The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About FULL PACKET_2005-03-21 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT/CODE ENFORCEMENT Adjourned Meeting Minutes September 28, 2004 CALL TO ORDER The meeting convened at 5:34 p.m. in Room 831 of City Hall. ATTENDANCE The following Councilmembers were present: Lisa Bist and Alberta Christy Staff present were: Dave Ream, City Manager; Jim Ross, Executive Director/Public Works Agency; Kenneth Adams, Assistant Director/Planning and Building Agency; Ben Kaufman, Chief Assistant City Attorney; Bruce Dunams, Community Preservation Manager; Manuel Gomez, Transportation Manager; Teri Cable, Administrative Services Manager; and Mary Gonzales, Projects Manager. AGENDA ITEMS 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Approved by a vote of 2:0 A. April 27, 2004 Regular Meeting B. May 25, 2004 Special Meeting C. June 22, 2004 Meeting Cancelled D. August 24,2004 Meeting Cancelled 2. BANNERS ALONG HUTTON CENTRE Staff presentation by Mary Gonzales and Teri Cable intended to receive Committee support to permit the installation of banners on public light standards along the public right of way in the Hutton Centre area. Staff brought the issue to the Committee since current public policy was to only permit non-profit charitable organizations the right to place banners on public light standards. Ms. Jody Coats and Ms. Jami Small representing CB Richard Ellis and Hutton Centre Business association provided a package of material identifying the banners requested by the group. Mr. Kaufman asked the Committee to allow him to determine if it were legally appropriate to respond in this forum. He also asked if the association would consider installing stanchions on private property thereby making the issue a land use matter which would be referred to the Planning Commission. The item was continued to the next meeting. 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT STAFFING Bruce Dunams presented an overview of the adjustments to code enforcement staffing made since the fiscal year budget adjustments and retirements that recently occurred in the community preservation division. He explained in detailed how the workload has been redistributed over the existing staffing with emphasis on maintaining priority within the neighborhoods and the proactive code enforcement efforts. 13C-1 Public comments focused upon debris accumulation on the streets and sidewalks of the business areas particularly South Main and South Bristol Streets. Committee determination was that staff would prepare appropriate correspondence to the business merchants to stress a clean up program for the street and sidewalk areas adjacent to their properties. Committee determined that a work effort with the Chamber of Commerce to develop a clean up campaign for the business community. 4. LOCOMOTIVE HORNS AND QUIET ZONES Manuel Gomez provided the Committee with an update on the status of locomotive horns and noise reduction issues associated with reducing the sound pollution caused by the use of train horns adjacent to city's neighborhoods. He presented a series of alternative strategies all of which ultimately must address the issue of liability as relates to safety. If the city is willing to make certain improvements and accept a negotiated liability strategy, then a sound attenuation program could be put into place. Mr. Gomez determined that staff would need additional time to study both the liability and railroad crossing improvements that would have to be put into place before the Committee could make any serious policy input. The item was continued to the next meeting. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS Evangeline Gawronski inquired if winter hours would be observed during the enforcement of mobile vending ordinance. The issue will be referred to the City Council for determination. Dave Lopez commented that parking signs were disappearing on the Harbor Boulevard corridor along with required off street parking for many of the automotive retail lots. A response to the issue was requested. 6. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - None 7. ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING A. Banners Along Hutton Centre B. Locomotive Hours and Quiet Zones 8. NEXT MEETING DATE: Tuesday, October 26,2004 ADJOURNMENT -7:45 P.M. ~~ Kenneth Adams Assistant Director/ Planning & Building Agency S:Council CommINlCE CClNICE Minutes 09-28-04 Adjourned Mtg. Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement Council Committee Minutes 2 September 28. 2004 13C-2 CITY OF SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT MINUTES January 19, 2005 CALL TO ORDER The meeting convened at 5:47 p.m. in City Hall, Room 831, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. ATTENDANCE City Council Committee members present: Council member Lisa Bist, Councilmember Jose Solorio and Councilmember Claudia Alvarez. Staff members present: Community Development Agency Executive Director Patricia C. Whitaker, Chief Assistant City Attorney Benjamin Kaufman, Senior Planner Sergio Klotz, Community Preservation Inspector Alvaro Nunez, Downtown Development Manager Matthew Lamb. Community members present: Tim Rush. AGENDA ITEMS 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - September 15, 2004 Action: The minutes were approved 2:0 2. PROPOSED CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS La Casa de Ceramica at 2431 S. Main Street has a new manager. In the last few weeks, it has incurred $1,500 in fines from Code Enforcement. Downtown is now getting citations rather then warnings. Discussion ensued regarding the ARCO station and the auction. Lisa requested an update by Alvaro. Alvaro passed out pictures on the Spurgeon Building and the conditions that were seen during the inspection on Wednesday, January 12, 2005. Owner of the property gave consent in writing to Code Enforcement to inspect the property. The types of violations on the property were damage to some areas and deferred maintenance issues. There are approximately 60 units in the building with 50% 13C-3 occupancy. There were units that had evidence of people living in them. Jose Solorio asked how the City could control the parties/raves that are happening after hours. The Police Department has been informed of the after-hours activity and will be taking the appropriate actions. Tim Rush commented on how the owner of the property needs to sell the property to a developer that has the capabilities to rehabilitate this magnificent historical building into an official live/work site for Downtown. The current property owner does as little as possible to maintain the property. The property owner can do a cease and desist for the people living in the building, and have them out of there in 90 days. 3. DOWNTOWN BID UPDATE All relevant information was presented to Council at the January 18, 2005 meeting in a public setting. No additional update was presented. 4. PROJECT UPDATES a) SWC First and Main Streets - Oriqinal Mike's - The Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the restaurant. The apartment units have some remaining items that need to be addressed prior to a final sign-off. b) City Place - Going to City Council on February 7 as a public hearing item with all the actions and environmental documents c) YMCA- Previous discussions in City Council Closed Session prompted questions on both proposals that were presented. Staff has met with both developers to discuss the concerns raised by City Council and both developers agreed to re-submit their proposals. The two revised proposals will be sent to Keyser Marston for their review and then brought back to a closed session for City Council. d) Court of Appeals- All relevant information was presented to Council at the January 18, 2005 meeting in a public setting. No additional updated was presented. City Council Committee on Main Street Development ~ Minutes 2 January 19, 2005 13C-4 e) 4th Street Pushcart Status - The bid for the production of the carts came in at $124,000. The bids came in higher because of the rise in steel costs. The City would like to modify the settlement agreement and the City Attorney's office has been in contact with operator's attorney who is in agreement with the proposed terms and conditions. The modification to the terms and conditions will be an agreement on the specifications, standards and the manufacturer of the vendor cart with the increase in the cost of the carts being covered by the City. The difference would be $28,000, which may increase slightly since the bid expired at the end of December. The next step is to get the modification to the agreement formalized and approved by City Council. Once approved by City Council, the carts will be produced at a rate of two carts every six weeks. f) Sav-On Lofts - Planning staff will be visiting the site on Friday, January 21, 2005 to do the final for planning. The Charles Company has engaged Tanya Weeks, Realtor, to lease the property. g) Sycamore Garaqe Landscapinq - The parking lot improvements have been completed and signed off by the Planning Division. The monthly parking fee is now being released. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Tim Rush commented that the Spurgeon Building needs to be sold to a developer who can do a reuse project. The owner is not the type of owner that benefits the Downtown, especially in such a landmark facility. 6. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - Jose Solorio asked about the status of South Main Street steam cleaning and banners for the street. Staff informed the Committee that the issue was put on hold due to the lack of funds to cover the cleaning. Matt Lamb will bring the information back to the Committee next month. Jose Solorio asked about the status of occupancy for the Spurgeon Building. Staff will investigate and report to Committee in two months. City Council Committee on Main Street Development .. Minutes 3 January 19, 2005 13C-5 7. ITEMS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS a. Spurgeon Building b. South Main Street Sidewalk Cleaning and Banner costs 8. NEXT MEETING - February 16, 200S ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 6:49 p.m. to February 16, 2005. cf!L ~ {JKti Patricia C. Whitaker Recording Secretary Community Development Agency PCW /If City Council Committee on Main Street Development - Minutes 4 January 19, 2005 13C-6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ~ ~ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY UPDATE ".,>.'v I /' ~L~/{}r2~ CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Manager to update the Administrative policies to allow restricted usage of city-issued credit cards. DISCUSSION In early 1993, the City Council adopted a number of general administrative policies regarding the expenditure of City funds. As a result, the use of credit cards was basically restricted to limited activities within the Purchasing Division. During the past decade, the evolution of the private sector's business procedures, especially the use of the internet, has directly impacted the interactions with general City operations. In order to promote efficiencies and to allow more effective operations in the processing of travel and other city transactions, it is necessary to update the administrative policies to expand the allowable usages of city- issued credit cards. Additionally, as the City is in the process of requesting bids for general banking services, the inclusion of credit card services in the banking package will result in very competitive credit card interest rates . Given these circumstances, it is recommended that the administrative policies be updated to allow the City Manager to develop provisions concerning proper usage and accountability measures, and to approve the issuance of city credit cards. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. -=\~~~.-=:> ~ ,*~. Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 19C-1 19C-2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ~ ~ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 APPROVED TITLE: APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT ACCEPTING SANTA ANA'S FOCUSED ENFORCEMENT TEAM GRANT FUNDING D As Recommended D As Amended D Ordinance on 151 Reading D Ordinance on 2nd Reading D Implementing Resolution D Set Public Hearing For I I ) p.() // . / / ~C-::~ U;,. / 0 'u <-C<.-~ CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the Chief of Police to execute a grant award agreement with the Office of Emergency Services (OES). 2. Approve an Appropriation Adjustment recognizing the Office of Emergency Services Grant funds in the amount of $95,701 and the required matching funds of $31,900 from the Police Department Crimes Against Persons Other Contractual Services Account, for a total project amount of $127,601, and appropriate same into the FY 2005 Santa Ana's Focused Enforcement Team Grant expenditure accounts. 3. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Community Services Program Inc., Family Violence Victim Services, to operate a domestic violence victim advocacy program for one year in an amount not to exceed $55,112. DISCUSSION The California Office of Emergency Services has awarded the Police Department grant funding in the amount of $95,701 for the Santa Ana's Focused Enforcement Team (SAFE-Team) proj ect. This second year funding provides for the assignment of an additional domestic violence investigator and a full-time victim advocate to handle cases of domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. The Police Department works in a collaborative effort with Community Services Program, Inc. to provide additional personnel to work with victims of domestic violence and violence against women in general. The grant will continue to provide the Victim Information and Notification Everyday (VINE) system, which is located in the Police Department Jail facility. The VINE system allows the victims of domestic violence to call the jail and receive information on inmate release or status. 20A-1 SAFE-Team Grant Page 2 The funding provides for training of law enforcement personnel in domestic violence. A portion of the grant funds will be used to maintain police apprehension and suppression teams for domestic violence offenders on an overtime basis. The grant requires a match of twenty-five percent of the total project amount. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the appropriation adjustment will increase the FY 2005 SAFE- Team Grant revenue account (account no. 155-01-5367-2) by $95,701, transfer $31,900 from the Police Department Crimes Against Persons Other Contractual Services Account (account no. 011-341-6291), and appropriate same into the FY 2005 SAFE-Team Grant expenditure accounts (account no. 155-355-various). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~-__f~~ l\- ~ \jr'" Paul M. Walters Chief of Police Police Department ~ (\L'\~S"1 !>~ &.) ~--\L. , FranClSCO Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services " 0~ Agency 20A-2 03/15/05Iss RESOLUTION NO. 2005-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO EXECUTE A GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT WITH THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The California Office of Emergency Services has awarded to the Santa Ana Police Department, grant funds in the amount of $95,701, to operate Santa Ana's Focused Enforcement Team project. B. This funding provides for the assignment of an additional domestic violence investigator and a full-time victim advocate to handle cases of domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. C. The grant also will continue to provide a Victim Information and Notification Everyday (VINE) system to allow victims of domestic violence to call and receive information on inmate release or status, provide training of law enforcement personnel in domestic violence, and maintain police apprehension and suppression teams for domestic violence offenders. D. The grant requires matching funds of twenty-five percent. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby authorizes and directs The Chief of Police or his designee to execute the grant award agreement with the Office of Emergency Services. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of ,2005. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor 20A-3 AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Council members NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Laura Sheedy Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2005-029 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20A-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL A.CTION ~ ~~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 21, 2005 CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: TITLE: CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR POLICE UNIFORMS (SPEC. NO. 00-151) APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 1 st Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For ~ (. 1/2 ' / /-{ , , :7"/'ii.- to... /,j . V <. '" CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO --..---- FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Renew the contract with uniforms for a one-year $178,963.01. Galls/Long period in Beach Uniform Company an annual amount not for to police exceed DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Police Department requires uniforms to personnel and replacement uniforms for approximately 650 Uniforms identify department personnel by assigned duties professional appearance. outfit new employees. and give a On March 19, 2001, the City Council awarded a contract to Uniform Center for a three-year period, with provision for two one-year renewals. Galls/Long Beach Uniform Company has agreed to renew the uniform contract. The vendor has requested a five percent increase due to increases from the clothing manufacturers. The vendor has performed satisfactorily during the past contract period, and staff recommends the final renewal of the contract. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Materials and Supplies account Police Property & Facilities (account no. 11-343-6391). Operating (]~A Paul M. ~lters Chief of Police cJD-PMW/KM/OO-151-R.7:SP APPROV~D AS TR:UND~ AND ACCOUNTS: ~~i~r~~ ~~.L Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 22A-1 CS 3Kl 22A-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR TRAFFIC FLARES (SPEC. NO. 04-043) CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 1 st Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For /' CONTINUED TO t7' {. /.; ... .//.. ./7. . / . i / l >~;?Zi. -&.V~ :';C_<. CITY MANAGER .---,----. FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Renew the contract with Adamson Police Products based upon the Cooperati ve Purchase Provision of Orange County, for the purchase of traffic flares for a 12-month period in an annual amount not to exceed $15,451. DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Police Department issues traffic flares to officers for use in the performance of their duties. Traffic flares have a variety of uses by the officers, including routing of traffic during special events, and cordoning off traffic during crime and accident investigations. The City Council adopted Ordinance No.NS-2312 authorizing the City to purchase against contracts with other government agencies utilizing a competi ti ve bid process. The County of Orange recently renewed the contract with Adamson Police Products, formerly Adamson Industries, for traffic flares. The initial contract was awarded as a result of open, competitive bidding, and meets the City requirements. Staff recommends authorizing the renewal to the contract. 228-1 CS 383 Contract Renewal for Traffic Flares (Spec. No. 04-043) March 21, 2005 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Police Property and Facilities Materials and Supplies account (account no. 11-343-6391). The of the contract is estimated, as the actual expenditures will upon the requirements throughout the annual period. Other amount depend APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: (YuJ\\l Paul M. Walters Chief of Police ~~"u21~. .~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency ~PMW/TO/04-043-R.7:SP 228-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: APPROVED CONTRACT AWARD FOR RITCHEY AND LYON STREETS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT NO.05- 3194) D As Recommended D As Amended D Ordinance on 1 sl Reading D Ordinance on 2nd Reading D Implementing Resolution D Set Public Hearing For 7 I " /. // I //;2/ i /,// // !,',;I ',/ ..;' ;/ ~.c<..--A) :, l,CC',v- CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO ~ / . / 'tfJ FILE NUMBER V RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Award a contract to A. R. bidder, in accordance with $155,700 for construction improvements. Sarmiento, Inc., the lowest responsible unit bid prices in the estimated amount of of Ritchey and Lyon Streets water main 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $199,200. DISCUSSION This project involves the construction of new water mains and appurtenances on Ritchey and Lyon Streets (Exhibit 1). The work includes the construction of new water mains, fire hydrants, main gate valves, and water services. Once completed, this project will eliminate water main breaks and leaks associated with the older, deteriorated water mains. In addition, it will enhance water service capacity and fire protection to the surrounding neighborhood. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on January 26 and 28, 2005 and bids were opened on February 24, 2005. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follows. Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: 2 Contractors requesting bidding documents: 17 Bids received: 7 Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 0 23A-1 Project 05-3194 Ritchey and Lyon Streets Water Main Improvements March 21, 2005 Page 2 NAME OF BIDDER 1. A.R. Sarmiento, Inc. 2. J. De Siglo Construction, Inc. 3. Engineered Plumbing, Inc. 4. Robert G. Castongia, Inc. 5. Dominguez General Engineering Contractor 6. Henkels and McCoy, Inc. 7. Savala Construction Co. CITY BID AMOUNT $155,700.00 $159,800.00 $161,750.00 $179,262.00 $181,250.00 $195,773.00 $248,809.24 La Mirada Arcadia Baldwin Park Downey Rosemead Fontana Irvine A total of 7 bids were received and all were responsive. The lowest bid was submitted by A.R. Sarmiento, Inc., for $155,700, which is below the Engineer's estimate of $170,000. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Environmental Review No. 2005-11 has been completed and a Negative Decleration has been filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The funding analysis shows a total estimated construction cost of $199,200 for the project (Exhibit 2). Funds are available in the Water Capital Construction Fund (account no. 66-579-6635). ~""--"?- tZ/~7 -r:4 James G~Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: "~~'\.~t'l-~ ~~::A~ Francisco Gutierrez ~ Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency K:\Construction\RFCA-draft\05-3194 2005-03-21 40 Wd 23A-2 -----=~t:JI:IOL_ ..~~"------_ _ I ~ SANTA --/ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~.. I FOURTH J[j~DDO~i ILJI FIRST ,J J ~ \TlD[~:C~STNUT ICU~ ~~LJD[: ~Dn J~~D[~:]quQ[:J I~ ~ .~,"~D i [~~= ~~ l-~i ;~G~TURT ~~ ~ Z SCHOOl~ CI: EDINGER 0) ;': ~ \[~j[]D[=~jlJD ~L z J GL[H'~ I IDe: ST. GERTRUD< I ~ ( IlwARNER ~[~ ID i ~ ~ Jnlln~ ll/1l~~Jl""jl- ]l'O IIY;"/l[-=[I~ L _ ~ C!J 12 ::::.----- C()lUU6INE~ EDINGER AVE ti ti ti S T. ANDRE W PL w m ~ > ~ <[ w ~ a > ""l 0: <[ <[ 0 0 z z <[ <[ >- 0:: III <:> WARNER PROJECT LOCATION NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT 1 SANTA ANA , t City Council , P W A, Agenda Date MARCH 21 2005 PLellC WORKS AGENCY ' PROJECT NO. 05-3194 RITCHEY AND LYON STREETS ~_!IN IMPROVEMENTS Title: ~ NTS FUNDING ANALYSIS PROJECT 05-3194 RITCHY AND LYON STREETS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Construction Contract Contract Administration Inspection and Testing Survey Staking Contingencies TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Exhibit 2 23A-4 $155,700 6,430 14,000 7,500 15,570 $199,200 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: APPROVED CONTRACT AWARD FOR CENTENNIAL REGIONAL PARK, DAN YOUNG SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD NO.2 (PROJECT 04-6401) o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 1 sl Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For , f {2/J . La/a CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO / ,/{,1 , , FILE NUMBER i i ' !/" RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Relieve Los Angeles Engineering of their bid in the amount of $725,521. 25. 2. Award a contract to Ohno Construction Company, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices in the estimated amount of $814,731 for construction of Centennial Regional Park, Dan Young Synthetic Turf Field No.2. 3. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $1,018,400. DISCUSSION This project involves the removal of the existing natural turf and installation of new synthetic turf for a dual soccer and football field at the Dan Young Soccer Complex within the Centennial Regional Park (Exhibit 1). Construction includes installation of synthetic turf and a drainage system underneath the field. Once completed, the project will enhance the Dan Young Soccer Complex at the Centennial Park and reduce maintenance costs for the turf. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on January 3 and 5, 2005 and bids were opened on February 9, 2005. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follows. Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: 8 Contractors requesting bidding documents: 12 Bids received: 4 Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 0 238-1 Project 04-6401 Centennial Regional Park, Dan Young Synthetic Turf Field No.2 March 3, 2005 Page 2 NAME OF BIDDER CITY BID AMOUNT $814,731 $846,702 $887,299 1. Ohno Construction Company 2. Environmental Constuction, Inc. 3. Byrom-Davey, Inc. Seattle, WA Agoura Hills, CA San Diego, CA A total of 4 bids were received and all but one were responsive. Two days after the bid opening, Los Angeles Engineering requested to be relieved of the bid, stating they had made a clerical error in filling out the bid. After examining Los Angeles Engineering's bidding documents, staff has found sufficient grounds for the relief, and therefore recommends that Los Angeles Engineering's request be granted. The lowest responsive bid was submitted by Ohno Construction, for $814,731, which is below the Engineer's estimate of $840,000. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ER 03-47 was previously prepared and approved for this project and no further analysis is required. FISCAL IMPACT The funding analysis shows a total estimated construction $1,018,400 for the project (Exhibit 2). Funds are available California State Park Bond Grant (Acct. No. 169-270-6631). cost in of the APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~~ /~ ::---~ James G. foss Executive Director Public Works Agency ~~ Jr /l1~Y Gerardo Mouet ( Executive Director Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency /Jp t:{f~'~'~:y Fv ~< ':\~~~~A)~~ I Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 1/ I K:\Construction\RFCA-draft\04-6401 2005-03-21 70 WD 238-2 ~ ~ It ~ U1 i ! :I ELDER A V .... ]~ <> w -' oct U V'> o I- ~~ " UL fC= L BORCHARD A V HOOO A V CENTENNIAL PARK I PROJECT SITE FIELD NO.2 EXHIBIT 1 SANTA ANA 'PWA t , , PlJLIt _5 IWItY CITY COUNCL ACEK)A DATE March 21. 2005 Title: CENTENNIAL REGIONAL PARK, DAN YOUNG SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD NO.2 PROJECT NO. 04-6401 FUNDING ANALYSIS PROJECT 04-6401 CENTENNIAL REGIONAL PARK DAN YOUNG SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD NO.2 Construction Contract Contract Administration Inspection and Testing Survey Staking Contingencies $814,731 25,196 60,000 37,000 81,473 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $1, 018,400 Exhibit 2 238-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 21, "2005 TITLE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED CONTRACT AWARD FOR RENOVATION OF PLAYGROUNDS AT BOMO KORAL AND LILLIE KING PARKS (PROJECT 04-6406) D As Recommended D As Amended D Ordinance on 1 sl Reading D Ordinance on 2nd Reading D Implementing Resolution D Set Public Hearing For I .A CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER i \ RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Award a contract to Fleming Environmental, Inc. , the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices for the base bid plus add-on alternate one in the estimated amount of $366,214.50 for the Renovation of Playgrounds at Bomo Koral and Lillie King Parks. 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $458,500. DISCUSSION Bomo Koral and Lillie King Parks are open spaces in a suburban environment and the playground facilities in these parks are in need of renovation and upgrades (Exhibit 1). The project includes installation of new playground equipment and drainage improvements to both parks. This project will allow for enhanced recreational opportunities for children in adjacent neighborhoods and all children in the City. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on January 19, 2005 and January 21, 2005, and bids were opened on February 25, 2005. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and bid results follow. Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: 5 Contractors requesting bidding documents: 8 Bid received: 3 Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 0 23C-1 Project 04-6406 Renovation of Playgrounds at Bomo Koral And Lillie King Parks March 21, 2005 Page 2 NAME OF BIDDER CITY BASE BID AMOUNT 2. Arya Construction, Inc. 3. Vida Samarzich, Inc. Irvine $328,264.50 $349,741.00 $358,600.00 1. Fleming Environmental, Inc. Buena Park Alta Lorna A total of three bids were received and all were responsive. The lowest base bid was submitted by Fleming Environmental, Inc. for $328,264.50 which is above the Engineer's estimate of $239,285.00. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Environmental Review Nos. 2003-339 and 2003-331 have been completed and a Negative Declaration has been filed for this project, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. FISCAL IMPACT The Funding Analysis shows a total estimated construction cost of $458,500 for the project (Exhibit 2). Funds are available in the State per Capita Fund (account no. 169-270-6631), Robert Z'Berg Harris Grant Fund(account no. 161-270-6631) and the Park Acquisition and Development Fund (account no. 301-232-6631). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: /iA~i " . \1 \ ~-\-~\~t'.A\ }~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency fJrP Gerardo Mouet Executive Director Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency K:\Construction\RFCA-draft\RFCA 04-6406 03-21-2005.doc 23C-2 SANT A ANA 'PWA' , , PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY PROJECT AREA ~ o ...J U. EXHIBIT 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: PROJECT 04-6046 - RENOVATION OF PLAYGROUNDS AT BOMO KORAL AND LILLIE KING PARKS ~ N.T.S FUNDING ANALYSIS RENOVATION OF PLAYGROUNDS AT BOMO KORAL AND LILLIE KING PARKS PROJECT 04-6406 Construction Contract Contract Administration Inspection and Testing Survey Staking Contingencies $366,214.50 $15,480.00 $21,634.50 $18,550.00 $36,621.00 $458,500.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Exhibit 2 23C-4 ~ z ~ ~ E- Z ~ rr., ... o >- E- U lI'l :;;: o ~ i/) 0 ~ 0 N M ...... E-::; ~- QE- QQ .... - I:t:ll:t:l '" '" .. o:l ~ OJ) = ~ a ~ "0 = o:l '; .. o ~ o e o I:t:l '" = .~ - o:l ~ o = Q,l ~ "0 = ::I o .. OJ) >. o:l c:: '.cl 0::> ...,. '.cl I ...,. 0::> .;.; u Q,l ....., o .. ~ u .9 ..c u 'N ~ E '" CIl o "0 ;; u .9 "," ,:;: u ~ '" o U '" 1:- ..: u .9 OJ <: " E '" 2 ';; '" '-'l OJ) '" '6 " r;: CIl ~'-'l '-'It- '-'l": ~:;;: 0- z[;:j '-'l'-'l 0:: '-'l Q 9 co '" E j i3 =< " '" ~ ~ '" ~ '" '" " ;> co CIl CIl '-'l 0:: Q Q ..: " "0 ~ OJ) ,5 0- "CIl .... "'" ~ "5iJ.5 o Jj ~ ~ ;-~ ,,'-'l M ~ ~ ~.~ N~~~ ~~ ~~~N oq-r- .5 .5 .5 &: ~ ~ uuu'<::t "=:tN o.-g~~~~ ~:+t: gBlJ5J5J5~ 'g] (/j ~ c: c c ". r.n V'J 03 Q. .~ ~ ~ .s 0 J:; .s ~ ~ ~";;:j"r;; "'C !3 "'C "'C l5z~~~@u~@ ~g~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"E ~"E 'E ..s..s..s..s..s&:o:~~ ...l ..: t- o t- 00000000 00000",,00 66666r-66 oooaOO-f-O OOOOO.q-N-~O v)N\O"ooooN-.:i'OO'" QA......!:Ar"1V}-EAM EA EA EA V7 '-'l U C2 ~ t- ~ 00000000 000001.(")00 666000000:.6 O.q-ON...... 0 OEAr-........EAVtEAO ~... _"'fA- 00 "" "" M "" on " >- ...l ..: t- o t- 00 00 00 00 00 (',1"("'>.1" '<t M "" "" 000 000 ",-)66 o-r-o 00 0 0 V)" ('1"' 00 """" N "" 000 000 666 000 o '<ton ('1...-..6......... "" ""- "" '-'l U C2 >l-. t: ~5 >- 000 000 666 000 o on N"bAEA '<t "" 00000 00000 6v-i 0\ 0\ 0 NNVtVtO """" 0 00 N "" ...l ..: t- o t- 00000 00000 600006 ("fj 00 .q- "T 00 00... 0... "T 00 0\ l(") "T N r-: lr)" EA- NEA "" "" "" 000 OO~ v-iOI./") 0- 0 ono-M 00" N 1"")" "" "" M "" '-'l U i:2 >l-. t- ~~ >- 000 ~OO O~N M '<t 00 "" - v) M "" "" 00000 00000 r--:MMM.n 00 _ 0 EAEAf:AEAM., M M "" ...l ..: t- o t- 00000000 ooooo~oo 666601.(")06 OOOOONl(")O ON o \00\ oo-.::t 0 v) 0-,... ~ r-: v5 0-," M ......" EA-EA-V1-EAEAN "" "" "" '-'l U i:2 >l-. t- ~ 00000000 00000000 6odv-iv-i.nv-ici 0\001.1")- 0 ~bASGAbAEAEA::... "" "" N "" ~ t- o o OQlrlQ -N'o::tN'>.Olrl("f')- r<") M"'T \0 N t: z ::> ~C25CBiBiBi25 CIl ~ '-'l t: 9 co gjl,~ :E~ ~.D~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 0 " ";"0"'0 ... '" " Q ~ t;:: ~ ~"~ e"~ ~ Q ~ = =:IU::> Q Z o co Q 00 -Mt""')o::t't.n'-O 00 00 66 00 00 1:'""--" ("f')"' - "" "" r- 2ic-Fi 00 00 66 00 00 r--: t""')"' - "" "" 00 00 00 00 o on M"'M"' "" "" 00 00 00 00 o on NN - "" "" 00 00 0;\Ci r-N NO '<t" N - "" "" 00 00 0'....0 r-N NO o::t''' (',,f - "" "" 00 00 00 00 0- 0 00"": "" "" 00 00 00 00 0- 0 00""': "" "" ..:..: '-'l'-'l o o o o o r-: "" 00000000 OOOOC:;OV)O 0000('1000 OOOO("f')\O..q-O OOOOON\OMO v)" OO"'\Q" -q:- ~ ('I"' "v-l' W......WV) NWOOW W W V'} V'} o o 6 o o r-: "" 0000 0000 6660 o -q- 0 N 0"" r- v)"' .....: EFt "" "" 0000 OOtnc:; 000\00 '<t 0 EFt EFt ('I 0 on' 00 "" "" o o o o o r-: "" 00000000 00000000 0000...0666 0000-\000 OOOO\OMOO ~V)"OCO-q-"' "o-.i' -q--q- EFt V) V'} EFt (A (A (A (A fA- o o 6 o o r-" "" 00000000 00000000 66660\0\66 ooo-q-(A(AOO o t.n(A 00 0:: (A ('I" 0'" -q:- -q- fA- V) (A "" "" o o 0; N -0 "" 00000000 oV)oc:;oooo 6r-..:NVi00666 Vi 00 I:'""-- -q-NOO 1:'""--0 \D 0 V) 00 00 00"' \lS -q-"' a: ("f')"' ... N" v5 fA-- t""')('IfA-00fA- (A fA- fA- EFt fA- o o 0; N 'D" "" o on 0 or- 0 ci""';oO onM'D I:'""-- fA- \0", 00" M "" "" 00000 I:'""--V)ooo ...oq:M66 00 00 W(AEFtOO N \0" 00 "" "" o o 6 o on "" "" 00000000 00000000 66660666 oooV)\Oooo OOOf'""-t""') V)O'. v-l'r---:'-.:t'''-q''-q:-('I''00 ... V'} ('I EFt ('I ('IfA--q-fA- EFt fA- f,;'} f,;'} o o o o on M" "" 000 000 666 o 'D 0 ~V'}s "" "" 00000 00000 v-iv-iv-i66 on 00 (A V) (A Vi 0.. 00 ......"' '<t "" "" o o"'=To ......~-.:t'~~..q- ..: '-'l CIl>-":>-"'''''':'': ..: ...lU'-'lUCIlCll'-'l'-'l '-'l b1l '" .~ CIl '" 'OJ -= U ;> OJ o ;:;:: e ('I '-' .a, E u OJ) " ~ ~ g"5 "2 ~ ~ ~~ ~ 6.6E: ~ 6 ooootco VJ "~ "~ ~ ~ ~ Cl.]~~~-< ~ ~~~~~~j8 0;;:;::~~?l8~::: ~ ~"oo "Vi :;:; g ~ ~ c'5z~~~~ :::.9 0; co -= u -< o on o o S '!to ] .s "0 ~ ~ 'E ;> '" OJ) 6 '" .- :E~ ':':~2 ~ .. 0 ~ ~"O"O '" " C ro ~ ~ gjl'~ ~"~ ~ =-'" ...<U::> ......('It""')-q-Vi\OI:'""--OO o o o o 0-, M "" o o 6 o M "" o o o o on -0 "" o o o o on "" o o 6 'D 00 N" "" o o o N N "" o o 6 o c<'). "" o o o o "" ::; 0- o o o o 'D 00 on M "" o ~ '<t r- 0-" '<t M "" o on .,f 'D N 00 N M "" o ~ on 00 N d: M N "" -E '" >l-. OJ) '" Q ~ ;J "0 '" oj ~ o ~ o E o co .:.: ... .. ~ ~ ~ :S~ ~~ ~~ 63 .~ ~ -:;; e 1::: ... .a ~ u =< 2 ev; T g, :g~ ..:05 "0 co " on '" co OJ '0 t- o o o o on "" N "" o o o o N 00 M "" o o 6 o on "" N "" o o 0; on N 00 "" o o o o o 00 on M "" o o 0; on N 00 <A o ~ o on 0- r-: M "" o on .,f N -0 'D M "" o o 6 on 0- r-" M <A o C) on - r- o 'D "" o o 6 o o o o M "" ~ '0 <ll Cl ro 0.. o o 6 o o o 'D "" CIl ...l '" z o '" t- ..: z " '" t- ...l < rJJ ~ ...l ~ Q ;; '" CIl ..: =:I 23C-6 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: APPROVED CONTRACT AWARD FOR BIRCH STREET WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT 05-3196) o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 1 sl Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO / / / I. f>LZ? L -c FILE NUMBER ( RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Award a contract to J. De Sigio Construction, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices for an estimated amount of $359,940. 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $449,900. DISCUSSION This project involves the construction of a new water main and appurtenances along Birch Street from First to Cubbon Streets (Exhibit 1). Work includes the construction of new water mains, valves, fire hydrants, and water services. Once completed, this project will eliminate water main breaks and leaks associated with older and deteriorated water mains. In addition, it will enhance water service capacity and provide fire protection to the surrounding neighborhoods. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on January 26 and 28, 2005, and bids were opened on February 24, 2005. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follows. Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: 2 Contractors requesting bidding documents: 19 Bids received: 7 Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 0 4r, 230-1 Project 05-3196 Birch Street Water Main Improvements March 21, 2005 Page 2 Name of Bidder City Bid Amount 1. J. De Sigio Construction, Inc. 2. Engineered Plumbing 3. Robert G. Castonogia, Inc. 4. Dominguez General Engineering Construction 5. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. 6. palp, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company Downey Baldwin Park Downey $ 359,940.00 $ 374,250.00 $ 383,957.00 Rosemead Fontana $ 825,722.20 $ 493,298.00 Long Beach $ 523,600.00 A total of six bids were received, and all were responsive. J. De Sigio Construction, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive bid for $359,940, which is below the Engineer's estimate of $371,700. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Environmental Review No. 2005-10 has been completed and a Negative Declaration has been filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The Funding Analysis shows a total estimated construction cost of $449,900 for the project (Exhibit 2). Funds are available in the Water Utility Capital Projects Fund (account no. 66-579-6635). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~/ ~f2i?. /,-41- Ie Aft "-'Y James G. litOss ,:;7 Executive Director Public Works Agency ~~~\.~A) \~~ .~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency rJ K:jconstrucitomjRFCA\01-03-05 RFCA 05-3196 45 WD 230-2 17TH ST. 17m ST. ~ (SCAlE: N,l.S_) FIRST ST. FIRST ST. ~ ~ E-< I ~ E-< CI,) rJ'.:l 00 fZl a ~ s ~ ~ e:: Eo-< ~ 00 Ii! 0 ....:l ~ ~ ~ CUBBONST ~ C FADDEN AVE MCFADDENAVE 0 EDINGER AVE. PROJECT LOCATION SANT A ANA .. ,City Council · P W A Agenda Date , 'MARCH 21, 2005 PlllUC WORKS AGENCY Title: EDINGER AVE. EXHIBIT 1 PROJECTi 05-3196 BIRCH STREET WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS 230-3 FUNDING ANALYSIS PROJECT 05-3196 BIRCH STREET WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Construction Contract Contract Administration Inspection and Testing Survey Contingencies TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Exhibit 2 230-4 $359,940 15,766 20,700 17,500 35,994 $449,900 on o o N ..,f N C- ell = '" .Q Q,l ... f;Iol E- < Cl Cl - ~ -< Z -< ~ ~ Z -< r:JJ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ rI} U ..... = ~ e ~ ~ 0 l. Q., e ..... = .- eo: ~ l. ~ ..... eo: ~ ..... ~ ~ l. ..... 00. .c: CJ l. .- ~ .. 1,0 0'1 ..... ~ I l/'l = 0 Z ..... CJ ~ ........ 0 l. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ci ci ci 00 ci N .,f V) ci 00 r-- .....:l r-- 0 - V) 0 V) r-- '0 N 0 V) - 0 M M 00, '" .",. Vl M 0, "', <: V) N' 0' N' M N' N' M '0' V) M oj E- M ~ '" ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ - 00 0 N ~ ~ ~ M ..s E- ~ ~ of o5iJ c B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rJl (iI oj 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 U u r-: ci - loCi ci loCi r-: V) ci .,f cj C2 '0 V) N 00 0 r-- M '0 '0 .",. ;>.. 0... ~ ~ 00 r-- .",., .",., ~ Vl - - ~ ~ N' t:: 0 E- M - - M M C ~ ~ ~ &'7 &'7 &'7 0 ~ Z ..0 rJl 0 0 0 ;:l ~ 0 >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci .....:l V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V) <: 0, N 0 0, Vl 0 0 0, 0 V) N oj E- M N' 0' M - 00 r--' M '0' 0' .",.' ..s 0 '" &'7 - &'7 M ~ &'7 &'7 &'7 - r-- - - &'7 &'7 M bO E- &'7 ~ &'7 C :D S :l (iI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15: ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "0 @ U V) V) ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 0... C2 V) V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... c 0... ~ &'7 0, 0, V) 0 Vl 0, 0, Vl 0 .",.' .",.' 0 o~ E- - - M M M - C &'7 &'7 &'7 &'7 &'7 ~ &'7 &'7 '5iJ "0 rJl ~ C 0; 0 (iI CO >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oj ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ..s .....:l 00 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .",. <: '0 r-- V) r-- 00, N 0 O. 00, V) '" c' E- 00' N 0' N' M '0' v:i M V) 0' 0\ .g 0 M &'7 '0 &'7 N &'7 &'7 &'7 &'7 - V) E- N &'7 &'7 &'7 M <.> &'7 &'7 :l J:l rJl C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iI 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 00 0; ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 C2 '5iJ '0 '0 V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0... &'7 &'7 V) '" .",., - 0, O. '" Vl Ui oj &'7 &'7 N' :.0 E- M M M M - 0 oj ~ &'7 ~ &'7 &'7 &'7 &'7 0 <.> rJl .... 0 .....; <: >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .....:l ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci <: V) 0 0 V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E- - 0, 0 N V) O. 0 Vl '0 r-- r--, Ul 0 00 M 00' N' .",.' 00 '0' - N' r-: - ~ (iI N &'7 00 ~ N ~ &'7 &'7 &'7 &'7 r-- E- E- N &'7 &'7 M (iI <: &'7 &'7 ~ 25 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CJ ~ (iI 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ul U V) V) ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci Z (iI C2 '0 r-- 0 V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iI 0... ~ &'7 00 r-- Vl 0 0 Vl M, - &'7 &'7 M .",.' M - - - E- &'7 ~ &'7 &'7 &'7 &'7 ~ ~ 0 0 - 0 E- Vl .",. - M r-- N N - N r-- 0' M - E- <: < < ~ p;. p;. <: <: <: < <: .....:l .....:l (iI (iI (iI ~ (iI (iI (iI (iI C C '~ '~ ~ ~ .... .... 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ > > ~ ~ rJl 0; 0; 0 "0 ;> ;> U U :l "0 "0 ;> ;> '0 c c Ul 0... 0... .E oj oj rJl rJl 0 ~ <5 0' 0 0 0 (l) <.> ;>.. > > <.> <.> ';; (iI 0 0 ::0 0 0 C ~ .... t: '" '" S 0 0 oj C 0 U U <1.i ri) ri) C Ul 0 0 (l) 0 ~ ~ rJl 0.. :E -B t:: t:: .... f;Iol rJl ci: :l 0 05 < ~ :l 0.. ~ U ~ 0.. ..... 0; 0.. 0.. ~ - 0 ~ .... <: <: ~ <.> 0 g- o.. <: <: 0;; .... ~ oj o(! o(! ;:l 0... 0' 0 ~.....:l E- E- U Cl 0' .... > Ul 0 0 0 0 0; ::r: 0 '0 '0 (l) (l) N - Ul Z N N Ul ;> > ::r: ::r: c c ~ ~ .... 0 ;J ;J ~ 0 rJl rJl 0 .... 0; .... .....:l (iI rJl rJl ~ 0 ~ ;> ::0 0 0 < 0 CO oj oj ~ 00 (l) .... .... I~ 0 0 0 0 ~ CJ ~ 0 :x: :x: ~ ~ t! E- O 05 . 0 ~ - 0 <: 00 '0 - 00 Z CJ 00 ::0 ::0 ~ - E- - N M .",. , ~r f'_ J: r-- 00 '" 0 - (V') '0 OJ OJ ro 0.. It'l c:> c:> N ...; N C' ~ = .. ,Q "" ... ~ E- -< Q Q .... l:Q ~ - = ~ 8 ~ ~ o l. c.. 8 ..... = ... = ~ l. ~ - = ~ - ~ ~ l. - 00 -= ~ l. = .. I.C 0\ ..... ~ I l/'l o o z - ~ ~ ..... o l. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c: 0 0 0 c: 0 0 0 0 c: c: or> 0 0 \Ci <"l ."r .-.-.i r--: \Ci or> 00 .....l 00 00 or> <"l r- r- <"l <"l '<t 00 0\ .- \0" N .- '<to "'l or> 0" '<to .- "'., -< 00" <"l \0" or> or> 00 r--:' <"l or> 0" <"l E- N EA 0\ EA N EA EA EA EA .- 0\ U 0 <"l EA EA EA '<t E- EA EA .s >; 0 U u ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :::E u or> 0 c: 0 0 c: c: c: c: c: o(! OZ <"l .-.-.i or> .-.-.i 0\ r- \0 r- <"l or> 0\ 0\ r- .- <"l 00 \0 <"l N or> <JJ o;S 0.. EA EA 00 r-" \0" .- r-" 0" r- '<to Q3 c E- EA .- <"l '<to <"l <"l N" .- ..>:: o;S ~ EA EA EA EA EA EA EA C E <JJ Q) 0 Q) ::c: ... >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ .....l N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N -< r- 0 0 0 Ir), 0 0 0" 0 0 N" 0 E- N" \0" 0" \tS .- 0 0 or> 00" '<to <"l U or> EA .- EA <"l .- .- EA EA .- or> 0 N .- EA EA EA EA '<t 00 E- EA EA EA C ~ c" Q) ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r- or> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N U EA .- 0" 0 or> 0" 0" 0" 0 0 Q) "1:l OZ EA .- N" '<to or> or> or> .,f' N" ::l o;S 0.. EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA l>Il Q) c E E- 's Q) ~ <JJ <JJ 0 0 Q) 0 ~ >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .....l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0\ -< <"l "'., Ir), 0" 0" 0" 0 or> 0 0 Ir), E- N" <"l .- <"l .- or> '<to N" '<to r-" <"l 0 .- EA r- EA N EA EA EA EA EA <"l E- <"l EA EA '<t EA EA U .s ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi U 0\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OZ .... 00 00 or> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o::l o;S 0.. EA EA \0 0" 0" or> 0 or> 0 0" C EA N" N" N" N" o;S Q) E- .- <"l .- ,~ "1:l EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 'OJ' ~ <JJ ~ Q) :::E :< >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .....l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -< or> 0 0 or> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E- .- 0" 0 N or> 0 0 Ir), \0 r- r-" CZl 0 00 <"l 00" N" '<to 00" \0" .- N" r-" .- CG ~ N EA 00 EA N EA EA EA EA EA r- E- E- N EA EA <"l ~ -< EA EA ~ z :::E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G E=: ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CZl U or> or> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z ~ OZ \0 r- 0 or> 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0.. EA EA 00 r- Ir), 0 0 Ir), "'l .- EA EA '<to M E- <"l .- .- .- ~ EA EA EA EA EA EA ~ 0 0 .- 0 E- Ir), '<t .- <"l r- N N .- N r- CI .- <"l E- -< -< -< -< -< -< -< -< ~ ... ... .....l .....l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c '@ '@ :::E :::E .... .... Q) Q) Q) Q) &J &J ;> ;> ~ ~ <JJ ~ ~ Q) "1:l > > U U ::l "1:l "1:l > > U @ c CZl 0.. 0.. ..s o;S <JJ <JJ Q) Q) :::E 0" 0" ;>, Q) Q) Q) U u ::0 ;> ;> U C ';;: ~ 0 0 Q) Q) c o;S .... t: 0\ 0\ E Q) Q) o;S c Q) U U ~ U:i U:i c Q) CZl Q) Q) 0 ~ -< <JJ 0.. :€ oS 1: 1: .... ~ <JJ i:l: ::l Q) 55 ~ -< ::l 0.. &J u ~ ~ 0.. .... ~ 0.. 0.. ~ ;: Q) @ .... -< -< -< -< U Q) g- o.. ::J 0.. .... &J o;S o(! ';;: Q) ~.....l E- E- o(! U Q 0" 0" .... ;> 0 Q) ~ ::c: 0 0 Q) Q) .... CZl 0 0 CZl Q) C c N l:Q ~ CZl Z N N .... > Q) ;> ::c: ::c: ;.J ;.J ~ 0 <JJ <JJ Q) .... ~ .... .....< ~ <JJ <JJ &J Q) i:i: > 00 \0 0 -< o::l o;S o;S &J Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 ~ .... .... E- O 0 0 ~ Q) :>< :>< i:i: i:i: !::::l 55 0 55 . Q) &J .- 0 -< 00 \0 .- 00 Z 0 00 \0 \0 ~ .- E- .- N <"l '<t MI ,-,: 00 0\ 0 or> .- (") '0 N Ql OJ ro Cl. II'l Q Q N ..; N C: ~ = .. .Cl .. r.o. [;;J Eo- -< Q Q - lXl rI':l ... = ~ 8 ~ ~ = - Q., 8 ..... = ..... I:':l ~ - ~ ... I:':l ~ ... ~ ~ - ... 00 -= CJ - iE 'C 0'\ ..... ~ I l/) Q o Z ... CJ ~ '-' = - ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OIl .....l \D 0 0 0'1 0 0 0'1 0 0 \D 0 I:: -< 00" '<t N N 0'1 N \D ...... V) '<t \D" o~ f-< ...... N" '<t" '<t" 0'1" 1'-" \D" V) 0'1" N" <'l 0 0 ~ <'l ~ <'l ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... N ~ f-< <'l ...... ~ ~ V) a3 ~ ~ ~ u ><: "'-l \D 0 0 0 0 0 V) 0 0 0 ell "'-l 00 \D N <'l 0 0 '<t 0 V) 00 ..0 ,..c U ~ ~ "t '<t" 1'-" \D" "':. ...... I'- 1'-" "0 u C:2 '<to U ell ...... ...... V) <'l <'l V) ...... Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .E co f-< ci. OIl Z l:: rJl "'@ 0 Q) ;:J ~ .....l >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .....l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ V) 0 0 V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f-< ...... 0" 0 N V) 0 0 'r:. \D I'- 1'-" Ul 0 00 <'l 00 N" '<to 00" \D" ...... N" 1'-" ...... ~ "'-l N ~ 00 ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I'- f-< f-< N ~ ~ <'l "'-l ~ ~ ~ "'-l Z V) V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E=: "'-l \D I'- 0 V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ul U ~ ~ 00 I'- 'r:. 0 0" 'r:. "':. ...... Z "'-l C:2 ~ ~ <'l ..f' <'l ...... ...... ...... "'-l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f-< ~ ;;.; 0 0 ...... 0 f-< 'r:. '<t ...... <'l I'- N N ...... N I'- 0' <'l ...... f-< ~ ~ ~ "" "" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .....l .....l "'-l "'-l "'-l "'-l "'-l "'-l "'-l "'-l I:: I:: o~ o~ ~ ~ .... .... Q) Q) Q) Q) 'iii 'iii .. .. ~ ~ rJl "'@ "'@ Q) "0 > > u U ::l "0 "0 > > U l:: I:: CIl ~ ~ .E ell ell rJl rJl Q) Q) ~ 0" 0" >. Q) Q) Q) u u .. .. u 0;; "'-l 0 0 ~ Q) Q) I:: a .... t: 0'1 0'1 Q) Q) ell I:: Q) U U ..; U3 U3 I:: Ul Q) Q) Q) Cl ~ ~ rJl 0. :€ .s t: t: .... [;;J rJl ~ ::l Q) 05 ~ ~ ~ ;::l 0. 'iii U ~ 0. ~ .... "'@ 0. 0. ~ ;: Q) I:: .... ~ ~ ~ ~ U ell Q) 0. 0. ;:J g" oE .... 'iii ell ell c(j c(j Q) "R.....l f-< f-< U Q 0 0" .. Ul Cl 0 0 Q) "'@ ::I: Q) '0 '0 Q) Q) N - Ul I:: I:: lXl ~ Ul Z N N .... > Q) .. ::I: ::I: ;J ;.:i gj "'@ .... .....l 0 rJl rJl Q) .... 0 "'-l rJl rJl 'iii Q) lI: > '0 Q) Q) -< Cl co ell ell 'iii 00 Cl U U ~ .... .... Eo- Cl Cl 0 :;: Q) :>< :>< lI: lI: t::! 05 Cl 05 > Q) 'iii ...... 0 ~ 00 \D ...... 00 z 0 00 \D '0 "r ...... Eo- ...... N <'l '<t V) AMr \-_i 00 0'1 0 ...... C"') "6 C"') QJ Ol ctl ll. 230-8 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: EASEMENT DEED WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (PROJECT 04- 1003) APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 15t Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For j /3~ LhECOMMENDED ACTION i/d / / / j(~'/~ ,-.I ," J', ,/" ;, /t. ""t rJ :./~('.." CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the City Council to execute an easement deed with Southern California Edison for installation of a storm drain. DISCUSSION The County of Orange plans to widen to Warner Avenue near the Santa Ana River. The authorization of a cooperative agreement between the City and County of Orange for the Warner Avenue Bridge Widening Project is concurrently before the City Council as a separate action. The project requires the installation of a new storm drain on Southern California Edison (SCE) property located at 2430 South Harbor Boulevard. The storm drain will be owned and maintained by the City. These improvements are needed to improve drainage and safety at the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Warner Avenue. In accordance with the proposed cooperative agreement, the City will acquire an easement for installation of the storm drain. SCE has agreed to sell the City this easement for $15,000. Construction is scheduled to begin in August 2005. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is exempt from further review. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was filed for this project by the County of Orange. 23E-1 Easement Deed Southern California Edison March 21, 2005 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funding in the amount of $15,000 is available in the Select Street Construction Fund (account no. 59-551-6631, project no. 04-1003.) APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~ ~ J~~ROSS Executive Director Public Works Agency ~ \:\ \ " Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 23E-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR EDINGER AVENUE MEDIAN AT BOYD STREET APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For /.. /. .: - . /) t / ./) '/ ,/" //.'.. ./' t'L" ."" V {;. u..t'-~~,- CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO --- FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve and adopt the Negative Declaration E.R. No. 2004-215. DISCUSSION The cities of Santa Ana and Tustin have been working cooperatively to widen Edinger Avenue from Ritchey Street to 1400 feet east of Redhill Avenue. The widening is part of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street proj ect and includes a raised median in Edinger Avenue. The Smart Street project environmental impact report (EIR) had originally included an opening in the median at Boyd Street to accommodate westbound left turns and northbound left turns. However, in order to reduce the potential for accidents, staff later determined the need to construct the median without an opening at Boyd Street (Exhibit 1). Since the scope of work in the EIR included a median opening at Boyd Street, it is now necessary to approve and adopt a negative declaration to close the median. The portion of the Edinger Avenue median at Boyd Street is the subject of Negative Declaration ER-2004-215. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Negative Declaration, E.R. No. 2004-215 has been prepared for this project. 23F-1 Negative Declaration of Edinger Avenue Median at Boyd Street March 21, 2005 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the project are available in account no. 992-631-6631, project no. 2585. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: --;;/~ p>t? James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency "" \\N"'~' 'h.r (:) "JL. , Francisco Gutierrez ~ Executive Director ~ Finance and Mgt. Services Agency 23F-2 I I ~ I I I ./ I '- ru :I: /- ~ 1 I I I _______________________~______oo__________oo EDINGER AVENUE 00,___00--". '& ..___---------------,-----1- i \. ~ \ :: : \\'. !! I ',\ i i V///////ff$'hl ~<?f~~~ EXHIBIT 1 Title: SANTA ANA , PW A t , , J\aC _5 AWICY City CouncU Agenda Date MARCH 21, 2005 APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR EDINGER AVENUE MEDIAN AT BOYD STREET 23F-3 ~~ ~ (~ ~ : ~ I I I : ~ I ~ I ~ ''-- ~~ ~ \" q,. '\, 23F-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: AGREEMENT WITH THE ACTIVE NETWORK TO PROVIDE RECREATION FACILITY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE APPROVED D As Recommended D As Amended D Ordinance on 151 Reading D Ordinance on 2nd Reading D Implementing Resolution D Set Public Hearing For i ,/', - ,(/~JIJ ;Z~ CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with The Active Network to provide recreation facility management software in an amount not to exceed $75,755. DISCUSSION The City currently utilizes a manual system to process facility reservations at each of its athletic fields, recreation centers and senior centers. The continuing demand for City athletic fields, facilities and meeting rooms requires an efficient, reliable system for processing and monitoring reservations. An evaluation committee consisting of representatives from the Information Services division and the Parks, Recreation and Community Services agency was assembled to evaluate recreation software solutions available in the marketplace. The committee defined core requirements of the software system and identified and contacted known potential software vendors. The committee researched product information for three leading recreation facility management software companies including Class Software, RecWare Safari, and Vermont Systems RecTrac software. The committee conducted surveys, interviews and on-site visits with cities currently utilizing the various software programs to assess their capability and effectiveness. In addition, the committee requested detailed vendor surveys from each of the software vendors. As a result, Class Software and RecWare were invited to perform on-site demonstrations and submi t cost proposals. Vermont System was not capable of meeting the City's software needs. 25A-1 Agreement with The Active Network to Provide Recreation Facility Management Software March 21, 2005 Page 2 The following weighted rating system was applied in evaluating each software solution: . Functional requirements Results of client city surveys Architecture/Technology Potential growth Service and Support Vendor background Acquisition Cost . . . . . . The rating and price of the two recreation facility management software systems are as follows: Class Software RecWare Safari Score 86.27 68.24 Price $68,868 $68,586 The evaluation results revealed that Class Software outperformed RecWare Safari in six of the seven evaluation categories. The committee concluded that the Class Software solution provides the best source and value for meeting this unique City need. The one-year agreement with the Active Network, the parent company of Class Software, includes a 10 percent contingency. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Technology Plan Miscellaneous City proj ects, computer software account (account no. 109-600-6661). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~,-? Gerardo Mouet Executive Dir ctor Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency ~~~\'\'~ ~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director f~ Finance and Management Svcs. Agency 25A-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: APPROVED JOINT AGREEMENT FOR THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY 800 MHZ COUNTYWIDE COORDINATED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 15t Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO .___--r. FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute the Joint Agreement for the Operation, Maintenance, and Financial Management of the Orange County 800 MHz Countywide Coordinated Communications System. DISCOSSION In early 1996, the City of Santa Ana, as well as 30 other cities, the Orange County Fire Authority, and the County of Orange, executed the 800 MHz Joint Agreement for the Implementation and Operation of the Orange County 800 MHz Countywide Coordinated Communications System. This agreement addressed City/County partnership responsibilities and financial obligations for the implementation of the system. In August 2003, the agreement was amended to include the 800 MHz system backbone cost-sharing proposal, which established each participant's annual operations charge including payback for the FY 2002/2003 backbone costs, which were initially paid by Orange County. During the past several months, the 800 MHz CCCS Governance Committee has updated the agreement. Whereas, the original agreement addressed the radio system's initial implementation, the new agreement takes into account the ongoing partnership responsibilities for its operation, maintenance and financial management including the backbone cost-sharing amendment, which remains the same. Two key points have been introduced to the new agreement. concerns the financing of any future system and infrastructure Participating agencies will share in these upgrades, which will through the use of available grant funds, entry fees The first upgrades. be funded f rom new 258-1 Joint Agreement for 800 MHz Communications System March 21, 2005 Page 2 participating agencies that join the system, combined City/County contract reserve funds, and infrastructure contributions collected annually as part of the backbone cost-sharing allocations. The second key point states that contributions made to system upgrades and infrastructure by participating agencies will be held in a County account specifically designated for this purpose, or in a third-party escrow account. The former method streamlines the administrative process and reduces the costs associated with a third-party escrow account. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact associated with this action remains the same as the previous agreement as amended. The City's share of the backbone expense, for FY 2004/2005 year is $238,756. The City's annual share will increase no more than 2% per year until July 2008. At that time, the City's share of the FY 2002/2003 backbone costs, which were initially borne by Orange County, will be paid in full. This will amount to a decrease of $23,388 in the City's annual backbone costs. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: J mes G. Ross ecutive Director ublic Works Agency ':\~~"""t"\. ~r J.. ~ ~~:--.~ Francisco Gutierrez ~ Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 258-2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ~ ~ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 APPROVED TITLE: AMEND AGREEMENT WITH SIMPLEX/GRINNELL, LP FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT CARD ACCESS SYSTEM o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For ~ , i A 2' / ./ ,/ .-/ / !/4-~ {L,,- CI Y MANAGER CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment to the agreement with Simplex/Grinnell, LP for the installation and service of two additional card readers for the Police Department's access control system, increasing the compensation of the agreement by $4,000, for a total compensation not to exceed $27,248. DISCUSSION The Police Department currently uses the card access control system as part of the controlled entry into the Police Administration Building, Jail facility and a portion of City Hall. This agreement provides for the maintenance and support needed for this system. Simplex/Grinnell, LP, is uniquely qualified to provide these services as they designed and implemented the system. Under the terms of this amendment, the Police Department will receive two new card readers to enhance the security of the buildings. The installation and associated service of the readers are included under the terms of the agreement. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Police Department's Property & Building Other Contractual Services Account (account no. 011-350-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ) ! [" '- -_ <.:!~lC( ~'-_ 0:\ Paul M. Walters Chief of Police Police Department ':::{ \\S)j'\\1~ ">- \~ ~.1 ~... Fiancisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgrnt. Services Agency 25C-1 25C-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM ~. hi. / /,... /~ f4,,, ~7(2--- cnV MANAGER APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO tf FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with the Orange County Sanitation District for joint funding of sewer projects for an amount not to exceed $300,000 under the Cooperative Projects Program. DISCUSSION The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has implemented a Cooperative Projects Program to assist cities with the rehabilitation of deteriorated sewer facilities. The program provides matching funds for qualified projects. The primary objectives of the program are to reduce inflow and infiltration into sewer mains and to repair or replace deteriorated sewer infrastructure. The City recently applied for and received approval from the OCSD for $300,000 for video inspections of approximately fifty miles of sewer mains in targeted areas citywide. This proj ect will enable staff to identify and prioritize sewer repair and replacement projects. The City will provide up to $150,000 of funding and the OCSD will match this amount. The Orange County Sanitation District requires an agreement for this project. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. 250-1 Agreement with Orange County Sanitation District March 21, 2005 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the entire $300,000 project cost are available in the Sanitary Sewer Service Fund (account no. 56-575-6291). Upon project completion, OCSD will reimburse the City for 50% of the actual project costs up to a maximum of $150,000. r/vLA)t /2 Ja9'les G. Ross Executive Director ~ublic Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: '~h\(\~\~l'.\ ~~l ~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency ,f I JGR/TC/RFCA03-21/0rangeCtyAggreSanitatiOnDist.JGR 250-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: AGREEMENT WITH HUNTER AND ORGERON FOR RENTAL OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1249 W. FIRST STREET (PROJECT 1819) APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 15t Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For /'/ " ~L. CONTINUED TO -- ----- -,..~ FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute a rental agreement with property owners Creighton Hunter, Betty Hunter, Fred Orgeron and Brenda Orgeron totaling $33,000. DISCUSSION The Bristol Street widening proj ect from Pine Street to Third Street requires acquisition of the property located at 1249 W. First Street (Exhibit 1). On February 22, 2005, the City Council approved a relocation agreement with Apollo Muffler shop, the tenant at 1249 W. First Street. Apollo Muffler plans to vacate the property on March 31, 2005. In order to avoid incurring any additional relocation costs, Federal regulations require execution of a rental agreement with the property owners to insure fair compensation under the current lease with Apollo Muffler shop. The rental agreement will authorize payment to the property owner in the amount of $3,300 per month, for a maximum of 10 months. During that time, staff will continue negotiations with the property owners to reach a settlement. Rent will be paid up to the date the City acquires ownership of the property. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been determined to be adequately evaluated in previously prepared Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Assessment EIR No. 89-01 approved by City Council in 1990. 25E-1 Agreement With Hunter And Orgeron For Rental Of Property March 21, 2005 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the proposed acquisitions are available in the Select Street Construction Fund (account no. 59-551-6611, project no. 1819). m~A:~ am s G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency 25E-2 APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: '{~;\<~r-l ~ ~~ l'~'~Q^- Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency rI PlAt _s >aJICT SITE LOCATION '\ 2ND STREET t- W W 0:: t- en .....J o t- en - a::: OJ 1249 W. FIRST STREET APN 008-131-33 1ST STREET ( EXHIBIT 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE March 21, 2005 TITLE: AGREEMENT WITH HUNTER AND ORGERON FOR RENTAL OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1249 W. FIRST STREET (PROJECT 1819) ~ N.T.s. 25E-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR WARNER AVENUE BRIDGE WIDENING (PROJECT 04-1003) APPROVED D As Recommended D As Amended D Ordinance on 151 Reading D Ordinance on 2nd Reading D Implementing Resolution D Set Public Hearing For ;:)/ ~ / / , /.. /)J7~' f ./ i,' . i ' " / II' . J, /~ / J . [{.l'-v~ )"-/ ""c r.:t....~. l. I' 'J - CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO ---------........... , FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with the County of Orange for the widening of Warner Avenue from the Fountain Valley city limit to Harbor Boulevard, including the bridge over the Santa Ana River. DISCUSSION Warner Avenue is one of the maj or arterial highways in the County, extending from Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Huntington Beach to Redhill Avenue in the City of Tustin. The County of Orange is lead agency for the widening of Warner Avenue from the Fountain Valley city limit to Harbor Boulevard including the widening of the bridge over the Santa Ana River. A portion of the project between the bridge and Harbor Boulevard is within the City of Santa Ana (Exhibit 1). Currently the bridge consists of two westbound and three eastbound lanes with no sidewalks. The widening will allow for three lanes in each direction including bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides. Other improvements include storm drains, retaining walls, landscaping and street lighting. The Warner Avenue widening proj ect, which is scheduled to begin in August 2005, has an estimated cost of $4,210,000. Santa Ana has agreed to reimburse the County $110,000 for the cost of improvements within Santa Ana's city limits. 25F-1 Cooperative Agreement With The County Of Orange for Warner Avenue Bridge Widening (Project 04-1003) March 21, 2005 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is exempt from further review. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was filed for this project by the County of Orange. FISCAL IMPACT Funding in the amount of $75,000 is available in the Select Street Construction Fund (account no. 59-551-6631, project no. 04-1003) and the TSIA Area E Fund (account no. 34-631-6631, project no. 04-1003). The remaining $35,000 will be budgeted in FY 05/06 Capital Improvement Program. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~C\~~~lW'),.) ~~.~.u h Francisco Gutierrez / '/ Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 25F-2 WARNER BRIDGE (COUNTY OWNED) ~ N.T.S. CITY OF SANTA ANA WEST CITY LIMIT EXHIBIT 1 SANTA ANA a PW A t , , CITY COUNCL AGENDA DAlE: MARCH 21. 2005 Title: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR WARNER AVENUE BRIDGE WIDENING (PROJECT 04-1003) PIllE _5 AC[NCY K:\pr-oJec1.S \deSlgn \oc "IV. \w.stmlnst.e.. \r f ce.dgn 25F-3 25F-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~i ~ta~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: ~ MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-01 AND MINOR EXCEPTION NO. 2005-01 TO ALLOW A CHURCH IN THE TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE (R2) ZONING DISTRICT AT 1201 WEST SECOND STREET - STARLIGHT BAP~+-ST C~CH, APPLICANT /:; '7 / ,,/ " I / ,-'- .-' / ./ /~",/~rl'1/ ::~~l-' CITY MANAGER APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO ------- FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive and file the staff report approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 as conditioned and Minor Exception No. 2005-01 as conditioned. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION On February 28, 2005, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 as conditioned and Minor Exception No. 2005-01 as conditioned by a vote of 6:0 (Cribb absent) to allow a church in the two- family residence (R2) zoning district and allow an off-site parking lot across the street at 1201 West Second Street. The Planning Commission made no changes to the recommended conditions of approval outlined in the attached staff report (Exhibit A) . FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Ste en G. Hardi g Executive Director Planning & Building Agency AN:rb an\plancomm\cup05-01me05-01.cc 31A-1 REQUEST FOR Planning Commission Action (~I ~~~ / l' --....... I \',~ca IOn 1St ; ~ PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2005 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - FILED BY STARLIGHT BAPTIST CHURCH FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-01 AND MINOR EXCEPTION NO. 2005-01 TO ALLOW A CHURCH IN THE TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE (R2) ZONING DISTRICT AT 1201 WEST SECOND STREET Prepared by Ann Hsin-An Ni APPROVED D As Recommended D As Amended D Set Public Hearing For DENIED D Applicant's Request D Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO 4f;12!:i;eclor ~nning Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2002-446. 2. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 as conditioned. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Minor Exception No. 2005-01 as conditioned. DISCUSSION Request of Applicant Starlight Baptist Church is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 to allow a church in the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district at 1201 West Second Street and Minor Exception No. 2005-01 to allow off-site parking on a lot across the street at 1137 West Second Street. Property Description The subj ect property consists of two sites. Both sites are flat and rectangular in shape. Site 1, the church parcel, is a 0.59-acre parcel presently occupied by a church, a single-family residence and two apartment units. Site 1 is located on the west side of Baker Street in the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district and has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential at seven dwelling units per acre (LR7). The property is surrounded by a combination of single- family and multi-family residential to the north, south, east and west. EXHIBIT A 31A-2 Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 Minor Exception No. 2005-01 February 28, 2005 Page 2 Site 2, the proposed parking lot, is a 0.28-acre parcel located on the east side of Baker Street between Second and Third Streets and is currently vacant. Site 2 is located in the Professional (P) zoning district and has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential at seven dwelling units per acre (LR7). This property is surrounded by a combination of single-family and multi-family residential to the north, south, east and west (Exhibits 1 and 2) . Project Description The proposed project involves the demolition of the existing 2,200 square foot church, the single-family residence and two apartment units, and the construction of a new two-story, 7,651 square foot church with office space, three classrooms and a community meeting room. The main assembly room includes a pew-seating area that is designed for approximately 148 parishioners. The church will hold two services at 7:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. on Sundays (Exhibits 3 and 4) . Access to the proposed proj ect will be provided from Second and Baker Streets. A total of 50 parking spaces will be provided, exceeding the minimum requirement by one space. Twenty-seven spaces will be located on- site and the remaining 23 spaces will be on the adj acent parcel across Baker Street. A minor exception is required to allow parking immediately across a street. The architectural style proposed for this proj ect will complement the residential structures in the vicinity. The exterior material proposed includes a metal seam roof, tile coping, brick veneer, and decorative window surrounds. Additionally, stained glass windows from the existing church are features to be used on the elevations (Exhibit 5). Analysis of the Issues The church use was originally established in 1941 by Second Baptist Church. Starlight Baptist Church moved to this location in 1977 and has been in operation for over 20 years. Due to the growth of the congregation and a need to modernize their facilities, the Starlight Baptist Church proposes to construct a new two-story, 7,651 square foot church at the same location to replace the existing church. Since a church use is conditionally permitted in the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district under the current code, expansion of the church requires a conditional use permit. 31A-3 Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 Minor Exception No. 2005-01 February 28, 2005 Page 3 The proposed church meets all development standards, including setbacks and parking. A total of 27 parking spaces will be provided on-site with the remaining 23 spaces provided on the site across Baker Street, satisfying the minimum requirement for the sanctuary area of 49 spaces. Additionally, high quality building materials are proposed which will contribute to the overall quality of the neighborhood. A clearly delineated pedestrian walkway is proposed to direct pedestrians from the off-site parking lot to the intersection and to the main church entrance. This walkway is intended to provide access to the church building and improve pedestrian safety. Also, a six-foot high concrete block wall is proposed along the west property of site 1 and the north and east property lines of site 2 with a six to seven foot landscape planter to provide adequate buffer to the adjacent residential use. Additionally, twenty-one 24-inch box Brisbane Box (Tristania Conferta) will be planted within the landscape area to provide screening and shade within the parking area (Exhibit 6). The architectural style proposed is designed to be compatible with the scale, style and character of the surrounding neighborhood. The church use is conditionally permitted within the zone and the proposal meets all development standards. Further, the project complies with the provisions set forth in the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district and the Land Use Element of the General Plan. As a result, staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 and Minor Exception No. 2005-01 as conditioned (Exhibits 7 and 8) . CEQA Compliance In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2002-446 has been prepared for this project (Exhibit 9). /JU-/nl; , Artn Hsin-An Ni Associate Planner J~ AN:JM an\plancomm\cup05-01me05-01.pC 31A-4 R2 .j;,I~ 0 R1 R1 12TH :)1 R1 R1 lllH ~I L Rl 10IH bl ]C Rl o R1 I 9TH ST. R1 Rl~344' ~: p t-107 R1 R2 '~~~ LLJ ~~, '----J~LJDAV oL-l"rn-~ [HLJ LJ IR2 R2 ITl ~ 8' R1 z Rl Rl .Rl R2 R2 D r;h; SP 1 Rl ~ ~ L....L 155 ~ P P P R1 R1 P R2 , "' "' "'", ITB ~tg , , n)~ GO o~ 1~~[ ~\ OGC 801~D Do O"~ ~ H ~1 10 DO~i[ f7;PROJECT SITE~ ~ I p t p I:E "I ,'~ ':" so.,: SO., :r;- II!:' S018 .,. IE FIRST ST. C1 R2 R1 R2 C1 R2 II C2 o o -c.- :c o :C i :c : :c= 01 ~ ~ i~[D~D nnnn-n~n WAlNUT 5T R2 R2 HIGHlA S R1 A1 -B C-SM C1 C1-MD C2 C3 C3-A C4 C5 GENERAL AGRICULTURAL PARKING MODIFICATION COMMERCIAL SOUTH MAIN COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL COMM. COMMERCIAUMUSEUM DISTRICT GENERAL COMMERCIAL CENTRAL BUSINESS CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST VILLAGE PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL CR GC M1 M2 MO o P PCD PRD COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT CENTER LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL MILITARY OPERATIONS OPEN SPACE PROFESSIONAL PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT R1 R2 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE MULTIPLE DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBURBAN APARTMENTS RESIDENTIAL ESTATE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC PLAN R4 RE SD SP A CUP 05-1/ME 05-1 STARLIGHT BAPTIST CHURCH 1137 & 1201 WEST SECOND STREET A &V' - = 500 FEET 1" = 1000 FEET P LAN N N G AND BU LD EXHIBIT 1 31A-5 N G AGE N C Y ~-J ::>~ LE~ ~~ ~f2 ~Cl: ~-J ::>~ LE~ f';:9 5m ::>Cl: .... o -J .... ~ (3 ~ .... SINGL FAMILY W RESID NTIAL W a: .... (/) FAMIL Y NTIA MULTI FAMILY SINGL FAMILY RESI ENTlAL RESID NTlAL THIRD SINGLE MILY MULTI MILY RESIDE TlAL RESIDE TlAL Q~ ::>j::: LE~ ~~ ~~ <J) Q;; ::>~ LE~ f';:9 5m ::>Cl: SINGLE FAMILY RES, Q;;! ::>~ LE~ i=:~ 5Lu ::>Cl: Q-J ::>~ LE~ LuLu -J9 ~f2 ~Cl: MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SECOND SINGLE FA MIL RESIDENTI L RETAIL SPORTS SHOP PARKING LIQUOR SALON, INSURANCE, ~ ~ BOTANICAL, i=: iJi RESTAURANT Lu ~~ :::>Cl: <{lJ.i <J) FIRST OFF CE B ILDING >--J ~~ LE~ i=:9 5<J) ::>~ Q-J ::>~ LE~ ~~ ~m (jjCl: Q-J Q~ ::>~ ::>i=: LE~ LE~ f';:9 ~~ MULTI FAMILY ~~ ~f2 RESIDENTIAL ~Cl: STREET Q-J ::>~ SIN LE LE~ MULTI FAMILY ~~ RESID NTlAL FA LY ~m R ~Cl: SIN LE MUL I FA IL Y SINGLE FA LY RE IDEN IAL FAMILY R RES. STREET MUL TI FAMILY a: RESIDENTIAL W ~ < m >--J ~"< ::>i=: LE~ f';:9 5f2 ::>Cl: SINGL FA ILY R SIDEN IAL AUTO SERVICE SINGLE FAM. RESIDENTIAL PARKING OFFICES STREET ~ ~ CUP 05-1/ME 05-1 STARLIGHT BAPTIST CHURCH 1137 & 1201 WEST SECOND STREET A r9Y' P LAN D ENe Y N N G A N EXHIBIT 2 31A-6 B U L D N G A G COLl6 ~:> '~NV "lNVS lmlS ONZ At lOll rOLZ6 '(J ..., VlI#S J33illS ONZ It. IOZ l HJ~nHJ lSIldV8 lH;JIl~V1S NVld 31lS ~i:. Ii (~II~' $.I~i .-i .=..1' i~iri I:i j is! il.:,. i:IIU i;s;! ..il" ii ~--1 .liIi ' ill /r...I.. I~" 11'1 ~ :J ----1' !;Ill!l! .:,' mi !Il '::il~= I'ilt i ..~~~S: ,J Ih...! _..I! .;;:1 f<. i !ji; 8~! .! IIi I .;:e m~lS ~ I!I d Hi _ ~ UI J ,j H ~ .Ii JJ1' _-_--_.J- I,~~j~~~{~;+l:~~ ~~_. I, L ;ii i !~ ~ : ~ l' I!~ I, ~ ~<' . ~ --', d, -.~; -/- s .. ~ :i: tl ~.. "...':. z: lO'rAI~ . - , ' t;:; I:, .'"~ ':' <':> M. I ."'" V) _ . .0-5'/ '~ ~ ...'.sl'.. .'" ';:'~':-' :::s~ SN, ~!'s <t:.'. I Z !.i. .-::-:!l M\'IQOJ ....;:; '.' )." ~ -'~~:~~'JJll.l.z J..'- !. :,i ~ ~ I 'n!~-O;- .n.__ i::::~./. ;.~. ~:' ~ .. Ol I . !' ~ ~ C'.' ! N -",: ~ : '~t; e:: W i a I- ..~ l:i I ;0 -~ : ~ I,.... d g .... '; ~ ,---' -",:,4... -"-'--'j' _.'." ~~~ g " )' ~ k\:l; ~l8-- ____un -: ., ~ ~ " u: · ~....,.. "',';W:'''''','''''':=lg ~. ~ uD ~~I @ i 2(~ ~ --J ~~~/: ~A ~ -:-I~-- -.0~n--r'. ' '---@ _ ~--(f.~:~_'UN ~ .. @ , ':__ ~ "H__~ ~' n ". ' ii, 0.;, J D L ~" \L ~ I\-J~_~ 1.- -;-~::~ -. 4 ~ ,.! t::: = ;1',." ~.~ e ~ I ~ , 0 V) CD : .u-,il I I ---- I~ . ; ., - ~ g 51 ! I liJ:!f1 L~ J S~II:!~I ! - 19r1ilt~111 a. t~, ~'l - -< .~I!'ml' 2 - ~ I dl..1 I B i z . 0 :> . I -/ h- r I / 7J~=ccb~;;'='"_: -_ld II JcC'~"~=C~ ~'~ - t: I: .. ~-_U-'--lI\: ~ In , r........!Ia...iI ;'.;! i! '. r ! ! ~ H;;jh I: ~I r ; 5 s ~ p ; hiim;iUs J !; I. I: : IimU;:d:i~Hie <<>t 813 I I I' I P h ii "'. ...... '", , ! I 'I I l! Il .. ]~j~ liilli't I! I j II, IWi I, ~ 11II ! I S I h I i ~ 1111 h ~ h ~ : ~ !!lbn!1 !!ii!iH!, I pit: H ;fini hlihl:r:hnHI~~! !t! !idL !;, o ee E:l e €I' """"" '_._~"_ _""':.~.:w"'''' \.-,..., ) ~ I~.... ~ ,='" i !! I ~ , \ ~I ~ ..~~ "~'I ' ....u .___1 .. r ~. ,\0, ~~-~@ I:, G: =', "L:!. H;~~ r- 01 '''" .~~~:;-- ~". ~, ~:~: ..,,'" ~~:;;- ~c> I '''-. '/rU' ~ :.~~:- "'g ....... ;"'5 ~,:~:. . :SF l:s!:: ='8n' -"c, CD!;;;, CDg :'/. d'; I ''':::.~! 1 ., ~ @ /<< . @ ! u.-<<r1".. ~ e " ~ ' -" "'-Mli_,;-, "'-'_/ ~ - :! . i! > i: '. , . @ ~.-._" I r.. ~,I .)', ! n 5 r ,9, I ~ i ~. . ~""~ i CD ,;:a ~ ""2 ~ ~~~ I ~Sl :~:::..._ frM, >>-J:l @~.o:: ;'- 0-'. '~.r'-' @ '~'~>:' ,!; ~~ : I" ~ @ I~c ~ ,_" ._ iL~,:~,:~;:~: A~P~~J ~.~. .... ;f~_:~i~~I.;~i;~UJ~ j~-. -: 1JJ ." _.. ~~. '. . ".. !~,' ~ ,~- '-" .--.'?.t:le~A'~" ~ ; 1 , . "r'l; . ." .' ; ; ", he- "'ltl, ~ ,', ". ,;" 'i . n" \.. ',d .' ; '.1 I-I L""".,l.!. ~ ~ ~. --~~-:~=~=~:.. :3fJ=tf_- := --. :\i~~'.~~-=~":=~=~~:c::::=~ CUfJ:l)t-MII' 05 1 nwlBf,. 3 (~ ," ".~ .0-. . ",. a~IHl 1:"::. .~ .;;"" '-. - ! )i '. '''..:. : ~ " @,' ~ ,) .... '" << 0. '-,K o~ 0 .- -. << l\ b ,;; :z ~ ~ I '111 'il1l0J 10~YIN . A C1Ot-6K-tIL CO~G6 'n 'V1\V V.LNVS DHIH)~Y 'Ii '~; ; , O~1!1bV ~ I 1.33l!l.S puZ '.I( JOGI ' ' SOlNVS . . . . . . . . : ~ H:JdnHJ .LSI.LdVa lH::ll1l1VlS oaNY1O~ ~ . II ~l " -I II ., "., . ~l II ~ I' ~ -' .' ." -:- "j~-' ill' ;0-:, .. I "I' ~ fl: :~~fi:ffr~r~~~r:! .~~ <Q '--7,.a / " / -.. / v ~ / : ~ ~ / 't</ "';j /...... / ~ .' € 5. ". '>j ++t-- ~ r f I i" L..,J~..,....-~l..~ 1 ,~~l=_L. ...1 ' 1==----= CU OS-1 ~~ T~ II t il :u: o :j ~ ;! J~ .J < ~ . " . l - <: :: .1' . - ~ jl , ~I :t 15'..l <Jl.~ ~'" " ; .... ijj ~ ~~ f ~ II 11 ~j ~ I .. I I I jml [E] 1m . I i I I i 'I~ i I I >\ J , , ~;~~-~- ~ ii ~0I\ 'TI- l:t ,- - - '~ iJ::3 c~ --~1 -: /.. ~: II! I I ,4 I ~I{~'i ~ J ~~~' CUP&tA05-1 oar 'QaOi 10lV"Y CIOt-6y';-Hl ~01.Z6 -V:J 'VNV \ll!\'VS l3:3:llJ.S pUG 'Jl 1081 HJlIDIlJ lSlldVlI LHDl1llYJ.S II ()j I' ; UJ 0311HJ~V orilnbv SOlNVS , OONI'10~ ~ .I:~; . ~ : ~ t i : : '~l . . . . C\l 'f - ,. E .: i -~; . ~ - ~ ~-0'-J 1 ....,... HCT5 ~I ~ ~ .....,. ....111.1. ...-.. . . - " " ., '.' II t 'II Ui IMi~t I III '. flll~llllt III 1 Hi il ! 'lI ,'.1 .' 111'1 1.1 1~ pIll! 11111 " ~ sll !tl 11.11'1 1 ihlll! lIi!.lll f Ilni B I I (I t 11 II, ,I.. .-!-.1 d 1111111, 1111.1 ill. ; . I ellllllt lit) Ii i pI! llihll,h!h Ilii~JII I ~lilli u ~ HI 11'1 · · iSislS II Iii; Ipll11 )le"l .' dnIH1l!iINI s=IIII~111Itl ! IfJIIH ,1;..' I 11!'tU!li111 J l~l~IHI !u~ill! i t I u hi . I ;' - '" ( y \ .. J ...... PMODeS ~ (;} ., . .' :." . ' . " '. : ....... . .' .' '. . , ' .' -. .,' . ". .' ' ." '.. ' . '. . , .' .' ,-'..., ,. . L ,'... ". . '. . .. . . . '. . .. .. '. '.' " . . '. ,'. .:. . . . , . CUP 05-1/ME 05-1 EXHIBIT 6 1"- 31~-1a'" Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 February 28, 2005 Page 1 of 2 Findings of Fact A. Wi 11 the proposed contribute to the community? use provide general well a service being of or the facility which will neighborhood or the The proposed church facility, as conditioned, will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood and the community by providing religious and educational services that enhance the local community. B. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity? The proposed church will not be detrimental to the general welfare and safety of the surrounding businesses and residents. The proposed church is in compliance with Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code with respect to parking, setbacks and landscaping. Additionally, mitigation measures have been incorporated to minimize the potential impacts generated from the proposed project. C. Will the proposed stability or future the area? use adversely affect the present economic economic development of properties surrounding The proposed church will provide an additional service to the surrounding commercial and residential uses wi thin the vicinity. The City's zoning code allows the church use in the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district with a conditional use permit. The church facility will provide services that compliment the surrounding residential neighborhood. As conditioned, the use should enhance rather than adversely affect economic development or stability of the area. D. will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use. The proposed use will be in compliance with the applicable sections of Chapter 41 of the Municipal Code with an approved conditional use permit for the proposed church facility. Additionally, the proposed church facility will be in compliance with the mitigation measures identified in the Negative Declaration. J:*~11 Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 February 28, 2005 Page 2 of 2 E. will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any specific plan of the City? The proposed church is in an area designated Low Density Residential, seven dwelling units per acre (LR7) in the General Plan. The use is consistent with the General Plan and zoning district that allows a church facility. 31&12 Minor Exception No. 2005-01 February 28, 2005 Page 1 of 1 Findings of Fact A. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, that the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at minor exception with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this Chapter. There are special circumstances to the subject property. The subject property contains two sites. Site 1 is located on the northwest corner of Second and Baker Streets and Site 2 is located across Baker Street on the northeast corner of Baker and Second Streets. Sufficient parking will be provided on both Site 1 and Site 2 for the proposed church use. Additionally, a covenant is required to be recorded to restrict the use of the parking lot on Site 2 for the church only. B. That the granting of a minor preservation and enjoyment of rights. exception is necessary one or more substantial for the property The granting of the minor exception is necessary to develop the property with a parking lot ancillary to the church use across the street so that sufficient parking will be provided for the church. C. That the granting of a minor exception will not detrimental to the public welfare or injurious property. be to materially surrounding The granting of the minor exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property because the proposed parking lot complies with all development standards set forth in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including setbacks and landscaping. D. That the granting of a minor exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The granting of the minor exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City since the proposed parking lot is designed in conformance with the Professional zoning district development standards and General Plan requirements. 31A313 FEBRUARY 28, 2005 PAGE 1 OF4 Conditions for Approval Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Commission, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit. A. Planning Division 1. The proj ect shall remain in compliance with Site Plan Review DP No. 2002-93. 2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit must be amended. 3. The use of the property is limited to a church and related parish buildings and activities. No thrift shops, food distribution programs, full-time parochial school, nor rehabilitation programming may occur on the premises. 4. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, a covenant to tie the parking lot use at 1137 West Second Street with the church across the street at 1201 West Second Street shall be recorded. 5. The starting and ending times of church services should be spaced at least one hour to minimize the overlap of departing attendees and arriving attendees. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, the landscape plans shall be revised to reflect 24 - inch boxed size trees and 5- gallon shrubs for all required plants of this project. :ff~~1 a FEBRUARY 28, 2005 PAGE20F4 7. After proj ect occupancy, landscaping is to be maintained to include the minimum level of plant materials installed at the time of occupancy. 8. Public payphones, if provided, may only be located within buildings or in the interior of the site. Mitigation Measures 9. During construction, the contractor would be required to comply with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403 to suppress dust generated by construction operations. To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans for the proposed project shall reflect the appropriate notes. 10. All materials excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amount of dust. 11. All clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph averaged over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. 12. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. 13. All materials transported off-site shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 14. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. 15. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. 16. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for on-site and off-site construction activities. 17. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval a surface drainage/grading plan/erosion control plan, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, showing the direction and means of flow to adj acent streets. The plan is to include existing and proposed elevations at and adj acent to all property lines. Drainage routed to the street must be directed beneath the sidewalk and through the curb. 31A-715 FEBRUARY 28, 2005 PAGE30F4 18. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, a remediation plan shall be prepared and approved by the City of Santa Ana to remove asbestos containing building materials. 19. The removal of asbestos containing building materials shall be conducted by a state licensed contractor. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit, which includes a copy of the project permit number and two copies of the storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare an NPDES post-construction storm water management plan per Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) that includes all structural and non-structural Best Management Practices. a. Submit and have approved a surface drainage/utility plan that includes all Structural Best Management Practices. b. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management plan that includes a description of all applicable Structural and Non- Structural Best Management Practices, which may apply to this project. 22. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare a surface water runoff study to show existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adj acent storm drain facility. 23. Grading plans and building plans for the proposed project shall note that construction activities on the project site shall be limited to the hours of 7: 00 a. m. to 8: 00 p. m. Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays and not permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. 31A-716 FEBRUARY 28, 2005 PAGE 4 OF4 B. Police Department 1. All structures and parking lot must conform to the provisions of Chapter 8, Article II Division 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Building Security Ordinance). These code conditions will require that the existing project's lighting, door/window devices and addressing be upgraded to current code standards. Lighting standards cannot be located in required landscape planters. 31A-717 FEBRUARY 28, 2005 PAGEIOF3 Conditions for Approval Minor Exception No. 2005-01 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Commission, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this minor exception. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the minor exception. A. Planning Division 1. The proj ect shall remain in compliance with Site Plan Review DP No. 2002-93. 2. Any amendment to this minor exception must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit must be amended. 3. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, a covenant to tie the parking lot use at 1137 West Second Street with the church across the street at 1201 West Second Street shall be recorded. 4. The starting and ending times of church services should be spaced at least one hour to minimize the overlap of departing attendees and arriving attendees. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the landscape plans shall be revised to reflect 24 - inch boxed size trees and 5- gallon shrubs for all required plants of this project. 6. After proj ect occupancy, include the minimum level time of occupancy. landscaping is to be maintained to of plant materials installed at the 31A"718 FEBRUARY 28, 2005 PAGE 2 OF 3 Mitigation Measures 7. During construction, the contractor would be required to comply with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403 to suppress dust generated by construction operations. To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans for the proposed project shall reflect the appropriate notes. 8. All materials excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amount of dust. 9. All clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph averaged over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. 10. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. 11. All materials transported off-site shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 12. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. 13. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. 14. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for on-site and off-site construction activities. 15. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval a surface drainage/grading plan/erosion control plan, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, showing the direction and means of flow to adj acent streets. The plan is to include existing and proposed elevations at and adj acent to all property lines. Drainage routed to the street must be directed beneath the sidewalk and through the curb. 16. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, a shall be prepared and approved by the City remove asbestos containing building materials. remediation plan of Santa Ana to 31Ar19 FEBRUARY 28, 2005 PAGE30F3 17. The removal of asbestos containing building materials shall be conducted by a state licensed contractor. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the proj ect applicant shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit, which includes a copy of the project permit number and two copies of the storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare an NPDES post-construction storm water management plan per Orange County Drainage Area Management plan (DAMP) that includes all structural and non-structural Best Management Practices. a. Submit and have approved a surface drainage/utility plan that includes all Structural Best Management Practices. b. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management plan that includes a description of all applicable Structural and Non-Structural Best Management Practices, which may apply to this project. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare a surface water runoff study to show existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adj acent storm drain facility. 21. Grading plans and building plans for the proposed project shall note that construction activities on the project site shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays and not permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. B. Police Department 1. All structures and parking lot must conform to the provisions of Chapter 8, Article II Division 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Building Security Ordinance). These code conditions will require that the existing project's lighting, door/window devices and addressing be upgraded to current code standards. Lighting standards cannot be located in required landscape planters. 31Ay20 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Lisa Bist COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Carlos Bustamante Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. Box 1988. Santa Ana, California 92702 (714) 667-2700. Fax (714) 973-1461 www.santa-ana,org CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION This is to inform the general public that the City of Santa Ana proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration for the following project: Project Title: Starlight Baptist Church Project Description: The proposed project is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a church within a residential district. Additionally, a Minor Exception is requested to allow an offsite parking area across the street from the proposed project. Project Location: 1201 West Second Street Project Number: ER 2002-446 Public Review Period: 1-30-2005 to 2-19-2005 Hearing Date: 2-28-2005 Hearing Location: City of Santa Ana Council Chambers 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 The Negative Declaration and Initial Study as well as all referenced documents will be available for public review at the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency located at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. Please submit any comments on the Negative Declaration to the City on or before 2-17-2005. Please direct your comments to: Dan Bott, Environmental Coordinator, City of Santa Ana, P.O. Box 1988, M-20, Santa Ana, CA, 92702. If you have any questions or would like any additional information, please contact Dan Bott at (714) 667-2700. 31A~I'IT9 1 of 48 MA YOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Lisa Bist COUNCIL MEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Car/os Bustamante Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ <.' ~ ~ducation lS~t t,.7 ~~ CITY OF SANTA ANA CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (,\01-20) P.O. BOX 1988 . Santa Ana, Caliiornia 92702 (7141 667-2700. Fax (714) 973-1461 www.sanra-ana.org MITI.<3ATED NEGATIVE 'bECIJ~RAtlt>.N Pursuant to the Procedures of the City of Santa Ana for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Evaluator has completed an Initial Study for the project described below: Project Number: ER 2002.446 Applicant: Starlight Baptist Church, 1201 W. Second St. Santa Ana, CA Project Location I Address: 1201 West Second Street Project Title I Description: The proposed project is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a church within a residential district. Additionally, a Minor Exception is requested to allow an offsite parking area across the street from the proposed project. And does hereby find: That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case oecause of revisions to the project and mitigation measures placed on the project, ~nd agreed to by the applicant, reduce each impact to below a level of significance. Signature: Y6N\. .... Environmental Coordinator Date: / - B.'1-2~ This determination is not final until adopted by the decision-making body or administrative official, and a Notice of Determination is filed. 31A-22 CS '3>).-2 2 of 48 Starlight Baptist Church Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ER 2002-446 REQUEST The proposed project is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a church within a residential district. Additionally, a Minor Exception is requested to allow an offsite parking area across the street from the proposed project. EXISTING SETTING The project site is located 1201 West Second Street. The property is located within the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district and has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential at seven dwelling units per acre (LR7). The site is surrounded by single-family residences to the east, multi-family residences to the west, a combination of single- family and multi-family residences to the south and the north. The project includes two sites, site 1 is approximately 0.59 acres in area and site 2 is 0.28 acres in size. Both sites are flat and rectangular in shape. Site 1 is presently occupied by, a church, one single-family residence and two apartment units. Si te 2 is currently vacant. The property is located on both sides of Baker Street, between Second and Third Streets. Baker, Second and Third Streets are designated non-arterial streets in the General Plan Circulation Element. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project involves the construction of a new 7,151 square foot church with meeting room, offices and classrooms to replace the existing 2,200 square foot church facility, single family dwelling and apartment structure. The interior seating capacity is designed for approximately 148 parishioners. The church will hold two services at 7:00 am and 12:00 pm on Sundays. Access to the project would be provided from Second and Baker Streets. A total of 51 parking spaces would be on-site with 28 spaces on Site 1 and the remaining 23 spaces provided on the adjacent Site 2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The following is an environmental analysis on the proposed project, based on the City of Santa Ana's CEQA Environmental 31A-23 3 of 48 Checklist. For each environmental issue, the analysis identifies the level of impact that is anticipated to occur. Where needed, mitigation measures have been identified to reduce potential impacts to a level that is below significant. I. AESTHETICS A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a State highway? No Impact The City's Urban Design Element indicates that there are no scenic vistas or scenic resources on the project site or within the nearby vicinity. Additionally, there are no State Highways near the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to any onsite or adjacent scenic resource. C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and it's surrounding? Less Than Significant Impact According to the City's Urban Design Element, the project site is located within the Flower Park Design District. The Urban Design Element establishes goals and policies to help guide the design of development projects proposed within a Design District. Specifically, land uses proposed within a Design District should exhibit high quality design and should incorporate design elements that are proportional and aesthetically related to the District setting. Through the City's development review process the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the intent of the Urban Design Element. Compliance with the Urban Design Element would reduce potential aesthetic impacts to a level considered less than significant. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not degrade the existing visual character of the project site or the surrounding area. D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact 2 31A-24 4 of 48 Implementation of the proposed project would not introduce substantial amounts of new lighting into the project area. Therefore, the proposed would not result in significant light and glare impacts within the project area. II. AGRICULTURE A. Convert Prime Far.mland, Unique Far.mland or Far.mland of Statewide Importance to non-agriculture use? B. Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use or a Williamson Contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Far.mland, to non-agriculture use? No Impact According to the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program and the City's General Plan, the project site does not contain prime or unique farmland. Additionally, based on a site visit conducted by the City's Environmental Coordinator, the project site is currently not in agricultural production. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of any prime or unique farmland. III. AIR QUALITY A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or congestion Management Plan? No Impact The proposed project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin and subject to the requirements of the Clear Air Act at both the Federal and State level, as implemented by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is the primary planning document to monitor if air quality standards and objectives are being achieved in the South Coast Air Basin. The air quality objectives in the AQMP are based upon population and growth projections provided in regional plans and local general plans. A project could be in conflict with the AQMP if it results in population and growth impacts beyond those identified in a regional plans and/or local general plans. 3 31A-25 5 of 48 The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan and would not exceed the population and growth projections for the City. Therefore, it would not be in conflict with the population and growth projections established in the South Coast Air Quality Management District AQMP. B. Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or proposed air quality violation? C. Resul t in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less Than Significant Impact As mentioned previously, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulates air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. The South Coast Air Basin is currently a non-attainment area for carbon monoxide, ozone, particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide. The SCAQMD considers an a~r quality impact to be significant if it exceeds the thresholds identified below. EMISSION THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Pollutant Construction Tons/ Pounds/Day Quarter Carbon Monoxide 550 24.75 Reactive Organic Compounds 75 2.5 Nitrogen Oxides 100 2.5 Particulate Matter 150 6.75 Project Operations Pounds/Day 550 55 55 150 Long-Ter.m Operational Air Quality Impacts The primary source of long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project would be generated by vehicle travel to and from the project site. However, mobile emissions generated by the proposed project are expected to be less than significant. A relatively minor amount of gaseous emissions would also occur from natural gas and electricity usage. Less than significant long-term air quality impacts are anticipated to occur. Short-ter.m Constructed Related Air Quality Impacts 4 31A-26 6 of 48 Construction operations associated with the proposed project could potentially result in short-term increases in particulate mater, and to a lesser degree increases in carbon monoxide and ozone. Peak day construction emissions for most pollutants arising from construction of the proposed proj ect would occur during the grading and demolition phases. Using the South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook as a guideline, the threshold for potentially significant short-term air quality impacts would involve the grading of 1,309,000 square feet of area and the demolition of 23,214,000 cubic feet of building area. Assuming grading of the whole project site, approximately 43,000 square feet of area would be graded and 85,800 cubic feet of existing structure would be demolished. The amount of grading and demolishing acti vi ties for the proposed proj ect would be considerably less than the threshold of significance established in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Less than significant short-term air quality impacts would be associated with the implementation of the proposed project. While the construction related emissions associated with the proposed project would not exceed the thresholds established by the SCAQMD, the emissions could be a nuisance to other existing land uses in the nearby vicinity of the proj ect site. To minimize short-term construction related air impacts within the project area the following project enhancement measure shall be implemented. Project Enhancement Measure During construction, the contractor would be required to comply with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403 to suppress dust generated by construction operations. To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans and demolition plans for the proposed project shall reflect the following notes: 1. All material excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 2. All clearing during period averaged over smog episodes. and earthwork activities shall cease of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 3. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. 5 31A4~7 4. All material transported offsite shall sufficiently watered or securely covered excessive amounts of dust. either be to prevent 5. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. 6. Equipment engines shall be condition and in proper manufacturer's specifications. maintained in tune according good to 7. To the extent shall be used activities. feasible, gasoline powered equipment for onsite and offsite construction D. Expose Sensitive concentrations? receptors to substantial pollutant Less than Significant Impact The proposed project site is surrounded by residential uses. It is anticipated that less than significant long-term and short- term impacts would be associated with the proposed project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to any substantial concentrations of air quality pollutants. E. Create obj ectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact Implementation of the proposed project would not generate significant long-term operational odors. Construction equipment and operations associated with the proposed project could potentially result in odor impacts. However, the odors would be short-term and would not be considered significant. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (A) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Services? 6 31A-28 8 of 48 (B) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (C) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling hydrological interruption, or other means? (D) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact According to the California Department Fish and Game Natural Diversity Data Base and the City's General plan EIR, there are no sensitive biological resources located on the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any adverse impacts to any onsite sensitive biological resources. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES (A) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? No Impact According to the National Register of Historical Structures and the City of Santa Ana Local List of Historical Properties, there are no historical structures on the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to any historic resource. (B) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? (C) Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique paleontogical resource or site? (D) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of for.mal cemeteries. No Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no known or recorded archaeological or paleontological resources on or within the vicinity of the project site. 7 31A-29 9 of 48 Additionally, the project site is currently improved. The probability for the discovery of unknown cultural resources would be low. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts to unknown cultural resources that could be present on the project site. VI. GEOLOGY/SOILS A-I. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? No Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the project site is not located within a current Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, the potential for surface rupture due to faulting occurring beneath the site during the design life of the proposed project is considered low. A-2. Strong seismic Ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact The project site is situated within a highly active seismic region of southern California. A total of 38 active faults have been identified within an approximate 60-mile radius of the project site. The Newport/Inglewood Fault located approximately 13 miles south from the City of Santa Ana is considered to be one of the most dominant faults in regard to potential seismic shaking impacts. The project site could potentially be subject to a maximum credible horizontal ground acceleration of 0.30g from a magnitude 6.9 earthquake along the Newport/Inglewood fault zone. A seismic event of this scale could potentially result in significant damage to the proposed project. However, the risks at the project site are similar to many other areas in Southern California region. To minimize potential seismic shaking impacts, the proposed project would be subject Seismic Shaking Standards of the Uniform Building Code. Compliance with the Uniform Building Code would reduce potential impacts associated with seismic activity to a level that would be less than significant. A-3. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact 8 31A-30 10 of 48 Soil liquefaction occurs when loose soil deposits below the water table are subject to large ground accelerations generated from seismic events. According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element ErR, the project site is located in an area that is characterized with low liquefaction hazard potential. To minimize potential liquefaction impacts, the proposed project would be subject Seismic Shaking Standards of the Uniform Building Code. Compliance with the Uniform Building Code would reduce potential liquefaction impacts to a level considered less than significant. A-4. Landslides No Impact The project site is flat without any topographical relief. According to the City's General Plan, there are no landslide planes on the project site. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in adverse impacts in regards to landslides. B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Erosion refers to the removal surfaces by water or wind. intensified with an increase in channels and by the removal of soil exposed. of soil from exposed bedrock The effects of erosion are slope, the narrowing of runoff groundcover, which leaves the Construction operations for the proposed proj ect would require the excavation of onsite soils. The uncovered soils on the project site could potentially result in erosion and sedimentation impacts to onsite and offsite drainage facilities. This potential impact could increase during periods of rain. To reduce potential erosion impacts to a level considered less than significant, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure · Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall submit for review and approval a surface drainage/grading plan/erosion control plan, prepared by a 9 31A-31 11 of 48 registered Civil Engineer, showing the direction and means of flow to adjacent streets. The plan is to include existing and proposed elevations at and adj acent to all property lines. Drainage routed to the street must be directed beneath the sidewalk and through the curb. c. Would the project result in the loss of a unique geological feature? No Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the project site does not contain any unique geologic features. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in adverse impacts to any unique geologic feature. D. In the project located on strata or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact According the City's General Plan Land Use Element ErR, the project site is located on Chino Silty Clay Loam Soils that have moderate shrink/swell potential, high corrosion potential to uncoated steel and low corrosion potential to concrete. The soil conditions on the project site would not provide a constraint that would prevent the development of the proposed project. As part of the City's development review process a geotechnical study would be prepared to identify the necessary improvements to ensure the long-term goetechnical stability of the project site. E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? No Impact The project site is an improved building site with an improved sewer system. In terms of geological stability, the project site would be able to support the expansion of additional sewer facilities if needed. 10 31A-32 12 of 48 VII. HAZARDS/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS A. Create a significant hazard to the environment through the routine transport, of hazardous materials? public use or or the disposal B. Emit hazardous emissions or hazardous materials, substance mile of an existing or proposed handle hazardous or acutely or waste within one-quarter school? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated The proposed project involves the construction and operation of a church facility and an associated offsite parking area. The long-term operation of the proposed project would not involve the routine transportation, disposal or emission of hazardous materials or waste. However, the long-term operation and construction operations of the proposed project could involve the handling and storage of incidental amounts of hazardous substances such paints, solvents and other types of cleaners. The project would be required to comply with local, state and federal requirements regarding the handling and storage of hazardous materials. Compliance with local, state and federal regulations and laws regarding the handling, storage and transportation of hazardous materials would reduce potential long-term hazardous material hazard impacts to a level considered less than significant. Construction operations for the proposed project would involve the demolition of four existing structure on the project site. Due to the age of the building, there is concern that the structure could contain asbestos containing building materials. To determine the presence of asbestos containing building materials, an asbestos survey was prepared for the structures proposed for demolition. The survey was prepared by, Common Sense Safety, Inc in March of 2003. The survey is available for review at the City of Santa Ana Planning Department. During the survey each structure was visually inspected to identify the location, type and quantity of suspected asbestos containing materials. Samples were taken from each structure and analyzed. The analysis determined that asbestos containing building materials were present in two of the buildings on the project site. Without adequate remediation, proposed demolishing activities to these buildings could release asbestos particles 11 31A-33 13 of 48 into the air, potential resulting in health hazards to workers. To avoid potential impacts associated with the release of asbestos containing building materials, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure . Prior to the issuance of demolition permits, a remediation plan shall be prepared and approved by the City of Santa Ana to remove asbestos containing building materials. . The removal of asbestos containing building materials shall be conducted by a state licensed contractor. C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of hazardous material sites compiles pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact According to the City's Fire Department, the project site is not identified as a hazardous material site. Implementation of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. D. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles where a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact According to the Orange County Airport Environs Land Use Plan, the project site is not located within an accident potential zone, clear zone or FAA Notification Area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any airport related safety hazards to people residing in or working within the project area. VIII. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? 12 31A-34 14 of 48 E. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? I. Result in an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving waters? N. Tributary to an already impaired water body, as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list. If so, can it result in an increase in any pollutant of which the body is already impaired? R. Cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated The City of Santa Ana is included within four watersheds, San Diego Creek, Santa Ana River, Talbert and Westminster. Each of these watershed areas are under the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and subject to the objectives, water quality standards and Best Management Practice requirements established in the Santa Ana River Basin Plan and Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan. The City of Santa Ana does not contain any impaired water bodies, as defined by Section 303 of the Clean Water Act. However, the City does contain several drainage facilities that convey surface water runoff into bodies of water that are classified as impaired. The long-term operation of the proposed project would not involve routine waste discharges that would be in conflict with water quality standards established by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. The primary source of potential adverse water quality impacts associated with the operation of the proposed project would be from nuisance flows. Nuisance flows is defined as runoff that occurs during periods that are not usually associated with rainfall, and are most commonly produced from landscaping irrigation, leaking pipes, and water used to wash off surfaces tributary to the street. Since nuisance flows usually originates in the street, they commonly contain many common pollutants found in streets such as oil and grease and sediment. Additionally, surface water runoff generated from the project site during construction operations could be degraded potentially resulting in adverse water quality impacts to downstream receiving waters. To reduce potential water quality impacts to a level considered less than significant the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 13 31A-35 15 of 48 Mitigation Measures . Prior to the issuance of grctding permits, the project applicant shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General construction Activity Storm Water Permit, which includes a copy of the project permit number and two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. . Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare an NPDES post-construction storm water management plan per Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) that includes all structural and non-structural Best Management Practices for the project. a. Submit and plan to Practices. have include approved a surface all structural drainage/utility Best management b. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that includes a description of all-applicable Structural and Non-Structural Best Management Practices, which would apply to this project. B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. Q. Have a potentially significant adverse impact on groundwater quality? No Impact The City of Santa Ana receives 66% of its water from underground water supplies. The underground water basin in the City ranges from -50 feet to +40 feet, above sea level. Construction operations for the proposed project would not involve dewatering operations. The long-term operation of the proposed project would not have any impact on groundwater supplies. Additionally, the proposed project would not interfere with ground water recharge because the site is not located in an area that is known to recharge the ground water system. c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of 14 31A-36 16 of 48 stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on or off-site? D. Create or contribute runoff water which, would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? L. Result in increased impervious surfaces and associated runoff? M. Create a significant adverse environmental impact to drainage patterns due to changes in runoff flow rates or volumes. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated The City of Santa Ana has a Master Plan of Drainage to guide the construction of drainage facilities in the City. The existing drainage facilities in the City include a series of underground storm drain systems, open storm drain systems, catch basins and natural drainages. A significant drainage impact can occur when existing rates of surface water runoff are increased and existing drainage facilities are unable to accommodate the additional rates of runoff. Existing rates of surface water runoff can increase through the introduction of additional amounts of impervious surfaces, or through changes to existing drainage patterns. The project site and surrounding project area is currently improved with drainage facilities. Site preparation associated with the proposed project could alter the direction of existing drainage patterns on the project site. Changes to current drainage patterns could potentially impact the capacity of existing drainage facilities within the project area. To ensure that existing drainage facilities are not adversely impacted by the proposed project, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure . Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare a surface water runoff study to show existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility. 15 31A-37 1 7 of 48 F. Place housing within a lOO-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? G. Place within a lOO-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of failure of a levee or dam. No Impact According to the Flood Rate Insurance Map 0602320257H the project site is not located within a IOO-Year Flood Zone and would not be subject to IOO-year flood impacts. J. Result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction. K. Could the proposed project result in increased erosion downstream? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Construction operations for the proposed proj ect would require the excavation of onsite soils. The uncovered soils on the project site could potentially result in erosion and sedimentation impacts to onsite and offsite drainage facilities. This potential impact could increase during periods of rain. Through the implementation of mitigation measures identified in Section VIII of this initial study potential erosion impacts would be reduced to a level considered less than significant. O. Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? If so, can it exacerbate already existing sensitive conditions? P. Have a potentially significant environmental impact or surface water quality to either marine, fresh or wetland waters? S. Impact aquatic, wetland or riparian habitat? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no sensitive marine waters, fresh waters or wetlands in the 16 31A-38 18 of 48 City. However, the City does contain several local drainage systems that convey drainage flows to sensitive marine resources. Pollutants conveyed through these drainage systems could adversely impact sensitive marine resources. Construction operations and the long term operation of the proposed project could discharge pollutants into local drainage systems that could potentially convey water quality pollutants to sensitive marine resources downstream of the project site. Through the implementation of mitigation measures identified in Section VIII of this initial study potential water quality impacts to downstream marine resources would be reduced to a level considered less than significant. IX. LAND USE/PLANNING A. Physically divide an established community? No Impact The proposed project is conditionally permitted within residential areas. To meet the parking requirements for the project, the applicant is requesting approval of a Minor Exception to allow for an offsite parking area across the street from the proposed church. No adverse land use impacts would be associated with the proposed church. A combination of landscaping and perimeter walls would be provided for the proposed offsite parking to minimize land use impacts to nearby residential areas. B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and conditionally allowed under the City's Zoning Ordinance. Additionally, the proposed project is requesting approval of Minor Exception to allow for offsite parking. With approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Exception the proposed project would not be conflict with relevant planning programs in the City. C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community plan? 17 31A-39 19 of 48 No Impact According to the City's General Plan, the project site is not included within any habitat conservation plan or any natural community conservation plan. X. MINERAL RESOURCES A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact According to the City's General Plan there are no areas designated as Significant Mineral Aggregate Resource Areas. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of any regionally or locally important mineral resource. XI. NOISE A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project involves the construction of a church and parish hall and offsite parking area. The project site is surrounded by residential uses. The proposed project would not significantly increase traffic volumes and associated mobile source noise impacts in the project area. Additionally, the project includes a request to construct a 6-foot high block wall around the parking area of the church and along the offsite parking area. The proposed block wall would reduce potential noise impacts generated from the proposed parking area. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly increase ambient noise levels or expose people to noise levels In excess of City standards. B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? 18 31 ~o-o149 No Impact The proposed project would only require conventional construction equipment and building practices. No significant ground borne noise impacts or ground borne vibration impacts would be associated with the proposed project. D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without project. Less Than Significant Impact Construction activities and construction equipment staging operations associated with the proposed project could potentially result in noise impacts to nearby residential land uses. Construction operations for the proposed project would be required to comply with City's Noise Ordinance. Construction hours would be limited to 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 8 PM Saturday, and not permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. Compliance with the noise ordinance would reduce short-term construction noise impacts to a level considered less than significant. To ensure compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance, the following project enhancement shall be implemented. Project Enhancement Measure . Grading, Demolition and Building Plans for the proposed project shall specify that construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 8 PM Saturday, and not permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact According to the Orange County Airport Environs Land Use Plan, the proposed project site is not located within an area that is subject to high levels of aircraft noise. 19 31A-41 21 of 48 XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly through extension of roads or other infrastructure. B. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact Direct growth inducing impacts are generally associated with aspects of a proj ect that could remove obstacles to population growth or other growth such as a major expansion of a wastewater treatment plant or upgrading of regional master plan infrastructure and facilities that would facilitate new development. Indirect or secondary growth inducing impacts consists of growth inducted in the region by the demand for additional housing as a result of emploYment generation, and demand for goods and services associated with population increases caused by, or attracted to, an area as a result of new development. The proposed project involves the construction of a church facility and associated offsite parking area. Implementation of the proposed project would not induce additional population growth into the area. Nor would it displace any existing households or housing. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection: Less than Significant Impact The Santa Ana Fire Department would provide fire protection and emergency medical services for the proposed project. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly increase the demands for fire protection services. The fire department has indicated that under existing levels of manpower and equipment, they would have the ability to provide adequate fire protection services. Additionally, through the City's development review process, the fire department has identified a number of requirements to ensure that adequate fire protection services would be available. Implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to fire protection services. 20 31~-o14~ Police Protection: Less than Significant Impact The Santa Ana Police Department would provide police protection services for the proposed project. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly increase the demand for police protection services. The police department has indicated that under existing levels of manpower and equipment, they would have the ability to provide adequate police protection services. Through the City's development review process, the police department has identified a number of requirements to ensure that adequate police protection services would be available. Implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to police protection services. Schools: Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project is located within the boundaries of the Santa Ana Unified School District. Presently, existing schools within the District are operating at capacity. Implementation of the proposed project would not generate a need for new school facilities. However, to help mitigate cumulative impacts that could be associated with new development, the proposed project would be subject to school impact fees. The payment of impact fees to the District would reduce cumulative impacts to school services to a level below significant Parks, Other Public Facilities: No Impact The proposed project involves the construction of a church facility. Implementation of the proposed project would not increase demands for new park facilities, other public facilities or any adverse impacts on existing park facilities. XIV. RECREATION A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. 21 31A-43 23 of 48 No Impact The proposed project involves the construction of a church facility. Implementation of the proposed project would not increase the demands for new recreation facilities or have an adverse impact on any existing recreational services or facilities. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC A. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the Street system? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project would replace and existing church. According to the City's Public Works Department, there would be no significant increase in vehicle trips. Additionally, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and the traffic projections in the Circulation Element. Existing levels of service of roadways segments and intersections within the project area would not decrease. B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less Than Significant Impact The Orange County Congestion Management Program requires a traffic impact analysis to be prepared for developments that generate 2,400 or more vehicle trips per day and that would directly impact the CMP Highway System. The proposed project would not exceed the daily vehicle trip criteria established by the Orange County Management Program and therefore would have less than a significant impact on the Orange County Congestion Management Program. C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact The proposed project involves the construction of a church and parish hall. Implementation of the proposed project would not 22 31A-44 24 of 48 result in any changes to air traffic patterns. Nor would the proposed project result in any substantial safety risks related to aircraft traffic. D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature No Impact As part of the propose project, vehicle access and pedestrian access improvements would occur. Implementation of the proposed project would not increase vehicle or pedestrian hazards. E. Result in inadequate emergency access J..'"j. No Impact As part of the City's development review process, the Fire Department has reviewed the proposed project for potential impacts in regards to emergency access. The Fire Department has indicated that adequate emergency access would be provided. F Result In Inadequate parking capacity Less Than Significant Impact Per the City's Zoning Code, a total of 74 parking spaces are required. A total of 51 of the parking spaces would be on-site with 28 spaces on Site 1 and the remaining 23 spaces provided offsite on the adjacent Site 2. No adverse parking impacts would be associated with the proposed project. (G) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation No Impact The proposed project would not be in conflict with any adopted policies regarding alternative modes of transportation. Public transportation facilities would still be available in the project area to provide public access to the project site. XVI. UTILITIES A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 23 31A-45 25 of 48 B. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? E. Result in the determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments. Less Than Significant Impact The City of Santa Ana and/or the Orange County Sanitation District would provide wastewater service to the project site. The proposed project would be subject to appropriate sewer connection fees with the City of Santa Ana and the Orange County Sanitation District. The treatment of wastewater would be provided at Reclamation Plant 1 in the City of Fountain Valley. The proposed project would not significantly increase the demand for additional wastewater facilities. Additionally, the proposed project would not require an increase in wastewater treatment facilities. Nor would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant effects. Less Than Significant Impact Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly increase the amount of surface water runoff generated from the project site. The project would not require the construction of new drainage facilities that could cause significant impacts to the environment. D. Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant Impact The City of Santa Ana would provide water service to the project site. The proposed project would be consistent with the water demand projections in the City's Urban Water Management Plan and would not significantly increase demands for water service over current levels of demand. Through the City's development review 24 31A-46 26 of 48 process, the Public Works Department has indicated that the City would have the ability to provide adequate water service to the project site. The proposed project would be subject to appropriate water connection fees. No adverse impacts in regards to the provision of adequate water service would be associated with the proposed project. F. Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? G. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact Great Western Reclamation would provide solid waste disposal service for the proposed project. The proposed project would not significantly increase the demand for solid waste disposal. Additionally, the City has adopted a Source Reduction and Recycling Element, which, establishes programs to reduce the City's overall demand for solid waste disposal. No significant adverse impacts would be associated with providing solid waste disposal service for the proposed project. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. No Impact Implementation of the proposed project would not substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, in that no fish or wildlife populations are known to exist on the project site. The operation or construction of the proposed project would not degrade the overall quality of the environment. B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? 25 31A-47 27 of 48 Less Than Significant Impact Implementation of the proposed project would not result in cumulative impacts to the environment. The proposed project's incremental contribution would not be considered cumulatively considerable because the proposed project would comply with the mitigation measures in the CEQA documentation, and applicable City and State requirements during the construction and operation of the proposed project which would avoid any significant cumulative impacts within the project area. C. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project involves the construction of a church facility. Mitigation measures have been required for the proposed project to insure that implementation of the project would not have any direct or indirect adverse impacts on human beings. XVIII DETERMINATION Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented in the above environmental evaluation and cited references, I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. XVIV REFERENCES City of Santa Ana General Plan, September 1982 Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Land Use Element, August 1997 City of Santa Ana Zoning Ordinance, December 1998 South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993 California Environmental Quality Act Statues and Guidelines, January 1999 26 31A-48 28 of 48 California Department of Conservation Farmland mapping and Monitoring Program California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity data Base. National Register of Historical Properties City of Santa Ana Local List of Historical Properties Limited Asbestos Survey for Starlight Baptist Church, Common Sense Safety, Inc., March 2003 Site Visit by Dan Bott Environmental Coordinator, January 2005 Orange County Airport Environs Land Use Plan City of Santa Ana Master Plan of Drainage City of Santa Ana urban Water Management Plan Flood Rate Insurance Map 0602320257H XX. PREPARERS Dan Bott, City of Santa Ana Environmental Coordinator 27 31A-49 29 of 48 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance PLANNING DIVISION I. Project Title: Starlight Church II. Project Numbers: ER 2002-446 III. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Santa Ana Planning Division P.O. Box 1988 (M-20) Santa Ana, CA 92702 IV. Environmental Coordinator and Phone Number: Dan Bott (714) 667-2719 V. Project Location: 1201 West Second Street Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that: A. 0 The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. B.9< Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. c.D The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. D.D Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR (EIR No. -) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. E. 0 Pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEOA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. - ) has been prepared earlier and only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the previous EIR adequate and these changes do not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the environment. An ADDENDUM to the EIR shall be prepared. F. 0 Pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEOA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. - ) has been prepared earlier; however, subsequent proposed changes in the project and/or new information of substantial importance will cause one or more Signifi~eViOUSIY discussed. A SUBSEQUENT EIR shall be prepared. Y6m.~ S~' nature \ ~ \ k\ ~ \J Pri d Name January 24. 2005 Date dblEnv Form CEQA Chklst 31A-50 30 of 48 Page 1 of 1 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Plan Designation: Description of Project: Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Zoning: Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by that project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 0 Aesthetics 0 Historic Demolition 0 Agricultural Resources 0 Historic Project Review 0 Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Biological Resources 0 Population / Housing 0 Cultural Resources 0 Public Services 0 Geology / Soils 0 Recreation 0 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 0 Transportation / Traffic 0 Hydrology / Water Quality 0 Utilities / Service Systems 0 Mineral Resources 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance 0 General Plan Amendment dblEnv Form CEOA Chklst Page 1 of 1 3'fjt~~ENT A 31 of 48 an,A Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: I. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). II. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. III. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. IV. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact I. Aesthetics - Would the project: A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 % B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited 0 0 0 to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a state highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character W' or quality of the site and its surroundings? 0 0 0 D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views ~ in the area? 0 0 0 dblEnv Form CEOA Chklst Page 1 of 12 3'i~9~~NT B 32 of 48 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact II. Agricultural Resources - In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agricultural farmland. Would the project: A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program in the California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation, maintains detailed maps of these and other categories of farmland.) o o o o o o o o o 9( ~ ( III. Air Quality - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? B. Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or proposed air quality violation? C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emission which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? D. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? db\Env Form CEQA Chklst 3~TA'lMNT B 33 of 48 o o o o o o o o o ~ ~ ~ Jt\f o o o Page 2 of 12 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. Biological Resources - Would the project: A. Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling hydrological interruption, or other means? D. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? V. Cultural Resources - Would the project: A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to define Section 15064.5? C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique paleontogical resource or site? dblEnv Form CEOA Chklst 3'1~~~'ENT B 34 of 48 Potentially Significant Impact o o o o o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated o o o o o o o o Less Than Significant Impact t4 o o o o o o o No Impact o ~ ~ ~ M >}{ ft( frf: Page 3 of 12 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact D. Disturb any human remains, including those 0 0 0 ~ interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. Geology and Soils - Would the project: A. Expose people or structures to potential substantial 0 0 0 0 adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of an known earthquake fault, as 0 0 0 9i delineated on the most recent on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 ~ 0 3. Seismic-related ground failure, including 0 0 M 0 liquefaction? 4. Landslides? 0 0 0 ~ B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion 0 p{ 0 0 or the loss of topsoil? C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique 0 0 0 ~ geologic feature? D. Is the project located on strata or soil that is 0 0 ~ 0 unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of 0 0 0 Jk[ wastewater, is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? db\Env Form CEQA Chklst Page 4 of 12 ~,TAS.fHNT B ~ ~li~ anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources VII. Hazardous and Hazardous Materials - Would the project: A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substance or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? D. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles where of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality - Would the project: A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (Le., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? dblEnv Form CEQA Chklsl j1T~;9JNT 8 Potentially Significant Impact o o o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated 9i ~ o o ~ o Less Than Significant Impact No Impact o o o o o ~ o ~ o o o JX( Page 5 of 12 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off- site? D. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? E. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? F. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? G. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. I. Result in an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving waters? Consider water quality parameters such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity and other typical storm water pollutants (e.g. heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, sediment, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances, and trash) J. Result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction? K. Could the proposed project result in increased erosion downstream? L. Result in increased impervious surfaces and associated increased runoff? db\Env Form CEQA Chklst :t1%llNT 8 Potentially Significant Impact o o o o o o o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated M ~ P\ o o o ~ ~ Ji( ~ Less Than Significant Impact o o o o D o o o D D No Impact D D o ~ J( ~ D D o D Page 6 of 12 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance M. Create a significant adverse environmental impact to drainage patterns due to changes in runoff flow rates or volumes? N. Tributary to an already impaired water body, as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list: If so, can it result in an increase in any pollutant of which the water body is already impaired? o. Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? If so, can it exacerbate already existing sensitive conditions? P. Have a potentially significant environmental impact on surface water quality to either marine, fresh, or wetland waters? Q. Have a potentially significant adverse impact on groundwater quality? R. Cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? s. Impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian habitat? IX. Land Use and Planning- Would the project: A. Physically divide an established community? B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. Mineral Resources - Would the project: A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Issues & Supporting Information Sources dblEnv Form CECA Chklst 3'1~~~NT B 38 ~4V D D D D D D D D D o Potentially Significant Impact ?t ~ ~ D ~ >( o D D o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation D o D D o D o ~ D o Less Than Significant Impact D o o ~ o o J( o ~ ~ No Impact Page 7 of 12 anf^ Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Incorporated XI. Noise - Would the project result in: A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without project? E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. Population and Housing - Would the project: A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? B. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Issues & Supporting Information Sources dblEnv Form CEQA Chklst $1~S~~NT 8 39 of 48 o o o o o o o o Potentially Significant Impact o o o o o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation P1: o ~ ~ o o o o Less Than Significant Impact o ~ o o ~ w ~ 9Z No Impact Page 8 of 12 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Incorporated XIII. Public Services A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public service: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? XIV. Recreation A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. Transportation I Traffic A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (Le. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion at intersections?) Issues & Supporting Information Sources dblEnv Form CEQA Chklst $1~StWfNT B 40 of 48 o o o o o o o o o Potentially Significant Impact o o o o o o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation o ~ ~ ~ o o o o ~ Less Than Significant Impact o o o o )q D( M cl( o No Impact Page 9 of 12 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? E. Result in inadequate emergency access? F. Result in inadequate parking capacity? G. Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts. bicycle racks)? XVI. Utilities and Service Systems A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? B. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? D. Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed? E. Result in the determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Issues & Supporting Information Sources dblEnv Form CECA Chklst 39'~9S~ENT B 41 of 48 D D D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Impact Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation ~ ~ D D Q( D ~ ~ M Jt( ~ Less Than Significant Impact D D ~ )k o Pi{ o D D D o No Impact Page 10 of 12 anfA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance F. Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's sold waste disposal needs? G. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). C. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? dblEnv Form CEQA Chklst ffjt~~NT B 42 of 48 Incorporated o ~ o o o ~ o o o ~ o o o ~ o o o ~ o o Page 11 of 12 MITIGATION MEASURE During construction, the contractor would be required to comply with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403 to suppress dust generated by construction operations. To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans and demolition plans for the proposed project shall reflect the following notes: All material excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. All clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph averaged STARLIGHT BAPTIST CHURCH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM TIMMING AGENCY Prior to Building/Planning Demolition and Grading Permits 31A-63 43 of 48 COMPLIANCE over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. All material transported offsite shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for 31A-64 44 of 48 onsite and off site construction activities. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall submit for review and approval a surface drainage/grading plan/erosion control plan, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, showing the direction and means of flow to adjacent streets. The plan is to include existing and proposed elevations at and adjacent to all property lines. Drainage routed to the street must be directed beneath the sidewalk and through the curb. Prior to the issuance of demolition permits, a remediation plan shall be prepared and approved by the Prior to Public Works Grading Permit Prior to Building/Planning Demolition Permit 31An65 City of Santa Ana to remove asbestos containing building materials. The applicant shall demonstrate proof that the removal of asbestos containing building materials is conducted by a state licensed contractor. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General construction Activity Storm Water Permit, which includes a copy of the project permit number and two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare an NPDES post- construction Prior to Building/Planning removal of asbestos containing building materials Prior to Public Works Grading Permit Prior to Public Works Grading Permits 31A-66 46 of 48 storm water management plan per Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) that includes all structural and non-structural Best Management Practices for the project. Submit and have approved a surface drainage/utility plan to include all structural Best management Practices. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that includes a description of all-applicable Structural and Non-Structural Best Management Practices, which would apply to this project. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare a surface water runoff study to show existing and proposed Prior to Building Permit Public Works 31A-67 47 of 48 facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility. Grading, Demolition and Building Plans for the proposed project shall specify that construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 8 PM Saturday, and not permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. Prior to Building/Planning Demolition and Grading Permits 31A-68 48 of 48 KO - 03/07/05 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-01 AS CONDITIONED AND MINOR EXCEPTION NO. 2005-01 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW A CHURCH IN THE TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE (R2) ZONING DISTRICT AT 1201 WEST SECOND STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 and Minor Exception No. 2005-01 came before the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana for a duly noticed public hearing on February 28, 2005. B. Applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 to allow a church in the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district at 1201 West Second Street C. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section, churches are permitted in the R2 district with a Conditional Use Permit. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a conditional use permit upon making certain findings. 1. Will the proposed use provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or community? The proposed church facility, as conditioned, will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood and the community by providing religious and educational services that enhance the local community. 2. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity? The proposed church will not be detrimental to the general welfare and safety of the surrounding businesses and residents. The proposed church is in compliance with 31A-69 Resolution No. 2005-07 Page 1 of 5 Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code with respect to parking, setbacks and landscaping. Additionally, mitigation measures have been incorporated to minimize the potential impacts generated from the proposed project. 3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area? The proposed church will provide an additional service to the surrounding commercial and residential uses within the vicinity. The City's zoning code allows the church use in the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district with a conditional use permit. The church facility will provide services that compliment the surrounding residential neighborhood. As conditioned, the use should enhance rather than adversely affect economic development or stability of the area. 4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use. The proposed use will be in compliance with the applicable sections of Chapter 41 of the Municipal Code with an approved conditional use permit for the proposed church facility. Additionally, the proposed church facility will be in compliance with the mitigation measures identified in the Negative Declaration. 5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any specific plan of the City? The proposed church is in an area designated Low Density Residential, seven dwelling units per acre (LR7) in the General Plan. The use is consistent with the General Plan and zoning district that allows a church facility. D. Applicant has requested a Minor Exception No. 2005-01 to allow off-site parking on a lot across the street at 1137 West Second Street. E. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638.1 permits a minor exception may be granted for a parking area that is immediately across a street. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a minor exception upon making certain findings. 1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, that the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at 31A-70 Resolution No. 2005-07 Page 2 of 5 minor exception with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this Chapter. There are special circumstances to the subject property. The subject property contains two sites. Site 1 is located on the northwest corner of Second and Baker Streets and Site 2 is located across Baker Street on the northeast corner of Baker and Second Streets. Sufficient parking will be provided on both Site 1 and Site 2 for the proposed church use. Additionally, a covenant is required to be recorded to restrict the use of the parking lot on Site 2 for the church only. 2. That the granting of a minor exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The granting of the minor exception is necessary to develop the property with a parking lot ancillary to the church use across the street so that sufficient parking will be provided for the church. 3. That the granting of a minor exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The granting of the minor exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property because the proposed parking lot complies with all development standards set forth in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including setbacks and landscaping. 4. That the granting of a minor exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The granting of the minor exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City since the proposed parking lot is designed in conformance with the Professional zoning district development standards and General Plan requirements. Section 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the initial study and the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program prepared with respect to this Project. The Planning Commission has, as a result of its consideration and the evidence presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, a mitigation negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program adequately addresses the expected environmental impacts of this Project. On the basis of this review, the 31A-71 Resolution No. 2005-07 Page 3 of 5 Planning Commission finds that there is no evidence from which it can be fairly argued that the Project will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The Planning Commission hereby certifies and approves the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program and directs that the Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of the County of Orange in the manner required by law. Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ("CCR") 9 735.5(c)(1), the Planning Commission has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code 9711.2 and Title XIV, CCR 9 735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project. Section 3. The Planning Commission after conducting the public hearing hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein and Minor Exception No. 2005-01 as conditioned in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes but not is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated February 28, 2005 and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. ADOPTED this 28h day of February, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: De La Torre, Gartner, Leo, Lutz, Mondo, Nalle (6) None (0) Cribb (1) None (0) Glenn Mondo Chairperson 31A-72 Resolution No. 2005-07 Page 4 of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Kylee O. Otto Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Martha Ramirez, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2005-07 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on February 28, 2005. Date: Planning Commission Secretary City of Santa Ana 31A-73 Resolution No. 2005-07 Page 5 of 5 Conditions for Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Commission, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit. A. Plannina Division 1 . The project shall remain in compliance with Site Plan Review DP No. 2002-93. 2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit must be amended. 3. The use of the property is limited to a church and related parish buildings and activities. No thrift shops, food distribution programs, full-time parochial school, nor rehabilitation programming may occur on the premises. 4. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, a covenant to tie the parking lot use at 1137 West Second Street with the church across the street at 1201 West Second Street shall be recorded. 5. The starting and ending times of church services should be spaced at least one hour to minimize the overlap of departing attendees and arriving attendees. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, the landscape plans shall be revised to reflect 24-inch boxed size trees and 5-gallon shrubs for all required plants of this project. 7. After project occupancy, landscaping is to be maintained to include the minimum level of plant materials installed at the time of occupancy. EXHIBIT "A" Pa~e 1 of 3 31A-74 8. Public payphones, if provided, may only be located within buildings or in the interior of the site. Mitigation Measures 9. During construction, the contractor would be required to comply with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403 to suppress dust generated by construction operations. To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans for the proposed project shall reflect the appropriate notes. 10. All materials excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amount of dust. 11. All clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph averaged over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. 12. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. 13. All materials transported off-site shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 14. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. 15. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. 16. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for on- site and off-site construction activities. 17. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval a surface drainage/grading plan/erosion control plan, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, showing the direction and means of flow to adjacent streets. The plan is to include existing and proposed elevations at and adjacent to all property lines. Drainage routed to the street must be directed beneath the sidewalk and through the curb. 18. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, a remediation plan shall be prepared and approved by the City of Santa Ana to remove asbestos containing building materials. 19. The removal of asbestos containing building materials shall be conducted by a state licensed contractor. EXHIBIT "A" Pa~e 2 of 3 31A-75 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit, which includes a copy of the project permit number and two copies of the storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare an NPDES post-construction storm water management plan per Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) that includes all structural and non-structural Best Management Practices. a. Submit and have approved a surface drainage/utility plan that includes all Structural Best Management Practices. b. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management plan that includes a description of all applicable Structural and Non- Structural Best Management Practices, which may apply to this project. 22. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare a surface water runoff study to show existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility. 23. Grading plans and building plans for the proposed project shall note that construction activities on the project site shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays and not permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. B. Police Department 1. All structures and parking lot must conform to the provisions of Chapter 8, Article II Division 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Building Security Ordinance). These code conditions will require that the existing project's lighting, door/window devices and addressing be upgraded to current code standards. Lighting standards cannot be located in required landscape planters. EXHIBIT "A" paqe 3 of 3 31A-76 Conditions for Approval for Minor Exception No. 2005-01 Minor Exception No. 2005-01 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Commission, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this minor exception. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the minor exception. A. Plannina Division 1 . The project shall remain in compliance with Site Plan Review DP No. 2002-93. 2. Any amendment to this minor exception must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit must be amended. 3. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, a covenant to tie the parking lot use at 1137 West Second Street with the church across the street at 1201 West Second Street shall be recorded. 4. The starting and ending times of church services should be spaced at least one hour to minimize the overlap of departing attendees and arriving attendees. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the landscape plans shall be revised to reflect 24-inch boxed size trees and 5-gallon shrubs for all required plants of this project. 6. After project occupancy, landscaping is to be maintained to include the minimum level of plant materials installed at the time of occupancy. Mitigation Measures 7. During construction, the contractor would be required to comply with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403 to suppress dust generated by construction operations. To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans for the proposed project shall reflect the appropriate notes. EXHIBIT "B" Pa~e 1 of 3 31A-77 8. All materials excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amount of dust. 9. All clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph averaged over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. 10. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. 11 . All materials transported off-site shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 12. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. 13. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. 14. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for on- site and off-site construction activities. 15. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval a surface drainage/grading plan/erosion control plan, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, showing the direction and means of flow to adjacent streets. The plan is to include existing and proposed elevations at and adjacent to all property lines. Drainage routed to the street must be directed beneath the sidewalk and through the curb. 16. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, a remediation plan shall be prepared and approved by the City of Santa Ana to remove asbestos containing building materials. 17. The removal of asbestos containing building materials shall be conducted by a state licensed contractor. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit, which includes a copy of the project permit number and two copies of the storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare an NPDES post-construction storm water management plan per Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) that includes all structural and non-structural Best Management Practices. EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 of 3 31A-78 a. Submit and have approved a surface drainage/utility plan that includes all Structural Best Management Practices. b. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management plan that includes a description of all applicable Structural and Non- Structural Best Management Practices, which may apply to this project. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare a surface water runoff study to show existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility. 21. Grading plans and building plans for the proposed project shall note that construction activities on the project site shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays and not permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. B. Police Department 1. All structures and parking lot must conform to the provisions of Chapter 8, Article II Division 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Building Security Ordinance). These code conditions will require that the existing project's lighting, door/window devices and addressing be upgraded to current code standards. Lighting standards cannot be located in required landscape planters. EXHIBIT "B" Page 3 of 3 31A-79 31A-80 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~'ff. ~~~~\ ~~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2005-02 TO DIVIDE ONE PARCEL INTO THREE LOTS AT 4004 WEST MCFADDEN AVENUE - TRONG QUANG NGUYEN, APPLICANT APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For {;/./ ',/--, , ;/, )a, ., /- :,. {/ . ,,// ~..- ,,/~,/.;. - ,.' t,.' t", ./ j ,~,~ t~>_. ----..- - . CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Confirm the Zoning Administrator's action approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 as conditioned. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION Adopted a resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 as conditioned at its February 23, 2005 meeting to allow the subdivision of an existing residential parcel in the Single-Family Residence (R-1) zoning district into three parcels for the construction of two new single-family dwellings at 4004 West McFadden Avenue. The Zoning Administrator made no changes to the recommended conditions of approval outlined in the attached staff report (Exhibit A) . FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. dIi A J/.J; Ste en G. Hardidg Executive Director Planning & Building Agency VC:rb vc\reports\tpm05-02.cc 31 B-1 REQUEST FOR Zoning Administrator Action 1m ~ PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2005 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2005-02 TO DIVIDE ONE PARCEL INTO THREE LOTS AT 4004 WEST MCFADDEN AVENUE APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Set Public Hearing For DENIED o Applicant's Request o Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO Prepared by Verny Carvaj al tJo7 ' ~ 1F ( Planning Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 as conditioned. DISCUSSION Request of Applicant Mr. Trong Quang Nguyen is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 to subdivide a 0.48-acre parcel into three residential lots at 4004 West McFadden Avenue. Property Description The subject site has a General Plan land use designation of Low-Density Residential (LR-7), with a zoning designation of Single-Family Residential (R1). The project site is a 0.48-acre rectangular parcel with frontage along the south side of McFadden Avenue, between Newhope Street and Harbor Boulevard. A single-family dwelling with a detached garage currently occupies the site, which is bounded by a vacant lot to the west, single and multi-family residential to the north, commercial to the east and single-family homes to the south (Exhibits 1 and 2) . Project Description The project entails the subdivision of a 180-foot by 116-foot lot into three residential parcels to facilitate the construction of two new single-family dwellings on Parcels 2 and 3. Upon completion of the project, three single-family residences will be located on three separate lots. EXHIBIT A 31 B-2 Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 February 23, 2005 Page 2 The two new single-family dwellings will be constructed on 6,260 square foot lots and will have a total of four bedrooms and three baths with detached two-car garages (Exhibits 3, 4 and 5) . Analysis of the Issues The proposed subdivision is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Low Density Residential General Plan designation, which include the preservation and stabilization of residential neighborhoods. Each dwelling unit, including the existing residence to remain, will be in full compliance with the standards for Single-Family Residential (R1) development. Further, the project will satisfy both the minimum lot size and street frontage requirements as the new parcels will be at least 6,000 square feet in size and have frontage of at least 50 linear feet. The proposal also meets the setback requirements, with 20 feet provided for the front setback and a minimum of five feet provided for each side yard. There are no physical site constraints that would prevent development, nor are there any outstanding violations found on the subject property. As a standard infill proj ect, the subdivision would not substantially affect the use, development or habitat of the surrounding area. The project is in compliance with the provisions of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Based on the analysis and findings, it is recommended that Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 be approved as conditioned (Exhibits 6 and 7) . CEQA Compliance This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15332. This Class 32 exemption allows in-fill developments on properties of less than five acres that meet applicable General Plan and zoning regulations. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2004-072 will be filed for this project. ~. . ~A--'" /7 Verny Carvajal Associate Planner ~. Vincent Frego 0, Senior Planne' VC:JM vc\reports\tpm05-02.za 31 B-3 ~Olf:;I='?-'~ ~ '-l("'~:: ~ i~~--____~~r'\\;-----~~-=--=--=-~~~:~Bbd R2'_f ~tt~~ " '.:, :,A::', J<~, ': R2- 'J R1 Rl~ ',~ h~O-:;~~-~J-r~~:c-_-_-;;1 · I SP- R2 R2 tR,20 R2 R2~, R2 R1-PRD I .. II II II II A II~~~~W. i - G175 L. ______~~:_::~~---::--//~~~ SP-2 2 __ ~ ~ [0: C2 f~T ~.~;; ~2 - - :;1 _ __~ SP-2.-:P-2 S'P-'7 C2 C2 . _1.. --'- _..1-- ~-r'- ,- - - FIRSTST -~ I SP-2 I '';fll'' "'" C5 \ \ "" C5 iC2~ C2 ; " ~) :b, ~~ ""! 0 SP-2 1"~~"f~:t~J_:r~ ,; R2:~~/'IIw,: l\~.L;\ _jfL-'M Ml ~ SO-32 'R2~:i:: :: :;, ! - ~c~~~'>~Si:.4~'--~---~~ ,','::. ~% J \'~ R2~'ro< M1 ~ I I I, ': ': ~ ~ I:~ 1,_--- ): ''--- Rl .J Rl C2 ~ ~ '" :: :: : I :. SP- R2 ~ L ELSU, U \ = = = = = = =.-' " / .~ 0 ~"'_JL__J'_J." 2 uR2 I,,, / ~ 't\ ~ ~D-34 ------- 'i:.---Mf--':- P'NEST , ,-=--=--=--:-//~, / Rl ...J" "'" L~R2t!PB-0-:: '0=======. ~ R2 ~ R2 ~ I R21r' U / o 'R3 '-II "-,, ,"L '. R2 . ~ L__~<" 0 'r-\ R2 ' ", '0=======. Il' "--'''', \) , f] I ~~_JI ~l___", I , S 2 I<'J 1\\\ I ____!' , 1 \ L - - - - - - -. P- L....,." ~ '-', \ \ \) '/ I =E =i:T~=~~ :~ J~ ,r-~r-~:-':-:r ,r 'I ! ~ R2 R2 8 L1'~ /~ ~ .mcm;kM ~-=--=-~~-=--=-~:: :: :: :: :: :::: '" CAMU T. R2 R2! ~iq R2 I A111 I Il_Jl_.Jl_.Jl_.Jl_.Jl_.J1 i.. 310"- ~ .... R2 ~-=--=--=, ~-=--=--=, ,r-,r-,r-, r-,r-,r-'I SP- R2 ~ R2 Of 1 I' " I ,I II " ,I " ,I " 2 --' I , '.----' POSEY'T, , Al,", '=--_-=-- -=== ,I " " ,I " ,I 'I <D ""_ A1 ~~ ~ !J === ll~ 470'~ I ' r I l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~.J a: I CHAeA^lINF AVt;' I .... 698'--' R2 ~ ~ 1 ........:~~..... Il ..J -330 300'---1 0 ~ WATlUNSWAY A]~~~~~ ~:~/;.:-,,~,,~ I' i': /' 1- '"' ~ SP-2 0 CI) R2 R2 ~'f '~, }J \,'=--=--- R2 r~ R1~R1 \ I ~:lMS~ A1 ^' (LRl AMfllONAV ~ ~ I ..........-..... JI 1 ::s R : 152 \, "')( I '" I -- MC FADDE ~Ol r--- \ _",,-i,~_~"''' I ll. ' I r--.... "'-JJ Rl i H~;V~~ Rl~~STEROAPI. SP2 PROJECT l~ SP-2 '~~~~l( : w~ & ~ - SITE :;;J~N/fV i Rl ',Rl Rl Rl FL v 1 - ~ m4.2 R1 Rl R1 , ~'-, z Rl ~:;; :;; FL JDi rn ~ R1 R DR" Rl .1 '"' ~ ~ ~ ~OBERTS \ ~ Rl - a Rl ~ Rl ~ Rl ~ Rl ~ Rl '~" '";,' - ~o:..". ~ I-~'lr=,' ~ R1. Rl R1 SP-2 ~ SP-2 RY Al Rl I GENT?:fA>>-- ~"'1R~d ~ Rl I' I~ ,,~l 'i II ~ I "" '"' ~ Rl Rl I h, II :1 !..! I ~ ~ ~ ~ A llzt A : ~~ I ~ . \ Rl "''''' ~ j#J R:RC'I~~ 1 R1 : GBB ;EllieAV ~ ~ r--- I ~ 1------"" o CAMillE 5T. -.Al ~ : Rz\~ -~~ j = Rl Rl J~ II A 1" = 1000 FEET P LAN Rl o Rl Rl Rl Rl f-' Cf) W Q. o ~ !!] '-' '-- '-- z -- B R" >FRF" AV SUZ, C'A ~ Rl I r I , nr-k iI · ~!:2 R1B Rl r- Al -B C-SM Cl Cl-MD C2 C3 C3-A C4 C5 GENERAL AGRICULTURAL PARKING MODIFICATION COMMERCIAL SOUTH MAIN COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL COMM. COMMERCIAUMUSEUM DISTRICT GENERAL COMMERCIAL CENTRAL BUSINESS CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST VILLAGE PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL CR GC M1 M2 MO o P PCD PRO COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT CENTER LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL MILITARY OPERATIONS OPEN SPACE PROFESSIONAL PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Rl R2 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO FAM'LY RES,DENCE MULTIPLE DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBURBAN APARTMENTS RESIDENTIAL ESTATE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC PLAN R4 RE SD SP PM 05-2 TRONG QUANG NGUYEN 4004 WEST Me FADDEN AVENUE A #{' - = 500 FEET N N G A N D B U L EXHIBIT 1 318-4 D N G A G ENe Y -J ~ <( W i:: -J <: W <( a: f::: Cl as Ci) ~ 9 lJ.J en ex: ffl CON DOS -J ).. ~ ex: )..-J ~ -J <: lJ.J -J<( ~ ~i:: W': ~ Q.. ..... W':~ 11: Q.. <: Z 0 lJ.J Cl -J Z -J J:: l) i::Ci) ~ ~ <: W ~ Cf) -JlJ.J ~ex: Ci) C Cf) MC FADDEN AVENUE SAN T A N A SINGLE FA MIL Y RESIDENTIAL R SID NT I L S 0 p P G WISTERIA PLACE i-= C E N T E R en ex: SIN LE FAMIL RESIDE T1AL ).. a: -J ~ ~ 11: lJ.J en -J ~ <: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Cii ~ ~--~ PM 05-2 TRONG QUANG NGUYEN 4004 WEST Me FADDEN AVENUE A c9{' P LAN N N G AND B U L D N G AGE N C Y EXHIBIT 2 318-5 I I I '.lVl ~3f1 38 I I I I I I I I :~ ~'~C-h-.g-{ I ~ I I :i : ,I' .<~\' ' __ "',. '-t:"'l" ,',.,., ~' , ,,," ,q '.''J" I~ I --- ,__--'51-"" ..,' ~ (' r' 1\ " 'J '" . _ ' ..,';' ~,-'- - -:- - - -"'--- I. II I,. <J " ,~ .' 2- ~ ~ <J' " !1 ~ <:5 If;) ~I ~--- W ~ Ul I ::::) I ~I ~I '=! I I~ : ~I ~I ~ I~ Z I ~ ~::e~ IW 'lVlH3Ni~ IlS I .- I~-" iLf I 01 :El I I I I I I 1- _ _ _ I I I ~ :lVl"3M7X31 ~ f ~ - - ~ I I I I I I - -UJ- . ~- 1\ (:) T'" ----- " ~ I : T'" t- .. m I If) W ItO -' I <( () I (/) ! .Zv 'aA'l8: llOIDIVH (~rStr-O~~ WW rStSiI' ill) " 'T:l ~ E--< ~ ~6 ~ 'JJ U ~ ~ ~vS .O'l ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 0 rJ5 Eo< :::: C';J ~ ~ t, 'l In ,.., ..J ~ ,\7 In '" ~ ~ ~ 0 [/) Eo< ~ C';J ~ ~' Eo< '-"', ~ ~ ~ ~6 ~ ifJ U V ~ ~ ~..o -'l ..J ~ " --_..:..- ~1e1T3 "'-- -v - - " .017. ON -=-- ~9~~- - - - -- ,GV /"--., \0 '<;j- ~ I ;r {2 If) ~ 2 , <J ..... (() ! q-' \.n "'T \~ '<J "(), , . 'V 0 .-.. d en 0) ~ ~ [/) ::> ;r 0 If) tIj ~ u 0 ~ ',r, If) Eo< N {fl (") x . OJ ~ ex:> Z /".... ~ ~ I D I"- ~ ~ ti)- N '\j"' t- V) 'T DC. \--- ---/ '<J ~ ~ ~ U ,.-( E--< ~ ~6 ~ ifJ U N ~ ~ ~~ /~.I ..-' pi I ! :.;.~!>1~ ! J ' t ~I I I ~ I' I I ! . .' '1"":~H~O; _., . I t..P,.,..O'i,.......... "J:~~l)'lJj.Jtl, \"-"""I,';C:;':.., 'l'!'" P..,.... 1" ~'_.t l",,,-z! .,<>p-,-'" ,~~o~--'r~_--_ _ ,;7t6"1--;8Zr.......,......%PPTP~. " ~t tl ,. T"-'"-''' ......, ......,,,............"". · "t; I' ft- 1 ~ I.il! t;l~ ~t~-1;~ ii! I !,~' ..; . . , I ./ 0 ~ ~~ . 11'5'ti~';>i?V1"ii. , .y.., ! Cr -....\.;,,; ! i~tt ~t.e;P7.J.$Ixa.~'-.. i "'1 I ~(jh."'f..r~ . '!( m 0 \ -~, . ~ '___ _-'>r'" r)., ':11 S ~ .L^ .",..",' Jr' --: ,,~.>f,I --"tor: ~"'~ ~~ ~ ~"-} ;i, 'Jitlll ~." if; j ~",~:<i *~ J ~:;;:_ .Il ;...: ""'i~~ .~ ..' ~! ~'? l-\Li I J--il.-l.--l"d, ,.---.- L,C,. _'_~"'.;".,.,;<l j I "..: .)f:~'UO,7f,o.;. ;;J. . . . i'''-c'p r ....." ..:?1'V'M;;t~-=!...f1f? <1~J!d~.._ -+- ~; -""''(Im. .~..,1:>i"ii(f'.L'~, ~,.\. ""'+'1~1 ~ -?Nc:i7 ,/ """I.... 'l*' il of"', ~ rS: ~~...~, p . ~(,c . : 'I! ~" ~~\....~ '\ :t:. ,j ,; ~ .~ .' ~h . ~.. ~~h '7;,?- j '" , IJJ ~~ .~;>~ ~.~~.~ Z\ ~ ._~ i ~l' ~.; i t'!.., : {{j~~~\ -4, ~- ~.~~ ~ .,,~ I .,. '.' . ~ ~ " ..., ;::: ~~j ~.j ~u_.~~ . .~_ ;'~1 ~it~~'> '.. .., ~.. ~ 7. I ~ .. 1. ,:;0; 'r ..-:-::---- 0~ig.tl'l'<X'~:S'.::t. "-11'\>1 . :2.. ~~~~. ~' -':.' ~,',S,> '.J ,.. . 'Lr, _",'Ij_~h.~':.. . l~:' -- - - ""'tj "-,, ~ I ~Sl '.-.l~l~.:..... ..~. .'.. ., ~..' . -'- .'''- '-~., ";-. ' 'l:->. . .... .. ....... 'ff.............. ~~.. ..:"!J:!J>'2~ ..Lf! ,C;; ~~{.~<-";>",-:l. ~' ~ ,I . I .. Is:; ,II'PH ,.."......... .. ...... _..._--~... ---- j/< "':ll\ ~l.....r..:O.:iJ.. >~.. "-:>k=.:' ..<_ ' ~"'l ~.! .~'S. ~ j' u-~.... ". ...... : :, t['.?-\ W'} ,<.( -!!o4ii . -s:i 2..! I \-!,<,52.1-- ft -'" '.' j -,,--y: .! ...:i ~~; ~1 '1', 1';';( . " '<1,'>t~!:! ~~". ."'\=.~.'.. l .....-4.{....-:.'~. '. . ,:~...i : '.:(\:o:.~ "-'-" "-=3 ~ . " j . i '~~.'.-"'1..,. ~ ll,,,:r'~ .!..i 1~....~;,.1 ; : ;.1 L~'\..I""'" ~...u ,<" I ...i-......-4;:.L..' rk~ t<~,:" I ~~J ~~ I ~.. ;>,.: ........-.. ....~::~:~..:....._.... ~l I ,-' \1' . ~: ". );vr~wi1fri:t____ ,~,...ff.".' I I; ~ ~ 1< i ?f07~0f'--- 'J I r:l. .., ......lC -----~----.-;; ,..- , t ~ ~';>NaJ1 NOj;i! .J.Ft"";"~1v' ! I I - i~ -l?hjz,.iii~T......._._..-_......--..-:1-1.;iY\:;~~ i+hTL<L~i~....-----""T I i a: $.;" i i i '!.01" . ..... . ..... !. ..' r-"'1 ~i 0.:: ~ ..........,.............."",...'1..,.".. . .. ..1.. . .... .' (.J-.l.'l. w.'?V/\'.. '...... ...; : I T C fm'~~ rl;~~-i-,,"7~~~{ J-ml_~-l I ,~ ,,- ---"""1' ~..(..,."..._.._...-""<07V)l L-.......:~-... ,,~ / --~---__,..~./~.~.~~~..__....~ 11:, .'.' ';r~, " ~. ~"J74 I ,4' ,$1: "f' \ ~; i ,,'{-.,: [i rt-~). ,J~ t. ..... Q "oj. .' ~: ./ ~, ~ .I'~' ! ,0 ,~ . r-- l~~f,~ i~~ff~ l'\?:e .j" 1 ~.s .. L<\ '1~.....I'~~ 1 . ~ .._~-+! ~ -- ;. ....C.= .~[ .!._ ~._ ~ i , ~i i ft. . l~ . ~. I <... .~ ~:j~r~j~ Il ~ji ~ ~~ ~\$ '~:I i F~ 11"1- t'\~:; f'r..~~ r ~ I [' i.~.' . ....~,...j.'.: ""''\- . 'I. r k\.' .,~ . .... ~~ _ _ ---2..n '_.j.,,' ...+- ;;~. Ii \j ffY !~. .......-1..""::\.::t . ~l il~! ~ll ~'" I "'" I .k'.' , ~": i '1 , ; : I ----,.I "'~:':: .~. ~ ?!~. ~~,- "\~!. 1.0 ~v "'-'4 "';''i ~~: ~'7 k~ .. : "IC..--: ..t i"-d'f:" f of.... I: ~~, . ....! t'~i .~l i['-- I \:)i , ,,! iN' ~- ri '~ ! i i . ! ~,,:j .j -,:: ~i :;-4 ~d ~4 · , J.J.I....~.......... .......................... ................. ........-.......... .~;......-..."":'.-............. . ........... .......... ..... ~~:.;.:::.:..:-:..'.!.......... ...."................ ......... ..... ...........-.................,...h..".~.."'~..;. ... . ,,,.... ..' ......._. 'U'''_''~,''''.'.'.'.....~~~. .........,........ .__.....~~-:-........"".~....... '_._",,",-_ ...., . . .. ......-......... .. . ............ .-..-.....-...... .................... ';: 'I .\) ':s' I r~ d ! ! ". .~-~-...............~- F~=:;~:.~r.~:~.~::.,~:~:'::~:::~:.......:~::~::==:.==~~:N......'.'........" ...".......-........ : . '..iv~Jt{:~~~ . ( ... , .',,' ..' , . "~1J-1 ~(l':, (,. 'I'd.'" I.L~! ~'t<'> 1".' Bf, :*-t. /',:. p.;f-t~:~;;.J&~i~.,,:~>(.,;;tt~h:.:j6' . ~.~ :;~ '/..r'R!iJk.'t}~J~~" L~;:~\l,:!~.J) ~~.0J}(.13,~v~tyf..1 01...,J(~.I()K~rH) . ....NO.,6tA~ . _.__>.....L.._~_..___..,..... ._.~_.____._.w... ....._~.._^..,.._._.. ',W""".W"._. """_,'M_, ."....,.". ._.,..'....... .... ......."... ......._...._ ------.--y.,:,...-.....,...,..,.,,:......,---'''--.....::i.~;...'..'^. W^-:._...'^?......y..--:--..:-;:..~r..-'-i"'7". -.-, .. .. 'V ..----..~ t"',)k.:F-~>;f;:;~/.~. ,,_('(;! t-.I (-1 (~-') ..+--.. ~',- ; ~~~ " I ~.. "i ~ ~ ...j,- ~ '.......T I ~! Yi \'-i ! "-: i ..,I- . ...._.....................~_. ....._....n.._..._. ....-.NN...................u._~.. ~ .._....... .,.-..._.......,-.tNll'.. .....n _.__......._...._......~v......~u..."",...,,<<..-__..........__ ..... ..... _." h",_":::::::::,:::.':'::::-:~~..,,,,:::,,:::::;;;,:::::,,:,::; ==:...-::-.==:~:;.~;.::.:.:..:..~"::":'::,'_..:.~.~:.7:::::.-:::::= .~..........~~_._.__...........v.~~..~....._.... u.-.......'N....",.... ......,... 'N....'..............,.....,............. _.......'''"'''......,..'''..........u...:.:-.......n... ~~~~~2""""~~""~~ "f::::q"l:tr"~~~/~{~",~~If_ f._.......... iW. ., ~I '~i .... i : ~ ~: ~:"'...1 <i l.. -,t:1,~~~t,f2:t.P:~?,(i.:{~ [)1Jrl.,.:~~.,~~ / -;7~~1:~fu..;..~:~t~!\~~y~:~~~~",,'~~~,1~:~t!""",!!~:~~ ,':" :: ~j ~~ ........: ;;:: -It- 3~~T85 Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 February 23, 2005 Page 1 of 2 Findings of Fact A. The proposed project, as conditioned, and its design and improvements are consistent with the Low Density Residential land use designation of the General Plan and are otherwise consistent with all other elements of the General Plan and any applicable specific plans. The proposed comply with density. subdivision creates three the Low-Density Residential residential provisions, lots that including B. The proposed proj ect , as requirements of the zoning applicable City ordinances. conditioned, conforms and subdivision codes, to all applicable as well as other The proposed subdivision conforms to all provisions of the zoning and subdivision codes, including the minimum lot size and street frontage requirements, as well as meets the letter and intent of the State of California Subdivision Map Act provisions. C. The project site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed project. The project site is a residentially zoned lot that contains adequate street frontage for three conforming parcels. The proposed lot sizes meet the minimum required size of one dwelling unit per 6,000 square feet of lot area. There are no physical constraints on the site to preclude development. D. The design and improvements of the proposed proj ect substantial environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. will and not cause avoidable There are no wetlands or unusual flora or fauna on or around the proj ect site. No development surrounding this site will be affected by this proposal. E. The design or improvements of the proposed project will not cause serious public health problems. The proposed infill development is residential and compliance with the Single-Family Residential building requirements. will be in zoning and 3~~T96 Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 February 23, 2005 Page 2 of 2 F. The design of improvements of the proposed project will not conflict with easements necessary for public access through or use of the property within the proposed project. There are no easements that would affect the use or development of this site. 31 B-1 0 FEBRUARY 23, 2005 PAGEIOFl Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this tentative parcel map. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the tentative parcel map. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the tentative parcel map. A. Planning Division 1. The Final Map is required to be recorded within two years of the date of approval of the tentative map by the City Council. 2. Two copies of the recorded Final Map need to be submitted each to the Planning Division and Public Works Agency within 10 days of recordation. 3 . All development within development and permi t issuance. the fees area of the in effect at map the is subject to time of permit 4. All development within the area of the map is subject to all design and development standards in effect at the time of permit issuance. 5. The tentative map, final map, and all improvements required to be made or installed by the subdivider will be in accordance with the design standards and specifications of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act. 6. All proposed site improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review approval of DP No. 04-25. 3~~171 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING SUMMARY MINUTES February 23, 2005 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2005-02 10:38 A.M. Mr. Kenneth Adams, Zoning Administrator, opened the public hearing in the City Hall Ross Annex Conference Room 2001. Also in attendance were: Karen Haluza, Principal Planner; Verny Carvajal, Associate Planner; Truong Nguyen, Applicant/Owner; Dung Sam, Designer; and Rosa Barela, Acting Recording Secretary. Verny Carvajal, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and recommendation. Mr. Adams asked Mr. Truong if the properties would be sold. Mr. Truong answered he plans on keeping the properties for family use. Mr. Adams inquired on the driveway. Mr. Carvajal noted there would be a reciprocal agreement for access of the shared driveway. Discussion ensued on the length and width of the driveway and the block wall between the driveways. Mr. Adams noted concern on the 14-foot wide driveways with the block wall adding there may be awkward turning movements for vehicles. Mr. Adams requested that Mr. Carvajal work with the Public Works Agency on the driveways. Mr. Adams inquired if Mr. Truong had any questions and if he agreed with the conditions of approval. Mr. Truong noted he had no questions and agreed to conditions. The Zoning Administrator approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 as conditioned. The hearing adjourned at 10:46 a.m. /---------) /1 -') 'JC/~<lp-- I/~Ja~t Rosa Barela Acting Recording Secretary 2 318-12 KO - 03/1/05 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2005-02 AS CONDITIONED FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4004 WEST MCFADDEN AVENUE (COUNTY MAP NO. 2004-100) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Applicant is requesting approval of a tentative parcel map to subdivide a OAB-acre parcel into three residential lots at 4004 West McFadden Avenue, to facilitate the construction of two new single-family dwellings. B. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 came before the Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana for a duly noticed public hearing February 23, 2005. C. The Zoning Administrator determines that the following findings have been established: 1. The proposed project, as conditioned, and its design and improvements are consistent with the Low Density Residential land use designation of the General Plan and are otherwise consistent with all other elements of the General Plan and any applicable specific plans. The proposed subdivision creates three residential lots that comply with the Low-Density Residential provisions, including density. 2. The proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to all applicable requirements of the zoning and subdivision codes, as well as other applicable City ordinances. The proposed subdivision conforms to all provisions of the zoning and subdivision codes, including the minimum lot size and street frontage requirements, as well as meets the letter and intent of the State of California Subdivision Map Act provisions. 318-13 Resolution No. 2005-01 Page 1 of 3 3. The project site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed project. The project site is a residentially zoned lot that contains adequate street frontage for three conforming parcels. The proposed lot sizes meet the minimum required size of one dwelling unit per 6,000 square feet of lot area. There are no physical constraints on the site to preclude development. 4. The design and improvements of the proposed project will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no wetlands or unusual flora or fauna on or around the project site. No development surrounding this site will be affected by this proposal. 5. The design or improvements of the proposed project will not cause serious public health problems. The proposed infill development is residential and will be in compliance with the Single-Family Residential zoning and building requirements. 6. The design of improvements of the proposed project will not conflict with easements necessary for public access through or use of the property within the proposed project. There are no easements that would affect the use or development of this site. Section 2. This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15332. This Class 32 exemption allows in-fill developments on properties of less than five acres that meet applicable General Plan and zoning regulations. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2004-072 will be filed for this project. Section 3. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the public hearing hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 as conditioned in Exhibit "AU attached hereto and incorporated herein. Resolution No. 2005-01 Page 2 of 3 31 8-14 ADOPTED this 23rd day of February, 2005. Kenneth Adams Zoning Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Kylee O. Otto Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Clerk of the Zoning Administrator, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2005-01 to be the original resolution adopted by the Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana on February 23, 2005. Date: Clerk of the Zoning Administrator City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2005-01 Page 3 of 3 318-15 Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-02 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this tentative parcel map. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the tentative parcel map. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the tentative parcel map. A. PlanninQ Division 1. The Final Map is required to be recorded within two years of the date of approval of the tentative map by the City Council. 2. Two copies of the recorded Final Map need to be submitted each to the Planning Division and Public Works Agency within 10 days of recordation. 3. All development within the area of the map is subject to development and permit fees in effect at the time of permit issuance. 4. All development within the area of the map is subject to all design and development standards in effect at the time of permit issuance. 5. The tentative map, final map, and all improvements required to be made or installed by the subdivider will be in accordance with the design standards and specifications of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act. 6. All proposed site improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review approval of DP No. 04-25. Exhibit "A" 318-16 REQUEST FOR e COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AUGUST 2, 2004 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL NO. 2004-02 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 924 NORTH LOWELL STREET u~~-- CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Deny Appeal No. 2004-02. 2. Adopt a resolution approving Application No. 2003-45. e CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: "" APPROV~~~ommended /t'-L! -( Y D As Amended D Ordinance on 1 st Reading D Ordinance on 2nd Reading D Implementing Resolution D Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO q -1-6 ti I \ 0 - i-f -0 ~. (bO t#-~ 5 )c If -( 5 LHf) " FILE NUMBER \2 t:'5tJ 2CJ{)lj-(J -52) 'd- d-d -05: 3 -~l -(I) ~ J Historic Resources Commission 3. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Register Categorization No. 2003-47. HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION ACTION By direction of the City Council the Historic Resources Commission on June 3, 2004 reconsidered the structure located at 924 North Lowell Street for placement and categorization on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as Key. The Commission adopted a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2003-45 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2003-47 for 924 North Lowell Street at its' June 3, 2004 meeting by a vote of 5:1 (Schaefer opposed, Gartner and O'Callaghan absent, Lutz abstained) . DISCUSSION Request of Applicant Mr. Fernando Astran, owner of the Joe Lowell House, located at 924 North Lowell Street, requests the approval of Appeal No. 2004-02 to prevent the placement and categorization of his property as Key on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. His reasons for appealing the register listing include: 1) building and landscape restrictions and 2) ownership rights and privileges (Exhibit 1). 55A-1 e e Appeal No. 2004-02 August 2, 2004 Page 2 Analysis of the Issues The Joe Lowell House (Exhibit 2) was one of 16 structures identified as potential candidates for the Santa Ana Register based on a field survey of the Washington Square Neighborhood. The 16 property owners were notified by mail on May 21, 2003 of the proposed placement and invited to attend a special presentation on the implications and benefits of the Santa Ana Register listing. On November 6, 2003, the Historic Resources Commission continued action on this property for 90 days to allow Mr. Astran additional time to evaluate the benefits and responsibilities of being placed on the Register. Prior to the February 5, 2003 Commission hearing, staff spoke to Mr. Astran requesting that he send or fax a letter to the Commission stating his position on the Register placement if he could not attend the hearing. Mr. Astran did not communicate with the Commission before the hearing. The Commission subsequently approved the Joe Lowell House placement on the Santa Ana Register. Following the hearing, staff met with Mr. Astran on February 13, 2004 to discuss his preliminary house improvement ideas, which included window replacement, re-stuccoing building exterior, kitchen addition, interior improvements and removal of the Pine tree on the north side of the house (Tenth Street). At this meeting staff discussed the Secretary of Interior Standards and their application to the Joe Lowell House. Staff encouraged Mr. Astran to: 1) Where feasible, repair instead of replace the wood windows, 2) Replace deteriorated windows with like materials that repeat the style, size, mullion pattern and method of operation as well as retain the trim, molding and sill design, and 3) Repair the stucco to retain the integrity of the original textured application style. After this meeting, Mr. Astran filed the appeal application to meet the application timeline but suggested staff delay proceeding with the appeal to determine if his issues could be resolved. On March 8, 2004, staff visited the property to review the exterior damage described by Mr. Astran that necessitated the proposed modifications. Following staff's site visit of the property, staff contacted Mr. Astran and he requested that the City proceed with the appeal. On April 19, 2004, the City Council remanded the appeal back to the Historic Resources Commission for reconsideration of the placement and categorization of the Joe Lowell House on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Mr. Astran addressed his concerns to the Commission at the June 3, 2004 hearing. In addition correspondence prepared by Mr. Astran, dated April 26, 2004, was included as an exhibit in the Commission staff report (Exhibit 3). The Commission approved the placement of the Joe Lowell House and categorized the structure as Key because of its unique architectural style and association with a prominent local resident. 55A-2 e e Appeal No. 2004-02 August 2, 2004 Page 3 The Joe Lowell House was built in 1924, it qualifies for listing on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as a building with distinguishing characteristics of the Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival and Pueblo Revival architectural style and for its association with Joe Lowell. Mr. Lowell was instrumental in the development of Washington Square. This structure is also eligible to be placed within the Key category for its distinctive architectural style and quality. In summary, over three months prior to any action by the Historic Resources Commission, City staff began the outreach process to the Washington Square Neighborhood and specifically to the property owners of the structures that were eligible to be placed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. During the two meetings held for the neighborhood, the Washington Square residents expressed their support and interest in the City's historic preservation efforts. Based on the advance outreach extended to the property owner and the findings supporting the eligibility of the Joe Lowell House for placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, it is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application Nos. 2003-45 and Historic Register Categorization Nos. 2003- 47. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. s1i1.. ~f)~g Executive Director Planning & Building Agency LP:rb Lp\Historic\HRC Staff Reports\RFCA's\2nd Lowell appeal cc 55A-3 ClTYOF~ANTA ANA rLA~~I~G & BULDI~G AGner Plannin~ _ Building Agency Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 (M-20) Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 647-5804 www.santa-ana.org e APPEAL APPLICATION i[:!ili:lillliliiliiim]:::::mi~iiln[:~;~Jil!iiliir:ir:r:::r::mu:miil[]!:iIi:nl!:::::::!lii[JilUJ!!mLilllll:Jiiil]]~[[rr::[:n:r:nm~:~~~[i:~mmiiiJmm:ni:nmm!ilmiil I. OWNER/APPLICANT Applicant +:.:c.::~"tA-1J.&O ~~ /' ,\ " \ ( _ Full na~. .of Person, Firm, or Corporation '--1d-- \' 1'-\' --Du_=>t_~ <3 J: Mailing Address ~ A Legal Owner Name: t-~~~o T\~ Legal Owner Address: Of d..-L/-- c0 ' Gbu...X...~ s-i:: ~~ '\'VI ~ lit- CA4 0, d- 1 0 ~ Phone No.:(l11.{ )S"50 Ill~ (2i~) 2-44- S~<(;L\ Fax:{lI'i)SC::O I)~~ (ll4- )SSO 11/,% Area Code Phone No. II. PROPERTY INFORMATION Land Use Existing Land Use of Property and/or Building Zoning District General Plan Designation Location Street Address Name of Nearest Intersecting Street SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS III. REASON FOR REQUEST In the following provided space, please clearly specify and explain the error(s) of decision or requirement upon which you are basing this appeal. (If additional space is needed, please attach additional comments to the back of this application.) "7 4~ i1t:-77C9A./ -5 /I *5Ti!'/~e -?L~ I OE5//..AJA-T7tHL r ,e!-r C; JI' TS / LfJrf/ /'tIY ~//1? ~ 7<:J ---r-r-he~/ C7c1 ///y ~//5/C / ?:?)zc-rrz- / V I I Applicant's Signature: Date: &-/7/01 . I APPEAL APPLICATION NO. EXHIBIT 1 cm\cntr-frm\appeal 12/03 55A-4 .. e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY e JOE LOWELL HOUSE 924 North Lowell Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME ADDRESS CITY YEAR BUILT Joe Lowell House I REF. NO. 924 North Lowell Street 1924 ZIP I 92706 I ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Key NEIGHBORHOOD I Washington Square NATIONAL REGISTER STATUS CODE ISSl Santa Ana HISTORIC DISTRICT I N/A NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EV ALUA TION I A,C Location: D Not for Publication IZI Unrestricted D Prehistoric IZI Historic D Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival, Pueblo Revival The Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival style, as its name implies, encompasses two major subcategories. The Mission Revival vocabulary, popular between 1890 and 1920, drew its inspiration from the missions of the Southwest. Identifying features include curved parapets (or espadafia); red tiled roofs and coping; low-pitched roofs, often with overhanging eaves; porch roofs supported by large, square piers; arches; and wall surfaces commonly covered in smooth stucco. The Spanish Colonial Revival flourished between 1915 and 1940, reaching its apex during the 1920s and 1930s. The movement received widespread attention after the Panama- California Exposition in San Diego in 1915, where lavish interpretations of Spanish and Mexican prototypes were showcased. Easily recognizable hallmarks of the Spanish Colonial Revival are low-pitched roofs, usually with little or no overhangs and red tile roof coverings, flat roofs surrounded by tiled parapets; and stuccoed walls. The Spanish vocabulary also includes arches; asymmetry; balconies and patios; window grilles; and decorative elements of wood, wrought iron, tile, or stone. The Pueblo Revival first appeared in California in the early years of the twentieth century, but only rose to popularity in the 1920s and 1930s, primarily in the Southwest. Combining the features of the Mission and Spanish Revivals with the vocabulary of Native American pueblos, the style is characterized by stuccoed exteriors that either simulate or mask adobe construction, flat roofs with irregular parapets, buttressed comers, and projecting roof beams, called vigas, extending through wall surfaces. Openings are flat- headed, rather than arched, and may have rough-hewn wooden timbers set flush with the wall surface used as lintels. The stepped back massing and handmade quality of the original pueblos is often evoked (McAlester, pages 434-437). SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The Joe Lowell House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, as a building with the "distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period." The property also qualifies for the Santa Ana Register under Criterion 4b, for its association with Joe Lowell, who was instrumental to the development of Washington Square. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it "has a distinctive architectural style and quality" as an example of the Spanish Colonial Revival style influenced by the Pueblo Revival, and for its association "with a significant person" in the history of the area, Joe Lowell. (Municipal Code Section 30-2.2)." EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 5 55A-5 e EXPLANATION OF CODES: . National Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From Appendix 7 of Instructions for Recording Historical Resources, Office of Historic Preservation) A: that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. C: that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. . National Register Status Code: (From Appendix 2 ofInstructions for Recording Historical Resources, Office of Historic Preservation) 5S1 Is separately listed or designated under an existing local ordinance, or is eligible for such listing or designation. Page 2 of 5 55A-6 State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Primary # HRI# Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page -1- of 2 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Joe Lowell House P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: DNot for Publication -Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Anaheim TCA 0054 Date: *c. Address: 924 Norlh Lowell Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number: 405-182-25 Sec 12 T 5 R 10 Por SE 1/4 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) Occupying a triple lot at the corner of Norlh Lowell and West Tenth Streets, this two-story Spanish Colonial Revival residence suggests the influence of the Pueblo Revival style with its cubic massing. The house is an assemblage of stuccoed, flat- roofed volumes with unadorned parapets that rise slightly at some corners. Projections on the east and norlh elevations are topped by tiled shed roofs. Rectangular, grilled vents and viga-like corbels accent the parapets. The main entry is located within an arcaded porch located on the norlh elevation. Arches of different shapes are used for the porch openings, the doorway, a large, fixed glass window east of the porch, and to frame French doors on the east elevation. Two banks of triparlite casement windows, separated by a stuccoed chimney, are centered above the porch and are shaded by tiled shed roofs supporled by carved wood brackets. An identical window and hood, fronted by a small balcony, sit directly west of the porch. On the east elevation, waist high patio walls are integrated with house and the garage south of the house. Buttresses with curvilinear profiles divide the patio spaces. Set back on its generous lot, surrounded by grass and shaded by a mature evergreen tree, the properly is in fair condition and retains its integrity. A curved concrete block wall fragment, landscaped with agapanthus, marks the street corner. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single-family Properly P5a. Photo *P4. Resources Present: _Building DStructure DObject DSite o District DElement of District DOther *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None. P5b. Photo: (view and date) East and norlh elevations May 2003 *P6. Date ConstructedlAge and Sources: _historic 1924/ Source: City of Santa Ana Building Permits *P7. Owner and Address: Fernando and Marian Astran 924 North Lowell Street Santa Ana, CA 92703 *P8. Recorded by: Leslie J. Heumann SAIC 35 S. Raymond Ave. # 204 Pasadena, CA 91105 *P9. Date Recorded: August 29, 2003 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey *Attachments: DNone DLocation Map DSketch Map -Continuation Sheet -Building, Structure, and Object Record DArchaeological Record DDistrict Record DLinear Feature Record DMilling Station Record DRock Art Record DArtifact Record DPhotograph Record 0 Other (list) DPR 523A (1/95) Page 3 of 5 55A-7 *Required information e State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUilDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page ---2..- of L *NRHP Status Code 5S1 *Resource Name or #: Joe Lowell House B1. Historic Name: Joe Lowell House B2. Common Name: Same B3. Original Use: Single-family Residence 84. Present Use: Single-family Residence *85. Architectural Style: Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival, Pueblo Revival *86. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): Constructed in 1924. March 1924. Residence and garage. August 11, 1941. Reroof ($100). May 29, 1944. Reroof ($165). March 9, 1950. Reroof ($98). July 16, 1951. Reroof ($68).. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) *87. Moved? _No DYes DUnknown Date: *88. Related Features: Original Location: Garage, mature evergreen tree in north lawn. 89a. Architect: Unknown b. 8uilder: Unknown *810. Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: circa 1888-1953 Property Type: Single-family Residence Applicable Criteria: A, C (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Joe Lowell House is architecturally significant as an unusual example of the Spanish Colonial Revival that has been influenced by the Pueblo Revival style. It is historically significant as the home of the subdivider of Lowell Street, Joe Lowell, who built this house in 1924 at a cost of $15,000, a significant investment for the time. Described by historian Samuel Armor as an "industrious, successful man of comfortable affluence," Joe Lowell was also a rancher. He was born in Sacramento in 1872 and came to Santa Ana initially in 1903, left to work on a ranch in Texas, and returned in 1912, settling on his father-in- law's fourteen and a half acre ranch and raising Valencia oranges and walnuts. It is assumed that he died in the mid 1940s, when his wife, Mabel Townsend Lowell, moved to 926 North Olive Street. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *812. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps Sketch Map .ii TDtTH r (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) (This space reserved for official comments.) i .. i .. @ @ @ , TRACT' , B13. Remarks: *814. Evaluator: Leslie J. Heumann *Date of Evaluation: August 29,2003 0., @ @.n. @ Joe Lowell House 924 North Lowell Street Page 4 of 5 DPR 5238 (1/95) 55A-8 *Required information State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary # HRI# Page 20f2 *Recorded by Leslie J. Heumann, SAIC Trinomial Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Joe Lowell House *Date August 29, 2003 [2S] Continuation 0 Update *86. Construction History (continued): December 29, 1954. Patio addition to residence. January 21, 1982. Addition to garage. May 17, 1988. Wrought iron and block wall. July 26, 2002. Partial reroof of garage overhang. Tear off existing tile roof, repair dry rot, etc., and apply roof with same tile. *810. Significance (continued): Santa Ana was founded by William Spurgeon in 1869 as a speculative town site on part of the Spanish land grant known as Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. The civic and commercial core of the community was centered around the intersection of Main and Fourth Streets. Stimulated by the arrival of the Santa Fe Railroad and incorporation as a city in 1886, and selection as the seat of the newly created County of Orange in 1889, the city grew outwards, with residential neighborhoods developing to the north, south, and east of the city center. Agricultural uses predominated in the outlying areas, with cultivated fields and orchards dotted with widely scattered farmhouses. The Joe Lowell House is located in Washington Square, a neighborhood located northwest of the city center bounded by West Seventeenth Street on the north, West Civic Center Drive on the south, North Flower Street on the east, and North Bristol Street on the west. Most of this area was owned by the family of Jacob Ross, who had purchased portions of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana in 1868 and 1869. Walnuts and other crops were grown in the area during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, with a few farmhouses, most notably the Ross-McNeal House at 1020 North Baker Street, dotting the landscape. By 1905, Baker and Towner were the only streets in the neighborhood, which extended from Hickey (now Civic Center) only as far as Washington and which contained only about a dozen homes. The status quo had not changed much by 1915, when a brick yard was located at the northern terminus of Olive Street at Hickey. In 1925, the beginning of the development that would convert this largely agricultural area into a middle class neighborhood of single- family homes over the next 25 years had begun. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, the Tudor Revival and Spanish Colonial Revival homes were the standard, with American Colonial Revival saltboxes and ranch style homes favored in the years before and after World War II. During the 1930s, many of the homes were built by local contractor Emmett Rogers, who sold lots and built homes according to standard plans, which individual property owners could customize to their tastes ('Washington Square: A Neighborhood of Pride," Washington Square Neighborhood Association). With the return of servicemen following the war and the accompanying demand for homes in southern California, the development of Washington Square was all but completed. The Joe Lowell House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, as a building with the "distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period." Stylistic signatures of the Spanish Colonial Revival such the use of stucco and red clay tile and arched openings are combined in this unusual home with the cubic massing and stylized buttresses and vigas more associated with the Pueblo Revival style of the 1920s. The property also qualifies for the Santa Ana Register under Criterion 4b, for its association with Joe Lowell, who was instrumental to the development of Washington Square. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it "has a distinctive architectural style and quality" as an example of the Spanish Colonial Revival style influenced by the Pueblo Revival, and for its association "with a significant person" in the history of the area, Joe Lowell. Character defining exterior features of the Joe Lowell House that should be preserved include, but may not be limited to: materials and finishes (stucco, wood); roof configuration and treatment; massing and composition; doors and windows; porch and patios; garage; architectural detailing (buttresses, grilles, corbels, window hoods);chimney; and mature evergreen tree in north lawn. *812. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encvclooedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana. An Illustrated Historv. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources." Sacramento: March 1995. Armor, Samuel. Historv of Oranae County. Los Angeles: Historic Record Company, 1921. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-1930. 'Washington Square: A Neighborhood with Pride." Washington Square Neighborhood Association, no date. Page 5 of 5 DPR 523L 55A-9 e e April 26, 2004 Fernando and Marian Astran 924 North Lowell Street Santa Ana, CA 92703 (714) 480-0366 Subject: Eligibility for listing on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties Dear Commission: My wife and I are declining the proposed Historical Property eligibility for our home located at 924 North Lowell Street in the City of Santa Ana. We wish to thank the Commission for their invitation to place our home on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. However, after interacting with city staff regarding this issue, my wife and I are firm in our joint decision not to participate in this process. City staff shared the proposed positives of our property being part of the Registry and we disagree with city staff about those benefits to us as homeowners. We feel strongly that just the opposite is true in our case, and that the restrictions that will be imposed on the property encroach on our property rights. We wish to thank city staff for their effort in this fact-finding process, but we have no further desire to continue in this manner regarding this process. We have taken time from work, rearranged work schedules, spent personal time after business hours and on weekends, and spent additional revenues regarding this matter, all in good faith to address this process and reach our decision. We strongly urge the Commission to respect our decision not to include our property located at 924 North Lowell Street in the Santa Ana Register Historical Property process. Thank you for your understanding and consideration in this sensitive matter. j// ~. / c---___ bY-----3-- I Marian Astran EXHIBIT 3 55A-1 0 EXEMPTFROMFEESPURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 9 6103 KO- 3/14/05 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PLACING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 924 NORTH LOWELL STREET ON THE HISTORICAL REGISTER AND PLACING WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED CATEGORY (APPEAL NO. 2004-02) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On November 6, 2003, the Historic Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for the placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties and categorization of the Joe Lowell House located at 924 North Lowell Street, Santa Ana. The Commission continued the public hearing for ninety (90) days. B. On February 5, 2004, the continued public hearing was held, and the Historic Resources Commission adopted a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2003-45 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2003-47, by a vote of 6-3 (Giles, Kings, O'Callaghan opposed). C. The property owner appealed the Historic Resources Commission action to the City Council. On April 19, 2004, the City Council remanded the item to the Historic Resources Commission to allow the property owner an opportunity to address the Commission. D. On June 3, 2004, the Historic Resources Commission reconsidered Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2003-45 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2003-47, and by a vote of 5-1 (Schaefer opposed, Gartner, O'Callaghan absent, Lutz abstained) approved said Application and Categorization. E. The property owner appealed the Historic Resources Commission action to the City Council (Appeal No. 2004-02). On August 2, 2004, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana continued the public hearing to September 7,2004, by a vote of 5-0 (Christy and Alvarez absent). 1. On September 7, 2004 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana after closing the public 55A-11 Resolution No. 2005-XXX Page 1 of 4 EXEMPTFROMFEESPURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE S 6103 hearing, voted by a vote of 5-0 (Alvarez, abstained and Garcia, absent) continued the matter to October 4, 2004 by a vote of 6-0 (Alvarez, abstained). 2. On October 4, 2004, the City Council voted by a vote of 6-0 (Alvarez, abstained) to continue the matter for sixty (60) days. 3. On November 15, 2004, the City Council voted by a vote of 6-0 (Alvarez, abstained) to continue the matter for an additional sixty (60) days. 4. On February 22, 2005, the City Council voted by a vote of 6-0 (Alvarez, abstained) to continue the matter to March 21,2005. F. The Joe Lowell House, located at 924 North Lowell Street, Santa Ana, was built in 1924 and qualifies for listing on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as a building with distinguishing characteristics of the Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival and Pueblo Revival architectural style and for its association with Joe Lowell. Mr. Lowell was instrumental in the development of Washington Square. 1. This structure is also eligible to be placed within the Key category for its distinctive architectural style and quality as illustrated by its cubic massing, stylized buttresses, vigas, arched openings, stucco and red clay tile. 2. The legal owners of the subject property are Fernando & Marian Astra n. 3. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 4. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Property pursuant to Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 5. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement in the key category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(2) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Section 3: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review. A Categorical Exemption will be filed for this project. Section 4: The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby denies Appeal No. 2004-02 and approves Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2003-45 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2003-47 for the property located at 924 North Lowell Street, Santa Ana. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearings, which includes but not is not limited to: the Staff reports and exhibits attached thereto; 55A-12 Resolution No. 2005-XXX Page 2 of 4 EXEMPTFROMFEESPURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE ~ 6103 the reports entitled "Historical Property Description;" and the public testimony all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5: For the subject property, a report entitled "Historical Property Description," is on file in the Planning and Building Department, and is hereby approved and adopted, and together with the staff report and this resolution, justify the findings for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties into a category. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is authorized and directed to include this resolution in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Section 6. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder's Office after the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029. Section 7. This decision rendered by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana is final and is subject to judicial review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6. The Clerk of the Council shall give direct notice to the applicant of the Council's decision and these findings. ADOPTED this _ day of March, 2005. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Kylee O. Otto Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers 55A-13 Resolution No. 2005-XXX Page 3 of 4 EXEMPTFROMFEESPURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 9 6103 NOT PRESENT: Council members CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2005-030 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 55A-14 Resolution No. 2005-XXX Page 4 of 4 EXEMPTFROMFEESPURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 9 6103 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. 924 N. Lowell Street 5S~~' 5 55A-16 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ~ ~ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: MARCH 21, 2005 TITLE: RESOLUTIONS PERTAINING TO UNAFFILIATED CONFIDENTIAL UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES AND APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For ( //;~/J ;Y/h,,-*/ J 'f-('c" v CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO -- FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a Resolution regarding salary and benefits for Unaffiliated Confidential classifications of employment. 2. Adopt a Resolution regarding salary and benefits for unrepresented management classifications of employment. DISCUSSION In conjunction with the approval of several Memoranda of Understanding with employee unions in the City, the subject action will provide for similar compensation and employee benefit increases for the Unaffiliated Confidential (UC) employees. The UC classifications are those assigned to perform work in confidential budget and employer-employee relation acti vi ties. This would include employees holding positions of Executive Assistants, Legal Secretaries, Management Analyst, and some Executive Secretaries, and including employees in the Personnel Services Agency and City Attorney's Office. In addition, the subject action will provide similar compensation and employee benefit changes to unrepresented management employees. These positions include all the Executive Directors and Officers of the City. Specifically, the City Council will approve the same compensation and employee benefit increases as applicable to those provided other represented management classifications. These benefit changes will include, but will not be limited to changes in medical, dental, VlSlon, bereavement leave, and longevity vacation cash-out benefits. 558-1 Resolutions for Unrepresented Confidential and Unrepresented Management Employees March 21, 2005 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the following affected departmental accounts: Salary account (Object Code 6111) and Benefits account (Object Code 6171). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Department ( \, 1- .\~\'C\.~\<.:\.I'Q ~~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 558-2 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 82-110 TO AMEND THE BASIC CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN FOR CLASSIFICATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT DE SIGNA TED AS UNAFFILIATED CONFIDENTIAL. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Section 1004, Article X of the City Charter of the City of Santa Ana requires the City Manager to prepare, install and maintain a position classification and pay plan subject to civil service rules and regulations and the approval of the City Council. B. On August 2, 1982, the City Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 82-110 revising and re-establishing the Basic Classification and Compensation Plan for officers and employees of the City of Santa Ana. C. On December 21, 1987 the City Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 87-94, amending Resolution No. 82-110 to establish a basic compensation plan for classifications of employment designated as Unaffiliated Confidential (UC), and to set forth certain levels of salaries and benefits for theses classifications. Resolution 82- 110 has been amended from time to time to allow for adjustments to the wages, salaries, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for employees designated as Uc. D. The City of Santa Ana and several of its formally recognized employee associations have reached agreement that the City will provide certain adjustments in wages, salaries, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for full-time represented employees covered by these agreements during Fiscal Years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. E. It is the City's desire that full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees shall continue to be subject to similar adjustments in wages, salaries, and benefits and shall continue to receive the same retirement, health and other benefits based on similar conditions as are provided to employees associated with certain of the recognized employee associations already having entered into Agreements with the City. F. In consideration of the above, it is the City's desire to: 1. Adjust the base salaries of Unaffiliated Confidential classifications in generally the same manner as provided, or as will be provided, for full-time represented 1 558-3 general service "miscellaneous" classifications during the four year period July 1,2004 through June 30, 2008, as follows: July 1, 2004: 0% (No increase) July 1, 2005: 0% (No increase) July 1, 2006: Minimum increase of3.5%, not to exceed 4.5% * July 1, 2007: Minimum increase of3.5%, not to exceed 4.5% * (* The maximum percentage amount of the salary increase in excess of3.5% shall be equal to the percentage increase received by the Santa Ana Police Officer's Association, not exceeding the maximum of 4.5%) 2. Continue to treat Unaffiliated Confidential classifications as subject to the same basic classification and compensation plan provisions and their application as those which pertain to certain full-time represented general service "miscellaneous" classifications. 3. Continue to provide full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees with the same health and retirement benefits and benefit changes, based on similar conditions, as provided or as will be provided to certain full-time represented general service "miscellaneous" employees, and continue to provide full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees with several additional benefits not provided to full-time represented general service "miscellaneous" employees. G. It is now desired to amend Council Resolution No. 82-110, as amended, to effect these objectives. Section 2. That Section 3 of Resolution No. 82-110 Assignment of Classes ofEmplovrnent to Salary Rate Ranges, as amended, is hereby further amended by assigning the following classifications to the salary rate ranges, on the effective dates, as next hereinafter set out: 6 Step Salary Rate Range No. Effective: Classification Title 7/1/04 (annual $ min-max) 7/1/05 7/1/06 7/1/07 Council Services Secretary (UC) 545 (35760-45636) 545 * ** Executive Assistant (UC) 601 (46980-60024) 601 * ** Executive Secretary to the Police Chief (UC) 576 (41604-53112) 576 * ** Legal Management Assistant (Exempt) (UC) 653 (60612-77352) 653 * ** Legal Office Assistant (UC) 500 (28692-36624) 500 * ** Legal Secretary (UC) 544 (35580-45408) 544 * ** 2 558-4 Liability Claims Coordinator (UC) 634 (55212-70512) 634 * ** Liability Claims Processor (UC) 549 (36480-46560) 549 * ** Loss Control Analyst (UC) 609 (48888-62412) 609 * ** Loss Control Office Specialist (UC) 549 (36480-46560) 549 * ** 6 Step Salary Rate Range No. Effective: Classification Title 7/1/04 (annual $ min-max) 7/1/05 7/1/06 7/1/07 Loss Control Technician (UC) 598 (46332-59160) 598 * ** Management Aide (UC) 598 (46332-59160) 598 * ** Management Analyst (UC) 624 (52584-67152) 624 * ** Management Assistant (Exempt) (UC) 624 (52584-67152) 624 * ** Outreach Program Coordinator (UC) 653 (60612-77352) 653 * ** Paralegal (Exempt) (UC) 579 (42228-53916) 579 * ** Payroll Assistant (UC) 578 (42012-53640) 578 * ** Personnel Analyst (UC) 609 (48888-62412) 609 * ** Personnel Executive Secretary (UC) 566 (39624-50580) 566 * ** Personnel Secretary (UC) 545 (35760-45636) 545 * ** Personnel Services Receptionist (UC) 527 (32760-41808) 527 * ** Personnel Services Specialist (UC) 537 (34404-43896) 537 * ** Personnel Technician (UC) 578 (42012-53640) 578 * ** Police Personnel Services Specialist (UC) 558 (38112-48648) 558 * ** Secretary to the City Manager (UC) 622 (52068-66504) 622 * ** Senior Legal Office Assistant (UC) 527 (32760-41808) 527 * ** Senior Legal Secretary (UC) 566 (39624-50580) 566 * ** Senior Management Analyst (UC) 653 (60612-77352) 653 * ** Senior Management Assistant (Exempt) (UC) 653 (60612-77352) 653 * ** Senior Personnel Analyst (UC) 653 (60612-77352) 653 * ** Senior Personnel Receptionist (UC) 545 (35760-45636) 545 * ** Senior Personnel Services Specialist (UC) 558 (38112-48648) 558 * ** Senior Personnel Technician (UC) 598 (46332-59160) 598 * ** Senior Workers' Compensation Claims Assistant (DC) 573 (40980-52320) 573 * ** Senior Workers' Compensation Claims Examiner (UC) 628 (53640-68472) 628 * ** Training Coordinator (UC) 653 (60612-77352) 653 * ** Workers' Compensation Claims Assistant (UC) 549 (36480-46560) 549 * ** Workers' Compensation Claims Examiner (UC) 598 (46332-59160) 598 * ** * Effective July 1, 2006, classifications designated as Unaffiliated Confidential (DC) will receive a salary increase not less than seven salary rate ranges (approximately three and one-half percent (3.5%)), and not to exceed nine salary rate ranges (approximately four and one-half percent (4.5%)). The maximum percentage amount of the salary increase in excess of 3.5% 3 558-5 shall be equal to the percentage increase received by the Santa Ana Police Officer's Association, not exceeding the maximum of 4.5%. ** Effective July 1,2007, classifications designated as Unaffiliated Confidential (UC) will receive a salary increase not less than seven salary rate ranges (approximately three and one-half percent (3.5%)), and not to exceed nine salary rate ranges (approximately four and one-half percent (4.5%)). The maximum percentage amount of the salary increase in excess of3.5% shall be equal to the percentage increase received by the Santa Ana Police Officer's Association, not exceeding the maximum of 4.5%. Section 3. That Section 12 of Resolution No. 82-110 Employee Benefits for Full-Time Civil Service Confidential Employees, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 12. Employee Benefits for Full-Time Unaffiliated Confidential Employees. Each full-time employee in a classification of employment designated in Section 3 ofthis Resolution as Unaffiliated Confidential (UC), shall continue to receive as additional compensation, any and all employee benefits which they were entitled to receive on June 30, 2004, by prior action of the City Council, except as modified below: A. Workweek. A 9/80 workweek schedule, as authorized by the Department Head and approved by the City Manager, will be available to full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees, effective the date of adoption of this Resolution. B. Deferred Compensation. As previously provided, an amount equal to one percent (1 %) of the base semi-monthly pay rate being paid each full-time affected Unaffiliated Confidential employee is deemed to be deferred compensation and shall be contributed into the City's deferred compensation plan by the City on behalf of each affected employee. The amounts contributed by the City under this provision shall be subject to the general terms and conditions ofthe City of Santa Ana Deferred Compensation Plan, and subject, further, to the conditions that the employee shall have no vested rights in the amounts contributed by the City until termination of employment with the City and that the City will pay the total amount of contributions plus any earnings to the employee upon termination, resignation, retirement, dismissal or death. C. Notary Public Pay. Effective as soon as practicable after the date of adoption of this Resolution, a full-time employee who is required by a Department Head or their designee to perform the duties of a Notary Public for the City, in addition to regular duties, shall be paid a monthly pay premium of forty dollars ($40) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. D. Primary Bilingual Pay. Effective the first day of the first pay period following the date of adoption of this Resolution, the monthly pay premium paid to a full-time qualified Unaffiliated Confidential incumbent of each position defined by the 4 558-6 Department Head as "primary bilingual" will be increased by an additional twenty-five dollars ($25.00) above the employee's base monthly salary step, making the total monthly pay premium one hundred seventy-five dollars ($175.00). E. Tuition Reimbursement. As previously provided, regular full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees shall continue to be eligible to participate in the existing Training and Education Assistance Program provided for all regular, full-time employees ofthe City; except, however, reimbursement for eligible employees shall be one hundred percent (100%) oftuition and registration costs up to a maximum oftwo thousand dollars ($2,000) per year in accordance with the provisions ofthat Program. F. Compensation for Overtime. Full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees shall have the option with Department Head approval to convert a maximum of eighty (80) hours oftime and one-half(T 1/2) paid overtime (in compensation for 53 1/3 overtime hours worked) to time and one-half ((T 1/2) compensatory time off benefits. Such compensatory time off shall be taken at the discretion of the employee when requested at least 72 hours in advance, subject to the operational needs and staffing requirements ofthe department. Ifthe Department Head or his or her designee subsequently denies the requested compensatory time off the employee and department will mutually agree on a future date within one year when the employee can use the paid compensatory time off. If the requested compensatory time off is not used within that one year, such compensatory overtime will be paid off in cash. G. Longevity Vacation Annual Accrual Cash-Out. Effective July 1,2005, each qualified full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employee will be permitted to cash-out up to forty (40) hours oftheir current year's longevity vacation accrual on a straight time basis. H. Bereavement Leave. Effective the date of adoption of this Resolution, a full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employee shall be granted up to twenty-four (24) hours leave without loss of pay in case of death of a member of the employee's immediate family. Such leave is designated as bereavement leave. "Immediate family" as used in this section is limited to: 1. Any member of the employee's household related by blood or marriage; 2. A parent, parent-in-law, spouse, child, brother, sister, grandparent or grandchild of the employee, regardless of residence; 3. Any other relative of the employee by blood or by marriage where it can be established by the employee that as a result of such relative's death, the employee's presence is required to handle funeral arrangements and/or matters of estate. 5 558-7 Whenever an employee is required to travel one way more than 500 miles to attend to the death of a member of the employee's immediate family, an employee may use up to sixteen (16) hours of additional leave charged to their Personal Necessity Leave balance when authorized by the Department Head. I. Health Insurance. Effective as soon as practicable after the date of adoption of this Resolution, the City shall contribute toward medical premiums for full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees an amount consistent with the rates then in effect for each tier of the CalPERS Kaiser Permanente HMO "Other Southern California" plan. Effective January 1, 2006, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2008, respectively, the City shall contribute toward medical premiums for full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees an amount consistent with the rates then in effect for each tier of the CalPERS Kaiser Permanente HMO "Other Southern California" plan. Any contribution necessary to maintain benefits under said health insurance plans in excess of the amount set forth above shall be borne entirely by the employee. J. Dental Insurance. Effective January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2005, the City will continue to contribute the current maximum of up to seventy dollars ($70) per month per full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employee toward the payment of premiums for dental insurance plans provided by the City for employees covered by this Resolution and their eligible dependents. Effective January 1,2006, the City contribution amount will be increased to a maximum of up to eighty dollars ($80) per month per employee. Effective January 1, 2007, the City contribution amount will be increased to a maximum of up to ninety dollars ($90) per month per employee. Any contribution necessary to maintain benefits under said dental plans in excess ofthe amount set forth above shall be borne entirely by the employee. K. Long Term Disabilitv (LTD) Insurance. As previously provided, the City shall continue to pay one hundred percent (100%) of the premium cost for coverage for full- time Unaffiliated Confidential employees under the same long-term disability insurance plan it maintains for management officers and employees of the City. L. Medical Retirement Subsidy Plan. Effective Fiscal Year 2004-05, the City's annual contribution to the Medical Retirement Subsidy Plan for full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees shall be increased by an additional one-half of one percent (0.5%) ofthe Unaffiliated Confidential employee salary base, under the same Medical Retirement Subsidy Plan it maintains for management officers and employees of the City. With this additional contribution amount, the City's maximum contribution toward the Medical Retirement Subsidy Plan for Unaffiliated Confidential employees 6 558-8 shall equal one percent (1 %) of their salary base. M. Vision Plan: As soon as practicable after the adoption ofthis Resolution, the City will implement a non-contributory Vision Plan through payroll deduction for full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees wishing to participate in such an "employee-paid" Plan. N. Parking. Unaffiliated Confidential employees shall not be subject to any requirements for parking based on seniority. O. Other Compensation Plan Changes. 1. General. Unless specified otherwise above, full-time Unaffiliated Confidential employees will be subject to the same compensation plan provisions, including, but not limited to, advancement and reduction in salary steps; bilingual pay; applicable assignment/incentive pay; overtime work; holidays; vacation, bereavement and other leaves of absence; longevity vacation cash- out; employee insurance, including medical, dental and life insurance; access to participate in City's Vision Plan; retirement; residency requirements; medical retirement subsidy plan; and work week schedule, as provided or as will be provided to full-time represented general service "miscellaneous" employees on or after July 1, 2004. 2. Z-Rating. A "Z-rate" is a special salary rate established by the City Manager which allows an Unaffiliated Confidential employee who has voluntarily demoted, or has been reclassified for non disciplinary reasons, to be paid at a rate of pay higher than that assigned to his or her reclassified position title for a specified transition time period." Section 4. That Section 13 of Resolution No. 82-11 0 Other Confidential Employee Rights and Privileges as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 13. Other Unaffiliated Confidential Employee Rights and Privileges. Each employee in a classification of employment designated in Section 3 of this Resolution as Unaffiliated Confidential (UC), shall continued to enjoy the same rights and privileges to which they were entitled as of June 30, 2004." Section 5: That except as amended by this Resolution, all other provisions of Resolution No. 82- 110, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6: That this Resolution shall be operative, unless specified otherwise above, from and after its date of adoption. 7 558-9 ADOPTED this day of ,2005. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2005-031 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 8 558-10 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 91-066 TO AMEND THE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR CERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT DESIGNATED AS UNREPRESENTED EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Section 1004, Article X of the City Charter ofthe City of Santa Ana requires the City Manager to prepare, install and maintain a position classification and pay plan subject to civil service rules and regulations and the approval of the City Council. B. On July 1, 1991, the City Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 91-066 re- establishing the Basic Classification and Compensation Plan for classes of employment designated as unrepresented Executive and Middle Management. C. The City Council has amended Resolution No. 91-066 on numerous occasions since its adoption. D. On December 17, 2001, the City Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 2001- 089 which amended Resolution No. 91-066 to provide that the salary rate for the unrepresented Executive Management classification of Fire Chief shall be increased to provide the same percentage increase as is provided to members of the Fire Management Association. E. The City of Santa Ana and the Santa Ana Management Association (SAMA) representing employees in classifications designated as represented Middle Management and Administrative Management, have negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to provide certain adjustments in salaries, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for SAMA represented employees during Fiscal Years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. F. With the adoption of this Memorandum of Understanding, it is the City's desire to: 1. With the exception ofthe classification of Fire Chief, adjust the base salaries assigned to unrepresented Executive Management classifications by the same percentage, on the same dates and in the same manner as provided SAMA represented management classifications, during the four year period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2008, as shown below: Resolution No. 2005-014 Page 1 of 6 558-11 July 1, 2004: 0% (No increase) July 1, 2005: 0% (No increase) July 1,2006: Minimum increase of3.5%, not to exceed 4.5% July 1, 2007: Minimum increase of3.5%, not to exceed 4.5% (* The maximum percentage amount ofthe salary increase in excess of3.5% shall be equal to the percentage increase received by the Santa Ana Police Officer's Association, not exceeding the maximum of 4.5%) 2. Continue to provide the unrepresented Executive Management classification of Fire Chiefwith the same percentage salary increase(s) as are or as will be provided to members of the Fire Management Association. 3. Except as provided in Resolution No. 91-066, and as provided in subsequent amendments thereto, continue to treat unrepresented Executive Management classifications as subject to the same basic classification and compensation plan provisions and their application as SAMA represented classifications assigned to a 15-step salary rate range. 4. Continue to provided unrepresented Executive Management and Middle Management officers and employees with the same retirement, health and other benefit adjustments, based on similar conditions, as provided to SAMA represented management employees, and continue to provide unrepresented Executive Management officers employees with several benefits not provided SAMA represented management employees. G. It is now desired to amend Council Resolution No. 91-066 to effect these objectives. Section 2. That Resolution No. 91-066, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: A. That Section 2. Schedule of Salaries, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 2. Schedule of Salaries. "A. Two separate schedules showing salary rate ranges for classifications of employment designated as unrepresented Executive Management (EM) and unrepresented Middle Management (MM), are attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein. The schedule for unrepresented Executive Management classifications and unrepresented Middle Management classifications, and their respective effective dates are listed as follows: Resolution No. 2005-014 Page 2 of 6 558-12 Salary Schedule Unrepresented Cate20rv of Emplovment No. Effective Date Executive Management (EM) EM-05 EM -06 EM -07 EM -08 7/1/04 7/1/05 7/1/06 * 7/1/07 ** Middle Management (MM) MM-05 MM-06 MM-07 MM-08 7/1/04 7/1/05 7/1/06 * 7/1/07 ** * Effective July 1, 2006, the salary matrices showing monthly pay ranges and steps in effect on June 30, 2006 assigned to classifications of employment designated as unrepresented Executive Management (EM) and unrepresented Middle Management (MM) will be increased by no less than three and one-half percent (3.5%) and by no more than four and one-half percent (4.5%), and equal to the percentage increase as that provided for classifications represented by SAMA. The resulting new salary matrices will be developed as set forth above and will be shown as Salary Schedules EM-07 and MM-07. * * Effective July 1, 2007, the salary matrices showing monthly pay ranges and steps in effect on June 30, 2007 assigned to classifications of employment designated as unrepresented Executive Management (EM) and unrepresented Middle Management (MM) will be increased by no less than three and one-half percent (3.5%), and by no more than four and one-half percent (4.5%), and equal to the percentage increase as that provided for classifications represented by SAMA. The resulting new salary matrices will be developed as set forth above and will be shown as Salary Schedules EM-08 and MM-08." "B. Each unrepresented Executive and Middle Management salary schedule contains numerous salary rate ranges, each range comprised of fifteen (15) separate rates of pay shown in monthly amounts. The respective rate ranges are identified by a two- digit number preceded by the capital letters "EM" for Executive Management and "MM" for Middle management. The separate rates of payor steps within each salary rate range are identified by the numbers "I" through "15" inclusive, with Step "I" being the lowest or minimum rate ofthe range, Step "8" the middle or midpoint rate of the range, and Step' "15" being the highest or maximum rate." B. That Section 3A. Designation of Management Classifications and Assignment of such Classifications to Salary Rate Ranges shall be amended to read as follows: "A. Unrepresented Executive Management Classifications 558-13 Resolution No. 2005-014 Page 3 of 6 Classification Title 15 Step Salary Rate Range Effective 7/1/04 through 6/30/05 Assistant City Manager (EM) Executive Director of Community Development (EM) Executive Director, External Affairs (EM) Executive Director of Finance and Management Services (EM) Executive Director of Personnel Services (EM) Executive Director of Planning and Building (EM) Executive Director of Public Works (EM) Executive Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services (EM) Library Director (EM) Fire Chief (EM) Police Chief (EM) EM -37 EM -31 EM -24 EM-32 EM - 30 EM -37 EM-33 EM - 31 EM-28 EM-34* EM - 38 * Note: Effective July 1, 2002, and in future years, the salary rate for the classification of Fire Chief shall be increased to provide the same percentage increase, on the same effective date, as is provided to members of the Fire Management Association." C. That Section 4. Special Salary Compensation Provisions as amended, shall be further amended to read as follows: "Section 4. Special Compensation Plan Provisions. 4.1 Bilingual Skill Pay. Qualified employees who are assigned to positions involving the regular and frequent use of bilingual skill in both English and either Spanish, Vietnamese or other language designated by the City Manager will be paid a monthly pay differential of forty dollars ($40) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. Incumbents of positions where bilingual proficiency is essential to the performance of duties and responsibilities of a critical and/or emergency nature, or of positions where bilingual public contact is a major, essential or integral element ofthe work being performed, will be paid a monthly differential of one hundred seventy- five dollars ($175) above his or her then current base monthly salary step." 4.2. Terminal Classifications. The capitalized letter "T" shown within parenthesis [i.e, (T)] next to a classification title signifies a position classification that has been designated as "terminal" by formal City Council action and, as such, will be deleted from this classification and compensation plan for unrepresented Executive and Middle-Management classifications of employment when vacated by its last remaining incumbent. No new appointment may be made to a classification that has been designated as terminal. 4.3 Compensation Plan Changes for Unrepresented Executive Management and Resolution No. 2005-014 Page 4 of 6 558-14 Middle Management Classifications. Unless specified otherwise herein, unrepresented Executive Management and Middle Management officers and employees will be subject to the same changes in compensation plan provisions, including but not limited to, bilingual pay; sick leave maximum accrual; bereavement leave; holidays; longevity vacation cash out; medical and dental insurance; access to participate in City's Vision Plan; retirement; residency requirements; medical retirement subsidy plan; and work week schedule, as provided or will be provided to SAMA represented Middle Management employees assigned to a 15-step salary rate range on or after July 1,2004." D. That a new Section 8 shall be added to read as follows: "Section 8. Other Unrepresented Executive Management and Employee Rights and Privileges. Each employee in a classification of employment designated in Section 3A of this Resolution as unrepresented Executive Management (EM), shall continue to enjoy the same rights and privileges to which they were entitled as of June 30, 2004." Section 3. That except as amended by this Resolution, all other provisions of Resolution No. 91- 066, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be operative, unless specified otherwise above, from and after its date of adoption. Resolution No. 2005-014 Page 5 of 6 558-15 ADOPTED this day of ,2005. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2005-033 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council ofthe City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2005-014 Page 6 of 6 558-16 ~ o -.. '<'""" o -Or::: Q)Q) c.~ ~o Q)Q) .....:t::: e..w Q) -- ..... c- :J~ oE - >. (/)0 Q)- O')e.. cE ctlW 0::- LOQ)O o-(/) I ctl Q) ~o::~ LU ~ ctl ctlU ctl_ CI)~ bE Q)~ -Ectl Q)c ..ectl u~ Cl)Q) > :;::::; ::) u Q) >< w ~~ '~~'-OO<.o<.o~'N~~C")<.o-oo~C")<.oI.{'),<,"""",,"C")O<.oooO)<.oC") v,,",'<'"""~,,~~ ,~ ~O)"""O<.OC")'<'"""O)OOOOOOO),<,""",,,,"OO 1.{')<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""~O)NI.{')~OC")l.{')oo,<,""""""~'<'""",,,,"~ ~0~R~~~~g~~~~~~~0)0)000~~~~~~~C")C")C") I.{')N"""OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o",,"oo~C")<.oI.{'),<,""",,,,"C")O<.oooO)<.o -~~~O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo 1.{')00"""o<.oC")'<'"""0)0000000)'<'""",,,," ~ '<'""" O)NI.{')~OC")l.{')oo'<'""""""~'<'""",,,," '<'"""~~0~R~~~~g~~~~~~~~0)000~~~~~~~C")C") 000)C") I.{')N-OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o"""oo~C")<.oI.{'),<,""",,,,"C")O '<'""" '<'""" ~ 1.{')00",,"o<.oC")'<'"""0)0000 C")l.{')o<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""~O)NI.{')~OC")l.{')oo,<,""" ~~~0~R~~~~g~~~~~~~0)0)000~~~~~ <.0 00 0) 00 0) '<'""" """~'<'""" NNC") '<'""" '<'""" '<'""" o OOO)C") I.{')N"""OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o",,"oo~C")<.oI.{'),<,""",,,,"C")O<.ooo '<'""" '<'""" 1.{')00",,"o<.oC")'<'"""0)0000000) ~~~~~~~b~~~ro8~;~~~~~~O)NI.{')~~~~~,<,"""",,"~ <.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)O)ooo,<,""",<,""",<,""",<,"""~~~ 00 OOO)C") 1.{')~'-OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o-oo~C")<.oI.{'),<,""" '<'""" '<'""" ,~~ ~O)",,"o<.oC"),<,""" ~~~~~~~~b~~~ro8~;~~~~~~O)NI.{')~~~ 1.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)O)ooo,<,""",<,""" ",,"C")O<.o 0) 00 00 00 I.{')OO,<,"""",," '<'"""'<'"""NN ~ ~ ~ ~ 01.{')00'<'"""000)C")O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~g OI.{')Ol.{')o<.oC")o)ON"""<.oooON,,,,"<.oooONI.{')~O)NI.{')~OC")l.{')oo'<'""" ~~~~~~0<.o~~~~~00000000000)0)0)0)0)000~~~~~ C")1.{')00'<'"""000)C")O~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~8~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~R~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~b~E~~ -C")I.{')OO'<'"""ooO)C"),<,"""I.{')N"""OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o",,"oo~C")<.oI.{'),<,""",,,," ooN<.oOI.{')OI.{')O<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""I.{')O)",,"O<.oC")'<'"""O) OI.{')<.oooo)'<'"""N"""I.{')~o)ON",,"<.oooON,,,,"<.oooONI.{')~O)NI.{')~OC")1.{') 1.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)O)ooo~~~ O)"""C")I.{')OO'<'"""ooO)C"),<,"""I.{')N",,"OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o,,,,"oo~C")<.oI.{'),<,""" ~ooN<.oOI.{')OI.{')O<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""I.{')O)",,"O<.oC")'<'""" OC")I.{')<.oooo)'<'"""N"""I.{')~o)ON",,"<.oooON,,,,"<.oooONI.{')~O)NI.{')~OC") 1.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)O)ooo~~ ~O)"""C")I.{')OO'<'"""ooO)C"),<,"""I.{')N",,"OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o,,,,"oo~ <.ol.{')ooN<.oOI.{')OI.{')O<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""I.{')O)",," ONC")I.{')<.oooo)'<'"""N"""I.{')~o)ON",,"<.oooON,,,,"<.oooONI.{')~O)N 1.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)O)O C")<.ol.{') o <.0 C") I.{') ~ 0 00'<'""" '<'""" '<'""" '<'""" O)~O)"""C")I.{')OO'<'"""ooO)C"),<,"""I.{')N",,"OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o,,,,"oo~C")<.o I.{')Nl.{')ooN<.oOI.{')OI.{')O<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""I.{')O)",,"O<.o O'<'"""NC")I.{')<.oooo)'<'"""N"""I.{')~o)ON",,"<.oooON,,,,"<.oooONI.{')~O)NI.{')~ 1.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)O)OOO C")O)~O)"""C")I.{')OO'<'"""ooO)C"),<,"""I.{')N",,"OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o,,,,"oo~C") """ONl.{')ooN<.oOI.{')OI.{')O<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""I.{')O),,,,"O OO'<'"""NC")I.{')<.oooo)'<'"""N"""I.{')~o)ON",,"<.oooON,,,,"<.oOOONI.{')~mNI.{') 1.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)mOO NC")O)~O)"""C")I.{')OO'<'"""ooO)C"),<,"""I.{')N",,"OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o,,,,"oo~ C")ooONl.{')ooN<.oOI.{')OI.{')O<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""I.{')O)",," OooO'<'"""NC")I.{')<.oooo)'<'"""N"""I.{')~o)ON",,"<.oooON,,,,"<.oooONI.{')~O)N ",,"I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)O)O NNC")O)~O)"""C")I.{')OO'<'"""ooO)C"),<,"""I.{')N",,"OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o,,,,"oo N<.oooONl.{')ooN<.oOI.{')OI.{')O<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""I.{')O) O~OOO'<'"""NC")I.{')<.ooom'<'"""N"""I.{')~o)ON",,"<.oooON,,,,"<.oOOONI.{')~O) """,,,,"I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O)O) ~NNC")O)~O)"""C")I.{')OO'<'"""ooO)C"),<,"""I.{')N",,"OO<.o<.oNN~~C")<.o,,,," '<'"""",,"<.oooONl.{')ooN<.oOI.{')OI.{')O<.oC")O~I.{')C")N'<'"""OO'<'"""NC")l.{')oo'<'"""l.{') O<.o~OOO'<'"""NC")I.{')<.oooo)'<'"""N"""I.{')~o)ON",,"<.oooON,,,,"<.oooONI.{')~ """",,",,,,"I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')I.{')<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o<.o~~~~~ooooooooooO)O)O)O) O'<'"""NC")",,"I.{')<.o~ooO)O NC")",,"I.{')<.o~ooO)o NC")",,"I.{')<.o~ooO)o '<'"""'<'""" '<'""" NNNNNNNNNNC")C")C")C")C")C")C")C")C")C")",," I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww 558-17 ~ o -- ...-- "'00 0)-- +-- ....... C 0) ~ > ~U Cl.0) O)~ .....w c--..- :J ..... +-- o C '+- 0) l/) E 0) >. 0'>0 a5 Cl. L{)c::E oO)~ ~roo ':::::C::l/) ~ ~ ~ CO l/) - CO co- enu '+- +-- o C 0) 0) "S E "'0 0) 0) 0'> .c CO u C en CO ~ I 0) "'0 :g ~ N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~ ~~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN ~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmO ~oo~~MN~oooo~mNM ~~oo~~MNM~~oo~~~ ~~mN~oo~~~OM~O~ OOO~~~NNNMMM~~ or- ,-,-,-,- .,.-,-,.- ~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~~oo~~MN~oooo~mN ~O~~oo~~MNM~~oo~~ ~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~mN~~mN~oo~~~OM~O ~~~R~~~~Roo~~~~~~~moOOO~~~N~~MMM~ N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMO~O~~~~~~~g~~~~ M~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~mN~~mN~oo~~~OM~ ~~~R~~~~Roo~~~~~~~moo~O~~~~~NMMM ~N~N~~N~~ m~M~~NMOM~~oo~ ~ ~O~~OO Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~mN~~m ~~~~R~~~~Roo~~~~~~~moo~o ~MN~OOoo~ ~~MNM~~oo N~oo~~~OM ~~~NNNMM or- ,.- or- or- ,- ~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~~oo ~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O~~ ~NM~~ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmOOO ~~MN~ oo~~MN mN~oo~ O,.-,.-,-N ,.- ,.- ,.- ,.- 0000 M~ ~ ~~O NNM ~ ~ N~N~ N~~~m-M~~NMOM~~oo~~MN~OO o~~~~o~~~ooo~~~~oom~~~~~O~~oo~~MNM~ ~Noo~~oooN~~~m M~~ON~ mN~~mN~oo~~~ g~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommm~mOOOO~~~N~~ ~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~ mN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O omONM~~ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN ~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmO ~oo~~ ~~oo~ ~~mN OOO~ ~ M N ~O ~MNM ~oo~~ ~~NN ~ ~ ~~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~~ ooooN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O~ o~mONM~~ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmOO 00 ~ ~ 00 ~m 00 ~ ~ ~ MN ~ ~~MN N~oo~ ,-,.-.,-N ,.- ,.- ,.- ,.- ~~~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~~oo~ ~O~~OO ~~ooN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~mN~~m o~~~g~~~~~R~~~~Roo~~~~~~~moooo ~MN ~~ M N~oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~~oo~ ~O~ooN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O~~oo o~~~mONM~~ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN~~m ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmO~OO ~ M ~~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~~~~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~ ~~O~ooN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O OM~~~mONM~~ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmO ~oo~~ ~~oo~ ~~mN o 0 o~ ~ ooO~~~~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~~oo~ ~M~O~ooN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom ~~ ~O~~OO ~N~~mN~~m o~~~~~~g~~~~~R~~~~Roo~~~~mm~moooo ~ooO~~~~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~~oo M~M~O~ooN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O~~ O~NM~~~mONM~~ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmOOO ~~ooO~~~~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~~ Noo~M~O~ooN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O~ om~NM~~~mONM~~ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmOO ~~~ooO~~~~~~~N~N~~N~~~m~M~~NMOM~ ~~oo~M~O~ooN~Noo~O~~NOoo~~~~oom~~~~~O ooom~NM~~~mONM~~ooON~~~m~M~~ON~~mN ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooommmmmO O~NM~~~~oomo NM~~~~oomo NM~~~~oomo ~~ ~~~ ~~NNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMMMMM~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 558-18 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~~!~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: SEPTEMBER 20, 2004 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL NO. 2004-07 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1905 NORTH VALENCIA STREET c ' , '.- /" . / "T~ '. / / ~Pif2 . CITY MANAGER APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For CONTINUERtP uO d~( \I-\S-O't)~ d -d':> - C ~ I 3-~l-O FILE NUMBER J J j7 RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Deny Appeal No. 2004-07. 2. Adopt a resolution approving Application No. 2004-05. Historic Resources Commission 3. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Register Categorization No. 2004-05. HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION ACTION Adopted a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2004-05 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2004-05 to place and categorize as Key at its August 5, 2004 meeting (Exhibit A) by a vote of 6:0 (Bustamante, Lutz, Shaefer absent) . DISCUSSION Request of Applicant Mrs. Ruth Kroll, the owner of the F. B. Elliott House, is appealing the placement and categorization of this structure on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2004-05 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2004-05). Mrs. Kroll submitted a letter of appeal (Exhibit B) on August 11, 2004 stating her reasons for declining the register listing. The request to appeal the Historic Resources Commission decision is based on: (1) current and future property restriction for historic structures and (2) respect for her property rights. 75A-1 Appeal No. 2004-07 September 20, 2004 Page 2 Analysis of the Issues A Park Santiago resource survey, conducted by architectural historian Leslie Heumann, identified 20 significant historical properties in the Park Santiago neighborhood as candidates for placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The subject structure located at 1905 North Valencia Street was included as a candidate as it meets the minimum selection criteria for inclusion on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. It is over 50 years old and exemplifies the Bungalow/Craftsman architectural style. The one-story structure, built circa 1912, is eligible to be categorized as Key for its distinctive architectural style as illustrated by its side gabled roof with exposed structural elements; sheathing in shingle courses of alternating heights; and horizontal emphasis. Prior to the City initiating the placement of this structure on the Register, courtesy letters were mailed on December 16, 2003 to the affected property owners inviting them to attend a special presentation explaining the implications and benefits of being placed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Following the presentation, staff contacted the property owner by phone to discuss any concerns or questions the owner had regarding the proposed historic designation. At that time, Mrs. Kroll expressed her opposition to her property being placed on the local historic list. On February 5, 2004, Mrs. Kroll submitted correspondence to the Historic Resources Commission further expressing her opposition to placing the structure on the local Historic Register. Based on the architectural significance of the house, on August 5, 2004 the Commission approved the placement of the F. B. Elliott House on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties and categorized it as Key. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council uphold the decision of the Historic Resources Commission and adopt the resolutions approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2004-05 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2004-05. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review. A Categorical Exemption will be filed for this project. 75A-2 Appeal No. 2004-07 September 20, 2004 Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. --I Ste hen G. Hard fug Executive Director Planning & Building Agency MGM:rb Mgm:Historic\Appeal\190SValencia.cc 75A-3 REQUEST FOR Historic Resources Commission Action ~ ~ HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION SECRETARY HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION MEE'T'NG DATE: AUGUST 5, 2004 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2004-05 AND HISTORIC REGISTER CATEGORIZATION NO. 2004-05 TO RECONSIDER PLACEMENT AND CATEGORIZATION Prepared by Melanie G. McCann APPROVED D As Recommended D As Amended D Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO ~ ~~':dDirector ~ing Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Move to reconsider the placement and categorization of the structure at 1905 North Valencia Street (F.B. Elliot House) . 2. Adopt a resolution approving Application No. 2004-05. Historic Resources Commission 3. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Register Categorization No. 2004-05. DISCUSSION Request of Applicant The property owner, Mrs. Clarence Kroll, requests reconsideration of the placement and categorization of the property located at 1905 North Valencia Street as Key on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Background This action was first presented to the Historic Resources Commission at the public hearing held February 5, 2004. Upon written request by some of the property owners, the item was continued for three months to allow the owners additional time to study the ramification of placement on the local historic register. As communicated in the correspondence provided to the Commission at the February public hearing, the owners of 1905 North Valencia Street were not in favor of placing their property on the local historic register (Exhibit 1). EXHIBIT A 75A-4 HRCA No. 2004-05 HRC No. 2004-05 August 5, 2004 Page 2 The Historic Resources Commission rescheduled the subj ect property for action on May 6, 2004. The property owners were not present at that Commission hearing and did not respond to staff's attempt to reach them by phone prior to the public hearing. On May 6, 2004, the Historic Resources Commission placed the F.B. Elliot House on the local register and categorized it as Key. Following action by the Historic Resources Commission, a courtesy letter was sent to the property owner to communicate the Commission's action on their property and inform them of the 10-day appeal period. Unfortunately, in error the courtesy letter was sent to the subj ect rental property instead of Mrs. Kroll's home address. Thus, Mrs. Kroll did not contact the City about her property's listing status until after the 10-day appeal period was closed. Mrs. Kroll is requesting her property be removed from the Register due to concerns with current and future restrictions on her property. Analysis of the Issues The F.B. Elliot House meets the minimum selection criteria for inclusion on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to criteria contained in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The first benchmark for selection requires that the structure be 50 or more years old. As detailed in the property description, the structure proposed for placement on the Register meets the minimum age criteria. Based on the results of research, the structure at 1905 North Valencia Street meets the criteria to be placed in the Key category as contained in Section 30-2.2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The code criteria for Key designation are as follows: a. The building, landmark or district architectural style and quality; or has a distinctive b. The building, landmark or district is characteristic of a significant period in the history of the City of Santa Ana; or c. The building, landmark or district is associated with a significant person or event in the City of Santa Ana. 75A-5 HRCA No. 2004-05 HRC No. 2004-05 August 5, 2004 Page 3 The F.B. Elliot House, built circa 1912, qualifies for listing on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as a representative example of Bunglow/Craftman style architecture (Exhibit 2). The structure is eligible to be placed within the Key category for its distinctive architectural style and quality as illustrated by its side gabled roof wi th rafters exposed at the eaves; sheathing in shingle courses of alternating heights; a recessed porch featuring a brick wall and pedestals spanning most of the fac;ade ; massive brick piers marking the end of the porch; and a series of casement windows featured in the front facade. Based on findings consistent with the criteria established of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, it is recommended that Resources Commission approve the actions as noted. A correspondence log is attached for your review (Exhibit 3). in Chapter 30 the Historic case planner CEQA Compliance In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review. A Categorical Exemption has been filed for this project. ~-I-~ .' 7/1:uJ~7 M~d2/l Maya DeR6sa Senior Planner Melanie G. McCann, AICP Associate Planner MGM:JM mgm\Historic\Aug2004\Elliot.080504.hrc 75A-6 :;<- 6--0 i -(f~ i I/(, ':/- ~ - // /1-/ #~ - . ~I 0-1 ~~if.:rd/ {~~ Vt.._.,. <--[./j /l-/cr)..?-ntJ,A..-'(. <r/ rv'" -r; ~/ / .~ ''1 . /i .. r-;, '-7' /.....J/? eX c:2 ~t4e- ~/rl..-!.~/t..; -U~C1V .~~ ~~ Clv 9;17tJ 2 77~~ ~ of ft/ie,~ ~~Ad i. 1'100 ~~ ;:;&~A!l:j~l;ia~ l/:itVu A67-~.z ~;;Ik--~ Oyt c: -s- -d ~...4--7" 5f;,41, J/~~:#r ~h i~Vz r~ .;/~ ~ CTYL..~ -f!-c;vL~ fQe'J&tVL-<:~ ~)?-U.~ ~~~ #02c'~7"- c7.j- C'~ ~7"z,'e.. liL;~ -C-~~'L>-1/;:""" '1-tP-"S r~ ;/:u~!r~ I /~d xi ~~'f:i ~}f~ EXHIBIT 1 75A-7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY F. B. ELLIOTT HOUSE 1905 North Valencia Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME F. B. Elliott House I REF. NO. ADDRESS 1905 North Valencia Street CITY Santa Ana ZIP I 92706 I ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT Circa 1912 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Key HISTORIC DISTRICT I N/A NEIGHBORHOOD I Park Santiago CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EV ALUA TION 13 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 15S3 Location: 0 Not for Publication [gI Unrestricted o Prehistoric [gI Historic o Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Bungalow/Craftsman Closely related to the English Arts and Crafts Movement, American Craftsman architecture was popularized by The Craftsman magazine and architects such as Charles and Henry Greene of Pasadena. It drew from the wood building traditions of Japan and Switzerland as well as the medieval themes favored by the Arts and Crafts philosophers. Craftsman architecture stressed honesty of form, materials, and workmanship, eschewing applied decoration in favor of the straightforward expression of structure. A new appreciation of nature was evident in horizontal lines that reached out to embrace the landscape and the incorporation of capacious porches into building plans. Primarily a residential style, Craftsman architecture can be identified by low pitched gable and hipped roofs with exposed rafters and beams in deep overhangs; wood lap or shingle siding and an occasional use of stucco; extensive use of stone or brick as a secondary material; horizontal emphasis apparent in rooflines, headers, and battered porch supports; and broadly proportioned wood framed windows, often clustered in bands. Craftsman homes were built from circa 1902 until the early 1920s. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The F. B. Elliott House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its representation of the distinguishing characteristics of the Craftsman style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it "has a distinctive architectural style and quality" as an example of a Craftsman bungalow (Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: · California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4,2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. EXHIBIT 2 pa1~a-8 Primary # HRI# State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Date Page -L of -1- P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: DNot for Publication -Unrestricted *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 *c. Address 1905 Norlh Valencia Street *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 1 05 FT F. B. Elliott House *a. County Orange County Date: City Santa Ana Zip 92706 003-164-18; RESUB OF NaB HILL TR LOT 17 BLK G N 55 FT S *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) This one-story bungalow showcases the Craftsman style. Capped with a side gable roof with rafters exposed in the eaves, the building is sheathed in shingle courses of alternating heights. A sill course circles the building, below which, wide clapboard covers the exterior walls. Spanning most of the fagade, a recessed porch features brick walls and pedestals. Massive brick piers mark the ends of the porch, while four wooden posts flank each side of the central entry. Each of the porch supporls is topped by a capital composed of shaped pieces of wood that meet at ninety-degree angles. The central entry consists of an oak door flanked by sidelights. Three identical casement windows define the south bay. On the norlh, a triparlite window features a large, fixed, central pane with narrow flanking casements and a multi-light transom. A brick chimney is attached to the norlh elevation. The house is set a few feet above street level, and is approached by a broad flight of concrete stairs that lead up from the curb to a concrete pathway. Two palm trees in the parkway frame the house, which appears to be unaltered. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single-family Properly *P4. Resources Present: -Building OStructure OObject OSite ODistrict -Element of District OOther P5a. Photo *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None. P5b. Photo: (view and date) Norlh and west elevations December 2003 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: -historic Circa 1912 *P7. Owner and Address: Clarence H. Kroll 1229 E. Lomita California, CA 92867 *P8. Recorded by: Leslie J. Heumann SAIC 35 S. Raymond Ave. # 204 Pasadena, CA 91105 *P9. Date Recorded: December 31,2003 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *Attachments: DNone DLocation Map DSketch Map -Continuation Sheet -Building, Structure, and Object Record OArchaeological Record ODistrict Record DLinear Feature Record OMilling Station Record DRock Art Record OArtifact Record DPhotograph Record 0 Other (list) DPR 523A (1/95) 75J{:~f4 *Required information State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page -L of -1- *CHR Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: F. B. Elliott House B1. Historic Name: F. B. Elliott House B2. Common Name: Same B3. Original Use: Single-family Residence B4. Present Use: Single-family Residence *85. Architectural Style: Bungalow/Craftsman *86. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): Constructed circa 1912. November 21, 1936. Reroof *87. Moved? -No DYes DUnknown Date: *88. Related Features: Original Location: Concrete steps and walkway. B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *810. Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: circa 1901-1954 Property Type: Single-family Residence Applicable Criteria: NR: C; CR: 3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The F. B. Elliott House is architecturally significant as a highly representative example of a Craftsman bungalow from the first quarler of the twentieth century. On the basis of its styling and the listings in the city directories, it appears that the house was built circa 1912. The first listing occurred in 1913-1914, when Floyd Elliott, an employee of the Griffith Lumber Company, located at 1022 East Fourlh Street and managed by A. C. Bowers, was the owner. By 1918, Elliott had married and left the lumberyard in favor of a position as a salesman for Carl C. Crawford, the Orange County agent for Oldsmobiles. Two years later, William R. Gordon, an employee of the Charles Davis Garage, and his wife Estelle were the occupants. They were followed in 1924 by William J. Hales, a horse and mule dealer, and his wife Calla. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) *812. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: Sketch Map *814. Evaluator: Leslie J. Heumann F.B. Elliot House 1905 North Valencia Street *Date of Evaluation: December 31,2003 t- AiLEY I DPR 5238 (1/95) r-: \4 information --1 SUB. 17 I (This space reserved for official comments.) 1 ~@ @ @ ~ ~@ @ I 0 \ t't 1-.- ... 7 5A~31() State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page -1- of -1- Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) F. B. Elliott House *Recorded by Leslie J. Heumann, SAIC *Date December 31,2003 [8] Continuation 0 Update *810. Significance (continued): The F. B. Elliott House is located in the Park Santiago neighborhood, near the present norlhern city limits of Santa Ana and substantially norlh of the original city core. The neighborhood is bounded by Santiago Creek and Park on the nOrlh, East Seventeenth Street on the south, Norlh Lincoln Avenue on the east, Norlh Main Street on the west, and the 1-5 freeway on the southwest. In large parl these boundaries reflect the transporlation lines that were constructed towards the end of the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth century, when the Pacific Electric interurban railroad ran up Main Street; the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe tracks followed Lincoln; and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way mirrored the freeway route. This area remained primarily agricultural well into the 1920s. As of 1905, the city directories listed around twenty households on East Santa Clara, Twentieth Street, "C Street" (now Norlh Santiago Street), Norlh Bush Street and Norlh Main Avenue, the only streets in the area at the time. The vast majority of the residents were ranchers. By 1911, the number of households had increased to about thirly, and Edgewood Road and Valencia Street had been parlially laid out, but most residents continued to list "rancher" or "fruit grower" as their occupation in the city directories. This pattern of land use was evident on the 1912 plat map of the City, which illustrated two small, Craftsman era subdivisions along Bush norlh of Santa Clara and on Valencia and Poinsettia south of Twentieth Street, with the remaining area divided into larger, agricultural parcels held by approximately forly landowners. While the area east of Santiago Street was not subdivided until after the mid-1920s, most of the present day streets west of Santiago had been laid out when the City was mapped in 1923. Ranching continued to be the most prevalent occupation in the neighborhood, but increasing numbers of professionals, small business owners, merchants, and people in service professions such as painters, electricians, and carpenters made their homes in the western half of the neighborhood during the 1920s and 1930s. The area also attracted several city and county officials, including the City Attorney (z. B. West, Jr., 321 East Santa Clara Avenue), County Supervisor, First District (C. H. Chapman, 2315 Norlh Santiago Street), County Surveyor (E. H. Irwin, 2407 Norlh Santiago Street), and County Auditor (William C. Jerome, 2422 Poinsettia Street). By April 1 942, when the Sanborn Company first mapped the western half of the area, most of the lots had been improved with single-family homes, many in the revival styles popular during the 1920s and 1930s. Subsequent development of the eastern half of the neighborhood and infill construction in the western half displayed the simplified ranch style that emerged following World War II. The F. B. Elliott House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properlies under Criterion 1, for its representation of the distinguishing characteristics of the Craftsman style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it "has a distinctive architectural style and quality" as an example of a Craftsman bungalow. Characteristic Craftsman features include the strongly horizontal massing and design, keynoted by the roofline and siding, the combination of wood and brick, and the exposed structural elements such as rafter tails and column capitals. Character-defining exterior features of the F. B. Elliott House that should be preserved include, but may not be limited to: sheathing (shingles and clapboard); roof configuration and detailing; massing; windows and doors; porch; architectural details (posts, piers, brackets, attic vents); chimney; and concrete steps and walkway. *812. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated EncvcloDedia. New York, WW Norlon, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana. An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form. " Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources." Sacramento: March 1995. Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-1930. Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 1912, 1923, 1932, and 1955. DPR 523L j5A~11 HRC Case Planner Log Sheet HRC Public Hearing August 5, 2004 Address Courtesy Phone Follow Phone Notice Info Letter Call* Up Ltr Call Card Letter (if no ph #) 1905 North Valencia Street 12/16/03 12/30/03 1/7/04 1/23/004 1/23/04 2/5/04 3/2/04 3/23/04 5/17/04 7/16/04 · Generally occurs one week following courtesy letter EXHIBIT 3 MGMlhistoric/ Aug2004/Logsheet20 I Birch 75A-12 ....... -, RECEIVED AUG 1 1 2004 SANTA ANA PLANNING DEft Planning and Building Agency Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 (M-20) Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 647-5804 ... ... .....l........... .... ....... .l .I .. ... ... APPEAL APPLICATION ......................... ...l ........ ...t... .. . . .. ... ......... I. OWNER/APPLICANT Applicant R UTI-f- S, -k: R.o L L Full name of Person. Firm, or Corporation 12..'2-q F? Lom If A Ave I (JRANfMS- <7/tf) 33~ -L4-4-q Mailing Address / ~ I Area Code Phone No. ' Legal Owner Name: K'ROLL- FA:.m/L'i \ R~S1 Legal Owner Address: /2.2-0( E, Lo m 1 T 11 ItV E J ()~PrfJ0F-; 0. A 12ft, 7 Phone No.: <7Lq) CJ,~ ~ -/lflL9 < )s~ Fax: < ) ,() /A I II. PROPERTY INFORMATION Land Use 3FR-. RSsr:DEtUc..E.... SP - 'f 0 j, ~ .,.. 7 Existing Land Use of Property and/or Buildi~ Zonin~ District General Plan Designation fQ05 VftLEfdC./f'r SAnTA AUA: ;;(O~ ST~.:e.eT Street Address Name of Nearest Intersecting Street Location SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS III. REASON FOR REQUEST In the following, provided space, please clearly specify and explain the error(s) of decision or requirement upon which you are basing this appeal. (If additional space is needed, please attach additional comments to the back of this application.) ~AR I Y O.AI T WACJt~ A PClte. 5;~i11l7 AOll) 6(1111.M Y h()r~A/d -+-- T felT A boUT The H,S" lor u. RE'(j 1.5I-ER, if :'JtJO 4 -6" A#d F )'p~ t r .te d Th~r we dId N aT WAI1I1" 10 be u,vd e v- Jbe Pesf11C t(~S crt The.. ~ ~ H/5/orl c. Re 'liS te. "" 4 J hA-VP h eo". J Th 0..1 r he r@ 'tV e ~E ~(h erS' ThAt de.cf\!lIE-d The PrtfJec T /AI The IY'eA-R hOC(".:I. 1(",AJ dfouf'L .hC)U5p -/-Thf'rP "P.Iy-hT<; WeY'e ReSfec./ed, 1- did /VoT A-TleA/d {he jSf-t-1,vjMee..tIN7b&A-u.c;e /Uy hu~hl1.A/d W-4-~Yery ILl,... @vel( ~A'1d ~ Applicant's Signature: . , ~ APPEAL APPLICATION NO. .:..... i, Date: <6.... c;- 0 i 2-0Ql.1 - Dl cmlcntr-frm\appeal 5/00 EXHIBIT B 1 of 2 75A-13 ~ .. ~ . . : ~ -: ~,'-: J . '. . . . . . . - . ~ I w,j,.S.A--r hu-hd-5...L.Je o,3hr.sA d.4.V-AA-Icl SINce t.F XDye:s~ed >. . , - ~ I . :,. l!)c..l ~ +eeJllI/y JAI.uJRIT1AJ<f ~.~T sbcJ uLrI hA-vebee>> h"M::ir~d<:.:.: vJ e.. h A- vf" 4 i.. Ld~y Fe 1 r 'Y' e V' Y s f~a A/ <;" A 1)(::)u"1 \'f~{J De1"7~ R, ~J...t$ '/ ; I I ~' W€-A-/'lIJAyr h4-lle ~LT T/"^l (J)Th er...$ DEel dI.A.JC, wl1/.l.7 f sbe.c;.T I Sll' N Tit 'e f? o~d -,;d fS t'rrry I ~ 'i (!) U It R,~ J. T <; k5 'I'no fP .,... ~v ~~.t:.S I ld...'(hJ<:>bA-/,/J hA5-(M~~u?.lJY '.MA-,v./~~eJ-'j~~~_~~_,: - , I \ \ i l I 2of2 75A-14 EXEMPT FROM FEES PURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE S 6103 KO - 3/15/05 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PLACING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1905 NORTH VALENCIA STREET ON THE HISTORICAL REGISTER, HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2004-05, AND PLACING WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED CATEGORY HISTORIC REGISTER CATEGORIZATION NO. 2004-05 (APPEAL NO. 2004-07) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On February 5, 2004, the Historic Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, and at that hearing this matter was continued for 90 days to permit the property owner time to evaluate the placement on the Historic Register. 1. On May 6, 2004 the Historic Resources Commission held the continued public hearing and by a unanimous vote, approved the placement of the F.B. Elliot House, located at 1905 North Valencia Street, Santa Ana, on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties and categorized the property as Key. 2. At the property owner's request, on August 5, 2004, the Historic Resources Commission reconsidered the placement and categorization of the property. The Historic Resources Commission held the duly noticed public hearing on Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2004-05 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2004-05, to place the property on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties and categorize the property as Key by a vote of 6-0 (Bustamante, Lutz, Schaefer absent). B. The property owner appealed the Historic Resources Commission action to the City Council (Appeal No. 2004-07). C. On September 20, 2004 the City Council unanimously voted to continue the public hearing for 60 days. The matter was further continued on November 15, 2004 and February 22, 2005. Resolution No. 2005-XXX Page 1 of 4 75A-15 EXEMPTFROMFEESPURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 9 6103 D. On March 21, 2005 the City Council of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing, and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral. E. F.B. Elliott House located at 1905 North Valencia Street, Santa Ana, was built circa 1912 and qualifies for listing on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as a representative example of Bunglow/Craftman style architecture. 1. The structure is eligible to be placed within the Key category for its distinctive architectural style and quality as illustrated by its side gabled roof with rafters exposed at the eaves; sheathing in shingle courses of alternating heights; a recessed porch spanning most of the fagade, featuring a brick wall and pedestals; massive brick piers marking the end of the porch; and a series of casement windows featured in the front facade. 2. The legal owner of the subject property is Clarence H. Kroll. 3. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 4. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 5. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement in the key category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(2) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Section 3: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review. A Categorical Exemption will be filed for this project. Section 4: The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby denies Appeal No. 2004-07 and approves Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2004-05 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2004-05 for the property located at 1905 North Valencia Street, Santa Ana. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearings, which includes but not is not limited to: the Staff reports and exhibits attached thereto; the reports entitled "Historical Property Description;" and the public testimony all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5: For the subject property, a report entitled "Historical Property Description," is on file in the Planning and Building Department, and is hereby approved and adopted, and together with the staff report and this resolution, justify the findings for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties into a category. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is authorized and directed to include this resolution in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Resolution No. 2005-XXX Page 2 of 4 75A-16 EXEMPTFROMFEESPURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE ~ 6103 Section 6. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder's Office after the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029. Section 7. This decision rendered by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana is final and is subject to judicial review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6. The Clerk of the Council shall give direct notice to the applicant of the Council's decision and these findings. ADOPTED this _ day of March, 2005. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Kylee O. Otto Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Council members CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2005-032 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2005-XXX Page 3 of 4 75A-17 EXEMPT FROM FEES PURUSANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 96103 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 . 003-164-18 1905 North Valencia Street Clarence H. Kroll EXHIBIT A 75A-18 RESUB OF NOB HILL TR LOT 17 BLK G N 55 FT S 105 FT Resolution No. 2005-XXX Page 4 of 4