The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 14 - Award of a Construction Contract for Bristol St and Memory Lane IntersectionPublic Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 14 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 17, 2026 TOPIC: Award of a Construction Contract to Excel Paving Co. for the Construction the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Project AGENDA TITLE Award of a Construction Contract to Excel Paving Co. for the Construction of the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (Project No. 17-6883) (General & Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $200,000 of spendable fund balance in the Public Works Water Revenue and Water Utility Capital, Transfer from Fund 060 revenue accounts, and appropriate to the Water — Interfund Transfer, Transfer to Fund 066 and Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure accounts (Requires five affirmative votes). 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Program to include an additional $200,000 in construction funds for the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (No. 17-6883). 3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $2,362,238, which includes $1,889,790 for the construction contract, $283,469 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and $188,979 for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 4. Award a construction contract to Excel Paving Co, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $1,889,790, subject to change orders, for construction of the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (No. 17-6883), for a term beginning February 17, 2026, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026 Page 2 DISCUSSION The Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (No. 17-6883) will add a new right -turn pocket in the southbound travel lane of Bristol Street, north of Memory Lane. Proposed intersection improvements include relocating curb/gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, and public/private utilities along a 350 foot section to accommodate the new right -turn pocket on south bound Bristol Street, north of Memory Lane. Once completed, these improvements will complement recently completed improvements from Memory Lane to Santa Clara Avenue resulting in a completed intersection, enhancing the roadway capacity, ride quality, and visual appearance of the Bristol Street corridor. The proposed Bristol Street and Memory Lane intersection improvement project is the last remaining corridor improvement project that will finalize and complete the Bristol Street Widening Project initiated in January of 2000. Project History The Bristol Street Widening Project was planned as a long-term Capital Improvement Project to be completed in multiple phases as funding becomes available. The initial phases (Phases 1 and 2) were completed in 2002 and included improvements from St. Andrew Place to McFadden Avenue and from Elm Street to Memory Lane. Since then, additional enhancements have been completed at key intersections, including Bristol Street and Warner Avenue, Bristol Street and 171 h Street, as well as segments between McFadden Avenue and Civic Center Drive, and from Washington Avenue to 18th Street. On September 17, 2024, the City Council approved the construction contract award for Bristol Improvements Phase 3, covering Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue, which is near completion. On March 4, 2025, the City Council approved the construction contract award for Bristol Street Improvements Phase 4, covering Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place, and is currently under construction. With the approval of this final project and the current construction of Phase 3 and Phase 4 well underway and on schedule, Staff anticipates that the Bristol Street Widening Project that was initiated by the City in 2000 will be completed by December 2026. Grant Funding This project was funded through a matching grant program. At the time of application in 2023, the total estimated project cost was $2,002,640, with 75% ($1,501,900) requested from and awarded by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) under the Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP), and 25% ($500,740) provided as the required local match. The City received the full amount requested from OCTA. As reflected in the results of the competitive bidding process, the project's actual total delivery cost is $2,362,238, due to market conditions. The OCTA grant amount is capped at the awarded level; per OCTA guidelines, pursuing additional funding would require canceling the existing award and reapplying the following grant cycle, adding at Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026 Page 3 least a 12 month delay with no guarantee that a new application would be awarded. In order to complete and deliver the project under current market conditions, an additional $359,598 in local funds is necessary to cover the difference. Project Advertisement and Contractor Procurement To provide local vendors with an opportunity to submit bids, the City notified 88 regional vendors via PlanetBids, many of whom are Santa Ana -based. Furthermore, staff specifically contacted Santa Ana vendors to encourage their participation in bids. A total of three (3) bids were received. No bids were received from Santa Ana contractors. As required by law, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register on October 10, 2025, and October 14, 2025. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from October 1, 2025, to October 17, 2025. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on October 17, 2025. No bid protests were submitted by any bidders during the bid protest period. A copy of construction plans, contracts, specifications, and all related reference materials (such as The Greenbook) is available for public review at the City's Public Works Agency, Central Files office located in City Hall. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER'S NAME LOCATION BID 1 Excel Paving Co. Long Beach, CA $1,889,790 2 All American Asphalt Corona, CA $2,399,329 3 Onyx Paving Company, Inc. Yorba Linda, CA $2,425,000 A total of three (3) responsive bids were received. Excel Paving Co. submitted the lowest responsive bid of $1,889,790 (Exhibit 2). Based on the bid analysis and a contractor's reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Excel Paving Co. (Exhibit 3). Excel Paving Co. has performed work as a prime contractor in the City of Santa Ana in the past five (5) years, including projects such as West Willits Protected Bike Lanes, Safe Routes to School at Davis Elementary, and Miscellaneous Storm Drain Repairs. The contractor satisfactorily completed these projects, and staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Excel Paving Co. (Exhibit 3) Proiect Delive To deliver a complete project, the estimated total project delivery cost includes a budget allocation for construction administration, inspection, and testing, in addition to the construction contract. Construction administration and inspection may be performed by either Staff or consultants and includes construction management; inspection of the Contractor's work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; materials Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026 Page 4 testing; and implementation of labor requirements. Any allocated construction administration funds not spent are considered project savings and returned to the respective fund balance upon project closeout. As indicated in the Cost Analysis and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $2,362,238. Project Item Total Construction Contract Bid Amount $1,889,790 Construction Administration $151,469 Inspection $96,000 Testing $36,000 Unanticipated or Unforeseen Work $188,979 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $2,362,238 Proiect Schedule and Contract Time The project is estimated to be completed in August 2026, barring unforeseeable conditions such as rain, natural disasters, or other delays beyond the control of the City and of the Contractor. The contract time for this project is 90 working days, as specified in the bid documents. Working days are counted in accordance with the City's Standard Specifications, which exclude weekends, City -observed holidays, and inclement weather days that prevent work. The contractor was required to submit a construction schedule as part of their bid to expedite project delivery. The projected completion date, based on the submitted schedule, falls within the allotted 90 working days. If the contractor fails to deliver on time, they will be assessed a penalty of $3,300 per calendar day as specified in the bid documents. Proiect Milestones Milestone Estimated Completion Notes Administrative Startup February 2026 Contract execution, bonds, insurance Material Procurement March 2026 Procurement may take place concurrently with construction. Contractor Mobilization April 2026 Start of construction activities Project Completion I August 2026 1 Based on 90 working days Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026 Page 5 Project Phasing The contractor will be constructing this project in a singular phase, fulfilling the scope of work as outlined in the contract documents. The contractor is responsible for determining the scheduling and sequencing of activities based on their proposed means and methods. Public Outreach The project scope will impact nearby businesses and residents. To ensure timely and effective communication, the following notification measures will be implemented prior to the start of construction: • Electronic message signs will be installed two weeks in advance of construction activities to provide early notice of the project's start date, • A project information sign will be posted at the construction site, including contact information for public inquiries, • Residents and businesses within 1,000 feet of the project limits will receive door hangers or mailed notifications at least two weeks before construction begins, • A second round of notification will be issued 48 hours prior to the start of construction to residents and businesses adjacent to the limits of work, and • The City will also disseminate information through its official website and social media platforms to keep the public informed of construction activities, including any lane closures. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In 1990, the City Council approved the Bristol Street Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR No. 89-01). Due to minor design modifications, an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR was prepared and adopted by City Council on December 5, 2017, pursuant to the California Environmental Act (Exhibit 4). The proposed project complies with the adopted Environmental Impact Report. FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $2,362,228. All funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2025-26. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The proposed contract authorizes staff a maximum of 10% for construction contract change orders for unanticipated or unforeseen work. Staff will return to the City Council for authorization and appropriation of additional contingency if necessary. Approval of the requested appropriation adjustment will recognize $200,000 from the spendable fund balance in the Public Works Water Revenue and Water Utility Capital, Transfer from Fund 060 revenue account, and appropriate the same amount to the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026 Page 6 Water — Interfund Transfer, Transfer to Fund 066, and Acquisition & Construction, Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure account. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the current fiscal year will be presented to the City Council for approval of carryovers to Fiscal Year 2026-2027. Approval of the request to reallocate funds will provide a total of $260,238 in unspent funds from Project 23-6702. Accounting Fiscal Unit — Account Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year No. Description Account Description (Project No.) CURRENT BUDGET 05917663-66220 Select Street Gas Tax HUTA 2103, 2025-26 (17-6883) Construction Improvements Other $400,000 Than Building CTFP Grant — Measure M2 2025-26 03217663-66220 Measure M Competitive Street, $1,501,900 (17-6883) Street Improvements Other Construction Than Building APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Water Water Utility Capital 2025-26 06617647-66301 Acquisition & Projects, Water $200,000 (17-6883) Construction Capital Project REALLOCATION 05917663-66220 Select Street HUTA 2103 Gas Tax, 2025-26 (From 23-6702 Construction Improvements Other $260,338 to 17-6883) Than Buildings TOTAL $2,362,228 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Location Map 2. Bid Proposal 3. Construction Contract 4. Environmental Determination 5. Capital Improvement Project Worksheet Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nunez, City Manager EXHIBIT 1 MEMORY LANE J Q m r"--- - SANTA ANA Project No. 17-6883: Phi Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Location Map CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 17-6883 BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: tflkl b REQUIREMENT: EXCEL PAYING COMPANY The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $ $ 2 Unclassified Excavation* 500 CY $ $ 3 Cold Mill (3")* 22,800 SF $ $ 4 AC Pavement* 610 TN $ $ 5 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) * 400 TN $ $ 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB)* 100 -Cy $ $ 7 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") 2,700 SF $ $ 8 PCC Driveway Approach (T=8") 600 SF $ $ 9 PCC Curb Ramp (T=4") 400 SF $ $ PCC Brick Red Colored with Topcast 500 SF $ $ Exposed Aggregate (T=4") III PCC Bus Pad (Include Dowels) 200 SF $ $ 12 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-8) 400 LF $ $ 13 PCC Curb (Type B-1) 440 LF $ $ 14 PCC Curb (SPPWC Type Al-6) 30 LF $ $ P-1 of P-20 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 17-6883 BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty it Price Amount 15 PCC Retaining Curb* 40 TLF$ $ 16 Furnish and Install Landscape (with 1 LS $ $ Irrigation) 17 60 Working Days Landscape and 1 LS $ $ Irrigation Maintenance 18 Local Depression (C.S.A STD 305) 1 EA $ $ 19 Furnish and Install Modular Wetland 1 LS $ $ System (MWS-L-4-4-V-UG) or Approved Equal 20 Parkway Culvert (Modified C.S.A STD 1 EA $ $ 318) 21 8" SDR 26 PVC Pipe with Catch Basin 20 LF $ $ Tie -In 22 Additional Potholing (As Needed)* 5 EA $ $ 23 Remove Block Wall & Reconstruct End 1 LS $ $ 24 Remove Block Wall with Wrought Iron 1 LS $ $ Fence & Reconstruct End 25 Retaining Wall 60 LF $ $ 26 Wrought Iron Fence 45 LF $ $ 27 Remove Chain Link Fence 175 LF $ $ 28 Furnish and Install Chain Link Fence 165 LF $ $ 29 Traffic Signal Modification 1 LS $ $ 30 Install Video Detection System 1 EA $ $ 31 Install GTT Opticom EVP System 1 EA $ $ 32 Install 2" PVC Conduit 450 LF $ $ 33 Install 3" PVC Conduit 500 LF $ $ 34 Install4" PVC Conduit 350 LF $ $ P-2 of P-20 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 17-6883 BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 35 Install SCE Handhole 1 EA $ $ 36 Install No. 5 Pull Box 3 EA $ $ 37 Install No. 6 Pull Box 4 EA $ $ 38 Install �No.:6E Pull Box 3 EA $ $ 39 Install IP Communication System 1 LS $ $ 40 Signing and Striping 1 LS $ $ 41 Install Street Light Pole 1 EA $ $ 42 Remove & Salvage Street Light Pole 1 EA $ $ 43 Pothole Pole Locations for Utility 3 EA $ $ Conflicts 44 Temporary Overhead Wiring 1 LS $ $ 45 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover to 1 EA $ $ Finished Grade 46 2" Copper Water Service 1 EA $ $ 47 4" Water Service 1 EA $ $ 48 6" Fire Service 1 EA $ $ 49 Fire Hydrant 1 EA $ $ 50 Re -configure Existing Fire Protection 1 LS $ $ Backflow Assembly at 2724 N. Bristol Street 51 Project Advertisement Sign 1 EA $ $ 52 1 Construction Permit 1 LS $10,000 $ P-3 of P-20 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 17-6883 BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BASE BID 1 $ The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 7-3.5 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within number (90) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $3,300 per calendar day. PALP 11'10 L33A Name of Firm EXCEL PM INg COMPANY 11 Signature of BIDDER Title (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) 0ORFORAMON pAtxF li Yam' iJ ✓. EX.t n PALING COMPANY Curtis P. Brown III President and Chief Executive Officer David A. Drukker Vice President end Chief Financial Officer Stefani A. Moreno Corporate Secretary Crissa A. Phillips Assistant Secretary P-4 of P-20 CITY OF SANTA ANA CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 17-6883 BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 17th day of February, 2026 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and Excel Paving Co (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR").. WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENT") identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • Information to Bidders • Bid Proposal • Bid Bond • Contract Form • Contract Bonds • General Provisions • Special Provisions • Technical Provisions and Project Plans • Community Workforce Agreement • Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed One Million Eight Hundred Eighty Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety and No Cents ($1,889,790), as set forth and identified in the itemized BID PROPOSAL uploaded by the Contractor to PlanetBids, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A". The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. rev. 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 3 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements and Liquidated Damages section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit `B") including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City's website at: htW://www.santa-ana.org/pwa/documents/CWA.,pdf 7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. 8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars.($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. 10. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to CITY, from and against any liability, claims, actions, costs, damages or losses, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for injury, including death to any person or damage to any property, arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to, any of the following: (i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work of Improvement by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier; (ii) Performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents; Page 2 of 3 (iii) The construction activities of CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, either on the project site or on other properties; (iv) The payment or nonpayment by CONTRACTOR of any of its Subcontractors of any lower tier, for Work of Improvement performed on or off the project site; and (v) Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons related to and arising from the performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of the Work of Improvement. (vi) The indemnity obligations of Subcontractors provided by this Section shall be included in all subcontract documents issued by CONTRACTOR. Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: JENNIFER L. HALL City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney a y, K,Y`.E NELLESEN Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Digitally signed by Rodolfo Rosas Rodolfo Rosas DRndolfnRn,a,.ema,l-„o=a=�=a 1aa ao,9 N Date: 2026.01.2715:54:02-08'00' RODOLFO ROSAS, P.E. Acting Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA ALVARO NUNEZ City Manager CONTRACTOR: Excel Paving Co B Curtis P Brown III T LE: President Page 3 of 3 City of Santa Ana Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (Project #17-6883), bidding on 10/17/2025 2:00 PM (PDT) Page 1 of 5 Printed 12/22/2025 Exhibit A Bid Results Bidder Details Vendor Name Excel Paving Co Address 2230 Lemon Ave Long Beach, California 90806 United States Respondee Louis Flores Respondee Title Estimator Phone 562-599-5841 Email lflores@excelpaving.net Vendor Type CADIR License # 688659 Bid Detail Bid Format Electronic Submitted 10/17/2025 1:44 PM (PDT) Delivery Method Bid Responsive Yes Bid Status Submitted Confirmation # 452643 Respondee Comment Buyer Comment Attachments File Title Bid Proposal.pdf 2025-10-17 Santa Ana -Ownership (LF) Bristol.pdf 2025-10-17 Santa Ana Bond (LF) Bristol.pdf 2025-10-17 Santa ANa- Non Collusion(LF) Bristol.pdf File Name Bid Proposal.pdf 2025-10-17 Santa Ana -Ownership (LF) Bristol.pdf 2025-10-17 Santa Ana Bond (LF) Bristol.pdf 2025-10-17 Santa ANa- Non Collusion(LF) Bristol.pdf File Type General Forms Ownership Affidavit (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Bid Bond Guaranty (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Non -Collusion Affidavit (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition PlanetBids City of Santa Ana Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (Project #17-6883), bidding on 10/17/2025 2:00 PM (PDT) Page 2 of 5 Printed 12/22/2025 Line Items Discount Terms No Discount PlanetBids City of Santa Ana Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (Project #17-6883), bidding on 10/17/2025 2:00 PM (PDT) Page 3 of 5 Printed 12/22/2025 Item # Item Code Type Item Description UOM QTY Unit Price Line Total Response Comment Bid Items $1,889,790.00 1 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 Yes 2 Unclassified Excavation- CY Soo $500.00 $250,000.00 Yes 3 Cold Mill (3")• SF 22800 $2.00 $45,600.00 Yes 4 AC Pavement* TN 610 $172.00 $104,920.00 Yes 5 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM)' TN 400 $165.00 $66,000.00 Yes 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB)` CY 100 $98.00 $9,800.00 Yes 7 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") SF 2700 $20.00 $54,000.00 Yes 8 PCC Driveway Approach (T=8") SF 600 $42.00 $25,200.00 Yes 9 PCC Curb Ramp (T=4") SF 400 $53.00 $21,200.00 Yes 10 PCC Brick Red Colored with Topcast Exposed Aggregate (T=4") SF Soo $40.00 $20,000.00 Yes 11 PCC Bus Pad (Include Dowels) SF 200 $44.00 $8,800.00 Yes 12 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2.8) LF 400 $114.00 $45,600.00 Yes 13 PCC Curb (Type B-1) LF 440 $67.00 $29,480.00 Yes 14 PCC Curb(SPPWC Type AI-6) LF 30 $68.00 $2,040.00 Yes 15 PCC Retaining Curb- LF 40 $150.00 $6,000.00 Yes 16 Furnish and Install Landscape (with Irrigation) LS 1 $34,000.00 $34,000.00 Yes 17 60 Working Days Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 Yes 18 Local Depression (C.S.A STD 305) EA 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Yes 19 Furnish and Install Modular Wetland System (MWS-L-4.4-V-UG) or Approved Equal LS 1 $68,000.00 $68,000.00 Yes 20 Parkway Culvert (Modified C.S.A STD 318) EA 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 Yes 21 8" SDR 26 PVC Pipe with Catch Basin Tie -In LF 20 $300.00 $6,000.00 Yes 22 Additional Potholing (As Needed)- EA 5 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 Yes 23 Remove Block Wall & Reconstruct End LS 1 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 Yes 24 Remove Block Wall with Wrought Iron Fence & Reconstruct End LS 1 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 Yes 25 Retaining Wall LF 60 $1,700.00 $102,000.00 Yes 26 Wrought Iron Fence LF 45 $500.00 $22,500.00 Yes 27 Remove Chain Link Fence LF 175 $24.00 $4,200.00 Yes 28 Furnish and Install Chain Link Fence LF 165 $120.00 $19,800.00 Yes 29 Traffic Signal Modification LS 1 $298,000.00 $298,000.00 Yes 30 Install Video Detection System EA 1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 Yes 31 Install GTT Opticom EVP System EA 1 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 Yes 32 Install 2" PVC Conduit LF 450 $31.00 $13,950.00 Yes 33 Install 3" PVC Conduit LF Soo $37.00 $18,500.00 Yes 34 Install 4" PVC Conduit LF 350 $62.00 $21,700.00 Yes 35 Install SCE Handhole EA 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 Yes 36 Install No.5 Pull Box EA 3 $1,300.00 $3,900.00 Yes 37 Install No.6 Pull Box EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 Yes 38 Install No. 6E Pull Box EA 3 $3,000.00 $9,000.00 Yes 39 Install IP Communication System LS 1 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 Yes 40 Signing and Striping LS 1 $26,000.00 $26,000.00 Yes 41 Install Street Light Pole EA 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Yes 42 Remove & Salvage Street Light Pole EA 1 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 Yes 43 Pothole Pole Locations for Utility Conflicts EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 Yes 44 Temporary Overhead Wiring LS 1 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 Yes 45 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover to Finished Grade EA 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Yes 46 2" Copper Water Service EA 1 $49,000.00 $49,000.00 Yes 47 4" Water Service EA 1 $98,000.00 $98,000.00 Yes 48 6" Fire Service EA 1 $76,000.00 $76,000.00 Yes 49 Fire Hydrant EA 1 $59,000.00 $59,000.00 Yes City of Santa Ana Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (Project #17-6883), bidding on 10/17/2025 2:00 PM (PDT) Page 4 of 5 Printed 12/22/2025 Item # Item Code Type Item Description 50 Re -configure Existing Fire Protection Backflow Assembly at 2724 N. Bristol Street 51 Project Advertisement Sign 52 Construction Permit UOM QTY Unit Price Line Total Response Comment LS 1 $31,000.00 $31,000.00 Yes EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Yes LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Yes City of Santa Ana Page 5 of 5 Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (Project #17-6883), bidding on 10/17/2025 2:00 PM (PDT) Printed 12/22/2025 Line Item Subtotals Section Title Line Total Bid Items $1,889,790.00 Grand Total) $1,889,790.00 PlanetBids Exhibit B CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 17-6883 BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BASE BID $ 1,889,790.00 The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 7-3.5 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within number 90 working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be /$`3,300 per calendar day. PALP 11110. 'J5A Name of Firm EXCEL PM IN" CCMPAN Signature of BIDDER Title (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) 0ORFORK1100 p;�i,p ii i% iJSA EX.tE:LPA1fING COMPANY Curtis P. Brown III President and Chief Executive Officer David A. Drukker Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Stefani A. Moreno Corporate Secretary Crissa A. Phillips Assistant Secretary P-4 of P-20 jmf 11/15/17 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 89-01 FOR THE BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT PERTAINING TO THE INTERSECTION OF BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On November 19, 1990, the City Council approved the Final Environmental Impact Statement I Environmental Impact Report No. 89-01 ("FEISIEIR°) for the widening of a 3.9-mile segment of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, hereinafter referred to as the "Project". B. The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that if there are minor technical changes or additions to a project, and no new or substantially more severe significant effects result, an addendum to an approved EIR must be prepared. C. The City Council has previously considered and approved various addenda to the FEISIEIR, most recently in 2015 for design modifications to Phase IV of the Project, between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place. D.To address minor design modifications to the Project concerning the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection, a further Addendum has been prepared, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A ("Addendum"). E. On December 5, 2017, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15164, the City Council considered for approval this Addendum to the FEISIEIR. Section 2. The City Council previously approved and adopted the FEISIEIR for the Project. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Addendum to the FEISIEIR was prepared for the Project. Based upon the studies, the City Council determines that there are no new significant impacts or any increases in the severity of the impacts previously identified in the original FEISIEIR. The City Council hereby approves the Addendum to the FEISIEIR, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 2017-077 Page 1 of 4 Section 3. These decisions are based upon the Request for Council Action dated December 5, 2017, and exhibits attached thereto; the public comments; and the Final Environmental Impact Study 1 Environmental Impact Report No. 89-01, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The City Council directs that any necessary Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the Clerk of the County of Orange in the matter as required by law. Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 2017. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: �641A-/ JdbA M. Funk Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES ABSTAIN NOT PRESENT: Resolution No. 2017-077 Page 2 of 4 Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Benavidez, Sarmiento, Solorio,_Villega (4) Martinez M Sarmiento (1) Pulido (1) jmf 11/15/17 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Maria D. Huizar, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2017-077 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on December 5, 2017. Date: C- A ; f f1,-� A Maria D. Huizar Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2017-077 Page 3 of 4 Defer to Laserfiehe for "Exhibit A" Resolution No. 2017-077 Page 4 of 4 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project No. 17-6883 Lead Agency: CITY OF SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, California 92702 Contwt• Kenny Nguyen 714.647.5632 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 Contwt• Ms Kristen Bogue 949.472.3505 Approved on December 5, 2017 JN 161391 This document is designed for double -sided printing to conserve natural resources. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................. 1.1 Purpose of an Addendum ................................................ 1.2 Project Location.............................................................. 1.3 Project Background... ...................................................... 1.3.1 Approved 1990 Final EIRIEIS ........................... 1.4 Project Description.......................................................... 1.4.1 Proposed Intersection Improvements ................. 1.4.2 Proposed Property Acquisition .......................... 1.4.3 Changes as Compared to the Approved Project. 1.4.4 Construction Timeframe.................................... 1.5 Discretionary Actions ...................................................... 1.6 Clarifications to the Addendum Upon Certification ....... ............1-1 ............1-2. ............1-3 ............1-6 ............1-6 ............1-8 ............1-8 ............1-8 ..........1-10 ..........1-10 ..........1-12 ..........1-12 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST .................................................... ........2-1 ............................. 2.1 Background .......................................... .......................................................................... ..... 2-1 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................................................3-1 3.1 Aesthetics............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Air Quality ............... ..................................................................................................... ....3-4 3.4 Biological Resources...........................................................................................................3-7 3.5 Cultural Resources.............................................................................................................. 3-8 3.6 Geology and Soils............................................................................................................... 3-9 3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions............................................................................................... 3-12 3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials..................................................................................... 3-13 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality...........................................................................................3-17 3.10 Land Use and Planning..................................................................................................... 3-19 3.11 Mineral Resources............................................................................................................. 3-20 3.12 Noise................................................................................................................................. 3-20 3.13 Population and Housing.................................................................................................... 3-22 3,14 Public Services..................................................................................................................3-23 3.15 Recreation......................................................................................................................... 3-24 3.16 Transportation/Traffic....................................................................................................... 3-25 3.17 Tribal Cultural Resources................................................................................................. 3-27 3.18 Utilities and Service Systems............................................................................................3-28 3.19 Mandatory Findings of Significance................................................................................. 3-30 4.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................4-1 APPENDICES: Appendix A Modified Initial Study Checklist Final I December 2017 i Table of Contents ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 -V F LIST or EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Regional Vicinity ................................................. .............. .................................................... 1-4 Exhibit2 Site Vicinity............................................................................................................................1-5 Exhibit 3 Existing Land Uses 1990 FEIS/EIR........................................1-7 Exhibit 4 Proposed Lane Geometrics........................................................... .......................................... 1-9 Exhibit 5 Bristol Street/Memory Lane Intersection Configuration (1990 FEIS/EIR) ......................... 1-11 Exhibit 6 Memorandum: Landscape Strip Exception..........................................................................1-13 IIqRIIts] Arl1-1q -1 Table 1 Proposed Property Acquisition ................ ............ ....... ....... ....... ............. ....... ............. ............ 1-S Final I December 2017 ii Table of Contents ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS § Section AAQS ambient air quality standards AB Assembly Bill AM ante meridiem APN Assessor Parcel Number AQMP Air Quality Management Plant C1 Community Commercial Caltrans California Department of Transportation CAP Climate Action Plan CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CPRC California Public Resources Code CWA Clean Water Act DOC Department of Conservation EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency etc. etcetera FEISIEIR Final Environmental Impact Statement/EnvironmentaI Impact Report FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program GC General Commercial GH0 greenhouse gas I Interstate LOS Level of Service LR 7 Low Density Residential mph miles per hour NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards No. number NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 03 ozone OQTD Orange County Transit District PM post meridiem PM10 particulate matter less than less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter Final I December 2017 iii Table of Contents ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 PM2s particulate matter less than less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter R1 Single -Family Residential ROW right-of-way RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAB South Coast Air Basin SLAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD 'South Coast Air Quality Management District SCH State Clearinghouse SD27 Specific Development SIPS state implementation plans SR State Route SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TCE Temporary Construction Easement TCMs Transportation Control Measures TPD tons per day UBC Uniform Building Code U.S. United States UST underground storage tank Final I December 2017 iv Table of Contents ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed changes to the widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane as proposed in the Project Final Environmental Impact Statement) Environmental Impact Report No. 89-01 (FEISIEIR) approved in 1990 (FHWA-CA-EIS-89-01-F; State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 87071509). This Addendum focuses on the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane (the Project),. situated in the northern segment of the Bristol Street Widening Project. This Addendum provides an assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with minor design modifications and the issues of climate change and tribal cultural resources which were not specifically addressed in the previously certified FEISIEIR. Design modifications to the Project, since approval of the 1990 FEISIEIR- that are addressed in this Addendum include the following: The original approved 1990 FEISIEIR proposed the same intersection lane configuration as that proposed. As shown on Exhibit 5, the 1990 FEIS/EIR considered a 117-foot ROW width in order to accommodate the additional third through lane, specifically for the southbound travel lane However, no specific take of adjoining properties was acknowledged although the existing ROW is only 100 feet. Thus, the Project changes clarify that in order to accommodate a third -through lane, the Project requires to widen the existing street right-of-way (ROW) width of 100 feet to 111 feet, with the street section width from 84 feet to 95 feet, and the partial acquisition of three properties. Although the proposed lane configuration was analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR, necessary partial ROW acquisition to accommodate this configuration was not considered, Proposed ROW acquisition would be required on the west side of Bristol Street,. north of the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane. Refer to Section 1.4.2, Proposed Property Acquisition, for a detailed description and mapping of these new areas of acquisition: These Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) include 002-261-06, -229, and -30. Areas of proposed ROW acquisition consists of vacant land, ornamental landscaping, and areas of paved driveway; no modification/demolition of habitable structures would be required as part of these new partial acquisitions to accommodate the Project. The Project would also accommodate a bike lane and relocate the existing perimeter fencing along Bristol Street and may include an extension of the existing storm water pipeline system (located on the eastern side of Bristol Street) through a new lateral connection and new catch basin at -the Project site. Additionally, the topics of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and tribal cultural resources were not specifically identified in the previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR as these topics were not a subject matter that required evaluation pursuant to CEQA at that time. As such, this Addendum analyzes the effects of GHG emissions associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project, as well as the ProjecCs potential to affect tribal cultural resources. This Addendum to the previously certified 1990 FEISIEIR has been prepared because Project -related modifications to the Bristol Street alignment d❑ not trigger the need for further environmental analysis in a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the requirements CEQA (refer to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, resp ectively). 1.1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM TJnder CEQA, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no Subsequent EIR may be required for that project unless the lead agency determines, based upon substantial evidence, that one or more specked circumstances has occurred. Only if one or more of the following circumstances arises is a Subsequent EIR required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162: Final I December 2017 1-1 Introduction ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revision o, f the previous VR tMe to the involvement o, f ne w significant environmental effects `ecis or a substantial increase to the severity of previously identified significant e, f fects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaWn which will require major revision of the previous EIR dace to the involvement of .new sig4fcant environmental increase in the severity ofpreviouslyidentjied significant effects, or 3. New information ofsubstantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; (B) &gni cant efects previously exarnined will be substantiaRy more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mtigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation -measure or alternative; or (D,) Mtigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more signifiicant effects on the environ- ment but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[a]) A Supplement to an EIR (or Supplemental EIR), which is narrower in scope than a Subsequent EIR, may be prepared if any of the above criteria apply, but "only minor changes or additions would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15163[a][2]). In the absence of the need to prepare either a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, an Addendum may be prepared. More specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states: (a) The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified VR if some changes or aMtions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of asnbsequent EIR have occurred (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the ,preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred tc) An addendum need not he circulatedfor public review bid can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. (d) The decision -making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declarationprior to making a decision on the project (e) A brief explanation of the decisions not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should he included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record The explanation must be supported bysubstantial evidence. This Addendum to the previously certified FEISIEIR for the approved Bristol Street Widening Project has been prepared because the evaluation of the proposed modifications does not result in any of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent or Supplemental EISIE[R. Although the proposed modifications would result in development that differs from that in the 1990 FE[SIE[R, those modifications do not trigger the need for preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the criteria listed in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, respectively. Section 2.4, Environmental Checkitst, and Section 3.4, Environmental Consequences, of this Addendum demonstrate that no substantial changes would result from the proposed Project modifications nor have the existing conditions in the Final I December 2017 1-2 Introduction ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1 -6883 Project vicinity substantially changes such that major revisions to the previously certified 1990 FEISIEIR would be required. The Project would not result in a new significant environmental effect or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Specifically, the proposed modifications, as compared to the 1990 FEISIEIR, do not result in new or substantially greater significant impacts because the scale and nature of the proposed modifications are sufficiently similar to that analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR such that the impacts of the proposed modifications are within the levels and types of environmental impacts disclosed in the 1990 FEISIEIR In addition, no substantial changes in circumstances under Section 15162(a)(2) have occurred since the certification of the 1990 FEISIEIR for the approved Bristol Street Widening Project that would result in new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, since the background environmental conditions have not significantly changed since that time. The City of Santa Ana has received no information indicating there has been a substantial change in any circumstances that would result in a new or substantially greater significant impact. Furthermore, no new information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the 1990 FEISIEIR preparation, has been revealed that shows new or substantially greater significant impacts would result (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[a][3]). In addition, there are no new or different mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts of the approved Bristol Street Widening Project but that are not adopted. The proposed modifications do not identify or require adoption of any further mitigation measures or alternatives beyond those provided in the certified 1990 FEISIEIR for the approved Bristol Street Widening Project, since additional mitigation measures are either not necessary or not feasible, and the alternatives analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR represent a reasonable range as required pursuant to CEQA (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[a][3]). This Addendum relies on the certified 1990 FEISIEIR and the related administrative record, in addition to the additional documentation included to support the Addendum. The Addendum is to be included or attached to the 1990 FEISIEIR and is not to be considered as an independent or separate document. As this Addendum does not identify new or substantially greater significant impacts, circulation for public review and comment is not necessary pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c). However, the City will provide a 30-day public notice for Public Hearing, at which time the City Council will consider and adopt or reject this Addendum (refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[d]). The findings of the City Council in its resolution of adoption of this Addendum,. if adapted, will reflect this Addendum, which provides the basis and substantial evidence for the decision not to prepare a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR (refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[e]). 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION The proposed Project includes the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane in the City of Santa Ana (City). The City, located within the County of Orange, is surrounded by the cities of Tustin, Orange, Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, and Garden Grove. The Project site is Iocated approximately 0.73 mile west of Interstate 5 (I-5) and approximately 0.25 mile south of State Route 22 (SR--22); refer to Exhibit 1 Regiamd Yacindt and Exhibit 2. vicLnity. The Project area and surrounding vicinity are located within an urbanized area of the City. Existing land uses near the Project site .consist of multi- and single-family residential uses, commercial uses, and vacant land These surrounding land uses are further described as follows: North: Bristol Street continues north of the Project site. Commercial uses (a small strip -mall with neighborhood serving retail uses are located to the northwest and Floral Park Promenade is located to the northeast). These properties are designated by the General Plan as Low Density Residential (LR-`) and General Commercial (GC), respectively, and both properties are zoned by the Municipal Code as Community Commercial (CI). Final I December 2017 1-3 Introduction s LOS A N G E L E S COUNTY F9 La Brea I Habra IMPERIAL `HNC'. Yorl>a Linda JC9ps Los Alamitos I1 �J Seal Beach WARNER Huntington Bea ch Project Site S A N B E R N A R❑ I N O COUNTY r~ Fullerton Anaheim Anaheim Hills 6 Villa Park KATELLA AVE. 2 CHAPMAN AVE. Orange Garden e e Grove � Tustin�aQ� SaN, Santa o i Ana EDIIJGER AVE. 9L� © Fad mF Irvine tea" � so I 9 Costa m Q Mesa 41 � Q 0 � P ✓oqQ N G � � �Y �9ArS ap NILL9 �Cc RIUpA Newport a2 Beach Laguna Niguel Laguna e� Beach k/ ORANGE COUNTY Lake Dana Point Mission Viejo San Juan San � Clemente R I V E R ST 0 C O U N Y r L t I 1' S A N D I E G O I C O U N T Y PI'(-Jject �5,Ite BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Q not to scale Regional Vicinity INTERNATIONAL 07/27/17 JN 161391 MAS Exhibit f •v� � h��a .ti . �.7 f �. � 'yam S � ��.�.. �� 1 ORANGE ROAD 3 --w � `rf 1 t • �:' � � : �. ► ,��I- . , ^s�� Isa �; ra � r ate, .�' CORRIGAN AVENUE co �` f �-�_ j'•^ � ..fir: � � ; W . '�.• - i � `yi , Z�'1, � N , ;:. � 'i°''�i�y- �' i H �. G4: F• Yam. 5.• '=�+s�. .�+-_�.��Q f ,�• . LU it 'A Pioj ec Si AP MEMORY LANE74 ^� wl ,'��' .I` . �,- MARCH �Ak�N� _ '�'� � •� ."; �� ..: � ^�, i y.. .jf ��' �'• • _R` �y�l..r i�..Y. r '^ is .R' . y,,,� '� + Lm m' r W. PARK LANE iF Pi r l rf Mom` Michael Baker ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 ■ East: Memory Lane continues east of the Project site. Commercial uses (Floral Park Promenade located to the east and northeast and a Shell gasoline service station located to the east and southeast) are present. These properties are al designated GC and zoned C1. Further southeast of Shell, single-family residential uses (designated LR-7 and zoned Single -Family Residence [R1]) are present. Sonth: Bristol Street continues south of the Project site. Commercial uses (the Shell gasoline service station located to the south and southeast and a strip -mall with neighborhood serving retail uses located to the south and southwest) are present. All of these properties are designated GC and zoned C1. Further southeast of Shell, Casa de Santiago single-family residential uses (designated LR-7 and zoned R1) are present ■ Mest: Memory Lane continues west of the Project site. Vacant land (designated GC and zoned Cl) is situated to the west of the Project site and further west is the Portofino Apartments (designated Ll 7 and zoned Specific Development [SD27]). Islander Apartments (designated LR-7 and zoned C1) are situated to the west and northwest of the Project site. As shown on Exhibit 3, Existing land Uses (199O-EISIEIM, these land uses have not substantially changed since preparation of the 1990 FEISIEIR. It is acknowledged that the 1990 FEISIEIR did not include land uses north of Memory Lane in the applicable figures. In order to provide information on land uses north of Memory Lane, Exhibit 3 als❑ identifies these current land uses. These current land uses have not substantially changed since the 1990 FEISIEIR, as the 1990 FEISIEIR considered the surrounding land uses to include a mix of commercial and residential development. 1.3 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1.3.1 APPROVED 1990 FINAL EIR/E15 The City of Santa Ana General Plan designates Bristol Street as a Major Arterial Highway traveling in a north -south direction. As a result of signifi.cant growth and traffic congestion on Bristol Street, the City of Santa Ana, in the late 1980s, proposed to widen Bristol Street from a four -lane roadway to a six -lane arterial in accordance with adopted County of Orange and City of Santa Ana standards for a Major Arterial Highway. A joint EIS/EIR was prepared and approved by the City of Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the widening of Bristol Street in 1990. The 1990 Bristol Street Widening Project entailed a 3.9-mile segment of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane. The Project site is situated within the northern -most portion of Bristol Street, previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR as the segment from Seventeenth Street to Memory Lane. However, due to significant costs associated with construction and availability of funding, the Bristol Street Widening Project was divided into multiple segments and phases, compared to that analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR: ■ Phase I, from McFadden Avenue to Pine Street; ■ Phase II, from 316 Streetto Civic Center; ■ Phase IIIA, from Civic Center to Washington Avenue; ■ Phase IIIB, from Washington Avenue to 17a' Street; and ■ Phase IV, from Warner Avenue to St Andrew Place. The Bristol Street Widening segments operate independently; operation of one segment is not dependent on another. It is acknowledged that prior to dividing the Bristol Street Widening Project for funding purposes, construction of some sections was completed and was not included in the phasing described above, including the following: • St Andrew PIace to McFadden Avenue; • Elm Street to Memory Lane, and ■ Pine Street to 31d Street. The segment between 17a' Street and Elm Street is not funded;. therefore, no phasing has been identified. Final I December 2017 1-6 Introduction Note: shows current land use as of2077" I w i z a } I BRISTOL STREET o w g ;;ii.� iiiim ;asiiaa ��fu -- m�— iilliiilliiiliiiAliiilRill StflilSltillifimm1111t121 111:11:1: 1C —' an �l 1 a GREELJRRIER STREET �y g GREENBRIER STREET CITY OF WNT ANA 3 SALJTIACO ❑ Z x UTILRIESAG JCY ELEMENIARYSCHOOl a } BRISTOL STREET BRISTOL STREET � asa uuaaauauaauasusauasusa •uuaa `c ao=a U: aauaaauauaaauausaauausa oauauoa au • w asa asuaaausuaauummumsa usuaaaua auaa CHURCH OF uauuuaauauuauuuaua uaauaaua !S=!2 JESUSCHRISTOE Z �z � LarrERonvsanJTs HESPERIAN STREET � a HESPERIAN STREET g� LEGEND 0 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL GAS STATION Source Willdan ASSOCIateS I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L Vnot to scale BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Existing Land Use (1990 FEISIEIR) 1111 0/1 ; JIV 161391 NIAS Exhibit 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1 -6883 The 1990 FEISIEIR (SCH No. 87071509) was approved on November 19, 1990. The 1990 FEIS/EIR and associated technical studies, incorporated herein by reference, documented the environmental impacts of widening Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane in the City of Santa Ana. As stated in the 1990 FEISIEIK the purpose and goals of the Bristol Street Widening Project were to: 1. Provide sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate current and future traffic demand. 2. Improve the performance and safety of the roadway for the benefit of the motoring public. 3. To reduce current and projected future delays experienced at major intersections and to design intersections to function at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS). 4. To design the roadway in manner conducive to the provision of public transportation, namely bus service provided by the Orange County Transit District (OCTD). 1.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.4.1 PROPOSED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS The City proposes the widening of Bristol Street, just north of Memory Lane, to accommodate a third southbound through lane at the intersection; refer to Exhibit 4, Proposed Law Geometrics. This additional through lane would result in the relocation of the existing dedicated right -turn lane slightly west. The proposed widening would involve the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to accommodate the new total ROW widths (proposed to expand from 100 feet to III feet). The proposed intersection improvements would require relocation of curb/gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, and both public and private utilities (including the existing traffic signal). Existing perimeter fencing along Bristol Street would also be relocated and replaced in -kind with a similar aesthetic treatment Due to the existing building setback requirements, the Project would require approval from the City Manager for landscape strip Exceptions for building setbacks per Municipal Code Section 41-781. The Project proposes a 12-month construction period (anticipated to be completed by December 2019), At least one lane in each direction of travel would remain open and existing driveway access along Bristol Street and Memory Lane would be retained at all times. The maximum excavation depth would be two feet for roadway excavation, and approximately 10 feet or less for utility footings/excavation. Approximately 30 cubic yards of cut material is anticipated to be exported. Other improvements may include a new stormwater catch basin and a new lateral connection to the existing stormwater pipeline in Bristol Street 1.4.2 PROPOSED PROPERTY ACQUISITION As listed in Table 1. Proposed Property Acquisition, a total of three Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) (002-261- 06, -29, and -30) would be partially acquired as a result of the proposed intersection improvements; refer to Exhibit 4. All proposed areas of acquisition include vacant portions of commercial and multi -family residential properties. These vacant areas consist of bare soils, paving/asphalt, or ornamental landscaping. The acquisitions would comply with policies pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as implemented by the City of Santa Ana. Table 1 Proposed Property Acquisition Permanent Temporary AM Address Existing Land Use Acquisition Type Acquisition Construction Easement t (squarefeetj (square feet) 002-.261-0,6 2702 N. Bristol Street Vacant Oommemial Partial andTGE 1,586 72d 002-261-29 1313 W. Memory Lame Ornamental Landscaping and Driveway Partial and TCE 1,265 575 Associated with the Portofino .Apartments 002-261-30 2724 N. Bristol Street Ornamental Landscaping and Driveway Partial and TCE 394 457 Associated with the IslanderA artments Nolen: TOE = TempiraryConstruction Easement Final I December 2017 1-8Introduction APN: 002-261-06 APN: 002-261-29 2702 N. BRISTOL ST. 1313 VV- MEMORY LN ,—DROP, R/W LEGEND Impacted Properties 0 Proposed Temporary Construction Easement 0 Proposed Sidewalk 0 Proposed Street Pavement Source- Santa Ana Public Works Agency INTERNATIONAL 1 1: 1 f�17 .1N !f I:VfI MAS RAISED MEDIAN NOT TO SCALE APN: 002-261-30 2724 N- BRISTOL ST, 0 BRISTVL ST 46 7jr BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Proposed Lane Geometrics Exhibit 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1 -E883 1.4.3 CHANGES AS COMPARED TO THE APPROVED PROJECT It should be noted that Project phasing has been revised from the original phases identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR, As discussed in Section 1.3.1. Apnroved 1990 final construction phasing of the entire Bristol Street Widening Project has been further subdivided as follows: ■ St Andrew PIace to McFadden Avenue (Constructed in 2002); ■ Elm Street to Memory Lane (Constructed in 2003); ■ Pine Street to 316 Street (Constructed in 2009); ■ Phase I: McFadden Avenue to Pine Street (Constructed in 20111); ■ Phase II: 316 Street to Civic Center Drive (Constructed in 2014); 4 Phase IIIA: Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue; • Phase IIIB: Washington Avenue to 17'i' Street (under construction); ■ Phase IV:. Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place; and ■ Phase V: 17a' Street to Elm Street. The proposed intersection improvements (proposed Project addressed herein) differs from the original configuration of the 1990 FEISIEIR, as follows: As shown on Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 5, Bristol SYreetlAkmory Lam Intersection Conggurcdion (1990 F+EISIEIR z the original approved 1990 FEISIEIR proposed the same intersection lane configuration as that proposed. As shown on Exhibit 5, the 1990 FEISIEIR considered a 117-foot ROW width in order to accommodate the additional third through lane, specifically for the southbound travel lane. However, no specific take of adjoining properties was acknowledged although the existing ROW is only 100 feet. Thus, the Project changes clarify that in order to accommodate a third -through lame, the Project requires to widen the existing street ROW width of 100 feet to 111 feet, with the street section width from 84 feet to 95 feet, and the partial acquisition of three properties. Although the proposed lane configuration was analyzed in the 1990 FEI'S/EIR, necessary partial ROW acquisition to accommodate this configuration was not considered. Proposed ROW acquisition would be required on the west side of Bristol Street, north of the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane. As depicted on Exhibit 5, these Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) include 002-201-06, -29, and -30. Areas of proposed ROW acquisition consist of vacant land, ornamental landscaping, and areas of paved driveway; no modification/demolition of habitable structures would be required as part of these new partial acquisitions to accommodate the Project. The Project would also accommodate a bike lane andrelocate the existing perimeter fencing along Bristol Street and may include an extension of the existing storm water pipeline system (located on the eastern side of Bristol Street) through a new lateral connection and new catch basin at the Project site. An assessment of construction and Project -related GHG emissions and potential impacts to tribal cultural resources was also not addressed in the 1990 FEISIEIR, and as a result is addressed in this Addendum, 1.4.4 CONSTRUCTION TIMEFRAME Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would occur following acquisition of the required parcels. The Project proposes a 12-month construction period (anticipated to be completed by December 2019). However, it is acknowledged that the Project could be constructed in multiple phases, depending on funding. ' Phase numbers were assigned to the Bristol Street Widening Project subsequent to cancelation of the CenterLine Light Rail Transit Project and associated reallocation of funding. from that canceled project to the Bristol Street Widening Proj ect. Final I December 2017 1-10 Introduction >Tr w r L i3' 1T tT 1T 10' J a �A �t M w I Q 13 .1 1T la M. IT 1T 143' I I I 94' i Bristol Street Source Wilidan Associates BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Bristol Street/Memory Lane Intersection Configuration not to scale (1990 FEIS/EIR� INTEARAT100AL W. f 7,17 AN i 611fil W,' Exhibit 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 1.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS Landscape strip Exceptions for building setbacks must be approved by the City Manager per Municipal Code Section 41-781, and this Addendum must be adopted by the City of Santa Ana City Council as to its adequacy in complying with the requirements of CEQA and the previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR. The City Council will consider the information contained in the Addendum and the 1990 FEISIEIR in making a decision to approve or deny the proposed Project. 1.5 CLARIFICATIONS TO THE ADDENDUM UPON CERTIFICATION As documented throughout Section 3.0, Environmental Consequences, the project does not involve substantial changes, such that major revisions to the previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR are required. Substantial changes with respect to circumstances have not resulted. No new information of substantial importance has occurred. The project would not result in new or more significant impacts than what was previously considered. Previously identified significant impacts would not be substantially increased as a result of the project. No new mitigation measures would be required. Thus, the City of Santa Ana, as the Lead Agency, has determined that Project related modifications to the Bristol Street alignment do not trigger the need for further environmental analysis in a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the requirements CEQA (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, respectively). As this Addendum does not identify new or substantially greater .significant impacts, a 30-day circulation for public review and comment is not necessary pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section I5164(c) and was not conducted. However, it is acknowledged that the City provided a 10-day public notice for Public Hearing, at whit$ time the City Council considered the Addendum for certification. One public comment letter regarding the project was submitted at the Public Hearing (conducted on December 5, 2017) by Mr. Mark Rosen. The comment letter did not specifically include any comments pertaining to the content or adequacy of the Addendum. The Addendum was certified on December 5, 2017 (pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section I5164[d]). The findings of the City Council in its resolution of adoption of this Addendum reflect this Addendum, which provides the basis and substantial evidence for the decision not to prepare a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR (refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[e]), and, thus, no further action is required. On December 5, 2017, City Council authorized City Manager to approve an exception to the landscape strip setback per Municipal Code Section 4I -781. The approved landscape exception is shown in Exhibit 6Memorandum. Final I December 2017 1-12 Introduction MEMORANDUM' Raul Godinez H, City Manager To: City Manager Office Date: December 5, 2017 Fred Mousavipour, Executive Directo From: Public Works Agency �F `- PROJECT NO. 17-6883 Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Widening —Requirement of Landscape Strip Subject: Project background: Bristol Street is classified as a north -south Major Arterial per the City's General Plan Circulation Element (GPCE) and the County of Orange's Master Plan of Arterial Highway (MPAH). Currently, the segments to the south and north of the Bristol Street/Memory Lane intersection have 3 lanes in each direction except for the southbound lanes just north of Memory Lane where is has only 2 southbound lanes. The Bristol Street/Memory Lane intersection project is proposed to accommodate a third southbound through lane just north of Memory Lane (Exhibit A). This additional through lane would result in the relocation of the existing dedicated right -turn lane slightly west. The proposed widening would involve the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to accommodate the new total ROW widths from 100 feet to 111 feet. As a result of the widening, the back of new sidewalk is measured approximately 11 feet from the patio fence at 1313 W. Memory Lane and 12 feet to 14 feet from the entrance structure at 2724 N. Bristol Street (Exhibit B & Q. According to Municipal Code Section 41-781, Requirement of landscape strip as part of street widening, the following applies: (a) Whenever city acquires a portion of parcel along street frontage for a street widening or other public works project, the city shall also acquire an interest in the real property sufficient to allow a landscape -only strip behind the sidewalk that is of a width that conforms to the then current city standard for the parcel. (b) The city manager may authorize exceptions to this section on a case -by -case basis, in consultation with the city council. The current city standard requires a landscape setback of 15 feet. To avoid full acquisitions of 1313 W. Memory Lane and 2724 N. Bristol Street, staff is requesting the City Manager authorize this exception to landscape setback requirement Enclosure: Exhibit A Approved: Exhibit B Exhibit C Raul Godinez Date: City Manager CC, I" Eaw 764--1 #, 12 5 1 EX ibit 6 0 z O N 1 \ I a Lt LU l O 1. .ram 1 _ Nm 41d Z C 0 z 0 � O LL i .I a { a 0 a Ia i I ! 1 N1 AHON V� za 4 Z C N J I LA +:. y T it j• �f � :� _ _ i /yil I f 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2.1 BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (Project No. 17-6883) 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36 Santa Ana, CA 92702 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kenny Nguyen, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer 714.647.5632 4. Project Location: The intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane in the City of Santa Ana. The Project site is located approximately 0.73 mile west of Interstate 5 (I-5) and approximately 0.25 mile south of State Route 22 (SR- 22). 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36 Santa Ana, CA 92702 6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) and Low Density Residential (LR-7) 7. Zoning: Community Commercial (Cl) and Specific Development (SD27) 8. Description of the Project: The City proposes the widening of Bristol Street, just north of Memory Lane, to accommodate a third southbound through lane at the intersection. This additional through lane would result in the relocation of the existing dedicated right -turn lane slightly west The proposed widening would involve the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to accommodate the new total ROW widths (proposed to expand from 100 feet to 111 feet). The proposed intersection improvements would require relocation of curblgutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, and both public and private utilities (ncluding the existing traffic signal). Due to the existing building setback requirements, the Project would require approval from the City Manager for landscape strip Exceptions for building setbacks per Municipal Code Section 41-781. The original approved 1990 FEIS/EIR proposed the same intersection lanes width and configuration as that proposed. The 1990 FEISIEIR considered a II7-foot ROW width in order to accommodate the additional third through lane, specifically for the southbound travel lane. However, no specific take of adjoining properties was acknowledged although the existing ROW is only 100 feet. Thus, the Project changes clarify that in order to accommodate a third -through lane and bike lane, the Project requires to widen the existing street ROW width of 100 feet to I I I feet, with the street section width from 84 feet to 95 feet, and the partial acquisition of three properties. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Surrounding land uses consist of commercial and multi- and single-family residential uses; refer to Section 1.2, 22L Lr]Cc?tIdI2 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement). • City of Santa Ana Final I December 2017 2-1 Environmental Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 This page intentionally left blank. Final I December 2017 2-2 Environmental Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES This section describes the effects of the proposed Project as compared to those identified in the previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR document, and to existing conditions and any changes in regulatory setting since the previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR. Furthermore, this section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project. The issue areas evaluated in this document include the following, pursuant to Appendix 0 of the CEQA Guidelines, and have been modified to evaluate the proposed Project changes for which an FEISIEIR has been previously approved (in 1990) to assist in the determination of the need for a supplemental EISIEIR or an Addendum. The modified Initial Study checklist, comparing the effects of the Project modifications as compared to those analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR, is found in Appendix A, AIocfiiaed Initial &udv Checklist. ■ Aesthetics • Agricultural and Forestry Resources ■ Air Quality ■ Biological Resources ■ Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils ■ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ■ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ■ Hydrology/Water Quality • Land Use ■ Mineral Resources ■ Noise ■ Population and Housing ■ Public Services ■ Recreation • Transportation/Traffic ■ Tribal Cultural Resources • Utilities/Service Systems ■ Mandatory Findings of Significance A summary of impacts of the previously approved Bristol Street Widening Project and the mitigation .measures imposed is provided along with an analysis of the potential impacts resulting from the proposed Project and whether those impacts substantially exceeds those discussed in the previously approved 1990 FEISIELR. 3.1 AESTHETICS This section corresponds with the following 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences aW M igcrtionMeasures, subsections: ■ Subsection A, Landform AMificadoft; • Subsection G, Urban Landscaping; • Subsection J, Light aW Glare; and ■ Subsection K,Aesthetic Considerations. Would the project: a) Have a substantial a&erse ffect on a seenk vista? The proposed Project would not result in any significant modifications or changes from the previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR. The Prcject is located within a highly developed urban area of the City of Santa Ana, Existing land use near the Project site consists of multi- and single-family residential uses, commercial uses, and vacant land. No scenic vistas are located within the Project area. No impact to scenic vistas would result from the proposed Project. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. Final I December 2017 3-1 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1 -E883 b) Substatfidlly damage scenic resources, including but not limfted to, trees, rock outcroppings: and historic bur7dWgs widusa a state seenk highway? State Route 91 is located approximately 10 miles north-east of the Project site.? The Project would not be visible from SR-91. No impacts would occur in this regard. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c) ,Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality ofMe site and its surroundings? The proposed. Project is located in a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana The Project would widen the existing roadway ROW from 100 fleet to 111 feet, resulting in additional property take for the purposes of roadway use. These changes in character would be similar to those analyzed in the 1990 FEI& EIR. Per the 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures 0-1 and G-2, the Project would be compatible with the Bristol 'Street Widening Project landscaping theme and a Xeriscape (climate appropriate landscaping) program would be considered. Existing perimeter fencing along Bristol Street would be relocated and replaced in -kind with a similar aesthetic treatment. These changes in character/quality would be nominal, compared to that previously considered. As such, the proposed Project would not result in sub stantially.greater impacts thanpreviously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: G-1 A consistent theme will be developed and implemented for the landscaping within the public right-of- way for Bristol Street as a part of the s treet w id en ing project, G-2 Consideration will be .given to the implementation of a Xeriscape landscaping program. Such a program would involve the use of low -maintenance, drought -tolerant plant materials, thereby reducing Iong-term costs for maintenance and water consumption. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. d) aetde a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Light and glare are currently generated from various sources within the Project area (e,g., commercial and retail businesses, signage, street lighting, and parking lot lighting). The proposed Project does not involve the construction of any habitable structures. Relocation of the street lighting fixtures would occur. Therefore, no new sources of light or glare would result with implementation of the proposed Project The proposed Project would not generate additional daytime or nighttime illumination beyond that currently experienced within the area. The relocation of the traffic signal pole would be required to meet the Citywide Design Guidelines and the 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure J-1 pertaining to cut-off shielding techniques. With compliance with the 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation, the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: J-1 Consideration will be given to the selection of new street fixtures which have cut-off shields to minimize light and g lare nui s anc es for residential properties adjoining Bristol Street. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required California Department of Transportation, California ucemc Highway Mapping System., http:/twww.dot.ca.govi hq/LandArchllS livability/scenic highways/index.htm, accessed August 30, 2017. Final I December 2017 3-2 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 3.2 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES The previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR did not include evaluation for agricultural resources, as no agricultural resources are Iocated within the area of analysis. In determining nhether impacts to Wricu& ural resources are significant environmental e,,( etv, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture andfwmlannd In determining whether impacts to forest resources; including timberland are sigu ficarnt environmental effects; lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Deparimennt of Forestay mind Fire Protection regarding the slate's inventory of forest land rrr Auffng the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; andforest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the Cahyorn&Air Resources Board Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Fwmland or Farmlandd of Statewide Importance (Farmland}, as shown on the mars prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the CaVornia ResourcesAgency, to non-agricultural ruse? The Farmland Mapping. and Monitoring Program classifies the Project site as Urban and Built-up Ian&, No Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance is located in the vicinity of the Project site. No impacts would result from the proposed Project. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIE[R. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Conflict MA exisMV zoning for agrtwulhwal use, or a Williamson Act contract? The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized area in the City of Santa Ana. Lands within the Project area are designated General Commercial and Low Density Residential as identified in the City of Santa Ana's General Plan. The zoning designation of properties within the Project area are Community Commercial and Specific Development (SD27). No agricultural uses exist on site or in the vicinity, and the Project would not conflict with a Williamson Act contract as none exist in the Project area. The proposed Project would not result in .greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicablew Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c) Conflict WM existing zonnft for, or cause rezoning, of, forest land (any defined in Public Resources Code section 11110(g)), tvnberlaad (as defrned by Public Resources Code section 4516), or timberlaind zoned Timberland Production (as defrned by Government Code section 511 b4(g)) ? The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized area in the City of Santa Ana. The zoning designation of properties within the Project area are Community Commercial and Specific Development (SD27). No forest land or timberland production exist on site or in the vicinity, and the Project would not conflict zoning pertaining to these resources. The proposed Projectwould not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FE[SIE[R. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. ' Ca[iforniaDepartment of Conservation, Orange County Important Farmland 2014, ftp:Ilftp.consrv.ca.gov/pu$Idtrp/ F3MPIpdr120141ora14.pdf, accessed August 17, 2017, Final I December 2017 3-3 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 do Result in the loss afforest land or conversion afforest land to non forest rise? Refer to Response 3.2(c). Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FFEIS(EIRMitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion afforest land to non -forest use? Refer to Responses 3.2 (a) through 3.2(c). Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed, in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.3 AIR QUALITY This section corresponds with 1990 FEISIEIR Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mfigation Akasutes, Subsection H, Air Quality, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts of the previously approved Where available, the s4ptificarnce criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district maybe relied upon to make the follo dM determinations: Would the project. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plate? The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable plans, ordinances and policies establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system as described in the 1990 FEISIEIR. According to the 1990 FEISIEIR, the widening of Bristol Street was designated in the Orange County Mader Plan, and was recommended in the Bristol Street Corridor Study — Final Report, prepared by Mohle, Grover & Associates, dated 1983.4 It was also recommended in the Arterial Highway Element — SanlaAna Element — Santa Ana Ransportation Corridor State II Alternative Analysis, prepared. by Parsons, Brinckerhoff', Quade and Douglas, Inc., dated 1983. The proposed widening is also consistent with the recommendation found in thelntercity Liaison Committee — Five - Year Ransportation Study Update to 1990, prepared by Basmaciyan-Darnell, Inc., dated 1985.1 Furthermore, the proposed Project would improve traffic operations through the Project corridor. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR. The Bristol Street Widening Project is included in SCA&.9 2016-2040 Regional Transportation PlaWSustainable Communities Strategy (RTPISCS): A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of life (2016 RTP) (RTP ID ORA125).6 The Project is also currently_ listed in SCAG's financially constrained 2017 Federal Ransportaiion Improvement Program (2017 FTIP) for fiscal year 2016/2017 — 2021/2022. The Project .entry in the 2017 FTIP identifies the following scope of work: BRISTOL ST (MEMORY LANE TO 17TH STREET AND �3RD STREET TO ST. ANDREWS PLACE) WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 LANES; split project ORA250003, ORA150004, ORA150005, ORA150006.7 4 POWER Engineers, Bristol Street Widening Pha,7e II14 — C'ivic Center Drive to Washington Awnue Hrrvironmentat Impact Report Addendwn, January 20, 2015. s ibid 6 Southern California Association of Governments, 2016-2040 Regional Trransportatlon �ianlStrstalrrttble Communities Strategy (RTAISCS), 7kansportation System Project List, 2016. 1 Southern California Association of Governments. Final =7 Federal-Z'ranspnrtation .Improvement .PrDgram, 2016. Final I December 2017 3-4 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1 -E883 The Project's design concept and scope have not changed significantly from what was analyzed in the RTIP and FTIP. This analysis found that the plan and, therefore the individual projects contained in the plan, are conforming projects and would have air quality impacts consistent with those identified in the SIPs for achieving the NAAQS. The FHWA determined the RTIP to conform to the SIP. The proposed widening of Bristol Street, from Memory Lane to 171 Street has been included in the FTIP since 1992. The FTIP gives priority to eligible Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) identified in the SIP and provides sufficient funds to provide for their implementation. The FHWA determined the MP to conform to the SIP on December 16, 2016. No significant impacts would occur. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Furthermore, the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) is designated by the state and US Environmental Protection Agency WA) as nonattainment for ozone (O3), and particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less (PM25) and attainment/maintenance for carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter 10 microns in diameter or less PM1o. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) developed regional emissions thresholds to determine whether or not a project wouId contribute to air pollutant violations. If a project exceeds the regional air pollutant thresholds, then the project would substantially contribute to air quality violations in the SCAB. In addition, a projeet would also contribute to air pollutant violations if localized emissions result in an exceedance of the ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The proposed Projectwould be consistent with the Major Arterial designation of the City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element and the County of Orange's Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Additionally, the Project would improve traffic flow, maintain vehicle capacity, reduce idling and result in a reduction in air pollutant emissions as was previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Thus, no new or substantial increase of impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required.. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. h) violate xty air quaafity stmidard or con"We smbstaudalty to arc exrstf►zg or projected air grralrty violmtion? All proposed areas of acquisition include vacant portions of commercial and multi -family residential properties. These vacant areas consist of dirt, paving/asphalt or ornamental landscaping. The Project proposes to change the existing street section from a total ROW width of 100 feet to 111 feet, which is a nominal increase over what was previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. No structure modification/demolition would be required as part of these new partial acquisitions to accommodate the Project. As determined in the 1990 FEISIEIR, short-term construction emissions from the Project would be below the SCAQMD's significance thresholds for all criteria pollutants, including PMIo and PM2.5, even in the absence of specific dust reduction measures. Construction phasing for the proposed Project would be similar to the construction activities and phasing described in the 1990 FEISIEIR for the Project Therefore, the construction emissions would be similar to those in the 1990 FEISIEIR. It has been determined that construction emissions would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Thus, impacts are considered less than significant. Because emissions were found to be below the SCAQMD's significance thresholds, Project related construction emissions are not considered by the SCAQMD to result in a significant air quality impact. In addition, mitigation measures included in the 1990 FEISIEIR would further reduce construction -related air quality impacts. The proposed Project would improve traffic flow and reduce idling, as the Project would add one additional through lane and this configuration was analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. The modifications to the 1990 FEISIEIR would add more ROW to the existing right -turn lane and serve to increase traffic flow through the intersection, but would not increase the overall road capacity, previously considered lane configuration, or air quality impacts disclosed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. The proposed Project would result in the same operational air emissions as that considered in the 1990 FEISIEIR, which were below SCAQMD thresholds. Thus, no new or substantial increase of impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required. Final I December 2017 3-5 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: H-1 SCAQMD Rule 403 will be adhered to; insuring the clean-up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. H-2 Adequate watering techniques will be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction - generated dust particulates. H-3 Construction equipment will be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. H-5 The use of energy efficient lighting along Bristol Street (low pressure sodium vapor lights) will be considered to reduce emissions at the power plant serving the area. H-5 Traffic signals along Bristol Street will continue to be synchronized (AQMP control measures K2). H 7 Construction activities will be halted during Stage One and StageTwo smog alerts. Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. cj Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of aay criteria pollutant for nfafch Me project region is non -attainment under as applicable federal or state ambient air qualify standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantUadve thresholdsfor ozone precursors)? The SCAB is designated by the EPA and the State as being nonattainment for 03, PM1o, and PM2 s. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily threshold values does not add significantly to a cumulative impact As mentioned above, the development of the proposed Project demonstrates that construction and operational activities would not result in emissions in excess of SCAQMD's threshold values. Since the proposed Projectwould not exceed the SCAQMD's significance thresholds for construction activities or the operations phase, the SCAQMD does not consider emissions from the Project's emissions to add significantly to any cumulative impact. Furthermore, it should be noted that the proposed Project would improve traffic flaw, reduce idling, and encompass the same amount of road ,capacity for with the existing lane configuration. As such, the Project would continue to result in a beneficial impact. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FHISIEIR Mitigation Measures H-1 through H-3 and H-5 through H-7• Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. a Expose sensitive receptors to substw9al pollutant concenlradons? A project could have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations if it would cause or contribute substantially to elevated pollutant concentration levels or place the project in an area with elevated pollutant concentrations. An evaluation of air pollutant emissions as it affects Iocal sensitive receptors has been conducted for both the construction and operations phases of the Project_ As per the 1990 FEISIEIR, it was determined that sensitive receptors in the vicinity appeared to experience carbon monoxide levels that exceeded state and federal standards. Additionally, it was found that under future conditions with the Bristol Street Widening Project, sensitive land uses adjacent to the intersections analyzed reduced carbon monoxide levels to Iess than significant once the sensitive receptors were setback far enough from the intersections. It was also noted that the carbon monoxide concentrations were only analyzed during "worst case' conditions and did not reflect concentrations which were more likely to occur which would be less than significant compared to what was observed. The Project configuration, which was also analyzed as part of the 1990 FEISIEIR, would serve to increase traffic flow through the intersection, but would not increase the overall road capacity compared to the 1990 FE[SIEIR, and would not result in an increase in the pollutant concentrations near sensitive receptors, as previously analyzed the 1990 FEISIEIR. In addition, as determined in the 1990 FEISIEIR, the proposed modifications would increase traffic flow and reduce traffic idling, which would decrease vehicle emissions. Implementation of the proposed Projectwould not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FE[SIEIR. Final I December 2017 3-5 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures:. Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures H-1 through H 3 and H-5 through H-1. Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ofpeople? Construction activities associated with the proposed Project may generate detectable odors from heavy-duty construction equipment and exhaust- Odors associated with diesel and gasoline fumes are transitory in nature and would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The impacts from these odors would be short-term, would cease upon Project completion, and are not anticipated to be significant. Implementation of the proposed Projectwould not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section corresponds with the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and A&igation Measures, Subsection E, Sirecmabed Alociifacation. Would the project: uV Have a substantial adverse effecX. either dwettiy or through habitat modifications, on any species idenWf led as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S Fish and Wr7dife Service? The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. No sensitive natural habitat or special -status species exist on or in the vicinity of the proposed Project Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEISlEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natriral community identf led in local or regional plans, policies, regul&ons or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Refer to Response 3.4(a). No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are identified in the Project vicinity. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (hw1u&W, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool coastal, etc.) through direct removd filling hydrological interruption, or other means? Refer to Response 3.4(a). No federally protected wetlands are identified in the Project area or vicinity. The proposed Project is located within a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Final I December 2017 3-7 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures- No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required 14 Interfere substandally with the movement of any native resident or migratoryfrsh or iWdUye species or wiA established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? As the proposed Project is located within a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana, the Project would not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites, as none are located within the Project area. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. ej Conflict withany local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, stack as a tree preservationpolicy or ordinance? The proposed Project may result in the removal of existing landscaping, including trees. As such, removal or planting of trees is required to comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 33, Article VII, Regulation ofthe planting, A,"ntenance, a Removal of Trees. With compliance with the City's Municipal Code, the proposed Project would not conflict with the City's tree ordinance Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. ,) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or odxer approved local regional; or state habitat conservation plan? The Project site is not located within a habitat conservation plan. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES This section corresponds with the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection T, Cultural Resources. Would the project. a) Cause a substantial a&erse change in the significance of a hutorrcal resource as de(m- ed in §15a64.5? No structure modification would result with implementation of the Project. Furthermore, the proposed Project would only require limited depths of excavations (maximum depth of 10 feet). Although the majority of excavation is anticipated to occur in non-native fill materials, should unknown potential historical resources be uncovered, implementation of mitigation measure T-1 in the previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR would reduce irnp acts to less than significant levels. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Final I December 2017 3-8 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: T-1 If potential archaeological resources are encountered during grading, all work will be halted in that particular location until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the recovered materials. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b} Cause a suhstwtial adverse change In the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § I5064.5? Due to the limited area of disturbance, within an existing developed and urban area, and limited depth of proposed excavations, the potential to uncover archaeological resources is considered low. The proposed Project would not result in archaeological impacts greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FE[S/ELR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures T-1. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 0 Directly or ifadkeelly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologLe feature? As documented in Chapter VI, Resources Elemeig, of the County of Orange General Plan, the Project site is not located in an area of paleontological sensitivity. Soils occurring in the Project area are San Emigdio,s Typically, these deposits are less than 10,000 years old, and not likely to contain important fossils.9 No greater impacts to paleontological resources than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR would result from Project implementation. Certified 1990 FEIS(E]IR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. d) Disturb airy human remains, rnclu4ng those interred outside of dedleated cemeteries? The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. Cathedral Memorial Gardens is located approximately 2 miles north-west of the Project site. In the event that human remains are uncovered during grading or excavation, contractors are required to comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and CPRC Section 2098.98. The County Coroner and, in the event that the remains are Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission would be notified and, in turn, would notify those persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased for appropriate disposition of the remains. The proposed Project would not result in an impact to human remains greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section corresponds with the fallowing 1990 FEIS(EIR, Section IV, Envirorunental Consequences and MfigadonMetasures, subsections: • Subsection A, Laracforrn 1llfodicafion; • Subsection B, Scisinic Hazards; x United States Department of Agriculture, Web Foal 54rwy, https:Jlwebsoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/AppVebsoil Survey.aspx, accessed August 2, 2017. 9 Ibid Final I December 2017 3-9 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-E883 ■ Subsection C,Erosion lmpacts, and ■ Subsection F, Water Quality. Would the project: u} Expose people or sinwtures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss injurj; or death involving: ij Rupture of a known earthquake fault; as delineated on the most recentAlquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologistfor the area or based on other substantial evidence of a. known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology 4eeial Publication 42. The City of Santa Ana is not included in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map1°. The Project site is not underlain by an active fault. The closest faults are the El Modeno Fault, approximately eight miles to the northeast and the Newport Inglewood Fault approximately 15 miles to the southwest. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISXIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. R) Mrong seismic ground shakng? The El Modeno fault is the closest fault to the Project site and is the most likely source of ground shaking imp acts i The Project proposes intersection improvements and would not expose people or structures to adverse ground shaking impact The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. iv Seisms -re late dgroundfaiksre, including liquefaction? According to the City's General Plan, the Project site is identified as having high -medium liquefaction potential. However, the Project does not propose any new habitable structures. Implementation of 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure B-2,. to replace surface Ievel structures with structures that have extensive subsurface footings (such as traffic signals) that reach stable material would reduce any structural impacts from ground failure to less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FE[SIE[R. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures- B-2 Consideration will be given to installing and replacing surface level structures such as street lights, traffic signals and utility poles, with structures that have extensive subsurface footings that reach stable material. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. iv} Landslides? The proposed Project site is generally flat and does not contain any significant slopes. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISO R. 1° City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Aria General flan, adopted September 1982, as amended. ii California Geological Survey, Fault Activity Map of California; http://maps.croservafon.ca.gov/cgs/fanV App/index.html, acc ess ed August 3, 2017. Final I December 2017 3-10 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-E883 Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures- No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicablew Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Result in substantial soil erosion. or the loss of topsoil? Exposure of barren rock and soil surfaces during construction would result in soil erosion. However, considering the slight gradient, the anticipated erosion impact would he nominal. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISfEIR Mitigation Measures: C-2 Straw or other suitable materials will be placed. over uncovered soils, as needed, during street construction activities. This would reduce the amount of erosion. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. cj Be located on ageologic unit or soil that is unstable, or 1hid would become unstable as a result of the prgjec� and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? The 1990 FEISIEIR indicated that there are no instances of undisturbed, natural soils. The Project site located in an area identified as having high to medium subsidence for liquefaction. However, the Project area is fully developed with urban uses within the .City of Santa Ana and the proposed Project would be constructed in accordance with the standards of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Implementation of 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measure B-2, to replace surface level structures with structures that have extensive subsurface footings that reach stable material would reduce any structural impacts from ground failure to less than significant. The proposed Project would not create greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIIIR Mitigation Measure B-2. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Corte (1994), creating substantial risks to Aye or property? The proposed Project would not include construction of any habitable structures nor would the Project increase the number of persons at the Project site, Thus, the proposed Project would not create substantial risks to life or property and the proposed Project would not create greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure B-2. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Have soffs incapable of adequately suppon7ing the use of septic tanks or alterneiive nuste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The proposed Project would not generate any sewage or wastewater and would not require installation of any septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems. No impacts are anticipated in this regard and the proposed Project would not create greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIRMitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIRmitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. Final I December 2017 3-11 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The previously approved 1990 FEISIEIR did not include evaluation for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, as such an analysis was not required in the CEQA guidelines at the time the 1990 FEISIEIR was prepared. On September 6, 1990, the City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency certified the 1990 FEISIEIR that analyzed the potential impacts associated with the Bristol Street Widening Project, which focused on improvements that would result in proposed widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, in the City of Santa Ana. Although this previous environmental document did not include a GHG analysis, a supplemental environmental analysis of GHG impacts cannot be required absent new information on that front. (Citizens,for Responsible Equitable Environrnental Development [CREED] v. City of ,Saga Diego, [2011] 196 CaI.App.4th 515, 531.) Information on the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on climate was known long before the City approved the 1990 FEISIEIR. (Id) Thus, the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on climate could have been raised in 1990 when the City considered the FEISIECR. A challenge to a FEISIEIR must be brought within 30 days of the lead agency's notice of approval. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21167[b].) Under Public Resources Code section 21166(c), an agency may not require a supplemental environmental review unless new information, which was not known and could not have been known atthe time the FEISIEIR was approved, becomes available After a project has been subjected to environmental review, the statutory presumption flips in favor of the project proponent and against further review. (Moss v. County of Humbolch [2008] 162 Cal.App.4th 1041, 1049-1050.) "`[S]ectim 21166 comes into play precisely because in-depth review has already occurred [and] the time for challenging the sufficiency of the original EIR has long since expired."' (Icl , 1050.) There is no competent evidence of new information of severe impact, and thus the City may rely on an addendum. Accordingly, the City finds that GHG impacts and climate change are not "new information" under Public Resources Code Section 21166. Would Me project: a) Generate greenhouse gar emissions, either directly or indirectly, ffix may have a *n#k- ant import on the environment? GHG were not evaluated in the 1990 FEISIEIR.. Construction activities would consume fuel and result in the generation of GHG emissions. Construction of the Project is anticipated to occur over a one-year period. Construction -related GHG emissions would cease upon completion of the Project. Due to the length of construction activities, GHG emissions associated with construction activities are anticipated to be minimal. Because construction emissions are not substantial and would cease after completion of construction, GHG emissions would not be significant. Furthermore; the Project proposes acquiring additional ROW from what was originally analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/E[R. The additional ROW would not change the roadway capacity or over all Iane configuration from what was analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. As the Project involves roadway improvements and not a trip generating [and. use, only carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from mobile -sources are applicable. Similar to the other criteria pollutants, the highest emissions would occur between 0 to 10 Wailes per hour (mph) and 50 mph and above. The proposed Project would improve traffic flow and reduce idling. Because the Project would improve traffic flow within the Project area, the Project would result in reduced CO2 emissions. Modifications involving additional ROW would not result in a change to the road capacity, lane configuration, and impacts that were identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR. GHG emissions would be nominal in relation to the global scale of GHG emissions, and there is no evidence that mitigation is necessary for the Project modifications to further demonstrate compliance with the GHG reduction targets of Assembly Bill 32 and Senate Bill 32. Consequently, GHG emissions associated with the Project would be less than significant. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicably Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Final I December 2017 3-12 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1-E883 bj Conflict wdh an arpplicable plan, policy or reguia don adapted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? In December.2015, the City of Santa Ana adopted the Climate Action Plan (CAP) as a commitment to improving. quality of life by reducing carbon pollution and energy use, both from its own operations and from the community as a whole. To develop this CAP, an inventory was conducted to determine baseline GHG emissions from the community and from municipal operations for calendar year 2008. A forecast was made of business -as -usual emissions in the absence of any emissions reduction actions. This forecast was then adjusted to account for the emissions reduction expected from statewide policies and from actions that have already been taken by the City since the baseline inventory. Based on community input, suggestions from City staff, analysis of other communities' climate action plans, and consultant recommendations, a list of measures to reduce emissions was developed. Reaching the emissions reduction goals will require residents, businesses, and City government to work together. The result will be reduced traffic congestion, improved air quality, lower energy use and cost, and improved quality of life for the entire community. The fallowing measures from the CAP are applicable to the proposed Project: ■ Traffic Signal Synchronization Program: Corridors with synchronized and coordinated traffic signals tend to have shorter travel times, Iess delay, and reduced congestion. These factors combine reduced fuel usage and emissions. Improvements of intersection operations would help achieve City reduction goals by reducing idling emissions, decreasing congestion and improving traffic flow. ■ Design Guidelines for Internal Pedestrian Connectivity: Internal pedestrian connections such as a sidewalk within a site are an important factor in facilitating non -automotive travel. The level of connectivity relates to the ability to travel within the site to other locations without having to use vehicles or an external roadway networkwhich decrease emissions, As noted above, the Project would widen the Bristol Street ROW to accommodate a planned roadway/intersection improvement. The Project would improve tragic flow, reduce idling emissions, thereby reducing GHG emissions. The proposed Project would not conflict with the GAP because it would not increase GHG emissions. The Project would also implement the appliance CAP measures noted above and would further decrease emissions through traffic signal synchronization and the design of an internal pedestrian sidewalk. The Project modifications would not conflict with CAP reduction targets. Additionally, the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable plans, policy, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG. The proposed Project would result in improved traffic flow, reduced vehicle idling times, and congestion, Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in new impacts pertaining to GHG emissions. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required, 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS This section corresponds with. the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and A&tigation Akasures, Subsection V, Construction Impacts, and Subsection X, hazardous Materials. Would fim project: a j Create a s4wricant hazard to the pubiie or the environment through the roudhe transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? The proposed intersection improvements would require relocation of curb/gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, and both public and private utilities (including the existing traffic signal). Any removal of roadway pavement striping will be required to be surveyed for lead -based paint prior to removal, in compliance with the applicable local, state, and federal regulations administered through the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health. Final I December 2017 3-13 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 No other routine transport, use,. or disposal of hazardous materials is anticipated as a result of the proposed Project. Thus, compliance with existing regulations would ensure that impacts are not greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. L) Greale a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable up yet and accidenteonditions involving the release ofhazardous materials into the environment? As listed in Table 1, Proposed Property Acquisition a total of three Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) (002-261- 06, -29, and -30) would be partially acquired as a result of the proposed intersection improvements; refer to Exhibit 5 Proposed Right-oL- MaAcm&ition. All proposed areas of acquisition include vacantportions of commercial and multi -family residential properties. These vacant areas consist of bare soils, paving/asphalt, or ornamental landscaping. Based on information maintained by the State Water- Resources Control Board (SWRCB), APN 002- 261-06 (currently a vacant disturbed property located at 2702 N. Bristol Street) was historically Chevron Service Station #9-8787.11 On January 28, 1999, three 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks (UM) and one 1,000-gallon used oil UST were removed from the property. According to the SWRCB, a release from the USTs, clarifier, sump, and degreaser were reported during tank removal. Site characterization of potential contaminates was completed and, based on groundwater monitoring, determined that only the soil was affected above regulatory thresholds. Contaminated soils were excavated. Based on a case closure letter issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), dated October 22, 2001, completion of the site investigation, remedial action, and groundwater monitoring was completed.13 No further action related to the reported release is required based on the current land use. According to the 1990 FEISIEIR, ROW impacts to businesses that may generate hazardous waste or sites that contain underground storage tanks will occur with implementation of the preferred alternative. The 1990 FEISIEIR acknowledged that it is likely that implementation of the preferred alternative would require the removal of USTs or aboveground storage tanks, or modifications to sites that have historically been handling, processing, or storing hazardous materials. Such activities have the potential to release hazardous wastes into the air or into the ground, but standard construction practices, which would involve careful coordination of design plans or prior notification of construction activity, are expected to minimize these risks and to minimize any disruptions. Thus, compliance with existing regulations and the 1990 FEIS/ECR mitigation measures would ensure that impacts are not -greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISfEIR Mitigation Measures: X-1 The City of Santa Ana's Public Works Director will coordinate closely with all agencies and companies which maintain underground or at -grade utility or energy facilities within the areas to be disturbed by project construction activities. Preliminary and final design plans will be made available to such agencies forreview and comment. At least 48 hours priorto commencement of any excavation activities, the City will contact the Underground Service Alert to notify the affected utility/energy purveyors who can place their personnel at the excavation site to assist in the location of underground facilities during the exploratory digging immediately preceding excavation. In this manner, the risk of line rupture to natural gas, petroleum, and sewer facilities, which might release hazardous substances and odors in to the air, can be minimized. X-2 Should any unidentified substances, odors, leaking underground tanks, or other mysterious and potentially hazardous materials be encountered during project construction, work in that area will be halted and the Santa Ana Fire Department's Hazardous Materials Team will be contacted to evaluate the materials and to define appropriate remedial measures. 12 State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker, http:llgeotrackei.waterboards.ca.govl, accessed July 24, 2017. 3 rbid Final I December 2017 3-14 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM - Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 X-3 The removal of underground storage tanks will be in accordance with all applicable regulations. For any service stations that will be partially acquired or displaced, the City will request that the owners remove the underground gasoline tanks prior to property acquisition. If the owners do not remove the underground tanks, the City will include the following statement in the right-of-way agreement: "It is understood the property being acquired in this transaction may contain hazardous waste which must be removed or otherwise treated under state or federal Law to protect the public health. If hazardous waste is found to exist on the property, the State may exercise its right to bring an action, if necessary, to recover clean-up costs from the grantors or any others who are ultimately determined to have responsibility for the hazardous waste condition of the property" Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c] Emd hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substanees, or "W"e n*hbt one -quarter mile of an exftfitg or proposed school? The schools closest to the Project site are Santiago Elementary School (located approximately 0.46 mile south at 2212 N. Baker Street, Santa Ana) and Riverdale EIementary School (located approximately 0.60 mile west at 13222 Lewis Street, Garden Grove). Thus, no schools are located within one -quarter mile of the Project site and impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. dj Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and as a result would it create a sign (rcaitt hazard to the public or the environment? The Project site includes a former service station where gasoline was reported to have contaminated the soil; the site completed site remediation through appropriate state and local agency standards as required. To that end, the RWQCB issued a case closure letter dated October 22,. 2001 stating that no further action was required for the site. As discussed in Response 3.8(b), compliance with existing regulations and mitigation measures from the 1990 FEISIEIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures X-1 through X-3. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e} For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted witftin twn miles of a public airport or public use airpor4 would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The Project site is not within an airport Iand use plan. The closest airport to the site is John Wayne — Orange County Airport, located approximately 5.9 miles southeast of the Project site. The proposed Project would not introduce any new risks or increase risks associated with the Project. Impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIETR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. Final I December 2017 3-15 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 fj For a project within the vicinity of aprivate airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working ut the project area? The Project site is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not create any safety hazard. The proposed Project would not create additional significant impact. Impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIWIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable - Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. g} Impair implementation of or phyxically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? During construction, the disruption of traffic and access along Bristol Street and Memory Iane would temporarily affect the mobility of emergency vehicles. However, provisions would be made for interim access through the Project corridor and to adjoining properties; traffic control plans would be prepared detailing provisions for vehicular movement and access through the Project corridor during construction. Advance warning and information signs would be used to inform motorists during the construction process. It is expected that two-way travel would be maintained along Bristol Street during construction. Although the proposed Project may interfere with an emergency evacuation plan, itwould be short term during construction and mobility would improve once the Project is completed. Compliance with mitigation measures from the 1990 FEIS/EIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEWEIR Mitigation Measures: V-10 Traffic control plans will be prepared prior to each phase of construction. All traffic warning and control devices should comply to the provisions of the State of California Manual of Traffic Controls. V-12 Thep olice and fire departments will benotified of construction at least one (1) month in advance, as to the particulars of the project (i.e., project time schedule, and areas to be disrupted, etc.). This action would give the police and fire departments sufficient time to notify its personnel of any significant impediments to traffic. V-13 The City will notify the police department at least 48 hours in advance of any turning changes. A minimum three (3) signs are required for each indicated change and/or prevention of movement. V-16 If feasible, construction activities and lane closures will occur primarily during non=peak driving periods. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. ih) Fxpose people or structures to a srgnyw- ant risk of loss, injury or death involving nadland fires, including where wilrilauds are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildllrnds? The proposed Project is located in a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. There are no wildlands in the Project vicinity and no new significant impacts would result with Project implementation. Impacts in this regard would not begreater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. Final I December 2017 3-16 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section corresponds with the following 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and AfftigaiionMeasures, subsections: ■ Subsection C, Erosion Impacts; • Subsection D, F'loodplcrklMoodwayEncroachment- and • Subsection F, Water Quality. WOul(i the project. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requrremenfi? Under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act �CWA� the EPA has .established regulations under the NPDES program to control direct storm water discharges. Should 1.0 acre or more of site disturbance occur, those activities would be subject to the NPDES program for the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed Project would only impact approximately 0.39 acres, which is less than the 1.0-acre threshold. Thus, the Project would not be subject to NPDES requirements, as potential waste discharge would be nominal. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with the 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure C-2, involving the placement of straw or other suitable materials over uncovered soils, as needed, during street construction activities, further reducing the amount of erosion occurring at the Project site. Regarding operations, the Project would not increase the capacity of the roadway or the number of vehicles using the Project area. Therefore, impacts to water quality would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure C-2. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or utaerfere substandally wdh groundwater recharge such that there would be a stet deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support exisibW laud uses or planned usesfor whichpermits have been granter# ? The proposed Project would not result in increased water consumption and would not deplete groundwater supplies. No impact to groundwater supplies would result from the proposed Project. Impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIELR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c) ,Subsiautially alter the existffig drainage pattern of the site or area including through the alteration of the course of a scream or river, in a manner that "uld result rsi substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site ? The proposed Project would only nominally increase the paved/impervious areas of the Project site. This nominal increase would not result in a substantial increase in erosion or siltation on- or off -site. Further, implementation of 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure C-2 would reduce any potential erosion/siltation impacts during construction. Thus, impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure C-2 Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. Final I December 2017 3-17 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 to Substantially alter the exisMW drainage pattern of the site or area bw a ft borough the alteration. of doe course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amouni of surface rungjyIn a manner that would result in,)'looding on- or off -site? Currently, the Project site only includes curb and no catch basin is present. As a result, seasonal ponding does occur along this portion of Bristol Street The proposed Project would result in a nominal increase in impervious ground surfaces. However, development of the Project would result in the relocation of the existing curb features at the Project site. Thus, implementation of the proposed Projectwould not result in a substantial increase compared to the existing condition. Further, Project development -may include extension of the existing storm water pipeline system (located on the eastern side of Bristol Street) through a new lateral connection and new catch basin at the Project site. These improvements, if constructed, would result in a reduction of existing flooding and would be a beneficial impact. Thus, impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are requited. e) Greate or conbibute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources o f pollrated runq,o"? Refer to Response 3.9(a). Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. f) Otherwise subsiandally degrade water quality? Refer to Response 3.9(a). Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 9) Place housing wWdn a 1 bO-yearflood hazard area as mapped on afederal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Date Map or other flood hazard delineation map? The Project site is located outside of the 100 year flood zone.14 Further, the proposed Project would not construct any housing. Therefore, no impact would result from the proposed Project in this regard. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. h) 17we within a 100yearflood hazard areas&uetures which would impede or redireetflood flows? Refer to Response 3.9(g). Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. to Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Flood Map ,Service Center, https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search? AddressQuery=memory%2alane%2C%26santa%2Oana#lsearchresultsanchor, accessed August 3,2017. Final I December 2017 3-18 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 1 -E883 i) Expose people or sft7wtures to a sign fcani risk of loss, injury or death involvft floodWg, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dove ? The proposed Project does not involve the construction of new habitable structures or people at the Project site, Therefore, the Project would not expose people or habitable structures to a significant flooding risk beyond that which already exists. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR.. Certified 1990 FEISJEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISlEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. j} Iruandadion by sewhe, tsunami, or mudflow? The Project site is located approximately 15 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean; therefore, the likelihood of tsunami impacting the site is minimal. The Project site and vicinity are highly urbanized and there are no nearby water bodies or unusual slopes or geologic features in the area. No impacts involving seiche, tsunami, or mudflow are anticipated. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measure: No additional mitigation measures are required 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING This section corresponds with the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection A, Iandform Ab6fif cation. Would the project: a) Physically divide art established community? The proposed Project involves the widening of the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane; the proposed Project would not divide an established community. Although the proposed widening of Bristol Street within the Project limits wouId result in partial acquisition of existing properties, the Project would not create a physical barrier to, or separate, a community. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Conflict wmdt arty applicable land ire plait, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plum, spec}rc plait, local coastal program, or Z onmg ordinance) adoptedfor the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? According to the City gfSantaAna General Plan (General Plan), the Project area is designated General Commercial (GC) and Low Density Residential (LDR-7). The zoning designation of properties within the Project area are Specific Development (SD27) which is developed as the Portofino Apartments and Community Commercial (Cl) which allows for retail and service uses.. The proposed Project would not result in changes to the land use designation ofthe acquired parcels. The proposed Project is in compliance with the existing designations and would not create a new conflict. It is acknowledged that due to Building setback requirements, the Project would require approval from the City Manager for landscape strip Exceptions for building setbacks per Municipal Code Section 41-781, With City Manager approval, the Project would be consistent with the Municipal Code requirements. No significant impacts would result and impacts would lie similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Final I December 2017 3-19 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures- No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. cj Conflict M& any applicable habitat conservation plan or naArral community conservatiernplmn? The Project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan, and is located within a highly -urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. The proposed Project would not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community. No impact is anticipated. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicably Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES This section corresponds with the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and AAtigation Measures, Subsection W, Consumption of Renewable and Non -Renewable Resources. Would the project: Result in the loss of avaUabr7ity of a known mineral resource of value to the region and the residents of the state? The Project site is currently developed and does not contain any areas that are utilized for the extraction of ruineraI resources. Furthermore, the proposed Project would not involve excavation that would likely identify previously unidentified mineral resources. No impact to mineral resources would result from the proposed Project. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIE(R. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable; Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. h) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a loealgeneral plan, spec frc plan or other land use plan.? The Project site is currently developed and is not delineated as a mineral resources recovery site by the City's General Plan. Implementation of the proposed Project: would have no impact on the mineral resources and no mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would. not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.12 NOISE This section corresponds with the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Afitigation Akasures, Subsection I, Noise, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts. Would the project result DL a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plats or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Final I December 2017 3-20 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1 -6883 The proposed Project involves widening the west side of Bristol Street, north of the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane, in an urbanized area of multi- and single-family residential uses, commercial uses, and vacant land. The widening of the proposed ROW from 100 feet to 111 feet will not substantially change the noise levels which were analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Changes to traffic noise impacts typically occur when there is a substantial horizontal alteration to the roadway. The CaItraiis Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol guidance per federal regulations (23 CFR 772) defines a substantial horizontal alteration as a project that halves the distance between the traffic noise source and the closest receptor between the existing condition to the future build condition. The existing distance from the ROW to the closest receptor is approximately 30 feet. When adding the additional 11 feet to the ROW, this is less than half of the distance which means thatthe Project does not cause a substantial horizontal alteration. The Proposed Project modifications would not result in any new long-term mobile and stationary noise impacts. Only nominal changes to grading or construction activities would occur. No increases to road vehicle capacity would occur. No new impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIIIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: I-1 Constriction activities will take place only during the hours specified in the City of Santa Ana Noise Control Ordinance to reduce noise impacts during more sensitive time periods. I-2 All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, operated within 1,000 feet of a dwelling shalI be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems. 1-3 Stationary equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers such as residential areas. I-4 Stockpiling and vehicle staging areas shall be Iocated as far as practical from occupied dwellings. I-5 Every effort will be made to create the greatest distance between noise sources and receptors during construction. I-6 The noisiest construction operations will be arranged to occur' together in the constriction program to avoid continuing periods ofgreater annoyance. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. bj Exposure of persons to or generairan of excessive groundborne vibrarhon or groundborne noise levels? Refer to Response 3.12(a). During Project construction, noise associated with construction may intermittently dominate the noise environment in the immediate area of construction. No additional adverse noise impacts from construction are anticipated as construction would comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, which limits construction noise to the least noise sensitive portions of the day. Construction equipment would be properly fitted and maintained according to the manufacturer's specifications. Furthermore, construction noise would be short- term, temporary, and cease upon completion of the proposed Project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR with implementation of mitigation measures and would not be greater than what was previously analyzed. The proposed widening of Bristol Street and ROW acquisition just north of Memory Lane would involve additional ROW take at adjoining properties in order to accommodate the third southbound through lane (considered in the 1990 FEISIEIR). These changes would be nominal and would result in similar noise levels as the 1990 FEISIEIR, which would be below significant Ievels. The Proposed Project modifications would not result in any new long- term mobile and stationary noise impacts. No changes to grading or construction activities would occur. No increases to road vehicle capacity or lane configurations would occur. No new impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required. Impacts would not be .greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Final I December 2017 3-21 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures- No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicablew Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing wvUhaut the project? Refer to Responses 3.12(a) and 3.12(b). Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation treasures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. A substantial temporary or periodic increase m ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing ntitithout the project? Refer to Response 3.12(a), for discussion regarding temporary noise impacts associated with Project construction. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/IM Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures I-1 through I-6. Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where ,such a plan has not been adopted n t & two miles of a public airpoa or public use asrpos4 would the project expose people residing or ",orking in the project area to excessive noise levels? The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan. The nearest airport is the John Wayne — Orange County Airport, located approximately 5.9 miles from the proposed Project. No impacts would occur. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. 0 For a project wiWd a the vicisa* of a private airstr4y. wvauld the project expose people residing or workWg in the project area to excessive noise levels? Refer to Response 3.12(e). The proposed Project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING This section corresponds with the following 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Utigation Measures, subsections: • Subsection L, Population; ■ Subsection M, Housing Displacement, ■ Subsection N, Business Displacement; ■ Subsection C, Impacts on Neighborhood Character and Minority Groups; and Subsection R, Effici on Assessed Property Values Final I December 2017 3-22 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 Would the project: aj Induce substantial population grox#h in an area either directly {for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly {for example, through extension of roadsor other infrarsbucture) ? The proposed Project involves the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to widen Bristol Street, located within a highly urbanized and built -out area. The proposed Project is designed to accommodate the existing and future traffic volume and would not create new trips. The proposed Project would not result in additional impacts. Impacts would not begreater than that -previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/E[R. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. bj Displace subst n dal numbers of existing housing, necessdatiug the construction of replacement housing elsewhere ? A total of three properties would: be partially acquired as a result of the proposed widening of Bristol Street. All proposed areas of acquisition include vacant portions of commercial and multi -family residential properties. These vacant areas consist of paving/asphalt or ornamental landscaping. The acquisitions would comply with policies pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as implemented by the City of Santa Ana. No removal of housing would occur. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. cj Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Refer to Response 3.13(b). Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES This section corresponds with the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and IvAtigation Akasures, Subsection P, Impacts on Community Facilities, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental faegWes, need far new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of ni<tich. couldcause sign cant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable serve ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: ij Fire Protection? The proposed Project includes intersection improvements and no increase in demand for fire protection services would occur with implementation of the proposed Project: Furthermore, the proposed Project would result in positive impacts as a result of greater congestion relief and increased mobility in the vicinity for motor vehicles including ernergency vehicles. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Final I December 2017 3-23 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures- No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. bj Ponce Protection? Refer to Response 3.14(a)(i). The proposed Project would not result in the need or increase the demand for police services in the area. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) .Schools? The proposed Project does not involve any new development and no new population would result. Therefore, no schools or school services would be impacted by the proposed Projer-t Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. 40 Parks? The proposed Project does not involve any new development and no new population would result. There are no parks within the Project limits, and no needs for additional park services would occur as a result of the proposed Project. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures arerequired. e) Other publicfixgWes? The proposed Project does not involve any new,development and no new population would. result Therefore, the Project would not generate demands for other public facilities. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.15 RECREATION This section corresponds with the I990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, -Environmental Consequences and Midpation Akasnres, Subsection P, Impact on -Recreational Facilities. uj Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational fac&ftes such that substafthal physical deterioration of the faeday would occur or be accelerated? The proposed Project involves the widening of Bristol Street, just north of Memory Lane, to accommodate a third southbound through lane within a highly urbanized and Built -out area in the City, The widening of Bristol Street would not induce growth, nor create demand for recreation -related services. Furthermore,. the proposed Project Final I December 2017 3-24 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 would not result in the physical deterioration of recreational facilities. No mitigation measures are required with regards to recreational resources, Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expwWon of recreaWnalfaocilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Refer to Response 3.15(a). The proposed Project does not include, nor would it require, construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse physical impact on the environment would occur from such facilities as a result of the proposed Project No mitigation measures are required. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC This section corresponds with the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection U,.Impacts to Tramportation Facilities, and Subsection V, Construetion Impacts. Would the project. aj Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit aid non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable plans, ordinances and policies establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system as described in the 1990 FEISIEIR. The widening of Bristol Street was designated in the Orange County Master Plan, and was recommended in the Bristol Street Corridor Study — Find Report, prepared by Mohle, Grover & Associates, dated 1983. It was also recommended in the Arterial Highway Element — Santa Ana Element — Santa Ana Triyuportation Corridor State II Alternative Analysis, prepared by Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc., dated 1983. The proposed Project is also consistent with the recommendation found in the Intercity liaison Committee — Five -Year Ranportation Study Updcde to 1990, prepared by Basmaciyan-Darnell, Inc., dated 1985. Furthermore, the proposed Project would improve traffic operations through the Project corridor. Based on traffic count data provided as part of the Measure A42 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program Call for Projects, prepared by the City of Santa Ana, for the .grange County Transportation Authority, dated. October 20, 2016, the existing Level of Service (LOS) at the Bristol Street/Memory Lane intersection is LOS C in the AM Peak Hour and a LOS. E during the PM Peak Hour. Upon completion Qf the proposed Project, the Peak Hour LOS at this intersection would be improved ton LOS B in the AM Peak Hour and a LOS D in the PM Peak Hour. Therefore, the Project would result in an overall beneficial impact pertaining to traffic and would not -be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certifed 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. bj Conflict with im applicable congestion manVement program, including, but not limited to level of service stwulamds and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congesdon management Weneyfor designated roads or highways? Final I December 2017 3-25 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 According to the 2015 Orange County Congestion Alaaagement Program, prepared by the Orange County Transportation Authority, dated November 2015, the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane is not a CMP intersection, nor is this intersection located along a CMP Highway System. Further, as discussed in Response 3,16(a), the proposed Project would result in an improvement to both the AM and PM Peak Hour LOS. As the proposed Project would not increase the capacity of the roadway network, the Project would not result in greater impacts than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIVEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c) Result in a change in air trgrw patterns, including either an increase in triew- levels or a change in loeo on that results in substantial safety risks? The closest airport to the site is John Wayne — Orange County Airport, located approximately 5.9 miles southeast of the Project site; the proposed Projeet would have no impact on air traffic patterns. The proposed Project would not introduce any new risks or increase risks. Impacts would not be.greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FE[SIE[R. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 14 Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompalihle uses (e.g., farm. equipmeo ? The proposed Project would improve the traffic flow at the Bristol Street and Memory Lane intersection and would not create any sharp curves or other incompatible uses. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/E[R. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? The proposed Project would improve traffic operations along Bristol Street in the long-term. During the construction phase traffic flow along Bristol Street within the Project limits could be temporarily affected, including the mobility of emergency vehicles; however, access, including two --way travel would be maintained through the Project corridor during construction. Traffic control plans would be prepared prior to construction to facilitate traffic movement through the Project corridor during construction Although the proposed Project may interfere with emergency access in the short-term, it would improve emergency access once the Project is completed. Implementation of 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures V-10, V-12, V-13 and V-16 would reduce impacts associated with inadequate emergency access to a Iess than significant Ievel. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Referto.1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures V-10, V=12, V-13, and V-16. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. f) Conflict WM adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transi4 bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? The proposed Project would not conflict with any altemative transportation plan and would increase safety associated with improvements to the traffic operations through the Project area. The proposed Project would not Final I December 2017 3-26 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 result in impacts greater than as described in the 1990 FEIS/EIR- Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR Certified 1990 FFIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation Treasures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.17 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES As of July 1, 2015, California Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) was enacted and expanded CEQA by establishing a formal consultation process for California tribes within the CEQA process. The bill specifies that any project may affect or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource would require a lead agency to "begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditional and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project" Section 21.074 of AB 52 also defines a new category of resources under CEQA called tribal cultural resources. Tribal cultural resources are defined as "sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe' and is either listed on or eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or a local historic register, or if the lead agency chooses to treat the resource as a tribal cultural resource. Notwithstanding, AB 52 applies to all new applications deemed complete on or after July 1; 2015. Thus, as the proposed improvements are an Amendment to the existing Bristol Street Widening Project, and not a new Application, AB 52 does not apply to this Project On February 19, 2016, the California Natural Resources Agency proposed to adopt and amend regulations as part of AB 52 implementing Title 14, Division S Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations, CEQA Guidelines, to include consideration of impacts to tribal cultural resources pursuant to GoverMent Code Section 11346.6. On September 27, 2016, the California Office of Administrative Law approved the amendments to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and these amendments are addressed within this Addendum. a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the signjfrcance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographicaffy dermed in terms of the size and scope of the lmtdseape, sacred place, or object Kith cultural value to a Cakfbrnia 1Vative American tribe, and that is: 0 Listed or ekgible for lisMV in the C'akfornia Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defrned in Public Resources Code section 5020.1 (k), or According to the City of Santa Ana, no Native American -related historical resources are present within the Project vicinity.15 Based on the 1990 FEIS/E[R, no historical or archaeological resources were identified in the Project vicinity. During public noticing period for the Bristol Street Widening Project, a better received from the Office of Historic Preservation indicated that the Bristol Widening Project would not affect historic properties. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in .greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: T-1 If potential archeological resources are encountered during grading, all work will be halted in that particular location until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the recovered materials. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 's City of Santa Asia, -Fraperty lnfarm atkw %arch, http://www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us/property-info/, accessed August 17, 201'. Final I December 2017 3-27 Environmental Consequences ENVIRDNMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM F Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements —Project No. 17 E883 A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be siguffk- ant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision {c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria setfornth in subdivision (e) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a CWornia Native American W e. The Project is not subject to AB 52 and did not undergo the AB 52 Consultation Process. Notwithstanding, the 1990 FEISIEIR, no historical or archaeological resources were identified in the Project vicinity pertaining to Native American resources. Further, during public noticing periods, letters received from the Office of Historic Preservation indicated that the Bristol Widening Project would not affect historic properties. No correspondence from any tribes were received during the 1990 FEISIEIR. No new impacts have been identified. Should any unknown tribal cultural resources be uncovered during grading/site disturbance activities, the Project would be required to Comply with the 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure T-1. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measure T-1 Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This section corresponds with the 1990 FEISIEIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation A�ka vurav, Subsection S, Effict on Utilities, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts. wouid the project. o} Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional lVater duality Control Board? The proposed Project entails intersection improvements; such improvements would. not result in the generation of wastewater. No new significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would not begreater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. bj Require or result in the consh7wtion of new water or wastewater treahnentfacilities or expansion of exAtWgfaae9ities, the conistnwdon of Wikh could cause significant environmental effecis? The proposed Project would not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. No new significant impact is anticipated. Implementation of 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures V-14 and V-17 would reduce impacts to less than significant. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/F.tR- Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures- V-14 Project plans and construction activities will be closely coordinated with local utility purveyors in order to make the necessary arrangements for the relocation of facilities and avoid or minimize any disruption to service. It is also recommended that the utilities provide adequate notice to its customers of any service disruptions. V-17 The City of Santa Ana's Public Works Director will coordinate closely with all agencies and companies which maintain underground or at -grade utility or energy facilities within the areas to be disturbed by project construetion activities. Preliminary and final design plans will be made available to such agencies for review and comment. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of any excavation activities, the City will contact the Underground Service Alert to notify the affected utilitylenergy purveyors who can place their personnel at the excavation site to assist in the location of underground Final I December 2017 3-28 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-E883 facilities during the exploratory digging immediately preceding excavation. In this manner,. the risk of line rupture to natural gas, petroleum, and sewer facilities, which might release hazardous substances and odors into the air, can be minimized. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c� Require or resuit in the con3ttwetion of new ,storm water drainage fwflAres or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? As discussed in Response 3.9(d), the Project site currently includes only curb and no catch basin is present. As a result, seasonal ponding does occur along this portion of Bristol Street. The proposed Project would result in a nominal increase in impervious ground surfaces. The Project would result in the relocation of the existing curb features at the Project site and may include extension of the existing storm water pipeline system (located on the eastern side of Bristol Street) through a new lateral connection and new catch basin at the Project site. These improvements, if constructed, would result in a reduction of existing flooding and would be a beneficial impact. Thus, impacts would not be greater thanprevioudy analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 14 Have suffw- ient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? The proposed Project entails the intersection improvements; as such, the Project would not result in any increase in water demandfconsumption, Landscape improvements, if applicable, would not require any new or expanded water entitlements and would not be substantially increased, compared to that analyzed as part of the Bristol Street Widening Project. Thus, the proposed Project -would not create any new significant environmental impact. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. ej Result H-L a determutation by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the praject's projected demand in addition to the provider's existhV commitments? Refer to Response 3.17(a) and 3.17(b). The proposed Project would not result in an increase in wastewater production. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable: Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. fj Be served by a laadfrll with szgrwient permitted capacily to accommodate the project's solid nwste disposal needs? The proposed Project would generate construction waste on a short-term basis. Construction waste that cannot be recycled would be taken to available landfills. The closest receiving landfills for the City are the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in Irvine, and the Olinda Alpha Landfill at 1942 N. Valencia Avenue in Brea. The Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, which is owned and operated by the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department, opened in 1990, and has enough projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2053." The Olinda Alpha Landfill opened in 1960, and has enough 16 Orange County Waste and Recycling, Frank R. &merm an Landfill, http:llwww.oclandfills.com/landfill/active) Bowerman, accessed August 17, 2017. Final I December 2017 3-29 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1 -E883 projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2030.17 ❑linda's average disposal rate is nearly 7;000 tons per day (TPD), although it permitted up to 8,000 TPD. Thus, these facilities have adequate landfill capacity to serve the proposed Project and no new significant environmental impact would result from the Project implementation: Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIRMitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. g) Comply with federa4 state, aind local statutes and reguladiorns related to solid wave? Refer to Response 3.18(f). The proposed Project would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The Project would comply with the City of Santa Ana's established reduction, reuse, and recycling programs. No new significant solid waste impact would result from the proposed Project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable — Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Based on this Addendum,. the proposed Project has not substantially changed in regard to the setting, design, impacts, and mitigation measures as described in the 1990 FEISIEIR New circumstances or new information, including any new or revised environmental laws, regulations, or policies have not modified the impacts of the proposed Project aj Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the enviroumen4 substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or ivildVe species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self'- sustaiuing levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substaintial& reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Californk history or prehistory? The proposed Project would not result in impacts beyond those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR in this regard, and does not have the potential to degrade the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, threaten plant or animal communities, reduce or restrict endangered plant or animal species or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory with compliance with the 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are irndividually limiters but cumuladvely considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects,) ? Given the nature and scope of the proposed Project, and in consideration of mitigation measures that are included in the 1990 FEISIEl& the Project would not involve impacts that are cumulatively considerable. c} Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse e,,(f eets on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Construction -related activities are anticipated to have some relatively minor, temporary impacts which can be mitigated with implementation of measures included in the 1990 FELSIEIR Furthermore,. potential Iong-term (operational) impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of required 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures. 17 Orange County Waste and Recycling, Olinda Alpha Landfall, http:/Avww.o6landfiUs,coni/landfiU/active/ olindalandfill, accessed October 16, 2017. Final I December 2017 3-30 Environmental Consequences ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 4.0 REFERENCES The following references were utilized for the preparation of this Addendum: California Department of Conservation, Orange County Importaw Farmland 2014, ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dhp/ FMNW/pdfl20141oral4.pdf, accessed August 17, 2017. California Department of Transportation, California Scenic Highway Mapping System; http:llwww.dot.ca.gov/hq/ LandArehl16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm, accessed August 30, 2017. California Geological Survey, Fault Activity Map of California, http]/Maps,conservation.ca.gov/cgslfamlApp/ index.html,. accessed August 3, 2017. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana General Plan, adopted September 1982,. as amended. .City of Santa Ana, Citywide Design Guidelines. City of Santa Ana, Final Environmental Impact statement (FEIS) for Bristol Street Widening from Warner Avenue to Memory June, dated 1990. City of Santa Ana, Property Information Search, http://www.ei.santa-ana.iQa.us/property-info/, accessed August 17, 2017. City of Santa Ana, Measure M2 Comprehensive Ransportation Funding Program Call for Projects, dated October 20, 2016. Department of Conservation (DOC), Fault Activity Map of California, http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fanif Applindex.html, accessed August 2017.. Department of Toxic Substances Control, RnviroM or, http:llwww.envirostor.dtsc.ca,gov/public/, accessed August 2, 2017. Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEA44 Flood Map Service Center, https://msc.fema.gov/pQrtallsearch? AddressQuery=memory%201an&/o2C%20santa?�'920ana#searchresultsanchor, accessed August 3, 2017. Orange County Transportation Authority,. �015 Orange County Congestion Management Program, dated November 2015. Orange County Waste and Recycling, Freak R. Bowerman Landfall, http:Ilwww.oclandfiIls.com/landfil>/acLive bowerman, accessed August 17, 2017. Orange County Waste and Recycling; Olinda Alpha Landfill, http:llwww.oclatidfiIIs.comllandf'ill/active/ olindalandfill, accessed October 16, 2017. Google Earth, accessed September 2017. POWER Engineers, Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Envt onmental Impact ReportA"nd m, Januwy20, 2015. Southern California Association of Governments, 2016-2040 Regional Pransportation PlcaikShstainable Communities Strategy (RFPISCS), Transportation -System Project List, 2016. Southern California Association of Governments, Final2017 Federal Yansportction Improvement Program, 2016. State Water Resources Control Board, GeoRacker, http:llgeotracker.waterboards.ca.govl, accessed July 24, 2017. Final I December 2017 4-1 References ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 United States Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Survey, https:llwebsoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoil Survey. asp x, accessed August 2, 2017. Final I December 2017 4-2 References Appendix A Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 Aichjiedlnitial &udy Checklist The following Modified Initial Study Checklist is based on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Initial Study Checklist. It is modified to evaluate the proposed Project changes for which environmental impact reports/statements have previously been completed to assist in the determination of the need for supplemental environmental documents, in this case, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIS/EIR or an Addendum under Public Resources Code 21166 and Guideline Sections 15162, 15163, and 15164, respectively. For purposes of this study, references to "the proposal" in the left hand column questions refer to the modifications to the Project (proposed Project) as compared the Project improvements evaluated in the 1990 FEISIEIR. The first four columns to the right of the modified checklist questions identify whether the proposed Project changes would result in new impacts, and if s❑ whether these impacts would be less than significant, less than significant after mitigation, or significant. The fifth column asks whether or not the inipacts associated with Project changes, if any, were sufficiently disclosed in the previous environmental documents. Finally, the Iast column indicates whether or not a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR is needed. Moreover, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR would be needed if there were new significant unmitigated or substantially more severe impacts, which would result from the Project changes and which were not sufficiently disclosed in the previous environmental document. Final I December 2017 1 Appendix A — Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? YES NO ................... --- - b) Substantially damage scenic resources, - .......................... -------------------------- -............... including, but not limited to, trees, rock X YES N0 outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ---------------- ....... ................. --------------------------- e, c) Substantially degrade the existing visual ................... character or quality of the site and its r; YES NO surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light .................... or glare, which would adversely affect day X YES NO. or nighttime views in the area? 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland ? Y ES NO Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? ------- .... ...................... b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act r, YES NO contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or ........... ....................—.. --------- ........................................... cause rezoning, of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public x YES NO Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or ............. conversion of forest land to non -forest X YES Ro. use? e) Involve other changes in the existing ................................ . y ....... ....... environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of X YES Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation X ES of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or X E: NO projected air quality violation? Final I December 2017 2 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation c} Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state h YES NO ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to ................ substantial pollutant concentrations? X YES NO e) Create objectionable odors affecting a ................... substantial number of people? X YES NO 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local X YES Nu or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ....... ..... .......... ............... ---- ............ . b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or X YES NO regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal X YES NO pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with X YES NO established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, x YES NO such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Final I December 2017 3 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDLIM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other x YES NO approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as x YES NO defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological x YES NO resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique x YES NO geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal x YES NO cemeteries? 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area x YES NO or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? x YES NO iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including x YES NO liquefaction? YES iv) Landslides? x NO b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the x YES NO loss of topsoil? Final I December 2017 4 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially X YES N❑ result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B ofthe Uniform Building X YES NO Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems X YES N❑ where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMSSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a X YES NO significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of X YES NO reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 8. HAZARDS. Would the project involve' a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine X YES NO transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions X YES NO involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ................. ...................... ............................................................................ . c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, X YES NO substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code X YES NO Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Final I December 2017 5 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would X YES NO the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a X YES N0 safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? -- -- - - - - -- -- -- g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency v YES NO response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where X YES N0 wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY VVould the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or X YES NO waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table X YES NO level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? _..... ... .... ....... ......... ............... --------- .................. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a X YES N0 stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? Final I December 2017 6 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase X YES NO the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or x YES NO provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water X YES NO quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate x YES NO Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or X YES NO redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Ioss, injury or death X •YES Nit involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? YES NO j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established X YES *31 community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific X YES NO plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community X YES NO conservation plan? Final I December 2017 7 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of X YES N0 value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery X YES NO site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or X YES NO noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or X YES NO groundborne noise levels? ............. ............................................ .. ....................................... c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity X YES NO above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the X YE., NO project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would X YES NO the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Final I December 2017 8 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose X YES NO people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or X YES NO indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? - ............. ................... - - --- --.... ....................... ..... ...... b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of X YES NO replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of X YES NO replacement housing elsewhere? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services - a) Fire protection? X YES NO b) Police protection? X ................................. -------------- YES NO -........................--................ YES c) Schools? X NO d) Parks? X YES NO e} Other public facilities? X YES NO 15. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that X YES NO substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Final I December 2017 9 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that x YES N❑ might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and YES N0 relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other x YES NO standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels x YES NO or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or x YES NO dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency xYES NO access? 0 Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise X YES NO decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Final I December 2017 10 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDLIM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources X YES NO as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1 k or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section X YES NO 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment X YES NO requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, v YES NO the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ------------ -- c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the k YES NO construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing x YES NO entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Final I December 2017 11 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has x YES N❑ adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ---- . ........................................ .................. . tj Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the YES NO project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid x YES NO waste? 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Responses to the following questions are discussed in Chapter 3. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or YES NO animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" meansthat the incremental effects of a project are considerable when YES ND viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable fixture projects)? c) Does the project have environmental X YES NO effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Note: NIA = Not applicable 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Final I December 2017 12 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RTADDENDLIM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigation cj Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. Responses to this section are discussed further in Chapter 3. Final I December 2017 13 Appendix A — Modified Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 This page intentionally left blank. Final I December 2017 14 Appendix A — Modified Initial Study Checklist io Oil, • M l Rr-- C ••N • • a F, AM, LOCATION MAP r� C f f Y OF SAN fAANA FY 21=aP CAPrr,ALNPFDVBVENTPFELECTVVORHZHEEr sir •i . . - •-r•• •rx- -rriu• c i .., •. i .• . c - �rrri• x i - r •r••ar .. a a ,� r. a v r• r-i• r• r, r DI ' atria �i where a�yiwn sx Alfa sad and aye rah �n,�ie eml #e Cif}/spantow&sn&6USt tfromWanerAvent.etoA1b7aWLa%- wff-onoM,, wt& v✓asagaavrlbyQ/Coundln 1990andre evduatedh,-, b1. Pplo=com FY2122 FY2223 FY2324 FY240 FY2526 FYMW FYEM CO-Sh,dw 1,012,500 - - IUML 1,012,500 - - - - - SOLE EOFR M FY210 FY2223 FY2324 FY240 FY250 FY2627 FY2728 NT/210E 1,012,500 - TOTAL 11012,500 - DMSION: CPEngiE&rxl CONTACT KmVAOO,tn SabrO iE o7eer DATE 21 J+2021 ff PROJECT TITLE: Bristol St & Memory Ln Intersection Widening PROJECT CATEGORY: Street Improvements Street/Bridge Improvements & Widening LOCATION MAP AGENCY: Public Works CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 23/24CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed improvements would involve the widening of Bristol Street just north of Memory Lane to accommodate an additional through southbound lane. Additionally, the proposed improvements would include the construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter, pavement, signal modification, and curb ramps. PROJECT NEED: Bristol Street north of Memory Lane has three southbound lanes except at the intersection where only two southbound and one right turn lane exist. An additional southbound through lane is needed to complete the City's plan to widen Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane on the north, which was approved by City Council in 1990 and re- evaluated in 2001. PROJECT COSTS FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Construction 489,400 - - - - - - Right -Of -Way - TOTAL 489,400 SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 GAS TAX - - - - - - - MEASURE M2 COMPETITIVE 489,400 TSIA AREA F - TOTAL 489,400 DIVISION: CONTACT: C/P Engineering Jason Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer in PROJECT TITLE: Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Widening PROJECT CATEGORY: Street Improvements Street/Bridge Improvements & Widening LOCATION MAP 'ON AGENCY: Public Works CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 21/22CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed improvements would involve the widening of Bristol Street just north of Memory Lane to accommodate an additional through southbound lane. Additionally, the proposed improvements would include the construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter, pavement, signal modification, and curb ramps. PROJECT NEED: Bristol Street north of Memory Lane has three southbound lanes except at the intersection where only two southbound and one right turn lane exist. An additional southbound through lane is needed to complete the City's plan to widen Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane on the north, which was approved by City Council in 1990 and re- evaluated in 2001. PROJECT COSTS FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 Construction 400,000 - - - - - - TOTAL 400,000 - - - - - - SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 GAS TAX 400,000 - - - - - - TOTAL 400,000 - - DIVISION: CIP Engineering CONTACT: DATE: Kenny Nguyen, Senior Civil Engineer 07-May-2021 iff PROJECT TITLE: Bristol St & Memory Ln Intersection Widening PROJECT CATEGORY: Street Improvements Street/Bridge Improvements & Widening LOCATION MAP N 0 AGENCY: Public Works CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 25/26CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed improvements would involve the widening of Bristol Street just north of Memory Lane to accommodate an additional through southbound lane. Additionally, the proposed improvements would include the construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter, pavement, signal modification, and curb ramps. Fevaluated ECT NEED: eet north of Memory Lane has three southbound lanes except rsection where only two southbound and one right turn lane additiona! southbound through lane is needed to complete the n to widen Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane rth, which was approved by City Council in 1990 and re in 2001. PROJECT COSTS FY 25126 FY 26127 FY 27128 FY 28129 FY 29130 FY 30131 FY 31132 Engineering 200,000 - - - - - - TOTAL 200,000 - SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 25126 FY 26127 FY 27128 FY 28129 FY 29130 FY 30131 FY 31132 WATER CAPITAL 200,000 - - - - - - DIVISION: CIP Engineering TOTAL 200,000 - CONTACT: Alex Bangean, Senior Civil Engineer DATE: 15-Jan-2026