Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-03-1966ML%EPrES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF T~E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA january 3, 1966 The meeting was called to ol~ler at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 217 N. Main Street. Roll call was answered by Councilmen James Gilmore, Walter Brooks, Davis Burk, Wade Herrin, J. Ogden Markel, Tom McMichael, and Mayor Harry N. Harvey APPROVAL OF MINUTES On motion of Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, Council approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 20, 1965. BID AWARD - On motion of Councilm-n Brooks, 5 AUTOS seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, Council ordered filed report of bids received for five autos, Spec. 621-58; awarded the contract to Monte Peters Plymouth; and rejected all other bids. BID AWARD - On motion of Councilman Gilmore, 1 AUT0 seconded by Councilman Brooks and carried, Council ordered filed report of bids received for one auto, Spec. 621-59; awarded the contract to George Dumton, Inc.; and rejected all other bids. BID AWARD - Council again considered bids PIPE received for 8" and 12" class 150 asbestos pipe, Spec. h81-36, action on which was continued from December 20, 1965. The City Manager reviewed his written report wherein he stated the City Attorney had informed him the City has the right to place in the specifications the requirement for American-made pipe; that such a requirement was on the subject specifications; and he recnmmended the Keenan Pipe & Supply Co. bid on Belgium-made pipe be declared not in conformance with specifications, and that the contract be awarded to the next lowest bidder in conformance with specifications. On motion of Councilman Brooks~ seconded by Councilman Gilmore and carried, Council ordered filed the City Manager's report and tabulation of bids received; awarded the contract to Certain-teed Products Corp. as the lowest bid meeting specifications; and rejected all other bids. RES. 66-1 RESOIYOTION 66-1 ADOPTING PllECISE P.P.S.A. ~13 STREET ALIGNMENT OF FAIRVIEW STREET BETWEEN WAP~NER AVENUE AND THE SOUTN CITY LIMITS AS~{OWN ON EXHIBIT P.P.S.A. ~13 was read by title. It was moved by Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Burk that further reading be waived and Resolution 66-1 be adopted. On roll call vote: AYES, NOES, ABSENT, CITY COUNCIL COUNCILA~EN: G~lmore, Brooks, Burk, Nerrin, Markel, McMichael, Harvey COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None - 432 - January 3, 1966 RES. 66=2 V.A. 2189-HONER Councilm-u Gilmore disqualified himself because of a conflict of interest and left the Council table. RE~0UJTION 66-2 OVERRULING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COM2&ISSION AND DENYING VARIANCE ON APPLICATION NO. 2189 FIT~ BY ALLISON HONER CO. was presented to Council. Discussion followed of the problem of the Municipal Code requiring decisions by resolution on zoning matters; a resolution requiring a majority vote and the effect of a tie vote at the prior meeting at which time Council makes its determination. A change in procedures so that the original action of Council would be sustained at the time of the adoption of the resolution w~s suggested. The City Attorney pointed out that in Judicial proceedings it would take a majority vote to over- rule an accomplished decision of a lower bo~y. Mayor Harvey noted the chair had ruled ~mthe ~ievo~e~t~he~-la~.meet~ng,:be~E::mnabl~ to obtain the:~ Attorney"s ruling, and suggested the questions Be referred to the Attorney for resolution today, Councilman NcMichael moved that the decision of the Council at the last legal meeting be upheld and that the resolution be prepared and signed as so indicated. The motion was seconded by Councilm-n Markel. Mayor Harvey replied to a question from the Clerk that this was action on the resolution before Council, the reading of which would be waived. Councilman Brooks stated he was going to vote for the motion, not to change his original decision, but because the Council had By tie vote denied the variance and his vote for the resolution would Be to sustain the intent of Council. Fred Forgy, attorney for the variance applicant, suggested the question of overruling action of a lower body by tie vote be submitted to the City Attorney to avoid possible legal action. RESOLUTION 66-20VEHRULING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING CO~ISSION AND DENYING VARIANCE ON APPLICATION NO. 2189 was adopted on roll call vote: AYES, COUNCII~4EN: Brooks, Markel, McNichael, Harvey NOES, COUNCII~4EN: Burk, Herrin ABSTAIN, COUNCIIA~EN: Gilmore ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: None Councilman Gilmore returned to the Council table. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Following a discussion of what constitutes a conflict of interest, the City Attorney was requested to furnish to Council information regarding this subject, including that available from the League of California Cities. RES. 66-3 RESOLUTION 66-3 AM~fDING SECTION 3 PAYROLL CLk~K OF RESOLUTION NO. 58-281 TO ADD THE CLASS TITLE OF PAYROLL CLEF/( was read By title. It was moved hy CouncJlm-n ]]rooks; seconded By Councilman Burk that further re~ding be waived and Resolution 66-3 be adopted. On roll call vote: AYES, COUNCILMEN: Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin, Markel, McMichael, Narvey NOES, COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: None C~<g~NCIL - 433 - January 3, 1966 It was moved by Councilman Brooks, seconded by Council~- Burk and carried, that Council approve Job specifications for payroll clerk as submitted. RES. 66-2 RESOLUTION 66-2 AUTaORIZING COND~NATION C0ND~N4NATION OF RIGRT OF WAY FOR THE U-1-A STORM DRAIN CHANNEL was read by title. It was moved by Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilm-n Burk that further reading be waived and Resolution 66-2 be adopted. On roll call vote: AYES, COUNC II~t: NOES, C 0UNC ~: ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Nerrin, Markel, McMichael, Harvey Hone Hone RES. 66-5 RESOLUTION 66-5 ACCEPTING A DRRD DEED - NO CASH ~E TEE C~fY IS PAYING NO CASH CONSIDERATION (Rosenson Properties) was read by title. It was moved by Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman B~k that further reading be waived and Resolution 66-5 be adopted. On roll call vote: AYES, CO~FNC Ir24EN: NOES, COUNCILME~: ABS~T, C0~NCILMEN: Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin, Markel, McMichael, Harvey Hone Hone RES. 66-6 RESOLUTION 66-6 ACCEPTING A D.:,:,, - CASH WHERE THE CITY IS PAYING A CASH CONSIDERATION (Birnbaum) was read by title. It was moved by Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Burk that further reading be waived and Resolution 66-6 be adopted. On roll call vote: AYES, COUNCILMEN: NOES, COUNCII~5~: ABSENT, C0UNCII/~EN: Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Berrin, Markel, McMicheel, Harvey Hone Hone AG~. - On motion of Councilman Markel, PROJ. 129 seconded by Councilman Gilmore and carried, Council authorized execution of agreement with Orange County Flood Control District reimbursing City for certain work on Santa Ann-Delhi Channel. R/WAY CERTIFICATION for Project 145 (Grand Avenue - A~r 281). On motion of Councilman Markel, seconded by Councilman Gilmore and carried, Council authorized execution of Right of Way certification CHANGE ORDER On motion of Councilman Markel, seconded by Councilman BlLrk carried, Council approved Change Order i to c~ntrnct with R. W. Beadle, Inc. for Project D-49, storm~rain lining between McFadden and First, and Project C-107, improvement of Willits, Fairview to Sullivan, in the amount CITY COUNCIL - 43~ - January 3, 1966 WRITT~ C O~4UNICATIONS On motion of Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Herrinand carrie~, Council ordered filed the following communications: VARIANCE & CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Decisions made by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Cr~mtssion where no appeal has been filed: V.A. 2195, Schultz - construct gasoline service station in R 1 district at 701 S. Euclid -APPROVED. V.A. 2196, Schliebe - convert portion of single family residence into antique shop in P district at 418 W. 2nd - APPROVED. V.A. 2197, First National Bank of Orange County - waive 15' landscape strip along west property line required because of sign constr~ction above 35' in C i district at 2130 E. 17th - APPROVED. V.A. 2198~ McCormick - construct addition that encroaches into street side yard at 1910 W. St. Andrew Place in R I district - APPROV~D. LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS - Bernstein, 4202 W. Bolsa - ON SALE ~:~:~ TRANSF. PERSON Davis, 1130 S. Bristol - NEW ON SALE R.:,:s Frn-Mar, 4~14 W. Westminster - ON SALE BEEH TRANSF. PERSON The Barrell, 1117 W. 17th - ON SALE R~TEANSF. PERSON The Club House, 914 N. Harbor - 0N SALE BEER TRANSF. PERSON The Intrique, 209 N. Harbor - ON SALE BEE TRANSF. PEP~ON Viviano's Villa, 3601B W. 1st - ON SALE BEER & WINE T~ANSF. PERSON AUDITOR'S REPORT - Submitted by Diehl, Ev-~ & Co. for the quarter ended September 30, 1965. PUC - Application of Greyhound Lines for authority to adopt relocated segments of California Highway 22 between Long Beach and Santa Ama. N. MAIN STREET - Commwnication from Sally Shops suggesting a bridge be erected across the freeway between 17th and the City of Orange; creation of east/west street from Parker to Fashion Square/Fashion Lane, bridging the Santa Aha Freeway and continuing the newstreettoMem~ry Lane. AMBULANCE CHARGES - Communication from Mrs. Aleda J. Rouw regarding ambulance service charges. JOINT POWERS - Chamber of C~mmerce crmm-mication expressing support in principle of the Joint Powers Agreement prepared by County Counsel and reviewed by City Attorney. TAXI PERMITS It was moved by Counc/]-~u Brooks, seconded by Counci]w~n McMichael, that the Yellow Cab Company be ~formed they do not need action from Council regarding license permits for twelve additional taxis; that Council deny loading zones as requested; and deny reconsideration of the permit fee. Mr. Hal Winter, Downtown Santa Ann Association, stated the Association has taken into consideration a study into the need of taxis in the downtown area and submitted a letter urging that the City Council approve, on a 6 month trial basis, taxicab stands within the central core area not to exceed two locations. The original motion was withdrawn. It was moved by Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman McMichael and carried, that the request to reconsider the license fees at this time be denied. CITY COUNCIL - 435 - January 3, 1966 It was moved by CoLulcilm~n ~rooks, seconded by Cou~lcJlrm~n McMichael and carried, that the request from Yellow Cab Co. regarding loading zones be referred to staff for study in conj~uction with the Downtown Santa Aha Association and a report and recommendation be returned to Council. JOINT POWERS The City Manager submitted to the Council a draft of a Joint Powers Agreement for the Civic Center and pointed out differences between it and that prepared by the County Counsel. In the discussion that followed, it was suggested by Council that terms of office of governing board members be limited, the number of members might be increased, that the Commission request rather than require personnel from participating agencies. Counc~lm~u Gilmore asked for a very positive legal opinion from the City Attorney regarding the C~aission's power to apply for federal funds. Mr. Tom Sweeney, President of the Santa Ana Chamber of Co~saerce, spoke in support of the agreement and urged Council make their position clear as soon as possible. Mrs. Janice Boer, 912 N. Lowell, commented this nullified the Charter and was to the disadvantage of the voter who would have nothing to say. Mr. Cliff Fraizer, 20h9 S. Ealliday, voiced opposition to forming any other agency. Madelyn Cenkar, 806 S. Flintridge Drive, asked if the taxpayers were not going to have voice in where their money was spent. On motion of Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman McMichael and carried, Council directed the Attorney and Manager to prepare a counter proposal incorporating the ideas expressed by Council, discuss it with the County Counsel for his opinion and call a special meeting in order that by January 17, 1966 should Council wish to do so it could approve an agreement. It was agreed that the Council would meet on this matter at 2:00 p.m., January 10, 1966; that copies of the agreement should be in hands of Council and County Counsel prior to January 10th; and that County Counsel should be invited to attend the January loth meeting. RECESS At 4:45 p.m. a five minute recess was declared. The Council reconvened at ~:55 p.m. with all Councilmen present. GENEP~L PLAN The Manager discussed with Council procedures they might follow in consideration of the General Plan, noting that at least one public hearing was required. He suggested the Council hold a study session prior to the public hearing. It was moved by Counctlm~u Herrin, seconded by Councilman Burk and carried, that the Council hold a study session on the General Plan at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 25th in the Spurgeon Room at the Santa Aha Library. F~fH & ROSS The Manager informed Council of PROPERTIES his plan to bring to them at their next meeting a reccmmendation for the purchase of properties on both sides of Fifth Street adjacent to Ross Street in the location proposed by the General Plan for the street to Join Fourth and Sixth Streets. CIT~ COUNCIL - ~36 - January 3~ 1966 CITY HALL A~NEX The Manager reported to Council on the opportunity to purchase the property now occupied by Pep Boys Store, adjacent to the City Hall and on the need for additional space. Councilman Markel suggested a new City Hall be built rather than buy more property. The Council agreed the Manager should look into it but with the possibility of a lease rather than purchase. DOWNTOWN PARKING Hal Winter~ Downtown Santa Ann DISTRICT Association, requested the Council employ an attorney for the formation of the parking district in the Central Business District. On motion of CouncilmAn Burk~ seconded by Coullc~lman Brooks and carried Council instructed the City Attorney to employ special counsel for the preparation of documents leading toward creation of the district. HARBOR DISTRICT Mayor Harvey informed Council the Attorney General opinion regarding the legality of the Orange County Harbor District had been received and copies were distributed to Council. CounciLman Markel requested advice frc~ the City Attorney regarding the method of circulating a petition for withdrawal from the District. Janice Boer, 912 North Lowell, commented on the opinion and noted the City could request the Local Agency Formation Commission to call an election regarding withdrawal; also dissolution of the District could be considered. RECESS At 5:~5 p.m. the meeting was recessed to 7:30 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, with all Council- men present. Follow'nE the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the Invocation was delivered by the Reverend AbrahamRynbrandt, Parkview Reformed Church. RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL TEAMONWINNING T~ CALIFORNIA I~TERSCHOLASTIC FEDERATION FOOTBALLCNAMPIONSHIPwas read hy title. It was moved by Co~ncitma~ Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Markel that further readi~gbe waived and the Resolution be adopted. On roll call vote: AYES, COUNC II.A~EN: NOES, COUNCILMEN: ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: GiLmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin, Markel, McMichael, Harvey None None NEARING - Hearing was opened on Amendment A.A. 570 - SERNA Application 570 filed by Joe L. Serna proposing the amendment of Sectional District Map 16-5-10 by reclassifying from the R 2 to the C I district property on the northwest corner of Newhope and McFadden. Planning Cc~mission Resolution 5757 recommended denial. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing had been published December 18, 1965 and affidavit of publication was on file, and that no written comunications had been received. Mr. Robert Rickles, attorney for the applicant, stated the applicant at the last Planning Comission hearing had requested the application be changed to a request for C 5 rather than C l; that this Was highest and best use not in conflict with General Plan; there were precedents set in the area by allowing service stations close by; that there had been approvals such as this since Study 19~ that it would not produce increased traffic; that it would not be incompatible with the neighborhood; that it would not decrease property values. He also stated that the applicant dedicated 20' on McFadden and 20' on Newhope to the City and presented a plot plan as suggested by the planning Commission. CITY COUNCIL - ~37 - January 3, 1966 The Planning Director, in answer to Councilman Gilmore's question regarding the change fro~ C 1 to C 5 and the dedications said that the Ccm~ission had rejected C 5; that had a proposal for R i for the corner service station site been included, the station could have ~eehl :~m&iti~aeel .~ .varianCes: ~Jm~-~eEa,~.~to the dedication, the Planning Director explained the Comm~ission's problem that when a picture and statements are submitted by the applicant, the Commission has no legal way to assure residents surrounding the area that what is proposed will be done. That after the applicant made these things occur the Cam~ission still was of a majority opinion that it was not proper place for commercial zone. Mr. Del Michael, 917 S. To]and, representing the Southwest Santa Ana Homeowners Association, spoke in opposition to the amendment application, noting there had been no cc~mercial zoning on this street within ½ mile since the residential area was built. There beimg no further testimony, the hearing was closed. Councilman McMichael related the history of the area since annexation, noting the residents in the area requested a special study and the Commission and Council adopted Special Study 19 which is still operating. Councilman McMichael requested that any changes be made by special study or general plan rather than spot zoning. It was moved by Councilmsn McMichael, seconded by Councilman Brooks that the decision of the Planning Commission be upheld and Amendment Application 570 be denied. The motion was adopted on roll call vote: AYES, C0UNCII/4EN: NOES, C OUNC ~: ABSENT, COUNCII~EN: Brooks, Markel, McMichael, Harvey Gilmore, Bu_rk, Herrin None NEARING - Hearing was opened on Amendment A.A. 571 - PLANNING Application 571'initiated by the CO~[ISSION Planning C~ission proposing the amendment of Sectional District Map lO-5-10 by reclassifying from the R 2 to the R 2 B district property on the east and west sides of Figmeroa between Hazard and First. Planning Commission Resolution 5760 recommended approval. The Clerk reported thatnotice of the hearing was published December 18, 1965, affidavit of publication was on file~ and that no written communications had been received. There being no response to the Mayor's call for testimony, the hearing was closed. On motion of Councilman Markel, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, Council approved the reclassification and instructed the City Attorney to prepare an amending ordinance according to Exhibit AA 571 A. HEARING - Hearing was opened on Amendment A.A. 572 - CORRY Application 572 filed by Rosabelle Corry proposing the amendment of Sectional District Map 15-5-10 by reclassifying from R l, R i B and C 2 districts to the C i district property on the west side of Feirview between First and Camile. Planning Commission Resolution 5758 recommended approval of Exhibit B which would reclassify to the C 5 and R i B districts. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published December 18, 196~ and no written communications had been received. Mr. Roger McCune, 1505 E. 17th, representing Mrs. Corry, explained to Council that a shopping center was proposed for the property thus serving approximately 850 mobile homes nearby. Mrs. Corry submitted a petition to Council favoring theshopping center from residents in the area. On motion of Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, Council ordered the petition filed. Mr. Del Michael, 917 S. Toland, asked if there were any plans or intentions to hold Fairview as a commercial street and the Planning Director replied in the negative. There being no further testimony~ the hearing was closed. CIT~ COUNCIL - 438 - January 3, 1966 It was moved by Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councdlm~n Bmrk and carried, that Council approve the reclassification and in~ruct the City Attorney to prepare an amending ordinance according to Exhibit AA 572 B. NEARING - Hearing was opened on Amendment A.A. 574 - Application 574 filed by Harold SEGERSTROM Segerstrcm proposing the amend- ment of Sectional District Map 26-5-10 by reclassii~ying from R i and R ~ to the C 4 district property on the west side of Bristol between Segerstrom and Alton. Planning Resolution 5759 recommended approval. Mr. Ted Adsit, Planning Consultant for applicant, stated the owners of the property did not object to it being placed Lu CR zone when new CR zoning is adopted. There being no further testimony, the hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilman B~rk, seconded by Councilman Gilmore amd carried, that Council approve the reclassification and instruct the City Attorney to prepare an amending ordinance according to E~hibit AA 574 A. HEARING - Hearing was opened on Appeal 171 APPEAL 171 - BIRD filed by Donald M. Bird fram C.U.P. 209 the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Use Permit 209 to construct a 28½' high electrical advertising sign at 1625 E. 17th in C 5 district. The Clerk reported that notices were mailed on December 28, 1965, and no written communications had been received. Mr. Edward Agnew, Santa Aha Neon Sign Company, displayed pictures of the proposed sign and area where sign was to be located. He stated the main objection by the Planning Co~mission was that the sign was a billboard. He also stated in this district a 35' sign is allowed and that Mr. Bird was not buying the sign but leasing for five years. Mr. Donald M. Bird, applicant, expressed to Council that a precedent was not being set in the area because the zoning allowed this type of sign; the owner of the property approved this type of sign. The only reason for the conditional use permit is because the business will be located 20' from the sign and it is therefore classified as a billboard. Mr. George Glass, Keystone Investment Company, owners of the building Mr. Bird is leasing, spoke in opposition to the sign stating it would mar the attractiveness of the building; that there are 30 tenants none of whom have out of proportion signs; that developers on 17th have built traditional style buildings for professions. Mr. Egon Gardner, 1601 E. 17th, told Council when he sold the lot he did not understand that there were going to be any big signs put up, and he is not in favor of high-rise signs in area. Mr. Don Gittleson, 13572 Emperor Drive, developer of homes at 19th and Mabury, objected to the sign because it would affect the beauty of the area. Mr. Bird and Mr. Agnew spoke in rebuttal saying this sign would not detract from the beauty of the area; that it could be lowered and conditions met. Mr. Ron Elleboudt, owner of the lot, stated he doubted this sign would be alone for more than a year. There being no further testimony, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director reported this is not an on-site accessory sign by definition so it is classified as a billboard; that the owners along East Seventeenth have imposed voluntarily upon themselves sign restrictions, that the two exceptions -- the OJeda sign was granted by variance and the Quill sign was illegally constructed; that the City has a minimum sign control ordinance. CITY COUNCIL - 439 - January 3, 1966 It was moved by Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman McMichael that Council uphold the action of the Planning Commission and deny Conditional Use Permit 209. On roll call vote: AYES, COUNCILMEN: NOES, COUNC IR4EN: ABSENT, COUNC IkMEN: Brooks, Markel, McMichael, Harvey Gilmore, Burk, Herrin None NEARING - Hearing was opened on proposed ST. VAC. vacation of portion of right of way on north side of Chestnut, west of Grand. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published December 18, 1965 and posted in the area on December 22, 1965, and that no written c~mmunications had been received. There being no testimony, the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION 66-7 ORDERING VACATION OF A PORTION OF CHESTNUT A~ WEST OF GRAND AVENUE was read by title. It was moved by Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Herrin that further reading be waived and Resolution 66-7 be adopted. Om roll call vote: AYES, COUNCILMEN: NOES, COUNCILMEN: ABSENT, COUNC IL~EN: Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin, Markel, McMichael, Harvey None None SURPLUS PROPERTY Council discussed Surplus Property KING & 10TH STS. Report 61-65 and their prior action on property at ~ and 10th Streets, possible lot splits for the property am~ adjacent property dedicated for street purposes on which there is a title cloud. It was moved by Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilm-u Burk that the property described im Report 61-65 be declared surplus, auction date be set for 2:00 p.m. March 7, 1966, with minimum price of $16,400; that the City effect the most advantageous lot split with the condition as it exists to increase the value of the property, and advertise for sale as lots l, 2, 3- Mr. E. Zweig, 1102 N. King, asked how the value of the property was determined and the Manager replied it was partially from Mr. Zweig's appraisers on his property. The motion was adopted. TENT. PARCEL MAP 443 be withdrawn. Mr. Arthur B. Knight, owner of property in Tentative Parcel Map 443, south side of Chestnut, east of Grand, requested the map It was moved by Counc~lm-u Brooks, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, that Tentative Parcel Map 443 be withdrawn as requested by applicant. SOLICITATION It was moved by Councilm-~ Nerrin, seconded by Coancilma~. Burk and carried, that the request frcm Santiago Girl Scout Council for permission to conduct Cookie Sale February 12 through 19, 1966 and frcm March 18 through 26; also Calendar Sale November 4 through 26, 1966, he granted. CITY COUNCIL - 440 - January 3, 1966 LrNDERGR0%rND UTILITIES It was moved by Counc~lm~n Brooks, COMMITTEE seconded by Councilman Markel and carried, that Counc~lm-n McNichael be authorized to attend a meeting of the League of California Cities Committee on Underground Utilities in Berkeley on January lb, 1966, at City expense. YOUTH PROJECTS It was moved by Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Gilmore and carried, that the c~unication from Mr. Thomas Crockett, Orange County Anti-Poverty Council regarding solicitation for neighborhood and area projects for youth, he referred to the City Manager to furnish information about solicitations. AIRLINES It was moved by Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, that the cr~.munication from Urbanus Associates, Civic Consultants~ requesting the P.U.C. grant direct airline service from Orange County Airport to San Francisco and Sacramento, be ordered filed. MAYWOOD ST. VACATION Maywood Avenue in Tract 3236, be referred to It was moved by Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Nerrin and carried~ that the request from John B. Ki]-roy Company to vacate staff. SALARY INCREASES It was moved by Counc~lm-n Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, that the Manager's report dated 12-27-65 rec~mm~ending salary increases for meritorious service, be approved. ADJel' At 10:10 p.m., there being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned to 2:00 p.m., January 10, 1966 in the Council Chamber on motion of Councilmau Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Brooks and carried. DORIS M. BROWN CT.W~K OF THE COUNCIL CITT C0~NCIL - 441 - January 3, 1966