HomeMy WebLinkAboutNATIONAL OPIOID SETTLEMENT - SECONDARY MANUFACTURERS SETTLEMENTDocusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
A-2025-161
o:CAo (0) OCT 2025
Laur0.Ros5ini/
powiOl Quintanp 02)
EXHIBIT K
Secondary Manufacturers' Combined Subdivision Participation and Release Form
("Combined Participation Form")
Governmental Entity: Santa Ana city
State: CA
Authorized Official: Alvaro Nunez
Address 1: 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-31
Address 2: P.O. Box 1988
City, State, Zip: Santa Ana, CA 92702
Phone: 714-647-5220
Email: ANufiez@santa-ana.org
The governmental entity identified above ("Governmental Entity"), in order to obtain and
in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to each of the
settlements which are listed in paragraph 1 below (each a "Secondary Manufacturer's Settlement"
and collectively, "the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements"), and acting through the
undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in each of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities in each of the
Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements, and agrees as follows.
1. The Participating Entity hereby elects to participate in each of the following Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements as a Participating Entity:
a. Settlement Agreement for Alvogen, Inc. dated April 4, 2025.
b. Settlement Agreement for Apotex Corp. dated April 4, 2025.
C. Settlement Agreement for Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC dated April 4, 2025.
d. Settlement Agreement for Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. dated April 4, 2025.
e. Settlement Agreement for Indivior Inc. dated April 4, 2025.
f. Settlement Agreement for Viatris Inc. ("Mylan") dated April 4, 2025.
g. Settlement Agreement for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. dated April 4, 2025.
h. Settlement Agreement for Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. dated April 4, 2025.
2. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed each of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements, understands that all capitalized terms not defined in this
Combined Participation Form have the meanings defined in each of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements, and agrees that by executing this Combined Participation
Form, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in each of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements and become a Participating Subdivision as provided in each of
the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements.
3. The Governmental Entity shall promptly, and in any event no later than 14 days after the
Reference Date and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, dismiss with prejudice any
Released Claims that it has filed against any Released Entity in each of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements. With respect to any Released Claims pending in In re
National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, the Governmental Entity
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
authorizes the Plaintiffs' Executive Committee to execute and file on behalf of the
Governmental Entity a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice for each of the
manufacturers listed in paragraph 1 above substantially in the form found at
hops: //nationalopioidsettlement. com/additional-settlements/.
4. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of each of the Secondary Manufacturers'
Settlements pertaining to Participating Subdivisions as defined therein.
5. By agreeing to the terms of each of the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements and
becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein,
including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after the Effective Date.
The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through each of the
Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements solely for the purposes provided therein.
7. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the court and agrees to follow the
process for resolving any disputes related to each Secondary Manufacturer's Settlement as
described in each of the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements.'
8. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce each of the Secondary Manufacturers'
Settlements as provided therein.
9. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all
purposes in each of the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements, including without
limitation all provisions related to release of any claims,' and along with all departments,
agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and
attorneys, and any person in his or her official capacity whether elected or appointed to
serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through
any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides
for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity
hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or
to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish
liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in each of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in each of
the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements are intended by the Parties to be broad and shall
be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities in each of the Secondary Manufacturers'
Settlements the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released
' See Settlement Agreement for Alvogen, Inc. Section VILF.2; Settlement Agreement for Apotex Corp. Section
VII.F.2; Settlement Agreement for Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC Section VII.F.2; Settlement Agreement for Hikma
Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Section VII.F.2; Settlement Agreement for Indivior Section VI.F.2; Settlement Agreement
for Mylan Section VI.F.2; Settlement Agreement for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. Section VII.F.2; Settlement
Agreement for Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. Section VII.F.2.
'See Settlement Agreement for Alvogen, Inc. Section XI; Settlement Agreement for Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Section X; Settlement Agreement for Apotex Corp. Section XI; Settlement Agreement for Hikma Pharmaceuticals
USA Inc. Section XI; Settlement Agreement for Indivior Section X; Settlement Agreement for Mylan Section X;
Settlement Agreement for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. Section XI; Settlement Agreement for Zydus
Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. Section XI.
Rill, °
K-2
0
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release
claims. Each of the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements shall be a complete bar to any
Released Claim against that manufacturer's Released Entities.
10. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating
Subdivision as set forth in each of the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements.
11. In connection with the releases provided for in each of the Secondary Manufacturers'
Settlements, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges
any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of
the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar,
comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:
General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that
the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her
favor at the time of executing the release that, if known by him or her would
have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released
party.
A Releasor may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows,
believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Released Claims in each of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements, but each Governmental Entity hereby expressly waives and
fully, finally, and forever settles, releases and discharges, upon the Effective Date, any and
all Released Claims that may exist as of such date but which Releasors do not know or
suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault
whatsoever, and which, if known, would materially affect the Governmental Entities'
decision to participate in each of the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements.
12. The Governmental Entity understands and acknowledges that each of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements is an independent agreement with its own terms and
conditions. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of any of the
Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees, aside
from the exceptions in paragraph 13 below. To the extent this Combined Participation
Form is interpreted differently from any of the Secondary Manufacturers' Settlements in
any respect, the individual Secondary Manufacturer's Settlement controls.
13. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event that some but not all of the Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements proceed past their respective Reference Dates, all releases and
other commitments or obligations shall become void only as to those Secondary
Manufacturers' Settlements that fail to proceed past their Reference Dates. All releases and
other commitments or obligations (including those contained in this Combined
Participation Form) shall remain in full effect as to each Secondary Manufacturer's
Settlement that proceeds past its Reference Date, and this Combined Participation Form
need not be modified, returned, or destroyed as long as any Secondary Manufacturer's
Settlement proceeds past its Reference Date.
0�, 0
K-3 s
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Combined Partici tion Form
on behalf of the Governmental Entity.
Signature:
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: City Manager
Date: & �^�
Approved as to Form:
�owvo- �,
Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
A TTFQT-
K-4
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Alvogen Settlement
1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Alvogen Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision
thereto (the "Alvogen Settlement Agreement"), including Section VI and Exhibit O, the State of
California proposes this agreement (the "CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement") to govern the
allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to
Sections V and VI of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this
agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Section X of the Alvogen Settlement
Agreement.
Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this
CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a
Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or
greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating
Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding
Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Alvogen Settlement Agreement.
b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in
California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA
Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or
through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of
California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.
d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a
West -Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. ("Mylan"); Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co.,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS
Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc.,
Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna
Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer
D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies
related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any
state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement, as well as
applicable law, and the Alvogen Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision
of this CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Alvogen Allocation
Agreement have the same meaning as in the Alvogen Settlement Agreement unless otherwise
defined herein.
Pursuant to Section VI(D)(1) of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund
payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VI(B)(2) of the
Alvogen Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund
payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.
This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California' pursuant to Section X of the
Alvogen Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees and the
Additional Remediation Amount.
4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Alvogen Settlement Agreement,
shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and
15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from
the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement, and
15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California
Allocation"), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts
Fund"), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund").
A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by
the State for future Opioid Remediation.
B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be
allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed
negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as
adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or
' For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of
California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of
California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
Dr" W0
2
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in
Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For
the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and
counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its
Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision,
and will receive payments as provided in the Alvogen Settlement Agreement.
C) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating
Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its
share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a
AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the
"Distributors Settlement"), that city's Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to
the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the
Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change
in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment
Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to
be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the
county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance
with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in
accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct
payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share,
with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund
Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Alvogen
Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and
Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating
Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund
that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund,
become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered
within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Alvogen Settlement Agreement
and this CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided
however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must
be transferred to the State.
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or
more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to
the Alvogen Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA
Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will
be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities
within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program;
(2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD") treatment infrastructure;
(3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including
sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted
by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by
providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn)
and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability,
restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited
to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice -impacted youth, youth experiencing
adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or
(6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for
opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but
not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS
will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating
Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Alvogen Settlement
Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private
sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement
Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for
Opioid Remediation consistent with the Alvogen Settlement Agreement and this CA
Alvogen Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among
themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating
Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being
reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds
must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may
regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Alvogen Settlement Agreement
and this CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement
Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Alvogen Settlement Agreement or this CA
Alvogen Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from
any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA
Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the
concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the
Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to
meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and
confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise
enforce the requirements of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement or this CA Alvogen
Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be
brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on
which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this
agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or
constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits,
investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal
enforcement actions.
C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the
Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used,
subject to any limits imposed by the Alvogen Settlement Agreement and this CA
o 0
5 p .
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Alvogen Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past
opioid-related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.
However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision
Funds be used for litigation -related fees and expenses.
D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee
agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its
contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement
agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its
share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee counsel
("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Alvogen Settlement
Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any
payments to contingency -fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such
Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision's total gross recovery under
this Alvogen Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments
made under a State Back -Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid
Abatement use requirements under Section VI.B.1 of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement. Before
seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private counsel
representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney
Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Alvogen Settlement Agreement. Further, private
counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of
Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California
Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the
request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and
its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney
General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into
agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or
enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any
duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without
limitation the Attorney General.
N
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the
settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports
will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of fiends from the settlement
will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those
funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a
certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the
settlement have been used in compliance with the Alvogen Settlement Agreement and
this CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably
determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with
representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts
Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible
solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for
oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city
within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions'
expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will
be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision.
d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and
expenditures, as required by the Alvogen Settlement Agreement and this CA Alvogen
Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the
CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must
identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used,
including if used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to
Section VI(B)(2) of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement, such information must also be
reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Alvogen.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to
discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the
State and Participating Subdivisions.
6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA
Alvogen Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet
and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated
motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Alvogen Settlement Agreement, this CA Alvogen Allocation
Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
0* 0
7
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable
by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this
agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of
such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this
agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d) Except as provided in the Alvogen Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be
governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
The undersigned, Santa Ana city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California
State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Alvogen
Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Alvogen Settlement and
ACCEPTS this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Alvogen Settlement. _
Signature: %`(/yy�-�y
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: _City Manager
Date: 6L4 21
Approved as to Form:
Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights,
releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and
Use of Settlement Funds—Alvogen Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not
change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.13.e., the State of California will receive the
Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA
Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not
an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the
California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.13. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant
to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -
hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
100-000% 100.000% l(in nnn°/
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County
Alarnerla County
Alameda
2.332%
2.853%
2.4237952%
City
Alameda
Alameda
0.069%
0.0570162%
city
Albany
Alameda
0.013%
0.0107768%
City
Berkeley
Alameda
0.152%
0.1249656%
city
Dublin
Alameda
0.033%
0.040%
0.0338810%
City
Emeryville
Alameda
0.023%
0.0185765%
City
Fremont
Alameda
0.108%
0.0888576%
city
Hayward
Alameda
0.117%
0.0966218%
city
Livermore
Alameda
0.054%
0.0446740%
city
Newark
Alameda
0.026%
0.0217626%
city
Oakland
Alameda
0.486%
0.595%
0.5055601%
city
Piedmont
Alameda
0.014%
0.0114064%
city
Pleasanton
Alameda
0.067%
0.0554547%
city
San Leandro
Alameda
0.039%
0.0321267%
city
Union City
Alameda
0.043%
0.0352484%
County
A),nador County
Amador
0.226%
0.277%
0.23498857
Count
Butte County
Butte
1.615%
1.975%
1783178%
city
Chico
Butte
0.216%
0.264%
0.2246499%
city
Oroville
Butte
0.079%
0.0646595%
County
Calaveras Count,
Calaveras
0.226%
0.277%
0.2351644%
County
Colusa Count,
Colusa
0.059%
0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa
2.102%
2.571%
2.1844585%
City
Antioch
Contra Costa
0.037%
0.0301879%
City
Brentwood
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0215339%
city
Clayton
Contra Costa
0.002%
0.0018060%
city
Concord
Contra Costa
0.055%
0.0456676%
city
Danville
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0082255%
Citv
El Cerrito
Contra Costa
0.023%
0.0189024%
city
Hercules
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Ancatiion
Percents e
city
Lafayette
Contra Costa
0.006%
1
0.0046030%
❑ ❑
13 ;,
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Martinez
Contra Costa
0.012%
0.0098593%
city
Mora a
Contra Costa
0.004%
0.0031007%
City
Oakley
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0079416%
city
Orbida
Contra Costa
0.005%
0.0038157%
city
Pinole
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0110909%
City
Pittsbur
Contra Costa
0.053%
0.0436369%
city
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0106309%
city
Richmond
Contra Costa
0.146%
0.1201444%
city
San Pablo
Contra Costa
0.018%
0.0148843%
City
San Ramon
Contra Costa
0.021%
0.0176459%
City
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte
0.114%
0.140%
0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado
0.768%
0.939%
0.7980034%
city
Placerville
El Dorado
0.015%
0.0127642%
city
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
0.081%
0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno
1.895%
2.318%
1.9693410%
city
Clovis
Fresno
0.065%
0.0536211%
City
Coalinga
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098554%
city
Fresno
Fresno
0.397%
0.3270605%
city
Kerman
Fresno
0.005%
0.0042534%
city
Kingsburg
Fresno
0.008%
0.0066167%
City
Mendota
Fresno
0.002%
0.0019387%
city
Orange Cove
Fresno
0.004%
0.0035607%
city
Parlier
Fresno
0.008%
0.0069755%
city
Reedlev
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098804%
City
Sanger
Fresno
0.018%
0.0146135%
City
Selma
Fresno
0.015%
0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn
0.107%
0.131%
0.1116978%
Count
Humboldt Coun
Humboldt
1.030%
1.260%
1.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Arcata
Humboldt
0.054%
0.0447660%
city
Eureka
Humboldt
0.117%
0.143%
0.1216284%
city
Fortuna
Humboldt
0.032%
0.0266837%
County
Imperial Coun
Imperial
0.258%
0.315%
0.2679006%
city
Brawley
Imperial
0.011%
0.0087986%
f7 :t7
2of
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Calexico
Imperial
0.019%
0.0152799%
city
El Centro
Imperial
0.158%
0.1302522%
City
Imperial
Imperial
0.006%
0.0048791%
County
Inyo Count<P
In o
0.073%
0.089%
0.0754413%
County
Kern Coun
Kern
2.517%
3.079%
2.6159145%
City
Arvin
Kern
0.006%
0.0046425%
city
Bakersfield
Kern
0.212%
0.1747198%
city
California City
Kern
0.009%
0.0070820%
City
Delano
Kern
0.030%
0.0249316%
city
McFarland
Kern
0.003%
0.0025644%
city
Rid ecrest
Kern
0.015%
0.0120938%
city
Shafter
Kern
0.013%
0.0103417%
City
Tehachapi
Kern
0.009%
0.0073580%
city
Wasco
Kern
0.008%
0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings
0.293%
0.2413469%
city
Avenal
Kings
0.007%
0.005633.5%
city
Corcoran
Kings
0.01300
0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings
0.027%
0.0226038%
city
Lemoore
Kings
0.016%
0.0131900%
County
Lake Counh�
Lake
0.795%
0.6545389%
city
Clearlake
Lake
0.041%
0.050%
0.0426253%
City
Lakeport
Lake
0.021%
0.026%
0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen
0.319%
0.391%
0.3320610%
City
Susanville
Lassen
0.027%
0.0219295%
County
Los An e%s �
Los An eles
13.896%
16.999%
14.4437559%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Aflcation
Percentage
city
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040024%
City
Alhambra
Los Angeles
0.042%
0.0343309%
city
Arcadia
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0267718%
city
Artesia
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0005100%
city
Azusa
Los Angeles
0.026%
0.0210857%
City
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
0.027%
0.0218520%
City
Bell
Los Angeles
0.008%
0.0068783%
City
Bellflower
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0014485%
City
Bell Gardens
Los Angeles
0.014%
0.0114301%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E52ABEFSOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Beverly Hills
Los An eles
0.065%
0.0534897%
City
Burbank
Los Angeles
0.100%
0.0823132%
City,
Calabasas
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048948%
city
Carson
Los An eles
0.019%
0.0159805%
Citv
Cerritos
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039682%
City
Claremont
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0082584%
City
Commerce
Los An eles
0.000%
0.0002971%
City
Compton
Los Angeles
0.044%
0.0361882%
city
Covina
Los Angeles
0.028%
0.0229127%
City
Cudahy
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006020%
city
Culver City
Los Angeles
0.055%
0.0449894%
City
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006993%
City
Downey
Los Angeles
0.052%
0.0429994%
City
Duarte
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0027261%
city
El Monte
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.038%
0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0268020%
City
Gardena
Los Angeles
0.034%
0.0278088%
city
Glendale
Los Angeles
0.166%
0.1366586%
city
Glendora
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134411%
city
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040549%
City
Hawthorne
Los Angeles
0.050%
0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0145307%
City
Huntington Park
Los Angeles
0.023%
0.0190667%
city
Inglewood
Los Angeles
0.059%
0.0489195%
city
La Canada Flintrid e
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0025565%
city
Lakewood
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039971%
city
La Mirada
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0081572%
city
Lancaster
Los Angeles
0.045%
0.0369689%
-City
La Puente
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012999%
City
La Verne
Los Angeles
0.024%
0.0194190%
City
Lawndale
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0017731%
city
Lomita
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0031940%
city
Long Beach
Los Angeles
0.439%
0.3614151%
City
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
2.715%
3.321%
2.8218811 %
ElOff
Yj
4of IN
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Lynwood
Los Angeles
0.0160/.
0.0134345%
Ci
Malibu
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0019269%
city
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
0.032%
0,0260686%
Citj
Maywood
Los An eles
0.004%
0.0035528%
Ci
Monrovia
Los Angeles
0,031%
0.02544.55%e
City
Montebello
Los An eles
0,030%
0.0250670%
city
Monterey Park
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0256677%
city
Norwalk
Los An tiles
0.031%
0.0258228%
Ci!j
Palmdale
Los Angeles
0.046%
0.0375827%
city
Palos Verdes Estates
Los An eles
0.006%
0.0053102%
city
Paramount
Los Angeles
0.011%
0.0091483%
city
Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.146%
0.1200524%
Ci
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0183333%
city
Pomona
Los Angeles
0.111%
0.0911933%
city
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012645%
city
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
0.062%
0.0506992%
city
Rosemead
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0028260%
Parhe�pahag=
Subdtvis�on '
Ciassi%eations'..'Percents
Part�cipatmg Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plamtdi -
5ubdrvis�on '
We' -kited
Allcahon
e,A_'
Ci
San Dimas
Los Angeles
0,003%
0.0022016%
city
San Fernando
Los Angeles
0,013%
0.0104837%e
city
San Gabriel
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0147726%
city
San Marino
Los Angeles
0.009%
0.0073791%
city
Santa Clarita
Los An eles
0.022%
0.0178167%
city
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0257531%
Ci
Santa Monica
Los Angeles
0.158%
0.1298513%
city
Sierra Madre
Los An eles
0,006%
0.0048646%
Ci
Signal Hill
Los Angeles
0.010%e
0.0094884%
city
South El Monte
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039603%
city
South Gate
Los An eles
0.020%
0.0166272%
city
South Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.012%
0.0095334%
Ci
Temple Ci
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles
0.112%
0.0919820%
city
Walnut
Los An eles
0.006%
0.0047305%
city
West Covina
Los An Iles
0.049%
0.0404521%
city
West Holl wood
Los An tiles
0.013%
0.0108517%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX I
City
Whittier
Los An eles
0.032%
0.0260581%
COUnty
Madera Counh,
Madera
0.349%
0.427%
0.3630669%
city
Chowchilla
Madera
0.012%
0.0097332%
city
Madera
Madera
0.039%
0.0318441%
County
Marin County
Marin
0.564%
0.690%
0.5861325%
City
Larkspur
Marin
0.015%
0.0124697%
City
NMI Valley
Marin
0.020%
0.0168401%
City
Novato
Marin
0.028%
0.0229824%
City
San Anselmo
Marin
0.009%
0.0078062%
city
San Rafael
Marin
0.089%
0.0729823%
County
Mariposa County
Mariposa
0.084%
0.103%
0.0876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino
0.439%
0.536%
0.4558394%
CityUkiah
Mendocino
0.039%
0.0317153%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Attention
Percentage
Countyo
Merced Coun
Merced
0.551%
0.674%
0.5724262%
CityAtwater
Merced
0.024%
0.0195846%
city
Livingston
Merced
0.006%
0.0045873%
city
Los Banos
Merced
0.020%
0.0165142%
city
Merced
Merced
0.061%
0.0500762%
County
Modoc County
Modoc
0.065%
0.080%
0.0678250%
County
Mono Coun o
Mono
0.023%
0.029%
0.0242606%
County
Monterey County
Monterey
0.908%
1.111%
0.9437083%
City
Greenfield
Monterey
0.006%
0.0050552%
city
King City
Monterey
0.005%
0.0037355%
city
Marina
Monterey
0.017%
0.0144098%
city
Monterey
Monterey
0.041%
0.0336540%
city
Pacific Grove
Monterey
0.009%
0.0074842%
city
Salinas
Monterey
0.094%
0.0776576%
City
Seaside
Monterey
0.023%
0.0191772%
city
Soledad
Monterey
0.007%
0.0060870%
County
Napa County
Napa
0.288%
0.352%
0.2994325%
city
American Canyon
Napa
0.017%
0.0136869%
City
Napa
Napa
0.078%
0.0642783%
County
Nevada Coun
Nevada
0.441%
0.539%
0.4579827%
City
Grass Valley
Nevada
0.024%
0.0197805%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1765-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Truckee
Nevada
0.003%
0.0023843%
County
Orange County
Orange
4.364%
5.339%
4.5363576%
city
Aliso Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0113841%
city
Anaheim
Orange
0.554%
0.678%
0.5759282%
city
Brea
Orange
0.086%
0.0708897%
city
Buena Park
Orange
0.087%
0.0714352%
city
Costa Mesa
Orange
0.124%
0.152%
0.1288366%
city
Cypress
Orange
0.033%
0.0271937%
city
Dana Point
Ora1i e
0.001%
0.0005560%
Participating
Subdivision n
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Fountain Valley
Orange
0.055%
0.0455980%
city
Fullerton
Orange
0.137%
0.168%
0.1425744%
city
Garden Grove
Orange
0.213%
0.1752482%
city
Huntington Beach
Orange
0.247%
0.302%
0.2568420%
City
Irvine
Orange
0.139%
0.170%
0.1442350%
City
Laguna Beach
Orange
0.047%
0.058%
0.0493043%
city
Laguna Hills
Orange
0.014%
0.0115457%
City
Laguna Niguel
Orange
0.001%
0.0007071%
city
Laguna Woods
Orange
0.001%
0.0006546%
City
La Habra
Orange
0.060%
0.073%
0.0621049%
city
Lake Forest
Orange
0.012%
0.0101249%
city
La Palma
Orange
0.012%
0.0095439%
city
Los Alamitos
Orange
0.008%
0.0069190%
city
Mission Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0117560%
City
Newport Beach
Orange
0.179%
0.1470134%
city
Orange
Orange
0.150%
0.1231320%
city
Placentia
Orange
0.029%
0.035%
0.0298912%
city
Rancho Santa Margarita
Orange
0.001%
0.0006296%
city
San Clemente
Orange
0.008%
0.010%
0.0086083%
city
San Juan Capistrano
Orange
0.008%
0.0065510%
city
Santa Ana
Orange
0.502%
0.614%
0.5213866%
city
Seal Beach
Orange
0.020%
0.0165891%
City
Stanton
Orange
0.035%
1
0.0291955%
city
Tustin
Orange
0.073%
0.0600341%
city
Westminster
Orange
0.104%
0.127% 1
0.1082721%
7 o f �0
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Yorba Linda
Orange
0,044%
0.0362223%
-County
Placer County
Placer
1.045%
1.278%
1.0861002%
city
Auburn
Placer
0.017%
0.0141114%
city
Lincoln
Placer
0,031%
0.0255599%
city
Rocklin
Placer
0,076%
0.0625485%
Participating .
S�ibdivis�on :
CA On
Participatmg Subdiwbkii
County
Abatement
Percentage
Ria1° :_
Subdivision'
. percents a-:
Weighted
Allc hon
Percents e.
Ci
Roseville
Placer
0.196%
0.1616559%
County
Plumas County
Plumas
0.205%
0,251%
0.2128729%
CounLy
Riverside County
Riverside
4.534%
5.547%
4.7128296%
city
Banning
Riverside
0.017%
0,0143848%
city
Beaumont
Riverside
0.021%
0.0171135%
city
Blythe
Riverside
0.012%
0.0096714%
city
Can on Lake
Riverside
0.000%
0.0001761%
city
Cathedral City
Riverside
0.067%
0.0553614%
city
Coachella
Riverside
0.021%
0,0173054%
Cit
Corona
Riverside
0.147%
0.1207083%
city
Desert Hot Springs
Riverside
0,024%
0.0200433%
Ci
Eastvale
Riverside
0.000%
0.0002747%
City
Hemet
Riverside
0.051%
0.0421792%
CL
Indio
Riverside
0.056%
0.0457794%
Ci
Juru a Valley
Riverside
0.001%
0.0008991%
Ci
Lake Elsinore
Riverside
0.021%
0.0172949%
city
La Quinta
Riverside
0.063%
0.0516732%
city
Menifee
Riverside
0.032%
0.0260909%
Ci!j
Moreno ValleZ
Riverside
0.137%
0.1130348%
city
Murrieta
Riverside
0.048%
0.059%
0.0497423%
City
Norco
Riverside
0.016%
0.0134542%
city
Palm Desert
Riverside
0.083%
0.0682465%
city
Palm S rin s
Riverside
0.076%e
0.0629862%
city
Perris
Riverside
0.009%
0,0076774%
city
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
0.052%
0.0431098%
city
Riverside
Riverside
0.268%
0.2206279%
city
San Jacinto
Riverside
0.010%
0.0083936%
city
Temecula
Riverside
0.022%
0.0180086%
city
Wildomar
Riverside
0.008%
0.0062500%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Counri
Sacramento County
Sacramento
3.797%
4.645%
3.9465887%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Citrus Heights
Sacramento
0.057%
0.0465312%
City
Elk Grove
Sacramento
0.130%
0.1066994%
City
Folsom
Sacramento
0.108%
0.0890850%
City
Galt
Sacramento
0.017%
0.0143704%
City
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento
0.009%
0.0067679%
city
Sacramento
Sacramento
0.721%
0.882%
0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito
0.106%
0.130%
0.1101417%
City
Hollister
San Benito
0.027%
0.0225355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino
3.259%
3.987%
3.3878124%
city
Adelanto
San Bernardino
0.008%
0.0066640%
city
Apple Valley
San Bernardino
0.025%
0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino
0.015%
0.0122056%
city
Chino
San Bernardino
0.064%
0.0525893%
city
Chino Hills
San Bernardino
0.001%
0.0006388%
City
Colton
San Bernardino
0.031%
0.0253443%
City
Fontana
San Bernardino
0.112%
0.0920543%
city
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino
0.006%
0.0051051%
city
Hesperia
San Bernardino
0.035%
0.0291522%
City
Highland
San Bernardino
0.004%
0.0029061%
City
Loma Linda
San Bernardino
0.009%
0.0071188%
city
Montclair
San Bernardino
0.039%
0.0322108%
city
Ontario
San Bernardino
0.179%
0.1472934%
City
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino
0.084%
0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San Bernardino
0.057%
0.0469150%
City
Rialto
San Bernardino
0.073%
0.0603206%
city
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
0.178%
0.1461880%
city
Twent nine Palms
San Bernardino
0.002%
0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino
0.052%
0.0424460%
City
Victorville
San Bernardino
0.033%
0.0269400%
City
Yucaipa
San Bernardino
0.016%
0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percents e
11
9of p.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5.459A.93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino
0.003%
0.0021228%
County
San Diego County
San Die o
5.706%
6,9800/o
5.9309748%
city
Carlsbad
San Die o
0.128%
0.1050485%
city
Chula Vista
San Diego
0.189%
0.231%
0.1961456%
city
Coronado
San Diego
0,044%
0,0359095%
city
El Cajon
San Diego
0.113%
0.0933582%e
city
Encinitas
San Diego
0.061%
0.074%
0.0630289%
city
Escondido
San Dielzo
0.145%
0.1192204%
Ci
Imperial Beach
San Die o
0.014%
0.0118283%
CiLy
La Mesa
San Diego
0.055%
0.068%
0.0575593%
Ci
Lemon Grove
San Diego
0.022%
0.018 9911%
city
National City
San Die o
0.080%
0.0656808%
city
Oceanside
San Die o
0.213%
0.1753428%
city
POW21
San Diego
0.062%
0.0511040%
City
San Diego
San Diego
1.975%
2.416%
2,0531169%
city
San Marcos
San Die o
0.089%
0.0733897%
citySantee
San Die o
0.033%
0,0268401%
Ci
Solana Beach
San Die o
0.017%
0.0138564%
City
Vista
San Diego
0.052%e
0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco
3.026%
3.702%
3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin County
San Joaquin
1.680%
2.055%
1.7460399%
Ci
Lathrop
San Joaquin
0.009%
0.0075394%
city
Lodi
San Joaquin
0.053%
0.0439484%
city
Manteca
San Joaquin
0.054%
0.0443454%
C
Ripon
San Joaquin
0.013%
0.0104219%
Ci
Stockton
San Joaquin
0.313%
0.383%
0.3256176%
city
Tracy
San Joaquin
0.084%
0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo Coun
San Luis Obis o
0,816%
0.999%
0.8484126%
city
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obispo
0.024%
0,0199053%
city
Atascadero
San Luis Obispo
0 029%0
0 0240680%
Prtic�tlaGn
Subiiivi�iod
}Coun
Abatement
1lamtift
�Y,gt�tgd
-
Pa�cipahng $ubd�vision
tY
Sufi lY�s�on ;
�llcataori
city
I Paso de Robles Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo
0.043%
0.0353456%
city
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo
0,017%
0.0137881%
city
Morro Ba
San Luis Obispo
0,020%
0.0160922%
city
San Luis Obis o
San Luis Obispo
0,077%
0,0637841%
EMU
1OC
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1765-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
San Mateo County
San Mateo
1.074%
1.313%
1.1159599%
City
Belmont
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0169860%
City
Burlingame
San Mateo
0.019%
0.0152537%
city
Daly City
San Mateo
0.044%
0.0363880%
City
East Palo Alto
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0103982%
City
Foster City
San Mateo
0.020%
0.0166101%
City
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo
0.004%
0.0031638%
city
Hillsborough
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0110029%
City
Menlo Park
San Mateo
0.015%
0.0126209%
City
Millbrae
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0105836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo
0.016%
0.0130625%
city
Redwood City
San Mateo
0.056%
0.0463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0172161%
City
San Carlos
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0108885%
City
San Mateo
San Mateo
0.052%
0.0425841%
City
South San Francisco
San Mateo
0.043%
0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara Count?
Santa Barbara
1.132%
1.385%
1.1768968%
City
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara
0.001%
0.0008938%
city
Goleta
Santa Barbara
0.004%
0.0028969%
city
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
0.047%
0.0389379%
city
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
0.122%
0.1004559%
city
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara
0.058%
0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara
2.404%
2.941%
2.4987553%
City
Campbell
Santa Clara
0.014%
0.0112566%
city
Cupertino
Santa Clara
0.008%
0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara
0.025%
0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Los Altos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103338%
City
Los Gatos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103220%
city
Milpitas
Santa Clara
0.036%
0.0298120%
city
Morgan Hill
Santa Clara
0.015%
0.0124619%
city
Mountain View
Santa Clara
0.041%
0.0334608%
city
Palo Alto
Santa Clara
0.039%
0.0323080%
city
San Jose
Santa Clara
0.294%
0.360%
0.3054960%
city
Santa Clara
Santa Clara
0.067%
0.0549723%
�r
1 1 c p.�
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B6-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE50
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Saratoga
Santa Clara
0.004%
0.0034161%
Ci
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara
0.053%
0.0434069%
Count
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz
0,7837
0.957%
0.8135396%
city
Ca itola
Santa Cruz
0.020%
0.0168191%
Ci
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
0.143%
0.1180348%
city
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz
0.0150
5. 1126525%
city
Watsonville
Santa Cruz
0.063%
0.0520136%
County
Shasta CoUnLv
Shasta
1.095%
1,339%
1.1380191%
Ci
Anderson
Shasta
0.024%
0.0198896%
city
Reddina
Shasta
0,284%
0.2334841%
Ci
Shasta Lake
Shasta
0,004%
0.0031993%
Coun
Siski ou CounLv
Siski ou
0.228%
0.279%
0.2373393%
Comity
Solano County
Solano
0.760%
0.6260795%
Cit
Benicia
Solano
0.031%
0.0253903%
city
Dixon
Solano
0.016%
0.0130849%
city
Fairfield
Solano
0.109%
0.0897317%
city
Suisun City
Solano
0.021%°
0.0176183%
Ci
Vacaville
Solano
0.119%
0.0976497%
City
Vallejo
Solano
0.167%°
0.13736440/.
Coun
Sonoma County
Sonoma
1,218%
1.490%
1.2661290%
city
Healdsburg
Sonoma
0.032%°
0.0266929%
city
Petaluma
Sonoma
0.081%
0.0667507%°
Partxcipq ing
Si11 dtvislon :
Cl`assificatiori
Part�c�patmg 5ubdrv�sion
Counfy
Abatemept
Percentage
Plamhff
Subdmsmn '
Percentsge-
Weighted
Allchon
city
Rohnert Park
Sonoma
0.041%e
0.0340759%
city
Santa Rosa
Sonoma
0,184%
0.1519070%°
city
Sonoma
Sonoma
0.022%
0.0183438%
city
Windsor
Sonoma
0,016%
0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus Countv
Stanislaus
1.722%
1.4182273%
City
Ceres
Stanislaus
0.041%
0.0340260%
city
Modesto
Stanislaus
0.217%
0.1788759%
Ci
Newman
Stanislaus
0.006%
0.0046964%
city
Oakdale
Stanislaus
0.0180o
0.0145531%
Ci
Patterson
Stanislaus
0.01501
0.0126590%
City
Riverbank
Stanislaus
0.010%
0.0085699%
Ci
Turlock
Stanislaus
0.065%
0.0531966%
. 12c p
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sutter County
Sutter
0.306%
0.374%
0.3179548%
city
Yuba City
Sutter
0.074%
0.0606242%
County
Telranta County
Tehama
0.213%
0.261%
0.2216654%
city
Red Bluff
Tehama
0.014%
0.0117771 %
County
Trinity County
Trinity
0.082%
0.101%
0.08.55476%
County
Tulare Coun o
Tulare
0.809%
0.990%
0.8410949%
City
Dinuba
Tulare
0.014%
0.0116929%
city
Exeter
Tulare
0.004%
0.0032479%
city
Farmersville
Tulare
0.003%
0.0027879%
City
Lindsay
Tulare
0.007%
0.0057111%
city
Porterville
Tulare
0.0210o
0.0171845%
City
Tulare
Tulare
0.037%
0.0302273%
City
Visalia
Tulare
0.066%
0.0545872%
County
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne
0.486%
0.594%
0.5047621%
County
Ventura County
Ventura
2.192%
2.681%
2.2781201%
City
Camarillo
Ventura
0.002%
0.0012815%
city
Fillmore
Ventura
0.002%
0.0020294%
Ci
Moorpark
Ventura
0.008%
0.0067337%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Oxnard
Ventura
0.156%
0.190%
0.1617338%
city
Port Hueneme
Ventura
0.021%
0.0174145%
City
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura
0.085%
0.0702181%
city
Santa Paula
Ventura
0.014%
0.0119072%
city
Simi Valley
Ventura
0.065%
0.0533043%
Citv
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
0.022%
0.0179902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo
0.357%
0.437%
0.3713319%
City
Davis
Yolo
0.055%
0.0451747%
City
West Sacramento
Yolo
0.066%
0.0544321%
city
Woodland
Yolo
0.058%
0.0477904%
County
Yuba County
Yuba
0.214%
0.262%
0.2225679%
city
Marvsville
Yuba
0.014%
0.0112079%
13c p.,•
Docusign Envelope ID: D1 EF72EC-1 7l35-459A-93D1-E82Al3EFl30E5C
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate
Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political
subdivisions eligible to participate in the Alvogen Settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of the City of Santa Ana, the City of Santa Ana, its
counsel Robin Kaplans LLP, and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of
California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop
Agreement).
The City of Santa Ana and Robins Kaplan LLP intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a
State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on
Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, the City of Santa Ana may, subject to the limitations of the
Alvogen Settlement Agreement and CA Alvogen Allocation Agreement, as well as any other
limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Alvogen Settlement CA
Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to Robins Kaplan LLP. Any such payment from
the City of Santa Ana to Robins Kaplan LLP from the City of Santa Ana's CA Subdivision Fund
allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF
THE 15%] out of the City of Santa Ana's 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further
that such payments, together with any contingency -fees that Robins Kaplan LLP may receive
from the Attorney Fee Fund will not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross
recovery of the City of Santa Ana from the Alvogen Settlement Agreement.
Robins Kaplan LLP certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund
created under the Alvogen Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this
backstop agreement. Robins Kaplan LLP further certify that they are not seeking and will not
accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back -
Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Alvogen Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to
be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the
California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop
Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to
the City of Santa Ana, Robins Kaplan LLP, or any her parry.
tD , 2025
Alvaro Nunez, City Man er
, 2025
, 2025
By:
Robins Kaplan LLP
[ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
1 �� -
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Amneal Settlement
1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Amneal Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision
thereto (the "Amneal Settlement Agreement"), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of
California proposes this agreement (the "CA Amneal Allocation Agreement") to govern the
allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to
Sections IV and V of the Amneal Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this
agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections IX or XIV of the Amneal
Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Amneal Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA
Amneal Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a
Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or
greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating
Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding
Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Amneal Settlement Agreement.
b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in
California. CA Litigating Special Districts include Central California Alliance for
Health, Health Plan of San Joaquin, Santa Barbara San Luis Obispo Regional Health
Authority d/b/a Cencal Health, and Ventura County Medi-Cal Managed Care
Commission d/b/a Gold Coast Health Plan.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA
Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or
through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of
California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.
d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a
West -Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. ("Mylan"); Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co.,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS
Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc.,
Cencora, Inc. f/lda AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr,
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna
Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies
related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any
state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Amneal Settlement Agreement, as well as
applicable law, and the Amneal Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision
of this CA Amneal Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Amneal Allocation Agreement
have the same meaning as in the Amneal Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.
Pursuant to Section V(D)(1) of the Amneal Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund
payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the
Amneal Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund
payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.
This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California' pursuant to Sections IX or XIV
of the Amneal Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees, the
Additional Remediation Amount, and the Settlement Product Cash Conversion Amount.2
4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Amneal Settlement Agreement,
shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and
15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from
the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Amneal Allocation Agreement, and
15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California
Allocation"), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts
Fund"), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund").
A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by
the State for future Opioid Remediation.
' For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of
California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of
California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
'All Settlement Product Cash Conversion Amounts paid to California pursuant to Section XIV of
the Amneal Settlement Agreement shall be allocated to the State and used by the State for future
Opioid Remediation.
RM
2
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be
allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed
negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as
adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or
litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in
Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For
the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and
counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA
Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its
Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision,
and will receive payments as provided in the Amneal Settlement Agreement.
C) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating
Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its
share of fiends in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a
AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the
"Distributors Settlement"), that city's Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to
the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the
Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change
in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment
Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to
be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the
county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance
with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in
accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct
payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share,
with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund
Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA
Amneal Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San
Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become
Participating Subdivisions.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund
that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund,
become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered
within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Amneal Settlement Agreement
and this CA Amneal Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided
however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA
Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must
be transferred to the State..
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or
more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to
the Amneal Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA
Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will
be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities
within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program;
(2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD") treatment infrastructure;
(3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including
sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted
by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by
providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn)
and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability,
restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited
to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice -impacted youth, youth experiencing
adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or
(6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for
opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but
not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating
Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Amneal Settlement
Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private
sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement
Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for
Opioid Remediation consistent with the Amneal Settlement Agreement and this CA
Amneal Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may
agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among
themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating
Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being
reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds
must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may
regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Amneal Settlement Agreement
and this CA Amneal Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement
Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Amneal Settlement Agreement or this CA
Amneal Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from
any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA
Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the
concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the
Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to
meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and
confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise
enforce the requirements of the Amneal Settlement Agreement or this CA Amneal
Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be
brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on
which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this
agreement.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or
constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits,
investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal
enforcement actions.
C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the
Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used,
subject to any limits imposed by the Amneal Settlement Agreement and this CA Amneal
Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-
related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation
However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision
Funds be used for litigation -related fees and expenses.
D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee
agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its
contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement
agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its
share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee counsel
("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Amneal Settlement
Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any
payments to contingency -fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such
Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision's total gross recovery under
this Amneal Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments
made under a State Back -Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid
Abatement use requirements under Section VI.B.1 of the Amneal Settlement Agreement. Before
seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private counsel
representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney
Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Amneal Settlement Agreement. Further, private
counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of
Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California
Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the
request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and
its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: D1 EF72EC-17135-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into
agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or
enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any
duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without
limitation the Attorney General.
S. State and Subdivision Reporting
%/I
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the
settlement until those fiends are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports
will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement
will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those
funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a
certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the
settlement have been used in compliance with the Amneal Settlement Agreement and this
CA Amneal Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined
by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with
representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts
Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible
solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for
oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city
within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions'
expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will
be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision.
d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and
expenditures, as required by the Amneal Settlement Agreement and this CA Amneal
Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the
CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must
identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used,
including if used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to
Section V(B)(2) of the Amneal Settlement Agreement, such information must also be
reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Amneal.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to
discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the
State and Participating Subdivisions.
o} o
7 0
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA
Amneal Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet
and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated
motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Amneal Settlement Agreement, this CA Amneal Allocation
Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable
by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Amneal Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this
agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of
such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this
agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d) Except as provided in the Amneal Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be
governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
8
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
The undersigned, Santa Ana city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed
California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds —
Amneal Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Amneal
Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding
Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Amneal Settlement.
Signature:
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: City Manager
Date: I� (o Zr
Approved as to Form:
Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST: 9 AN )d
,I
Jennifer
City Cler
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights,
releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and
Use of Settlement Funds—Amneal Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not
change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.13.e., the State of California will receive the
Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA
Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not
an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100e/0) of the
California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.13. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant
to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -
hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta e
County
Alameda Counh,
Alameda
2.332%
2.853%
2.4237952%
cityAlameda
Alameda
0.069%
0.0570162%
Ci �
Albany
Alameda
0.013%
0.0107768%
city
Berkeley
Alameda
0.152%
0.1249656%
city
Dublin
Alameda
0.033%
0.040%
0.0338810%
City
Emeryville
Alameda
0.023%
0.0185765%
city
Fremont
Alameda
0.108%
0.0888576%
city
Hayward
Alameda
0.117%
0.0966218%
city
Livermore
Alameda
0.054%
0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda
0.026%
0.0217626%
City
Oakland
Alameda
0.486%
0.595%
0.5055601%
city
Piedmont
Alameda
0.014%
0.0114064%
city
Pleasanton
Alameda
0.067%
0.0554547%
city
San Leandro
Alameda
0.039%
0.0321267%
city
Union City
Alameda
0.043%
0.0352484%
County
Amador Countv
Amador
0.226%
0.277%
0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte
1.615%
1.975%
1.6783178%
City
Chico
Butte
0.216%
0.264%
0.2246499%
city
Oroville
Butte
0.079%
0.0646595%
County
Calaveras Coun o
Calaveras
0.226%
0.277%
0.2351644%
County
Colusa Countv
Colusa
0.059%
0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa
2.102%
2.571%
2.1844585%
city
Antioch
Contra Costa
0.037%
0.0301879%
city
Brentwood
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0215339%
city
Clayton
Contra Costa
0.002%
0.0018060%
City
Concord
Contra Costa
0.055%
0.0456676%
City
Danville
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0082255%
City
El Cerrito
Contra Costa
0.023%
0.0189024%
City
Hercules
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
e
PercentagPercenta
Plaintiff
Subdivision
a
Weighted
Allcation
Percen03ta e
cityLafayette
Contra Costa
0.006%
0.00460%
UI
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Martinez
Contra Costa
0.012%
0.0098593%
city
Mora a
Contra Costa
0.004%
0.0031007%
city
Oakley
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0079416%
city
Orinda
Contra Costa
0.005%
0.0038157%
city
Pinole
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0110909%
city
PittsburgContra
Costa
0.053%
0.0436369%
city
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0106309%
city
Richmond
Contra Costa
0.146%
0.1201444%
city
San Pablo
Contra Costa
0.018%
0.0148843%
city
San Ramon
Contra Costa
0.021%
0.0176459%
city
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte
0.114%
0.140%
0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado
0.768%
0.939%
0.7980034%
city
Placerville
El Dorado
0.015%
0.0127642%
City
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
0.081%
0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno
1.895%
2.318%
1.9693410%
city
Clovis
Fresno
0.065%
0.0536211%
city
Coalinga
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098554%
city
Fresno
Fresno
0.397%
0.3270605%
City
Kerman
Fresno
0.005%
0.0042534%
city
KingsbUrg
Fresno
0.008%
0.0066167%
city
Mendota
Fresno
0.002%
0.0019387%
City
Orange Cove
Fresno
0.004%
0.0035607%
city
Parlier
Fresno
0.008%
0.0069755%
City
Reedley
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098804%
city
Sanger
Fresno
0.018%
0.0146135%
city
Selma
Fresno
0.015%
0.0127.537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn
0.107%
0.131%
0.1116978%
County
Humboldt Coun o
Humboldt
1.030%
1.260%
1.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Arcata
Humboldt
0.054%
0.0447660%
City
Eureka
Humboldt
0.117%
0.143%
0.1216284%
city
Fortuna
Humboldt
0.032%
0.0266837%
County
Imperial County
Imperial
0.258%
0.315%
0.2679006%
city
Brawley
Im erial
0.011% 1
0.0087986%
WIN
2of
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Calexico
Imperial
0.019%
0.0152799%
city
El Centro
Im erial
0,158%
0.1302522%
city
Imperial
Imperial
0.006%
0.0048791%
County
In o County
In o
0.073%
0.089%
0.07.54413%
County
Kern CounLy
Kern
2.517%
3.079%
2.6159145%
city
Arvin
Kern
0.006%
0.0046425%
city
Bakersfield
Kern
0.212%
0.1747198%
city
California City
Kern
0.009%
0.0070820%
city
Delano
Kern
0.030%
0.0249316%
Ci
McFarland
Kern
0.003%
0.0025644%
city
Rid ccrest
Kern
0.015%
0.0120938%
city
Shafter
Kern
0.013%
0.0103417%
Cilz
Tehacha i
Kern
0.009%
0.0073580%
Ci
Wasco
Kern
0.0080/0
0.0069861%
Coun
Kings Coun2
Kin s
0.293%
0.2413469%
city
Avenal
Kings
0.007%
0.00.56335%
city
Corcoran
KinEs
0.013%
0.0107032%
Ci
Hanford
KinEs
0.027%
0.0226038%
Ci!z
Lemoore
Kinas
0.016%
0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake
0,795%
0.6545389%
city
Clearlake
Lake
0.041%
0.050%
0.0426253%
CL
Lakeport
Lake
0.021%
0.026%
0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen
0.319%
0.391%
0.3320610%
city
Susanville
Lassen
0.027%
0.0219295%
County
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles
13.896%
16.999%
14.4437559%
Pa ticil}at�ng,
Subdwisiod ?
Pbttacapat�dg SutdiVasion
Connty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Supdivision t
YVe�ghted
Allcat,on
City
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040024%
city
Alhambra
Los An eles
0.042%
0.0343309%
Ci
Arcadia
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0267718%
city
Artesia
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0005100%
Ci
Azusa
Los Angeles
0,026%
0.0210857%
Ci
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
0.027%
0.0218520%
city
Bell
Los Angeles
0.008%
0.0068783%
city
Bellflower
Los Angeles
0.002%
0,0014485%
city
Bell Gardens
Los Angeles
0.014%
0.0114301%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles
0.065%
0.0534897%
city
Burbank
Los Angeles
0.100%
0.0823132%
CilL
Calabasas
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048948%
Ci
Carson
Los Angeles
0.019%
0.0159805%
city
Cerritos
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039682%
city
Claremont
Los Angeles
0,010%
0.0082584%
Ci
Commerce
Los An eles
0,000%
0.0002971%
Ci
Compton
Los Angeles
0.044%
0.0361882%
city
Covina
Los Angeles
0,028%
0.0229127%
City
Cudah
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006020%
City
Culver City
Los Angeles
0.055%
0.0449894%
city
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006993%
city
DowneL
Los Angeles
0.052%
0.0429994%
Ci
Duarte
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0027261%
city
El Monte
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.038%
0.0318985%
Ci
El Segundo
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0268020%
city
Gardena
Los Angeles
0.034%
0,0278088%
city
Glendale
Los An eles
0.166%
0.1366586%
Ci
Glendora
Los An eles
0.016%
0.0134411%
city
Hawaiian Gardens
Los An eles
0.005%
0.0040549%
city
Hawthorne
Los Angeles
0.050%
0.0407833%
Parf4o�pahng '
SU, IVIsion
-Classilicahon'.'
$ `
Panc�ipafmg Subdrvisiou
County
:`
Abatement
4
:Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision '
_Pgrcenta e,,;
Weighted
Allcahon
..f'Percenta a-:
city
Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0145307%
city
Huntington Park
Los Angeles
0.023%
0.0190667%
CiLy
Inglewood
Los An eles
0.059%
0.0489195%
city
La Canada Flintrid e
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0025565%
Ci
Lakewood
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039971%
Ci
La Mirada
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0081572%
city
Lancaster
Los An eles
0,045%
0.0369689%
city
La Puente
Los Angeles
0,002%
0.0012999%
City
La Verne
Los Angeles
0,024%
0.0194190%
city
Lawndale
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0017731%
city
Lomita
Los Angeles 1
0.004%
0.0031940%
city
Long Beach
Los Angeles
0.4390/.
0.3614151%
Ci
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
2.715%
3.321%
2.8218811
®R;
4of
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX 1
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134345%
City
Malibu
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0019269%
city
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260686%
city
Maywood
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0035528%
city
Monrovia
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0254455%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles
0.030%
0.0250670%
City
Monterey Park
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0256677%
City
Norwalk
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0258228%
City
Palmdale
Los Angeles
0.046%
0.0375827%
city
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles
0.011%
0.0091483%
city
Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.146%
0.1200524%
City
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles
0.111%
0.0911933%
city
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012645%
CAN,
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
0.062%
0.0506992%
City
Rosemead
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
AbatementSubdivision
Percentage
Plaintiff
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
San Dimas
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0022016%
city
San Fernando
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0104837%
city
San Gabriel
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0147726%
City
San Marino
Los Angeles
0.009%
0.0073791%
city
Santa Clarita
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0178167%
City
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles
0.158%
0.1298513%
City
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048646%
City
Signal Hill
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0094884%
City
South El Monte
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039603%
City
South Gate
Los Angeles
0.020%
0.0166272%
City
South Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.012%
0.0095334%
city
Temple City
Los Angeles
0.00501.
0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles
0.112%
0.0919820%
City
Walnut
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0047305%
city
West Covina
Los Angeles
0.049%
0.0404521%
City
West Hollywood
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.01085170/.
O
Sof 0
Docusign Envelope ID: D1 EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX 1
city
Whittier
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260581%
County
Madera Coun: y
Madera
0.349%
0.427%
0.3630669%
city
Chowchilla
Madera
0.012%
0.0097332%
city
Madera
Madera
0.039%
0.0318441%
County
Marin County
Marin
0.564%
0.690%
0.5861325%
City
Larkspur
Marin
0.015%
0.0124697%
City
Mill Valley
Marin
0.020%
0.0168401%
city
Novato
Marin
0.028%
0.0229824%
City
San Anselmo
Marin
0.009%
0.0078062%
city
San Rafael
Marin
0.089%
r10.536%
0.0729823%
County
Mariposa County
Mariposa
0.084%
0.103%
0.0876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino
0.439%
0.4.558394%
city
Ukiah
Mendocino
0.039%
0.0317153%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
percent
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County
Merced County
Merced
0.551%
0.674%
0.5724262%
city
Atwater
Merced
0.024%
0.0195846%
city
Livingston
Merced
0.006%
0.0045873%
city
Los Banos
Merced
0.020%
0.0165142%
city
Merced
Merced
0.061%
0.0500762%
County
Modoc County
Modoc
0.065%
0.080%
0.0678250%
County
Mono County
Mono
0.023%
0.029%
0.0242606%
County
Monterey Conn
Monterey
0.908%
1.111%
0.9437083%
city
Greenfield
Monterey
0.006%
0.0050552%
city
Kin City
Monterey
0.005%
0.0037355%
city
Marina
Monterey
0.017%
0.0144098%
city
Monterey
Monterey
0.041%
0.0336540%
city
Pacific Grove
Monterey
0.009%
0.0074842%
City
Salinas
Monterey
0.094%
0.0776576%
city
Seaside
Monterey
0.023%
0.0191772%
City
Soledad
Montere
0.007%
0.0060870%
County
Napa County
Napa
0.288%
0.352%
0.2994325%
city
American Canyon
Napa
0.017%
0.0136869%
city
Napa
Napa
0.078%
0.0642783%
County
Nevada County
Nevada
0.441%
0.539%
0.4579827%
city
Grass Valley
Nevada
0.024%
0.0197805%
o -o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Truckee
Nevada
0,003%
0.0023843%
County
Orange County
Orange
4.364%
5,339%
4.5363576%
Ci
Aliso Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0113841%
city
Anaheim
Orange
0.554%
0.678%
0.5759282%
city
Brea
Orange
0,086%
0.0708897%
city
Buena Park
Orange
0.087%
0.0714352%
city
Costa Mesa
Orange
0.124%
0.152%
0.1288366%
City
Cypress
Oran e
0.033%
0.0271937%
city
Dana Point
Orange
0.001%
0.0005560%
Parho�pat�ngi
Subdry�s�4u '
Classification'
Pay t�gipatmg Subd►vzsFon
County
Aba fii&i
Percentage
P1a�ntdY -
Sabdms�on '
Percents e :
Weighted ,
Allcahon
_ ,Percents e - -
CiLy
Fountain Valley
Orange
0.055%
0.0455980%
City
Fullerton
Orange
0.137%
0.168%
0.1425744%
city
Garden Grove
Orange
0,213%
0.1752482%
city
Huntin ton Beach
Orange
0.247%°
0.302%°
0,2568420%
city
hvine
Oran e
0.139%
0.170%
0.1442350%
city
Laguna Beach
Orange
0,047%
0.058%
0.0493043%
Ci
La una Hills
Orange
0.014%
0.0115457%
city
Laguna Niguel
Orange
0,001%
0.0007071%
city
Laguna Woods
Orange
0.001%
0.0006546%
city
La Habra
Orange
0,060%
0.073%
0.0621049%
Ci
Lake Forest
Orange
0.012%
0.0101249%
Ci
La Palma
Orange
0.012%
0.0095439%
Ci
Los Alamitos
Orange
0.008%
0.0069190%
Ci
Mission Vie o
Orange
0,014%
0.0117.560%
city
New ort Beach
Orange
0.179%°
0.1470134%
City
Orande
Oran e
0.150%
0.1231320%
city
Placentia
Orange
0.029%
0.035%
0.0298912%
city
Rancho Santa Margarita
Oran e
0,001%
0.0006296%
city
San Clemente
Orange
0.008%
0.010%
0.0086083%
Ci
San Juan Capistrano
Orange
0.008%
0.0065510%
city
Santa Ana
Orange
0.502%
0.614%
0.5213866%
city
Seal Beach
Orange
0.020%
0.0165891%
city
Stanton
Orange
0.035%
0.0291955%
city
Tustin
Oran e
0.073%
0.0600341%
city
Westminster
Orange 1
0.104%
0.127%
0.10827210/6
o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1765-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Yorba Linda
Orange
0.044%
0.0362223%
County
Placer County
Placer
1.045%
1.278%
1.0861002%
city
Auburn
Placer
0.017%
0.0141114%
city
Lincoln
Placer
0.031%
0.0255599%
City
Rocklin
Placer
0.076%
0.0625485%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Roseville
Placer
0.196%
0.1616559%
County
Plumas Coun
Plumas
0.205%
0.251%
0.2128729%
County
Riverside Counts'
Riverside
4.534%
5.547%
4.7128296%
city
Banning
Riverside
0.017%
0.0143848%
City
Beaumont
Riverside
0.021%
0.0171135%
City
Blythe
Riverside
0.012%
0.0096714%
city
Canyon Lake
Riverside
0.000%
0.0001761%
city
Cathedral City
Riverside
0.067%
0.0553614%
City
Coachella
Riverside
0.021%
0.0173054%
city
Corona
Riverside
0.147%
0.1207083%
Ci ,
Desert Hot Springs
Riverside
0.024%
0.0200433%
City
Eastvale
Riverside
0.000%
0.0002747%
City
Hemet
Riverside
0.051%
0.0421792%
City
Indio
Riverside
0.056%
0.0457794%
City
Juru a Valley
Riverside
0.001%
0.0008991%
city
Lake Elsinore
Riverside
0.021%
0.0172949%
City
La Quinta
Riverside
0.063%
0.0516732%
City
Menifee
Riverside
0.032%
0.0260909%
City
Moreno Valley
Riverside
0.137%
0.1130348%
city
Murrieta
Riverside
0.048%
0.059%
0.0497423%
city
Norco
Riverside
0.016%
0.0134542%
city
Pahn Desert
Riverside
0.083%
0.0682465%
city
Palm Springs
Riverside
0.076%
0.0629862%
City
Perris
Riverside
0.009%
0.0076774%
City
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
0.052%
0.0431098%
City
Riverside
Riverside
0.268%
0.2206279%
City
San Jacinto
Riverside
0.010%
0.0085936%
City
Temecula
Riverside
0.022%
0.0180086%
City
Wildomar
Riverside
0.008%
0.0062500%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1765-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sacramento County
Sacramento
3.797%
4.645%
3.9465887%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Citrus Heights
Sacramento
0.057%
0.0465312%
city
Elk Grove
Sacramento
0.130%
0.1066994%
City
Folsom
Sacramento
0.108%
0.0890850%
City
Galt
Sacramento
0.017%
0.0143704%
City
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento
0.008%
0.0067679%
city
Sacramento
Sacramento
0.721%
0.882%
0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito
0.106%
0.130%
0.1101417%
City
Hollister
San Benito
0.027%
0.0225355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino
3.259%
3.987%
3.3878124%
city
Adelanto
San Bernardino
0.008%
0.0066640%
City
Apple Valley
San Bernardino
0.025%
0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino
0.015%
0.0122056%
City
Chino
San Bernardino
0.064%
0.0525893%
City
Chino Hills
San Bernardino
0.001%
0.00106388%
city
Colton
San Bernardino
0.031%
0.0253443%
city
Fontana
San Bernardino
0.112%
0.0920543%
City
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino
0.006%
0.0051051%
City
Hesperia
San Bernardino
0.035%
0.0291522%
city
Highland
San Bernardino
0.004%
0.0029061%
city
Loma Linda
San Bernardino
0.009%
0.0071188%
City
Montclair
San Bernardino
0.039%
0.0322108%
city
Ontario
San Bernardino
0.179%
0.1472934%
city
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino
0.084%
0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San Bernardino
0.057%
0.0469150%
city
Rialto
San Bernardino
0.073%
0.0603206%
city
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
0.178%
0.1461880%
City
Twentynine Palms
San Bernardino
0.002%
0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino
0.052%
0.0424460%
City
Victorville
San Bernardino
0.033%
0.0269400%
City
Yucaipa
San Bernardino
0.016%
0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Alication
Percentage
0
9of �_
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
city
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino
0.003%
0.0021228%
County
San Diego County
San Diego
5.706%
6.980%
5.9309748%
city
Carlsbad
San Diego
0.128%
0.1050485%
city
Chula Vista
San Diego
0.189%
0.231%
0.1961456%
city
Coronado
San Diego
0.044%
0.0359095%
city
El Cajon
San Diego
0.113%
0.0933582%
City
Encinitas
San Diego
0.061%
0.074%
0.0630289%
city
Escondido
San Diego
0.145%
0.1192204%
City
Imperial Beach
San Diego
0.014%
0.5118283%
City
La Mesa
San Diego
0.055%
0.068%
0.0575593%
city
Lemon Grove
San Diego
0.022%
0.0183911%
City
National City
San Diego
0.0800/.
0.0656808%
city
Oceanside
San Diego
0.213%
0.1753428%
city
Poway
San Diego
0.062%
0.0511040%
city
San Diego
San Diego
1.975%
2.416%
2.0531169%
City
San Marcos
San Diego
0.089%
0.0733897%
City
Santee
San Diego
0.033%
0.0268401%
City
Solana Beach
San Diego
0.017%
0.0138564%
city
Vista
San Diego
0.052%
0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco
3.026%
3.702%
3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin Coun6t
San Joaquin
1.680%
2.055%
1.7460399%
City
Lathrop
San Joaquin
0.009%
0.0075394%
city
Lodi
San Joaquin
0.053%
0.0439484%
city
Manteca
San Joaquin
0.054%
0.0443454%
city
Ripon
San Joaquin
0.013%
0.0104219%
city
Stockton
San Joaquin
0.313%
0.383%
0.3256176%
City
Tracy
San Joaquin
0.084%
0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo Coun ,
San Luis Obispo
0.816%
0.999%
0.8484126%
city
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obispo
0.024%
0.0199053%
City
Atascadero
San Luis Obis o
0.029%
0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentalle
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo
0.043%
0.0353456%
City
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo
0.017%
0.0137881%
city
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo
0.020%
0.0160922%
City
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
0.077%
0.0637841%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX l
Count),
San Mateo County
San Mateo
1.074%
1.313%
1.1159599%
City
Belmont
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0169860%
City
Burlingame
San Mateo
0.019%
0.0152537%
city
Daly City
San Mateo
0.044%
0.0363880%
City
East Palo Alto
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0103982%
City
Foster City
San Mateo
0.020%
0.0166101%
City
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo
0.004%
0.0031638%
City
Hillsborough
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0110029%
City
Menlo Park
San Mateo
0.015%
0.0126209%
City
Millbrae
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0105836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo
0.016%
0.0130625%
city
Redwood City
San Mateo
0.056%
0.0463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0172161%
City
San Carlos
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0108885%
city
San Mateo
San Mateo
0.052%
0.0425841%
City
South San Francisco
San Mateo
0.043%
0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara Counh,
Santa Barbara
1.132%
1.385%
1.1768968%
city
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara
0.001%
0.0008938%
City
Goleta
Santa Barbara
0.004%
0.0028969%
city
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
0.047%
0.0389379%
city
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
0.122%
0.1004559%
city
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara
0.058%
0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara
2.404%
2.941%
2.4987553%
City
Cam bell
Santa Clara
0.014%
0.0112566%
city
Cupertino
Santa Clara
0.008%
0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara
0.025%
0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
mmmmwlWeighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Los Altos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103338%
city
Los Gatos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103220%
city
Milpitas
Santa Clara
0.036%
0.0298120%
city
Moran Hill
Santa Clara
0.015%
0.0124619%
City
Mountain View
Santa Clara
0.041%
0.0334608%
city
Palo Alto
Santa Clara
0.039%
0.0323080%
city
San Jose
Santa Clara
0.294%
0.360%
0.3054960%
City
Santa Clara
Santa Clara
0.067%
0.05497230/.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-469A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Sarato a
Santa Clara
0.004%
0.0034161%
Ci
Sunn vale
Santa Clara
0.053%
0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz CounLy
Santa Cruz
0.783%
0.957%
0.8135396%
city
Ca itola
Santa Cruz
0.020%
0.0168191%
Ci
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
0.143%
0.1180348%
city
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz
0,015%
0.0126525%
Ci
Watsonville
Santa Cruz
0.063%
0.0520136%
CountL
Shasta Coun2
Shasta
1.095%
1.339%
1.1380191%
city
Anderson
Shasta
0.024%
0.0198896%
city
ReddinE
Shasta
0,284%
0.2334841%
city
Shasta Lake
Shasta
0,004%
0.0031993%
County
Siski ou Count
Siski ou
0.228%
0.279%
0,2373393%
County
Solano County
Solano
0.760%
0.6260795%
city
Benicia
Solano
0,031%
0.0253903%
city
Dixon
Solana,
0.016%
0.0130849%
Ci
Fairfield
Solano
0,109%
0.0897317%
city
Suisun City
Solano
0.021%
0.0176183%
City
Vacaville
Solano
0.119%
0.0976497%
city
Vallejo
Solano
0.167%
0.1373644%
Count
Sonoma County
Sonoma
1.218%
1.490%
1.2661290%
city
Healdsburg
Sonoma
0.032%
0.0266929%
city
Petaluma
Sonoma
0.081%
0.0667507%
Parhe�pahng,
Subdms�on
Ch3sification': ,_
Partic atm Subd►v�sion
p g
t-
�� ,.. ��.F ..: ,. . ,
Coun ty
: �_ .e .,; _ -, .,
Abatement
Percents a_
a � �- ,�g
P- Wh .
=
,Subdrv�sion _
, Percents e,=
Wei hted
g
Adcahon
Percehta a .,.
city
Rohnert Park
Sonoma
0.041%
0.0340759%
city
Santa Rosa
Sonoma
0.184%
0.1519070%
Ci
Sonoma
Sonoma
0.022%
0.0183438%
city
Windsor
Sonoma
0.016%
0,0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus
1.722%
1.4182273%
City
Ceres
Stanislaus
0.041%
0.0340260%
Ci
Modesto
Stanislaus
0.217%
0.1788759%
city
Newman
Stanislaus
0.006%
0,0046964%°
city
Oakdale
Stanislaus
0.018%
0.0145531%
city
Patterson
Stanislaus
0.015%
0.0126590%
Cit
Riverbank
Stanislaus
0.010%
0.0085699%
Ci
Turlock
Stanislaus
0.065%
0,0531966%
ffill
12c p
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Coun
Sutter County
Sutter
0.306%
0.374%
0.3179548%
city
Yuba City
Sutter
0.074%
0.0606242%
County
Tehama County
Tehama
0.213%
0.261%
0.2216654%
city
Red Bluff
Tehama
0.014%
0.0117771%
County
Trinit CounLr
Trinity
0.082%
0,101%
0.0855476%
County
Tulare Count
Tulare
0.809%
0,990%
0.8410949%°
city
Dinuba
Tulare
0.014%
0.0116929%
city
Exeter
Tulare
0.004%
0,0032479%
city
Farmersville
Tulare
0.003%
0.0027879%
city
Lindsay
Tulare
0.007%
0.0057111%
Ci
Porterville
Tulare
0,021%
0.017184.5%
city
Tulare
Tulare
0.037%
0.0302273%
city
Visalia
Tulare
0.066%
0.0545872%
County
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne
0.486%
0.594%
0.5047621%
County
Ventura County
Ventura
2.192%
2.681%
2.2781201%
city
Camarillo
Ventura
0.002%
0.001281.5%
city
Fillmore
Ventura
0.002%
0.0020294%
city
Moorpark
Ventura
0,008%
0.0067337%
Panccl tmg "
Subd"ion
Cla'ssiticatton,. ,
Panc��patmg Subdrv�sion
�.> „ ., .,
County
�. _ . ..�
Abatement
Percentage
Tlamtdf
Subdmsion
peicenYa e�
Wei bted
g
ABeahon
,Percents a-
city
Oxnard
Ventura
0.156%
0.190%
0.1617338%
city
Port Hueneme
Ventura
0.021%
0.0174145%
city
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura
0.085%
0.0702181%
city
Santa Paula
Ventura
0,014%°
0.0119072%
city
Simi Vallex
Ventura
0.065%°
0.0533043%
city
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
0.022%
0.0179902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo
0.357%
0.437%
0.3713319%
city
Davis
Yolo
0.055%
0.0451747%
City
West Sacramento
Yolo
0.066%
0.0544321%
Ci
Woodland
Yolo
0.058%
0,0477904%
County
Yuba County
Yuba
1 0.214%
0,262%
0.2225679%
city
M sville
Yuba
1 0.014%
010112079%
13c [ ,
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFB0E5C
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate
Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political
subdivisions eligible to participate in the Amneal Settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of the City of Santa Ana, the City of Santa Ana, its
counsel Robins Kaplan LLP, and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of
California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop
Agreement).
The City of Santa Ana and Robins Kaplan LLP intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a
State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on
Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Amneal Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, the City of Santa Ana may, subject to the limitations of the
Amneal Settlement Agreement and CA Amneal Allocation Agreement, as well as any other
limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Amneal Settlement CA
Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to Robins Kaplan LLP. Any such payment from
the City of Santa Ana to Robins Kaplan LLP from the City of Santa Ana's CA Subdivision Fund
allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF
THE 15%] out of the City of Santa Ana's 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further
that such payments, together with any contingency -fees that Robins Kaplan LLP may receive
from the Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross
recovery of the City of Santa Ana from the Amneal Settlement Agreement.
Robins Kaplan LLP certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund
created under the Amneal Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this
backstop agreement. Robins Kaplan LLP further certify that they are not seeking and will not
accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back -
Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Amneal Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to
be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the
California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop
Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not re re the paymen f y state funds to
the City of Santa Ana, Robins Kaplan LLP, or y er pa
b -0?.r, 2Q35-
lvaro Nunez, City Mana r
, 2025
, 2025
ATTEST. 4 9AflT,
U >
7
I '
Jenni . Ha
ir. Cler
By:
Robins Kaplan LLP
[ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
1 0,
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Apotex Settlement
1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Apotex Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision
thereto (the "Apotex Settlement Agreement"), including Section VI and Exhibit O, the State of
California proposes this agreement (the "CA Apotex Allocation Agreement") to govern the
allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to
Sections V and VI of the Apotex Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this
agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Section X of the Apotex Settlement
Agreement.
Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Apotex Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA
Apotex Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a
Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or
greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating
Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding
Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Apotex Settlement Agreement.
b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in
California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA
Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or
through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of
California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.
d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a
West -Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. ("Mylan"); Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co.,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS
Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc.,
Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna
Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer
D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies
related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any
state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Apotex Settlement Agreement, as well as
applicable law, and the Apotex Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of
this CA Apotex Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Apotex Allocation Agreement
have the same meaning as in the Apotex Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.
Pursuant to Section VI(D)(1) of the Apotex Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund
payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VI(B)(2) of the
Apotex Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund
payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.
This Agreement does not apply to funds received by Californial pursuant to Section X of the
Apotex Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees and the Additional
Remediation Amount.
4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Apotex Settlement Agreement,
shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and
15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from
the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Apotex Allocation Agreement, and
15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California
Allocation"), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts
Fund"), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund").
A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by
the State for future Opioid Remediation.
B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be
allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed
negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as
adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or
litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA
' For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of
California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of
California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
2 p
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in
Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For
the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and
counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its
Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision,
and will receive payments as provided in the Apotex Settlement Agreement.
C) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating
Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its
share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a
AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the
"Distributors Settlement"), that city's Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to
the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the
Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change
in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment
Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to
be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the
county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance
with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in
accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct
payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share,
with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund
Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Apotex
Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and
Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating
Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund
that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund,
become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered
within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Apotex Settlement Agreement and
this CA Apotex Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided
however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA
Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must
be transferred to the State.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or
more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to
the Apotex Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA
Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will
be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching finds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities
within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program;
(2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD") treatment infrastructure;
(3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including
sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted
by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by
providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn)
and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability,
restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited
to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice -impacted youth, youth experiencing
adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or
(6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for
opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but
not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS
will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating
Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Apotex Settlement
Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private
sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement
Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for
Opioid Remediation consistent with the Apotex Settlement Agreement and this CA
Apotex Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may
agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among
themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being
reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement fiends
must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those fiends. DHCS may
regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Apotex Settlement Agreement
and this CA Apotex Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement
Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Apotex Settlement Agreement or this CA Apotex
Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other
sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating
Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the
Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to
meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and
confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise
enforce the requirements of the Apotex Settlement Agreement or this CA Apotex
Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be
brought, as to a specific expenditure of fiends, more than five years after the date on
which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this
agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or
constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits,
investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal
enforcement actions.
C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Subdivision Fund. All fiends in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the
Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used,
subject to any limits imposed by the Apotex Settlement Agreement and this CA Apotex
Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-
related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision
Funds be used for litigation -related fees and expenses.
D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee
agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its
contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement
agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its
share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee
counsel ("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Apotex
Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with
any payments to contingency -fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such
Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision's total gross recovery under
this Apotex Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments
made under a State Back -Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid
Abatement use requirements under Section VI.B.1 of the Apotex Settlement Agreement. Before
seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private counsel
representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney
Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Apotex Settlement Agreement. Further, private
counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of
Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California
Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the
request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and
its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney
General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into
agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or
enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any
duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without
limitation the Attorney General.
Docusign Envelope ID; D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the
settlement until those fiends are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports
will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement
will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those
funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a
certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the
settlement have been used in compliance with the Apotex Settlement Agreement and this
CA Apotex Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by
DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives
of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts
Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible
solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for
oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city
within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions'
expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will
be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision.
d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and
expenditures, as required by the Apotex Settlement Agreement and this CA Apotex
Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the
CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must
identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used,
including if used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to
Section VI(B)(2) of the Apotex Settlement Agreement, such information must also be
reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Apotex.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to
discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the
State and Participating Subdivisions.
6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA
Apotex Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet
and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated
motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Apotex Settlement Agreement, this CA Apotex Allocation
Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
7
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable
by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Apotex Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this
agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of
such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this
agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d) Except as provided in the Apotex Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be
governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
The undersigned, Santa Ana city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California
State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Apotex
Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Apotex Settlement and
ACCEPTS this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds —Apotex Settlement.
Signature:
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: City Manager
Date: 6 !ice' Z--
Approved as to Form:
�aiz�L �
Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
AH T�
O�
�ry
Cil IP ��
Jennifer L. all
City Cle
0 0
9 p
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights,
releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and
Use of Settlement Funds—Apotex Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not
change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the
Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA
Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not
an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the
California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.13. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant
to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of"100%" refers to one -
hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage.
P❑ 11`.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
16O.nn00/. 10(1 0000/ 1 Oft MOO/ -
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County
Alameda County
Alameda
2.332%
2.853%
2.4237952%
cityAlameda
Alameda
0.069%
0.0570162%
cityAlban
Alameda
0.013%
0.0107768%
City
Berkeley
Alameda
0.152%
0.1249656%
city
Dublin
Alameda
0.033%
0.040%
0.0338810%
city
Emeryville
Alameda
0.023%
0.0185765%
city
Fremont
Alameda
0.108%
0.0888576%
city
Hayward
Alameda
0.117%
0.0966218%
City
Livermore
Alameda
0.054%
0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda
0.026%
0.0217626%
city
Oakland
Alameda
0.486%
0.595%
0.5055601%
City
Piedmont
Alameda
0.014%
0.0114064%
City
Pleasanton
Alameda
0.067%
0.0554547%
City
San Leandro
Alameda
0.039%
0.0321267%
city
Union City
Alameda
0.043%
0.0352484%
County
Anmdor County
Amador
0.226%
0.277%
0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte
1.615%
1.975%
1.6783178%
city
Chico
Butte
0.216%
0.264%
0.2246499%
city
Oroville
Butte
0.079%
0.0646595%
County
Calaveras County
Calaveras
0.226%
0.277%
0.2351644%
County
Colusa County
Colusa
0.059%
0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa
2.102%
2.571%
2.1844585%
City
Antioch
Contra Costa
0.0377
0.0301879%
City
Brentwood
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0215339%
City
Clayton
Contra Costa
0.002%
0.0018060%
City
Concord
Contra Costa
0.055%
0.0456676%
city
Danville
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0082255%
city
El Cerrito
Contra Costa
0.023%
0.0189024%
City
Hercules
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Lafayette
Contra Costa 1
0.006%
0.0046030%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Martinez
Contra Costa
0.012%
0.0098593%
city
Mora a
Contra Costa
0.004%
0.0031007%
city
Oakley
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0079416%
city
Orinda
Contra Costa
0.005%
0.0038157%
city
Pinole
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0110909%
City
PittsburgContra
Costa
0.053%
0.0436369%
City
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0106309%
city
Richmond
Contra Costa
0.146%
0.1201444%
city
San Pablo
Contra Costa
0.018%
0.0148843%
city
San Ramon
Contra Costa
0.021%
0.0176459%
city
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte
0.114%
0.140%
0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado
0.768%
0.939%
0.7980034%
city
Placerville
El Dorado
0.015%
0.0127642%
city
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
0.081%
0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno
1.895%
2.318%
1.9693410%
city
Clovis
Fresno
0.065%
0.0536211%
city
Coalinga
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098554%
city
Fresno
Fresno
0.397%
0.3270605%
City
Kerman
Fresno
0.005%
0.0042534%
city
Kingsburg
Fresno
0.008%
0.0066167%
City
Mendota
Fresno
0.002%
0.0019387%
city
Orange Cove
Fresno
0.004%
0.0035607%
city
Parlier
Fresno
0.008%
0.0069755%
city
Reedley
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098804%
city
Sanger
Fresno
0.018%
0.0146135%
city
Selma
Fresno
0.015%
0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn
0.107%
0.131%
0.1116978%
County
Humboldt County
Humboldt
1.030%
1.260%
1.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Arcata
Humboldt
0.054%
0.0447660%
City
Eureka
Humboldt
0.117%
0.143%
0.1216284%
city
Fortuna
Humboldt
0.032%
0.0266837%
County
Imperial County
Imperial
0.258%
0.315%
0.2679006%
city
Brawley
Imperial
0.011%
0.0087986%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Calexico
Imperial
0.019%
0.0152799%
City
El Centro
Imperial
0.158%
0.1302522%
City
Imperial
Imperial
0.006%
0.0048791%
Count
Ingo County
In o
0.073%
0.089%
0.0754413%
County
Kern County
Kern
2.517%
3.079%
2.6159145%
city
Arvin
Kern
0.006%
0.0046425%
city
Bakersfield
Kern
0.212%
0.1747198%
city
California City
Kern
0.009%
0.0070820%
city
Delano
Kern
0.030%
0.0249316%
city
McFarland
Kern
0.003%
0.0025644%
city
Rid ecrest
Kern
0.015%
0.0120938%
city
Shatter
Kern
0.013%
0.0103417%
city
Tehachapi
Kern
0.009%
0.0073580%
city
Wasco
Kern
0.008%
0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings
0.293%
0.2413469%
city
Avenal
Kings
0.007%
0.0056335%
city
Corcoran
Kings
0.013%
0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings
0.027%
0.0226038%
City
Lemoore
Kings
0.016%
0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake
0.795%
0.6545389%
city
Clearlake
Lake
0.041%
0.050%
0.0426253%
city
Lakeport
Lake
0.021%
0.026%
0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen
0.319%
0.391%
0.3320610%
city
Susanville
Lassen
0.027%
0.0219295%
County
Los Angeles County
Los An eles
13.896%
16.999%
14.4437559%
Participating
Subdivision
Class cation
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040024%
City
Alhambra
Los Angeles
0.042%
0.0343309%
city
Arcadia
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0267718%
city
Artesia
Los Angeles
0.001% 1
0.0005100%
city
Azusa
Los Angeles
0.026%
0.0210857%
city
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
0.027%
0.0218520%
Bell
Los An eles
0.008%
.088Ci
00673%
CityBellflower
Los Angeles
0.02%
0.0014485%
CityBell
Gardens
Los Angeles
0.04%
0.0114301%
3of 0
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1765-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
City
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles
0.065%
0.0534897%
City
Burbank
Los Angeles
0.100%
0.0823132%
City
Calabasas
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048948%
City
Carson
Los An eles
0.019%
0.0159805%
City
Cerritos
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039682%
City
Claremont
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0082584%
city
Commerce
Los Angeles
0.000%
0.0002971%
City
Compton
Los Angeles
0.044%
0.0361882%
City
Covina
Los Angeles
0.028%
0.0229127%
City
Cudahy
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006020%
city
Culver City
Los Angeles
0.055%
0.0449894%
Citv
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006993%
city
Downey
Los Angeles
0.052%
0.0429994%
city
Duarte
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0027261%
City
El Monte
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.038%
0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0268020%
city
Gardena
Los Angeles
0.034%
0.0278088%
City
Glendale
Los Angeles
0.166%
0.1366586%
city
Glendora
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134411%
city
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040549%
City
Hawthorne
Los Angeles
0.050%
0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Percentage
Plaintiff Pla
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0145307%
City
Huntington Park
Los Angeles
0.023%
0.0190667%
City
Inglewood
Los Angeles
0.059%
0.0489195%
city
La Canada Flintrid e
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0025565%
City
Lakewood
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039971%
City
La Mirada
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0081572%
City
Lancaster
Los Angeles
0.045%
0.0369689%
City
La Puente
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012999%
city
La Verne
Los Angeles
0.024%
0.0194190%
city
Lawndale
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0017731%
city
Lomita
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0031940%
city
Long Beach
Los Angeles
0.439%
0.3614151%
City
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
2.715% 1
3.321%
2.8218811 %
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX l
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134345%
City
Malibu
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0019269%
City
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260686%
City
Maywood
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0035528%
City
Monrovia
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0254455%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles
0.030%
0.0250670%
City
Monterey Park
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0256677%
city
Norwalk
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0258228%
city
Palmdale
Los Angeles
0.046%
0.0375827%
City
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles
0.011%
0.0091483%
City
Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.146%
0.1200524%
city
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles
0.111%
0.0911933%
city
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012645%
city
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
0.062%
0.0506992%
City
Rosemead
Los An eles
0.003%
0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
San Dimas
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0022016%
City
San Fernando
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0104837%
city
San Gabriel
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0147726%
City
San Marino
Los Angeles
0.009%
0.0073791%
city
Santa Clarita
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0178167%
City
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles
0.158%
0.1298513%
city
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048646%
City
Signal Hill
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0084884%
city
South El Monte
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039603%
City
South Gate
Los Angeles
0.020%
0.0166272%
city
South Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.012%
0.0095334%
City
Temple City
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles
0.112%
0.0919820%
City
Walnut
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0047305%
City
West Covina
Los Angeles
0.049%
0.0404521%
City
West Hollywood
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0108517%
O�'O�
5of ��
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Whittier
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260581%
County
Madera CounLv
Madera
0.349%
0.427%
0.3630669%
city
Chowchilla
Madera
0.012%
0.0097332%
city
Madera
Madera
0,039%
0.0318441%
Corm
Marin County
Maria
0.564%
0.690%
0.5861325%
city
Larkspur
Marin
0.015%
0,0124697%
Ci
Mill Valley
Marin
0.020%
0.0168401%
city
Novato
Marin
0.028%
0.0229824%
city
San Anselmo
Marin
0.009%
0.0078062%
city
San Rafael
Marin
0.089%
0,0729823%
County
Mart osa County
Mariposa
0.084%
1 0.103%
0.0876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino
0.439%
0.536%
0.4558394%
city
Ukiah
Mendocino
0.039%
0.0317153%
Panc��pahng '
Sulfdtv�cWn :
Glas-ihci4Afin
PancC�patmg Subdrvu�on
County
Abatement-15
Percentage
tamtdf
Subdiy�swn
peicenta e;=•
Weighted
Allcahon
.:Pe�centa a-'
County
Merced Coun4v
Merced
0.551%
0.674%
0.5724262%
City
Atwater
Merced
0,024%
0,0195846%
C
Livia ston
Merced
0.006%
0,0045873%
city
Los Banos
Merced
0.020%
0.016.5142%
city
Merced
Merced
0.061%
0.0500762%
CountX
Modoc Count
Modoc
0.065%
0,080%
0.0678250%
County
Mono CounLy
Mono
0.023%
0,029%
0.0242606%
County
Montere County
Monterey
0.908%
1.111%
0.9437083%
Ci
Greenfield
Monterey
0.006%
0.0050552%
city
Kina City
Monterey
0.005%
0.0037355%
city
Marina
Monterey
0.017%
0.0144098%
city
Monterey
Monterei
0.041%
0.0336540%
Ci
Pacific Grove
Monterey
0.009%
0,0074842%
city
Salinas
Monterey
0.094%
0.0776.576%
city
Seaside
Monterey
0.023%
0.0191772%
Ci
1--county
Soledad
Monterey
0.007%
0.0060870%
Napa County
Na a
0.2880/.
0.352%
0.2994325%
city
American Canyon
Napa
0.017%
0.0136869%
Ci
Napa
Napa
0.078%
0.0642783%
County
Nevada Count
Nevada
0.441%
0.539%
0.4579827%
cityGrass
Valle
Nevada
0.024%
0.01978050/.
ME
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Truckee
Nevada
0.003%
0.0023843%
County
Orange County
Orange
4.364%
5.339%
4,5363576%
city
Aliso Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.5113841%
city
Anaheim
Orange
0.554%
0.678%
0.5759282%
city
Brea
Orange
0.086%
0.0708897%
city
Buena Park
Orange
0.087%
0.0714352%
city
Costa Mesa
Orange
0.124%
0.152%
0.1288366%
city
Cypress
Orange
0.033%
0.0271937%
city
Dana Point
Orange
0,001%
0.0005560%
Panc��pahng;
Subdms�on '
classification'
Panccipi tmg Subdiviswn
Coun tS
Abatement
Percentage
Plamt ff
5ftbd"10n
P.ercenta e:;,
Weighted
Allcahon
Per.¢enta
Ci
Fountain Valley
Orange
0,055%
0.0455980%
city
Fullerton
Orange
0.137%
0,168%
0.1425744%
Ci
Garden Grove
Orange
0.213%
0.1752482%
city
Huntington Beach
Orange
0,247%
0.302%
0.2568420%
city
Irvine
Orange
0,139%
0.170%
0.1442350%
city
Laguna Beach
Orange
0.047%
0.058%
0.0493043%
city
Laguna Hills
Orange
0.014%
0.0115457%
Ci
Laguna Niguel
Orange
0.001%
0.0007071%
city
Laguna Woods
Orange
0,001%
0.0006546%
cityLa
Habra
Oran e
0.060%
0,073%
0.0621049%
city
Lake Forest
Oran e
0.012%
0.0101249%
city
La Palma
Orange
0.012%
0.0095439%
Ci
Los Alamitos
Orange
0.008%
0.0069190%
City
Mission Viejo
Orange
0.0.14%
0.0117560%
city
Newport Beach
Orange
0.179%
0.1470134%
city
Orange
Oran e
0.150%
0.1231320%
city
Placentia
Orange
0.029%
0.035%
0.0298912%
Ci
Rancho Santa Mar arita
Orange
0.001%
0.0006296%
City
San Clemente
Orange
0,008%
0.010%
0.0086083%
Ci!j
San Juan Capistrano
Oran e
0.008%
0.0065510%
citySanta
Ana
Oran e
0.502%
0,614%
0.5213866%
city
Seal Beach
Oran e
0.020%
0.0165891%
city
Stanton
Orange
0.035%
0.0291955%
city
Tustin
Orange
0.073%
0.0600341%
city
Westminster
Orange
0.104%
0.127%
0.1082721%
mitt. 'm
7of 0
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Yorba Linda
Orange
0,044%
0.0362223%
County
Placer County
Placer
1.045%
1.278%
1.0861002%
city
Auburn
Placer
0.017%
0.0141114%
city
Lincoln.
Placer
0,031%
0.0255599%
city
Rocklin
Placer
0.076%
0,0625485%
PaPhcipatmg-
Sybdmsion
Cla'ssilication
Participating Subdms�on '
County
Abent
atem
Percentage
'Plaintiff
Subdrvision -
Percents a
Weibted
Allca6on
Perce`nta e
Ci
Roseville
Placer
0.196%
0.1616559%
County
Plumas County
Plumas
0,205%
0.251%
0.2128729%
Coun
Riverside County
Riverside
4,534%
5,547%
4.7128296%
city
Banning
Riverside
1 0.017%
0.0143848%
Ci
Beaumont
Riverside
0.021%
0.0171135%
cilL
Blythe
Riverside
0.012%
0.0096714%
city
Canyon Lake
Riverside
0.000%
0.0001761%
city
Cathedral City
Riverside
0.067%
0.0553614%
Ci
Coachella
Riverside
0,021%
0.0173054%
city
Corona
Riverside
0,147%
0.1207083%
city
Desert Hot Springs
Riverside
0.024%
0.0200433%
Ci
Eastvale
Riverside
0.000%
0.0002747%
city
Hemet
Riverside
0,051%
0.0421792%
city
Indio
Riverside
0.056%
0.0457794%
Ci
Juru a Valley
Riverside
0.001%
0.0008991%
cilx
Lake Elsinore
Riverside
0,021%
0.0172949%
city
La Quinta
Riverside
0,063%
0.0516732%
city
Menifee
Riverside
0,032%
0.0260909%e
Ci
Moreno Valley
Riverside
0.137%e
0.1130348%
Ci!j
Murrieta
Riverside
0.048%
0,059%
0.0497423%
city
Norco
Riverside
0.016%
0,0134542%
city
Palm Desert
Riverside
0.083%
0.0682465%e
city
Palm Springs
Riverside
0,076%
0.0629862%
Cil,
Perris
Riverside
0.009%
0.0076774%
city
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
0.052%
0.0431098%
Ci
Riverside
Riverside
0.268%
0.2206279%
city
San Jacinto
Riverside
0.010%e
0.0085936%
city
Temecula
Riverside
0.022%
0.0180086%
city
Wildomar
Riverside
0.008%
0.0062500%
o :o
8 o f p
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sacrmnento County
Sacramento
3.797%
4.645%
3.9465887%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percents e
cityCitrus
Heights
Sacramento
0.057%
0.0465312%
cityElk
Grove
Sacramento
0.130%
0.1066994%
City
Folsom
Sacramento
0.108%
0.0890850%
city
Galt
Sacramento
0.017%
0.0143704%
City
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento
0.008%
0.0067679%
City
Sacramento
Sacramento
0.721%
0.882%
0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito
0.106%
0.130%
0.1101417%
City
Hollister
San Benito
0.027%
0.0225355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino
3.259%
3.987%
3.3878124%
city
Adelanto
San Bernardino
0.008%
0.0066640%
City
Apple Valley
San Bernardino
0.025%
0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino
0.015%
0.0122056%
City
Chino
San Bernardino
0.064%
0.0525893%
City
Chino Hills
San Bernardino
0.001%
0.0006388%
city
Colton
San Bernardino
0.031%
0.0253443%
city
Fontana
San Bernardino
0.112%
0.0920.543%
City
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino
0.006%
0.0051051%
City
Hesperia
San Bernardino
0.035%
0.0291522%
city
Highland
San Bernardino
0.004%
0.0029061%
city
Loma Linda
San Bernardino
0.009%
0.0071188%
city
Montclair
San Bernardino
0.039%
0.0322108%
city
Ontario
San Bernardino
0.179%
0.1472934%
city
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino
0.084%
0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San Bernardino
0.057%
0.0469150%
city
Rialto
San Bernardino
0.073%
0.0603206%
city
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
0.178%
0.1461880%
city
Twent nine Palms
San Bernardino
0.002%
0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino
0.052%
0.0424460%
City
Victorville
San Bernardino
0.033%
0.0269400%
City
Yucaipa
San Bernardino
0.016%
0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
o
a�
9of p_
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino
0.003%
0.0021228%
County
San Diego County
San Diego
5.706%
6.980%
5.9309748%
city
Carlsbad
San Diego
0.128%
0.1050485%
city
Chula Vista
San Diego
0.189%
0.231%
0.1961456%
city
Coronado
San Diego
0.044%
0.0359095%
city
El Cajon
San Diego
0.113%
0.0933582%
City
Encinitas
San Diego
0.061%
0.074%
0.0630289%
city
Escondido
San Diego
0.145%
0.1192204%
City
Imperial Beach
San Diego
0.014%
0.0118283%
City
La Mesa
San Diego
0.055%
0.068%
0.0575593%
City
Lemon Grove
San Diego
0.022%
0.0183911%
City
National City
San Diego
0.080%
0.0656808%
Citv
Oceanside
San Diego
0.213%
0.1753428%
Ci
Poway
San Diego
0.062%
0.0511040%
City
San Diego
San Diego
1.975%
2.416%
2.0531169%
City
San Marcos
San Diego
0.089%
0.0733897%
city
Santee
San Diego
0.033%
0.0268401%
City
Solana Beach
San Diego
0.017%
0.0138564%
City
Vista
San Diego
0.052%
0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco
3.026%
3.702%
3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin Counh,
San Joaquin
1.680%
1 2.055%
1.7460399%
city
Lathrop
San Joaquin
0.009%
0.0075394%
city
Lodi
San Joaquin
0.053%
0.0439484%
city
Manteca
San Joaquin
0.054%
0.0443454%
City
Ripon
San Joaquin
0.013%
0.0104219%
city
Stockton
San Joaquin
0.313%
0.383%
0.3256176%
city
Tracy
San Joaquin
0.084%
0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo
0.816%
0.999%
0.8484126%
City
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obis o
0.024%
0.0199053%
Ci
Atascadero
San Luis Obis o
0.029%
0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo
0.043%
0.0353456%
City
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo
0.017%
0.0137881%
city
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo
0.020%
0.0160922%
city
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obisno
0.077%
0.0637841%
lOc om
mwo
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
County
San Mateo County
San Mateo
1.074%
1.313%
1.1159599%
City
Belmont
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0169860%
City
Burlingame
San Mateo
0.019%
0.0152537%
City
Daly City
San Mateo
0.044%
0.0363880%
City
East Palo Alto
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0103982%
City
Foster City
San Mateo
0.020%
0.0166101%
City
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo
0.004%
0.0031638%
City
Hillsborough
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0110029%
City
Menlo Park
San Mateo
0.015%
0.0126209%
City
Millbrae
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0105836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo
0.016%
0.0130625%
city
Redwood City
San Mateo
0.056%
0.0463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0172161%
City
San Carlos
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0108885%
city
San Mateo
San Mateo
0.052%
0.0425841%
City
South San Francisco
San Mateo
0.043%
0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara Count))
Santa Barbara
1.132%
1.385%
1.1768968%
city
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara
0.001%
0.0008938%
city
Goleta
Santa Barbara
0.004%
0.0028969%
city
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
0.047%
0.0389379%
city
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
0.122%
0.1004559%
city
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara
0.058%
0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara
2.404%
2.941%
2.4987553%
City
Campbell
Santa Clara
0.014%
0.0112566%
city
Cupertino
Santa Clara
0.008%
0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara
0.025%
0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Los Altos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103338%
city
Los Gatos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103220%
city
Milpitas
Santa Clara
0.036%
0.0298120%
city
Morgan Hill
Santa Clara
0.015%
0.0124619%
city
Mountain View
Santa Clara
0.0334608%
CityPalo
Alto
Santa Clara
0.0323080%
CitySan
Jose
Santa Clara
M
0.360%
0.3054960%
citySanta
Clara
Santa Clara
0.0549723%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Saratoga
Santa Clara
0.004%
0.0034161%
city
Sunnvvale
Santa Clara
0.053%
0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz
0.783%
0.957%
0.8135396%
city
Ca itola
Santa Cruz
0.020%
0.0168191%
City
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
0.143%
0.1180348%
City
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz
0.015%
0.0126525%
city
Watsonville
Santa Cruz
0.063%
0.0520136%
County
Shasta County
Shasta
1.095%
1.339%
1.1380191%
city
Anderson
Shasta
0.024%
0.0198896%
city
Redding
Shasta
0.284%
0.2334841%
city
Shasta Lake
Shasta
0.004%
0.0031993%
Countv
Siski ou County
Siski ou
0.228%
0.279%
0.2373393%
Comity
Solano County
Solano
0.760%
0.6260795%
city
Benicia
Solano
0.031%
0.0253903%
City
Dixon
Solano
0.016%
0.0130849%
city
Fairfield
Solano
0.109%
0.0897317%
city
Suisun City
Solano
0.021%
0.0176183%
city
Vacaville
Solano
0.119%
0.0976497%
city
Vallejo
Solano
0.167%
0.1373644%
County
Sonoma County
Sonoma
1.218%
1.490%
1.2661290%
city
Healdsburg
Sonoma
0.032%
0.0266929%
City
Petaluma
Sonoma
0.081%
0.0667507%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Alleation
Percentage
city
Rohnert Park
Sonoma
0.041%
0.0340759%
Ci ,
Santa Rosa
Sonoma
0.184%
0.1519070%
City
Sonoma
Sonoma
0.022%
0.0183438%
City
Windsor
Sonoma
0.016%
0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus
1.722%
1.4182273%
Citv
Ceres
Stanislaus
0.041%
0.0340260%
City
Modesto
Stanislaus
0.217%
0.1788759%
city
Newman
Stanislaus
0.006%
0.0046964%
city
Oakdale
Stanislaus
0.018%
0.0145531 %
city
Patterson
Stanislaus
0.015%
0.0126590%
City
Riverbank
Stanislaus
0.010%
0.0085699%
city
Turlock
Stanislaus
0.065%
0.0531966%
111
12c 01100
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Coun!X
Sutter Count
Sutter
0.306%
0,374%
0.3179548%
city
Yuba City
Sutter
0.074%
0.0606242%
County
Tehama County
Tehama
0.213%
0,261%
0.2216654%
Ci
Red Bluff
Tehama
0.014%
0.0117771%
County
TfiniLv CounLv
Trinity
0,082%
0.101%
0.08.55476%
County
Tulare County
Tulare
0.809%
0,990%
0.8410949%
city
Dinuba
Tulare
0,014%
0.0116929%
Ci
Exeter
Tulare
0.004%
0.0032479%
city
Farmersville
Tulare
0.003%
0.0027879%
Ci
Lindsay
Tulare
0.007%
0.0057111%
city
Porterville
Tulare
0.021%
0.0171845%
Ci
Tulare
Tulare
0.037%
0.0302273%
city
Visalia
Tulare
0.066%
0.0545872%
County
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne
0.486%
0.594%
0.5047621%
County
Ventura County
Ventura
2,192%
2.681%
2.2781201%
CL
Camarillo
Ventura
0,002%
0.0012815%
city
Fillmore
Ventura
0.002%
0:0020294%
city
Moorpark
Ventura
0.008%
0.0067337%
Panc��pahng
Subdms�on s
vClas`siticafioil �- ,«
Partpatmg Subdrvdsion
-
County '
Abaement
t
Percents a
g
Plamtdi
SuUdmsion
�P.ercenta a-;;
Wejlghted
Allcahon
,Perceuta a �:'
Cil,
Oxnard
Ventura
0.156%
0.190%
0.1617338%
city
Port Hueneme
Ventura
0,021%
0.0174145%
CiLy
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura
0.085%
0.0702181%
city
Santa Paula
Ventura
0.014%
0,0119072%
city
Simi Valley
Ventura
0.065%
0,0533043%
C Ltz
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
0.022%
0.0179902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo
0.357%
0.437%
0.3713319%
city
Davis
Yolo
0.055%
0.0451747%
city
West Sacramento
Yolo
0.066%
0.0544321%
city
Woodland
Yolo
0.058%
0.0477904%
Count
Yuba CountE
Yuba
0.214%
0.262%
0.2225679%
City
Marysville
Yuba
0.014%
1
0.0112079%
13c p.,�
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate
Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political
subdivisions eligible to participate in the Apotex Settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of the City of Santa Ana, the City of Santa Ana, its
counsel Robins Kaplan LLP, and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of
California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop
Agreement).
The City of Santa Ana and Robins Kaplan LLP intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a
State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on
Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Apotex Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, the City of Santa Ana may, subject to the limitations of the
Apotex Settlement Agreement and CA Apotex Allocation Agreement, as well as any other
limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Apotex Settlement CA
Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to Robins Kaplan LLP. Any such payment from
the City of Santa Ana to Robins Kaplan LLP from the City of Santa Ana's CA Subdivision Fund
allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF
THE 15%] out of the City of Santa Ana's 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further
that such payments, together with any contingency -fees that Robins Kaplan LLP may receive
from the Attorney Fee Fund will not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross
recovery of the City of Santa Ana from the Apotex Settlement Agreement.
Robins Kaplan LLP certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund
created under the Apotex Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this
backstop agreement. Robins Kaplan LLP further certify that they are not seeking and will not
accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back -
Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Apotex Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to
be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the
California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop
Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payipeM of any state fiinds to
the C'ty of Santa Ana, Robins Kaplan, or an oth party.
j) , 2025
Alvaro Nunez, City Manager
, 2025
Robins Kaplan LLP
, 2025
ATTEST: ° " ,y [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK] 0 0
1 19 _
Jenni . Hall
LIr-Clerk
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Hikma Settlement
1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Hikma Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision
thereto (the "Hilcma Settlement Agreement"), including Section VI and Exhibit O, the State of
California proposes this agreement (the "CA Hikma Allocation Agreement") to govern the
allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to
Sections V and VI of the Hikma Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this
agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections X or XV of the Hikma
Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Hikma Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA
Hikma Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a
Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or
greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating
Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding
Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Hikma Settlement Agreement.
b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in
California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA
Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or
through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of
California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.
d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a
West -Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. ("Mylan"); Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co.,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS
Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc.,
Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna
Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer
D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies
related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any
state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
❑ E*�o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Hikma Settlement Agreement, as well as
applicable law, and the Hikma Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of
this CA Hikma Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Hikma Allocation Agreement have
the same meaning as in the Hikma Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.
Pursuant to Section VI(D)(1) of the Hikma Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund
payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VI(B)(2) of the
Hikma Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund
payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.
This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California' pursuant to Sections X or XV of
the Hikma Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees, the Additional
Remediation Amount, and the Settlement Product Cash Conversion Amount.'
State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Hikma Settlement Agreement, shall
be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15%
to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the
Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Hilcma Allocation Agreement, and 15%
of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California Allocation"),
70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts Fund"), and 15% to
the California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund"),
A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by
the State for future Opioid Remediation.
B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be
allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed
' For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of
California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of
California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
'All Settlement Product Cash Conversion Amounts paid to California pursuant to Section XV of
the Hikma Settlement Agreement shall be allocated to the State and used by the State for future
Opioid Remediation.
Dr0
2 p
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as
adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or
litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in
Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For
the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and
counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its
Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision,
and will receive payments as provided in the Hikma Settlement Agreement.
c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating
Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its
share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a
AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the
"Distributors Settlement"), that city's Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to
the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the
Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change
in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment
Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to
be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the
county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance
with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in
accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct
payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share,
with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund
Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Hikma
Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and
Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating
Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund
that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund,
become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered
within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Hikma Settlement Agreement and
this CA Hikma Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however,
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA
Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must
be transferred to the State..
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or
more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to
the Hikma Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA
Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will
be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities
within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program;
(2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD") treatment infrastructure;
(3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including
sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted
by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by
providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn)
and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability,
restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited
to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice -impacted youth, youth experiencing
adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or
(6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for
opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but
not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS
will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating
Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Hikma Settlement
Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private
sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement
Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for
Opioid Remediation consistent with the Hikma Settlement Agreement and this CA
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Hikma Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may
agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among
themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating
Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being
reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds
must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may
regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Hikma Settlement Agreement
and this CA Hikma Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement
Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Hilcma Settlement Agreement or this CA Hikma
Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other
sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating
Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the
Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to
meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and
confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise
enforce the requirements of the Hikma Settlement Agreement or this CA Hikma
Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be
brought, as to a specific expenditure of fiends, more than five years after the date on
which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this
agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or
constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits,
investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal
enforcement actions.
C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the
Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used,
subject to any limits imposed by the Hikma Settlement Agreement and this CA Hikma
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-
related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation
However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision
Funds be used for litigation -related fees and expenses.
D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee
agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its
contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement
agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its
share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee counsel
("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Hikma Settlement
Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any
payments to contingency -fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such
Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision's total gross recovery under
this Hikma Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments
made under a State Back -Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid
Abatement use requirements under Section VI.B.I of the Hikma Settlement Agreement. Before
seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private counsel
representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney
Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Hikma Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel
may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of
Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California
Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the
request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and
its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney
General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into
agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or
enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any
duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without
limitation the Attorney General.
1904. IRE
6 RIM
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the
settlement until those fiends are frilly expended and for one year thereafter. These reports
will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement
will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those
funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a
certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the
settlement have been used in compliance with the Hikma Settlement Agreement and this
CA Hikma Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by
DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives
of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts
Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible
solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for
oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city
within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions'
expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will
be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision.
d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and
expenditures, as required by the Hikma Settlement Agreement and this CA Hikma
Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the
CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must
identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used,
including if used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to
Section V(B)(2) of the Hikma Settlement Agreement, such information must also be
reported to the Settlement Fund. Administrator and Hikma.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to
discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the
State and Participating Subdivisions.
6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA
Hikma Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet
and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated
motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Hikma Settlement Agreement, this CA Hilcma Allocation
Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable
by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Hikma Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this
agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of
such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this
agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d) Except as provided in the Hikma Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be
governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
The undersigned, Santa Ana city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California
State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Hikma
Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Hikma Settlement and
ACCEPTS this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Hikma Settlement.
Signature: Zw
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: Cily Manager
Date: [/ G �r—
Approved as to Form:
aaw(p- �
Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX .1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights,
releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and
Use of Settlement Funds—Hikma Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change,
Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the
column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.13.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation
share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the
column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial
Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding
the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100V refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California
Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.13. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,"
the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of"100V refers to one -hundred percent
(100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
1 nn_nnn% 1 nn WHO/ 1 fin nnno/.
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County
Alameda County
Alameda
2.332%
2.853%
2.4237952%
city
Alameda
Alameda
0.069%
0.0570162%
city
Albany
Alameda
0.013%
0.0107768%
City
Berkeley
Alameda
0.152%
0.1249656%
city
Dublin
Alameda
0.033%
0.040%
0.0338810%
city
Emeryville
Alameda
0.023%
0.0185765%
city
Fremont
Alameda
0.108%
0.0888576%
city
Hayward
Alameda
0.117%
0.0966218%
city
Livermore
Alameda
0.054%
0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda
0.026%
0.0217626%
City
Oakland
Alameda
0.486%
0.595%
0.5055601%
city
Piedmont
Alameda
0.014%
0.0114064%
city
Pleasanton
Alameda
0.067%
0.0554547%
city
San Leandro
Alameda
0.039%
0.0321267%
city
Union City
Alameda
0.043%
0.0352484%
County
Arnador County
Amador
0.226%
0.277%
0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte
1.615%
1.975%
1.6783178%
city
Chico
Butte
0.216%
0.264%
0.2246499%
city
Oroville
Butte
0.079%
0.0646595%
County
Calaveras County
Calaveras
0.226%
0.277%
0.2351644%
-County
Colusa County
Colusa
0.059%
0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa
2.102%
2.571%
2.1844585%
city
Antioch
Contra Costa
0.037%
0.0301879%
city
Brentwood
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0215339%
city
Clayton
Contra Costa
0.002%
0.0018060%
City
Concord
Contra Costa
0.055%
0.0456676%
city
Danville
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0082255%
city
El Cerrito
Contra Costa
0.023%
0.0189024%
city
Hercules
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Mn
Plati f
Subdivision
Percentage
ted Weigh
Allcation
Percentage
city
Lafayette
Contra Costa
0.006%
1
0.0046030%
Docusign Envelope ID: 01EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Martinez
Contra Costa
0.012%
0.0098593%
city
Moraga
Contra Costa
0.004%
0.0031007%
city
Oakley
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0079416%
city
Orinda
Contra Costa
0.005%
0.0038157%
city
Pinole
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0110909%
city
PittsburgContra
Costa
0.053%
0.0436369%
city
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0106309%
city
Richmond
Contra Costa
0.146%
0.1201444%
city
San Pablo
Contra Costa
0.018%
0.0148843%
city
San Ramon
Contra Costa
0.021%
0.0176459%
city
Wahurt Creek
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte
0.114%
0.140%
0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado
0.768%
0.939%
0.7980034%
city
Placerville
El Dorado
0.015%
0.0127642%
City
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
0.081%
0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno
1.895%
2.318%
1.9693410%
city
Clovis
Fresno
0.065%
0.0536211%
city
Coalinga
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098554%
city
Fresno
Fresno
0.397%
0.3270605%
city
Kerman
Fresno
0.005%
0.0042534%
city
Kingsburg
Fresno
0.008%
0.0066167%
city
Mendota
Fresno
0.002%
0.0019387%
city
Orange Cove
Fresno
0.004%
0.0035607%
city
Parlier
Fresno
0.008%
0.0069755%
city
Reedley
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098804%
city
Sanger
Fresno
0.018%
0.0146135%
City
Selma
Fresno
0.015%
0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn
0.107%
0.131%
0.1116978%
County
Humboldt Coun
Humboldt
1.030%
1.260%
1.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
�'4ei ghted
Alleation
Percentage
city
Arcata
Humboldt
0.054%
0.0447660%
city
Eureka
Humboldt
0.117%
0.143%
0.1216284%
city
Fortuna
Humboldt
0.032%
0.0266837%
County
Imperial County
Imperial
0.258%
0.315%
0.2679006%
city
Brawley
Imperial
0.011%
1 0.0087986%
WRR
1E
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX 1
city
Calexico
hn erial
0.019%
0.0152799%
city
El Centro
Imperial
0.158%
0.1302522%
city
Imperial
Imperial
0.006%
0.0048791 %
Count
Inyo County
In o
0.073%
0.089%
0.0754413%
County
Kern County
Kern
2.517%
3.079%
2.6159145%
city
Arvin
Kern
0.006%
0.0046425%
city
Bakersfield
Kern
0.212%
0.1747198%
city
California City
Kern
0.009%
0.0070820%
city
Delano
Kern
0.030%
0.0249316%
city
McFarland
Kern
0.003%
0.0025644%
city
Rid ecrest
Kern
0.015%
0.0120938%
city
Shafter
Kern
0.013%
0.0103417%
city
Tehachapi
Kern
0.009%
0.0073580%
city
Wasco
Kern
0.008%
0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings
0.293%
0.2413469%
city
Avenal
Kings
0.007%
0.0056335%
city
Corcoran
Kings
0.013%
0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings
0.027%
0.0226038%
city
Lemoore
Kings
0.016%
0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake
0.795%
0.6545389%
city
Clearlake
Lake
0.041%
0.050%
0.0426253%
City
Lakeport
Lake
0.021%
0.026%
0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen
0.319%
0.391%
0.3320610%
city
Susanville
Lassen
0.027%
0.0219295%
County
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles
13.896%
16.999%
14.4437559%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement ta
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Mention
Percentage
city
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040024%
City
Alhambra
Los Angeles
0.042%
0.0343309%
city
Arcadia
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0267718%
city
Artesia
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0005100%
City
Azusa
Los Angeles
0.026%
0.0210857%
city
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
0.027%
0.0218520%
city
Bell
Los Angeles
0.008%
0.0068783%
city
Bellflower
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0014485%
City
Bell Gardens
Los Angeles
0.014%
0.0114301%
�4.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-9301-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles
0.065%
0.0534897%
City
Burbank
Los Angeles
0.100%
0.0823132%
city
Calabasas
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048948%
City
Carson
Los Angeles
0.019%
0.0159805%
City
Cerritos
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039682%
City
Claremont
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0082584%
city
Commerce
Los Angeles
0.000%
0.0002971%
City
Compton
Los Angeles
0.044%
0.0361882%
City
Covina
Los Angeles
0.028%
0.0229127%
city
Cudahy
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006020%
City
Culver City
Los Angeles
0.055%
0.0449894%
City
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006993%
city
Downey
Los Angeles
0.052%
0.0429994%
city
Duarte
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0027261%
city
El Monte
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.038%
0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0268020%
city
Gardena
Los Angeles
0.034%
0.0278088%
City
Glendale
Los Angeles
0.166%
0.1366586%
City
Glendora
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134411%
city
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040549%
city
Hawthorne
Los Angeles
0.050%
0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
e
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0145307%
City
Huntington Park
Los Angeles
0.023%
0.0190667%
City
Inglewood
Los Angeles
0.059%
0.0489195%
city
La Canada Flintrid e
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0025565%
City
Lakewood
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039971%
city
La Mirada
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0081572%
City
Lancaster
Los Angeles
0.045%
0.0369689%
City
La Puente
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012999%
city
La Verne
Los Angeles
0.024%
0.0194190%
Citv
Lawndale
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0017731%
Ci
Lomita
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0031940%
city
Long Beach
Los Angeles
0.439%
0.3614151%
City
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
2.715%
3.321%
2.8218811 %
o"
r
4of 0: r
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134345%
City
Malibu
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0019269%
City
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260686%
city
Maywood
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0035528%
city
Monrovia
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0254455%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles
0.030%
0.0250670%
city
Monterey Park
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0256677%
City
Norwalk
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0258228%
City
Palmdale
Los Angeles
0.046%
0.0375827%
city
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles
0.011%
0.0091483%
city
Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.146%
0.1200524%
City
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles
0.111%
0.0911933%
city
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012645%
city
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
0.062%
0.0506992%
City
Rosemead
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
PercentagePercentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
San Dimas
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0022016%
city
San Fernando
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0104837%
city
San Gabriel
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0147726%
city
San Marino
Los Angeles
0.009%
0.0073791%
city
Santa Clarita
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0178167%
City
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles
0.158%
0.1298513%
city
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048646%
city
Signal Hill
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0084884%
City
South El Monte
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039603%
City
South Gate
Los Angeles
0.020%
0.0166272%
City
South Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.012%
0.0095334%
City
Temple City
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles
0.112%
0.0919820%
city
Walnut
Los Angeles::
0.0060%
0.0047305%
cityWest
Covina
Los Angeles
0.049%
0.0404521%
city
West Hollywood
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0108517%
o�o
5of 0�
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Whittier
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260581%
County
Madera County
Madera
0.349%
0.427%
0.3630669%
city
Chowchilla
Madera
0.012%
0.0097332%
city
Madera
Madera
0.039%
0.0318441%
County
Marin Corm[,
Marin
0.564%
0.690%
0.5861325%
Citv
Larkspur
Marin
0.015%
0.0124697%
city
Mill Valley
Marin
0.020%
0.0168401%
city
Novato
Marin
0.028%
0.0229824%
city
San Anselmo
Mann
0.009%
0.0078062%
city
San Rafael
Marin
0.089%
0.0729823%
County
Mariposa County
Mariposa
0.084%
0.103%
0.0876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino
0.439%
0.536%
0.4558394%
City
Ukiah
Mendocino
0.039%
0.0317153%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta e
Countv
Merced County
Merced
0.551%
0.674%
0.5724262%
city
Atwater
Merced
0.024%
0.0195846%
city
Livingston
Merced
0.006%
0.0045873%
city
Los Banos
Merced
0.020%
0.0165142%
city
Merced
Merced
0.061%
0.0500762%
County
Modoc County
Modoc
0.065%
0.080%
0.0678250%
County
Mono County
Mono
0.023%
0.029%
0.0242606%
County
Monterey County
Monterey
0.908%
1.111%
0.9437083%
City
Greenfield
Monterey
0.006%
0.0050552%
city
King City
Monterey
0.005%
0.0037355%
city
Marina
Monterey
0.017%
0.0144098%
city
Monterey
Monterey
0.041%
0.0336540%
City
Pacific Grove
Monterey
0.009%
0.0074842%
City
Salinas
Monterey
0.094%
0.0776576%
city
Seaside
Monterey
0.023%
0.0191772%
city
Soledad
Monterey
0.007%
0.0060870%
County
Napa County
Napa
0.288%
0.352%
0.2994325%
city
American Canyon
Napa
0.017%
0.0136869%
city
Napa
Napa
0.078%
0.0642783%
County
Nevada County
Nevada
0.441%
0.539%
0.4579827%
city
Grass Valley
Nevada
0.024%
0.0197805%
6of p -
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Truckee
Nevada
0.003%
0,0023843%
County
Orange CounLy
Orange
4,364%
5.339%
4.5363576%
CiLy
Aliso Vie'o
Orange
0.014%
0.0113841%
city
Anaheim
Orange
0.554%
0.678%
0.57.59282%
Ci
Brea
Orange
0.086%
0.0708897%
city
Buena Park
Orange
0.087%
0.0714352%
Ci
Costa Mesa
Orange
0.124%
0.152%
0,1288366%
city
Cypress
Orange
0.033%
0.0271937%
City
Dana Point
Orange
0.001%
0.0005560%
Participatwg'.
Subdmswn -
GlassIca tiou
Pa4t�cipat�dg Srrlsdarasaon :-
County
' Abatement
Percentage
1'la�gt�fl
Sulidivu�on
Percents
We�gttted
Allcahon
city
Fountain Valley
Orange
0.055%
0.0455980%
city
Fullerton
Orange
0.137%
0.168%
0.1425744%
City
Garden Grove
Orange
0.213%
0,1752482%
city
Huntington Beach
Orange
0.247%
0.302%
0.2568420%
CiLy
Irvine
Orange
0.139%
0.170%
0,1442350%
City
La una Beach
Orange
0.047%
0.058%
07493043%°
city
La una Hills
Oran e
0,014%
0.0115457%
city
Laguna Niuel
Orange
0,001%
0.0007071%
city
La una Woods
Orange
0.001%
0,0006546%
Ci
La Habra
Orange
0.060%
0.073%
0.0621049%
Ci
Lake Forest
Oran c
0.012%
0.0101249%
Cit
La Palma
Orange
0.012%
0,0095439%
city
Los Alamitos
Orande
0,008%
0.0069190%
Ci
Mission Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0117560%
Ci
Newport Beach
Oran e
0.179%
0.1470134%
city
Orange
Orange
0.150%
0.1231320%°
Ci
Placentia
Orange
0.029%
0.035%
0.0298912%
city
Rancho Santa Margarita
Oran e
0.001%°
0.0006296%
Ci
San Clemente
Oran e
0.008%
0.010%
0.0086083%
Ci
San Juan Capistrano
Orange
0.008%
0.0065510%
city
Santa Ana
Orange
0.502%
0.614%
0.5213866%
city
Seal Beach
Orange
0.020%
0.0165891%
city
Stanton
Orange
0,035%
0.0291955%
city
Tustin
Orange
0.073%
0,0600341%
city
Westminster
Orange
0.104%
0.127%
0.1082721%
Off' 'O
7of o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-EB2ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Yorba Linda
Orange
0.044%
0.0362223%
County
Placer Couqy
Placer
1.045%
1.278%
1.0861002%
city
Auburn
Placer
0.017%
0.0141114%
city
Lincoln
Placer
0.031%
0.0255599%
City
Rocklin
Placer
0.076%
0.0625485%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Coun �
Abatement
Percentage
g
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Roseville
Placer
0.196%
0.1616559%
County
Phimas Couqy
Plumas
0.205%
0.251%
0.2128729%
County
Riverside Counh'
Riverside
4.534%
5.547%
4.7128296%
City
Banning
Riverside
0.017%
0.0143848%
city
Beaumont
Riverside
0.021%
0.0171135%
city
Blythe
Riverside
0.0120/
0.0096714%
city
Canyon Lake
Riverside
0.000%
0.0001761%
City
Cathedral City
Riverside
0.067%
0.0553614%
City
Coachella
Riverside
0.021%
0.0173054%
City
Corona
Riverside
0.147%
0.1207083%
City
Desert Hot Springs
Riverside
0.024%
0.0200433%
City
Eastvale
Riverside
0.000%
0.0002747%
City
Hemet
Riverside
0.051%
0.0421792%
City
Indio
Riverside
0.056%
0.0457794%
City
Juru a Valley
Riverside
0.001%
0.0008991%
city
Lake Elsinore
Riverside
0.021%
0.0172949%
City
La Quinta
Riverside
0.063%
0.0516732%
city
Menifee
Riverside
0.032%
0.0260909%
City
Moreno Valley
Riverside
0.137%
0.1130348%
City7u
rieta
Riverside
0.048%
0.059%
0.0497423%
city
Norco
Riverside
0.016%
0.0134542%
city
Palm Desert
Riverside
0.083%
0.0682465%
city
Palm Springs
Riverside
0.076%
0.0629862%
city
Perris
Riverside
0.009%
0.0076774%
City
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
0.052%
0.0431098%
city
Riverside
Riverside
0.268%
0.2206279%
city
San Jacinto
Riverside
0.010%
0.0085936%
city
[--City
Temecula
Riverside
0.022%
0.0180,086%
Wildomar
Riverside
0.008%
0.0062500%
NONE o+=' . ❑
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sacramento County
Sacramento
3.797%
4.645%
3.9465887%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Citrus Heights
Sacramento
0.057%
0.0465312%
city
Elk Grove
Sacramento
0.130%
0.1066994%
City
Folsom
Sacramento
0.108%
0.0890850%
city
Galt
Sacramento
0.017%
0.0143704%
City
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento
0.008%
0.0067679%
City
Sacramento
Sacramento
0.721%
0.882%
0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito
0.106%
0.130%
0.1101417%
city
Hollister
San Benito
0.027%
0.0225355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino
3.259%
3.987%
3.3878124%
city
Adelanto
San Bernardino
0.008%
0.0066640%
City
Apple Valley
San Bernardino
0.025%
0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino
0.015%
0.0122056%
City
Chino
San Bernardino
0.064%
0.0525893%
City
Chino Hills
San Bernardino
0.001%
0.0006388%
City
Colton
San Bernardino
0.031%
0.0253443%
City
Fontana
San Bernardino
0.112%
0.0920543%
city
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino
0.006%
0.0051051%
city
Hesperia
San Bernardino
0.035%
0.0291522%
City
Highland
San Bernardino
0.004%
0.0029061%
City
Loma Linda
San Bernardino
0.009%
0.0071188%
city
Montclair
San Bernardino
0.039%
0.0322108%
City
Ontario
San Bernardino
0.179%
0.1472934%
city
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino
0.084%
0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San Bernardino
0.057%
0.0469150%
city
Rialto
San Bernardino
0.073%
0.0603206%
city
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
0.178%
0.1461880%
city
Twent nine Palms
San Bernardino
0.002%
0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino
0.052%
0.0424460%
City
Victorville
San Bernardino
0.033%
0.0269400%
city
Yucaipa
San Bernardino
0.016%
0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percents a
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
- 9of p
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1785-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino
0.003%
0.0021228%
County
San Diego County
San Diego
5.706%
6.980%
5.9309748%
city
Carlsbad
San Diego
0.128%
0.1050485%
city
Chula Vista
San Diego
0.189%
0.231%
0.1961456%
city
Coronado
San Diego
0.044%
0.0359095%
City
El Cajon
San Diego
0.113%
0.0933582%
city
Encinitas
San Diego
0.061%
0.074%
0.0630289%
City
Escondido
San Diego
0.145%
0.1192204%
city
Imperial Beach
San Diego
0.014%
0.0118283%
city
La Mesa
San Diego
0.055%
0.068%
0.5575593%
City
Lemon Grove
San Diego
0.022%
0.0183911%
City
National City
San Diego
0.080%
0.0656808%
city
Oceanside
San Diego
0.213%
0.1753428%
city
Poway
San Diego
0.062%
0.0511040%
City
San Diego
San Diego
1.975%
2.416%
2.0531169%
City
San Marcos
San Diego
0.089%
0.0733897%
City
Santee
San Diego
0.033%
0.0268401%
City
Solana Beach
San Diego
0.017%
0.0138564%
City
Vista
San Diego
0.052%
0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco
3.026%
3.702%
3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin Coun ,
San Joaquin
1.680%
2.055%
1.7460399%
City
Lathrop
San Joaquin
0.009%
0.0075394%
City
Lodi
San Joaquin
0.053%
0.0439484%
City
Manteca
San Joaquin
0.054%
0.0443454%
City
Ripon
San Joaquin
0.013%
0.0104219%
City
Stockton
San Joaquin
0.313%
0383%
0.3256176%
city
Tracy
San Joaquin
0.084%
0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo
0.816%
0.999%
0.8484126%
city
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obispo
0.024%
0.0199053%
City
Atascadero
San Luis Obis o
0.029%
0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percents a
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo
0.043%
0.0353456%
city
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo
0.017%
0.0137881%
city
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo
0.020%
0.0160922%
City
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
0.077%
0.0637841%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1785-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
San Mateo County
San Mateo
1.074%
1.313%
1.1159599%
City
Belmont
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0169860%
City
Burlingame
San Mateo
0.019%
0.0152537%
City
Dal City
San Mateo
0.044%
0.0363880%
City
East Palo Alto
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0103982%
City
Foster City
San Mateo
0.020%
0.0166101%
City
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo
0.004%
0.0031638%
City
Hillsborough
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0110029%
City
Menlo Park
San Mateo
0.015%
0.0126209%
City
Millbrae
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0105836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo
0.016%
0.0130625%
city
Redwood City
San Mateo
0.056%
0.0463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0172161%
City
San Carlos
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0108885%
city
San Mateo
San Mateo
0.052%
0.0425841%
city
South San Francisco
San Mateo
0.043%
0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara County
Santa Barbara
1.132%
1.385%
1.1768968%
city
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara
0.001%
0.0008938%
city
Goleta
Santa Barbara
0.004%
0.0028969%
City
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
0.047%
0.0389379%
City
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
0.122%
0.1004559%
city
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara
0.058%
0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara
2.404%
2.941%
2.4987553%
City
Campbell
Santa Clara
0.014%
0.0112566%
City
Cupertino
Santa Clara
0.008%
0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara
0.025%
0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentalle
city
Los Altos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103338%
city
Los Gatos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103220%
city
Milpitas
Santa Clara
0.036%
0.0298120%
city
Morgan Hill
Santa Clara
0.015%
0.0124619%
city
Mountain View
Santa Clara
0.041%
0.0334608%
city
Palo Alto
Santa Clara
0.039%
0.0323080%
city
San Jose
Santa Clara
0 294%
0.360%
0.3054960%
city
Santa Clara
Santa Clara 1
0.067%
0.0549723%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1785-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Saratoga
Santa Clara
0.004%
0.0034161%
City
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara
0.053%
0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz
0.783%
0.957%
0.8135396%
City
Ca itola
Santa Cruz
0.020%
0.0168191%
City
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
0.143%
0.1180348%
city
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz
0.015%
0.0126525%
City
Watsonville
Santa Cruz
0.063%
0.0520136%
County
Shasta County
Shasta
1.095%
1.339%
1.1380191%
city
Anderson
Shasta
0.024%
0.0198896%
City
Redding
Shasta
0.284%
0.2334841%
City
Shasta Lake
Shasta
0.004%
0.0031993%
County
Siski ou County
Siski ou
0.228%
0.279%
0.2373393%
County
Solano County
Solano
0.760%
0.6260795%
city
Benicia
Solano
0.031%
0.0253903%
city
Dixon
Solano
0.016%
0.0130849%
city
Fairfield
Solano
0.109%
0.0897317%
city
Suisun City
Solano
0.021%
0.0176183%
City
Vacaville
Solano
0.119%
0.0976497%
city
Vallejo
Solano
0.167%
0.1373644%
County
Sonoma County
Sonoma
1.218%
1.490%
1.2661290%
city
Healdsburg
Sonoma
0.032%
0.0266929%
city
Petahmia
Sonoma
0.081%
0.0667507%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcatton
Percentage
city
Rohnert Park
Sonoma
0.041%
0.0340759%
City
Santa Rosa
Sonoma
0.184%
0.1519070%
city
Sonoma
Sonoma
0.022%
0.0183438%
city
Wuidsor
Sonoma
0.016%
0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus
1.722%
1.4182273%
City
Ceres
Stanislaus
0.041%
0.0340260%
city
Modesto
Stanislaus
0.217%
0.1788759%
City
Newman
Stanislaus
0.006%
0.0046964%
city
Oakdale
Stanislaus
0.018%
0.0145531%
City
Patterson
Stanislaus
0.015%
0.0126590%
city
Riverbank
Stanislaus
0.010%
0.0085699%
city
Turlock
Stanislaus
0.065%
0.0531966%
12c �
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sutter County
Sutter
0.306%
0.374%
0.3179548%
city
Yuba City
Sutter
0.074%
0.0606242%
County
Tehanta County
Tehama
0.213%
0.261%
0.2216654%
city
Red Bluff
Tehama
0.014%
5.0117771%
County
TrinitV County
Trinity
0.082%
0.101%
0.0855476%
County
Tulare Coun o
Tulare
0.809%
1 0.990%
0.8410949%
City
Dinuba
Tulare
0.014%
0.0116929%
city
Exeter
Tulare
0.004%
0.0032479%
City
Farmersville
Tulare
0.003%
0.0027879%
City
Lindsay
Tulare
0.007%
0.0057111 %
city
Porterville
Tulare
0.021%
0.0171845%
City
Tulare
Tulare
0.03706
0.0302273%
city
Visalia
Tulare
0.066%
0.0545872%
County
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne
0.486%
0.594%
0.. 7621%
County
Ventura County
Ventura
2.192%
2.681%
2.2781201%
City
Camarillo
Ventura
0.002%
0.0012815%
city
Fillmore
Ventura
0.002%
0.0020294%
City
Moorpark
Ventura
0.008%
0.0067337%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percenta a
Weighted
Alleation
Percentage
City
Oxnard
Ventura
0.156%
0.190%
0.1617338%
city
Port Hueneme
Ventura
0.0210o
0.0174145%
city
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura
0.085%
0.0702181%
city
Santa Paula
Ventura
0.014%
0.0119072%
City
Simi Valley
Ventura
0.065%
0.0533043%
city
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
0.022%
0.0179902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo
0.357%
0.437%
0.3713319%
City
Davis
Yolo
0.055%
0.0451747%
city
West Sacramento
Yolo
0.066%
0.0544321%
City
Woodland
Yolo
0.058%
0.0477904%
County
Yuba County
Yuba
0.214%
0.262%
0.2225679%
city
Marysville
Yuba
0.014%
0.5112079%
13 c
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate
Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political
subdivisions eligible to participate in the Hikma Settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of the City of Santa Ana, the City of Santa Ana, its
counsel Robins Kaplan LLP, and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of
California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop
Agreement).
The City of Santa Ana and Robins Kaplan LLP intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a
State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on
Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Hikma Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, the City of Santa Ana may, subject to the limitations of
the Hikma Settlement Agreement and CA Hikma Allocation Agreement, as well as any other
limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Hikma Settlement CA
Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to Robins Kaplan LLP. Any such payment from
the City of Santa Ana to Robins Kaplan LLP from the City of Santa Ana's CA Subdivision Fund
allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF
THE 15%] out of the the City of Santa Ana's 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided
further that such payments, together with any contingency -fees that Robins Kaplan LLP may
receive from the Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total
gross recovery of the City of Santa Ana from the Hikma Settlement Agreement.
Robins Kaplan LLP certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund
created under the Hikma Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this
backstop agreement. Robins Kaplan LLP further certify that they are not seeking and will not
accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back -
Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Hikma Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to
be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the
California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop
Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does nothequire the patent of any state funds to
the C' of Santa Ana, Robins KaplWAIvaroNufiez,
er
l®` , 2025
City Nfanagw
, 2025
, 2025
By:
Robins Kaplan LLP
[ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK] o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Indivior Settlement
1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Indivior Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision
thereto (the "Indivior Settlement Agreement"), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of
California proposes this agreement (the "CA Indivior Allocation Agreement") to govern the
allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to
Sections IV and V of the Indivior Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this
agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections IX or XIV of the Indivior
Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph.4, of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA
Indivior Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a
Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or
greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating
Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding
Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Indivior Settlement Agreement.
b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in
California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA
Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or
through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of
California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.
d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a
West -Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. ("Mylan"); Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co.,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS
Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc.,
Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna
Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer
D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies
related to or caused by, the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any
state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
MIR
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, as well as
applicable law, and the Indivior Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision
of this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement
have the same meaning as in the Indivior Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.
Pursuant to Section V(D)(1) of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund
payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the
Indivior Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund
payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.
This Agreement does not apply to fiends received by California' pursuant to Sections IX or XIV
of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees, the
Additional Remediation Amount, and the Settlement Product Cash Conversion Amount. 2
4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Indivior Settlement Agreement,
shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and
15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from
the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, and
15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California
Allocation"), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts
Fund"), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund"),
A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by
the State for future Opioid Remediation.
B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be
allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed
'For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of
California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of
California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
'All Settlement Product Cash Conversion Amounts paid to California pursuant to Section XIV of
the Indivior Settlement Agreement shall be allocated to the State and used by the State for future
Opioid Remediation.
2
o o
❑n•yr+
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as
adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or
litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in
Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For
the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and
counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its
Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision,
and will receive payments as provided in the Indivior Settlement Agreement.
c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating
Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its
share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a
AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the
"Distributors Settlement"), that city's Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to
the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the
Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change
in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment
Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to
be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the
county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance
with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in
accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct
payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share,
with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund
Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA
Indivior Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San
Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become
Participating Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund
that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund,
become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered
within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Indivior Settlement Agreement
and this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA
Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must
be transferred to the State..
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or
more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to
the Indivior Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA
Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will
be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities
within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program;
(2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD")treatment infrastructure;
(3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including
sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted
by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by
providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn)
and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability,
restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited
to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice -impacted youth, youth experiencing
adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or
(6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for
opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but
not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS
will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating
Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Indivior Settlement
Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private
sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement
Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for
Opioid Remediation consistent with the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Indivior Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may
agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among
themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating
Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being
reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds
must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may
regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Indivior Settlement Agreement
and this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement
Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Indivior Settlement Agreement or this CA
Indivior Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from
any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA
Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the
concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the
Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to
meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and
confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise
enforce the requirements of the Indivior Settlement Agreement or this CA Indivior
Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be
brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on
which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this
agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or
constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits,
investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal
enforcement actions.
C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the
Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used,
00�
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
subject to any limits imposed by the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA Indivior
Allocation Agreement, to fiend future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-
related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation
However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision
Funds be used for litigation -related fees and expenses.
D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee
agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its
contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement
agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its
share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee counsel
("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Indivior Settlement
Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any
payments to contingency -fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such
Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision's total gross recovery under
this Indivior Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments
made under a State Back -Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid
Abatement use requirements under Section V.B.1 of the Indivior Settlement Agreement. Before
seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private counsel
representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney
Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Indivior Settlement Agreement. Further, private
counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of
Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California
Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the
request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and
its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney
General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into
agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or
enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any
duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without
limitation the Attorney General.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the
settlement until those funds are frilly expended and for one year thereafter. These reports
will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of fiends from the settlement
will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those
funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a
certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the
settlement have been used in compliance with the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this
CA Indivior Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined
by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with
representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts
Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible
solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for
oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city
within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions'
expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will
be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision.
d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and
expenditures, as required by the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA Indivior
Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the
CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must
identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used,
including if used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to
Section V(B)(2) of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, such information must also be
reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Indivior.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to
discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the
State and Participating Subdivisions.
6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA
Indivior Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet
and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated
motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Indivior Settlement Agreement, this CA Indivior Allocation
Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
0} �
7
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable
by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this
agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of
such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this
agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d) Except as provided in the Indivior Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be
governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
The undersigned, Santa Ana city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California
State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Indivior
Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Indivior Settlement and
ACCEPTS this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds —Indivior Settlement.
_;�z —
Signature:
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: Cijy Manager
Date: 16 ?.�
Approved as to Form:
aawl -a, �
Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1786-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights,
releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and
Use of Settlement Funds—Indivior Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not
change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.13.e., the State of California will receive the
Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA
Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not
an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100V refers to one -hundred percent (1000/0) of the
California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.13, Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage," the annotation of"100V refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant
to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of"100V refers to one -
hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
100.000% 100.0000/. 1nOnnno/
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County
Alameda County
Alameda
2.332%
2.853%
2.4237952%
city
Alameda
Alameda
0.069%
0.0570162%
city
Albany
Alameda
0.013%
0.0107768%
City
Berkeley
Alameda
0.152%
0.1249656%
city
Dublin
Alameda
0.033%
0.040%
0.0338810%
city
Emeryville
Alameda
0.023%
0.0185765%
city
Fremont
Alameda
0.108%
0.0888576%
city
Hayward
Alameda
0.117%
0.0966218%
city
Livermore
Alameda
0.054%
0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda
0.026%
0.0217626%
city
Oakland
Alameda
0.486%
0.595%
0.5055601%
city
Piedmont
Alameda
0.014%
0.0114064%
city
Pleasanton
Alameda
0.067%
0.0554547%
city
San Leandro
Alameda
0.039%
0.0321267%
city
Union City
Alameda
0.043%
0.0352484%
County
Amador County
Amador
0.226%
0.277%
0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte
1.615%
1.975%
1.6783178%
City
Chico
Butte
0.216%
0.264%
0.2246499%
City
Oroville
Butte
0.079%
0.0646595%
County
Calaveras County
Calaveras
0.226%
0.277%
0.2351644%
County
Colusa County
Colusa
0.059%
0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa
2.102%
2.571%
2.1844585%
city
Antioch
Contra Costa
0.037%
0.0301879%
city
Brentwood
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0215339%
city
Clayton
Contra Costa
0.002%
0.0018060%
city
Concord
Contra Costa
0.055%
0.0456676%
City
Danville
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0082255%
city
El Cerrito
Contra Costa
0.023%
0.0189024%
City
Hercules
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Lafayette
Contra Costa
0.006% 1
1
0.0046030%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Martinez
Contra Costa
0.012%
0.0098593%
city
Mora a
Contra Costa
0.004%
0.0031007%
city
Oakley
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0079416%
city
Orinda
Contra Costa
0.005%
0.0038157%
City
Pinole
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0110909%
City
Pittsbur.-
Contra Costa
0.053%
0.0436369%
city
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0106309%
City
Richmond
Contra Costa
0.146%
0.1201444%
city
San Pablo
Contra Costa
0.018%
0.0148843%
city
San Ramon
Contra Costa
0.021%
0.0176459%
city
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte
0.114%
0.140%
0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado
0.768%
0.939%
0.7980034%
city
Placerville
El Dorado
0.015%
0.0127642%
city
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
0.081%
0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno
1.895%
2.318%
1.9693410%
City
Clovis
Fresno
0.065%
0.0536211%
city
Coalinga
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098554%
city
Fresno
Fresno
0.397%
0.3270605%
city
Kerman
Fresno
0.005%
0.0042534%
city
Kingsburg
Fresno
0.008%
0.0066167%
City
Mendota
Fresno
0.002%
0.0019387%
city
Orange Cove
Fresno
0.004%
0.0035607%
city
Parlier
Fresno
0.008%
0.0069755%
city
Reedle y
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098804%
city
Sanger
Fresno
0.018%
0.0146135%
City
Selma
Fresno
0.015%
0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn
0.107%
1 0.131%
0.1116978%
County
Humboldt County
Humboldt
1.030%
1.260%
1.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Arcata
Humboldt
0.054%
0.0447660%
city
Eureka
Humboldt
0.117%
0.143%
0.1216284%
city
Fortuna
Humboldt
0.032%
0.0266837%
County
Imperial Coun
Imperial
0.258%
0.315%
0.2679006%
City
Brawley
Im perial
0.011%
0.0087986%
o :o
2of o,
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Calexico
Imperial
0.019%
0.0152799%
city
El Centro
Imperial
0.158%
0.1302522%
City
Imperial
Imperial
0.006%
0.0048791%
County
Ingo County
In o
0.073%
0.089%
0.0734413%
County
Kern County
Kern
2.517%
3.079%
2.6159145%
City
Arvin
Kern
0.006%
0.0046425%
city
Bakersfield
Kern
0.212%
0.1747198%
city
California City
Kern
0.009%
0.0070820%
city
Delano
Kern
0.030%
0.0249316%
city
McFarland
Kern
0.003%
0.0025644%
city
Rid ecrest
Kern
0.015%
0.0120938%
city
Shaffer
Kern
0.013%
0.0103417%
city
Tehachapi
Kem
0.009%
0.0073580%
city
Wasco
Kern
0.008%
0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings
0.293%
0.2413469%
city
Avenal
Kings
0.007%
0.0056335%
city
Corcoran
Kings
0.013%
0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings
0.027%
0.0226038%
city
Lemoore
Kings
0.016%
0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake
0.795%
0.6545389%
city
Clearlake
Lake
0.041%
0.050%
0.0426253%
City
Lakeport
Lake
0.021%
0.026%
0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen
0.319%
0.391%
0.3320610%
City
Susanville
Lassen
0.027%
0.0219295%
County
Los An eles Co�
Los Angeles
13.896%
16.999%
14.4437559%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
mwummmmmmiwAbatement
County
Percentage
g
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040024%
City
Alhambra
Los Angeles
0.042%
0.0343309%
city
Arcadia
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0267718%
city
Artesia
Los An eles
0.001%
0.0005100%
City
Azusa
Los Angeles
0.026%
0.0210857%
city
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
0.0270%o
0.0218520%
Bell
Los An eles0008%
0.0068783%
Ci
Bellflower
Los An eles002%
�0...
0.0014485%
Ci
Bell Gardens
Los An eles14%
00Ci
0.0114301%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles
0.065%
0.0534897%
City
Burbank
Los Angeles
0.100%
0.0823132%
City
Calabasas
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048948%
city
Carson
Los Angeles
0.019%
0.0159805%
City
Cerritos
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039682%
City
Claremont
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0082584%
City
Commerce
Los Angeles
0.000%
0.0002971%
City
Compton
Los Angeles
0.044%
0.0361882%
City
Covina
Los Angeles
0.028%
0.0229127%
City
Cudahy
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006020%
City
Culver City
Los Angeles
0.055%
0.0449894%
City
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006993%
City
Downey
Los Angeles
0.052%
0.0429994%
city
Duarte
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0027261%
city
El Monte
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.038%
0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0268020%
city
Gardena
Los Angeles
0.034%
0.0278088%
City
Glendale
Los Angeles
0.166%
0.1366586%
city
Glendora
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134411%
city
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040549%
city
Hawthorne
Los Angeles
0.050%
0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
e
PercentagPercents
Plaintiff
Subdivision
a
weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0145307%
city
Huntington Park
Los Angeles
0.023%
0.0190667%
City
Inglewood
Los Angeles
0.059%
0.0489195%
city
La Canada Flintrid e
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0025565%
City
Lakewood
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039971%
City
La Mirada
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0081572%
City
Lancaster
Los Angeles
0.045%
0.0369689%
City
La Puente
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012999%
City
La Verne
Los Angeles
0.024%
0.0194190%
City
Lawndale
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0017731%
city
Lomita
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0031940%
city
Long Beach
Los Angeles
0.439%
0.3614151%
City
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
2.715%
3.321%
2.8218811 %
o
r
4of Der•
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134345%
City
Malibu
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0019269%
City
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260686%
City
Maywood
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0035528%
City
Monrovia
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0254455%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles
0.030%
0.0250670%
City
Monterey Park
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0256677%
city
Norwalk
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0258228%
city
Palmdale
Los Angeles
0.046%
0.0375827%
City
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles
0.011%
0.0091483%
City
Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.146%
0.1200524%
City
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles
0.111%
0.0911933%
City
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012645%
City
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
0.062%
0.0506992%
Ci
Rosemead
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Percentage
PlaintiffAbatementPlaintiffWeighted
Subdivision
Percentage
Allcation
Percentage
city
San Dimas
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0022016%
City
San Fernando
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0104837%
city
San Gabriel
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0147726%
City
San Marino
Los Angeles
0.009%
0.0073791%
City
Santa Clarita
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0178167%
City
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles
0.158%
0.1298513%
City
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048646%
City
Signal Hill
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0084884%
City
South El Monte
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039603%
City
South Gate
Los Angeles
0.020%
0.0166272%
city
South Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.012%
0.0095334%
City
Temple City
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles
0.112%
0.0919820%
City
Walnut
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0047305%
City
West Covina
Los Angeles
0.049%
0.0404521%
City
West Hollywood
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0108517%
o��o•
5of ��
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX 1
City
Whittier
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260581 %
County
Madera County
Madera
0.349%
0.427%
0.3630669%
City
Chowchilla
Madera
0.012%
0.0097332%
City
Madera
Madera
0.039%
0.0318441%
County
Marin County
Mann
0.564%
0.690%
0.5861325%
City
Larkspur
Marin
0.015%
1
0.0124697%
City
Mill Valley
Marin
0.020%
0.0168401%
city
Novato
Marin
0.028%
0.0229824%
City
San Anselmo
Marin
0.009%
0.0078062%
City
San Rafael
Marin
0.089%
0.0729823%
County
Mariposa County
Mariposa
0.084%
0.103%
0.0876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino
0.439%
0.536%
0.4558394%
City
Ukiah
Mendocino
0.039%
0.0317153%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County
Merced County
Merced
0.551%
0.674%
0.5724262%
city
Atrivater
Merced
0.024%
0.0195846%
City
Livingston
Merced
0.006%
0.0045873%
city
Los Banos
Merced
0.020%
0.0165142%
city
Merced
Merced
0.061%
0.0500762%
County
Modoc County
Modoc
0.065%
0.080%
0.0678250%
County
Mono County
Mono
0.023%
0.029%
0.0242606%
County
Monterey County
Monterey
0.908%
1.111%
0.9437083%
city
Greenfield
Monterey
0.006%
0.0050552%
city
King City
Monterev
0.005%
0.0037355%
City
Marina
Monterey
0.017%
0.0144098%
city
Monterey
Monterey
0.041%
0.0336540%
city
Pacific Grove
Monterey
0.009%
0.0074842%
city
Salinas
Monterey
0.094%
0.0776576%
city
Seaside
Monterey
0.023%
0.0191772%
city
Soledad
Monterey
0.007%
0.0060870%
County
Napa County
Napa
0.288%
0.352%
0.2994325%
city
American Canyon
Napa
0.017%
0.0136869%
city
Napa
Napa �3.441%
.078%
0.0642783%
Count y
Nevada County
Nevada
0.539% 1
0.4579827%
City
Grass Valle
Nevada
0.024%
0.0197805%
o -❑
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Truckee
Nevada
0.003%
0.0023843%
County
Orange County
Orange
4.364%
5.339%
4.5363576%
city
Aliso Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0113841%
city
Anaheim
Orange
0,554%
0,678%
0.5759282%
city
Brea
Orange
0.086%
0.0708897%
city
Buena Park
Orange
0.087%
0.0714352%
Ci
Costa Mesa
Orange
0,124%
0.152%
0.1288366%
city
Cypress
Oran e
0.033%
0.0271937%
city
Dana Point
Orange
0.001%
0.0005560%
PatiJimpatmg
S Ubd�e�s�ou '
Participating Subdms►on
County
Abatement
Z'erce
Plamhff
5ubdmsion
Perceuta e.
Relghted
Allcahon
.Peicen a ..
city
Fountain ValleX
Orange
0,055%
0.0455980%
city
Fullerton
Orange
0.137%
0.168%
0.1425744%
Ci
Garden Grove
Orange
0.213%
0.1752482%
city
Huntin ton Beach
Orange
0.247%
0.302%
0.2568420%
Ci
Irvine
Orange
0.139%
0.170%
0.1442350%
City
Laguna Beach
Orange
0.047%
0.058%
0,0493043%
city
Laguna Hills
Orange
0.014%
0.0115457%
city
Laguna Ni uel
Oran e
0.001%
0.0007071%
Ci
Laguna Woods
Orange
0.001%
0,0006546%
City
La Habra
Orane
0.060%
0.073%
0.0621049%
Ci
Lake Forest
Orange
0.012%
0.0101249%
city
La Palma
Orane
0.012%
0.0095439%
city
Los Alamitos
Orange
0.008%
0.0069190%
city
Mission Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0117560%
Ci
Newport Beach
Orange
0.179%
0.1470134%
C Ltj
Orange
Orange
0.150%
0.1231320%
city
Placentia
Orane
0.029%
0.035%
0.0298912%
city
Rancho Santa Mar arita
Oran e
0.001%
0.0006296%
Ci
San Clemente
Orange
0.008%
0.010%
0.0086083%
city
San Juan Capistrano
Oran e
0.008%
0.0065510%
city
Santa Ana
Orange
0.502%
0.614%
0.5213866%
city
Seal Beach
Orange
0.020%
0.0165891%
Ci!j
Stanton
Orane
0.035%
0.0291955%
Cit
Tustin
Oran e
0.073%
0.0600341%
city
Westminster
Oran e
0.104%
0.127% 1
0.1082721%
MH Io
7of O N
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
city
Yorba Linda
Orange
0.044%
0.0362223%
County
Placer County
Placer
1.045%
1.278%
1.0861002%
city
Auburn
Placer
0.017%
0.0141114%
city
Lincoln
Placer
0.031%
0.0255599%
city
Rocklin
Placer
0.076%
0.0625485%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Roseville
Placer
0.196%
0.1616559%
County
Plumas County
Plumas
0.205%
0.251%
0.2128729%
County
Riverside Coun4,
Riverside
4.534%
5.547%
4.7128296%
City
Banning
Riverside
0.017%
0.0143848%
City
Beaumont
Riverside
0.021%
0.0171135%
City
Blythe
Riverside
0.012%
0.0096714%
City
Canyon Lake
Riverside
0.000%
0.0001761%
City
Cathedral City
Riverside
0.067%
0.0553614%
City
Coachella
Riverside
0.021%
0.0173054%
city
Corona
Riverside
0.147%
0.1207083%
City
Desert Hot Springs
Riverside
0.024%
0.0200433%
city
Eastvale
Riverside
0.000%
0.0002747%
city
Hemet
Riverside
0.051%
0.0421792%
City
Indio
Riverside
0.056%
0.0457794%
City
Jurua Valley
Riverside
0.001%
0.0008991%
City
Lake Elsinore
Riverside
0.021%
0.0172949%
City
La Quinta
Riverside
0.063%
0.0516732%
City
Menifee
Riverside
0.032%
0.0260909%
City
Moreno Valley
Riverside
0.137%
0.1130348%
city
Murrieta
Riverside
0.0480/.
0.059%
0.0497423%
city
Norco
Riverside
0.016%
0.0134542%
city
Palm Desert
Riverside
0.083%
0.0682465%
City
Palm Springs
Riverside
0.076%
0.0629862%
City
Perris
Riverside
0.009%
0.0076774%
City
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
0.052%
0.0431098%
City
Riverside
Riverside
0.268%
0.2206279%
City
San Jacinto
Riverside
0.010%
0.0085936%
city
Temecula
Riverside
0.022%
0.0180086%
City
Wildomar
Riverside
0.008%
0.0062500%
o :o
8of p
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
County
Sacramento County
Sacramento
3.797%
4.645%
3.9465887%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
e percentag
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Citrus Heights
Sacramento
0.057%
0.0465312%
city
Elk Grove
Sacramento
0.130%
0.1066994%
city
Folsom
Sacramento
0.108%
0.0890850%
City
Galt
Sacramento
0.017%
0.0143704%
City
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento
0.008%
0.0067679%
City
Sacramento
Sacramento
0.721%
0.882%
0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito
0.106%
0.130%
0.1101417%
City
Hollister
San Benito
0.027%
0.022.5355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino
3.259%
3.987%
3.3878124%
city
Adelanto
San Bernardino
0.008%
0.0066640%
City
Apple Valley
San Bernardino
0.025%
0.0207360%
city
Barstow
San Bernardino
0.015%
0.0122056%
City
Chino
San Bernardino
0.064%
0.0525893%
City
Chino Hills
San Bernardino
0.001%
0.0506388%
City
Colton
San Bernardino
0.031%
0.0253443%
city
Fontana
San Bernardino
0.112%
0.0920543%
City
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino
0.006%
0.0051051%
City
Hesperia
San Bernardino
0.035%
0.0291522%
city
Highland
San Bernardino
0.004%
0.0029061%
city
Loma Linda
San Bernardino
0.009%
0.0071188%
city
Montclair
San Bernardino
0.039%
0.0322108%
city
Ontario
San Bernardino
0.179%
0.1472934%
city
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino
0.084%
0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San Bernardino
0.057%
0.0469150%
city
Rialto
San Bernardino
0.073%
0.0603206%
city
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
0.178%
0.1461880%
city
Twent nine Palms
San Bernardino
0.002%
0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino
0.052%
0.0424460%
City
Victor -Ville
San Bernardino
0.033%
0.0269400%
city
Yucaipa
San Bernardino
0.016%
0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
0' :1
9of p.
Docusi9n Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino
0.003%
0.0021228%
County
San Diego County
San Diego
5.706%
6.980%
5.9309748%
City
Carlsbad
San Diego
0.128%
0.1050485%
city
Chula Vista
San Diego
0.189%
0.231%
0.1961456%
city
Coronado
San Diego
0.044%
0.0359095%
City
El Cajon
San Diego
0.113%
0.0933582%
City
Encinitas
San Diego
0.061%
0.074%
0.0630289%
city
Escondido
San Diego
0.145%
0.1192204%
city
Imperial Beach
San Diego
0.014%
0.0118283%
city
La Mesa
San Diego
0.055%
0.068%
0.0575593%
City
Lemon Grove
San Diego
0.022%
0.0183911%
city
National City
San Diego
0.080%
0.0656808%
city
Oceanside
San Diego
0.213%
0.1753428%
city
Poway
San Diego
0.062%
0.0511040%
City
San Diego
San Diego
1.975%
2.416%
2.0531169%
city
San Marcos
San Diego
0.089%
0.0733897%
City
Santee
San Diego
0.033%
0.0268401%
City
Solana Beach
San Diego
0.017%
0.0138564%
City
Vista
San Diego
0.052%
0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco
3.026%
3.702%
3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin Count,
San Joaquin
1.680%
2.055%
1.7460399%
City
Lathrop
San Joaquin
0.009%
0.0075394%
city
Lodi
San Joaquin
0.053%
0.0439484%
City
Manteca
San Joaquin
0.054%
0.0443454%
Ci ,
Ripon
San Joaquin
0.013%
0.0104219%
city
Stockton
San Joaquin
0.313%
0.383%
0.3256176%
city
Tracy
San Joaquin
0.084%
0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo Countv
San Luis Obispo
0.816%
0.999%
0.8484126%
city
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obis o
0.024%
0.0199053%
City
Atascadero
San Luis Obis o
0.029%
0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Partici atin Subdivision
p g
Coun
County
Abatement
Percentage
g
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo
0.043%
0.0353456%
city
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo
0.017%
0.0137881%
city
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo
0.020%
0.0160922%
City
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
0.077%
0.0637841%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
County
San Mateo Coun ,
San Mateo
1.0740/.
1.313%
1.1159599%
City
Belmont
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0169860%
City
Burlingame
San Mateo
0.019%
0.0152537%
city
Daly City
San Mateo
0.044%
0.0363880%
City
East Palo Alto
San Mateo
0.013%
5.0103982%
City
Foster City
San Mateo
0.020%
0.0166101%
City
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo
0.004%
0.0031638%
city
Hillsborough
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0110029%
City
Menlo Park
San Mateo
0.015%
0.0126209%
City
Millbrae
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0105836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo
0.016%
0.0130625%
city
Redwood City
San Mateo
0.056%
0.0463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0172161%
City
San Carlos
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0108885%
city
San Mateo
San Mateo
0.052%
0.0425841%
City
South San Francisco
San Mateo
0.043%
0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara Couny)
Santa Barbara
1.132%
1385%
1.1768968%
City
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara
0.001%
0.0008938%
city
Goleta
Santa Barbara
0.004%
0.0028969%
city
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
0.047%
0.0389379%
city
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
0.122%
0.1004559%
City
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara
0.058%
0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara
2.404%
2.941%
2.4987553%
City
Campbell
Santa Clara
0.014%
0.0112566%
city
Cupertino
Santa Clara
0.008%
0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara
0.025%
0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Los Altos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103338%
city
Los Gatos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103220%
city
Milpitas
Santa Clara
0.036%
0.0298120%
city
Moran Hill
Santa Clara
0.015%
0.0124619%
city
Mountain View
Santa Clara
0.041%
1
0.0334608%
city
Palo Alto
Santa Clara
0.039%
0.0323080%
City
San Jose
Santa Clara
1
0.294%
0.360%
0.3054960%
city
Santa Clara
Santa Clara
0.067%
0.0549723%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Saratoga
Santa Clara
0.004%
0.0034161%
city
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara
0.053%
0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz
0.783%
0.957%
0.8135396%
City
Ca itola
Santa Cruz
0.020%
0.0168191%
City
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
0.143%
0.1180348%
city
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz
0.015%
0.0126525%
City
Watsonville
Santa Cruz
0.063%
0.0520136%
County
Shasta County
Shasta
1.095%
1.339%
1.1380191%
city
Anderson
Shasta
0.024%
0.0198896%
city
Redding
Shasta
0.284%
0.2334841 %
city
Shasta Lake
Shasta
0.004%
0.0031993%
County
Siski ou County
Siski ou
0.228%
0.279%
0.2373393%
County
Solano County
Solano
0.760%
0.6260795%
city
Benicia
Solano
0.031%
0.0253903%
city
Dixon
Solano
0.016%
0.0130849%
City
Fairfield
Solano
0.109%
0.0897317%
city
Suisun City
Solano
0.021%
0.0176183%
city
Vacaville
Solano
0.119%
0.0976497%
city
Vallejo
Solano
0.167%
0.1373644%
County
Sonoma County
Sonoma
1.218%
1.490%
1.2661290%
city
Healdsburg
Sonoma
0.032%
0.0266929%
city
Petaluma
Sonoma
0.081%
0.0667507%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintif
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Rohnert Park
Sonoma
0.041%
0.0340759%
City
Santa Rosa
Sonoma
0.184%
0.1519070%
city
Sonoma
Sonoma
0.022%
0.0183438%
city
Windsor
Sonoma
0.016%
0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus
1.722%
1.4182273%
City
Ceres
Stanislaus
0.041%
0.0340260%
City
Modesto
Stanislaus
0.217%
0.1788759%
City
Newman
Stanislaus
0.006%
0.0046964%
City
Oakdale
Stanislaus
0.018%
0.0145531%
City
Patterson
Stanislaus
0.015%
0.0126590%
City
Riverbank
Stanislaus
0.010%
0.0085699%
city
Turlock
Stanislaus
0.0650/.
0.0531966%
ffal-n�'.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sutter County
Sutter
0.306%
0.374%
0.3179548%
city
Yuba City
Sutter
0.074%
0.0606242%
County
Tehama County
Tehama
0.213%
0.261%
0.2216654%
city
Red Bluff
Tehama
0.014%
0.0117771%
County
Trinity County
Trinity
0.082%
0.101%
0.0855476%
County
Tulare County
Tulare
0.809%
0.990%
0.8410949%
City
Dinuba
Tulare
0.014%
0.0116929%
City
Exeter
Tulare
0.004%
0.0032479%
City
Farmersville
Tulare
0.003%
0.0027879%
City
Lindsay
Tulare
0.007%
0.0057111%
city
Porterville
Tulare
0.021%
0.0171845%
City
Tulare
Tulare
0.037%
0.0302273%
city
Visalia
Tulare
0.066%
0.0545872%
County
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne
0.486%
0.594%
0.5047621 %
County
Ventura Coun ,
Ventura
2.192%
2.681%
2.2781201%
city
Camarillo
Ventura
0.002%
0.0012815%
city
Fillmore
Ventura
0.002%
0.0020294%
City
Moorpark
Ventura
0.008%
0.0067337%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
e
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Oxnard
Ventura
0.156%
0.190%
0.1617338%
city
Port Hueneme
Ventura
0.021%
0.0174145%
city
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura
0.085%
0.0702181%
city
Santa Paula
Ventura
0.014%
0.0119072%
city
Simi Valley
Ventura
0.065%
0.0533043%
city
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
0.022%
0.0179902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo
0.357%
0.437%
0.3713319%
City
Davis
Yolo
0.055%
0.0451747%
city
West Sacramento
Yolo
0.066%
0.0544321%
city
Woodland
Yolo
0.058%
0.0477904%
County
Yuba County
Yuba
0.214%
0.262%
0.2225679%
city
Marysville
Yuba
0.0140/.
0.0112079%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate
Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political
subdivisions eligible to participate in the Indivior Settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of the City of Santa Ana, the City of Santa Ana, its
counsel Robins Kaplan LLP, and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of
California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop
Agreement).
The City of Santa Ana and Robins Kaplan LLP intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a
State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on
Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Indivior Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, the City of Santa Ana may, subject to the limitations of the
Indivior Settlement Agreement and CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, as well as any other
limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Indivior Settlement CA
Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to Robins Kaplan LLP. Any such payment from
the City of Santa Ana to Robins Kaplan LLP from the City of Santa Ana's CA Subdivision Fund
allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF
THE 15%] out of the City of Santa Ana's 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further
that such payments, together with any contingency -fees that Robins Kaplan LLP may receive
from the Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross
recovery of the City of Santa Ana from the Indivior Settlement Agreement.
Robins Kaplan LLP under the Indivior Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting
payment under this backstop agreement. Robins Kaplan LLP further certify that they are not
seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs
that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back -
Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Indivior Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to
be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the
California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop
Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment any state funds to
the City of Santa Ana, Robins Kaplan LLP, or any o er party.
/64 , 2025
varo Nunez, City
, 2025
By:
Robins Kaplan LLP
, 2025
ATTEST, �.�>, [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
1 0
Jennife Hall
lerk
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Mylan Settlement
1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Mylan Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision thereto
(the "Mylan Settlement Agreement"), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of California
proposes this agreement (the "CA Mylan Allocation Agreement") to govern the allocation,
distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections IV
and V of the Mylan Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not
apply to payments made pursuant to Section IX of the Mylan Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA
Mylan Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a
Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or
greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating
Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding
Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Mylan Settlement Agreement.
b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in
California. CA Litigating Special Districts include Susanville Elementary School
District and Lassen County Office of Education.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA
Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or
through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of
California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.
d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a
West -Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. ("Mylan"); Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co.,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS
Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc.,
Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna
Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer
D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies
related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any
state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, as well as
applicable law, and the Mylan Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of
this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement have
the same meaning as in the Mylan Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.
Pursuant to Section V(D)(1) of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund
payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the
Mylan Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund
payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.
This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California' pursuant to Section IX of the
Mylan Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees and the Additional
Remediation Amount.
4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Mylan Settlement Agreement, shall
be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15%
to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the
Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, and 15%
of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California Allocation"),
70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts Fund"), and 15% to
the California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund").
A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by
the State for future Opioid Remediation,
B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund. The fiends in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be
allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed
negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as
adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or
litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA
' For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of
California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of
California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
Or 'IN]
2 p _
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in
Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For
the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and
counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its
Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision,
and will receive payments as provided in the Mylan Settlement Agreement.
C) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating
Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its
share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a
AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the
"Distributors Settlement"), that city's Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to
the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the
Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change
in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment
Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to
be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the
county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance
with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in
accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct
payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share,
with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund
Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Mylan
Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and
Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating
Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund
that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund,
become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered
within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Mylan Settlement Agreement and
this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however,
that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA
Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must
be transferred to the State.
Div
Docusign Envelope ID; D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or
more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to
the Mylan Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA
Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will
be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities
within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program;
(2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD") treatment infrastructure;
(3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including
sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted
by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by
providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn)
and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability,
restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited
to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice -impacted youth, youth experiencing
adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or
(6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for
opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but
not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS
will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating
Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Mylan Settlement
Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private
sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement
Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for
Opioid Remediation consistent with the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan
Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to
reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among
themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being
reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds
must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may
regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Mylan Settlement Agreement
and this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement
Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Mylan Settlement Agreement or this CA Mylan
Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other
sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating
Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the
Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to
meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and
confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise
enforce the requirements of the Mylan Settlement Agreement or this CA Mylan
Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be
brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on
which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this
agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or
constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits,
investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal
enforcement actions.
C. CA Subdivision Fund
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the
Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used,
subject to any limits imposed by the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan
Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-
related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.
5 i
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision
Funds be used for litigation -related fees and expenses.
D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee
agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its
contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement
agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its
share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee counsel
("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Mylan Settlement
Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any
payments to contingency -fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such
Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision's total gross recovery under
this Mylan Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments
made under a State Back -Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid
Abatement use requirements under Section V(B)(1) of the Mylan Settlement Agreement. Before
seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private counsel
representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney
Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Mylan Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel
may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of
Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California
Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the
request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and
its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney
General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into
agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or
enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any
duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without
limitation the Attorney General.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the
settlement until those fiends are frilly expended and for one year thereafter. These reports
will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement
will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those
fiends are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a
certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the
settlement have been used in compliance with the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this
CA Mylan Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by
DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives
of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts
Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible
solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for
oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city
within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions'
expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will
be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision.
d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and
expenditures, as required by the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan
Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the
CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must
identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used,
including if used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to
Section V(B)(2) of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, such information must also be
reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Mylan.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to
discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the
State and Participating Subdivisions.
6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA
Mylan Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet
and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated
motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Mylan Settlement Agreement, this CA Mylan Allocation
Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
7 0
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable
by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this
agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of
such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this
agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d) Except as provided in the Mylan Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed
by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
The undersigned, Santa Ana city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California
State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds —Mylan Settlement
is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Mylan Settlement and ACCEPTS this
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds
— Mylan Settlement.
Signature: ¢s.
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: City of Santa Ana
Date: li12. r
Approved as to Form:
�awl a �
Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST: 9 M TA
1
Jennifer L. 11
City Clerk
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights,
releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and
Use of Settlement Funds—Mylan Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.
Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the
column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.13.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation
share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the
column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial
Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding
the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California
Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.13. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,"
the annotation of"100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent
(100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
e
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percents e
County
Alameda County
Alameda
2332%
2.853%
2.4237952%
city
Alameda
Alameda
0.069%
0.0570162%
City
Albany
Alameda
0.013%
0.0107768%
City
Berkeley
Alameda
0.152%
0.1249656%
city
Dublin
Alameda
0.033%
0.040%
0.0338810%
city
Emeryville
Alameda
0.023%
0.0185765%
city
Fremont
Alameda
0.108%
0.0888576%
city
Hayward
Alameda
0.117%
0.0966218%
city
Livermore
Alameda
0.054%
0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda
0.026%
0.0217626%
City
Oakland
Alameda
0.486%
0.595%
0.5055601%
city
Piedmont
Alameda
0.014%
0.0114064%
city
Pleasanton
Alameda
0.067%
0.0554547%
Citv
San Leandro
Alameda
0.039%
0.0321267%
Ci
Union City
Alameda
0.043%
0.0352484%
County
Amador County
Amador
0.226%
0.277%
0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte
1.615%
1.975%
1.6783178%
city
Chico
Butte
0.216%
0.264%
0.2246499%
city
Oroville
Butte
0.079%
0.0646595%
County
Calaveras County
Calaveras
0.226%
0.277%
0.2351644%
County
Colusa County
Colusa
0.059%
0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa
2.102%
2.571%
2.1844585%
city
Antioch
Contra Costa
0.037%
0.0301879%
city
Brentwood
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0215339%
city
Clayton
Contra Costa
0.002%
0.0018060%
city
Concord
Contra Costa
0.055%
0.0456676%
city
Danville
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0082255%
city
El Cerrito
Contra Costa
0.023%
0.0189024%
City
Hercules
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
Ci
Lafayette
Contra Costa
0.006%
0.0046030%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Martinez
Contra Costa
0.012%
0.0098593%
city
Mora a
Contra Costa
0.004%
0.0031007%
city
Oakley
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0079416%
city
Ori nda
Contra Costa
0.005%
0.0038157%
city
Pinole
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0110909%
city
PittsburgContra
Costa
0.053%
0.0436369%
City
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0106309%
city
Richmond
Contra Costa
0.146%
0.1201444%
city
San Pablo
Contra Costa
0.018%
0.0148843%
city
San Ramon
Contra Costa
0.021%
0.0176459%
city
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte
0.114%
0.140%
0.1189608%
County
El Dorado Couniy
El Dorado
0.768%
0.939%
0.7980034%
city
Placerville
El Dorado
0.015%
0.0127642%
city
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
0.081%
0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno
1.895%
2.318%
1.9693410%
city
Clovis
Fresno
0.065%
0.0536211%
city
Coalinga
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098554%
City
Fresno
Fresno
0.397%
0.3270605%
city
Kerman
Fresno
0.005%
0.0042534%
city
Kingsburg
Fresno
0.008%
0.0066167%
City
Mendota
Fresno
0.002%
0.0019387%
city
Orange Cove
Fresno
0.004%
0.0035607%
city
Parlier
Fresno
0.008%
0.0069755%
city
Reedley
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098804%
city
Sanger
Fresno
0.018%
0.0146135%
city
Selma
Fresno
0.015%
0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn
0.107%
0.131%
0.1116978%
Count
Humboldt County
Humboldt
1.030%
1.260%
1.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Arcata
Humboldt
0.054%
0.0447660%
city
Eureka
Humboldt
0.117%
0.143%
0.1216284%
city
Fortuna
Humboldt
0.032%
0.0266837%
County
Imperial County
Imperial
0.258%
0.315%
0.2679006%
city
Brawley
Imperial
0.011%
0.0087986%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
city
Calexico
Imperial
0.019%
0.0152799%
city
El Centro
Imperial
0.158%
0.1302522%
city
Imperial
Imperial
0.006%
0.0048791%
County
Ingo Couno�
In o
0.073%
0.089%
0.0754413%
County
Kern County
Kern
2.517%
3.079%
2.6159145%
city
Arvin
Kern
0.0060o
0.0046425%
City
Bakersfield
Kern
0.212%
0.1747198%
city
California City
Kern
0.009%
0.0070820%
city
Delano
Kern
0.030%
0.0249316%
city
McFarland
Kern
0.003%
0.0025644%
City
Rid ecrest
Kern
0.015%
0.0120938%
city
Shafter
Kern
0.013%
0.0103417%
city
Tehachapi
Kern
0.009%
0.0073580%
city
wasco
Kern
0.008%
0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings
0.293%
0.2413469%
city
Avenal
Kings
0.007%
0.0056335%
city
Corcoran
Kings
0.013%
0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings
0.027%
0.0226038%
city
Lemoore
Kings
0.016%
0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake
0.795%
0.6545389%
city
Clearlake
Lake
0.041%
0.050%
0.0426253%
city
Lakeport
Lake
0.021%
0.026%
0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen
0.319%
0.391%
0.3320610%
city
Susanville
Lassen
0.027%
0.0219295%
Cotm
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles
13.896%
16.999%
14.4437559%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040024%
City
Alhambra
Los Angeles
0.042%
0.0343309%
city
Arcadia
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0267718%
city
Artesia
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0005100%
City
Azusa
Los Angeles
0.026%
0.0210857%
city
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
0.027%
0.0218520%
city
Bell
Los Angeles
0.008%
0.0068783%
city
Bellflower
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0014485%
City
Bell Gardens
Los Angeles
0.014%
0.0114301%
W❑ .
vim.
o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles
0.065%
0.0534897%
City
Burbank
Los Angeles
0.100%
0.0823132%
City
Calabasas
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048948%
City
Carson
Los Angeles-
0.019%
0.0159805%
city
Cerritos
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039682%
city
Claremont
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0082584%
city
Commerce
Los Angeles
0.000%
0.0002971%
City
Compton
Los Angeles
0.044%
0.0361882%
City
Covina
Los Angeles
0.028%
0.0229127%
City
Cudahy
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006020%
City
Culver City
Los Angeles
0.055%
0.0449894%
City
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006993%
city
Downey
Los Angeles
0.052%
0.0429994%
city
Duarte
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0027261%
City
El Monte
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.038%
0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0268020%
City
Gardena
Los Angeles
0.034%
0.0278088%
city
Glendale
Los Angeles
0.166%
0.1366586%
city
Glendora
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134411%
city
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040549%
City
Hawthorne
Los Angeles
0.050%
0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
e percentag
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0145307%
City
Huntington Park
Los Angeles
0.023%
0.0190667%
City
Inglewood
Los Angeles
0.059%
0.0489195%
city
La Canada Flintrid e
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0025565%
City
Lakewood
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039971 %
city
La Mirada
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0081572%
city
Lancaster
Los Angeles
0.045%
0.0369689%
City
La Puente
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012999%
City
La Verne
Los Angeles
0.024%
0.0194190%
City
Lawndale
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0017731%
city
Lomita
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0031940%
city
Long Beach
Los Angeles
0.439%
0.3614151%
City
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
2.715%
3.321%
2.8218811 %
o
4of
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1785-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134345%
city
Malibu
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0019269%
City
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260686%
City
Maywood
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0035528%
City
Monrovia
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0254455%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles
0.030%
0.0250670%
City
Monterey Park
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0256677%
city
Norwalk
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0258228%
city
Palmdale
Los Angeles
0.046%
0.0375827%
City
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles
0.011%
0.0091483%
City
Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.146%
0.1200524%
City
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles
0.111%
0.0911933%
city
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012645%
City
Redondo Beach
Los An eles
0.062%
0.0506992%
City
Rosemead
Los An eles
0.003%
0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
p g
County
�
Abatement
Percentage
g
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
San Dimas
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0022016%
City
San Fernando
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0104837%
city
San Gabriel
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0147726%
City
San Marino
Los Angeles
0.009%
0.0073791%
city
Santa Clarita
Los An eles
0.022%
0.0178167%
city
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles
0.158%
0.1298513%
city
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048646%
City
Signal Hill
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0084884%
city
South El Monte
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039603%
city
South Gate
Los Angeles
0.020%
0.0166272%
city
South Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.012%
0.0095334%
City
Temple City
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles
0.112%
0.0919820%
City
Walnut
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0047305%
City
West Covina
Los Angeles
0.049%
0.0404521%
City
West Hollywood
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0108517%
O
Sof tj
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
City
Whittier
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260581 %
County
Madera Connty
Madera
0.349%
0.427%
0.3630669%
city
Chowchilla
Madera
0.012%
0.0097332%
Citv
Madera
Madera
0.039%
0.0318441%
County
Morin County
Marin
0.564%
0.690%
0.5861325%
City
Larkspur
Marin
0.015%
0.0124697%
City
Mill Valley
Marin
0.020%
0.0168401%
city
Novato
Marin
0.028%
0.0229824%
City
San Anselmo
Marin
0.009%
0.0078062%
city
San Rafael
Marin
0.089%
0.0729823%
County
Mariposa County
Mariposa
0.084%
0.103%
0.0876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino
0.439%
0.536%
0.4558394%
City
Ukiah
Mendocino
0.039%
0.0317153%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
e
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County
Merced Coun
Merced
0.551%
0.674%
0.5724262%
city
Arivater
Merced
0.024%
0.0195846%
City
Livingston
Merced
0.006%
0.0045873%
City
Los Banos
Merced
0.020%
0.0165142%
city
Merced
Merced
0.061%
0.0500762%
County
Modoc County
Modoc
0.065%
0.080%
0.0678250%
County
Mono County
Mono
0.023%
0.029%
0.0242606%
County
Monterey County
Monterey
0.908%
1.111%
0.9437083%
city
Greenfield
Monterey
0.006%
0.0050552%
city
King City
Monterey
0.005%
0.0037355%
city
Marina
Monterey
0.017%
0.0144098%
City
Monterey
Monterey
0.041%
0.0336540%
city
Pacific Grove
Monterey
0.009%
0.0074842%
city
Salinas
Monterey
0.094%
0.0776576%
City
Seaside
Monterey
0.023%
0.0191772%
city
Soledad
Monterey
0.007%
0.0060870%
County
Napa County
Napa
0.288%
0.352%
0.2954325%
city
American Canyon
Napa
0.017%
0.0136869%
city
Napa
Napa
0.078%
0.0642783%
County
Nevada County
Nevada
0.441%
0.539%
0.4579827%
cityy
Grass Valle
Nevada
0.024%
0.0197805%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Truckee
Nevada
0.003%
0.0023843%
County
Orange County
Orange
4.364%
5.339%
4.5363576%
Ci
Aliso Vie'o
Orange
0.014%
0.0113841%
city
Anaheim
Oran e
0.554%
0.678%
0.5759282%
Ci
Brea
Orange
0.086%
0.0708897%
city
Buena Park
Oran e
0.087%
1
0.0714352%
city
Costa Mesa
Oran e
0.124%°
0.152%
0.1288366%
city
Cypress
Orange
0.033%
0.0271937%
City
Dana Point
Orange
0.001%
0.0005560%
Parhe�gatmg
Subdrvis�on '
..Cla iticitiou
Pancdpatwg Subdmsion
County
Abatement
Percentage
-
Plawtdi -
Subdry�sion
Petcenta e':
Weighted `
Allcahon
„Percents as:
city
Fountain Valley
Orange
0.055%
0.0455980%
CL
Fullerton
Oran e
0.137%
0.168%
0.1425744%
city
Garden Grove
Oran e
0.213%
1
0.1752482%
city
Huntington Beach
Oran e
0.247%
0.302%
0.2568420%
CiLy
Irvine
Orange
0.139%
0.170%
0.1442350%
Ci
La una Beach
Orange
0.047%
0.058%
0.0493043%
City
Laguna Hills
Oran e
0.014%
0.0115457%
city
Laguna Niauel
Orange
0.001%
0.0007071%
CL
Laguna Woods
Orange
0.001%
0.0006546%
city
La Habra
Orange
0.060%
0.073%
0.0621049%
city
Lake Forest
Oran e
0.012%
0.0101249%
Ci
La Palma
Orange
0.012%
0.0095439%
city
Los Alamitos
Orange
0.008%
0.0069190%
CL
Mission Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0117560%
city
Newport Beach
Orange
0.179%
0.1470134%
Ci
Orange
Oran e
0,150%
0.1231320%
Ci
Placentia
Orange
0.029%
0.035%
0.0298912%
city
Rancho Santa Margarita
Orange
0.001%
0.0006296%
Ci
San Clemente
Orange
0.008%
0.010%
0,0086083%
city
San Juan Capistrano
Orange
0.008%
0.0065510%
city
Santa Ana
Orange
0,502%
0,614%
0.5213866%
Ci
Seal Beach
Orange
0.020%
0.0165891%
city
Stanton
Orange
0.035%
0.0291955%
city
Tustin
Oran e
0.073%
1
0.0600341%
city
Westminster
Orange 1
0.104%
0.127%
0.108272194.
M. dAl o
7of p V
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Xorba Linda
Orange
0.044%
0,0362223%
County
Placer County
Placer
1.045%
1.278%
1.0861002%
city
Auburn
Placer
0.017%
0.0141114%
city
Lincoln
Placer
0.031%
0,0255599%
City
Rocklin
Placer
0.076%
0.0625485%
Partxc�pakm�_
$ubdiyision.
Classxfleatibrif- `"
Pancd ahn Subdivision,
P g
Coun `
tY
Abatement
Percentage
P10111tili
SnbdivLsion ;
Pereenta a
Weighted
Allc`ahon
Percents a .;
city
Roseville
Placer
0.196%
0.1616559%
County
Plumas County
Plumas
0.205%
0.251%
0.2128729%
Coun
Riverside County
.Riverside
4.534%
5.547%
4.7128296%
city
Banning
Riverside
0.017%
0.0143848%
city
Beaumont
Riverside
0.021%
0.0171135%
city
Blythe
Riverside
0.012%
0,0096714%
Ci
Canyon Lake
Riverside
0.000%
0.0001761%
City
Cathedral Ci
Riverside
0.067%
0.0553614%
Ci
Coachella
Riverside
0.021%
0,0173054%
Ci
Corona
Riverside
0,147%
0.1207083%
Ci
Desert Hot S rin s
Riverside
0.024%
0.0200433%.
Ci
Eastvale
Riverside
0.000%
0.0002747%
Cill
Hemet
Riverside
0.051%
0.0421792%
Ci
Indio
Riverside
0.056%
0.0457794%
CiL,
Juru a Vallej
Riverside
0.001%
0.0008991%
Ci
Lake Elsinore
Riverside
0.021%
0.0172949%
city
La 2uinta
Riverside
0,063%
0.0516732%
city
Menifee
Riverside
0,032%
0.0260909%0
Ci
Moreno VallcL
Riverside
0.137%
0.1130348%
Ci
Murrieta
Riverside
0.048%
0.059%
0.0497423%
city
Norco
Riverside
0.01.6%
0.0134542%
Ci
Palm Desert
Riverside
0,083%
0.0682465%
city
Palm Springs
Riverside
0,076%
0.0629862%
Ci
Perris
Riverside
0.009%
0.0076774%
city
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
0,052%
0.0431098%
Ci
Riverside
Riverside
0.268%
0.2206279%
city
San Jacinto
Riverside
0.010%
0.0085936%
city
Temecula
Riverside
0.022%
0.0180086%
city
Wildomar
Riverside
0.008%
0.0062500%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Coun ,
Sacramento County
Sacramento
3.797%
4.645%
3.9465887%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta e
cityCitrus
Heights
Sacramento
0.057%
0.0465312%
cityElk
Grove
Sacramento
0.130%
0.1066994%
City
Folsom
Sacramento
0.108%
0.0890850%
City
Galt
Sacramento
0.017%
0.0143704%
city
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento
0.008%
0.0067679%
city
Sacramento
Sacramento
0.721%
0.882%
0.7496530%
Count),
San Benito County
San Benito
0.106%
0.130%
0.1101417%
city
Hollister
San Benito
0.027%
0.022535.5%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino
3.259%
3.987%
3.3878124%
city
Adelanto
San Bernardino
0.008%
0.0066640%
City
Apple Valley
San Bernardino
0.025%
0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino
0.015%
0.0122056%
City
Chino
San Berardino
0.064%
0.0525893%
city
Chino Hills
San Bernardino
0.001%
0.0006388%
City
Colton
San Bernardino
0.031%
0.0253443%
city
Fontana
San Bernardino
0.112%
0.0920543%
City
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino
0.006%
0.00.51051%
City
Hesperia
San Bernardino
0.035%
0.0291522%
city
Highland
San Bernardino
0.004%
0.0029061%
City
Loma Linda
San Bernardino
0.009%
0.0071188%
city
Montclair
San Bernardino
0.039%
0.0322108%
city
Ontario
San Bernardino
0.179%
0.1472934%
city
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino
0.084%
0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San Bernardino
0.057%
0.0469150%
city
Rialto
San Bernardino
0.073%
0.0603206%
city
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
0.178%
0.1461880%
City
Twent nine Palms
San Bernardino
0.002%
0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino
0.052%
0.0424460%
city
Victorville
San Bernardino
0.033%
0.0269400%
City
Yucaipa
San Bernardino
0.016%
0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
O
9of �.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1785-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino
0.003%
0.0021228%
County
San Diego County
San Diego
5.706%
6.980%
5.9309748%
city
Carlsbad
San Diego
0.128%
0.1050485%
city
Chula Vista
San Diego
0.189%
0.231%
0.1991456%
City
Coronado
San Diego
0.044%
0.0359095%
city
El Cajon
San Diego
0.113%
0.0933582%
City
Encinitas
San Diego
0.061%
0.074%
0.0630289%
City
Escondido
San Diego
0.145%
0.1192204%
City
Imperial Beach
San Diego
0.014%
0.0118283%
City
La Mesa
San Diego
0.055%
0.068%
0.0575593%
City
Lemon Grove
San Diego
0.022%
0.0183911%
City
National City
San Diego
0.080%
0.0656808%
City
Oceanside
San Diego
0.213%
0.1753428%
City
Poway
San Diego
0.062%
0.0511040%
city
San Diego
San Diego
1.975%
2.416%
2.0531169%
City
San Marcos
San Diego
0.089%
0.0733897%
City
Santee
San Diego
0.033%
0.0268401%
city
Solana Beach
San Diego
0.017%
0. 1138564%
City
Vista
San Die o
0.052%
0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco
3.026%
3.702%
3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin County
San Joaquin
1.680%
2.055%
1.7460399%
city
Lathrop
San Joaquin
0.009%
0.0075394%
cityLodi
San Joaquin
0.053
0.0439484%
cityManteca
San Joaquin
0.054
0.0443454%
CityRipon
San Joaquin
0.013%
0.0104219%
Stockton
San Joaquin
%Ci
0.31
0.383%
0.3256176%
city
Tracy
San Joaquin
0.084%
0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo
0.816%
0.999%
0.8484126%
City
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obispo
0.024%
0.0199053%
City
Atascadero
San Luis Obispo
0.029%
0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plamhff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo
0.043%
0.0353456%
City
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo
0.017%
0.0137881%
city
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo
0.020%
0.0160922%
city
San Luis Obispo I
San Luis Obispo
0.077%
0.0637841%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
San Mateo County
San Mateo
1.074%
1.313%
1.1159599%
City
Belmont
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0169860%
City
Burlingame
San Mateo
0.019%
0.0152537%
city
Daly City
San Mateo
0.044%
0.0363880%
City
East Palo Alto
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0103982%
City
Foster City
San Mateo
0.020%
0.0166101%
City
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo
0.004%
0.0031638%
city
Hillsborough
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0110029%
City
Menlo Park
San Mateo
0.015%
0.0126209%
City
Millbrae
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0105836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo
0.016%
0.0130625%
city
Redwood City
San Mateo
0.056%
0.0463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0172161%
City
San Carlos
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0108885%
city
San Mateo
San Mateo
0.052%
0.0425841%
city
South San Francisco
San Mateo
0.043%
0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara County
Santa Barbara
1.132%
1.385%
1.1768968%
City
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara
0.001%
0.0008938%
city
Goleta
Santa Barbara
0.004%
0.00289697
city
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
0.047%
0.0389379%
city
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
0.122%
0.1004559%
city
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara
0.058%
0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara
2.404%
2.941%
2.4987553%
City
Campbell
Santa Clara
0.014%
0.0112566%
city
Cupertino
Santa Clara
0.008%
0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara
0.025%
0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
e Percentag
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Los Altos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103338%
City
Los Gatos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103220%
city
Milpitas
Santa Clara
0.036%
0.0298120%
city
Morgan Hill
Santa Clara
0.015%
0.0124619%
city
Mountain View
Santa Clara
0.041%
0.0334608%
city
Palo Alto
Santa Clara
0.039%
0.0323080%
city
San Jose
Santa Clara
0.294%
0.360%
0.3054960%
city_Santa
Clara
Santa Clara
0.067%
0.0549723%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
city
Saratoga
Santa Clara
0.004%
0.0034161%
city
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara
0.053%
0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz
0.783%
0.957%
0.8135396%
city
Ca itola
Santa Cruz
0.020%
0.0168191%
city
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
0.143%
0.1180348%
city
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz
0.015%
0.0126525%
City
Watsonville
Santa Cruz
0.063%
0.0520136%
County
Shasta County
Shasta
1.095%
1.339%
1.1380191%
City
Anderson
Shasta
0.024%
0.0198896%
city
Redding
Shasta
0.284%
0.2334841%
City
Shasta Lake
Shasta
0.004%
0.0031993%
County
Siski ou County
Siski ou
0.228%
0.279%
0.2373393%
County
Solano County
Solano
0.760%
0.6260795%
city
Benicia
Solano
0.031%
0.0253903%
city
Dixon
Solano
0.016%
0.0130849%
City
Fairfield
Solano
0.109%
0.0897317%
city
Suisun City
Solano
0.021%
0.0176183%
city
Vacaville
Solano
0.119%
0.0976497%
city
Vallejo
Solano
0.167%
0.1373644%
County
Sonoma County
Sonoma
1.218%
1.490%
1.2661290%
city
Healdsburg
Sonoma
0.032%
0.0266929%
city
Petaluma
Sonoma
0.081%
0.0667507%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Alleation
Percentage
city
Rohnert Park
Sonoma
0.041%
0.03407.59%
City
Santa Rosa
Sonoma
0.184%
0.1519070%
city
Sonoma
Sonoma
0.022%
0.0183438%
city
Windsor
Sonoma
0.016%
0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus
1.722%
1.4182273%
city
Ceres
Stanislaus
0.041%
0.0340260%
city
Modesto I
Stanislaus
0.217%
0.1788759%
City
Newman
Stanislaus
0.006%
0.0046964%
City
Oakdale
Stanislaus
0.018%
0.0145531%
city
Patterson
Stanislaus
0.015%
0.0126590%
city
Riverbank
Stanislaus
0.010%
0.0085699%
city
Turlock
Stanislaus
0.065%
0.0531966%
❑f ❑
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sutter County
Sutter
0.306%
0.374%
0.3179548%
City
Yuba City
Sutter
0.074%
0.0606242%
County
Tehanra Coun
Tehama
0.213%
0.261%
0.2216654%
city
Red Bluff
Teharna
0.014%
0.0117771%
County
Trinity County
Trinity
0.082%
0.101%
0.0855476%
County
Tulare County
Tulare
0.809%
0.990%
0.8410949%
City
Dinuba
Tulare
0.014%
0.0116929%
city
Exeter
Tulare
0.004%
0.0032479%
city
Farmersville
Tulare
0.003%
0.0027879%
City
Lindsay
Tulare
0.007%
0.0057111%
City
Porterville
Tulare
0.021%
0.0171845%
City
Tulare
Tulare
0.037%
0.0302273%
city
Visalia
Tulare
0.066%
0.0545872%
CoLmty
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne
0.486%
0.594%
0.5047621%
County
Ventura Countj,
Ventura
2.192%
2.681%
2.2781201%
City
Camarillo
Ventura
0.002%
0.0012815%
city
Fillmore
Ventura
0.002%
0.0020294%
City
Moorpark
Ventura
0.008%
0.0067337%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
AHcation
Percentage
city
Oxnard
Ventura
0.156%
0.190%
0.1617338%
city
Port Hueneme
Ventura
0.021%
0.0174145%
city
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura
0.085%
0.0702181%
city
Santa Paula
Ventura
0.014%
0.0119072%
city
Simi Valley
Ventura
0.065%
0.0533043%
city
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
0.022%
0.0179902%
County
Y010 County
Yolo
0.357%
0.437%
0.3713319%
city
Davis
Yolo
0.055%
0.0451747%
City
West Sacramento
Yolo
0.066%
0.0544321%
city
Woodland
Yolo
0.058%
0.0477904%
County
Yuba County
Yuba
0.214%
0.2627
0.2225679%
city
Marysville
Yuba
0.014% 1
1
0.0112079%
13c 0.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
issued an Order (the Order, docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate
Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political
subdivisions eligible to participate in the Mylan Settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of the City of Santa Ana, the City of Santa Ana, its
counsel Robins Kaplan LLP, and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of
California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop
Agreement).
The City of Santa Ana and Robins Kaplan LLP intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a
State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on
Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Mylan Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, the City of Santa Ana may, subject to the limitations of the
Mylan Settlement Agreement and CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, as well as any other
limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Mylan Settlement CA Subdivision
Fund to pay a contingent fee to Robins Kaplan LLP. Any such payment from the City of Santa
Ana to Robins Kaplan from the City of Santa Ana's CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not
exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of
the City of Santa Ana's 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such
payments, together with any contingency -fees that Robins Kaplan may receive from the Attorney
Fee Fund will not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross recovery of the City of
Santa Ana from the Mylan Settlement Agreement.
Robins Kaplan LLP certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund
created under the Mylan Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this
backstop agreement. Robins Kaplan LLP further certify that they are not seeking and will not
accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back -
Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Mylan Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to
be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the
California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop
Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not r uire the payme any state funds to
the C' /_of Santa Ana, Robins Kaplan LLP, o any er party.
e! , 2025 X4.,
Alvaro Nunez, City Manager
, 2025
, 2025
ATTEST„ 9ANT1
Jennifer L all
r
By:
Robins Kaplan LLP
[ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK] 0
1
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Sun Settlement
1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Sun Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision thereto
(the "Sun Settlement Agreement"), including Section VI and Exhibit O, the State of California
proposes this agreement (the "CA Sun Allocation Agreement") to govern the allocation,
distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections V and
VI of the Sun Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply
to payments made pursuant to Section X of the Sun Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Sun Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Sun
Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a
Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or
greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating
Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding
Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Sun Settlement Agreement.
b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in
California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA
Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or
through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of
California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.
d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a
West -Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. ("Mylan"); Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co.,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS
Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc.,
Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna
Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer
D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies
related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any
state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Sun Settlement Agreement, as well as
applicable law, and the Sun Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of
this CA Sun Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Sun Allocation Agreement have the
same meaning as in the Sun Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.
Pursuant to Section VI(D)(1) of the Sun Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments
will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VI(B)(2) of the Sun
Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment
amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.
This Agreement does not apply to fiends received by California' pursuant to Section X of the Sun
Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees and the Additional
Remediation Amount.
4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Sun Settlement Agreement, shall be
allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to
the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the
Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Sun Allocation Agreement, and 15% of
that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California Allocation"), 70%
to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts Fund"), and 15% to the
California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund").
A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by
the State for future Opioid Remediation.
B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be
allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed
negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as
adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or
litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in
' For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of
California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of
California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
2
Docusign Envelope ID: D1 EF72EC-1 7B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFB0E5C
Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For
the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and
counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its
Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision,
and will receive payments as provided in the Sun Settlement Agreement.
C) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating
Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its
share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a.
AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the
"Distributors Settlement"), that city's Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to
the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the
Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change
in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment
Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to
be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the
county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance
with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in
accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct
payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share,
with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund
Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Sun
Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and
Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating
Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund
that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund,
become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered
within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Sun Settlement Agreement and
this CA Sun Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however,
that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA
Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must
be transferred to the State.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or
more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to
the Sun Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA
Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will
be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities
within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program;
(2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD") treatment infrastructure;
(3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including
sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted
by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by
providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn)
and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability,
restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited
to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice -impacted youth, youth experiencing
adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or
(6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for
opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but
not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS
will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating
Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Sun Settlement
Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private
sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement
Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for
Opioid Remediation consistent with the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun
Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to
reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among
themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being
reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement fiends
must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may
regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Sun Settlement Agreement and
this CA Sun Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement
Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Sun Settlement Agreement or this CA Sun
Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other
sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating
Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the
Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to
meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and
confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise
enforce the requirements of the Sun Settlement Agreement or this CA Sun Allocation
Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as
to a specific expenditure of fiends, more than five years after the date on which the
expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or
constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits,
investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal
enforcement actions.
C. CA Subdivision Fund
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the
Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used,
subject to any limits imposed by the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun
Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-
related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.
Docusign Envelope ID; D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision
Funds be used for litigation -related fees and expenses.
D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee
agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its
contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement
agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its
share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee
counsel ("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(Y), of the Sun
Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with
any payments to contingency -fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such
Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision's total gross recovery under
this Sun Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments
made under a State Back -Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid
Abatement use requirements under Section VI(B)(1) of the Sun Settlement Agreement. Before
seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private counsel
representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney
Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Sun Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel
may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of
Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California
Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the
request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and
its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney
General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into
agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or
enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any
duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without
limitation the Attorney General.
N
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the
settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports
will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement
will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those
fiends are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a
certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the
settlement have been used in compliance with the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA
Sun Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by
DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives
of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts
Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible
solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for
oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city
within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions'
expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will
be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision.
d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and
expenditures, as required by the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun Allocation
Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA
Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify
and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if
used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section
VI(B)(2) of the Sun Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the
Settlement Fund Administrator and Sun.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to
discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the
State and Participating Subdivisions.
6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA
Sun Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and
confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion
or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Sun Settlement Agreement, this CA Sun Allocation Agreement
is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
0} 0
7
Docusign Envelope ID; D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable
by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Sun Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this
agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of
such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this
agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d) Except as provided in the Sun Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed
by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
The undersigned, Santa Ana city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California
State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds —Sun Settlement is
a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Sun Settlement and ACCEPTS this
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of S ement Funds
—Sun Settlement.
Signature:
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: City Manager
Date: �'94' /" ,
r 2-
Approved as to Form:
o vna �
Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
n fr roc r.
Q
Mi
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights,
releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and
Use of Settlement Funds —Sun Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.
Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the
column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.13.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation
share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the
column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial
Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding
the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California
Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.13. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,"
the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of"100%" refers to one -hundred percent
(100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta e
CountyAlameda
County
Alameda
2.332%
2.853%
2.4237952%
cityAlameda
Alameda
0.069%
0.0570162%
cityy
Alban
Alameda
0.013%
0.0107768%
City
Berkeley
Alameda
0.152%
0.1249656%
city
Dublin
Alameda
0.033%
0.040%
0.0338810%
City
Emeryville
Alameda
0.023%
0.0185765%
city
Fremont
Alameda
0.108%
0.0888576%
city
Hayward
Alameda
0.117%
0.0966218%
city
Livermore
Alameda
0.054%
0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda
0.026%
0.0217626%
city
Oakland
Alameda
0.486%
0.595%
0.5055601%
city
Piedmont
Alameda
0.014%
0.0114064%
city
Pleasanton
Alameda
0.067%
0.0554547%
city
San Leandro
Alameda
0.039%
0.0321267%
City
Union City
Alameda
0.043%
0.0352484%
County
Amador County
Amador
0.226%
0.277%
0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte
1.615%
1.975%
1.6783178%
city
Chico
Butte
0.216%
0.264%
0.2246499%
city
Oroville
Butte
0.079%
0.0646595%
County
Calaveras Couno
Calaveras
0.226%
0.277%
0.2351644%
County
Colusa County
Colusa
0.059%
0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa
2.102%
2.571%
2.1844585%
city
Antioch
Contra Costa
0.037%
0.0301879%
city
Brentwood
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0215339%
city
Clayton
Contra Costa
0.002%
0.0018060%
City
Concord
Contra Costa
0.055%
0.0456676%
city
Danville
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0082255%
city
El Cerrito
Contra Costa
0.023%
0.0189024%
city
Hercules
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta e
cityLafayette
Contra Costa
0.006%
0.0046030%
.yt ,
I • o ei_.,o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Martinez
Contra Costa
0.012%
0.0098593%
city
Mora a
Contra Costa
0.004%
0.0031007%
city
Oakley
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0079416%
city
Orinda
Contra Costa
0.005%
0.0038157%
city
Pinole
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0110909%
city
PittsburgContra
Costa
0.053%
0.0436369%
city
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0106309%
city
Richmond
Contra Costa
0.146%
0.1201444%
city
San Pablo
Contra Costa
0.018%
0.0148843%
City
San Ramon
Contra Costa
0.021%
0.0176459%
city
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte
0.114%
0.140%
0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado
0.768%
0.939%
0.7980034%
city
Placerville
El Dorado
0.015%
0.0127642%
city
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
0.081%
0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno
1.895%
2.318%
1.9693410%
city
Clovis
Fresno
0.065%
0.0536211%
city
Coalinga
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098554%
city
Fresno
Fresno
0.397%
0.3270605%
city
Kerman
Fresno
0.005%
0.0042534%
city
Kingsburg
Fresno
0.008%
0.0066167%
city
Mendota
Fresno
0.002%
0.0019387%
city
Orange Cove
Fresno
0.004%
0.0035607%
city
Parlier
Fresno
0.008%
0.0069755%
city
Reedle y
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098804%
city
Sanger
Fresno
0.018%
0.0146135%
city
Selma
Fresno
0.015%
0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn
0.107%
0.131%
0.1116978%
County
Humboldt County
Humboldt
1.030%
1.260%
1.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Arcata
Humboldt
0.054%
0.0447660%
city
Eureka
Humboldt
0.117%
0.143%
0.1216284%
city
Fortuna
Humboldt
0.032%
0.0266837%
County
Imperial Coun
Imperial
0.258%
0.315%
0.2679006%
city
Brawley
Imperial
0.011%
0.0087986%
o :o
2of p. 2,
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Calexico
Imperial
0.019%
0.0152799%
city
El Centro
Imperial
0.158%
0.1302522%
city
Imperial
Imperial
0.006%
0.0048791%
County
Inyo County
In o
0.073%
0.089%
0.0754413%
County
Kern County
Kern
2.517%
3.079%
2.6159145%
City
Arvin
Kern
0.00606
0.0046425%
city
Bakersfield
Kern
0.212%
0.1747198%
city
California City
Kern
0.009%
0.0070820%
City
Delano
Kern
0.030%
0.0249316%
city
McFarland
Kern
0.003%
0.0025644%
city
Rid ecrest
Kern
0.015%
0.0120938%
city
Shaper
Kern
0.013%
0.0103417%
city
Tehachapi
Kern
0.009%
0.0073580%
city
Wasco
Kern
0.008%
0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings
0.293%
0.2413469%
city
Avenal
Kings
0.007%
0.0056335%
city
Corcoran
Kings
0.013%
0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings
0.027%
0.0226038%
city
Lemoore
Kings
0.016%
0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake
0.795%
0.6545389%
city
Clearlake
Lake
0.041%
0.050%
0.0426253%
city
Lakeport
Lake
0.021%
0.026%
0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen
0.319%
0.391%
0.3320610%
city
Susanville
Lassen
0.027%
0.0219295%
County
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles
13.896%
16.999%
14.4437559%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percenta a
Weighted
Alkation
Percentage
city
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040024%
city
Alhambra
Los Angeles
0.042%
0.0343309%
city
Arcadia
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0267718%
city
Artesia
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0005100%
city
Azusa
Los Angeles
0.026%
0.0210857%
city
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
0.027%
0.0218520%
City
Bell
Los Angeles
0.008%
0.0068783%
city
Bellflower
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0014485%
City
Bell Gardens
Los Angeles
0.014%
0.0114301%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles
0.065%
0.0534897%
city
Burbank
Los Angeles
0.100%
0.0823132%
City
Calabasas
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048948%
City
Carson
Los An eles
0.019%
0.0159805%
city
Cerritos
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039682%
City
Claremont
Los Angeles
0.01000
0.0082584%
City
Commerce
Los Angeles
0.000%
0.0002971%
city
Compton
Los Angeles
0.044%
0.0361882%
City
Covina
Los Angeles
0.028%
0.0229127%
City
Cudahy
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006020%
City
Culver City
Los Angeles
0.055%
0.0449894%
City
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006993%
city
Downey
Los Angeles
0.052%
0.0429994%
city
Duarte
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0027261%
City
El Monte
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.038%
0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0268020%
City
Gardena
Los Angeles
0.034%
0.0278088%
city
Glendale
Los Angeles
0.166%
0.1366586%
city
Glendora
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134411%
city
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040549%
City
Hawthorne
Los Angeles
0.050%
0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percenta a
weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0145307%
City
Huntington Park
Los Angeles
0.023%
0.0190667%
city
Inglewood
Los Angeles
0.059%
0.0489195%
city
La Canada Flintrid e
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0025565%
city
Lakewood
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039971%
city
La Mirada
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0081572%
city
Lancaster
Los Angeles
0.045%
0.0369689%
city
La Puente
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012999%
City
La Verne
Los Angeles
0.024%
0.0194190%
City
Lawndale
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0017731%
city
Lomita
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0031940%
city
Loner Beach
Los Angeles
0.439%
0.3614151%
City
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
2.715%
3.321%
2.8218811 %
01
t
4r
4of O'.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX 1
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134345%
City
Malibu
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0019269%
city
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260686%
city
Maywood
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0035528%
city
Monrovia
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0254455%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles
0.030%
0.0250670%
City
Monterey Park
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0256677%
city
Norwalk
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0258228%
city
Palmdale
Los Angeles
0.046%
0.0375827%
city
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles
0.011%
0.0091483%
city
Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.146%
0.1200524%
City
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles
0.111%
0.0911933%
city
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012645%
city
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
0.062%
0.0506992%
City
Rosemead
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
San Dimas
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0022016%
City
San Fernando
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0104837%
city
San Gabriel
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0147726%
city
San Marino
Los Angeles
0.009%
0.0073791%
city
Santa Clarita
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0178167%
City
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles
0.158%
0.1298513%
City
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048646%
City
Signal Hill
Los Angeles
0.01077
0.0084884%
City
South El Monte
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039603%
City
South Gate
Los Angeles
0.020%
o.o166272%
City
South Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.012%
0.0095334%
city
Temple City
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles
0.112%
0.0919820%
city
Walnut
Los Angeles
0.0060%,/.
0.0047305%
cityWest
Covina
Los Angeles
0.049%
0.0404521%
cityWest
Hollywood
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0108517%
5of p
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Whittier
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260581%
Coun
Madera County
Madera
0,349%
0.427%
0.3630669%
Ci
Chowchilla
Madera
0.012%
0.0097332%
city
Madera
Madera
0.039%
0.0318441%
Coun
Marin Coun2
Marin
0.564%
0.690%
0.5861325%
city
Larkspur
Marin
0.015%
0.0124697%
Cit
Mill Valley
Marin
0.020%e
0.0168401%
city
Novato
Marin
0.028%
0.0229824%
city
San Anselmo
Marin
0.009%
0.0078062%
city
San Rafael
Marin
0,089%
0,0729823%
County
Mari osa CounLp
Mariposa
0.084%
0.103%
0.0876131%
County
Mendocino CounLy
Mendocino
0.439%
0.536%
0.4.558394%
city
Ukiah
Mendocino
0.039%
0.0317153%
Pa�tge�patmg
�U�Jd1V/$14n :
-
Claffis�fiioatlon=
Participating Su6drvis►on ":
County
Abatement
,-_Percenta'e
Pla�ntdi ±
Subdry�sion �,
-
Peccenta e'
Weighted
Allcation
Percents e -
Coun!Z
Merced Coun2
Merced
0.551%
0.674%
0.5724262%
Ci
Atwater
Merced
0,024%
0.0195846%
city
Livingston
Merced
0.006%
0.0045873%
Ci
Los Banos
Merced
0,020%
0.0165142%
CiLy
Merced
Merced
0.061%
0,0500762%
County
ModocCounty
Modoc
0.065%
0.080%
0.0678250%
Coun
Mono County
Mono
0.023%
0.029%
0.0242606%
County
Montere CounLv
Monterey
0.908%
1.111%
0.9437083%
Ci!j
Greenfield
Monterey
0.006%
0.0050552%
Ci
Kina City
Monterey
0.005%
0.0037355%
city
Marina
Monterey
0.017%
0.0144098%
city
Monterey
Monterey
0.041%
0.0336540%
city
Pacific Grove
MontereZ
0.009%
0.0074842%
city
Salinas
Monterey
0.094%
0.0776576%
Ci
Seaside
Monterej
0.023%
0.0191772%
Cil,
Soledad
Monterej
0,007%e
0.0060870%
COU2!1
Naga CounLv
Na a
0,288%
0.352%
0.2954325%
city
American Canyon
Na a
0.017%
0.0136869%
City
Na a
Na a
0.0780o
0.0642783%
County
Nevada Count
Nevada
0.441%
0.539%
0.4579827%
city
Grass Valley
Nevada 1
0.024%
0.01978050/6
Elm
Docuslgn Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
CitL
Truckee
Nevada
0,003%
0.0023843%
County
Orange County
Orange
4.364%
5.339%
4.5363576%
Cilz
Aliso Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0113841%
city
Anaheim
Orange
0,554%
0.678%
0,5759282%
city
Brea
Orange
0.086%
0.0708897%
city
Buena Park
Orange
0.087%
0.0714352%
city
Costa Mesa
Oran e
0,124%
0.152%
0.1288366%
city
Cypress
Orange
0,033%
0.0271937%
city
Dana Point
Orange
0.001%
0.0005560%
Pa1t>eapahng
Spbdicision'
Classification
Panc�patmg �Subdrvision
-
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plamhff
Sgbdivision =,
Percewa" e:-
Weighted
Allcatton
r l'ercenta e. =:
city
Fountain Valley
Orange
0.055%
0.0455980%
city
Fullerton
Oran e
0.137%
0.168%
0.1425744%
city
Garden Grove
Orange
0.213%
1
0.1752482%
city
Huntington Beach
Orange
0.247%
0.302%
0.2568420%
CilL
Irvine
Orange
0.139%
0.170%
0.1442350%
city
Laguna Beach
Oran e
0.047%
0.058%
0.0493043%
Ci
La una Hills
Orange
0.014%
0.0115457%
city
Laguna Niuel
Orange
0.001%
0.0007071%
Ci
La una Woods
Orange
0,001%
0.0006546%
Ci
La Habra
Oran e
0.060%
0.073%
0,0621049%
city
Lake Forest
Orange
0.012%
0.0101249%
C Ltz
La Palma
Orange
0.012%
0.0095439%
City
Los Alamitos
Oran e
0.008%
0.0069190%
city
Mission Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0117560%
Ci
Newport Beach
Orange
0.179%
0.1470134%
city
Oran e
Oran e
0.150%
0.1231320%
city
Placentia
Orange
0.029%
0,035%
0.0298912%
city
Rancho Santa Margarita
Orange
0.001%
0.0006296%
Ci
San Clemente
Orange
0.008%
0.010%
0.0086083%
Ci
San Juan Ca istrano
Orange
0.008%e
0.0065510%
city
Santa Ana
Orange
0.502%
0.614%
0.5213866%
city
Seal Beach
Oran e
0.020%
0,0165891%
city
Stanton
Orange
0.035%
0.0291955%
city
Tustin
Orange
0.073%
0.0600341%
city
Westminster
Orange
0.104%
0.127%
0.1082721%
17�i' 'l7
7of p
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Yorba Linda
Orange
0.044%
0.0362223%
County
Placer County
Placer
1.045%
1.278%
1.0861002%
city
Auburn
Placer
0.017%
0.0141114%
city
Lincoln
Placer
0.031%
0.0255599%
city
Rocklin
Placer
0.076%
0.0625485%
Takticipatmg;
gbdrvts�on.:
Cliissdioationa-
Panc�patmg Sn4dmsion
County
Abatement
Percentage
Subdmsion„
Rercenta'e.':
Weighted
Allcahon
,Pereenta e..';'.
Ci
Roseville
Placer
0.196%
0.1616559%
County
Plumas County
Plumas
0.205%
0.251%
0.2128729%
CounLy
Riverside County
Riverside
4.534%
5.547%
4.7128296%
city
Banning
Riverside
0.017%
0.0143848%
city
Beaumont
Riverside
0,021%
0.0171135%
city
Blythe
Riverside
0.012%
0.0096714%
city
Canyon Lake
Riverside
0.000%
0.0001761%
Ci
Cathedral City
Riverside
0.067%
0.0553614%
Ci
Coachella
Riverside
0.021%
0.0173054%
city
Corona
Riverside
0.147%
0.1207083%
Citz
Desert Hot Springs
Riverside
0,024%
0.0200433%
city
Eastvale
Riverside
0.000%
0.0002747%
city
Hemet
Riverside
0.051%
0.0421792%
city
Indio
Riverside
0.056%
0.0457794%
city
Juru a ValleX
Riverside
0.001%
0.0008991%
City
Lake Elsinore
Riverside
0.021%
0.0172949%
Ci
La Quinta
Riverside
0,063%
0.0516732%
city
Menifee
Riverside
0.032%
0.0260909%
city
Moreno Vall2Z
Riverside
0.137%
0.1130348%
City
Murrieta
Riverside
0.048%
0,059%
0.0497423%
City
Norco
Riverside
0.016%
0.0134542%
city
Palm Desert
Riverside
0.083%
0.0682465%
city
Palm S rin s
Riverside
0,076%
0.0629862%
Ci
Perris
Riverside
0.009%
0.0076774%
Ci!j
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
0,052%
0.0431098%
city
Riverside
Riverside
0.268%
0.2206279%
city
San Jacinto
Riverside
0.010%
0.0085936%
city
Temecula
Riverside
0.022%
0.0180086%
City
Wildomar
Riverside
0,008%
0.0062500%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1765-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sacramento County
Sacramento
3.797%
4.645%
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
PlaintiffSubdivision
SubdivisionClassification Percents aCi
"3.9465887%Participating
Citrus Hei hts
Sacramento
0.057%
city
Elk Grove
Sacramento
0.130%
0.1066994%
city
Folsom
Sacramento
0.108%
0.08908.50%
City
Galt
Sacramento
0.017%
0.0143704%
city
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento
0.008%
0.0067679%
city
Sacramento
Sacramento
0.721%
0.882%
0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito
0.106%
0.130%
0.1101417%
City
Hollister
San Benito
0.027%
0.0225355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino
3.259%
3.987%
3.3878124%
city
Adelanto
San Bernardino
0.008%
0.0066640%
city
Apple Valley
San Bernardino
0.025%
0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino
0.015%
0.0122056%
city
Chino
San Bernardino
0.064%
0.0525893%
city
Chino Hills
San Bernardino
0.001%
0.0006388%
City
Colton
San Bernardino
0.031%
0.0253443%
City
Fontana
San Bernardino
0.112%
0.0920.543%
City
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino
0.006%
0.0051051%
City
Hesperia
San Bernardino
0.035%
0.0291522%
City
Highland
San Bernardino
0.004%
0.0029061%
City
Loma Linda
San Bernardino
0.009%
0.0071188%
city
Montclair
San Bernardino
0.039%
0.0322108%
city
Ontario
San Bernardino
0.179%
0.1472934%
city
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino
0.084%
0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San Bernardino
0.057%
0.0469150%
City
Rialto
San Bernardino
0.073%
0.0603206%
city
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
0.178%
0.1461880%
city
Twent nine Palms
San Bernardino
0.002%
0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino
0.052%
0.0424460%
city
Victorville
San Bernardino
0.033%
0.0269400%
City
Yucaipa
San Bernardino
0.016%
0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
f;•
9of �.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1785-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino
0.003%
0.0021228%
County
San Die o Counn,
San Diego
5.706%
6.980%
5.9309748%
city
Carlsbad
San Diego
0.128%
0.1050485%
City
Chula Vista
San Diego
0.189%
0.231%
0.1961456%
city
Coronado
San Diego
0.044%
0.0359095%
City
El Cajon
San Diego
0.113%
0.0933582%
City
Encinitas
San Diego
0.061%
0.074%
0.0630289%
city
Escondido
San Diego
0.145%
0.1192204%
Cit3,
Imperial Beach
San Diego
0.014%
0.0118283%
city
La Mesa
San Diego
0.055%
0.068%
0.0575593%
City
Lemon Grove
San Diego
0.022%
0.0183911%
City
National City
San Diego
0.080%
0.0656808%
city
Oceanside
San Diego
0.213%
0.1753428%
city
Poway
San Diego
0.062%
0.0511040%
City
San Diego
San Diego
1.975%
2.416%
2.0531169%
City
San Marcos
San Diego
0.089%
0.0733897%
City
Santee
San Diego
0.033%
0.0268401%
City
Solana Beach
San Diego
0.017%
0.0138564%
city
Vista
San Diego
0.052%
0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco
3.026%
3.702%
3.1457169%
Coun ,
San Joaquin Counn,
San Joaquin
1.680%
2.055%
1.7460399%
City
Latlu-op
San Joaquin
0.009%
0.0075394%
city
Lodi
San Joa uiil
0.053%
0.0439484%
city
Manteca
San Joaquin
0.054%
0.0443454%
City
Ripon
San Joaquin
0.013%
0.0104219%
City
Stockton
San Joaquin
0.313%
0.383%
0.3256176%
city
Tracy
San Joaquin
0.084%
0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo
0.816%
0.999%
0.8484126%
city
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obis o
0.024%
0.0199053%
City
Atascadero
San Luis Obis o
0.029%
0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
EI Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis ObisDo
0.043%
0.0353456%
city
Grover Beach
San Luis Obis o
0.017%
0.0137881%
city
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo
0.020%
0.0160922%
city
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
0.077%
0.0637841%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX 1
county
San Mateo County
San Mateo
1.074%
1.313%
1.1159.599%
City
Belmont
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0169860%
city
Burlingame
San Mateo
0.019%
0.0152537%
city
Daly City
San Mateo
0.044%
0.0363880%
city
East Palo Alto
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0103982%
city
Foster City
San Mateo
0.020%
0.0166101%
city
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo
0.004%
0.0031638%
City
Hillsborough
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0110029%
city
Menlo Park
San Mateo
0.015%
0.0126209%
city
Millbrae
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0105836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo
0.016%
0.0130625%
city
Redwood City
San Mateo
0.056%
0.0463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0172161%
City
San Carlos
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0108885%
City
San Mateo
San Mateo
0.052%
0.0425841%
City
South San Francisco
San Mateo
0.043%
0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara County
Santa Barbara
1.132%
1.385%
1.1768968%
city
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara
0.001%
0.0008938%
City
Goleta
Santa Barbara
0.004%
0.0028969%
City
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
0.047%
0.0389379%
City
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
0.122%
0.1004559%
City
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara
0.058%
0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara
2.404%
2.941%
2.4987553%
city
Campbell
Santa Clara
0.014%
0.0112566%
city
Cupertino
Santa Clara
0.008%
0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara
0.025%
0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Los Altos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103338%
city
Los Gatos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103220%
city
Milpitas
Santa Clara
0.036%
0.0298120%
city
Moran Hill
Santa Clara
0.015%
0.0124619%
city
Mountain View
Santa Clara
0.041%
0.0334608%
city
Palo Alto
Santa Clara
0.039%
0.0323080%
city
San Jose
Santa Clara
0.294%
0.360%
0.3054960%
City
Santa Clara
Santa Clara
0.067%
0.0549723%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Saratoga
Santa Clara
0.004%
0.0034161%
city
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara
0.053%
0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz
0.783%
0.957%
0.8135396%
city
Ca itola
Santa Cruz
0.020%
0.0168191%
city
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
0.143%
0.1180348%
city
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz
0.015%
0.0126525%
city
Watsonville
Santa Cruz
0.063%
0.0520136%
County
Shasta County
Shasta
1.095%
1.339%
1.1380191%
city
Anderson
Shasta
0.024%
0.0198896%
city
Redding
Shasta
0.284%
0.2334841%
city
Shasta Lake
Shasta
0.004%
0.0031993%
County
Siski ou County
Siski ou
0.228%
0.279%
0.2373393%
County
Solano County
Solano
0.760%
0.6260795%
city
Benicia
Solano
0.031%
0.0253903%
city
Dixon
Solano
0.016%
0.0130849%
City
Fairfield
Solano
0.109%
0.0897317%
city
Suisun City
Solano
0.021%
0.0176183%
City
Vacaville
Solano
0.119%
0.0976497%
City
Vallejo
Solano
0.167%
0.1373644%
County
Sonoma County
Sonoma
1.218%
1.490%
1.2661290%
City
Healdsburg
Sonoma
0.032%
0.0266929%
city
Petaluma
Sonoma
0.081%
0.0667507%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Rohnert Park
Sonoma
0.041%
0.0340759%
City
Santa Rosa
Sonoma
0.184%
0.1519070%
city
Sonoma
Sonoma
0.022%
0.0183438%
city
Windsor
Sonoma
0.016%
0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus
1.722%
1.4182273%
City
Ceres
Stanislaus
0.041%
0.0340260%
city
Modesto
Stanislaus
0.217%
0.1788759%
City
Newman
Stanislaus
0.006%
0.0046964%
city
Oakdale
Stanislaus
0.018%
0.0145531%
City
Patterson
Stanislaus
0.015%
0.0126590%
city
Riverbank
Stanislaus
0.010%
0.0085699%
city
Turlock
Stanislaus
0.065%
0.0531966%
US
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX I
County
Sutter County
Sutter
0.306%
0.374%
0.3179548%
city
Yuba City
Sutter
0.074%
0.0606242%
County
Tehanta County
Tehama
0.213%
0.261%
0.2216654%
city
Red Bluff
Tehama
0.014%
0.0117771%
County
Trinity County
Trinity
0.082%
0.101%
0.0855476%
County
Tulare County
Tulare
0.809%
0.990%
0.8410949%
City
Dinuba
Tulare
0.014%
0.0116929%
city
Exeter
Tulare
0.004%
0.0032479%
city
Farmersville
Tulare
0.003%
0.0027879%
City
Lindsay
Tulare
0.007%
0.00.57111%
City
Porterville
Tulare
0.021%
0.0171845%
City
Tulare
Tulare
0.037%
0.0302273%
city
Visalia
Tulare
0.066%
0.0545872%
County
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne
0.486%
0.594%
0.5047621%
County
Ventura County
Ventura
2.192%
2.681%
2.2781201%
city
Camarillo
Ventura
0.002%
0.0012815%
city
Fillmore
Ventura
0.002%
0.0020294%
City
Moorpark
Ventura
0.008%
0.0067337%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Oxnard
Ventura
0.156%
0.190%
0.1617338%
city
Port Hueneme
Ventura
0.021%
0.0174145%
city
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura
0.085%
0.0702181%
city
Santa Paula
Ventura
0.014%
0.0119072%
city
Simi Valley
Ventura
0.065%
0.0533043%
city
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
0.022%
0.0179902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo
0.357%
0.437%
0.3713319%
City
Davis
Yolo
0.055%
0.0451747%
City
West Sacramento
Yolo
0.066%
0.0544321%
city
Woodland
Yolo
0.058%
0.0477904%
County
Yuba County
Yuba
0.214%
0.262%
0.2225679%
City
Mary sville
Yuba
0.014%
0.0112079%
13c p.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate
Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political
subdivisions eligible to participate in the Sun Settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of the City of Santa Ana, the City of Santa Ana, its
counsel Robins Kaplan LLP, and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of
California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop
Agreement).
The City of Santa Ana and Robins Kaplan LLP intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a
State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on
Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Sun Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, the City of Santa Ana may, subject to the limitations of the
Sun Settlement Agreement and CA Sun Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations
imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Sun Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay
a contingent fee to Robins Kaplan LLP. Any such payment from the City of Santa Ana to Robins
Kaplan LLP from the City of Santa Ana's CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed
[PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of the City
of Santa Ana's 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments,
together with any contingency -fees that Robins Kaplan LLP may receive from the Attorney Fee
Fund will not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross recovery of the City of
Santa Ana from the Sun Settlement Agreement.
Robins Kaplan LLP certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund
created under the Sun Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this
backstop agreement. Robins Kaplan LLP further certify that they are not seeking and will not
accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back -
Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Sun Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be
between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the
California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop
Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not req ire the payment ny state funds to
the City of Santa Ana, Robins Kaplan LLP, or a y o r party.
04 , 2025
Alvaro Nunez, City Man er
, 2025
By:
Robins Kaplan LLP
[ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK] o
I
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Zydus Settlement
1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Zydus Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision thereto
(the "Zydus Settlement Agreement"), including Section VI and Exhibit 0, the State of California
proposes this agreement (the "CA Zydus Allocation Agreement") to govern the allocation,
distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections V and
VI of the Zydus Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not
apply to payments made pursuant to Section X of the Zydus Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to Exhibit 0, Paragraph 4, of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA
Zydus Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a
Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or
greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating
Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding
Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Zydus Settlement Agreement.
b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in
California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA
Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or
through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of
California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.
d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a
West -Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. ("Mylan"); Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co.,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS
Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc.,
Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna
Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer
D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies
related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any
state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, as well as
applicable law, and the Zydus Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of
this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement have
the same meaning as in the Zydus Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.
Pursuant to Section VI(D)(1) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund
payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VI(B)(2) of the
Zydus Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund
payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.
This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California' pursuant to Section X of the
Zydus Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees and the Additional
Remediation Amount.
4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Zydus Settlement Agreement, shall
be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15%
to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the
Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, and 15%
of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California Allocation"),
70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts Fund"), and 15% to
the California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund").
A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by
the State for future Opioid Remediation.
B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be
allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed
negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as
adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or
litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in
' For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of
California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of
California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
Or 4.p
2 0• ' -
Docusign Envelope ID: D1 EF72EC-1 7B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFB0E5C
Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For
the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and
counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its
Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision,
and will receive payments as provided in the Zydus Settlement Agreement.
C) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating
Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its
share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a
AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the
"Distributors Settlement"), that city's Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to
the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the
Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change
in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment
Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to
be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the
county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance
with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in
accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct
payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share,
with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund
Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Zydus
Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and
Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating
Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund
that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund,
become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered
within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Zydus Settlement Agreement and
this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however,
that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA
Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must
be transferred to the State.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or
more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to
the Zydus Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA
Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will
be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities
within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program;
(2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD") treatment infrastructure;
(3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including
sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted
by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by
providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn)
and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability,
restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited
to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice -impacted youth, youth experiencing
adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or
(6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for
opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but
not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS
will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating
Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Zydus Settlement
Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private
sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement
Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for
Opioid Remediation consistent with the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus
Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to
reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among
themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being
reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds
must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may
regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of
CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Zydus Settlement Agreement
and this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement
Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Zydus Settlement Agreement or this CA Zydus
Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other
sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating
Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the
Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to
meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and
confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise
enforce the requirements of the Zydus Settlement Agreement or this CA Zydus
Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be
brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on
which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this
agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or
constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits,
investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal
enforcement actions.
C. CA Subdivision Fund
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA
Subdivision Fund. All fiends in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated. among the
Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used,
subject to any limits imposed by the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus
Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-
related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision
Funds be used for litigation -related fees and expenses.
D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee
agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its
contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement
agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its
share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee counsel
("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Zydus Settlement
Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any
payments to contingency -fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such
Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision's total gross recovery under
this Zydus Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments
made under a State Back -Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid
Abatement use requirements under Section VI(B)(1) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement. Before
seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private counsel
representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney
Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Zydus Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel
may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been
reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of
Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California
Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the
request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and
its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney
General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into
agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or
enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any
duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without
limitation the Attorney General.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the
settlement until those funds are frilly expended and for one year thereafter. These reports
will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of fiends from the settlement
will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those
funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a
certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the
settlement have been used in compliance with the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this
CA Zydus Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by
DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives
of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts
Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible
solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for
oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city
within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions'
expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will
be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision.
d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and
expenditures, as required by the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus
Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the
CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must
identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used,
including if used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to
Section VI(B)(2) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, such information must also be
reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Zydus.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to
discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the
State and Participating Subdivisions.
6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court
where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA
Zydus Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet
and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated
motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Zydus Settlement Agreement, this CA Zydus Allocation
Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable
by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this
agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of
such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this
agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d) Except as provided in the Zydus Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed
by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
M
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
The undersigned, Santa Ana city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California
State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds —Zydus Settlement
is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Zydus Settlement and ACCEPTS this
Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds
— Zydus Settlement.
Signature:
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: City Manager
Date: 1i
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5.459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights,
releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision
Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and
Use of Settlement Funds—Zydus Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.
Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the
column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.13.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation
share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating
Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the
column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial
Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding
the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California
Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.13. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,"
the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C.
Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of "100V refers to one -hundred percent
(100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-1785-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta e
County
Alameda County
Alameda
2.332%
2.853%
2.4237952%
city
Alameda
Alameda
0.069%
0.0570162%
city
Albany
Alameda
0.013%
0.0107768%
city
Berkeley
Alameda
0.152%
0.1249656%
city
Dublin
Alameda
0.033%
0.040%
0.0338810%
city
Emeryville
Alameda
0.023%
0.0185765%
city
Fremont
Alameda
0.108%
0.0888576%
city
Hayward
Alameda
0.117%
0.0966218%
city
Livermore
Alameda
0.054%
0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda
0.026%
0.0217626%
city
Oakland
Alameda
0.486%
0.595%
0.5055601%
Ci ,
Piedmont
Alameda
0.014%
0.0114064%
city
Pleasanton
Alameda
0.067%
0.0554547%
city
San Leandro
Alameda
0.039%
0.0321267%
city
Union City
Alameda
0.043%
0.0352484%
County
Amador County
Amador
0.226%
0.277%
0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte
1.615%
1.975%
1.6783178%
City
Chico
Butte
0.216%
0.264%
0.2246499%
city
Oroville
Butte
0.079%
0.0646595%
County
Calaveras County
Calaveras
0.226%
0.277%
0.2351644%
County
Colusa Cout;4�
Colusa
0.059%
0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa
2.102%
2.571%
2.1844585%
City
Antioch
Contra Costa
0.037%
0.0301879%
city
Brentwood
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0215339%
city
Clayton
Contra Costa
0.002%
0.0018060%
City
Concord
Contra Costa
0.055%
0.0456676%
city
Danville
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0082255%
city
El Cerrito
Contra Costa
0.023%
0.0189024%
City
Hercules
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta e
cityLafayette
Contra Costa
0.006%
0.0046030%
Ell
lof
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Martinez
Contra Costa
0.012%
0.0098593%
city
Mora a
Contra Costa
0.004%
0.0031007%
city
Oakley
Contra Costa
0.010%
0.0079416%
city
Orinda
Contra Costa
0.005%
0.0038157%
city
Pinole
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0110909%
City
PittsburgContra
Costa
0.053%
0.0436369%
city
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa
0.013%
0.0106309%
city
Riclunond
Contra Costa
0.146%
0.1201444%
city
San Pablo
Contra Costa
0.018%
0.0148843%
City
San Ramon
Contra Costa
0.021%
0.0176459%
City
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa
0.026%
0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte
0.114%
0.140%
0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado
0.768%
0.939%
0.7980034%
city
Placerville
El Dorado
0.015%
0.0127642%
city
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
0.081%
0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno
1.895%
2.318%
1.9693410%
City
Clovis
Fresno
0.065%
0.0536211%
City
Coalinga
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098554%
city
Fresno
Fresno
0.397%
0.3270605%
city
Kerman
Fresno
0.005%
0.0042534%
city
Kingsburg
Fresno
0.008%
0.0066167%
city
Mendota
Fresno
0.002%
0.0019387%
city
Orange Cove
Fresno
0.004%
0.0035607%
city
Parlier
Fresno
0.008%
0.0069755%
city
Reedley
Fresno
0.012%
0.0098804%
City
Sanger
Fresno
0.018%
0.0146135%
city
Selma
Fresno
0.015%
0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn
0.107%
0.131%
0.1116978%
County
Humboldt Coun ,
Humboldt
1.030%
1.260%
1.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Arcata
Humboldt
0.054%
0.0447660%
city
Eureka
Humboldt
0.117%
0.143%
0.1216284%
city
Fortuna
Humboldt
0.032%
0.0266837%
County
Imperial County
Imperial
0.258%
0.315%
0.2679006%
city
Brawley
Imperial
0.011%
0.0087986%
Mo '�, o
• 13 v"
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Calexico
tin erial
0.019%
0.0152799%
City
El Centro
Imperial
0.158%
0.1302522%
city
Imperial
Imperial
0.006%
0.0048791%
County
Inyo County
In o
0.073%
0.089%
0.0754413%
County
Kern County
Kern
2.517%
3.079%
2.6159145%
city
Arvin
Kem
0.006%
0.0046425%
city
Bakersfield
-Kern
0.212%
0.1747198%
city
California City
Kem
0.009%
0.0070820%
city
Delano
Kern
0.030%
0.0249316%
city
McFarland
Kern
0.003%
0.0025644%
city
Rid ecrest
Kern
0.015%
0.0120938%
city
Shafter
Kem
0.013%
0.0103417%
city
Tehachapi
Kern
0.009%
0.0073580%
city
Wasco
Kem
0.008%
0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings
0.293%
0.2413469%
city
Avenal
Kings
0.007%
0.0056335%
city
Corcoran
Kings
0.013%
0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings
0.027%
0.0226038%
city
Lemoore
Kings
0.016%
0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake
0.795%
0.6545389%
City
Clearlake
Lake
0.041%
0.050%
0.0426253%
City
Lakeport
Lake
0.021%
0.026%
0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen
0.319%
0.391%
0.3320610%
City
Susanville
Lassen
0.027%
0.0219295%
Count
Los An eles Coun ;
Los An eles
13.896%
16.999%
14.4437559%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040024%
City
Alhambra
Los Angeles
0.042%
0.0343309%
city
Arcadia
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0267718%
city
Artesia
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0005100%
city
Azusa
Los Angeles
0.026%
0.0210857%
City
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
0.027%
1
0.02185200/.
Ci
Bell
Los Angeles
0.008%
0.0068783%
City
Bellflower
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0014485%
City
Bell Gardens
Los Angeles
0.014%
0.0114301%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles
0.065%
0.0534897%
City
Burbank
Los Angeles
0.100%
0.0823132%
City
Calabasas
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048948%
City
Carson
Los Angeles
0.019%
0.0159805%
City
Cerritos
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039682%
city
Claremont
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0082584%
City
Commerce
Los Angeles
0.000%
0.0002971%
City
Compton
Los Angeles
0.044%
0.0361882%
City
Covina
Los Angeles
0.028%
0.0229127%
City
Cudahy
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006020%
City
Culver City
Los Angeles
0.055%
0.0449894%
City
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles
0.001%
0.0006993%
City
Downey
Los Angeles
0.052%
0.0429994%
city
Duarte
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0027261%
city
El Monte
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.038%
0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles
0.033%
0.0268020%
Cit3,
Gardena
Los Angeles
0.034%
0.0278088%
city
Glendale
Los Angeles
0.166%
0.1366586%
City
Glendora
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134411%
city
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0040549%
City
Hawthorne
Los Angeles
0.050%
0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
ge
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0145307%
city
Huntington Park
Los Angeles
0.023%
0.0190667%
city
h1 lewood
Los Angeles
0.059%
0.0489195%
City
La Canada Flintrid e
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0025565%
City
Lakewood
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039971%
City
La Mirada
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0081572%
City
Lancaster
Los Angeles
0.045%
0.0369689%
city
La Puente
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012999%
City
La Verne
Los Angeles
0.024%
0.0194190%
City
Lawndale
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0017731%
City
Lomita
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0031940%
City
Long Beach
Los Angeles
0.439%
0.3614151%
city
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
2.715%
3.321%
2.8218811 %
r
4of �:r•_
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles
0.016%
0.0134345%
City
Malibu
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0019269%
City
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260686%
City
Maywood
Los Angeles
0.004%
0.0035528%
city
Monrovia
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.02544.5.5%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles
0.030%
0.0250670%
City
Monterey Park
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0256677%
city
Norwalk
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0258228%
city
Palmdale
Los Angeles
0.046%
0.0375827%
City
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles
0.011%
0.0091483%
City
Pasadena
Los An eles
0.146%
0.1200524%
city
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles
0.111%
0.0911933%
city
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles
0.002%
0.0012645%
city
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
0.062%
0.0506992%
City
Rosemead
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
ercenage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Atication
Percentage
city
San Dimas
Los Angeles
0.003%
0.0022016%
city
San Fernando
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0104837%
City
San Gabriel
Los Angeles
0.018%
0.0147726%
City
San Marino
Los Angeles
0.009%
0.0073791%
city
Santa Clarita
Los Angeles
0.022%
0.0178167%
city
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
0.031%
0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles
0.158%
0.1298513%
City
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0048646%
City
Signal Hill
Los Angeles
0.010%
0.0084884%
City
South El Monte
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039603%
City
South Gate
Los Angeles
0.020%
0.0166272%
city
South Pasadena
Los Angeles
0.012%
0.0095334%
City
Temple City
Los Angeles
0.005%
0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles
0.112%
0.0919820%
City
Walnut
Los Angeles
0.006%
0.0047305%
City
West Covina
Los Angeles
0.049%
0.0404521%
City
West Hollywood
Los Angeles
0.013%
0.0108517%
ARM#:
5of 0
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
City
Whittier
Los Angeles
0.032%
0.0260581%
COUnty
Madera Counh'
Madera
0.349%
0.427%
0.3630669%
city
Chowchilla
Madera
0.012%
0.0097332%
city
Madera
Madera
0.039%
0.0318441%
County
Morin County
Marin
0.564%
0.690%
0.5861325%
city
Larkspur
Marin
0.015%
0.0124697%
City
Mill Valley
Marin
0.020%
0.0168401%
city
Novato
Marin
0.028%
0.0229824%
City
San Anselmo
Marin
0.009%
0.0078062%
city
San Rafael
Marin
0.089%
0.0729823%
County
Mariposa County
Mariposa
0.084%
0.103%
0.0876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino
0.439%
0.536%
0.4558394%
city
Ukiah
Mendocino
0.039%
0.0317153%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Coun Ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta--e
COUnty
Merced County
Merced
0.551%
0.674%
0.5724262%
city
Atwater
Merced
0.024%
0.0195846%
city
Livingston
Merced
0.006%
0.0045873%
city
Los Banos
Merced
0.020%
0.0165142%
city
Merced
Merced
0.061%
0.0500762%
County
Modoc County
Modoc
0.065%
0.080%
0.0678250%
County
Mono County
Mono
0.023%
0.029%
0.0242606%
County
Monterey County
Monterey
0.908%
1.111%
0.9437083%
city
Greenfield
Monterey
0.006%
0.0050552%
city
King City
Monterey
0.005%
0.0037355%
city
Marina
Monterey
0.017%
0.0144098%
city
Monterey
Monterey
0.041%
0.0336540%
city
Pacific Grove
Monterey
0.009%
0.0074842%
City
Salinas
Monterey
0.094%
0.0776576%
city
Seaside
Monterey
0.023%
0.0191772%
city
Soledad
Monterey
0.007%
0.0060870%
County
Napa County
Napa
0.288%
0.352%
0.2994325%
city
American Canyon
Napa
0.017%
0.0136869%
City
Napa
Napa
0.078%
0.0642783%
County
Nevada County
Nevada
0.441%
0.539%
0.4579827%
City
Grass Valley
Nevada
0.024%
0.0197805%
.• o
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Ci
Truckee
Nevada
0.003%
0.0023843%
County
Orange Count
Orange
4.364%
5.339%
4.5363576%
city
Aliso Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0113841%
city
Anaheim
Orange
0.554%
0.678%
0.5759282%
city
Brea
Orange
0.086%
0.0708897%
city
Buena Park
Orange
0.087%
0.0714352%
Ci
Costa Mesa
Orange
0.124%
0.152%
0.1288366%
city
Cypress
Orange
0.033%
0.0271937%
city
Dana Point
Orange
0.001%
0.0005560%
Pdtigipahng
Sgbdnisio� ,
ClaBsiflcatio>
ing
ParticipatSubdrvus�on i
Coun(y
1
Abatement
Percenttge
Plaurt�Yi
Subdrv�Saon i
l'e�ceitliw'e'
Weigb ed '
Allc;hon
,..Percents e,
city
Fountain Valley
Oran e
0.055%
0.0455980%
city
Fullerton
Orange
0.137%N
0.168%
0.1425744%
Ci
Garden Grove
Orange
0.213%
0.1752482%
city
Huntington Beach
Orange
0.247%
0.302%
0.2568420%
Ci
Irvine
Orange
0.139%
0.170%
0.1442350%
city
Laguna Beach
Oran e
0,047%
0.058%
0.0493043%
Ci
Laguna Hills
Orange
0.014%
0.0115457%
city
La una Niguel
Oran e
0.001%
0.0007071%
Ci
La una Woods
Orange
01001%
0.0006546%
City
La Habra
Orange
0.060%
0.073%
0.0621049%
city
Lake Forest
Orange
0,012%
0.0101249%
city
La Palma
Orange
0.012%
0.0095439%
Ci
Los Alamitos
Orange
0.008%
0.0069190%
city
Mission Viejo
Orange
0.014%
0.0117.560%
city
Newport Beach
Oran e
0.179%
0.1470134%
city
Orange
Oran e
0.150%
0.1231320%
city
Placentia
Orange
0.029%
0.035%
0.0298912%
city
Rancho Santa Margarita
Orange
0.001%
0.0006296%
Ci
San Clemente
Orange
0,008%
0.010%
0.0086083%
city
San Juan Ca istrano
Orange
0.008%
0.0065510%
city
Santa Ana
Oran e
0,502%
0.614%
0.5213866%
City
Seal Beach
Oran e
0.020%
O.Oi65891%
city
Stanton
Orange
0.035%
0.0291955%
city
Tustin
Orange
0.073%
0.0600341%
city
Westminster
Orange
0.104%
0.127%
0.1082721%
❑ O 1H Im
7of .'
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Yorba Linda
Orange
0.044%
0.0362223%
County
Placer County
Placer
1.045%
1.278%
1.0861002%
city
Auburn
Placer
0.017%
0.0141114%
city
Lincoln
Placer
0.031%
0.0255599%
city
Rocklin
Placer
0.076%
0.0625485%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
PercentsIrePercents
Weighted
Allcation
e
Ci
Roseville
Placer
0.196%
0.1616559%
Coun
Plumas Count
Plumas
0.205%
0.2510.2128729%
Coun
Riverside Counh
Riverside
4.534%
5.5474.7128296%
cityBanningRiverside
0.017%
0.0143848%
City
Beaumont
Riverside
0.021%
0.0171135%
City
Blythe
Riverside
0.012%
0.0096714%
city
Canyon Lake
Riverside
0.000%
0.0001761%
city
Cathedral City
Riverside
0.067%
0.0553614%
city
Coachella
Riverside
0.021%
0.0173054%
City
Corona
Riverside
0.147%
0.1207083%
City
Desert Hot Springs
Riverside
0.024%
0.0200433%
City
Eastvale
Riverside
0.000%
0.0002747%
city
Hemet
Riverside
0.051%
0.0421792%
City
Indio
Riverside
0.056%
0.0457794%
City
Junta Valley
Riverside
0.001%
0.0008991%
city
Lake Elsinore
Riverside
0.021%
0.0172949%
City
La Quinta
Riverside
0.063%
0.0516732%
City
Menifee
Riverside
0.032%
0.0260909%
city
Moreno Valley
Riverside
0.137%
0.1130348%
City
Murrieta
Riverside
0.048%
0.059%
0.0497423%
city
Norco
Riverside
0.016%
0.0134542%
city
Palm Desert
Riverside
0.083%
0.0682465%
city
Palm Springs
Riverside
0.076%
0.0629862%
City
Perris
Riverside
0.009%
0.0076774%
City
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
0.052%
0.0431098%
City
Riverside
Riverside
0.268%
0.2206279%
City
San Jacinto
Riverside
0.010%
0.0085936%
City
Temecula
Riverside
0.022%
0.0180086%
City
Wildomar
Riverside
0.008%
0.0062500%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
County
Sacramento County
Sacramento
3.797%
4.645%
3.9465887%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Citrus Heights
Sacramento
0.057%
0.0465312%
City
Elk Grove
Sacramento
0.130%
0.1066994%
city
Folsom
Sacramento
0.108%
0.0890850%
City
Galt
Sacramento
0.017%
0.0143704%
City
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento
0.008%
0.0067679%
City
Sacramento
Sacramento
0.721%
0.882%
0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito
0.106%
0.130%
0.1101417%
City
Hollister
San Benito
0.027%
0.0225355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino
3.2590/.
3.987%
3.3878124%
City
Adelanto
San Bernardino
0.008%
0.0066640%
City
Apple Valley
San Bernardino
0.025%
0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino
0.015%
0.0122056%
City
Chino
San Bernardino
0.064%
0.0525893%
City
Chino Hills
San Bernardino
0.001%
0.0006388%
City
Colton
San Bernardino
0.031%
0.0253443%
City
Fontana
San Bernardino
0.112%
0.0920543%
City
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino
0.006%
0.0051051%
City
Hesperia
San Bernardino
0.035%
0.0291522%
City
Highland
San Bernardino
0.004%
0.0029061%
City
Loma Linda
San Bernardino
0.009%
0.0071188%
city
Montclair
San Bernardino
0.039%
0.0322108%
City
Ontario
San Bernardino
0.179%
0.1472934%
city
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino
0.084%
0.0689431%
city
Redlands
San Bernardino
0.057%
0.0469150%
city
Rialto
San Bernardino
0.073%
0.0603206%
city
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
0.178%
0.1461880%
city
Twent nine Palms
San Bernardino
0.002%
0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino
0.052%
0.0424460%
City
Victorville
San Bernardino
0.033%
0.0269400%
City
Yucaipa
San Bernardino
0.016%
0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percenta e
Docusign Envelope ID: D1 EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOESC
APPENDIX 1
city
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino
0.003%
0.0021228%
County
San Diego Coun/y
San Diego
5.706%
6.980%
5.9309748%
city
Carlsbad
San Diego
0.128%
0.1050485%
city
Chula Vista
San Diego
0.189%
0.231%
0.1961456%
city
Coronado
San Diego
0.044%
0.0359095%
City
El Cajon
San Diego
0.113%
0.0933582%
city
Encinitas
San Diego
0.061%
0.074%
0.0630289%
City
Escondido
San Diego
0.145%
0.1192204%
city
Imperial Beach
San Diego
0.014%
0.0118283%
city
La Mesa
San Diego
0.055%
0.068%
0.0575593%
City
Lemon Grove
San Diego
0.022%
0.0183911%
City
National City
San Diego
0.080%
0.0656808%
city
Oceanside
San Diego
0.213%
0.1753428%
city
Poway
San Diego
0.062%
0.0511040%
City
San Diego
San Diego
1.975%
2.416%
2.0531169%
City
San Marcos
San Diego
0.089%
0.0733897%
City
Santee
San Diego
0.033%
0.0268401%
City
Solana Beach
San Diego
0.017%
0.0138564%
City
Vista
San Diego
0.052%
0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco
3.026%
3.702%
3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin Counij,
San Joaquin
1.680%
2.055%
1.7460399%
city
Lathrop
San Joaquin
0.009%
0.0075394%
city
Lodi
San Joaquin
0.053%
0.0439484%
city
Manteca
San Joaquin
0.054%
0.0443454%
City
Ripon
San Joaquin
0.013%
0.0104219%
City
Stockton
San Joaquin
0.313%
0.383%
0.3256176%
city
Tracy
San Joaquin
0.084%
0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo
0.816%
0.999%
0.8484126%
city
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obispo
0.024%
0.0199053%
City
Atascadero
San Luis Obis o
0.029%
0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo
0.043%
0.0353456%
city
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo
0.017%
0.0137881%
city
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo
0.020%
0.0160922%
city
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
0.077%
0.0637841%
lOc 10,21.
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
Count),
San Mateo County
San Mateo
1.074%
1.313%
1.1159599%
city
Behnont
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0169860%
city
Burlingame
San Mateo
0.019%
0.0152537%
city
Daly City
San Mateo
0.044%
0.0363880%
city
East Palo Alto
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0103982%
City
Foster City
San Mateo
0.020%
0.0166101%
city
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo
0.004%
0.0031638%
City
HillsborOUgh
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0110029%
city
Menlo Park
San Mateo
0.015%
0.0126209%
city
Millbrae
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0105836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo
0.016%
0.0130625%
city
Redwood City
San Mateo
0.056%
0.0463511%
city
San Bruno
San Mateo
0.021%
0.0172161%
city
San Carlos
San Mateo
0.013%
0.0108885%
City
San Mateo
San Mateo
0.052%
0.0425841%
City
South San Francisco
San Mateo
0.043%
0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara County
Santa Barbara
1.132%
1.385%
1.1768968%
city
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara
0.001%
0.0008938%
city
Goleta
Santa Barbara
0.004%
0.0028969%
City
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
0.047%
0.0389379%
City
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
0.122%
0.1004559%
City
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara
0.058%
0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara
2.404%
2.941%
2.4987553%
City
Campbell
Santa Clara
0.014%
0.0112566%
City
Cupertino
Santa Clara
0.008%
0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara
0.025%
0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Class
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
ge
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
city
Los Altos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103338%
City
Los Gatos
Santa Clara
0.013%
0.0103220%
city
Milpitas
Santa Clara
0.036%
0.0298120%
city
Morgan Hill
Santa Clara
0.015%
0.0124619%
city
Mountain View
Santa Clara
0.041%
0.0334608%
city
Palo Alto
Santa Clara 1
0.039%
0.0323080%
city
San Jose
Santa Clara
0.294%
0.360%
0.3054960%
city
Santa Clai I
Santa Clara
0.067%
0.0549723%
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 1
city
Saratoga
Santa Clara
0.004%
0.0034161%
city
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara
0.053%
0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz
0.783%
0.957%
0.8135396%
city
Ca itola
Santa Cruz
0.020%
0.0168191%
city
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
0.143%
0.1180348%
city
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz
0.015%
0.0126525%
city
Watsonville
Santa Cruz
0.063%
0.0520136%
County
Shasta County
Shasta
1.095%
1.339%
1.1380191%
city
Anderson
Shasta
0.024%
0.0198896%
City
Redding
Shasta
0.284%
0.2334841%
city
Shasta Lake
Shasta
0.004%
0.0031993%
County
Siski ou County
Siski ou
0.228%
0.279%
0.2373393%
County
Solano County
Solano
0.760%
0.6260795%
city
Benicia
Solano
0.031%
0.0253903%
city
Dixon
Solano
0.016%
0.0130849%
City
Fairfield
Solano
0.109%
0.0897317%
city
Suisun City
Solano
0.021%
0.0176183%
city
Vacaville
Solano
0.119%
0.0976497%
City
Vallejo
Solano
0.167%
0.1373644%
County
Sonoma County
Sonoma
1.218%
1.490%
1.2661290%
city
Healdsburg
Sonoma
0.032%
0.0266929%
city
Petaluma
Sonoma
0.081%
0.0667507%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City
Rohnert Park
Sonoma
0.041%
0.0340759%
City
Santa Rosa
Sonoma
0.184%
0.1519070%
city
Sonoma
Sonoma
0.022%
0.0183438%
city
Windsor
Sonoma
0.016%
0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus
1.722%
1.4182273%
City
Ceres
Stanislaus
0.041%
0.0340260%
city
Modesto
Stanislaus
0.217%
0.1788759%
city
Newman
Stanislaus
0.006%
0.0046964%
city
Oakdale
Stanislaus
0.018%
0.0145531%
City
Patterson
Stanislaus
0.015%
0.0126590%
City
Riverbank
Stanislaus
0.010%
0.0085699%
City
Turlock
Stanislaus
0.065%
0.0531966%
12c p .
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B6-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE50
APPENDIX 1
County
Sutter Coun2
Sutter
0.306%
0.374%
0.3179548%
city
Yuba Ci
Sutter
0.074%
0.0606242%
Coun
Tehama Count
Tehama
0.213%
0,261%
0.2216654%
CiLy
Red Bluff
Tehama
0.014%
0.0117771%
County
Trini2 CountV
TriniLi
0,082%
0,101%
0.0855476%
County
Tulare County
Tulare
0,809%
0.990%
0.8410949%
city
Dinuba
Tulare
0,014%
0,0116929%
city
Exeter
Tulare
0.004%
0.0032479%
city
Fa>mersville
Tulare
0.003%
0.0027879%
city
Lindsay
Tulare
0.007%
0.0057111%
CiLy
Porterville
Tulare
0,021%
0.0171845%
City
Tulare
Tulare
0.037%
0.0302273%
city
Visalia
Tulare
0.066%
0.0545872%
Coun
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne
0.486%
0.594%
0,5047621%
County
Ventura County
Ventura
2.192%
2.681%
2.2781201%
city
Camarillo
Ventura
0.002%
0,0012815%
city
Fillmore
Ventura
0.002%
0.0020294%
city
Moorpark
Ventura
0.008%
0,0067337%
Particfpatmg r
Snpdw�s�on
ClassiHcatton',
Particjpahng Subdrv�sion -
-
County
x t10,Moment
Percentage
Planttdf
Su7td4vision `
Po C >ita'e`
Weighted
Allcation
,,:Perceuta
Ci
Oxnard
Ventura
0.156%�
0.190%
0.1617338%
city
Port Hueneme
Ventura
0.021%
0.0174145%
city
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura
0.085%
0.0702181%
city
Santa Paula
Ventura
0.014%
0.0119072%
CiLy
Simi Valle
Ventura
0,065%
0.0533043%
CL
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
0.022%
0.0179902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo
0,357%
0.437%
0,3713319%
Ci
Davis
Yolo
0.05501.
0,0451747%
city
West Sacramento
Yolo
0,066%
0,0544321%
city
Woodland
Yolo
0.058%
0.0477904%
County
Yuba Count
Yuba
0.214%
0.262%
0.2225679%
city
Mar sville
Yuba
0.014%
0.0112079%
❑"r
Docusign Envelope ID: D1EF72EC-17B5-459A-93D1-E82ABEFBOE5C
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate
Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political
subdivisions eligible to participate in the Zydus Settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of the City of Santa Ana, the City of Santa Ana, its
counsel Robins Kaplan LLP, and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of
California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop
Agreement).
The City of Santa Ana and Robins Kaplan LLP intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a
State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on
Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement.
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, the City of Santa Ana may, subject to the limitations of
the Zydus Settlement Agreement and CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, as well as any other
limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Zydus Settlement CA Subdivision
Fund to pay a contingent fee to Robins Kaplan LLP. Any such payment from the City of Santa
Ana to Robins Kaplan LLP from the City of Santa Ana's CA Subdivision Fund allocation will
not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out
of the City of Santa Ana's 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such
payments, together with any contingency -fees that Robins Kaplan LLP may receive from the
Attorney Fee Fund will not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross recovery of
the City of Santa Ana from the Zydus Settlement Agreement.
Robins Kaplan certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created
under the Zydus Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop
agreement. Robins Kaplan LLP further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept
payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed
through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back -
Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Zydus Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to
be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the
California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop
Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does n t require th ayment of any state funds to
the City of Santa Ana, Robins Kaplan LLP, o other pa
® , 2025ell
Alvaro Nunez, City Ma ger
12025
By:
Robins Kaplan LLP
, 2025
ATTEST: ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
>z
- 1
�.I
.Wnnif all
Cif Clerk
a o
O