The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About19E - APPROVAL AND ADOPTION ENTERPRISE ZONEREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2008 TITLE: APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF CONDITIONS FOR FINAL SANTA ANA ENTERPRISE ZONE DESIGNATION l.~ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1~ Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Approve and adopt a Negative Declaration for the Santa Ana Enterprise Zone. 2. Direct staff to comply with all conditions as outlined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development so the Santa Ana Enterprise Zone can receive final designation. DISCUSSION On January 31, 2008, the City of Santa Ana received a Conditional 15-year Enterprise Zone designation from the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The Enterprise Zone (EZ) Program was created by the State of California Legislature for the purpose of stimulating the economy in areas deemed by the State to be economically challenged. The program offers State Tax Incentives to businesses in the zone which helps the City retain companies and attract new companies to the area. On March 17, 2008, the City of Santa Ana received a letter from the California Department of Housing and Community Development describing the conditions that must be met before a Final Enterprise Zone designation can be issued. The conditions to be met include: describing the elements of the Hiring Credit vouchering plan, providing a detailed analysis of the advertising and promotional strategy for the EZ, and a listing of the staff that will be involved with the marketing of the EZ. Also, one of the conditions required by the State in order to receive a Final Enterprise Zone designation is the submission of a Negative Declaration. This Negative Declaration addresses the environmental 19E-1 Approval and Adoption of Conditions for Final Santa Ana EZ Designation June 2, 2008 Page 2 impacts of designation of the proposed zone and finds that the project would not create a significant effect on the environment. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project. The Negative Declaration was circulated for a 30-day public review period from April 30, 2008, through May 30, 2008. No comments were received as of the date of preparation of this action. The Negative Declaration finds that the State Enterprise Zone (SEZ) designation is a financial incentive program encouraging businesses to locate in Santa Ana and does not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project or any other development project. Therefore, the SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts and the Negative Declaration, Environmental Review No. 2007-190, will be filed for this project (Exhibit 1). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Nancy T. dwards Assistan Director Community Development Agency NTE/RW/mlr 060206 Approve&AdoptConditions EZ Designation 19E-2 Initial Study And Negative Declaration for Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Prepared for: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-25 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Contact: Ray White, Enterprise Zone Representative 714/647-5384 Prepared by.• Jones & Stokes 17310 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 320 Irvine, CA 92614-5600 Contact: Chad Beckstrom, AICP 949/260-1080 November 2007 EXHIBIT 1 19E-3 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Claudia C. Alvarez COUNCIL MEMBERS David Benavides Carlos Bustamante Michele Martinez Sal Tinajero vncent F. Sarmiento CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING ~ BUILDING AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. BOX 1988 • Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy Pursuant to the Procedures of the City of Santa Ana for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Evaluator has completed an Initial Study for the project described below: Project Number: ER No. 2007-190 Applicant: City of Santa Ana Project Location /Address: The proposed SEZ is contained entirely within city limits and encompasses approximately 16.32 square miles. Project Title /Description: The proposed SEZ is designed to attract new businesses, create new jobs, and retain existing businesses and jobs in the city. The project would allow businesses located within the SEZ to take advantage of state tax incentives and City benefits. The SEZ, in and of itself, would not result in any specific construction projects, land acquisition projects, or other development projects. The Santa Ana SEZ would have a horizon year of 2023, extending 15 years from the June 7, 2008, expiration date of the existing enterprise zone. And does hereby find: The proposed project would not create a significant effect on the environment. The proposed project analyzed in the Initial Study would result in either no impactor less than significant impact to each environmental factor evaluated. C3~te; Sergi c Planner Thtg dIM8A1'1i11~8r! flGfAli atlo~P6ad ba+'tl1s d~i~ipn-I'n~tl~irgl r ~'~d~~isaf~fB++~ t3ffi~i~l, and a 'natic~rt is died. 19E-4 r ~r Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview .......................................... Overview ......................................................................... Authority ......................................................................... . Scope of the IS/MND ...................................................... Impact Terminology ........................................................ IS/MND Organization ...................................................... .................1-1 .................1-1 .................1-1 .................1-2 .................1-2 .................1-3 Chapter 2 Project Description ...............................................................................2-1 Project Overview .....................................................................................2-1 Project Background ................................................................................2-1 Project Location ......................................................................................2-2 Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses ...................................2-2 Chapter 3 Environmental Checklist ......................................................................3-1 I. Aesthetics ................................................................... .................15 11. Agricultural Resources ................................................... .................16 Ill. Air Quality ...................................................................... .................16 IV. Biological Resources ..................................................... .................18 V. Cultural Resources ........................................................ .................19 VI. Geology and Soils .......................................................... .................20 VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................. .................22 VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................... .................23 IX. Land Use and Planning ...............................:................. .................25 X. Mineral Resources ......................................................... .................25 XI. Noise .............................................................................. .................26 XII. Population and Housing ................................................. .................27 XIII. Public Services .............................................................. ................. 27 XIV. Recreation ..................................................................... .................28 XV. Transportation/Traffic ..................................................... .................29 XVI. Utilities and Service Systems ......................................... .................30 XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance ............................... .................32 Chapter 4 References ............................................................................................4-1 Printed References .................................................................................4-1 Chapter 5 Preparers ...............................................................................................5-1 Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study i 19E-5 November 2007 J8S 00814.07 Figures Figure Follows Page 1 Regional Location ...................................................................................2-2 2 Project Area ............................................................................................2-2 Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 19 E-6 J8S 00814.07 r Acronyms and Abbreviations AELUP Airport Environs Land Use Plan ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AQMP Air Quality Management Plan Basin South Coast Air Basin CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Levet C02 carbon dioxide DAMP Drainage Area Management Plan FAR Federal Aviation Regulation Farmland Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance GHG greenhouse gas I-5 Santa Ana Freeway NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination PCBs polychlorinated bipheynals PUC Public Utilities Commission RCPG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SR-22 Garden Grove Freeway SR-55 Newport Freeway VMT vehicle miles traveled Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study ~~~ 19E-7 November 2007 J$S 00814.07 r~ 4~ Mr Nr M ^ w w Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview Overview The City of Santa Ana (City) has prepared this initial study (IS) to evaluate the potential environmental consequences associated with the application of the City to the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) fora 15-year State Enterprise Zone (SEZ) designation. The proposed SEZ is designed to attract new businesses, create new jobs, and retain existing businesses and jabs in the City. The proposed project would allow businesses located within the zone to take advantage of state tax incentives and City benefits. The proposed Santa Ana SEZ is contained entirely within City limits and encompasses approximately 16.32 square miles. Santa Ana received its original SEZ designation on June 8, 1993, and is now one of 42 enterprise zones throughout California. The existing Santa Ana SEZ encompasses approximately 11.09 square miles. The original boundary included approximately 9.53 squaze miles, while the expansion azea, approved on August 1, 1994, added approximately 1.56 squaze miles. Companies already in the SEZ can qualify- for benefits, as do new businesses relocating or expanding into the SEZ. The City's SEZ designation lasts for 15 yeazs, and there aze currently over 11,000 businesses residing in the zone. As part of the HCD's consideration of the SEZ designation, the proposed project is required to undergo an environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA}. The initial study is a preliminary analysis prepared by a lead agency to determine whether an environmental impact report or a negative declaration is required. If the initial study concludes that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report must be prepared. Otherwise, a negative declazation or mitigated negative declaration is prepared. The information in this initial study supports the process to be taken for the appropriate CEQA compliance document. M r Authority The preparation of an IS is governed by two principal sets of documents: CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines va~na n~~a oiatC ~merpnse cone Initial Study 1-1 19E-8 November 2007 J&S 00814.07 City of Santa Ana Chapter 1. Introduction and Overview (California Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq.). Where appropriate and supportive to an understanding of the issues, reference will be made either to the statute, the State CEQA Guidelines, or appropriate case law. This IS, as required by CEQA, contains 1) a project description; 2) a description of the environmental setting, potential environmental impacts, mitigation measures for any significant effects, and consistency with plans and policies; and 3) names of prepazers. Scope of the IS This IS evaluates the proposed project's effects on the following resource topics: ^ aesthetics, ^ agricultural resources, ^ air quality, ^ biological resources, ^ cultural resources, ^ geology and soils, ^ hazards and hazardous materials, ^ hydrology and water quality, ^ land use and planning, ^ mineral resources, ^ noise, ^ population and housing, ^ public services, ^ recreation, ^ tra.nsportation/traffic, ^ utilities and service systems, and ^ mandatory findings of significance. Impact Terminology The following terminology is used to describe the level of significance of impacts: ^ A finding of no impact is appropriate if the analysis concludes that the project would not affect the particulaz topic azea in any way. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study November 2007 1-2 J&S 00814.07 19E-9 Nr City of Santa Ana Chapter 1. Introduction and Overview ^ An impact is considered less than significant if the analysis concludes that it would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment and requires no mitigation. ^ An impact is considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated if the analysis concludes that it would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of environmental commitments or other enforceable measures that have been agreed to by the applicant. ^ An impact is considered potentially significant if the analysis concludes that it could have a substantial adverse effect on the environment. IS Organization The content and format of this report are designed to meet the requirements of CEQA. The report contains the following sections. ^ Chapter 1, "Introduction and Overview," identifies the purpose and scope of the IS and the terminology used in the report. ^ Chapter 2, "Project Description," identities the location, background, and planning objectives of the project and describes the proposed project in detail. ^ Chapter 3, "Environmental Checklist and Analysis," presents the checklist responses for each resource topic. This section includes a brief setting section for each resource topic and identifies the impacts of implementing the proposed project. ^ Chapter 4, "References," identifies all printed references and individuals cited in this IS. ^ Chapter 5, "List of Preparers," identifies the individuals who prepared this report and their areas of technical specialty. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 1-3 J&S 00814.07 19E-10 rr ~r w Chapter 2 Project Description Project Overview The City is submitting an application to the State of California HCD for a 15-year SEZ designation. The proposed SEZ is designed to attract new businesses, create new jobs, and retain existing businesses and jobs in the city. The project would allow businesses located within the SEZ to take advantage of state tax incentives and City benefits. The SEZ, in and of itself, would not result in any specific construction projects, land acquisition projects, or other development projects. Such activities may occur from individual projects as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives; however, those projects would be subject to individual environmental review pursuant to CEQA, as well as the City's general plan and zoning regulations. The Santa Ana SEZ would have a horizon year of 2023, extending 15 years from the June 7, 2008, expiration date of the existing enterprise zone. Project Background Original enterprise zones had their beginning in Britain, which offered tax reductions and a lifting of regulatory burdens for local businesses. The main objective was to foster an attractive business environment in specific areas where economic growth was lacking. Two legislative bills, Assembly Bill (AB) 40 and AB 514, were approved in 1984 and established the Enterprise Zone and Economic Incentive Area Programs in the State of California. The Nolan Bill provided for the establishment of 25 enterprise zones, while the Waters Bill provided for the establishment of 9 program/economic incentive areas. The bills varied slightly in terms of the incentives offered to businesses; however, both programs were designed to help communities spur business growth and job generation by offering state tax credits and incentives to qualifying businesses. The first zones/areas were awarded in 1986 and by 1993 all original "slots" provided by legislation were filled. With the passage of Senate Bill (SB) 2023 in 1997, the two zone programs were unified into an even stronger and more lucrative program. SB 965, which was also passed in 1997, made the Work Opportunity Tax Credit and its successor programs an automatic Enterprise Zone Hiring Program qualifier. In 1990, with the onset of the recession and the impact Initial Study N~~ac LVIIC 2-1 19E-11 November2007 J$S 00814.07 City of Santa Ana Chapter 2. Project Description of the state's budget on local revenues, the City sought a means to bolster its economic development efforts. The SEZ program appeared to be the appropriate avenue to pursue. Thus, in fiscal year 1991-1992, Santa Ana began the intensive and highly competitive application process for the program. Santa Ana's application was one of 22 submitted for the remaining five designations allowed under the Nolan Bill at the time (five more slots have since been added by legislation). In the application, the City demonstrated a strong commitment to its residents and businesses and proposed awell-defined marketing plan to ensure the SEZ's success. The City was able to do this based on the powerful foundation it had built through its previous economic development efforts. This foundation, coupled with the support the City received from its business, brokerage, lending, and residential communities, all provided key ingredients in producing a successful application. Santa Ana received its designation on June 8, 1993, and now holds one of 42 enterprise zones throughout California. The existing Santa Ana SEZ encompasses approximately 11.09 square miles. The original boundary included approximately 9.53 square miles, while the expansion area, approved on August 1, 1994, added approximately 1.56 square miles. Companies already in the zone can qualify for benefits, as do new businesses relocating or expanding into the zone. The City's enterprise zone designation lasts for I S years, and there aze currently over 11,000 businesses within the zone. Project Location The proposed Santa Ana SEZ is contained entirely within city limits and encompasses approximately 16.32 square miles. Figure 1 shows the regional location, and Figure 2 shows the proposed boundaries of the Santa Ana SEZ. Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The proposed project area is located in a highly developed urban area. Land uses within the SEZ and vicinity aze characterized by generally moderate to high-density urban uses, including residential, commercial, schools, Santa Ana College and train depot, and industrial uses. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 2-2 J65 00814.07 19E-12 r r~ - --....,_.....,..a,, ~~,,,~~~~~ 4 ~~ Jones & Stokes Figure 1 Regional Vicinity 19E-1 3 Santa Ana Enterprise zone rr ^ J 1 0 n i i 19E-14 I j ~rl t t Cha ter 3 -~ p j Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance PLANNING DIVISION I. Project Title: Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone 11. Project Numbers: ER 2007-190 Ili. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-25 Santa Ana, CA 92702 IV. Project Planner and Phone Number: Sergio Klotz (714) 667-2700 V. Location: Citywide (see Figure 2-2 in Chapter 2 for project boundaries)- VI. Environmental Determination. On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that: A. ® The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. B. ^ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. C. The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. D. ^ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR (EIR No. - }pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. E. ^ Pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. -)has been prepared earlier and only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the previous EIR adequate and these changes do not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the environment. An ADDENDUM to the EIR shall be prepared; F. ^ Pursuant to Sectiori 151.62 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. -)has been prepared earlier; however, subsequent proposed chariges_in the project andlor new information of substantial importance will cause one yr more sigP~c~ nt effects not preciously discussed. A SUBSEQUENT EIR shall be prepared. Printed ~,!.o.a Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study 3-1 19E-15 November J8S 00814.07 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Santa Ana Community Development Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-25 Santa Ana, CA 92702 General Plan Designation: Various. Zoning: Various. Description of Project: See Chapter 2. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The proposed project area is located in a highly developed urban area. Land uses within the proposed SEZ and vicinity are characterized by generally moderate to high-density urban uses, including residential, commercial, schools, Santa Ana College and train depot, and industrial uses. Other agencies whose approval is required: State of California Department of Housing and Community Development. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November2007 Initial Study 3-2 J8S 00814.07 19E-16 M l Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below reflect potentially significant impacts associated with the proposed project, as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. O Aesthetics O Mineral Resources O Agricultural Resources O Noise O Air Quality O Population /Housing O Biological Resources O Public Services O Cultural Resources O Recreation O Geology /Soils 0 Transportation /Traffic O Hazards and Hazardous Materials O Utilities /Service Systems O Hydrology /Water Quality O Mandatory Findings of Significance O Land Use and Planning w w w aama r+na Mate tnterpnse Lone November2007 Initial Study 3-3 J8S 00814.07 19E-17 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: I. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on aproject-specific screening analysis). II. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. III. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. IV. "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Aesthetics -Would the project: A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ^ ^ ® ^ B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited ^ ^ ^ to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a state highway? C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? ^ ^ ® ^ D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ^ ^ ® ^ Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study 3-4 November2007 J8S 00814.07 19E-18 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance A w w N N w Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 11. Agricultural Resources - In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental .effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agricultural farmland. Would the project: A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or ^ ^ ^ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program in the California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation, maintain detailed maps of these and other categories of farmland.) B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or ^ ^ ^ a Williamson Contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment ^ ^ ^ which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. Air Quality -Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ^ ^ ^ applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? B. Violate any stationary source air quality standard ^ ^ ® ^ or contribute to an existing or proposed air quality violation? C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase ^ ^ ® ^ of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emission which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? D. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ^ ^ ® ^ concentrations? Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study 3-5 19E-19 November2007 JSS 00814.07 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ^ ^ ® ^ number of people? IV. Biological Resources -Would the project: A. Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly ^ ^ ® ^ or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian ^ ^ ® ^ habitat or natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands ^ ^ ^ (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling hydrological interruption, or other means? D. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ^ ^ ® ^ protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? V. Cultural Resources -Would the project: A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ® ^ significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ® ^ significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to define Section 15064.5? C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique ^ ^ ® ^ paleontological resource or site? Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November2007 Initial Study 3-6 J8S 00814.07 19E-20 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Issues 8~ Supporting Information Sources Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant Im act No I p mpact D. Disturb any human remains, including those ^ ~ ^ ® ^ interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. Geology and Soils -Would the project: A. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ^ ^ ^ delineated on the most recent on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? ^ ^ ® ^ 3. Seismic-related ground failure, including ^ ^ ® ^ liquefaction? 4. Landslides? ^ ^ ® ^ B- Would the project result in substantial soil erosion ^ ^ ® ^ or the loss of topsoil? C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique ^ ^ ^ geologic feature? D. Is the project located on strata or soil that is ^ ^ ® ^ unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence , liquefaction or collapse? E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of ^ ^ ^ wastewater, is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study November2007 3-7 J8S 00814.07 19E-21 ._ ~ Environmental Checkli~ For CEQA Complianei Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Issues 8 Su pporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials -Would the project: A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the ^ ^ environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? '. - B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or t ^ ^ acu ely hazardous materials, substance or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of ^ ^ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? D. For a project located within an airport land use l ^ ^ p an or where such a plan has not been adopted , within two miles where of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality -Would the project: A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board ^ ^ water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? B- Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ^ ^ interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study November2007 3-8 J&S 00614.07 19E-22 Environmental Checklist For CEQA .Compliance `~ Issues r9i Supporting Information Sources C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amounf of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off- site? D. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? E. Place housing withiri a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? F. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? G. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? IX. Land Use and Planning -Would the project: A. Physically divide an established community? B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ^ Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November2007 Initial Study 3 9 J$S 00814.07 19E-23 Environmental Checklis For CEQA Compliance Issues 8~ Supporting Information Sources X. Mineral Resources -Would the project: A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? XI. Noise -Would the project result in: A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without project? E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study 3-10 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Novembe2007 J&S 00814.Oi 19E-24 ^ . Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance w w N w w w A Issues 8~ Supporting Information Sources XII. Population and Housing -Would the project: A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? B. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. Public Services A. Would the project result in substantia! adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public service: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ~ ^ ® ^ ~ ^ ^ Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November2007 Initial Study 3-11 J&S 00814.07 19E-25 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues ~ Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XIV. Recreation A . Would the project increase the use of existing ^ ^ ® ^ neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. B. Does the project include recreational facilities or ^ ^ ^ require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. Transportation /Traffic A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ^ ^ ® ^ relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion at intersections?) B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level ^ ^ ® ^ of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ^ ^ ® ^ either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature ^ ^ ® ^ (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? E. Result in inadequate emergency access? ^ ^ ® ^ F. Result in inadequate parking capacity? ^ ^ ® ^ Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November2007 Initial Study 3-12 J&S 00814.07 19E-26 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance G. Conflict with adopted policies supporting ^ ^ ® ^ alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Issues & Supporting Information Sources XVI. Utilities and Service Systems A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? B. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? D. Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed? E. Result in the determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? F. Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's sold waste disposal needs? G. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ^ Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November2007 Initial Study 3-13 J8S 00814.07 19E-27 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the ^ ^ ® ^ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? B. Does the project have impacts that are individually ^ ^ ® ^ limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). C. Does the project have environmental effects which ^ ^ ® ^ will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Novembe2007 Initial Study 3-14 J&S 00814.07 19E-28 ^ Environmental Checklist For CEQA C li omp ance I. Aesthetics A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Santa Ana General Plan (1982) does not specifically identify any scenic vistas within the city limits; however, the City of Santa Ana General Plan Scenic Corridor Plan does identify scenic corridors within the city limits (City of Santa Ana 1982:27). There are three major types of scenic corridors: high-speed corridors, ~~ such as freeways; primary street corridors; and secondary corridors. The high-speed corridors include the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5), Newport Freeway (SR-55), and Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22). These freeways operate at a regional scale. The plan requires buffer edges and landscaped edges to screen unnecessary views of the actual freeways and promote selected views of the city. Primary corridors are significant transportation and activity features of the city and are accessible by all freeways. Examples include First/Fourth ' Streets, Main/Broadway, and MacArthur Boulevard. Secondary corridors provide "stitching° to link neighborhoods, district centers, and mixed use corridors together. Examples of secondary corridors include Harbor Boulevard and Fairview Avenue. The scenic corridor ~ plan identifies specific goals, policies, and implementation programs for the designated ~~ scenic corridors. The proposed SEZ does not include any specific construction, renovation, or demolition projects. New construction or redevelopment activities that may occur as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis at the time of the proposed action in accordance with CEQA and the City of Santa Ana development review and permitting process. Therefore, impacts to scenic vistas are considered less than significant and no further study is necessary. ~~ 8. No Impact. I-5, SR-55, and SR-22 are the three highways that traverse the city. None of these highways are identified or eligible as a state scenic highway (Caltrans 2007).. Therefore, the proposed project could not damage scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings, and/or historic buildings within a state scenic highway, since there are no state ' ~ scenic highways within the project area. No impact would occur. C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Santa Ana General Pfan (1982) and specific elements (i.e.: Land Use Element of 1998) have identified a number of scenic resources and land use characteristics and qualities that should be preserved, including city scenic corridors 3 i (discussed above) and historical districts and buildings. The City of Santa Ana has a designated Downtown Historical District identified on the National Register of Historic Places. This District contains several historical buildings, landmarks, and resources. The City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element (1998) and Citywide Design Guidelines (revised 2006) .identify specific goals and policies to i preserve the character and nature of the historic district and historic buildings and landmarks. The proposed SEZ does not propose any specific construction, renovation, or demolition projects. Individual projects as a result of the SEZ would be evaluated in accordance with City plans, policies, development standards, and design guidelines. If physical changes to the built environment occur within the vicinity of the scenic corridors or historic districts/buildings/landmarks as an indirect result of the proposed project, any identified indirect impacts to the scenic corridors or historic districts would be identified during the case-by-case evaluation as part of the City's development and review process and in accordance with CEQA requirements. Therefore, impacts related to aesthetic effects are considered less than significant. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-15 J&S 00814.07 19E-29 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ does not propose any specific development projects or public improvements related to increase in light or glare. There is a potential that new development could occur as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives, which could include exterior lighting and parking lots. Any potentially indirect impacts regarding light and glare would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with CEQA during the City's development and review process. Therefore, impacts related to light and glare are considered less than significant. II. Agricultural Resources A. No Impact. According to the Land Use Element of the Santa Ana General Plan, the city is designated primarily as Residential, Urban, Industrial, and Commercial (City of Santa Ana 1998:LUE-6). Although the city is mostly urbanized, there are prime farmlands, unique farmlands, and farmlands of statewide importance within the city limits (California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program 2006). These farmlands, however, are not located in the proposed SEZ area. Therefore, no important farmland would be converted as a result of the proposed project. No impact would occur. B. No Impact. The wlliamson Act Contract applies to parcels consisting of at least 20 acres of prime farmland or at least 40 acres of land not designated as prime farmland. The California Department of Conservation indicates that there are no Williamson Act Contract or Preservation lands on or near the project site (California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, wlliamson Act Program 2006). Therefore, no wlliamson Contract lands would be removed as part of the proposed project and the proposed project would not conflict with existing agricultural zoning. No impact would occur. C. No Impact. The proposed project would not disrupt or damage the operation or productivity of any areas designated as farmland. As discussed above, no farmland is located within the project site or within the surrounding areas that would be affected by any elements of the proposed project. No impact would occur. III. Air Quality A. No Impact. The proposed SEZ is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is required, pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act, to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment (i.e., 03, PM,o, and PM25). The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development activities. Any individual projects that may occur as an indirect result of SEZ business incentives would be subject to the SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The AQMP contains a comprehensive list of pollution control strategies directed at reducing emissions and achieving ambient air quality standards (SCAQMD 2003). These strategies are developed, in part, based on regional population, housing, and employment projection prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties, and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development, and the environment. Wth regard to air quality Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study November 2007 3-16 19 E -3 0 ~&S 00814.07 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance ~`;~, `~ w w planning, SCAG has prepared the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCPG), which includes Growth Management and Regional Mobility chapters that form the basis for the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP, and are utilized in the preparation of the air quality forecasts and consistency analysis included in the AQMP. Both the RCPG and AQMP are based, in part, on projections originating with County and City general plans. Since the proposed SEZ would not result in any direct changes to existing land use designation or density allotments of any community plan, pursuant to SCAQMD guidelines, it is considered consistent with the region's AQMP. As such, the proposed SEZ would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Therefore, no impact would occur. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. As discussed above, the project site is located within the Basin. State and federal air quality standards are often exceeded in many parts of the Basin. The proposed SEZ does not include any specific construction, renovation, or demolition projects. It is a business incentive program to provide financial incentives for businesses to locate within Santa Ana. Any emissions generated by individual projects that may occur as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives are unknown and speculative at this time. With the passage of AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, California is faced with reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions,' and impacts related to the generation of GHG emissions are being addressed as part of the CEQA process. Automobiles have been identified as the greatest source of GHG emissions, and the quantity of GHG emissions from automobiles is directly correlated with the amount of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Because automobiles are the largest contributor to carbon dioxide (COZ) emissions, it can be deduced that if a project does not result in an increase of daily trips or VMT, that the project would not result in an increase of GHG emissions. The proposed project would not directly generate any increase of daily trips or VMT because it would not result in any specific demolition, construction, land acquisition, or other development activities. The proposed SEZ is a financial program to promote business development in Santa Ana and does not include specific construction, development, demolition, or remodeling projects. Furthermore, any specific project that indirectly results from the SEZ's business incentives would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis using CEQA and undergo the development and review process of the City. Therefore, the proposed project has less-than-significant impacts regarding green house gases and no further study is needed. C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Individual projects that could occur as an indirect result of SEZ business incentives would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis under CEQA during the City's development and review process. Any direct or indirect impacts of the projects that may indirectly because of the SEZ incentives would be evaluated at that time and any necessary mitigation measures would be incorporated at that time. Therefore, impacts of the proposed SEZ are considered less than significant. D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors that could be impacted by the project consist of people that are susceptible to health effects, such as respiratory disease, from activities around them. Sensitive receptors are typically found at schools, hospitals, senior care facilities, and residences. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Any direct or ~ Greenhouse gases related to human activity include: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, tetrafluoromethane, hexafluoroethane, sulfur hexafluoride, HFC-23, HFC-134a, and HFC-152a. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-17 J8S 00814.07 19E-31 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance indirect impacts of the projects that may result from the SEZ incentives would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis under CEQA during the City's development and review process. Therefore, impacts of the proposed SEZ are considered less than significant. E. Less-Than-Significant Impact. According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, activities associated with odor complaints typically include agriculture, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding (SCAQMD 1993). The proposed project does not include any specific construction projects, land acquisitions, or other development projects; therefore, the proposed project would not produce any objectionable odors. Any specific development projects indirectly resulting from the financial mechanisms and business incentives of the SEZ would be subject to comply with SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113. These rules limit the amount of volatile organic compounds from cutback asphalt and architectural coatings and solvents to reduce the odor producing potential during and after construction (SCAQMD 1985, 2006). Additionally, these projects would be subject to evaluation under CEQA during the City's development and review process and odor-producing impacts would be evaluated at that time. Therefore, impacts of the proposed SEZ are considered less than significant. IV. Biological Resources A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The city of Santa Ana is largely developed and urbanized, and the affected parcels under the proposed SEZ are primarily commercial and industrial land uses. The open space areas throughout the city no longer reflect native biological habitats that existed prior to urbanization. Although there is a lack of native habitats in the city, the California Department of Fish and Game identifies the San Diego horned lizard as a sensitive species in the area. However, this species is limited in range. Additionally, the last time the lizard was sighted was in 1922; it was located in the northern area of Santa Ana (City of Santa Ana 1998:LUE-A-43). Although the SEZ does not propose any specific construction, renovation, or demolition projects, potential impacts to the San Diego horned lizard could occur from development that occurs as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives. Any future development occurring as an indirect result of the SEZ would be required to go through the City's development review process, and would be evaluated for its potential biological impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures using the regulations imposed by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would be required to avoid or minimize potential biological impact. Therefore, due to the general lack of habitat and the established regulatory requirements, the potential of the SEZ to indirectly result in activities that would violate sensitive species regulations or policies is considered less than significant. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ is generally void of any riparian habitat or other natural communities. The Santa Ana River is channelized and no longer contains riparian habitat; therefore, it does not have the potential to accommodate sensitive biological resources. Santiago Creek, which contains more native vegetation and unlined channels, also runs through portions of the project area. However, the potential to impact biological resources within Santiago Creek are minimal, and would be mitigated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with established regulatory criteria. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. oarna r{na dare tmerpnse cone November 2007 Initial Study 3-18 J$S 00614.07 19E-32 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance C. No Impact. The proposed SEZ would not result in impacts to wetland areas because no wetlands are located within the proposed SEZ. The Santa Ana River is channelized and no longer contains any wetland habitats (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-44). Santiago Creek is not fully channelized and has areas throughout that are designated as open space. These open space areas are thought to be riparian habitats; however, the potential to impact riparian habitats within the Santiago Creek are minimal, and would be mitigated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with established regulatory criteria. Additionally, no natural blue line streams are identified in the area according to topographic maps published by the U.S. Geologic Survey (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-44). Therefore, no impact would occur. x D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ possibly contains habitat for the San Diego horned lizard. However, any future development occurring as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives would be required to go through the City's development review process. This process would evaluate any potentially significant impacts to sensitive species at that time. Where needed, mitigation measures using the regulations imposed by the ' ~ California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would be imposed in order to comply with any policies or ordinances that protect sensitive biological resources. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. :r ~ V. Cultural Resources A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. There are a number of locations in the city and proposed SEZ that are considered to be National and State Historic Resources (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-51). Aside from the sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the City has developed a list of culturally significant sites, which have been included in the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties (Santa Ana 1998:A-51). Additionally, the California State Historic Resources Inventory also includes some 1,500 structures and sites in the city (Santa Ana 1998:A-51). The Santa Ana Downtown Historic District, bordered by Flower Street to the west, 10"' Street to the north, 1~ Street to the south, and one block past Main Street to the east, was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1984 (Santa Ana 1998:A-54). The nomination recognized this district as having the largest and earliest collection of downtown buildings in Orange County, made of various eclectic architectural styles ranging from the years 1889 to 1934, with a preponderance of 1920s architecture. The district as a whole features an articulated variety of recognized 1920s design styles including Spanish Revival, Classical Revival, and Beaux-Arts. With this are many Modern-style early 1930s facades placed upon buildings that were damaged after the 1933 Long Beach earthquake. French Park and Henninger Park, along with North Broadway, Floral Park, North Central, Northeast, and Wilshire Square neighborhoods are identified as other historic areas in the city (Santa Ana 1998:A-51). Furthermore, there may be structures, buildings, and ~ subterranean historic resources within the project area that have not been listed or otherwise evaluated for their historic significance. The proposed SEZ does not actually result in any construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project; individual projects may occur as an indirect result of SEZ business incentives. Individual projects would be subject to evaluation under CEQA during the City's development and review process and impacts to historical resources would be evaluated at that time, along with any necessary mitigation. Therefore, the impacts of the proposed SEZ to historical resources are considered less than significant. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The project site is located within an urbanized area and has been disturbed by previous and existing development. However, the land use element of the A Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-19 J&S 00814.07 ~ 19E-33 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance general plan (1998) identifies six prehistoric sites located within 1 mile of city boundaries and 18 historical archeological sites within the city (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-51). There may also be archaeological resources within the project area that have not been identified or otherwise evaluated for their potential historic significance. The General Plan identifies that UCLA Archeological Information Center recommends a review of the South Central Coastal Information Center for future development located adjacent to areas where archeological resources had been found in order to identify sensitive areas (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-51). The proposed SEZ does not include the construction, development, demolition, or remodeling of any specific project. Furthermore, any individual project that indirectly results from the business incentives provided by the SEZ would undergo the mandatory CEQA evaluation under the City's development and review process. Any impacts to archaeological resources would be identified during this process and mitigation measures would be provided if and when necessary. Therefore, the proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts on archeological resources. C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. Although the proposed project site is located within an urbanized area and has been disturbed by previous and existing development, the proposed SEZ may potentially contain unknown paleontological resources. Shallow excavations of any projects occurring indirectly as a result of the SEZ are unlikely to encounter significant fossil resources. Excavations exceeding 5 feet in depth in any undisturbed sediments could potentially uncover and disturb potentially significant fossil resources. However, the proposed SEZ would not directly result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Any individual projects resu-ting from the business incentives provided by the SEZ would undergo the mandatory CEQA evaluation under the City's development and review process. Any impacts to paleontological resources would be identified during this process and mitigation measures would be provided if and when necessary. Therefore, the proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts on paleontological resources. D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The project area is not known to contain human remains interred outside formal cemeteries. There are at least three cemeteries in the city of Santa Ana. The proposed SEZ would not directly result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project that would require the disruption of known human remains. Any projects that occurred as an indirect result of the SEZ may include grading and excavation. If a discovery of human remains is made during a project that indirectly occurred from the SEZ, the discovery would be regulated by state law, which requires the stop of work and reporting to authorities. The existing state law regarding the discovery of human remains reduces impacts of the proposed SEZ to less than significant. VI. Geology and Soils A-1 No Impact. According to the most recent Alquist-Priolo Zoning Map, no known fault traces are located in the city of Santa Ana (California Department of Conservation, California Geologic Survey 2006). No impact would occur. A-2 Less-Than-Significant Impact. Seismic hazard from ground shaking is typical for large areas of southern California. Faults within relative close proximity to the city of Santa Ana include the Newport-Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault, the Newport-Inglewood (offshore} Fault, and the Compton Thrust Fault. All of these faults are typical of southern California seismicity, and it is reasonable to expect a strong ground motion seismic event during the lifetime of any Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-20 J&S 00814.07 19E-34 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance proposed project in the region. The probability and consequences of such earthquakes are unknown, but they could result in minor structural damage and possible injuries, ranging up to large-scale destruction and possible fatalities. The proposed project includes fiscal mechanisms designed to attract new business and retain existing businesses and jobs in the most economically distressed areas of the city. The zone designation would not result in any specific construction project, demolition project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Such activities may occur from individual projects as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives; however, these would occur in accordance with building and safety standards as specified by the City Building Division. All buildings would be constructed in compliance with the latest earthquake-resistant design and relevant codes available. Impacts are considered less than significant. A-3 Less-Than-Significant Impact. The term liquefaction describes a phenomenon in which a saturated, cohesionless soil loses strength and acquires a degree of mobility as a result of strong ground shaking during an earthquake. The factors known to influence liquefaction potential include soil type and depth, grain size, relative density, groundwater level, degree of saturation, and both the intensity and duration of ground shaking. The City has identified specific liquefaction areas that range between a very high to very low liquefaction potential (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-39). Generally, the southern and western areas of the city have a high and high-medium liquefaction potential whereas the central to northeast areas of cit , y have a low liquefaction potential. The proposed project includes fiscal mechanisms designed to attract new business and retain existing businesses and jobs in the most economically distressed areas of the city. Any specific construction project, demolition project, land acquisition project, or other development project that indirectly arise from the implementation of the SEZ would occur in accordance with building and safety standards as specified by the City Building Division. These standards inherently provide for measures to reduce the t ti l i po en a mpacts of liquefaction to structures. In addition, project sites within liquefaction zones would require specialized geotechnical analyses to address potential hazards, and the incorporation of design measures with oversight by the City Building Division. These technical studies would provide a more site-specific evaluation of the area and provide additional design measures for site preparation excavation grading and construction This , , , . evaluation and design measures would also reduce potential impacts related to liquefaction. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant. A-4 Less-Than-Significant Impact. The project area is generally flat and fully developed. The proposed project includes fiscal mechanisms designed to attract new business and retain existing businesses and jobs in the most economically distressed areas of the city. Any specific construction project, demolition project, land acquisition project, or other development project that indirectly arise from the implementation of the SEZ would occur in accordance with building and safety standards, as specified by the City Building Division. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed project area is generally flat and fully developed. Developed land generally has minimal amounts of erosion and usually does not contribute to the loss of topsoil. Furthermore, the General Plan Land Use Element (1998) identifies that an erosion hazard is associated mainly with soils along the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-37). Since the Santa Ana River is mainly channelized with concrete, erosion hazards only remain with Santiago Creek (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-37). Santiago Creek is located in the northern part of the city. It runs partially along the northeastern boundary of the proposed SEZ, and joins the Santa Ana River just south of Garden Grove Boulevard. The proposed project includes fiscal mechanisms Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3 21 J8S 00814.07 ~ 19E-35 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance designed to attract new business and retain existing businesses and jobs in the most economically distressed areas of the city. It does not include specific development projects. Any specific development project, demolition project, land acquisition project, or other development project that indirectly arise from the implementation of the SEZ would occur in accordance with accepted engineering practices and best management practices for the control of erosion, as well as building and safety standards as specified by the City Building Division. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. C. No Impact. The project area is largely urban and previously developed. The general plan (1982) does not specify any unique geologic or physical feature(s) within the city to be preserved. Therefore, no impact would occur. D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. Subsidence, swelling, and ground settlement are generally due to the withdrawals of fluids such as oil or water from the earth. Soils in portions of the city along the Santa Ana River may be subject to settling since these areas contain unconsolidated and recent alluvium (City of Santa Ana 1998:A-40). Any specific construction project, demolition project, land acquisition project, or other development project that indirectly arise from the implementation of the financial mechanisms of the SEZ would occur in accordance with building and safety standards as specified by the City Building Division. These standards inherently provide for measures to reduce the potential impacts of unstable soil and subsidence to structures. In addition, it is likely geotechnical studies would be required and prepared for most construction activities within the city. These studies would provide a more site-specific evaluation of the area and certain design measures for site preparation, excavation, grading, and construction. This evaluation and proposed design measures would also reduce any potential impacts related to unstable soil and subsidence. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant. E. No Impact. Sewer access is available throughout the project area. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would be included as part of the proposed project. Additionally, Santa Ana is a fully developed city with a full wastewater infrastructure system and any projects that indirectly arise from the implementation of the proposed project would likely use the existing wastewater infrastructure system. No impact would occur. VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project; therefore, the proposed project does not have the capability of creating a significant hazard to the public or the environment since it would not routinely transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials. Due to past and current practices, certain locations within the proposed SEZ are identified as potential sources of environmental hazards. Generally, areas identified as potential sources of contamination would be evaluated for their potential to impact human health and the environment in Phase land/or Phase II environmental site assessments. These would be required as part of the City development review process and the evaluation of potential impacts from hazards or sources of contamination. Additionally, depending on the age of structures within the SEZ, it is possible that asbestos, lead-based paint, and polychlorinated bipheynals (PCBs) could be disturbed during any renovation/demolition activities associated with individual projects indirectly occurring as a result of the SEZ business incentives. These types of impacts would need to be addressed on a case-by-case basis under CEQA during the City's development and review process. At Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3.22 J&S 00814.07 19E-36 w Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance that time, hazardous impacts would be identified- and mitigation measures proposed if necessary. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed project involves designating parts of the city of Santa Ana as an SEZ to provide financial incentives for the promotion of economic development in depressed areas of the city. The proposed project would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. These types of impacts would be addressed on a case-by-case basis under CEQA during the City's development and review process. Any impacts related to hazardous emissions, and mitigation measures needed, would be identified at that time. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. These types of impacts would be addressed on a case-by-case basis under CEQA during the City's development and review process. Any impacts related to hazardous emissions, and mitigation measures needed, would be identified at that time. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The closest airport to the proposed SEZ is John Wayne Airport. The southern/southeastern section of the proposed SEZ is located within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John Wayne Airport, which is administered by the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The part of the proposed SEZ within the AELUP area is also within the Height Restriction Zone for the John Wayne Airport and the notification area of the Federal Aviation Regulation {FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces aeronautical obstruction area. The SEZ would not directly result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. However, any projects that occur as an indirect result of the SEZ would need to evaluate the notification requirements of Part 77 and complete a Form 7460-1, if required. Additionally, any projects indirectly resulting from the SEZ would require a referral by the City to the ALUC if those projects were located within the AELUP Planning Area and if they required certain City approvals (i.e. the zone change) under PUC Section 21676(b). These types of impacts would be addressed on a case-by-case basis under CEQA during the City's development and review process. Any impacts related to hazardous emissions, and mitigation measures needed, would be identified at that time. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The city of Santa Ana is included within four watersheds: San Diego Creek, Santa Ana River, Talbert, and Westminster. Each of these watershed areas are under the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and subject to the objectives, water quality standards, and best management practice requirements established in the Santa Ana River Basin Plan and Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). The City of Santa Ana Storm Water Management Program Ordinance (Municipal Code Ch. 18) governs all projects within the city to comply with the Orange County DAMP and the Santa Ana RWQCB N1S4 permit, which is the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit that governs storm water discharges into the public storm system (MDS Consulting 2007:1). The city of Santa Ana does not contain any impaired water bodies, as defined by Section 303 of the Clean Water Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-23 19E-37 gas aoeia m Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Act. However, the city does contain several drainage facilities that convey surface water runoff into bodies of water that are classified as impaired. The proposed SEZ does not propose any specific construction, renovation, or demolition projects. Any future development occurring as an indirect result of the SEZ would be required to go through the City's development review process, and would be evaluated for potential impacts to water quality under CEQA. Where needed, mitigation measures using the above referenced regulations would be required to avoid or minimize potential water quality impacts caused by any individual project occurring as an indirect result of the proposed SEZ. Therefore, impacts of the proposed SEZ to water quality are considered less than significant. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The SEZ .does not propose any specific construction, renovation, or demolition projects, yet potential groundwater impacts could occur from development as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives. Therefore, any future development occurring as an indirect result of the SEZ would be required to go through the City's development review process, and would be evaluated for its potential impacts to groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge. Currently, the city receives 64% of its water from groundwater wells; this percentage is regulated by the Orange County Water District's allowable basin pumping percentage (City of Santa Ana 2005:2-3). This amount can be adjusted as needed based on groundwater basin hydrologic conditions (City of Santa Ana 2005:2-4). Therefore, the potential of the SEZ to indirectly result in activities that would substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge is considered to be less than significant. C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ covers an area of existing intense urban development. Runoff from existing and future developed areas would continue to be conveyed via manmade drainage s#ructures, and ultimately drain to the Santa Ana River and the Pacific Ocean. Any future development occurring as an indirect result of the proposed SEZ financial incentives would be required to go through the City's development review process. Any future individual project would be evaluated for any increase in the rate and flow of water runoff and/or increase in polluted runoff under CEQA. Where needed, mitigation measures would be required to avoid or minimize potential impacts caused by any individual project occurring as an indirect result of the proposed SEZ at the time of the project's review. Therefore, impacts of the proposed SEZ to water quality are considered less than significant. D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ covers an area of intense urban development. Runoff from developed areas would continue to be conveyed via manmade drainage structures, ultimately draining to the Santa Ana River. Given the intense existing urban development within the proposed SEZ, it is not likely that the proposed SEZ designation would substantially alter drainage patterns or cause substantial offsite erosion due to induced development and growth as a result of SEZ business incentives. Furthermore, any future individual project indirectly resulting from the proposed SEZ financial incentives would be evaluated under CEQA during the City's development and review process. At this time impacts would be evaluated related to changes in drainage and erosion and mitigation measures would be proposed. Thus, the proposed SEZ would have less-than- significant impacts. E. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The entire proposed project area is within the City of Santa Ana. It is located within the 100-year floodplain and the 500-year floodplain (City of Santa Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-24 J8S 00814.07 19E-38 ^ Environmental Checklist '~ For CEQA Compliance Ana 1998:A-41). The proposed SEZ would operate as a business recruitment and retention tool, intended to attract new businesses and help existing businesses to expand. Therefore, the proposed SEZ would not result in any new residential development or housing projects and would not place housing within the 100-year floodplain. Additionally, no new flooding risks to existing development would occur as a result of the proposed SEZ. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would be located within the 100-year floodplain, as well as the 500-year floodplain. These floodplains are associated with the Prado Dam Inundation Zone. Prado Dam is a flood control and water conservation project constructed and operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. The Los Angeles District has begun construction to increase the capacity of the reservoir behind Prado Dam (USAGE 2006). The SEZ is a business recruitment and retention tool, which would not result in the placement of any structures within the 100-year or 500-year floodplain. Although structures could be developed as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives, the improvements to Prado Dam would limit any potential flood impacts created by these structures dr to these structures. Also, any structures built as an indirect result of the SEZ designation would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the Flood Plain Management Ordinance (City of Santa Ana 1982:19). Impacts would be less than significant. G. Less-Than-Significant Impact. As stated under Section VIII-F, the proposed project is within the 100-year floodplain; however, improvements to Prado Dam and the requirements imposed by the Flood Plain Management Ordinance would limit flooding impacts created by the structures or to the structures. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. IX. Land Use and Planning A. No Impact. The proposed project would not physically divide any established communities or neighborhoods. The proposed SEZ would not involve the extension of highways or other physical barriers through the community that could divide community areas. Therefore, no impact would occur. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project; therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project. However, individual projects that may occur as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives would comply with land use plans, policies, and programs set forth in the existing community and redevelopment plan(s) relevant to the SEZ, and the City's general plan and specific plans relevant to the SEZ. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. C. No Impact. According to the City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans established within the city (City of Santa Ana 2004:11). Therefore, the proposed SEZ would not be in conflict with any habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans. No impact would occur. X• Mineral Resources Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-25 J8S 00814.07 19E-39 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance A. No Impact. Portions of the city of Santa Ana are designated by the Califomia Department of Conservation as having areas containing mineral deposits the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data (MZ-1), as well as areas where the information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence (MZ-3) (California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1994). Since no significant mineral deposits exist within the project area, no impact would occur. XI. Noise A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Santa Ana Noise Element uses outdoor and indoor noise limits for residential land uses impacted by transportation noise sources based on Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). The City noise element states that for residential land use, the exterior noise exposure level will not exceed 65 CNEL, and the interior noise exposure level will not exceed 45 CNEL. Additionally, the City noise ordinance is designed to control unnecessary, excessive, and annoying sounds from stationary (nontransportation) noise sources. The proposed SEZ is a financial incentive program to encourage and promote businesses to locate in Santa Ana. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project that would expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of city standards. Any future development projects that occur as an indirect result of the proposed SEZ business incentives would be subject to CEQA review under the City's redevelopment review process. They would be evaluated for noise impacts and where needed, mitigation measures, such as the preparation of noise reports, incorporation of sound attenuation measures, and compliance with the City's noise ordinance, may be required to avoid or minimize potential noise impacts. Since these types of impacts would be addressed on a case-by-case basis at the time of the review of any individual project that indirectly resulted from the SEZ financial incentives, the proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ is a financial incentive program to encourage and promote businesses to locate in Santa Ana. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project; therefore, the proposed SEZ would not result in any excessive groundborne vibrations or groundbome noise levels. The City's redevelopment review process would evaluate the future project(s) and where needed, mitigation measures, such as the preparation of noise reports, incorporation of sound attenuation measures, and compliance with the City's noise ordinance, would be required to avoid or minimize potential noise impacts. Therefore, since the proposed SEZ would not generate excessive groundborne vibrations, and the proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts. C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ is a financial incentive program to encourage and promote businesses to locate in Santa Ana. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project; therefore, the proposed project would not result in any permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the proposed project. Individual projects that may indirectly result from the SEZ incentives would be subject to CEQA evaluation during the City's development and review process. Impacts related to any permanent increase in ambient noise levels would be identified and where Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-26 J8S 00814.07 19E-40 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance needed, mitigation measures, such as the preparation of noise reports, incorporation of sound attenuation measures, and compliance with the City's noise ordinance, would be required to avoid or minimize potential noise impacts. Therefore, the proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts. D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. See XIC above. E. Less-Than-Significant Impact. A small part of the proposed SEZ in the southern portion of th i e c ty is located within the Airport Environs Land Use Plan area for the John Wayne Airport. ' This small part is located in the established flight path for the airport and is within the airport's 60-d BA CNEL noise contour (Airport Land Use Commission 2002). This noise level would exceed the City of Santa Ana Exterior Noise Ordinance criteria at certain times of the day. Individual projects, which may indirectly result from the SEZ incentives, would be subject to a ~ CEQA review and evaluation during the City's development and review process. Any impacts regarding air traffic that could potentially expose people to excessive air traffic noise levels would be evaluated at that time and mitigation measures would be proposed where necessary. Therefore, the proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts regarding ., airport noise. XII. Population and Housing A. Less-Than-Significant Impacts. SCAG develops population forecasts employed for long- range planning of the city and surrounding southern California region. The proposed SEZ in and of itself would not result in increased population projections within the project area. Individual projects that may occur as an indirect result of SEZ business incentives could result in increased business opportunities. The proposed SEZ does not include the construction of housing, and indirect population growth that could potentially result from the SEZ incentives would be negligible as most business owners and employees currently reside in the area. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. B. No Impact. The proposed project would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project; therefore, the proposed project does not have the capability of displacing substantial numbers of existing housing necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Individual development projects indirectly resulting from the financial incentives of the SEZ would be limited to commercial and industrial areas, and would not directly affect residential properties. Therefore, no impact would occur. C. No Impact. As stated in Section XII-B above, the proposed project would not displace housing and, therefore, substantial numbers of people. No impact would occur. XIII. Public Services Fire Protection: Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Therefore, fire services within or throughout the proposed SEZ would not be directly affected. Individual projects that may occur as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives would be subject ~~ Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3.27 J8S 00814.07 19E-41 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance to local and state fire codes. Any new development would likely replace existing structural development, and would not significantly increase the net demand for fire protection. Additionally, with new development and tenant improvements, fire systems are often upgraded, which could potentially reduce fire protection demand. Adequate fire protection services are currently available, and the proposed project would not substantially increase demand for fire protection services. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Police Protection Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Santa Ana Police Department provides police protection services for the proposed project area. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Therefore, police protection services within or throughout the proposed SEZ would not be directly affected. The proposed project may indirectly increase development and businesses opportunities in the area, thereby contributing to an increased demand for police protection. Any new development would likely replace existing structural development, and would not significantly increase the net demand for police protection. Additionally, new development and more successful businesses could lead to reduced criminal activity. Adequate police protection services are currently available, and the proposed project would not substantially increase demand for police protection services. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Schools Less-Than-Significant Impact. School services in the city are provided by the Santa Ana Unified School District. The demand for new schools is generally associated with population increases or impacts on existing schools. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Additionally, the proposed project would not significantly increase the population, thereby placing a significant added burden on the Santa Ana schools. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Parks Less-Than-Significant Impact. The demand for parks is generally associated with the increase of housing or population in an area. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Therefore, park services within or throughout the proposed SEZ would not be directly affected. Additionally, the proposed project would not significantly increase the population, thereby placing a significant added burden on the Santa Ana parks. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Other Public Facilities No Impact. The project would not require any other new or altered service facilities. No impact would occur. XIV. Recreation A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. An increase in the use of parks is generally associated with the increase of housing or population in an area. The proposed SEZ would not result in any Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study 3-28 gas ooa~a.o~ 19E-42 C ~~ Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Therefore, park services within or throughout the proposed SEZ would not be directly affected. Additionally, the proposed project would not significantly increase the population, thereby placing a significant added burden on the Santa Ana parks. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. ~~ B. No Impact. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land ,~ acquisition project, or other development project. The proposed project does not include the development of recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. XV. TransportationlTraffic A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Therefore, the proposed project would not directly increase traffic. The proposed SEZ is a financial incentive program to encourage businesses to locate in Santa Ana. Individual projects that may occur as an indirect result of SEZ business incentives would be subject to CEQA review under the City's development and review process at the time of their proposal. Any impacts to traffic would be evaluated and disclosed at that time and mitigation measures to reduce or avoid any identified impacts would be proposed. B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. See Section XV.A above. C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The closest airport to the proposed SEZ is John Wayne Airport. The southern/southeastern section of the proposed SEZ is located within the boundaries of the AELUP for John Wayne Airport, which is administered by the ALUC. This area is within the Height Restriction Zone for the John Wayne Airport and the notification ;~ area of the FAR Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces aeronautical obstruction area. The SEZ would not directly result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Any projects that occur as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives would need to evaluate the notification requirements of Part 77 and complete a Form 7460-1, if required. Additionally, any projects indirectly resulting from the SEZ business '~' incentives would require a referral by the City to the ALUC if those projects were located within the AELUP Planning Area and if they required certain City approvals (i.e. zone ~`:~ change) under Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Section 21676(b). These types of impacts would be evaluated during the CEQA review as part of the City's development and review process. Therefore, the proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts regarding . air traffic hazards. D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Therefore, traffic ,s~ design features within or through the SEZ would not be directly affected nor would it increase incompatible uses. Any individual projects that indirectly result from the incentives of the SEZ would be subject to review on a case-by-case basis during the City's development and review process. During this time, impacts would be identified and evaluated and where ~ needed, mitigation measures would be identified to reduce or avoid impacts. Therefore, the -~ a~ proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts regarding traffic design features. '~ Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-29 J8S 00814.07 ~_~ 19E-43 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance E. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would not result in any impacts to emergency access within or through the SEZ. Any specific projects indirectly resulting from the SEZ business incentives would have to go through the City's development review and permitting process, and this process would require any project to comply with all applicable emergency access policies and requirements. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. F. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would not directly impact the parking capacity in the area. For projects that may indirectly result from the SEZ business incentives, parking requirements would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis as part of the City's development review process, and this process would require any project to comply with all applicable parking policies and requirements. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. G. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. The City of Santa Ana and the Orange County Congestion Management Plan (2005) outline a number of alternative transportation goals and policies. Any project that occurred as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives would need to comply with all applicable transportation policies through the City's development review process. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. XVI. Utilities and Service Systems A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific construction projects, land acquisition projects, or other development projects. Therefore, the proposed project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB. Individual projects that may occur as an indirect result of SEZ business incentives could exceed wastewater requirements. However, the project area is located within the service area of the RWQCB, and any projects indirectly resulting from SEZ incentives would be required to comply with the RWQCB's objectives, water quality standards, and best management practice requirements established in the Santa Ana River Basin Plan and Orange County DAMP. The City of Santa Ana Storm Water Management Program Ordinance (Municipal Code Ch. 18) governs all projects within the city to comply with the Orange County DAMP and the Santa Ana RWQCB MS4 permit, which is the NPDES permit that governs stormwater discharges into the public storm system. Therefore, wastewater treatment requirements would not be exceeded, and impacts would be less than significant. B_ Less-Than-Significant Impact. It is unlikely new or expanded water or wastewater treatment facilities would be required to accommodate the proposed SEZ. Any individual project that occurred as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives would connect to the existing sewer system. The Orange County Sanitation District manages and oversees all wastewater generated by central and northern Orange County, including the City of Santa Ana. This agency has a regular capital improvement program, which evaluates growth and demand for wastewater services in its service area. The program is intended to ensure it meets the needed future growth and demand in its service area. Additionally, since the proposed project would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project, no wastewater services would be needed. Therefore, less- than-significant impacts would occur. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-30 J&S 00814.07 19E-44 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The existing area is mostly impermeable to stormwater due to the impermeable surtaces. stormwater runoff is collected and conveyed as sheet flows into Orange County Flood Control storm drains and infrastructure. The runoff from Santa Ana is generally discharged into the Santa Ana River and empties, untreated, into the Pacific Ocean. The proposed project would not result in any specific construction project, land acquisition project, . or other development project; therefore, no additional stormwater drainage infrastructure would be needed. Individual projects indirectly resulting from SEZ business incentives would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis during the City's development review process. Less-than-significant impacts would occur. D. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Santa Ana is required to evaluate the appropriate level of water reliability sufficient to meet the needs of its various categories of customers (e.g., residential, industrial, etc.) during normal, dry, and continuously dry years. The California Water Management Planning Act of 1983 requires the City to evaluate the water supply and demand within its service area in the Urban Water Management Plan every `~ 5 years in the years ending in zero and five (City of Santa Ana 2005:1-1 ). The city receives 36% of its water through water imported by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and 64% of its water from groundwater managed by the Orange County Water - District (City of Santa Ana 2005:2-2). The Urban Water Management Plan uses historical normal year, wet year, dry year, and then multiple dry and wet years, as well as water usage over time in the service area, to establish a baseline (City of Santa Ana 2005:4-15). It then evaluates present and future conditions of water reliability in the city (City of Santa Ana 2005:4-15). The city used 44,920 acre feet of water in 2005 {City of Santa Ana 2005:4-19). This use includes all types of categories of customers, including large industrial users, ,~ = municipal uses (such as irrigating parks), offices, and residential consumers using water for • ~ drinking and landscaping purposes. The Urban Water Management Plan identifies that the city's demands for water can be met in average, single dry, and multiple dry years through the year 2030 based on current and projected water supplies and the demands forecast for normal, single dry-year, and multiple dry-year scenarios (City of Santa Ana 2005:4-19). - Based on this information and the City's evaluation and planning for reliability of water supplies, no new or expanded entitlements would be required to serve the proposed project area. Therefore, less-than-significant impacts would occur. E. Less-Than-Significant Impact. See Section XVI-B. F. Less-Than-Si nifican I g t mpact. It Is not antlclpated that the proposed project would generate solid waste, since it would not result in any specific construction projects, land acquisition projects, or other development projects. Any project indirectly resulting from SEZ business incentives would be evaluated during the City development review process to analyze impacts related to landfills. Furthermore, development projects within the proposed SEZ would comply with the City of Santa Ana Source Reduction and Recycling Element. Less-than-significant impacts would occur. G. No Impact. It is not anticipated that the proposed project would generate solid waste, since it would not result in any specific construction projects, land acquisition projects, or other development projects. However, should solid waste be created due to projects indirectly resulting from the business incentives of the SEZ, its removal would be regulated by local, state, and federal guidelines. No significant impact is anticipated. `:~ Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 3-31 J8S 00814.07 ~`~ 19E-45 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance A. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ is a financial incentives program intended to encourage businesses to locate in Santa Ana. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Therefore, the proposed project would not affect biological resources or cultural resources. However, the CEQA evaluation and development and review process of any individual projects that may indirectly result from the proposed SEZ financial incentives would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, the proposed SEZ would have less- than-significant impacts on the resources identified above. 8. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ is a financial incentives program intended to encourage businesses to locate in Santa Ana. The proposed SEZ would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Though ftature individual projects could potentially result in cumulative impacts, future projects within the proposed SEZ area would be evaluated to determine their cumulative impacts on a case-by-case basis during the CEQA evaluation and under the City's development and review process. If needed, mitigation measures to avoid or reduce potentially significant cumulative impacts would be proposed at that time. Therefore, the cumulative impacts of the proposed SEZ are less than significant. C. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ is a financial incentives program intended to encourage businesses to locate in Santa Ana. It would not result in any specific demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development project. Therefore, direct implementation of the proposed SEZ would not cause any substantial adverse effects on human beings or the environment. Future, individual projects that indirectly result from the financial incentives of the proposed SEZ could indirectly or directly cause substantial adverse effects to human beings or the environment. However, any future individual project would be evaluated under CEQA and the City's development and review process. Potentially significant impacts to human beings and the environment would be identified and evaluated, and mitigation measures, if necessary to reduce or avoid identified impacts, would be proposed and implemented. Therefore, the proposed SEZ would have less-than-significant impacts regarding substantial adverse effects on humans and the environment. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone Initial Study November 2007 3-32 J8S 00814.07 19E-46 W Chapter 4 References Printed References Airport Land Use Commission. 2002. Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. John Wayne Airport Impact Zones: Appendix D. California Department of Conservation, California Geologic Survey. 2006. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones. Last updated: January 29, 2007. Available: <http://www.consrv.ca.gov/CGS/rghm/ap/index.htm>. Accessed: June 28, 2007. California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. 2006. Important Farmland in California, 2004. California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Williamson Act Program. 2006. Agricultural Preserves 2004. Last updated: December 21, 2006. Available: <http://www.consrv.ca.gov/DLRP/lca/index.htm>. Accessed: June 27, 2007. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. 1994. Update of Mineral Land Classification of Portland Cement Concrete Aggregate in Ventura, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties, California. Part III -Orange County. Generalized Mineral Land Classification of Orange County, California. Open-File Report 94-15, Plate 1. 1994. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2007. The California Scenic Highway System. Available:< http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic/l.htm >. Accessed: April 10, 2007. City of Santa Ana. 1982. General Plan. Adopted August 24, 1982. City of Santa Ana. 1998. General Plan. Land Use Element. Adopted February 2, 1998. ;~ City of Santa Ana. 2004. Redevelopment Projects Areas Merger Initial Study/Negative Declaration ER 2004-34. March. City of Santa Ana. 2005. Urban Water Management Plan. November 7, 2005. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 19 E -417 Jgs °~'° °' City of Santa Ana Chapter 4. References City of Santa Ana. 2006. Citywide Design Guidelines. MDS Consulting. 2007. Tract No. 17071 Water Quality Management Plan. April 18, 2007. OCTA. 2005. Orange County Congestion Management Plan. SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District). 1985. Rule 1108 Cutback Asphalt. Adopted May 4, 1979. Amended February 1, 1985. SCAQMD. 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. SCAQMD. 2003. Air Quality Management Plan. August 1, 2003. SCAQMD. 2006. Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings. Adopted September 2, 1977. Amended June 9, 2006. USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), Los Angeles District. 2006. Reservoir Regulation Section, Prado Dam. Last updated: February 9, 2006. Available: <http://www.spl.usace.army.miUresreg/htdocs/prdo.html>. Accessed: September 4, 2007. Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 Initial Study 4 2 19 E -4 8 J8S D0814.07 r r M w M N M Chapter 5 List of Preparers City of Santa Ana Sergio Klotz Ray White Jones & Stokes Chad Beckstrom, AICP Nicole Breznock Lynze Milne Soraya Mustain Lisa Randall Senior Planner, Planning Division Enterprise Zone Representative, Community Development Agency Project Director Project Manager Environmental Analyst Graphics Editing and Production r~na ~wiC Cnlefpn5e LOrle Initial Study 5-1 November 2007 J&S 00814.07 19E-49 19E-50