traffic Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - (1) Conditions U Time KeyIntersection Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Golden Circle Drive at AM 0.412 A 0.412 A 0.000 No 10. D 41, Street PM 0.412 A 0.436 A 0.024 No Park Center Drive at AM 13.9 s/v B 13.3 s/v B -0.6 s/v No 11. D 4t1 Street PM 16.5 s/v C 16.8 s/v C 0.3 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.609 B 0.592 A -0.017 No 12. D 41, Street PM 0.748 C 0.753 C 0.005 No SR-55 SB Ramps at AM 13. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 411 Street PM SR-55 NB Ramps at AM 14. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 41, Street PM Yorba Street at AM 0.518 A 0.515 A -0.003 No 15. D 41, Street PM 0.564 A 0.566 A 0.002 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.312 A 0.316 A 0.004 No 16. D State Fund Access Road PM 0.345 A 0.348 A 0.003 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.274 A 0.278 1 0.004 No 17. D Xerox Centre Access Road PM 0.3t2 A 0.315 A 0.003 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.575 A 0.572 A -0.003 No 18. D 17t1 Street PM 0.620 B 0.619 L -0.001 No Note: • Bold ICU/LOS or HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v - seconds per vehicle (delay) LINScOTr, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 32 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fatrneld Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 - 1662 10/3/2023 TABLE 8-1 (CONTINUED) EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS O (3) (4) v (1) (2) Exceed LOS Existing Plus Project A Existing Existing Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements Traffic u Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - 0) Conditions d Time KeyIntersection Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 18.1 s/v C 18.2 s/v C 0.1 s/v No 19 D Wellington Avenue PM 18.3 s/v C 18.2 s/v C 0.0 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.583 A 0.579 A -0.004 No 20 D Wellington Avenue PM 0.416 A 0.413 A -0.003 No Mabury Street at AM 7.7 s/v A 7.7 s/v A 0.0 s/v No 21 D Fruit Street PM 7.7 s/v A 7.7 s/v A 0.0 s/v No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 12.7 s/v B 12.7 s/v B 0.0 s/v No 22. D Fruit Street PM 11.7 s/v B 11.9 s/v B 0.2 s/v No Park Center Drive at AM 10.3 s/v B 10.6 s/v B 0.3 s/v No 23. D Fruit Street PM 10.5 s/v B 10.8 s/v B 0.3 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.516 A 0.517 A 0.001 No 24 D Fruit Street PM 0.452 A 0.450 A -0.002 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 19.0 S/v C 21.0 s/v C17 2.0 s/v No 0.378 Ats 25 D Park Court Place PM 25.1 s/v D 24.2 s/v C -0.9 s/v No 0.275 A18 Note: Bold ICU/LOS or HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) r t The westbound approach has been conservatively assessed as a shared left/du u/right. If the final design includes an exclusive left turn lane the LOS will be better than reported values 18 Cabrillo Park Drive at Park Court Place is planned to be converted to a signalized intersection. With implementation of the planned improvement the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable service levels. as shown in column 4. LINScoT-r, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 33 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Faiffldd Cabrillo Toxin Center, Sams Am\Repo \4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr Jem Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.dm City Council 18 - 1663 10/3/2023 8.2 Year 2026 Traffic Conditions Table 8-2 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the twenty-five (25) key study intersections for the Year 2026 horizon year. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values in Table 8-2 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The second column (2) lists projected cumulative traffic conditions (existing plus ambient plus related projects traffic) based on existing intersection geometry, but without any traffic generated from the proposed Project. The third column (3) presents forecast Year 2026 near -term traffic conditions with the addition of Project traffic. The fourth column (4) shows the increase in ICU value and/or HCM value due to the added peak hour Project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will exceed the LOS thresholds mentioned in this report. The fifth column (5) presents the resultant level of service with the inclusion of recommended traffic improvements, where needed, to achieve an acceptable level of service. 8.2.1 Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Conditions Review of column (2) of Table 8-2 indicates that the one (1) of the twenty-five (25) study intersections will operate at unacceptable service levels during the PM peak hour. The remaining study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersections forecast to operate adversely consist of the following: Key Intersection 1. Elk Lane at First Street AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU/HCM LOS ICUMCM LOS - 0.941 E 8.2.2 Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Review of columns (3) and (4) of Table 8-2 indicates that two (2) of the twenty-five (25) study intersections will operate at unacceptable service levels during the PM peak hour. The remaining study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersections forecast to operate adversely consist of the following: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Key Intersection ICUMCM LOS ICUMCM LOS 1. Elk Lane at First Street - 0.946 E 9. Cabrillo Park Drive at 4t' Street - 0.903 E Although the intersection of Elk Lane/First Street operates adversely during the PM peak hour, the proposed Project adds less than 0.010 increment to the ICU value and is therefore does not require recommended improvements based on the LOS standards and criteria specified in this report. Review of column (5) of Table 8-2 indicates that Cabrillo Park Drive/4t' Street exceeds the level of service thresholds and requires Project -related improvements. However, a review of column (5) indicates that the implementation of recommended improvements at this study intersection will help offset the Project's increment. Recommended improvements are discussed in Section 12.0. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 34 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 ^'99 �Q+��++ Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixennd- //1 Tae.�Prrns��errt Santa Ana City Council NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Artall(dpa 451[RFi 4o To" Center Mixed -Use Project RevID13/SGi02311-18-2022.doc Appendix D also presents the near -term ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the twenty-five (25) key study intersections. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 35 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '99 +��yGG Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixennd--/1 Tae.�Prrns��errt Santa Ana City Council N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa AnlBtiatt\451LF� Sir Town Center Mixed -Use Project Rev1013/SGi02311-18-2022.doc TABLE8-2 YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS n O (2) (3) (4) (5) Year 2026 Cumulative .a „ (1) Year 2026 Year 2026 Cumulative Exceed LOS Plus Project Existing Cumulative Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements m Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - (1) Traffic Conditions � U Time Key Intersection Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Elk Lane at AM 0.607 B 0.764 C 0.764 C 0.000 No 1' D First Street PM 0.727 C 0.941 E 0.946 E 0.005 No I-5 SB On Ramp at AM 2. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 First Street PM Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.456 A 0.554 A 0.554 A 0.000 No 3 D First Street PM 0.551 A 0.692 B 0.695 B 0.003 No Golden Circle Drive at AM 0.337 A 0.401 A 0.400 A -0.001 No 4' D First Street PM 0.332 A 0.400 A 0.400 A 0.000 No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.351 A 0.464 A 0.463 A -0.001 No 5 D First Street PM 0.374 A 0.434 A 0.435 A 0.001 No Yorba Street at AM 0.404 A 0.439 A 0.436 A -0.003 No 6' D First Street PM 0.484 A 0.541 A 0.543 A 0.002 No I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at AM 7. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 4t1 Street PM I-5 NB Ramps at AM 8' D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 41, Street PM Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.559 A 0.660 B 0.622 B -0,038 No 0.604 B 9' D 4t' Street PM 0.723 C 0.891 D 0.903 E 0.012 Yes 0.858 D Note: • Bold ICU/LOS or HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v - seconds per vehicle (delay) LINSCoTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 36 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fatrneld Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Am\R pon\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.dm City Council 18 - 1666 10/3/2023 TABLE 8-2 (CONTINUED) YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS O (2) (3) (4) (5) Year 2026 Cumulative E 9 (1) Year 2026 Year 2026 Cumulative Exceed LOS Plus Project E Existing Cumulative Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - 0) Traffic Conditions Time Key Intersection Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Golden Circle Drive at AM 0.412 A 0.467 A 0.467 A 0.000 No 10. D 4t1 Street PM 0.412 A 0.504 A 0.528 A 0.024 No Park Center Drive at AM 13.9 s/v B 15.5 S/v C 14.8 s/v B -0.7 s/v No 11. D 411 Street PM 16.5 s/v C 21.1 s/v C 21.7 s/v C 0.6 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.609 B 0.805 D 0.800 C -0.005 No 12 D 4" Street PM 0.748 C 0.859 D 0.864 D 0.005 No SR-55 SB Ramps at AM 13. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 4t1 Street PM SR-55 NB Ramps at AM 14. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 4a' Street PM Yorba Street at AM 0.518 A 0.559 A 0.556 A -0.003 No 15. D 4a' Street PM 0.564 A 0.627 B 0.629 B 0.002 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.312 A 0.346 A 0.350 A 0.004 No 16. D State Fund Access Road PM 0.345 A 0.408 A 0.411 A 0.003 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.274 A 0.349 A 0.353 A 0.004 No 17. D Xerox Centre Access Road PM 0.312 A 0.406 A 0.392 A -0.014 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.575 A 0.671 B 0.668 B -0.003 No 18. D 17d' Street PM 0.620 B 0.744 C 0.743 C -0.001 No Note. • Bold ICU/LOS or HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v - seconds per vehicle (delay) LINScoTr, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 37 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 - 1667 10/3/2023 TABLE 8-2 (CONTINUED) YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS O (2) (3) (4) (5) Year 2026 Cumulative E 9 (1) Year 2026 Year 2026 Cumulative Exceed LOS Plus Project E Existing Cumulative Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - 0) Traffic Conditions Time Key Intersection Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 18.1 s/v C 23.5 s/v C 23.6 s/v C 0.1 s/v No 19 D Wellington Avenue PM 18.3 s/v C 22.6 s/v C 22.4 s/v C -0.2 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.583 A 0.612 B 0.609 B -0.003 No 20 D Wellington Avenue PM 0.416 A 0.443 A 0.441 A -0.002 No Mabury Street at AM 7.7 s/v A 7.8 s/v A 7.8 s/v A 0.0 s/v No 21 D Fruit Street PM 7.7 s/v A 7.8 s/v A 7.8 s/v A 0.0 s/v No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 12.7 s/v B 14.3 s/v B 14.4 s/v B 0.1 s/v No 22. D Fruit Street PM 11.7 s/v B 13.4 s/v B 13.7 s/v B 0.3 s/v No Park Center Drive at AM 10.3 s/v B 10.5 s/v B 10.8 s/v B 0.3 s/v No 23 D Fruit Street PM 10.5 s/v B 10.7 s/v B 11.1 S/v B 0.4 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.516 A 0.550 A 0.550 A 0.000 No 24. D Fruit Street PM 0.452 A 0.484 A 0.482 A -0.002 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 19.0 s/v C 0.498 A 0.481 A19 -0.017 No 25 D Park Court Place PM 25.1 s/v D 0.421 A 0.371 A -0.050 No Note: • Bold ICU/LOS or HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) 19 The westbound approach has been conservatively assessed as a shared left/thru/right. If the final design includes an exclusive left turn lane the LOS will be better than reported values LINScoTr, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 38 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Ta Cen-, Sams Am\R pon\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr Jem Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.dm City Council 18 - 1668 10/3/2023 8.3 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions Table 8-3 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the twenty-five (25) key study intersections for the Year 2045. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values in Table 8- 3 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The second column (2) lists projected Year 2045 long-term traffic conditions based on existing intersection geometry, but without any traffic generated from the proposed Project. The third column (3) presents forecast Year 2045 long-term traffic conditions with the addition of Project traffic. The fourth column (4) shows the increase in ICU value and/or HCM value due to the added peak hour Project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will exceed the LOS thresholds mentioned in this report. The fifth column (5) presents the resultant level of service with the inclusion of recommended traffic improvements, where needed, to achieve an acceptable level of service. 8.3.1 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions Review of column (2) of Table 8-3 indicates that the three (3) of the twenty-five (25) study intersections will operate at unacceptable service levels during the PM peak hour. The remaining study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersections forecast to operate adversely consist of the following: Key Intersection 1. Elk Lane at First Street 9. Cabrillo Park Drive at 4"' Street 12. Tustin Avenue at 4' Street 8.3.2 Year 2045 Plus Project Traffic Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS - 0.985 E - - 0.933 E - - 0.925 E Review of columns (3) of Table 8-3 indicates that three (3) of the twenty-five (25) study intersections will operate at unacceptable service levels during the PM peak hour. The remaining study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersections forecast to operate adversely consist of the following: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Key Intersection ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS 1. Elk Lane at First Street - 0.990 E 9. Cabrillo Park Drive at 4'h Street - - 0.945 E 12. Tustin Avenue at 4' Street - 0.930 E LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 39 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1669 10/3/2023 Although the intersection of Elk Lane/First Street and Tustin Avenue/41h Street operates adversely during the PM peak hour, the proposed Project adds less than 0.010 increment to the ICU value and is therefore does not require recommended improvements based on the LOS standards and criteria specified in this report. Review of column (5) of Table 8-3 indicates that Cabrillo Park Drive/4th Street exceeds the level of service thresholds and requires Project -related improvements. However, a review of column (5) indicates that the implementation of recommended improvements at this study intersection will help offset the Project's increment. Recommended improvements are discussed in Section 12.0. Appendix D also presents the long-term ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the twenty-five (25) key study intersections. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 40 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1670 10/3/2023 TABLE8-3 YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS (3) (4) (5) Year 2045 Buildout E 9 (1) (2) Year 2045 Buildout Exceed LOS Plus Project Existing Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements c d Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions M - 0) Traffic Conditions � U Time Key Intersection Q Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Elk Lane at AM 0.607 B 0.794 C 0.793 C -0.001 No 1' D First Street PM 0.727 C 0.985 E 0.990 E 0.005 No I-5 SB On Ramp at AM 2. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 First Street PM Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.456 A 0.579 A 0.579 A 0.013 No 3 D First Street PM 0.551 A 0.724 C 0.728 C 0.004 No Golden Circle Drive at AM 0.337 A 0.464 A 0.463 A -0.001 No 4' D First Street PM 0.332 A 0.472 A 0.473 A 0.001 No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.351 A 0.487 A 0.486 A -0.001 No 5 D First Street PM 0.374 A 0.455 A 0.456 A 0.001 No Yorba Street at AM 0.404 A 0.464 A 0.461 A -0.003 No 6' D First Street PM 0.484 A 0.565 A 0.567 A 0.002 No I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at AM 7. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 4t1 Street PM I-5 NB Ramps at AM 8' D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 411 Street PM Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.559 A 0.691 B 0.653 B -0.038 No 0.628 B 9' D 411 Street PM 0.723 C 0.933 E 0.945 E 0.012 Yes 0.899 D Note: Bold ICU/LOS or HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) LINSCOTr, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 41 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 - 1671 10/3/2023 TABLE 8-3 (CONTINUED) YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 3 (4) 5 Year 2045 Bu dout (1) (2) Year 2045 Buildout Exceed LOS Plus Project c Existing Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements a Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions M - 0) Traffic Conditions u U Time Key Intersection d Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Golden Circle Drive at AM 0.412 A 0.504 A 0.504 A 0.000 No 10. D 411 Street PM 0.412 A 0.527 A 0.551 A 0.024 No Park Center Drive at AM 13.9 s/v B 16.8 s/v C 16.0 s/v C -0.8 s/v No 11. D 4t1 Street PM 16.5 s/v C 25.3 s/v D 26.0 s/v D 0.7 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.609 B 0.731 C 0.726 C -0.005 No 12 D 4t1 Street PM 0.748 C 0.925 E 1 0.930 E 0.005 No SR-55 SB Ramps at AM 13. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 4t1 Street PM SR-55 NB Ramps at AM 14. D Caltrans Intersection, See Section 9.0 411 Street PM Yorba Street at AM 0.518 A 0.629 B 0.626 B -0.003 No 15. D 411 Street PM 0.564 A 0.710 C 0.712 C 0.002 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.312 A 0.361 A 0.364 A 0.003 No 16. D State Fund Access Road PM 0.345 A 0.426 A 0.429 A 0.003 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.274 A 0.365 A 0.368 A 0.003 No 17. D Xerox Centre Access Road PM 0.312 A 0.423 A 0.410 A -0.013 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 0.575 A 0.702 C 0.699 B -0.003 No 18 D 17" Street PM 0.620 B 0.779 C 0.778 C -0.001 No Now Bold ICU/LOS or HCMlLOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v - seconds per vehicle (delay) LINSCOTr, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 42 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 - 1672 10/3/2023 TABLE 8-3 (CONTINUED) YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 3 (4) 5 Year 2045 Bu dout (1) (2) Year 2045 Buildout Exceed LOS Plus Project c Existing Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Thresholds Plus Improvements a Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions M - 0) Traffic Conditions u U Time Key Intersection Period ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 18.1 S/v C 26.5 s/v D 26.7 s/v D 0.2 s/v No 19 D Wellington Avenue PM 18.3 s/v C 25.2 s/v D 25.0 s/v C -0.2 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.583 A 0.644 B 0.641 B -0.003 No 20 D Wellington Avenue PM 0.416 A 0.463 A 0.460 A -0.003 No Mabury Street at AM 7.9 s/v A 8.1 s/v A 7.9 s/v A -0.2 s/v No 21 D Fruit Street PM 7.8 s/v A 8.0 s/v A 7.8 s/v A -0.2 s/v No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 13.9 s/v B 17.6 s/v C 15.5 S/v C -2.1 s/v No 22 D Fruit Street PM 12.3 s/v B 15.6 s/v C 14.6 s/v C -1.0 S/v No Park Center Drive at AM 10.3 s/v B 11.2 s/v B 11.5 S/v B 0.3 s/v No 23. D Fruit Street PM 10.5 S/v B 11.7 s/v B 12.1 s/v B 0.4 s/v No Tustin Avenue at AM 0.516 A 0.573 A 0.573 A 0.000 No 24 D Fruit Street PM 0.452 A 0.505 A 0.503 A -0.002 No Cabrillo Park Drive at AM 19.0 S/v C 0.520 A 0.503 A20 -0.017 No 25 D Park Court Place PM 25.1 s/v D 0.438 A 0.338 A -0.050 No Note: Bold ICU/LOS or HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Cities LOS standards. s/v - seconds per vehicle (delay) 20 The westbound approach has been conservatively assessed as a shared left/thru/right. If the final design includes an exclusive left turn lane the LOS will be better than reported values LINscoTr, LAw & GREENSPAN, et191tleerS 43 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Toxin Center, Santa Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 - 1673 10/3/2023 9.0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) ANALYSIS In conformance with the current Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, dated December 2002, existing and projected peak hour operating conditions at the five (5) state-controlled study intersections within the study area have been evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual operations method of analysis. These state-controlled locations include the following study intersections: 2. I-5 SB On -Ramp at First Street (City of Santa Ana/Caltrans) 7. I-5 SB On-Ramp/Mabury Street at 4th Street (City of Santa Ana/Caltrans) 8. I-5 NB Ramps at 41h Street (City of Santa Ana/Caltrans) 13. SR-55 SB Ramps at 4th Street (City of Santa Ana/Caltrans) 14. SR-55 NB Ramps at 4' Street (City of Tustin/Caltrans) Caltrans "endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS "C" and LOS "D" on State highway facilities"; it does not require that LOS " M (shall) be maintained. However, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS. For this analysis, LOS D is the target level of service standard and will be utilized to assess the project impacts at the state-controlled study intersections. The Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, dated December 2002 states that if an existing State-owned facility operates at less than the target LOS (i.e. LOS D); the existing service level should be maintained. Based on Caltrans Criteria, a Project's impact is considered significant if the Project causes the LOS to change from an acceptable LOS (i.e., LOS D or better) to a deficient LOS (i.e. LOS E or F). 9.1 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) Based on the HCM 6th Edition operations method of analysis, level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, geometries, traffic and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during ideal conditions: in the absence of traffic control, in the absence of geometric delay, in the absence of any incidents and when there are no other vehicles on the road. In the HCM, only the portion of total delay attributed to the control facility is quantified. This delay is called control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay and final acceleration delay. Specifically, LOS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service that have been defined along with the corresponding HCM control delay value range for signalized intersections are shown in Table 9-1. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 44 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1674 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM)II Level of Service (LOS) Control Delay Per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service Description This level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive A < 10.0 during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. This level generally occurs with good B > 10.0 and < 20.0 progression, short cycle lengths, or both. More — vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. Average traffic delays. These higher delays may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may C > 20.0 and < 35.0 begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Long traffic delays. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some D > 35.0 and < 55.0 combination of unfavorable progression, long — cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Very long traffic delays. This level is considered by many agencies (i.e. SANBAG) to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high E > 55.0 and < 80.0 delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Severe congestion. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates F >_ 80.0 exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing factors to such delay levels. Ll Source: Highway Capacity Manual (Signalized Intersections). LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 45 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 -Fairfield Cahrilln Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Rennrt\4531 Cabrillo Tnwn Center Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1675 10/3/2023 9.2 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Table 9-2 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the five (5) state-controlled study intersections for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) of HCM/LOS values in Table 9-2 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic. The second column (2) lists existing plus project traffic conditions with current intersection geometry/lane configurations. The third column (3) shows the increase in delay value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will level of service thresholds defined in this report. The fourth column (4) indicates the anticipated level of service with improvements, if any. 9.2.1 Existing Traffic Conditions Review of column (1) of Table 9-2 indicates that the intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4' Street currently operates at unacceptable LOS F in the AM peak hour. The remaining state-controlled study intersections currently operate at LOS C or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. 9.2.2 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of columns (2) and (3) of Table 9-2 indicates that the intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4tb Street will continue to operate at unacceptable LOS F in the AM peak hour with the addition of project traffic. The remaining state-controlled study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, with the addition of project traffic. Review of column (4) of Table 9-2 indicates that the implementation of recommended improvements at the intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street will help offset the Project's increment. Recommended improvements are discussed in Section 12.0. Additionally, queues for the I-5 SB Ramps at 4th Street, I-5 NB Ramp at 4th Street, SR-55 SB Ramps at 4th Street, and SR-55 NB Ramps at 4th Street were reviewed and the existing vehicular storage capacity is considered adequate under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. Table 9-3 presents the queueing results for the Caltrans study intersection ramps. Appendix E presents the existing plus project HCM/LOS calculations for the state-controlled study intersections. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 46 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nixed-lice Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1676 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-2 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY - CALTRANS (3) (4) (1) (2) Exceed LOS Existing Plus Project Existing Existing Plus Project Thresholds Traffic Conditions Time Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - (1) with Improvements HCM LOS HCM LOS Increase Yes/No HCM LOS Key Intersection Period I-5 SB On Ramp at AM 7.2 s/v A 7.2 s/v A 0.0 s/v No 2. First Street PM 7.3 s/v A C 6.9 s/v A -0.4 s/v No I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabuly Street at AM 26.3 s/v 26.6 s/v C 0.3 s/v No 7. 40' street PM 29.0 s/v C 28.7 s/v C -0.3 s/v No I-5 NB Ramps at AM 6.8 s/v A 6.9 s/v A 0.1 s/v No 8. 41' Street PM 26.6 s/v C 24.1 s/v C -2.5 s/v No - SR-55 SB Ramps at AM 151.8 s/v F 158.0 s/v F 6.2 s/v No 27.2 s/v G22 13. 41' Street PM 27.5 s/v C 27.1 s/v C -0.4 s/v No 24.9 s/v C SR-55 NB Ramps at AM 25.1 s/v C 25.4 s/v C 0.3 s/v No 14. 41' Street PM 18.9 s/v B 18.2 s/v B -0.7 s/v No Note. Bold HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Caltrans LOS standards. s/v - seconds per vehicle (delay) 22 Although the intersection is not considered a significant impact based on Caltrans criteria, level of service results at the intersection with the implementation of improvements discussed in Section 11.0 have been included for informational nurooses. LiNscoTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 47 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Soma Ana\Repon\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jeer Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.dw City Council 18 - 1677 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-3 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CALTRANS OFF -RAMP PEAK HOUR QUEUING ANALYSIS" (1) (2) Existing Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Max. Max. Max. Max. Storage Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Min. Min. Min. Min. Provided Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Key Study Intersection (feet) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) 7. I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at 41' street Southbound Left -Turn 288' 24 40' Yes 37' Yes 37' Yes 41' Yes Southbound Through 970' 65' Yes 50' Yes 67' Yes 51' Yes Southbound Shared Through/Right-Turn 970' 63' Yes 47' Yes 65' Yes 48' Yes 8. I-5 NB Ramps at 411 Street Northbound Left -Turn 360' 47' Yes 118' Yes 49' Yes 118' Yes 13. SR-55 SB Ramps at 411 Street Southbound Left -Turn 1,400' 36' Yes 223' Yes 28' Yes 223' Yes Southbound SharedLefdRight-Turn 1,400' 35' Yes 221' Yes 27' Yes 222' Yes SouthboundRight-Turn 165' 34' Yes 214' Yes25 27' Yes 215' Yes25 Queues are based on HCM 95' Percentile methodology. 24 The southbound left -turn consists of dual lanes. The first lane consists of approximately 140 feet of storage and the second lane consists of approximately 435 feet of storage. The storage reported is the average of both lanes. 25 AlthouRh the queue exceeds the right -turn storage, the ramp has the capacity to accommodate the additional spillover queue. LiNscoTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 48 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabd1lo Town Center, SaaM Ana\Repon\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jeer Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.dw City Council 18 — 1678 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-3 (CONTINUED) EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CALTRANS OFF -RAMP PEAK HOUR QUEUING ANALYSIS" (1) (2) Existing Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Max. Max. Max. Max. Storage Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate QIIeUe/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Min. Min. Min. Min. Provided Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Key Study Intersection (feet) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) 14. SR-55 NB Ramps at 411 Street Northbound Left -Turn 1,200' 172' Yes 136' Yes 170' Yes 135' Yes Northbound Shared Through/Lefftbt-Turn 1,200' 167' Yes 129' Yes 165' Yes 129' Yes Northbound Right -Turn 700' 163' Yes 123' Yes 161' Yes 122' Yes co Queues are based on HCM 95" Percentile methodology. LINSCoTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 49 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana Nd4500\2224531 - Faufeld Cabrillo Town Center, SaaM Aaa\Repon\4531 Cabr0lo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.dw City Council 18 — 1679 10/3/2023 9.3 Year 2026 Traffic Conditions Table 9-4 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the at the five (5) state-controlled study intersections for the Year 2026 horizon year. The first column (1) of HCM/LOS values in Table 9-4 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The second column (2) lists future Year 2026 cumulative traffic conditions (existing plus ambient growth traffic plus cumulative projects traffic), without any traffic generated by the proposed Project. The third column (3) presents future forecast traffic conditions with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed Project. The fourth column (4) shows the increase in delay value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will level of service thresholds defined in this report. The fifth column (5) indicates the anticipated level of service with improvements, if any. 9.3.1 Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Conditions Review of Column (2) of Table 9-4 indicates that the intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street is forecast to operate at unacceptable LOS F in the AM peak hour. The remaining state-controlled study intersections are forecast to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. 9.3.2 Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of columns (3) and (4) of Table 9-4 indicates that the intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street will continue to operate at unacceptable LOS F in the AM peak hour with the addition of project traffic. The remaining state-controlled study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, with the addition of project traffic. Review of column (4) of Table 9-4 indicates that the implementation of recommended improvements at the intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street will help offset the Project's increment. Recommended improvements are discussed in Section 12.0. Additionally, queues for the I-5 SB Ramps at 4th Street, I-5 NB Ramp at 4th Street, SR-55 SB Ramps at 4th Street, and SR-55 NB Ramps at 4th Street were reviewed and the existing vehicular storage capacity is considered adequate under Year 2026 Plus Project traffic conditions. Table 9-5 presents the queueing results for the Caltrans study intersection ramps. Appendix E presents the Year 2026 HCM/LOS calculations for the state-controlled study intersections. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 50 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 -Fairfield Cahrilln Tnwn Center_ Santa Ana\Rennrt\4531 Cabrillo Tnwn Center Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1680 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-4 YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY - CALTRANS (2) (3) (4) (1) Year 2026 Cumulative Exceeds LOS 2026 Cumulative Year Plus Project Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Thresholds Traffic Conditions Time Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - 0) with Improvements HCM LOS HCM LOS Increase Yes/No HCM LOS Key Intersection Period I-5 SB On Ramp at AM 8.5 s/v A 8.5 s/v A 0.0 S/v No 2. First Street PM 8.8 s/v A 8.4 s/v A -0.4 s/v No No I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at AM 26.6 s/v C 26.7 s/v C 0.1 S/v 7. 49' street PM 27.4 s/v C 27.0 s/v C -0.4 s/v No I-5 NB Ramps at AM 6.9 s/v A 7.0 s/v A 0.1 S/v No 8. 41' Street PM 8.8 s/v A 8.8 s/v A 0.0 S/v No SR-55 SB Ramps at AM 176.4 s/v F 182.3 s/v F 5.9 s/v No 25.0 s/v C27 13. 401 Street PM 36.2 s/v D 34.9 s/v C -1.3 s/v No 26.5 s/v C SR-55 NB Ramps at AM 45.1 s/v D 45.4 s/v D 0.3 s/v No 14. 41b Street PM 36.1 s/v D 34.5 s/v C -1.6 s/v No Note. Bold HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Caltrans LOS standards. s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) 27 Although the intersection is not considered a significant impact based on Caltrans criteria, level of service results at the intersection with the implementation of improvements discussed in Section 12.0 have been included for informational purposes. 0 LiNscoTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 51 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield CabrIDo Town Center, Sanra Ana\Repon\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jeer Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-20224 City Council 18 - 1681 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-5 YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE CALTRANS OFF -RAMP PEAK HOUR QUEUING ANALYSIS28 (1) (2) Year 2026 Cumulative Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Max. Max. Max. Max. Storage Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Min. Min. Min. Min. Provided Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Key Study Intersection (feet) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) 7. I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at 411 street Southbound Left -Turn 288' 29 58' Yes 76' Yes 55' Yes 82' Yes Southbound Through 970' 85' Yes 82' Yes 89' Yes 85' Yes Southbound Shared Through/Right-Turn 970' 81' Yes 76' Yes 84' Yes 79' Yes 8. I-5 NB Ramps at 4"' Street Northbound Left -Turn 360' 49' Yes 101' Yes 51' Yes 100' Yes 13. SR-55 SB Ramps at 411 Street SouthboundLeft -Turn 1,400' 58' Yes 283' Yes 49' Yes 286' Yes Southbound Shared LeAlRight-Turn 1,400' 54' Yes 289' Yes 46' Yes 292' Yes Southbound Right -Turn 165' 54' Yes 301' Yes30 46' Yes 304' Yes30 Gd Queues are based on HCM 95'" Percentile methodology. 29 The southbound left -turn consists of dual lanes. The first lane consists of approximately 140 feet of storage and the second lane consists of approximately 435 feet of storage. The storage reported is the average of both lanes. 30 Although the queue exceeds the right -turn storage, the ramp has the capacity to accommodate the additional spillover queue. , LINSCoiT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 52 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield CabrIDo Town Center, Sanra Aaa\Repon\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-20224 City Council 18 — 1682 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-5 (CONTINUED) YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE CALTRANS OFF -RAMP PEAK HOUR QUEUING ANALYSIS" (1) (2) Year 2026 Cumulative Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Max. Max. Max. Max. Storage Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Min. Min. Min. Min. Provided Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Key Study Intersection (feet) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) 14. SR-55 NB Ramps at 411 Street Northbound Left -Turn 1,200' 212' Yes 194' Yes 210' Yes 193' Yes Northbound Shared Through/Le&Right-Turn 1,200' 211' Yes 190' Yes 209' Yes 190' Yes Northbound Right -Turn 700' 210' Yes 182' Yes 207' Yes 181' Yes " Queues are based on HCM 95' Percentile methodology. 1 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 53 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield CabrIDo Town Center, Sanra Aaa\Repon\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jeer Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-20224 City Council 18 — 1683 10/3/2023 9.4 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions Table 9-6 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the at the five (5) state-controlled study intersections for the Year 2045 buildout year. The first column (1) of HCM/LOS values in Table 9-6 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The second column (2) lists future Year 2045 buildout traffic conditions, without any traffic generated by the proposed Project. The third column (3) presents future forecast traffic conditions with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed Project. The fourth column (4) shows the increase in delay value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will level of service thresholds defined in this report. The fifth column (5) indicates the anticipated level of service with improvements, if any. 9.4.1 Year 2045 Buildout Traffic Conditions Review of Column (2) of Table 9-6 indicates that the intersections of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street and SR-55 NB Ramps/4th Street are forecast to operate at unacceptable LOS E and/or F in the AM and/or PM peak hour. The remaining state-controlled study intersections are forecast to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. 9.4.2 Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of columns (3) and (4) of Table 9-6 indicates that the intersections of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street and SR-55 NB Ramps/4th Street will continue to operate at unacceptable LOS E and/or F in the AM and/or PM peak hour with the addition of project traffic. The remaining state-controlled study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, with the addition of project traffic. Review of column (4) of Table 9-6 indicates that the implementation of recommended improvements at the two (2) intersections of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street and SR-55 NB Ramps/4th Street will help offset the Project's increment. Recommended improvements are discussed in Section 12.0. Additionally, queues for the I-5 SB Ramps at 4th Street, I-5 NB Ramp at 4th Street, SR-55 SB Ramps at 4th Street, and SR-55 NB Ramps at 4th Street were reviewed and the existing vehicular storage capacity is considered adequate under Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project traffic conditions. Table 9-7 presents the queueing results for the Caltrans study intersection ramps. Appendix E presents the Year 2045 HCM/LOS calculations for the state-controlled study intersections. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 54 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana 1,00 —19L I I '',hli ,-Ilk, ���-,,. (,_n r,. Sa L'il Cah II, A11 d iI_. F -d I I:A ti ii,.Alin 11 IS 1112 1", City Council 18 — 1684 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-6 YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY - CALTRANS (2) (3) (4) (1) Year 2045 Buildout Exceeds LOS Year 2045 BuildoutPlus Project Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Thresholds Traffic Conditions Time Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions (2) - 0) with Improvements HCM LOS HCM LOS Increase Yes/No HCM LOS Key Intersection Period I-5 SB On Ramp at AM 8.7 s/v A 8.9 s/v A 0.2 s/v No 2. First Street PM 9.4 s/v A C 9.0 s/v A -0.4 s/v No No I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at AM 26.5 s/v 26.5 s/v C 0.2 s/v 7. 46' street PM 27.1 s/v C 26.8 s/v C -0.3 s/v No I-5 NB Ramps at AM 8.6 s/v A 8.6 s/v A 0.0 s/v No 8. 41' Street PM 11.0 s/v B 10.9 s/v B -0.1 s/v No SR-55 SB Ramps at AM 184.6 s/v F 190.4 s/v F 5.8 s/v No 24.4 s/v C32 13. 01 Street PM 40.8 s/v D 38.9 s/v D -1.9 s/v No 28.1 s/v C SR-55 NB Ramps at AM 58.5 s/v E 57.8 s/v E -0.7 s/v No 36.9 s/v D32 14. 41b Street PM 57.3 s/v E 54.7 s/v D -2.6 s/v No 26.8 s/v C Note. Bold HCM/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the Caltrans LOS standards. s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) 32 Although the intersection is not considered a significant impact based on Caltrans criteria, level of service results at the intersection with the implementation of improvements discussed in Section 12.0 have been included for informational purposes. LiNscoTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 55 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield CabrIDo Town Center, Sanra Ana\Repon\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mined -Use Pr jeer Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-20224 City Council 18 - 1685 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-7 YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT CALTRANS OFF -RAMP PEAK HOUR QUEUING ANALYSIS" (1) (2) Year 2045 Buildout Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Max. Max. Max. Max. Storage Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Min. Min. Min. Min. Provided Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Key Study Intersection (feet) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) 7. I-5 SB On Ramp/Mabury Street at 411 street Southbound Left -Turn 288' 34 64' Yes 83' Yes 61' Yes 90' Yes Southbound Through 970' 94' Yes 90' Yes 98' Yes 93' Yes Southbound Shared Through/Right-Turn 970' 89' Yes 84' Yes 93' Yes 87' Yes 8. I-5 NB Ramps at 4", Street Northbound Left -Turn 360' 85' Yes 159' Yes 88' Yes 158' Yes 13. SR-55 SB Ramps at 40, Street SouthboundLeft -Turn 1,400' 71' Yes 308' Yes 61' Yes 312' Yes Southbound Shared LeflRight-Turn 1,400' 67' Yes 317' Yes 59' Yes 320' Yes Southbound Right -Turn 165' 66' Yes 334' Yes35 57' Yes 338' YeS35 as Queues are based on HCM 95" Percentile methodology. 34 The southbound left-tum consists of dual lanes. The first lane consists of approximately 140 feet of storage and the second lane consists of approximately 435 feet of storage. The storage reported is the average of both lanes. 35 Although the queue exceeds the right -turn storage, the ramp has the capacity to accommodate the additional spillover queue. LINscoTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 56 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield CabrIDo Town Center, Sanra Ana\Repon\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-20224 City Council 18 — 1686 10/3/2023 TABLE 9-7 (CONTINUED) YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT CALTRANS OFF -RAMP PEAK HOUR QUEUING ANALYSIS" (1) (2) Year 2045 Buildout Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Max. Max. Max. Max. Storage Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Queue/ Adequate Min. Min. Min. Min. Provided Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Key Study Intersection (feet) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) Required (Yes/No) 14. SR-55 NB Ramps at 4" Street Northbound Left -Turn 1,200' 224' Yes 205' Yes 223' Yes 204' Yes Northbound Shared Through/Le8/Right-Turn 1,200' 226' Yes 202' Yes 224' Yes 201' Yes Northbound Right -Turn 700' 228' Yes 196' Yes 225' Yes 195' Yes 30 Queues are based on HCM 95" Percentile methodology. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 57 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield CabrIDo Town Center, Sanra Aaa\Repon\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jeer Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-20224 City Council 18 — 1687 10/3/2023 10.0 DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS 10.1 Existing Plus Project Analysis Table 10-1 summarizes the daily Level of Service results at the twelve (12) key study intersections for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) in Table 10-1 presents a daily volumes and subsequent LOS based on the MPAH for existing conditions. The second column (2) presents a daily volumes and subsequent LOS based on the MPAH for existing plus project conditions. The third column (3) identifies if the daily roadway segment exceeds the thresholds identified within this report. 10.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of columns (2) and (3) of Table 10-1 indicates that all twelve (12) study segments are forecast to operate at acceptable service levels with the addition of proposed Project traffic to existing traffic. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 58 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '99 ��+pp p Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixennd--/1 Tae.�Prrpjpqrt Santa Ana City Council N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa AnlBtiart\451ria Ro Town Center Mixed -Use Project Rev1013/Yat02311-18-2022.doc TABLE 10-1 EXISTING DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (1) (2) (3) Existing Exceeds Existing Traffic Plus Project LOS Conditions Traffic Conditions Threshold Min. Daily LOS Daily LOS Yes/No Acceptable Roadway No. of KeyRoadwaySegment Jurisdiction LOS Classification Lanes Volume Volume First Street, between A. I-5 SB On-Ramp/Marbury Street and Cabrillo Park Santa Ana D Major 6 26,442 A 26,374 A No Drive First Street, between B. Santa Ana D Major 6 22,110 A 22,136 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Golden Circle Drive First Street, between C. Santa Ana D Major 6 20,088 A 20,144 A No Golden Circle Drive and Tustin Avenue Cabrillo Park Drive, between D. Xerox Centre Access Road and State Fund Access Santa Ana D Primary 4 12,143 A 12,100 A No Road Fourth Street, between E. Santa Ana D Major 6 30,042 A 30,634 A No I-5 NB Ramps and Cabrillo Park Drive Fourth Street, between F. Santa Ana D Major 6 22,635 A 23,045 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Golden Circle Drive Tustin Avenue, between Santa Ana/ G. Tustin D Major 5 16,887 A 16,904 A No First Street and Fourth Street Tustin Avenue, between H. Santa Ana D Major 6 24,911 A 25,099 A No Fourth Street and Sixth Street Cabrillo Park Drive, between I. Santa Ana D Primary 4 13,624 A 13,741 A No Fourth Street and Parkcourt Place LINScoTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 59 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 — 1689 10/3/2023 TABLE 10-1 (CONTINUED) EXISTING PLUS PROJECT DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (1) (2) (3) Existing Exceeds Existing Traffic Plus Project LOS Conditions Traffic Conditions Threshold Min. Dailye LOS Daily LOS Yes/No Acceptable Roadway No. of KeyRoadwaySegment Jurisdiction LOS Classification Lanes Volum Volume Cabrillo Park Drive, between J. Santa Ana D Primary 4 10,932 A 11,384 A No Parkcourt Place and Fruit Street Cabrillo Park Drive, between K. Santa Ana D Primary 4 9,812 A 9,976 A No Fruit Street and 17th Street Parkcourt Place, between Commuter L. Santa Ana D Street 2 1,825 A 1,934 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Fruit Street LINSCOTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 60 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 — 1690 10/3/2023 10.2 Year 2026 Traffic Conditions Table 10-2 summarizes the daily Level of Service results at the twelve (12) key study intersections for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) in Table 10-2 presents a daily volumes and subsequent LOS based on the MPAH for Year 2026 conditions. The second column (2) presents a daily volumes and subsequent LOS based on the MPAH for Year 2026 plus project conditions. The third column (3) identifies if the daily roadway segment exceeds the thresholds identified within this report. 10.2.1 Year 2026 Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of columns (2) and (3) of Table 10-2 indicates that all twelve (12) study segments are forecast to operate at acceptable service levels with the addition of proposed Project traffic to Year 2026 traffic. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 61 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Q9 t45� a�( Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixerl--I TaePrrpjprt Santa Ana City Council N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa AnitCt7pen illo Town Center Mixed -Use Project ReI9 3i'Y.02311-18-2022.doc TABLE 10-2 YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (1) (2) (3) Year 2026 Year 2026 Cumulative Exceeds Cumulative Traffic Plus Project LOS Conditions Traffic Conditions Threshold Min. Daily LOS Daily LOS Yes/No Acceptable Roadway No. of Key Roadway Segment Jurisdiction LOS Classification Lanes Volume Volume First Street, between A. I-5 SB On-Ramp/Marbury Street and Cabrillo Park Santa Ana D Major 6 32,933 A 32,865 A No Drive First Street, between B. Santa Ana D Major 6 29,723 A 29,749 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Golden Circle Drive First Street, between C. Santa Ana D Major 6 27,128 A 27,154 A No Golden Circle Drive and Tustin Avenue Cabrillo Park Drive, between D. Xerox Centre Access Road and State Fund Access Santa Ana D Primary 4 17,859 A 17,816 A No Road Fourth Street, between E. Santa Ana D Major 6 41,106 C 41,698 C No I-5 NB Ramps and Cabrillo Park Drive Fourth Street, between F. Santa Ana D Major 6 30,411 A 30,821 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Golden Circle Drive Tustin Avenue, between Santa Ana/ G. Tustin D Major 5 21,554 A 21,571 A No First Street and Fourth Street Tustin Avenue, between H. Santa Ana D Major 6 27,075 A 27,263 A No Fourth Street and Sixth Street Cabrillo Park Drive, between I. Santa Ana D Primary 4 16,983 A 17,100 A No Fourth Street and Parkcourt Place LINScoTr, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 62 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Ce—, Sams Am\R pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.do City Council 18 — 1692 10/3/2023 TABLE 10-2 (CONTINUED) YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (1) (2) (3) Year 2026 Year 2026 Cumulative Exceeds Cumulative Traffic Plus Project LOS Conditions Traffic Conditions Threshold Min. Daily LOS Daily LOS Yes/No Acceptable Roadway No. of KeyRoadwaySegment Jurisdiction LOS Classification Lanes Volume Volume Cabrillo Park Drive, between J. Santa Ana D Primary 4 13,422 A 13,874 A No Parkcourt Place and Fruit Street Cabrillo Park Drive, between K. Santa Ana D Primary 4 12,009 A 12,173 A No Fruit Street and 17th Street Parkeourt Place, between Commuter L. Santa Ana D Street 2 3,876 A 3,985 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Fruit Street LINScoTr, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 63 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Am\R pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.do City Council 18 — 1693 10/3/2023 10.3 Year 2045 Traffic Conditions Table 10-3 summarizes the daily Level of Service results at the twelve (12) key study intersections for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) in Table 10-3 presents a daily volumes and subsequent LOS based on the MPAH for Year 2045 traffic conditions. The second column (2) presents a daily volumes and subsequent LOS based on the MPAH for Year 2045 plus project conditions. The third column (3) identifies if the daily roadway segment exceeds the thresholds identified within this report. 10.3.1 Year 2045 Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of columns (2) and (3) of Table 10-3 indicates that all twelve (12) study segments are forecast to operate at acceptable service levels with the addition of proposed Project traffic to Year 2045 traffic. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 64 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NCenter Mixe1-1 Ts Proie Revised TTA. Santa Ana 11-18-2022.doc City Council 18 — 1694 10/3/2023 TABLE 10-3 YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (1) (2) (3) Year 2045 Buildout Exceeds Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project LOS Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Threshold Min. Daily LOS Daily LOS Yes/No Acceptable Roadway No. of KeyRoadwaySegment Jurisdiction LOS Classification Lanes Volume Volume First Street, between A. I-5 SB On-Ramp/Marbury Street and Cabrillo Park Santa Ana D Major 6 34,580 B 34,512 B No Drive First Street, between B. Santa Ana D Major 6 31,209 A 31,235 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Golden Circle Drive First Street, between C. Santa Ana D Major 6 28,484 A 28,510 A No Golden Circle Drive and Tustin Avenue Cabrillo Park Drive, between D. Xerox Centre Access Road and State Fund Access Santa Ana D Primary 4 18,752 A 18,709 A No Road Fourth Street, between E. Santa Ana D Major 6 43,161 C 43,753 C No I-5 NB Ramps and Cabrillo Park Drive Fourth Street, between F. Santa Ana D Major 6 31,932 A 32,342 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Golden Circle Drive Tustin Avenue, between Santa Ana/ G. Tustin D Major 5 22,632 A 22,649 A No First Street and Fourth Street Tustin Avenue, between H. Santa Ana D Major 6 28,429 A 28,617 A No Fourth Street and Sixth Street Cabrillo Park Drive, between I. Santa Ana D Primary 4 17,832 A 17,949 A No Fourth Street and Parkcourt Place 30 LINScoTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 65 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrffio Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - FatrField Cabrillo Tawn Ce— , Sams Ana\R2 pore\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 — 1695 10/3/2023 TABLE 10-3 (CONTINUED) YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (1) (2) (3) Year 2045 Buildout Exceeds Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project LOS Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Threshold Min. Daily LOS Daily LOS Yes/No Acceptable Roadway No. of KeyRoadwaySegment Jurisdiction LOS Classification Lanes Volume Volume Cabrillo Park Drive, between J. Santa Ana D Primary 4 14,093 A 14,545 A No Parkcourt Place and Fruit Street Cabrillo Park Drive, between K. Santa Ana D Primary 4 12,609 A 12,773 A No Fruit Street and 17th Street Parkcourt Place, between Commuter L. Santa Ana D Street 2 4,070 A 4,179 A No Cabrillo Park Drive and Fruit Street LINSCOTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 66 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Tawn Cen-, Sams Am\R pon\4531 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Pr Jem Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.dm City Council 18 — 1696 10/3/2023 11.0 SITE ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION EVALUATION 11.1 Site Access Vehicular access to Site A's parking structures will be provided from a right -turn in/out driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive (Driveway 1) and a right -turn in/out driveway on Fourth Street (Driveway 2), whereas access to Site B will be provided via a driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park Drive; cross vehicular access is not proposed between the two Project sites or with the adjacent commercial property to the east. Table 11-1 summarizes the intersection level of service results for the two (2) right -turn in/out Project driveways under long-term (Year 2045) traffic conditions at completion and full occupancy of the proposed Project. As shown, these key study intersections are forecast to operate at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. Appendix F presents the Year 2045 HCM/LOS calculations for the two (2) Project driveways. 11.1.1 Gap Assessment To supplement the level of service analysis, a gap analysis has been completed to determine if the existing gaps along both Cabrillo Park Drive and 4th Street are considered adequate to accommodate ingress and egress at the proposed project driveways. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed that the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete the outbound right -turn movement is 7 seconds. Table 11-2presents a summary of the gap survey performed in July 2022 for the right -turn outbound movement at the two (2) project driveways. Review of Table 11-2 shows that there are more gaps than vehicles exiting, therefore, it can be concluded that vehicles will have adequate gaps along both Cabrillo Park Drive and 4th Street when exiting the project site. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 67 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Q9 �Q+�( Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixed-1 Tae.�Prrpjpqrt Santa Ana City Council N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa An18pcn t451 [D-.�710 Town Center Mixed -Use Project RevID13/SGi02311-18-2022.doc TABLE 11-1 PROJECT DRIVEWAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS (1) Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Intersection Time Traffic Conditions HCM LOS Key Intersection Control Period Cabrillo Park Drive at One -Way AM 10.0 s/v B A. Project Driveway 1 Stop PM 11.9 s/v B Project Driveway 2 at One -Way AM 14.9 s/v B B. 41h Street Stop PM 21.6 s/v C Notes: • s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 68 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '99 ��++��pp CahrillnTnwnCenter Mixennr)-//iTae.�Prrpjpqrt Santa Ana City Council N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa An�,l(dpa 451691 Ro Town Center Mixed -Use Project Rev1013i'SGi02311-18-2022.doc TABLE 11-2 RIGHT -TURN OUT VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS Driveway 1 (Cabrillo Park Drive) Driveway 2 (4th Street) AM Peak Hour (7AM — 8AM) PM Peak Hour (5PM — 6PM) AM Peak Hour (7AM — 8AM) PM Peak Hour (5PM — 6PM) Gaps Gaps Gaps Vehicles Occurring Vehicles Occurring Vehicles Gaps Vehicles Occurring Served During Total Served During Total Served Occurring Total Served During Total Gap37 by Peak Vehicles by Peak Vehicles by During Peak Vehicles by Peak Vehicles (seconds) Gap38 Hour39 Served 40 Gap 38 Hour39 Served40 Gap 38 Hour39 Served 40 Gap 38 Hour39 Served41 7-13 1 14 14 1 33 33 1 48 48 1 18 36 14-20 2 10 20 2 20 40 2 28 56 2 13 26 21-27 3 7 21 3 12 36 3 19 57 3 10 30 > 28 4 46 184 4 26 104 4 42 168 4 38 152 Total Accommodated 239 Total Accommodated 213 Total Accommodated 329 Total Accommodated 244 Vehicles Vehicles Vehicles Vehicles 37 A gap is defined as the time interval between cars crossing the Project driveway. 38 For purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into the Project driveway is 7 seconds 39 Values are based on gap survey performed on Thursday, July 21, 2022. 40 Total Vehicles Served =(Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gans During Peak Hour) LiNscorr, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 69 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531- Fairfield Cabrillo Town Cencer, Santa Ana\Repw\4531 CabrWo Town Center Mired -Use Pr jest Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-2022.d- City Council 18 — 1699 10/3/2023 11.2 Internal Circulation Evaluation Access to Site B will be provided via a driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park Drive. Access for small service/delivery trucks (i.e. UPS, FedEx, and trash trucks) and passenger vehicles for the Project site have been evaluated. Our evaluation of the on -site circulation shown on the Project site plan was performed using the Turning Vehicle Templates, developed by Jack E. Leisch & Associates and AutoTURN for AutoCAD computer software that simulates turning maneuvers for various types of vehicles. Figure 11-1 illustrates the turning movements required of a small delivery truck (SU-30) as it accesses the site from Cabrillo Park Drive via Park Court Place. Review of Figure 11-1 shows overall the turning movements are considered adequate. 11.3 Sight Distance Evaluation At intersections and/or project driveways, a substantially clear line of sight should be maintained between the driver of a vehicle waiting at the crossroad and the driver of an approaching vehicle. Adequate time must be provided for the waiting vehicle to either cross all lanes of through traffic, cross the near lanes and turn left, or turn right, without requiring through traffic to radically alter their speed. A sight distance evaluation has been performed for both project driveways located along Cabrillo Park Drive and 4th Street. The Sight Distance Evaluation prepared for the project driveways are based on the criteria and procedures set forth by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the State's Highway Design Manual (HDM). Corner sight distance was utilized for the evaluation. Corner sight distance is defined in the Caltrans HDM to be the distance required by the driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to maneuver their vehicle and avoid an object without radically altering their speed. Line of sight for corner sight distance is to be determined from a 31/2 foot height at the location of the driver of a vehicle on a minor road to a 41/4 foot object height in the center of the approaching lane of the major road. Based on the criteria set forth in Table 405.1A of the Caltrans HDM and a posted speed limit of 35 mph on Cabrillo Park Drive, a corner sight distance of 334 feet for right -turning vehicles is required for Project Driveway 1. Based on the criteria set forth in Table 405.1A of the Caltrans HDM and a posted speed limit of 40 mph on 41h Street, a corner sight distance of 382 feet is required for right -turning vehicles at Project Driveway 2. Figures 11-2 presents the result of the sight distance evaluation for right -turning vehicles at Project Driveway 1 based on the application of the corner sight distance criteria. This figure illustrates the limited use areas. As shown, the sight lines at the proposed Project driveway are expected to be adequate as long as obstructions within the sight triangles are minimized. Figure 11-3 present the results of the sight distance evaluation for right -turning vehicles at Project Driveway 2 based on the application of the corner sight distance criteria. The figure illustrates the limited use areas. As shown, the sight lines at the proposed Project driveway are expected to be adequate as long as obstructions within the sight triangles are minimized. LiNSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 70 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '99 //�� Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixennr)--/1 Tse.�Prrns��errt Santa Ana City Council N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Art�,l(dpa 4511700o Town Center Mixed -Use Project RevID13/SGiY 2311-18-2022.doc TM LAW"--- 30.00 ,r r CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE LEGEND DESIGN SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH ENS — REQUIRED STOPPING AMDI� SIGHT DISTANCE LOOKING LEFT: 334 FEET Ll �q ��i � • � III � � � � ;'`7. It -At SOURCE: ARCHITECTS ORANGE FIGURE 11-2 &o SCALE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 1 SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS FOR RIGHT —TURNING VEHICLES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1702 10/3/2023 rl.a __. •'� � i milli a � IIINIIul��all ;l��� I I►il�� r_s �r �n �w� REM! w�tw r p- D+•• �I lrt��ynr Ill AL • •Q.• � . w s!'T'4M'�3a+ � Y�hnY2�"Y�a�"CRYS�•^ mww�r_ ag :m �aa: � — • L.l.:li �- • ♦ ♦g �j�Q� ''YO` r ��E����111�� 11 -!9 t .. — •rr�`�'�p■ \ ��w ��! 0711� I�s�1 ■ irH'�R �� - ST - fir- •..� ^+� �a�i ul�� � w- � � � � „M. SOURCE: ARCHITECTS ORANGE FIGURE 11-3 (NO SCALE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 2 SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS FOR RIGHT —TURNING VEHICLES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1703 10/3/2023 12.0 RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS For those intersections where projected traffic volumes are expected to result in unacceptable operating conditions, this report recommends (identifies) improvement measures that change the intersection geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements involve roadway widening and/or re -striping to reconfigure (add lanes) to specific approaches of a key intersection. The identified improvements are expected to: ■ improve existing traffic, Project traffic and future non -project (ambient traffic growth and cumulative project) traffic and ■ improve Levels of Service to an acceptable range and/or to pre -project conditions. 12.1 Planned Improvements The following improvements are anticipated to be implemented as part of the Central Pointe Project. As such, the following intersection improvements are planned. ■ No. 8 — I-5 NB Ramps at Fourth Street: Construct an additional westbound right -turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary, inclusive any modifications to the traffic signal phasing. ■ No. 9 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street: Construct an exclusive southbound right - turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement, which has been incorporated in the Central Pointe Project site plan as a "design feature" is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana. ■ No. 25 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Park Court Place: Install two-phase traffic signal and implement all necessary signing and striping improvements, inclusive of continental crosswalks and stop bars. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana. It is noted that the proposed Project will also be responsible for the new traffic signal on Cabrillo Park Drive at Park Court Place, inclusive improvements to Project Driveway 2 to accommodate anticipated traffic signal and signing and striping associated the construction of this access. 12.2 Recommended Improvements 12.2.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the intersection capacity analyses summarized in Tables 8-1 and 9-2 indicates that Project -related improvements necessary at one (1) study intersections under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions are as follows: ➢ No. 13 — SR-55 SB Ramps at Fourth Street: Modify the eastbound shared through/right- turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. LiNSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 71 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '99 AA Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixenr)--1 Tse.Prrns�errt Santa Ana City Council NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Art�,l(dpa 45�70f>tlo Town Center Mixed -Use Project RevID13i'Y�Y32311-18-2022.doc This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana and Caltrans. Per City requirements, the Project may be expected to pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement is consistent with the recommendation identified in the MMRP for the MEMU Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Project (August 2018), City of Santa Ana, as well as the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. It should be noted that although the intersection of Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street is forecast to operate at acceptable service levels under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions, the intersection requires improvements under future traffic conditions, as noted in Sections 12.2.2 and 12.2.3 of this report. Since the recommended improvement is located within the Project frontage, the Project may be expected to construct the following improvements and/or to paying their "fair -share" cost responsibility: ➢ No. 9 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street: Widen and provide the additional right-of- way required to construct an exclusive westbound right -turn lane with 125-feet of storage and 90-feet transition. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. Per City requirements and at the discretion of the City, the Project may be expected to pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement has been incorporated into Project site plan and is consistent with the recommendation identified in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. 12.2.2 Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the intersection capacity analyses summarized in Table 8-2 and 9-3 indicates that Project -related improvements necessary at two (2) study intersections under Year 2026 Plus Project traffic conditions are as follows: ➢ No. 9 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street: Widen and provide the additional right-of- way required to construct an exclusive westbound right -turn lane with 125-feet of storage and 90-feet transition. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. Per City requirements and at the discretion of the City, the Project may be expected to construct the following improvements and/or pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement has been incorporated into Project site plan and is consistent with the recommendation identified in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ➢ No. 13 — SR-55 SB Ramps at Fourth Street: Same as those identified in Section 12.2.1 - Modify the eastbound shared through/right-turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana and Caltrans. Per City requirements, the Project may be expected to pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 72 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Council Tnwn Center Mixer)--1 Tse.Prrnserrt Santa Ana City Council NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa AnUpll t45170 G Ro Town Center Mixed -Use Project Rev1013/202311-18-2022.doc costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement is consistent with the recommendation identified in the MMRP for the MEMU Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Project (August 2018), City of Santa Ana, as well as the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. 12.2.3 Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the intersection capacity analyses summarized in Table 8-3 and 9-4 indicates that Project -related improvements necessary at three (3) study intersections under Year 2045 Plus Project traffic conditions are as follows: ➢ No. 9 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street: Same as those identified in Section 12.2.2 — Widen and provide the additional right-of-way required to construct an exclusive westbound right -turn lane with 125-feet of storage and 90-feet transition. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. Per City requirements and at the discretion of the City, the Project may be expected to construct the following improvements and/or pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement has been incorporated into Project site plan and is consistent with the recommendation identified in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ➢ No. 13 - SR-55 SB Ramps at Fourth Street: Same as those identified in Section 12.2.1 - Modify the eastbound shared through/right-turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and/or Caltrans. Per City requirements, the Project may be expected to pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement is consistent with the recommendation identified in the MMRP for the MEMU Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Project (August 2018), City of Santa Ana, as well as the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ➢ No. 14 - SR-55 NB Ramps at Irvine Boulevard: Modify the eastbound approach to provide dual left -turn lanes and two through lanes. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and/or Caltrans. Per City requirements, the Project may be expected to pay a fair- share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement is consistent with the recommendation identified in the MMRP for the MEMU Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Project (August 2018), City of Santa Ana, as well as the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. Figure 12-1 illustrates the planned and recommended improvements at the study intersections. LiNSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 73 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '99 GG Cahrilln Tnwn Center Mixennr)--/1 Tse.�Prrns��errt Santa Ana City Council NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Art�,l(dpa 4511706o Town Center Mixed -Use Project RevID13/SGiY 2311-18-2022.doc I NTH 18 6D NP IT 40 NP 1 1 Jjj� 19 WELLINGTON 211 Al 3 PHASE 6IICC,P�HASE AVE SIGNAL \� N/S SPLIT 1-5 INS RAMPS ® CABRILLO PARK DR ® v `r 4TH ST 4TH ST q 13 14 / \ / \ FRUIT 21 © 2U P © ST ® LJyi 1 j 35 P _ PHASE � � 3 PHASE F � SIGNAL � SIGNAL SR-55 SB RAMPS ® SR-55 INS RAMPS —,-,� 4TH ST IRVNE BLVD PARK CT© 'PL•;:;::.I 4TH V ©9; �;;;•I YC. 11 ST 12 13 14 15 60 NP 40 NP - ftE TE FUN _ACCESS RO ¢ UN1R ACCESS RD - - FIRST 17 0 6D ST 1//N O O a ®A 35 O NP © �/ �/�• \1 f42 Ilk 2 PHASE � � 9CNAL CABRILLO PARK DR PARK COURT PIT KEY FIGURE 12-1 = EkISTING RECED IMPROVEMENT = VEAR 2026 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT = VEAR 2026 PLANNED IMPROVEMENT N NO SCALE = VEAR 2045 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT = PROJECT SITE PLANNED AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA ANA City Council 18 — 1707 10/3/2023 12.3 Project -Related Fair -Share Contribution The transportation impacts associated with the development of the Project were determined based on the Existing Plus Project, Year 2026 and Year 2045 Buildout traffic analyses. As summarized in Tables 8-1, 8-2, 8-3, 9-2, 9-3, and 9-4 the development of the Project is anticipated to have an impact at three (3) locations in which the Project can be expected to pay its fair share of the improvement costs. Table 12-1 presents the Project's fair -share contribution to construct the recommended improvements at the three (3) study intersections. As presented in Table 12-1, the first column (1) lists the recommended improvements at the three (3) impacted locations. The second column (2) presents a total of all intersection peak hour movements for existing conditions. The third column (3) presents Project -related added traffic volumes during AM peak hour and PM peak hour, assuming no credit for trips generated by the site's existing office building to provide a conservative estimated. The fourth column (4) presents Year 2045 Buildout traffic conditions with Project traffic. The fifth column (5) represents what percentage of total added intersection peak hour traffic is Project -related traffic. Review of Table 12-1 shows that the proposed Project fair -share cost responsibility at the three (3) study intersections ranges between 3.95% and 11.98%, if no credit for trips generated by the site's existing office building is taken into consideration. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 74 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 /-+ 9 p Cabrillo Town Center Mixed-i J-,p Project Santa Ana City Council N:\4500\2224531- Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa A.11(dpa 45117C®4RoTown Center lyfixed-UseProJectR, �,0/3/02311-18-2022.doc TABLE 12-1 YEAR 2045 BUILDOUT PROJECT FAIR -SHARE COST CONTRIBUTION (4) Year 2045 (5) (2) (3) Buildout Project City/ Time (1) Existing Project Plus Project Fair -Share Key Intersection Jurisdiction Period Improvement Description Traffic Traffic41 Traffic Percent42 Cabrillo Park Drive at AM ' Widen to provide a westbound right- 9' Fourth Street Santa Ana PM turn lane. 3,426 187 4,987 o 11.98 /o SR-55 SB Ramps at Santa Ana/ AM ' Modify the eastbound shared 3,211 63 4,289 5.84% 13. Fourth Street Caltrans PM through/right-turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. SR-55 NB Ramps at Tustin/ AM ' Modify the eastbound approach to 3,242 42 4,304 3.95% 14. Fourth Street Caltrans PM provide dual left -turn lanes and two through lanes. 41 Represents added Project -related traffic volumes without credit for the trips generated by the existing office site to calculate the Project's fair -share percentage contribution 42 Project fair -share percentage Colorful (4) = [Column (2)] / [Column (3) - Column (1)]. LiNscorr, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers 75 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project, Santa Ana NA4500\2224531- Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Serve Ana\Report\4531 CabrWo Town Center MixedUsePr jeer Revised TIA, Santa Ana 11-18-20224 City Council 18 — 1709 10/3/2023 13.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ■ Project Description — The Project site is a 8.97±-acre rectangular -shaped parcel of land within the Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone that is generally located north of Fourth Street and east of Cabrillo Park Drive in the City of Santa Ana, California. The Project site has an existing zoning of Professional (P) and is identified with a "Village Center District" designation in the MEMU Overlay Zone. The subject property is currently developed with four (4) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 173,025 square -feet (SF) of floor area and approximately 617 surface parking spaces. Vehicular access to the Project site is currently provided via two (2) right -turn only driveways on Fourth Street, one (1) right -turn only driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive, and a full access driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park Drive; No cross vehicular access is now provided with the adjacent commercial property to the east. The proposed Project will include the development of up to 507 residential apartment/townhomes units with a total of 1,028 parking spaces. Site "A" is proposed as five - story apartment podium with up 449 apartment homes consisting of 23 studio units, 264 one - bedroom units, 148 two -bedroom units, and 14 two-bedroom/live-work units, and 5,800 square - feet (SF) of ground floor retail space and 11,400 SF of live/work commercial/office space (estimated at 814 SF per live -work unit) "wrapped" around a six -level parking structure with a total of roughly 898 parking spaces. On -site facilities/amenities for residents of the Site "A include 6,100 SF of commercial space that would be dedicated to the leasing office, mailroom and co -work space and business center, a lounge/lobby, pool/spa, and a fitness center for residents, and courtyards. Site "B" is proposed as residential townhome community consisting of three-story townhomes with a total of 58 units and parking supply of 127 spaces consisting of garage spaces and surface parking. On -site facilities/amenities of the Site "B includes open space/courtyards. Although not counted as a part of the Project's parking supply, an additional 23 on -street parking spaces will be provided on Park Court Place. Vehicular access to Site A's parking structures will be provided from a proposed "right -turn in/right-turn out" driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive (Driveway 1) and a proposed "right -turn in/right-turn out" driveway on Fourth Street (Driveway 2) , whereas access to Site B will be provided via a "full access" driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park Drive; No cross vehicular access is proposed between the two Project sites or with the adjacent commercial property to the east. ■ Study Scope — The following twenty-five (25) key study intersections were selected for detailed peak hour level of service analyses under Existing Traffic Conditions, Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions, Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Conditions, Year 2026 Cumulative plus Project, Year 2045 Buildout Traffic Conditions, and Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions. Key Study Intersections 1. Elk Lane at First Street (Santa Ana) 2. I-5 SB On -Ramp at First Street (Santa Ana/Caltrans) 14. SR-55 NB Ramps at 4 h Street (Tustin/Caltrans) 15. Yorba Street at 4th Street (Tustin) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 76 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '//�� en // , Santa Ana City Co u n d I N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa AnaE4artM51�C1Go Town Center Mixed -Use Protect Rev1013/s2,0 11-18-2022.doc 3. Cabrillo Park Drive at First Street (Santa Ana) 4. Golden Circle Drive at First Street (Santa Ana) 5. Tustin Avenue at First Street (Tustin) 6. Yorba Street at First Street (Tustin) 7. I-5 SB On-Ramp/Mabury Street at 4' Street (Santa Ana/Caltrans) 8. I-5 NB Ramps at 4" Street (Santa Ana/Caltrans) 9. Cabrillo Park Drive at 4th Street (Santa Ana) 10. Golden Circle Drive at 4th Street (Santa Ana) 11. Park Center Drive at 4th Street (Santa Ana) 12. Tustin Avenue at 4th Street (Santa Ana) 13. SR-55 SB Ramps at 41h Street (Santa Ana/Caltrans) 16. Cabrillo Park Drive at State Fund Access Road (Santa Ana) 17. Cabrillo Park Drive at Xerox Center Access Road (Santa Ana) 18. Cabrillo Park Drive at 17t' Street (Santa Ana) 19. Cabrillo Park Drive at Wellington Avenue (Santa Ana) 20. Tustin Avenue at Wellington Avenue (Santa Ana) 21. Mabury Street at Fruit Street (Santa Ana) 22. Cabrillo Park Drive at Fruit Street (Santa Ana) 23. Park Center Drive at Fruit Street (Santa Ana) 24. Tustin Avenue at Fruit Street (Santa Ana) 25. Cabrillo Park Drive at Park Court Place (Santa Ana) Existing Traffic Conditions — Twenty-four (24) of the twenty-five key study intersections currently operate at an acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4' Street currently operates at unacceptable LOS E during the AM peak hour. Project Trip Generation — The existing office building generates 1,876 daily trips, with 263 trips (231 inbound, 32 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 249 trips (42 inbound, 207 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a "typical" weekday. The proposed Project, after application of a 5% internal capture rate, is forecast to generate 2,751 daily trips, with 213 trips (66 inbound, 147 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 249 trips (141 inbound, 108 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a "typical" weekday. A comparison of the proposed Project's trip generation to that of the Existing Land Use indicates that the Project will result in 875 more daily trips, 50 fewer AM peak hour trips and 0 more PM peak hour trips. Related Projects Traffic Characteristics — Thirty-seven (37) related projects were considered as part of the cumulative background setting. The thirty-seven (37) related projects are forecast to generate 50,043 daily trips, with 3,338 trips (1,378 inbound, 1,960 outbound) anticipated during the AM peak hour and 4,098 trips (2,266 inbound, 1,832 outbound) produced during the PM peak hour. ■ Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions — The twenty-five (25) study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of project traffic to existing traffic. ■ Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Conditions Plus Project — Two (2) of the twenty-five (25) study intersections will operate at unacceptable service levels during the PM peak hour. The remaining LINSCUTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 77 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 ,� en // , Santa Ana City Co u n d I N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa AnII8Pcrtt4511�Ibr1110 Town Center Mixed -Use Project Rev1013/s2,0 11-18-2022.doc study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersections forecast to operate adversely consist of the following: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Key Intersection ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS 1. Elk Lane at First Street - - 0.946 E 9. Cabrillo Park Drive at 4t'' Street - - 0.907 E Although the intersection of Elk Lane/First Street operates adversely during the PM peak hour, the proposed Project adds less than 0.010 increment to the ICU value and is therefore does not require recommended improvements based on the LOS standards and criteria specified in this report. Additionally, Cabrillo Park Drive/4th Street exceeds the level of service thresholds and requires Project -related improvements. However, the implementation of recommended improvements at this study intersection will help offset the Project's increment. ■ Year 2045 Buildout Traffic Conditions Plus Project — Three (3) of the twenty-five (25) study intersections will operate at unacceptable service levels during the PM peak hour. The remaining study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersections forecast to operate adversely consist of the following: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Key Intersection ICU/HCM LOS ICU/I-ICM LOS 1. Elk Lane at First Street 0.990 E 9. Cabrillo Park Drive at 40' Street 0.949 E 12. Tustin Avenue at 4t' Street - 0.924 E Although the intersection of Elk Lane/First Street and Tustin Avenue/4th Street operates adversely during the PM peak hour, the proposed Project adds less than 0.010 increment to the ICU value and is therefore does not require recommended improvements based on the LOS standards and criteria specified in this report. Additionally, Cabrillo Park Drive/4th Street exceeds the level of service thresholds and requires Project -related improvements. However, the implementation of recommended improvements at this study intersection will help offset the Project's increment. ■ Caltrans Existing Traffic Conditions— The intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street currently operates at unacceptable LOS F in the AM peak hour. The remaining state-controlled study intersections currently operate at LOS C or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. ■ Caltrans Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions — The intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/Th Street will continue to operate at unacceptable LOS F in the AM peak hour with the addition of project traffic. The remaining state-controlled study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, with the addition of LINSCUTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 78 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 en // , Santa Ana City Co u n d I NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa A.18l,,IM511C12o Town Center Mixed -Use Project Rev1013/s2,0 11-18-2022.doc project traffic. The implementation of recommended improvements at the intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street will help offset the Project's increment. Additionally, queues for the I-5 SB Ramps at 4th Street, I-5 NB Ramp at 4th Street, SR-55 SB Ramps at 4th Street, and SR-55 NB Ramps at 4th Street were reviewed and the existing vehicular storage capacity is considered adequate under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. ■ Caltrans Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions - The intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street will continue to operate at unacceptable LOS F in the AM peak hour with the addition of project traffic. The remaining state-controlled study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, with the addition of project traffic. The implementation of recommended improvements at the intersection of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street will help offset the Project's increment. Additionally, queues for the I-5 SB Ramps at 4th Street, I-5 NB Ramp at 4th Street, SR-55 SB Ramps at 4th Street, and SR-55 NB Ramps at 4th Street were reviewed and the existing vehicular storage capacity is considered adequate under Year 2026 Plus Project traffic conditions. Caltrans Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions - The intersections of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street and SR-55 NB Ramps/4th Street will continue to operate at unacceptable LOS E and/or F in the AM and/or PM peak hour with the addition of project traffic. The remaining state-controlled study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, with the addition of project traffic. The implementation of recommended improvements at the two (2) intersections of SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street and SR- 55 NB Ramps/4th Street will help offset the Project's increment. Additionally, queues for the I-5 SB Ramps at 4th Street, I-5 NB Ramp at 4th Street, SR-55 SB Ramps at 4th Street, and SR-55 NB Ramps at 4th Street were reviewed and the existing vehicular storage capacity is considered adequate under Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project traffic conditions. Daily Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions - All twelve (12) study segments are forecast to operate at acceptable service levels with the addition of proposed Project traffic to existing traffic. Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions - All twelve (12) study segments are forecast to operate at acceptable service levels with the addition of proposed Project traffic to Year 2026 traffic. ■ Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions - All twelve (12) study segments are forecast to operate at acceptable service levels with the addition of proposed Project traffic to Year 2045 traffic. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 79 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 Council '+ /q q, Santa Ana City Co u n ci I N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa A4l8tort ,1511113o Town Center Mixed -Use Project R ICU i2��0 gill 1 � ?tn ■ Project Site Access — The proposed Project driveways are forecast to operate at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour under Year 2045 Buildout traffic conditions. Additionally, a gap analysis has been completed which concluded that vehicles will have adequate gaps along both Cabrillo Park Drive and 4th Street when exiting the project site. ■ Planned Improvements — The following intersection improvements are anticipated to be implemented as part of the Central Pointe Project. As such, the following intersection improvements are planned. ➢ No. 8 — I-5 NB Ramps at Fourth Street: Construct an additional westbound right -turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary, inclusive any modifications to the traffic signal phasing. ➢ No. 9 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street: Construct an exclusive southbound right - turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement, which has been incorporated in the Central Pointe site plan as a "design feature" is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana. ➢ No. 25 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Park Court Place: Install two-phase traffic signal and implement all necessary signing and striping improvements, inclusive of continental crosswalks and stop bars. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana. It is noted that the proposed Project will also be responsible for the new traffic signal on Cabrillo Park Drive at Park Court Place, inclusive improvements to Project Driveway 2 to accommodate anticipated traffic signal and signing and striping associated the construction of this access. ■ Existing Plus Project Recommended Improvements —The following intersection improvements are recommended to mitigate the impacts of the proposed Project under these conditions. ➢ No. 13 — SR-55 SB Ramps at Fourth Street: Modify the eastbound shared through/right- turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana and Caltrans. Per City requirements, the Project may be expected to pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement is consistent with the recommendation identified in the MMRP for the MEMU Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Project (August 2018), City of Santa Ana, as well as the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. It should be noted that although the intersection of Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street is forecast to operate at acceptable service levels under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions, the intersection requires improvements under future traffic conditions, as noted in Sections 12.2.2 and 12.2.3 of this report. Since the recommended improvement is located within the Project LINSCUTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 80 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '99 AA end/ �n , Santa Ana City Co u n d I NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa An�,4attM5117C14o Town Center Mixed -Use Protect Rev1013/s2,0 11-18-2022.doc frontage, the Project may be expected to construct the following improvements and/or to paying their "fair -share" cost responsibility: ➢ No. 9 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street: Widen and provide the additional right-of- way required to construct an exclusive westbound right -turn lane with 125-feet of storage and 90-feet transition. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. Per City requirements and at the discretion of the City, the Project may be expected to pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement has been incorporated into Project site plan and is consistent with the recommendation identified in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ■ Year 2026 Cumulative Plus Project Recommended Improvements -The following intersection improvements are recommended to mitigate the impacts of the proposed Project under these conditions. ➢ No. 9 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street: Widen and provide the additional right-of- way required to construct an exclusive westbound right -turn lane with 125-feet of storage and 90-feet transition. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. Per City requirements and at the discretion of the City, the Project may be expected to construct the following improvements and/or pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement has been incorporated into Project site plan and is consistent with the recommendation identified in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ➢ No. 13 — SR-55 SB Ramps at Fourth Street: Modify the eastbound shared through/right- turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana and Caltrans. Per City requirements, the Project may be expected to pay a fair-share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement is consistent with the recommendation identified in the MMRP for the MEMU Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Project (August 2018), City of Santa Ana, as well as the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ■ Year 2045 Buildout Plus Project Recommended Improvements - The following intersection improvements are recommended to mitigate the impacts of the proposed Project under these conditions. ➢ No. 9 — Cabrillo Park Drive at Fourth Street: Same as those identified in Section 12.2.2 - Widen and provide the additional right-of-way required to construct an exclusive westbound right -turn lane with 125-feet of storage and 90-feet transition. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. Per City requirements and at the discretion of the City, the Project may be expected to construct the following improvements and/or pay a fair-share/local fee to LINSCUTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 81 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 GG en // , Santa Ana City Co u n d I NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa A.1F8p11t45117C1f*io Town Center Mixed -Use Protect Rev1013/s2,0 11-18-2022.doc cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement has been incorporated into Project site plan and is consistent with the recommendation identified in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ➢ No. 13 — SR-55 SB Ramps at Fourth Street: Modify the eastbound shared through/right- turn lane to construct a free -right turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and/or Caltrans. Per City requirements, the Project may be expected to pay a fair- share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement is consistent with the recommendation identified in the MMRP for the MEMU Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Project (August 2018), City of Santa Ana, as well as the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ➢ No. 14 — SR-55 NB Ramps at Irvine Boulevard: Modify the eastbound approach to provide dual left -turn lanes and two through lanes. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. This improvement is subject to the review and approval of the City of Santa Ana, City of Tustin and/or Caltrans. Per City requirements, the Project may be expected to pay a fair- share/local fee to cover the Project's fair share of the full construction costs needed to implement these mitigation measures. This improvement is consistent with the recommendation identified in the MMRP for the MEMU Overlay District Expansion and Elan Development Project (August 2018), City of Santa Ana, as well as the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. ■ Project -Related Fair -Share Contribution — The proposed Project results in negative trips at the three (3) study intersections when considering the trip generation of the site's existing office buildings, and therefore, the percentage of net traffic impact has been identified as 0.00%. However, when no credit for trips generated by the site's existing office building is taken, the proposed Project fair -share cost responsibility at the three (3) study intersections ranges between 3.95% and 11.98%, as shown below. Project Fair - City/ Share Key Intersection Jurisdiction Contribution Cabrillo Park Drive at 9. Santa Ana 11.98% Fourth Street SR-55 SB Ramps at Santa Ana/ 13. 5.84% Fourth Street Caltrans SR-55 NB Ramps at Tustin/ 14. ° 3.95 /o Fourth St/Irvine Blvd Caltrans LINSCUTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 82 LLG Ref. 2-22-4531-1 '99 cc end/ �n , Santa Ana City Co u n d I NA4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa AnaE4artM5117 6o Town Center Mixed -Use Project Rev1013/s20 11-18-2022.doc SCREENING MEMORANDUM To: Ed McCoy, Senior Vice President -Development Date: June 27, 2023 engineers Fairfield Residential/FRH Realty, LLC Dave Rand, Partner Engineers & Planners Rand Paster Nelson, LLP Traffic From: Richard E. Barretto, P.E., Principal LLG Ref: 2.22.4531.1 Transportation Shane Green, P.E., Senior Transportation Engineer Parking Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers Linscott. Law & Greenspan, Engineers Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment for the 2 Executive Circle Subject: Proposed Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project Suite 250 1901 E. 4th Street, Santa Ana, CA Irvine, CA 92614 949.825.6175 T As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this 949.825.5939 F volunteered Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment Memorandum www•ligengineers.com submitted for informational purposes only and not for the purposes of evaluating transtransportation impacts under CE A for the Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project p p Q � Pasadena Irvine (hereinafter referred to as Project) in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, San Diego California. This Screening Memorandum presents the VMT screening criteria, analysis methodology and the conclusion. It should be noted that the approach and methodology outlined in this Screening Memorandum is consistent with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019), which provides additional detail on the language and analysis procedures described in this Screening Memorandum. The following sections of this Screening Memorandum summarize the Project description, present City of Santa Ana's VMT screening criteria, analysis methodology and conclusion. PROTECT DESCRIPTION F,xistine Prniect The Project site is a 8.97±-acre rectangular -shaped parcel of land within the Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone that is generally located north of Fourth Street and east of Cabrillo Park Drive in the City of Santa Ana, California. The Philip M. Linscott, PE (1924-2000) Project site has an existing zoning of Professional (P) and is identified with a William A. Law, PE (1921-20181 "Village Center District" designation in the MEMU Overlay Zone. Jack M. Greenspan, PE (Retl Paul W. Wilkinson, PE (Rat.) The subject property is currently developed with four (4) three-story office buildings John P. Keating, PE (Rat.) with a total floor area of 173,025 square -feet (SF) of floor area and approximately David S. Shender, PE 617 surface parking spaces. The northern half of the Project site, addressed at 515 — John A. Boarman, PE Clare M. Look -Jaeger, PE (Rot.) 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, is developed with two (2) three-story office buildings with a Richard E. Barretto, PE total floor area of 92,115 SF, whereas the southern half, addressed at 1907 — 1971 E. Keil B. Maberry, PE Kalyan C. Yallapu, PE Dave Roseman, PE nkar Ramakrishnan, PE City Council 18 — 1717 10/3/2023LG2WB Company Founded 1966 Ed McCoy Dave Rand June 27, 2023 Page 2 Fourth Street, is developed with two (2) three-story office buildings with a total floor area of 80,910 SF. Vehicular access to the Project site is currently provided via two (2) right -turn only driveways on Fourth Street, one (1) right -turn only driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive, and a full access driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park Drive; No cross vehicular access is now provided with the adjacent commercial property to the east. See Figure 1, a Vicinity Map that illustrates the general location of the Project and surrounding street system. Figure 2 is an existing aerial photograph of the Project site. The proposed Project will include the development of up to 507 residential apartment/townhomes units with a total of 1,025 parking spaces. Site "A" is proposed as five -story apartment podium with up 449 apartment homes consisting of 23 studio units, 264 one -bedroom units, 148 two -bedroom units, and 14 two-bedroom/live- work units, and 5,800 square -feet (SF) of ground floor retail space and 11,400 SF of live/work commercial/office space (estimated at 814 SF per live -work unit) "wrapped" around a six -level parking structure with a total of roughly 898 parking spaces. On -site facilities/amenities for residents of Site "A include 6,100 SF of commercial space that would be dedicated to the leasing office, mailroom and co - work space and business center, lobby/lounge, pool/spa, and a fitness center for residents, and courtyards. Site "B" is proposed as residential townhome community consisting of three-story townhomes with a total of 58 units and parking supply of 127 spaces consisting of garage spaces and surface parking. On -site facilities/amenities of the Site `B includes open space/courtyards. Although not counted as a part of the Project's parking supply, an additional 23 on -street parking spaces will be provided on Park Court Place. The Project is expected to be constructed and completed by Year 2026. Table 1 provides a summary of the proposed Project components. Figure 3 presents the proposed Site Plan, prepared by AO Architects. It should be noted that the northeast curb at Cabrillo Park Drive and Fourth Street has been modified to allow for southbound U-turn movements. Further, the proposed Site Plan illustrates the implications of the construction of a westbound right -turn lane on Fourth Street at Cabrillo Park Drive, which is identified as a recommended improvements in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. Vehicular access to Site A's parking structures will be provided from a proposed "right -turn in/right-turn out" driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive (Driveway 1) and a proposed "right -turn in/right-turn out" driveway on Fourth Street (Driveway 2), City Council 18 — 1718 10/3/2023 Ed McCoy Dave Rand June 27, 2023 Page 3 whereas access to Site B will be provided via a "full access" driveway located opposite Park Court Place at Cabrillo Park; No cross vehicular access is proposed between the two Project sites or with the adjacent commercial property to the east. It is noted that an easterly driveway on Fourth Street, identified as a "Paseo/Service Lane", is also planned to be provided and will be used as access for "move -ins" and service/trash trucks as well as emergency vehicles. Pedestrian circulation for the proposed Project would be provided via existing public sidewalks along Park Court Place, Cabrillo Park Drive, and 41h Street within the vicinity of the Project. The existing sidewalk system within the Project vicinity provides direct connectivity to the existing development located along major thoroughfares. Public transit bus service for the Project site is adequate and is provided in the Project area by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). OCTA is the leading transit provider in Orange County and offers a wide range of fixed -route bus services. OCTA has developed an extensive network of transit routes to connect residents and commuters of Santa Ana to key destinations. Four (4) OCTA bus routes operate within the vicinity of the project site on First Street, 4th Street, 17th Street, and Tustin Avenue, which consists of the following: ■ OCTA Route 60: The major routes of travel include 17th Street and Tustin Avenue. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on 17th Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the northwest and southwest corners. Route 60 operates on approximate 20-minute headways during weekdays and 15-minute headways on weekends. ■ OCTA Route 64: The major route of travel is First Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on First Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the southeast and northwest corners. Route 64 operates on approximate 15-minute headways on the weekdays and 20-minutes on the weekends. There are 8 stops located along Route 64 that are within t/2 mile of the site. ■ OCTA Route 71: The major route of travel is Tustin Avenue. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on Tustin Avenue at 4th Street in the northeast and southwest corners. Route 71 operates on approximate 50-minute headways on the weekdays and 45-minute headways on the weekends. City Council 18 — 1719 10/3/2023 Ed McCoy Dave Rand June 27, 2023 Page 4 ■ OCTA Route 463: The major route of travel is 41h Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops located on 4th Street at Cabrillo Park Drive in the northeast and southeast corners. Route 463 operates on approximate 25-minute headways on the weekdays and no bus service on the weekends. Furthermore, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority also provides commuter and passenger rail service to Santa Ana. The Metrolink Orange County Line and the Inland Empire -Orange County commuter lines travel through Santa Ana, with stops at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center. Amtrak's Pacific Surfliner also provides passenger rail service through Santa Ana, connecting residents and commuters of Santa Ana to neighboring communities throughout Southern California such as Los Angeles and San Diego counties. Figure 4 graphically illustrates the transit routes of OCTA within the vicinity of the project. Figure S identifies the locations of the existing bus stops in proximity to the Project site. Project screening is used to determine if a project will be required to conduct a detailed VMT analysis. The following section discusses the various screening methods outlined in the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019), and outlines whether the Project will screen -out, either in its entirety or partially, based on individual land uses. The City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019) states that several types of projects can be screened out from a VMT assessment using the criteria below, indicating that these projects have the potential to reduce VMT per service population (VMT/SP) and result in a less -than -significant transportation impact: o Projects which serve the local community and have the potential to reduce VMT, such as neighborhood K-12 schools and local -serving retail less than 50, 000 sq. ft. (Charter schools are excluded from this criteria). Based on the above, the Project's retail component will screen out since it has local -serving retail of less than 50,000 SF. o Projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips. Based on the above and as presented in Table 2, the Project will noscreen out since it will generate more than 110 net daily trips. City Council 18 — 1720 10/3/2023 Ed McCoy Dave Rand June 27, 2023 Page 5 o Projects located within TPA. Appendix A of the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019) presents the transit priority areas in the City of Santa Ana. Due to the many high quality transit routes in the City, much of the City is a transit priority area. o TPA are defined as a % mile radius around an existing or planned major transit stop (e.g., Metrolink Station, Streetcar Station, etc.) or an existing stop along a high quality transit corridor. o High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs) are defined as a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A map of HQTAs can be reviewed on SCAG's website'. o Please note that projects that are in TPAs will also be required to complete a secondary screening step to verify the proposed project's consistency with the assumptions from the RTPISCS. This consistency can be a land use review (e.g., are the proposed land uses already included in the RTPISCS) or can be reviewed from a VMTISP perspective (e.g., does the resulting land use increase or decrease the VMT/SP in the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) compared to the RTPISCS assumptions). SCAG has identified High Quality Transit Areas in the SCAG region. According to the SCAG GIS data, the Project is located within an existing High -Quality Transit Area (HQTA) in 2016 as shown in Figure 6, and hence it can be concluded that the Project is located within a TPA. It should be noted that the Project site is located within a'/z mile of a HQTA (i.e. a stop located on a single corridor with 15 minute peak hour service or better). As mentioned previously OCTA Route 64 has 8 stops located within a %2 mile of the Project. Further, the land use is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) as contained in Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) adopted Connect SoCal (2024 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy; Draft May 2022)). Figure 7 and Figure 8 are the SCAG Data/Map Book land use designations. ' https:Hgisdata-scag.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/SCAG::high-quality-transit-areas-hqta-2016-scag- region/explore?location=33.915387%2C-118.359931 %2C 11.56 City Council 18 — 1721 10/3/2023 Ed McCoy Dave Rand June 27, 2023 Page 6 The Project is consistent with the land uses in the RTP/SCS, which assumed the site would be constructed as an urban, mixed use development that would reduce area VMT, consistent with the TPA designation. Connect SoCal recognizes that development within Priority Growth Areas, including TPAs, supports mode shift and shortened trip distances. The Project site is within an identified Priority Growth Area, where urban development can contribute to reduced VMT and associated emissions. The District Center designation permits broad use types, including commercial, retail, hospitality, residential, and office uses that facilitate high intensity development with an urban character. The Project proposes diverse uses consistent with those permitted by the General Plan — residential, and local serving retail and commercial uses — and would implement development to achieve an urban character and is consistent with the land uses assumed for the project site as part of the RTP/SCS. In addition, the Project's consistency has been evaluated with applicable goals and policies of the City's General Plan Circulation Element, including: o Polite: Coordinate transportation improvements in a manner which minimizes disruptions to the community. o Polite: Utilize advance technology to improve traffic flow and minimize the need for land acquisition. o PoliT: Maintain at least a level of service "D " on arterial street intersections, except in major development areas. o Polite: Improve intersection capacity on major arterials to accommodate increased traffic demands. o Polite: Continue design practices which facilitate the safe use of circulation systems. o Policy Support the efforts of regional, state, and federal agencies to enhance local and express bus services. o Policy Support programs which complement bus and rail services for specialized transit needs. o Polite: Support the expansion of commuter rail services. City Council 18 — 1722 10/3/2023 Ed McCoy Dave Rand June 27, 2023 Page 7 o Polite: Encourage the development of multi -modal transit opportunities within major development areas. o Polite: Enhance sidewalks and pedestrian systems to promote their use as a means of travel. Furthermore, SCAG's Connect SoCal 2020-2045 RTP/SCS integrates strategies for land use and transportation centered around sustainability, protecting and preserving existing transportation infrastructure, increasing capacity through improved systems managements, and providing more transportation choices, in order to help reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation. The City's General Plan consistency, and thus the Project's consistency, with the RTP/SCS can be evaluated based on the following applicable goals2: o RTP/SCS GI: Encourage regional economic prosperity and global competitiveness. o RTP/SCS G2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability, and travel safety for people and goods. o RTP/SCS G3: Enhance the preservation, security, and resilience of the regional transportation system. o RTP/SCS G4: Increase person and good movement and travel choices within the transportation system. o RTP/SCS G5: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality. o RTP/SCS G6: Support healthy and equitable communities. o RTP/SCS G7: Adapt to a changing climate and support an integrated regional development pattern and transportation network. o RTP/SCS G8: Leverage new transportation technologies and data - driven solutions that result in more efficient travel. 2 Source: City of Santa Ana General Plan Update, Table 5.10-1. Attached at the end of this letter are excerpts from the General Plan. City Council 18 — 1723 10/3/2023 Ed McCoy Dave Rand June 27, 2023 Page 8 Hence, given the above, the Project will screen out since itis_within a TPA (HQTA), as illustrated in Figure 6, where existing transit service provided by OCTA currently provides service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during the peak commute hours. The Project's proximity to public transit is discussed in detail in the preceding section. Consistent with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019) and based on the VMT screening methodology and findings outlined in this Screening Memorandum, the proposed Project is located within a TPA (HQTA), based on the sites location within '/2 mile of the 8 bus stop along OCTA Route 64 that has a 15 minute peak hour service or better as shown in Figure 6 and the land use is consistent with the RTP/SCS as contained in Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) adopted Connect SoCal (2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy). Therefore, in accordance with the City of Santa Ana's guidelines, the proposed Project is exempt from the preparation of any further VMT analysis and may be presumed to have a less than significant CEQA-related transportation impact. * * * * * * * * * * * We appreciate the opportunity to provide this Technical Memorandum. Should you have any questions regarding the memorandum, please contact us at (949) 825-6175. cc: File City Council 18 — 1724 10/3/2023 TABLE 1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Land Use / Project Description Project Development Totals Cahrillo Town Center Mired Use ❑ Site A: 5-Story Wrap 0 Studio Units (600 SF) 23 Units (5.1%) 0 1 Bedroom Units (750 SF) 264 Units (58.8%) o 2 Bedroom Units (1,070 SF) 148 Units (33.0%) o Live -Work / 2 Bedroom Units (1,200 SF) 14 Units (3.1 %) Total Apartment Units: 449 Units ❑ Site A: Commercial o Retail 5,800 SF o Live/Work Commercial 11,400 SF Total Commercial Space: 17,200 SF ❑ Site B: 3-Story Townhomes 58 units o Total Residential Units: 507 Units Parking Supply ❑ Site A — Parking Structure o Resident Parking 808 spaces o Retail/Commercial/Guest Parking 90 _spaces Site A Parking Supply: 898 spaces ❑ Site B o Resident - two -car Garage per unit 116 spaces o Resident/Guest — Open Parking 11 spaces Site B Parking Supply: 127 spaces Total Parking Supply: 1,025 spaces City Council 18 — 1725 10/3/2023 TABLE 2 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES AND FORECASTS Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Description 2-Way Trip Rates ■ 215: Single Family Attached Housing 7.20 31 % 69% 0.48 57% 43% 0.57 (TE/DU) ■ 221: Multifamily Housing — Mid -Rise 4.54 23% 77% 0.37 61% 39% 0.39 (TE/DU) • 710: General Office Building 10.84 88% 12% 1.52 17% 83% 1.44 (TE/1000 SF) • 822: Strip Retail Plaza (< 40k) 54.45 60% 40% 2.36 50% 50% 6.59 (TE/1000 SF) Existing Land Use Trip Generation_ • Cabrillo Park Drive and E. Fourth Office Buildings (173,025 SF) Generation. 1,876 231 32 263 42 207 249 Project Trip ■ Cabrillo Town Center Apartments (449 DU) 2,038 38 128 166 107 68 175 ■ Cabrillo Town Center Retail (5,800 SF) 316 8 6 14 19 19 38 • Cabrillo Town Center L/W Commercial (11,400 SF) 124 15 2 17 3 13 16 • Cabrillo Town Center Townhomes (58 DU) 418 9 19 28 19 14 33 Total Project Trip Generation: 2,896 70 155 225 148 114 262 Internal Trip Capture (5%) -145 -4 -8 -12 -7 -6 -13 Adjusted Project Trip Generation 2,751 66 1 147 213 141 108 249 Proposed Project vs. Existing Land Use Trip Generation Comparison +875 -165 +115 -50 +99 -99 0 Notes" TE/1000 SF = Trip End per 1,000 Square Feet of Gross Floor Area TE/DU = Trip End per Dwelling Unit Source: Trip Generation, I I1h Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2021). City Council 18 — 1726 10/3/2023 Popeyes 17th St Q Louisiana Kitchen `►' 17th St z z ct � a £ n b a D a :3 E isrry E 151A sl a E 141h A E 141h St vvenay s of 18 wens cargo aanK rarmer uoys V m � El Polio Loco Q • 17th St Navy Federal Starbucks Q Credit Union Superior Grocers P Q E 161h S1 Alberlsons ® © 4 Ross Dress for Less Little Caesars Pizza F. 15m St d Q Black Angus Steakhouse Q a` N Jack in the Box W a e o ? ElTorito4 17thSt 19Citibank 1 v Enderle Center © Belacan Grill - Q CVS Malaysian Bistro The Crab Cooker 90 V� Vandettt�� via U naio Art via Cadma Fie51 a Wsv E Wash Inglon Ave 1 g H z • EWellinglori Ave Z 3 u C c y P 1 _ a EWMlrnglon Ave = v z d © n z J Q ro undo Ave i Wellington Avg • Qj � 3 st _ Redwoods Homeowners O Orange County © 'v ? Association v Global MedicalCenier 0 No evdoa,kat P�2 glud z < 0 1 O Cr AhaF r9°S1 21aburyPark © Q © °© A 4 Purw Or R EHun St • • Errwl St • EFrua Sito i kF Lake Dianne Apartments q z Y " Village Cabrillo Park Apartments .9 9 c _ _ ? Q Am3gon ael Wnv e � © E 6m p .-Arm n Red Cross n a E 6th Sr o:..:.........T ro $}iSI>f}R ation Center 3 Z a�::........:......IIi a v Helen Estock E 611t Sr rslh.t tL Elementary School z ................. I h G w 2 r m 2:::::j %•j �'•''�. Vmawnell Avr ' n c -�lnk Together4 The UPS Store r' Chevron ^ 8 a California Department o mej is De Anda O of Tr g P Cation... g 10 _ 11 Q 13 0 14 15 :4th Si E 41h St E 4th S1 • •Q • Consul do de flexico ® • rQ Oel taus • Irvinelivd • f ® r 16 Encompass Health 0 St. Joseph Heritage ©Rehabilitation Hospital... ne Our Lady of Guadalupe t • M di I G S t v p We Wellington Ave Bigoran9a Tree Im 01: No 10 o' ch athom Or D m Th $herafoolt Or Amago+'g`�qlay Amagarset Way © Westbury LA Antler Dr Cc TutIrvine Blvd In cu e ca op an a..� 3 w z nsy Church (3rd)® z c o Palms Nineteen0l -a z a W $ - lurTres o Social Se : - • -Dartment Homes o s The Path Bike Shop Ilanlas... T Motel o Santa Ana Q K r = 3 < Q z © El Pollo Norteho dmini, 1 17 Avila s El Ranchito Q D D v n McDonald': 0. gs e Ot 2 •O I ©Fjr?;rStreet "• W First SS11 0 W First St W First St E First St E First St E First st • • 1 ompoundinharmacy o O Santa Ana DMV ® P WSS -n Advance habv , 3 n Peppertree I Slnr Ira ("antar of Ti lain ro •. Pnrle City Council SOURCE: GOOGLE KEY ® = STUDY INTERSECTION © SEGMENT =I pROADWAY SITE CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIX FIGURE 1 INITY MAP , SANTA ANA io t- L . ' .. '.': ... ...'- .... f j'.. g I1,'I �f 1' . _, is .. �. •. _ ': X:. ' r �• ........ ...... ---- a ................. 'I ...{ r ............� :'. SOURCE: GOOGLE i KEY FIGURE 2 �•� = PROJECT SITE N Cit Council 18 — 1728 SITE PLAN y CABRILLO TOWN CENTER MIX — T, SANTA ANA City Council SOURCE: ARCHITECTS ORANGE 18 — 1729 FIGURE 3 PROPOSE SITE PLAN CABRILLO TOWN CENTER AWW2022CT, SANTA ANA z ® � Q o ® N N ffeTil • / O ANTA ANA STATION lw •• I • •� s` r-7- 1 E Nim WON t :� • o oCmmm a .. (tNO SCALE SOURCE: OCTA KEY = PROJECT SITE FIGURE 4 OCTA TRANSIT MAP -USE PROJECT. SANTA ANA r riannea Paremn000 - Cr Santa Ana Health Center 4 Q Q 0 © Q 171h st Storbucks 17 Target Q ® 0 0 Q Zou's Bakery Superior Grocers Ross press for Less 0 's n y v E 15rt1 S7 P tQ�'r F r +stt: s: c Vand eqLb� s a e totr st - Black Angus Steakhouse s: a E Vfashington Avo �q h'I A B U R Y PARK E Well nplDnAve ? �pnaeana�e 0 Redwoods Homeowners 0 ASSOCt$tlon 4 -- to � Oran _ aunty z O" Global Medienter Nor 4 r H z� 3 Q � � 6 in s Lake Dianne Apartments s : rr>p Sc DID e 1Ae sn erbrnri+[3r j 3 �a Cabrillo Park � AmaaanactYrar Bsr j r e m s' Helen Estock w� air ° s _ _ _ ... W Elementary School �______i z MartQr Colur I © Tustin ° 'f41} SADDLEBACK r V I E W nsuul comi Mexico � hvine9lvd rY o 0 limited Mutel G Santa Alw 4 Social Securrty v� AdministOon E, W P o 111--postal � '1 Q Q Santa Ana 0 MV 0 E First St 55 W Fh st 5t a pe i�i tree N � m � 0 - p,rk SOURCE:19 O KEY FIGURE 5 LINS OTT LAIM1' & (tNO PROJECT = TRANSIT STOP TRANSIT STOP LOCATIONS engineers CARRILLO TOWN CFNTFR ►I XPROJFCT, SANTA, Pa rk f 00 tlid/ E Santa C Ia ra Ave Via• North Tustin a, � N N r N ' O �� r7 �y3� O 4b O Rt f M �rV 41ft "It. 0 O LL� .14-W rne' r-A'. (tNO SCALE SOURCE: SCAG KEY = PROJECT SITE HIGH QUALITY 2016 FIGURE 6 TRANSIT AREAS — SCAG REGION CENTER. SAN TA AN A C-i nlust:n,q �° bJbrdstiot Rx k - F La t '• - Garden Grove wmory! ' E °H` arms end L 6 O Trask Ave ���� 1 Es la .a Avi1 cr; rdenrGrove.Fwy ...-�...-..-�— N i rive w,rmSt .19 � `-'�_.��_s AIL.. rl �4rr� �■'L p m z� '� J•r' �: r %PROJECT SITE IN Hazard,Ave O�� ■� ` E F ui1 St 1= N N ■ C. .c Genler❑r t` it 1 �. c G¢�e°g\A `Pp z iJ Civ� .. ` 0 / O- ■'���..W rrzi 51 �■ w 1\ � _ rYJ��LaP •+� I MW Same Anam A,. �E 4th St ` J f a .t Iwriz,a .___ �a=�_.w rl��� .1E: WHIM �� � 11 1 ---� &sl st L f r E Chestnut Ave ■ � WNlila St 't W � \ r7 3o®L 3 f .W�ddan Ave j aim 1 QyE�,F.Ajn ave ; vtl L Balser ° II . �L ! Golf Course Ralle ol4a luf'ark 'Edinger@v I. �`e W' EESnger Ave II Mile square MAntlrQ ,lRI ; I w Regianal Park r fE Sai i Andrew 11 Mils Square ; Golf Course er•Ave ' I� rrrl I o wwarner Aire _�Ewamer Ave o y Flountain W F Valley y �y r` W Segerstr°m Ave W DYar Rd, E Ye RVP N Ml WMacArthur Blv O O LL� (tNO SCALE SOURCE: SCAG KEY FIGURE 7 f&] ILmx Denny Pnitlemie0 a tMA-n,mw-Mramm °eMln a.:ur�a.o � M0.-151Medlum Density Peeitlenuell ra ea-xoleoRlde� Aeelarno�r GENERAL PLAN LAND USE LOCAL I o M@I raop� � =ek w°Irro °�o�m stldmr,�n.a�.°°gel: ra°ry�re:°�m.ia�d,n�nmm�. °r��, °ti°. m °2�,¢� �weni comet°rt��ene�aimmm°�1 �g° m JURISDICTION'S LAND USE DESIGNATIONS _ �nl--°ha-1 nnl°avIn.1haoa,�l,nNlnl°nr,e,°�a11o�:°nl°��n°ahmfio� FAIRFIELD CABRILLO TOWN CENTER. SANTA ANA uuusc1 R:- c, '_,Wrdstlol Ra k Garden Grove s Fairha.ea are E O Trask Ave Tden.Grove-Fwy wr..r ty � Esanath St cramAv�� N z �a� �i1 - m 7 Y 0 m $� - '(' }! �z�'Ia�'—�� PROJECT SITE H—iIl w .r..��a.i�i jjI11 F ni p p IY' WL'Ivlc LanLr G• "i-, :�.e�T'Se�p ■■ 'Z m i V� *1.EHS yr If�P�A`■ p ML j offs Mill Ewn6L.W�l r1 E ChmtnIr ul Ar y ■ �Willite St �1 W6"shapS I S�N Z�-� ,W'rr1"cFeddan AveI ��L' * , ll ^iut [ hi�adh'en Av E ii C Ball E 4tr I i G oil Course .���� Mile Square YT/Edf Ae l ftegloral Puri of Mlles Square �We mA,d, .l Regional Parts rl ��lasaimAndre w� _ Mile Square r Golf Cour- �} �I ,Ef•AVE ewarn"er'A� �+ e W Warner Ave ■� 'lk — F`ountain l V ail eyIMP` I'w e e Imm Ave yet rzd�� Eo er Rd W Allon AVjl Y 1 ,f ,� • a w MaoArthnr e1�d � ] II.. i � N O O (!)NO SCALE SOURCE: SCAG KEY Single Family Residential Faculties Open Space and Recreation Multi -Family Residential Education Agriculture Monde Homes and Trailer Parks Milltary Installations Vacant Mixed Residential Industrial Water Rural Residential w Transportation, Communications, and Utilities Specific Plan as General Offlce Mixed Commercial and Industrial Undeveiopable Commercial and Services Mixed Residential and Commercial Unknown FIGURE 8 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE 2019 SCAG LAND USE CODES CABRILLO TOWN CENTER. SANTA ANA Huntington Beach to Tustin 164 via Bolsa Ave / 1 st St TUSTIN 6o�P�port 0yac 9 WB C 60, 64, 66, 71, 79 ■only Centennial Tustin 71 1 SANTA ANA Ross N LL GARDEN GROVE WESTMINSTER MIDWAY CITY HUNTINGTONWESTMINSTER BEACH 25,64 Q LEYENDA Scheduled Departure Regular Routing Route 064/121322 Numbers on streets indicate transfers. Ndmerosenlacalleindicantransbordos. ■ DMV Standard Main 53, 55, 553 Flower 150 Bristol57 Raitt 150 Center Fairview 47 Harbor 43, 543 Newhope Euclid 37 Brookhurst 35 Moran ■ Asian Garden Mall Magnolia 33 Beach 29,529 Goldenwest 25 Edwards www.octa.n�Qi��CeQMIWay 14, 2023 18 - 1735 10/3/2023 64Huntington Beach to Tustin via Bolsa Ave / 1 st St Monday -Friday EASTBOUNDTo: Tustin R O oZf 6 W L v m O m W v -2 = _ m C R l7 C LCr c R J 4:22 4:28 4:38 4:42 4:50 5:00 5:05 4:47 4:53 5:03 5:07 5:16 5:26 5:34 5:11 5:17 5:27 5:31 5:40 5:50 5:58 5:32 5:38 5:48 5:52 6:01 6:11 6:19 5:53 5:59 6:09 6:13 6:22 6:32 6:40 6:09 6:15 6:25 6:29 6:38 6:48 6:56 6:17 6:24 6:37 6:43 6:53 7:05 7:14 6:31 6:38 6:51 6:57 7:07 7:19 7:28 6:45 6:52 7:05 7:11 7:21 7:33 7:42 6:58 7:05 7:19 7:25 7:37 7:50 7:59 7:12 7:19 7:33 7:39 7:51 8:04 8:13 7:25 7:32 7:47 7:53 8:03 8:14 8:22 7:39 7:46 8:01 8:07 8:17 8:28 8:36 7:54 8:01 8:16 8:22 8:32 8:43 8:51 8:09 8:16 8:31 8:37 8:47 8:58 9:06 8:24 8:31 8:46 8:51 9:02 9:14 9:23 8:38 8:45 9:00 9:05 9:16 9:28 9:37 8:52 8:59 9:14 9:19 9:30 9:42 9:51 9:06 9:13 9:28 9:33 9:44 9:56 10:05 9:20 9:27 9:42 9:47 9:58 10:10 10:19 9:34 9:41 9:56 10:01 10:12 10:24 10:3 3 9:48 9:55 10:10 10:15 10:26 10:38 10:47 10:02 10:09 10:24 10:29 10:40 10:52 11:01 10:16 10:23 10:38 10:43 10:54 11:06 11:15 10:27 10:34 10:51 10:58 11:09 11:20 11:29 10:42 10:49 11:06 11:13 11:24 11:35 11:44 10:57 11:04 11:21 11:28 11:39 11:50 11:5 9 11:12 11:19 11:36 11:43 11:54 12:05 12:14 11:27 11:35 11:52 11:58 12:09 12:21 12:30 11:42 11:50 12:07 12:13 12:24 12:36 12:45 11:57 12:05 12:22 12:28 12:39 12:51 1:00 12:12 12:20 12:37 12:43 12:54 1:06 1:15 12:26 12:34 12:51 12:58 1:09 1:22 1:31 Monday -Friday EASTBOUND To: Tustin (cont.) Q ca W L N m H .2 v W � = m C rY6 kD v s C J 12:41 12:49 1:06 1:13 1:24 1:37 1:46 12:56 1:04 1:21 1:28 1:39 1:52 2:01 1:11 1:19 1:36 1:43 1:54 2:07 2:16 1:27 1:35 1:52 1:58 2:09 2:22 2:31 1:42 1:50 2:07 2:13 2:24 2:37 2:46 1:56 2:04 2:21 2:27 2:38 2:51 3:00 2:11 2:19 2:36 2:42 2:53 3:06 3:15 2:26 2:34 2:51 2:57 3:08 3:21 3:30 2:41 2:48 3:05 3:12 3:24 3:38 3:47 2:54 3:01 3:18 3:25 3:37 3:51 4:00 3:06 3:13 3:30 3:37 3:49 4:03 4:12 3:19 3:27 3:44 3:50 4:02 4:15 4:24 3:30 3:38 3:55 4:01 4:13 4:26 4:35 3:42 3:50 4:07 4:13 4:25 4:38 4:47 3:54 4:03 4:191 4:25 4:36 4:49 4:57 4:06 4:15 4:31 4:37 4:48 5:01 5:09 4:18 4:27 4:43 4:49 5:00 5:13 5:21 4:30 4:39 4:55 5:01 5:12 5:25 5:33 4:43 4:52 5:07 5:13 5:24 5:36 5:44 4:55 5:04 5:19 5:25 5:36 5:48 5:56 5:07 5:16 5:31 5:37 5:48 6:00 6:08 5:19 5:28 5:43 5:49 6:00 6:12 6:20 5:32 5:40 5:55 6:01 6:11 6:23 6:31 5:44 5:52 6:07 6:13 6:23 6:35 6:43 5:56 6:04 6:19 6:25 6:35 6:47 6:55 6:19 6:26 6:39 6:45 6:55 7:06 7:13 6:39 6:46 6:59 7:05 7:15 7:26 7:33 7:03 7:10 7:23 7:29 7:39 7:50 7:57 7:34 7:41 7:54 8:00 8:10 8:21 8:28 8:06 8:13 8:25 8:30 8:38 8:49 8:56 8:51 8:58 9:10 9:15 9:23 9:34 9:41 9:53 9:59 10:11 10:16 10:24 10:35 10:42 10:56 11:02 11:12 11:16 11:24 11:34 11:41 * This stop is 400 feet north of Bolsa on Edwards for both East and West trips. Esta parado estd a 400 pies of norte de Bolso en Edwards para los viajes hocio el este y oeste. City Council 18 - 1736 Effective May 14,GJ61(ig23ww.octa.net Monday -Friday WESTBOUND To: Huntington Beach v C f6 U' Vf GO N S N W Vf v cc _H m N o -O m � W 4:53 5:01 5:12 5:21 5:25 5:35 5:42 5:10 5:18 5:29 5:38 5:42 5:52 5:59 5:27 5:35 5:46 5:55 5:59 6:09 6:16 5:44 5:52 6:03 6:12 6:16 6:26 6:33 5:54 6:03 6:14 6:23 6:27 6:37 6:44 6:08 6:17 6:28 6:37 6:41 6:51 6:58 6:22 6:31 6:42 6:51 6:55 7:05 7:12 6:36 6:45 6:56 7:05 7:09 7:19 7:26 6:50 6:59 7:10 7:19 7:23 7:33 7:40 6:59 7:11 7:23 7:33 7:37 7:51 7:59 7:13 7:25 7:37 7:47 7:51 8:05 8:13 7:27 7:39 7:51 8:01 8:05 8:19 8:27 7:41 7:53 8:05 8:15 8:19 8:33 8:41 7:55 8:07 8:19 8:29 8:33 8:47 8:55 8:09 8:21 8:33 8:43 8:47 9:01 9:09 8:23 8:35 8:47 8:57 9:01 9:15 9:23 8:37 8:49 9:01 9:11 9:15 9:29 9:37 8:51 9:03 9:16 9:26 9:30 9:47 9:55 9:06 9:18 9:31 9:41 9:45 10:02 10:10 9:21 9:33 9:46 9:56 10:00 10:17 10:25 9:36 9:48 10:01 10:11 10:15 10:32 10:40 9:51 10:03 10:16 10:26 10:30 10:47 10:55 10:06 10:18 10:31 10:41 10:45 11:02 11:10 10:20 10:32 10:45 10:56 11:01 11:18 11:26 10:35 10:47 11:00 11:11 11:16 11:33 11:41 10:50 11:02 11:15 11:26 11:31 11:48 11:56 11:05 11:17 11:30 11:41 11:46 12:03 12:11 11:20 11:32 11:45 11:56 12:01 12:18 12:26 11:33 11:47 12:01 12:11 12:16 12:32 12:40 11:48 12:02 12:16 12:26 12:31 12:47 12:55 12:03 12:17 12:31 12:41 12:46 1:02 1:10 12:20 12:33 12:47 12:56 1:00 1:17 1:25 12:35 12:48 1:02 1:11 1:15 1:32 1 1:40 Huntington Beach to Tustin via Bolsa Ave / 1 St St ml Monday -Friday WESTBOUND To: Huntington Beach (cont.) v C kD CO S W L v o -6 12:50 1:03 1:17 1:26 1:30 1:47 1:5 5 1:05 1:18 1:32 1:41 1:45 2:02 2:10 1:20 1:33 1:47 1:56 2:00 2:17 2:25 1:31 1:45 1:59 2:11 2:16 2:32 2:41 1:45 1:59 2:13 2:25 2:30 2:46 2:55 1:59 2:13 2:27 2:39 2:44 3:00 3:09 2:15 2:29 2:43 2:55 3:OO 3:16 3:25 2:31 2:45 2:59 3:11 3:16 3:32 3:41 2:45 3:00 3:15 3:26 3:31 3:46 3:54 2:58 3:13 3:28 3:39 3:44 3:59 4:07 3:10 3:25 3:40 3:51 3:56 4:11 4:19 3:22 3:37 3:52 4:03 4:08 4:23 4:31 3:34 3:49 4:04 4:15 4:20 4:35 4:43 3:46 4:01 4:16 4:27 4:32 4:47 4:55 3:58 4:13 4:28 4:39 4:44 4:59 5:07 4:10 4:25 4:40 4:51 4:56 5:11 5:19 4:22 4:37 4:52 5:03 5:08 5:23 5:31 4:34 4:49 5:04 5:15 5:20 5:35 5:43 4:48 5:03 5:17 5:27 5:32 5:45 5:53 5:00 5:15 5:29 5:39 5:44 5:57 6:05 5:12 5:27 5:41 5:51 5:56 6:09 6:17 5:26 5:40 5:53 6:03 6:08 6:21 6:28 5:38 5:52 6:05 6:15 6:20 6:33 6:40 5:50 6:04 6:17 6:27 6:32 6:45 6:52 6:06 6:20 6:33 6:43 6:48 7:01 7:08 6:22 6:36 6:49 6:59 7:04 7:17 7:24 6:45 6:58 7:10 7:19 7:24 7:37 7:43 7:05 7:18 7:30 7:39 7:44 7:57 8:03 7:35 7:48 8:00 8:09 8:14 8:27 8:33 8:07 8:20 8:32 8:41 8:46 8:59 9:05 8:55 9:04 9:14 9:21 9:25 9:36 9:42 9:55 10:04 10:14 10:21 10:25 10:36 10:42 10:56 11:05 11:15 11:22 11:26 11:37 11:43 * This stop is 400 feet north of Bolsa on Edwards for both East and West trips. Esta parada estd a 400 pies al norte de Bolso en Edwards para los viajes hocia el este y oeste. www.octa.n�Qi��CeQMICAay 14, 2023 18 - 1737 10/3/2023 64Huntington Beach to Tustin via Bolsa Ave / 1 st St Saturday EASTBOUNDTo: Tustin o m ca n tj W t (U m _H O m a V W � -2 2 .- — m � c to l7 N C 6 J 5:27 5:33 5:46 5:51 5:58 6:11 6:22 5:49 5:55 6:08 6:13 6:20 6:33 6:44 6:11 6:17 6:30 6:35 6:42 6:56 7:09 6:33 6:39 6:52 6:57 7:04 7:18 7:31 6:55 7:01 7:14 7:19 7:26 7:40 7:53 7:17 7:23 7:36 7:41 7:48 8:02 8:15 7:38 7:44 7:57 8:02 8:09 8:23 8:36 7:58 8:04 8:17 8:22 8:29 8:43 8:56 8:19 8:25 8:38 8:43 8:50 9:04 9:17 8:36 8:43 8:58 9:04 9:11 9:26 9:40 8:56 9:03 9:18 9:24 9:31 9:46 10:00 9:15 9:22 9:37 9:43 9:50 10:05 10:19 9:30 9:37 9:52 9:58 10:05 10:20 10:34 9:45 9:52 10:07 10:13 10:20 10:35 10:49 10:00 10:07 10:22 10:28 10:35 10:50 11:04 10:15 10:22 10:37 10:43 10:50 11:05 11:19 10:28 10:35 10:52 10:58 11:06 11:22 11:36 10:43 10:50 11:07 11:13 11:21 11:37 11:51 10:58 11:05 11:22 11:28 11:36 11:52 12:06 11:13 11:20 11:37 11:43 11:51 12:07 12:21 11:28 11:35 11:52 11:58 12:06 12:22 12:36 11:43 11:50 12:07 12:13 12:21 12:37 12:51 11:58 12:05 12:22 12:28 12:36 12:52 1:06 12:13 12:20 12:37 12:43 12:51 1:07 1:21 12:28 12:35 12:52 12:58 1:06 1:22 1:36 12:43 12:50 1:07 1:13 1:21 1:37 1:51 12:56 1:03 1:23 1:28 1:38 1:55 2:09 Saturday EASTBOUND To: Tustin (cont.) N oco Vi f 6 W t v m O CO .2 6/ w 06 — lu 06 — 06 — 12 0 — (.a fG J 1:13 1:20 1:37 1:43 1:50 2:07 2:20 1:28 1:35 1:52 1:58 2:05 2:22 2:35 1:43 1:50 2:07 2:13 2:20 2:37 2:50 1:58 2:05 2:22 2:28 2:35 2:52 3:05 2:13 2:20 2:37 2:43 2:50 3:07 3:20 2:28 2:35 2:52 2:58 3:05 3:22 3:35 2:43 2:50 3:07 3:13 3:20 3:37 3:50 2:58 3:05 3:22 3:28 3:35 3:52 4:05 3:14 3:21 3:38 3:44 3:51 4:08 4:21 3:29 3:36 3:53 3:59 4:06 4:23 4:36 3:46 3:53 4:09 4:15 4:22 4:37 4:50 4:00 4:07 4:23 4:29 4:36 4:51 5:04 4:13 4:20 4:36 4:42 4:49 5:04 5:17 4:28 4:35 4:51 4:57 5:04 5:19 5:32 4:43 4:50 5:06 5:12 5:19 5:34 5:47 4:59 5:06 5:22 5:28 5:35 5:50 6:03 5:14 5:21 5:37 5:43 5:50 6:05 6:18 5:29 5:36 5:52 5:58 6:05 6:20 6:33 5:58 6:05 6:21 6:27 6:34 6:49 7:02 6:29 6:35 6:50 6:56 7:02 7:17 7:30 6:59 7:05 7:20 7:26 7:32 7:47 8:00 7:31 7:37 7:52 7:58 8:04 8:19 8:32 8:03 8:09 8:22 8:26 8:32 8:46 8:58 8:33 8:39 8:52 8:56 9:02 9:16 9:28 9:03 9:09 9:22 9:26 9:32 9:46 9:58 10:03 1 10:09 10:22 10:26 10:32 10:46 10:58 * This stop is 400 feet north of Bolsa on Edwards for both East and West trips. Esto porado estd o 400 pies of norte de Bolsa en Edwards pora los viojes hacia el estey oeste. City Council 18 - 1738 Effective May 14,E g23ww.octa.net Saturday WESTBOUND To: Huntington Beach S C J C l7 m 2 V w V m H m R oZS � -2 W 5:12 5:18 5:32 5:39 5:43 5:55 6:07 5:37 5:43 5:57 6:04 6:08 6:20 6:32 5:59 6:05 6:19 6:26 6:30 6:42 6:54 6:21 6:27 6:41 6:48 6:52 7:04 7:16 6:43 6:49 7:03 7:10 7:14 7:26 7:38 7:05 7:11 7:25 7:32 7:36 7:48 8:00 7:23 7:32 7:47 7:54 7:58 8:10 8:22 7:45 7:54 8:09 8:16 8:20 8:32 8:44 8:06 8:15 8:30 8:37 8:41 8:53 9:05 8:28 8:37 8:52 8:59 9:03 9:15 9:27 8:46 8:55 9:12 9:20 9:25 9:42 9:55 9:06 9:15 9:32 9:40 9:45 10:02 10:15 9:24 9:33 9:50 9:58 10:03 10:20 10:33 9:39 9:48 10:05 10:13 10:18 10:35 10:48 9:54 10:03 10:20 10:28 10:33 10:50 11:03 10:09 10:18 10:35 10:43 10:48 11:05 11:18 10:24 10:33 10:50 10:58 11:03 11:20 11:33 10:39 10:48 11:05 11:13 11:18 11:35 11:48 10:53 11:02 11:19 11:27 11:32 11:49 12:02 11:07 11:16 11:33 11:41 11:46 12:03 12:16 11:21 11:30 11:47 11:55 12:00 12:17 12:30 11:32 11:43 12:01 12:09 12:14 12:32 12:46 11:49 12:00 12:18 12:26 12:31 12:49 1:03 12:04 12:15 12:33 12:41 12:46 1:04 1:18 12:19 12:30 12:48 12:56 1:01 1:19 1:33 12:34 12:45 1:03 1:12 1:17 1:33 1:46 12:50 1:01 1:19 1:28 1:33 1:49 2:02 1:05 1:16 1:34 1:43 1 1:48 2:04 1 2:17 Huntington Beach to Tustin via Bolsa Ave / 1 St St ml Saturday WESTBOUND To: Huntington Beach (cont.) N C J C 6 l7 00 2 Ca -O V W V CD Om 0.S H 0 c6 o oZS -6 W 1:20 1:31 1:49 1:58 2:03 2:19 2:32 1:35 1:46 2:04 2:13 2:18 2:34 2:47 1:50 2:01 2:19 2:28 2:33 2:49 3:02 2:05 2:16 2:34 2:43 2:48 3:04 3:17 2:20 2:31 2:49 2:58 3:03 3:19 3:32 2:35 2:46 3:04 3:13 3:18 3:34 3:47 2:50 3:01 3:19 3:28 3:33 3:49 4:02 3:05 3:16 3:34 3:43 3:48 4:04 4:17 3:20 3:31 3:49 3:58 4:03 4:19 4:32 3:35 3:46 4:04 4:13 4:18 4:34 4:47 3:50 4:01 4:19 4:28 4:33 4:49 5:02 4:05 4:16 4:34 4:43 4:48 5:04 5:17 4:20 4:31 4:49 4:58 5:03 5:19 5:32 4:35 4:46 5:04 5:13 5:18 5:34 5:47 4:50 5:01 5:19 5:28 5:33 5:49 6:02 5:05 5:16 5:34 5:43 5:48 6:04 6:17 5:27 5:37 5:52 5:59 6:04 6:17 6:29 5:42 5:52 6:07 6:14 6:19 6:32 6:44 5:57 6:07 6:22 6:29 6:34 6:47 6:59 6:15 6:25 6:40 6:47 6:52 7:05 7:17 6:35 6:45 7:00 7:07 7:12 7:25 7:37 6:55 7:05 7:20 7:27 7:32 7:45 7:57 7:20 7:30 7:45 7:52 7:57 8:10 8:22 7:50 8:00 8:15 8:22 8:27 8:40 8:52 8:20 8:30 8:45 8:52 8:57 9:10 9:22 8:50 9:00 9:16 9:22 9:26 9:37 9:49 9:57 10:07 10:23 10:29 10:33 10:44 10:56 * This stop is 400 feet north of Bolsa on Edwards for both East and West trips. Esta parada esta a 400 pies al norte de Bolsa en Edwards pora los viojes hacia el este y oeste. www.octa.n�Qi��CeQMIWay 14, 2023 18 - 1739 10/3/2023 64Huntington Beach to Tustin via Bolsa Ave / 1 st St Sunday & Holiday EASTBOUNDTo: Tustin o ca v i s v m o6 V W -2 S m m V to C 6:11 6:17 6:30 6:35 6:44 6:54 7:01 6:42 6:48 6:59 7:04 7:11 7:20 7:28 7:02 7:08 7:21 7:26 7:35 7:46 7:54 7:24 7:30 7:43 7:48 7:57 8:08 8:16 7:46 7:52 8:06 8:11 8:21 8:32 8:40 8:08 8:14 8:28 8:33 8:43 8:54 9:02 8:28 8:34 8:48 8:53 9:03 9:14 9:22 8:45 8:51 9:05 9:10 9:20 9:31 9:39 9:01 9:07 9:22 9:27 9:37 9:47 9:55 9:16 9:22 9:37 9:42 9:52 10:02 10:10 9:31 9:37 9:52 9:57 10:07 10:17 10:25 9:45 9:51 10:07 10:12 10:22 10:31 10:39 10:00 10:06 10:22 10:27 10:37 10:46 10:54 10:15 10:21 10:37 10:42 10:52 11:01 11:09 10:30 10:36 10:52 10:57 11:07 11:16 11:24 10:45 10:51 11:07 11:12 11:22 11:31 11:39 10:59 11:06 11:22 11:27 11:36 11:46 11:55 11:14 11:21 11:37 11:42 11:51 12:01 12:10 11:29 11:36 11:52 11:57 12:06 12:16 12:25 11:44 11:51 12:07 12:12 12:21 12:31 12:40 11:59 12:06 12:22 12:27 12:37 12:47 12:55 12:14 12:21 12:37 12:42 12:52 1:02 1:10 12:29 12:36 12:52 12:57 1:07 1:17 1:25 12:44 12:51 1:07 1:12 1:22 1:32 1:40 12:59 1:06 1:22 1:27 1:37 1:47 1:55 Sunday & Holiday EASTBOUND To: Tustin (cont.) ot ds -2 j W v m o6 H m a V .15 5 � .25 ca t6 ca �' 3 is i J 1:14 1:21 1:37 1:42 1:52 2:03 2:11 1:29 1:36 1:52 1:57 2:07 2:18 2:26 1:44 1:51 2:07 2:12 2:22 2:33 2:41 1:59 2:06 2:22 2:27 2:37 2:48 2:56 2:14 2:21 2:37 2:42 2:52 3:03 3:11 2:29 2:36 2:52 2:57 3:07 3:18 3:26 2:44 2:51 3:07 3:12 3:22 3:33 3:41 2:59 3:06 3:22 3:27 3:37 3:48 3:56 3:14 3:21 3:37 3:42 3:52 4:03 4:11 3:29 3:36 3:52 3:57 4:07 4:18 4:26 3:47 3:54 4:08 4:12 4:21 4:32 4:41 4:02 4:09 4:23 4:27 4:36 4:47 4:56 4:17 4:24 4:38 4:42 4:51 5:02 5:11 4:32 4:39 4:53 4:57 5:06 5:17 5:26 4:47 4:54 5:08 5:12 5:21 5:32 5:41 5:03 5:09 5:23 5:27 5:36 5:46 5:54 5:25 5:31 5:45 5:49 5:58 6:08 6:16 5:47 5:53 6:07 6:11 6:20 6:30 6:38 6:09 6:15 6:29 6:33 6:42 6:52 7:00 6:33 6:39 6:52 6:56 7:05 7:16 7:24 7:00 7:06 7:19 7:23 7:32 7:43 7:51 7:32 7:38 7:51 7:55 8:04 8:13 8:20 8:00 8:06 8:19 8:23 8:32 8:41 8:48 8:29 8:35 8:47 8:51 8:59 9:09 9:16 9:30 9:36 9:48 9:52 10:00 1 10:10 10:17 * This stop is 400 feet north of Bolsa on Edwards for both East and West trips. Esto porado estd o 400 pies of norte de Bolsa en Edwards pora los viojes hacia el estey oeste. City Council 18 — 1740 Effective May 14,GJ61(ig23ww.octa.net Sunday & Holiday WESTBOUND To: Huntington Beach N C R l7 m R 2 W V o?S H -O m 5:36 5:42 5:53 6:00 6:04 6:14 6:20 6:01 6:07 6:18 6:25 6:29 6:39 6:45 6:24 6:31 6:42 6:50 6:54 7:05 7:11 6:49 6:56 7:07 7:15 7:19 7:30 7:36 7:11 7:18 7:29 7:37 7:41 7:52 7:58 7:28 7:37 7:50 7:59 8:03 8:17 8:24 7:50 7:59 8:12 8:21 8:25 8:39 8:46 8:12 8:21 8:34 8:43 8:47 9:01 9:08 8:32 8:41 8:54 9:03 9:07 9:21 9:28 8:52 9:01 9:14 9:23 9:27 9:41 9:48 9:09 9:18 9:31 9:40 9:44 9:59 10:07 9:25 9:34 9:47 9:56 10:00 10:15 10:23 9:41 9:50 10:03 10:12 10:16 10:31 10:39 9:5 7 10:06 10:19 10:28 10:32 10:47 10:5 5 10:12 10:21 10:34 10:43 10:47 11:02 11:10 10:27 10:36 10:49 10:58 11:02 11:17 11:25 10:42 10:51 11:04 11:13 11:17 11:32 11:40 10:57 11:06 11:19 11:28 11:32 11:47 11:55 11:13 11:21 11:34 11:43 11:48 12:03 12:11 11:28 11:36 11:49 11:58 12:03 12:18 12:26 11:40 11:49 12:03 12:13 12:17 12:32 12:40 11:55 12:04 12:18 12:28 12:32 12:47 12:55 12:10 12:19 12:33 12:43 12:47 1:02 1:10 12:25 12:34 12:48 12:58 1:02 1:17 1:25 12:40 12:49 1:03 1:13 1:17 1:31 1:39 12:55 1:04 1:18 1:28 1:32 1:46 1:54 1:10 1:19 1 1:33 1:43 1:47 2:01 2:09 Huntington Beach to Tustin via Bolsa Ave / 1 St St Sunday & Holiday WESTBOUND To: Huntington Beach (cont.) v : Ln C C R lJ CO 2 CO W Ca t VCO Qj m d% _H o ds -22 1:25 1:34 1:48 1:58 2:02 2:16 2:24 1:40 1:49 2:03 2:13 2:17 2:31 2:39 1:55 2:04 2:18 2:28 2:32 2:46 2:54 2:10 2:19 2:33 2:43 2:47 3:01 3:09 2:25 2:34 2:48 2:58 3:02 3:16 3:24 2:40 2:49 3:03 3:13 3:17 3:31 3:39 2:55 3:04 3:18 3:28 3:32 3:46 3:54 3:10 3:19 3:33 3:43 3:47 4:01 4:09 3:27 3:36 3:49 3:58 4:03 4:15 4:22 3:42 3:51 4:04 4:13 1 4:18 4:30 4:37 3:57 4:06 4:19 4:28 4:33 4:45 4:52 4:12 4:21 4:34 4:43 4:48 5:00 5:07 4:27 4:36 4:49 4:58 5:03 5:15 5:22 4:42 4:51 5:04 5:13 5:18 5:30 5:37 4:57 5:06 5:19 5:28 5:33 5:45 5:52 5:12 5:21 5:34 5:43 5:48 6:00 6:07 5:26 5:36 5:48 5:58 6:03 6:16 6:23 5:46 5:56 6:08 6:18 6:23 6:36 6:43 6:07 6:16 6:29 6:38 6:43 6:55 7:02 6:27 6:36 6:49 6:58 7:03 7:15 7:22 6:55 7:04 7:17 7:26 7:31 7:43 7:50 7:24 7:33 7:46 7:55 8:00 8:12 8:19 8:01 8:09 8:21 8:30 8:34 8:44 8:51 8:30 8:38 8:50 8:59 9:03 9:13 9:20 9:00 9:08 9:20 9:29 9:33 9:43 9:50 9:54 10:02 10:13 10:20 10:24 10:34 10 * This stop is 400 feet north of Bolsa on Edwards for both East and West trips. Esta parada esta a 400 pies al norte de Bolsa en Edwards pora los viojes hacia el este y oeste. www.octa.n�Qi��CeQMIWay 14, 2023 18 - 1741 10/3/2023 TRAFFIC MEMORANDUM To: Ed McCoy, Senior Vice President -Development Date: March 29, 2023 Fairfield Residential/FRH Realty, LLC From: Richard Barretto, P.E., Princ _LLG Ref:2.22.4531.1 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Z&M� Updated Traffic Circulation Analysis Addendum (original dated 0210112023) Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project Subject: 1901 E. 41h Street — SP22-026 Santa Ana, CA Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to provide the following Updated Traffic Circulation Analysis (TCA) addendum in response to change in proposed access design for the easterly driveway on Fourth Street that was originally identified as "Paseo/Fire Lane" in Figure 2-2 — Proposed Site Plan, attached, prepared by AO Architects, dated 11/10/2022. This site plan was evaluated in approved Trajjtc Circulation Analysis for the Cabrillo Towne Center Mixed -Use Project, dated November 18, 2022 (Approved TCA). The approved TCA considered the designation of the "Paseo/Fire Lane" and understood (assumed) that the driveway would have limited use for "move -ins" and service/trash trucks as well as emergency vehicles. As such, the distribution and assignment of Project -related trips to this driveway during the weekday AM peak hour or PM peak hour amounted to zero (0) trips as these type of trips would typically occur outside of the weekday commute hours. From a review of the current site plan, Figure A — Proposed Site Plan, attached, prepared by AO Architects, dated 01/25/2023, the easterly driveway on Fourth Street is now identified as a "Paseo/Service Lane". We understand that this driveway would continue to be used as access for "move -ins" and service/trash trucks as well as emergency vehicles as previously assumed. Given no change in vehicular use for the easterly driveway on Fourth Street is planned, the findings and conclusions of the approved Traffic Circulation Analysis for the Cabrillo Towne Center Mixed -Use Project, dated November 18, 2022 (Approved TCA) remain valid and no revisions to the report are recommended or necessary. In response to additional City staff comments, a line of sight evaluation has been prepared for the proposed "Paseo/Service Lane" driveway as identified in Figure A — Proposed Site Plan. Engineers & Planners Traffic Transportation Parking Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 2Executive Circle Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92614 949.825.6175 T 949.825.6173 F www.Ilgengineers.com Pasadena Irvine San Diego Woodland Hills City Council 18 — 1742 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Report\4531 Traffic Addendum 03-29-2023.doc Zdenek "Zed" Kekula, P.E. March 29, 2023 Page 2 At the project driveway, a substantially clear line of sight should be maintained between the driver of a vehicle waiting at the crossroad and the driver of an approaching vehicle. Adequate time must be provided for the waiting vehicle to turn right without requiring through traffic to radically alter their speed. A sight distance evaluation has been performed for the project driveways located along 41h Street. The Sight Distance Evaluation prepared for the Project's easterly driveway on Fourth Street is based on the criteria and procedures set forth by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the State's Highway Design Manual (HDM). Corner sight distance was utilized for the evaluation. Corner sight distance is defined in the Caltrans HDM to be the distance required by the driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to maneuver their vehicle and avoid an object without radically altering their speed. Line of sight for corner sight distance is to be determined from a 3 %2 foot height at the location of the driver of a vehicle on a minor road to a 41/4 foot object height in the center of the approaching lane of the major road. Based on the criteria set forth in Table 405.1A of the Caltrans HDM and a posted speed limit of 40 mph on 4th Street, a corner sight distance of 382 feet is required for right -turning vehicles at the Project Driveway. Figure B presents the result of the sight distance evaluation for right -turning vehicles at the easterly Project Driveway located along Fourth Street based on the application of the corner sight distance criteria. This figure illustrates the limited use areas. As an alternative, the easterly Project driveway located along Fourth Street has been assessed with the driveway being shifted 15 feet to the west. Figure C presents the result of the sight distance results. This figure illustrates the limited use areas as well. From a review of Figure B and Figure C, the sight lines at this proposed Project driveway is expected to be adequate as long as obstructions within the sight triangles are minimized. Please let us know if you have any comments or questions regarding this updated traffic memorandum. Attachments cc: Shane S. Green, P.E., LLG File City Council 18 — 1743 10/3/2023 N:\4500\2224531 - Fairfield Cabrillo Town Center, Santa Ana\Report\4531 Traffic Addendum 03-29-2023.doc �h Am 4�i�low �. I , y G ■ Lh �—MR 3MOP SOURCE: ARCHITECTS ORANGE dated 11/10/2022 FIGURE 2-2 �NO SCALE PROPOSE SITE PLAN City Council 18 — 1744 CABRILLO TOWN CENTER mAW3d2&2,3CT, SANTA ANA City Council SOURCE: ARCHITECTS ORANGE dated 01/25/2022 18 — 1745 FIGURE A PROPOSE SITE PLAN CABRILLO TOWN CENTER AWW2023CT, SANTA ANA I i'IIi jl F- �I 1 CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE DESIGN SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH REQUIRED STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE LOOKING LEFT: 382 FEET LEGEND ® PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LIMITED USE AREA: TO ENSURE ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCE, HARDSCAPE AND/OR LANDSCAPE SHALL NOT BE HIGHER THAN 30 INCHES ABOVE THE CURB/SIDEWALK. NO FENCES OR WALLS IN LIMITED USE AREA. I rI M rl I •I SOURCE: C&V CONSULTING FIGURE B (ND SCALE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 2 SIGHT DISTANCE &NAi*8iS FOR RIGHT G VEHICLES City Council 18 — 1746 CABRILLO TOWN CENTER mAW3d2&22CT, SANTA ANA 0 CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE DESIGN SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH REQUIRED STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE LOOKING LEFT: 382 FEET LEGEND ® PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LIMITED USE AREA: TO ENSURE ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCE, HARDSCAPE AND/OR LANDSCAPE SHALL NOT BE HIGHER THAN 30 INCHES ABOVE THE CURB/SIDEWALK. NO FENCES OR WALLS IN LIMITED USE AREA. I �I M I All q. SOURCE: ARCHITECTS ORANGE FIGURE C' (ND SCALE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 2 SIGHT DISTANCE &NAi*8iS FOR RIGHT G VEHICLES City Council 18 — 1747 CABRILLO TOWN CENTER mAW3d2&22CT, SANTA ANA 0 0 n NN Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) 1. Response to Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) Letter dated April 24, 2023 Appeal Application No. 2023-02 (SAFER) Pursuant to Section 41-645 of the SAMC, the appellant is requesting that the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's decision approving SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03 based on compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Specifically, the appellant states that: (1) The decision of the Planning Commission was in "violation" of CEQA; (2) The City's determination that the Project was analyzed in the 2010 Metro East Mixed Used (MEMU) Overlay Zone EIR and Subsequent EIR was incorrect; (3) The Project would have new and different significant environmental impacts that were not analyzed in the MEMU EIR; and (4) That a project -specific EIR should have been prepared to analyze the Project. Staff notes that the appellant does not provide any substantial evidence that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Moreover, the appellant does not provide information as to why they believe a project -specific EIR should have been prepared, or what new and different significant environmental impacts would result from the Project that have not already been analyzed in the EIR and Subsequent EIR. Nevertheless, a comprehensive response on the appeal items previously outlined has been prepared. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Sections 15162 and 15168 of the CEQA guidelines, staff deemed that the Project is within the scope of the 2007 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone Environmental Impact Report (EIR), hereinafter referred to as "Certified EIR." Per Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 (a), when an EIR has been certified, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole records, one or more of the following: Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or City Council 18 — 1748 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or D. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) sets forth criteria to use a program EIR for "later activities." Specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) states the following: c) Use with Later Activities. Later activities in the program must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. 1) If a later activity would have effects that were not examined in the program EIR, a new Initial Study would need to be prepared leading to either an EIR or a Negative Declaration. That later analysis may tier from the program EIR a provided in Section 15152. 2) If the agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR, and no new environmental document would be required. Whether a later activity is within the scope of a program EIR is a factual question that the lead agency determines based on substantial evidence in the record. Factors that an agency may consider in making that determination include, but are not limited to, consistency of the later activity with the type of allowable land use, overall planned density and building intensity, geographic area analyzed for environmental impacts, and covered infrastructure, as described in the program EIR. 3) An agency shall incorporate feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed in the program EIR into later activities in the program. City Council 18 — 1749 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) 4) Where the later activities involve site -specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the operation were within the scope of the program EIR. Based on staff's analysis, the Certified EIR meets the definition under Guidelines Section 15168(a) because the Certified EIR analyzed the potential impacts associated with the MEMU Overlay Zone, which is a generally applicable plan containing rules, regulations and other general criteria governing a specified geographically contained area. The Certified EIR fully analyzed the potential environmental effects associated with the City's adoption of the MEMU and subsequent foreseeable development within the MEMU. As discussed below, the Project is fully consistent with the MEMU Overlay Zone and within the scope of the Certified EIR. The Project Site is located in the Village Center District of the MEMU. Uses allowed in the Village Center District include a mix of commercial, office, and residential in mid -rise buildings of between 4 and 10 stories in a setting that provides open spaces, niches, and areas for gatherings and activities along streets, paseos, and interconnecting walkways that link the Village Center to adjacent districts and nearby public parks north of the Village Center District. The Project conforms to this description by including development of the Project Site with a mixed -use development including up to 507 residential dwelling units (including apartments, live/work units, and townhomes), approximately 26,800 square feet of commercial uses, and associated parking, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and open space in accordance with the Development Standards outlined in Table 1 in the Project Description of the Draft EIR portion of the Certified EIR. As described in the Project Description section of this staff report, the Project Site would be separated into two distinct areas by a roadway (Parkcourt Place), which would traverse the site east/west. The northern portion of the Project Site would be developed with 58 townhomes and the southern portion would be developed with a five -story mixed -use building with 449 apartment units and 26,800 square feet of ground -floor commercial uses, which could include retail, office, and shopkeeper, surrounded by a central open space area and a pedestrian infrastructure to connect the Project to adjacent land uses. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the allowable development under the MEMU. Finally, all applicable mitigation measures from the Certified EIR would be implemented by the Project, and each of the applicable mitigation measures would also be made conditions of approval for the Project. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe significant impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance that has become available that would result in new or more severe significant impacts. Moreover, no subsequent EIR would be required for the Project. Based on the analysis herein and the Certified EIR and 3 City Council 18 — 1750 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) the whole of the record, under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, the Certified EIR adequately described the Project activity for purposes of CEQA. 2. Response to Southwest Mountain States Carpenters (SWMSRCC) Letter dated May 3, 2023 Appeal Application No. 2023-03 (SWMSRCC) Pursuant to Section 41-645(a) of the SAMC, this appellant is requesting that the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's decision approving SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03 and provides four main reasons to substantiate the request, including: (1) Requirement of a local workforce; (2) Training requirements to prevent community spread of Covid-19 and other infectious diseases; (3) CEQA compliance; and (4) Inconsistency with the City's General Plan. Requirement of a Local Workforce The appellant states that, "The city should require the use of a local workforce to benefit the community's economic development and environment. " Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the City should require that Project to be built using local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor -Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California. Moreover, the appellant states that local workforce policies and requirements benefit the local area economically and mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts. Specifically, the appellant contents that local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. Staff Response: In April 2022, the City of Santa Ana City Council adopted an ordinance repealing and reenacting the City's inclusionary opportunity ordinance. The City's Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO) became effective in May of 2022. The ordinance provides provisions for local skilled and trained workforce requirements. Specifically, Section 41-1904 (c) of the SAMC, states that the use of a local skilled and trained workforce shall be phased in over time and shall only apply to a development project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units opting to exercise the in -lieu fee payment option. Section 41-1904 further states that between November 16, 2021 and December 31, 2025, a project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units exercising the option to pay the 15-dollars per square foot in -lieu fee amount shall not be required to utilize 4 City Council 18 — 1751 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) a local skilled and trained workforce for completing the construction of the project. As previously outlined in this report, the applicant has selected the option to satisfy the AHOCO by paying in -lieu fees in the amount of 15 dollars per square foot. Based on available figures for the project, the project will contribute an estimated $8,043,600 in in -lieu fees, which must be spent on production of affordable housing in the City of Santa Ana (see Table 3 for the calculation methodology). Therefore, the applicant is in compliance with the AHOCO and is not required to provide local skilled and trained workforce. Lastly, the provision of community benefits is not a requirement of CEQA. Further, the Project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures of the Certified EIR. Mitigation measures beyond those required by the Certified EIR are not required unless the Project would result in new or more severe impacts compared to those analyzed in the Certified EIR. The Project's CEQA Findings demonstrate that the Project is consistent with the MEMU and within the scope of the analysis provided in the Certified EIR. II. Training Requirements to Prevent Community Spread Of Covid-19 and Other Infectious Diseases The appellant states that, "The City should impose training requirements for the Project's construction activities to prevent community spread of Covid- 19 and other infectious diseases." Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the City should require that Project to be built using a workforce trained in a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment ("ICRA") protocols. Moreover, the appellant contends that the City should adopt additional requirements to mitigate public health risks from the Project's construction activities such as requiring safe on -site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site. Specifically, the applicant contends that the City should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site. Staff Response: The applicant's request for the Planning Commission to mandate additional public health training is outside of the Planning Commission's purview and outside of their land use powers and duties, as outlined in Section 2-350.2 of the SAMC. Moreover, the request is well outside the scope of CEQA. The Project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures of the Certified EIR. Mitigation measures beyond those required by the Certified EIR are not required unless the Project would result in new or more severe impacts compared to those analyzed in the Certified 5 City Council 18 — 1752 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) EIR. The Project's CEQA Findings demonstrate that the Project is consistent with the MEMU and within the scope of the analysis provided in the Certified EIR. III. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance a. The appellant contends that CEQA mandates preparation of an EIR for projects so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed. Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that a subsequent EIR should have been prepared because there has been substantial changes to the MEMU, and new information of substantial importance has come out since the Certified EIR. Moreover, the appellant cites Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. Staff Response: Staff provides an analysis for why no subsequent EIR would be required, under the SAFER appeal analysis. To summarize, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe significant impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance that has become available that would result in new or more severe significant impacts. Moreover, no subsequent EIR would be required for the Project. Based on the analysis herein and the Certified EIR and the whole of the record, under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, the Certified EIR adequately described the Project activity for purposes of CEQA. b. The appellant contends that there are new transportation impact methodology requirements, not analyzed in the Certified EIR. Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the Certified EIR uses the outdated Level of Service ("LOS") methodology to analyze traffic and transportation impacts. The appellant further states that in July 2020, Senate Bill ("SB") 743 took effect in order to help reduce transportation impacts. Specifically, in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas impacts and create long term sustainability, SB 743 changed the standard for evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA from a LOS standard to Vehicle Miles Traveled ("VMT") standard. Therefore, the appellant concludes that a subsequent EIR analyzing the Project's VMT is necessary in order to adequately assess the Project's transportation impacts. Staff Response: The Project CEQA Findings demonstrate that the Project's potential transportation impacts are within the scope of the 6 City Council 18 — 1753 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) analysis of the Certified EIR, including Exhibit 9G (Project LOS Analysis) and Exhibit 9H (Project VMT Information). As discussed therein, since adoption of the Certified EIR, the LOS metric for analyzing transportation and traffic impacts under CEQA has been replaced with analysis of VMT to address consistency with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). However, recent California case law confirms that CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) only applies prospectively to CEQA documents that have not yet been circulated for public review and not to CEQA documents that rely on previously certified EIRs that complied with applicable CEQA requirements when publicly reviewed. The court in Olen Properties Corporation v. City of Newport Beach (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 270 explicitly recognizes that VMT impacts were known of and understood in 2006 when the EIR in that case was certified (the same year as the original Certified EIR for the MEMU) and therefore do not constitute new information that would trigger recirculation. Thus, a project relying on a previously certified EIR under CEQA Guidelines 15168(c) is not required to provide a VMT analysis if: (1) the previously certified EIR evaluated transportation impacts based on LOS and (2) the subsequent project is within the scope of the impacts assessed in the previously certified EIR and any applicable mitigation measures are adopted. The Certified 2006 EIR was certified well before CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) was adopted and relies on an LOS analysis, not a VMT analysis, to analyze the MEMU's transportation impacts. However, impacts associated with VMT were known of and understood at the time the Certified EIR was certified and therefore do not constitute new information. Moreover, the CEQA findings associated with the Project will not be circulated for public review. Therefore, no VMT analysis is required to evaluate the Project's consistency with the Certified EIR and the City is evaluating such consistency based only on LOS. Nevertheless, a VMT Screening Assessment Memorandum ("Memo") has been produced for the Project for informational purposes only, in response to this comment. The Memo presents the VMT screening criteria, analysis methodology and the conclusion. The approach and methodology outlined in this Memo was consistent with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019), which states that several types of projects can be screened out from a VMT assessment using identified criteria, indicating that these projects have the potential to reduce VMT per service population and result in a less -than -significant transportation impacts. Moreover, this Memo was thoroughly peer reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer, who concluded that the VMT memo prepared for the Project shows the project is screened out from any full VMT analysis. Further, the Traffic Engineer confirmed that the Memo shows that the project is within a HQTA, and it is consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS. City Council 18 — 1754 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) Specifically, the Memo determines that the Project would not result in VMT impacts because it is located within a HQTA, where existing transit service provided by OCTA provides service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during the peak commute hours, and because the proposed land use was consistent with the RTP/SCS as contained in SCAG's adopted Connect SoCal (2020-2045 RTP/SCS). Therefore, in accordance with the City of Santa Ana's guidelines, the proposed Project was deemed to be exempt from the preparation of any further VMT analysis and may be presumed to have a less than significant CEQA-related transportation impact. c. The appellant contends that the Project requires new feasible mitigation measures to mitigate greenhouse gas impacts. Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the Project requires new feasible mitigation measures not specified in the Certified EIR, such as electric vehicle ("EV") parking and charging stations and solar system installation. The appellant further contends that these measures are of particular importance given that the Certified EIR, "failed entirely to assess greenhouse gas ("GHG") impacts." Furthermore, the appellant states that the Certified EIR fails to specify the following: 1) new requirements that residential buildings must designate 10-percent of their parking spaces as EV capable; 2) equip 25-percent of the parking spaces with low power level EV charging receptacles; and 3) and equip 5-percent of the spaces with level EV supply equipment. Finally, the appellant contends that the Certified EIR fails to include a mitigation measure requiring the installation of photovoltaic and battery system, thus a subsequent EIR should have been prepared to specify and incorporate these additional feasible mitigation measures. Staff Response: The topic of GHG emissions impacts was not included in the CEQA Guidelines in place at the time the 2006 EIR was certified, and as such, was not included in the Certified EIR's analysis of the MEMU's potential impacts. However, both the existence of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel combustion and other activities were known at the time the Certified EIR was approved. Since the approval of the Certified EIR, federal and state laws and regulations have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions, and the topic of GHG is included in the current version of the CEQA Guidelines. A detailed analysis of the Project's GHG emissions impacts is included in Exhibit 9 and 9D of this document. As summarized, the Project would not result in any significant impacts related to GHG emissions. Moreover, statutory/regulatory requirements do not need to be repeated as mitigation measures for the Project. The Project would be subject to all applicable solar photovoltaic (PV) and EV parking s City Council 18 — 1755 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) requirements (i.e., statutory requirements) as outlined in the current 2022 California Green Building Code. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a) assists lead agencies in determining the significance of the impacts of GHG emissions, giving them discretion to determine whether to assess impacts quantitatively or qualitatively. The City, Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Office of Planning and Research (OPR), CARB, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), and other applicable agencies have not adopted a numerical threshold of significance for assessing impacts related to GHG emissions. As a result, the methodology for evaluating a project's impacts related to GHG emissions focuses on its consistency with statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions. Exhibit 9 describes the extent to which the Project is consistent with or exceeds the performance -based standards included in the regulations outlined in the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's CAP. Given the Project's substantial consistency with state, SCAG, and City GHG emissions reduction goals and objectives, the Project is consistent with applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG emissions. In the absence of adopted standards and established significance thresholds, and given this consistency, it is concluded that the Project's incremental contribution to GHG emissions and their effects on climate change would not be cumulatively considerable. Further, GHG emissions -related impacts have long been known and understood at the time the Certified EIR was certified, and therefore, does not constitute new information for the purposes of this analysis. d. The appellant contends that the Project may have significant land use impacts which were not analyzed in the Certified EIR. Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that a subsequent EIR should have been prepared because the Project may have significant unanalyzed land use impacts stemming from the Project's request for a tentative tract map ("TTM"). The appellant cites the Section 3.7 (Public Actions and Approvals Required) in the Certified EIR, which states, "This EIR is intended as a Program EIR, and specific development proposals made in the Overlay Zone would be subject to separate environmental clearance/review." For this reason, the appellant contends that a subsequent EIR which specifically analyzes the Project's TTM request in its land use consistency analysis is necessary. 9 City Council 18 — 1756 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) Staff Response: As part of the Project, the applicant is requesting approval of a TTM (County Map No. 19243) to consolidate four existing lots, and create two new legal lots (Parcel 1 and 2), one of which will be subdivided for condominium purposes for the townhome portion of the site. Parcel 1 will include 14,900 square feet of live/work space (19 live/work units) and 449 residential rental units. Parcel 2 will consist of eight 3-story townhome buildings containing a total of 58 residential for sale units. Upon completion of the subdivision, the lots will continue to be utilized for residential use in the form of attached tuck -under unit type structures (townhouse development), and commercial/residential mixed -use (wrap building), consistent with the objectives uses analyzed in the Certified EIR. Pursuant to Section 3.2 (Project Objectives) of the Certified EIR, implementation of the MEMU was intended fulfill the following objectives: • Create an active, mixed -use urban village where it is possible to live, work, shop and play all within a short walk of each other. • Facilitate well -designed new mixed -use development projects that combine residential and nonresidential uses through innovative and flexible design solutions. • Achieve the harmonious integration of new mixed -use development within the existing fabric of the mid -rise and high-rise office environment. • Provide for a mix of housing in order to encourage a continuum of living and a variety of household types. • Allow for the development of varied residential types in a mixed -use configuration including, but not limited to, loft -style units, live/work units, attached row houses, and high -quality stacked flats Moreover, Section 3.3 (Project Description) of the Certified EIR outlines the primary elements in the MEMU, including: A potential increase in City population of 11,102 residents A potential increase in the number of available residences within City limits by 5,551 units The potential development of 1,275,440 gross square feet (gsf) of commercial (retail and service) space, as well as 3,410,507 gsf of office space. This corresponds to a potential net increase of approximately 963,000 sf of commercial space and 690,000 sf of office space beyond existing conditions. As proposed, the TTM is required for the feasibility of the Project in order to provide for the intended mix of uses as envisioned by the City, in accordance with the MEMU and Certified EIR. Pursuant to the California Building Code requirements, no building or structure can be built over 10 City Council 18 — 1757 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) legal property lines to ensure compliance with fire and safety separation requirements. Therefore, approval of the TTM is required in order for the applicant to provide the proposed mixed -use development project. Moreover, the TTM does not allow for the creation off additional units beyond what was previously analyzed in the Certified EIR. The units that would be created under the TTM would be consistent with the Certified EIR objectives, and would allow for multi -family residential townhouses (Parcel 2) and mixed commercial and residential uses (Parcel 1). Based on the above analysis, the Project would be fully consistent with the allowable development under the MEMU and within the scope of the Certified EIR. In addition, all applicable mitigation measures from the Certified EIR would be implemented by the Project, and each of the applicable mitigation measures would also be made conditions of approval for the Project. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe significant impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance that has become available that would result in new or more severe significant impacts. Moreover, no subsequent EIR would be required for the Project. Based on the analysis herein and the Certified EIR and the whole of the record, under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, the Certified EIR adequately described the Project activity for purposes of CEQA. IV. Inconsistency with the General Plan a. The appellant contends that the Project is inconsistent with the General Plan because there are no onsite affordable units. Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the Project "runs afoul to the General Plan" since it does not provide any affordable housing units. The appellant cites General Plan, Policy Open Space (OS- 1.10) which states, "encourage private and commercial recreational facilities that are physically open to the public and are affordable to residents of surrounding neighborhoods, and serve community needs". Moreover, the appellant cites General Plan, Policy Urban Design (UD-2.8) which states, that the City must "explore development and subdivision options that promote new opportunities for sustainable, livable, and affordable development." Finally, the appellant concludes that the Project conflicts with the General Plan as it does not provide affordable housing units, and for that reason the City should have prepared a subsequent EIR to assess the Project's land use impacts. 11 City Council 18 — 1758 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) Staff Response: The Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO) was adopted in 2011, then known as the Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO), and amended in 2015, 2020, and most recently in May of 2022. The ordinance was adopted to implement the City's General Plan Housing Element Goal of providing affordable housing within the City. Since inception, the Inclusionary Housing Fund has generated $28.2 million that has been used to develop new affordable housing, provide emergency shelter, and create homeownership opportunities. A total of 107 affordable housing units have been created, and an additional 86 units have been committed through such fees. The AHOCO outlines various on -site affordable requirements for eligible ownership and rental projects. However, provisions allow for the payment of in -lieu fees rather than building the affordable housing units on -site. The Project would be a market -rate residential development with no units dedicated to affordable housing for lower -income residents. However, the Project would be required to pay an inclusionary housing in -lieu fee, consistent with the City's AHOCO, to further the production of affordable housing units and development within the City. As previously outlined, the Project will contribute an estimated $8,043,600 in in -lieu fees, which must be spent on production of affordable housing in the City of Santa Ana. Moreover, the Project would not remove any housing or affordable housing units. Rather, it would increase the housing stock of market -rate and affordable housing units through payment of an in -lieu fee. The Project would result in a net increase of 507 total units which consists of wide range of housing types, including apartment units at different bedroom counts and townhome style units, consistent with the City's General Plan goals and policies. Therefore, the Project is in compliance with the AHOCO and the City's General Plan Land Use and Housing Element. General Plan Consistency The City's AHOCO, and specifically the in -lieu provisions, are consistent with various goals in policies in the City's General Plan Housing Element (HE), including Goal 2 and 3, and policies HE-2.7, HE-3.1, and HE-3.2, outlined below: Goal 2 — Foster an inclusive community with a diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups. 12 City Council 18 — 1759 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) • Policy HE-2.7 Affordable Component. Pursuant to the Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO), require eligible rental and ownership housing projects to include at least 15 percent of the rental housing units as affordable for low-income households; or 10 percent of the rental units affordable to very low-income households; or 5 percent of rental units affordable to lower income households (5 percent to low-income, 3 percent to very low-income, and 2 percent to extremely low-income households); or at least 5 percent of the units ineligible ownership projects affordable to moderate -income households. Implement various strategies using the in -lieu fees generated by AHOCO to provide a wide array of affordable housing options. Goal 3 — Increase opportunities for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income individuals and families to find affordable housing, and afford a greater choice of rental and homeownership opportunities. • Policy HE-3.1 Rental Assistance. Provide rental assistance for individuals and families with extremely low-, very low-, and low -incomes with funding from the federal government. • Policy HE-3.2 Homeownership. Expand homeownership opportunities for low - and moderate -income residents and workers in Santa Ana through the provision of financial assistance, education, and collaborative partnerships. Lastly, the in -lieu provisions, are consistent with the Item No. 25 in the City's the Housing Implementation Strategy, within the Housing Element, which outlines the following objective: Item No. 25 — Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO) Collect and leverage in -lieu fees with other sources to support the production and/or rehabilitation of affordable housing for extremely low-, 13 City Council 18 — 1760 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) very low-, and low-income families with a goal of funding eight projects for the planning period. Inclusionary Housing Fund Funding for this program is provided using revenues generated through in - lieu fees from the AHOCO. Funds can be used to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to moderate income (120 percent AMI), low- (80 percent AMI), very low- (50 percent AMI) and extremely low-income (30 percent AMI) households in the City. Funds can be used to make loans to eligible borrowers to provide affordable housing. Funds are also being used to provide down payment assistance for first time home buyers. The City has used its inclusionary revenues to fund the development of many of its more recent affordable apartment properties. Inclusionary housing requirements cannot be confiscatory or deprive an owner of a fair and reasonable return. California Gov't Code § 65583(a) requires assessments of the potential and actual constraints on the development of housing. Within that context, it is important for affordable housing programs to be set up to balance the interests of property owners and developers against the public benefit created by the production of affordable housing units. As such, the in -lieu fees above are based on an evaluation of the affordable housing requirements that could be supported from an economic perspective. The results of this analysis were translated into order -of -magnitude estimates of the in -lieu fee amounts that could be charged on a financially feasible basis. 3. Response to Southwest Mountain States Carpenters (SWMSRCC) Letter dated August 17, 2023 Appeal Application No. 2023-03 — SWMSRCC, Letter Dated August 17, 2023 As previously mentioned, the City received a supplemental comment letter on August 17, 2023, from Mitchell M. Tsai, on behalf of the SWMSRCC. Staff notes that this letter is outside of the 10-day appeal period, as outlined in Section 41-645(b) of the SAMC. Therefore, the subsequent appeal items do not satisfy the requirements of SAMC Section 41-645 and should not be considered. Nonetheless, staff has prepared a comprehensive response below on all appeal items received. In the subsequent letter, the appellant is requesting that the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's decision approving SPR No. 2023-01 and TTM No. 2023-03 based on compliance with CEQA. Specifically, the appellant makes outlines the following: (1) That a project -specific EIR should have been prepared to analyze the Project; (2) VMT requirements; (3) Infeasible transportation mitigation requirements in the Certified EIR; (4) Adequate analyzes of noise impacts; (5) GHG impacts; (6) Land use impacts not 14 City Council 18 — 1761 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) analyzed in the Certified EIR; and (7) Inconsistency with the City's General Plan. Staff notes that the following have been previously addressed and will not be discussed further, as no new information was provided: (1) That a project -specific EIR should have been prepared to analyze the Project; (2) VMT requirements; (5) GHG impacts; (6) Land use impacts not analyzed in the Certified EIR; and (7) Inconsistency with the City's General Plan. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance a. The appellant contends that the City's Transportation Mitigation Requirement is infeasible for the Project Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the Project is not consistent with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019). Therefore, the appellant contends that a subsequent EIR must be conducted in order to assess whether the Project can adequately mitigate the Project's transportation impacts and whether the Project conflicts with the City's Resolution. Staff Response: As previously discussed, the Project would not result in any significant LOS impacts, which is the metric utilized in the Certified EIR. Further, the VMT Screening Memo for the Project CEQA Findings, demonstrates, for informational purposes only (and not as a legal requirement), that the Project would not result in significant VMT impacts. Therefore, no VMT-related mitigation measures are required. b. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR fails to adequately analyze the Project's noise impacts. Specifically, the appellant contends that the Certified EIR fails to identify all nearby sensitive receptors. Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the Certified EIR does not adequately describe the environmental setting because it fails to capture all of the nearby sensitive receptors. Specifically, the appellant contends that although the Certified EIR identifies a total of 15 nearby sensitive receptors, the locations selected are almost all on busy streets or close to freeways, and therefore do not represent quieter locations that are set back and/or shielded from major traffic routes. Thus, the appellant contends that a subsequent EIR must be prepared to assess ambient noise conditions for receivers further away from major traffic routes and/or shielded by intervening structures such as the Lake Diane apartment complex. Staff Response: The Certified EIR analyzed potential noise impacts at 15 sensitive receptors. While the nearest sensitive uses vary at different locations in and around the MEMU, and as specific development plans had 15 City Council 18 — 1762 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) not yet been determined at individual sites at the time the Certified EIR was prepared, it was assumed that sensitive receptors could be as close as 50 feet from where construction would take place. The comment alleges that impacts to the Lake Dianne Apartments were not analyzed. However, the Lake Dianne Apartments are located 80 feet away from the Project Site, greater than the 50 feet assumed as the nearest sensitive receptor by the Certified EIR. Thus, the potential impacts to the Lake Dianne Apartments are within the scope of those analyzed by the Certified EIR. In June 2023, DKA Planning, an expert noise consulting firm, took short- term noise measurements near the Project site to determine the current ambient noise conditions near the four nearest sensitive receptors: Cabrillo Park, 2001 E. 4th Street, the southeast corner of 4th Street and Cabrillo Park Drive, and 618 Sherry Lane. The residence at 724 N. Parkcenter within the Lake Dianne Apartments is assumed to have the same ambient noise conditions as Cabrillo Park given its immediate proximity to Cabrillo Park and similarity in surrounding uses. For reference, Exhibit 9F (Noise Technical Report) outlines the Project CEQA Findings. Regarding construction, the Project would comply with SAMC Section 18- 314 and construction activities would be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Monday through Saturday, and would be prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. Exhibit 9F demonstrates that construction of the Project would not increase ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by more than 5 A -weighted decibels (dBA), and thus would not result significant noise impacts, including to the closest residence of the Lake Dianne Apartments. Furthermore, Exhibit 9F demonstrates that Project operation, including noise associated with mechanical and landscaping equipment, vehicles, outdoor and recreational uses, and trash and recycling services, would not increase ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by more than 5 dBA, and thus would not result in significant noise impacts, including to the closest residence of the Lake Dianne Apartments. Further, the Project would also implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9- 1 through MM-OZ 4.9-7 of the Certified EIR to protect residential receptors and to minimize construction and operational noise and vibration levels. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to substantial temporary or permanent increase in noise and vibration beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. c. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR fails to adequately characterize ambient noise conditions. 16 City Council 18 — 1763 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the Certified EIR does not identify sensitive receptors. Moreover, they contend that the Certified EIR fails to adequately characterize ambient noise conditions. Therefore, the appellant contends that a subsequent EIR must be prepared to adequately characterize the ambient noise conditions by: (1) conducting 24-hour baseline noise measurements at locations selected to represent baseline ambient noise conditions at all sensitive receivers around the Project site; and (2) conducting continuous monitoring or, at a minimum, conducting 15- minute readings at 9AM — 5PM (daytime); 8PM — 10PM (evening); and 1AM — 3AM (nighttime). Staff Response: First, this comment essentially challenges the adequacy of the Certified EIR analysis by making allegations about how the ambient noise measurements were taken. However, any challenge to the Certified EIR is untimely. The Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk and posted on March 23, 2007, and the statute of limitations closed in April 2007, and any challenge to the Certified EIR must have been filed before then. Second, this comment does not present any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Nonetheless, in June 2023, DKA Planning took short-term noise measurements near the Project site to determine the current ambient noise conditions near the four nearest sensitive receptors: Cabrillo Park, 2001 E. 4th Street, the southeast corner of 4th Street and Cabrillo Park Drive, and 618 Sherry Lane. The residence at 724 N. Parkcenter within the Lake Dianne Apartments is assumed to have the same ambient noise conditions as Cabrillo Park given its immediate proximity to Cabrillo Park and similarity in surrounding uses. Noise measurements were taken on a weekday afternoon using a Quest Technologies Sound Examiner SE-400 Meter that complies with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) for general environmental measurement instrumentation. In the absence of a protocol for establishing ambient noise levels for construction analyses, 15-minute measurements were used to characterize typical noise levels during hours when construction is likely to occur. No construction will occur at night. As the major source of ambient noise in the area (traffic) was stable, 15-minute durations were deemed to be sufficient to characterize ambient noise levels. d. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR's significance threshold is inadequate. Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that CEQA Guidelines require that both temporary/periodic and permanent noise 17 City Council 18 — 1764 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) impacts be identified and addressed. However, the thresholds of significance proposed in the Certified EIR would apply to operational (i.e. permanent) noise impacts only. Moreover, the appellant states that the Certified EIR contends that noise level increases less than 5 dba are insignificant so long as the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) at sensitive receptors is below 65 dba. However, the appellant contends that it would be possible for noise from the Project to exceed the allowed limits according to the SAMC while remaining well below the proposed CNEL 65 significance threshold. Therefore, the appellant contends that a subsequent EIR must be prepared which revises the threshold of significance as follows: Any temporary or permanent noise impact resulting from the Project shall be considered significant if either one of the following conditions apply: (1) the Project results in noise levels in excess of standards established in the SAMC or General Plan; or (2) the Project results in a noise level increase of 5 dBA or more. Staff Response: First, this comment essentially challenges the adequacy of the Certified EIR analysis by making allegations about the significance thresholds used. However, any challenge to the Certified EIR is untimely. The Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk and posted on March 23, 2007 and the statute of limitations closed in April 2007, and any challenge to the Certified EIR must have been filed before then. Second, this comment does not present any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Nonetheless, Exhibit 9F analyzes both the Project's noise impacts, both construction and operation. The analysis utilizes the same significance threshold as the Certified EIR, a 5 dBA over ambient threshold for construction impacts and a 5 dBA over ambient threshold for operational impacts. Regarding construction, the Project would comply with SAMC Section 18- 314 and construction activities would be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Monday through Saturday, and would be prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. Exhibit 9F demonstrates that construction of the Project would not increase ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by more than 5 dBA, and thus would not result significant noise impacts, including to the closest residence of the Lake Dianne Apartments. Regarding operation, Exhibit 9F demonstrates that Project operation, including noise associated with mechanical and landscaping equipment, vehicles, outdoor and recreational uses, and trash and recycling services, would not increase ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by more than 5 dBA, and thus would not result in significant noise impacts, 18 City Council 18 — 1765 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) including to the closest residence of the Lake Dianne Apartments. Additionally, the Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM-OZ 4.9- 1 through MM-OZ 4.9-7 of the Certified EIR to protect residential receptors and to minimize construction and operational noise and vibration levels. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to substantial temporary or permanent increase in noise and vibration beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. e. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR's construction noise analysis and mitigation measures must be revised. Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the characterization of construction noise impacts in the Certified EIR as less than significant, is inconsistent with the CEQA Guidelines since implementation of the MEMU would result in a significant adverse impact on noise. Furthermore, the appellant contends that the Certified EIR's imposed mitigation measure for constriction noise impacts are improperly deferred since they are vague in nature and would likely be difficult or impossible to enforce in practice. Therefore, the appellant contends that a subsequent EIR must be prepared to adequately analyze and mitigate the Project's construction impacts. Staff Response: First, this comment essentially challenges the adequacy of the Certified EIR analysis by making allegations about the significance conclusions and mitigation measures. However, any challenge to the Certified EIR is untimely. The Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk and posted on March 23, 2007 and the statute of limitations closed in April 2007, and any challenge to the Certified EIR must have been filed before then. Second, this comment does not present any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. Further, the Project's ability to implement the Certified EIR mitigation measures demonstrates that the measures are not vague and impossible to enforce. In fact the mitigation measures cited by this comment are standard best management practices that are regularly implemented in development projects and will be adopted as mandatory project conditions of approval. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to substantial temporary or permanent increase in noise and vibration beyond impacts already identified in the Certified EIR. f. The appellant contends that the Certified EIR's operation noise analysis underestimates the Project's impacts 19 City Council 18 — 1766 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) Summary of Appeal Reasoning: The appellant contends that the certified EIR's operation noise analysis and mitigation measures must be revised as the analysis presented in the Certified EIR does not adequately demonstrate that HVAC noise associated with the Project will be less than significant. Therefore, the appellant contends that a subsequent EIR must be prepared which: (1) revises the operational noise impact analysis; (2) includes an evaluation of Project design features that would be incorporated into the building design; (3) includes revised analysis; (4) includes the outdoor amenities in the operational noise impact analysis; and (5) supplements the operational noise mitigation measures as necessary. Staff Response: This comment essentially challenges the adequacy of the Certified EIR analysis by making allegations about the operational noise impact analysis. However, any challenge to the Certified EIR is untimely. The Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk and posted on March 23, 2007 and the statute of limitations closed in April 2007, and any challenge to the Certified EIR must have been filed before then. Further, this comment does not present any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, that the Project would result in any new or more significant impacts than analyzed in the Certified EIR or that new mitigation is required. As described in Exhibit 9F, noise impacts from rooftop mechanical equipment on nearby sensitive receptors would be negligible. First, most modern heat pumps are relatively quiet, with sound ratings of up to 60 decibels, equivalent to normal human conversation. Second, there would be no line -of -sight from these rooftop units to the sensitive receptors. Because the sensitive uses near the Project Site are one- to three -stories in height, there would be no sound path from the mechanical equipment to receptors that would be 20 to 45 feet lower than the roof of the Project. Third, the presence of the Project's roof edge creates an effective noise barrier that further reduces noise levels from rooftop HVAC units by 8 dBA or more. A parapet would further shield sensitive receptors near the Project Site. These design elements would be helpful in managing noise. For the townhomes, outdoor mechanical equipment for heating and cooling for each residence would likely be located on the ground level of each unit. This could include a ground -mounted heat pump that would generate noise during both heating and cooling sessions while air conditioners operate during cooling cycles. This equipment would include a number of sound sources, including compressors, condenser fans, supply fans, return fans, and exhaust fans. These units could be rated to generate a sound power between 51 and 76 dBA. Any off -site sensitive receptors would not experience elevated noise levels without a direct line -of -sight to these units. Given their location near each residence, any sound path from these units would be attenuated by the presence of the townhomes and structures in the Project, as well as the distance to off -site receptors (i.e., Cabrillo Park 20 City Council 18 — 1767 10/3/2023 Exhibit 10 - Response to Appeal Comments Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project (1901 E. Fourth Street) to the north, Lake Dianne Apartments to the northeast). As a result, noise from HVAC units would negligibly elevate ambient noise levels, far less than the 5 dBA CNEL threshold of significance for operational impacts. Regarding potential impacts related to composite outdoor uses, Exhibit 9F explains that the primary use of these spaces would be for human conversation, which would produce negligible noise increases. There are no amplified noise sources proposed at the Project. Vocal intensity increases about 0.38 dB for every 1.0 dB increase in noise levels above 55 dB. For example, the sound of a human voice at 60 dB would produce a noise level of 39 dB at ten feet, which would not elevate ambient noise levels at any of the analyzed sensitive receptors by more than 0.2 dBA Leq. Moreover, noise levels from human speech would attenuate rapidly with greater distance, resulting in a 33 dB noise level at twenty feet, and 27 dB at 40 feet. Table 9 in Exhibit 9F demonstrates that Project operation, including noise associated with outdoor and recreational uses, would not increase ambient noise levels, and therefore would not result in significant noise impacts. 21 City Council 18 — 1768 10/3/2023