HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO2306_419 E Wellington AveFREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 1 of 9
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING
THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 419 EAST WELLINGTON
AVENUE (HISTORIC EXTERIOR MODIFICATION
APPLICATION NO. 2023-05)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby
finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. Duane Rohrbacher, Jr. and Shannon Qhihuiz (“Applicants”) are requesting
approval of Historic Exterior Modification Application No. 2023-05 to allow
exterior modifications to the property at 419 East Wellington Avenue,
historically known as the Titchenel-Catland House.
B. The legal owners of the property are Duane Paul Rohrbacher, Jr., a single
man and Shannon Dominique Quihuiz, a single woman as joint tenants.
C. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit
A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.
D. The Titchenel-Catland House is individually listed as No. 138 on the Santa
Ana Register of Historical Properties and categorized as “Key” in 1997.
E. The Titchenel-Catland House was originally built in 1887 and is
architecturally significant as a Victorian Italianate Style residence. In the
early to mid-1920s, the Titchenel-Catland underwent a remodel that added
Craftsman Bungalow elements. These Craftsman style alterations have
acquired historic significance in their own right. Character-defining exterior
features of the Titchenel-Catland House that should be preserved include,
but may not be limited to, the Victorian elements (elongated windows and
doors, prominent bay window, wide shiplap siding trimmed with corner
boards), the gable roof, single exposed beam-ends, rafter tails, and
louvered vents, representative of the Craftsman Bungalow style.
F. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 30-6, no exterior physical
modifications, other than those identified by the Historic Resources
Commission for administrative approval by city staff, shall be permitted with
respect to a historic structure until the Historic Resources Commission
approves such request at a duly noticed public hearing and issues a
certificate of appropriateness. The Historic Resources Commission shall
issue the certificate of appropriateness upon finding that the proposed
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 2 of 9
modification(s) does not substantially change the character and integrity of
the historic property.
G. The proposed exterior modifications to the two-story, single-family
residence consist of a partial rehabilitation of an existing, deteriorating front
porch at the building’s primary (south) façade. The porch will undergo
foundation repairs and reinforcement; non-original Craftsman style porch
elements that were added during the early to mid-1920s remodel will be
removed and replaced by a simple, compatible porch design; compatible
porch features that are in disrepair will be maintained and repaired in-kind;
and conjectural architectural features that have been added over time and
are not compatible with the historic property will be removed.
H. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 30-6, the Historic
Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 6, 2023,
for the request for exterior modifications to the Titchenel-Catland House.
I. Since the property is deemed a historic structure, all exterior modifications
are required to meet the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.
1. The following Secretary of Interior’s Standards are applicable:
i. The project complies with Standard No. 1. The property
currently maintains its historic use as a single-family
residence. The use is not proposed to change. The interior
configuration will remain the same with minimal changes to
the front porch design to address structural and safety
concerns, while simultaneously removing inappropriate, non-
original features.
ii. The project complies with Standard No. 2. The historic
character of the subject property will be retained and
preserved. The proposed porch rehabilitation has been
designed to maintain existing, compatible porch materials and
remove only non-original and conjectural features. Although
the proposed rehabilitation will alter the primary (south)
elevation, the existing porch is not original to the original
Victorian Italianate style residence built in 1887, as it
underwent a 1920s Craftsman style porch remodel and has
since been altered over time. The proposed rehabilitation will
provide a more compatible porch design that does not
introduce new Victorian Italianate and Craftsman style
elements. The proposed exterior alterations will not alter any
important spatial relationships that characterize the property
as the porch has been altered overtime.
iii. The project complies with Standard No. 3. The proposed
changes will not create a false sense of historical
development. The proposed rehabilitation will read as a
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 3 of 9
simplistic design in comparison to the existing Victorian
Italianate and Craftsman style single-family residence. The
existing, deteriorating front porch will be redesigned to include
thinner porch posts with a new, third post, to provide visual
symmetry to the entrance. The new porch post will contain no
new ornamentation to be confused with existing original
building features, and will be distinct enough to discern that it
is new construction. Moreover, the project includes the
removal of conjectural features, including the existing corbel
at the porch’s eastern terminus, the two window consoles
inner brow ornamentation at the double-window of the south
façade, and window lintel.
iv. The project complies with Standard No. 4. The Craftsman
style porch remodel in the 1920s removed the building’s early
Victorian Italianate style porch entirely and expanded the
porch footprint to the building’s southwest corner. The
expanded porch, constructed approximately 100 years ago,
has acquired historic significance in its own right as it was
designed in relation with the building’s overall Craftsman style
alterations. However, the porch has since been altered
numerous times. The porch piers, posts, and header are not
appropriately sized to the residence and they are severely
deteriorated. The proposed project will improve upon the
1920’s remodel to be more compatible with the historic
residence by introducing new porch posts with a thinner
diameter and a third porch post to frame the porch entrance
and provide symmetry to the building. The porch header
(below the cornice) and railing will be removed to provide a
cleaner design that opens the porch and creates better
visibility of the residence. The existing porch skirt, which is not
original and deteriorated, will be removed and replaced with a
compatible skirt in a similar design as the existing.
Additionally, conjectural items that have no historic
significance will be removed. The project will not remove any
significant features that acquired historic significance in their
own right, such as the porch roof and cornice, decking, and
massing.
v. The project complies with Standard No. 5. Distinctive
materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or
examples of craftsmanship that characterize the property will
be preserved. Although the project proposes altering the front
porch, the majority of items to be altered will be either repaired
or replaced like-for-like given the amount of deterioration. The
porch posts, which are not original and deteriorated, will be
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 4 of 9
redesigned to reflect a compatible, simple design. The porch
railing, which is also not original and in disrepair, will be
removed entirely. The porch header is not compatible and will
be removed.
vi. The project complies with Standard No. 6. Deteriorated
historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where
the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a
distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in
design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. The
non-original porch posts and railing are so severely
deteriorated with wood rot and missing wood pieces that it has
become a structural hazard. The porch posts will be removed
entirely and redesigned to reflect a compatible, simple design
that better suites the historic property, which has been altered
over time.
The deteriorating porch decking has holes and wood rot. It will
undergo like-for-like spot repair with T6 Doug Fir wood to
match the existing decking. The existing 12-inch horizontal
wood band immediately above the porch skirt (at the south
and west facades) is not original and does not accurately
match the existing band to the east of the porch steps (pieces
of wood overlap on the south façade and the band is bent and
deteriorated at the west façade). The band will be fully
replaced to match the existing band that is to the east of the
porch steps. The porch skirt is not original and severely
deteriorated. The skirt will be fully removed and replaced with
a new skirt in a similar style, featuring vertical slats made out
of redwood material to match existing. The new skirt slats will
be two inches wider than existing and will be spaced apart to
allow for airflow. Two new porch vents (which are part of the
porch skirt) will be replaced like-for-like in the same locations.
A small area immediately east of the porch steps on the south
façade will also receive a new horizontal band and porch skirt
to cover existing exposed brick at the foundation, and
continue the porch skirt design at the porch’s eastern
terminus. Although this design is not based on documentary
evidence, the porch and entire building have been largely
altered over time and the new band and skirt will provide cover
to the exposed foundation while unifying the overall porch
design.
vii. The project complies with Standard No. 9. The front porch
rehabilitation will not destroy historic materials or features. All
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 5 of 9
porch materials and features in need of full replacement
(porch band, skirt, and posts) will be replaced with the same
materials as existing, and those needing in-kind repair (porch
decking) will be repaired with matching materials. The existing
porch skirt is not original and therefore the new skirt will
feature slightly wider posts that will be compatibly designed
with the overall porch. Although the deteriorated posts and
piers will be removed entirely, the new posts will replace the
old in the same location (with the addition of a third new post
to provide symmetry) and will provide a more compatible
porch design with thinner post width to better match the
residence. Important spatial relationships characterizing the
Victorian Italianate and Craftsman style residence will not be
disturbed, as the rehabilitation will not add or remove building
or porch square footage. The new porch posts will be
differentiated from the historic building in that they will not
contain Victorian Italianate ornamentation or be overtly
Craftsman in style, however their simplistic design will be
compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale
and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the
property and its environment.
viii. The project complies with Standard No. 10. The proposed
project is considered generally reversible, as it is confined to
the exterior porch only. It also does not remove essential
aspects of the building’s form and materials. Although the
proposed rehabilitation will be at the primary façade, the
alterations are largely focused on repairing and replacing
existing materials and avoids altering the most significant and
character-defining features. The essential form of the house
and the vast majority of its historic materials will remain
unimpaired.
ix. Standards 7-8 are not applicable. No features of this
description would be affected by this Project.
Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the
recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31, as
this action is designed in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards.
Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-49 will
be filed for this project.
Section 3. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana after
conducting the public hearing hereby approves the Certificate of Appropriateness for
Historic Exterior Modification Application No. 2023-05, as conditioned in Exhibit B,
attached hereto and incorporated herein. The Historic Resources Commission finds that
the proposed modifications do not substantially change the character and integrity of the
historic property. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 6 of 9
hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Staff Report and exhibits attached thereto
and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 4. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to
file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder’s Office after the adoption
of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029.
ADOPTED this 6th day of July 2023.
__________________________
Tim Rush
Chairperson
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 7 of 9
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:________________________
John M. Funk
Chief Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Commission members: Alberta Christy, Manuel J. Escamilla, Ginelle
Hardy, Edwards Murashie, Tim Rush (5)
NOES: Commission members___________________________________
ABSTAIN: Commission members___________________________________
NOT PRESENT: Commission members: Daniel Cornelius, Irma P. Jauregui, Dwayne
Shipp (3)
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, NUVIA OCAMPO, Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached
Resolution No. 2023-06 to be the original resolution adopted by Historic Resources
Commission of the City of Santa Ana on July 6, 2023.
Date: ________________ ____________________________________
Nuvia Ocampo
Commission Secretary
City of Santa Ana
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 8 of 9
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APN Address Legal Description Owner Names
398-028-11 419 East Wellington
Avenue
REAL PROPERTY IN THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA,
COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 5 OF TITCHENAL'S
ADDITION TO SANTA ANA, IN
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA,
COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN' BOOK 6,
PAGE 49 OF
MISCELLANEOUS
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY.
Duane
Rohrbacher, Jr.
and Shannon
Quihuiz
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-06
Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT B
Conditions of Approval for Historic Exterior Modification Application (HEMA)
No. 2023-05
The Applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below prior to
exercising the rights conferred by the Historic Resource Commission’s approval
and the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section
30-6 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The Applicant must remain in
compliance with all conditions listed below:
1. The applicant shall regularly maintain all landscaping in the front yard
so that the historic building and its character defining features
(elongated windows and doors, prominent bay window, wide shiplap
siding trimmed with corner boards), the gable roof, single exposed
beam-ends, rafter tails, and louvered vents representative of the
Craftsman Bungalow style) are visible from the public right-of-way.
2. Prior to building permit issuance and prior to installation, the applicant
shall work with City staff to determine the exact materials and finishes
to be used for the proposed work to ensure quality and compatibility.