Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-18 CRA , ~" ...,' . .-, . (e .. RESOLUTION NO, 74-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF REAL PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOP- MENT PURPOSES, SPECIFICALLY PUBLIC IMPROVEMÉNTS, FACILITIES AND UTILITIES, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROSS STREET BETWEEN FIFTH STREET AND SANTA ANA BOULEVARD BE IT RESOLVED: That the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana does hereby find and declare that the public interest and necessity require that for redevelopment purposes, specifically public improvements, facilities or utilities, the hereinbelow described real property be condemned, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That such acquisition is done in a manner consistent with the greatest public good and the least private injury. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the attached map be entered as Exhibit A and be used as an illustration of the hereinbelow described property: Parcell: All those portions of the Birch Addition and the Hickeys', Andrews' and Crane's Addition in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California as shown on maps recorded in Book 3 Page 145 and Book 5 Page 352, respectively, Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot 4 of said Birch Addition; thence along the South line of said Lot 4, South 89° 37' 00" West a distance of 36,82 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Easterly having a radius of 45,00 feet; thence North- erly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 139° 08' 33"; an arc distance of 109.28 feet to a tangent line being the Southeast line of Santa Ana Boulevard as described in Parcel 8 of the deed recorded December 18,1968 in Book 8819 Page 934, Official Records of Orange County, California; thence along said tangent line North 48° 45' 33" East, a distance of 70,68 feet to its intersection with the Westerly prolongation of the South line of Lot 6, Block "C", of said Hickeys', Andrews' and Crane's Addition; thence along said Westerly prolongation and the South line of said Lot 6, North 89° 37' 42" East, a distance of 14,43 feet to its intersection with the Northerly prolongation and the East line of said Lot 4; thence along said Northerly prolongation and the East line of said Lot 4, South 0° 21' 39" West, a distance of 125,28 feet to the point of beginning, Parcel 2: An easement for ingress and egress over those portions of Lot 3 of the Birch Addition to Santa Ana, as per map recorded in Book 3 Page 145 of MiscelJaneous Re- , cords, in the Office of the County Recordèr of Los Ange- les County, and of Lot 9 in Block "c" of Hickeys', Andrews' and Crane's Addition to Santa Ana, as per map recorded in Book 5 Page 352 of Miscellaneous Records in the Office of the County Recorder of said Los Angeles County, California all located in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California and described as follows: eRA-Ie) ;.:. ,~~'-' . .. " . RESOLUTION NO. 74-18 PAGE TWO Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Lot 3¡ thence North 65.00 feet along the We~ line of said Lot 3 and the Northerly prolongation thereof¡ thence East 9.00 feet¡ thence South 65.00 feet parallel with said West line of said Lot 3 and said prolongation thereof to the South line of said Lot 37 thence West 9.00 feet to the point of beginning. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Conununity Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana at its regular ~eeting held on the 9th" day of October , 1974. ATTEST: -2~ .J(. W~ CLERK OF TH AGENCY STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF SANTA ANA 1 L ) ss I, FLORENCE I. MALONE, do hereby certify that I am the Clerk of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana; that the foregoing Resolution was introduced to said Agency at its regular ~eeting held on the' 9'th day of October , 1974, and was at said ~eeting passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES, NOES: Yamamoto, Garthe, Patterson, Evans Ward None MEMBERS, MEMBERS, ABSENT, Griset, Markel ~S ~~".'p'.{J1~ CLERK OJ!' THE AGENCY APPROVED AS TO FORM: CRA-IO 'Redevelopment Agency Date October 7. 1974 MÈMORANDUM ~ , . < , To': F,om: Subject: . ~ Executive Director CONDEMNATION ùF PROPERTY Background Redevelopment staff, in conjunction with the Attorney's Office, has been negotiating with Jack Stanley and Michael Doyle in order to purchase their property parcel #008-051-16 at Santa Ana Boulevard and Ross. As you know, staff strongly recommends that purchase of this parcel is necessary in order to assure proper development around Civic Center, The use suggested by Stanley (a 5,000 sq, ft, office structure) is clearly an inappropriate land use for this area. We feel the parcel should be held for future civic center expansion so that Civic Center is focused toward our downtown rather than allowed to spread in a linear fashion toward Bristol. Attached to the memo is a letter stating our offer to purchase the property. In a prior meeting Stanley rejected this offer. At this point, staff recommends that an action of condemnation against this property should be filed immediately. Recommendation Adopt Resolution 74-18 approving the filing of condemnation against the Stanley/Doyle property. (t~f,~tn Richard E. Goblirsch Executive Director ACTION OF COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ~~--.J{~ ')~-,i'. _u.--.---------- /o/t; 17<1 DATE ~ JX.ll(Q ~ SEC¡iETARY C!¡(/J-/o ~_. . - . - .~ ,'.' - ., f S8pt8lber 27, 1974 Mr. Jack Stanley 106 W. Pourth Str_t SaDta Ana, California 92701 Dear Mr. Stanley I With regard. to property owned by you aDd Mr. Michael DOyle (aDd çoues) located at the H. B. corner of FUth and aoas streets in the City of Santa Ana (a.s.ssor description A.P. 110. 08-051-16), please be advlsea that th18 8g'ency staDds ready to acquire said property for the .. of tbirtr-nine thousand dollars.in cuh. We anticipate having' authority to aequtre thu property on october 9, 1974 and 8\JbMquently. should a tiae delay in any way 1nc:ODvenience you, . we stand ready to acquire the property 1mIDediately. As we ba¥e di8CW1Sea on .."..al oec:a8iOlUJ, the property in question u.needed for the aueeessful iapl888ntation of the renewal of the project area aDd our appraisal of the property indicates this offer to be the falr II81'ket value. In addition to the value offered we are a180 prepared to pay all DOftIal cl08ing' costa in connectlon wlth the property and are further prepared to enter into escrow baediately. As dlaoused at our last meeting of 8ept..œr 26th. we do w18h to br1ng' thi8 ..tter to a close aa rapidly as po881ble and know thi8 is your desire a180. We w111 be d18CW1S1ng' this with the Redevelopllent Agency at our ft8'Xt regular meet1nc¡ of October 9th. we are sorry that we haven' t been able to bring this to a conclusion aautually agreeable to both parties but please f"l free to call \18 at any tilDe and ccmaider thls offer open until revOked by writing. S1acerely, Rich.ard B. Gobl1r8Ch Bxecutlve Director C!..I( if-tO