HomeMy WebLinkAbout23C - BID REJECTION STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION /STREET PROJECTS
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
~
~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
NOVEMBER 7, 2005
TITLE:
APPROVED
REJECTION OF BIDS FOR STORM
DRAIN CONSTRUCTION AND STREET
IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS (PROJECT NO. 06-
6005)
D As Recommended
D As Amended
D Ordinance on 1'1 Reading
D Ordinance on 2'" Reading
D Implementing Resolution
D Set Pubiic Hearing For
fJ-J2;a
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
/
CITY MANAGER
l/ RECOMMENDED ACTION
Reject all bids for Storm Drain Construction and Street Improvements at
Various Locations.
DISCUSSION
This project provides for storm drain construction and street
improvements at various locations. Included is a storm drain with catch
basins at the intersection of pendelton and Forest Avenues to alleviate
flooding. Also included is repair of damaged catch basins at four
different locations and replacement of a valley gutter on Birch Street
south of Warner Avenue to improve street drainage.
The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on September 2 and 5, 2005, and
bids were opened on September 27, 2005. A summary of the bid invitations
mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follow:
Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: 8
Contractors requesting bidding documents: 6
Bids received: 4
Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 0
23C-1
Project No. 06-6005
Storm Drain Construction and Street
Improvements at Various Locations
November 7, 2005
Page 2
NAME OF BIDDER
CITY
BID AMOUNT
$108,725.00
$157,835.00
$169,670.00
$206,585.80
1. Garcia Juarez Construction, Inc.
2. GCI Construction, Inc.
3. Alliance Streetworks, Inc.
4. Savala Construction Company
Brea
Costa Mesa
Anaheim
Irvine
A total of four bids were received and all were responsive. However, the
bidding documents contain inadvertent errors on the quantities of
construction materials. Judging from the wide disparities among the bids,
the low bid may not reflect the true final cost of the project.
Therefore, staff recommends rejection of all bids in order to re-bid the
project with correct quantities.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
J~~~ ~7 ~p"
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
K:\Construction\RFCA-draft\06-6005 2005-11-07 reject all bids 45WD
23C-2