HomeMy WebLinkAbout75B - ORD MERGED REDEVE PLANSREQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
JUNE 4, 2007
TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE MERGED REDEVELOPMENT
PLANS TO EXTEND CERTAIN TIME
LIMITS
~~_
ITY MANAGER
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
APPROVED
^ As Recommended
^ As Amended
^ Ordinance on 1" Reading
^ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading
^ Implementing Resolution
^ Set Public Hearing For_
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt an ordinance extending time
redevelopment plans and extending
increment to repay indebtedness by
and making certain required findings,
limits on the effectiveness of the
the time limit on the use of tax
one year for eligible project areas
DISCUSSION
As a result of Senate Bi11 1096 (SB 1096) implementing the California
State Budget for FY 2004-2005, the Community Redevelopment Agency was
required to make a $3,330,894.37 payment to the County Educational
Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) on May 10, 2006. SB 1096 also included
a provision that allows the legislative body to adopt an ordinance to
amend the redevelopment plan extending the time limit on the use of tax
increment to repay indebtedness and extend the plan effectiveness by one
year for a redevelopment agency making an ERAF payment. For
Redevelopment Plans with 10 to 20 years remaining, the legislation
requires that the legislative body finds that the Agency is in compliance
with the major housing requirements. These include the requirement to
deposit twenty percent of the gross tax increment into the housing set-
aside fund, the adoption of a housing implementation plan, compliance
with housing replacement and inclusionary obligations, and certification
that no excess surplus exists. Redevelopment plans with 20 years or more
remaining cannot be extended.
75B-1
P. H. - Ordinance Amending the Merged
Redevelopment Plans to Extend Certain Time Limits
June 4, 2007
Page 2
The City of Santa Ana has a merged redevelopment project area consisting
of Central City, Inter-City, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and
Bristol Corridor. The following time limits are proposed for amendment:
TIME LIMIT ON TIME LIMIT ON TIME LIMIT ON TII~ZE LIMIT ON
PLAN PLAN PLAN RECEIPT OF TALC RECEIPT OF TAX
EFFECTIVENESS EFFECTIVENESS INCREMENT INCREMENT
(CURRENT DATE) (PROPOSED (CURRENT DATE) (PROPOSED
DATE) DATE)
Central City July 2, 2015 July 2, 2016 July 2, 2025 July 2, 2026
Inter-City July 6, 2024 July 6, 2025 July 6, 2034 July 6, 2035
North Harbor July 6, 2024 July 6, 2025 July 6, 2034 July 6, 2035
South Harbor July 6, 2029 July 6, 2025 July 6, 2034 July 6, 2035
South Main July 6, 2029 July 6, 2025 July 6, 2034 July 6, 2035
*Bristol December 4, December 4, December 4, December 4,
2030 2030 2040 2040
*Not eligible for one year extension under SB1096.
Notice of this public hearing was mailed to the governing body of each
affected taxing entity on May 3, 2007, or prior to the first reading of
the proposed ordinance on June 4, 2007, and published in the Orange
County Register on May 24, 2007, 10 days prior to the hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
J ~~
Ste en G. Ha ding
Deputy City nager for Development Services
Community Development Agency
SGH/NTE/mlr
H:\ACTIONS\2007 CC\P. H. OrdAmendMergedRe devPlanExtCertTimeLimts 6-9-07.doc
75B-2
5/24/07 LES
ORDINANCE NO. NS-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE
MERGED REDEVELOPMENT PLANS TO
EXTEND CERTAIN TIME LIMITS AND MAKING
CERTAIN REQUIRED FINDINGS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. As a result of Senate Bill 1096 (SB 1096) implementing the California
State Budget for fiscal year 2004-2005, the Community Redevelopment Agency
("Agency")was required to make a $3,330,894.37 payment to the County
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund ("ERAF") by May 10, 2006.
B. The legislation also included a provision that allows the legislative body
to adopt an ordinance to amend the redevelopment plan extending the time limit
on the use of tax increment to repay indebtedness and extend the plan
effectiveness by one year for a redevelopment agency making an ERAF
payment.
C. For Redevelopment Plans with 10 to 20 years remaining, the
legislation requires that the legislative body find that the Agency is in compliance
with the major housing requirements. These include the requirement to deposit
20% of the gross tax increment into the housing set-aside fund, the adoption of a
housing implementation plan, compliance with housing replacement and
inclusionary obligations, and certification that no excess surplus exists. Plans
with 20 years or more remaining cannot be extended.
D. The City of Santa Ana has a merged redevelopment project area
consisting of Central City, Inter-City, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main
and Bristol Corridor.
75B-3
Section 2. The following time limits are proposed for amendment:
TIME LIMIT ON TIME LIMIT ON TIME LIMIT TIME LIMIT
PLAN PLAN PLAN ON RECEIPT ON RECEIPT
EFFECTIVENESS EFFECTIVENESS OF TAX OF TAX
(CURRENT {PROPOSED INCREMENT INCREMENT
DATE) DATE) (CURRENT (PROPOSED
DATE DATE
Central July 2, 2015 July 2, 2016 July 2, 2025 July 2, 2026
Cit
Inter-Cit Jul 6, 2024 Jul 6, 2025 Jul 6, 2034 Jul 6, 2035
North July 6, 2024 July 6, 2025 July 6, 2034 July 6, 2035
Harbor
South July 6, 2024 July 6, 2025 July 6, 2034 July 6, 2035
Harbor
South July 6, 2024 July 6, 2025 July 6, 2034 July 6, 2035
Main
"Bristol December 4, 2030 December 4, 2030 December 4, December 4,
2040 2040
*Not eligible for one year extension under SB1096.
Section 3. Notice of the public hearing was mailed to the governing body
of each affected taxing entity thirty days prior to the first reading of the proposed
ordinance and published as required by law, ten days prior to the hearing.
Section 4. If any sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or
portions of this Ordinance are for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this and
each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance
whether or not any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses,
phrases or portions may be declared invalid or unconstitutional on their face or
as applied.
2
75B-4
ADOPTED this day of , 2007
Miguel A. Pulido
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By:
Lisa E. Storck
Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that
the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted
by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said
ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana.
Date:
Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
3
75B-5
75B-6