HomeMy WebLinkAbout25F - BLDG PLAN CHECK/APPROPRIATION ADJUSMENTS
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
CLER OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
AUGUST 7, 2006
TITLE.
AGREEMENTS FOR BUILDING PLAN CHECK
SERVICES AND APPROPRIATION
ADJUSTMENTS
APPR VED
D As Recommended
D As Amended
D Ordinance on 151 Reading
D Ordinance on 2nd Reading
D Implementing Resolution
D Set Public Hearing For
!" aPhiL-
- ( CITY MANAGER
CO NT NUED TO
FILE UMBER
-,.,.,-,
RECOMMENDED ACTION
-"."".,-,
1. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and autho ize the City Manager and
Clerk of the Council to execute agreements ith Robert Tyler; Scott
Fazekas and Associates, Inc.; Tmad, Tayor & Gaines; and NYA
Consulting Structural Engineers in an aggre ate total amount not to
exceed $500,000.
2. Approve appropriation adjustments recognizin aggregate total amounts
not to exceed $500,000 in the 2006-2007 FY revenue account for
building plan check (account no. 011-01- 401) and appropriating
various amounts not to exceed $500,000 to t e Planning and Building
Agency 2006-2007 FY budget allocation in the account for contractual
services (account no. 11-508-6291) for pay ents to the consultants
contracted to complete building plan checks f various projects.
DISCUSSION
The City has experienced an upward trend in d velopment over the last
several years which is expected to continue in the current fiscal year.
Six major projects, alone, are expected to begi development in the next
twelve months. Among these are: One Broadway laza, a 37 story office
building on Broadway Avenue; Steadfast Cordova, a three and four story
mixed use project at 1900 N. Main Street; tw Nexus projects, which
include one 23-story residential tower at MacAr hur Cinema site, and one
four-story, 350 unit residential project at M in Street and MacArthur
Boulevard; and the Promenade Pointe project, wi h one eight-story tower
and a second 18-story tower of residential unit. These and other major
projects will put an enormous burden on the pla check staff to provide
timely and accurate processing of plans.
In order to provide an acceptable service le el for these new major
projects, while still maintaining an acceptable evel of customer service
for all plan submittals, it is necessary to aug ent plan check staff as
25F-1
.
Plan Check Agreements and Appropriation Adjustmen s
August 7, 2006
Page 2
soon as possible. Since additional full-tim
required when these major projects achieve
recommended that the City utilize contracted p
on-call basis to address the peak workload deman
employees may not
final approval, it
an check services on
s more efficiently.
be
is
an
In October 2005, City Council approved a simila request for contracted
plan check services in a total aggregate amount not to exceed $900,000.
Because many of the projects that were expected to enter the plan check
process were not submitted in FY 2005-06, on y $20,000 was actually
allocated to the Planning and Building Agency b dget for this purpose in
FY 2005-06.
Of eight consulting firms that responded to the
four consulting firms meet the City's requirem
qualified engineering staff, turn-around time,
these recommended firms, Robert Tyler and Scott
Inc., will provide complete plan check services
70% of the City's plan check fee charged to ea
The other two recommended firms, Tmad, Taylor &
Structural Engineers, will provide structura
selected projects at a rate not to exceed 40%
fee charged to the project. All contracted
required plan revisions and deferred submitta
rates. All four firms have agreed to no other a
Request for a Proposal,
nts for availability of
ocale, and fees. Two of
Fazekas and Associates,
at a rate not to exceed
h project they receive.
aines and NYA Consulting
only plan checks on
f the City's plan check
irms will process any
s at acceptable hourly
d-on costs.
FISCAL IMPACT
Plan check fees paid to the City for each projec contracted out for full
plan check will fund the cost for the consulta ts at an amount not to
exceed 70% of the plan check fee paid to the Ci y. In cases where only
structural plan check is provided by a consulting firm, the fee will be an
amount not to exceed 40% of the total plan check fee paid to the City.
These amounts will be recognized in the revenue account for building plan
check (account no. 011-01-5401) and a like amo nt appropriated to the
Planning and Building Agency account for contr ctual services (account
no. 11-508-6291), not to exceed a total amou t of $500,000. These
allocated amounts to the Planning and Buil ing Agency budget for
contracted plan check will include only fees not included in the FY 2006-
07 revenue projection for building plan check.
~
Jay)M. Trevino
E~cutive Director
Planning and Building Agency
SB:rb
sb\rfcas\2006-Q7\P!an Check Services Aug-06
~\\f\~~~..." , ,
Francisco" Gutierrez
Executive Director
Finance & Mana ement
.~::- .
APPROVAL AS T FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS:
Services Agen~
25F-2