HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/05/1981
,I.
,.~
.
.
.
~
~
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 5, 1981
The Special Meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency of
the Ci ty of Sa n ta Ana was called to order by Cha irman Rober t
Luxembourger at 12:10 A.M.', (January 6, 1981) in the City
Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana,
Cal ifornia. After the pledge to the Flag and the Invoca tion
given by Mr. Bricken, roll was called:
PRESENT
ABSENT
Daniel Griset
Al Serra to
Gordon Br icken
James Ward
Robert Luxembourger
Harry Yamamoto
J. Odgen Markel
Others in Attendance:
Rex, Swanson, Executive Director
David N. Ream, Community Development Director
Thomas E. HammilJ1, Agency Real Estate Officer
A. J. Wilson, City Manager
Edward J. Coope~, City Attorney
Laura Garcia, Secretary
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 12:11 A.M., the Chairman recessed the Agency to an
Executive Session to discuss legal matters. At 12:15 A.M.,
the meeting was reconvend with all members present.
PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DIRECTING CONDEMNATION OF
PROPERTY WITHIN THE SUBSTITUTE PARKING SITE
Chairman Luxembourger called the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Santa Ana to order. He announced that
this was the time and place for the public hearing as
continued from November 11, 1980 and again continued from
December 15, 1980 to a special meeting of the Agency to be
held at 7:30 P.M., on January 5, 1981 on the issue of the
public necessity to acquire by condemnation property known
as Assessor Parcels 008-127-06 and 008-127-08, for
redevelopment purposes.
Chairman Luxembourger requested that Staff identify the
property or issues and give Staff recommendation. Mr.
Thomas E. HammilJ1, Agency Real Estate Office~, reported that
Staff, at the meeting of November 17, 1980, had already read
into the record the identification of the property, public
interest and necessity, greatest public good and least
private injury.
Chairman Luxembourger requested to hear from the public in
agreement and disagreement with the condemnation of this
property. Their being no comments, the Chairman closed the
.
.
.
.
7
public hearing and entertained a motion regarding the
adoption of Resolution 80-113. A motion was made by Mr.
Ward, seconded by Mr. Bricken and carried by the following
roll call vote to adopt Resolution 80-113: A RESOLUTION OF
THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY THEREFOR.
AYES:
Bricken, Griset, Ward, Serrato,
Yamamoto, Luxembourger
Markel
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DIRECTING CONDEMNATION OF
PROPERTY WITHIN THE NORTH MAIN STREET SUBSTITUTE PARKING
SITE
Chairman Luxembourger announced that this was the time and
place for the public hearing as continued from December 15,
1980 to a special meeting of the Agency to be held at 7:30
P.M., on January 5, 1981 on the issue of the public
necessity to acquire by condemnation property known as
Assessor Parcel 003-113-27, for redevelopment purposes.
Chairman Luxembourger requested that Staff identify the
property or issues and give Staff recommendation. Mr.
Thomas E. Hammill, Agency Real Estate Officer, reported that
the proper ty is loca ted on the eas t s ide of Nor th Ma in
Street approximately 103 feet north of Twentieth Street. It
has a frontage of 50 feet on Main Street with a depth of
approximately 133 feet. The property contains 6,650 square
feet and is improved with two (2) single story commercial
structures of approximately 2,131 square feet. At the
present time these two (2) structures are vacant.
The public interest and necessity require the property for
the following reasons:
1.
The City Council, at its meeting of September 2,
1980, approved and directed implementation of
the off-street Parking Management Plan for the
removal of parking from North Main Street. It
was determined at said meeting that the
acquisition and construction of a parking lot on
this parcel was essential and that City Staff
should work with the Agency on this acquisition.
2.
The Redevelopment Commission, at its meeting of
September 9, 1980, recommended that the Agency
authorize Staff to acquire this parcel.
3.
The Redevelopment Agency, at its meeting of
September 15, 1980, authorized Staff to acquire
this parcel.
The least private injury is demonstrated by the fact that
the property is currently vacant of tenants or businesses
and was previously for sale by the owner. All ownerships
will receive just compensation for the taking of their
property or their interest therein.
-2-
.
.
.
.
g
The property is necessary
following reasons:
for the project because of the
1.
It was previously determined by the City Council
on September 2, 1980 and the Agency on September
15, 1980, after considering the plan for removal
of parking along North Main Street and evidence
submitted by the Staff, that the location
proposed is the optimum location for a parking
lot cons is ten t with the demand for addi tional
off-street parking.
2.
The efficient economical use of adjacent
properties requires the acquisition of the
subject parcel.
3.
The construction of the parking lot and
subsequent use will maintain the present
patronage and employment levels of the
businesses within the effected area.
Chairman Luxembourger requested to hear from the public in
agreement and disagreement with the condemnation of this
property.
The following person appeared before the Agency to speak
against the adoption of Resolution 80-125:
Z ika Djokov ich
10901 Coronel Road
Santa Ana, CA 92705
After further discussion, Mr. Thomas E. Hammill stated that
he had a letter from Mr. Nikolic's attorneý, and that he had
requese ted tha tit be read in to the record. Cha irman
Luxembourger then reques ted tha t sa id Ie t ter be read in to
the record.
"Re:
Adoption of Resolution 80-125
"TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
"Please be advised
VIas timir Nikol id,
captioned matter.
that this office
with respect to
represen ts
the above
"On December 8, 1980, I was advised by your office
that the Agency would provide my office with a copy
of the Staff report, which purports to indicate the
necessity for taking the subject property, and that
said report would be sent within the next week.
"However, the repor t in ques tion was never sen t,
putting this office at an extreme disadvantage in
analyzing whether the publ ic in teres t would be
served by taking my client's property.
"We bel ieve the Agency breached its promise to
provide the report in question, and has made it
impossible for my client to point out why the public
interest would not be served. In particular, it is
our belief that the public interest would not be
served because of the size of the lot in question.
The subject lot will provide only a single row of
parking, whereas the adjacent lot, for example,
which is slightly larger would yield twice the
parking fo~, at most, one and one-half times the
price of my client's lot.
-3-
.
.
.
.
?
"Since we do not have the Staff repor t, it would be
useless for us to appear a t the hear ing to obj ec t to
it. We reques t, however, tha t in 1 ieu of our
personal appearance, this letter be read into the
record at such time as the matter may be heard.
"Respectfully Submitted,
L. Scott Karlin
Attorney for Vlastimir Nikolic"
Cha irman Luxembourger then s ta ted tha t he had a pe ti tion
from Mr. Chuck Lovegrove, P.O. Box 891, Santa Ana,
California, CA 92702. Mr. Hammill then told the Chairman
that Mr. Lovegrove had a lien on the property and had
requested to be heard but was not present.
After further discussion a motion was made by Mr. Bricken,
seconded by Mr. Serrato and carried unanimously to continue
the Public Hearing to adopt Resolution 80-125: A RESOLUTION
OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA
ANA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE NORTH MAIN
STREET SUBSTITUTE PARKING SITE IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY
THEREFOR until the next regularly scheduled meeting of
January 19, 1981.
PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DIRECTING CONDEMNATION OF
PROPERTY WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE SITE
A motion was made by Mr. Griseti, seconded by Chairman
Luxembourger and carried by a vote of 6:1 (Mr. Markel
casting the "NO" vote) to withdraw public hearing from
Agenda to adopt Resolution 80-101: A RESOLUTION OF THE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE DOWNTOWN PARKING
GARAGE SITE IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY THEREFOR, (The
Redevelopment Agency, at its meeting of December 19, 1980
authorized the execution of an Agreement with Lloyds Bank
which eliminated the need to adopt the above Resolution).
PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DIRECTING CONDEMNATION OF
PROPERTY WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE SITE
A motion was made by Mr. Serrato, seconded by Mr. Ward and
carried by a vote of 6:1 (Mr. Markel casting the "NO" vote)
to withdraw public hearing from Agenda to adopt Resolution
80-102: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT
PURPOSES IN THE DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE SITE IN THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR, (The Redevelopment Agencý, at its
meeting of December 15, 1980 authorized the execution of an
Agreement with Lloyds Bank which eliminated the need to
adopt the above Resolution).
-4-
.
.
.
.
If)
ADJOURNMENT
Their being no further business before the Community
Redevelopment Agency, the mee ting was adjourned at 12: 30
A.M.i, to January 19, 1981 at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council
Chambers.
;h{~
Executive Director
-5-
-- ~