HomeMy WebLinkAbout31A - MONOPINE WIRELESS - 2100 S FAIRVIEW REQUEST FOR .
COUNCIL ACTION
~g
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
MARCH 1, 2010
TITLE: APPROVED
? As Recommended
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2009-25 FORA ? As Amended
60-FOOT HIGH MONOPINE WIRELESS FACILITY ? Ordinance on 1S` Reading
? Ordinance on 2nd Reading
AT 2100 SOUTH FAIRVIEW STREET -SEQUOIA ? Implementing Resolution
DEPLOYMENT SERVICES, APPLICANT ? Set Public Hearing For
_j CONTINUED TO
I /r `,i
~ FILE NUMBER
CITY MANAGER
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive and file the staff report approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-25 as conditioned.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
On February 8, 2010, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution approving Conditional Use
Permit No. 2009-25 as conditioned by a vote of 4:0 (Gartner and Yrarrazaval absent) to allow the
construction of a 60-foot high monopine wireless facility for T-Mobile in the Light Industrial (M-1)
zoning district at 2100 South Fairview Street. The Planning Commission made no changes to the
recommended conditions of approval outlined in the attached staff report (Exhibit A).
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Jay revino
Exe ive Director
Planning & Building Agency
LDY: rb
Exhibit: A. Planning Commission Staff Report
31 A-1
i
31 A-2
REQUEST FOR
Y'
Planning Commission Action
'
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY
FEBRUARY 8, 2010 APPROVED
TITLE: ? As Recommended
PUBLIC HEARING -FILED BY SEQUOIA ? As Amended
DEPLOYMENT SERVICES FOR CONDITIONAL ? Set Public Hearing For
USE PERMIT N0.2009-25 FORA 60-FOOT DENIED
HIGH MONOPINE WIRELESS FACILITY ? Applicant's Request
AT 2100 SOUTH FAIRVIEW STREET ? Staff Recommendation
CONTINUED TO
Prepared by Larry D. Yenglin
a~..~
Executive Director Planning M Hager
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-25 as conditioned.
DISCUSSION
Reausst of Applicant
Sequoia Deployment Services, representing T-Mobile, is requesting approval of a conditional use
permit to allow the construction of a 60-foot high monopine at 2100 South Fairview Street.
Progerty Description
The property is located within the Light Industrial (M-1) zoning district and has a General Plan land
use designation of Industrial (IND) (Exhibit 1). The property is on the west side of Fairview, with the
west side all industrial uses and the east side a rnixture of single-family and multi-family residential
(Exhibit 2). The subject property is owned by Philip Edward and Marilyn Chalberg, and is the location
for Hydrabaths, Inc., and is approximately 3.64 acres in size, triangular in shape and improved with an
industrial building.
Project Description
T-Mobile is proposing to construct a 60-foot high wireless facility stealthed as a monopine. This
facility will provide increased cellular coverage and call capacity in this area. The branches will reach
a height of 65 feet to look like a natural tree. Equipment will be installed in a seven-foot high block
equipment enclosure at the base of the tree and will be surrounded by new landscaping in the form of
vines and shrubs (Exhibits 3 through 6). There are numerous trees already established in this area.
The proposed wireless facility will be for three arrays with four panel antennas on each side, for a total
of 12 panel antennas which will be camouflaged as a Canary Island Pine Tree or be located within the
base enclosure. The leased site is behind the industrial building next to the Santa Ana River. at the
other end of the property away from South Fairview Street.
EXHIBIT A
31 A-3
CUP No. 2009-25
February 8, 2010
Page 2
Analysis of the Issues
In July 1998, the City Council adopted an ordinance that regulates Wireless Communication facilities
throughout the City. Major wireless facilities are required to have a stealth design and be located on
a building or in an area that provides the greatest amount of visual screening. These antennas also
require the approval of a conditional use permit. A monopine design will provide the greatest stealth
for this facility in this area. The facility is located in an industrial area and is not near residential
uses. In addition, the structure will be designed to allow co-location by another provider. Further, all
wiring and conduit will be underground or hidden within the interior of the monopole.
The applicant has explored alternatives to this monopine, including providing a roof mounted facility
on the existing building and co-locating on another facility. The height of the building does not provide
the necessary height for transmission and there are no facilities close enough to provide the
necessary coverage and capacity that T-Mobile requires. The site currently has numerous mature
trees on this site, and the proposed monopine is located at the rear of the industrial building adjacent
to these trees. A facility designed as a monopine would provide the best stealth possible for this
location. This location is also optimum to provide the coverage necessary for existing and expanding
service. The proposed cellular antennas will provide a benefit to Santa Ana residents, businesses
and motorists who subscribe to T-Mobile by closing service gaps in the area. Equipment for the
facility will be located in a new enclosure at the base of this monopine and will be screened with a
block wall and additional landscaping. The proposed wireless facility complies with the City's
Wireless Communications Facility Ordinance and will provide needed service to this area of the City.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. Further, the project has
been designed to accommodate potential future users on this facility. Based upon the above analysis
and findings, staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-25 as conditioned.
CEQA Comaliance
This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the California Environmental
Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15303. This
Class 3 exemption allows in-fill developments for the construction and location of limited numbers
of new, small facilities or structures. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2009-151
will be filed for this project.
L rry D. en in, ICP Vince Frego P
Associate Planner Principal Planner
LDY:jm
IdyVeports~CUP 20101cup09-25 T-Mobile 2100 S. Fairview.pC
31 A-4
~ R1 I R1 R1 R1 t ~ R1 R1 R1
R1 i R, _ _ R1
~ R, C1 RI Rl ~s~
~ 0 ~ i~
c, c,
~ R2 ~ Ct
m e p C1 R1 ! C1
~ R1 s c, ~ c, R2
°m Rt ~ R2
~ / ~ R1 R,
11 p Ri R2 ~
/ / D ~ - I R2 R2 R2
~ R1 R2 i
R1 ~ oxncho~. cr.
/ R1 ~i
cerowu w
R1 W
M1 =
R1 R1
p R1
Mt / R1 R1 R1
PROJECT SRE R1
/ ~ 1 R1 Rt R1
M1 R1
/ M1 M1 + ~
I ~ R1 R1
Ra R1 R1 ~ "
M1 Mi qi
M1 R3 R1 i
M1 R1 R1 R1 D
R3
~ M1 ~ R1 R1 R1 1 R3
Ri
M1 M1 I R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 i
i c, R4 ;
WARNER AV
M1 M1 ~ C4 R,•PRU
R1-PRD
M1 n~'t R2-PRD R1-PRD
WARNER AV M1 I!
~ I
M1 M1 M1 ~ '
R1-PRD R1-PRD 1-PRD
~ R1 m
m
~ M1
~ M1 R4 R1 R1-PRD R1- R1-PRD
M1 = M1 ~ R1 PRD ~
M1 r--~- i
Al GENERALAGRICUL7URAL CR COMMERCAL RESIDENTUL R7 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
-B PARKING MODIFICATKNJ GC GOVERNMENT CENTER R2 TWO•FAMILY RESIDENCE
C-SM COMMERCULSOUTH MAIN M1 LIGHT INDUSTRUL R3 MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
C1 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL M2 HEAVY INDUSTRUL R4 SUBURBAN APARTMENTS
Ct~AD COMM.COMMERCUL-MUSEUM DISTRICT MO MiLRARYOPERATIONS RE RESIDENTUL ESTATE
C2 GENERALCOMMERCUL O OPEN SPACE SD SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT
C3 CENTRAL BUSINESS P PROFESSIONAL SP SPECIFIC PLAN
C3-A CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST' VILLAGE PCD PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
CS ARTERIALCOMMERGAL
CUP 09=25
T MOBILE MONOPINE
2100 SOUTH FAIRVIEW STREET ~
1" = 1000 FEET - =500 FEET
P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y
VICINITY MAP
EXHIBIT 1
31 A-5
S!N LE AMILY
R SIDE TIAL
SCHOOL
MULTI FAMILY REST ENTIAL
HARVARD STREET
LL !J!
Ir C ~
W s N G E
JI 2
LI HT INDUSI~RIAL ~ WWI Fi M1 Y
Zvi R S/ EN /AL
yR
CAMDEN PL.
LIGHT I N D U S T R I L SlVGLE FAM/ Y R SIDE TIAL
T
Q• ~D3 S/ GL F MI Y
~ ~ N ~ ~ R SID NT AL
e W ¢
~ ~ - GERTRUDE PL
y N ~
a ~
o ` 7~~ SINGLE
_2 y y r~
~ ~ m~^ RESIDE TI L
Y
~ ~ r~
W
Z 2 COMMERCIAL ANAHURST PL.
Q
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SI GLE
2 ~ W p~ FA 1LY
~ m> RES DENTAL
~ ~
- z ~ COMMER /AL
F- a
J J ~ u' MAYWOOD AV.
= COMMERCIAL
CUP 09-25
t T MOBILE MONOPINE
2100 SOUTH FAIRVIEW STREET
P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y
LAND USE MAP
EXHIBIT 2
31 A-6
~E a ~
~ a ~ ! 1~E ~ ~ ~ ~iBE ~ S ~ Q n i 1ltilo ~ r
~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ o ~~R e ~ ~ g s a ~ o g F~ t~ Q
r¦,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 S ~t ~ i
Cam' b g li _ dy ~
RQ~ e E ~i Y~ Y$ ~tltl~ f Z
iQ ; ~ ~~t ~ a ~~iE~ a ~E ;6 ~ ~ /
iQ a~ ~ ~9~~~ ~
~5 i i4 ~ ~r e i
~g E !C ~~yp~ ~ e{p~ 8~~~~SRLg ~ i ~a gjq ~AIR~E~
CR ~ 4"~ l~i ~ iXE ~ §R i S•/
i
_ i
' '
~ ~ ~ - -
I
w ""a" i ~
-
i g
1
i
_ ~ e
-
~ , ___~~,b ~iq
i ~
I ~
~I . 1
Y ~I 1
q ~
$
e ~ i ~
~ ~ A
Q ` I II 1
/ i~ i 1 I ~ i'
~ ~ ~
i ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E i ~i
E i _ Q
aE y~y~R~ E e ~ -
gg yy a g~ ~
P~ p ~ B i 1 ~E ~ ~ \ p~ \
5~
~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~
~ ~ ~ ~
R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
EXHIBIT 3
~1 D_7
i
I o~ R a a~
1 g ~ kk
Q~ ~a 7~~~as~E ~~l~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~S ~~R~ ~g N
~ $ °f ~ ~i. W z
~e ~ ~
Z~ ~'n
- _ m a i
Q i z ~ o$~ i ~ ,
. ~ i W ~
_ Q i ~ E
~p ~ ~ ~ A~-~ ~
~ ~y
4~ ~ e ~ b f y
o JQ~ pRpR
yeya E P fly E~ I -
i~ '
g€y ~ \ \ \ r
~C~ \ ~ r
~ rt. .
,,y F-
I
r• i
'v ~
i c ~c
~~a€ ~
~ ~ ~g
m
0
W
i~
Z
W
{11 R yE ~ ~Ri k 2 R PJ
~Q Q ~Z~~ ~ 9~ 9 ~~e ~ ~ ~ Y
y~* ~ ~ E~~ ~ E
~~a !e l ~RpQ
~4a~ y g
4 ~ o ~ ~ C^ i E- •E
§ r N ~ ~ E- ~ i O
o ~ E ~ ~ ~ E_ E. g 5
~ ~gQ yg . rte.' :r..+. ~ e W
C ~ 1-.. r.e f-s ..-a a-.•• ~ d
s-i~ 8
¦r.uua nwaow sm 3o-a W
EXHIBIT 4
R1 D_R
~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ : ~ I ~ a
~ E lQ1 g3 O~$=~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ m t~ Ii~~~ ~
¦
r¦,~ ~ p~ ~ y ~a 8 8 B=~ ~ S
N
g " g ~
rs
.,.a,.. n.
iifgE p ° ~ 7
~iE
ri,
F'_
r`n~ ~
5~
~ n~
~p
1
w .
0 YM
~ ~
a~
x~ ~
g
~ ~i
~ ~ ~ g 3
~ ha ~ 8
~ pp ' a~~~ ~r~ a~ a e~ ~r~f
9 i P a E~ r ~ ~ o. a ~ ~ * E c ~ ~
Fao `xE ~~3~~ ~E~ tie
g9 9a p ie3 9g a9 Q Y Y5 =
~p4pa R {4i ~ ~ i i ~ ¢®E6 ~ ~ ~qqq~ ~§(R i ¢pF ~Ey o4~ i~ ~ ~e
SEC i~~~~~~~~F~{q!~ W k'~~96~Y~fi~~~~~ W
ff e ~ i f
EXHIBIT 5
~
1~_A
~E~~ ~
~ E ~a Q 9 e,~ ~;1 I s ~ a ~ ~ ~ v e~ ~ z
~ ~ _ 1~~~~~~ ~s~a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~3 Y~ F
~ ~ i~ ~ ~ Q
~ a~~g~ ~ s ~ g o s ~ ~ ~ ~g~ ~
r
Y
q .f~i Qpzzrr
r.+.
ey ru e
S
ij ~y3 >a ~ p
~ ~~~~4~
~~~~g~~ ~~~~~g~~
~
~ ~
~e I ~ ~ 8 -
~
8
Y
iA~
G AA
ti p..
~Y~ ~ aMOlw 11011-1. IGp~JY Ti ~
E
~ '~~Q
g ~
~ ~y~
E ~
~ ~ ~ Y ~
~ ~ g
~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
R
R
~ 8 ; ~I
g ~ y s R Y F~ R Y~ >i
9 ~ RR R ~i~ Y ~ i~ R~ 9 ~ R Q ~Q Y ~
~ ~~9~~ g~~gE}~ ~~H
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Yi ~ ~ la ~ Y Y ~ E ~ ~ ~i
ff ~.i a gY~~ ~
~~~~I~~ to ~~~~I~~
<F a~ a a a~ . a~ s ~ Ki~ W 'gyp ~ L i 4 W
C ` ~i ~
EXHIBIT 6
~1 A-10
bk 2/3/10
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 2009-25 TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A 60-FOOT HIGH MONOPINE AT
2100 SOUTH FAIRVIEW STREET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-25 came before the Planning
Commission of the City of Santa Ana for a duly noticed public hearing on
February 8, 2010.
B. Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-25 has been filed with the City of Santa
Ana seeking to allow the construction of a 60-foot high monopine at 2100
South Fairview Street.
C. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-198.10, a Conditional
Use Permit is required for major wireless facilities.
D. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning
Commission to grant a conditional use permit upon making certain
findings.
1. Will the proposed use provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the
community?
The proposed 60-foot tall cellular residents, businesses and
motorists who subscribe to T-Mobile services by reducing the
gaps in digital cellular service and providing additional calling
capacity for its users, especially for those users traveling
within the central sector of Santa Ana monopine will provide a
service to Santa Ana.
2. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular case
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity?
Resolution No. 2010-03
Page 1 of 6
31 A-11
Federal law exempts local jurisdictions from regulating health
related issues as these issues are covered under Federal
laws. However, the proposed facility will be in compliance
with both the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations
3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic stability
or future economic development of properties surrounding the area?
The proposed monopine, in conjunction with the existing
landscaping, will be compatible with the surrounding area and
will not adversely affect the economic viability in the area.
The stealth appearance will be the major solution to
maintaining and increasing the economic stability for this
industrial area.
4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in Chapter 41 for such use?
The cellular facility has been designed to comply with the
regulations and conditions identified in Chapter 41 of the
Santa Ana Municipal Code for a major wireless facility.
5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any
specific plan of the City?
The proposed monopine facility will not adversely affect the
General Plan as cellular facilities that are designed to be
compatible with the surrounding environment are consistent
with the goals and objectives of the Industrial (IND) General
Plan designation.
E. This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the
California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt
from further review pursuant to Section 15303. This Class 3 exemption
allows in-fill developments for the construction and location of limited
numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Categorical Exemption
Environmental Review No. 2009-151 will be filed for this project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission after conducting the public hearing hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-25 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at
the above said hearing, which includes but is not limited to: the Request for Planning
Commission Action dated February 8, 2010 and exhibits attached thereto; and the
public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 8t" day of February, 2010 by the following vote:
Resolution No. 2010-03
Page 2 of 6
31 A-12
AYES: Commissioners: Alderete, Betancourt, Leo, Turner (4)
NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSENT: Commissioners: Gartner, Yrarrazaval (2)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0)
Christopher Leo
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By:
Benjamin Kaufman
Chief Assistant City Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Martha Ramirez, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the
attached Resolution No. 2010-03 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning
Commi
sslon of the City of Santa Ana on February 8, 2010
Date:
Planning Commission Secretary
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2010-03
Page 3 of 6
31 A-13
Conditions for Approval for Conditional Use Permit No 2009-25
Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-25 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana
Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards
Code and all other applicable regulations.
The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below riot to
exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the
life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may
result in the revocation of the conditional use permit.
A. Planninp Division
1. The applicant must comply with all conditions and requirements of the
Development Review Committee for the development project (DP 2009-56).
2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the
Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if
administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit must be
amended.
3. The proposed monopine shall be constructed as per approved plans and
the existing landscaping shall be protected in place during the construction
period for the 60-foot monopine facility.
4. The proposed monopine shall be constructed per the following
specifications:
a. The monopine should have 3.1 branches per foot for full density
coverage with limited spacing between the branches; 70 percent of the
branches should be eight feet or longer.
b. Branch disbursement should be random so that longer branches and
shorter branches are intermingled to give a natural appearance.
c. Branches should exceed all antennas by a minimum of 12 inches.
d. Branches should start at 15 feet above the ground.
EXHIBIT "A"
Resolution No. 2010-03
Page 4 of 6
31A-14
e. There should be a minimum space of seven feet between the top of
the antenna and the top of the branches.
f. Branches should have an upward sweep similar to that of actual
Canary Island Pines.
g. Branch foliage color should be an olive green with some brown
"needles" to match an actual Canary Island Pine. A sample should be
submitted for approval prior to fabrication.
h. Full bark cladding with a custom color should be submitted for approval
prior to fabrication.
i. All antennas shall be covered with "pine antenna socks" that match the
approved foliage color.
j. All "stand-off mounts" and support pipe mounts shall be concealed
behind antennas and painted a darker shade or green (or black) with a
"flat" paint finish to reduce reflection and visibility of the mounting.
k. Include the tree specifications (selected manufacturers and models)
with photo simulations (also a site plan review requirement).
I. Show the location of the GPS antenna on all elevations.
m. Provide a "unistrut" detail for the utility cabinet; an "H-frame" is not
acceptable.
n. Provide a note on the plans stating "install underground utilities
sleeving for two carriers during construction of the structure". Shrouds
on the outside of the pole are not acceptable.
o. All exterior conduit and electrical meters shall be installed and
screened in one metal enclosure painted to match the structure.
5. The permit applicant recognizes that the frequencies used by the cellular
facility located at 2100 South Fairview Street are extremely close to the
frequencies used by the City of Santa Ana for Public Safety. This
proximity will require extraordinary "comprehensive advanced planning
and frequency coordination" engineering measures to prevent
interference, especially in the choice of frequencies and radio ancillary
hardware. This is encouraged in the "Best Practices Guide" published by
the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International,
Incorporated (APCO), and as endorsed by the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC). Prior to the issuance of any permits to install the
facility, (permit applicant) shall meet in good faith to coordinate the use of
Resolution No. 2010-03
Page 5 of 6
31 A-15
frequencies and equipment with the Communications Division of the
Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department to minimize, to the greatest
extent possible, any interference with the Public Safety 800 MHz
Countywide Coordinated Communications System (CCCS). Similar
consideration shall be given to any other existing or proposed wireless
communications facility that may be located on the subject property.
6. At all times, the permit applicant shall not prevent the City of Santa Ana
from having adequate spectrum capacity on the City's 800 MHz radio
frequency.
7. Before activating its facility, the permit applicant will submit to a post-
installation test to confirm that "advanced planning and frequency
coordination" of the facility was successful in not interfering with the City of
Santa Ana Public Safety radio equipment. This test will be conducted by
the Communications Division of the Orange County Sheriff-Coroner
Department or a Division-approved contractor at the expense of the
applicant. This post-installation testing process shall be repeated for
every proposed frequency addition and/or change to confirm the intent of
the "frequency planning" process has been met.
8. The permit applicant shall provide a 24-hour phone number to which
interference problems may be reported. This condition will also apply to
all existing facilities in the City of Santa Ana.
9. The permit applicant will provide a "single point of contact" in its
Engineering and Maintenance Departments to insure continuity on all
interference issues. The name, telephone number, fax number and a-mail
address of that person shall be provided to the City's designated
representative upon activation of the facility.
10. The permit applicant shall insure that lessee or other user(s) shall comply
with the terms and conditions of this permit, and shall be responsible for
the failure of any lessee or other users under the control of permit
applicant to comply.
11. The permit applicant shall provide a coverage and cell site location map
for each existing and proposed facility in Santa Ana.
12. Locate all equipment and related appurtenances (appleton plug and
electric meter) on the inside of the existing equipment enclosure or inside
the building and underground all electrical power from the utility source
shown on the approved site plan.
13. Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-25 expires 10 years from the date of City
Council approval.
Resolution No. 2010-03
Page 6 of 6
31 A-16