HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-15-1973MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
January 15, 1973
The meeting was called to order at 2:05 P.M. in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall Annex, 530 North Ross Street, with the following Councilmen
present: Wade Herrin, J. Ogden Markel, Ray Villa, Harry K. Yamamoto,
and Mayor Lorin Griset. Councilman Jerry M. Patterson arrived at
2:10 P.M. and Councilman Vernon S. Evans arrived at 7:30 P.M. Also
present were City Manager Bruce C. Spragg, City Attorney James A.
Withers, Director of Planning Charles C. Zimmerman, Director of
Public Works Ronald Wolford, and Clerk of the Council Florence I. Malone.
HOUSING AUTHORITY At 2:07 P.M., Council
recessed to convene the
Housing Authority. The
meeting reconvened at Z:15 P.M. with the same Councilmen present.
MINUTES The Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of January 2, 1973
were approved as submitted,
on motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Herrin, and
unanimously carried.
CONSENT CALENDAR The following Agenda items
were removed from the
Consent Calendar: Item 5 G
requested by Councilman Yamamoto; and Items 3 B and 14 B requested by
Councilman Markel.
On motion of Councilman Villa, seconded by Councilman Patterson, and
unanimously carried, Council affirmed the recommended action on the
following Consent Calendar items:
BID CALLS
for bids on the following:
Approved plans and
specifications, and
authorized advertisement
PROJECT 7028 - Paint Six Million Gallon Tank at West
Station, 207 South Mountain View Street; opening date,
February 13, 1973 at 2:00 P.M.
AGREEMENTS
agreements:
Approved and authorized
the Mayor and Clerk to
execute the following
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT - Agreement to Remove
Encroachment between the City and C. J. Skirvin of
Skirvln Tire Shop to construct a sign at 1226 North Harbor.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 17 JANUARY 15, 1973
CONSENT CALENDAR - (Continued)
EDNA PARK SITE LEASE - between the City and the
Orange County Flood Control District for City lease
of Edna Drive Park Site for 25 years.
TRAFFIC Received and ordered filed
report of control devices
removed or installed
December 27, 1972 through January 10, 1973, inclusive.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
LICENSE APPLICATIONS
Received and ordered filed
the following Alcoholic
Beverage License Applications:
BAGSTAD, Eldon W., southwest corner of
First and Harbor, Off Sale General, Original;
FRANK'S ENTERPRISES, 150 MacArthur, Off
Sale General Original;
KIDD, Hazel J., 1530 S. Greenville, Off Sale
General, Original;
DRAKE, John R., 2225 S. Main St. , Off Sale
General, Original;
HERNANDEZ, Maria J. and Steve S., and
RESENDIZ, Gerardo A., 1019 W. Walnut, Off
Sale Beer & Wine, Person to Person Transfer;
and the City Attorney was instructed to file a protest with the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Board on the following application:
DAILEY, John "D", 3601 West First Street,
On Sale Beer, Person to Person Transfer,
(Protest by Police Department);
and the City Attorney was instructed to file a protest with the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Board on the following application because the
location is within 300 feet of a residential zone and is therefore subject
to the Minor Exception Permit procedure:
SUTCLIFFE, Leo H. and Lillian L., 2525 "I"
West 17th, On Sale General,Bona Fide Public
Eating Place, Original.
SOLICITATION APPLICATIONS
Approved the following
solicitation application:
GIRLS CLUB OF GARDEN GROVE, INC. , Candy sale,
door-to-door, to purchase craft supplies, from January
10, 1973 to January 27, 1973.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
18
JANUARY 15, 1973
CONSENT CALENDAR - (Continued)
VARIANCE AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Received and ordered filed
the following applications:
VA 72-85, FIRST WESTERN BANK - To install a
temporary building for a savings and loan office until
the permanent facility has been constructed, at
3875 S. Bristol Street; APPROVED.
CUP 72-23, CA_MILE CHRISTIAN CHURCH - To
establish a day care center and expand an existing
church facility, at 837 East Bishop Street; APPROVED.
DEEDS, NO CASH Received and ordered filed
GRANTEE, CITY a report of No-Cash Deeds
accepted by the City Manager,
pursuant to Resolution #69-156, from December 28, 1972 through
January 10, 1973, inclusive.
DEED WITH CASH
GRANTOR, CITY
in connection with the sale:
Approved the following deed
and authorized the Mayor to
sign all necessary documents
Linger, et al., north side of Seventeenth, east side
of French, Court settlement.
FINAL TRACT MAP Approved the final map,
accepted the dedications
thereon, and the bonds,
and authorized execution of the subdivision agreement, on the
following:
MAP :#7711 - South side of MacArthur Boulevard,
350 feet west of Bear Street, 182 lots.
SURPLUS PROPERTY Declared surplus and
authorized the demolition
of the following property,
and the retention of the 6-foot concrete block wall:
SURPLUS PROPERTY REPORT #73-1 - for improve-
ments located at 419 East Fifth Street.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE Following the approval of the
LICENSE APPLICATION Consent Calendar, John Dailey,
JOHN "D" DAILEY 13222 Magnolia Blvd. , Garden
Grove, spoke on his behalf
after being advised by the Mayor that Council had already instructed the
City Attorney to prepare a letter of protest on his application. He stated
that he had been unable to get an arrest record from the Police Department
before making his application and that most of his police record involved
arrests made 25 or 30 years ago.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
19
JANUARY 15, 1973
CONSENT CALENDAR - (Continued)
Councilman Herrin stated that he had depended on the recommendations
made by the Police Department when casting his vote, and suggested to
Mr. Dailey that if he felt his conduct in recent years warranted approval,
that he contact the Police Department and convince them so that they
would withdraw their protest.
* * * ~-~ * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR FINIS * * * * * * * * * * *
AGREEMENT On motion of Councilman
BROADWAY OVERCROSS Yamamoto, seconded by
Councilman Villa, with
Councilman~ Markel voting NO, Council approved and authorized the Mayor
and Clerk to execute the following agreement:
BROADWAY OVERCROSS (AGREEMENT NO. 2759), between
the City and the State of California, Division of Highways,
for financing and administration of the Broadway Overcros s
Project at the Santa A_na Freeway.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE Councilman Herrin's motion
LICENSE APPLICATION to receive and file the follow-
ing ABC application was
seconded by Councilman Patterson, and carried on a 541 vote, Councilman
Yamamoto dissenting.
DESANTIS ENTERPRISES, INC. , 315 West 17th Street,
On Sale Beer, Person to Person Transfer.
SURPLUS PROPERTY On motion of Councilman
REPORT ~73-2 Yamamoto, seconded by
Councilman Patterson, and
unanimously carried, Council set for public auction at 7:30 P. M. , on
February 20, 1973, the sale of the following property to th~ highest bidder
subject to conditions contained in the Surplus Property Report:
Old City Hall, located on the southeast corner of Third
and Main Streets.
READING WAIVED On motion of Councilman
Herrin, seconded by
Councilman Yamamoto,
and unanimously carried, the full reading of ordinances and resolutions,
the titles of which appeared on the public Agenda, was waived.
ORD. NS-Il50 AN ORDINANCE OF THE
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF SANTA ANA
CREATING A COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT
TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW was adopted on motion of
Councilman villa, seconded by Councilman Patterson, and carried on the
following roll call vote:
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
2O
JANUARY 15, 1973
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Villa, Patterson, Griset, Yamamoto
Herrin, Markel
Evans
Prior to voting, Mr. Joe Gilmaker, 308 West 4th Street, spoke against the
adoption of the ordinance, stating that he had met with members of the
redevelopment agency in Long Beach and had been told that they were not
going to sell revenue bonds because they were too expensive; that they
were going to receive Government urban renewal money and that their
downtown area would be last to be redeveloped since the government money
would go for residential purposes. Pie further stated that there were many
sitting on the Council who had a conflict of interest, that the redevelopment plan
was being pushed by a small group of property owners and businessmen, and
requested that the matter be submitted to the people for a vote.
Councilman Patterson requested that Mr. Gilmaker give to Council any
information he may have as to any member of Council who may have a
conflict of interest.
In response, Mr. Gilmaker stated that the Mayor was a property owner
downtown.
Councilman Patterson reminded Mr. Gilmaker that the City Attorney had
previously ruled that the Mayor had no conflict of interest.
Mr. Gilmaker then referred to insurance sales by Councilman Villa to
property owners in the downtown area.
Councilman Villa stated that if Mr. Gilmaker knew of any insurance accounts
in the downtown area, he would like to know about them so that he could
collect the commissions; that it was irresponsible to make remarks that
could not be substantiated; that there should be a limitation as to how far
a citizen could go in making irresponsible charges. He requested Mr.
Gilrnaker to give him names of persons to whom he had sold insurance in
the downtown area or to anyone who would conflict in any way with redevelopment.
Mr. Gilmaker stated that Mr. Villa had previously told him that he had
accounts in the downtown area, and Councilman Villa stated that he had
not made that statement. Mr. Gilmaker then apologized and stated that
he must have misunderstood Councilman Villa.
Pauline Lockwood, representing the League of Women Voters in the Santa
Ana, Tustin, and Orange area, stated that their organization had watched
with concern the redevelopment proposals; that the jurisdiction of the
proposed redevelopment agency included a large area and that thousands
of people lived within the area. She asked if the residents of the affected
area would be represented on the commission and had there been any
provisions made for the relocation of people in the area.
The Mayor responded that the area she had mentioned was only the survey
area; that there was a difference between the survey area and the project
area to be determined by the commission; that the project area may be only
a small part of the survey area; that the residents in the area would be
represented only as they are represented in the City Council and that any
action taken would be subject to public hearing; and that a policy had been
established that much concern would be given to those who had to be
relocated.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 21 JANUARY 15, 1973
Councilman Markel requested the City Attorney to give an explanation as
to what would be considered a conflict of interest pertaining to the redevelop-
ment issues.
The City Attorney responded that when the project area had been determined,
all members of the City Council, Planning Commission, or any commission
that is a subdivision of the Council, and the Redevelopment Commissioners
must disclose in writing any property that they own in the project area,
and that they would be prohibited from acquiring additional property in the
Billy C. Hall, Executive Director of the Santa Ana City Center Association,
spoke in favor of the adoption of the ordinance, stating that their Board of
Directors had discussed the participation of the Councilmen in the
redevelopment program and had discussed the names presented for the
Commission, and that they did not feel any conflict of interest existed
and that they had nothing but extreme faith in the Council and those on
the Commission.
RES. 73-1 RESOLUTION 73-1 AMENDING
HOUSING COORDINATOR SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION
NO. 58-281 TO ADD CLASS
TITLE OF HOUSING COORDINATOR was adopted on motion of Councilman
Villa, seconded by Councilman Patterson, and carried on a 4-2 vote, with
Councilmen Herrin and Markel dissenting.
BIKE-A-THON The request contained in the
letter dated December 27,
1972, from the American
Cancer Society, Orange County Unit, for the inclusion of Santa Aha in one
of their proposed routes for a fund raising Bike-a-thon throughout Orange
County, was approved subject to applicable Code and Administrative
procedure requirements, on motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded
by Councilman Patterson, and unanimously carried.
POOL FENCING ORDINANCE Council considered the letter
MAN-MADE LAKES from Covington Brothers,
dated January 3, 1973, request-
ing to speak at the meeting. Mr. Richard HIuffman, Vice President of
Covington Brothers, 2451 E. Orangethorpe, Fullerton, stated that he would
like to make a presentation regarding their proposed 182-unit development
at 1950 MacArthur Boulevard which would include a 2-1/2 acre lake, and
the possible exemption from compliance with Section 1501 of the Building
Code requiring that the lake be fenced.
The City Manager stated that the City ordinance requires fencing for any
body of water over 18 inches deep, and that the City would have no objections
to considering, an amendment if safety provisions could be provided; that
the City would be pleased to consider the developer's safety designs; that an
amendment could be made to the existing code; that there already was a
Section of the Building Code providing for an alternative design of equal
safety, however, staff had informed him that no specific designs had been
presented; that the City was concerned about depth, access, slope, and the
possible use of the lake for boating and recreational purposes; that there
were no natural lakes in Santa Ana; and that an amendment to the code to
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ZZ JANUARY 15, 1973
provide for a man-made lake had already been drafted in anticipation of
the need.
Mr. Huffman stated that they objected to the in-depth requirements which
meant a 90 to 120 day delay in their plans; that they were ready to begin
grading; that they had been alarmed when they found that Santa Aha was the
only city with that ordinance and shocked that they would have to enclose
their beautiful lake with a five foot fence; that they had not been permitted
to submit plans without saying that they would build a fence; that there were
no fences around the lakes at Lake Forest; that he;had been raised on the
shores of Lake Michigan and it had not been fenced; that he had never seen
a lake that was fenced; that he had hired the top lake consultant in the
country to make a presentation to resolve the time delay problem and
apathy on the part of the Building Department who would not allow them
to get the job done; that they had ,offered to pay additional costs in order
to have their plans expedited; that the present ordinance was inflexible
and unworkable.
Councilman Yamamoto's motion to refer the matter to staff, was seconded
by Councilman Villa, and unanimously carried.
TRACT 7494 The letter from Grant
POLICE ENFORCEMENT Corporation dated January 9,
1973, requesting police
enforcement according to California Vehicle Code on all private streets
as shown on Tract Map 7494 recorded January 27, 1972, was referred to
staff for investigation and report on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded
by Councilman Yamamoto, with Councilman villa voting NO.
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE Council considered the
ORDINANCE f report of the Director of
Building Safety dated
December 28, 1972 incorporating a copy of the property maintenance
ordinance of the City of Inglewood, and the Director's Interim Progress
Report, dated Januaryll, 1973, regarding the possible adoption of a
property maintenance ordinance for the City.
The City Manager stated that additional staff meetings would be required
before a final draft of a proposed property maintenance ordinance could
be prepared, but invited Council to give to staff any suggestions or guide-
lines they might have.
Councilman Herrin stated that he would not want to give the power to the
City to fo,rce maintenance of an individual's property.
Councilman Villa stated that he felt that Inglewood had a very good
property maintenance ordinance and that a similar one was needed by
the City to upgrade the downtown.
Councilman Patterson stated that he was in favor of the wording of the
Inglewood ordinance in general, however, that certain ambiguous wording
and overly stringent provisions should be deleted.
Mr. Billy C. Hall, Executive Director of the City Center Association,
stated that his organization was in favor of a property maintenance
ordinance and requested that it include provisions regarding the cleaning
up of debris from in front of and around vacant buildings.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 23 JANUARY 15, 1973
RECESS
with the same Councilmen present.
At 3:45 P.M., a recess was
declared. The meeting
reconvened at 3:55 P.M.
ADDITION TO The report of the City Manager
VICE SQUAD dated January 4, 1973, regard-
ing the possible addition of a
position to work with the vice detail in the Police Department, was received
and ordered filed on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman
Patterson, and unanimously carried.
The report stated that the Police Administrators concurred that additional
staffing was needed in the vice program; however, that all police depart-
mental staffing needs should be evaluated and reviewed after the new Police
Chief arrives in February, 1973, and that decisions concerning staffing
should be deferred until that time.
SUMMARY OF COUNCIL The Summary of Council
REFERRALS Referrals dated January 15,
1973, containing a list of
pending action items referred to staff by Council was received and ordered
filed by informal unanimous approval.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A copy of a letter dated
FLOMAR KENNELS January 15, 1973, from H.
Lawson Mead, of the law
firm of Miller, Nisson & Kogler, 2014 North Broadway, representing Mr.
and Mrs. James Henry, owners of Flomar Kennels , to Bruce E. Harrington,
of the law firm of Kalmback, DeMarco, Knapp & Chillingworth, 550 Newport
Center Drive, Newport Beach, representing the Alison Company, was
received and ordered filed on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by
Councilman Villa, and unanimously carried.
The communication was presented to Council by Mr. Mead, and set forth
the intentions of both parties to prepare an agreement settling the problems
existing as a result of the proximity of the apartments being constructed
by the Alison Company to the kennels owned by Mr. and Mrs. Henry. Mr.
Mead asked Council to consider an amendment to Section 5-60 of the
Municipal Code which would prohibit residents living within 200 feet of
a kennel from filing barking dog complaints.
The City Attorney stated that he had just received the communication and
had not had a chance to read it, but that the matters had been discussed
with either himself or members of his staff.
Mayor Griset reminded Mr. Mead that the matter had been referred to
the City Attorney and expressed concern that Mr. Mead had presented
Council with a communication without first going through the City Attorney's
office.
Mr. Harrington stated that the communication presented by Mr. Mead
did accurately reflect their proposed agreement and requested that the
City share in the costs incurred in insulating and screening the Flomar
Kennels to the extent of one-third of the estimated $5,000.00 cost.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
24
JANUARY 15, 1973
Mayor Griset stated that the matter being discussed was legal in nature
and that Councll would not be prepared to accept responsibility for the
City-paying any amount; that Council was interested and hoped that the
parties could move ahead with a resolutlon of the problem, however, they
would not be able to act without the advice of the City Attorney.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
NEW COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Councilman Villa asked when
Council would be moving into
the new Council Chambers.
The City Manager stated that he had a memorandum from the Public Works
Department indicating that the audio-visual work was to begin that week
and that the contractors would have 75 working days to complete the job.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Councilman Markel stated
that he had had quite a number
of inquiries from citizens
stating that certain bus stops were not being used frequently enough to
warrant a stop, and suggested that a survey be made as soon as possible
to eliminate one-half of the bus stops. The Mayor referred Councilman
Markel's suggestion to staff.
After some discu~ssion, Council info,rmally agreed that the new bus system
should be given a sufficient amount of time to increase the amount of their
passengers before any elimination of bus stops is recommended.
Councilman Markel referred to a letter that he had received from Dr.
Walter T. Flaherty, 17502 Irvine Boulevard, dated January 10, 1973, and
Councilman Patterson's motion to refer the letter to staff, including the
City Attorney, for a report, was seconded by Councilman Villa, and
unanimously carried.
Councilman Markel stated that he had recently visited the County
Communications Center and that he had observed tremendous advancement
in communications and that the equipment being used had a rating from
Westinghouse indicating it was the best and highest rated communications
system in the United States; that any City Fire Department, equipment or
Police equipment could be repaired at the center at no expense for labor
to the City; and that he had been very much impressed.
RECESS At 4:50 P.M., the meeting
was recessed to 7:30 P.M.,
at which~iime it was
reconvened with all Council members present. Following th'e Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag, the Invocation was given by The Reverend Leslie
Zimmerman, of Goodwill Industries.
SPECIAL ORDER OF THE DAY In recognition of National
Kiwanis Club Week, the
Mayor presented Mr. Mas
Uyesugi, of the Santa Aha Kiwanis Club, with a Proclamation. Mr.
Uyesugi~ read,the purposes and objectives of Kiwanis Club and stated that
their theme for 1973 was "Share My Life". He presented the Mayor with
a plaque making him an honorary member.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Z5
JANUARY 15, 1973
PUBLIC HEARING; APPEAL $313 The Mayor opened the public
MINOR EXCEPTION 7Z-Z3 hearing on Appeal #313 filed
LOUIS F. OLIVAREZ by Louis F. Olivarez, appeal-
ing the Zoning Administrator's
denial of Minor Exception 7Z-23 to construct a fence, 6'6" high, in the front
setback area at 523 and 605 North Jenkins Street.
The Director of Planning showed a slide of the zoning in the neighborhood
and passed the file around to Council so that they could see the quality of
fencing .involved. He stated that he had sent notice of the Minor Exception
application to the residents of the four abutting lots and had received no
written or verbal protests.
The following persons spoke in favor of the appeal:
George Verene, 6 02 North Jenkins
Clara Verene, 602 North Jenkins
Dolores Hernandez, 519 North Jenkins
Joe Flores, 446 South Flower
Denzil Tadlock, 609 North Jenkins
The proponents stated that the fence was beautiful; that it improved the
neighborhood and was an asset to the community.
Cart J. Forbes, 610 North Jenkins, stated that his only objection to the
fence was its height; that Mr. Olivarez had known at the time he built
it that there was a 4 foot limit; that he had not been allowed to put up a
five foot fence and wondered why another man could put up a six foot fence.
Mr. Louis F. Olivarez, the appellant, presented photographs of his fence
to Council.
Councilman Herrin's motion to grant the appeal and instruct the City
Attorney to prepare a resolution approving Minor Exception 72-23 was
seconded by Councilman Villa, and carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: I-te~ ~in, Villa,
NOES: Yamamoto
ABSENT: None
Evans, Griset, Patterson, Markel
TAXICAB PERMITS The City Attorney stated that
since the last meeting,
negotiations had been underway
between his office and the attorneys representing Blue-White Cab Co. and
Yellow Cab Co. regarding the twelve permits authorized by Council on
November 20; that the attorney representing Blue-White Cab Co. had
represented that his client, Gordon P. Wiggins, had control over UTO,
Inc., and was prepared to surrender the ten permits issued to UTO, Inc.;
that his office had not yet received the documentation enabling them to
proceed; that Council could either conditionally approve the issuance of
the twelve available permits to Gordon P. Wiggins contingent upon receiv-
ing the UTO documentation from Mr. Wiggins' attorney, or carry the
decision on the matter to the next meeting.
Councilman Evans' motion to receive and file (with right to re-apply)
the letter dated January 15, 1973, from Melvin F. Cohen, Attorney at Law,
401 Civic Center Drive West, was seconded by Councilman Patterson,
and unanimously carried.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
26
JANUARY 15, 1973
Councilman Patterson's motion to issue twelve permits to Gordon P.
Wiggins, doing business as Blue-White Cab Co., subject to Mr. Wiggins'
surrender to the City Attorney of the ten permits held by UTO, Inc. in
a fashion acceptable to the City Attorney, was seconded by Councilman
Villa, and carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Patterson, Villa, Evans, Herrin
NOES: Griset, Yamamoto, Markel
ABSENT: None
WILLOWICK GOLF COURSE Council continued consideration
of negotiations between the
City of Santa Aha and the City
of Garden Grove concerning Willowick Golf Course to the meeting of
February 5, 1973, on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman
Patterson, and unanimously carried.
Prior to voting, a petition, bearing 425 signatures, requesting development
of a park site in the Willowick area, was filed with the Clerk by Romero
Garcia, 511 West 16th Street, and was ordered received and filed on motion
of Councilman Ylerrin, seconded by Councilman Patterson, and unanimously
carried.
Mr. Douglas Clark, 1510 North Mar-les Drive, spoke against the de-annexation
of the golf course by the City.
RECESS
with all Council members present.
At 8:35 P.M., a recess was
declared. The meeting
reconvened at 8:40 P.M.
BUDGET REVISIONS Council approved the proposals
FOR 1972-73 contained in the report of the
City Manager dated January 8,
1973, and amended the 1972-73 fiscal year Budget as indicated on the summary
computer printout sheets attached to the report, on motion of Councilman
Evans, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto with Councilman Markel voting NO.
Prior to voting, Councilman I-lerrin stated that he still was not convinced
of the need for relocating the fire station, and asked what advantage there
was in the relocation.
In response, the City Manager stated that the fire station was being
relocated to serve the area around the Broadway/Main Street complex
where high value developers would be looking for good fire protection.
Councilman Markel stated that he felt more money should go toward the
improvement of First Street.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
matters.
At 8:50 P.M., the meeting
was adjourned to an Executive
Session to consider legal
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 27 JANUARY 15, 1973
ADJOUi~NMENT The meeting reconvened
at 9:25 P.M., with all
: Councilmen present and
was adjourned on motion of Councilman l~atterson,, zeconded:by Councilman
Villa and unanimously carried.
Florence I. Malone
· Clerk of the Council
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 28 JANUARY 15, 1973