HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/21/1986
.' ,
.
.
,
PI?
MINUTES
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
JANUARY 21, 1986
The Joint Regular Meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency
and the Downtown Development Commission was called to order by
Chairman Griset in the Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza,
Santa Ana, California at 5:55 P.M. Following the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag, the roll was called:
PRESENT
ABSENT
John Acosta
Daniel Griset, Chairman
Wilson Hart
P. Lee Johnson, Vice Chairman
R. E. Luxembourger
Patricia McGuigan
Dan Young
Others in attendance:
Robert C. Bobb, City Manager
Edward J. Cooper, City Attorney
Rex Swanson, Deputy City Manager/Development Services
David N. Ream, Executive Director/Economic Development
Robert Hoffman, Real Estate Manager
Mellmary McNeely, Agency Secretary
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
At 5:58 P.M., the meeting was adjourned to Executive Session.
The Agency Secretary read the following public statement prior to
the closed session: "THE LEGAL COUNSEL REQUESTS THAT THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SEC. 54956.9(A) TO CONFER WITH ITS ATTORNEY
REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION WHICH HAS BEEN INITIATED FORMALLY,
AND TO WHICH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IS A PARTY. THE TITLES OF
THE LITIGATIONS ARE :(1) CRA vs. SNOOOZ SHOP; (2) CRA vs DANLAR
INDUSTRIES; (3) ALLIANCE vs CRA."
"THE LEGAL COUNSEL REQUESTS THAT THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECESS
TO CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 TO
GIVE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CITY'S NEGOTIATOR REGARDING NEGOTIATIONS
WITH: (1) MR. DAN BERTO, CONCERNING THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 506 E. 2ND ST.; AND (2) LEAH CASPARI, CONCERNING THE
PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 115 E. BACHMAN DRIVE."
The Agency Members returned to the Council Chambers at 7:00 P.M.
with all those formerly present in attendance.
1
.
.
,
. ,
MINUTES
It was moved by Vice Chairman Johnson, seconded by Agency Member
McGuigan and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency approve
the Minutes of the Adjourned Joint Meeting of the Community
Redevelopment Agency held December 3, 1985 and the Joint Special
Meeting held December 16, 1985,and approve the Minutes for the
Regular Meeting of the Downtown Development Commssion held on
November 26, 1985.
PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 85-58 DIRECTING CONDEMNATION
OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE A-14 REDEVELOPMENT SITE (304 AND 308 EAST
FIFTH STREET, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 398-326-01) AND (316 FIFTH
STREET AND 416 NORTH FRENCH STREET, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.
398-326-03)
Chairman Griset declared the Public Hearing open on the issue of
the public necessity to acquire by condemnation properties
identified by Assessor Parcel Numbers, as Book 398, Page and
Block 326, Parcel 01; and as Book 398, Page and Block 326,
Parcel 03 for redevelopment purposes. He then asked staff to
identify the properties and the project and to comment on the
factors and evidence necessitating the condemnation action. He
requested that staff set forth why the public interest and
necessity require the project; why the project is planned or
located in the manner that will be most compatible with greatest
public good and the least private injury; why the properties
sought to be acquired are necessary for the project; and, whether
or not the offers as required by Section 7267.2 of the Government
Code have been made to the owners of record or any offer has not
been made because the owners cannot be located with reasonable
diligence.
The Real Estate Manager, Mr. Robert Hoffman, made a slide
presentation showing the area in question. He stated that the
A-14 site has been designated as the location for a parking
structure which will provide public parking for the Fiesta
Marketplace development, First American Title and the Pacific
Telephone Company and other properties in the area. He pointed
out that half of the site is owned by the City of Santa Ana and
that public necessity supports the construction of this public
parking structure since parking in the area is already at a
premium and the new Fiesta Marketplace development will soon be
operational. He added that offers of just compensation have been
made and that staff feels that the businesses affected by the
proposed eminent domain action will relocate within the city.
In response to a query from the Chairman of the Agency, the
Agency Secretary stated that there were no written communications
recei ved.
The Chairman then stated that the Agency would like to hear from
those people who desired to address the Agency on the issue. He
-2-
$-
.
.
.
added that if anyone desired to address the Agency, they should
step forward to the podium and give their name and address. He
requested that they limit their comments to five minutes and
identify to which property their comments pertained. He added
that they should keep in mind the requirements of Section
1245.124 of the Code of Civil Procedure that comments should only
address the following four issues:
1.
Whether the public interest and necessity require the
project;
2.
Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that
will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the
least private injury;
3.
Whether the properties sought to be acquired are necessary
for the project; or
4.
Whether an offer, as required by Section 7267.2 of the
Government Code has been made to the record owner.
There being no comments from the public, Agency Members or Agency
staff the Chairman declared that motions were now in order to
adopt Resolution Numbers 85-58 and 85-59.
It was moved by Agency Member Luxembourger, seconded by Agency
Member McGuigan and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency
adopt Resolution No. 85-58: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 304 AND 308 EAST FIFTH STREET IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FOR
DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY
THEREFOR.
It was moved by Agency Member Luxembourger, seconded by Agency
Member McGuigan and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency
adopt Resolution No. 85-59; A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 316 EAST FIFTH STREET AND 416 NORTH FRENCH STREET IN THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR.
Agency Member Hart left the Council Chambers at 7:15 P.M. and
returned at 7:20 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DIRECTING CONDEMNATION OF
PROPERTY WITHIN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE: 2657 NORTH MAIN STREET;
2643 NORTH MAIN STREET; 115 EAST BACHMAN DRIVE; 120 EAST BACHMAN
DRIVE; 120 EAST OWENS DRIVE; 124 EAST OWENS DRIVE; 204 EAST OWENS
DRIVE; 214 EAST OWENS DRIVE; 218 EAST OWENS DRIVE.
Chairman Griset declared the Public Hearing on the issue of the
-3-
r;
r .
.
.
.
public necessity to acquire by condemnation properties identified
by Assessor Parcel Numbers, as Book 003, Page and Block 012,
Parcels 02, 04, 11, 15, 16, 17, 24 and as Book 003, Page and
Block 013, Parcels 01 and 15, for redevelopment purposes. He
asked that staff identify the properties and the project and to
comment on the factors and evidence necessitating the
condemnation action. He requested that staff set forth why the
public interest and necessity require the project; why the
project is planned or located in the manner that will be most
compatible with the greatest public good and the least private
injury; why the properties sought to be acquired are necessary
for the project; and, whether or not the offers as required by
Section 7267.2 of the Government Code have been made to the
owners of record, or any offer has not been made because the
owners cannot be located with reasonable diligence.
The Real Estate Manager, Mr. Robert Hoffman, made a slide
presentation in whch he presented an overview of the area around
the C-7 development site, showing the location of the various
properties: the Horowitz property to the north; Town and Country;
C-5 site; C-8 site (Bekin's and Barkers' buildings). He stated
that the area was rapidly developing into a commercial area with
several attractive, new developments. He also made a slide
presentation showing how Owens Drive will be widened and
explained that all of the houses on the north side of Owens Drive
will be required for the widening and that any land that is not
used will probably be added to the Horowitz site. He added that
the City would only have to acquire three additional sites on the
north side of Owens Drive. He pointed out that the Agency had
closed the KLST acquisition which is a part of the Fashion Square
development. He showed slides of the residential property in the
area and stated that the Agency had nine parcels to acquire in
the C-7 development site. He added that, even though the Agency
had reached agreements with Some of the owners, staff felt it was
prudent to proceed with condemnation actions on all nine parcels
in the event some of the escrows did not close. He pointed out
that the development would be a 220,000 square foot, 20-story
office building and that the entire site will cover 4.7 acres
when assembled. He added that staff hoped to be able to convey
the site to the developer by June, 1986. He stated that, in
staff's opinion, the area was changing rapidly to commercial
use and that it was inevitable that the property within the C-7
site should also become commercial. He pointed out that among
the economic benefits of the proposed commercial development
would be the creation of new jobs and the augmentation and
supplementation of ongoing development activities in the area.
He added that this development would also serve as an anchor, in
conjunction with commercial redevelopment of downtown Santa Ana,
for the development of the Main Street commercial corridor. He
added that all of the owners affected by the proposed development
in the C-7 site had been offered just compensation and that the
developer is contributing relocation benefits to those living
within the site on properties acquired directly by the developer.
He stated that the development had gone through all proper city
-4-
1
~..
departments, commissions and boards.
.
In response to a query from the Chairman, the Agency Secretary
stated that there were no written communications regarding this
matter.
The Chairman then stated that the Agency would like to hear from
those people who wished to address the Agency on this issue and
asked them to give their names and addresses and limit their
comments to five minutes. He also asked them to keep in mind the
requirements of Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure
and asked them to limit their comments to the following four
issues:
1.
Whether the public interest and necessity require the
project;
2.
Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that
will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the
least private injury;
3.
Whether the properties sought to be acquired are necessary
for the project; or
.
4.
Whether an offer, as required by Section 7267.2 of the
Government Code, has been made to the record owner.
The following people spoke in opposition to the C-7 Development
Site:
Joe Hamann, 213 Owens Drive
Marilyn Hayward, 119 E. Owens Drive
The Chairman then called for comments from the Agency Members.
Agency Members Hart, Young and Luxembourger all stated that, in
their opinion, staff should proceed to acquire those properties
on the north side of Owens Drive which were being adversely
impacted by the C-7 development and that the payment of
relocation payments to these people should be treated as a
a matter of policy.
After a lengthy discussion, Chairman Griset and all of the Agency
Members agreed that they would like staff to present a policy
statement on the payment of relocation payments in instances such
as the one presented on the north side of Owens Drive.
.
Chairman Griset then stated that, if there were no further
questions, comments or discussion as to whether the public
interest and necessity require the proposed project, whether the
project is planned and located in a manner that will be most
compatible with the greatest public good and least private
injury, whether the properties sought to be acquired are
necessary for the project, or whether an offer has been made to
-5-
~
I '
the owners of record, motions were in order to adopt Resolutions
86-01 through 86-09.
.
It was moved by Agency Member Luxembourger, seconded by Agency
Member McGuigan and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency:
Adopt Resolution Resolution No. 86-01: A RESOLUTION OF THE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE
IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE
PUBLIC NECESSITY THEREFOR (2657 NORTH MAIN STREET).
Adopt Resolution No. 86-02: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR (2643 NORTH MAIN STREET).
Adopt Resolution No. 86-03: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA
ANA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE
IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE
PUBLIC NECESSITY THEREFOR (115 EAST BACHMAN DRIVE).
.
Adopt Resolution No. 86-04: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR (120 EAST BACHMAN DRIVE).
Adopt Resolution No. 86-05: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR (120 EAST OWENS DRIVE).
Adopt Resolution No. 86-06: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR (124 EAST OWENS DRIVE).
.
Adopt Resolution No. 86-07: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR (204 EAST OWENS DRIVE).
-6-
c¡
I .
.
Adopt Resolution No. 86-08: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR (214 EAST OWENS DRIVE).
Adopt Resolution No. 86-09: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE C-7 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC
NECESSITY THEREFOR (218 EAST OWENS DRIVE).
Chairman Griset then declared the public hearing closed
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR LA BONITA SITE
It was moved by Agency Member McGuigan, seconded by Agency
Member Johnson and carried unanimously (7:0) that Agency
authorize staff to issue a Request for Proposals for development
of the La Bonita site with a low density single-family
residential project.
.
DEFERRED LOAN - BUILDERS EXCHANGE ASSOCIATES, 202-210 NORTH MAIN
STREET
It was moved by Agency Member McGuigan, seconded by Agency
Member Hart and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency
approve a Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Agreement totaling
$49,322 with the Builders Exchange Associates which will allow
the refinancing of the Agency's $44,711 deferred loan with
accrued interest at 10 percent.
APPROVAL OF PAYMENT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT
THE SANTA ANA AUTO CENTER
In response to questions from Agency Member Acosta, the Real
Estate Manager stated that there was a staff member and a
representative of the Fire Department present to monitor the
removal of the contaminated soil and contents of the underground
tanks located at 2051 East Edinger and 1535 South Trotter Avenue.
He added that a member of the Real Estate Staff monitored each
truckload and signed a manifest as each truck left the site.
.
In response to a further question from Agency Member Acosta, the
Real Estate Manager stated that it was necessary to rent a
crane when the hole, resulting from the removal of contaminated
soil, became 40 feet deep because the City staff did not feel
that it would be safe for a tractor to continue to work in the
hole due to its depth and the low flash point of the soil. He
pointed out that the Fire Department was monitoring the work and
felt that the soil should be removed deep enough so that the
water table would not be further contaminated. He added that the
-7-
It)
I .
.
.
.
problem was so severe that a pump may have to be installed for
on-going recovery of gasoline residue from the water table. The
Real Estate Manager stated that staff would initiate an action
against Chevron because they failed to reveal that such a problem
existed and because the contamination reduces the value of the
property.
Agency Member Acosta asked if staff had asked for an estimate
from G. W. Rowe before authorizing the additional work and rental
of equipment. The Real Estate Manager stated that it was a
day-to-day operation in which the Fire Department inspected the
soil as it was removed and instructed them to continue digging.
Agency Member Acosta stated
magnitude of this operation
brought it to the attention
the excavation and that, in
ask the contractor to set a
additional work.
that he was disturbed by the
and felt that staff should have
of the Agency before proceeding
the future, staff should
maximum cost before authorizing
with
Agency Member Young asked that staff keep the Agency appraised of
the status of the litigations brought against Chevron.
After further discussion, it was moved by Vice Chairman Johnson,
seconded by Agency Member Young and carried by a vote of 6:1
(Agency Member Acosta voted "NO") that the Agency authorize the
Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency to issue a
purchase order for the demolition of improvements and removal of
contaminated soil and contents of underground tanks located at
2051 East Edinger Avenue and 1535 South Trotter Avenue to G. W.
Rowe, General Contractor, in the amount of $203,004.50 plus
interest of $612.50.
AMENDMENT TO DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE A-13
SITE
It was moved by Agency Member McGuigan, seconded by Agency
Member Luxembourger and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency
amend Section 204 of the Disposition and Development Agreement
with Lowy Development Corp. extending the deadline for submission
of the Letter of Credit to July 1, 1986.
GRANTING OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE TO DUQUESNE PROPERTIES
FOR MASTER PLAN IN THE INTER-CITY AREA
Agency Member Young stated that at a recent meeting of the
Economic Development Sub-Committee, the proposed exclusive right
to negotiate for a master plan in the Inter-City Area had been
discussed at length, and that he felt that there were enough
concerns expressed to warrant asking that the Agency continue
this item to a future meeting. He added that he felt staff
should once again confer with community members to be sure that
they were in agreement with the granting of an exclusive right to
negotiate to Duquesne Properties for a master plan in the
-8-
/J
r .
, ,
.
.
.
Inter-City Area.
After a discussion period, it was moved by Agency Member Young,
seconded by Agency Member Acosta and carried unanimously (7:0)
that the Agency item, "Granting of Exclusive Right to Negotiate
to Duquesne Properties for Master Plan in Inter-City Area", be
continued to a future Agency meeting and that the Agency instruct
staff to meet with members of the Inter-City community to
ascertain their reactions to this proposal.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - A-9 SITE - PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY DEPOT
The Agency unanimously (7:0) authorized the Chairman to execute a
letter to the State Historic Preservation Officer opposing
nomination of the Pacific Electric Railway Depot to the National
Register of Historic Places.
AGENCY AGENDA ITEMS
It was moved by Agency Member McGuigan, seconded by Agency
Member Young and carried (6:1 - Vice Chairman Johnson voting
"NO") that the staff presentation on the stadium replacement
sites to the Orange County Harbor and Parks Commission, scheduled
for January 22, 1986, be delayed 30 days.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
It was moved by Agency Member Young, seconded by Agency Member
Hart and carried unanimously (7:0) that the litigation of Agency
vs Snoooz Shop be settled for $130,000, plus interest.
It was moved by Agency Member Young, seconded by Agency Member
Luxembourger and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency ratify
a final goodwill offer to Danlar Industries in the amount of
$230,000, plus interest.
It was moved by Agency Member McGuigan, seconded by Agency
Member Luxembourger and carried unanimously (7:0) that the
Agency authorize settlement and purchase of the Gertrude Nance
property for $112,500.
It was moved by Agency Member Young, seconded by Agency Member
McGuigan and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency authorize
settlement and purchase of the Lenore Sproul property for
$115,000.
It was moved by Agency Member Luxembourger, seconded by Agency
Member McGuigan and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency
authorize settlement and purchase of the Leah Cas pari property
for $140,000.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Agency, the
-9-
/";'"
..~ . "
.
.
.
. .
meeting was adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
~
Daniel E. Griset
Chairman
-10-
~~
Executive Director
I~