HomeMy WebLinkAbout76-103REL~ar
8/19/76
RESOLUTION NO. 76- 103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REVERSING THE
ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON
VARIANCE APPLICATION NO. 76-35,
APPROVING SAID VARIANCE APPLICATION,
AND APPROVING APPEAL NO. 366 FILED
THEREON BY PHYLLIS WHEELER
WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly held before
the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on August 16,
1976 on Appeal No. 366 filed by Phyllis Wheeler in opposition
to the Planning Commission's denial of Variance Application
No. 76-35;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based
on such public hearing and the oral and documentary evidence
submitted therein, the City Council of the City of Santa
Ana does hereby reverse the action of the Planning Commission
denying Variance Application No. 76-35, does hereby approve
said variance application subject to conditions as hereafter
set forth, and does hereby approve Appeal No. 366.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council
hereby adopts as its findings of fact for approval of Variance
Application No. 76-35 those "Finding of Fact, Variance Applica-
tion No. 76-35" prepared and submitted by the Planning Commis-
sion attached hereto, and that said variance application is
approved on condition of compliance with all requirements set
forth therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said variance appli-
cation is approved on the additional condition that this var-
iance shall be submitted for review by this Council at the
expiration of twelve months hereafter, at which time this Coun-
cil may supplement or modify the conditions of approval or
initiate revocation proceedings for noncompliance with such
conditions.
ADOPTED this 24th day of August ,
1976, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Brandt, Ward, Bricken, Yamamoto
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN:
ATTEST:
~ORENCEI. MALON~
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~W./%~KEITH L. GOW
CITY ATTORNEY
Ortiz, Garthe
Evan~
FINDING OF FACT
VARIANCE APPLICATION NO. 76-35
REPORT DATE
Staff: 6/22/76
Conelsslon: 6/28/76
APPLICANT: Lovell L. and P. Diane Tasch
ADDRESS & ZONING: 802 North French
AP 6-045-08
R 3H HD II District
SDM 7-5-g
VA PURPOSE: To convert an existing house into an office in the
R 3H HD II District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial
COMMISSION ACTION & VOTE: June 28, 1976 Denied
AYES;
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Yates, Acosta, Gosse, Anrkum, O'Dell, Griset
Commissioners None
Commissioner Winters
REASON FOR ACTION:
A. The General Plan indicates high density residential and this would be a
further intrusion into the residential area with an office use.
B. There is a great amount of land in the City that is zoned for
office use that is presently undeveloped.
DETAILS OF PROPOSAL:
1. Descrtpti'on of Proposal:
The applicant proposes to convert an .existing residence to an office use
as follows:
office space: 945 sq.ft.
reception and lobby: 7§7 sq.ft.
secretarial: 196 sq.ft.
kitchen: 168 sq.ft. ·
numerous storage closets
parking provided: l0 standard offstreet parking stalls and 1 compact
car space; parking required, 9 offstreet parking spaces
Area Description:
A. Property: Subject property has 80 feet of frontage on French Street
and 125 feet of frontage on Eighth Street and contains approximately
10,000 sq.ft.
B. Surrounding Development:
Ce
North: single family residence
East: apartments, office building and single family residence
South: single family residence
West: apartments and single family residence
Street System: French and Eighth Streets are both local streets.
O. Comparable Applications or Circumstances:
VA lOO1 in 1958 permitted the property at 801 North French to be used
as an office.
VA 76-35 Lovell L. and P. Diane Tasch
E. Surrounding Zoning: See attached SDM.
F. Present Use: single family residence
General Plan Compatibility:
The General Plan indicates High Density Residential for the area under
consideration.
4. Reasons for Staff Reconeendation:
A. The General Plan indicates High Density Residential and this would
be a further intrusion into the residential area with an office use.
B, There is a great amount of land in the City that is zoned for office
use that is presently undeveloped.
If the Con~ission approves' the application, the following:standard require-
ments must be met:
A, Planning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14
B. Public Works: l, 5, 10, 16, 2lc, d, 22c, 27, 28, 43
6. The following requirements must also be met:
A. Planning
1)
2)
A 6-foot high, 6-inch wide decorative block wall be constructed
along the north and west property lines. Said wall shall not
exceed 4 feet in height within 20 feet of any street right of way.
Exterior of the bui!ding~shall be painted in a manner meeting the
approval of the Planning Department, if needed.
3)
Any signs on the office building shall meet with the requirements
of the p {Professional) zone in the sign ordinance.
Any modification to 5utldtng exterior design must maintain a resi-
dential appearance and must meet with the approval of the Planning
Department.
B. Public Works
Dedications: Street easement for a 15-foot radius Spandrel at the
northwest corner of French and Eighth Streets.
2) Improvements.:
a)
French Street: Replace any poor sidewalk as required by the
Department of Public Works and place sidewalk in the spandrel
area at the]northwest corner of French and Eighth Streets..
NOTE: Minimum width drive approach is l0 feet in the flat.
b) Replace curb return and sidewalk at the northwest corner of
French and Eighth Streets to include a wheel chair ramp.
NOTE: Curb returh radius to be determined at a later date.
c) Eighth Street: Replace any poor sidwalk as required by the
Department of Public Works.
NOTE: Developer responsible if any relocation of "guy pole" re-
quired for drive approach.
d)
Developer must remove street trees adjacent to the proposed
drive approaches after written approval is obtained from the
Parks Department.
VA 76-qR pa~a? ~ I
VA 76-35 Lovell L, and P. Diane Tasch
Ce
;ire Department :
l) Provisions of the following codes shall apply:
Uniform Fire Coda. ~g71
National Fire Protection Assn. Standards l0 and 96
2)
Floor plans incorporating the above codes shall be submitted
to the Fire Department showing locations of portable fire ex-
'ttnguishers with 2A rated all-purpose extinguishers on each
floor and automatic dry chemical fire extinguishers in the
hoods and ducting over cooking areas.
Police Department
1). A silent alarm system for burglary be installed.
2) All exterior doors be solid core in design.
3) Doors which have glass within 40 inches of the locking device
· shall be equipped with a double cylinder deadbolt lock with a
minimum one inch throw.
4)
All exterior doors with glass 40 inches or more from the locking
device may be equipped with a single or double cylinder deadbolt
lock with a minimum one inch throw.
s)
Doors with exterior exposed hinge devices shall be equipped with
devices to prevent the door from being removed by by-passing
these hinges, subject to the approval of the Police Department.
6) All windows shall be secured with an auxiliary locking device and
must meet with the approval of the Police Departm, ent.
.7)
8)
Exterior doors have lighting devices sufficient to illuminate the
door and doorway and that such lighting be equipped with 60 watt
incandescent light bulb. ~
The building be clearly 'identifted by street number address.
These identifying numbers shall be 4-inch numbers mounted against
a contrasting color and shall be visible from traveled access areas.
COMPLIANCE WITH C.E.Q.A. PROCEDURES: Negative Declaration
Harold Gosse, Jr., Vice-Chairman
Santa Ana Planning Commission
........ II ................. J L .....
C4 ti
/
FIRST
ZONING D'ISTRIC T
, J,i '~'' '1/' II fOl li'I/,.~ !l, jr,~ il ' ii' !';I Il I!?~ '1t' ~'!!)/,~ Il')