The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About FULL PACKET_2006-09-18REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE ABANDONMENT NO. 06-02: TO VACATE PORTIONS OF COLLEGE AVENUE, 15Tx STREET AND MARTHA LANE CIT MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15f Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Adopt a resolution declaring the City's intent to vacate portions of College Avenue, 15th Street and Martha Lane. 2. Set a public hearing for October 16, 2006. DISCUSSION The Rancho Santiago Community College District is planning an expansion of the Santa Ana College campus in accordance with their master plan. As part of the expansion, the applicant is requesting that College Avenue between Washington Avenue and 17th Street, and portions of 15th Street and Martha Lane be vacated (Exhibits 1 and 2). The vacated streets will be incorporated into the expanded campus. Cul- de-sacs will be built at the east ends of the remaining portions of Martha Lane and 15th Street. Easements for the City's water and sewer facilities as well as for existing gas lines and overhead utilities will be reserved in the resolution of vacation. The proposed resolution will declare the City's intent to abandon its easement at this location. In addition, the resolution will set a public hearing for October 16, 2006. City staff has been working with the Rancho Santiago Community College District to expand the Santa Ana College campus and fully support the vacation of the street to accommodate the expansion. 12A-1 Abandonment No. 06-02 September 18, 2006 Page 2 BNVIRONMLNTAL IMPACT The abandonment is adequately addressed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared by the Rancho Santiago Community College District. No further CEQA analysis is required. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. ~, -~ ~i ~~ James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency 12A-2 i J F- (/~ C r- PROPOSED ABANDONMENT SITE EXHIBIT 1 SANTA ANA Title= ggANDONMENT NO. 06-02 P W A DATE= VACATE PORTIONS 4F COLLEGE AVENUE, SEPT. 18, 2006 15TH STREET, AND MARTHA LANE ~~~ ~~~O~P~' ~~~RG~p~ G0~(- GO 17TH STREET a 1611Y s SANTA ANA ~ Z eOLLEGE W 0 U MARTHA LANE a~ PROPOSED ABANDONMENT EXHIBIT 2 SANTA ANA ~ Title ABANDONMENT NO. 06-02 P• ~ A • DATE VACATE PORTIONS OF COLLEGE AVENUE, SEPT. 18, 2006 15TH STREET, AND MARTHA LANE II.C .OftlK .fflL, - - - - i 9/12/06 LES RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE PORTIONS OF COLLEGE AVENUE, 15T" STREET AND MARTHA LANE, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON, AND DIRECTING NOTICE THEREOF TO BE POSTED AND PUBLISHED (ABANDONMENT NO. 06-02) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, this Council does hereby declare its intention to vacate portions of College Avenue between Washington Avenue and 17th Street, and portions of 15th Street and Martha Lane. The proposed abandonment area is shown on the maps labeled Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 2. Notice is hereby given that at the hour of 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard on October 16, 2006, in the Santa Ana Police Community Room at 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, a public hearing will be held by this Council at which time any and all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation hereinabove described may appear and be heard. 3. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to cause this Resolution to be published twice, once in each of the two successive weeks prior to the abovesaid hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. 4. The Executive Director of the Public Works Agency is hereby directed to post conspicuously, in the manner prescribed by law, notice of the adoption of this Resolution, containing the statement of the day, hour and place of hearing hereinabove set forth, and describing the portion of the sidewalk area to be vacated at least two weeks before the date set for said hearing. 1 12A-5 9/12/06 LES ADOPTED this day of , 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006- to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 2 12A-6 I i L J m C r~ PROPOSED ABANDONMENT SITE EXHIBIT 1 SANTA ANA /~ Title ABANDONMENT NO. 06-02 P~ ~ A ~ DATE= VACATE PORTIONS 4F COLLEGE AVENUE, SEPT. 18, 2006 15TH STREET, AND MARTHA LANE ~,~ t~~aG`~ ~~~RG`P~ Gp~ Gp 17TH STREET PROPOSED ABANDONMENT EXHIBIT 2 SANTA ANA ~ Title ABANDONMENT NO. 06-02 ^ P• ~ A .• DATE VACATE PORTIONS OF COLLEGE AVENUE, ~/ SEPT. 18, 2006 15TH_STREET, AND MARTHA LANE i F--~ WASHINGTON AVENUE CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON (~ NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT/CODE ENFORCEMENT Meeting Minutes July 31, 2006 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:42 p.m. in Training Room 1602, City Hall Ross Annex. ATTENDANCE The following Council members were present: Lisa Bist, Alberta Christy and Carlos Bustamante Staff present were: Jay Trevino, Executive Director Planning and Building Agency; Kenneth Adams, Assistant Director Planning and Building Agency; Ben Kaufman, Chief Assistant City Attorney; Bruce Dunams, Community Preservation Manager; and Will Hayes, Project Manager, Public Works Agency. AGENDA-ITEMS 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. June 27, 2006 Meeting B. July 25, 2006 Meeting Cancelled Approved by a vote of 3:0 2. SHOPPING CART CONTAINMENT ORDINANCE Bruce Dunams provided a detailed overview of the staff proposal to address the shopping cart issues of the greater Santa Ana community. In addition to the staff proposal, he also provided the committee with a cart retrieval survey conducted by staff that provides information from store managers regarding the cart retrieval system at their respective place of business. Mr. Dunams provided details of the staff proposal which include two primary elements. These elements focus on (1) containing a merchant's shopping carts on- site, and (2) retrieving them in these hopefully rare instances where the carts have been taken off-site. His proposal generated a number of questions and comments from the committee members. Mr. Kaufman provided the committee members with a legal synopsis of the activities of other communities including Buena Park, Anaheim and Long Beach. He suggested the committee be prudent in recommending an appropriate sunrise clause in the legislation so as to give all interested parties an opportunity to prepare for the program's implementation. 13B-1 The following individuals spoken on behalf of proposed legislation: George Kunz, Ray Gawronski, Evangeline Gawronski, Lynnette Verino, Debbie McEwen, Julie Stroud, Bertha Rivera, Dorothy Newhouse, Ann Moore, Mark Guzman, Mary Guzman, Rita Corpin, Maria Rodriguez, Francisco Risotto, Rick Edge, Judy Edge, Darren Shipman, Dave Hollerer, Jeff Dickman, Ester Trujillo 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS One Morrison Park resident asked that the council be conscious of the court's placement of residents into half way houses that are operating in neighborhoods adjacent to the civic center complex. 4. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS -None 5. ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING A. Shopping. Carts 6. ~ NEXT MEETING DATE: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 ADJOURNMENT - 7:02 P.M. Kenneth Adams Assistant Director Planning & Building Agency KA/rb S: Council CommMICE CCMICE Minutes 07-31-08 Neighborhood Improvement/Code 2 July 31, 2006 Enforcement Council Committee Minutes 13B-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15t Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize submittal of the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING COMMISSION ACTION 1. Receive public comment on the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report for fiscal year 2005-06. 2. Authorize submittal of the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. By a vote of 5:0 (Turner, Welty absent) at its Regular Meeting of September 5, 2006. DISCUSSION The Consolidated Five Year Plan is a comprehensive planning document that identifies a jurisdiction's overall need for affordable and supportive housing, community development programs, social services and economic opportunities. The Plan outlines a strategy for using four federal programs and other resources to meet those needs. Those programs are Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), HOME Partnership (HOME), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) The Plan also identifies five-year numeric goals for meeting the needs that the jurisdiction will seek to achieve during the period covered by the Plan. As part of the Consolidated Plan process, the City is required to submit annually a Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), 19C-1 CITY MANAGER Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report September 18, 2006 Page 2 Exhibit 1. The CAPER describes the activities and accomplishments for these federal programs during fiscal year 2005-06, and the City's success in achieving the five-year objectives that were established in the Consolidated Five Year Plan. Fiscal year 2005-06 is the first year covered by the Consolidated Five Year Plan for 2005-09. The following table shows accomplishments achieved for selected objectives during this fiscal year. ACTUAL 5-YEAR $ OF 5-YEAR GOAL ACTIVITY 5-YEAR GOAL ACCOMPLISF~NT ATTAINED (AFTER Z YR) (AFTER 1 YR) Ownership Housing i 't 26.4% Un ts Un s Rental Housing t 38.20 Units Uni s Emergency Shelter 4,050 1,100 27.20 Individuals Individuals Transitional 1,000 83 Housing Individuals Individuals 8.30 Senior Services 0 23.20 Individ uals Individuals Youth Services 50,000 11,611 23.2% Individuals Individuals Code Enforcement 22,500 3,706 16.50 Housing Units Housing Units Street Improvements projects Projects 1000 Park Improvements projects Project 25o U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations require that the CAPER be available for a 15-day public review prior to being submitted to HUD. On August 20, 2006, a public notice was published in the Orange County Register indicating that the draft report was available for review beginning August 21, 2006. The minimum 15-day public comment period closed at noon on September 5, 2006. The Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission held a public hearing on September 5, 2006, and all comments received are included in the final document to be submitted to HUD no later than September 29, 2006. 19C-2 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report September 18, 2006 Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. ~/ ~ '" Ste hen G . I-~rding Deputy City Manager for Development Services SGH/SLB/mlr H:\ACTIONS\2006 CC\ConAnnPerEvalRpt 9-18-06.doc 19C-3 19C-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR CONCRETE METER BOXES AND LIDS (SPEC. NO. 04-095) '(~~ CITY ANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15~ Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Renew the contract with Eisel Enterprises, Inc. for the purchase of concrete water valve boxes and lids for a one-year period in an annual amount not to exceed $11,000. DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency requires an assortment of concrete boxes and lids that are used to house water valves in various locations throughout the City. Concrete water valve boxes and lids are purchased through the Central Stores warehouse for distribution to the Public Works Agency as needed. The contract is designed to provide quality products at significant savings based on quantity pricing. On September 20, 2004, the City Council awarded a contract to Eisel Enterprises, Inc. for a one-year period, with provision for three, one-year renewals. The vendor has agreed to renew the contract; however, the vendor has requested a three percent increase due to increased fuel and insurance costs. The vendor has performed satisfactorily during the past contract period; and staff recommends the second renewal of the contract. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Water Utility Water System Maintenance Operating Materials & Supplies account (account no. 64-575-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~~ ~~~~ James G. Ross Executive Director i Public Works Agency i~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency/_ JGR/WO/04-095R.9:uc 2 2/'~-1 22A-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR INMATE BATH TOWELS & LINENS (SPEC. NO. 05-082) C TY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1s1 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Renew the contract with Leslee Scott, Inc. for the purchase inmate bath towels and linens for a one-year period in an annual amount to exceed $10,750. DISCUSSION The City of Santa Ana maintains a 480-bed holding facility which houses federal, Santa Ana, and juvenile inmates. Under Title 15 of the Board of Corrections Minimum Standards for Jails, the Santa Ana Holding Facility is required to provide clean bath towels and linen to all inmates upon incarceration and must provide an exchange of clean linen on a weekly basis while the inmates are in custody. Each inmate is provided with one blanket, two sheets, one pillowcase, and one towel. In order to maintain sufficient inventory of bath towels and linens to meet the mandated requirement and allow for continuous supply during the laundering and exchange process, staff requests quarterly shipments. On September 6, 2005, the City Council awarded a contract to Leslee Scott, Inc. for a one-year period with provision for two, one-year renewals. The vendor has agreed to renew the contract; however, the vendor has requested a two percent increase in pricing due to manufacturer price increases. The vendor has performed satisfactorily during the past contract period and staff recommends the first renewal of the contract. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Police Property & Facilities Operating Materials & Supplies account (account no. 11-343-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: i Paul M. Walters Chief of Police PMW/SP/05-082R.7:uc "~ Francisco Gutierrez '7`. Executive Director 226_1 Finance & Mgmt . Services Agency/ 22B-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR LIBRARY CATALOGING AND PURCHASE OF BOOKS AND MATERIALS (SPEC.. NO. 05-089) (v_L / CIT MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15t Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Renew the contract with Brodart Company for cataloging services and the purchase of books and materials for a six-month period in the amount not to exceed $261,305. DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Library has contracted with the Brodart Company for over eleven years for the purchase of books and materials, as well as for cataloging services. Brodart performs the necessary function of identifying new books by affixing labels and cataloging in accordance with Library direction. Over 35,000 books, 89% of the library's annual book acquisitions, are either purchased from or processed by Brodart. On September 6, 2005, the City Council awarded a contract to Brodart Company for a one-year period. The vendor has performed satisfactorily during the past contract period and continues to provide the City with discounts ranging from 10 to 45 percent. Brodart has been identified as the primary vendor for Spanish language book cataloguing on the west coast. However, staff will be soliciting proposals to determine if there are other vendors. The recommended action will allow for uninterrupted service to the Library while bids are solicited for a long-term contract. 22C-1 Contract Renewal for Library books and Materials September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Technology & Support Services Operating Materials & Supplies Other Contractual Services accounts (account nos.ll- 216-6391 and 11-216-6291); Adult and Youth Services Books Records Video accounts (account nos. 11-212-6651 and 11-213-6651); and Adult and Youth Services Operating Materials & Supplies accounts (account nos. 11-212-6391 and 11-213-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: % /~ . i i i ' % / ; ~ , REhY'S Richard Library Director RR/BP/05-089R.4:uc Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 22C-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR STREET SWEEPERS (SPEC. NO. 06-008) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 151 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Amend the contract to Haaker Equipment Company for the purchase of one compressed natural gas street sweeper in the amount of $257,583.92. DISCUSSION The Fleet Maintenance Division's annual Equipment Replacement Program is included in the City's annual budget and identifies vehicles scheduled for replacement. Funding is monitored through a depreciation schedule established with each department. Additionally, the Fleet Division reviews the acquisition in accordance with the City's Hybrid and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Policy. The compressed natural gas (CNG) sweeper complies with the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) standards for alternative fuel street sweepers. The Public Works Agency uses 11 street sweepers to cover over 300 miles of residential streets, 100 miles of primary streets, 50 miles of industrial areas; and 25 miles of alleys. The program also includes sweeping over 81,000 curb miles and the removal of 11,000 cubic yards of gutter litter each year. Due to age, engine hours, and condition, the last 1999 diesel Athey sweeper has been approved for replacement in the current fiscal year. To comply with AQMD standards, the new street sweeper will be a CNG unit. Specifications for the new sweeper also call for a high right side dump hopper system to accommodate proper disposal directly to the Waste Management trash dumpsters. On March 20, 2006, the City Council awarded a contract to Haaker Equipment Company for the purchase of two CNG street sweepers. The vendor has offered to extend the same terms and conditions for one additional Mechanical Broom street sweeper. Therefore, staff recommends amending the contract with Haaker Equipment Company. 22D-1 Contract Amend for Street Sweepers September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Equipment Replacement Machinery & Equipment account (account no. 76-145-6641). .~ ~5~~~~ ~ ~ ~ . z~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency ~ FG/KM/06-008A.2:uc 22D-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE:' CONTRACT AMENDMENT POLICE.K-9 SEDANS (SPEC. NO. 06-009) CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended FOR ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 151 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Amend the contract with Bros. Dodge Riverside, formerly known as Moss Motors Dodge, for the purchase of two vehicles in the amount of 54,704.94, for a total amount of $109,409.88. DISCUSSION The Fleet Maintenance Division's annual Equipment Replacement Program is included in the City's annual budget, and identifies vehicles scheduled for replacement. Funding is monitored through a depreciation schedule established with each department. Additionally, the Fleet Division reviews the acquisition in accordance with the City's Hybrid and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Policy. Currently, hybrid vehicles are not manufactured in the configuration requirements that would support K-9 operations in large wagon vehicles. The Police Department's K-9 patrol vehicles are used to transport police officers and their canine partners to perform routine business. The Police Canine Unit tested several full-sized vehicles in search of a new line of K-9 sedans. Vehicles are graded and assessed on such features as safety for both the officers and the dogs, driving performance, and storage capacity. The Dodge Magnum was evaluated and approved by the Santa Ana Police Department as the new K-9 vehicle. Due to age and condition, two 1999 Ford K-9 sedans have been approved for replacement in the current fiscal year. On February 6, 2006, the City Council awarded a contract to Bros. Dodge Riverside for the purchase of two Dodge Magnum vehicles. The vendor has offered to extend the same terms and conditions for two additional Dodge Magnum vehicles. Therefore, staff recommends amending the contract with Bros. Dodge Riverside. 22E-1 Contract Amend for Police K-9 Sedans September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Equipment Replacement Machinery & Equipment account (account no. 76-145-6641) ~ . Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency~~ FG/KM/06-009A.2:uc 22E-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE:. CONTRACT AWARD FOR OVERHEAD DOOR MAINTENANCE (SPEC. NO. 06-092) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15t Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Vortex Industries, Inc. for overhead door maintenance for a two-year period with provision for three, one-year renewals in an amount not to exceed $13,428 annually. DISCUSSION The City utilizes various overhead doors that require maintenance and repair. Included are 36 front and rear apparatus room overhead doors at the Fire Department's 10 fire stations and the parking garages at the Depot and City Hall. These doors are operated several times daily, seven days a week. A preventive maintenance contract is essential to ensure full function and response at all times. The contract provides for regularly scheduled maintenance, and 24-hour emergency repair response as well as miscellaneous repairs and parts. The notice inviting bids was advertised on July 28 and 31, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 6 Invitations For Bid mailed 2 Bids mailed to Santa Ana vendors 3 Bids received 1 Bid received from a Santa Ana Vendor Bids were received, opened on August 17, 2006, and evaluated (Exhibit 1). The bid received from Vortex Industries, Inc. is responsive to the specification and meets the City's requirements. 22F-1 Contract Award for Door Repair September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Fire Maintenance Other Contractual Services; the Building Maintenance Other Contractual Services; and the Regional Transportation Center Maintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds accounts (account nos. 11-327-6291, 73-105-6291, and 67-615-6261). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~~t ~~~ ~a ~ ~, ;~~Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency' PMG/SGH/BP/06-092.321:uc 22F-2 ~~ ~~ ~~ Ste e G. Ha ing Deputy City Manager for Development Services ABSTRACT OF BIDS CONTRACT AWARD FOR OVERHEAD DOOR MAINTENANCE (Spec. 06-092) Vendor Vortex Commercial Action Door Industries, Inc. Door of Orange Repair Corp. County Location Costa Mesa Santa Ana Garden Grove Annual Maint. -Ten Fire Stations $ 2,549.00 $ 4,508.00 $ 7,790.00 Annual Maint. -City Hall $ 399.80 $ 1,176.00 $ 760.00 Annual Maint. -The Depot $ 479.80 $ 1,568.00 $ 1,200.00 Parts, Labor, Emergency Services $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Not Included in Annual Maint. Total Annual Amount $ 13,428.60 $ 17,252.00 $ 19,750.00 Exhibit 1 22F-3 22F-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF FITNESS EQUIPMENT (SPEC. NO. 06-108) ~.~C~--- CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15' Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Reject the bid from Fitness Select as nonresponsive to the specification. 2. Award a contract to Advantage Fitness Products for the purchase and installation of exercise equipment in the amount of $10,996. DISCUSSION The Fire Department has established a physical fitness program for fire personnel. Firefighters are assigned a one-hour workout period per shift and are tested yearly to determine if they are in compliance with fitness requirements. The installation of physical fitness equipment at all fire stations encourages firefighters to exercise regularly while readily responding to calls for service. The notice inviting bids was advertised on July 7 and 10, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 24 Invitations For Bid mailed 3 Invitations For Bid mailed to Santa Ana vendors 3 Bids received Bids were received, opened on August 15, 2006, and evaluated (Exhibit 1). The bid from Fitness Select was considered nonresponsive, as it contained substitute equipment instead of the items listed in the specifications. The bid received from Advantage Fitness Products is responsive to the specifications and meets the City's requirements. 22G-1 Contract Award for Fitness Equipment September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Fire Training Operating Materials & Supplies account (account no. 11-325-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: \~~a~~ a ~~~ a," Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency .~ 22G-2 ABSTRACT OF BIDS CONTRACT AWARD FOR FITNESS EQUIPMENT (SPEC. NO. 06-108) Advantage Fitness Products Location: Terms: Subtotal: Installation Shipping Charge (no tax) Los Angeles Net 30 $9,647.00 $ 200.00 (taxed) $ 385.00 Total: $10,995.14 (Including 7.75% Sales Tax) Coast Fitness Fitness Select Riverside Orange Net 30 Net 30 $10,069.00 N/R $ 150.00(no tax) N/R $ 100.00 N/R $11,099.35 N/R N/R= Non Responsive Bid EXHIBIT 1 22G-3 22G-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR GLOCK GUNS (SPEC. NO. 06-119) RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15i Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Proforce Law Enforcement for the purchase of 35 Glock guns in the amount of $23,712. DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Police Department currently utilizes Glock-manufactured weapons as standard issue side arms to allow for standardization in training. The standardization also allows for ammunition magazine interchangeability between officers. The recommended action will allow for replenishment of inventory and for issuance of a new weapon to academy recruits. The notice inviting bids was advertised July 21 and 24, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 7 Invitations For Bid mailed 3 Invitations For Bid received Bids were received and opened July 31, 2006 (Exhibit 1). The bid received from Proforce Law Enforcement is responsive to the specification and meets the Police Department's requirements. The award amount includes a contingency to facilitate the purchase of additional miscellaneous supplies and accessories on an as-needed basis. 22H-1 CITY MANAGER Contract Award for Glock Guns September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds area available in the Police Property & Facilities Operating Materials & Supplies account (account no. 11-343-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: l I Paul M. Walters ~ Francisco Gutierrez Chief of Police Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency PMW/SP/06-119.7:uc 22H-2 ABSTRACT OF BIDS CONTRACT AWARD FOR GLOCK GUNS SPEC. NO. 06-119 Vendor PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT L. C. ACTION E. G. S. W., INC. POLICE SUPPLY Location BREA SAN JOSE ORANGE Subtotal $12,725.40 $12,735.00 $13,225.00 7.75% Tax $986.22 $986.96 $1,024.94 Misc. Supplies $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Total $23,711.62 $23,721.96 $24,249.94 Exhibit 1 22H-3 22H-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR REMOTE WATER CHILLERS (SPEC.. NO. 06-128) L/ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Irvine Pipe & Supply, Inc. for the purchase of remote water chillers in the amount of $15,980. DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency's Water Resources Division uses chlorine generation units to treat water pumped from most of the City's wells and pump stations. The units automatically shut off when the water temperature exceeds a specified level. The recent high air temperatures caused the units to shut off repeatedly. Installation of the remote water chillers will allow the units to have a higher tolerance for warm weather. As a result, the units will last longer, and operate more efficiently during warm weather. The notice inviting bids was advertised on August 11 and 14, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 14 Invitations For Bid mailed 6 Invitations For Bid mailed to Santa Ana vendors 2 Bids received 2 Bids received from Santa Ana vendors Bids were received, opened on August 29, 2006, and evaluated. Bid results are as follows: Vendor: Amount: Location: Irvine Pipe & Supply, Inc. $15,979.70 Santa Ana Plumbing and Industrial Supply $16,210.59 Santa Ana The bid received from Irvine Pipe & Supply, Inc., a Santa Ana vendor, is responsive to the specification and meets the City's requirements. 221-1 Contract Award for Remote Water Chillers September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Water Utility Water Production & Supply Operating Materials & Supplies account (account no. 64-574-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~t James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency ~n~~~' ~C . ~~~~. o Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency ~j' JGR/WO/06-128.9:uc 221-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR OLYMPUS DIGITAL RECORDERS & ACCESSORIES (SPEC. NO. 06-129) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Reject the bid from Troxell Communications as nonresponsive to the specification. 2. Award a contract to Martell Electronics, Inc. for the purchase of Olympus Digital Recorders and accessories in the amount of $17,103.16. DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Police Department Detective and Investigative Divisions require recorders to document suspect and witness interviews. The extended recording time using digital recorders is crucial during long interviews. With the use of digital recorders documents can be stored digitally into the SAPD Digital Imaging Management System (DIMS), which reduce the storage space needed in Evidence. The notice inviting bids was advertised on July 16 and 18, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 10 Invitations For Bid mailed 3 Bids received Bids were received, opened on August 23, 2006, and evaluated (Exhibit 1). The bid from Troxell Communications did not include all items listed in the specifications, and was therefore considered nonresponsive. The bid received from Martell Electronics, Inc. is responsive to the specifications and meets the City's requirements. 22J-1 Contract Award For Olympus Digital Recorders & Accessories September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Police Crimes Against Persons Operating Material & Supplies Account (account no. 11-341-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Paul M. Walters ~ Francisco Gutierrez Chief of Police Executive Director Finance & Mgmt . Services Agency ly,j'"" ~` PMW/SH/06-129.7:uc ABSTRACT OF BIDS ^^~~^ ABSTRACT OF BIDS CONTRACT AWARD FOR OLYMPUS DIGITAL RECORDERS AND ACCESSORIES (SPEC. NO. 06-129) Martel Versatile Information Electronics, Inc. Products, Inc. Location: Yorba Linda Terms: Net 30 Subtotal: $15,873.00 Discount: None Total: $17,103.16 Riverside Net 30 $15,907.45 None $17,140.28 EXHIBIT 1 All Makes Office Machines Los Angeles Net 30 $17,105.74 None $18,431.44 ~ 22J-3 22J-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR REPLACEMENT POLICE PATROL SEDANS (SPEC. NO. 06-136) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15f Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Wondries Fleet Group, under the Cooperative Purchase Provision of Los Angeles County, for the purchase of 16 police patrol sedans in the amount of $390,708.97. DISCUSSION The Fleet Maintenance Division maintains a replacement schedule for police patrol type vehicles that have accumulated at least 70,000 miles. The vehicles operate a minimum of 8-12 hours per day, often double shifts, under City conditions. As a result, each vehicle is evaluated based on age, mileage, and increased downtime. Additionally, the Fleet Division reviews the acquisition in accordance with the City's Hybrid and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Policy. Currently, hybrid vehicles are not available in the Full-size/Large class category that includes the Ford Crown Victoria sedan. Sixteen patrol vehicles between the years of 1994 to 1999 have been identified and approved for replacement for fiscal year 2006-2007. Twelve are assigned as patrol vehicles, three as non-patrol units with no light bar and one unit is assigned to the Parks Security Patrol Division of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency. Santa Ana City Ordinance No. NS-2312 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. The City of Los Angeles' contract with Wondries Fleet Group for police patrol sedans was awarded as a result of open, competitive bidding, and meets the City's requirements. 22K-1 Contract Award for Replacement Police Patrol Sedans September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Equipment Replacement Machinery & Equipment account (account no. 76-145-6641) ~F'rancisco Gutierrez ~ Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency FG/KM/06-136.2:uc 22K-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTENffiER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACTS AWARD FOR WATERWORKS FITTINGS (SPEC. NO. 06-123) RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1s1 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award contracts for waterworks fittings for a one-year period, with provision for four, one-year renewals in the annual aggregate amount not to exceed $27,000 with the following vendors: Bidder: Location: Dangelo Company La Habra Hughes Supply Rancho Santa Margarita National Waterworks, Inc. Corona S & J Supply Santa Fe Springs Wells Supply Santa Ana DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency requires an assortment of materials such as couplings, clamps, and pipes in order to perform maintenance and repairs on the City's water system. The materials are purchased through the Central Stores warehouse for distribution. The contract for the supplies is designed to provide quality products at significant savings based on quantity pricing. To help ensure that all necessary items are available when required, staff recommends awarding a contract to multiple vendors. Staff will continue to select the vendor offering the item needed at the lowest cost. The notice inviting bids was advertised on August 9 and 11, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 14 Invitations For Bid mailed 6 Invitations For Bid mailed to 5 Bids received 1 Bid received from a Santa Ana 22L-1 Santa Ana vendors vendor Contract Award for Waterworks Fittings September 18, 2006 Page 2 Bids were received, opened on August received from the recommended vendors and meet the City's requirements. 23, 2006, and evaluated. The bids are responsive to the specifications FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Water Utility Water Systems Maintenance Operating Materials & Supplies account (account no. 64-575-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ,.~ -~-~~ James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency ~~~~ ~i ~ • ~ _ ~ ~ o ~t~lFrancisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency ~~ JGR/WO/06-123.9:uc 22L-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACTS AWARD FOR WATERWORKS SUPPLIES (SPEC. NO. 06-124) (.,~ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1ST Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award contracts for waterworks supplies for a one-year period, with provision for four, one-year renewals in the annual aggregate amount not to exceed $37,000 with the following vendors: Bidder: Location: Categories: Dangelo Company S & J Supply DISCUSSION La Habra Santa Fe Springs A,F B, C, D, E In order to perform maintenance and repairs on the City's water systems, the Public Works Agency requires an assortment of materials such as valves, adapters, and gaskets. The materials are purchased through the Central Stores' warehouse for distribution. The contracts for the supplies are designed to provide quality products at significant savings based on quantity pricing. The notice inviting bids was advertised on August 9 and 11, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 15 Invitations For Bid mailed 6 Invitations For Bid mailed to Santa Ana vendors 4 Bids received Bids were received, opened on August 23, 2006, and evaluated (Exhibit 1). The bids received from the recommended vendors are responsive to the specifications and meet the City's requirements. 22M-1 Contract Award for Waterworks Fittings September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Water Utility Water System Maintenance Operating Material & Supplies account (account no. 64-575-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: James G. Ross ~ Executive Director Public Works Agency ~~Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency~*' .,- JGR/WO/06-124.9:uc 22M-2 ABSTRACT OF BIDS CONTRACT AWARD FOR WATERWORKS SUPPLIES (06-124) S & J Dangelo Hughes HD National Supply Company Company Supply Waterworks, Inc. Location Santa Fe Springs La Habra Rancho Santa Corona Margarita Terms Net 30 Net 30 Net 30 Net 30 CENTRAL STORES STOCK ITEMS A Flange Adapters $ 947.10 $ 894.00 $ 894.00 $ 1,029.06 B Gaskets $ 184.00 $ 247.50 $ 475.00 $ 390.50 C Solid Sleeves $ 3,146.64 $ 3,252.00 $ 3,216.00 $ 4,944.72 D Tees $ 1,226.28 $ 1,260.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 1,719.60 E Gate Valves $ 28,184.40 $ 28,336.00 $ 28,918.00 $ 36,150.46 F Miscellaneous No Bid $ 411.50 $ 452.00 $ 863.00 Estimated Annual Usage Stock Items (Incl. Sales Tax) $ 35,000.00 $ 2,000.00 N/A N/A 2~AA~3 1 22M-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR CALL RECORDING SYSTEM MAINTENANCE (SPEC. NO. 06-138) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Nice Systems for maintenance coverage on the Police Department Communication Recording System for a one-year period, with provision for two, one-year renewals in the annual amount not to exceed $14,000. DISCUSSION The Police Department communication recording system provides the permanent storage of all incoming 911 calls and Police officers radio transmissions covering all emergency and non-emergency calls. The communication records are subpoenaed for court cases and reviewed for standard police procedures. In order for the Dictaphone Guardian communication recording system to operate 24/7, maintenance services offered by Nice Systems, the sole authorized provider by Dictaphone on the Guardian System, is contracted. The Police Building opened in 1998 and maintenance coverage on the Dictaphone Guardian communication recording system started. With approximately an eight percent rate increase annually, our yearly cost is exceeding $10,000 and requires Council approval. To provide proper service and all needed emergency repairs, staff recommends approval of the recommended action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Police Communication Services Other Contractual Services account (account no. 11-346-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS & ACCOUNTS: Paul M. Walters Chief of Police Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency~i PMW/KM/06-138.7:uc 2 2 N ~~ 22N-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR TROPHIES, PLAQUES AND AWARDS (SPEC. NO. 05-084) .-- CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 151 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Amend the contract with Players Choice for the purchase of trophies, plaques and awards for a two-year period by $15,000 for an annual amount not to exceed $45,000. DISCUSSION The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency's sports and youth guidance programs require trophies, medals, and plaque awards to recognize participants for their achievements in soccer, basketball, baseball, flag football, track and field, swimming, and Project P.R.I.D.E. In addition, various other agencies require plaque awards to recognize outstanding employees and citizens of the community. The contract for trophies, plaques, and awards is designed to provide quality products at significant savings based on quantity pricing. On November 7, 2005, the City Council awarded a contract to Players Choice, a Santa Ana vendor, for trophies, plaques and awards. Players Choice has provided quality products to the City for the past six years at competitive pricing. Due to the number of programs and level of participation, staff is projecting an increase in the purchase of trophies, plaques and awards. The recommended action provides the necessary funding for the remainder of the contract. 220-1 Contract Amendment September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT for Trophies, Plaques and Awards Funds are available in the various departmental Operating Materials & Supplies accounts (object code 6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Gerardo Mouet Executive Direc Parks, Rec. & C ~. .. `... Paul M. Walters Chief of Police r ~~ ~~~ , S~Francisco Gutierrez ^° r Executive Director m. Svcs. Agency ~ Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency~~,i Enrique/J. Alv ~ ~~ Execu ve Di e for Personnel S ices GM/PMW/EJA/WO/05-084A.875:uc 220-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR 2006/2007 OMNIBUS CONCRETE REPLACEMENT CONTRACT (PROJECT 07-1725) ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15f Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO ER MENDED ~dugtion 1st CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED FILE NUMBER 1. Award a contract Hardy & Harper, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices in an amount not to exceed $399,450.50 for construction of the 2006/2007 Omnibus Concrete Replacement Contract. 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $499,500. DISCUSSION This project will provide for replacement of damaged and deteriorated concrete sidewalks, curbs, gutters, cross gutters, wheelchair ramps, driveway approaches, and concrete pavement at various locations throughout the City. The work will be performed on an as-needed basis. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on July 31 and August 2, 2006 and bids were opened on August 24, 2006. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follows. Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: 3 Contractors requesting bidding documents: 9 Bids received: 3 Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 2 23A-1 Project 07-1725 2005/2006 Omnibus Concrete Replacement Contract October 3, 2005 Page 2 NAME OF BIDDER CITY BID AMOUNT 1. Hardy & Harper, Inc. Santa Ana $399,450.50 2. Accord Engineering, Inc. Santa Ana $504,805.00 3. Hardy & Harper, Inc. Costa Mesa $710,604.00 A total of three bids were received and all were responsive. The lowest bid was submitted by Hardy & Harper, Inc., for $399,450.50, which is above the Engineer's estimate of $337,347. IsNVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Categorical Exemption No. 2006-151 will be filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The funding analysis shows a total estimated construction cost of $499,500 for the project (Exhibit 1). Funds are available in the Select Street Construction Fund (account no. 59-551-6631) and the Measure M Construction Fund (account no. 32-551-6631). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~"r James G. oss Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Executive Director Public Works Agency Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency K:\Construction\RFCA-draft\07-1725 2006-09-18 omnibus 23A-2 FUNDING ANALYSIS PROJECT 07-1725 2006/2007 OMNIBUS CONCRETE REPLACEMENT CONTRACT Construction Contract Contract Administration Inspection and Testing Survey Staking Contingencies TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Exhibit 1 $399,451 18,504 35,600 6, 000 39, 945 5499,500 23A-3 23A-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: AUGUST 21, 2006 TITLE: ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS FOR PROMOTIONS IN THE DOWNTOWN APPROVED L~/+cs Recommended ~' As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CONTINUED TO -/-S-~~c;q-(~-Q~ FILE NUMBER 1. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with La Calle Cuatro de Santa Ana Association in an amount not to exceed $84, 240 for promotions and marketing efforts in the Downtown. T r~ ; T ~~l~e--~i~-~t~e~re~~e-~~ e}~e-~ ~--a t~ ~ h e ~ } ~ e ~ h e-~ ~ ~~-~4a ~~~ ~.r: a~d-r' ~ e ~ I~ e ~ ~ he Ee ee e ~~ ~e e~~~e~E-a~-~g~ee~e~-~~i ~~r ~ r nm n +- i n n c ~ n ~ .,, ~ ~,~~~~~_e ~ ~ A ~' ~ 6 ~ ~'3 ~ ~3 ~13eiai~e~?3-- # 2. Approved at the August 21, 2006 City Council Meeting. DISCUSSION On November 21, 2005, the City Council approved the 2005 Annual Report and the 2006 Budget for the Downtown Santa Ana Business Improvement District (BID). A portion of the approved budget included Downtown promotion and marketing activities totaling $162,000, of which $84,240 was allocated to La Calle Cuatro de Santa Ana Association and $77,760 was allocated to the Downtown Santa Ana Business Council. In June 2006, meetings were held with representatives from the La Calle Cuatro de Santa Ana Association ("LACCSA"), the Downtown Santa Ana Business Council ("DSABC"), and City staff to discuss the status of the 2005 B'ID promotion and marketing funds and the 2006 promotion and marketing funds that were previously approved by the City Council. Based on the information provided,`~LACCSA has expended its 2005 promotions and marketing funds on the various items outlined in its 2005 Budget, Exhibit A. The DSABC has completed approximately thirty percent of the items outlined in its 2005 Marketing Plan, Exhibit B. Both associations have made significant progress in promoting the Downtown area; and over the last year, events have increased in size and attendance. 25A-1 Enter into Agreements for Promotions in the Downtown August 21, 2006 Page 2 The Downtown Santa Ana Business Council and La Calle Cuatro de Santa Ana Association have submitted marketing plans for the use of the 2006 Downtown Business Improvement District promotions funds and have requested that the City enter into agreements with them. Copies of the LACCSA and the DSABC 2006 Marketing Plans have been attached as Exhibit C and D respectively. The agreements will detail the respective promotional/marketing programs with appropriate financial oversight by City staff. Staff recommends that the City approve both Agreements allowing the LACCSA and the DSABC to continue with their promotional/marketing plans. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available for these Agreements in the Business Improvement District Operations Other Contractual Services Account (account no. 93- 013-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~~~~ ' Stephen G. H ding Deputy City Manager for Development Services ~~~~~- ~~~~ Francisco Gutierrez ~~ Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency SGH/WRM/mlr H:\ACTIONS\2006 CC\AgreePromotions - DT 8-21-06.doc 25A-2 1A CQaA CtlOhp ~ SQ~O ~1O a! OCIQ~O[11f1C Badget 2005 Promotions • Wod Pagc - • Banners- For Events to bo displayed ' • Nevrspapu atmounoements - Adverd ~ancat • Radio ~cx+cials • Coansaltant end Caniract nwiews • Musicians !artists / perftnmers • Aft Thanksgiving Sale -banners, a' tvcitiscxncnt, etc. • Santa Sunday - Navidad en la Cane t uatro cvcalt, mus ;toys, snow • Event expea~sos - Litter Deposit, Met ~ Foe l~cposit, p rt-a-potties, permit foe, eta • Newsletter • Other Spxaal Events • Administrative & Operating Costs. Marketing • l~ircctory of businesses • SPo~P P~~Ba • Marketing matorials • Conference cacpenses / networking sa liners Printing cysts • Consultsmt and Contract rtiwicws • Seminar / vourses • Other Marlccting Methods Fundraiser Networking /Auctions -seminar volt items to be auc~ ned, etc. • Catering , conferenoc rooms, musicim ~ • Advertisment, publicity cxpc~.sc • Printing Materials • Consltant & Adrninistrativc.Costs ~ Other Fundraising metlxxls Exhibit A 25A-3 A TA ANA BUSINESS COUNCIL DOWNTOWN S N June 15, 2005 1~Ggue1 A. Pulido, Mayor City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Post Office Box 1988 Santa Ana, GA 92702 RE: Business Improvement District Dear Mtguel: BID Budget A v" o y Boards. We hereby formally ask the City Council to recognize and appoint die Downtown Santa Ana Business Council as the BID Advisory Board, anon-profit organization representing the interest of the Downtown Restaurant Association, the Artists Village Neighborhood Assodation, the Loft Neighborhood Assodation, and other Retail and Professional services within the geographic area commonly refesed to as Zone B (representing 48% of the BID funds). Downtown Santa Any Business Cnund Promotions and Marketing Plan (~rooo~d) -Budget S67 975.67 1- Create a professional handout MAP with all galleries/restaurants/attractions 2-Utilize and update current website"aplaceforartorg"- possibly change site so each gallery and businesses can update their awn info 3- Create new "branding"/ logo for the artists village/restaurant association 4 Research signage improvement- a-eate a way to recognize/ define the boundaries of the artists village and restaurant corridor (4'~ and Birch down Broadway to 2°a Street) (i.e. have all the street signs in a distinguished color or funky frames); update current banners 5- Initiate a public art program and try to get public art installations ("Santa Ana Salon" contest) 6- Fund neighborhood block party (like Wilshire Square and other neighborhoods assoaations) 7- Initiate a 2°a mondily event that focuses on music 8- Research cross-promotion with the Long Beach art walk 9- Seed money to create self-funded events Qazz Festival) 10- Create Downtown Restaurant collateral piece and distribute to area neighborhoods 11. General advertisement in local publications Amendment to the 2005 Approved BID Opp Expenses /Budget "Ihe Downtown Santa Ana Business Council respectfully requests that the City Council amend the 2005 budget in the following way-. Reallocate the "Maintenance d litter Enhancement Downtown lighting'' line item of $52.500 as well as the `BID Consultant's item of $15,000 totalt$67,500 be to the general BID promotions and marketing fund. Exhibit 6 2 5A-4 Thank you for your consideration. -2- June 15, 2005 Sincerely Gam` Downtown Santa Ma Business Council Bob Stewart, President cc: City Council Members David Ream Gty Manager City Clerk Patricia Whitaker, Executive Director William R Manis Exhibit B 25A-5 LA CALLE CUATRO DE SANTA ANA ASSOCTION INC. Budget 2006 Promotions * Up-date web page and increase membership info. * Advertisement -Special Events * Radio Comercials -Special Events * Cable -Production of Commercial and Airtime * Hire Musicians /Artists /Performance * Banners for Special Events * Santa Sunday -Purchase toys, * City Costs -Special Events Permits, SAPD costs, Code Enforcement, SAFD costs * Business License Fees * Newsletter -Printing, Distribution and Mailing costs * Administration & Operational Costs. * Promotional -Tree lighting of the Downtown. * Other Promtional items and programs. ~~g * Business Directory. * Advertisement of the Downtown in Popular Magazines * Marketing Materials * Conference Expenses /networking Seminars * Printing, coping costs, graphics and layouts. * Consultants and Contract reviews * Seminar /Courses * Other Marketing Methods and expenses. Fundraisers * Networking /Auctions -seminar cost * Catering, conference rooms, mucisicans * Advertisement, publicity expense * Printing Materials * Consultant & Administrative Costs * Other Fundraising Methods Exhibit C 25A-6 Downtown Santa Ana Business Council Budget for 2006/07 Starting balance Subscriptions: Chamber, newsletters, periodicals Paperwork filings: IRS, state, local (business license) Insurance: Director coverage + 4 major events Art Grant/patronage: 2 annual prizes based on criteria Contracted persons: legal, accounting, web Events Committee: 4 public events Marketing Committee: advertising, printing City & Outreach Committee: postage, website design & maintenance Exhibit D 25A-7 25A-8 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: PURCHASE AGREEMENTS FOR BRISTOL STREET CORRIDOR (PROJECT 06-1500) APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 151 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute agreements with: Hani Tabello for the purchase of the commercial property located at 313 S. Bristol in the amount of $295,000; Hani Tabello for the purchase of the commercial property located at 317-323 S. Bristol in the amount of $785,000; Rafael Elizalde for the purchase of the single-family residence located at 518 S. Bristol in the amount of $600,000; Antonio Matias for the purchase of the single-family residence located at 303 S. Bristol in the amount of $570,000. DISCUSSION On March 6, 2006 the City Council approved the cooperative agreement between the City and the Orange County Transportation Authority to fund Bristol Street improvements between McFadden Avenue and Pine Street. Improvements include widening of the street from four lanes to six, construction of landscaping in the parkways and the median islands, traffic improvements, drainage structures, sound walls, and other amenities as outlined in the Specific Plan. To accommodate the widening, the acquisition of entire properties as listed above are required (Exhibit 1). The purchase amounts are the appraised values prepared by an appraiser licensed in the State of California. 25B-1 Purchase Agreements September 18, 2006 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been determined to be adequately evaluated in the previously prepared Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Assessment EIR No. 89-01 approved by City Council in 1990. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are appropriated in the Select Street Construction Fund (account no. 59-553-6611). James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 25B-2 MATCHLINE SEE BOTTOM RK#IT RAYMAR ~ AVENUE G I MCFADDEN AVENUE -~ MATCWJNE SEE ABOVE LEFT EXHIBIT 1 SANT~ ~~ PURCHASE AGREEMENTS FOR cmr oouNC~ P~ ~ os BRISTOL STREET CORRIDOR ,,.~ „~,~, (PROJECT 06-1500) LEGEI~ Q SUBJECT PROPERTIES ® ACQUIRED PROPERTIES i 25B-3 WALNUT ST. 25B-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: EMPLOYEE GROUP INSURANCE RENEWALS ~~ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Authorize the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute agreements for employee group life and accidental death & dismemberment, medical and dental insurance. DISCUSSION The City's employee group benefit policies, contracts and agreements are renewed annually on January 1. Currently we provide life and accidental death & dismemberment coverage and long term disability insurance through AIG Life Insurance Company for full-time employees. AIG has agreed to renew our life and accidental death & dismemberment insurance agreement with no increase in cost for a one year period. We are currently in the second year of a two year rate guarantee for our long term disability insurance. Life Insurance Insurance Current Insurance Percent Change Coverage Insurance Rate Renewal Rate Life Insurance $0.130 per $1000 $0.130 per $1000 0.0% Accidental Death $0.03 per $1000 $0.03 per $1000 O.Oo & Dismemberment 25C-1 Employee Group Insurance Renewals September 18, 2006 Page 2 The City will continue to offer the existing three dental plans, which include one indemnity plan, Delta Dental and two prepaid plans Pacific Union Dental and Safeguard. There is no rate increase in Delta Dental. However, Pacific Union Dental rates will increase 8% and are guaranteed for a period of one year. Safeguard rates will increase approximately 90 and the rates are guaranteed for a period of three years. Dental Plans Type of Coverage Safeguard Dental Safeguard Dental Percent Previous Rate Rate 2007 Change Employee $23.22 $25.28 8.9% Employee Plus $39.79 $43.22 8.60 Family Type of Coverage Pacific Union Pacific Union Percent Change Previous Rate Rate 2007 Employee $23.35 $25.22 8.0~ Employee Plus $50.21 $54.23 8.0~ Family Type of Coverage Delta Delta Percent Change Previous Rate Rate 2007 Em to ee $48.39 $48.39 0.0~ Employee Plus $111.90 $111.90 0.0~ Famil 25C-2 Employee Group Insurance Renewals September 18, 2006 Page 3 Ca1PERS Health Program The Ca1PERS Health Program medical rates for Orange County will increase an average of 12.37%. This increase is caused by the escalating cost of prescriptions and expensive medical procedures while keeping the current low co-payment structure. Plan Employee Only Employee & 1 Dependent Employee & 2+ Dependents Blue Shield Access+ HMO $407.02 $814.04 $1058.25 Kaiser $360.60 $721.20 $ 937.56 PERSCare $731.40 $1462.80 $1901.64 PERSChoice $432.64 $865.28 $1124.86 PORAC(safety members) $439.00 $822.00 $1045.00 Retirees who pay the cost of coverage are not included in the annual cost estimates. In addition the Police Officers Association is not included in the medical and dental projections since they maintain their own insurance programs. FISCAL IMPACT The annual cost of each plan may vary depending on changes in the number of employees currently enrolled during the year. The projected annual costs, using current enrollment as of July 2006 are: AIG Life Insurance Company $ 265,358 Dental Carriers $ 660,796 Ca1PER5 Medical $ 7,976,933 REACH (EAP Provider) $ 41,803 Total Annual Cost $ 8,944,890 Funds in the amount of $8,944,890 are budgeted and available in the Personnel Services Employee Benefits account (account no. 81-177-6521). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: rique J. A Francisco Gutierrez Execut' e D're for Executive Director Personnel S vices Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 25C-3 25C-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: AMEND AGREEMENT WITH THE PHOENIX GROUP FOR AN AUTOMATED PARKING CITATION SYSTEM /` CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1 S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to amend the agreement with the Phoenix Group for an Automated Parking Citation System to increase compensation by an additional amount of $125,000 for the current agreement term and extend the term by an additional one-year period in an amount not to exceed $275,000 annually. DISCUSSION On February 22, 2005, Council authorized the Police Department to execute an agreement with the Phoenix Group to provide an Automated Parking Citation System for issuing and processing parking citations and the collection of parking penalties. The automated parking citation system streamlines and expedites the issuance and processing of parking citations. Phoenix Group also handles all refunds related to parking penalties. The additional funds of $125,000 are requested for the current agreement term due to increased enforcement of parking violations, creating additional processing activity. The proactive enforcement has greatly enhanced revenue, with an increase of over $735,000 compared to FY 04-05. Staff's evaluation satisfactorily and term, in an amount through the end of the processing, citations. has determined that the Phoenix Group has performed recommends renewing the agreement for another one-year not to exceed $275,000. The extension of the contract the 2007 calendar year will guarantee stability within tearing, and collection procedures for our City's 25D-1 Amend Agreement for Automated Parking Citation System September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the additional compensation for the current second year term and the first six months of the third year renewal are available in the Police Department Traffic Division Other Contractual Services Account (account no. 011-333-6291), Public Works - Roadway Cleaning Other Contractual Services Account (account no. 068-633-6291), and CDA - Parking Meter Fund Other Contractual Services Account (account no. 027-013-6291). Funds for the last six months of the amendment will be included in the FY 07-08 budget. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Paul M. Walters Chief of Police Police Department ~~~~~ ~~~ /Francisco Gutierrez ,,~/ ~v( Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency ~i~~; Stephen G. Haring Deputy City Manager for Development Services Community Development Agency 25D-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: AGREEMENT AMENDMENT FOR SALSA LEISURE CLASS INSTRUCTOR ~ ~~ ~~`,. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment to the agreement with Salomon Rivera for dance instruction, increasing the agreement amount by $15,000 and extending the term six months, for a total aggregate amount not to exceed $25,000. DISCUSSION The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency offers low-cost courses and activities to Santa Ana residents in the areas of music and dance, arts, nature and science, equestrian and aquatics, sports, and other special interests. The semi-annual Leisure Services Program brochure has been instrumental in increasing the number of students registering for many classes. As a result of this success, an additional beginning Salsa course has been added to accommodate community demand. Salomon Rivera conducts Salsa dance classes on Wednesday from 6:OOpm to 9:OOpm at the Southwest Senior Center. The Leisure Services Program is a revenue-generating program that uses registration fees to pay for instructors and supplies. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Recreation, Other Contractual Services account (account no. 11-275-6291). J Gerard Mouet Execut' e Director Parks, ecreation, and Community Services Agency APPROVED ~AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~~Francisco Gutierrez t~~a Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 25E-1 25E-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS FOR RELOCATION OF THE JOHNSON CHAPEL HISPANIC CENTER (PROJECT 1819) ~~ Education lsr CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 151 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO RECOMMENDED ACTION FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute: 1. An amendment to the relocation agreement with Johnson Chapel; and 2. An amendment to the agreement with Gates Development for an additional $90,344.00 for a total of $220,000 for the costs associated with relocation of the Hispanic Worship of the Johnson Chapel Church. DISCUSSION On May 1, 2006, the City Council approved agreements for the acquisition and relocation of the Church property located at 1306 W. Second Street and 204 N. Bristol Street as part of the Bristol Street Widening Project between Pine and Third Streets. The relocation agreement authorized the City to construct the improvements necessary at the former All Auto Parts building located at 124 S. Bristol in lieu of a relocation payment. The City Council also approved an agreement with Gates Development for tenant improvements at 124 S. Bristol. During construction, it was found that additional improvements are needed to satisfy Building Code requirements. As of this date approximately 50~ of work has been completed. To complete the renovation and meet the required deadline for demolition of the existing Hispanic Worship Center, a change order is needed. This relocation site will be used by the church while they construct a permanent facility at their site located at Bristol and Second Street. 25F-1 Amendments to Agreements for Johnson Chapel (Project 1819) September 18, 2006 Page 2 FNVIRONMTNTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been determined to be adequately evaluated in previously prepared Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Assessment EIR No. 89-01 approved by City Council in 1990. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the proposed acquisitions are available in the Transportation Systems Area Fund F (account no. 35-631-6631, project no. 1819). ames G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~~'rancisco Gutierrez ~,~~ Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 25F-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-11 AND VARIANCE NOS. 2006-03, 2006-04 AND 2006-05 TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE AND PARKING STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCT A STARBUCKS WITH DRIVE-THROUGH SERVICES AT 2303 SOUTH BRISTOL STREET - NEWMARK MERRILL, APPLICANT ~' --._.. CITY MANAGER APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15t Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive and file the staff report approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 as conditioned, Variance No. 2006-03 as conditioned, Variance No. 2006-04 as conditioned and Variance No. 2006-05 as conditioned. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION On August 28, 2006, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 as conditioned, Variance No. 2006-03 as conditioned, Variance No. 2006-04 as conditioned and Variance No. 2006-05 as conditioned by a vote of 7:0 to reduce landscape and parking standards and construct a Starbucks with drive-through services in the General Commercial (C-2) zoning district at 2303 South Bristol Street. The Planning Commission added project conditions that all driveway pavement treatments for the shopping center match the new decorative driveway entrance/exit pavement proposed for the new project construction and a separate condition that the applicant add additional trees and landscaping to the shopping center parking lot without reducing the number of parking spaces (Exhibit A). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Jay M. Trevino utive Director Planning & Building Agency BA:rb ba/reports2006/starbuckscup06-11va06-03thru06-OS.cc 31 A-1 REQUEST FOR Planning Commission Action PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: AUGUST 28, 2006 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - FILED BY NEWMARK MERRILL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-11 AND VARIANCE NOS. 2006-03, 2006-04 AND 2006-05 TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE AND PARKING STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCT A STARBUCKS WITH DRIVE- THROUGH SERVICES AT 2303 SOUTH BRISTOL STREET Prepared by Bill Apple PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Set Public Hearing For DENIED ^ Applicant's Request ^ Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO Executive Director Planning Ma ger RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 as conditioned. 2. Adopt a resolution approving Variance No. 2006-03 as conditioned. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Variance No. 2006-04 as conditioned. 4. Adopt a resolution approving Variance No. 2006-05 as conditioned. DISCUSSION Request of Applicant NewMark Merrill Companies is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to build a Starbucks drive-through restaurant and variances to deviate from the City's landscape and parking standards. Property Description The project site is within the 7.61 acre Bristol Warner Village shopping center on the southeast corner of Bristol Street and Warner Avenue. The center has five existing buildings with approximately 16 commercial tenants occupying a total of 75,114 square feet. The property has a zoning designation of General Commercial (C-2) and a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC) The project site is one parcel with parking for approximately 472 vehicles. EXHIBIT A 31 A-2 Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 Variance Nos. 2006-03 thru 2006-05 August 28, 2006 Page 2 Surrounding land uses include retail and residential uses across Warner Avenue to the north; retail and commercial uses to the south; medical offices and residential property to the east; and retail uses across Bristol Street to the west (Exhibits 1 and 2). Project Description The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,013 square foot Starbucks coffee shop with a drive-through lane and attached 1,773 square foot retail space. As a requirement of the project, a dedication of 12 to 18 feet has been provided along the frontage of the new building along Bristol Street and Warner Avenue. This dedicated area will be landscaped until future street improvements are made. The applicant has provided the required 15-foot landscape setback along Warner Avenue and the frontage of the new building along Bristol Street. Between five feet and eight feet of new landscaping is being provided along the remainder of the Bristol Street frontage. Architecture for the project incorporates several tower elements, a metal roof canopy, aluminum store front windows and a combination of stucco and stone veneer. Decorative pavement has been provided to accent project walkways, outdoor seating areas and across project drive entrances on the Starbucks site (Exhibit 3). A total of 52 new trees will be added to the site as a result of this project. Tree sizes have been upgraded from 24-inch box trees to 36-inch box trees with the majority of these trees located at the corner of Bristol Street and Warner Avenue and along the street frontage of the shopping center. The tree palette includes 31 Australian Flame Trees, three Canary Island Date Palms, nine Canary Island Pine Trees and nine Aristrocrat Pears. Analysis of the Issues The Bristol Warner Village shopping center is considered legal non- conforming because the site does not comply with the City's current development standards. Per City code, when a new building is added to a non-conforming site, the entire property, in this case the 7.61 acre shopping center, is required to be brought into conformance with City development standards. 31 A-3 Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 Variance Nos. 2006-03 thru 2006-05 August 28, 2006 Page 3 All new construction meets City codes; however, discretionary actions are required for a reduction in landscaping along Bristol Street, landscape planters within the shopping center, for a reduction in parking and to operate a drive-through restaurant in the General Commercial (C-2) zoning district. Each discretionary action needed for the project to move forward is discussed below. Conditional Use Permit The shopping center is located in the General Commercial (C-2) zoning district which requires a conditional use permit for eating establishments with drive-through window service. The drive-through lane is designed to City standards with a stacking distance of 80 feet provided from the pick-up window to the order board and an additional 80 feet of stacking provided from the order point to the end of the drive- through lane. The Starbucks building and surrounding area meet City codes pertaining to landscaping, parking and setbacks. The drive- through lane will be hidden by a landscaped berm and hedge to help screen vehicles using the drive-through lane and to minimize glare from vehicle headlights during evening hours. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the conditional use permit necessary to operate an eating establishment with drive-through window service. Varianra~ Reduction in landscaped setbacks along Bristol Street Fifteen feet of landscaping is required along Bristol Street and Warner Avenue. The applicant has provided the necessary 15-foot landscaped setback along Warner Avenue and along the street frontage occupied by the new building on Bristol Street. Along the remainder of Bristol Street to the south of the proposed building, between five and eight feet of new landscaping is provided, which includes a two-foot vehicle overhang into this landscape area. To mitigate the reduced landscape setback, 18 new 36-inch box trees are being added to the new landscaping provided at the shopping center along the Bristol Street frontage. 31 A-4 Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 Variance Nos. 2006-03 thru 2006-05 August 28, 2006 Page 4 Although there is physically enough room to provide the required 15 feet of landscaping along Bristol Street, doing so would eliminate approximately 19 parking spaces. This is problematic because the shopping center is currently under-parked per City parking standards. To prevent further loss of parking, it is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the proposed landscape reduction along Bristol Street. Reduction in landscape planters within the parking area The City's commercial standards require one 8~-foot wide by 18-foot long landscape planter for every 10 parking spaces provided. The purpose of this requirement is to distribute landscaping throughout the parking lot, provide shade and enhance the visual appearance of the City's commercial districts. There are 472 parking spaces within the center which requires 47 landscape planters. The applicant has focused landscape improvements to the corner of Bristol Street and Warner Avenue where the new building will be constructed and along project street frontages. Five landscape planters have been provided adjacent to the new Starbucks building in addition to five tree well cut outs. Tree sizes have been upgraded throughout the center from 24-inch box trees to 36-inch box trees. A total of 52 new 36-inch box trees have been provided as the result of the new building being added to the site. The addition of 8~ feet wide by 18-foot long landscape planters to the remainder of the site would result in a loss of approximately 42 parking spaces. To avoid a further loss of parking, staff has agreed to allow the applicant to focus landscape improvements to areas adjacent to the new Starbucks building and along project street frontages. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance for a reduction in the number of landscape planters provided for the center. Reduction of Parking The addition of the new building on the site triggers the City's non- conforming ordinance which requires the overall site to comply with City parking standards. The shopping center consists of 16 commercial tenants occupying 75,114 square feet. Based upon the uses and square footage of the tenant spaces, 486 parking spaces are required while 472 parking spaces have been provided. 31 A-5 Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 Variance Nos. 2006-03 thru 2006-05 August 28, 2006 Page 5 The applicant has provided parking to code for the new Starbucks/retail building. Thirty new parking spaces have been added to the site, while 29 parking spaces are required for the 3,788 square foot food/retail building. In order to analyze whether or not the existing parking lot would be adequate enough to support the proposed expansion, a shared parking analysis was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., a traffic engineering firm, for the project. The study was completed using the Urban Land Institute (ULI) shared parking methodology and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) parking demand (Exhibit 4). The shared parking analysis for the Bristol Warner Village shopping center was intended to provide an analysis of the parking demand based upon the different activity patterns and uses within the center. It reviewed the City's parking requirements for restaurants and retail uses and proposed an alternative demand based upon other parking generation factors. According to the Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Shared Parking Publication, shared parking is defined as parking spaces that can be used to serve two or more individual land uses without conflict or encroachment. Land uses within the shopping center were found to be compatible with one another with users often shopping at more than one business per trip. For example, customers eating at one of the restaurants on site might also shop at a retail store located within the shopping center, thereby reducing the parking demand required for individual uses. The study concluded that sufficient parking was provided to meet the peak and future parking demands of the shopping center. The number of on-site parking spaces provided is 472, while the maximum number of parking spaces expected to be occupied is 442 on December weekdays and 380 on December weekends. Based upon the shared parking concept, a total of 29 parking spaces (6.2 percent of the total lot) were projected to be unoccupied with maximum demand based on all uses. The study concluded that sufficient on-site parking will be available to serve the existing land uses and the proposed Starbucks restaurant. Staff therefore recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed 14 space parking variance. Based upon the above analysis and findings, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the conditional use permit and variances required for the project. 31 A-6 Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 Variance Nos. 2006-03 thru 2006-05 August 28, 2006 Page 6 CEQA Compliance This project was reviewed in accordance with the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15303. This Class 3 exemption allows the construction of a store, motel, office, restaurant or similar structure in urban areas not exceeding 10,000 square feet of floor area on sites zoned for such use, if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances, where all public services and facilities are available and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2006-107 will be filed for this project. Bill Apple Associate Planner BA:jm ba/reports2006/cup06-11va06-03thru06-OS.StarbucksNewmarkMerrill.pc Vince Fregoso, AICP Senior Planner 31 A-7 D Rp 3 PRD ~ R1 ~ Ri ~ Ri 0 R1 ~UDkERr~sr. R' Ri R1 R7-PRD ~ R1 Ri sP R1 y R1 R, AL ST R1 R1 R1 R7 „R2 „s~ R7 Ri R1 .AN -- STMIDREW R. I ~ R1 R1 R1 R1 sP a • R Riy c+ A T NR Ri + DARLT fl R1 R1 R1 c, R1 Ri sv ~ R R1 Rt Rt ~ Ri R1 R1 __ 7 R, R, R1 R1 R1 sP a ~ R2 HARVARD sT. , ~ R " R1 ~r I Ri R R1 R1 R1 R1 sP NR R1 m R1 R1 I CAMD N P Ri R1 ST PLANE R1 ~ R, 3 NN PL Ri R R3 ~ - .Af1NE PL. z ST GERTRIAE PL. 35 ~ ~ ~ R1 R1 R1 sP I ~ Rz -- sT. R R1 0 R1 R1 R1 R1 ~ LE - AHU PL R1 R3 R1 R1 R1 ~ R1 ~ R1 R1 w C2 sr R1- R1 R1 ~ R1 R1 ¢ MA ~ a R1 330 ~ R1 wY SDQ p~.zg ~ R1 R1 R1 - R1 0 R1 R1 Rl R, C2 ~ ~ T'~ I R - - WARNER AV. N LET V - - R, T ~ Q io. ~ ~ n n n R, R' R' ~ ~~ I PROJECT SITE R1 5T R1 R1 C2 C2 I M1 HALL AV = 3~," X383.3. ~, R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R, H L AV R, R, R1 Ri HALL AV \C4 RZ_PRD CENTRAL AV. REWER ~" R1 C2 s I, -, 3 ~ ~' R1 cE v - - I~ ; M1 ,~ R1 '° ~ R, J ~ Mt 0 u R1 ~ C2 R9 a R R3 R+ R1 R1 R1 3 R1 R1 .R+3 C4 m ~ R1 3 R1 " R1 ~ R O ~ HEMLOCK WAY SEGERSTROM AV DYEq H l KWY Ri NO q1 Rt Rl i Ri } °iae 125- R, Rl R1 L - I ~ C2 Mi Ii R1 ; R1 ~ R1 - I ~ C1 ~~\~\R1 L~_ 1 ~ ~^ C2 E°P 0 ~<~~ ___ _ P ~ ~\ SEGERS7ROM AV. - ~ „a GP lip ~~~''~~~ ~ R1-PRD R1 ~ s C7 s II (I' ~% \ CARRIA ~ ICI C1 R1 Y N II _ _ II Rt ~;\ R1 R7- ~' R7-PRD m Ri Ri P LL ~ R1 - I PRO~8 ~ ~1 f'~l pNA Z 5 ~° ~ R, R4 ~PNS~~ ^ n Ri ~ i'_ _ _I~i \I I_ _ _ At GENERAL AGRICULTURAL CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL R1 31NGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE •B PARKING MODIFICATION GC GOVERNMENT CENTER R2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE C-SM COMMERCIAL SOUTH MAIN Mt LIGHT INDUSTRIAL R3 MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE C1 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL M2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL R4 SUBURBAN APARTMENTS Ct-MD COMM. COMMERCIAL-MUSEUM DISTRICT MO MILITARY OPERATIONS RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE C2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL 0 OPEN SPACE SD SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT C3 CENTRAL BUSINESS P PROFESSIONAL SP SPECIFIC PLAN C&A CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST VILLAGE PCD PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CS ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL CUP 06-11 / VA 06-3, 4 & 5 ~ STARBUCKS DRIVE-THROUGH ~ - - = S00 FEET •••--• 2303 SOUTH BRISTOL STREET 1" = 1000 FEET P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y VICINITY MAP 3~i~B~T , COM. ~ FLORIST O U WARNER VACANT LOT W W o ~ H O (n 2 O FABRIC STORE U CUSTOME STORE SFR vi vi W ¢ DENTIST SFA Q j ~ Q N LIQUOR TIRE J STORE STORE Z W W W SFR SFR Q ? ? Q ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED / STARBUCKS AVENUE DENTAL MEDICAL IMMIGRATION OFFICE CONVALESCENT HEALTH CARE CENTER VACANT LOT CAR WASH FURNITURE STORE y PIZZA SHOP W DENTIST J RESTAURANTS 0 ~ SHOE STORE N m CIRCUIT CITY E FAMILY R SIDE TIAL T-SHIRT STORE -~ EL POLLO MEDICAL SO. CA. EDISON LOCO OFFICES UTILITIES ti O ti z U CUP 06-11 / VA 06-3, 4 & 5 ~ STARBUCKS DRIVE-THROUGH ~, 2303 SOUTH BRISTOL STREET P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT 2 31 A-9 W Q D O O SFR Q ~ ~ ~ Q_ ~ ~ ~ ~' 0 3 w 3 ~. ~ ~ y RE > ~,0 ~ ~ w ~ o O C //~~ ~ € Z ~ o U ~ 8 ~ ~ o o ~ •Ys . a ~ w C E 3'~ ~ 3~ E u ~ w r ~ ~ . • < ~gm~ ~ ~ ° ° ~ ~/ ~ ~; ~ ~ w ° _ o ~_ ~ ~ a o s./7 w ,. O ~ l/7 N N ~ ~N ~ ~ r ~ £ a ~ w ~~ ~ ~2 r~ ~ J f E N H a u ~ O OO I m - i f 4 Z ~ Z Z F ~ ~ ale `5 F 4I ~ v ~ ~ o ~n W J J H N I 1 1 W' I..L C/) J O Q C/~ M~ O W Q LL Z Q Q U ~..L~ Q Z Z t!~ W ~~ SO O e k ~ a ~ °~ W Ti _ v X Z ~ j °N ~ ~ Y ~ 'M O W ~~ Y~ _ ~ ~ y' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CI UI tll yy ~ ~ y ~ d S 'W`$g Og < <~ _k i g 4 4 0~&~ °~ .~ 4 ~. o~£mS i6°a~ ~Ym~d ~~^mF u~.~Py N ~ ~~~ Aga o ~~o § `-~ o ~ ~ o E ~ pp' V Urc ~~ $°~ ~VUm~ y~umF FLV m~ W ~ zmu~~3m° ~ra<° omf~° °.°`~m° ~M1Za° O i m w VC Z ~I LLZ_ 3E irc S~ oVc O O QQ Vw ~Q ~Z ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~7 ~~ veil t. CGbC.FF C~ F„~FFC FCC kC ^O, rc Z "u, "~ ~ ~ Gi'Ji "ui Yn 'Ji b "u. "N tlt b "N q "~ 9i "/~ U oy ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~8~ ~ 8~8 ~~ ~a ~ -,-n --~r~ ~ n-, -- u~'< ~ =o~ ~ ~ ~ 8 a o ~y~z~'Z~a~g ~ ~ ~ g ~` ~ - ~ N ~~Y ~~ i~w~Src Z~ Z ~ v ~ YI C~` a a "~ Y 7 pp Q5 i°i~R 5=0 9 L-~ F.o 35~~ ~~~~F °~ m m~ Wp~"~~YO ~YO° °' ~~~~€W~o ~S~€~Y ~~ €~z ~pw~~~ ~ €~ : ~3~~C3 E g n ~ y ~< ~ ~ GZ~"'~O xo~ ~ ~ozLLW 3N g 44 ~ S ~ _ Y ~ ~ ~~ ~ Y ~ o _ ~ ~ ~~~ ono o~~ ~~ ~o ~ ~ € 4s~a~9 ~~ ~ ~ $ ~~ 3 ~ _ a _ ~ ozw€~ ~~ ~`"€~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ gW~<"~ °~<o~ ~ ~ qq ~~ a ~~~~ e 'SS ~ ~ ~ 4 p~W~~oT~b '' ioo ~~gt~~gg '3 ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ w~ z ~o _~ o~ ~o ~°< 7~ W~ ~o z So a ~ xo &'~ Sm ~O m~ mZ ~HIBIT S- age 1 of 6 n F Z V_ W~ o~o y~ : ~ o ~ ~~a~ €~ ~~~ s~€o~u~ ~~ ~~ ~~W~W ~~ ~~~ ~_ $W~~m~ °~~ ~Qs~~~~ ~~m ~ ~~ ~~a~~ ~ ~ ~Z 40 p< ~~ ~~4C O~'~ ~~~ ~~0~~~3 ~~~g $g y~=~~~~ 4oi~io ~~~ og y33z s~3~ ~€ ~~~V;~; ~F~~~~ ~5~~ youy~-oq~ s~~~ oo ~QUZg~~ ~oo~Q$ ~ G ~ S~QC '~~ ~~ ~~m~3~: ~Wo~ z '03?~o~w~~~`o~ ~G~~ ooF o4~x i~~~ oiog~~ go ~ [W9 WF ~~e ~€€ ~' ~~~~o~o~ ~y~= o ~u$m ~3i°uoW3S ~~oo ~~' rx-~!<~~ ~~ ~o~~~= ~ > ~ i u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o Q ~ E n ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ u A C C n d„ F ry F C 3 3 C z 3 3 ~ ~ gg Y ~ ~ F ~ 4Y~ i ~ ~~ ~ o ~ z ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ q ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~° ~ o c _ ;i I Z 1e F ~ Z Z ~ Z < i g ~ ~ U ~ w ~ ~ Z Y ~ Y G ~ 7 ~ 7 C Y ~~55 ~? •• ~ ~~ o ~ o . o 0 6 ~~ m 0 Z Z O ~ ~~ i i~ i 6 1~ ~~ q K' ~ Y w ~ ~ T ~ ~ i! ~ ~ ~ ! w ~ i ~ ~ ~~ I o--~. b ~ ~° ~ _~~ m m ~ ~ k G F j o ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~/ N m ~ o ~ w w.~ i W' t Z Z i u E~ ^ j °1 `a~ ~ N ~ 3 ~ 3 ~ ~ _ i ~ 0 O ~ }~ ~/~ C O a m m 8 °~;°~ ° p win z ~~ o OU ' a W Z ~w ~ G ~.u i, ~ _ IJ.J w" ~Z ! ~ ~ w• ~Ys W t<98° { f O ~ ~ z f a t N W o Y~< m ~g~ ; ~ ~ o~Q o o + i sI o ~ v~ V _ ~ ; '~, P ~ ~N O w vii ~ I ~ ~ a s s i m ~~ ~ ~ w ~ N a - I o ~ O O ~ O Z m f { n~£kSE Z~ o N O ff o e O d~ i~ T Z Z z ~. Z ~ ~'! ~ ~ ~ = p 2 ~ ~ ,py ~ r O ~~~ ~ ~ J~ ~ w ~ 2 ~ s~~ a ~ oa ~ gg ~ ~i ~` 2 t Z ~ ~ ~ yy ~ Q ~ ~ ~ N o J~ n 3 $ ~ ~ ~ g ^® ~° ~ O 0 0000 s r.. ' i i n x ~- - it '. ", ` ~rnN Kd N~ V ~ i`Q ~ 1F i I -~. i t~mo~°N m ma m ! ~ I > - 3 '~ ~ ~ I N fs. ~jl .I ~ ~ ~ I o I 0 I 4 Ca- , i ~~~~ t , ___ ° I ~l ~~" I ! ~ I ..°,,. y.,,. » ,- , , ~ I .!-. .... I I -..'w w~ I u ~~ _-i ~4 ~ 4dsV ~ ~ ~~ -. -. T ~ ° ~ 6 _ 46 ° ~ ~° 1S d9 ° a.l-~sl, I I Iq~__ -~ -~~ - m.,a` ~\ n e iy r ~ w i ~ 9 ~ I i N Sii c I I ~ ~~. I /~ e .rw 1T 1T` _ I Y a. ° rw ~ I 1 ',~. ~ I ~ I 1 1T-. g11N e.a '. ' ~ I a m'~ I ! ~ \ I I u g1~c > n ~ I a F I I w °~I ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ f .I~~ .I .~ I ~11~1~ N ~i ///A T® T~ - ..... ` ~ ° a ~ ~_ -I I '., - .. ...... .. I I I ~ ~ _. :~ . . ;; ~, yd y5 d~ E~ ~ 55 M Cp p~~Z ~ E LL~3 d ~~ ~ 5 E~ ~ E 6~aL ]~ 9 d R ~~~ 3~ ~ ~[ }~ ~~~ :~ _~ Cp ~a ~ a~ _ 3~ h~ s I ° I I ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ '' I ' !i t tti a.~ ~~ ~ I ~., ~~ 6 a ~ c C ~ ~ ° G ~ o ~ i s ' ' QQ ` u ~ J o Z ^ ° ~ ? W ~ - ~ J s z 3 §kt~ ~ ~ ~ . w ~ /i/~~~~~ pEp~ j ~' }~ •YW U~a°8 w ~ N O ~ ~ w ~ Z r~ ~~ ~ ~ w C-+ -~3 ~ Z ~ O V O ~ ~ j ~d w G r~ o ~ u O Z ~ C< 8 K ~ r ~ 3 W ~ o _ ~~ ~ £ o N ~ v, o ~ ~ O W a ~ ° ~ Ez U O gg ~ O ~ p T 3 I ~ N ~ ~ ~ a ~ E m V d :E N O W rn. }£ Z ~ O Z m 3 ~- 4 O ~ z 4 e y p a .n ~ to og ' o ~ o ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ` d mz i w ~''~, C~ ~~d ^~ ~ o ~~ a m ~ a~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y 4 Iw ~ p < ~ ~ b r : d ,N_ Z = ~di a ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ff ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~'' ~ a ~ ~ w p 4 4 ' w g <~i ~ a ~ ~ s ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~rcai~ ~' x ~ 3 b ' : ~ ~ ~ . '. g w s d 4 o d~ 4 < ~ 4 Y I < x~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y % ~ y ~3~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ F. ~ ~ ~"m4 ~ E ^N E~~OG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O 00 00 0000000 0000 ~~ ~,~ ~~ i ~a i ~ I} I W i ~ I ~ Z ~ W ~1 I Q `.~ N W f ~ ~~ i !I ~~ zZ .~~~. ~o ~`~ ~Q C ' '~- ~ ~H a __~ Q ~ -- .~ 9 ~ ~ ~' p ~f~ ~ ry~. E ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~- - .o-« _ o- ~ .. 4 ~ i Y •~ $ i x ~ ~ __ $v ~ r ~ 1 N ~ ~ _ ~ ..... ~ ~ __ ._ ~ _ i ~'-`R / ' i ~ o e >aimb ~w~ - I' lj '. ~ ~ ~ ` - ..~. ------ r,~.~ ~ F - J. y - D 4 ---------- .«. .o-.. .«o ~` ~ IVVJ ~`JJ ~ r.a ~ .-.. .r,n ~ i ? O ~ Y .o-,~i .a-.w i ' ~ r}.e 11 m ~8 W ~6 o-~i .o-.a I 9 iTl I ~~ 8 o m c_~° ~ '^ ~O S ~ i - ~ , - ; O "'= O ~ ~ p ~ +i ~, q ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ', ,~ ~~~ r _ ~ _ ~ti~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~, ~< -~ - ~ ~- - . , , ~ M , t 4{ f ~~ ~~ a.~siav~~ r f~. ~ ~ O Z i a a ~~ =I w ~ ~ ~ ~=` ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.} /~~ __ pFp~ _~ ~ ~ 3 3 3 ~Y Yio€ ~ O N U e g g ¢~ ~ G ,.i~c iF ~ Q W O 3 ~n ~n W€~y j~ a ~£ E m O V m O Z ~ m 4. e _=Hod Y 3Z O N LL LL OC F .€ O a .n p Z I i I I ( i I - - ~ I ~ i I ~ 1 I ~~ I I ~ I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~~ ~~ i ~ I I i ~ I o "~~ i I i I i i ii ~ q 4~P I II I I ~ I I I i I ~ i \ ii ~ i i ~ ~~ I ~ ~ / ~ ~.~ ,o-.n .r-.a a as I LL3 ~ j i I i _ 2 3~ S Y ~ I I ~~ i 4 _ I W II i i I _ ___ __-_ - __r____ __ ______ __T __ J I ~ ~ I I ' r- -- --- -- -- ---------- -- ---- a -- ------ -- ------ i I '~ I ~ I ~ m t i e - - -- ------- h - ~ ° -i- i i - ' I a i i~ ~~ n ~ ~ ~ LLE i I ~ ~ ? ~,; ~ 1 1 i~ ~, Y L= ____ ~~ __J Z ~ ~ 1 - ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ m h ~ i ~ ~ ~ i I ~ ~ i i G9~ ~^ v'`5 i i /,~ i i ~ ii i ~ 7, , _ d ~ I ' ~ M / a ~ ' ~~ d i~ b l i I i i § i I I ~A ~ 6 ~ - . ~ ____-- ---- ~ i /ii . i `~ i f l ~ i I ~ ` ~ ___________ ~ I ~ ~ I I . +y % Y i ~ ~ i i ~ i +` ii ~ 4_ I I i I ~I ~ ~~i __n _~ o 1~~~ .v s.m .o-.r .o-.. .o-.. ..-.a - .o-.c .r.. ..,. . ~ 1\ ~ ~ a ~ r,,`` i______________ _~ r,,___________________,~ r _ -~ __~ _-- 0 ~ +O+-~ 00 o ~ ' ------- '~ ------- ----- -a o - - ----------------------- - - 13315 14tS1~8 ------- ---- ---- o - ~ 5 ~ -- - ---- ---- --------- - o o o a ~ ~ - ~ 5 ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~5~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 ~ 8 ge0 ~ ~ I I I ~ N ~~~~ 6 __ ~ m ~ ' G~~ ALL.} ~~I~R~ pEE~y ~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~~~$ z= Q ~ •YW U~aa~ ~_ c N .o u w w~ i ~ F- ~ C-+ _~~ ~ Z OV <~<w~ ~~ w O ~~ t<xs ~ `o ~ E 3 x w J Y~c ~~~ ~ ¢ ~ m ° ~ .LLB V - ~~ ppE I o w o° o =o~ ~ ~ o ;~ O i ~ 3a ° Z i d Z i CO i~ _~~~WFrv o~ ~ ~x E i i- o -. ., o ~ ~~ _ ~w ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 $ k~ y~ 9 9 8 ~ ~- ~ ~ <oo € s ~ ~^ ~~ ~~ ~, a ~< ~< a I ~ f ~ m ~ o p ~~~~ &~~e ~~~2 ~~: ~~ s~ tg ~3~ ~c~ r~~ ~~~tl ;~~ _~~ ~ az ~~a ~~ ~. sNidv~sanv~ (NI ~~ • i ~ Y 6 Y Y S ~ 4 ~ ~ R° ~~~ Ys ! Y Ys Yx Y,- Y Y Y_ Y;~ Y Y`- Y,_ Y Y Y Yq g Y; Y:- Y- i ~°.~ ~ 666 Y $ y I ~ _ ~ ~ i i i W~~ ~ Q 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C°J 0 ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 0 ~ i y. _ t ~ I I i ' _ - - ' =__ ; ; D ~ ~ ' 4 4 Y sl ICI ~ / ~ '~ `~' I' -. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~I (r(~ ~ ~ L ~ y ___ I I J ~ C ___ I ~ I a I I ~ I I I I 1 I I ~ I I AbMJIIVM (N) vrrS~,'F.~MI ~6 ~6 i--- 76 ~t ~ ~ ~ I Q `~' I~ ~~ . ~ ,~ F ,, ~~' ~~ O ~ ~; ,- f E ~~r o~ ,,~~ i i a i~ ~~ ~~¢ ~~ ~_ 7 ~o ~- ~ o, 0 ~~ ~_- s ~w >~ ~OQ E~m d D P ~nI ~ o ~ O d o V I ~~ ~k ~~ Z ~~ ~~ 7 3 9~ ?'~ p2 u ~6 ~6 °~6 X16 6 Z6 y 7~ ~~ ~~ ~ ' III T 1~ 0 ~ _ ~ q -- ~ ~ . 0~--~ Q- ~~,--'~-r= ~~ -~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ Z a I i - O_ ~ CC Ig r"k ~a 992 ~~ r ~ 7 Y I~ge 5 of 6 S' I ____I __ 1 I ~~ \~ii Z \ Q ~~ ~ c woos i unlan Mf?i! _ Z ~° ~~ w a= ~a ~m d 0 Z O ~ `{~; ILL ~ i 4 Z'~'Y `x4 .Q e 7 ~N g p ~ .- ~ .ooz~~~ ~ ^-° E e ~ v E o~~ W u z's~~l~ ~~r ~S~R U~~e`3 ~ ~ `n `v O ~ ~ 3 3 z zQx~~lw Q ~ C _ ~ w ~ o ~ ~ C~$.s=~ =~i ~ ~~.~ b Z p V E ~ TTs ~~$~t 3 0~ c ~geS=*~ ra~ ~~ ~~ - O w o N ~ C£~Qg`~b ~ r ~ z E F a Z uS d m _ F`L'oa£yY m0 ~ o _ ¢ ~ 2b3~~F°5 e ~ '~ ~ € ~ 6 ~ $ S s ~ g ~ ~ g ~ ~, ~ ~ 4, ~ ~ ~ ~ g II ~ b ~ ; ~$ ~ t ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ J o ~ ' ~, g fr~~~~ s~ ~~~ i fr V o~ I z ? s ~ I cv e Tg~ s~ E b ~~ ~ €' E b Z 4 ~ H U ~ 3 b m~z O~ ~ S b yy "+ g5 °ee££R~~g ~ ~ ~ ~ S~gP I~ " ~ 4 S 3 ~ S 3~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~6 ~~ w < g a _ '~ ~ ~ 9 ~a~~~ a ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ I~g a 0 s c~ f~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ a z ~ ~F~~ ~~ ~ ~~s~LL f'~~~ 3 i~ BRISTOUWARNER SHOPPING CENTER SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS (Revised 04/06/06) City of Santa Ana, California ~~ ~. ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~..~. 1-S+fdtY 5T18;C0 w LULDMS YId AUN M~It ~® G! /.~ /IIrfI1E 10Id t~~'~~ engineering group, inc. ~ m engineering ~ group, inc. transportation planning -traffic engineering acoustical engineering parking studies April 6, 2006 Mr. Sandy Sigal NEWMARK MERRILL COMPANIES 5850 Canoga Avenue, Suite 650 Woodland Hills, CA 91356 Subject: Bristol/Warner Shopping Center Shared Parking Analysis (Revised) Dear Mr. Sigal: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to provide this shared parking analysis for the Bristol/Warner Shopping Center. The site is located at the southeast corner of Bristol Street and Warner Avenue in the City of Santa Ana. The project is currently fully developed; however, the existing project is an existing non-conforming use that does not meet the City of Santa Ana parking code requirements. Additionally, you would like to evaluate the shared parking for the site assuming the existing future store is a standard retail use. The project does not provide the amount of parking based upon the City of Santa Ana Parking Code when all of the individual land uses are accounted for. Therefore, the City wants to be sure that the parking demand for the project is adequately accommodated by the available parking with the full occupancy of the site based upon desired uses anticipated by Newmark Merrill Companies. This includes assuming that an existing furniture store would become a retail use. A ULI (Urban Land Institute) shared parking analysis has been performed to determine if the parking of individual uses does not occur simultaneously, and therefore, does not create an overflow parking situation. The parking within the overall complex is shared in common; therefore, there can be a sharing of parking throughout the development. The shared parking analysis concludes that the on-site parking that is currently available can accommodate the amount of parking required for the project. The proposed mix of land uses lends itself to the shared parking concept where individual uses peak during different times of the day. This includes retail, restaurant, bar and services uses. Both weekday and weekend parking demands have been evaluated, in addition to the monthly/hourly variations of parking demand. It is anticipated that the retail, restaurant, and services uses will share a significant portion of the parking with each other. The land uses within the Bristol/V1/arner Shopping Center project are complimentary (i.e., retail and restaurant uses), and will help to minimize overall parking demand. This combination of complimentary uses is considered amulti-use development. 3991 macarthur boulevard, suite 310 newport beach, California 92660 tel 949.474.0809 fax 949.474.0902 3 ~ ~a2~ ~ http://www.rkengineer.com Mr. Sandy Sigal NEWMARK MERRILL COMPANIES April 6, 2006 Page 2 The results of this study indicate that the proposed parking to be provided at the site will be sufficient to meet the peak parking demand for the proposed mix of land uses included within the site. A series of recommendations are included within this parking study for your consideration. If you have any questions regarding this study, or need further review, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 474-0809. Sincerely; Qa0FES5/pN RK ENGINEERING GR ~~ ~~~RT Kgyy F2~/ ~ ~ fi `- ( / No. 0555 Robert Kahn, P.E. EXP. 12/31 /07 ~ ~ Principal ~T,~TTh'AFF~e'~~~Q' F 0 ~ t~FO 1 CA Attachments RK: AG: rdlRK4235 lN: 1737-05-05 1 Allison Goedecke, M.B.A. Senior Transportation Planner 31~a218 BRISTOUWARNER SHOPPING CENTER SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS (REVISED) City of Santa Ana, California Prepared for: NEWMARK MERRILL COMPANIES 5850 Canoga Avenue, Suite 650 Woodland Hills, CA 91356 Prepared by: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 20201 S.W. Birch Street, Suite 250 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Robert Kahn, P.E. Allison Goedecke, M.B.A. Q~OFESSIpNq~ ~~~~ ~~gERT Kgy2 ~~~. ~' ~, W °C No. 0555 EXP. 12/31 /07 i~ sT~TF OF CAS\FO~~\P April 6, 2006 RK: AG: rdlRK4235 JN: 1737-05-05 31~~19 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Parking Analysis ................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Parking Analysis 2-1 2.2 Shared Parking Analysis 2-2 2.3 Shared Parking Results 2-3 3.0 Overflow Parking ................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 Findings ............................................................................................... 4-1 5.0 Recommendations ............................................................................... 5-1 6.0 Conclusions .......................................................................................... 6-1 31 ~~~0 List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map ........................................................................................................... A Site Plan ................................................................................................................... B Weekday Hourly Parking Demands ........................................................................... C Weekend Hourly Parking Demand ............................................................................ D Tables Existing Land Uses .................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Land Uses .................................................................................................. 2 Proposed Project Parking Requirements Per City Code ............................................... 3 Monthly Demand Variation as Percentage of Peak Month ......................................... 4 Bristol/VVarner Shopping Center Santa Ana Monthly Peak Parking Demand ............... 5 Appendices City of Santa Ana Parking Code ................................................................................ A Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking Methodology ........................................... B Shared Parking Printouts .......................................................................................... C 31 ~~~ 1 ( 1.0 Introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to provide this shared parking analysis for the Bristol/Warner Shopping Center in the City of Santa Ana. The development is located at the southeast corner of Bristol Street and Warner Avenue, as shown on Exhibit A. The purpose of this study is to determine existing peak parking demand and develop a shared parking study for the project. The parking within the overall complex is shared in common; therefore, there can be a sharing of parking throughout the development. The site will include 78,900 square feet of retail, restaurant, bar, and. services land uses. The existing land uses and sizes are summarized on Table 1. The proposed land uses and sizes for the project are summarized on Table 2. The two new buildings are included as vacant space in the table listing existing land uses. Some tenants may change in the future as shown in Table 2. The site is proposed with 471 parking spaces. The site plan for the project is shown on Exhibit B. The site has been fully developed with the exception of the two new vacant buildings. The project currently contains retail, restaurant, bar and services uses. The project does not provide sufficient on-site parking based upon the City of Santa Ana Parking Code when all of the individual land uses are accounted for. Therefore, the City wants to be sure that the parking demand for the project is adequately accommodated by the available parking. As a result of this, a shared parking analysis has been performed to determine if .the parking of individual uses does not occur simultaneously, and therefore, does not create an overflow parking situation. 1-1 31 ~~~2 ~_ i 2.0 Parkinc~Analysis 2.1 Parking Analysis The City of Santa Ana Parking Code is included in Appendix A. According to the City Parking Code, the Bristol/V1/arner Shopping Center would need to provide a total of 495 parking spaces for the proposed. uses, including the existing furniture store as a standard retail use. Table 3 shows the City parking requirements per land use within the site. However, because of the mixed-use nature of Bristol/VVarner Shopping Center, a ULI shared parking analysis has been completed to determine the appropriate amount of parking needed for the project. The developer plans to seek relief from parking standards based on the differences in peak usage hours for the individual (complimentary) uses, which will reduce the demand for parking spaces. There are 471 proposed parking spaces at the Bristol/V1/arner Shopping Center. However, based upon the shared parking concept, there will be sufficient parking spaces available for parking to meet the needs of the proposed project. The project land uses are compatible with one another and lend themselves to the use of shared parking because the uses are complimentary (i.e., retail and restaurant), and people could often go there for more than one purpose in only one trip. For example, people going to the restaurant could utilize retail uses within the site, or office workers could utilize both the retail and restaurant uses; therefore, reducing the typical amount of parking demand required for the individual uses. In addition, the weekend peak parking demand for the office would be significantly less than during weekday conditions. The multi-use nature of the land uses at Bristol/1Narner Shopping Center lends itself to the reduction in overall parking generation as a result of the mix of land uses within the site. 2-1 31 ~8~3 2.2 Shared Parking Analysis RK has used procedures developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) from its 1983 publication, titled Shared Parking. A summary of the ULI study is included in j Appendix B. The ULI shared parking analysis evaluates the types of land uses, parking rates, monthly variations of parking demand by land use, differences between I . weekday and weekend parking demand, and the hourly distribution of peak parking i demand for each type of land use. The ULI procedures, with the exception of the parking rates provided by the ULI, were utilized in this study to evaluate peak parking demand that will occur at the ro osed Bristol/Warner Sho in Center. RK utilized p p pp g the latest parking rates published by the City of Santa Ana. RK used the proposed land uses in determining the project parking demand. Furthermore, each month of the year was evaluated, and the peak parking demand for both weekdays and weekends was determined utilizing data contained in the ULI Shared Parking report and the operational characteristics of the proposed land uses within the site. Peak parking demand for each land use at the Bristol/V1/arner Shopping Center was estimated using the City of Santa Ana parking requirements for individual land uses. Based upon these requirements for individual uses, total parking demand required for the site would be 495 parking spaces, as shown previously in Table 3. However, as previously noted, the City of Santa Ana is permitting an evaluation of mixed-use projects to take into account the multiple trips that people make within these types of developments. A computer spreadsheet was then developed, incorporating ULI shared parking procedures and ITE parking rates, to analyze the parking demand at the Bristol/V1/arner Shopping Center. The program was consistent with the procedures included in the ULI Shared Parking publication. The following inputs were included within the shared parking computer program for each land use: 1 31~$~4 1 1. Peak parking demand by land use. ~ 2. Parking rates provided by the ITE, which reflect current parking demand rates at ~- the site that were adjusted for vacant uses. 3. Weekday vs. weekend adjustment factors. ~. 4. Monthly adjustment factors to account for variations in parking demand over the year, which are shown in Table 4. f. i ,: The shared parking demand for individual uses takes into account the peak parking 1 _. characteristics of the retail/service, restaurant and bar uses. Each of these land uses has different peaking characteristics with respect to time of day and month of the year. Adjustments have been made to take into consideration both weekday and weekend peak conditions, based upon the individual types of uses. 2.3 Shared Parking Results Since the peak parking demand for each land use occurs at a different hour and also varies by month and day of the week, the peak parking demand is not solely determined by adding the individual peak parking required for each land use. Exhibits C and D indicate the hourly variation of parking demand for each land use at the Bristol/Vl/arner Shopping Center. As shown on these exhibits, the peak parking demand for each land use does not occur at the same time. This study finds that the month of December resulted in the highest peak parking demand during the year for the Bristol/VVarner Shopping Center. The computer output datasheets for the various months are included in Appendix C, and a summary of the peak parking demand for each month is included in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, the maximum parking demand on weekdays is 44Z parking spaces. Peak demand on weekends is 380 parking spaces. 2-3 31,A~ 5 The Bristol/Warner Shopping Center provides a total of 471 parking spaces. Based upon this shared parking analysis, the proposed land uses within the Bristol/Warner Shopping Center can be accommodated by the 471 parking spaces without creating an overflow parking situation. It is projected that there will be an excess of 29 spaces during weekdays and 91 spaces during weekends during the peak month of the year with full occupancy of the development for peak conditions. 31,~#4,~26 3.0 Overflow Parking Based upon the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for weekdays is ( projected to be 442 parking spaces and the peak weekend parking demand is projected to I. be 380 parking spaces. The Bristol/VVarner Shopping Center has 471 parking spaces; j-~ therefore, at least 29 parking spaces (6.2% of the total parking lot) should be available for any overflow parking needs during peak weekday conditions. ~_. I _. 3-1 - 311A~7 4.0 Findings The following findings have been determined by this shared parking analysis: The existing Bristol/V1/arner Shopping Center shopping center includes a total of 78,900 square feet of mixed uses with a total of 471 parking spaces throughout the complex. The site is proposed to include retail, restaurant, bar, and service uses. Based upon the City of Santa Ana Parking Code for individual uses, a total of 495 parking spaces would be required for the Bristol/VVarner Shopping Center. However, the shared parking concept is viable due to the mix of land uses. Utilizing the shared parking concept, peak parking demand for weekdays is estimated to be 442 spaces for weekdays and 380 spaces for weekends. The results of the parking demand survey (after adjusting for the peak month of the year and accounting for the existing vacant uses) indicate that the projected shared parking analysis is conservative, and more vacant parking spaces would actually be available within the site. 4-1 31~~-~8 5.0 Recommendations Monitor the peak parking demand at the Bristol/Warner Shopping Center in order to refine the parking management operations at the site. 5-1 31,~#~9 1 6.0 Conclusions i i The following conclusions have been reached with respect to the Bristol/V1/arner Shopping j Center mixed-use development: 1. The project consists of a mix of uses including retail, restaurant, bar and service uses, which are compatible from a shared parking standpoint. Peak parking demand will not occur simultaneously from all of the various uses. 2. Utilizing the shared parking concept, the parking demand for the project has been estimated to be approximately 442 parking spaces during peak weekday conditions and 380 parking spaces during peak weekend conditions. The project provides 471 parking spaces 3. Based upon the parking survey, the proposed parking demand can be accommodated within the proposed parking facility. 4. The project should monitor its peak parking demand to refine the parking management operations at the site. 6-1 311~-~ 0 Exh i b ids 31,~f~1 Exhibit A Location Nlap ~~3~_os-o5 ~~, engineering BRISTOL/WARNERSHOPPING CENTER, SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS, City of Santa Ana, California group, ~nCi. 31,,A~2 Exhibit B Site Plan i ~~3~_o5-os ~EXs, _ engineering BRISTOL/WARNER SHOPPING CENTER, SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS, City of Santa Ana,.California grOllp, inc. 31,~~ 3 Exhibit C Weekday H©uriy Parking ae~ands Weekday Parking Demand (Peak Month) 2,00 1,90 1,80 1,70 1,60 1,50 w 1,40 U 1,30 a a cn 1,20, C7 Y 1,101 a 1,00 a u. 901 O w 801 ~ 701 Z 60( 50( 40( 30( 20( 10( +Retail -f-Restaurant --~-~ Bar -~ TOTAL ~I~PARKING PROVIDED ~o°~P'l°~P ~°~P ~~~P o~~Pti ~~P o~'O ~°~ ~t;°~ 3 ~ ~~~ c;°~ ~o°~ 1°~ ~°~ ~;°~ .moo°~ ,~~°~ ~~,~° ~.`(;. TIME OF THE DAY N 1737-o5-a5 (ExC) 9ngin~eering BRISTOL/WARNER SHOPPING CENTER, SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS, City of Santa Ana, California rou inc 31,~#~4 Exhibit D Weekend Hourly Parking ®enlands Weekend Parking Demand (Peak Month) 2,000 1,900 1,800 1,700 1,600 1, 500 1,400 v 1,300 a uai 1,200 C7 ? 1,100 Y Q 1,000 a ~ 900 w 800 m ~ 700 z 600 500 400 - 300 - 200 - 100 - 0 -I -••--Retail --i-Restaurant dr-• Bar ->~ TOTAL -SPARKING PROVIDED P~ ~~ ~~ P~ ~~ P~ o~ Q~ Q~` Q~ Q~ Q~ Q~ Q~ Q~ Q~` Q~ Q~ ~~o 60° ,~o° ~o° ~o° ~oo° ~,~o° °°~O ,~o° ryo° ~o° ~o° ho° ~o° ,~o° ~o° ~o° ~oo° ~,~o° ~~°o ~ti' TIME OF THE DAY N 1737-OS-05 (ExD) BRISTOLNVARNER SHOPPING CENTER, SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS, ~y~f 5/~ta A~},~ifornta 1 f engineering ; group, inc. Tables 3'~~~6 TABLE 1 Existing Land Uses Unit Tenant Retail/Service Restaurant Bar Furniture Store Vacant Total 1200A Panda Bowl 1,422 1,422 12008 Boutique Salon 695 695 12000 Seoul House 695 695 1200E Check Cashing 1,390 1,390 1200E King Water Juice Bar 695 695 New Building 2,013 2,013 New Building 1,773 1,773 2307A Ducks Donuts 1,033 1,033 23076 Super Antojitos Meat Market 3,381 3,381 2307C. Super Antojitos Mexican 1,288 1,288 2315 Tony's Barber Shop 797 797 2321 Home Town Buffet 8,673 8,673 2327 Susie's Deals #58 3,676 3,676 2335 Lucy's Bridal 593 593 2337A CSK Auto Inc. #1516 5,489 .5,489 23378 Video One 1,914 1,914 2341 Furniture for less 5,351 5,351 2343 Las Vegas Bar 2,628 2,628 24078 Hollywood Video #005-990 5,055 5,055 99 99~ Only Store 30,339 30,339 Total 53,329 13,806 2,628 5,351 3,786 78,900 j:~rktables~RK4235TB.xls -~ hV:1737-05-OS 31~~ 7 TABLE 2 Proposed Land Uses Unit Tenant Retail/Service Restaurant Bar Vacant Total 1200A Panda Bowl 1,422 1,422 12006 Bouti ue Salon 695 695 12000 Seoul House 695 695 1200E Check Cashing 1,390 1,390 1200E King Water Juice Bar 695 695 New Building Starbucks 2,013 2,013 New Building New Restaurant 1,773 1,773 2307A Ducks Donuts 1,033 1,033 23078 Super Antojitos Meat Market 3,381 3,381 2307C Super AntojitosMexican's 1,288 1,288 2315 Tony's Barber Shop 797 797 2321 Home Town Buffet 8,673 8,673 2327 Susie's Deals #58 3,676 3,676 2335 Lucy's Bridal 593 593 2337A CSK Auto Inc. #1516 5,489 5,489 23376 Video One 1,914 1,914 2341 Retail Use 5,351 5,351 2343 Las Vegas Bar 2,628 2,628 24076 Hollywood Video #005- 990 5,055 5,055 99 99¢` Only Store 30,339 30,339 Total 58,680 17,592 2,628 0 78,900 j:UkiablesV?K4235TB 31~-~ 8 1N:1737-OS-OS TABLE 3 i Proposed Project Parking Requirements Per City Code Land Use Quanti ' Re uired Parkin Ratio Re uired Parkin Retail/Service 58,680 S. F. 1 space per 200 S.F. 293 Restaurant 17,592 S.F. 1 space per 100 S.F. 176 Bare 2,628 S.F. 1 space per 100 S.F. 26 Total 78,900 495 S.F. =Square Feet 'i j:~rktables~RK4235T8 lN:1737-05-05 31~~~ 9 TABLE 4 Monthly Demand Variation as Percentage of Peak Month Month Retail Restaurant Bar January 65% 84% 84% February 65% 84% 84% March 70% 94% 94% April 70% 93% 93% May 70% 97% 97% Jun 75% 96% 96% July 75% 98% 98% August 75% 100% 100% September 75% 92% 92% October 75% 95% 95% November 80% 92% 92% December 100% 96% 96% j: ~rktables~HK4235TB.xls 1N:1737-05-05 31~~40 TABLE 5 Bristol/Warner Shopping Center Santa Ana Monthly Peak Parking Demand Month Weekdays Weekend January 331 277 February 331 277 March 363 304 April 362 303 May 370 310 June 380 318 July 383 321 August 388 324 September 372 311 October 378 316 November 384 20 December 442 ~ 380 2 Maximum Demand 442 380 Parking Provided 471 471 Number of Surplus Spaces 29 91 Percent Surplus Spaces 6.2% 19.3% ' Peak month for weekdays z Peak Month for weekends j:\rktables\RK4235TB 3'I~>-~ 1 JN:1737-05-05 Appendices 31~~2 Appendix A City of Santa Ana Parking Code 31~~ 3 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING PARKING ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING DIVISION 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS parking Sec. 41-1300. Location of required off-street parking. Page 1 of 19 Parking facilities shall be located on the same lot or site or on a lot or site contiguous thereto. Any property used for required parking shall be under the same ownership as the uses served or shall be restricted in such a manner as to prevent the severance of the parking facilities and use by sale, trade, lease or any other conveyance. {Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1301. Prohibition against display of vehicles, trailers, vessels and other personal property for sate. (a) No person shall park or place a vehicle, trailer, or vessel or other personal property upon a public or private street, parking lot or any public or private property~for the purpose of displaying such vehicle, trailer, vessel or other personal property thereon for sale, hire or rental, or for other advertising purposes, unless said property is properly zoned by the city for such purpose and the vendor is duly licensed to transact such business at that location. (b) Subsection (a) shall not prohibit any person from parking or placing a vehicle or vessel or other personal property on private residential property belonging to or occupied by the owner of such vehicle, vessel or other personal property, for the purpose of displaying the same for sale, hire or rental. (c) "Vehicle" as used in this section shall mean a "vehicle" as defined in Section 670 of the California Vehicle Code, as the same now reads or may hereafter be amended. (d) "Vessel" as used in this section shall mean a "vessel" as defined in Section 9840 (a) of the California Vehicle Code, as the same now reads or may hereafter be amended. (e) The parking or placing of any vehicle or vessel or other personal property with a sign or other advertising device thereon or proximate thereto, indicating such vehicle or vessel or other personal property is for sale, hire or rental, shall constitute prima facie evidence that such vehicle, vessel or other personal property was parked or placed for the purpose displaying same for sale, hire or rental, or other advertising. (f) A violation of this section shall constitute an infraction punishable in the same manner as provided in section 36-27 of this Code, as the same now reads or may hereafter be amended. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 1, 12-15-97) parking Sec. 41-1302. Prohibition against use of required parking spaces for other purposes. 29 of 82 httn://librarv6.municode.com/~atewav.dlUc~a'~i~l~ 15/3154/3169?f=templates$fn=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 2 of 19 (a) No person shall use or allow the use of any parking space or area designed for the parking of vehicles, and necessary to provide parking spaces in full or partial satisfaction of the off-street parking requirements of this chapter, for any purpose which obstructs or prevents the use of such parking space or area for the parking of vehicles on a regular basis. (b) The use of a required parking space for the storage of any automobile for more than seventy-two (72) hours, or for the storage of equipment, shall be deemed to be an obstruction or activity which prevents the use of such parking space for the parking of vehicles on a regular basis within the meaning of subsection (a} of this section. (c) Subsection (b) does. not apply to the parking of a vehicle at a residence provided the vehicle is operational and the parking of the vehicle does not conflict with access and parking of other vehicles. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 2, 12-15-97) parking Sec. 41-1303. Dimension of parking area and access. (a) Open and garage parking stalls shall not be less than eight (8) feet six (6) inches wide and eighteen (18) .feet long. Where double-striping is required and the width of stalls shall be measured from lines midway between each pair of stripes. Structural, mechanical, utility or similar appurtenances are only permitted adjacent to required stall areas if the required width of the stall is increased at least six (6) inches and' if ~ the appurtenance is not located so as to interfere with safe and free parking movement or car door opening or of visibility. No appurtenance shall be permitted in the area in front of a parked car unless located in its entirety at least four (4) feet above surface level. Parking lot lights and tree wells, however, may encroach no greater than eighteen (18) inches into a front corner of a parking stall. (b) Aisles to and from parking stalls shall not be less than: (1) Thirteen (13) feet wide for one-way aisles with thirty-degree parking. (2) Fifteen (15) feet wide for one-way aisles with forty-five-degree parking. (3) Eighteen (18) feet wide for one-way aisles with sixty-degree parking. (4) Twenty-three (23) feet wide for ninety-degree parking. (c) Circulation within a parking area must be such that: (1) A car entering the parking area need not enter a street to reach another aisle except on a street with a standard industrial street cross section. (2) A car need not enter a street backwards. This provision shall not apply to off-street parking required in sections 41-1320 and 41-1321, or prohibit the backing of motor vehicles into a street which has a standard industrial street cross-section regardless of the use on the lot abutting said industrial street. (3) All parking stalls and garages shall be accessible and usable. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 3, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1304. Maintenance and operation. (a) Bumper guards, curbs or other suitable barriers shall be provided to protect public streets and sidewalks, to prevent parking in areas where no parking is permitted, to 31~1~5 ~ ~-- --- ,,, ~__ ~..,.vr_~_.. innti cis y c.f i~ ~ ~n~-r F~,.~,.1.,+a~4'r;-_,a., ~ici~nnc l ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 3 of 19 1 -~ prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the parking area boundary line or intruding into any pedestrian walkway, and to prevent vehicles from contacting any wall, fence or landscaped area. (b) When the parking area abuts residentially zoned property, property used for residential purposes, or sensitive land uses, a minimum six-foot high masonry wall shall be erected along such property lines, except that such wall shall not exceed four (4) feet in height along any required front yard of the adjacent property. (c) Lights used to illuminate the parking area shall be reflected away from any residence or sensitive land use. (d) All required stalls shall be clearly outlined with double-striping on the surface of the lot. ~ (e) The parking area and driveways shall be paved with asphaltic or concrete surfacing. (f) All parking areas shall be accessible to vehicles via driveways and aisles of the size specified herein. (g) Cart corrals shall be provided throughout parking lots for uses that rely on shopping carts for normal business operations. l (h) Sensitive land uses as used in this section are those adjacent land uses such as child care facilities, parks, schools, churches, convalescent homes, and hospitals that t will be potentially impacted by the proposed parking lot and ancillary parking activities. ;' (i) All parking areas required by this chapter are to be maintained in a safe, clean and repaired state with no potholes, solid paving, and legible striping. ~ ~ ~ (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 4, 12-15-97; Ord. No. NS-2446, § 23, 9- 18-00) i ~ Sec. 41-1305. Loading space requirements. Every building involving the receipt or distribution by vehicle of materials or merchandise incidental to carrying on such activity shall be provided with at least one (1) space for standing, loading and unloading of vehicles to avoid undue interference with the public use of on-site l travel aisles, streets and alleys. Such space shall be provided at a size sufficient to accommodate the largest delivery vehicle likely for the building and in no case be less than ten (10) feet by twenty-five (25) feet. Loading zones shall be provided at a rate of one (1) for every ten thousand (10,000) square feet of floor area or outdoor storage area. Afourteen-foot minimum height clearance shall be maintained. Loading zones shall not interfere with or be used for off-street parking purposes. Loading zones shall be clearly designated and labeled, and may not be located adjacent to property used or zoned- for residential purposes. 1 (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 5, 12-15-97) l parking Sec. 41-1306. Handicapped parking. (a) Number. A portion of the required off-street parking spaces required for any use by this chapter shall be designed for physically handicapped persons in accordance with - state law and the following standards: _._ TABLE INSET: 31 of 82 r,,+„•//lihrarcrK mnnir.nrlP nnm/aatPwav rlll/n~l'~i~15/3154/3169?~temnlates$fn=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page4of19 Total Number of Parking Spaces Number of Spaces or Handicapped Persons 1-25 1 26-50 51-75 3 76-100 101-150 5 151-200 6 201-300 7 301-400 8 01-500 9 501-1,000 2% of total Over 1,000 20 plus 1 for each 100 spaces provided over 1,000 (b) Design, designation, and location. Handicapped persons' parking spaces shall, at a minimum, comply with the requirements of the California Building Code, Division 11, Site Accessibility. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2176, § 5, 9-21-92; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 6, 12- 15-97) Sec: 41-1307. Motorcycle spaces. Any site which has five hundred (500) or more parking spaces sfiall provide, for the first five hundred (500) spaces and one (1) for each two hundred fifty (250) spaces thereafter, a seventeen-foot by eighteen-foot motorcycle parking area, bordered by bumper guards or concrete curb to preclude automobile access to such area.Motorcycle spaces are to be clearly designated and located near the main entrance of the primary structures on-site. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 7, 12-15-97) parking Sec. 41-1308. Prohibition against separate charge for parking on multiple-family residential property. (a) No owner or agent of any owner of multiple-family residential property shall impose any charge on any resident for the privilege of parking in the off-street parking spaces on such property which is separate and distinct from the rent charged to such 31~~~7 •.. .~, ~ , - i ,,,i__i._ie.e_._._'_inn~e/~~eei~~enn~a_..V__1,.c._.~lh.f:_.-.7 ,, oie~~nne ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 5 of 19 resident for such resident's dwelling unit. ._. (b) Any owner or agent of an owner of residential property who is not in compliance _~ with subsection (a) of this section on November 19, 1990, shall have sixty (60) days from and after such date to discontinue such noncompliance. Thereafter any such noncompliance shall be unlawful. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1,,11-19-90) Sec. 41-1309. Interpretation of standards. In interpreting the parking standards set forth in this article, the following rules shall govern: (1) Wherever required off-street parking is based upon gross floor area, the number of required spaces shall be determined by applying the appropriate mathematical ratio. If the product is not a whole number, the number of required spaces shall be the next lower natural number if the decimal fraction is less than five-tenths (0.5) or the next higher natural number if the decimal fraction is five- . tenths (0.5) or more. Wherever required off-street parking is based upon some other factor, the number of required spaces shall be determined by the same arithmetical process. (2) Wherever two (2) or more uses identified in this article exist on the. same site or within the same building: a. The number of parking spaces required for each use shall be determined separately. _ b. Except as provided in sections 41-1390 and 41-1391, ancillary activities or uses within a single tenant space not exceeding fifteen (15) percent of the gross floor area shall be calculated at the parking ratio of the primary use. (3) Wherever a particular use of property can be classified under more than one (1) section of this article which sets minimum parking space requirements, the section which contains the more specific use description shall apply. If two (2) or more equally specific sections apply, the section imposing the higher standard shall apply. (4) Wherever required parking is based upon the number of seats in an area, eighteen (18) inches of bench space shall be deemed the equivalent of one (1) seat. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 8, 12-15-97; Ord. No. NS-2404, § 2,-9- 20-99) parking Sec. 41-1310. In-lieu parking fee districts. (a) The city council may, by resolution, establish one (1) or more in-lieu parking fee districts whereby property owners within any such district may receive a credit toward the number of off-street parking spaces otherwise required by this article by the payment of an in-lieu parking fee to be used by the city for the future provision of public parking facilities serving the district. (b) Eligibility for the reception of an off-street parking credit shall be limited to: (1) the use and occupancy of existing buildings which lack sufficient parking spaces on site to 33 of 82 l~,+r,•//lihrarvh mnnirnr~P rnm/aatPwav.c111/ca1'r~a~f'~~15/3154/3169?~teinplates$fii=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 6 of 19 satisfy the requirements of this article and which no longer have such status as a nonconforming use or nonconforming building which would allow them to be used and "'^'- occupied without the provision of such parking; and (2) the intensification of use in an -~ existing building. Such eligibility shall not extend to new building construction, nor to additions to existing buildings or the reconstruction of existing buildings even if such reconstruction does not increase existing or previous occupant load. (c) Any resolution of the city council establishing an in-lieu parking fee district shall set forth the fee to be charged for each parking space for which an off-street parking credit shall be granted to an owner of eligible property within the district. Such resolution may also set forth such provisions as the council may determine .appropriate for payment of the fee in installments over a period of years. The responsibility for such installment payments shall run with the ownership of the property. (d) All revenues received by the city from the payment of in-lieu parking fees from owners of property within an in-lieu parking district shall be maintained in an account separate and apart from other city funds. Moneys in such account may be expended solely for the purpose of providing additional public parking in the district. (e) No owner of property within an in-lieu parking fee district may receive any off- street parking credit pursuant to this section except pursuant to a parking plan approved for that property by the executive director of the community development agency of the city or his or her designated representative. The parking plan shall specify the number of parking spaces required to be provided on the property and the number of parking spaces for which off-street parking credits are granted. (f) A parking plan may be revoked by the executive director of the community development agency of the city or his or her designated representative for failure by the owner of that property to pay installment payments on the in-lieu parking fee due for that property, and shall be reinstated upon the payment of all installments due. During such time as a parking plan is revoked: (1) the property shall not be credited with off- street parking credits for purposes of determining its compliance with the off- street parking requirements of this chapter; and (2) no further certificates of occupancy shall be issued for the property under the building code of the city. (Ord. No. NS-2309, § 1, 12-2-96; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 9, 12-15-97) Secs. 41-1311--41-1319. Reserved. DIVISION 2. RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS Sec. 41-1320. Single-family dwellings. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for single-family dwellings are as follows: four (4) spaces. (b) Of the spaces required by subsection (a), two (2) spaces shall be in an enclosed garage. The remaining spaces may be tandem spaces in a driveway. (Ord. No. NS-2087, § 1, 10-1-90; Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1321. Two-family and three-family dwellings. 3'~94f~49 t._,.__.lna____~.c.~__~:..~a....,._._/~~a,,...,._..711/,,.,1,,.,1:~'-..-..;,,/7(1'IC/'I~G~/~1~h~F=+~„~,,..1~+~~4'~,=.a r, S?J~'!'7(1f1S ARTICLE ~,'V. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 7 of 19 (a) The minimum off-streefi parking requirements for each dwelling unit in a two- ~., family or three-family dwelling are as follows: three (3) spaces plus one (1) additional _~ space for each bedroom in excess of two (2) bedrooms. (b) Of the spaces required by subsection (a), two (2) spaces shall be in an enclosed garage. The remaining spaces. may be tandem spaces in a driveway, provided such driveway spaces may not obstruct access to parking spaces serving any other unit. (Ord. No. NS-2087, § 1, 10-1-90; Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1322. Multiple-family dwellings. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for each dwelling unit in multiple- ( family dwellings are as follows: one (1) space in a garage or carport. I (b) Each multiple-family dwelling site shall provide off-street parking spaces, in addition to the minimum requirements of subsection (a) of this section, in an amount not less than the number of bedrooms on the site. Such spaces may be open or covered ' and may be assigned to particular units or not so assigned. Bachelor units shall be considered as one-bedroom units. (c) In addition to the minimum requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, each multiple-family, dwelling site shall provide guest parking, identified as such, in an i amount of spaces not less than twenty-five (25) percent of the minimum required spaces under subsections (a) and (b) of this section, but in no case less than three (3) spaces. (Ord. No. NS-2087, § 1, 10-1-90; Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 10, 12- 15-97) Sec. 41-1323. Care homes. ` The minimum off-street parking requirements for care homes are as follows: one (1) space for each three (3) beds. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1324. Lodging houses. 1 The minimum off-street parking requirements for lodging houses are as follows: one (1) space for each guest room or one (1) space for each one hundred fifty (150) square feet of sleeping area, whichever is greater, plus two (2) enclosed spaces for use by the operator of the lodging house and two (2) guest spaces. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) -l .Sec. 41-1325. Senior citizen establishments. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for senior citizen establishments, pertaining to spaces reserved for residents who are sixty-two (62) years of age or older.,. are as follows: one (1) space for each one-bedroom dwelling unit; one and one-half (1.5) _ spaces for each two-bedroom dwelling unit. (b) Of the spaces required by subsection (a), at least one (1) space per unit shall be in 3 of 8 t,+-t„~I/1;1„-a,-~,~ ,-,,,,,,;rmerle.rnm/~-atewav.dlUc~c'~1~15/3154/3169?~templates$fn=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page8of19 a garage or under a carport. (c} In addition to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, senior. citizen establishments shall provide guest parking spaces, identified as such, in an amount not less than fifteen (15) percent of the minimum number of spaces required under subsection (a) of this section. Such guest parking spaces shall be open and outside of any secured area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1326. Bed and breakfast establishments. The minimum off-street parking requirements for bed and breakfast establishments are as follows: one (1) space for each guest room, plus two (2) enclosed spaces for the operator of the establishment. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1327. Fraternity and sorority houses and dormitories. The minimum off-street parking requirements for fraternity and sorority houses and dormitories are as follows: one (1) space for each two (2) beds or one (1) space for each eighty (80) square feet of sleeping area, whichever is greater. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1328. Trailer and mobile home parks. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for trailer or mobile home parks are as follows: two (2) spaces for each trailer unit. (b) Of the spaces required by subsection (a), at least one (1) space for each unit shall be covered. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 11, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1329. Caretaker quarters. The minimum off-street parking requirements for caretaker quarters are as follows: two (2) spaces. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Secs. 41-1330--41-1339. Reserved. DIVISION 3. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE STANDARDS Sec. 41-1340. Retail stores and service uses. The minimum off-street parking requirements for retail and service uses not otherwise 31~r~ 1 ~...-..ni'~-_----_~.---_t__~___..__/~_i___..._..711/,,../.,..1:F._..;.,h(1'1C/2lr.i1/21~(]7~F-4c~rr.a~~a+aod.`fncr~„ Qisi~nn~ ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 9 of 19 - specified in this division are as follows: five (5) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) 1 square feet of gross floor area. _ ~ (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1341. Restaurants, cafes, etc. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for restaurants, cafes and other eating establishments are as follows: ten (10) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area and open-air dining area except that an open-air dining area no greater than twenty-five (25) percent of the gross floor area of the restaurant, or one thousand (1,000) square feet, whichever is smaller, is exempt from a parking requirement. l ~ (b) Each drive-through eating establishment shall have vehicular stacking lanes of at least eighty (80) feet from the pick-up window to the order point, and eighty (80) feet from the order point to the end of the drive-through lane. Such stacking lanes shall be located so that they do not serve as entries to parking spaces. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 12, 12-15-97) i Sec. 41-1342. Offices, business and professional. F The minimum off-street parking requirements for business and professional offices, ' including psychologists, are as follows: three (3) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square ~ feet of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 13, 12-15-97) f ~ Sec. 41-1343. Open retail. The minimum off-street parking requirements for plant nurseries (except for those in 1 conjunction with a home improvement store), vehicle sales and other primarily open-air retail uses are as follows: two (2} spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of display and storage area, plus four (4) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of office area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 14, 12-15-97) _1 Sec. 41-1344. Hotels and motels. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for hotels and motels are as follows: one (1) space for each guest room, plus one (1) space for each ten (10) rooms, plus two (2) spaces for a manager's unit, if provided. (b) Except for facilities limited to the exclusive use of guests, parking shall be provided for restaurants, banquet facilities and other retail services or recreational uses included in a hotel or motel building or grounds in accordance with the requirements of this article for such uses. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 15, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1345. Reserved. Editor's note: Section 41-1345 has been deleted by the editor, inasmuch as it appears to 37 of httn • //lihrarvfi.muni cede. com/Qatewav.dlUci~ca~i/~~ 15/3154/3169?f=templates$fn=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 10 of 19 have been superseded by Ord. No. NS-2340, § 15, adopted Dec. 15, 1997, codified as § 41- 1344 of this chapter. Said § 41-1345 pertained to motels, and was derived from Ord. No. NS- "~"', 2091, § 1, adopted Nov. 19, 1990. Sec. 41-1346. Medical, dental, psychiatric and chiropractic offices and clinics. The minimum off-street parking requirements for medical, dental, psychiatric, and chiropractic offices and clinics are as follows: six (6) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area but in no case less than six (6) spaces. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 16, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1347. Automobile repair and automobile servicing. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for automobile repair and automobile servicing facilities are as follows: Five (5) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. (b) Vehicle repair bays in automobile repair and automobile servicing facilities shall not be counted as parking spaces. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2099, § 1, 12-17-90; Ord. No. NS-2118, § 15, 3- 18-91; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 17, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1348. Banks and financial institutions. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for banks and other financial institutions are as follows: four {4) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area, plus two (2) spaces for each walk-up automatic teller machine. (b) Each drive-in service window in a bank or other financial institution shall have a vehicular stacking lane of at least one hundred twenty (120) feet in length. Such stacking lane shall be located so that it does not serve as an entryway to parking spaces. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 18, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1349. Furniture and appliance stores. The minimum off-street parking requirements for furniture and appliance stores are as follows: two (2) spaces for each one thousand (1,000} square feet of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1350. Laundromats. The minimum off-street parking requirements for laundromats are as follows: six (6) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1351. Hospitals and other medical care facilities. 31~,~3 ,,, •, .- , - - - --- ~--'------- ~7i i__ i__isr___._:.. inns cis i cn l~ 7 ~no~-+o,Y,-,1~+o~Q'~,-Ar, Q/G/7n/1S ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 11 of 19 I The minimum off-street parking requirements for hospitals and other medical care ^._. facilities [are as follows]: two (2) spaces for each patient bed. --~ - (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1352. Union halls. The minimum off-street parking requirements for union halls are as follows: three (3) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area of office area, plus one (1) space for each twenty-eight (28) square feet of assembly floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 19, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1353. Bulk merchandise stores. i The minimum off-street parking requirements for bulk merchandise stores are as follows: eight (8) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1354. Lumberyards. The minimum off-street parking requirements for lumberyards are as follows: five (5) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area of building space, plus two (2) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of outdoor sales or storage area. J (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) 1 l Sec. 41-1355. Car washes. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for self-service car washes are as follows: two (2) spaces per washing bay. In addition, an area for vehicles of at least ten (10) feet by twenty (20) feet is to be provided adjacent to each air, water, vacuum and telephone facility. (b) The minimum off-street parking requirements for automatic car washes are as follows: two (2) spaces. Automatic car washes shall also have a vehicular stacking lane at least sixty (60) feet long at the entrance. An area for vehicles of at least ten (10) feet by twenty (20) feet shall also be provided adjacent to each air, water, vacuum and telephone facility. (c} The minimum off-street parking requirements for full-service car washes are as follows: five (5) spaces. Full-service car washes shall also provide the following: (1) A drying area equal to at least twenty (20) parking spaces. (2) A vehicular approach lane at least one hundred twenty (120) feet in length. (3) An area for vehicles of at least ten (10) feet by twenty (20) feet adjacent to each air, water, vacuum and telephone facility. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 20, 12-15-97) _l 3 of A ' h~-r„•//l~h,-a,-~~~ m~~ninnrlP rnm/uatewa.v_clll/c~~i~'+~15/3154/3169?f=templates$fn=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 12 of 19 Sec. 41-1356. Indoor swap meets. The minimum off-street parking requirements for indoor swap meets are as follows: ten (10) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1357. Service stations. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for service stations which are limited to the dispensing of motor fuel are as follows: two (2) spaces. (b) The minimum off-street parking requirements for service stations having repair and/or retail facilities are as follows: one (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area. (c) No additional spaces are needed for an automatic (drive-through) car wash, however, asixty-foot stacking lane is required. Other types of car washes require parking as specified in this article. (d) Service stations .shall also provide an area for vehicles of at least ten (10) feet by twenty (20) feet adjacent to each air, water, vacuum and telephone facility. (e) Vehicle repair bays in service stations shall not be counted as parking spaces. (f) Fifty (50) percent of fuel island vehicle parking area may be counted toward not more than one-half (1/2) of the number of any parking spaces required due to floor area used for retail purposes (auto repair excluded). (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 21, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1358. Motorcycle repair. The minimum off-street parking requirement for motorcycle, ATV, motor scooter, moped, small engine and similar repair shops are as follows: one (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2340, § 22, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1359. Banquet facilities. Banquet facilities, as a freestanding use, shall be parked at the rate of one (1) parking stall pertwenty-eight (28) s.f. of activity/assembly area. Whenever the parking requirement for a banquet facility as an ancillary use exceeds the parking requirement for the primary use, the banquet facility shall be parked at the rate of one (1) parking stall per twenty-eight (28) s.f. of activity/assembly area. Provided however, banquet facilities ancillary to a restaurant or eating establishment shall be parked at the restaurant rate of ten (10) parking stalls per one thousand (1,000) s.f. of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2340, § 23, 12-15-97; Ord. No. NS-2446, § 24, 9-18-00) Sec. 41-1360. Car rental agencies. The minimum off-street parking required for car rental agencies is one (1) space for 31~,~5 ~ ., in•i i __ ~._- t -----~_._~-_______ _7YY/_../....1:.F ......:../7(IlU'llCit/'21~.n7~-4c>mr~7o+coQ'~i-~cr~n Q/ri~7nn5 l ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 13 of 19 -1 each two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area and one (1) space for each rental vehicle stored on-site. _ ~ (Ord. No. NS-2340, § 24, 12-15-97) Secs. 41-1361--41-1369. Reserved. DIVISION 4. ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATIONAL USES Sec. 41-1370. Golf driving ranges. The minimum off-street parking requirements for golf driving ranges are as follows: one (1) space per driving tee. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 25, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1371. Golf courses, bowling alleys and batting cages. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for golf courses, including miniature golf courses, bowling alleys and batting cages are as follows: three (3) spaces per hole, alley or cage. (b) In addition, off-street parking for restaurants and other retail, service or recreational uses appurtenant to a golf course, bowling alley or batting cage shall be provided at a rate of seventy-five (75) percent of the requirements of this article for such uses. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 26, 12-15-97) 1 Sec. 41-1372. Theaters and auditoriums. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for movie theaters, stage theaters and auditoriums are as follows: one (1) space for each three (3) fixed seats, plus one (1) space for each twenty-eight (28) square feet of assembly area. (b) Theaters and auditoriums shall also provide a passenger loading/unloading zone. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1373. Stadiums, skating rinks, gymnasiums, sports arenas, convention facilities, etc. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for stadiums, skating rinks, gymnasiums, sports arenas, meeting and convention facilities, and similar places of public assembly are as follows: one (1) space for each four (4) fixed seats, plus one (1) space for each twenty-eight (28) square feet of assembly area. -1 (b) Stadiums, skating rinks, gymnasiums, sports arenas, meeting and convention facilities and similar places of public assembly shall also provide a passenger loading/unloading zone. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) 1 f8 httn://librarv6.municode.com/~ateway.dlUca~a~~~ 15!3154!3169?~templates$fn=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 14 of 19 Sec. 41-1374. Bingo parlors, pool halls and game arcades. The minimum off-street parking requirements for bingo parlors, pool halls and game arcades are as follows: one (1) space for each four (4) seats in a bingo parlor, plus one (1) space for each video game, plus two (2) spaces for each pool table or other gaming device. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1375. Exercise gyms, spas, health clubs, etc. The minimum off-street parking requirements for exercise gyms, spas, health clubs and similar facilities are as follows: one (1) space for each twenty-eight (28) square feet of floor area devoted to physical activity other than racquetball or handball (exclusive of locker rooms, shower facilities, utility rooms and ancillary public areas), plus two and one-half (2.5) spaces for each racquetball and handball court. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1375.5. Martial arts, gymnastics, and dance studios. The minimum off-street parking requirement for martial arts, gymnastics, and dance studios where no food or beverage service is provided is as follows: one (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2340, § 27, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1376. Lodges, clubs and dance halls. The minimum off-street parking requirements for lodges without sleeping quarters, clubs and dance halls are as follows: one (1) space for each twenty-eight (28) square feet of assembly area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1377. Carnivals. - The minimum off-street parking requirements for carnivals are as follows: three (3) spaces for each booth or ride. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1378. Circuses. The minimum off-street parking requirements for circuses are as follows: one (1) space for each four (4) seats. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) 31~-,,~7 - ,_.~__,„~,----~------.~_-~_ ..~___~~..~,,._..._, a7,~....1,.,.,:.~ ._...;~/7(11U'~7GAJ1"1~(1'~f': +o,-,-,,.i.,t.,~a~-~:,-,a -, Qici~nn~ ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING 1 Page 15 of 19 Sec. 41-1379. Dance clubs, cabarets, night clubs and bars. The minimum off-street parking requirements for dance clubs, cabarets, night clubs and bars are as follows: one (1) space for each twenty-eight (28) square feet of assembly area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2100, § 2, 12-10-90) Secs. 41-1380--41-1389. Reserved. DIVISION 5. INDUSTRIAL USES Sec. 41-1390. Manufacturing facilities. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for manufacturing uses are as follows: two (2) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of production area. (b) Office space exceeding thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of a manufacturing facility must meet the off-street parking requirements for office use. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 28, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1391. Warehouses distribution, wholesale, data centers and commercial storage uses. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for warehouses distribution, wholesale, data centers and commercial storage uses are as follows: One (1) space for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. (b) Office space exceeding thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of the warehouse or wholesale use must meet the off-street parking requirements for office use. (c) For purposes of this section, "distribution" means a facility which dispenses, divides, and/ordeals goods or materials on a regular basis, other than sales at retail. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2275, § 23, 12-18-95; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 29, 12-15-97; Ord. No. NS-2494, § 11, 4-15-02) Editor's note: Ord. No. NS-2494, § 11, adopted April 15, 2002, changed the title of § 41-1391 from "Warehouses and distribution and wholesale uses" to "Warehouses distribution, wholesale, data centers and commercial storage uses." The historical notation has been preserved for reference purposes. Sec. 41-1392. Bulk storage yards and wholesale lumberyards. The minimum off-street parking requirements for bulk storage yards and wholesale lumberyards are as follows: one (1) space for each ten thousand (10,000) square feet of lot area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1393. Salvage yards, wrecking yards and impound yards. 4 of httn://librarv6.municode.com/gateway.dlllca~a~i~'$15/3154/3169?f--templates$fiz=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 16 of 19 The minimum off-street parking requirements for salvage yards, wrecking yards and impound yards are as follows: four (4) spaces for each ten thousand (10,000) square feet of lot area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1394. Mini-warehouses. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for mini-warehouses are as follows: (1) For the first nine hundred (900) storage units: one (1) space for each one hundred fifty (150) units. (2) For storage units in excess of nine hundred (900): one (1) space for each three hundred (300) units. (b) The spaces required by subsection (a) of this section shall be located outside of any secured storage unit area. (c) Two (2) parking spaces shall be provided for any on-site management unit on a mini-warehouse site. (d) Vehicular aisles on mini-warehouse sites shall be at least thirty (30) feet wide. (Ord. No. NS-2091, ~ 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1395. Wholesale machinery and office equipment establishments. The minimum off-street parking requirements for wholesale machinery and office equipment establishments are as follows: two (2) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1396. Passenger transportation services. The minimum off-street parking requirements for passenger transportation services are as follows: two (2) parking spaces per one thousand (1,000) square feet of building area and one (1) parking space for every two (2) fleet vehicles stored and intended for operation in connection with said use. (Ord.. No. NS-2340, § 30, 12-15-97; Ord. No. NS-2470, § 8, 5-21-01) Sec. 41-1397. Freight, bus and truck terminals. The minimum off-street parking requirement for freight, bus and truck terminals is as follows: two (2) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building area, and one (1) parking space for every two fleet vehicles stored and intended for operation in connection with said use. (Ord. No. NS-2470, § 9, 5-21-01) Secs. 41-1398--41-1399. Reserved. 31~Q-~9 l~+tr+•//lil~rarc~Fi rn~tnirnrla rnm/cTatat~ra~~ r111/ra/ralifnrnia/'X915/~15G/~1Fi9~f=1QtZ~t?~^nFP.~~=~'~~=(jn... R/5~2nn5 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Page 17 of 19 l .l ,~ DIVISION 6. EDUCATIONAL USES ~_ Sec. 41-1400. Elementary schools and junior high schools. The minimum off-street parking requirements for elementary schools and junior high schools are as follows: one and one-half (1 1/2) spaces for each classroom, plus one (1) space for each three hundred thirty-three (333) square feet of office floor area. l (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 31, 12-15-97) Sec. 41-1401. Nigh schools. The minimum off-street parking requirements for high schools are as follows: one (1) space for each one hundred fifty (150) square feet of classroom floor area, plus one (1) space for each three hundred thirty-three (333) square feet of office floor area. ~ (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) ~ Sec. 41-1402. Colleges, trade schools, business schools and adult education i facilities. The minimum off-street parking requirements for colleges, trade schools, business ,~ schools and adult education facilities are as follows: one (1) space for each forty (40) square feet of classroom floor area, plus one (1) space for each three hundred thirty-three (333) square feet of office floor area. j (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) J Sec. 41-1403. Museums, art galleries, amusement attractions and libraries. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for museums, art galleries, amusement attractions and libraries are as follows: one (1) space for each two hundred _' (200) square feet of floor area open to the public including assembly or conference facilities, and food facilities for the exclusive use of on-site patrons. Administrative office 1 space is to be parked at one (1) space per three hundred thirty-three (333) feet of floor 1 area. Restaurants open to the public are to be parked as provided for in this article. (b) Museums and libraries shall also provide one (1) bus parking stall for the first ten thousand (10,000) square feet of public area and one (1) space for each five thousand (5,000) square feet of floor area open to the public thereafter. { (c) Museums, art galleries and libraries shall also provide a passenger J loading/unloading zone. (d) Theaters in conjunction with such facilities shall be parked per the provisions of this article. J (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2299, § 2, 9-3-96; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 32, 12- ~' 15-97) 1 4 of 8 htt„ • /~t;hrarvfi .mini c~cie. cam /~atewav.dlUc~~i~ 15/3154/3169?f=templates$ fn=do... 8/5/2005 ARTICLE XV. OFF-STREET PARKING Secs. 41-1404--41-1409. Reserved. DIVISION 7. MISCELLANEOUS USES Sec. 41-1410. Mortuaries and funeral homes. Page li3 of ly The minimum off-street parking requirements for mortuaries and funeral homes are as follows: one (1) space for each four (4) fixed seats, plus one (1) space for each thirty-five (35) square feet of floor area in any seating area without fixed seats, plus one (1) space for each business vehicle. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1411. Churches, chapels and religious meeting halls. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for churches, chapels and religious meeting halls are as follows: one (1) space for each three (3) fixed seats, plus one (1) space for each thirty-five (35) square feet of floor area in seating areas without fixed seats. (b) For purposes of this section, "seating areas" shall include congregation seating, prayer and cry rooms, pastor and choir areas, and similar areas. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1412. Child care facilities. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for child care facilities are as follows: one (1) space for each eight (8) individuals, plus one (1) space for each supervisor or teacher. (b) Child care facilities providing care or instruction to ten (10) or more individuals at any one (1) time shall also provide a passenger loading/unloading zone. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90; Ord. No. NS-2176, § 6, 9-21-92; Ord. No. NS-2340, § 33, 12- 15-97; Ord. No. NS-2446, § 24, 9-18-00) Sec. 41-1412.5. Adult day care facilities. (a) Adult day care facilities shall be parked at the rate of one (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of activity or assembly area, plus one (1) space for each supervisor or teacher. (b) Whenever the parking requirement for an adult day care facility, as an ancillary use, exceeds the parking requirement for the primary use, the adult day care facility shall be parked at the rate of one (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of activity or assembly area, plus one (1) space for each supervisor or teacher. (c) Adult day care facilities providing care or instruction to ten (10) or more adults at any one (1) time shall also provide a passenger loading/unloading zone. 31~#~ 1 ,_«._.~n'~-------'---------'------~__•._---~--aiv....i..,.u~,..-...;.,i~nici~ic.t~~i~n~-~+a„-„-,lam+o~4'-f,_~., Qisi~nn~ ARTICLE ~'V. OFF-STREET PAKKING ,Page 1 y of 1 y (Ord. No. NS-2446, § 25, 9-18-00) Sec. 41-1413. Public utility substations and communication facilities. The minimum off-street parking requirements for public utility substations and communication facilities are as follows: one (1) combination parking space and loading/unloading zone. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Sec. 41-1414. Rectories, prioriies, convents and other residential accessory church uses. The minimum off-street parking requirements for rectories, priories, convents and other residential accessory church uses are as follows: one (1) garage space per bedroom, plus spaces for guest parking equal to twenty-five (25) percent of the total required for nonguest parking. (Ord. No. NS-2176, § 7, 9-21-92) Secs. 41-1415--41-1419. Reserved. Sec. 41-1420. Unspecified uses. (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for any use conducted in a building which cannot reasonably be considered aswithin the scope of any other section of this article setting minimum parking space requirements are as follows: five (5) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. (b) The minimum off-street parking requirements for any use conducted outside of a building which cannot reasonably be considered as within the scope of any other section of this article shall be determined by the planning director. Such determination may be appealed to the planning commission and the city council. (Ord. No. NS-2091, § 1, 11-19-90) Secs. 41-1421--41-1499. Reserved. 47 of 8 httn://librarv6.municode.coin/~ateway.dlUcl~~r~~ 15/3154/3169?ftemplates$fn=do... 8/5/2005 Appendix B Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking Methodology 31~~63 !~ ~~ '_ ~ ~ ULIs study provides an in-depth analysis and a predictive methodology. f One of the most important elements of mixed use/multi-use develobment. 3140-~4 t w ;cs t SHARED PARKING DEMAND FOR SELECTED LAND USES Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. In I982-1983, ULI, with special funding from many sources, engaged Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. to un- dertake astudy of the shared parking phenomenon. This ar- ticle summarizes the objectives, findings, and recommenda- tions of the study. A published report and a computer pro- gram will be available later this fall. Richard J. Hocking, vice president, Neil S. Kenig, vice president, and John R. Wroble, associate, were project coordinators for Barton- Aschman, which is headquartered in Evanston, Illinois, Editor hared parking is defined as parking space that can be used to serve two or more individual land uses without conflict or encroachment. The shared parking phenomenon has long been ob- served in central business districts, suburban com- munities, and other areas where land uses are combined. It is the result of two conditions: • Variations in the peak accumulation of parked ve- hicles due to time differences in the activity pat- terns of adjacent or nearby land uses (by hour, by day, by season). For example, a parking facility can be used by office. employees during the day and serve patrons of an adjacent theater at night. • Relationships among land use activities that result in people being attracted to two or more land uses on a single auto trip to a given area or develop- ment. While the existence of shared parking is recog- nized by developers and public officials, typical zon- ing codes do not explicitly provide for it. Instead, most zoning codes are expressed in terms of peak parking indices or ratios for major types of individu- al land uses. While the peak ratios reflect the differ- ences in parking demand generated by separate land uses and under certain conditions, they do not re- flect the fact that total or combined peak parking de- mand can be significantly less than the sum of the individual peak demand values. ^~~~~r~~~~~~~^ ~~~~~~~~~~~ri~^ ~r~n~~~~~~~~~^ ~~~~~~~~~~a~~~ ........... ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~FIl ^~~~a~~~~i~~~^ ~I 1! ~ ;; ~:::::::: ~:: .... ^.. s ......:::"^.. ~~i1 ~~~~~~•a~ii~~^ ~i~a~i~i~~~~~ir~l fly •,~`••~i:'•~i:~ ~~~i i~~ti~rr~i~~~r ~, ~ .~ ~~^ ~ ~• Mixed-use developments, such as Water Tower Place in Chicago, highlight the need to plan for shared parking. Study Objective Even though the shared parking phenomenon commonly occurs in a number of specific cases, little literature is available that formally documents the circumstances of shared parking or provides guide- lines for quantifying the extent of shared parking. There is no accepted method for predicting and quantifying shared parking opportunities under a wide range of possible conditions. Thus, research ob- jectives were to: • • identify the primary independent variables affect- ing parking demand in shared parking situations (i.e., for developments involving two or more land uses); • identify the relative effects and universality of those variables; and • develop a standard methodology for analyzing shared parking. 31~,-~5 2 °ientemh,•r ~3/f11~i~iLr71 f1.IPJTf~ P.:, ,`~f :..~FA~ ti . . ~ ,~Cjt-, }~ - ~` A ' ',F §„ > '" ~5 ~; ~ ` 1yn r ,~1Y 't-; _~ ,; - r ;:!"r ~ .,. i j- .~~ :.~ ~ ~•" - ..aura ,. • °, ~ ..:. Ir II i ~~ 11 ~ .i•„ I 11 I "~~ u' '-•,--fir. 1111 111 ~~i l '' ~ ~ ~.y fil l' I IIIIU~i111i 1 ~~tl~ ~ . ~I .. ~ III 1 J ..._. __.:~., I I~ iiiuii 1•. iuil. ~IIIiOi nl ...' ~ >n= , . ' ~ Ili ll ~ ~ ^ ~i ~ Ilu ' ~ 1 , . " ~~~. l 'rr III , ~w'I III7 I i u ~ T 1 ..11 •111111.,.,, aee9tl,;~ :_ ~! +••~ III I 1 VIIU III ' ~~ ~ II .,,,.....1111.,' "t.; ~ . ••• J k ~ nil i ~ ~"•_ ~ I _ _ ~ .. - - ti 1 ~R'~ . 4 ~ ,,.,, .• ~ I ~ ~ ~ : ~_ _ _ .I1 ~~': 1~... Procedure t'arking deutand can be observed at existing mixed-use de~•elopments, if such projects have their own parking facilities, it is possible to count the ac- cumulation of parked vehicles and determine the peak parking demand. The latter would represent an aggregate value for all of the land uses in the de- velopntent. The issue for research, however, was how this aggregate value c(nnpnred to the sum oE• the peak parkin},r demand krr the individual land uses. '!•hat is, in Order to study shared parkin;;, it ~r;ts nec- essarv to stud~•, independently, the parking space de- mand characteristics of each component of a mixed- use development and to estimate the effects on de- nuuul clue to the combination of these uses. 'I•hus, the first step was ,to studti• the parking space demand generated bl• sil,=nificant indi~•idual land uses in situations ~~•here unit peak parking demand w<)uld be ill ItlaXIIllUnt le~•els. •I•}'pical freestanding subur- bnn laud uses produce -naximum unit parking de- ntnnd prinuu-il~• because sufficient p~u-king space is a~~ailahle and transit use is insignificant. By Eirst identifying parking demand at SUCK "unconsn•auted" freestanding single land uses, other effects such as transit use and captive market relationships amid be Isol~txe(l. Analysis "[•he results of• the first step of the analysis estab- lished parking space demand characteristics at six single land uses, defined in terms of peak unit de- mand, hourly accumulation, and seasonal variation. Peak trait demands (see Figure 1) were developed on the basis of occupied land use units and negligible - - Figure 1 .. Representative Peak Parking • Demand Factors Land Use Unit !.;., }: "' `". Weekday ; ., Saturday r, Office Parking spaces per l,QO0 sy.ft. GLA 3 00 (1.50 ~:; Retail (< 400,000 sq.ft.) Parking spaces per L,,(1Q0 sy.ft. GLA 3.50 ' 4•.00 '' ~' Retail (> 600,000 sq.ft.) Parking spaces pet 1 O00 sq ft GLA` 3 80 5.00 Restaurant Parking spaces pet 1 p00 sy ft CIA'.' •' '" 2O 00 ~~'+ ~ 20.OO,~~,G~~T`~' C.:inema Parking spaces pet seat ~.°, 0 25 - t~ 0:30~~ ~`~~~i(n Residential Parking spaces per clvv~elhng itntt7 {t,`1i00 .' ~•;~ 1`~, "1 X00 ~,~~~ Hotel `'' , i . ~ x r~ ~~, ~ i ra ~~~,~,r#'~+` I~ 1 i' %~pl ~ z .~ -tip E' a a~ ~I- az•i ~ ~'~-~+) ~5~ Guest Room Parking spaces per room ,~ ~~,; r +~~ ryrz, Y11 25 ,~a. t ~,~ , ~ RestaurantlLounge Parking spaces per 1 000 s ft CLA ~,~~~ ~ ~lE) OO~~t~r~{ r, ~1'~~¢ lU•UQ~` F j y 1 k+ ~r1J y, 4- ~ '~~6 G I , ~r~i Srr-st dy ~ ~ St k~•^,">i~ ,s 5 s Ga rp ~~, !~ ~ ,~ s5~~ ~,vir r`§' i ConE•erence Rooms Parkin s aces et sett P ~`, ~ ,,+ I .~ d 50 - ~r ~~r 0.50 ;n' uP P P e ~ * . ,.S.Ik~'~2`G~r. ~ 4. 3(r Se ~ ~+. ' ~s>? -~ ~ ~.,~,r'~ 9y Y~~~ r,Jt Convention Area Parkin s aces et 1 00 s 1t G `A!" ~~30 ~ r '`~hw~'y ~ <~~~3Q.00 '~`t+4 g P P ~ ~~~ ti ~ w~..r~.~.a .~~~4 ~. ~~i a ~(~ ~~,'> ~-~ ,~~1 K r ~ Y~~~ ~,: a ?~ . -es ~ "~ a~.•y~~`a a~lrt -r ~ .a'~ + F to ~ { ,d"gid' ••~y~r rc j~ Per one auto owned per dwelling unit. ~ ~~ F ^~. , ~~ G +t9 ~, ~, ~ '-'t~actorecl a to 10(l ercent auto use from the H() e~cettt taw us~,,~.tiuer y,~,,~~ ,. ,~},4~ r f~~~.~ ~, ~„~~ 3 '* y ~` t. , k'" P p p car v S c4 ^r #t 1.r.: 1 cy~ s+k$~' ~~ ~J ~'Usecl by nonguests; the given rates, thus, are upper bounds4ryhttitreiiYer1 yely~raeSli~, `{~~~9~r4t~~ #~{~U~K~~~..,r,€.~. J •,t~.a?YL4 s-u~'t'~~ti9 u,~ rn h~~T~~i ~ ;Y•$` '~ ~f~, 3"'is.C~SCs., a`'r. :r:~~r^~r. ~,... $ i,t, .--r. a - _ i ~( i • ~ ,~ G ,' c . r n y~,i k1 (~1 a ~ 31~~6 ' ' ) i ~Septetnber ~3 3 , .; _ ., ,., Figure 2 ; : , , Hourly Parlung Accumulation Curves ~ t for'Iridiv><dual Larid-uses ''' ' ~ • ° ~ ~~ •~` t y t!". 1E0 Nt' I~(N . ' ,'.~ I .~r_,.:~ .,,l tl r. .. ::..Aar \ • ~l. p 'r • ~ ~ ~ ~ . • L ~ ~ ,~~, J ~~RETAIL ~ ~ ~ ~CINfNA ~ _ ~ O ~ OffIC! ~ ~ x'10 ~ ~ AfSTAURANT _ I 10 .., ! t ! ! +a n +z t z a ~ ! e T s ! +o NOON NOUA OF THE OAY WEEKDAY ,EE ,a \ RESIDENTIAL / ~ C • / I F !° , ~ ~CINENA • u ~ t i Y ~ ~ AFTAIL °° ~ ~ ~F~r~u~A~ ~ r ~_ o ~ ~~ ~ •. ~ ~ >m •' OFflCE ~ 10 °'. ! _ ._ . T e 0 .'+. 10 T 11,'' N+~ ~ + '„' a 7 ~.r r4 6 ~" ! ' 7 '' ! ~~ ! ' 1E" - "~MOUfl OF TN! DAY' . -~ aATUflDAY ~': , , 31~r~7 '/ -__ =, , ;t .: , ~; ~, ~......~ .....r,.... Shared parking may occur in suburban developments if walking distances are not far and Land uses are Functionally related. transit use, thus representing the maximum parking accumulation occurring on a given day. Hourly ac- cumulation curves (developed from hourly counts at freestanding developments) for each individual I~-nd use (see Figure 2) indicate the variation in parking accumulation throughottt a given day. Seasonal vari- ation in parking demand at each land use (see Figure 3) was developed from management data supplied by developers and in-house historical data. The peak parking demands calculated from the parking de- mand factors in Figure 1 correspond to 100 percent of peak parking accumulation for each land use indi- cated on the hourly curves in Figure 2 and the monthly data in Figure 3. By combining the results for single land uses with survey data for mixed-use developments, it was pos- sible to document the effects of shared parking on total parking space requirements. This vas shown in terms of the reduced number of parking spaces needed to serve peak activity periods. The survey data also disclosed the potential for multiple "levels of reduction" in parking space based on the different impacts of time and inter-land use ,+ o~._.~~-.1___ moo! rmr~nrn n nrrm ~~~ ~. 6 ~- - ~~y'_ TY. • A' J~• - _ 1. :. n~ 4 a/lil~t~ ~~ - 0~~:%3`-` M1- _ y i_- ~' 7~ -- i 1 y lf~ ~27'iE ~~I` . .1 ,ni.. ... j. #' relationships. Depending on the particular land uses I involved and other site-specific characteristics, park- ing space reductions resulted from one or more of the effects of (1) hourly, daily, and seasonal offsets in parking accumulation patterns of individual land uses and (2) relationships among land use activities that resulted in people using more than one land use on a single auto trip, i.e., captive market effects. The captive market effect on parking demand at a partic- ular mixed-use development was dependent upon specific market conditions. The range of possible market conditions was reflected in the data obtained from survey questionnaires. Aggregate results of em- ployee surveys indicated that the percentage of all employees who were also patrons at a particular de- velopment ranged from 0 to 85 percent. However, on the average, there was a significant increase in employee patrons in central business district (CBD) developments relative to non-CBD developments and in combined-use developments relative to single- use developments. These results are summarized in Figure 4. Using the single-use analysis results, Figure 5, for example, illustrates the impact of time offsets in parking demand when 400,000 square feet (GLA oc- ~ cupied) of office space and 1.2 mtllion square feet (GLA occupied) of retail space are combined. On weekdays, retail parking demand is lower than Satur- day, but competes with office parking demand. The opportunity for shared parking results from having to provide the peak weekend retail parking demand for the development as a whole and when the office parking demand is at its lowest. In order to demonstrate the potential magnitude of shared parking effects, the parking demand find- ings for individual land uses were used to estimate demand for mixed-use developments. These results were compared to the actual peak parking accumula- tion counts to identify the difference. This test in- volved three steps as follows: • Compute gross peak parking demand. • Compute shared parking demand. • Compare results to actual parking demand. i ~k,~ a~,~j~,Y~~~ ,...~ ,, .~xF ,.. Figure 4 Captive Market Effects-Percent of :~:~. Employees Who Are Also Patrons In , . Same Or Nearby Development ' - =CBD ~ Range Non-CBD Range ~?=. Site ..Site Single-Use 29% 0-76% 19% 0-78% Sites Mixed-Use 61 22-85 28 0-83 Sites All Sites 43 0-85 24 0-83 Figure 5 Office/Retail Parking Accumulations (400,000 sq. ft. office and 1,200,000.. sq. ft. retail) r' twoo TOTAL F~DD o ~~er~n i~ "~~ 3 ~' t soon / . a ~ s ~t~ s ~ sooo / ~~ .. OffICE - IDDO / '. .:~ . ~• i' ~; ~ ~ ,, , ; S: d D ,. -•7 8 ~ ., iD 11 .~; 12 1 I 3 ~ --:6 6 7 8 0 .-/~~D~ ~71 X17 F;'t NOON ~ '~ ( ~ '" 4 I r ~:~,, fjFy~~ ="(~. w~ ~> i TIME OF DAY WEEKDAY ~i ~ t `- I ~ v `- ~ t^ trtL ~'. _f, ~~ ~~ ~ t 41F1 L I [~/ ' c+ ~~~' 1I ~„~ai '6000 T; , ,- .~ ., ~ .. ., ~. ~'~jl ~ /~ gy.~' X14 r~ i ~ 4000.. ,.w ~~~~~h .¢LSfti~rZC~1C~!~~~R14: ~~ ,_ 31~~8 0°~' ' ~D September 83 5 Figure 6 summarizes the results of the test. An im- portant qualification to the results is that the ob- served parking count (Column 4) does not necessarily represent a "design value" for the devel- opment. It is not known if each project was operat- ing at maximum levels of trip generation or if business volumes were significantly lower for the project due to the slow economy or other factors. Specifically, it is known that those projects exhibiting an unusually low actual accumulation were being af- fected by site factors. Projects 10, 11, 13, 1G, and 17 were experiencing lower occupancy at hotel compo- nents. This is signtficant since the values in Column 3 were computed assuming 100 percent occupancy. Further, same projects were surveyed assuming that all parking demand was beitlg served by oti-site facil- ities. Projects 13 and 15, however, tnay reflect a dif- ferent situation, since there is a substantial amount of "other" parking space available. For Project 13, it is known that such parking is used significantly by employees. Findings With the above qualifications in mind, Figure G in- dicates: • The parking demand estimated by adding the indi- vidual peaks produced results that were consis- tently high. • Estimating shared parking demand using time dif- ferentials will, if properly constructed, be more re- liable than estimating gross parking demand. • When conservative values are used for peak park- ing and hourly factors, estimated shared parking demand will be higher than actual parking ac- cumulation. In addition, there often times are other relationships, such as captive market effects, which lower aggregate parking demand. Figu re 6 Results"'of Test Cases 1 2 g 4 5 6 7 Percent of Percent Estimated Estimated Overestimation Savings Single-Use Typical Shared Observed Shared2 Gross Gross Zoning Pazking Actual Gross Parking Peak Peak Codet Peak Peak Peak Peak to Accumulation Requirement Accumulation Accumulation to to Shared Mixed-Use Project Type (spaces) (spaces) (spaces) (spaces) Actual Actual Peak 1. Office/Retail 5,749 5.858 5,229 5,570 3%n -6% 9% 2. Office/Retail 2,936 3,744 2,788 2,352 25 19 6 3. Office/Retail 772 900 617 G33 22 - 3 25 4. Office/Retail 2,814 3,048 2,291 2,592 9 - 12 21 5. Office/Retail 162 196 154 154 5 0 5 6. Office/Entertainment 1,458 1,879 1,32G 1,163 25 14 11 7. Office/Entertainment 812 1,O1G 714 464 75 54 21 8. Office/Entertainment 1,724 2,112 1,501 614 181 144 37 9. Office/Hotel 1,145 1,399 1,006 882 30 14 16 10. Uffice/Hotell Entertainment 1,627 1,933 1,323 725 124 82 42 11. Office/Hotell Entertainment 1,236 1,452 990 525 135 89 46 12. Office/Hotel/ Entertainment 784 862 659 809 -3 -19 - 13. Office/Retail/H ote U Entertainment 8,316. 9,610 4,242 2,287 264 85 179 14. Office/Retail/ Entertainment 869 1,094 754 GDO 45 26 19 15. Office/Retail/ Entertainment 5,099 5,157 3,755 2,869 78 31 47 16. Office/Hotell Entertainment 2,588 3,188 2,183 1,498 73 46 27 17. Office/Hotel 1,125 1,34G 743 594 89 25 64 t~>For this calculation, the following code standards were used: Ot~fice = 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GL A; retail = 4.0 or 5.U spaces per 1,000 feet of GLA (function of size); restaurant = 20 .0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GL A; reside ntial = 1.0 spaces per dwelling unit; hotel = 1.0 spaces per room, with conference rooms at 0.5 spaces per seat. ~2>Using results from Colum n 3. 6 September 83/~ - ~ 31~~9 Recommended Shared Parking Method Based upon survey fiuding~s, a ntethodolog~• ryas developed to determine parkin} denrtnd antler mixed-use development conditions. 'I~his ntethodol- ugy is universal in its application and Ilcxil,lc cnongh to incorporate adjusunent factors as necessary ut suit specific policies, programs, and market conditions. [t involves four basic steps that may be applied, with appropriate background information, to an existing ur proposed project. figure i illusu-ates the organi- zation and flow of work. 'I•he Four basic steps are: Step 1: luilinl !'rnjrr•/ /ir~~iru~-involves the siring anti E'unctional relationship of project land uses based upon market rose;u'ch, site e•onstraints, etc. Step 2: Pr~rrk Pnrkirrti FruYur,Irlju.elrrrrrrl,e-involves the selection of appropriate peak parking accumulation factors fin• each land use, ;utd the adjust-nent of each factor to reflect site-specific Factors sorb a:; transit use and captive markets. Step 3: IlnrrrlY ,-I r•r•ruurr/rrlinrr ;Irrn/t'si.~-involves the. hourh•, daily, and seasonal estimation of parking ac- cumulation fur each comlx,ttent land use. Step 4: Slrru•rvl Prn•kirrti li.~lirrrrrlinrr-involves the hourly, daily, and seasonal estimation of parking ac•- cunndation for the entire project. '[~he ntethocl tau use factors ;utd relationships de- veloped h~• this research or input Croat ether anal~- ses. 'l•he latter could iurlude data to modify unit parking Parlors or other charac•teristic•s ;uul nt;u•ket analtses.'t'he method is designed to be sequential. but it can be used in an iterative Fashion to test the impact oE' alternative deyelopntent. pl;uts, assump- tions, or policies. ,Figure 7 - `, ,Shared Parking' Method ' ti::. II:- I l ~ :~ '. .~0 .~ STYP 1 .~ ,rt~wl w, w n k i~ n ytY ~~;~ ® - ~' - 4 'e i V.,r ~~p ~ ,'srcra mi a ~ ~ ~ ~ n.` ~} o~ii ~ YLTwp Ls ' y ~~'~''~'~.c r ,t~,::~'~'Mw..t:....., . Implementing Shared Parking A number of factors must Ix: cunside:red in ostler to insure efficient design, operation, and ntnnagr- ment of'shared parking facilities.'1'l,e rescare•h also cx;uuincd these factors in detail and identified guidelines for implementing shared parking as fol- lows: • Each parking space should be usable I»• all parkers, i.e., no resu•ir.ticnts. • The facility t~'ill have significant inbotutcl anti uttt- I>ennul u~aftic flow at Otte or more pct•ic><Is of the clay, 'Therefore, the design of the are•ess and cir- culation system must acconunodate hi-directional nutvement trithuut siguiticant cuntlica..~lso, the circulation concept should he easy to usr anti un- derstand in order to minimise couFusion ;tad inef- ficient driving maneuvers. • -l~he facility would tend to operate `?-1 hours, seven clays per tc•eek. 'T'hus, safe d;ty anti night operation wcntld be a significant characteristie•. • Because of the multiple land uses that ~eould he served, involving a Variety oP types of parkers (e.g., business, daily yet;5us infrequent, shoppers, visi- tors, recreational. etc.), the facility t~ ill he more sensitive w effective signing, markings, and other communication systems. • "Thought needs to he given to enforrentent of parking for on-site Visits, since the fae•ility will be more sensitive to encroachment (i.e., less t~ pic•ally Vacant space). • A strategy for the use of the facilin• needs to he de- veloped in order to guide parkers to the most op- timum space. •f~he strategy ~~'ould consider: a. Achieving nutxinntm separation of those parkers who tend to compete for space, i.e.. being present at the same time (e.g.. shoppers and cinema patrons attending matinees). b. Achieving minimum walking distance to those land uses having captive market relationships. c. Achieving minimum separation of those parkers trot competintT for space. • The data collected in the survey was suE'ficiently consistent to indicate that a quantitative basis for estimating shared parking= demand does exist. Since the shared parking methodology estimates potential parking requirements for specific mixed- use or multiuse developments, it can be used as evidence for a zoning procedure and as a develop- ment design tool Use in zoning procedures is sig- nificant because of the parking standards currently used in most tn~ban areas. fn many cases, the shared parking anal~•sis will indicate lower parking requirements. ^ ~fi ] ~ /September 53 31~~,~0 Appendix C Shared Parking Printouts 31~,~ 1 Weekday 31~A~ 2 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =JANUARY DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBU TION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 65% 84% 84% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 181 148 22 351 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKI NG DEMAND: NUMBE R OF SPAC ES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 14 3 - 17 8:00 AM 33 7 1 41 9:00 AM 76 15 2 93 10:00 AM 123 30 4 157 11:00 AM 157 44 7 208 12:00 NOON 176 74 11 261 1:00 PM 181 104 15 300 2:00 PM 176 89 13 278 3:00 PM 172 89 13 274 4:00 PM 157 74 11 242 5:00 PM 143 104 15 262 6:00 PM 148 133 20 301 7:00 PM 161 148 22 331 X 8:00 PM 157 148 22 327 9:00 PM 110 148 22 280 10:00 PM 58 133 20 211 11:00 PM 24k' 104 15 143 12:00 MID - 74 11 85 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 331 31~,~3 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR = FEBRUARY DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 65% 84% 84% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 181 148 22 351 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKING DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 14 3 - 17 8:00 AM 33 7 1 41 9:00 AM 76 15 2 93 10:00 AM 123 30 4 157 11:00 AM 157 44 7 208 12:00 NOON 176 74 11 261 1:00 PM 181 104 15 300 2:00 PM 176 89 13 278 3:00 PM 172 89 13 274 4:00 PM 157 74 11 242 5:00 PM 143 104 15 262 6:00 PM 148 133 20 301 7:00 PM 161 148 22 331 X 8:00 PM 157 148 22 327 9:00 PM 110 148 22 280 10:00 PM 58 133 20 211 11:00 PM 24 104 15 143 12:00 MID - 74 11 85 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 331 .S "I~~ 4 _ PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =MARCH DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 70% 94% 94% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 195 165 24 384 8:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKING DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 16 3 - 19 8:00 AM 35 8 1 44 9:00 AM 82 17 2 101 10:00 AM 133 33 5 171 11:00 AM 170 50 7 227 12:00 NOON 189 83 12 284 1:00 PM 195 116 17 328 2:00 PM 189 99 14 302 3:00 PM 185 99 14 298 4:00 PM 170 83 12 265 5:00 PM 154 116 17 287 6:00 PM 160 149 22 331 7:00 PM 174 165 24 363 X 8:00 PM 170 165 24 359 9:00 PM 119 165 24 308 10:00 PM 62 149 22 233 11:00 PM 25 116 17 158 12:00 MID - 83 12 95 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 363 31~r~5 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plan 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =APRIL DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 70% 93% 93% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 195 164 24 .383 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKING DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 16 3 - 19 8:00 AM 35 8 1 44 9:00 AM 82 16 2 100 10:00 AM 133 33 5 171 11:00 AM 170 49 7 226 12:00 NOON 189 82 12 283 1:00 PM 195 115 17 327 2:00 PM 189 98 14 301 3:00 PM 185 98 14 297 4:00 PM 170 82 12 264 5:00 PM' 154 115 17 286 6:00 PM 160 148 22 330 7:00 PM 174 164 24 362 X 8:00 PM 170 164 24 358 9:00 PM 119 164 24 307 10:00 PM 62 148 22 232 11:00 PM 25 115 17 157 12:00 MID - 82 12 94 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 362 _ PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 ~ MONTH OF THE YEAR =MAY DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBU TION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 70% 97% 97% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 195 171 25 391 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKI NG DEMAN D: NUMBE R OF SPAC ES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 16 3 1 20 8:00 AM 35 9 1 45 9:00 AM 82 17 3 102 10:00 AM 133 34 5 172 11:00 AM 170 51 8 229 12:00 NOON 189 86 13 288 1:00 PM 195 120 18 333 2:00 PM 189 103 15 307 3:00 PM 185 103 15 303 4:00 PM 170 86 13 269 5:00 PM 154 120 18 292 6:00 PM 160 154 23 337 7:00 PM 174 171 25 370 X 8:00 PM 170 171 25 366 9:00 PM 119 171 25 315 10:00 PM 62 154 23 239 11:00 PM 25 120 18 163 12:00 MID - 86 13 99 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 370 31~~~7 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza - 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =JUNE DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 96% 96% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 209 169 25 403 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PIVI 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKI NG DEMA ND: NUMBER OF SPAC ES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 17 3 1 21 8:00 AM 38 8 1 47 9:00 AM 88 17 3 108 10:00 AM 142 34 5 181 11:00 AM 182 51 8 241 , 12:00 NOON 203 85 13 301 1:00 PM 209 118 18 345 2:00 PM 203 101 15 319 3:00 PM 199 101 15 315 4:00 PM 182 85 13 280 5:00 PM 165 118 18 301 6:00 PM 171 152 23 346 7:00 PM 186 169 25 380 X 8:00 PM 182 169 25 376 9:00 PM 127 169 25 321 10:00 PM 67 152 23 242 11:00 PM 27 118 18 163 12:00 MID - 85 13 98 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 380 3 I~~~ ~ _~ _ PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plazs 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 l MONTH OF THE YEAR =JULY _ DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 98% 98% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 209 172 25 406 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKI NG DEMAN D: NUMBE R OF SPAC ES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 17 3 1 21 8:00 AM 38 9 1 48 9:00 AM 88 17 3 108 10:00 AM 142 34 5 181 11:00 AM 182 52 8 242 12:00 NOON 203 86 13 302 1:00 PM 209 120 18 347 2:00 PM 203 103 15 321 3:00 PM 199 103 15 317 4:00 PM 182 86 13 281 5:00 PM 165 120 18 303- 6:00 PM 171 155 23 349 7:00 PM 186 172 25 383 X 8:00 PM 182 172 25 379 9:00 PM 127 172 25 324 10:00 PM 67 155 23 245 11:00 PM 27 120 18 165 12:00 MID - 86 13 99 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 383 31~A~9 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza 4/6!2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =AUGUST DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 209 176 - 26 411 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKI NG DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 17 4 1 22 8:00 AM 38 9 1 48 9:00 AM 88 18 3 109 10:00 AM 142 35 5 182 11:00 AM 182 53 8 243 12:00 NOON 203 88 13 304 1:00 PM 209 123 18 350 2:00 PM 203 106 16 325 3:00 PM 199 106 16 321 4:00 PM 182 88 13 283 5:00 PM 165 123 18 306 6:00 PM 171 158 23 352 7:00 PM 186 176 26 388 X 8:00 PM 182 176 26 384 9:00 PM 127 176 26 329 10:00 PM 67 158 23 248 11:00 PM 27 123 18 168 12:00 MID - 88 13 101 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 388 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaz: 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =SEPTEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 92% 92% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 209 162 24 395 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 17 3 - 20 8:00 AM 38 8 1 47 9:00 AM 88 16 2 106 10:00 AM 142 32 5 179 11:00 AM 182 49 7 238 12:00 NOON 203 81 12 296 1:00 PM 209 113 17 339 2:00 PM 203 97 14 314 3:00 PM 199 97 14 310 4:00 PM 182 81 12 275 5:00 PM 165 113 17 295 6:00 PM 171 146 22 339 7:00 PM 186 162 24 372 X 8:00 PM 182 162 24 368 9:00 PM 127 162 24 313 10:00 PM 67 146 22 235 11:00 PM 27 113 17 157 12:00 MID - 81 12 93 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 372 31~r>$1 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =OCTOBER DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 95% 95% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 209 167 25 401 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKING DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 17 3 1 21 8:00 AM 38 8 1 47 9:00 AM 88 17 3 108 10:00 AM 142 33 5 180 11:00 AM 182 50 8 240 12:00 NOON 203 84 13 300 1:00 PM 209 117 18 344 2:00 PM 203 100 15 318 3:00 PM 199 100 15 314 4:00 PM 182 84 13 279 5:00 PM 165 117 18 300 6:00 PM 171 150 23 344 7:00 PM 186 167 25 378 X 8:00 PM 182 167 25 374 9:00 PM 127 167 25 319 10:00 PM 67 150 23 240 11:00 PM 27 117 18 162 12:00 MID - 84 13 97 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 378 .S "I~t~ L 1 __~ PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plan 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =NOVEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY J PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 80% 92% 92% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 223 162 24 409 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50°l0 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKI NG DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPAC ES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 18 3 - 21 8:00 AM 40 8 1 49 9:00 AM 94 16 2 112 10:00 AM 152 32 5 189 11:00 AM 194 49 7 250 12:00 NOON 216 81 12 309 1:00 PM 223 113 17 353 2:00 PM 216 97 14 327 3:00 PM 212 97 14 323 4:00 PM 194 81 12 287 5:00 PM 176 113 17 306 6:00 PM 183 146 22 351 7:00 PM 198 162 24 384 X 8:00 PM 194 162 24 380 9:00 PM 136 162 24 322 10:00 PM 71 146 22 239 11:00 PM 29 113 17 159 12:00 MID - 81 12 93 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 384 31~f~3 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =DECEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKDAY PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 279 176 26 481 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 100% 96% 96% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 279 169 25 473 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 5% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 50% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 70% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 60% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 60% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 61 % 100% 100% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 50% DAILY PARKING DEMAN D: NUMBE R OF SPACES TIME OF THE DAY Retail Restaurant Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - 7:00 AM 22 3 1 26 8:00 AM 50 8 1 59 9:00 AM 117 17 3 137 10:00 AM 190 34 5 229 11:00 AM 243 51 8 .302 12:00 NOON 271 85 13 369 1:00 PM 279 118 18 415 2:00 PM 271 101 15 387 3:00 PM 265 101 15 381 4:00 PM 243 85 13 341 5:00 PM 220 118 18 356 6:00 PM 229 152 23 404 7:00 PM 248 169 25 442 X 8:00 PM 243 169 25 437 9:00 PM 170 169 25 364 10:00 PM 89 152 23 264 11:00 PM 36 118 18 172 12:00 MID - 85 13 98 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 442 Weekend 31~~ 5 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaz 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =JANUARY DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustment: ANALYST = R. KAHN. DAILY PARKING DISTRIBU TION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 65% 84% 84% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 190 148 22 360 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 6 3 - 9 8:00 AM 19 4 1 24 9:00 AM 57 9 1 67 10:00 AM 86 12 2 100 11:00 AM 139 15 2 156 12:00 NOON 162 44 7 213 1:00 PM 181 67 10 258 2:00 PM 190 67 10 267 3:00 PM 190 67 10 267 4:00 PM 171 67 10 248 5:00 PM 143 89 13 245 6:00 PM 124 133 20 277 X 7:00 PM 114 141 21 276 8:00 PM 105 148 22 275 9:00 PM 76 148 22 246 10:00 PM 72 141 21 234 11:00 PM 25 126 19 170 12:00 MID - 104 15 119 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 277 31~~6 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaz 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =FEBRUARY DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustment: ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBU TION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 65% 84% . 84% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 190 148 22 360 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 6 3 - 9 8:00 AM 19 4 1 24 9:00 AM 57 9 1 67 10:00 AM 86 12 2 100 1.1:00 AM 139 15 2 156 12:00 NOON 162 44 7 213 1:00 PM 181 67 10 258 2:00 PM 190 67 10 267 3:00 PM 190 67 10 267 4:00 PM 171 67 10 248 5:00 PM 143 89 13 245 6:00 PM 124 133 20 277 X 7:00 PM 114 141 21 276 8:00 PM 105 148 22 275 9:00 PM 76 148 22 246 10:00 PM 72 141 21 234 11:00 PM 25 126 19 170 12:00 MID - 104 15 119 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 277 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaz 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =MARCH DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustment; ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBU TION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 70% 94% 94% ADJ.-PEAK PARKING 205 165 24 394 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail. t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 6 3 - 9 8:00 AM 21 5 1 27 9:00 AM 62 10 1 73 10:00 AM 92 13 2 107 11:00 AM 150 17 2 169 12:00 NOON 174 50 7 231 1:00 PM 195 74 11 280 2:00 PM 205 74 11 290 3:00 PM 205 74 11 290 4:00 PM 185 74 11 270 5:00 PM 154 99 14 267 6:00 PM 133 149 22 304 X 7:00 PM 123 157 23 303 8:00 PM 113 165 24 302 9:00 PM 82 165 24 271 10:00 PM 78 157 23 258 11:00 PM 27 140 20 187 12:00 MID - 116 17 133 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 304 31~,-~8 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Play 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =APRIL DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustment: ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBU TION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 70% 93% 93% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 205 164 24 393 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 6 3 - 9 8:00 AM 21 5 1 27 9:00 AM 62 10 1 73 10:00 AM 92 13 2 107 11:00 AM 150 16 2 168 12:00 NOON 174 49 7 230 1:00 PM 195 74 11 280 2:00 PM 205 74 11 290 3:00 PM 205 74 11 290 4:00 PM 185 74 11 270 5:00 PM 154 98 14 266 6:00 PM 133 148 22 303 X 7:00 PM 123 156 23 302 8:00 PM 113 164 24 301 9:00 PM 82 164 24 270 10:00 PM 78 156 23 257 11:00 PM 27 139 20 186 12:00 MID - 115 17 132 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 303 ~~:~y _~ PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaza 4/6/2006 _~ PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 J MONTH OF THE YEAR =MAY DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIB UTION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 70% 97% 97% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 205 171 25 401 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKI NG DEMAN D: NUMBE R OF SPAC ES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 6 3 1 10 8:00 AM 21 5 1 27 9:00 AM 62 10 2 74 10:00 AM 92 14 2 108 11:00 AM 150 17 3 170 12:00 NOON 174 51 8 233 1:00 PM 195 77 11 283 2:00 PM 205 77 11 293 3:00 PM 205 77 11 293 4:00 PM 185 77 11 273 5:00 PM 154 103 15 272 6:00 PM 133 154 23 310 X 7:00 PM 123 162 24 309 8:00 PM 113 171 25 309 9:00 PM 82 171 25 278 10:00 PM 78 162 24 264 11:00 PM 27 145 21 193 12:00 MID - 120 18 138 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 310 31~~-~0 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaz 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =JUNE DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 96% 96% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 220 169 25 414 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - _ 7:00 AM 7 3 1 11 8:00 AM 22 5 1 28 9:00 AM 66 10 2 78 10:00 AM 99 14 2 115 11:00 AM 161 17 3 181 12:00 NOON 187 51 8 246 1:00 PM 209 76 11 296 2:00 PM 220 76 11 307 3:00 PM 220 76 11 307 4:00 PM 198 76 11 285 5:00 PM 165 101 15 281 6:00 PM 143 152 23 318 X 7:00 PM 132 161 24 317 8:00 PM 121 169 25 315 9:00 PM 88 169 25 282 10:00 PM 84 161 24 269 11:00 PM 29 144 21 194 12:00 MID - 118 18 136 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 318 3 77i6'a~ 7 _~ PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plan 4/6/2006 l PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =JULY DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 98% 98% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 220 172 25 417 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBE R OF SPAC ES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 7 3 1 11 8:00 AM 22 5 1 28 9:00 AM 66 10 2 78 10:00 AM 99 14 2 115 11:00 AM 161 17 3 181 12:00 NOON 187 52 8 247 1:00 PM 209 77 11 297 2:00 PM 220 77 11 308 3:00 PM 220 77 11 308 4:00 PM 198 77 11 286 5:00 PM 165 103 15 283 6:00 PM 143 155 23 321 X 7:00 PM 132 163 24 319 8:00 PM 121 172 25 318 9:00 PM 88 172 25 285 10:00 PM 84 163 24 271 11:00 PM 29 146 21 196 12:00 MID - 120 18 138 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 321 31~,~2 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaz 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =AUGUST DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustment ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBU TION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 220 176 26 422 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 7 4 1 12 8:00 AM ~ 22 5 1 28 9:00 AM 66 11 2 79 10:00 AM 99 14 2 115 11:00 AM 161 18 3 182 12:00 NOON 187 53 8 248 1:00 PM 209 79 12 300 2:00 PM 220 79 12 311 3:00 PM 220 79 12 311 4:00 PM 198 79 12 289. 5:00 PM 165 106 16 287 6:00 PM 143 158 23 324 X 7:00 PM 132 167 25 324 X 8:00 PM 121 176 26 323 9:00 PM 88 176 26 290 10:00 PM 84 167 25 276 11:00 PM 29 150 22 201 12:00 MID - 123 18 141 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 324 7~1~ l _ PROJECT NAME = BristoUSunflower Plaz 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =SEPTEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND 1 PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 92% 92% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 220 162 24 406 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 7 3 - 10 8:00 AM 22 5 1 28 9:00 AM 66 10 1 77 10:00 AM 99 13 2 114 11:00 AM 161 16 2 179 12:00 NOON 187 49 7 243 1:00 PM 209 73 11 293 2:00 PM 220 73 11 304 3:00 PM 220 73 11 304 4:00 PM 198 73 11 282 5:00 PM 165 97 14 276 6:00 PM 143 146 22 311 X 7:00 PM 132 154 23 309 8:00 PM 121 162 24 307 9:00 PM 88 162 24 274 10:00 PM 84 154 23 261 11:00 PM 29 138 20 187 12:00 MID - 113 17 130 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 311 31~~>~4 PROJECT NAME = BristoUSunflower Plaz 4/6!2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =OCTOBER DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 95% 95% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 220 167 25 412 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKING DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 7 3 1 11 8:00 AM 22 5 1 28 9:00 AM 66 10 2 78 10:00 AM 99 13 2 114 11:00 AM 161 17 3 181 12:00 NOON 187 50 8 245 1:00 PM 209 75 11 295 2:00 PM 220 75 11 306 3:00 PM 220 75 11 306 4:00 PM 198 75 11 284 5:00 PM 165 100 15 280 6:00 PM 143 150 23 316 X 7:00 PM 132 159 24 315 8:00 PM 121 167 25 313 9:00 PM 88 167 25 280 10:00 PM 84 159 24 267 11:00 PM 29 142 21 192 12:00 MID - 117 18 135 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 316 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Pla: 4/6/2006 I PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 I MONTH OF THE YEAR =NOVEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND 1 PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustment; ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBU TION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 80% 92% 92% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 234 162 24 420 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKIN G DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t -Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 7 3 - 10 8:00 AM 23 5 1 29 9:00 AM 70 10 1 81 10:00 AM 105 13 2 120 11:00 AM 171 16 2 189 12:00 NOON 199 49 7 255 1:00 PM 222 73 11 306 2:00 PM 234 73 11 318 3:00 PM 234 73 11 318 4:00 PM 211 73 11 295 5:00 PM 176 97 14 287 6:00 PM 152 146 22 320 X 7:00 PM 140 154 23 317 8:00 PM 129 162 24 315 9:00 PM 94 162 24 280 10:00 PM 89 154 23 266 11:00 PM 30 138 20 188 12:00 MID - 113 17 130 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 320 31~A~ 6 PROJECT NAME =Bristol/Sunflower Plaz; 4/6/2006 PROJECT NUMBER = 1737-05-01 MONTH OF THE YEAR =DECEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK =WEEKEND PARKING RATES =City of Santa Ana with ULI adjustments ANALYST = R. KAHN DAILY PARKING DISTRIBUTION Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL PEAK PARKING 293 176 26 495 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 100% 96% 96% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 293 169 25 487 6:00 AM 0% 0% 0% 7:00 AM 3% 2% 2% 8:00 AM 10% 3% 3% 9:00 AM 30% 6% 6% 10:00 AM 45% 8% 8% 11:00 AM 73% 10% 10% 12:00 NOON 85% 30% 30% 1:00 PM 95% 45% 45% 2:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 3:00 PM 100% 45% 45% 4:00 PM 90% 45% 45% 5:00 PM 75% 60% 60% 6:00 PM 65% 90% 90% 7:00 PM 60% 95% 95% 8:00 PM 55% 100% 100% 9:00 PM 40% 100% 100% 10:00 PM 38% 95% 95% 11:00 PM 13% 85% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 70% 70% DAILY PARKING DEMAN D: NUMBER OF SPACES Restauran TIME OF THE DAY Retail t Bar TOTAL 6:00 AM - - - - 7:00 AM 9 3 1 13 8:00 AM 29 5 1 35 9:00 AM 88 10 2 100 10:00 AM 132 14 2 148 11:00 AM 214 17 3 234 12:00 NOON 249 51 8 308 1:00 PM 278 76 11 365 2:00 PM 293 76 11 380 X 3:00 PM 293 76 11 380 X 4:00 PM 264 76 11 351 5:00 PM 220 101 15 336 6:00 PM 190 152 23 365 7:00 PM 176 161 24 361 8:00 PM 161 169 25 355 9:00 PM 117 169 25 311 10:00 PM 111 161 24 296 11:00 PM 38 144 21 203 12:00 MID - 118 18 136 PEAK PARKING DEMAND 380 KO- 9/5/06 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-11 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW A DRIVE-THROUGH; VARIANCE NO. 2006-03 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW THE REDUCTION IN REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG BRISTOL STREET; VARIANCE NO. 2006-04 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW THE REDUCTION IN REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PLANTERS; AND VARIANCE NO. 2006-05 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED ON SITE PARKING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2303 SOUTH BRISTOL STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11, Variance Nos. 2006-03, 2006-04 and 2006-05 came before the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana for a duly noticed public hearing on August 28, 2006. B. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana seeking to allow adrive- through for the property located at 2303 South Bristol Street. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-377.5(a) which cross-references Section 41-365.5(e), a Conditional Use Permit is required for eating establishments with drive-through window service. 2. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a conditional use permit upon making certain findings. Will the proposed use provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or community? The proposed Starbucks drive-through will contribute to the general well being of the area by providing a Resolution No. 2006-026 31 A-98 Page 1 of 14 new restaurant that will service the community, pedestrians and vehicles traveling along Bristol Street and Warner Avenue. ii. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity? The drive-through window service will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons working or residing in the area. The circulation, design, and layout of the proposed drive- though lane prevents vehicle stacking extending on to City streets. The drive-through lane complies with City standards for the proposed use with a stacking distance of 80 feet provided from the pick-up window to the order board and an additional 80 feet of stacking provided from the order point to the end of the drive-through lane. This will eliminate the possibility of cars stacking onto Bristol Street or Warner Avenue. In addition, the drive-through lane will be screened by a landscape berm and hedge to help screen vehicles using the drive-through lane and to minimize glare from vehicle headlights during evening hours. iii. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area? The new restaurant with drive-through service, in conjunction with upgrades of landscaping and circulation, will provide a visual upgrade to an existing shopping center and will provide new economic activity to this area of Bristol Street and Warner Avenue. The overall economic stability of the area will be strengthened as a result of new investment and commercial services being added to the area. iv. Witl the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code for such use? The proposed restaurant with drive-through window operation will operate in compliance with all applicable provisions of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and design standards for drive- Resolution No. 2006-026 31 A-99 Page 2 of 14 through facilities. The area adjacent to the drive- through lane will be heavily landscaped and the drive- through lane will meet the City's stacking lane requirement of 160 linear feet, as required by code. The proposed project is requesting approval of variances for a reduction in landscaping and parking. Should the variances be approved, the project will be consistent with the requirements of the General Commercial (C-2) zoning district and therefore with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. v. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any specific plan of the City? The drive-through lane for Starbucks is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial as support commercial uses, including restaurants with drive-through lanes are permitted by right under the General Commercial Land Use Designation. The project supports General Plan Land Use Policy Number 2.7, which promotes the rehabilitation of commercial properties and encourages increased levels of capital investment. C. Variance No. 2006-03 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana seeking to allow a reduction in the required landscaping along Bristol Street for the property located at 2303 South Bristol Street. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-384 which cross-references Section 41-372(a) landscaping of fifteen (15) feet shall be maintained along any property line that abuts a street. 2. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a variance upon making certain findings. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this chapter. The project site is currently developed with commercial uses and associated parking. An existing building and several existing parking spaces encroach into the required 15-foot landscape setback along Resolution No. 2006-026 31 A-1 0 0 Page 3 of 14 Bristol Street. Due to the location of existing buildings, drive aisles and the circulation and parking configuration of the site, providing the required landscape setback along Bristol Street would result in the elimination of approximately 19 on-site parking spaces. Eliminating parking to provide additional landscaping in a center that is currently under parked per City standards would deprive the subject property of privileges afforded other shopping centers in the area. Granting of the landscape variance will allow the applicant to use the property in a manner that is consistent with similar commercial uses in the area and afford the subject property the same privileges as other commercial shopping centers in the area. ii. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The property currently operates as a commercial shopping center. The applicant is making an economic investment that will visually enhance and upgrade the site as well as the surrounding area. The granting of the variance will preserve the property owner's ability to develop the property with a restaurant and retail use that will benefit both pedestrians and vehicles traveling along Bristol Street and Warner Avenue. The granting of the variance is necessary to preserve the property owners right to develop their property with a use that will benefit the community and improve and revitalize an older existing shopping center. iii. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The applicant is making an economic investment in their property that will likely stimulate additional economic investment in the area. Granting of the variance will allow the applicant to utilize their property in a manner that is consistent with similar surrounding commercial uses and therefore would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. Resolution No. 2006-026 31 A-101 Page 4 of 14 iv. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The granting of the landscape variance would not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The General Plan designation for the area is General Commercial which allows the commercial development that is proposed on the site. Since landscaping is ancillary to the primary use of the property as a commercial shopping center, the granting of a variance for a reduction of landscaping along Bristol Street would under the circumstances of this particular case have no adverse affect on the General Plan of the City. D. Variance No. 2006-04 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana seeking to allow a reduction in the required landscape planters for the property located at 2303 South Bristol Street. 1. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-372(d) and the Commercial Area Landscape requires landscape planters for the parking area. 2. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a variance upon making certain findings. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this chapter. Due to existing site constraints including the size and location of existing buildings on the property, drive aisles, circulation and parking configuration, providing 42, 8'/z feet wide by 18 feet long landscape planters would substantially reduce parking in a shopping center already deemed under parked per City parking codes. The removal of parking would impact the economic viability of the shopping center which would deprive the subject property of privileges afforded other legal non-conforming shopping centers in the area. Resolution No. 2006-026 31 A-1 0 2 Page 5 of 14 ii. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. Providing landscape planters within the shopping center parking lot would result in a loss of parking within the commercial center. The granting of the variance is necessary to preserve the property owners right to develop their property with a use that will benefit the community and improve and revitalize the existing shopping center without further reducing parking in a center currently under parked per City standards. iii. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The granting of a variance for a reduction of landscape planters within the shopping center parking lot would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The applicant is making an economic investment in their property which should stimulate other investment in the area. iv. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The granting of the landscape variance would not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The General Plan designation for the area is General Commercial which allows the commercial development that is proposed on the site. Since landscaping is ancillary to the primary use of the property as a commercial shopping center, the granting of a variance for a reduction of landscaping Bristol Street would under the circumstances of this particular case have no adverse affect on the General Plan of the City. E. Variance No. 2006-05 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana seeking to allow a reduction in the required off-street parking for the property located at 2303 South Bristol Street. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Article XV 486 parking spaces are required for the shopping center. Only 472 spaces Resolution No. 2006-026 Page 6 of 14 31 A-103 have been provided. As such a variance of 14 off-street parking spaces is requested by the applicant. 2. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a variance upon making certain findings. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this chapter. The Bristol Warner Village shopping center is a contained site surrounded by existing commercial development. The size and shape of the property can support an additional building as proposed by the applicant. RK Engineering Group Inc., Traffic Engineers, has prepared a shared parking analysis and has determined that sufficient parking is available for the project during times of peak demand. Granting of the parking variance will allow the applicant the ability to utilize their property in a manner that is consistent with similar surrounding commercial and professional uses in the area. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The granting of the parking variance will preserve the property owners right to develop the property with a new restaurant/retail building that is consistent with development allowed in the General Commercial (GC) zoning district. The new building provides an upgrade to an older legal non-conforming shopping center and preserves the property owners right to upgrade and develop their property. iii. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The findings of the parking study completed by RK Engineering Group Inc., Traffic Engineers, indicate that there will be adequate parking on the subject site at times of peak demand and therefore, the granting Resolution No. 2006-026 Page 7 of 14 31 A-104 of the variance fora 14-space parking reduction will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. Granting of the variance will allow the applicant to utilize their property in a manner that is consistent with similar surrounding commercial uses. iv. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The Granting of the parking variance would not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The property in question is located within the General Commercial General Plan designation which permits the commercial use proposed by the applicant. Since parking is ancillary to the primary use of the property as a commercial shopping center, the granting of a parking variance would under the circumstances of this particular case, have no adverse affect on the General Plan of the City. F. This project was reviewed in accordance with the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15303. This Class 3 exemption allows the construction of a store, motel, office, restaurant or similar structure in urban areas not exceeding 10,000 square feet of floor area on sites zoned for such use, if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances, where all public services and facilities are available and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2006-107 will be filed for this project. Section 2. The Planning Commission after conducting the public hearing hereby approves: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, to allow an eating establishments with drive-through window service. 2. Variance No. 2006-03 as conditioned in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein, to allow a reduction in the required landscaping along Bristol Street. 3. Variance No. 2006-04 as conditioned in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, to allow a reduction in the required landscape planters. Resolution No. 2006-026 31 A-10 5 Page 8 of 14 4. Variance No. 2006-05 as conditioned in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein to allow a fourteen (14) space reduction in the required off-street parking. These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated August 28, 2006 and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. ADOPTED this 28th day of August, 2006 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Benavides, Betancourt, Cribb, De La Torre, Gartner, Leo, Lutz (7) NOES: Commissioners: None (0) ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0) None (0) Christopher Leo Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Kylee Otto Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Martha Ramirez, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006-026 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on August 28, 2006. Date: Planning Commission Secretary City of Santa Ana 31 A-106 Resolution No. 2006-026 Page 9 of 14 Conditions for Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-11 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the following conditions of approval: The applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below rip or to exercising the rights conferred by the conditional use permit. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit. A. Planning Division 1. All proposed site improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review approval of DP No. 2005-38. 2. Any amendment to the conditional use permit must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or if the conditional use permit must be amended. 3. The berm and proposed landscaping surrounding the drive-through lane must consist of mature landscaping that will be maintained and adequately screen the drive-through lane. 4. All driveway entrance/exit pavement treatments for the shopping center shall match the new decorative driveway entrance/exit pavement approved for the new construction. 5. The applicant shall provide a plan approved by staff that will add additional trees and landscaping to the shopping center parking lot without reducing the number of parking spaces. Resolution No. 2006-026 31 A-1 O 7 Page 10 of 14 Conditions for Approval for Variance No. 2006-03 Variance No. 2006-03 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the following conditions of approval: The applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below rip or to exercising the rights conferred by the variance. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the variance. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the variance. A. Planning Division 1. All proposed site improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review approval of DP No. 2005-38. 2. All landscaping on the site shall be maintained in the same condition as when it was installed and shall be maintained with at least the same numbers and types of trees and plant material as indicated on the approved landscape plan. 3. All parking lot paving, pot holes and stripping shall be repaired when necessary and maintained as part of a regularly scheduled maintenance program. 4. All new trees added to the site shall be upgraded from 24-inch box trees to 36-inch box trees as shown on the landscape plan. 5. All driveway entrance/exit pavement treatments for the shopping center shall match the new decorative driveway entrance/exit pavement approved for the new construction. 6. The applicant shall provide a plan approved by staff that will add additional trees and landscaping to the shopping center parking lot without reducing the number of parking spaces. Resolution No. 2006-026 Page 11 of 14 31 A-108 Conditions for Approval for Variance No. 2006-04 Variance No. 2006-04 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the following conditions of approval: The applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below rip Or to exercising the rights conferred by the variance. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the variance. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the variance. A. Planning Division All proposed site improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review approval of DP No. 2005-38. 2. All landscaping on the site shall be maintained in the same condition as when it was installed and shall be maintained with at least the same numbers and types of trees and plant material as indicated on the approved landscape plan. 3. All parking lot paving, pot holes and stripping shall be repaired when necessary and maintained as part of a regularly scheduled maintenance program. 4. All new trees added to the site shall be upgraded from 24-inch box trees to 36-inch box trees as shown on the landscape plan. 5. All driveway entrance/exit pavement treatments for the shopping center shall match the new decorative driveway entrance/exit pavement approved for the new construction. 6. The applicant shall provide a plan approved by staff that will add additional trees and landscaping to the shopping center parking lot without reducing the number of parking spaces. 31 A-109 Resolution No. 2006-026 Page 12 of 14 Conditions for Approval for Variance No. 2006-05 Variance No. 2006-05 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the following conditions of approval: The applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below rip or to exercising the rights conferred by the variance. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the variance. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the variance. A. Planning Division All proposed site improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review approval of DP No. 2005-38. 2. The parking reduction shall not exceed 14 spaces (2.9 percent). 3. All landscaping on the site shall be maintained in the same condition as when it was installed and shall be maintained with at least the same numbers and types of trees and plant material as indicated on the approved landscape plan. 4. All parking lot paving, pot holes and stripping shall be repaired when necessary and maintained as part of a regularly scheduled maintenance program. 5. All new trees added to the site shall be upgraded from 24-inch box trees to 36-inch box trees as shown on the landscape plan. 6. All driveway entrance/exit pavement treatments for the shopping center shall match the new decorative driveway entrance/exit pavement approved for the new construction. 7. The applicant shall provide a plan approved by staff that will add additional trees and landscaping to the shopping center parking lot without reducing the number of parking spaces. Exhibit D Resolution No. 2006-026 31 A-110 Page 13 of 14 PROOF OF SERVICE (C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5) STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex 2nd Santa Ana, California 92702. I served the foregoing document described as: Resolution No. 2006- ~ x in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in seale enve opes a resse as follows: [insert the foiiowing here Addressee Address] [ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the addressee(s). [X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. [ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as complete and without error. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on [date] at Santa Ana, California. MARTHA RAMIREZ Resolution No. 2006-026 Page 14 of 14 31A-111 31A-112 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: RESOLUTION APPROVING RELOCATION PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN PINE STREET AND MCFADDEN AVENUE (PROJECT 06-1500) Qducation 1st C RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Adopt a resolution approving the implementation of the Relocation Plan for the Bristol Street Widening Project, between Pine Street and McFadden Avenue. DISCUSSION Over the next 18-months, the Public Works Agency anticipates completing the acquisitions of over 80 parcels for the Bristol Street Widening Project between Pine Street and McFadden Avenue. Section 6012 of the California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Chapter 6, requires the adoption of a Relocation Plan due to the displacement of 53 residential and 23 business occupants. The primary purpose of the Relocation Plan is to outline the requirements for moving and re-establishing the displaced residential and business occupants, and to demonstrate the level of advisory and financial assistance that will be provided. Based on occupant interviews, needs analyses, and searches for appropriate replacement sites, the Agency estimates relocation costs to be approximately $5,000,000. The Draft Relocation Plan was made available for public review for 30 days beginning August 16, 2006. Each potential displaced occupant was given written notification regarding the Plan's availability and his/her opportunity to submit questions and comments. The Plan was made available for review at the City libraries, the City Clerks office and at the Public Works counter. In addition, the Notice of Availability was posted in a local newspaper of general circulation for four consecutive weeks. All questions and comments have been incorporated into the final Relocation Plan. 55A-1 Resolution Approving Relocation Plan Bristol Street Widening from Pine to McFadden September 18, 2006 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been determined to be adequately evaluated in the previously prepared Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Assessment EIR No. 89-01 approved by City Council in 1990. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are appropriated in the Select Street Construction Fund (account no. 59-553-6611). i James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~Q(~Q ~ ~P ~ ~ - Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 55A-2 (P.C., 9/11 /06) RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RELOCATION PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT, BETWEEN PINE STREET AND McFADDEN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Over the next 18-months, the Public Works Agency anticipates completing the acquisitions of over 80 parcels for the Bristol Street Widening Project between Pine Street and McFadden Avenue. 1. Section 6012 of the California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Chapter 6, requires the adoption of a Relocation Plan due to the displacement of 53 residential and 23 business occupants. 2. A Draft Resolution Plan was made available for public review for 30 days beginning August 16, 2006 3. Each potential displaced occupant was give written notification regarding the Plan's availability and his/her opportunity to submit questions and comments. 4. The Plan was made available for review at the City libraries, the City Clerks office and at the Public Works counter. 5. The Notice of Availability was posted in a local newspaper of general circulation for four consecutive weeks. Section 2. The City Council hereby adopts this resolution approving the implementation of the Relocation Plan for the Bristol Street Widening Project, between Pine Street and McFadden Avenue. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. Resolution No. 2006-XXX 55A-3 Page 1 of 2 ADOPTED this day of 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Paula J. Coleman Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Resolution No. 2006-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Resolution No. 2006-XXX Page 2 of 2 Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 55A-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: RESOLUTION FOR THE ADOPTION A POLICY TO ENCOURAGE THE PROCUREMENT OF RECYCLED PRODUCTS CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended OF ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ IT NAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Adopt a resolution to encourage the procurement of recycled products. DISCUSSION Beginning in 2006, various state grants are requiring that local agencies adopt policies that encourage the purchase of recycled products as a condition of application consideration. For over 12 years, the City has applied for such grants to initiate the Used Oil Recycling Program, household hazardous waste collection, bottle and can recycling, as well as other recycling programs. In addition, the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency has received several grants to fund various capital projects including a Park Playground Accessibility and Recycling Grant for rubber surfacing of the playground area at Heritage Park and construction of the new playground at the Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park. Proposition 40, the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection Act of 2002 grant funds, were obtained for the installation of the new synthetic turf soccer field at the Dan Young Soccer Complex at Centennial Park. Currently, the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency is applying for the California Integrated Waste Management Tire Derived Product Grant Program (TDP) for playground renovations at Sandpointe and Santa Anita parks. The resolution will not only meet the requirement for grant applications, but will formalize the practice of purchasing recycled content products and will promote a sustainable business practice citywide. 55B-1 Resolution for a Policy for Recycled Products September 18, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. ~~Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency] FG/SHn/Rsltn 06-XX1.2:uc 55B-2 RESOLUTION Iss09/12/06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADOPTING A POLICY TO ENCOURAGE THE PROCUREMENT OF RECYCLED PRODUCTS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB939) mandates that cities reduce solid waste by 50% and that they participate in and promote recycling programs. B. The City of Santa Ana's participation in and promotion of recycling and other waste diversion strategies can significantly reduce the volume of material entering the waste stream, conserve valuable resources, minimize disposal costs, and is the sustainable way to conduct business. C. The enactment of a procurement resolution is intended to broaden the use of recycled content products currently purchased and increase the recycled content of products purchased and used by the City. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana encourages City Agencies to buy recycled products and provide purchasing preferences for recycled products. Section3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana desires that every Agency request environmentally preferred products and services without compromising overall budgetary or performance requirements. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby authorizes the Executive Director of Finance and Management Services to: 1. Evaluate recycled products to determine the extent to which they may be used by the City and its contractors. 2. Purchase recycled products whenever practical. Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. Resolution No. 2006-XXX Page 1 of 2 55B-3 ADOPTED this day of APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Laura Sheedy Assistant City Attorney 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Resolution No. to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2006-XXX Page 2 of 2 55B-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL/ AGENCY ACTION MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 TITLE: APPROVAL OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CITY PROPERTY RENOVATIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND GRANT GENERAL CONTRACTORS ~~ CITY MANAGER E CECUTIVE DI CTOR RECOMMENDED ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILE NUMBER 1. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute a Program Management Agreement for Santa Ana Auto Mall Property Renovations with Grant General Contractors in an amount not to exceed $260,000. 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $314,000. 3. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Santa Ana and the Community Redevelopment Agency for Agency funding of these public improvements. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION Direct the Agency General Counsel to prepare and authorize the Executive Director to execute a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Santa Ana and the Community Redevelopment Agency for funding of these public improvements. CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1st Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO 80A-1 Approval of Program Management Agreement for City Property Renovations Between the City of Santa Ana and Grant General Contractors September 18, 2006 Page 2 DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Auto Mall was originally established by the Community Redevelopment Agency in 1984 to assist with the retention and expansion of local auto dealerships. The mall currently has 12 manufacturers within eight new car dealerships, generating approximately $3.9 million in annual sales tax revenue for the City. In May 2003, the Agency sold $20 million in tax allocation bonds for the expansion and enhancement of the mall. The expansion of the Auto Mall is well underway and includes the opening of the mall to Edinger Avenue along with various upgrades, such as new signage and landscaping, which are expected to benefit all the dealerships. Various improvements in the City's right of way have also been identified for overall enhancement of the mall. Some of these improvements consist of removal of the guard shack, new landscaping in the median island, directional signage, fence replacement and/or re- painting, and landscape and signage improvements to the Ritchey Street entrance. Grant Contractors is currently performing the improvements on the Crevier expansion, which will include (phase II) landscape improvements along Edinger and construction of a new right turn lane on Auto Mall Drive for the City. Due to economy of scale and to ensure coordination of improvements with least impact to the dealers, it is desirable to utilize this same contractor for the interior improvements of the mall under a Program Management Agreement. Grant Contractors is a very experienced and highly regarded general contractor and was the general contractor for Crevier BMW's original facility in the Auto Mall. The Program Manager would provide general administration of the Agreement, manage and supervise the consultants and design professionals, manage the bidding of all components of construction for the project. Grant would also serve as construction manager for this project. The contract will guarantee the cost of the project and Grant Contractors will assume all the risks. The projected cost of the project is a not to exceed amount of $260,000, assuming it runs concurrent with Crevier's phase II improvements (expected to commence January - March 2007). 80A-2 Approval of Program Management Agreement for City Property Renovations Between the City of Santa Ana and Grant General Contractors September 18, 2006 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption ER No. 06-139 will be filed for this report. FISCAL IMPACT The Funding Analysis shows a total estimated construction cost of $314,000 for the project (Exhibit 1). Funds are available in the South Main Tax Allocation Bond Series 2003A Capital Project account (account 552-936-6631, Project 9257). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Nancy T. dwards ~~_ ~ancisco Gutierrez Assistant Director Executive Director Community Development Agency Finance and Management Services Agency SGH/VU/SG/mlr H:\ACTIONS\2006 CC\JT CC-CRA Grant Contract at Risk Auto Mall 9-18-06.doc 80A-3 FUNDING ANALYSIS AUTO MALL PROPERTY RENOVATIONS Construction Contract Additional Inspection & Testing Contingencies $260,000 15,000 39,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $314,000 Exhibit 1 80A-4