Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-02-1960/438 ~Ctty Council met in regular session. i Meeting called to order by the Mayor. Present: 7:30 P.M. Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., 'Dale Hi Hefnly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Absent: Councilmen None The Pledge of Allegiance '~s giveu. Invocation was given by Reverend Garland Lacey, Wilshire United Presbyterian Church. Each member of the City Council h~ving received copies of the Minutes of April 18, 1960, reading of the Minutes was dispensed with and approved on motion of Council- i man Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried. Council Chamber Santa Aha City Hall Nay 2, 1960 A tabulation of bids ~e~s presented for the furnishing and delivering of (1) 622 Street Name Faces 6" x 2~"; (P) 30 Street Name Faces 6" × 30"~ (3) 672 Aluminum Blanks 6" x 2~" x .063"; (h) 30 Alt~inum Blanks, 6" x 30" x .063"; (5) 652 Street Name Sign Block Number Faces ~½" x 8"; and (6) 376 Aluminum Blanks ~½" x 8" x .063" i Bid acceptance Street Name Sign Faces, Block Numbers and Alumi- num Blanks Specification No. 641-1, as follows: Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item h Item 5 Item6 ~nesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. $ 870.80 42.00 No Bid No Bid 163.O0 No Bid Zumar Industries, Inc. 1,041.~8 58.03 622.00 32.1h ~5~.31 lh8.60 On m~tion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the lowest and best b~d of Minnesota Mini~g and Manufacturing Compsny was accepted for item 1, total amount of ~870.80; item 2, total amouut of $h2.00 and item 5, total amount ofi $163.00; and the bid of Ztn~ar Industries~ Inc. was accepted for item 3, total amount Bid acceptance Traffic Control Devices and ~F~ipment of $622.00; item h~ total amount of $32.1~, and item 6, totn.] amot~nt of $1~8.60. A tabulation of bids was presented for the Furnishing of Trsffic Control Devices aud Equipment,Specification No. 6~3-3, as foll~s: Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item ~ Item 5 Item 6 Item 7 Econo~ite Corporation Bid Liability Insurance Santa Aha On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the bid of Econo- lite Corporation was accepted for item~ i through 7, in the total amount of ~6, h8h.lO'~ On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by M~inly and carried, action was postpone~ to May 16, 1960, on the award of the bid for Public Liability Insurance for the City of Santa An~, for a three-year period starting July 1, !960, ~pec~fication No. Bid acceptance Sanitary Sewer Sugar Avenue Project 24 522-1. A tabulation of bids was presented for the construction of Sanitary Se~er on Sugar Avenue between Newhope Street and a point approximately 11OO feet east of Harbor Boulevard, Project No. 24~ as follow, s: Total Bar-Boc Contractors, Inc. $ 43,082.20 Barkley Pip*line Construction, Inc. ~7,682.O0 Orange County Construction CO. 60,335.00 Leo Weiler Company 66,240~00 Bond On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbsrd and carried, the lowest and best bid of Bar-Roc Contractors: Inc. was accepteS~ in the total amount of $43,082.20, Bid acceptance Power Stump Cutter and all other bids rejected. A tabulation of b~ds was presented for the Furnishing of One pOWer Stump Chatter, Specification No. 652-7, as follOWs: B. Hayman Company, Inc. Mobile Towers & Cranes Co. Total Roo.oo 3,738.0o On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Brewer and carried, the best bid of B.Hayman Ccerpany, Inc. was accepted, in the total amount of $3,900.00, and the other bid rejected. 409 Hearing This being the date set for hearing on annexation of property consisting of approxi:- "Mam(~my,Lane and Baker North No. 2 Annex" m~tely four acres located approximately 700 feet east of Bristol Street and north Ordinance d~?~ of Memory Lane, designated "Memory Lane and Baker N~rth No. 2 Annex!'..' no protests were received and the hearing was declared closed. On motion of Councilman seconded by Nubbard and carried, the following Ordinance entitled: "Ordinance declaring the annexation of that certain territory designated 'Nemory L~ne and Baker North No. 2 Annex'" Hearing Reso.No.60-83 Abatement of Weeds was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading. This being the date set for hearing protests on the abatement of weeds; no protest were received, and the hearing was closed. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motio~ of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the following Resolution entitled: "Resolution No. 60-83 ordering the Street Superintendent to abate the public nuisance heretofore declared by the City Council of the City of Santa kna, to-wit: Weeds which bear seeds of a wingy or downy nature and attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace when dry and which are noxious and dangerous, growing upon certain streets, sidewalks and private property in the City of Santa Ana, by having the weeds referred to removed" considered and passed by the following vote: Variance Applications (granted) Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.~ Bob Brewer, A,A.Hall Noes, Councilmen Dale H. Heinly Absent, Councilmen None On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the recommendations of the Planning Commission were approved, and the following Variance Applications grantedt No. Mary pCmeroy Variance Application No. 1294, filed by Mary Pomeroy, to erect a two-story, four-unit apartment house, ~Jith an attached three-car garage, on property at !415 No. Ross Street, in the R-2 District, subject to conditions and in accordance with revised plot plan, showing three fruits instead of four, No. 1296 Dale E. Fowler Variance Application No. 1296, filed by Dale E. Fowler, to erect a two-story, eiEht-unlt apartment building, on property at 1417 No. Ross Street, in the District, subject to conditions and in accordance w~th revised plot plan, No. 1304 CunninghamBuilders, Inc. No. 1305 Fairlane Homes, Inc. Variance Application No. 1304, filed by the Cunningham Builders, Inc., to build a one-story, eight-unit apartment house, on property at Standard ~venue (Lot 20, Tract 2482) approximately 800 Block, on east side of street, between Wake~ ham Avenue and Wisteria Place, in the R-1 District, subject to conditions, Variance Application No. lB05, filed by Fairlane Homes, Inc., to decrease fro~- yard requirements from 60 feet to 50 feet and construct au 18-inch eave into the four-foot side-yard requirements, on property on the south side of Sugar Avenue, between Newhope Street and Harbor Boulevard (Lots I - 93, Tract 3656) in the R-1 District, in accordance with plot plan, No. 1307 Sage Mortgage Co.,Inc. Variance Application No. 1307, filed by Sage Mortgage Company, Inc., to con- struct a duple~ contaSning two two-bedroc~ single-family dwellings, of 832 square feet each, plus 2a-foot by 20-foot attached garage, on property located at the first lot east of 611 Adams Street, in the R-1 District, in accordance with plot plan~ and 13o8 Sidney O. Holland Variance Appl.No.1291 Alfred Carney Variance Application No. 1308, filed by Sidney 0. Holland, to build one addi- i tioual single-family residence on a lot with three existing dwellings, on property at B10 No. Gunther Place, in the R-2 District, subject to conditions. On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Heinly and carried, at the request of th~ applicant action was postponed until the next meeting on Variance Application No. 1291~ filed by Alfred Carney and David E. Asher, to convert the front apartment to an office for The Burton Detective Agency, on property at 713 Spurgeon Street, in Variance Applications (denied) the R-3 District. On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the recommendations of the Planning Commission were approved, and the following Variance Applications denied: No. 1306 Clay A. White Variance Application No. 1306, filed by Clay A. White, to establish a home for elderly persons, on property at 206 Wright Street, in the R-2 District, and the petition signed by nineteen persons pretesting the Variance, ~s received and filed~ 440 I]No. 1281 ~ Variance Application No. 1281, filed by George ~J. Gellatly, to construct an II ~-~ George W. Gellatly additional single-family dwelling on a lot with one existing single-family dwellin~ ~ on property at 1908 Orange Avenue, in the R-1 District. Variance Appl.No.lSOB Conm~tuicatiou was presented from the Planning Cc~mission reconn~endiug denial of Wm.Howard Wilson C~J~ Vsriance Application No. 1~0~, filed by Wm. Howard Wilson, to build a new house on the front helf of the lot, with special construction such as three front ramp, etc., for a wheel-chair patient, with an existing house on rear half of lot, on property at 1920 Kilson Drive, in the R-1 District. Verne Tillotson, 1912 g. Malvern Street, Fuller~con, representing the applicamt~ presented communications from eleven persons in the vicinity favoring the Variance, and stated the new house would improve the setback line even though it is 1, O00 feet less than the 6,000 square foot minimum requirement. On motion of Councilman Reinly, seconded by Gould and carried~ action ~as continued to the next regular meeting. Con~numicatic~% was presented from the Planning Commission recommending denial of Variance Application No. 1~09, filed by Percy J. and Velma M. Harty, to build an Variance Appl.No.1309 ~Percy J. Harty ~ additional single-family dwelling on the rear part of the lot, with an existing single-family dwelling on the front part of the lot, on property at 2610 W. Pomona Street, in the ~-1 District. Robert Bizzell, 2501 g. Oak Street, Fullerton, repre- senting the applicant, stated the lots are small in thiz area, and the proposed prop- erty would be on the rear part of the lot, to be used for rental income, with adc- quate off-street parking Urovided. On motion of Councilman Brewer, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the ree~,~endation of the Planning Commission ~as approved, an~l !Variance Appl.No.1292 iAndrew F. Jannett iReso.No.60-8~ !Granting Variance Variance Application No. 1BO9 denied. afiain Conmmunication was/presented from the Planning Commission recommending denial of Variance Application No. 129~, filed by ~ndrew F. Jannett, to convert existing garaEe into s resl estate office and erect a real estate sign in accordance with regulations, preferably on top of existing block ~all, on property at 2011 North Grand Avenue~ in the R-~ District. Attorney Eugene Katnik, Bll W. 8th Street, representing the applicant, stated he had submitted to the Planning Department an e]evated plan of the proposed construction, and the Planning Director recommended separation from the existing dwelling with possible relocation of the building, in an easterly dir- eetion. Councilman Heinly remarked the applicant would incur heavy expense in changing the construction if the area is developed into Con~nercial use. Attorney Katnik stated the business uould be of a quiet semi-professional nature, and suffi- eient parking would be provided without interfering wdth ingress or egress. Council- man Brewer disqualified himself on this matter. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the following Resolution entitled: "Resolution No. 60-8~ granting Variance Application No. 1292 filed by Andrew F. Jarmett where Planning Con~nission reco~ended denial" Reso.No.60-85 Recomnending certain zoning for the "Seventeenth and Wright Streets N.E.Annex" was considered and passed by the following vote: Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dele M. Hein]y, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr. Absent, Councilmen None NotVot ing, Councilmen Bob Brewer A Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission wa.s presented recommending certain zoning for the "Seventeenth and Wright Streot~ N.E.Anne×." The Council having un- animously waived the reading of the R~solution, cm motion of CounciLman Gould, secon- ded by Heinly and carried, the following Resolution entitled: "Resolution No. 60-85 adopting and approving the recommendations of the Santa Ana Plarming Co~ission for zoning protection in areas northeast of Santa Aua presently kno~m as 'Seventeenth and Wright Streets N. E. ~mnex'" Variance Appl.No .1243 Anna P. Jansen Reso.No.60-86 (correcting and amend- lng Reso.No.60-73) was considered and passed by the follow~ng vote: Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen None Absent, Councilmen None Cu~,.~uication was presented from ~mna P. Jansen, requesting that the driveway be not less than ten feet on the east side of said property instead of the west s~de~ reference Variance ~pplication No. 12~3, granted April 18, 1960~ subject to condi- tions~ to establish parking lots at 1813 and ]817 W. 16th Street~ in the R-2 Dis- trict~ and waiving of ten-foot rear-yard requirement at 1832 W. 17th Street, in the C-1-PK District. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Reso- lution, on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried~ the folloM- ing Resolution entitled: "Resolution No. 60-86 correcting and amending Resolution No. 60-73 granting Variance on Application No. 12h3" ~as considered and passed by the following vote: Tentative Tract B J Haupert Ayes, Councilmen Noes, Councilmen Absent ~ Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Hein]y,A. A. Hall Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Bob B~ewer None On motion of Councilman Hubbard~ seconded by Gould and carried, action was post- poned until the next regular meeting on Tentative Tract Map No. 3769~ filed by B. J. Haupert~ creating 76 residential lots located east of Gunther ~treet and 250 Preliminary Record of Survey Maps and Tentative Tract Map feet north of Camille Street. On recormendation of the Planning Department ~md on motion of Councilman seconded by Heinly and carried, the following Preliminary Record of Survey Maps and! Tentative Tract Map were approved, as follows: Survey Map No.160 Thomas T. Alston Survey Map No. 162 B. J. Haupert SurweyMap No. 164 , RiJano, Incorporated Preliminary Record of Survey No. 160, filed by Thomss T. Alston, combining two lots located on the east side of Spurgeon Street approximately 350 feet north of 17th Street, subject to conditions, Preliminary Record of Survey No. 162, filed by B. J. Haupert, dividing two parcels iuto four parcels located between W. First Street (Bolsa Avenue) and West Camille Street, Just east of Gunther Street, subject to conditions, Preliminary Record of Survey No. 164, filed byRiJano, Incorporated, combinin~i twelve lots located at the southeast corner of Monte Vista Avenue and Townsend Street, subject to conditions, and Tract Map No.3775 S.V.Hunsaker and Sons Map of Tract No. 3665 Coordinated Service Preliminary Record i!of Survey Coffey Tentative Tract Map No. 3775, filed by S. V. Hunsaker and Sons~ creating 93 single-family lots located ou the west side of Verano Street, approximately 700 feet south of Bolsa Avenue (West First Street) subject to conditions. : On motion of Couucilman Gould~ seconded by Heinly and carried, Map of Tract No. 366~, filed by Coordinated Service, for the dedication of Hazard Avenue, Rhonda Avenue, C~no Avenue, Taft Street and Michael Street, for public use for highway pu_wposes, . and also offer for dedication all vehicular access rights to Hazard Avenue, except st street intersections and an ll-foot easement for drainage purposes, and bond in i the sum of $31,000.00 were approved~ license fee in the sum of $1,950.00 accepted, !i . and agreement covering improvements ordered signed. : Communication was presented from the Planning Department recommending approval of ii Preliminary Record of Survey, filed by Bert Coffey, dividing a parc'el located et th~ southwest corner of 17th and Spurgeon Streets, subject to conditions. The applican~ objected to certain conditions, stating that on a portion of his property there are four apartments, and the front part of the building encroaches upon the ten feet re- quired by the City for the future widening of 17th Street. Also, he desires to cone struct a store building on this parcel, and is unable to do so due to the Building /442 ~ode Regulations. The applicant advised the property is rectangular and he was not ~ Preliminary Record iof Survey No.163 !Evelyn Scofield aware there was any question of taking a ra&ius on 17th and ~purgeon 9treets, which would make it necessary to redesign the corner of the building. On motion of Coun- cilman Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the Preliminary Record of Survey Map was approved, subject to the following conditions: (1) Owner dedicate the north ten feet of the easterly 75 feet; (2) Owner enter into an agreement with the City for a continuing offer of dedication of the westerly 7B.46 feet of the northerly ten feet for street purposes, and that it be on condition that owner does not waive; any of his rights with respect to any damages in the future which may be incurred by reason of use of that ten feet~ that is~ damage to the building. (B) Final Recor~ of Survey Map be recorded. Communication was presented from the Planning Department recommending approval of Preliminary Record of Survey No. 16B~ filed by Evelyn Scofield, creating two lots located between Silver Drive and Fifth Street, approximately 850 feet west of Veran$ Street~ subject to conditions. Daniel Cohen, representing the appltcant~, objected to the condition of improvement of curbs~ gutters and side~mlks along the frontage of property at Silver Drive and Fifth Street~ and inquired if this could be done under an Assessment District. Also~ thi~ property goes through from one street to ?rel~mfuary Record ~of Survey No.165 ilJoseph Webber the other, and a duplex on the next street was completed without the construction street improvements. On motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and carri~ Preliminary Record of Survey Map No. !63 ~m~ approved, subject to the following con~ d~tlons: (1) Final Record of Survey Map be recorded; (2) Subdivider pay to the City a $50.00 Business License Te~ (3) Prior to a Utilities Release by the Build- ing Department all conditions be complied with. CounciLmen d . Roll Call ~yes, ,,/Royal E. Hubbar ~ Dale N. Heinly, ~ A. Hall Noes, Stanley C. C0uld~ .Yr.~ Bob Brewer Absent~ "None Communication was presented from the Planning Department recommending approval of Preliminary Record of Survey No. 165~ filed by Joseph Webber, creating three parcell located on the west side of Grand Avenue approximately 750 feet north of DeLhi Reed ~ubJect to conditions. John Hoy~ 844 No. Birch Street~ representing the applicant~ stated this six-acre property w~s originally ten acrec~ and the applicant was not a~are a Preliminary Mccord of Survey had to be f~led. Also, that Preliminary RecoN of Survey No. 166 takes care of the southerly portion of th~s Record of Survey, with reference to Preliminary Record of Survey No. 165, there i~ no object, on to th~ dedication of Grand Avenue only on the portion lying southerly of what will be St. Gertrude Place. On motion of coUncilman Neinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried~ Preliminary Record of Survey Map No. 165 ~s approved~ subject to conditions that the dedication snd improvement of said west side of Grand Avenue be completed priori! iiPrellminary Record of Survey No.166 S.P.I.Development Corp. to isauance o% any Utility Release by the Building Department, said condition being imposed separately on the north ~6h.95 feet and on the south 63~.52 feet~ and that dedication will take place in Preliminary Record of Survey No. 166~ and that all other conditions be imposed. Communication was presented from the Plarming Department recommending approval of Preliminary Record of Survey No. 166, filed by the S.P.I. Development ~orporation, creating four industrial parcels located on the west side of Grand Avenue~ approxi-~ mately 750 feet north of Delhi Rca d, subject to conditions. John Hey, representing the applicant~ stated they desired to eliminate the improvement of sidewalks s~nce 443 Request Santa Ana-Tustin Council of Churches reconsider Sections ~2~1 and ~232 (resorting) this property is being developed for industrial purposes~ especi~lly on ^nahurst Place and Hathaway Street as these are inter~or streets. On motion of Councilman Heinly seconded by Hubbard snd carried~ Preliminary Record of Survey Map No. 166 ~*as approved~ subject to conditions~ except that no s~de,~lkc be required on ~ay Street and ^nahurst Place. Mayor Hall said he had a ruling from the City Attorney that reconsideration of the repeal of Sections h231 and hSBR (resorting) would have to have been prior~ or at the ss~e time of the Cottucll Meeting an8 reconsideration must be made by one of those who voted for the repeal of this particular Ordinance. He further stated we have no action now before the City Council~ but we do have Sections ~l.O? and hl.lOi of the Los Angeles City Code presented by the Santa Ana-Tustin Council Of Churches requesting the adoption of these Sections. On motion of Councilman Gould~ seconde~ by Heinly and carried~ the Sections were received and filed. ~t the request ~f Councilman Brewer~ the Clerk read the Sections~ after which approximately sixty people stoa8 in favor of enacting these Sections. Reverend Garland Imcey of the Wilshire United Presbyterian Church stated it was connnon knowledge that S~nta has not only a City Council but also ~ Council of Churches which takes action. Fo~ this particular measure we, the Baptiats, Methodists and even Presbyterians did notii have a single dissenting vote. Everyone at the Civic Affairs Committee Meeting -- men~ women and the youth -- voted that these Or~inanees should not be repealed. Three members of the City Council have voted to repeal these Sections, and one member was willing to admit there is an error in his judgment. Please reconsider these Ordi- nances st your earliest convenience for the betterment of this City~ in the years that lie ahead. Reverend Robert P. Shuler of the First Methodist Church~ stated h~ had studied the reasons for the removal of these Sections~ and one of the reasons is that these Ordinances are unconstitutional. I would be interested to know if outside private opinion ha~ any right to feel these are unconstitutional~ if we ar~ worried about the constitutionality~ I think the courts should decide~ that~ as tha~ has more weight than our private opinion. You talk about civil rights being im- prove8 upon~ suppose~ I wanted to have a nmriJuana party in mv home~ then you woul~ have no right to serve any summous~ because you are infringing on mv personal liber~ ties. To say that a man's personal liberties are infringed upon because the laws about dope, prostitution~ etc. are such that the Police cs~not come into the home~/~ for the public good~ are ~ong~ and I cannot see any wlid reason~ or overt reason, or superficial reason why you should abolish these laws. T~o out of three say thief is a necessary law~ Reverend Glenn McFarland of the Reformed Presbyterian Church stated that several years ago he appeared before the City Council with regard to d~cing and drinking. Some of the Council Members gave the reason that Santa is a growing City and should have laws that would all~¢ for its growth. Certainly if our Sister City~ Los Angeles~ feels it is necessary to have 8n Ordinance concern lng resorting and the use of property for resorting: Santa Ana ~hould be concerned with ~ similar Ordinance, which ~,~i!l protect ourselves and the future generations. I implore you to consider this Ordinance again before taking a final step. Peverend Jay ~. ~eener of the Parkview Reformed Church said the Cotuncil Members should have uppermost in mind the stand of the people~ as they are elected by the people. I find it difficult to reconcile that if these Ordinances are not unconstitutional., ~here does the pr ~. u~ . cc~e from? Why is a change being made? Are you represent-~ this matter be very carefully considered, and if our Ordinances are somewhat vsg~le then perhaps',ye should pattern them after the Los Angeles Code. The M, yet asked if there were any further comments; there being none, the hearing w.~s declared closed. Councilman Gould answered the question of whether we are attempting to repeal absolve laws and said "Yes," and' about four months ago Councilman Hubbard and I'mde a stud~l of these Sections, and we think the Ordinance is tunfair. Coureilman Hein~y stated that insofar as th~s Ordinance is concerned, it allowed the Police Department to ha~ an unwarrsnted invasion of the right of prtvacy~ end that is the .exp!snstion of the unconstitutionality of it. I am not attempting to srguc the constitutionality of ti Lo~ Angeles Code Sections as not binding on eny courts in California, and ~t does not answer the question as far ms we are concerned. No member of th~s Council has a~y desire tc open up this to~m for indecency in any respect. Comnci]man Hubbard stated his opinion ~s still the same as before. Councilman Brewer remarked he ori- ginally made the motion and still maintains he was misinformed. I do think our Ordinance was -~rong in part~ and since that time I have talked to other attor~eys~ not members of this Council. I still feel the same as I did t~.~o weeks ago~ but cannot do anything more to bring it back on the flOor. Mayor Hall stated the Cotrac~i. is aware of his thinking~ and that the people do realize the Ordinance h~s gone to ~! Reso.No.60-87 Agreement with State Improve Fourth Street Overcrossing Petition "Seventeenth and Wright Streets N.E. Annex" second reading, and it takes one of the majority to bring it back on the floor. City Attorney stated we are bound by the Roberts Rules of Order end that the motion must have been made th~ same day or the next regular business day thereafter, being Tuesday, April 19~ 1960. On motion of Councilmen Gou]d~ seconded by Hubbard and carried, a five-minute recess was declared. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, sec- ended by~Heinly and carried, the petitions containing approximately 83 signatures, in protest of the repeal of Sections 4231 snd 4239, were received and fi]ed. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution~ on motion of Council~mn Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the following Resolution entit].~: "Resolution No. 60-87 authorizing execution of Agreement No. 965 with California Department of Public Works, Division of Highway~ for improvement of Fourth Street from Fourth Street overcrosslng structure to Tustln Avenue" at the estimated costs for right-of-way of $10,880.00 and for construction of $20,000.00, was considered and passed by the ~o]_l.o~ng vote: Ayes: Counc~lmen Royal E. Hubberd~ Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale H. ~einly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen None Absent, Councilmen None A petition was presented signed by approximately 236 persons residing in the pro- posed "Seventeenth and Wright Streets N. E. Annex" protesting the annexation of their properties to the City of Sauta Ana, snd on motion of Councilmen Gouid, sec- onded by Helnly and carried., the petition was received and filed. Mm. E. E. Camp- bell, 16731 Fairhaven Avenue, stated his property is located between the Cities of Orange and Santa ~ma and was not desirous of being annexed to any City; that peti- tions were circulated by M. O. Dunston, O. F. Morricol, G. H. Bishop, John Brawley, J. Henry Mueller, C. Rohrs~ Lewis Young and himself, and there are two or three people in the area who wish to be annexed, but the majority of the property owners, who vere approached to sign the petition, ~ere unanimous in stating they did not ~i~h to come into the C~ty. Glenn Beckwith, 13231 Ethelby Way, stated they would prefer to remain in the County~ and if we are annexed to a City would prefer l~stiu. Mayo~ 445\ Eight Arterial Highway Agreements btn County and City Bolsa Avenue, et al and Elmer L. Benson Escrow Instructions Reso .No.60-88 Accept Deeds ~.Frank Warren,Jr., ~arriet Chapman ~utler, et al Reso .No. 60-89 Accept Deeds Henry Buckwalt er, Scott and Company, et al Hall stated the City of Santa Ana attempts to make it desirable for the people on the boundaries to wish to come into the City. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer end carried, proper officials were authorized to execute the eight Arterial Highvay Financing Agreements between the County and the City for the following projects: Bolsa Avenue, from Harbor Boulevard to 600 feetWes~sxine, Project No. ~7 Edinger Street, from the Santa ~na River to Center Street, Project No. 51 Fifth Street: from Harbor Boulevard to the Santa Ana River, Project No. 52 Grand Avenue, between McFadden Street and Delhi Road, Project No. 61 Fairview Street, between Delhi Road. and Segerstrom ;.venue, Project No. 68 Fairview Street, between McFadden Avenue sn~ First Street, Project No. 69 Fairview Street~ between Fifth Street mhd Westminster Avenue, Project No. 7! Segerstrom Avenue, between Harbor Boulevard and Greenville Street, Project and with Elmer L. and ;lice M. Benson, dated April 8, 1960, for the payment of the~? oroportionat~ share of one-half of standard sewer cost for 125.10 feet on the nort~ feet ~ide of 17th Street, and hll.~s on Old Tustin Avenue. ! It was moved by Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried~ that escrow instructions be approved and sfgned for certain properties end with the following persons: E~crow Instructions No. ~758-C, dated April ~ 1960, with Fidelis M. and Joseph.e Wurth, conv~ying street easement on the north side of First Street west of Sullivan, for the ~.idening of First Street, iu the sum of $13~.00, Escrow InstExctions No. 44745-C, dated April 19, 1960, with Harriet Chapmsm Butler~ conveying street easement on the north side of First Street west of Sulli- van, for the widening of First Street, in the sum of $1,~20.00, Escrow Instructions No. 4h737-C, dated April 15, 1960, with Richard and Esthe~ Hnster, conveying street easement on the north side of First Street east of Sulli- van, for the widening of First Street, in the sum of $320.00, and Escrow Instructions No. ~h746-C, dated April 19, 1960, with J. Frank Warren, Jr. and Charlotte L. Warren, granting street easement on the north side of First Street west of King, for the widening of First Street, in the sum of $3,330.00. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolutlou, on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the following Resolution entitl~ "Resolution No. 60-88 accepting deeds where City is paying cash consideration" from J. Frank, Jr. and Charlotte L. Warren, granting street easement on the north side of Fir~t Street, west of King, for the widening of First Street, in the sum of $3,330.00; from Harriet Chapman Butler, for street easement on the north side First Street, West of Sullivan, for the widening of First Street, in the sum of $1,~20.O0; from Fidelis M. and Josephine ~urth, for street easement on the north s~de of First Street west of Sullivan, for the widening of First Street, in the suml of $133.00; and from Richard and Esther Haster, for street easement on the north side of First Street east of Sullivan, for the widening of First Street, in the stm of $320.00, was considered and passed by the following vote: Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale ~. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen None Absent, CounciLmen None The Council having unanimously %~ived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the following Resolution entitle~: "Resolution No. 60-89 accepting deeds where City is paying no cash consideration" from Henry and Mary Buclc*alter, for street easement on the south side of Bishop west of Halliday~ from Scott and Company, for street easement on the west side of Main Street north of Edgewood Road; from Harry R. Martin and P. L. Pyle, conveying land for Maywood Street at Lyon;f~omJ. & O. M., Inc., for drainage easement in Tract No. 3637;from Greschner-Rabec, a partnership, for sewer easement north of f 446 First Street; and from Southern Pacific Company· for street easements for proposed Ga~nsey· Central and B:l.reh Streets· south of Del.hi, ~md a portion of the south half of De.~/~i Road· x~ms considered and passed by the ~ollo~rlng vote: Reso .No .60-90 Adopt Budg~t~ ~mnd approve First Supplemental ~.Gas Tax Fiscal Year 1959-60 Reso.No.60-91 Correcting and Amending Reso.No.60-1 granting ii Variance Appl.No. l~2B (Bank of America)i~ Ayes· Councilmen Noes, Councilmen Absent, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.· Dale H. Heinly· Bob Brewer, A. A. Nail None None The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution· on mo~ion of cOUncilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried· the following Resolution entitl "Resolution No. 60-90 of the City Council of the City of Santa Bna adopting budget and approvlug First Suppl.~mental Memorandum of Agreement for expenditures of gas tax allocation for major city streets" for the fiscal year 1959-60· ~s considered and passed by the follo~iug vote: Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. 5%lbbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale N. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes; Co~Lncl~],en ~one Absent: Councilmen None The Council having un,%nimously w~ived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Co~mciiman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the fo]]o~.~ing Resolution entitleg: "Resolution No. 60-91 correcting and amending Resolution No. 60-1 granting Variance on Application No. 1223" Reso.No.60-92 Quitclaim Deed Kenneth Price i Ordinance No .NS-448 !Establish future r/w !islti~ee~tPort ions Fxtinger · First Street- IBolsa Avenue and Dyer Road Ordinance No. NS-449 Amending Building Code ~edestrian canopy) filed by the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, that condition numbered 1 in Resolution No. 60-1 is h~reby corrected and amended to read as follow "1. That the face or perpendicular front w~ll of the building shall be constructed no closer than 6 feet 6 inches from the street r~ght of ~ay lines·" ~as considered and passed by the following vote: Ayes· Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard· Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale H. Heinly, Rob Hre~.~er~ A. A. Hall Noes· Councilmen None Absent, Councilmen None The Council having lznanimously %~~tved the reading of the Resolution~ on motion of Councilman Nubbsrd~ seconded by Heiuly and carried~ the follo,~f, ng Resolution entitle "Resolution No. 60-92 authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed to Kerkneth and Merc~a Price" for a ]2-foot str~p of ].and ~nn~ng between Su!]ivan and Falrviev~ Streets at Monte Vista Avenue~ ~ms considered and passed by the follo~.~ng vote: ~es~ Co~ci~en ~oyal E. ~ubbard~ Stanley C. G~ld~ Jr.~ Dale ~. ~einly~ Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes~ Co, often None Absent~ Co~ci~en None ~e Co~ci/ having unan~ously waived the r~ding of the Ord~n~ee~ on motion of Co~uciLman Hubbsrd~ seconded by Mefnly and carrfed~ the ~ol]o~ing ~dinance entitle~. futnre right-of-~y lines First Street-Bolsa ;.venue "Ordinance No. NS-h48 establishing along portions of Edinger Street, and Dyer Road" ~as considered and passed by the fei. lowing Mote: Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer~ A. A. Hall Jr. ~y~., Councilmen Royal E. ~{ubbard· Noes~ Cou~ncilmen Stanley C. Gould, Absent· Councilmen None The Council having unanimously ~.~aived the reading of the Ordinance, on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the follow,lng Ordine~ce entitled "Ordinance No. NS-h49 amen~tng Uniform Building Code; 1955 Edition, to add specie! provis~on for pedestrian canopy" ~as considered and passed by the follo~¢ing vote: Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould~ Bob Brewer, A. Ao Hall None None Jr., Dale H. Heinly, Ayes, Coun ciL~en Noes, Couneilmer Absent; Councilmen Proposed Ordinance regulating taxicabs, motor buses, etc. Communication City P.T.A.Council Municipal Bowl Communications Boundary C~!ssion, City of E1 Centre, et al Plans and Speci- fications East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Plans and Specifi- cations-Sanitary sewer First Street, Project No.25; Widen Eighth St., Project C-44. Request iGarden Grove iPolice Association O? motion cf Councilman Heinly~ seconded by Gould and csrried~ the proposed Ordi- nance re~!~ting t~icabs, motor buses, ambulances e~d the drivers thereof, ~s postponed until the next regular meeti~E. Comm~nicatiou was read from the Santa Aha Parent Teacher Association Council re- commending reconsideration by the City Council in regard to the Municipal Bo~.rl to be operated by the City as a eomm~mity facf]_ity and not by the schools. On moticmi of CounciLman Gould, seconded by Hubbard end carried, the communieatlon was 're- ceived, and filed. On motion of Cotmei]ma~ Hubbard., s~conded by Gould amd carried~ the follow.zing com- munications ~.zere received and filed: From the Boundary Co~mtssion resardi~$~osed an~exation of territory to th~ City of Santa ,~ua "Seventeenth and Brrfght]~'. ~ ~zmex," and advdsing the boundarie~ ce the proposed annexatffon sro reasonab]y definffte end certain although it cuts proDerty lines~ Fro~ the Boundary Commission regarding proposed annexation of territory to thi Anuex,~tion No. l~," and advising the bom~daries of the proposed City off Orange" annexation are reasonably definite and certain, From the Boundary Commission regardffng proposed annexation of territory to th~ o~" and advising the boundaries of thc pro- City of Garden Grove "Annexation No. ~., posed annexation are reasonably definite and certain, From the City of E1 Centre submitting certified copy of ~esolution No. 60-18 requesting the producers, distributors and exhibitors of motion pictures in this area to cease forthwith the presentation of fi]ms to the public which are salacffou~ in ~ature~ etc., and constituting a menace to the morals of the citizens of E1 Centre and the people as a whole, From the Orange County Chapter of National Electrical Contractors advising they wholeheartedly support the Uniform Electrical Code as being of mltua~ benefit to all amd ~.~ould like to discuss its acceptance and the issues at From the Manager, Santa /~a Ch.mmber of Cor~erce, submitting copies of report regarding the Governor's Conference on Public ~Ibraries Serriees and suggesting that actio~ be taken through the Orange County a~d California I~ag~ze of Cities urging other cities to adopt Resolutions opposing State aid, From the Secretary, Santffago P.T.A., expressing pleasure that the Book Mobile!! has been approved, end for reasons of safety and convenience hope that Santiago Scho~ will be made one of the scheduled stops, ?~titlbn signed by eight mothers of the Caravans Trailer Park requesting a school g~rd or patrolman posted on the corner of South Sulliva~ an, Monte Vista Streets for protection of children attending Monte Vista School, as this is a deso~ late ares. surrotmded by groves~ From Weverend Georg~ J. Busdiec~er, Chairman, Union Services Commlttee~ Aha C~.mcil of Churches, expressing sincere thamks to the City Council for making available to them the use of the Municipal Bow]. for the Sunrise Services on Easter; Sunday, and Notifications of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of Beverage Ap-i p!ications of Nc~ct's Incorporated~ 101 So. Harbor Boulevard~ from Ceorge ~J. Lind- lan and [~ath]een D. Turner, 311 ~. ~ristol Street: from James 0. Thornburg, 1211 E. Wirst Street, and Isabe!~nd Jose B. Resales, 502 No. Verano Road. Om motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried~ the plans and speeificatioms were approved for the construction of East Garden Grove-Wfntersburg!l Channel (Bond ~roJect C-5). ~n motion of Councilman Hubbard~ seconded by Brewer and c~rried, the plans and specifications were approved and the Purchasing Agent authorized to advertise for bids to be opened. June 6~ 1960~ on the following pro.~eets: Construction of a sanitary sewer from First Street to the intersectfon of ~i~th and Mabury Streets, and along First Street to the East City Limits, Project No. 25, and ~.liden~ng of Eighth street bet~reen To~mseDd Street and Artesia Street, and construction of s parking lot at E1 Sa!vadore Park, Project Comm%mication ~.~s presented from the Garden Grove Police Association, Inc., reques~ ~ng the City to issue an exempt license to their Association for the sale of tJckets to their Police Ball, to be held June 3: 1960, to raise money for their benevolentl fund. On motion of Co~mcilman Hoinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the req'je~ ~.~as denied, inasmuch as .our own Police Benevolent Association is not permitted th~[~ privilege. 448 UPetition .Improve east half Harper Street ,~lalms for personal Ruby'Nell Blackwood and Melvina L.Tit chenal Applications to Solicit Funds Petition 3ewer Assessment )istrict-Verano, !Hazard,Newhope ~nd 5th Street Reset hearing date !'Bairns Annex Nc.l" ~erm!nation of Proceedings i'South Santa kua Anne~ No.2' ~equest ~ity Schools [crosswalk at 17th Street and College Ave.) Reso.No.60-93 Parking Zones iBroadway btn i~cFadden Ave. and !Oubbon Street ~eso.No.60-9~ Remo~e 2~-min~te Park- ingZ~ne -Wa]-uut St. i~btnBroadway and iBirChStreet A petition ~.s presented signed by approximately ten property o~raers requesting thet action be tsken to acquire an~ improve the east half of HsrDer Street from Sugar Avenue to a point 1190 feet north, and on motion of Councilman H~bbard~ seconded by Hefnly and carried, the request ~s referred to the Department of Public Works for investigation smd proper action. Ou motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and c~rried, the followdng claims were referred to the City attorney and Insurance Carrier: Ruby Nell Black-~ood~ 1900 E. Vincente Street~ Con%Ycon, for alleged personal inJuries~ in the amount of $5%000.00, due to lack of warning signs at a dead end street at 400 E. Edinger Street, causing her automobile to run off the road, and Melvina M. Titchenal, 812 .No. Olive Stree% for elleged personal injuries, in the amount of $53~B17.50, due to a fall on the sidewalk at 701 No. Flower Streeti. On motion of Councilman Hubbard~ seconded by Brewer and carried~ the following appli- cations to solicit funds were granted: Orange County Council of National Multiple Sclerosis~ in association with the Southern California Chapt~e~, to solicit f~mds May 8 through June 1% 1960~ for research into the cause and cure of Multiple Sclerosis~ patient care and rehsbili- tation clinics for MS victims, Community Clubs and Camping Secretary~ Young Men's Christian Association~ 205 W. Eighth Stree% to solicit funds, through the sale of peanuts, the night of April 25 and including July l, 1960, to provide funds for yo%%ngsters to go to camp~ and Ernest E. Kellogg Post No. 1680~ Veterans of Foreign Wars, to solicit fund~ ar sell poppies on the streets, Wmy 20th and 21st, 196% by both members of Post 1680 and the Ladies ' Auxiliary. A petition was presented signed by approximately 47 persons requesting the Departm~ ~t of Public Works to prepare a petition to initiate a Sewer Assessment District in th~ area bounded by Verano Street on the west~ Hazard Avenue on the north~ Newhope Aver on the east and 5th Street on the south. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seeonde~ by Heinly and carried: the petition was referred to the Department of Public Works for investigation and proper action. It was moved by Councilman Hubbard~ seconded by Fein]y and carried~ thst the heari~ date on the "Bairns Annex No. 1" be reset to ~mgust 1~ 1960, On motion of Councilman Hubbard~ seconded by Heinly and carried, the annexation designated "South Santa ~na Annex No. 2" was declared null and void and all_ proceed~ ings terminated under the Inhabited Act. ii It was moved by Councilman Hubbard~ seconded by Heinly and carr~ed~ that the requesll of the Secretary of City Schools be denied for s crosswalk to be located approximat midwsy between Bristol Street and College Avenue, for students parking on the north side of 17th Street. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the ~esolution, on motion of Councilman Heinly~seconded by Hubbard and carried, the fo]lowing Mesolution entltl~. "Resolution No. 60-93 concerning parking limitations and curb markings in accordance therew-lth" establishing No Parking Zones on the west side of Broadway between McFadden Avenue and Cubbon Street, as reco~m~ende8 by the Department of Publ~_c Works~ ~.s consider~ and passed by the follmcing vote: Ayes, Councilmen Boya! E. Hubberd, Stanley C. Gou].d, Jr., Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen None Absent~ Councilmen None The Council having unanimously %~Jvedthe reading of the Resolutio~ on motion of Councilman Hubbard, second*d by Heinly and carried, the following Resolution entlt~d: "ResolutionNo. 60-91! eoneerni~ parking limitations a~d curb markings in accordsnee therewith to remove the 2h-minute Parking Zones on the south side of Walnut Street b~twee~ 449 Request Temple Beth Shol~n Rose.No.60-95 Two-hour Parking-Pine St. (Ray McCoy Motor Company, Inc. ) Drainage problem Westminster Blvd. Jack E. McLean (Charlie ' s E1 Rancho ) Reso.No.60-96 "Stop" signs Ross St.mt ~19th St. (Mrs. James Fi~ np~e~ and R. N. Scove~ iReso .No. 60-97 Remo~e 24-minute Parking ~! Zone -Broadway otc ibrd and 4th Streets (Charles Cohen) adopted b~pril 5, 1951, as recommended by the Depsrtment of ~ub]Ic Works, ,~ms con- sidere~ and passed by the fol!c+~ng vote: Ayes, C~u~cilmen Royal. E. Hubbard, Stanley C. GoulS~ Jr., Dale H. Heinly, Bob Rre~er, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen None Absent, Councilmen None ~ m~ion of C~ci~ Hubbard: seconded by ~ewer and ca~ied~ the request of T~mple Both Sholom, 206 E. 8th Street, to close off the street in front of the Temple to hold a carnie! on Sunday, May 2~, 1960, fro~ 12 Noon to 5:30 P.M. for the purpose of raising funds for their youth groups, ~.ms granted, subject to condi- tions set forth by the Department of Public Works. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the following Resolution entitled: "Resolution No. 60-95 prohibiting parking in excess of t,re hours on the south side of Pine Street, between Main Street snd Sycamore Street" reference request of Ray McCoy Motor Cc~pany, Inc., xcas considered and passed by th~ fo].lo~.~ing vote: Ayes~ Counci]3nen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale N. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen None Absent, Co~nci!men None Co~m~mication was again presented from Jack E. McLean, 12835 East Westminster Boules yard, advising need for correction of the drainage problem along Westminster Avenue west of the river bridge to Sidney Street, and stating there is a serious traffic hazard. The Manager orally reportedthat the correction of this drainage problem would not be timely due to the expense involved, and recommended that the Director of Public Works include this project in his next budget. On motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and. carried, the communication was received, filed., and!! the Clerk instructed to notify Mr. McLean that the Department of Public Works was directed to include this project in the next budget. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by GouTd and carried, the following Resolution entitle~: "Resolution No. 60-96 concerning intersection control in accordance t here~clth" and inDtalllng "Stop" sign designating ali. north and south bound traffic on Ross Street shall "Stop." to traffic on Nineteenth Street, and repealing and rescinding Resolution No. 56-P8]. adopted November 5, ]956, was considered and passed by the follow5 ng vote: byes, Councilmen Royal E. ~Wubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale R. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen None Absent Councilmen None The Council having una~imously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Resolution entitledt "Resolution No. 60-97 concerning parking limitations and curb i markings in accordance therewith" repesling and rescinding Resolution No. 60-62, adopted April 4, 1960, for 24-m~nuteii Parking Zones on the ~.~est side of Broadway, betveen 3rd and ~th Streets, reference request of Charles Cohen, was considered and passed by the following vote: byes, C~uncilmen Noes, Cottnci]mlen Absent, Councilmen Stanley C. Gould~ Jr., Dale H. Heinly Bob Brewer, A. ~. Hall Royal E. ~ubbard None Clerk of the It ~.rz~ moved by Councflman Hubbard, o..Conded by Gou_d ,~nd carr_~d~ that in v. _, C~cil ~ s~ ~ existing in the office of the Cler]~ of the Co~%nci~ during~ (Pa~ent of the ~pecial c~rc~t~.~c o over-t ~e ) ~ ~ 75- the c~!endar yeer 1959~ ~en the :~ork cf the o~ice ~.:as gre~.t!y co~licated by the retirement of }~s. ~a H~ter~ the continuing tu~-over ce per$cnne!~ c .... t~tuti~g a major po~on of the vorking force of the office and the increase of trsnsactfons han~led~ the C~cil hereby rec~nize~ that the efficient operation of the off~ce ~ require8 the ccnst~t attendance of the newly-appe~nte8 Clerk of the Counctl~ Marion $uttner~ and ~t is~ therefore~ ordered that Marion Suttn~r be credit~8 w~th ea~ed over-time to the extent of 28-1/2 days as of December 3], 1959, ss the equi-;~ valent of time off to ~ich she ~as entitled In that year and ~able%o take due to~ the requirements and best interests on the City. On moticm of Councilman }{ubbard~ seconded by Gould and csrr!ed, the City Counc.~l , ;3PPOVFD: adjourned to Monday, Msy 9, 1960~ at 5:00 P.M. in the Cc~mcil Chamber.