My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/01/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:32:18 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 10:32:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Becerra, Alexis <br />From: Jorge Rivera < <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 8:35 AM <br />To: eComment <br />Subject: Item 16 Council Agenda <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Dear Mayor and City Council Members, <br />I am writing about Item 16 on your upcoming council agenda, which proposes a raise for the newly hired City <br />Manager after only three months in the position. I believe this raise is unjustified and reflects poorly on the <br />decision -making process for our city's leadership. <br />In the short time that this individual has been in the role, his presence has been barely noticeable, and his <br />approachability has been limited. I have encountered him at different city events, and I have found him to be <br />rather unapproachable. His leadership is unproven, and it raises questions about the initial decision to hire <br />him. Was this an internal hire? How did he go from Code Enforcement Manager to City Manager? Why does <br />he deserve a raise only 3 months into his job? <br />There are concerns regarding the behavior of the City Manager and his inappropriate relationship with his <br />Deputy City Manager. While I understand that rumors should be approached with caution, the overall <br />situation is troubling, especially given prior allegations against him (https://voiceofoc.org/2015/10/sex-in-the- <br />city-hall ). I believe these concerns warrant further attention. It questions his professionalism and ethics. <br />Given the financial challenges our city is facing, including a projected budget deficit, it seems irresponsible to <br />give him a raise. Instead, I urge you to consider investing those resources in our community, such as libraries <br />and parks, which are good for all Santa Ana youths. <br />I ask that you reconsider this raise and explore ways to better serve the community with the available funds. <br />Sincerely <br />Jorge Rivera <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.