Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout25N - STUDY CSUF REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCil MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCil USE ONLY: APRIL 7, 2008 TITLE: APPROVED o As Recommended o As Amended o Ordinance on 151 Reading o Ordinance on 2nd Reading o Implementing Resolution o Set Public Hearing For Ct AGREEMENT WITH CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER, TO CONDUCT RETURN ON INVESTMENT, PHASE III STUDY alJJi2~ CI MANAGER CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute the attached agreement with California State University Fullerton, Social Science Research Center, to conduct the Return on Investment, Phase III Study for an amount of $20,000 for a term period of January 2008 to June 30, 2009. WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD ACTION Accepted the proposal from California State University, Fullerton Social Science Research Center to conduct the Return on Investment, Phase III Study for an amount not to exceed $20,000 and recommended the City Manager execute the agreement. By a vote of 22:0 (Beasley, Fischer, Jimenez-Hami, Lewis, Meeting of September 14, 2007. Campanelli, Claudio, de Leon, Metzler, Novelo, Ward absent) Didion, at its DISCUSSION At its January 12, 2007, meeting, the Workforce Investment Board (WIB) authorized the Oversight and Data Committee to develop and release a Request for Proposals (RFP) to conduct quarterly surveys of a select group of clients who have utilized the Santa Ana WORK Center's services in order to measure the value of those services. This will be a Phase III Return on Investment (ROI) study and a follow-up to the first and second ROI studies. The first study evaluated the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) funds spent on clients who had been enrolled and exited WIA during Program Year 2002-03 and then a second study evaluated universal access customers who used the Santa Ana WORK Center during Program Year 25N-1 Agreement - Return on Investment, Phase III Study April 7, 2008 Page 2 2003-04. The first investment for Santa investment. Both www.santaanawib.com study concluded that there was a 300% return on Ana and the second study showed a 473% return on studies are posted on the WIB's web site: The Request for Proposal was developed and released on October 16, 2007. A public notice was published in the Orange County Register on October 14 & 15, 2007. The RFP was emailed to eleven interested parties. Proposals were due November 13, 2007, and one proposal was submitted by California State University Fullerton (CSUF). The members of the Oversight and Data Committee rated this proposal well above the required 70% threshold with an average score of 89.5 points (89.5%). The Oversight and Data Committee recommended accepting the proposal from CSUF, Social Science Research Center, at its regular meeting on December 7, 2007, and recommended funding for an amount not to exceed $20,000. The contract was prepared by the City Attorney's Office. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Workforce Investment Act WIB Admin 07-08 account (account no. 123-190-6291). r2~{ ~dk-/~ L~rancisco Gutierrez fJ D Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency ephen G. Hard'ng i.~ Deputy City Manager for ))' Development Services Community Development Agency SGH/LS/FJ/mlr 040708 AgreeCSFRetOnlnvestment-III 25N-2 N-2008-027 Contract No. AGREEMENT UNDER THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT TO CONDUCT RETURN ON INVESTMENT STUDY PHASE III THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this '7f/; day of January, 2008, by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("CITY") and California State University Fullerton Social Science Research Center through the CSU Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation, a 501(cX3) non-profit corporation ("CONTRACTORII). W-I- T -N-:E-S-S':E- T-H Recitals: A. CITY has been designated a Local Workforce Investment Area (LWIA) under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, Public Law 105-220 ("the Act"). B. The State of California has created the L WIA to administer the Act programs operated by the State of California pursuant to the Act. C. As a L WIA, CITY is entitled to receive federal funds to establish programs and to provide job training to those individuals who are economically disadvantaged or otherwise face serious barriers in obtaining productive employment. The Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board (WIB)/Oversight and Data Committee and the Local Workforce Investment Area (L WIA) desire to hire an entity to conduct a Return on hivestment (RO!) Study for Program Year (PY) 07-08 on its Santa Ana Workforce Investment System (the "Study"). D. CONTRACTOR is experienced in the special skill and knowledge needed to conduct the Return on Investment (RO!) Study - Phase III of Local Workforce Investment System for the Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board (WIB). CONTRACTOR shall perform a four-quarter study to determine the ROI generated by this system for the universal access customers who used the one-stop at least one time during PY 07-08 to look for employment and used one or more of the various services available at the WORK Center for universal access customers. E. California law. CONTRACTOR is willing to operate said Study pursuant to the Act and WHEREFORE, for and in consideration of the respective and mutual covenants and promises hereinafter contained and made, and subject to all the terms and conditions hereof, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 25N-3 Page I of 14 I. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS A. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide and shall perform a Return on Investment Study and services, as more specifically set forth in the Request for Proposals sent out by the City, attached hereto and incorporated herein as '_" to this Agreement, as well as the services set forth in Consultant's Proposal dated November 13, 2007, attached hereto and incorporated herein as '_' to this Agreement. Services shall be performed in accordance with the exhibits and the timelines and deadlines contained therein. CONTRACTOR'S failure to provide said services may be grounds for CITY to readjust the level of payment to CONTRACTOR otherwise provided for hereinafter. p . . . . . B. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform the services set forth herein in a professional, timely and diligent manner. C CONTRACTOR shall provide wages and benefits to CONTRACTOR employees who participate in the activities and services funded by this Agreement ("Employees") in accordance with the standards and requirements of the Act, including Section 181 of the Act. D. CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the Labor Standards described in the Act including Section 181 of the Act. E. CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with the "Complaint Handling Procedures under the WIA", attached hereto as _ and incorporated herein as though fully set forth in 20 CFR S667.200, Subpart F. CITY's procedures for handling complaints alleging a violation of the Act, regulations, grants, or other agreements under the Act shall be followed and any decision of CITY, the State or the federal government relating to the complaint shall be binding and followed by CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTORS who are employers shall operate a grievance system that is similar to CITY's procedures for resolution of complaints relating to the terms and conditions of employment. F. As a condition of this award offmancial assistance under the Act to CONTRACTOR from CITY, CONTRACTOR assures, with respect to operation of all programs or activities funded with funds provided pursuant to the Act, and all agreements or arrangements to carry out such programs or activities, that it will comply fully with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of the Act (Section 188); the Nontraditional Employment for Women Act of 1991; Title VI of the Civil Ri@1ts Act of 1964, as amended; section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; and with all applicable requirements imposed by or pursuant to regulations implementing those laws, including, but not limited to, 29 CFR part 37. The United States, the State of California and CITY have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this assurance. G. CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain such records and submit such reports, data and information, on the form and containing such information, at such times as CITY may request or require regarding the performance of CONTRACTOR'S services or activities, costs or other data, including but not limited to, participants' attendance, payroll records and job duty statements. 25N-4 Page 2 of 14 CITY, the State of California and the United States government and/or their representatives shall have access for purposes of monitoring, auditing and examining of CONTRACTOR'S activities, performance, books, documents, papers, and records of CONTRACTOR subcontractors, bookkeepers and accountants, and employees related to this Agreement. Such agencies or representatives shall also schedule on-site monitoring in their discretion. Monitoring activities may also include, but are not limited to, questioning employees and entering any premises or onto any site in which any of the services or activities funded hereunder are conducted or in which any of the records of CONTRACTOR are kept. Nothing herein shall be construed to require access to any privileged or confidential information as set forth in federal or state law. In the event CONTRACTOR does not make the above-referenced documents available within the City of Santa Ana, California, CONTRACTOR agrees to pay all necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by CITY in conducting any audit at the location where said records arid books of account are maintained. All accounting records and evidence pertaining to all costs of CONTRACTOR and all documents related to this Agreement shall be kept available at the location where CONTRACTOR conducted the Study, as well as in the County of Orange, for the duration of this Agreement and thereafter for three (3) years after completion of an audit. Records which relate to (a) complaints, claims, administrative proceedings or litigation arising out of the performance of this Agreement, or (b) costs and expenses of this Agreement to which CITY, the State of California or the United States Government take exception, shall be retained beyond the three (3) years until resolution of disposition of such appeals, litigation, claims, or exceptions. H. Without prejudice to any other section of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall, where applicable, maintain the confidential nature of information provided to it concerning participants in accordance with the requirements of federal and state law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONTRACTOR agrees to submit to CITY, the State of California and/or the United States Government or their representatives, all records requested for administrative purposes, including audits, examinations, monitoring and verification of records submitted by CONTRACTOR, costs incurred and services rendered hereunder. 1. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete and submit Invoices, in triplicate, with three quarterly reports, and a [mal Invoice with the Final Report to be presented to the WID upon completion of the Study. Each Invoice shall show in detail the amount of money owed by CITY to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR agrees to submit the above-stated documents to the WIB Administrative Office, 888 W. Santa Ana Blvd. #208, P.O. Box 1988 (M-73), Santa Ana, California, 92702-1988. J. CONTRACTOR agrees to expend all funds in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. CONTRACTOR also agrees to provide at CONTRACTOR'S own expense supplies and other costs of said STUDY. K. CONTRACTOR shall arrange independently for an audit that includes WIA funds received from CITY, in accordance with the Act and 20 CFR Section 667.200. CONTRACTOR shall submit one original of each required audit report to CITY within (30) days after the date received 25N-5 Page 3 of 14 by CONTRACTOR. Should CONTRACTOR fail to comply with these requirements, CITY may at its option withhold payment of funds, or disallow funds or suspend additional grant funds. L. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Circular A-21, Cost Principles for Educational Institutions of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Circular A-133, and Uniform Administrative requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-profit Organizations (OMB Circular A-II 0). O. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the requirements of federal regulations found at 29 CFR 93 which provide that no appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, member of Congress or an officer or employee of a member of Congress in connection with awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant or loan, entering into any cooperative il.gieement and the extension, renewal, amendment or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan or co.... agreement. CONTRACTOR shall sign a certification to that effect in a form as set forth in ," attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. CONTRACTOR shall submit said signed certification to CITY prior to performing any of its obligations under this Agreement and prior to any obligation arising on the part of CITY to pay any sums to CONTRACTOR under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. P. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide a drug-free work place and to execute a certification as set forth in "_" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Q. CONTRACTOR, in accordance with the Child Support Compliance Act, recognizes and acknowledges the importance of child and family support obligations and shall fully comply with all state and federal laws relating to child and family support enforcement, including, but not limited to: disclosure of information and compliance with earnings assignment orders, as provided in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 5200) of Part 5 of Division 9 of the state Family Code; and, to the best of its knowledge is fully complying with the earnings assignment orders of all employees and is providing the names of all new employees to the New Employee Registry maintained by the California Employment Development Department (EDD). R. CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all applicable provisions of the ACT and the federal regulations, including but not limited to the regulations found at 20 CFR part 629. S. Based on the population eligible to be served, or likely to be directly affected by the WIA program or activity, the services or information may need to be provided in a language other than English in order to allow such population to be effectively informed about or able to participate in the program or activity. Pursuant to 29 CFR 37.35, the CONTRACTOR must take reasonable steps to provide services and information in appropriate languages after considering the scope of the program or activity, and the size and concentration of the population that needs services or information in a language other than English. 25N-6 Page 4 of 14 II. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS A. CITY agrees to pay to CONTRACTOR when, if and to the extent federal funds are received under the provisions of the Act a sum not to exceed Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) for CONTRACTOR'S performance in accordance with the payment schedule attached hereto as _ (if applicable) during the term of this Agreement. Said sum shall be paid after CITY receives invoices submitted by CONTRACTOR on a quarterly basis, as provided hereinabove. B. CITY has the right to de-obligate the funds hereunder due to any of the following reasons: (a) lack of performance by CONTRACTOR and (b) lack of fiscal accountability of CON1RACTOR. ill. TIME PE:RIOD OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall commence on January 7, 2008, and all duties arising under this Agreement shall have been performed by June 30, 2009. The term of this Agreement may be extended by a writing executed by the Deputy City Manager for Development Services and the City Attorney. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer-employee relationship, ajoint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, el11ployer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. V. WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYER'S RIGHTS A. CONTRACTOR shall use appropriate funds received from CITY to provide workers' compensation to all those hired by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. B. CONTRACTOR shall have the right to hire, dismiss, or promote its employees or contract personnel hired under this Agreement so long as its hiring or dismissal policy or standard does not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, or any other applicable law, and CONTRACTOR maintains itself as an Equal Opportunity employer. 25N-7 Page 5 of 14 VI. APPLICABLE GUIDELINES A. The parties hereto agree that CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including, but not limited to the Performance Standards, attached hereto as _ (if applicable) and incorporated herein, and general program requirements described in Sections 106 and 141 of the Act (29 USC Sections 1516 and 1551) and applicable regulations, and the U.S. Department of Labor guidelines and regulations, including amendments or revisions made during the terms of this Agreement. Said applicable laws are hereby incorporated by reference and made as part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. B. CONTRACTOR also assures and certifies that: 1. . . CONTRACTOR shall comply with Title vn of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (p.L. 83-354) and in accordance with Title VII of the Act, no person shall, on the grounds ofrace, color, religion, sex, age, handicap or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under this Agreement. 2. CONTRACTOR shall comply with any and all federal laws limiting the political activity of employees hired under this Agreement. 3. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the requirements that no program under the Act shall involve political activities. 4. RECORD INSPECTION. CONTRACTOR shall provide the U.S. Department of Labor and the Controller General, by and through any authorized representative, as well as the WIB Administrative Office, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents relating to the accounting and use of funds under this Agreement for a three-year period from and after the effective date of this Agreement. 5. No person with responsibilities in the operation of any program under the Act shall discriminate with respect to any program participant or any application for participation in such program because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, political affiliation or beliefs. 6. CONTRACTOR shall maintain appropriate standards for health and safety in work and training situations. 7. CONTRACTOR shall comply with general provisions, assurances, and certifications attached hereto as _ and incorporated herein. 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY. Any literature distributed by CONTRACTOR for the purpose of apprising businesses, participants, or the general public of its programs under this Agreement shall state that its programs are supported by the City of Santa Ana and the Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board, and shall state that the program is an "equal opportunity employer/program" and that "auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with disabilities. " 25N-8 Page 6 of 14 9. CONTRACTOR certifies that all property, fmished or unfmished documents, data, studies and reports prepared or purchased under this Agreement, will be disposed of in accordance with the direction of the CITY. In addition, any tools and/or equipment furnished to the CONTRACTOR by the CITY and/or purchased by the CONTRACTOR with funds pursuant to this Agreement, will be limited to use within the activities outlined in this agreement and will remain the property of the United States Government and/or CITY. Upon termination of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR will immediately return such tools and/or equipment to the CITY or dispose of them in accordance with the direction of the CITY. 10. CONTRACTOR certifies that this Agreement does not provide for the advancement or aid to any religious sect, church or creed, or sectarian purpose nor does it help to support or sustain any school, college, university, hospital or other institution controlled by any religious creed, church, or sectarian denomination, as specified by Article XVI, Section 5, of the Constitution of the State of California, regaidmg separation of church and state. 11. PATENT, COPYRIGHTS AND RIGHTS IN DATA. The CONTRACTOR will disclose to the CITY any invention, written product, computer program developed or data assembled as a result of performance of work under this Agreement within seventy- four (74) days of invention, development or assembly. The CITY, State of California, and U.S. Department of Labor will have the right to patent any invention and copyright any \\ntten product or computer program or data generated by CONTRACTOR. Upon written request, CONTRACTOR will transfer all pertinent information, specifications and right, title and interest to the designated agency. 12. INVENTIONS, PATENTS AND COPYRIGHTS. A. Reporting Procedure. If any project produces patentable items, patent rights, processes, or inventions in the course of work under a U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) grant or agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall report the fact promptly and fully to the CITY. The CITY shall report the fact to the Grant Officer, at the DOL. Unless there is a prior agreement between the CITY and the DOL and its representative on these matters, the DOL shall determine whether to seek protection on the invention or discovery. The DOL and its representative shall determine how the rights in the invention or discovery, including rights under any patent issued thereon, will be allocated and administered in order to protect the public interest consistent with the "Governmental Patent Policy" (President's Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, August 23, 1971, and Statement of Government Patent Policy as printed in 36 FR 16889). B. Copyright Policy. 1. Unless otherwise provided in the terms of the grant or agreement, when copyright-able material is developed in the course of or under a DOL Grant or agreement, the author and the CITY which developed the work is free to copyright material or to permit others to do so. The CONTRACTOR and the wrB shall have a royalty-free, nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, use and to authorize others to use all copyrighted material. 2. The DOL reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for Federal Government purposes: (a) The copyright in any work developed under any grant, sub-grant, or contract under a grant or subgrant; (b) Any right of copyright to which a grantee, subgrantee or a CONTRACTOR purchases ownership with grant support; and (c) CONTRACTOR shall comply with the requirements of29 CFR Part 97.34. 25N-9 Page 7 of 14 C. Rights to Data. The DOL and the CITY shall have unlimited rights to any data first procured or delivered under this Agreement. 13, CLEAN AIR / CLEAN WATER ACT. If the grant hereunder exceeds $100,000, CONTRACTOR must comply with Section 306 of the Clean Air Act [(42 USC 1875(h)]; Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1368); Executive Order 11738 and Environmental Protection Agency ("EP A") regulations (40 CFR Part 15) as any may now exist or be hereafter amended, Under these laws and regulations, the CONTRACTOR assures that: (a) No facility to be utilized in the performance of the proposed grant has been listed on the EP A List of Violating Facilities; (b) It will notify CITY prior to award of the receipt of any communication from the Director, Office' of Federal Activities, U.S.-EP A, indicating that a facility to be utilized for the grant is under consideration to be listed on the EP A List of Violating Facilities; ( c) It will notify the CITY and the EP A about any known violation of the above laws and regulations. C. CONTRACTOR agrees to adhere to the following STANDARDS OF CONDUCT: 1. General Assurance. Every reasonable course of action will be taken by CONTRACTOR in order to maintain the integrity of this expenditure of public funds and to avoid favoritism. This Agreement will be administered in an impartial manner, free from errors to gain personal, fmancial political gain. CONTRACTOR, its officers and employees, in administering this Agreement, will avoid sitUations which give rise to a suggestion that any decision was influenced by prejudice, bias, special interest or desire for personal gain. 2, Employment of Former State or CITY Employees. CONTRACTOR will ensure that any of its employees who were formerly employed by the State of California or CITY, in a position that could have enabled such individuals to impact policy regarding or implementation of programs covered by this Agreement, will not be assigned to any part or phase of the activities conducted pursuant to this Agreement for a period of not less than two years following the termination of such employment. 3, Conducting Business Involving Relatives. No relative by blood, adoption or marriage of any executive or employee of CONTRACTOR will receive favorable treatment when considered for enrollment in programs provided by, or employment with, CONTRACTOR. 4. Conducting Business Involving Close Personal Friends and Associates. Executives and employees of CONTRACTOR will be particularly aware of the varying degrees of influence that can be exerted by personal friends and associates and, in administering this Agreement, will exercise due diligence to avoid situations which give rise to an assertion that favorable treatment is being granted to friends and associates. When it is in the public interest for CONTRACTOR to conduct business with a friend or associate of an executive or employee of CONTRACTOR, an elected official in the area or a voting or non-voting member of the Workforce Investment Board (WID), a permanent record of the transaction will be retained. 25N-10 Page 8 of 14 5. Avoidance of Conflict of Economic Interest. No executive or employee of CONTRACTOR elected official in the area, or voting or non-voting member of a WIB, will solicit or accept money or any other consideration from a third person, for the performance of an act reimbursed in whole or part by CONTRACTOR or CITY. Supplies, materials, equipment or services purchased with Agreement funds will be used solely for purposes asserted or allowed under this Agreement. No voting member of the WIB will cast a vote on the provision of services or vote on any matter which would provide direct financial benefit to that member or any business or organization which the member directly represents. VII. HOLD HARMLESS A, CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and save harmless CITY, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all damages to property or injuries to or death of any person or persons, including' property and employees or agents of CITY, and shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions or proceedings of any kind or nature, including, but not by way of limitation, workers' compensation claims, resulting from or arising out of the negligent acts, errors or omission of CONTRACTOR, its employees or subcontractors. B. CITY shall indemnify and save harmless CONTRACTOR, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all damages to property or injuries to or death of any person or persons, including property and employees or agents of CONTRACTOR, and shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CONTRACTOR, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, demands, suits, actions or proceedings therefore, resulting from or arising out of the intentional or malicious acts of CITY, its employees or subcontractors. VIII. INSURANCE 1. Commercial General Liability. Due to the nature of the work and services being performed off-site, CONTRACTOR need not provide proof of such insurance to the CITY. 2. Workers' Compensation, If CONTRACTOR is an "employer", as set forth in California Labor Code Section 3300 et seq., or utilizes participants and/or individuals as "employees," as set forth in California Labor Code Section 3350 et seq., CONTRACTOR shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this Agreement full Workers' Compensation insurance coverage for injuries suffered by such employees and provide CITY proof of said coverage. IX. CORPORATE STATUS All corporate CONTRACTORS shall be in good standing, without suspension by the California Secretary of State, Franchise Tax Board and Internal Revenue Service. Any change in corporate status or suspension shall be reported immediately to CITY. 25N-11 Page 9 of 14 X. ASSIGNABILITY None of the duties of, or work to be performed by, CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall be subcontracted or assigned to any agency, consultant, or person without the prior written consent of CITY. CONTRACTOR must submit all subcontracts and other agreements that relate to this Agreement to CITY. No subcontract or assignment shall terminate or alter the legal obligations of CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement. XI. LAWS GOVERNING THIS AGREEMENT In its performance under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall fully comply with the requirements of the following, whether or not otherwise referred to in "tIlls Agreement: 1. The Act and all applicable federal statutes, regulations, policies, procedures and directives, including but not limited to, 20 C.F.R. Parts 652 and 660 through 671, 2. All applicable State statutes, regulations, policies, procedures and directives; 3. All applicable CITY policies, procedures and directives; 4. All applicable local ordinances and requirements, including use permits and licensing; 5. Court orders applicable to its operation; and, 6. The terms and conditions of this Agreement. If any of the foregoing is enacted, amended, or revised, CONTRACTOR will comply with such or will notify CITY after enactment or modification that it cannot so comply. CITY may thereupon terminate this Agreement at its sole discretion. XII. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of CONTRACTOR by CITY, and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such employment. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are -not embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both CITY and CONTRACTOR. 25N-12 Page 10 of 14 XlII. FRAUD CONTRACTOR shall immediately report to CITY all instances and facts concerning possible fraud, abuse or criminal activity relating to expenditure or receipt of funds under this Agreement. XlV. CONTINGENCY OF FUNDS CONTRACTOR acknowledges that approval of and funding for this Agreement is contingent upon State approval, and funds received or obligated from the State of California to CITY. If such approval of funds is not forthcoming, or is otherwise limited, CITY shall immediately notify CONTRACTOR. Within twenty (20) days of re~eipt of such notice, CONTRACTOR shall modify or cease operations as directed by CITY and negotiate necessary modification to this Agreement and/or reimbursement of costs incurred hereunder. XV. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either party at its sole discretion, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. Notice shall be deemed served on the date of mailing. However, CONTRACTOR may not terminate this Agreement if undue hardship will result to any participant. XVI. DISPUTES Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any dispute concerning any question arising under this Agreement shall be decided by CITY. In such a case CITY shall reduce its decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy thereof to CONTRACTOR. The decision of the City shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) calendar days from the mailing or delivery of such copy, CITY receives from CONTRACTOR written request to appeal said decision. Procedures governing the appeal shall be prescribed by CITY and/or the State of California in accordance with the Act and all corresponding regulations and OMB circulars. Pending [mal disposition of the appeal, CONTRACTOR shall act in accordance with CITY's decision unless the dispute involves a change order. XVII. BREACH - SANCTIONS If, through any cause, CONTRACTOR violates any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and/or prior agreements whereby grant funds were received by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, or if CONTRACTOR reports inaccurately or if any Audit Report makes disallowances, CONTRACTOR shall promptly remedy its acts or omissions and/or repay CITY all amounts due CITY as a result of CONTRACTOR's violation. For any such failures or violations, CITY shall also have the right at its sole discretion to either: (1) discontinue program support until 25N-13 Page 11 of 14 such time as CONTRACTOR fulfills its obligations or remedies all violations of this agreement or prior agreements; and/or (2) collect outstanding amounts as determined by CITY due CITY by offsetting or debiting from current claims or invoices, if after thirty (30) days' written notice CONTRACTOR has failed to repay same or a repayment schedule has not been made; and/or (3) terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to CONTRACTOR of such termination in accordance the notice provision in Paragraph XVIII herein below. XVIII. NOTICES All notices, reports and correspondence between the parties hereto respecting this Agreement shall be in writing and deposited in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: CITY: City of Santa Ana . . Manager, WIB Administrative Office 888 W. Santa Ana Blvd. #208 P.O. Box 1988, (M-73) Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 and, CLERK: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 telefacsimile (714) 647-6956 CONTRACTOR: Dr. Gregory Robinson Social Science Research Center California State University Fullerton 800 N. State College Blvd. MH 038C Fullerton, CA 92831 Tel. 714-278-2600 Fax: 714-278-2549 And Tanya Thompson, Acting Director Office of Sponsored Programs CSU Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation 2600 East Nutwood Ave., Ste 275 Fullerton, CA 92834-6850 Tel. 714-278-4113 Fax: 714-278-1256 25N-14 Page 12 of 14 XIX. MERGER This Agreement, together with the attachments hereto, expresses the total understanding of the parties. There are no oral understandings of the parties or terms and conditions other than as stated herein. xx. VALIDITY The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement. XXI. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indeI1111iiY City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn, b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WTINESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above- written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a municipal corporation of the State of California "CITYII By: David N. Ream City Manager Patricia E. Healy Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney "CONTRACTOR" . - .CSUFlJLLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION BY:/:t~ f ~ Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney By:td>A~ Name: William M. Dickerson Title: Executive Director Fed Tax ID #95-2081258 25N-15 Page 13 of14 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: '11 tUy] ~H Wad:;; Stephen G. ardmg -{flneputy City Manager for Development Services 25N-16 . Page 14 of 14 Exhibit A Proposal Number: _ REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Release Date October 16, 2007 . 8:00 A.M. RETURN ON ThTVESTMENT (RO!) STUDY - PHASE III OF LOCAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT SYSTEM FOR THE SANTA ANA WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD 888 W. Santa Ana Blvd. #208 P:O~Box-1-988-;-M~-3- Santa Ana, CA 92702 Phone (714) 565-2621 Email address:fiutzi(a)ci.santa-ana.ca.us 25N-17 INTRODUCTION The Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board (WIB)/Oversight and Data Committee and the Local Workforce Investment Area (L WIA) are issuing tl1is Request for Proposals (RFP) for an entity to conduct a Return on Investment (ROT) Study for Program Year 07-08 to study its Santa Ana Workforce Investment System. The WIB currently funds a comprehensive One-Stop Center, known as the Santa Ana WORK Center, hereinafter "One-Stop", located at 1000 E. Santa Ana Blvd., # 220, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The One- Stop is funded primarily by funds from the Workforce Investment Act and Wagner- Peyser Act. The WID would like a four-part study conducted to determine the ROT generated by the One-Stop's "universal access" customers who used the One-Stop at least one time during each quarter of PY07 -08 to look for employment and used one or more of the various services available at the One-Stop for universal access customers, The Will envisions the study following the same customers for four quarters while adding new customers each quarter. The One-Stop provides a variety of job search services from which these customers may pick and choose as they please to fit their individual needs. This study will look at the usage and success of those individual services. This study will be a follow-up to the Phase II study, which looked at universal customers and determined a ROI of 473%, The previous ROT studies can be viewed at \vww.santaanawib.com A maxi,'num amount of up to $20,000 has been earmarked for this study. The ROT study is to consist of: 1) four Quarterlv telephone surveys of a random selection of One-Stop customers who have used the One-Stop's service during the previous quarter; 2) four quarterlv progress reports to the Oversight and Data Committee; and 3) a [mal Report wl1ich includes the results of the telephone surveys and a ROT analysis to the WIB, It is anticipated that the Final ROT Report will be completed by December 31. 2008 and a presentation to the Board will be scheduled for January 2009, Quarterly participant data will be provided to the contractor for their random selection of customers for the telephone survey portion of this study. In addition the One-Stop will meet with the contractor to familiarize them with the services available at the One-Stop which the customers are free to access during their visits in order for the contractor to develop the survey tool. Additional meetings, interviews, etc. that may be deemed necessary by the selected contractor will be arranged as needed, 2 25N-18 PROJECTED TIME LINES Request for Proposal Issued Proposals Due Date Proposal Review Period Oversight and Data committee Review and Recommendation Proposal Approval Date by Vlrn 10/16/07 11/13/07 11/14/07 - 11/30/07 12/07/07 1/11/07 Proposal submittal and format: All proposals must be submitted by mail to the address below and mav be submitted bye-mail. If a proposer chooses not to submit a proposal via e-mail, then the proposer must submit 5 copies of the proposal (mail or hand delivered) with one orif!inal signature no later than November 13.2007, at 5:00 pm, If a proposer opts to submit a proposal bv e-mail. then only one original signed hard coPY of the proposal is required to be mailed to the address below.' Proposals submitted vIa e- mail must be e-mailed to Fran Jutzi at fi utzi (a>.ci ,santa-ana. ca.us by the due date. Proposals sent via e-mail must be in Microsoft Word format, spread sheets on Excel and all attachments or other documents must be downloadable with no special software needed, The complete proposal must be accessible via e-mail. Proposals submitted by e-mail must be VIRUS-FREE. Proposals that cannot be opened because of a VIRUS will be determined NON-RESPONSIVE AND NOT CONSIDERED FOR THIS PROCURMENT. If a submitted proposal has a virus and time permits, the proposer will be notified. If time permits, the proposer may deliver the required hard copies of the proposal by mail or hand as long as the proposal is received by the required deadline. An orif!inal signed hard cop" of each proposal submitted via email must also be mailed to: Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board, ROI Study Proposal Attn: Fran Jutzi 888 \V. Santa Ana Blvd., #208 (hand delivered) or P.O. Box 1988 - M73 (for mail), Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Proposals will not be accepted after 5 pm on the due date (11/13/07). If a proposal has been sent via em ail and accepted, the signed hard copy is due within 5 working days (11-19-07). Any questions regarding this Request for Proposal (RFP) may be directed to Fran Jutzi at (714) 565-2621. The WIB will not be responsible for proposals lost or delayed for any reason. 3 25N-19 STATEMENT OF \VORK In order for the ROI study to be meaningful, it needs to carefully study the relevant data and present objective results in a reader friendly fonnat. The resulting document will be utilized by the WIB members and staff to communicate the effectiveness of the workforce investment system in Santa Ana to elected officials both locally and in Washington DC and to the general public, The ROI study will become a marketing tool designed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of this system and provide an objective evaluation of the services offered by the One-Stop, TIns ROI study will need to review and analyze various typ€S of data gained by surveying a sample of customers who have visited the One-Stop to look for either work or training between the period of July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008. Each customer utilizes the One-Stop and its resources to varying degrees and with varying results and comes away with impressions of those services, Some customers will utilize the One- Stop's services several times before gaining employment while others may only visit once with varying degrees of satisfaction. It is these complexities that the WID wants the ROI study to focus on in Phase ill, The One-Stop offers a multitude of services provided by different partners as mandated by the Workforce Investment Act as well as each partner's own rules and regulations. Some of the partners at the One-Stop include: the State Employment Development Department, the Department of Rehabilitation, Orange County Social Services Agency, Goodwill Industries of O,c., and Santa Ana College. Services provided at the One-Stop include, but are notlimited to workshops, access to job orders via computer, postings on the job order board, want ads, usage of computers for job search, resume preparation and email access, and use of copy and fax machines. These services are provided to assist universal access customers in obtaining employment with very little staff help needed. If unfamiliar with the operations at the One-Stop, proposers may visit the WORK Center for a tour of the universal access services. Contact Gus Chamorro at 714-565-2629 to make arrangements. The One-Stop has a database, which includes the names, addresses, and phone numbers of all the customers who used the One-Stop during the study period. Customers without phone numbers will be deleted from the study, Additionally, the One-Stop will attempt to obtain base wage data for the sample selected that will provide the contractor with wages that can be used to evaluate pre-employment and post-employment wages of the selected customers during the study peliod. However the contractor should make every attempt to obtain said wage information directly from the customers. 4 25N-20 Return on Investment Study Final Product: 1) Typed quarterly reports for distribution to the Oversight and Data Committee. 2) A typed "final print ready" ROI study report with all appropriate graphs, charts and narrative, etc, needs to be submitted within 45 days of the end of the one-year study period. Note: If the proposal budget allows for it, 50 copies of the final report, bound and ready for distribution, would be needed. If not, the VlIB will produce the necessary copies once it receives the final ROI report. 3) All reports need to be submitted via e-mail as well. DEADLINES AND PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Timelines: · The study)s to. be completed by December 31, 2008. . The timeframe to be studied is July 1,2007 ilu"ough June 30, 2008 (4 quarters- 7- 1-07 to 9-30-07,10-01-07 to 12-31-07,1-1-08 to 3-31-08, and 4-1-08 to 6-30-08). It is expected that the proposer will need July 1,2008 to September 30, 2008 to conduct telephone surveys of the customers selected from the previous and final quarter and will use the remaining time to develop the data analysis and prepare the ROI report. · A presentation of the fmal resuIts, to the Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board at their January 2009 meeting, will be required, Incurred costs for Proposal: Neither the Santa Ana Will nor the Oversight and Data Committee are responsible for any costs incurred in the preparation of this proposal. Note: No equipment. furniture or software is to be purchased under this proposal unless approved by the WIB. Such items will be owned by the WIB and must be turned over to the WIB at the end of the study. REQUIRED PROPOSAL INFORMATION Proposals will be evaluated based on the completeness and responsiveness to all required components of this Request for Proposal (RFP) as listed below. THE COVER SHEET Must include: . Legal nan1e of organization, street address, mailing address if different, telephone number, fax number, federal tax identification number, state of incorporation, if applicable, and number of years in business. 5 25N-21 . Name of person(s), address and telephone and fax numbers of the local office or facility conducting the ROT Study. . The total amount of funds requested and the total number of hours estimated to provide the required services. Include a list of any extra charges, . A signed and dated statement affirming that this proposal is good for 120 days, that the organization has the knowledge and skills required to provide the required services as outlined in the Request for Proposal (RFP) , that the signer is duly authorized to sign and submit this proposal on behalf of the organization. If this proposal is selected, the signor must be able to enter into a contract with the Santa Ana WIB and meet additional contract requirements with regards to compliance with WIA regulations, as applicable, including patent rights, copyrights and rights to data, access to records and al.!di~ requirements, certifications of a drug free work place, debarment, lobbying, and liability insurance coverage, . BACKGROUND INFORMATION (Past/Comparable Performance) Must Include: . Summary of the organization's relevant experience and knowledge with regards to conducting Return on Investment (RO!) or related studies, experience conducting telephone surveys, general knowledge of the One-Stop center operations and its purpose and the Workforce Investment Act. . An attachment listing recent ROT or similar studies conducted by the organization. Include type of studies conducted, amount of contract, contract period, contact names, titles, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses, if available, of these entities. Letters of reference may be attached here as well. References may be contacted for the purpose of verifying past performance, . Relevant. information on proposer's organization including years in business, summary of past relevant experience, years in the field and areas of expertise as applicable. PROPOSAL DESIGN AND QUALITY Must Include: . A clearly defined plan to provide the services listed in the Statement Of Work. . fu1 outline of steps the organization will take to conduct the ROI study and who will be involved at each step along with a time line, Provide as much detail as needed to 6 25N-22 clearly describe activities to be conducted during the study. Provide a description of the call center and how it operates. . Clearly identify any assistance and or documentation that would be needed from WIB or One-Stop staff. COST REASONABLENESS Must include: . A schedule indicating all costs to be charged to this project. Costs are to be broken down based upon the various components of the project or it can be based on cost per hour however all expenses must. be included in the proposal. . The proposal will be considered a "firm offer" of services with prices guaranteed for no less than 120 days. EV ALUATION CRITERIA The Oversight and Data Committee (a sub-committee of the Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board) or other WIB members will review all proposals received by the deadline and which are determined to have met the minimal requirements as set forth in this Request for Proposal (RFP), Incomplete proposals, e-mail submittals with a detected virus and proposals submitted after the deadline will be judged to be non-responsive and will not be considered. Background Information (past/Comparable Performance) - 40 points Past experience, knowledge and effectiveness of the proposer/organization in providing the same or similar services as outlined in the Request for Proposal (RFP) will be evaluated to determine demonstrated performance and qualifications. Proposal Design and Quality - 40 points Overall design and scope of ROI study planned, ability to meet the required timelines, required steps needed to meet goals outlined in the Statement of Work, understanding of the objectives, and clearly defined outcomes and final product proposed. Cost Reasonableness - 20 points 7 25N-23. Proposal will be rated on cost effectiveness, costs which are judged reasonable, necessary, allowable, and allocable under \VIA, and competitiveness of costs with comparable proposals for similar services, GENERAL INFORMATION The WIB reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals received and to cancel in part or in its entirety this Request for Proposal (RFP), if it is in the best interest of the WIB to do so. This RFP does not commit the WIB or the Santa Ana City Council to award a contract or to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of the proposal. A proposer's acceptance of a copy of this RFP shall constitute knowledge and acceptance of all conditions contained herein, All proposals become the property of the WIB. The WIB incurs no ob.ligation to return or duplicate copies of the proposal for the .proposer. Failed Competition - If, after following all the procurement procedures, only one proposal is submitted - this is considered a failed competition. If two or more Request for Proposal (RFP)'s were issued and only one proposal was returned and the WID determines that the proposal is acceptable for funding, this is called a noncompetitive proposal (sole source). The justification for funding a proposal that resulted from a "failed cornpetitionll under the aforementioned circumstances would be "after solicitation of a number of sources, competition was determined inadequate,lI Appeal Process - If a proposer believes that any decision or denial of proposal was in violation of any applicable statute or regulation, the proposer may make a good faith complaint by submitting a letter delineating the complaint and referencing the actual violation v.rithin lO working days of the date of notification of the funding decision. The letter should be addressed to the Equal Opportunity Liaison (Lydia Morgan), Santa Ana WORK Center, 1000 E. Santa Ana Blvd, #200, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Contract Requirements - The organization/consultant selected for funding must enter into a contract with the City of Santa Ana and be willing to comply with WIA rules and regulations, as applicable and sign certifications regarding Drug-Free V/orkplace, Debarment and Lobbying, as well as provide liability insurance with the City of Santa Ana named as additional insurer for $1,000,000 (may be waived by city attorney). A boilerplate contact is included as part of the RFP package for your reference along with additional insured endorsement. See Exhibits "A" and "B". ATTACHMENTS: A boilerplate contract is attached for your infonnation along with the additional insuredtdocument the city requires when insurance is required of the proposer. 8 25N-24 ilFULd~RTON November 13,2007 Exhibit B Ms. Fran Jutzi Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board ROI Study Proposal 888 W. Santa Ana Blvd., #208 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 . Dear Ms. Jutzi: Please accept the following proposal to conduct the Return on Investment (ROI) Study- Phase III of Local Workforce Investment System for the Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board (WID) from the Social Science Research Center (SSRC) at California State University, Fullerton. The CSU Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation (formerly the CSUF Foundation), a 501 (c) 3 auxiliary organization, provides legal compliance and fiscal oversight for all University research grants and contracts. The contact information for the Auxiliary Services Corporation ASC) is: CSU Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation 2600 East Nutwood Ave., Ste 275 Fullerton, CA 92831 Te1. 714-278-3415 Fax: 714-278-4153 The Federal Tax Identification Number for the ASC is 95-2081258 and it is incorporated in California. The Foundation has been in business since 1959, Dr. Gregory Robinson, Director, Social Science Research Center will be conducting the Phase III ROI study. His contact information is as follows: Dr. Gregory Robinson Social Science Research Center California State University Fullerton 800 N. State College Blvd. MH 038C Fullerton, CA 92831 Tel. 714-278-2600 Fax: 714-278-2549 1 25N-25 The SSRC has approximately 20 years of experience designing, conducting, and analyzing research data for city, county, and state sponsors as well as local non-profit agencies in and around Orange County. We are particularly adept at producing comprehensive technical reports in prose easily understood by program staff, target populations, elected officials, and the general public, Our in-house staff is highly experienced at all aspects of survey research, Our location on the CSU Fullerton campus provides us with access to experts which will assist with the ROI portion of the study. Including indirect costs, calculated at 20%, the SSRC estimates Twenty Thousand ($20,000) dollars will be required for completion of the ROI project. It is estimated that the project will take 883 hours to complete. TIus proposal is valid for 120 days from the date first listed above, Califomia State Universi~y F~llerton has the knowledge and skills required to provide the required services as outlined in the Request for Prop.osal. William M, Dickerson, Executive Director, CSU Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation is duly authorized to sign and submit this proposal on behalf ofthe organization and is able to enter into a contract with the Santa Ana WIB and to meet additional contract requirements with regard to compliance with WIA regulations, as applicable, including patent rights, copyrights and rights to data, access to records and audit requirements, certifications of a drug free work place, debarment, lobbying, and liability insurance coverage, If an award is made for this proposed project, we would appreciate your sending a notification to this office with the grant awarded through our non-profit, tax exempt CSU, Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation. The Auxiliary Services Corporation has been established and incorporated to assist the University in administering the various research grants, contracts and awards funded to this institution. We would be pleased to forward the Foundation's articles of incorporation and bylaws should you desire further information. Please notify this office of any action taken on this proposal. Your thoughtful consideration of this application is appreciated, Sincerely, William M. Dickerson Executive Director CSU Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation KT:ndr Enclosures cc: Dr. Gregory Robinson, Principal Investigator Dr. Thomas Klammer, College of Humanities Social Science 2 25N-26 r:~f; C A L 5 TAT E II FULLERTON l}Jficc of Grant, [~ Cmltracls (7141 278-210t. I fa>: (714', 278-3000 November 13. 2007 Ms. Fran Jutzi Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board ROl Study Proposal 888 W. Santa Ana Blvd., #208 Santa Ana" CA 92702-1988 Dear Ms. lutzi: . Please accept the following proposal from the Social Science Research Center (SSRC) at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF) to conduct the Return on Investment (ROI) Study - Phase III of Local Workforce Investment System for the Santa Ana \Vorkforce Investment Board (WIB). Dr. Gregory Robinson, Director, Social Science Research Center 'will be conducting the Phase III ROI study, His contact information is as follows: Dr. Gregory Robinson Social Science Research Center California State University Fullerton 800 N. State College Blvd. MH 038C Fullerton, CA 92831 Tel. 7] 4-278-2600 Fax: 714-278-2549 The SSRC has approximately 20 years of experience designing, conducting, and analyzing research data for city, county, and state sponsors as well as local non-profit agencies in and around Orange County. We are particularly adept at producing comprehensive technical reports in prose easily understood by program staff, target populations, elected officials, and the general public. Our in-house staff is highly experienced at all aspects of survey research. Our location on the CSU Fullerton campus provides us with access to experts which will assist with the ROI portion of the study. Including indirect costs, calculated at 20%, the SSRC estimates Twenty Thousand ($20,000) dollars 'will be required for completion of the ROI project. It is estimated that the project will take 883 hours to complete. This proposal is valid for 120 days from the date fIrst listed above. California State University Fullerton has the knowledge and skills required to provide the required services as outlined in the Request for Proposal. CUIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON P.O. Bo:': 685C\ FulJenon, CA 92834-6850 ::::~n~:~:k.;:]c :S~:,;:~,~::~:;;::i;'on~::::!Si~:i~;'n~;:~;~ ,~ ~:::):,::~:~'5JJ~~:7,:",,:;~~,::,~:,::).!t.:::: ~'~:':~l::~,l~.:s~;::' j,::::~';~5t., s:.~':~:'.~:::~" s~,:~::~,;; The undersigned is duJy authorized to sif:,'1l and submit this proposal on behalf of the CSUF. If an award is made for this proposed project, please send a notification to the CSUF Office of Grants and Contracts at the address provided below. In addition, and in accordance with University policy, the awardee should be named as CSU Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation (ASe). The ASC is a 501 (c) 3 auxiliary organization which has been established and incorporated to assist the University in administering the various research grants, contracts and cooperative agreements awarded to the CSUF, Upon request, we will provide you with the Articles of lncorporation for the ASC. The Federal Tax Identification Number for the ASC is 95-2081258 and is incorporated in Califorrila, with address at: 2600 East Nutwood Ave., Ste 275 Fullerton, CA 9283 ] Tel. 7]4-278-34]5 Fax: 7J 4-278-4] 53 The ASC will be able to enter into a contract with the Santa Ana \VIE and to meet additional contract requirements with regard to compliance with \VIB regulations, as applicable, including patent rights, copyrights and rights to data, access to records and audit requirements, certifications of a drug free work place, debarment, lobbying, and liability insurance coverage. Please notify this office of any action taken on this proposal. Your thoughtful consideration of this application is appreciated. 0'" ''------_." '} I /~. ,'/ / i' ~.. ". !L--/ ------r-- J _. -. /' {:1(..A,-i\~.Fr--}' -' , Sincer~ly, , /' . "'----/ L~ .' ,'. /l "~7'~~:' 7 i,__l/' ../... "'. ..../. \ -'~\' ~ L./ Linda W. Panon Director, Office of Grants and Contracts Enclosures cc: Dr. Gregory Robinson, Principal Investigator Dr. Thomas Klammer, College of Humanities Social Science 2 25N-28 SANTA ANA '''IB PHASE III RETURN ON INVESTMENT STUDY BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Social Science Research Center (SSRC) at Califonua State University, Fullerton, has extensive experience functioning as a data collection entity in a variety of survey research endeavors. The SSRC operates a 24-station computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) network, active in Orange County for 20 years. We can produce an accurate and comprehensive dataset in a relatively short period of time by conducting interviews during days, evenings and weekends to optimize contact with the target population. We have conducted numerous telephone surveys targeting service utilization populations such as CalY{ORKs participants, as well as geographically concentrated ethnic populations including Latinos, Vietnamese,' Armenians and Koreans. The SSRC completed the telephone survey work supporting the SA WID's 2005 Phase II ROI study. The SSRC is intimately familiar with workforce development resulting from the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 and has provided research support to administrators and educators in this area for a decade. The proposed team pairs the SSRC's expertise in applied survey research with expert consultation from the independent consultant, Dr. Rajeev Sane with whom we worked in 2005. Under Dr. Robinson's direction, the Social Science Research Center has conducted the California Cooperative Occupational Information System (CCOIS) Labor Market Surveys for nine years, including work in Orange and Monterrey Counties and in the North Bay Counties region managed by Napa County. Other survey projects designed to assess service use and the effectiveness of those services are a 1999 Transportation Needs Assessment Survey for Los Angeles County with randomly selected GAIN participants extracted from DPSS files. In addition, the SSRC conducted a 2002 surveywith County of Orange CalWORKs recipients to determine their child care needs and impediments to utilizing available child care subsidies. Most recently, a study was conducted for the Chief Administrative Office, Service Integration Branch, County of Los Angeles on sanctioned CalWORKs participants. Appendix A contains a list of references, The Social Science Research Center has a long history with California's One-Stop Career Centers, Upon California's receipt of a One-Stop Planning Grant in the fan of 1994, the State Job Training Coordinating Council appointed a Task Force to oversee the one-stop planning process, Seven technical work teams were selected to address issues and make recommendations to the Task Force who then made recommendations to the Governor. One of the seven teams appointed by the Task Force is the Electronic Infrastructure Work Team (EIWT). The EIWT, under the direction of the Office of Workforce Policy, contracted with CSU to gather the necessary research material in order for the EIWT to develop the California Electronic One-Stop Infrastructure (EOSI) model. .., .J 25N-29 Dr. Robinson participated on the multi-'campus CSU team that conducted a feasibility study and recommended a roll-out plan for an information infrastructure to support the One-Stop System, CSU researched both available and emerging technologies and compiled first hand inforn1ation from persons who were using those technologies. The results of this study were used by the Electronic Infrastructure Work Team to develop its final recommendations. As part of this effort, the CSU team conducted focus groups with prospective One-Stop customers, and synthesized inforn1ation on their existing systems' capabilities, to help guide decision-making on the design of the infonnation infrastructure. EXPERlENCE Gregory Rob~ns~n, Ph.D. Dr. Robinson is the Director of the SSRC. Dr. Robinson's expertise includes applied research and evaluation design, survey research methods, and qualitative approaches to data collection and analysis. He has'successfully conducted over one hundred applied research and evaluation projects for county and state entities with foci in community issues, employment, education, health care, and criminal justice, He has provided extensive consultation to the Latino and Vietnamese communities of Southern California. Prior to joining the SSRC, Dr. Robinson was a Research Associate at the Public Policy Research Institute at UC Irvine. Greg holds a Ph.D, in social ecology from the University of California at Irvine and an undergraduate degree in psychology from the University of California at Berkeley. Rajeev C. Sane, Ph.D., MBA Dr. Sane worked for seven years in the Strategy and Corporate Planning Group at Unocal Corporation. In that capacity, he conducted several ROI analyses for a variety of large and small capital investment projects. For the past four years, he has been an independent management consultant. His clients have included ChevronTexaco, Conoco Phillips, House of Blues, and Northern Trust. Rajeev obtained his undergraduate degree from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi; a Ph.D. from the University of Southern California; and an MBA from the University of California, Los Angeles. STUDY DESIGN - UNIVERSAL ACCESS CUSTOMER SURVEY The special strengths of the SSRC are our methodological approaches to questionnaire construction, pre-testing the survey instrument (pilot testing), language capabilities, sample design, data collection, data analysis, and technical report preparation. Questionnaire construction, pilot testing, language capabilities, sampling, and data analysis and report preparation, are discussed below. Our scientific approach to data collection is detailed in Appendix B. 4 25N-30 Questionnaire Construction and Pilot Testing The SSRC is highly experienced at translating the information needs of decision-makers to survey instrumentation. The process of developing a survey instrument for the Phase III study will be greatly accelerated because of this experience and the instrument developed by the SSRC in collaboration with the SA WID to support the Phase II ROI study, Working with relevant progran1 staff, the SSRC will design a questiOlmaire to confirm the services and resources used by universal access customers, their preceding employment status, their satisfaction with WORK center services and the employment and wage outcomes associated with their use of the services/resources. A variety of demographic information will also be collected. Our location close to the Santa Ana WORK Center will facilitate meetings during this process and throughout the study, if necessary, It is imperative that the contractor selected to collect these data~carefully measure the duration and intensity of service use at the WORK Center. Using this "dose- response" covariate for outcome measures is necessary to adequately explain outcomes. One would not expect the casual user to obtain the same outcomes as someone who visited the WORK Center often and/or used a number of different services and resources. Use of a covariate quantifying the duration and intensity of service utilization will add accuracy and clarity to outcomes assessment. The survey questionnaire will confirm the frequency of service utilization including, but not limited to, WORK shops, computer access to job orders, hard copy po stings on the job order board, want ads, provision of computer time for job searches, resume preparation, email access, use of basic business machines, and use of free outgoing mail for resume submission. Pre- and post- wages will be collected by self-report, which can be compared to the base wage data provided by the WORK Center. The SSRC pre-tests survey instruments prior to initiating full-scale data collection. All supervisorial and interviewing staff working on a project are trained using a paper-and- pencil version of the survey. Each question is read aloud and staff are paired to practice the survey instrument on the CA TI system. After this hands-on practice, the instrument may be refined to improve comprehensiveness, flow, length and factors that influence respondent cooperation and interest. Surveys are conducted with approximately 25 to 30 . respondents. Supervisors and SSRC management-level staff then conduct a "debriefing," which allows interviewers to discuss the overall progression of survey item sequencing as well as to comment on specific survey items that may have been unclear to survey respondents. Before the next interviewing shift, SSRC personnel review the pilot test frequencies and share these data with the survey sponsor. If the staff debrief or frequencies review suggests modifications, the instrument is quickly revised and reprogrammed into CATI software before interviewing continues. 5 25N-31 Language Capabilities We provide multicultural research strategies as appropriate. We find the literal translation of English instrumentation to be insufficient, and we emphasize the development of linguistically and culturally appropriate research instruments and methods. We regularly conduct research in the Latino and Vietnamese communities, and have conducted surveys in Korean, Cambodian, Armenian, Tagalog, and Mandarin. Our university setting allows us to access the linguistic and cultural expertise of members of many racial/ethnic and national groups, The Cal State Fullerton campus affords access to a broad range of faculty expertise and student perspectives, representing many etlmic backgrounds and heritages. Translated surVey instruments are programmed into Ci3 scripting software that interfaces with the CA TI sYl>tem, This allows interviewers conducting English and non-English language surveys to read the questions on the screen and type verbatim responses into the CA TI system. Procedures for handling these open-ended text responses are discussed in Appendix B, Sample Design A confidence interval for survey data refers to the level of precision required for estimates of population parameters based upon sample data, A generally accepted standard for policy-relevant research is a confidence interval of plus or minus five percent. When this standard is met, we can be 95% confident that the true population parameter lies within an interval extending five percent above and below any proportion derived from survey (sample) data. A population paranleter is the result one would obtain if all universal access customers were interviewed. Sampling error, as indexed by the confidence interval around reported proportions, varies in relation to sample size and to the variability of survey responses (among other factors). In general, as the sample grows larger, the confidence interval grows na..rrower. That is, inferences about population parameters based upon larger samples are more precise (are associated with narrower confidence intervals) than inferences based upon smaller samples, Also, as the proportion of some attribute in the sample (e.g, overall satisfaction with the Santa Ana WORK Center) approaches a fifty/ fifty split, (say, 50% are dissatisfied and 50% are satisfied) sampling error increases, resulting in a wider confidence interval. Conversely, sampling error decreases as the proportion of a given attribute approaches a five/ ninety-five split, (5% are dissatisfied and 95% are satisfied) resulting in a more precise estimate and a narrower confidence interval. Assuming a population of unique Universal Access customers of roughly 5,000 in the program year under study, the table on the following page depicts the required sample sizes for three confidence intervals: 1) Calculated leniently, that is, based upon the 6 25N-32 presumption of a five/ ninety-five split in the sample data, 2) Calculated presuming a twenty-five/ seventy-five proportion, and 3) Calculated most conservatively, which is based upon the presumption of a fifty/ fifty proportion in the survey data, S I P I . (N ampe opu atlOD =5,000) 5/95 25/7 5 50/50 Required Sample Size 75 283 370 To achieve a confidence interval of plus or minus 5%, interviews must be completed with a minimum of370 unique clients. If Santa Ana WID desires to make comparisons between customers based on racial/ethnic category, education level, industry sector or some other factor, however, a larger sample will provide.more robust estimates of t4e?e sub-groups. Due to the high proportion of Hispanic/Latino clients served by the WORK Center, we recommend a total of 400 interviews with English and Spanish-speaking universal access customers approximately proportionate to their distribution in the . population of all universal access customers. The specific sample design will be confirmed with WID staff, but the place holder is to conduct telephone interviews with a separate set of 100 unique clients each quarter, and to conduct follow-up interviews with subsets of clients interviewed in previous quarters as funds permit. Data Analysis and Report Production The SSRC utilizes appropriate statistical techniques to analyze both quantitative and qualitative data. Dr. Robinson instructs graduate and undergraduate courses in statistics and research methods for the CSUF psychology and sociology departments, respectively. By maintaining this link to the instructional mission of the University, he stays abreast of the latest statistical and methodological advances, In addition to our highly trained and experienced staff, as a University-based research center, the SSRC has access to scholars active in their respective fields that can provide a wide range of expert consultation. SSRC researchers are skilled at presenting analytic results in a practitioner-friendly format to ensure accessibility to a wider audience. For instance, all tabular and graphical data are preceded by interpretive text that direct the reader's attention to the most salient aspects of the analysis. To ensure a final report that meets Sai1ta Ana WIB's needs, a draft report will be circulated for feedback. 7 25N-33 STUDY DESIGN - RETURN ON INVESTMENT ANALYSIS We propose to obtain annual pre- and post-salary infomlation from the target population during telephone survey administration to more accurately estimate the ROI for this group of users. It is possible that because the WORK Center provides free placement services, a pOIiion of the recipients that make use of the Center would not have gone to any other placement center had the WORK Center not existed, We propose including the additional tax revenue generated from this group of people in the overall economic benefit estimated for the program. Any benefit provided to both the Center users and the government accrues over time because individuals, on average, r~tain their jobs for multiple ye~rs, Therefore, our ROT calculations will capture estimated economic benefits to the government from taxes paid to date over the term of their employment. To derive this estimate, respondents will be queried as to the length oftheir employment since using WORK Center services or resources, DOCUMENTATION NEEDED The SSRC requests the entire universal access customer database for each quarter in the Program Year (July 1 2007 to June 30 2008) as we anticipate that not all numbers will be valid (e,g., disconnects resulting from phone number changes). To produce the ROT report, the SSRC team will require total funds provided to the Santa Ana WORK Center during Program Year 2007-2008 as well as estimates of in-kind or time donations provided by partner agencies, TIMELINE Assuming an approval date of January 11, 2008, the SSRC and its collaborative partners (Ph.D. level staff) will immediately begin working with Santa Ana WORK Center and Will staff to develop a questionnaire for telephone survey administration. TIllS should be accomplished by February 15,2008. Once finalized, it will be progra.'11111ed in-house using Ci3 CATI software, A sample of unique clients utilizing the One Stop from 7-1-07 to 9-30-07, and from 10-01-07 to 12-31-07 would be drawn ilmnediately, and interviews would commence ASi\P in March, 2008. Interviews for the sample selected in the 1-1- 08 to 3-31-08 quarter will commence in April, 2008, and interviews for the 4-1-08 to 6- 30-08 quarter would commence in July, 2008. During data collection, relevant financial data will be obtained and report preparations will COlmnence. A draft ROI report will be circulated for feedback two to three weeks prior to December 31, 2008 to allow WID staff to comment. One or more representatives from the SSRC's team will be available to present study results to the Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board in January 2009. 8 25N-34 COST ESTIMATE The fixed price quoted belov.' inclUdes all expenses related to the perfonnance of work and services required to provide the Santa Ana WIB with a final ROI report.Plicing is based upon cost per interview and the associated costs for materials and support for project personnel as detailed below. Costs have been calculated based on an average English-language interview length often minutes, Description Hours Cost Ph.D, Level Oversight and Report Preparation 13.0 $975,00 Ph,D. Level Consultation and Report Preparation 40.0 . . $4,00.00 Telephone Interviewing Costs (Includes training, 800.0 $10,080,00 interviewing, and telephone costs) Administrative Assistant 30.0 $624 Telephone, Supplies, Other Direct Costs $988.00 Total Direct Costs $16,667,00 University Indirect Costs (iiJ 20% $3,333.00 Total Budeet $20,000.00 9 25N-35 APPENDIX A 10 25N-36 REFERENCES "Santa Ana \VIB Phase II Return on Investment Study" Fran Iutzi 888 W. Santa Ana Blvd., #208 Santa Ana, CA 92702 "California Cooperative Occupational Information System (CCOIS) Labor Market Surveys" Janice Jump Research Analyst Special Programs . Housing and Community Services 1300 S. Grand Ave., Bldg B, 3rd Floor Santa lilla, CA 92705 Tel (714) 567-7414 "Transportation Needs Assessment 1999 Survey for Los Angeles County" "Sanctioned CalWORKs 2005 Participants Survey" Manuel H. Moreno, Ph.D, Research Director Research and Evaluation Services Service Integration Branch Chief Administrative Office 222 S, Hill Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel (213) 974-5849 "Orange County Social Services Agency 2002 CalWORKs Child Care Needs Assessment and Utilization Survey" Elaine Hall, Deputy Director Economic and Community Partnerships 888 N. Main Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Tel (714) 541-7859 11 25N-37 APPENDIX B 12 25N-38 TECHNICAL APPROACH TO DATA COLLECTION The SSRC's computer assisted telephone interviewing (CA TI) software and standard operating procedures ensure a superior response to issues of response bias, callbacks, quality control, and the verification of data entry procedures essential for all telephone survey research endeavors. These are discussed in detail below. Response Bias Response bias is a major source of sampling error that can be minimized by preserving the random nature of the selected sample. By attempting sample records that result in a busy, no answer, or answering machine disposition up to 20 times, a representative . sample of WORK Center "Core A" or universal acces~ cust~mers that used the Center between July 1,2003 and June 30, 2004 will be surveyed. Up to 20 attempts at contact are also made for any sample record known to connect to a residential household, such as requests to phone the individual another time/day. These "callbacks" are explained in the next section. Callbacks The CA TI system includes a sophisticated call tracking and callback scheduling procedure. A call history is developed for each number and remains active until a final disposition is assigned. 1fno contact is made, the call record will note the time of day and the interviewer who attempted the call, The call will then be automatically reassigned at a later time based upon an algorithm that reduces the probability that the call will come up again on the same day and time. When a contact is made, but the interview is not completed, call information is recorded that includes whether a callback has been scheduled, who the interviewer spoke with, and the current disposition ofthe call (for example, immediate refusal, answering machine, mid-interview tennination, etc.), In addition, the time of each call, the number of call attempts, and any interviewer-generated notes are recorded, For multi-lingual studies such as this, records with phone numbers known to connect to a Spanish-speaking household (generally established by a prior call attempt) are dispositioned accordingly and automatically routed to an interviewer with that language capability, If no linguistically competent interviewer is available, the system holds the record until such an interviewer is free. The CA TI system allows the researcher to set the number oftimes a telephone number is to be called before it is retired. SSRC standard operating procedure dictates 20 attempts at contact. If contact is not established after 20 calls, the number is transferred to a holding queue. Our policy regarding immediate refusals is to call back at random intervals after the initial refusal. Experience shows that about 30% of initial refusals can be converted simply by contacting the individual another day. Our procedure for 13 25N-39 converting refusals by respondents whose eligibility has been established involves two steps, After the first refusal, we call back at a different time. We ask for the eligible respondent, beginning by apologizing for bothering them again, and subsequently attempting to explain the scientific reason for our interest in speaking with them. This procedure converts about 20% ofrefusals lmown to be eligible for the survey. If this results in a second refusal, we will try one additional time using a "please help" approach. This generally yields a conversion rate of 10%, After three refusals, the telephone number is retired and classified accordingly. This procedure is a modification of Dillman's (1978) Total Design Method. Our response rates for listed sample survey projects such as this generally exceed 65% and supports precise inferences from the sample to the population. Quality Control and Verification of Data EntlT Procedures Data entry and consistency-checking features of CA TI software, real-time random monitoring of interviews in progress by SSRC shift supervisors, and daily review of the data collected ensure high quality information that accurately depicts respondents' answers to survey questions, Survey questions and response options appear on a computer screen while the interviewer is speaking to the respondent. Data are entered directly into the CATI system, which will not accept out-of-range response options, so recording errors are reduced. In addition, range and validity checks can be programmed to minimize other recording and survey administration errors (e.g, verifying the number of jobs reported, whether income from day labor was received, and the wages associated with each). In addition to these technical features, SSRC supervisors are present during all interviewing shifts. Each of our supervisors previously worked as an interviewer, and each has been trained in telephone interviewing techniques and methodological considerations. Random call-monitoring is perfonned during each shift to verify the accuracy of the data. Clients can connect to this call-monitoring system from an off- campus telephone number, allowing them to listen as data are collected. Our 24-station CATI lab enables us to collect data quickly and our export function allows for the rapid extraction ofresults into numerous fOID1ats, including ASCII, SPSS, and SAS fonnats. The resulting quantitative data and open-ended text responses are reviewed daily so that interviewing staff cawbe "debriefed" regarding vague or imprecise data, This is done throughout the life of the proj ecl. 14 25N-40 Coding of Open-Ended Text . In addition to numeric data associated with "fixed response" survey items, text responses may be collected during CA TI surveys in response to "other," "specify," and "open- ended" prompts. "Other" text responses are generated when coding categories are insufficient to capture a given survey response. For example, standard coding categories for respondent race/ ethnicity may not include an option for "Middle Eastem." "Specify" responses are used to elaborate or add dimension to a quantitative answer. such as asking respondents to specify the web site visited after indicating that they used the Intemet while visiting the WORK Center. The last category, "open-ended," does not have a numeric basis of any kind, CA TI software allows interviewing staff to record verbatim responses for these tmee types of open-ended questions. In advance of project completion, coding categories are developed by project managers and approved by the director; these proposed coding categories can be circulated to and approved by the appropriate WIB staff. Ci3 software allows up to 30 codes for each answer. Multiple codes are necessary when questions specifically ask for multiple answers such as, "What two or tmee resources or services used at the WORK Center were most helpful in your employment search?" and are useful in many other circumstances. As additional surveys are completed, the preliminary categories are revisited to ensure that they represent respondents' answers, Using the final coding schema, SSRC researchers will assign numeric codes to the open- ended text responses. These will be merged with the quantitative data to produce a fmal SPSS (or other fOID1at) database for analysis, 15 25N-41 COMPLAINT HANDLING UNDER THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT SANTA ANA WIA Santa Ana Local Workforce Investment Area July 1, 2001 25N-42 Exhibit C Table of Contents I. I nformation Regarding Complaints......................... ................................................................... 2 A. Nondiscrimination and Equ ai Opportunity Complaints.......................................................... 2 1 . Poli cy State ment....... ..... ................ ..' .. ....... ....... ............ . .. . ...... .... . ..' ... . ..' . . . ... . .. . :....... .. . ... ... 2 2. Civil Rig hts ................ .......... ... ......... .. ..... .. ..... ..' ... ..' ... .... ...... ... ...... .... . . . . . .. . ... . ........ . .... .. . .. .... 3 3. Nondiscrimination Laws under WI A ........ ............ .. .... ..... ............ ............... .. . ..... .. ....... ........ 4 4. How to File Your Complaint.... ................................................................. ......................:... 5 . B. Crimi nal Complaints .............................................................................................................. 6 II. General Procedures for Handling Non-Criminal Violations of the Act ....................................... 6 III. Procedures for Handling Complaints at the S OA Level............................................................. 8 IV. Proced u res for Handling Campi a i nts at the State Level.......................................................... 13 V. proced u res for H and ling 0 iscri mi nation Com pi a ints by P a rti cipa nts.... ..... ...... .. .. .. .... .. ......... ... 15 VI. Procedures for Handling Handicap Complaints by Participants.............................................. 16 GLOSSARY OF WIA TERMS. ................. ............ ............ ............. ....................... .......... .............. 18 1 25N-43 l. Information Regarding Complaints A, Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity Complaints 1. Policy Statement In carrying out the purpose of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), the City of Santa Ana Local Workforce Investment Area (LWIA) will establish programs to prepare youth and unskilled adults for entry into the labor force and to afford - job training to those individuals facing serious barriers to employment. Every effort will be made to provide services necessary for eligible individuals to obtain productive employment. In implementing WIA. all contractors in the Santa Ana LWIA \ViII foster equal opportunity and non-discrimination, as provided in State and Federal equal opportunity and non-discrimination laws including, but not limited to: . . Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 . Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 . The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended . Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 . Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 . Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 . Section 188 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 In keeping with our commitment, no individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied benefits of, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment, in the administration or of in connection with any WIA funded program because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or political affiliation or belief, ' Participation in programs and activities financially assisted in whole or in part under WIA shall be open to citizens and nationals of the United States, lawfully admitted permanent resident aliens, lawfully admitted refugee, parolees, and other individuals authorized by the Attorney General to work in the United States. No individual will be intimidated, threatened, coerced, or discriminated against because of filing a complaint, furnishing information, or assisting or participating in any manner in an investigation, compliance review, hearing, or . any other activity related to the administration of WIA. 2 25N-44 Administration responsibility for this Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action (EO/AA) Program is delegated to the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Officer for the Santa Ana Local Workforce Investment Area. Equal opportunity and non-discrimination, however, will only be achieved through leadership and implementation of a viable Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity program. 2, Civil Rights No one applying for or enrolled in the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Programs may. be discriminated against because of race, color, creed, . handicap, national origin, sex, age, political affiliation, or beliefs, This means that - for any of the characteristics listed above: You may not be denied the opportunity to enroll in WIA. No benefits or services may be denied you for discrimrnatory reasons. You may not be segregated or treated any differently from other applicants or participants, while you are being registered, interviewed, counseled or tested; or while you are working or attending classes as part of the program. You must be provided an equal chance to use all facilities available in the program. Fair employment practices must ,be provided to all staff with regard to recruiting, hiring, transferring, promotions, training, compensation, benefits,layoff, and termination. You have the right to make a complaint if you feel you have been denied any of the above opportunities. You cannot in any way be penalized for filing a complaint. Your WIA sponsor has established a mechanism for handling complaints or grievances. Your complaint must be filed within 180 days. All complaints will be handled confidentially, 3 25N-45 3, Nondiscrimination Laws under WIA Title VI of the Civil Riqhts Act of 1964 Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or religion. The Aqe Discrimination Act of 1975 Prohibits arbitrary discrimination against persons age 40-70. The Rehabilitation Act of f 1973 Prohibits disc'rimination based on handicpP, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 Prohibits discrimination in any education or training program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS: Title VII of the Civil Riqhts Act of 1964 Prohibits discrimination in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in all terms and conditions of employment and establishes the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as the administrative agency. White House Executive Order No, 11246 as Amended b I Executive Order No. 11375 Creates the office of Federal Contract Compliance and prohibits discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, or national origin, Department of Labor Secretary's Order no. 4-73 Prohibits discrimination based on sex. Equal Pav Act of 1963 Prohibits pay differential solely because of sex. 4 25N-46 - Emerqencv Emplovment Act of 1971 Prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, national origin, political affiliation, or beliefs. 4 How to File Your Complaint a. Put your complaint in writing. b, Have it sworn to before a notary public, if possible. c. Provides details that tell what happened, where it happened, and when it happened. d, Give the name and addre.sse.s of all persons who were present or who had anything to do with the matter. .. .Complaints on the basis of race, COIOf. or national origin, age. sex, religion. political affiliation or belief. retaliation and citizenship, must be filed vJithin 180 days of the alleged occurrence directly with: Director Civil Rights Center U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-4123 200 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, D,C. 20210 Complaints on the basis of handicap must be filed within 180 days of the alleged occurrence, These complaints must be filed directly with the WIA administrative entity, The WIA administrative entity shall issue a written decision within 30 days of the filing of the complaint. Ifthe complaint is still unresolved, an appeal may be made to the Chief of State Workforce Investment Division Office. The Department of Labor, the Civil Service Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. and many other offices and agencies are committed to assuring equal employment opportunities for all persons. They will protect you. A case may be taken to court if the other processes do not yield satisfactory results. You may hire your own lawyer, or if you cannot afford one, the court may appoint one for you, 5 25N-47 . It is unlawful for an employer, union, or employment agency to punish you or any witness for attempting to present the facts in a case. YOUR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT Santa Ana Local Workforce Investment Area 1000 E. Santa Ana Blvd" Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 565-2600 B. Criminal Complaints In accordance with the WIA (P.L. 105-200) and the implementing code of Fed.eral section 667.600.... Federal handling of criminal complaints and report.offraud, abuse and other criminal activity. "All information and complaints involving fraud, abuse or other criminal activity shall be reported directly and immediately to the City of Santa Ana and the Secretary of Labor," II. General Procedures for Handling Non-Criminal Violations of the Act The following procedure is promulgated to meet the requirements of Title 20, of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 667.600 through 667,640 of the WIA regulations, and Section 181 (c) of the Act (Public Law 105.200: 29 U.S. Code Sec. 2931 et seq.) at the State and LWIA level for the receipt, investigation, hearing, and resolution of complaints by WIA participants, subrecipients, applicants for participation, or financial assistance, labor unions, community based organizations, or any other persons, These procedures provide for resolution of non-criminal complaints arising from the operation of the Santa Ana L WIA. A complaint is defined here as a written expression by a party alleging a violation of the Act, regulations promulgated under the Act, recipient grants, subagreements, or other specific agreements under the Act, including terms and conditions of employment of such participants in employment training programs. All complaints, amendments and withdrawals shall be in writing. These procedures are intended to resolve matters which concern policies, procedures or action(s) arising in connection with WIA programs operated by each LWIA grant recipient and subrecipient under the Act. These procedures shall not be construed as affecting any other available legal remedy outside of the WIA complaint process (i,e" disputes regarding terms and conditions of employment of any employee who is not a participant), either separately or simultaneously, that a person may wish to pursue in the resolution of a non-WIA complaint. Also, these procedures do not restrict the LWIA grant recipient staff in carrying out informal discussion 6 25N-48 procedures do not restrict the LWiA grant recipient staff in carrying out informal discussion and resolution of any problems outside of and without resort to the formal complaint procedure, A, The following principles and rules apply to all complaints at all steps of the complaint procedures: 1. All complaints must be made in writing within 180 days of the alleged occurrence, except complaints alleging fraud or criminal activity. 2. All persons filing a complaint shall be free from restraint, coercion, reprisal, or discrimination, Good faith efforts shall be made to informally resolve the complaint prior to the scheduled heari~g. Complainants have the right to withdraw their complaints (in writing) at any time prior to the heaFing, A complainant may amend his/her complaint to correct technical deficiencies but not to add issues. 3. Complainants shall have the right to be represented at their own expense by . person(s) of their choosing at all levels ofthe complaint process. 4. Upon enrollment into employment or training, participants shall be provided with a written description of these procedures, including notification of their right to file complaints and instructions for filing, An employer of participants, including private-for-profit employers of participants, may use this or other complaint resolution procedures so long as the participant is informed of the complaint resolution procedure they are to follow and the time frames governing review of complaints are met. A "participant", within the meaning of these procedures, is an individual who receives employment-training services under q program funded by Santa Ana LWIA. The Complaint Resolution Procedures contained herein (or the alternative procedures which an employer may use) shall be available to participants to resolve disputes regarding items and conditions of employment of such participants in employment training programs. However. such rocedures shall not be used to resolve dis utes re ardin terms and conditions of em 10 ment of an em 10 ee who is not a artici ant. as defined herein. 5. If a complaint does not receive a decision at the LWIA grant recipient level within 60 days of filing the complaint or receives an unsatisfactory decision, the complainant then has a right to request a review of the complaint by the Governor, 7 , 25N-49 6. Complainants must initially file and exhaust LVVIA grant recipient/hearing procedures prior to appealing to the State except where the State determines that the LVVIA grant recipient's procedures are not in compliance with the State's procedures. III. Procedures for Handling Complaints at the LWiA Level A. Receipt of Complaints Pursuant to the WIA regulations f.ound at 20 CFR, Section 667,600, the L WIA administrative entities have the responsibility to conduct hearings and resolve complaints made by individuals about the administration of programs in the LWIA, "LWIA ~eve\': encompasses LWIA administrative entity and employers to which the administrative entity has delegated the complaint resolution process, The following comprise the guidelines for resolving issues arising in connection with WIA programs operated by the Santa Ana L WIA including resolutions of complaints arising from actions! such as audit disallowances or the imposition of sanctions taken by the Governor with respect to audit findings, investigations or monitoring reports, 1, Form and Filing of Complaint Official filing date of the complaint is the date the written complaint is received, The filing of the complaint with the Santa Ana LWIA Equal Employment Opportunity Offtcer shaH be considered as a request for hearing and a decision must be issued within 60 days, The complaint must be in writing and must be signed and dated, The complaint should also contain the following information: a. Full name, telephone number, if any, and mailing address of the complainant; b. Full name, telephone number, and mailing address of the agency involved (respondent); c. Clear and concise statement of facts including dates constituting alleged violation; d. What provisions under the Act, regulations, grant or other agreements under the Act, are believed to have been violated; e. Remedy sought by the complainant; and f. If the complainant is a private or public entity or corporation, and not a natural person,the filing of the complaint must be duly authorized by the governing body of such entity or corporation. 8 25N-50 The absence of any of the requested information shall not be a basis for dismissing the complaint. A copy of the complaint must be sent to the respondent and both parties notified of the opportunity for an informal resolution. At each step of the complaint process, the complainant must be notified in writing of the next procedural step, 2. I nformal Conference Informal conferences will be utilized by the Santa Ana LWIA to resolve complaints: however, such informal conferences shall not extend the time within which a decision must be issued after receipt of a complaint. Attempts at informal resolution will commence with.tw,o (2) weeks of the date of filing of the complaint. a. The EEO Officer will review the case and ascertain facts prior to the conference so that appropriate resolution can take place at the time of this meeting whenever possible, b, Although the complaintant should be encouraged to attend this conference, his/her failure to do so should not preclude his/her right to request a hearing on the matter, c, If mutually satisfactory resolution results and the Santa Ana LWIA concurs, the EEO Officer will write a brief report for the file stating the issues and resolution. The matter shall then be considered closed, d, If resolution does not result, the complainant shall be provided the necessary information and assistance to request a hearing if he/she so desires, 3, Request for Hearing a. As in the case of the complaint, the request for a hearing should be put in writing and be filed in person or by mail. A governing board resolution of authorization to appeal should also be submitted when appropriate, The request should be filed with: Lydia H. Morgan EEO Officer Santa Ana Local Workforce Investment Area 1000 E. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92701 9 25N-51 b, A hearing will be scheduled by the EEO Officer within thirty (30) days of the date of filing of the complaint. 4. Notice of Hear"lng Upon receipt of the request for hearing, the complainant and the respondent will be notified in writing of the hearing ten (10) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing. The ten-day notice may be shortened with the written consent of the parties. A decision will be issued by the Santa Ana LWIA within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of the complaint. The hearing notice shall be in writing and contain the following information: a. The date of notice, name of the complain~r:t, and the name of the party against whom the complaint is filed. b. The date, time, and place of hearing before an impartial hearing officer, c. p, statement(s) ofthe alleged violation(s) d, Advise as to where information or assistance may be obtained, and the name, address, and telephone number of the Santa Ana L WIA Equal Employment Opportunities (EEO) Officer who can answer inquiries. B. Conduct of Hearing The hearing shall be conducted in an informal manner with strict rules of evidence not applicable, Unnecessary technicalities should be avoided. It should provide the flexibility to enable adjustment to the circumstances presented. 1, The hearing officer shall have complete independence to obtain facts and make decisions, The hearing officer shall be in a position to render impartial decisions and thus should not be subordinate to the Santa Ana LWIA or its subrecipients. The hearing officer will be selected from a .Iist of names on file with the EEO Officer. 2. Full regard must be given to the requirements of due process to insure a fair and impartial hearing. 3. The hearing office designated by the EEO Officer to function in a quasi-judicial capacity should begin the hearing by summarizing the record and the issue and should explain the manner in which the hearing will be conducted, making sure that everyone involved understands the proceedings. Such explanations should be adapted to the needs of the specific situation. The hearing officer might take testimony under oath or affirmation to give some assurance of veracity to the hearing. 10 25N-52 4, The burden of proof should be reasonable and flexible, dependent upon the circumstances of the case involved. The hearing officer determines the order of proof. Generally, the party making the complaint has the obligation of establishing his or her case and should be examined first. 5. The party involved should have the right to be represented (at their own expense) if he/he so desires. Other he/she is limited to his/her own abilities and those of the hearing officer in obtaining testimony in the case. 6. It is important that the hearing officer obtain the fullest information for the record, If the parties involved, or their representatives, do not know how to ask the right or pertinent questions in pursuing their right to due process, it . shall be necessary for the hearing officer to step in to have all the materials and relevant facts elicited. . 7. The practice in informal hearings is generally not to apply strict rules of evidence in obtaining facts. However, the quantity of evidence required to support a decision on an issue should be sufficiently credible that the state (or other appropriate agency), upon reviewing the decision, would conclude that the decision is supported by substantial evidence, 8, The hearing officer should attempt to negotiate 2 resolution of the issue at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing. 9. Within ten (10) days of the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing officer will issue a recommended decision to the LWIA for final determination. The recommended decision shall be in writing and may be accepted, rejected or modified by the Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board, C. Issuance of Decision Within sixty (60) calendar days of filing of the complaint, the Santa Ana LWIJi, shall issue a written decision to all parties by first class mail. The final decision shall contain the following information: 1, The name of the parties involved. 2, A statement of the alleged violation and issues related to the alleged violation, 3, A statement of the facts, 4. The decision and the reasons for the decision. 5. /\ statement of corrective action, if any, to be taken, 6, Notice of the right to request, within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the decision, a review of the decision by the State Review Panel. 11 25N-53 D. Record of Hearing An administrative file containing support documents on the complaint resolution process hearing conducted will be retained by the Santa Ana L\NIA. The purpose of a record is to serve as substantiation of the process followed by the Santa Ana LWIA on the resolution of the issues and the results. This information would then be available for subsequent review in the event the matter is raised with the State. Such records must be retained for a three-year period after the grant has been officially closed out. The Santa Ana LWIA's written decision will be included in the record. Evidence received at the hearing, notes by the hearing officer, stenographer's notes and tape recordings may also be used, E, Establishment of Complaint Procedures In accordance with Section ,667,600, each employing agency including private-for- profit employers of participants under the Act is required to establish a complaint procedure for resolving matters relating to the terms and conditions of employment. Employers may operate their own grievance system or may utilize the Santa Ana LWIA's established procedures under Section 667,600, At a minimum these procedures must include: 1, Written notice, upon enrollment into employment training services, of the scope and availability of such procedures. Employer's grievance procedures shall be set forth in a written document and must meet the regulation mandate that a complaint will be resolved with sixty (60) days from the date the complaint was filed, A copy of employer's grievance procedure shall be provided to each participant upon enrollment in employment training. 2. Written notice, at the time the grievance is filed,Jf, the procedures under which the grievance will be processed. 3. Written notification of the disposition of the grievance and a written decision shall be issued within thirty (30) days of the filing of the grievance unless a present and long established grievance specifically provides other limits; and 4. Written notification of the participant's right to request a review of the employer's decision by the Santa Ana LWIA and the State Review Panel in accordance with Section 667.600. 12 25N-54 IV. Procedures for Handling Complaints at the State Level Section 181 (c) of the Act and the WIA regulations at 20 CFR, Section 667.600(d) requires the Governor to establish a State Review process of complaints filed at the L WIA grant recipient level and of complaints initially filed at the State level. Appeals of decisions issued at the LWIA level including audit disallowances and sanctions shall be reviewed by the State Review Panel. The State Review Panel shall review the record established at the LWIA level and shall issue a decision based on the information contained therein. Complaints which may be initially filed at the State level will be heard by an independent hearing officer designated by the State Workforce Investment Division (V\lID), The hearing officer shall conduct a hearing and issue a recommended decision'to the State Panel: The recommended decision shall be in writing and may be accepted, rejected or modified by the State Review Panel. A. Form and Filing of Complaint. 1, Request for State Review of LWIA. Level Decisions On receipt of a complainant's request for review because of an unsatisfactory decision, the State shall provide for an independent state review. 2, Filing of Requests for State Review The State Review Panel shall review all L WIA level decisions when a request for review is filed within 10 days of receipt of the adverse decision. Such requests must be filed inwriting with the Chief of the WID Office, The request for review should contain the following information: a. Full name, address, telephone number of the party requesting the review b, Full name, address, telephone number of the other party c. A copy of the decision d. Brief statement of reasons for review or the section of the LVVIA decision to be reviewed including regulatory and statutory citations e. A statement of the relief sought. 13 25N-55 - 3. Complaintant Responsibility It is the responsibility of the complainant to include in the request for review a written statement setting forth the facts presented at the LWIA hearing which support the requested relief, The Chief, WID. shall mail a copy of the request for review to the other party and to the LWIA, It shall be the responsibility of the LWIA to submit the complete record including a typed record of the hearing to the Chief, VvlD, within ten (10) days. B. Conduct of Hearings, 1, Request for Hearing at the State Level If no decision has been issued at the LWIA level or the State has determined an audit disallowance or imposed sanctions, the complainant may request a hearing. The hearing officer will then issue a recommended decision to the State's Review Panel for final determination. 2. Filing for Request for Review The request for a State hearing shall be filed within ten (10) days after LWIA should have issued a decision or ten (10) days after the issuance of the audit disallowance or sanction, The request shall be filed directly with the Chief of the WID in writing and should include the following: a. Full name. address, and telephone number of the party requesting the review b, Name, address. and telephone number'of the LWIA c. Copies of complaints made at LWIA level from which no decisions were issued or sanctions imposed d. A statement of basis for the request for hearing. 3. Evidentiary Hearing Upon receipt of the request for a State level hearing, a hearing before a designated hearing officer will be scheduled. 14 25N-56 - The hearing will be recorded mechanically or by court reporter, Both parties concerned will have the opportunity to present oral and written testimony under oath, to call and question witnesses in support of his/her position, to present oral and/or written arguments, to examine records and documents relevant to the issue(s), and to be represented. The hearing officer shall issue a written decision, which shall be forwarded to the State Review Panel forfinal determination. The State Review Panel may accept, reject or modify this recommendation. The decision of the State Review Panel is final except for audit disallowances, which must be approved by'the Secretary of Labor, c. State Review Panel The State Review Panel will consist of a panel of three representatives from the Employment Development Department: one from the Legal Offices, one from the WID, and one from the Director's office, The panel will issue a written decision, which will be sent to the appropriate parties within thirty (30) days of receipt of the request for State review, Decisions issued by this panel, under the authority of the Governor, are final. D. Issuance of State Review Decision, The State review will be limited to violations of the WIA, implementing VVIA regulations or the grant agreement. This review shall be limited to the record. established at the LWIA hearing, V. Procedures for Handling Discrimination Complaints by Participants A. Complaints on the basis of race, color, or national origin, age, sex, religion, political affiliation or belief, retaliation, and citizenship, where appropriate, must be filed within 180 days of the alleged occurrence. 1, It is the responsibility of the Santa Ana L WIA's Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Officer to determine jurisdiction and to make the complainant aware of and provide assistance in filing a complaint in accordance with the Santa Ana LWIA's procedure under Section II (A), 15 25N-57 . ~ ' ~ ' " - -" . PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING NON-CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS . . . . . No later than] 80 days of alleged discrimination Handling of complaints filed at L WlA level arising in connection with VIlA programs operated by L\VlA..s Infom1a] Resolution Process . . . . Fi:ing of Complaint / Request for Hearing Notice of Hearing issued by LVlIA 1.N C) ~ ,- "<: V, 0. ~ tJ ~ c., Hearing Conducted r ! J L WIA Decision within 60 days . . . . Unsatisfactory Decision or L W1A Decision not issued within 60 davs FrTithin ] 0 days of receipt of unsaiisfactory decision or ] 0 da,Vs from date L WIA decision should have been issued . . . . Request for State Review I Govemor's Decision issued by State Review Pane] 1.N c::;, ....... ::::-' ..;: L::. . . . . Uno decision issued bv State Review Panel . . . . Appeal to DOL 25N-58 2, In cases where areas of authority overlap, it is the responsibility of the EEO Officer to advise the complainant of the existence of State, Federal and other proper action agencies, which may also have a bearing. 3. Complainants alleging discrimination under this part will be made aware of their right to file directly with the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), U,S. Department of Labor and applicable procedures. 4. Complainants must file their complaint directly with: Lydia H, Morgan EEO Officer Santa Ana Local Workforce Investment Area 1000 E, Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 200 Santa Ana, Ca 92701 VI. Procedures for Handling Handicap Complaints by Participants Complaints alleging discrimination on the basis of handicap will be filed and processed under the Department of LabOi regulations implementing Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 at 29 Code of Federal Regulations Section 32. 1. Complaints must exhaust the Santa Ana L WIA's informal resolution procedures before filing their complaint with OCR. 2, Complainants will be made aware of the 180 days requirement in which to file his/her complaint. p.,. Procedures at the LWIA Level 1. The complainant shall file his/her complaint dir,ectly with the Santa Ana LWIA. Upon receipt of the complaint, the EEO Officer shall investigate and gather information concerning the complaint. 2, An informal conference will be held with the parties concerned in an effort to resolve the issue(s). The complainant has the right to be present and may be represented during the conference. 3, The Santa Ana LWIA shall issue in writing its decision to the complainant no later than thirty (30) days after the filing of the complaint. 16 25N-59 B. Procedures at the State Level 1. The complainant may appeal to the State if he/she is not satisfied with the decision of the Santa Ana LWIA. 2, The Complainant must file his/her appeal as a request for review directly with the Chief WI D within ten (10) calendar days after the receipt of the Santa Ana L WIA's decision. 3. The Chief-WID, shall issue a decision no later than thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the request for review. 4. After the complainant has received a decision or no decision has been received Jmm the Director of Employment Development Department (on behalf of the Governor), the complai-nant has the right to appeal his/her complaint within thirty (30) calendar days to the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) with the Department of Labor, 17 25N-60 ~ - ,- , .' . ' < - - - PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING HANDICAP COMPLAINTS - ~.- No later than] 80 days of alleged discriminaiiol1 Filing of complaint on the basis Of Handicap with L\V1A Day 1 Informal Resolution . . Uno resolution reached . . . . Request for Hearing Notice of Hearing I Hearing Conducted Dayi45 Day L V,lA Decision . . . . Unsatisfactory Decision OT No Decision . . . . State Revie\v Govemor's Decision 60 Days Filed within 30 days of IWlA/State Decision or 90 da;vs from date of initial filing of complaints Appeal to Assistant Secretary Department of Labor 25N-61 GLOSSARY OF WIA TERMS AGE DISCRIMINATION ACT - A law passed by Congress in 1975 which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age by any program or activity receiving Federal funds. APPLICANT _ An individual who applies to a subrecipient or contract for services provided under W1A and who has no yet transitioned to the status of participant. ASSESSMENT _ Services designed to determine each participant's employability, aptitudes, abilities and interests and to develcp a plan to achieve the participant's employment and related goals; also to identify the available employm~nt and training activities appropriate for the participant. Testing and counseling may also be used during the assessment pr:ocess. CHARGING PARTY (CP), COMPLAINANT, GRIEVANT. OR AGGRIEVED PERSON - The person who charges that he/she has been discriminated against under Department of Justice nondiscrimination and civil rights regulations and/or guidelines. DISCRIMINATION _ In general, a failure to treat all equally, whether intentional or unintentional; the effect of an action, policy or practice which selects an individual or class of persons to receive unequal treatment. ELIGIBLE NON-CITIZEN _ Lawfully admitted permanent resident, aliens, lawfully admitted refugees, and parolees and other individuals authorized by the Attorney General to work in the United States. EMPLOYER _ An employer subject to the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, including state and local governments and any Federal agency subject to the provisions of Section 717 of the Civil Rights Act, as amended; and any Federal contractor or subcontractor covered by Executive Order 11246, as amended. GRIEVANCE _ An allegation that something imposes an illegal obligation or burden or denies some equitable or legal right, or causes injustice. HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUAL _ Any individual who has a physical or mental disability that constitutes or results in a substantial handicap to employment. 18 25N-62 INTAKE _ Includes screening to determine eligibiiity; to select from eligible applicants those individuals who are most in need and can benefit from program services; to complete procedural requirements necessary to enroll an individual into the program and to refer those not enrolled to other programs. JOINT COMPLAINT _ A complaint of employment discrimination covered by Tit,le VII or the Equal Pay Act and by Title VI or Title IX. Individual "joint complaints" are normally investigated by EEOC unless OCR has a compelling reason to investigate. "Joint complaints" alleging discrimination in employment and other practices and pattern or practice "joint complaints" are normally investigated by OCR. JURISDICTION _ Authority to investigate and resolve complaints against an institution subject to a law or statute which has been assigned to OCR for enforcement, i.e" Title VI, Title IX, etc, PARTICIPANT _ Any applicant who has: (1) Been determined eligible for participation upon intake; and (2) Who is receiving subsidized employment, training or services (except post-termination services) funded under the Act, following intake, except for an individual who receives only outreach and/or intake and assessment services. 19 25N-63 Exhibit D CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS and COOPERATNE AGREEMENTS The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: 1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an ~fficer or ep1ployee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee 'of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contracts, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. 2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. 3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. TIns certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31 U.S.c. 1352, Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more that $100,000 for each such failure. tJLAI/i! D~ Grantee/Contractor Organizati on William M. Dickerson Executive Director CSU FULLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION Print Name of Certifying Official 3/4-/oP . , Date Signature 25N-64 Exhibit E Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements The certification set out below is a material representation upon which reliance is placed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in awarding the grant. If it is later detennined that the contractor knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, in addition to any other remedies available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug-Free Workplace Act. CERTIFICATION A. The contractor certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the contractor's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about- (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The contractor's policy ofmaintaining a drug-free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance program; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee who will be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement requirements by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph -(a) that, as a condition of employment under the contract, the employee will - (1) Abide by the tem1S ofthe statement; and (2) Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction, 25N-65 Pg. 2 (e) Notifying the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherurise receiving actual notice of such conviction; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted - (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including tem1ination; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f). B. The contractor shall insert in the space provided on the attached "Place of Performance" form the site(s) for the performance of work to be carried out with the grant funds (including street address, city, county, state and zip code) the contractor further certifies that, if it is subsequently detennined that additional sites will be used for the performance of work under the contract, it shall notify the u.s. Department of Housing and Urban Development immediately upon the decision to use such additional sites by submitting a revised "Place of Performance" form. Dated: J!~f t/;L A flL-- Program Operator 25N-66 DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PLACE OF PERFORMANCE FOR CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG-FREE ,VORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Name: Name of COtItractor: Contractor Number: Date: The Contractor shall insert in the space provided below the site(s) expected to be used for the performance of work under the contract covered by the certification: Place ofPerfonnance (include street address, city, county, state, zip code for each site): .._-....._____..-.:__'0;__""'.....-..___.......---... --."""""""~~,..~_..",....~~~~___==__~,_,=_~___~~_:........".................~"'~,...._..T.,,~_.~ ---.".......................""""'~-..,.,......""""..~...-.,.,...........~-"..--~..,...._-----,-,-_...---~.,.,...,......-.,_....'.........--,..---"'._,-.-.....,..-.--,-,-".-.-, __.~_~._.__._,_.___._._'____,_.._.....~A~_.~._.._,_.___...,_.__,...._.______~__~._,.__-...__""_____._._________"'___..._._.__,'____._.-~_....,..,,^---._- 25N-67 Exhibit F PAYMENT SCHEDULE Over the period of the contract, quarterly reports are to be made to the Oversight and Dat~ Committee with a final report made to the Workforce Investment Board (WID) once all four quarters have been studied all'd a final Retnm on Investment (ROT) report issued. The total cost of the study is not to exceed $20,000, Partial payments of no more than one-quarter of the total may be requested after any three (3) presentations of quarterly results to the Oversight and Data Committee, The final invoice may be submitted after presentation of the final written report to the Workforce Investment Board. 25N-68 Exhibit H Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions Tllls certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, 29 CFR Part 98, Section 98.510, Participants' Responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part vn of the May 26, 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211), Before compJetinl?: certification, read the attached instructions. r The prospective primary participant, (i,e" grantee) certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: a. Are not presently debaued, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; b, Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (federal, state or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (l)(b) of this certification; and d. Have not within a three year period preceding tlus application/proposal had one or more public transaction (federal, state or local) tenninated for cause or default. 2. Vlhere the prospective primary recipient of federal funds is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to tIus proposal. c"tlr m:L-~ CORPORATIOR Grantee/Contractor Org3.1uzation William M. Dickerson Executive Director Name and Title of Official Authorized to Certify On BCI::Zle Grant'Z i~ .~, ~~/L SIgnature Date 25N-69 INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective recipient of federal assistance funds 1S providing the certification as set out below. 2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective recipient of federal assistance funds knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the Department of Labor (DOL) may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 3. The prospective recipient of federal assistance funds shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective recipient of federal assistan~e funds learns that ~ts certificatio~ was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances, 4, The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended, II "ineligible," "lower tier covered transaction," "participant," "person," "primary covered transaction," "principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the person to which this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The prospective recipient of federal assistance funds agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the DOL. 6. The prospective recipient of federal assistance funds further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and voluntary exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions," v"ithout modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to check the List of Parties Excluded from Procurement or Non- Procurement Programs. 8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establislunent of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which, is nonnally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the DOL may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. Debarment cert. ] -08 25N-70