HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-01 CRA
, ,
RESOLUTION NO. 79-1
.
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA MAKING ENVIRON-
MENTAL FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED PARTI-
CIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOP-
MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA A,N D DR. STEVEN
J. KEISER AND PAULA B. KEISER FOR THE SALE AND
DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE SANTA
ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Santa Ana has prepared an Initial Study of the environmental impact
of the proposed Participation Agreement between the Agency and Dr.
Steven J. Keiser and Paula B. Keiser; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has reviewed and considered the above
said Initial Study and the Final Environmental Impact Report for
the Santa Ana Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has found on the basis of the Initial
Study that the environmental impact of the proposed Agreement is
. essentially the same as in the previous Environmental Impact Report;
and that there is no additional information or data available re-
quiring supplementation of the previous Environmental Impact Report;
and
WHEREAS, said Initial Study conforms to the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources
Code, Section 21000 et seq.), the "Guidelines for the Implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970", as amended,
adopted by the Secretary for Resources of the State of California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 adopted by resolution of the Agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS:
The Agency hereby finds and determines that:
1. Neither the approval nor the implementation of the proposed
Agreement will cause substantial changes in the Redevelopment Project,
or with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is to be
undertaken, which will require major revisions in the Environmental
. Impact Reports previously adopted for the Project due to the involve-
ment of new environmental impacts not covered in said previous
Environmental Impact Reports.
2. No new information of substantial importance to the project
has become available which shows that the project will have one or more
significant effects not discussed previously in the Environmental Impact
Report; or that significant effects previously examined will be more
severe than shown in the Environ~ental Impact Report; or that mitigation
measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in
fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects of the project; or that mitigation measures or alternatives
which were not previously considered in the Environmental Impact Report
would substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the
environment.
.
57J
7!
.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-1
PAGE TWO
3. The proposed action will have no significant effect on
the environment, except as identified and considered in the previous
Environmental Impact Reports.
ADOPTED this ~ day of
the following vote:
AYES:
MEMBERS:
NOES:
MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
,,!::~
Executive Director/
Recording Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~
KEITH L. GOW, Agency legal
Counsel
,January
, 1979 by
Brandt, Bricken, Evans, Garthe, Ortiz
Ward, Yamamoto
None
None
a; [) .q~n~
CHAIRJoIAN
51
7A