HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-155EJC:sc
8/29/79
RESOLUTION NO. 79-155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED FIRST AMENDMENT
TO PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA AND STEVEN J. KEISER AND
PAULA B. KEISER FOR THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT
OF THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE SANTA
ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Santa Ana has prepared an Initial Study of the environ-
mental impact of the proposed First Amendment to Participation
Agreement between the Agency and Steven J. Keiser and Paula B.
Keiser; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana
has reviewed and considered the above said Initial Study and
the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana Rede-
velopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has found on the basis of the
Initial Study that the environmental impact of the proposed
First Amendment to Participation Agreement is essentially the
same as in the previous Environmental Impact Reports; and that
there is no additional information or data available requiring
supplementation of the previous Environmental Impact Reports;
and
WHEREAS, said Initial Study conforms to the require-
ments of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
(Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.), the "Guide-
lines for the Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970," as amended, adopted by the Secretary for
Resources of the State of California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970 adopted by resolution of the Agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
1. Neither the approval nor the implementation of
the proposed Agreement will cause substantial changes in the
Redevelopment Project, or with respect to the circumstances
under which the Project is to be undertaken, which will require
major revisions in the Environmental Impact Reports previously
adopted for the Project due to the involvement of new environ-
mental impacts not covered in said previous Environmental
Impact Reports.
2. No new information of substantial importance to
the project has become available which shows that the project
will have one or more significant effects not discussed pre-
viously in the Environmental Impact Report; or that signifi-
cant effects previously examined will be more severe than
shown in the Environmental Impact Report; or that mitigation
measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible
would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one
or more significant effects of the project; or that mitigation
measures or alternatives which were not previously considered
in the Environmental Impact Report would substantially lessen
one or more significant effects on the environment.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-155
PAGE TWO
3. The proposed action will have no significant
effect on the environment, except as identified and considered
in the previous Environmental Impact Reports.
ADOPTED this 17th day of
1979, by the following vote:
SeDtember
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEN: Bricken, Griset, Luxembourger, Serrato,
Ward, Yamamoto
COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Markel
ATTE ST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KEITH L. GOW
CITY ATTORNEY