Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNS-2723 - Amending Sections 35-153(n) and 35-155 of Santa Ana Municipal Code, Making Certain Technical Modifications to the Utility Users Tax on Telephone Services... JWF 8/2/06 ORDINANCE NO. NS-2723 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SECTIONS 35- 153(n) AND 35-155 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE MAKING CERTAIN TECHNICAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE UTILITY USERS TAX ON TELEPHONE SERVICES DUE TO CHANGES IN INTERPRETATION OF FEDERAL LAW. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Since 1975 the City of Santa Ana has collected a Utility Users Tax ("UUT") on telephone communication services. Since 1991, the tax rate has been 6%. B. When first adopted, the UUT was enacted with reference to Federal Excise Tax, 26 United States Code ~~ 4251,4252 and 4253, ("FET") upon local and long distance telephone communication services. C. The reference to the FET in the UUT was intended to be used as a benchmark for purposes of identifying the types of telephone communication services subject to the tax, and those taxpayers exempt from the tax. The FET was not a basis or authority for the City's imposition of the UUT. D. On May 25, 2006, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") issued its Revenue Notice 2006-50 which announced that the IRS was no longer interpreting the FET as applying to wireless communications which were billed based on time only without consideration of the distance of the call. This revenue ruling reversed the historical interpretation and practice of the IRS as it relates to wireless telephone services and further reversed prior IRS Revenue Ruling 79-404 which held that telephone services which are billed based only on time are subject to the FET, and upon which the City relied in collecting the UUT. As a result of Revenue Notice 2006-50, effective August 1, 2006, the FET will no longer be applicable to long distance calls billed on time only, and certain other "bundled" services. E. The City of Santa Ana does not want to apply the new IRS interpretation to the UUT, but rather continue to apply its UUT to all telephone services as it has historically and consistent with the IRS Ruling 79-404. The Ordinance No. NS-2723 Page 1015 amendments continue to recognize and retain the prior FET exemptions that existed prior to May 25, 2006. F. Santa Ana has always taxed all types of telephone communication services and has amended its ordinances in the past only to keep up with the advances in technology in order to continue to capture UUT for the range of telephone services already taxed. G. The proposed amendments restate the telephone communication services that are subject to the UUT. Only those telephone communications services that were taxed before Revenue Notice 2006-50 will continue to be taxed. H. The amendments do not increase or create a new tax on telephone communication services, and neither extend the effective period of the UUT, nor modify any sunset provision or expiration date of the UUT. I. Some telephone communication services providers have notified the City that they intend to cease collection of the tax or will collect taxes under protest in light of Revenue Notice 2006-50 resulting in irreparable loss of general revenues to the City. J. All of the foregoing findings form the basis required by section 415 of the city charter for adoption of an urgency ordinance necessary to avoid harm to the public peace, health & safety. Section 2. Section 35-153 (n) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code IS hereby amended such that it reads as: "(n) Telephone Communication Services shall mean any telephonic quality communication that is interconnected to the public switched network [as defined in 47 U.S.CA Section 332(d), as amended from time to time, and the regulations of the Federal Communications Commission], and shall include, without limitation, the transmission of messages or information (including but not limited to voice, telegraph, teletypewriter, data, facsimile, video, or text) or any other transmission of messages or information by electronic, radio or similar means, whether such transmission occurs by wire, cable, fiber-optic, light wave, laser, microwave, radio wave [including, but not limited to, cellular service, personal communications service (PCS), specialized mobile radio (SMR), and other types of mobile telecommunications regardless of radio spectrum used], switching facilities, satellite or any other similar facilities. Except where inconsistent with the foregoing, Telephone Communication Services shall also mean a "communications service" as defined in Sections 4251, 4252 and 4253 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Federal Communications Excise Tax" or "FEr). Telephone Communication Services shall not include "private mobile radio service" [as defined in Part 20 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations as amended from time to time], which is not interconnected to the public switched network." Ordinance No. NS-2723 Page 2 of 5 Section 3. Section 35-155 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 35-155. Telephone users tax. "(a) There is hereby imposed a tax upon every person in the City of Santa Ana using Telephone Communication Services as defined in Section 35-153(n), above, including services for intrastate, interstate or international calls. The tax imposed by this section shall be at the rate of six (6) percent of all charges made for such services and shall be collected from the service user by the telephone communication services supplier or its billing agent. To the extent allowed by law, the tax on telephone communication services shall apply to a service user if the billing or service address of the service user is within the city's boundaries. If the billing address of the service user is different from the service address, the service address of the service user shall be used. (b) The tax imposed under subsection (a), above, shall not be imposed upon any person for using Telephone Communication Services to the extent that the amounts paid for such services are exempt from or are not subject to the Federal Communications Excise Tax as it was interpreted by the Internal Revenue Service prior to May 25, 2006. In the event that the Federal Communications Excise Tax is repealed, any reference in this section to such law, shall refer to that body of law, that existed immediately prior to the date of repeal. (c) The tax administrator, from time to time, may issue administrative rulings clarifying those Telephone Communication Services that are subject to the tax of subsection (a) above. These administrative rulings shall be for the purpose of ensuring that despite changes in communications technologies and practices, or changes in body of federal law referred to in this Article, the tax remains applicable to all of those services intended by this Article, to the extent not preempted by the State of California or the United States of America. In no event, shall such administrative rulings be interpreted or have the effect of imposing a new tax, revising any existing tax methodology, or increasing an existing tax. (d) As used in this section, the term "charges" shall include the value of any other services, credits, property of every kind or nature, or other consideration provided by the service user in exchange for the telephone communication services. If a non-taxable service and a taxable service are billed together under a single charge, the entire charge shall be deemed taxable unless the service supplier can reasonably identify charges not subject to the utility users tax based upon its books and records that are kept in the regular course of business, which shall be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. The term "charges" shall not include charges for services paid for by inserting coins in coin-operated telephones except that where such coin-operated telephone service is furnished for a guaranteed amount, the amounts paid under such guarantee plus any fixed monthly or other periodic charge shall be included in the base for computing the amount of tax due. (e) To prevent actual multi-jurisdictional taxation of telephone communication services subject to tax under this section, any service user, upon proof to the tax administrator that the service user has previously paid the same tax in another state or city on such Ordinance No. NS.2723 Page 3 of 5 telephone communication service, shall be allowed a credit against the tax imposed to the extent of the amount of such tax legally imposed in such other state or city; provided, however, the amount of credit shall not exceed the tax owed to the city under this section. For purposes of establishing sufficient legal nexus for the imposition and collection of utility users tax on charges for telephone communication services pursuant to this code, "minimum contacts" shall be construed broadly in favor of the imposition and collection of the utility users tax to the fullest extent permitted by California and federal law, and as it may change from time to time. (f) The tax imposed in this section shall be collected from the service user by the service supplier or its billing agent. The amount of tax collected in one (1) month shall be remitted to the tax administrator on or before the twentieth (20th) day of the following month in accordance with section 35-163 of this code." Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption by a 2/3 vote of the members of the City Council. It shall be of no further force and effect upon Ordinance No. NS-2721 becoming effective. ADOPTED this 7'h day of AUQust 2006 ~ Miguel A. Pulido May?r 0 ' A1.J'1..!) (S+ "f\:ftorney Councilmembers Alvarez. Bist. Bustamante. Christv. Garcia. Solorio (6) NOES: Councilmembers None (0) ABSTAIN: Councilmembers None (0) NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Pulido (1) Ordinance No. NS-2723 Page 4 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-2723 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Auaust 7. 2006, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter ~~~ej::~f Sant~ Ana. I Date: o/y- h? ./ - ( / Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana / Ordinance No. NS-2723 Page 5 of 5