HomeMy WebLinkAbout75-014RESOLUTION NO. 75-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDING A SCENIC CORRIDORS
ELEMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65302(h) requires a
Scenic Corridors Element of all City and County General
Plans in accordance with the Guidelines and mandates of the
State of California; and
WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Planning Commission, after
conducting the published public hearings required by the Santa
Ana Municipal Code, held two public hearings, one on November
26, 1974, and one on December 12, 1974, and by its Resolution
6063 has recommended to the City Council approval of the addi-
tion of the Scenic Corridors Element to the General Plan, which
is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
WHEREAS, the City Council gave due notice of a hearing
by publication as required by the Santa Ana Municipal Code;
and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was held at the time and
place so published;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts the recommendation of the
Santa Ana Planning Commission as contained in its Resolution
6063, and does adopt the addition of the Scenic Corridors
Element to the General Plan which is attached hereto as Ex-
hibit "A", and by this reference incorporate herein as though
fully set forth.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, in accordance with Section
27-17 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, said Scenic Corridors
Element is hereby adopted.
ATTEST:
MAYOR
RESOLUTION NO. 75-14
PAGE TWO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF SANTA ANA )
SS.:
I, FLORENCE I. MALONE, do hereby certify that I am the
Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana; that the fore-
going Resolution was introduced to said Council at its
regular meeting held on the 3rd day of
F, ebruary , 1975, and was at said meeting passed
and adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES,
NOES,
ABSENT,
COUNCILMEN'
COUNCILMEN'.
COUNCILMEN:
Yamamoto, Ward, Markel, Bricken,
Evans, Garthe, Griset
None
None
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
' i
SELECT SCEI',IIC CORRIDORS
PfilPAfl[N BY lNt PLANNING D[PAfllI~[NT o ClI¥ Of SANTA AflA CAlifORNIA
IIovErdB[R ~q74
D£C£MB~It ~974
SCENIC CORRIDORS
PROPOSED PLAN
pLANNING COMMISSION I{EARINGS
First Hearing - November 26, 1974
Second Hearing - December 12, 1974
Adopted by Planning Commission - December 12,
PREPARED BY
SANTA ANA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
OCTOBER 1974
1974
CITY OF SANTA ANA
CITY COUNCIL
Jerry M. Patterson, Mayor
Vernon S. Evans, Vice Mayor
James Ward
Lorin Griset
John Garthe
Harry Yamamoto
Ogden Markel
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Jack O'Dell, Chairman
Everett Winters, Vice Chairman
Harold Gosse, Jr.
Daniel Griset
Jean Ankrum
John Acosta
Sealy Yates
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSES
INTENT AND PURPOSE
USE OF THE PLAN
DEFINITION OF TE~MS
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF~PLAN
GOALS
OBJECTIVES
POLICIES
FEATURES OF THE PLAN
STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
DESIGN COMPONENTS
SPECIFIC PLANS
COST CONSIDERATION
PROGRAMS
APPENDIX
PAGE
1
1
1
2
3
5
5
5
7
9
16
19
26
27
29
A1
INTRODUCTION
An important objective of the General Plan for the City
of Santa Ana is to improve the appearance of physical develop-
ments in the City and the enactment of policies and regulations
that would encourage the highest standard of amenity in the
development of streets, buildings, open spaces and other private
and public linkages and facilities throughout the City.
Amendments to the California Government Code requiring that
a Scenic Highway Element be included in the General Plans of all
California cities and counties were approved by California
Legislature in 1972. Section 65302(h) of the California
Government Code states:
"The General Plan shall include a Scenic Highway Element
for the development and protection of Scenic Highways
pursuant to the provisions of Article 2.5 (commencing
with Section 260 of Chapter 2 of Division 1) of the
Streets and Highways Code."
Intent and Purpose
The emphasis of the Scenic Highway Element, as provided
by State of California guidelines, is the designation of
"Official State Scenic Highways" as enumerated in Section 260
of the California Streets and Highways Code. However, the
State guidelines state "...although the emphasis of the Scenic
Highway Element is on the designation of State highway routes
as 'scenic routes' with official state designation, this does
not preclude local agencies from developing and adopting local
scenic routes." Because of the lack of existing and potential
State "scenic highways," as discussed in the Background Report
accompanying this Plan, ~the identification and consideration of
local scenic amenities and corridors is the important emphasis
of the Scenic Corridor Plan. Several of the key features of the
Plan have been previously introduced via the adopted City of
Santa Ana 1967 General Plan through a variety of methods and
documentS; Circulation Element, Bicycle Plan, Urban Design
Element (1967 General Plan), Conservation Element, and Open
Space Element. Integral to the Scenic Corridor Plan from pre-
vious plans and programs are the City entryways, local streets
with unique scenic characteristics, landscaped and beautified
arterial streets and linear bicycle-pedestrian corridors. AS
such an integrating document, the Plan proposes new standards
and policies and reaffirms existing standards and ~olicies of the
adopted 196~ General Plan.
Use of the Plan
The Scenic Corridors Plan provides an o~ficial guide to
the City Planning Commission, the City Council, City Departments
other governmental agencies and interested citizens for the
identification, both existing and potential, and preservation
of scenic amenities within the City. The Plan includes de-
finitions, objectives, policies, standards and criteria, programs
and corresponding map which are to be used when decisions are
made pertaining to scenic amenities within the City of Santa Ana.
Definition of Terms
Local Scenic Corridor
A generally linear area traversing scenic or unique por-
tions of the City that has physical and/or visual features
which are aesthetically pleasing.
Riqht of Way
The generally linear, publicly owned strip of land, over
which an access or roadway is placed, leaving two strips of
land, adjacent and on both sides of the roadway.
Official State Hiqhway, official County Hiqhwa¥
Scenic highways officially designated by the Scenic Highways
Advisory Committee after application from local jurisdictions
and only if on list of eligible highways found in Section 263
of the Streets and Highways Code.
Streetscape
An area along or surrounding a roadway that is or has
potentials of being aesthetically pleasing. Aestheti
pleasing elements of a
grass, bodies of water,
formations, structures,
Street Furniture
streetscape are such as trees,
historic points of interest,
etc.
bushes,
geologic
Those articles, fixtures and accessories, used to equip
a roadway for the use of vehicular and pedestriam traffic.
Example: fountains, signs, benches, signal systems, light
posts, route identification fixtures.
Scenic Entry
Approach points into the City along designated scenic
corridors. All scenic entry points are on City limit lines.
Specific Plan
A plan dealing with a specific project providing informa-
tion concerning landscaping, precise alignment, relation of
project to surrounding land use, and cost. Plans proposed by
developers may be approved by City as specific plan.
Scenic Amenities
Visual and functional elements of a specific plan such
as landscaping, street furniture, setbacks, landscaped roadway,
medians, and decorat~v~walls, etc.
Off-Street Scenic Corridor
Scenic corrldor~generally following the direction of a
path, river, right of way, etc., not allowing motor vehicle
traffic.
Landscapinq
The Landscape is a composite impression of everything
seen, felt or sensed within an area. Landscape elements or
landscaping, includes all forms of planting and vegetation,
structures, walks, steps, wall, screens, street designs, and
street furniture. Landscaping does not indicate specifically
planting and vegetation.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE pLAN
Goals
· To insure the preservation of local scenic areas that
provide linkages throughout the City.
· To provide a local scenic corridor system which provides
identity, form and a framework to the City.
· To provide through scenic corridors, safe and easy
access to all areas of the City.
· To conserve and/or preserve amenities of local streets
with unique scenic characteristics.
Objectives
· To encourage private citizens and all levels of government
to assume a logical role in the regulation, funding, planning
and development of a scenic corridors system for the City.
· To develop programs and techniques to encourage private
land owners to provide an aesthetically pleasing urban scenic
corridor throughout the City.
· To identify scenic resources in the vicinity of streets
and highways. '
· To identify the need and methods of providing scenic
corridors in the CitY.
· To develop standards to provide and protect an aesthetic
environment along city, county and state streets
and highways and scenic areas such as rivers, creeks and
rights of way.
· To identify the relationshi}~ of scenic corridors to the
open space, circulation antt l,~¢t us~' policies of th~ City.
· To establish policies
guidance for future devoloi)m¢,nt (~t ,~ll sire. ets an~] highways
in the City.
· To develop standards to guide in determining those areas
and resources most valuable to c~tizen and community identity.
· To establish appropriate guidelines for walls, fences and
other barriers which create visual corridors throughout the
City.
6
POLICIES
· Where possible, City scenic corridors should connect to
surrounding municipalities scenic corridors to form a linked
system.
· The scenic corridor system should be linked, when possible
to parks, bicycle trails, historical sites, greenbelts and
other recreation-open space areas.
· The'City shall seek all available State and Federal
financing assistance to implement the Scenic Corridors Plan.
· Plans for scenic corridors shall be integrated with bicycle
trails plans and circulation plans for the City.
· Scenic corridors shall be designed to maximize the com-
patible multi-purpose objectives of open space and circulation
planning.
· A scenic corridors program shall make use of a full range
of methods for managing land uses compatible with scenic
enhancement in an urban environment.
· The improv'ement of all arterial streets within the City
shall consider the Provision of scenic amenities such as bicycle
paths, landscaped setbacks, and aesthetically pleasing fences,
walls and other ba=riers.
· The City shall continue to support and implement the City's
street tree planting program.
· Walls, fences and other barriers along arterial streets shall
be so designed to provide a pleasant and scenic affect to the
area.
· Scenic amenities should b~ specifically "tailored" to
the needs of the area and th~, scenic values to b(' preserved
through development of specific plans.
· Relocation or placing underground of utility lines as
required by existing ordinances shall continue in order to
improve the visual quality of the City.
· The Public Works Department shall be designated as the
appropriate City Agency responsible for consideration of design
criteria and standards for scenic amenities encompassing streets
and highways.
· The Parks and Recreation Department shall be designated
as the appropriate City Agency responsible for consideration of
design components for offstreet corridors within public right
of way and scenic amenities treatment within street right of way.
FEATURES OF THE PLAN
In the Santa Ana General Plan, the Scenic Corridors Plan
makes provision for scenic amenities and recommends steps to
create an identity for the City of Santa Ana both within its
municipal boundaries and from its abutting cities. The Plan
is based on linking a series of public and private facilities
producing a desired image. The Plan, therefore, focuses upon
particular areas such as~linear corridors, i.e., Santa Aha River,
railroad rights of way, etc., and scenic improvement of local
and arterial roadways throughout the City in setting forth the
comprehensive policy statements. The primary features of the
Plan consist of:
- Linkages to parks, open spaces and schools within the
City,
- Boulevard and parkway development along major arterials,
- Urban entrar~es and 'identity points within the City,
- The State freeway system,
- The major flood control channels, Santa Aha River and
Santiago Creek,
- Railroad and utility rights of way, and
- The Bicycle Plan for the City.
The Scenic Corridor
location recommendations,
design proposals presented and adopted in the 1967
Plan provides guidelines and generalized
and reaffirms several of the urban
Ge~ral Plan. Only through a specific plan on a project-by-
project basis will the specific features of this Plan be de-
picted.
Entrance Treatment and Identity Points
The Urban Design Element of the 1967 Genera] Plan identified
and recommended policies for [reatment of entrance points and
other important identity points throughout the City. As mentioned
in the 1967 General Plan, Santa Aha is remarkably uniform in
quality and visual appearance and undifferentiated from its
adjacent communities in Orange County. In order to create
awareness of entrance to the community and create an identity
for the City, several entrance points are recommended. Ail
the entrance points are generally located on or near the muni-
cipal boundary limits.
Northern
Fairview Street
Bristol Street
Santa Ana River
S.P.R.R. Right of Way
Flower Street
Santiago Creek
Grand Avenue
Main Street
Eastern
Seventeenth Street
Fourth Street
First Street
McFadden Avenue
Edinger Avenue
A.T. & S.F.R.R. Right of Way
Warner Avenue
MacArthur Boulevard
Southern
Grand Avenue
Flower Street
Bristol Street
Fairview Street
Harbor Boulevard
Santa Ana River
Western
Warner Avenue
Edinger Avenue
McFadden Avenu{,
First Street
Westminster Avenue
P.E.R.R. Right of Way
An important consideration in the entrance point concept
is that these entrances, while termed "points", may not be made
up of simply a single structure or landscaped Sign or portal.
These entrances, to be meaningful, should receive treatment to
a scale sufficient to create the desired impact upon entering
the community. The entrance "point" might constitute a con-
tinuous treatment along the roadway or within the roadway, a
diversion or change in the pattern of paving and structures of
roadway or an area at an intersection of the roadway with Strong
visual elements. Potential design components for entrance.
points are provided in a separate section of the Plan.
River,~ Creek, Flo~. Channels and Rights of,Way
Of primary importance to the development of scenic corridors
in the City are tho~e areas which allow for offstreet develop-
ment. Through the developmeT~t of several comple-
menting plans, i.e. Open Space, Co~servation, Circulation, and
Bike Route, the City has estab! [shed several offstreet corridors
which provide a backbone for a scenic corridors system. The
corridors as designated by this Plan are as follows:
- Santa Aha River - throughout th~, City
- Santiago Creek - throughout
- S.P.R.R. Right of Way - from Chapman Avenue south to
intersection with A.T. & S.F.R.R. right of way
- P.E.R.R. Right of Way - from Westminster Avenue south-
east to Raitt Street
- A.T.& S.F.R.R. Right of Way - from eastern City limits
northwest to northern City limits paralleling Lincoln Ave.
- O.C.F.C.D. Channel - Santa Ana Gardens Channel
- O.C.F.C.D. Channel - Flower Street Channel
- S.P.R.R. abandoned right-of-way from Chestnut Street
south to intersection with active S.P.R.R. line at
Orange Avenue; southwesterly to City limits.
- Southern California Edison easement paralleling
MacArthur Boulevard.
- O.C.F.C.D. Wintersburg Channel
Arterial Treatment
A select category of major arterial streets in the City's
General Plan included those streets which were tentatively de-
signated for boulevard and parkway treatment. On these streets,
a 120 foot right of way was indicated to allow for median land-
scaping and other visual treatments. In addition
to the above mentioned category, several major . ~
arterials in the City with proposed right of way over 100 f~et have
suggested improvements which consider some type of scenic ameni-
ties. Appendix A provides the Street and Highway Plan as adopted
in the 1967 General Plan (Workbook 4, Table 16 and pages 148
through 157). The Street and Hiqhway Plan, in addition to amend-
ments and additions, are incorpor,~ted herein as key features of
the Plan. There are a few se]ec~ ~rterial streets ~hroughout thE?
City which not only create a ci~'cu]ation system but also a dis-
tinct identity for the City and should have preferential considera-
tion for scenic amenities and improvement. The scenic amenities on
these major arterials may be a continuous landscape treatment,
median treatment, select landscaped points, etc. These major
arterial streets are as follows:
· Seventeenth Street
· First Street
· Warner Avenue
· Harbor Boulevard
· Bristol Street
· Flower Street
· MacArthur Boulevard
Because of t~ne complexity of right of way acquisition,
design and maintenance, it is difficult to provide specific plans
for select arterials within the City. At the time of improvement
of arterials within~%he City, scenic amenities such as land-
scaping, decorative walls, bicycle-pedestrian paths must be
considered.
One of the key features of the improvement of the visual
treatment along arterial streets is the design of fences, walls
and other barriers. The provision for improved design of block
walls, fences and barriers throughout the City, is considered
part of this Plan.
Local Streets
There are scenic amenities along several local streets w~thi
the City of Santa Ana that are worthy of retention. Through the
City street tree planting program, several streets are lined
with mature specimen trees, providing a pleasant and visual
component to surrounding land use. Local streets and the City
street tree planting program is a significant feature of the
Plan. Representative sections of local streets which have or are
proposed to have scenic amenities which are features of the Planar e:
· North Park Boulevard
· Cabrillo Park Drive
· Cypress Avenue - from Edinger Avenue to First Street
· Bush Street - from First Street to Santa Aha Freeway
· Maple Street/Rousselle Street - (P.E. right of way)
· Chestnut Street
have
State Freeways
The freeway system bisecting the City of Santa Ana does
the necessary elements to be designated an
no t
"official scenic highway;" however, they do provide a distinctive
visual impact for the City. The Newport, G~rden Grove and
Santa Ana Freeways must be considered as important corridors
within the City requiring scenic treatment. Landscaping should
be provided by the State along all freeway rights of way where
feasible. Future freeway alignments must consider the scenic
impact upon surrounding hand uses
treatment should be considered of
construction.
and significant landscaping
primary ~mportance in their
STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
General Standards
Standards and criteria contained in the Plan are to be
utilized as guides in the planning for scenic amenities
throughout the City. Each scenic corridor, arterial street
and local neighborhoods are unique in that different values
consistent with the area to be protected or beautified require
different controls. Therefore a separate study resulting in
tailored standards for each corridor, and/or arterial street
· is necessary.
Effective improvement of scenic amenities throughout the
City requires the evaluation and implementation of various
controls for individual projects. The final specific plan
must be evaluated in accordance to the Zoning Ordinance and
the consideration of the following land use controls:
· Architectural review
· Site plan review
· Adjoining land uses
· Building heights
· Building setbacks
· Residential density
· Building coverage
· Lot area
· Historical preservation
· On-premise signs , ~
· Outdoor advertising
Screening and landscaping
Specific Standards
Entrance Points
· An entrance point or entryway into the City may con-
stitute a continuous treatment along the street or entry point,
not merely a single sign.
· Entrance point should b~ identified with a specific
treatment to create an awareness of entrance to the City.
Arterial Streets
· Co~ercial, residential and other uses permitted along
arterial streets shall be approved after full evaluation of the
above listed controls for scenic amenities and review of the
proposed design for scenic quality.
· Emphasis for select arterial streets shall be to improve
the visual impact through increased buffering, landscaping,
effective architectural controls and reduction in signing.
· The improvement of new arterials shall include provision
for a landscaped setback between sidewalk and fences, walls or
other barriers. Five-foot setback for landscaping should be
considered minimum setback.
· Barriers along arterial streets should be composed of
landscaped~barriers 9r~combination of landscaping and walls.
River and Cr, eek
Open areas serving to provide visual relief
from surrounding development ~hould be maintained
in open space.
l?
· Orientation of signs within the immediate area of the
River-Santiago Creek Greenbelt corridor shall be strictly regu-
lated so as not to intrude on the corridor.
· Density and development shall be regulated by the above
mentioned control considerations.
· The riverbed and creekbed shall provide maximum amount of
scenic and recreational improvements, while providing flood
control protection.
· Landscaping within the river and creek area shall conform
to the Landscape Guide for the Santa Ana/Santiago Creek Green-
belt Corridor.
State Freeways
· Land uses requiring outdoor storage adjacent to freeways
shall provide adequate screening to limit visual impact.
· The State freeway system within the City shall be land-
scaped.
· Signs oriented toward the freeway system shall be limited
in square footage and height.
· Parking areas for land uses abutting the freeway system
shall be oriented away from the freeway.
· Future freeway alignments shall provide maximum amount of
landscaping and shall be below grade of surrounding land uses
where feasible.
Local Streets
· Local streets with unique
treatments shall be maintained.
scenic or visual
DESIGN COMPONENTS
The difficulty of roadway design is a search for
solution to meet the requirements of traffic service,
economics, local neighborhood benefit and aesthetics.
the ideal
safety,
In the design and construction of new roadways, scenic
amenities such as landscaped medians,.landscaped buffers,
setbacks for fences and walls and bicycle trails can be
considered. Existing roadways present difficulty, in that the
adjoining property has been developed and considering excess
right of way for scenic purposes is at times economically
unfeasible. Where possible, specific plans for the public
street improvement should consider a variety of treatments to
improve the scenic quality of the roadway. The design com-
ponents for select roadways will by necessity differ, because
of actual location and available right of way. The design com-
ponents provided in the Plan are to be used as guidelines for
development of specific plans for street improvements, fence and
walls along art'e~ials, scenic corridor design and entry points
design, and in no way are intended to be considered final standards
for all future improvements within the City.
urban entrance points to the City and Civic Center aould
receive a distinctively urban treatment such as changes in
paving, texture widening or narrowing of the roadway use of
brick, or other hard materials to create spatial enclosures
of a urban nature.
Landscaped information centers could be p~ovided at
various key locations throughout the City,
Improvemen~of several arterials and secondarys by
creating cul-de-sac of local street and providing landscaping
and street furniture wi~h unique "floorscape" to street.
Bike Lane
Bus Sto
Bike Lane-~~
· BUS STOP ·
11'
Well
dewalk
fer
· LOCAL and FEEDER Streets ·
Sidewalk
Perkwl~
~ S4' ~
Pirkwey
Bike Pith
8' · 24'
Parking
i
23
SPECIFIC PLANS
A specific plan must be developed on a project-by-project
basis. The specific plan as presented in this Plan corresponds
to the final plans presently prepared for each public project
and therefore should not require additional plans to be prepared.
Plans prepared by developers proposing a project may be approved
as a specific plan for such items as design of fences, walls or
other barriers along arterials.
The specific plan should be incorporated into other plans
for a designated project and should consider:
· Landscaping treatments for the project.
· The precise alignment of project or scenic corridor.
· Integration of scenic amenities with other as~pects
of land use.
· Consideration of two alternative cost and benefits
evaluation: one alternative identifying costs and
benefits that would normally be incurred without
developing the scenic amenities for the project; and,
a second alternative specifying cost and benefits
that would result from providing and/or protecting
scenic amenities.
· Sources of funding.
· Responsibility for implementing the specific
plan. ·
COST CONSIDERATION
The planning, construction and maintenance of scenic
amenities within street right of way and along off-street
corridors poses a complex question. There are two major
costs involved which must be considered. The first cost
factor is that of the construction and maintenance. The
second cost factor arises from acquisitions of additional
right of way and possible protective actions taken on behalf
of the City within a corridor. The following cost items when
put together, comprise the financial obligation which the City
must consider. Many of the cost items are scheduled through
complementing programs and will be expended regardless of
whether they are systematically coordinated in a comprehensive
manner to contribute to scenic amenities in the City, i.e.,
open space acquisition, bicycle trails construction, arterial
highway construction, etc.
· All projects Planning
Road Right of Way
Land acquisition
Roadway construction
Landscaping
Street furniture
Maintenance
O~f-Road Corridors
Ail projects
Land acquisition
Ancillary construction
Maintenance
Landscaping
Research and
Development
The question of the cost of projects has a broad range
and such cost requires examination on a project-by-project basis.
PROGP~%MS
These programs establish a framework for guiding develop-
ment of scenic amenities along, selected corridors in the City
of Santa Ana. In general, they indicate those actions which
should be taken in order to implement the goals, objectives,
and policies of the Plan. The described actions will require
a variety of implementation methods.
General - Studies and Plans
· Studies pertaining to the appropriate integration of
scenic corridors with future freeways and transit corridors
should be undertaken.
a The City should conduct an economic study incorporated into
studies and existing plans on a project-by-project basis for
public improvements which may include scenic amenities.
· The City should explore all potential sources for financing
the acquisition and development of scenic corridors and ancillary
features.
· The City should consider increasing the ultimate right
of way of selected streets to provide a scenic corridor system
throughout the City.
· The C~ty should_p~ovide, where financially feasible median
landscaping on arterial streets.
· The City shoul~continue to implement an active street
tree planting program.
· A study pertaining to the available methods of financi~1
the maintenance of' walls and [andscapinq alonq arterla! streets.
· Appropriate sections of the MuniciDa] Code shouId be
amended to privide protection for scenic corridors from
surrounding land uses.
· As specific plans are prepare(] by the City for future
development of streets, adequate consideration of [andscaQin~j
should be included.
· The City should encourage private develol:m]ent to urovide
a more scenic solution to barriers along arterial streets.
· Develop a priority listing of arterial streets which
should have a raised median and landscaping.
As programs are developed for the implementation of the
Plan, the programs should be included as special reports to
the Scenic Corridors Plan.
APPENDIX A
Selected excerpts from the Streets
and Highway Plan--1967 General Plan. For
specific right-of-way width for individual
street sections, reference Workbook 4,
Table 16 of the General Plan for the City
of Santa Ana.
Street
Memory Lane
Seventeenth
Civic Center Drive
Northwest Blvd.
Santa Ana Blvd.
Santa Ana Blvd.
Downtown Diagonals
Bolsa Avenue
First Street
Edinger Avenue
Warner Avenue
Segerstrom Ave.
(Dyer Rd. )
Alton Avenue
MacArthur Blvd.
Sunflower Avenue
Euclid Str~t
Harbor Blvd.
Fairview Street
Raitt Street
Suggested
Traffic
Section
4L+M
6L+M
4L
6L+M
6L+M
4L+M
6L+M
6L+M
6L+M
4L+M
4L+M
6L+M
6L+M
6L+M
4L+M
4L+M
6L+M
6L+M
4L+M
suggested
Total
R/W Wid.
100'
104'
104'
124'
104'
100'
120'
120'
100'
100'
100~
100'
104'
120'
120'
100'
120'
104'
100'
· A2
Bristol Street
Main Street
Northeast Blvd.
(Fruit Street)
Grand Avenue
Tustin Avenue
Red Hill Avenue
6L+M
6L+M
6L+M
4L+M
6L+M
6L+M
120'
104'
104'
100'
100'
104'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
Charles C. Zimmerman
William J. DaughertY
Edward P. James
~ohn H. Richards
Robert C. Sundstrom
Barry H. McPhee
Richard E. Steele
Miehael'H. Thiele
Steven M. Crawford
Patrick J. Kaine
Lester A. Smith
Charles L. Holland
· Yoshinori Kakihara
Laura V. Frazier
Janet L. Bullock
Alice A. Nishiie
Director of Planning
Senior Planner
Senior Planner
Associate Planner
Associate Planner
Assistant Planner
Assistant Planner
Assistant Planner
Land Use Investigator
Land Use Investigator
Land Use Investigator
Draftsman
Draftsman
Secretary
Steno Clerk
Steno Clerk
PARTICIPATING DEPARTMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Ronald Wolford
John E. Stevens
Joe Foust
Director
Assistant Director
Traffic Engineer
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Eugene R. Laumeister
Ben B. Koral
Ronald Y. '0~o
Recreation Superintendent
Park Superintendent
Landscape Technician