HomeMy WebLinkAboutCALIFORNIA PACIFIC PROPERTIES 1-1990
,.
.
. ':h,7~ '..:-:: ,~"rt;fy d~~t ~:'::: i~::,:',:2~Silt
,,..;: " ~-~2'.:;.,~~': TIJ[ fi'68 ;" ,"...", :::1
..~'" ~:;~" \.' ~;,r~:, ~\~~ I'~",:"- :~".\I(.1rnment
C;Q;'~e~ti~n~-!T.i--~;iaL (j. .p~J
{,S' ?Cf.$'
REC0"OING REQUESTED BY
A" ..-
Wl-nN1~ECORDED MAIL TO:
Ci~rk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
20 civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
r 90-625289
91-415237
V
PcJ-/D2-
CC: tJA
(4
fi;</
/1-
,-i:;.::ORDED il\j C~='''''~,:',J -":f'......RDS
"' '" ""'j,-_ .i_'",~
_F ORANGE;:;~:.T"~.:.U;:ORf"A
$13, c C
C19
.0) 50 DM
._-- .
NOV 2 7 '90
r .
I $ 7JCO i
1 G2 Qi-
,,0
4 a'~RECORDER
Only)
a substitute Exhibit "8" in order
to clarify tile depiction 0,- tile
prooerty covered by til is document.
There has been no
materi a 1 chanse."
"This
(Above Space for Recorder's Use
docuGent is bein9 re-recorded solely to attach
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOR LAKE CENTER PROFESSIONAL oFFICE PARK
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREE~:~T ("DeVe~ Agreement")
is made and entered into this day of ~~, 1990, by
and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of
California ("city"), and CALIFORNIA PACIFIC PROPERTIES, a
CaLifornia general partnership ("Developer").
R E C I TAL S:
A. California Government Code SS 65864 et sea.
provide that the legislative body of a city may enter into a
development agreement with persons having legal or equitable
interests in real property for the development of real
property in order to, among other things: (i) vest certain
rights in the developer; (ii) provide certainty in the
approval of development projects in order to avoid the waste
of resources; (iii) encourage investment in and commitment to
comprehensive planning which will make maximum efficient
utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the
public; (iv) strengthen the public planning process and
encourage private participation in comprehensive planning;
and (v) reduce the economic costs of development by providing
assurance to the developer that the developer may proceed
with its projects in accordance with existing policies,
rules, and regulations subject to conditions of approval.
B. Pursuant to California Government Code section
65865, the City has adopted its Resolution No. 82-92,
establishing procedures and requirements for the approval of
development agreements. Developer has applied to the City
pursuant to California Government Code sections 65864-
65869.5, and pursuant to said Resolution for approval of the
Development Agreement set forth herein.
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4
. .
C. The city desires to enter into this Development
Agreement with Developer in order to facilitate the
development of certain property (the "Property") known as
"Lake Center Professional Office Park" (the "Development"),
more fully described in Exhibit A and shown on the map set
forth on Exhibit B, both attached hereto. Such development
shall be in accordance with (i) Specific Development Plan
No. 58, adopted by the same ordinance of the City which
approved this Development Agreement (the "plan") and (ii)
Existing Development Regulations (as defined below); provided
however, no use which is permitted only pursuant to the
issuance of a conditional use permit by the Plan shall be
considered part of the "Development" within the scope of this
Development Agreement. The City has given notice of its
intention to adopt this proposed Development Agreement, has
conducted public hearings thereon pursuant to Government Code
section 65867, and the city's Resolution No. 82-98 and has
found that the provisions of this Development Agreement and
its purposes are consistent with the objectives, policies,
general land uses and programs specified in the city's
General Plan, the Plan, and the Existing Development
Regulations. In connection with its approval of the
Development, a Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was
prepared and certified by the city Council on Ddo (1,# 14 f,
Ii!irL .
D. Developer has engaged, prior to the date of this
Development Agreement, in substantial development activity on
the Property, and has completed approximately fifty percent
(50%) of the construction of the Development Plan. In the
course of this work, Developer has provided significant
public benefits and has invested substantial amounts of money
in reliance on project approvals. continued development of
the Property will require the construction of substantial
public improvements in various phases, many of which
improvements will benefit both the Development and
surrounding areas. certain development risks and
uncertainties associated with the long term nature of the
Development, including the cost of the portion of these
public improvements, could discourage and deter Developer
from making the long term commitments necessary to fully
develop the Property; therefore, the parties desire to enter
into this Development Agreement in order to reduce or
eliminate uncertainties to such development over which the
City has control.
E. As permitted by law, the city and Developer
desire to establish design and development standards for the
entire build-out period of the Development, including all
phases thereof, the permitted uses for the Development, and
to identify the scope of public infrastructure improvements
to be required for and as a result of the Development.
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 2
F. The City recognizes that Developer may sustain
substantial losses if the city were to default in its
obligations herein undertaken, including the substantial
investment made by Developer to plan the Development.
G. The City, by electing to enter into contractual
agreements such as this one, acknowledges that the
obligations of the city shall survive beyond the term or
terms of the present city council members, that such action
will serve to bind the City and future councils to the
obligations thereby undertaken, and this Development
Agreement shall limit the future exercise of certain
governmental and proprietary powers of the city. By
approving this Development Agreement, the City Council has
elected to exercise certain governmental powers at the time
of entering into this Development Agreement rather than
deferring its actions to some undetermined future date. The
terms and conditions of this Development Agreement have
undergone extensive review by the City and its council and
have been found to be fair, just and reasonable, and the city
has concluded that the pursuit of the Development will serve
the best interests of its citizens and the public health,
safety and welfare will be best served by entering into this
obligation. The City acknowledges that Developer would not
consider or engage in the Development without the assurances
of development entitlement which this Development Agreement
is designed to provide.
H. The mutual undertakings, assurances, and
covenants provided for in this Development Agreement provide
public benefits to the City and its residents, including the
promotion of comprehensive planning, private and public
cooperation and participation in the provision of public
benefits, the increase in the City tax revenues from the
Development, and the effective and efficient development of
public facilities and infrastructure supporting the
Development which was contemplated and promoted by Government
Code SS 65864 et seo.
I. This Development Agreement will promote and
encourage the development of the property by providing
Developer and its creditors with a greater degree of
certainty of Developer's ability to expeditiously and
economically complete the development effort, and the parties
agree that the consideration to be received by the city
pursuant to this Development Agreement and the rights secured
to Developer hereunder constitute sufficient consideration to
support the covenants and agreements of the city and
Developer. By entering into this Development Agreement, the
City desires to vest in Developer, to the fullest extent
possible under the law, all possible development entitlements
in order to complete the Development.
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 3
J. The City Planning commission and the City
Council have found and determined that this Development
Agreement: (i) is consistent with the City's general plan
and all specific plans as of the date of this Development
Agreement (as referenced in Government Code 55 65450 et seq.)
applicable to the Development; (ii) is in the best interest
of the health, safety, and general welfare of the city, its
residents, and the public; (iii) is entered into pursuant to
and constitutes a present exercise of the city's police
power; and (iv) is entered into pursuant to and in compliance
with the requirements of Government Code 5 65867, the city
Development Agreement Resolution No. 82-92; and the City
Council has adopted an ordinance authorizing the execution of
this Development Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree as follows:
1. Bindinq Effect of Development Aqreement. The
Development Agreement pertains to the Property as described
in Exhibit A. The burdens of the Development Agreement are
binding upon, and the benefits of the Development Agreement
inure to all successors in interest of the parties to the
Development Agreement, and constitute covenants which run
with the Property, and in order to provide continued notice
thereof, this Development Agreement will be recorded by the
parties. The assurances provided to Developer in this
Development Agreement are provided pursuant to and as
contemplated by Government Code 55 65864 et seq., and in
consideration for the undertakings of Developer as set forth
in this Development Agreement, and are intended by the city
to be and have been relied upon by Developer to its detriment
in undertaking the obligations and covenants provided in this
Development Agreement and in expending monies and making
improvements pursuant to this Development Agreement. The
parties agree that the consideration to be received by the
city pursuant to this Development Agreement and the rights
secured to Developer hereunder constitute sufficient
consideration to support the covenants and agreements of the
City and Developer.
2. Relationship of the Parties. It is hereby
specifically understood and acknowledged that the Development
is a private project and that neither the City nor Developer
will be deemed to be the agent of the other for any purposes
whatsoever.
3. Reservations and Dedications. It is hereby
further understood and agreed that no reservations or
dedications of land will be required by the City as a
condition to development of the Property during the Term (as
OCll\DBC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 4
herein defined), except as part of the conditions imposed in
connection with the approval of the site development plan for
the Plan or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the city and
Developer. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the
city's powers of eminent domain.
4. Term.
(a) The term ("Term") of this Development
Agreement is fifteen (15) years from the date of
execution, subject to earlier termination as hereinafter
provided.
(b) Pursuant to section 66452.6(a) of the
California Subdivision Map Act, any tentative Subdivision
Map approved for the Property shall also be extended for a
period equal to the period this Agreement remains in
effect.
5. Development Standards. In connection with
development of the Property by Developer, the city hereby
agrees that the permitted uses of the Property, density of
use, intensity of use, maximum height and size of proposed
buildings shall be those set forth specifically in the Plan.
6. processinq of Applications and Permits. The
city will accept the processing and review of all
applications for permits or other entitlements with respect
to the development and the use of the Property in accordance
with this Development Agreement. It is understood by the
parties to this Development Agreement that pursuant to
existing law, development review approvals shall not remain
valid for the Term of this Development Agreement, but only
for the term of such development review approvals.
Accordingly, Developer shall have the right to file such new
development review applications on portions of the
Development where such previously approved development review
approvals have expired. Any such new development review
applications filed for the Development shall be reviewed in
accordance with the Plan and Existing Development
Regulations.
7. Development Review. Nothing set forth herein
shall impair or interfere with the right of the City to
require the processing of building permits as required by law
and to conduct its development review of any specific
improvements proposed for the Development pursuant to the
applicable provisions of Chapter 41 of the City's Municipal
Code which are in effect as of the date hereof; provided,
however, no such review shall authorize or permit the City to
impose any condition and/or withhold approval to any proposed
building the result of which would be inconsistent with any
term or provision of this Development Agreement, and it is
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 5
hereby further provided that the basis for the city's
development review shall, to the degree possible, be limited
to architectural design and compatibility with the standards
and specifications set forth in the Plan and the Existing
Development Regulations specified in section 12 of this
Agreement. It is further agreed that the City shall in all
events provide the reasons for disapproval in the event that
the City disapproves any building as proposed.
8. utilitv Capacitv. It is hereby agreed that the
City will not undertake any act or neglect to perform any act
or duty which would impair or inhibit Developer's receipt of
water or sewer service subject only to the payment of fees
therefor by Developer. The City hereby represents that it
currently has sufficient water and sanitary sewage capacity
for the entire development of the Property. Nothing herein
shall be construed to limit the City's ability to impose
reasonable conditions on future discretionary approvals which
require Developer to install water and sewer lines and
appurtenances servicing the Property.
9. Assiqnment. Developer shall have the right to
sell, assign, or transfer all of its interest in the Property
along with all of its right, title and interest in and to
this Development Agreement to any person, firm or corporation
at any time during the term of this Development Agreement
without the consent of the City.
10. periodic Review of Compliance. In accordance
with Government Code section 65865.1, the City Council shall
review this Development Agreement at least once each calendar
year hereafter. At such periodic reviews, Developer must
demonstrate its good faith compliance with the terms of this
Development Agreement. Developer agrees to furnish such
evidence of good faith compliance as the City, in the
reasonable exercise of its discretion and after reasonable
notice to Developer, may require. Developer shall be deemed
to be in good faith compliance with this Development
Agreement if the city is not entitled by the terms and
provisions of this Development Agreement to terminate this
Development Agreement.
11. Amendment or Cancellation. This Development
Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part
only by mutual consent of the parties and in the manner
provided in Government Code Sections 65868, 65867 and
65867.5.
12. Vestinq of Development Riqhts.
(al General Statement. As a material
inducement to Developer and its lenders to continue with
diligent efforts to promote the development of the
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 6
.,
Property, the city desires to cause all development rights
which may be required to develop to completion the
Property with buildings and related improvements
consistent with the Plan, to be deemed vested in
developer, as of the date of this Development Agreement,
to the greatest extent permitted by law, and to be free of
all discretionary rights of the city or any body or agency
thereof, except as herein provided, to impose any
subsequent building moratoriums or restrictions on
development which are inconsistent with this Development
Agreement.
(b) Existinq Rules to Govern. In accordance
with the terms of Government Code S 65866, the City and
Developer agree that the ordinances, rules, regulations
and official policies of the city (collectively, the
"Existing Development Regulations") in effect as of the
date of this Development Agreement, governing the design,
density, permitted land uses, improvement, and
construction standards applicable to the Development shall
govern during the Term of this Development Agreement. For
ease of reference only, a copy of a portion of the
Existing Development Regulations is set forth in Exhibit C
attached hereto. Except as otherwise provided in this
Development Agreement, no amendment to, revision of, or
addition to any of the Existing Development Regulations
without Developer's written approval, whether adopted or
approved by the City Councilor any office, board,
commission or other Agency of the City, or by the people
of the City through charter amendment or initiative
measure, shall be effective or enforceable by the City
with respect to the Development, its design, grading,
construction, remodeling, use or occupancy, schedule of
development.
(c) Definition of "Existinq Develooment
Requlations". As used herein, "Existing Development
Regulations" shall not include municipal laws and
regulations which do not conflict with Developer's vested
rights to develop and use the property in accordance with
the Plan. Developer and its successors and assigns and
all persons and entities in occupation of any portion of
the Property shall comply with such non-conflicting laws
and regulations as may from time to time be enacted or
amended hereafter. Specifically, but without limitation
on the foregoing, such non-conflicting laws and
regulations include the following:
(i) Taxes, assessments, fees and charges;
(ii) Building, electrical, mechanical, fire
and similar codes based upon uniform codes
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 7
incorporated by reference into the Santa Ana
Municipal Code;
(iii) Laws, including zoning code
provisions, which regulate the manner in which
business activities may be conducted or which
prohibit any particular type of business activity on
a city-wide basis; and
(iv) Procedural rules.
(d) Subseauent "Slow/No Growth" Measures.
Consistent with (a) and (b), above, the City and Developer
specifically agree that any subsequently enacted
initiatives, referendums, or amendments to the City's
General Plan and/or zoning Code which contain "slow/no
growth" measures or which by their terms are intended to,
or by operation have such effect shall have no application
to the Development. Notwithstanding any such measures,
the mitigation measures required for the Development are
limited to those established by this Development
Agreement.
13. Environmental Compliance.
(a) EIR processina Completed. Developer hereby
acknowledges that the Development shall be subject to the
mitigation measures set forth in the EIR and identified in
Exhibit D hereto. To the extent that Developer develops
the Development, Developer hereby agrees to implement the
various mitigation measures required to be implemented by
Developer as specified in Exhibit D.
(b) subseauent Environmental Review. In
exercising its legislative discretion to enter into this
Development Agreement and to commit the City to the
completion of the Development, the city has reviewed and
considered the potential adverse environmental impacts
related to all aspects of the contemplated project,
including, without limitation, the potential demands the
Development will make on local and regional streets,
highways, parks and recreation areas, water capacity and
water lines, sewer capacity and sewer lines, flood and
storm drain systems, and energy conservation, and the
effect on school capacity, traffic, pedestrian safety,
noise and air quality impacts. The City has further
reviewed and considered from a variety of perspectives,
and has analyzed pursuant to a variety of assumptions, the
projected future regional and cumulative environmental
demands that will compete with the Development for
available capacities and cumulatively add to potential
adverse impacts. In so doing, the city has considered
among other things, the possibilities that:
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 8
(i) Federal, local, regional and state
plans, if any, for provision of new infrastructure
systems or expansion of existing infrastructure
systems may be delayed, modified or abandoned;
(ii) The types, intensities, and amount of
future regional development may exceed or otherwise
be different from that currently being planned by the
city and other local agencies; and
(iii) Regional and Development generated
demands on infrastructure and utility improvements to
be constructed as a part of the Development may
exceed in either the short run or the long run the
allocated capacities for such demands.
After assessing these and other potential
adverse environmental impacts associated with the
development of the Property, the city has imposed
mitigation measures through the EIR, and this Development
Agreement to the fullest extent the city considers
feasible and necessary. The city has determined that
phased completion of the Development in the manner
contemplated will itself provide the mitigation measures
needed to contribute to alleviate short run and long run
potential adverse environmental impacts, and that the
public benefits of the Development override any potential
adverse environmental impacts which may arise during the
development period; therefore, the city agrees, consistent
with California Public Resources Code Section 21166, that
no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report
shall be required by the city for the subsequent
discretionary approvals except as set forth in said
section.
(c) Susan/Sunflower Traffic Siqnal. Developer
shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of
Susan Street and Sunflower Avenue (the "Sunflower signal")
in accordance with standard traffic signal warrants.
Because the Sunflower Signal will benefit other property
in the vicinity of the Development, the City shall use its
best good faith efforts to enter into an agreement (the
"Sunflower Agreement") with the city of Costa Mesa ("Costa
Mesa") (i) requiring Costa Mesa to collect "fair share"
funds (the "Sunflower Funds") from landowners with
development projects in the vicinity of the Development
(including, but not limited to, the "Metro pointe" project
of Arnel Development Company) as a condition to granting
any development approvals for such projects, to the extent
authorized by law, and (ii) requiring Costa Mesa to
transfer to the city all Sunflower Funds collected
pursuant to the Sunflower Agreement. In such event, the
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 9
city shall transfer all Sunflower Funds to Developer, up
to an aggregate amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of
Developer's total cost of installing the Sunflower Signal.
(d) Lake Center/MacArthur Traffic Sianal.
Developer and the city agree that the intersection of Lake
Center Drive and MacArthur Boulevard adjacent to the
Property may require a traffic signal during the term of
this Development Agreement (the "MacArthur signal"). At
any time the City determines through traffic monitoring
that the MacArthur Signal is warranted, the City may, by
providing notice to Developer, require Developer to (1)
install the MacArthur Signal in accordance with standard
traffic signal warrants, or, at Developer's option, (2)
pay to the City the cost of installing the MacArthur
signal, in which case the city shall install the signal.
To ensure the performance of Developer'S
obligation, Developer shall post a "faithful performance"
bond in the amount of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($150,000.00) as a condition to the City's issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the first building on the
Property constructed after the effective date of this
Agreement. The City shall release the bond at the earlier
of (i) the Developer's completion of installation of the
MacArthur Signal, or (ii) six months after Developer
provides accurate written notice to the City that the
Development is at least ninety percent (90%) occupied, at
which time, if the MacArthur signal has not become
warranted, the Developer'S obligation to install the
MacArthur Signal shall be extinguished.
14. Enforcement. Unless amended or cancelled as
provided in Paragraph 11, this Development Agreement shall
continue to be enforceable by any party to it,
notwithstanding a change in general or specific plans,
zoning, sUbdivision, building or other regulations adopted by
the City which alter or amend the rules, regulations or
policies applicable to the Development.
15. Supersession of Aareement bv Chanaes in State or
Federal Law. In the event that State or Federal laws or
regulations enacted after this Development Agreement have
been entered into or the action or inaction of any other
affected governmental jurisdiction prevents or precludes
compliance with one or more provision of this Development
Agreement that requires changes in plans, maps or permits
approved by the city, the parties shall:
(a) Provide the other party with written notice
of such State or Federal restriction, provide a copy of
such regulation or policy as a statement of conflict for
the provisions of this Development Agreement; and
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 10
(b) Promptly meet and confer with the other
party in a good faith and make a reasonable attempt to
take such action necessary to protect and preserve the
validity and enforceability of this Development Agreement,
including modification or suspension of this Development
Agreement, only if such action would be ultimately
necessary to comply with such Federal or state law or
regulation and at the same time would protect and preserve
the Development Plan contemplated by this Development
Agreement. Thereafter, regardless of whether the parties
reach agreement on the effect of such Federal or state law
regulation upon this Development Agreement, the matter
shall be scheduled for a hearing before the city Council,
upon thirty (30) days notice, for the purposes of
determining the exact action which is required by such
Federal or state law or regulation.
16. Enforced Delav and Extension of Times of
Performance. In addition to specific provisions of this
Development Agreement, performance by either party hereunder
shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults
are demonstrated to be due to acts of God, war, acts or
omissions of the city, acts or omissions of third parties
which are not a party to this Development Agreement,
including but not limited to, other governmental agencies, or
other causes beyond the reasonable control of Developer. An
extension of time in writing for any such cause shall be
granted for the period of the enforced delay, or longer as
mutually agreed upon, which period shall commence to run from
the time of commencement of cause.
17. Notices. Any notice or instrument required to
be given or delivered to either party to the Development
Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in
the United states mail, certified mail, postage prepaid,
addressed to:
City:
City of Santa Ana
20 civic Center Plaza
P.o. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
Attn: city Manager
California Pacific Properties
3070 South Bristol Street, suite 440
costa Mesa, California 92626
Attn: Mr. Gregory Butcher
Notice of change of address shall be delivered in the same
manner as any other notice provided herein, and shall be
effective three days after mailing by the above-described
procedure.
Developer:
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 11
'.
18. Breach and Remedies. Notwithstanding any
provision of this Development Agreement to the contrary,
Developer shall not be deemed to be in default under this
Development Agreement, and the city may not terminate
Developer's rights under this Development Agreement unless
the city shall have first delivered a written notice of any
alleged default to Developer, which shall specify the nature
of such default. If such default is not cured by Developer
within ninety (90) days of service of such notice of default,
or with respect to defaults which cannot be cured within such
period, Developer fails to commence to cure the default
within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of
default, or thereafter fails to diligently pursue the cure of
such default until completion, the city may terminate
Developer's rights under this Development Agreement. In the
event of a default by either party which is not cured within
the time prescribed hereinabove, the non-defaulting party may
undertake one or more of the following remedies:
(a) Terminate this Development Agreement by
written notice stating the grounds for such action; or
(b) Institute an action for specific
performance of this Development Agreement, it being
expressly agreed that, in the event of a breach of this
Development Agreement, irreparable harm is likely to occur
to the non-breaching party and damages are not an
available remedy. In no event shall either party to
entitled to damages against the other party based upon the
other party's default under this Development Agreement.
19. Estonnel certificate. Either party may, at any
time, and from time to time, deliver written notice to the
other party requesting such party to certify in writing that,
to the knowledge of the certifying party, (i) this
Development Agreement is in full force and effect and a
binding obligation of the parties, (ii) this Development
Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or
in writing, and if so amended, identifying the amendments,
and (iii) the requesting party is not in default in the
performance of its obligations under this Development
Agreement, or if in default, to describe therein the nature
and amount of any such defaults. The party receiving a
request hereunder shall execute and return such certificate
within thirty days following the receipt thereof. The city
acknowledges that a certificate hereunder may be relied upon
by transferees and mortgagees of Developer.
20. Entire Aareement.
and the exhibits herein contain
the parties, and is intended by
state the Development Agreement
This Development Agreement
the entire agreement between
the parties to completely
in full. Any agreement or
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 12
. .
representation respecting the matters dealt with herein or
the duties of any party in relation thereto, not expressly
set forth in this Development Agreement, is null and void.
21. Recordation of Aareement. This Development
Agreement and any amendment and cancellation hereof shall be
recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange by
the Clerk of the city within the period required by Section
65868.5 of the Government Code.
22. Severability. If any term provision, condition,
or covenant of this Development Agreement, or the application
thereof to any party or circumstances, shall to any extent be
held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the
instrument, or the application of such term, provision,
condition or covenant to persons or circumstances other than
those as to whom or which it is held invalid or
unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and each term
and provision of this Development Agreement shall be valid
and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
23. Section Headinas. All section headings and
subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not
affect any construction or interpretation of this Development
Agreement.
24. Counteroarts. This Development Agreement has
been executed in one or more counterparts, each of which has
been deemed an original, but all of which constitute one and
the same instrument.
25.
performance
as to which
Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the
of the provisions of this Development Agreement
time is an element.
26. Date. This Development Agreement shall be dated
as of the date of adoption of an ordinance of the city
approving this Development Agreement, it being understood
that such an ordinance shall not have been submitted to the
City Council for adoption until after the execution of this
Development Agreement by Developer. This Development
Agreement shall become effective on the date said ordinance
becomes effective.
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 13
"
SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed
this Development Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.
"City"
CITY OF SANTA ANA, a municipal
corporation
By:
\~---f r:;-/',
Daniel H. Young.
Mayor ~
ATTEST:
~-,- y~ '7
J ce C. Guy ~
Ci.ty Cle:ck -..
Approved as to content
_-, 1_'
/,
t.,
City Manag@r
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~6er, Esq.
City Attorney
"Developer"
OiV>i/e~
CALIFORNIA
By:
OCJJ\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ss.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
On this ~I day of September, 1990, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,
personally appeared GREGORY L. BUTCHER, personally known to
me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person who executed the within instrument as a partner
of CALIFORNIA PACIFIC PROPERTIES, the partnership that
executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that
such partnership executed the same.
A~'" OFFICIAL SEAL
I ~(,'~"l ;"1- LORI L WHITE
!:c '; NotaJy Publio-CaJilomia
'::-'" .. ORANGE COUNTY
,\~, ')
Z~7'/ My Comm, Exp. Mar. 28, 1993
WITNESS my hand and~i~ial seal.;
?defY!) //-'
No ary puMic
V \.,
1/ ?
/J_IAff?
State of California } ,~
55. ~~;\
County of Orange 1- i ..: ~~!
} \_\ ...:~,....". /.1
\c~'Y
O '..:1 ,J .I. ~
n this vOf..<.. day of Ivnv-&..,D,A. . in the
year /99 f) . before me CI k f h
. er 0 t e
Councilor ~'-I U M711 4. !JA,Vu-. Deputy Clerk of the
COU~~I. ~f the City of Santa Ana personally apoeared /J4,vICI. It. Y()IJ.~
+VlVI~" C ~ .
(L v . perSOnally known to me (or I
oroved to me on the basis of satisfactory eVidence) 9V-
to be the person who executed this Instrument as 0 .
f1I,.,yofl.. AiVV /'u.t'-Ak ,,~ T/f~ ("0"'.#'1':.1'- I'
at the City of Santa Ana and acknowledged to me tnat '
the City of Santa Ana exeCUTed it. f}Iu
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 15
,
"
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPllON
Parcel 1
Lot 1 of Tract No. 11420, in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of
California as per map recorded in Book <192, Pages 6 through 9 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office
of the County Recorder of Orange County.
Parcel 2
Parcel 1 of a Parcel Map in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of
California, as per map filed in Book 121. Pages 14 and 15 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the
County Recorder of Orange County;
EXCEPTING THEREFROM all of Lots 1 and 2 of Tract No. 11420, in the City of Santa
Ana, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded'in Book 492, Pages 6 through 9 of
Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County.
Parcel 4
Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 84-876 in the City of Santa Ana, County of
Orange, State of Caiifornia, as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 196, Pages 22 through 24 of
Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said Orange County.
Parcel 5
That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Santa Ana. County of Orange. State
of California, being that portion of Parcel 2 as shown on a map filed in Book 127, Pages 48 and 49
of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Orange County lying northerly and
northwesterly of the northerly and northwesterly line of Lot B of Tract No. 11421 as shown on a map
thereof filed in Book 505. Pages 20 through 22 of Miscellaneous Maps in said Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
EXHIBIT B
MAP OF PROPERTY
The map of the property is set forth in the attached copies of
"site Plan and "Existing and Future Buildings."
A~ Ll\K: C=NT:~
'J.B A pnQFESSIONAL OFFICE P^RK
~
7.;>('
., 'irIQ
ill'l)
Yt-~
P"rc~l. 2
Parcell of Map filed in Book 121, Pages 14 .,:< 15
5.583 Acres
( I~
= 1 _.~
- tll;-~
:II
f!H+f!#fH
#HtttttttttitIt
"illil~I!HHtltH-i -
I I
-~
~, ,
Paree 1 4
Parcell
Parcel Map 84-876
7,091 Acres
Parcel 4
l'..reel. L
Parcel Map 84.876
J .150 Acres
Parcel 1
Lot 1
Tract Map 11420
1. 722 Acres
Legend:
P<'Ircel: Parcel Described In Exhibit A
SunOower Ave.
2:\11TTiTT R
La..
C.nt.,
"==
Suntlow.r
Slr..1
~ "'--/ (
.~
-I"
~'"
't
I , I l' .. I't ", ., 'I'
APPROXIMATE PLAN
LAKE CENTER
A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE PARK
California PacWc Properties
Santa Ana
N
.0
LEGEND:
CJ EXISTING BUILDING
II;tl FUTURE BUILDINQ
"
EXHIBIT C
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS -- PARTIAL
Sec. 41-670. Standards for approval.
Plans for a development project shall be approved if the
development project, as proposed in the plans, satisfies the
following standards:
(1) The development project is consistent with the general
plan and with any applicable specific plan adopted
pursuant to California Government Code, section 65450
et seq.
(2) The development project is consistent with development
design and architectural standards adopted by
resolution of the city council.
(3) The development project provides for adequate vehicular
and pedestrian access and circulation and vehicular
parking.
(4) The development project provides for adequate access
for city emergency and service vehicles and equipment.
(5) The development project provides for adequate utility
services.
(6) The development project complies with all applicable
standards and regulations set forth in this chapter,
including but not limited to landscaping requirements,
trash area enclosures, and screening requirements for
loading and parking areas.
OCll\DEC\CAL-PAC\CAL-PAC.AG4 iii
DI' \Fr (Aueust 7, J~90)
BXIIl:BIT D
LAKE CENTER SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT
MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
EARTH RESOURCES
1. Grading shall be conducted by the project applicant in accordance with plans prepared
by a civil engineer and based on recommendations of a soil engineer and an
engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and
geologic invcstigation for the proposed structures. Permanent reproducible copies of
the 'Approved as Built' grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished by the
project applicant to the Building Department.
Timinv or TmplementationNerifieation:
Prior to grading permit issuance & during
grading operation
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and periodic field
inspection during grading operation
Responsible PartY:
Sr. . Ian Check Engineer, Building Di-ision
Verification (Names & Dates):
2. A complete erosion study shall be prepared by the project applicant prior to the start
of any grading activities to minimize the erosion potential created during development,
and grading operations by the applicant shall be in conformance with all City of Santa
Ana ordinances pertaining to grading.
Timinv of TmplementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance and
during grading operation
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and periodic field
inspections
Responsible Pa~
Sr. Plan Cleck Engineer, Building Di-ision
Verification (Name & Date):
885MMP
1
, .
DRAFT (August 7, 1990)
3. Possible water erosion during construction shall be mitigated by the installation of
temporary erosion control devices by the project applicant, as required by the State
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Timin!' of ImplemcntationNerification:
Pr;or to grading permit issuance and during
grading operation
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and periodic field
inspections
Responsible PaT\V=
Sr. Plan O1eck Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
4. Utilization of desiltation devices such as sandbags in areas that may discharge into
city streets shall be implemented by the project applicant prior to the commencement
of grading activities.
Timin~ of TmplementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and field inspection
Responsible PartY:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
5. The grading plan prepared by the applicant shall include a description of haul routes,
access points to the site, and a watering and sweeping program designed to minimize
impacts of haul operations.
Timin~ of TmplementationNerification:
Prior to approval of any grading permits
and implementation during grading phase
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and periodic field
inspections
Responsible Party:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
885MMP
2
, .
DRAFf (August 7, 1990)
6. All structures shall be designed by the applicant in accordance with the seismic design
provisions of the Uniform Building Codes to promote safety in the event of an
earthquake.
Timine- of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to approval of any grading permits
and implementation duri..g grading phase
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and periodic field
inspections
Responsible Party:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
WATER
7. Prior to issuance of grading permits, onsite drainage improvement plans prepared by
the applicant shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana Public Works
Department, and said onsite improvements shall be constructed by the project
applicant.
Timing- of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and field inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Manager, Engineering Services
Verification (JIlame & Date):
8. All development within the Santa Ana River floodplain shall be carefully reviewed by
the City of Santa Ana to ensure that it is located and designed to minimize potential
damage from flooding and to ensure that such development does not endanger other
aTer".
Timine- of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and field inspection
Responsible PartIes:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Manager, Engineering Services
Verification (Name & Date):
885MMP
3
, .
DRAFT (August 7, 1990)
9. The proposed project shall comply with city standards described in the General Plan
as they apply to buildings and parking structures located in a Doodplain.
Timinr of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Written evidence provided by applicant
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Oleck Engineer, Building Division
&. Manager, Engineering Services
Verification (Name &. Date):
NOISE
10. All construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m"
Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be permitted on Sundays or federal
holidays.
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and field inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name &. Date):
11. Where appropriate, construction equipment shall be muffled to reduce construction
noise impacts.
Timinl1 of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check, written verification
provided by appliant, and field inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Oleck Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name &. Date):
885MMP
4
DRAIT (August 7, 1990)
12. All construction activities shall comply with all local, state, and federal construction
noise regulations.
Timinr of ImplementatinnNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Written verification from applicant & field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
13. The project applicnat shall use a textured parking surface, such as asphalt or textured
concrete in the parking structure to reduce tire noise.
Timinr of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Architectural plans check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
LIGHT AJI,'D GLARE
14. All rooftop mounted parking structure lights shall be located and shielded so that all
light is contained within the boundaries of the project and no light spillage occurs to
adjacent properties.
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Architectural plans check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Dale):
885MMP
5
DRAFT (August 7, 1990)
15. All parking structure interior lights shall be high intensity discharge (stem mounted)
with no light spillage to adjacent properties. No fluorescent tube fIXtures shall be
allowed.
Timin'" of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Architectural plans check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
16. Light and glare from automobiles within the parking structures shall be screened with
solid, opaque wall materials while maintaining aU ventilation requirements of the
Uniform Building Code.
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Architectural plans check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
17. The applicant shall install non-reflective glass windows on the bottom floors of all new
buildings.
Timinr of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Architectural plans check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
885MMP
6
,"
DRAJ.l (August 7, 1990)
TRAFFIClCIRCUlA TlON
18. With the first building permit for the proposed project, the project applicant shall
construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Susan StreetlSunflower Avenue in
accordance with standard traffic signal warrants. Under the terms of a pending
reimbursement agreement between the cities of Santa Ana and Costa Mesa, the
project applicant shall install, and provide initial costs for, this traffic signal but shall
eventually be reimbursed for all but the "fair share" of the signal costs associated with
the proposed Lake Center project.
Timin\, of ImplementationNerification:
Concurrent with first building permit
construction
Method of Verification:
Improvements plan check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Verification (Name & Date):
Manager, Engineering Services
19. The project applicant shall install multiway (4-way) 'stop" signage at the intersection
of Lake Center and Susan Street.
Timin~ of ImvlementationNerification:
Prior to first building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Improvements plan check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Manager, Engineer Services
Verification (Name & Dale):
20. The project applicant shall post a faithful performance bond for the future installation
of a traffic signal at Lake Center and MacArthur Boulevard. This intersection shall
be monitored as the project is constructed for satisfaction of signal warrant
requirements and the signal shall be installed as warranted.
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification: Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification: Written evidence provided by applicant
Re~ponsible Parties: Sr. Plan Check Engineer. Building Division
. & Manager, Engineer Services
Verification (Name & Dale):
885MMP
7
DRAFT (August 7, 1990)
21. The project applicant shall pay the City of Santa Ana transportation system
improvement fees which contribute funding towards needed areawide transportation
improvements.
Timinr of TmpJementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Written evidence provided by applicant &
City Manager's Office
Responsible Panies:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Manager, Engineer Services
Verification (Name & Date):
22. The project applicant shall provide plans for and install a bus stop shelter at the
existing bus stop location at Susan StreetlSunflower Avenue in accordance with Orange
County Transit District standards. Said plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
City of Santa Ana and OCTD prior to issuance of building permits.
Timinr of TmplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Written evidence provided by applicant &
OCID
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Manager, Engineering Services
Verification (Name & Date):
23. The project applicant shall implement the proposed Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) Plan for the new development proposed within the Lake Center
specific development area. The TDM Plan shall be administered by an onsite
coordinator who shall be the responsibility of the property owner.
Timini of TmplementalionNerification:
Ongoing during life of project
Method of Verification:
Written evidence provided by applicant on
an annual basis
Resl"msible Parties:
Manager, Engineering Services & Manager,
Planning Department
Verification (Name & Date):
G:885MMP.BB
8
..
DRAFf (August 7, 1990)
24. Lighting plans prepared by the project applicant shall be revised and approved by the
City of Santa Ana prior to building permit issuance to ensure that pedestrian a=
routes to the bus stop at Sunnower and Susan are adequately illuminated.
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Plan check and field inspection
Re.~ponsible Parties:
Manager, Engineering Services & Sr. Plan
Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
"
25. A stop sign shall be installed by the project applicant at all driveway locations to
control outbound traffic nows. The City of Santa Ana Public Works Department
shall review and approve placement of stop signs prior to issuance of building permits.
Tirnin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Improvements plan ch<.:ck and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Manager, Engineering Services & Sr. Plan
Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
26. Landscape plantings and signs shall be limited by the project applicant to 36 inches in
height v.;thin 25 feet of project driveways to ensure good visibility. The City of Santa
Ana Planning Department shall re\;ew and approve landscape plans prior to issuance
of grading permits,
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Landscape plans check and field inspection
Responsible Parties:
Manager, Engineering Services & Sr. Plan
Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
885MMP
9
.'
DRAFT (August 7, 1990)
27, To ensure smooth traffic operations for vehicles entering and exiting the site, a striped
median shall be provided by the project a"plicant on Susan Street. The City of Santa
Ana Public Works Department shall review and approve onsite roadway improvements
prior to issuance of building permits.
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Improvements plan check and field
inspection
Responsihle Parties:
Manager, Engineering Services & Sr. Plan
Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
AIR QUALITY
28. The applicant shall implement fugitive dust suppression measures in a=rdance with
South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 403. Implementation of these
measures shall be monitored and reported to the City of Santa Ana.
Timinv of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to grading permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Grading plan check and field inspection
Responsihle Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
29. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any new industrial uses, the applicant
shall provide evidence to the City of Santa Ana demonstrating compliance with all
SCAQMD Regulations, including Regulation XIII, New Source Review, as applicable.
Timin\, of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Wriuen evidence provided by applicant
Responsihle Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name &. Date):
885MMP
10
'.
DRAFf (August 7, 1990)
PUBLIC SERVICES, UTILITIES AND ENERGY CONSUMPTIm,
Polices Senices
30. "Lighting of the project site shall comply with the Santa Ana Security Ordinance.
Lighting plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana prior to
issuance of building permits.
Timin~ of TmplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Architectural plans check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Oleck Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
31. Requirements for private security systems shall be determined by the City of Santa Ana
Building Department prior to issuance of occupancy permits, and shall be installed by
the project applicant a=rdingly.
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to issuance of certificates of
occupancy
Method of Verification:
Architectural plans check and final
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Oleck Engineel Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
Fire Protection Services
32. The project applicant shall pay an area fee to the city based on an area fee allotment
formula for acquisition of fire department personnel and equipment.
Timini of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Written verification from City Manager's
office
Responsihle Parties:
Sr. Plan Oleck Engineer, Building Division
& Fire Department
Verification (Name & Date):
885~.1MP
11
DRAFl (August 7, 1990)
33. As determined by the City of Santa Ana, the project applicant shall provide funds to
hire an additional Fire Safety Analyst for that period of time from initial plan submillal
to approval of final tenant improvement plan, or provide an independent fire plan
check company (approved by the Santa Ana Fire Department) to do the fire plan
. check for this project.
Timinl' of TmplementationNerifieation:
Prior to tentative tract map submillal
Method of Verification:
Written verification from City Manager's
office
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Fire Department, Plan Review Manager
Verification (Name & Date):
34. As determined by the City of Santa Ana, the project applicant shall provide funds to
K e an additional Fire Safety Specialist II for that period of time from laying of
foundations to the Certificate of Occupancy for the final tenant improvement plan.
Timinl' of TmplementationNerification:
Prior to final tract map submittal
Method of Verification:
Written verification from City Manager's
office
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Fire Department, Plan Review Manager
Verification (Name & Date):
35. Prior to building permit issuance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that the project
plans include built.in fire protection in individual buildings when circulated fire flow
exceeds 3,500 gallons per minute.
Timinl' of TmplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Building plans eheck and field inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Fire Department, Plan Review Manager
Verification (Name & Date):
885MMP
12
. "
" .
;~ ,
DRAFT (August 7, 1990)
36. Prior to building permit issuance landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the City of Santa Ana to confirm Ihatlandscaping materials include fire-retardant plant
species.
, Timin~ of ImplementalionNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verificalion:
Landscape plans check and field inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Fife Department, Plan Review Manager
Verification (Name & Date):
37. Prior to building permit issuance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that the project
plans include use of fire-retardant building materials.
Timinr of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Architectural plans check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Fife Department, Plan Review Manager
Verification (Name & Date):
Utilities
38. Reinforcement of onsile telephone facilities shall be implemented by the project
applicant. Onsite telephone facilities inlended for acceplance by Pacific Bell shall
be buill 10 Pacific Bell specifications.
Timinr of ImplementalionNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Improvements plan check and written
verification from Pacific Bell
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Dale):
885MMP
13
.,
.. .... "
.
.
DRAFT (August 7, 1990)
39. Prior to building permit issuance, the project applicant sha1l consult with Southern
California Edision (SCE) and Southern California Gas (SCG) representatives to ensure
the proposed project design is compatible with existing electrical and natural gas
. services, respectively, and to reduce impacts of possible short-term outages to existing
customers during construction.
Timini of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Improvements plan check and wrillen
verification from Southern California
Edision and Southern California Gas
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
40. Prior to issuance of building permits, the City of Santa Ana sha1l determine through
plan rcvicv.'S that installation by the project applicant of needed onsite electrical and
natural gas s)'Stems to serve the project sha1l be coordinated with insta1lation of other
utilities.
Timin!.' of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Improvements plan check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Manager, Engineer Services
Verification (Name & Date):
41. Prior to issuance of building permits, the City of Santa Ana sha1l determine through
plan reviews that a1l buildings constructed by the project applicant within the project
site shall adhere to the State Title 24 energy standards, which set for the n erg y
conservation requirements.
Timini of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Building and architectural plan checks and
field inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
885MMP
14
"II ..~
>
" -
, .
. .
~
DRAIT (August 7, 1990)
42. Prior to issuance of building permits, the City of Santa Ana shall determine through
pian reviews that all appliances to be installed by the project applicant within the
project site shall be energy efficient in a=rdance with the California Administrative
. Code, Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 4.
Timinr of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Building and architectural plan checks and
field inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
43. The project applicant shall consult with SCE and SCG concerning energy conservation
programs that could be incorporated into the project during construction,
Timin~ of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Written verification from Southern
California Edision & Southern California
Gas
Re.~ponsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
Verification (Name & Date):
44. Prior to building permit issuance, plans for private onsite water supply facilities to
serve the project (fire hydrants and water lines) shall be reviewed and approved by thc
City of Santa Ana Public Works Department, and shall be installed subsequently by
the project applicanL
Timinv of ImplementationNerification:
Prior to building permit issuance
Method of Verification:
Improvements plan check and field
inspection
Responsible Parties:
Sr. Plan Check Engineer, Building Division
& Manager, Engineer Services
Verification (Name & Date):
ilECORDEO IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
885MMP
15
.2::!Q PM AUG 5 '91
4 a'~RECORDEA