HomeMy WebLinkAbout23A - REJECT BID MAIN ST REHAB
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
~
~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
JULY 19, 2004
TITLE:
APPROVED
REJECTION OF BIDS FOR MAIN
STREET REHABILITATION BETWEEN
EDINGER AND COLUMBINE AVENUES
(PROJECT 1757)
0 As Recommended
0 As Amended
0 Ordinance on 1st Reading
0 Ordinance on 2nd Reading
0 Implementing Resolution
0 Set Public Hearing For
,
~a
CITY MANAGER
CONTINUED TO
I'
/~
-----
FILE NUMBER
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Reject all bids
Columbine Avenues.
for
Main
Street
Rehabilitation between
Edinger
and
DISCUSSION
The segment of Main Street between Edinger and Columbine Avenues has been
identified as a high priority on the City's Pavement Management System.
The pavement is deteriorating due to weather, age and heavy usage. Some
of the adjacent curbs, gutters, sidewalks and driveway approaches are
also in various states of disrepair and require replacement.
This project provides for construction of new street pavement,
replacement of damaged concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, cross gutters,
driveway approaches and curb ramps. This project also includes
construction of colored sidewalk and planting of new trees between
Edinger and Warner Avenues.
The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on June 4 and 7, 2004, and bids
were opened on June 25, 2004. A summary of the bid invitations mailed,
the bids received, and the bid results follows.
Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices:
Contractors requesting bidding documents:
Bids received:
Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors:
11
8
5
0
23A-1
Project 1757
Main Street Rehabilitation between
Edinger and Columbine Avenues
July 19, 2004
Page 2
NAME OF BIDDER
CITY
BID AMOUNT
1. Sequel Contractors, Inc.
2. Elite Bobcat Service, Inc.
3. Excel Paving Company
4. R.J. Noble Company
Santa Fe Springs
Corona
Long Beach
Orange
$2,995,282.72
$3,034,146.03
$3,034,275.53
$3,131,419.24
A total of 5 bids were received and all but one were responsive. All
American Ashpalt did not submit any Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
(DBE) information as required by the bidding documents and therefore,
its bid is considered non-responsive. The lowest responsive bid of
$2,995,282.72 was submitted by Sequel Contractors, Inc., which is above
the Engineer's estimate of $2,500,000. Staff recommends rejection of all
bids in order to consider design alternatives to meet the available
budget. The project will be re-advertised for bids after the revision is
completed.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
~ ~/C/-
James G. Ros
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
K:\Construction\RFCA-draft\1757 2004-07-19 reject 180 WD
23A-2