The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNS-3075 - Uncodified Local AB 2011 Implementing Ordinance RevisionORDINANCE NO. NS-3075 AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE LIST OF REPLACEMENT PARCELS AND PARCELS EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65912.114 AND 65912.124 BASED UPON WRITTEN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65912.114(i) AND 65912.124(i) WHEREAS, in 2022, the state legislature approved two bills requiring local governments, including charter cities, to approve residential development "by right' in commercial zones, under certain circumstances, where residential uses would otherwise be prohibited; and WHEREAS, one of these bills was California Assembly Bill 2011, known as the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022 ("AB 2011 "), which was approved by the legislature, signed by the Governor on September 28, 2022, and codified at Government Code sections 65912.100 through 65912.140; and WHEREAS, AB 2011 serves to override local zoning regulation in the above respect and took effect on July 1, 2023; and WHEREAS, AB 2011 specifically provides streamlined, ministerial, CEQA-exempt review for 100 percent affordable, multifamily housing development projects located in neighborhood plan areas where multifamily housing is permitted on the site and commercial zones where office, retail, or parking are a principally permitted use, where both satisfy a series of objective development standards and other requirements, as codified in Government Code section 65912.114; and WHEREAS, AB 2011 also provides streamlined, ministerial, CEQA-exempt review for mixed -income housing development projects along commercial corridors in neighborhood plan areas where multifamily housing development is permitted on the site and in commercial zones where office, retail, or parking are a principally permitted use, where both satisfy a series of objective development standards and other requirements, as codified in Government Code section 65912.124; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2023, pursuant to California Government Code sections 65912.114(i) and 65912.124(i), the City Council of the City of Santa Ana adopted Resolution No. 2023-037, Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3045, and conducted a first reading of Ordinance No. NS-3047, exempting certain properties within the City from the streamlined approval process provided by Government Code sections 65912.114 and 65912.124; and Ordinance No. NS-3075 Page 1 of 5 WHEREAS, on July 18, 2023, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana conducted a second reading of Ordinance No. NS-3047, exempting certain parcels within the City from the streamlined, ministerial approval process provided by Government Code sections 65912.114 and 65912.124; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2243 (AB 2243) was signed by the Governor on September 19, 2024, and will become effective on January 1, 2025, amending AB 2011 by modifying a number of eligibility criteria and development standards in state law to permit streamlined, ministerial approval processes for certain housing developments, one of which is removing the 500-foot freeway buffer; and WHEREAS, the removal of the 500-foot4reeway buffer from AB 2011 eligibility criteria and development standards by AB 2243 will result in a number of sites that were previously not eligible for AB 2011 streamline, ministerial approval and, thus, not contemplated, analyzed or included in NS-3045 or NS-3047 (Ordinances) to now qualify for AB 2011 streamlining unless the exempt parcels lists included in the Ordinances are amended; and WHEREAS, AB 2011, as amended by AB 2243, will permit affordable housing in high -risk zones in close proximity to freeways and will result in potential conflicts with the General Plan Land Use Element and environmental justice policies aimed at avoiding the locating of sensitive receptors in close proximity to uses that pose a hazard to health; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan Land Use Element allows for residential development in certain parts of the City identified in its land use map with the appropriate infrastructure improvements required to sustain high -quality housing and residential communities, while maintaining and preserving existing neighborhoods, commercial districts and established land use patterns; and WHEREAS, AB 2011 permits a local government to exempt a parcel from these types of streamlined approval before a developer submits a development application on the parcel if: (1) the local government identifies one or more alternative sites for residential development that meet certain environmental criteria; (2) the local government has permitted the alternative parcels not otherwise eligible for development pursuant to AB 2011 to be developed pursuant to AB 2011 streamlining, and that the alternative parcels are suitable for residential development as defined in State housing element law; (3) the local government has permitted the alternative parcels that are subject to AB 2011 streamlining to be developed at densities above the residential density required in subdivision (b) of Section 65912.113 (100 percent affordable) or subdivision (b) of 65912.123 (Mixed -Income) of the Government Code; (4) the alternative development would result in no net loss of the total potential residential density in the jurisdiction; (5) the alternative development would result in no net loss of the potential residential density of housing affordable to lower income households in the jurisdiction; and (6) the alternative development would affirmatively further fair housing; and Ordinance No. NS-3075 Page 2 of 6 WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana had identified the parcels listed in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 to this ordinance as parcels exempt from streamlined review pursuant to Government Code sections 65912.114 or 65912.124 by adoption of Resolution No. 2023-037, Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3045 and Ordinance No. NS-3047; and WHEREAS, the parcels identified in Attachment 3 to this ordinance, as previously adopted and now updated, met all of the required environmental criteria as shown in environmental criteria analysis provided in Attachment 3; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has permitted the parcels listed in Attachment 3, 100 percent affordable and mixed -income, respectively, to this ordinance that are not otherwise eligible for development pursuant to AB 2011 streamlined review to be developed pursuant to the requirements of AB 2011; and WHEREAS, the parcels listed in Attachment 3 to this ordinance may be developed at the residential density required by AB 2011 or the residential density set forth in the City's General Plan, whichever is greater, as described in the site suitability analysis included in Attachment 3; and WHEREAS, exempting the parcels listed in the amended parcels list contained in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 to this ordinance will not result in a net loss of the total potential residential density in the jurisdiction because there is a surplus of residential capacity on the alternative parcels identified in Attachment 3 to offset the lost potential units on the exempt parcels whereby there will not be a net loss in the potential residential units permitted in the jurisdiction, as provided in the calculations found in Attachment 3; and WHEREAS, there will be no net loss of the potential residential density of housing affordable to lower income households in the jurisdiction because the parcels identified and listed in Attachment 3 allow density meeting or exceeding that required by Government Code Section 65583.2(c)(3) of 30 dwelling units per acre, the threshold established and deemed appropriate to accommodate housing for lower income households for jurisdictions in a metropolitan county and AB 2011 affordability criteria will apply to developments on the alternative sites; and WHEREAS, the City's local inclusionary housing ordinance, known as the Affordable Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO), will require eligible projects citywide to set aside units as affordable to lower and moderate -income households for at least 55 years as applicable by AB 2011; and WHEREAS, development of the alternative parcels eligible for AB 2011 streamlined review and listed in Attachment 3 will result in affirmatively furthering fair housing as described in the affirmatively furthering fair housing analysis included Attachment 3 to this ordinance; and WHEREAS, exempting the parcels in the amended parcels list contained in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 will prevent housing from being developed on sites that Ordinance No. NS-3075 Page 3 of 5 do not have the infrastructure needed to accommodate high -quality housing, will not comply with the land use plan and housing program that the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) certified Housing Element is based upon, and will locate sensitive receptors in close proximity to uses that pose a hazard to health, in direct conflict with environmental justice goals and policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana, based upon the written findings required for exemption under AB 2011 and set forth above, exempts the parcels listed in the amended parcels list contained in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 from the streamlined approval process for eligible projects provided by Government Code sections 65912.114 and 65912.124; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65912.114(o) and 65912.124(o), a local government may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of AB 2011, and an ordinance adopted to implement AB 2011 shall not be considered a '.project" under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above and all attachments to this ordinance are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. Under California Government Code sections 65912.114(o) and 65912.124(o), the adoption of an ordinance by a city implementing the provisions of AB 2011 is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Therefore, the proposed Ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA. Section 3. The City Council, based upon the written findings required for exemption under AB 2011, exempts the added parcels in the amended parcels list contained in Attachments 1 and 2 from the streamlined approval process for eligible projects provided by Government Code sections 65912.114 and 65912.124 and amends the list of parcels identified in Attachment 3. Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance No. NS-3075 Page 4 of 5 Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this 21st day of Januai APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney p Melissa Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers Amezcua, Bacerra, Hernandez, Lopez, Penaloza, Phan, Vazquez (7) NOES: Councilmembers None (0) ABSTAIN: Councilmembers None (0) ABSENT: Councilmembers None (0 Ili 4:40UtW1Am-[M1S-11%allI*3rlwerkW_nfZ67 7[ell �/_1WWO I, JENNIFER L. HALL, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-3075 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on January 21, 2025 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Ordinance No. NS-3075 Page 5 of 5 ATTACHMENT ;,,„-.ntiaL..,Rounded.. 002-163-18 207 W 18TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR AB 2011 30 AB 2011 Capacity ABYS Total Exempted to Remain Exempted Capacity AB 2011 ... 4 4.5 Rounded 0 4 002-163-19 1801 N BROADWAY 0.4 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 12.0 0 12 12 002-163-28 1815 N BROADWAY 0.08 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 2.4 0 2 2 002-163-29 1819 N BROADWAY 0.08 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 2.4 0 2 2 002-164-08 202 W 18TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 002-164-09 206 W 18TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-164-10 1717 N BROADWAY 0.21 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.3 0 6 6 002-164-11 1711 N BROADWAY 0.21 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.3 0 6 6 002-164-23 1718 N MAIN ST 0.3 Cl-MD GC 0.5 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 002-164-29 1702 W MAIN ST 0.47 Cl-MD GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.1 0 14 14 002-203-17 2670 N MAIN ST 1.44 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 43.2 0 43 43 002-203-22 2660 N MAIN ST 0.76 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 22.8 0 22 22 003-141-31 1705 N BUSH ST 0.54 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 16.2 0 16 16 003-143-32 1701 N MAIN ST 0.88 Cl-MD GC 0.5 FAR 30 26.4 0 26 26 005-110-02 402 W 17TH ST 2.68 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 80.4 0 80 80 005-111-54 526 W 17TH ST 0.23 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.9 0 6 6 005-111-55 500 W 17TH ST 0.21 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.3 0 6 6 005-111-56 502 W 17TH ST 0.22 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 0 6 6 005-111-57 512 W 17TH ST 0.22 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 0 1 6 6 005-111-58 516 W 17TH ST 0.22 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 0 6 6 005-111-62 520 W 17TH ST 0.43 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.9 0 12 12 005-142-01 849 N GARNSEY ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-142-02 843 N GARNSEY ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-142-17 848 N PARTON ST 0.16 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 005-142-18 842 N PARTON ST 0.33 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 9.9 0 9 9 2-1 -'2 838 N PARTON ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 00-1-142-20 836 N PARTON ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 S.1 0 5 5 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 005-142-21 830 N PARTON ST 0.09 P At 0.5 FAR AB 2011 Base,. A62011 Potential Capacity AB 2011 Total Exempted to Remain Exempted Capacity AB 2011 Ca paClty Rounded. Rounded 30 2.7 0 2 2 005-142-30 822 N PARTON ST 0.32 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 9.6 0 9 9 005-142-31 8SO N PARTON ST 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 005-143-01 853 N PARTON ST 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 005-143-02 618 W 10TH ST 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 005-143-03 843 N PARTON ST 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 005-143-04 839 N PARTON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-05 835 N PARTON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-06 833 1 N PARTON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-07 829 N PARTON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-08 825 N PARTON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-10 817 N PARTON ST 0.31 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 9.3 0 9 9 005-143-15 850 N VAN NESS AVE 0.19 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.7 0 5 5 005-143-16 846 N VAN NESS AVE 0.21 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.3 0 6 6 005-143-17 844 N VAN NESS AVE 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-18 838 N VAN NESS AVE 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 OOS-143-19 838 N PATRON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-20 836 N PATRON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-21 830 N PATRON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-28 814 N VAN NESS AVE 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-29 823 N PARTON ST 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-143-32 615 W CIVIC CENTER DR 0.34 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 10.2 0 10 10 005-143-33 611 W CIVIC CENTER DR 0.3 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 005-143-34 822 N VAN NESS AVE 0.3 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 005-143-35 601 W CIVIC CENTER DR 0.35 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 10.S 0 10 10 -144-01 849 N VAN NESS AVE 0.2 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6-144-OS t 833 N VAN NESS AVE 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT - 002-161-07 2009 N BROADWAY 0.24 P ,,;". PAO-1 ;•:• .... 1.0 FAR AB 2011 30 AB 2011 Capacity AB 20fii -•. ;•a;: ._ Total Exempted to Remain Rounded. Exempted Capacity AB 2011 7 7.2 :Rounded 0 7 002-161-08 2003 N BROADWAY 0.24 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 7.2 0 7 7 002-161-11 207 W 20TH ST 0.16 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 002-161-15 2025 N BROADWAY 0.47 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 14.1 0 14 14 002-162-07 116 W 20TH ST 0.17 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 002-162-08 120 W 20TH ST 0.19 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 5.7 0 5 5 002-162-11 210 W 20TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-162-15 119 W 19TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 002-162-16 125 W 19TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 002-162-17 201 W 19TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 002-162-18 207 W 19TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 002-162-22 1919 N BROADWAY 0.18 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 5.4 1 0 1 5 5 002-162-27 1911 N BROADWAY 0.3 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 002-162-28 206 W 20TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-162-29 202 W 20TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-162-34 115 W 19TH 5T 0.17 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 002-162-35 1901 N BROADWAY 0.27 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 8.1 0 8 8 002-163-06 118 W 19TH ST 0.23 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.9 0 6 6 002-163-07 122 W 19TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-163-08 202 W 19TH 5T 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-163-09 206 W 19TH 5T 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 1 4 4 002-163-10 210 W 19TH 5T 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-163-11 214 W 19TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-163-14 113 W 18TH ST 0.12 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 002-163-15 117 W 18TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-163-16 121 W 18TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-263-17 203 W 18TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 1 30 1 4.5 0 4 4 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT AB 2011 as Amended by AB 2243 - 100 Percent Affordable Exempt Parcels List Parcel additions are underlined Parcel removals are •'-�...l.ethMugh � ' 0.11 C1 GC 0.5 FAR AB 2011 Base - 30 ..: AB 2011 Potential 3.3 _... to Remain .. ......_ -T.Ti Exempted Exem Capacity AB 2'� Rounded Gay 3.0 3 Rounded 0 002-092-07 1710 N GREENLEAF ST 002-094-24 817 W 17TH ST 0.18 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 5.4 0 5 5 002-094-25 807 W 17TH ST 0.11 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.3 0 3 3 002-094-29 703 W 17TH ST 0.3 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 002-094-30 711 W 17TH ST 0.2 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 002-094-32 801 W 17TH ST 0.13 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 002-151-03 2014 N BROADWAY 0.3 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 002-151-04 2006 N BROADWAY 0.23 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.9 0 6 6 002-151-05 2002 N BROADWAY 0.47 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 14.1 0 14 14 002-151-06 1922 N BROADWAY 0.27 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 8.1 0 8 8 002-151-09 1906 N BROADWAY 0.2 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 002-151-10 1902 N BROADWAY 0.22 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.6 0 6 6 002-151-17 315 W 19TH ST 0.15 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 002-151-25 1912 N BROADWAY 0.41 P 1.0 FAR 30 12.3 0 12 12 002-151-27 2020 N BROADWAY 0.62 P -1 1.0 FAR 30 18.6 0 18 A 002-152-01 1816 N BROADWAY 0.26 P rPAO-1 -1 1.0 FAR 30 7.8 0 7 7 002-152-02 1810 N BROADWAY 0.17 P -1 1.0 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 002-152-03 1806 N BROADWAY 0.18 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 5.4 0 5 5 002-152-20 1800 N BROADWAY 0.38 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 11.4 0 11 11 002-153-21 339 W 17TH ST 0.12 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 002-153-22 335 W 17TH ST 0.12 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 002-153-25 0.11 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.3 0 3 3 002-153-26 333 W 17TH ST 0.06 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 1.8 0 1 1 002-161-06 2015 N BROADWAY 0.41 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 12.3 0 12 12 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT I 005-144-06 T!Wpacity i 929 N VAN NESS AVE 0.14 P PAO AB 2011 - Base AB 2011 AB2011 Total Exempted, to Remain Exempted CapacitV AIR 20, CaDa Potential Rounded Rounded 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 0 05-144-07 825 IN VAN NESS AVE 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 005-144-29 501 W CIVICCENTER DR 0.3 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 005-144-33 856 IN ROSS ST 0.9 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 27.0 0 27 27 005-144-34 840 IN ROSS ST 0.3 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 005-181-01 444 W TENTH I ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-181-06 825 N ROSS ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-181-09 811 N ROSS ST 011 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 005-181-10 809 N ROSS ST 0.1 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 005-181-26 801 N ROSS ST 0.27 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 8.1 0 8 8 005-181-30 423 W CIVIC CENTER DR 0.15 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 005-181-37 840 IN BIRCH ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-181-38 844 IN BIRCH ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-181-39 848 IN BIRCH ST 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 005-181-40 821 N ROSS ST 0.2 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 005-181-41 813 N ROSS ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-181-42 433 W CIVIC CENTER DR 0.34 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 10.2 0 10 10 005-181-43 445 W CIVIC CENTER 3.25 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 97.5 0 97 97 005-181-49 401 W CIVIC CENTER DR 1.02 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 30.6 0 30 30 016-082-35 534 E CENTRAL AVE 0.17 Cl LR-7 7 du/ac 30 5.1 1 5 4 016-082-36 538 E CENTRAL AVE 0.17 Cl LR-7 7 du/ac 30 5.1 1 5 4 016-134-39 607 E CENTRAL AVE 0.17 Cl UR-7 7 du/ac 30 5.1 1 5 4 016-135-34 608 E CENTRAL AVE 0.17 Cl LR-7 7 du/ac 30 5.1 1 5 4 099-212-50 600 N EUCLID ST 0.13 C2 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 3.9 0 3 3 099-213-53 502 N EUCLID ST 0.15 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 099-221-22 414 N EUCLID ST 0.24 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 2 Z:9 0 7 099-221-27 N EUCLID ST 0.23 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 6 0 6 6 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 1 0.11 Cl GC t 0.5 FAR AB 2011 Base ...Potential De 30 AB 2011 Capacity to Remain Rounded AB 2011 Exempted t otal Exempted C .Y AB 2011 3 Rounded 3.3 0 3 099-221-28 402 N EUCLID ST 099-222-39 306 N EUCLID ST 0.57 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.1 0 17 17 099-223-26 202 N EUCLID ST 0.61 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 18.3 0 18 18 099-224-40 122 N EUCLID ST 0.1 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 099-224-41 118 N EUCLID ST 0.11 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.3 0 3 3 099-232-39 5401 W 1ST ST 0.56 C1, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 30 16.8 0 16 16 099-232-41 5423 W 1ST ST 0.36 C1, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 30 10.8 0 10 10 099-232-43 5425 W 1ST ST 0.45 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 13.5 0 13 13 099-232-47 5421 W 1ST ST 0.27 Cl, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 30 8.1 0 8 8 099-233-23 102 N COOPER ST 0.2 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 099-233-24 106 N COOPER ST 0.2 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 099-233-25 110 N COOPER ST 0.2 C1 1-R-7 7 du/ac 30 6.0 1 6 5 100-291-01 413 N EUCLID ST 0.57 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.1 0 17 17 100-291-02 405 N EUCLID ST 0.21 C1 LMR-11 11 du/ac 30 6.3 2 6 4 101-131-08 1714 N SYDNEY ST 0.17 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 108-381-25 5111 W EDINGER AVE 5.69 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 170.7 0 170 170 109-071-11 1400 W MCFADDEN AVE 0.68 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 20.4 0 20 20 109-071-12 1414 W MCFADDEN AVE 0.71 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 21.3 0 21 21 109-071-13 1150 S BRISTOL ST 0.62 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 18.6 0 18 18 109-071-15 1204 S BRISTOL ST 0.82 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.6 0 24 24 109-071-16 1180 S BRISTOL ST 0.48 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.4 0 14 14 109-071-18 1136 S BRISTOL ST 0.96 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 28.8 0 28 28 109-071-19 1212 S BRISTOL ST 1.91 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 57.3 0 57 57 232-051-11 1231 W MEMORY LN 0.94 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 28.2 0 28 28 232-051-12 2735 N BRISTOL ST 4.55 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 136.5 0 136 136 396-031-16 1703 E 17TH ST 0.89 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 26.7 0 26 26 396-031-31 1778 N SHERRY LN 3.28 C5, Rl I 1-R-7 7 du/ac 30 98.4 22 1 98 76 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 396-031-32 a: . ......, . - 1801 E 17TH ST ... tot$ize 0.89 Zo ._., C5 ,..-., .. _..: 111 GC .. �,...;,.•. r.. ._ - _ ... --... -:.,.. 0.5 FAR _ .. AR 2011 Base � sit 30 AB 2011 Capacity to Remain Rounded AB 2011 Total Exempted Exempted Capacity AB 2011 Capacity. ._.. 26 Potential Rounded . LL 26.7 0 26 396-031-34 1737 E 17TH ST 0.74 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 22.2 0 22 22 396-031-35 1727 E 17TH ST 0.59 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.7 0 17 17 396-033-02 1631 E 18TH ST 0.46 C5, RI LR-7 7 du/ac 30 13.8 3 13 10 396-034-02 1631 E 17TH ST 1.06 C5 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 31.8 0 31 31 396-065-15 1621 E 17TH ST 0.25 C5, R1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 7.5 1 7 6 396-065-16 1625 E 18TH ST 0.33 C5, R1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 9.9 2 9 7 396-065-20 0.98 C5, R1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 29.4 6 29 23 396-065-25 1605 1 E 17TH ST 1.5 C5, Rl LR-7 1 7 du/ac 30 45.0 1 10 45 35 396-066-01 1625 E 17TH ST 0.39 C5 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 11.7 0 11 11 396-066-02 1621 E 17TH ST 0.39 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 11.7 0 11 11 396-066-06 1535 E 17TH ST 0.35 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 10.5 0 10 10 396-066-07 0.34 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 10.2 0 10 10 396-066-08 0.2 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 396-066-09 1525 E 17TH ST 0.21 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.3 0 6 6 396-066-10 1505 E 17TH ST 0.4 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 12.0 0 12 12 396-066-11 1505 E 17TH ST 0.38 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 11.4 0 11 11 396-066-14 1611 E 17TH ST 0.12 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 396-066-15 1615 E 17TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 396-066-16 1605 E 17TH ST 0.1 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 396-066-17 1595 E 17TH ST 0.1 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 396-066-18 1585 E 17TH ST 0.12 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 396-066-19 1625 E 17TH ST 1.05 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 31.5 0 31 31 396-066-21 1575 E 17TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 396-091-26 1001 E 17TH ST 0.62 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 18.6 0 18 18 396-131-27 2429 N TUSTIN AVE 1.2 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 36.0 0 36 36 396-141-01 2301 N TUSTIN AVE 0.51 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 15.3 0 15 15 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 396-141-07 2151 E E SANTA CLARA AVE 0.35 C5 GC 0.5 FAR AB 2011 Base 30 AB 2011 Potential ...__.. ... Exempted Total Exempted AB 2011 - .Capacity 10 to Remain Rounded Ca a �- -Y Rounded _ 10 10.5 0 396-141-09 2401 N TUSTIN AVE 0.96 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 28.8 0 28 28 396-141-13 2343 N TUSTIN AVE 1.04 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 31.2 0 31 31 396-141-14 2323 N TUSTIN AVE 1.08 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 32.4 0 32 32 396-221-37 1415 E 17TH ST 0.57 P, RI PAC-1 1.0 FAR 30 17.1 0 17 17 396-221-60 1441 E 17TH ST 0.55 P, R1 PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 16.5 0 16 16 396-221-61 1421 E 17TH ST 0.56 P, R1 PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 16.8 0 16 16 396-261-30 2360 N TUSTIN AVE 0.29 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 8.7 0 8 8 396-261-31 0.29 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 8.7 0 8 8 396-261-32 0.03 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 0.9 0 0 0 396-261-33 2360 N TUSTIN AVE 1.97 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 59.1 0 59 59 396-261-34 2370 N TUSTIN AVE 1.18 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 35.4 0 1 35 35 396-261-35 0.05 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 1.5 0 1 1 396-261-36 2300 N TUSTIN AVE 0.66 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 19.8 0 19 19 396-261-56 2414 N TUSTIN AVE 12.43 P, R4 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 372.9 87 372 285 396-281-49 2231 N TUSTIN AVE 1.3 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 39.0 0 39 39 396-281-50 2201 N TUSTIN AVE 0.97 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 29.1 0 29 29 396-281-51 2121 N TUSTIN AVE 0.48 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.4 0 14 14 396-301-02 1921 N TUSTIN AVE 0.55 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 16.5 0 16 16 396-301-05 1931 N TUSTIN AVE 0.29 C1 GC. 0.5 FAR 30 0 8 8 396-302-01 1901 N TUSTIN AVE 0.68 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 0 20 20 396-302-02 1829 N TUSTIN AVE 0.52 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 0 15 15 396-302-03 1819 N TUSTIN AVE 0.72 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 0 21 21 396-321-11 1800 N OLOTUSTIN AVE 2.31 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 P69.3 0 69 69 396-321-13 2107 E 17TH ST 0.84 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 0 25 25 396-321-17 2127 E 17TH ST 1.08 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 0 32 32 396-332-02 1816 OLOTUSTIN AVE 0.16 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 0 4 4 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 396-332-07 2050 N TUSTIN AVE 0.15 C5 GC 0.5 FAR AS 2011 Base, 30 AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 Total _ Exempted to Remain Rounded Exempted Capacity AB 2011 Potential Rounded - 4.5 Down Dow 0 4 4 396-332-08 2030 N TUSTIN AVE 0.13 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 396-332-09 2010 N TUSTIN AVE 0.15 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 396-332-10 2020 N TUSTIN AVE 0.2 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 396-332-11 2040 N TUSTIN AVE 0.14 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 396-332-12 2060 N TUSTIN AVE 0.1 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 396-332-13 2080 N TUSTIN AVE 0.14 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 396-332-14 1970 OLDTUSTIN AVE 0.22 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 0 6 6 396-332-15 1950 TUSTIN AVE 0.15 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 396-332-16 1930 OLD TUSTIN AVE 0.13 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 396-332-17 1910 TUSTIN AVE 0.15 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 396-332-18 1920 N TUSTIN ST 0.2 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 396-332-19 1940 N OLD TUSTIN AVE 0.14 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 396-332-20 1960 TUSTIN AVE 0.1 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 396-332-21 1980 TUSTIN AVE 0.14 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 396-333-01 1828 N TUSTIN AVE 0.79 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 23.7 0 23 23 396-333-02 1810 OLD TUSTIN AVE 0.16 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 396-3S2-12 1823 E 17TH ST 0.81 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.3 0 24 24 396-352-13 1833 E 17TH ST 0.78 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 23.4 0 23 23 396-352-14 1905 E 17TH ST 0.78 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 23.4 0 23 23 396-352-16 1913 E 17TH ST 1.5 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 45.0 0 45 45 398-122-12 210 E 17TH ST 0.25 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 7.5 0 7 7 398-392-16 1503 E 4TH ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 398-392-17 1507 E 4TH ST 0.1 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 398-392-18 1513 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 398-392-19 1517 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 398-393-14 1527 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 1533 E 4TH ST 0.16 P PAO - 0.5 FAR ;ABExemptd ;2011 Capacitv AB 2011 Total to Remain Exempted Capacitv AB 2011 Got398-393-15 4 Rounded Rounded 11- 0 4 398-393-16 1539 E 4TH ST 0.16 P PAO 0.5 FAR 0 4 4 398-393-17 1541 E 4TH ST 0.16 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 1 0 1 4 4 398-393-18 414 N EASTSIDE AVE 0.14 P LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 398-401-22 1651 E 4TH ST 2.16 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 64.8 0 64 64 398-401-23 1633 E 4TH ST 1.28 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 38.4 0 38 38 398-401-24 1617 E 4TH ST 0.6 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 18.0 0 18 18 398-401-25 1611 E 4TH ST 0.58 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 17.4 0 17 17 398-401-26 1605 E 4TH ST 0.24 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.2 0 7 7 398-411-01 1604 E 4TH ST 0.55 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 16.5 0 16 16 398-411-02 1608 E 4TH ST 0.47 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 14.1 0 14 14 398-431-02 1532 E 4TH ST 0.26 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.8 0 7 7 398-431-03 1526 E 4TH ST 0.25 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.5 0 7 7 398-431-32 1522 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 398-431-33 1518 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 398-431-34 1514 E 4TH ST 0.22 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 0 6 6 398-431-35 1600 E 4TH ST 0.47 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 14.1 0 14 14 398-441-01 323 N LINWOOD AVE 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 398-441-14 324 N LINWOOD AVE 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 398-441-15 1414 E 4TH ST 0.25 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.5 0 7 7 398-441-16 1410 E 4TH ST 0.24 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.2 0 7 7 398-441-18 311 N MCCLAY ST 0.2 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 398-441-35 1400 E 4TH ST 0.34 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 10.2 0 10 10 398-534-05 1204 N ROSS ST 0.19 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.7 0 5 5 398-534-06 1210 N R055 ST 0.22 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 0 6 6 398-534-07 1212 N ROSS ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 398-534-08 502 W WASHINGTON AVE 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT - - .�� 1002 N ROSS ST -. .�::. 0.18 .:_. P �.:.•�.:-- PAO .:-.- nsit : 0.5 FAR AS 2011 ,Base ,�.• 30 AS 2011 -Capacity AB2011 Total Exempt -- AS 2-- 5 to - Remain Exempted d Capacity Potential.~,` Rounded .Rounded 5.4 _.Dowf�. 0 5 398-535-06 398-535-07 1008 N ROSS ST 0.2 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 398-535-08 1014 N ROSS ST 0.19 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.7 0 5 5 398-535-09 1020 N ROSS ST 0.19 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.7 0 5 5 398-535-10 1024 N ROSS ST 0.25 P, R2 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.5 0 7 7 398-535-11 1032 N ROSS ST 0.25 P, R2 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.5 0 7 7 398-541-01 1225 N ROSS ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 398-541-02 424 W WASHINGTON AVE 0.1 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 398-541-03 422 W WASHINGTON AVE 0.12 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 398-541-04 1223 N ROSS ST 0.36 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 10.8 0 10 10 398-541-05 416 W WASHINGTON AVE 0.12 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 398-541-06 1221 N ROSS ST 0.12 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 398-541-25 1205 N ROSS ST 0.46 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 13.8 0 13 13 398-551-01 1021 N ROSS ST 0.08 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 2.4 0 2 2 398-551-02 412 HALESWORTH ST 0.05 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 1.5 0 1 1 398-551-03 1019 N ROSS ST 0.08 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 2.4 0 2 2 398-551-04 1017 N ROSS ST 0.09 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 2.7 0 2 2 398-551-05 1013 N ROSS ST 0.23 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.9 0 6 6 398-551-06 1009 N ROSS ST 0.18 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.4 0 5 5 398-551-08 1001 N ROSS ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 399-052-08 901 W 17TH ST 0.35 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 10.5 0 10 10 399-052-09 917 W 17TH ST 0.16 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 399-052-10 1707 N OLIVE ST 0.17 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 399-053-14 1005 W 17TH ST 0.15 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 399-053-15 1706 N OLIVE ST 0.14 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 399-064-10 1077 W 17TH ST 0.34 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 10.2 0 10 10 399-064-11 1071 W 17TH ST 0.97 Cl PAO 0.5 FAR 30 29.1 0 29 29 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 399-064-12 ",- 2330 W 1ST ST 0.18 PAO 0.5 FAR AB 2011 Base.. ..Potential AB 2011 Capacity AS 2011 Total Exernpjgt6 to - Remain Exempted CapadtV I AB 20... 5 Rounded Rounded C1 30 5.4 0 5 399-065-18 1103 W 17TH ST 0.18 Ci PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.4 0 5 5 399-065-19 1109 W 17TH ST 0.16 Cl PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 399-071-16 1117 W 17TH ST 0.3 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 9.0 0 9 9 399-071-17 1121 W 17TH ST 0.16 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 399-072-16 1133 W 17TH ST 0.35 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 10.5 0 10 10 399-072-17 1139 W 17TH ST 0.17 Cl PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 399-072-18 1145 W 17TH ST 0.11 Cl PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.3 0 3 3 399-072-19 1151 W 17TH ST 0.11 Ci PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.3 0 3 3 399-085-16 1223 W 17TH ST 0.67 Cl, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 30 20.1 0 20 20 399-085-17 1205 W 17TH ST 0.91 C1, RI GC 0.5 FAR 30 27.3 0 27 27 399-085-18 1225 W 17TH ST 0.45 C1, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 30 13.5 0 13 13 399-085-19 1227 W 17TH ST 0.42 Cl, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.6 0 12 12 399-085-21 1715 N BRISTOL ST 1.1 Cl, R2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 33.0 0 33 33 399-101-09 2215 N BROADWAY 0.57 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 17.1 0 17 17 399-101-10 207 W BUFFALO AVE 0.16 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 399-101-11 2203 N BROADWAY 0.39 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 11.7 0 11 11 399-101-12 2223 N BROADWAY 1.43 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 42.9 0 42 42 399-102-10 2037 N BROADWAY 0.62 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 18.6 0 18 18 399-102-11 2043 N BROADWAY 0.61 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 18.3 0 18 18 399-102-12 2103 N BROADWAY 0.49 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 14.7 0 14 14 399-102-24 2107 N BROADWAY 1.32 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 39.6 0 39 39 399-102-26 2115 N BROADWAY 1.85 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 55.5 0 55 55 399-111-01 2232 N BROADWAY 0.26 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 7.8 0 7 7 399-111-02 2230 N BROADWAY 0.35 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 10.5 0 10 10 399-111-03 2200 N I BROADWAY 1.12 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 33.6 0 33 33 399-111-04 1 2122 1 N BROADWAY 1.02 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 30.6 0 30 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 399-111-05 - - 2114 N BROADWAY 0.33 P ..., PAO-1 .. ...,:y 1.0 FAR AB 2011 Base 30 AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 Total Exempted to Remain Rounded Capacity Cxem t AB 2 Rounded r - Ca 9 9 Potential. .,..:. 9.9 . 0 399-111-06 2112 N BROADWAY 0.28 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 8.4 0 8 8 399-111-08 2100 N BROADWAY 0.83 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 24.9 0 24 24 399-111-09 2040 N BROADWAY 0.48 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 14.4 0 14 14 399-111-10 2032 N BROADWAY 0.44 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 13.2 0 13 13 399-111-26 2106 N BROADWAY 0.32 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 9.6 0 9 9 399-121-01 1725 W 17TH ST 9.13 C1, P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 273.9 0 273 273 399-121-02 1901 N COLLEGE AVE 4.23 C2 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 126.9 0 126 126 399-121-03 1725 N COLLEGE AVE 4.28 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 128.4 0 128 128 399-121-16 1830 N BRISTOL ST 0.7 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 21.0 0 21 21 399-121-17 1810 N BRISTOL ST 0.66 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 19.8 0 19 19 399-121-18 1702 N BRISTOL ST 1.25 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 37.5 0 37 37 399-121-24 1535 W 17TH ST 10.54 C2 INS n/a 30 316.2 0 1 316 316 399-121-31 1311 W 17TH ST 6.5 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 195.0 0 195 195 399-121-33 1441 W 17TH ST 7.69 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 230.7 0 230 230 399-121-37 1421 W 17TH ST 1.28 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 38.4 0 38 38 399-121-38 1601 W 17TH ST 1.66 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 49.8 0 49 49 399-121-39 1545 W 17TH ST 1.8 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 54.0 0 54 54 399-121-40 1523 W 17TH ST 2.66 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 79.8 0 79 79 399-121-41 1501 W 17TH ST 0.65 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 19.5 0 19 19 399-121-42 1313 W 17TH ST 0.72 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 21.6 0 21 21 400-011-01 1950 E 17TH ST 0.8 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.0 0 24 24 400-011-02 1940 E 17TH ST 0.4 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.0 0 12 12 400-011-03 1920 E 17TH ST 0.78 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 23.4 0 23 23 400-011-14 1900 E 17TH 5T 0.62 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 18.6 0 18 18 400-011-18 1840 E 17TH ST 0.5 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 15.0 0 15 15 400-011-23 1850 E 17TH ST 0.45 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 13.5 0 13 13 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 400-011-25 1800 E 17TH ST 1.99 C5, Rl GC -� ' ....--.�.,--. 0.5 FAR AB 2011 Base. AB 2011 Potential Capacity AB 2011 Total Exem to -- AB 2, _� 59 to Remain Exempted Capacity Rounded Rounded . 30 59.7 0 59 400-012-03 1702 E 17TH ST 0.8 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.0 0 24 24 400-012-04 1750 17TH ST 0.8 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.0 0 24 24 400-012-05 1710 E 17TH ST 6.34 C5, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 30 190.2 0 190 190 400-013-05 0.37 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 11.1 0 11 11 400-013-06 0.39 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 11.7 0 11 11 400-013-07 0.75 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 22.5 0 22 22 400-013-08 1950 W 16TH 5T 1.18 C5, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 30 35.4 0 35 35 400-013-09 1840 E 16TH ST 0.76 C5, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 30 22.8 0 22 22 400-121-06 2000 E 17TH ST 5.72 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 171.6 0 171 171 400-121-07 2100 E 17TH ST 0.76 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 22.8 0 22 22 400-121-08 2130 E 17TH ST 0.98 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 29.4 0 29 29 400-121-09 2250 E 17TH ST 1.40 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 42.0 0 42 42 400-121-10 2262 E 17TH ST 9.44 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 283.2 0 283 283 400-131-03 1450 N TUSTIN I AVE 2.22 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 66.6 0 66 66 400-131-04 1350 N TUSTIN AVE 1.58 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 47.4 0 47 47 400-151-06 1100 N TUSTIN AVE 0.68 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 20.4 0 20 20 400-152-02 1200 N TUSTIN AVE 2.72 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 81.6 0 81 81 400-152-03 2223 WELLINGTON AVE 2.85 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 85.5 0 85 85 400-202-02 700 N TUSTIN AVE 1.18 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 35.4 0 35 35 400-202-03 801 N TUSTIN AVE 1.72 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 51.6 0 51 51 400-202-04 640 N TUSTIN AVE 1.36 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 40.8 0 40 40 400-202-06 825 PARK CENTER DR 1.49 P PAC-1 1.0 FAR 30 44.7 0 44 44 400-202-07 801 PARK CENTER DR 1.49 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 44.7 0 44 44 400-202-08 701 PARK CENTER DR 1.28 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 38.4 0 38 38 400-202-10 720 N TUSTIN AVE 1.27 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 35.1 0 38 38 400-202-11 2200 E FRUIT ST 1.45 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 43.5 0 43 43 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 400-231-03 1301 E 15TH ST 0.17 C5 GC 0.5 FAR AB zoxx Base Kamm 30 AB zoxl Capacity A62011 , Total Exen, Z t. AB z AB C to Remain Exempted Capacity Potential Rounded Rounded Units Down 5.1 0 5 5 400-231-04 1305 E 15TH ST 0.15 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 400-231-05 1309 E 15TH ST 0.15 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 400-232-12 1310 E 15TH ST 0.15 C5 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.5 1 4 3 400-232-13 1306 E 15TH ST 0.15 C5 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.5 1 4 3 400-232-14 1302 E 15TH ST 0.16 C5 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.8 1 4 3 400-242-01 1440 E 17TH ST 0.31 C5, RI GC 0.5 FAR 30 9.3 0 9 9 400-242-02 1450 E 17TH ST 0.96 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 28.8 0 28 28 400-251-01 1640 E 17TH ST 0.22 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 0 6 6 400-251-02 0.1 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.0 0 3 3 400-251-03 1638 E 17TH ST 0.49 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.7 0 14 14 400-251-04 1620 E 17TH ST 0.58 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.4 0 17 17 400-251-05 1618 E 17TH ST 0.49 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.7 0 14 14 400-251-06 1616 E 17TH ST 0.73 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 21.9 0 21 21 400-251-07 1570 E 17TH ST 0.73 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 21.9 0 21 21 405-055-05 1622 W 6TH ST 1.72 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 51.6 12 51 39 405-055-10 1515 W 5TH ST 0.14 Cl LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-11 1521 W 5TH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-12 1525 W 5TH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-13 1527 W STH ST 0.14 Cl LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-14 1531 W 5TH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-15 1601 W 5TH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-16 1605 W 5TH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-17 1609 W 5TH ST 0.13 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 3.9 0 3 3 405-055-19 1627 W 5TH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-20 1631 W STH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-055-21 507 N WESTERN AVE 0.05 C1 LR-7 7du/ac 30 1.5 0 1 1 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT ,. Cl LR-7 7 du/ac AB 2011 Base 30 AB 2011 Poten, Potential Ca acit -,. - Exem ted AB 20 a 3 to Remain Rounded Exempted Capacity Rounded 3.0 0 3 405-055-22 1635 W STH ST 0.1 405-061-05 1505 W STH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-061-06 1511 W STH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-065-28 1400 W STH ST 0.16 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.8 1 4 3 405-065-29 1411 W STH ST 0.11 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 3.3 0 3 3 405-065-32 1421 W STH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-065-33 1425 W STH ST 0.14 C1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-065-35 509 N PACIFIC AVE 0.06 C1 LR-7 7du/ac 30 1.8 0 1 1 405-251-01 1200 W 17TH ST 0.36 Cl I PAO 0.5 FAR 30 10.8 0 10 10 405-251-02 1212 W 17TH ST 0.83 C1, R1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 24.9 0 24 24 405-311-01 1142 W 17TH ST 0.12 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 405-311-02 1621 N BAKER ST 0.14 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-311-23 1618 N ROSEWOOD AVE 0.14 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 405-311-24 1138 W 17TH ST 0.12 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 405-312-01 1621 N ROSEWOOD AVE 0.16 CS PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 405-312-02 1617 N ROSEWOOD AVE 0.18 C1, R1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 5.4 1 5 4 405-312-29 1120 W 17TH ST 0.97 C1, RI I PAO 0.5 FAR 30 29.1 0 29 29 405-312-30 1108 W 17TH ST 0.71 C1, R1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 2.1.3 0 21 21 405-312-31 1104 W 17TH ST 0.2 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.0 0 6 6 405-312-32 1102 W 17TH ST 0.13 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 405-312-34 1060 W 17TH ST 0.43 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 12.9 0 12 12 405-312-53 1618 N FREEMAN ST 0.18 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.4 0 5 5 405-312-54 1048 W 17TH ST 0.15 C1 PAO 1 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 405-313-01 1046 W 17TH ST 0.15 Cl PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 405-313-02 1619 N FREEMAN ST 0.17 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 405-321-01 1010 W 17TH ST 4.10 C1, R1 LR-7 7 du/ac 30 123.0 28 122 94 405-321-02 900 W 17TH ST 2.81 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 84.3 0 1 84 84 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 408-041-01 2720 W EDINGER AVE 0.43 . s .,:.� Cl x. GC 0.5 FAR AB 2011 Base 30 AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 Total Exempted Capacity Exempted AB 2011 Rounded 12 12 to Remain Rounded Potential_ 12.9 0 408-041-02 2700 W EDINGER AVE 1.70 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 51.0 0 51 51 408-041-05 2600 W EDINGER AVE 0.07 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 2.1 0 1 2 2 408-261-12 1610 W EDINGER AVE 0.62 CS LR-7 7 du/ac 30 18.6 4 18 14 408-271-08 1512 W EDINGER AVE 1.08 1 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 1 32.4 0 32 32 408-273-01 1506 W EDINGER AVE 0.57 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.1 0 17 17 408-273-08 1350 W EDINGER AVE 6.38 C4 GC 0.5 FAR 30 191.4 0 191 191 408-273-11 1308 W EDINGER AVE 2.39 C4 GC 0.5 FAR 30 71.7 0 71 71 408-273-13 1300 W EDINGER AVE 0.27 C4 GC 0.5 FAR 30 8.1 0 8 8 408-273-14 1312 W EDINGER AVE 0.93 C4 GC 0.5 FAR 30 27.9 0 27 27 408-283-34 1622 S BRISTOL ST 2.65 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 79.5 0 79 79 408-471-14 1400 W SAINT GERTRUDE PL 0.62 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 18.6 0 18 18 408-471-15 2100 S BRISTOL ST 0.29 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 8.7 0 8 8 408-471-16 1431 W WARNER AVE 0.82 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.6 0 24 24 396-312-15 N TUSTIN AVE 0.56 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 16.9 0 16 16 408-471-18 2222 S BRISTOL ST 0.41 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.3 1 0 1 12 12 408-471-17 2120 S BRISTOL ST 10.06 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 301.9 0 301 301 003-010-35 2525 N MAIN ST 4.38 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 131.4 0 131 131 005-142-60 801 W CIVIC CENTER DR 3.61 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 108.3 0 108 108 005-144-31 830 N ROSS ST 0.43 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 12.9 0 12 12 005-144-32 821 N VAN NESS AVE 1.51 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 45.3 0 45 45 005-181-02 837 N ROSS ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-181-03 839 N ROSS ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-181-04 837 N ROSS ST 0.13 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 005-181-47 0.01 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 0.3 0 0 0 005-181-48 829 ROSS ST 0.11 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.3 0 3 3 396-311-25 1808 N TUSTIN AVE 1.63 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 48.9 0 48 1 48 Ordinance No. NS-3075 A TA HMENTI `t:5ize Zorn C2 _ GC ..�-s ...,.. � 0.5 FAR AB 2011 Base �... T ....... 30 AB 2011 Potential Capacity AB 2011 Exempted Total - Exempted to Remain Capacity qg 2011 Capacity -- Rounded Rounded 10.2 Down -.,... Down 396-311-28 1717 N OLDTUSTIN AVE 0.34 0 10 10 396-311-22 2205 E 17TH ST 0.68 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 20.4 0 20 20 396-311-24 1810 N TUSTIN AVE 0.42 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.6 0 12 12 396-311-27 2217 E 17TH ST 0.85 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 25.5 0 25 25 398-541-24 1215 N ROSS ST 0.21 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.3 0 6 6 398-541-26 1213 N ROSS ST 0.25 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.5 0 7 7 398-551-07 405 W SOTH ST 0.05 P, R2 MR-15 15 du/ac 30 1.5 0 1 1 398-551-09 405 W 10TH ST 0.29 P, R2 MR-15 15 du/ac 30 8.7 4 8 4 396-321-15 1975 E 17TH ST 4.44 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 133.2 0 133 133 396-321-16 1995 E 17TH ST 0.69 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 20.7 0 20 20 396-321-20 1935 E 17TH ST 0.59 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.7 0 17 17 396-321-21 1945 E 17TH ST 3.82 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 114.6 0 114 114 002-102-32 413 W 17TH ST 1.13 C1, R2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 33.9 0 33 33 002-102-18 1715 N ROSS ST 0.28 C1, R2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 8.4 0 8 8 002-164-07 122 W 18TH ST 0.11 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.3 0 3 3 002-164-28 123 W 17TH ST 0.32 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 9.6 0 9 9 002-164-06 120 W 18TH ST 0.14 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 002-164-22 114 W 18TH ST 0.14 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 002-164-25 111 W 17TH ST 0.12 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 002-104-44 503 W 17TH ST 0.32 Cl, R2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 9.6 0 9 9 002-104-45 511 W 17TH ST 0.41 Cl, R2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.3 0 12 12 002-180-35 2600 N MAIN ST 0.14 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 002-180-45 2333 N BROADWAY 2.49 C5 DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 74.7 0 74 74 002-180-46 2323 N MAIN ST 3.5 CS DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 105.0 0 105 105 002-203-23 2600 N MAIN ST 1.7 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 51.0 0 51 51 002-203-24 2600 N MAIN ST 0.58 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 17.4 0 17 17 003-113-04 2030 N I BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT S + - d 003-113-05 2026 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR AB 2011 Base 30 A82011 Capacity AB 2011 Total Exem a - A82-� A Ca to Remain Exempted Capacity Potential Rounded Rounded 4.8 0 4 4 003-113-06 2022 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 4.8 D 4 4 003-113-07 2016 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 003-113-08 2014 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 1 4 003-113-09 2010 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 4.3 0 4 4 003-113-10 2006 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 003-113-24 2045 N MAIN ST 0.15 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 4.4 0 4 4 003-113-28 2025 1 N MAIN ST 0.15 C3-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 003-113-30 2033 N MAIN ST 0.14 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 4.3 0 4 4 003-113-39 2041 N MAIN ST 0.29 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 8.6 0 8 8 003-113-40 2052 N BUSH ST 0.37 P DC-L.S 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 11.1 0 11 11 003-113-41 2056 N BUSH ST 0.15 C3-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 003-113-56 2105 N MAIN ST 0.24 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 7.1 0 7 7 003-113-59 2135 N MAIN ST 0.31 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 9.3 0 9 9 003-113-61 2058 N BUSH ST 0.14 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 003-141-18 1917 N BUSH ST 0.12 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 3.6 0 3 3 003-141-19 1909 N BUSH ST 0.17 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 5.1 0 5 5 003-141-22 1901 N BUSH ST 0.26 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 7.8 0 7 7 003-141-41 1905 N BUSH ST 0.33 P DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 9.9 0 9 9 003-153-27 309 E 17TH ST OAS Cl I GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 003-153-47 301 E 17TH ST 0.64 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 19.2 0 19 19 396-313-05 2401 E 17TH ST 0.31 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 9.2 0 9 9 398-083-10 1263 E 14TH ST 0.15 CS UN-20 20 du/ac, 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 3 4 1 398-083-11 1259 E 14TH ST 0.14 C5 UN-20 20 du/ac. 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 2 4 2 398-083-12 1255 E 14TH ST 0.14 C5 UN-20 20 du/ac, 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 2 4 2 398-084-03 1258 E 14TH ST 0.15 CS UN-20 20 du/ac, 1.0 FAR 30 4.5 3 4 1 398-084-06 1302 N GRAND AVE 0.35 C5 UN-20 20 du/ac. 1.0 FAR 30 10.5 7 10 3 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 1314 N GRAND AVE 0.58 C5 UN-20 '.' 20 du/ac. 1.0 FAR AB 2011 Base 30 4Potential Capacity A62011to Total Exempted Remain Rounded Exempted Capacity AB 2011 acit398-084-13 6 RoundedCa 11 17 398-084-17 1264 E 14TH ST 0.12 C5 UN-20 20 du/ac. 1.0 FAR 30 2 3 1 398-101-02 940 N GRAND AVE 0.55 SD84 DC-5 125 du/ac. 5.0 FAR 30 1 16.5 0 16 16 398-101-03 930 N GRAND AVE 0.31 SD84 DC-5 125 du/ac. 5.0 FAR 30 9.3 0 9 9 398-101-04 1205 E STAFFORD ST 0.36 SD84 DC-5 125 du/ac, 5.0 FAR 30 10.8 0 10 10 398-101-05 1201 E STAFFORD ST 0.18 SD84 DC-5 125 du/ac. 5.0 FAR 30 5.4 0 5 5 398-101-09 1214 E STAFFORD ST 0.18 SD84 DC-5 125 du/ac. 5.0 FAR 30 5.4 0 5 5 398-123-10 1614 N FRENCH ST 0.16 Cl LR-7 7 du ac 30 4.8 1 4 3 398-161-02 818 E 17TH ST 0.14 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 810 E 17TH ST 0.14 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 802 E 17TH ST 0.14 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 740 E 17TH ST 0.14 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 M 730 E 17TH ST 0.14 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 722 E 17TH ST 0.14 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 714 E ST 0.15 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 398-161-09 706 E ST 0.16 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 398-182-10 905 E AVE 0.09 SD84 UN-20 20 du/ac. 1.0 FAR 30 2.7 1 2 1 398-183-17 1312 N g17TH AVE 0.11 SD84 UN-20 20 du/ac. 1.0 FAR 30 3.3 2 3 1 398-401-21 1633 E ST 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.2 0 4 4 398-402-03 1665 E ST P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 26.4 0 26 26 398-402-06 421 N LYON ST !0.7 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 23.1 0 23 23 398-402-07 421 N LYON ST P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 0 3 3 399-101-01 2230 N MAIN ST Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 8.4 0 8 8 399-101-02 2222 N MAIN ST 0.33 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 9.9 0 9 9 399-101-03 2218 N MAIN ST 0.68 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 20.4 0 20 20 399-101-04 2212 N MAIN ST 0.36 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 10.8 0 10 10 399-101-05 2202 N MAIN ST 0.07 Cl-MD DC-1 5 90 du/ac. 1.SFAR 30 2.1 0 2 2 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 399-101-06 2208 N MAIN ST 0.28 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR AB 2011 Base.: 30 AB 203.1 Capacity AB 2011 Exempted Total Exempted-.-, to Remain Rounded Capaci4v AB 2 �- _., La 8 Potential 8.4 .Rounded 0 8 399-101-07 107 W BUFFALO AVE 0.16 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 4.8 0 4 4 399-101-08 119 W BUFFALO AVE 0.21 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 6.3 0 6 6 399-102-01 2132 N MAIN ST 0.62 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 18.6 0 18 18 399-102-02 2122 N MAIN ST 0.29 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 8.7 0 8 8 399-102-03 0.29 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 8.7 0 8 8 399-102-04 2112 N MAIN ST 0.34 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 10.2 0 10 10 399-102-22 112 W BUFFALO AVE 0.22 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 6.6 0 6 6 400-021-06 0.23 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.9 0 6 6 400-021-07 0.01 P 30 0.3 0 0 0 400-031-06 505 N TUSTIN AVE 2.23 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 66.9 0 66 66 400-031-07 431 N TUSTIN AVE 1.93 C2 GC-1 1.0 FAR 30 57.9 0 57 57 400-091-09 220 TUSTIN AVE 0.31 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 1 9.3 0 1 9 9 400-091-10 210 N TUSTIN AVE 0.31 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 9.3 0 9 9 400-091-11 200 N TUSTIN AVE 0.35 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 10.5 0 10 10 400-091-12 14951 N TUSTIN AVE 0.34 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 10.2 0 10 10 400-211-01 2302 E 17TH ST 0.48 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.4 0 14 14 400-211-08 2400 17TH ST 1.44 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 43.2 0 43 43 400-211-09 1601 N TUSTIN AVE 0.59 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.7 0 17 17 400-211-10 2314 E 17TH ST 0.99 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 29.7 0 29 29 400-232-15 1301 E 14TH ST 0.16 CS LR-7 7 du ac 30 4.8 1 4 3 400-232-16 1305 E 14TH ST 0.16 CS LR-7 7 du ac 30 4.8 1 4 3 400-232-17 1309 E 14TH ST 0.16 CS LR-7 7 du ac 30 4.8 1 4 3 400-261-14 1345 N GRAND AVE 0.66 CS UN-20 20 du/ac, 1.0 FAR 30 19.8 13 19 6 396-314-06 17221 E 17TH ST 0.27 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 8.2 0 8 8 396-313-11 2301 E 17TH ST 0.87 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 26.0 0 26 26 003-113-83 2129 N MAIN ST 0.03 C1-MD DC-1.-9 90 du/ac, 1.5 FAR 30 0.9 0 0 0 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHAIEN T � 003-113-86 2129 N MAIN STPO-A Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR AB 2011 Base 30 AB 2011 Potential Capacity AB 2011 Total Exempted AB 2011 32 to Remain Rounded Exempted Capacity Rounded 32.1 0 32 003-113-78 2129 N MAIN ST Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 0.6 0 0 0 003-113-63 2119 N MAIN ST Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 du/ac. 1.5 FAR 30 4.5 0 4 4 003-010-36 2515 N MAIN STE2.5 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 46.9 0 46 46 400-211-12 1551 N TUSTIN AVE P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 77.1 0 77 77 991 934 13 144- W 3-72FL SF C4 9R4 W. du{as 38 42 3 li 10 one 14� cncn 919 4 PLOWER ST 4-38 F RA9 9- -FAR 39 41 9 4l 41 691 E GiNTRfA6 AVE 0:04 91 M } .7-du/ae 39 3 9 ;2 3 2599 S HALLADAY ST 04 E4 kR7 7%u/ae 30 3 0 3 3 ''�, l 2031 ✓a SANTA GLARA AVE 4-.Q R 1N5 Aia 30 43 0 42 42 396 912 +3 1791 N TUSTIN ST 44 04 G9 9.5-FAR 39 36 9 36 36 296 van i4 1409 Al TUSTIN AVE 498 Q G6 9:5-F4R 39 33 9 32 .12 21:12 E SANTA Q ARAAVE &4E Ey GE 9.3-FAR 39 14 0 13 14 2230 0 TUSTIN AVE 9 51 05 GG 9.5-FAR 39 15 G 15 1E 2130 N TUSTIN AVE 2.1E f5 GG Q-&-� 30 65 0 64 64 R9C�0AI 09 210E M TUSTIN AVE 9§1 65 G0 0-5-PA4 39 1E 9 13 i3 4nn-z0.1 nn +mac R PAC)1 1-0-FAR 30 E4 0 38 59 Anne+ 91 1;4; A PAC) 1 1 Q PAR 30 43 0 42- 42 nnnAnn 101 04 2-32. R PA94 1:9.FAR 39 79 9 64 64 1494 N TUSTIN AVE &.35 F-R4 LR4 744- 30 251 58 259 142 An2Ann 201 !1 2999 6 19T ST 6 E2 PAC) -1 1:0 FAR 30 499 9 499 499 405 08 24 WQ,7 N ST 1.0E E4 GE 9A PAR 39 56 9 55 SE 495 09125 1223E yV OR 9-4 94 FAO 0.5 FAR 39 12 0 44 12 40508 26 12OR W GIVIG GWNTPR OR 07" R FAO GJA-A 30 44 0 44 34 AAA. 35 2727 Va EDINGER AVE 035 C4 G6 03-FAR 30 17 0 1E 46 An2� 43 P IQE S -AIRVIPAi ST 181 4947 G0 9-FAR 99 30 9 30 39 499-041-04 2E10 W SPING€R AVE 463 91 GE CIA PAR 39 19 0 49 18 Ordinance NO. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 'r 4'4" —�-' ' 3698 5 8:17 ,,,.. f4 . 66 0-5-FAR39 AB 2011 Base AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 Total Exempted to Remain Exempted Capacity AB 2011 aci Potential Rounded Rounded 6 DowR 9 4 4 412 '��--141 IN 1401 W MAfAR3111lR RI VD 037 C4 6E 03-PAR -39 34 B 44 -14 412 +�+ +non 1421 W MAfART-HUR PLVD 2-." E4 6E I 9-5— R 99 69 .=10,932 Ordinance No. NS-3075 City of Santa Ana AB 2011 100%Affordable Housing Act of 2022 '■ __ Amended Exempt Parcels - �u\ `• ! C ,CIMOQ[46 CP C-SM. ', v..•e } . _ . ¢-.'., . ' r r_ •echo _ so na ler[eyr eov<r"m<m a.r¢q i svxler[ o.anl - - - wzm�vm<n.:n zr.. arme.no�aiomna a"a % ' ere¢awavmmm, onmal - �9Nsea ror mobil, home o¢r4x .gym bvmecnorsama a"a _ - - - } •nno- a Nou:AM1 tl e' acm„M1 .ane eagonal la s¢[tens / 1 / —� ` �� r MaP le6end � _ •,4,. s e ■aietd. snamE.emµ - - 1 ATTACHMENTI ATTACHEMENT2 AB 2011 as Amended by AB 2243 - Mixed -Income Exempt Parcels List Parcel additions are underlined Parcel removals are StFllpethfflUgh 002-094-24 EIkd*�_.. .,... 817 W 17TH ST Lot Size ...._ 0.18 :.. C1 GP Land GP Density- AB 2011 Base ... ...... 80 AB 2011 to Remain Potei is a Units- Rounded -., 14 as Exemw AB 2011` .;,Ca pa city Potential Rounded . ,-:-nte. GC 0.5 sit a;; FAR ...:. 14.4 ,,�,.; _ ,,.- - 14 002-094-25 807 W 17TH ST 0.11 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 8.8 - 8 8 002-094-29 703 W 17TH ST 0.30 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 24.0 - 24 24 002-094-30 711 W 17TH ST 0.20 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 16.0 - 16 16 002-094-32 801 W 17TH ST 0.13 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 10.4 - 10 10 002-102-18 1715 N ROSS ST 0.28 C1,112 GC 0.5 FAR 80 22.4 - 22 22 002-102-32 413 W 17TH ST 1.13 C1,112 GC 0.5 FAR 80 90.4 - 90 90 002-104-44 503 W 17TH ST 0.32 C1,R2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 25.7 - 25 25 002-104-45 511 W 17TH ST 0.41 C1,R2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 32.7 - 32 32 002-151-03 2014 N BROADWAY 0.30 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 24.0 - 24 24 002-151-04 2006 N BROADWAY 0.23 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 18.4 - 18 18 002-151-05 2002 N BROADWAY 0.47 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 37.6 - 37 37 002-151-06 1922 N BROADWAY 0.27 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 21.6 - 21 21 002-151-09 1906 N BROADWAY 0.20 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 16.0 - 16 16 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 002-151-10 1902 N BROADWAY Lot 0.22 P PAO-1 ago- ., 1.0 FAR AB 2011 B ... 80 AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 Potential Units- Rounded Total Exe .:AB 20 _pa` to Remain Potential Ra nded --U��its 17.6 - 17 17 002-151-25 1912 N BROADWAY 0.41 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 32.8 - 32 32 002-151-27 2020 N BROADWAY 0.62 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 49.6 - 49 49 002-152-01 1816 N BROADWAY 0.26 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 20.8 - 20 20 002-152-02 1810 N BROADWAY 0.17 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 13.6 - 13 13 002-152-03 1806 N BROADWAY 0.18 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 14.4 - 14 14 002-152-20 1800 N BROADWAY 0.38 P PAO-1 1 1.0 FAR 80 30.4 - 30 30 002-153-21 339 W 17TH I ST 0.12 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 80 9.6 - 9 9 002-153-22 335 W 17TH ST 0.12 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 80 9.6 - 9 9 002-153-25 0.11 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 80 8.8 - 8 8 002-153-26 333 W 17TH ST 0.06 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 80 4.8 - 4 4 002-161-06 2015 N BROADWAY 1 0.41 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 32.8 - 32 32 002-161-07 2009 N BROADWAY 0.24 P PAO-1 1.0 1 FAR 80 19.2 - 19 19 002-161-08 2003 N BROADWAY 0.24 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 19.2 - 19 19 002-161-15 2025 N BROADWAY 0.47 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 37.6 - 37 37 002-162-22 1919 N BROADWAY 0.18 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 14.4 - 14 14 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 Lot ,.Size. ,ry ..::.:....... :,faPland....SaP.: enstt_.,,Base,,,,., AB 2011 AB 2011 Potential Units- ;Ra ed. .,„...AB 24 Total Exempted 207,1 ,.,.. 24 to Remain Potential ..Liounded, 002-162-27 1911 N BROADWAY 0.30 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 24.0 - 002-162-35 1901 N BROADWAY 0.27 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 21.6 - 21 21 002-163-19 1801 N BROADWAY 0.40 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 32.0 - 32 32 002-163-28 IBIS- N BROADWAY 0.08 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 6.4 - 6 6 002-163-29 1819 N BROADWAY 0.08 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 6.4 - 6 6 002-164-06 120 W 18TH ST 0.14 Cl I GC 0.5 FAR 80 11.2 - 11 11 002-164-07 122 W 18TH ST 0.11 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 80 8.8 - 8 8 002-164-10 1717 N BROADWAY 0.21 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 16.8 1 16 16 002-164-11 1711 N BROADWAY 0.21 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 16.8 - 16 16 002-164-22 114 W 18TH ST 0.14 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 80 11.2 - 11 11 002-164-23 1718 N MAIN ST 0.30 C1-MD GC 0.5 FAR 80 24.0 - 24 24 002-164-25 111 W 17TH ST 0.12 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 9.6 - 9 9 002-164-28 123 W 17TH ST 0.32 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 25.6 - 25 25 002-164-29 1702 W MAIN ST 0.47 C1-MD GC 0.5 FAR 80 37.6 - 37 37 002-203-17 2670 N MAIN ST 1.44 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 60 86.4 - 86 86 002-203-22 1 2660 N MAIN ST 0.76 P PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 30 22.8 - 22 22 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 ' Lot ,Size,. 4.38 P Land. Density -Base, AB 2011 AB 2011 Potential Capacity AB 2011 Potential Units- Rounded NEW- 262 Total Exempted AB 2011 ' to Remain Rounded ,-,GP PAO-1.5 1.5 FAR 60 262.7 - 003-010-35 2525 N MAIN ST 262 003-141-31 1705 N BUSH ST 0.54 C1 GC 1.5 FAR 80 43.2 - 43 43 003-143-32 1701 N MAIN ST 0.88 Cl-MD GC 1.5 FAR 80 70.4 - 70 70 005-110-02 402 W 17TH ST 2.68 C5 GC 1.5 FAR 80 214.4 - 214 214 005-111-54 526 W 17TH ST 0.23 C1 GC 1.5 FAR 80 18.4 - 18 18 005-111-55 500 W 17TH ST 0.21 C1 GC 1.5 FAR 80 16.8 - 16 16 005-111-56 502 W 17TH ST 0.22 C1 GC 1.5 FAR 80 17.6 - 17 17 005-111-57 512 W 17TH ST 0.22 C1 GC 1.5 FAR 80 17.6 - 17 17 005-111-58 516 W 17TH ST 0.22 C1 GC 1.5 FAR 80 17.6 - 17 17 005-111-62 520 W I 17TH ST 0.43 C1 GC 1.5 FAR 80 34.4 - 34 34 099-212-50 600 N EUCLID ST 0.13 C2 LR-7 7.0 du/ac 80 10.4 - 10 10 099-213-53 502 N EUCLID ST 0.15 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 1 80 12.0 - 12 12 099-221-22 414 N EUCLID ST 0.24 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 19.2 - 19 19 099-221-27 N EUCLID ST 0.23 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 18.4 - 18 18 099-221-28 402 N I EUCLID ST 0.11 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 8.8 - 8 1 8 099-222-39 306 N EUCLID ST 0.57 1 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 45.6 - 45 45 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 Lot Size.. . _pm „ :.;. m ,.",..:, GP_4 -,> „ GP__Densit --.,,„ AB 2011 Base _ � AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 .-F Potential Units- Rounded. T..'. Total Exem AB to Remain _Potentia! Rounded GC 0.5 FAR 80 48.8 Down 4 099-223-26 202 N EUCLID ST 0.61 Cl - 48 48 099-224-40 122 N EUCLID ST 0.10 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 8.0 - 8 8 099-224-41 118 N EUCLID ST 0.11 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 8.8 - 8 8 099-232-39 5401 W 1ST ST 0.56 C1,R1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 44.8 - 44 44 099-232-41 5423 W 1ST ST 0.36 C1,R1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 28.8 - 28 28 099-232-43 5425 W 15T ST 0.45 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 36.0 - 36 36 099-232-47 5421 W 1ST ST 0.27 C1,R1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 21.6 - 21 21 099-233-23 102 N COOPER ST 0.20 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 16.0 - 16 16 100-291-01 413 N EUCLID ST 0.57 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 45.6 - 45 45 100-291-02 405 N EUCLID ST 0.21 C1 LMR-11 11.0 du/ac 80 1 16.8 2 16 14 108-381-25 5111 W EDINGER AVE 5.69 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 455.2 - 455 455 109-071-11 1400 W MCFADDEN AVE 0.68 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 54.4 - 54 54 109-071-12 1414 W MCFADDEN AVE 0.71 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 56.8 - 56 56 109-071-13 1150 S BRISTOL ST 0.62 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 49.6 - 49 49 109-071-15 1204 S -r-- BRISTOL ST 0.82 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 65.6 - 65 65 109-071-16 1180 S BRISTOL I ST 0.48 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 38.4 - 38 38 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 ,..Size.._ Lot ,. _GP. Land_, ,GP_Drnsit -„;Rase AB 2011 AB 2011 Potential Capacity AB 2011 Potential Units- Rounded.., Total Exem. -AB 2 to Remain Rounded 109-071-18 1136 5 BRISTOL ST 0.96 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 76.8 - 76 76 109-071-19 1212 5 BRISTOL ST 1.91 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 152.8 - 152 152 232-051-11 1231 W MEMORY UN 0.94 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 28.2 - 28 28 232-051-12 2735 N BRISTOL ST 4.5S C1 GC 0.5 FAR 60 273.0 - 273 273 396-031-16 1703 E 17TH ST 0.89 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 26.7 - 1 26 26 396-031-32 1801 E 17TH ST 0.89 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 26.7 - 26 1 26 396-031-34 1737 E 17TH ST 0.74 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 22.2 - 22 22 396-031-35 1727 E 17TH ST 0.59 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.7 - 17 17 396-034-02 1631 E 17TH ST 1.06 CS PAO 0.5 FAR 60 63.6 - 63 63 396-066-01 1625 E 17TH ST 0.39 C5 PAO 0.5 FAR 30 11.7 - 11 11 396-066-02 1621 E 17TH ST 0.39 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 11.7 - 11 11 396-066-06 1535 E 17TH ST 0.35 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 10.5 - 10 10 396-066-09 1525 E 17TH ST 0.21 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 6.3 - 6 6 396-066-10 1505 E 17TH ST 0.40 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 12.0 - 12 12 396-066-14 1611 E 17TH ST 0.12 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 3.6 - 3 3 396-066-15 1615 E 17TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 - 4 4 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 396-066-16 =a� 1605 E 17TH ST Lot �S'e 0.10 I P ; AB 2011 �sitv 30 AB 2011 Capacity Potential Units- Rounded Down Total Exempted AB 2011 Capa to Remain Potential Rounded PAO-1 1.0 FAR Urn �'Mwn 3.0 - 3 3 396-066-17 1595 E 17TH 0.10 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 10 - 3 3 396-066-18 1585 E 17TH -ST ST 0.12 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 3.6 - 3 3 396-066-19 1625 E 17TH ST 1.05 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 60 63.0 - 63 63 396-066-21 1575 E 17TH ST 0.14 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 4.2 - 4 4 396-091-26 1001 E 17TH ST 0.62 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 18.6 - 18 18 396-131-27 2429 N TUSTIN AVE 1.20 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 60 72.0 - 72 72 396-141-01 2301 N TUSTIN AVE 0.51 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 15.3 - 15 15 396-141-07 2151 E SANTA CLARA AVE 0.35 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 10.5 - 10 10 396-141-09 2401 N TUSTIN AVE 0.96 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 28.8 - 28 28 396-141-13 2343 N I TUSTIN AVE 1.04 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 60 62.4 - 62 62 396-141-14 2323 N TUSTIN 1.09 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 60 64.8 - 64 64 396-221-37 1415 E 17TH -AVE ST 0.57 P, R1 PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 17.1 - 17 17 E 17TH ST 0.55 P, RI PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 16.5 - 16 16 E 17TH ST 0.56 P, RI PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 16.9 - 16 16 _N TUSTIN AVE 1.97 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 60 118.2 - 118 118 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 ...:,. �..,,.,. Lot Size ...._.:,_-. C5 _.-,�.... GP Land: �. -..` GP Density - AB 2011 Base 60 AB 2011 CapacitV AB 2011 Potential Units- Rounded Total Exempted AB 2011 70 to Remain .Potential Rounded GC 0.5 FAR 70.8 - 70 396-261-34 2370 N TUSTIN AVE 1.18 396-261-36 2300 N TUSTIN AVE 0.66 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 19.8 - 19 19 396-281-49 2231 N TUSTIN AVE 1.30 CS GC 0.5 FAR 60 78.0 - 78 78 396-281-50 2201 N TUSTIN AVE 0.97 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 29.1 - 29 29 396-281-51 2121 N TUSTIN AVE 0.48 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.4 - 14 14 396-301-02 1921 N TUSTIN AVE 0.55 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 16.5 - 16 16 396-301-05 1931 N TUSTIN AVE 0.29 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 8.7 - 8 8 396-302-01 1901 N TUSTIN AVE 0.68 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 20.4 - 20 20 396-302-02 1829 N TUSTIN AVE 0.52 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 15.6 - 15 15 396-302-03 1819 N TUSTIN AVE 0.72 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 21.6 - 21 21 396-311-22 2205 E 17TH ST 0.68 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 20.4 - 20 20 396-311-24 1810 N TUSTIN AVE 0.42 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.6 - 12 12 396-311-25 1808 N TUSTIN AVE 1.63 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 60 97.8 - 97 97 396-311-27 2217 E 17TH ST 0.85 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 25.5 - 25 25 396-311-28 1717 1 N I OLD TUSTIN AVE 0.34 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 10.2 - 10 10 396-312-15 1 N TUSTIN AVE 0.56 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 16.9 - 16 16 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 _ Lot Size acres . Zone-' C1 GPiand-,. .GP..Uensit - AB 2011 Base Densit" 30 AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 Potential Units- ,;flounded.,,_.,,AB.2011.,. Total Exempted 25 to Remain ,Butential. 25.2 Egund - GC 0.5 sit FAR 25 396-321-13 2107 E 17TH ST 0.84 396-321-15 1975 E 17TH ST 4.44 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 60 266.4 - 266 266 396-321-16 1995 E 17TH ST 0.69 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 20.7 - 20 20 396-321-17 2127 E 17TH ST 1.08 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 60 64.8 - 64 64 396-321-20 1935 E 17TH ST 0.59 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.7 - 17 17 396-321-21 1945 E 17TH ST 3.82 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 60 229.2 - 229 229 396-332-07 2050 N TUSTIN AVE 0.15 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 - 4 4 396-332-08 2030 N TUSTIN AVE 0.13 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 3.9 - 3 3 396-332-09 2010 N TUSTIN AVE 0.15 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.5 - 4 4 396-333-01 1828 N TUSTIN AVE 0.79 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 23.7 - 23 23 396-333-02 1810 OLD TUSTIN AVE 0.16 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 - 4 4 396-352-12 1823 E 17TH ST 0.81 C5, RI GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.3 - 24 24 396-352-13 1833 E 17TH ST 0.78 C5, RI GC 0.5 FAR 30 23.4 - 23 23 396-352-14 1905 E 17TH ST 0.78 C5, RI GC 0.5 FAR 30 23.4 - 23 23 396-352-16 1913 E 17TH ST 1.50 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 60 90.0 - 90 90 398-122-12 210 E 17TH ST 0.25 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 20.0 - 20 20 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 398-392-16 1503 E - 4TH ST ... .:.....,.... Lot Size. ,. 0.13 _.--,-jlFMRFW P C,P.Land PAO ,. ..� GP,Aensity- �.,.....; AB 2011 ,.Base .,., AB 2011 „Potential 10.4 Capacity AB 2011 Potential Units- Rounded , 10 Total Exempted AB 2011 10 to Remain .,Rounded, - 0.5 FAR7800 398-392-17 1507 E 4TH ST 0.10 P PAO 0.5 FAR 8.0 - 8 8 398-392-18 1513 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 13.6 - 13 13 398-392-19 1517 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 80 13.6 - 13 13 398-393-14 1527 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FARP80 13.6 - 13 13 398-393-15 1533 E 4TH ST 0.16 P PAO 0.5 FAR0 12.8 - 12 12 398-393-16 1539 E 4TH ST 0.16 P PAO 0.5 FAR0 4.8 - 4 4 398-393-17 1541 E 4TH ST 0.16 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 4.8 - 4 4 398-393-18 414 N EASTSIDE AVE 0.14 P LR-7 7.0 du/ac 30 4.2 - 4 4 398-401-22 1651 E 4TH ST 2.16 P PAO 0.5 FAR 40 86.4 - 86 86 398-401-23 1633 E 4TH ST 1.28 1 P PAO 0.5 FAR 40 51.2 - 51 51 398-401-24 1617 E 4TH ST 0.60 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 18.0 - 18 18 398-401-25 1611 E 4TH ST 0.58 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 17.4 - 17 17 398-401-26 1605 E 4TH ST 0.24 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.2 - 7 7 398-411-01 1604 E 4TH ST 0.55 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 16.5 1 - 16 16 398-411-02 1608 E 4TH ST 0.47 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 14.1 - 14 14 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 .,::.... 398-431-02 ..-., ..:.., ..,, , _..... ... ..... .� ,.,.,Size,„ 1532 E 4TH ST Lot 0.26 ,�. :.:,�.,,, P GJ' PAO 0.5 FAR AB 2011 30 AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 Potential Units- Rounded Down Total Exempted AB 2011 Capaa" to Remain at ,...Rounded 7.8 'n - 7 7 398-431-03 1526 E 4TH ST 0.25 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 7.5 - 7 7 398-431-32 1522 E 4TH I ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 - 5 5 398-431-33 1518 E 4TH ST 0.17 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 - 5 5 398-431-34 1514 E 4TH ST 0.22 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 - 6 6 398-431-35 1600 E 4TH ST 0.47 P PAO 0.5 FAR 30 14.1 - 14 14 398-441-01 323 N LINWOOD AVE 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 80 11.2 - 11 11 398-441-14 324 N LINWOOD AVE 0.14 P PAO 0.5 FAR 80 11.2 - 11 11 398-441-15 1414 E 4TH ST 0.25 P PAO 0.5 FAR 80 20.0 - 20 20 398-441-16 1410 E 4TH ST 0.24 P PAO 0.5 FAR 80 19.2 - 19 19 398-441-35 1400 1 E 4TH ST 0.34 P PAO 0.5 FAR 80 27.2 - 27 27 399-052-08 901 W 17TH ST 0.35 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 28.0 1 28 28 399-052-09 917 W 17TH ST 0.16 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 12.8 - 12 12 399-053-14 1005 W 17TH ST 0.15 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 12.0 - 12 12 399-064-10 1077 W 17TH ST 0.34 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 27.2 - 27 27 399-064-11 1071 W I 17TH ST 0.97 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 77.6 - 77 77 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 Lot GP: Land.__..GP.Density-,;,-.Base AB 2011 _, AB 2011 Potential Capacity AB 2011 Potential Units- Total Exempted ,AB,2011 to Remain .Rounded .„Rounded 399-064-12 2330 W 1ST ST 0.18 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 14.4 - 14 14 399-065-18 1103 W 17TH ST 0.18 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 14.4 - 14 14 399-065-19 1109 W 17TH ST 0.16 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 12.8 - 12 12 399-071-16 1117 W 17TH ST 0.30 CS PAO 0.5 FAR 80 24.0 - 24 24 399-071-17 1121 W I 17TH ST 0.16 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 12.8 - 12 12 399-072-16 1133 W 17TH ST 0,35 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 28.0 - 28 28 399-072-17 1139 W 17TH ST 0.17 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 13.6 - 13 13 399-072-18 1145 W 17TH ST 0.11 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 8.8 - 8 8 399-072-19 1151 W 17TH ST 0.11 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 8.8 - 8 8 399-085-16 1223 W 17TH ST 0.67 C1, RI GC 0.5 FAR 80 53.6 - 1 53 53 399-085-17 1205 W 17TH ST 0.91 C1, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 1 72.8 - 72 72 399-085-18 1225 W 17TH ST 0.45 C1, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 36.0 - 36 36 399-085-19 1227 W 17TH ST 0.42 C1, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 33.6 - 33 33 399-085-21 1715 N BRISTOL ST 1.10 C1, R2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 88.0 - 88 88 399-101-09 2215 N BROADWAY 0.57 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 45.6 - 45 45 399-101-11 2203 N BROADWAY 0.39 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 31.2 - 31 31 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 = Lot Size acres ...- ....:_ ..: .,. P �.,,,.�.-o.... ,Land,., PAO-1 ,.:: .. GP.Densit. -..,,Base AB 2011 80 AB 2011 M - DacitV AB 2011 Potential Units- ;;Rounded, .. 114 Total Exempted .,AB 2011 114 to Remain Potential.. Rounded 1.0 FAR 114.4 - 399-101-12 2223 N BROADWAY 1.43 399-102-10 2037 N BROADWAY 0.62 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 49.6 - 49 49 399-102-11 2043 N BROADWAY 0.61 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 48.8 - 48 48 399-102-12 2103 N BROADWAY 0.49 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 39.2 - 39 39 399-102-24 2107 N BROADWAY 1.32 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 105.6 - 105 105 399-102-26 2115 N BROADWAY 1.85 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 148.0 - 148 148 399-111-01 2232 N BROADWAY 0.26 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 20.8 - 20 20 399-111-02 2230 N BROADWAY 0.35 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 28.0 - 28 28 399-111-03 2200 N BROADWAY 1.12 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 89.6 - 89 89 399-111-04 2122 N BROADWAY 1.02 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 81.6 - 81 81 399-111-05 2114 N BROADWAY 0.33 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 26.4 - 26 26 399-111-06 2112 N BROADWAY 0.28 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 22.4 - 22 22 399-111-08 2100 N BROADWAY 0.83 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 66.4 - 66 66 399-111-09 2040 N BROADWAY 0.48 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 38.4 - 38 38 399-111-10 2032 N BROADWAY 0.44 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 35.2 - 35 35 399-111-26 2106 N BROADWAY 0.32 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 80 25.6 - 25 25 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 - Lot Size acres Zone GP Land Use GP_12ensit - AB 2011 .Base --sit AB 2011 CapacitV AB 2011 Potential Units - Rounded Down Total Exem AB 21 Capa' to Remain Potential Rounded Units Down 3991121-03 1725 N COLLEGE AVE 4.28 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 342.4 - 342 342 399-121-16 1830 N BRISTOL ST 0.70 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 56.0 - 56 56 399-121-17 1810 N BRISTOL ST 0.66 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 52.8 - 52 52 399-121-18 1702 N BRISTOL ST 1.25 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 100.0 - 100 100 399-121-31 1311 W 17TH ST 6.50 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 520.0 - 520 520 399-121-33 1441 W 17TH ST 7.69 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 615.2 - 615 615 399-121-37 1421 W 17TH ST 1.28 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 102.4 - 102 102 399-121-38 1601 W 17TH ST 1.66 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 132.8 - 132 132 399-121-39 1545 W 17TH ST 1.80 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 144.0 - 144 144 399-121-40 1523 W 17TH ST 2.66 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 212.8 - 212 212 399-121-41 1501 W 17TH ST 0.65 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 52.0 - 52 52 399-121-42 1313 W I 17TH I ST 0.72 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 80 57.6 - 57 57 400-011-01 1950 E 17TH ST 0.80 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.0 - 24 24 400-011-02 1940 E 17TH ST 0.40 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.0 - 12 12 400-011-03 1920 E 17TH ST 0.78 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 23.4 - 23 23 400-011-14 1900 E 17TH ST 0.62 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 18.6 - 18 18 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 _ Lot Lagd... _GP ewrsit s.n; AB 2011 Base.,..,, AB 2011 Capacity A6 2011 Potential Units- ,,.AB-2011, Total Exempted 15 to Remain Pat tia au d d-,.Raunded 0.50 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 15.0 - 15 400-011-18 1840 E 17TH ST 400-011-23 1850 E 17TH ST 0.45 C5 GC 1 0.5 FAR 30 1 13.5 - 13 13 400-011-25 1800 E 17TH 5T 1.99 C5, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 60 119.4 - 119 119 400-012-03 1702 E 17TH ST 0.80 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.0 - 24 24 400-012-04 1750 17TH ST 0.80 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.0 - 24 24 400-012-05 1710 E 17TH I ST 6.34 C5, Rl GC 0.5 FAR 60 380.4 - 380 380 400-121-06 2000 E 17TH ST 5.72 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 60 343.2 - 343 343 400-121-07 2100 E 17TH ST 0.76 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 22.8 - 22 22 400-121-08 2130 E 17TH ST 0.98 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 30 29.4 - 29 29 400-121-09 2250 E 17TH ST 1.40 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 60 84.0 - 84 84 400-121-10 2262 E 17TH ST 9.44 Cl GC 0.5 FAR 60 566.4 - 566 566 400-131-03 1450 N TUSTIN AVE 2.22 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 60 133.2 - 133 133 400-131-04 1350 N TUSTIN AVE 1.58 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 60 94.8 - 94 94 400-151-06 1100 N TUSTIN AVE 0.68 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 30 20.4 - 20 20 400-152-02 1200 N TUSTIN AVE 2.72 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 60 163.2 - 163 163 400-202-02 700 N TUSTIN AVE 1.18 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 60 70.8 - 1 70 70 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 400-202-03 801 N TUSTIN AVE Lot 1.72 P Land .41 PAO-1 Gl?� a si .-_ AB 2011 -.BHcP AB 2011 P t CaoacitV AB 2011 Potential Units- Rounded 103 Total Exem AB 2 Capa to Remain 1.0 FAR 60 103.2 - 103 400-202-04 640 N TUSTIN AVE 1.36 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 60 81.6 - 81 81 400-202-10 720 N TUSTIN AVE 1.27 P PAO-1 1.0 FAR 60 76.2 - 76 76 400-231-03 1301 E 15TH ST 0.17 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 5.1 - 5 5 400-232-14 1302 E 15TH ST 0.16 C5 LR-7 7.0 du/ac 80 12.8 1 12 11 400-242-01 1440 E 17TH ST 0.31 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 9.3 - 9 9 400-242-02 1450 E 17TH ST 0.96 C5, R1 GC 0.5 FAR 30 25.8 - 28 28 400-251-01 1640 E 17TH ST 0.22 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 6.6 - 6 6 400-251-03 1638 E 17TH ST 0.49 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.7 - 14 14 400-251-04 1620 E 17TH ST 0.58 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 17.4 - 17 17 400-251-05 1618 E 17TH ST 0.49 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 14.7 - 14 14 400-251-06 1616 E 17TH ST 0.73 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 30 21.9 - 21 21 400-251-07 1570 E 17TH ST 0.73 CS GC 0.5 FAR 30 21.9 - 21 21 405-251-01 1200 W 17TH ST 0.36 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 28.8 - 28 28 405-251-02 1212 W 17TH ST 0.83 C1, R1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 66.4 - 66 66 405-311-01 1142 W 17TH ST 0.12 1 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 9.6 - 9 9 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 1138 W 17TH ST Lot 0.12 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR AB 2011 80 AB 2011 Capacity AB 2011 Potential Units- d.:-.m,., 9 Total Exempted -.., AB 2011 apacity 9 to Remain Sial."&np:. 9.6 - 405-311-24 405-312-01 1621 N ROSEWOOD AVE 0.16 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 12.8 - 12 12 405-312-29 1120 W 17TH ST 0.97 1 C1, R1 I PAO 0.5 FAR 80 77.6 - 77 77 405-312-30 1108 W 17TH ST 0.71 C1, R1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 56.8 - 56 56 405-312-31 1104 W 17TH ST 0.20 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 16.0 - 16 16 405-312-32 1102 W 17TH ST 0.13 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 10.4 - 10 10 405-312-34 1060 W 17TH ST 0.43 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 34.4 - 34 34 405-312-54 1048 W 17TH ST 0.15 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 12.0 - 12 12 405-313-01 1046 W 17TH ST 0.15 C1 PAO 0.5 FAR 80 12.0 - 12 12 405-321-01 1010 W 17TH ST 4.10 C1, R1 LR-7 7.0 du/ac 80 1 328.0 28 328 300 405-321-02 900 W 17TH ST 2.81 CS GC 0.5 FAR 80 224.8 - 224 224 408-041-01 2720 W I EDINGER AVE 0.43 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 34.4 - 34 34 408-041-02 2700 W EDINGER AVE 1.70 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 136.0 - 136 136 408-041-05 2600 W EDINGER AVE 0.07 C1 GC 0.5 FAR 80 5.6 - 5 5 408-261-12 1610 W EDINGER AVE 0.62 C5 LR-7 7.0 du/ac 80 49.6 4 49 45 408-271-08 1512 W EDINGER AVE 1.08 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 80 86.4 - 86 86 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHEMENT2 408-273-01 1506 W EDINGER AVE Lot ,Siz. ,„,_ 0.57 ,._.,.,.. .„ C5 - n GC :=ensit - 0.5 FAR AS 2011 80 AS 2011 Capacity AS 2011 Potential Units- ,. 45 Total Exempted :'AS 2011,:-. 45 - to Remain otential _..Rounded,,,Rounded 45.6 - 408-273-08 1350 W EDINGER AVE 6.38 C4 GC 0.5 FAR 80 510.4 - 510 510 408-273-11 1308 W EDINGER AVE 2.39 C4 GC 0.5 FAR 80 191.2 - 191 191 408-273-13 1300 W EDINGER AVE 0.27 C4 GC 0.5 FAR 80 21.6 - 21 21 408-273-14 1312 W EDINGER AVE 0.93 C4 GC 0.5 FAR 80 74.4 - 74 74 408-283-34 1622 S BRISTOL ST 2.65 C5 GC 0.5 FAR 80 212.0 - 212 212 408-471-16 1431 W WARNER AVE 0.82 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 24.6 - 24 24 408-471-17 2120 S BRISTOL ST 10.06 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 60 603.8 - 603 603 408-471-18 2222 S BRISTOL ST 0.41 C2 GC 0.5 FAR 30 12.3 - 12 12 003-010-36 2515 N MAIN ST 1.56 P PAO 1.5 FAR 60 93.9 93 93 400-211-12 1551 N TUSTIN AVE 2.57 P PAO 7.5 FAR 60 154.2 154 154 001 0141R i749 w i7TH ST 44 Q tR-q �LB 461ae 99 32:8 2 31 30 nnc�� rota 919 4 F60WERn��R 5ST 4.-39 P PAG 4--& 4;AR 99 1104 9 4i9 4-19 9�-134 49 fi(l € rr�oni AVE 0,99 C4 1JR4 -:B 39 34 9 2. 3. 01c �Iozo-:39-4c n44 2399 S u 66APnv -ST 0.4 C4 Ui4 ,Z.G gy/ac 739 3;9 9 3 3 3nc�i 2031 € cANTri AAOAm AM€ 4.42, A, 7f & 4N& 49 36:8 0 96 36 anon AAA in1 N Ty {iy i&T 47a C4 GC �S FAR 49 4" 0 48 49 Roc a�� 14 M09 N TI I�TIN AVE 4.gg Q yC 03 FAR. 49 43-.2 0 43 43 anc n� 21 I;[ € c4AIT mrI AOAAon AVQ Q16 CS yC gy IFAR 39 4r.8 0 43 -14 Chi%Ri . iid7\Sw\1-1911i1". ATTACHEMENT2 - - e- �. AB 2011 Potential —,tee^ Total A Ordinance No. NS-3075 City of Santa Ana AB 2011 Mixed Income Housing L _. Act of 2022 Amended Exempt Parcels -- / 4 a. �' •1L I g � I srcelme cortex: ]'!: ��.. 3s so wg so sz so-sA sow $ SO BOIe¢epl Gonmmenl Censet Pzlexaplpanl � EP 3m.m.3le BusF gV, PDolesErtnal0lshixl anL Btmtlway Cort tloxUlsW41 •/ - I _ EP9 E.empl Itl vavtyll l: If tlk b'I M1 me parks A neb Fy[tle[Nol Sand Ana- •Ahettng ntluslrla G t,W I-d—as otl v¢r son) Abutting EXIII ntlus[r al tantluse •ryas abN ngammmerua to J fl 5 hw Eel \\ Nele:Ahuttng lsasxvmetlmbe tll n( %eA — — : � anoss lFe nreet anEEaganal la aH � Y� / ATTACHMENT2 i ATTACHMENT3 No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Pursuant to Government Code Section 65912.114(i)(3) (100 Percent Affordable) and 65912.124(i)(3) (Mixed -Income), the alternative sites identified on the alternative sites lists shall result in all of the following: (A) No net loss of the total potential residential capacity in the jurisdiction relative to the total capacity that existed in the jurisdiction through the combined effect of this chapter and local law as of the date of the adoption of the ordinance. In making the no net loss calculation specified by this subparagraph, the local government need only factor in the parcels substituted and reclassified pursuant to this subdivision. (B) No net loss of the total potential residential capacity of housing affordable to lower income households in the jurisdiction relative to the total capacity that existed in the jurisdiction through the combined effect of this chapter and local law as of the date of the adoption of the ordinance. In making the no net loss calculation specified by this subparagraph, the local government need only factor in the parcels substituted and reclassified pursuant to this subdivision. The Ordinance utilizes a multifaceted approach in achieving no net loss of total potential density in the jurisdiction by upzoning (i.e., increasing the permitted General Plan permitted density/intensity) certain parcels that are otherwise eligible for AB 2011 streamlining (Up -zoned Sites) and identifying alternative parcels that are not eligible for AB 2011 and designating them as eligible for AB 2011 streamlining and also upzoning them (Alternative Sites). A combination of the upzoned capacity on Up -zoned Sites and the capacity permitted on the Alternative Sites demonstrate that no net loss of the total potential residential density is achieved. Below, Table 1 and Table 1.5 provide summaries of the no net loss calculations, with Table 2 and Table 3 detailing the calculations on a site -by -site basis for Alternative Sites and Up -Zoned Sites (100 Percent Affordable), and Table 4 and Table 5 detailing the calculations on a site -by -site basis for the Alternative Sites and Up -Zoned Sites (Mixed -Income) on the following pages. Table 1 (Affordable) Exempt, Alternative, and Upzoned Site Unit Capacities Total Total Total Lost Number Total Surplus Surplus Potential/Exempted Total of Acreage Alternative Upzoned Capacity Surplus Parcels Capacity P %� Capacity (Less Existing Capacity to Capacity Remain) Exempt Parcels 569 380.75 10,932 Alternative 161 71.74 4,222 Sites Upzoned 286 271.27 — 17,068 — Sites TOTAL 1 4,222 17,068 10,932 1 10,358 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Table 1.5 (Mixed -Income) Exempt, Alternative, and Upzoned Site Unit Capacities Alternative Sites Total Total Lost Number Surplus Total Potential/Exempted Total of Total Alternative Surplus Capacity Surplus Parcels Acreage Capacity Upzoned (Less Existing Capacity Capacity Capacity to Remain) Exempt 281 244.99 15,481 Parcels Alternative 320 139.96 9,648 Sites Upzoned 194 215.15 7,064 Sites TOTAL 1 9,648 7,064 15,481 1,231 Ordinance No. NS-3075 No Net Loss Calculations ATTACHMENT TABLE 2 AB 2011 as Amended by AB 2243 —Affordable Alternative Sites Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN - Address Zone GP Designation GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres AB 2011- - Site Size acres Net Surplus Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated Base Densi C Lconsolidatedl and rounded down) 10 70 005-184-01 919 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 30 1.26 113.4 113 71 005-184-02 915 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 30 72 005-184-03 843 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.14 30 73 005-184-04 839 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 30 77 005-184-14 900 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 30 78 005-184-15 912 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 30 82 005-184-29 900 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.16 30 83 005-184-30 900 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 30 20 76 005-184-10 801 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 032 30 0.96 86.4 86 79 005-184-25 209 W CIVIC CENTER DR SP3 DC-1 90 0.64 30 21 940 398-455-02 1318 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.15 30 139 34.75 34 941 398-455-03 1322 E 3RD 5T R2 UN-40 40 0.15 30 942 398-455-04 1324 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 30 943 398-455-05 1328 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 30 944 398-455-06 1334 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.07 30 945 398-455-07 208 N MCCLAY ST R2 UN-40 40 0.07 30 946 398-455-08 1327 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 1 30 947 398-455-09 1325 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 30 948 398-455-10 1323 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 30 949 398-455-11 1321 E 2ND 5T R2 UN-40 40 0.29 30 30 74 005-184-07 817 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 30 0.66 59.4 59 75 005-184-08 811 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.49 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN TI r ress 1314 E 2ND ST Zone GP Designation GP Max. Density )units/acre) Parcel Size acres As 2011 Site Size acres Net Surplus C (consolidated) Net Surplus' Capacity' Iconsolidated and Base Density i rounded down) 31 953 398-456-04 R2 UN-40 40 0.14 30 0.82 32.8 32 954 398-456-05 1318 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 30 955 398-456-06 1322 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 30 956 398-456-07 1324 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 30 957 398-456-08 1326 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 30 958 398-456-09 1328 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 30 40 84 005-185-27 902 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.28 30 2.09 188.1 188 86 005-185-94 921 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.65 30 87 005-185-37 915 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.16 30 41 1025 396-562-01 1200 N MAIN ST SP3ID 90 1.55 30 1.61 144.9 144 1026 398-562-02 1104 N MAIN 5T SP3 90 0.06 30 50 88 007-161-02 1918 W 3RD ST R2 30 0.13 30 1.46 21.9 21 89 007-161-03 1914 W 3RD ST R2 30 0.13 30 90 007-161-114 1912 W 3RD ST R2 30 0.13 30 91 007-161-05 1906 W 3RD ST R2 30 0.14 30 92 007-161-06 1904 W 3RD ST R2 30 0.14 30 93 007-161-07 209 N TOWNSEND ST R2 30 0.05 30 94 D07-161-08 1921 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.08 30 95 007-161-09 1917 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 96 007-161-10 1915 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 97 007-161-11 1911 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 98 007-161-12 1907 W 2ND 5T R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 99 007-161-13 1901 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 51 1027 398-562-06 1104 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.67 30 2.55 229.5 229 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites APN Zone Desienation Max. Densi (units/acre) .__ Parcel 5ixe acres AB 2011 Site Size acres Net Surplus Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated Base Density Ca aci Iconsolidatedl--:- 7�M2APIDGPGP . and rounded down( aid 90 0.38 30 398-562-09 1000 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 398-562-10 1010 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.50 30 60 105 007-163-02 1826 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 2.46 36.9 36 106 007-163-03 1822 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 107 007-163-04 1818 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 108 007-163-05 1814 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 109 007-163-07 1837 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.15 30 110 007-163-08 1831 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 111 007-163-10 1819 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 112 007-163-11 1815 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 113 007-163-12 1809 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 114 007-163-13 1805 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 115 007-163-14 1801 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.15 30 116 007-163-15 1821 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 117 007-163-16 1825 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 118 007-163-17 1832 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 119 007-163-18 1834 W 3RD 5T R2 CR-30 30 0.15 30 120 007-163-19 1810 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 121 007-163-21 1802 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.15 30 122 007-163-22 1806 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 30 70 100 007-162-01 1924 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.28 30 0.84 12.6 12 101 007-162-03 1916 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 102 007-162-04 1912 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.11 30 103 007-162-OS 1906 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.17 30 104 007-162-06 1904 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Address Zone GP Designation GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Site Size acr Net Surplus CapacitV (consolidated) Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated and Base Denes sity rounded downl 80 123 007-164-01 1832 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.29 30 0.57 8.55 8 124 007-164-02 1826 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 125 007-164-03 1824 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 90 128 007-183-01 1336 W SANTA ANA BLVD R1 UN-30 30 0.15 30 0.75 17.25 17 129 007-183-02 1332 W SANTA ANA BLVD R3 UN-30 30 0.15 30 130 007-183-03 1326 W SANTA ANA BLVD RS UN-30 30 0.15 30 131 007-183-04 1322 W SANTA ANA BLVD R1 UN-30 30 0.15 30 132 007-183-05 1318 W SANTA ANA BLVD R1 UN-30 30 0.15 30 91 1279 405-176-01 271 N RAITT ST R3 CR-30 30 0.52 30 2.34 35.1 35 1280 405-176-02 1726 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1281 405-176-03 1722 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1282 405-176-04 1722 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1283 405-176-05 1716 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1284 405-176-06 1716 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1285 405-176-07 1706 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1286 405-176-08 1702 W 3RD 5T R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1287 405-176-09 1701 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1288 405-176-10 1705 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1289 405-176-11 1709 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1290 405-176-12 1715 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1291 405-176-13 1717 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 1292 405-176-14 1721 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 100 133 007-183-10 305 N HESPERIAN ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 1.05 15.75 15 134 007-183-12 1323 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 135 007-183-13 1319 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites MAP ID JN .... 2one Density (unit e) Size acres �Density acres Surplus (consolidated and (consolidated) rounded down) , 136 007-183-14 1315 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 137 007-183-15 1305 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 138 007-183-19 1331 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 139 067-183-20 1325 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 110 147 007-201-04 1718 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 0.64 9.6 9 148 007-201-06 1706 W 2ND 5T R2 CR-30 30 0.11 30 149 007-201-07 1702 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.11 30 151 007-201-17 1716 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 152 007-201-18 1712 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 30 120 174 008-082-16 1235 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.14 30 0.42 6.3 6 175 008-082-17 1233 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.14 30 176 008-082-18 1231 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.14 30 124 1339 412-031-03 3050 5 BRISTOL ST R4 UN-30 30 5.64 30 5.64 84.6 84 130 183 008-091-01 315 N BRISTOL ST SP3 UN-30 30 0.27 30 1.92 57.6 57 184 008-091-02 1244 W SANTA ANA BLVD SP1 UN-30 30 0.15 30 185 008-091-03 1240 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 186 008-091-04 1236 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 187 008-091-05 1230 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 188 008-091-06 1226 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.15 30 189 008-091-14 1247 W 3RD ST SPl UN-30 30 0.15 30 190 008-091-15 1239 W 3RD ST SP1 UN-30 30 0.15 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites l - n Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Address � � .19 2=ne GPGP Desi¢natipn AB ) Site Sizes NetSurplus Net Surplus Capacity olidated and ...... .. + an 1 nensitV l (acres) Dense I dated)ro ntled down 191 008-091-16 1237 W 3RD ST SPl UN-30 30 0.15 30 192 008-091-17 1233 W 3RD ST SP1 UN-30 30 0.15 30 193 008-091-18 1229 W 3RD ST SP1 UN-30 30 0.15 30 194 008-091-19 1225 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 1 30 0.15 30 140 342 011-154-20 206 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.28 30 2.84 113.6 113 343 011-154-21 210 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.26 30 344 011-154-22 214 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.37 30 345 011-154-23 220 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.32 30 346 011-154-24 224 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.72 30 347 011-154-25 310 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.65 30 348 011-154-33 318 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.24 30 174 20 002-210-48 2737 N MAINPLACE DR SP4 DC-2.1 90 4.48 30 10.93 983.70 983 22 002-221-30 2800 N MAIN 5T SP4 DC-2.1 90 3.28 30 25 002-222-01 2800 N MAIN ST SP4 DC-2.1 90 3.17 30 190 555 398-015-01 817 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 30 1.37 123.3 123 556 398-015-02 813 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 30 557 398-015-03 809 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 30 558 398-015-04 801 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.98 30 200 564 398-022-10 1107 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.91 30 1.71 153.9 153 1359 398-022-12 1117 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.8 30 220 652 398-231-01 717 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 30 1.26 113.4 113 653 398-231-02 715 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 30 654 398-231-03 711 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN 95 Zone GP Designation Densityize )units/acres GP Ma;0.43 rcel AB 2011 i Net Surplus C (consolidated) Net Surplus Ca aci (consolidated and Base Density rounded dawn) _,.,.. _.,... 655 398-231-06 712 N BUSH ST SP3 DC-1 90.22 30 656 398-231-07 108 E 8TH ST SP3 DC-1 90.22 30 657 398-231-08 701 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 30 230 85 005-185-29 800 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.25 30 1.75 157.5 157 686 398-244-01 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.2 30 687 398-244-02 710 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.3 30 240 889 398-384-09 302 N MCCLAY ST R2 UN40 40 0.26 30 0.82 20.5 20 890 398-384-11 1315 E 3RD ST R2 1.14-40 40 0.14 30 891 398-384-12 1313 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 30 892 398-384-15 1319 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.28 30 80 005-184-26 818 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.87 30 0.87 78.3 78 81 005-184-27 825 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.81 30 0.81 72.9 72 153 007-201-28 1732 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.12 30 0.12 1.8 1 340 031454-01 1406 E 1ST ST C2 UN-40 40 0.49 30 0.49 19.6 19 352 011-154-43 1440 E 1ST ST SD89 UN-40 40 2.16 30 2.16 86.4 86 547 396-361-02 1300 E FAIRHAVEN AVE R4 UN-30 30 6.35 30 6.35 146.0 146 551 398-011-01 909 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.96 30 1.96 176.4 176 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites - -•„---- - GP Max. Parcel AB 2011 Site Net Surplus ]Molid. GPDensity Base C�ci�Consolidatlon MAP ID APN 'i Addr r Zone Desienation Size Size nd units acre acres Density acres (consolidated) 68A ,.rounde.awn 68 0.76 563 398-021-01 1201 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.76 30 1125 402-222-04 212 5 ELK LN R3 DC-3 90 3.96 30 3.96 356.4 356 2.79 251.1 251 1347 430-221-14 2510 RED HILL AVE Ml DC-2 90 2.79 30 1.36 122.4 122 1394 005-185-30 888 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.36 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 No Net Loss Calculations ATTACHMENT TABLE 3 AB 2011 as Amended by AB 2243 - Affordable Up -Zoned Sites Alternative Sites Lot Mao ID APN - Address _ 615 N BUSH ST Parcel Size (acres) Zone i GP Designation GP Density AB Bale Base Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity Consolidation onl U- zoned capacity) rounded down 6 665 398-235-01 0.82 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.44 57.60 57 666 398-235-02 620 N SPURGEON ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 667 398-235-03 600 N SPURGEON ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 668 398-235-04 608 N SPURGEON ST 0.13 SD84 DC-3 90 30 669 398-Z35-OS - N SPURGEON ST 0.21 SD84 DC-3 90 30 8 1030 398-591-06 N BROADWAY 0.17 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.88 35.20 35 1031 398-591-07 N BROADWAY 0.23 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1032 398-592-08 315 3RD ST 0.09 SDB4 DC-3 90 30 1033 398-591-09 329 W BIRCH ST 0.17 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1034 398-591-10 313 BIRCH ST 0.22 SD84 DC-3 90 30 18 1039 398-593-02 414 1 4TH ST 0.21 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.64 25.60 25 1040 398-593-03 412 1 4TH ST 0.07 SD84 I DC-3 90 30 1041 398-593-04 410 4TH 5T 0.11 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1042 398-593-GS 406 4TH 5T 0.18 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1043 398-593-06 402 4TH ST 0.07 SD84 DC-3 90 30 21 939 398-455-01 1310 E 3RD ST 0.49 C2 UN-40 40 30 0.96 9.60 9 950 398-455-16 1315 E 2ND ST 0.47 C2 UN-40 40 30 28 1054 400-041-03 2103 E 4TH ST 2.98 P DC-3 90 30 5.95 357.00 357 1055 400-041-04 600 PARK CENTER DR 2.01 P DC-3 90 30 1056 400-041-05 550 PARK CENTER DR 0.96 P DC 90 30 31 951 398-456-02 1308 E 2ND ST 0.13 C2 UN-00 40 30 1.28 12.80 12 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID PIN '' Address = 1312 E 2ND 5T Parcel Size (acres) Zone C2 GP Designation GP Density AB 2011 Base Dew Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity ool Uc tJ ca aci rounded down 0.14 952 398-456 03 UN-40 40 30 398-456-14 1315 E 1ST ST 0.19 C2 UN-40 40 30 60398-456-15 P9'61 1309 E 1ST ST 0.23 C2 UN-40 40 30398-456-17 1325 E 1ST ST 0.54 C2 UN-40 40 3062 398-456-19 119 N GRAND AVE 0.05 C2 UN-40 40 30 34 1491 410-301-10 1200 w MACARTHUR BLVD 0.42 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 2.30 218.50 218 1480 410-301-11 3601 5 BRISTOL ST 0.58 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 1482 410-301-40 3611 S BRISTOL ST 0.49 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 1483 410-301-41 3611 5 BRISTOL ST 0.81 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 38 1058 400-042-04 601 PARK CENTER DR 1.53 P DC-3 90 30 1.53 91.80 91 44 1440 410-301-15 3811 S BRISTOL ST 0.29 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 11.41 1,083.95 1,083 1441 410-301-17 3925 5 BRISTOL ST 0.41 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 1442 410-301-18 3941 S BRISTOL ST 1.87 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 1443 41G-301-21 3929 S BRISTOL ST 0.75 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 1444 410-301-33 3861 S BRISTOL ST 0.6 CR,R1 DC-S 125 30 1445 430-301-38 3911 S BRISTOL ST 0.58 CR,R1 DC-S 125 30 1446 410-301-39 3821 S BRISTOL ST 6.91 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 46 684 398-243-02 600 N MAIN ST 0.99 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.13 45.20 45 685 398-243-04 618 N MAIN ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 48 1059 400-043-03 2201 E 4TH ST 0.72 P DC-3 90 30 2.40 144.00 144 1060 400-043-04 501 PARK CENTER DR 0.36 P DC-3 90 30 1061 400-043-06 555 PARK CENTER DR 1.32 P DC-3 90 30 54 1486 410-301-43 3701 5 BRISTOL ST 2.95 CR,R1 DC-5 125 30 2.95 280.25 280 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites tot Map ID AP.. 398-252-04 518 ". Y1 's ;,, -", ,., -; :..•, ,. N BROADWAY Parcel Size lacresl Zone SD84 GP Designation GP Density AB 2011 Base Density Site Size 3.60 Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity onl c zoned ca acrt 144.00 Consphdatfon 56 -, : • 688 - - 0.66 DC-3 90 rounded down 144 30 689 398-252-05 301 W 5TH 5T 1.24 SD84 DC-3 90 30 690 398-252-07 400 E SANTA ANA BLVD 1.7 SD84 DC-3 90 30 58 1063 400-051-02 1971 E 4TH ST 1.73 P DC-3 90 30 8.96 537.60 537 1067 400-051-09 1901 E 4TH ST 2.4 P DC-3 90 30 1069 400-051-14 515 N CABRILLO PARK DR 2.55 P DC-3 90 30 1070 400-051-15 525 N CABRILLO PARK DR 2.28 P DC-3 90 30 61 1076 400-062-01 1801 PARK COURT PL 0.69 P UN-40 40 30 3.00 30.00 30 1077 400-062-02 1801 PARK COURT PL 0.S5 P UN-40 40 30 1078 400-062-03 1801 1 1 PARK COURT PL 0.48 P UN-40 40 30 1079 400-062-04 1801 PARK COURT PL 0.58 P UN-40 40 30 1080 400-062-05 1801 PARK COURT PL 0.7 P UN-40 40 66 692 398-254-01 515 N SYCAMORE ST 0.43 SD84 DC-3 90 0.67 26.80 26 693 398-254-02 505 N SYCAMORE ST 0.24 SD84 DC-3 90 68 1064 400-051-03 2001 E 4TH ST 1.16 P DC-3 90 M30 3.47 208.20 208 1065 400-051-05 600 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0.9 P DC-3 90 1109 400-051-12 550 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0.95 P DC-3 90 1068 400-051-13 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0.46 P DC-3 90 76 695 398-255-19 301 W 4TH ST 0.11 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.28 11.20 11 696 398-255-20 305 W 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 697 398-255-21 309 W 4TH ST 0.11 SD84 DC-3 90 30 77 915 398-431-21 1533 E 1ST ST 0.18 C2 UN-40 40 30 0.88 8.80 8 916 398-431-22 1529 E 1ST ST 0.25 C2 UN-40 40 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Mao ID APN 398-431-23 Address 1525 E 1ST ST ^ Parcel Size (acres) Zone C2,R2 GP Designation GP Density AB Ball Base Density Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity ' Consolidation Site Capacity (only Upzoncapaci d ca aci rounded down 0.45 UN-40 30 917 40 7g 1066 400-051-06 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 1.65 P DC 90 30 3.48 208.80 208 1071 400-051-16 2021 E 4TH ST 1.83 P DC-3 40 30 86 699 398-257-01 415 N BROADWAY 0.29 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.44 57.60 57 700 398-257-02 409 N BROADWAY 0.12 SD84 DC-3 90 30 701 398-257-03 223 W 4TH ST 0.05 SD84 DC-3 90 30 702 398-257-04 221 W 4TH ST 0.05 SD84 DC-3 90 30 703 398-257-05 219 W 4TH ST 0.05 SD84 DC-3 90 30 704 398-257-06 217 W 4TH ST 0.05 SD84 DC-3 90 30 705 398-257-07 215 W 4TH ST 0.05 SD84 DC-3 90 30 706 398-257-08 209 W 4TH ST 0.08 SD84 DC-3 90 30 707 398-257-09 203 W 4TH ST 0.35 SD84 DC-3 90 30 708 398-257-10 213 W 4TH ST 0.07 SD84 DC-3 90 30 709 398-257-11 416 N SYCAMORE ST 0.28 SD84 DC-3 90 30 87 922 398-441-28 1411 E 1ST ST US C2 UN-40 40 30 1.05 10.50 10 923 398-441-29 1411 E SST ST 0.08 C2 UN-40 40 30 924 398-441-30 1405 E 1ST ST 0.5 C2 UN-40 40 30 925 398-441-31 111 N MCCLAY 5T 0.08 C2 UN-40 40 30 926 398-441-32 1403 E 15T ST 0.14 C2 UN-40 40 30 1073 400-061-05 -- N CABRILLO PARK DR41.32 P DC-3 90 3088 7.47 448.20 448 1075 400-061-OS -- N CABRILLO PARK DR P OC-3 90 30902 398-391-19 501 N GRAND AVE C1 DC-2 90 3093 0.38 22.80 22 903 398-391-20 419 N GRAND AVE CI DC-2 90 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot ID APN 398-258-01 120 MAddlemBase W STH ST Parcel Size lacresl Zone GP Desfenation GP Density AB Base Densityn1 Site Size Surolus Net Su -• SiteMao round do w Site Capacity onlConsolidation Upzoned capacity) 96 710 0.27 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.98 39.20 39 711 398-258-02 415 N SYCAMORE ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 712 398-258-03 117 W 4TH ST 0.15 SD84 DC-3 90 713 398-258-04 117 W 4TH ST 0.02 SD84 DC-3 90 714 398-258-OS 117 W 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 715 398-258-08 117 W 4TH ST 0.11 SD84 DC-3 90 $�� 717 398-258-13 109 W 4TH ST 0.23 SD84 DC-3 90 98 1086 400-071-03 200 N CABRILLO PARK DR 2.79 SD54 DC-3 90 5.69 341.40 341 1087 400-071-07 1750 E 4TH ST 2.9 SD54 DC-3 90 106 718 398-264-01 117 1 W I 4TH ST 0.1 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.59 23.60 23 719 398-264-02 117 W 4TH 5T 0.1 SD84 DC-3 90 30 720 398-264-03 117 W 4TH ST 0.05 SD84 DC-3 90 30 721 398-264-04 117 W 4TH ST 0.05 SD84 DC-3 90 30 722 398-264-05 117 W 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 723 398-264-06 117 W 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 724 398-264-07 117 W 4TH ST 0.17 SD84 DC-3 90 30 116 725 398-264-09 308 N MAIN ST 0.16 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.30 12.00 12 726 398-264-10 300 N MAIN ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 126 727 398-264-15 202 W 4TH ST 0.31 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.57 -So 22 728 398-264-16 214 W 4TH ST 0.12 SD84 DC-3 90 30 729 398-264-17 220 W 4TH ST 0.05 SD84 1 DC-3 90 30 730 398-264-18 325 N BROADWAY 0.09 SD84 9C-3 90 30 134 2411 412-131-10 1561 SUNFLOWER AVE 2.7 SD48 DES 125 30 17.21 1,634.95 1,634 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Mao 1D Consolidation APN _ Address '- Parcel Size lacresl Zone - GP Designation GP Density AB - 2011 Base Densi Site Size ^Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity onl r� to acit capacity) rounded down 1412 412-131-20 3951 S PLAZA DR 0.48 SD48 DC-S 125 30 1413 1 412-451-01 3811 BEAR ST 1.6 SD48 DC-5 125 30 1414 412-451-02 1661 W SUNFLOWER AVE 4.69 SD48 DC-5 125 30 1415 412-451-03 3851 S BEAR ST 7.35 S048 DC-5 125 30 1416 412-451-04 1641 SUNFLOWER AVE 0.39 SD48 DC-5 125 30 136 731 398-267-01 227 N BROADWAY 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.16 46.40 46 732 398-267-02 217 1 N BROADWAY 0.14 SD84 DC 90 30 733 398-267-03 225 N BROADWAY 0.39 SD84 DC-3 90 30 735 398-267-05 214 N SYCAMORE ST 0.08 SD84 DC-3 90 30 736 398-267-06 217 N BROADWAY 0.13 SD84 DC-3 90 30 737 398-267-09 214 N SYCAMORE ST 0.28 SD84 DC-3 90 30 138 31 003-113-22 2019 N MAIN ST 0.08 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 30 0.46 27.60 27 32 003-113-25 2015 N MAIN ST 0.15 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 30 33 003-113-26 2017 N MAIN ST 0.08 C3-MD OC-1.5 90 30 35 003-113-33 2021 N MAIN ST 0.15 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 30 144 1400 412-131-12 3730 S BRISTOL ST 0.15 C2 DC-5 125 30 41.13 3,907.35 3,907 1401 412-131-13 3700 S BRISTOL ST 0.42 C2 DC-5 125 30 1402 412-131-14 3600 S BRISTOL ST 0.33 C2 DC-5 125 30 1403 412-131-16 3606 s BRISTOL 5T 0.2 C2 DC-5 125 30 1404 412-131-17 3610 S BRISTOL ST 20.28 C2 DC-5 125 30 1405 412-131-22 3900 5 BRISTOL ST 17.17 C2 DC-5 125 30 1406 412-131-24 3810 S BRISTOL ST 0.57 C2 DC-5 125 30 1407 412-131-25 3820 5 BRISTOL ST 0.7 C2 DC-5 125 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Mao ID. APN 3814* S i BRISTOL ST Parcel Size lacresl Zone GP Designation GP Density AB 2011 Base Densi Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity onl JJIr� capacity) c [ansolidation DC-5 125 rounded down 30 1408 412-131-26 1.31 C2 145 580 398-101-06 1202 E STAFFORD ST 0.17 SD84 DC-5 12S 30 1.50 52.50 52 581 396-101-07 1206 E STAFFORD ST 0.18 SD84 DC-5 125 30 582 398-101-08 1210 E STAFFORD ST 0.18 SD84 DC-5 125 30 583 398-SOS-13 1215 E FRUIT ST 0.17 SD84 DC-5 125 30 584 398-101-14 902 N GRAND AVE 0.8 SD84 DC-5 125 30 146 738 398-273-01 117 N BROADWAY 0.42 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.57 22.80 22 739 398-273-03 102 N SYCAMORE ST 0.15 SD84 DC-3 90 30 148 36 003-141-23 1811 N BUSH ST 0.2 P DC-1.5 90 30 1.59 95.40 95. 37 003-141-24 1809 N BUSH ST 0.19 P DC-1.5 90 30 38 003-141-25 1805 N BUSH ST 0.19 P DC-1.5 90 30 39 003-141-26 1801 N BUSH ST 0.21 P DC-1.5 90 30 40 003-141-27 1727 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 30 41 003-141-28 1721 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 30 42 003-141-29 1717 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 30 43 003-141-34 1711 N BUSH ST 0.16 C1 DC-1.5 90 30 44 003-141-35 1715 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 30 254 1475 412-141-10 3401 S PLAZA DR 0.83 C4 DC-2 90 30 3.91 234.60 234 1478 412-141-11 3420 5 BRISTOL ST 0.93 C4 DC-2 90 30 1477 412-141-12 3430 S BRISTOL ST 1.32 C4 DC-2 90 30 1476 412-141-13 3500 51 BRISTOL ST 0.83 C4 ON 90 30 156 740 398-274-01 117 N SYCAMORE ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.54 21.60 21 741 398-274-02 115 N I SYCAMORE I ST 0.15 SD84 DC-3 90 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites 'Lot Consolidation Mao ID APN Address _ Parcel Size (acres) Zone GP Designation GP Density AB 2031 Base Density Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Caoacity Site Capacity onl _ capacied capacity) rounded dawn 66, 742 398-274-04 112 N MAIN ST 0.25 SD84 DC-3 90 30 158 1417 G03-142-01 112 E 20TH ST 0.19 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 30 1.44 86.40 86 1419 003-142-132 1910 N BUSH ST 0.24 P DC-1.5 90 30 1420 003-142-03 1904 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 30 1421 003-142-04 1900 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 30 45 003-142-05 1820 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 9G 30 50 003-142-24 1800 N BUSH ST 0.53 P DC-1.5 90 30 168 46 003-142-17 1903 N MAIN ST 0.15 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 30 1.39 83.40 83 1418 003-142-18 1909 N MAIN ST 1 0.18 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 30 47 003-142-19 1905 N MAIN 5T 0.18 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 30 46 003-142-22 1907 N MAIN ST 0.21 CI -MD DC-1.5 90 30 49 003-142-23 1807 1 N MAIN ST 0.67 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 30 174 21 002-221-28 2800 N MAIN ST 2.94 SP4 DC-2.1 90 30 41.59 2,495.37 2,495 23 002-221-51 2800 N MAIN ST 3.01 SP4 DC-2.1 90 30 24 002-221-52 2800 N MAIN ST 32.15955 SP4 DC-2.1 90 30 19 002-210-34 2700 N MAIN ST 3.48 C2 DC-1 90 30 178 51 003-143-04 1714 N BUSH ST 0.16 P DC-1.5 90 30 0.63 37.80 37 52 003-143-33 1722 N BUSH 5T 0.47 P I DC-1.5 90 30 1S4 349 011-154-37 1530 E 15T ST 1.5 C5 UN-40 40 30 1.63 16.30 16 350 1 031-15438 1600 E 15T ST 0.13 C2 UN-40 40 30 188 1423 003-143-15 1725 N MAIN ST 0.31 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 30 0.49 29.40 29 1424 003-143-16 1719 N MAIN ST 0.15 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 30 1422 0G3-143-31 1701 N MAIN ST 0.03 CI -MD DC-1. 990 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites -IRV Lot Mao ID .�. F- _ APN - .. ' Address ..-......._ Parcel Size lacresl .. „- Zone ,.. ,. GP Desi¢nation ..- GP Densitv -•AB 2011 Density Site Size 1.43 Surplus Net usN sEteCa acConsolidation nde down Site Capacity onlBase Upzoned capacity) ._.......,.-.,.. .- ,_ _s.. 90 30 206 79 Z 398-321-01 517 N MAIN ST 0.31 SD84 DC-3 57.20 57 793 398-321-02 515 N MAIN ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 794 398-321-03 505 N MAIN ST 0.15 SD84 DC-3 90 30 795 398-321-04 503 N MAIN ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 796 398-321-05 117 E STH ST 0.29 SD84 DC-3 90 30 797 398-321-07 510 N BUSH ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 798 398-321-08 520 N BUSH ST 0.26 SD84 DC-3 90 30 216 801 398-324-02 406 E 6TH ST 0.29 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.42 56.80 56 802 398-324-03 410 E 6TH ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 803 398-324-08 409 E 5TH ST 0.14 SD84 OC-3 90 30 804 398-324-09 405 E 57H ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 805 398-324-10 501 N FRENCH ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 806 398-324-12 510 N MORTIMER ST 0.57 SD84 DC-3 90 30 226 809 398-327-06 217-- E 4TH ST 0.25 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.21 48.40 48 810 398-327-07 0.2 SD84 DC-3 90 30 811 398-327-08 0.16 SD84 DC-3 90 30 822 398-327-09 201 1 E I 4TH ST 0.6 SD84 DC-3 90 30 227 1365 398-501-01 102 E 4TH ST 0.04 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.58 23.20 23 1373 398-501-02 104 E 4TH ST 0.07 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1372 398-501-03 106 E 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1371 398-501-04 108 E 4TH ST 0.11 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1370 398-501-OS 112 E 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1369 398-501-06 114 E 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites t Map ID Consolidation APN Address Parcel sire (acres) Zone GP Designation GP Density AB BOSS Base Density Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity site Capacity onl Upzoned ca aci rounded down MR398-501-07 116 E 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1367 398-501-08 118 E 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1366 398-501-09 120 E 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 237 1364 398-501-11 308 N BUSH ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.68 27.20 27 1363 398-501-12 302 N BUSH ST 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1361 398-501-13 301 N MAIN ST 0.23 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1362 398-501-14 309 N MAIN ST 0.17 SD84 DC-3 90 30 240 883 398-384-03 1314 E 4TH 5T 0.14 P UN-40 40 30 1.12 11.20 11 884 398-384-04 1320 E 4TH 5T 0.24 P UN-40 40 30 885 398-384-05 1328 E 4TH ST 0.14 P UN-40 40 30 886 398-384-06 1330 E 4TH 5T 0.13 P UN-40 40 30 887 398-38407 1332 E 4TH 5T 0.13 P UN-40 40 30 888 398-384-08 1334 E 4TH ST 0.13 P UN-40 40 30 893 398-384-17 309 N GRAND AVE 0.31 C2 UN-40 40 30 A 398-503-01 200 E 4TH 5T 0.14 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.26 50.40 50 398-503-02 206 E 4TH ST 0.22 SD84 DC-3 90 30 398-503-03 216 E 4TH ST 0.08 SD84 DC-3 90 30 398-503-30 216 E 4TH ST 0.38 SD84 DC-3 90 30 398-505-04 310 E 4TH 5T 0.07 SD84 DC-3 90 30 398-505-16 300 E 4TH ST 0.37 SD84DC-3 90 30 398-234-01 631 N MAIN ST 0.26 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.36 54.40 54 398-234-04 113 E SANTA ANA BLVD 0.28 SD84 DC-3 90 30 398-234-06 614 N BUSH ST 0.28 SD84 DC-3 90 30 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Mao ID - APN q s;4TH Parcel Size lanes) Zone GP Desfenation GP Density AB 2011 Base Density Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity onl Site CdDd[iLV Consolidation U� rounded down664 398-234-07 601 ST 0.54 SD84 DC-3 90 30 256 1353 398-591-01 324 ST 0.1 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.63 25.20 25 1352 398-591-02 318 4TH ST 0.09 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1354 398-591-03 312 4TH ST 0.17 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1351 398-591-04 310 4TH ST 0.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1350 398-591-OS 302 4TH ST 0.21 SD84 DC-3 90 30 339 011-154-06 1504 E 1ST ST 1.5 C2 UN-40 40 30 1.50 15.00 15 341 011-154-11 1610 E 15T ST 1.19 C2 UN-40 40 30 1.19 11.90 11 351 011-154-42 1620 E 1ST 5T 1.79 C2 UN-40 40 30 1.79 17.90 17 691 398-253-06 200 w SANTA ANA BLVD 1.42 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.42 56.80 56 694 398-254-11 520 N MAIN ST 0.64 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.64 25.60 25 698 398-255-30 302 w 5TH ST 0.18 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.18 7.20 7 799 398-322-01 200 E SANTA ANA BLVD 1.44 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.44 57.60 57 800 398-323-08 300 E SANTA ANA BLVD 1.43 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.43 57.20 57 807 398-325-01 450 E 4TH ST 1.42 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.42 56.80 56 808 398-326-10 300 E 4TH ST 0.48 SD84 DC-3 1 90 30 0.48 19.20 19 813 398-328-01 421 N MAIN ST 1.43 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.43 57.20 57 908 398-421-27 1623 E 15T ST 1.16 C2 UN-40 40 30 1.16 11.60 11 918 398-431-24 1519 E 1ST ST 1.36 C2,132 UN-40 40 30 1.36 13.60 13 919 398-431-25 1503 E 1ST ST 1.07 C2,R2 UN-40 40 30 1.07 10.70 10 920 398-441-07 1427 E 1ST ST 1.93 C2 UN-40 40 30 1.93 19.30 19 921 398-441-08 1421 E 1ST ST 0.83 C2 UN-40 40 30 0.83 8.30 8 1019 398-507-08 400 E 4TH ST 0.34 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.34 13.60 13 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites '-. Consolidation May ID 1035 APN 398-592-07 - Address 204 N BROADWAY Parcel Size (acres) Zone SD84 GP Designation GP Density AB 2011 Base Density Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity onl Uuzoned capacityl rounded down DC-3 90 30 0.28 0.28 11.20 11 1036 398-592-08 116 N BROADWAY ST 0.18 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1 0.18 7.20 7 1037 398-592-09 322 W 3RD ST 0.31 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.31 12.40 12 1038 398-593-01 450 4TH ST 1.06 SD84 DC-3 90 30 1.06 42.40 42 1044 398-601-03 200 N MAIN ST 0.29 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.29 11.60 11 1045 398-601-04 201 N SYCAMORE ST 0.51 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.51 20.40 20 1046 398-602-02 217 N MAIN ST 0.61 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.61 24.40 24 1047 398-603-02 210 1 E 3RD ST 0.29 SD84 DC-3 90 30 0.29 11.60 11 1072 400-052-01 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 1.62 P DC-3 90 30 1.62 97.20 97 1088 400-081-03 1900 E 4TH ST 3.64 P DC-3 90 30 3.64 218.40 218 1089 400-081-04 2000 E 4TH 5T 1.5 P DC-3 90 30 1 1.50 90.00 90 1090 40G-081-05 250 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 1.1 C5 DC-3 90 30 1.10 1 66.00 66 1091 400-081-06 2001 E 1ST ST 1.42 CS DC-3 90 30 1.42 85.20 85 1092 400-082-02 2030 E 4TH ST 1.83 P DC-3 90 30 1.83 109.80 109 1093 400-082-04 203 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR 0.9 CS DC-3 90 30 0.90 54.00 54 1094 400-082-05 2031 E 1ST ST 1.4 C5 DC-3 90 30 1.40 84.00 84 1095 400-091-01 2100 E 4TH ST 1.25 P DC-3 90 30 1.25 75.00 75 1096 400-091-04 2204 E 4TH ST 0.53 P DC-3 90 30 0.53 31.80 31 1098 400-091-16 2201 E 1ST ST 1 C1 DC-3 90 30 1.00 60.00 60 1099 400-091-17 2151 E 1ST ST 1.26 C1 DC-3 90 30 1.26 75.60 75 1300 400.091-18 2131 E 1ST ST 0.79 CS DC-3 90 30 0.79 47.40 47 1101 400-091-19 2101 E 1ST ST 1.81 Cl DC-3 90 30 1.81 108.60 108 1102 400-091-22 2112 E 4TH ST 1.97 P DC-3 90 30 1.97 118.20 118 •I frr, r irsOM101FAAM ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites -' .. .. '- -- Map ID APN F Addresd' Parcel Size lacresl Zone P GP Designation GP Density AB 2011 Base De_ nsity Site Size Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capaciri (only Upzoned capacity) Site Capacity Consolidation " - DC-3 rounded down 1103 -091-23 2130 E 4TH ST 2.64 90 30 2.64 158.40 158 1111 402-181-04 2207 E 1ST ST 1.28 C2 DC-3 90 30 1.28 76.80 76 1114 1 402-191-01 2114 E 1ST ST 2.78 C2 DC-3 90 30 2.78 166.80 166 1115 402-191-02 2020 E 1ST ST 1.2 C2 DC-3 90 30 1.20 72.00 72 1116 402-191-03 2020 E 1ST 5T 3.72 C2 DC-3 90 30 3.72 223.20 223 1117 402-191-04 2110 E 1ST ST 2.92 C2 DC-3 90 30 2.92 175.20 175 1118 402-201-05 1900 E 15T ST 5.78 C5 DC-3 90 30 5.78 346.80 346 1119 402-201-13 2010 E 1ST ST 1.79 C2 DC-3 90 30 1.79 107.40 107 1124 402-222-01 1660 E 1ST ST 2.43 C2 DC-3 90 30 2.43 145.80 145 18 002-163-31 1810 N MAIN ST 0.49 Cl-MD DC-1.5 90 30 0.49 29.40 29 30 003-113-11 111 E 20TH ST 0.17 P DC-1.5 90 30 0.17 10.20 10 34 003-113-29 2005 N MAIN 5T 0.31 C1-MD DC-1.5 90 30 1 0.31 18.60 18 Ordinance No. NS-3075 No Net Loss Calculations ATTACHMENT TABLE 4 AB 2011 as Amended by AB 2243 — Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Alternative Sites Lot Map ID Consoli lotion x 534 APN ...., 1-'- .... Zane ,�,- ... .. GP Designation GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres 0.14 AB 2011 Base Density Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down ..,_., DC-3 Site MIL . 90 80 398-235-03 600 N SPURGEON ST SD84 6 535 398-235-04 608 N SPURGEON ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.13 80 19.2 19 536 398-235-05 SD84 DC-3 90 0.21 80 703 398-334-01 702 E 5TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 704 398-334-02 706 E 6TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 84.4 84 7 705 395-334-05 720 E 6TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.43 80 706 1 398-334-07 701 E 5TH ST S084 UN-30 30 0.72 80 867 398-591-08 315 3RD ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.09 80 8 868 398-591-09 329 W BIRCH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.17 80 19.2 19 869 398-591-10 313 BIRCH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.22 80 63 005-184-01 919 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 80 64 005-184-02 915 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 80 65 005-184-03 843 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.14 80 66 005-184-04 839 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 80 113.4 113 10 70 005-184-14 900 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 80 71 005-184-15 912 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 80 75 005-184-29 900 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.16 80 76 005-184-30 900 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 80 707 398-337-01 702 E 5TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 35 35 17 708 398-337-02 708 E 5TH ST I SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 1 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN 398-337-03 -, 712 E Addre - 5TH ST Zone SD84 GP Designation GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Densi Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down 709 2tel UN-30 30 0.14 80 710 398-337-04 716 E 5TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 711 398-337-05 416 N LACY ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 879 398-593-07 310 N BIRCH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.43 80 18 880 398-593-08 310 N BIRCH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.22 80 26 26 69 005-184-10 801 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.32 80 20 72 005-184-25 209 W CIVIC CENTER DR SP3 DC-1 90 0.64 80 86.4 86 818 398-455-01 1310 E 3RD ST C2 UN-40 40 0.49 80 919 398-455-02 1318 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.15 80 820 398-455-03 1322 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.15 80 821 398-455-04 1324 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 822 398-455-05 1328 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 823 398-455-06 1334 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.07 80 21 824 398-455-07 208 N MCCLAY ST R2 UN-40 40 0.07 80 167.15 167 825 398-455-08 1327 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 826 398-455-09 1325 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 827 398-455-10 1323 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 828 398-455-11 1321 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.28 80 829 398-455-16 1315 E 2ND ST C2 UN-40 40 0.47 80 541 398-237-01 625 N FRENCH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.44 80 26 542 398-237-02 615 N FRENCH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.13 80 67.5 67 543 398-237-03 714 MORTIMER ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.06 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot consolidation Map ID A 398-237-04 .. .. 710 MORTIMER ST Zone SD84 GP Designation GP Max. Density (units/acre) -..... Parcel Size 12Kres . _ ,.. AB 2011 Base Density -..IF Surplus Ne[ i. Surplus' Site Capacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down Site 544 UN-30 30 0.20 80 545 398-237-05 401 E 6TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.52 80 712 398-338-01 602 E STH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.09 80 7.5 7 27 713 398-338-09 409 N MINTER ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.06 80 895 400-041-04 600 PARK CENTER DR P DC-3 90 2.01 60 267.3 267 28 896 400-041-05 550 PARK CENTER DR P DC-3 90 0.96 30 67 005-184-07 817 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 80 59.4 59 30 68 005-184-08 811 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.49 80 830 398-456-02 1308 E 2ND ST C2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 831 398-456-03 1312 E 2ND ST C2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 832 398-456-04 1314 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 833 398-456-05 1318 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 31 834 398-456-06 1322 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 91.2 91 835 398-456-07 1324 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 836 398-456-08 1326 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 837 398-456-09 1328 E 2ND ST R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 841 398-456-19 119 N GRAND AVE C2 UN-40 40 0.05 80 727 398-371-15 601 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.19 80 728 398-371-16 609 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 127 37 729 398-371-17 615 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 127.5 730 398-371-18 617 N EASTWOOD AVE S084 UN-30 30 0.14 80 N7tf rrFTC✓_a2[��F�IrYI�: ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN 621 N EASTWOOD AVE Zone SD84 GP GP Max. (units/acre) Density Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Densi Surplus Net Surplus Ne[ Site Capacity Site Capacity Designation UN-30 (Consolidated Rounded down Site 30 731 398-371-19 0.14 80 732 398-371-20 623 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 733 398-371-21 629 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 734 398-371-22 703 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 735 398-371-23 707 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 736 398-371-24 711 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 737 398-371-25 715 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.15 80 738 398-371-26 717 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.13 80 739 398-371-27 721 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 740 398-371-28 725 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 SO 741 398-371-29 731 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 742 398-371-30 735 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 743 398-371-31 739 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 744 398-371-32 1214 E FRUIT ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.12 80 38 898 400-042-04 601 PARK CENTER DR P DC-3 90 1.53 60 137.7 137 77 005-185-27 902 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.28 80 40 79 005-185-34 921 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.65 80 188.1 188 80 005-185-37 915 N SYCAMORE ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.16 80 860 398-562-01 1200 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.55 80 41 861 398-562-02 SP3 DC-1 90 0.06 80 144.9 144 518 398-221-24 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD P UN-30 30 1.67 80 43 519 398-221-26 52.0 W SANTA ANA BLVD P UN-30 30 0.23 80 176.8 176 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation MAID _ jr Zone GP Designation GP Max. Density units acre Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Caoacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down ., . .... DensitySite 520 398-221-27 311 N VAN NESS ST P UN-30 30 0.21 80 521 398-221-28 520 W 4TH ST P UN-30 30 0.10 80 750 398-372-04 511 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 751 398-372-05 515 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 752 398-372-06 519 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 47 753 398-372-07 1202 E 6TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 49.5 49 754 398-383-01 507 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 755 39398-383-02 501 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 756 8-383-03 419 N EASTWOOD AVE SD84 UN-30 30 0.15 80 400-043-04 501 PARK CENTER DR P DC-3 90 0.36 30 151.2 151 48 400-043-06 555 PARK CENTER DR P DC-3 90 1.32 60 007-161-02 1918 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 N84 007-161-03 1914 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 007-161-04 1912 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 007-161-05 1906 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 007-161-06 1904 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 50 007-161-07 209 N TOWNSEND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.05 80 94.9 94 87 007-161-08 1921 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.08 80 88 007-161-09 1917 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 89 007-161-10 1915 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30913 80 90 007-161-11 1911 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 91 007-161-12 1907 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Zone GP GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Densi Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity Designation (Consolidated Rounded down Site 92 007-161-13 1901 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 862 398-562-06 1104 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.67 80 51 863 398-562-09 1000 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.38 80 229.5 229 864 398-562-10 1010 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.50 80 56 559 398-252-07 400 E SANTA ANA BLVD SD84 DC-3 90 1.70 80 68 68 775 398-385-06 1219 E 3RD ST SD84 UN-40 40 0.15 80 57 776 398-385-07 1215 E 3RD ST SD84 UN-40 40 0.15 80 17.6 17 777 398-385-08 1211 E 3RD ST SD84 UN-40 40 0.14 80 98 007-163-02 1826 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 99 007-163-03 1822 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 100 007-163-04 1818 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 101 007-163-05 1814 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 102 007-163-07 1837 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.15 80 103 007-163-08 1831 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 104 007-163-10 1819 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 60 105 007-163-11 1815 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 159.9 159 106 007-163-12 1809 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 107 007-163-13 1805 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 108 007-163-14 1801 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.15 80 109 007-163-15 1821 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 110 007-163-16 1825 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 111 007-163-17 1832 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidat7Map[D APN 007-163-18 - - !18314W 3RD ST lone GP Designation GP Max. Density Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Densi Surplus Net SurTut Site Capacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down 112 (units/acre) Site R2 CR-30 30 0.15 80 113 007-163-19 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 114 007-163-21 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.15 80 115 007-163-22 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 61 918 400-062-03 180PARKCOURT PL P UN-40 40 0.48 30 19.2 19 64 1080 410-401-05 1212 W CENTRAL AVE C2 UN-30 30 0.34 30 10.2 10 561 398-254-01 515 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.43 80 26.8 26 66 562 398-254-02 505 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.24 80 778 398-386-07 1119 E 3RD ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.11 80 12.5 12 67 779 398-386-08 1115 E 3RD ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 905 400-051-05 600 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR P DC-3 90 0.90 30 68 949 400-051-12 550 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR P DC-3 90 0.95 30 207.9 207 908 400-051-13 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR P DC-3 90 0.46 30 93 007-162-01 1924 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.28 80 94 007-162-03 1916 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 70 95 007-162-04 1912 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.11 80 54.6 54 96 007-162-05 1906 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.17 80 97 007-162-06 1904 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 74 10-411-21 1216 W HEMLOCK WAY C2 UN-30 30 2.10 30 63.0 62 78 00-051-06 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR P DC-3 90 1.65 60 148.5 148 V117007-164-02 07-164-01 1832 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.29 80 37.05 37 80 1826 W 2ND 5T R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites 7�1,n,olida Map ID APN 007-164-03 Pe6' 1824 W 2ND ST Zone R2 GP Designation GP Max. Densi (units/acre) Parcel Sizetion acres 0.14 AB 2011 Base Densi Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down CR-30 Site 30 80 118 86 578 398-257-11 416 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.28 80 11.2 11 87 803 398-441-31 111 N MCCLAY ST C2 UN-40 40 0.08 30 3.2 3 121 007-183-01 1336 W SANTA ANA BLVD Rl UN-30 30 0.15 80 122 007-183-02 1332 W SANTA ANA BLVD R1 UN-30 30 0.15 80 90 123 007-183-03 1326 W SANTA ANA BLVD Rl UN-30 30 0.15 80 54.75 54 124 007-183-04 1322 W SANTA ANA BLVD Rl UN-30 30 0.15 80 125 007-183-05 1318 W SANTA ANA BLVD Rl UN-30 30 0.15 80 1050 405-176-01 271 N RAITT ST R3 CR-30 30 0.52 80 1051 405-176-02 1726 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1052 405-176-03 1722 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1053 405-176-04 1722 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1054 405-176-05 1716 W 3RD 5T R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1055 405-176-06 1716 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1056 405-176-07 1706 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 91 1057 405-176-08 1702 W 3RD ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 141.7 141 1058 405-176-09 1701 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1059 405-176-10 1705 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1060 405-176-11 1709 W 2ND 5T R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1061 405-176-12 1715 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1062 405-176-13 1717 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1063 405-176-14 1721 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidati APN Zone K GP Designation GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base DensitySite Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down ;586 -60 410-421-04 1155 W CENTRAL AVE C2 UN-30 30 1.52 205.2 205 94 410-421-05 1125 W CENTRAL AVE C2 UN-30 30 1.90 60 398-258-01 120 W STH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.27 80 398-258-02 415 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 28 28 96 398-258-10 SD84 DC-3 90 0.09 80 587 398-258-11 SD84 DC-3 90 0.20 80 805 398-451-04 1116 E 3RD ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 12.5 12 97 806 1 398-451-06 212 1 N HATHAWAY ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.11 126 007-183-10 305 N HESPERIAN ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 127 007-183-12 1323 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 128 007-183-13 1319 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 T80 100 129 007-183-14 1315 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 68.25 68 130 007-183-15 1305 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 131 007-183-19 1331 W 3RD 5T R2 UN-30 30 0.15 132 G07-183-20 1325 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 807 398-453-02 SD84 UN-30 30 0.06 80 808 398-453-03 1208 E 3RD ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 809 398-453-04 1210 E 3RD ST SD84 UN-30 3010.14 80 107 810 398-453-05 1214 E 3R0 ST SD84 UN-40 40.14 80 66.8 66 811 398-453-06 202 N GRAND AVE SD84 UN-40 40.54 80 812 398-453-07 1215 E 2ND ST SD84 UN-40 40.14 80 813 398-453-08 1209 E 2ND ST SD84 UN-30 30.14 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN JL 1207 E 2ND ST Zone SD84 GP GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres 0.14 AB 2011 Base Density � Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity Designation UN-30 (Consolidated Rounded down) � Site —1 30 814 398-453-09 80 815 398-453-10 209 N HATHAWAY ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.06 80 137 007-201-04 1718 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 138 007-201-06 1706 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.11 80 110 139 007-201-07 1702 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.11 80 41.6 41 141 007-201-17 1716 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 142 007-201-18 1712 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 117 816 398-454-03 1208 E 2ND ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 817 398-454-14 1221 E 1ST ST SD84 UN-40 40 0.43 80 242 24 162 008-082-16 1235 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.14 80 120 163 008-082-17 1233 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.14 80 27.3 27 164 008-082-18 1231 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.14 80 124 1105 412-031-03 3050 S BRISTOL ST R4 UN-30 30 5.64 80 366.6 366 171 008-091-01 315 N BRISTOL ST SPl UN-30 30 0.27 80 172 008-091-02 1244 W SANTA ANA BLVD SP1 UN-30 30 0.15 80 173 008-091-03 1240 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 130 174 008-091-04 1236 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 175 008-091-05 1230 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 142.35 142 176 008-091-06 1226 W SANTA ANA BLVD R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 177 008-091-14 1247 W 3RD ST SPl UN-30 30 0.15 SO 178 008-091-15 1239 W 3RD ST SP1 UN-30 30 0.15 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites ot idation Man ID r,n APN - - 1237 W 3RD ST Zone SP1 GP Designation GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Density Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down UN-30 Site 179 008-091-16 30 0.15 80 180 008-091-17 1233 W 3RD ST SPl UN-30 30 0.15 80 181 008-091-18 1229 W 3RD ST SP1 UN-30 30 0.15 80 182 008-091-19 1225 W 3RD ST R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 609 398-267-05 SD84 DC-3 90 0.08 80 136 610 398-267-06 SD84 DC-3 90 0.13 SO 19.6 19 611 398-267-09 214 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.28 80 281 011-154-20 206 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.28 30 282 011-154-21 210 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.26 30 283 011-154-22 214 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.37 30 140 284 011-154-23 220 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.32 30 85.2 85 285 011-154-24 224 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.72 30 286 011-154-25 310 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.65 30 287 011-154-33 318 S LYON ST R3 UN-40 40 0.24 30 145 504 398-101-13 1215 E FRUIT ST SD84 DC-5 125 0.17 80 5,95 5 154 1231 412-141-10 3401 S PLAZA DR C4 DC-2 90 0.83 80 74.7 74 615 398-274-01 117 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 11.6 11 156 616 398-274-02 115 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.15 80 642 398-301-12 710 N LACY ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.09 80 41 41 166 643 398-301-13 714 N LACY ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.18 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID - APN 724 N �ry LACY ST Zone GP GP Max. Densi (units/acre) Parcel Size acres AB 2013 Base Densi Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity 644 Designation (Consolidated Rounded down Site 398-301-16 SD84 UN-30 30 0.18 80 646 398-301-20 718 N LACY ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.37 80 19 002-210-48 2737 N MAINPLACE DR SP4 DC-2.1 90 4.48 60 20 002-221-28 2800 N MAIN ST SP4 DC-2.1 90 2.94 60 174 21 002-221-30 SP4 DC-2.1 90 3.28 60 1519.2 1519 22 002-221-51 2800 N MAIN ST SP4 DC-2.1 90 3.01 60 24 002-222-01 2800 N MAIN ST SP4 DC-2.1 90 3.17 60 176 649 398-302-02 717 LACY ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.08 80 653 398-302-14 LACY SD84 UN-30 30 0.35 80 21.5 21 475 398-015-01 817 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 476 398-015-02 813 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 190 477 398-015-03 809 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 123.3 123 478 398-015-04 801 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.98 80 196 658 398-311-05 607 E 6TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.11 80 5.5 5 481 398-022-10 1107 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.91 80 200 1124 398-022-12 1117 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.80 80 153.9 153 670 398-321-05 117 E STH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.29 80 206 671 398-321-07 510 N BUSH DC-3 90 0.14 80 27.6 27 672 398-321-08 520 N BUSH DC-3 90 0.26 80 675 398-324-02 406 E 6TH 9VDC-3 DC-3 90 0.29 80 216 676 398-324-03 410 E 6TH 90 0.14 80 56.8 56 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites 7C.ns.fid.t... APN I 0 Zone SD84 GP Designation GP Max. Densi units acre Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Density Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded down DC-3 Site 677 398-324-08 409 E STH ST 90 0.14 80 678 398-324-09 405 E STH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 679 398-324-10 501 N FRENCH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 680 398-324-12 510 N MORTIMER ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.57 80 522 398-231-01 717 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 523 398-231-02 715 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 524 398-231-03 711 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 113.4 113 220 525 398-231-06 N BUSH ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.22 S0 526 398-231-07 108 E STH ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.22 80 527 398-231-08 701 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.43 80 454 396-161-02 1800 N GRAND AVE C4 UN-30 30 0.76 30 222 455 396-161-03 1750 N GRAND AVE C4 UN-30 30 0.55 30 44.1 44 457 396-161-08 1818 N GRAND AVE C4 UN-30 30 0.16 30 685 398-327-01 SD84 DC-3 90 0.22 80 226 687 398-327-07 SD84 DC-3 90 0.20 80 23.2 23 688 398-327-08 SD84 DC-3 90 0.16 80 78 005-185-29 800 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.25 80 230 555 398-244-01 SP3 DC-1 90 0.20 80 157.5 157 556 398-244-02 710 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.30 80 1130 398-501-10 314 N BUSH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.11 80 237 1129 398-501-11 308 N BUSH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 15.6 15 1128 398-501-12 302 N BUSH ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites ID IA�N 398-384-09 302 N ddress MCCLAY ST Zone R2 GP2011 GP Max. Density (units/acre) ParcelLot SizeConsolidationDesignation acres AB Base Density Surplus Net Surplus Net Site Capacity Site CapaciriMap 767 (Consolidated Rounded down Site UN-40 40 0.26 80 240 768 398-384-11 1315 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 769 398-384-12 1313 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 53.3 53 770 398-384-15 1319 E 3RD ST R2 UN-40 40 0.28 80 693 398-332-04 520 E 6TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 694 398-332-05 519 E 5TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 246 695 398-332-06 515 E 5TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 71 71 696 8-332-10 502 E 6TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.57 80 697 39398-332-11 505 E 5TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.43 80 254 529 398-234-04 113 E SANTA ANA BLVD SD84 DC-3 90 0.28 80 11.2 11 698 398-333-02 610 E 6TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 699 398-333-07 609 E 5TH 5T SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 255 700 398-333-10 512 N PORTER ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.43 80 71.5 71 701 398-333-11 601 E 5TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.43 80 702 398-333-12 621 E 5TH ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.29 80 74 005-184-27 825 N BROADWAY SP3 DC-1 90 0.81 80 72.9 72 1160 005-185-30 888 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.36 80 122.4 122 133 007-183-25 1306 W SANTA ANA BLVD C2,SP1 UN-30 30 0.64 80 51.2 51 140 007-201-14 110 N WESTERN AVE C2, R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 11.2 11 143 007-201-28 1732 W 2ND ST R2 CR-30 30 0.12 80 7.8 7 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites 77Map 011-154-10 1406 E 1ST ST Zone RI GP Designation GP Max. Densi (units/acre) Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Density Surplus Net - olus Net Site Capacity (Consolidated Rounded downil UN-40 40 Site 279 0.49 30 14.7 14 291 011-154-43 1440 E 1ST ST SD89 UN-40 40 2.16 40 86.4 86 469 396-361-02 1300 E FAIRHAVEN AVE R4 UN-30 30 6.35 60 336.5 336 473 398-011-01 909 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 1.96 80 176.4 176 480 398-021-01 1201 N MAIN ST SP3 DC-1 90 0.76 80 68.4 68 665 398-315-01 902 BROWN ST SD84 UN-30 30 0.10 80 5.0 5 673 398-322-01 507 N BUSH ST SD84 DC-3 90 1.44 80 57.6 57 674 398-323-08 300 E SANTA ANA BLVD SD84 DC-3 90 1.43 80 57.2 57 684 398-326-11 SD84 DC-3 90 0.69 80 27.6 27 852 398-503-11 SD84 DC-3 90 0.81 80 72.9 72 $72 398-592-09 322 W 3RD ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.31 80 12.4 12 883 398-601-04 201 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.51 20 885 398-603-02 210 E 3RD ST SD84 DC-3 90 0.29 11 912 400-052-01 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR P DC-3 90 1.62 145 930 400-081-05 250 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR C5 DC-3 90 1.10 A 99 933 400-082-04 203 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR CS DC-3 90 0.90 81 957 402-191-04 2110 E 1ST ST C2 DC-3 90 2.92 262 965 402-222-04 212 S ELK LN R3 DC-3 90 3.96 356 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites 11 Lot Consolidation Map ID - APN vi 410-401-09 Y 1209 W HEMLOCK WAY Zone GP Designation GP Max. Density (units/acre) Parcel Size acres 1.38 AS 2011 Base Densite us Net Surplus Net apacity Site Capacity :fConsolidated Rounded down 41 1083 41.4 30 C2 UN-30 30 1111 412-191-06 1331 W CENTRAL AVE C4 UN-30 30 2.85 60 171.0 170 1113 430-221-14 2510 RED HILL AVE Ml DC-2 90 2.79 60 251.1 251 Ordinance No. NS-3075 No Net Loss Calculations ATTACHMENT TABLE 5 AB 2011 as Amended 6v AB 2243 - Mixed -Income Ulp-Zoned Sites Alternative Sites. Lot Consolidation 4D_ Address ZONE GP Designation lot Size acres GP Density AB 2011 Site Size(onlyrounded Surplus Net Site Su N - Ca a Capacity Base Densi u zoned . 1 615 N BUSH ST SD84 DC-3 0.82 90 80 6 620 N SPURGEON ST SD84 DC-3 0.14 90 80 0.96 9.60 9 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.17 90 80 8 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.23 901 80 0.40 1 4.00 4 874 398-593-02 414 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.21 90 80 875 398-593-03 412 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.07 90 80 18 876 398-593-04 410 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.11 90 80 0.64 6.40 877 398-593-05 406 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.18 90 80 6 878 398-593-06 402 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.07 90 80 28 894 400-041-03 2103 E 4TH ST P DC-3 2.98 90 60 2.98 89.40 89 1237 410-301-10 1200 W MACARTHUR BLVD CR, R1 DC-5 0.42 125 SD 1236 410-301-11 3601 S BRISTOL ST CR, R1 DC-5 0.58 125 80 34 1238 410-301-40 3611 5 BRISTOL ST CR, R1 DC-5 0.49 125 80 2.30 103.50 103 1239 410-301-41 3611 S BRISTOL ST CR, R1 DC-5 0.81 125 80 1198 410-301-14 3801 S BRISTOL ST CR, RI DC-5 0.38 125 80 1199 410-301-15 3811 S BRISTOL ST CR, RI DC-5 0.29 125 80 1200 410-301-17 3925 S BRISTOL ST CR, R1 DC-5 0.41 125 80 1201 410-301-18 3941 S BRISTOL ST CR, R1 DC-5 1.87 125 80 44 1202 410-301-21 3929 S BRISTOL ST CR, R1 DC-5 0.75 125 80 11.79 530.55 530 1203 410-301-33 3861 5 BRISTOL ST CR, R1 DC-5 0.60 125 80 1204 410-301-38 3911 S BRISTOL ST CR, Ri DC1 0.58 125 80 1205 410-301-39 3821 S BRISTOL ST CR, R1 DCC 5 6.91 125 80 46 552 398-243-01 615 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 I DC-3 1 0.25 1 901 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot ' ..., .. Map :-. `" APN . ....... .. Address - 600 N MAIN ST ZONE GP - Lot Size (acresl GP AB 2011 Site Size Surplus Net Site -Surplu5 Net Site Capacity Base Densi Capacity Consolidation ID Designation Density onl upzoned rounded down ca aci 553 398-243-02 SD84 DC-3 0.99 90 80 554 398-243-04 618 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.14 90 80 1.41 14.10 14 48 899 400-043-03 2201 E 4TH ST P DC-3 0.72 90 30 0.72 43.20 43 54 1242 410-301-43 3701 S BRISTOL ST CR, Rl DC-5 2.95 125 80 2.95 132.75 132 56 557 398-252-04 518 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.66 90 80 1.90 19.00 19 558 398-252-05 301 W 5TH ST SD84 DC-3 1.24 90 80 903 400-051-02 1971 E 4TH ST P DC-3 1.73 90 60 907 400-051-09 1901 E 4TH ST P DC-3 2.40 90 60 4.13 123.90 123 58 909 400-051-14 515 N CABRILLO PARK DR P DC-3 2.55 90 40 910 400-051-15 525 N CABRILLO PARK DR P DC-3 2.28 90 40 4.83 241.50 241 916 400-062-01 1801 1 PARK COURT PL P j UN-40 1 0.69 401 30 61 917 400-062-02 1801 PARK COURT PL P UN-40 0.55 40 30 1.24 12.40 12 68 904 400-051-03 2001 E 4TH ST P DC-3 1.16 90 60 1.16 34.80 34 564 398-255-19 301 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.11 90 80 76 565 398-255-20 305 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 0.28 2.80 2 566 398-255-21 309 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.11 90 80 793 398-431-21 1533 E 15T ST C2 UN-40 0.18 40 30 77 794 398-431-22 1529 E 1ST ST C2 UN-40 0.25 40 30 0.88 8.80 s 795 398-431-23 1525 E 1ST ST C2, R2 UN-40 0.45 40 30 78 911 400-051-16 2021 E 4TH ST P DC-3 1.83 90 60 1.83 54.90 54 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lpt Consolidation Mao APN Address ZONE GP Designation Lot Size acres GP Densi AB 2011 Site Size(only Net Site Surplus Net Site Capaci (rounded Ca aci Base DensitV ID upzoned down 568 398-257-01 415 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.29 90 80 569 398-257-02 409 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.12 90 80 1.16 11.60 11 570 398-257-03 223 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 571 398-257-04 221 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 572 398-257-05 219 W 4TH 5T SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 86 573 398-257-06 217 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 574 398-257-07 215 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 575 398-257-08 209 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.08 90 80 576 398-257-09 203 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.35 90 80 577 398-257-10 213 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.07 90 SO 800 398-441-28 1411 E 1ST ST C2 UN-40 0.25 40 30 801 398-441-29 1411 E 1ST ST C2 UN-40 0.08 40 30 87 802 398-441-30 1405 E 15T ST C2 UN-40 0.50 40 30 0.97 9.70 9 804 398-441-32 1403 E 1ST ST C2 UN-40 0.14 40 30 913 400-061-05 P DC-3 1.32 90 60 1.32 39.60 39 88 915 400-061-08 P DC-3 6.15 90 40 6.15 307.50 307 780 398-391-19 501 N GRAND AVE C1 DC-2 0.23 90 80 93 781 398-391-20 419 N GRAND AVE C1 DC-2 0.15 90 80 0.38 3.80 3 581 398-258-03 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.15 90 80 582 398-258-04 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.02 90 80 583 398-258-05 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 96 584 398-258-08 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.11 90 80 0.92 9.20 9 585 398-258-09 410 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 588 398-258-12 420 N MAINI ST SD84 DC-3 0.30 90 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Mao APN - 398-258-13 - Address 109 W 4TH ST '., _ ZONE GP ... ,..... Lot Size acres GP AB .. Site Size Surplus Net Site Surplus Net Site Capacity Basese Densi ...city Consolidation ID - - - SD84 Designation Densi onl y upzoned rounded dow _ ca aci 589 DC-3 0.23 90 80 98 927 400-071-07 1750 E 4TH ST SD54 DC-3 2.90 90 60 2.90 87.00 87 590 398-264-01 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.10 90 80 591 398-264-02 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.10 90 80 592 398-264-03 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 106 593 398-264-04 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 594 398-264-05 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 0.59 5.90 5 595 398-264-06 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 596 398-264-07 117 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.17 90 80 597 398-264-09 308 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.16 90 80 598 398-264-10 300 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.14 90 80 116 599 398-264-13 201 W 3RD ST SD84 DC-3 1.41 90 80 1.80 18.00 18 600 398-264-14 SD84 DC-3 0.09 90 80 601 398-264-15 202 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.31 90 80 602 398-264-16 214 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.12 90 80 0.57 5.70 5 126 603 398-264-17 220 W 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.05 90 80 604 398-264-18 325 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.09 90 80 1175 412-131-10 1561 SUNFLOWER AVE SD48 DC-5 2.70 125 80 1176 412-131-20 3951 S PLAZA DR SD48 DC-5 0.48 125 80 1177 412-451-01 3811 BEAR ST SD48 DC-5 1.60 125 80 134 1178 412-451-02 1661 W SUNFLOWER AVE SD48 DC-5 4.69 125 80 17.21 774.45 774 1179 412-451-03 3851 S BEAR ST SD48 DC-5 7.35 125 80 1180 412-451-04 1641 SUNFLOWER AVE SD48 DC-5 0.39 125 80 605 398-267-01 227 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.14 90 80 136 606 398-267-02 217 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.14 90 80 0.67 6.70 6 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map i APN 398-267-03 ,,..,.: - Address 225 N BROADWAV ZONE GP Designation Lot Size acres 0.39 GP Densi AB 2011 Site Size jji Surplus Net Site Surplus Net Site Capacity Capacity Base Densityupzoned ID 607 SD84 onl rounded DC-3 down capacity) 90 80 29 003-113-22 2019 N MAIN ST Cl- MD DC-1.5 0.08 90 80 30 003-113-25 2015 N MAIN ST C1- MD DC-1.5 0.15 90 80 138 31 003-113-26 2017 N MAIN ST C1- MD DC-1.5 0.08 90 80 0.46 4.60 4 33 003-113-33 2021 N MAIN ST C1- MD DC-1.5 0.15 90 80 1166 412-131-12 3730 S BRISTOL ST C2 DC-5 0.15 125 80 1167 412-131-13 3700 S BRISTOL ST C2 DC-5 0.42 125 80 1168 412-131-14 3600 1 S BRISTOL ST C2 DC-5 0.33 125 80 1169 412-131-16 3606 1 S BRISTOL ST C2 I DC-5 0.20 125 80 144 1170 412-131-17 3610 S BRISTOL ST C2 DC-5 20.28 125 80 41.13 1,850.85 1,850 1171 412-131-22 3900 S BRISTOL ST C2 DC-5 17.17 125 80 1172 412-131-24 3810 S BRISTOL ST C2 DC-5 0.57 125 80 1173 412-131-25 3820 S BRISTOL ST C2 DC-5 0.70 125 80 1174 412-131-26 3814' S BRISTOL ST C2 DC-5 1.31 125 80 612 398-273-01 117 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.42 90 80 1.00 10.00 10 146 613 398-273-03 102 N SYCAMORE ST SD84 DC-3 0.15 90 80 614 398-273-04 222 W 2ND ST SD84 DC-3 0.43 90 80 1234 412-141-11 3420 S BRISTOL ST C4 DC-2 0.93 90 80 154 1233 412-141-12 3430 S BRISTOL ST C4 DC-2 1.32 90 80 30 1232 412-141-13 3500 S BRISTOL ST C4 DC-2 0.83 90 80 3.08 30.80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites :... .,. 5.. ... ... ... .... .__: ,_.,. us Sum_ Net Site AB 2011 Net Site Capacity Lot Map ZONE GP Lot Size GP Site Capacity Consolidation APN Address- Designation acres Densi Base Size ID onl Density upzoned rounded 2 156 617 398-274-04 112 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.25 90 80 0.25 2.50 C1- 158 1181 003-142-01 112 E 20TH ST MD DC-1.5 0.19 90 80 0.19 1.90 1 Cl- 34 003-142-17 1903 N MAIN ST MD DC-1.5 0.15 90 80 C1- 1182 003-142-18 1909 N MAIN ST MD DC-1.5 0.18 90 80 Cl- 168 35 003-142-19 1905 N MAIN ST MD I DC-1.5 0.18 1 90 1 80 1.39 13.90 13 C1- 36 003-142-22 1907 N MAIN ST MD DC-1.5 0.21 90 80 C1- 37 003-142-23 1807 N MAIN ST MD DC-1.5 0.67 90 80 18 002-210-34 2700 N MAIN ST C2 DC-1 3.48 90 60 174 23 1 002-221-52 2800 N MAIN 5T SP4 DC-2.1 32.16 90 60 35.64 1,069.19 1,069 184 289 011-154-38 1600 E 1ST ST C2 UN-40 0.13 40 30 0.13 1.30 1 C1- 1184 003-143-15 1725 N MAIN ST MD DC-1.5 0.31 90 80 C1- 188 1185 003-143-16 1 1719 N MAIN ST MD DC-1.5 0.15 90 80 0.49 4.90 4 C1- 1183 003-143-31 1701 N MAIN ST MD DC-1.5 0.03 90 80 666 398-321-01 517 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.31 90 80 206 667 398-321-02 515 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.14 90 80 074 740 7 668 398-321-03 505 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.15 90 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites of Consolidation Map APN Address, ZONE GP Designation Lot Size GP Density As 2011 Site Size _ Surplus Net Site Surplus Net Site Capacity Base Density Capacity ID acres onl upzoned rounded down ca acit 669 398-321-04 503 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.14 90 80 686 398-327-06 217-* E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.25 90 80 226 689 398-327-09 201 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.60 90 SO 0.85 8.50 8 1131 398-501-01 102 E 4TH ST SD84 I DC-3 1 0.04 90 80 1139 398-501-02 104 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.07 90 80 1138 398-501-03 106 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 1137 398-501-04 108 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.11 90 80 227 1136 398-501-05 112 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 1135 398-501-06 114 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 0.58 5.80 5 1134 398-501-07 116 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 1133 398-501-08 118 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 1132 398-501-09 120 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 237 1126 398-501-13 301 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.23 90 SO 1127 398-501-14 309 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.17 90 80 0.40 4.00 4 848 398-503-01 200 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.14 90 80 849 398-503-02 206 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.22 90 80 247 850 398-503-03 216 E 4TH 5T SD84 DC-3 0.08 90 80 851 398-503-10 216 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.38 90 80 1.26 12.60 12 853 398-505-04 310 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.07 90 80 854 398-505-16 300 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.37 90 80 528 398-234-01 631 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.26 90 SO 254 530 398-234-06 614 N BUSH ST SD84 DC-3 0.28 90 80 531 398-234-07 601 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.54 90 80 1.08 10.80 10 256 1118 398-591-01 324 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.10 90 SO 1117 398-591-02 318 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.09 90 SO O.63 6.30 6 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Mao All Address ZONE GP Designation Lot Size acres 0.17 GP Densi AB 2011 Site Size - Net Site'' _. Net Site Ca aci Base Densi capacity ID onI rounded 90 80 1119 312 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 1116 310 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.06 90 80 1115 398-591-05 302 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.21 90 80 682 398-326-08 325 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.20 90 80 259 683 398-326-16 300 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.48 90 80 0.68 6.80 6 17 002-163-31 1810 N MAIN ST Cl- MD DC-1.5 0.49 90 80 0.49 4.90 4 32 003-113-29 2005 N MAIN ST C1- MD DC-1.5 0.31 90 80 0.31 3.10 3 560 398-253-06 200 W SANTA ANA BLVD SD84 DC-3 1.42 90 80 1.42 14.20 14 563 398-254-11 520 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.64 90 80 0.64 6.40 6 567 398-255-30 302 W 5TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.18 90 80 0.18 1.80 1 681 398-325-01 450 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 1.42 90 80 1.42 14.20 14 690 398-328-01 421 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 1.43 90 80 1.43 14.30 14 799 398-441-08 1421 E 1ST ST C2 UN-40 0.83 40 30 0.83 8.30 8 855 398-507-08 400 E 4TH ST SD84 DC-3 0.34 90 80 0.34 3.40 3 870 398-592-07 204 N BROADWAY SD84 DC-3 0.28 90 80 0.28 2.80 2 871 398-592-08 116 N BROADWAY ST SD84 DC-3 0.18 90 80 0.18 1.80 1 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map 398-593-01 Address •, .,,., 450 4TH ST ZONE GP Designation Lot Size acres GP Densi A82011 Site Size - Surplus,:.. Net Site n . ur u5 Net Site Base Densi Capacity Ca aci ID 873 onl SD84 DC-3 rounded down 10 capacity)upzoned 1.06 90 80 1.06 10.60 881 398-601-02 SD84 DC-3 0.64 90 80 0.64 6.40 6 882 398-601-03 200 N MAIN ST SD84 DC-3 0.29 90 1 80 0.29 1 2.90 2 884 398-602-02 217 N MAIN I ST SD84 DC-3 0.61 90 80 0.61 6.10 6 928 400-081-03 1900 E 4TH ST P DC-3 3.64 90 60 3.64 109.20 109 929 400-081-04 2000 E 4TH ST P DC-3 1.50 90 60 1.50 45.00 45 931 400-081-06 2001 E 1ST ST C5 DC-3 1.42 90 60 1.42 42.60 42 932 400-082-02 2030 E 4TH ST P DC-3 1.83 90 60 1.83 54.90 54 934 40G-082-05 2031 E 1ST ST C5 DC-3 1.40 90 60 1.40 42.00 42 935 400-091-01 2100 E 4TH ST P DC-3 1.25 90 60 1.25 37.50 37 936 400-091-04 2204 E 4TH ST P DC-3 0.53 90 30 0.53 31.80 31 938 400-091-16 2201 E 1ST ST C1 DC-3 1.00 90 60 1.00 30.00 30 939 400-091-17 2151 E 1ST ST C1 DC-3 1.26 90 60 1.26 37.80 37 940 400-091-18 2131 E 1ST ST Cl DC-3 0.79 90 30 0.79 47.40 47 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT No Net Loss Calculations Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map - APN ... - Address ZONE GP Designation Lot Size acres 1.81 - GP Densi AB 2011 Site Size - 1.81 Net Site Surplus Net Site apacitv i Base Den sity Capacity ID _ onl upzoned 54.30 rounded DC-3 90 60 54 941 400-091-19 2101 E 1ST ST C1 942 400-091-22 2112 E 4TH ST P DC-3 1.97 90 60 1.97 59.10 59 943 400-091-23 2130 E 4TH ST P DC-3 2.64 90 60 2.64 79.20 79 951 402-181-04 2207 E 1ST ST C2 DC-3 1.28 1 90 60 1.28 1 38.40 38 954 402-191-01 2114 E 1ST ST C2 DC-3 2.79 90 60 2.78 83.40 83 955 402-191-02 2020 E 15T ST C2 DC-3 1.20 90 60 1.20 36.00 36 956 402-191-03 2020 E 1ST ST C2 DC-3 3.72 90 60 3.72 111.60 ill 958 402-201-05 1900 E 15T ST C5 DC-3 5.78 90 60 5.78 173.40 173 959 402-201-13 2010 E 1ST ST C2 DC-3 1.79 90 60 1.79 53.70 53 964 402-222-01 1660 E I 1ST 5T C2 DC-3 2.43 90 60 2.43 72.90 72 TOTAL - _ 7. Ordinance No. NS-3075 City of Santa Ana AB 2011 100% Affordable Housing Act of 2022 <4Cl MD Cx IA, CS, CkC-SM: sed1WsD3],565G.56W eµ✓ _ / 5661.SLL]x 5D ]g Jl ' I � •..•. I m� .+ / \ sDM (earepfGmmmen![enfpl �� i � Y SPrye.agaak) r sP3�eNY�e Oushsb Pwlesswnal oisblGaatl / � 6waxryCOMaor DlsMrq 3 Pm 0— lmazeoe walWnl: •nuua 6rmobllehomeparFs /` - - pmetlhytM1eClryolSandRnar _ •µuMng ntluNlelGenenl Phn Preaz�oltlntlson) Mb -IngblNnglntlusblalla= 1 Nore Fbutring lssume sdbbeo apem aesaaja•en[�z C e.wee nemeer,a aie onau a . � � II /" �, j a` Maple e Ellg ble PrO Proper[es ■ memaa.e sm � u�canea sl�a i o .. City of Santa Ana�5®�\ AB 2011 Mixed Income Housing .. Act of 2022 �. Eligible Properties I_ ---- _' I r t■ 411 l- - so.uleuemeor<mmeneunrep sPpwwegw.f - - spskWceolo-Pmlesslonal olaattana e. e awarumaaaroNNlnl'— spa E'm0on. lane. not NvaIIN NI- If useeformmdleheme Paaw !F - _. - - ewnetlb/Ne[INotSand a •uW W...,General PMa A let bens kla veet tlmnf •Ab=9UidnelnaeNoiNUnd e J •Not o.oN a mmmertlil mMtl,l/eN 15Okw Oe1/( - ■ - - No\e.AbuMngbassumeab acmislhe s,rtet,ana dla[analfo,l k Noef - - ■ / wt i Eligible Pmpertes t, e � Anamau.. sn. �Nwonee sk _ , ATTACHMENT 3 N„a.w:,N,Naag. ATTACHMENT 3 Site and Environmental Criteria Alternative Sites All of the alternative sites, comprised of alternative and up -zoned sites, that have been identified on the alternative sites lists meet the criteria described in subdivisions (b) through (f) of Section 65912.111(100 Percent Affordable), or meet the criteria described in subdivisions (b) through (f) of Section 65912.121 (Mixed -Income). All of the sites are within the City of Santa Ana boundary, which is an incorporated city and designated as an urbanized area by the United States Census Bureau. Moreover, all of the alternative sites adjoin parcels that are urban uses since the entirety of the City of Santa Ana is designated as an urbanized area by the United States Census Bureau. The Alternative Sites Maps depict that none of the alternative sites adjoin industrial uses, as defined in AB 2011. The environmental criteria maps on the following pages also demonstrate that the sites satisfy the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4. Lastly, none of the alternative sites are parcels that are governed under the Mobilehome Residency Law, the Recreational Vehicle Park Occupancy Law, the Mobilehome Parks Act, or the Special Occupancy Parks Act. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Downey Norwalk Cerrito Legend C City of Santa Ana G County Boundaries CDFW owned and Operated lands and Consemtlon Easements Rolugical aesene Wildlife Area Fish Hatchery Public Access undesignated Miscellaneous Source: Calif=la Department of Fish and Wildlife (CO"; CDFW GLS oearingho ise (ds3e 2J N W+E SS 0 25 5 10 Miles 'no Hills Sta ark Fullerton Corona Anaheim d GocOrange G FounVal01 o,i e in Irvine Lake Costa Mesa Elsinore Rancho Santa or Mission Margarita g Viejo Laguna Laguna Niguel San eonen < Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, CH of I ire, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA. USGS. Bureau of Land Management, EPA NPS City of Santa Ana California Department of Fish and Wildlife Owned and Operated Lands and Conservation Easements Ordinance No. ATTACHMENT 3 Downey Norwalk Ccrri Legend C City of Santa Ana O County Boundaries ® Critical Habitat Source: MS HQ rs ottkal Habitat McGIS HubrWS HQ ES Crnkal Habbt - Polygon Poannes -Prcal layer. A sped is geWaphk area(s) that caRalm features a al for the oareervanon of a threatened or eM g&ed spades and that nuy require s W m genent and protection. N W+E S 0 2.5 5 10 Miles r r Fullerton Anaheim GardenOrane cq5— rove�ounValOranile n Irvine Costa Mesa a k A HE Corona 39 P' •,..mot-•�----•r � 1 t ■ Lake Elsinore 7Rjtnchonn�Mission gtrit� Viejo Wilde Laguna I Laguna Niguel ch 4111 � I S clue e Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, Cit of me, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Es I, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA NPS City of Santa Ana - Ordinance No.Gritical Habitat of Endangered or Threatened Species LL ATTACHMENT Downey Norwalk ' Fullerton Anaheim Garden Orange :h Grove • Santa Ana Founni Valley .ngton Irvine Bea Costa Mesa Legend O City of Santa Ana O County Boundaries = CGS Alquist Priolo Fault Zones Source: Sesmc Hazards Prcgran Gridurua Geolaryd Survey, GIIlomia Departman or Cdservatim N W+E s 0 2.5 5 10 Miles Hills ;;r'h Corona Rancho Santa Mission Margarita Viejo Laguna na Niguel San Lake Elsinore Esn, NASA, NGA, USGS, Ci of Ifine, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Gar min. SafeGraph, METVNASA USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS Fal] City of Santa Ana Alquist Priolo Fault Zones rH77 Ordinance No. kd ATTACHMENT Downey a. Norwalk lm Hills SIa . iirl. Corona Cerritos Fullerton Anaheim 0 1 Garden Orange eh J Grove • Santa Ana � lets Fountai �• Valley or" utpe untington Irvine + `• ` Beach �• 'I Costa Mesa�< Legend Rancho Santa O City of Santa Ana or Mission Margarita O County Boundaries B Viejo California Important Farmland O Prime Farmland Laguna = Farmland of Statewide Importance Laguna Niguel Soorce: California Department of ConsemUon Farmland Mapping & Mondonng Program: CalUomla Important Famdand Fl.der NN W + E VS 0 2.5 5 10 Miles Lake Elsinore r ,P San e cmcn c Esri. NASA, NGA, USGS, Cit of I ine, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Esri, HERE,- Garmin, Safe&aph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA NPS Fall City of Santa Ana a, Ordinance Rrlkae Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance LL`r=p ATTACHMENT Downey Noru alk Legend O City or Santa Ana O County eou nes Are Hazard Seventy Z In tocal RespaWbillty Area lands Very High Hre Hazard Severity Zones In State Responsibility Area lands Very High High Moderate Source: CAL FIRE Portal; The State or California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protecnwi N W+E S 0 25 5 10 Miles Fullerton Anaheim Ged- GroveOrane FoumVal(1 r,l u,ir rn Irvine Costa Mesa Hills Corona F f Mon Vail r v s La + E Is ore cho ++ rr Mission a ^ k Viejo r r Wild Laguna Esri. NASA, NGA, USGS, Ci o e, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Gatmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA. NPS a ' __ .r..__ Fil' City of Santa Ana Fire Hazard Severity Zones Ordinance No. Ct7 City of - Santa Ana _ AB 2011 Aw��' 100% Affordable Housing _- f Act of 2022`� Eligible Properties and s FEMA Flood Hazard Zone i F 1a i i _ i ��iio■ r. �lJi r '. uu.■ OEM e s m:C i ■ 1 i q EgegeZones: CI,CY ,11, 11,C gM. - r ' SD LSD 0SRSI 50 gG SD 60 e D-69,SO ao 50.10 (TM r w le.a eee.e.nmemcenrerl - - - SPEleveegparkl 111L.1y M1e Bus65ta, P•olesional DiFRantl r Bra a a I ma a.em n M •ceomn " I le _ - wn tl byIncn - •pnel" a s I la h I — bun g a a i3{ -nbun .mea he bea tl % aamaa Zerteel and aaonell neRmn / j Map Legend - IF - c El14A ChanceIPlead Hazard igible Pi . Pllennaive 5le �.,J,Fl aH aidZane -Ine nel ATTACHNINT 3 smile—anhea a r: armgnu .IS J - Milo F 1 Mn C3�CgCSCP, C-SM' SP SOdE.50.9g.s0.5E50.5956W i 'I � - - so�w,soax,mve = ' soar¢.¢ m¢mc¢mm� sF3^^vm¢ efn 11, wal¢¢¢ana oaveana - .. �. Co rdway roaorulnr=e &emp�onoaI uauHRC ` • Iru:¢dmr µ �¢ nam¢ pats u-n maw smmartmav •owned nv meaty^rsaotapna -r _ •pbumng nau'del 4—.1Flan preae am veaeun - •pEurYngGs(ng ntlusna lanaus¢ - xa¢. Penang-¢aaanm¢mnneprn apa¢ns - - - .I �� -.. ae,n..mem.al and angnnelmr' nn. _ - / I I, Map Legend }) Regulatory FlooWrey - - EllgibleProperles Nbrnaeve Ste i� �Vpmnetl 511e �. ,. _ AftdW ty FEMA PegulaNry Fbo -rnomr 0 ATTACHMENT City of Santa Ana AB 2011 100% Affordable Housing Act of 2022 Eligible Properties and Hazardous Waste Sites / ■�■Y -I- �' ■ WIN Mail NMI • \ �. l Elleiblez cl, c, s, C0. C�sM, • - - so-sz, w,s10 E<, 106o unsoae /- e+lexapP"we�ememcemed - - , axlexappl - e a�:nss, v,m.eem.ei obmae.a mslo�ro 1.,j .3 s.e.a.ev Eammr olml.�� SF4 ne(aceenelssaity g �• fu'setl l,.,, ebomepa, k • cqr •penabob ep a m ) - -_ - list,: Ablis, is..eemea abev eeroe: neroeee,enatles=.•i m� e.eeamss ATTACHMENT 3 City of Santa Ana id ' AN AB2011 -� 100% Affordable Housing Act of 2022 Eligible Properties and Wetlands fr Deepwater Habitats AM IL nyleleudei: P. f 3g sd<e sdsy so sa, sow / �- sD-60SO725973 = Snd9�e¢epeedvemmeneCen@r - sP3 on"mah) SP 3 anfy-,oPmen Pm(esslanal015Vlasand - g,eaawav�Medro imn� so A � 'llusetl brmoblle home Wr4Owl ` ComphIblVIddamm5an = bvlheOry deemed Rna f •pbuNnglnauSeal General plan Ia cepsdn) J ` AbuNng FahSing lnEusVlaltantl f - - Note Ab.P."suumeate beprdp rtl a�eenL m hed'. eetmaelagonalhrN atl a- Map Legend ■ Ca,ldmlaftnandi, _- i. Eligible P p r[es AXemeli S,m Jmmd �Affielood Vietlanm/ �J ' paWrvel Haddl am, m � e �- ATTACHNIEN City of Santa Ana I -- AB 2011 Mixed Income Housing L :. 5j - =•� Act of 2022�� Eligible Properties and FEMA Flood Hazard Zone _ 5 ; jaw ed ,,� �� gip" � r>••� �' _ . �a� i 'I 1, M i a I, 5n 31 S SpR<g Se-53 SRSa N 5 6e S JE 5 _ g ` 5ee4 le eomrl - - J sraia�l pn eni 1 al-1bnaupa Eremp[o la oaary rc.l-. _ 3 I. 3 j u vel ehh- •ow�mh n cn 1 { Fbun el I Ivl enraaxmm.etl:op I II! ■ ¢ '-_. ___ I �t •nb�n Ig]a 'I e le ;h acrosx he rtreel antlaa¢anal lor�[erse[n � 1 � • ya � � - '-� / No mm.- 1 iii as i P:°nn Ich ceppaFlH i EligibleP P rtles 3� ......« >4 '. h SI - ❑NI VR tl51e ARM a by Fl pe Huard ne none) / `. ATTACHb4IJNT 3 ` ` City of Santa Ana _ F AB 2011 Mixed Income Housing , — r. Act of 2022 Eligible Properties and FEMA Regulatory Floodway i 3 r ■ ��_ r1 3 I i (!3-M0.[y 6U5 [q. .CRM, P. lsbge, so-sx, 50.Wlexep[GoremmeM Cenh) SP31onIVk,e eusFStr. ProRulonal gsW[l ana It maawa, cnmaemimml e Exemptlnna lenesncl yuaurynl - i • If ussmur muh la Home w•ks • erAnedltwltM1n sm fe¢ nitreewav Ownetl " E "•^' -' _ 'bVn,e ClryalSaMa An �_ -�` � _ Vk •Phukln, edU4lal Generzl""dFseaslobuxelun) •¢ • ■ ■ i- 'Rhuhng Glsl nglnauaMaltann E - ■• rvo[ffiulingaummeNaleoma (]11h 150k 1ae1,- p -oe. aemss[M1eYree4 PbMmelsassu dl,o fPmP rtl alagowlbrinRrsestlons , 1V /'•�- Map Ugentl _ . _ ..,, _ _ 41.„,_•. - +l' RegulM ropeotlxey e Eligible erlDes �OXuneWa Sile Uintnk a. Aff..tyF Regulalory gooWreyne-Inmel l 0 ATTACHMENT 3 City of h Santa Ana AB 2011 \._ Mixed Income Housing i Act of 2022 Eligible Properties and Hazardous Waste SitesOwl s 1 d ■ I � .ass � _ ;� o■�� • �Ci� -� so sP sun so ve so- \ a '4 %i 1 sPs1n ns P r ^a o ra ,d a� a -- Br tl omtlor OlsNR� Camel W F 1 ItreewaV n tlb 1V IS P a • '• /" •ft,ftl, g I a "1 1 P1 oPnas lea a.aaN - '" I � t••' ■ i� � �� Ne[ •Nb 0ka1 gm ah memal cartlaor U. ]SONwae)� bt Ie: Pbunne b a::umeembe P-Penlesaal—Az fr j - ■ I �/. - r �., arms:eoave^amEesaase.a lei 1� ___ -__• / / / Ww . • / , , F i ,r.mcw ATTACHMENT City of Santa Ana =- AB 2011 �;' _ ` 1 Mixed Income Housing Act of 2022�� Eligible Properties andL Wetlands B Deepwater Habitats 1 ' t moo ME Mali Noun i .f �. 1, _ ■ f I -- r 10 i■■■■! • - r q ; EIUIbk IDnes' - x 315ai33a 3E 3O5q•SpW /Y ` 56W 50 ]E 5D ]0 SPEM(mvtPtWk)- P3(anIYMa aM1idoo Dhesional Olrtrutantl - BmaawaYCnlaorOnuVlttl 'i i svq e vemvnon:lace: nor.ualirval' / `-. - f • :Camp am ok"themnsu aaaof reewavmbyth1a •.tm119maueMal Ci11W11LanFreaa(ula 'Not emlnMaeommemal oomeoq'rort 3sonwl note:A mv.tlaaemealobepropare:aalaeem iy. ■' /" wmaam kmaeladen,1mnMa.R1.p i ■ Uffomi.Rbtlanea i •.."" P •L a Eligible PrapeNes Sito . Ukaanetl 5ile - _ "`®" _ - •.A 4P'.. �Mette]Ey K4tlaneN DoaP rHatlm (none) ATTACHMENI'43 J 1 � \ ATTACHMENT 3 Identification of Alternative Sites State law permits local governments to adopt a local AB 2011 implementing ordinance to exempt parcels of land from the streamlining provisions provided certain findings are made. A local government must identify one or more alternative sites for residential development and make findings that the alternative development would result in no net loss of the total potential residential density permitted in the jurisdiction, no net loss of the potential residential density of housing affordable to lower income households in the jurisdiction, and will affirmatively further fair housing. Further, Government Code sections 65912.114(i)(2)(A) and 65912.124(i)(2)(A) require that a local implementing ordinance that identifies an alternative site to accommodate the lost potential units from exempt sites that is not otherwise eligible for development pursuant to AB 2011, be "suitable for residential development" as defined in Government Code Sec. 65583.2 of State Housing Element law. The analysis below will demonstrate how all parcels identified as alternative sites by the City of Santa Ana's implementing ordinance which are not otherwise eligible for development pursuant to AB 2011 meet the Housing Element law definition for land suitable for residential development as defined in Gov. Code Sec. 65583.2. AB 2011 Potential Housing Units Lost from Exempted Sites Santa Ana's local implementing ordinance exempts 569 parcels from AB 2011—Affordable and 281 parcels from AB 2011— Mixed -Income permit streamlining, respectively. Table 1 below provides the total number of lost potential units for AB 2011 — Affordable and AB 2011— Mixed -Income streamlining provisions. The City of Santa Ana's local implementing ordinance utilizes a multifaceted approach in achieving no net loss of total potential density in the jurisdiction by upzoning (i.e., increasing the permitted General Plan permitted density/intensity) certain parcels that are otherwise eligible for AB 2011 streamlining (Upzoned Sites) and identifying alternative parcels that are not eligible for AB 2011 and designating them as eligible for AB 2011 streamlining and also upzoning them (Alternative Sites). A combination of the upzoned capacity on Upzoned Sites and the capacity permitted on the Alternative Sites demonstrate that no net loss of the total potential residential density is achieved. Table 1 (Affordable) and Table 1.5 (Mixed - Income) provide the total unit capacity of Upzoned and Alternative sites, respectively, and also provide the total surplus capacity created between the two categories. In both cases, Affordable and Mixed - Income, the total Surplus Capacity is greater than the Lost Potential capacity from the exempt parcels — demonstrating that no net loss will be achieved. While detailed no net loss calculations and methodology are provided separately on tables provided to HCD staff, this analysis will focus on demonstrating that the Alternative Sites are suitable for residential development and complywith Gov. Code Sec. 65583.2 of State Housing Element law. Table 1(Affordable) Fvcmnt AltarnntivP_ and Un7nnPd Site Unit Canacities Total Total Total Lost Number Total Surplus Surplus Potential/Exempted Total of Acreage Alternative Upzoned Capacity Surplus Parcels Capacity Capacity p y (Less Existing Capacity to Capacity Remain) Exempt 569 380.75 10,932 Parcels 1 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Total Total Total Lost Number Total Surplus Surplus Potential/Exempted Total of Acreage Alternative Upzoned Capacity Surplus Parcels Capacity Capacity (Less Existing Capacity to Capacity Remain) Alternative 161 71.74 4,222 Sites Upzoned Sites 286 271.27 17,068 TOTAL 4,222 17,068 10,932 10,358 Table 1.5 (Mixed -Income) Exempt. Alternative. and Upzoned Site Unit Canacities Total Total Total Lost Number Total Surplus Surplus Potential/Exempted Total of Alternative Capacity Surplus Parcels Acreage Capacity Upzoned (Less Existing Capacity Capacity Capacity to Remain) Exempt 281 244.99 15,481 Parcels Alternative Sites 320 139.96 9,648 Upzoned Sites 194 215.15 7,064 TOTAL 9,648 7,064 15,481 1,231 Sites Inventory Consideration It is important to note that the capacity analysis is a planning exercise and does not mandate the elimination of existing use(s) or building(s) on a property. Instead, this analysis demonstrates that the City's zoning and land use designations as applied to specific sites is adequate to accommodate possible units on specific sites. This capacity analysis looks at the Alternative Sites and applies the greater of the existing development capacities as permitted by the City's land use plan which would be permitted to be developed pursuant to AB 2011 streamlining or the densities permitted by AB 2011, and calculates the resultant number of housing units that could be provided. General Plan Density/Intensity The City adopted the General Plan Update in 2022 and zoning ordinance amendments to increase residential densities for mixed -use designations and zones. Table 2 below illustrates the current maximum permitted densities by General Plan land use designation and groups the corresponding land uses of the Alternative Sites by AB 2011 category (i.e., Affordable or Mixed -Income). Please note that while maximums are provided in the Table 2, minimum development densities must comply with AB 2011. Pursuant to AB 2011, a development project utilizing AB 2011 permit streamlining must develop to at least the maximum permitted by the local jurisdiction's land use plan or by default densities established by the law. This analysis will utilize the minimum default densities established for Affordable (30 dwelling 2 Ordinance No. NS-3076 ATTACHMENT 3 unit per acre) or Mixed -Income (30-80 dwelling units per acre) where the General Plan does not permit equal to or greater densities for the alternative sites. In cases where the General Plan permits higher densities than those specified in AB 2011, the General Plan permitted densities will be utilized as minimums. Table 2 General Plan and AB 2011 Category (Affordable/Mixed-Income) Required Maximum Density General Plan Designations Density Corridor Residential 3o du/ac Urban Neighborhood -Medium Low 30 du/ac Industrial Flex- Low 30 du/ac Urban Neighborhood -Medium 40 du/ac AB 2011 - 30 du/ac Urban Neighborhood -High 50 du/ac Affordable District Center -Low 90 du/ac 90 du/ac District Center -Medium Low 90 du/ac District Center -Medium 90 du/ac District Center -Medium -High 125 du/ac District Center -High Corridor Residential 30 du/ac 3o du/ac Urban Neighborhood -Medium Low 30 du/ac Industrial Flex- Low 40 du/ac Urban Neighborhood -Medium 50 du/ac AB2011— Mixed- Income 30-80du/ac Urban Neighborhood -High District Center -Low 90 du/ac 90 du/ac District Center -Medium Low 90 du/ac District Center -Medium 90 du/ac District Center -Medium -High 125 du/ac District Center -High Realistic Capacity Assumption Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Pursuant to AB 2011, a development project utilizing AB 2011 permit streamlining must develop to at least the maximum permitted by the local jurisdiction's land use plan or by default densities established by the law, whichever is greater. The capacities included in this analysis will utilize the minimum default densities established for Affordable (30 dwelling unit per acre) or Mixed -Income (30-80 dwelling units per acre) where the General Plan does not permit equal to or greater densities for the alternative sites. In cases where the General Plan permits higher densities than those specified in AB 2011, the General Plan permitted densities will be utilized. Since AB 2011 establishes minimum densities for permit streamlining qualification, this analysis will not include a "realistic capacity" analysis as Is typically found in housing elements. Rather, will rely on the AB 2011 minimum densities or the General Plan densities where they are greater in compliance with applicability requirements established in AB 2011. Site Infrastructure and Services Water and Sewer Infrastructure The City operates and maintains Santa Ana's sewer system, which serves the entire city and portions of Garden Grove and Orange. The City's sewer collection system consists of approximately 450 miles of sewer mains, including approximately 60 miles of Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) regional trunk facilities within the city. The system operates largely by gravity and discharges at several locations into OCSD gravity trunk sewers for conveyance to OCSD Treatment Plant 1. The City's most recent Sewer Master Plan update was performed in December 2016, The 2016 Sewer Master Plan Update Final Report (SMP) was an update to a sewer capacity analysis performed in 2003. The 2016 SMP analyzed the age of the sewer infrastructure, and the capacity of the City's sewer collection system for existing and future peak -flow conditions under both dry and wet weather conditions. In addition, the 2016 SMP summarized the rankings of the condition of the sewer pipes/manholes and the recommended rehabilitation and replacement of these sewers. The results of the capacity analysis and condition assessment are summarized below. City Sewer Capacity The capacity of the City's sewer system was assessed for all major trunk lines with diameters ranging from 10 to 39 inches in size. In total, approximately 97 miles of City pipelines, 20 miles of OCSD trunk lines, and a total of 1,799 manholes were modelled. The capacity of the system was assessed for existing and future (2040) base flow scenarios in addition to peak wet -weather flows (PWWF) derived for a 10-year storm event. The SMP identified four areas of the City where sewer capacity deficiencies were identified. The most significant areas of potential wet weather capacity deficiencies are between Fairhaven Avenue and 17th Street running through Old Grand Street, to Santa Clara Avenue, and then onto Wright Street in the northeastern area of the city. In addition to the sewer capacity assessment, the City assessed the condition of its sewer system. The review identified several defects in the condition in the sewer system, primarily in the central part of the city, including the downtown area. This area is known to have older pipes compared to the outer neighborhoods and consequently has more defect issues. Capital improvement projects are prioritized to allocate available funds to critical projects based on risk of failure and level of impact to economic, social, and environment issues. Similar to many public agencies, Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT the City has an annual budget for replacing or rehabilitating aging infrastructure and therefore requires a systematic and defensible method for prioritizing both capacity and condition -based improvement projects. The SMP has aided in prioritizing projects on each year's CIP. The SMP references 20 projects for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016/2017 to FY 2020/2021. The current 2018/2019 CIP sewer projects are listed below: • Bristol Street Sewer Main Improvements • Santa Ana Memorial Neighborhoods Sewer Main Improvements • Warner Garnsey Sewer Main Diversion Improvements (project listed in SMP as CIP-CAP-006A) • Willard Neighborhood Sewer Main Improvements Furthermore, the current CIP projects currently under design or construction are listed below: • Citywide Sewer Main Improvements Phase II • Columbine Sewer Main Improvements • Washington Square Neighborhood Sewer Main Improvements • Flower Street Sewer Main Improvements (Washington Street —17th) • Segerstrom/San Lorenzo Sewer List Station In addition to the SMP and CIP sewer system management procedures, the City currently requires sewer monitoring studies for all projects that go through the entitlement process. After submittal and review of these studies by City staff, if the sewer system is found to be deficient, the developer will be required to upsize the portion of the sewer pipe within the frontage of their property. There may be options depending on the condition of the sewer infrastructure for the developers to enter into a joint cost - sharing agreement with the City to cover a portion of the cost for required upsizing that may be done by the City at a later date. If improvements are needed to infrastructure downstream of the project site, the developer may be required to participate and pay into the fair -share agreement currently employed by the City. The fair -share agreement will allow the developer to fund a percentage of the downstream improvement that will be carried out by the City in the future. Therefore, the City has a robust process in place on a project -by -project basisto ensure the sewer system isfunctioning efficiently and will not impact development of any of the Alternative Sites. Water Supply and Distribution The City's Water Utility provides water service within a 27-square-mile service area. The service area includes the City of Santa Ana, and a small neighborhood in the City of Orange, near Tustin Avenue and Fairhaven by the northeast corner of Santa Ana. There are also Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) water lines that serve portions of the city. In addition, Orange County Water District (OCWD) provides recycled water service to portions of the city. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) also has delivery/conveyance lines that run through the city. The City's water system has a total of nine reservoirs with a storage capacity of 49.3 million gallons, 21 groundwater wells, and seven imported water connections. The 2017 Santa Ana Water Master Plan (WMP) is a multi -year capital improvement program to maintain the City's water utility infrastructure systems in sound operable condition and to meet the level of service expectations of the City over the proposed planning period from 2017/2018 to 2039/2040. The WMP analyzed several components of the City's water system, including groundwaterwell rehabilitation needs, reservoir and pump station status, distribution system upgrade needs, and other miscellaneous improvements. Maintaining groundwater wells has been given the highest priority as groundwater supply is more affordable as compared with water supplies purchased from Metropolitan. The results of the water supply analysis indicated that the City's water system has adequate capacity and distribution 5 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT3 capabilities to supply the entire water system demands using only groundwater wells. However, as discussed in the WMP, as of 2017, based on age of the existing pipe, 20 percent (about 560,000 feet of pipe) of the City's distribution system has already past the pipe material's typical useful life. By the end of the proposed planning period (fiscal year 2039/2040), 70 percent (about 1,870,000 feet of pipe) of the City's distribution system will be past the material's lifetime. In summary, while the City's distribution system is robust and hydraulically sound, the system is old and needs to be systematically replaced. The recommended proposed pipeline replacement program is documented in the WMP, in addition to updates from the City's most recent CIP Update and discussions with the City on the status of improvement projects. The City obtains water from two primary sources: local groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin (OC Basin), which is managed by OCWD, and imported water from Metropolitan. The City is a member agency of Metropolitan. Groundwater production accounts for 70 to 77 percent of the water supply and Metropolitan -imported water supplies provide the remaining 23 to 30 percent. The City also receives recycled water from OCWD. Overall, the City has documented that it is 100 percent reliable for a normal year, a single -dry year, and multiple dry year events from 2020 through 2040. Furthermore, the 2015 Metropolitan Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) stated that Metropolitan would be able to meet the demands of its member agencies, including the City of Santa Ana, through 2040. Therefore, imported water demands for the City are projected to be met through the 20-year requirements of SB 610 and beyond. The City of Santa Ana 2015 UWMP also confirmed the ability of the local supplies and the OC Basin to meet the growing demands of the City, posing no water access or distribution issues to any of the Alternative Sites. Dry Utilities All of the Alternative Sites lie within developed areas and have access to full dry utilities, posing no challenges for development. Southern California Edison (SCE) is responsible for providing electric power supply to Santa Ana. SCE is one of the nation's largest electric utilities providing service to more than 15 million people in a 50,000-square-mile area of central, coastal, and Southern California. Natural gas is provided by the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). SoCalGas service area span much of the southern half of California, from Imperial County on the southeast to San Luis Obispo County on the northwest, to part of Fresno County on the north, to Riverside County and most of San Bernardino County on the east. Natural gas is available throughout Santa Ana, and supplies are forecasted to remain constant through 2035. Additional dry utilities include various telecommunications providers and cable providers and solid waste collection. Republic Services provides solid waste collection service to the City, and solid waste is disposed at the Olinda Alpha Landfill in the City of Brea, which is under the operation by the Orange County Waste & Recycling Department. Local and Regional Trends Based on a survey of recent housing development over the past 10 years in Santa Ana and ongoing development applications for housing and mixed -use projects, nearly all consist of redevelopment of sites with existing improvements. Santa Ana is an entirely built out city with very limited vacant land available to accommodate new development of any sort. The City has established a variety of mixed -use zones to accommodate additional residential development in districts and along major corridors. Current development trends in mixed -use areas show that high residential density is feasible and realistic, and ,. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 appropriate to accommodate housing for all income levels. Sites that have been redeveloped include social lodges, religious facilities, office buildings, industrial buildings, older/smaller multi -family residential, and single-family units. The buildings tend to be older than 30 years of age and have been at various levels of physical repair/maintenance. It is of note that many of the office and industrial buildings that underwent or are currently undergoing redevelopment were not in physical distress or economic decline. Rather, the underlying land values presented opportunities to redevelop despite the existing improvements' value. See Table 3 for listing of projects in Santa Ana, which includes previously existing use, age of building, and its location in relation to high qualitytransit areas. Table 3 Mixed -Use and Housing Trends Projects Completed/Under Construction Previously Existing Use/Building Affordability Meets Site Project Address Units Project Description Suitability Status Located on Lower Mod. Above Use Building High g Quality Criteria Age g itTransit ArArea Demolition of two (2) office/commercial buildings (approximately 64,713 square feet) and Meets E. 552 547 -- 5 construction of a mixed- Office/com Criteria 2, Complete use development with mercial 1970 No Criteria 4, Frst St. First 552 multi -family buildings and Criteria residential units and 5 10,000 square feet of commercial space. Demolition of a social lodge building (approximately 38,379 square feet) and Meets 1660 E. First St. 603 -- -- 603 construction of a mixed- Social lodge 1963 No Criteria 2, Criteria 4, Complete use development with building 603 multi -family and Criteria residential units and 5 ,900 square feet of commercial space. Demolition of three industrial buildings (approximately 154,096 square feet) and Meets construction of a mixed- Vacant Ind Criteria 2, 2300 S. Redhill 1,100 -- -- 1,100 use development with 1979 No Criteria 4, Complete Ave. 1,100 multi -family ustrial Criteria 5, residential units and buildings and Criteria approximately 80,000 6 q ua re feet of ommercial space. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Previously Existing Use/Building Affordability Meets Site Project Address Units Project Description Suitability Status Located on Lower Mod. Above Use Building High Quality Criteria Age Transit Area Meets Construction of 309 Criteria 2, 2800 N. Main St. 309 -- -- 309 multi -family residential Yes Criteria 3, Complete units. Parking lot Criteria 4, and Criteria 6 Demolition of religious facility and the Meets construction of a mixed- Criteria 2, *301 E. Santa 93 92 1 use development with 93 Religious 1969 Yes Criteria 3, Complete Ana Blvd. multi -family residential facility Criteria 4, units and 2,722 square and Criteria feet of commercial 5 space. Construction of a Meets two-story Vacant/ Criteria 2, *801 E. Santa 17 16 -- 1 building with 17 Two single- Criteria 3, Complete Ana Blvd. flats/apartment family 1913 Yes Criteria 4, units and residences Criteria 5, and Criteria covered parking. 6 Demolish duplex Meets and subdivide Single- Criteria 3, 1513 Civic 8 8 site into four family Criteria 4, Complete Center Dr. lots, each residence 1966 Yes Criteria 5, proposed with and Duplex and Criteria two units. 6 Demolition of Meets 301 N. Mountain two detached single-family Two single- Criteria 3, Under View St. g __ __ g residences and family y 1959 Yes Criteria 4, Criteria 5, Construction construct eight residences and units. Criteria 6 -imitates an arroruawe rousing Pruiece. A survey of housing and mixed -use projects built, under construction, or approved in the neighboring cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove, and Westminster shows a similar trend of development happening on sites with existing improvements. See Table 4 for a listing of recently built, under construction, or approved housing or mixed -use projects in neighboring jurisdictions. This table also identifies built affordable housing in neighboring jurisdictions. The prior property conditions of non -vacant sites that were recently developed into new residential and mixed -use projects within the region signify a trend that can be used for selecting other sites suitable for redevelopment in Santa Ana. These include a range of building conditions and existing land uses. The sites previous uses consisted primarily of commercial, industrial and/or residential uses. Many of the sites include commercial buildings such as used car dealerships, restaurants, car washes, industrial warehouse, offices, religious facilities, single-family A Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT residences, and parking lots. These uses are also consistent with uses that were redeveloped locally in Santa Ana. Table 4 Regional Mixed -Use and Housing Trends Recently Affordability Approved/Under Residential Previous Existing Use Before Development Construction Mixed Units Lower Mod. Above and Building Age Mod. Use Project Address Used vehicle dealership (building over 40 1600 W. Lincoln Ave., _ 315 years old) Anaheim 315 Restaurant and carwash (buildings over 50 2970W. Lincoln Ave., -- 134 years old) Anaheim 134 Industrial/warehouse (buildingover30 19105. Union St., _ 332 years old) Anaheim 332 Office building, small retail shopping center, and large format retail store (buildings 1011-1091 N. Tustin _- 406 between 20 and 30 years old) Ave., Anaheim 406 1623 W. CerrltosAve., Single-family residence 57 -- -- 57 Anaheim Office complex (buildingover30years 2301-2331 W. Lincoln _- 152 old) Ave., Anaheim 152 12901 Lewis St., Church/religious facility and school 70 -- -' 70 Garden Grove Garden Grove United Methodist Church *10861 Acacia and church operated pre-school and the Pkwy., Garden 47 47 __ __ Head Start pre-school program Grove Freestanding restaurant 11222 Garden Grove Blvd., 16 "" '- 16 Garden Grove Restaurant and Automotive *12811 Garden buildings/uses Grove Blvd., 93 93 -- -- Garden Grove Commercial businesses and parking lot * 14800 Beach (buildings over 50 years old) Blvd., 50 49 -- 1 Westminster Ordinance No. NS-3076 ATTACHMENT Recently Approved/Under Residential Affordability Previous Existing Use Before Development Above Construction Mixed Units Lower Mod. and Building Age Mod. Use Project Address Furniture store (buildings over 50 years *7122 old) Westminster 65 64 -- 1 Blvd., Westminster -indicates an attoroable housing project. Lot Consolidation Development Record Lot consolidation, the process of combining multiple adjacent lots into a single larger parcel to facilitate development, is a common practice in built -out cities like Santa Ana. As discussed above, Santa Ana is an entirely built out city with very limited vacant land available to accommodate new development of any sort. Nearly all multi -family housing development projects consist of the consolidation of contiguous lots and the redevelopment of sites with existing improvements. Table 5 provides examples of recent development projects in Santa Ana that required lot consolidation, demonstrating its feasibility and effectiveness as a tool for promoting development in the city. Moreover, as these examples illustrate, lot consolidation is not a constraint to housing production in Santa Ana, rather, is a feature intrinsic to development in highly urbanized areas. Table 5 Example Projects that Required Lot Consolidation Number of Total Affordability Very Low Moderate Project Name Project Address Parcels Number Project status Consolidated of Units Low 815 N. Harbor Andalucia Blvd./816 N. 7 70 Constructed Figueroa St. (2017) Crossroads 1126 E. Constructed Washington Washington Washington 2 86 85 (2024) Ave Legacy Square 609 N. Spurgeon 2 93 75 17 Constructed (2023) 401 N. Main Constructed Rafferty St./500 N. Bush 10 220 11 St. (strut 2024) 2530 W. The Arches Westminster 2 85 84 Constructed Ave. (2024) FX Residences 801 E. Santa Ana 4 17 16 Under Blvd. Construction WISEPlace 1411 N. 2 48 47 Under Broadway Construction Son! 1202 E. Third St. 2 2 Under Construction 10 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Affordability Number of Total Very Low Moderate Project Name Project Address Parcels Number Project Status Consolidated of Units Low First and Harbor Mixed- 101 N. Harbor 12 183 28 Entitled Use Blvd. Development Cabrillo Under Crossing 1814 E. First St. 2 35 4 Construction Townhomes Broadway 1412 N. Constructed Live -Work Broadway 2 3 (2024) Development Duplexand 2246 S. Cypress 4 4 Pre Two ADU Ave. Entitlement General Plan Focus Areas Santa Ana's Focus Areas, as defined in the General Plan, are strategically located throughout the city along major arterials with access to high quality public transportation and link the City's existing form -based code areas. The Focus Areas provide opportunities to develop a breadth of housing types at densities ranging from 20 to 125 dwelling units per acre by right, and stand to address the diverse housing needs of the community. These areas, characterized by existing, under construction, and planned infrastructure and growth potential, are envisioned as mixed -use hubs combining residential, commercial, and recreational elements. A detailed description of each Focus Area can be found on the interactive General Plan website (httr)s•//general-plan-santa-ana-ca proudcity com/ j. The Focus Areas have already begun to experience rapid change and increased opportunity for residents. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area parallels the OC Streetcar route, Orange County's first modern streetcar that will run 4.15 miles and connect to the regional train network by way of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, offering multi -modal mobility options and residential development opportunities along the streetcar stations. The OC Streetcar is slated to be completed and operational in 2025. The Related Bristol Specific Plan was approved October 2024 in the South Bristol Focus Area, effectuating the vision for the Focus Area outlined in the General Plan. At buildout, Bristol Related will accommodate up to 3,750 residential units, a 250-room hotel, a 200-unit tower for senior living, and up to 350,000 square feet of restaurants and shops, as well as a grocery store and 13 acres of park space. Additionally, the City has contracted the services of Torti Gallas + Associates to draft five public realm plans, one for each Focus Area, to ensure infrastructure, pedestrian, bicyclist, and recreational needs are being met in the Focus Areas. This approach will fosters walkable environments with easy access to essential services and amenities, providing a high quality of life for all residents, including lower -income individuals residing in existing residences orfuture residents that will occupy units in future developments within these areas. As such, the Focus Areas are the ideal location for new residential development, opportunity, and housing mobility. Specific Plan, Specific Development, and Overlay Zone Areas 11 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 The Citys specific plan, specific development, and overlay zone areas are connected to the General Plan Focus Areas, and are generally located along major arterials with public transportation options, such as the OC Streetcar, the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, and some of the only rapid bus routes in Orange County offered by the Orange County Transportation Authority. All of these areas have been planned for high density housing and will foster walkable environments with easy access to essential services and amenities, providing a high quality of life for all residents, including lower -income individuals residing in existing residences or future residents that will occupy units in future developments within these areas. These areas have also seen the most investment in terms of development within the City over the five years. As such, the specific plan, specific development, and overlay areas are the ideal location for new residential development, opportunity, and housing mobility. Figure 1: General Plan Focus Areas, Specific Development, and Overlay Zone Areas General Plan Focus Areas I Specific Plan/Specific Development/ Overlays 12 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Criteria for Selecting Alternative Sites for AB 2011- Affordable The following suitability criteria was used to identify parcels listed in Table 6 under the Meets Suitability Criteria column: 1. AB 2011 Site Criteria: AB 2011 requires that alternative sites comply with Government Code Sec. 65912.111(b) through (f). 2. Opportunity Areas: Opportunity areas are sites located within a Specific Plan area or a General Plan Focus Area. The City has a made a concerted effort over the past 10 years to foster development activity, the creation of community amenities, and public service improvements into these areas. These areas stand to provide improved access to opportunities into the future. 3. Access to Public Transit: Site is located within a high qualitytransit area. 4. Existing Use: Uses that are similar to those that have been previously recycled in surrounding communities (e.g., industrial uses, shopping centers and retail stores, office complexes, standalone restaurants and retail uses, and single-family buildings). 5. Year: Structure was built prior to 1985 (over 40 years of age), making redevelopment of the site more probable. 6. Building/Land Value: Property improvement value is less than half of the land value (ratio is less than 1.00). AB 2011 (Affordable) requires that all alternative sites comply with Government Code Sec. 65912.111(b) through (f). All sites identified in Table 6 below have been reviewed by HCD staff and determined to comply with the aforementioned Government Code section. The detailed site and environmental criteria analysis of the alternative sites is provided separately. The alternative sites are within or near a specific plan area or General Plan Focus Area. These areas have been identified by the City for higher intensity development. These areas are also undergoing significant levels of reinvestment from both the City and the private sector. As such, they are opportune sites for redevelopment. Moreover, these areas provide housing opportunities for lower income residents in close proximity to amenities, jobs, resources, and mobility options. Alternative sites were also selected based on proximity to public transportation options. Housing near transit can be beneficial for low-income residents by allowing them to live in areas with opportunities without the costs of car ownership. Key sites with existing uses that are ripe for redevelopment typically contain older structures and are underutilized given the development potential afforded by the mixed -use development standards. Examples of existing uses on alternative sites include commercial uses, office, auto sales lots, structures with large surface parking lots, and single family residences. These align with uses identified in Table 3 and Table 4 which list housing/mixed-use projects in the City and region, Including affordable housing, which have recently been entitled, are under construction, or completed. The average building ageforthe sites is over 65 years old. The lifespa n of a commercial building on average ranges from 50 to 60 years, depending on the preservation techniques employed by the owner and the 13 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT way the building is utilized. Most commercial buildings need an overhaul after 20 or more years to keep the building in suitable condition. Determining whether reinvestment to the properties has occurred recently involves reviewing both the building -to -land value ratio and building age. The ratio is calculated bycomparingthe building improvement value (thevalue of improvements to the structure of the building) to the land value. These numbers are derived from the Orange County Assessor Department and are the assessed values for determining property taxes. To calculate assessed property values, all building improvement information from jurisdictions are sent to the Orange County Assessor Department during the building permitting process. If the building -to -land value ratio is less than one, it means that the building improvements are worth less than the property value. If building improvements are relatively new or the building is newer, typically a building -to- land value ratio can easily go above 2.0 to as high as 10.0. If the ratio is below one, or even below 0.5, it is a clear sign that there has not been recent building improvements to improve the condition. If the property has a low building -to -land value ratio with building over 50 years old, it is likely that building has not improved and deterioration may be occurring to structure, including to the fayade, decline of the roof, and equipment and services (e.g., space and heating, ductwork, electrical work, etc.). Table 6 summarizes the sites identified as alternative parcels, which can facilitate a total surplus capacity of 5,853 units. It also identifies if the site meets the suitability criteria for non -vacant sites. These sites comply with AB 2011 site criteria, are located with opportunity areas, have access to publictransportation, contain existing commercial and/or residential uses that are of marginal economic viability, are at or near the end of their useful life, and/or the existing intensity of development is substantially lowerthan allowed by existing zoning. The criteria thresholds selected are based on regional trends for redevelopment of residential and mixed -use development. Additionally, sites that are smaller than 0.5 acres have multiple parcels that are adjacent to each other and are appropriate for consolidation into larger development projects, achieving a lot size of at least 0.5 acres. These sites have common ownership, function as a part of a larger site currently, such as a commercial building with an adjacent parking lot, and/or are significantly underutilized and have been identified for potential projects. For the purpose of calculating the net surplus capacity as shown in Table 6, individual parcels that make up a larger development site were aggregated and assigned a site identifier expressed by a number. The site identifier is shown in the column on the far left of Table 6 titled Lot Consolidation. These are sites that would require lot consolidation to occurto develop at the rates expressed in the table. Those parcels that do not have a Lot Consolidation number, could be developed without lot consolidation and do not include a Lot Consolidation number. The City's General Plan Land Use Element indicates that when calculating the number of units permitted on a site based on permitted residential densities, the total number of units permitted shall be rounded down in any case where a fraction of a unit is permissible. For sites with a Lot Consolidation number, the total area of each parcel comprising the development site was aggregated before being multiplied bythe permitted density. The product of the density calculation was then rounded down, as is required by the City's General Plan, and included in the Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated and round down) column. MainPlace Mall Site The net surplus capacities for the MainPlace Mall site, Affordable Alternative/Upzoned Map ID Nos. 19- 25 and Mixed -Income Alternative/Upzoned Map ID Nos. 18-24 in Table 6 and Table 7 below, utilize a 14 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT3 similar approach outlined above. The total area of each parcel comprising the development site was aggregated before being multiplied by the permitted density. The product of the density calculation was then rounded down, as is required by the City's General Plan, and included in the Net Surplus Capacity. However, three of the seven parcels that make up the site (Affordable Alternative/Upzoned Map ID Nos. 20, 22, and 25; and Mixed -Income Alternative/Upzoned Map ID Nos. 19, 21, and 24) are entirely within the 500-foot freeway buffer. While AB 2011 does not permit housing to be developed within this area, the unit capacities derived by calculating the lot size multiplied by the base density allowances can be accommodated elsewhere on the development site, which includes approximately 27 acres of land that is outside of the freeway buffer area, that if developed alone at the base density of 90 dwelling units per acre could yield approximately 2,430 units at minimum. Through site planning and design, the site can be developed in accordance with AB 2011. Moreover, a majority of the site is owned by one entity and it largely functions as part of integrated center currently. As such, the parcels within the freeway buffer that are part of the MainPlace Mall site will be included in Table 6 and Table 7 below, as part of the calculations for the integrated development site and identified with a Lot Consolidation number. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 6 AB 2011 -Affordable Alternative Sites Net Surplus Ca aci (consolidated Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Existing Use Zone GP GP Max. Densi (units/acre) Builge Building/Land and Meets Suitability Criteria Parcel Size acres Designation Awe Value Value and rounded down 70 005-184-01 SP3 DC-1 90 47 Meets 0.17 71 005-184-02 SP3 DC-1 90 47 0.17 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, Criteria 3, Criteria 4, 72 005-184-03 SP3 DC-1 90 74 014 73 005-184-04 SP3 DC-1 90 56 0.15 77 005-184-14 SP3 DC-1 90 56 0.15 10 Parking Lot 0.002 Criteria 5, 113 and Criteria 6; buildings 78 005-184-15 SP3 DC-1 90 60 0.15 82 005-184-29 SP3 DC-1 90 between 47 and 74 years 0.16 old 83 005-184-30 SP3 DC-1 90 56 0.17 76 005-184-10 SP3 DC-1 90 94 Meets 0.32 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, Criteria 3, 20 005-184-25 Office SP3 DC-1 90 101 0.76 Criteria 4, Criteria 5, 0.64 86 and Criteria 6; buildings over 94 79 years old 940 398-455-02 R2 UN-40 40 114 Meets 0.15 941 398-455-03 R2 UN-40 40 42 0.15 Criteria 1, 942 398-455-04 R2 UN-40 40 112 0.14 Religious Criteria 2, 21 Facility/Multiple Detached 0.11 Criteria 3, Criteria 4, 34 943 398-455-05 R2 UN-40 40 61 0.13 944 398-455-06 R2 UN-40 40 123 0.07 Residential Units Criteria 5, 945 398-455-07 R2 UN-40 40 62 and Criteria 0.07 6; buildings 946 398-455-08 R2 UN-40 40 58 0.13 16 Ordinance No. NS-3075 Lot MAP Consolidation ID I ATTACHMENT TABLE 6 AB 2011 - Affordable AI GP Max. GP Buildin¢ APN Existing Use ZoneDensity Designation unitsnits/acrel Agee Building/Land Meets Parcel Value Suitability Size Criteria acres Net Surplus 947 398-455-09 R2 UN-40 40 104 over42 years old 0.13 948 398-45S-10 R2 UN-40 40 116 0.14 949 398-455-11 R2 UN-40 40 116 0.28 74 005-184-07 SP3 DC-1 90 69 Meets Criteria 0.17 1,Criteria 2, Criteria 3, 30 005-184-08 Office SP3 DC-1 90 64 0.51 Criteria 4, Criteria 5, 0.49 59 and Criteria 6; buildings over 64 75 1 1 years old 953 398-456-04 R2 UN-40 40 Meets 0.14 Criteria 1,Criteria 2, 954 398-456-05 R2 UN-40 40 120 0.14 955 398-456-06 R2 UN-40 40 120 0.14 31 Religious Facility/Detached Residential Unit 0.04 Criteria 3, Criteria 4, Criteria a and Criteria 32 956 398-456-07 R2 UN-40 40 108 0.14 957 398-456-08 R2 UN-40 40 109 0.13 6; buildings 398-456-09 R2 UN-40 40 114 over 108 0.13 958 1 1 years old 84 005-185-27 SP3 DC-1 90 102 Meets 0.28 Criteria 86 005-185-34 SP3 DC-1 90 100 S,Criteria 2, 0.65 40 Office/School 1.93 Criteria 3,188 Criteria 4, Criteria 5, and Criteria 87 005-185-37 SP3 DC-1 90 46 6; buildings 1.16 17 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 6 AB 2011 - Affordable Alternative Sites Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Existing Use Zone GP GP Max. Density (units/acre) Building Building/Land Meets Suitability Criteria Parcel Size acres Designation Age Value and rounded dow over 46 years old 1025 398-562-01 SP3 DC-1 90 53 Meets 1.55 Criteria 1,Criteria 2, Criteria 3, 41 Office 7.13 Criteria 4, 144 and Criteria 5; buildings over53 1026 1 398-562-02 SP3 I DC-1 90 54 years old 0.06 88 007-161-02 R2 CR-30 30 57 0.13 89 007-161-03 R2 CR-30 30 1 107 0.13 90 007-161-04 R2 CR-30 30 99 0.13 Meets 91 007-161-05 R2 CR-30 30 79 0.14 Criteria 50 Multiple Detached Residential Units 0.29 1,Criteria 2, Criteria 3, Criteria 4, Criteria rera 5, and Criteria 21 92 007-161-06 R2 CR-30 30 58 0.14 93 007-161-07 R2 CR-30 30 101 0.05 94 007-161-08 R2 CR-30 30 62 0.08 95 007-161-09 R2 CR-30 30 74 6; buildings 0.13 96 007-161-10 R2 CR-30 30 52 0.13 over52 97 007-161-11 R2 CR-30 30 102 0.14 years old 98 007-161-12 R2 CR-30 30 98 0.13 99 007-161-13 R2 CR-30 30 74 0.13 1027 398-562-06 SP3 DC-1 90 64 Meets 0.67 51 School/Parkin g Lots 3.15 Criteria 1,Criteria 2, Criteria 3, 229 1028 398-562-09 SP3 DC-1 90 62 0.38 1029 398-562-10 SP3 DC-1 90 54 Criteria 4, 1.5 18 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 6 AB 2011 - Attordable Alternative Saes Lot Consolidation MAP ID Existing Use Zone GP Designation GP Max. Densi (units/acre) BuildinL�Building/LandAPN Meets Suitability Criteria Parcel Size acres Net Sur I Ca aci consolid and roue down Agee and Criteria 5; buildings over 54 years old 60 105 007-163-02 1 Multiple Detached Residential Units R2 CR-30 30 106 025 Meets Criteria 1,Criteria 2, 3, Criteria 4, Criteria 5, and Criteria 6; buildings over46 years old 0.14 36 106 007-163-03 R2 CR-30 30 56 0.14 107 007-163-04 R2 CR-30 30 76 0.13 108 007-163-05 R2 CR-30 30 61 0.13 109 007-163-07 R2 CR-30 30 57 0.15 110 007-163-08 R2 CR-30 30 46 0.14 111 007-163-10 R2 CR-30 30 114 0.13 112 007-163-11 R2 CR-30 30 63 0.13 113 007-163-12 R2 R2 CR-30 30 112 0.13 114 007-163-13 R2 CR-30 30 101 0.13 115 007-163-14 R2 CR-30 30 99 0.15 116 007-163-15 R2 CR-30 30 78 0.13 117 007-163-16 R2 CR-30 30 99 0.13 118 007-163-17 R2 CR-30 30 97 0.14 119 007-163-18 R2 CR-30 30 107 0.15 120 007-163-19 R2 CR-30 30 95 0.13 121 007-163-21 R2 CR-30 30 112 0.15 122 007-163-22 R2 CR-30 30 67 0.13 70 100 007-162-01 Religious Facility/Multiple R2 CR-30 30 101 0.61 Meets Criteria 1,Criteria 2, 0.28 12 101 007-162-03 R2 CR-30 30 102 0.14 102 007-162-04 R2 CR-30 30 84 0.11 19 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 6 AB 2011 - Affordable Alternative Sites Net Surplus Capad ci (consolidated Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Existing Use Zone GP GP Max. Density (units/acre) Building Building/Land Meets Suitability Criteria Parcel Siz e acres Designation g Value and rounded down 2 Criteria 3, 0.17 103 007-162-05 Detached R2 CR-30 30 34 Residential Units Criteria 4, Criteria 5, 007-162-06 R2 CR-30 30 52 and Criteria 6; buildings 0.14 nearorover 104 40 years old 123 007-164-01 R2 CR-30 30 37 Meets 0.29 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 124 007-164-02 R2 CR-30 30 24 0.14 80 007-164-03 Multiple Detached Residential Units R2 CR-30 30 101 0.56 Criteria 3, Criteria 4, and Criteria 6; buildings 0.14 8 nearorover 30 years old 125 or 128 007-183-01 R1 UN-30 30 23 Meets 0.15 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 129 007-183-02 R1 UN-30 30 23 0.15 130 007-183-03 RI UN-30 30 104 0.15 90 Multiple Detached Residential Units 0.34 Criteria 3, Criteria 4, Criteria 5, and Criteria 17 131 007-183-04 R1 UN-30 30 23 0.15 007-183-05 R1 UN-30 30 102 6; buildings 0.15 near100 132 years old 1279 405-176-01 R3 CR-30 30 32 Meets 0.52 91 Multiple Detached 0.52 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 35 1280 405-176-02 R2 CR-30 30 101 0.14 1281 405-176-03 Residential Units R2 CR-30 30 76 Criteria 3, 0.14 182 4205-176-04 R2 CR-30 30 84 0.14 Criteria 4, NO] Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 6 AB 2011 -Affordable Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Existing Use Zone GP Designation GP Max. Density units acre Buildin Building/Land Meets Suitability Parcel Size (acresl Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated Age Value Criteria and rounded down 1283 405-176-05 R2 CR-30 30 59 Criteria 5, and Criteria 6; most buildings near100 years old 0.14 1284 405-176-06 R2 CR-30 30 101 0.14 1285 405-176-07 R2 CR-30 30 101 0.14 1286 405-176-08 R2 CR-30 30 103 0.14 1287 405-176-09 R2 CR-30 30 78 0.14 1288 405-176-10 R2 CR-30 30 101 0.14 1289 405-176-11 R2 CR-30 30 102 0.14 1290 405-176-12 R2 CR-30 30 102 0.14 1291 405-176-13 R2 CR-30 30 101 0.14 1292 405-176-14 R2 CR-30 30 10 0.14 100 133 007-183-10 Multiple Detached Residential Units R2 UN-30 30 106 0.31 Meets Criteria 1, Criteria 2, Criteria 3, Criteria 4, Criteria 5, and Criteria 6; buildings over50 years old 0.15 15 134 007-183-22 R2 UN-30 30 55 0.15 135 007-183-13 R2 UN-30 30 95 0.15 136 007-183-14 R2 UN-30 30 126 0.15 137 007-183-15 R2 UN-30 30 47 0.15 138 007-183-19 R2 UN-30 30 69 0.15 139 007-183-20 R2 UN-30 30 61 0.15 110 147 007-201-04 Multiple Detached Residential Units R2 CR-30 30 112 0.14 Meets Criteria 1, Criteria 2, Criteria 3, Criteria 4, Criteria 5, and Criteria 1 6; buildings 0.14 9 148 007-201-06 R2 CR-30 30 77 0.11 149 007-201-07 R2 CR-30 30 99 0.11 151 007-201-17 R2 CR-30 30 100 0.14 152 007-201-18 R2 CR-30 30 100 0.14 21 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 6 AB 2011 - Affordable Alternative Sites Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Existing Use Zone GP GP Max. DensitySuitability (units/acre) Building Building/Land Meets Criteria Parcel Size acres Designation Age Value and rounded down over 75 years old 174 008-082-16 R2 UN-30 30 104 Meets 0.14 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 175 008-082-17 R2 UN-30 30 111 0.14 Multiple Criteria 3, 120 Detached 0.06 Criteria 4, 6 176 008-082-18 Residential Units R2 UN-30 30 111 Criteria 5; 014 buildings aver 100 years old Meets Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 1Z4 1339 412-031-03 Multiple -family Residential R4 UN-30 30 54 0.57 Criteria 3, Criteria 5, and Criteria 5.64 84 6; building over50 ears old 183 008-091-01 SPl UN-30 30 0.27 Meets Criteria 1, 184 008-091-02 SP3 UN-30 30 0.15 185 008-091-03 R2 UN-30 30 100 Criteria 2, 0.15 186 008-091-04 R2 UN-30 30 112 0.15 130 Vacant/Multiple Detached Residential Units 0.40 Criteria 3, Criteria 4, Criteria 5, and Criteria 57 187 008-091-05 R2 UN-30 30 10 0.15 188 008-091-06 R2 UN-30 30 111 0.15 189 008-091-14 SPi UN-30 30 0.15 6; buildings near 100 190 008-091-15 SPS UN-30 30 108 years old 0.15 191 008-091-16 SP1 UN-30 30 110 0.15 22 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 6 92011 _ Afford We Mternarhm Cit-I ,JetS-IVw Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Existing Use Zone GP Designation GP Max. DensitySuitability units acre BuildingBuilding/Land Meets Parcel Size acres Capaci consolid and round Age Value Criteria 30 SP1 UN-30 63 down. 192 008-091-17 0.15 193 008-091-18 SPl UN-30 30 87 0.15 194 008-091-19 R2 UN-30 30 114 0.15 342 011-154-20 R3 UN-40 40 65 Meets 0.28 343 011-154-21 R3 UN-40 40 41 0.26 Criteria 1, 344 011-154-22 R3 UN-40 40 44 0.37 Criteria 2, 140 Multiple -family Residential 0.31 Criteria and Criteria a 113 345 011-154-23 R3 UN-40 40 67 0.32 346 011-154-24 R3 UN-40 40 65 0.72 6; buildings 347 011-154-25 R3 UN-40 40 67 over40 0.65 years old 348 011-154-33 R3 UN-40 40 52 0.24 Meets 20 002-210-48 SP4 DC-2.1 90 Criteria 1, 4.48 Criteria 2, 22 002-221-30 SP4 DC-2.1 90 34 3.28 174 Commercial 0.09 Criteria 3, 983 and Criteria 25 002-222-01 SP4 DC-2.1 90 6; building 3.17 34 years old 555 398-015-01 SP3 DC-1 90 111 Meets 0.13 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 556 398-015-02 SP3 DC-1 90 73 0.13 557 398-015-03 SP3 DC-1 90 59 0.13 Criteria 3, 190 Office 3.09 Criteria 4, 123 Criteria 5; 558 398-015-04 SP3 DC-1 90 58 buildings 0.98 near or over 60 years old 564 398-022-10 SP3 DC-1 90 102 Meets 0.91 200 Of lice 0.33 Criteria 1, 153 1359 398-022-12 SP3 DC-1 90 63 Criteria 2, 0.8 23 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 6 AB 2011- Affordable Alternative Sites Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated and rounded Lot Consolidation MAP ID APN Existing Use Zone GP GP Max. Density (units/acre) Building Building/Land Meets Suitability Parcel Size acres Designation Age Value Criteria down Criteria 3, Criteria 4, Criteria 5, and Criteria 6; buildings over 60 years old 652 398-231-01 SP3 DC-1 90 94 Meets 0.13 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 653 398-231-02 SP3 DC-1 90 89 0.13 654 398-231-03 SP3 DC-1 90 66 0.13 Criteria 3, 655 398-231-06 SP3 DC-1 90 118 0.22 220 Office and Commercial 042 Criteria 4, Criteria 5, 113 656 398-231-07 SP3 DC-1 90 and Criteria 0.22 6; buildings 657 398-231-08 SP3 DC-1 90 39 0.43 over 65 years old 85 005-185-29 SP3 DC-1 90 68 Meets 1.25 Criteria 1, 686 398-244-01 SP3 DC-1 90 Criteria 2, 0.2 Criteria 3, 230 Commercial 1.97 Criteria 4, 157 Criteria 5; 687 398-244-02 SP3 DC-1 90 107 buildings 0.3 over 65 years old 889 398-384-09 R2 UN-40 1 40 1 62 1 Meets 0.26 240 Vacant 0.01 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, Criteria 3, 20 890 398-384-11 R2 UN-40 40 51 0.14 891 398-354-12 R2 UN-40 40 111 0.14 Criteria 4, 892 398-384-15 R2 UN-40 40 Criteria 5, 0.28 24 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 6 ARJntt-Cffnrdah I Auprnativp Sitpc Net Surplus Ca aci (consolidated Lot MAP Zone GP GP Max. Buildin Building/Land Meets Suitability Parcel APN Existing Use Density Size Age Value Criteria and Criteria and rounded Consolidation ID Designation (units/acre) acres AL down 6; buildings over 50 years old Meets 80 005-184-26 ParkLot SP3 DC-1 90 22 2.36 Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 0.87 78 Criteria 3 Meets Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 81 005-184-27 Office SP3 DC-1 90 76 1.06 Criteria 3, 0.81 72 Criteria 4, Criteria 5; buildingover 75yearsold ' Meets Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 153 007-201-28 Residential R2 CR-30 30 10 0.68 Criteria 3, 0.12 1 Criteria 4, and Criteria 6 Meets Criteria 1, 340 011-154-01 Commercial C2 UN-40 40 64 1.01 Criteria 2, 0,49 19 Criteria 4; building over 60 years old 352 011-154-43 Mu Id[ SD89 UN-40 40 5 2.83 Meets 2,16 86 Residential Criteria 1 25 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 6 AB 2011 - Affordable Alternative Sites Net Surplus Ca aci Lot MAP GP GP Max. Building Building/Land Meets Parcel Consolidation ID APN Existing Use Zone Density Suitability Size (consolidated Designation I�je Value (units/acre) Criteria acres and rounded down and Criteria 2 Meets Criteria 1, Multiple -family Criteria 2, 547 396-361-02 R4 UN-30 30 54 4.84 Criteria 4, 6.35 146 Residential Criteria 5; building over 50 years old Meets Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 551 398-011-01 Office SP3 DC-1 90 75 4.41 Criteria 3, 1.96 176 Criteria 4, Criteria 5; building over 75 years old Meets Criteria 1, Criteria 2, Criteria 3, 563 398-021-01 Mortuary SP3 DC-1 90 99 0.74 Criteria 5 0.76 68 and Criteria 6; building near100 years old Meets Criteria 1, 1125 402-222-04 Office R3 DC-3 90 1 0.00 Criteria 2, 3.96 356 Criteria 4, and Criteria 6 26 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE AB 2D11 -AtlorOaoie Alternative bites ' SINEW Net Surplus Capacity (consolidated Lot MAP Zone GP GP Max. Buildin Building/Land Meets Suitability Parcel APN Existing Use Density Size Age Value Criteria and rounded Consolidation ID Designation (units/acre) acres down Meets Criteria 1, Criteria 2, 430-221-14 Commercial M1 DC-2 90 39 1.06 Criteria 4, 2.79 251 Criteria 5; building near 1347 40 years old Meets Criteria 1, 005-185-30 Live/Work and SP3 DC-1 90 59 3.00 Criteria 2, 1.36 122 Parking Lot Criteria 3; buildingover immmm 1394 1 1 1 55 years old 27 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Criteria for Selecting Alternative Sites for AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative sites for AB 2011—Mixed-Income can support market rate multi -family development at ranges between 30 and 125 dwelling units per acre. Alternative sites for AB 2011 - Mixed -Income are located within or near a specific plan area or General Plan Focus Area. These areas have been identified by the City for higher intensity development. These areas are also undergoing significant levels of reinvestment from both the City and the private sector. As such, they are opportune sites for redevelopment. Moreover, these areas provide housing opportunities for lower income residents in close proximity to amenities, jobs, resources, and mobility options. AB 2011 (Mixed -Income) requires that all alternative sites comply with Government Code Sec. 65912.121(b) through (f). All sites identified in Table 7 below have been reviewed by HCD staff and determined to comply with the aforementioned Government Code section. A detailed site and environmental criteria analysis of the alternative sites is provided separately. 28 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Existing Use Zone GP Max. GP Densi Designation units acre Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Density Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated Site 6 534 398-235-03 Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 19.2 19 535 398-235-04 SD84 DC-3 90 1 0.13 80 536 398-235-05 SD84 DC-3 90 0.21 80 7 398-334-01 Detached Residential Units SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 844 84 398-334-02 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 398-334-05 SD84 UN-30 30 0.43 8o P706 398-334-07 SD84 UN-30 30 0.72 80 8 398-591-08 Parking Lot/Commercial SD84 DC-3 90 0.09 80 19.2 19 398-591-09 SD84 DC-3 90 0.17 80 869 398-591-10 SD84 DC-3 90 0.22 80 10 63 005-184-01 Parking Lot SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 80 113.4 113 64 005-184-02 SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 80 65 005-184-03 SP3 DC-1 90 0.14 80 66 005-184-04 SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 80 70 005-184-14 SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 80 71 005-184-15 SP3 DC-1 90 0.15 80 75 005-184-29 SP3 DC-1 90 0.16 80 76 005-184-30 SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 80 17 707 398-337-01 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 35 35 E9 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID A=N 398-337-02 Existing Use 4 Parking Lots/Detached Residential Units Zone GP Designation GP Max. Densi Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Density Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capad Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated units acrel Site 708 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 709 398-337-03 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 710 398-337-04 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 711 398-337-05 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 18 879 398-593-07 Office SD84 DC-3 90 0.43 80 26 26 880 398-593-08 SD84 DC-3 90 0.22 80 20 69 005-184-10 Lodge/Office SP3 DC-1 90 0.32 80 86.4 86 72 1 005-184-25 SP3 DC-1 90 0.64 80 21 818 398-455-01 Religious Facility/Detached Residential Units C2 UN-40 40 0.49 80 167.15 167 819 398-455-02 R2 UN-40 40 0.15 80 820 398-455-03 RZ UN-40 40 0.15 80 821 398-455-04 R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 822 398-455-05 R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 823 398-455-06 R2 UN-40 40 0.07 80 824 398-455-07 R2 UN-40 40 0.07 80 825 398-455-08 R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 826 398-455-09 R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 827 398-455-10 R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 828 398-455-11 R2 UN-40 40 0.28 80 829 398-455-16 C2 UN-40 40 0.47 80 26 541 1 398-237-01 SD84 UN-30 30 0.44 80 67.5 67 9K Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites W542 APN Existin¢ Use Zone SD84 GP Desi¢nation GP Max. Densi Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Densi Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacityunits Rounded Ca aci (Consolidated acreDown UN-30 Site 398-237-02 Hall/Detached Residential 30 0.13 80 543 398-237-03 SD84 UN-30 30 0.06 80 544 398-237-04 SD84 UN-30 30 0.20 80 545 398-237-05 SD84 UN-30 30 0.52 80 27 712 398-338-01 Detached Residential Unit SD84 UN-30 30 0.09 80 75 7 713 398-338-09 SD84 UN-30 30 0.06 80 28 895 400-041-04 Office/Parking Lots P DC-3 90 2.01 60 267.3 267 896 400.041-OS P DC-3 90 0.96 30 30 67 005-184-07 Office SP3 DC-1 90 0.17 80 59.4 59 68 005-184-09 SP3 DC-1 90 0.49 80 31 830 398-456-02 Religious Facility/Detached Residential Units C2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 91.2 91 831 398-456-03 C2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 832 398-456-04 R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 833 398-456-05 R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 834 398-456-06 R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 835 398-456-07 R2 UN-40 40 0.14 80 836 398-456-08 R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 837 398-456-09 R2 UN-40 40 0.13 80 841 398-456-19 C2 UN-40 40 0.05 80 37 727 398-371-15 SD84 UN-30 30 0.19 80 127.5 127 31 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Existing Use Zone GP Designation GP Max. Densi Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Densi Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated units acre Site 728 398-371-16 Multiple Detached Residential Units SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 729 398-371-17 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 730 398-371-18 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 731 398-371-19 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 732 398-371-20 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 733 398-371-21 SD84 UN-30 30 1 0.14 80 734 398-371-22 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 735 398-371-23 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 736 398-371-24 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 737 398-371-25 SD84 UN-30 30 0.15 80 738 398-371-26 SD84 UN-30 30 0.13 80 739 398-371-27 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 740 398-371-28 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 741 398-371-29 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 742 398-371-30 SDP UN-30 30 0.14 80 743 398-371-31 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 744 398-371-32 SD84 UN-30 30 0.12 80 38 898 400-042-04 Office/Ptarking Lo P DC-3 90 1.53 60 137.7 137 40 77 005-185-27 Office/School SP3 DC-1 90 0.28 80 188.1 188 79 005-185-34 SP3 DC-1 90 0.65 80 32 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Existing Use Zone GP GP Max. DensitySize Designation units acre Parcel acres AB 2011 Base Density Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated Site 80 005-185-37 SP3 DC-1 90 1 1.16 80 41 860 398-562-01 Office SP3 DC-1 90 1.55 80 144.9 144 861 398-562-02 SP3 DC-1 90 0.06 80 43 518 398-221-24 Office P UN-30 30 1.67 80 176.8 176 519 398-221-26 P UN-30 30 0.23 80 520 398-221-27 P UN-30 30 0.21 80 521 398-221-28 P UN-30 30 0.10 80 47 750 398-372-04 Multiple Detached Residential Units SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 49.5 49 751 398-372-05 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 752 398-372-06 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 753 398-372-07 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 754 398-383-01 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 755 398-383-02 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 756 398-383-03 SD84 UN-30 30 0.15 80 48 900 400-043-04 Office/Parking Lots P DC-3 90 0.36 30 151.2 151 901 400-043-06 P DC-3 90 1.32 60 50 81 007-161-02 Multiple Detached Residential Units R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 94.9 94 82 007-161-03 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 83 007-161-04 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 84 007-161-05 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 85 007-161-06 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 33 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Existing Use Zone GP Designation GP Max. DensitySize Parcel acres AB 2011 Base Densi Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Ca aci Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated i units acrel Site 86 007-161-07 R2 CR-30 30 0.05 80 87 007-161-08 R2 CR-30 30 0.08 80 88 007-161-09 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 89 007-161-10 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 90 007-161-11 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 91 007-161-12 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 92 007-161-13 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 51 862 398-562-06 School/Parking Lots SP3 DC-1 90 0.67 80 229.5 229 863 398-562-09 SP3 DC-1 90 0.38 1 80 864 398-562-10 SP3 DC-1 90 1.50 80 56 559 398-252-07 Office SD84 DC-3 90 1.70 80 68 68 57 775 398-385-06 Vacant/Multiple Detached Residential Units SD84 UN-40 40 0.15 80 17.6 17 776 398-385-07 SD84 UN-40 40 0.15 80 777 398-385-08 SD84 UN-40 40 0.14 80 60 98 007-163-02 Multiple Detached Residential Units R2 CR-30 1 30 1 0.14 80 159.9 159 99 007-163-03 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 100 007-163-04 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 101 007-163-05 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 102 007-163-07 R2 CR-30 30 0.15 80 103 007-163-08 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 104 007-163-10 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 =, Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income GP Max. Parcel Lot Map APN Existing Use Zone GP Densi Size Consolidation ID Designation units acres acre Consolidated AB Net Surplus Site Net 2011 Capacity Surplus Base (Consolidated CapacitV Density Site Rounded Down 0.13 105 007-163-11 R2 CR-30 30 80 106 007-163-12 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 107 007-163-13 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 108 007-163-14 R2 CR-30 30 0.15 80 109 007-163-15 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 110 007-163-16 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 111 007-163-17 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 112 007-163-18 R2 CR-30 30 0.15 80 113 007-163-19 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 114 007-163-21 R2 CR-30 30 0.15 80 115 007-163-22 R2 CR-30 30 0.13 80 61 918 400-062-03 Office/Parking Lots P UN-40 40 0.48 30 19.2 10.2 19 64 410-401-05 Plant Nursery C2 UN-30 30 0.34 30 10 66 398-254-01 Office/Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.43 80 26.8 26 P779 398-254-02 SD84 DC-3 90 0.24 80 67 398-386-07 Detached Residential Units SD84 UN-30 30 0.11 80 12 398-386-08 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 8012.5 68 400-051-05 Office/PPtarking P DC-3 90 0.90 30 207.9 207 949 400-051-12 P DC-3 90 0.95 30 908 400-051-13 P DC-3 90 0.46 30 35 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Existing Use -IM!L5L 'r 007-162-01 Zone R2 GP Designation GP Max. DensitySize Parcel AB 2011 Base Densityite Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus capacity Rounded Down Ca aci (Consolidated CR-30 acre S 93 30 0.28 80 94 007-162-03 Religious R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 70 007-162-04 Facility Detached Multiple 54.6 54 95 R2 CR-30 30 0.11 80 96 R2 CR-30 30 0.17 80 007-162-05 Residential Units 97 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 007-162-06 74 1090 410-411-21 OfficeLot /Parking C2 UN-30 30 2.10 30 63.0 62 78 906 400-051-06 Office/Patt rking Lo P DC-3 90 1.65 60 148.5 148 116 007-164-01 Multiple R2 CR-30 30 0.29 80 117 007-164-02 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 80 Detached 37.05 37 Residential Units 118 007-164-03 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 86 578 398-257-11 Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.28 80 11.2 11 87 803 398-441-31 Commercial C2 UN-40 40 0.08 30 1 3.2 3 121 007-183-01 R1 UN-30 30 0.15 80 122 007-183-02 RI UN-30 30 0.15 80 Multiple 123 007-183-03 R1 UN-30 30 0.15 80 90 Detached 54.75 54 Residential Units 124 007-183-04 R1 UN-30 30 0.1S 80 125 007-183-05 R1 UN-30 30 0.15 80 1050 405-176-01 Multiple R3 CR-30 30 0.52 80 1051 1 405-176-02 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 91 1 Detached 241.7 141 Residential Units I 1052 405-176-03 R2 I CR-30 30 0.14 80 36 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Existing Use Zone GP Designation Max. Densi Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Densi Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated units acre Site 1053 405-176-04 R2 CR-30 1 30 0.14 80 1054 405-176-05 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1055 405-176-06 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1056 405-176-07 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1057 405-176-08 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1058 405-176-09 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1059 405-176-10 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1060 405-176-11 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1061 405-176-12 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1062 405-176-13 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 1063 405-176-14 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 94 1094 410-421-04 Office/Parking Lot C2 UN-30 30 1.52 60 205.2 205 1095 410-421-05 C2 UN-30 30 1.90 60 96 579 398-258-01 Office/Commerci al SD84 DC-3 90 0.27 80 28 28 580 398-258-02 SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 586 398-258-10 SD84 DC-3 90 0.09 80 587 398-258-11 SD84 DC-3 90 0.20 80 97 805 398-451-04 Multiple Detached Residential Units SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 12.5 12 806 398-451-06 SD84 UN-30 30 0.11 80 100 126 007-183-10 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 68.25 68 37 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Existing Use ti Zone R2 GP Designation GP Max. Densi Parcel Size acres AB 2011 Base Density Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated UN-30 units acre 30 Site 127 007-183-12 Multiple Detached Residential Units 0.15 80 128 007-183-13 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 129 007-183-14 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 130 007-183-15 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 131 007-183-19 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 132 007-183-20 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 107 807 398-453-02 Vacant/Multiple Detached Residential Units SD84 UN-30 30 0.06 80 66.8 66 808 398-453-03 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 809 398-453-04 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 810 398-453-05 SD84 UN-40 40 0.14 80 811 398-453-06 SD84 UN-40 40 0.54 80 812 398-453-07 SD84 UN-40 40 0.14 80 813 398-453-08 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 814 398-453-09 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 815 398-453-10 SD84 UN-30 30 0.06 80 110 137 007-201.04 Multiple Detached Residential Units R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 41.6 41 138 007-201-06 R2 CR-30 30 0.11 80 139 007-201-07 R2 CR-30 30 0.11 80 141 007-201-17 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 142 007-201-18 R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 117 816 398-454-03 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 24.2 24 38 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map APN Existing Use Zone GP Designation GP Max. DensitySize Parcel acres AB 2011 Base Density Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity Rounded Down Ca aci (Consolidated ID units acre Site 817 398454-14 Vacant/Detached Residential Unit SD84 U1q-40 40 0.43 80 120 162 008-082-16 Multiple Detached Residential Units R2 UN-30 30 0.14 80 27.3 27 163 008-082-17 R2 UN-30 30 0.14 80 164 008-082-18 R2 UN-30 30 0.14 80 124 1105 412-031-03 Multiple -family Residential R4 UN-30 30 5.64 80 366.6 366 130 171 008-091-01 Vacant/Multiple Detached Residential Units SP1 UN-30 30 0.27 80 142.35 142 172 008-091-02 SPl UN-30 30 0.15 80 173 008-091-03 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 174 008-091-04 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 175 008-091-05 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 176 008-091-06 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 177 008-091-14 SPl UN-30 30 0.15 80 178 008-091-15 SPl UN-30 30 0.15 80 179 008-091-16 SPl UN-30 30 0.15 80 180 008-091-17 SPl UN-30 30 0.15 80 181 008-091-18 SPi UN-30 30 0.15 80 182 008-091-19 R2 UN-30 30 0.15 80 136 609 398-267-05 Parking Lot/Commercial SD84 DC-3 1 90 0.08 80 19.6 19 610 398-267-06 SD84 DC-3 90 0.13 80 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN 398-267-09 Existing Use Zone SD84 GP Designation GP Max. Densi Parcel Size acres 0.28 AB 2011 Base Densi Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated units acre DC-3 Site 80 611 90 140 281 011-154-20 Multiple -family Residential R3 UN-40 40 0.28 30 95.2 85 282 011-154-21 R3 UN-40 40 0.26 30 283 011-154-22 R3 UN-40 40 0.37 30 284 011-154-23 R3 UN-40 40 0.32 30 285 011-154-24 R3 UN-40 40 0.72 30 286 011-154-25 R3 UN-40 40 0.65 30 287 011-154-33 R3 UN-40 40 0.24 30 145 504 398-101-13 Multiple -family Residential SD84 DC-5 125 0.17 80 5.95 5 154 1231 412-141-10 Multiple -family Residential C4 DC-2 90 0.83 80 74.7 74 156 615 398-274-01 Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 11.6 11 616 398-274-02 SD84 DC-3 90 0.15 80 166 642 398-301-12 Multiple -family Residential SD84 UN-30 30 0.09 80 41 41 643 398-301-13 SD84 UN-30 30 0.18 80 644 398-301-16 SD84 UN-30 30 0.18 80 646 398-301-20 SD84 UN-30 30 0.37 80 174 19 002-21048 Commercial SP4 DC-2.1 90 4.48 60 1519.2 1519 20 002-221-28 SP4 DC-2.1 90 2.94 60 21 002-221-30 SP4 DC-2.1 90 3.28 60 m Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT TABLE 7 Ab ZU11- MU(e0-Income Anernauve Dies Lot Consolidation Map ID APN E%IStlnx Use Zone GP Designation GP Max. Densi Parcel Size acres 3.01 AB 2011 Base Densi Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Ca aci Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated DC-2.1 units acre 90 Site 60 22 002-221-51 SP4 24 002-222-01 SP4 DC-2.1 90 3.17 60 176 649 398-302-02 Multiple -family Residential SD84 UN-30 30 0.08 80 21.5 21 653 398-302-14 SD84 UN-30 30 0.35 80 190 475 398-015-01 Office SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 123.3 123 476 398-015-02 SP3 DC-1 90 1 0.13 80 477 398-015-03 SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 478 398-015-04 SP3 DC-1 90 0.98 80 196 658 398-311-05 Residential Units Detached SD84 UN-30 30 0.11 80 5.5 5 200 481 398-022-10 Office SP3 DC-1 90 0.91 80 153.9 153 1124 398-022-12 SP3 DC-1 90 0.80 80 206 670 398-321-05 Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.29 80 27.6 27 671 398-321-07 SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 672 398-321-08 SD84 DC-3 90 0.26 80 216 675 398-324-02 Vacant/Multiple Detached Residential Units SD84 DC-3 90 0.29 80 56.8 56 676 398-324-03 SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 677 398-324-08 SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 678 398-324-09 SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 679 398-324-10 SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 680 398-324-12 SD84 DC-3 90 0.57 80 41 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map ID APN Existing Use Zone GP Designation GP Max.Parcel DensitySize acres AB 2011 Base Densi Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity Rounded Down Capacity (Consolidated units acre) Site 220 522 398-231-01 Commercial SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 113.4 113 523 398-231-02 SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 524 398-231-03 SP3 DC-1 90 0.13 80 525 398-231-06 SP3 DC-1 90 0.22 80 526 398-231-07 SP3 DC-1 90 0.22 80 527 398-231-08 SP3 DC-1 90 0.43 80 222 454 396-161-02 Commercial C4 UN-30 30 0.76 30 44.1 44 455 396-161-03 C4 UN-30 30 0.55 30 457 396-161-08 C4 UN-30 30 0.16 30 226 685 398-327-01 Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.22 80 23.2 23 687 398-327-07 SD84 DC-3 90 0.20 80 688 1 398-327-08 SD84 DC-3 90 0.16 80 230 78 005-185-29 Commercial SP3 DC-1 90 1.25 1 80 157.5 157 555 398-244-01 SP3 DC-1 90 0.20 80 556 398-244-02 SP3 DC-1 90 0.30 80 237 1130 398-501-10 Parking Lots/Commercial SD84 DC-3 90 0.11 80 15.6 15 1129 398-501-11 SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 1128 398-501-12 SD84 DC-3 90 0.14 80 240 767 398-384-09 Vacant 1 1 R2 UN-40 40 1 0.26 80 53.3 53 768 398-384-11 R2 UN-40 40 1 0.14 80 42 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Lot Consolidation Map APN Existing Use Zone GP Max. GP Designation Density units acre Parcel Size acres 0.14 AB 2011 Base Density Net Surplus Consolidated Site Net Surplus Capacity, Rounded". Down Capacity (Consolidated ID 769 Site 80 398-384-12 R2 UN-40 40 770 398-384-15 R2 UN-40 40 0.28 80 246 693 398-332-04 Multiple Detached Residential Units SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 71 71 694 398-332-05 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 695 398-332-06 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 696 398-332-10 SD84 UN-30 30 0.57 80 697 398-332-11 SD84 UN-30 30 0.43 80 254 529 398-234-04 Vacant SD84 DC-3 90 0.28 80 11.2 11 255 698 398-333-02 Multiple -family Residential SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 71.5 71 699 398-333-07 SD84 UN-30 30 0.14 80 700 398-333-10 SD84 UN-30 30 0.43 80 701 398-333-11 SD84 UN-30 30 0.43 80 702 398-333-12 SD84 UN-30 30 0.29 80 74 005-184-27 Office SP3 DC-1 90 0.81 8o 72.9 72 1160 005-185-30 Live/Work and Parking Lot SP3 DC-1 90 1.36 80 122.4 122 133 007-183-25 Commercial/Parki ng Lot C2, SP1 UN-30 30 0.64 80 51.2 51 140 007-201-14 Residential C2, R2 CR-30 30 0.14 80 11.2 11 143 007-201-28 Residential R2 CR-30 30 0.12 80 7.8 7 279 011-154-10 Parking Lot R1 UN-40 40 0.49j;; 30 14.7 14 43 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites GP Consolidated Site Net Max. Parcel AB Net Surplus Capacity Lot Map APN Existing Use Zone GP Density Size 2011 Surplus Consolidation ID Designation acres Base (Consolidated Ca aci units acre Densi Site Rounded Down i Multiple -family 291 011-154-43 SD89 UN-40 40 2.16 40 86.4 86 Residential 469 396-361-02 Multiple -family R4 UN-30 30 6.35 60 336.5 336 Residential 473 398-011-01 Office SP3 DC-1 90 1.96 80 176.4 176 480 398-021-01 Mortuary SP3 DC-1 90 0.76 80 68.4 68 665 398-315-01 Open Space SD84 UN-30 30 0.10 80 5.0 5 673 398-322-01 Office SD84 DC-3 90 1.44 80 1 57.6 57 Multiple -family 674 398-323-08 Residential SD84 DC-3 90 1.43 80 57.2 57 684 398-326-11 Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.69 80 27.6 27 852 398-503-11 Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.81 80 72.9 72 872 398-592-09 office SD84 DC-3 90 0.31 80 12.4 12 Live/Work and 883 398-601-04 SD84 DC-3 90 0.51 80 20.4 20 Parking Lot 885 398-603-02 Parking Lot SD84 DC-3 90 0.29 80 11.6 11 912 400-052-01 Office P DC-3 90 1.62 60 145.8 145 930 400-081-05 Office C5 DC-3 90 1.10 60 99 99 933 400-082-04 Office CS DC-3 90 0.90 30 81 81 OfficeLot /Parking 957 402-191-04 C2 DC-3 90 2.92 60 262.8 262 44 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 7 AB 2011— Mixed -Income Alternative Sites Consolidated GP AB Net Surplus Site Net Lot Map GP Max. Parcel 2011 Surplus Capacity Consolidation ID APN Existing Use Zone Designation Density Size Base (Consolidated Capacity units Site - acres Density Rounded acre Down 965 DC-3 90 3.96 60 _ 356.4 356 402-222-04 Office R3 1083 410-401-09 Office C2 UN-30 30 1.38 30 41.4 41 1111 412-191-06 Multiple -family C4 UN-30 30 2.85 60 171.0 170 Residential 1113 430-221-14 Commercial Ml j DC-2 90 2.79 60 251.1 251 45 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Alternative Sites Capacity The alternative sites inventory identifies a surplus capacity 4,222 units for Affordable and 9,648 units for Mixed -Income. Overall, the City has the ability to adequately accommodate the total residential capacity of potential units on exempt sites as required by AB 2011. These sites and the densities allowed meet no net loss requirements for both Affordable and Mixed -Income. The sites are located in areas that are considered highly likely to experience redevelopment for two key reasons: 1) the high dema nd for housing throughout the Southern California region, and 2) the availability of underutilized land in areas designated for high -density mixed -use and residential use. In addition, recent developments and market interest, new flexible and housing -supportive zoning standards (i.e., making the alternative sites eligible for AB 2011 streamlining), and density allowances will serve as a catalyst for more intense development. Table 8 Alternative Sites Inventory Summary Total Surplus Sites Number of Total Area Alternative Parcels Capacity (acres) (units) Affordable 161 71.74 4,222 Mixed -Income 320 139.96 9,648 46 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Assessment of Fair Housing Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Analysis Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Table of Contents Assessment of Fair Housing................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Sources of Information................................................................................................. 3 1.3 General Plan................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Assessment of Fair Housing Issues............................................................................. 8 1.5 Affordable Housing...................................................................................................... 9 1.6 Patterns of Integration and Segregation......................................................................11 1.7 Access to Opportunities..............................................................................................56 1.8 Disproportionate Housing Needs................................................................................92 1.9 Contributing Factors..................................................................................................123 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT3 Assessment of Fair Housing 1.1 Introduction Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule of 2015. The goal of this assessment is to ensure that people have fair housing choice. The AFFH Act has two main purposes —prevent discrimination and reverse housing segregation. To affirmatively further fair housing means "taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws" (Government Code § 8899.50(a)). AB 2011 permits a local government to exempt a parcel from streamlined approval before a developer submits a development application on the parcel if: (1) the local government identifies one or more alternative sites for residential development; (2) the local government has permitted the alternative parcels not otherwise eligible for development pursuant to AB 2011 to be developed pursuant to AB 2011 streamlining; (3) the local government has permitted the alternative parcels that are subject to AB 2011 streamlining to be developed at densities above the residential density required in subdivision (b) of Section 66912.113 (100 percent affordable) or subdivision (b) of 65912.123 (Mixed -Income) of the Government Code; (4) the alternative development would result in no net loss of the total potential residential density in the jurisdiction; (5) the alternative development would result in no net loss of the potential residential density of housing affordable to lower income households in the jurisdiction; and (6) the alternative development would affirmatively further fair housing. This assessment includes the following components: a summary of fair housing issues and an assessment of the City's fair housing enforcement and outreach capacity; an analysis of segregation patterns and disparities in access to opportunities; an assessment of contributing factors, and an identification of fair housing goals and actions and related to housing and community development in a way that affirmatively furthers fair housing; and an analysis demonstrating that the alternative sites identified by the City of Santa Ana in its local implementing ordinance exempting certain sites from AB 2011 streamlining affirmatively furthers fair housing in a manner consistent with the AFFH Act. 1.2 Sources of Information The City used a variety of data sources for the AFFH analysis at the regional and local level. These include: • U.S. Census Bureau's Decennial Census and American Community Survey (ACS) • Orange County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, May 2020 (2020 Al). • Local Knowledge, including information gathered from planning outreach events for major projects such as the Housing Element Update, General Plan Update, and the Zoning Code Update. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Some of these sources provide data on the same topic through different methodologies, which results in various data outcomes. For example, the decennial census is based on a count of the entire population every 10 years while the ACS is based on a small but more detailed survey of the population conducted every year. For this reason, the Census data and ACS data often show some differences. This AFFH analysis includes the most relevant data source for identifying fair housing issues and trends. 1.3 General Plan The Santa Ana General Plan, adopted April 19, 2022, provides long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, quality of life, economic health, and sustainability of the city through 2045. Informed by a comprehensive public engagement process, the General Plan establishes a shared vision of the community's aspirations as the world -class capital of Orange County that celebrates diversity, neighborhoods, and cultural heritage. Focus Areas Santa Ana's Focus Areas, as defined in the General Plan, are strategically located throughout the city along major arterials with access to high quality public transportation and link the City's existing form -based code areas. The Focus Areas provide opportunities to develop a breadth of housing types at densities ranging from 20 to 125 dwelling units per acre by right, and stand to address the diverse housing needs of the community. These areas, characterized by existing, under construction, and planned infrastructure and growth potential, are envisioned as mixed -use hubs combining residential, commercial, and recreational elements. A detailed description of each Focus Area can be found on the interactive General Plan website (https://general-plan-santa-ana- ca.proudcity.com/). The Focus Areas have already begun to experience rapid change and increased opportunity for residents. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area parallels the OC Streetcar route, Orange County's first modern streetcar that will run 4.15 miles and connect to the regional train network by way of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, offering multi -modal mobility options and residential development opportunities along the streetcar stations. The OC Streetcar is slated to be completed and operational in 2025. The Related Bristol Specific Plan was approved October 2024 in the South Bristol Focus Area, effectuating the vision for the Focus Area outlined in the General Plan. At buildout, Bristol Related will accommodate up to 3,750 residential units, a 250- room hotel, a 200-unit tower for senior living, and up to 350,000 square feet of restaurants and shops, as well as a grocery store and 13 acres of park space. Additionally, the City has contracted the services of Torti Gallas + Associates to draft five public realm plans, one for each Focus Area, to ensure infrastructure, pedestrian, bicyclist, and recreational needs are being met in the Focus Areas. This approach will foster walkable environments with easy access to essential services and amenities, providing a high quality of life for all residents, including lower -income individuals residing in existing residences or future residents that will occupy units in future developments within these areas. As such, the Focus Areas are the ideal location for new residential development, opportunity, and housing mobility. The locations of the Focus Areas can be seen in Figure 1 and Figure 2. These plans are currently being developed and are expected to be completed in 2025 as a part of a larger General Plan implementation effort. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Special Development Areas Midtown Plan Santa Ana's Midtown Plan is a strategic initiative aimed at revitalizing and transforming the Midtown area into a vibrant, mixed -use community that supports residential, commercial, and cultural growth. The plan focuses on enhancing connectivity, creating walkable neighborhoods, and encouraging transit -oriented development around key transportation hubs. By integrating affordable housing, public spaces, and improved infrastructure, the Midtown Plan seeks to balance economic growth with inclusivity and sustainability. It prioritizes the preservation of community character while attracting new investments that align with the City's broader vision for equitable urban development. This initiative is part of Santa Ana's efforts to create dynamic and livable neighborhoods that serve diverse residents and businesses. This area encompasses the northern part of Downtown and acts as a bridge between the South Main Focus Area, Transit Zoning Code, and the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. Transit Zoning Code Santa Ana's Transit Zoning Code (TZC) is a comprehensive planning framework designed to promote transit -oriented development and sustainable urban growth. Focused on areas near major transportation corridors and hubs, the TZC encourages mixed -use, high -density developments that integrate housing, retail, and employment opportunities. The code prioritizes walkability, bicycle infrastructure, and access to public transit, reducing reliance on cars and supporting environmentally friendly mobility options. It also incorporates affordable housing incentives, such as density bonuses, to ensure equitable development and mitigate displacement risks. By streamlining the development process and fostering a pedestrian -friendly urban environment, the TZC aligns with Santa Ana's vision for a connected, livable, and sustainable city. The TZC is located east of the Downtown and Civic Center and borders the 5 freeway. Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone Santa Ana's Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone (MEMU) is a targeted zoning strategy designed to transform the Metro East area into a dynamic, mixed -use urban environment. This overlay zone encourages the development of high -density residential, commercial, and office spaces within proximity to major transportation routes and employment centers. By fostering a blend of uses, the MEMU zone promotes walkability, reduces traffic congestion, and enhances access to amenities for residents and workers alike. The zone includes incentives for incorporating affordable housing and green building practices, ensuring that growth is both inclusive and sustainable. Through the MEMU, Santa Ana aims to reimagine the Metro East area as a vibrant, interconnected community that supports economic development while addressing housing needs and environmental goals. The MEMU overlay zone border the TZC and the south end of the Grand and 171^ Street Focus Area. It then runs east across the 5 freeway. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 1 — Santa Ana Focus Areas and Affordable Sites Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 2 - Santa Ana Focus Areas and Mixed Income Sites City of Santa Ana AB 2011, Mixed Income Housing' Act of 2022 - Eligible Properties _ d II —J r , 3 p Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 1.4 Assessment of Fair Housing Issues Federal fair housing laws prohibit discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex/gender, handicap/disability, and familial status. Specific federal legislation and court rulings include: • The Civil Rights Act of 1866 covers only race and was the first legislation of its kind. • The Federal Fair Housing Act 1968 covers refusal to rent, sell, or finance. • The Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 added the protected classes of handicap and familial status. • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) covers public accommodations in both businesses and in multifamily housing developments. • Shelly v. Kramer 1948 made it unconstitutional to use deed restrictions to exclude individuals from housing. • Jones v. Mayer 1968 made restrictive covenants illegal and unenforceable. California state fair housing laws protect the same classes as the federal laws, with the addition of marital status, ancestry, source of income, sexual orientation, and arbitrary discrimination. Specific State legislation and regulations include: • Unruh Civil Rights Act extends to businesses and covers age and arbitrary discrimination. • California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Rumford Act) covers the area of employment and housing, with the exception of single-family houses with no more than one roomer/boarder. • California Civil Code Section 53 takes measures against restrictive covenants. • Department of Real Estate Commissioner's Regulations 2780 to 2782 define disciplinary actions for discrimination, prohibit panic selling, and affirm the broker's duty to supervise. • Business and Professions Code covers people who hold licenses, including real estate agents, brokers, and loan officers. Santa Ana residents have access to information about fair housing enforcement, outreach capacity, and resources available to them. First, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) accepts, investigates, conciliates, mediates, and prosecutes complaints under state and federal law. DFEH investigates complaints of employment and housing discrimination based on protected class. The program provides California's tenants, landlords, and property owners and managers with a means of resolving housing discrimination cases in a fair, confidential, and cost-effective manner. Community Legal Aid SoCal serves low-income people in Orange County with direct representation and engages in policy advocacy and impact litigation. Legal Aid provides legal assistance across a broad range of fair housing issues, including eviction, federally or otherwise publicly subsidized housing, substandard housing, landlord/tenant issues, homeownership issues, homeowners association issues, housing discrimination, and predatory lending practices. The main office is in Santa Ana, with additional offices in Southern California. Community Legal Aid SoCal is funded by the Legal Services Corporation, which carries restrictions against representing undocumented clients. Locally, the Fair Housing Council of Orange County provides a variety of services, including community outreach and education, homebuyer education, mortgage default counseling, Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT landlord -tenant mediation, and limited low-cost advocacy. Their services are provided in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese. The Fair Housing Council also investigates claims of housing discrimination and assists with referrals to DFEH. The Council may also occasionally assist with or be part of litigation challenging housing practices. 1.5 Affordable Housing Santa Ana has been a leader in affordable housing development in the region and currently has 14 family housing projects, 7 senior housing projects, 4 homeless housing projects, and 3 special needs housing projects that serve the community. Currently there are 3 additional housing projects under construction. A full list of the housing projects can be found here: https://www.santa-ana.org/affordable-housing-resources/ The location of subsidized housing in the City can be seen in Figure 3. The City currently has 14 housing projects for families, 7 for seniors, 4 for people experiencing homelessness, and 3 special needs housing projects. With the addition of AB 2011 alternative sites, there is an opportunity for increased development of housing for all affordability levels and to increase the access to affordable housing in the areas of the City that have the higher populations of vulnerable communities. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 3 — Locations of Subsidized Housing 1' • p i • r - age p i r• • •901111• c �� a' • En/J4'yl�i Qwi • ' PQa 9pvw �� IJ yam. _ _ czcwya:, 5I"�'r.�cGm �\ • ., . .• e2i ftd E�mro 00 r rs Subsidized Housing (CHPC, 2023) • 100- 250 Units • Up to 50 Units • 250-500 Units • 50� 100 Units More 500 Units 1:69 925 0 075 1.5 3m1 o� 1 m c—, n im aromea eu.•a. a t.m ewp.em. EW. HERE Gvnrn, G TeaneMa Inc.. USGS. EP4 E N E GamYn. RJ G4m»PeHMao an4Yulun aklle GlS uw ttvmi'unay Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 1.6 Patterns of Integration and Segregation This section includes an analysis of integration and segregation, including patterns and trends, related to people with protected characteristics. Race and Ethnicity Ethnic and racial composition of a region is useful in analyzing housing demand and any related fair housing concerns, as it tends to demonstrate a relationship with other characteristics such as household size, locational preferences, and mobility. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides racial or ethnic dissimilarity trends as an indicator of segregation. Dissimilarity indices can be used to measure how consistent two groups (frequently used to analyze race or ethnicity characteristics) are distributed across a geographic unit, such as a census tract or block group. The dissimilarity index ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 meaning no segregation and 100 meaning high segregation among the two groups. The following ranges show how HUD characterizes levels of dissimilarity: <40: Low Segregation • 40-54: Moderate Segregation >55: High Segregation Regional Trend As shown in Table 1, racial/ethnic minority groups make up 59 percent of the Orange County population. 34 percent of the Orange County population is Hispanic/Latino, 39 percent of the population is White, 21.1 percent is Asian, and 1.6 percent is Black/African American. Santa Ana and the neighboring cities of Anaheim, Tustin, and Garden Grove have larger populations of racial/ethnic minority (non-White) populations compared to the County. Table 1 Racial/Ethnic Composition: Orange County, Santa Ana, and Neighboring Cities Santa Costa Garden Race/Ethnicity Ana Anaheim Tustin Mesa Grove Irvine Orange County Hispanic or Latino (of 76.7% 54.0% 40.0% 35.9% 36.9% 12.0% 34.0% any race) Not Hispanic or Latino 23.3% 46.1% 60.0% 64.1% 63.1% 88.1% 66.0% White alone 9.5% 23.2% 29.6% 40.1% 18.1% 37.4% 39.0% Black or African 0.9% 2.5% 2.3% 1.3% 0.9% 1.7% 1.6% American alone American Indian and 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% o.1% Alaska Native alone Asian alone 11.8% 17.1% 24.1% 9.0% 41.7% 42.6% 21.1% Native Hawaiian, Other 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 0.6% 0.2% 0.3% 25.0% Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone 1.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 13.0% 0.3% 0.3% Two or more races 0.8% 1 2.5% 3.3% 3.7% 5.4% 5.6% 6.0% Source: 2021 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year Estimates. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 As discussed previously, HUD's dissimilarity indices can be used to estimate segregation levels over time. Dissimilarity indices for Orange County and Santa Ana are shown in Table 2. Dissimilarity indices between non-White and White groups indicate that segregation in the county increased with regard to segregation since 1990. Segregation between Hispanic and White communities has increased to moderate levels after having had decreased to Low levels in 2010. Segregation between Black and Asian/Pacific Islander communities with White communities has also increased but at lower levels than Hispanic communities. As a whole, Orange County has seen an increase in diversity since 1990. Non -White populations have been and continue to grow in concentration in central and northern portions of the County, primarily in cities such as Santa Ana, Westminster, Anaheim, Buena Park, and Norwalk. Areas in central Orange County have the highest Dissimilarity Index values for their populations. Orange, Santa Ana and Tustin are particularly affected. The Black/White index value for the city of Orange is 42.35, as opposed to a 22.63 Non-White/White index value. Neighboring Tustin has a 48.19 as their Black/White index value. Table 2 Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarit Trends: Oran a County and Santa Ana 1990 1 2000 2010 Current Orange County Non-White=hite 30.48 1 36.54 1 35.55 40.20 Black/White 32.90 35.33 1 34.07 1 40.77 Hispanic/White 36.26 42.43 39.52 43.26 Sian or Pacific IslanderNVhite 36.26 36.76 37.16 40.77 Santa Ana Non-WhiteNVhite 47.77 49.28 46.49 47.97 Black/White 36.53 27.91 25,15 33.97 HispanicWhite 53,09 53.61 50.00 51.40 Sian or Pacific IslanderNVhite 43.10 46.77 46.87 48.78 Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing AFFH Database, 2020. Figure 4 shows that most central areas in Orange County have high concentrations of racial/ethnic minorities. Coastal cities, including Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa, and the areas east and southeast of Interstate 5 generally have smaller non-White populations. Most block groups inland, including Westminster, Garden Grove, Anaheim, and some parts of Irvine have majority racial/ethnic minority populations. Santa Ana's racial/ethnic minority populations are comparable to the immediately surrounding jurisdictions. Coastal communities west and south of Santa Ana tend to have smaller racial/ethnic minority populations, and communities directly surrounding Santa Ana, such as Garden Grove and Westminster, have larger concentrations of racial/ethnic minorities. The post -World War II period saw urbanization in Orange County, with white, middle class families moving to newly developed suburban communities, particularly along the coast. In contrast, working-class and immigrant populations were often relegated to older, urbanized areas like Santa Ana, where housing was more affordable, and employment opportunities (often in agriculture or industrial sectors) were closer. As a result, these inland areas became home to larger Latino and Asian immigrant communities, particularly after the Immigration and Nationality Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Act of 1965, which expanded immigration opportunities for non -European groups. This can still be seen today with the dissimilarity patterns throughout the region. Ordinance No. NS-3076 ATTACHMENT Figure 4 — Racial Demographics Percent of Non -White Population . ••.• • •• •••r4� •� • r.. • o F •• • • • 00 • • .. • •'•W�'i' • •• fee •se•e •� Racal Demographics (Census, 2020) - Block Group • 40%-60% • 60%. 80% 80%- 100% • 1 ' •* s V•• lS,IHM •• • • • 4b• °s• �• • • •• ® ®® • •• •® •• • e e • a °°°° -• - • - - •-.-r•�asee n 1:169,903 0 175 35 Iml 0 2)5 55 flkm EYI. NEGE W�mn IISGS. EM NR. Efn, MEYG 4a�min, D gwn59rt1d° wnNtrurMo. aM Ne G$ Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Local Trend According to the 2021 ACS, about 77 percent of the Santa Ana population identifies as being Hispanic or Latino of any race. In comparison, only 34 percent of Orange County residents identify the same. The City has a smaller population of White -alone residents compared to neighboring jurisdictions. The Asian -alone population in Santa Ana (11.8 percent) is smaller than in surrounding cities (Anaheim, 17.1 percent; Tustin, 24.1 percent; and Garden Grove, 41.7 percent). However, the census tracts in the western part of Santa Ana, in the Riverview West neighborhood, have large concentrations of Asian residents. The Asian population increased by 11 percent between the 2010 and 2020 census, the majority of which was Vietnamese. The concentration of Vietnamese residents in Santa Ana can be tied to the growing Vietnamese community of Little Saigon that was historically located in Westminster and now encompasses sizable communities in Garden Grove and west Santa Ana. Santa Ana also has smaller population of Black- or African -American -alone residents (>1 percent) compared to many neighboring jurisdictions (Anaheim, 2.5 percent; Tustin, 2.3 percent; and Irvine, 1.7 percent). However, that was not always the case. The Central City neighborhood, roughly bounded by Bristol Street, McFadden Avenue, Raitt Street, and Santa Ana Boulevard, was once home to a thriving African -American population. Many community members served on military bases in Orange County and eventually settled in Santa Ana. However, many African - American families began to move out of Santa Ana during the late 1970s and 80s, with many relocating to the Inland Empire. Some religious institutions and businesses that served this community are still present in the neighborhood today. Dissimilarity indices between non-White and White groups indicate that the city has also stayed almost the same with regard to segregation since 1990. Segregation between Black and White Hispanic communities has decreased, and segregation between Asian/Pacific Islander communities and White communities has increased. Figure 5 and Figure 6 show predominant race in Santa Ana. The majority of the city is predominantly Hispanic or Latino. The Majority Hispanic and Latino population continues in the north into parts of Garden Grove, but this is in contrast to the predominantly Asian population to the West and Southeast. AB2011 Sites Inventory To assess the City's AB2011 sites inventory, the distribution of sites by income category and predominant population are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Most sites for affordable and mixed income are in areas where the predominant population is Hispanic or Latino. This is consistent with the demographics in the City. As shown in the figures, a majority of these sites are located in the central and northern parts of the City where existing general plan land use designations and zoning districts permit multi -family development are located. These areas are also served by high quality transit, such as rapid transit bus lines, the OC Streetcar, and the Santa Ana Regional Transportation center (SARTC), which connect to the broader Metrolink system. The locations of the sites have the potential to improve existing conditions through increased investment and provision of new services that will not only benefit new residents but also improve the quality of life for all segments of the community, especially existing residents. The sites are also located in areas that have been designated for redevelopment through the City's General Plan and Focus Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Areas. Current development trends show that high residential density is feasible and realistic, and appropriate to accommodate housing for all income levels and can be accommodated on the alternative parcel sites. Sites that have been redeveloped include social lodges, religious facilities, office buildings, industrial buildings, older/smaller multi -family residential, and single family units. Exempt Sites The sites exempted by the City are mostly concentrated along the west side of 17h Street, the east side of 17h Street, and Tustin Avenue on the east. These sites are generally not in Focus Areas or in areas that have been designated for redevelopment through the City's General Plan. Like the Alternative sites, the majority of the sites are in areas where the predominant population is Hispanic or Latino, matching the demographics of the City. The City's local AB 2011 implementing ordinance exempted these parcels of land from the streamlining provisions with the identification of one or more alternative sites for each that result in a no net loss of the permitted residential density in the City. Conclusion In the case of predominant race, both the Alternative and Exempt sites are located in areas with the majority of the population identifies as Hispanic or Latino. Ultimately the Alternative sites are predominantly located in the central and northern areas of the City, where zoning and land use plans support multi -family development. With access to high -quality public transit, including rapid bus lines, the OC Streetcar, and connections to the Metrolink system via the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC), these locations are well positioned to attract new investment. This new development has the potential to improve conditions for both new and existing residents by providing additional services and enhancing the overall quality of life for the entire community. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 5 — Predominant Race and Affordable Sites � eta9r��az� fi I ¢tn�lu. R'tifu iNa�� G3q x1=ar nei00.:naae �nlrT_b GO 0 a n'T •1'T.3 TO ,�SjJ _ O Al Iln ;S;' &rGfru � 3�ti; w 12 312024, 3:32:55 PM e Approved Allordable Alternative Sites Asian alone. not Hispanic or Latino Predominant Population (ACS, 2017-2021) -Tract 0 - 13 White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino 13.97 197-100 FA 163,325 0 05 1 mi 0 1 s rm f y o1 Lw MgeM4 Bu�eeu of Ltr'a .t.i::; �: nr, E+n HFRF, Wrnx. eeeTcnMPoe+ Ire. u:cs. �4 Ean E[E Uurrtl�, m9 OW �.reeW.ap .uuM,a GSua uiAY Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 6 — Predominant Race and Mixed Income Sites L C.duµrtnii �C'P l9�lti -.-- _- T 1J] i r L:yt�w° 1F�J' I ana�aa":� I 4II.ti4t% �1'" Gal F Masai 9L>t '}j -12 12(7i2024, 1001:23AM Appmved Flexed Income Allemalive S'tas = Asian alone, not Hispanic or Talmo Predominant population(ACS, 2017-2021)-7ract 0-13 While alone. not Hispanic or La1mo Hlspamc or Latino 13-97 197 -100 a 'u1JYln..�n.. 173 J61 a aiS is 1rx a 125 2.5 51,n G Io .1 Lm Mpelm. Buenu G L.. tirsra 11 E- rate Wrmn, 4xTlmM®q�ea E,, bpi• I E Wmdn penSYeeYdaC Ordinance No. NS-3075 L. qMj u m[Ntiwv ATTACHMENT Figure 7— Predominant Race and Affordable Exempt Sites evaw.m Ith n u,� i'- 12l712024, 1022:27 AM ARoraable Exempt Sites _ Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino Predominant Population(ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract 0-13 Wht1e alone, not Hispanic or Latina Hispanic or Latino 13-97 97 -100 173661 0 D75 15 ml 0 1.25 25 5Nm Larch al L» PgeMs, Bwvau al La,E xWwp,mnl ER XEAE. Gvmn. GwTecMJaJe4 .U:HS. EWE .1 XENE Gamin, O PofnSPeetlAa{ vm ubn.am tlw G�GuaermnmuuM Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 8 — Predominant Race and Mixed Income Exempt Sites . P9+]l.m;Sm n°�i-3 tlf �4m f3 @tmlo �f(iif'nr"IT i� J 1%nxxr+wra � ate;,.-:k coo �TM T, �wrr, c+�ctu etia,� ° A; 12JTM24, 10134:15 AM Mixed Income Fxampl Siles Asian alone, not Historic nr Lalmo Predominant Population(ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract 0-13 White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino 13-97 197 - 100 1:73,661 0 075 1s 3ml 0 ils 5 5,km si Ha w anRe.. a...o. n c.w iKnmeMni. s�va`mrna, Z ." . oLoisi i:a aGo use+mmr.u, Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Disability Persons with disabilities often have special housing needs because of the lack of accessible and affordable housing, and the higher health costs associated with their disability. In addition, many may be on fixed incomes that further limits their housing options. Persons with disabilities also tend to be more susceptible to housing discrimination due to their disability status and required accommodations associated with their disability. Regional Trend According to the 2021 ACS, 8.8 percent of Orange County residents experience a disability, while 8.2 percent of the Santa Ana population experiences a disability. Santa Ana has a smaller percentage of persons with disabilities compared to Garden Grove (10.9 percent) and Anaheim (8.8 percent) but larger than Irvine (5.6 percent) and Tustin (6.8 percent). As shown in Figure 9, less than 20 percent of the population in most tracts in Orange County experiences a disability. Tracts with disabled populations exceeding 20 percent are not concentrated in one specific area of the county. Santa Ana and areas to the east have the smallest concentration of persons with disabilities and this is due to resources and housing in the census tracts with higher populations. The tracts with the highest population are locations of senior communities, most notably Leisure World to the west. The concentration of persons with disabilities in Santa Ana is comparable to neighboring cities. Local Trend Most tracts in Santa Ana have populations of persons with disabilities below 10 percent. A handful of census tracts in the northern, central, and western part of the city have a higher percentage of persons with disabilities. These tracts are home to a higher proportion of senior -headed households and residential -care facilities than the other tracts in the City. Independent living and cognitive difficulties are the most common disability type in Santa Ana; 4.4 percent of the population experiences an independent living difficulty, 3.7 percent experiences a cognitive difficulty, 4.4 percent experiences an ambulatory difficulty, 2.3 percent experiences a hearing difficulty, 1.8 percent experiences a vision difficulty, and 2.4 percent experiences a self -care difficulty according to the 2021 ACS. According to the 2012 ACS Santa Ana had 7.1 percent of the population with a disability. The population with a disability is slowly growing, but does not show a drastic change since 2012. AB2011 Sites Inventory All AB2011 sites are in tracts where less than 20 percent of residents experience one or more disabilities as seen in Figure 10, Figure 11, and Table 3. A majority of these sites are located in the central and northern parts of the City where there is 10 percent or less of the population with a disability and where existing general plan land use designations and zoning districts permit multi -family development are located. These areas are also served by high quality transit, such as rapid transit bus lines, the OC Streetcar, and the Santa Ana Regional Transportation center (SARTC), which connect to the broader Metrolink system. The locations of the sites have the potential to improve existing conditions through increased investment and provision of new services that will not only benefit new residents but also improve the quality of life for all segments of the community, especially existing residents. The sites are also located in areas that have been designated for redevelopment through the City's General Plan and Focus Areas. The Focus Areas Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT will incorporate new recommendations to sidewalks, public gathering places, and local amenities, in order to reach and accommodate all residents. Current development trends show that high residential density is feasible and realistic, and appropriate to accommodate housing for all income levels and can be accommodated on the alternative parcel sites. Sites that have been redeveloped include social lodges, religious facilities, office buildings, and industrial buildings, older/smaller multi -family residential and single-family units. Table 3 Distribution of Units by Disabilit Affordable Mixed Income Total <10% 94% 92% 93% 10%-20% 6% 8% 7% 20%-30% 0% 0% 0% 30%-40% 0% 0% 0% > 40% 0% 1 0% 0% Total 4,222 1 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, most of the exempt sites are in neighborhoods where less than 10 percent of the population has a disability. The City's AB 2011 implementing ordinance exempts these parcels from streamlining provisions, while identifying one or more Alternative sites to ensure no net loss of permitted residential density. Conclusion For populations with disabilities, both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where less than 10 percent of the population is affected. However, the Alternative sites are primarily situated in the central and northern parts of the City, where zoning and land use plans encourage multi- family development. These areas also benefit from excellent public transit options, including rapid bus lines, the OC Streetcar, and connections to the broader Metrolink system through the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC). As a result, these locations are well -positioned to attract new investment. The development of these sites has the potential to improve conditions for both new and existing residents, offering additional services and enhancing the quality of life for the entire community. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 9 — Population with a Disability Y�Or I 1/812023, 11 07 213 AM City_Boundary 10%-20% Population With a Bisability'(ACS, 2017.2021)-Tract - 20%- 30% =`10% 30% 40% 1'120,029 0 1 2 4ml 0 175 35 7Mm wunN nt Lou Mgeky Bureau.1lvE M1iwp[nvm. B4. HERE. UMft IJE EM NPS.Eatl, HEPC.Ga AC 'SrOVWP vn+VIOMn vW Pe CJE uett cwmmun6y Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 10 — Population with a Disability and Affordable Sites ILFF .. f*i wmn QOW NI 114" µ \ R 6m �rrrarnmi-a � i md� I r. 12/32024. 336,47 PM Approved Affordable Allernelrve Silas Population With a Disability (ACS, 2017-2021) -Tract 0,10% ® 10%-20% = 20%-30% 1 63,325 of t zmi �1 3 4km am,1w.aelool Hisee am. se. G[eTc.mlryin, rc. -SGS. En "I nSax�AVG vnVWbs..u'a1ne G15 w, m-11 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 11— Population with a Disability and Mixed Income Sites C,0-7,— GT. f f 12/712024, 10 02:14 AM 0 Approved Mixed Income Alternative Sits Popelalb0 With a DIMIA Y(ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract =•10% ® 10%-20% 20%- 30% i-73,661 015 15 125 25 Ganry n 1- nre.b., G,ee. a 1.b 61 HEM m, GeoTe[nwY�es u5G5, EFe Ewu HEFE. Ger:An, 6 OpenSbeMla� Ordinance No. NS-3075 .- mffiur... fl a� la�waim ATTACHMENT Figure 12 — Population with a Disability and Affordable Exempt Sites -urv�lemcca r...Cb[r@u Duly uto i —_� I 4.. i 77, �amu _ ^'�7an:mixb I — r 71- �. 12/7I2024, 10.25:01 AM Affomabto Exempt Sites Population With a Disability (ACS, 2017-2021) -Tract 0<10% 10%-20% 20% 30% If 1.73,661 fJ5 15 o 125 25 km Es EM E.XE.E, WrnT. WeTxnMq�ea In i, rtPE wrMn, a Cgn•1.xtE11aP a��lwubu. ai2F�e WSuae,cmrru+dt' Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 13 — Population with a Disability and Mixed Income Exempt Sites n u N, I J C.'SLi2n .: C� 5aem �r>vow 67TTJPla u-uD 120/2026,10:39:28'AM Mixon Income Exempt Sites Population With a DlSaURY (ACS, 2017-2021)-Tea 0,10% 10%-20% 20%-30% -� N-FmIhC _a. F) — 1 73.661 e e]5 15 ml � 125 25 5km ei, ems, nexe coma wore.mmea.� usm. ma. e.v eFnS. ca,m.. o aoe��xeraao Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Familial Status Familial status refers to the presence of children under the age of 18, pregnant women, and any person in the process of securing legal custody of a minor child (including adoptive or foster parents). Housing discrimination can affect families with children, or families that recently had a child. This primarily happens through landlords refusing to rent to a family with children or evicting a family that just had a child. Under the Fair Housing Act, housing providers may not discriminate based on familial status. Regional Trend Approximately 55 percent of Santa Ana households are families with a married couple. Out of those couples, 48 percent have children (2021 ACS). The City's share of households with a married couple is larger than the county's share and the shares of the neighboring cities of Anaheim, Costa Mesa, Garden Grove, Irvine, and Tustin (Figure 14). Of the selected jurisdictions, Costa Mesa has the largest proportion of single -adult households, which represent 46.4 percent of all households in the City. In 2010, Orange County household makeup was relatively similar to today, with 54.2 percent of households being married couple households. However, the number of female headed households has increased with only 11.4 percent of households being headed by a female in 2010 to now being 24.3 percent. Figure 14 — Households in Orange County, Santa Ana and Neighboring Cities 100.0% _. 90.0% 14.9% 15.89/ 21.4% 16.3% 187% 14.5% 15.5% 80.0% 70.0% 23.4% 26.540 24.5% 23.9% 26.8% 24.3% 25.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Santa Ana Anaheim Costa Mesa Garden Grove Irvine Tustin Orange County ■ Married -couple household ■ Cohabiting couple household g Female householder, no spouse or partner present ® Male householder, no spouse or partner present Local Trend Santa Ana has seen a decrease in households with children since 2010. During the 2006-2010 ACS, 47 percent of households had children. The 2017-2021 ACS estimates that only 36.4 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 percent of households have children in Santa Ana, representing an approximate 10 percent decrease. According to the 2017-2021 ACS, approximately 27 percent of Santa Ana households are single parents with children, and 71 percent of those are female headed. Female -headed households with children require special consideration and assistance because of their greater need for affordable housing and accessible day care, health care, and other supportive services. As shown in Figure 15 and Figure 16, there are tracts throughout the City that have a slightly higher number female headed households with children and a small cluster in the south that has over 40 percent of the households being female headed households with children and no spouse present. AB 2011 Sites Inventory In Santa Ana, a majority of the City's AB 2011 sites are in tracts where 60 to 80 percent of households are married couple households with children (Table 4). The location of the sites and the units are consistent with the makeup of the city as a majority of the tracts in the City have 60 to 80 percent of the households being married couple households with children (Figure 19 and Figure 20). The locations of the sites do not exacerbate existing conditions. Moreover, the locations of the sites have the potential to improve existing conditions through providing additional housing opportunities for families with children in areas where they already have established social networks and capital ensuring that families stay in the City. Table 4 Distribution of Units by Children in Married Couple Households Affordable Mixed Income Total <20% 0% 0% 0% 200/6--40% 0% 3% 2% 40%-60% 22% 27% 25% 60%-80% 51% 42% 45% > 80% 27% 28% 28% Total 4,222 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, most of the exempt sites are in tracts where 60 to 80 percent of households are married couple households with children. The City's AB 2011 implementing ordinance exempts these parcels from streamlining provisions, while identifying one or more Alternative sites to ensure no net loss of permitted residential density. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are located in areas where 60 to 80 percent of the population consists of married couple households with children. However, the Alternative sites are predominantly in the central and northern parts of the City, where zoning and land use plans promote multi -family development. The promotion of multi -family development in these areas allows for higher -density housing, making them ideal locations for apartments, townhomes, and condominiums. This provides more affordable housing options and increases the availability of Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT housing units especially allowing for the potential for larger units to accommodate families. The Alternative sites being in and around downtown and the Focus Areas ready them for revitalization which includes have improved safety and walkability, with a growing focus on pedestrian -friendly streets and traffic calming measures making these sites a great place to keep our family populations. Ordinance No. NS-3075 Figure 15— Children in Female Headed Household and Affordable Sites 1Z32024, 340:53 PM 163,325 * Approved Affordable Allemalwo Silos PfW20%-40% Children in Female Householder No Spouse Present (ACS, 2017-2021) -Tract - 40%- 60 % = Less Than ye% 60%- 80% as Eul ease. Cuimn, G_e:RnmJapCa in.. U:iiS. EG4 Eur. £PE. e, i Own^rtnWW Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 16 — Children in Female Headed Household and Mixed Income Sites LAW4E, t+x`V . Its 3 �\ qF, Ifw �$ —1 I TT.. r mWdcE.e y4, L+121RY1a _ �M CiID•�J 124/2024, 10.03.22 AM Approved Mixed Income Nlernalive Sites FEM 20%. 40% children In Female Householder I In Spouse Present (ACS. 2017-2021) -Tract _ 40%- 60% 0 Less then 20% 60%- 60% 1 Y3,661 n95 16 3m1 0 125 25 5hm a ,,, a L. n..aw. w..<.� n �.w w:.1-1 En, XERE. Germ*. se.71'1. Jer.:rc..:15Gs di EW, NEPE G-1, 6 Own9welAlep u:bw4xa, anC IMGIS uw��urnvree Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 17— Children in Female Headed Households and Affordable Exempt Sites 121712024, 10:2544AM 173,661 • Affordable Fannpt Sites W 20%-40% Children in Ferrets Householder He Spouse Present (ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract - 40%- 00% 0 Less than 20s, 60%- no% n re 125 25 5Fm Ew, XECE Isig WTw�meyeo d u5fi5. EPP E, XEPE. G d nsnxu.W[ mrrnwbnanc um t'i5im mrm urM w Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 18 — Children in Female Headed Households and Mixed Income Exempt Sites a u dl —. A - \ _L—$C4s0��v®9 L �I m I ' ruw—:vas p Ct�Yltb _ 1 ®CYi � (om1 r 12172024, 10:39 56 AM Mixed Income Exempt Sites -, 20%- 40R. Children in Female Householder llo Spouse Present (ACS, 2017-2021)-Tract ®40%- 60% = Less than 20% = 60%- 80% 1:73,661 0 aIs 1$ 3m. 0 125 25 kn om cl Laa MMue. &nvvu cl LVN AYnapmes En MPRE fumi?, GaicrvNoyes In<. IMGS, EPq Eut �hAE GvnYn, S Pau2eelAlap mn4euNs.mNU�e GIS uee. m+mwnY Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 19 — Children in Married Couple Households and Affordable Sites 12732024, 3'4220 PM 1:63,325 Apnrnvxd ARgrdaMe WtxrnalNG Sites _40%-FA% 0 05 1 2mi Percent of Children in Marred Couple Households (ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract 60%-80% o i z 4 k. 0% � 20% 80%- 100% 20% � 46 % Ev{ HERE. Gvm+. CeaTttEuly.ea 'Ic USGS, EFc, Evn XENE, L GenS:neiMac milnCnlm, ano Ih GI6 uarnwm�'u� � q Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 20 — Children in Married Couple Households and Mixed Income Sites Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 21 - Children in Married Couple Households and Affordable Exempt Sites 1217/2024,10:26:40AM 1:73.681 • Affordable Exempt Sites = 40%-60% Percent of Children In Married Couple Households (ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract - 60%-e0% O 0%. 20% 60%-100% ® 26%-40 % 025 1.6 3m1 126 25 5km E9p, Evl, IEpE. fia�nln. ® GgnR Map tanYM uM, aw Yw GIS uw mmnwnry Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 22 — Children in Married Couple Households and Mixed Income Exempt Sites 12/7l2024, 10.40:19AM 1,73,661 Mixed Income Exempt Sites = 40%- 60 % Percent of Children in Married Couple Households (ACS, 2017-2021)-Tract - 00%- 80% C�0 %-20% 80%-100% �20% -40% ors 15 nml Iis :5 5km Wnry; Lw w+nalw, a al Lam xUngwteel, XEPE .1 , fy m. GpTtt++doxs. irc.. 15G5. EFE. Ga�m'n. L OFsn'v1eeJ.UP c'Mkumn arc me w5vrc ommvnM 1610,01=2 BAOM"I ATTACHMENT Income Identifying low- or moderate -income (LMI) geographies and individuals is important to overcome patterns of segregation. HUD defines an LMI area as a census tract or block group where over 51 percent of the population is LMI (based on HUD's income definition of up to 80 percent of the AMI). Regional Trend As shown in Table 5, 44.8 percent of Orange County households are low/moderate income, earning 80 percent or less of the area median income (AMI). There are significantly more LMI Renter occupied households (61.8 percent of total households) compared to owner occupied households (32.1 percent of total households). Figure 23 shows LMI areas regionally. Coastal cities from Seal Beach to Costa Mesa as well as the southern end of Irvine have low concentrations of LMI households. In these areas, less than 25 percent or 25 to 50 percent of the population is LMI in most tracts. LMI households are most concentrated in the central Orange County region around Santa Ana. There are smaller concentrations of LMI households in and around the cities of Garden Grove and Anaheim. Santa Ana has LMI household concentrations that are most similar with the cities immediately surrounding the city boundaries. According to the ACS, in 2021 the median income for a household in Orange County was $100,485 up from $74,344 in 2010. Table 5 Household Income Cate or by Tenure — Orange Count Income Category Owner Renter Total 0%-30%of AMI 8.3% 23.7% 14.9% 31 %-50% of AMI 8.9% 17.4% 12.5% 51 %-80% of AMI 14.9% 20.7% 17.4% 81 %-100% of AMI 9.9% 10.5% 10.2% Greater than 100% of AMI 57.9% 27.7% 45.0% Total 568,550 436,425 1,024,975 Source: HUD CHAS based on 2013-2017 ACS. Local Trend More than half of Santa Ana households are in the low or moderate income categories. According to HUD's definition, there are many LMI areas in Santa Ana, especially concentrated in downtown and the west side of the city. The west side of Santa Ana historically had a large number of industrial and manufacturing sites, which typically attracted lower -income workers. According to the 2021 ACS, the median household income in Santa Ana is $77,283 significantly lower than $100,485 countywide. Santa Ana also has a lower median income than the nearby cities of Tustin ($93,901), Irvine ($114,027) and Anaheim ($81,806). Figure 24 and Figure 25 show median income in Santa Ana by tract. Downtown Santa Ana and the west side of the City has the lowest median incomes, with downtown being less than $55,000. In 2010, the median income was $54,877 and did not increase at the same rate as the median income in the County overall. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT AB2011 Sites Inventory Figure 24 and Figure 25 show the sites in relation to median income. Most of the sites are in areas where household income is between $55,000 to $90,100 (Table 6). The locations of the sites do not exacerbate existing conditions as they do not displace any local employers that provide living wages. The locations of the sites have the potential to improve existing conditions through increased investment and provision of new services that will not only benefit new residents but also improve the quality of life for all segments of the community, especially existing residents. The sites are also located in areas that have been designated for redevelopment through the City's General Plan and Focus Areas. The Focus Areas will fosters walkable environments with easy access to essential services and amenities, providing a high quality of life for all residents, including lower -income individuals residing in existing residences or future residents that will occupy units in future developments within these areas. Current development trends show that high residential density is feasible and realistic, and appropriate to accommodate housing for all income levels and can be accommodated on the alternative parcel sites. Sites that have been redeveloped include social lodges, religious facilities, office buildings, and industrial buildings, older/smaller multi -family residential and single-family units. Table 6 Distribution of Units b Median Income Affordable Mixed Income Total < $55,000 27% 30% 29% $56,000 - $90,100 68% 61% 63% $90,100 - $120,000 5% 9% 8% $120,000 - $175,000 0% 0% 0% > $176,000 0% 0% 0% Total 4,222 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, most of the exempt sites are in tracts where household income is between $55,000 to $90,100. The City's AB 2011 implementing ordinance exempts these parcels from streamlining provisions, while identifying one or more Alternative sites to ensure no net loss of permitted residential density. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are located in tracts where household income is between $55,000 to $90,100. However, the Alternative sites are predominantly in the central and northern parts of the City, where zoning and land use plans promote multi -family development. The promotion of multi -family development in these areas allows for higher -density housing, making them ideal locations for apartments, townhomes, and condominiums. This provides more affordable housing options and increases the availability of housing units especially a variety of housing types for a large range of incomes. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 23 — Low to Moderate Income Population Low to Moderate Income Population (HUD, 2011-2015) - Block Group 0 < 25% 25% - 50% 50%-75% 75%-1OWN 1 [ a9 9UI 1i5 15 2 75 5.5 11 km w .1 too m '.., a...... :" rem, W HERE Ga i'. USM Er . =v.�HER.E. .w� wnYr„aiv Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 24 — Median Income and Affordable Sites u V is .• �� rac: w� Y� i N 1. - u.nOCp kl f('l YID f `U�tIC% ' 1202024. 3:44:02 PM • Appmvatl Aaord.blaAllernalrve$it.s M$90,100-$120,000 Median Income(AC5, 2017-2021)-Tract $120000-$175,000 0 Less than $55000 _ Greeter than $175 000 $55,000 - $90,100 163325 0 OS 1 7- p 1 2 m Fm NwE �m.¢'�txnu wr zwa^��. FM. Fen. rHUE Ga.min, E�gtnFTeMY m^YwM.WIn 415uw�«nnwnm� Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 25— Median Income and Mixed Income Sites 12nR024, 10 04:20 AM 1:73 e61 Approved Mixed Income ARometive Sites $90,100 - $120 000 Median Income LAGS, 2017-2021)-Tract $120,000-$175,000 0 Less than $55,000 Greater than $175.000 I� $55,000 - 590,100 075 15 25 :5 5W Eul, HEgE Gammn. Ge.Rm'rlopin ine.vU:G¢', EPA Brt fraiE Wrrrin. C penStrteWlu mnlr6uM..utive GIS un wmrrunrly Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 26 — Median Income and Affordable Exempt Sites U uY :PinlW:d w u { !t3._�'ul Ally alY<•IY i?'.' —� 12t712024, 1027:05 AM • Aifortlabla Exampl Silas M$90,100-$120,000 Median Income (ACS. 2017-2021) -Tract - $120A00 - $175,000 Less than$55.000 Greater than$175,000 555,000 - 590,100 `J. u tiR)* I h f.11 1 :ffhl F't 3L:if. `C. 1j pnc`tJmnlG4a f Y �`� .e9�4%�i YT�V !>I�EJ 2i..Qf JJ 173,661 o ars is 0 1 kn o, w.v.a.. e�..<m lnm wn as Hane, win,,. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 27— Median Income and Mixed Income Exempt Sites 1217/2024, 10:40:46 Ant 1.73,661 0 Mixed incemG Exempt Sites _ $90,100 - $120.000 Median Income (ACS, 2017-2021) -Tract - $120 000 - $175,000 Less than $55,000 Greater than $175,000 $55,000 - $90,100 0 a75 15 3H 0 1z& ±s n„ �M, a IF. AnCel., a r..� a 1.-- .M En, XERE, Garmm 4 T.urMvps: EPA, .1 HERE. GUMn, 0 G..'1'I. teW1aP ¢ntr.NA•e.anv Ure USvwr wvnvnMy Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT3 Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty Racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAP) are geographies where a high percentage of the population are people of color who have lower incomes. HUD has identified census tracts with a non -white population of greater than 50 percent and with 40 percent or more of individuals living at or below the poverty line or are three or more times the average poverty rate for the metropolitan/micropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower. Regional Trend Black/African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, persons of a race not listed ("Some other race"), Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islanders, Asian Alone and Hispanic/Latino populations all experience poverty at a higher rate than the average countywide (Table 7). The proportion of non - Hispanic White residents under the poverty level is the lowest compared to other racial/ethnic groups in the county. Overall, in Orange County, 9.9 percent of all people are below the poverty level. Table 7 Poverty Status by Race/Ethnicity Percent Below Poverty Level Santa Ana Orange County White alone 11.6% 8.4% Black or African American alone 10.4% 12.8% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 10.0% 11.2% Asian alone 12.9% 11.2% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 8.3% 10.0% Some other race alone 13.2% 14.9% Two or more races 9.0% 8.3% Hispanic or Latino origin (of any race) 12.5% 12.6% White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 9.6% 6.9% Overall 12.3% 9.9% Source: 2021 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year Estimates. Figure 28 shows R/ECAPs, TCAC-designated areas of high segregation and poverty, and poverty status in the Orange County region. R/ECAPs and areas of high segregation and poverty are seen in Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Anaheim and Costa Mesa. Tracts with larger populations of persons experiencing poverty are also concentrated in these areas (Errorl Reference source not found. and Errorl Reference source not found.). There are no R/ECAPs near the boundaries of the City. Local Trend 12.3 percent of the Santa Ana population is below the poverty level, higher than the rate countywide. Residents belonging to Asian alone experienced poverty at the highest rate. Over 13 percent of the population belonging to a race not listed ("some other race"), 12.9 percent of the Asian population and 12.5 % of the Hispanic or Latino of any race is below the poverty level. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 There are R/ECAPs and TCAC-designated areas of high segregation and poverty in the city, and they are mainly concentrated in and around the downtown area (Figure 28, Figure 29, and Figure 30). AB2011 Sites Inventory The R/ECAP concentration in Downtown Santa Ana is also the location of 53 percent of the units that are being provided by the sites. These areas however are prime for redevelopment and have current projects under construction that will provide market rate and affordable housing that were first identified in the City's Certified Housing Element. As shown in the figures, a majority of the AB2011 alternative sites are located in the central and northern parts of the City where existing general plan land use designations and zoning districts permit multi -family development are located. These areas are also served by high quality transit, such as rapid transit bus lines, the OC Streetcar, and the Santa Ana Regional Transportation center (SARTC), which connect to the broader Metrolink system. The locations of the sites have the potential to improve existing conditions through increased investment and provision of new services that will not only benefit new residents but also improve the quality of life for all segments of the community, especially existing residents. The sites are also located in areas that have been designated for redevelopment through the City's General Plan and Focus Areas. With a greater concentration downtown, the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area would bring great investment to this area greatly impacted by R/ECAP concentration. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area parallels the OC Streetcar route, Orange County's first modern streetcar that will run 4.15 miles and connect to the regional train network by way of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, offering multi -modal mobility options and residential development opportunities along the streetcar stations. The OC Streetcar is slated to be completed and operational in 2025. With development increasing citywide, the City has implemented measures to ensure that displacement of residents in vulnerable areas is reduced. The City has a Rent Stabilization and Just Cause Eviction Ordinance limiting annual rent increases for most rental units to 3% or 80% of the consumer price index (CPI), whichever is lower and includes protections for tenants, requiring landlords to provide a valid reason ("just cause") for evictions. Santa Ana has also focused on preserving its existing affordable housing stock by working with nonprofits and developers to acquire and rehabilitate properties, which includes numerous properties in the Downtown area. Current development trends show that high residential density is feasible and realistic, and appropriate to accommodate housing for all income levels and can be accommodated on the alternative parcel sites. Table 7 Distribution of Units by R/ECAPs Affordable Mixed Income Total High POC Segregation 56% 51% 53% Low -Medium Segregation 25% 34% 31% Racially Integrated 19% 15% 16% Total 4,222 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, there is a higher number of exempt sites located within a high POC segregation area, however these areas are not as easily influenced by the West Santa Ana Focus Area and revitalization that the OC Street Car will bring in the near future. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where there is a R/ECAP. However, with the Alternative sites primarily situated in the central and northern parts of the City, zoning and land use plans encourage multi -family development that could lead to improved conditions for all residents. As a result, these locations are well positioned to attract new investment, especially following the City's goals and policies set forth in the General Plan. The development of these sites has the potential to improve conditions for both new and existing residents, offering additional services and enhancing the quality of life for the entire community. This could lead to increased resources, more local jobs, and a variety of housing types, that could help eliminate the high POC segregation areas. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 28 - County R/ECAPs M COG Geogapny TCACIHGD Opportunity clap . Wo Segregation and Povedy (HCD, 2023) - Tmd 1:169,903 0 175 as mi 0 2.I5 SS ti km aam,na was, e�redua Ww w�avoa E52 nee came H net. r m.n. s or m:�a�a a�m.�wan. arc m ais Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 29 — R/ECAPs and Affordable Sites �Hy o• 1 wiO. _ 1 �sam a Ttm -aai7x � mw1I;/ Pmm5]Q:]I0abim ` W 12/3/2024, 3:48 00 PM 0 Approved Affordable Alternative Silas ® COG Geography TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map - High Segregation and Poverty (HCD, 2023)-Treat 163,325 0 os 1 amp 0 1 2 4xm E>n HFAE. G,-rmI , Geoiee,-,dges. ,.c. USGS, 6e Esn, ARE bvmin p QenA2elAYo ennuwtrai. anvine GlS uan^.amivnq� Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 30 — R/ECAPs and Mixed Income Sites r I f3014D ♦Gill �tl c-AA ad�� -rF, 12f/rz024, 10.04:54 AM Approved Mixed! Income Alternative Silos ® COG Geography TCACIHCD Opportunity Map - High Segregation and Poverty (HCD, 2023)- Tract w 9• tiUYILT�,m� 173,029 075 5 ml ��— t 2 dFm eve, xEnE. a.+IM1.M1. a.orzuM1aes*o. lM1�, o,c.. EPA Eml. 1£A E. wmin, D OMnSeNIMaC NnVWUWs NbIM1e GlSum tv,nnunCy Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 31— PIECAPs and Affordable Exempt Sites I ecr>mmsn I] ..aesmv. -.:n em�aormc mio to -I - atrnma on,giaw�. o We44aam� II rM nw"IP +�+ F: n a :ce man" J ��lip uts�me gm-nlcc' - P£etatatio1109 c2Ua-ad.� -mom It# f_ ascnno ID _ sicra�� Y `,n �...m _ _ _ �' �`® ...... 1217/2024, 1027.37 AM Affordable Exempt Sitee ® COG Geography TCACHCD opportunity Map -High Segregation and Poverty (HCD, 2023)-Tract 173 C61 n15 li 3ml 126 25 5km mrrvV or w Annlamxnnu s �o m nlena9emen. E>A XE., Wrmmi < 11 EXFAE, vrmN. Umn9:rtMlap sgroubv. aro Pe GIS over rorrr un,ry Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 32 — RECAPS and Mixed Income Exempt Sites - vayommtsrl ...�� - = - oslaicmepff. � _ cros fl a . �3 ha mew 1 ' �. mLums by -u I flm'elOm '�J�'� Rc�a^amvsq a� aD � � v('D 12172024, 1041:14AM Mixed Income Fxempt S[as ® COG Geography TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map - High Segreganton and Poverly, (HCD, 2023) -Tract 173,029 076 15 JmI 1 ] Akm hurl m L. M l t Pureerr W 1anl \Ixrrp—t EL, HERE, GY , o—TMldrs Inc W65. EM E , !.a Garmin, a OFtlnS�NNlap tmlrvuru n, arru Pe GlS use amrnunlly Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Affluence While R/ECAPs have long been the focus of fair housing policies, racially concentrated areas of affluence (RCAA) must also be analyzed to ensure housing is integrated, a key to fair housing choice. A HUD Policy Paper defines racially concentrated areas of affluence as affluent, White communities. According to this report, Whites are the most racially segregated group in the United States and "in the same way neighborhood disadvantage is associated with concentrated poverty and high concentrations of people of color, conversely, distinct advantages are associated with residence in affluent, White communities." Based on this research, HCD defines RCAAs as census tracts where 1) 80 percent or more of the population is white, and 2) the median household income is $125,000 or greater (slightly more than double the national median household income in 2016). Regional Trend Figure 33 shows that the City of Santa Ana has no racially concentrated areas of affluence itself, but there are areas surrounding the City within the County. There is a higher concentration of RCAAs in South County, particularly in Newport Beach and along the coast. There is also a high concentration to the east in Tustin and north towards Yorba Linda. These areas all have higher median income and a higher percentage of white only populations. Local Trend While Santa Ana is generally a diverse and lower income city, with a large Latino population, there are some areas of relative affluence. However, Santa Ana does not typically align with traditional definitions of RCAAs, which are more common in wealthy suburban or metropolitan areas where affluent, racially homogeneous communities form. West Floral Park and Park Santiago are adjacent to Floral Park, one of the more affluent areas of Santa Ana. These two neighborhoods have higher incomes and are less racially diverse than other parts of Santa Ana, but these areas offer more development opportunity. These areas tend to have more single-family homes, larger lots, and greater access to amenities like parks, schools, and services. With the proximity of these neighborhoods to the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area, these more affluent areas could influence growth in Downtown. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 33— Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence Racially Concentrated Areaso`Afflu nce(HCD, 2019)-Tmo No: a RCAA RCAA ems 7 a69,903 i 7F ➢= /�*I zr4 $ E +t km t',a.N" :I IdG .4ryYee:, PiLrtW� dlaM. b4: mM1vcl. 'EY4 ISEAE GJtRAM1 Ii5t35. EF.1 TF5' �. HE"�- L+Tphv Q�0.�.,rtffib1aC :IXM.:e:L4x, iru �!`: a� Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 1.7 Access to Opportunities To assess fair access to opportunities regionally and locally, this analysis uses HUD Opportunity Indicators and TCAC Opportunity Area Maps. This section also specifically addresses economic, education, environmental, and transportation opportunities. HUD developed an index for assessing fair housing by informing communities about disparities in access to opportunity based on race/ethnicity and poverty status. Index scores are based on the following opportunity indicator indices (values range from 0 to 100): • Low Poverty Index: The higher the score, the less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood. • School Proficiency Index: The higher the score, the higher the school system quality is in a neighborhood. • Labor Market Engagement Index: The higher the score, the higher the labor force participation and human capital in a neighborhood. • Transit Trips Index: The higher the trips transit index, the more likely residents in that neighborhood utilize public transit. • Low Transportation Cost Index: The higher the index, the lower the cost of transportation in that neighborhood. • Jobs Proximity Index: The higher the index value, the better access to employment opportunities for residents in a neighborhood. • Environmental Health Index: The higher the value, the better environmental quality of a neighborhood. To assist in this analysis, HCD and the California TCAC convened the California Fair Housing Task Force to "provide research, evidence -based policy recommendations, and other strategic recommendations to HCD and other related state agencies/departments to further the fair housing goals (as defined by HCD)." The task force created `opportunity maps" to identify resource levels across the state "to accompany new policies aimed at increasing access to high opportunity areas for families with children in housing financed with 9 percent Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs)." These opportunity maps are made from composite scores of three different domains made up of a set of indicators related to economic, environmental, and educational opportunities and poverty and racial segregation. Based on these domain scores, tracts are categorized as Highest Resource, High Resource, Moderate Resource, Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing), Low Resource, or areas of High Segregation and Poverty. Table 8 shows the full list of indicators. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT3 Table 8 Domains and List of Indicators for Opportunity Maps Domain Indicator Poverty Adult education Economic Employment Job proximity Median home value Environmental CalEnviroScreen 4.0 pollution Indicators and values Math proficiency Reading proficiency Education High School graduation rates Student poverty rates Poverty: tracts with at least 30% of population under federal poverty line Poverty and Racial Segregation Racial Segregation: Tracts with location quotient higher than 1.25 for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, or all eo le of color in comparison to the Count ource: California Fair Housing Task Force, Methodology for TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps. Regional Trend HUD Opportunity Indicator scores for Orange County are shown in Table 9. For the county, the White population, including the population below the federal poverty line, received the highest scores in low poverty, labor market participation, jobs proximity, and environmental health. Hispanic communities scored the lowest in low poverty, school proficiency, and labor market participation. Asian or Pacific Islander (non -Hispanic) communities scored the lowest in environmental health and jobs proximity, and was most likely to use public transit. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Table 9 HUD Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicit : Santa Ana/Orange Count Low Poverty School Prof. Labor I Market I Transit Low Transp. I Cost Jobs Prod Env. Health Santa Ana - Total Population White, non -Hispanic 43.58 40.95 48.31 92.62 80.95 74.89 10.29 Black, non -Hispanic 37.22 34.86 40.19 92.78 81.04 67.18 10.60 Hispanic 27.34 28.45 33.05 92.92 80.41 62.17 11.06 Sian or Pacific Islander, non- Hispanic 37.32 41.90 37.03 92.43 79.82 52.24 10.44 Native American, non -Hispanic 30.92 33.84 37.35 92.65 79.81 61.51 Santa Ana - Population below federal poverty line White, non -Hispanic 36.59 35.69 45.31 92.55 81.75 72.63 10.59 Black, non -Hispanic 30.40 34.66 39.64 91.94 82.25 76.57 10.44 Hispanic 22.21 27.00 30.56 93.36 82.18 60.87 10.98 Sian or Pacific Islander, non- Hispanic 36.22 40.88 35.66 92.11 80.53 46.13 10.05 Native American, non -Hispanic 22.28 21.56 35.82 93.35 79.06 60.67 11.72 Orange County - Total Population White, non -Hispanic 76.48 81.89 74.59 60.92 67.05 46.96 24.39 Black, non -Hispanic 69.50 75.53 68.16 74.64 71.50 44.07 15.23 Hispanic 58.20 67.52 59.65 75.35 73.08 45.50 15.65 Asian or Pacific Islander, non- Hispanic 69.64 76.68 67.46 77.05 70.10 43.85 13.93 Native American, non -Hispanic 68.87 73.43 68.92 69.65 69.78 46.01 19.49 Orange County - Population below federal poverty line White, non -Hispanic 68.31 77.99 69.03 62.05 71.85 49.98 24.26 Black, non -Hispanic 57.08 70.54 60.65 74.14 71.46 42.77 13.74 Hispanic 40.26 56.48 46.97 79.38 77.74 45.63 12.87 sian or Pacific Islander, non- Hispanic 59.82 72.84 58.95 82.14 75.35 40.98 10.57 Native American, Non Hispanic 59.71 78.50 1 58.72 80.71 75.06 48.72 12.85 Source: HUD AFFH Database- Opportunity Indicators, 2020 Opportunity map scores for Orange County census tracts are presented in Figure 34. The central Orange County areas around Santa Ana comprise mostly low and moderate resource tracts and areas of high segregation and poverty. The central Orange County area, including Anaheim and Garden Grove, also has concentrations of low resource areas and some areas of high segregation and poverty. High and highest resource areas are most concentrated in coastal communities from Seal Beach and Huntington Beach to Newport Beach and in the unincorporated community of North Tustin and down towards South County. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Local Trend The HUD Opportunity Indicator scores for Santa Ana are found in Table 9 Similar to the county data, the White population in Santa Ana, including the population below the federal poverty line, received the highest scores in low poverty and labor market participation. However, Asian or Pacific Islander (non -Hispanic) communities, including the population below the federal poverty line, received the highest scores for school proficiency. Hispanic communities above the federal poverty line scored the lowest in low poverty, school proficiency, and labor market participation. Asian or Pacific Islander (non -Hispanic) communities scored the lowest in jobs proximity. Opportunity map scores for Santa Ana census tracts are presented in Figure 35 and Figure 36 along with the City's sites. A majority of the tracts in the city are low to moderate resource tracts. There are pockets of High resource tracts located near the intersection of Bristol St. and 17th St., the tract that houses the entirety of Santa Ana College, and all other High resource tracts are in the cities periphery. There are no tracts in the highest resource category in Santa Ana. Two tracts in the city near the downtown area are classified as areas of high segregation and poverty. AB2011 Sites Inventory A majority of the sites are located in Moderate Resource areas with 60 percent of the affordable units being located in these areas. The location of the sites within resource areas reflect the pattern in the City with a majority of the tracts being moderate resource. The alternative sites are also within or near a specific plan area or General Plan Focus Area. These areas have been identified by the City for higher intensity development. These areas are also undergoing significant levels of reinvestment from both the City and the private sector and may change the level of resource available to residents. As such, they are opportune sites for redevelopment. Moreover, these areas provide housing opportunities for lower income residents in close proximity to amenities, jobs, resources, and mobility options. Table 10 Distribution of Units by Opportunit Affordable Mixed Income Total High Segregation and Poverty 23% 20% 21 % Low Resource 12% 21% 18% Moderate Resource 60% 50% 54% High Resource 5% 9% 8% Total 4,222 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, there is a high number of exempt sites located within a moderate resource area, but this is consistent with the makeup of the entire City. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where there are moderate access to resources. However, with the Alternative sites primarily situated in the central and northern parts of the City, zoning and land use plans encourage multi -family development that could lead to improved conditions for all residents. As a result, these locations are well positioned to attract new investment, especially following the City's goals and policies set forth in the General Plan. The development of these sites has the potential to improve conditions for both new and existing residents, offering additional services and enhancing the quality of life for the entire community. In the City's Opportunity Zone Prospectus from 2021 approximately 22% of Santa Ana is designated as an Opportunity Zone, covering over 3,800 acres across 11 census tracts. These zones include key areas such as Downtown Santa Ana, the Civic Center, and the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center where the Alternative sites have been identified. These opportunity Zones are said to encourage investment in projects that can help improve local infrastructure, housing, and businesses. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 34 — County Opportunity Scores 02512023, '11:21:50 AM 1:19A,3fl3 6 )5 85 0 City_8ountlniy MEModerateResource I COG Geography TCAC,'HCD Opportunity Map - Composite Score (HCD, 2023) - Traci 0 Low Resource D a 6 rz km Highest Resource High segregation & Poverty a.m Ix, a nin, 5— m La e em.. new, HI h Resource cm, uses. evq uPs e®., nene, 6am,n �e oumsu.e:uw g 0 Ho Ga. m,.,momn,.. me oR -mm ,' Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 35 - Opportunity Scores and Affordable Sites 12132024, 147:44 PM 1 63,325 Approved Affordable Ahemelrve S as COG Geography TCACIHCD Opporluni y Majo - Composite Score (HCD, 2023) - Trec Highest Resource High Resource MMerele Resource Law Resaurce 0 High Sogregahon & Poverty 0.5 EMm Es.MMEPR C»mun. GmM. dcpae ir¢. VSei. EW 6r. XERE fnmin, d CMnSMNMa: Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 36— Opportunity Scores and Mixed Income Sites 12/7,2024, 10:05:32 AM 1:73,661 Approved Mixed Income Alternative Sites COG Geography TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map - Highest Resource High Resource ® Moderate Resource Composite Score (HCD, 2023) - Tract 0 Low Resource 0 High Segregation & Poverty o 075 1,5 3ml 0 125 25 5Mm EM, HE. GTanolyInc SG. EGA E., ieRE d OynSlmMp mnWon111wom, —pwnq Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 37— Opportunity Scores and Affordable Exempt Sites 12/712024, 10r28:08 AM 1:73,661 Affordable Exempt Silos ® Moderate Resource a o 75 15 3mi COG Geography TCAC/HCD Opportunity Mep- Composite Scare IHCD, 2023) -Tract 1= Low Resource o 125 25 skm Highest Resource High Segrogatmn & Poverty .1 11 ,.,ar mum High Resource .11 asoa g—m umsmae inc uses, Sw Ev= 41eE trs,tswMlau mnNwws anvue Gs uaw wmnunq Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 38— Opportunity Scores and Mixed Income Exempt Sites 12,712024, 10.42:30 AM 1-73,661 Mixed Income Exempt Sites — klntlerala Reswrce COG Geography TCACIHCD OpporWnity Map -Composite Score (HCD, 2023)-Tract I Low Resource Highest Resource High Segregation A Poverty High Resource 0 075 is 3m1 0 135 25 5km 4q+b.� Buse, cr Imu Fiw mm{ E�n�lieeE mama ceo'r.+n,aoe.., x, ems, � s+n lens. mma o oe+nsv.++nt+p .m �w ... . as.+> oym•+imv Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Economic As described previously, the Fair Housing Task Force calculates economic scores based on poverty, adult education, employment, job proximity, and median home values. See Table 8 for the complete list of TCAC Opportunity Map domains and indicators. Regional Trend As presented in Table 9, in Orange County, White residents have the highest labor market participation, and Hispanic residents have the lowest labor market participation. Figure 39 shows TCAC Opportunity Map economic scores in the Orange County region by tract. Consistent with final TCAC categories, tracts with the highest economic scores are concentrated in coastal communities from the Seal Beach and Huntington Beach to Newport Beach, areas around Irvine, and the unincorporated community of North Tustin. Tracts with economic scores in the lowest quartile are concentrated in central and northern regions of Orange County areas in cities such as Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Westminster, Stanton, Anaheim and Fullerton. Many of the cities in central and northern Orange County, such as Anaheim and Fullerton, historically grew around industries like agriculture, manufacturing, and railroads. The types of jobs these industries provided attracted lower -income workers. Even after the decline of manufacturing and agriculture, many residents remained in these areas due to affordable housing and established community networks. Local Trends As presented in Figure 40, the northeastern corner of the city, along the 1-5, holds the tracts with the highest economic scores, in the third and fourth highest quartiles. As discussed previously, the tracts along the southeastern and southwestern city boundaries consist of mostly industrial and scored in the second lowest quartile for economic opportunity. The block groups along the central and western parts of the city have high concentrations of racial/ethnic minorities, exceeding and scored in the lowest quartile for economic opportunity. Santa Ana was historically affected by redlining and other discriminatory housing practices. These policies prevented racial and ethnic minorities, particularly Latinos, from purchasing homes in wealthier, predominantly white neighborhoods. This forced minority communities to settle in more affordable, less desirable areas, which today corresponds to central and western Santa Ana. AB2011 Sites Inventory A majority of the sites are located in 0.2 to 0.4 economic opportunity score areas with 53 percent of the affordable units being located in these areas. The location of the sites within this level of economic opportunity areas reflect the pattern in the City with a majority of the tracts being in this range. The alternative sites are also within or near a specific plan area or General Plan Focus Area. These areas have been identified by the City for higher intensity development. Specific areas in Downtown are centered around several key developments and initiatives aimed at revitalizing the city and boosting its economic base. Downtown is considered a cultural and economic hub, with efforts to enhance public spaces and foster a vibrant community to attract both residents and businesses. The city is focusing on fostering business clusters in emerging sectors, such as information technology and green businesses, which align with sustainability goals. Santa Ana's economic strategy also encourages local small business development and community -led initiatives to strengthen its diverse economy. These economic revitalization Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 projects not only aim to provide jobs but also improve the overall quality of life, especially in the areas currently lower in economic opportunity scores. Table 11 Distribution of Units by Economic Op 3ortunity Affordable Mixed Income Total 0 - 0.2 4% 4% 4% 0.2 - 0.4 53% 44% 47% 0.4 - 0.6 22% 28% 26% 0.6 - 0.8 22% 23% 23% > 0.8 0% 0% 0% Total 4,222 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, there is a high number of exempt sites located within lower economic score areas, but this is consistent with the makeup of the entire City, like many other factors. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where there are lower in economic opportunity scores. However, with the Alternative sites primarily situated in the central and northern parts of the City, zoning and land use plans encourage multi -family development that could lead to improved conditions for all residents. Santa Ana has implemented a variety of economic and housing initiatives aimed at revitalizing its downtown area and supporting this kind community growth. The city aims to enhance downtown as a mixed -income, transit -oriented hub with affordable housing options for all income levels. In the City's General Plan a key policy is to also encourage the creation of "complete communities" where residents have access to housing, services, and amenities within walkable mixed -use neighborhoods. These efforts, combined with historic preservation and proactive tenant protection policies, are designed to make downtown Santa Ana a vital hub for the community. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 39 — County Economic Scores I0l25/2023, 12:24:14PM 1:198,393 O City Boundary O>0.4-0.6 6 1.16 3E /ml COG Geography TCAC/l ICO Opportunity Map- Economlc Score(HCD, 2023)- Tract _>0.6-0.8 6 3 6 12 kin - 0 - 0.2 (Less Positive Economic Outcomes) > 0.8 -'I (More Positive Economic Outcomes) r" "11 m ms wove., auoou m land t/enegmrenv En, HERE, Cam ll t8G5, EPA, NPS. so, HERE, G m. 0 plxn9ml!rW4 10.2 -0.4 corftw.�nM Inn GS—co.—l" Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 40 — Economic Scores and Affordable Sites Appmved Allomahle Aaernatna Srles u-04-05 U 01 i COG Geography TCACIHCO Opportunity Map- Economic Score(HCO, 2023)-Trea 06-0.8 o t a km 0 -0 2 (Less PosVve Economic Outcomes) a 0 8 - t (Mora Positive Economic Outcomes) w.m� ar ms ayebe, aven� a tau na..am.w - - 0.2 -0.4 ft E@ssrei, XFRNEre.m., amru.,,on —11�us ury mmm�m� Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 41 — Economic Scores and Mixed Income Sites 12l//2024, 10:06:09 Aid 1 73 u61 Approved Mixed Income Alternative Sites L _J > 0A —0.6 COG Geography TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map- Economic Score (HCD, 2023) -Tract - > 0.6-0.8 0 — 0 2 (Less Positive Economic Outcomes) > 0.8— 1 (More Positive Economic Outcomes) > 0.2 — 0.4 o 075 1.5 30 0 125 25 5Mm cu.nry m �. �H,, — m u. ea,a M HERE , 1 EERE, Gvmi��q �v Irc., u5G5. CmnSureglap mn1��EUMs anvlM GlS ufwmnnm�Ay Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 42 — Economic Scores and Affordable Exempt Sites 12r7l2024, 10:28:40AM 1:73,661 Affordable rzempl Silea =>0.4-0$ 0.is 15 3m1 COG Geogmphy TCACIHCO Opporumb, Map -Economic Score(HCO, 2023)-Tract->0.6-0.8 0 12s 25 ekm 0 - 0 2 (Lose PGenive Economic outcomes) > 0 8 - 1 (More Positive Economic outcomes) w a, e, ae-, n une ewemn,nn, > 0.2- D A fxn H eP Gann. C OeC'QIN e i JSGE. EW. Exi, HERE. GVMn. K PonSbeeMiap ' mneaew.uw ine Giswmrvnenny Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 43 — Economic Scores and Mixed Income Exempt Sites 12 7/2024. 10 42:56 AM 173,661 � Mixmf Inrnme Fxnmpt Sims =>04-05 119 1 5 3m[ COG Geography TCACIHCD Opportunity Map- Economic Score(HCD, 2023i- Tract ->0.6-0.8 o 125 zs sFm 0 - 0.2 (Less Positive Economic Outcomes) > 0 8 - 1 (More Positive Economic Outcomes) > EePanPw4n, , uwEN.Ira. x.,e.1 E-11 ^ um' 0.2 - 0.4 Es, HERE, Ts c .R lEPE .., R,yn.A... a<.1m1..m p W leG].., . [wnpur'AY Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Education As described above, the Fair Housing Task Force determines education scores based on math and reading proficiency, high school graduation rates, and student poverty rates. See Table 8 for the complete list of TCAC Opportunity Map domains and indicators. Regional Trend As presented in Table 9, White Orange County communities are located closest to the highest quality school systems, and Hispanic communities are typically located near lower quality school systems. TCAC Opportunity Map education scores for the region are shown in Figure 43. The central county areas, namely the cities of Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Anaheim, and Stanton, have the highest concentration of tracts with education scores in the lowest percentile. There is also a concentration of tracts with low education scores in Costa Mesa and some scattered tracts in Westminster and Huntington Beach. Coastal communities and areas near Irvine and the unincorporated community of North Tustin have the highest education scores. Local Trend Figure 43 shows TCAC education scores for Santa Ana tracts. Tracts in Santa Ana generally received education Scores consistent with economic scores discussed above. A majority of the residential tracts in the city scored in the lowest quartile (scores below 0.25), while the northwestern corner of the city, where tracts received higher economic opportunity scores, only scored slightly better, with education scores in the second lowest education score quartile. However, tracts along the western city boundary were also slightly better, with scores in the second lowest education quartile and one tract scoring in the second highest quartile (scores of 0.50 to 0.75), which is the highest scoring tract in the city. According to the City's Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services team, community members have continually expressed that two primary factors directly affect their children's ability to learn and excel in school —overcrowding and lack of youth -targeted community spaces and programs. Overcrowding was cited as affecting youth education through there not being the physical space needed within the home for a child to concentrate and do their work. Often unpermitted subdivisions of common living areas in units are constructed to accommodate additional family members, leaving little to no space for a child to sit and study. Community members expressed that the lack of community spaces and programs further put those children that reside in overcrowded households at a disadvantage by not providing spaces where youth can study and engage in enrichment programs. According to residents, neighborhoods such as Cedar Evergreen, Townsend-Raitt, and Willard, where there is a strong gang presence, would benefit from providing spaces for youth, after -school programs, and strategies to keep students from dropping out. The correlation between overcrowding and less positive education outcomes that was voiced by the community can be observed when comparing Figure 43 and Figure 68. The areas with less positive education outcome scores in Santa Ana are generally the same areas that have higher percentages of overcrowded households. Similarly, the tracts in the northwestern corner of the city and tracts along the western boundary, where education outcome scores are higher, are the same tracts where there are less overcrowded households. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT AB2011 Sites Inventory As discussed above, tracts in Santa Ana mainly scored in the lowest quartile (scores below 0.25), but there are a few exceptions in the northwestern corner of the city, where tracts received higher economic opportunity scores, only scored slightly better. In the City's General Plan there are policies in place to address educational inequities, including partnerships between the city and educational institutions to improve resources for marginalized groups. There are efforts to integrate technology into schools to close the digital divide and ensure that students have access to necessary learning tools that would increase the education scores over time. Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Again, the entire City having lower educations scores shows the investment needed in education for all residents in the City Conclusion With the Alternative sites primarily situated in the central and northern parts of the City, zoning and land use plans encourage multi -family development that could lead to improved conditions for all residents. The City aims to increase its education opportunity scores through a range of strategies focused on equity, infrastructure improvements, and support for students at all levels and have goals and policies in the General Plan to help accomplish this. One important note is infrastructure improvements that are being targeted in the Downtown and the South Coast Metro Area. By improving access to technology, particularly for students in underserved areas with infrastructure improvements such as high-speed internet, the City can help ensure that all students can engage in learning, both in school and at home. As stated in the General Plan, the City is striving to create more equitable educational opportunities for all residents. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 44 — Education Scores 1:144.448 City/Town Boundatles ®0.50-075 1 t25 2,5 fim, (R) TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021) - Education Score -Tract - 10.75 (More Posldve Education Outcomes) 0 2.26 45 9 K. 0.25 (Less Poslllve Educalton OLltoomes) J No Data c..rml m Ins Anal., B-1 a Inea rowe3emem, El, HERE Gennln, u6; .A, NPS Esc NEaE, mnnne. Y Ulm V ¢er!.4p 0.25 - 0.50 orlr arlm.,. mra m[cE, Arm �o-r+mrrak cA TT Cw[n/41w Any[In6+neau a!L.no Nan[kenAEsrl. XEPE,Gxmir U'v'G5.EPA, rFIPleft,ks2:I. MlG 20191R.Wu. 2UI HV 20SE I PlxPpb NZI.ESRI.U5,C—wIPIwml:*"Wl TCAC 20M I PlxWk, NMI. Ll 5 G1M 1[t HAv[m9 eM 11.9ar. D-I.neIMIErr, Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Environmental TCAC environmental health scores are determined by the Fair Housing Task Force based on 12 of the indicators that are used in the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment's (OEHHA) CalEnviroScreen 4.0 tool under the "exposures" and "environmental effect" subcomponents of the "pollution burden" domain. The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 tool considers (1) environmental factors such as pollutant exposure, groundwater threats, toxic sites, and hazardous materials exposure and (2) sensitive receptors, including seniors, children, persons with asthma, and low birth weight infants. Socioeconomic factors include educational attainment, linguistic isolation, poverty, and unemployment. Based on the environmental pollution and population indicators, the CalEnviroScreen ranks census tracts on a statewide level. A community or area that ranks in the 75th percentile statewide (25 percent worst) or above is considered a "disadvantaged community." Disadvantaged or "EX communities have been identified as communities that are disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution. Regional Trends Asian or Pacific Islanders (non -Hispanic) residents countywide are most likely to experience adverse environmental health conditions, while White residents are the least likely. The central part of the county, in the areas generally around 1-5 have the lowest environmental TCAC scores (see Figure 45). The central Orange County cities of Santa Ana, Orange, and Anaheim all have concentrations of tracts with environmental scores in the lowest quartile. Tracts with the highest environmental scores are in western parts of the county (i.e., Cypress and west Anaheim), coastal cities (i.e., Seal Beach, Huntington Beach, and Newport Beach), and around the inland community of El Toro. CalEnviroScreen scores for the county generally follow a similar pattern to the TCAC scores, with the central Orange County cities having census tracts with greater environmental burdens than coastal areas (Figure 34). Local Trends TCAC environmental scores by tract in Santa Ana are shown in Figure 46 and Figure 47 as well as the location of Affordable sites and Mixed Income Sites respectively. Tracts in the central and western parts of the City received environmental scores in the second and third highest quartiles, while the tracts located along or in close proximity to the freeways (1-5, 1-405, and SR-55) that traverse the city, generally along the eastern and southern boundaries, received scores in the lowest quartile. No tracts in the city received an environmental score in the highest quartile. According to CalEnviroScreen, 26 census tracts in Santa Ana are disadvantaged communities, these tracts represent the 25% highest scoring census tracts in CalEnviroScreen 4.0. These tracts or Disadvantaged communities are located in the southeastern part of the city along an industrial corridor that parallels the SR-55, around the downtown area south of the 1-5, in the city's central core going westward to its boundary, and in the southwestern part of the city, which also has a large industrial land use base. The location of Disadvantaged census tracts closely follows the historic development pattern of the city, proximity to freeways, and adjacency to industrial uses. The oldest portions of the city, located in and around the downtown area, that were developed when planning and environmental laws were not what they are today, tend to suffer from a disproportionate burden of environmental pollution. For example, the Logan neighborhood, the City's earliest Mexican and Mexican - American neighborhood located northeast of downtown, is currently bounded by railroad tracks, Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT the 1-5 freeway, and industrial uses. While the railroad lines facilitated the initial growth of the neighborhood in the late 1800s, they also physically split the community from the rest of Santa Ana and encouraged past City officials to designate Logan for industrial uses despite opposition from residents. The construction of the 1-5 freeway in the 1950s removed a number of single- family homes in the northeastern portion of the neighborhood and created a barrier between the community and the formerly open orchards. A 1970s proposal to bulldoze the neighborhood in order to expand an arterial highway along Civic Center Drive would have bisected and destroyed the community. Neighborhood leaders were successful in opposing this proposal and saved what was left of the neighborhood. Today, due to the proximity of the 1-5 freeway, the railroad tracks, and the lasting legacy of industrial uses, Logan is within a census tract with one of the highest CalEnviroScreen scores in Santa Ana. Community members voiced concerns stemming from air pollution from the freeway, industrial uses, cemetery, and soil lead contamination most likely stemming from historical leaded -gasoline use and lead -based paint. The disproportionate burden of environmental pollution facing certain communities in Santa Ana is being addressed in the City's General Plan. The Disadvantaged communities' census tracts coincide with the Environmental Justice (EJ) communities identified by the City in the General Plan with an addition of two census tracts. The City undertook a multiyear effort to engage EJ communities and listen to their experiences and issues regarding environmental health and quality of life. Planning staff facilitated a multifaceted outreach campaign culminating with a series of workshops in the Spring of 2021 (January through May). The campaign consisted of numerous community meetings, a multilingual EJ Survey (electronic and hard copy), and 10 virtual and 1 in - person community forums, each focusing on a specific EJ area in the city. Feedback received during the outreach campaign can be generally grouped into the following categories: improving air and water quality; improving public city facilities; improving infrastructure; providing healthy food options; providing safe and sanitary housing; increasing physical activity; and fostering civic engagement. The City has documented these environmental impacts to ensure alignment of mitigating policies, require appropriate remediation with other State agencies (e.g., Department of Toxic Control Substances), and direct investments to burdened communities as part of the new policies in the comprehensive General Plan. In total, 78 actions spread throughout the 11 elements in the General Plan and will directly lead to working with the community, neighborhood associations, advocacy groups, and community leaders to address environmental justice issues facing the Santa Ana community. As of July 1, 2022, the name of the Neighborhood Initiatives Program changed to the Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) program. The program continues to provide capacity -building support, project consultation and acts as a connector between neighborhoods, communities, public and regulatory agencies, and the City. NIES functions are to promote community solutions, capacity building, and civic engagement in addressing environmental justice challenges within the City as identified in the General Plan. NIES will champion the important work and collaboration ahead regarding the framework and next steps for the implementation phases that focus on improving the environmental health, sustainability, and quality of life for disadvantaged communities and the overall City of Santa Ana. AB2011 Sites Inventory A majority of the sites are located in tracts with environmental scores of 60 through 80, which accounts for a majority of the City. Even with this being the case the City has a very proactive NIES team as described above and the General Plan with 78 actions to address environmental Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT justice. With the majority of the City affected by environmental burdens, having a committed team to address those is the most important factor in ensuring a safe and equitable place for all to live. Table 12 Distribution of Units and CalEnviroScreen Scores Affordable Mixed Income Total 0-20 0% 0% 0% 20-40 0% 1% 0% 40 - 60 5% 9% 7% 60 - 80 52% 48% 49% 80-100 44% 43% 43% Total 4,222 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, there is a high number of exempt sites located within higher environmental score areas, but this is consistent with the makeup of the entire City, like many other factors. However, regardless of the location of housing in Santa Ana, the City has goals and policies in place to help address environmental burdens. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where there are environmental burdens. However, with the Alternative sites primarily situated in the central and northern parts of the City, zoning and land use plans encourage multi -family development that could lead to improved conditions for all residents. The City and the NIES team has been actively addressing environmental justice through a range of policies and initiatives designed to mitigate pollution, improve public health, and promote sustainability, particularly in the underserved communities that bear the brunt of environmental hazards. With the use of CalEnviroScreen data, the NIES team can create targeted initiatives in areas like Downtown to create a healthier, more equitable living environment for all residents. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 45— County Ca/EnviroScreen CalEnviro5creen 4 0 (OEHHA, 2021) - Tract — > 40 - 60 0 -20 (More positive environmental factors) ! , 60 80 ® > 20 - 40 > 80 - 100 (Mare negative environmental factors) 1:150,- 1 25 la km Gmtoe law l Erq HEREG—. USw, EF4!9E, HERE, wpm.. s cuse.nrea r�orem». a�a me ol= Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 46— CalEnviroScreen and Affordable Sites L1 � ere.n va meJ c.�ow aea q eF Ave iyn.Gw.. Ems'•' ra4r Hiy'i in on- v49 PEJ` ny a f^ ne 9M iW E Mi C]e Pw E k♦ V n'F7••1�11 �� C" I'N � M m4 i f1-' 1 ♦av'ow ��r �'�� . 1175i SY. n rn.IMN'4 ry - f-G- 4F 1 Tql Aw. MveAITT 1w _ y I e v_�., r•.s 12f32024, 3:50.19 PM Approved Affordable Allornative511as ._--40.60 OelEnvimScreen 4.0(OEHHA, 2021)-Tract-_1'60-80 0 - 20 (More positive environmental factors) - > 80. 100 (More no0ative environmental factors) ®>20-40 1 63,325 0 0s 0 4Fm c...rc er wa aroX=v e,aA. u mw n..Je,.e,�. Evv XEPE, forme. Gwietnidb ea in .. 1545. EC4 EnA NEAE Wn4n, Oyn4:aeJAaJ acnl,iCulma, am Pe (15usa ttmmunAY Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 47— Ca/EnviroScreen and Mixed Income Sites 12r72024, %07:00 AM 1:73,661 Approved Mixed Income Alternative Slles U , 40 - 60 0 0 75 15 3 mi CelEnviroScreen 4.0(OEHHA, 2021)-Tract -,80-80 u 125 25 r,km 0 - 20 (More positive environmental factors) - , 80 . 100 (Mare negative environmental factors) .1.10 L. anen.. ®� 20-40 Eel aE E' tea' c`-o1' ndW "x..`smmsr' wn4YYpteaim Ne 615 a �inA� Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 48 — CalEnviroScreen and Affordable Exempt Sites 12r//2024, 10:29:20 AM 1:7s661 Affordable Exempt Sites ' 40 CalEnvlro5creen 4.0(OEHHA, 2021)-Tract ®�60 0 - 20 (Mare positive environmental factors) - > 80 ®>20-40 B0 so 100 (More negativa environmental factors) a 0,75 1.5 3mi 0 I35 A 5W �=N a roe mmm. a,r..�� m r.e.. rn.welrba. M X'Ir IERE GeoTeclitlq^ee [.. U!C 1 EFA —, 11P f" S trAn9:eeN4P rnlriuulwaarW lne GlS uermm'unilV Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 49 — CalEnviroScreen and Mixed Income Exempt Sites 12172024, 10 43 23 AM 173,661 • Mixed Inmme F.uempl sJee > 40 - 60 a 0,75 1.5 3 ml CalEnviroScreen 4.0(OEHHA. 2021)-Tract '60-80 0 1z5 as 5km 0 - 20 (More poslOve onvironmental lectors) - 80 � 100 (More negalrve environmental factors) o , 11. axle., .—. er m.+.xr.�,.ea ® - 20-40 evc eu; eae. aa�m..uxo Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Transportation HUD's Job Proximity Index, shown in Table 9, can be used to show transportation needs geographically. Block groups with lower jobs proximity indices are located further from employment opportunities and have a higher need for transportation. Availability of efficient, affordable transportation can be used to measure fair housing and access to opportunities. SCAG developed a mapping tool for High Quality Transit Areas (HQTA) as part of the Connect SoCal 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). SCAG defines HQTAs as areas within one-half mile from a major transit stop and a high -quality transit corridor. This section also utilizes All Transit metrics to identify transportation opportunities in Orange County and Santa Ana. Regional Trend All Transit explores metrics that reveal the social and economic impact of transit, specifically looking at connectivity, access to jobs, and frequency of service. Orange County's All Transit Performance score is 4.2, compared to the cities of Orange (5.1), Garden Grove (5.5), Anaheim (4.9) Tustin (4.8), and Costa Mesa (5.4). Orange County All Transit metrics are shown in Figure 50. The County's All Transit score indicates a low combination of trips per week and number of jobs accessible, enabling few people to take transit to work. All Transit estimates 99.0 percent of jobs and 87.4 percent of workers in Orange County are located within '/ a mile from transit. Figure 50 — Orange County Transit Score p i• \vl , Show Transl[Pgerrles{33j 4 !O`yy .l�reca�Cc-.�_+_1�Nnvra in map Overall transit sca re that looks at wnnectivi[g aaeu to jobs, aM Irequenq of servke ■.1 M1-2 024 M45 es5 0.7 Zi 3. As shown in Figure 52, block groups around southern and eastern Santa Ana, northern Costa Mesa, Irvine, Newport Beach, and Orange have the highestjobs proximity index scores, indicating employment opportunities are most accessible in these areas. Central county areas, from central to western Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Westminster, Stanton, and parts of Huntington Beach have the lowest jobs proximity index scores. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Local Trend All Transit metrics for Santa Ana are shown in Figure 51. Santa Ana received an All Transit Performance Score of 6.6, indicating a moderate combination of trips per week and number of jobs accessible by transit. Santa Ana's score is higher than the county as a whole and is or near the highest in the county. All Transit estimates that 100 percent of jobs and 99.9 percent of workers in Santa Ana are within '/ a mile from transit. Figure 51 — Santa Ana Transit Score �..1 3howTIrWtA,�6. (3) overall MI-2 M24 lhat looks al c&7 U7-9-access tojohs,and freyuengofse,Nre ■<1 ■t-2 �Y-0 �45 ■Sd ■b) hlz9 'i9* As shown in Figure 53, census blocks in the southern, eastern, and northern parts of Santa Ana received the highest jobs proximity index scores, exceeding 80, indicating that employment opportunities are very accessible in large parts of the city, with the exceptions being the central and western parts of the city, which scored in the lowest and second lowest quartiles. Additionally, nearly all of Santa Ana, with a few exceptions, is considered an HQTA (Figure 51). AB2011 Sites Inventory All sites are in areas with access to high quality transit. The General Plan uses HQTA principles to guide policies that will lead to a more sustainable urban growth. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area parallels the OC Streetcar route, Orange County's first modern streetcar that will run 4.15 miles and connect to the regional train network by way of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, offering multi -modal mobility options and residential development opportunities along the streetcar stations. Many, if not all of the sites in the City center will be serviced by this new mode of transportation offered for residents. Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, the exempt sites are also well serviced by public transit. However, the location of the exempt sites Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT are in areas where there are less jobs within a 45 minute transit ride, but not much less than other areas of the City. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where there is adequate access to public transit. However, with the Alternative sites primarily situated in the central and northern parts of the City, there are more opportunities to use public transit. This will also be evident when the OC Street Car is completed. Overall, transportation and access to jobs is relatively high. As of the most recent data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and local economic reports, Santa Ana is home to a diverse job market across various industries. While the exact number of jobs can fluctuate over time, Santa Ana typically has around 150,000 to 170,000 jobs. A larger number of these jobs are in Government and Public Administration. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 52 — County Proximity to Jobs M Jobs within 45 min Iranslt ride iSmart Locabons Dalabase, 2018) . Block Group = 10,001 - 25.000 11. Data 25,001- 50.000 1 - 2, 500 50,001 - 100,00] 2,501 - 5.000 M 100,001 .250,010 - 5,001 - 10.000 => 250000 e� cny�4mm 1:150.454 0 15 J 6ml 0 25 5 10 km Esn, XEFE Game, USGS, EN, uY+, Ev.. HEREERE, GamYn�nU ppenS�wttbp N,vie+Cv, inv pe GIS ueer uHly Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 53 — Proximity to Jobs and Affordable Sites 121312024, 3:51:27 PM 163,325 0 Approved Affordable Alternative Sites 10,001 25,000 Jobs udmin 45 rate transit ride (Smart Locations Database, 2018) -Block Group - 25,001- 50,000 He Data 50,001 - 100,000 1 .2,500 100,001-250,000 2 501 5.000 � 250,000 0.5 4km wm,r a ko: WyHec a..,. m raa xa�pm�n, PA EHERE riEaOwTttnylp9es ., 1505, m�mry �e0 mmrnA OCeiSCttNbo ��rou ai 5uxr n9y Eewl F M F�jm0M0&SIOW ATTACHMENT Figure 54 — Proximity to Jobs and Mixed Income Sites 12O/2024, 10:07:42AM 1:73,661 Approved Mixed Income Alternative Sues W 10,001 - 25.000 Jobs within 45 min transit ride (Smart Locations Database, 2018) -Block Group - 25,001-50,000 — IJa Data 50.001 - 100,000 1 -2,500 2.501 ..5,000 100,001 - 250,000 > 250,000 n nil 1s ]m� 0 125 25 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 55 — Proximity to Jobs and Affordable Exempt Sites UM2024, 1029:47 ANI 1:73.661 P ABnr6ahle Exempt Sites = 10,001 - 25000 Jobv within 45 min transit title (Smart Locations Database. 20181- Block Group - 25,001 - 50,000 Ito Data 50.001- 100,000 1 - 2.500 100.001- 250,000 2,501 . 5,000 > 250p00 0 75 _25 1 25 , h Twq d laM 4v'a csGS. EwIMXERE Gamun, GwMllntlayvs In[, e5G5, EPA Esn „FAEc Gami�. S^ OpnSpvnMap nu �. un If e m M Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 56— Proximity to Jobs and Mixed Income Exempt Sites 12172024, 10:43:46AM 1:73.661 • Mixed Income Fxempl Saes = 10,001 - 75,000 Jobs wiNin 45 min transit ride (Smart Locations Database, 2018) - Block Group - 25,001- 50,000 No Dala 50,001 - 100,000 1 -2,500 100,001- 250,000 ® 2,501 - 5,000 > 250, D00 0 0,5 15 ]col a 125 25 SNm Gamry d E. Ngeles, Pwveu 91aM Marvpement E.. ebn Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 1.8 Disproportionate Housing Needs Housing problems in Santa Ana were calculated using HUD's 2023 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data based on the 2016-2020 ACS. Table 13 breaks down households by race, ethnicity, and presence of housing problems for Santa Ana and Orange County households. The following conditions are considered housing problems: • Substandard Housing (measured by incomplete plumbing or kitchen facilities) • Overcrowding (more than 1 person per room) • Cost burden (housing costs greater than 30 percent) In Santa Ana, 42.9 percent of owner -occupied households and 72.46 percent of renter households have one or more housing problems. The City has a larger proportion of owner and renter households with a housing problem compared to the county, where 32.6 percent of owner households experience a housing problem, and 59.1 percent of renter households experience a housing problem. In Santa Ana, Asian renter households experience a housing problem at the highest rate at 81 percent. Hispanic renter households also experience housing problems at a higher rate at 77.2 percent than the city average of 72 percent. Hispanic owner households also experience housing problems at a higher rate at 49.5 percent than the city average of 42.9 percent. Table 13 Housing Problems by Race/Ethnicit Santa Ana Orange County Owner Renter Owner Renter White 2,330 2,965 98,795 90,356 Black 135 355 2,270 6,600 Asian 2,530 4,140 45,700 45,650 American Indian 10 10 245 335 Pacific Islander 29 35 305 815 Hispanic 1 10,585 23,430 42,380 3,949 Other 86 -- 4,360 3,949 All 15,705 30,835 194,055 262,960 Source: HUD CHAS Data (based on 2016-2020 ACS) Note: -- = 0 households In category. Cost Burden Households are considered cost burdened if housing costs exceed 30 percent of their gross income for housing and severely cost burdened if housing costs exceed 50 percent of their gross income. Cost burden in Santa Ana and Orange County is assessed using 2023 HUD CHAS data (based on 2016-2020 ACS estimates) and the HCD Data Viewer (based on 2017-2021 ACS estimates). Regional Trend Cost burden by tenure and race/ethnicity for Orange County is shown in Table 14. Approximately 39 percent of Orange County households are cost burdened, including 29.5 percent of owner - occupied households and 51.3 percent of renter -occupied households. Hispanic renter Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 households have the highest rate of cost burden-55.7 percent. Non -Hispanic American Indian and non -Hispanic White owner households have the lowest rate of cost burden, 19.3 percent and 27.9 percent, respectively. Cost burden is more common among renter households than owner households regardless of race or ethnicity. Table 14 Cost Burden by Race/Ethnicity and Tenure: Orange Count Cost Burdened 0 o Severely Cost Burdened Total Households Owner -Occupied White, non -Hispanic 53,125 42,775 344,165 Black, non -Hispanic 1,485 745 5,765 Asian, non -Hispanic 22,425 18,240 128,995 American Indian, non -Hispanic 70 150 1,140 Pacific Islander, non -Hispanic 220 75 1040 Hispanic 19,150 12,820 100,095 Other 2,345 1,670 13,580 Renter -Occupied White, non -Hispanic 44,895 46,055 186,945 Black, non -Hispanic 2,700 3,440 11,800 Asian, non -Hispanic 17,600 21,575 78,585 American Indian, non -Hispanic 100 180 775 Pacific Islander, non -Hispanic 315 310 1,425 Hispanic 41,785 42,680 151,625 Other 3,120 3,185 13.625 Source: HUD CHAS Data (based on 2016-2020 ACS) Figure 57 and Figure 58 show concentrations of cost burdened owners and renters by tract for the region. Tracts with high concentrations of cost burdened owners are generally dispersed throughout the county. However, there is a higher prevalence of tracts with higher percentages of cost burdened owners and renters in central Orange County compared to the coastal areas. In most tracts in coastal areas from Seal Beach to Newport Beach, 20 percent to 60 percent of owners are cost burdened. Tracts where more than 60 percent of renters are cost burdened are most concentrated in the central county areas around Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Santa Ana, Garden Grove and Anaheim. Local Trend Cost burden by tenure in Santa Ana based on HUD CHAS data is shown in Table 15. Approximately 42 percent of households in the city are cost burdened, including 30.1 percent of owner -occupied households and 52 percent of renter -occupied households. Further, 24.3 percent of renter households in Santa Ana are severely cost burdened. The renter -occupied rate of Santa Ana is over 10 percentage points' higher than that of Orange County at 52.8 percent and 42.8 percent. Non -Hispanic American Indian and Black renter -occupied households have the highest rate of cost burden in the city at 100 percent and 58.3 percent, respectively. Like the county as a whole, cost burden is more common in renter households. Non -Hispanic American Indian and Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT non -Hispanic White households have the lowest rate of owner -occupied cost burden at 15.4 percent and 28.1 percent, respectively. More households as a percentage are cost burdened in Santa Ana compared to the county. Table 15 Cost Burden b ace Ethnicity and Tenure, Santa Ana Cost Burdened 30%-5091 Severely Cost Burdened 50% I Total Households Owner -Occupied White, non -Hispanic 1,350 910 8,050 Black, non -Hispanic 95 45 375 Asian, non -Hispanic 1,050 860 6,395 American Indian, non -Hispanic 0 10 65 Pacific Islander, non -Hispanic 25 0 40 Hispanic 3,975 2,625 21,385 Other 50 - 30 285 Renter -Occupied White, non -Hispanic 1,240 1,120 6,000 Black, non -Hispanic 160 190 600 Asian, non -Hispanic 1,085 1,305 5,055 American Indian, non -Hispanic 10 0 10 Pacific Islander, non -Hispanic 20 10 90 Hispanic 9,175 7,630 30,330 Other 150 65 465 Source: HUD CHAS Data based on 2016-2020 ACS Figure 59, Figure 60, Figure 61, and Figure 62 show concentrations of cost burden by tract in Santa Ana. High rates of cost burdened owner occupied tracts are located southeast of the downtown in the vicinity of the intersection of Grand and Edinger Avenues as well as north of downtown in the vicinity of Main and 17th St. While large portions of the area in the vicinity of Grand and Edinger Avenues are industrial, there are residential uses in the census tracts along the western edge of the concentration of cost burden. Concentrations of cost burdened renter - occupied tracts are located in the northeast area of the city bordering the cities of Garden Grove and Orange. Another area of cost burden concentration is along the southern boundary, north of the South Coast Plaza regional mall in Costa Mesa. Owner -occupied cost burdened tracts are more dispersed throughout the city, but almost all renter occupied tracts in Santa Ana are cost burdened. Santa Ana has a large population of foreign -born residents - 42 percent of the city's population is foreign born compared to 30 percent countywide (2017-2021 ACS). Research shows that many immigrant households, particularly those with limited English skills, earn lower incomes than later generations. This increases the difficulty of finding adequate and affordable housing and exacerbates cost burden. Community members have expressed that difficulty in finding adequate and affordable housing is compounded for residents who are undocumented because many housing assistance programs require proof of legal residency. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 AB2011 Sites Inventory As discussed above, approximately 48.1 percent of households overpay for housing in all Santa Ana tracts. Figure 59 and Figure 60 show where cost burdened owners are in relation to sites. The distribution of units for the sites by cost burdened renters is shown in Table 16. A majority of the units are in tracts where 40 percent to 60 percent of renters overpay for housing. As shown in Figure 61 and Figure 62, between 40 percent and 80 percent of renters are cost burdened in a majority of the City. The locations of the sites do not exacerbate existing conditions as they do not demolish any existing units and are located in areas designated for redevelopment that avoid potential negative externalities that may cause rent increases. Moreover, the locations of the sites have the potential to improve existing conditions through providing additional housing options at all affordability levels and driving rents down as more options become available to renters and owners alike. Table 16 Distribution of Units b Renter Over a ment Affordable Mixed Income Total 20-40% 0% 4% 3% 40-60% 78% 80% 80% 60-80% 22% 15% 17% 80-100% 0% 0% 0% Total 1 4,222 1 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, the exempt sites are in areas where there is cost burden. This of course is not surprising with the current economic climate. The City however, with the Alternative sites and other housing developments, is working toward providing housing affordable to all. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where residents are affected by cost burden. Santa Ana has a large population of low and moderate income households, many of whom work in service industries, retail, or other essential but lower -wage jobs. For these households, the high cost of housing consumes a large portion of their income. Santa Ana is working to expand affordable housing options by encouraging the development of mixed income housing, especially in the Focus Areas. The Alternative sites for both affordable and mixed income are in areas where there are targeted initiatives in place in order to facilitate the development of all types of housing. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 57— County Overpayment by Homeowners 11i8i2023, 10.5801 AM 1 183,496 0 City Boundary W 40%. GG 0 175 35 7ml Overpayment by Homeovmers(ACS, 2017-2021)-Tract=Go%-80% 0 275 55 11km c 20% 80% cwry d w ayes.. eleeau a une waw emem, EV. HERE Garman. USGS EPA HIM E . HERE Gomm, a 0—.a mrkt p 20^ra - aG°o wn4lvmvn. am rneG15 user vwmmunay Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 58 — County Overpayment by Renters =s J In QR �' pati�W%E an 1116/2023. 10-50P.15 AM City_Boundafy 40% 60 % Overpayment 5y Renters (ACS, 2017-2021) -Trap - 60%- 80 % a 20% > 80% ® 20%-40 % 9JTTJ] M 227 4 35 1 �Icm Caumy N tm Angews. sumo N. Nanag ll. E$4, HERE Gar I,, USGS, EPA. NP5, E HERE, Wmn. E gm94nf..pp ��ma n.,. ,na m. ci s ux� :omn•�.m Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 59 — Overpayment by Homeowners and Affordable Sites 1213r7024, 4:02A9 Pht 1:03325 Approved Affordable Alternative Sites - 40 % - 60 % Overpayment by Homeowners (AOS, 2017-2021) -Tract - 60%- 00 % �-20% W ® 20%-40% o as t zml a 1 2 km G.. em, cl Lar2 Mvammanl Es 1M 1,. i1RE Ge:TMrMopes. Ir.[. E 6n, 111E. Gamin, 2 aPo�heeMaO [v.i�auva sulne Giaura+ammunry Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 60— Overpayment by Homeowners and Mixed Income Sites - L, J ? l..i :,•�.L., _ d Min 113 aj ` —17, I � o• To � 1 'J7_uw -..a. �3MALal ,an I n tea". L I t'i�G.,] Y LxWi tr VS l] r t < . N 121712024, 10'08:49 AM a Approved Mixed Income Alternative Sites 40% - 60 % Overpayment by Homeowners (ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract - 60%- 80 % 0 < 20% > 80% ® 20%-40% 1 73,e61 rI5 1S ]mi 5 n t25 2 5 5xn ESM1 HE. Wmm, OwTamdcge% eo. Im JSG.Ge, FP4 EllnV rEflE. Wmen. Y+ Open9veNl.la[ mnNnubie, aw Ne G�6 um ¢xmmwey Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 61 — Overpayment by Renters and Affordable Sites 12/3,2024, 4:03:47 PM 1:63.326 AppmeBAffcrrinMe Altemalty Sites _40%-80% p 05 1 3mi Overpayment by Renters (ACS, 2017-2021) -Tract _ 60%- 80% 0 1 22 4 tm 20% > 80% ® 20%-40% EWvm , HERE Gn, froTettuWapn I.rm..tI5O5, EV4, @!4 nTPP. Wrmin. D OWnS'✓ea10.fi0 wnNNbi. VDPe G'S w[r xiNnunTy Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 62 — Overpayment by Renters and Mixed Income Sites f3'.Tnfl?r vcsltln'�- — sYi� �-nGrAtn iowi r,re " - 1217'1024. 10:09:57 AM ° Approved Moms Income Alterna0ve Sites 40%-60% Overpayment by Renters (ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract - 60% _ 80% 0 �20% 580% ® 20%-40% i a ':uJu•.w.uu � IT 2 / I/ v a � M � n IJJVV.. 1'73,Go1 C ran I -. l m1 a 125 ... 5km Em; .Ir XE� nE GnT¢mralq.eo, in. 0.5G5. EPA E. , alM1, ea�m'n. R e:anWttRAaP u ruulwa, anPl4i5 wa,unrmunn; Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 63 — Overpayment by Homeowners and Affordable Exempt Sites a gad. V 1a15 eJ t� e i" ,,v, aa�y mme v xAeu' �i •� �, I% �� ILIIIYLLL��I �¢z� � 5 � - VIIIJJG'J 4^„c ym mry,� ; 1r V 1: i� �`[<. J )�• a 12/12024, 10:30:27Ab1 Affordable Exempt Sites 40%-60% Overpayment by Homeavners (ACS, 2017-2021) - Tract - 60%- 80% 0 < 20% 80% ® 20%-40% 1 7:3 i161 075 1 3MI ]5 ; 5 w.vs Ina waa.., OT m Im.+a 1, aeve r»or��aoTh iK., uscs. �Ir EUEm�a �eECeuaa ry�^L uvUFeaS>ae4M1p Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 64 — Overpayment by Homeowners and Mixed Income Exempt Sites FA eN V u,ti, �' tram i'>� a4N•rnM � / n qzGrza 12aJ2024, 10 44.22 At 1 73,661 6 Mlxed Income Exempt Sites 40%- 60% o cis t s m� m Ovrp eayment ox by Homaners (ACS, 2017-2021)-Tract - 80% -80% 25 25 �, 20% a80% ® 20%- - o, �a um iva, a.raa n uo u.Vax�<< 40% EP4 XEa,E XE9E' Grote�nW9 u.OP+9 eSAa:: ,unlmubn, aw Im WSuea'wm: u Av Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 65— Overpayment by Renters and Affordable Exempt Sites 12/72024, 10:30:57 AM 1 73.661 • Affordable Exempt Sties 40%-60% a 075 15 3ml Overpayment by Renters(AOS, 2017-2021)-Trod-60%-80% 0 125 25 5km O �20% .80% rtL aw•. e.,.. Im s..e •e..�AG6. ®2O%_4O% Efrt XERE Guinn, GroTcnMepeg Inc., SGS. E➢A. Eu� XEAC GamYn. 4 CCen:welWp snlrSupn, .mc Ne WS uecmrmmuM Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 66 — Overpayment by Renters and Mixed Income Exempt Sites i. _ ... a h I .... ! e Wit. `"^'S' _ •:L141Kti0u n F 4 u LI�`' c•` /j wt. c �r 7-z ry 1217R024, 10,44:45 AM 1 73 G61 Mixed Income Exempt Sites - 40%- 60% o o>s t= s ml Overpayment by Renters(ACS, 2017-2021)- Tract -60%-S0% o 125 25 5Fn, 120% an% ®26%-4n% v Ea, HERE m L- a�mbs..—I 11. nn�..x..m. Ga�'n.n r—Tenial, 4e, UrGE. EM, Ea'n ieea wmn, s O ni—W.ac Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT3 Overcrowding A household is considered overcrowded if there is more than one person per room and severely overcrowded if there is more than 1.5 persons per room. HUD CHAS data based on the 2016- 2020 ACS and the HCD AFFH Data Viewer (2017-2021 ACS) are used to show overcrowding in Santa Ana and Orange County. Regional Trend As shown in Table 17, 2.7 percent of owner -occupied households and 9.5 percent of renter - occupied households in the county are overcrowded. Severe overcrowding is slightly less of an issue in the county. Approximately 1 percent of owner households and 6.1 percent of renter households are severely overcrowded. Table 17 Overcrowdingb Tenure Overcrowded (>1 person per room) Severely Overcrowded (>1.5 persons per room) Total Households Households Percent Households Percent Santa Ana Owner -Occupied 3,860 10.60% 2,085 5.70% 36,590 Renter -Occupied 8,640 20.00% 7,555 17.80% 42,550 Orange County Owner -Occupied 16,150 2.70% 6,520 1.10% 595,230 Renter -Occupied 42,145 9.50% 27,060 6.10% 444,775 Source: HUD CHAS Data (based on 2016-2020 ACS), 2023 Figure 67 shows concentrations of overcrowded households by tract regionally. Overcrowded households are most concentrated in the central county areas, including the cities of Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Westminster, Anaheim, and Stanton. Additionally, there are some dispersed tracts with high percentages of households experiencing overcrowding in Costa Mesa. Areas northeast, south, and west of Santa Ana have concentrations of overcrowded households below the State average. Local Trend As presented in Table 17, a larger share of households in Santa Ana are overcrowded compared to the countywide average. Nearly 17 percent of owner -occupied households and 38 percent of renter -occupied households in the city have more than one person per room, which is significantly higher than surrounding areas in the county. Moreover, 5.7 percent of owner households and 17.8 percent of renter households are severely overcrowded, with more than 1.5 persons per room. Figure 68 and Figure 69 show overcrowding by tract in the city. A majority of tracts have 20 or more percent of households experiencing overcrowding. The northeast part of the city has census tracts with slightly less overcrowding. Overall, there are six census tracts in the city with percentages of overcrowded households at or below 5 percent, these are located in the northeast and to the south in the South Coast Metro area. The South Coast Metro area, in particular, features more recently developed housing, including larger single-family homes, townhomes, and Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 upscale apartment complexes. These homes tend to be larger and designed to accommodate smaller household sizes, making overcrowding less likely. Overcrowding is a common concern voiced in community meetings and to Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services staff. Residents have expressed a form of overcrowding knows as "doubling up" —where a family co -resides with other family members or friends for economic reasons —as being prevalent and underreported due to fear stemming from legal status, language barriers, and retaliatory tactics from landlords. Community members have also expressed that due to the legal status of income earners, establishing credit worthiness is challenging and forces some residents to live with family members, creating or compounding overcrowded households. AB2011 Sites Inventory The majority of the City's units are in tracts with 12 percent to 15 percent overcrowded households or more than 20 percent. The location of the units does not exacerbate conditions and provides for units of all income levels in different areas of overcrowded household concentrations. The locations of the sites do not exacerbate existing conditions, as the projects do not include demolition of any existing units. Rather, the locations of the sites have the potential to improve existing conditions through providing additional housing at all income levels and creating options for families that may be doubling up or need larger units. Table 18 Distribution of Units IoV Overcrowded Households Affordable Mixed Income Total <= 8.2% (Statewide Average) 39% 41 % 41 % 8.3-12% 9% 8% 8% 12-15% 20% 17% 18% 15-20% 1 % 3% 2% >20% 31% 31% 31% Total 4,222 9,648 13,870 Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Similar to the Alternative sites, there is a high number of exempt sites located within areas that have a higher portion of households being overcrowded, but this is consistent with the makeup of the entire City. Conclusion Santa Ana has one of the highest rates of overcrowded households in Orange County and California. According to recent Census data, around 25 percent of all households in Santa Ana are considered overcrowded. To combat overcrowded households the City is working to expand its supply of affordable housing. With the Alternative sites the City hopes to promote a multitude of housing options in areas prime for redevelopment, especially near Focus Areas. This, along with other initiatives in the City such as tenant protection policies, the City hopes to start to providing more resources and housing options for all household sizes. Ordinance No. NS-3075 11/012023, 110408AM 0 Clty_Boundary ® 10% 15% Overcrowding (ACS, 2017 - 2021) -Tract - 15 % - 20 % = Less than 5 % More then 20% 5%-10% ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 67— County Overcrowding W - rr Ao�l� x. } 1:183,498 e 175 35 7mi e 275 55 11 km C / o, l N,geke. %,ea N Wm Nanagertant W. XEc Gamn, US , EG4 RCS, E.l, HERE G-1i C0r,St 'PAP ronmeaun mme e+:�Y,.�+n,�nM Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 68 — Overcrowding and Affordable Sites erJ•n;orov �genGNveia FfrvsE9( 'W3n. T as c j° � 4 Mlnal•r -� .Imlraa �—. 'Tnr a- uIN �atlar £ '� ea9 A♦ � va rr ev .Elln r J 12J312024, 4.06:14 PM • Approved Affordable Nlamatrve Sites 10%- 15% overcrowding(ACS, 2017 - 2021) - Tract 15%-20% Less than 5 % More than 20% ® 5%- 10% 163.325 c 05 1 7ml n axm orb n � rrori=+. e m IaI�I nr.nrin*am. BFL HERE GeoMnx'gas, Ire, 1156e, e.. srr M'AE re,min. m ap.nsmmYe snmeuba ir�OIIrt L'15uaer mnm1um1 Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT3 Figure 69 — Overcrowding and Mixed Income Sites aMl eb__ __ _ !P!wRI 4. ^ e. mi i.-r Weil ^ . n. : rr MA � 3;�jw y , .LQ-J13TN� F1 4^tn� t lZ72024, 10.10:53AM Approved Mixed Income Alternative Sites 10% 15% Overcrowding(ACS, 2017 - 2021) - Tract 15%-20% 0 less than 5% More than 20% ® 5%- 10% 1:73.661 0 n75 15 0 125 25 5krn ca.oly o1 �m wvaar. air.=� a yam •mnr Evr. METE Gnrmr, wo eomae;ea, uc USGs, EPA Evi, .ERE. Gamin, D GFenSVttIMaF wm•mw., ano me crs �v, .ov.rv�+v Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 70 — Overcrowding and Affordable Exempt Sites D �'—ir'— w ` 12/712024. 10:31:25 AM Affordable Exempt Silas 1(1%-15% Overcrowding (ACS, 2017 - 2021) - Tract - 15%-20% Lass than 5% More than 20% 0 5%-10% 1'73.661 0 f75 15 ml 0 25 25 5km E. EW, Wr HEREE CeRttmgapea. in NJGS, , IsEsni . R eCen4'ttNYp Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 71 — Overcrowding and Mixed Income Exempt Sites H v 1 1 c rl a. as 1217/2024, 10'45:24 AM E Mixed Incame Exemal Sites - 10% -15% Ovexrowding(ACS, 2017-2021)-beet _ 15%-20% lass than 5 % Max than 20% 0 5%-10% 173,661 0 0. 75 1.5 0 1is A km c iy a ill ae.a.. ea— a va Eri HERE Gamen. GeeTenv'oyn, in. u5[5. EG4 Fsr, KPE. GVMn, B qnn^.vaellAac mnu.wbf anclne G15 boo m.anurAy Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Substandard Housing Incomplete plumbing or kitchen facilities and housing stock age can be used to measure substandard housing conditions. Incomplete facilities and housing age are based on the HUD CHAS data (based on 2016-2020 ACS). Regional Trend Approximately 1.4 percent of households in the county lack complete plumbing or kitchen facilities. Incomplete facilities are more common among renter -occupied households. Only 0.4 percent of owner households lack complete plumbing or kitchen facilities compared to 2.7 percent of renters (Table 19). Table 19 Incomplete Facilities Lacking Complete Plumbing or Kitchen Facilities Total Households Households Percenf Santa Ana Owner -Occupied 140 0.40% 36,590 Renter -Occupied 585 1.40% 42,550 Total 725 1.00% 79,140 Orange County Owner -Occupied 2,150 0.40% 595,230 Renter -Occupied 11,890 2.70% 444,775 Total 14,040 1.40% 1,040,005 Source: HUD CHAS Data (based on 2016-2020 ACS). Housing age can also be used as an indicator for substandard housing and rehabilitation needs. In general, residential structures over 30 years of age require minor repairs and modernization improvements, while units over 50 years of age are likely to require major rehabilitation such as roofing, plumbing, and electrical system repairs. In the county, 85.6 percent of the housing stock was built prior to 2000, including 59.6 percent built prior to 1980. Local Trend Less than 1 percent of owner -occupied households in Santa Ana lacks complete plumbing or kitchen facilities (Table 19). A slightly larger proportion of renter -occupied units compared to the share of owner -occupied units lack complete facilities. Overall, the percentages of owner - occupied households that lack complete facilities in Santa Ana (0.4 percent) same as the county rate (0.4 percent), and Santa Ana's rate for renter units of 1.4 percent is less than the countywide rate of 2.7 percent. Nearly 80 percent of the city's housing stock was built prior to 1980 and approximately 94 percent was built prior to 2000. The biggest construction boom happening between 1960 and 1979 as the city was being built out (Table 20). Units produced during that construction boom make up 43.7 percent of the housing stock in the city. Units built prior to 1960 make up 35.2 percent of the housing stock. In general, the housing stock in Santa Ana is older than that of the county as a Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT whole, and the rate of construction in recent years has lagged that of the county. Housing that is 30 or more years old often requires some form of moderate or major rehabilitation. The Code Enforcement Division enforces ordinances pertaining to property maintenance, building conditions, and other housing and neighborhood issues. Evidence stemming from the quantity and types of code enforcement cases suggests that housing requiring rehabilitation is disproportionately concentrated in the central parts of the city, generally bounded by Seventeenth Street and Warner Avenue (north and south) and Grand Avenue to Harbor Boulevard (east and west). The census tracts with the highest percentage of poverty are in this area. The area also has high levels of overcrowded households, which exacerbates wear and tear and maintenance needs. Table 20 Santa Ana Housing Stock, Year Structure Built Year Built Santa Ana Orange County Number of Units Number of Units 2020 or later 304 1,559 2010 to 2019 1,994 63,440 2000to 2009 2,633 86,392 1980 to 1999 11,223 276,146 1960to 1979 33,519 445,644 1940to 1959 20,913 159,324 1939 or earlier 6,038 25,087 Total: 76,624 1,057,592 Source: 2021 American community Survey (ACS), 5-Year Estimates. AB2011 Sites Inventory Substandard housing and the age of housing stock are significant concerns in Santa Ana, contributing to housing challenges such as overcrowding and health issues. With such a high number of homes built before 1980, especially in the center of the City, it is important to provide new housing types at all affordability levels in areas that are ready for redevelopment. The City has been working to increase the supply of affordable housing, including new developments that meet modern safety and energy efficiency standards. While adding new housing is crucial, preserving existing affordable housing and ensuring that older buildings are properly maintained are also priorities. Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where the majority of buildings or homes were built before 1980. This of course brings financial challenges to households that are making their Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 current housing options work for them in the best way possible. Addressing these issues will require a combination of housing rehabilitation programs, code enforcement, and the creation of new, affordable housing options which can be done using the Alternative sites list. Along with the General Plan policies and other initiatives the City has in place, the City hopes to ensure that all residents have access to safe and healthy homes. Displacement Risk Displacement is a term often used to describe any involuntary household move caused by landlord action, market changes, or other disruptions. Factors contributing to displacement might include: 1) increasing overpayment and overcrowding due to housing costs; 2) significant investment or disinvestment in housing, transportation, jobs, or physical infrastructure; or 3) other local market- or demographic -related change. Many different definitions of household displacement have been offered. However, the Urban Displacement project has developed a hierarchy of communities at risk of displacement based on multiple criteria. The stages of vulnerability/gentrification/displacement are: • Low-income susceptible to displacement • Ongoing displacement of low income households • At risk of gentrification • Early/ongoing gentrification • Advanced gentrification • Stable/moderate/mixed income • At risk of becoming exclusive • Becoming exclusive • Stable/advanced exclusive Regional Trend Regionally, as shown in Figure 72, Santa Ana borders eastern Orange County, a more rural area fronting the Cleveland National Forest that is generally considered stable and at a level of advanced exclusivity. In addition, coastal cities to the southeast, including the cities of Irvine, Newport Beach, Mission Viejo, and others, are similarly exclusive, as reflected by their median incomes and very high housing prices. Vulnerable communities, which are characterized by higher levels of immigration, are most concentrated in the central county areas around the cities of Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Westminster, Anaheim, and Stanton. There are also smaller concentrations of vulnerable communities in Costa Mesa, Tustin, and Huntington Beach. Figure E-38 shows the risk of displacement in Santa Ana. Local Trend The Urban Displacement Project developed a neighborhood -change database to help stakeholders better understand where neighborhood transformations are occurring and to identify areas that are vulnerable to gentrification and displacement in Southern California. The database includes Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego Counties, with gentrification and sociodemographic indicators based on 2015 data from the American Community Survey. It shows whether a census tract gentrified between 1990 and 2000; gentrified between 2000 and 2015; Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT gentrified during both of these periods; or exhibited characteristics of a "disadvantaged" tract that did not gentrify between 1990 and 2015. Based on this neighborhood change database, the Urban Displacement Project team found that the number of gentrified census tracts Orange County the greatest share of neighborhoods that were considered "disadvantaged" and potentially susceptible to gentrification (-43 percent). Figure 73 shows the displacement levels for Santa Ana and the County. A majority of census tracts in the southern and northern parts of the city are categorized as low displacement risk meaning a Stable Moderate/Mixed Income or At Risk of Becoming Exclusive. Census tracts in and around the downtown, such as Willard, French Court, French Park, Lacy, and Pico -Lowell neighborhoods, are categorized as Low-Income/Susceptible to Displacement. In addition, the city's housing market is expected to experience change around the downtown, corridors, and specific plan areas. As the county seat, Santa Ana's downtown and other activity areas are intensifying, and this is expected to continue into the future as the general plan is implemented and the Focus Areas Public Realm plans are established. These efforts are anticipated to add significant new housing, including affordable housing, either through the application for density bonuses or through the City's Housing Opportunities Ordinance. So while land uses are being recycled for market rate housing, the City is also seeing the addition of new affordable housing. To combat displacement risk, the City of Santa Ana has a variety of programs in place to address housing preservation and security. • Housing Preservation. The City has approximately 40 deed -restricted affordable housing projects offering 3,200 units of affordable to lower income households with more in construction. • Housing Security. The City has 340 mobile home parks that offer almost 4,000 market rate units that are affordable to lower income households and are also rent stabilized. • Renter Protections. The City adopted its Just Cause Eviction in December 2021. The ordinance is consistent with California Civil Code Section 1946.2 and provides additional tenant protections to those provided under State law, pursuant to AB 1482. • Rent Stabilization. In December 2021, the City adopted a Rent Stabilization Ordinance, which prohibits rent increases that exceed 3 percent annually or 80 percent of the change in consumer price index, whichever is less, within the City. • Other Local Policies. The City also adopted a Local Resident Preference Ordinance in July 2024 for residents working and living in Santa Ana who are seeking affordable housing. AB2011 Sites Inventory The housing market in Santa Ana is anticipated to undergo significant changes, particularly in the downtown area, key corridors, and specific plan zones. The different planning initiatives are projected to introduce substantial new housing, including affordable options, facilitated by density bonuses or the City's Housing Opportunities Ordinance. The locations of the sites have the potential to improve existing conditions through increased investment and provision of new services that will not only benefit new residents but also improve the quality of life for all segments of the community, especially existing residents. The sites are also located in areas that have been designated for redevelopment through the City's General Plan and Focus Areas. Current Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 development trends show that high residential density is feasible and realistic, and appropriate to accommodate housing for all income levels and can be accommodated on the alternative parcel sites. By combining policy tools, direct support, and community -centered planning, Santa Ana aims to balance growth and investment with the need to protect long-term residents from being displaced. Exempt Sites The exempt sites designated by the City are primarily located along the west and east sides of 17th Street and Tustin Avenue to the east. These areas are generally outside of the City's Focus Areas and not targeted for redevelopment under the General Plan. Conclusion Both the Alternative and Exempt sites are in areas where there is a potential for displacement risk. Santa Ana is actively addressing displacement risk through a combination of policies, protections, and community -focused initiatives. The City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance ensures that new developments contribute to affordable housing, while density bonus programs incentivize developers to include affordable units in their projects. To protect renters, Santa Ana has enacted rent stabilization measures and just -cause eviction protections, limiting rapid rent increases and arbitrary evictions. The preservation of existing affordable housing is a priority, with efforts to rehabilitate older properties and prevent their conversion to market -rate housing. Additionally, the City collaborates with community land trusts to secure land for long-term affordability and provides financial assistance programs to help stabilize families at risk of displacement. Through inclusive planning efforts, such as the General Plan and Focus Areas Public Realm plans, Santa Ana aims to promote equitable development that benefits existing residents while ensuring that growth does not come at the expense of community stability. Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 72 — County Displacement Risk ^n �T 7- F- Y I I i �,.. .. , .. Gi 'ALL$ u 1 ver P & t Yui I - 7r' p^�ry im 9 a.aow spy' 2 sx urreau -oa Estimated Orsplacement Risk Overall Displacement (UCB, Urban Drsplacement PmlPct 2022) - Trod Low Data Quality Lower Displacement Risk At Risk of Displacement t Income Group (Very Low moon m Low Inane) is experiencing Elevated. High, or Extreme Displacement - 2Income Gmups (Very Law Income and Low Income) are experiencing Elevated. High. or Examine Displacement 1'97.325. 2 A Eud 325 55 m Carats ei Ln arrrarax. 6m,u al Lam xpnagemenr, GIs u,er snmur�ry aw Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 73 — Santa Ana Displacement Risk and Affordable Sites A°m4fl-r4�"s il3F'��r ��'G0.eAn91x:141'. *9iL9L•L . _ �—c- ' .Jnilrf .y1V 2 PM . _rib zo 16® C WUYrntama - . � i I ,1 r V -_- ,� 12/312024, 4:08:33 PM Approved Affordable Alternative Sites Estimated Displacement Risk -Overall Displacement (UCB, Urban Displacement Project 2022)-Tract 0 Lower Displacement Risk At Risk of Displacement i Income Group (Very Law Income or Low Income) is expenencerm Elevated, High, or Extreme Displacement 163,325 an 1 2ml �1 2 i km Eli" d tm mamma. Lwr�.r, of rnrrc rardyemam, Eah Hans, GImM. Geo.I"MPo� rrc. 1J5G5, EiW Es"Esn, NFfc ..I" fl Ornn9xwtlAop GnlrmuWs, +nellre GI]uwr ryrmarrrly Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 Figure 74 — Santa Ana Displacement Risk and Mixed Income Sites e � n P L J' - - eEmu� �[4'Sp LVTx� 12/7/2024. 10:1126 AM Approved Mixed Income Alternative Sites Estimated Displacement Risk - Overall Displacement DCB, Urban Displacement Project 2022) - Tract 0 Lower Displacement Risk ® At Risk of Displacement 1 Income Group (Very Low Income or Low Income) Is experiencing Elovalad, High, or Extreme Displacement '2IA�T) 1:73,661 a.15 1.6 �mi h 4 e fii 25 5km CMM' a Lm An %, l re- of laN hlana "11 Ext HEPE. G31m r, GeaLcnmlgas In[. USGS, EPA E R N E Ga_J' E O[en5lrceiMap xnluwlwc aw Irn Gi5 gym, m,n 1y Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 75 — Santa Ana Displacement Risk and Affordable Exempt Sites a � �1,�yTm�.- m�muwma40aa _ 91I .. R 4`w>t Aum 1T rt6+t.. fif; __ > LI r � - V.n• ,. +� � wrvewt - —� mxAuu ,rgwuu� vino CJ � _ �b 1 A ctniahm -`e _- vclk:� rcuu ?� B Ali ilexis ..err '� t - � �'" � tl' d✓. � ,. d'� x�, 12O12024, 10.31 49 Alvl 0 Affordable Exempt Saes Estimated Displacement Risk- Overall Displacement (UCB, Urban Displacement Protect 2022) -Tract Lower Displacement Risk At Risk o1 Displacement - 1 Income Group Nary Low Income or Low Income) m experiencing Elevated, High, or Extreme Displacement 1:73,001 0)s 3.1 125 25 skrn EPR, ask Xa, dN.ERE U.mml:¢es e. LK.Fs9, Ev: OOr.Mn. 6 pttt5:eelM1fau Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT Figure 76 — Santa Ana Displacement Risk and Mixed Income Exempt Sites I p_ Milk. oulp ,W I WOO C mad, 129,2024, 1045 46 Ml Affixed Income Exempt Sites Estimated Displacement Risk - Overall Displacement (UCB, Urban Displacement Project 2022) -Tract Lower Displacement Risk ® At Risk of Displacement — 1 Income Group (Very Law Income or Low Income) is experiencing Elevated. High, or Extreme Displacement 173,661 0 DIs ti Dml 0 10s 2" 5Fm cll'. o in. nr,ies, e.e.,, m wl uwcem.�i Ell XERE .-I GroinmdWm.. ... as Ell E., rails ell' I, ocesrKaice Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 1.9 Contributing Factors In the City's Housing Element, contributing factors were identified and prioritized based on disproportionate housing needs. These factors then influenced the City's Housing Plan and programs established in the Housing Element. Those programs are currently being implemented or have already been completed and are working to address the issues identified in the Housing Element AFFH and also in this analysis conducted for AB2011 and its alternative sites. Issue 1: Displacement Risk Santa Ana, much like the Southern California region as a whole, has experienced increasing land values and rental rates since the nadir of the Great Recession. This period in Santa Ana can be characterized by an influx of development in the city, particularly development that includes housing. While more housing opportunities are coming online, many residents have expressed that there is a lack of affordable housing options that threatens displacement or that may cause homelessness. As demonstrated by Figure 59, Figure 60, Figure 61, and Figure 62, considerable percentages of owners and renters in the city are overpaying for housing, and overpaying among renters is more acute. Moreover, as shown in Figure 73, some census tracts in Santa Ana are designated sensitive communities at risk of displacement. The Housing Plan provides programs for • Housing Stabilization. Implement the rent stabilization and just cause eviction ordinances to preserve affordable housing through regulating rent increases and establishing just cause eviction regulations (e.g., Program 33). • Housing Opportunity Ordinance. Require eligible rental and ownership housing projects to include affordable units (e.g., Program 25). • Housing Priority. Administer local preference for affordable housing created under the AHOCO or with City funding (e.g., Program 32) with a new Local Preference Ordinance adopted in July 2024. • Community Land Trusts and Collective Ownership. Partner with community -based organizations to support a community land trust program and pursue collective ownership models to promote ownership options and opportunities (e.g., programs 32 and 34). • Shelters and Support Services. Provide funding for creation and/or the provision of shelters, permanent supportive housing, and services for those experiencing homelessness or that are at risk of becoming homeless (e.g., programs 37, 38, and 39). Issues 2: Safe and Sanitary Housing Safe, sound, and healthy housing conditions are essential to fair housing opportunity for all Santa Ana residents. Due to the age of the housing stock in the city, much of it is in need of repair (Table 20). Many areas with lower median incomes are the same areas with older housing stock requiring rehabilitation. This means that renters may not have the housing mobility, due to lower income levels, to seek out housing units that are in better condition, and owners may lack the finances to regularly maintain and rehabilitate their homes. Additionally, those experiencing homelessness are most acutely affected by the lack of safe and sanitary housing. The Housing Plan provides programs for: Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT • Tenant Protections. Provide resources to residential tenants regarding landlord -tenant laws and responsibilities to ensure units are being maintained and up to code, and if not, tenants are aware of their rights and options for recourse (e.g., Program 44). • Code Enforcement. Enforce building and property maintenance standards and remove blight and unhealthy or dangerous housing conditions, and work with County Health Department to identify violations and streamline resolutions (e.g., programs 9 and 10). • Home Rehabilitation Grant Program. Provide grants to assist in the repair and rehabilitation of single- and multifamily homes as well as mobile homes for lower -income households (e.g., programs 1 and 2). • Emergency and Transitional Housing. Continue providing funding and services for providers of emergency shelters, permanent supportive housing, and support services for those at risk of becoming homeless (e.g., programs 37, 38, and 39). Issue 3: Housing Overcrowding Housing overcrowding refers to situations where a home has more than one person per habitable room. As shown in Table 17, nearly 19 percent of owner -occupied households and 42 percent of renter -occupied households in the city are considered overcrowded. In addition, during the workshops and community feedback opportunities, many residents described a form of residential overcrowding known as "doubling up" —where a family co -resides with family members or friends for economic reasons —as also being prevalent and undercounted in Santa Ana. As was discussed above and depicted in Figure 68 and Figure 69, a majority of census tracts in Santa Ana have greater than 20 percent of households experiencing overcrowding, and four tracts have overcrowding exceeding 60 percent. This issue is also correlated with Issue 2: Safe and Sanitary Housing, as overcrowding accelerates the wear and tear on housing. The Housing Plan provides programs for: Overcrowding Conditions. Facilitate development of accessory dwelling units and additions to existing homes to alleviate overcrowded housing conditions (e.g., Program 43). Diverse Housing Types. Facilitate diverse types, prices, and sizes of housing for the different needs in the community (e.g., Program 27). Affordable Component. Continue applying AHOCO to include affordable units as part of new housing developments (e.g., Program 25). Issue 4: Household Income Since the housing market is not a closed system, assessing income groups in Santa Ana in relation to neighboring cities and the county as a whole is a critical component for evaluating housing access and affordability. Santa Ana's median household income is significantly lower than that of the County overall. This issue is directly correlated with Issue 1: Displacement Risk, since lower -earning households in Santa Ana are vying for housing units in a highly competitive housing market and competing with higher -earning individuals looking to locate in a jobs -rich region. The Housing Plan provides programs for: Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT 3 • Affordable Housing Production. Provide financial assistance to support the production and/or rehabilitation of affordable housing for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income families (e.g., Program 21). • Rent Stabilization and Just Cause Eviction. Adopted a rent stabilization ordinance to preserve affordable housing through regulating rent increases and establishing just cause eviction regulations (e.g., Program 33). • Down Payment Assistance. Assist low-income households with down payment assistance loans to facilitate ownership opportunities (e.g., Program 34). • Supportive Services. Allocate funding to agencies that provide services to people experiencing homelessness or that are at risk of becoming homeless (e.g., programs 37, 38, and 39). Issue 5: Environmental Justice Areas An environmental justice community is an area of the city where residents have the highest risk of exposure to pollution in the air, water, and soil. Residents in these areas also tend to be burdened by socioeconomic and health issues, such as higher rates of language barriers, poverty, and asthma. Such areas also tend to experience lower rates of investment and improvements from individuals, private companies, and public agencies. All of these factors can lead to unequal opportunities to lead a healthy and prosperous life. There are 24 census tracts in the city that are considered disadvantaged or environmental justice (EJ) areas (Figure 46 and Figure 47). To address EJ issues, the City underwent an extensive multiyear engagement effort as part of its comprehensive General Plan update, with the last year focusing on engaging EJ communities and listening to their experiences and issues regarding environmental health and quality of life. The campaign consisted of a multilingual EJ Survey (electronic and hard copy) and 10 virtual and 1 in -person community forums, each focusing on a specific EJ area in the city. Feedback can be generally grouped into the following categories: improving air and water quality; improving public city facilities; improving infrastructure; providing healthy food options; providing safe and sanitary housing; increasing physical activity; and fostering civic engagement. The City has developed over 75 policies and over 70 programs that are informed by the feedback received from the community and that address pollution and population variables in the CalEnviroScreen model that are in the upper quartile rank in the identified EJ areas. With the completion of the General Plan, the City has begun the process of addressing the disproportionate environmental burden that residents in these communities have experienced. All of the efforts can be viewed on the City's NIES webpage: https://wv4w.santa-ana.org/departments/neighborhood- initiatives/ Issue 6: Education and Workforce Development As stated in Issue 4: Household Income, median incomes in Santa Ana lag behind the county. Moreover, as discussed above, more than half of Santa Ana households are in the low or moderate income categories (Table 15). This is despite Santa Ana residents being in closer proximity to jobs compared to the county as a whole and having more access to those jobs through transit connections (Figure 53 and Figure 54). This suggests that access to jobs is not an issue; rather, the issue lies in access to higher paying jobs. Higher paying jobs often require higher levels of job skills and educational attainment. However, nearly all of Santa Ana tracts scored in the lowest TCAC education quartile score. Additionally, a majority of the tracts in the city, with a Ordinance No. NS-3075 ATTACHMENT noticeable concentration in the central city area, scored in the lowest TCAC economic opportunity quartile score. To address educational and economic opportunity barriers that lead to housing and affordability issues, the City is included an Economic Prosperity Element in the updated General Plan. The element includes programs for workforce development, small business creation and retention, and incentives to hire local. In addition, the updated General Plan includes an element called the Community Element. The Community Element includes numerous policies and programs to directly address the education and jobs training issue. For example, there are policies and programs to support parent participation programs to increase high school and college graduation rates, expanding access to libraries and learning centers, promoting skill -based education programs, and investing in lifelong learning programs. Ordinance No. NS-3075 Uijt!tqbdf!gps!gjmjoh!tubnq!pomz P!!S!!B!!O!!H!!F!!!!!D!!P!!V!!O!!U!!Z!!!!!S!!F!!Q!!P!!S!!U!!F!!S P!S!B!O!H!F!!!D!P!V!O!U!Z!!!S!F!Q!P!S!U!F!S !TJODF!2:32! !TJODF!2:32! 711!X!TBOUB!BOB!CMWE!TUF!923-!TBOUB!BOB-!DB!:3812 711!X/!Tboub!Bob!Cmwe/-!Tvjuf!316-!Tboub!Bob-!Dbmjgpsojb!:3812.5653 Ufmfqipof)825*!654.3138)825*!654.31380!Gby)825*!653.7952)825*!653.7952 BCJHBJM!BMDBMB PS4992257 PS$;!!!!!!! DJUZ!PG!TBOUB!BOB0DJUZ!DMFSL 31!DJWJD!DFOUFS!QMB\[B!N.41 OPUJDFPGTFDPOESFBEJOHPG QSPQPTFEPSEJOBODF CZUIFDJUZDPVODJMPGUIF TBOUB!BOB-!DB!.!:3812 DJUZPGTBOUBBOB-DB/ UifDjuzpgTboubBobfodpvsbhftuif qvcmjdupqbsujdjqbufjouifefdjtjpo. nbljohqspdftt/Uifgpmmpxjohopujdf jtcfjohqspwjefetpuibuzpvdbobtl rvftujpot-nblfdpnnfout-boetubz jogpsnfebcpvudibohftjomboevtf- gfft-pspuifsqspkfdutuibunjhiucf QSPPG!PG!QVCMJDBUJPO jnqpsubouupzpv/Xffodpvsbhfzpvup dpoubduvtjgzpvibwfbozrvftujpot/ OPUJDFJTIFSFCZHJWFO.UifDjuz DpvodjmpguifDjuzpgTboubBobxjmm )3126/6!D/D/Q/* dpotjefsbepqujohbopsejobodf/Uifujumf pguifpsejobodfjtbtgpmmpxt; VODPEJGJFEPSEJOBODFOP/OT. Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb!!* 4186 Dpvouz!pg!Psbohf PSBOHF!!*!tt BOVODPEJGJFEPSEJOBODFPGUIF DJUZDPVODJMPGUIFDJUZPG TBOUBBOBBNFOEJOHUIFMJTUPG SFQMBDFNFOUQBSDFMTBOE Opujdf!Uzqf;!!!!!!!!!!! PSE!.!PSEJOBODF!QVCMJDBUJPO QBSDFMTFYFNQUGSPNDBMJGPSOJB HPWFSONFOUDPEFTFDUJPOT 76:23/225BOE76:23/235CBTFE VQPOXSJUUFOGJOEJOHTQVSTVBOU UPDBMJGPSOJBHPWFSONFOUDPEF Be!Eftdsjqujpo;!!!!! TFDUJPOT76:23/225)j*BOE 2tu!Sfbejoh!Tvnnbsz!Opujdf!.!OT.4186 76:23/235)j* NffujohUjnfboeEbuf;Uijtnbuufsxjmm cfifbsepouifDpotfouDbmfoebspo Uvftebz-Kbovbsz32-3136bu6;41q/n/ psuifsfbgufsjouifDjuzDpvodjmDibncfs- J!bn!b!djuj{fo!pg!uif!Vojufe!Tubuft!boe!b!sftjefou!pg!uif!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb<!J!bn 33DjwjdDfoufsQmb{b-TboubBob- Dbmjgpsojb:3812/Bmmjoufsftufeqfstpot pwfs!uif!bhf!pg!fjhiuffo!zfbst-!boe!opu!b!qbsuz!up!ps!joufsftufe!jo!uif!bcpwf J!bn!b!djuj{fo!pg!uif!Vojufe!Tubuft!boe!b!sftjefou!pg!uif!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb<!J!bn! dbosfgfsupuifgpmmpxjohmjolgpsnpsf foujumfe!nbuufs/!J!bn!uif!qsjodjqbm!dmfsl!pg!uif!qsjoufs!boe!qvcmjtifs!pg!uif jogpsnbujpoboejotusvdujpotgps pwfs!uif!bhf!pg!fjhiuffo!zfbst-!boe!opu!b!qbsuz!up!ps!joufsftufe!jo!uif!bcpwf! qbsujdjqbujohjouifnffujoh;xxx/tboub. PSBOHF!DPVOUZ!SFQPSUFS-!b!ofxtqbqfs!qvcmjtife!jo!uif!Fohmjti foujumfe!nbuufs/!!J!bn!uif!qsjodjqbm!dmfsl!pg!uif!qsjoufs!boe!qvcmjtifs!pg!uif! bob/psh0bhfoebt.boe.njovuft/ mbohvbhf!jo!uif!djuz!pg!TBOUB!BOB-!dpvouz!pg!PSBOHF-!boe!bekvehfe!b IpxUpNblfDpnnfout;Jgzpvbsf PSBOHF!DPVOUZ!SFQPSUFS-!b!ofxtqbqfs!qvcmjtife!jo!uif!Fohmjti vobcmfupqbsujdjqbufjouifnffujoh-zpv ofxtqbqfs!pg!hfofsbm!djsdvmbujpo!bt!efgjofe!cz!uif!mbxt!pg!uif!Tubuf!pg nbztfoexsjuufodpnnfoutczfnbjmup mbohvbhf!jo!uif!Djuz!pg!Tboub!Bob-!boe!bekvehfe!b!ofxtqbqfs!pg!hfofsbm! Dbmjgpsojb!cz!uif!Tvqfsjps!Dpvsu!pg!uif!Dpvouz!pg!PSBOHF-!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb- fDpnnfouAtboub.bob/psh)sfgfsfodfuif djsdvmbujpo!bt!efgjofe!cz!uif!mbxt!pg!uif!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb!cz!uif!Tvqfsjps! Bhfoeb$jouiftvckfdumjof*psnbjmup voefs!ebuf!1703102:33-!Dbtf!Op/!24532/!!Uibu!uif!opujdf-!pg!xijdi!uif KfoojgfsM/Ibmm-DjuzDmfsl-DjuzpgTboub Dpvsu!pg!uif!Dpvouz!pg!Psbohf-!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb-!voefs!ebuf!pg!Kvof!3-!2:33-! Bob-31DjwjdDfoufsQmb{bN41-Tboub boofyfe!jt!b!qsjoufe!dpqz-!ibt!cffo!qvcmjtife!jo!fbdi!sfhvmbs!boe!foujsf!jttvf Dbtf!Op/!24-532/!!Uibu!uif!opujdf-!pg!xijdi!uif!boofyfe!jt!b!qsjoufe!dpqz-!ibt! Bob-DB:3812/Bmmxsjuufo pg!tbje!ofxtqbqfs!boe!opu!jo!boz!tvqqmfnfou!uifsfpg!po!uif!gpmmpxjoh!ebuft- dpnnvojdbujpotsfdfjwfeuxpipvstqsjps cffo!qvcmjtife!jo!fbdi!sfhvmbs!boe!foujsf!jttvf!pg!tbje!ofxtqbqfs!boe!opu!jo! upuiftdifevmfetubsuujnfpouifebzpg up.xju; boz!tvqqmfnfou!uifsfpg!po!uif!gpmmpxjoh!ebuft-!up.xju; uifnffujohxjmmcfejtusjcvufeupuifDjuz DpvodjmboejnbhfejoupuifDjuz(t epdvnfoubsdijwftztufnxijdijt bwbjmbcmfgpsqvcmjdsfwjfx/ XipUpDpoubduGpsRvftujpot.Tipvme zpvibwfbozrvftujpot-qmfbtfdpoubdu uifDjuzDmfsl(tPggjdfbu825.758.7631 evsjohsfhvmbscvtjofttipvst/ 2303103135 XifsfUpHfuNpsfJogpsnbujpo;Bmmtubgg sfqpsutsfhbsejohbozjufnpouijtbhfoeb bsfbwbjmbcmfgpsqvcmjdjotqfdujpojouif DjuzDmfsl(tPggjdfevsjohsfhvmbscvtjoftt ipvstboeqptufepouifDjuz(txfctjufbu mfbtu83ipvstcfgpsfbDpvodjmnffujoh bu;xxx/tboub.bob/psh0bhfoebt.boe. njovuft/ PsejobodfTfdpoeSfbejohBepqujpo Fyfdvufe!po;!2102103115 Qspdftt.Psejobodftcfdpnffggfdujwf 2303103135 41ebztbgufstfdpoesfbejohczuifDjuz BuMpt!Bohfmft-!Dbmjgpsojb Dpvodjm/Nptupsejobodftbsfdpejgjfejoup uifTboubBobNvojdjqbmDpefboe cfdpnfdjuzmbxt/ J!dfsujgz!)ps!efdmbsf*!voefs!qfobmuz!pg!qfskvsz!uibu!uif!gpsfhpjoh!jt!usvf!boe! TjujfofqsfhvoubtfoFtqbòpm-gbwpsef dpssfdu/ mmbnbsbm)825*758.7631/ OvdomjëomdcohujohWju-yjo jouipjdipUjobMfft)825*758. 6325/ ``````````````````0T0````````````` `````` KfoojgfsM/Ibmm-DND DjuzDmfsl 23031035 PS.4992257$ !!!!!! Tjhobuvsf !A000006988761! Fnbjm Uijt!tqbdf!gps!gjmjoh!tubnq!pomz P!!S!!B!!O!!H!!F!!!!!D!!P!!V!!O!!U!!Z!!!!!S!!F!!Q!!P!!S!!U!!F!!S P!S!B!O!H!F!!!D!P!V!O!U!Z!!!S!F!Q!P!S!U!F!S !TJODF!2:32! !TJODF!2:32! 711!X!TBOUB!BOB!CMWE!TUF!923-!TBOUB!BOB-!DB!:3812 711!X/!Tboub!Bob!Cmwe/-!Tvjuf!316-!Tboub!Bob-!Dbmjgpsojb!:3812.5653 Ufmfqipof)825*!654.3138)825*!654.31380!Gby)825*!653.7952)825*!653.7952 BCJHBJM!BMDBMB PS49:1469 PS$;!!!!!!! DJUZ!PG!TBOUB!BOB0DJUZ!DMFSL 31!DJWJD!DFOUFS!QMB\[B!N.41 OPUJDFPGQVCMJDBUJPO KfoojgfsM/Ibmm-DND CZUIFDJUZDPVODJMPGUIF DjuzDmfsl DJUZPGTBOUBBOB-DB/EBUFE;Kbovbsz34-3136 TBOUB!BOB-!DB!.!:3812 BEPQUFEPSEJOBODFOP/OT.4186 2038036 TVNNBSZPS.49:1469$ OPUJDFJTIFSFCZHJWFO.po Uvftebz-Kbovbsz32-3136-uifDjuz DpvodjmpguifDjuzpgTboubBobevmz qbttfeboebepqufeboPsejobodf foujumfe; VODPEJGJFEPSEJOBODFOP/OT. QSPPG!PG!QVCMJDBUJPO 4186 BOVODPEJGJFEPSEJOBODFPGUIF DJUZDPVODJMPGUIFDJUZPG TBOUBBOBBNFOEJOHUIFMJTUPG )3126/6!D/D/Q/* SFQMBDFNFOUQBSDFMTBOE QBSDFMTFYFNQUGSPNDBMJGPSOJB HPWFSONFOUDPEFTFDUJPOT Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb!!* 76:23/225BOE76:23/235CBTFE Dpvouz!pg!Psbohf PSBOHF!!*!tt VQPOXSJUUFOGJOEJOHTQVSTVBOU UPDBMJGPSOJBHPWFSONFOUDPEF TFDUJPOT76:23/225)j*BOE 76:23/235)j* Opujdf!Uzqf;!!!!!!!!!!! PSE!.!PSEJOBODF!QVCMJDBUJPO Uijtvodpejgjfepsejobodfbnfoefeuif mjtupgsfqmbdfnfouqbsdfmtboeqbsdfmt fyfnqugspnBttfncmzCjmm3122)BC 3122*-lopxobtuifBggpsebcmfIpvtjoh boeIjhiSpbetBduboedpoubjofebu Be!Eftdsjqujpo;!!!!! HpwfsonfouDpefTfdujpot76:23/225 3oe!Sfbejoh!Tvnnbsz!Opujdf!.!OT.4186 boe76:23/235-xijdiqspwjeft tusfbnmjofe-njojtufsjbm-DFRBfyfnqu sfwjfxpgdfsubjoipvtjohqspkfdut/Uif mjtutxfsfsfwjtfeevfupdibohftsfdfoumz nbefupBC3122czBttfncmzCjmm3354- J!bn!b!djuj{fo!pg!uif!Vojufe!Tubuft!boe!b!sftjefou!pg!uif!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb<!J!bn xijdinpejgjfefmjhjcjmjuzdsjufsjbboe efwfmpqnfoutuboebsetjoTubufmbxopu pwfs!uif!bhf!pg!fjhiuffo!zfbst-!boe!opu!b!qbsuz!up!ps!joufsftufe!jo!uif!bcpwf J!bn!b!djuj{fo!pg!uif!Vojufe!Tubuft!boe!b!sftjefou!pg!uif!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb<!J!bn! qsfwjpvtmzdpotjefsfexifouifDjuz foujumfe!nbuufs/!J!bn!uif!qsjodjqbm!dmfsl!pg!uif!qsjoufs!boe!qvcmjtifs!pg!uif Dpvodjmbepqufeuifpsjhjobmpsejobodf pwfs!uif!bhf!pg!fjhiuffo!zfbst-!boe!opu!b!qbsuz!up!ps!joufsftufe!jo!uif!bcpwf! fyfnqujohdfsubjoqbsdfmtgspnBC3122/ PSBOHF!DPVOUZ!SFQPSUFS-!b!ofxtqbqfs!qvcmjtife!jo!uif!Fohmjti foujumfe!nbuufs/!!J!bn!uif!qsjodjqbm!dmfsl!pg!uif!qsjoufs!boe!qvcmjtifs!pg!uif! Jobqqspwjohuijtvodpejgjfepsejobodf- mbohvbhf!jo!uif!djuz!pg!TBOUB!BOB-!dpvouz!pg!PSBOHF-!boe!bekvehfe!b uifDjuzDpvodjmbepqufexsjuufogjoejoht- PSBOHF!DPVOUZ!SFQPSUFS-!b!ofxtqbqfs!qvcmjtife!jo!uif!Fohmjti btsfrvjsfeczHpwfsonfouDpeftfdujpot ofxtqbqfs!pg!hfofsbm!djsdvmbujpo!bt!efgjofe!cz!uif!mbxt!pg!uif!Tubuf!pg 76:23/225)j*boe76:23/235)j*/ mbohvbhf!jo!uif!Djuz!pg!Tboub!Bob-!boe!bekvehfe!b!ofxtqbqfs!pg!hfofsbm! Dbmjgpsojb!cz!uif!Tvqfsjps!Dpvsu!pg!uif!Dpvouz!pg!PSBOHF-!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb- J-KfoojgfsM/Ibmm-DjuzDmfslpguifDjuzpg djsdvmbujpo!bt!efgjofe!cz!uif!mbxt!pg!uif!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb!cz!uif!Tvqfsjps! TboubBob-epifsfczdfsujgzuibuuifDjuz voefs!ebuf!1703102:33-!Dbtf!Op/!24532/!!Uibu!uif!opujdf-!pg!xijdi!uif Dpvodjmjouspevdfeboedpoevdufegjstu Dpvsu!pg!uif!Dpvouz!pg!Psbohf-!Tubuf!pg!Dbmjgpsojb-!voefs!ebuf!pg!Kvof!3-!2:33-! sfbejohpguifpsejobodfpoEfdfncfs boofyfe!jt!b!qsjoufe!dpqz-!ibt!cffo!qvcmjtife!jo!fbdi!sfhvmbs!boe!foujsf!jttvf Dbtf!Op/!24-532/!!Uibu!uif!opujdf-!pg!xijdi!uif!boofyfe!jt!b!qsjoufe!dpqz-!ibt! 28-3135/UifDjuzDpvodjmbujutSfhvmbs pg!tbje!ofxtqbqfs!boe!opu!jo!boz!tvqqmfnfou!uifsfpg!po!uif!gpmmpxjoh!ebuft- NffujohpoKbovbsz32-3136-dpoevdufe cffo!qvcmjtife!jo!fbdi!sfhvmbs!boe!foujsf!jttvf!pg!tbje!ofxtqbqfs!boe!opu!jo! tfdpoesfbejoh-qbttfe-boebepqufe up.xju; boz!tvqqmfnfou!uifsfpg!po!uif!gpmmpxjoh!ebuft-!up.xju; PsejobodfOp/OT.4185-btmjtufebcpwf xjuiuifgpmmpxjohspmmdbmmupxju; BZFT;DPVODJMNFNCFSCBDFSSB- DPVODJMNFNCFSIFSOBOEF\[- DPVODJMNFNCFSMPQF\[- DPVODJMNFNCFSQFOBMP\[B- DPVODJMNFNCFSWB\[RVF\[-NBZPS QSPUFNQIBO-NBZPSBNF\[DVB 1203803136 OPFT;OPOF BCTUBJO;OPOF BCTFOU;OPOF Npujpodbssjfe-8.1/ Uifbcpwftvnnbszjtbcsjfgeftdsjqujpo pguiftvckfdunbuufsdpoubjofejouifufyu pgPsejobodfOp/OT.4186-xijdiibt cffoqsfqbsfeqvstvbouupHpwfsonfou DpefTfdujpo47:44)d*)2*/Uijttvnnbsz Fyfdvufe!po;!2102103115 epftopujodmvefpseftdsjcffwfsz 1203803136 qspwjtjpopguifpsejobodfboetipvmeopu BuMpt!Bohfmft-!Dbmjgpsojb cfsfmjfepobtbtvctujuvufgpsuifgvmmufyu pguifpsejobodf/ Uppcubjobdpqzpguifgvmmufyupguif J!dfsujgz!)ps!efdmbsf*!voefs!qfobmuz!pg!qfskvsz!uibu!uif!gpsfhpjoh!jt!usvf!boe! psejobodf-qmfbtfdpoubduuifDjuzDmfsl(t dpssfdu/ Pggjdf-)825*758.7631ps djuzdmfslAtboub.bob/psh-cfuxffo9;11 B/N/boe6;11Q/N/-Npoebzuispvhi UivstebzboebmufsobujohGsjebzt/Uifsf jtopdibshfgpsuifdpqz/ TjujfofqsfhvoubtfoFtqbòpm-gbwpsef mmbnbsbm)825*758.7631/ OvdomjëomdcohujohWju-yjojo uipjdipLsjtujfIbt)825*778.3317/ ``````````````````0T0````````````` `````` !!!!!! Tjhobuvsf !A000007012625! Fnbjm