HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-44 CRA
EJC:sc
8/29/79
RESOLUTION NO. 79-44
...
A RESOLUTioN OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF .1ME CITY OF SANTA ANA MAKING'
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR THE
PROPOSED FIRST AMENDMENT TO PARTICIPATIPN
AGREEMENT BETWEtN'THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOP-
MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND
STEVEN J. KEISER AND PAULA B. KEISER FOR
THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THAT, CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY IN THE SANTA ANA REDEVELOP-
MENT PROJECT.
",
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Santa Ana has prepared an initial study of the environmental
impact of the proposed First Amendment to participation Agreement
between the Agency and Steven J. Keiser and Paula B. Keiser; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has reviewed and considered the
above said initial study and the final Environmentaþ Impact Report
for the Santa Ana Redevelopment Plan; and
.
WHEREAS, the Agency has found on the basis of the initial
study that the environmental impact of the proposed First Amendment
to Participation Agreement is essentially the same as in the pre-
vious Environmental Impact Reports; and that there is no additional
information or data available requiring supplementation of the
previous Environmental Impact Reports; and
WHEREAS, said Initial Study conforms to the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources
Code, Section 21000 et ~,) the "Guidelines for the Implementation
of the California EnVIronmental Quality Act of 1970," as amended,
adopted by the Secretary for Resources of the State of California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 adopted by resolution of the
Agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS:
The Agency hereby finds and determines that:
.
1. Neither the approval nor the implementation of the
proposed First Amendment to Participation Agreement will cause
substantial changes in the Redevelopment Project, or with respect
to the circumstances under which the Project is to be undertaken,
which will require major revisions in the Environmental Impact
Reports previously adopted for the Project due to the involvement
of new environmental impacts not covered in said previous Environ-
mental Impact Reports.
2. No new information of substantial importance to the
project has become available which shows that the project will
have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in
the Environmental Impact Report; or that significant effects pre-
viously examined will be more severe than shown in the Environ-
mental Impact Report; or that mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and
would substantially reduce one or, more significant effects of the
project; or that mitigation measures or alternatives which were
not previously considered in the Environmental Impact Report would
substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the environ-
ment.
.
(¿,!
IB
/8
.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-44
PAGE TWO
3. The proposed action will have no significant effect
on the environment, except as identified and considered in the
previous Environmental Impact Reports.
ADOPTED this l7th day of
the following vote:
September
,1979, by
AYES:
MEMBERS: Bricken, Griset, Luxembourger, Serrato, Ward,
Yamamoto, Markel (purusant to Sec. 6, Art. 3)
MEMBERS: None
NOES:
ABSENT:
MEMBERS: None
ATTEST:
t
R~~~
Executive Director/
ReCording Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~
KEITH L. GOW
Agency Legal Counsel
(00<.
~~~
CHAIRMAN
lB