HomeMy WebLinkAbout77-022RESOLUTION NO. 77-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
CONCURRING IN THE ADDENDUM TO THE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGE-
MENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the Nejedly-Z'berg Dills Solid Waste Management and Resource
Recovery Act of 1972 (hereafter referred to as the Act) requires each county
in cooperation with affected local jurisdictions, to prepare a comprehensive,
coordinated solid waste management plan; and
WHEREAS, said Act also requires that such plan shall
with state policy and any appropriate regional or sub-regional
management plan; and
be consistent
solid waste
WHEREAS, said Act also requires that the county solid waste manage-
ment plan shall be subject to the approval by a majority of the cities within
the county which contain a majority of the population of the incorporated areas
of the county; and
WHEREAS, the County of Orange has prepared an addendum to the plan
for solid waste management in conformance with the act and on February 22, 1977
submitted said addendum to the plan to this Council for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA: that the City Council of the City of Santa Ana has reviewed said
addendum to the plan and hereby specifically stipulates concurrence in the
following: (a) the objectives set forth in the addendum to the plan, (b) the
method and organization for implementation of the programs contained in the
addendum to the plan, (c) the procedures for financing the recommended solid
waste management program and (d) the role identified in the addendum to the
plan for the City in implementing this cooperative effort for management of
solid waste in an economical and environmentally acceptable manner.
ADOPTED this 22nd ~ay of
following vote:
February
, 1977, by the
ATTEST:
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Ward, Yamamoto, Bricken, Ortiz,
Garthe, Evans, Brandt
NOES, COUNCILMEN:
None
ABSENT, COUNCILMEN:
None
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KEITH L. GOW, City Attorney
Addendum to the Orange County Solid Waste Management Plan
The following dhanges are proposed in the final plan.
1. Page 28
2. Page 38
3. Page 39
4. Page 41
5. Page 56
6. Page 67
7. Page 77
8. Page 85
9. Page 88
Change table - Dry Volume in Tons Per Year as follows:
1978 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Pesticide Containers ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Comment: The original projection has been revised.
The last sentence of Section 3. Landfills is revised to
read as follows: "Table 3-1 and'3-5 present additional
data on existing landfills."
Item b, second paragraph - Delete "acquisition of this
site will be started at some later date," add "It is
anticipated that funding for this acquisition will be
spread over the five year period starting in fiscal
year 1978-79 and ending in the fiscal year 1982-83."
After Transfer Stations, General, add new paragraph -
"Additional data on transfer station operations are
presented in Table 3-6."
Section V,A,1 - change "should" to "shall"
Section V,A,2 - change sentence to read as follows:
"Every Jurisdiction will conduct necessary enforcement
activities to rehabilitate existing inadequate storage
locations."
Comment: These statements are modified to clarify
co----~--~ent to enforce State minimum standards.
Change "Sanitation" Engineering to "Sanitary" Engineering.
Section II,I, second paragraph - change "Class" I to
"Group" I.
End of Section VII,A,2 - add the sentence "Negotiations
for the initial program are planned for 1978 and aimed
toward gas extraction by 1980."
Comment: This is a firmer commitment to investigate
land-~-~l gas recovery and assumes substantial progress
will be made on research programs now in progress in
neighboring counties.
Modify the first sentence, second paragraph, after the
word underway - add "and scheduled for completion in 1977."
Comment: This statement is in regard to a study in prog-
ress concerning pit rehabilitation by filling with inert
waste, i.e., soil, rock, concrete, etc.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Table 3-3 has been upda.ted.
Table 3-4 has been revised to show only resource increases since
1972.
Table 3-5 has been added.
Table 3-6 has been added.
Comment: These tables were requested by the State. They present
a l~ng of operating hours, manpower, and equipment at the
Transfer and Disposal stations.
Tables 6-3 and 6-4 have been revised.
Comment: These tables were revised to reflect a reduced rate of
· sp~l at Coyote Canyon as determined by recent photogrammetric
surveys.
Tables 9-1, 9-2, and 9-3 have been revised.
Comment: The State requested revision of these tables to reflect
anticipated costs and sources of revenues for enforcement of
AB 2439 which becomes law on January 1, 1977.
A supplement to Table 10-1, Implementation Schedule, has been
added.
Comment: This addition was required by the State. Ail items
ave~--~en discussed in the preceding comments except planning
for hazardous waste spills. This planning effort will be com-
pleted for approval in 1977.
-2-