Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCA DEPT TRANSPORTATION 5 - 2003015491 District Agreement # 12'-419 ' A-2003-049 12-ORA Patricia Lane Scenic Enhancements in the City of Santa Ana PP NO: 9719 EA: 12-0C0800 District Agreement 12-419 Funding Source: SHOPP-TEA CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO EFFECTiVE ON is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation; referred to herein as "STATE", and CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city existing and organized under the laws of the State of California, referred to herein as "CITY". District Agreement # 12 -419 RECITALS Pursuant to Section 14526.5 of the Government Code, and pursuant to the California Transportation Commission Resolution # G-98-20, STATE has an approved State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) for the expenditure of transportation funds for major capital improvements. Included in this SHOPP is the Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program consisting of transportation improvement projects. One of these TEA projects proposes the acquisition and construction of Patricia Lane Scenic Enhancements, near Interstate 5 in the City of Santa Ana that is outside of State right of way, referred to herein as "PROJECT", see Exhibit A, attached to and made a part of this Agreement. CITY desires to perform the right of way acquisition and prepare the contract documents, advertise, award and administer the construction contract for PROJECT. STATE desires to provide funds up to 88.53% of the eligible PROJECT costs, not to exceed the amount of $533,000 to CITY from the STATE-managed TEA funds, see Exhibit B. 5. PROJECT is included in the approved Orange County Transportation Authority Federal Transportation Improvement Plan (FTIP). 6. The parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be constructed, financed, and maintained. .SECTION I CITY AGREES: To perform all, including but not limited to preliminary engineering, environmental documentation and certification (both CEQA and NEPA, if applicable), plans and specifications preparation, utility identification and location, engineering and documentation necessary to advertise and award the construction PROJECT, and all necessary construction engineering services for PROJECT. To bear all actual costs of PROJECT, including all capital and support costs, in excess of STATE's $533,000 contribution. Estimated costs of PROJECT are shown on Exhibit B, attached and made a part of this Agreement. To submit invoices to STATE for reimbursement of PROJECT expenses incurred by CITY. In no event shall STATE's share toward PROJECT exceed the amount of $533,000, including land acquisition. Invoices shall be submitted on CITY letterhead to 2 District Agreement # 12 -419 STATE Project Manager. Invoices will be prepared in the manner as described in Chapter 5, Accounting/Invoices, of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. To retain or cause to be retained for audit by STATE or other government auditors for a period of three (3) years from date of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) payment of final voucher, or four (4) years from date of final payment under the contract, whichever is longer, all records and accounts relating to PROJECT. Upon completion of PROJECT, to assume ownership, maintenance and liability responsibility for all portions of PROJECT. That this PROJECT includes the acquisition of STATE right of way and an Agreement Declaring Restrictive Covenants approved by STATE will be recorded against the title of all Real Property purchased with or paid for by any type of Federal or State Funds. SECTION II STATE AGREES: 1. Upon receipt of detailed invoices from CITY, to reimburse CITY for eligible costs incurred under this Agreement up to the amount of $533,000, which figure represents STATE's sole and only contribution towards costs of PROJECT. Invoices will be paid within 60 days of receipt. STATE's contribution of the PROJECT expense shall be up to 88.53% of eligible PROJECT costs, not to exceed $533,000 for right of way acquisition, design and construction cost, as shown on Exhibit B, attached to and made a part of this Agreement. SECTION IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the ap- propriation of the resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation Commission. Should CITY acquire property for PROJECT or perform any work or advertise a contract for PROJECT prior to the allocation of resources by the Califomia Transportation Commission and prior to Federal Highway Administration approval for Federal participation, there is no guarantee of STATE's and/or Federal participation and CITY shall assume all risks thereof. 3. All applicable procedures and policies relating to the use of Federal Funds or STATE gas tax funds shall apply notwithstanding other provisions of this Agreement. District Agreement # 12 -419 Federal Funding will be used to finance this project. Therefore, all documentation, environmental documentation, right of way certification, design and construction shall follow the Federal guidelines as established in current Local Assistance procedures. Prior to award of the construction contract for PROJECT, STATE may terminate this Agreement by providing the CITY with thirty (30) days written notice, provided that STATE pays CITY for all PROJECT-related costs incurred by CITY prior to termination. Prior to award of the construction contract for PROJECT, CITY may terminate this Agreement by written notice. If CITY terminates this Agreement, CITY shall bear all PROJECT-related costs incurred by CITY prior to termination and reimburse to STATE, within 90 days, any funds which may have been advanced or paid to CITY. 7. Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of State highways different from the standard care imposed by law. 8. Any changes to PROJECT, before, during or after PROJECT acquisition and/or construction, that does not comply with or is in conflict with the TEA Program requirements may result in CITY being required to reimburse STATE the entire amount of TEA funds contributed to the project or the value of the TEA fund contribution, based upon the fair market value of the acquisition and/or construction, at the time the conflict and/or non-compliance is determined, whichever is greater. 9. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 10. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. 11. This Agreement may be terminated or provisions contained herein may be altered, changed, or amended by mutual consent of the parties hereto. 4 District Agreement # 12 '-419 ' · 12. No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 13. This Agreement shall terminate upon completion of construction of PROJECT and upon final payment to CITY by STATE, pursuant to Section II, Article 2 of this Agreement, or on December 31, 2005, whichever is earlier in time; however the ownership, maintenance, liability, claims and Section III, Provision 8 shall remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement. 5 District Agreement # 12 -4'1'9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation JEFF MORALES Director of Transportation By ~~ ..F,N~QU~-~AL6N-S O - Deputy District Director, Project Delivery District 12 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: Attorney Department of Transportation CITY OF SANTA ANA City Manager ATTEST: PATRICIA E. HEALY Clerk of the Council CERT~IED AS TO FUNDS: NEDA SABER-ANS~I District Budget Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: MIKE VIGLIOYT ,A~ Deputy City Attorney CERTII~IED AS TO FINANCIAL TERMS AND POLICIES: ,,~/(ccount~/~d(ninistrator APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: JO~RIP RIBBLE Executive Director of Parks, Recreation Community Services Agency 6 District Agreement # 12 -419 12 - ORA Patricia Lane Scenic Enhancements in the City of Santa Ana PP NO: 9719 EA: 12-0C0800 District Agreement 12-419 Funding Source: SHOPP-TEA EXHIBIT A 1999-2000 Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program Application PATRICIA LANE SCENIC ENHANCEMENTS City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency September 3, 1999 7 District Agreement # 12 -419 ,T A-1 1999 - 2000 TIL-'kNSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITLES (TEA) PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION CITY OF SANTA ,~kNA Public Works Agency Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency September 3, 1999 8 Distric~ A~reement # 12 -419 Orange Cotmq' Tran3portation AuthoriW Ttan~ortation Enhancement Activities Program PATRICbk DXNE SCENIC ENHAaNCEMENTS Table of Content~ Application Forms: Paa One: General Project information Form Part One: Oeneral Pro~ect Information Narrative Part Two: Funding Form Part Two: Funding; Item E~timate Pa~ ~ree: Agen~ Resolution Part Foot: Screening Criteria Pan Five: Evaluation Criteria l 2 3 4 5 63 8,9 Letter~ of Sut~rort~ City of Santa ,ama Mayor Mi~tel A. Pul ido City of Santa .ama Councilmember Ted Moreno Saddleback View Neighborhood .~sociation E.~hibiu A: Project Cost E4rimate B: Proposed Budget/Source of Funds C: Project Site Photo3 D: Acquisition Map E: Site Map G: Schedule H: Environmental Documentation (Negath'e Declaration) 10 10 I1,12 13 14 15 16 9 District Agreement # 12 -419 Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Application Form PART ONE; GENERAL PROJECT tNFORMATIO .N AD~ilN{$TERING AGENCY APPLICANT praJacl Administrator/parson with day-to-day responsibility for Ran One, AdmlnlsZral;oiVOe$1gn Manager Part~s, Recreation & Comml~Nty Services Agency 8~8 W. Santa Aha Bivd.- ~ Floor ~nta Aha, CA 92702 7t4-571~22~ TEA FUNDS REQUESTED $. 532.~00 NON-FEDERAL TEA MATCH $. 177.000 TOTAL TEA PROJECT COST $. 7~)g. SgO ~ T~ IS a sland-alona p~oJact. ~ T~ Is pa*t of a target project Total ProJacl Cost $, 710,0~ (Round dolors Io nearest Ihousan~) Parson who can answer questions about this application [Name, lille, phana, fax) J.~n R~.~, Executive Dlrecf~r Ci~, of Santa Ann Publ;c Works Agency . tot W, Fourth Street- 4~ Fteor Santa Ans, CA 92702 714.E47.5554 PARTNER[S) (Name, Ul[o. agsncy, address, phone, fax) PROPOSED SCHEDULE: Slart Enviranmenlal Studies Draft Environmental Document Final Environmental Document Begin Design Engineering Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimates comple[e Start Right of Way Acquisition Right of Way Certification Ready Ic Adverlise Award Construction Project Completion (open for use) QUarter and Year Summer ~ 999 Summer 1999 Summer fggg t4~nter t ggg/2000 Summer 2000 WNICH CATEGORY OR CATEGORIES IS THE PROJECT BEING APPLIED UNDER (FOR PROGRAM AREA 3, PLEASE IDENTIFY PRIORITY IF MORE THAN ONE CATEGORY) Program Area 1 Program Area 2 Program Area 3 Bicycle FaclliUe~ Pedeslr~an Facilities Rails 1o Trails Ouldoor advedlsing removal Runoff water ~lluflon ~nlrel Tmn~n 10 Diatrict Agreement # 12 -419 PART ONE: GENEi~kL PRO,YECT INFORMATION PROJECT SCOPE OF PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION ENHANCFAMEN-r ACTIVITIES Describe fl',c project's location, i/mits of :york, size, etc. ('Not fl'~e justification or The proposed project is located on a site in the t:orIh-cast quadrant of the City of Santa A no, along the btterstate-$ freewa3~ Tiffs sire, currently owned by the California Department of Transportation, is e.vsentially "left over' land which curre;tt~v stands idle as an abandoned, desolate dirt lot beaveen a neighborhood and a nta~ottQ~ $o.ndwdH ala~tg the h~terstate-S fre~vay. This area resulted .front the "]nterztat~-5 Frem~, Widening Project"con&tct~ &v CalTra~. Ivhere nine re~idential propertie$ ~vere purcfi~ed for~ee~xO, expat~ion, but whose remnants were forsaken w~e. cottstatcffoR was completed. Scope of work bivo[ves scen& enhancements through the acqu[Mtion. {andscapbtg and maintenance of this property. Along it '~ length, the parcel$ are bordered by the lmerstate-S freeway to the north and Patrieia ]~ane .4vemte to the south. ReMdential properties abut eaclt end. EXPLANATION OF TEA CATEGORY AND FUNDING FJSTIFICATION Provide a narrative explanation o_r why the project Pa its chosen category and justification for TEA funding: The propose,t project fit. r the category of "£andscaping and $cenlc Beautification ", as it woaM i. valve heavily lambcaping a site adj'acettt to a major freeway, lending itself as a scenic corridor to freewtO' travelers and a visual buffer bet~veen the transportation system attd adjoin fag aeighborltood. The snbject area consists oJ'retmlants of nitre residential properties purchased by the Califorttia Department of Transportation to make wa.y for tire ~videning of lnterstate-$. Only a portiott oftheseproperties were tt~cd attd when constrttction was completed, alt area of approximatel, v otte acre was 'left over" attd se~mhlgly abandongd. /Jecattse of this, tlte~e remaantpropertie$ are tto! ntt[j, nnattracti~'e, bat a atagnet to trash &anphtg, litter and loiterers. The City of Santa AJta wishes to ass.me ownership of this proflerO' and tut, wltat has become visaal blight arid host to ttnfmx~rable activities Into a site which benefits freeway travelers, neath)' residettts and the environment, Through the creation ora landscape buffer and provi$ion of routOw tllaintatfftltCeo the visltal, ttoi$~ and cttrbotl dioxide impact to the neighhorhoa~t w#l be tttit~ated and it~ addition, ritz urbatt landscape will create a pleasing backtb'op for highway riders. 11 District A~reemen~ # 12 -4~9 " "'?ntact ~ Jirr~ RO~s Agency .... Pubh'c Works PART TWO.: FUNDING Title. Executive Direc(qr Phone/FAX, 1714t 647-5654/56~2 PROJECT COMPONENT COSTS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PHASE: · Construction Documenls $10,000. · Environmental Documents $ 0. TOTAL PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING $10,000. RIGHT OF WAY PHASE (ACQUISITION): · Capital · Support costs TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PHASE: · Construction contractltems Contingencies Construction engIneering TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 'see next sheet for detail $259,500 $ 0 $259,5O0 $ 307,000' $ 33,000 $ t00,000 $440,000 IYEAR . ~)e. Engineering Right of Way ConstrUction TOTAL IN WHICH FUNDS ARE REQUESTED FY 1999/00 0 259,500 259,500 FY 2000/01 $ 0 $ 273,000 $ 273,000 LOCAL FUNDING SHARE DETAIL Phases A) Federal + B) Match = C) Total Cost D') Total Cost Preliminary Eng $0. $10,000 $ 10,000 $ N.A. Right of Way $259,500 $ 0 $259,500 $ N,A. Construction $273,000 $t67,000 $440,000 $ N.A. TOTAL $532,500 $177,000 $709,500 $ N.A. '.Fill in colqmn 'D' only when TEA is pad o.f larger project, not a stand-alone proiect ~oU~CE(S) OF MATCH (Spell Out; No acronyms) Prelimlnary Engineering: Acquisition & Development Funds Right of Way; TEA Funds Construction: Acquisition & Development Funds I~AINTENANCE Who will maintain?: Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency, Park Sen/ices DMsion ..What [s the source of maintenance funds? City of Santa Aha General Fund 12 District Agreement # 12 -419 · PART TWO: FUNDING f¢ontlnued') 0 5431 1TEM ESTIMATE - CONSTRUCTION ITEMS Acquisition: L$ ~ Development: -Cleadn~Gmhb~g -Impaffcd Fill -Drainage -Soil Pre~O~d~g U~II Price $259,500 $259,5O0 LS I $ lO,O00 $ 10,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 100,000 6,000 6,000 ~5,000 /,GOO 25,000 82,000 33,000 $709,500 13 District Agreement # ~2 -419 RESOLUTION NO. 1999 -0 52. A RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF SANTA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMPZNT ACTIVITY PROGRA/Vl UNDER TIlE 1998 TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR /HE 21ST CEN'fTJRy FOR PROJECTS LISTED ON THE AIl'ACHED PROJECT LIST. WHEREAS, the United Slate Congress in June 1998 enacted the Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 which make funds available to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for Iran~porta ion enhancement ac ~vities; and WHELLEAS~'OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals; and WHEREAS, Public Works Agency (PWA) o£ the City of Santa Ann possesses authority to nominate transportation en. haneement activhies and to finance, acquire,.e-~d cormLrucl l!he proposed projects; and .. WHEREAS, formal action of the City Council or ~e City of Santa Ann .autherlzcs ihe nomination o[' projects listed on the attached project list, including .all'understafi~.'.g ,and assurances contained therein, and authorizes The Executive D~rector of t.he'..PW~.5'to, acttm connection whh tho n=mination and to provide such additional informatlnn az ~tay b~ re~lUii'ed; and ~ WHEREAS, the PWA will malntaln and operate the properly acquired, developed, rehabilitated, or restored for the life of the resultant facility(ins) or activity; and WHEKEAS, with the approval of the California Department of Transportation (Cahrans) and OCTA, the PWA or its successors in interest in the pro.hefty may transfer the responsiNh y to maintain .'md operate the property; and WI-IEREAS, the PWA ,,viii give to Caltrans's and OCTA's representatives access to tad the right to examine all records, book% papers or documents related to the transportation enhancement activity; and WHEREAS, the PWA will cause work on the projects to be commenced within a ~'ea~onable time alter receipt ornotification from file State that funds have been approved by the Federal Highxtmy Administration and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence; and WHEREAS, the PWA ',viii comply, where applicable, with provisions of lite California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the American Disabilities Act, the Secretm'y of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeological and Historic Presort'orion, and any other federal, state, and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations. 14 (22) District Agreement # 12 -419 Resolution No. i 999 -0 52 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Executive Director of the PWA is hereby authorized to apply for the Tranaportation Enhancement Activity Program under the Transportation Equity Act for the 2 [ ST Century for projects listed on the project list, Exhibit "A," anaehed hereto and incorpoiated herein by reference. 2. The City of Santa Ann ngrc~ to fund its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount. This action is in conformance v.4th the OCTA TransportatiOn Enhancement Activity Program guidelines and does not exceed seventy. five (75) percent of the total eligible costs. ADOPTED this 16th day of Clerk of'the Coancil August ,1999. Mi~fA. Pulido, Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pulido Aye Lutz Aye BJst Absent C~ds~y ~ Franklin ~ McGulgan A_Ay_q' Morcno Not Voeing APPROVED AS TO FORM: $oseph W. Fletcher City Attorney Cr~sfine L. Shaw Deputy City Attome3, O 15 District Agreement # 12 -419 C£RTIFICATE OF O[U[GINALITY State of Count)' of Orange 1. SANICE C. GUY. Clerk oF the Cotmc{{. do hereby cerllfy ihs o,ached Resolution No. //'Y'~ -03'~'' to be rite original ~esolution adopted by tt~e Cluff Council of the City orSanta Date: City of Santa Aha 16 District Agreement # 12 -~1-19 EXHIBIT A PROJECT LIST TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTI~rY PROGIL4bI Santa Ann R.egional Transportation Center (S.4.RTC) Art Panel Pro joel -The project consist of tM construct[on ora cinderbloek wall adjacent to the existing railroad tracks just east of the 8ARTC railroad platform. The wall w~ll shield the County maintenance yard from view and also function as a backdrop upon which art panels will be mounted. Patricla Lane Pa rlc- This project requires the acquisition and development of a 1-acre neighborhood park ~ite from nine remmmt properties that resulted from Santa Ann free~y widening project. SARTC Landscape Enhancement Plan - Pedestrian cut through Imffic has badly damaged shrubbery that borders existing surface parking lots at the SARTC. The project would remove shrubbery and replace with grass luff areas. Additionally, accent trees and axchitectural lighting would be provided to enhance the visual aesthetics at the facility. Santiago Park Bike Trail West End) Gap Closure - Consl.~etios: nfo bike/pedestrian Irall and bridge at the wesl end of Santiago park is proposed to coanec~ to an existing ~rall wRhin Santiago Park. 17 District Agreement # 12 -419 PART FOUR: SCREENING CRITERIA UsC O triturate/fleet of paper tf n¢¢~,lsacy, [f a~ of tfi~ sereenlng criteria be/ow are ~ol in~. ~fie pr~po:al will not h~ oinked er ~'a~ualeA ~ "no" at. wet to any of tfie follon'b~g queMioa$ i~e~ately dmqual~ the propa~aL ')ex "~liH requlrux 5upponing e*~dence far the project to fie cvnslder~l for fua,ling. 1, Docs the project fit the TEA Program? ~'es a. Direet~elalfon to theIntermodalTraasportalion System Dei~be Iht project's direct relatlnn~h{P t0 th~ traa~ortat[mt $yatem In tile lullabying terms: ~oe~ ~e proposed project enhance {he transportation s~tem?} Function: ~t~ project ftnction~ as a vattal bt~r betweat the InterMate-3 fresvay and the re~file~tiat netgfibor/too~ ~l.[oreover. It provides sceuic beattt~cation to both areas, and bt o&tition, helps to alleviate noise and vehicle eln~Mon~ ~om fi'eeway travel, Proxtm{~: The praposed project ts directO' atOacent to a major transportation facility, the Intersrate. S freewa); Impact: The impact of the projebt is the traasformatloo of an area from ut~ight~, to pleasb:g, It a&o provide~ many emdrott.tental ben~ts. b. Over and above a normal project? ~Yes Explain. 0f the aet[vlly I~ mentioned ht an environmen(al document ~ u required mRlgallon, or I~ required by pemitting :lg~nci~s to proceed ~ith another project, the actlvt~ Is not over and above a "normal" project) The unO' mitigation measttres were those requh'cd on the part of the CaliJbrnia Department of Transportation to lessen die impact of their freeway widenbtg project. T]to-re ttteasttre$ #tc/uded the pro~,ision ara xototdt~'a# hearten tile freeway attd adjacettl neighborhood, and surfi:ce planting (vines). T/re I,mdscape pla~tting intended as part ~f tbis project goes abort an,'t bcs~ond those reqtdrentents. This neliviO~ t's trot req.ire¢l as part of aa)' em,lrottatetital docttment. This project ri'as created with the sole intent to bnpravc the qnaHty of life for nearby residents andJ'reeway travelers, and to improve the bnage of the Cityfi'om both of tlte.~e viewpolnt. L 2. Coafortoity a. ls ihe project conslstent (or "uoi inconsistettt") with federal, state, reginnal or local laud use and regioual transportation plaus, goals and policies'? .,~Yes ElNa Please de:scribe the pleas used in evaluating consistency: This proposcd projcct ia' consisteJtt with the CiO, of Santo Aha, Pubtec ti'or'ks Ageno' "Interstate-5 Re-Use Phln far the Cahflornia Department of Trunsportation Remnant Properties" 18 District Agreement # 12 -419 Thl.v project is also consistent with the "Circulation" and "Open Space ' elements of the L~0' ~ Ge.oral Plan ", wMch state, respectivelh; the following ~ two of its goals: "Create atlrt~cltt,e clrcldalto~ corridors lo e~fiance the CiO, ~ image" ami "Improve the City aesthetic quality ~v enhaacing the vizual appel of tntvt, l corridors., Itt addit[a~t, con.rtrttctb?n oft]iix proj¢ct~*#,r u'i#t~t tJtejurlsdictiot~ t~f thc Ci0, of'Salvia Att& Platmiag and Building Agency permit process. Durblg the preparatio, of the necessary construction documents, pIatts a~td specifications ~vill be s~tbmitted to the ?lamlh~g and Bufldl'ug ..tgenc. v for plan cltec~ and permit approval. 3. Financial Vlabilit3~ a. Is the project financial vtahle? Please describe any evidence supporting this conclusion. {The governing bndy is required to ~..~bmit a resalutlnn to this effect along with the application} .,~Yes I"lNo Match is readily available ht the Ci~.,'s Acquisition & Development Fund. A .n~bltota.ce badger has been ontli.ed an,[ n,i[[ be btclnded itt tho City's FYO1-02 badger plan. :l resohltion approved by the City of ~anta :ina Council is attached to this applicatiott. 4. Project Readiness a. Will the project be ready tn award a construction contract by June 30, ~0017 Please describe any evidence supporting tbI~ coueluslon~ ~Yes [3No Concepl:at tl~ib.t Ina I~een completed arid preliminao, engbteering i~' curre.d)~ Prt~,ct cot,tplelio~l ~ e.t~oected in tJw ~umm~.r of 2001. 5. Air Quality a. Does the project improve or have a neutral effect on air quality: Please describe ,any evidence supporting this conclusion. ..t Negath'e Declanttion has bee;tilled witt~ regards to t[~i.~ project. 6. Americans with Disabilities Act a, Is Ihe project, as proposed, iu compliance with the American with Disabilities Act? What evidence is there to support this claim. Please explain. · l~'Yes I-INa Co*nplia;ice will be enforced by the City's Plannitlg and Building Aget;¢),; issttanc¢ ora bldMing permit ix contit~,ent upo. fitlfillittg thir obligation. 7. Secretary of the Interiors Standards and Guidelines a. For archeologieal and histurle pre~ervatlno proJects, t~ the prnject in compliance with the Secretary of the Intertor~ Standards and Guidelines for Archealoglcal and Historic Prc~ervatI~n Pro]ect~? Please describe an}' evidence available to support this claim, 13Yes ~No 7 19 District Agreement # 12 -419 PART FIVEi EVALUATION CR1TF~RLk Pro~ram Area 2 Landscape and Other Scenic Enhancements: Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Frplain itl detail the acm,i y's pr'mary effects. General MerR Category (Maximum 40 Points} 1. Praject Readiness {9 Points) a, ls eovironmental documentation eompieted? Yex; a Negative Declaratioo has been filed, however, we are currently tatdemvay with the required 20 day public review b. 1~ ROW acquisition complete,l? Site acquisition ispart of this application and ifa sttccessftd award i$ received, land acqtdsition/R~O. W. will ensue, with scheduled completion by December 1999. c. Is prellminary englneering completed? Curreotly in proccss, Co.tpletion is expected by December 1999. 2. blatchlog Funds (9 Points) a. Whatpercentageofthematehingc0stwlllyour ageney provide above the25O/a miniature? Ottr agency will provide tho 25~ uliohtttiot matching foods. 3. Prior Commitment of Funds (8 Points} a. Are other public or private entities (excluding the applicant) contributing to the matching fonds far this project.'? List partnering entities and describe their degree of parllclpatton? No 4. Community Support (8 Points) a. Does the proposed project conform to an existing developmeut plan and/or recommendations from communiP,.' organizations regarding this area? (Explain and provide supporting documentation). Yes, Ihis project responds to communily reque.~t, via the ",~addleback l"iew Neighborhood .4ssoctatio. ; for cleamtp of thcs tmkempt property. 5. Project Merit Evaluation (6 Points) (Da not answer. Based on theprojec!'$ direc! and indirect beaefils.) Activity Specific Enhancement Division (Mnxlmum 60 Polnt~) I. ProJectSigulfieance (30 Points) n. What Is the current degree of existing landscaping and need for Improvement? .,ts stated earlier, uo landscaplog of any kind e. rist~; the site is easeotial6, "left over" land which ct~twently stands idle ax an abandon~t, desolate dirt lot between a neigfiborltood nod a masonQ, ~oundn,all along the Interstate-S freeway, 2O District Agreement # 12 -419 Becmtse of these conditions, the proporty is unattractive and a magnet to trash dumI~ing, litter attd loiterers, T/rose coedit£oos ltave oat ertl), set tire stage far tucrcascd in cidents of graffiti, but has created a potentially unsafe environment. bt a&lition, the adjacent neiglthorhood llas also had to contend with the negath:e impacts brought att by tl~e adjacent freeway and H '.r recent e. rpanMoa. ~Tte b;creased ootse, attto eod~sions attd harsh visual backdrop has adversely off octet the quality of life for local resident& Estimate lite daily number of individuals or commuuffics exposed to this project? The Saddleback Neighborhood is home to Several ltttudre;l iodividoals, man), of whoot pass by this site on a daily basis. Tlte ttont~er of freeway travelers exposed to this project on a daily basis number well into the thottsand& as b~t~rs(ate-5 i~ a major throng]re'ay bern'eeo San Di~o. ~ ~t~gel~ and ho'nod, dnrl the ~nan), citic~ ht-ba~veen. 2. Environmental (20 paints) a. Does thl.s proJect improve irr|gation efficiency and eocourage the use of alternatlve methods llke xerlseape, drought tolerant native plants, recycled water and advanced Irrigation technnlog'y to prevcut pollution? List additional features ns applicable. Drought Tolerant: Phtnt materials selected are those requiring minimal u'atering, once estatJlished. Native Plants: Plant materials selected are those that are well suited to sout/tertt California htland regions. Low Maintenance: Plant materials hnplemented will be those toast tolerant of smog and carbon dioxide attd requiring otiaimal care once establtshed. Water and l~nergy Efficiency: This project will atilize re~'cled water attd employ strict conservatiao practices throt~gh connection to the Cio,'s "Cal.?ease Computerized Irrigation ~.y.~tcm '". This higltly develot~ed system has been bt place sbtcc 1990 ami Ila$ proved to be very effective u'itlt regards to seater management. Operated~'om a central Iocatiou at t/tn CiO' 's Corporation lhrd, water usage t.v controlled, t?toaitored at~d measured daily via tnoixture sensors, master control valves. a~d an "evopo-transodttor imticator" i~talled al the sde as part of thc overall irrigation pfitn~ These devices help track water coosttmptioa and pr~veuts over-n'ate~ng by providing an atttomatic si~ml and shntoff when an abntpt change bt wat~ flow ~ detected, wItother &tn to a water lO~e break or vandalism. 3. Architectnrol Enhaucements/Public Art (10 points) a. Docs this project bring about architectural enhancements or public art? This project ix adjacent to the City'$propo*ed Free*vay ,,lrt Panel Project and is tied itt o$ part oft]tn Ci0, '~ effort to create attractive circulation corridor,~. 9 21 District Agreement # 12 -419 Septembec 2, 1999 ANA CfT'¥ 0 f ' -' ' i"/' Mr. Thoma.~ W. Wilson, Chairman O.C.T.A- 550 South Main Street Oranlie, CA-928OS SUBJECT: PATRICIA LANE SCENIC ENHANCEMENTS Dear ChaIrman WiL~on: On behalf of the City of Santa Ann, I encourage '/'our support for the Ciq,'s grant application for Transportation Enhancement Activities funding, These fund~, it'awarded, wi[[ provide scenic enhancements along Parricia Lane Avenue, which is adjacent to the Interstate-5 freeway nnd was impacted by the recently completed fieeway widening. The project Is consistent wld~ the goals et' the Ciq"s General Nan to create nttrnctive circulation corridors nnd intprove the Ciw'~ overall aesthetic quality. Your nppro'.ml et' the funding would greatly enhance the surrounding neighborhood and provide a much.needed recreational amenity for our rc.~ldcnts. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, TELEPHONE (714) 6,I?.6DOO 29. District Agreement # 12 -419 September 2, 1999 Mr. Thomas W, Wilson, Chair OCTA 550 S. Main Street Or~§e, CA 92868 Dear Mr. Wilson: I am writing on behalf of the residents of the City of Santa Ana to respectfully request your support of our funding request to assist us in the development of Patricia Lane Park. The site for the proposed park is within the bounda~'ies of my council ward and I can personally attest to the need for this facility in this area of our City. The proposed park will provide open space area for the benefit of many children and reslden~s that currently lack uccess to this t~e of recreation~ envimnmeaL This faci}i~y will have a tt~mendou~ podtive impac~ on the qua]iW of life for the constituents in tiffs area. We appreciate your assistance and support of our request. Please feel free to contact me personally at (714) 647-6900 i fi can answer any questions or provide you with an)' additional informatimt regarding the need and benel~ts of this project to our community. Sincerely, Ted Moreno Councilmember pr 23 District Agreement # 12 -419 August 30, 1999 Orange County Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street P.O. Box 14t84 Orange, California 92863-1584 SUBJECT: PATKICIA LANE SCENIC ENFL'kNCEMENTS To Whom It May Concern, On behalf of the Saddlehack View Neighborhood ,~sociat'on, I would like to encourage ,/our support of the CtrV oteSanra Ann's application for Transportation Enhancement Activities funding. The reside nt~ of the Saddleback View Neighborhood Association were adversely impac~d the recent Interstate-5 freeway widening project by the CaITrans. The property left remaining after the completion of their construerinn work appears to have been abandoned and has turned into a dumping ground, a canvas for graffiti, an eyesore and an unsafe place to be near. Out communiv/has been meeting with the City of Santa Ann quite r~:gularls' regarding the condition of this sire, and our hope for its clean.up and beautification. Your approval to provide funding for this project will be greatly appreciated .by the many residen~ of the Saddleback View Neigl~orhood. Saddleback View Neigh~rhood ~sociadon CiW of Sama Aha 24 District Agreement # 12 -419 EXHIBITS 25 District AEreement # 12 -419 COST KSll~ [Al'i Acquisition: Development: .Clearm~ 'Grufibhl&, *iand~cape LS I $25g,500 LS I $ I~OOO acre 47.$~o x.t' ~tcre 47.$50 sf ~, O00&lcre acre 4 Z J~0 sf $& O00/tlcre sf ~ L 350 .~ .451gl L~ I ~125.000 5;*-59,500 $450,000 $ io, rloo $ IO~OOO 4000 8,000 25,000 82,000 $12~ooo 33.000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $709,500 SOURCE OF FUNDS Preliminary Engineering: Acquisition & Development Fumts Coluilruclioll: ..lcqld$ition & Derelopmcnt Fumis 10 26 District Agreement # 12 -419 27 District Agreement # 12 -419 28 District Agreement # 12 -419 District AEreement # 12 -419 I SANTA ANA PARKS 1997 32 S~nltoGo Da'/Camp 33 S~rah May Downle Holt) Gcxden ~ ~urge~ 37 3O District Agreement # 12 -419 SCHEDULE Sim Environmental Studies Draft Environmental Documenl Final Environmental Document ' Begin Design Engineering Platu, Specificaiions. and Cost Estimates complete $~art Right of Way Acquisition Right of Way Certification Ready to Advertise Award Construction Project Completion (open for use) I5 31 District Agreement # 12 -se19 12-ORA Patricia Lane Scenic Enhancements in the City of Santa Ana PP NO: 9719 EA: 12-0C0800 District Agreement 12-419 Funding Source: SHOPP-TEA EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN: Description State's City's Total Estimated (SHOPP-TEA) (Local) Funds Cost for PROJECT Funds Capital R/W $ 217,000 $ 29,000 $ 246,000 Acquisition (8 Lots) Preliminary 0 $10,000 $10,000 Engineerin~ Construction $ 62,000 $ 38,000 $100,000 Engineering Capital Construction $ 254,000 $100,000 $ 354,000 TOTAL: $ 533,000 $177,000 $ 710,000 Notes: 1. In the above table, some of the values may have been rounded off to simplify the presentation 32