Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-03-1972MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA January 3, 1972 The meeting was called to order at 2:05 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall Annex, 530 North Ross Street, with the following Councilmen present: Vernon S. Evans, Wade Herrin, J. Ogden Markel, Harry K. Yamamoto, and Mayor Lorin Griset. Councilman Ray Villa arrived at 2:10 P. M., and Council- man Jerry Patterson at 2:15 P.M. Also present were City Manager Carl J. Thornton, City Attorney James Withers, Director of Planning Herbert Wieland, Director of Public Works Ronald Wolford, and Clerk of the Council Florence I. Malone. MINUTES on motion of Councilman Evans, unanimously carried. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 20, 1971, were approved as submitted, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto~ and CONSENT CALENDAR The following'Agenda items were removed from the Consent Calendar: Items 2-E~ 9-A, 10-B and 13-C requested by Councilman Markel; Item 5 requested by Councilman Yamamoto. Councilman Villa arrived at 2:10 P.M. On motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto~ and unanimously carried, Council affirmed the recommended action on the following Consent Calendar items: BID CALLS Approved plans and specifications and authorized advertisement for bids on the following: SPEC. 641-270 - Five each, High Band Mobile Radios; three radios for Recreation & Parks Department, added units; two radios for Public Works Department, replacements; opening date February 4, 1972. SPEC. 641-271 - Clothing racks and bags for swimming pools; opening date January 24, 1972. SPEC. 641-272 - 735 5-gallontrees for various new subdivisions; opening date January 24, 1972. CITY COUNCIL -1- January 3, 1972 CONSENT CALENDAR - (Continued) BID AWARDS Awarded contracts as follows: PROJECT 7023 - Replace pump at Well 13; awarded contract to Orange County Pump Co. , Santa Ana, on the basis of low bid; and rejected all other bids. SPEC. 641-266 - Fire Hose: 900' - 3" hose; 1550' - 2 1/2" hose; 1700' - 1 1/2" hose; awarded contract to Herb D. Porter, Huntington Beach on the basis of low bid; and rejected all other bids. SPEC. 641-267 - Fire Hose: 800' - 4" hose; awarded contract to The American Rubber Mfg. Co., Santa Fe Springs, on the basis of low bid; and rejected all other bids. SPEC. 641-268 - One (1) concrete routing and joint-cleaning machine; awarded contract to the Tennant Company, Los Angeles on the basis of low bid; and rejected all other bids. TRAFFIC December 29, 1971, inclusive. Received and ordered filed report of control devices removed or installed from December 17 to VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Received and ordered filed the following applications: VA 71-55, HENRY G. FELT - To construct a 28-unit apartment development in the R 1 District at 701 S. Sullivan Street; APPROVED. VA 71-58, SANTA ANA MEDICAL ARTS, INC. - To build second story additions to existing one-story medical suites at 1125 & 1207 East 17th Street; APPROVED. VA 71-61, ORVILLE M. & THELMA MILLIKEN - To construct a comrre rcial building for Orco Alarm Systems in the R 1 District at 514 South Lyon Street; APPROVED. EX 71-15, JOSEPH AND GALE VERDULT - To enclose an existing breezeway between the house and a garage which is within 8' of the rear property line in the R 1 District at 1743 W. Marcella Lane; APPROVED. DEEDS WITH CASH GRANTEE, CITY the following purchases: Approved deeds and authorized the Mayor to sign all necessary documents in connection with GISH, north side of Seventeenth, east of Jefferson, Street purposes; PAMPLIN, north side of Seventeenth, east of Jefferson, Street purposes. CITY COUNCIL -2- - January 3, 1972 CONSENT CALENDAR - (Continued) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS Approved the following maps subject to conditions contained in Planning Director's report, and waived the alley requirement for #729 and #730; TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #727 - Filed byM.P.G. Ranch creating seven (7) M 1 parcels for industrial use, located generally on the west side of Ritchey Street, north of Maywood Avenue. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #729 - Filed by Sandman Motels creating two (2) C 1 parcels, one to be used for a motel and one for a restaurant, located generally on the north side of First Street, 814' west of Tustin Avenue. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #730 - Filed by Rand Hawaii, Ltd., creating three (3) C 2 parcels, two to be used for restaurants and the third for commercial purposes, located generally on the northeast corner of Bristol Street and Central Avenue. REIMBURSEMENTS Authorized the following reimbursements: HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, for street purposes at the northeast corner of Seventeenth Street and Grand Avenue in exchange for ultimate dedication on both streets, NS-1041, in the amount of $18,190.02. E.R. ALLISON, for street improvements on the east side of Grand Avenue from 568' to 748' north of Seventeenth Street in exchange for ultimate dedication on Grand Avenue, VA 70-7, RS~825, in the amount of $3,278.36. BID AWARD the following contract: On motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried, Council awarded SPEC. 641-269 - One (1) Tennant Model 86 power sweeper; awarded contract to the Tennant Company, Los Angeles, on the basis of low bid; and rejected all other bids. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE Councilman Herrin's motion to LICENSE APPLICATIONS receive and file the following Alcoholic Beverage License Applications was seconded by Councilman Evans: ENCORE ROOM, 5021 W. Edinger Avenue, On Sale Beer & Wine, Person to Person Transfer; CITY COUNCIL -3- January 3, 1972 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS - (Continued) Motion BAJA, S.A., 2711 S. Bristol, On Sale Beer, Original Person Application for existing licensed premises; LASANTILLAS MARKET NO. 1, 421 E. McFadden Street, Off Sale Beer & Wine, Person to Person Transfer; GALAXY, 900 N. Broadway, On Sale General, Person to Person Transfer; THE ELBOW ROOM, 321 E. 17th Street, On Sale General, Person to Person Transfer; THE RED BARON, 1815 South Main Street, On Sale Beer, Person to Person Transfer. carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Herrin, Evans, Villa, Griset, Markel Yamamoto Patterson DEEDS On motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Evans~ Council received and ordered filed report of No-Cash Deeds accepted by the City Manager pursuant to Resolution #69-156 from December 15 through December 28, 1971, inclusive. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Herrin, Evans, NOES: None ABSENT: Patterson Villa, Griset, Yamamoto, Markel Councilman Patterson arrived at 2:15 P. M. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP approved the following map: On motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Herrin, and unanimously carried, Council TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #728 - Filed byW.J. Larder creating four (4) R 1 parcels, use not known at this time, located generally on the south side of Edinger Avenue, 400' west of South Pacific Avenue. REIMBURSEMENT authorized the following reimbursement: On motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Patterson, and unanimously carried, Council LUCAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, for water main installed in Tract 7170 adjacent to ~%Vestwood Park, W.O. in the amount of $1, 881.46. 52051, CITY COUNCIL -4- January 3, 1972 READING WAIVED On motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Patterson, and unanimously carried, the full reading of ordinances and resolutions, the titles of which appeared on the public Agenda, was w~ived. ORD. NS-1106 ORDINANCE NS-1106 CHANGING A.A. #693 ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON CAL-PENN LAND CO. AMENDMENT APPLICATION 693 FILED BY CAL-PENN LAND COMPANY AND AMENDING SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 17-5-10 (EXHIBIT 693-A) was passed to second reading on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Council- man Evans, and carried on a 6-1 vote, Councilman Yamamoto voting NO. RES.. 72-1 RESOLUTION 72-1 OVERRULING EX 71-14 THE DECISION OF THE ZONING ROLAND FRANK GONZALES ADMINISTRATOR AND APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION 71-14 FILED BY ROLAND FRANK GONZALES was adopted on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Patterson, and unanimously carried. RES. 72-2 RESOLUTION 72-2 OVERRULING VA 71-48 THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING ROBERT H. GRANT COMPANY COMMISSION AND CONDITIONALLY GRANTING VA 71-48 FILED BY ROBERT H. GRANT COMPANY was adopted on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Patterson, and carried on a 6-1 vote, Councilman Yamamoto voting NO. RES. 72-3 RESOLUTION 72-3 APPROVING STREET VACATION MAP AND DECLARING INTENTION GRAND AND McFADDEN TO VACATE A PORTION OF GRAND AVENUE NORTH OF McFADDEN AVENUE was adopted on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Villa, and unanimously carried. RES. 72-4 RESOLUTION 72-4 APPROVING STREET VACATION MAP AND DECLARING INTENTION ALLEY AT WARNER & BRISTOL TO VACATE ALLEY SOUTH OF WARNER AND EAST OF BRISTOL STREET RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY was adopted on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried. RES. 72-5 On motion of ~Councilman Herrin, PARKING ON WASHINGTON AVE. seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried, Council postponed consideration of RESOLUTION 72-5 ESTABLISHING LEFT TURN POCKETS AND CERTAIN CURBSIDE PARKING CONDITIONS ON WASHINGTON AVENUE FROM CITY COUNCIL -5- January 3, 1972 RES. 72-5, PARKING ON WASHINTON AVE. - (Continued) BUSH STREET TO LINCOLN AVENUE, to the regular meetir~g of January 17, 1972, at the request of the Director of Public Works. RES. 72-9 RESOLUTION 72-9 DECLARING ANNEXATION THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY SANTA CLARA AND WRIGHT N.E. DESIGNATED "SANTA CLARA AND WRIGHT N.E. ANNEX" TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, was adopted on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried. WATER UTILITY FUND On the unanimously carried motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Evans, Council received and ordered filed financial statement of Water Utility Fund for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1971, submitted by City's auditors, Diehl, Evans and Company. GENERAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT Councilman Markel stated that he had not had an opportunity to study in detail the General Financial Statement for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1971, submitted by the City's auditors, Diehl, Evans and Company, and moved to continue the matter to the regular meeting of January 17, 1972. Motion was seconded by Councilman Herrin, and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Markel, Herrin, Griset, Patterson Villa, Evans, Yamamoto None PARKING RESTRICTIONS Report of traffic and parking conditions on Flower Street between First Street and Seventeenth Street was set for public hearing on February 7, 1972, on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried. STREET LIGHTING Report and recommendation for BROOK STREET lighting in the area of 1649 Brook Street were approved on the unanimously carried motion of Councilman Markel, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto. CHANGES IN TRASH RATES Councilman Patterson moved to AND REGULATIONS remove from the table the motion to adopt Ordinance NS-1093, which had been tabled at the December 20 meeting. Motion was seconded by Councilman Yamamoto and carried on a 6-1 vote, Councilman Markel dissenting. CITY COUNCIL -6- January 3, 1972 CHANGES IN TRASH RATES AND REG~ULATIONS - (Continued) Following discussion of size of required trash bins, the property owners' right to request a waiver of this requirement if there is insufficient space for a large bin, and the right of appeal to Council in the event of denial of a waiver by the Director of Public Works, ORDINANCE NS-1093 AMENDING THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 16-33 AND SECTION 16-34 THEREOF PERTAINING TO REFUSE COLLECTION REGULATIONS was adopted on motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Villa, and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Villa, Evans, Griset, Yamamoto Herrin, Markel None RESOLUTION 72-7 ESTABLISHING REVISED SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR REFUSE COLLECTION was adopted on motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Villa, and unanimously carried; with the provision that the resolution will be amended by addition of the following clause: "The requirement for mandatory container rental may be waived for apartment buildings existing on January 1, 1972, upon a finding by the Director of Public Works that no space is available for such container within the boundary lines of the apartment property. In no case, however, shall container locations be considered in the front yard setback or within areas required for meeting the minimum off-street parking requirements of applicable zoning regulations. Any applicant Who has been denied a waiver by the Director of Public Works may appeal such action to the City Council by filing within 30 days aft~ such/d~ia],~ a ii~ritten' 'statemelit_0f; hi~ r~asonh'why the City Council should reverse the action from which the appeal is taken." and waiver provisions as outlined below: Residence Type Monthly Monthly Cost per Unit Total Cost Single Family $ 1.30 $ 1.30 Duplex ,]. 05 2.10 Triplex 0.97 2.. 90 4 Units 0.97 3.88 5 Units 0.97 4.85 6 Units -0. 97 5.82 7 Units 0.97 6.79 8 Units 0.97 7.76 9 Units & Up 0.97 8.73 and up RESOLUTION 72-8 AMENDING SECTION 3OF RESOLU~iiION NO..58-281 BY DELETING THE CLASS TITLE OF SANITATION INSPECTOR AND ADDING THE CLASSES OF SANITATION INSPECTOR I AND SANITATION INSPECTOR II was adopted on motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Villa, and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Villa, Griset, Yamamoto Evans, Herrin, Markel None CITY COUNCIL -7- January3, 1972 CHANGES IN TRASH RATES AND REGULATIONS - (Continued) Prior to making the motion, Councilman Patterson stated he had requested rand this Resolution had been placed on the Agenda again at his request, since the City Manager had recommended approval, motion to adopt had failed on a tie vote at the December 6 meeting, and he wished to have it reconsidered by the full Council. Councilman Markel asked if the Sanitation Inspectors would have police power, and the City Attorney stated they would be able to issue citations, but not make arrests. Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Cound{i'r~an Yamamoto, to approve Classification Specifications for Sanitation Inspector I and Sanitation Inspector II, carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Yamamoto, Villa, Griset Evans, Herrin, Markal None RECESS At 2:35 P.M. a recess was declared. The meeting reconvened at 2:50 P. M. with all Councilmen present. WAGE AND SALARY The matter of wage and salary ADJUSTMENTS adjustments for the Police and Fire Departments was set for public hearing on January 17, 1972, on the unanimously carried motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto. SUMMARY OF REFERRALS On motion of Councilman Villa, seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried, Council received and ordered filed report of action items referred to staff which are still pending. Councilman Villa asked for the status of the appraisal on the Willowick Golf Course. Staff reported that the appraisal is in process, but the completion date is not known. Councilman Markel requested more information concerning parking on private property. The City Manager stated that in some instances private parking lots are used by others~ usiag up space that the owner needs for his own automobiles; that the City has an ordinance which allows the Police Department to tow away illegally parked cars~ but consideration is being given to something less drastic. Councilman Markel suggested that the Cultural Heritage Program should be deletdd from the Referral List~ due to lack of interest in the people who have been contacted. Councilmen Markel and Villa questioned the status of the report on the Warner Avenue South Co~nmunity Plan. ~£he City Manager stated that the Planning Department is presently making a full-scale study for the purpose of revising and updating the plan for the Warner Sou~h area. CITY COUNCIL -8- January 3, 1972 SUMMARY OF REFERRALS -(Continued) Councilman Evans made further reference to the Cultural Heritage Program. He requested that a follow-up letter be sent out by the Clerk of the Council, since the original letter went out during the Holiday Season when many of the organizations contacted had other projects to consider, and that perhaps more interest could be generated. The consensus of the Council was that the matter should be followed, and Councilman Patterson requested that it be sent to additional organizations who might be interested. Councilman Markel suggested that the matter of parking meter funds for improvement of lighting in the downtown area adjacent to the Assessment District should be ~teferred for one full year since he could see no results from money spent. The Mayor stated that the method of distribution of expense where the City assumed the responsibility for underground work and the property owners assumed the responsibility for the fixtures themselves makes a very fine partnership and he would be opposed to the suggestion. TRASH PICKUP RATES Mr. Robert Fair, a member of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Apartment House Association, stated that ~the Association had received many calls complaining of the increase in the rate for trash collection, and objecting to being forced to take a trash bin whether they could use it or not; that after reading the ordinance, he understands they are not now being forced to take the bins, and that he believes the charges are fair. He also mentioned the poor pickup service over the past four years and presented a picture of an area taken after ~ trash pickup service. Mrs. Janice Boer, 912 N. Lowell, also spoke to the subject, stating the trash pickup in the City has been quite deplorable; and that the noise has increased considerably. She objected to extension of the contract before it had expired, stating this gives the company a monopoly; that the contract should go out to bid, since where there is no competition, there is no attempt to give service. The City Manager stated that the City of Newport Beach handles trash pickup itself; but that every other city in Orange County, and the County itself, have monopolistic operations; that the prior contractor for Santa Ana bid the first time in 1952 and had his contract extended five times; and that the City went to bid when the demand for an increase in rates was far beyond what was required. BICYCLE LICENSING Councilman Yamamoto stated that a lot of new bicycles were received : by children in the city for Christmas; that he believes it is danger6~s for the children to have to bring the bicycles into the City to be licensed; and asked for a report from staff concerning the possibility of additional locations for registering bicycles. At present, every bicycle must be licensed at City Hall. RECESS At 3:25 P.M., the meeting was recessed to 7:30 P.M., at which time it was reconvened with alt Council members present. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the Invocation was given by the Reverend John Wilker, St. Peter Lutheran Church. CITY COUNCIL -9- January 3, 1972 CERTIFICATE OF PUB LIC The Mayor opened the public hearing CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY on the application filed by Care Convalescent Ambulance, Stanton, to operate one ambulance within the City of Santa Ana. Mr. Elroy Giddons, Attorney, 505 Commonwealth, Fullerton, spoke on behalf of Mr. Carl J. Richardson who operates Care Convalescent Ambulance. He stated that Mr. Richardson has been in business for three years in cities surrounding Santa Ana; that he has a good financial statement; that he operates two units, has a State License, and employs four people; that his business is comprised mostly of Medicare and Medi-Cal,patients and that it sometimes takes as long as six months to receive pay- ment for these services; that other ambulance companies do not like this type of business because of the slow payment; that he is not interested in police calls; that he has a license to operate in Stanton, Garden Grove, Fullerton, and Los Alamitos, and is able to bring patients to Santa Aha hospitals, but cannot return to pick them up when they are ready to go home, andhe cannot come to Santa Ana-to pick up patients who wish to go to the cities where he is licensed. Mr. Joseph T. Klein of Mission Ambulance Service spoke in favor o£ granting the application. He stated there is a need for this type of service in Santa Ana; that some of the ambulance services in the city are interested primarily in emergency work and it is not economically feasible for them to become involved in transporting convalescent patients; that it is a grave injustice that they are allowed to bring patients into Santa Ana but are not allowed to transport those same patients out of the City; that it is common practice for Homes and hospitals to call the ambulance that brought the patient in; that he has heard good comments from rest homes in Santa Ana regarding Care service; that they can offer their service at a lower rate which is advantageous to the patient. Mr. John Morrill, Morgan Ambulance, 1322 N. Sycamore, spoke against granting the application, stating that on emergency service they can collect oniy about 20% of the cost; that the bulk of their income comes from private calls or community calls; that if more companies are allowed in Santa Ana it is not bettering the service, only increasing competition; that the average operator faces a large investment in equipment which only lasts a few years before it has to be replaced; that insurance is expensive and hard to obtain; that telephones and vehicles have to be manned 24 hours a day; that accounts receivables are very high and most result in write-offs; that Medicare and Medi-Cal are the only ones they can collect their money from and it amounts to approximately 50% of their income. There were no further proponents or opponents in the matter. The Clerk reported no written communications had been received, and the Mayor closed the toublic hearing. Councilman Patterson stated that he represents Morgan Ambulance Company; that he did not know a representative of that company would be speaking to the matter, and that since Mr. Mori~ill was present in that regard, he felt there was a conflict of interest, and would abstain from voting. The City Attorney agreed that there was a clear enough conflict of interest not to require the Councilman's vote on the matter. Councilman Patterson stepped down. The Mayor stated he would not be in favor of granting this application because it had not been proven to him that more ambulances were needed in Santa Ana. CITY COUNCIL -10- January 3~ 1972 CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY - (Continued) Councilman Yamamoto stated that Mr. Morrill of Morgan Ambulance had spoken against allowing another ambulance service in the City, but that he believed any type of business would attempt to keep competition out of the City. Councilman Herrin stated that if conditions are as bad as suggested by Mr. Morrill he would not imagine that anyone would want to conduct such a business in Santa Aha, and that he did not believe the Council could hold jurisdiction in this matter; ~that this is in the area of giving everyone fair treatment. In response to Councilman Villa's question as to how a need is established, the Mayor stated he believed that if there is a deficiency in ambulance service in the City of Santa Ana, it will come to the Council's attention very quickly. Councilman Villa again asked what criteria is used in establishing a need for the service, and stated that he did not believe the application should be denied on this basis. The City Manager stated that the ordinance covering this type of service requires a determination that there is a necessity created by demand; that there are too many ambulances operating in the CRy at the present time, and if the portion of their business which is the most assured portion of the payment is taken away from them, there is difficulty in making the remainder of the business operate on a profitable basis; that they may not be willing to respond to police calls if this happens. Councilman Herrin's motion, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, to grant the request and issue a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Care Convalescent Ambulance to do business and to operate one ambulance within the City of Santa Ana, failed on the following roll call vote: AYES: Herrin, Yamamoto, Villa NOES: Evans, Griset, Markel ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: Patterson A.A. #690 The Mayor opened the public hearing HAROLD T. SEGERSTROM on Amendment Application #690 filed AND HOWARD BEAR by Harold T Segerstrom & Howard Bear to rezone property located on the west side of Plaza Drive between Sunflower Avenue (Wakeham Avenue) and MacArthur Boulevard, from R 1 to R 4 District. Mr. Greg Butcher, 3315 Fairview Road, Costa Mesa, representing the Segerstrom Corporation, stated that the development proposed for this property represents a high-qUality, adult-only development; that the density requested of approximately 24 units per acre is necessary to support the quality and uniqueness of the design; that the apartments will range from 600 to 1300 square feet and the rental range will be from $150 to $350 per month; that it would be a combination of two and three story units, with the three story unit~s loo~ing irr~vard, and the two-story id the outside;' that they are requesting a higher density becadse they feel it' is:necessary to the ~lesign and quality of the development; CITY COUNCIL -11- January 3, 1972 A.A. #690, HAROLD T. SEGERSTROM AND HOWARD BEAR - (Continued) There were no further proponents or opponents in this matter, and the Clerk reported no written communications had been received. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Councilman Markel moved to approve Amendment Application 690, and to pass to second reading ORDINANCE NS-1104 CHANGING ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON AMENDMENT APPLICATION 690 FILED BY HAROLD T. SEGERSTROM AND HOWARD BEAR AND AMENDING SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 35-5-10(EXHIBIT A,A. 690-A). Motion was seconded by Councilman Herrin, and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Markel, Herrin, Villa, Evans, None None Griset, Yamamoto, Patterson A.A. #694 The Mayor opened the public hearing C.B. KNICKERBOCKER, ET AL on Amendment Application 694 filed by C.B. Knickerbocker, et al, to rezone property located on the west side of Bush Street between Washington and Eleventh Streets, from P District to C 2 District. The Director of Planning stated that staff recommended denial of this zone change because the present P zone on Bush Street provides a buffer for the commercial along Main Street and the residential uses to the east; but that the Planning Commission felt the rezoning would not be detrimental to the General Plan and recommended approval. The applicant, Mr. C.B. Knickerbocker, stated that a development company has an option on the property but is unable to obtain a loan unless it is rezoned; thkt the C 2 zoning being requested is less restrictive than the C 3 zone which is immediately to the north of his property. There were no further proponents or opponents and the Clerk reported no written communications had been received. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Councilman Patterson stated he concurred with the staff recommendation for denial; that perhaps a variance techhique could be used, but he is opposed to granting azone change; that a zone change would not be in the best interests of the City or the property owners. Councilman Yamamoto agreed. Councilman Markel moved to approve Amendment Application 694, and to pass to second reading ORDINANCE NS-1105 CHANGING ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON AMENDMENT APPLICATION 694 FILED BY C.B. KNICKERBOCKER, ET AL AND AMENDING SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 7-5-9 (EXHIBIT A.A. 694-A). Motion was seconded by Councilman Herrin, and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Markel, Herrin, Villa, Evans, Patterson None Griset, Yamamoto CITY COUNCIL -12- January 3, 1972 RECESS present. At 8:45 P~M.,~a recess was declared. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 P.M. with all Councilmen APPEAL #288 The Mayor opened the public hearing CUP 71-34 on Appeal #288 filed by Robert R. ROBERT R. WASHER Washer appealing the requirements for lighting fee, trees, and 4' decorative wall contained in Conditional Use Permit 71-34, approved by the Planning Commission, allowing retail sales in the M 1 District at 3500 W. 17th Street (Westminster). The Director of Public Works stated that Condition 6-D of the Commission report was amended to read" . $1095.00 or subject to review.. "He stated that the bond involved has been recalculated, and for sidewalk and tre~s it would amount to $446.00 and the street lights would be $103.00, for a total of $549.00; that Public Works feels this is a reasonable requirement for any commercial enterprise, and particularly on 17th Street. The Director of Planning stated that the 4' decorative wall is a standard requirement to screen parking, and that staff feels the requirement is reasonable and should be retained. Robert R. Washer, 12615 Lighthouse,Lane, Corona del Mar, stated he had come before the Council because his neighbor to the east had not been required to comply with the same conditions, and he was asking for the same consideration to be given to him. He presented pictures of the two properties. He also stated that the Planning Commission had stipulated that there would be no curbside parking along Seventeenth Street in front of his building, but there is parking in front of the office next to his. There were- no further proponents or opponents and the Clerk reported no written communication had been received on the matter. The Mayor closed the public hearing~ In discussing the "No Parking" on 17th Street, the Director of Public Works stated they are trying to warn potential developers that there will be no parking on the major arterial system; that it doesn't mean now, but eventually. Councilman Patterson stated he felt that flue information presented was incomplete and would like to refer the matter to staff for further report. Councilman Herrin's motion, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, to refer Appeal #288 to staff for further information and report on January 17, 1972, carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Herrin, Yamamoto, Villa, Evans, Patterson NOES: Griset, Markel ABSENT: None CITY COUNCIL -13- January 3, 1972 APPEAL #289 The Mayor opened the public hearing VA 71-62 on Appeal #289 filed by Lorraine B. LORRAINE B. ELAM Elam appealing the Planning Commission's denial of VA 71-62 to continue use of rear of property at 5106 West Hazard Avenue for auto reclaiming. The Director of Planning stated that just one year ago Council granted an application for auto dismantling at this location; that the Planning Commission and Planning Staff had recommended denial; that conditions of approval were that the variance was granted for a period of one year; fl~e front portion of the lot was to be landscaped; a driveway was to be constructed of gravel from the front to the garage; and a chain link fence with opaque screening would be provided around the wrecking yard; that the applicant is asking for a renewal and the Planning Commission and Staff unanimously - recommend denial; that the basic question is one of land (~se and planning; that the are is residential with the exception of this property and a small non-conforming use immediately to the east, where there is a battery shop; that the performance during the year the variance has been in effect has not been good; that the Planning Staff is not insensitive to the problems of the applicant, but the solution should not be at the expense of the surrounding property owners. He presented a video tape of the operation which was taken during the month of December, 1971. Mr. Robert Bethea, 13981 Sandhurst Place, spoke on behalf of Mrs. Elam. He stated they are asking for an extension of the variance for a period of approximately three months; that Mr. Ellis, who operates the wrecking yard, has located property in Huntington Beach but must obtain a Conditional Use Permit in order.to conduct his business there; that this procedure is in process at the present time; and that Mr. Ellis needs time to complete arrangements for this new location and.to move his business there. He further stated that Mr. Ellis has reasonably complied with the conditions put forth by the City Council at the time the original variance was granted; that an asphalt driveway was constructed, and an 8' opaque fence was put up around the junk yard area; that the property to the rear of Mr. Ellis's property has been rented to another party and they contribute substantially to the activity; and that they are requestin~ an opportunity for an orderly withdrawal from the property. Mr. A1 Parker, 5023 W. 7th Street, spoke in opposition to the appeal, He presented pictures taken during the day and stated there are more cars in the outside space than a month ago; that the operation in the rear has big trucks loading and unloading the wrecked automobiles, and uses the driveway; that a fence was built but fi': does not screen the wrecking operations. The Rev. Zamora, requested that, if the operation is allowed to continue, they not be allowed to use the driveway next to the battery shop; that they have been bringing in trucks full of autos and have been going through the whole area, using somebody else's property. Mr. James W. Trubey, 801 N. Morse Drive, presented pictures taken about the first of December, stating that the renter has not lived up to the conditions of the variance. In response to a question from Mr. Arnold I-Ioffman, the Mayor stated that if the appeal is granted for 90 days it cannot be extended again. CITY COUNCIL -14- January 3, 1972 APPEAL #289, VA 71-62 - LORRAINE B. ELAM - (Continued) Mr. Robert Arnendarez, 1527 W. 7th Street, and Mr. Will Cross, 923 N. Euclid also spoke against the appeal. There were no further proponents or opponents in the matter and the Clerk reported no written communications had been received. The Mayor closed the public hearing. In response to a question from Councilman yamamoto, the Director of Planning stated that if someone else is operating at the rear of the property, the Planning Staff is not aware of it, and that the variance in question is the only one that has been approved. Councilman Yamamoto stated that the original variance was for one year, yet the tenants made no attempt to find another location before the variance expired. In response to a question from Councilman Evans, Mr. Ellis stated that he wants three months to continue to operate and obtain money to get another place. Councilman Villa moved to grant the appeal and approve Variance Application 71-62 for a three months' period. Councilman Herrin seconded the motion with the provision that the time limit be established definitely at 90 days, or until April 3. Motion carried on fhe following roil call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Villa, Herrin, Griset, Markel Evans, Yamamoto, Patterson None APPEAL #290 The Director of Planning stated that VA 71-54 at the time the Planning Commission HAROLD SEGERSTROM, ET AL heard the rezoning application for the property at 3737 S. Bear Street, they also heard this variance which was filed with a precise plan. He stated that the applicant has appealed the dedication of 120' right-of-way on Bear Street; that at the present time the street is 80' and it will be increased to 100'. The other condition being appealed is that the applicant promises not to protest any future assessment district. The Mayor opened the public hearing on Appeal #290 filed by Harold Segerstrom, et al, and Howard Bear appealing Conditions 6-A(6) and (7) of VA 71-54, approved by the Planning Commission, to construct an 828-unit multiple family apartment project on approximately 33 acres of land in the R 1 District at 3737 S. Bear Street. Mr. Gregory Butcher of the Segerstrom Corporation, stated that they feel a hardship is being imposed by the 120' street dedication requirement; that they are in favor of bicycle paths, but believe more research and study on the subject is necessary. He stated that they have had difficulty in understanding the legal validity o~ the second condition, concerning future assessment districts; and that they will be more than willing to consider specific assessment districts as they may be established in the future. CITY COUNCIL -15 - January3, 1972 APPEAL #290, VA 71-54, HAROLD SEGERSTROM, ET AL - (Continued) There were no further proponents or opponents in the matter, and the Clerk reported no written communications had been received. The Mayor closed the public hearing. In response to questions from the Council, the Planning Director stated that the 120~ width of the street was set to allow for bicycle paths; the City Attorney stated that the condition asking the company not to protest future Assessment Districts is a new one but he knows of no existing law prohibiting it; and questioned the "adults only" restriction. Councilman Evans' motion, seconded by Councilman Villa, to grant the appeal and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution approving Variance Application 71-54 subject to conditions of approval contained in the Commission report, excepting Condition 6-A(7) and modifying Condition 6-A(6) to read" is to be increased to 100'," carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Evans, Villa, Herrin, Griset, Yamamoto, Patterson, Markel None None APPEAL #291 The Mayor opened the public VA 71-63 hearing on Ap~peal #291 filed by ELLIS W. STANLEY Grace Alberts appealing Planning Commission's approval of VA 71-63 filed by Ellis W. Stanley to allow generator rebuilding in the C 2 District at 1112 E. 17th Street; and requesting a change in the wording from "To allow generator rebuilding . . ." to "To allow generator rebuilding of gasoline driven passenger and truck vehicles only. " The Director of Planning stated they have no objection to this tightening up of the condition. Mrs. Grace Alberts, 1135 E. Washington Place, stated that she owns the property that adjoins this commercial zone; that she (floes not want any big generator operation the but if it is automotive she has no objection. Mr. Jerry Obenberg, representing Mr. Stanley, stated that he has no objection basically, only that they do have butane and diesel engines and would like to have the word "gasoline" deleted. Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, to grant the appeal and instruct the City Attorney to prep, are a resolution approving Variance Application 71-63, subject to conditions of approval contained in the Commission report, to allow generator rebuildin§~ of passenger and truck vehicles o~ -, carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Yamamoto, Villa, Evans, Herrin, None None Griset, Markel CITY COUNCIL -16 - January 3, 1972 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE Councilman Yamamoto requested NUMBER staff to investigate the possibility of establishing an emergency telephone number that would be used for all emergencies, rather than having separate numbers for each type of emergency. ADJOURNMENT The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 10:40 P. M. Florence I. Malone Clerk of the Council CITY COUNCIL -17- January 3, 1972