HomeMy WebLinkAboutNS-2039 - Approving and Adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, * IENDED EY: ORD/RESO
..... _?._o -- _Z_'-/- ......
ORDINANCE NO. NS-2039
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA
-- ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL
CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
REL:mb(6A)
10/16/89
Rev. 10/17/89
333,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Findings and Determinations
a. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana has received
frc~ the Community Redevelopment Commission (the "Commission")
and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana (the
"Agency") the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor
Redevelopment Project, a copy of which is on file at the office
of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California,
and at the office of the Agency at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa
Ana, California, together with the Report of the Commission
including the reasons for the selection of the Project Area, a
description of the physical, social and economic conditions exist-
ing in the Project Area, the proposed method of financing the
redevelopment of the Project Area, a plan for the relocation of
families and persons who may be temporarily or permanently dis-
placed from housing facilities in the Project Area, an analysis of
the Preliminary Plan, the report and recommendations of the Plan-
ning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, a Project Area Committee
record, an environmental impact report on the Redevelopment Plan,
the report of the county fiscal officer and the Commission's
analysis thereof, a summary of consultations with taxing agencies,
and a neighborhood impact report; and
b. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana has
submitted to the City Council its report and recommendations con-
cerning the Redevelopment Plan and its certification that the
Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City of
Santa Ana.
c. The Commission on April 5, 1988 held a duly noticed
public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"),
prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the Guidelines
for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
(14 Cal. Adm. Code Section 15000 et seq.) and environmental pro-
cedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto; and the Draft
EIR was thereafter revised and supplemented to incorporate com-
ments received and responses thereto, and, as so revised and
supplemented, a Final EIR was prepared by the Commission; and
334
ORDINANCE NO. NS- 2039
PAGE TWO
d. The Commission by its Resolution No. 88-19, adopted
December 20, 1988, has certified the adequacy of the Final
Environmental Impact Report, submitted pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21151 and Health and Safety Code Section
33352.
e. The City Council, the Agency, and the Commission held
a joint public hearing on October 17, 1989 on adoption of the
Redevelopment Plan in the Santa Ana City Council Chambers, 20
Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California.
f. Notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published
in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation
in the City of Santa Ana, once a week for four successive weeks
prior to the date of said hearing, and a copy of said notices
and affidavits of publication are on file with the City Clerk,
the Commission and the Agency; and
g. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mail-
ed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the last
known address of each assessee as shown on the last equalized
assessment roll of the County of Orange for each parcel of land
in the Project Area.
h. Each assessee in the Project Area whose property would
be subject to acquisition by purchase or condemnation under the
provisions of the Redevelopment Plan was sent a separate state-
ment to such effect attached to the notice of the joint public
hearing, including a map and legal description of the Project
Area; and
i. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were
mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the
governing body of each taxing agency which receives taxes from
property in the Project Area.
j. The City Council has considered the report and recom-
mendation of the Planning Commission, the report and recommen-
dation of the Project Area Committee, the report of the Community
Redevelopment Commission, the Redevelopment Plan and an analysis
of its economic feasibility, and the environmental impact report,
has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, has
received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for
or against any and all aspects of the Redevelopment Plan, and has
made written findings in response to each written objection re-
ceived from an affected property owner or taxing entity.
335
ORDINANCE NO. NS-2039
PAGE THREE
SECTION 2. Purpose and Intent The purpose and intent of
the City Council with respect to the Project Area is to accomp-
lish the following:
The reduction and prevention of blight or the reloca-
tion of blight (within or outside the redevelopment
project boundaries) and the conservation, rehabilita-
tion and redevelopment of the Project Area in accord
with the General Plan, specific plans, the Redevelop-
ment Plan and local codes and ordinances.
The widening and improvement of Bristol Street in
accordance with the Orange County Regional Highway
Plan and the Circulation Element of the Santa Ana
General Plan.
The promotion of new and continuing private sector
investment within the Project Area to prevent .the
loss of and to facilitate the capture of commercial
sales activity.
The achievement of an environment reflecting a high
level of concern for architectural, landscape and
urban design and land use principles appropriate for
attainment of the objectives of this Redevelopment
Plan.
The retention and expansion of as many existing busi-
nesses as possible by means of redevelopment and re-
habilitation activities and by encouraging and assist-
ing the cooperation and participation of owners, busi-
nesses and public agencies in the revitalization of
the Project Area.
The provision for increased sales, business license,
and other fees, taxes and revenues to the City of
Santa Ana.
The creation and development of local job opportuni-
ties and the preservation of the area's existing
employment base.
The replanning, redesign and development of areas
which are stagnant or improperly utilized. Any General
Plan and/or land use changes made by the City within
the Project Area shall be brought to the Project Area
Committee for their comment.
33 6
ORDINANCE NO. NS-2039
PAGE FOUR
e
The elimination or amelioration of certain environ-
mental deficiencies, including substandard vehicular
circulation systems; inadequate water, sewer and
storm drainage systems; insufficient off-street park-
ing; and other similar public improvements, facilities
and utilities deficiencies adversely affecting the
Project Area.
10.
The expansion of the community's supply of housing,
(inside or outside the Project Area), including oppor-
tunities for low and moderate-income households.
11.
The mandatory reduction of the City's annual costs of
the provision of local services to and within the Pro-
ject Area.
12.
The housing stock and neighborhood integrity shall be
protected from adverse consequences associated with
new development and/or redevelopment.
13.
The actions taken as part of the Bristol Corridor
Redevelopment Project Area shall not displace exist-
ing social blight to another part of the City.
SECTION 3. Further Findings and Determinations The City
Council hereby finds and determines, based on substantial evi-
dence in the record, including, but not limited to, the Com-
mission's report to the City Council on the proposed Redevelop-
ment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, and
all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony
received at the joint public hearings on adoption of the Rede-
velopment Plan held on October 17, 1989, that:
a) The Project Area is a blighted area, the redevelop-
ment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes de-
clared in the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and
Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.). This finding is based on
the following conditions which characterize the Project Area:
(1) The existence of buildings and structures used or
intended to be used for living, commercial, industrial or other
purposes which are unfit or unsafe to occupy for such purposes
due to deterioration and dilapidation, age and obsolescence,
mixed character of buildings, faulty interior arrangement and
exterior spacing, and defective design and character of physical
construction; and
ORDINANCE NO. NS-2039
PAGE FIVE
(2) The existence of properties which suffer from
deterioration and disuse because of: inadequate public improve-
ments, facilities and utilities, which cannot be remedied by
private or governmental action without redevelopment, particu-
larly deficiencies in the transportation and circulation systems,
storm drainage, water and sewer systems, public utilities, and
the existence of parcels that are of irregular form, shape, or
size for proper usefulness and development; and
(3) A prevalence of social maladjustment; and
(4) A prevalence of impaired investments, and economic
maladjustment.
Such conditions are causing and will increasingly
cause a reduction and lack of proper utilization of the area to
such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social and
economic burden on the City which cannot reasonably be expected
to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone,
requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety
and general welfare of the people of the City and the State.
This finding is based on the fact that governmental action avail-
able to the city without redevelopment would be insufficient to
cause any significant correction of the blighting conditions, and
that the nature and costs of the public improvements and facili-
ties and other actions required to correct the blighting con-
ditions are beyond the capacity of the City and cannot be under-
taken or borne by private enterprise, acting alone or in con-
cert with available governmental action.
b) The Project Area is an urbanized area. This find-
ing is based upon the fact that not less than eighty percent (80%
of the privately owned property in the Project Area has been or
is developed for urban uses, as demonstrated by the Commission's
Report to City Council. In addition, as demonstrated by the Com-
mission's Report to City Council, the Project Area is part of an
area developed for urban uses.
c) The Redevelopment Plan will redevelop the Project
Area in conformity with the Community Redevelopment Law and in
the interests of the public peace, health, safety and welfare.
This finding is based upon the fact that the purposes of the
Community Redevelopment Law would be attained by the Project:
by the elimination of areas suffering from economic dislocation
or disuse; by the replanning, redesign and/or redevelopment of
areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized, and which could
not be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without
338
ORDINANCE NO. NS-2039
PAGE S IX
public participation and assistance; by protecting and promot-
ing sound development and redevelopment of blighted areas and
the general welfare of the citizens of the City by remedying
such injurious conditions through appropriate means; and through
the installation of new, or replacement of existing public im-
provements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently
inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities
and utilities.
d) The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelop-
ment Plan is economically sound and feasible. This finding is
based on the fact that under the Redevelopment Plan the Agency
will be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential
financing resources, including tax increments; that the nature
and timing of public redevelopment assistance will depend on
the amount and availability of such financing resources, includ-
ing tax increments, generated by new investment in the Project
Area; that under the Redevelopment Plan no public redevelopment
activity can be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate
that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity; and that
the financing plan included within the Commission's Report to
the City Council demonstrates that sufficient financial resources
will be available to carry out the Project.
e) The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General
Plan of the City of Santa Ana. This finding is based on the
finding of the Planning Commission that the Redevelopment Plan
conforms to the General Plan for the City of Santa Ana.
f) The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan will
promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City
of Santa Ana and will effectuate the purposes and policies of
the Community Redevelopment Law. This finding is based on the
fact that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area by correct-
ing conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private
actions to stimulate development and improve the economic, social
and physical conditions of the Project Area, and by increasing
employment opportunities within the City.
g) The condemnation of real property, as provided
for in the redevelopment Plan, is necessary to the execution of
the Redevelopment Plan, and adequate provisions have been made
for the payment for property to be acquired as provided by law.
This finding is based upon the need to ensure that the provisions
of the Redevelopment Plan will be carried out and to prevent the
recurrence of blight, and the fact that no property will be
acquired until adequate funds are available to pay full compen-
sation therefor.
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE SEVEN
NS-2039
339
h) The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the
relocation of families and persons who might be displaced, tempo-
rarily or permanently from housing facilities in the Project
Area. This finding is based upon the fact that the Redevelopment
Plan provides for relocation assistance according to law and the
fact that such assistance, including relocation payments, consti-
tutes a feasible method for relocation.
i) There are, or are being provided, within the Pro-
ject Area or within other areas not generally less desirable
with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facili-
ties and at rents or prices within the financial means of the
families and persons who might be displaced from the Project Area,
decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number
of and available to such displaced families and persons and reason-
ably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is
based upon the fact that no person or family will be required to
move from any dwelling unit until suitable replacement housing is
available for occupancy, and that such housing must meet the stan-
dards established in State law and regulations.
j) Inclusion of any lands, buildings, or improve-
ments which are not detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare is necessary for the effective redevelopment of the entire
area of which they are a part, and any such area is not included
solely for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax incre-
ment revenues from such area pursuant to Section 33670 of the
Community Redevelopment Law without other substantial justifica-
tion for its inclusion. This finding is based upon the fact that
the boundaries of the Project Area were chosen as a unified and
consistent whole to include contiguous lands that were under-
utilized because of blighting influences, or that were affected
by the existence of blighting influences, and those land uses
which significantly contribute to the conditions of blight, and
whose inclusion is necessary to either accomplish the objectives
and benefits of the Redevelopment Plan or because of the need to
impose uniform requirements. Such properties will share in the
benefits of the Project.
k) The elimination of blight and the redevelopment
of the Project Area could not reasonably be expected to be accom-
plished by private enterprise acting alone without the aid and
assistance of the Agency. This finding is based upon the exist-
ence of blighting influences, including the lack of adequate
public improvements and facilities, and the inability of individ-
ual owners and developers to economically remove these blighting
influences without substantial public assistance.
340
ORDINANCE NO. NS- 2039
PAGE EIGHT
1) The effect of tax increment financing will not
cause a significant financial burden or detriment to any taxing
agency deriving revenues from the Project Area. This finding is
based upon the fact that all affected taxing agencies were con-
sulted with or had the opportunity to be consulted with regarding
the fiscal effects of the Redevelopment Plan, and the fact that
with regard to certain taxing agencies, the Agency has or will
enter into fiscal detriment alleviation agreements under which
it will make payments to such agencies to alleviate identified
financial burden or detriment.
SECTION 4. The City Council is satisfied that permanent hous-
ing facilities will be available within three years from the time
residential occupants of the Project Area, are displaced, and
that pending the development of such facilities, there will be
available to any such displaced residential occupants temporary
housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City of
Santa Ana at the time of their displacement. No persons or fami-
lies of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences
unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and
ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents
comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such
housing units shall be suitable to the needs for such displaced
persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and other-
wise standard dwellings. The Agency shall not displace any such
persons or families until such housing units are available and
ready for occupancy.
SECTION 5. Written objections from affected property owners
and taxing entities to the Redevelopment Plan filed with the
City Clerk and all written and oral objections presented to the
City Council at the hearing have been considered and are hereby
overruled.
SECTION 6. That certain document entitled "Final Environ-
mental Impact Report for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Pro-
ject,'' a copy of which is on file in the office of the Agency,
in the office of the Commission, and in the office of the City
Clerk, having been duly reviewed and considered, is hereby incor-
porated into this Ordinance by reference and made a part hereof.
All activities undertaken by the Commission, the Agency and/or
the City of Santa Ana pursuant to or in implementation of the
Redevelopment Plan shall be undertaken in accordance with the
mitigation measures set forth in said Final Environmental Impact
Report, and the Agency shall undertake such additional environ-
ORDINANCE NO. NS- 2039
PAGE NINE
mental reviews as necessary at the time of implementation of
such activities. In order to ensure compliance with such miti-
gation measures during implementation of the Bristol Corridor
Redevelopment Project, the Reporting/Monitoring Program set
forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, is hereby approved and adopted.
SECTION 7. That certain document entitled "Redevelopment
Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project," the map
contained therein, and such other reports as are incorporated
therein by reference, a copy of which is on file in the office
of the Agency, in the office of the Commission, and the office
of the City Clerk, having been duly reviewed and considered, is
hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a
part hereof, and as so incorporated is hereby designated, approv-
ed, and adopted as the official "Redevelopment Plan for the
Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project."
SECTION 8. In order to implement and facilitate the effectu-
ation of the Redevelopment Plan hereby approved, this City Coun-
cil hereby (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out
the Redevelopment Plan, (b) requests the various officials,
departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administra-
tive responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate
to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers
in a manner consistent with redevelopment of the Project Area,
(c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon pro-
posals and measures designed to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan,
and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any pro-
ceeding, including the expenditure of moneys, necessary to be
carried out by the City under the provisions of the Redevelopment
Plan.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certi-
fied copy of this Ordinance to the Commission and the Agency,
whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carry-
ing out the Redevelopment Plan.
SECTION 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record with
the County Recorder of Orange County a description of the land
within the Project Area and a statment that proceedings for the
redevelopment of the Project Area have been instituted under the
Community Redevelopment Law.
342
ORDINANCE NO. NS- 2039
PAGE TEN
SECTION 11. The Building and Safety Department of the City of
Santa Ana is hereby directed for a period of two (2) years after
the effective date of this Ordinance to advise all applicants
for building permits within the Project Area that the site for
which a building permit is sought for the construction of build-
ings or for other improvements is within a redevelopment project
area.
SECTION 12. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a
copy of the description and statement recorded by the City Clerk
pursuant to Section 10 of this Ordinance, a copy of this Ordi-
nance, and a map or plat indicating the boundaries of the Project
Area, to the Controller and Assessor of the County of Orange, to
the governing body of each of the taxing agencies which receives
taxes from property in the Project Area, and to the State Board
of Equalization, within thirty days following the adoption of
the Redevelopment Plan.
SECTION 13. If any part of this ordinance or the Redevelop-
ment Plan which it approves is held to be invalid for any
reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Redevelopment
Plan, and this Council hereby declares that it would have
passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder
of the Redevelopment Plan if such invalid portion thereof had
been deleted.
ADOPTED this 4th day of December , 1989.
ATTEST:
nTce C. - /
erk of the Council
DaNiel H. Y~g
Mayor /
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Young
Acosta
Griset
May
McGuigan
Norton
Pulido
Aye
-A-ye
Aye
Aye
Aye
A_ve
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
3,-13
In compliance with Section 21081.6, Adoption of report or
monitoring program for changes to project approval, of the
California Public Resources Code, the Community Redevelopment
Asency has prepared the attached monitorin8 pro8rammatrix'
The matrix will be employed for every development project
within the Bristol Project Area that requires site plan
review. The Design Review Co~ntttee will serve as the forum
for review of the required mitigation measures and
determination of which measures apply to a 8iven project. The
case planner will utilize the matrix to indicate what steps
have been taken toward implementing the mitigation measure
requirements applicable to each project, and shall indicate the
date such action was completed. Revisions may be made to
reflect reorganization of City agencies over the life of the
plan.
Exhibit A
34-4
bristol
est disk
101501~/
Project Naiez
Addreso/Locationi
Descrlptlonl
Honitoring Prograo
TYPE OF IHPACTI HDNITORING AGENCY IHPLEHENTATION CERTIFYINg STAFF HEMER
EIR PAgE i/ PtDIP#A/CDA * DATE
N]TIgATIDN flEADURE
Soils
page 34
Developers to conduct soil and geologic
studies required far developiont on an
individual basis.
P&8
2 Soils
page 34
Developers to begin grading an soon after
April 15 as possible.
Soils
page $4
Developers to place sire. or other suitable
intorial on uncovered soils as needed during
conetruction.
P&B
4 Soils
Developers to install teiparary culverts,
basinst etc. es needed during construction.
PDA
5 Soils
page 34
Developers to construct all projects in
coopliance #Jth applicable City and State
regulations.
P&D
P&B = Planning & Building Agency
PWA = Public Works Agency
CDA = Community Development Agency
I
TYPE OF INPACTI HONITORING AGENCY INPLEltENTATION CERTIFYING STN:F HERDER
EIR PADE g/ PBBIP~A/CB4 DATE
NITISATION REASURE
~l~age 4&
~velopers to cooplete partially ieprovad
:reel to extent redevelopment funds permit.
r Duality
~age 46
Developers to tipllienL TSH ananuran tn
rLHtUCe trips generated.
Air Duality
page 46
Developers to eoploy entering techniques
to mitigate conntructLon-generated dust.
P&B
9 Air Duality
page 47
Developers ta maintain and service
cnnstruction equipment to minimize exhaust
elineiofle.
10 Air Quality
page 47
Developers to adhere to South Coast 4OHO
Rule 403 to insure cleon-up of construction-
related dirt on approach routes to site.
PWA
4ir Duality
page 47
The City shall consider use of energy-
efficient lighting along Bristol to reduce
emissions of poeer plants servicing the area.
12 Air Duality
page 47
The City mill synchronize traffic sigflaln
along Bristol.
PWA
13 Air hality
page 47
~-%velopers to halt cnnstruction activities
~ ring local Stage TNO smog alerts.
l, manage
:ge 52
Developers in the project area to provide
adequate site drainage at time of
construction.
346
TYFE DF IflPACTI IIOHITDRIN6 AGENCY INPLEHENTATIDR CERTIFYING STAFF MENDER
EIR PAGE !/ P&D/PYA/CDA DATE
NITI6ATION flEARURE
Drainage
page 52
Tho Redovelopoent Agency or DC Hood
Control District lay construct store drain
ioprOVelents.
i6 Drainage
Developers to install telporary culverts,
catch basins, etc. to taintain drainage
flo~s and collect excess Mater and sedilent.
17 Flooding
page 52
The City ahall udopt the lUSt recent
18 Flooding
page 52
Tho Federal Flood Insurance Agency lay
requirl additional litigation ieasureu.
19 Plant Life
page 53
Developers to ropIane trees and voget~tion
requiring reioval uith Agency-approved
species iF feasible.
20 Plant Life
pageRS
Developers to provide ]andKaping plan for
individual projects as a condition of
Agency opprovaI.
21 Plant Life
page 53
Developers to provide landscaping using
living plant iaterial.
22 Anital Life
page 54
Developers to notify the Dopartient of
Fish h 6use regarding any diversion or
obstruction of channel, stroai, etc.
23 Noise
page 65
Developers to legit construction to hours
specified in Dante Aflu Noise Control
Ordinance.
CDA
CDA
PkU
PLO
P~B
TYPE O~ )~PACTI
EiR PASE I/
NIT]b~TIDN MEASURE
flONITOR[N6 AGENCY
PEn/PYA/CnA
XHPLEHENTATIDN
347
CERTIFYINg STAFF HE~eER
bATE
24 Noise P&8
'evelopers to screen construction activities
roi idjacsnt lind uses using fencing nhere
!easible.
~doisn P~9
page 65
Developers to equip all construction
equipaent operated within lO00 feet afa
duelling unit with tufflur exhaust systen.
26 Noise
page 65
Developers to place stationary equipsunt
to direct noise flitted auuy frei sensitive
areas if feasible,
Pt8
27 Nolle
page 65
Developers to locate staging areas as far as
feasible from occupied dnellings.
PLB
26Noise page 65
Agency to replace any residential barrier
rouovndin conJuflctto~ stth Agency action
Nith six foot bnrriera~ to be Agency funded.
CDA
29 Noise ,. PbB
paqn 6&
Developers to construct harriers betnnefl
nolle source and sensitivs areal uhure
30 Noise PL9
page &6
Developers to provide sound insulation for
existing residential structures per State
Sound Insulation Standards ~lere structures
~roviding sound barriers have been resovnd
Id replacenent is infeasible.
2i SS
.age 66
Hoeeovflers Ind developurn to consider
installing sound insulation to deal
Nith noise inpacts.
348
TYPE OF IRPACTI ~ HONITGRING AGENCY INPLENENTATIGN CERTIFYING STAFF
EiR PAGE I/ PbSIP#AICDA GATE
~ITIGATION MEASURE
32 Noise
page &&
Schools to consider noise levels in
design of nee buildings,
33 Noise
page &&
Developers to provide sound insulation in
all nee multi-family residential
construcitou per State lam.
Pf~S
34 Light & Glare
page &7
City to utilize cut-off lueineires in nee
street lighting to minimize spii]over
onto residences.
PeA
35 Light & 6lere
page 67 ;
Developers not to use reflective glass
that causes excessive glare for eoturists or
residents.'
36 Land Use
page 79
The Agency lay adopt design guides for
the project area or portions thereof.
37 Natural Resources
page 79
N/A
38 Risk of Upset
page Bi
U.S.G.O.T, will regulate hazardous
materials transported by ~ruck or real.
39 Risk of Upset
pare 8i
All businesses using hazardous materials
must film data information sheets .ith
the City Fire Department.
40 Risk of Upset
page 81
The O.C. Hazardous Haste Kanageient Plan
shah identify designated truck routes
for hazardous materials.
PWA
4i Rousing
page 69
The Agency to insure Developeout of
affordable housing per State lam.
CDR
TYPE OF IHPACT/ HONXTORZ#6 AGENCY
EIN PAGE B/ ~ P~GIPNAICDA
HITIGATION HEASURE
INPLEHENTATiON
349
CERTIFY]N6 6TAKF NEIgER
BATE
g~Houeing
,age 90
~qency to pay for relocatton~ differential
~nd fair market value acquisition costs.
4. dousing page 90
Agency to replace all lea/nod ieanea housing
on a ean-for-eae basis.
CDA
CDA
II Houeing ' CDA
page 90
Agency to reserve iSZ of housing replaced
for affordable housing, Reserve gOZ of the
affordable housing for very low iflcoou
persons.
45 Transportation' PNA
page
Widen Bristol including Santiago Creek
Bridge free memory Lane to Namer Avenue
from four to sis lanes,
4& Transportation
page
City, to provide a 100 feat roadouy on a
120'kfoot right-of-Nay on Bristol.
47 Transportation
page IL7
Provide inhersoction lane configurations
per Table 21 of the Nilldan ElS.
4B Transportation
paul 117 '
Prohibit U-turns and provide right&turn
overlaps with left-torn phasing at Bristol/
Nsoory Lane and BristoIIlTth,
J/~'raneporhatiea
age
rovidn protnctnd left-turn phaeing in ali
irnctieas of follouing intnrsnctious
ristol: Hsoory, 17th~ ]st, Ediflger~ Warner.
Provide protected left-horn phasing in
north/south direction of Gristol/KcFaddefl
and 9risto]/Gishop/Nillits intersections.
PNA
Pga
P#A
P#A
TYPE DF IHPACT!
EIR PASE
fllTISATION HEAgURE~
flONITORIN6 AGENCY
P&BIP#AICDA
tKPLEHEKTA~ION
CERTtFYIN6 STAFF fie#BEll
BATE
50 Transportation
page il7
Provide protected left-turn phasing on
grists] in north-south direction of
intersections Nigh Santa Clara, #ashingtun,
Civic Center, Sth, and Santa Ana Blvd.
Transporation
page 1i7
Miden S~ntiago~Creek bridge to lO0-foot
ro&dnay uith three lanes each direction.
52 Transportaiton
page H7
Re~ovn croseualk at Bristol/St. Andreus and
direct pldeetrians to 61enuood Piece.
Transportation
page
Provide dual left-turn lanes on all
approaches to Bristollist interaection~
in northl~outh direction at Bristol/
#~rner.
S4Transportation ; page Ii7
Cul-de-sac liner streets as listed uith
raised center indians.
55 Transportation
page 118
Provide e farstdo bun turnout on u/s Bristol
s/o Santa Ana Glvd.
5~Transportation page 118
Provide farside bus turnout on Grists!
north and southbound at NcFadden, Edinger,
Namer, First (north only).
57 Traneportation
page 118
Prohibit parking along Bristol froe fleeory
to #arner,
56 Transportation
page
Provide signal ~ordination systel along
Bristol corridor.
PW~
PWA
PWA
PWA
PWA
P#A
PWA
PYA
TYPE OF IHPACT/ ' flDNITORING AGENCY IIIPLEIqENTATION CERTIFY]NS STAFF
SIR PASS I/ P&B/PIIA/CBA BATE
IIIT]GATZON flEASURE.,
~lrunspartation ':r PWA
page ilo ..
Jidan #antminstur tosix lanes bstwann
Fairviel and Euclid. '
~ Transportation
page 1i8 ·
At Brietol/¥mshingtou, miter signal phasing
and provide southboundright turn lane.
' &I Transportation '
page 118
Bt Brimful and Civic C~nt~r, altur signal
. phasing, add northbound right-turn lane,
provide dual southbound lift-turn lanes.
PWA
&2 Transportation "
. page ii8
At Bristol and Fifth, add east- and
nestbound left-turn lanes.
PWA
Transportation ..
page iig ~.
At Bristol and First, allow east- and
uantbound travel frei exclusive right-turn
lings,
44 Transportation,
page 119
At Bristol and I1cFadden, construct a north-
b~nd right-turn Iisi, imd provide dual
southbound lift-turn lanes.
PWA
~lranopurtatiun
'page iii
At Bristol and Edinger, provide dual left-
turn lanes.
FWA
&&Transportation
~agi
t Bristol and #uther, provide dual
nd .out-booud left-turn lanes and add
: eparatl northbound right-turn lane,
&7 Trmnsportatiou
page I19
At 6uvIsteenth and Fairviuu, provide dual
left turn lanes~ add separate north-, south-
and lastbonnd right turn lanes, and
construct three through lanes.
TYPE OF JHPACT/ i FLONITORIHG ASEHCY IFLPLEHEHTATION CEATIFYI#6 STAFF
EIR FA6E II P&BIP#AICDA DATE
HITIGATIOH HEASURE'
&8 Trnspurtatien ·
page 119 :
At Seventeenth and College, provide dual
northbound left-turn lanes and alter signal
phasing.
FHA
69 Transportation
page
At Seventeenth
northbound right-turn lane,
P#A
70 Transportation
page IL?
At Seventeenth and Floeeq add a second
northbound right-turn lane, construct a
separate meatbound right-turn ]ann, and
provide dual eestbonnd left-torn Lanes.
PgA
71Troneportotion page
At First and Riitt Street, construct
northbound right-turn lane. The Agency
should develop on ieplonentation plan For
the bikemay and bicycle-related inanities.
PWA
72 Schools
page 122
SAUSD mill levy school iepact Fees,
dedications, etc. an needed fur Facilities
construction to reduce develeplont alpines.
P&S
73 Schools CnA
page 122
The Agency may eeo tax iflcreient Funds
for IoN/sod housing.
74 Fire Protection ... P&9
page 124 *'
' The City eill annually evaluate Fire Oept.
needs.
75Fire Protection , P&9
page 124
Developers to provide adequate Fire
FloN per Fire Dept. regulations.
76 LaN £nforceeent P&S
page 125
City any require developer to provide
on-site security personnel.
353
TYPE OF IflPACT/ : flOHITDRIN6 AGENCY I{IPLEKENTATIDN CERTIFYIN6 BTAJ:F
EIH PAS£ bi P&SIP#A/CDA DATE
fllTI6ATION ItEASURE'
77 LaN Enforcement. ' P&O
~page 125
The City gill annually evaluate PD needs.
Ln. Enforceonflt
page 125
The City shill investigate establishing
t~act fane for nee developunflt.
79£nergy
pigs 126 ''
Developers to construct all projects per
Ciliforntn Energy Conission Standards.
80Utilities: Niter pigs
City to instill eater ia/ns per Table 2,
Public liprovunente~ is Redevelopunnt fends
perlit.
81 Utilities: Hater
page 12~
· City to onfercl'state ]aus re ~iter-efficient
· plumbing fixtures,
92Utilities: Niter
page
City to En~°rce Title 20 und Title 24 of
California Adlinixtrativn Code.
PLB
P#A
83 Utilitinst Sanitation
page 132
City to replace sanitary iunnr lyutun per
Table 2q Public lnprovesents is Rodevelopunnt
funds petalS.
PDA
64 Utilitiest Sanitation
· page 132
Developers to il~leieflt Source control and
_other litigation leisures.
salaries: hturi{ Gin
ige
evelopern to comply etth State building
dtunderde per Title 24 requiretents.
PMA
354
.TYPE OF IHPACT/ HDNITORI~ ~[NCY IHPLEHENTATION C£RTIFYIN6 STAFF HElSlel
EIR PA6E Il P~SIPMA/C~A DATE
NITI6ATION #EASURE
86 Utilities: Natural Bas
page 1{5
Business ind holeouners'to consider
retrofitting nixsting structures, using solar
installations and energy efifcimnt mquiponnt.
87 Utilities: Natural San
page 155
City to conduct individual building design
revile.
Utilities4 Natural SOu'
page
Southern California Sas to oxpand existing
systei.
P&9
B9 Utilities: Electrical Porter PbS
page l~&
Doveupers to couply math California building
standards per Title 24.
90 Utilities: Solid iastn PMA
pagl 14i
O.C, NazardouS Haste Hgt. Plan to
identify accuptable transport routes.
91 Utilities: Solid Naste ' " P&B
page
Sovl]opere kaoline or roouvo soils
containing hazardous lateria]s per Federal
State rngu]ationu and S,C. HazardDus Nasto
Nouageonnt Plan.
92 Utilities~ Stori Drainage PNA
page 143
City to construct iiprovoonntn per Table 2 to
extont Redeveluponnt funds allou.
P~9
93 Utilities: Sterl Drainage
page 143
Develuperu to provide hook-ups to City drains
per Santa Ann regulations.
94 NuoaA Health
page 145
City shall enforce OC Vector Control
guidelines. Notification required two
unnks prior to deonlition or grading.
TYPE DF INP~CTI
EIR PAGE gl
fl]TI6ATION REASUEE
flONITORiN6 AGENCY
P&9/PYA/CDA
IflPLEflENTATION
355
CERTIFYING 6T~F REneER
~TE
~Huean Health ~age 145
~evn]opors to provide proper trash storage
disposal, Grading shall alien proper
unoff,
Huean Health
page 145
Deve]opurs to uso landscape iatorial par
Vector Control District guidelines,
g7 Aesthetics page 147
OevelopL~s to cooply nigh Agency design
standards.
~8 Recreation
page 148
Agency to develop linear parks as funds
parlit,
Recreation
page 148
City to adept park]and ieprovooants fees,
100 RKreation
page 148 :'
Agency to encourage SAUSD to upgrade
existing end install nee recreation
faci]itie~ at schools,
Historic Resources
pago 149
City to prnaecvw the #alker Residence if
feasible,
102 Archaeological Resources
page 150
gualified archaeologist to ennitur grading
. ~':tivitfes, Construction to cease if
F artifacts founds.
lO 'chanological Resources
i~age 149
guali~ied archaeologist to evaluate site if
archaeological resources unearthed.
PWA
P&B
CDA
P&8
WHEN RECORDED, N~II. TO:
FREE ~CORD~/ PEE SECTION 6~0~, GOVEEI~ENT CODE
CITY OF SANTt ANA / t. ,
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECQRD8
OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
City Clerk ~ EXEMPT
City of Santa Ana [ C19
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa AnD, California 92702
AM DEC15'89
DESCRIPTION OF LAND #ITHIN 't'n~ BRISTOL COHIDOR
EEI~VELOPHENT PROJECT
and
STAT~iENT THAT REDEVELOPNENT PROCEEDINGS
HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED
(Pursuant to Health and Safety Code, Section 33373)
Proceedings for the redevelopment of the Bristol Corridor
Redevelopment Project have been instituted under the California Community
Redevelopment Law pursuant to a Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted
December 4, 1989 by Ordinance No. NS-2039 of the City Council of the City
of Santa Ana, California.
The description of the land within the Bristol Corridor
Redevelopment Project Area is attached hereto and consists of 26 pages.
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Date: /L~'~._/~z~t Z/. / P~
State of California
SS.
County of Orange
~n~ice C. Guy /'~/
City Clerk
On this //__/~day of ~, in the year
/~09' before me , Clerk of the
Council, or M/. Z). ~'~0/-/ , Deputy Clerk
of the Council of the City b~f Santa Aha personally
appeared ,_7~AM/~.~ ~. ~M~' , personally known
to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be the person who executed this
of the City of Santa Aha andffacknowledged to me tha4J,
the City of Santa mna executed it.
L~C4%L DES~IPTIO~
~ristol Corridor ~develop~ent Project
~tnnin~ at the point.of intars~ction'of the centerline of ~ristol "
Street ar~ a li~e parallel with amd distant 52.0 feet Northerly frc~ the
bcu~wry of the existin~ C~,~v~nity Redevelopment ~en~y the city of
Santa Aha Project Area, as es*ahlished by O~ N.S. 1173~ thence,
1. ~t, along said .~vallel line an~ said existing RedevelopS-hr Area
bc~u~, 953.7 feet to a line parallel with and c%istant 295.7 feet
Westerly frown the West line of Shelton Street; thence,
2. North, along last said parallel line, 268.0 feet to the cent~rline of
Fifth Street; thence,
3. West, along last said centerline, 23.0 feet to a line parallel with
and ~{-~tant 295.7 feet Westerly from the West line of Shelton Street
as it exists North of said Fifth Street; thence,
4. North, along last said parallel line, 155.0 feet to a line parallel
with and d/stant 155.0 feet Southerly f~% the centerline of Sixth
Street; thence,
5. ~a~t, along last said parallel line, 13.5 feet to a line parallel
with and distant 282.2 feet Westerly f~% last said West line of
Shelton Street; thence,
6. North, along last said parallel line, 125.0 f~t to the South line of
sixth Street; thence,
7. West, along said south line and departing f~,, said existing
Rsdevelo~m~-nt Area boundary, 242.8 feet to the West line of Baker
Street; thence,
8. North, along last said West line, 734.93 feet to the North line of I civic Center Drive; thence,
9. West, along said North line, 295.0 feet to the Fa~t line of Louise
Street; thence,
10. North, along said East line, 1482.5 feet to the South 1Lne of
Washingtmn Avenue; thence,
11. West, along last said South line, 60.0 feet to the West line 'of
12. North, along last said West line, 1347.9 feet to a l~ne parallel with
and distant 235.74 feet Southerly frc~ the centerl~ne of Seventeenth
Street; thence,
13. Fa~t, along last said parallel line, 204.62 feet to a line parallel
with and distant 174.62 feet Easterly frc~ the centerl~x~e of sa~d
L~uis~ Street; thence,
356./
a56 4.
16.
North, along last said parallel line, 15.0 feet to a line parallel
with and ~{-~tant 220.74 feet Southerly f~.~.,~ said centerline of
Fa-~t, alor~ last said parallel line, 204.66 feet to the West line of
Tract No. 1196 as shown on m ~ap recorded in Book 37, page 4 of .........
Misoellanecus Maps of Orange County; thence,
North, alor~ last said West line, 60.74 feet to the South line of
Lot 11 of said Tract No. 1196; thence,
17. ~=t, ~lOO~ said South line and its ~a~cerly prolonc/atlon, 254.0 feet
to the ~t line of ~sewood Avenue; thence,
18. North, along last said ~-~t line, 30.75 feet to a line parallel with
and ~{~tance 129.25 feet Southerly f~, said ce~-~li~e of
Sevent~nth Street; thence,
19. Fast, alor~ last said parallel line, 90.0 feet to a line parallel
with said East line of Rosewood Avenue; thence,
20. South, along last said parallel line, 86.0 feet to the South line of
Lot 34 of said Tract No. 1196; thence,
21. F~t, along last said South line, 13.46 feet to the F~t line of said
Tract No. 1196; thence,
22.
23.
South, along last said East llne, 155.62 feet to the Northwest corner
of LDt 6, Tract No. 1448 as shown on a map r~rded in Book 46,
page 1 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
?~t, along the North line of said Lot 6 and bour~y of said Tract
1448, 126.0 feet; thence,
24. North, continuing along last said bc~F~y, 25.62 feet; thence,
25. F~t, along last said bour~ary, 73.0 feet; thence,
26. North, along last said bcu~4~y, 150.0 feet; thenoe,
27. ~t, along last said bour~y, 168.43 feet to the ~-~t l~ne of said
~k-act No. 1448; thence,
28.
North, along the Northerly prolongation of last said ~-~t line, 15.0
feet to a line parallel with and distant 180.0 feet Southerly fk.'-,,
said centerline of Sevent~=nth Street; thence,
29.
~t, along last said parallel 1/ne 427.8 feet to the ~t line of
Tract No. 1228 as shown on a map ~reoo~rded in Book 35, page 42 of
Miscellaneous Maps of said Orm~e County; thence,
30.
North along last said ~t line, 129.32 feet to a line parallel with
and distant 52.0 feet Southerly f~.'-,, said centerline of Sevent~nth
Street; thence,
2
F~t, along last
with and distant
thence,
~a~t, along last said parallel line, 682.70 feet to a line parallel
with and a{-~cant 40.0 feet Westerly fk~t the cent~rline of Flower
~t; thence,
32. North, along last said parallel line, said parallel line being on the
said existing RedevelO~t Area ~ry, 52.O feet to the
centerline of Seventeenth Street; thence,
33. ~t, alomg last said oenterline, 80.0 feet to a line parallel with
and ~{~tant 40.0 feet F~terly f~,, said centerline of Flower Street;
34. South, among last said parallel l~u%e, 257.0 feet to a line parallel
with and distant 257.0 feet Southerly f~., said cent-rline of
35. East, along last said parallel line and departing f~."-,, said existing
l%mdevelo~ment Area bou~4a~y, 1146.0 feet to the ~t line of RDss
Street; thence,
36. South, along last said ~a-~t line, 114.2 feet to the North line of
SLxteenth Street, thence,
37. ~t, along last said North line and its ~a~terly prolongation, 425.2
feet to the East line of Eur~nt Street; thence,
38. North, along last said East line, 156.7 feet to a line parallel with
and distant 214.5 feet Southerly frc~ said centerline of Seventeenth
Street; thence,
39. said par-~llel line, 186.5 feet to a line parallel
167.0 feet Westerly fz~. the West line of Broadway;
40. North, along last said parallel line, 19.45 feet to a line parallel
with and distant 195.0 feet Southerly ~,, said centerl~ne of
Sevent~nth Street; thence,
41. m~t, along last said parallel line, 167.0 feet to said West line of
Broadway; thence,
42. North, along last said West line, said West line being on the said
existing Redevelopment Area bour~a~y, 361.0 feet to a line parallel
with and distant 166.0 feet Northerly £~ said existing centerline
of Sevent~nth Street; thence,
43. West, alor~ last said parallel line and degart/r~ ~-~. said exist~n~
l~devamc~a~ent Area botlr~y, 500.0 feet to the ~t l~ne of Jefferson
Place; thence,
44. North, along last said ~ct line, 10.0 feet to a line pal-allel with
and d/stant 176.0 feet Northerly fr~m said existing oene~rl~ne of
45. West, along lest said parallel line 187.96 feet to the ~a~t line of
Lot 9, Tract No. 256 as shc~n on a map _rec~__z~ed in B~ok 14, page 23
of Mlsoellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
3561
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
North, along last said wa~t line to & line parallel with and distant
281.0 feet Northerly f~.'-, said existir~ oenterline of Sevent~nth
West, along l~t said parallel line, 186.6 feet to the ~a~t line of
Tract No. 256 as shown on a map reoorded in Book 14, page 23 of
Miscellen~us Maps of said Orange County; thence,
South, alon~ last said East line to a line parallel with and distant
1.0 foot Southerly fr~ the North line of lot 8 of said Tract
No. 256; thence,
West, ~lon~ last said parallel line, 133.9 feet to the ~t line of
West, 50.0 feet to the North-a~t corner of .I~t 13 of said Tract
No. 256; thence,
West, along the North line of said Imt 13, 90.0 feet to the West line
of said Lot 13; thence,
South, along said West line, 10.0 feet to the North line of Parcel 4
as shown on a map filed in Book '2, page 8 of R~cord of Surveys of
said Orange County; thence,
We~t, along last said North line and its Westerly prolongation, 311.8
feet to the East line of ~k-act No. 748 as shown on a map recorded in
Book 30, page 9 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Or~r~e Oounty; thence,
South, along last said Fa~t line, 74.5 feet to the South line of
Lot i of said Tract No. 748; thence,
West, along last said South line and its Westerly prolongation,
1075.0 feet to the West line of Olive Street, said West line being on
the East line of Lot 11, Tract No. 1069 as show~ on a map recorded
in Book 34, page 33 of Miscellaneous Maps of said (~e County;
South, along last said ~t line, 12.0 feet to the South-~t corner
of said LDt 11; thence,
West, along last said parallel line, 100.3 feet to a line pal-~llel
with and ~tant 100.3 feet Westerly f~. said West line of ~k-act
No. 1069; there;e,
South, along last said parallel line, 20.0 feet to a line ~llel
with and clistant 150.0 feet Northerly ~ said c~nterline of
Sevene~nth Street; thence,
West, along last said parallel line, 986.84 feet to the West line of
Westwood Avenue, said West line being o~ the East line of LOt 1,
Tract No. 1134 as show~ on a map ~rgco~rded in Book 36, page 29 of
Miscallaneam Maps of said Orange County; thence,
South, along said ~a~t line of LOt 1, 25.0 feet to the South-a~t
corner of said Lot 1; thence,
4
61. West, alor~ the South line of said Lot 1, 147.93 feet to the West
line of said Tract No. 1134, thence,
62. North, along last said West l~ne, 40.0 feet to a line parallel with
and distant 195.0 feet Northerly f~, said cent~rline of Sevent~nth
Street; thence,
63. West, slong last said par~ll~--I llne, 210.0 feet to the West line of
Bakar Street: thence,
64. North, along last said West line, 98.4 feet to the Scuth-~t corner
of Tract No. 1572 as shown on a ~ap reooD4~ in Book 48, page 16 of
Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thenoe,
65. West, along the South li~e of said Tract No. 1572, 673.8 feet to the
~*~t line of Bristol Street; thence,
66. North, along last said F~_~t line, 741.5 feet to the
prolongation of the south line of Tract No. 1724 as show~ on
recorded in Book 51, page 25 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange
67. West, along last said prolongation an~ South line of Tract No. 1724,
2537.7 feet to the Northeast corner of Tract No. 1478 as shown on a
map reoorded in Book 44, page 5 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orar~e
County; thence,
68. South, along the East line of said Tract No. 1478, 912.5 feet to the
South-a~t cor~er of Lot 103 of said Tract No. 1478; the.~ce,
691 West, along the South line of said I~Dt 103, -108.63 feet to the East
line of Alona Street; thence,
70. West, 60.0 feet to the Southeast cozner of Lot 68 of said Tract
No. 1478; ther~De,
71. West, along a line parallel with and ~{~-~ant 160.5 feet Northerly
f~,, said centerline of Sevent~nth Street, 913.4 feet to the West
line of English Street; thence,
72. Sc~th, along last said West line, 10.7 feet to the Sc~th-~t corner
of Lot 4 of said Ti-act No. 1478; thence,
73. West, along the South line of said LOt 4, 120.0 feet to the West llne
of said Tract No. 1478; ~,
74. North and Northwesterly, along the West bour~y of sa~d Tract
No. 1478 the followir~ oourses North 0'31~45'' West, 199.18 feet;
75. North 27'42'30" East, 193.27 feet; thence,
76. North 68'29'04" East, 215.59 feet; thenoe,
77. North 39'00'00" East, 634.05 feet to the North line of said Tract
No. 1478; ther~De,
356.f
356.
78.
· ; 79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
· 86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
North 36'01'16" ~m~t, 122.2 feet to the Northwesterly line of said
Tzact No. 1724; thence,
North 36'01'16" ~*~t, 876.46 feet along Said. Northwesterly line to
the North line of said Tract No. 1724; ~,
North 27'56'45" East, 22.67 feet to the Northwesterly line of Tract
No. 2122 as shown on a map recorded in Boo__k 61, page 50 of
M/soellanecus Maps of said Ox~nge County: thenoe,
North 27'56'45" ~t, 673.0 feet along last'said Northwesterly line
to the Southwest oorner of Lot 59 of said Tract No. 2122; thence,
West, 112.72 feet along a line parallel with and a~cant 107.66 feet
Southerly as mo~m~red along the Northwesterly line of said I~t 59
fro*, the North line of said Lot 59; thence,
Northease-~ly, 102.6 feet to a point on the Wetly prolongation of
the Nor~-h line of said Lot 59, said point beir~ d{~tant 124.74 feet
Westerly f¥o,, the Northwest corner of said LOt 59; thence,
F~nt, along last said prolongation, 124.74 feet to last said
Northwest corner, and also being the Southwest corner of Tract
No. 1608 as shown on a ~ap recorded Lq Book 48, page 22 of
Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
North 32'08'32" East, 1071.06 feet along the Northwestsrly line of
said Tract No. 1608 to the South line of Lot A of said Tract No.
1608; thence,
South 86'47'22" m~-t, 257.48 feet along last said South line to the
Southwesterly line of said LOt A; thence,
North 55'12'00" West, 218.0 feet to the North line of said LOt A;
~t, along last said North line 306.0 feet to a point on the
Southerly prolongation of the Northwesterly line of ~Yact No. 6280 as
shown on a map r~_ nrded in Book 229, page 46 of Miscellaneous Maps of
said Orange County; thence,
North 15'06'00" ~t, 28.87 feet along last said prolongation to the
Soutb-~t corner of said ~-act No. 6280; thence,
Northeasterly, along the West bourn',T' of said Tract No. 6280 the
following courses North 15'06'00" East, 193.19 feet; thence,
North 24'41'00" ~t, 377.0 feet; thence,
North 52'53'00" ~a~t, 77.4 feet; thenoe,
North 18'23'00" ~t, 461.0 feet along the West line of Lot 60 of
said Tract No. 6280 and its Nortb~terly prolongation; thence,
94. North-a~terly, 191.6 feet to a point on the Westerly prolongation of
the North line of Tract No. 6114 as shown on a
Book 241, page 45 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County, last
said point bei~ ~tant 121.0 feet Westerly frc~ the Northwest
corner of I~t 12 of said Tract No. 6114; thence,
95. West, along last said prolongation, 3.5 feet to the Southwesterly
prolongation of the East i/ne .of the 630 foot ~trip of land
~ibed in Parcel 2 in the da to tha county of Orange recorded
May 25, 1932 in ~ook 557, page 264 offic
96. North 23'30'40u ~m~t, 160.0 feet to the City botu~y of the city of
Santa Aha and the South line of Garden Gzuve Boulevard; thence,
97. North 70'50'40" West, 617.7 feet along said City bou~4~y to the
be~inning of a tangent curve, concave Southerly and having a radius
of 1960.0 feet; thence,
98. Wese-~ly, along last said curve through a central angle of 10'38'35"
an arc distance of 364.08 feet to the ~a~t line of Tz-act No. 2887 as
shown on a map recorded in Book 117, page. 28 of Miscellaneous Maps
of said Orange County; thence,
99. So~/th, along last said ~ast line and departing fz~,, said city
bo~r~a~y, 882.98 feet; thence,
100. 'So~ 34'39'39" West, 535.59 feet along the South-a-~cerly line of
said TI-act No. 2887, thence,
101. Continuing along said Southeasterly line, North 00'25'51" West,
51.40 feet; thence,
102. South 36'32'44" West, 457.99 feet; thence,
103. North 00'25'51" West, 23.90 feet to the Sou~T~arly line of Tract
No. 2762 as shc~n on a map _reco~rded in Book 113, page 28 of
Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
104. ~outh 39'13'17" West, 562.52 feet alon~ last said South-~terly line
to the Soutb~terly line of Tract No. ~637 as shown on a map
reoorded in Book 129, page 20 of F~lar~ous Maps of said Or-unge
105. South 37'31'00" West, 493.18 feet aloft3 ~--~t said Southeasterly line
and its southwesterly prolongation; thence,
106. Sc~/th 25'32'08" West, 179.0 feet to a point o~ the Fa-~terly
prolongation of the North l~%e of Tract 3834 as shown on a ~ap
_reco~rded in Book 133, page 15 of M/soellaneous Maps of said Orange
Cc~ty, said point berg ~{~tant 53.5 feet Easterly f~. the
Nortb-a~t corner of said Tract No. 3834; thence,
107. West, along land said prolongation, 53.5 feet to last said Northeast
356.7
108 ·
109.
110.
111.
113 ·
114 ·
115.
116.
117.
118 ·
119 ·
120.
123.
124.
Southwesterly, Northerly, and Westerly along the bour~y of said
Tr~ctNo. 3834 the following cotlrses So~th 25'32'08" West, 515.05
feet; thence,
South 34%40'08'' West, 1132.58 feet; thence,'
North 00'44'51" West, 235.57 feet; thenoe,
South 89'36'12" West, 199.84 feet to a point on the Northerly
prolongation of the ~t line of Tract No. 9631 as shown on a map
~r~co~rded i~ Book 411, page 12 of Misoell~ Maps of said Orange
Oounty, said point being distant 135.85 feet Northerly f~,, the
North-~t corner of said Tract No. 9631; the_~oe,
South 06'48'24" West, 417.3 feet along last said prolongation and
F~=t line to the beginning of a tar~ent curve, concave Northwesterly
and having a radius of 882.5 feet; thence,
Southwesterly, along said curve thro~3h a oentral angle of 25'31'10"
an ar~ distanoe of 393.06 feet to a non-tangent line; thence,
South 34'52'13" West, 56.53 feet along lest said line to the
North-a~t corner of Tract No. 8803 as shown on a map recorded in
Book 461, page 42 of Miscellaneous Maps of said 0ran~3e County;
S~uthwesterly, Westerly and Northerly along the bour~a~y of said
Tract No. 8803 the following course~ South 34'52'13" West, 284.15
feet; thence,
So~th 29'22'02" West, 150.41 feet; thence,
South 29'36'02" West, 266.23 feet; thence,
South 86'39'58" West, 324.13 feet; thence,
North 00'32'47" West, 147.0 feet; thence,
South 89'19'49" West, 150.0 feet to the ~"~t line of Fairview
Street; thence,
North, along last said East line 129.81 feet to a line parallel with
and ~{~tant 331.8 feet Northerly f&~,, said centerli~e of Sevene~nth
Street; thence,
West, along last said paxallel l~ne, 779.1 feet to the ~t 1/ne of
Tract No. 1351 as shown on a map r~oo~rded in Book 41, page 27 of
Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
South, along last said ~t line 152.8 feet to the Scutb-2~t corner
of Lot 20 of said Tract No. 1351; thence,
West, along the South line of said Lot 20, 106.29 feet to the
S~uthwest corner of said Lot 20; thence,
125. North~ along the West line of said Imt 20, 69.0 feet, to the
Northwest corner of said Imt 20; thence,
126. West, 50.0 feet to the North~t corner of Lot 21 of said Tract No.
1351; thenoe,
127. West, along the North line of said Lot 21, 106.28 feet to the East
li~e of Tract No. 1736 as show~ on & ~ap r~oorc%ed ~ Book 50, page 9
of Miscellaneous Map~ of said Orar~e O0unty; thence,
128. South, along last said ~a-~t line, 44.17 feet to the S(a~b-~t corl~er
of Lot 15; thence,
129. West, along th~ South line of said Lot 15, 108.2 feet; thence,
130. Continuirg along last said South line, South, 6.0 feet; thence,
131. West, 83.44 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 15 a~d the
beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave ~terly and having a
radius of 175.0 feet; thence,
132. Southerly, along last said curve ~ a oentral angle of
17'33'42" a~ arc distance of 53.64 feet; thence,
133. West, 50.0 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 1 of said Tract
No. 1736; thence,
134. West, 83.52 along the South line of said Lot i to the West line of
said Tract No. 1736 and city bo~y of the City of Santa A~a;
135. South,' 803.8 feet along said city bou~y ar~ West l~ne of Tract
No. 11429 as ~how~ on a ~ap re~orded i~ Book 513, page I of
F~iscellaneous Maps of said Orange County to the South line of said
Tract No. 11429; thence,
136. ~t, along last said South line and departing f~, said City
~wy, 264.0 feet to the ~t li~e of said ~ract No. 11429;
137. North, along last said East line to a line parallel with and distant
210.0 feet Southerly from said centerline of Sevent~nth Street;
138. Fa~t, along last said parallel line, 539.8 feet to the West line of
Lot 4, Tract No. 9536 as show~ c~ & ~ap record_~ ~ Book 400,
page 14 of F~laneous Maps of said Ora~e County; thence,
139. North, along last said West line, 17.0 feet to the North line of
said Lot 4; thence,
140. ~t, along last said North line, 100.0 feet to the East lh%e of
said ~xact No. 9536; the~oe,
141. South, along last said F~t line, 243.0 feet to the North line of
Tract No. 8947 as show~ on a ~ap reooz~e~ i~ Book 383, page ~0 of
Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange Oounty; thence,
356, q
9
356
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151 ·
152.
153 ·
156.
157.
F~-t, along last said North line and its ~terly prolongation,
472.0 feet to a line ~allel with and R{Wcant 52.0 N~terly fr~m
the oenterline of Fairview Street; thence,
South, ~lon~ last said parallel line, 184.4 feet to the
Southwesterly prolongation of the west lir~ of Santa Aha .River;
Nortb-*-tarly, along last said prolc)ng~'ci~n ~ ~ line the
following courses North 35'24'00" ~t, 228.14 feet; thenoe,
North 89'15'17" East, 35.11 feet; thence,
North 32'02'24" ~t, 329.46 feet; thence,
North 27'31'33" E~t, 136.14 feet to a ll~e parallel with and
~tant 40.0 feet Southerly frc~ said oer~rline of Seventeenth
Street: thence,
E~st, along last said parallel line, 503.1 feet to the ~t line of
said Santa Aha River (~annel and Northeasterly prolongation of the
Northwestarly line of Tract No. 10038 as shown on a map recorded in
Book 456, page 2 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
South 34'47'52" West, 237.2 feet to the North line of said Tract
No. 10038; thence,
~t, along last said North line, 561.9 feet to the West line of
King Street; thence,
South 27'42'30" West, 52.32 feet along last said West line to the . ..
Westerly prolongation of the South line of Lot 12 as shown on a map
r~co~zded in Book 3, page 42 of Record of Surveys of said Orange
~t, along last said prolongation, said South line and its Easterly
prolongation, 546.0 feet to the East line of E~z31ish Street; thence,
North, along last said Fagt line, 104.0 feet to a line parallel with
and distant 175.0 feet Southerly f~-~ the oenterline of Seventeenth
Street; thence,
~t, along last said parallel line, 89.53 feet to a line parallel
with and distant 119.53 feet Eas~rly f~u. the oenterline of English
Street; thence,
South, along last said parallel line, 237.93 feet to a line parallel
with and distant 220.0 feet Northerly f~,, the centerline of
Fire,nth Street; thence,
~t, along last said parallel line, 74.47 feet to a line parallel
with and d~-~tant 194.0 feet F~terly fi~. said centerline of ~n~li~h
Street; thence,
South, along last said parallel line, 190.0 feet to the North line
of said Fifteenth Street; thence,
10
158.
East, along last said North line, 15.0 feet to a line parallel with
and distant 209.0 feet _~a~terly fr~m said centsrline of English
Street; thence,
159. North, along last said parallel line, 190.0 feet to said parallel
line ~tant' 220.0' feet frc~ the centerline of Fifteenth Street;
thence,
160. ~, alor~ last ~aid parallel li~e, 67.32 feet to the West line of
Lot I as shown on a map filed in Book 81, page 14 ~cord of Surveys
of said Orange Oounty; thence,
161. North, along last said West line, 100.0 feet to the Wese-~ly
prolongation of the centerline of Sixteenth $~et; thence,
162. F~t, along last said prolongation, 39.32 feet to the beginni~ of a
non-tangent curve, concave soutb-~terly a~ having a radius of 45.0
feet; thence,
163. Northeasterly and ~a~terly, along last said curve throug~ a central
angle of 123'17'47" an arc distance of 96.83 feet to a point of
reverse curvature with a tangent curve, concave to the Northeast and
havi~g a radius of 46.23 feet; thence,
164. Southeasterly, along last said curve ~ a central angle of
33'19'31" a~ ax= distance of 26.89 feet to a point of tangency with
the North line of said sixteenth Street; thence,
165. ~*~t, along last said North line as shown on a map recorded in Book
27, page 36 ~rd of S%u~;eys of said Orange Oo~ty, 682.0 feet to
the West line of Lot E as shown on said map; thence,
166. North, along last said West line, 126.29 feet to the North line of
said Lot E; thence,
167. ~t, along last said North line and its Easterly prolongation,
202.8 feet to a llne parallel with and distant 232.8 feet Westerly
from the oentPrline of ~ollege Avenue; thence,
168. North, along last said parallel line, 115.0 feet to a line paz~11el
with and ~{~tant 50.0 feet Southerly f~,~ said centerli~e of
Sevene~nth Street; thence,
169. ~t, along last said parallel llne, 2188.5 feet to a line parallel
with and ~tant 60.0 feet Westerly frc~ the centerlire of said
Bristol Street; thenoe,
170. South, along last said parallel line, 1462.4 feet to the North line
Of Wash~n Avenue; thence,
171. West, along last said North line, 196.7 feet to the Northerly
prolongation of the West line of Lot ~, Tract 680 as shown on a map
recorded in Book 21, page 5 of ~k[scellanecus Maps of said Orange
172. South, along last said prolongation ar~ West line, 190.0 feet to the
North l~ne of Lot 11, Tract No. 1256 as shown on a map r~nrded in
~ook 41, page 48 of Miscellaneous Mape of said Orange County; thence,
356.1!
ll
174.
175.
176.
177 ·
178.
179 ·
~t, alon~j last said North li~e, 7.0 feet to the We~t line of Lot
12 of said Tract No. 1256; thence,
South, along last said West line and its Southerly prolongation,
154.59 feet to the North line of Lot 20 of said Tract No. 1256;
West, along last said North line, 30.15 feet to the West line of
said Imt 20; thence,
South, a/ong last said West line, 111.98 feet to the Northwest
oorner of Lot 13, Tract No. 1290 as shown c~ a map recorded in
]~ook 39, page 39 of M/soellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
South, along the West line of said Tnt 13 and its Southerly
prolongation, 171.99 feet to the North l~ne of LOt 23 of said Tract
No. 1290; thenoe,
~*~t, along last said North line, 22.91 feet to the West line of
LOt 22; thence,
South, along last said West line, 131.73 feet to the North line of
LOt 4, Tract No. 1262 as shown on a map recorded in Book 39, page 6
of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
180. West, along last said North line, 27.56 feet to the West line of
said Lot 4; thence,
181. South, along last said West llne and its Southerly prolongatlon,
152.21 feet to the North line of Lot 22 of said Tract No. 1262;
182.
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
West, along last said North line 20.99 feet to the West line of last
said Lot 22; thence,
South, along last said West line, 111.98 feet to the North line of
Lot 9 in Block A, T~-act No. 671 as shown on a map recorded in
~ook 24, page 32 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange (~ounty; thence,
Wast, along last said North line, 12.63 feet to the West line of
said LOt 9; thence,
South, along last said West line, 162.0 feet to the South line of
Ninth Street; thence,
West, along last said South line, 14.93 feet to a line parallel with
and distant 364.9 feet Westerly f,~ said centerline of Bristol
Street; thenoe,
South, along last said parallel line, 177.8 feet to a line parallel
with last said South line; thence,
~a~t, along last said parallel line, 8.0 feet to a 1/ne parallel
with ar~ distant 356.9 feet Westerly fk~., said oenterline of Bristol
Street; thence,
12
192.
193.
194.
195.
196.
· 197.
198.
189. South, along last said parallel line and its Southerly prolongation,
243.1 feet to the South line of civic Oent~ Drive; thence,
190. F~t, along last said South li~e, 48.7 feet to the West 1]~e of
Lot 29, Tract No. 662 as show~ on a map ~reco~rded in Book 24, page 17
of Misoellanecus Maps of said' Orange Om~nty~ thence,
191. South, along last said West line and West lines of ~ 6 and 19 of
said Tract No. 662, 453.5 feet to the North lt~e of Lot 6, Tz~ct
No. 1152 as sho~n on a map recorded in Book 38, page 9 of
Mi__~cellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
West, along last said North line, 9.23 feet t~ the West 1Lne of last
said LOt 6; thence,
South, along last said West line, 153.81 feet to the Southwest
corner of last said Lot 6; thence,
South, 60.0 feet to the Northeast corner of LOt 17 of said T~act
No. 1152; thence,
Sctfch, along the ~m~t line of said Lot 17, 130.0 feet to the South
line of said Lot 17; thence,
West, along last said South line and its Westerly prolongation,
250.0 feet to the West line of said Tract No. 1152; thence,
South, along the Southerly prolongation of last said West line; 2.0
feet; thence,
West, along to a li~e parallel with and distant 162.0 feet Southerly
f~.'-Li the cen~-~line of said sixth Street, 30.0 feet to the Easterly
l~ne of Horace J. Pullen's Fifth Street Tract as shown on a map
~r~co~rded in Book 4, page 81 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange
199. North, along last said West llne, 12.0 feet to the South line of
Lot I in Block C of said Horace J. Pullen's Fif~ch Street Tract;
thence,
200. West, alomg last said South line and its Westerly prolongation,
400.0 feet to the West line of said Block C; thence,
201. South, along last said West line ar~ ~a-~t line of Pacific Avenue,
645.0 feet to the Westerly prolongatio~ of the South line of Lot 8
in Block 2 of Pacific Electric Subdivision as shown on a map
r~oorded in Book 4, page 14 of Misoell~ Maps of said Orar~e
202. ~a~t, along last said prolongation, l~st said South line and its
~_rly prolongation, 728.0 feet to the West line of Lot 14 in
Block B of Gold_~miths ;~ldition as shown on a map recorded in
Book 31, page 23 of Miscellaneous R~cords of /os Angeles County,
California; thence,
~3
204 ·
205 ·
· 206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212.
213.
214.
215.
South, along last said West line and its Southerly prolongation,
433.0 feet to the South 1hne of Block C of said Gold,tbs ~[tion:
West, along last sa/d South 1/ne ar~ North li~e of S~c~ ~d Street,
2966.0 feet to the West line of Block A of the Fisher Trac~ as shown
on a ~ap ~re~o~rded in Book 4, page 90 of ~tL~!laneous Map~ of said
orange Oamty; thence,
North, alon~ last said West line an~ East line of Townsend Street,
518.0 feet to the North line of Imt 12 of the Parker Tract as shown
on a map ~reoo~_rded in Book 4, page 49 of M/scellaneous Maps of ~aid
~t, along last said North line a~ its ~terly prulo~ation,
806.8 feet to the ~t line of the Artesia Street ~k-act as shown on
a map r~rded in Book 4, page 30 of F~!laneous Maps of said
Orange County; thenos,
North, along the Northerly prolongation of last said ~a~t line,
369.6 feet to the South line of Fifth Street; thence,
West, along last said South l~ne, 1794.3 feet to the Southerly
prolongation of the ~t line of Block B, Tract No. 633 as shown on
a map r~corded in Book 19, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps of said
North, along last said prolongation ar~ East line, 305.0 feet to the
North l~ne of said Block B; thence,
West, along last said North line 476.46 feet to the Northwest line
of Lot 16 in said Block B; thence,
South 36'08'30" West, 120.0 feet to the Southwest line of said
Block B and the Nortb-~-t line of the former right-of-~ay of the
Pacific Electric Railway C~any; thenoe,
North 53'51'30" West, 1269.0 feet to the Southwest oorner of ~mt 6
as shown on a map filed in Book 30, page 23 R~zd of Surveys of
North 27'30'30" F~=t, 10.11 feet to the Sou~uhwest line of Lot 5 as
shown on last said map; thence,
North 53'51'30" Wast, 820.65 feet along last said Southwest line and
Nortb-~t line of said former right-of-way to the be~innin~ of a
non-tangent curve, concave Southeasterly an~ havin~ a radius of
11459.20 feet; said curve ~ei~g on the boum~y of the
~devalo~ent Agency of the city of Santa Aha North ~arbor Boulevard
Project Area, as es~ahlished by Or~ N.S. 1637; thenoe,
Southerly, alor~ last said curve and Northwest line of the Santa Aha
River through a centrml angle of 00'36'05" an ar~ a{~tance of 120.3
feet to the Southwesterly line of said former right-of-way; thence,
14 '
216o
Departing f~L~ last said existing p~devel~nt Area bcu~y
right-of-way the following courses ~ouun ~ ~ ~ East, 381.1 feet;
217. North 36'08'30" E~t, 10.0 feet; thence,
218. South 53'51'30" ~t, 1709.6 feet to the West line of Ixfc 1, Block C
of said Tract No. 633; therz~,
219. South, alor~ last said West line, 69.29 feet to the North line of
said Fifth Street; thence,
220. East, along last said North line, 94.88 feet to the Southwest l~ne
of said former right-of-way of the Pacific Electric Railway C~,%~any;
thence along said right-of-way the followin~ courses,
221. South 53'51'30" ~a~t, 130.79 feet to the beginnin~ of a tar~e~t
curve, concave Northeasterly and having a x~_~s of 5779.6 feet;
222. Southeast,fly, along last said curve throu~ a central angle of
00'18'00" an arc distance of 30.26 feet to the be~inning of a
tangent curve, concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 2914.83
feet; thence,
223. soutb-~terly, along last maid curve through a central an~le of
00'36'00" an arc distance of 30.52 feet to the be~lnnir~ of a
tangent curve, ooncave North-a~terly ar~ havin~ a r~us of 1959.91
feet; thence,
224. Southeasterly, along last said curve 'throu~ a central angle of
00'54'00" ~u~ ~ distance of 30.79 feet to the be~ir~g of a
tar~e~t c~-ve, concave North~terly a~d havir~ a r~{us of 1482.47
feet; thence,
225. ~:erly, along last said curve throu~ a oentral an~le of 33'03'20"
an ar= distance of 855.28 feet to the be~inning of a tangent curve,
concave Northerly and having a radius of 1959.91 feet; thence,
226. ~:erly, along last said curve throu~ a oentral angle of 00'54'00"
an ar= distance of 30.79 feet to the beginning of & tangent curve,
concave Northerly and having a radius of 2914.83 feet; thenoe,
227. Eastsrly, along last said curve thr~u~ a oentral an~le of 00'36'00"
an ax= 4istanoe of 30.52 lsat to the be~inning of a tangent curw,
ooncave Northerly and having a radius of 5779.60 feet; thence,
228. Ease~ly, along last said curve ~ough a ~ntral angle of 00'18'00"
an ar~ distance of 30.26 feet to a tangent line; thence,
229. F~t, along said tangent line, 12.3 feet to the West l~ne of
Paroel i as shown on a map recorded in Book 154, page 24 of Par~el
Maps of said Orange County; thence,
356. 5
356, °-
t
SCXfg. h~ along last said West line, 92.41 £eet; thenoe,
Continuing alon~ the Southwesterly lines of said Pamcel I the
following courses South 58'09'35" ~t, 31.06 feet; thence,
232. South 45'06'47" ~t, 21.75 feet; thence,
233. South 00'06'47" ~t~ 11.15 feet; thence,
234. ~t, along the South line of said Par~ ! 1, 299.25 feet to the ~t
li~e of Paroel 2 as shown on last said ~ap; thence,
235. South, along last said ~t li~e, 140.3 feet to the South line of
said Lot 2; thence,
236.
West, alorz3 last said South line an~ its Westerly prulongation,
1559.8 feet to the Northerly prolomgation of the ~t line of
Parce~! 7 as shown o~ a Inap filed i~ Book 145, page 46 of Parcel Maps
of said Orange County; thence,
237. South, alon~ last said prolor~ation, East line an~ its Southerly
prolon~ation, 550.5 feet to the North line of First Street; thence,
238. West, along last said North line, 380.6 feet to the F~t line of
Sullivan Street; thence,
239. 'North, along last said ~t line, 1161.6 feet to the South line of
said Fifth Street; thence,
240.
West, along last said South line, 498.6 feet to the Northeast corner
of Parcel 2 as shown on a map filed in Book 57, page 18 of ~1
Maps of said Orange County, said corner being the beginnin~ of a
non-tangent curve, concave Northerly and having a z-adius of 1242.0
feet; thence,
241. Westerly, along last said curve ~ a centzal angle of 05'20'09"
· n arc distance of 115.67 feet; thence,
242.
Continuir~ along the Northerly and Westerly ~our-~y of Parcels 1
and 2 as shown on lut said map the following =mraes Nor~
78'51'28" West, 46.69 feet to the be~i~ning of a tangent curve,
oc~cave Southease-rly and having a radius of 25.0 feet; thence,
243.
Southwesterly, along last said curve through a central angle of
74'41,38" an arc distance of 32.59 feet to the be~inni~g of a
tangent curve, concave Eas~-vly ar~ having a radius of 1148.0 feet;
thence,
244.
Southerly, along last said curve through a central an~le of
26'26'32" an ar= d4~anoe of 529.8 feet, said curve being parallel
with and distant 52.0 feet F~terly £~u the cen~-rline of Fairvtew
Street; thence,
245.
South, along last said parallel line, 764.2 feet to the So~th line
of First Street; thence,
16
· 247.
248.
249.
' 250.
246. Eastv along last said So~th li~e, 1906.2 feet to the Northerly
prolongation of the West 1~7e of T~-act No. 2752 as shown on a map
reoorded i~ Book 79, page 31 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange
South, along last said West l~ne, 887.1 feet'to the South line of
~ Avenue; thence,
~t, alor~ last said Sout~ llne, 245.0 feet to the Southerly
prolongation of the F~-~t line of Center STreet; thence,
North, along last said East li~e, 584.7 feet; thenoe,
?~t, 300.0 feet 'to & ~oint on the Northerly prolon~atlon of the
West line of Lot 44 of said Tract No. 2752, ~i~tant 300.43 feet
Northerly f'..'~L~ the Northwest corner of said Lot 44; thence,
251. South, along last said prolorgation, 128.4 feet to a paint on the
Westerly prolongation of the North line of Lot 51 of said Tract No.
2752, distant 449.01 feet Westerly frc~ the Northwest corner of said
Lot 51; thence,
252. Fa~t along lest said prolongation, 449.01 feet to the West line of
said LOt 51; thence,
253. South, along last said West line and its Southerly prolongation,
170.0 feet to the South line of Lot 50 of Said Tract No. 2752;
254. _Fa-~t, along last said South line and its ~cerly prolongation,
250.94 feet to the ~a~t line of Daisy Street; thence,
255. North, along last said East line, 285.9 feet to the South line of
Walnut Street; thence,
256. ~t, along last said South line, 521.9 feet to the ~a~t line of
Raitt Street; thence,
257. North, along lest said East line, 12.0 feet to the South line of
said Walnut Street; thence,
258. East, along last said So~th l~e, 443.4 feet to the We~t lt~e of
~-act No. 2494 as show~ en a ]pap recor~~ in ~ 100, page 50 of
M/scellanecus Maps of said Orange County; thence,
259. South, alor~ last said West line, 12.0 feet to the South lh~e of
said Walnut Street; thence,
260. ~t, along iast said South line, 1592.2 feet to the ~-~t line of
Lot 9, Tract No. 2678 as shown on a map _reo?ra__~4 in Book 83, page 13
of Mi__~ce!laneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
261. Sc~th, along last said ~t line and its Southerly prolon~ation,
139.0 feet to the South line of said Tract No. 2678; thence,
356. t7
17
35,6, *2.
263.
264 ·
265.
266.
267.
268.
269.
270.
271.
272.
273,
274.
275.
276.
277.
~a~t, alonc3 last said South line, 20.0 feet to the ~t line of said
Tract No. 2678; thenoe,
South, alor~ last said East li~e and its southerly prolongation,
122.0 feet to the North line of PJ~e Street; thence,
West, along last said North line, 54.4 feet to the Northerly
prolongation of the West line of Hesperian Street; thence,
South, along last said prolongation and West line, 553.7 feet to the
be~iru%ing of a tangent curve, ooncave Ease--~ly and having a tad/us
of 330.0 feet; thence,
Southerly, along last said curve th~ a central angle of
16'24'30" an arc length of 94.5 feet to the ~31nn~ of a tanc3ent
curve concave Northwesterly and having a radi~s of 10.0 feet; thence,
Southwesterly, along last said curve thr~ a contral angle of
106'24'30" an ~r~ length of 18.57 feet; thence,
South, 60.0 feet to a point on the South line of Myrtle Street
R;~tant Westerly 33.8 feet f~.-i, the West line of He_~perian Street as
it exists South of said Myrtle Street; thence,
~a~t, along last said South line, 33.8 feet to last said West line
of Hesperian Street; thence,
South, along last said West line and its Southerly prolongation,
663.3 feet to the South line of Willits Street; thence,
F~t, along last said South line, 53.0 feet to the West line of
Lot 7, Tract No. 1457 as sh6wn on a map _rec~_ rded in Book 53, page 2
of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thenoe,
South along last said West line and its Southerly prolongation,
633.9 feet to the North line of Lot 99, Tract No. 2325 as shown on a
map _reco__rded in Book 68, page 40 of Misoellanectk~ Maps of said
~=t, along last said North line, 28.0 feet to the East line of said
Lot 99; thence,
South, alon~ last said ~t line, 111.88 feet to the North line of
Tolliver Street; thence,
West, along last said North line, 88.0 feet to the Northerly
prolongation of the West line of X~-s~marian St-r~et; thence,
South, along last said West l~ne, 846.0 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve, concave Northwe-~-rly and hav~ a radius of 15.0
feet; thenoe,
Southwesterly, along last said curve ~ a central angle of
90'02'49" a~ arc ler~3th of 23.57 feet; thence,
18
278.
279.
280. --
28:1
282
283.
284.
S~uth 10'57'43" West, 61.2 feet to a point on the South line of
n,hhon_ Street, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent
curve, concave Southerly and having a r~us of 45.0 feet; thence,
F~terly, along last said curve through a central angle of 33'33'26"
an arc length of 26.36 feet to the begi~g of a tar~ent curve,
concave Northerly and having a radius of 45.0 feet; thenoe,
Eas~rly, along last said cur~e through a central angle of 25'27'58"
an arc length of 20.0 feet to the Nortb~terly line of Lot 59 of
said ~-act No. 2325; the/~De,
South 22'53'35" ~t, 108.36 feet along last said Nortb~-ase-rly li~e
to the South line of said Lot 59; thence,
285.
286.
287.
West, along last said South line, 7.39 feet to the Northerly
prolongation of the West llne of Lot 18 of said Tract No. 2325;
thence,
South, along last said prolongation, West line and its S~atherly
prolongation, 138.68 feet to the North line of McFadden Avenue;
West, along last said North line 567.8 feet to the Northerly
prolongation of the East line of Pacific Avenue; thence,
South, along last said prolongation and said _~t line of Pacific
Avenue, 84.0 feet to a li~e parallel with and ~{~tant 84.0 feet
Southerly from the South line of said Tract No. 2325; ther~e,
East, along last said parallel line, 190.0 feet to a line parallel
with and distant Fm~terly 180.0 feet fz~ said East line of Pacific
Avenue 163.32 feet; thence,
South, along last said parallel line, 163.32 feet to a point in the
North line of a 20.0 feet wide alley shown on a map of Tract
No. 3245 recorded in Book 102, pages 36 and 37 of Misoellane~x~s Map~
of said Orange County, said point being 180.28 feet West of the
Nortb-~t corner of said Tract No. 3245; thence,
288.
289.
Pa~t, along last said North line, 180.28 feet to the Nortb-a-t
corrm_r of said Tract No. 3245; thence,
South, alorg the Fa~t line of sakd Tract No. 3245, 821.68 feet to
the Southeast corner of sa~d Tract No. 3245; thenoe,
290.
~t, along the North line of Lot 20 of Tract No. 3244, as shown on
that certain map recorded in Book 99, pa~es 14 and 15 of
M/soellaneo~s Maps of said Oz-unge County, 121.96 feet to the
Nort~t corner of said Lot 20; thence,
291.
South, alon~ the ~t line of last said Lot 25.69 feet, to a point
in a non-tangent curve concave East,fly, having a radius of 45.0
feet; thence,
356.1q
19
292.
· 293.
294.
295.
296.
297 ·
298.
299.
300.
301..
302.
303.
304.
Southwesterly and Southeasterly along the ~t line of Lots 20 and
19 of said Tzact No. 3244 an aru R{~+~nce of 97.04 feet through a
central angle of 123'33'26" to a point of reverse curve concave
Wetly, havir~ a radius of 45.0 feet; t/~ence,
Southerly,' alon~ last sa/d ~ (~urve 26.36 feet,' thruugh a ......
central angle of 33'33'26".to a talent line; thenoe,
South, al~ last said tangent line and its prolongation, 770.25
feet to a point in the South line of Elder Street as ~hown on that
oertain map of Tract No. 1574 as shown on that oertain ~p ~re~rded
in Book 47, page 18, M/~cellanecus Mape of said Orange Oounty;
~t, along said South line, 98.0 feet to the Nortb-a<t corner of
Lot 80 of said %~z-act No. 1574; t~,
South, 100.0 feet along the ~t ii~e of said I~t 80, to a point in
the North li~e of Lot 16 of Tract No. 1508 as ~hown on that certain
map ~reco_~r~ in Book 45, page 40 of M/scellaneous Maps of said
~e County; thence,
~t, 6.0 feet along said North line of Lot 16 to the Nortb-a~t
corner of said Lot 16; thence,
South, 100.0 feet along the ~t line of said Lot 16 to the
Scuth--~t corner of said Lot 16, said south-~t corner being a
point in the North line of Borchard Avenue; thence,
West, along last said North line, 132.0 feet to the Northerly
prolongation of the West line of Hesperian Street; thence,
South, along last said .prolongation and West line of Hesperian
Street, 522.50 feet to the Soutb-~t corner of Imt 27 of said Tract
No. 1508, last said South-~t corner being a point in the North
line of Edinger Avenue; thence,
West, along last said North line, 571.37 feet to the Northerly
prolongation of the West line of Pacific Avenue, as sh~n on that
oer~ ~ap of ~k-act No. 4442 z~oorded ~ Book 165, pagee 37 ar~ 38
of M/scellansous Maps of said O~-an~e Oounty; thence,
South, 302.02 feet along l~st said Northerly prolongat/on and the
West line of Pacific Avenue, to the Westerly prolongation of the
South line of Lot 18 of said ~k~ct No. 4442; thence,
~a~t, 179.15 feet alon~ last said Westerly prolongation and South
line of said Lot 18 to the ~=t line of said Tract No. 4442; thence,
South, along last said ~t line, 389.34 feet to the Southeast
corner of said Tract No. 4442, said Scuth-~t corner being also a
point in the North line of Tx-act No. 4163, as shown on that ~_~tain
map r~?rded in Book 146, pages 30, 31 and 32 of Misoellaneous Maps
of said Orange County; thence,
20
305,
306.
307.
308.
309.
F~t, alor~ last ~aid North line, 213.11 feet to the East line of
said Tract No. 4163; ~,
South, along last said ~t line 668.45 feet to the North line of
Tract No. 2209, as sh~w~ on that certai~ ~a9 -reo?~a~ i~ Book 64,
pages 25 ar~ 26 of Misce!.la~t~ Map~ .of said Orange-County;' thence,
~-~t, along last said North line, 305.0 feet to the East line of
Lot 95 of said Tract No. 2209; thenoe,
South, along last said East line and it~ prolongation, 1486.44 feet
to the North line of St. Gert~-~, Place; thenoe,
West, along last said North line, 251 feet to a line parallel with
and R{_~tant 509.0 feet Westerly fL~ the ~-~t line of Tract
No. 2209, as shown on that certain ~ap r~ooz~ ~.n Book 64, pages
25 a~d 26 of Miscellar~/s ]~aps of said Or~e County; the~Tce,
310. South, along last said parallel line, 1249.65 feet to the South
line of Warner Avenue; thence,
311. East, along last said South line, 367.0 feet to the most ~a~terly
line of Tract No. 10602, as sh~n on that _~tain map recorded in
Book 462, pages 35 a~d 36 of M/scellaneous Maps of said Orange
312. South, 150.0 feet along last said most Easterly line to a line
parallel with and distant Southerly 150.0 feet fr~ last said Sou~
line; thence,
313. West, 35.0 feet along last said parallel line to a line parallel
with and distant Wast~rly 35.0 feet frc~ last said most Fa~terly
314. South, 150.0 feet along last said parallel line to the South line
of said Tract No. 10602; thence,
315. West, 181.78 feet along last said South li~e to a l~ne pax~11el
with and distant Westerly 216.78 feet f~., last said ~,ost Ease~ly
line, said parallel line also being the West line of Parcel 1, es
shown on that cm~tain map reoorded in Book 27, page 24 of Parcel
Maps of said Orange County; thence,
316. South, ~25.04 feet alon~ said West line of said paroel 1 to the
South line of said Parcel; thence,
317. ~a~t, 209.91 feet alon~ said South line of said Parcel I to the
West line of Parc?~ 2 Of last said Parcel Map; thence,
318. So~th, 663.85 feet along last said West l~ne and its Southerly
prolorgation to the South line of Central Avenue; thence,
356,
21
356,
......' '320
321.
322.
323 ·
324.
325.
326.
327.
328.
329.
330.
331,
332.
~t, along last said South line, 812.35 feet to the Southerly
prolongation of the West l~ne of Tract No. 9396, es shown on that
~tai~ ~p l"g~O~ ~ ~ ~ 400, l:~g~ 15 through 19, of
Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thenoe,
North, 554.'~0 feet along last said Southerly prolongation and said ....
West li~e of Tract No. 9396, to the North ll~e of last said
thence,
~t, 388.43 feet along last said North line of ~d ~act No. 9396
to the ~a~t line of Parcel 2, es shown on that oere~{n map ~re~nrded
in Book 68, page 29 of Parce~! Maps of said Orange O0unty; thence,
North, along last said ~*~t li~e and the ~-t line of Paroel 3 of
last said map, 750.41 feet to the South line of Warner Avenue;
thence,
West, along last said South 1/ne, 218.32 feet to the Southerly
prolongation of the West line of Rosewood Avenue, as shown on that
certain map of Tract No. 1192 r~enrded in Book 39, page 17 of
M/scellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
North, along lest said prolongation, 94.0 feet to the prolongation
of the North line of Warner Avenue; thence,
West, along last said North line, 472.01 feet to the prolongation
of the East line of Magnolia Avenue, as shown on said map of Tract
No. 1192; thence,
North, along lest said Fm~t l~u%e, 1017.21 feet to the North line of
St. ~e Place; thence,
West, along last said North line, 40.0 feet to the East line of Lot
204 of said Tract No. 1192; thence,
North, along last said ~<t line, 112.11 feet to the South line of
Tract No. 1383, as show~ on that certain map reoorded in Book 41,
page 47 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
Fa~t, along last said South line, 35.91 feet to the ~t line of
Lot 36 of said Tract No. 1383; thence,
North, along last said ~t line and its prolomcgatton, 1266.51 feet
to the North line of St. Andrews Place as shown on that certain map
of ~Xact No. 1378 recorded in Book 41, page 28 of Miscellaneous
Maps of said Orange County; thenoe,
West, along last said North line, 24.86 feet to the ~t line of
Lot 4 of said Tract No. 1378; thenoe,
North, along last said ~t line, 110.0 feet to th~ North line of
last said Tract No. 1378; thence,
22
333. F~t, along last said North line and the North line of Tract
No. 1367, as shown on that certain map recozded in Book 41, page 25
of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange Oounty, 415.22 feet to the
Fm~t li~e of Ba]~-r Street, as shown on ~{d ~ap of Tract No. 1367;
334. North, alor~ last said East line an~ its prolongation, 1358.51 feet
to the North line of m4~nger Avenue, as shown on a map of Tract No.
1415 recorded in Book 42, page~ 29, 30 and 31 of F~lla~eo~s Maps
of said 0zange County~ thence,
335. West, along last said North 1Lne, 354.45 feet to the ~t lime of
Magnolia Avenue; thence,
336. North, along said ~t line of Magnolia Avenue and its Northerly
prolongation, 2654.0 feet to the South line of the Ninir~er Tract
as shown on a map recorded in Book 8, page 33 of M~t~laneous Maps
of said Orar~e County; thence,
337. West, along the South line of said Ninlr~er Tract. 77.5 feet to a
line parallel with and distant 50.0 feet Eas~-wly fk.'-,~ the West
line of Lot 10 of said Nin/nger Tract; thence,
~38. North, along las% said parallel line, its Northerly prolongation
and the Fa~t line of Lot 8, Tract No. 543, as shown on a map
reoorded in Book 18, page 16 of F~[soellaneous Maps of said Orar~3e
County, 481.0 feet to a l~ne parallel with and distant 7.5 feet
Southerly f~, the South llne of Lot 23 of said Tract No. 543;
339. East, .along last said parallel line, 50.0 feet to the Southerly
prolongation of the East line of said Lot 23; thence,
340. North, along last said prolongation a~d East line, 137.95 feet to
the South line of Brook Street; thence,
341. North, 60.0 feet to the North li~e of ~{d Brook street a~d a point
on a line paz-allel with and ~{-~cant 330.0 Eastmrly fk.-~ said
cent~rline of Bristol Street; thenoe,
342. North, along l~st said parallel line, 135.0 feet to a line parallel
with and a{~tant 165.0 feet Southerly f~.'-.~ the oenterli~e of
343. West, along last said paz-allel line, 50.0 feet to a li~e ~-~allel
With and ~-~cant 280.0 feet Easterly f~. said oenterl~ne of
Bristol Street; thence,
344. North, along last said parallel line to th~ South line of said
Highland Street; thence,
345. North, 60.0 feet to the Soutb_-~t oorner of Lot 7, Tract No. 228,
as shown on a map recorded in Book 13, page 19 of M/scellaneou~
Maps of said Orange County; thence,
23
'347.
348.
349.
350.
351.
352.
353.
354 ·
355.
356.
357.
358.
359.
360.
North, along the East line of said Lot 7 and its Northerly
prolongation, 330.0 feet to the South line of Tract No. 1470, as
shown on a ~ap r~orded /zt Book 44, page 25 of Misoellanecx/s Maps
of said Orange County; thence,
West, along last said South-line, li.9 feet to the ~t line of
Lot 4 of said Tract No. 1470; thenoe,
North, along last said ~t line and its Northerly prolongation,
269.0 feet to the South line of ~aymar Street; thence,
North, 60.0 feet to the South~t ~orner of Lot 24 of said Tract
No. 1470; thence,
North, alor~ the ~t line of said Lot 24, 134.55 feet to the North
line of said Lot 24; thence,
West, along last said North line, 6.66 feet to the ~a~t line of
Lot 32 of said Tract No. 1470; thence,
North, along last said E~st line a~ :l. ts Northerly prolongation,
195.0 feet to the South li~e of Tract No. 1406, as shown on a map
recorded in Book 43, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange
~a-~t, along last said South line, 44.0 feet to the ~t line of
Lot 5 of said Tract No. 1406; thence,
North, along last' said Fa~t line and its Northerly prolongation,
270.0 feet to the South line of Camile Street; thence,
North, 60.0 feet to the South-a~t corner of Lot 19 of said Tract
No. 1470; thence,
North, along the ;~=t line of said Imt 19, 133.68 feet to the North
llne of said Tract No. 1406; thence,
~t, along last said North line, 3.15 feet to a line parallel with
and distant 407.0 feet Westerly f~, the oenterline of Baker
Street; thence,
North, along last said parallel li~e and its Northerly
prolongation, 195.0 feet to the South line of Block D, ~act
No. 610, as shown on a map ~reco_~rded in Book 19, page 12 of
Miscellaneous Maps of said Orange County; thence,
;;~c, along last said South line, 21.8 feet to th~ ~t line of
LOt 20 of said Block D; thenoe,
Nozth, along last said ~t line and its Northerly prolongation,
466.4 feet to the South line of ~zact No. 1363, as shown on a map
~r~co~rded in Book 42, page 32 of M/scellaneous Maps of said Ox~u~e
24
361.
362.
363.
364.
365.
366.
367.
368.
369.
;a~t, alor~ last said South line, 15.0 feet to the ;a~t l~ne of Lot
18 of said Tract No. 1363; thence,
North, along last said East line and its Northerly prolor~ation,
447.6 feet to the South line of Walnut Street; thence,
~t, along last said South llne, 433.8 feet to the ~t llne of
said Baker Street; thence,
North, along last said ;~;t
said Walnut Street; thence,
~t, along l~st said South
Shelton Street; thence,
line, 19.7 feet to the South line of
line, 564.0 feet to the West line of
line, 188.0 feet to a line parallel
Northerly f~,, the centerline of said
North, along last said West
with and ~{;tant 158.0 feet
Walnut Street; thence,
;~t, along last said parallel line, 969.5 feet to the Southerly
prolongation of a line parallel with and ~;~tant 4.5 feet Westerly
f~. the ~a-~t line of Lot 8, Block P of the Hell Tract, as shown on
a map ~r~oo~rded in Book 23, page 28 of Misoellane0us ~nrds of
IDs Angeles County, ~lifornia; thenoe,
North, along last said prolongation an~ parallel line, 142.0 feet
to the South line of First Street; thenoe,
East, along last said South line, 4.5 feet to a paint on the
Southerly prolongation of the West line of Olive Street, said point
being a point in the bou~4~y of said ex]stin~ O~,,,unity
Redevelo~t A~ency of the city of Santa Aha Project Area,
ese-hl/~hed by Ord~ N.S. 1173; thenoe,
370. North, along last said prolongation, West li~e and ex/sting
~mdevelo~m~ent Area bour~y, 610.0 feet to the South line of
Street; thence,
371. West, alor~ last said South line, 1033.6 feet to the West li~%e of
said Shelton Street; thence,
372. North, along last said West line, 185.0 feet to & line
with and distant 155.0 feet Northerly f~, the oe~t-rline of said
~%trd Street; thence,
373. We.~t, along last said parallel li~e, 300.0 feet to a li~e parallel
with and ~tant 317.5 feet Westerly frc~ the oenterline of said
374. North, alorz3 last said parallel line, 113.0 feet to a line parallel
with and ~{-~cant 52.0 feet Southerly f~ sa/d centerline of
356. -
25
..!. 376.
West, ~long last ~aid parallel line, 948.4 feet to ~aid centerline
of Bristol Street~ thence,
North, along last said centerline, 104.0 feet to the point of
TO:
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
and
NOT CE OF DETE I.*TION 3 5 6'a 7
FROM: Community Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Santa Ama
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ama, CA 92702
County Clerk
County of Orange
County Administrative Center
SUBJECT:
Project Title:
and
c-y °f Ft4AL E D
20 Civic Uenter Flaza
Santa Ama, CA 92702
CEO 1 § 1§89
COMPLIA 'X'/'VlLL£ C Clerk
FILING OF NOT:CE OF DETER.INATION :N
SBCTION 21108 OR 21152 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURC__
Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project
State Clearninghouse Number: 87101404
Project Location: See Attached Project Area Map
Project Description: A 781-acre redevelopment project the overall objective
of which is the eradication of blight and the economic development of the
Project Area. The implementation of the Redevelopment Plan will involve a
series of interrelated public and private actions, including (1) potential
participation by owners and tenants and development by the private sector
consistent with the Redevelopment Plan; (2) acquisition and disposition of
land; (3) removal of substandard structures; (4) relocation activities and
advisory assistance benefits and services for displaced persons and
businesses; (5) construction of public improvements, and other improvements;
(6) rehabilitation of existing structures; (7) new comercial, industrial and
residential construction; and (8) other implementation activities required in
the furtherance of the Redevelopment Plan.
This is to advise that the Community Redevelopment Commission of Santa Ama
has approved above described Project on December 4, 1989, and have made
the following determinations regarding said Project:
1. The Project will have a significant effect on the environment.
An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this Project pursuant
to the provisions of CEQA.
Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the
Project.
A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this
Project. (See attachments.)
This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record
of Project approval is available to the General Public at: City of Santa Ann,
Administrative Center, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ama, California 92702.
Received for Filing and Posting at OPR
Date: ~C~ ft%~ /~ , 1989
GW/dt/4
, 1989.
Santa Ama Redevelopment Agency
BRISTOL CORRIDOR
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
New Project Boundery
30000
356.2q
RESOLUTION NO. 89-13
REL:mb(6)
10/12/89
A RESOLUTION OF THE SkNTA~NA COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND ADOPTING A
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
WHEREAS, Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Commission
(the "Commission") has prepared an Environmental Impact Report
(the "EIR") for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol
Corridor Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has prepared an Environmental
Impact Report (the "EIR") for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for
the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the draft EIR has been prepared and circulated
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"),
the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Community Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Santa Ana's Procedures for Implementation of CEQA
and the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Agency's Procedures"); and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the
Commission on April 5, 1988, on the EIR at which all interested
persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the final EIR, relating to the proposed Rede-
velopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project and
responding to the concerns raised during the review period and at
the public hearing, has been prepared pursuant to CEQA, the State
CEQA Guidelines, and the Agency's Procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Commission at its meeting of December 20,
1988 adopted Resolution No. 88-19 certifying tht the said final
EIR was completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guide-
lines, and the Agency's Procedures; and
WHEREAS, THE Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency
(the "Agency") has reviewed and considered the information con-
tained in the final EIR for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for
the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Santa Ana Community
Redevelopment Agency as follows:
1. The Agency certifies that the information contained in
the final EIR for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol
Corridor Redevelopment Project has been reviewed and considered by
the members of the Agency.
'356, 0
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
PAGE TWO
2. The "Findings of Fact Regarding Significant Environmental
Effects" set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated
herein, are hereby approved and adopted by the Agency.
3. The Agency further finds and determines that any and
all unavoidable significant environmental effects of the Bristol
Corridor Redevelopment Project are acceptable for the reasons set
forth in "Statement of Overriding Considerations," attached hereto
as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein.
4. The Agency hereby authorizes and directs that a Notice
of Determination with respect to the EIR pertaining to the approval
of the Redevelopment Plan and all other actions in further thereof
be filed.
ADOPTED this
by the following vote:
20th day of November , 1989,
AYES: MEMBERS
NOES: MEMBERS
ACOSTA, GRISET, MAY, MCGUIGAN,
NORTON, PULIDO, YOUNG
ABSENT: MEMBERS
ATTEST:
Executive Director/Recording
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Agency Legal Counsel
EXHIBIT A
FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONHENTAL EFFECTS
UNDER PROVISIONS OF CEQA STATUTES 2]081 AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 1509]
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Statutes Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana finds as follows:
The above referenced project has the potential to result in significant
environmental impacts on air quality, land use, traffic/circulation,
earth, flood, noise, light and glare, population, housing, schools, water,~
storm drainage, and recreation, as identified in the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the project dated November 2g, 1988. Mitigation
measures have been required in; or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant impacts as identified in ~he
EIR with the exception of air quality, land use, and traffic/circulation.
A. UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS
1. Air quality
Impact Summary. Because the project will permit and encourage the
continued development of land within the project area in accordance with
the General Plan, development in accordance with the project will result
in greater air pollutant emissions than the case in which no development
were to take place in the project area. This development occurs in a
region which does not now meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
and is not expected to meet these standards at any time in the foreseeable
future. Air pollutant emissions generated by development within the
project area exceed the threshold criteria for significance suggested by
the South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to air quality impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
substantially lessen the significant environmental impacts. Although the
mitigation measures identified will result in some reduction in project
generated air pollutant emissions, the proposed project will continue to
produce pollutants above the threshold criteria for significance suggested
by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for all pollutants
monitored. These mitigation measures include:
a. Existing streets will be improved where only partial improvements
exist to the extent redevelopment funds are available.
Adequate watering techniques will be employed to partially
mitigate the impact of construction-generated dust particles.
'Construction equipment will be properly maintained and serviced to
minimize exhaust emissions.
356, 1
356. .2
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 will be
adhered to, insuring the clean~up of construction-related dirt on
approach routes to construction sites.
The use of energy efficient lighting along Bristol Street (low
pressure sodium vapor lights) shall be considered to reduce
emissions at the power plant servicing the area.
f. Traffic signals along Bristol Street shall be synchronized.
g. Construction activities shall be halted during local Stage Two
smog alerts.
h. Transportation System Management (TSM) Plan shall be developed to
reduce tripmaking.
Other changes are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of the South
Coast Air Quality Management District and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. These agencies are concerned with reducing the
cumulative air pollution effects of growth in the region and include
measures adopted by these agencies to steadily improve vehicle emission
requirements and emission controls on stationary air pollution sources.
2. Land Use
Impact Summary. The proposed project will result in more intensive use of
the project area than currently exists. Intensification will result in
the loss of some existing businesses and residential units as a result of
implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan and changes in land use
designations. This increased development may not, in some locations, be
compatible with adjoining residential uses and may generate conflicts,
such as traffic, noise, bulk and height of structures at the
residential/commercial interface. Presently vacant land will be
irretrievably committed to urban uses.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to-land use impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which will avoid
or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as
identified in the EIR. Although the mitigation measures identified in the
EIR will lessen project impacts, the increased development and intensity
of development over existing conditions cannot be fully mitigated. These
mitigation measures include:
The Agency may choose to exercise additional control over
development through adoption of a design guide for the project
area, parts of the project area, or specific development parcels.
Additional mitigation measures to reduce potential land use
conflicts at the residential/commercial interface include the
construction of walls to screen development; the use of
landscaping; and setback requirements included in the zoning
ordinance.
With regard to changes in land use or existing development, the proposed
Redevelopment Plan will be consistent with the General Plan as it
currently exists or may from time to time be amended.
3. Traffic/Circulation
Impact Summary. Increases !n traffic volumes have the potential to reduce
intersection levels of service below an acceptable level.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to traffic/circulation impacts,
mitigation measures or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen significant
environmental impacts as identified in the EIR. These measures include
street widening, restriping, signal modification/coordination, and parking
restrictions as described in measures 1 and 16 through 38 in Section 3.13
Transportation/Circulation of the Final EIR. These measures are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Additional mitigation measures within the project area are under the
jurisdiction of the City of Santa Ana and are originally included in the
Bristol Street Widening Project EIS/EIR (measures 2 through 15 in Section
3.13 Transportation/Circulation of the Final EIR for this redevelopment
project). Without these measures, the proposed Redevelopment Plan cannot
be mitigated to less than significant levels.
B. SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS WHICH CAN BE AVOIDED OR SUBSTANTIALLY LESSENED
1. Earth
Impact Summary. The location of the project area in southern California
exposes people to the potential for groundshaking in the event of an
earthquake. Increased employment and development within the project area
will expose additional people and structures to this potential hazard.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to earth/seismic impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
will avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects as identified
in the EIR. These measures include:
All construction and development within the project area will
in compliance with applicable City and State statutes, codes,
ordinances and regulations.
be
b. Soil and geologic studies will be required for development on an
individual basis and deficiencies corrected, if necessary.
Straw or other suitable materials will be placed over uncovered
soils, as needed, during construction activities to reduce erosion
potential.
3
do
Temporary culverts, ditches, catch basins, dams and settling ponds
will be installed where needed during construction activities to
maintain drainage flows and-to Collect excess water and sediments
flowing out of construction sites. Sediments collected will be
disposed of at a Class II or Class III disposal site.
2. Flood
Impact Summary. A portion of the project area is located within the Santa
Ana River channel and portions of the project area are located within the
designated lO0-year flood zone. Increased development in these areas will
be at some risk.
Mitiqation Measures. With regards to flood impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the EIR.
These measures include project improvements to the storm drain system
which are included as part of the proposed project to the extent
redevelopment funds are available.
The Federal Flood Insurance Agency (FIA) may require additional mitigation
measures to qualify for federal insurance programs including requirements
that all structures built within the flood hazard area must have the first
habitable floor elevated above the surface level of flooding and
demonstration that the cumulative impact of proposed development would not
raise the depth of flooding by more than one foot at any point in the
community.
3. Noise
Impact Summary. Project-generated traffic will result in minor increases
in ambient noise levels. Residential units previously screened from
street noise may be exposed to higher noise levels as a result of street
widening and demolition of existing structures.
Construction related noise may reac~.significant levels in the short term.
Mitiqation Measures. With regard to noise impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the EIR.
These measures include:
a. Construction activities will take place only during the hours
specified in the City of Santa Ana Noise Control Ordinance.
b. To the extent feasible, construction activities will be screened
from adjacent noise-sensitive land uses.
c. All construction equipment shall be equipped with properly
operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems.
d. Stationary equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is
directed away from sensitive noise receptors.
4
356, 5"
Any residential barriers that are removed in conjunction with
Agency action shall be replaced with barriers at least six feet in
height.
Where structures providing a sound barrier are removed by the
project and new barriers cannot be constructed because of site
design considerations, sound insulation for existing residential
structures shall be provided by the developer to meet the interior
noise levels of the California State Sound Insulation Standards.
g. Sound insulation will be included in all new multi-family
residential construction as required by State law.
With regard to noise impacts resulting from the Bristol Street Widening
Project, the City of Santa Ana will construct barriers where required, at
the City's expense.
4. Light and Glare.
Impact Summary. Increased lighting, both in terms of intensity and level,
will result from implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to light and glare impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the
EIR. These measures include:
a. New street lights shall utilize cut-off luminaries to minimize
light spillover to residences.
The City's and Agency's design review of all private projects
shall include review of lighting plans to ensure minimal
spillover.
c. Building construction shall avoid excessive amounts of reflective
glass that will create glare, for motorists or residents.
B. Population
Impact Summary. The provision of additional employment opportunities
within the project area has the potential to encourage population growth
in the project's housing and employment market area. Implementation of
the proposed Redevelopment Plan could increase employment in the project
area by 45 percent.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to population impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen these significant effects as identified in
the EIR. These measures include phasing development over the 3S-year life
of the Redevelopment Plan in order to allow a gradual increase in
employment within the project area.
356
6. Housinq
Impact Summary. Implementatfon of the Redevelopment Plan will result in
the intensification and reassembly of existing commercial uses, and the
t~..~.ho~introduction of office uses. These changes in lind use will result in the
ntial loss of approximately 348 existing residential units. Many of
e~'homes represent existing non-conforming uses, while providing
housing for low and moderate income households.
Nitiqation Measures. With regard to housing, mitigation measures have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified
in the EIR. lhese measures include:
State law requires that 20 percent of the tax increment revenue
generated by redevelopment in the project area shall be set aside
for low and moderate income housing. These funds are available to
benefit low and moderate income housing throughout the City.
For those housing units displaced, State law requires the Agency
to pay fair market price for the units, and to pay relocation
costs and differential costs of finding an equivalent unit and
financing.
c. All low and moderate income units removed will be replaced on a
one-for-one basis, as required by State law.
Within the project area, 15 percent of the housing developed or
rehabilitated by public or private entities will be for affordable
housing. Not less than 40 percent of this 15 percent will be
available to very low income persons or families.
7. Schools
Impact Summary. Increased employment and housing generated by the
proposed project may be expected to.add additional school-aged children to
an already overcrowded school system.
Mitiqation Measures. With regard to school impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified
in the EIR. These measures include:
The Agency may decide to use tax increment money required by law
to benefit low and moderate income housing in an area of the City
where the District is experiencing less overcrowding, if such an
area exists.
The Agency may choose to improve existing housing or provide
senior housing, both of which will not further impact the school
system.
6
356. 7
With regard to additional funding for school facilities, the Santa Aha
School District will directly levy school impact fees, dedications, or
other requirements for temporary or permanent facilities construction.
Schools also receive State funding. If new schools or classrooms are
required as a result of the project, funding will be available from the
state program to provide these facilities.
8. Water
Impact Summary. Increases in development intensity within the project
area will create an additional demand on City water supplies.
Mitiqation Measures. With regard to water consumption, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as
identified in the EIR. These measures include:
a. Water mains will be installed in selected areas as part of the
project to the extent redevelopment funds are available.
State laws require the installation of water efficient plumbing
fixtures, including low or ultra-low flow toilets and showers in
new structures.
Relevant sections of litle 20 and Title 24 of the California
Administrative Code regarding water consumption and conservation
will be enforced.
g. Storm Drainaqe
Impact SummarY. Increased coverage of the area with impervious surfaces
will increase the speed and amount of runoff from the project area.
Current City and County drainage facilities contain deficiencies and
require improvements.
Mitiqation Measures.. With regard te.storm drainage, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen significant environmental effects as identified in
the EIR. Improvements to the City storm drain system are included as part
of the project to the extent redevelopment funds are available.
Development will also be phased over the lifetime of the Redevelopment
Plan as improvements to the storm drain system are implemented.
10: Recreation
Imoact Summary. Increased housing and population within the project area
will increase demand on existing recreational facilities.
Hitigation Heasures. With regard to recreation impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen signlflcaht environmental impacts as
identified in the EIR. lhese measures include setting aside undevelopable
surplus land from street widening for open space and linear parks.
The School District is proposing two additional elementary schools within
the project area and the District will be encouraged to consider the
development of additional recreation areas at these sites.
C. ALTERNATIVES
Alternatives to the proposed project were considered, but specific
economic, social or other considerations make infeasible these
alternatives. These alternatives were found to be infeasible for the
following reasons:
No Project Alternative
The specific alternative of "no project" has been evaluated but is
unacceptable because it would not allow implementation of a redevelopment
project with the intention of eradicating blighted conditions which is a
declared public purpose. Because redevelopment tax increment financing
will not be available to assist in construction and installation of
necessary public improvements in the project area, this alternative will
place an economic burden on the City for support of the land use in the
project area. Benefits to the residents and the City of Santa Ana in
terms of increased tax revenue, increased employment, and secondary
benefits will not be realized. Abandoned, obsolete and unattractive
commercial and residential facilities will be expected to continue to
exist in the project area, maintaining an undesirable environment for the
development of new businesses and delaying the improvement of the area.
Street Wideninq Only
The specific alternative of widening iBristol Street without redevelopment
has been evaluated but is unacceptable because it would not meet the basic
intention of redevelopment by eradicating blighted conditions which is a
declared public purpose. Because redevelopment funding would not be
available for street widening, alternate sources of funding would be
required. Alternative funding has not been identified and street widening
could be substantially delayed at additional costs. Benefits to the
residents and the City of Santa Ana in the form of increased tax revenue
and employment opportunities would not be realized. Abandoned, obsolete
and unattractive commercial and residential facilities will be expected to
continue to exist in the project area, maintaining an undesirable
environment for the development of new businesses and delaying area
improvement.
356. $
Reduced Intensity of the Project Area
The specific alternative of reduced intensity of the project area has been
evaluated but is unacceptable because it would restrict development
potential below levels allowed in the project area and will prevent the
land from reaching its full development potential. Because less increase
in property values would result in the project area, less income to the
Agency for public improvements would be available.
Reduced project Size
The specific alternative of reduced project size has been evaluated but is
unacceptable because it would not fulfill the objective of redevelopment
which is the elimination of blight, a declared public purpose. By
eliminating parcels from the project area, the entire area identified as
blighted would not be expected to benefit from redevelopment, and pockets
or sections would continue to be undesirable for new development creating
potential visual and land use conflicts.
Alternative Fundinq Mechanisms
The specific alternative of alternative funding mechanisms has been
evaluated and is considered unacceptable because, although alternative
funding mechanisms may exist, these funding sources cannot be assured and
the scheduled improvements necessary for redevelopment may be
substantially delayed and hamper other redevelopment efforts.
Alternative Land Uses
The specific alternative of alternative land uses has been evaluated and
in unacceptable because this alternative would result in a Redevelopment
Plan that is inconsistent with the City's General Plan.
Alternate Location
The specific alternative of alternatiye project location has been evaluated
and is unacceptable because the benefits associated with redevelopment
would be unavailable to this area already selected for redevelopment
because findings have been made that identify this area as blighted and in
need of assistance. Other areas of the City in need of redevelopment have
already been included in other redevelopment project areas.
... 3 5 6. dc, EYd'IIBIT
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
SECTION 15093
BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPHENT PROJECT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Statutes Section 21002 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Aha finds as follows:
Approval of the above referenced project allows the occurrence of
significant effects which are identified in the Final EIR and are not
substantially mitigated. Specifically, {1) the project will generate
air pollutants which exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management
District suggested threshold criteria for significance in a region
that ~oes not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
ozone; (2) the project will result in the intensification of
development compared to existing conditions which will result in the
loss of some existing businesses, the irretrievable commitment of
vacant land to urban uses, and may not, at some locations, be
compatible with adjoining residential uses; and {3) the traffic
generated by the project will result in significant impacts along
Bristol Street and major east-west arterials.
The following benefits of the project have been evaluated by the
Community Redevelopment Agency, and following due consideration, have
been found to outweigh the environmental risks of the project:
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
eliminate blight and blighting conditions identified within the
project area.
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
promote the suitable development of the project area by assembly of
appropriate sites for new dey~lopment, which will increase the
property tax base and revenues to the Community Redevelopment
Agency, as well as potentially increasing.revenues to the City's
General Fund.
Co
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
provide necessary public improvements, and incorporate thematic
signage and landscaping that would create a more suitable
environment to encourage private development.
The proposed project will improve the quality of life for people
living and working within the project area by improving the
seismic and fire safety by constructing buildings to current
safety standards.
47g.c
356.4t
The proposed project, as proposed, will include the development of
linear parks along Bristol Street which will increase the active
and passive recreational oPportUnities for the public.
Based upon the final EIR and other documents and information in the record
with respect to the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, all remaining,
unavoidable significant effects of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are
overridden by the benefits of the project.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-11
REL:mb(6)
10/12/89
A RESOLUTION OF THE SANTA ANA COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION APPROVING THE
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL
CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOM-
MENDING ITS ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL,
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING THE ENVIRON-
MENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS
WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Com-
mission (the "Commission"), acting pursuant to section 33202
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, has
prepared a Redevelopment Plan for the proposed Bristol Corridor
Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the Commission as a lead agency has prepared
an Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR") for the proposed
Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project;
and
WHEREAS, the draft EIR has been prepared and circulated
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"),
the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Community Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Santa Ana's Procedures for Implementation of CEQA
Guidelines (the "Agency's Procedures"); and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was
Commission on April 5, 1988, on the EIR~at which all
persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and
held by the
interested
WHEREAS, the final EIR, relating to the proposed Rede-
velopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project and
responding to the concerns raised during the review period and at
the public hearing, has been prepared pursuant to CEQA, the State
CEQA Guidelines, and the Agency's Procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Commission at its meeting of December 20,
1988 adopted Resolution No. 88-19 certifying that the said final
EIR was completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guide-
lines, and the Agency's Procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed and considered the
information contained in the final EIR for the proposed Redevelop-
ment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the Commission held a duly noticed joint public
hearing with the Redevelopment Agency and City Council of the City
RESOLUTION NO. 89-~
PAGE TWO
356, t
of Santa Ana on October 17, 1989 on the Redevelopment Plan for the
Bristol Corridor' Redevelopment Pro3ect;'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Santa Aha Community
Redevelopment Commission as follows:
1. The Commission hereby approves the Redevelopment Plan for
the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, and recommends to the
City Council of the City of Santa Ana that said Redevelopment Plan
be adopted by Ordinance.
2. The Commission certifies that the information contained
in the final EIR for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol
Corridor Redevelopment Project has been reviewed and considered by
the members of the Commission.
3. The "Findings of Fact Regarding Significant Environmental
Effects" set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated
herein, are hereby approved and adopted by the Commission.
4. The Commission further finds and determines that any and
all inavoidable significant environmental effects of the Bristol
Corridor Redevelopment Project are acceptable for the reasons set
forth in "Statement of Overriding Considerations," attached hereto
as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein.
ADOPTED this 6TH day of November , 1989,
by the following vote:
AYES:
MEMBERS ALLENAN, MACK, ROSENOW, STIEN8
NOES: MEMBERS RAYA
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Cynthia J. ~elson
Executive Director/Recording
Secretary
MEMBERS ESPARZA, GOSSE
KATHLEEN ROSE~IOW
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
356.9~ a~ 356.
FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONHENTAL EFFECTS
UNDER PROVISION5 OF CEQA STATUTES 21081 AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15091
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Statutes Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Aha finds as follows:
The above referenced project has the potential to result in significant
environmental impacts on air quality, land use, traffic/circulation,
earth, flood, noise, light and glare, population, housing, schools, water,
storm drainage, and recreation, as identified in the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the project dated November 29, 1988. Mitigation
measures have been required in; or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant impacts as identified in ~he
EIR with the exception of air quality, land use, and traffic/circulation.
A. UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS
1. Air quality
Impact Summary. Because the project will permit and encourage the
continued development of land within the project area in accordance with
the General Plan, development in accordance with the project will result
in greater air pollutant emissions than the case in which no development
were to take place in the project area. This development occurs in a
region which does not now meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
and is not expected to meet these standards at any time in the foreseeable
future~ Air pollutant emissions generated by development within the
project area exceed the threshold criteria for significance suggested by
the South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to air quality impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
substantially lessen the significant environmental impacts. Although the
mitigation measures identified will result in some reduction in project
generated air pollutant emissions, the proposed project will continue to
produce pollutants above the threshold criteria for significance suggested
by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for all pollutants
monitored. These mitigation measures include:
a. Existing streets will be improved where only partial improvements
exist to the extent redevelopment funds are available.
bJ
Adequate watering techniques will be employed to partially
mitigate the impact of construction-generated dust particles.
Construction equipment will be properly maintained and serviced to
minimize exhaust emissions.
do
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 will be
adhered to, insuring the clean-up of construction-related dirt on
approach routes to construction sites.
eo
The use of energy efficient lighting along Bristol Street (low
pressure sodium vapor lights) shall be considered to reduce
emissions at the power plant servicing the area.
f. Traffic signals along Bristol Street shall be synchronized.
g. Construction activities shall be halted during local Stage Two
smog alerts.
h. Transportation System Management (TSM) Plan shall be developed to
reduce tripmaking.
Other changes are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of the South
Coast Air Quality Management District and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. These agencies are concerned with reducing the
cumulative air pollution effects of growth in the region and include
measures adopted by these agencies to steadily improve vehicle emission
requirements and emission controls on stationary air pollution sources.
2. Land Use
Impact Summary. The proposed project will result in more intensive use of
the project area than currently exists. Intensification will result in
the loss of some existing businesses and residential units as a result of
implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan and changes in land use
designations. This increased development may not, in some locations, be
compatible with adjoining residential uses and may generate conflicts,
such as traffic, noise, bulk and height of structures at the
residential/commercial interface. Presently vacant land will be
irretrievably committed to urban uses.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to-land use impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which will avoid
or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as
identified in the EIR. Although the mitigation measures identified in the
EIR will lessen project impacts, the increased development and intensity
of development over existing conditions cannot be fully mitigated. These
mitigation measures include:
The Agency may choose to exercise additional control over
development through adoption of a design guide for the project
area, parts of the project area, or specific development parcels.
Additional mitigation measures to reduce potential land use
conflicts at the residential/commercial interface include the
construction of walls to screen development; the use of
landscaping; and setback requirements included in the zoning
ordinance.
With regard to changes in land use or existing development, the proposed
Redevelopment Plan will be consistent with the General Plan as it
currently exists or may from time to time be amended,
3. Traffic/Circulation
Impact Summary. Increases in traffic volumes have the potential to reduce
intersection levels of service below an acceptable level.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to traffic/circulation impacts,
mitigation measures or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen significant
environmental impacts as identified in the EIR. These measures include
street widening, restriping, signal modification/coordination, and parking
restrictions as described in measures 1 and 16 through 38 in Section 3.13
Transportation/Circulation of the Final EIR. These measures are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Additional mitigation measures within the project area are under the
jurisdiction of the City of Santa Ana and are originally included in the
Bristol Street Widening Project EIS/EIR (measures 2 through 15 in Section
3.13 Transportation/Circulation of the Final EIR for this redevelopment
project). Without these measures, the proposed Redevelopment Plan cannot
be mitigated to less than significant levels.
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS WHICH CAN BE AVOIDED OR SUBSTANTIALLY LESSENED
1. Earth
Impact Summary. The location of the project area in southern California
exposes people to the potential for groundshaking in the event of an
earthquake. Increased employment and development within the project area
will expose additional people and structures to this potential hazard.
~itigation Measures. With regard to earth/seismic impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
will avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects as identified
in the EIR. These measures include:
All construction and development within the project area will be
in compliance with applicable City and State statutes, codes,
ordinances and regulations.
b. Soil and geologic studies will be required for development on an
individual basis and deficiencies corrected, if necessary.
Straw or other suitable materials will be placed over uncovered
soils, as needed, during construction activities to reduce erosion
potential.
3
356.
do
Temporary culverts, ditches, catch basins, dams and settling ponds
will be installed where needed during construction activities to
maintain drainage flows and to collect excess water and sediments
flowing out of construction sites. Sediments collected will be
disposed of at a Class II or Class III disposal site.
2. Flood
)~oact Summary. A portion of the project area is located within the Santa
Ana River channel and portions of the project area are located within the
designated lO0-year flood zone. Increased development in these areas will
be at some risk.
Hitiqation Measures. With regards to flood impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the EIR.
These measures include project improvements to the storm drain system
which are included as part of the proposed project to the extent
redevelopment funds are available.
The Federal Flood Insurance Agency (FIA) may require additional mitigation
measures to qualify for federal insurance programs including requirements
that all structures built within the flood hazard area must have the first
habitable floor elevated above the surface level of flooding and
demonstration that the cumulative impact of proposed development would not
raise the depth of flooding by more than one foot at any point in the
community.
3. Noise
Imoact Sun~ary. Project-generated traffic will result in minor increases
in ambient noise levels. Residential units previously screened from
street noise may be exposed to higher noise levels as a result of street
widening and demolition of existing structures.
Construction related noise may reach.significant levels in the short term.
Mitiqatio~ Measures. With regard to noise impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the EIR.
These measures include:
a. Construction activities will take place only during the hours
specified in the City of Santa Aha Noise Control Ordinance.
b. To the extent feasible, construction activities will be screened
from adjacent noise-sensitive land uses.
c. All construction equipment shall be equipped with properly
operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems.
d. Stationary equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is
directed away from sensitive noise receptors.
356,
Any residential barriers that are removed in conjunction with
Agency action shall be replaced with barriers at least six feet in
height.
fo
Where structures providing a sound barrier are removed by the
project and new barriers cannot be constructed because of site
design considerations, sound insulation for existing residential
structures shall be provided by the developer to meet the interior
noise levels of the California State Sound Insulation Standards.
Sound insulation will be included in all new multi-family
residential construction as required by State law.
With regard to noise impacts resulting from the Bristol Street Widening
Project, the City of Santa Ana will construct barriers where required, at
the City's expense.
4. Light and Glare.
Impact Summary. Increased lighting, both in terms of intensity and level,
will result from implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to light and glare impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the
EIR. These measures include:
a. New street lights shall utilize cut-off luminaries to minimize
light spillover to residences.
The City's and Agency's design review of all private projects
shall include review of lighting plans to ensure minimal
spillover.
c. Building construction shall avoid excessive amounts of reflective
glass that will create glare-for motorists or residents.
5. Population
Impact Summary. The provision of additional employment opportunities
within the project area has the potential to encourage population growth
in the project's housing and employment market area. Implementation of
the proposed Redevelopment Plan could increase employment in the project
area by 45 percent.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to population impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen these significant effects as identified in
the EIR. These measures include phasing development over the 35-year life
of the Redevelopment Plan in order to allow a gradual increase in
employment within the project area.
5
6. Housinq
356,$1
Impact Summary. Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan will result in
the intensification and reassembly of existing commercial uses, and the
introduction of office uses. These changes in land use will result in the
potential loss of approximately 348 existing residential units. Many of
these homes represent existing non-conforming uses, while providing
housing for low and moderate income households.
Mitiqation Measures. With regard to housing, mitigation measures have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified
in the EIR. These measures include:
State law requires that 20 percent of the tax increment revenue
generated by redevelopment in the project area shall be set aside
for low and moderate income housing. These funds are available to
benefit low and moderate income housing throughout the City.
b. For those housing units displaced, State law requires the Agency
to pay fair market price for the units, and to pay relocation
costs and differential costs of finding an equivalent unit and
financing.
c. All low and moderate income units removed will be replaced on a
one-for-one basis, as required by State law.
do
Within the project area, 15 percent of the housing developed or
rehabilitated by public or private entities will be for affordable
housing. Not less than 40 percent of this 15 percent will be
available to very low income persons or families.
7. Schools
Impact Summary. Increased employment and housing generated by the
proposed project may be expected to.add additional school-aged children to
an already overcrowded school system.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to school impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified
in the EIR. These measures include:
mo
The Agency may decide to use tax increment money required by law
to benefit low and moderate income housing in an area of the City
where the District is experiencing less overcrowding, if such an
area exists.
The Agency may choose to improve existing housing or provide
senior housing, both of which will not further impact the school
system.
,...
With regard to additional funding for school facilities, the Santa Ana
School District will directly levy school impact fees, dedications, or
other requirements for temporary or permanent facilities construction.
Schools also receive State funding. If new schools or classrooms are
required as a result of the project, funding will be available from the
state program to provide these facilities.
8. Wager
Impact Summary. Increases in development intensity within the project
area will create an additional demand on City water supplies.
Hitiqation Measures. With regard to water consumption, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as
identified in the EIR. These measures include:
a. Water mains will be installed in selected areas as part of the
project to the extent redevelopment funds are available.
State laws require the installation of water efficient plumbing
fixtures, including low or ultra-low flow toilets and showers in
new structures.
Relevant sections of Title 20 and Title 24 of the California
Administrative Code regarding water consumption and conservation
will be enforced.
9. Storm Drainaqe
Impact Summary. Increased coverage of the area with impervious surfaces
will increase the speed and amount of runoff from the project area.
Current City and County drainage facilities contain deficiencies and
require improvements.
Mitiqation Measures. With regard to-storm drainage, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen significant environmental effects as identified in
the EIR. Improvements to the City storm drain system are included as part
of the project to the extent redevelopment funds are available.
Development will also be phased over the lifetime of the Redevelopment
Plan as improvements to the storm drain system are implemented.
10. Recreation
Impact Summery. Increased housing and population within the project area
will increase demand on existing recreational facilities.
7
356.Z
Bitlqatton Neasures. With regard to recreation impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental impacts as
identified in the EIR. These measureS~include setting aside undevetopable
surplus land from street widening for open space and linear parks.
The School District is proposing two additional elementary schools within
the project area and the District will be encouraged to consider the
development of additional recreation areas at these sites.
¢. ALTERNATIVES
Alternatives to the proposed project were considered, but specific
economic, social or other considerations make infeas~ible these
alternatives. These alternatives were found to be infeasible for the
following reasons:
No Project Alternative
The specific alternative of "no project" has been evaluated but is
unacceptable because it would not allow implementation of a redevelopment
project with the intention of eradicating blighted conditions which is a
declared public purpose. Because redevelopment tax increment financing
will not be available to assist in construction and installation of
necessary public improvements in the project area, this alternative will
place an economic burden on the City for suppo.rt of the land use in the
project area. Benefits to the residents and the City of Santa Aha in
terms of increased tax revenue, increased employment, and secondary
benefits will not be realized. Abandoned, obsolete and unattractive
commercial and residential facilities will be expected to continue to
exist in the project area, maintaining an undesirable environment for the
development of new businesses and delaying the improvement of the area.
Street Wideninq Only
The specific alternative of widening .Bristol Street without redevelopment
has been evaluated but is unacceptable because it would not meet the basic
intention of redevelopment by eradicating blighted conditions which is a
declared public purpose. Because redevelopment funding would not be
available for street widening, alternate sources of funding would be
required. Alternative funding has not been identified and street widening
could be substantially delayed at additional costs. Benefits to the
residents and the City of Santa Ana in the form of increased tax revenue
and employment opportunities would not be realized. Abandoned, obsolete
and unattractive commercial and residential facilities will be expected to
continue to exist in the project area, maintaining an undesirable
environment for the development of new businesses and delaying area
improvement.
8
Reduced Intensity of the Pro~ect Area
The specific alternative of reduced intensity of the project area has been
evaluated but is unacceptable because it would restrict development
potential below levels allowed in the project area and will prevent the
land from reaching its full development potential. Because less increase
in property values would result in the project area, less income to the
Agency for public improvements would be available.
Reduced Project Size
The specific alternative of reduced project size has been evaluated but is
unacceptable because it would not fulfill the objective of redevelopment
which is the elimination of blight, a declared public purpose. By
eliminating parcels from the project area, the entire area identified as
blighted would not be expected to benefit from redevelopment, and pockets
or sections would continue to be undesirable for new development creating
potential visual and land use conflicts.
Alternative Fundinq Mechanisms
The specific alternative of alternative funding mechanisms has been
evaluated and is considered unacceptable because, although alternative
funding mechanisms may exist, these funding sources cannot be assured and
the scheduled improvements necessary for redevelopment may be
substantially delayed and hamper other redevelopment efforts.
Alternative Land Uses
The specific alternative of alternative land uses has been evaluated and
in unacceptable because this alternative would result in a Redevelopment
Plan that is inconsistent with the City's General Plan.
Alternate Location
The specific alternative of alternatilve project location has been evaluated
and is unacceptable because the benefits associated with redevelopment
would be unavailable to this area already selected for redevelopment
because findings have been made that identify this area as blighted and in
need of assistance. Other areas of the City in need of redevelopment have
already been included in other redevelopment project areas.
g
356,
EXHIBIT B
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
iN ACCORDANCE WITH CALiFORNiA £NVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIO£LIHES
$£CTION ]SO93
BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Statutes Section 21002 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana finds as follows:
Approval of the above referenced project allows the occurrence of
significant effects which are identified in the Final EIR and are not
substantially mitigated. Specifically, (1) the project will generate
air pollutants which exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management
District suggested threshold criteria for significance in a region
that ~oes not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
ozone; (2) the project will result in the intensification of
development compared to existing conditions which will result in the
loss of some existing businesses, the irretrievable commitment of
vacant land to urban uses, and may not, at some locations, be
compatible with adjoining residential uses; and {3) the traffic
generated by the project will result in significant impacts along
Bristol Street and major east-west arterials.
The following benefits of the project have been evaluated by the
Community Redevelopment Agency, and following due consideration, have
been found to outweigh the environmental risks of the project:
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
eliminate blight and blighting conditions identified within the
project area.
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
promote the suitable development of the project area by assembly of
appropriate sites for new dey~lopment, which will increase the
property tax base and revenues to the Community Redevelopment
Agency, as well as potentially increasing revenues to the City's
General Fund.
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
provide necessary public improvements, and incorporate thematic
signmge and landscaping that would create a more suitable
environment to encourage private development.
do
The proposed project will improve the quality of life for people
living and working within the project area by improving the
seismic and fire safety by constructing buildings to current
safety standards.
479.c
The proposed project, as proposed, will include the development of
linear parks along Bristol Street which will increase the active
and passive recreational opportunities for the public.
Based upon the final EIR and other documents and information in the record
with respect to the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, all remaining,
unavoidable significant effects of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are
overridden by the benefits of the project.
356. -7
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
CERTIFYING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN COMPLIANCE WITH
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND
CERTIFYING THAT THE COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED
AND CONSIDERED THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN
THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Santa Aha (the "Commission") has prepared an Environmental Impact Report
(EIH) for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor
Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the draft EIR has been prepared and circulated
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA')' the State
CEQA Guidelines, and the Redevelopment Agency's Procedures for
Implementation of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Agency's
Procedures"); and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the
Commission on April 5, 1988, at which time all interested persons were given
an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the final EIR, relating to the proposed Redevelopment
Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project and responding to the
concerns raised during the review period and at the public hearing, has
been prepared pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Agency
Procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed and considered the
information contained in the final EIR for the proposed Redevelopment Plan
for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Community
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Santa Ana, California as follows:
1. The Commission certifies that the final Environmental Impact
Report for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor
Redevelopment Project has been prepared and completed in compl/ance with
CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Agency's Procedures.
2. The Commission hereby further certifies that the information
contained in the final EIR has been reviewed and considered by the
members of the Commission.
2117.sna/4
120188/bl
4A
356.
ADOPTED this ~gt~ay of _D_e_c_e_m_b_e_r___, 1988, by the following vote.
Adler~ Alleman, Balen, Gosse, Mack, Mills, Rosenow
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
356. ?
RESOLUTION NO. 89- 110
REL:mb(6)
10/12/89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED REDE-
VELOPMENT PLAN, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Com-
mission (the "Commission") has prepared an Environmental Impact
Report (the "EIR") for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the
Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the draft EIR has been prepared and circu-
lated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA"), the State CEOA Guidelines, and the Community Redevelop-
ment Agency of the City of Santa Ana's Procedures for Implemen-
tation of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Agency's
Procedures"); and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the
Co~misslon on April 5, 1988, on the EIR at which all interested
persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the final EIR, relating to the proposed Rede-
velopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project and
responding to the concerns raised during the review period and at
the public hearing, has been prepared pursuant t° CEQA, the State
CEQA Guidelines, and the Agency's Procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Commission at its meeting of December 20,
1988 adopted Resolution No. 88-19 certifying that the said final
EIR was completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guide-
lines, and the Agency's Procedures; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana
(the "City Council") has reviewed and considered the information
contained in the final EIR for the proposed Redevelopment. Plan
for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Santa Ana as follows:
1. The City Council certifies that the information con-
tained in the final EIR for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for
the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project has been reviewed
and considered by the members of the City Council.
2. The "Findings of Fact Regarding Significant Environ-
mental Effects" set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein, are hereby approved and adopted by the
Cit~ Council.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-110
PAGE TWO
3. The City Council further finds and determines that any
and all unavoidable significant environmental effects of the
Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project are acceptable for the
reasons set forth in "Statement of Overriding Considerations,"
attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein.
4. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs that a
Notice of Determination with respect to the EIR pertaining to
the approval of the Redevelopment Plan and all other actions in
further thereof be filed.
ADOPTED this 20th day of November , 1989.
ATTEST:
~c~nice C. Guy /
lerk of the Council
COUNCILMEMBERS:
You ng Aye
Acosta Aye
Grlset Aye
May A~,e
McGuigan ~
Norton y~
Pulido y~
APPROVED AS TO FORM~
356.t.
FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONNENTAL EFFECTS
UNDER PROVISIONS OF CEQA STATUTES 21081 AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15091
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Statutes Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana finds as follows:
The above referenced project has the potential to result in significant
environmental impacts on air quality, land use, traffic/circulation,
earth, flood, noise, light and glare, population, housing, schools, water,
storm drainage, and recreation, as identified in the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the project dated November 29, lg88. Mitigation
measures have been required in; or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant impacts as identified in ~he
EIR with the exception of air quality, land use, and traffic/circulation.
A. UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS
1. Air quality
Impact Summary. Because the project will permit and encourage the
continued development of land within the project area in accordance with
the General Plan, development in accordance with the project will result
in greater air pollutant emissions than the case in which no development
were to take place in the project area. This development occurs in a
region which does not now meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
and is not expected to meet these standards at any time in the foreseeable
future. Air pollutant emissions generated by development within the
project area exceed the threshold criteria for significance suggested by
the South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to air quality impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
substantially lessen the significant environmental impacts. Although the
mitigation measures identified will result in some reduction in pr?ject
generated air pollutant emissions, the proposed project will continue to
produce pollutants above the threshold criteria for significance suggested
by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for all pollutants
monitored. These mitigation measures include:
a. Existing streets will be improved where only partial improvements
exist to the extent redevelopment funds are available.
b. Adequate watering techniques will be employed to partially
mitigate the impact of construction-generated dust particles.
c. Construction equipment will be properly maintained and serviced to
minimize exhaust emissions.
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 will be
adhered to, insuring the clean-up of construction-related dirt on
approach routes to construction sites.
The use of energy efficient lighting along Bristol Street {low
pressure sodium vapor lights) shall be considered to reduce
emissions at the power plant servicing the area.
f. Traffic signals along Bristol Street shall be synchronized.
g. Construction activities shall be halted during local Stage Two
smog alerts.
h. Transportation System Management (TSM) Plan shall be developed to
reduce tripmaking.
Other changes are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of the South
Coast Air Quality Management District and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. These agencies are concerned with reducing the
cumulative air pollution effects of growth in the region and include
measures adopted by these agencies to steadily improve vehicle emission
requirements and emission controls on stationary air pollution sources.
2. Land Use
Impact Summary. The proposed project will result in more intensive use of
the project area than currently exists. Intensification will result in
the loss of some existing businesses and residential units as a result of
implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan and changes in land use
designations. This increased development may not, in some locations, be
compatible with adjoining residential uses and may generate conflicts,
such as traffic, noise, bulk and height of structures at the
residential/commercial interface. Presently vacant land will be
irretrievably committed to urban uses.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to. land use impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which will avoid
or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as
identified in the EIR. Although the mitigation measures identified in the
EIR will lessen project impacts, the increased development and intensity
of development over existing conditions cannot be fully mitigated. These
mitigation measures include:
The Agency may choose to exercise additional control over
development through adoption of a design guide for the project
area, parts of the project area, or specific development parcels.
Additional mitigation measures to reduce potential land use
conflicts at the residential/commercial interface include the
construction of walls to screen development; the use of
landscaping; and setback requirements included in the zoning
ordinance.
With regard to changes in land use or existing development, the proposed
Redevelopment Plan will be consistent with the General Plan as it
currently exists or may from time to ti~e be amended.
3. Traffic/Circulation
Impact Summary. Increases in traffic volumes have the potential to reduce
intersection levels of service below an acceptable level.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to traffic/circulation impacts,
mitigation measures or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen significant
environmental impacts as identified in the EIR. These measures include
street widening, restriping, signal modification/coordination, and parking
restrictions as described in measures ] and 16 through 38 in Section 3.13
Transportation/Circulation of the Final EIR. These measures are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Additional mitigation measures within the project area are under the
jurisdiction of the City of Santa Ana and are originally included in the
Bristol Street Widening Project EIS/EIR {measures 2 through 15 in Section
3.13 Transportation/Circulation of the Final EIR for this redevelopment
project). Without these measures, the proposed Redevelopment Plan cannot
be mitigated to less than significant levels.
B. SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS WHICH CAN BE AVOIDED OR SUBSTANTIALLY LESSENED
1. Earth
Impact Summary. The location of the project area in southern California
exposes people to the potential for groundshaking in the event of an
earthquake. Increased employment and development within the project area
will expose additional people and structures to this potential hazard.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to earth/seismic impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
will avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects as identified
in the EIR. These measures include:
ao
All construction and development within the project area will
in compliance with applicable City and State statutes, codes,
ordinances and regulations.
be
b. Soil and geologic studies will be required for development on an
individual basis and deficiencies corrected, if necessary.
Straw or other suitable materials will be placed over uncovered
soils, as needed, during construction activities to reduce erosion
potential.
Temporary culverts, ditches, catch basins, dams and settling ponds
will be installed where needed during construction activities to
maintain drainage flows and to collect excess water and sediments
flowing out of construction sites. Sediments collected will be
disposed of at a Class I! or Class III disposal site.
2. Flood
~. A portion of the project area is located within the Santa
Ana River channel and portions of the project area are located within the
designated lO0-year flood zone. Increased.development in these areas will
be at some risk.
Mitiqation Neasures. With regards to flood impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the EIR.
These measures include project improvements to the storm drain system
which are included as part of the proposed project to the extent
redevelopment funds are available.
The Federal Flood Insurance Agency (FIA) may require additional mitigation
measures to qualify for federal insurance programs including requirements
that all structures built within the flood hazard area must have the first
habitable floor elevated above the surface level of flooding and
demonstration that the cumulative impact of proposed development would not
raise the depth of flooding by more than one foot at any point in the
community.
3. Noise
Impact Summary. Project-generated traffic will result in minor increases
in ambient noise levels. Residential units previously screened from
street noise may be exposed to higher noise levels as a result of street
widening and demolition of existing structures.
Construction related noise may reach. .significant levels in the short term.
Hitiqation Measures. With regard to noise impacts, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which ayoid or
substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the EIR.
These measures include:
a. Construction activities will take place only during the hours
specified in the City of Santa Ana Noise Control Ordinance.
b. To the extent feasible, construction activities will be screened
from adjacent noise-sensitive land uses.
c. All construction equipment shall be equipped with properly
operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems.
d. Stationary equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is
directed away from sensitive noise receptors.
356o
356. ,
Any residential bar~ierS that are removed in conjunction with
Agency action shall be replaced with barriers at least six feet in
height.
Where structures providing a sound barrier are removed by the
project and new barriers cannot be constructed because of site
design considerations, sound insulation for existing residential
structures shall be provided by the developer to meet the interior
noise levels of the California State Sound Insulation Standards.
g. Sound insulation will be included in all new multi-family
residential construction as required by State law.
With regard to noise impacts resulting from the Bristol Street Widening
Project, the City of Santa Ana will construct barriers where required, at
the City's expense.
4. ~ight and BlarA.
Impact Summary. Increased lighting, both in terms of intensity and level,
will result from implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to light and glare impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects as identified in the
EIR. These measures include:
a. New street lights shall utilize cut-off luminaries to minimize
light spillover to residences.
bo
The City's and Agency's design review of all private projects
shall include review of lighting plans to ensure minimal
spillover.
c. Building construction shall avoid excessive amounts of reflective
glass that will create glare-for motorists or residents.
Population
Impact Summary. The provision of additional employment opportunities
within the project area has the potential to encourage population growth
in the project's housing and employment market area. Implementation of
the proposed Redevelopment Plan could increase employment in the project
area by 45 percent.
Mitigation Measures. With regard to population impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen these significant effects as identified in
the EIR. These measures include phasing development over the 35-year life
of the Redevelopment Plan in order to allow a gradual increase in
employment within the project area.
, ,~r
6. Housinq
Impact Sumnlary. Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan will result in
the intensification and reassembly of existing commercial uses, and the
introduction of office uses. These changes in land use will result in the
potential loss of approximately 348 existing residential units. Many of
these homes represent existing non-conforming uses, while providing
housing for low and moderate income households.
Mitiqation Measures. With regard to housing, mitigation measures have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified
in the EIR. These measures include:
State law requires that 20 percent of the tax increment revenue
generated by redevelopment in the project area shall be set aside
for low and moderate income housing. These funds are available to
benefit low and moderate income housing throughout the City.
For those housing units displaced, State law,requires the Agency
to pay fair market price for the units, and to pay relocation
costs and differential costs of finding an equivalent unit and
financing.
c. All low and moderate income units removed will be replaced on a
one-for-one basis, as required by State law.
Within the project area, 15 percent of the housing developed or
rehabilitated by public or private entities will be for affordable
housing. Not less than 40 percent of this 15 percent will be
available to very low income persons or families.
7. Schools
Imoact Summary. Increased employment and housing generated by the
proposed project may be expected to.add additional school-aged children to
an already overcrowded school system.
Mitiqation Measures. With regard to school impacts, mitigation ~easures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified
in the EIR. These measures include:
The Agency may decide to use tax increment money required by law
to benefit low and moderate income housing in an area of the City
where the District is experiencing less overcrowding, if such an
area exists.
The Agency may choose to improve existing housing or provide
senior housing, both of which will not further impact the school
system.
6
356.
With regard to additional funding for school facilities, the Santa Ana
School District will directly l~vy school impact fees, dedications, or
other requirements for temporary or permanent facilities construction.
Schools also receive State funding. If new schools or classrooms are
required as a result of the project, funding will be available from the
state program to provide these facilities.
8. Water
Impact Summary. Increases in development intensity within the project
area will create an additional demand on City water supplies.
Mitiaation Measures. With regard to water consumption, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as
identified in the EIR. These measures include:
a. Water mains will be installed in selected areas as part of the
project to the extent redevelopment funds are available.
State laws require the installation of water efficient plumbing
fixtures, including low or ultra-low flow toilets and showers in
new structures.
Co
Relevant sections of Title 20 and Title 24 of the California
Administrative Code regarding water consumption and conservation
will be enforced.
9. Storm Drainage
Impact Summary. Increased coverage of the area with impervious surfaces
will increase the speed and amount of runoff from the project area.
Current City and County drainage facilities contain deficiencies and
require improvements.
Mitiqation Measures. With regard to-storm drainage, mitigation measures
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen significant environmental effects as identified in
the EIR. Improvements to the City storm drain system are included as part
of the project to the extenfredevelopment funds are available.
Development will also be phased over the lifetime of the Redevelopment
Plan as improvements to the storm drain system are implemented.
lO. Recreation
lmoact Summary. Increased housing and population within the project area
will increase demand on existing recreational facilities.
356.
t ation easure . With regard to recreation impacts, mitigation
measures have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental impacts as
identified in the EIR. These measures include setting aside undevelopable
surplus land from street widening for open space and linear parks.
The School District is proposing two additional elementary schools within
the project area and the District will be encouraged to consider the
development of additional recreation areas at these sites.
C. ALTERNATIVES
Alternatives to the proposed project were considered, but specific
economic, social or other considerations make infeasible these
alternatives. These alternatives were found to be infeasible for the
following reasons:
No Project Alternative
The specific alternative of "no project" has been evaluated but is
unacceptable because it would not allow implementation of a redevelopment
project with the intention of eradicating blighted conditions which is a
declared public purpose. Because redevelopment tax increment financing
will not be available to assist in construction and installation of
necessary public improvements in the project area, this alternative will
place an economic burden on the City for support of the land use in the
project area. Benefits to the residents and the City of Santa Ana in
terms of increased tax revenue, increased employment, and secondary
benefits will not be realized. Abandoned, obsolete and unattractive
commercial and residential facilities will be expected to continue to
exist in the project area, maintaining an undesirable environment for the
development of new businesses and delaying the improvement of the area.
Street Wideninq Only
The specific alternative of widening .Bristol Street without redevelopment
has been evaluated but is unacceptable because it would not meet the basic
intention of redevelopment by eradicating blighted conditions which is a
declared public purpose. Because redevelopment funding would not be
available for street widening, alternate sources of funding would be
required. Alternative funding has not been identified and street widening
could be substantially delayed at additional costs. Benefits to the
residents and the City of Santa Ana in the form of increased tax revenue
and employment opportunities would not be realized. Abandoned, obsolete
and unattractive commercial and residential facilities will be expected to
continue to exist in the project area, maintaining an undesirable
environment for the development of new businesses and delaying area
improvement.
8
,35.6. q
356,$
Reduced Intensity of the Project Area
The specific alternative of reduced intensity of the project area has been
evaluated but is unacceptable because it would restrict development
potential below levels allowed in the project area and will prevent the
land from reaching its full development potential. Because less increase
in property values would result in the project area, less income to the
Agency for public improvements would be available.
Reduced Project Size
The specific alternative of reduced project size has been evaluated but is
unacceptable because it would not fulfill the objective of redevelopment
which is the elimination of blight, a declared public purpose. By
eliminating parcels from the project area, the entire area identified as
blighted would not be expected to benefit from redevelopment, and pockets
or sections would continue to be undesirable for new development creating
potential visual and land use conflicts.
Alternative Fundinq Mechanisms
The specific alternative of alternative funding mechanisms has been
evaluated and is considered unacceptable because, although alternative
funding mechanisms may exist, these funding sources cannot be assured and
the scheduled improvements necessary for redevelopment may be
substantially delayed and hamper other redevelopment efforts.
Alternative Land Uses
The specific alternative of alternative land uses has been evaluated and
in unacceptable because this alternative would result in a Redevelopment
Plan that is inconsistent with the City's General Plan.
Alternate Location
The specific alternative of alternatiye project location has been evaluated
and is unacceptable because the benefits associated with redevelopment
would be unavailable to this area already selected for redevelopment
because findings have been made that identify this area as blighted and in
need of assistance. Other areas of the City in need of redevelopment have
already been included in other redevelopment project areas.
g
m
EXHIBIT
356,7v
STATEHENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ENVIRONHENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
SECTION 15093
BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Statutes Section 21002 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana finds as follows:
Approval of the above referenced project allows the occurrence of
significant effects which are identified in the Final EIR and are not
substantially mitigated. Specifically, (1) the project will generate
air pollutants which exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management
District suggested threshold criteria for significance in a region
that ~oes not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
ozone; (2) the project will result in the intensification of
development compared to existing conditions which will result in the
loss of some existing businesses, the irretrievable commitment of
vacant land to urban uses, and may not, at some locations, be
compatible with adjoining residential uses; and {3) the traffic
generated by the project will result in significant impacts along
Bristol Street and major east-west arterials.
The following benefits of the project have been evaluated by the
Community Redevelopment Agency, and following due consideration, have
been found to outweigh the environmental risks of the project:
Bo
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
eliminate blight and blighting conditions identified within the
project area.
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
promote the suitable development of the project area by assembly of
appropriate sites for new dey~lopment, which will increase the
property tax base and revenues to the Community Redevelopment
Agency, as well as potentially increasingrevenues to the City's
General Fund.
The project, as proposed, will allow the Redevelopment Agency to
provide necessary public improvements, and incorporate thematic
signage and landscaping that would create a more suitable
environment to encourage private development.
The proposed project will improve the,quality of life for people
living and working within the project area by improving the
seismic and fire safety by constructing buildings to current
safety standards.
1
47g.c
The proposed project, as proposed, will include the development of
linear parks along Bristol Street which will increase the active
and passive recreational opportunities for the public.
Based upon the final EIR and other documents and information in the record
with respect to the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, all remaining,
unavoidable significant effects of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are
overridden by the ben~fits of the project.