The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About86-001CTT¥ COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 86-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF BENEFIT AND THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEE PROGRAMS FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AND THE FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANS- PORTATION CORRIDORS. WHEREAS, buildout of the land use element of the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana is dependent upon providing a balanced transportation system to serve the planned level of development; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that implementation of the San Joaquin Hills, Foothill and Eastern Transportation Corridors will result in a transportation system which has the capacity to accommodate the additional traffic volume associated with anticipated future development; and WHEREAS, implementation of the San Joaquin Hills, Foothill and Eastern Transportation Corridors will help to relieve congestion on the existing transportation system; and WHEREAS, future state and federal revenue are projected to be inadequate to construct said transportation corridors in a timely manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that future development should pay a share of the cost of implementing new transportation corridors to insure that the transportation system will be adequate to serve said development and that this share of the corridor costs should be proportional to the traffic generated by the development; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. N$-]829 of the City of Santa Ana provides for the establishment of major thoroughfare and bridge construction fees to be paid by building permit applicants in the City of Santa Ana; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on the possible adoption of the fee program was given to all affected property owners as provided in Government Code Section 65091; and WHEREAS, the property owners within the area of benefit did not file a majority written protest to the establishment of the San Joaquin Hills or the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Fee Program; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued as a result of initial studies prepared to assess the environmental impacts which might be associated with the adoption of the major thoroughfare and bridge fee program. 003 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: SECTION 1. The boundaries of the areas of benefit shall be described in the document dated July 1985 entitled "Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor and the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridors" ("Program") attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION 2. The estimated cost of these major thoroughfares and bridges are as follows: San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor $341,660,000.00 Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor $516,147,000.00 The Program is presently designed to collect 48.4% of the cost of construction of the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor and 48.5% of the cost of construction of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridors. SECTION 3. The fees for development within the areas of benefit are based on the trip ends generated by the development as determined from the Trip Generation Tables included in the Program and shall be assessed upon new development based upon the number of dwelling units included in the development (for residential projects) or the gross square footage of the development (for non-residential projects) in those amounts as set forth in the Area of Benefit Fee Table included in the Program. SECTION 4. An automatic adjustment of the fees, based upon the Construction Cost Index, shall be made each fiscal year commencing in fiscal year 1986-1987. An adjustment of the fee based upon updated project cost estimates or other changed conditions shall be made in lieu of the Annual Cost Index Adjustment when necessary. SECTION 5. The collection of the fee shall be a condition of issuance of a building permit as described in the Program. The payment of fees may be deferred for all residential rental projects or projects which include State or Federal requirements to provide units affordable to families with incomes less than 80% of the median income for those time periods and subject to those terms and conditions set forth in Section IX of the Program. Fee credits shall be granted for dedications and work performed for the corridors as set forth in Section XI of the Program. SECTION 6. In the event the City executes the "Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency" and/or the "Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency" ("Agreements"), upon the effective date of said Agreements, the City shall remit all fees collected pursuant to the Program to the Joint Powers Agencies created by said 2 o Agreements pursuant to the terms and conditions of said Agreements. In the event the City executes said Agreements, any person aggrieved by a decision of the City regarding the amount of any corridor fee imposed or fee credit granted may appeal the decision of the City to the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency or the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, where appropriate, which decision shall be final. SECTION 7. This Resolution shall be effective upon the effective date of Ordinance No. N$-1829 , establishing the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program. PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council Ana at an adjourned meeting held on the 6th 1986. of the City of Santa day of January , Daniel E. Griset Mayor 0'05 ATTEST: //~a~ice C. Guy /f,~L~ Clerk of the C6~nci/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~er COUNCILMEMBERS: Griset Aye Johnson -~y Acosta Aye Hart Aye Luxembourger ~ McGuigan Aye Young aye 007 M;~'OR. THOgOUGHFAR~ AND BRIDGE FE-E PRDGRA~ SAN JOAOUIN ~IL/.S T~tANSPO~ATION CORP~DOR AND FOOTHILL/FASTE~N TP~RSPO~TATION CORRIDORS ~nv£rom~en~.al Management. Agency T=ansport'.ation,'Flood Control Program Office JULY 1985 E~ahibit C 009 X XZ XZZ XZZZ TABLE C~ COh*T~TS 3 4 ? 8 21 2]. 2'l 24 24 DT20-4 0i0 LIST OF ~hl~ITS Z ZZ III VZ VZZ ~ZZZ ZX x TABLE NO. IV-i ZV-2 VZZ~I VIZ.-2 V*'ZZZ-Z V'ZZZ-2 VZZZ-3 TITL~ PAGE Resolution 82-598, T~a~r~atton Corridor AlII Of Znfluen~ for Cogri~ Ulerl, 30 Area of ~nefi=, San 3~in Hills Tra~r=a=ion Co==~dor ~ea of ~nef~, F~ll~a~t~ T~a~c~a~on Co=r~dor~ 32 Fee Pr~ Share of To~ Corr~do~ Cost, ~C 33 F~ ?r~r~ Share of ToC~ ~rri~r Col~, F~ 35 CoI~ Per Tr~p ~d Analylis, ~C 37 Daily Vehicle Trip Genera~ion Race~ 39 ~ZST OF F~ Pr~r~ ~h~e of Corrl~r ~ll of Beheld= Fees PA(~ *7 10 13 16 l? 18 18 I. DT20-4 011 FOR can no lofl~er be expected Chat facilities such a· CAe San ~oaquiA Hills T~anspo~Cat£on Corcido: (So'IlTC) and F~ocAill/Baste~n T~ansportJtion Corridors (F/ETC) can be fully ~ua~e~ £rom ~he tradic£onel revenue sources used to fund£ng sources muse ~ece~oce ~ ~o~ ~ ~ese ~c~n~ ~peno ~ O~nge C~nc~'o ~r~a~on ~ are ~ ~ deve~d ~ pc~de re~e~ co ~in~ra~ areu. ~vel~nC ~ass ~eprasefl~ a ~cenCial suppleMn~al ~ing ~ar~ a~ as su~ ~ ~en ~e~ ~nsideca~i~ ~ ~e ~rd o~ S~rvisocs loc ~ 2~. ~e dev,Jlopsen~ fee program prepared loc Bo·rd of Supervisors ~onsidera~lo~ is based upon ~ovsrmmenc Code SectionJ 50029, 66484.3 end Califormi& Constitution Article 11, Section 7. The concept As furcAe~uore based on CAe general p~£nciple ~hat ~uCure developlMnt within pre$cr£bed benefit areas will £rcn the construction of ~he ~raflll:Or~ltion f&cilities and should pay for them ia proporti~ ~ projected corridor traffic demand att~ib~cable ~o CAe development. ?UCGFe ~evelopmeflt wicAIA CAe bemefit areas is expec'.e~ to account fc~ 48~ of CAe cost Of ~he Su'KTC ·nd F/ETC. The re~aiAiAg cost of the corridors, repre·entiAg benefits derived bM existing development viCAin ~he benefit areas and corridor users outsi~e CAe bene£it areas, is proposed to ba fum~ed cArough trediCiomal tt·r,t!x)~CACiom .'un, sAg So, roes ·uch as exisciA~ federal end irate progr=~-. No sesesseemt o~ eal·tiAg ~evelope~ property propose~. Corridor usage 'p~oJec~loms ~or several hunted ~TaZfic a~ysis zones vi~.hia · cae Co~n~ ~re developed as · tool Co assist ia defiaiag CAe p~oposed areas. ~Xaffic analysis zones wlCA 66 o~ Bore o~ CAeir CeCAl trap =.,king utAli=i~g ~ co~rido~ forme~ · fairly ,~enee ~atterrA. X~em~i~iaMle ea~lia~ ~se~ ~n ~i~ ~ o~ ~e ~za. ~a~l~ ~al~ zones vica 8~ or ~e o~ ~i~ ~i ~rip ~ki~ uC~l=l~ ~ ~d~ ~ de~ned ia ~e higher ~se m~ CA). ~e Fuia~e: of ~e ~s ~re de~in~ ~ ~e XM~ ~ z~e (B). AJseasuent of ~se· on · ~.ca~ic related basis vas dete~mined co be equitable. Tr~p ends were selected as the least co~uofl den~iaator and fees va~e es~ablished bM dividing CAe p~opor~lon of corridor cost attribu~able to each fee zone bM ~.~e to,al n~mber o~ p=o~C~ ~ Crip I~l vl~ each ~ee z~e. MJusmnu ~e Male ~o ~ci9 e~s M~n ueigh~h~ m~cial and Fasiden~ial la~ uses ~ ~e~l~ ~e ralaCi~ ~ne~i~ o~ neig~rh~ general ~ ~ caC~oties 62 tesidea~ial a~ ~ ~casAdenciil) ~o~ ~e -1- 012 F~I ~o~ ~ch o~ 'the ~ee zonss within the &~ea~ o~ bens~it are~ Single Family ~tultl-Unit Res iden~.lal Besidentl. al .~lon-Residenti&l ~one A $1,30S/unit $760/un1~ $1.75/s£. ~ons B $1,010/unit $$90/unit $1.30/s£. Zone & $1,295/Gnit $?SS/unit $1.80/s£. ~Qae 3 $ g20/~nit $$3S/unit $1~05/s£.. Developers who &re =equired tx) cor~t=uct portions o£ the T.~e amount of credit viii not ~4 adjusted vi~h sasequent revisfons ~o she progra~ once it is M~ori&lized ~ agree, aerie. This c~ndi~ My ~e ~o anon. her landowner within ~e sa,~ ira of benefit only vi~h title ~ ~he land. Pal~ent of ieee for residential multi-~n£'~ rental pro~e~ts My ~ ~e~ecz~ ~oc enter into ~ Properties ~£ch are exempt ~ro~ pal~aent o8 property ~ax~l will generally except f~a paymemc of corridor ieee. ~over.n~ntal o~me~ and *oneCructed ~ortions off twelve cities ace included violin ~e ~ens~iC areas ~nd F/E'I~. Tme County ~M adopt a ff~ pe~r~ only vl~in ~t un~r~ra~ are~. ParCici~ion ~ cities, ~e=etore, is ~ ~=~t ingtedien~ ~ a s~ess~ul p~=~ ~a~ d~s not crea~ ine~iCies co a~lis~ ~ls ~r~se. -2- 013 N~30R THOROOG~Fa~E ~ ~LTDGK F~E PROG1ULH FOR TI~NSPOI~TXON COIt~DORS !. aRC,GROUnD Govarrment Code Sections SOO2~ aod 6~484.3 a~ Cali£ornia Cormt£tut£on ~t~cle ~, ~ction 7 ~i~ ~e es~lii~n: of L~l ordinals :o recite ~ent o~ ~eee as a condition o~ approval ~ a ~i~l ~p or as a ~it~ o~ lliu~g a ~ld~ng ~i~ ~ot ~s o~ de~tay~ng ~e sotua~ ot eet~uC~ ~st of ~t:u~ng bt~d~s ~e: ~te~ays, taiLw~s, ~:H~ys a~ chins, o: ~s:tuc:~ng ~ot ~t~gh~ates. Pursuant to ~he above provisions of the Goverrdnent Code, and the Police Po~ets the ~oard of Supervisors adopted Section 7-9-316 of the Orange ~ounty Codified OtdL, tances providing for the ostablish~eflt off ~a~o~ thoroughfare and bridge construction fees to be paid by eu~dividers and building pernit applicants in the Coun:y o£ Orange. On ~ptil 2~., 1882, the Board of Supervisors, by Resol'.,tioa 82-598, directed t.~e F. qviroe~ent~l Management Agency (L'4A) to UegL~ analyzing ~y Tta~t~t~on C~lssion - ~a~t~tion Fiance S~u~ a~ to pr~ vi~ ~e ee~abl~nt o~ a ~ pt~t~. ~e ~rd, ~ur~e~te, detet~in~ ~a: de.lo, ts o~ su~ivisioM ~ich ~nM~ ~t:lons o~ ~y ~ra~r~:i~ ~t:~:, G!d d~icate tigh:~ay, grade a~ ~flsttuct m~es~ry ~r:ioms o~ ~e ~rtidot a~ ~rtici~:e ~ ~y esMblishe~ ~t:idot ~ pt~rae. 0n February 15, 1983 the loatd of Supervisors, by bsolu~lon 83-239, iden- Ci~i~ iflcer~ areas o~ ~c~ ~ot ~e S~ J~ H~lls and ~ill/hs~eta Tra~r~ion ~tzidots ~ dir~ ~ to t~lte lU~ividers ~ enter into ~ac~ ~ ~r:Act~te ~ ~ttidor i~ple~mt- atioe ~ing ee~blia~nt o~ a ~ee P~i~ C~ssl~ ~or t~nda~ions. Public mt~s ~re subse- ~en~y held ~ ~e Pla~g m~ssion ~ ~o~r 11 a~ ~ 1, 1983 On January 30, 1984 ~e P~aaning ~.ission &dopted Resolu~ion No. 45-83 Bridge Fee Pr~r~ ~ot ~e San Joa~ Hill ~a~r~tion Corridor ~d ~ ~il~:e~n Tt~t~l~ ~r:ldor. October 3, 1984 the Board of Suparvisots, ~ ltelolu:lon 84-1462, ~ln~ra~ ~ge ~ ~or ~e ~n J~ Hills and ~lys~ of ~e f~ pt~t~ ~ Ot~ge C~ty, Orate C~n~ TruantS:ion -3- 014 benefit ,~ave lead ko ~ ravie4o~s contained within c~£s report. CORRIDOR The tela~ively rapid g:ow~.~ and plarme~ ~u~,,ce dev~lo.~uqn~ in O~ange ~zi~o~s. ~ee such ~i3o~s (~caill, hs~e~m ~ Sim ~in Hills) o2 cae Trans~at~on El~fl~ o~ ~e O~e C~ ~ne~ PLan. Transportation corridors ace ds.otcce~ on CAe ~PAH map as el~ec ~ncep~- ~all~ p~o~ o: es~blish~ ali~em~s. ~e~ ~ac~l~ies a~e ~ o~ a pla~ ~ca~ic cir~la~ s~s~ n~essa~ ~ su~ de~i~nC off CAe ~ncy ~ ac~da~e wi~ C~n~y ~ C~Cy ~nd u~ p~s. ~ese 2aciliCies rill al~ :elie~ ~u~r~nC conges~l~ on ~or ar~erials and ~al ?ra~r~acion S~u~ (1980), S~ A~ T~ans~aCi~ Co~ido~ S~udy (1981), P~ill ~ans~c~a~ion Co~ridoc S~u~ (!981), a~ cae San 3~in Hills T=a~=~a=i~ Coc=i~oc S~u~ (1979). The SAN JOA~UIN HILLS TPJ~SPOI~ATION COP. R/DOR high ca~y, access~onC=olled ~=a~t=lc~on ~ac~licy ~ se=~ l~al ~e ~ ~i=h ~ludes ti=isa of ~ ~esa, Ne~== bach ~ l~ine a~ e~=e~s ~eas=e=ly a~rox~=ely 1~ miles =o Join ~e S~ Di~o Yre~ay (I-S) ~en Avery Pa~y ~d ~i~o Sec:a ~d neat ~e Clem o~ ~n Ju~ ~pis~a~ (see ~d pc~lde appcox~el~ m~i~ ol suifficien~ vid~ ~ ac~aCe [uc~ce hig~u~ vehicle (H~) lines ~d s~c~al ccansi~. 2aclll~ies ~ff r~lr~. ~ cen~ s~flC 02 ~e ~=idoc cac~ies ~ g~ea~es~ ~nc o2 ~:af21c ~ause ~ece ace a l~lc~ n~c o2 o~er ~callel hig~ 2acllicies. Tca221c ~l~s ~ ~ soa~ e~ o~ ~ ~r~i~ are 1Ms~ a~ ~e ~ou~e ~ a ~ess ~ ~ ~rrido~ vl~ ~ l~l~ ~ a~rox~Zely ~ grad~se~ac~ ~e~c~flges vi~h ar~e~a~ ~g~ays plus pr~isio~ ~or ~u~ure a~iCiona~ e~lusl~ lncec~ge re~ ~ ~e ~=ridocs c=ois subs~fl~ial c~ a~ ~e~ ~r~s. The EASTEI~ ."~AA~SPORTATI0t4 CORRIDOR is cuc=sn=ly shown as a ~ncepcual ~lignment on ~.~e ~AH. The FOOTHILL TAANSPORTATZO~ CORRIDOR is an -4- --0!5 ~ ~d ~ G~s~ ~n ~ ex~ing G~eu~erly ~ox. 13 m~es ~ · ~ ~u~e~y o~ ~ S~u ~ Fray (105) ~ ~e CLties o~ ~scin ~ ~ine. ~e ~ ~=~ac~on Co==~do= v~ originate F:fl~y (I-5) ~ hn ~mn:e in Su Di~o County. l~ ~ in:icl~Ced ~e ~scern ~c~/do: will M a La~ca~d, ~rade ~raC~ ~enic ~l~ l~!udes a~rox~Cely i~ general ~ee ~a~l l~es-a~ gene:al purple ~:a~l ~s vi~ ~l~ o~ o~e: areas vi4e en~gh ~o i~i~e ~/S~ia~ T:l~li~ r~l:mn~s l~ n~es~:~. ~cess co ~e III. COlt~DOR P~S~NNING adol~ed land use ~ of ~e Coun~ a~ Ci~ies surro~ing ~ ~r~idors. In ~e ~nt ~e Cities ~d ~ ~ently ~n~ ~eir existing ~meFal Pi~ ~d ~es, ~r~icu~rly ~ areas gerv~ ~e ~il! and pr~ will ~ ~eeval~a~ if an ~iCio~l level facili=y is ~encified =o 8er~ lflcreas~ ~o~ lend ~s. ~e Mjori~y of ~e bng~h of ~rrido= ~l~n=s ~all wi~ relatively ~de~lo~ areas of ~e County. ~e~=i~s ~ ~ls are eider e~ of ~%e San J~ Hills ~r=a=i~ ~:idors. h~ ~EridoE ~=ave=~s areas ~ hilly =erraln. A mJo~l=y of ~e areas C~n~ vi~ ~en~tiu ~:~ Hll~ Tra~tatl~ Co,ride: off ~: 28, 1979 a~ ~e nor~sterl~ ~gl~ri~ ~rk ~ ~rren~y ~e~y ~ ~e S~ J~in HiIIs cighC~f-~y r~lre~ncs. S~ de~il~ enqi~ring ~l~tion studies are ~I1 ~erway ~ ~e hs~e~n C~rtdo: ~ Just ~ O~ PatM2 ~ Xc ~s proposed ~"-ut all co~rido:s will eventually be added ~o ~he State Highway System. S~aCe legislation (AB 86) has been signed in~o law which redesc=ibes $~aCe l~ute 73 (Co=cfla Del Max F:eewsy) Co include CAe San Joaquin Hills T:armporCaCiofl Co:rider. -5- IV. ~STZM~T~ COSTS O~.Ae~ ~c, st.~ included for bo~h Corridors includes eng~ee=inq design, ~e ~r~on o~ ar~er ~aL h~ghvay highway ~s e~lud~ ~r~ ~ es~ ~ ~in~in a ~1~ ~nsis~en~ w~Ch rises and ~inal ar~erial d~l~ne ~ll~. ~lgh~f-way =~i=~ Co ~eali~ any ~n~er- ass~iom ~ha~ i~ will ~ ~ica~ in a~d~ wi~h es~bl~ahed ~z~idoz ~s~ ~as asa~d ~o ~ave a val~e o~ ~O,O00/ac~e. The cost of constructing cae Sd'H~ ~o ~be s~ndard of ~roveBenC as described in ~he previo~t section is aesed on es~imaCes prepared for $259,736,000 38,gSO,OOO 2S,g74,00Q 16tggorooo of Fee Pr:qr--), $341,660,000 FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRAnSPORtATION ~ORR/~ORS COST Foothill F, as'ce =n To,al Con,c~nge~c~es: R~ght Of Way (£n excess of S233,557,000 3S,033,000 3S,033,000 14rlS1,000 $143,S25,000 21,S28,S00 21,S28,S00 l~t~Tgoro00 $377,083,000 56,S61,S00 S6,561,S00 2S,941r000 Total (~o~ purposes of Foe pcocj=zm): S317,774,000 $198,373,000 V. OVE~Jt~L FINANCING ~il =e~r~ ~l l~icat~ i~ gene=al de.lo, nC fees ~o: ~f~ghfafe F~). ~s ~ o~e: ~re de~l~n= ~ees. ~ese o~he: ~ds ~ ~ all~a~ ~r~gh p=~esses Ln~lving cbs ~l~fornia Tra~r~t~ C~iesi~ ~e ~r=Xdor ~lmn~t~on ~oU ~ch u~ ~ at~Ub~e ~ ~ -7- 018 n~ de~nC ~h~ough ~e ~Jo~ ~or~qh~a~e ~ B~dge (~&~) san Joaqu~n Rills= $341,860,000 Cost $165,S0O,104 '48.4% SS16,147,0O0 S2S0,228,088 48.5% In acco=dance wi~h cu=:ant ~oa=d of Superviso=$' .~licy, new develo~uents within ~e ~ o~ =~e C=ans~c~Cion ~cr~dots ~11 ~ ~i~ion~ ~o tmpr~Mn~ includ~ng ~e ee=~=ed ~il~e o~ ~ ~cl~on ~ e~ess of ~o ~%e ex~enc ~a~ ~he~ ~sU ace ~!~ ~ ~e ~H pr~:~. AREA OF BE~,vEFZT Zn orde= to establish an .~TiB fee prog=am, an ~,~ee of ~enefit (AOB) ~ust be identified vi~in ~ich Eees may be =equi:e4 upon issuance of building .oec~uiCs or =eco=dation o~ final ~aps *.o defray ~he cost oE ~e ruJo= Conat=uct£on of ~he t=anspo=ta~Lon co==ldo=s will provide %eM ~acilitiee ~ ~N ~ich will ~fle~ ~m bsa ~s~Aon ~ delay off ~e It is clea~ that bo~% existing developed properties end ~fldeveloped properties ~ill benefit ~=cm construction o£ ~he t=anspo=~ation co==ido=s. mevelopuent fees a=e p~oposed ~o ~lnance a po=~lon of ~e cor=i~o=s propo=tional ~ '.he tra~f£c d~nands,.~asu=~d in ~lp ends, c~eate~ by new -8- Ii growth. The port£on of cost based upon ·xisting ~:lp ends repres'en~s The se~Solog~ used ~o date~uine ~d ASa consisted ~ de~e~in~q ~e ~luence ~e ~rcAdoc ~d ~ t~ps rode ~ln ~e C~nc~. ~e analysis m ~ucC~ vi~ a sysC~ o~ ~Cer pc~ k~ ~ ~S1 ~ci~c Or,ge Coun~ a~lca~i~ ~ a~e ~ ~ se ~e S~S2 The eodel subdivides Orange Coun~ and portions o~ ad~acant Los Angeles Coun~ int~ more ~han S00 ~r·~lc analysis sones (TAZ). The model sari- variables lUCh as po.DuLat£on, ef.~.L=yment, ~n~ and number o~ ho'~sing units. These trips ere ~hen distributed ~rom each sene ~o all o~her ZOnes b~ a well-established procedure. The uodel then dete~.uines ho~ many si 'chase person ~,ripe will tr·wl by lute, and ~ln&lly atsigns ~-hese auto t~ips om~o · h~gh~y ue~k. ~ s~l~n~c da~ us~ ~n the ~a Using the tr~.p-uaking data described above, a select 'link analysis (pro, rrna UROAD~) ~as per,or,ed ~o deter·ins ~ number o~ corridor related zone (TAZ). ~ese ~e ~ TA~ ~p e~s (acCec~a~ h~ghvays p~us ~cc~:) ~o ~pu~e ~e ~rcefl~ges The influence ·re· £or each 0£ the corridors is quite pronounced at the 4% ams greater ~-:ip ,,se level aa shcnm on the exhibits. The iMc~ern o£ omrr'idcr usage baommes erratic below the 4~ level. The deter~irdtion of ~e AOB ~or each o£ the transportation corridors was ~sed p~l~r~ly on ~e a~e ~r~do~ ~luen~ areas. H~e~r, ~oll~lng ~l~io~l cri~e~ tire used ~ su~lmn~ the ~cen~ 2South Orange County Circulation Study {BCCCS) travel de~amd £o~ecas~inq model developed by ~¢i~/Transpor~ation lalanne, rig ~lvis£on. ~ is one o£ the ~..~uter programs in UTPS. £1exible highway sesign~ent and analysis program. It is · co~prehensive 020 1. Corr£dor ~ip ende exceed !.75 krip ende per gross ac~e o~ ~e TA2. 2. ~L ~rc~= ~ip e~ ~t ~ e~ 2,000. 3. ~ip e~ gt~ wi~ e~h T~ e~ 45t. bene££~ areas. ~ch c=ea~e =ala~ ~alysis zones e~s 8% were def~n~ as Zo~ A. T~affic ~alys~s zones w~ less =~an 8% u~ ~=e aefin~ The AOB's for '~he San Jo~cl~in Hills and ~e ~ined F~ill/~s~ern' Cor=i~rs l~ludl ~ incor~ra=~ ~ ~incor~ra~ ~erri~ory and on ~ibic I. A. SAN ~OA~IN HILLS ..TRAI~SPOI~ATION CO~.q/DOR A ~ore de=a£1ed map of k.%e San Jo~quin Hills Tra~r=a=l~ Corridor ~B iS ~o~ on ~i~ i= V. ~il ~B ~n~ainf app~ox~ely ~hls ~B= aAH JOA~U~N KI?.r~e A~3B BY ~ ~P. ISDIC~ON A~ee Included in AOB Coe~ Ness 3.2 lrv~ns 22.2 L~.ne Beach $.6 qe~por~ bach 8.3 ~an CleMn~e 3.8 San ~uan ~pts~=a~ 8.2 San~a ~ 2.8 City Sub~l S4.L ~r~=ac~ Tercl~o~ 68.3 122.4 scl. miles -10- FEE EXEMPT ZONE The Fee Exempt Zone is described as be~'innin~ at the point of origin which is the intersection of the eenterllne ol' Culver Drive and the eenterline of Bonita Canyon Drive; thence northeasterly a~on~ the eenterline of said Culver Drive to Campus Drive; thence westerly alon~: the centerline of said Campus Drive to San Diego Creek; thence northerly along the centerline of said San Diego Creek to F-14 Channel; thence northeasterly along the centerline of said F-14 Channel to Old Main Street; thence southe~terly alon~ the centerline of sa~d Old Main Street to Culver Drive; thence northe~terly alon~ the centerline of said Culver Drive to ~ine Center Drive; thence northwesterly ~on~ the eenterliae of said Irvine Center ~ive to H~ Avenue; thence northe~terly alon~ t~e eenterline of said H~v~d Avenue to the eenterline of W~nut Avenue; thence southe~teriy ~on~ the eenterline of ~id W~nut Avenue to the northerly ~da~ of Tract 7073; thence e~terly ~on~ the northerly ~d~y of said Tra~t 7073 to the northerly ~undary of Tract 7040; thence e~terly ~on~ the northerly bounda~ of sai~ Tract 7040 to Intestate 5; thence sou~he~terly ~on~ ~he centeriine of said Intestate to the southwesterly co~e~ of Pl~ni~ ~ea 8; thence clockwise ~ound the bound~ of said Plannin~ ~ea 8 to Intestate 5; thence ~utherly ~on[ the een~erline of said inner,ate 5 ~o Jeffrey ~oad; ~ence ~uthwasterly ~on~ the een~erline of said Jeffre~ Road to ~vine Center Drive; ~ence ~uthe~terly ~on~ the eenterline of said l~ne Center Drive to the northe~t eo~er of Tract 9087; thence southwesterly ~on~ southerly ~und~ of said Tract 9087 to the southerly ~unda~ of Tme~ 9088; thence southwesterly ~on~ the southerly ~und~ of said Tract 9088 to the ~uther~y of Trac~ 9089; thence southwesterly ~on~ the southerly and westerly ~undaries of Said Tract 9089 to the westerly ~und~y of Tract ~902; thence ~on~ the westerly ~undar~ of said Tract 8902, and i~s p~lon~ation, to Jeffrey ~oad; thence southwesterly ~on~ the centerline of said Jeffrey Road to Unive~[ty Drive; thence southweste:l~ ~on~ cen~erline of said Unive~t~ D~ive to the e~teriy ~und~ of Plannin~ ~ea 21; clockwise around the ~undary of said Plannin~ ~ea 21 to Bonita Can~on Drive; thence westerly alon~ the een~erline 'of Bonita Canyon D~ive to i~ inte~ect~on w~b the centerHne C~lver Dr~ve and aforementioned point of ].OA 023 84, and sas ~o iU Ln~a:saction with an extensio~ o£ fi£th Avenue; Highway; ~her~e northves~ecly along ~he centerlifle o~ n£d Coast Uighvay to the crossing o£ ~ ~;L~)er e~c~ hy~ ~an~ along a l~ne ~=~eclF ~c~gh said ~ ~ Bay C= ~e ~ln~ ~ece the San~ ~-~lhi ~a~l (Yaclll~ r01) enters saAd ~F ~rC ~ ~euce 0nivers~ty D~ive co Sen~a &aa &veuue; ~hence ~or~herly a~Cmg the centerline o£ said Smn~A AmA Avenue ~o Corsets Del 14ar F=~a~ (S~te ~u~e ~3); ~e~ ~=~s~e=XF ~o~ the can~e=X~e o~ M~d Co~ofla ~e~e ~s~e~ly alo~ ~e ~fl~e~l~e ~ n~d San Dido FFHwaM Bi~. ~O ~ Bi~. ~ ~e~ e~ly a~ ~e c~ezllfle o~ ~id ~in S~ ~ ~: ~d~ ~ e~e=ly al~g ~e cefl~e=lifle c~line o~ Mid G=~ A~nue ~ ~lnge= A~e; ~e~ eas~e=17 Fc~2 (S~e ~uce 55); ~e~e ~sceclM al~ the ~nCecl~fle said N~FC~OI~ ~aa Fromm ~ Wa=neE A~nue~ ~en~ along ~e ~n~ecl~ne o~ n~d Warner A~nue ~ ~ Hill A~nue~ ~eflce ~u~s~orlM a~g ~e ~n~e~line o~ nad ~ Hill A~nue ~ A~nde; ~e~ ~=~eSCe=i~ a~ ~%e cen~ecl~e o~ hid ~on A~nae ~ ~ H~r~os~ Mesa Fc~va~ 2hen~ s~es~ecl2 alon~ ~%e cen~ecl~e o~ ~ld ~cc~s~ ~sa F~a2 ~o ~e San oi~o G~e~ly ~da~ o~ ~nc~ M~lsloa VleJo (i~r~ely at Via %l~la=)~ ~%~ Iou~sas~ecl~ al~ ~ hnc~ Mlls~ VieJo ~ndarM o~ Trac~ ~. 6381~ ~n~ ws~erly al~ ~ ~u~e~lM line o~ T~ac~ ~. 6381 ~o ~e e~e~lM ~ry a~ Parcel ~p Ho. 80-851; ~e~ ~e~12 ~ ~id easterly ~ndarM o~ Peril ~p ~o. 80-851 to ~cho Vle~o ~= ~ence ~ezl~ ~ong ~e cefl~e=line o~ said ~c~ vie Jo ~ ~ OF~a Hig~ay~ ~ e~e~IM a~ng ~e ~nte~l~e o~ Mid 0F~a RigMy ~ ~ ~ia A~nae~ ~ence axe, ion ~ ~m~l~ ~act ~. 11648~ ~ence ~erlM alo~ ~e easterly ~ary o~ said ~fl~i~ ~ ,o. 11648 ~ ~ ~dar~ of o~ said ~ ~. 8087 ~ ~e ~u~a~ of Trac~ ~. 9784~ ~hemce esata=lM ~ ~e ~r~e=lM ~ o~ nad Tza~ ~. ~784 and -11- ' 024 Caplsc~ano~ ~enoe southeasterly along said ¢i~2 external ~o~ndar~ defined ~ X~:~a~i~ ~a:iel o~ ~il 1~, 1961 a~ ~ne~Ciom ~l. 10S ~ 24 ~ de~Aon ~= Cie2 ~elol~i~ 62-11-13-2 ~fle~lt ws~ecl2 ~m~a~ ~ ~e Pac~lc ~ean; ~emce al~ sai~ alo~ ~e ~nCe=line o~ ~d ~=gue=i~e A~nue ~o San ~o~in ~ills ~ad; ~hen~ eas~erlM al~g ~e cen~e= line o~ said S~ ~in ~ad ~o S~glass Hill ~; ~e~ motherly alo~ ~e cen~erline of said S~lass ~l~ ~ ~ S~ ~lguel ~ri~ ~en~ notC~rl~ alan9 ~e cen~e~line o~ ~id San Hlguel ~ri~ ~o ~=~ ~ad~ ~heflce ~=~hesa~erly al~g ~ cen~rl~ o~ Hid Ford ~d a~ ~ ~ro~sed not.ensUe=IT ex~e~ioa ~ sh~ ~ ~e ~e C~n~ ~s~er ~n ~ial Hig~a2s aa~ Augus~ 8, 1984, ~o ~i~ Cafl~ ~ ~hence eas~erlM along ~%e cen~er l~e o~ uId ~ni~ CanOn ~a ~o CAe ~s~er ~ o~ ~er~al Hlghva2s~ ~en~ eaa~erlM alo~ ~e cem~e~l~e o~ ~%e pro~s~ ex~o~i~ of Sa~ C~n A~nge ~ ~ ves~erl7 High~s; ~hen~ eas~erZy al~ ~ ~n~erl~fle o~ ~e pro~sed ex~nsion o~ ~id h~e ~a=~a~ ~o ~g~a Canon ~d; ~en~ ~CAer~ aZo~ ~e cen~erl~fle of sa~d ~g~ C~ hd ~ ~e pro~se~ westerly ex~eflsion o~ ~fl~ ~=la Avenue ~ 8h~ ~ ~i~ ~s~e~ Plan of ~er~l H~gh~ya~ ~e~e easterly a~ ~e ~n~er~n~ o~ ~e ~ Par~y~ ~en~ ~er~y a~ ~ cen~e=~ o~ sam ParM~ ~o ~ ~ro ~, ~en~ nor~esa~ecl~ alo~ ~e cen~ecl~e cen~e~lLne o~ Sai~ Psa~ de Valencia ~ i~ esa~e=lM pFoloflga~oa lfl~ers~ ~n~ezs~ce S ~i~ ia a~ ~ eascerl~ ~dar~ o~ ~e ~o~1 area off ~neffl~ ~e~ ~ecly ~o~ ~id eas~erlM o~ ~ ~ a~sa o8 ~ne~l~ ~a~ ~o ~re l~ again lfl~e~sec~s al~ ~ ~m~e~li~ o~ sai~ Xm~e~s~e S ~o San ~ C~eek ~ad~ ~e~ ~s~e=12 alo~ ~e ~n~erl~e o~ ~ld ~ ~uan Cr~k ~ad C~A~ Capis~ ~n~ ~=~cl2 al~ ~e cen~erl~e o~ ~ecly alo~ ~e ~n~e~l~e off Mid ~l~z S~ ~ ~l~ Avim~ ~ ~scecl2 ~ ~ ~n~ecli~ o~ lam ~i~ ~1 Avian ~ceclal High~, ~ Cc~ Va~ey P~My~ ~e~ s~e~lM alo~ ~e ~nterlifle o~ ~id Cr~ Vall~ ~ar~2 ~ ~rch ~M Doit; ~ence ~ste=l~ al~ ~r~ ~ Ori~ a~ ~ soucA~sterl~ pr~aCion ~o ~e Pacl~i~ ~. -12- 025 Z~ne B Some B As ,~excrlMed I~ ~be ~o~al Si~ ~'~s.~ln SilLs excluding ~one A as deacz~.bed above. area of' benefi~ single area of benefit vas ~ele~d for ~ ombined Foo~llX ~d ~re de~il~ ~p o~ ~ ~l~ecn ~::idocs ~ ~s sh~ on ~lbi~ ~. ~ls ~ ~n~inl approxlM~ely 291 ~ace miles. ~1 o~ ~'OO'I~Z,T,,~/~J~2'~ ~OB BY ~ 3~DI~TSDZC/'ZOH Area lnclude~ in A,~aheim 14.1 l:vine 18.9 OraAge 10.6 San Clemen~e 13.5 San 3Ban Capistrano S.0 SAn~i AAa 2.8 Tuatin il.1 Villa Park 2.1 Yurts ~i~da 17.7 City Subtotal 95.8 ~nincorpora~ed Territory 194.7 sq. miles 290.S aG. miles The AOR'la bounde~ venerally by ~be northerly boundary of t~e San 3oaquin Sills Transportation Corridor ADB fr~a the San Dingo County Line ~o ~he inCeraecr, ior~ of the ~an Die~o ~.eTeevay ($~aCa Mute-lOS) and ~.he Sev~)or~-CosU ~n Fc~M (S~te ~te SS); ~ence ~en~ mu~eas~e~ly a~ng ~n~erl~e o~ Mid ~ A~nue ~o ~ Hill AUnt; ~e~ ~u~e:ly ~g ~ ~nterX~ne o~ Bid bd Sill A~nue ~ Wa:ne~ A~mue~ ~e~e ~g~sta:12 al~ ~e ~mtegline said W~meg A~nue ~o S~ ~u~ S57 ~n~ ~F~an~a:ly al~q ~e ~m~e:ll~ o~ Mid SUre ~u~e SS to ~ingeE A~nue~ ~e~ al~g ~ ~n~e:lt~ o~ Bid MAnger A~n~ M ~ Aunue~ ~ence S~=~ ~en~ ean~erl2 ~ ~ ~nte=line o~ ~id ~n~eenth mid SU~e ~ute SS ~ ~e ~rside ~ay (Sure ~u 01)~ ~ence ~r~s~e~12 ~ ~e ~n~etl~e ~ mad SUre ~e 0X ~ o~ n~d c~ ~ ~lnK ~ ~m~Aon ~s. 6~-~, 76-1, -13- 65-4, S3-.3, 64-i, 65-';', 63-4, 63-2, 64-4, amd 72-2 vita Tm~e;i&l Wighvay~ tAencm oou'cheaste~ly along ~e cence~line o~ Sai4 va~ey vier Avenue aid ~ O~ge Coun~ line ~ ~ ~a~ Zone A begins at. ~he Orange/San Bermatdino ~nCy line ~fle~e said Highways ~a~ Au~us~ 8, 1984~ ~en~ ~s~ezZ2 along sa~ pr~se~ ~ Pa~ Avenue ~ ~e C~on ~ as s~ ~n sa~d ~scec P~ o~ ~e~al High~ys~ ~ence sou~e:l~ along ~e cence:line o~ n~d pr~d ~e ~verside F:eeva~ (S~e ~u~ 91); ~en~ vesce~ a~g ~e ceflce~line o~ said S~ce ~uCe ~1 ~o ~e ~e eascecl~ ~ o~ the Walla~ ~ ~ s~ ~ Orange Coun~M ~d off Sa:~y 2-5~ ~eflce ~u~e~Ce~l~ alo~ ~e easterly ~a~ o~ t~ WIi~ ~ ~ ~ntinuing sou~e~terl~ along ~i~ easte~12 ~dary ~ ~e ~c~eaaterl~ ~cner o~ ~e Oa~ Hi~s ~ as S~ lm said ~d *~ S~rvey 2-5~ ~ence sou~eas~e~lM along ~e eas~e~lM ~ o~ Su~eM 2-5 ~o ~e pr~s~ ~ezl2 ex~ensi~ al~ sai~ Wel~ C~M~ ~ ~ X~vime ~uleva~ ~e ~n~ezline ~ hid ~fv~fle ~lev~d ~ ~ ~a Avenue; ~ence pzo~s~ ~eali~en~ ~f T~ ~d ~ ~ezial Hiq~a~s~ ~en~ eao~erl2 alo~ ~ cen~efli~ o~ said p~o~s~ ~eali~efl~ of said T~ ~ ex~ensi~ of ~i~lands ~uleve~d~ ~en~ al~ said ~ui~l~ds ~l~a~d ~o ~e ~n~e~line o~ ~ A~nue~ ~eflce ~ ~n~e~li~ o~ said ~ A~n~ ~ ~e~ ~d~ ~enue eas~e~l~ al~g ~e ~n~e~li~ o~ Mid Jer~ ~d ~ ~e Par~2~ ~ence ~e~l~ along ~ cefl~e~li~ o~ said h~e ~em~ esa~ezl2 ~o~ ~e ~a~e~line o~ hid ~ ~d ~o ~cia ~ ~r~la Pa~yJ ~efl~ easterly al~ ~e ~u~eeline o~ Mid ~r~h P~M ~ ~ pr~ ~t~o P~My ~ s~ ~ said ~u~s~e~ly al~ ~e ~ateeline ~ nad O~a Highs2 ~o ~e Plan of ~e~ial Hig~Ms~ ~e~ ~s~e~ly said p~a~ ex~e~i~ ~ A~ ~a~dy -14- -- 027 VXrX. ASS botndary to the Orange/San Diego County line; tAence aLoog the Orange County line to where it: lntarsecta the the proposed Id paisa Avenue as shown on said Plamt:e~ Plan llighuays. excluding Zone A as described above. A, lMt:erminat:ion og Fee Progcan's Share o£ Corridor Cos~ The gi=st step in calculating CAe gee program ·hare o£ the cor.-idor cost: was to determine the percentage si corridor user t:cip ends th·~. ~rig£nice sc end vithin ~he area o£ bene£1t: ~aiab are attributable co new gro~h. Trip inforuat:lon derived £ro. ~he ~CCS truvel demand the developer· share and nult:iplied by the to~al corridor cost t:o der:ermine t:he gee program s~are o£ coe~.t aa ·ho~n in Table VXZZ-I. The gee Program share o~ corridor cost: Wa· then ·sparer:ed into amount:s repraeent:ing direct: and indirec~ bene£1ta to t:he bene£ic zones (A & ~ .Zones) be·md ~POn pea~ ho~r and nos-peak hour t:ravel chacact:ecis~ics. Ale, foxiest:ely six'~y-one percent1 (61%1 o£ corridor t:rips ace expect:ed ,to occur during nofl-pea~ travel hours, taus representing a measure o~ tAe direct: benegit: £r~m tAe corridors. Approximately thicty-n£ne percent:1 (3~) o£ corridor trips ars expect:ed ~o occur durin~ pea~ hours o£ t:ravel~ taus repreeen~ing laanened congest:ion on the remaining t:rann.--~rt:ation system. This syscom relie£ ia de£ined as iodirec~ benefit:. bene£1ta he,Mean ~he A and B scoeL Tbs port:ion o~ ~as p~ogram share rep~eamnt:lng direct: beflelit: ~ divided bet,~en the A and · zones based upon tAe percentage o£ corridor uamr t:=ipe due to grov*.~ within each zone. The port:ion o~ developers share repreBonhing indi:ec~ benegit: was dis~lb~t:ed betnean the A and a zones based upon the percentage o~ total t:rip ends on the ~ranaporta~ion 8yst:am within an¢~ zoM. The gees got ~e A and B ~coes, there£oce, ioclede a measure og both direct: and lndtmect: bene£1~s received by each BOM. w'thioit:s Pll and Vl~ show the method in ,~xi~ these cal~ulat:£ons were made. l~alt:rans, IAi~S 1976 U~ben Rural Survey. -LS- Costs ($) Shaze (~} Share S0'HT~ Zone ~-one 28.61 $ 9?,856,??5 19.81 $ 67~643r330 $341,660,000 48.41 Zone A 25.8% $133,096,091 Zone B Total $316,147,000 48.$% S250,228,066 o~ deve~n~. ~a~on o~ ~e ~8~ ~ ~e ~s~s o~ ~ip end coat ap?ortioned to ffuture development iA ~he AOB zone coa~/~:lp end tcip end gcov~.h in ~he AOB zone S97~8S6r775 1,321,160 · $?4/TB $I33~096~091 1,665,922 Zone B $67r$43~330 1,462,093 ' S46/T~ $117~131r975 $43/T~ 2,730,731 u ThO dace used iA c,,,~,d~iflg ~he average cott pez trip end are su--aacized iA '-od~ibiC ~X ~ X. ~e Ccip e~ venecaCAon flavors amd sh~ ~ ~biC ~. ~e p~o~ gr~ ~ ~ng ~s vas ~ken s~ ~ ge~ra~ ~ ~ ~X4 ~l~n~ adopted b~ ~%e Ozange Co~nt-y Tran~o~ation Cc~uuise£on. 029 Various land uses el~i~ ~he arms o£ bena£1~ have Men groupe~ ~o ~p ~ne=a~ton ra~as ~d ~ ~u~m ~e ~p e~ ~ each o~ ~-=as~den~ ~ ~s, ~ ~s~n~ vas ~de ~ ~ pro~ec~ ~e=ci~ ~velo~n~. ~ig~=~/c~A~M c~rcial aze ac~m~ ~o~ ~,~ase ~z~ ~ips a~ivi~ ~r~ e~ ~e~ni~ co zesidemcas. ~e~ residefl~l-rela~ ~p e~s ac~ p~ide savi~s ~ ~ra~l ~a~o d~ ~ ~e shoz~ ~ure o~ ~e ~ip. ~e eme~ ~as~ion ~ ~ra~ic ~c~s. The reassigned ~rip ends wre ~pli~ between single family and multi- uni~ residential land u~ee baaed upon ~heir =aspec~ive ~rip ends due ~.o grove. The adjust, nd ~:lp ends a~e as follows= ~ VXXZ-2 ~ ~OB ~Z~ ~S Zone A Zone B Generated Adjusted ~ene=a~e~ Ad~us~e~ Trip Ends Trip Ends Trip Ends Trip ~ds lax ~ZH IrVTA,S TRAHSPORTATZQtl CORAZ~OR Single ~amlly Basidential ~nita 379,452 leulci-~i~ J~eaiden~ial ~nl~s 193,856 Be ighho ~hood/~m~ '~ icy ~a'uefc:La'1 448,800 559,535 139,368 254,g36 285,053 240,923 440,312 179rS20 525,262 210,105 FCX:Y~Z~ T~AHSPOR~ATZOIICOI~.3~ORS Single Faully a~s~encial ~s 666,024 ~lCi-aui~ ~sidsntial ~i~s 160,377 Neigh~=hc*~/C~.~lt2 ~rcial 499,662 897,860 643,812 1,143,880 216,238 248,906 442,221 191,865 1,155,638 462,255 -17- 030 $iflgle Fauily Mul~l-~nA~ SAN 30A~IIN KIL~S TRARSPORTATZON ~ORR~)OR Zone A $41,264,990 $21,093,922 $36,497,862 Zone B $11,727,066 $20,254,362 $35,661,922 97,856,774 67,643,330 Zone A $71,836,800 $17,299,040 $43,960;261 Zone B $49,186,840 $19,0~$,$03 $¢8,929o63~ $133,096,091 $1!7,L31,975 ~s de~e~n~ ~ dividing ea~ s~:m ~ ~he appropriate n~t o~ TABL~ VIII-4 Rounde~ SAN JOA~JZN HZLL~ T~ANSPOItTATICH COBR~'DOR ~-~eeiden~lal S41,264,990 * 31,621 units S21,093,922 . 27,?08 un~=e $35,497,862 * 20,02~,186 s~ $1,30S/unt~ $1,30S/un~: S761/unit $?6o/uni= $1.?7/ef Single-~anily ~esiden~ial Mul~l-onl~ ~eeiden~£al ~cn-~esi~efl~ial $11,727,066 · 11,614 $20,264,362 ~ 34,389 $35,661,022 · 2?,?OO,SS9 $1,OlO/uni~ $1,OlO/uni= S$89/uni~ $Sg0/un~= Sl.20/s~ $1.30/s~ -18- 031 L land U~e Calcul&t ion ~ounded ~,neA Slngle-£a~lly raaidan~la~ Non-residential $71,836,800 v 5S,502 units $17,2~9,040 t 22,gll units $43~960f251 . 24~231~67 a£ $TS5/uni~ $1.8~/s£ $1.80/s~ Singleo!mnlly residential X~l~l-~n~ residential $4g,196,840 ~ S3,S51 unica Sgl?/unl~ $19,015,S03 t 35,558 unica $S35/~mi~ $48,929,632 t 46,6~6,669 £lae $1.OS/sf $S3~/~nit Sl. OS/s~ ~usmn~s will mo~ ~ Mde ~ ~a~ic ~atiom ~a~es ~ ~eflec~ a~lies due ~ p~o~ design az o~e~ ~di~l~s. ~1 ~ utes will M de~u~ ~ ~ ~i~in ~e ~s~ ~p~ia~e o~ ~e ~%~ee general h~ ~n caboodles. event an existing non-residential building ia pro~oaed ~o Me ex~, the Zee ~i~ ~ ~e~emlfl~ ~ ~ ne~ ~em o~ building ~es~den~ial ~e wi~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~lld~ area, ~ ~Hs shall -19- 032 ~.xa~lee ofl ~ee calculations: The flee ~o: a development consieting of 100 eingle-~a~ily ~ecaohed units, 300 condo un£~s and 25,000 s.~. o~ o~fi~ ~ Neig~h~ Shopp~g Cen~e~ u~s ~u~ ~: San Joac~l.£n Hil~s :ASH (100 D.U. X S13O$/~.U.) (300 D.U. x STSQ/~.U.) (2S,0OO S.F. x $1.75/S.F.) · $ 130,SOQ - $ 228,000 - S 43,750 ·otal flee flor ~evelo~ment Afl loca=e~ in Zone A o~ ~ ASH Foothill/East.tn ASH tZona · $ 402,250 " $ 92,00Q - $ 160,SO0 - $ 26r250 15,000 ..fl. Neighborhood Shopping Cen~ec would ~ calculaCe~ as follotm: San 3oa~uin Hills A0B (~ome B)t {5,000 e.f. x S1.30/a.~.) · '$ 6,500 Tot. al flee floc develolmenC if located in ~one A of S,;B'I'C AOB - -20- 0 3! ,~pothl~l/bmtmrn ~0~ (~ons ~): (S,O00 s.£. x 9,000 T~tal £ec ~or development Il located ~ne A o£ FooChllX/F~stern ACe projects cr pro~ecCs uhich include Sta~e or Federal requirenen~s to provide units a££ordable co £amilies vi~h incomes lees than 80% 0£ the ..dian ~mcome (Section VXX'X housing). Tbe de£erral may be £or a per£od o~ m ~i~ ~KS ~:~ the issuance o£ building pe~aits or the period o£ the S~ate/?eder&l-~unding requirements beqinninq upon issuance o~ ch. ~trst building permit. The £ees to be paid shell be those in e£~ec~ at the tam o~ paMment and shall ~e secured by an agreeeeat and renevable letter o£ credit held b~ an ancrov toe,many, Qr cash or time cert££icate o£ deposit in the amount o£ 2ess plus 1S percent in anticipation o2 ~n2lstionary increases. FOR COLL~I'XOW ~f ~* ~e ensbling ordinance pro~ides ~or collection o£ £ees as a conditiom of 2imal sap approval or issuance o£ building por~l~. Fees shall be collected prio= to issuance o2 all building pem£ts ~or ~ev ree~dential eS. rue'cures and co~ercia!/imdustrial structures ~hich establish new an~ enlarged ~loor space. Fees ~lll not be required ~or remodeling or ~ec~astructinq exiatin~ structures co the ~ number of residen~ial dvelling u~l~s or equal ccoaercial building area. Fees yell no~ be required £or co~ntruction o2 retaining yells, patio covers, swimming pools ~r o~.~sr m~ inhabitable ~esiden~ial s~uc~urea. XX. DL'V~SLO~ ~S & C~D~TS 1. ~edicate right-o£-vey in accordance with leheaatic plans approved by Grade norrlAor riqht-o£-vay in eccordence vi~h arb.lactic plans approved by ~hs 3oint PouersAgenc~ and shorn on the Ten~ative Tract Hap and rough gradiAg plans. overcrceeing structure (i.e., nceb~r o£ travel l&nes) is ~ ~ 4. Conotruct corridor ~raval Lanes and lnterchanqe r~s required -21- 034 (cLosura o£ short gaps). Htnber o£ lanes required is to be ~sed upon generated by pro~d pro~ec~. ~eve~nc o~ ~e ~H p~m. ~eneu~ su~lv~s~o~ a~e ~d~on~ ~o ceco~a~i~ of ~i~l ~:ac~ oe ~I n~ ~o iden~l~y ~ di~fe~en~ ~fl ag~mn~s v~ es~b~sh ~e ~un~ o[ re.urine go~ ~ch a ~e~lo~ u~ ~e~in~sh c~l~s ~ lieu o~ ~yLng flees ~t~l cr~s ~ssuan~ o~ bGil~iA~ Zn ~he event a development not requi.'iAg subdivision is ~ndltione~ to Coms~C~ o~ g:ade ~F~ions o~ ~e ~z~s~a~ion ~z:~do~s o~ d~i:a~e righc~-~y, re~u~n~ agr~n~s ~all ~ ex~c~ pr~o~ ~o ~ssuance o~ ~Y ~uild~ng ~:mi~ v~n ~e proj~C ~u~aries. ~evslopers will be allc~ed ~ apply credits earned on one p~o~ec~ ~o ano~he~ p~oJ~ wi~in ~e sm a~ee o~ ~ne~L~ ~ ~ ~e s~e de~l~. In ~e even~ ~i~le ~ ~e h~ o~ a pFo~ cha~es~ ~en ~ci~ication Co ~e ~ppr~c~a~e ~isla~i~ ~ ~ac i8 a ~r~y ~ ~e re~rs~enC agr~n~. Cr~l~ vi~ o~ecvise ~ non ~ams~e~able ~ one ~el~ ~ anodes. C~i~a ~ ~ ~e~ ~o~ ~r~ae o~ r~uciflg ~s prio~ ~ ~le~i~ a~ accept~ o~ qradiAg, ~ro~n~s o= ~lqh~-~ d~ica~on. HM~f; no ~e~-~men~s shall accep~ ~ ~e ~afd o~ ~l~rs o~ ~l~y ~cil and The guidel~nes ~or deCerainetion o~ ~ee credits are as £olloes: Credi~ £or =ight-o£-~a¥ de~lca~ioa, gradiAg, and o~.her imprcvemen~s will oflly be given ~o ~he ex~en~ ~ha~ ~be coa~ o~ such righ~-o~-wa? or improvemeats are included in ~he c&lcula~ion o~ ~ees iA ~.%e ,~mjor Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program. ][ -22- 035 Cr®dit will be qiven for riqht-o~-~ay dedica~io~ At ~he .~ate o~ $50,000 ~r ~cre e~pt ~or ~ re~r~ 3. GrAding Credit will be given ~or earthwork, road a~d alc~e drainage, buttreasir~, atablliastion, h~droaeedinq an~ eroaic~ c~ntrol At the foll~ing ~ined rates: Corridor gec~ent Credit Rate Ja~a~oree =c Station all*SO Station $11+S0 to Moul~n Par~way M~ulton Par~way to P&aao de Colinal $149,784 ~er ac~e road easamemt $124,132 l~er Acre road easement $124,915 per ac~e mad easement Fcothill/~astern Corridor righ~.-o£-way (hinge ~n~ ~o h~n~ ~fl~) e~ s~ ~ drainage 4. Drainage Structures Credit will be given for drainage structures in accordance with lengths of pipe Amd unit prl~es estimated as ~oa~s in the fee program dete~uine are reaaonable equivalanta cf ~he a~ucturea in the fee ~roqram cost estimate. U~it prices for ak-built drain&qe a~ructures will be thole used in the latest fee program coat estimate. Enqimeerin~ and admimiatration c~edit o~ 15% of the drainaqe atructure credit will be Added. Contingency credit o~ 10% cf the structure cradi2 will be Added. Terrace drains, do~mdrains tam~rar2 drainage facilities or erosion control facilities are included in ~he average unit cos~ of grading. Credit will be given ~or ~cher l~q~ve~enCa at the rate at which ~he hapr~vament was eati~ated in the fee program plus 15% for enqineerinV and a~ainiatrati~ plus 10~ for contir~encios. The credit rates specified above will be revised whenever the corridor cnat estimates are reviaed for the ~urpoae c~ adJustir~ ~oaa. O~ce -23- 036 ~u~=viso=a ~d City ~c~18 ~or ~ees to ~ aut~atica~ly adJuat~ bes~ ~n ~ ~ ~t~ucti~ ~at i~x. O~at~ p~o~t ~at estimates, aubat~cia~ cA.gee in gene=~ pl~ la~ use e~en~, or other ~rtinent ~o~aC~on ~y ~so ~ cause ~o= adjacent by ~e h:d o~ SucceSsors and Ci~ Co~c~s. In the event an annual e~aluation of the fe~ programs causes fees to be rsduce~ fo: any reasons, =eim~u=sements will mot ~e considered ~or fees already ~aid. There are twmlve different cities within the prop~se~ a~eas of benefit for the ?~thill/~astern and San Joslin HAils Join= Pours Agenci~ (~A) ~is=i~ ~ Ci~ ~ C~n:y ~s ~e pro~s~ ~ the pu~ses o~ planning ~ .~pl~en:in~ =he San J~in ~i!ls, F~=hill a~ Eastern Tra~rtati~n Co=ri~rs. It separate ~A's ~ c=eat~ ~o= the gan ~in Ri~n Corridor and the ~in~ r~ill~as~ern Corri~rs. ~,es ~ll~t~ ~ C~es and the County wi~ ~ 4e~si:~ with eac~ ~A fo~ ~he ~aes ~f ~eai~ning amd ~::u~i~ :As ~idoFs. ~he ~A will ~ ~es~ible for ~inis:e~i~ fha collec:~ u~ez this f~ pF~F~ iflclu4lm~ ~Y re~urs~en~s *alled 7/19185 I .I AREA OIr REREFIT N)EX UAP IITH CITY BOUIqDAI~S SAN .IOAQUlN HILLS FOOTfllLL/EAST£1m TRAI~ISPORTATI01ql COllRI)4XI 039 1 6 7 8 9 10 14 21 .°26 ~ 28 ~SOLUTION OF T~ BOA~ OF SUP~RVZSORS OF * Apr~l 21, 1982 On mo~ton o~ Supe~iso~ Wleder, dul~ seconded and carried, folkwang Resolution ~as adopted: b~S, deve~o~en~ o~ ~ands ~s occurring vh~ch contributes d~rec~ ~o ~e need for ~ranspor~a~on corr~dors~ and ~e ~ranspor~a~o~ corr~dors; and ~S, deve~oFmen~ bentf~n9 from ~p~en~a~on o~ ~ranspor~a~on corridors should contribute ~o~ard ~he cos~ ~n proportion ~o ~e need generated; and WHE~S. r~gh~-of-way for the ~rans~=~a~ion should be pro~ected as developmen: occurs; and WHEK~S, grading should be acc~plisbed, whenever ~ssible, conjunction w~:h the grading and develo~en: of surrounding proper:y: and ~S. impl~en:at~on of logical incremen:s of :he should 'occu: in conjunction wi:h :he land development process :be transit=at,on needs of tha: developMnt require those for access~ and ~S, development policies for the im~l~entation of the :ranspor:a:ion corridor will p:ovide m ~sis for planning of future developmen: and serve as no=~ce ~o ~he p~lic as ~o the future locations of the corridors~ Resolutfon No. 82-598 Transportation Corridors Development Policy -26- 040 1 2 4 7 I0 11 I? 20 2! 22 2~ 24 27 :;OW, ;'H; ,,,O~E, BE ~T ;~:OLVED that as & condition of ~p~tuval of subdivisions containing within their boundaries portions of transports=ion corridors shown on the Transportation Element of the County General Plan the developer shall: 1. Dedicate right-of-way to County. 2. ~rade corridor right-of-way in accordance with schematic plans approved on the tentative map and rough grading plans approved by =he Director, F-MA. 3. Construct arterial overcrossings for internal.arterials. Width of overcrossing structure (i.e., number of travel lanes) is to be determined based upon vehicular and pedestrian traffic generated by the proposed project. 4. Construct corridor travel lanes an~ interchange ramps required immediately for access to proposed development or system continuity (closure of short gaps). Number of lanes required is to be based upon traffic generated by proposed project. 5. Participate, among other designated beneficiaries, in any established corridor development fee program. Costs incurred pursuan:~ to. Conditions 2 through 4 shall be creditable against fees. Cos=s incurred pursuant to Condition 1 shall be creditable against fees to the extent that the developT~n= fee pro~=am includes said righz-of-way cost. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that F. MA is here~y directed to amend appropriate sections of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes to impleme:: this policy. BE IT FURTMER RESOLVED that EMA is hereby directed to incorpors" in General Plan amendment elements, zoning actions, area plans and site plans recommendations appropriate for implementing this policy. -27- 041 ? $ 9 11 i.~ 14 ': I? 18 19 ~ 26 :~ iT =~'~ k~$OLV~D th&t EFA is hereby directe~ to begin analyzing ;,ctential areas of benefit os an a~jun¢= to the Orange County/ Orange County Transportation Commission Transportation Finance similar policies. BE IT FURTHER R~SOLV~D that ~A is hereby ~irecte~ %o procee~ a~pe~i=iously with the establishment Of a fee .~PERV I SORS HA-~.RI-rTT M. WIEDER, RALPH B. CLA~K, AND ROGER R. NO£S: SUPE~I SOPS A~SE,~T: SUPERVISORS BRUCE ,%~STA~DE AND THOMAS F., RILEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA I COUNTY OF OR~NG£ ) Ca:ifornia I, JUNE ALEXANDER, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, . hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly ~r~..~l~!y aUoo.e¢ by the said Board at a regular meeting t~ereof held on the lg 82 , and passed by a urat~Lm:~m wte of satd -28- LEGEND ~ ), Io.o AREA OF *INFLUENCE FOR CORRIDOR USER8 (BASED OIi PEACENTAGE OF U~EI! TRFS) 8AN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR EXHIBIT III LESENO Bm · ~O.e AREA OF INFLUENCE FOR CORRIDOR USERS (m~ASED ON PERCENTAGE OF USER TRIPS) FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR EXHIBIT -,Io- IV LEG[NO AREA OF BENEFIT SAN JOAGUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION COflRII)OR '.% LEGEND AREA (Xr BENEFIT FOOTHILL/EASTERN TIIANSPQRTATIQ# CO~S -- 047 MTBZT Page X o£ 2 wi~.h O~e o,' ~o'ch grids %n ~o~e Trips beg~ming lnd ending tn zone (~Tipl dba to grov~) Our/In ~ripm (Trips due ~o (Total ~one A ~one B 27,109 5*890 g,116 29,047 9,811 ' 22,195 60,148 28,834 49,798 78,820 35,345 69,894 S7,362 28,141 S0,274 73,274 38,582 72,203 T=tp En~ Aflalysis (Trip ends due to gcov~) 171,725 65,758 Z18,304 C?o~.nl ~ip s~a) 210,188 93,849 186,487 (~rcent ~dor ~ ~um ~ g~)1 81.701 70.29% 63.44% CPe:cen~ ~:tdo: ~e=s ~ ~ ~ne)2 42.88% 19.081 38.04~ (Pe~en~ ~rzt~ m:s ~ ~ue ~ graph)3 38.Q3~ 13.411 24.~3t DT20-19 -33- ~XIIIIIIT Vii Page 2 o~ 2 FEB PA0~RH4 SII4RB aP TOTAL ~ORRIOOR 3/~1 30A~DIN Illf-l-q TRAHSiq)DTATIOGI C~HRIOOR Oxr idor Users Due to Growth Direct ;ndlrect. Fee Program Benefit BenD;It Share Gro~Lh in ?rip en~a rea 35.03% $ 7],006,934 $ 24,O49,84t L3.iil $ 27,940,130 $ 39,695,200 48.44% $100,955,0&4 $ 64,545,04! $ 97,Be&,7?5 $ $165,500,105 1,4&2,093 2,70],253 $46/TE 0Sg/TB (Ave.) 1. Total ~orrldor Cost - $]41,660,000 2. Fee Program chafe - 48.441 x $]41,660,000 - S]65,S00,105 ]. Direct Benefit &il x $165,500,105 - $]00,955,064 4. Zndirect Benefit 391 x $~65,S00,105 - $64,54S,Q41 5. Zofle A hre Direct Benegit 35.03t x $]iL,SS0,QO0 x 611 - [tbciire~t bMfit 31.SIi x $&4,545,04] - Subtota! &. Zone B Direct Benefit Indirect Benefit 1].41% x $341,660,000 6i.51' x $&4,545,04! = Subtotal Total tee Program Share 73;006,9]4 97,85&,77S 27,948,130 39f695f200 67,643,330 $L65,500,105 · 1 To~a! aya~em trip ends within A & e zones .) 049 Co~=ldor User T~?s ~h One or Bo~.h Ends Zn Zone T=:Lps bec~nfl2ng and end:~nq fm zone (T=~p8 clue '.o Out/In T:ips (T~ps due ~o growl, h) Zone A Zone 3 Ou~l~de 27,922 9.,322 20,555 28,200 11,657 37,307 68,629 31,320 64,217 80,763 46,004 88,512 75,449 33,648 55,069 89,823 45,760 79,6~6 ends due ~.~ ggowt, h) 189,922 83,612 160,396 (~l tgip e~) 226,986 1Z5,078 242,822 (~r~n~ ~==ldo= ~ d~ ~o gcc. h)$ 88.09~ 72.66~ 66.05t (~rcen~ ~:=~dor ~ers ~ b~ ~ne)2 38,8Zt ~9.68t 41.52t . (Percen~ ~r~ido~ ~e=s ~ due ~ g~)3 34.18q 14.30~ 2~.42~ Ll~=cen~ ~o~:~dor TS due to g=ow~h - ~r~ ends due ~o ~row~h ~on o~ ~aZ ~ip e~s ~=cen~ ~==ido~ mrs B b~ zone D'~20-19 -35- EXIIIBIT vii( Pa~je 2 of 2 FEB PRQGRAH SIIAI~ OF TOTAL C~#iIfDOR COST Corridor Uoern Due to Growth Benefit Benefit Sha,e Trip efldu JPee A 34.111 ~107,6LS,tl7 $ 25,480,474 $133,096,091 a 14.301 $ 45.023.903 $ 72.108,472 $117,131,975 To,a! 48.48i $I5206)9,120 $ 9?,588,946 $250,228,0&6 1,6&5,922 4,196,653 $80/T~ $S7/TR (Ave.) 1. Total Corridor ~t · $516~147,000 2. fee Program abate - 48.481 x $516,147,000 - $250,238,0&6 3. Direct Benefit &il x $250,229,06& - $152,639,120 4. Indirect Belmrit 391 u $250,228,0S& = $97,5880946 5. Dlre~t Benefit Indirect Benefit Indirect Benefit 34.111 x $51&0147,000 x 61i = 2&.i11* x $97,588°946 - Subtotal 14.]01 x $516,147,000 x 6ll 7].891* x $97,588094& - Subtotal ·otal Fee Program Share '1 ~)tm! 8yntem trip ends within & E B Zoneu $107.615.61~ ~ 25f48Of474 45,023,50] 72fiOSt472 $117,1]1og75 $250,228,066 Projected Growth In Dvellin~ Un'its 81ngle Dwolliug Units (SOU) ~ultlple Duelling Units (mX)) Projected Growth In Industrial/Commercial Floor aanufa~turln9 Floor Spe~e (Sq. Ft.) Retail-Regional Floor Spans (Sq. ft.) Retail-Lo.al* Floor Spa~e (Sq. ft.) Office/Other Floor Spa~e (Sq. Ft.) Total floor Bpa~e (Sq. Ft.) Trip Bud Growth By Landuee Trip Rate Factors SUU (i2 ?.L/D.U.! HOU (7 T.B./D.U.) Hanufa~turing (10 T.B./knf) Retail-Regions! (50 T.B./kof) Ret&ll-Lo~nl* (]00 T.B./kif) Oefl~e/Other (20 T.l./knf) YotaX Trip Bnda Hew Devel~ment Ohere o1~ Total ~orrldor Costa Average Coat per Trip End Coat in 1984 Dollars Zone A ]1,621 27,708 5,659,168 1,496,000 4,488,000 0,378,017 20,021,185 379,452 193,956 56,592 74,800 448,900 167,560 1,321,16Q $ 97,856,779 $ 74(L) JSame an neighborho~l/ooemunlty ~Xxemercial (1! $97,856,775 t 1,]21,160 TE - $74.07/Trip End! say $74/Trip End (2) $67,643,330 t 1,462,093 TS - $46.26/Trip Ends nay $46/Trip End 11,614 34,369 6,701,072 5,826,375 5,252,625 9,920,487 27,700,559 139,]68 240,723 67,011 291,319 525,262 198,410 1,462,093 $ 67,641,]30 $ 46(2! n720-21 EXII[BI? X COST PER TRIP ~Jll) AHALYSIS I~(X)'I'I I I L[,,/Ug?RRtl Projected Growth In Duelling Onit~ SinvlelMelllfl~Onits (SO(J) #uitipieUueliiegUnits Floor Trip Bnd Grovth B~ Laflduse Trip Rate Factors ~flu (12 T.E./D.U,) aDO (7 T.B./D.U.) ~nuf~turi~9 (10 T.K./ks~) RetaiL-Regional (50 T.I./kef) office/Other (20 Trip Snds New Devel~r~mnt Share of Total Corridor Coats Average Cost per Trip End Coot in 1982 Doll&to ~one A 55,502 22,9LL 7,680,998 4,796,625 X0,155~26~ 24o23L,767 666,024 ~60,377 76,810 79,944 479,662 203,105 1,665,922 $133,096009L ~one S 53,651 13,4390465 3,652~125 11,556~375 ~7,~68~704 46,616,669 248,906 192,606 355,374 2,730~731 $117,131,975 $ 80(})' $ 43(2) *Same aa neighborhood/community oomueraiaL (Il $~33,096,091 f 1°665,922 = $79.89/T[lp ~nd! say $80/Tr[p (2) SLLT,L]i,975 f 2,7]O,73L = ~42.89/Trip ~nd{ 8~y $43/Trip 053 EXHZB?T X! Page .1. o£ 2 DAZLY VZH'rCL.~ TR~P GENF.,~A.T~'ON OP. ANOE C0~NTY ~IVXBOt~ENT.,~, ~ August :1.982 p~r~oses b~ ~he Bnvir~xmental ~anagement ;WencM. These races have been lrcm a varieW o£ ~ources, lmcludim~ C~nt-y conducted aC,~les, an~ are deemed represen~aCive o£ land "sea within O~an~e ~nt~. eTE/EO£' iL an abbreviation lot trip ends per ~houaand square ~eec al gross building Iloo£ area. 'TZ/~cre' =e£ers to ~rip ands per ,~eveloped ac~e. Light lndus~rial/ZndusCrial Park Wa:ehouae Single Family De~ached Single Family De~ached-FJt~.ate Multiple Unic (Aper~enf. I, Condos) Mobile Home RmCi~emen~ C~n i~y ~3DGZNG RaCe! Mo~e 1 Hesort accel ('lAC: Use) Neighbo~hood Park Regional Park S~u~e Park ~a=ina Beach · o1£ Course Cas~:ound Tennis Clab · aque~ball Club Elementary ~2~oo1 ~unior High school High School ~unior Colleqe Church - Weekday Church - Sunday 13 176 5 62 26 300 -39- 6 S 1 47 60 80 80 19 60 44 135 42 310 12 T~./Du 15 TE/Du ? TE/DU 5 TE/Du 4 TE/Du 10 TE/no~m 9 TE/P~m 18 · TE/Xocn 4 %"~/Ber th 350 TE/1000' Sho=e S ~/Camps i~.e 43 TE/Cour C 31 T~/Cou= ~ 1.0 TE/S=uden= 0.9 TE/SCuden= 1.4 TE/S~udent 1.5 T~/S=uden= I r 054 Page 2 o£ 2 Use '~/Kif TE/Acre TPVOt. hec 200 R~search Can=et . 10 40 RETA2L Discoun= Store Hardware/Home Zrnproveuen= $0 Shopping Can=a= - l~g£onal $0 ( 30 Shopping Cen~e~ - c~ 70 (l~-30~el) Res~urafl~ - ~ual~y (i.e., Vel'~ H~gry Tige=, ~es~u=an= - High ~= (ia., ~b's, 350 ~y'B, e~c.) ~s~u=an= - Fas= ~ (i.e., ~c~nald's, 900 C~l's J=., e=c.) Au=~bile Sales Service S~ioa S~ke~ 12S 2.80 .'LgS 65 75 Bank - D=i~e In $S0 SOO 900 12S0 400 '750 ~4 T~/ned 3 TE/Be~ KRS:deslT~20-22 -40- 6/11/85