Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence - Item 15 Becerra, Alexis From: Alex Michel Michel <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 7:11 AM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Alex Michel Michel z Becerra, Alexis From: Jennifer Salmon <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 12:44 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Jennifer Salmon z Becerra, Alexis From: Adolfo M Ochoa < Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 9:16 AM To: eComment Subject: Please Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Adolfo M Ochoa z Becerra, Alexis From: Nathalie Arenas <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 10:25 AM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Nathalie Arenas z Becerra, Alexis From: Alexis Serrato <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 4:53 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Alexis Serrato z Becerra, Alexis From: Gyzeht Delgado <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 5:16 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Gyzeht Delgado z Becerra, Alexis From: Zora Mihaley <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 6:34 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Zora Mihaley z Becerra, Alexis From: Chirag Shah <maxbrealpowers@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 6:48 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Chirag Shah z Becerra, Alexis From: Bryan Vicente <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 8:02 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Bryan Vicente z Becerra, Alexis From: Marysol Aguirre <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 12:02 AM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Marysol Aguirre z Becerra, Alexis From: Karina Paredes <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 11:35 AM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Karina Paredes z Becerra, Alexis From: Courtney Calderon <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 5:49 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Courtney Calderon z Becerra, Alexis From: Lorena Romero <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 8:45 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Lorena Romero z Becerra, Alexis From: Marco Bustos <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 9:57 PM To: eComment Subject: Vote No on Item 29: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPID has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. Marco Bustos z Becerra, Alexis From: Teri Saydak < Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 11:42 AM To: eComment Subject: Please vote NO on item 29 the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 29, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: -Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPD has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission's ability to make disciplinary recommendations. -Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversite, not more empty promises. Thank you, Teri Saydak Santa Ana resident i Flores, Dora From:María Baeza <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 4:24 PM To:eComment Subject:Vote No on Item 15: Defend the Santa Ana Police Oversight Commission Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. Santa Ana City Council, Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose item 15, the proposed amendments to the Police Oversight Commission ordinance being considered at your July 1st meeting. The original vision behind the Commission was to ensure that our city had independent oversight of police conduct, something the people of Santa Ana have long demanded. But these amendments would undermine that goal by: - Stripping the Commission of its power to conduct independent investigations. - Limiting its review powers to only certain types of complaints, and only after SAPD has already completed its own Internal Affairs review. - Eliminating the Commission’s ability to make disciplinary recommendations. - Cutting off communication between the Commission and City leadership. - Blocking the Commission from engaging with the public. - Requiring Commissioners to undergo police-led trainings instead of independent ones. These are not minor adjustments, they are deliberate efforts to weaken accountability and transparency. If passed, these changes will turn the Commission into a symbolic body with no real power to protect the public or prevent harm. 1 I urge you to vote NO on these amendments and honor the intent and purpose of the Police Oversight Commission. The people of Santa Ana deserve real oversight, not more empty promises. María Baeza Santa Ana , California 92707 2 Flores, Dora From:Tiffany Bailey <TBailey@aclusocal.org> Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 4:51 PM To:eComment Subject:Written Comment for Agenda Item 15 Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. Good evening, My name is Tiffany Bailey. I am the Deputy Project Director of the ACLU of Southern California’s Criminal Justice and Police Practices project. I am providing public comment on agenda item 15 concerning proposed amendments to the police oversight commission. The ACLU SoCal has reviewed the extensive proposed amendments to the ordinance and I’m here to provide comment on our grave concerns about how these amendments will serve only to eliminate critical oversight powers and transparency measures—changes that will surely result in a weakened Commission that is unable to carry out its oversight functions. Of our many concerns, I wanted to raise three: First, the amendments completely remove the independent investigations component of the ordinance, eliminating a critical component that community members asked for and which serves as a guardrail to ensure that the Commission does not just merely rubber stamp the actions of law enforcement but truly oversees their actions. In quite a disturbing fashion, the confidentiality section now provides that civil or criminal penalties can be attached for any confidentiality breaches. This is unnecessary because there is already state laws governing disclosure of law enforcement personnel records in state penal code 832.7. Also, given what we have seen unfold in LA with the prosecution of Diana Teran - for which the court of appeal issued a writ of prohibition against further prosecutorial proceedings other than dismissal last month after more than a year of litigation, it’s a dangerous precedent that will surely have a chilling effect on oversight. Finally, the amendments narrows the types of complaints that can be reviewed. For certain categories of misconduct like sexual assault and dishonesty, it only allows for Commission review if SAPD’s IA has made a sustained finding of misconduct. This is deeply problematic because it practically means that egregious misconduct like sexually assaulting civilians is only reviewable if SAPD itself has already sustained that finding. That’s not how oversight is supposed to work. The oversight body can’t be limited to reviewing cases that the department has already sustained. I think this may be a mistaken importing of language in SB 16 into a context that simply does not work. In short, the community fought long and hard for this Council to bring an effective oversight body to Santa Ana and with the appointment of the recent Oversight Director, the City is on the precipice of actualizing the independent oversight and transparency goals detailed in the establishing ordinance. Now is not the time to make sweeping changes that will gut the Commission’s power. An oversight body that provides the appearance of community-focused transparency and accountability that it ultimately cannot and will not deliver, is far worse than no oversight body at all. We urge the City Council to reject any proposed amendments. If the City Council is unwilling to do so at this time, we ask that the City Attorney prepare a detailed memo explaining precisely how these changes are necessary to abide by POBR as the staff report merely cites to the entire statute. Without further explanation and analysis, to my eye, many of these changes are policy-based and they are bad policy. The community deserves and needs more information from the City to better understand the proposed changes. Thank you, Tiffany 1 Tiffany Bailey Deputy Project Director of Criminal Justice and Police Practices Munger, Tolles & Olson Senior Staff Attorney ACLU of Southern California 1313 W. Eighth Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.977.5202 THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 2