The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-16-1965M.-~JTES OF THE REGULAR Mmm'£/NG OF THE Ci~Y C0~CIL OF THE CIT~ OF SAI~A AHA, C~,r.'~'OI~'IA April 19, 1965 The meeting was called to or~er at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 217 N. Main Street. Roll call was answered by Councilmen James Gilmore, Walter Brooks, Wade Herrin, Tc~ Mc~ichael, and M~yor Harry E. Harvey. Councilmen Davis Burk and J. O~len Markel were absent, but arrived later. APPROVAL OF M~TES On moticm of Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Br~oks and carried, Council approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 5, 1965. Councilmen Burk and Markel arrived at 2:02 p.m. BID AWAI~) - Councilman Gilmore asked that he be CONCESSIONS disqualified from actiou on this awar~ and left the Council table. The City _~anager presented tabulation of bids receive~ and rec~--~ended that Proctor & Webb be awarded the contract to operate concessions at Municipal Stadium for five year perio~beg~um~ng July 1, 1965. On motion of Councilman Markel, seconded hy CouncilmanBrooks and carried, Council ordered filed the report of bids received; approved award of contract to Proctor & Webb; and rejected all other bids. BID :AWAED - Couacilm-~ Gilmore returned to the Ce~ncil PROJECT C-121 table. On motion of Councilman Brooks, seconded by C~uncilm-~ Herrin and carried, Council ordered filed report of bids received for Project 0-121, construction of Alton Street from Main to Halladay; an~ construction of Halladay from Alton to Iryer Road; approved awar~ of contract to Boeck Pavt-=_ Ce~pan~ at unit prices bid; and rejected all other bids. ORD. NS-795 ORDINANCE NS-795 DECLARING 'rm~ ANNEXATION NAR~O~ & WARNER .W. AmN~ OF '£~d~ITOI~Y DESIGNATES "HA_~BOR A~D WAP~E~ WEST A~A~" was read by title. It was moved by Councilmaa Gilmore, seconded by C~uncilman Brooks, that further reading be waived and Ordinance NS-795 be adopted, on roll call vote: AYES, NOES, ABS]~T, ORD. NS-793 C~NC IL~: C0~CIL~EN: Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin, Markel, McMichael, Harvey None None ORDINANCE NS-793 ADOPTING ]~X Rm~E C~TAIN CODES KNOWN AS THE ~u~LDING C~E, 196~ WnITION, VOL~E I AND VOLUME III, THE WES'rF~u~ PLUMBING OFFICIALS UF/FOItM PLUMBING CC~)E, 1964 WmTTION, TEE NATIONAL ~.~ICAL CODE, 1962,~ ~ H~ CODE, 1~ ~ION, ~ ~T~ P~ 0~ ~ ~T~G ~ C~ C~L~G C~E, 1~ ~ION, ~T.~ C~A~ C~ C~C~ - ~1 - ~ril 19, ~ OF THE SA~A AKA M~FICXPAL C~E, A]~ READOPTXNG CHAPTERS l; ~ ~ ~ title. ~ ~s ~ ~ C~ci~ Gi~, sec~ by C~ci~ ~, that ~her ~-~ be ~i~ ~ ~-a~e ~-793 be ~. C~ci~ ~rkel state~ he that the~ sh~ be ~her ~. ~ roll ca~ v~e: AYES, OG~JICILI~I: 01~. 1S-7~6 AUCTION REGULATIONS O]U)~I~ANCE NG-7~ A~XNG SECTiOnS TO 6, ~ 3, ARTXCLE VI OF TKE AHA J~]~CIPAL C~E REGULAT3IG AUCTIONS AID REF~_~ALXBG ~INAUCE NS-778 vas rea~ by title. It vas nove~ by Councilnan Giluore, seccnde~ by Counciluan Breeks that f~rther rea~ing be waived ~ud Or~-~--.e NS-7~6 be a~optad. roll call vote: NOES, ABSENT, Gilmore; Brooks, Bark, ~errin, ~arkel l(cMichael; Harvey None None AYES, C(~CILI(EN: NOES, ABS~T, Gilmore, Brooks, B~rk, Nerrin, Marksl NcMichael, Ka~v~y None None C~D~UCE ~S-803 AMnm~NG ~71 OF TEE SAITA AIA HUJ~CZPAL CG~E Z~ A~D~mJ~ s~-$~c~IC~ (ee) TO ES~A~SN ~ aT~m~ OF ri, urnS ON ~U,I.,L",~ AVEBUE was introduced By title. It was moved by Councilman )hrksl; sec~de~ by Cou~cilvi&u Gilmore and carried that further rea~ing be waived an~ OrA~aance ~S-O03 be l~ssed, to seeced reading. Councllma~ ~rk. el wa~ ~tsq-~,llfle~ fr~, actt~ m~ the following or~imamce a~ left the Coumcll table. C~mc~],,~,~ ~arkel returned to the Council table. RES. 65-62 i~SOL~ION 65-62 OF '~:~ ¢I/~ C0~mCIL ASSES. D~T. 2~ OF T~ C~ OF ~A ~, ~, C~ ~O~IONN0. ~-155 ~ C~ ~r~c ~ ~ ~ ~ A$S~ D~I~ NO. ~ ~s ~ by title. It ~s m~e~ by C~ci~ Gi~, sec~d~ By C~ct~ ~1, that ~her ~ad~ be ~l~d ~ Resolut~ 6~-~ Be ~e~. ~ ro~ ca~ v~e: AYES, NOES, ABS~£, C~N~IL~EN: Gilmore) ~rooks, B~rk, Nerria, ~arkel, ~cNlchael, Harvey RES. 65-63 P,E~0LUTI(~ 65-63 01~ING COB2~C~IC~iS A~S. D~T. 2~ A~ C~CATI~ OF ASS~ ~ D~G~ ~ ~B~ ~I~I~ NO. 2~ ~ ~ by title. I~ ~s ~,~ By C~ci~ Gi~, sec~e~ ~ C~ci~ ~r~l, t~t ~h~ ~ be ~t~ ~ Resol~l~ 65-63 be ~. ~ roll ea~ v~e: AYES, OOUIICII~E~: NOES,, C~]~CIL~: ABSENT, Gilmore, Brooks, Bark, Herrin, Markel, McNlehael, Ha~ v=y None No~e On ~ien of Cotm. cllmul Narkel, seconded By Couneilmu~ Brooks, Comletl ~eferre~ to even~ metins actien on Resolution 65-6~. - 223 - April 19, 1965 DEFf ~G V.A. AT.T.T~ON H~ CO. COl~eilmmw J~Michael vas disqualified frcu action on the follo~tw~ resolution. EESOLUTION 65-58 ~w~-TeG THE DECISION OF THE FLA~m,uG C~SION A~ DEFfXNG VAI~A~CE ON APPLXCATXG~ ~0. 20~0 ~,Lwa B~ ~ur.v~oN ~ CO. was read by title. Vt was moved By Councilman ~rooks; seee~le~ by Councilman Markel; that further remling be waivad and Resolution 65-55 be a~pteA. On roll call vote% NOES; ABSENT, R~ - JO CAS~ Gilmore; ~ooks, Bark, Herrin, ~rkel, Harvey ][one None Mc~Lichael Deeds for acceptance were suhnitte~l fraa the followiug: The Pacific Coast Latin American Conference of the Free ~ethodist Church of North America; easeaent for street purposes c~ the south side of M~rtle Between Spruce an~ Forest~ V. F. aml Maurine X. Cr~ld~; easeaent for street purposes cn the north 8id~ of Talbert, west of Harbor Beulevard; Jolm A. ~hi~-~_~-r; easement for alley purposes ou the north si~e of ?.~m~; ~ feet east of Parton~ bt C. an~ ~ Rosere, easement for street purposes ami tvo sl~n~rel shaped parcels of lena on the north side of Santa Clara betenen Main aaa Brondm~v; Borg-Warner Corporatie~; easetent for street lrdrposes Gu the south side ef Dona~t No and Joan Ro Franklin; easement for street a~d public utility purposes on SLxteenth; west of Daisy; Alice A. Weyant; easement for street and lmblic utility purposes on Sl.~teenth; west of Daisy. AYES, C0~NCIT.~E~: ·OES, C~g~CIL~E~ Gilmore, ~rooks, ~B~.~.~rrin, ~arkel, ~c~ichael, ~arvey Noue None RES. 65- 7 PoP.S.Ao ~lOwas rosA by title. by Councilman Gilmore~ that further reading be waived an~ Resolution 6~-57 be ad.pred. On roll call vote: m. 65-6o VACATE C~'ECXL~E~, C~TECIL~E~: Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, ;errin, Markel, Noue None SAATa A~9 EIG~T~ STREE~ A~9 A i~-F00T A~.tw~ ~ EAST A~ ~EST BE~==. SA~D ~0 8~ ~0~ ~ ~ VA~ ~ O~ ~CE OF ~ Tsw.~ ~s ~ ~ title. It ~s m~ by C~c~ ~1: sec~ by C~ei~ ~i~o~ t~t ~her ~ be ~i~ ~d Reso~ti~ 6~ be a~e~. ~ roll call v~e~ C~ C~ - 22~ - A~il 19, 1~5 N0w~, C~UNCIL~: A~ C~CII~: Gilmore, Brooks~ Burk, He~rin~ Markel~ Nc~ichael, Harvey None None P~. 65-67 RESOI~ION 65-6? A~T~ORI~2~ P~IO]{ $~C'~L F~ ~ ~ ~ OF ~~ OF ~E ~I~ C~ ~T~G ~C~ION OF ~ ~ '~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~GE C~ T~ ~ ~OV~E ~L F~ ~I~ ~~ F~S ~ FA~ ~s ~ title. It ~s m~d ~ C~cl~ ~1~ sec~e~ ~y C~ci~n Gi~e~ t~t ~her re~i~ be ~l~ ~d Resolution 65-67 be ad'ted. ~ roll call vote: AYES~ HOE~, ES. 65-68 D~.~' - CASH CONSIDERATION C~UNCIL~: Gilmore, Brook~, Burk, Herrin, Markel, NcNichael, Harvey Ncme None ~ RESOLUTION 65-68 ACCE~TI~ A FROM CIA~DE C. AI~ GI~CE SHO~K =~ 1~ A CASH COI~ID~TI~ OF $50,600.00 was read by title. It was aove~ hy Councilman l~arkel, seconded by Counci!~- ~urk, that further reading be. waived an~ Resolution 65-68 he a~opted. On roll call vote: AYE~ COUN~EN: Gilmore, ~rooks, ~rk, Herrin, Narkel, Nc~ichael, Harvey NOES, COUNCILMEN: None ABS~ COUNCII~EN: None EASieST AG~. On metion of C~unc~- Br~oks, sec~e~l by Councilman Burk amA1 carrie~ Cmmcil authorize~ execution of agreememt with Southera Pacific Rai].roa~ regar~lug grant of easement for 12 foot water main cros~t-E Dyer Roa~, east of Hallidmy. On motion of COU~C~1man ~roo~l, seconde~ by Councilman Burk anti carried, the follewing charade orders to contracts were appr~ve~: Change Order ~11 to contract with T. P. Polich an~ Polich ~ene~ict C~nstrUctiom Company for Pro~eet 1~8 in the ameunt of $219.70. O~er ~12 to contract with T. P. Polich ~d Polich Benedict Construction for l~oJect 1~8 in the amount of $91.~9. SIG~ E~OAtI~T 0a action of Councilman ~rooks~ seconded by Counc~m-n Burk an~ carrie~, Council authorize~ agreement with ~alker Si~n Cc~pany an~ Lawrence E. ~elton regarding sign at 80~ Eaat 17th street. - 22~ :- April 19, 1965 T~ACT ~ on ~etiea of Councilman ~rooks, aeae~l by O~cil~an ~Ark anal carrieA, C~uncil authori~e~ acceptaace of agreement a~A performance bad to 'guarantee construction of i~rove~ents i~ T~act ~ with Jose Rosa~ when CcacorA Street is ~peneA. NOTICE OF ~EARX~ - On ~mti~ of C~Auc~w~ Gil~ore~ sece~de~ by Cosacil~aa Narkel anA carrie~, the fallowing cmsaunicatl~s were ordered file~ before the Public ~ilities Cee~aissic~, re,stAins Greenville crossiug of l~acific Electric Railway in. Santa Ans. CAV~ .A~e~A~TIC8 BOA.T~ - B~reau ee~waela' a~wer to +Jae ~eti~ of the ~p~t ~ C~rce f~ c~el!~ti~ of the cases of ~ York A~s, ~c., ~s ~elos A~s~ ~c. ~ ~ic~o ~lic~er A~s~ ~.~ ~te o~ ~oceed~ ~ ~r of ~s ~eles A~, ~c., to ~ion to c~oli~te. VA ~0~, o~ce ~ ~ the P ~tri~ at ~1 ~. ~ash~ - ~. VA 2101, ~ - ~t ~s~ce ~ ~ti~ to ~ist~g ~si~nce aA~la~ s~ ~ C 1 ~stri~ at ~ S. Briste! - ~. VA 21~ ~ - e~t~ r~ ~ti~ t~t encr~che~ ~to VA 2~, ~ - e~t~ct r~ ~tl~s te ~s~ce that ene~ ~e ~A at~t ai~ y~ at 1~ S. G~eY - ~. VA 21~ ~ - c~t~ s~ f~ ~sid~ce t~t eacr~ches //~ CO~ ~ ~A~ - the ~ip~s of Ri~r ~a~ ~Ject Act. Rese~ti~ of the ~ of S~is~ 9f V~t~ ~ty au~ ~g~ti~ C~ ~ ~E - Reae~ti~ a~ ~ en~ers~ the ~ed s~te c~ituti~l ~t No. 17, ~t~ to te~ ~ ~eut~. ¢~OF R~I~G - Resoluti~ sUl~erting the e~ac~ent ef A.Bo 1218, pertaining to the lmrehase ef reven~e preduci~ facilities by local agencies. CTFf COmlCTT- - 226 - ' Dtvist~a of ~i~hways eea~enlcatlen proposing Study f~r PIA~-in~ a Co~cimttng ~ Pr~gr~ after 1~72. ?~ C~m~entcation a~d Resolutie~ from Beard of S~ervis~rs of Los A~eles Cowry urging support of rec.,est to PrestAent Johwaos to call ~hite Xeuse conference c~ air l~llution control i~ 1~5. ~ SPACE COACK L~; /NC. - Applicati~a before the Public U~ilities Ccmmissieex for authority to iss~ st~k ~r evi~nce of ~ess ~ f~ a Ce~icate of ~c C~ve~ce ~d ~ecessity. //~ ~AC ~ - Rep~ ef t~lc e~trol Ae~ces ~ta~ or ~ ~-~1-65 ~ mott~a of Councilma~ ~arkel, seco~de~ by C~ct~ ~ ~ ca~i~ C~ctl o~e~ ~e City Att~ey to ~e a ~solmti~ su~e~ leg~ti~ to e~trol ~strib~i~ ~ obse~e llterat~. ~~ ~~ ~ ~i~ of C~e~l~- Gi~o~, sec~ by C~ct~ ~ ~ ca~t~ ~th C~ci~w ~k ~ 'No=, C~cil authorim~ the t~-~fer of ~,~ fr~ ~ iI-~ (C~cil C~t~) to ~ 11-111 ~g~ti~) t9 ~ovi~e f~ ~t of s~c~l atto~ fees (Grivi ~ ~r) f~ ~l~ ~g ~b~ ~, 1~5. At ~:20 p.m., on motion of C~unctlman Gilmore, seoon~e~ by Comnellman Nerrln and carrie~ Comncil a~Journe~ to a Cc~rittee asa ~hole to .~tseu,ss general Civic Center ~a,. The Council rece~vene~ at 5:5S p.m. with all Councilmen present and, ma motion of Couacil~aa MeNichael; secc~e~l by Council~ Br~oks on~ carrie~, reeense~ uutil 7:~0 p.mo The ~eeting was rec~vened at 7:30 porn. in the Council Chaa~era, with all Co~ucil~ea present. Follov~-E the Pledge of Allegiance to the FZag, the ~avocation was ~elivere~ by the Reverend Villion ~htte; First Presbyterian Church. Counc~l,~ ~ichael state~ that he wonl~ abstain frs voting ca hearings regar~wE z~u~ since he had al~eaely voted up~ theea as a P~--~4-2 Ccmai~si~aer. ~FARI~ - Xear~-~ was ope~e~l on A~eaA~e~t Applicattca 5~ - ~ CO. ~ find by ~e ~e C~, pr~ to ~ Serial Distrl~ ~p ~9 ~ rec~ss~ ~ t~ A1 ~ ~ ~stri~8 the ~ ~latrict~ pr~y ~ the south st~e of N~ ~ '~ V~r ~d ~ca. P~ C~ssi~ Resolutl~ ~7~ rec~ a~ruv.l CIT~ CO~CIL - 227 - April 19, 1965 The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published in The Register, that Affidavit of l~bLtcati~ was oa file, an~ that no ~itte~ eemmnicatioas had been receive~. There being no resp~use to the ~r's call for test~, the hearing was close~. It was ~ov~l by Couact*h''-', Gillmre, sec~maed by Counctllan Burk, that Council approve the reclassiftcatiun and instruct the City Attarney to prepare a~ smear- ing ordinance according to Exhibit AA 5~ A. On roll call vote: AYES, NOES, ABSTA/~, Gilmore, ~;rooks~ Bvrk, l[erri~, ~arkel, ~ Mc~ichael HEAR]JiG - Keartn~ was opene~ en A~end~ent AA ~7 - D~ A~llcati~ ~7 file~ ~ ~lph W. ~ propos~ the ~e~nt ~ Secti~l Dintrict ~p ~-~-~ by ~c~ssi~ ~ the R 1 ~lstri~ to the R ~ Alstrt~ p~y ~ the s~h si~e of ~k beton ~istol ~ ~. P~ C~sai~ ~ol~tion ~7BB ~c~d a~r~l of ~ibit ~ 5~7 A. ~e Cl~k re~e~ t~t n~ice of the he~g ~ ~sh~ ~ ~e Register~ t~t A~i~vit ~f ~cati~ ~s ~ fi~ ~ t~ ~o ~lttea c~i~ti~ ~ be~ recel~d. Ralph Dreunan, 1918 V~ca*~.'-~l Place, applicant, stated his property is surrounded by apartments a~d a chaw_~e to R 3 z~ing was logical for the area. There being ne /%trther testi~oay~ the hearing was closed. Tt was move~ by Councll~ Markel, seconded by C~Aucll~an gerrin, that Council approve the reclassification end ~-atruct the City Attoraey to prepare an amending or~-Ance accor~-~ to Exhibit AA ~7 Ao On roll call votel AYES, CO~CXL~E~: NOES, COU~C~: ABSENT, ABSTAZN, Gilmore, ~rooks, ~Ark; Kerrin, ~arkel, Ns.-vey Mc~Lchael ~EAI~NG - ~earing was ~pene~ ca A~and~eat AA ~ - P~. C~. A~cati~ ~ ftl~ by the P~ C~issi~ ~os~g the ~e~nt of 8ectt~l District ~ps 30-~-~ ~ ~1-~-~ ~c~sai~ ~ the ~ ~stri~ ~ ~e M 1~ ~ ~ C 2 districts ~r~y n~h~et ~d s~st of the ~te~e~i~ of the 1~ ~ ~ of ~ibit ~ ~ A; ~ ~ ~c~ss~ ~m ~ to C 20 ~e Cl~k that N~iee of the ~8 ~s ~b~s~ ~ ~e Re~st~; that ~fi~vit of ~blicati~ ~s on file; ~ t~t no ~itten c~icatio~ ~ be~ received. George ~a~wall, Coordinate- of the Zn~uotrial Develolaaeat Divisl~ of the Chamber of Cca~rce, reviewed previous stand of the Divisiun when the district was reclassified fr~ ]~ 1 to CD, and referre~ to Special Study ~3~ which covered the ~a~er reasons why the Industrial Divisiun asked denial of the orig~l request to rezoue to CD. ~e stated that altho-~ tmtustry could tolerate C 2 z(ming, they questione~ the a~visability of it Because of the types of Businesses, such as carnivals, that could operate at the entrunce of the city; an~ re. in, ed Council that the General Plma consultants recmmended M 1 zo-~, which the ~anufacturers preferrml. Sam ~eyes, $17 ~1. Broadway, represent~-.m M. Sa]c.ioka, the property ovner, stated he had ~et with the Flmmtug ComLtsstou, au~ that C 2 zoalng ha~ been c~asi~ere~ the ~ost desirable. There he~-~ no further teott~o~y, the hearth=_ was close~l. zt was zmve~ by C~Amctl~an Gilmore, seconded by CouucJl~m~ Brooks, that Council C~ CO~]~CIL April 19, I: approve the reclessificatiea and inotraet the City Attorney te prepare a~ a~endi~g ~rAinanee according to E~hibit ~A :5~ A. On roll call vote: AYES, C~NCIL~EN: NOES, COUNCIL~: AESE~T, CO~CILNE~: A~STAXN, Gila=re, Breoks, B~rk, Herrin, Markel, FA=.~y McMichael HEAIt~G - Hearing was openeA ~a Appeal 1~ file~ APPF~L 1~ ~ ~a~-*~ ~s~ts ~ (V.A. ~) ~ita ~s, ~c., ~ the P~ C~ssi~'a ~ial of V~ce A~cati~ 2~ to c~t~ct a 93 ,.-~t a~t c~ ~ the A 1 ~strict at ~61~ W. ~c~. ~e Clerk ~p~e~ t~ n~ice ~f the he~ ~s ~ile~ to adjacent pr~y ~ers ~ April ~, 1~, ~d t~t ac ~itten e~i~ti~ ~ been recei~. Dale Heir, 611 W. ~h, representing the appellR-t, reTaeste~ centi~-A, Ce until th· next meeting. motion of Counc~lm- ~arkel, seceded By C~cil~an Werrin ~ carrie~, C~ncil cc~tinue~ the heart,_= to May 3, 1965 at 7:30 porn. in the Council /$ HEAKI~} - Hearin6 was ~peaed en Appeal 1~9 filed APPEAL 159 by A. R. a~d Helena Fam~laro frc~ the (V.A. 2099) P~A~-~-_= Commission's denial of Variance Application ~099 to construct a hospital for the care ~ treatment of geriatrics, psychiatrics and alcholics in the R 1 district at 1~20 Eo Santa C~a~a. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was meile~ to a~Jacent ~r~y ~wners o~ April 13~ 196~, a~A letters in ~pposition baa been received fren Esther aud ~ar~ha Sex~-~r, 16~12 E. Santa Clara, ~rs. Ja~es Go Toepfer, President, Sierra PTA, 1509 E. Washimgtc~, and Louis an~[ Helene Young, 1628 S. Santa The Clerk presented a letter fr~a Jack J. l~imel, attorney for the applicant, request~_= withdrawal of the application ~ecause the escrow ha~ been cancelle~. On m~ci~ of Councilman Gilmore, sec~n~e~ by C~uuc~--~ Br~uks an~ carrie~, Council ordere~ the letters file~ a,& declarecl procee~ings on Variance Application 2099 terminate~l. ~RING - APPEAL 160 (VoAo lleari~6 was o~eme~, en Appeal 160 file~ by Jer~ J. a~ ~lad~s R. ~ere fr~a the Z~m~g A~-istrntor's ~enial of Variance Application 2091 to c~ustr~ct a r~a a~itien that encroaches into required rear yar~ at 3016 W. El~ero The Clerk reported that notice of the hear~ was maile~ to ad~acant property owmere on April 12th, a~t that no written c~uicati~s had been received. Eugene Eat~ik, 120~ N. Br~dway, attoxney representing the appellant, sub~/tted a petition with 1~ signatures of nei~b~ring property e.~ere who d/~ not object tO the proposed encroacluaent. On ~aotien of Co~tuc~l~n Gilmore, secenAe~l By Council--- Brooks amd carrie~, Council ox~ere~ the petition fileel. Mr. ~at~ik also submitted a letter frc~ his client's t-=ura~ce cca~u~ which state~ that ~ a~d/tic~al rate in insurance w~ald be re~t-e~. On ~ti~ of Co~u~cil~aa Gilmore, sec~e~l By C~ucil~a~ Brooks an~ carrie~l, the letter was erdere~ file~. Nrc Eatnih reviewe~ his conversation with Fire ~arshall Dachtelle, who state& that a patio c~verage was more hazardous than a roc~ a~diti~ with a firevall. He state~ that a two hour firewall was p~--~d, --~ a rock an~ tar r~of. There bei~6 no furt~ertesti~e~y, the heur~ was closed. The Planning Director gave the historical backgrcunA of the area and previous ClT~ C~CIL - 229 - April 19, 196~ policy of the Coucil; a~l CegmLission regax~li~ rear ~ ~re& ~n ~ square foot lots. v~ rebuttal; Mr. Katnik stated that lava and rules change; that Oouncil has discretionary power to regulate variance per~issi~l~ that in c~trast to us~l opposition, neighbors suppox~ced the applicant; that neighbors were disappointed at & recent re~ lmer~ltti~g an addition ~ver a garage vben a b&ck~A~l ad~itic~ ~ have been preferreA. Chief Garthe of the Fire Depar~ent outline~l the following points: Fire (epa.-tnents request ~ ~ se~ti~ f~ access to f~t f~ ~ f~ pr~e~i~ of ne~b~ h~es. a ~ater ~ to ~ ~b~ q~er8 wi~ fi~ fe~ ~f a pro~y l~e. c~ ~t ~ite ~e ~ ~t ~stigat~ ~e c~t~ces. O~ci~ ~k ~ ~. ~ta~ if ~ ~ n~ ~t to neg~iate ~th his client ~a~ as ~ ~ ~t~ ~ sq~re feet of the additi~ ~queste~. ~. ~tnik aske~ for a ~cisi~. It was ~ve~ by Ceuacilean ~rook~, sec~ed by C~ncil~s~ Burk that Couucil ~verrule the actl~ of the Zon~ A~ainistrator a~ ~-atruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution ~ra~ting Variance 20~1 subject to applicable cc~iti~s. The motion was lost Gu roll call vote: AYES, IOES, C~CXLH~z · ~ C~NCXL~z A~STA~ Brooks, B~rk; ~errin Gilmore, ~arkel, Barvey Xc~ichael Mr. Eatn~ requested a continuance but was ~*orne~ by ~ayor wa-wey that he was ~ut of ~rAer since the hearing was closed a~A the ~r~i~a was ~eclareel lost. was uoveA by Councilman Markel, seco~Ae~ by Couuciluan Br~oks that Council recousider aba poss the entire uatter back to the staff to negotiate. Co~u¢il~a~ Gilmore stated the hazards of foLl~elug ench a pr~ce~ure, since it ~pe~e~l the ~oer f~r all disatlsfte~l appel~-nts. Dale ~einl~ ~11 W. Sth~ expressed the opinion that since there had been a tie vote, it vas a~visable to continue the matter for fu~her study. Mayor Harvey x~u~[ed Mr. Hainl~ that a tie vote is a lost The ~cien to recc~siAer was lost on roll call vote. AYES, C~CXL~E~ Br~eks, Harrin, ~arksl · OES~ C~C~ Gilmore, ~ark, ~arvey A~S~T, C~C~ None ABSTAXN~ COU~CXLI~J: Kc~ichael /$ ~EARI~G - Hasting was opened c~ Appeal 1~1 APPEAL 161 fileA by the Public Works Director (¥.A. 20~9) rrm the P~-~,~,,_~ ¢ca~issim's &ppr~val of Varig'ace Application filed by G,L.A. DeveleI~emt Co. to ce~str~c~ a service station in the R 1 district at 1~9 S. The Clerk repor~eql that no, ice of the hearing was mailed to 8dJacent property owners ca April ~ 1~ enel that no written cce~atnicati~as h~l haen receiveA. The l~J~llc l~'~'ks Director stated after meeting with the interested lmrties, an agreeBent baa been reached regorAing the plot p~-~, aml recamend~ that the variance be gra~ted with a ~lifieatien of C~aditien 7 an~ an additional c~itio~ regarding EAlnger i~prove~ents. EAvar~ ~rhe; 1~ S. 3itch, protested construction of a gasoline station so close to his h~me. There being no further testiuo~; the hearing was closed. CITY COUNCIL - 2~0 - April 1~; 1~ On notion of Couneiluan ~ilu~re; 8eece~ed by Councilua~ Bur~ ami carri~l; ¢o~cil al~OVed ~-.at~_~ of Ya~iaace 208~ sub3ect to the con~itio~s enumerated by the Plmmins Cemmies~ca with ~c~litien ? being revised to read 'subject to revised Plot Pl~uau an~ the add/tiaa of Cc~litic~ 10-b, requir~n~ that ~e~ication an~ l~rove~ents e~ E~u~er be accorAlng to plan en file in the Department: of Public Works. RES. 65-6~ Correctieas of assessaent ASSESS. DIST. 218 iu Assessment District 21~' hav~.been made ~OL~TIC~ 6~-6~ OF C~b~CIL OF ~, C~A~ AS C~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ OF ~her ~ Be ~ive~ ~d Resoluti~ 6~-~ be ~o~e~. ~ ro~ call v~e ~ CWCXL~ ~ ABS~T; Gilmore~ Brooks, Burk~ Herrin, Markel, ~tichael; Karvey N~ne TRA~xC ISLAND The City ~nager reporte~ o~ requests for remuval of painte~ islaaA Alvi~er between 700 ~-~ 800 N. Bristol; explaining that the islan~ permits ne ~i~-block turns. He revtewe~ the present tra.*fic volmae c~ Bristol a~At the proJecte~ increase By General Plan traffic coas~Altants and strongly arge~ ~ealal ef the re. quest. Dale Heinly, ~11 ~. 8~h, representing the Bristol 0il C~n~, referre~ to two areas having such left ~,,,~e turns~ stating that the incoasistency worke~ a hardship ca the businesses involve~. The City ~-~ser re~lied that Street was Bud~eteA for ~evelc~aent in 1~ to a width of ~0~ feet west of Bristol; ,a~A to reaaove the islan~ woulA be a regression. On ruction of Councihaea Burk, secc~ed by Councils~m Markel an~ carrieA, Council ~enie~l the request for ~o~1 of painte~ is1~4 Aivi~er between 7th and ~h on Bristol. CAMERON The City Manager gave a repor~ COMPLAINT a c~int file~ By ~ ~er~ t~t he ~ ~ated sta~nts ~e by c~~, ~e ~icere ~wl~ ~ a ~t~ss, ~ ~at ~ne of the stat~s c~o~6 to ~. Ca~'s stot~ t~ ~he ~~ ~ nc Ml~tl~ ~ ~st~a~t~ ~at he felt the~ a~ s~ici~t ~Bst~ce to subst~iate the c~ ~ rec~ t~t the ~tter be cl~se~. On ~oti~a of Ce~acil~an Gilmore, seceaAed by Council--- Brooks aaa carrieA; Council ~x~ereA the report fileA. Mr. Markel aske~ that ]tr. Calaeron be advised of the ~mager's report aaa Na~or Harvey agreed he woul~ be. l~eLt~ RecerA of S~--wey ~ file~ by ~aul ¥. ~M~ba~a creating fear X 1 l~cs north of Yaraer; east of ~athaway, subJeet te ~he ce~itiow~ eutline~ in the Plam~i~g Pirect~r's rep~x~c AateA April 8, 1~. Revise~ Tentative Tract l~ap ~8~5 was flle~ by LiAo C~tracti~a Ce~e~atie~ ereati~g sixty-five R ~ lets nerth of Seats Clara, west ef ]ewpe~c Freeway. ~a ~r~ie~ of C~ucil~e~ Bro~k~; seee~le~l by Co~cil~m ~rk aaa earrie~; Co, oil appr~veA ReviseA Tentative Traet ~ap 5~, subject to ccaditA~s in pl~w,~,~ Director's repor~ date~ April 12, 1~. was ce~i~ereA by Co~acilo Letter fr~a Wo So ~essenger a~l J~ha ). Ei~'oy COo req~est~ waiver of siAewalk req~ire~e~ts on the north siAe of Caster between Yale RECESS At ~2~ p°m. the ~er ealle~ a five z~rate recess. At ~28 p~ao the Ce~cil ree~ave~eA with all C~eil- ~a ~s~t. ~e City ~er stat~ t~t ~e .t~ c~ ~e~ t~t ~e mi~ ~nt be e~te~ t~o~i~ f~ this ~tc~&' 1~ split. ~n ~tiaa ef Ceu~cil~n Gil~re, secmde~ by C~e~ ~1 C~eil ~i~ the s~ ~q~nts ~ ~1~ ~p ~. a~i~ ~s aeceas~ ~8t ~ ~tio~ ~ M~s to bef~e the ~1 C~teati~ C~aai~ l~t~ at ~1~ ~. ~er ~k~ see~ ~ C~ci~ ~ ~ e~i~, C~eil ~ the letter ~. N- P~ ~. ~ ~i~ of C~ci~ Gi~e~ see~ ~ C~ci~ ~ket c~ C~cil ~fe~ te st~f f~ ~ at the ~ 17~ ~erae~i~ ~ N. ~k ~ ~ ~. ~e City ~er s~e ~ ~ a pr~y ~r ~ the ~a, he ~t~ no ~ ~ the C22Y C~C~L - 2~?. - April 19, 1~ RESXGNATXON Oa ~tion of Cc~aeilman..Marka~ secca~ed ~ C~c~ ~ ~ c~ C~c~Z acce~e~ the ~etter as a ~er ~ the P~ C~ssi~ ~ to his ~e~t eleeti~ to the City C~cil; ~- ~=t~ t~ Cl~k to p~p~ a Ce~lcate of C~ti~ f~ h~s ~ee~t se~ice. receipt tax em telephone c~ies. ~SI~SS C~A~T cashier, Ceuucil referred to staff f~r invest~gatiu and re~rt a c~lmi~t filed by Viola Alleaby, 21~ I. Cotter regarding a buiness operating ia a restricted area at 22~1 N. Cetter. effective April Oa ~e~ioa of Ceunc~lmn Gilmore; seeon~ed by Ceumei~man MeMiehael earried; Cu~-cil of $11.25 to Austin Tew~e=, assessed l~ error f~r weed reaeval. City ama Conmtry, April 23 to ~ay 3, seconded by Coumeilman XcMichael amd carried, the City Att~A-aey ~ greeted permissiu to be aheeat fru the CI~CC~TER C~ac~lmw ~kel stated that he wished it elearl~ mnAeret~ that he felt the a~imistratiu should net g~ Uall ~ut' to acquire ~eperty for the prepesed Civic Cuter t~rovement. CITY C~IL ' - 233 - April 19, 1965 several ruths a~e varie~$ ~te~ wre referrea to e~ees ~ =~sis. ~e Clerk ~ ~ct~ to fo~ this POLICE DE~T. Ce~ucil~aa ~arkel ~ as to the ~tat~ ef t~ ~ce ~st~ti~ ~ ~ ~-*~ ~ ~e City ~ ~hat a ten po~t p~ ~ be~ ~t~t~; copies ~ vht~ ~ a~i~b~ to C~cil~ ~ ~e h~ of ~ l~ ~ st~ ~; ~at h a~ ~her ~spe~s the situti~ ~s ~11 s~bi~z~. ~ C~c~ ~Eel stat~ ~t a~ the ~ ~t~s~t t~ yeht yo~p ~e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ti~. b City Att~ ~s to tb a~hbi~ty ~ ~e B~i~ R~ to t~ n~ C~ucil. SFEC. ~ The City ~mager *-*er~e~ Co~cil D~CT. ~at ~ ~e n~ ~da he ~st~ be 4n4ttat~ ~ the SFECIAL ~mT~ The City ~-,,,,_mer lw.fox-meA C~ctl ~ at the ~ C~cil ~ he ~ ~ a spec~l e~t~ f~ ~ the City ~er to ~ it ~sstb~ f~ ~he ~r8~l ~ to ~1~ ~e se~i~s of a p~fesst~l h~ o~tc~ so t~t ~e ~ ~d m~ ~ ~o sit ~ a~ of tb actt~ a~a~ by ~l~ees. ~ ~ s~emt~ ~ ~o ~cl~ ~h~ to e~ ~-~te the necessi~ f~ C~cil to e~s ~e of Ci~ elect ices. Joh~ able,Is, ewner of preper~y ia ~a~ta A~a Gardea~ eee~lai~A abe~t the i~uey of street a~A side- walk miatemce. ~ Xirker, 5015 W. l~h; Aiscusse~ with C~ctl ma~[ staff, street a~l fl~ preble~m ia the ~est Sa~a Aha a~ea. C2Ff CO~ClL ..- 23~ - April 19, Del Nichael, ~17 $. Te~-~, aske~ Ceuacil to c~si~er aa a~ea~ez~ te the electi~ l~w sta~i~ ~h~t CanAi~ates electe~ to office ~t receive & ~aJority ~a~ea~ · f a plurality of the v~ces cast. ~ere being no fux~her ~miness to c~me before t~e Council, the meting vas ad~ourne~ a~ lOt~5 ~.m., ~a no~ion of Ce~uc~,~,, Oilnore, sec~mde~ ~y Couaelluan D~RI~ ~. ~ CLE~ OF T~E CO~CXL - 235 -