Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet_2025-04-01City Council Meeting Packet April 1, 2025 CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PM REGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM  (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting) CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Valerie Amezcua Mayor Thai Viet Phan Councilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2 Jessie Lopez Councilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil Bacerra Councilmember ­ Ward 4 Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Councilmember ­ Ward 5 David Penaloza Councilmember ­ Ward 6 Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900 Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520 Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney Alvaro Nuñez City Manager Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supporting documentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes. CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICS The City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and its community. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtful and inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets the challenges of today and tomorrow, as follows: Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment in youth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate • Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government services Mission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensures public safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a high quality of life for residents. Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility • Innovation • Transparency Code of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008, voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics and Conduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, and committees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: • Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • Efficiency Members of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As a courtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoom webinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTube LiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrum channel 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council on closed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one of the following ways: MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to: Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All written communications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s document archive system which is available for public review. SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the City Clerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you are commenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours before the scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s document archive system which is available for public review. LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide live comments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on or type the following address into your web browser https://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­ 9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerk when it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) public hearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you may virtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of the caller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 or microphone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identify themselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unless due to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide a different amount of time to speak. IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at the podium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available for members of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presiding chair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a “Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m. for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not be accepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of the presiding chair. The following designated public comment periods are: 1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide live comments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand BY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.   2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDA ITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. 3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.  TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at City Council meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the use of headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to those wishing to address the City Council at the podium.  La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo.  La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos y la interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible para cualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio. About the Agenda To download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) for each agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open in a new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ). CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on Closed Session items. RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States District Court Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFM B. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, and Bruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01414415 C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01426663 2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATION pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One (1) case­ Union Pacific 3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1): TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney 4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Unrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney RECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Amezcua WORDS OF INSPIRATION Police Chaplain ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange County declaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of Outstanding Contributions to the Community 2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and the Downtown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month 3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaring April 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month 4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchez for Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to Princeton University 5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April 30, 2025 as Black April CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. CONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.  6.Excused Absences Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25, 2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Receive and file. 9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6 Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for a Partial Term Expiring December 8, 2026 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer the Oath of Office. 10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium) Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium). 11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) Department(s): Library Recommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) 12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­ 6706) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 1 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity Clerk In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supporting documentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes. CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICS The City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and its community. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtful and inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets the challenges of today and tomorrow, as follows: Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment in youth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate • Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government services Mission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensures public safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a high quality of life for residents. Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility • Innovation • Transparency Code of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008, voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics and Conduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, and committees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: • Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • Efficiency Members of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As a courtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoom webinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTube LiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrum channel 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council on closed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one of the following ways: MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to: Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All written communications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s document archive system which is available for public review. SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the City Clerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you are commenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours before the scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s document archive system which is available for public review. LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide live comments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on or type the following address into your web browser https://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­ 9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerk when it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) public hearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you may virtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of the caller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 or microphone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identify themselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unless due to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide a different amount of time to speak. IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at the podium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available for members of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presiding chair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a “Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m. for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not be accepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of the presiding chair. The following designated public comment periods are: 1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide live comments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand BY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.   2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDA ITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. 3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.  TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at City Council meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the use of headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to those wishing to address the City Council at the podium.  La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo.  La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos y la interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible para cualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio. About the Agenda To download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) for each agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open in a new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ). CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on Closed Session items. RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States District Court Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFM B. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, and Bruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01414415 C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01426663 2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATION pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One (1) case­ Union Pacific 3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1): TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney 4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Unrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney RECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Amezcua WORDS OF INSPIRATION Police Chaplain ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange County declaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of Outstanding Contributions to the Community 2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and the Downtown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month 3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaring April 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month 4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchez for Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to Princeton University 5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April 30, 2025 as Black April CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. CONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.  6.Excused Absences Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25, 2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Receive and file. 9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6 Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for a Partial Term Expiring December 8, 2026 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer the Oath of Office. 10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium) Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium). 11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) Department(s): Library Recommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) 12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­ 6706) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 2 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics and Conduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, and committees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: • Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • Efficiency Members of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As a courtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoom webinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTube LiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrum channel 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council on closed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one of the following ways: MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to: Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All written communications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s document archive system which is available for public review. SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the City Clerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you are commenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours before the scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s document archive system which is available for public review. LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide live comments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on or type the following address into your web browser https://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­ 9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerk when it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) public hearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you may virtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of the caller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 or microphone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identify themselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unless due to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide a different amount of time to speak. IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at the podium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available for members of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presiding chair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a “Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m. for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not be accepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of the presiding chair. The following designated public comment periods are: 1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide live comments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand BY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.   2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDA ITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. 3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.  TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at City Council meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the use of headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to those wishing to address the City Council at the podium.  La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo.  La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos y la interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible para cualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio. About the Agenda To download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) for each agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open in a new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ). CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on Closed Session items. RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States District Court Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFM B. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, and Bruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01414415 C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01426663 2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATION pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One (1) case­ Union Pacific 3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1): TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney 4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Unrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney RECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Amezcua WORDS OF INSPIRATION Police Chaplain ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange County declaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of Outstanding Contributions to the Community 2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and the Downtown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month 3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaring April 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month 4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchez for Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to Princeton University 5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April 30, 2025 as Black April CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. CONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.  6.Excused Absences Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25, 2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Receive and file. 9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6 Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for a Partial Term Expiring December 8, 2026 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer the Oath of Office. 10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium) Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium). 11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) Department(s): Library Recommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) 12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­ 6706) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 3 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m. for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not be accepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of the presiding chair. The following designated public comment periods are: 1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide live comments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand BY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.   2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDA ITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. 3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.  TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at City Council meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the use of headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to those wishing to address the City Council at the podium.  La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo.  La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos y la interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible para cualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio. About the Agenda To download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) for each agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open in a new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ). CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on Closed Session items. RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States District Court Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFM B. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, and Bruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01414415 C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01426663 2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATION pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One (1) case­ Union Pacific 3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1): TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney 4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Unrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney RECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Amezcua WORDS OF INSPIRATION Police Chaplain ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange County declaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of Outstanding Contributions to the Community 2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and the Downtown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month 3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaring April 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month 4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchez for Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to Princeton University 5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April 30, 2025 as Black April CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. CONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.  6.Excused Absences Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25, 2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Receive and file. 9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6 Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for a Partial Term Expiring December 8, 2026 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer the Oath of Office. 10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium) Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium). 11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) Department(s): Library Recommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) 12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­ 6706) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 4 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) for each agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open in a new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ). CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on Closed Session items. RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States District Court Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFM B. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, and Bruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01414415 C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30­2024­01426663 2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATION pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One (1) case­ Union Pacific 3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1): TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney 4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Unrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney RECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Amezcua WORDS OF INSPIRATION Police Chaplain ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange County declaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of Outstanding Contributions to the Community 2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and the Downtown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month 3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaring April 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month 4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchez for Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to Princeton University 5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April 30, 2025 as Black April CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. CONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.  6.Excused Absences Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25, 2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Receive and file. 9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6 Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for a Partial Term Expiring December 8, 2026 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer the Oath of Office. 10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium) Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium). 11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) Department(s): Library Recommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) 12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­ 6706) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 5 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One (1) case­ Union Pacific 3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1): TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney 4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Unrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney RECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor  Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Amezcua WORDS OF INSPIRATION Police Chaplain ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange County declaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of Outstanding Contributions to the Community 2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and the Downtown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month 3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaring April 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month 4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchez for Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to Princeton University 5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April 30, 2025 as Black April CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. CONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.  6.Excused Absences Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25, 2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Receive and file. 9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6 Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for a Partial Term Expiring December 8, 2026 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer the Oath of Office. 10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium) Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium). 11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) Department(s): Library Recommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) 12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­ 6706) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 6 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:One (1) case­ Union Pacific3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government CodeSection 54957(b)(1):TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section54957.6(a):Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of HumanResourcesUnrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City AttorneyRECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor AmezcuaWORDS OF INSPIRATION Police ChaplainADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDACEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange Countydeclaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of OutstandingContributions to the Community2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and the Downtown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month 3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaring April 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month 4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchez for Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to Princeton University 5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April 30, 2025 as Black April CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. CONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.  6.Excused Absences Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25, 2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Receive and file. 9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6 Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for a Partial Term Expiring December 8, 2026 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer the Oath of Office. 10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium) Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium). 11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) Department(s): Library Recommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) 12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­ 6706) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 7 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:One (1) case­ Union Pacific3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government CodeSection 54957(b)(1):TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section54957.6(a):Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of HumanResourcesUnrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City AttorneyRECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor AmezcuaWORDS OF INSPIRATION Police ChaplainADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDACEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange Countydeclaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of OutstandingContributions to the Community2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and theDowntown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaringApril 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchezfor Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to PrincetonUniversity5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April30, 2025 as Black AprilCLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from ClosedSession.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meetingfor ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings.Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened.CONSENT CALENDARRECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the followingConsent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutionsand ordinances. 6.Excused AbsencesDepartment(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Excuse the absent members.7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve minutes.8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25,2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13,2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Receive and file.9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for aPartial Term Expiring December 8, 2026Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer the Oath of Office. 10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium) Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium). 11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) Department(s): Library Recommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) 12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­ 6706) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 8 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:One (1) case­ Union Pacific3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government CodeSection 54957(b)(1):TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section54957.6(a):Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of HumanResourcesUnrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City AttorneyRECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor AmezcuaWORDS OF INSPIRATION Police ChaplainADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDACEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange Countydeclaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of OutstandingContributions to the Community2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and theDowntown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaringApril 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchezfor Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to PrincetonUniversity5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April30, 2025 as Black AprilCLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from ClosedSession.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meetingfor ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings.Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened.CONSENT CALENDARRECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the followingConsent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutionsand ordinances. 6.Excused AbsencesDepartment(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Excuse the absent members.7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve minutes.8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25,2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13,2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Receive and file.9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for aPartial Term Expiring December 8, 2026Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, andCommunity Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer theOath of Office.10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d)Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10)Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment,Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84(Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium)Department(s): Planning and Building AgencyRecommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant toSection 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measuresto alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 onMay 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15)days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion ofindustrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84)Moratorium).11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding(General Fund)Department(s): LibraryRecommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the LibraryMiscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the LibraryTech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, toapply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes)12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding andAmend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer RoadImprovements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizingMeasure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­StreetConstruction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) andappropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, ImprovementsOther Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future yearexpenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706) 13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. 14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. 15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000. 16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Department(s): Human Resources Recommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­ XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 9 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:One (1) case­ Union Pacific3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government CodeSection 54957(b)(1):TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section54957.6(a):Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of HumanResourcesUnrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City AttorneyRECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor AmezcuaWORDS OF INSPIRATION Police ChaplainADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDACEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange Countydeclaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of OutstandingContributions to the Community2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and theDowntown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaringApril 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchezfor Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to PrincetonUniversity5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April30, 2025 as Black AprilCLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from ClosedSession.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meetingfor ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings.Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened.CONSENT CALENDARRECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the followingConsent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutionsand ordinances. 6.Excused AbsencesDepartment(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Excuse the absent members.7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve minutes.8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25,2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13,2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Receive and file.9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for aPartial Term Expiring December 8, 2026Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, andCommunity Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer theOath of Office.10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d)Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10)Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment,Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84(Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium)Department(s): Planning and Building AgencyRecommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant toSection 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measuresto alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 onMay 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15)days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion ofindustrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84)Moratorium).11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding(General Fund)Department(s): LibraryRecommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the LibraryMiscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the LibraryTech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, toapply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes)12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding andAmend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer RoadImprovements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizingMeasure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­StreetConstruction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) andappropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, ImprovementsOther Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future yearexpenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital ImprovementProgram to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for theDyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (ProjectNo. 25­6706)13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one,new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus acontingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013.14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation forone, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in anamount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not toexceed $260,023.15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, andOperational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Finance and Management ServicesRecommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc.for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1,2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, fora total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000.16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of SantaAna and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council AppointeeSalary ScheduleDepartment(s): Human ResourcesRecommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the EmploymentAgreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positiveCity Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approvingan adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX).2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan withthe amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN 17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626. 18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 10 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:One (1) case­ Union Pacific3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government CodeSection 54957(b)(1):TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section54957.6(a):Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of HumanResourcesUnrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City AttorneyRECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor AmezcuaWORDS OF INSPIRATION Police ChaplainADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDACEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange Countydeclaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of OutstandingContributions to the Community2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and theDowntown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaringApril 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchezfor Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to PrincetonUniversity5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April30, 2025 as Black AprilCLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from ClosedSession.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meetingfor ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings.Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened.CONSENT CALENDARRECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the followingConsent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutionsand ordinances. 6.Excused AbsencesDepartment(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Excuse the absent members.7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve minutes.8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25,2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13,2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Receive and file.9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for aPartial Term Expiring December 8, 2026Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, andCommunity Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer theOath of Office.10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d)Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10)Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment,Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84(Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium)Department(s): Planning and Building AgencyRecommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant toSection 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measuresto alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 onMay 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15)days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion ofindustrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84)Moratorium).11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding(General Fund)Department(s): LibraryRecommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the LibraryMiscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the LibraryTech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, toapply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes)12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding andAmend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer RoadImprovements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizingMeasure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­StreetConstruction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) andappropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, ImprovementsOther Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future yearexpenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital ImprovementProgram to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for theDyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (ProjectNo. 25­6706)13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one,new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus acontingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013.14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation forone, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in anamount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not toexceed $260,023.15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, andOperational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Finance and Management ServicesRecommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc.for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1,2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, fora total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000.16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of SantaAna and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council AppointeeSalary ScheduleDepartment(s): Human ResourcesRecommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the EmploymentAgreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positiveCity Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approvingan adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX).2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan withthe amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council AppointeeSalary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' RetirementSystem (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5.RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’SCLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old GrandStreet, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626)(General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 CapitalImprovement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project.2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of$716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contractadministration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency forunanticipated or unforeseen work.3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder,in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders,for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for aterm beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute thecontract.4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, therecommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical ExemptionEnvironmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626.18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange forthe Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional TrafficSignal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing$760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, andOrange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, ExpenseReimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the sameamount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Buildingexpenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street,Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requiresfive affirmative votes.)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Programto include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for theKraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX). 19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** BUSINESS CALENDAR 20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­Time Positions (Non­General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25 annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency  RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use Department(s): City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 11 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:One (1) case­ Union Pacific3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government CodeSection 54957(b)(1):TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section54957.6(a):Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of HumanResourcesUnrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City AttorneyRECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor AmezcuaWORDS OF INSPIRATION Police ChaplainADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDACEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange Countydeclaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of OutstandingContributions to the Community2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and theDowntown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaringApril 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchezfor Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to PrincetonUniversity5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April30, 2025 as Black AprilCLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from ClosedSession.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meetingfor ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings.Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened.CONSENT CALENDARRECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the followingConsent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutionsand ordinances. 6.Excused AbsencesDepartment(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Excuse the absent members.7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve minutes.8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25,2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13,2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Receive and file.9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for aPartial Term Expiring December 8, 2026Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, andCommunity Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer theOath of Office.10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d)Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10)Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment,Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84(Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium)Department(s): Planning and Building AgencyRecommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant toSection 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measuresto alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 onMay 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15)days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion ofindustrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84)Moratorium).11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding(General Fund)Department(s): LibraryRecommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the LibraryMiscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the LibraryTech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, toapply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes)12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding andAmend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer RoadImprovements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizingMeasure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­StreetConstruction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) andappropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, ImprovementsOther Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future yearexpenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital ImprovementProgram to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for theDyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (ProjectNo. 25­6706)13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one,new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus acontingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013.14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation forone, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in anamount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not toexceed $260,023.15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, andOperational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Finance and Management ServicesRecommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc.for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1,2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, fora total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000.16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of SantaAna and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council AppointeeSalary ScheduleDepartment(s): Human ResourcesRecommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the EmploymentAgreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positiveCity Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approvingan adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX).2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan withthe amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council AppointeeSalary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' RetirementSystem (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5.RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’SCLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old GrandStreet, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626)(General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 CapitalImprovement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project.2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of$716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contractadministration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency forunanticipated or unforeseen work.3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder,in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders,for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for aterm beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute thecontract.4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, therecommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical ExemptionEnvironmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626.18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange forthe Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional TrafficSignal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing$760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, andOrange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, ExpenseReimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the sameamount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Buildingexpenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street,Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requiresfive affirmative votes.)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Programto include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for theKraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic SignalSynchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705).3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities ofBrea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles andresponsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand AvenueCorridorRegional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning uponfull approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030,with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX).19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 RequiredPavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement withBucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Updateservices, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of$119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiringMarch 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions.**END OF CONSENT CALENDAR**BUSINESS CALENDAR20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­TimePositions (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction ServicesSection in the Public Works Agency RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKSAGENCY21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code IncludingMeeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerkand City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign ContributionsEffect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for UseDepartment(s): City Attorney’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the CityCouncil of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­ 749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD­84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 12 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:One (1) case­ Union Pacific3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government CodeSection 54957(b)(1):TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section54957.6(a):Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of HumanResourcesUnrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City AttorneyRECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor AmezcuaWORDS OF INSPIRATION Police ChaplainADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDACEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange Countydeclaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of OutstandingContributions to the Community2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and theDowntown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaringApril 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchezfor Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to PrincetonUniversity5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April30, 2025 as Black AprilCLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from ClosedSession.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meetingfor ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings.Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened.CONSENT CALENDARRECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the followingConsent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutionsand ordinances. 6.Excused AbsencesDepartment(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Excuse the absent members.7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve minutes.8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25,2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13,2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Receive and file.9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for aPartial Term Expiring December 8, 2026Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, andCommunity Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer theOath of Office.10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d)Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10)Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment,Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84(Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium)Department(s): Planning and Building AgencyRecommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant toSection 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measuresto alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 onMay 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15)days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion ofindustrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84)Moratorium).11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding(General Fund)Department(s): LibraryRecommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the LibraryMiscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the LibraryTech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, toapply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes)12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding andAmend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer RoadImprovements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizingMeasure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­StreetConstruction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) andappropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, ImprovementsOther Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future yearexpenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital ImprovementProgram to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for theDyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (ProjectNo. 25­6706)13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one,new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus acontingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013.14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation forone, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in anamount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not toexceed $260,023.15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, andOperational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Finance and Management ServicesRecommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc.for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1,2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, fora total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000.16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of SantaAna and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council AppointeeSalary ScheduleDepartment(s): Human ResourcesRecommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the EmploymentAgreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positiveCity Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approvingan adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX).2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan withthe amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council AppointeeSalary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' RetirementSystem (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5.RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’SCLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old GrandStreet, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626)(General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 CapitalImprovement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project.2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of$716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contractadministration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency forunanticipated or unforeseen work.3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder,in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders,for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for aterm beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute thecontract.4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, therecommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical ExemptionEnvironmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626.18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange forthe Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional TrafficSignal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing$760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, andOrange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, ExpenseReimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the sameamount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Buildingexpenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street,Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requiresfive affirmative votes.)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Programto include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for theKraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic SignalSynchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705).3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities ofBrea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles andresponsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand AvenueCorridorRegional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning uponfull approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030,with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX).19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 RequiredPavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement withBucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Updateservices, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of$119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiringMarch 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions.**END OF CONSENT CALENDAR**BUSINESS CALENDAR20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­TimePositions (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction ServicesSection in the Public Works Agency RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKSAGENCY21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code IncludingMeeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerkand City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign ContributionsEffect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for UseDepartment(s): City Attorney’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the CityCouncil of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana MunicipalCode as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and RecordingSecretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII ofChapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority,Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority,and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions.ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANAMUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS;CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS ANDCOMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDINGTHE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY,AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGNCONTRIBUTIONS**END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR**PUBLIC HEARINGSPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of thePublic Hearing items.22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning CodeEnvironmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), ZoningOrdinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No.2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code,Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana MunicipalCode (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and OperatingStandards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the LightIndustrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within theSD­84 District BoundaryLegal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on sameday.Department(s): Planning and Building AgencyRecommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to PublicResources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning CodeEnvironmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100).Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based onindependent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, inexercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with anaddendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non­conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­ 03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 13 4/1/2025   City Council Meeting PacketApril 1, 2025CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 PMREGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting)CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701Valerie AmezcuaMayorThai Viet PhanCouncilmember – Ward 1 Benjamin VazquezMayor Pro Tem ­ Ward 2Jessie LopezCouncilmember ­ Ward 3 Phil BacerraCouncilmember ­ Ward 4Johnathan Ryan HernandezCouncilmember ­ Ward 5 David PenalozaCouncilmember ­ Ward 6Mayor and Council telephone: 714­647­6900Agenda item inquiries: 714­647­6520Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Attorney Alvaro NuñezCity Manager Jennifer L. HallCity ClerkIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting,contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647­5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enablethe City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supportingdocumentation can be found on the City’s website – www.santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICSThe City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and itscommunity. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtfuland inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets thechallenges of today and tomorrow, as follows:Vision ­ The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment inyouth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government servicesMission ­ To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensurespublic safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a highquality of life for residents.Guiding Principles ­ Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation • TransparencyCode of Ethics and Conduct ­ At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008,voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics andConduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, andcommittees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: •Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • EfficiencyMembers of the public may attend the City Council meeting in­person or join via Zoom. As acourtesy to the public, the City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoomwebinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet, or smart phone via YouTubeLiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrumchannel 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public who wish to address the City Council onclosed session items, items on the regular agenda, or on matters which are not on theagenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, may do so by one ofthe following ways:MAILING OPTION written communications – Public comments may be mailed to:Office of the City Clerk, 20 Civic Center Plaza M­30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All writtencommunications received via mail two (2) hours before the scheduled start of themeeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City’s documentarchive system which is available for public review.SENDING E­MAIL OPTION – Public comments may be sent via email to the CityClerk’s office at eComment@santa­ana.org. Please note the agenda item you arecommenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received two (2) hours beforethe scheduled start of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imagedinto the City’s document archive system which is available for public review.LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION – As a courtesy, members of the public may provide livecomments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on ortype the following address into your web browserhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900­9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerkwhen it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) agenda/general comments, or iii) publichearing item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you mayvirtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of thecaller’s phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 ormicrophone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identifythemselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unlessdue to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide adifferent amount of time to speak.IN­PERSON OPTION ­ Members of the public can provide in­person comments at thepodium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available formembers of the public to attend the meeting in­person. Public comments are limited tothree (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presidingchair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a“Request to Speak” card by 4:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 5:45 p.m.for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not beaccepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of thepresiding chair.The following designated public comment periods are:1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – You can provide livecomments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described inthe LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will openat 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL and raise your handBY 4:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue with their hand raised by 4:00 p.m.will not be permitted to speak.  2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON­AGENDAITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) – You can provide comments by joining Zoom orthe Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTSOPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 3:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THECONFERENCE CALL and raise your hand PRIOR TO 5:45 p.m. Speakers who are not inthe speaker queue with their hand raised by 5:45 p.m. will not be permitted to speak.3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS – You can providecomments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN­PERSONPUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 5:45 p.m. will not bepermitted to speak. TRANSLATION SERVICES ­ Spanish interpreting services are provided at CityCouncil meetings. Simultaneous Spanish interpretation is provided through the useof headsets and consecutive interpretation (Spanish­to­English) in addition to thosewishing to address the City Council at the podium. La ciudad provee servicios de interpretación al español en las juntas del Consejo. La interpretación simultánea al español se ofrece por medio del uso de audífonos yla interpretación consecutiva (español a inglés) también está disponible paracualquiera que desee dirigirse al consejo municipal en el podio.About the AgendaTo download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) foreach agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open ina new link (the eyeball ) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ).CLOSED SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSIONPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on ClosedSession items.RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regularCity business.CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certainmatters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice fromthe City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice theposition of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant toParagraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code:A. Anchor Stone Christian Church v. City of Santa Ana, et al., United States DistrictCourt Case No 8:25­cv­00215­JWH­DFMB. Lawrence M. Kuda, Jr. as Trustee of the Kuda Family Surviving Grantors Trust, andBruce Metal And Salvage, Inc. v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court,Case No. 30­2024­01414415C. SRP/Stater Bros, LLC v. City of Santa Ana, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30­2024­014266632.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATIONpursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:One (1) case­ Union Pacific3.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government CodeSection 54957(b)(1):TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney4.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section54957.6(a):Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of HumanResourcesUnrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City AttorneyRECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSIONCALL TO ORDERATTENDANCE Council Members Phil BacerraJohnathan Ryan HernandezJessie LopezDavid PenalozaThai Viet PhanMayor  Pro Tem Benjamin VazquezMayorValerie AmezcuaCity Manager Alvaro NuñezCity Attorney Sonia R. CarvalhoCity Clerk Jennifer L. HallROLL CALLPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor AmezcuaWORDS OF INSPIRATION Police ChaplainADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDACEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS1.Proclamation presented by Mayor Amezcua to the Girl Scouts of Orange Countydeclaring March 12, 2025 as Girl Scouts Day and for 113 Years of OutstandingContributions to the Community2.Proclamation presented by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez to Latino Health Access and theDowntown Family Resource Center to commemorate April as Blue Ribbon Month3.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to The Cambodian Family declaringApril 2025 as Cambodian Heritage Month4.Certiifcate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Penaloza to Paola Sanchezfor Outstanding Academic Achievements including being accepted to PrincetonUniversity5.Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to Little Saigon TV declaring April30, 2025 as Black AprilCLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from ClosedSession.PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meetingfor ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items, with the exception of public hearings.Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened.CONSENT CALENDARRECOMMENDED ACTION:  Approve staff recommendations on the followingConsent Calendar Items: 6 through 19 and waive reading of all resolutionsand ordinances. 6.Excused AbsencesDepartment(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Excuse the absent members.7.Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 18, 2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve minutes.8.Minutes from the Special Meeting of Measure X Oversight Commission on January 25,2025 and the Regular Meeting of the Police Oversight Commission on February 13,2025Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Receive and file.9.Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez Nominated by Councilmember Penaloza as the Ward 6Representative to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission for aPartial Term Expiring December 8, 2026Department(s): City Clerk’s OfficeRecommended Action: Appoint Alejandra Rodriguez to the Parks, Recreation, andCommunity Services Commission as the Ward 6 representative and administer theOath of Office.10.Ten­Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d)Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 Extension of Ten (10)Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment,Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84(Transit Zoning Code (SD­84) Moratorium)Department(s): Planning and Building AgencyRecommended Action: Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant toSection 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measuresto alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS­3064 onMay 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15)days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion ofindustrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD­84)Moratorium).11.Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding(General Fund)Department(s): LibraryRecommended Action: Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the LibraryMiscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the LibraryTech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, toapply toward Library e­resources. (Requires five affirmative votes)12.Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding andAmend the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer RoadImprovements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25­6706)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizingMeasure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M­StreetConstruction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002­52332) andappropriate the same amount into the Measure M­Street Construction, ImprovementsOther Than Building expenditure account (03217663­66220) for future yearexpenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­2025 Capital ImprovementProgram to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for theDyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (ProjectNo. 25­6706)13.Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E­450with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25­022) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one,new/unused 2024 Ford E­450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus acontingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013.14.Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F­600Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25­031) (Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation forone, new/unused 2025 Ford F­600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in anamount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not toexceed $260,023.15.Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, andOperational Supplies (Specification No. 25­048) (General Fund and Non­GeneralFund)Department(s): Finance and Management ServicesRecommended Action: Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc.for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1,2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not­to­exceed $400,000, fora total contract amount not­to­exceed $1,600,000.16.Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of SantaAna and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council AppointeeSalary ScheduleDepartment(s): Human ResourcesRecommended Action: 1. Approve a first amendment to the EmploymentAgreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positiveCity Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approvingan adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX).2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan withthe amended annual salary for City Manager, and approving the Council AppointeeSalary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' RetirementSystem (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5.RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’SCLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN17.Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old GrandStreet, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24­6626)(General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024­25 CapitalImprovement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station70 Remodel ADA Restroom and Generator Project.2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of$716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contractadministration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency forunanticipated or unforeseen work.3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder,in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders,for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for aterm beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize City Manager to execute thecontract.4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, therecommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical ExemptionEnvironmental Review No. ER­2025­11 was filed for project 24­6626.18.Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange forthe Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional TrafficSignal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing$760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, andOrange, into the Public Works Measure M­Street Construction, ExpenseReimbursement revenue account (03217002­57000) and appropriate the sameamount into the Measure M­Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Buildingexpenditure account (03217663­66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street,Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requiresfive affirmative votes.)2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024­25 Capital Improvement Programto include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for theKraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic SignalSynchronization Project (Project No. 25­6705).3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities ofBrea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles andresponsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand AvenueCorridorRegional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning uponfull approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030,with an option for extension (Agreement No. A­2025­XXX).19.Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 RequiredPavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25­6898) (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement withBucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., for Pavement Management Program Updateservices, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of$119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiringMarch 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one­year extensions.**END OF CONSENT CALENDAR**BUSINESS CALENDAR20.Fiscal Year 2024­25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full­TimePositions (Non­General Fund)Department(s): Public Works AgencyRecommended Action: Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024­25annual budget to add 13 full­time positions and create a Construction ServicesSection in the Public Works Agency RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024­25ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL­TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKSAGENCY21.Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code IncludingMeeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerkand City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign ContributionsEffect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for UseDepartment(s): City Attorney’s OfficeRecommended Action: Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the CityCouncil of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana MunicipalCode as to Section 2­328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and RecordingSecretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2­331.5Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII ofChapter 2, Amending Section 2­748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority,Adding Section 2­748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority,and Repealing Section 2­107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions.ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANAMUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2­328 REGARDING MEETINGS;CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS ANDCOMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2­331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDINGTHE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2­748REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2­749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY,AND REPEALING SECTION 2­107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGNCONTRIBUTIONS**END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR**PUBLIC HEARINGSPUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on each of thePublic Hearing items.22.Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning CodeEnvironmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), ZoningOrdinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02 and Amendment Application (AA) No.2024­03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code,Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana MunicipalCode (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and OperatingStandards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the LightIndustrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within theSD­84 District BoundaryLegal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on sameday.Department(s): Planning and Building AgencyRecommended Action: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to PublicResources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning CodeEnvironmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100).Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based onindependent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, inexercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD­84 Final EIR with anaddendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162,no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of theproposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, anaddendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared.RESOLUTION NO. 2025­XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLICRESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THETRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATECLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100)2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024­02amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, SpecificDevelopment No. 84 (SD­84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana MunicipalCode including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in thezoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishingrevised non­conforming use regulations, including the addition ofan amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards forcertain permitted and non­conforming uses.ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.2024­02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OFARTICLE XIX  OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THEREGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONINGCODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYINGTHE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISEDNONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF ANAMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONALSTANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024­03amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial)suffixes from certain properties within the SD­84 zoning district boundary asdesignated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map.ORDINANCE NO. NS­XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024­03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANAAMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BYREMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL)SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD­84 ZONING DISTRICTBOUNDARYCITY MANAGER COMMENTSCOUNCIL COMMENTSAB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time formembers of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board orcommission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended.  1. March 26, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – California Senate Testimony in Support of SB329, Sacramento, CA ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Transit Zoning Code Updates 2. FY 2025/26 Budget POSTING STATEMENT: On March 25, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the entrance to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Internet Access to City Council, Agency, and Authority agendas and related material is available prior to meetings at santa­ana.org/agendas­and­minutes.   City Council 14 4/1/2025   CITY COUNCIL 1 MARCH 18, 2025 DRAFT Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council City of Santa Ana, California March 18, 2025 CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 4:00 P.M. REGULAR OPEN MEETING – 5:30 P.M. (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting) CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua called the Closed Session meeting to order at 4:10 P.M. ATTENDANCE Council Members Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Mayor Pro Tem Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager Alvaro Nuñez City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL MINUTES: City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall conducted roll call. Councilmembers Hernandez, Penaloza, and Phan, Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez, and Mayor Amezcua were present. Councilmembers Bacerra and Lopez arrived during Closed Session.     City Council 7 – 1 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 2 MARCH 18, 2025 ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION MINUTES: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may address the City Council on Closed Session items. MINUTES: City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall stated there were no comments. RECESS – City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business. MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua recessed to consider the Closed Session items at 4:11 P.M. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATION pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: (So Cal Edison) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Negotiator: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Employee Organization: Santa Ana Middle Management / Administrative Management Association (SAMA) 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1): TITLE: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney 4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Designated Representative: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Unrepresented Employees: City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. RECONVENE – City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.     City Council 7 – 2 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 3 MARCH 18, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua reconvened the City Council Meeting to order at 6:24 P.M. ATTENDANCE Councilmembers Mayor Pro Tem Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Benjamin Vazquez Mayor Valerie Amezcua City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Alvaro Nuñez Sonia R. Carvalho Jennifer L. Hall ROLL CALL MINUTES: City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall conducted roll call. Councilmembers Bacerra, Hernandez, Lopez, Penaloza, and Phan, Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez, and Mayor Amezcua were present. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Alicia Serrato WORDS OF INSPIRATION Police Chaplain Bob Barnett ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA MINUTES: None. CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS 1. Certificates of Recognition presented by Mayor Amezcua to Santa Ana High School Boys and Girls Wrestling Teams for Exceptional Sportsmanship MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua presented certificates of recognition to Santa Ana High School Boys and Girls Wresting Teams for exceptional sportsmanship. 2. Certificates of Recognition presented by Councilmember Bacerra to the Santiago High School Boys Basketball Team for Exceptional Sportsmanship and their CIF Championship MINUTES: Councilmember Bacerra presented certificates of recognition to the Santiago High School Boys Basketball Team for exceptional sportsmanship and their CIF Championship.     City Council 7 – 3 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 4 MARCH 18, 2025 3. Certificate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Lopez to Stanford Sound and Stage for their Outstanding Contributions to the Community MINUTES: Councilmember Lopez presented a certificate of recognition to Stanford Sound and Stage for their outstanding contributions to the community. CLOSED SESSION REPORT – The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. MINUTES: City Attorney Sonia Carvalho announced there was no reportable action. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non­agenda items. MINUTES: City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall reported out the summary of email comments received: (26) Agenda Item No. 16 and (12) non-agenda comments. The following speakers addressed City Council in-person: 1. Erik Sanchez invited all to attend the grand opening of La Colmena Walnut Farm on April 5, 2025 located at 1901 West Walnut. 2. Joel Parker spoke regarding Agenda Item No.12. 3. Catalina Iniestra (translation: Spanish) spoke regarding the Adopt-a-Lot program. 4. Veronica Garcia (translation: Spanish) spoke regarding the Adopt-a-Lot program. 5. Monica Acevedo Guerrero spoke regarding the Adopt-a-Lot program. 6. Dulce Maria Sanchez (translation: Spanish) spoke regarding the Adopt-a-Lot program. 7. Rocio Guzman (translation: Spanish) spoke regarding the Adopt-a-Lot program. 8. Jeffrey J. Jensen expressed concern regarding pricing adjustments for parking in Downtown. 9. Delilah Snell expressed concern regarding pricing adjustments for parking in Downtown. 10.Layne Sutton expressed concern regarding unsafe driving and speeding on Civic Center at the intersection of French Street. The following speakers addressed City Council via teleconference: 11. Mike Tardiff spoke regarding SD84 transit zoning and the March 3rd train station meeting.    City Council 7 – 4 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 5 MARCH 18, 2025 12.Tim Johnson spoke regarding Agenda Item No. 15 and the sunset date of Measure X. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 4 through 14 and waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. MINUTES: At 7:37 P.M., the Consent Calendar was considered. Councilmember Hernandez pulled Agenda Item No. 11 for separate discussion and consideration. Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez requested to comment on Agenda Item No. 9. Mayor Amezcua pulled Agenda Item No. 8 for separate discussion and consideration. MOTION: Councilmember Penaloza moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 4 through 14 with the exception of Agenda Item Nos. 8, 9, and 11 pulled for separate discussion and consideration, seconded by Councilmember Bacerra. The motion carried, 7-0, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER BACERRA, COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ, MAYOR AMEZCUA NONE NONE NONE Status: 7 – 0 – Pass 4. Excused Absences Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 5. Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 4, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. CONSENT CALENDAR     City Council 7 – 5 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 6 MARCH 18, 2025 6. Minutes from the Regular Meetings of the Rental Housing Board on August 21, 2024, Workforce Development Board Youth Council Committee on December 12, 2024, and Arts and Culture Commission on January 16, 2025 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Receive and file. 7. Appoint Enrique Adame Nominated by Councilmember Bacerra as the Ward 4 Representative to the Community Development Commission for a Partial Term Expiring December 8, 2026 Department(s): City Clerk’s Office Recommended Action: Appoint Enrique Adame to the Community Development Commission as the Ward 4 representative and administer the Oath of Office. AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 WAS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION 8. Appropriation Adjustment to Recognize Initial Disbursement of Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention Program Round 5 (Non-General Fund) Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: Approve appropriation adjustment to recognize $5,878,393 in funds from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in revenue account (no.12218002-52025 State Grant - Direct) and appropriate the same amount to expenditure account (no. 12218719-various) to address homelessness in the City of Santa Ana. (Requires five affirmative votes) MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua requested clarification regarding the intended use of the funding. Community Development Director Mike Garcia explained that there are two primary sources of state grant funding and outlined the application process. He confirmed that the city's application, submitted in January, was awarded in November and funds are now being recognized. Mayor Amezcua inquired about the allocation of funds to the Carnegie Navigation Center and the funding designated for foster youth. Director Garcia clarified that the funds will support shelter operations and city-led outreach initiatives. He specified that approximately $3.8 million is allocated to the navigation center and 10% of the HHAPP funds, roughly $550,000, for transitional youth who reside in the city shelter.     City Council 7 – 6 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 7 MARCH 18, 2025 Councilmember Lopez expressed support for the item and inquired whether the scope of work would remain consistent for the next round of funding. Director Garcia confirmed that the scope of work would largely remain the same for the next funding cycle. Councilmember Lopez requested that the scope of work be expanded for the next round to include support for moving expenses and landlord initiatives. MOTION: Mayor Amezcua moved to approve the recommended action for Item No. 8, seconded by Councilmember Lopez. The motion carried, 7-0, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER BACERRA, COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ, MAYOR AMEZCUA NONE NONE NONE Status: 7 – 0 – Pass MINUTES: Councilmember Penaloza left the meeting at 7:46 P.M. AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 WAS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION 9. Approve Appropriation Adjustment and Award a Construction Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Bristol-Tolliver Street Urban Greening Project (Project No. 24-6600) (Non-General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $1,500,000 in prior year fund balance in the Federal Clean Water Protection Fund, Prior Year Carryforward revenue account (No. 05717002-50001) and appropriate the same amount into the Federal Clean Water Protection Enterprise, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 05717640-66220). (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program to add $1,500,000 of Federal Clean Water Protection Enterprise funding for the Bristol-Tolliver Street Urban Greening Project (No. 24-6600).     City Council 7 – 7 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 8 MARCH 18, 2025 3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $4,581,808, which includes $3,808,800 for the construction contract, $392,128 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and $380,880 project contingency for unanticipated for unforeseen work. 4. Award a construction contract to Legion Contractors, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $3,808,800, for construction of the Bristol-Tolliver Street Urban Greening Project, for a term beginning March 18, 2025 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. 5. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2024-110 was filed with the Orange County Clerk- Recorder for the project. MINUTES: Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez spoke in support of the project. Councilmember Hernandez spoke in support of the project. Councilmember Lopez thanked the Neighborhood Association for their advocacy and spoke in support of the project. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez moved to approve the recommended action for Item No. 9, seconded by Councilmember Hernandez. The motion carried, 6-0-0-1, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER BACERRA, COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ, MAYOR AMEZCUA NONE NONE COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA Status: 6 – 0 – 0 – 1 – Pass 10.Approve Appropriation Adjustment and Award a Construction Contract to KYA Services, LLC for the Centennial Park Improvements Project (No. 22-2755) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $2,250,000 of accumulated General Fund account balance and appropriate the same amount into the PWA Services, Improvements Other Than Buildings (01117607-66220) expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes)     City Council 7 – 8 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 9 MARCH 18, 2025 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Capital Improvement Program to include an additional $6,241,000 in construction funds for the Centennial Park Improvements Project (No. 22-2755). 3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $6,241,000, which includes $5,941,000 for the construction contract and $300,000 for contract administration, inspection, and testing. 4. Award a construction contract to KYA Services, LLC, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $5,941,000, subject to change orders, for construction of the Centennial Park Improvements Project (No. 22-2755), for a term beginning March 18, 2025 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. 5. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER- 2025-15 was filed for the Centennial Park Improvements Project. AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 WAS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION 11.Construction Contract with Hardy & Harper, Inc. for the Rehabilitation of Civic Center Drive from Shelton Street to Flower Street Project (Project No. 25-6711) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Capital Improvement Program to include $500,000 in Civic Center Maintenance funds for the Civic Center Rehabilitation from Shelton Street to Flower Street Project, Project No. 25- 6711. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $1,144,000, which includes $915,000 for the construction contract, $137,000 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $92,000 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work due to the complexity and extensive scope of this project. 3. Award a construction contract to Hardy & Harper, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $915,000, subject to change orders, for construction of the Civic Center Rehabilitation (Shelton Street to Flower St.) Project (No. 25-6711), for a term beginning March 18, 2025 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2024-114 was filled for Project No. 25-6711.    City Council 7 – 9 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 10 MARCH 18, 2025 MINUTES: Councilmember Hernandez expressed support for the project and excitement for the enhancements to the Civic Center corridor. Mayor Amezcua asked for clarification regarding outreach. Public Works Director Nabil Saba explained the plans for community outreach and notification. MOTION: Councilmember Hernandez moved to approve the recommended action for Item No. 11, seconded by Mayor Amezcua. The motion carried, 5-0-0-2, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER BACERRA, COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ, MAYOR AMEZCUA NONE NONE COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA Status: 5 – 0 – 0 – 2 – Pass 12.Ground License Agreement for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities at Three Existing Cell Tower Sites at El Salvador Park, Jerome Park, and the Santa Ana Stadium Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Ground License Agreement with CCTM1 LLC for wireless telecommunication facilities on City property at El Salvador Park located at 1825 ¾ Civic Center Drive West beginning April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2035, with provision for three, five-year extension options, for total revenue, including all extensions, in the amount of $2,163,572 (Agreement No. A-2025-025). 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Ground License Agreement with CCTM1 LLC for wireless telecommunication facilities on City property at Jerome Park located at 2115 W. McFadden Avenue beginning April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2035, with provision for three, five-year extension options, for total revenue, including all extensions, in the amount of $2,045,426 (Agreement No. A-2025- 026).     City Council 7 – 10 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 11 MARCH 18, 2025 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Ground License Agreement with NCWPCS MPL 30 – Year Sites Tower Holdings LLC, by and through CCATT LLC, for wireless telecommunication facilities on City property at the Santa Ana Stadium located at 951 West 6th Street beginning April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2035, with provision for three, five-year extension options, for total revenue, including all extensions, in the amount of $1,202,913 (Agreement No. A-2025-027). 13.Agreements with JL Group, LLC; Kane, Ballmer & Berkman; Michael Raneses dba Michael Raneses Administrative Hearings; Nastich Law, APC; Palacios Law Office; Robert M. Snider, Attorney at Law; Serviam by Wright, LLP; and The ADR Coach, Inc. for Administrative Hearing Officer Services (Specification 24-127) (General & Non-General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with each of the eight firms listed below for Administrative Hearing Officer services on an as-needed basis, in a total aggregate amount not to exceed $2,770,000, for an initial three-year term beginning March 18, 2025 and expiring March 17, 2028, with provisions for one, two-year extension (Core Agreement No. A-2025-028). Firms Location JL Group, LLC Laguna Niguel, CA Kane, Ballmer & Berkman Los Angeles, CA Michael Raneses Administrative Hearings Tustin, CA Nastich Law, APC Berkeley, CA Palacios Law Office Riverside, CA Robert M. Snider, Attorney at Law Palm Desert, CA Serviam By Wright, LLP Irvine, CA The ADR Coach, Inc.Los Angeles, CA 14.Agreement with Charter Communications, LLC for Data and Video Communication Services (Specification 25-037) (General Fund and Non-General Fund) Department(s): Information Technology Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Charter Communications Operating, LLC (doing business as Spectrum) for data and video communications services, in an amount not to exceed $300,000 annually or $2,100,000 over the life of the agreement, for a four-year period beginning March 18, 2025 through March 17, 2029, with provisions for three, optional one-year renewals (Agreement No. A-2025-029). *END OF CONSENT CALENDAR**     City Council 7 – 11 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 12 MARCH 18, 2025 MINUTES: At 7:54 P.M., the Business Calendar was considered. 15.Early Direction for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Provide direction for preparation of the proposed FY2025- 26 budget. MINUTES: Acting Finance and Management Services Director Alex Trinidad provided a presentation regarding the Mid-Year Budget Update. Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez expressed support for improvements to the Senior Center, City jail, new bus shelters, code-blue upgrades, funding for future pension costs, city events, and arts initiative. He is in support of stadium upgrades and requested more information regarding the stadium improvement plan. Councilmember Lopez inquired about the Civic Center Plaza demolition plan, emphasizing the need to salvage artwork on the exterior of the State building. She expressed support for dedicated pension funding and suggested exploring revenue-generating options like private land leases or an enterprise fund for the conference complex. She requested further discussion and a cost-offset analysis regarding the proposed jail upgrades. She also proposed engaging local venue promoters in stadium design discussions and supported using one-time funds for street, sidewalk, and alley repairs, as well as park restroom renovations and playground shade structures. Councilmember Hernandez expressed his support for an equitable approach to budget adjustments across all departments. He supported setting aside $5 million of Measure X funds for reserves and utilizing one-time spending for revenue- generating projects, specifically investing in the Bristol and Edinger parking lot. He also expressed support for expanding the Senior Center to create community meeting spaces, upgrading the stadium to increase capacity and amenities for high-profile events, transferring county ownership of the Plaza of the Fountains, and salvaging and maintaining the artwork on the exterior of the State building. Councilmember Bacerra asked City staff to engage with state officials and request an extension for the state building demolition deadline. He requested more details regarding the proposed cost estimates for the Bristol and Edinger parking lot upgrades and recommended the allocation of at least $1 million for future pension obligations. He expressed support for the modernization of the jail and requested to see the proposed projects at the Senior Center. He requested a cost analysis for natural and artificial turf options at the stadium and inquired about the scope of additional improvements. BUSINESS CALENDAR     City Council 7 – 12 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 13 MARCH 18, 2025 Councilmember Phan expressed support for upgrades to the Bristol and Edinger parking lot, the Senior Center, and stadium expansion. She requested information regarding jail improvements and expected revenue, and expressed support for new bus shelters, code blue emergency system upgrades, and water upgrades. She also supported setting aside funds to cover future pension costs, expanding the annual Fiestas Patrias, and funding arts initiatives. Mayor Amezcua requested additional information regarding the Measure X Committee's proposals and expressed support for the Bristol and Edinger parking lot renovations. She raised concerns regarding the potential impact of proposed Senior Center renovations on the senior citizens who utilize the facility, emphasizing the need to ensure no services are diminished. She also expressed support for stadium expansion, jail improvements, new bus shelters, and code blue emergency system upgrades. Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez emphasized the need for the completion of the Cypress Fire Station and reconstruction of streets and sidewalks. He expressed support for investing in library services and programs, updating park concession stands, increasing economic development workforce, and establishing a mobile police station. He also advocated for an in-house construction crew for the city, traffic speed reduction efforts on Center and Elder streets, and the installation of a lighted crosswalk at the intersection of McFadden and Ross Streets. Councilmember Lopez expressed support for street improvements on River Lane, sidewalk repairs off Valencia, and speed reduction efforts on Lincoln. She advocated for the use of Measure X funds to create a fund for grant-dependent employees and expressed support of art initiatives and new bus shelters. She opposed reducing the budget for Movies at the Park and requested clarification on the proposed reduction. A discussion ensued regarding the Movies at the Park, Noche de Altares, and Juneteenth celebrations. Councilmember Hernandez expressed support for citywide events such as Fiestas Patrias and the Chicano Heritage Festival, suggesting the latter travel to different communities within the City. He also supported non-profit organizations managing Noche de Altares and Juneteenth events. He voiced support for art funding, code blue emergency system upgrades, and the use of one-time funding to repair Fifth Street, renovate the concession stand at El Salvador Park, build a crosswalk at Angels Park, hotel conversions in the Santa Anita neighborhood, and install stop signs on Sullivan between McFadden and First Streets. Councilmember Bacerra requested left turn signals at the intersections of Flower and MacArthur, as well as Greenville and MacArthur, and street lights on the west side of Bristol, between Gary and Alton, and on Harvey Avenue and Carol Avenue. He also requested a basketball court at Lillie King Park, expressed support for citywide speed reduction efforts, street repairs near the Hutton Center, and security     City Council 7 – 13 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 14 MARCH 18, 2025 cameras along the Alton bike trail, between Bristol and Orange Avenue. He requested the development of a plan for upgrades at fire stations. Councilmember Phan expressed support for maintaining the general fund reserve and advocated for repairs to Euclid Street, highlighting safety concerns. Mayor Amezcua thanked staff for conducting research on the potential effects of the new tariffs on sales tax. She expressed her hope that the city would be spared from any federal funding reductions and highlighted that the city’s budget cannot accommodate every single street repair requested by Council. City Manager Alvaro Nuñez stated that the city does not have sufficient funds to address all requests and emphasized the importance of collaborating with state and federal partners. Mayor Amezcua highlighted the shortage of police officers and expressed concern with a mobile department. She suggested installing traffic cameras at certain intersections as an alternative option. She expressed support for water improvements and reiterated that the city is operating within a very limited budget. Councilmember Lopez request clarification regarding the increases to Parks and Recreation fees. A conversation ensued regarding the Parks and Recreation fees. Mayor Amezcua stated she does not support an increase to park usage fees. She expressed support for funding future pension costs, maintaining the general fund reserve, and assisting local businesses with public relations to promote growth and retention. She also requested a discussion on revitalization efforts for downtown and other business districts, and inquired about the update on the Spanish version of the mySantaAna App. Deputy City Manager Sylvia Vazquez stated the app is pending a release date of May 30, 2025. City Manager Nuñez stated the app will be released both in Spanish and Vietnamese. Mayor Amezcua expressed opposition to moving the Chicano Heritage event to other communities in the city, highlighting safety concerns. Councilmember Bacerra requested a follow-up regarding CalTrans and their plans to maintain their portions of the city. Councilmember Phan expressed support for continuing to host the Chicano Heritage Festival at Centennial Park, citing logistical advantages. She expressed reservations regarding the proposed fund for grant-funded positions, noting that a safety net already exists at the state level through unemployment benefits.     City Council 7 – 14 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 15 MARCH 18, 2025 Councilmember Hernandez stated that El Salvador Park has seen a decrease in violence and emphasized the value of rotating the Chicano Heritage Festival to various locations to unite families and celebrate cultural pride. He suggested partnering with local organizations to highlight community histories, promoting both public safety and positive representation. Councilmember Lopez requested a more efficient and supportive environment for businesses in the city and a review of current processes to eliminate unnecessary obstacles. Mayor Amezcua requested information about the new business center located on the first floor of City Hall. City Manager Nuñez explained that the office's purpose is to offer direct assistance to business owners seeking help with navigating the city's processes, including obtaining new business licenses and opening new businesses, and help minimize delays. Councilmember Phan requested information on park lighting and recommended additional lighting at Centennial Park to allow for extended hours for sports activities and improve its suitability for city events. Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez supported the implementation of business liaisons at the new business center to provide support to new and existing business owners across the city. Mayor Amezcua asked for information regarding the in-house construction crew and the status of the Cypress Fire Station. City Manager Nuñez confirmed staff will be presenting on the proposed in-house construction crew and the Cypress Fire Station at a future City Council meeting. Mayor Amezcua stated that creating a safety net for grant-funded positions would not be financially sustainable. She noted that in the event of federal funding cuts, staff would propose budget reductions. She emphasized the need for careful financial management and prioritization, focusing on essential services such as street maintenance, sidewalk repairs, tree care, and overall quality of life. She thanked staff for their budget proposal efforts and encouraged residents to complete the city survey, emphasizing the importance of individual input. RECESS MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua recessed the City Council meeting at 9:22 P.M. RECONVENE MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua reconvened the City Council meeting at 9:36 P.M.    City Council 7 – 15 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 16 MARCH 18, 2025 16.Parking Enterprise Fund Updates for Meters and Structures Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve parking rates for City-owned parking structures to $2.00 per hour with annual increases of $0.50 per hour until a maximum of $3.00 per hour is attained. 2. Direct staff to prepare a Resolution establishing parking rates for the City-owned parking structures and reaffirming the City Manager authority to modify future parking structure rates after the third annual increase as needed. 3. Approve the parking meter rates to $2.50 per hour with annual increases of $0.50 per hour until a maximum of $3.50 per hour is attained. 4. Direct staff to amend the meter ordinance establishing parking meter rates and hours of operation, eliminating metered parking fronting residential in the Willard Neighborhood, and authorizing the City Manager to modify future meter rates after the third annual increase as needed, to mirror the authority of the City- owned parking structures. MINUTES: Community Development Director Mike Garcia provided a presentation regarding the Parking Enterprise Fund 27. Councilmember Bacerra emphasized the need to generate revenue to support the Clean and Safe program. He requested that staff develop different revenue models that incorporate rates based on peak time usage, rather than relying on flat rates. He expressed concern regarding discrepancies between the reported peak time data presented and information received previously. A discussion ensued to clarify the precise timeframe defining "peak time" within city parking structures. MOTION: Councilmember Bacerra moved to approve city-owned parking structure rates of $1/hour during non-peak periods, with a $0.50 annual increase until a maximum of $2/hour is reached. During peak periods, defined as 5pm to 1am Thursday through Sunday, the rate would be $2/hour; approve curbside parking rates of $3/hour, with a $0.50 annual increase until a maximum of $4/hour is reached; direct staff to return within 90 days with plans and contracts for removing coin-operated meters and installing pay stations in downtown areas; direct staff to prepare resolutions establishing the new parking rates for city-owned structures, and reaffirming the City Manager's authority to modify parking structure rates after the third annual increase, with a requirement to report such actions to the Council; and direct staff to amend the meter ordinance, establishing curb side parking rates and hours of operations, eliminating meters in the Willard neighborhood, and     City Council 7 – 16 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 17 MARCH 18, 2025 authorizing the City manager to modify future curbside rates after the third annual increase as needed to mirror the authority of the city owned parking structures and reporting such actions to the Council as receive and file. Motion failed for lack of a second. MINUTES: Councilmember Bacerra emphasized the importance of capitalizing on peak period demand to maximize revenue. He advocated for lower off-peak rates to incentivize parking and support local businesses. He reminded the Council that revenue generation is required to fund the downtown Clean and Safe program. Councilmember Hernandez expressed support for the removal of meters in the Willard neighborhood, specifically in front of residences, and parking permits granting exemptions to meter parking, as well as the removal of meters north of Tenth Street. He also supported a $0.50 increase to parking rates at both city- owned structures and metered locations and proposed amending the hours of operation for metered parking to end at 6:00 P.M. to allow for a more business- friendly environment. A discussion ensued regarding the proposed amendments and the original motion. Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez voiced support for the removal of parking meters in the Willard neighborhood as well as an annual review of parking and meter rates, rather than implementing a continuous yearly increase. Councilmember Lopez expressed support for the removal of meters in the Willard Neighborhood and requested clarification on whether adjustments to parking structure rates fall within the City Manager's purview. City Manager Alvaro Nuñez confirmed that the adjustment of rates for parking structures falls within purview of the City Manager. Councilmember Lopez requested that the City Manager maintain authority over parking structure rate adjustments. MOTION: Councilmember Lopez moved to limit the current discussion to matters concerning parking meters only, seconded by Mayor Amezcua. Motion was subsequently rescinded. MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua expressed concern regarding the current operating budget's deficit, emphasizing the potential loss of the Clean and Safe program and downtown holiday decorations if revenue generation is not maintained. She inquired about the personnel costs associated with parking structures and meters. Director Garcia stated that the personnel costs amount to $600,000. A discussion ensued regarding the personnel costs and the City Manager's Office purview over parking structures.     City Council 7 – 17 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 18 MARCH 18, 2025 Councilmember Lopez rescinded her previous motion and instead recommended continuing the item to a future meeting date. Mayor Amezcua expressed concerns regarding issuing parking permits to residents in the affected area. City Manager Nuñez clarified that the recommendation from staff would be to remove all meters from in front of residential properties. MOTION: Councilmember Lopez moved to continue Item No. 16 to bring it back in 30-days with parking meter information only, seconded by Mayor Amezcua. MINUTES: Councilmember Phan questioned the separation of parking meter and parking structure discussions, suggesting they be addressed together. She advocated for the Council to participate in the decision-making process alongside the City Manager. She requested amending the current motion to include the parking structures and requested a more detailed, comprehensive presentation. Councilmember Lopez expressed opposition to the proposed amendments to the motion. She stated that parking structures fall within the City Manager's purview and suggested a staff report for future Council review of parking meter issues only. Additionally, she requested detailed information on community outreach regarding the transition to digital meters. City Attorney Sonia Carvalho clarified that a 2013 resolution authorized the City Manager to establish and regulate city parking facilities and set rates. She advised that any new direction should include rescinding or amending this resolution. Councilmember Phan proposed a sub-motion to direct staff to return with all requested information, including detailed visuals and a draft resolution. Councilmember Bacerra seconded the sub-motion with a comment, directing staff to also prepare a resolution establishing parking rates for city-owned structures and reaffirming the City Manager's authority to modify rates after the third year. A discussion ensued regarding the recommendations to staff concerning the resolution and the City Manager's authority over parking structures. Councilmember Bacerra explained that the current situation requires Council involvement due to the inadequacy of existing rates. He supported Councilmember Phan's motion, agreeing that the discussions should occur concurrently and in public.     City Council 7 – 18 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 19 MARCH 18, 2025 SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Councilmember Phan moved to direct staff to return with all requested information for both parking structures and parking meters, including detailed visuals and a draft resolution, seconded by Councilmember Bacerra. The motion failed, 3-3, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER BACERRA, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN, MAYOR AMEZCUA COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ NONE COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA Status: 3 – 3 – 0 – 1 – Fail Motion fails due to tie. MOTION: Councilmember Lopez moved to continue Item No. 16 to bring it back in 30-days with parking meter information only, seconded by Mayor Amezcua. The motion carried, 4-2, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ, MAYOR AMEZCUA COUNCILMEMBER BACERRA, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN NONE COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA Status: 4 – 2 – 0 – 1 – Pass 17.Boards and Commissions Members Appointments, Reappointments, Holdovers, and Removals Department(s): City Clerk’s Office, City Attorney’s Office Recommended Action: 1. Review Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-236 pertaining to Appointive Boards and Commissions, Appointments, Removals, Vacancies, and Term. 2. Provide direction to staff. MINUTES: City Clerk Jennifer L. Hall provided a presentation regarding the boards and commissions members appointments, reappointments, holdovers, and removals. Councilmember Bacerra stated the staff report did not include the wording “that except as otherwise provided in this section” regarding the terms of removal and reappointments, and asked for clarification regarding a time in 2019 where the     City Council 7 – 19 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 20 MARCH 18, 2025 Ward 4 roster of commissioners was cleared versus this 2025 situation. City Attorney Sonia Carvalho clarified the code section regarding appointment and removal, and explained the holdover provision is to avoid the loss of commissioners with each election. Councilmember Bacerra recommended establishing a deadline for councilmembers to submit their nominations for commissioners within 90 days and that failure to nominate will result in a vacant seat. Councilmember Hernandez spoke regarding the holdover provision and the action of the Council at the last City Council meeting, and encouraged residents to apply to serve as commissioners. MOTION: Councilmember Hernandez moved to keep the holdover provisions, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez. MINUTES: Councilmember Phan spoke regarding the holdover language, middle ground, and suggested a deadline on the holdover language. Councilmember Bacerra questioned the reaffirming of the commissioner. City Clerk Hall clarified the reappointment terms and processes. City Attorney Carvalho elaborated on the difficulty of the holdover language and affirmed an ordinance can be made to modify the holdover language. Commissioner Lopez expressed the difficulty of holdovers and recruiting commissioners. SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Councilmember Lopez moved to receive and file Item No. 17, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez. MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua expressed concern with previous possible changes to the Personnel Board and stated that rules need to be applied equally. City Attorney Carvalho emphasized the importance of council members maintaining neutrality in the selection of commissioners. Councilmember Phan supported establishing a 90-day deadline for reappointment nominations, with failure to nominate resulting in a vacant seat. She also noted that the removal of a commissioner can be added to future agendas if needed. SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Councilmember Phan moved to bring the item back for consideration and include an amendment that continues the holdover but requires a new nomination within 90-days of the swearing in of the Councilmember; failure to nominate and receive an affirmative appointment within the 90-days will result in a vacancy of that seat, seconded by     City Council 7 – 20 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 21 MARCH 18, 2025 Councilmember Bacerra. The motion failed, 3-3, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER BACERRA, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN , MAYOR AMEZCUA COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ NONE COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA Status: 3 – 3 – 0 – 1 – Fail Motion fails due to tie. SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Councilmember Lopez moved to receive and file Item No. 17, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez. The motion carried, 4-2, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ COUNCILMEMBER BECERRA, MAYOR AMEZCUA NONE COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA Status: 4 – 2 – 0 – Pass **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTED ITEMS 18.Discuss and consider directing the City Manager to prepare a resolution expressing City support for the Santa Ana Unified School District Graduate Profile by formally recognizing its importance and aligning city resources to reinforce its key attributes. – Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez MINUTES: Councilmember Vazquez presented the Graduate Profile Resolution model to establish a partnership with graduating high school students from Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD), aiming to secure employment opportunities by utilizing their internships and program experiences that prepare them for job roles within the community. Councilmember Hernandez spoke in support of the item. Mayor Amezcua stated she would not be supporting the item due to the recent SAUSD layoffs. Councilmember Bacerra stated he would not be supporting the item due to the recent SAUSD layoffs.    City Council 7 – 21 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 22 MARCH 18, 2025 Councilmember Lopez expressed her support for the students and questioned what the City’s resources are being used for and the outcome. Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez expanded on the goal of the District Graduate Profile, emphasizing the creation of diverse job opportunities and internship placements for students. He advocated for connecting city and district resources to support and showcase youth programs, and partnering with businesses to provide employment and hands-on experience to student. MOTION: At 11:08 P.M., Councilmember Phan moved to continue discussion and consideration of the remainder of the agenda, seconded by Mayor Amezcua. The motion carried, 6-0, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER BACERRA, COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ, COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER PHAN, MAYOR PRO TEM VAZQUEZ, MAYOR AMEZCUA NONE NONE COUNCILMEMBER PENALOZA Status: 6 – 0 – 0 – 0 – Pass MINUTES: Councilmember Phan expressed support in the City and youth engagement within the workforce and suggested the resolution include all neighboring school districts. Mayor Amezcua spoke in support of Councilmember Phan’s suggestions. RECESS MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua recessed the City Council meeting and convened the Special Housing Authority meeting at 11:12 P.M. RECONVENE MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua adjourned the Special Housing Authority meeting and reconvened the City Council meeting to order at 11:14 P.M. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS MINUTES: City Manager Alvaro Nuñez shared details regarding the City’s budget and encouraged the community to participate in the budget survey to provide input. He shared planning efforts for the Civic Center and the City’s sponsorship of a real estate competition between Chapman University and UC Irvine students and highlighted upcoming events: the Grow Conference with the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce on     City Council 7 – 22 4/1/2025 CITY COUNCIL 23 MARCH 18, 2025 March 27th, the Sahuayo Business Expo on March 28th, and the Santa Ana Fun Run 5K on May 17th. COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended. 1. March 9-13, 2025 Mayor Valerie Amezcua – NLC Congressional City Conference, Washington D.C. MINUTES: Councilmember Lopez thanked the residents who attended office hours at Fischer Park and announced the next session is on April 12. She expressed interest in the Adopt-a-Lot program. Councilmember Hernandez left the meeting at 11:18 P.M. Councilmember Phan invited everyone to attend the Same Day Solution Fair, hosted by Supervisor Sarmiento on March 27th at 4300 Westminster Ave., 92703. She expressed her excitement for the 5k Fun Run on May 17th. Mayor Pro Tem Vazquez shared that parking rates are $20–$25 at the Third & Broadway structure, which is not city owned. He met with the Work Site Center to discuss job programs and the need for more industry partners, met with a rent control group, and expressed interest in meeting with the Economic Development team. Mayor Amezcua, pursuant to AB1234, announced her travel to Washington D.C. She thanked the Cal Optima Board for awarding the City of Santa Ana the Street Medicine Program. She announced Coffee with the Mayor on March 22nd at the Boys and Girls Club and a Neighborhood Association meeting March 25th at the SAPD Community Room. She inquired about ICE activity in the City. Police Chief Robert Rodriguez stated there were no known ICE raids in the City. ADJOURNMENT – Adjourn the City Council meeting. MINUTES: Mayor Amezcua adjourned the meeting in memory of Deputy Sheriff Hector Cuevas, Jr. at 11:24 P.M. Respectfully submitted: ___________________________ Jennifer L. Hall, CMC City Clerk    City Council 7 – 23 4/1/2025     City Council 8 – 1 4/1/2025     City Council 8 – 2 4/1/2025     City Council 8 – 3 4/1/2025     City Council 8 – 4 4/1/2025     City Council 8 – 5 4/1/2025     City Council 8 – 6 4/1/2025     City Council 8 – 7 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 10 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Ten-Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 Moratorium Extension (Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Moratorium) AGENDA TITLE Ten-Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 Extension of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), regarding a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Moratorium) RECOMMENDED ACTION Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 on May 21, 2024, regarding a moratorium extension of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Moratorium). GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, the purpose of this staff report is to provide a written report no less than ten (10) days prior to the expiration of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 describing the measures the City has taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of Ordinance No. NS-3064. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064, which establishes a ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days extension period of a moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84), also known as the Transit Zoning Code (commonly referred to as the “Transit Zoning Code” or “TZC”) while City staff researches appropriate permanent regulations and determines whether an additional extension, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), is necessary.     City Council 10 – 1 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Conditions which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium Extension) April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 1 2 Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 shall have no further force and effect ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days from the date of its adoption, unless, after a report during the TZC moratorium extension period and a public hearing, the City Council members, again by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend the Ordinance for up to an additional twelve (12) months beyond the additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days of the initial Ordinance extension. Based on the adoption date of May 21, 2024, the Ordinance is scheduled to expire on April 15, 2025. City staff continues to analyze and develop permanent regulations to address industrial business uses within the TZC. Staff continues to research, obtain community feedback, and work with planning and legal environmental consultants to prepare recommendations for the City Council’s consideration, following the Planning Commission’s recommendation to do so on March 6, 2025. Such actions may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would address industrial land uses in the TZC. DISCUSSION Background On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, establishing a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the TZC. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the TZC. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the moratorium. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code as necessary to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action was necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. During the moratorium period, the City has not issued permits that have resulted in the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC. Staff held a work-study session at the Planning Commission on February 10, 2025, which was open to the public. During the work-study session, Planning Commission members     City Council 10 – 2 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Conditions which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium Extension) April 1, 2025 Page 3 4 9 1 2 and members of the community posed additional questions and provided input on topics of key importance surrounding land use, code violations, the role of outside agencies and their enforcement, and financial and legal implications that required staff to carry out additional research. On February 24, 2025 and March 6, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the TZC ordinance and map amendments with clarifying edits. However, this recommendation is advisory and the City Council retains the ultimate authority to approve, modify, or reject the proposed amendments after their own review and consideration of all presented information, including the Planning Commission's recommendations, staff reports, and public input. Measures Taken Review of City Department Activities During the initial 45-day moratorium and the moratorium extension of ten (10) month and fifteen (15) days, City staff conducted interagency meetings that included representatives from multiple City departments: the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Additionally, engagement with agencies such as the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD), Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities interface with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that application of the moratorium affects up to 127 industrial businesses in the TZC. Of the affected businesses, approximately three have active applications for permits, primarily seeking to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties. City staff has continued to review public safety data from SAPD and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) to assess community concerns regarding emergency responses in the TZC. SAPD records show a total of 18,736 calls for service between March 2023 and July 2024, with 226 of those occurring between April and July 2024 within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. These calls encompassed a wide range of incidents, including patrol checks, disturbances, and traffic-related issues. Notably, 1,909 calls involved collisions, vehicle impoundments, domestic violence, and SAMC violations. OCFA data from 2022 to August 2024 indicates 238 calls for advanced life support emergencies. In 2022, 29 calls were related to respiratory issues, chest pain, and cardiac arrest, with a subsequent 7% increase in health-related calls in 2023. While the data reflects a broad spectrum of emergency responses, the concentration of industrial businesses in the TZC raises the possibility that some of these calls, particularly those related to respiratory issues and traffic incidents, may be influenced by industrial operations.     City Council 10 – 3 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Conditions which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium Extension) April 1, 2025 Page 4 4 9 1 2 Currently, City staff has an internal process established that continues to track and monitor incoming notices of compliance or notices of violations from outside regulatory agencies issued to a particular business/operator. City Code Enforcement activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance continue being monitored at these facilities. Code Enforcement data show enforcement activity within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the moratorium, 16 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. Recent code enforcement complaints on properties in the Logan neighborhood involve complaints for recurring unpermitted work and land use violations that involve large commercial vehicles blocking street access and impacting nearby residents. In the past 12 months, the Code Enforcement Division conducted investigations at over 35 commercial and industrial properties within the TZC. These investigations led to administrative citations, ongoing enforcement actions, and onsite meetings with business owners. The City of Santa Ana Code Enforcement Division is currently addressing 21 open code enforcement violations or compliance reviews specifically involving industrial businesses within the TZC area. This activity demonstrates the City’s direct involvement in overseeing these businesses to mitigate potential environmental and public health risks. Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies To broaden the analysis beyond the City's local land use impacts, City staff have received public records requested of compliance status, violation records, and violation status of outside regulatory agencies, and have contacted staff from external regulatory agencies such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), Santa Ana Regional Quality Water Control Board (SARQWCB), the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA), California Environmental Reporting System (CERS), and others responsible for issuing regulatory permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Specifically, these agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities, and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities and have received current data requests for sites located within the TZC zoning district. Data from outside regulatory agencies assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial     City Council 10 – 4 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Conditions which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium Extension) April 1, 2025 Page 5 4 9 1 2 businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Records show SCAQMD issued two notices to comply with one industrial business on August 2023 and April 2024 for failure to maintain records, such as temperature graphs, poundage logs, and source test data. SCAQMD issued several permits to construct and to operate to the new operator of this same facility, which is currently in compliance with SCAQMD. Two notices of violation were issued to one industrial business for operating a paint spray booth without a valid permit to operate from SCAQMD. The report from the SARWQCB from 2024 shows three (3) active industrial business in the TZC in violation of their permit for providing a late report or incomplete and/or insufficient information for their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). In March 2025, one of the three businesses with active violations concluded a financial settlement directly with the SARWQCB agency. Public records from the CUPA for Orange County, spanning 2022-2024, reveal a pattern of non-compliance with environmental and hazardous materials regulations among industrial businesses within the TZC. While some 2023 violations related to Hazardous Material Business Plan staff training and reporting were later corrected, current records indicate four businesses still have multiple open violations. These ongoing issues include non-compliance with documentation for hazardous waste transportation and disposal, as well as deficiencies in industrial stormwater reporting requirements. These violations highlight potential risks to public health and the environment. Air emission complaints continue to be reported to SCAQMD. These complaints included one involving black smoke and another regarding unpermitted soil vapor extraction equipment onsite. SCAQMD staff has clarified that for air quality complaints they receive, their inspector is required to be physically present to observe the activity from the facility described in the complaint to determine if the complaint warrants further investigation or enforcement action in accordance with SCAQMD Rules 401 (Visible Emissions), 402 (Public Nuisance), and 403 (Fugitive Dust). Therefore, although community members continue to share concerns with City and SCAQMD staff, the turnaround time for an SCAQMD inspector to be physically present at an SCAQMD-permitted facility to investigate an air quality complaint, especially if a complaint is reported after working hours or on weekends, is ineffective in addressing the immediate needs of the community. Public Engagement and Planning Commission Recommendation Following City Council's extension of the TZC moratorium on May 21, 2024, City staff have been developing permanent regulations for the TZC district for the City Council’s consideration. Leading up to the special Planning Commission meeting held on March 6,     City Council 10 – 5 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Conditions which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium Extension) April 1, 2025 Page 6 4 9 1 2 2025, City staff engaged in a comprehensive outreach effort regarding TZC regulations, holding 20 meetings in various formats with affected stakeholders. This included: •Direct engagement through eight individual and group meetings with business owners and brokers, •Two focus group meetings with TZC business owners, •Community outreach involving two neighborhood/resident group meetings, •Two City-hosted TZC (SD-84) meetings: the October 22, 2024 City Informational Meeting and the March 3, 2025 Community Meeting, •Three site visits at the request of businesses, and •Three Planning Commission meetings (February 10, 2025 Study Session and February 24/March 6 Public Hearings). This extensive engagement aimed to gather diverse input for the development of permanent TZC regulations. To proactively ensure important communications reached all stakeholders, City staff mailed notices to all property owners and occupants, comprising 3,599 addresses, within the Transit Zoning Code area for each of the following meetings: the October 22, 2024 City Informational Meeting, the Planning Commission February 10, 2025 Study Session and February 24, 2025 Public Hearing notice, and the City Council April 1, 2025 Public Hearing Notice. City staff from the Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section of the Planning Division continue to coordinate with City departments, external regulatory agencies, and staff from other federal and state agencies to identify additional resources available to enhance deeper awareness of pollution exposure in disadvantaged communities, long-term health effects, and immediate solutions. The NIES team has held meetings and discussions with staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and CalEPA Environmental Justice Team to identify opportunities for linking environmental justice (EJ) resources and support to the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Next Steps To address polluting industrial uses in the TZC during the ten (10) month and fifteen (15) day extension of the moratorium approved by Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064, staff continues interagency coordination efforts, stakeholder outreach, and data analysis to inform permanent code amendments to the TZC zoning district that will be presented to City Council for their consideration. Permanent code amendments to address incompatible land uses in the TZC may include a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would permanently address industrial land uses in the TZC (SD-84).     City Council 10 – 6 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Conditions which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3064 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium Extension) April 1, 2025 Page 7 4 9 1 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 2. April 16, 2024 City Council Staff Report (without attachments) 3. Ten-Day Written Report – May 7, 2024 4. Adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3064 5. May 21, 2024 City Council Staff Report (without attachments) Submitted By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Acting Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 10 – 7 4/1/2025 ORDINANCE NO. NS-3063 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATOR IUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCA TION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SP ECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has the police power pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, to make and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urgency ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and WHEREAS, Specific Development No. 84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010; and WHEREAS, upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; and WHEREAS, the goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian­ oriented development framework to support the addition of new and enhancement of existing communities through transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and desig n standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and WHEREAS, industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhood s in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern Ordinance No. NS -3063 Page 1 of 8 Exhibit 1 - Adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063     City Council 10 – 8 4/1/2025 zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and WHEREAS, the TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were converted to the mixed­ use zones allowed by the TZC; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called "disadvantaged communities", in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in Ap ril 2022; and WHEREAS, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana's General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and WHEREAS, as required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all of its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and WHEREAS, numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and WHEREAS, the industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and Ordinance No. NS -3063 Page 2 of 8     City Council 10 – 9 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, the Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican­ American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century and WHEREAS, the construction of Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in a number of families being displaced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, in the 1970s a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as "disadvantaged communities" by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and WHEREAS, the updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations-both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and WHEREAS, there are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City's Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC's existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and WHEREAS, in the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by ex ternal regulatory agencies such as South Ordinance No. NS -3063 Page 3 of 8     City Council 10 – 10 4/1/2025 Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency -Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, in the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency -Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, there is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial lan d uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very-low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, there is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor's yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, The City Council approved a contract with Moore, lacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City's Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and Ordinance No. NS -3063 Page 4 of 8     City Council 10 – 11 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area; and WHEREAS, the policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and WHEREAS, given these concerns, the City Council hereby directs that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district; and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that continu ing to issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property located in the TZC for the purposes of industrial business use, prior to the City's completion of its study of the potential impact of such uses, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements in the TZC area is thus necessary; and WHEREAS, if an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: (1)Adversely impacts surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; (2)Adversely impacts sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; (3)Conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; (4)Long-term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses; and (5)Risks to the public health, safety and welfare of the City; and WHEREAS, prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare requires the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance. The absence of this urgency ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which may be adopted by the City; industrial business uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated updates and revisions to the Code. Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and implementation would create Ordinance No. NS -3063 Page 5 of 8     City Council 10 – 12 4/1/2025 impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the City Council, in adopting this ordinance, has found to be unacceptable; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds, determines and declares that the current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of the city and its citizens necessitates the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance by a four-fifths vote of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15061(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of uses in the zoning district. Section 3. California Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Section 4. The City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858, hereby adopts this urgency ordinance establishing a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement , establishment, modification, relocation or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC while City staff researches appropriate regulations and whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. For the purposes of this Ordinance, "industrial uses" includes those specified by Divisions 18 and 19 of Article Il l of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and by Section 41-2007 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and Table 2A in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84). Section 5. This ordinance shall have no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from the date of its adoption; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days and subsequently, after public hearing, the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance one more year.     City Council 10 – 13 4/1/2025 Section 6. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of Chapter 1 of the Code. Section 7. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 8. This ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED this 16 th day of Apri l, 2024. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By:&�f\-.£�Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers Amezcua, Bacerra, Hernande.Lopez, Penaloza Phan, Vazquez (7) NOES: Councilmembe rs -=-N=oc.:...;n=e_,_(-=-0,._) __________ _ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers _N_o _n-'-e�(_0�) __________ _ NOT PR ESENT: Councilmembers -'-N'""'o-'--'n"""e ..... (0 ...... ).___ _________ _ Ordinance No. NS -3063 Page 7 of 8     City Council 10 – 14 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -3063 Page 8 of 8     City Council 10 – 15 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 28 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 16, 2024 TOPIC: Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) AGENDA TITLE Urgency Interim Ordinance Pursuant to Section 65858(a) of the California Government Code Adopting a 45-day Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), adopting a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 zoning district. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff is recommending adoption of an urgency interim ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), also known as a moratorium, to address current and immediate threats to public health, safety, and welfare, due to growing code Exhibit 2 - April 16, 2024 City Council Staff Report (without attachments)     City Council 10 – 16 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 2 enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts within the Specific Development No. 84 zoning district (commonly referred to as the “Transit Zoning Code” or “TZC”). Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, and surrounding areas, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is straining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods. If adopted, the urgency ordinance would establish a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC while City staff researches appropriate regulations and determines whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. The urgency ordinance shall have no further force and effect 45-days from the date of its adoption, unless, after a report on the first 45 days and a public hearing, the City Council members, again by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial extension period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days. DISCUSSION Background Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code) The Specific Development No. 84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”), is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The TZC includes the Civic Center, Downtown, and the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and in established residential communities. As shown in Exhibit 2, the TZC is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. Prior to the implementation of the TZC, the area consisted of a wide range of civic, commercial, industrial, and residential land uses under a variegated amalgamation of zoning districts and their regulations. In June 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2804, adopting various entitlements approving the creation of the TZC. The TZC established a transit- supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and     City Council 10 – 17 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 3 design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. Moreover, the TZC provided new zoning for all of the properties contained within its boundary with the exception of those properties zoned Light Industrial (M1) or Heavy Industrial (M2). These M1 and M2 properties retained their existing zoning, but were covered by two overlay zones that allows for the option of future mixed-use development to be exercised at the discretion of the property owner. In support of the TZC, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. In these industrial overlay areas, however, the resulting new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts between the new General Plan land use designations and the industrial overlays. Since 2010, and specifically in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, these industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, undergone expansions or intensifications, and created numerous land use conflicts and disturbances that affect surrounding residential communities. Specifically, in the Logan neighborhood alone, these land uses create quality of life, health and safety, and other trespass issues for residential properties that often directly abut these industrial land uses. These issues include odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts that have taken place for nearly a decade and a half, despite the change in underlying General Plan land use designation. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required. Necessary amendments include the creation of new zoning district designations and corresponding development standards; updates to the definitions, signage, nonconforming, and parking sections; reorganization of the entire Zoning Code to a more user-friendly format; and new standards to reflect new land use trends, economic development trends, and land use goals of the City. MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area.     City Council 10 – 18 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 4 Historically Disadvantaged Communities Prior to the adoption of the City’s Transit Zoning Code (TZC), the City permitted industrial uses within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools. By way of context, the Logan neighborhood represents the oldest Mexican and Mexican-American neighborhoods of Santa Ana and one of the oldest barrios in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century. Moreover, as a neighborhood, the area was established before the modern practice of separating impactful land uses, also known as zoning. The Logan neighborhood itself originated as early as 1886 and was largely settled by 1900, before the practice of zoning was enshrined by Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926. By then, the neighborhood comprised residential, industrial, commercial, and related land uses, with issues further exacerbated by rail lines, fuel storage depots, and the construction of the Santa Ana Freeway between 1947 and 1956. Comprehensive data analysis and mapping tools generated by the California EPA (CalEPA), the Center for Diseases Control/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), the U.S. EPA (EPA), and California Healthy Places Index (HPI), present concerning information regarding environmental conditions impacting residents in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Exhibit 3 of this report references EJ maps showing rankings of at least 90% or higher in heavy air pollution attributed to indicators describing exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Diesel Particulate Matter, Air Toxics Cancer Risk, Toxic Releases to Air, and Hazardous Water Proximity exposures. Multiple sources of environmental exposure and pollution burden into communities of color, including the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, presents an alarming set of challenges and decline in healthy community conditions that will impact their quality of life and life expectancy with continued heavy industrial uses nearby. Implementation of Senate Bill (SB 1000), City General Plan Update (GPU), and new Environmental Justice (EJ) Policies and Actions SB 1000 went into effect in 2016, requiring local governments to address pollution and other hazards that disproportionately impact low-income and communities of color within their jurisdiction as a way to proactively plan for and address environmental concerns when developing and updating components of the General Plan. During this period, the City began and extended its comprehensive public engagement process for the General Plan Update through its adoption in April 2022. The City and community worked to ensure that the new General Plan included SB 1000 requirements of addressing environmental justice in local general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing     City Council 10 – 19 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 5 harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options. Of note, the new General Plan mixed-use land use designations in the TZC area were largely left intact, including those in the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods, when the General Plan Update was adopted in 2022. Santa Ana’s current General Plan champions implementation policies, including 77 EJ actions that address air quality, noxious uses, water safety, residential lead exposure in the soil, and other environmental public health conditions. City staff, over the past year, have worked on a process to create an EJ Action Committee of EJ cluster area residents, community-based organizations (CBOs), and County and City staff representatives, to guide implementation and resource investments to protect neighborhoods from experiencing any further environmental harm. For the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, incompatible land uses allowed from past zoning decisions, including the industrial overlay zones, have perpetuated the practices of locating industrial uses or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color. Code Enforcement and Immediate Ongoing Issues In the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, the Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. These violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby. Since June 2023, the TZC communities have experienced a marked increase in impacts stemming from the irreconcilable industrial and residential land use conflicts in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Residents in the TZC have increased their reporting of complaints and public health concerns to City staff regarding emitted contaminants and zoning violations from industrial businesses in the neighborhoods. Concerns that range from air pollution and smoke, toxic release exposures, idling trucks on residential streets, lead exposure, illegal storage, unpermitted uses, loud noise at night, and other property maintenance pose an immediate public health threat that is straining public resources to continuously investigate and address these matters. Six months ago, a fire incident at Macera Crematory, located at 1020 Fuller Street, alarmed neighbors at 9:18 p.m. on August 29, 2023. Neighbors shared with City officials disturbing video of high flames escaping the stack on the rooftop, the screeching noise that went nonstop for 10 minutes, and what they described as a foul odor attributed to the fire. As City staff     City Council 10 – 20 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 6 followed up with external regulatory agencies issuing permits to operate this facility, and quickly, staff observed the limitations from regulatory agencies and their compartmentalized processes to investigate and act on enforcement measures. Since 2022, the City has enhanced community services by restructuring its Planning Division to contain a Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section, which oversees, among other functions, environmental justice efforts in Santa Ana and regional coordination to address such issues. Despite this restructuring, it is now well documented that the NIES section’s coordination with external regulatory agencies has not resulted in a favorable outcome in enforcement by responsible external agencies such as South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Department of Consumer Affairs Cemetery and Funeral Bureau (CFB), and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) in many of these investigations. In response, the City has adopted new regulations such as a Noxious Uses Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS-3044, adopted June 20, 2023), which amends Zoning Ordinance No. 2023-01 that includes: a notification requirement to the City by the property owner to obtain a permit from a regulatory public agency; a requirement of a 1,000 linear foot distance buffer measured from the outermost boundary of the subject property; and a conditional use permit requirement from a regulatory public agency to handle, store, emit, or discharge particulate materials, exhaust emissions, or regulated compounds, or chemicals near a public park, school (K-12), or property zoned for residential purposes. City staff have also researched commercial real estate acquisition data and current for sale properties to identify any trends that could potentially generate an increase in the application of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance for proposed or expanded industrial uses. From September 2022 to date, seven properties, primarily industrial businesses, sold and three of those businesses (800-808 E. Washington Avenue, 1045 Fuller Street, and 923 N. Logan Street) are located in the Logan neighborhood. Currently, two large properties are in the market for multifamily and land types located in the TZC. Environmental Justice (EJ)/Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Profile: Logan and Lacy neighborhood impacts A demographic profile of the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods combined represent a population of 5,907, which encompass 1,564 households, a median household income of $56,864, average household size is nearly four persons, median age is 27 years, per- capita income is $23,495, and 74% comprise renter-occupied units based on demographic forecasts for 2023. Nearly 25% of the population is under 14 years of age and 14% are 55 years of age and older. Nearly 3% of the population attended up to 12th grade with no diploma, over 31% are high school graduates, and nearly 97% of the working population over 16 years of age are employed. This data illustrates that the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90% or     City Council 10 – 21 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 7 greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model. Failure to address ongoing irreconcilable land use conflicts that are the target of this moratorium will further exacerbate the ongoing demographic and environmental justice challenges that these two neighborhoods within the TZC have grappled with since their founding. General Plan Inconsistency with Present Land Uses Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The purpose of the interim ordinance is to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from these irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC, during the time that City staff analyzes and prepares an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC. Such an evaluation will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether industrial uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and, if not, proceed with an ordinance and zoning map amendment to the district. During the interim moratorium period, City staff will not issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property for the purposes of industrial business use in the TZC. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT This ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of uses in the zoning district. FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.     City Council 10 – 22 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 8 EXHIBITS 1. Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) 2. Transit Zoning Code (TZC) Map 3. Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps City General Plan Environmental Justice Implementation Actions 4. City General Plan Environmental Justice (EJ) Implementation Actions Submitted By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Planning Manager Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager     City Council 10 – 23 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 15 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report May 7, 2024 TOPIC: Ten-Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 AGENDA TITLE Ten-Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, a 45-day Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 RECOMMENDED ACTION Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, the purpose of this staff report is to provide a written report no less than ten days prior to the expiration of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 describing the measures City staff has taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Ordinance. On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, which establishes a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in Specific Development No. 84, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (commonly referred to as the “Transit Zoning Code” or “TZC”) while City staff researches appropriate regulations and determines whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 shall have no further force and effect 45 days from the date of its adoption, unless, after a report on the first 45 days and a public hearing, the City Council members, again by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend the Ordinance Exhibit 3 - Ten-Day Written Report - May 7, 2024     City Council 10 – 24 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 2 for an initial extension period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days. Based on the adoption date of April 16, 2024, the Ordinance is scheduled to expire on June 1, 2024. As City staff begins to analyze and prepare an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC, the evaluation will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would address industrial land uses in the TZC. DISCUSSION Background On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent neighborhoods through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, proximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness. During the urgency interim moratorium period, the City will not issue permits that result in the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC. Measures Taken Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the 45-day moratorium, staff conducted an interagency meeting, which included representatives from multiple City departments. These departments include the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Moreover, engagement with additional agencies such as the Police Department, Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities are intertwined with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that the application of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 affects up to 130 industrial businesses in the TZC. Of these, over one-dozen have active applications for permits, the majority of which are to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties and address ongoing Code Enforcement Division notices of violation.     City Council 10 – 25 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 3 City staff continues to gather, review, and analyze information regarding affected industrial businesses within the TZC. Specific data and reporting pertains to applications submitted by industrial businesses for permits, entitlements, certificates of occupancy, business licenses, and other relevant records immediately prior to and following the adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance and currently being reviewed by City staff. Requests for information on calls for service and incident activities responded to by public safety departments of the Santa Ana Police Department and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) are being reviewed by City staff to understand and validate public safety concerns or impacts shared by neighbors in disadvantaged communities with actual calls and emergencies reported. In addition, City staff continues to monitor Code Enforcement Division activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance pertaining to these facilities. Code Enforcement staff will broaden data reports that show enforcement activity beyond the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance on April 16, 2024, 17 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby. Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies To broaden the analysis beyond the City's local land use impacts, City staff have initiated public records requests of violation records and violation status of outside regulatory agencies, and have contacted staff from external regulatory agencies such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), Santa Ana Regional Quality Water Control Board, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and others responsible for issuing supportive permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Specifically, these agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities, and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities and have received current data requests for sites located within SD No. 84. Data from external regulatory agencies would assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In     City Council 10 – 26 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 4 response to the City’s request, SCAQMD clarified the need to process the records request by larger geographic areas, not specifically matching the boundaries of the TZC. When reports become available to the City, additional time will be needed for City staff to carefully review and analyze other internal data to understand all activities (internal and external) and affected industrial businesses. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update and Neighborhood Engagement City staff continues to work with Project Consultant Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent and, to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required. MIG and City staff have already conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. City staff from the Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section of the Planning Division will continue to coordinate with City departments, external regulatory agencies, and staff from other federal and state agencies to identify additional resources available to enhance deeper awareness of pollution exposure in disadvantaged communities, long-term health effects, and immediate solutions. The NIES team has held meetings and discussions with staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and CalEPA Environmental Justice Team to identify opportunities for linking environmental justice (EJ) resources and support to the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In addition, the NIES team has been working with the residents selected to represent the City’s EJ Clusters to complete the formation of the EJ Action Committee, the community-led EJ advocacy group, to guide the prioritization and resource investments to implement the City’s General Plan EJ Policies and Implementation Actions. Next Steps Staff implements the 45-day moratorium established by Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 through ongoing interagency coordination. Moreover, staff will continue to analyze and prepare an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC, which will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether an extension of the 45-day moratorium is recommended. If an extension is recommended, it would be placed on the May 21, 2024 City Council agenda as a public hearing item, which is prior to the June 1 expiration date.     City Council 10 – 27 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 5 During the 45-day moratorium and any potential extension period, staff will evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would permanently address industrial land uses in the TZC. Meeting Date Display FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 2. April 16, 2024 City Council Staff Report Submitted By: Minh Thai, Planning and Building Agency Executive Director Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager     City Council 10 – 28 4/1/2025 UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-3064 AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) MONTHS AND FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has the police power pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, to make and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisd ictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urge ncy ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a Moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 ("SD-84") also known as the Transit Zoning Code ("TZC") by adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3063 to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods in the TZC (SD-84) through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, pro ximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness; and WHEREAS, the Moratorium will expire on June 1, 2024 unless extended; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council, after notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, to adopt an ordinance extending the Moratorium for 10 months and 15 days, upon approval by a fourth-fifths vote, and upon making the same findings required for the adoption of the initial forty-five (45) day Moratorium; and WHE REAS, Government Code Section 65858(d) requires the City Council, ten days prior to the expiration of the Moratorium or any extension thereof, to issue a written report descri bing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Moratorium; and Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 1 of 11 Exhibit 4 - Adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3064     City Council 10 – 29 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, on May 7, 2024, City staff prepared, and the City Co uncil issued and filed a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City's measures to alleviate co nditions that led to the adoption of the Moratorium; and WHEREAS, Santa Ana Charter Sections 415 and 417 expressly authorize the City Council to enact urgency ordinances, which take effect immediately upon introduction, for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858, authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance with a four-fifths vote, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, in unanimously adopting the Morat orium on April 16, 2024, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana established the following findings, all of which below remain true and applicable and necessary to support extending the Moratorium: •The TZC, located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010; and •Upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; and •The goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new and enhancement of existing communities through transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pede strian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and •Industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 2 of 11     City Council 10 – 30 4/1/2025 residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and •The TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were converted to the mixed-use zones allowed by the TZC; and •Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called "disadvantaged communities", in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and •The City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and •The Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana's General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and •As required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all of its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and •Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies). Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 3 of 11     City Council 10 – 31 4/1/2025 practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and •The industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and •The Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican­ American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 2oth century; and •The construction of Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in a number of families being displaced through the demol ition of single-fam ily homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and •In the 1970s a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demo lished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and •The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as "disadvantaged communities" by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and •Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local juris dictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, su ch as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and •The updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations-both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page4of11     City Council 10 – 32 4/1/2025 •There are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City's Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, pro perty and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active ope n industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC's existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and •In the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency -Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate mat ter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and •In the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency -Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 5 of 11     City Council 10 – 33 4/1/2025 impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmen tal effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and •There is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Raffer ty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very-low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and •There is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor's yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and •The City Council approved a contract with Moore, lacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City's Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and •MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and rev iews of existing zoning -related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 6 of 11     City Council 10 – 34 4/1/2025 com munities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area; and •The pol icies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and •Given these concerns, the City Council directed that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district; and •Based on the foregoing, the City Council found that continuing to issue permits, business licenses, or other applicabl e entitlements to in dividuals wishing to use their property located in the TZC for the purposes of industrial business use, prior to the City's completion of its study of the potential impact of such uses, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements in the TZC area is thus necessary; and •The City Council further found that if an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: o Adversely impacts surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; o Adversely impacts sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; o Conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; o Long-term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses; and o Risks to the public health, safety and welfare of the City; and •The City Council also determined that prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare required the immediate enactment of the urgency ordinance and that the absence of the urgency ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 7 of 11     City Council 10 – 35 4/1/2025 implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which may be adopted by the City; industrial business uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated updates and revisions to the Code. Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and imp lementat ion would create impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the City Council, in adopting the ordinance, found to be unacc eptable; and WHEREAS, Since the adoption of the Moratorium, City staff has begun to gather data and research the impact of these industrial uses in the TZC as set forth in the report issued by the City Council on May 7, 2204; and WHEREAS, there is a need to study further the issues associated with industrial uses in the TZC and the impact that these uses have on the adjacent residential neighborhoods and their residents; and WHEREAS, City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council each require a reasonable period of time to study the existing SD-84/TZC and to evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to extend the Moratorium for a period of ten (10)months and fifteen (15) days, or until the City Council adopts an ordinance addressing the issues raised, whichever occurs first; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 21, 2024, the City Council heard testimonial evidence and all other evidence submitted from members of the public that were present and fro m City staff. The City Council reviewed, analyzed, considered and studied all oral and written testimony and evide nce presented at the pub lic hearing, including staff reports and presentations of City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to public health, safety and welfare posed by industrial uses in SD-84, also known as, the TZC. If an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare due to adverse impacts on surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; adverse impacts on sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; and the effect of long term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses. Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 8 of 11     City Council 10 – 36 4/1/2025 Section 3. In accordance with Government Code Section 65858(d), on May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a written report describing the measures being taken to alleviate the conditions that lead to the adoption of the Moratorium and this extension thereof, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. Government Code Section 65858 author izes the City Council to adopt an interim Urgency Ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission of the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Section 5. Government Code Section 65858(a) provides that the City Council, after notice and a public hearing, may extend the interim Ordinance for 10 months and 15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any extension requires a four-fifths vote. Section 6. The City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858 and Santa Ana Charter Sections 415 and 417 hereby adopts this uncodified Urgency Ordinance extending the Moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC for a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, commencing June 1, 2024. The Moratorium will now expire on April 15, 2025, or until the City Council adopts an Ordinance addressing the issues related to the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of industrial uses within SD-84, also known as the TZC. For the purposes of this Urgency Ordinance, "industrial uses" includes those specified by Divisions 18 and 19 of Article Ill of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and by Section 41-2007 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and Table 2A in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84). Section 7. This Ordinance shall have no further force and effect after a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, commencing June 1, 2024; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this Ordinance for a period of one more year. Section 8. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be punished as provided Section 1-8 of Chapter 1 of the Code. Section 9. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to sections 15061 (b)(3) and 15061 (b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of uses in the zoning district. Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 9 of 11     City Council 10 – 37 4/1/2025 Section 10. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 11. This. Ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1 of this Ordinance. Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be publish�d in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED this 21 st day of May, 2024. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:��-K�Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: N OES: ABSTAI N : Councilmembers: Amezcua, Bacerra, Hernandez, Lo pez, Penaloza, Phan, Vazquez (7) Councilmembers: .:..;N'""'o-'-'n=e ..... (..;;;..0 L...) ______________ _ Councilmembers: .:..;N'""'o-'-'n =e ..... (..;;;..0)...__ _____________ _ N OT PRESE N T: Counc ilmembers: """'N ___ o ___ ne .......... (0__,)'---------------- Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 10 of 11     City Council 10 – 38 4/1/2025 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-3064 to be the original ordi nance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on May 21, 2024. Ordinance No. NS-3064 Page 11 of 11     City Council 10 – 39 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 28 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report May 21, 2024 TOPIC: Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 AGENDA TITLE Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (“SD-84”), Also Known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”) for Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a) Legal notice published in the Orange County Reporter on May 6, 2024. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance extending a moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within SD-84, by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), for an additional 10 months and 15 days. UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) MONTHS AND FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No Exhibit 5 - May 21, 2024 City Council Staff Report (without attachments)     City Council 10 – 40 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 2     City Council 10 – 41 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 Zoning District through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of this Moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84) through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, proximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness. During the moratorium, the City is not issuing permits that result in the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the Transit Zoning Code (TZC). Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the Moratorium shall have no further force and effect 45-days from the date of its adoption, which was April 16, 2024, unless extended. An extension requires the City Council issue a written report ten days prior to the expiration of the Moratorium, or extension thereof, describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Moratorium, provide notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, and hold a public hearing. Government Code Section 65858(a) allows an extension for 10 months and 15 days and a subsequent extension for one year. An extension also requires a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the Moratorium. City staff has determined that an extension of the Moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code is necessary to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to provide a complete analysis and thorough evaluation of the more than 130 industrial businesses within the TZC. An extension of the Moratorium would provide sufficient time to enable staff to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would address industrial land uses in the TZC.     City Council 10 – 42 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 4 DISCUSSION Background Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the Moratorium, staff conducted an interagency meeting, which included representatives from multiple City departments. These departments include the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Moreover, engagement with additional agencies such as the Police Department, Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities are intertwined with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that the application of the Moratorium affects more than 130 industrial businesses in the TZC. Of these, over one-dozen have active applications for permits, the majority of which are to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties and address ongoing Code Enforcement Division notices of violation. City staff continue to gather, review, and analyze information regarding affected industrial businesses within the TZC. Specific data and reporting pertains to applications submitted by industrial businesses for permits, entitlements, certificates of occupancy, business licenses, and other relevant records immediately prior to and following the adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance and currently under review by City staff. Requests for information on calls for service and incident activities responded to by public safety departments of the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) and the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) are being reviewed by City staff to understand and validate public safety concerns or impacts shared by neighbors in disadvantaged communities with actual calls and emergencies reported. Initial reports from the SAPD show calls for service in the TZC totaling 18,510 calls between March 2023 and April 2024. These calls for service included patrol checks, car stops, disturbances, alarm activation, trespassing, and many more types of calls for service. Of the 18,510 calls for service, 1,909 incidents reported were related to collisions, impounded vehicles, hit and run collisions, domestic violence, and Santa Ana municipal code violations. Similarly, data from OCFA shows 62 calls for service in 2022 and 66 calls for service for 2023 for a combined 128 calls for service for both 2022 and 2023 for advanced life support-related emergencies. Specifically, 29 of the service calls responded to by OCFA in 2022 were related to health stemming from respiratory concerns to chest pain and cardiac arrest, along with long-term diabetic issues and chest pains. In 2023, there was nearly a seven percent (7%) increase in the number of health-related calls OCFA responded to related to health issues.     City Council 10 – 43 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 5 In addition, City staff continue to monitor Code Enforcement Division activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance pertaining to these facilities. Code Enforcement staff will broaden data reports that show enforcement activity beyond the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the Moratorium, 17 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The amount of active open industrial cases, in close proximity to one another, during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance and harming the public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods. Since the adoption of the Moratorium, City staff have received multiple code enforcement complaints from community members about industrial businesses in the TZC area that were also reported previously before the adoption of the Moratorium. City staff have received repeated code enforcement and air emission complaints about facilities in the Logan neighborhood and are working with Code Enforcement Division and SCAQMD staff to obtain responses, investigations, or reports provided by the Code Enforcement Division and SCAQMD to the complaints reported. Recent code enforcement complaints on properties in the Logan neighborhood involve complaints for recurring unpermitted work and land use violations that involve large commercial vehicles blocking street access and impacting nearby residents. Code Enforcement Division follow-up has resulted in larger administrative citations, continued enforcement, and onsite meetings with business owners. Moreover, air emission complaints have been reported to SCAQMD. These complaints include one involving black smoke and another regarding unpermitted soil vapor extraction equipment onsite. Part of the jurisdictions that City staff are working with include SCAQMD staff to obtain updates regarding the status of these complaints. SCAQMD staff investigated one complaint that did not result in an enforcement action and is investigating the other complaint. SCAQMD staff has clarified that for air quality complaints they receive, their inspector is required to be physically present to observe the activity from the facility described in the complaint to determine if the complaint warrants further investigation or enforcement action in accordance with South Coast AQMD Rules 401 (Visible Emissions), 402 (Public Nuisance), and 403 (Fugitive Dust). Community members continue to share concerns with City and SCAQMD staff regarding the turnaround time for an SCAQMD inspector to be physically present at an SCAQMD-permitted facility to investigate an air quality complaint, especially if a complaint is reported after working hours or on weekends.     City Council 10 – 44 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 6 Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies To broaden the analysis beyond the City's local land use impacts, City staff have initiated public records requests from outside regulatory agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and others responsible for issuing supportive permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Such agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities, and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities and received current data requests for sites located within SD No. 84 that were initiated by City staff on April 25, 2024. Data from outside regulatory agencies will assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In response to the City’s request, SCAQMD clarified the need to process the records request by larger geographic areas, such as zip code area as an example, not specifically matching the boundaries of the TZC. The City has not received responses to its Public Records Act requests and once it does, additional time will be needed for City staff to carefully review and analyze the data in order to understand all activities (internal and external) and affected industrial businesses. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update and Neighborhood Engagement City staff continue to work with Project Consultant MIG to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent. In order to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code will likely be required. MIG and City staff have already conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts continue to indicate that there are irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area which are among the most pressing topics to be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. The Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section of the Planning Division continue to coordinate with City departments, outside regulatory agencies, and staff from other federal and state agencies to identify additional resources available to enhance deeper awareness of pollution exposure in disadvantaged communities, long-term health effects, and options for immediate     City Council 10 – 45 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 7 solutions. The NIES team has held meetings and discussions with staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and CalEPA Environmental Justice Team to identify opportunities for linking environmental justice (EJ) resources and support to the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. NIES staff also continue to coordinate with residents selected to represent the City’s EJ Clusters to complete the formation of the EJ Action Committee, the community-led EJ advocacy group. This group will help guide the prioritization and resource investments to implement the City’s General Plan EJ Policies and Implementation Actions. Next Steps During the Moratorium, staff will evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would permanently address industrial land uses in the TZC. Staff continues to receive, analyze, and prepare a thorough evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC. Staff has determined that an extension of the Moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), is recommended to provide the additional staff time and resources needed to implement a comprehensive evaluation of the industrial uses in the TZC utilizing the data reporting and tracking, regulatory research, enforcement reports, and department discussions to fully understand the effects of industrial uses in the TZC and to continue to address current and immediate threats to public health, safety, and welfare, due to growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts within the TZC. On May 7, 2024, a ten-day report was issued by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) and is attached and referenced as Exhibit A to the Ordinance attached to this staff report. The April 16, 2024 City Council Meeting staff report is included in this report as Exhibit 3, providing background on the issues and analysis on the original need for the Moratorium. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The extension of the Moratorium is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval,     City Council 10 – 46 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 8 commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of uses in Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Uncodified Urgency Ordinance Extending Moratorium for Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days 2. Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3036 adopted on April 16, 2024 3. April 16, 2024 City Council Staff Report and Exhibits 4. Public Notice Submitted By: Minh Thai, Planning and Building Agency Executive Director Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager     City Council 10 – 47 4/1/2025 Library www.santa-ana.org/library Item # 11 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: California State Library Funding AGENDA TITLE Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing $8,080 in California State Library Funding (General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $8,080 in California State Library California Library Services Act funds in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account and appropriate the same into the Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account, to apply toward Library e-resources. (Requires five affirmative votes) GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION As a full member of the Santiago Library System, which is a consortium of libraries in Orange County, the Santa Ana Public Library is eligible to receive funding from the California State Library, in accordance with the California Library Services Act. In January 2025, the Library was notified that it would receive $8,080.36 in funds to apply toward e-resources provided by Overdrive, Inc. (“Overdrive”). On October 17, 2023, the City Council approved an agreement with Overdrive, Inc. (“Overdrive”) to provide content hosting services and digital content such as e-books, e- audiobooks, e-magazines, and video streaming. The agreement ends June 30, 2026 with the option for up to two one-year renewals. In recent years, electronic content such as e-books, e-audiobooks, e-magazines, and streaming content have become very popular, and an essential part of the Library’s digital services platform. Library patrons can access Overdrive content through various methods that include the Santa Ana Public Library’s website, Libby app (by Overdrive), or on e-reader devices. Using Overdrive, patrons can browse the Library’s digital collection and check out materials with a valid Santa Ana Public Library card. From     City Council 11 – 1 4/1/2025 California State Library Funding April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 1 5 there, users can easily download books, magazines, videos, or audiobooks to computers or mobile devices. Titles will automatically expire at the end of the lending period. Downloadable titles offer library patrons of all ages a convenient way to access information and materials from home or anywhere there is an internet connection. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT The appropriation adjustment will recognize $8,080 in the Library Miscellaneous Income revenue account (01111002-57990), and appropriate the same to Library Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions expenditure account (01111190- 66511) as follows: Fiscal Year Accounting Unit- Account # Fund Description Accounting Unit, Account Description Amount FY 24-25 01111190 – 66511 General Fund Tech & Support Services, Computer Software Subscriptions $8,080 TOTAL $8,080 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Notification Letter Submitted By: Brian Sternberg, Executive Director of Library Services Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 11 – 2 4/1/2025     City Council 11 – 3 4/1/2025 Public Works Agency https://www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 12 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Dyer Road Improvements Project AGENDA TITLE Approve an Appropriation Adjustment Recognizing Measure M2 Grant Funding and Amend the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Capital Improvement Program for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25-6706) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 into the Measure M-Street Construction, Measure M2 Competitive revenue account (03217002-52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M-Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663-66220) for future year expenditures. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Capital Improvement Program to include Measure M2 grant funding in the amount of $2,365,200 for the Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project (Project No. 25-6706). GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for the administration and oversight of all Capital Improvement Projects in the City. On November 21, 2023, City Council authorized staff to submit the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) application for the Regional Capacity Program (Project O) for Arterial Capacity Enhancements (ACE) funding to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) (Exhibit 1). The Measure M2 Recommended Programming list includes the Dyer Road Improvements (Project) from the 55 Freeway to 700’ East of Pullman Street. This street segment is one of the most heavily trafficked in the City and has an Average Daily Traffic volume of over 50,000 vehicles. The City’s General Plan classifies Dyer Road from Grand Avenue to Redhill Avenue as a Primary Arterial (four lanes in each direction) with a Class II bike lane. The section of Dyer Road to the east of the Project is already wide enough to accommodate four lanes up to Red Hill Avenue. In conformance with the General Plan, the proposed Project would provide     City Council 12 – 1 4/1/2025 Dyer Road Improvements Project April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 8 8 7 an additional through lane in each direction to address the bottleneck that occurs near the 55 freeway’s off and on ramps and incorporate a class II bike lane, wider sidewalks, and landscaping (Exhibit 2). On May 13, 2024, the OCTA Board of Directors approved a grant of $2,365,200 to the City of Santa Ana for the engineering phase of the Project (Exhibit 3). The City is required to provide a 25% matching contribution of $788,400 for the Project for a total of $3,153,600. These funds will be used for the design phase and any remaining funds, pending approval from the granting agency, will be allocated to future right of way and construction phases. The City will seek additional Measure M2 grants in the coming years for the right of way and construction phases of the Project. The City’s 25% share will be sourced from current and future local funding, including but not limited to: Transportation Systems Improvement Area (TSIA) funds, Gas Tax funds, and Measure M2 Fairshare funds, and will be included in the FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget. Staff recommends adding the awarded grant funds to the Dyer Road Improvements (State Route 55 – 700’ East of Pullman Street) Project for the Design Engineering Phase and amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program to include the awarded grant funds (Exhibit 4). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the requested appropriation adjustment will recognize $2,365,200 Fiscal Year 2024-25 Measure M2 grant funds into the Public Works Measure M-Street Construction, M2 Competitive revenue account (No. 03217002-52332) and appropriate the same amount into the Public Works Measure M2 Competitive Street, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 03217663-66220). The City will recognize the required City local match through future Council action during the FY 2025-26 CIP budget programing cycle. The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available in current FY 2024-25 for design engineering and construction expenditures after the appropriation adjustment. Any unspent budget in FY 2024-25 will be included in future-year carryforwards for City Council consideration.     City Council 12 – 2 4/1/2025 Dyer Road Improvements Project April 1, 2025 Page 3 4 8 8 7 Fiscal Year Accounting Unit - Account No. (Project No.) Fund Description Accounting Unit - Account No. Description Amount APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 2024-25 03217663-66220 (25-6706) Measure M- Street Construction Measure M2 Competitive Street, Improvements Other Than Building $2,365,200 TOTAL $2,365,200 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution 2023-078 2. Location Map and Proposed Conditions 3. OCTA Board Approval 4. Fiscal Year 2024-25 CIP Sheet Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 12 – 3 4/1/2025 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TO THE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR FUNDING UNDER THE REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program targets over 2,000 signalized intersections across Orange County to maintain traffic signal synchronization, improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion across jurisdictions. B. The City of Santa Ana has been declared by the Orange County Transportation Authority to meet the eligibility requirements to receive revenues as park of Measure M2. C. The City of Santa Ana must include all projects funded by Net Revenues in the seven-year Capital Improvement Program as part of the Renewed Measure M Ordinance eligibility requirement. D. The City of Santa Ana authorizes a formal amendment to the seven-year Capital Improvement Program to add projects approved for funding upon approval from the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors, if necessary. E. The City of Santa Ana has currently adopted a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local agencies' efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local agencies' boundaries. F. The City of Santa Ana will provide matching funds for each project as required by the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs Procedures Manual. G. The City of Santa Ana will not use Renewed Measure M funds to supplant Developer Fees or other commitments. G. The City of Santa Ana desires to implement multi jurisdictional signal synchronization listed below. Resolution No. 2023-078 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 1     City Council 12 – 4 4/1/2025 Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby approves the formal submissions of the projects described below to the Orange County Transportation Authority for funding under the OCTA's Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and requests that the OCTA allocate funds in the amounts specified in the City's submissions. Said funds shall be matched by funds from Santa Ana as required and shall be used as supplemental funding to aid the City in signal synchronization along the following street(s): PROJECT PROGRAM FY Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue (KGG) Traffic RTSSP 24125 Signal Synchronization Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana appoints the City Manager, or his or her designee, as agent for the City of Santa Ana to conduct all negotiations, and execute and submit all documents, including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for allocation of the requested funds to Santa Ana. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this 21 "1 day of November, 2023. le ie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: Jonathan T. Martinez 4#1 Assistant City Attorney Resolution No. 2023-078 Page 2 of 3    City Council 12 – 5 4/1/2025 AYES: Councilmembers Amezcua, Bacerra, Hernandez, Lopez, Penaloza, Phan, Vazquez (7) NOES: Councilmembers None (0)_.__. ABSTAIN: Councilmembers None (0) NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers None_(0) CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, JENNIFER L. HALL, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2023-078 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 21. 2023. Date: (L) L-:' ennifer . al le rk City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2023-078 Page 3of3    City Council 12 – 6 4/1/2025 PWA SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT 2 55 FREEWAY - 700' E/O PULLMAN PROJECT DYER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 25-6705 MARCH 18, 2025 AGENDA DATE: CITY COUNCIL D Y ER R D DYER RD PULLMAN ST 55 FREEEWA Y RED HILL AVE PROJECT LOCATION (NOT TO SCALE)EXHIBIT 2 700' APRIL 1, 2025     City Council 12 – 7 4/1/2025 APRIL 1, 2025     City Council 12 – 8 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL May 13, 2024 To:Members of the Board of Directors Andrea West, Clerk of the BoardFrom: Subject:Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs – 2024 Call for Projects Programming Recommendations Regional Transportation Planning Committee Meeting of May 6, 2024 Present: Absent: Directors Do, Dumitru, Federico, Foley, Harper, and Stephens Khan Committee Vote This item was passed by the Members present. Committee Recommendations A. B. Approve the award of $18.72 million in 2024 Regional Capacity Program (Project O) funds to six local jurisdiction projects. Approve the award of $12.89 million in 2024 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P) funds to five local jurisdiction projects. Orange County Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)     City Council 12 – 9 4/1/2025 May 6, 2024 To:Regional Transportation Planning Committee Darrell E. Johnson, Chief Executive OfficerFrom: Subject:Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs – 2024 Call for Projects Programming Recommendations Overview The Orange County Transportation Authority issued the 2024 Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs Regional Capacity Program and Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program call for projects in August 2023. Project Applications were due in October 2023. A list of projects recommended for funding is presented for Board of Directors’ review and approval. Recommendations A. B. Approve the award of $18.72 million in 2024 Regional Capacity Program (Project O) funds to six local jurisdiction projects. Approve the award of $12.89 million in 2024 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P) funds to five local jurisdiction projects. Background The Regional Capacity Program (RCP), Project O, is the Measure M2 (M2) competitive funding program through which the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) supports street and road improvement projects. The Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP), Project P, is the M2 competitive program that provides funding for regional signal synchronization projects. Orange County Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)     City Council 12 – 10 4/1/2025 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs –Page 2 2024 Call for Projects Programming Recommendations Both programs are included in the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs (CTFP) which include all of the competitive M2 programs that provide grants to local agencies for transit, streets and roads, and environmental cleanup. These programs are subject to an annual call for projects (call) which is guided by the Board of Directors (Board)-approved CTFP guidelines. The CTFP guidelines are updated before each call and include scoring criteria that are developed in collaboration with the OCTA Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which is comprised of representatives from the 35 local jurisdictions. The guidelines and the call are ultimately approved for release by the Board. The CTFP guidelines for the 2024 call were approved by the Board on August 14, 2023. At that meeting, the Board also authorized the issuance of the current call. The available funding, based on the cash flow that was prepared at that time, was reported as approximately $45 million in competitive M2 funds to support regional roadway and signal synchronization projects throughout Orange County. Discussion RCP OCTA received six applications requesting a total of $21.41 million in funding as further detailed in Attachment A. The applications were reviewed for eligibility, consistency, adherence to the guidelines, and overall M2 program objectives aimed at completing a balanced regional network. Applications were evaluated and ranked based on the scoring criteria identified in the guidelines. During the review process, staff worked with local jurisdictions to address technical issues such as application scoring corrections, scope of work clarifications, and refinement of final project funding requests. Based upon these reviews and project consistency with the guidelines, staff recommends funding for all six projects, totaling $18.72 million (with inflationary adjustments as appropriate). The recommended programming amount is lower than the originally requested amount, which is the result of OCTA’s detailed application review. The revised recommended grant amount reflects only the project scope components and amounts that are eligible per CTFP guidelines. Attachment B provides more detail on the programming recommendations. The recommended M2 RCP funding will support six projects in the cities of Dana Point, Garden Grove, Irvine, Laguna Niguel, Santa Ana, and Yorba Linda. Orange County Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)     City Council 12 – 11 4/1/2025 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs –Page 3 2024 Call for Projects Programming Recommendations Of the six recommended projects, three will provide arterial improvement benefits with grants for the engineering, right-of-way (ROW), and/or construction phases, and three will provide intersection capacity enhancements with ROW and construction phase grants. Implementation of these projects in aggregate is anticipated to produce notable congestion relief in Orange County, while enhancing the arterial system overall. RTSSP OCTA received six applications requesting a total of $13.91 million in RTSSP funding. These applications were also reviewed for eligibility, consistency, and adherence to guidelines and overall program objectives. During the review process, one project application was withdrawn by the local jurisdiction, reducing the overall requested funding of this call to $13.53 million. Attachment A has more detail on the submitted projects. Staff worked with the sponsoring local jurisdictions to address technical issues of final project funding requests. Staff recommends award of $12.89 million to fund five RTSSP projects. The revised recommended grant amount is a result of application review related to construction cost refinements and scope of work clarifications. All five of the recommended projects are anticipated to be implemented by the local jurisdictions in fiscal year 2024-25. Additional details on the RTSSP-recommended projects are provided in Attachment C. The table below provides an overall summary of the funding recommendations: 2024 CTFP Call Summary ($ in millions) RCP 6 RTSSP 5 Total 11Number of Applications Recommended for Approval Amount Recommended for Approval (escalated)$18.72 $12.89 $31.61 These recommendations are consistent with the 2024 guidelines approved by the Board. As such, staff recommends programming $31.61 million for 11 projects under the RCP and RTSSP. These awards bring the total amount of M2 grants by OCTA to local agencies to more than $556 million since 2011 in support of the development of a safe, efficient, and modern roadway system. A map displaying the 2024 RCP and RTSSP recommended project awards is provided in Attachment D.     City Council 12 – 12 4/1/2025 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs –Page 4 2024 Call for Projects Programming Recommendations The recommendations were presented to both the OCTA Technical Steering Committee (TSC) and TAC in March 2024, and both committees voted to support staff’s recommendations. The TSC and TAC asked questions related to the difference between the funding target and the awards. The committees also discussed working with staff to review the guidelines as part of the next funding cycle in response to inflationary cost pressures, maintaining an aging roadway network, and consideration for multimodal solutions. The funding target for each year’s RCP and RTSSP call is established based on a cash flow estimate that considers M2 revenues and existing awards. It also assumes the continuation of annual calls into the future at a similar annual target. Any funds not awarded simply stay in the cash flow in the same program for future years. This is relevant because there appears to be a significant funding need, which may manifest within the next two to five years based on capital improvement plans submitted by the local jurisdictions. The M2 Ordinance requires M2 funds dedicated to specific projects and programs, such as the RCP and RTSSP, to be used for its voter-approved intent. The CTFP guidelines fulfill this commitment to the taxpayers. Staff will work to provide the TAC with more details on near-term anticipated projects, as well as a better understanding of the M2 voter commitments and opportunities to address some of the current issues through other means. Next Steps With Board approval of these recommendations, staff will initiate the execution of letter agreements between OCTA and the appropriate local jurisdictions. As these projects advance, staff will continue to monitor their status and project delivery through the semi-annual review process. Summary Programming recommendations that will award $31.61 million to 11 projects in M2 2024 RCP and RTSSP funds are presented for Board approval.     City Council 12 – 13 4/1/2025 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs –Page 5 2024 Call for Projects Programming Recommendations Attachments A. B. 2024 Measure M2 Call for Projects – Applications Received 2024 M2 Regional Capacity Program (Project O) Call for Projects – Programming Recommendations C. D. 2024 M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P) Call for Projects – Programming Recommendations 2024 Recommended Project O & P Awards Map Prepared by:Approved by: Adrian Salazar Kia Mortazavi Senior Transportation Funding Analyst (714) 560-5363 Executive Director, Planning (714) 560-5741     City Council 12 – 14 4/1/2025 ATTACHMENT A 2024 Measure M2 Call for Projects – Applications Received Regional Capacity Program (Project O) Applications Total M2 RequestAgency Dana Point Project Fund Phase Match Rate Match Total Cost 687,000Stonehill Drive Improvement Project ACE ENG 25%$ $ $ 515,250 $ $ $ $ $ 171,750 $ $ $ $ $ Garden Grove Irvine Garden Grove Boulevard/Harbor Boulevard Intersection Improvement Jeffery Road and Barranca Parkway Intersection Improvements Crown Valley Parkway Westbound Improvement Project ICE ICE CON ROW, CON ROW, CON ENG 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 4,274,963 1,104,221 1,424,987 368,074 5,699,950 1,472,295 14,902,905 3,153,600 Laguna Niguel Santa Ana Yorba Linda ACE ACE ICE $ 11,177,179 3,725,726 788,400Dyer Road Improvements (SR-55 to 700' E/O Pullman Street) Yorba Linda Boulevard/Savi Ranch Parkway Improvements $ $ 2,365,200 1,971,000ROW $657,000 $2,628,000 REQUESTED TOTALS $ 21,407,813 $7,135,937 $28,543,750 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P) Applications Total M2 RequestAgencyProject1FundSignalsMatch Rate Match Total Cost Anaheim Ball Road-Taft Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project2 RTSSP 37 20%$ $ $ 1,756,774 1,498,451 2,974,355 $ $ $ $ 439,194 $ $ $ $ 2,195,968 Laguna Hills Paseo De Valencia - Moulton Parkway Confluence Bypass Corridor Alicia Parkway RTSSP Project RTSSP RTSSP 20 40 20% 20% 374,613 743,589 663,914 1,873,064 3,717,944 3,319,570 Laguna Niguel Rancho Santa Margarita Antonio Parkway - Avenida De Las Banderas - Avenida Empresa RTSSP Project Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue RTSSP Corridor RTSSP RTSSP 38 62 20% 20% $ $ 2,655,656 4,647,224Santa Ana $1,161,806 $5,809,030 REQUESTED TOTALS $ 13,532,460 $3,383,116 $16,915,576 Acronyms: E/O - East of ACE - Arterial Capacity Enhancements CON - Construction ENG - Engineering ICE - Intersection Capacity Enhancements M2 - Measure M2 OCTA - Orange County Transportation Authority ROW - Right-of-Way RTSSP - Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program SR-55 - State Route 55 1. The City of San Clemente submitted but then withdrew a Project P application totaling $473k for timing work on El Camino Real that overlapped with OCTA's Countywide Baseline Project.     City Council 12 – 15 4/1/2025 ATTACHMENT B 2024 M2 Regional Capacity Program (Project O) Call for Projects - Programming Recommendations Fiscal Year M2 Funding Engineering M2 Funding Right-of-Way M2 Funding Construction* Total M2 Funding Estimated Match Total Programming Match RateAgencyProjectFundPhase Dana Point 24/25 Stonehill Drive Improvement Project1 ACE ENG $330,000 $ $ $ $ $ 330,000 $ $ $ $ $ 110,000 $440,000 6,087,856 1,353,485 12,603,371 3,153,600 25% Garden Grove Boulevard/Harbor Boulevard Intersection Improvement2Garden Grove Irvine 25/26 25/26 ICE ICE CON $ $ $ $ 3,957,107 926,065 3,957,107 1,015,113 9,452,528 2,365,200 2,130,750 338,372 $ $ $ $ 35% 25% 25% 25% 25% Jeffery Road and Barranca Parkway Intersection Improvements3 ROW, CON $ $ 89,049 24/25, Crown Valley Parkway Westbound 25/26 Improvement Project4 ROW, CONLaguna Niguel Santa Ana Yorba Linda ACE ACE ICE 1,781,514 7,671,014 2,365,200 3,150,842 788,400Dyer Road Improvements (SR-55 to 700' E/O Pullman Street)24/25 24/25 ENG Yorba Linda Boulevard/Savi Ranch Parkway Improvements5 ROW $1,601,700 $1,601,700 $533,900 $2,135,600 PROGRAMMING TOTALS $330,000 $3,472,263 $14,919,385 $18,721,648 $7,052,264 $25,773,912 *Includes escalation of 2.6% for all right-of-way and construction projects programmed for fiscal year 2025/26. Acronyms: ACE - Arterial Capacity Enhancements ICE - Intersection Capacity Enhancements CON - Construction M2 - Measure M2 CTFP - Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs ROW - Right-of-Way SR-55 - State Route 55 E/O - East of MPAH - Master Plan of Arterial Highways OCTA - Orange County Transportation AuthorityENG - Engineering 1. Applicant requested additional funding but award is reduced to reflect eligibility of items within project scope. Total project cost is $687k. The OCTA grant plus local match is listed as $440K; an additional $247k will be needed from local sources. 2. Applicant requested additional funding but award is reduced to reflect eligibility of items within project scope and correct match reduction. Total project cost is $6.48 million. The OCTA grant plus local match is listed as $6.08 million; an additional $548k is to come from local sources. 3. Applicant requested additional funding but award is reduced to reflect eligibility of items within project scope. Total project cost is $1.47 million. The OCTA grant plus local match is $1.35 million; an additional $158K is to come from local sources. 4. Applicant requested additional funding but award is reduced to reflect eligibilty of items within project scope. The recommended grant includes a minor exception to the CTFP guidelines to allow work within 600 feet from intersection for the benefit of the MPAH to reach a logical terminus on Forbes Road, south of the intersection. Total project cost is $14.5 million. The OCTA grant plus local match is $12.6 million; an additional $2.21 million is to come from local sources. 5. Applicant requested additional funding but award is reduced to reflect eligibility of items within project scope. The recommended grant includes a minor exception to the CTFP guidelines to allow work within a 600 feet from intersection for the benefit of the MPAH to reach a logical terminus on Mirage Street. Total project cost is $2.63 million. The OCTA grant plus local match is $2.14 million; an additional $492k is to come from local sources.     City Council 12 – 16 4/1/2025 ATTACHMENT C 2024 M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P) Call for Projects - Programming Recommendations M2 Funding Primary Implementation M2 Funding Operations & Maintenance Fiscal Year Total M2 Funding Total ProgrammingAgencyProject1Match 342,650 Match Rate Anaheim 24/25 Ball Road-Taft Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project2 $1,264,038 1,274,666 2,765,019 2,466,004 $ $ $ $ 106,560 73,440 $ $ $ $ 1,370,598 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,713,248 1,685,132 3,738,274 3,267,005 20% Laguna Hills 24/25 Paseo De Valencia - Moulton Parkway Confluence Bypass Corridor3,4 $ $ $ 1,348,106 2,990,619 2,613,604 337,026 747,655 653,401 20% 20% 20% 20% Laguna Niguel Rancho Santa Margarita Santa Ana 24/25 Alicia Parkway RTSSP Project5 225,600 147,600Antonio Parkway - Avenida De Las Banderas - Avenida Empresa24/25 RTSSP Project6 24/25 Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue RTSSP Corridor7 $ $ 4,425,166 $ $ 143,360 696,560 $ $ 4,568,526 $ $ 1,142,132 3,222,864 $ $ 5,710,658 PROGRAMMING TOTALS 12,194,893 12,891,453 16,114,317 Acronyms: M2 - Measure M2 RTSSP - Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program 1. The City of San Clemente submitted but then withdrew a Project P application totaling $473k for timing work on El Camino Real that overlapped with OCTA's Countywide Baseline Project. 2. Project partners include Caltrans and City of Orange. 3. Project partner includes City of Laguna Woods. 4. Coordination with Alicia Parkway RTSSP project to achieve minimum signal count. 5. Project partners include Cities of Aliso Viejo, Caltrans, Laguna Hills, and Mission Viejo. 6. Project partners include Caltrans and County of Orange. 7. Project partners include Cities of Anaheim, Brea, Caltrans, Placentia, and Orange.     City Council 12 – 17 4/1/2025 2R024eocm m enPAdOPe&wdcrt oaj r ds ATTACHMENT D LA HABRA BREALOS SAN ANG ELES BERNARDNIO PLACENTIAFULLERTON YORBA LINDA Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard/Savi Ranch Parkway Improvements BUENA PARK RVEI RDSIE Santa Ana ANAHEIM Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue RTSSP Corridor VILLA PARK STANTON Anaheim ORANGEBall Road-Taft Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project GARDEN GROVE ! WESTMINSTER UNINCORPORATEDGarden Grove Garden Grove Boulevard/Harbor Boulevard Intersection Improvement SANTA ANA TUSTIN ORANGE CO UNTYFOUNTAIN VALLEY Santa Ana Dyer RoadHUNTINGTONImprovementsBEACH Rancho Santa MargaritaIRVINEAntonio Parkway- Avenida De Las Banderas- Avenida Empresa Irvine!Jeffrey Road and Barranca Parkway Intersection ImprovementsCOSTA MESA RTSSP Project LAKE FORESTLaguna Hills Paseo de Valencia- Moulton Parkway Confluence Bypass Corridor RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA MISSION VIEJONEWPORT BEACH LAGUNA WOODS Laguna Niguel Alicia Parkway RTSSP ProjectLAGUNA HILLSALISO VIEJO Laguna Niguel Crown Valley Parkway Westbound Improvement Project LAGUNA BEACH !POeLrct ocaojonst i LAGUNA NIGUEL PCPerct orodj or is SAN JUAN SouOr Cce: TA CAPISTRANO SgyncSahRi czaTl rPSoTnrRi oi St no–agi ef Prgialf m Z 0 2 4 DANA POINT Dana Point Stonehill Drive Improvement Project SAN CLEMENTE es Ml i 2024/4/ RTSSP - Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program     City Council 12 – 18 4/1/2025 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs 2024 Call for Projects Programming Recommendations     City Council 12 – 19 4/1/2025 Background Program Project O Project P Goals and Objective Project O provides funding to complete the MPAH. In addition, the program provides for intersection improvements and other projects to help improve street operations and reduce congestion. Project P targets to coordinate over 2,000 signalized intersections in the County across jurisdictional boundaries including cities, County of Orange, and Caltrans. % of M2 Allocation 10% of M2 Net Revenues 4% of M2 Net Revenues Call Amount (on average) Approximately $30 million awarded per call. Approximately $10.5 million awarded per call. Impact Through 13 calls, 180 projects awarded, more than $387 million (includes leveraged external funds). Through 13 calls, 112 projects awarded, more than $137 million (includes leveraged external funds). Call – Call for projects Caltrans – California Department of Transportation MPAH - Master Plan of Arterial Highways M2 – Measure M2 2     City Council 12 – 20 4/1/2025 Regional Capacity Program Project O ExamplesCloses gaps in the local road network Improves intersections to enhance street operations Provides better interfaces with the highway system Bastanchury Road Improvements Project O funds awarded to date: $363.4 million Newport Boulevard Improvements City of Brookhurst Street Improvements Grand Avenue Improvements City of Santa Ana City of Yorba LindaCity of Anaheim Newport Beach 3     City Council 12 – 21 4/1/2025 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project P ExamplesReduces travel times, stops, and delays Invests in future- proofing the system Improves traffic flow and makes the system more efficient Project P funds awarded to date: $129.4 million Irvine Center Drive / Edinger Avenue City of Irvine Marguerite Parkway City of Edinger Avenue City of Fountain Valley Mission Viejo 4     City Council 12 – 22 4/1/2025 Staff Recommendations • Approve the 2024 RCP to fund six projects, totaling $18.72 million • Approve the 2024 RTSSP to fund five projects, totaling $12.89 million RCP - Regional Capacity Program RTSSP - Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program 5     City Council 12 – 23 4/1/2025 Project O Recommendations Approve six projects totaling $18.72 million in RCP funds • $12.15 million for roadway improvements • $6.57 million for intersection enhancements 6     City Council 12 – 24 4/1/2025 Project P Recommendations Approve five projects totaling $12.89 million in RTSSP funds ▪ Improvements to194 signals along 50 miles of streets ▪ Coordination of traffic flow across 12 local jurisdictions 7     City Council 12 – 25 4/1/2025 2024 Call Timeline and Milestones • March 27, 2024 – Technical Advisory Committee • May 6, 2024 – Regional Transportation Planning Committee • May 13, 2024 – OCTA Board Final Approval • July 1, 2024 – Programming of 2024 Project O & Project P Grants (subject to Board Approval) Board – Board of Directors OCTA – Orange County Transportation Authority 8     City Council 12 – 26 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 4 CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 24/25CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET PROJECT TITLE:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:PROJECT NEED: Dyer Road Improvements (55 Freeway - 700' E/O Pullman) Project The project will consist of pavement improvements, curb and gutter, driveways, manholes adjustments, wheel chair ramps, sidewalk, additional through lanes eastbound and westbound, bike lanes with a bike lane buffer, and landscaping Additional through lanes are needed in each direction to address bottleneck caused by the freeway. PROJECT CATEGORY: Street Improvements Street/Bridge Improvements & Widening LOCATION MAP PROJECT COSTS FY 24/25 2,365,200 2,365,200 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 Engineering ------ TOTAL ------ SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 25/26 2,365,200 2,365,200 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 MEASURE M2 COMPETITIVE ------ TOTAL ------ AGENCY:DIVISION:CONTACT:DATE: Public Works CIP Engineering Gilbert Castillo, Senior Engineer 01-Apr-25     City Council 12 – 27 4/1/2025 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 13 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Purchase of a Ford E-450 with CCTV Upfit AGENDA TITLE Purchase Order Contract to Haaker Equipment Company for One 2024 Ford E-450 with CCTV Upfit (Specification No. 25-022) (Non-General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve a purchase order to Haaker Equipment for one, new/unused 2024 Ford E-450 with CCTV Upfit in an amount of $446,013 plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $461,013. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency’s (PWA) Parks, Fleet, and Facilities Division is responsible for the acquisition, maintenance, repair, and replacement of vehicles, trucks, and maintenance equipment. The Fleet Services works collaboratively with various City departments to evaluate vehicle and equipment needs and facilitates their procurement. PWA’s Water Resources Division (Water Resources) oversees and maintains the City of Santa Ana’s water and sanitary sewer systems. Water Resources is requesting a new Ford E-450 (Exhibit 1) with closed-circuit television (CCTV) upfit to support the Sewer System Maintenance section in inspecting the City’s sewer mains and laterals. Currently, the City utilizes contractors to conduct routine cleaning and CCTV inspection of sewer mains and laterals, and provides the corresponding data to inform maintenance and repair operations. While the requested equipment will primarily support the lateral repair program, which repairs damaged laterals to prevent backups and sewage spills, it will also enable staff to conduct additional CCTV inspections in- house for spot checks and address sewer-related concerns more efficiently. This new CCTV truck will be added to the City’s fleet and will not replace any older equipment. Santa Ana City Ordinance No. NS-3041 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. Sourcewell, a cooperative government purchasing agency, awarded a contract to Envirosight LLC (Contract No. 120721-EVS) as a result of open, competitive bidding on behalf of its     City Council 13 – 1 4/1/2025 Purchase of a Ford E-450 with CCTV Upfit April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 1 3 members, which includes government agencies. Haaker Equipment Company is the sole source for all new video pipeline inspection equipment, accessories, and software provided by Envirosight, LLC. Staff researched available procurement options and product offerings in the market and determined that Haaker Equipment Company meets the City’s specifications. By leveraging the procurement power through cooperative purchasing, the City of Santa Ana is able to obtain nationally vetted, high quality products at competitive volume pricing, and is in accordance with the City’s existing Purchasing guidelines. Staff recommends approving a purchase order to Haaker Equipment Company for one new/unused 2024 Ford E-450 with CCTV Upfit (Exhibit 2). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are budgeted and available in the following accounts for Fiscal Year 2024-25: Fiscal Year Accounting Unit-Account # Fund Description Accounting Unit, Account Description Amount 2024-25 05617640-66400 Sanitary Sewer Service Equipment Replacement, Machinery & Equipment $461,013 TOTAL $461,013 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Sample Picture of Ford E-450 with CCTV Upfit 2. Haaker Equipment Company Quote No. September 24, 2024 Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 13 – 2 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 1     City Council 13 – 3 4/1/2025 2070 North White Avenue, La Verne, California 91750 (909) 598-2706 ~ FAX (909) 598-1427 ~ haaker.com In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit the following proposal for your consideration and approval based on the SOURCEWELL Cooperative Purchasing Agreement – Contract #120721-EVS September 24, 2024 City of Santa Ana 215 S. Center St Santa Ana, CA 92703 C/O Jose Medina (PWA) and Alex Reyes Sourcewell PROPOSAL – RovverX CCTV System, Build Out, and Ford E-450 with 14-foot box Dear Jose and Alex: Thank you for your interest in the RovverX SAT 2.0 and mainline inspection system with capabilities to inspect from 6” to 36” pipes. Exhibit 2     City Council 13 – 4 4/1/2025 I am pleased to offer the system as follows. Price includes equipment, build out, inverter/battery bank, solar panel, and Ford E-450 14-foot box gas chassis. E-RX-SYS-SAT-Combo-HDL: HD Includes DCX5000 including CCUI, large frame and cable for CCUI to Mainline Reel, RXSAT140 II QCD Crawler with 8 small rubber wheels installed, standard accessories and transport case, RAXSAT 300 Cable Reel with 300M Orange Cable and 45M of red push cable and cable for SAT Reel to Mainline Reel, RAX300 Cable Reel with 300M Cable installed, PTP50 Camera, AC40 Camera, RCX90 Camera, RX130L Crawler with 6 small rubber wheels installed and integrated lift. 8 medium rubber wheels, 4 large rubber wheels, and 2 climber wheels. Double Cable Roller for SAT, Guide pipe adapter DN75 with set of 4 guide pipes DN200-DN800. 2 Gigaware Cables for DCX to Computer, Pressure Kit, Wincan VX/RX License. $243,425.00 E-559-3900-00: HD RAL200 LED Auxiliary Light with Backeye Camera for RVX $5,628.00 E-080-0709-00: Small Aggressive Wheel for QC RX130 Crawler E-080-0711-00: 8” Medium Aggressive wheels (set of 4) with Quick Change Technology-PVC Pipe $ 2,250.00 $ 3,008.00 E-080-0704-02: XL Rubber Wheels for use in 15” and larger diameter pipes-Quick Change Technology $2,855.00 Miscellaneous Hardware: Top Manhole roller, invert roller, tool kit, clean up kit $3,785.00 Operator Studio: Solid Bulkhead wall with sliding window and, Formica desk with outlets above and below, storage cabinet, bench seat with storage, overhead recessed LED lighting, 19” Tru-Vu monitor, operator chair, carpeted walls and ceiling, safety light switches in truck cab, rack cabinet (for computer/ DVD-RW) rack mount UPS device, wall file, black-treaded rubber floor, battery operated carbon monoxide detector, and video distribution booster. Carbon Monoxide Detector Included Equipment Bay Stainless steel work surface, built-in heavy-duty storage/tool chest, slide-out crawler tray under reel, rear facing 19” Tru-Vu monitor, full height storage cabinet behind crawler drawer, wash- down system (on-demand pump, lighted switch, 10 gallon tank with exterior fill, 25’ retractable hose reel), sink for wash-down, Ceiling LED light, gray FRP over plywood on walls and ceiling, aluminum storage shelf and caddy, wheel and drawer, rubber glove dispenser. 12 volt crane, and Tool package. Carbon Monoxide Detector Included Miscellaneous: hand sanitizer, waterless soap, paper towels, rubber gloves, first aid kit, fire extinguisher, rain-x, simple green, dry-erase board, safety package, traffic cones Included Exterior: rear barn doors with latches/locks, side door with step well, custom Envirosight mud flaps, tie- off clamp on rear bumper. Door latches to secure them in place when open Included Power Package: 3.0KW Xantrex shore power cord with 120V wall adapter • breaker box • auto-transfer switch • 12V fuse block • battery tender • kill Switch • Xantrex control panel. Includes bank of batteries to run entire system without the need to run chassis. Includes flexible solar panel Included     City Council 13 – 5 4/1/2025 43" 4-Up Monitor $4,100.00 Roof Mounted Floods Included 4 Corner Mounted LED Strobes and rear mounted LED arrow board $1,295.00 Back Up Alarm. Included Back Up Camera. Included Total for Build Out as Described Above $56,945.00 WinCan VX Advanced License: WinCan VX Advanced License includes: Section/Lateral/Manhole, Basic Reporting, Report Generator, Data Viewer, All languages & Standards, Map Viewer, PhotoAssistant, Drawing function, Meta DB, Data Transfer Tool, SQL database option, Multiple Inspection, Grading, MPEG 1/2/4 Recording, Software Encoding and Text Generator. NASSCO Validator, Inclination, Local deformation & Crack width with laser, HD Video Capture. $11,058.00 Rack Mount Computer: $3,370.00 H-AVERCARD Aver Media Card PCI $535.00 2024 Ford E-450 with 14-foot box, 158” WB, and 7.3L V* Gas Engine $69,995.00 Total for RovverX CCTV Equipment accessories, chassis and build out…………….………....$ 408,249.00 Sales Tax ……. @ 9.25% (Santa Ana, CA) ……………………………………………………………………..$ 37,763.03 Total for RovverX SYSTEM WITH ALL ENHANCEMENTS AS DETAILED ABOVE:………………$446,012.03 The price quoted includes all inbound shipping charges to CA and (2) days of training. Haaker Equipment Company, based out of La Verne CA, is the authorized dealer and service center for ALL Envirosight technology and equipment. We can also service all RovverX equipment out of our Santee, CA branch. We have trained certified technicians and all the inventory needed to perform all repairs in a timely manner. If we cannot repair any given component in less than 72 hours, a loaner will be provided at no charge to the City of Santa Ana. The warranty on this product is 1 Year Against Manufacturers’ Defect or Faulty Workmanship. Thank you again for the opportunity and I will be looking forward to working for you on the purchase of this equipment and I will also be looking forward to your favorable consideration. Respectfully Yours Chuy Vallejo     City Council 13 – 6 4/1/2025 Chuy Vallejo     City Council 13 – 7 4/1/2025 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 14 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Purchase One 2025 Ford F-600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck AGENDA TITLE Purchase Order Contract to PB Loader Corporation for One 2025 Ford F-600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Specification No. 25-031) (Non-General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one, new/unused 2025 Ford F- 600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck, in an amount of $245,023, plus a contingency amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $260,023. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency’s (PWA) Parks, Fleet, and Facilities Division is responsible for the acquisition, maintenance, repair, and replacement of vehicles, trucks, and maintenance equipment. The Fleet Services team maintains an equipment replacement schedule and works with departments to routinely replace vehicles that have surpassed their useful life cycle. The PWA Water Resources Division (Water Resources) manages and maintains the operations of Santa Ana’s water and sanitary sewer systems. Water Resources currently utilizes a 2014 F-550 for daily operations by the Sewer System Maintenance team. The existing vehicle, the 2014 F-550, was evaluated in accordance with the City’s Equipment Replacement Policy (Exhibit 1), which defines the review process when an equipment is no longer economically operated and maintained. Based on the equipment lifecycle guidelines, the existing vehicle has reached its useful lifecycle of 10 years. Water Resources is requesting to replace the vehicle with a new 2025 Ford F-600 which includes additional on-board equipment, including a larger-capacity air compressor for powering pneumatic tools used at jobsites such as jackhammers, tampers, and grinders, as well as an on-board electrical generator to power worksite lighting and charge batteries for power tools. These upgrades will reduce the need for a secondary vehicle and/or crew at a jobsite and is a more efficient method of maintaining the high- quality sewer services provided to Santa Ana residents and businesses.     City Council 14 – 1 4/1/2025 Purchase of a Ford F-600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 1 4 Santa Ana City Ordinance No. NS-3041 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. Sourcewell, a cooperative government purchasing agency, awarded a contract to PB Loader Corporation (Contract No. 080521-PBL) as a result of open, competitive bidding on behalf of its members, which includes government agencies. Staff researched available procurement options and product offerings in the market and determined that PB Loader Corporaton meets the City’s vehicle specifications (Exhibit 2). By leveraging the procurement power through cooperative purchasing, the City of Santa Ana is able to obtain nationally vetted, high quality products at competitive volume pricing, and is in accordance with the City’s existing Purchasing guidelines. Staff recommends approving a purchase order to PB Loader Corporation for one new/unused 2025 Ford F-600 Regular Cab Utility Service Body Truck (Exhibit 3). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are budgeted and available in the following accounts for Fiscal Year 2024-25: Fiscal Year Accounting Unit-Account # Fund Description Accounting Unit, Account Description Amount 2024-25 07017100-66400 Equipment Replacement Equipment Replacement, Machinery & Equipment 260,023 TOTAL $260,023 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Equipment Replacement Policy 2. PB Loader Corporation Quote No.12556R 3. Sample Picture of Ford F-600 Regular Cab Utility Body Truck Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 14 – 2 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 1     City Council 14 – 3 4/1/2025     City Council 14 – 4 4/1/2025     City Council 14 – 5 4/1/2025     City Council 14 – 6 4/1/2025     City Council 14 – 7 4/1/2025 QUOTATION CUSTOMER:   CITY OF SANTA ANA. CA DATE: 1/21/2025 SOURCEWELL MEMBER ACCOUNT NO. 1888 TERMS: NET 30 F.O.B:CUSTOMER PROJECT: SEWER DEPARTMENT 11FT UTILITY BODY QTY PART NO. DESCRIPTION PRICE EXTENSION PB LOADER CONTRACT NO. 080521-PBL SOURCEWELL CONTRACT MARKET PRICES MARKET PRICE UTILITIY TRUCK 1 $224,266.00 SUBTOTAL:$224,266.00 SALES TAX (9.25%):$20,744.61 CA TIRE RECYCLING FEE:$12.25 TOTAL:$245,022.86 NOTES: Delivery times are approximate. NO. 12556R 1. 25% DEPOSIT REQUIRED AT TIME OF ORDER. 2. PRICE INCUDES LICENSING AND DELIVERY. SALES TAX BASED ON ORANGE COUNTY. 3. PURCHASE ORDERS ARE TO BE MADE OUT TO PB LOADER CORPORATION . UTILITY TRUCK COMPLETE WITH: CHASSIS: 2025 F-600 CHASSIS 4X2 SD REGULAR CAB 169" WB DRW XL (F6K) WITH 7.3L V-8 DEVCT 335HP GAS ENGINE, TORQSHIFT 10-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION W/PTO PROVISION, 22,000 LB. GVWR PAYLOAD PACKAGE, 40-GALLON FUEL TANK, 19.5” ARGENT PAINTED STEEL WHEELS, RUNNING BOARDS, CAMERA PREP KIT, TRAILER BRAKE CONTROLLER, BACK- UP ALARM, FULL SIZE SPARE TIRE & WHEEL, TWO (2) EXTRA KEYS, MEDIUM DARK SLATE INTEROR W/ HEAVY DUTY VINYL 40/20/40 SPLIT BENCH SEAT AND EXTERIOR PAINTED OXFORD WHITE UTILITY BODY: FETERL MODEL 69550S UTILITY BODY APPROX. 11 FT LONG X 60" HIGH SIDE PACKS, SIDE PACK COMPARTMENTS ARE 21" DEEP, CONSTRUCTED FROM 10 GA. GALVANNEAL SHEET STEEL, INNER WALL AND TOPS ARE 12 GA TREAD PLATE, DOORS ARE 10 GA. GALVANNEAL, CARGO AREA IS 50" WIDE WITH THE FLOOR CONSTRUCTED FROM 1/8" TREAD PLATE, 6 FLUSH MOUNT 3/8" CHAIN TIE DOWNS , CONCEALED DOOR HINGES, OUTTER BODY IS SMOOTH WITH NO BENDS OUTWARD OR EXTERNAL HINGES TO MAKE A SMOOTH SIDED BODY FOR EASY CLEANING, INSTALLATION OF DECALS OR BODY WRAPS, INTERIOR OF COMPARTMENTS ARE SPRAYED WITH A DURABLE MATERIAL WITH A RUBBERIZED FEELING, GAS SHOCK SOFT-STOP DOOR OPENERS, DOORS HAVE WHALE TAIL KEYED ALIKE LATCHES, GANG LOCK DOOR SYSTEM PROVIDES A 3-POINT LOCKING SYSTEM AND LOCKS ALL DOORS ON EACH SIDE (EXCEPT FOR WORKBENCH DOOR) WITH ONE LEVER ON EACH SIDEPACK, THIS 3-POINT LOCKING SYSTEM ADDS EXTRA PROTECTION AGAINST THEFT, 10" DROP IN TAIL GATE AT REAR OF BODY, LED LIGHTING STRIPS IN ALL MAIN BODY COMPARTMENTS, RUBBER CROWN TYPE FENDERS, FULL LENGTH RAIN GUTTERS, AUTOMOTIVE TYPE WEATHER STRIPPING, MUD FLAPS, DOT APPROVED LIGHTING (LED), BACK UP ALARM, NON PRESURIZED CABINETS, LED STRIP LIGHTS MOUNTED ON ALL COMPARTMENT DOORS AND BODY FULLY UNDERCOATED. WORK BENCH: 24" WORK BENCH, REAR ENTRY WITH ONE CABLE STEP ON SS, 1/4" THICK TOP PLATE, CLASS 5 RECIEVER HITCH WITH 2" REDUCER SLEEVE, 7 POLE TRAILER RECEPTICAL TO BE TBD BY CITY OF SANTA ANA ALONG WITH WIRING DIAGRAM. NO SIDE ACCESS DOORS. TOP SURFACE WILL HAVE 2 STRIPS OF NON-SLIP SAFTY TAPE EACH BEING 6" WIDE THE FULL WIDTH OF THE WORKBENCH. A 90# JACKHAMMER HOLDER WILL BE INSET INTO THE DRIVERSIDE REAR OF THE WORKBENCH (OR CURBSIDE IF CUSTOMER PREFERS). A 3/4" X 50' AIR REEL, ELECTRIC OPERATED COX P/N 1125-5-50 WILL BE MOUNTED UNDERNEATH THE 1/4" TOP PLATE OF THE WORK BENCH TOWARD THE CS WITH THE HOSE COMING OUT OF THE REAR OF THE WORKBENCH. A WILTON 8" 1780 SWIVEL VISE WILL BE MOUNTED TO THE TOP OF THE WORKBENCH ON THE CS AND WILL BE ON A SLIDE, (APPROX 12") SO VISE CAN BE EXTENDED PAST THE CS SIDEPACK SO CUSTOMER CAN USE IT ON THE CS. TAMPER HOLDER: ONE TAMPER HOLDER MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE WORKBENCH AT THE REAR OF THE DS SIDE PACK NEXT TO THE CARGO AREA. BEDLINER: BEDLINER APPLIED TO CARGO FLOOR, DRIVER & CURBSIDE SIDEPACK WALLS. NOTE: TOPS OF SIDEPACKS WILL NOT BE BEDLINED BUT WILL BE PAINTED TO MATCH PIPE RACKS. BULKHEAD: FRONT BULKHEAD CONSTRUCTED FROM 7 GA. STEEL, STARTING FROM FLOOR TO TOP OF SIDE PACKS. E-TRACK & ACCESSORIES: E-TRACK INSTALLED ALONG DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE COMPARMENTS, 1 ROW 8" ABOVE BED AND THE SECOND ROW 6" FROM THE TOP OF SIDE PACK. SIXTEEN (16) E-TRACK ATTACHMENTS WITH A 2" ID PIPE TO HOLD 8 SHOVELS, ONE ATTACHMENT REQUIRED FOR TOP ROW AND ONE ATTACHMENT REQUIRED FOR BOTTOM ROW TO HOLD EACH SHOVEL, THESE SHOVEL ATTACHMENTS CAN BE PLACED AT ANY POINT ALONG THE E-TRACK TEN (10) E-TRACK ATTACHMENTS OF ASSORTED CONFIGUATIONS EIGHT (8) E-TRACK RATCHET STRAPS. COX P/N TSH-N-550 MOUNTED TRANSVERSE ON FRONT OF FRONT BUMPER WITH HOSE PROJECTING OUT TOWARD C/S WITH GATE VALVE DRIVER SIDE COMPARTMENT ACCESSORIES: 1ST COMPARTMENT APPROX. 26-5/8" WIDE WITH FIVE ADJUSTABLE SHELVES 2ND COMPARTMENT APPROX. 34-7/8" WIDE WITH FIVE ADJUSTABLE SHELVES 3RD WHEEL WELL COMPARTMENT APPROX 43-3/4" WIDE WITH THREE ADJUSTABLE SHELVES. 4TH REAR COMPARTMENT APPROX. 26-5/8" WIDE WITH PARTS STORAGE CABINET APPROXIMATELY 20" WIDE WITH 9 DRAWERS, EACH HAVING A 250# DRAWER RATING, TOP TO BOTTOM, TOP OF CABINET IS A SHELF, DRAWERS #1-2 ARE 3" HIGH AND HAVE DIVIDERS APPROXIMATELY EVERY 2", DRAWERS #3-6 ARE 4" HIGH AND HAVE NO DIVIDERS, DRAWERS #7-9 ARE 6" HIGH AND HAVE NO DIVIDERS. NOTE: DRAWER INSIDE HEIGHT IS 1" LESS THEN DRAWER HEIGHT. ALSO, ONE ADJUSTABLE SHELF ABOVE CABINET CURBISDE COMPARTMENT ACCESSORIES: 1ST COMPARTMENT APPROX. 26-5/8" WIDE WITH THREE TO FOUR ADJUSTABLE SHELVES DEPENDING ON HOW MUCH ROOM THE CONTROL PANELS NEED. THE CONTROL PANELS FOR THE VANAIR D80 AIR COMPRESSOR AND THE KUBOTA GENERATOR WILL BE MOUNTED TOWARD THE TOP OF THE COMPARTMENT 2ND COMPARTMENT APPROX. 34-7/8" WIDE WITH FOUR TO FIVE ADJUSTABLE SHELVES. INVERTOR WILL BE LOCATED ON TOP SHELF AND BATTERY STORAGE FOR BATTERY OPERATED POWER TOOLS WILL BE ON TOP SHELF. 3RD WHEEL WELL COMPARTMENT APPROX. 43-3/4" WIDE WITH THREE ADJUSTABLE SHELVES 4TH REAR COMPARTMENT APPROX. 26-5/8" WIDE WITH PARTS STORAGE CABINET APPROXIMATELY 20" WIDE WITH 9 DRAWERS, EACH HAVING A 250# DRAWER RATING, TOP TO BOTTOM, TOP OF CABINET IS A SHELF, DRAWERS #1-2 ARE 3" HIGH AND HAVE DIVIDERS APPROXIMATELY EVERY 2", DRAWERS #3-6 ARE 4" HIGH AND HAVE NO DIVIDERS, DRAWERS #7-9 ARE 6" HIGH AND HAVE NO DIVIDERS. NOTE: DRAWER INSIDE HEIGHT IS 1" LESS THEN DRAWER HEIGHT. ALSO ONE ADJUSTABLE SHELF ABOVE CABINET WILTON VISE: WILTON TRADESMAN SWIVEL VISE MODEL 1780-8" WIL-63202, MOUNTED ON A SLIDE THAT IS MOUNTED ON THE CURBSIDE OF THE WORKBENCH. THE SLIDE WILL ALLOW THE VISE TO BE EXTENDED PAST THE CS END OF THE WORKBENCH BY APPROX. 12 INCHES. INVERTER & OUTLET: 3000-WATT INVERTER MOUNTED IN CURBSIDE 2ND COMPARTMENT ON TOP SHELF ONE (1) FOUR PLEX OUTLET OR POWER STRIP MOUNTED IN THE CURBSIDE 2ND COMPARTMENT POWERED BY THE INVERTER GENERATOR & OUTLETS: KUBOTA LOWBOY II DIESEL GENERATOR-GL7000, 7KW STANDBY,6.5KW PRIME, SINGLE-PHASE, 120/240 VOLT, LIQUID COOLED WITH REMOTE START. REMOTE START PANEL WILL BE MOUNTED IN C/S 1ST CABINET TOWARD TOP. GENERATOR WILL BE LOCATED ON CS SIDEPACK TOWARD FRONT SO AS NOT TO INTERFER WITH PIONEER LIGHT. GENERATOR MAY OVERHANG OUTSIDE OF BODY BY 2-3" ONE (1) FOUR PLEX OUTLET MOUNTED AT THE REAR OF THE CS SIDE PACK POWERED BY THE GENERATOR ONE (1) DUPLEX PLEX OUTLET MOUNTED AT THE FRONT OF THE CS SIDE PACK OR UNDER THE CS SIDE PACK TOWARD THE FRONT POWERED BY THE GENERATOR. AIR COMPRESSOR & REELS: VANAIR D80 AIR COMPRESSOR, MODEL 050850-002, 80CFM @ 100PSI MOUNTED ON THE FLOOR TOWARD THE FRONT OF THE SERVICE BODY BETWEEN THE SIDEPACKS, REMOTE PANEL TO CONTROL AIR COMPRESSOR WILL BE MOUNTED IN THE CURBSIDE 1ST COMPARTMENT, TOWARD THE TOP. ONE (1) 3/4" X 50' AIR REEL, ELECTRIC OPERATED COX P/N 1125-5-50 WILL BE MOUNTED UNDERNEATH THE 1/4" TOP PLATE OF THE WORK BENCH TOWARD THE CS WITH THE HOSE COMING OUT OF THE REAR OF THE WORKBENCH WITH GATE VALVE ONE (1) 3/4" X 50 FT AIR REEL SPRING RETRACTABLE COX P/N TSH-N-550 MOUNTED TRANSVERSE ON FRONT OF FRONT BUMPER WITH HOSE PROJECTING OUT TOWARD C/S WITH GATE VALVE WARNING & WORK LIGHTS: ONE (1) NATIONAL SIGNAL LOW PROFILE ELECTRIC TILTING 24" X 48" ARROW BOARD MOUNTED OVER CHASSES CAB DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF BODY. ONE (1) WHELEN PIONEER SERIES MODEL PCH1P1 FLOOD LIGHT WITH MODEL 86930PB4 57" TELESCOPING POLE MOUNTED ON FRONT OF CS SIDEPACK IN FRONT OF GENERATOR. SIX (6) WHELEN AMBER STROBE LIGHTS. WHELEN P/N WLN-5VA02ZAR VERTICAL STROBES MOUNTED 2) ON THE GRILL, 2) MID BODY & 2) ON REAR OF BODY ON EACH SIDE PACK TOWARD THE TOP. ONE (1) RIGID INDUSTRIES Q-SERIES DIFFUSED FLOOD LIGHT, P/N 245513, MOUNTED ON HEADACHE RACK POINTING INTO CARGO AREA. ONE (1) RIGID INDUSTRIES Q-SERIES DIFFUSED FLOOD LIGHT, P/N 245513, MOUNTED IN FRONT OF BODY UNDER PIPE RACK ON DRIVERSIDE POINTING OUTWARD CONE HOLDERS: TWO (2) CONE HOLDERS IN FRONT OF THE CHASSIS CLOSE TO THE AIR REELS CURBSIDE STORAGE BASKET: STORAGE BASKET WILL BE WELDED OR BOLTED ONTO TOP OF CS SIDE PACK. BASKET WILL START APPROX. 6-8" BEHIND GENERATOR AND EXTEND TO THE REAR OF THE SIDE PACK. BASKET WILL BE CONSTRUCTED USING FLATTENED EXPANDED METEL ON THE SIDES. STRUCTURAL ANGLE IRON AND/OR STRUCTURAL TUBING WILL BE AT THE TOP OF THE BASKET FOR REINFORCEMENT. THE FRONT OF THE BASKET WILL BE APPROX. 24" TALL TO PROTECT GENERATOR AND WILL BE MADE OF SHEET STEEL. THE REAR OF BASKET WILL ALSO BE SHEET STEEL. BASKET WILL BE APPROX. 12 INCHES TALL. BASKET WILL BE PAINTED SAME COLOR AS BODY. CURBSIDE STORAGE BASKET: STORAGE BASKET WILL CONSIST OF A BOTTOM SECTION BUILT SIMILAR TO THE BASKET ON THE CURBSIDE. IT WILL ALSO BE 12 INCHES TALL AND HAVE SHEET STEEL WELDED ENDS. THE BOTTOM SECTION WILL BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE DRIVERSIDE SIDE PACK. THE TOP SECTION WILL BE APPROX 19-20 FEET LONG AND EXTEND OVER THE CAB OF THE CHASSIS WITH 6-INCH EARS EXTENDING UPWARD ON BOTH SIDES APPROX. EVERY 4-5 FEET. THE FRONT WILL HAVE A SHEET STEEL BANG BOARD WELDED SO AS TO KEEP PIPE FROM SHIFTING FORWARD, THE REAR WILL BE OPEN. THERE WILL BE TWO (2) MODEL “RACK-STRAP” MODEL RS1 RACHET STRAPS MOUNTED TO THE TOP RAIL OF THE BOTTOM BASKET ON THE (CARGO SIDE). THIS RACK WILL BE BUILD SIMILAR TO THE PHOTOS PROVIDED. THE RACK WILL BE PAINTED SAME COLOR AS THE BODY. PB Loader Corporation 5778 W. Barstow • Fresno, California 93722-5024 • Telephone (559) 277-7370 • Fax (559) 277-7375 Toll free 800-350-8521 • Web www.pbloader.com EXHIBIT 2     City Council 14 – 8 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3     City Council 14 – 9 4/1/2025 Finance & Management Services www.santa-ana.org/finance Item # 15 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Citywide Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies AGENDA TITLE Citywide Purchase Order Contract with Grainger, Inc. for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies (Specification No. 25-048) (General Fund and Non-General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Award a Citywide Purchase Order Contract to Grainger, Inc. for online marketplace purchases of goods for a four year term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March, 31, 2029, for an annual amount not-to-exceed $400,000, for a total contract amount not-to- exceed $1,600,000. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION The Purchasing Division establishes annual Citywide purchase order contracts with vendors that provide goods and services required by multiple City departments on a recurring basis. These contracts provide an alternative to other agreements, helping departments manage costs while benefiting from vendor convenience. Grainger, Inc. provides a variety of essential items, including miscellaneous supplies, parts, equipment, and materials needed for general maintenance and repairs throughout the City. Various departments, including Public Works, Police, Jail, Fleet, Facilities, and Parks & Recreation, rely on these contracts to order supplies as needed, ensuring uninterrupted operations and facility management. Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-3041 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. Omnia, a cooperative government purchasing agency, awarded a contract to Grainger, Inc. (Contract No. 240078-01) for maintenance repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, and materials as a result of open, competitive bidding, and meets the City’s requirements. Staff researched available procurement options and product offerings in the market and determined that the MRO supplies, parts, equipment, and materials provided by Grainger, Inc. enables City staff to procure as-needed materials as efficiently as possible when out in the field maintaining City facilities. By leveraging the procurement power through cooperative purchasing, the City of Santa Ana is able to obtain nationally vetted, high quality products     City Council 15 – 1 4/1/2025 Citywide Purchase Order Contract for Maintenance, Repair, and Operational Supplies April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 2 6 at competitive volume pricing, and is in accordance with the City’s existing Purchasing Guidelines. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funding is available in the FY 24-25 budget, with $100,000 allocated under various departmental Miscellaneous Operating Expense accounts (No. 63001). Funding for subsequent fiscal years will also be included in these Miscellaneous Operating Expense accounts as part of proposed budgets for City Council consideration. An estimated annual amount of $400,000 may be utilized, but actual usage will vary based on needs and budget capacity. However, total expenditures will not exceed the contract limit of $1,600,000. Prior to utilizing the citywide contracts, the requesting departments will follow the Purchasing Policies and Procedures and ensure funds are available. Upon successful completion of the fiscal review, the Purchasing Division will approve orders in accordance with the Policy. Submitted By: Alex Trinidad, Acting Finance and Management Services Agency Executive Director Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 15 – 2 4/1/2025 Human Resources Department www.santa-ana.org/human-resources Item # 16 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: City Manager Performance Evaluation and Compensation Adjustment AGENDA TITLE Approve a First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve a first amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez reflecting the positive City Manager performance evaluation conducted on March 18, 2025 and approving an adjusted annual salary for the City Manager of $340,200 (Agreement No. A-2025-XXX). 2. Adopt a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan with the amended annual salary for City Manager and approving the Council Appointee Salary Schedule in compliance with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION The City’s employment agreement with Alvaro Nuñez was first approved on August 6, 2024. The City Charter provides that the City Council shall conduct performance evaluations of its appointees on an annual basis. In addition, the City Manager’s employment agreement provides for a review to evaluate the performance of the City Manager at least 120 days following the commencement of his job as the City Manager and annually thereafter. The City Council conducted a performance evaluation of the City Manager on March 18, 2025. The City Manager received a positive performance evaluation and proposed a salary increase to $340,200, effective March 18, 2025. The City Council can approve the proposed First Amendment to the City Manager Employment Agreement to grant a salary increase (Exhibit 1). The proposed resolution     City Council 16 – 1 4/1/2025 City Manager Performance Evaluation and Salary Adjustment April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 3 6 amends the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan and approves the Council Appointee Salary Schedule to reflect the aforementioned City Manager salary adjustment (Exhibit 2). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There are no environmental impacts associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of these actions will result in an annual total increase of approximately $7,834 in Fiscal Year 2024-25. There are sufficient funds in the City Manager’s Office budget (account 011-03-010-61000) to cover the increased costs in the current fiscal year. Estimated total General Fund fiscal impact for FY2025-26 is $27,591. EXHIBIT(S) 1. First Amendment to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Santa Ana and Alvaro Nuñez affirming a positive performance evaluation and approving an annual salary adjustment for the City Manager; and 2. Resolution amending the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan and approving the amended Council Appointee Salary Schedule Submitted By: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Approved By: Kathryn Downs, Assistant City Manager     City Council 16 – 2 4/1/2025     City Council 16 – 3 4/1/2025     City Council 16 – 4 4/1/2025 Resolution 2025-XXX Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EFFECT CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana (“City”) hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. Section 1004 of the City Charter of the City requires the City Manager to prepare, install, and maintain a position classification and pay plan subject to civil service rules and regulations and the approval of the City Council. B. It is the City’s practice to assign job titles that reflect the duties and responsibilities of the classification and are consistent with other classifications within the City’s organizational structure, as well as comparable job titles in the labor market, while maintaining internal pay equity relationships and attracting and retaining qualified candidates. C. The City Council regularly amends the City’s classification and compensation plan for all full-time and part-time classifications of officers and employees of the City of Santa Ana. D. The City Council approved a salary adjustment for the City Manager from $315,000 to $340,200 effective March 18, 2025. E. It is now desired to amend the City’s classification and compensation plan to reflect the approved change to the City Manager’s salary. Section 2. The Santa Ana City Council hereby approves an updated Salary Schedule for the Council Appointee unit, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, reflecting classification and compensation amendments per previously approve d City Council agreements and amendments to agreements, grouped by employee unit as recommended by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (“CalPERS”), and in compliance with CalPERS and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5. Section 3. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 2024-060. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest and certify the vote adopting this resolution.     City Council 16 – 5 4/1/2025 Resolution 2025-XXX Page 2 of 3 ADOPTED this 1st day of April 2025. ___________________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: __________________ Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2025-___ to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on April 1, 2025. Date: ___________________ ____________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana     City Council 16 – 6 4/1/2025 Resolution 2025-XXX Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A COUNCIL APPOINTEE SALARY SCHEDULE REVISED APRIL 1, 2025 EFFECTIVE MARCH 18, 2025 JOB TITLE JOB CODE ANNUAL PAY RATE City Manager (EM) 01790 340,200 City Clerk (EM) 01990 195,083     City Council 16 – 7 4/1/2025 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 17 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Fire Station 70 Restroom Remodel and Generator Replacement AGENDA TITLE Construction Contract to BNS Construction for the Fire Station 70, 2301 Old Grand Street, Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade (Project No. 24-6626) (General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an amendment to the FY 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program to include $716,250 in construction funds for the Fire Station 70 Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Project. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $716,250 which includes $573,000 for the construction contract, $85,950 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $57,300 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Award a construction contract to BNS Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $573,000, subject to change orders, for the remodel of Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom and Generator Replacement for a term beginning upon April 1, 2025, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. 4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2025-11 was filed for project 24-6626. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency’s (PWA) Parks, Fleet, and Facilities team maintains most City facilities, including ten fire stations occupied by the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). Together with OCFA, staff assessed all Santa Ana fire stations and prioritized repairs and improvements. It was identified that the restrooms at Fire Station 70, located at 2301 Old Grand Street (Exhibit 1), currently do not meet the accessibility standards set by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and require remodeling. Built     City Council 17 – 1 4/1/2025 Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom Remodel and Generator Replacement April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 2 1 in 1971, this fire station’s restroom is original to the structure. Additionally, the emergency generator, which powers the facility during power outages, is 54 years old and has become outdated and in need of replacement. Improvements to the facility include updating lighting, plumbing fixtures, finishes, demolition and installation of non-loadbearing interior partitions and ceiling finishes, and replacing the outdated generator on a level, flat, and hardened concrete pad. The pad will offer a level base for the generator, protect it from damage, and enhance safety and efficiency. Once completed, these improvements will ensure the facility remains in compliance with the latest building codes and ADA standards. A copy of construction plans, contracts, specifications, and all related reference materials (such as The Greenbook) are available for public review at the City’s Public Works Agency, Central Files office located in City Hall. Contractor Participation To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, the City notified a total of 2,620 regional vendors via PlanetBids, several of which are Santa Ana based. A total of 23 bids were received. No bids were received from Santa Ana contractors. As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on December 2, 2024 and December 9, 2024. This project was also advertised in PlanetBids on November 26, 2024. Bids were received electronically via Planet Bids on January 13, 2025. No bid protest was submitted by any of the bidders during the bid protest period. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER’S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 1 BNS Construction Tarzana, CA $573,000 2 Estate Design and Construction Los Angeles, CA $610,557 3 Rhome Profile Construction Bellflower, CA $632,643 4 Triangle DeCon Services, Inc.Mission Viejo, CA $696,500 5 American Construction Company Anaheim, CA $704,513 6 Global Builders Inc.Laguna Hills, CA $749,888 7 R Dependable Const Inc.San Bernardino, CA $749,997 8 Fidelity Builders, Inc.Glendale, CA $787,700 9 Ambit Construction & Design, Inc.Los Angeles, CA $799,200 10 Far West Contractors Placentia, CA $860,022 11 KAH Construction LLC Canyon Country, CA $992,321 12 Loengreen, Inc.Los Angeles, CA $1,076,005 13 JRH Construction Company, Inc.Tustin, CA $1,077,261 14 AVA Builders, Inc.North Hollywood, CA $1,087,022 15 Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd Newport Beach, CA $1,102,005     City Council 17 – 2 4/1/2025 Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom Remodel and Generator Replacement April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 2 1 RANK BIDDER’S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 16 U.S Builders & Consultants Irvine, CA $1,138,700 17 Marjani Builders, Inc.Rancho Mission Viejo, CA $1,144,022 18 Urban Professional Builders, Inc.Pasadena, CA $1,264,022 19 The Nazerian Group Encino, CA $1,294,123 20 BBS Construction, Inc.West Covina, CA $1,332,022 21 Accurate Construction Company Inc.Covina, CA $1,336,092 22 MLC Constructors Inc.Corona, CA $1,344,181 A total of 23 bids were received and one was deemed unresponsive. BNS Construction submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $573,000 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the base bid. This will be the first project BNS Construction will build in Santa Ana. BNS Construction has done similar projects in the past for other agencies. Most recently, they completed a similar ADA restroom renovation project for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Contracting Office in Yorba Linda, CA. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor’s reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to BNS Construction (Exhibit 3). Project Delivery To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected or unforeseen conditions. Construction administration and inspection includes construction management and implementation of the labor requirements. Any of the allocated construction administration funds not spent are considered project savings and are returned to the respective fund balance upon close out of the project. As indicated in the Cost Analysis and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $716,250. Project Item Total Construction Contract Bid Amount $ 573,000 Construction Administration 42,975 Inspection 25,785 Testing 17,190 Project Contingencies 57,300 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $ 716,250     City Council 17 – 3 4/1/2025 Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom Remodel and Generator Replacement April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 2 1 Project Schedule and Contract Time The project completion date is March 2026, barring unforeseeable conditions such as rain, natural disasters, or other delays beyond the control of the City and of the Contractor. The contract for this project is 150 working days, as specified in the bid documents. Working days are counted in accordance with the City’s Standard Specifications, which exclude weekends, City-observed holidays, and inclement weather days that prevent work. The projected project schedule is provided below: Project Milestones Milestone Estimated Completion Date Notes Administrative Startup April 2025 Contract execution, bonds, insurance Material Procurement April-August 2025 Procurement for long lead items (panel, generator, automatic transfer switch, electrical fixtures) Contractor Mobilization August 2025 Start of construction activities Project Completion March 2026 Based on 150 working days Project Phasing The contractor will be constructing this project in one singular phase, fulfilling the scope of work as outlined in the contract documents. Due to the long lead times in securing project materials, on-site work will not commence until materials have been secured (approx. August 2025). The contractor is responsible for determining the scheduling and sequencing of activities based on their proposed means and methods. Public Outreach Construction will be confined to the fire station, ensuring that the community and neighborhoods remain unaffected. Staff has continuously met with OCFA to discuss the impact on their fire station. The contractor and staff will coordinate with OCFA throughout the project construction and will install signage at the project site indicating project details and contact information. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Review No. ER-2025-11 was filed for the project 24-6626 (Exhibit 4). FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $716,250. All funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be presented to City Council for approval to carry forward to Fiscal Year 2025-2026 (Exhibit 5).     City Council 17 – 4 4/1/2025 Fire Station 70 ADA Restroom Remodel and Generator Replacement April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 2 1 The proposed contract enables staff to authorize a construction cost increase of up to 10%, if necessary for contingencies. Staff expects to utilize other available Public Works appropriations if a contingency becomes necessary to complete the project. If there are no other available appropriations, staff will return to City Council with a project update and recommendations. The funds are budgeted and available in the following accounts for this project. Fiscal Year Accounting Unit - Account No. (Project No.) Fund Description Accounting Unit, Account Description Amount Current Budget 2024-25 01115017-62300 (24-6626) General Fund Fire – Service Enhancement, Contract Services - Professional 635,861 2024-25 01115330-62300 (24-6626) General Fund Fire Suppression/EMS, Contract Services - Professional 80,389 TOTAL $716,250 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Location Map 2. Bid Proposal 3. Construction Contract 4. Environmental Determination 5. Capital Improvement Project Worksheet Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 17 – 5 4/1/2025 PWA SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Project Nos. 24-6626: OCFA Fire Station #70 Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade 2301 Old Grand St, Santa Ana, CA 92705 EXHIBIT 1     City Council 17 – 6 4/1/2025 BNS Construction 557,978.00 557,978.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 8,022.00 573,000.00     City Council 17 – 7 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-2 of P-18 Proceed. Upon issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Contractor shall immediately place order for long-lead time items. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $3,600 per calendar day. Name of Firm Signature of BIDDER Title (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co-partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) BNS Construction Owner     City Council 17 – 8 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-3 of P-18 BIDDER’S STATEMENT BIDDER understands and agrees that this Bid Proposal, Contract Documents and subsequent Construction Contract Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between BIDDER and the AGENCY only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Public Works Agency Executive Director or his/her duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to BIDDER or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the BIDDER with the correct postage affixed thereto. BIDDER further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above) of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish AGENCY all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) business days or the funds, check, draft, or BIDDERS bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the AGENCY and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by AGENCY because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check, drafts, or BIDDER’S bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned. BIDDER understands that a bid is required for the entire work, the estimated quantities set forth in the bid schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. The BIDDER also certifies that the bid is a balanced bid. In accordance with Section 7028.15 of the California Business and Professions Code, the undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Name of Firm Signature of BIDDER Title (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co-partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) BNS Construction Owner     City Council 17 – 9 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-4 of P-18 CONTRACTOR’S LICENSING AND REGISTRATION STATEMENT The undersigned contractor, or corporate officer, declares under penalty of perjury that he/she and all his/her subcontractors are registered with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), and that the following is true and correct. Contractor’s Name: Business Address: Business E-Mail Address: Telephone: State Contractor’s License No. and Class: License Expiration Date: State Dept. of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration No.: State Dept. of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration Expiration Date: Signed: Title: BNS Construction 18440 Hatteras St. #33, Tarzana, CA 91356 sales@bnsconstruct.com 818-535-1006 California, 758726, class: B, C-21, ASB 02/28/2027 2000006915 Owner 06/30/2025     City Council 17 – 10 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-5 of P-18 PREVAILING WAGE COMPLIANCE AND MONITORING STATEMENT Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16,000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. Since the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor’s principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The undersigned certifies that the foregoing is true and correct. Name of Firm Signature of BIDDER Title (if an individual, so state) BNS Construction Owner     City Council 17 – 11 4/1/2025     City Council 17 – 12 4/1/2025     City Council 17 – 13 4/1/2025     City Council 17 – 14 4/1/2025     City Council 17 – 15 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-8 of P-18 LIST OF SUB-CONTRACTORS Section 4100 et. seq. of the Public Contract Code requires listing of all subcontractors with the bid for all subcontract work exceeding the following amount: o Streets, highways including bridge projects: ½% of the bid or $10,000, whichever is greater o Buildings, parks, or other projects: ½% of the bid Section 1725.5 of the Public Contract Code requires all Subcontractors be registered with the State Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). BIDDER proposes to subcontract certain portions of the work to the firms listed below: Name Name License #/Exp. License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. Location Location Phone Phone Type Of Work Type Of Work Amount $ Amount $ Name Name License #/Exp. License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # License # Location Location Phone Phone Type Of Work Type Of Work Amount $ Amount $ Name Name License #/Exp. License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # License # Location Location Phone Phone Type Of Work Type Of Work Amount $ Amount $ Signature of Bidder I builders 4 u 988185 06/30/2025 18375 Ventura Blvd, unit 148. Tarzana, 91356 818-383-3353 Concrete, Finishes 56,868     City Council 17 – 16 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-9 of P-18 REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for THREE public agencies for which the BIDDER has performed similar work within the past three years. 1. Name and Address of Owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. Name and Address of owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. Name and Address of owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds. Shay PhilipsS Philips Surety & Insurance Services Inc22647 Ventura Bl #349Woodland Hills, CA 91364818-715-7133 VA contracting office, 18801 Haven Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92886 (714) 803-5387 leave a message and she will call you back Ginny Bolle $88,000 ADA Bathroom Remodeling VA 1/29/2023 8 units ADA Bathroom Remodeling $440,000 10/20/2022 Joram Kesten 818-398-5125 18627 Topham St. Tarzana, CA 91356Topham LLC, Lawrence Mcmahan, 216-258-4707 VA federal Project, Acton VA Adaptable Bathroom Acton$99,480.00 02/04/2021     City Council 17 – 17 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-10 of P-18 ADDITIONAL REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for THREE public agencies for which the BIDDER or Subcontractor has performed similar work in the past five years. 1. Name and Address of Owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. Name and Address of owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. Name and Address of owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds. Shay PhilipsS Philips Surety & Insurance Services Inc22647 Ventura Bl #349Woodland Hills, CA 91364818-715-7133 shay@spbonds.com Subcontractor project: 4M Investment, 12300 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90025 David Marzini, 818-339-3653 $734,000 12300 Whilsire TI 10/12/2022 Federal Aviation , Lihue Airport, HI Ira Farnoush, (310) 880-0462 $88,000.00 Lihue Vortac Refurbishment, 1/20/2020 Remove, Refurbish the Upolu VOR (Teepee & Tacan) and Reinstall 10/28/2023     City Council 17 – 18 4/1/2025     City Council 17 – 19 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-12 of P-18 NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATE The undersigned contractor or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Contractor shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Contractor shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers’ representatives of the Contractor’s commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Contractor shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Contractor shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Contractor’s non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.     City Council 17 – 20 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-13 of P-18 7. The Contractor shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Contractor may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any contractor of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: Owner BNS Construction 1/13/2025     City Council 17 – 21 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-14 of P-18 STATEMENT REGARDING APPRENTICESHIP REQUIREMENTS The undersigned BIDDER is familiar with the requirements of Section 1777.5 of the State Labor Code regarding employment of apprentices, and understands that contractors on contracts exceeding $30,000 or 20 working days shall: 1. Apply to the joint apprenticeship committee administering the apprenticeship standards of the craft or trade in the area of the site of the public work for a certificate approving the contractor under the apprenticeship standards for the employment and training of apprentices in the area or industry affected. 2. Employ the number of apprentices or the ratio of apprentices to journeymen stipulated in the apprenticeship standards. 3. Contribute to the fund or funds in each craft or trade in which he/she employs journeymen or apprentices on the public work, in the same amount or upon the same basis and in the same manner as the other contractors, except contractors not signatory to the trust agreement shall pay a like amount to the California Apprenticeship Council. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: Owner BNS Construction 1/13/2025     City Council 17 – 22 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-15 of P-18 STATEMENT REGARDING “ANTI-KICKBACK” REQUIREMENTS The undersigned is submitting this proposal for performing by contract the work required by these bid documents, agrees to comply with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (18 USC 74) as supplemented in the Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR, Part 3). This act provides that each contractor or subcontractor shall be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he/she is otherwise entitled. Signed: Title: Firm: Owner BNS Construction     City Council 17 – 23 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-16 of P-18 FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct: The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third party correspondence or vendor bids). The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Name of Bidder: Signature: Name: Title: Date: BNS Construction Ron Shashua Owner 1/13/2025     City Council 17 – 24 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-17 of P-18 PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 10162 QUESTIONNAIRE In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the BIDDER shall complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire: Has the BIDDER, any officer of the BIDDER, or any employee of the BIDDER who has a proprietary interest in the BIDDER, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation? Yes No If the answer is yes, explain the circumstances in the following space.     City Council 17 – 25 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-18 of P-18 STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned BIDDER, and subcontractors, have read and understood the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, the Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The undersigned BIDDER hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and is capable of completing construction of the project continuously, and without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, BIDDER will also be required to sign the Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA. The undersigned BIDDER has reviewed the Public Works Construction Permit and required deposit described in Section 2-2a and the Notice of Inviting Bids. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: Owner BNS Construction 1/13/2025     City Council 17 – 26 4/1/2025 rev. 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 4 CITY OF SANTA ANA CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AGREEMENT PROJECT NO.: 24-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 1st day of April, 2025 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter “CITY”), and BNS Construction (hereinafter “CONTRACTOR”). WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the OCFA Fire Station #70 Remodel, ADA Restroom and Generator Upgrade Project (hereinafter referred to as the “WORK OF IMPROVEMENT”) identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City’s Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2.The complete Construction Contract consists of the “Contract Documents” as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: •Notice Inviting Bids •Information to Bidders •Bid Proposal •Bid Bond •Contract Form •Contract Bonds •General Provisions •Special Provisions •Technical Provisions and Project Plans •Community Workforce Agreement •Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 3.CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Five Hundred Seventy-Three Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($573,000.00), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A,” and in accordance with Section 2-7.1 of the Greenbook: Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. EXHIBIT 3     City Council 17 – 27 4/1/2025 Page 2 of 4 The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit “A”) including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY’S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City’s website at: https://www.santa-ana.org/documents/community-workforce-agreement/ 7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. 8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker’s Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. 10. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to CITY, from and against any liability, claims, actions, costs, damages or losses, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for injury, including death to any person or damage to any property, arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to, any of the following:     City Council 17 – 28 4/1/2025 Page 3 of 4 (i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work of Improvement by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier; (ii) Performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents; (iii) The construction activities of CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, either on the project site or on other properties; (iv) The payment or nonpayment by CONTRACTOR of any of its Subcontractors of any lower tier, for Work of Improvement performed on or off the project site; and (v) Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons related to and arising from the performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of the Work of Improvement. (vi) The indemnity obligations of Subcontractors provided by this Section shall be included in all subcontract documents issued by CONTRACTOR. Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee. [signature page to follow]     City Council 17 – 29 4/1/2025 Page 4 of 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA JENNIFER L. HALL ALVARO NUNEZ City Clerk City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO CONTRACTOR: City Attorney BNS Construction By: KYLE NELLESEN NAME: TITLE: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: NABIL SABA, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency Assistant City Attorney Ron Shashua Owner Nabil Saba Digitally signed by Nabil Saba Date: 2025.03.17 11:40:23 -07'00'     City Council 17 – 30 4/1/2025 BNS Construction 557,978.00 557,978.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 8,022.00 573,000.00     City Council 17 – 31 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 23-6626 OCFA FIRE STATION #70 REMODEL, ADA RESTROOM AND GENERATOR UPGRADE P-2 of P-18 Proceed. Upon issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Contractor shall immediately place order for long-lead time items. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $3,600 per calendar day. Name of Firm Signature of BIDDER Title (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co-partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) BNS Construction Owner     City Council 17 – 32 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 4     City Council 17 – 33 4/1/2025     City Council 17 – 34 4/1/2025     City Council 17 – 35 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 5     City Council 17 – 36 4/1/2025 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 18 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project Cooperative Agreement AGENDA TITLE Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25-6705) (Non-General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $760,855 in matching funding from the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, into the Public Works Measure M-Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (03217002-57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Measure M-Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (03217663- 66220) for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program to include city match reimbursement funding in the amount of $760,855 for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project No. 25-6705). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, which identifies each city’s roles and responsibilities to implement the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a term beginning upon full approval of the agreement by all parties and effective until December 31, 2030, with an option for extension (Agreement No. A-2025-XXX). GOVERNMENT §84308 CODE APPLIES: No DISCUSSION On November 21, 2023, the City Council authorized staff to submit a competitive grant application for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (Project) with participating agencies for the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program. On May 13, 2024, the OCTA Board of Directors approved     City Council 18 – 1 4/1/2025 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project Cooperative Agreement April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 1 8 awarding the City of Santa Ana and partnering agencies $4,568,526 for the Project which requires the City and partnering agencies to provide matching funds of 20% for the project in the amount of $1,142,132, of which the City of Santa Ana’s share is $381,277. The match commitments from the other four participating cities will provide a combined total of $760,855. The FY 2024 Call for Projects Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project P Supplementation Application (Exhibit 1) shows the improvements for each partnering agency along with associated cost, grant funding, and agency matching funds. The City of Santa Ana’s share of the matching funds is $381,277, of which $351,277 is cash and $30,000 is in-kind staff support. The City’s staff time and resources spent in support of the project will be counted as an “in-kind” contribution, meaning non-monetary costs of service, and will count towards the total agency match. The Fairshare contribution from each city is proportioned to the amount of improvements within their segment of the street, of which Santa Ana has the highest amount of improvements. The City Council authorized an appropriation adjustment recognizing the Measure M2 grant funding from OCTA on October 15, 2024. As a follow up action and approval of the above recommended actions, this would allow the City to receive the necessary matching funds from the partnering agencies to complete the project funding. The City of Santa Ana elected to lead the project on behalf of the partnering agencies due the significance of this corridor in the Santa Ana traffic signal synchronization network and the majority of the traffic signals in the corridor are owned and operated by City of Santa Ana. While the City of Santa Ana will act as lead agency for the project, a cooperative agreement is necessary to identify the roles and responsibilities of each participating agency. The partnering agencies will work collaboratively with the City to design and construct the Project. This includes designating lead staff to act as liaisons for the Project in the coordination with contractors, consultants, construction inspection, and traffic signal timing implementation. The cooperative agreement would provide for inter-jurisdictional traffic signal synchronization and improvements along the corridor traversing Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, Orange, and Caltrans (Exhibit 2). This corridor serves a wide range of land uses with very high morning and evening peak traffic volumes, including over 40,000 vehicles per day in the City of Santa Ana. The proposed traffic signal synchronization and improvements will enhance traffic flow along the corridor by reducing travel time, stops, delays, and traffic congestion in the City and the region. These improvements align with the Cities’ adopted Local Signal Synchronization Plan which strives to relieve traffic congestion on the arterial roadways and to work cooperatively with local agencies, Caltrans, and OCTA to improve the flow of traffic across agency boundaries.     City Council 18 – 2 4/1/2025 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project Cooperative Agreement April 1, 2025 Page 3 4 9 1 8 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the requested appropriation adjustment will recognize $760,855 Fiscal Year 2024-25 funds into the Public Works Measure M-Street Construction, Expense Reimbursement revenue account (No. 03217002-57000) and appropriate the same amount into the Public Works Measure M2 Competitive Street, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 03217663-66220) (Exhibit 3). The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available in current FY 24-25 for design engineering and construction expenditures after the appropriation adjustment. Any unspent budget in Fiscal Year 2024-25 will be included in future-year carryforwards for City Council consideration. Fiscal Year Accounting Unit – Account No. (Project No.) Fund Description Accounting Unit – Account No. Description Amount Current Budget 2024-25 03217663-66220 (25-6705) Measure M – Street Construction Measure M2 Competitive Street, Improvements Other Than Buildings $4,568,526 2024-25 03217662-66220 (25-6705) Measure M – Street Construction Measure M2 Local Fairshare St, Improvements Other Than Buildings $381,277 Appropriation Adjustment 2024-25 03217663-66220 (25-6705) Measure M – Street Construction Measure M2 Competitive Street, Improvements Other Than Buildings $760,855 TOTAL $5,710,658 EXHIBIT(S) 1. FY 2024 Call for Projects Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project P Supplementation Application 2. Cooperative Agreement 3. Capital Improvements Project Worksheet Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 18 – 3 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 1 FY 2024 Call for Projects Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Project P Supplemental Application Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor 10/26/2023 Application Deadline Project Overview Length of Corridor (mi): 15.1 Number of signals: 61 Total Project Cost: $5,710,657.50 M2 funds requested: $4,568,526.00 Total Match: $1,142,131.50 Cash Match: $1,112,131.50 In-kind Match: $30,000.00 Participating Agencies:Santa Ana Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Caltrans Applicant Agency: City of Santa Ana Contact Name: Cesar Rodriguez Contact Number: 714-647-54626 Contact Email: crodirguez5@santa-ana.org     City Council 18 – 4 4/1/2025 Project P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Table of Contents Project P Supplemental Application Checklist Page RTSSP Online Application – submitted through OCFundTracker a. Transportation Significance b. Economic Effectiveness c. Project Characteristics Onlined. Project Scale e. Number of Jurisdictions f. Current Project Status g. Funding Match h. Cabinet photos, equipment specifications, as-built drawings, cabinet drawings, etc. Section 1: Key Technical Information a. Name of Project Corridor/Grid/Route b. Project Limits Online only 1 1 1c. Project Length 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 d. Number of Signalized Intersections Along Corridor e. Participating Agencies/Traffic Forum Members f. Lead Agency g. Designation of the corridor to synchronize h. Project Start and End Date i. Previous funding j. Contact Information k. Signalized intersections that are part of the project l. Offset signalized intersections that are part of the project m. Project Map Depicting the Project Limits Section 2: Regional Significance Section 3: Acknowledgement of Required Tasks Section 4: Funding Needs/Costs for Proposed Project by Task a. Summary of Project Cost 4 5-8 9 b. Summary of Cost by Agency 10-11 12-13 14 c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs Section 5: Detailed Local Match Commitment Section 6: Project Schedule by Task a. Project Start and End Dates 15 15b. Project Schedule by Task Appendices A. Calculations and Estimated Points B. Agency Improvement Calculations C. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) D. Agency Resolutions and Letters of Support E. Cabinet Photos and As-built drawings (Uploaded to OCFundTracker and included in Electronic Submittal Only) i     City Council 18 – 5 4/1/2025 SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION a. Project Corridor Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor b. Project Limits: from Lambert Road to Dyer Road c. Project Length (miles ): 15.14 d. Number of signalized intersections along the corridor (include all Caltrans intersections): 61 number of offset signals included in this projectnumber of signals on project corridor(s)3 e. Participating agencies / Traffic Forum Members (including applicant agency ):San Juan Capistrano Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Aliso Viejo Anaheim Cypress La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Mission Viejo Newport Beach Dana Point Fountain Valley Fullerton Brea Buena Park Caltrans Laguna Beach Laguna Hills Laguna Niguel Laguna Woods Lake Forest Orange Tustin Villa Park Westminster Yorba Linda Garden Grove Huntington Beach Irvine Placentia Rancho Santa Margarita San Clemente Costa Mesa County of Orange f. Lead Agency Santa Ana g. Designation of the corridor to synchronize: Signal Synchronization Network Corridor / Priority Corridor Master Plan of Arterial Highways Corridor h. Project Start Date: i. Select any that apply: January 1, 2025 Project End Date:December 31, 2027 Re-timing at least 75% of previous project Timing at least 75% of new eligible project None All participating agencies are participating in the Countywide Baseline Project j. Contact Information (Include name, title, agency, phone, email, and address) Cesar Rodriguez, Senior Civil Engineer City of Santa Ana, 714-647-5626 crodriguez5@santa-ana.org 20 Civic Center Plaza Albert Espinoza, City Engineer City of Brea, 714-990-7657 alberte@ci.brea.ca.us 1 Civic Center Circle Brea, CA 92821Santa Ana, CA 92701 Kyra Tao, Transportation Manager City of Placentia, 714-993-8121 ktao@placentia.org John Thai, Principal Traffic Engineer City of Anaheim, 714-765-5294 jthai@anaheim.net 401 E. Chapman Ave. Placentia, CA 92870 200 S. Anaheim Blvd, Suite 276 Anaheim, CA 92805 Gabrielle Hayes, Senior Civil Engineer City of Orange, 714-744-5561 ghayes@cityoforange.org 300 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866 Pauline Nguyen, Branch Chief, Traffic Signals/Ramp Metering/ Census Caltrans District 12, 949-279-9168 6681 Marine Way Irvine, CA 92618 1     City Council 18 – 6 4/1/2025 SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP k. Signalized intersections that are part of the project: Main Corridor 1 Kraemer Boulevard 2 Kraemer Boulevard 3 Kraemer Boulevard 4 Kraemer Boulevard 5 Kraemer Boulevard 6 Kraemer Boulevard 7 Kraemer Boulevard 8 Kraemer Boulevard 9 Kraemer Boulevard 10 Kraemer Boulevard 11 Kraemer Boulevard 12 Kraemer Boulevard 13 Kraemer Boulevard 14 Kraemer Boulevard 15 Kraemer Boulevard 16 Kraemer Boulevard 17 Kraemer Boulevard 18 Kraemer Boulevard 19 Kraemer Boulevard 20 Kraemer Boulevard 21 Kraemer Boulevard 22 Kraemer Boulevard 23 Kraemer Boulevard 24 Kraemer Boulevard 25 Glassell Street Cross Street Main Corridor Cross Street SR-22 Westbound Ramp * SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * Fairhaven Avenue Santa Clara Avenue 21st Street Lambert Road 40 Glassell Street 41 Glassell Street 42 Grand Avenue 43 Grand Avenue 44 Grand Avenue 45 Grand Avenue 46 Grand Avenue 47 Grand Avenue 48 Grand Avenue 49 Grand Avenue 50 Grand Avenue 51 Grand Avenue 52 Grand Avenue 53 Grand Avenue 54 Grand Avenue 55 Grand Avenue 56 Grand Avenue 57 Grand Avenue 58 Grand Avenue 59 Grand Avenue 60 Grand Avenue 61 Grand Avenue Birch Street Orbiter Street Birch Hills Mall Imperial Highway (SR-90) * Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street Golden Avenue 17th Street I-5 Northbound Ramp Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp Fruit Street Patrician Lane Bastanchury Road Yorba Linda Boulevard Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue Madison Avenue OC Register 4th Street 1st Street Alta Vista Street Chestnut Avenue Chapman Avenue (North) Hawaii Way McFadden Avenue Century High School Edinger AvenueCrowther Avenue Orangethorpe Avenue La Jolla Street St Andrew Place St Gertrude Place Warner AvenueMiraloma Avenue Coronado Street Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp Dyer Road Fire Signal La Palma Avenue SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp * Frontera Street Riverdale Avenue Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue Lincoln Avenue 26 Glassell Street 27 Glassell Street 28 Glassell Street Fletcher Avenue 29 Glassell Street Meats Avenue 30 Glassell Street Grove Avenue 31 Glassell Street Orange Olive Road Taft Avenue32 Glassell Street 33 Glassell Street Katella Avenue 34 Glassell Street Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue Collins Avenue Legend 35 Glassell Street Brea 36 Glassell Street Walnut Avenue Placentia Anaheim Orange 37 Glassell Street Sycamore Avenue/University Drive Palm Avenue38 Glassell Street 39 Glassell Street La Veta Avenue Santa Ana * Caltrans l. Offset signalized intersections that are part of the project: Main Street Cross Street 1 Taft Avenue Shaffer Street Main Street Cross Street 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 Fairhaven Avenue Cambridge Street 3 Santa Ana Boulevard I-5 SB On/Off Ramp 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2     City Council 18 – 7 4/1/2025 SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP m. Project Map Depicting the Project Limits and Offset Signals 3     City Council 18 – 8 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 2: REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE Explain why this project is regionally significant: The Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor is a reinvigorated project originally performed and funded by M2 RTSSP in FY 2013/2014. The Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor extends 15.14 miles from Lambert Road in the City of Brea to Dyer Road in the City of Santa Ana. The corridor encompasses 61 signalized intersections controlled by the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, Orange, Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans is a participating agency in the project and the participating Cities are committed to executing a cooperative agreement with Caltrans for the implementation of optimized signal timing at the Caltrans intersections. Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor is currently classified as a Major Arterial in the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim and Santa Ana and as a Primary Arterial in the City of Orange. The corridor is also designated as part of a Priority Corridor Network by the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan. The corridor carries traffic volumes ranging from 13,000 to 21,000 in Cities of Brea and Placentia; up to approximately 46,000 in City of Anaheim, down to approximately 8,000 in Old Towne Orange, to over 40,000 vehicles daily in Santa Ana. Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor stretches from the northern County limits to the center of Orange County encompassing a wide range of land uses. At the northern limit in City of Brea, the arterial primarily serves a mix of residential, retail and large commercial including Birch Hills Mall and biomedical manufacturing company Beckman Coulter. This area experiences high morning and evening peak traffic volumes that require a well-synchronized network to meet the peak demand. In City of Placentia, the corridor primarily serves residential, small retail and schools including Tri-City Park and nearby Valencia High School. This area experiences moderately high morning and evening peak traffic volumes and requires a well balanced traffic signal system that serves both daily vehicle commuters and local pedestrian and bike users. In City of Anaheim, the corridor primarily serves large industrial and commercial businesses and cuts through the Anaheim Canyon Business District. This area is being reimagined by the City of Anaheim and looks to create a business environment attractive to a wide variety of industries while encouraging sustainable development. This area sees the highest traffic volume of the corridor and is adjacent to the Caltrans SR-91 Freeway which requires a well sychronized traffic signal system that accounts for high volume of vehicle and large trucks traffic. In the City of Orange, the corridor serves a mix of residential, small business, schools and historic landmarks including Chapman University and Old Towne Orange. This area experiences lower traffic volume but requires special signal timing and active transportation elements to efficiently accommodate the mix of vehicle, pedestrians and bicycles. At the southern limit in City of Santa Ana, the corridor serves a mix of residential, schools, and large manufacturing and commercial businesses including Behr Paint Company and several Orange County government facilities. This area sees some of the highest traffic volumes and demands a well-synchronized network to meet the directional and oversaturated traffic demand. The original signal timing and improvements on Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor has decayed and needs to be revisited. Therefore, it is imperative that this very important corridor be considered for the 2024 Call for Projects from OCTA. 4     City Council 18 – 9 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS a.PROJECT TASKS By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to the following tasks: Primary Implementation (PI) Phase, lasting approximately one year shall include the following: Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase This task is ongoing throughout the duration of the PI Phase of the project. It includes day-to-day project management, such as meetings, progress reports, tracking of schedules, tracking of cost by agency, invoicing, and overall administration of the PROJECT. The following list is a minimum of what is required of this task: •A running record of project cost broken down by Participating Agency shall be part of this task. This information will be used by the Lead Agency to bill Participating Agencies for their respective project match. •A running record of all scope changes and/or any deviations from the final approved application. This information will be used by the Lead Agency to request for Scope Changes at the Semi-Annual Review (SAR). Task 2: Data Collection and Field Review All agencies on this application will opt out of the Data Collection portion of Task 2 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. A Before/After study will be completed. However, Data Collection will be be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections and utilized to develop Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation. These efforts will be closely coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Data Collection efforts. Funding for Data Collection at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 2. This task shall include collecting seven-day, 24-hour machine counts, including vehicle and bike classifications, along each 1-mile segment of the corridor(s). The project shall also produce weekday and weekend peak period intersection turning movement (ITM) counts at every signalized intersection, including pedestrian and bicycle counts. ITM counts shall be conducted for two hours of each weekday peak period (AM, mid-day, and PM) and a single four-hour Saturday mid-day peak period. All counts shall be summarized in Microsoft Excel format. All data shall adhere to the CTFP Guidelines for data compatibility. Data collection also includes field review of before and after conditions. The floating car method shall be utilized with software and GPS for the ’Before’ Study to fine-tune the corridor operation and verify integrity of system intersection clocks. Synchronized Video shall be used to compare actual conditions to anticipated conditions dictated by the time-space diagram so that any anomalies may be corrected prior to the ’After’ studies task. Field review conducted as part of this task will document the existing conditions for all signal timing, infrastructure, and system improvements on the project. This includes pre-construction pictures for comparison during the post-construction walkthrough, should there be any questions or discrepancies noted by any parties. Data Collection and Field Review Memos shall be provided to all participating agencies. x to indicate all agencies on this application will opt out of the data collection portion of Task 2 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. A Before/After study is still required. A memorandum shall be submitted to indicate completion of this task. 5     City Council 18 – 10 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS Task 3: System Design and Construction The Lead Agency will hire a consultant(s), licensed contractor(s), and/or use city staff, or extension of staff, to design, procure, install, construct, and implement all desired components of the project as described in this application in accordance with the CTFP Guidelines. All work and equipment supplied for the project shall comply and be done in accordance with the latest standards and provisions of each Participating Agency or latest approved California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Standard Plans and Standard Specifications. As-built plans shall be provided to match the improvements. This task is not complete until all participating agencies approve the improvements implemented in their jurisdiction. Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation All agencies on this application will opt out of the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation portion of Task 4 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. However, Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation will be be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections and coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation efforts. Funding for Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 4. Synchronization will be inter-jurisdictional in nature. All existing traffic patterns, flows, and conditions will be taken into account. At a minimum, synchronized timing plans will be developed for a weekday AM, Mid-day, PM, and a Weekend peak period. Special generators such as schools and businesses along with cross street traffic will be considered as part of the project. Timing plans that will be developed will assist traffic in getting to its destination without regard to physical or jurisdictional boundaries. The following list is a minimum of what is required of this task: • • A review of the basic timing parameters Concept of Operations documenting the recommended coordination strategies (e.g. segments, cycle lengths, etc.) based on existing data collection and simulations Existing and Optimized simulation networks in Synchro (version 10) that is also shared with OCTA using the OCTA designated ID numbers Implementation and fine-tuning of proposed timing plans • • This task will not be complete until all participating agencies approve the new timing plans implemented. x to indicate all agencies on this application will opt out of the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation task (Task 4) due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. The Final PI Report shall still include a section on timing optimization and implementation from the Baseline Project. Task 5: Final PI Report A Final PI Report, with an executive summary, shall provide complete documentation of the project, including, but not limited to: • • Project scope, objectives, locations, findings, and recommendations Data collected: counts, travel time studies, and project benefits achieved in terms of fuel savings, travel time, and other measurable parameters •For each intersection: lane configurations, signal phasing, turning movement data, and cycle lengths for existing and proposed timings for all peak periods 6     City Council 18 – 11 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS • • • All work performed for system construction and signal timing optimization Implementation schedule and improvements accomplished, including dates Procedures for continuing maintenance, surveillance, and evaluation of the coordinated signal system The report shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the study corridor as well as recommendations based on PI tasks for further infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal coordination project results. The report shall be completed in accordance with the current CTFP Guidelines. Finally, the report shall provide recommendations with cost and benefit estimates for future improvements to traffic signal infrastructure (signal controllers, vehicle detection, communications, etc.), intersection capacity (appropriate signal phasing, lane geometrics, and alleviation of physical bottlenecks that curtail arterial capacity), and traffic management strategies. These proposed improvements should be useful in determining future enhancements to the corridor. A Project Summary Sheet, one sheet front and back, that describes the project and improvements gained shall be provided to OCTA. This sheet will be used by OCTA and Participating Agencies to present to the Board and elected officials. By checking this box, the following additional PI task(s) and/or exceptions will be made: All agencies on this application will opt out of the Data Collection portion of Task 2 and Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation portion of Task 4 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. However, Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation will be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections. These efforts will be closely coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization/ Implementation efforts. A Before/After study will be completed for the entire corridor including the Caltrans locations. No system construction is proposed at the Caltrans locations. Funding for Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization/ Implementation at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 2 and 4. ONGOING OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) PHASE, lasting approximately two (2) years, shall include the following: Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase This task includes day-to-day project management, such as meetings, tracking of schedules, invoicing, and overall administration of the project. This task shall continue in full force as specified in the Primary Implementation Phase. Task 7: Continuing Support During this 24-month period, the signal timing along the corridor/route/grid shall be observed and fine- tuned. This task shall also include the monitoring, maintaining, and repair of detection and communication implemented as part of this project. Monthly drives shall be conducted along the length of the project during all designated corridor synchronization timing plan hours of operation in order to verify that the synchronization timing is working as designed and complete any necessary adjustments. This is followed by a monthly memorandum summarizing the status and trends of the corridor based on the runs conducted. Trip logs for the month shall be provided to the Participating Agencies. The memorandum shall include all additional tasks requested and completed during that month. Performance metrics comparisons from ATSPM, where available, shall also be included in the memorandum. Task 8: Final O&M Report 7     City Council 18 – 12 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS At the end of the O&M Phase, a Final O&M Report documenting the Ongoing Operations and Maintenance efforts and procedures for continuing maintenance shall be prepared. At the minimum, the memorandum shall include when travel runs were conducted and issues and solutions throughout the phase. The memorandum shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the study corridor as well as recommendations for further infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal coordination project results. king this box, the following additional O&M task(s) and/or exceptions will be made: <Insert Text> b. c. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND OTHER PERMITS By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to obtain environmental clearance and other permits (if needed) for this project ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF MEETING CTFP GUIDELINES By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, certify that all current CTFP guidelines were met for this project. 8     City Council 18 – 13 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK a. Summary of Project Cost Project Tasks Total Cost Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Task 2: Data Collection $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 140,800.00 70,200.00 5,236,457.50 20,000.00 Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report 64,000.00 Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support 25,600.00 134,400.00 19,200.00Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum Total Project Cost: $5,710,657.50 Match Commitment:20%(minimum 20%) Total Project Cost (PI and O&M for a total of 3 years): Project Total Total M2 Request: $ Total Agency Match: $ Total Project Cost: $ 4,568,526.00 1,142,131.50 5,710,657.50 PI Total Total M2 Request for PI Phase: $ Total Agency Match for PI Phase: $ Total PI Cost: $ 4,425,166.00 1,106,291.50 5,531,457.50 O&M Total 143,360.00 35,840.00 179,200.00 Total M2 Request for O&M Phase: $ Total Agency Match for O&M Phase: $ Total O&M Cost: $ 8     City Council 18 – 14 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK b. Summary of Cost by Agency Brea Agency Caltrans 1 Offset Total 6Number of Signals:5 Project Tasks (Brea)Cost / Int Total Cost 13,200.00Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Task 2: Data Collection $ $ 2,200.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,200.00 - 7,200.00 549,200.00 5,000.00 Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report $ $ $ $ $ 5,000.00 1,000.00 400.00 2,100.00 300.00 6,000.00 Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support 2,400.00 12,600.00 1,800.00Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum M2 Requested Match Total Cost PI $ O&M $ 464,480.00 13,440.00 $ $ 116,120.00 3,360.00 $ $ 580,600.00 16,800.00 Placentia Number of Signals: Agency 11 Caltrans 0 Offset Total 11 Project Tasks (Placentia)Cost / Int Total Cost Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase $ $ 2,200.00 1,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 24,200.00 11,000.00 882,750.00 - Task 2: Data Collection Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report - $ $ $ $ $ - 1,000.00 400.00 11,000.00 4,400.00 23,100.00 3,300.00 Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support 2,100.00 300.00Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum M2 Requested Match Total Cost PI $ O&M $ 743,160.00 24,640.00 $ $ 185,790.00 6,160.00 $ $ 928,950.00 30,800.00 Anaheim Number of Signals: Agency 6 Caltrans 1 Offset Total 7 Project Tasks (Anaheim)Cost / Int Total Cost Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase $ $ 2,200.00 1,200.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 15,400.00 8,400.00 597,875.00 5,000.00 7,000.00 2,800.00 14,700.00 2,100.00 Task 2: Data Collection Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report - $ $ $ $ $ 5,000.00 1,000.00 400.00 2,100.00 300.00 Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum M2 Requested Match Total Cost PI $ O&M $ 506,940.00 15,680.00 $ $ 126,735.00 3,920.00 $ $ 633,675.00 19,600.00 9     City Council 18 – 15 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Orange Agency 15 Caltrans 2 Offset 1 Total 18Number of Signals: Project Tasks (Orange)Cost / Int Total Cost 39,600.00Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Task 2: Data Collection $ $ 2,200.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,200.00 - 21,600.00 1,454,250.00 10,000.00 18,000.00 7,200.00 Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report $ $ $ $ $ 5,000.00 1,000.00 400.00 2,100.00 300.00 Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support 37,800.00 5,400.00Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum M2 Requested Match Total Cost PI $ O&M $ 1,234,760.00 40,320.00 $ $ 308,690.00 10,080.00 $ $ 1,543,450.00 50,400.00 Santa Ana Number of Signals: Agency 20 Caltrans Offset 2 Total 22 Project Tasks (Santa Ana)Cost / Int Total Cost 48,400.00Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase $ $ 2,200.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Task 2: Data Collection 1,000.00 - 22,000.00 1,752,382.50 - Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report $ $ $ $ $ - 1,000.00 400.00 2,100.00 300.00 22,000.00 8,800.00 46,200.00 6,600.00 Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum M2 Requested Match Total Cost PI $ O&M $ 1,475,826.00 49,280.00 $ $ 368,956.50 12,320.00 $ $ 1,844,782.50 61,600.00 10     City Council 18 – 16 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs TASK 3 IMPROVEMENT TOTALS LOC.AGENCY PROJECT CROSS STREETS Average ScoreDesign 7,000.00 Construction TOTAL 96,250.001 Brea Lambert Road $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $89,250.00 89,250.00 76,500.00 127,500.00 2,500.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 31.3 31.3 31.7 31.3 50.0 31.3 27.5 31.3 35.0 32.5 15.0 22.5 32.0 31.3 15.0 15.0 26.7 31.0 32.5 31.3 45.0 33.0 50.0 32.5 27.0 27.0 36.7 36.7 31.7 31.7 2 Brea 3 Brea 4 Brea 5 Brea 6 Brea Birch Street 7,000.00 6,000.00 10,000.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 96,250.00 82,500.00 137,500.00 2,500.00 Orbiter Street Birch Hills Mall Imperial Highway (SR-90) * Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street Golden Avenue 7,000.00 6,200.00 7,200.00 9,400.00 2,800.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 11,400.00 6,800.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 6,200.00 6,850.00 7,850.00 5,850.00 1,550.00 6,450.00 - 89,250.00 79,050.00 91,800.00 119,850.00 35,700.00 12,750.00 25,500.00 145,350.00 86,700.00 12,750.00 12,750.00 79,050.00 87,337.50 100,087.50 74,587.50 19,762.50 82,237.50 2,500.00 96,250.00 85,250.00 99,000.00 129,250.00 38,500.00 13,750.00 27,500.00 156,750.00 93,500.00 13,750.00 13,750.00 85,250.00 94,187.50 107,937.50 80,437.50 21,312.50 88,687.50 2,500.00 7 Placentia 8 Placentia 9 Placentia 10 Placentia 11 Placentia 12 Placentia 13 Placentia 14 Placentia 15 Placentia 16 Placentia 17 Placentia 18 Anaheim 19 Anaheim 20 Anaheim 21 Anaheim 22 Anaheim 23 Anaheim 24 Anaheim 25 Orange Patrician Lane Bastanchury Road Yorba Linda Boulevard Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue Madison Avenue Alta Vista Street Chapman Avenue (North) Hawaii Way Crowther Avenue Orangethorpe Avenue La Jolla Street Miraloma Avenue Coronado Street Fire Signal La Palma Avenue SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp * Frontera Street 7,850.00 5,300.00 5,300.00 6,600.00 6,600.00 11,600.00 13,500.00 - 100,087.50 67,575.00 67,575.00 84,150.00 84,150.00 147,900.00 172,125.00 - 107,937.50 72,875.00 72,875.00 90,750.00 90,750.00 159,500.00 185,625.00 - Riverdale Avenue 26 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue $ 27 Orange Lincoln Avenue $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 28 Orange Fletcher Avenue 29 Orange Meats Avenue 30 Orange Grove Avenue 31 Orange Orange Olive Road Taft Avenue32 Orange 2,600.00 1,900.00 2,600.00 2,600.00 6,600.00 6,600.00 6,600.00 7,700.00 - 33,150.00 24,225.00 33,150.00 33,150.00 84,150.00 84,150.00 84,150.00 98,175.00 2,500.00 35,750.00 26,125.00 35,750.00 35,750.00 90,750.00 90,750.00 90,750.00 105,875.00 2,500.00 40.0 30.0 40.0 40.0 36.7 36.7 40.0 35.0 50.0 50.0 32.9 35.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 33.8 30.0 40.0 40.0 33 Orange Katella Avenue 34 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue Collins Avenue35 Orange 36 Orange Walnut Avenue 37 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive Palm Avenue38 Orange 39 Orange La Veta Avenue 40 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp * SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * Fairhaven Avenue Santa Clara Avenue 21st Street 41 Orange -2,500.00 2,500.00 42 Santa Ana 43 Santa Ana 44 Santa Ana 45 Santa Ana 46 Santa Ana 47 Santa Ana 48 Santa Ana 49 Santa Ana 50 Santa Ana 16,200.00 2,700.00 8,900.00 8,900.00 2,700.00 4,000.00 8,700.00 2,100.00 7,800.00 208,447.50 36,322.50 115,372.50 115,372.50 36,322.50 52,897.50 112,822.50 28,672.50 101,347.50 224,647.50 39,022.50 124,272.50 124,272.50 39,022.50 56,897.50 121,522.50 30,772.50 109,147.50 17th Street I-5 Northbound Ramp Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ram $ Fruit Street OC Register 4th Street $ $ $ 11     City Council 18 – 17 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs TASK 3 IMPROVEMENT TOTALS LOC.AGENCY PROJECT CROSS STREETS Average ScoreDesign 8,100.00 Construction TOTAL 51 Santa Ana 1st Street $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $103,275.00 26,122.50 191,872.50 51,622.50 34,425.00 46,522.50 36,322.50 110,925.00 36,322.50 36,322.50 26,122.50 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 111,375.00 28,022.50 206,772.50 55,522.50 37,125.00 50,022.50 39,022.50 119,625.00 39,022.50 39,022.50 28,022.50 - 31.7 27.5 33.3 38.8 22.5 33.8 35.0 20.0 35.0 35.0 27.5 52 Santa Ana 53 Santa Ana 54 Santa Ana 55 Santa Ana 56 Santa Ana 57 Santa Ana 58 Santa Ana 59 Santa Ana 60 Santa Ana 61 Santa Ana - Chestnut Avenue McFadden Avenue Century High School Edinger Avenue 1,900.00 14,900.00 3,900.00 2,700.00 3,500.00 2,700.00 8,700.00 2,700.00 2,700.00 1,900.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ St Andrew Place St Gertrude Place Warner Avenue Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp Dyer Road -- 1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street 12,800.00 2,100.00 2,700.00 - 163,200.00 26,775.00 34,425.00 63,250.00 126,500.00 87,475.00 94,875.00 37,950.00 176,000.00 28,875.00 37,125.00 63,250.00 126,500.00 89,375.00 94,875.00 37,950.00 22.5 40.0 32.5 40.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 40.0 2 Santa Ana 3 Santa Ana Santa Ana Placentia Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Stre $ Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp $ - - - - - TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements $ $ $ $ $ - Orange 1,900.00 -Anaheim Brea - SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL = $ 5,236,457.50 33.6 12     City Council 18 – 18 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 5: DETAILED LOCAL MATCH COMMITMENT PART 1: AGENCY TOTAL MATCH SUMMARY CASH IN‐KIND TOTAL MATCHAgencyPIOMMPIOMMPI OMM $116,120.00 $3,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $116,120.00 $3,360.00 Brea $119,480.00 $185,790.00 $191,950.00 $126,735.00 $130,655.00 $308,690.00 $318,770.00 $338,956.50 $351,276.50 $1,076,291.50 $1,112,131.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $119,480.00 $6,160.00 $3,920.00 $10,080.00 $12,320.00 $35,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $185,790.00 $6,160.00 Placentia Anaheim Orange $191,950.00 $126,735.00 $3,920.00 $130,655.00 $0.00 $308,690.00 $10,080.00 $318,770.00 $30,000.00 $368,956.50 $12,320.00 Santa Ana $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $381,276.50 $1,106,291.50 $35,840.00 TOTAL MATCH $1,142,131.50 PART 2: MATCH BREAKDOWN (CASH vs IN-KIND SERVICES) Amount of Cash A. Cash Match Agency Funding Source Contribution Brea Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare Gas Tax/ AB2766 $119,480.00 Placentia Anaheim Orange $191,950.00 $130,655.00 $318,770.00 $351,276.50 $1,112,131.50 Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare M2 FairshareSanta Ana TOTAL CASH MATCH: B. In-Kind Services i. Specific Improvements (List items and Cost): Agency Description Expenditure Select a City Total Specific Improvements (i):$0.00 ii. Staffing Commitment: Fully Burdened Hourly Rate $170.00 Agency Staff Position Type of Service to Project No. of Hours Total* Sr. Civil Engineer Project Oversight, Construction Engineering 60 $10,200.00 Assistant Signal Operations Engineer Equipment configuration, installation and integration/ Construction Engineering 120 30 $140.00 $100.00 $16,800.00 Santa Ana Equipment configuration, installation and integration/ Construction EngineeringAssistant Engineer $3,000.00 $0.00 Total for City of Santa Ana:$30,000.00 $30,000.00Total Staffing Commitment (ii): TOTAL IN-KIND MATCH* (i + ii):$30,000.00 *Total amount is the required participation by the identified agency. The number of hours and hourly rate will be based on each agency’s actual fully burdened billing rates, which must collectively equal the same value of the assigned “Total” dollars. Each agency will be responsible for keeping detailed records of hours worked and description of work. An accounting record of personnel, hours at fully burdened rate shall be included with the in-kind report submittals. Records will be subject to auditing. In-kind match can be converted to Cash Match, but Cash Match cannot be converted to in-kind match. 13     City Council 18 – 19 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP SECTION 6: PROJECT SCHEDULE BY TASK a. Projected Start and End Dates: Project start date: Project end date: January 1, 2025 December 31, 2027 b. Projected Schedule by Task Task Starting Date January 1, 2025 January 1, 2025 January 1, 2025 January 1, 2025 October 1, 2025 January 1, 2026 January 1, 2026 October 1, 2027 Ending Date Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Task 2: Data Collection December 31, 2025 April 30, 2025 Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report December 31, 2025 December 31, 2025 December 31, 2025 December 31, 2027 December 31, 2027 December 31, 2027 Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum y checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to implement this project within 12 months. (This means the project will be ineligible for delays and timely use funds extensions. This is not applicable to projects requesting OCTA to lead and Baseline Project participants.) 14     City Council 18 – 20 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Appendix A CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATED POINTS     City Council 18 – 21 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATED POINTS Criteria (Max Points)Estimated Points 1. Transportation Significance (25 points) Yes, All agencies are participating in the Countywide Baseline Project Inclusion of offset signals w/in 2,700'25 # of offset signals on project / total # of offset signals :3 /115 =100.0% = = 10 15Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT):367,503 2. Economic Effectiveness (Cost to Benefit Ratio): (10 points)5 Calculation for Total Project Cost / VMT = $5,710,658 /367,503 =15.54 3. Project Characteristics: (20 points)10 Average project improvement score =33.6 4. Project Scale: (20 points) # of signals along entire length of corridor:61 61 =10 10 20 10 5 # of signals being synched / total # of corridor signals:/61 =100.0% = 5. Number of Jurisdictions: (10 points) 6 Participating Jurisdiction(s) 6. Current Project Status (10 points) Yes, Retiming 75% of previous project =5 Not Timing 75% of new eligible project Not Implementing within 12 months = = 0 0 7. Funding Match: (5 points)0 $1,142,131.50 /$5,710,657.50 =20.00% Total Estimated Points:75     City Council 18 – 22 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Appendix B AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS     City Council 18 – 23 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP TABLE I: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT PREFERENCES Yes No UNIT PRICE (MATERIAL + LABOR)APPLICABLE DESIGN COST PER UNIT VENDOR/BRAND & ADDITIONAL NOTES CATEGORIES ID ITEM DESCRIPTION Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana Encom Wireless Radio and Etherwan Ethernet Swich w/ SFPs Encom Radio, Fiber Switch & power supply, SFPs 1 Above ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)$19,000 $13,000 $1,900 $1,300 120 SMFO Fiber Optic Cable In Existing Conduit, Fiber Splicing (FDU and Splice Enclosure), Etherwan Switch w/ SFPs, Drop Cable, No 6E Pullbox 120 SMFO, conduit, Fiber Drop Cable, Splice enclosure, FPP/FDU, Fiber Switch, SFPs, Fiber Switch & power supply Fiber Optic Ethernet Switch w/ SFPs and Cable, Fiber Optic Ethernet Power Supply, Layer Switch w/ SFPs and Power 3 HUB Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply Reterminate Fiber Opitc Comm 2 Fiber Optic underground $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 $90,000 $19,000 $1,000 $1,000 $500 $9,000 $1,900 Ethernet SwitchSupply, Layer 3 HUB Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply Fiber Switch & power supply, SFPs, Fiber Patch Panel 3 4 All other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.) ATC signal controller $8,000 $7,000 $800 $700 Econolite 2070 TS2 Type 1 w/ 1C board w/ EOS software Qubic Commander w/ Econolite Cobalt w/ EOS Econolite Cobalt w/ ASC3 Software Econolite Cobalt w/ EOS Software$10,000 $40,000 $8,000 $24,000 $44,000 $5,500 $8,000 $1,000 $4,000 $800 $550 $800 Scout Software Software Modify/extend existing foundation or use exitsing foundation as is, Econolite TS Type II P Cabinet Type P44 Cubic Trafficware Cabinet Western Systems Type P+5 6 Signal cabinet on existing foundation Signal cabinet on new foundation $24,000 $38,000 $2,400 $4,400 $2,400 $3,800 Western Systems Type P+ Western Systems Type P+ w/ Service and SCE Design Fee Econolite ATCC w/ Service and SCE Design Fee $60,000 $6,000 7 8 9 BBS/USP (attached) BBS/UPS on existing foundation BBS/UPS on new foundation $11,000 $10,000 $1,100 $1,000 Myers / Clary Myers / Clary Axis Q6000 + PTZ Camera10 CCTV $10,000 $40,000 $10,000 $24,000 $11,000 $8,000 $1,000 $4,000 $1,000 $2,400 $1,100 $800 Bosch / COHU Axis Cohu Rise Axis 11 Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs + counts) 12 Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs)Field Elements Econolite Vision or Iteris Apex13 Vehicle detection + bicycle detection $40,000 $12,000 $50,000 $4,000 $1,200 $5,000 Iteris Next Iteris Next Iteris Next Econolite Gridsmart w/ mounting brackets14 Vehicle detection $40,000 $23,000 $4,000 $2,300 15 Bicycle detection Polara (iN2S APS System)16 Pedestrian detection (audible)$12,000 $1,200 Polara (iN2S APS System)Campbell APS 17 Pedestrian detection 18 Active transportation/pedestrian safety 19 Transit Signal Priority GTT Opticam GPS System20 EVP (hybrid or GPS)$15,000 $12,000 $10,000 $1,500 $1,200 $1,000 GPS EVP 21 EVP (infrared) 22 Speed feedback signs (existing post) 23 Speed feedback signs (new post) Software, Licensing and Server24 Signal Performance Monitoring $1,500 Centracs SPM 25 Channelization Minor Signal Op Improve 26 Signal phasing improvement Etherwan Layer 3 w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Digital Watchdog VMS Server/ Licensing, Dell Server (Video/ Traff Synchro Green Central System Licenses, Etherwan Layer 3 Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Dell Workstations (w/ monitors), Touchpanel, TMC Console; Switches Dell Server, Milestone VMS Licenses, Dell Workstations Econolite Centracs Software and Server27 Central System (server, licenses, workstations)$30,000 $100,000 $75,000 $50,000 $50,000 TMC/TOC Mgt), Dell Workstations, Synchro License, IPWorkstation Schematic, Server Rack 28 Display (video wall, VMS, etc.) 29 UPS for TMC $10,000 $1,000 Rack Mount UPS 30 Timing Only 31 Timing + Traffic Responsive (license only) 32 Timing + Peer-to-Peer (configuration only) 33 Timing + Traffic Adaptive (license only) Signal Timing Only Caltrans Cooperative Agreement and Data Collection Cooperative Agreement and Data Collection Cooperative Agreement34 Caltrans Cooperative Agreement $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 18     City Council 18 – 24 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS TABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROJECT CROSS STREETS Lambert Road Birch Street Orbiter Street 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 5 6 10 1 13 1 14 16 17 24 27 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Brea Brea Brea Brea Brea Brea Placentia Placentia Placentia 1 1 1 Birch Hills Mall 1 1 Imperial Highway (SR-90) * Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street Golden Avenue 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Patrician Lane 1 1 1 1Bastanchury Road Yorba Linda Boulevard Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue Madison Avenue Alta Vista Street Chapman Avenue (North) Hawaii Way Crowther Avenue Orangethorpe Avenue La Jolla Street Miraloma Avenue Coronado Street Fire Signal La Palma Avenue SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp * Frontera Street Riverdale Avenue Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue Lincoln Avenue Fletcher Avenue Meats Avenue Grove Avenue Orange Olive Road Taft Avenue 1 1 1 10 Placentia 11 Placentia 12 Placentia 13 Placentia 14 Placentia 15 Placentia 16 Placentia 17 Placentia 18 Anaheim 19 Anaheim 20 Anaheim 21 Anaheim 22 Anaheim 23 Anaheim 24 Anaheim 25 Orange 26 Orange 27 Orange 28 Orange 29 Orange 30 Orange 31 Orange 32 Orange 33 Orange 34 Orange 35 Orange 36 Orange 37 Orange 38 Orange 39 Orange 40 Orange 41 Orange 42 Santa Ana 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Katella Avenue Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue Collins Avenue Walnut Avenue Sycamore Avenue/University Drive Palm Avenue 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1La Veta Avenue 1 SR-22 Westbound Ramp * SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * Fairhaven Avenue 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19     City Council 18 – 25 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS TABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROJECT CROSS STREETS 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 13 14 16 17 24 27 34 43 Santa Ana 44 Santa Ana 45 Santa Ana 46 Santa Ana 47 Santa Ana 48 Santa Ana 49 Santa Ana 50 Santa Ana 51 Santa Ana 52 Santa Ana 53 Santa Ana 54 Santa Ana 55 Santa Ana 56 Santa Ana 57 Santa Ana 58 Santa Ana 59 Santa Ana 60 Santa Ana 61 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue 21st Street 17th Street I-5 Northbound Ramp Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp Fruit Street OC Register 4th Street 1st Street Chestnut Avenue McFadden Avenue Century High School Edinger Avenue St Andrew Place St Gertrude Place Warner Avenue Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp Dyer Road 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 2 3 - - - Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements 1 1 1 Santa Ana Santa Ana Santa Ana Placentia Orange 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Anaheim Brea QUANTITY TOTAL = 16 45 2 47 10 7 15 20 6 10 2 21 5 4 20     City Council 18 – 26 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS TABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS Construction Management & Inspection Contingency PROJECT CROSS STREETS Lambert Road Birch Street Orbiter Street Design 7,000.00 Construction 15%10%TOTAL 96,250.00 96,250.00 82,500.00 137,500.00 2,500.00 NOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Brea Brea Brea Brea Brea Brea Placentia Placentia Placentia $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $70,000.00 70,000.00 60,000.00 100,000.00 2,500.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,500.00 10,500.00 9,000.00 15,000.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,750.00 8,750.00 7,500.00 12,500.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,000.00 6,000.00 10,000.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Birch Hills Mall Imperial Highway (SR-90) * Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street Golden Avenue 7,000.00 6,200.00 7,200.00 9,400.00 2,800.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 11,400.00 6,800.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 6,200.00 6,850.00 7,850.00 5,850.00 1,550.00 6,450.00 - 70,000.00 62,000.00 72,000.00 94,000.00 28,000.00 10,000.00 20,000.00 114,000.00 68,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 62,000.00 68,500.00 78,500.00 58,500.00 15,500.00 64,500.00 2,500.00 10,500.00 9,300.00 10,800.00 14,100.00 4,200.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 17,100.00 10,200.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 9,300.00 10,275.00 11,775.00 8,775.00 2,325.00 9,675.00 - 8,750.00 7,750.00 9,000.00 11,750.00 3,500.00 1,250.00 2,500.00 14,250.00 8,500.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 7,750.00 8,562.50 9,812.50 7,312.50 1,937.50 8,062.50 - 96,250.00 85,250.00 99,000.00 129,250.00 38,500.00 13,750.00 27,500.00 156,750.00 93,500.00 13,750.00 13,750.00 85,250.00 94,187.50 107,937.50 80,437.50 21,312.50 88,687.50 2,500.00 107,937.50 72,875.00 72,875.00 90,750.00 90,750.00 159,500.00 185,625.00 - Patrician Lane Bastanchury Road Yorba Linda Boulevard Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue Madison Avenue Alta Vista Street Chapman Avenue (North) Hawaii Way Crowther Avenue Orangethorpe Avenue La Jolla Street Miraloma Avenue Coronado Street Fire Signal La Palma Avenue SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp * Frontera Street Riverdale Avenue Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue Lincoln Avenue Fletcher Avenue Meats Avenue Grove Avenue Orange Olive Road Taft Avenue 10 Placentia 11 Placentia 12 Placentia 13 Placentia 14 Placentia 15 Placentia 16 Placentia 17 Placentia 18 Anaheim 19 Anaheim 20 Anaheim 21 Anaheim 22 Anaheim 23 Anaheim 24 Anaheim 25 Orange 26 Orange 27 Orange 28 Orange 29 Orange 30 Orange 31 Orange 32 Orange 33 Orange 34 Orange 35 Orange 36 Orange 37 Orange 38 Orange 39 Orange 40 Orange 41 Orange 42 Santa Ana 7,850.00 5,300.00 5,300.00 6,600.00 6,600.00 11,600.00 13,500.00 - 78,500.00 53,000.00 53,000.00 66,000.00 66,000.00 116,000.00 135,000.00 - 11,775.00 7,950.00 7,950.00 9,900.00 9,900.00 17,400.00 20,250.00 - 9,812.50 6,625.00 6,625.00 8,250.00 8,250.00 14,500.00 16,875.00 - 2,600.00 1,900.00 2,600.00 2,600.00 6,600.00 6,600.00 6,600.00 7,700.00 - 26,000.00 19,000.00 26,000.00 26,000.00 66,000.00 66,000.00 66,000.00 77,000.00 2,500.00 3,900.00 2,850.00 3,900.00 3,900.00 9,900.00 9,900.00 9,900.00 11,550.00 - 3,250.00 2,375.00 3,250.00 3,250.00 8,250.00 8,250.00 8,250.00 9,625.00 - 35,750.00 26,125.00 35,750.00 35,750.00 90,750.00 90,750.00 90,750.00 105,875.00 2,500.00 Katella Avenue Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue Collins Avenue Walnut Avenue Sycamore Avenue/University Drive Palm Avenue La Veta Avenue SR-22 Westbound Ramp * SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * Fairhaven Avenue -2,500.00 --2,500.00 224,647.5016,200.00 163,500.00 24,525.00 20,422.50 21     City Council 18 – 27 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS TABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS Construction Management & Inspection Contingency PROJECT CROSS STREETS Santa Clara Avenue 21st Street Design 2,700.00 Construction 15%10%TOTAL NOTES 43 Santa Ana 44 Santa Ana 45 Santa Ana 46 Santa Ana 47 Santa Ana 48 Santa Ana 49 Santa Ana 50 Santa Ana 51 Santa Ana 52 Santa Ana 53 Santa Ana 54 Santa Ana 55 Santa Ana 56 Santa Ana 57 Santa Ana 58 Santa Ana 59 Santa Ana 60 Santa Ana 61 Santa Ana $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $28,500.00 90,500.00 90,500.00 28,500.00 41,500.00 88,500.00 22,500.00 79,500.00 81,000.00 20,500.00 150,500.00 40,500.00 27,000.00 36,500.00 28,500.00 87,000.00 28,500.00 28,500.00 20,500.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,275.00 13,575.00 13,575.00 4,275.00 6,225.00 13,275.00 3,375.00 11,925.00 12,150.00 3,075.00 22,575.00 6,075.00 4,050.00 5,475.00 4,275.00 13,050.00 4,275.00 4,275.00 3,075.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,547.50 11,297.50 11,297.50 3,547.50 5,172.50 11,047.50 2,797.50 9,922.50 10,125.00 2,547.50 18,797.50 5,047.50 3,375.00 4,547.50 3,547.50 10,875.00 3,547.50 3,547.50 2,547.50 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 39,022.50 8,900.00 8,900.00 2,700.00 4,000.00 8,700.00 2,100.00 7,800.00 8,100.00 1,900.00 14,900.00 3,900.00 2,700.00 3,500.00 2,700.00 8,700.00 2,700.00 2,700.00 1,900.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 124,272.50 124,272.50 39,022.50 56,897.50 121,522.50 30,772.50 109,147.50 111,375.00 28,022.50 206,772.50 55,522.50 37,125.00 50,022.50 39,022.50 119,625.00 39,022.50 39,022.50 28,022.50 - 176,000.00 28,875.00 37,125.00 63,250.00 126,500.00 89,375.00 94,875.00 37,950.00 17th Street I-5 Northbound Ramp Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp Fruit Street OC Register 4th Street 1st Street Chestnut Avenue McFadden Avenue Century High School Edinger Avenue St Andrew Place St Gertrude Place Warner Avenue Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp Dyer Road - 1 2 3 - - - Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements TMC Improvements 12,800.00 2,100.00 2,700.00 - 128,000.00 21,000.00 27,000.00 50,000.00 100,000.00 69,000.00 75,000.00 30,000.00 19,200.00 3,150.00 4,050.00 7,500.00 15,000.00 10,350.00 11,250.00 4,500.00 16,000.00 2,625.00 3,375.00 5,750.00 11,500.00 8,125.00 8,625.00 3,450.00 Santa Ana Santa Ana Santa Ana Placentia Orange - 1,900.00 -- - Anaheim Brea - QUANTITY TOTAL =SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL =$5,236,457.50 22     City Council 18 – 28 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP TABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROJECT CROSS STREETS Time Source None/5+ Years or Within 5 Years 0/5+ or <5 0/10+ or < 10 1 Brea Lambert Road 15 15 15 15 50 50 50 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 2 Brea Birch Street 3 Brea Orbiter Street 4 Brea Birch Hills Mall 30 30 5 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) * Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street Golden Avenue 6 Brea 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 50 50 30 30 30 7 Placentia 8 Placentia 9 Placentia 10 Placentia 11 Placentia 12 Placentia 13 Placentia 14 Placentia 15 Placentia 16 Placentia 17 Placentia 18 Anaheim 19 Anaheim 20 Anaheim 21 Anaheim 22 Anaheim 23 Anaheim 24 Anaheim 25 Orange 26 Orange 27 Orange 28 Orange 29 Orange 30 Orange 31 Orange 32 Orange 33 Orange 34 Orange 35 Orange 36 Orange 37 Orange 38 Orange 39 Orange 40 Orange 41 Orange 42 Santa Ana 15 30 30 Patrician Lane 30 30 50 50Bastanchury Road Yorba Linda Boulevard Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue Madison Avenue 50 50 30 Alta Vista Street 50 50 15 15 30 30 50 Chapman Avenue (North) Hawaii Way Crowther Avenue Orangethorpe Avenue La Jolla Street 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Miraloma Avenue Coronado Street 40 Fire Signal 40 40La Palma Avenue SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp * Frontera Street 15 15 30 30 30 3050 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 30 30 40 Riverdale Avenue Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue Lincoln Avenue 1 1 30 30 30Fletcher Avenue 30 30Meats Avenue 15 15Grove Avenue 30 Orange Olive Road Taft Avenue 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 Katella Avenue Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue Collins Avenue 50 50 50 50 50 50 Walnut Avenue 30 30 30 30 Sycamore Avenue/University Drive Palm Avenue 50 50 La Veta Avenue 30 SR-22 Westbound Ramp * SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * Fairhaven Avenue 30 15 50 15 30 40 23     City Council 18 – 29 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP TABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROJECT CROSS STREETS Time Source None/5+ Years or Within 5 Years 0/5+ or <5 0/10+ or < 10 43 Santa Ana 44 Santa Ana 45 Santa Ana 46 Santa Ana 47 Santa Ana 48 Santa Ana 49 Santa Ana 50 Santa Ana 51 Santa Ana 52 Santa Ana 53 Santa Ana 54 Santa Ana 55 Santa Ana 56 Santa Ana 57 Santa Ana 58 Santa Ana 59 Santa Ana 60 Santa Ana 61 Santa Ana 0 Santa Clara Avenue 21st Street 15 15 15 15 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 30 30 50 5017th Street I-5 Northbound Ramp Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp Fruit Street 30 15 15 15 15 15 OC Register 30 4th Street 30 30 30 50 501st Street 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Chestnut Avenue McFadden Avenue Century High School Edinger Avenue 40 40 40 50 50 30 50 50 30 30St Andrew Place St Gertrude Place Warner Avenue 50 50 40 40 30 Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp Dyer Road 50 50 40 40 40 0 - 1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp TMC Improvements 15 15 30 2 Santa Ana 3 Santa Ana Santa Ana 30 30 50 50 - - - - - 40 Placentia TMC Improvements 40 40 40 40 Orange TMC Improvements Anaheim TMC Improvements Brea TMC Improvements 24     City Council 18 – 30 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP TABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES PROJECT CROSS STREETS Online or Offline Y/N NOTES 1 Brea Lambert Road 31.3 31.3 31.7 31.3 50.0 31.3 27.5 31.3 35.0 32.5 15.0 22.5 32.0 31.3 15.0 15.0 26.7 31.0 32.5 31.3 45.0 33.0 50.0 32.5 27.0 27.0 36.7 36.7 31.7 31.7 2 Brea Birch Street 3 Brea Orbiter Street 4 Brea Birch Hills Mall 5 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) * Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street Golden Avenue 50 6 Brea 7 Placentia 8 Placentia 9 Placentia 10 Placentia 11 Placentia 12 Placentia 13 Placentia 14 Placentia 15 Placentia 16 Placentia 17 Placentia 18 Anaheim 19 Anaheim 20 Anaheim 21 Anaheim 22 Anaheim 23 Anaheim 24 Anaheim 25 Orange 26 Orange 27 Orange 28 Orange 29 Orange 30 Orange 31 Orange 32 Orange 33 Orange 34 Orange 35 Orange 36 Orange 37 Orange 38 Orange 39 Orange 40 Orange 41 Orange 42 Santa Ana Patrician Lane Bastanchury Road Yorba Linda Boulevard Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue Madison Avenue Alta Vista Street Chapman Avenue (North) Hawaii Way Crowther Avenue Orangethorpe Avenue La Jolla Street Miraloma Avenue Coronado Street Fire Signal La Palma Avenue SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp * Frontera Street 50 Riverdale Avenue Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue Lincoln Avenue Fletcher Avenue Meats Avenue Grove Avenue Orange Olive Road Taft Avenue 40.0 30.0 40.0 40.0 36.7 36.7 40.0 35.0 50.0 50.0 32.9 Katella Avenue Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue Collins Avenue Walnut Avenue Sycamore Avenue/University Drive Palm Avenue La Veta Avenue SR-22 Westbound Ramp * SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * Fairhaven Avenue 50 50 25     City Council 18 – 31 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP TABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES PROJECT CROSS STREETS Online or Offline Y/N NOTES 43 Santa Ana 44 Santa Ana 45 Santa Ana 46 Santa Ana 47 Santa Ana 48 Santa Ana 49 Santa Ana 50 Santa Ana 51 Santa Ana 52 Santa Ana 53 Santa Ana 54 Santa Ana 55 Santa Ana 56 Santa Ana 57 Santa Ana 58 Santa Ana 59 Santa Ana 60 Santa Ana 61 Santa Ana 0 Santa Clara Avenue 21st Street 35.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 33.8 30.0 40.0 40.0 31.7 27.5 33.3 38.8 22.5 33.8 35.0 20.0 35.0 35.0 27.5 17th Street I-5 Northbound Ramp Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp Fruit Street OC Register 4th Street 1st Street Chestnut Avenue McFadden Avenue Century High School Edinger Avenue St Andrew Place St Gertrude Place Warner Avenue Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp Dyer Road 0 - 1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp TMC Improvements 22.5 40.0 32.5 40.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 40.0 2 Santa Ana 3 Santa Ana Santa Ana- - - - - Placentia TMC Improvements Orange TMC Improvements Anaheim TMC Improvements Brea TMC Improvements AVERAGE SCORE =33.6 26     City Council 18 – 32 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Appendix C VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)     City Council 18 – 33 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP APPENDIX C: VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) Segment Lambert Rd - Birch St ADTs 13,036 16,463 16,397 16,052 18,362 20,952 18,905 18,932 45,665 20,900 16,200 16,500 21,900 15,500 8,900 Distance 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.80 0.40 0.42 1.70 0.45 0.46 0.94 0.46 0.46 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.34 0.16 0.43 0.50 0.39 0.61 0.84 0.48 0.75 VMT 5,214 8,232 8,199 8,026 11,017 16,762 7,562 7,951 77,631 9,405 7,452 15,510 10,074 7,130 4,450 3,950 6,600 9,894 4,688 11,886 12,199 11,205 27,305 31,136 13,593 18,483 Birch St - Imperial Hwy (SR-90) Imperial Hwy (SR-90) - Golden Ave Golden Ave - Bastanchury Rd Bastanchury Rd - Yorba Linda Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd - Alta Vista St Alta Vista St - Chapman Ave (North) Chapman Ave (North) - Orangethorpe Ave Anaheim Orangethorpe Ave - Riverdale Ave Riverdale Ave - Lincoln Ave Lincoln Ave - Fletcher Ave Fletcher Ave - Taft Ave Taft Ave - Katella Ave Katella Ave - Collins Ave Collins Ave - Walnut Ave Walnut Ave - Chapman Ave (South) Chapman Ave (South) - La Veta Ave La Veta Ave - SR-22 Fwy 7,900 13,200 29,100 29,300 27,641 24,397 28,732 44,763 37,067 28,319 24,644 SR-22 Fwy - Fairhaven Ave Fairhaven Ave - Santa Clara Ave Santa Clara Ave - 17th St 17th St - Santa Ana Blvd/ I-5 Fwy I-5 Fwy - 1st St 1st St - McFadden Ave McFadden Ave - Edinger Ave Edinger Ave - Warner Ave Warner Ave - Dyer Rd 21,727 0.55 11,950 Total Project VMT:15.14 367,503 Source: 2023 - Brea, Placentia, Anaheim 2022 - Santa Ana, Orange     City Council 18 – 34 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Appendix D AGENCY RESOLUTIONS AND LETTERS OF SUPPORT     City Council 18 – 35 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Appendix E Cabinet photos and As-built drawings (Uploaded to OCFundTracker and included in Electronic Submittal Only)     City Council 18 – 36 4/1/2025 ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS SCORE BASED ON STATUS Signal Timing (No Capital)Online Offline Timing Only 50 30 Timing + Traffic Responsive (license only) Timing + Peer-to-Peer (configuration only) Timing + Traffic Adaptive (license only) Signal Communication 50 50 40 15 40 1 No Time Source Time Source Above ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.) Fiber Optic underground 50 25 30 15 All other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.) Field Elements 5 1 None/5+ Years Within 5 Years ATC signal controller 50 10 Signal cabinet on existing foundation Signal cabinet on new foundation BBS/USP (attached) 30 15 20 10 5 10 BBS/UPS on existing foundation BBS/UPS on new foundation CCTV 10 5 30 5 1 10 Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs + counts) Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs) Vehicle detection + bicycle detection Vehicle detection 50 40 30 30 30 20 15 15 Bicycle detection 30 15 Pedestrian detection (audible) Pedestrian detection 50 30 30 15 Active transportation/pedestrian safety Transit Signal Priority 50 50 30 25 EVP (hybrid or GPS)40 10 EVP (infrared)30 10 Speed feedback signs (existing post) Speed feedback signs (new post) Signal Performance Monitoring Minor Signal Operational Improvements Channelization 40 20 40 10 10 10 None/5+ Years Within 5 Years 40 50 20 25Signal phasing improvement TMC/TOC None/10+ Years Within 10 Years Central System (server, licenses, workstations) Display (video wall, VMS, etc.) UPS for TMC Caltrans Participation Caltrans Cooperative Agreement 40 30 20 20 10 5 Without Coop 25 With Coop 50     City Council 18 – 37 4/1/2025 1 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITIES OF SANTA ANA, BREA, PLACENTIA, ANAHEIM, AND ORANGE FOR THE KRAEMER BOULEVARD/ GLASSELL STREET/ GRAND AVENUE CORRIDOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT This Cooperative Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this day of , 2025, by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city (“SANTA ANA”), the CITY OF BREA, a municipal corporation (“BREA”), the CITY OF PLACENTIA, a municipal corporation (“PLACENTIA”), the CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation (“ANAHEIM”), and the CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation (“ORANGE”). RECITALS: A. Santa Ana, with cooperation from Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, applied for a grant from the Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”) as part of Renewed Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (“RTSSP”)(Project P), aimed to coordinate traffic signals across multiple jurisdictions to enhance countywide traffic flow and reduce congestion. B. The Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor Traffic Signal Synchronization Project was selected by OCTA as one of the RTSSP Projects to be funded in OCTA Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The project will include timing implementation and improvements at traffic signals along Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue, from Lambert Road in Brea to Dyer Road in Santa Ana, as listed in the Project Application attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. C. The total budget for the project is $5,710,657.50. 80% ($4,568,526) is funded by the OCTA Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and 20% ($1,142,131.50) is local agencies matching funds. The breakdown is shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. D. Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange agree to provide twenty percent (20%) matching funds for the total project cost. Matching funds can be a combination of cash and in-kind match as defined by the RTSSP grant. E.OCTA and Santa Ana have entered into a Master Funding Agreement “Cooperative Agreement No. C-1-2783” defining the terms and conditions for approved Measure M2 projects that will be implemented by Santa Ana. F. Santa Ana agrees to serve as the lead agency to oversee the design and implementation of the project. G. Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange desire to enter into this Cooperative Agreement to demonstrate their commitment to implement the project and improve inter- jurisdiction traffic signal synchronization on Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue. (;+,%,72     City Council 18 – 38 4/1/2025 2 H. This cooperative agreement defines the specific terms, conditions and funding responsibilities between Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the implementation of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed by and between SANTA ANA, BREA, PLACENTIA, ANAHEIM, and ORANGE as follows: I. SCOPE: This Agreement specifies the roles and responsibilities of the cities as they pertain to the subjects and projects addressed herein. The project is specifically detailed in the Project Application attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. All of the cities agree that each will cooperate and coordinate with the other in all activities covered by this Agreement and any other supplemental agreements that may be required to facilitate purposes thereof. II. MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES: Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange mutually agree to: a. Designate a lead staff to act as the liaison for the project. The liaison and any other project personnel, if necessary, will attend and participate in all related project meetings. b. Participate, cooperate and coordinate with contractors, consultants, vendors and staff in good faith using reasonable efforts to resolve any unforeseen issues and disputes arising out of the project to the extent practicable with respect to the performance of the project. c. Maintain project related traffic signals and telecommunications equipment with high priority during the project, and be responsible for repair of their own signal control systems in each of their respective jurisdictions. d. Provide on-site support for signal control systems, timing plans, detection systems and related equipment during construction, installation and integration, and be available to change or make adjustments to timing plans when necessitated by the project. e. Document in-kind match or dollar match funding as identified in the project application, and provide verification of such expenditures as part of any review or audit process, which may include payroll records, contracts and purchase orders. f. Monitor and operate the project traffic signals and improvements within its jurisdiction for a period of two (2) years following the completion of the Primary Implementation Phase of the project, as required by the program funding. g. Coordinate the inclusion of other improvements and in-kind services, where necessary, that the owning agency requires for the implementation of the project, but are not included in the project application. The owning agency shall be responsible for the inclusion of such elements within reason and at its own costs. h. Unused project funds for improvements from one City can be used by another City (with matching fund responsibility) upon mutual consent of the involved parties.     City Council 18 – 39 4/1/2025 3 III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF SANTA ANA: Santa Ana agrees to the following responsibilities: a. Santa Ana shall serve as lead agency for design, construction and construction management of the project, and shall provide oversight by establishing milestones and overseeing the project development to ensure that all standards and requirements set forth by the agreement is adhered to. b. Santa Ana shall be responsible for completing the project in accordance with the funding guidelines and any and all other OCTA requirements related to these funding programs. Santa Ana shall maintain coordination with all participating agencies throughout the duration of the project. c. Santa Ana shall provide staff, consultants, and contractors deemed necessary and appropriate to manage, administer, coordinate, and oversee timing implementation, engineering design, bid and award, and construction management of the project. d. Santa Ana shall enter into an agreement with a qualified consultant and contractor to assist in the completion and monitoring of the project. e. Santa Ana shall enter into any required Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans regarding Caltrans Improvements in cities; to comply with all the terms and conditions of said Cooperative Agreement; to pay invoices for such Caltrans Improvements as required by Caltrans; and to invoice participating agencies in a timely manner with detailed documentation of said Caltrans Improvements f. Santa Ana shall coordinate the work effort of this Project, provide the day to day management of the consultant and manage all consultant administration and contracting. Santa Ana shall review the consultant’s invoices and pay them accordingly after ensuring that the work has been adequately performed by the consultant. g. Santa Ana shall provide its share of matching fund as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application. h. Upon issuance of a Notice to Proceed to the Consultant, Santa Ana can issue invoices to Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for up to 80% of the cash match amount identified in Exhibit A. The remaining cash match amount will be invoiced after completion of the Primary Implementation Phase of the project. i. Santa Ana shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Agreement with OCTA, including the Project Reporting and Audit Requirements contained therein. IV. RESPONSIBILITIES OF BREA, Brea agrees to the following responsibilities:     City Council 18 – 40 4/1/2025 4 a. Brea shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application. b. Brea shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction. No additional compensation from the project is provided for providing inspection services. c. Brea shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction. V. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PLACENTIA: Placentia agrees to the following responsibilities: a. Placentia shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application. b. Placentia shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction. No additional compensation from the project is provided for providing inspection services. c. Placentia shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction. VI. RESPONSIBILITIES OF ANAHEIM: Anaheim agrees to the following responsibilities: a. Anaheim shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application. b. Anaheim shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction. No additional compensation from the project is provided for providing inspection services. c. Anaheim shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction. VII. RESPONSIBILITIES OF ORANGE: Orange agrees to the following responsibilities: a. Orange shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application. b. Orange shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction. No additional compensation from the project is provided for providing inspection services.     City Council 18 – 41 4/1/2025 5 c. Orange shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction. VIII. COMPLETE AGREEMENT: a. This Agreement, including any attachments incorporated herein and made applicable by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement between SANTA ANA, BREA, PLACENTIA, ANAHEIM, and ORANGE and it supersedes all prior representations, understandings and communications between the parties. The invalidity in whole or in part of any term or condition of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of other term(s) or conditions(s) of this Agreement. The above referenced Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein. b. Any modification of this Agreement shall only be by amendment upon written mutual consent of all cities. All modifications, amendments, changes and revisions of this Agreement in whole or in part, and from time to time, shall be binding upon the cities so long as the same shall be in writing and executed by each agency. c. A party’s failure to insist on any instance(s) of any other party’s performance of any term(s) or condition(s) of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the non-enforcing party’s right to such performance or to future performance of such term(s) or condition(s), and the nonperforming party’s obligation in respect thereto shall continue in full force and effect. Changes to any portion of this Agreement shall not be binding upon either party except when specifically confirmed in writing by way of a written amendment to this Agreement between the parties and issued in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. IX. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION: a. Each city shall jointly and severally indemnify, defend and hold harmless every other city, it’s officers, directors, employees and agents from and against any and all claims for any loss or damages, bodily injuries, damage to, or loss of property caused by the negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct by that city, its officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of the performance of this Agreement. b. Each city shall maintain adequate levels of insurance, or self-insurance to assure full indemnification of every other city. X. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: a. Term of Agreement: This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2030. This Agreement may be extended at the mutual consent of all parties in writing. b. SANTA ANA, BREA, PLACENTIA, ANAHEIM, and ORANGE hereto affirm that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that, by so executing this agreement, the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. c. Severability: If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each term,     City Council 18 – 42 4/1/2025 6 provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d. Counterparts of Agreement: This Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute the same agreement. Facsimile and electronic signatures will be permitted. e. In the event that the project costs exceed the estimates submitted in the Project Application as prepared, all parties agree to meet and determine project revisions to meet the budget, or a revised funding proposal by the cities that shall be documented and submitted in writing as a revision to the Agreement. f. The parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, ordinances and regulations of any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the project. g. Force Majeure: Any party shall be excused from performing its obligations under this Agreement during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by an unforeseeable cause beyond its control, including, but not limited to: any incidence of fire, flood; acts of God; commandeering of material, products, plants or facilities by the federal, state or local government; national fuel shortage; or, a material act or omission by the other party; when satisfactory evidence of such cause is presented to the other parties, and provided further that such nonperformance is unforeseeable, beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the party not performing. h. Assignment: Neither this Agreement, nor any of the parties’ rights, obligations, or duties hereunder may be assigned in whole or in part by any party without the prior written consent of all the other parties in their sole and absolute discretion. Any such attempt of assignment shall be deemed void and of no force and effect. Consent to one assignment shall not be deemed consent to any subsequent assignment, nor the waiver of any right to consent to such subsequent assignment. i. Obligations To Comply with Law: Nothing herein shall be deemed nor construed to authorize or require any party to issue bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness under the terms, in amounts, or for purposes other than as authorized by local, state or federal law. j. Governing Law: The laws of the State of California and applicable local and federal laws, regulations and guidelines shall govern this Agreement. k. Litigation fees: Should litigation arise out of this Agreement for the performance thereof, the court shall award costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, to the prevailing party. l. Notices: Any notices, requests, or demands made between the parties pursuant to this Agreement are to be directed as follows: City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43 Santa Ana, CA 92701     City Council 18 – 43 4/1/2025 7 Cesar Rodriguez Sr. Civil Engineer (714) 647-5626 Crodriguez5@santa-ana.org City of Brea Public Works Department 1 Civic Center Circle Brea, CA 92821 Ryan Chapman City Engineer 714-990-7763 ryanch@ci.brea.ca.us City of Placentia Public Works Department 401 E. Chapman Ave. Placentia, CA 92870 Kyra Tao Transportation Manager 714-993-8121 ktao@placentia.org City of Anaheim Public Works Department 200 S. Anaheim Blvd, Suite 276 Anaheim, CA 92805 John Thai Principal Traffic Engineer 714-765-5294 jthai@anaheim.net City of Orange Public Works Department 300 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866 Gabrielle Hayes Principal Civil Engineer 714-744-5561 ghayes@cityoforange.org XI. DELAGATED AUTHORITY: The actions required to be taken by the cities in the implementation of this Agreement are delegated to its City Manager or equivalent designee. [SIGNATURES ON SUBSEQUENT PAGES]     City Council 18 – 44 4/1/2025 Nabil Saba Digitally signed by Nabil Saba Date: 2025.03.17 11:42:10 -07'00'     City Council 18 – 45 4/1/2025     City Council 18 – 46 4/1/2025     City Council 18 – 47 4/1/2025     City Council 18 – 48 4/1/2025 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written: CITY OF ORANGE: Thomas C. Kisela City Manager ATTEST: Pamela Coleman City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mike Vigliotta City Attorney               City Council 18 – 49 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT A KRAEMER BOULEVARD/ GLASSELL STREET/ GRAND AVENUE CORRIDOR TSSP PROJECT FUNDS BREAKDOWN Agency Project Funds by Agency* M2 Grant (80%) Local Match (20%) Total Match** Match Type Cash In-kind 1 Brea PI $580,600 $464,480 $116,120 $116,120 $0 O&M $16,800 $13,440 $3,360 $3,360 $0 2 Placentia PI $928,950 $743,160 $185,790 $185,790 $0 O&M $30,800 $24,640 $6,160 $6,160 $0 3 Anaheim PI $633,675 $506,940 $126,735 $126,735 $0 O&M $19,600 $15,680 $3,920 $3,920 $0 4 Orange PI $1,543,450 $1,234,760 $308,690 $308,690 $0 O&M $50,400 $40,320 $10,080 $10,080 $0 5 Santa Ana PI $1,844,782.50 $1,475,826 $368,956.50 $338,956.50 $30,000 O&M $61,600 $49,280 $12,320 $12,320 $0 Total $5,710,657.50 $4,568,526 $1,142,131.50 $1,112,131.50 $30,000 *: Unused project funds from one Agency can be transferred to another Agency with mutual consent. **: Total match amount may vary; the final match amount will be based on the actual project implementation costs, to be determined at completion of the Primary Implementation Phase of the project.     City Council 18 – 50 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT B KRAEMER BOULEVARD/ GLASSELL STREET/ GRAND AVENUE CORRIDOR TSSP PROJECT APPLICATION     City Council 18 – 51 4/1/2025 15.1 61 Santa Ana Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Caltrans Applicant Agency:City of Contact Name: Contact Number: Contact Email: Application Deadline Project Overview Total Match: $5,710,657.50 $4,568,526.00 $1,142,131.50 Length of Corridor (mi): Number of signals: Total Project Cost: M2 funds requested: FY 2024 Call for Projects Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Project P Supplemental Application 10/26/2023 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor Santa Ana Cesar Rodriguez 714-647-54626 crodirguez5@santa-ana.org Cash Match: In-kind Match: Participating Agencies: $1,112,131.50 $30,000.00     City Council 18 – 52 4/1/2025 Project P Supplemental Application Checklist Page RTSSP Online Application – submitted through OCFundTracker a. Transportation Significance b. Economic Effectiveness c. Project Characteristics d. Project Scale e. Number of Jurisdictions f. Current Project Status g. Funding Match h. Cabinet photos, equipment specifications, as-built drawings, cabinet drawings, etc. Online only Section 1: Key Technical Information a. Name of Project Corridor/Grid/Route 1 b. Project Limits 1 c. Project Length 1 d. Number of Signalized Intersections Along Corridor 1 e. Participating Agencies/Traffic Forum Members 1 f. Lead Agency 1 g. Designation of the corridor to synchronize 1 h. Project Start and End Date 1 i. Previous funding 1 j. Contact Information 1 k. Signalized intersections that are part of the project 2 l. Offset signalized intersections that are part of the project 2 m. Project Map Depicting the Project Limits 3 Section 2: Regional Significance 4 Section 3: Acknowledgement of Required Tasks 5-8 Section 4: Funding Needs/Costs for Proposed Project by Task a. Summary of Project Cost 9 b. Summary of Cost by Agency 10-11 c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs 12-13 Section 5: Detailed Local Match Commitment 14 Section 6: Project Schedule by Task a. Project Start and End Dates 15 b. Project Schedule by Task 15 Appendices A. Calculations and Estimated Points B. Agency Improvement Calculations C. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) D. Agency Resolutions and Letters of Support E. Cabinet Photos and As-built drawings (Uploaded to OCFundTracker and included in Electronic Submittal Only) Online Project P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Table of Contents i     City Council 18 – 53 4/1/2025 SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP a. Project b. from to c.Project Length (miles ): d.Number of signalized intersections along the corridor (include all Caltrans intersections): number of signals on project corridor(s) number of offset signals included in this project e.Participating agencies / Traffic Forum Members (including applicant agency ): f. Lead Agency g. Designation of the corridor to synchronize: h. Project End Date: i. j. Contact Information (Include name, title, agency, phone, email, and address) John Thai, Principal Traffic Engineer City of Anaheim, 714-765-5294 jthai@anaheim.net 200 S. Anaheim Blvd, Suite 276 Anaheim, CA 92805 Gabrielle Hayes, Senior Civil Engineer City of Orange, 714-744-5561 ghayes@cityoforange.org 300 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866 Pauline Nguyen, Branch Chief, Traffic Signals/Ramp Metering/ Census Caltrans District 12, 949-279-9168 6681 Marine Way Irvine, CA 92618 Kyra Tao, Transportation Manager City of Placentia, 714-993-8121 ktao@placentia.org 401 E. Chapman Ave. Placentia, CA 92870 Cesar Rodriguez, Senior Civil Engineer City of Santa Ana, 714-647-5626 crodriguez5@santa-ana.org 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Albert Espinoza, City Engineer City of Brea, 714-990-7657 alberte@ci.brea.ca.us 1 Civic Center Circle Brea, CA 92821 Select any that apply: Corridor Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor 15.14 Project Limits: Santa Ana 361 Lambert Road Dyer Road December 31, 2027January 1, 2025Project Start Date: Signal Synchronization Network Corridor / Priority Corridor Master Plan of Arterial Highways Corridor Anaheim Buena Park Caltrans Costa Mesa Cypress Dana Point Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beach La Habra La Palma Laguna Beach Laguna Hills Mission Viejo Orange Placentia Rancho Santa Margarita San Clemente Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Westminster County of Orange Irvine Lake Forest San Juan Capistrano Yorba Linda Aliso Viejo Brea Laguna Niguel Laguna Woods Los Alamitos Re-timing at least 75% of previous project Timing at least 75% of new eligible project Newport Beach None All participating agencies are participating in the Countywide Baseline Project 1     City Council 18 – 54 4/1/2025 SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP k. Signalized intersections that are part of the project: 1 Kraemer Boulevard Lambert Road 40 Glassell Street SR-22 Westbound Ramp * 2 Kraemer Boulevard Birch Street 41 Glassell Street SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * 3 Kraemer Boulevard Orbiter Street 42 Grand Avenue Fairhaven Avenue 4 Kraemer Boulevard Birch Hills Mall 43 Grand Avenue Santa Clara Avenue 5 Kraemer Boulevard Imperial Highway (SR-90) * 44 Grand Avenue 21st Street 6 Kraemer Boulevard Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street 45 Grand Avenue 17th Street 7 Kraemer Boulevard Golden Avenue 46 Grand Avenue I-5 Northbound Ramp 8 Kraemer Boulevard Patrician Lane 47 Grand Avenue Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp 9 Kraemer Boulevard Bastanchury Road 48 Grand Avenue Fruit Street 10 Kraemer Boulevard Yorba Linda Boulevard 49 Grand Avenue OC Register 11 Kraemer Boulevard Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue 50 Grand Avenue 4th Street 12 Kraemer Boulevard Madison Avenue 51 Grand Avenue 1st Street 13 Kraemer Boulevard Alta Vista Street 52 Grand Avenue Chestnut Avenue 14 Kraemer Boulevard Chapman Avenue (North) 53 Grand Avenue McFadden Avenue 15 Kraemer Boulevard Hawaii Way 54 Grand Avenue Century High School 16 Kraemer Boulevard Crowther Avenue 55 Grand Avenue Edinger Avenue 17 Kraemer Boulevard Orangethorpe Avenue 56 Grand Avenue St Andrew Place 18 Kraemer Boulevard La Jolla Street 57 Grand Avenue St Gertrude Place 19 Kraemer Boulevard Miraloma Avenue 58 Grand Avenue Warner Avenue 20 Kraemer Boulevard Coronado Street 59 Grand Avenue Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr 21 Kraemer Boulevard Fire Signal 60 Grand Avenue SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp 22 Kraemer Boulevard La Palma Avenue 61 Grand Avenue Dyer Road 23 Kraemer Boulevard SR-91 Westbound Off -Ramp * 24 Kraemer Boulevard Frontera Street 25 Glassell Street Riverdale Avenue 26 Glassell Street Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue 27 Glassell Street Lincoln Avenue 28 Glassell Street Fletcher Avenue 29 Glassell Street Meats Avenue 30 Glassell Street Grove Avenue 31 Glassell Street Orange Olive Road 32 Glassell Street Taft Avenue 33 Glassell Street Katella Avenue 34 Glassell Street Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue Legend 35 Glassell Street Collins Avenue 36 Glassell Street Walnut Avenue 37 Glassell Street Sycamore Avenue/University Drive 38 Glassell Street Palm Avenue 39 Glassell Street La Veta Avenue *Caltrans l. Offset signalized intersections that are part of the project: 1 Taft Avenue 13 2 Fairhaven Avenue 14 3 Santa Ana Boulevard 15 4 16 5 17 6 18 7 19 8 20 9 10 11 12 Main Corridor Main Street Cross Street Main Street Brea Placentia Main Corridor Cross Street I-5 SB On/Off Ramp Anaheim Shaffer Street Cambridge Street Cross Street Santa Ana Orange Cross Street 2     City Council 18 – 55 4/1/2025 SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATIONKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPm. Project Map Depicting the Project Limits and Offset Signals3    City Council 18 – 56 4/1/2025 SECTION 2: REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Explain why this project is regionally significant: The Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor is a reinvigorated project originally performed and funded by M2 RTSSP in FY 2013/2014. The Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor extends 15.14 miles from Lambert Road in the City of Brea to Dyer Road in the City of Santa Ana. The corridor encompasses 61 signalized intersections controlled by the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, Orange, Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans is a participating agency in the project and the participating Cities are committed to executing a cooperative agreement with Caltrans for the implementation of optimized signal timing at the Caltrans intersections. Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor is currently classified as a Major Arterial in the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim and Santa Ana and as a Primary Arterial in the City of Orange. The corridor is also designated as part of a Priority Corridor Network by the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan. The corridor carries traffic volumes ranging from 13,000 to 21,000 in Cities of Brea and Placentia; up to approximately 46,000 in City of Anaheim, down to approximately 8,000 in Old Towne Orange, to over 40,000 vehicles daily in Santa Ana. Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor stretches from the northern County limits to the center of Orange County encompassing a wide range of land uses. At the northern limit in City of Brea, the arterial primarily serves a mix of residential, retail and large commercial including Birch Hills Mall and biomedical manufacturing company Beckman Coulter. This area experiences high morning and evening peak traffic volumes that require a well-synchronized network to meet the peak demand. In City of Placentia, the corridor primarily serves residential, small retail and schools including Tri-City Park and nearby Valencia High School. This area experiences moderately high morning and evening peak traffic volumes and requires a well balanced traffic signal system that serves both daily vehicle commuters and local pedestrian and bike users. In City of Anaheim, the corridor primarily serves large industrial and commercial businesses and cuts through the Anaheim Canyon Business District. This area is being reimagined by the City of Anaheim and looks to create a business environment attractive to a wide variety of industries while encouraging sustainable development. This area sees the highest traffic volume of the corridor and is adjacent to the Caltrans SR-91 Freeway which requires a well sychronized traffic signal system that accounts for high volume of vehicle and large trucks traffic. In the City of Orange, the corridor serves a mix of residential, small business, schools and historic landmarks including Chapman University and Old Towne Orange. This area experiences lower traffic volume but requires special signal timing and active transportation elements to efficiently accommodate the mix of vehicle, pedestrians and bicycles. At the southern limit in City of Santa Ana, the corridor serves a mix of residential, schools, and large manufacturing and commercial businesses including Behr Paint Company and several Orange County government facilities. This area sees some of the highest traffic volumes and demands a well-synchronized network to meet the directional and oversaturated traffic demand. The original signal timing and improvements on Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor has decayed and needs to be revisited. Therefore, it is imperative that this very important corridor be considered for the 2024 Call for Projects from OCTA. 4     City Council 18 – 57 4/1/2025 SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP a.PROJECT TASKS Primary Implementation (PI) Phase, lasting approximately one year shall include the following: Task 1: Task 2: By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to the following tasks: Project Management - PI Phase Data Collection and Field Review This task is ongoing throughout the duration of the PI Phase of the project. It includes day-to-day project management, such as meetings, progress reports, tracking of schedules, tracking of cost by agency, invoicing, and overall administration of the PROJECT. The following list is a minimum of what is required of this task: • A running record of project cost broken down by Participating Agency shall be part of this task. This information will be used by the Lead Agency to bill Participating Agencies for their respective project match. • A running record of all scope changes and/or any deviations from the final approved application. This information will be used by the Lead Agency to request for Scope Changes at the Semi-Annual Review (SAR). All agencies on this application will opt out of the Data Collection portion of Task 2 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. A Before/After study will be completed. However, Data Collection will be be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections and utilized to develop Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation. These efforts will be closely coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Data Collection efforts. Funding for Data Collection at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 2. This task shall include collecting seven-day, 24-hour machine counts, including vehicle and bike classifications, along each 1-mile segment of the corridor(s). The project shall also produce weekday and weekend peak period intersection turning movement (ITM) counts at every signalized intersection, including pedestrian and bicycle counts. ITM counts shall be conducted for two hours of each weekday peak period (AM, mid-day, and PM) and a single four-hour Saturday mid-day peak period. All counts shall be summarized in Microsoft Excel format. All data shall adhere to the CTFP Guidelines for data compatibility. Data collection also includes field review of before and after conditions. The floating car method shall be utilized with software and GPS for the ’Before’ Study to fine-tune the corridor operation and verify integrity of system intersection clocks. Synchronized Video shall be used to compare actual conditions to anticipated conditions dictated by the time-space diagram so that any anomalies may be corrected prior to the ’After’ studies task. Field review conducted as part of this task will document the existing conditions for all signal timing, infrastructure, and system improvements on the project. This includes pre-construction pictures for comparison during the post-construction walkthrough, should there be any questions or discrepancies noted by any parties. Data Collection and Field Review Memos shall be provided to all participating agencies. Check this box to indicate all agencies on this application will opt out of the data collection portion of Task 2 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. A Before/After study is still required. A memorandum shall be submitted to indicate completion of this task. 5     City Council 18 – 58 4/1/2025 SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Task 3: Task 4: Task 5: System Design and Construction Final PI Report Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Check this box to indicate all agencies on this application will opt out of the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation task (Task 4) due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. The Final PI Report shall still include a section on timing optimization and implementation from the Baseline Project. The Lead Agency will hire a consultant(s), licensed contractor(s), and/or use city staff, or extension of staff, to design, procure, install, construct, and implement all desired components of the project as described in this application in accordance with the CTFP Guidelines. All work and equipment supplied for the project shall comply and be done in accordance with the latest standards and provisions of each Participating Agency or latest approved California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Standard Plans and Standard Specifications. As-built plans shall be provided to match the improvements. This task is not complete until all participating agencies approve the improvements implemented in their jurisdiction. All agencies on this application will opt out of the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation portion of Task 4 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. However, Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation will be be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections and coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation efforts. Funding for Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 4. Synchronization will be inter-jurisdictional in nature. All existing traffic patterns, flows, and conditions will be taken into account. At a minimum, synchronized timing plans will be developed for a weekday AM, Mid-day, PM, and a Weekend peak period. Special generators such as schools and businesses along with cross street traffic will be considered as part of the project. Timing plans that will be developed will assist traffic in getting to its destination without regard to physical or jurisdictional boundaries. The following list is a minimum of what is required of this task: • A review of the basic timing parameters • Concept of Operations documenting the recommended coordination strategies (e.g. segments, cycle lengths, etc.) based on existing data collection and simulations • Existing and Optimized simulation networks in Synchro (version 10) that is also shared with OCTA using the OCTA designated ID numbers • Implementation and fine-tuning of proposed timing plans This task will not be complete until all participating agencies approve the new timing plans implemented. A Final PI Report, with an executive summary, shall provide complete documentation of the project, including, but not limited to: • Project scope, objectives, locations, findings, and recommendations • Data collected: counts, travel time studies, and project benefits achieved in terms of fuel savings, travel time, and other measurable parameters • For each intersection: lane configurations, signal phasing, turning movement data, and cycle lengths for existing and proposed timings for all peak periods 6     City Council 18 – 59 4/1/2025 SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP By checking this box, the following additional PI task(s) and/or exceptions will be made: Task 6: Task 7: Task 8: ONGOING OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) PHASE, lasting approximately two (2) years, shall include the following: Final O&M Report Continuing Support Project Management - O&M Phase During this 24-month period, the signal timing along the corridor/route/grid shall be observed and fine- tuned. This task shall also include the monitoring, maintaining, and repair of detection and communication implemented as part of this project. Monthly drives shall be conducted along the length of the project during all designated corridor synchronization timing plan hours of operation in order to verify that the synchronization timing is working as designed and complete any necessary adjustments. This is followed by a monthly memorandum summarizing the status and trends of the corridor based on the runs conducted. Trip logs for the month shall be provided to the Participating Agencies. The memorandum shall include all additional tasks requested and completed during that month. Performance metrics comparisons from ATSPM, where available, shall also be included in the memorandum. All agencies on this application will opt out of the Data Collection portion of Task 2 and Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation portion of Task 4 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. However, Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation will be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections. These efforts will be closely coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization/ Implementation efforts. A Before/After study will be completed for the entire corridor including the Caltrans locations. No system construction is proposed at the Caltrans locations. Funding for Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization/ Implementation at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 2 and 4. • All work performed for system construction and signal timing optimization • Implementation schedule and improvements accomplished, including dates • Procedures for continuing maintenance, surveillance, and evaluation of the coordinated signal system The report shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the study corridor as well as recommendations based on PI tasks for further infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal coordination project results. The report shall be completed in accordance with the current CTFP Guidelines. Finally, the report shall provide recommendations with cost and benefit estimates for future improvements to traffic signal infrastructure (signal controllers, vehicle detection, communications, etc.), intersection capacity (appropriate signal phasing, lane geometrics, and alleviation of physical bottlenecks that curtail arterial capacity), and traffic management strategies. These proposed improvements should be useful in determining future enhancements to the corridor. A Project Summary Sheet, one sheet front and back, that describes the project and improvements gained shall be provided to OCTA. This sheet will be used by OCTA and Participating Agencies to present to the Board and elected officials. This task includes day-to-day project management, such as meetings, tracking of schedules, invoicing, and overall administration of the project. This task shall continue in full force as specified in the Primary Implementation Phase. 7     City Council 18 – 60 4/1/2025 SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP By checking this box, the following additional O&M task(s) and/or exceptions will be made: b. c.ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF MEETING CTFP GUIDELINES <Insert Text> By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, certify that all current CTFP guidelines were met for this project. By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to obtain environmental clearance and other permits (if needed) for this project ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND OTHER PERMITS At the end of the O&M Phase, a Final O&M Report documenting the Ongoing Operations and Maintenance efforts and procedures for continuing maintenance shall be prepared. At the minimum, the memorandum shall include when travel runs were conducted and issues and solutions throughout the phase. The memorandum shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the study corridor as well as recommendations for further infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal coordination project results. 8     City Council 18 – 61 4/1/2025 SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP a. Summary of Project Cost Match Commitment: 20%(minimum 20%) Total Project Cost (PI and O&M for a total of 3 years): Total M2 Request: Total Agency Match: Total Project Cost: Total M2 Request for PI Phase: Total Agency Match for PI Phase: Total PI Cost: Total M2 Request for O&M Phase: Total Agency Match for O&M Phase: Total O&M Cost: Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 2: Data Collection Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Project Tasks Total Cost 5,710,657.50$ 19,200.00$ 134,400.00$ 25,600.00$ 64,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 5,236,457.50$ 70,200.00$ 140,800.00$ Total Project Cost: Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum Task 7: Continuing Support Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase 35,840.00$ 179,200.00$ Task 5: Project Report 4,568,526.00$ Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation PI Total 4,425,166.00$ 1,106,291.50$ Project Total 1,142,131.50$ 5,710,657.50$ 5,531,457.50$ O&M Total 143,360.00$ 8     City Council 18 – 62 4/1/2025 SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP b. Summary of Cost by Agency Agency Caltrans Offset Total 51 6 2,200.00$ 13,200.00$ 1,200.00$ 7,200.00$ - 549,200.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 400.00$ 2,400.00$ 2,100.00$ 12,600.00$ 300.00$ 1,800.00$ PI O&M Agency Caltrans Offset Total 11 0 11 2,200.00$ 24,200.00$ 1,000.00$ 11,000.00$ - 882,750.00$ -$ -$ 1,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 400.00$ 4,400.00$ 2,100.00$ 23,100.00$ 300.00$ 3,300.00$ PI O&M Agency Caltrans Offset Total 61 7 2,200.00$ 15,400.00$ 1,200.00$ 8,400.00$ - 597,875.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 400.00$ 2,800.00$ 2,100.00$ 14,700.00$ 300.00$ 2,100.00$ PI O&M 6,160.00$ 30,800.00$ Cost / Int Total Cost M2 Requested Match Total Cost 506,940.00$ 126,735.00$ Total Cost Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support Placentia Number of Signals: Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Cost / Int Brea Number of Signals: Task 5: Project Report Project Tasks (Brea) Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Task 2: Data Collection Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Task 2: Data Collection Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 7: Continuing Support Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum Task 2: Data Collection Task 3: System Design and Construction Total Cost Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase 24,640.00$ 3,360.00$ 116,120.00$ 13,440.00$ 464,480.00$ 743,160.00$ 580,600.00$ Project Tasks (Placentia) Cost / Int Total Cost Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum 185,790.00$ 928,950.00$ M2 Requested Match Total Cost 633,675.00$ 15,680.00$ 3,920.00$ 19,600.00$ MatchM2 Requested 16,800.00$ Anaheim Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum Number of Signals: Project Tasks (Anaheim) Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support 9     City Council 18 – 63 4/1/2025 SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Agency Caltrans Offset Total 15 2 1 18 2,200.00$ 39,600.00$ 1,200.00$ 21,600.00$ - 1,454,250.00$ 5,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 400.00$ 7,200.00$ 2,100.00$ 37,800.00$ 300.00$ 5,400.00$ PI O&M Agency Caltrans Offset Total 20 2 22 2,200.00$ 48,400.00$ 1,000.00$ 22,000.00$ - 1,752,382.50$ -$ -$ 1,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 400.00$ 8,800.00$ 2,100.00$ 46,200.00$ 300.00$ 6,600.00$ PI O&M 10,080.00$ M2 Requested Santa Ana Number of Signals: 12,320.00$ 61,600.00$ Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Task 2: Data Collection Task 3: System Design and Construction Cost / Int Total Cost Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report 368,956.50$ 1,234,760.00$ 308,690.00$ 1,543,450.00$ 40,320.00$ Project Tasks (Orange)Cost / Int Match Total Cost M2 Requested Match Total Cost Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum Total Cost Orange Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Project Tasks (Santa Ana) Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum 1,475,826.00$ 1,844,782.50$ 49,280.00$ 50,400.00$ Task 2: Data Collection Task 3: System Design and Construction Number of Signals: 10     City Council 18 – 64 4/1/2025 SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs Design Construction TOTAL Average Score 1 Brea Lambert Road 7,000.00$ 89,250.00$ 96,250.00$ 31.3 2 Brea Birch Street 7,000.00$ 89,250.00$ 96,250.00$ 31.3 3 Brea Orbiter Street 6,000.00$ 76,500.00$ 82,500.00$ 31.7 4 Brea Birch Hills Mall 10,000.00$ 127,500.00$ 137,500.00$ 31.3 5 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 6 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street 7,000.00$ 89,250.00$ 96,250.00$ 31.3 7 Placentia Golden Avenue 6,200.00$ 79,050.00$ 85,250.00$ 27.5 8 Placentia Patrician Lane 7,200.00$ 91,800.00$ 99,000.00$ 31.3 9 Placentia Bastanchury Road 9,400.00$ 119,850.00$ 129,250.00$ 35.0 10 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard 2,800.00$ 35,700.00$ 38,500.00$ 32.5 11 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue 1,000.00$ 12,750.00$ 13,750.00$ 15.0 12 Placentia Madison Avenue 2,000.00$ 25,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 22.5 13 Placentia Alta Vista Street 11,400.00$ 145,350.00$ 156,750.00$ 32.0 14 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North) 6,800.00$ 86,700.00$ 93,500.00$ 31.3 15 Placentia Hawaii Way 1,000.00$ 12,750.00$ 13,750.00$ 15.0 16 Placentia Crowther Avenue 1,000.00$ 12,750.00$ 13,750.00$ 15.0 17 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue 6,200.00$ 79,050.00$ 85,250.00$ 26.7 18 Anaheim La Jolla Street 6,850.00$ 87,337.50$ 94,187.50$ 31.0 19 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue 7,850.00$ 100,087.50$ 107,937.50$ 32.5 20 Anaheim Coronado Street 5,850.00$ 74,587.50$ 80,437.50$ 31.3 21 Anaheim Fire Signal 1,550.00$ 19,762.50$ 21,312.50$ 45.0 22 Anaheim La Palma Avenue 6,450.00$ 82,237.50$ 88,687.50$ 33.0 23 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off -Ramp * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 24 Anaheim Frontera Street 7,850.00$ 100,087.50$ 107,937.50$ 32.5 25 Orange Riverdale Avenue 5,300.00$ 67,575.00$ 72,875.00$ 27.0 26 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue 5,300.00$ 67,575.00$ 72,875.00$ 27.0 27 Orange Lincoln Avenue 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 36.7 28 Orange Fletcher Avenue 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 36.7 29 Orange Meats Avenue 11,600.00$ 147,900.00$ 159,500.00$ 31.7 30 Orange Grove Avenue 13,500.00$ 172,125.00$ 185,625.00$ 31.7 31 Orange Orange Olive Road -$ -$ -$ 32 Orange Taft Avenue 2,600.00$ 33,150.00$ 35,750.00$ 40.0 33 Orange Katella Avenue 1,900.00$ 24,225.00$ 26,125.00$ 30.0 34 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue 2,600.00$ 33,150.00$ 35,750.00$ 40.0 35 Orange Collins Avenue 2,600.00$ 33,150.00$ 35,750.00$ 40.0 36 Orange Walnut Avenue 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 36.7 37 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 36.7 38 Orange Palm Avenue 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 40.0 39 Orange La Veta Avenue 7,700.00$ 98,175.00$ 105,875.00$ 35.0 40 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 41 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 42 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue 16,200.00$ 208,447.50$ 224,647.50$ 32.9 43 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 44 Santa Ana 21st Street 8,900.00$ 115,372.50$ 124,272.50$ 37.0 45 Santa Ana 17th Street 8,900.00$ 115,372.50$ 124,272.50$ 37.0 46 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 47 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I -5 Southbound Ram 4,000.00$ 52,897.50$ 56,897.50$ 33.8 48 Santa Ana Fruit Street 8,700.00$ 112,822.50$ 121,522.50$ 30.0 49 Santa Ana OC Register 2,100.00$ 28,672.50$ 30,772.50$ 40.0 50 Santa Ana 4th Street 7,800.00$ 101,347.50$ 109,147.50$ 40.0 TASK 3 IMPROVEMENT TOTALS LOC.AGENCY PROJECT CROSS STREETS 11     City Council 18 – 65 4/1/2025 SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs Design Construction TOTAL Average Score TASK 3 IMPROVEMENT TOTALS LOC.AGENCY PROJECT CROSS STREETS 51 Santa Ana 1st Street 8,100.00$ 103,275.00$ 111,375.00$ 31.7 52 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue 1,900.00$ 26,122.50$ 28,022.50$ 27.5 53 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue 14,900.00$ 191,872.50$ 206,772.50$ 33.3 54 Santa Ana Century High School 3,900.00$ 51,622.50$ 55,522.50$ 38.8 55 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue 2,700.00$ 34,425.00$ 37,125.00$ 22.5 56 Santa Ana St Andrew Place 3,500.00$ 46,522.50$ 50,022.50$ 33.8 57 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 58 Santa Ana Warner Avenue 8,700.00$ 110,925.00$ 119,625.00$ 20.0 59 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 60 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off -Ramp 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 61 Santa Ana Dyer Road 1,900.00$ 26,122.50$ 28,022.50$ 27.5 -- - -$ -$ -$ 1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street 12,800.00$ 163,200.00$ 176,000.00$ 22.5 2 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Stre 2,100.00$ 26,775.00$ 28,875.00$ 40.0 3 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp 2,700.00$ 34,425.00$ 37,125.00$ 32.5 - Santa Ana TMC Improvements -$ 63,250.00$ 63,250.00$ 40.0 - Placentia TMC Improvements -$ 126,500.00$ 126,500.00$ 40.0 - Orange TMC Improvements 1,900.00$ 87,475.00$ 89,375.00$ 35.0 - Anaheim TMC Improvements -$ 94,875.00$ 94,875.00$ 40.0 - Brea TMC Improvements -$ 37,950.00$ 37,950.00$ 40.0 5,236,457.50$ 33.6SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL = 12     City Council 18 – 66 4/1/2025 SECTION 5: DETAILED LOCAL MATCH COMMITMENT Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP PI OMM PI OMM PI OMM $116,120.00 $3,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $116,120.00 $3,360.00 $185,790.00 $6,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $185,790.00 $6,160.00 $126,735.00 $3,920.00 $0.00 $0.00 $126,735.00 $3,920.00 $308,690.00 $10,080.00 $0.00 $0.00 $308,690.00 $10,080.00 $338,956.50 $12,320.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $368,956.50 $12,320.00 $1,076,291.50 $35,840.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $1,106,291.50 $35,840.00 A. Cash Match Agency Funding Source Amount of Cash Contribution Brea Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare $119,480.00 Placentia Gas Tax/ AB2766 $191,950.00 Anaheim Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare $130,655.00 Orange Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare $318,770.00 Santa Ana M2 Fairshare $351,276.50 $1,112,131.50 B. In-Kind Services i. Specific Improvements (List items and Cost): Agency Expenditure Select a City $0.00 ii. Staffing Commitment: Agency Staff Position No. of Hours Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Total* Sr. Civil Engineer 60 $170.00 $10,200.00 Assistant Signal Operations Engineer 120 $140.00 $16,800.00 Assistant Engineer 30 $100.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Description $1,142,131.50 $30,000.00 TOTAL CASH MATCH: TOTAL MATCH $1,112,131.50 Type of Service to Project Project Oversight, Construction Engineering Total Specific Improvements (i): *Total amount is the required participation by the identified agency. The number of hours and hourly rate will be based on each agency’s actual fully burdened billing rates, which must collectively equal the same value of the assigned “Total” dollars. Each agency will be responsible for keeping detailed records of hours worked and description of work. An accounting record of personnel, hours at fully burdened rate shall be included with the in-kind report submittals. Records will be subject to auditing. In-kind match can be converted to Cash Match, but Cash Match cannot be converted to in-kind match. Total for City of Santa Ana: TOTAL IN-KIND MATCH* (i + ii): Total Staffing Commitment (ii): Anaheim $130,655.00 Orange $318,770.00 $0.00 $0.00 $318,770.00 Santa Ana $351,276.50 $30,000.00 $381,276.50 PART 1: AGENCY TOTAL MATCH SUMMARY PART 2: MATCH BREAKDOWN (CASH vs IN-KIND SERVICES) Agency Placentia $191,950.00 $0.00 CASH Brea $119,480.00 TOTALMATCH $119,480.00 $191,950.00 $130,655.00 $0.00 INͲKIND Equipment configuration, installation and integration/ Construction Engineering Santa Ana Equipment configuration, installation and integration/ Construction Engineering 13     City Council 18 – 67 4/1/2025 SECTION 6: PROJECT SCHEDULE BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP a.Projected Start and End Dates: January 1, 2025 December 31, 2027 b.Projected Schedule by Task Starting Date Ending Date January 1, 2025 December 31, 2025 January 1, 2025 April 30, 2025 January 1, 2025 December 31, 2025 January 1, 2025 December 31, 2025 October 1, 2025 December 31, 2025 January 1, 2026 December 31, 2027 January 1, 2026 December 31, 2027 October 1, 2027 December 31, 2027 By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to implement this project within 12 months. (This means the project will be ineligible for delays and timely use funds extensions. This is not applicable to projects requesting OCTA to lead and Baseline Project participants.) Project start date: Project end date: Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum Task Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase Task 2: Data Collection Task 3: System Design and Construction Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation Task 5: Project Report Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase Task 7: Continuing Support 14     City Council 18 – 68 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATED POINTS Appendix A     City Council 18 – 69 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Estimated Points Yes, 3 /115 = =10 =15 /= = 61 =10 61 /61 = =10 6 Yes,=5 Not =0 Not Implementing within 12 months = 0 /= 75 APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATED POINTS Total Estimated Points: Calculation for Total Project Cost / VMT = Participating Jurisdiction(s) # of signals along entire length of corridor : # of signals being synched / total # of corridor signals: 5. Number of Jurisdictions: (10 points) 6. Current Project Status (10 points) 4. Project Scale: (20 points) $5,710,658 100.0% $5,710,657.50 0 20.00%$1,142,131.50 7. Funding Match: (5 points) Retiming 75% of previous project 25 10 5 1. Transportation Significance (25 points) Inclusion of offset signals w/in 2,700' Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): 367,503 10 5 20 Average project improvement score 33.6 Timing 75% of new eligible project All agencies are participating in the Countywide Baseline Project Criteria (Max Points) # of offset signals on project / total # of offset signals : 100.0% 2. Economic Effectiveness (Cost to Benefit Ratio): (10 points) 3. Project Characteristics: (20 points) 367,503 15.54     City Council 18 – 70 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Appendix B AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS     City Council 18 – 71 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE I: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT PREFERENCESBrea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana1 Above ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)$19,000 $13,000$1,900 $1,300Encom Radio, Fiber Switch & power supply, SFPsEncom Wireless Radio and Etherwan Ethernet Swich w/ SFPs2 Fiber Optic underground $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 $90,000 $19,000 $1,000 $1,000 $500 $9,000 $1,900Fiber Optic Ethernet Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Layer 3 HUB Switch w/ SFPs and Power SupplyReterminate Fiber Opitc Cable, Fiber Optic Ethernet Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Layer 3 HUB Switch w/ SFPs and Power SupplyEthernet Switch120 SMFO, conduit, Fiber Drop Cable, Splice enclosure, FPP/FDU, Fiber Switch, SFPs, Fiber Switch & power supply120 SMFO Fiber Optic Cable In Existing Conduit, Fiber Splicing (FDU and Splice Enclosure), Etherwan Switch w/ SFPs, Drop Cable, No 6E Pullbox 3 All other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)$8,000$800Fiber Switch & power supply, SFPs, Fiber Patch Panel 4 ATC signal controller $10,000 $8,000 $5,500 $7,000 $8,000 $1,000 $800 $550 $700 $800Qubic Commander w/ Scout SoftwareEconolite Cobalt w/ EOS SoftwareEconolite 2070 TS2 Type 1 w/ 1C board w/ EOS softwareEconolite Cobalt w/ ASC3 SoftwareEconolite Cobalt w/ EOS Software5 Signal cabinet on existing foundation $40,000 $24,000 $24,000 $38,000 $4,000 $2,400 $2,400 $3,800Type P44 Cubic Trafficware Cabinet Western Systems Type P+Western Systems Type P+Modify/extend existing foundation or use exitsing foundation as is, Econolite TS Type II P Cabinet6 Signal cabinet on new foundation $44,000 $60,000 $4,400 $6,000Western Systems Type P+ w/ Service and SCE Design FeeEconolite ATCC w/ Service and SCE Design Fee7 BBS/USP (attached)8 BBS/UPS on existing foundation$11,000$1,100Myers / Clary9 BBS/UPS on new foundationMyers / Clary10 CCTV $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $11,000 $8,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,100 $800Axis Q6000 + PTZ CameraBosch / COHU Axis Cohu Rise Axis 11 Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs + counts)12 Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs)13 Vehicle detection + bicycle detection $40,000 $40,000 $24,000 $50,000 $4,000 $4,000 $2,400 $5,000Iteris Next Iteris Next EconoliteEconolite Vision or Iteris Apex14 Vehicle detection$40,000$4,000Iteris Next Gridsmart w/ mounting brackets15 Bicycle detection16 Pedestrian detection (audible) $12,000 $23,000 $12,000 $1,200 $2,300 $1,200Polara (iN2S APS System) Campbell APSPolara (iN2S APS System)17 Pedestrian detection18 Active transportation/pedestrian safety19 Transit Signal Priority20 EVP (hybrid or GPS)$15,000 $12,000 $1,500 $1,200GTT Opticam GPS SystemGPS EVP21 EVP (infrared)22 Speed feedback signs (existing post)23 Speed feedback signs (new post)24 Signal Performance Monitoring $10,000 $1,500 $1,000Software, Licensing and ServerCentracs SPM25 Channelization26 Signal phasing improvement27 Central System (server, licenses, workstations) $30,000 $100,000 $75,000 $50,000 $50,000Synchro Green Central System Licenses, Etherwan Layer 3 Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Dell WorkstationEtherwan Layer 3 w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Digital Watchdog VMS Server/ Licensing, Dell Server (Video/ Traff Mgt), Dell Workstations, Synchro License, IP Schematic, Server RackEconolite Centracs Software and ServerWorkstations (w/ monitors), Touchpanel, TMC Console; SwitchesDell Server, Milestone VMS Licenses, Dell Workstations28 Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)29 UPS for TMC $10,000$1,000Rack Mount UPS30 Timing Only31 Timing + Traffic Responsive (license only)32 Timing + Peer-to-Peer (configuration only)33 Timing + Traffic Adaptive (license only)Caltrans34 Caltrans Cooperative Agreement $2,500 $2,500 $2,500Cooperative Agreement and Data CollectionCooperative Agreement and Data CollectionCooperative AgreementUNIT PRICE (MATERIAL + LABOR) APPLICABLE DESIGN COST PER UNIT VENDOR/BRAND & ADDITIONAL NOTESITEM DESCRIPTIONIDSignal Timing OnlyTMC/TOCCATEGORIESCommField ElementsMinor Signal Op ImproveYesNo18    City Council 18 – 72 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTIONAbove ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)Fiber Optic undergroundAll other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)ATC signal controllerSignal cabinet on existing foundationSignal cabinet on new foundationCCTVVehicle detection + bicycle detectionVehicle detectionPedestrian detection (audible)Pedestrian detectionSignal Performance MonitoringCentral System (server, licenses, workstations)Caltrans Cooperative Agreement12345610131416172427341 Brea Lambert Road11 112 Brea Birch Street11 113 Brea Orbiter Street11 14 Brea Birch Hills Mall111 15 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) *16 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street11 117 Placentia Golden Avenue111 18 Placentia Patrician Lane11119 Placentia Bastanchury Road111 1110 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard2111 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue112 Placentia Madison Avenue1113 Placentia Alta Vista Street1111114 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North)21 1 115 Placentia Hawaii Way116 Placentia Crowther Avenue117 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue11118 Anaheim La Jolla Street1111119 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue11111 120 Anaheim Coronado Street111 121 Anaheim Fire Signal1122 Anaheim La Palma Avenue11 21 123 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp *124 Anaheim Frontera Street11111 125 Orange Riverdale Avenue11126 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue11127 Orange Lincoln Avenue11 128 Orange Fletcher Avenue11 129 Orange Meats Avenue11 130 Orange Grove Avenue11131 Orange Orange Olive Road32 Orange Taft Avenue1133 Orange Katella Avenue134 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue1135 Orange Collins Avenue1136 Orange Walnut Avenue11 137 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive11 138 Orange Palm Avenue11 139 Orange La Veta Avenue111140 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp *141 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp *142 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue1111111LOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSDESCRIPTION OF WORK19    City Council 18 – 73 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTIONAbove ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)Fiber Optic undergroundAll other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)ATC signal controllerSignal cabinet on existing foundationSignal cabinet on new foundationCCTVVehicle detection + bicycle detectionVehicle detectionPedestrian detection (audible)Pedestrian detectionSignal Performance MonitoringCentral System (server, licenses, workstations)Caltrans Cooperative Agreement1234561013141617242734LOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSDESCRIPTION OF WORK43 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue11 144 Santa Ana 21st Street11 11145 Santa Ana 17th Street11 11146 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp11 147 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp11 1 148 Santa Ana Fruit Street111 149 Santa Ana OC Register11 150 Santa Ana 4th Street1 111151 Santa Ana 1st Street11152 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue1153 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue11111154 Santa Ana Century High School11 1155 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue1156 Santa Ana St Andrew Place11 1 157 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place11 158 Santa Ana Warner Avenue11159 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr11 160 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp11 161 Santa Ana Dyer Road11-1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street112 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street113 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp11- Santa Ana TMC Improvements1- Placentia TMC Improvements1- Orange TMC Improvements11- Anaheim TMC Improvements1- Brea TMC Improvements1164524710715206102215 4QUANTITY TOTAL = 20    City Council 18 – 74 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION1 Brea Lambert Road2 Brea Birch Street3 Brea Orbiter Street4 Brea Birch Hills Mall5 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) *6 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street7 Placentia Golden Avenue8 Placentia Patrician Lane9 Placentia Bastanchury Road10 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard11 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue12 Placentia Madison Avenue13 Placentia Alta Vista Street14 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North)15 Placentia Hawaii Way16 Placentia Crowther Avenue17 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue18 Anaheim La Jolla Street19 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue20 Anaheim Coronado Street21 Anaheim Fire Signal22 Anaheim La Palma Avenue23 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp *24 Anaheim Frontera Street25 Orange Riverdale Avenue26 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue27 Orange Lincoln Avenue28 Orange Fletcher Avenue29 Orange Meats Avenue30 Orange Grove Avenue31 Orange Orange Olive Road32 Orange Taft Avenue33 Orange Katella Avenue34 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue35 Orange Collins Avenue36 Orange Walnut Avenue37 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive38 Orange Palm Avenue39 Orange La Veta Avenue40 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp *41 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp *42 Santa Ana Fairhaven AvenueLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSConstruction Management & Inspection Contingency15% 10%7,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 10,500.00$ 8,750.00$ 96,250.00$ 7,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 10,500.00$ 8,750.00$ 96,250.00$ 6,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 82,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 12,500.00$ 137,500.00$ -$ 2,500.00$ -$ -$ 2,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 10,500.00$ 8,750.00$ 96,250.00$ 6,200.00$ 62,000.00$ 9,300.00$ 7,750.00$ 85,250.00$ 7,200.00$ 72,000.00$ 10,800.00$ 9,000.00$ 99,000.00$ 9,400.00$ 94,000.00$ 14,100.00$ 11,750.00$ 129,250.00$ 2,800.00$ 28,000.00$ 4,200.00$ 3,500.00$ 38,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,250.00$ 13,750.00$ 2,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 11,400.00$ 114,000.00$ 17,100.00$ 14,250.00$ 156,750.00$ 6,800.00$ 68,000.00$ 10,200.00$ 8,500.00$ 93,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,250.00$ 13,750.00$ 1,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,250.00$ 13,750.00$ 6,200.00$ 62,000.00$ 9,300.00$ 7,750.00$ 85,250.00$ 6,850.00$ 68,500.00$ 10,275.00$ 8,562.50$ 94,187.50$ 7,850.00$ 78,500.00$ 11,775.00$ 9,812.50$ 107,937.50$ 5,850.00$ 58,500.00$ 8,775.00$ 7,312.50$ 80,437.50$ 1,550.00$ 15,500.00$ 2,325.00$ 1,937.50$ 21,312.50$ 6,450.00$ 64,500.00$ 9,675.00$ 8,062.50$ 88,687.50$ -$ 2,500.00$ -$ -$ 2,500.00$ 7,850.00$ 78,500.00$ 11,775.00$ 9,812.50$ 107,937.50$ 5,300.00$ 53,000.00$ 7,950.00$ 6,625.00$ 72,875.00$ 5,300.00$ 53,000.00$ 7,950.00$ 6,625.00$ 72,875.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 11,600.00$ 116,000.00$ 17,400.00$ 14,500.00$ 159,500.00$ 13,500.00$ 135,000.00$ 20,250.00$ 16,875.00$ 185,625.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,600.00$ 26,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,250.00$ 35,750.00$ 1,900.00$ 19,000.00$ 2,850.00$ 2,375.00$ 26,125.00$ 2,600.00$ 26,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,250.00$ 35,750.00$ 2,600.00$ 26,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,250.00$ 35,750.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 7,700.00$ 77,000.00$ 11,550.00$ 9,625.00$ 105,875.00$ -$ 2,500.00$ -$ -$ 2,500.00$ -$ 2,500.00$ -$ -$ 2,500.00$ 16,200.00$ 163,500.00$ 24,525.00$ 20,422.50$ 224,647.50$ NOTESDesign Construction TOTALSIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS21    City Council 18 – 75 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTIONLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS43 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue44 Santa Ana 21st Street45 Santa Ana 17th Street46 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp47 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp48 Santa Ana Fruit Street49 Santa Ana OC Register50 Santa Ana 4th Street51 Santa Ana 1st Street52 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue53 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue54 Santa Ana Century High School55 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue56 Santa Ana St Andrew Place57 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place58 Santa Ana Warner Avenue59 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr60 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp61 Santa Ana Dyer Road-1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street2 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street3 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp- Santa Ana TMC Improvements- Placentia TMC Improvements- Orange TMC Improvements- Anaheim TMC Improvements- Brea TMC ImprovementsQUANTITY TOTAL = Construction Management & Inspection Contingency15% 10%NOTESDesign Construction TOTALSIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 8,900.00$ 90,500.00$ 13,575.00$ 11,297.50$ 124,272.50$ 8,900.00$ 90,500.00$ 13,575.00$ 11,297.50$ 124,272.50$ 2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 4,000.00$ 41,500.00$ 6,225.00$ 5,172.50$ 56,897.50$ 8,700.00$ 88,500.00$ 13,275.00$ 11,047.50$ 121,522.50$ 2,100.00$ 22,500.00$ 3,375.00$ 2,797.50$ 30,772.50$ 7,800.00$ 79,500.00$ 11,925.00$ 9,922.50$ 109,147.50$ 8,100.00$ 81,000.00$ 12,150.00$ 10,125.00$ 111,375.00$ 1,900.00$ 20,500.00$ 3,075.00$ 2,547.50$ 28,022.50$ 14,900.00$ 150,500.00$ 22,575.00$ 18,797.50$ 206,772.50$ 3,900.00$ 40,500.00$ 6,075.00$ 5,047.50$ 55,522.50$ 2,700.00$ 27,000.00$ 4,050.00$ 3,375.00$ 37,125.00$ 3,500.00$ 36,500.00$ 5,475.00$ 4,547.50$ 50,022.50$ 2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 8,700.00$ 87,000.00$ 13,050.00$ 10,875.00$ 119,625.00$ 2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 1,900.00$ 20,500.00$ 3,075.00$ 2,547.50$ 28,022.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,800.00$ 128,000.00$ 19,200.00$ 16,000.00$ 176,000.00$ 2,100.00$ 21,000.00$ 3,150.00$ 2,625.00$ 28,875.00$ 2,700.00$ 27,000.00$ 4,050.00$ 3,375.00$ 37,125.00$ -$ 50,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 5,750.00$ 63,250.00$ -$ 100,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 11,500.00$ 126,500.00$ 1,900.00$ 69,000.00$ 10,350.00$ 8,125.00$ 89,375.00$ -$ 75,000.00$ 11,250.00$ 8,625.00$ 94,875.00$ -$ 30,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 3,450.00$ 37,950.00$ 5,236,457.50$ SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL = 22    City Council 18 – 76 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORESAbove ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)Fiber Optic undergroundAll other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)ATC signal controllerSignal cabinet on existing foundationSignal cabinet on new foundationBBS/USP (attached)BBS/UPS on existing foundationBBS/UPS on new foundationCCTVVehicle detection (ATSPM inputs + counts)Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs)Vehicle detection + bicycle detectionVehicle detectionBicycle detectionPedestrian detection (audible)Pedestrian detectionActive transportation/pedestrian safetyTransit Signal PriorityEVP (hybrid or GPS)EVP (infrared)Speed feedback signs (existing post)Speed feedback signs (new post)Signal Performance MonitoringChannelizationSignal phasing improvementCentral System (server, licenses, workstations)Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)UPS for TMC1 Brea Lambert Road15 50 30 302 Brea Birch Street15 50 30 303 Brea Orbiter Street15 50 304 Brea Birch Hills Mall15 50 30 305 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) *6 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street15 50 30 307 Placentia Golden Avenue15 50 15308 Placentia Patrician Lane15 30 30 509 Placentia Bastanchury Road15 50 30 30 5010 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard15 5011 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue1512 Placentia Madison Avenue15 3013 Placentia Alta Vista Street15 50 15 30 5014 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North)15 50 30 3015 Placentia Hawaii Way1516 Placentia Crowther Avenue1517 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue15 50 1518 Anaheim La Jolla Street15 50 30 30 3019 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue15 50 30 30 304020 Anaheim Coronado Street15 50 30 3021 Anaheim Fire Signal504022 Anaheim La Palma Avenue15 50 30 304023 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp *24 Anaheim Frontera Street15 50 30 30 304025 Orange Riverdale Avenue1503026 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue1503027 Orange Lincoln Avenue30 50 3028 Orange Fletcher Avenue30 50 3029 Orange Meats Avenue30 15 5030 Orange Grove Avenue15 50 3031 Orange Orange Olive Road32 Orange Taft Avenue30 5033 Orange Katella Avenue3034 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue30 5035 Orange Collins Avenue30 5036 Orange Walnut Avenue30 50 3037 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive30 50 3038 Orange Palm Avenue30 50 30 5039 Orange La Veta Avenue30 50 30 3040 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp *41 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp *42 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue30 15 50 15 30 50 40LOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSDESCRIPTION OF WORKTime Source None/5+ Years or Within 5 Years 0/5+ or <5 0/10+ or < 1023    City Council 18 – 77 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORESAbove ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)Fiber Optic undergroundAll other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)ATC signal controllerSignal cabinet on existing foundationSignal cabinet on new foundationBBS/USP (attached)BBS/UPS on existing foundationBBS/UPS on new foundationCCTVVehicle detection (ATSPM inputs + counts)Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs)Vehicle detection + bicycle detectionVehicle detectionBicycle detectionPedestrian detection (audible)Pedestrian detectionActive transportation/pedestrian safetyTransit Signal PriorityEVP (hybrid or GPS)EVP (infrared)Speed feedback signs (existing post)Speed feedback signs (new post)Signal Performance MonitoringChannelizationSignal phasing improvementCentral System (server, licenses, workstations)Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)UPS for TMCLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSDESCRIPTION OF WORKTime Source None/5+ Years or Within 5 Years 0/5+ or <5 0/10+ or < 1043 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue15 504044 Santa Ana 21st Street15 50 30 50 4045 Santa Ana 17th Street15 50 30 50 4046 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp15 504047 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp30 15 504048 Santa Ana Fruit Street15 50 154049 Santa Ana OC Register30 504050 Santa Ana 4th Street50 30 30 50 4051 Santa Ana 1st Street1530 5052 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue154053 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue15 50 15 30 50 4054 Santa Ana Century High School15 5050 4055 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue15 3056 Santa Ana St Andrew Place15 50 304057 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place15 504058 Santa Ana Warner Avenue15 15 3059 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr15 504060 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp15 504061 Santa Ana Dyer Road154000-1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street15 302 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street30 503 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp15 50- Santa Ana TMC Improvements40- Placentia TMC Improvements40- Orange TMC Improvements3040- Anaheim TMC Improvements40- Brea TMC Improvements4024    City Council 18 – 78 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES1 Brea Lambert Road2 Brea Birch Street3 Brea Orbiter Street4 Brea Birch Hills Mall5 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) *6 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street7 Placentia Golden Avenue8 Placentia Patrician Lane9 Placentia Bastanchury Road10 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard11 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue12 Placentia Madison Avenue13 Placentia Alta Vista Street14 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North)15 Placentia Hawaii Way16 Placentia Crowther Avenue17 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue18 Anaheim La Jolla Street19 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue20 Anaheim Coronado Street21 Anaheim Fire Signal22 Anaheim La Palma Avenue23 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp *24 Anaheim Frontera Street25 Orange Riverdale Avenue26 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue27 Orange Lincoln Avenue28 Orange Fletcher Avenue29 Orange Meats Avenue30 Orange Grove Avenue31 Orange Orange Olive Road32 Orange Taft Avenue33 Orange Katella Avenue34 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue35 Orange Collins Avenue36 Orange Walnut Avenue37 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive38 Orange Palm Avenue39 Orange La Veta Avenue40 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp *41 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp *42 Santa Ana Fairhaven AvenueLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSTiming OnlyTiming + Traffic Responsive (license only)Timing + Peer-to-Peer (configuration only)Timing + Traffic Adaptive (license only)Caltrans Cooperative AgreementY/N31.331.331.731.35050.031.327.531.335.032.515.022.532.031.315.015.026.731.032.531.345.033.05050.032.527.027.036.736.731.731.740.030.040.040.036.736.740.035.05050.05050.032.9NOTESAVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCOREOnline or Offline25    City Council 18 – 79 4/1/2025 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORESLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS43 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue44 Santa Ana 21st Street45 Santa Ana 17th Street46 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp47 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp48 Santa Ana Fruit Street49 Santa Ana OC Register50 Santa Ana 4th Street51 Santa Ana 1st Street52 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue53 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue54 Santa Ana Century High School55 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue56 Santa Ana St Andrew Place57 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place58 Santa Ana Warner Avenue59 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr60 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp61 Santa Ana Dyer Road00-1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street2 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street3 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp- Santa Ana TMC Improvements- Placentia TMC Improvements- Orange TMC Improvements- Anaheim TMC Improvements- Brea TMC ImprovementsTiming OnlyTiming + Traffic Responsive (license only)Timing + Peer-to-Peer (configuration only)Timing + Traffic Adaptive (license only)Caltrans Cooperative AgreementY/NNOTESAVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCOREOnline or Offline35.037.037.035.033.830.040.040.031.727.533.338.822.533.835.020.035.035.027.522.540.032.540.040.035.040.040.033.6AVERAGE SCORE = 26    City Council 18 – 80 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Appendix C VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)     City Council 18 – 81 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP APPENDIX C: VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ADTs Distance VMT 13,036 0.40 5,214 16,463 0.50 8,232 16,397 0.50 8,199 16,052 0.50 8,026 18,362 0.60 11,017 20,952 0.80 16,762 18,905 0.40 7,562 18,932 0.42 7,951 Anaheim 45,665 1.70 77,631 20,900 0.45 9,405 16,200 0.46 7,452 16,500 0.94 15,510 21,900 0.46 10,074 15,500 0.46 7,130 8,900 0.50 4,450 7,900 0.50 3,950 13,200 0.50 6,600 29,100 0.34 9,894 29,300 0.16 4,688 27,641 0.43 11,886 24,397 0.50 12,199 28,732 0.39 11,205 44,763 0.61 27,305 37,067 0.84 31,136 28,319 0.48 13,593 24,644 0.75 18,483 21,727 0.55 11,950 15.14 367,503 Edinger Ave - Warner Ave Warner Ave - Dyer Rd Katella Ave - Collins Ave Chapman Ave (South) - La Veta Ave La Veta Ave - SR-22 Fwy SR-22 Fwy - Fairhaven Ave Collins Ave - Walnut Ave Walnut Ave - Chapman Ave (South) McFadden Ave - Edinger Ave Fairhaven Ave - Santa Clara Ave Santa Clara Ave - 17th St 1st St - McFadden Ave Source: 2023 - Brea, Placentia, Anaheim 2022 - Santa Ana, Orange Total Project VMT: Segment Imperial Hwy (SR-90) - Golden Ave Golden Ave - Bastanchury Rd Yorba Linda Blvd - Alta Vista St Lambert Rd - Birch St Birch St - Imperial Hwy (SR-90) Lincoln Ave - Fletcher Ave Taft Ave - Katella Ave Alta Vista St - Chapman Ave (North) Chapman Ave (North) - Orangethorpe Ave Orangethorpe Ave - Riverdale AvePlacentia OrangeSanta AnaBreaRiverdale Ave - Lincoln Ave Bastanchury Rd - Yorba Linda Blvd Fletcher Ave - Taft Ave 17th St - Santa Ana Blvd/ I-5 Fwy I-5 Fwy - 1st St     City Council 18 – 82 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP AGENCY RESOLUTIONS AND LETTERS OF SUPPORT Appendix D     City Council 18 – 83 4/1/2025 Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP Appendix E Cabinet photos and As-built drawings (Uploaded to OCFundTracker and included in Electronic Submittal Only)     City Council 18 – 84 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 24/25CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To provide inter-agency traffic signal coordination and infrastructure upgrades on Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue from Lambert Road in the City of Brea through the Cities of Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange to Dyer Road in the City of Santa Ana. The project involves the Cities of Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, Orange and Caltrans. PROJECT NEED: OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan identified that Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor is part of countywide corridor system that needs multi-jurisdiction synchronization. This project will provide traffic signal upgrades and synchronize traffic signals across jurisdictional boundaries to reduce traffic congestion and maintain the synchronization improvements for 3 years. PROJECT TITLE: Kraemer Blvd/Glassell St/Grand Ave Corridor Regional Traffic Sig Sync PROJECT CATEGORY: Traffic Improvements Traffic Improvements LOCATION MAP AGENCY:DIVISION:CONTACT:DATE: Public Works Traffic Engineering Cesar Rodriguez, Senior Civil Engineer 18-Mar-2025 PROJECT COSTS FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 Construction 5,680,658 ------ Engineering 30,000 ------ TOTAL 5,710,658 ------ SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 M2 LOCAL FAIRSHARE 381,277 ------ MEASURE M2 COMPETITIVE 5,329,381 ------ TOTAL 5,710,658 ------ EXHIBIT 3     City Council 18 – 85 4/1/2025 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 19 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Pavement Management Program Update AGENDA TITLE Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for the Measure M2 Required Pavement Management Program Update (Project No. 25-6898) (Non-General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for Pavement Management Program Update services, for an amount not to exceed $135,000, which includes the base amount of $119,395 and contingency of $15,605, for a term beginning April 1, 2025 and expiring March 31, 2028, with provisions for two, one-year extensions (Agreement No. A-2025-XXX). GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency’s (PWA) Engineering Division is responsible for the administration and oversight of all Capital Improvement Projects in the City. The City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP) is an essential tool in determining the condition, expected life, recommended improvements, and associated costs of the City’s pavement assets. The program enables the City to prioritize pavement rehabilitation projects where they are most cost effective and appropriately scheduled. Additionally, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) requires that Cities update their PMPs every two years in order to remain eligible for Measure M2 funding programs. The City last completed a PMP submission accepted by OCTA in May 2024 (Exhibit 1). The City’s roadways consist of approximately 450 miles of paved streets and alleys. The roadways are divided into three networks: Arterials, Local Streets, and Alleys. Network Approximate Miles Arterials 105 Local Streets 317 Alleys 28 Total 450     City Council 19 – 1 4/1/2025 Pavement Management Program Update April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 2 0 A Pavement Management Program must be periodically updated with current street pavement assessment data to be effective and compliant. City streets were last assessed and inventoried in 2023/2024 for the 2024 PMP update. A significant portion of the proposed scope of work involves in-field, individual street assessments performed by skilled technicians and engineers. Once this data is collected, the consultant will analyze the data and prepare a report and recommendations for future street improvements. The proposed services also include mapping and Geographic Information System (GIS) support to integrate into the City's current mapping systems. The mapping and GIS will be compatible across all other City infrastructure, while also supporting internal- and public-facing dashboards and required reporting mechanisms. When complete, the refreshed PMP will be utilized by staff to recommend street improvement projects for City Council consideration via the annual budget and capital improvement program adoption process. Additionally, the City will be able to produce reports for submission to OCTA to ensure continued eligibility with Measure M2. The City’s biennial PMP submittal is due by June 2026. Staff recommends retaining the consultant through 2028 in order to revise the Pavement Management analysis on an as-needed basis as may be requested by OCTA or by State and Federal grant funding agencies, in order to assure the City maintains maximum funding eligibility. PWA released a Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 24-133 on November 26, 2024, by which it sought a qualified consultant to perform pavement condition surveys and budgetary analysis to produce the City’s PMP in compliance with the upcoming 2026 grant requirement. The RFP was advertised on the City’s online procurement management and publication system, with proposals due on December 19, 2024. A summary of vendor participation is as follows: 2,280 Vendors notified 97 Santa Ana vendors notified 46 Vendors downloaded the bid packet 3 Bids Received 0 Bids received from Santa Ana vendors In order to be deemed compliant by OCTA’s Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines (Exhibit 2), the selection of a consultant award requires at least one inspector from a consultant firm to be prequalified by OCTA for a submitted Pavement Management Plan. This ensures adherence to proper procedures and ensures the results are within acceptable variability ranges. Thus, three proposals were received and evaluated by a selection committee. Ninety-seven Santa Ana vendors were notified and zero bids were received by Santa Ana vendors. Based on criteria outlined in the RFP, the following summarizes the three responding firms and their ranking:     City Council 19 – 2 4/1/2025 Pavement Management Program Update April 1, 2025 Page 3 4 9 2 0 Firm City Rank Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.Oceanside, California 1 Nichols Consulting Engineers Fountain Valley, California 2 Quality Engineering Solutions, Inc.Glendale, California 3 Staff recommends awarding an agreement to Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. to provide services for Pavement Management Program Update based upon the scope of work and selection criteria outlined in RFP 24-133 (Exhibit 3). Their proposal demonstrated the firm has the necessary labor capacity and experience to complete the required services for the City. Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. has most recently completed the City’s PMP Update in May 2024, meeting all deliverables for the City. They received the highest score in this cycle, and upon City Council approval, will assist in completing the upcoming PMP cycle in 2026. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. FISCAL IMPACT The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available for expenditure in current FY 2024-25. Any unspent budget in FY 2024-25 will be included in future-year carryforwards for City Council consideration. Fiscal Year Accounting Unit – Account # (Proj. No.) Fund Description Accounting Unit, Account Description Amount 2024-25 03217662- 66220 (25-6898) Measure M- Street Construction Measure M2 Local Fairshare St, Improvements Other than Buildings $135,000 TOTAL $135,000 EXHIBIT(S) 1.City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 2. OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines 3. Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 19 – 3 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 2     City Council 19 – 4 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 5 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 6 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 7 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 8 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 9 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 10 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 11 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 12 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 13 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 14 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 15 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 16 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 17 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 18 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 19 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 20 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 21 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 22 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 23 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 24 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 25 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 26 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 27 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 28 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 29 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 30 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 31 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 32 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 33 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 34 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 35 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 36 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 37 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 38 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 39 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 40 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 41 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 42 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 43 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 44 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 45 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 46 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 47 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 48 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 49 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 50 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3     City Council 19 – 51 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 52 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 53 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 54 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 55 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 56 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 57 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 58 4/1/2025 Nabil Saba Digitally signed by Nabil Saba Date: 2025.03.17 14:31:22 -07'00'     City Council 19 – 59 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 60 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 61 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 62 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 63 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 64 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 65 4/1/2025     City Council 19 – 66 4/1/2025 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 20 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Water Resources Division Construction Services Section AGENDA TITLE Fiscal Year 2024-25 Create a Construction Services Section and Add 13 Full-Time Positions (Non-General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution to amend the current fiscal year 2024-25 annual budget to add 13 full- time positions and create a Construction Services Section in the Public Works Agency RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL-TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency (PWA) Water Resources Division (Water Resources) oversees the daily operations and maintenance of the City’s water and sanitary sewer systems. The water system is comprised of approximately 480 miles of water main, 21 groundwater wells, seven pump stations, 10 reservoirs with a storage capacity of 49 million gallons, four pressure regulating stations, and seven connection points to the Metropolitan Water District. The system has an average daily demand of 30 million gallons from its roughly 45,500 metered service connections. Water Resources is composed of six operating sections; five in the Water Enterprise (Fund 060) and one in the Sanitary Sewer Enterprise (Fund 056). These sections are Water Administration & Engineering, Water Utility Production & Supply, Water System Maintenance, Water Meter Services, Water Quality, and Sanitary Sewer Service. While the breadth of work being performed by Water Resources is extensive, staff proposes the addition of a new operational section which will focus primarily on capital improvements and related services for both the Water and Sewer Enterprises, such as installation of pipeline, fire hydrants, water valves, large water meter services, and backflow devices.     City Council 20 – 1 4/1/2025 Water Resources Division Construction Section April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 2 2 The City has primarily relied on outside contractors to perform this work because these services are not currently a part of Water Resources’ regular operations. However, bringing these activities in-house will streamline the construction process by removing the contract procurement process of advertising, bidding, and awarding of a project. The efficiencies gained with a dedicated infrastructure construction crew will result in a long- term cost savings and provide the City with an agile workforce capable of performing a greater scope of services, such as city-wide initiatives and emerging priorities. The utilization of an in-house workforce further reflects the City’s commitment to serving the community with quality and accountability. Proposed Team Position Title Quantity Description Water Services Worker 10 Entry-level classification for operations crews and employees performing heavy, routine, manual labor for public works projects Equipment Operator- Water Services 3 Performs skilled work in the operation of various types of heavy equipment utilized in the performance of public works projects Total 13 The team will have the materials and equipment necessary to, among other functions, specialize in: •Water pipeline installation – New pipeline construction for water distribution and transmission. •Pipeline Rehabilitation and Replacement – Repairing and replacing deteriorating assets. •Leak Detection and Inspection – Ensuring system integrity with advanced testing methods. •Emergency Repairs and Maintenance – 24/7 Response for pipeline failures. •Wastewater Pipeline Installation – Complementary infrastructure service. Additionally, the establishment of this new team will allow resources to be readily available to address immediate needs within the public right of way. Based on City needs, some areas the team would work on include sidewalk and pothole repairs, street improvements, and small construction projects. Staff will establish a process to ensure appropriate funding is allocated when the team works on non-water and non-sewer related activities, by which the time and materials will be charged to the appropriate fund to ensure compliance with funding regulations. Staff recommends the approval of the recommended action in order to enhance operational efficiency, achieve long-term cost savings, and ensure a responsive and     City Council 20 – 2 4/1/2025 Water Resources Division Construction Section April 1, 2025 Page 3 4 9 2 2 agile workforce capable of addressing both planned capital improvements and emerging infrastructure needs (Exhibit 1). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT To ensure the construction crew operates within existing resources, a funding approach has been developed that aligns costs with the type of work being performed. This approach allows the City to maximize efficiency while minimizing reliance on outside contractors. Proposed Funding Approach: •Water Fund: No additional budget impact, as water-related projects are already funded in the current budget and will continue to be included in future budget proposals. The construction crew will charge their time to these projects, reducing reliance on outside contractors while staying within the existing budget. •Other Funding Sources: When not working on water-related projects, the construction crew will charge their time to other funding sources, such as the General Fund, based on the work performed. In return, Public Works will use less of the contract services budget, ensuring they remain within the existing budget. This approach ensures a net-zero budget impact. Additionally, the March 4th Mid-Year Budget Update staff report included a request for one-time funding from the Water and Sewer Funds to purchase equipment needed to support the crew in performing this work efficiently. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution to Amend the Current Fiscal Year 2024-2025 to Add Full-Time Positions in the Public Works Agency Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 20 – 3 4/1/2025 Resolution 2025-XXX Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FULL-TIME POSITIONS IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A.On June 18, 2024, the City Council passed and adopted Ordinance NS -3067, establishing the City’s Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and authorizing position allocations for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The ordinance also sets forth the requirement that alterations in the allocations of authorized positions be reviewed and approved by the City Council. B.On October 1, 2024, the City Council approved appropriation adjustments to carryover unspent amounts from Fiscal Year 2023 -2024 to Fiscal Year 2024-2025. C.On November 19, 2024, the City Council passed Resolution 2024 -066, amending the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget by adding four (4) full -time positions. D.On March 4, 2025, the City Council passed Resolution 2025-008 amending the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget by adding seven (7) full -time positions and reallocating six (6) full-time positions. E.The Executive Director of the Public Works Agency currently requests to add three (3) Equipment Operators-Water Services, and ten (10) Water Services Workers. Section 2. The City’s annual budget for Fiscal Year 2024 -25, as amended, is hereby further amended to add the following positions in the Public Works Agency at the monthly seven-step salary range as indicated: Classification Title Number of Positions Added Scale Monthly Salary Minimum Monthly Salary Maximum Equipment Operator- Water Services 3 651 $5,307 $7,110 Water Services Worker II 10 631 $4,809 $6,450 Section 3. All classification salary rate ranges are set forth in the City’s “Salary Schedule” as periodically updated. EXHIBIT 1     City Council 20 – 4 4/1/2025 Resolution 2025-XXX Page 2 of 2 Section 4. Except as amended by this resolution, all other provisions of the Annual Budget for the Fiscal Year 2024-2025, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. This Resolution is operative from and after the date upon which it is adopted. ADOPTED this 1st day of April 2025. ________________________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: _________________________ Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2025- ___ to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on April 1, 2025. Date: ___________________ ____________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana     City Council 20 – 5 4/1/2025 City Attorney’s Office www.santa-ana.org/city-attorneys-office Item # 21 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code AGENDA TITLE Omnibus Amendments to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Including Meeting Frequency for the Personnel Board, Contracting Authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney, and Relying on State Law Regarding Campaign Contributions Effect on Proceedings Involving a License, Permit or other Entitlement for Use RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve the First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as to Section 2-328 Regarding Meetings; Chairperson and Recording Secretary of Appointive Boards and Commissions, Adding Section 2-331.5 Regarding Meetings of the Personnel Board, Amending the Title of Article VII of Chapter 2, Amending Section 2-748 Regarding City Manager Contracting Authority, Adding Section 2-748 Regarding City Attorney and City Clerk Contracting Authority, and Repealing Section 2-107 Regarding Prohibited Campaign Contributions. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2-328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2-331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHPATER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2-748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2-749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2-107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION Section 2-328-Meetings; chairperson; recording secretary Section 2-328 is part of Division 2 “Appointive Boards and Commissions” in Article IV “Officers, Departments, Boards and Commissions” in Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (“SAMC”). Division 2 contains sections that are applicable to all City     City Council 21 – 1 4/1/2025 Omnibus Ordinance Amendment April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 4 2 Boards and Commissions. Section 2-328 addresses meetings, election of a chairperson and recording secretaries for all Boards and Commissions but also contains a provision specific to the Personnel Board which states that the Board will meet monthly provided that there is business on the agenda to come before it. This provision is being deleted and a new code section regarding meetings for the Personnel Board will be added to Division 3 which contains municipal code provisions specific to that Board. Section 2-331.5- [New] Meetings The City of Santa Ana Personnel Board was established by the City of Santa Ana Charter and Municipal Code. One of the Board's principal duties is to provide a final administrative review of disciplinary matters involving permanent employees of the City of Santa Ana who have been demoted, suspended, or dismissed/terminated from employment. The Board's appellate review is a full evidentiary hearing wherein the Board applies its independent judgment to the law, facts, and arguments presented in each case. The duration of individual hearings varies. These proceedings include pre-hearing procedures, the evidentiary hearing, and Board deliberation and decision proceedings. Hearings are conducted in the evenings and require the coordination of many schedules due to the large number of individuals involved, including the employee/appellant and their representative(s), the City representative(s), City staff, the seven (7) Board members, Board counsel, witnesses, and a court reporter. Hearings take at a minimum twenty to twenty-five (20-25) calendar days to conclude; see attached Sample Timeline of an Appeal to the Personnel Board (Exhibit 1). However, the average case is heard over ten (10) – fourteen (14) evenings which will take eight (8) to twelve (12) months due to scheduling coordination. The ordinance addition would change the Personnel Board meetings from a minimum of one meeting a month (assuming there is business before the Board) to a minimum of two meetings a month, on the second and fourth Thursdays of each month, provided the Board has business. This will facilitate advance scheduling and a more efficient execution of the Personnel Board appeals by establishing a minimum of two (2) evenings per month available for hearing appeals. The Personnel Board has met on this issue and identified that they prefer the second and fourth Thursdays of the month as Regular Meeting dates. Establishing the Regular Meeting dates does not preclude the Personnel Board from meeting more often while hearing an appeal. Sections 2-748 and 2-749 [New] City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney Contracting Authority On November 5, 2024, the voters approved a Charter amendment to provide contracting authority to the City Clerk and City Attorney based upon the purchasing policies and dollar limitations established for the City Manager or at such other amounts adopted by the City Council. A municipal code amendment is proposed to implement such contracting     City Council 21 – 2 4/1/2025 Omnibus Ordinance Amendment April 1, 2025 Page 3 4 9 4 2 authority and to make clarifying revisions to provisions of the code that address the City Manager’s contracting authority. Section 2-107 Prohibited Campaign Contributions Effective January 1, 2023, SB 1439 removed the exception for local government agencies relating to the Levine Act provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974. It was thereafter amended by SB 1243 effective January 1, 2025 increasing the threshold of campaign contributions from $250 to $500 and making additional amendments related to contract exclusions, an extended cure period, agent contributions and the definition of a “participant.” The Levine Act prohibits an officer of an agency from accepting, soliciting, or directing a contribution of more than $500 from any party, participant, or a party or participant’s agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use is pending before the agency and for 12 months following the date a final decision is made in the proceeding. SAMC Section 2-107 provides in pertinent part that “[n]o councilmember or any campaign committee controlled by the councilmember shall solicit or accept any campaign contribution or loan of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) or more from any person for a period of three (3) months following the date a final decision is rendered in any proceeding before the council involving a license, permit, or other entitlement, if the councilmember knows or has reason to know that the person had a financial interest in the proceeding.” The Levine Act covers the same conduct as set forth in SAMC Section 2-107 over a longer period of time but with a $500 threshold rather than the $250 threshold of the SAMC. Section 2-107 only covers three months following the date of a final decision while the Levine Act covers twelve months after the date of the final decision. It is proposed to repeal Section 2-107 and to default to the Levine Act under state law. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Sections 2-328 and 2-331.5- Frequency of Personnel Board Meetings The estimated cost of the additional meeting per month is $16,200 from the General Fund for the remainder of FY 24/25. The estimated cost of the additional meeting per month totals $64,800 from the General Fund for FY 25/26. These funds are already budgeted for in the Human Resources General Fund account in the current fiscal year. The proposed FY25/26 budget will include sufficient recurring allocations for two meetings per month. Account Fiscal Year Estimated Amount 01109050 62300 Contracted Services – Professional 24/25 $13,575 01109050 62302 Contracted Services – Personnel 24/25 $2,100 01109050 63001 Miscellaneous Operating Expenses 24/25 $525     City Council 21 – 3 4/1/2025 Omnibus Ordinance Amendment April 1, 2025 Page 4 4 9 4 2 Total 24/25 $16,200 01109050 62300 Contracted Services – Professional 25/26 $54,300 01109050 62302 Contracted Services – Personnel 25/26 $8,400 01109050 63001 Miscellaneous Operating Expenses 25/26 $2,100 Total 25/26 $64,800 Sections 2-748 and 2-749 [New] City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney Contracting Authority There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. All contracts entered into pursuant to the City Clerk’s and City Attorney’s contracting authority would be taken from already budgeted accounts. Section 2-107 Prohibited Campaign Contributions There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. There are no expenditure of funds associated with this Section or repealing this Section. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Timeline 2. Ordinance Submitted By: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 21 – 4 4/1/2025 Personnel Board Hearing Timeline The following timeline was created for training purposes to provide a visual representation of the process of a Personnel Board Hearing based on the Personnel Board Rules. Timing can vary significantly on a case by case basis. Employee received Notice of Adverse Action Appeal filed (If within 10 days it is timely and added to case log, if timeliness is in question the Secretary will confer with Chair to determine timeliness.) Scheduling Meeting (Board and both parties) Pre-hearing meeting to determine if the case is ready to be heard (Chair, Vice Chair, Legal Advisor, both parties) (Evidence turned in 20 days prior) Evidence and witness list turned in 20 days prior to pre- hearing meeting Hearing Opening Statements Hearing Evidence presented Hearing Closing statements Board deliberations Board announces decision Board reviews and adopts written statement prepared by Legal Advisor Board Legal Advisor prepares written statement of decision (typically 4-6 weeks)     City Council 21 – 5 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE AS TO SECTION 2-328 REGARDING MEETINGS; CHAIRPERSON AND RECORDING SECRETARY OF APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ADDING SECTION 2-331.5 ENTITLED MEETINGS, AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 2, AMENDING SECTION 2-748 REGARDING CITY MANAGER CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, ADDING SECTION 2-749 REGARDING CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND REPEALING SECTION 2-107 REGARDING PROHIBITED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2-238 of Division 2 of Article IV of Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (new language is underlined and deleted language is stricken): Sec. 2-328. Meetings; chairperson; recording secretary. The election of each chairperson and vice-chairperson shall be held at the meetings of the respective boards and commissions during the month of July of each year. The board or commission, in the event of a vacancy in the office of the chairperson or vice - chair person, shall elect one (1) of its members for the unexpired term. The chairperson shall have the responsibility for informing the city council of board, commission, or committee actions or inactions and the reasons therefore. The city manager or his or her designee shall designate a secretary for the recording of minutes for each of such boards and commissions, who shall keep a record of its proceedings and transactions. Each board and commission shall prescribe rules and regulations governing its operations which shall be consistent with the charter, this Code, and shall be filed with the city clerk of the council for public inspection. The personnel board shall meet monthly, provided there is business on the agenda to come before it. Section 2. Section 2-331.5 shall be added to Division 3 of Article IV of Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code to read as follows:     City Council 21 – 6 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 2 of 5 Sec. 2-331.5. - Meetings. The personal board shall meet twice a month on the second and fourth Thursdays, provided there is business on the agenda to come before it. Section 3. The title of Article VII of Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (new language is underlined and deleted language is stricken): ARTICLE VII. - CITY MANAGER’S , CITY CLERK AND CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACTING AUTHORITY Section 4. Subsection (a) (1) of Section 2-748 of Article VII, of Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (new language is underlined and deleted language is stricken): Sec. 2-748.- City manager’s contracting authority. (a) Non-public works contracts. (1)The city manager is authorized to bind the city to any one (1) or more written non-public works contract, per vendor, in an amount or amounts not exceeding the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) per department, and per each Fiscal Year. For purposes of this section, a non-public works contract shall mean any contract not deemed to be a public works contract under subsection (b)(1). (2)The city manager is hereby authorized to bind the city on amendments to any one (1) non-public works contract when such amendment for any one (1) non-public works contract, together with any previously approved amendments for said contract, do not cumulatively amount to an increase of the city's expenditure obligation under said contract of more than twenty (20) percent of the original contract amount. (b) Public works contracts. (1)The city manager is authorized to bind the city to any one (1) or more written public works contract, per vendor, in an amount or amounts not exceeding the sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). For purposes of this section, a public works contract shall be deemed to mean a project for the erection, improvement, and/or maintenance, inspection, testing and repair of public buildings, streets, drains, sewers, or parks. (2)The city manager is authorized to bind the city to any one (1) written contract for emergency public works construction in an amount not exceeding the sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). (3)The city manager is hereby authorized to bind the city on change orders to any one (1) public works contract, when such change order for any one (1) public works contract, together with any previously approved change orders for said contract, do not     City Council 21 – 7 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 3 of 5 cumulatively amount to an increase of the city's expenditure obligation under said contract of more than twenty (20) percent of the original contract amount. (c)Website access and search features. (1) All agreements approved by the Ccity Mmanager shall be posted to the City's website on a quarterly basis. (2) The City's website shall provide search capabilities allowing users to search any and all agreements approved by the Ccity Mmanager based on words, phrases, and dollar amounts. Section 5. A new section 2-749 is hereby added to Article VII of Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code to read as follows: Sec. 2-749. - City Attorney and City Clerk contracting authority. (a) The city attorney is authorized to bind the city to any one (1) or more written contracts for goods or services, to conduct department business, per vendor and per each Fiscal Year where said contract does not exceed the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). (b) The city clerk is authorized to bind the city to any one (1) or more written contracts for goods or services, to conduct department business, per vendor and per each Fiscal Year where said contract does not exceed the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). (c) Website access and search features. (1) All agreements approved by the city attorney and city clerk shall be posted to the City's website on a quarterly basis. (2) The City's website shall provide search capabilities allowing users to search any and all agreements approved by the city attorney and city clerk based on words, phrases, and dollar amounts. Section 6. Section 2-107 of Article II of Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is repealed in its entirety. Sec. 2-107. - Prohibited campaign contributions. No councilmember or any campaign committee controlled by the councilmember shall solicit or accept any campaign contribution or loan of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) or more from any person for a period of three (3) months following the date a final decision is rendered in any proceeding before the council involving a license, permit, or other entitlement, if the councilmember knows or has reason to know that the person had a financial interest in the proceeding. Financial interest, for purposes of this section, shall have the meaning it is defined to have in Title 9 of the California Government Code (the Political Reform Act). The mayor is a councilmember     City Council 21 – 8 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 4 of 5 for purposes of this section. Section 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 8. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of April, 2025. _______________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: ____________________________ Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers ABSENT: Councilmembers     City Council 21 – 9 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, JENNIFER L. HALL, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify th e attached Ordinance No. NS-XXXXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2025. Date: _________________ _______________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana     City Council 21 – 10 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/pb Item # 22 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 1, 2025 TOPIC: Transit Zoning Code Amendments AGENDA TITLE Resolution to Make Findings and Adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024- 03 Amending Certain Sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Addressing Industrial Land Uses, Nonconformities, and Operating Standards, and Amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to Remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Suffixes from Certain Properties Within the SD-84 District Boundary Legal notice published in the OC Reporter on March 21, 2025 and mailed on same day. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD-84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non-conforming use regulations, including the addition of an     City Council 22 – 1 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 2 4 9 1 1 amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non-conforming uses. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024-02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024-03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD-84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY GOVERNMENT §84308 CODE APPLIES: Yes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD- 84 Zoning District. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the moratorium. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code as necessary to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council.    City Council 22 – 2 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 3 4 9 1 1 Based upon City Council direction, and the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 proposing to amend certain sections of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development (SD) No. 84 zoning district. The ZOA proposes amendments that would modify the list of land uses and permit types, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations, including the addition of an amortization process/termination of use process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps. A second ordinance, Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03, proposes to delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. DISCUSSION The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development No. 84 The SD-84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The TZC includes the Civic Center, Downtown, and the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and as established residential communities. The TZC is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. Prior to the implementation of the TZC, the area consisted of a wide range of civic, commercial, industrial, and residential land uses regulated by varying zoning districts. In June 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2804, creating the TZC, whose purpose was to establish a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. In July 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2970, amending the TZC to modify certain design criteria regulating height, massing, open space location, driveway standards, lot dimensions, and parking alternatives. The amendment did not include changes to land uses or permit types within the TZC. When originally adopted, the TZC provided new zoning for all properties contained within its boundary. However, some properties with existing M1 and M2 zoning and/or existing industrial businesses, also received an overlay district designation which allowed for the continuation of industrial land uses on those properties. The development of mixed-use on these properties consistent with the new zoning they received as part of the TZC adoption is at the discretion of the property owner. In support of the TZC, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. However, due to the continued     City Council 22 – 3 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 4 4 9 1 1 application of the industrial overlay zones within the TZC, the implementation of the new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts with the new General Plan. Since establishment of the TZC, and specifically in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, undergone expansions or intensifications, and have continued to create numerous land use conflicts and disturbances that affect surrounding residential communities. Specifically, in the Logan neighborhood alone, these land uses create quality of life, health and safety, and other trespass issues for residential properties that often directly abut these industrial land uses. These issues include odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts that have taken place for nearly a decade and a half despite the change to the new General Plan land use designations. Historically Disadvantaged Communities and Senate Bill (SB) 1000 Prior to the adoption of the TZC, the City permitted industrial uses within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools. The Logan neighborhood represents one of Orange County’s oldest barrios, established as early as 1886, and was one of the few areas where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent could purchase land due to racially restrictive covenants during the first half of the 20th century. Further, as a neighborhood, the area was established before the modern practice of separating or regulating impactful land uses, also known as zoning. The Logan neighborhood itself was largely settled by 1900, before the practice of zoning was enshrined by Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926. By that time, the neighborhood contained a mix of residential, industrial, commercial, and related land uses, in some cases side-by-side, with issues further exacerbated by rail lines, fuel storage depots, and the construction of the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5) between 1947 and 1956. Comprehensive data analysis and mapping tools generated by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), the Center for Diseases Control/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and California Healthy Places Index (HPI) reveal concerning information regarding environmental conditions impacting residents in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Recent CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data confirms that these neighborhoods rank at 90% or above among California’s most pollution-burdened communities, with Environmental Justice (EJ) maps showing higher exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Air Toxics Cancer Risk, Hazardous Waste Proximity, Diesel Particulate Matter, and Toxic Releases to Air. This information is included as Exhibit 4 to this staff report. These multiple sources of environmental exposure and pollution burden communities of color, including the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, present an alarming set of challenges that affect residents’ quality of life and life expectancy with continued heavy industrial uses nearby.     City Council 22 – 4 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 5 4 9 1 1 Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2016, requiring local governments to address pollution and other hazards that disproportionately impact low-income and communities of color within their jurisdiction to proactively plan for and address environmental concerns when developing and updating components of the General Plan. The City and community worked to ensure that the new General Plan included SB 1000 requirements of addressing EJ through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options. Of note, the City’s new General Plan mixed- use land use designations in the TZC area were largely left intact, including those in the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods, when the General Plan Update was adopted in 2022. Environmental Justice/Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Profile: Logan and Lacy Neighborhood Impacts For the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, incompatible land uses allowed from past zoning decisions, including the industrial overlay zones, have perpetuated the practices of locating industrial uses or other noxious and unwanted uses near communities of color. The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods have a population of 5,907 within 1,564 households, a median household income of $56,864, average household size of nearly four persons, median age 27 years, and per-capita income of $23,495. Seventy-four percent are renter- occupied units based on demographic forecasts for 2023. Nearly 25% of the population is under 14 years of age, and 14% are 55 years of age and older. Nearly 3% of the population attended up to 12th grade with no diploma, over 31% are high school graduates, and nearly 97% of the working population over 16 years of age are employed.1 This data illustrates that the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90% or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model. Failure to address ongoing irreconcilable land use conflicts that are the target of this proposed ordinance will further exacerbate the ongoing demographic and environmental justice challenges that these two neighborhoods within the TZC have grappled with since their founding. Code Enforcement and Immediate Ongoing Issues In the past 12 months, the Code Enforcement Division conducted investigations at over 35 commercial and industrial properties within the TZC. Currently, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has 21 active open cases that have been issued Notices of 1 ESRI Community Analyst summary data, which utilizes U.S. Census Bureau sources (2017-2021 American Community Survey & 2020 Decennial Census Data), enhanced by ESRI’s forecasts and aggregations, covering demographics like population, income, age, and employment.    City Council 22 – 5 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 6 4 9 1 1 Violation and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. These violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. This activity demonstrates the City’s direct involvement in overseeing these businesses to mitigate potential environmental and public health risks. Since June 2023, the TZC communities have experienced a marked increase in impacts stemming from the irreconcilable industrial and residential land use conflicts in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Residents in the TZC have voiced and emailed complaints and public health concerns to City staff regarding emitted contaminants and zoning violations from industrial businesses in the neighborhoods. Concerns that range from air pollution and smoke, toxic release exposures, idling trucks on residential streets, lead exposure, illegal storage, unpermitted uses, loud noise at night, and other property maintenance pose an immediate public health threat that is straining public resources to continuously investigate and address these matters. Specifically, a fire incident at a crematory located in the neighborhood alarmed neighbors at 9:18 p.m. on August 29, 2023. Residents shared with City officials’ video of high flames escaping the stack on the rooftop, screeching noise that continued nonstop for ten minutes, and what was described as a foul odor attributed to the fire. City staff followed up with external regulatory agencies issuing permits to operate this facility, and quickly, staff observed the limitations from regulatory agencies and their compartmentalized processes to investigate and act on enforcement measures. On August 9, 2024, the City received a complaint with photos of the same crematory in which the complainant observed bodies stored in a container outside the facility. A City code enforcement inspector issued an abatement notice that same day; the bodies and container were removed and the case was closed on August 13, 2024 by code enforcement staff. Other recent incidents include a large fire at an open- air industrial recycling facility at 1035 E. Fourth Street on March 23, 2025 that resulted in contaminated effluent from water used in fire-fighting efforts draining into local gutters. Since 2022, the City has enhanced community services by restructuring its Planning Division to contain a Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section, which oversees, among other functions, environmental justice efforts in Santa Ana and regional coordination to address such issues. Staff encountered difficulty in achieving desired enforcement outcomes with external regulatory agencies such as South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Department of Consumer Affairs Cemetery and Funeral Bureau (CFB), and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) with several heavy industrial business operators in the TZC. This is supported through internal correspondence and phone conversations with staff from these agencies to understand their investigation and compliance processes. To address issues of industrial operators, including recycling and waste processing facilities near schools and residential areas, the City adopted new regulations such as a Noxious Uses Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS- 3044, adopted June 20, 2023) to include a notification requirement to the City by the property owner to obtain a permit from a regulatory public agency; a requirement of a 1,000 linear foot distance buffer measured from the outermost boundary of the subject property; and a conditional use permit requirement when businesses require a permit     City Council 22 – 6 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 7 4 9 1 1 from a regulatory public agency to handle, store, emit, or discharge particulate materials, exhaust emissions, or regulated compounds, or chemicals near a public park, school (K- 12), or property zoned for residential purposes. City staff have also researched commercial real estate acquisition data and current for- sale properties to identify any trends that could potentially generate an increase in the application of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance for proposed or expanded industrial uses. From September 2022 to date, 15 properties (six commercial, three office, and six industrial businesses) sold. Three of those businesses (800-808 E. Washington Avenue, 1045 N. Fuller Street, and 923 N. Logan Street) are located in the Logan neighborhood. Currently, multi-tenant industrial and manufacturing warehouse spaces are on the market for lease located in the TZC. Recent City Council Actions and Direction to Address TZC Land Use Conflicts On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the TZC through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the TZC. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the moratorium. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code as necessary to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. As part of its approval, the City Council expressed a desire for City staff to begin evaluating permanent solutions to the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area in as timely a manner as possible, which resulted in immediate evaluation of the zoning code text and map amendments consistent with direction provided for the City Council’s consideration as part of this request. Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the moratorium, City staff conducted an interagency meeting that included representatives from multiple City departments: the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Additionally, engagement with additional agencies such as the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD), Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the     City Council 22 – 7 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 8 4 9 1 1 extent to which industrial activities interface with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that application of the moratorium affects approximately 127 industrial businesses in the TZC. Of the affected businesses, approximately three have active applications for permits, primarily seeking to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties. City staff reviewed public safety data from SAPD and OCFA to assess community concerns regarding emergency responses in the TZC. SAPD records show a total of 18,736 calls for service between March 2023 and July 2024, with 226 of those occurring between April and July 2024 within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. These calls encompassed a wide range of incidents, including patrol checks, disturbances, and traffic- related issues. Notably, 1,909 calls involved collisions, vehicle impoundments, domestic violence, and SAMC violations. OCFA data from 2022 to August 2024 indicates 238 calls for advanced life support emergencies. In 2022, 29 calls were related to respiratory issues, chest pain, and cardiac arrest, with a subsequent 7% increase in health-related calls in 2023. While the data reflects a broad spectrum of emergency responses, the concentration of industrial businesses in the TZC raises the possibility that some of these calls, particularly those related to respiratory issues and traffic incidents, may be influenced by industrial operations. Further analysis is needed to determine the specific correlation between industrial activity and public safety concerns in the area. Currently, City staff have an internal process established that continues to track and monitor incoming notices of compliance or notices of violations from outside regulatory agencies issued to a particular business/operator. City Code Enforcement activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance continue being monitored at these facilities. Code Enforcement data show enforcement activity within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the moratorium, 16 active open cases were issued Notices of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. Recent code enforcement complaints on properties in the Logan neighborhood involve complaints for recurring unpermitted work and land use violations that involve large commercial vehicles blocking street access and impacting nearby residents. Review of Records and Activities of External Regulatory Agencies To broaden the analysis beyond the City's local land use impacts, City staff have received public records requested of compliance status, violation records, and violation status of outside regulatory agencies, and have contacted staff from external regulatory agencies such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), Santa Ana Regional Quality Water Control Board (SARQWCB), the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA), California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) and others responsible for issuing regulatory permits for industrial uses     City Council 22 – 8 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 9 4 9 1 1 in the TZC. Specifically, these agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities, and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities and have received current data requests for sites located within the TZC zoning district. Data from outside regulatory agencies assists City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Records show SCAQMD issued two notices to comply with one industrial business on August 2023 and April 2024 for failure to maintain records, such as temperature graphs, poundage logs, and source test data. SCAQMD issued several permits to construct and to operate to the new operator of this same facility, which is currently in compliance with SCAQMD. Two notices of violation were issued to one industrial business for operating a paint spray booth without a valid permit to operate from SCAQMD. The report from the SARWQCB from 2024 shows three (3) active industrial business in the TZC in violation of their permit for providing a late report or incomplete and/or insufficient information for their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). In March 2025, one of the three businesses with active violations concluded a financial settlement directly with the SARWQCB agency. Public records from the CUPA for Orange County, spanning 2022-2024, reveal a pattern of non-compliance with environmental and hazardous materials regulations among industrial businesses within the TZC. While some 2023 violations related to Hazardous Material Business Plan staff training and reporting were later corrected, current records indicate four businesses still have multiple open violations. These ongoing issues include non-compliance with documentation for hazardous waste transportation and disposal, as well as deficiencies in industrial stormwater reporting requirements. Notably, records from 2022-2024 show repeated failures to submit required stormwater reports and deficiencies in hazardous waste management and emergency response planning, including missing documentation and training. These violations highlight potential risks to public health and the environment. Air emission complaints continue to be reported to SCAQMD. These complaints included one involving black smoke and another regarding unpermitted soil vapor extraction equipment onsite. SCAQMD staff has clarified that for air quality complaints they receive, their inspector is required to be physically present to observe the activity from the facility described in the complaint to determine if the complaint warrants further investigation or enforcement action in accordance with SCAQMD Rules 401 (Visible Emissions), 402 (Public Nuisance), and 403 (Fugitive Dust). Therefore, although community members continue to share concerns with City and SCAQMD staff, the turnaround time for an SCAQMD inspector     City Council 22 – 9 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 10 4 9 1 1 to be physically present at an SCAQMD-permitted facility to investigate an air quality complaint, especially if a complaint is reported after working hours or on weekends, is ineffective in addressing the immediate needs of the community. The proposed amendments for the TZC aim to strengthen the City's land use regulatory authority, providing a necessary tool to address the deficiencies of outside regulatory agencies and their permitting and oversight, and to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Public Engagement Following City Council's extension of the TZC moratorium on May 21, 2024, City staff have been developing permanent regulations for the TZC district for the City Council’s consideration. Leading up to the special Planning Commission meeting held on March 6, 2025, City staff engaged in a comprehensive outreach effort regarding TZC regulations, holding 20 meetings in various formats with affected stakeholders. This included: •Direct engagement through eight individual and group meetings with business owners and brokers, •Two focus group meetings with TZC business owners, •Community outreach involving two neighborhood/resident group meetings, •Two City-hosted TZC (SD-84) meetings: The October 22, 2024 City Informational Meeting and the March 3, 2025 Community Meeting, •Three site visits at the request of businesses, and •Three Planning Commission meetings (February 10, 2025 Study Session and February 24/March 6 Public Hearings). This extensive engagement aimed to gather diverse input for the development of permanent TZC regulations. To proactively ensure important communications reached all stakeholders, City staff mailed notices to all property owners and occupants, comprising 3,599 addresses, within the Transit Zoning Code area for each of the following meetings: the October 22, 2024 City Informational Meeting, the Planning Commission February 10, 2025 Study Session and February 24, 2025 Public Hearing notice, and the City Council April 1, 2025 Public Hearing Notice. On January 15, 2025, City staff made draft TZC (SD-84) regulations available to the public for review in advance of the scheduled Planning Commission study session on February 10, 2025 and public hearing on February 24, 2025. The amendments address the permitted uses table, nonconforming regulations, amortization, and operational standards, and are designed to prepare for the TZC moratorium's expiration on April 15, 2025. Staff met with business owners and brokers on January 30, 2025, to discuss the draft regulations and met with the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods meeting on February 19, 2025, and again with a focus group of industrial businesses on February 20, 2025. Staff have continued to update the TZC moratorium project webpage with additional updates, including     City Council 22 – 10 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 11 4 9 1 1 the Study Session and Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice, Planning Commission’s Study Session PowerPoint presentation, and the draft ordinance and clarifications presented to the Planning Commission. City staff have also prepared two Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents to clarify information regarding the moratorium, affected businesses, the proposed zoning amendments, legal concerns, community engagement, and opportunities to participate in the public hearing process. The first FAQ became available prior to the City’s project informational meeting on October 22, 2024, and the second FAQ was made available on February 24, 2025, and is included as Exhibit 5 to this staff report. City staff from the Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section of the Planning Division continue to coordinate with City departments, external regulatory agencies, and staff from other federal and state agencies to identify additional resources available to enhance deeper awareness of pollution exposure in disadvantaged communities, long-term health effects, and immediate solutions. The NIES team has held meetings and discussions with staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and CalEPA Environmental Justice Team to identify opportunities for linking environmental justice (EJ) resources and support to the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods The recent SoCal Gas Company’s Climate grant award from the City from the SoCal Gas Company’s Climate Grant award will further assist in obtaining baseline air quality data and education in these communities. Current Code and Proposed Amendments to Text, Figures, and Maps Based upon the City Council’s actions and direction enacting the moratorium combined with the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared the proposed zoning ordinance (ZOA No. 2024-02) and zoning map (AA No. 2024-03) amendments. The proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Table 1: ZOA No. 2024-02 Current and Proposed Text Regulations Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Application of Article SAMC Section 41-2001 establishes the land uses and standards applicable to the TZC - primarily for new uses. The update to text of this Section clarifies that the regulations apply to existing uses, whether conforming or nonconforming.     City Council 22 – 11 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 12 4 9 1 1 Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Organization SAMC Section 41-2001.5 establishes the contents and organization of the TZC regulations The update to the text is necessary to encompass the new Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses). Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses SAMC Section 41-2002 establishes the regulations for nonconforming buildings, structures or uses within the TZC boundary. The provisions contain minimal limits for rehabilitation of buildings and structures and their expansion for both residential and non- residential uses. The update to text of this Section will further limit some rehabilitation of buildings and structures, with specific emphasis on nonconforming industrial uses. These updated provisions include: •Requiring rehabilitation or expansion of buildings and structures, occupied by any nonconforming use to comply with the new operational standards contained in Section 41-2009. •Prohibits expansion of a building or structure occupied by a nonconforming industrial use. •Elimination of certain nonconforming uses and structures. •Establishes a process for enacting amortization periods for eliminating certain nonconforming uses. •References to SAMC and State law for abatement of public nuisances. •Establishes authority for voluntary compliance agreements between the City and nonconforming uses. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone SAMC Section 41-2004 establishes an overlay zone applied to M1 and M2 zoned properties located within the TZC boundary. Section 41-2004 is deleted in its entirety, removing the I-OZ Zone from the TZC to eliminate industrial land use type zoning altogether. Application for Discretionary Approvals SAMC Section 41-2005 establishes the process and timing of vesting for certain uses approved with a discretionary permit. Section 41-2005 is updated to add clarification for effects of the amendments to the TZC dependent upon status of an application in the City process of review, approval, and/or building permit issuance, if required. Zones Established SAMC Section 41-2006 contains the regulations for zoning districts, land uses, and permit types within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section deletes the I-OZ Zone, including replacing Figure 2.1, the Regulating Plan (map) with a new Figure 2.1 removing the I-OZ Zone designation from all parcels within the TZC boundary.     City Council 22 – 12 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 13 4 9 1 1 Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Uses Permitted SAMC Section 41-2007 provides the allowable land uses and permit types required to establish a land use by each zoning district within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section clarifies application of the use standards by zoning district as follows: •Modifies Table 2A containing the Use Standards by adding and reclassifying certain land use types appropriate to the TZC land use subcategories •Deletes certain land use types that are inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the TZC, including the deletion of the Small-Scale Industry land use subcategory in its entirety. Operational Standards for Permitted Uses SAMC Section 41-2008 primarily regulates new uses within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section further limits certain operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses SAMC Section 41-2009 is an entirely new set of regulations specific to existing nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC. The new Section establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. The regulations cover general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. Definitions SAMC Section 41-2080 contains the definitions applicable to terms and land uses of the TZC. The update to the text of this Section provides clarification for certain land use types (artisan/craft product with limited on-site production, commercial recreation facility – indoor, and research and development), adds definitions for land use types (automobile repair, automobile service, business support services, craft and specialized automotive restoration service, pet day care facility and trade school), and deletes corresponding definitions for land use types that were deleted as part of the amendments to SAMC Section 41- 2006. Analysis of the Issues The proposed amendments to the Sections of the TZC under the topic headings of Application of Article, Organization, Application for Discretionary Approvals, and Definitions are largely to ensure internal consistency related to the more substantive changes being proposed for the TZC to address irreconcilable land use conflicts, described as follows: •Nonconforming Structures and Uses - Section 41-2002 regulates the nonconforming building, structure or use specifically within the TZC. The regulations are unique to     City Council 22 – 13 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 14 4 9 1 1 the TZC and do not apply citywide. The regulations determine under certain circumstances when a nonconforming structure or use can rehabilitate both structural or nonstructural; or expand conditions that would allow expansion. Due to the concerns enumerated within this report related to nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC, the amendments to this section increasingly limit rehabilitation of structures to those types of improvements that address compliance with the new Section 41-2009 operational standards for nonconforming industrial uses; and disallow the expansion of any nonconforming industrial use. This Section also includes new provisions to establish a process for the discontinuance of nonconforming uses, specifically noxious uses, and the elimination of those uses or structures through an amortization hearing process. The tools that these new regulations provide are necessary to address the environmental impacts that lead to the adoption of the moratorium, provide the framework to initiate the process to eliminate noxious industrial land uses from the TZC, and align with the adopted EJ policies of the General Plan. •The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone – Section 41-2004 created an “exception” zone for properties within the TZC that had already contained M1 or M2 industrial zoning, uses and structures, when the TZC was adopted in 2010. In order to be both consistent and to promulgate the new General Plan land use designations within the TZC, the removal of this overlay zone is necessary. The zone currently gives deference to the property owner of these parcels with an industrial overlay to decide when and whether to redevelop their properties in a manner that would remove the industrial structure and use, replacing it with an allowable use and conforming to the design standards of the TZC. Eliminating the I-OZ Zone will cause these properties to become nonconforming as to use and structure, subjecting them to the regulations as amended and added to Section 41-2002, including discontinuance of nonconforming use or structure though amortization. Section 41-2004 has been deleted in its entirety with the section number reserved. •Zones Established and Uses Permitted – Amendments to Sections 41-2006 and 41- 2007, respectively, include parallel deletion of the I-OZ Zone affecting the Regulating Plan (TZC zoning map) and the corresponding Use Standards tables regulating the land use and permit types for each of the remaining zones of the TZC. Table 2A categorizes land uses into broad subheadings for both residential and nonresidential land uses. The nonresidential land uses are further categorized into commercial- oriented versus industrial-oriented types of uses. The amendments will eliminate the Small-Scale Industry sub-category altogether, since the majority of these uses are industrial uses incompatible with residential uses. The purpose of the TZC is to promote transit-oriented mixed-use development, which pairs residential and nonresidential land uses either horizontally or vertically on a site or within a building. Compatibility of allowable land use types is critical, particularly given the history of the negative impacts from industrial uses remaining in the area and in close proximity to existing and new residential areas. Amending this Section also replaces the TZC zoning map figure to ensure consistency with the City’s Official Zoning Map and     City Council 22 – 14 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 15 4 9 1 1 General Plan Land Use Map in accordance with requirements of State law, Government Code Section 65860. •Operational Standards for Permitted Uses and Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses – Section 41-2008 contains operational standards applicable to all uses within the TZC boundary. This Section is largely unchanged, with clarification and strengthening of certain regulations to address any possible industrial type function of an allowable land use type as listed in the tables of Section 41-2007. These amendments affected any possible manufacturing related activities, sound, screening walls, and eliminated any vehicular service on Sundays. Section 41-2009 establishes new regulations governing existing industrial uses made nonconforming with the removal of the I-OZ Zone within the TZC, and include general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. The amendments to Section 41-2008 and creation of new regulations under Section 41- 2009 ensure that existing nonconforming uses comply with very specific operational standards and/or face amortization that leads ultimately to discontinuance of use, effectively reestablishing the TZC area with residential uses and allowing certain nonresidential uses compatible to such residential and/or mixed-use development. Profile of Industrial Businesses Affected with Proposed Regulations The TZC area is characterized by a diverse mix of approximately 127 industrial businesses. These businesses range from automotive services (the most common industry type) and manufacturing to warehousing and recycling centers. Data compiled from city and external regulatory agencies, including CalEPA, SCAQMD, and CERS, reveal that these businesses operate under various permits related to hazardous materials, air quality, and water quality. Key business characteristics include the storage and use of hazardous materials such as motor oil, solvents, and various chemicals, as well as the operation of equipment like emergency generators and internal combustion engines. Notably, several businesses, particularly those engaged in manufacturing (spray booths, metal processing) and chemical storage, handle substances like xylene, resins, mineral oils, and acids, posing potential risks related to air and water contamination, as well as fire and health hazards. Heavier industrial operators, such as open air recycling and sorting facilities in the TZC have been creating a range of issues in the neighborhood. Issues range from: 1) air pollution – dust and participate matter from the sorting process that can become airborne, leading to respiratory problems and reduced air quality, VOCs released from decomposing materials, and odors; 2) water pollution from stormwater runoff that can carry contaminants, including debris, chemicals, or bacteria, from a facility to nearby waterways; 3) noise pollution from heavy machinery, trucks, and sorting equipment generating noise; and 4) visual blight from the constant movement of trucks and equipment and from the piles of trash, debris, and recycling materials that detract from the aesthetic appeal of the community. The secondary effects affect residents’ quality of life with increased traffic hazards and living next to these heavier industrial uses and the risks being exposed to these issues on a daily basis.    City Council 22 – 15 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 16 4 9 1 1 Planning Commission Public Hearing – February 24, 2025 On February 24, 2025, the Santa Ana Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider recommending ZOA No. 2024-02, AA No. 2024-03, and resolution to make findings and adopt Addendum to TZC SD-84 Final EIR. Upon hearing all testimony, the Commission closed the public hearing, held discussion, provided direction to staff, and continued the item to a special meeting scheduled for March 6, 2025. The Commission requested that staff conduct and provide certain deliverables for their further consideration of the proposed amendments, in order to render a recommendation to the City Council on the proposed TZC amendments. The three requested actions for staff were as follows: 1) Conduct an additional community meeting collectively, with interested parties in attendance at the hearing, including residents, businesses, and property owners, to facilitate further input on the proposed amendments; 2) Prepare a financial analysis to address potential impacts to the City as a result of adopting the proposed amendments; and 3) Provide a legal briefing related to potential challenges that may result from adoption of the proposed amendments. Additional Community Meeting – March 3, 2025 Staff held a community meeting with interested parties, including business owners, property owners, residents, and others, on Monday, March 3, 2025, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) First Floor Conference Room (1000 E. Santa Ana Blvd.) to garner additional feedback about the proposed changes. The summary of the March 3, 2025 TZC (SD-84) Community Meeting can be found in Exhibit 1 of Exhibit 7 (March 6, 2025 Special Planning Commission Supplemental Staff Report and Exhibits), which is attached to this staff report. As a result of the input received at that community meeting, combined with the prior analysis of the proposed amendments as outlined in the February 24, 2025, Planning Commission staff report, staff proposed clarifying edits as well as text edits to the Ordinance presented to the Planning Commission on February 24, 2025 that can be found in Exhibit 7. Specifically, the clarifications address typographical errors as well as the emergent themes from the March 3rd community meeting related to hours of operation and clarifying that nonconforming and “legal” nonconforming are one and the same term for the purposes of implementing the TZC. The summary of the March 3, 2025 TZC (SD- 84) Community Meeting can be found in Exhibit 1 of Exhibit 7 (March 6, 2025 Special Planning Commission Supplemental Staff Report and Exhibits), which is attached to this staff report.     City Council 22 – 16 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 17 4 9 1 1 Financial Information related to adoption of proposed TZC (SD-84) amendments The Planning Commission requested City staff to provide financial information specifically on the amendments’ effects on City revenues that would result from the proposed ordinance. Staff from the City’s Finance and Management Services Agency evaluated aggregate financial information using data sources for the City’s tax base that include sales tax, property tax, businesses license tax, and utility users’ tax within the TZC. Staff provided information as part of City staff’s presentation during the scheduled March 6, 2025, meeting and emphasized that due to confidentiality requirements, revenue details provided are in general and aggregate form, preventing the disclosure of individual business revenue. Furthermore, evaluating the actual fiscal impact would be speculative and may vary significantly due to numerous unpredictable factors, including the fact the proposed ordinance does not propose the closure of any business; rendering business uses legal nonconforming does not preclude the establishment of a new, similar business in the same location that may result in no change to the City’s revenues; fluctuations in economic conditions; and potential changes in business operations. These factors were presented to the Planning Commission, which took the information into account in making its recommendation to approve to the City Council. A description of the requested financial information is included in Exhibit 7 (March 6, 2025 Special Planning Commission Supplemental Staff Report and Exhibits), which is attached to this staff report. Legal Analysis The Commission requested that the City Attorney provide a briefing related to legal challenges to the proposed TZC amendments, specifically the creation of nonconforming status to business and structures, and the general argument of a “taking,” as that term is used legally. The City Attorney’s Office provided a confidential memorandum separately to the Planning Commission summarizing these legal questions. Due to the potential for litigation, the information contained in the memorandum is considered client privileged and confidential. Recommended Action Taken by the Planning Commission – March 6, 2025 At a special meeting on March 6, 2025, the Planning Commission voted 4:2:1, with Commissioners Benninger and Leo dissenting and Vice-Chair Ramos absent (due to advisement of a potential conflict of interest due to her residence being in close proximity to the project area), to recommend that the City Council approve the recommended actions. As part of its recommendation to approve, the Planning Commission included clarifying edits to the draft ZOA proposed by staff, which have been incorporated into the proposed text amendments.     City Council 22 – 17 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 18 4 9 1 1 General Plan Consistency The proposed zoning ordinance amendments are consistent with various goals and policies of the Santa Ana General Plan, including the Land Use, Community, Economic Prosperity, and Conservation elements. Consistency with the General Plan is required by Government Code Section 65860, by timely addressing current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be inconsistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: •Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life; •Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; •Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses; •Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; •Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC; •Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit increased pollution new sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; •Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and •Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area.     City Council 22 – 18 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 19 4 9 1 1 Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional, and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. Santa Ana’s current General Plan champions implementation policies, including 77 EJ actions that address air quality, noxious uses, water safety, residential lead exposure in the soil, and other environmental public health conditions. The proposed TZC amendments align with both the General Plan's EJ policies and the original land use designations applicable to the area since the adoption of the TZC in 2010.     City Council 22 – 19 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 20 4 9 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies and local governments to measure the environmental impacts of development projects or other major land use decisions, and to limit or avoid those impacts if possible. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states the following with respect to an Addendum to an EIR: a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. Additionally, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, states the following with respect to a Subsequent EIRs: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A)The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;     City Council 22 – 20 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 21 4 9 1 1 (B)Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C)Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D)Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03 are considered a project as defined by the CEQA. The City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that it is subject to CEQA guidelines and regulations (Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21000-21177). An Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearing House (SCH) No. 2006071100) has been prepared by the City. Based on its independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, and, in exercising its independent judgement, hereby finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required for the proposed project; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR is required for the adoption of the Ordinances. Specifically, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City finds on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that: (1) no substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified as complete, that shows any of the following: (A) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (B) significant effect previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (C) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) mitigation measures or alternative which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.    City Council 22 – 21 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) April 1, 2025 Page 22 4 9 1 1 Additionally, as detailed in the General Plan Consistency subsection of this report, the proposed Ordinances are consistent with numerous General Plan goals and policies that were evaluated as part of the General Plan Update Program EIR. The proposed Ordinances also satisfy and further implementation actions of the General Plan Update. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Resolution of the City Council and Addendum to the TZC EIR 2. Ordinance for Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 3. Ordinance for Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 4. Environmental Health Data and Reports 5. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 6. February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report and Exhibits 7. March 6, 2025 Special Planning Commission Supplemental Staff Report and 8. Exhibits 9. City Council Staff Report and Exhibits for the Adopted TZC Moratorium 10.Copy of Public Hearing Notice Submitted By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Acting Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager     City Council 22 – 22 4/1/2025 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) WHEREAS , at a duly noticed public hearing held on June 7, 2010, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana (“City Council”) adopted findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and certified the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100, “Transit Zoning Code EIR”), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations, §§15000, et seq., “CEQA Guidelines”) and adopted the City of Santa Ana’s Transit Zoning Code (“Transit Zoning Code”), which is designed to provide the zoning necessary to support the long-term development of a successful transit program; and WHEREAS, after continued research and study, two ordinances have been developed that address the impacts from industrial land uses in the Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84) Zoning District, also known as the Transit Zoning Code: (1) Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 to amend certain provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and amend portions of the Transit Zoning Code, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amendment of non -conforming regulations; and (2) Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to remove the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an EIR has been certified, the lead agency is required to review any changed circumstances to determine whether any of the circumstances under Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162 require additional environmental review; and WHEREAS, the City has evaluated the proposed ordinances to the Transit Zoning Code in light of the standards for subsequent environmental review outlined in Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162, and concluded that the proposed changes would not result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects that were previously disclosed in the Transit Zoning Code EIR, and therefore no subsequent EIR or mitigated negative declaration is required; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes would nonetheless necessitate minor changes or additions to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and, thus, the City has prepared an Addendum for the Transit Zoning Code EIR (“Addendum”), attached as Exhibit 1, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15164 to address the proposed ordinances; and Exhibit 1 - Resolution of the City Council and Addendum to the TZC EIR     City Council 22 – 23 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, the Addendum was prepared in full compliance with CEQA, CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subdivision (c) does not require the Addendum to be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to a final EIR or adopted negative declaration; and WHEREAS, under CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and as referenced below, the "project" shall mean the proposed ordinances under the Transit Zoning Code including implementation of these ordinances; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider these proposed ordinances, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and after closing the public hearing, continued taking any action on this Ordinance to a special meeting held on March 6, 2025, whereby the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinances to the City Council; WHEREAS, on April 1, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider these proposed ordinances, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS the City Council considered the entire administrative record, including the staff report (and all attachments thereto), the Transit Zoning Code EIR and Addendum, and oral and written testimony from interested persons; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are true and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 requires lead agencies to prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some chan ges or additions to the project are necessary, but none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR are present. The City Council has reviewed and considered the administrative record, including but not limited to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and the Addendum, which are all incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein, and finds that those documents taken together contain a complete and accurate reporting of all the environmental impacts associated with the Transit Zoning Code. The City Council further finds that the Addendum and the administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds and determines that the Addendum reflects the City ’s independent judgment. The City Council finds that the foregoing is supported by substantial evidence in the record.     City Council 22 – 24 4/1/2025 Furthermore, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an EIR has been certified, the City is re quired to review any changed circumstances under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 to determine whether additional environmental review is required. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the administrative record, including but not limited to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and the Addendum, the City Council finds that none of the conditions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred because the proposed ordinances: a) do not constitute substantial changes that would require major revisions to the Transit Zoning Code EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; and b) do not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project was developed that would require major revisions of the Transit Zoning Code EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; and c) do not present new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Transit Zoning Code was certified, showing any of the following: (i) that the project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those previously analyzed would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. Pursuant to CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, the City Council hereby adopts the foregoing findings and adopts the Addendum attached as Exhibit 1. City Council further directs City staff to cause a Notice of Determination to be filed and posted with the County of Orange Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse within five working days of the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. Section 4. The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Santa Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The     City Council 22 – 25 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6. Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certif y the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 2025 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: ABSTENTIONS: Councilmembers: _______________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:________________________ Melissa M. Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2025-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on April 1, 2025. Date: ________________ ____________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana     City Council 22 – 26 4/1/2025     City Council 22 – 27 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 1 ADDENDUM     City Council 22 – 28 4/1/2025 ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH NO. 2006071100 City of Santa Ana Amendment to Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development No. 84 Prepared For: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, California 92701 Prepared By: MIG, Inc. 1650 Spruce Street, Suite 106 Riverside, California 92507 January 2025     City Council 22 – 29 4/1/2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE......................................................................1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose...................................................................................................1 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements...............................................................................1 1.3 Incorporation by Reference ...............................................................................................2 SECTION 2.0 – BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................3 SECTION 3.0 – DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT.......................................................6 SECTION 4.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING..…..…………………………….............................9 SECTION 5.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS........................................................................12 5.1 Aesthetics/Visual Resources ...........................................................................................13 5.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................16 5.3 Biological Resources .......................................................................................................22 5.4 Cultural Resources ..........................................................................................................24 5.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ..................................................................................27 5.6 Hydrology and Water Quality...........................................................................................31 5.7 Land Use………...............................................................................................................34 5.8 Noise................................................................................................................................36 5.9 Population, Housing and Employment.............................................................................39 5.10 Public Services ................................................................................................................40 5.11 Transportation..................................................................................................................42 5.12 Utilities and Service Systems ..........................................................................................46 5.13 Global Climate Change....................................................................................................48 5.14 Mandatory Findings of Significance.................................................................................51 5.20 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................52 FIGURES Figure 1: Transit Zoning Code Area..............................................................................................4 Figure 2: Transit Zoning Code Zoning Designations.....................................................................5 Figure 3: Regional Location.........................................................................................................10 Figure 4: Citywide Aerial..............................................................................................................11 TABLES Table 1 - Current and Proposed Text Regulations........................................................................6     City Council 22 – 30 4/1/2025 January 2025 1 Environmental Analysis 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Purpose On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (or “SD 84A and 84B”) through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD84 Zoning District. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Based upon the City Council’s actions and direction enacting the moratorium combined with the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03. The proposed amendments (“proposed amendments” or “project”) will modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process for industrial uses; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Refer to Section 3.2 – Project Description. Following preliminary review of proposed ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03 amendments, the City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that the project is subject to CEQA (Public Resources Code (PRC) §§21000-21177; 14 CCR §§15000, et seq.). This Addendum to Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and 84B) Environmental Impact Report (“TZC EIR”) (SCH No. 2006071100) has been prepared to demonstrate that, pursuant to the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, this project is within the scope of the TZC EIR. As a result, the City does not need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR as the TZC EIR fully analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed amendments. This is consistent with Section 8.06 of the City’s Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states the following with respect to an Addendum to an EIR: a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.     City Council 22 – 31 4/1/2025 January 2025 2 Environmental Analysis d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, states the following with respect to a Subsequent EIRs: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. 1.3 Incorporation by Reference The TZC Final EIR, including the original Draft EIR (DEIR), and has been made available for public review at the Lead Agency office (City of Santa Ana). The Final EIR is incorporated into this Addendum by reference.     City Council 22 – 32 4/1/2025 January 2025 3 Environmental Analysis This Addendum is available for public inspection at the City at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA, and on the City’s website at https://www.santa-ana.org/environmental-impact-report- transit-zoning-code/. 2.0 BACKGROUND The TZC was established in June 2010, which is located in the area west of Interstate 5, north of First Street, and between Grand Avenue and Flower Street, and south of Civic Center Drive in the City of Santa Ana. The TZC provided new zoning for all of the properties contained within its boundary. However, some properties with existing M1 and M2 zoning and/or existing industrial businesses also received an overlay district designation which allowed for the continuation of industrial land uses on those properties and allows for the option of future mixed- use development to be exercised at the discretion of the property owner. The purpose was to establish a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. On June 7, 2010, the City adopted the TZC and certified the TZC Final EIR (SCH No. 2006071100). The TZC Final EIR provides a program-level and project-level analysis of the environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the TZC. The majority of the analysis is done at the program level; however, a project-level analysis is provided for the development proposal to demolish 30,000 square feet of existing structures on eleven Redevelopment Agency-owned parcels and to construct 220 affordable residential units. The TZC Final EIR concluded full implementation of the TZC would result in significant and unavoidable impacts with respect to the following: aesthetics, air quality, cultural resources, noise, transportation, and climate change. The TZC Final EIR’s background and environmental impact conclusions are cited throughout this Addendum. In July 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2970, amending the Transit Zoning Code to modify certain design criteria regarding height, massing, open space location, driveway standards, lot dimensions, and parking alternatives, and determined that this ordinance was exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, section 15061(b)(3). This amendment did not include changes to land uses or permit types within the TZC. In support of the TZC amendment, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. Refer to Figure 1 – Existing Transit Zoning Code area and Figure 2 Transit Zoning Code Designations, below. However, due to the continued application of the industrial overlay zones within the TZC, implementation of the new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts with the new General Plan.     City Council 22 – 33 4/1/2025 January 2025 4 Environmental Analysis Figure 1 – Transit Zoning Code Area     City Council 22 – 34 4/1/2025 January 2025 5 Environmental Analysis Figure 2 – Existing Transit Zoning Code Designations     City Council 22 – 35 4/1/2025 January 2025 6 Environmental Analysis 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types, including the following: •Deletion of industrial land uses •Amend nonconforming regulations, including the addition of an amortization process •Amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses •Delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps •Delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map Implementation of the proposed amendments do not include nor require implementation of any site-specific development projects. Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations, below lists the proposed amendments and is followed by a summary of each. Figure 2.5 Proposed Transit Zoning Code Designations depicts the removal of I-OZ from the map. Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Application of Article SAMC Section 41-2001 establishes the land uses and standards applicable to the TZC - primarily for new uses. The update to text of this Section clarifies that the regulations apply to existing uses, whether conforming or nonconforming, change in land use or tenancy requiring issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Organization SAMC Section 41-2001.5 establishes the contents and organization of the TZC regulations The update to the text is necessary to encompass the new Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses). Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses SAMC Section 41-2002 establishes the regulations for nonconforming buildings, structures or uses within the TZC boundary. The provisions contain minimal limits for rehabilitation of buildings and structures and their expansion for both residential and non- residential uses. The update to text of this Section will further limit some rehabilitation of buildings and structures, with specific emphasis on nonconforming industrial uses. These updated provisions include: • Requiring rehabilitation or expansion of buildings and structures, occupied by any nonconforming use to comply with the new operational standards contained in Section 41-2009. • Prohibits expansion of a building or structure occupied by a nonconforming industrial use. • Discontinuation of nonconforming     City Council 22 – 36 4/1/2025 January 2025 7 Environmental Analysis Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations noxious uses through amortization. • Elimination of certain nonconforming uses and structures • Establishes a process for enacting amortization periods for eliminating certain nonconforming uses. • References to SAMC and State law for abatement of public nuisances. • Establishes authority for voluntary compliance agreements between the City and nonconforming uses. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone SAMC Section 41-2004 establishes an overlay zone applied to M1 and M2 zoned properties located within the TZC boundary. Section 41-2004 is deleted in its entirety, removing the I-OZ Zone from the TZC to eliminate industrial land use type zoning altogether. Application for Discretionary Approvals SAMC Section 41-2005 establishes the process and timing of vesting for certain uses approved with a discretionary permit. Section 41-2005 is renumbered as 41- 2004, and the update to the text of this Section adds clarification for effects of the amendments to the TZC dependent upon status of an application in the City process of review, approval, and/or building permit issuance, if required. Zones Established SAMC Section 41-2006 contains the regulations for zoning districts, land uses, and permit types within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section deletes the I-OZ Zone, including replacing Figure 2.1, the Regulating Plan (map) with a new Figure 2.1 removing the I-OZ Zone designation from all parcels within the TZC boundary. Uses Permitted SAMC Section 41-2007 provides the allowable land uses and permit types required to establish a land use by each zoning district within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section clarifies application of the use standards by zoning district as follows: • Modifies Table 2A containing the Use Standards by adding and reclassifying certain land use types appropriate to the TZC land use subcategories • Deletes certain land use types that are inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the TZC, including the deletion of the Small-Scale Industry land use subcategory in its entirety. Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-2008 primarily regulates new uses within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section further limits certain operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses SAMC Section 41-2009 is an entirely new set of regulations specific to existing nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC. The new Section establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. The regulations cover general standards,     City Council 22 – 37 4/1/2025 January 2025 8 Environmental Analysis Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. Definitions SAMC Section 41-2080 contains the definitions applicable to terms and land uses of the TZC. The update to the text of this Section provides clarification for certain land use types (artisan/craft product with limited on-site production, commercial recreation facility – indoor, and research and development), adds definitions for land use types (business support services, pet day care facility and trade school, nonconforming industrial, and noxious use), and deletes corresponding definitions for land use types that were deleted as part of the amendments to SAMC Section 41-2006. Source: Planning Commission Staff Report     City Council 22 – 38 4/1/2025 January 2025 9 Environmental Analysis Figure 2.5 – Proposed Transit Zoning Code Designations     City Council 22 – 39 4/1/2025 January 2025 10 Environmental Analysis Analysis of the Amendments The proposed amendments to the Sections of the TZC under the topic headings of Application of Article, Organization, Application for Discretionary Approvals, and Definitions are largely to ensure internal consistency related to the more substantive changes being proposed for the TZC to address irreconcilable land use conflicts, described as follows: • Nonconforming Structures and Uses - Section 41-2002 regulates the nonconforming building, structure or use specifically within the TZC. The regulations are unique to the TZC and do not apply citywide. The regulations determine under certain circumstances when a nonconforming structure or use can rehabilitate both structural or nonstructural; or expand conditions that would allow expansion. Due to the concerns enumerated within this report related to nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC, the amendments to this section increasingly limit rehabilitation of structures to those types of improvements that address compliance with the new Section 41-2009 operational standards for nonconforming industrial uses; and disallow the expansion of any nonconforming industrial use. This Section also includes new provisions to establish a process for the discontinuance of nonconforming uses, specifically noxious uses, and the elimination of those uses or structures through an amortization hearing process. The tools that these new regulations provide are necessary to address the environmental impacts that lead to the adoption of the Moratorium, provide the framework to initiate the process to eliminate noxious industrial land uses from the TZC, and align with the adopted EJ policies of the General Plan. • The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone – Section 41-2004 created an “exception” zone for properties within the TZC that contained M1 or M2 industrial zoning, uses and structures, when the TZC was adopted in 2010. In order to be both consistent and to promulgate the General Plan land use designations within the TZC, the removal of this overlay zone is necessary. The zone currently gives deference to the property owner of these parcels with an industrial overlay to decide when and whether to redevelop their properties in a manner that would remove the industrial structure and use, replacing it with an allowable use and conforming to the design standards of the TZC. Eliminating the I-OZ Zone will cause these properties to become nonconforming as to use and structure, subjecting them to the regulations as amended and added to Section 41-2002, including discontinuance of nonconforming use or structure though amortization. With the deletion of the entirety of the text of Section 41-2004, Section 41-2005 Application for Discretionary Approvals is renumbered as Section 41-2004. • Zones Established and Uses Permitted – Amendments to Sections 41-2006 and 41- 2007, respectively, include parallel deletion of the I-OZ Zone affecting the Regulating Plan (TZC zoning map) and the corresponding Use Standards tables regulating the land use and permit types for each of the remaining zones of the TZC. Table 2A categorizes land uses into broad subheadings for both residential and nonresidential land uses. The nonresidential land uses are further categorized into commercial-oriented versus industrial-oriented types of uses. The amendments will eliminate the Small-Scale Industry sub-category altogether, since the majority of these uses are industrial uses incompatible with residential uses. The purpose of the TZC is to promote transit-oriented mixed-use development, which pairs residential and nonresidential land uses either horizontally or vertically on a site or within a building. Compatibility of allowable land use types is critical, particularly given the history of the negative impacts from industrial uses remaining in the area and in close proximity to existing and new residential areas. Amending this Section also replaces the TZC zoning map figure to ensure consistency with the City’s Official Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Map in accordance with requirements of State law, Government Code Section 65860.     City Council 22 – 40 4/1/2025 January 2025 11 Environmental Analysis • Operational Standards and Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses – Section 41-2008 contains operational standards applicable to all uses within the TZC boundary. This Section is largely unchanged, with clarification and strengthening of certain regulations to address any possible industrial type function of an allowable land use type as listed in the tables of Section 41-2007. These amendments affected any possible manufacturing related activities, sound, screening walls and eliminated any vehicular service on Sundays. Section 41-2009 establishes new regulations governing existing industrial uses made nonconforming with the removal of the I-OZ Zone within the TZC, and include general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. The amendments to Section 41-2008 and creation of new regulations under Section 41-2009 ensure that existing nonconforming uses comply with very specific operational standards and/or face amortization that leads ultimately to discontinuance of use, effectively reestablishing the TZC area with residential uses and allowing certain nonresidential uses compatible to such residential and/or mixed-use development. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The City of Santa Ana is located in Orange County and serves as the County seat. The City is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the City of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of the City of Newport Beach (refer to Figure 3, Regional Location). As shown in Figure 4, Citywide Aerial, the City is bordered by the City of Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, the City of Tustin to the east, the cities of Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and the cities of Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. The TZC area is shown in blue on both Figure 3 and Figure 4, and a detailed view is shown on Figure 1 in Section 2.0.     City Council 22 – 41 4/1/2025 January 2025 12 Environmental Analysis Figure 3 – Regional Location     City Council 22 – 42 4/1/2025 January 2025 13 Environmental Analysis Figure 4 – Citywide Aerial     City Council 22 – 43 4/1/2025 January 2025 14 Environmental Analysis At the local level, the TZC area is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres, and is generally bounded by I-5 to the north and east, First Street to the south, and Flower Street to the west. Refer to Figure 1 in the Background section. The majority of the City is urbanized, with residential and nonresidential development, and mobility and public facilities all contributing to Santa Ana’s existing built environment. The City’s incorporated boundaries encompass approximately 27.4 square miles. Residential land uses occupy almost 40 percent of the land within the current City boundaries, accounting for 5,226 acres. Other predominant land uses include commercial (1,588 acres) and industrial (1,628 acres). While Santa Ana is a densely populated urban center with one of the most diverse international populations in Orange County, it can generally be characterized as a City of neighborhoods. Santa Ana has over 65 neighborhoods which are distinguished by their history, architecture, housing types, amenities, and unique character. The Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, also known as the TZC, is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres, and is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. The TZC area includes the Orange County Civic Center consisting of City, County and federal buildings, City, Downtown, the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and are established residential communities. Additional land uses include a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses. The TZC area overlaps portions of two of the City’s five focus areas, which are suited for new growth and development under the GPU: the Grand Avenue Avenue/17th Street Focus Area and the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The Grand Avenue Avenue/17th Street Focus Area is primarily business oriented with office and commercial storefronts and large apartment complexes. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area is characterized as a mix of residential, commercial and industrial. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Initial Study/Notice of Preparation of the DEIR (Appendix A) concluded certain topics to be “Effects Not Found to Be Significant” according to Section 15128 of the CEQA Guidelines as having less than significant or no impacts, and therefore were not included in the Final EIR. Agricultural Resources. The Initial Study concluded that the soils within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area are not candidates for listing as prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance. In addition, no farmland or agricultural activity exists on or in the vicinity of the Transit Zoning Code, and no portion is under a Williamson Act contract. The Initial Study concluded no that no impacts would occur. Geology and Soils. The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is located in an area of minimal geologic hazards. Any development within the project area would be designed in accordance with applicable building code requirements, which account for seismic groundshaking. The Initial Study concluded that no and less than significant impacts to would occur. Mineral Resources. The Initial Study determined that implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in the loss of availability of either a known mineral resource of value to the state or region, or a locally important mineral resource recovery site, because no such sites exist within the project area. The Initial Study concluded that implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in the loss of     City Council 22 – 44 4/1/2025 January 2025 15 Environmental Analysis availability of a locally important mineral resource delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Because the TZC Final EIR was certified in 2010, certain topics that were later added to the state CEQA Guidelines checklist were not included. The Tribal Cultural Resources topic was added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2017. Although added as a separate topic, the TZC DEIR Cultural Resources section did include an evaluation of Native American resources in Section 4.4.1 – Environmental Setting and Section 4.4.2 – Regulatory Framework. Impact 4.4-1 included MM 4.4-1(a) that required construction monitoring by a tribe. The TZC EIR included a Global Climate Change topic, which included greenhouse gas emissions. The Greenhouse Gas Emissions topic was added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2018. Greenhouse Gas Emissions was discussed in Section 4.13.2 – Existing Conditions, Section 4.13.2 – Regulatory Framework, and Section 4.13.4 – Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures. The Energy and Wildfire topics were added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2018. Although added as separate topics, Energy is discussed within Sections 4.12.12 and 4.12.13 of the Utilities and Service Systems topic of the TZC EIR. Wildfire (i.e. wildland fires), is discussed within Section 4.5.3 of the Hazards and Hazardous Materials topic of the TZC EIR. Although these topics were added following certification of the TZC Final EIR, they were discussed and analyzed in the respective sections identified above and do not represent new impacts not previously addressed. Sections 5.1 through 5.13, below, analyzes the potentially significant impacts that could occur as a result of implementing the proposed project through the adoption of the proposed text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations. Each topical section lists impact statements and mitigation measures from the TZC EIR, and provides an analysis and conclusion. Each TZC EIR conclusion includes a reference to the EIR impact statement (ex., Impact 4.1-3) and includes its associated significance finding. 5.1 AESTHETICS/VISUAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to aesthetics and visual resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? e. A project would be considered to create significant shade/shadow impacts if shade/shadow from the project results in a substantial loss of sunlight in a residential area or other sensitive receptor. Other sensitive receptors would include schools and parks.     City Council 22 – 45 4/1/2025 January 2025 16 Environmental Analysis TZC EIR Conclusions •Implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not substantially damage scenic resources within a State scenic highway, and no further analysis is necessary in this EIR. (DEIR Section 4.1.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •Development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would contribute to the image of, and add to the aesthetic quality of the City. As such, development under the proposed project would not degrade the existing visual quality of the area or obstruct key existing views and/or vistas in the vicinity. (Impact 4.1-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Future development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would improve the existing visual character. (Impact 4.1-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code, and associated infrastructure improvements would result in new sources of increased daytime glare. (Impact 4.1-3: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would result in new sources of spillover light. (Impact 4.1-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in a substantial increase in shade/shadows over sensitive uses. (Impact 4.1-5: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR FEIR Mitigation Measures MM4.1-1 Proposed new structures shall be designed to maximize the use of textured or other non-reflective exterior surfaces and non-reflective glass. Building materials shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of building permits for each project. (Impact 4.1-3) MM4.1-2 All exterior lighting and advertising (including signage) shall be directed onto the specific location intended for illumination (e.g., parking lots, driveways, and walkways) and shielded away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way to minimize light spillover onto adjacent areas. (Impact 4.1-4) MM4.1-3 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a specific development project, the applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the City for review and approval. The plan shall specify the lighting type and placement to ensure that the effects of security and other outdoor lighting are minimized on adjacent uses and do not create spillover effects. The plan shall specifically incorporate the following design features: o All projects shall incorporate project design features to shield light and/or glare from vehicles entering or exiting parking lots and structures that face sensitive uses (e.g., schools, hospitals, senior housing, or other residential properties) by providing barriers so that light from vehicle headlights would not illuminate off-site sensitive uses. o All projects shall incorporate project design features to provide landscaping, physical barriers, screening, or other buffers to minimize project-generated illumination from entering off-site areas and to prevent glare or interference with vehicular traffic, in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code. (Impact 4.1-4) MM4.1-4 For any proposed structure that would exceed four stories in height, applicants shall submit a site-specific shade/shadow report with renderings representing the level of     City Council 22 – 46 4/1/2025 January 2025 17 Environmental Analysis shade/shadows associated with the proposed development at the following times: 9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 3:00 P.M. PST for the both the winter and summer solstices. An additional rendering for the 5:00 P.M. PST time period shall be prepared for the summer solstice period. Typically, a variety of criteria are used to determine the significance of a shadow impact, including the following: o Affected land use (criticality of direct sunlight for the use). o Duration (hours per day in shadow); time of day (critical time period for direct sunlight). o Season (time of year use would be shadowed). o Extent (percentage of use that would be shadowed). o Preexisting condition (shadow condition due to existing buildings, landscaping, or other features). o Type (solid or dappled shadow). The report shall include any feasible design considerations that would reduce the extent of shadows cast by a proposed structure. The analysis and the project design plans shall be forwarded to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. (Impact 4.1-5) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that no impacts related to State Scenic Highways would result from implementation of the project because no scenic highways are located within the TZC area. Impacts related to visual and aesthetic quality (Impact 4.1-1) and visual character (Impact 4.1-2) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to daytime glare (Impact 4.1-3) and spillover light (Impact 4.1-4) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Long-term development related shade and shadows (Impact 4.1-5) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make mitigation infeasible. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Implementation of the project through the proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations does not trigger new aesthetic and visual resources impacts requiring preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the project modifies the list of land uses and permit types (refer to Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations) including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the additional of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC area. Thus, there are no new land uses being introduced or different development standards that would have aesthetic or visual resource impacts. In particular, the proposed amendments will establish regulations for nonconforming uses, including light and glare. These regulations and standards will cover general standards, enclosed operations, light, glare, and outdoor storage and screening. No direct or indirect glare or heat, whether from floodlights or from high-temperature processes (including combustion or welding or otherwise) shall be visible or felt at the property line. Lighting must be shielded, boxed, or directed at a downward angle so as to minimize the generation of light and glare and to assure that there is no spillover of light and glare that will impact drivers or pedestrians on the public streets, on site activities, and adjoining or nearby properties. No activity shall be permitted which causes excessive light and glare to be transmitted or reflected to surrounding properties at a level resulting in detrimental impacts to adjacent properties. Light sources shall generally not be permitted in landscaped, buffer, or setback areas except for those illuminating pedestrian walkways. Lighting used to illuminate parking areas shall be designed, located, and installed to be shielded and downlit and to reflect away from any nearby residential areas.     City Council 22 – 47 4/1/2025 January 2025 18 Environmental Analysis Lighting for advertising signs shall not create glare or light which extends to surrounding properties. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures MM4.1-1 through MM4.1-4 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new aesthetics impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more significant impacts to aesthetics and visual resources. 5.2 AIR QUALITY This section analyzes the effects to air quality from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the proposed project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? TZC EIR Conclusions •The project would not create substantial objectionable odors. (Impact 4.2-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •The project would not create short-term quantities of criteria pollutants above the significance thresholds published by SCAQMD. (Impact 4.2-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Operation of the project would increase local traffic volumes, but would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial localized carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations. (Impact 4.2-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •The anticipated population increase of 12,225 new residents as a result of the long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code is consistent with the SCAG growth projections for Santa Ana and, therefore, would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Air Quality Management Plan. (Impact 4.2-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Construction activities associated with the construction of individual projects within the Transit Zoning Code area, including the Developer project, would contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation for criteria air pollutants. (Impact 4.2-5: Significant and Unavoidable with mitigation)     City Council 22 – 48 4/1/2025 January 2025 19 Environmental Analysis •Operation of the proposed project would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District standards for VOC, NOX, CO, and PM10 and would result in a projected air quality violation. (Impact 4.2-6: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) •Construction and operation of the proposed project would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the proposed project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. (Impact 4.2-7: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.2-1 Trash receptacles within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) will be required to have lids that enable convenient collection and loading and will be emptied on a regular basis, in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations for the collection of solid waste. (Impact 4.2-1) MM4.2-2 The construction contractor should ensure that no more than 5 acres per day are actively graded or developed. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-3 The construction contractor should ensure that all active disturbed surfaces should be watered three times per day throughout the construction period. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-4 The construction contractor should ensure that the mass grading, fine grading, and structure construction are conducted at separate time periods and do not overlap with one another. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-5 The construction contractor should ensure that all haul roads are watered three (3) times per day. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-6 The construction contractor should ensure that all traffic on unpaved roads is reduced to 15 mph or less. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-7 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that all diesel-powered equipment used will be retrofitted with after-treatment products (e.g., engine catalysts) to the extent that they are readily available in the South Coast Air Basin. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-8 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that all heavy-duty diesel- powered equipment operating and refueling at the project site use low-NOX diesel fuel to the extent that it is readily available and cost effective (up to 125 percent of the cost of California Air Resources Board diesel) in the South Coast Air Basin (this does not apply to diesel-powered trucks traveling to and from the project site). Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-9 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that alternative fuel construction equipment (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) be utilized to the extent that the equipment is readily available and cost effective in the South Coast Air Basin. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-10 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that construction equipment engines be maintained in good condition and in proper tune per manufacturer’s specification for     City Council 22 – 49 4/1/2025 January 2025 20 Environmental Analysis the duration of construction. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-11 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure surrounding the construction site rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-12 As required by South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403—Fugitive Dust, all construction activities that are capable of generating fugitive dust are required to implement dust control measures during each phase of project development to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air. These measures include the following: o Application of soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas. o Quick replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas. o Watering of exposed surfaces three times daily. o Watering of all unpaved haul roads three times daily. o Covering all stock piles with tarp. o Reduction of vehicle speed on unpaved roads. o Post signs on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. o Sweep streets adjacent to the project site at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads. o Cover or have water applied to the exposed surface of all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. o Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads to wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-13 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes. Diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-14 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction parking be configured to minimize traffic interference during the construction period and, therefore, reduce idling of traffic. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-15 The developer shall require by contract specifications that temporary traffic controls are provided, such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-16 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system by scheduled to off-peak hours (9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.). Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5)     City Council 22 – 50 4/1/2025 January 2025 21 Environmental Analysis MM4.2-17 Upon issuance of building or grading permits, whichever is issued earliest, notification shall be mailed to owners and occupants of all developed land uses within ¼ mile of any project within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) boundaries greater than four stories in height or 25,000 sf in area providing a schedule for major construction activities that will occur through the duration of the construction period. In addition, the notification will include the identification and contact number for a community liaison and designated construction manager that would be available on site to monitor construction activities. The construction manager shall be responsible for complying with all project requirements related to PM10 generation. The construction manager will be located at the on-site construction office during construction hours for the duration of all construction activities. Contract information for the community liaison and construction manager will be located at the construction office, City Hall, the police department, and a sign on site. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-18 The developer shall require by contract specifications that the architectural coating (paint and primer) products used would have a VOC rating of 125 grams per liter or less. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-19 The developer shall require by contract specifications that materials that do not require painting be used during construction to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-20 The developer shall require by contract specifications that pre-painted construction materials be used to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-21 As individual components of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) are implemented, an air quality impact analyses will be completed to determine their independent significance levels. Mitigation is to be incorporated at the individual component level to bring the individual components to less than significant on a site-by-site basis. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-22 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures exceeds current Title 24 requirements (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; The Energy Commission adopted the 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008, and the Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. The 2008 Residential Compliance Manual was adopted by the Commission on December 17, 2008, and the 2008 Non-residential Compliance Manual was adopted January 14, 2009.Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended November 1, 2005; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent, subject to review by the County Building Official. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning Department and Building Official for review and approval prior to issuance of the permit. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the County Building Official prior to certificate of occupancy. Any combination of the following design features may be used to fulfill this mitigation provided that the total increase in efficiency meets or exceeds 20 percent: o Increase in insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging is minimized o Limit air leakage through the structure or within the heating and cooling distribution system to minimize energy consumption o Incorporate dual-paned or other energy efficient windows o Incorporate energy efficient space heating and cooling equipment     City Council 22 – 51 4/1/2025 January 2025 22 Environmental Analysis o Incorporate energy efficient light fixtures o Incorporate energy efficient appliances o Incorporate energy efficient domestic hot water systems o Incorporate solar panels into the electrical system o Incorporate cool roofs/light-colored roofing o Or other measures that will increase the energy efficiency of building envelope in a manner that when combined with the other options listed above exceeds current Title 24 Standards (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended November 1, 2005; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-23 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a landscape plan for the Project that includes shade trees around main buildings, particularly along southern elevations where practical, and will not interfere with loading dock locations or other operational constraints. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-24 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed building or structure designs incorporate exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public areas. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-25 The applicant shall provide education and publicity about reducing waste and available recycling services to future tenants. The education and publicity materials shall be provided to the City for review and approval by the Planning Department. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-26 All showerheads, lavatory faucets, and sink faucets within the residential units shall comply with the California Energy Conservation flow rate standards. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-27 Low-flush toilets shall be installed within all commercial and residential (including Congregate Care) units as specified in California State Health and Safety Code Section 17921.3. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-28 All commercial/industrial/common area irrigation areas shall be capable of being operated by a computerized irrigation system which includes an onsite weather station/ET gage capable of reading current weather data and making automatic adjustments to independent run times for each irrigation valve based on changes in temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, rain, and wind. In addition, the computerized irrigation system shall be equipped with flow-sensing capabilities, thus automatically shutting down the irrigation system in the event of a mainline break or broken head. These features will assist in conserving water, eliminating the potential of slope failure due to mainline breaks, and eliminating over-watering and flooding due to pipe and/or head breaks. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-29 Landscape designers shall ensure that Project landscaping of commercial/industrial/common areas uses drought-tolerant and smog-tolerant trees, shrubs, and groundcover to ensure long-term viability and conserve water and energy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-30 Landscape designers shall ensure that the landscape plan includes drought resistant trees, shrubs, and groundcover within the parking lot and perimeter. (Impact 4.2-6)     City Council 22 – 52 4/1/2025 January 2025 23 Environmental Analysis MM4.2-31 Project designers shall ensure that design features incorporate light-colored roofing materials that will deflect heat away from the building and conserve energy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-32 The Project designers shall ensure that designs include all illumination elements to have controls to allow selective use as an energy conservation measure. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-33 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to promote ride sharing programs such as, but not necessarily including, publishing ride sharing information for all of the tenants, designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a website or message board for coordinating rides. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-34 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-35 Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that all interior building lighting supports the use of compact fluorescent light bulbs or equivalently efficient lighting to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-36 Tenants shall be responsible to ensure that preferential parking spaces are allocated to ultra-low emission vehicles and alternative fueled vehicles to encourage the use of alternative fuels and ultra-low emission vehicles. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-2 through MM4.2-29 would also apply to this impact. (Impact 4.2-7) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to increased local traffic volumes (Impact 5.2-3) and SCAG growth projections (Impact 4.2-4) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to objectionable odors (Impact 4.2-1), criteria pollutants (Impact 4.2- 2), contribute to an air quality violation (Impact 4.2-5) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to exceeding criteria pollutants during operations (Impact 4.2-6) and construction (Impact 4.2-7) were significant and unavoidable, and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the project modifies the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the additional of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC area. Thus, there are no new land uses being introduced that would have air quality impacts. The proposed amendments will introduce new regulations for nonconforming industrial use that would discontinue     City Council 22 – 53 4/1/2025 January 2025 24 Environmental Analysis nonconforming noxious uses, establish screening walls, eliminate vehicle servicing on Sundays. These regulations would reduce dust and lessen air quality emissions. No land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere. Uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emits dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. Sources of air emissions shall comply with all rules established by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40), the California Air Resources Board, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. These regulations will have a beneficial impact to air quality. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to air quality. Mitigation measures MM4.2-1 through MM4.2-36 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new air quality impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to air quality. 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to biological resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? TZC EIR Conclusions •No endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species designated by the USFWS, CDFG, or CNPS are known to occur or expected to occur within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are located in these areas. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact)     City Council 22 – 54 4/1/2025 January 2025 25 Environmental Analysis •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not in proximity to, nor does it contain, wetland habitat or a blueline stream. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) is surrounded by urban uses on all four sides, including two highways, and, therefore, does not function as a wildlife movement corridor. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •Implementation of the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •No conflict with an adopted habitat conservation plan, Orange County NCCP/HCP or other local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan would occur, and there would be no impact. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not result in a potential reduction in nesting opportunities for resident and migratory avian species of special concern. (Impact 4.3-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.3-1 To ensure that avian species of concern, protected migratory species (e.g., MBTA), or raptors species are not injured or disturbed by construction in the vicinity of nesting habitat, the project applicant shall implement the following measures: 1. Tree removal shall be restricted to the period between August 30 and February 15, to the extent feasible, to avoid the breeding season of any migratory species that could be using the area, and to discourage nesting in the vicinity of an upcoming construction area. If it is not feasible to remove trees outside this window then, prior to the beginning of mass grading, including grading for major infrastructure improvements, during the period between February 15 and August 30, all trees within 250 feet of any grading or earthmoving activity shall be surveyed for active nests by a qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to disturbance. If active nests are found, and the site is within 250 feet of potential construction activity, a temporary fence shall be erected, where appropriate, around the tree(s) at a distance of up to 250 feet, depending on the species, from the edge of the canopy to prevent construction disturbance and intrusions on the nest area. The appropriate buffer shall be determined in consultation with the City of Santa Ana Park Naturalist or a designee. 2. No construction vehicles shall be permitted within restricted areas (i.e., protection zones), unless directly related to the management or protection of the legally protected species. 3. If a legally protected species nest is located in a tree designated for removal, the removal shall be deferred until after August 30, or until the adults and young of the year are no longer dependent on the nest site as determined by a qualified biologist. (Impact 4.3-1) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species or associated habitats or wildlife species, riparian habitat and sensitive natural communities, wetlands or blue line streams, wildlife movement corridors, habitat conservation plans, and biological resource policies would not have any impacts. Impacts to avian species were less than significant with implementation of the mitigation measures.     City Council 22 – 55 4/1/2025 January 2025 26 Environmental Analysis The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the TZC area is intended to be developed for urban uses and located in an area that is completely developed for urban uses. Because TZC area is a heavily disturbed and graded area consisting of industrial and residential uses, and the project does not introduce any new types of land use, and instead removes the industrial overlay zone, there will be no impacts to biological resources. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to biological resources. The project does not trigger new biological resource impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. Mitigation measure MM4.3-1 would continue to apply. There would be no new or more significant impacts to biological resources. 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? TZC EIR Conclusions •Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource or disturb human remains. (Impact 4.4-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code has the potential to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature. (Impact 4.4-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •The adoption of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Impact 4.4-3: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.4-1(a) Prior to any earth-disturbing activities (e.g., excavation, trenching, grading) that could encounter undisturbed soils, the project applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to determine if the project could result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines or disturb human remains. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the archaeologist and the     City Council 22 – 56 4/1/2025 January 2025 27 Environmental Analysis City of Santa Ana, an updated records search of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), updated Native American consultation, and a pedestrian survey of the area proposed for development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any archaeological resources within the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on archaeological resources or human remains. The measures shall include, as appropriate, subsurface testing of archaeological resources and/or construction monitoring by a qualified professional and, if necessary, appropriate Native American monitors identified by the applicable tribe (e.g., the Gabrieliño Tongva Nation) and/or the Native American Heritage Commission. The methods shall also include procedures for the unanticipated discovery of human remains, which shall be in accordance with Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City of Santa Ana for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on archaeological resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. Projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils and would therefore not be required to retain an archaeologist shall demonstrate non-disturbance to the City through the appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth-disturbing activities. Projects that would include any earth disturbance (disturbed or undisturbed soils) shall comply with MM4.4-2(b). (Impact 4.4-1) MM4.4-1(b) If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected historical resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity (“midden”), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) are discovered during any project-related earth- disturbing activities (including projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils), all earth- disturbing activity within 100 feet of the find shall be halted and the City of Santa Ana shall be notified. The project applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by the archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-L) form and filed with the SCCIC. (Impact 4.4-1) MM4.4-2(a) Prior to any earth-disturbing activities (e.g., excavation, trenching, grading) that could encounter undisturbed soils, the project applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist to determine if the project could directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the paleontologist and the City of Santa Ana, a paleontology records check and a pedestrian survey of the area proposed for development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies the paleontological sensitivity of the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on paleontological resources or unique geologic features. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on paleontological resources or unique geologic features identified in the technical report or memorandum. Projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils and would therefore not be required to     City Council 22 – 57 4/1/2025 January 2025 28 Environmental Analysis retain a paleontologist shall demonstrate non-disturbance to the City through the appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth-disturbing activities. Projects that would include any earth disturbance (disturbed or undisturbed soils) shall comply with MM4.4- 3(b). (Impact 4.4-2) MM4.4-2(b) Should paleontological resources (i.e., fossil remains) be identified at a particular site during project construction, the construction foreman shall cease construction within 100 feet of the find until a qualified professional can provide an evaluation. Mitigation of resource impacts shall be implemented and funded by the project applicant and shall be conducted as follows: 1. Identify and evaluate paleontological resources by intense field survey where impacts are considered high 2. Assess effects on identified sites 3 Consult with the institutional/academic paleontologists conducting research investigations within the geological formations that are slated to be impacted 4. Obtain comments from the researchers 5. Comply with researchers’ recommendations to address any significant adverse effects where determined by the City to be feasible In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting paleontologist, the City of Santa Ana staff shall determine whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, project design, costs, applicable policies and land use assumptions, and other considerations. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources is carried out. (Impact 4.4-2) MM4.4-3 Prior to development activities that would demolish or otherwise physically affect buildings or structures 50 years old or older or affect their historic setting, the project applicant shall retain a cultural resource professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History to determine if the project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the cultural resource professional and the City of Santa Ana, the appropriate archival research, including, if necessary, an updated records search of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and a pedestrian survey of the proposed development area to determine if any significant historic-period resources would be adversely affected by the proposed development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any historical resources within the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City Santa Ana for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. Such methods could include, but not be limited to, written and photographic recordation of the resource in accordance with the level of Historic American Building Survey (HABS) documentation that is appropriate to the significance (local, state, national) of the resource. (Impact 4.4-3) Project Analysis and Conclusion     City Council 22 – 58 4/1/2025 January 2025 29 Environmental Analysis The City determined that impacts related to archaeological resources (Impact 4.4-1) unique paleontological resources (Impact 4.4-2), and disturbing human remains were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to historical resources (Impact 4.4-3) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. The TZC EIR states that there are 80 designated historic properties that are listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, five that are listed on the California Points of Historical Interest, and one that is listed on the California Historical Landmarks within and adjacent to the TZC area. The TZC area has already been subject to extensive disruption from previous development and may contain artificial fill materials. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required, nor would the project introduce new land uses that would have impact to cultural or tribal cultural resources that could otherwise make the long-term significant and unavoidable historical resource impacts more severe. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a), MM4.4-1(b), MM4.4- 2(a), MM4.2(b), and MM4.4-3 would continue to apply. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to cultural resources. Therefore, the project does not trigger new cultural or tribal cultural resource impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to cultural and tribal cultural resources. 5.5 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS This section analyzes the effects to hazards and hazardous materials from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?     City Council 22 – 59 4/1/2025 January 2025 30 Environmental Analysis f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? TZC EIR Conclusions •A private airstrip/heliport is not known to be located within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, nor is the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area located in close proximity to a private airstrip/heliport. (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is located in a dense urban environment and is surrounded by existing development. There are no wildland areas, nor wildland interface areas located in the vicinity. Consequently, no wildland fires would affect, or be affected by, implementation of the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B). (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could involve the transportation, use, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous materials, such as diesel exhaust. (Impact 4.5-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Construction activities associated with implementation of the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in the release of hazardous materials to the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions. (Impact 4.5- 2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Construction activities associated with the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would result in the handling of hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing school. (Impact 4.5-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) includes sites which are included on a list of hazardous materials sites and as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or environment. (Impact 4.5-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Construction activities associated with the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code could result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. (Impact 4.5-5: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •The Transit Zoning Code could impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan resulting in a significant impact. (Impact 4.5-6: Less Than Significant with mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.5-1 When sites that are listed in the EDR Report initiate project development, the project applicant shall prepare a Phase I ESA for the proposed site. The Phase I ESA shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM E-1527-05 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process” (November 1, 2006). The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify environmental conditions at a proposed project site that may suggest environmental contamination. The Phase I ESA report shall be prepared by a CA EPA     City Council 22 – 60 4/1/2025 January 2025 31 Environmental Analysis Registered Environmental Assessor or similarly qualified individual prior to initiating any construction activities at the site. If recommended in the Phase I ESA, the project sponsor shall undertake (or require the responsible party to undertake) a Phase II ESA soil sampling plan; or if any environmental contamination is identified by the Phase I ESA, the project sponsor shall implement (or require the responsible party to implement) the recommendations of the report to further investigate and to remove any soil contamination. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-2 In the event that previously unknown or unidentified soil and/or groundwater contamination that could present a threat to human health or the environment is encountered during construction in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the contamination shall cease immediately. If contamination is encountered, a Risk Management Plan shall be prepared and implemented that (1) identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk each contaminant would pose to human health and the environment during construction and post-development and (2) describes measures to be taken to protect workers, and the public from exposure to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation, long-term monitoring, post-development maintenance or access limitations, or some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of contamination, if any, appropriate agencies shall be notified (e.g., Santa Ana Fire Department). If needed, a Site Health and Safety Plan that meets Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements shall be prepared and in place prior to commencement of work in any contaminated area. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-3 Prior to the demolition of structures that were constructed before 1980, a thorough investigation shall be completed to determine if asbestos, lead, or PCBs exist on the site. All demolition that could result in the release of lead and/or asbestos must be conducted according to Cal/OSHA standards. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-4 For development of structures that exceed 200 feet in height above ground level at a development site, applicants shall file a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the FAA (FAA Form 7460-1). Following the FAA’s aeronautical evaluation of the project, projects must comply with conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the FAA. Subsequent to the FAA findings, the project shall be reviewed by the ALUC for consistency analysis. (Impact 4.5-5) MM4.5-5 Prior to initiation of construction activities, any development within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) Area shall have a completed traffic control plan, prepared by the project proponent that will be implemented during construction activities. This may include, but is not limited to, the maintenance of at least one unobstructed lane in both directions on surrounding roadways. At any time if only a single lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic signal, signal carriers (i.e., flagpersons), or other appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions. If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer shall provide appropriate signage indicating alternative routes. (Impact 4.5-6) MM4.5-6 The City Public Works Department shall consult with the Santa Ana Police Department and the Santa Ana Fire Department to disclose temporary closures and alternative travel routes in order to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles when construction of future projects would result in temporary land or roadway closures. (Impact 4.5-6) MM4.5-7 The Santa Ana Fire Department, in consultation with other applicable City Departments (e.g., Police), shall update their Emergency Preparedness Plan prior to occupancy     City Council 22 – 61 4/1/2025 January 2025 32 Environmental Analysis of the first project developed under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B), to address the potential for the accidental release of hazardous materials that may be used, stored, and/or transported in association with operation of project implementation. (Impact 4.5-6) MM4.5-8 Project applicants shall submit evacuation plans on a project by project basis that shall be reviewed and approved by the City Police and Fire Departments. (Impact 4.5-6) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to people residing or working in the vicinity of a private airstrip/heliport and wildland areas would have no impact (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact). Impacts related to transportation, storage and disposal of hazardous materials (Impact 4.5-1) and handling of hazardous materials near a school (Impact 4.5-3) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to reasonably upset of hazardous materials into the environment (Impact 4.5-2), hazardous materials sites (Impact 4.5-4), construction safety hazards for people or residing in the TZC area (Impact 4.5-5) and interference with an adopted emergency response plan (Impact 4.5-6) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would require that no material or waste shall be deposited upon a subject parcel in such form or manner that it may be transferred off the parcel by natural causes or forces and that all materials or wastes which might cause fumes or dust, or which constitute a fire hazard, or which may be edible by or otherwise be attractive to rodents or insects shall be stored outdoors only in closed containers. Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in any manner so as to create any fire, explosive or other hazard. All activities involving the use or storage of combustible, explosive, caustic, or otherwise hazardous materials shall comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal safety standards and shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fire and explosion, and adequate firefighting and fire suppression equipment in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations. The burning of waste materials in open fires without written approval of the Fire Department is prohibited. No activities shall be permitted which emit dangerous radioactivity at any point nor shall electrical disturbances which adversely affect the operation of any equipment, other than that of the creator of such disturbances, be allowed. No use, activity or process shall cause electromagnetic interference with normal radio and television reception, or with the function of other electronic equipment beyond the property line of the site in which it is situated. All uses, activities and processes shall comply with applicable Federal Communications Commission regulations. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.5-1 through MM4.5-8 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new hazards and hazardous materials impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts to hazards and hazardous materials are not exacerbated. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to hazards and hazardous materials. 5.6 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section analyzes the effects to hydrology and water quality from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations.     City Council 22 – 62 4/1/2025 January 2025 33 Environmental Analysis Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on or off site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? g. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? h. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? i. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? j. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? TZC EIR Conclusions •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map, and is not within the 100-year or 500- year flood hazard area. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not within the 100-year flood hazard area, (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located in the flood inundation area of the Prado Dam or the Santiago Dam. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not expose people to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow because the project site is not located near a coastal area, large water body, or unstable and exposed hills or slopes. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •Implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would not violate water quality standards, waste discharge, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. (Impact 4.6-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •The majority of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is already developed and because the project area is not used for groundwater recharge, the operation of future development under the proposed project would not interfere     City Council 22 – 63 4/1/2025 January 2025 34 Environmental Analysis substantially with groundwater recharge. (Impact 4.6-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation with mitigation) •Development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could alter the existing drainage pattern of the area and potentially result in erosion and siltation. (Impact 4.6-3: Less Than Significant) •Future development in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could alter the existing drainage pattern and potentially result in increased downstream flooding through the addition of impervious surfaces, or exceeding the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. (Impact 4.6-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.6-1 In order to comply with the current version of the Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP), future development projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area shall prepare Storm Drain Plans, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) conforming to the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or Environmental Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Agency for review and approval. a. A SWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements of each phase of the development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the project is completed. The SWPPP shall include treatment and disposal of all dewatering operation flows, and for nuisance flows during construction. The SWPPP may include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following applicable measures: o Minimum required pavement widths for residential streets needed to comply with all zoning and applicable ordinances o Use permeable materials for private sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, or interior roadway surfaces o Reduce the overall imperviousness associated with parking lots by using pervious materials in spillover parking areas o Direct rooftop runoff to pervious areas and avoid routing rooftop runoff to the roadway or the stormwater conveyance system o Biofilters including vegetated swales and strips o Extended/dry detention basins o Infiltration basin o Infiltration trenches or vaults o Catch basin inserts o Continuous flow deflection/separation systems o Storm drain inserts o Media filtration o Foundation planting o Catch basin screens o Normal flow storage/separation systems o Clarifiers o Filtration systems o Primary waste water treatment systems     City Council 22 – 64 4/1/2025 January 2025 35 Environmental Analysis o Dry Wells o Cistern b. A WQMP shall be prepared, maintained, and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program. The plan shall incorporate water quality measures for all improved phases of the project. (Impact 4.6-1 and Impact 4.6-3) MM4.6-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits for future development projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, applicants shall submit site-specific Hydrology and Hydraulic Studies to the Public Works Department for review and approval. If existing facilities are not adequate to handle runoff that may be generated by the proposed development, then the applicant shall propose feasible remedies to assure that adequate drainage facilities will be available prior to issuance of occupancy permits. The applicant may propose storm drain improvements to be constructed in order to meet project needs. If necessary storm drain upgrades cannot be implemented prior to issuance of occupancy permits, on site detention facilities or other methods acceptable to the City shall be included with new development projects to ensure that post-construction runoff does not exceed pre-development quantities. (Impact 4.6-4) MM4.6-3 During the design of individual projects, applicants shall minimize impervious area by incorporating landscaped areas over substantial portions of a proposed project area. Furthermore, impervious areas shall be directly connected to landscaped areas or bioretention facilities to promote filtration and infiltration of stormwater. (Impact 4.6-4) MM4.6-4 During the design of individual projects, applicants shall control structural source through storm drain stenciling and signage, coverage of trash area to minimize direct precipitation, efficient irrigation to minimize runoff into stormwater conveyance system, slope and channel protection to decrease potentials for erosions of slopes, and use of deep-rooted, drought tolerant plant species for erosion control. (Impact 4.6-4) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to within a 100-year flood hazard area, flood inundation area, inundation from the Prado Dam, a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would have no impacts (DEIR Section 4.6-3). Impacts related to interference with groundwater recharge (Impact 4.5-1), alteration to existing drainage patterns (Impact 4.6-3) and increased downstream flooding (Impact 4.6-4) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of specific development projects, introduce new land uses nor increase the intensity the existing uses. The new regulations would require liquid or solid wastes discharged from future development projects be properly treated and would therefore not pollute or contaminate any water courses or groundwater. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.6-1 through MM4.6-4 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new hydrology and water quality impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Therefore, there would be no new or more severe significant impacts to hydrology and water quality. 5.7 LAND USE     City Council 22 – 65 4/1/2025 January 2025 36 Environmental Analysis This section analyzes the effects on land use from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Introduce new land uses that would result in conflicts of use? b. Physically divide an established community? c. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.? d. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? TZC EIR Conclusions •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located within either a natural community plan or applicable habitat conservation plan. The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area does not contain any critical or sensitive habitat. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in conflicts of use. (Impact 4.7-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not physically divide an established community. (Impact 4.7-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would conflict with the Santa Ana General Plan by adopting standards and land uses not currently allowed within the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area; however, as part of the proposed project, the General Plan would be amended to incorporate the proposed land uses and development standards. (Impact 4.7-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures All impacts were below the level of significance and mitigation measures are not necessary nor recommended. Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to conflicts with a natural community plan or applicable habitat conservation plan would have no impacts (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact). Impacts related to incompatible land uses (Impact 4.7-1), potential to divide an established community (Impact 4.7-2), and conflicts with the Santa Ana General Plan (Impact 4.7-3) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. The proposed zoning ordinance amendments are consistent with various goals and policies of the Santa Ana General Plan, as required by Government Code Section 65860, by timely addressing current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing environmental justice and impacts were found to be less than significant. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current     City Council 22 – 66 4/1/2025 January 2025 37 Environmental Analysis TZC is found to be inconsistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC area. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: •Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles. •Resolving the conflict of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse. •Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses. •Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heave industrial facilities and emission sources. •Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC. •Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit high levels increased pollution near sensitive receptors within EJ (Environmental Justice) area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC. •Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors •Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through discontinuing nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of     City Council 22 – 67 4/1/2025 January 2025 38 Environmental Analysis assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. Implementation of the proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations does not trigger new land use impacts that might otherwise occur with a development project requiring preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR. The new regulations would provide that any nonconforming business that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to, frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints, or is not in good standing with the City, including, but limited to constant service calls or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including business license revocation or terminating utility services or connections. For the purposes of this section, “frequent” is defined as more than one violation, call, or complaint per month during any twelve month period, and “constant service calls” is defined as more than one service call per month during any twelve (12) month period. Thus, the project would not physically divide an established community, or conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Therefore, the project does not trigger new land use impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to land use. 5.8 NOISE This section analyzes the effects to noise from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. Cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?     City Council 22 – 68 4/1/2025 January 2025 39 Environmental Analysis d. Cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? TZC EIR Conclusions •The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport. (DEIR Section 4.8.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) •Construction activities associated with the proposed project would generate noise levels that exceed the noise standards established by the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. (Impact 4.8-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Operation of the proposed project could expose noise-sensitive land uses to noise levels that exceed the standards established by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Impact 4.8-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Operation of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors on or off site to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, (Impact 4.8-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Occupants of the proposed residential units would not be exposed to potentially significant vibration levels. (Impact 4.8-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Physical impact from an increase in ambient noise levels could occur from the construction activities associated with the proposed project, an adverse effect on the nearby residents would not occur. (Impact 4.8-5: Less Than Significant) •No temporary or periodic noise impacts to on- or off-site receptors due to operation of the project. (Impact 4.8-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Operation of the proposed project would not generate increased local traffic volumes that would cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. (Impact 4.8-7: Less Than Significant without mitigation)Operation of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) rail line would potentially expose noise-sensitive land uses located within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area to noise levels that exceed the standards established by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Impact 4.8-8: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) •Construction activities associated with the proposed project would generate or expose persons or structures to excessive groundborne vibration. (Impact 4.8-9: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.8-1 All construction activity within the City shall be conducted in accordance with Section 18-314(e) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-2 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that the following construction best management practices (BMPs) be implemented by contractors to reduce construction noise levels: Two weeks prior to the commencement of construction, notification must be provided to property owners within 300 feet of a project site disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffled according to industry standards and be in good working condition     City Council 22 – 69 4/1/2025 January 2025 40 Environmental Analysis Place noise-generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses, where feasible Schedule high noise-producing activities between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. to minimize disruption on sensitive uses Implement noise attenuation measures, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible Construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent. If the City or the job superintendent receives a complaint, the superintendent shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action taken to the reporting party. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1) MM4.8-3 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that construction staging areas along with the operation of earthmoving equipment within the project area would be located as far away from vibration and noise sensitive sites as possible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-4 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away from residential streets. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-5 When residential uses would be located in areas with noise levels in excess of 60 dBA CNEL (either through conversion of use/structure or new construction), the project applicant shall provide noise barriers around private open space areas, including patios and balconies, as necessary. The height and density of the barriers shall be sufficient to reduce the exterior noise levels within private open space areas to a CNEL of 65 dBA or less. (Impact 4.8-2) MM4.8-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, building plans shall specify the STC rating of windows and doors for all residential land uses. Window and door ratings shall be sufficient to reduce the interior noise level to a CNEL of 45 dBA or less, and shall be determined by a qualified acoustical consultant as part of the final engineering design of the project. (Impact 4.8- 2) MM4.8-7 Each project applicant shall provide proper shielding for all new HVAC systems used by the proposed residential and mixed use buildings to achieve an attenuation of 15 dBA at 50 feet from the equipment. (Impact 4.8-2) MM4.8-8 The City shall provide a written statement to each applicant for projects located within 400 feet of the SCRRA tracks that shall be provided for each residential unit and resident, notifying them of potential noise and vibration issues associated with the railroad tracks, including the following: Notice of Disclosure     City Council 22 – 70 4/1/2025 January 2025 41 Environmental Analysis Each owner’s [or renter’s] interest is subject to the fact that trains operate at different times of the day and night on the railway tracks immediately adjacent to a project site; and that by accepting the conveyance of an interest [or lease agreement] in that project, owner [or renter] accepts all impacts generated by the trains. Posting of Notice of Disclosure in each residential unit. Prior to offering the first residential unit for purchase, lease, or rent, the property owner or developer shall post a copy of the Notice of Disclosure in every unit in a conspicuous location. Also, a copy of the Notice of Disclosure shall be included in all materials distributed for the Project, including but not limited to: the prospectus, informational literature, and residential lease and rental agreements. (Impact 4.8-8) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that no impacts related to the proximity public use airport would not result in impacts would result. Impacts related to exposure of sensitive receptors from excessive groundborne vibration (Impact 4.8-3), potentially significant vibration levels (Impact 4.8-4), ambient noise increase (Impact 4.8-5), periodic noise impacts (Impact 4.8-6), and noise from increased traffic volumes (Impact 4.8-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts from noise levels exceeding City noise standards (Impact 4.8-1) and exposure to noise-sensitive land uses (Impact 4.8-2) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts causing groundborne vibration and development exposure near the Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) rail line (Impact 4.8-8) and construction activities from project implementation (Impact 4.8-9) were found to be significant and unavoidable. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would limit daily operations times and days of week, and maximum noise that could be generated from existing uses. No industrial use shall generate ground vibration perceptible without instruments at any point along the property line of the site except for motor vehicle operations. No vibration shall be produced that is transmitted through the ground and is discernible without the aid of instruments by a reasonable person at the property lines of the site. Vibrations from temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that enter and leave the subject parcel are exempt from this standard. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.8-1 through MM4.8-8 would continue to apply. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. This will result in a beneficial impact. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and unavoidable noise impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.9 POPULATION, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT This section analyzes the effects to population, housing and employment from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project:     City Council 22 – 71 4/1/2025 January 2025 42 Environmental Analysis a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? TZC EIR Conclusions •Implementation of the proposed project would accommodate projected population and housing growth. (Impact 4.9-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Construction of development projects pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could displace existing people or housing. However, this displacement would not necessitate the construction of additional replacement housing elsewhere. (Impact 4.9-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures All impacts were below the level of significance and mitigation measures are not necessary nor recommended. Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to accommodating population and housing growth Impact 4.9-1) and displacement of existing housing (Impact 4.9-2) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require development of housing units. The new regulations would provide architectural standards to any future development that would regulate the manner in which individual parcels and blocks are developed to create diverse and pedestrian-oriented development that would be consistent with the TZC area. In addition, there shall be no increase in the number of dwelling units unless the site on which the structure is located complies with the off-street parking and open space requirements of the SAMC. Therefore, the existing less than significant population, housing and employment impacts would not result in new or different impacts nor would it increase unplanned growth and does not trigger new population and housing impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.10 PUBLIC SERVICES This section analyzes the effects to public services and recreational and park facilities from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental     City Council 22 – 72 4/1/2025 January 2025 43 Environmental Analysis impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection? b. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection? c. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? d. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for library services? e. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for park services? TZC EIR Conclusions •Construction of new projects pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would increase the demand for fire protection services, but it would not require the construction of new or physically altered facilities to accommodate the increased demand or maintain acceptable response times. (Impact 4.10-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Operation of the proposed project would increase the demand for police services, thereby requiring additional staffing, although it would not require the construction of new or physically altered facilities or personnel to accommodate the increased demand. (Impact 4.10-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Construction of new residential units within the project area would generate new students that could require the addition of new classroom facilities, thereby requiring new or physically altered facilities to accommodate additional students in Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) schools. (Impact 4.10-3: Less Than Significant) •Construction of new residential units within the project area would generate new library users that could require the addition of new library facilities. (Impact 4.10-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •All properties identified as having new development potential to be built out pursuant to the provisions of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) these new projects would generate a need for new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. (Impact 4.10-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.10-1 Prior to an issuance of a building permit, individual projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area shall perform a water supply, fire flow test and fire protection     City Council 22 – 73 4/1/2025 January 2025 44 Environmental Analysis system design analysis to ensure that proposed projects are in accordance to meet standard fire protection design requirements. (Impact 4.10-1) MM4.10-2 Any development that would exceed two stories in height shall submit site-specific security plans to the SAPD for review prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.10-2) MM4.10-3 No developer within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) boundaries shall utilize a frequency of 800 MHz, which is reserved for emergency services. (Impact 4.10-2) MM4.10-4 Individual project developers shall pay school impact fees prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. (Impact 4.10-3) MM4.10-5 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a residential development project, or change of use from non-residential to residential within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, project applicants shall pay to the City of Santa Ana the Park Acquisition and Development Fee. (Impact 4.10-5) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to the provision of library services (Impact 4.10-4) and recreation park facilities (Impact 4.10-5) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to fire services (Impact 4.10-1), Police services (Impact 4.10-2) and generation of new school children (Impact 4.10-3) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.10-1 through MM4.10-5 would continue to apply. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to public services. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and public services impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.11 TRANSPORTATION This section analyzes the effects on transportation from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?     City Council 22 – 74 4/1/2025 January 2025 45 Environmental Analysis e. Result in inadequate emergency access? f.Result in inadequate parking capacity g.Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) TZC EIR Conclusions •Operation of the proposed project would result in impacts related to neighborhood traffic in the adjacent residential areas to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.11-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would exceed standards established by the Orange County Transportation Authority within the study area. (Impact 4.11-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Development projects constructed pursuant to the standards contained within the Transit Zoning Code would not result in a change in air traffic patterns. (Impact 4.11-3: Less Than Significant) without mitigation •Development projects constructed pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not increase hazards due to a design future or incompatible uses. (Impact 4.11-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Development projects constructed pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could result in inadequate emergency access. (Impact 4.11-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development under the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would not result in inadequate parking capacity. (Impact 4.11-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •The Transit Zoning Code would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. (Impact 4.11-7: Less Than Significant) •Long-term cumulative development under implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. (Impact 4.11-8: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development under implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would result in impacts related to freeway ramps in the vicinity of the Transit Zoning Code area. (Impact 4.11-9: Less Than Significant with mitigation and Significant and Unavoidable due to a public agency (Caltrans) approval other than the City) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.11-1 The City of Santa Ana shall, during any roadway improvement within the Transit Zoning Code boundaries, evaluate, consider, and implement as appropriate the traffic calming measure(s), including but not limited to the following: o Curb extensions at local intersections o Short medians at entries to wide streets o Traffic circles at oversized intersections o Speed humps o Turn restrictions (Impact 4.11-1) MM4.11-2 As part of the project, the City of Santa Ana and the project sponsors shall work with the transit providers to implement various transit-related measures to improve and expand bus     City Council 22 – 75 4/1/2025 January 2025 46 Environmental Analysis system service within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. These measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: o Adding bus stops to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area along existing roadways o Changing bus service headways to respond to increased demand o Changing bus service destinations to respond to changing demand o Adding local shuttle service for employees and patrons of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area o The details of bus service improvements shall be determined in coordination with OCTA. The following recommendations would help encourage public transit patronage for project-related trips: o Bus Stop Locations—Relocation of existing bus stops and the provision of additional bus stops should be considered to accommodate transit users at convenient locations. o Days of Operation—The City should work with OCTA to consider changes to route times to serve nighttime and weekend project visitors and employees. o Headway—The City should work w would be appropriate to reduce them Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. MM4.11-3 The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency shall monitor the traffic signals within the Transit Zoning Code study area once every five years to ensure that traffic signal timing is optimized. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-4 The City of Santa Ana shall institute a program for systematic mitigation of impacts as development proceeds within the Transit Zoning Code to ensure mitigation of the individual improvements. The program shall prescribe the method of participation in the mitigation program by individual projects and guide the timely implementation of the mitigation measures. The program shall include the following elements: A funding and improvement program should be established to identify financial resources adequate to construct all identified mitigation measures in a timely basis. All properties that redevelop within the Transit Zoning Code should participate in the program on a fair share per new development trip basis. The fair share should be based upon the total cost of all identified mitigation measures, divided by the peak hour trip generation increase forecast. This rate per peak hour trip should be imposed upon the incremental traffic growth for any new development within the Transitioning Code. The program should raise funds from full development of the Transit Zoning Code to fund all identified mitigation measures. The program should monitor phasing development of the Transit Zoning Code and defer or eliminate improvements if the densities permitted in the Transit Zoning Code are not occurring. Program phasing should be monitored through preparation of specific project traffic impact studies for any project that is expected to include more than 100 dwelling units or 100,000 sf of non-residential development. Traffic impact studies should use traffic generation rates that are deemed to be most appropriate for the actual development proposed. Properties within Santa Ana and within one-half mile of the Transit Zoning Code that redevelop to result in higher traffic generation should also participate in the program to insure equity.     City Council 22 – 76 4/1/2025 January 2025 47 Environmental Analysis The City may elect to implement appropriate mitigation measures as a condition of approval of the proposed developments, where appropriate. All or part of the costs of these improvements may be considered to be a negotiated credit toward the program, however the program must be administered in a manner that assures that it can fund necessary improvements to maintain adequate level of service at all intersections within this study. If funding of priority improvements cannot be assured, credit for construction of lower priority improvements may not be assured or may be postponed until more program funds are available. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-5 Main Street at First Street—Install a second northbound and southbound left-turn lanes and a dedicated northbound right-turn lane for 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-6 Lacy Street at Santa Ana Boulevard—Install a traffic signal and provide exclusive left-turn lane for both northbound and southbound directions for both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-7 Lacy Street at First Street—Install a traffic signal for both 2030 and 2035 conditions, a traffic signal, and provide exclusive left-turn lane for both northbound and southbound directions for both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-8 Santiago Street at Washington Avenue—Install a traffic signal and provide one exclusive left-turn lane for both eastbound and westbound traffic for 2035 conditions only. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-9 Santiago Street at Civic Center Drive—Install a traffic signal and provide: one exclusive left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through and right-turn lane on northbound and southbound approaches; and one exclusive left-turn lane and one shared through and right lane on eastbound and westbound approaches. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-10 Santiago Street at Santa Ana Drive—Construct a second southbound left-turn lane for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-11 Santiago Street a Fourth Street—Install a traffic signal. The lane configuration for the signal is recommended as 1 Left, 1 Through, 1 Through+ Right for all approaches. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-12 Standard Street at First Street—Construct third eastbound and westbound shared through-right lanes for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-13 Grand Avenue at Santa Ana Boulevard—Construct a third southbound through lane and eastbound right-turn overlap signal phasing. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-14 Grand Avenue at First Street—Construct a third eastbound shared through/right- turn lane, a third westbound shared through/right-turn lane, and a third northbound through lane with dedicated northbound right-turn lane for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-15 Grand Avenue at I-5 Northbound Ramps—Construct a second westbound right-turn lane and for the I-5 northbound off ramp under both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-16 I-5 at Santa Ana Blvd.—Northbound Off-Ramp—The City of Santa Ana Department of Public Works shall coordinate with Caltrans for the installation of a second ramp lane for the     City Council 22 – 77 4/1/2025 January 2025 48 Environmental Analysis I-5 northbound off ramp. The improvement shall be implemented to mitigate 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-9) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to exceeding standards from the Orange County Transportation Authority (Impact 4.111-2), change in air traffic patterns (Impact 4.11-3), hazards due to a design future or incompatible uses (Impact 4.11-4), inadequate emergency access (Impact 4.11-5), inadequate parking capacity (Impact 4.11-6), and alternative transportation (Impact 4.11-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to neighborhood traffic (Impact 4.11-1) and traffic increases to the existing traffic load (Impact 4.11-8) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to development near freeway ramps (Impacts 4.11-9) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.11-1 through MM4.11-16 would continue to apply. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would provide recharging spaces for electric vehicles. Also, all truck parking areas must be on paved surfaces and the parking, loading or unloading of trucks associated with a business on public streets is prohibited. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. This will result in a beneficial impact to transportation. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and unavoidable transportation impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.12 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This section analyzes the effects to utilities and service systems from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? b. Require new or expanded water entitlements and resources if there are not sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources? TZC EIR Conclusions • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would generate an additional demand for water, but would not require water supplies in excess of existing entitlements and resources or result in the need for new or expanded entitlements. (Impact 4.12-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not require or result in the construction of new or expanded water     City Council 22 – 78 4/1/2025 January 2025 49 Environmental Analysis treatment facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. (Impact 4.12-2: Less Than Significant)without mitigation •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Orange County Sanitation District. (Impact 4.12-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could require the construction of new or expanded wastewater conveyance systems, the construction of which would not cause significant environmental effects. (Impact 4.12-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not increase wastewater generation such that treatment facilities would be inadequate to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. (Impact 4.12-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not generate solid waste that exceeds the permitted capacity of landfills serving the area. (Impact 4.12-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development under the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. (Impact 4.12-7: Less Than Significant without mitigation) •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would increase the demand for electricity and gas, but would not require or result in the construction of new energy production or transmission facilities, the construction of which could cause a significant environmental impact. (Impact 4.12-8: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.12-1 Individual project applicants shall prepare site-specific sewer evaluations, including flow monitoring and modeling, during the project design to determine the adequacy of the existing sewer pipe capacity in the affected project area lines. The evaluation shall be submitted to the City of Santa Ana or OCSD, as appropriate, for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Any recommendations made in the site-specific sewer evaluations shall be incorporated into the design of each individual project. (Impact 4.12-4) MM4.12-2 Individual non-residential project applicants are encouraged to apply for Southern California Edison’s “Savings By Design” program. The program is aimed at generating an overall reduction in energy use through design methods and incentive programs by maintaining a 15% or greater exceedance of Title 24. (Impact 4.12-8) MM4.12-3 Individual development projects within the boundaries of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) shall implement energy conservation measures (such as energy-efficient lighting and microprocessor controlled HVAC equipment) to reduce the demand for electricity and natural gas as part of the project design. The energy conservation measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed, or if current technology becomes obsolete, through replacement and shall be reviewed by the Planning and Building Agency prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.12-8) MM4.12-4 Individual development projects within the boundaries of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) shall implement energy conservation measures (such as energy-efficient lighting and microprocessor controlled HVAC equipment) to reduce the demand for electricity     City Council 22 – 79 4/1/2025 January 2025 50 Environmental Analysis and natural gas as part of the project design. The energy conservation measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed, or if current technology becomes obsolete, through replacement and shall be reviewed by the Planning and Building Agency prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.12-8) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to additional water demand (Impact 4.12-1), expanded water treatment facilities (Impact 4.12-2), exceed wastewater treatment requirements (Impact 4.12-3), increase wastewater generation (Impact 4.12-5), generate solid waste exceeding permitted capacity (Impact 4.12-6), and compliance with applicable federal, state, and local solid waste regulations (Impact 4.12-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to new or expanded wastewater conveyance systems (Impact 4.12- 4) and an increased demand for electricity and gas (Impact 4.12-8) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.12-1 through MM4.12-4 would continue to apply. The new regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would provide any nonconforming business that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to, frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints, or is not in good standing with the City, including, but limited to constant service calls or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including business license revocation or terminating utility services or connections. Also, in addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated which will result in a beneficial impact to utilities and service systems. Therefore, the existing less than significant utilities and service systems impacts would not result in new or different impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.13 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE This section analyzes the effects to global climate change from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas? TZC EIR Conclusions •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code at full build-out would result in significant localized air quality impacts for operational level emissions. As a whole, this impact is significant for operational emissions due to the size of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.13-1: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation)     City Council 22 – 80 4/1/2025 January 2025 51 Environmental Analysis •Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code at full build-out has the potential to conflict with AB 32. The Project as a whole is significant for operational emissions due to the size of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.13-2: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.13-1 All diesel fueled construction equipment shall be classified EPA Tier II or better emission efficiencies. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-2 All construction equipment shall be shut off when not in use and shall not idle for more than five minutes, unless actively engaged in construction activities. MM4.13-3 Queuing of trucks on- and offsite shall be limited to periods when absolutely necessitated by grading or construction activities. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-3 Queuing of trucks on- and offsite shall be limited to periods when absolutely necessitated by grading or construction activities. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-4 All on-road construction trucks and other vehicles greater than 10,000 pounds shall be shut off when not in use and shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-5 To the extent feasible, all diesel- and gasoline-powered construction equipment shall be replaced with equivalent electric equipment. MM4.13-6 Project plans and specifications shall include policies and procedures for the reuse and recycling of construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard). (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-7 Project plans and specifications shall include education for construction workers about reducing waste and using available recycling services. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-8 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures meets or exceeds the most recent Title 24 requirements (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards), subject to review by the City Building Official. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency and Building Official for review and approval prior to issuance of the permit. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to certificate of occupancy. The following design features should be considered by the applicant as a way to achieve Title 24 compliance in excess of the minimum requirement: o Increase in insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging is minimized o Limit air leakage through the structure or within the heating and cooling distribution system to minimize energy consumption o Incorporate dual-paned or other energy efficient windows o Incorporate energy efficient space heating and cooling equipment o Incorporate energy efficient light fixtures o Incorporate energy efficient appliances o Incorporate energy efficient domestic hot water systems o Incorporate solar panels into the electrical system o Incorporate cool roofs/light-colored roofing     City Council 22 – 81 4/1/2025 January 2025 52 Environmental Analysis Or other measures that will increase the energy efficiency of building envelope in a manner that when combined with the other options listed above exceeds current Title 24 Standards (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended September 11, 2008; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-9 Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicants for individual projects shall provide a landscape plan that includes shade trees around main buildings, particularly along southern elevations where practical, and will not interfere with loading dock locations or other operational constraints. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-10 All showerheads, lavatory faucets, and sink faucets within the residential units, and where feasible within non-residential developments, shall comply with the California Energy Conservation flow rate standards. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-11 Low-flush toilets shall be installed within all Congregate Care units as specified in California State Health and Safety Code Section 17921.3. MM4.13-12 Project designers should consider design features to incorporate light-colored roofing materials that will deflect heat away from the building and conserve energy. (Impact 4.3- 1) MM4.13-13 Landscape designers shall ensure that landscaping of common areas for Industrial/Commercial projects uses drought-tolerant and smog-tolerant trees, shrubs, and groundcover to ensure long-term viability and conserve water and energy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-14 Landscape designers shall ensure that the landscape plan for Industrial/Commercial projects includes drought resistant trees, shrubs, and groundcover within the parking lot and perimeter. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-15 Individual project applicants shall ensure that designs for Industrial/Commercial projects include all illumination elements to have controls to allow selective use as an energy conservation measure. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-16 The applicant for Industrial/Commercial projects should promote ride sharing programs such as, but not necessarily including, publishing ride sharing information for all of the tenants, designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a website or message board for coordinating rides. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience pursuant to SAMC Chapter 41 regarding bicycle parking standards and Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Citywide Design Guidelines regarding Bikeway Support Facilities Guidelines. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-17 Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that all Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects’ interior building lighting supports the use of compact fluorescent light bulbs or equivalently efficient lighting to the satisfaction of the Building Official. (Impact 4.3-1)     City Council 22 – 82 4/1/2025 January 2025 53 Environmental Analysis MM4.13-18 Applicants for Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects shall consider providing preferential parking spaces for ultra-low emission vehicles and alternative fueled vehicles to encourage the use of alternative fuels and ultra-low emission vehicles. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-19 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed Multi-family/ Industrial/Commercial uses building or structure designs incorporate exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public/common areas pursuant to the adopted standards. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-20 All common area irrigation areas for Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects shall consider systems that are capable of being operated by a computerized irrigation system which includes an onsite weather station/ET gage capable of reading current weather data and making automatic adjustments to independent run times for each irrigation valve based on changes in temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, rain, and wind. In addition, the computerized irrigation system shall also consider the ability to be equipped with flow-sensing capabilities, thus automatically shutting down the irrigation system in the event of a mainline break or broken head. These features will assist in conserving water, eliminating the potential of slope failure due to mainline breaks, and eliminating over-watering and flooding due to pipe and/or head breaks. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-21 Consideration of installation of solar roofs on homes and businesses to offset the increasing demand for energy and natural gas. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-22 Project applicants shall, where feasible, incorporate passive solar design features into the buildings, which may include roof overhangs or canopies that block summer shade, but that allow winter sun, from penetrating south facing windows. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-23 Use Energy Efficient Roofing Materials. All roofing materials used in commercial/retail buildings at the Mixed-Use Retail Development shall be Energy Star® certified. All roof products shall also be certified to meet American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) high emissivity requirements. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-24 All commercial/industrial projects shall, where feasible, include up to 10% renewable energy sources within the project. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-24 would also apply to this impact. (Impact 4.3-2) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that long-term development related to localized air quality impacts from operational emissions (Impact 4.13-1) and operational emissions due to the size of the TZC area with the potential to conflict with AB 32 (Impact 4.13-2) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project Mitigation measures MM 4.13-1 through MM4.13.24 would continue to apply.     City Council 22 – 83 4/1/2025 January 2025 54 Environmental Analysis The new regulations in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would provide that no land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere and that uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emits dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. This will result in a beneficial impact to climate change/greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the existing significant and unavoidable global climate change impacts would not result in new or different impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.14 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Would the project: a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? As detailed herein, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR is not appropriate for the project because none of the criteria permitting such a document under State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 are met. Project implementation does not include nor require implementation of specific development projects. The majority of the City is urbanized, with residential and nonresidential development, and mobility and public facilities all contributing to Santa Ana’s existing built environment. The proposed text amendments to SAMC Sections 41-2001, 41-2001.5, 41-2002, 41-2004, 41- 2005, 41-2006, 41-2008, 41-2009, and 41-2008 would merely update to clarify that the regulations apply to existing uses, further limit some rehabilitation of existing buildings and structures, clarify the effects of amendments to the TZC, further limit certain existing operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses, and to establish regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial uses. Section 41-2001.5 is updated to encompass new SAMC Section 21-2009, which establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. Section 41-2004 deletes the Overlay I-OZ zone from the text and map. Implementation of these SAMC amendments would not require implementation of any specific developments or direct physical changes to the environment, and therefore would not be in conflict with the GPU and no intensification of land uses would result. The City of Santa Ana, which includes the TZC area, is not within a NCCP/HCP area, and therefore would not conflict with an adopted NCCP/HCP plan. No direct or indirect substantial adverse effects on human beings would occur.     City Council 22 – 84 4/1/2025 January 2025 55 Environmental Analysis 5.15 CONCLUSION This project proposes amendments to the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) by way of ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03. These proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Refer to Section 3.0 – Description of the Proposed Project. This project would not result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in the TZC FEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts have been identified because the project basically limits industrial uses and would not lead to the expansion or intensification of new, expanded or more intensive uses. Therefore, there will be no new or more severe impacts as the result of the implementation of this project, beyond the impacts that have already been analyzed in the TZC FEIR. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decision-making body of the lead agency must consider the whole of the data presented in the TZC FEIR. As outlined in this Addendum analysis, all impacts of the project were fully examined in the TZC FEIR, and the proposed changes do not require substantial changes to the prior-certified EIR or previously adopted mitigation measures. Therefore, the preparation of an Addendum to the existing certified EIR is the appropriate CEQA document to support the City’s consideration of the project, as outlined in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164.     City Council 22 – 85 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 1 of 49 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024-02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has, by separate action taken on April 1, 2025, adopted an Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100), which was certified on June 7, 2010, by the City Council (“Addendum”). The Addendum analyzed the environmental impacts of the actions taken in this Ordinance. Adopting the Addendum satisfied the City Council’s obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) regarding amendments to the Transit Zoning Code and none of the conditions in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines 15162 apply. Thus, no further environmental review is required as adoption of this Ordinance falls within the scope of the adopted Addendum and previously certified EIR. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts the findings contained in the attached Exhibit “A” to this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. Section 41-2001 (Application of Article) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2001. Application of Article (a)The Transit Zoning Code, as authorized by Chapter 41, Article III, Division 26, Section 41-593 et seq., of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), is subject to the standards and regulations contained in this Article for the express purpose of establishing land use regulations and standards. All other applicable chapters, articles, and sections of the SAMC and any other regulations adopted by the City Council shall apply unless expressly stated or superseded by this Article. All terms contained herein shall be defined by the SAMC, unless specifically defined in this Article. Exhibit 2 - Ordinance for Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02     City Council 22 – 86 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 2 of 49 (b) Proposed development, including the construction, reconstruction or structural alteration of a structure, subdivisions, and new and existing land uses, whether conforming or nonconforming, as defined in Section 41-126 of the SAMC, within the specific development area shall comply with all the applicable regulations established by this Article article. (c) The regulations contained in this Article shall also apply to: 1. A change in land use within an existing building; and 2. A change in tenancy within an existing building requiring issuance of a new Certificate of Occupancy.” Section 4. Section 41-2001.5 (Organization) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2001.5 Organization (a) Regulating Plan and Zones Established: Sections 41-2006 through 2008 2009 of this Article defines the zones within the Specific Development (SD) boundaries of SD-84, the parcels included within each zone, and describes, zone by zone, the standards for building placement, design, and use consistent with the permitted uses identified in Table 2A. (b) Use Standards: Table 2A identifies the land use types allowed by the City in each of the zones established by the Regulating Plan. A parcel within the Specific Development (SD-84) boundaries shall be occupied only by land uses identified as allowed within the applicable zone and the type of City approval required by Table 2A. (c) Urban Standards by Zone: Sections 41-2010 through 2015 of this Article regulates the features of buildings that affect the public realm. The urban standards regulate building and parking placement, height, and profile, and vary according to the parcel's zone applied by the Regulating Plan. Standards for items not explicitly described in this section, including but not limited to, walls and fences, mechanical equipment, trash bin enclosures, heliport and helipad, underground utility, installation of dish antennas, loading areas, parking lot design standards, refer to other Sections of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code SAMC and the Citywide Design Guidelines. (d) Architectural Standards: Sections 41-2020 through 2039 regulates the manner in which individual parcels and blocks are developed to create diverse and pedestrian-oriented development, through the use of three main components: (1) Sections 41-2020 through 2032 building types (e.g., duplex, rowhouse, courtyard housing)     City Council 22 – 87 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 3 of 49 (2) Sections 41-2033 through 2039 frontage types (e.g., front yard/porch, stoop, arcade, shopfront) (3) Section 41-2040 (Table 4.3A) architectural styles (e.g., Main Street Commercial, Mission Revival, Art Deco, Folk Victorian, Craftsman, California Contemporary). (e) Sign Standards: Section 41-2050 regulates all signage within the SD boundaries to be consistent with the character described for each zone. (f) Subdivision Guidelines: Establishes guidelines for the creation and maintenance of a finely grained and walkable network of blocks punctuated by integral and varied open spaces. (g) Street Network Concepts: identifies conceptual location and guidelines for the street network. This section provides guidelines for the rights-of-way alignment, and width in plan and section with the corresponding details. (h) Definitions: Sections 41-2080 identifies and defines the terms used in this Code.” Section 5. Section 41-2002 (Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2002. Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses (a) A nonconforming building, structure or use shall comply with Article VI of this Chapter, except as provided below modified as follows: (1) A building or structure that does not conform to the architectural style or story height requirements at the time of the adoption of this Article shall not cause the structure to be non-conforming. (2) A nonconforming building, structure or use shall not be required to conform to current zoning regulations based solely upon a change in ownership of the property, except as otherwise provided in this Article. (3) A sale, lease or other transfer of a property containing a nonconforming building, structure or use does not trigger the loss of nonconforming status, except as otherwise provided in this Article. (24)Sections 41-681.1 through 41-681.4 and 41-683.6 of Article VI of this Chapter shall not apply to this buildings, structures and uses addressed within this Article or building, structures, and uses within SD-84, nor to existing accessory dwelling units (ADUs) permitted by the City of Santa Ana before the amendment to this Article.     City Council 22 – 88 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 4 of 49 (35)Rehabilitation, enlargement or exterior structural alterations of any nonconforming structure or structure occupied by a nonconforming use, except for structures occupied by single family and two-family dwellings, may be rehabilitated made as follows: a. Rehabilitation, limited to structural or non-structural alterations without any building expansion and without any intensification of a nonconforming use, is permitted if: 1. The operational standards contained in sections 41-2008 and 41-2009, as applicable, of this Article are met. 1. 2. All signage on the structure and the site on which it is located is brought into conformity with the signage requirements of this Chapter, as approved by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. 2. 3. All outdoor storage is screened by a solid screen wall not to exceed eight (8) feet in height. Outdoor storage shall not exceed the height of the screen wall. 3. 4. There shall be no increase in the number of dwelling units unless the site on which the structure is located complies with the off-street parking and open space requirements of this Chapter. 4. 5. Architectural massing, features and detailing shall be modified to bring the structure into closer compliance with the architectural standards of this Article code, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. b. Rehabilitation may include expansion of floor area without intensification of the nonconforming use when the total floor area of all expansions occurring in any five-year period does not exceed ten (10) percent of the floor area as it legally existed as permitted and constructed as of April 15, 2025 at the beginning of the five year period, provided that the following standards conditions are met: 1. The existing use is not a nonconforming industrial use. Nonconforming industrial uses may not be expanded. 2. The operational standards contained in Section 41-2008 are met. 1. 3. All signage on the structure and the site on which it is located shall be brought into conformity with the requirements of this chapter Chapter as approved by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. 2. 4. There shall be no loading or unloading of vehicles between the hours of 10 pm and 7 am.     City Council 22 – 89 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 5 of 49 3. 5. All outdoor storage is screened by a solid screen wall not to exceed eight (8) feet in height. Outdoor storage shall not exceed the height of the screen wall. 4. 6. There shall be no enlargement which would intrude into any required setback area required by this Article. 5. 7. There shall be no enlargement which would result in a new nonconforming condition in violation of the requirements of this Chapter. 6. 8. Off-street parking shall be provided in conformance with the requirements of this Chapter. 7. 9. Landscaping shall be improved to bring the site on which the structure is located into closer compliance with the landscaping requirements of this Chapter, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. 8. 10. Architectural massing, features and detailing, shall be modified to bring the structure into closer compliance with the architectural standards of this Chapter, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. (46)Rehabilitation, enlargement or exterior structural alterations of buildings occupied by a single family and two-family dwellings is permitted subject to the following: a. Structural alterations and additions may be made where the total floor area of all such expansions occurring in a five-year period does not exceed forty (40) percent of the floor space of the building as it existed at the beginning of that five-year period, provided the number of dwelling units is not increased; and no new non-conformances with the requirements of this code Chapter are created. b. Structural alterations and additions which exceed forty (40) percent of the total floor area as it existed at the beginning of a five-year period; or remodeling which involves the demolition of more than fifty (50) percent of the building shall be permitted; provided that the following conditions are met: 1. Off-street parking shall be provided in conformance with the requirements of this Chapter. 2. No new nonconformities with the requirements of this Chapter are created.     City Council 22 – 90 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 6 of 49 3. A minimum of eight hundred (800) square feet of usable, continuous, non-front yard open-space, excluding driveways and parking areas is provided. Any open space with a minimum dimension of fifteen (15) feet by fifteen (15) feet shall be deemed continuous open space. c. Where rehabilitation of a building involves more than fifty (50) percent of a building wall which encroaches into a front or side yard setback and is demolished or is structurally altered, the remainder of the building wall shall be demolished. Any subsequent building wall shall conform to all provisions of this Chapter. d. An existing two-car garage with a minimum dimension of eighteen (18) feet by eighteen (18) feet exterior dimension shall be considered con- forming. e. Remodeling shall mean to reconstruct, or to make over in structure or style, but shall exclude re-roof, window replacement, exterior finish replacement and repair or similar modifications, as determined by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. f. No provision contained in this Article shall be interpreted or implemented in a manner inconsistent with State law addressing accessory dwelling units, as contained in Government Code Section 66310, et. seq., as amended from time to time. (7) Discontinuance of Nonconforming Uses, Generally. Nonconforming uses shall be discontinued pursuant to Sec. 41-683 (Discontinuance of nonconforming building or use) of this Chapter, regardless of intent, except as provided below: a. Discontinuance of Noxious Use. 1. If a nonconforming industrial use that meets the definition of a Noxious Use as defined in this Article requires a new certificate of occupancy for any reason other than a change in business name with no change in owner of the business, legal nonconforming status shall be lost and any subsequent use must conform in every respect to the provisions of this Article. 2. If a nonconforming industrial use that meets the definition of a Noxious Use as defined in this Article is in violation of any applicable Federal, State, or local regulation, as provided below, legal nonconforming status shall be lost and any subsequent use of the building shall conform in every respect to the provisions of this Chapter: A. The violation lasts a period of thirty (30) consecutive days; or B. The violation(s) are observed and documented for a total period of sixty (60) days in a one-year period; or     City Council 22 – 91 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 7 of 49 C. Three noncompliant notices from a Federal, State, or local regulatory agency relating to or arising from the nonconforming use are sent in a one-year period. 3. For the purpose of this subsection (7) a. 2.: A. The thirty (30) consecutive day time period shall be measured from the date of the first observed and documented violation. B. A one-year period shall be the twelve (12) consecutive months of time preceding the sixtieth (60th) day of total violations; or the twelve (12) consecutive months of time preceding the issuance of the third (3rd) noncompliant notice. C. Local regulations mean the SAMC, including, but not limited to, the operational standards contained in Section 41-2009 of this Article. D. A local regulatory agency includes the City, County of Orange, special districts, or any other local government agency charged with regulating noxious uses. E. Noncompliant notices may include, but are not limited to, Notice to Comply and Notice of Violation as issued by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQB). (8) Elimination of Nonconforming Uses and Structures. a. Elimination of Nonconforming Uses and Structures, Generally. 1. The City Council has determined that elimination of nonconforming uses and structures by amortization may be considered based upon one or more of the following factors: A. The threat to the public health, safety, and welfare posed by the continuance of the nonconforming use or structure; B. Adaptability of the land and improvements to a currently permitted use; C. Compatibility with the existing land use patterns and densities of the surrounding neighborhood;     City Council 22 – 92 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 8 of 49 D. Excessive calls for service to applicable response agencies related to the operation of the nonconforming use; and E. Failures to remedy notices of violation, administrative warnings, or other notices of noncompliance issued by a Federal, State, or local agency, including the City. 2. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, in conjunction with other City Departments and Agencies, may establish, and periodically update, a list or data resource that identifies categories of nonconforming uses or structures with specific metrics and operational characteristics, to develop a ranking system for use in the consideration of eliminating nonconforming uses or structures through amortization. 3. The determination of an appropriate amortization period for termination of a nonconforming use pursuant to this Article shall be made by a Hearing Officer retained by the City and who has professional legal and land use experience to address amortization. The Hearing Officer shall order nonconforming uses and structures to be discontinued and removed from their sites within a period determined pursuant to the process set forth in Subsection b (Establishment of Amortization Periods), and consider the following: A. If the nonconforming user has not made a substantial investment in furtherance of the use or structure, or if the investment can be substantially utilized or recovered through a currently permitted use, the order may require a nonconforming use or structure to be discontinued and removed from their site within a minimum of one year after the date of the order. B. If the nonconforming user has made a substantial investment in furtherance of the use or structure, or if the investment cannot be substantially utilized or recovered through a currently permitted use, the order may require the discontinuation and removal of the nonconforming use or structure within a longer reasonable amount of time. C. Nonconforming uses or structures that are determined to be an imminent threat to the public health or safety may be subject to immediate cessation and removal, pursuant to Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the SAMC. 4. Nonconforming uses and structures may also, upon order from the City or a court order, be subject to immediate cessation and removal of the nonconforming use or structure. b. Establishment of Amortization Periods. Where a period during which a nonconforming use or structure is to be discontinued and removed from a     City Council 22 – 93 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 9 of 49 site or sites is required pursuant to this Article, such period shall be established as follows: 1. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall submit the nonconforming use or structure and a recommended amortization period, based on subsection 4. herein, to a Hearing Officer pursuant to Chapter 3 of the SAMC for review; 2. The Hearing Officer shall hold a noticed hearing to consider the recommended amortization period. Notice of the hearing shall be provided to the owner or operator of the nonconforming use or structure and the property owner at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Additional notice may also be provided to surrounding property owners and/or tenants, at the discretion of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. 3. The Hearing Officer shall consider the recommendations submitted by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, the General Plan of the City, and any testimony or evidence provided during the hearing, in order to determine the amortization schedule for elimination of the nonconforming use or structure. 4. The Hearing Officer shall establish a maximum amortization period during which the nonconforming use or structure shall be permitted to continue after considering the following in relation to the use or structure: A. The amount of investment or original cost of the use or structure; B. The present actual or depreciated value of the use or structure; C. The remaining useful life of the use or structure; D. The remaining term of the lease (if applicable); E. The date or dates of construction; F. Amortization of the business or structure for tax purposes; G. The salvage value; H. Adaptability of the land and improvements to a currently permitted use; I. Cost of moving and reestablishing the use elsewhere; J. Compatibility with the existing land use patterns and densities of the surrounding neighborhood; K. The threat to the public health, safety, and welfare posed by the continuance of the nonconforming use or structure;     City Council 22 – 94 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 10 of 49 L. Calls for service to applicable response agencies; M. Notices of violation, administrative warnings, or other notices of noncompliance arising from or related to the nonconforming use issued by a Federal, State, or local agency, including the City; and N. Other factors as appropriate. c. Hearing Officer Determination and Compliance. The determination of the Hearing Officer shall be made in writing and shall be final. 1. Notice of Amortization and Termination of Use. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall give notice by certified mail of the date upon which an amortization period will end to each owner of record whose property, or use of property, is not in conformance with the regulations of this Article, in those instances where an amortization period has been determined pursuant to this Article. Such notice shall be sent within ten (10) days of the determination of the Hearing Officer. If the amortization period ends before or less than six (6) months after providing such notice, the notice shall be given that the amortization period in each instance shall be not less than six (6) months from the date the notice is sent. The notice shall set forth all pertinent provisions of this Article, including the declared purposes thereof and the approved amortization term. Failure to send notice by mail to any such owner where the address of such owner is not a matter of public record shall not invalidate any proceedings under this Article. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall be authorized to record a Notice of Amortization Term & Termination of Use with the County Recorder, as provided for in California Government Code Section 27201(a). 2. Notice of Termination and Order to Comply and Conclusion of Amortization Period. Notice of Termination of a nonconforming use and order to comply shall be served by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, at the end of the amortization period upon the owner of record whose property contains such nonconforming use. In those instances, where the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, is unable with reasonable effort to serve such notice to the property owner, such notice and order shall be served within thirty (30) days of the end of the amortization period by delivering same to an occupant of the structure containing the nonconforming use.     City Council 22 – 95 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 11 of 49 3. Request for a Continuance of Nonconformities Beyond Period of Amortization Period. A request for a continuance of nonconformities beyond the period of amortization may be granted as follows: A. Grounds for Continuance. A nonconforming use or structure may be maintained for a reasonable time beyond its period of amortization as specified in this Article if the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, makes the following determinations: i. Special Circumstances. That special circumstances apply to any such use or structure that do not apply generally to others affected hereby; and ii. Compatibility with Public Welfare. That such a continuance for a prescribed period of additional time is in the public interest and will be reasonably compatible with, and not detrimental to, the use of adjacent properties. B. Application Process for Continuance. Any application for a continuance of a nonconforming use or structure must be filed with the Planning Division no later than thirty (30) days following the service of a Notice of Termination and Order to comply, or within thirty (30) days following the continued termination date. An application for a continuance may be filed by the owner of the property, a person with a power of attorney from the owner of the property, or a lessee, if the terms of the lease permit the existing use. Fees shall be required in accordance with this Code. C. Determination by Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. Upon filing of a complete application, the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall investigate the matter, give proper notice to the applicant, hold an administrative hearing and make a decision thereon based on the criteria set out in this Section and supported by written findings of fact within seventy-five (75) days from the date the application is filed, or within such extended period of time as may be mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, may impose such conditions, including additional time extensions not to exceed two (2) additional years, as may be deemed necessary for the compatibility of such nonconformity with adjacent properties. D. Appeals. Appeals shall be filed in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.     City Council 22 – 96 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 12 of 49 4. Failure to Comply with Hearing Officer’s Determination. Failure to comply with the Hearing Officer’s determination to discontinue a nonconforming use or structure shall constitute a violation of this Chapter and is subject to fines and enforcement provisions of Sec. 1-8 of the SAMC. 5. Failure to Terminate Use at Conclusion of Amortization Period. The failure to terminate a nonconforming use at the conclusion of an approved amortization period shall be deemed a public nuisance in accordance with California Government Code, Section 38771. The City is hereby authorized to abate the nuisance in accordance with Chapter 17 of this Code or may pursue any alternative remedy to abate the use authorized by this Code or State law. d. Additional Administrative Policies and Procedures. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, may enact and shall publish any additional administrative policies and procedures to effectuate the purposes of this Chapter, including, but not limited to, administrative policies and procedures to govern the selection of a neutral hearing officer and the conduct of hearings for the Establishment of Amortization Periods in order to implement the provisions of this Article. (9) Abatement. The provisions of this Section are in addition to authority existing under State law to declare and abate a public nuisance pursuant to California law and other applicable provisions of the SAMC. In the event that a legal nonconforming structure or use is found to constitute a public nuisance, appropriate and alternative action may be taken by the City pursuant to Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the SAMC and Article VIII (Enforcement) of this Chapter). (10) Exception. The provisions of this section shall not apply to multifamily dwellings damaged or destroyed by fire in accordance with Government Code Section 65852.2. (11) Voluntary Compliance Agreement. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, is hereby authorized to enter into a Voluntary Compliance Agreement with a business owner or property owner in order to establish terms for compliance with the provisions of this Article.” Section 6. Section 41-2004 (The Industrial Overlay I-OZ) Zone) of Chapter 41 of the SAMC is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2004 Reserved. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone (a) The Industrial Overlay Zone (I-OZ) is applied to areas zoned M1 or M2 and occupied with an industrial use at the time of the adoption of this Article. The zoning for the individual parcels shall be determined by Sectional District Map number 7- 5-9 as it appeared on May 1, 2010.     City Council 22 – 97 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 13 of 49 (b) The I-OZ allows the M1 and M2 regulations to apply to said parcel until such time as the property owner applies to modify the zoning district. The Regulating Plan identifies the boundaries of the applicable zoning district (i.e. Transit Village, Urban Center, Corridor, Urban Neighborhood 1 or Urban Neighborhood 2) within the Transit Zoning Code. (c) A property owner may apply to develop the parcel consistent with the applicable zoning district within the Transit Zoning Code. The applicant shall receive all the necessary site approvals including, the approval of the overlay zone site plan pursuant to Article III, Division 28 prior to development. (d) The uses in the I-OZ shall be subject to the regulations of the M1 and M2 zones (SAMC 41, Article III, Divisions 18 and 19), as applicable.” Section 7. Section 41-2005 (Application for Discretionary Approvals) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2005. Application for Discretionary Approvals (a) Site Plan Review shall mean specific development plan and shall comply with Sections 41-593.4 through 41-593.6. Sections 41-593.4 through 41-593.6 shall only apply to structures over four (4) stories in height. (b) Conditional use permits, variances and minor exceptions. Conditional use permits, variances and minor exceptions shall be subject to Article V of this Chapter, except for the permit thresholds for minor exceptions shall be as identified in Table 1B of this Article. (c) Effect of amendments to this Article on applications in progress shall apply as follows: (1) Discretionary Applications Submitted and Determined Complete. All discretionary permit applications that are active and that have been determined to be complete before the effective date of the Article or any amendment, shall be processed in compliance with the requirements in effect when the application was deemed complete, and pursuant to all requirements of Sections 41-2008 and 41-2009. (2) Approved Projects Not Yet Under Construction. Any structure authorized by a discretionary permit or approval of a land use as allowed by this Article for which a Building Permit application has been submitted or a Building Permit has been issued may be constructed in compliance with the permit or approval, as long as construction is completed and the approved land use is established before the expiration of the permit or, where applicable, before the expiration of any approved time extension. (3) Project Under Construction. A project for which a Building Permit has been issued may be continued and completed in compliance with the plans and specifications upon which the permit was issued.”     City Council 22 – 98 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 14 of 49 Section 8. Section 41-2006 (Zones Established) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended, including the replacement of Figure 2.1, to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2006. Zones Established (a) Purpose. This section establishes the zones applied to property within the plan area by the Regulating Plan. The Regulating Plan divides the plan area into separate zones that are based on a transect of intensity within the plan area that ranges from the most urban types of development and land use to the least urban types, with most zones providing for a significant mixture of land uses within them. This approach differs from conventional zoning maps that typically divide cities into zones that rigidly segregate residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses into separate areas, and thereby require residents to drive for nearly all daily activities. The use of zones based on development intensity (instead of land use zones) as the spatial basis for regulating development, directly reflects the functions of, and interrelationships between, each part of the plan area. The zones also effectively implement the City’s urban design objectives for each part of the plan area, to establish and maintain attractive distinctions between each zone. This is why some parcels are zoned with more than one zone. In such cases, the zoning is divided along a clear boundary such as the middle of a block. The zones of this Regulating Plan allocate architectural types, frontage types, and land uses within the plan area, as well as providing detailed standards for building placement, height and profile. The diagram to the right Figure 2.1 identifies the eight (8) 9 zones applied within the plan area as they relate to existing rights-of- way and parcels. (b) Zones established. The following zones are applicable to this specific plan, and applied to property within the boundary as shown on the Regulating Plan. (1) Transit Village (TV) Zone. The Transit Village zone is intended to provide standards for compact transit- supportive mixed-use/residential development. This zone is characterized by a wide range of building intensity, including mixed-use tower-on-podium buildings, flex blocks, liners, stacked flats, and courtyard housing. The zone accommodates retail, restaurant, entertainment, and other pedestrian-oriented uses at street level, with offices and flats above in the mixed-use building types, at high intensities and densities. The landscape palette is urban, with shading and accent street trees in parkway strips along Santa Ana Boulevard, and in sidewalk tree wells where on-street parking is provided. Parking is accommodated on-street, in structures with liner buildings, and underground. (2) Government Center (GC) Zone. This area accommodates a wide variety of civic uses, including Federal, State, and local government offices and services, libraries, museums, community centers, and other civic assembly facilities and is identified, but not regulated, by this Article. Refer to City requirements as identified in SAMC Chapter 41.     City Council 22 – 99 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 15 of 49 Building types vary according to their public purpose, are programmed by the various government agencies for their specific sites, and therefore are not coded by this Article the Transit Zoning Code (SD84A and SD84B). The landscape style is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells, and in landscaped public plazas. (3) Downtown (DT) Zone. This zone is applied to the historical shopping district of Santa Ana, a vital, pedestrian-oriented area that is defined by multi-story urban building types (flex blocks, live-work, stacked dwellings, and courtyard housing in the Downtown edges) accommodating a mixture of retail, office, light service, and residential uses. The standards of this zone are intended to reinforce the form and character represented by pre-World War II buildings and recognized as a National Historic District, through restoration, rehabilitation, and context- sensitive infill. The standards also facilitate the replacement or improvement of post-war development that eliminated the pedestrian orientation of various downtown blocks (for example, parking structures with no features of pedestrian interest along their entire lengths). The landscape style is urban, emphasizing shading and accent street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on-street and may also be in structures with liner buildings, underground, and within block centers in surface lots not visible from streets. (4) Urban Center (UC) Zone. This zone is applied to the area surrounding the Downtown, which serves as a transitional area to the surrounding lower intensity neighborhoods and to other areas where mixed-use and multi-unit residential buildings create a pedestrian- oriented urban fabric. The zone provides for a variety of non-residential uses and a mix of housing types at medium intensities and densities. Besides accommodating community serving businesses, this zone may also serve the daily convenience shopping and service needs of nearby residents. Building types include mixed-use Flex Blocks, stacked flats, live-work, row- houses, and courtyard housing. The landscape is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on-street and may also be in structures with liner buildings and underground in areas adjacent to the DT zone, and in surface lots away from street frontages. (5) Corridor (CDR) Zone. This zone is applied to properties fronting existing commercial corridors and provides standards to improve pedestrian-orientation in a transit-supportive, mixed-use area. Mixed-use flex block and live-work building types are at or near the sidewalk, and accommodate street level retail, service, and office uses, with office and residential above. The landscape style is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on-street, and in screened surface lots between buildings, or away from streets, with no more than half the site frontage occupied by parking. (6) Urban Neighborhood 2 (UN-2) Zone. This zone is applied to primarily residential areas intended to accommodate a variety of housing types, with some opportunities for live-work, neighborhood- serving retail, and cafes. Appropriate building types include single dwellings,     City Council 22 – 100 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 16 of 49 duplexes, triplexes and quadplexes, courtyard housing, rowhouses, and live- work. In some areas, the more intense, hybrid court building type is allowed where additional intensity is warranted while maintaining compatibility with neighboring properties (see Regulating Plan). The landscape is appropriate to a neighborhood, with shading street trees in parkway strips, and shallow- depth landscaped front yards separating buildings from sidewalks. Parking is on- street, and in garages located away from street frontages. (7) Urban Neighborhood 1 (UN-1) Zone. This zone is applied to existing primarily residential areas and is intended to strengthen and stabilize the low intensity nature of these neighborhoods. Appropriate building types include single dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes, and live-work. The landscape is appropriate to a neighborhood, with shading street trees in parkway strips and landscaped front yards separating buildings from sidewalks. Parking is on-street, and in garages located away from street frontages. (8) Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone. The I-OZ is applied to areas currently zoned M1 or M2, and occupied with an industrial use, to allow the types of land use activity and development permitted by existing M1 and M2 zoning to continue until such time that the owner chooses to apply the new zones identified in Figure 2.1. In order to determine if the M1 or M2 land use activity and development apply to a particular parcel, the I-OZ is further identified as I-OZ-M1 or I-OZ-M2. Until the property owner applies to modify the zoning district, property in the I-OZ shall be regulated by the provisions of the M1 and M2 zones (SAMC 41, Article III, Divisions 18 and 19), as applicable. (8) (9) Open Space (O) Zone. This zone identifies areas reserved for community parks and other open spaces and is identified, but not regulated, by this Article. Refer to City requirements as identified in SAMC Chapter 41. Allowable structures in this zone are limited to those necessary to support the specific purposes of the particular open space area (e.g., sport-court enclosures and multi-purpose buildings in active parks, and trails within passive parks).” Figure 2.1 Regulating Plan with Existing R.O.W.     City Council 22 – 101 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 17 of 49 Figure 2.1 Regulating Plan with Existing R.O.W.     City Council 22 – 102 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 18 of 49 Section 9. Section 41-2007 (Uses Permitted) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2007. Uses Permitted. (a) Allowable Land Use Types. A parcel or building within the Specific Development SD-84 area shall be occupied by only the land uses allowed by the table entitled Use Standards (hereinafter Use Standards Table) within the zone applied to the site by the Regulating Plan. (b) No building shall be erected, constructed, reconstructed or structurally altered except in conformance with the provisions contained herein; nor shall any building or land be used for any purpose other than that which is permitted in the district or modified district in which such building or land is located. All uses, as defined in this Article, not expressly permitted in any district enumerated in Table 2A, are prohibited. (b) (c) Garage sales are allowed in compliance with Section 41-193. (c) (d) Temporary outdoor activities are allowed in compliance with Section 41-195.5. (d) (e) Youth amusement rides are permitted in compliance with Section 41-366 for C1 districts. (e) (f) Drive-through facilities shall not be permitted. (g) The conversion of existing structures containing residential land uses to non- residential land uses is prohibited in the UN-1 and UN-2 zones. Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RESIDENTIAL Live-Work Use / Joint living-working quarters P (2) P (2) P (2) P (2) CUP CUP Care Homes CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Single Dwelling --- --- --- --- P P Multi-Family Dwellings P (1) P (1) P (1) P (1) P P Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RECREATION, EDUCATION AND ASSEMBLY Community assembly P (1) P (1) P (1) P CUP CUP     City Council 22 – 103 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 19 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Health/fitness facility P P P P CUP --- Library, museum P P P P P CUP Schools P (1) P (1) P (1) P CUP CUP Studio P P P P CUP CUP Trade School P (1) P (1) P (1) P (1) CUP --- Theater, cinema or performing arts P P P P CUP --- Commercial Recreation (Indoor) up to 5,000 square feet maximum floor area per tenant CUP P CUP P CUP P --- --- P --- Commercial Recreation (Indoor) > 5,000 square feet floor area per tenant CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RETAIL General retail, except with any of the following features P P P P P (2) --- • Floor area over 20,000 per tenant CUP CUP P --- CUP --- Artisan/craft product – limited on-site production CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Eating establishments P P P P P (2) --- Auto or motor vehicle service --- --- P P --- --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SERVICE GENERAL Banquet facility/catering-sub. to 41.199.1(a) through (d) CUP CUP CUP CUP (1) CUP --- Child day Day care center P (3) P (3) P P CUP CUP Adult day care center-subject to 41.199.2 of the SAMC P (3) P (3) P P P ---     City Council 22 – 104 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 20 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Hotel, excludes transient residential hotel and long-term stay P P P P --- --- Mortuaries, funeral homes --- --- CUP P --- --- Personal services P P P P P (2) P (2) Personal services - restricted --- --- CUP CUP CUP --- Pet day care facility CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP --- Tattoo/Body Art Establishments - subject to 41.199.3 of the SAMC P P P P --- --- Craft and specialized automotive restoration service --- P P P CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SERVICES-BUSINESS-FINANCIAL-PROFESSIONAL-TECHNOLOGY Bank, financial services P P P P --- --- Business support service P P P P P (2) P (2) Clinic, urgent care --- --- CUP P --- --- Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc., office P (1) P (1) P (1) P --- --- Extended Care P P P P CUP --- Laboratory – medical – analytical --- P (1) P (1) P CUP --- Media production – office or storefront type (no soundstage) P P P (1) --- P --- Professional / administrative/service office P (1) P (1) P (1) P P (2) P (2) Research and development P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SMALL SCALE INDUSTRY     City Council 22 – 105 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 21 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Artisan/craft product manufacturing CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Furniture and fixture manufacturing, cabinet shop P (3) --- P (3) --- --- --- Laboratory - medical - analytical --- P (1) P (1) P --- --- Manufacturing - light P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Media production - office or storefront type (no sound stage) P P P (1) --- --- --- Printing and publishing --- P (1) P --- --- --- Research and development P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION, INFRASTRUCTURE Helistops CUP CUP --- --- --- --- Parking facility - public or commercial, inclusive of ancillary recharging spaces for electric vehicles P P P P --- --- Transit station or terminal CUP --- --- CUP --- --- Public utility structure, excluding wireless communication facilities --- --- --- --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 MISCELLANEOUS Any structure over four (4) stories in height SPR SPR SPR SPR SPR --- Businesses operating between 12 and 7 am CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Alcoholic beverage sales or consumption CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP --- Expansion of existing, legally established self- storage facility --- --- --- --- CUP ---     City Council 22 – 106 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 22 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Drive-thru facility --- --- --- --- --- --- Section 10. Section 41-2008 (Operational Standards) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2008. Operational Standards for Permitted Uses. Section 41-2008 outlines the general operational standards applicable to all permitted or conditionally permitted nonresidential uses listed in Table 2A-Use Standards of Section 41-2007 (Uses Permitted). (a) All property shall be maintained in a safe, sanitary and attractive condition including, but not limited to, structures, landscaping, parking areas, walkways, and trash enclosures. (b) All business activities shall be conducted and located within an enclosed building, except as allowed by Section 41-195 of the SAMC and except that the following business activities may be conducted outside of an enclosed building: (1) Newsstands (2) Flower Stands (c) There shall be no manufacturing, processing, compounding, assembling or treatment of any material or product., other than that which is clearly incidental to a particular retail and ser- vice general enterprise, and where such goods are sold on the premises. (d) There shall be no work inside of a structure that generates noise that exceeds 60 dB CNEL measured at the exterior wall of the individual tenant unit of a structure.     City Council 22 – 107 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 23 of 49 (e) Storage of goods and supplies shall be limited to those sold at retail on the premises or utilized in the course of business. (f) Public utility structures, including electric distribution and transmission substations shall be screened by a solid wall at least eight (8) feet high, except as restricted by Sections 36-45, 36-46, and 36-47. (g) Any activity permitted shall be conducted in such a manner as not to have a detrimental effect on permitted adjacent uses by reason of refuse matter, noise, light, or vibration. (h) Small scale industry Artisan/craft product - limited on site production and research and development land uses shall require a solid wall or fence not less than eight (8) feet in height along any rear or side lot line. (i) All business activities, including, but not limited to, compounding, processing, packaging or assembly of articles of merchandise and treatment of products shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building. No ancillary vehicle maintenance or repair shall be allowed on site. (j) Loading areas shall not be visible from streets. Loading areas not facing a street shall be setback at least thirty-five (35) feet from the property line. (k) No business activity that generates noise or vibration shall be conducted between 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. Saturday and Sunday. (l) Operational standards for aAutomobile servicing uses including nonconforming establishments, shall comply with the following operational standards: (1) No automobile servicing shall be conducted before 7:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and before 10:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. (2) All work shall be conducted inside an enclosed structure. (3) Outdoor or overnight vehicle storage is not permitted.” Section 11. Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby added in its entirety to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2009. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses. (a) In addition to the operational standards listed in Sec. 41-2008, with the exception of subsection (c) of Sec. 41-2008, the following shall apply to nonconforming industrial uses:     City Council 22 – 108 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 24 of 49 (1) The purpose of these operational standards is to protect and improve the living and working environment, the appearance of the community, reduce or eliminate nuisance conditions, and minimize the impacts of industrial uses on adjacent properties. (2) These standards are in addition to the operational standards established in Sec. 41-2008, except as noted above, and shall apply to all nonconforming industrial uses, including those existing industrial uses that become nonconforming at the effective date of any implementing ordinance. (3) Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in a manner creating any dangerous, injurious, or noxious fire, explosive or other hazard that would adversely affect the surrounding area. (4) If any nonconforming use that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to: frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints relating to the nonconforming use; or is not in good standing with the City, including, but not limited to violations of Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code or public nuisances as defined and addressed by Chapter 17 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including initiating a hearing to consider business license revocation and/or terminating utility services or connections. For the purposes of this section, “frequent” is defined as more than one (1) violation, call, or complaint per month during any twelve (12) month period, and “constant service calls” is defined as more than one (1) service call per month relating to or arising from the nonconforming use during any twelve (12) month period (b) Enclosed Operations. (1) All business activities, including, but not limited to, compounding, processing, packaging, or assembly of articles of merchandise and treatment of products shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building. (2) No automobile service or repair of any kind shall be allowed outdoors on site. (c) Air Emissions and Dust (1) No land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere. (2) Uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emit dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. Sources of air emissions shall comply with all rules established by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40), the California Air Resources Board, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. (d) Light, Glare, and Heat     City Council 22 – 109 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 25 of 49 (1) No direct or indirect glare or heat, whether from floodlights or from high- temperature processes (including combustion or welding or otherwise) shall be visible or felt at the property line. (2) To ensure that industrial development does not create light and glare nuisances, the following performance standards shall be observed: a. Lighting must be shielded, boxed, or directed at a downward angle so as to minimize the generation of light and glare and to ensure that there is no spillover of light and glare that will impact drivers or pedestrians on the public streets, on-site activities, and adjoining or nearby properties. b. No activity shall be permitted which causes excessive light and glare to be transmitted or reflected to surrounding properties at a level resulting in detrimental impacts to adjacent properties as determined by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. (3) Light sources shall generally not be permitted in landscaped, buffer, or setback areas except for those illuminating pedestrian walkways. Lighting used to illuminate parking areas shall be designed, located, and installed to be shielded and down-lit and to reflect away from any nearby residential areas. Lighting for advertising signs shall not create glare or light which extends to surrounding properties. (4) No use shall be operated such that significant, direct glare, incidental to the operation of the use, is visible beyond the boundaries of the lot where the use is located. (e) Ground Vibration (1) No use shall generate ground vibration perceptible without instruments at any point along the property line of the site except for motor vehicle operations. (2) No vibration shall be produced that is transmitted through the ground and is discernible without the aid of instruments by a reasonable person at the property lines of the site. Vibrations from temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that enter and leave the subject parcel are exempt from this standard. (f) Materials or Waste Storage (1) No material or waste shall be deposited upon a subject parcel in such form or manner that it may be transferred off the parcel by natural causes or forces. (2) All materials or wastes which might cause fumes or dust, or which constitute a fire hazard, or which may be edible by or otherwise be attractive to rodents or insects shall be stored outdoors only in closed containers. (g) Hazardous Materials     City Council 22 – 110 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 26 of 49 (1) Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in any manner so as to create any fire, explosive or other hazard. All activities involving the use or storage of combustible, explosive, caustic, or otherwise hazardous materials shall comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal safety standards and shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fire and explosion, and adequate firefighting and fire suppression equipment in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations. The burning of waste materials in open fires without written approval of the Fire Department is prohibited. (2) No activities shall be permitted which emit dangerous radioactivity at any point nor shall electrical disturbances which adversely affect the operation of any equipment, other than that of the creator of such disturbances, be allowed. (3) No use, activity or process shall cause electromagnetic interference with normal radio and television reception, or with the function of other electronic equipment beyond the property line of the site in which it is situated. All uses, activities and processes shall comply with applicable Federal Communications Commission regulations. (h) Liquid and Solid Waste (1) Liquid or solid wastes discharged from the premises shall be properly treated prior to discharge so as not to contaminate or pollute any watercourse or groundwater supply or interfere with bacterial processes in sewage treatment. (2) The disposal or dumping of solid wastes, such as slag, paper and fiber wastes, or other industrial wastes, is prohibited. (3) Wastes shall be handled and stored so as to prevent nuisances, health, safety, and fire hazards, and to facilitate recycling subject to the review and oversight of the Fire Department. Closed containers shall be provided and used for the storage of any materials which by their nature are combustible, volatile, dust, or odor producing or edible or attractive to rodents, vermin, or insects. (i) Site Maintenance. All industrial land uses shall be maintained in compliance with Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and not constitute public nuisances as defined and addressed by Chapter 17 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code at all times and consistent with project conditions of approval (if applicable). (j) Truck Parking and Loading (1) All truck parking areas must be on paved surfaces. The parking, loading or unloading of trucks associated with a business on public streets is prohibited. (2) Trucks idling is prohibited. (3) All truck parking and loading areas shall be maintained in good condition as determined by the City. Annual inspections may be conducted by the City to     City Council 22 – 111 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 27 of 49 ensure compliance. Any violation or failure to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter shall be deemed a nuisance. Section 12. Section 41-2080 (Definitions) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2080 - Definitions (a) The words and phrases, shall be construed as defined in this Article, unless from the context a different meaning is intended or unless a different meaning is specifically defined and more particularly directed to the use of such words or phrases. The words used in the present tense include the future tense, and words in the singular number include the plural number. If any of the definitions in this section conflict with definitions in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), these definitions shall control for the purposes of this Article. If any term herein is not defined by this subsection, the definitions contained within Division 2 (Definitions) of Article I of Chapter 41 of the SAMC shall apply. (1) Access (Direct): The physical pedestrian entrance to a unit that is provided directly from the street or courtyard. Also described as walk-up access. (2) Access (Point): The physical pedestrian entrance to a unit that is provided through a common space, such as a lobby or corridor that connects directly to the street or courtyard. Also described as non-walk-up access. (3) Accessory Structure: An accessory structure or building is a detached building or structure, or part of a building or structure, which is incidental or subordinate to the main building, structure or use on the same lot or parcel of land, without cooking facilities (e.g., storage shed, garage, gazebo), and is used exclusively by the occupant of the main building. (4) Alley: An alley is any public or private thoroughfare for the use of pedestrians or vehicles, not less than ten (10) feet nor more than thirty (30) feet in width, and is intended for service and only a secondary means of access to abutting properties. (5) Arcade: see ‘Frontage Types’ (6) Artisan/craft product manufacturing - limited on-site production: The manufacturing of products primarily by hand by persons trained in an artistic skill, including ceramics, pottery, glass blowing, or sculptures. A specialized commercial facility with a retail-facing operation open to the public. Products are typically made by hand or with a restricted level of automation demonstrating an artistic skill. On-site production of artisan/craft product activities include design, production, processing, printing, assembly, treatment, testing, repair, and packaging, as well as any incidental storage. Typical artisan/craft products include, but are not limited to, electronics, food products, furniture-making, beverages, leather products, clocks and watches, jewelry, clothing/apparel, metal work, furniture and fine woodworking, glass, ceramics, paper and paper products, soaps, perfumes, and lotions, together with ancillary training and/or educational program activities.     City Council 22 – 112 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 28 of 49 (7) Attic: The area found directly below the roof of a building and the ceiling of the top floor. The attic shall be an uninhabitable area. (8) Automobile repair: Automobile repair is the repair of motor vehicles, including the repair or replacement of engines and transmissions, body and fender repair, and the installation of non-factory installed products except those permissible through automobile servicing as defined herein. (9) Automobile service or automobile servicing: Automobile service or automobile servicing is the servicing and minor repair of motor vehicles, including the replacement of belts, hoses, batteries, tires, shock absorbers, oil and air filters, chassis lubrication, air conditioning servicing, wheel alignments, replacement of brake pads, and engine tune-ups. (10) Bank, financial institution: An establishment for the custody, loan, exchange or issue of money, for the extension of credit, and for facilitating the transmission of funds. Excludes check cashers as defined by California Civil Code section 1789.31. (11) Basement: That portion of a building between floor and ceiling which is either totally or partly below grade and in compliance with the definition of basement established in the California Building Code (CBC). (12) Block: An area of land within a subdivision which area is entirely bounded by streets, highways or ways, excepts alley and the exterior boundary of the subdivision. (13) Building Height: The vertical extent of a building measured in stories to the eave of the highest story, not including a basement or an attic. Height limits do not apply to masts, belfries, clock towers, steeples, equipment screening, chimney flues, and similar structures. Building height shall be measured from the average grade of the fronting thoroughfare curb level. (14) Building Placement: The maximum horizontal envelope available for placing a building on a lot. (15) Building Type: A structure defined by the combination of configuration and placement. The building types used in this Article are listed below: a. Bungalow Court: A configuration of freestanding single units arranged around a common, shared courtyard that is wholly open to the street. The individual buildings are arranged next to each other to form the bungalow court building type. b. Courtyard Housing: A building type consisting of residences that can be arranged in four possible configurations: townhouses, townhouses over flats, flats, and flats over flats. The structures are arranged next to each other, on one or more courts that are partly or wholly open to the street.     City Council 22 – 113 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 29 of 49 c. Duplex, Triplex, and Quadplex: Multiple dwelling forms that are architecturally presented as large single-family houses in their typical neighborhood setting. d. Flex Block: A building generally of a single massing element, designed for occupancy by retail, service, or office uses on the ground floor, with upper floors also configured for those uses or for residences. e. House: A structure occupied by a single household that also accommodates commercial and office uses as allowed. f. Hybrid Court: A building that combines the point-access portion of the stacked dwelling building type (double-loaded corridor element) with the walk-up portion of the courtyard housing building type. g. Lined Block: A building that conceals a public garage or other faceless building that is designed for occupancy by retail, service, or office uses on the ground floor, with upper floors also configured for those uses or for residences. h. Live/Work: An integrated residence and working space, occupied and utilized by a single household in an arrangement of at least 3 such structures or 1 multiple structure with a least 3 units arranged side by side along the primary frontage, that has been designed or structurally modified to accommodate joint residential occupancy and work activity. i. Rowhouse: An individual structure on a parcel with a private rear yard and individual garage accessed from an alley. Such structure shall be developed in an arrangement of at least 3 such structures along the primary frontage. Or, a structure of at least 3 attached townhouse unit types arranged side by side with a private rear yard and individual garage accessed from an alley along the primary frontage. j. Stacked Dwellings: A building of single-floor or multi-floor residences of similar configuration either above or below that are stacked. k. Tower-on-Podium: A multi-level building organized around a central core with the first two to five floors expressed as a podium building. l. Tuck-Under Housing: An individual structure on a parcel with no rear yard, where its garage is tucked under the rear of the house and accessed from an alley. Such structure shall be developed with at least four such individual structures, or a structure of at least four attached townhouse units types arranged side by side along the primary frontage. (16) Bungalow Court: See 'Building Types' (17) Business support service: a commercial establishment that provides services to other businesses including maintenance, repair and service, testing, rental, etc. including the following examples:     City Council 22 – 114 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 30 of 49 a. Computer-related services (rental/repair) b. Copying and quick printing services c. Film processing and photofinishing (retail) d. Graphic design services e. Mailing and mail box services f. Security systems services (18) Clinic, Urgent Care: A facility other than a hospital where medical, mental health, surgical or other personal health services are provided on an outpatient basis, including incidental medical laboratories. Examples of these uses include: a. mMedical offices with five or more licensed practitioners or medical specialties b. oOut-patient care facilities, urgent care facilities. c. Counseling services by other than medical doctors or psychiatrists are included under "Offices - Professional/Administrative." (19) Community Assembly: Group gatherings conducted indoors such as synagogues, mosques, temples, churches, community centers, bingo halls, private clubs, fraternal, philanthropic and charitable organizations and lodges. (20) Commercial Recreation Facility - Indoor: Establishments providing indoor amusement and entertainment services for a fee or admission charge, including: a. Bowling alleys, tossing or throwing games, indoor sports b. Coin-operated amusement arcades c. Electronic game arcades (video games, etc.), d. Pool, billiards, escape room, mystery games e. Skating sports (ice, roller, board) This use does not include adult businesses. Four or more electronic games or coin- operated amusements in any establishment, or a premises where 50 percent or more of the floor area is occupied by amusement devices, are considered an electronic game arcade as described above; three or fewer machines are not considered a land use separate from the primary use of the site. Ancillary uses including meeting rooms, snack bars, and equipment rental or sales are permitted within an indoor recreation facility, provided that the gross floor area of the ancillary use does not exceed twenty percent (20%). Ancillary uses shall operate in conjunction with the primary recreation use, and shall maintain the same or fewer hours of operation. (21) Commercial Frontage: The non-residential frontage of a building. Non- residential activities subject to city approval are allowed within this space, which must be at least 25 feet in depth. These spaces are limited to the first floor and as such, have different building requirements than upper floors (e.g., large storefront windows, signage, etc.).     City Council 22 – 115 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 31 of 49 (22) Courtyard Housing: See 'Building Types' (23) Craft and specialized automotive restoration service: A specialized business or commercial enterprise occurring inside of a fully-enclosed structure that focuses on repairing and restoring older cars, often considered "collector cars" as defined by the State; which includes (1) a vehicle model 35+ years old, (2) a vehicle model 25+ years old with historic plates, or (3) a vehicle model classified as a special interest vehicle. Such restoration services return these types of vehicles to their original condition, including mechanical components, paint and bodywork, and interior, aiming to preserve their historical authenticity and aesthetic appeal. (24) Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc. office: A facility other than a hospital where medical, dental, mental health, surgical, and/or other personal health care ser- vices are provided on an outpatient basis, and that accommodates no more than four licensed primary practitioners (for example, chiropractors, medical doctors, psychiatrists, etc., other than nursing staff) within an individual office suite. (25) Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex: See 'Building Types' (26) Dwelling Unit Types: a. Apartment: A rental version of a Flat, Loft, or Townhouse. b. Condominium: An ownership version of a Flat, Loft or Townhouse c. Flat: A single-story unit. d. Loft: A double-story height unit with a mezzanine. e. Townhouse: A two to three-story unit. (27) Elevation (Building): The exterior walls of a building. Also referred to as 'Facade' when the elevation is along a frontage line. (28) Entrance (Main or Primary): The principal point of access of pedestrians to a building. In the support of pedestrian activity, the main or primary entrance should be oriented to the frontage rather than to the parking. Extended Care: Residential facilities providing nursing and health-related care as a primary use with in-patient beds. Examples of these uses include: board and care homes; convalescent and rest homes; extended care facilities; and skilled nursing facilities. Long-term personal care facilities that do not emphasize medical treatment are included under "Care Homes." (29) Facade: The exterior wall of a building that is set along a frontage line. Facades support the public realm and are subject to frontage requirements additional to those required of elevations. (30) Flex Block: See 'Building Types' (31) Forecourt: See ‘Frontage Types’     City Council 22 – 116 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 32 of 49 (32) Frontage Line: Those lot lines that coincide with a public street line. One shall be designated as the Principal Frontage Line. Facades along Frontage Lines define the public realm and are therefore more highly regulated than the elevations that coincide with other lot lines. Frontage lines are subject to the urban standards, architectural standards, signage standards, and subdivision standards. (33) Frontage Type: The architectural element of a building between the public right- of-way and the private property associated with the building. Frontage Types combined with the public realm create the perceptible streetscape. The following frontage types used in this Article are listed below: a. Arcade: A facade with an attached colonnade, that is covered by upper stories. This frontage type is ideal for retail use, but only when the sidewalk is fully absorbed within the arcade so that a pedestrian cannot bypass it. For Building Code considerations, this frontage type cannot cover the public right- of-way. b. Forecourt: A semi-public exterior space partially within the shopfront, gallery or arcade frontage that is partially surrounded by a building and also opening to a thoroughfare forming a court. The court is suitable for gardens, outdoor dining, vehicular drop-off and utility off-loading. c. Front yard / Porch: A common frontage type associated with single family houses, where the facade is set back from the right of way with a front yard. A porch may also be appended to the facade. A fence or wall at the property line may be used to define the private space of the yard. The front yard may also be raised from the sidewalk, creating a small retaining wall at the property line with entry steps to the yard. d. Gallery: A colonnade that is attached to storefronts and projects over the sidewalk. e. Shopfront: A facade placed at or close to the right-of-way line, with the entrance at sidewalk grade. This frontage type is conventional for retail front- age and is commonly equipped with cantilevered shed roof(s) or awning(s). Recessed storefronts are also acceptable. The absence of a raised ground floor precludes residential use on the ground floor facing the street, although such use is appropriate above. f. Stoop: An elevated entry porch that corresponds directly to the building entry, with stairs placed close to the frontage line on a building with the ground story elevated from the sidewalk, securing privacy for the windows and front rooms. This type is suitable for ground-floor residential uses with short set- backs. This type may be interspersed with the shopfront frontage type. A porch or shed roof may also cover the stoop. (34) Front yard/Porch: See 'Frontage Types' Furniture and Fixture Manufacturing, cabinet shop: The manufacture or assembly of high-grade articles of furniture and fixtures calling for fine finish, such as     City Council 22 – 117 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 33 of 49 decorative cabinets, desks and chairs, store fixtures and office equipment. In the production of such goods, noise above 60 dB CNEL beyond the walls of the building is prohibited. (35) Gallery: see ‘Frontage Types’ (36) General Retail: Stores and shops selling many lines of merchandise. Examples of these stores and lines of merchandise include: a. Art galleries, retail b. Art supplies, including framing services c. Bicycles, d. Books, magazines, and newspapers e. Cameras and photographic supplies f. Clothing, shoes, and accessories g. Department stores h. Drug stores and pharmacies i. Dry goods j. Fabrics and sewing supplies k. Florists and houseplant stores with indoor sales only l. Furniture and home décor stores m. Hardware and building supply stores n. Hobby materials o. Jewelry p. Luggage and leather goods q. Musical instruments (small), parts and accessories, large instruments are under “Furniture, Furnishings, and Appliance Store” r. Orthopedic supplies s. Small wares t. Specialty shops u. Sporting goods and equipment v. Stationery w. Toys and games x. Variety stores y. Videos, DVDs, records, CDs, including rental stores General retail does not include the following: a. Adult business as defined in section 41-1701.6 of the SAMC, antique or collectible stores, furniture, furnishings and appliance stores, medical marijuana dispensaries or second-hand stores. b. Sheet metal shops, body-fender works, automobile paint shops, repair garages, and any activity which includes the processing, treatment, manufacturing, assembling or compounding of any product, other than that which is clearly and traditionally incidental and essential to a particular retail activity.     City Council 22 – 118 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 34 of 49 c. Any use which is more specifically identified as a permitted use or as a use which may be permitted subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit or land use certificate in one or more use districts pursuant to this code. (37) Ground Floor/ Footprint: The area resulting from the application of building placement and open space requirements and as further articulated by particular building design. In calculating the area, only the conditioned floor space shall be counted for purposes of calculating allowable upper floor area, the area occupied by zaguans shall be counted as "ground floor/footprint." (38) Ground Floor Residential: Dwellings with their primary entrance and habitable space at grade. (39) Health and Fitness: A commercial establishment providing facilities for aerobic exercises, running and jogging, exercise equipment, game courts, swimming facilities, and saunas, showers and lockers. Health and fitness facilities may also provide for instruction programs and classes, such as martial arts, yoga where lockers and showers are provided. (40) Hotel (land use): A facility offering short-term lodging accommodations, as defined and regulated by the SAMC, to the general public and which may include additional facilities and services, such as restaurants, meeting rooms, entertainment, personal services and recreational facilities. Access to the guest rooms shall be through the main lobby of the building. A hotel shall contain more than 5 guest rooms. A hotel that contains a kitchen as defined by the California Building Code (CBC) in guest rooms shall be deemed to be a long term stay business hotel as defined by the SAMC. A hotel that meets the criteria of a transient/residential hotel as defined by the SAMC, shall be deemed to be a transient/residential hotel. (41) House: See 'Building Types' (42) House Scale: Multi-family building form that is derivative of and compatible with surrounding single-family houses and that can be applied in 1 to 4 direct- access assemblies of units to form larger buildings from duplex up to and including Courtyard Housing. (43) Hybrid Court: See 'Building Types' (44) Laboratory- medical-analytical: A place equipped for experimentation or observation in a field of study, or devoted to the application of scientific principles in testing and analysis. Quantities of biological or hazardous materials used in situ, shall be limited to those quantities established by the fire department Light Manufacturing: The manufacture or assembly of products from previously treated material where no impact is created to the adjacent uses and no hazardous materials are used in the production of such products. The maximum number of employees shall be 10. Examples of light manufacturing include: athletic equipment     City Council 22 – 119 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 35 of 49 bakeries camera, photo equipment clothing electronics musical instruments optical goods woodworking (limited) (45) Lined Block: See 'Building Types' (46) Live/Work: See 'Building Types' (47) Lot Width: The frontage of a parcel which is used to identify the parcel for street address purposes. (48) Media production: An establishment dedicated to the production of visual and audio mass media, including television, films, videos, video games, mobile devices, internet and digital interactive media, but excludes magazines, newspapers, and periodicals. (49) Mixed-Use Building: A structure lawfully containing residential and non- residential uses. (50) Multi-Family Building: A residential structure lawfully containing two or more dwelling units. (51) Net Developable Area: The private area defined by blocks which is not to remain for public uses such as Plazas, Greens, Squares, Thoroughfares or Streetscapes. (52) Nonconforming Industrial Use: A nonconforming use as defined in Section 41-126 of the SAMC that was established on any parcel or within any building located within the boundaries of SD-84 established by this Article that is listed in the uses permitted or uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit of Division 18. M-1 (Light Industrial) or Division 19. M-2 (Heavy Industrial) of this Chapter but that are no longer permissible through amendment to this Article. The terms “nonconforming use” and “legal nonconforming use” have the same meaning in the implementation of this Article. (53) Noxious Use: A nonconforming industrial use that is located within one thousand (1,000) linear feet of a public park, school (K-12) as defined by Section 11362.768 of the Health and Safety Code, or property used or zoned for residential purposes whose primary business operations involve any two (2) or more of the following: a. Emitting, generating, or discharging of particulate materials; exhausting emissions; or handling, storing, emitting or discharging regulated compounds, hazardous materials, chemicals, or substances; b. Operations that are regulated by and require a permit from a federal, state, or regional agency; c. Storing, processing, or disposing of listed or hazardous waste; or     City Council 22 – 120 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 36 of 49 d. Operations that are not contained within a fully enclosed building. (54) Office: These do not include medical offices (see Clinic, Urgent Care," and "Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc. office.") a. Service. Establishments providing direct services to consumers. Examples of these uses include employment agencies, insurance agent offices, real estate offices, travel agencies, utility company offices, elected official satellite offices, etc. This use does not include "Bank, Financial Services," which is separately defined. b. Administrative. Office-type facilities characterized by high employee densities, and occupied by businesses engaged in information processing, and other computer-dependent or telecommunications-based activities. Examples of these uses include: 1. airline, lodging chain, and rental car company reservation centers, not including retail travel agencies 2. computer software and hardware design and development 3. consumer credit reporting 4. data processing services 5. health management organization (HMO) offices where no medical services are provided 6. insurance claim processing 7. mail order and electronic commerce transaction processing 8. telecommunications facility design and management 9. telemarketing c. Professional. Office-type facilities occupied by businesses that provide professional services, or are engaged in the production of intellectual property. Examples of these uses include: 1. accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services 2. advertising agencies 3. attorneys 4. business associations, chambers of commerce 5. commercial art and design services 6. construction contractors (office facilities only) 7. counseling services 8. court reporting services 9. detective agencies and similar services 10. design services including architecture, engineering, landscape architecture, urban planning 11. educational, scientific and research organizations 12. financial management and investment counseling 13. literary and talent agencies 14. management and public relations services 15. media postproduction services 16. news services     City Council 22 – 121 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 37 of 49 17. photographers and photography studios 18. political campaign headquarters 19. psychologists 20. secretarial, stenographic, word processing, and temporary clerical employee services 21. security and commodity brokers 22. writers and artists offices (55) Paseo: a public place or path designed for walking; promenade. (56) Pedestrian First: The practice of addressing the needs of people, once out of their automobiles, through a series of interdependent urban design and streetscape principles (e.g., wide sidewalks, street trees and shade, on-street parking, outdoor dining, inviting storefronts, the feeling of being in an ‘outdoor room’, short cross- walk distances, interconnected and short blocks). (57) Pedestrian Shed: An area defined by the average distance that may be traversed at an easy pace from its edge to its center in approximately 5 minutes. This distance is used to determine the size of a neighborhood. This dimension averages one quarter of a mile or approximately 1,400 feet for generally flat terrain. (58) Personal Services: Establishments providing non-medical services to individuals as a primary use. Examples of these uses include: a. barber, nail salons and beauty shops b. clothing rental c. dry cleaning pick-up stores with limited equipment d. home electronics and small appliance repair e. locksmiths f. pet grooming with no boarding g. shoe repair shops h. tailors These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. (59) Personal Services - Restricted: Personal services that may tend to have a blighting and/or deteriorating effect upon surrounding areas and which may need to be dispersed to minimize their adverse impacts. Examples of these uses include: a. laundromats (self-service laundries). Laundromats shall comply with the development and performance standards set forth in Section 41-199. b. massage establishments (licensed, therapeutic) as defined on Section 41- 1751 of the SAMC. Massage establishments shall comply with Article XVII.I of Chapter 41 of the SAMC. c. Pawnshops. (60) Pet day care facility: Establishment offering daily, without overnight, care to a customer’s personal canine or feline pets. Grooming and educational training     City Council 22 – 122 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 38 of 49 may be allowed as an ancillary use within the establishment. Does not include veterinary care or treatment, hospitalizations, or long-term boarding of pets. (61) Planter: The layer of the streetscape which accommodates street trees. Planters may be continuous or individual according to the Thoroughfare and location within the neighborhood. (62) Podium: A continuous raised platform supporting a building, or a large block of two or three stories beneath a multi-layer block of a smaller area. (63) Porch: see ‘Frontage Types’ (64) Primary Use: A primary use is the principal and dominant activity that the business is devoted to, distinguishing it from a secondary or ancillary use as defined in Section 41-13.5 of the SAMC. (65) Private Frontage: The privately held layer between the frontage line and the principal building facade. The structures and landscaping within are held to specific standards. The variables of Private Frontage are the depth of the setback and the combination of architectural elements such as fences, stoops, porches and galleries. These elements influence social behavior in the public realm. The Frontage layer may overlap the public streetscape in the case of awnings, Galleries and Arcades. (66) Research and Development: A quasi-industrial facility where creative work is undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge generally in the fields of medicine, scientific instruments, safety- critical mechanism or high technology. These facilities may include pilot plant operations as an ancillary use, which shall not exceed 25 percent of the floor area. A facility providing full scale production shall be deemed a manufacturing use and shall be prohibited. (67) Rowhouse: See 'Building Types' (68) Setback: The area of a lot measured from a lot line to a building facade or elevation that must be maintained clear of permanent structures excepting galleries, fences, garden walls, arcades, porches, stoops, balconies, bay windows, and terraces which are permitted to encroach into the setback subject to the standards established in Division 3 of this Article. (69) Shared Parking (Park-Once Policy): An accounting for parking spaces that are avail- able to more than one function. The requirement is based on a range of parking- demand found in mature, mixed-use centers. The Shared Parking ratio varies according to multiple functions in close proximity unlikely to require the spaces at the same time. This approach to parking uses the following types of parking in combination to achieve a balanced and distributed supply of parking: off-street (surface lots and garages), on-street (parallel and diagonal). (70) Shopfront: see ‘Frontage Types’     City Council 22 – 123 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 39 of 49 (71) Stacked Dwellings: See 'Building Types' (72) Stoop: see ‘Frontage Types’ (73) Story: A habitable level within a building from finished floor to finished ceiling: Attics and basements, as defined by the California Building Code (CBC) are not considered a story for the purposes of determining building height and are subject to the applicable requirements of this code and the CBC, except for when the finished floor level directly above a basement or cellar is more than six feet above grade, such basement or cellar shall be considered a story (74) Streetscape: The urban element that provides the major part of the public realm as well as paved lanes for vehicles. A streetscape is endowed with two attributes: capacity and context. Capacity is the number of vehicles that can move safely through a segment within a given time period. It is physically manifested by the number of lanes and their width, and by the curb radius. (75) Studio: A workplace of one or more individuals who are engaged in the production of art, such as fine and fiber arts, lithography, calligraphy, photography, music, dance and the performing arts. Galleries, not to exceed 50 percent of the floor area, are permitted as an ancillary use. Any regulated use, as defined on Sec 41-191 of the SAMC is not allowed. Uses meeting the definition of artisan/craft product manufacturing shall be deemed an artisan/craft product manufacturing use. (76) Tandem Parking Stall: Two or more parking spaces arranged one behind the other. (77) Thoroughfare: A vehicular way incorporating moving lanes and parking lanes (except alleys/lanes which have no parking lanes) within a right-of-way. (78) Tower-on-Podium: See 'Building Types' (79) Trade school: A school consisting of vocational educational programs for students to be trained in the fields related to healthcare, technology, legal services, and professional trades. (80) Traffic-Calming: A set of techniques which serves to reduce the speed of traffic. Such strategies include lane-narrowing, on-street parking, chicanes, yield points, sidewalk bulge-outs, speed bumps, surface variations, mid-block deflections, and visual clues. Traffic calming is a retrofit technique unnecessary when thoroughfares are correctly designed for the appropriate speed at initial construction. (81) Transect: A system of classification deploying the conceptual range of ‘rural-to- urban’ to arrange in useful order, the typical context groupings of natural and urban areas. This gradient, when rationalized and subdivided into zones becomes the basis of the Regulating Plan and the 9 zones supporting this Plan.     City Council 22 – 124 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 40 of 49 (82) Transit-Oriented Development: A remedial pattern within a loose urbanized area. Its structure creates nodes at an efficient spacing for commuter or light rail. These nodes are mixed-use areas limited in extent by walking distance to the transit stop. These nodes are usually surrounded by a residential hinterland, structured as neighborhood T.O.D.’s connected by a feeder bus system. (83) Transition Line: A horizontal line, the full width of a facade expressed by a material change or by a continuous horizontal articulation such as a cornice or a balcony. (84) Tuck-under Housing: See 'Building Types' (85) Zaguan: A covered pedestrian passage between courts of one to two rooms in depth and one story in height.” Section 13. Any section or subsection of this Article, Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) that is not reprinted or modified by this ordinance is hereby unamended. Section 14. Any provision of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) or appendices thereto found inconsistent with the provisions of the Ordinance, only to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance, inclusive of corrections for typographical error, and shall be considered the same as if adopted at the time of this Ordinance. Section 15. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 16. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, Ordinance Nos. NS-3063 and NS- 3064 shall be automatically repealed and rescinded as of that date. Section 17. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2025. ________________________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor     City Council 22 – 125 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 41 of 49 APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: _________________________ Melissa M. Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: _________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: _________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, ____________________, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-_______ to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ___________________, 2025 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: ______________________ ________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana     City Council 22 – 126 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 42 of 49 EXHIBIT “A” A. On April 19, 2022, The City adopted an Amended General Plan. The Amended General Plan became effective on May 26, 2022 and adopted a new Land Use Plan for the City and established new land use designations and policies for development of the City. B. On April 16, 2024, the City Council passed an Urgency Ordinance to adopt a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (Moratorium Ordinance”). No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately protect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents and businesses from incompatible industrial uses that cause a significant pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD84 Zoning District. C. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). D. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted an extension of the Moratorium Ordinance for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the California Government Code, Section 65858. The extension was necessary to allow sufficient time for staff to continue with conduct research of appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to develop appropriate zoning regulation to address the impacts of industrial development in the SD84 Zoning District. E. The Planning and Building Agency routinely reviews its ordinances to incorporate best practices, reflect changes to State law, and address community needs. F. In adopting the Moratorium on April 16, 2024, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana established the following findings, all of which below remain true, applicable and necessary to support the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 amending certain portions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District: 1. The Transit Zoning Code (TZC), located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010, and amended on July 16, 2019; and     City Council 22 – 127 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 43 of 49 2. Upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; and 3. The goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian- oriented development framework to support the addition of new, and enhancement of existing communities through, transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and 4. Industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and 5. The TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were developed or improved to the mixed-use zones allowed by the TZC; and 6. Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called “disadvantaged communities”, in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision- making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and 7. The City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and 8. The Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana’s General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and 9. As required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and     City Council 22 – 128 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 44 of 49 10. Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and 11. The industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and 12. The Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican-American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century; and 13. The construction of Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in many families being displaced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and 14. In the 1970s, a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and 15. The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and 16. Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and 17. The updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan     City Council 22 – 129 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 45 of 49 or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, they are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations—both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and 18. There are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 35 commercial and industrial properties in the past twelve months and currently has 16 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and 19. In the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently near sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and 20. In the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently near sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the     City Council 22 – 130 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 46 of 49 area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and 21. There is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very- low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and 22. There is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor’s yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and 23. The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023 to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and 24. MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. Since adoption of the moratorium and its extension, MIG and City staff have focused the comprehensive update through an initial phase concentrating on amending the TZC; and 25. The policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and 26. Given these concerns, the City Council directed that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district.     City Council 22 – 131 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 47 of 49 G. Following said analysis of the City Council points of discussion as iterated above, City staff has prepared ZOA No. 2024-02 to amend and add certain sections to Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend non- conforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and non-conforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District. H. Amendments to Chapter 41 (Zoning) are necessary to ensure uniform and legally consistent regulations as well as additions to enable the City to implement a regulatory framework that protects the health, safety, and welfare of the City. I. The proposed amendments to the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) that are the subject of this Ordinance support the objectives and policies of the City’s General Plan and are required to ensure consistency in accordance with Government Code Section 65860. J. Specifically, these amendments to the SAMC timely address current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be inconsistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: 1. Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life; 2. Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; 3. Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and     City Council 22 – 132 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 48 of 49 polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance or elimination of those uses; 4. Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; 5. Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC; 6. Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit pollution near sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; 7. Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and 8. Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. K. Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: 1. LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. 2. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. 3. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. 4. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. 5. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community.     City Council 22 – 133 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 49 of 49 6. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. 7. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities related to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. L. ZOA No. 2024-02 amends and adds certain sections to Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including Section 41-2001 (Application of Article), Section 41-2001.5 (Organization), Section 41-2002 (Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses), Section 41-2004 (The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone), Section 41-2005 (Application for Discretionary Approvals), Section 41-2006 (Zones Established), Section 41-2007 (Uses Permitted) Section 41-2008 (Operational Standards for Permitted Uses), Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses), and Section 41-2080 (Definitions). M. On February 24, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this Ordinance, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and after closing the public hearing, continued taking any action on this Ordinance to a special meeting held on March 6, 2025, whereby the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Ordinance to the City Council. N. On April 1, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this Ordinance, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard.     City Council 22 – 134 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 1 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024-03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD-84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has, by separate action taken on April 1, 2025, adopted an Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact report (“EIR”) (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100), which was certified on June 7, 2010, by the City Council (“Addendum”). The Addendum analyzed the environmental impacts of the actions taken in this Ordinance. Adopting the Addendum satisfied the City Council’s obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) regarding amendments to the Transit Zoning Code and none of the conditions in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines 15162 apply. Thus , no further environmental review is required as adoption of this Ordinance falls within the scope of the adopted Addendum and previously certified EIR. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A.Chapter 41, Article I, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code provides that “Because of the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land; and regulating the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open spaces, the City is divided into land-use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulation s and provide for their enforcement. The regulations are considered necessary in order to: (a)Encourage the most appropriate use of land; (b)Conserve and stabilize property value, (c)Provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, (d)Prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and Exhibit 3 - Ordinance for Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03     City Council 22 – 135 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 2 of 7 (e) Promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City.” Consistent with this purpose, the City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map, which has since been amended from time to time. B. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted an Amended General Plan The Amended General Plan became effective on May 26, 2022 and adopted a new Land Use Plan for the City and established new land use designations and policies for development of the City. C. On April 16, 2024, the City Council passed an Urgency Ordinance to adopt a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Tr ansit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (the “Moratorium Ordinance”). The purpose of the Moratorium Ordinance was to immediately protect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents and businesses from incompatible industrial uses that cause a significant pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD -84 Zoning District. D. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Gove rnment Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code Specific Development No. 84. E. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted an extension of the Moratorium Ordinance for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to California Government Code, Section 65858. The extension was necessary to allow sufficient time for staff to continue with conduct research of appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to develop appropriate zoning regulation to address the impacts of industrial development in the SD -84 Zoning District. F. After continued research and study, two ordinances have been developed that address the impacts from industrial land uses in the SD -84 Zoning District. The ordinances address the following: a. Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 to amend certain provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and amend portions of the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amendment of non- conforming regulations; and, b. Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to remove the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties     City Council 22 – 136 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 3 of 7 within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City o f Santa Ana Zoning Map. G. AA No. 2024-03 is consistent with and implements the amendments proposed by ZOA No. 2024-02 by ensuring uniform and legally consistent mapping of the City’s Zoning Districts; and enables the City to implement a regulatory framework that protects the health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents. H. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map contained in AA No. 2024 - 03 are required to ensure consistency with the City’s General Plan in accordance with California Government Code, Section 65860. I. Adoption of AA No. 2024-03 is consistent with and implements the Amended General Plan. Specifically, it is consistent with the following: The amendments timely address current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. (a) Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), (b) Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development) (c) Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), (d) Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), (e) Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), (f) Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), (g) Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), (h) Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), (i) Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), (j) Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts); (k) Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), (l) Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and (m) Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development) which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: 1. Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life; 2. Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; 3. Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses;     City Council 22 – 137 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 4 of 7 4. Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; 5. Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC; 6. Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit increased pollution new sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; 7. Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and 8. Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that p hases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. J. Additionally, AA No. 2024-03 implements and/or contributes to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: 1. LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. 2. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. 3. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. 4. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. 5. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community.     City Council 22 – 138 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 5 of 7 6. HE5.C - Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. 7. HE44.A - Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. K. On February 24, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this Ordinance, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and after closing the public hearing, continued taking any action on this Ordinance to a special meeting held on March 6, 2025, whereby the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Ordinance to the City Council. L. On April 1, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this Ordinance, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts and approves the Amendment to the Official Zoning Map of the City of Santa Ana, as shown in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for City Council Action dated April 1, 2025, and exhibits attached hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.     City Council 22 – 139 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 6 of 7 ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2025. ________________________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: _________________________ Melissa M. Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: _________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: _________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, ____________________, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-_______ to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ___________________, 2025 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: ______________________ ________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana     City Council 22 – 140 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 7 of 7 Exhibit A     City Council 22 – 141 4/1/2025 1 EXHIBIT 4 Environmental Health Reports EXHIBIT 4.1- Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA-EPA) The map illustrates Disadvantaged Communities within Santa Ana as identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), with the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods shown in red in the central core of the city. The map below highlights the Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) within the City of Santa Ana, with both Logan and Lacy neighborhoods falling into that category. The CalEPA has responsibility for identifying those communities and CalEPA’s designation of disadvantaged communities must be based on “geographic, socioeconomic, public he alth, and environmental hazard” criteria. CalEPA DACs affect an entire or a portion of thirty-three of Santa Ana’s neighborhoods. Exhibit 4 - Environmental Health Data and Reports     City Council 22 – 142 4/1/2025 2 EXHIBIT 4.2- Center for Disease Control/ Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ ATSDR) The CDC/ATSDR Environmental Justice Index Map illustrates environmental health burdens in Santa Ana's Lacy neighborhood. The data shows significant environmental justice concerns, with the area ranking high (0.89) for overall air pollution impacts. Specifically, the neighborhood shows elevated exposure levels for Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 (0.97), Diesel Particulate Matter (0.76), and Air Toxics Cancer Risk (0.76).     City Council 22 – 143 4/1/2025 3 EXHIBIT 4.2- Center for Disease Control/ Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ ATSDR) (Continued) The CDC/ATSDR Environmental Justice Index Map demonstrates significant environmental burdens in Santa Ana's Logan neighborhood. The data indicates high environmental justice concerns, with an air pollution ranking of 0.90. Specifically, the area shows severe exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 (0.97), Diesel Particulate Matter (0.76), and Air Toxics Cancer Risk (0.78).     City Council 22 – 144 4/1/2025 4 EXHIBIT 4.3- City of Santa Ana Overview, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The EPA's Environmental Justice screening map illustrates the City of Santa Ana's environmental burden distribution. This data aligns with CalEnviroScreen 4.0 findings and highlights the concentration of environmental impacts in the central urban core, where industrial uses continue to affect long-established residential communities.     City Council 22 – 145 4/1/2025 5 EXHIBIT 4.3.1- Particulate Matter (PM 2.5) for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 reflecting a heavy burden of 95% and above in the percentile score     City Council 22 – 146 4/1/2025 6 EXHIBIT 4.3.2- Air Toxics Cancer Risk for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The EPA’s Environmental Justice map and screening tool uses national consistent data combining environmental and demographic indicators in maps and reports. The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Air Toxics Cancer Risk, reflecting at 90% or higher.     City Council 22 – 147 4/1/2025 7 EXHIBIT 4.3.3- Hazardous Waste Proximity for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Hazardous Water Proximity, showing a percentile of 95% or above.     City Council 22 – 148 4/1/2025 8 EXHIBIT 4.3.4- Diesel Particulate Matter for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Diesel Particulate Matter indicating percentiles above 90%.     City Council 22 – 149 4/1/2025 9 EXHIBIT 4.3.5- Toxic Release to Air for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The map below indicates the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Toxic Releases to Air showing a high percentile score of 90%.     City Council 22 – 150 4/1/2025 10 EXHIBIT 4.4- City of Santa Ana Overview, Healthy Places Index (HPI) The Healthy Places Index (HPI) comprises a data and policy platform to advance equitable community investments, develop critical programs and policies and advance health equity through open and accessible data. The map below captures the City of Santa Ana, which indicates that the majority of the City of Santa Ana’s neighborhoods rank on the LOW scale of the healthy community conditions, as seen in the dark blue and light blue layers.     City Council 22 – 151 4/1/2025 11 EXHIBIT 4.4- City of Santa Ana Overview, Healthy Places Index (HPI), Lacy Neighborhood (Continued) Using the HPI mapping tool, the Lacy neighborhood ranks at a 9.6% of the least healthy community conditions.     City Council 22 – 152 4/1/2025 12 EXHIBIT 4.4- City of Santa Ana Overview, Healthy Places Index (HPI), Logan Neighborhood (Continued) Using the HPI mapping tool, the Logan neighborhood ranks on the LOW end, showing nearly 11% of the least healthy community conditions.     City Council 22 – 153 4/1/2025 13 EXHIBIT 4.5- CalEnviroScreen 4.0- Logan and Lacy Neighborhoods The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 provides an insight into vulnerable communities that are most affected by pollution burdens, with special consideration on race and ethnicity. The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana at 90% or above as being burdened by pollution.     City Council 22 – 154 4/1/2025 1 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. SD-84/Transit Zoning Code (TZC) Moratorium and Ordinance Amendment Frequently Asked Questions This document provides information about the Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84) zoning district, otherwise known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), moratorium and the proposed ordinance amendment. Please note, the information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only. Interested parties should review the proposed Moratorium text and the Ordinance text for detailed information and applicability. 1.When does the moratorium expire? The Transit Zoning Code (TZC/ SD-84) is a special zoning district in central Santa Ana designed to create a pedestrian-friendly, transit-oriented community while protecting existing neighborhoods. TZC industrial moratorium began with Ordinance No. NS-3063 on April 16, 2024, as a 45-day urgency measure. The City Council then adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 on May 21, 2024, extending the moratorium for an additional ten months and fifteen days. The current moratorium will expire on April 15, 2025. 2.Why was the moratorium adopted? The City Council adopted the TZC industrial moratorium on April 16, 2024 to immediately protect public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses causing significant pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the TZC district. The action addressed historical land use conflicts in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, where industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, expanded, or intensified despite the area's 2010 transit-oriented zoning designation. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data confirms these neighborhoods rank at 90 percent or above among California's most pollution-burdened communities, with documented exposure to various environmental hazards. The existing Industrial Overlay Zone (I-OZ) created inconsistencies with the General Plan's mixed-use designations and allowed industrial uses to continue operating near residential areas. 3. What impact does the moratorium have on business permits and future development? The moratorium prohibits the establishment of new, or expansion or intensification of existing, industrial businesses within the TZC. Existing industrial businesses can obtain permits for work that is for routine maintenance, or of a similar nature, that does not result in new, expanded or intensified use. The moratorium does not impact residential, commercial, or mixed-use development in the TZC plan area. 4. How does the proposed permanent ordinance to amend the TZC propose to regulate industrial intensification within the plan area? The ordinance would remove the industrial overlay and remove industrial type uses from the permitted uses table in the TZC. The removal of the overlay and of industrial type uses from the permitted uses table would render all existing industrial businesses within the plan area as nonconforming, thereby prohibiting the expansion of the existing industrial businesses and the establishment of new industrial businesses in the plan area. Moreover, the ordinance would prohibit intensification of nonconforming industrial uses, meaning the businesses would be prohibited from expanding operations that result in more potential impacts. 5.Does this impact commercial businesses or residential uses? The proposed amendments primarily address industrial uses within the TZC district. Commercial businesses that are Exhibit 5 - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)     City Council 22 – 155 4/1/2025 2 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. compatible with mixed-use and transit-oriented development will continue to be permitted uses in the TZC. The amendments aim to enhance the compatibility between residential areas and neighboring businesses by removing industrial uses that create environmental and health impacts. These changes support the original 2010 TZC vision of creating a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework that strengthens the area's mixed-use character while protecting existing residential neighborhoods. The amendments focus on safeguarding the residential communities in the area from industrial impacts while maintaining appropriate commercial activities that serve neighborhood needs. 6. How does this ordinance compare to similar policies in other cities? Most cities, including the City of Santa Ana, regulate nonconforming uses and structures. Several cities also include abatement or amortization processes to further regulate and terminate nonconforming uses and structures to advance overall land use policy direction. A few cities target termination of specific nonconformities, such as adult entertainment, industrial uses, and billboards or other types of signage, or certain types of buildings or structures. The City of National City has a well-established industrial amortization program, reviewing and ranking various businesses to be prioritized for amortization. 7. What are the differences between the M1 and M2 overlay, and how does it impact businesses within each zone? The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone is currently applied to areas that were zoned M1 (Light Industrial) or M2 (Heavy Industrial) and occupied with an industrial use when the TZC was originally adopted in 2010. As written, this overlay allows the type of land use activity and development permitted by the M1 and M2 zoning districts to continue until such time that the owner chooses to develop to the standards in the new residential and mixed-use zones that were applied to all of the properties within the plan area when the TZC was originally adopted. In order to determine if the M1 or M2 land use activity and development apply to a particular parcel, the I-OZ was further identified on the regulating plan (map) as I-OZ-M1 or I-OZ- M2. 8. Why is the City considering permitting residential on industrial properties? All of the properties within the TZC were assigned zones that permit residential and/or mixed-use development in 2010, when the plan was originally adopted. The proposed ordinance would not change or affect the zones that are already applicable to the properties within the boundary of the TZC. Rather, the proposed ordinance would simply remove the industrial overlay that was applied to certain properties within the plan area that had existing industrial businesses when the plan was adopted in 2010. 9. Why does the proposed ordinance prohibit the conversion of residential land uses or buildings to non-residential uses in the UN-1 and UN-2 zones of the TZC? UN-1 and UN-2 zones are applied to primarily residential areas intended to accommodate a variety of housing types, with some opportunities for live-work, neighborhood serving retail and cafes. The proposed ordinance would prohibit the conversion of residential uses/building to non-residential uses in these areas to strengthen and stabilize the low intensity residential nature of these     City Council 22 – 156 4/1/2025 3 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. neighborhoods, while still allowing some limited neighborhood-serving commercial uses on properties that are already non-residential in nature. 10. How will this ordinance affect businesses that want to sell or transfer ownership to future owners? As proposed, the ordinance will not affect the transferability of nonconforming industrial uses, as defined in the ordinance, to future owners. However, the nonconforming status of a business that meets the definition of a Noxious Use, as defined in the TZC, would lose its nonconforming status when the business ownership changes or if it meets the code enforcement thresholds established in the proposed ordinance. 11. How does the City determine when a business has transferred to new ownership? All businesses operating in commercial locations must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy (COO) from the Planning Division before receiving a business license, while those in residential areas must secure a Home Occupation Permit. A new COO is required whenever a business changes its use, changes ownership, changes location, expands, or changes its name. Businesses that do not apply and obtain a COO may face code enforcement action. 12. What is a nonconforming use? A nonconforming use is a use that was lawful when established but became unlawful due to new or amended ordinances. These uses are sometimes referred to as "grandfathered" uses and are typically allowed to continue without expansion or intensification. The SAMC defines “nonconforming uses” generally as uses initiated before July 20, 1960, or those that were compliant with applicable provisions when established but later became nonconforming due to code changes or public agency property acquisition. 13. What is amortization? Amortization is a tool that provides a reasonable transition period for owners to phase out a nonconforming use. This "grace period" allows owners to recoup their investments before the use must cease, and serves as a lawful equivalent to “just compensation.” Under the proposed ordinance, the City may consider amortizing certain nonconforming industrial uses based on factors enumerated in the ordinance. If the City elects to eliminate a use through amortization, a reasonable amortization period would be determined by an independent hearing officer be based on an individualized assessment. 14. The proposed ordinance references the use of a Hearing Officer for determining amortization periods in cases where the City elects to pursue elimination of a business/use through that mechanism. Who serves as hearing officer and what educational/professional background do they have? Hearing officers typically possess a background in law, urban planning, public administration, or a related field, and are already on retainer by the City of Santa Ana to adjudicate certain code enforcement appeals and other matters. Cities often utilize hearing officers to provide a neutral and impartial forum for dispute resolution, thereby increasing procedural fairness and public trust. Additionally, hearing officers often bring specialized expertise in navigating complex regulatory frameworks, which can streamline the hearing process and lead to more informed decision-making. The proposed ordinance requires that any hearing officer retained for the purposes of administering the amortization provisions must possess land use and legal background.     City Council 22 – 157 4/1/2025 4 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. 15. What industrial businesses would be considered nonconforming if the ordinance were adopted as proposed? The proposed ordinance defines nonconforming industrial use as a use established on any parcel or within any building located within the boundaries of the TZC that is listed in the uses permitted or uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit of the M1 (Light Industrial) or M2 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts but that are no longer permissible through the proposed amendment. As such, all industrial businesses would be considered nonconforming if the ordinance were adopted as proposed. 16. What are the differences between a nonconforming industrial use and a noxious use? A nonconforming industrial use is a use established on any parcel or within any building located within the boundaries of TZC that is listed in the uses permitted or uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit of the M1 (Light Industrial) or M2 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts but that are no longer permissible through the proposed amendment. A noxious use, as the term is defined and used in the proposed ordinance, is a nonconforming industrial use that is located within one thousand (1,000) linear feet of a public park, school (K-12) as defined by Section 11362.768 of the Health and Safety Code, or property used or zoned for residential purposes whose primary business operations involve any two or more of the following: 1) Emitting, generating, or discharging of particulate materials; exhausting emissions; or handling, storing emitting or discharging regulated compounds, hazardous materials, chemicals, or substances; 2) Operations that are regulated by and require a permit from a federal, state, or regional agency; 3) Storing, processing, or disposing of listed or hazardous waste; or 4) Operations that are not contained within a fully enclosed building. If an existing industrial business does not meet the criteria included in the definition of a noxious use, then it is considered a nonconforming industrial use. However, if the nonconforming industrial use meets the criteria of noxious use, then the business is also considered a noxious use. 17. How is artisan/craft product – limited production defined in the proposed ordinance? Artisan/craft product - limited production is defined as a specialized commercial facility with a retail-facing operation open to the public. Products are typically made by hand or with a restricted level of automation demonstrating an artistic skill. On-site production of artisan/craft product activities include design, production, processing, printing, assembly, treatment, testing, repair, and packaging, as well as any incidental storage. Typical artisan/craft products include, but are not limited to, electronics, food products, furniture-making, beverages, leather products, clocks and watches, jewelry, clothing/apparel, metal work, furniture and fine woodworking, glass, ceramics, paper and paper products, soaps, perfumes, and lotions, together with ancillary training and/or educational program activities. 18. What adjustments can be made to operational business hours to mitigate noise concerns? The proposed ordinance does not include language modifying noise standards. However, the proposed ordinance does include hours of operation that would apply to nonconforming industrial uses, which would limit noise impacts experienced by residents of the area. The TZC currently requires approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for any business operating between 12:00 a.m. (midnight) and 7:00 a.m. During the CUP consideration process, the Planning     City Council 22 – 158 4/1/2025 5 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Commission may approve specific conditions of approval to address individual noise concerns on a per-application basis. 19. Can the City require a CUP and conditions of approval for noise regulation to existing nonconforming industrial businesses as done for late-night establishments? A CUP and conditions of approval cannot be applied retroactively. The TZC currently requires a conditional use permit for late-night operations, and through Planning Commission approval of conditions of approval, noise-generating activities can be addressed on a per-application basis. 20. How were noise level limits determined, and do they align with City standards? There are no proposed modifications to the TZC’s existing noise standards. 21. What standards are proposed to mitigate air contaminants from industrial businesses? The proposed TZC amendments require all operations to be conducted within enclosed buildings, with measures to prevent dust, smoke, and other air contaminants. While businesses must comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permit requirements, it's important to note that regulatory agencies rely on self-reported emissions data rather than independent measurements. The City's standards require enclosed operations, proper materials handling, and controlled loading activities. For specific requirements, please refer to Section 41- 2009 of the proposed ordinance regarding Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses. 22. How does truck idling impact the environment, and how can it be controlled? Truck idling releases high levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM 2.5), contributing to respiratory diseases, cardiovascular illnesses, and increased cancer risks, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 2023) and California Air Resources Board (CARB, 2023). While anti-idling laws exist, enforcement by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is limited due to resource constraints and the requirement for in-person violation confirmation, making stricter enforcement and alternative mitigation strategies essential (SCAQMD, 2024). 23. What role do external agencies play in regulating businesses in this area? Several agencies regulate air and water quality to protect public health and the environment. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets national air quality standards under the Clean Air Act (CAA), while California Air Resources Board (CARB) enforces statewide pollution and emissions regulations. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) oversees regional air quality compliance in Southern California through permitting, monitoring, and enforcement programs. Additionally, the California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) and its regional boards regulate industrial wastewater discharge and water pollution under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act to safeguard water resources. 24. Are these agencies issuing and enforcing permits for air quality and other regulations? Yes, businesses must obtain emissions permits under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and CARB regulations, with periodic reporting required to maintain compliance. However, the City’s experience with these outside agencies shows that enforcement is often limited, as violations must be witnessed     City Council 22 – 159 4/1/2025 6 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. in real time by an inspector, who may take up to three hours to respond, with restricted weekend availability. Additionally, video evidence of violations is not accepted under current policies, making enforcement more challenging. 25. Is there ongoing air quality testing in the TZC? Yes. Air quality monitoring in this area is conducted through multiple agencies. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) provides regular monitoring and responds to community complaints. The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data tracks ongoing pollution measurements, confirming these neighborhoods rank in the 90th percentile for pollution burden. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) environmental justice mapping provides additional air quality monitoring data. 26. How are violations currently tracked, and what code enforcement reports exist? City staff have an internal process established which tracks and monitors incoming notice of compliance and notice of violations given to a particular business/operator from federal, state, or regional regulatory agencies. However, this process is dependent on the collaborative communication with external regulatory agencies’ reports and enforcement, which has been limited. 27. What measurable environmental impacts justify this ordinance? Data from CalEnviroScreen 4.0 ranks the TZC plan area among the top 90 percent of California’s most pollution-impacted areas, with high emissions from toxic releases, traffic, and diesel particulate matter. According to the EPA and CDC, prolonged exposure to these pollutants has led to 58 percent of children suffering from asthma, 84 percent of newborns having low birth weight, and 49 percent of residents experiencing cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, asthma-related emergency room visits in TZC are 117 percent higher than in the nearby city of Tustin (CDHHS, 2019), underscoring the urgent need for stricter air quality regulations. 28. Can the City address environmental concerns in the area without displacing or forcing businesses to relocate/close? The proposed ordinance aims to address the quality-of-life issues experienced by residents in the area through adoption of operating and development standards that would be applicable to industrial businesses, and by establishing a framework for amortization that the City may use for businesses that meet certain factors. Nonconforming industrial uses that comply with all applicable standards, would be permitted to remain in their current location and would not be forced to relocate or close. 29. What programs or alternative solutions exist for impacted businesses? Impacted businesses can continue to operate in their current locations, provided they comply with all applicable operating and development standards. 30. How does this ordinance affect financial factors such as jobs, tax revenue, economic growth? The proposed ordinance amendments do not require any immediate closure of businesses within the affected area. Should individual business owners and property owners elect to modify business operations, cease operations, or redevelop properties with new uses, financial factors would be evaluated on a per-application basis. Therefore, estimating any financial impacts of the proposed ordinance would be speculative.     City Council 22 – 160 4/1/2025 7 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. 31. What steps have been taken to ensure effective community engagement? The City has implemented a community engagement strategy that includes multiple formats and opportunities for participation. Since April 16, 2024, engagement efforts have included a community information meeting at the Santa Ana Train Station; regular in-person meetings at City Hall with business stakeholders and residents, together, with opportunities for discussion; field visits to affected neighborhoods have allowed for direct observation and community input in context; and tours of industrial businesses. The Planning Commission Study Session and subsequent public hearings have and will also offer formal venues for community feedback. Additionally, the City maintains a dedicated project webpage (www.santa-ana.org/transit- zoning-code-update/) that provides regular updates, meeting materials, and upcoming engagement opportunities, as well as contact information for project staff. Additional outreach has included neighborhood-specific sessions with Lacy and Logan residents, one-on-one consultations, direct email communications, phone calls, and coordination through the Environmental Justice Action Committee. 32. How does this ordinance promote common ground among stakeholders? The City ensured business owners and residents were informed about the meetings through door-to-door canvassing by City staff, as well as announcements on the City’s website, NextDoor, Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services’ (NIES) Mailer, and the NIES Newsletter. These efforts facilitated open communication and engagement, fostering collaboration among stakeholders. 33. How can the public be involved in the process? The public can participate through multiple channels. Community members can attend public hearings and Planning Commission meetings, visit the project webpage at www.santa-ana.org/transit-zoning-code-update/ for current information and updates, and contact the Planning Division directly with questions or concerns. The City continues to hold focused community meetings and maintains open communication with residents, business owners, and stakeholders throughout this process. 34. What additional outreach efforts should be made before implementation? The City has established robust interdepartmental and interagency coordination to support implementation. The City maintain active collaboration with Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) regarding safety compliance and emergency response planning, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for technical guidance on air quality monitoring and compliance. Internal coordination continues between City departments including the Planning Division, Code Enforcement Division, Santa Ana Police Department, and the Public Works Agency to ensure comprehensive implementation oversight. The City's Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services team coordinates with federal and state agencies including CalEPA's Environmental Justice Team and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to identify additional resources and support for affected communities. The Environmental Justice Action Committee, comprising residents, community organizations, and agency representatives, helps guide implementation priorities. Given these established partnerships and communication channels, the City is prepared to move forward with implementation while maintaining these collaborative relationships to ensure effective oversight and responsive community support.     City Council 22 – 161 4/1/2025 8 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. 35. How does the TZC compare to the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area? The TZC area and West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area have fundamentally different General Plan land use designations and regulatory frameworks. The TZC was established in 2010 with mixed-use General Plan designations throughout, but retained an Industrial Overlay Zone (I-OZ) that allowed industrial uses to continue, creating inconsistencies. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area has its own distinct General Plan designations and does not have an industrial overlay. The proposed ordinance would remove the TZC's Industrial Overlay Zone, bringing its zoning into alignment with its mixed-use General Plan designations and supporting the area's intended transit-oriented, pedestrian-friendly development pattern. 36. Will this process be applied to other parts of the City? The proposed ordinance amendments will only affect the area zoned as the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84). The City is also underway with a comprehensive Zoning Code Update, which is a separate and ongoing effort to update and modernize the City’s Zoning Code to reflect the goals and values of the General Plan Update from 2022. 37. What type of environmental document pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) will be prepared for this project? The City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that the proposed ordinance and map amendment are subject to CEQA guidelines and regulations (Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21000-21177). An Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearing House (SCH) No. 2006071100) has been prepared by the City to evaluate the impacts of the proposed ordinance amendments.     City Council 22 – 162 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/pb Item # 1 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Planning Commission Staff Report February 24, 2025 Topic: Resolution to make findings and adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024- 03 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) addressing industrial land uses, nonconformities, and operating standards, and amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 district boundary. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Recommend that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD-84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non-conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non-conforming uses. 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Exhibit 6 - February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report and Exhibits     City Council 22 – 163 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 2 3 3 6 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD- 84 Zoning District. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the moratorium. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code as necessary to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Based upon this City Council direction, and the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared Ordinances amending certain sections of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District. The first Ordinance proposes amendments that would modify the list of land uses and permit types, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations, including the addition of an amortization process/termination of use process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps. The second Ordinance deletes the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. DISCUSSION The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development No. 84 The Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The TZC includes the Civic Center, Downtown, and the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and as established residential communities. The TZC is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. Prior to the implementation of the TZC, the area consisted of a wide range of civic, commercial, industrial, and residential land uses regulated by varying zoning districts. In June 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2804, creating the TZC, which purpose was to establish a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the         City Council 22 – 164 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 3 3 3 6 7 existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. In July 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2970, amending the TZC to modify certain design criteria regulating height, massing, open space location, driveway standards, lot dimensions, and parking alternatives. The amendment did not include changes to land uses or permit types within the TZC. When originally adopted, the TZC provided new zoning for all properties contained within its boundary. However, some properties with existing M1 and M2 zoning and/or exiting industrial businesses, also received an overlay district designation which allowed for the continuation of industrial land uses on those properties. The development of mixed-use on these properties consistent with the new zoning they received as part of the TZC adoption is at the discretion of the property owner. In support of the TZC, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. However, due to the continued application of the industrial overlay zones within the TZC, the implementation of the new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts with the new General Plan. Since establishment of the TZC, and specifically in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, undergone expansions or intensifications, and have continued to create numerous land use conflicts and disturbances that affect surrounding residential communities. Specifically, in the Logan neighborhood alone, these land uses create quality of life, health and safety, and other trespass issues for residential properties that often directly abut these industrial land uses. These issues include odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts that have taken place for nearly a decade and a half despite the change to the new General Plan land use designations. Historically Disadvantaged Communities and Senate Bill (SB) 1000 Prior to the adoption of the TZC, the City permitted industrial uses within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools. The Logan neighborhood represents one of Orange County’s oldest barrios, established as early as 1886, and was one of the few areas where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent could purchase land due to racially restrictive covenants during the first half of the 20th century. Further, as a neighborhood, the area was established before the modern practice of separating or regulating impactful land uses, also known as zoning. The Logan neighborhood itself was largely settled by 1900, before the practice of zoning was enshrined by Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926. By that time, the neighborhood contained a mix of residential, industrial, commercial, and related land uses, in some cases side-by-side, with issues further exacerbated by rail lines, fuel storage depots, and the construction of the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5) between 1947 and 1956.         City Council 22 – 165 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 4 3 3 6 7 Comprehensive data analysis and mapping tools generated by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), the Center for Diseases Control/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and California Healthy Places Index (HPI) reveal concerning information regarding environmental conditions impacting residents in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Recent CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data confirms that these neighborhoods rank at 90 percent or above among California’s most pollution-burdened communities, with Environmental Justice (EJ) maps showing higher exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Air Toxics Cancer Risk, Hazardous Waste Proximity, Diesel Particulate Matter, and Toxic Releases to Air. This information is included as Exhibit 4 to this staff report. These multiple sources of environmental exposure and pollution burden communities of color, including the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, present an alarming set of challenges that affect residents’ quality of life and life expectancy with continued heavy industrial uses nearby. Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2016, requiring local governments to address pollution and other hazards that disproportionately impact low-income and communities of color within their jurisdiction to proactively plan for and address environmental concerns when developing and updating components of the General Plan. The City and community worked to ensure that the new General Plan included SB 1000 requirements of addressing EJ through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options. Of note, the City’s new General Plan mixed- use land use designations in the TZC area were largely left intact, including those in the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods, when the General Plan Update was adopted in 2022. Environmental Justice/Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Profile: Logan and Lacy Neighborhood Impacts For the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, incompatible land uses allowed from past zoning decisions, including the industrial overlay zones, have perpetuated the practices of locating industrial uses or other noxious and unwanted uses near communities of color. The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods have a population of 5,907 within 1,564 households, a median household income of $56,864, average household size of nearly four persons, median age 27 years, and per-capita income of $23,495. Seventy-four percent are renter- occupied units based on demographic forecasts for 2023. Nearly 25 percent of the population is under 14 years of age and 14 percent are 55 years of age and older. Nearly three percent of the population attended up to 12th grade with no diploma, over 31 percent         City Council 22 – 166 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 5 3 3 6 7 are high school graduates, and nearly 97 percent of the working population over 16 years of age are employed.1 These data illustrate that the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model. Failure to address ongoing irreconcilable land use conflicts that are the target of this moratorium will further exacerbate the ongoing demographic and environmental justice challenges that these two neighborhoods within the TZC have grappled with since their founding. Code Enforcement and Immediate Ongoing Issues In the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the TZC, the Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 35 commercial and industrial properties in the past 12 months and currently has 16 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. These violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby. Since June 2023, the TZC communities have experienced a marked increase in impacts stemming from the irreconcilable industrial and residential land use conflicts in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Residents in the TZC have voiced and emailed complaints and public health concerns to City staff regarding emitted contaminants and zoning violations from industrial businesses in the neighborhoods. Concerns that range from air pollution and smoke, toxic release exposures, idling trucks on residential streets, lead exposure, illegal storage, unpermitted uses, loud noise at night, and other property maintenance pose an immediate public health threat that is straining public resources to continuously investigate and address these matters. Specifically, a fire incident at a crematory located in the neighborhood alarmed neighbors at 9:18 p.m. on August 29, 2023. Residents shared with City officials’ video of high flames escaping the stack on the rooftop, screeching noise that continued nonstop for ten minutes, and what was described as a foul odor attributed to the fire. As City staff followed up with external regulatory agencies issuing permits to operate this facility, and quickly, staff observed the limitations from regulatory agencies and their compartmentalized processes to investigate and act on enforcement measures. On August 9, 2024, the City received a complaint with photos of 1 ESRI Community Analyst summary data, which utilizes U.S. Census Bureau sources (2017-2021 American Community Survey & 2020 Decennial Census Data), enhanced by ESRI’s forecasts and aggregations, covering demographics like population, income, age, and employment.         City Council 22 – 167 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 6 3 3 6 7 the the same crematory in which the complainant observed bodies stored in a container outside the facility. A City code enforcement inspector issued an abatement notice that same day; the bodies and container were removed and the case was closed on August 13, 2024 by code enforcement staff. Since 2022, the City has enhanced community services by restructuring its Planning Division to contain a Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section, which oversees, among other functions, environmental justice efforts in Santa Ana and regional coordination to address such issues. Staff encountered difficulty in achieving desired enforcement outcomes with external regulatory agencies such as South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Department of Consumer Affairs Cemetery and Funeral Bureau (CFB), and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) with several heavy industrial business operators in the TZC. This is supported through internal correspondence and phone conversations with staff from these agencies to understand their investigation and compliance processes. To address issues of industrial operators, including recycling and waste processing facilities near schools and residential areas, the City adopted new regulations such as a Noxious Uses Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS- 3044, adopted June 20, 2023) to include a notification requirement to the City by the property owner to obtain a permit from a regulatory public agency; a requirement of a 1,000 linear foot distance buffer measured from the outermost boundary of the subject property; and a conditional use permit requirement from a regulatory public agency to handle, store, emit, or discharge particulate materials, exhaust emissions, or regulated compounds, or chemicals near a public park, school (K-12), or property zoned for residential purposes. City staff have also researched commercial real estate acquisition data and current for- sale properties to identify any trends that could potentially generate an increase in the application of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance for proposed or expanded industrial uses. From September 2022 to date, 15 properties (six commercial, three office, and six industrial businesses) sold. Three of those businesses (800-808 E. Washington Avenue, 1045 N. Fuller Street, and 923 N. Logan Street) are located in the Logan neighborhood. Currently, multi-tenant industrial and manufacturing warehouse spaces on the market for lease located in the TZC. Recent City Council Actions and Direction to Address TZC Land Use Conflicts On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the TZC through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the TZC. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the moratorium.         City Council 22 – 168 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 7 3 3 6 7 On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code as necessary to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. As part of its approval, the City Council expressed a desire for City staff to begin evaluating permanent solutions to the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area in as timely a manner as possible, which resulted in immediate evaluation of the zoning code text and map amendments consistent with direction provided for City Council consideration as part of this request. Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the Moratorium, City staff conducted an interagency meeting that included representatives from multiple City departments: the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Additionally, engagement with additional agencies such as the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD), Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities interface with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that application of the moratorium affects approximately 127 industrial businesses in the TZC. All businesses must obtain appropriate permits before operating: commercial locations require a Certificate of Occupancy from the Planning Department, while residential-based operations need a Home Occupation Permit. Of the affected businesses, approximately three have active applications for permits, primarily seeking to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties. City staff reviewed public safety data from SAPD and OCFA to assess community concerns regarding emergency responses in the TZC. SAPD records show a total of 18,736 calls for service between March 2023 and July 2024, with 226 of those occurring between April and July 2024 within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. These calls encompassed a wide range of incidents, including patrol checks, disturbances, and traffic- related issues. Notably, 1,909 calls involved collisions, vehicle impoundments, domestic violence, and SAMC violations. OCFA data from 2022 to August 2024 indicates 238 calls for advanced life support emergencies. In 2022, 29 calls were related to respiratory issues, chest pain, and cardiac arrest, with a subsequent 7-percent increase in health- related calls in 2023. While the data reflects a broad spectrum of emergency responses, the concentration of industrial businesses in the TZC raises the possibility that some of these calls, particularly those related to respiratory issues and traffic incidents, may be influenced by industrial operations. Further analysis is needed to determine the specific correlation between industrial activity and public safety concerns in the area.         City Council 22 – 169 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 8 3 3 6 7 OCFA data for 2024 reported 312 service calls in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. A substantial majority, exceeding 250, were EMS-related, indicating a high demand for emergency medical services. Other incidents included traffic and pedestrian accidents, fire responses (including unauthorized burning and a brush fire), and alarm activations. Some calls were cancelled or resulted in 'no incident found,' suggesting potential areas for improved dispatch accuracy. The volume and variety of these calls highlight the impact of the area's mixed land use, where dense residential areas, commercial activity, and industrial operations contribute to a wide range of emergency response needs. Currently, City staff have an internal process established which tracks and monitors incoming notice of compliance and notice of violations given to a particular business/operator. City Code Enforcement activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance continue being monitored at these facilities. Code Enforcement staff data reports show enforcement activity beyond the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the moratorium, 16 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. Recent code enforcement complaints on properties in the Logan neighborhood involve complaints for recurring unpermitted work and land use violations that involve large commercial vehicles blocking street access and impacting nearby residents. Code Enforcement Division follow-up has resulted in larger administrative citations, continued enforcement, and onsite meetings with business owners. Currently, 21 open code enforcement violations or compliance reviews from industrial businesses are recorded with the City of Santa Ana, underscoring the need for close monitoring within the TZC area. The profile highlights the critical role of regulatory agencies in overseeing these businesses to mitigate potential environmental and public health risks. Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies Data from outside regulatory agencies assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. On April 25, 2024, City staff initiated public records requests from outside regulatory agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and others responsible for issuing specific types of permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Such agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities,         City Council 22 – 170 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 9 3 3 6 7 and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities for sites located within the TZC. The City has responses to its Public Records Act request from SCAQMD, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQB), and the Orange County Environmental Health Division Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Records show SCAQMD issued two notices to comply with one industrial business on August 2023 and April 2024 for failure to maintain records, such as temperature graphs, poundage logs, and source test data. SCAQMD issued several permits to construct and to operate to the new operator of this same facility, which is currently in compliance with SCAQMD. Two notices of violation to one industrial business for operating a paint spray booth without a valid permit to operate from SCAQMD. The report from the SARWQCB from 2023 shows five (5) active industrial businesses in the TZC that were in violation of their permit for providing a late report or incomplete and/or insufficient information for their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). Public records from the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for Orange County, spanning 2022-2024, reveal a pattern of non-compliance with environmental and hazardous materials regulations among industrial businesses within the TZC. While some 2023 violations related to Hazardous Material Business Plan staff training and reporting were later corrected, current records indicate four businesses still have multiple open violations. These ongoing issues include non-compliance with documentation for hazardous waste transportation and disposal, as well as deficiencies in industrial stormwater reporting requirements. Notably, records from 2022-2024 show repeated failures to submit required stormwater reports and deficiencies in hazardous waste management and emergency response planning, including missing documentation and training. These violations highlight potential risks to public health and the environment. The proposed amendments for the TZC aim to strengthen the City's land use regulatory oversight, providing a necessary tool to address these deficiencies and safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of the TZC community. Air emission complaints continue to be reported to SCAQMD. These complaints included one involving black smoke and another regarding unpermitted soil vapor extraction equipment onsite. SCAQMD staff has clarified that for air quality complaints they receive, their inspector is required to be physically present to observe the activity from the facility described in the complaint to determine if the complaint warrants further investigation or enforcement action in accordance with SCAQMD Rules 401 (Visible Emissions), 402 (Public Nuisance), and 403 (Fugitive Dust). Therefore, although community members continue to share concerns with City and SCAQMD staff, the turnaround time for an SCAQMD inspector to be physically present at an SCAQMD-permitted facility to investigate an air quality complaint, especially if a complaint is reported after working hours or on weekends, is ineffective in addressing the immediate needs of the community.         City Council 22 – 171 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 10 3 3 6 7 Public Outreach Following City Council's extension of the SD-84 TZC Moratorium on May 21, 2024, the Planning and Building Agency has been developing proposed regulations for the TZC district, encompassing the Downtown, Lacy, and Logan neighborhoods. This effort includes updates to permitted uses (including the removal of industrial uses), operational standards, non-conforming use regulations (including a new amortization process), and reflects ongoing input from affected business owners, residents, community stakeholders, and industrial/commercial brokers gathered since July 2024, including a Community Information Meeting on October 22, 2024, and culminating in a series of meetings through February 20, 2025. The draft amendments to the TZC were released to the public on January 15, 2025, and were made available on the City’s Moratorium webpage. These amendments address the permitted uses table, nonconforming regulations, amortization, and operational standards, and are designed to prepare for the TZC Moratorium's expiration on April 15, 2025. Staff met with business owners and brokers on January 30, 2025, to discuss the draft regulations and met with the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods meeting on February 19, 2025, and again with a focus group of industrial businesses on February 20, 2025. Staff have continued to update the TZC (SD-84) Moratorium project webpage with additional updates, including the Study Session and Public Hearing Notice and recent Planning Commission’s Study Session PowerPoint presentation. City staff have also prepared two Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents to clarify information regarding the Moratorium, affected businesses, the proposed zoning amendments, legal concerns, community engagement, and opportunities to participate in the public hearing process. The first FAQ became available prior to the City’s project informational meeting on October 22, 2024, and the second FAQ is included with this staff report (Exhibit 5). Current Code and Proposed Amendments to Text, Figures and Maps Based upon the City Council’s actions and direction enacting the moratorium combined with the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared the proposed zoning ordinance (ZOA No. 2024-02) and zoning map (AA No. 2024-03) amendments. The proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map.         City Council 22 – 172 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 11 3 3 6 7 Table 1: ZOA No. 2024-02 Current and Proposed Text Regulations Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Application of Article SAMC Section 41-2001 establishes the land uses and standards applicable to the TZC - primarily for new uses. The update to text of this Section clarifies that the regulations apply to existing uses, whether conforming or nonconforming, change in land use or tenancy requiring issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Organization SAMC Section 41-2001.5 establishes the contents and organization of the TZC regulations The update to the text is necessary to encompass the new Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses). Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses SAMC Section 41-2002 establishes the regulations for nonconforming buildings, structures or uses within the TZC boundary. The provisions contain minimal limits for rehabilitation of buildings and structures and their expansion for both residential and non- residential uses. The update to text of this Section will further limit some rehabilitation of buildings and structures, with specific emphasis on nonconforming industrial uses. These updated provisions include: •Requiring rehabilitation or expansion of buildings and structures, occupied by any nonconforming use to comply with the new operational standards contained in Section 41-2009. •Prohibits expansion of a building or structure occupied by a nonconforming industrial use. •Discontinuation of nonconforming noxious uses through amortization. •Elimination of certain nonconforming uses and structures •Establishes a process for enacting amortization periods for eliminating certain nonconforming uses. •References to SAMC and State law for abatement of public nuisances. •Establishes authority for voluntary compliance agreements between the City and nonconforming uses. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone SAMC Section 41-2004 establishes an overlay zone applied to M1 and M2 zoned properties located within the TZC boundary. Section 41-2004 is deleted in its entirety, removing the I-OZ Zone from the TZC to eliminate industrial land use type zoning altogether. Application for Discretionary Approvals SAMC Section 41-2005 establishes the process and timing of vesting for certain uses approved with a discretionary permit. Section 41-2005 is renumbered as 41- 2004, and the update to the text of this Section adds clarification for effects of the amendments to the TZC dependent upon status of an application in the City process of review, approval, and/or building permit issuance, if required.         City Council 22 – 173 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 12 3 3 6 7 Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Zones Established SAMC Section 41-2006 contains the regulations for zoning districts, land uses, and permit types within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section deletes the I-OZ Zone, including replacing Figure 2.1, the Regulating Plan (map) with a new Figure 2.1 removing the I-OZ Zone designation from all parcels within the TZC boundary. Uses Permitted SAMC Section 41-2007 provides the allowable land uses and permit types required to establish a land use by each zoning district within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section clarifies application of the use standards by zoning district as follows: •Modifies Table 2A containing the Use Standards by adding and reclassifying certain land use types appropriate to the TZC land use subcategories •Deletes certain land use types that are inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the TZC, including the deletion of the Small-Scale Industry land use subcategory in its entirety. Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-2008 primarily regulates new uses within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section further limits certain operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses SAMC Section 41-2009 is an entirely new set of regulations specific to existing nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC. The new Section establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. The regulations cover general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. Definitions SAMC Section 41-2080 contains the definitions applicable to terms and land uses of the TZC. The update to the text of this Section provides clarification for certain land use types (artisan/craft product with limited on-site production, commercial recreation facility – indoor, and research and development), adds definitions for land use types (automobile repair, automobile service, business support services, craft and specialized automotive restoration service, pet day care facility and trade school), and deletes corresponding definitions for land use types that were deleted as part of the amendments to SAMC Section 41- 2006.         City Council 22 – 174 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 13 3 3 6 7 Analysis of the Issues The proposed amendments to the Sections of the TZC under the topic headings of Application of Article, Organization, Application for Discretionary Approvals, and Definitions are largely to ensure internal consistency related to the more substantive changes being proposed for the TZC to address irreconcilable land use conflicts, described as follows: •Nonconforming Structures and Uses - Section 41-2002 regulates the nonconforming building, structure or use specifically within the TZC. The regulations are unique to the TZC and do not apply citywide. The regulations determine under certain circumstances when a nonconforming structure or use can rehabilitate both structural or nonstructural; or expand conditions that would allow expansion. Due to the concerns enumerated within this report related to nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC, the amendments to this section increasingly limit rehabilitation of structures to those types of improvements that address compliance with the new Section 41-2009 operational standards for nonconforming industrial uses; and disallow the expansion of any nonconforming industrial use. This Section also includes new provisions to establish a process for the discontinuance of nonconforming uses, specifically noxious uses, and the elimination of those uses or structures through an amortization hearing process. The tools that these new regulations provide are necessary to address the environmental impacts that lead to the adoption of the Moratorium, provide the framework to initiate the process to eliminate noxious industrial land uses from the TZC, and align with the adopted EJ policies of the General Plan. •The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone – Section 41-2004 created an “exception” zone for properties within the TZC that had already contained M1 or M2 industrial zoning, uses and structures, when the TZC was adopted in 2010. In order to be both consistent and to promulgate the new General Plan land use designations within the TZC, the removal of this overlay zone is necessary. The zone currently gives deference to the property owner of these parcels with an industrial overlay to decide when and whether to redevelop their properties in a manner that would remove the industrial structure and use, replacing it with an allowable use and conforming to the design standards of the TZC. Eliminating the I-OZ Zone will cause these properties to become nonconforming as to use and structure, subjecting them to the regulations as amended and added to Section 41-2002, including discontinuance of nonconforming use or structure though amortization. With the deletion of the entirety of the text of Section 41-2004, Section 41-2005 Application for Discretionary Approvals is renumbered as Section 41-2004. •Zones Established and Uses Permitted – Amendments to Sections 41-2006 and 41- 2007, respectively, include parallel deletion of the I-OZ Zone affecting the Regulating Plan (TZC zoning map) and the corresponding Use Standards tables regulating the land use and permit types for each of the remaining zones of the TZC. Table 2A categorizes land uses into broad subheadings for both residential and nonresidential land uses. The nonresidential land uses are further categorized into commercial-         City Council 22 – 175 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 14 3 3 6 7 oriented versus industrial-oriented types of uses. The amendments will eliminate the Small-Scale Industry sub-category altogether, since the majority of these uses are industrial uses incompatible with residential uses. The purpose of the TZC is to promote transit-oriented mixed-use development, which pairs residential and nonresidential land uses either horizontally or vertically on a site or within a building. Compatibility of allowable land use types is critical, particularly given the history of the negative impacts from industrial uses remaining in the area and in close proximity to existing and new residential areas. Amending this Section also replaces the TZC zoning map figure to ensure consistency with the City’s Official Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Map in accordance with requirements of State law, Government Code Section 65860. •Operational Standards and Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses – Section 41-2008 contains operational standards applicable to all uses within the TZC boundary. This Section is largely unchanged, with clarification and strengthening of certain regulations to address any possible industrial type function of an allowable land use type as listed in the tables of Section 41-2007. These amendments affected any possible manufacturing related activities, sound, screening walls and eliminated any vehicular service on Sundays. Section 41-2009 establishes new regulations governing existing industrial uses made nonconforming with the removal of the I-OZ Zone within the TZC, and include general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. The amendments to Section 41-2008 and creation of new regulations under Section 41-2009 ensure that existing nonconforming uses comply with very specific operational standards and/or face amortization that leads ultimately to discontinuance of use, effectively reestablishing the TZC area with residential uses and allowing certain nonresidential uses compatible to such residential and/or mixed-use development. Profile of Industrial Businesses Affected with Proposed Regulations The SD-84 Transit Zoning Code (TZC) area is characterized by a diverse mix of approximately 127 industrial businesses. These businesses range from automotive services (the most common industry type) and manufacturing to warehousing and recycling centers. Data compiled from city and external regulatory agencies, including CalEPA, SCAQMD, and CERS, reveal that these businesses operate under various permits related to hazardous materials, air quality, and water quality. Key business characteristics include the storage and use of hazardous materials such as motor oil, solvents, and various chemicals, as well as the operation of equipment like emergency generators and internal combustion engines. Notably, several businesses, particularly those engaged in manufacturing (spray booths, metal processing) and chemical storage, handle substances like xylene, resins, mineral oils, and acids, posing potential risks related to air and water contamination, as well as fire and health hazards. Heavier industrial operators, such as open air recycling and sorting facilities in the TZC have been creating a         City Council 22 – 176 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 15 3 3 6 7 range of issues in the neighborhood. Issues range from: 1) air pollution – dust and participate matter from the sorting process that can become airborne, leading to respiratory problems and reduced air quality, VOCs released from decomposing materials, and odors; 2) water pollution from stormwater runoff that can carry contaminants, including debris, chemicals, or bacteria, from a facility to nearby waterways; 3) noise pollution from heavy machinery, trucks, and sorting equipment generating noise; 4) visual blight from the constant movement of trucks and equipment and from the piles of trash, debris, and recycling materials that detract from the aesthetic appeal of the community. The secondary effects affect residents’ quality of life with increased traffic hazards and living next to these heavier industrial uses and the risks being exposed to these issues on a daily basis. General Plan Consistency The proposed zoning ordinance amendments are consistent with various goals and policies of the Santa Ana General Plan, as required by Government Code Section 65860, by timely addressing current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be inconsistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM- 3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: •Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life; •Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; •Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses; •Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; •Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC;         City Council 22 – 177 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 16 3 3 6 7 •Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit increased pollution new sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; •Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and •Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing.         City Council 22 – 178 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 17 3 3 6 7 Santa Ana’s current General Plan champions implementation policies, including 77 EJ actions that address air quality, noxious uses, water safety, residential lead exposure in the soil, and other environmental public health conditions. The proposed Transit Zoning Code amendments align with both the General Plan's EJ policies and the original land use designations applicable to the area since the adoption of the Transit Zoning Code in 2010. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies and local governments to measure the environmental impacts of development projects or other major land use decisions, and to limit or avoid those impacts if possible. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states the following with respect to an Addendum to an EIR: a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. Additionally, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, states the following with respect to a Subsequent EIRs: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or         City Council 22 – 179 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 18 3 3 6 7 (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A)The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B)Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C)Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D)Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03 are considered a project as defined by the CEQA. The City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that it is subject to CEQA guidelines and regulations (Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21000-21177). An Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearing House (SCH) No. 2006071100) has been prepared by the City. Based on its independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, and, in the exercising its independent judgement, hereby finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required for the proposed project; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR is required for the adoption of the Ordinances. Specifically, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City finds on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that: (1) no substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified as complete, that shows any of the following: (A) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (B) significant effect previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (C)         City Council 22 – 180 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 19 3 3 6 7 mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) mitigation measures or alternative which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Additionally, as detailed in the General Plan Consistency subsection of this report, the proposed Ordinances are consistent with numerous General Plan goals and policies that were evaluated as part of the General Plan Update Program EIR. The proposed Ordinances also satisfy and further implementation actions of the General Plan Update. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Resolution of the City Council and Addendum to the TZC EIR 2. Ordinance for Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 3. Ordinance for Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 4. Environmental Health Data and Reports 5. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 6. City Council Staff Report and Exhibits for the Adopted TZC Moratorium 7. Copy of Public Hearing Notice Submitted By: Margarita Macedonio, Principal Planner Approved By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Acting Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency         City Council 22 – 181 4/1/2025 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) WHEREAS , at a duly noticed public hearing held on June 7, 2010, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana (“City Council”) adopted findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and certified the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100, “Transit Zoning Code EIR”), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations, §§ 15000, et seq., “CEQA Guidelines”) and adopted the City of Santa Ana’s Transit Zoning Code (“Transit Zoning Code”), which is designed to provide the zoning necessary to support the long-term development of a successful transit program; and WHEREAS, after continued research and study, two ordinances have been developed that address the impacts from industrial land uses in the Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84) Zoning District, also known as the Transit Zoning Code: (1) Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 to amend certain provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and amend portions of the Transit Zoning Code, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amendment of non -conforming regulations; and (2) Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to remove the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an EIR has been certified, the lead agency is required to review any changed circumstances to determine whether any of the circumstances under Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162 require additional environmental review; and WHEREAS, the City has evaluated the proposed ordinances to the Transit Zoning Code in light of the standards for subsequent environmental review outlined in Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162, and concluded that the proposed changes would not result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects that were previously disclosed in the Transit Zoning Code EIR, and therefore no subsequent EIR or mitigated negative declaration is required; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes would nonetheless necessitate minor changes or additions to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and, thus, the City has prepared an Addendum for the Transit Zoning Code EIR (“Addendum”), attached as Exhibit 1, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15164 to address the proposed ordinances; and         City Council 22 – 182 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, the Addendum was prepared in full compliance with CEQA, CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subdivision (c) does not require the Addendum to be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to a final EIR or adopted negative declaration; and WHEREAS, under CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and as referenced below, the "project" shall mean the proposed ordinances under the Transit Zoning Code including implementation of these ordinances; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider these proposed ordinances, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and recommended approval of the ordinances to the City Council; WHEREAS, on March 18, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed publi c hearing to consider these proposed ordinances, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS the City Council considered the entire administrative record, including the staff report (and all attachments thereto), the Transit Zoning Code EIR and Addendum, and oral and written testimony from interested persons; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are true and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 requires lead agencies to prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions to the project are necessary, but none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR are present. The City Council has reviewed and considered the administrative record, including but not limited to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and the Addendum, which are all incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein, and finds that those documents taken together contain a complete and accurate reporting of all the environmental impacts associated with the Transit Zoning Code. The City Council further finds that the Addendum and the administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds and determines that the Addendum reflects the City’s independent judgment. The City Council finds that the foregoing is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Furthermore, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an EIR has been certified, the City is required to review any changed         City Council 22 – 183 4/1/2025 circumstances under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 to determine whether additional environmental review is required. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the administrative record, including but not limited to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and the Addendum, the City Council finds that none of the conditions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred because the proposed ordinances: a) do not constitute substantial changes that would require major revisions to the Transit Zoning Code EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; and b) do not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project was developed that would require major revisions of the Transit Zoning Code EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; and c) do not present new information of substantial importan ce that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Transit Zoning Code was certified, showing any of the following: (i) that the project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those previously analyzed woul d substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. Pursuant to CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, the City Council hereby adopts the foregoing findings and adopts the Addendum attached as Exhibit 1. City Council further directs City staff to cause a Notice of Determination to be filed and posted with the County of Orange Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse within five working days of the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. Section 4. The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Sant a Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The Planning and Building Agency is the custodian of records for the record of         City Council 22 – 184 4/1/2025 proceedings. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6. Section 5. This Resolu tion shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2025 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: ABSTENTIONS: Councilmembers: _______________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:________________________ Melissa Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2025-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on March 18, 2025. Date: ________________ ____________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana         City Council 22 – 185 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 1 ADDENDUM         City Council 22 – 186 4/1/2025 ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH NO. 2006071100 City of Santa Ana Amendment to Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development No. 84 Prepared For: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, California 92701 Prepared By: MIG, Inc. 1650 Spruce Street, Suite 106 Riverside, California 92507 January 2025         City Council 22 – 187 4/1/2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements ............................................................................. 1 1.3 Incorporation by Reference ............................................................................................. 2 SECTION 2.0 – BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 3.0 – DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT ..................................................... 6 SECTION 4.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING..…..…………………………….............................9 SECTION 5.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................... 12 5.1 Aesthetics/Visual Resources ......................................................................................... 13 5.2 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................... 16 5.3 Biological Resources ..................................................................................................... 22 5.4 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 24 5.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................................................................. 27 5.6 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................... 31 5.7 Land Use………. ........................................................................................................... 34 5.8 Noise ............................................................................................................................. 36 5.9 Population, Housing and Employment ........................................................................... 39 5.10 Public Services .............................................................................................................. 40 5.11 Transportation ............................................................................................................... 42 5.12 Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................ 46 5.13 Global Climate Change ................................................................................................. 48 5.14 Mandatory Findings of Significance ............................................................................... 51 5.20 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 52 FIGURES Figure 1: Transit Zoning Code Area ............................................................................................ 4 Figure 2: Transit Zoning Code Zoning Designations ................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Regional Location ...................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4: Citywide Aerial ........................................................................................................... 11 TABLES Table 1 - Current and Proposed Text Regulations ...................................................................... 6         City Council 22 – 188 4/1/2025 January 2025 1 Environmental Analysis 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Purpose On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (or “SD 84A and 84B”) through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD84 Zoning District. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Based upon the City Council’s actions and direction enacting the moratorium combined with the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03. The proposed amendments (“proposed amendments” or “project”) will modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process for industrial uses; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Refer to Section 3.2 – Project Description. Following preliminary review of proposed ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03 amendments, the City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that the project is subject to CEQA (Public Resources Code (PRC) §§21000-21177; 14 CCR §§15000, et seq.). This Addendum to Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and 84B) Environmental Impact Report (“TZC EIR”) (SCH No. 2006071100) has been prepared to demonstrate that, pursuant to the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, this project is within the scope of the TZC EIR. As a result, the City does not need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR as the TZC EIR fully analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed amendments. This is consistent with Section 8.06 of the City’s Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states the following with respect to an Addendum to an EIR: a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.         City Council 22 – 189 4/1/2025 January 2025 2 Environmental Analysis d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, states the following with respect to a Subsequent EIRs: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. 1.3 Incorporation by Reference The TZC Final EIR, including the original Draft EIR (DEIR), and has been made available for public review at the Lead Agency office (City of Santa Ana). The Final EIR is incorporated into this Addendum by reference.         City Council 22 – 190 4/1/2025 January 2025 3 Environmental Analysis This Addendum is available for public inspection at the City at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA, and on the City’s website at https://www.santa-ana.org/environmental-impact-report- transit-zoning-code/. 2.0 BACKGROUND The TZC was established in June 2010, which is located in the area west of Interstate 5, north of First Street, and between Grand Avenue and Flower Street, and south of Civic Center Drive in the City of Santa Ana. The TZC provided new zoning for all of the properties contained within its boundary. However, some properties with existing M1 and M2 zoning and/or existing industrial businesses also received an overlay district designation which allowed for the continuation of industrial land uses on those properties and allows for the option of future mixed-use development to be exercised at the discretion of the property owner. The purpose was to establish a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. On June 7, 2010, the City adopted the TZC and certified the TZC Final EIR (SCH No. 2006071100). The TZC Final EIR provides a program-level and project-level analysis of the environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the TZC. The majority of the analysis is done at the program level; however, a project-level analysis is provided for the development proposal to demolish 30,000 square feet of existing structures on eleven Redevelopment Agency-owned parcels and to construct 220 affordable residential units. The TZC Final EIR concluded full implementation of the TZC would result in significant and unavoidable impacts with respect to the following: aesthetics, air quality, cultural resources, noise, transportation, and climate change. The TZC Final EIR’s background and environmental impact conclusions are cited throughout this Addendum. In July 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2970, amending the Transit Zoning Code to modify certain design criteria regarding height, massing, open space location, driveway standards, lot dimensions, and parking alternatives, and determined that this ordinance was exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, section 15061(b)(3). This amendment did not include changes to land uses or permit types within the TZC. In support of the TZC amendment, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. Refer to Figure 1 – Existing Transit Zoning Code area and Figure 2 Transit Zoning Code Designations, below. However, due to the continued application of the industrial overlay zones within the TZC, implementation of the new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts with the new General Plan.         City Council 22 – 191 4/1/2025 January 2025 4 Environmental Analysis Figure 1 – Transit Zoning Code Area         City Council 22 – 192 4/1/2025 January 2025 5 Environmental Analysis Figure 2 – Existing Transit Zoning Code Designations         City Council 22 – 193 4/1/2025 January 2025 6 Environmental Analysis 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types, including the following: • Deletion of industrial land uses • Amend nonconforming regulations, including the addition of an amortization process • Amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses • Delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps • Delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map Implementation of the proposed amendments do not include nor require implementation of any site-specific development projects. Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations, below lists the proposed amendments and is followed by a summary of each. Figure 2.5 Proposed Transit Zoning Code Designations depicts the removal of I-OZ from the map. Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Application of Article SAMC Section 41-2001 establishes the land uses and standards applicable to the TZC - primarily for new uses. The update to text of this Section clarifies that the regulations apply to existing uses, whether conforming or nonconforming, change in land use or tenancy requiring issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Organization SAMC Section 41-2001.5 establishes the contents and organization of the TZC regulations The update to the text is necessary to encompass the new Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses). Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses SAMC Section 41-2002 establishes the regulations for nonconforming buildings, structures or uses within the TZC boundary. The provisions contain minimal limits for rehabilitation of buildings and structures and their expansion for both residential and non- residential uses. The update to text of this Section will further limit some rehabilitation of buildings and structures, with specific emphasis on nonconforming industrial uses. These updated provisions include: • Requiring rehabilitation or expansion of buildings and structures, occupied by any nonconforming use to comply with the new operational standards contained in Section 41-2009. • Prohibits expansion of a building or structure occupied by a nonconforming industrial use. • Discontinuation of nonconforming         City Council 22 – 194 4/1/2025 January 2025 7 Environmental Analysis Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations noxious uses through amortization. • Elimination of certain nonconforming uses and structures • Establishes a process for enacting amortization periods for eliminating certain nonconforming uses. • References to SAMC and State law for abatement of public nuisances. • Establishes authority for voluntary compliance agreements between the City and nonconforming uses. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone SAMC Section 41-2004 establishes an overlay zone applied to M1 and M2 zoned properties located within the TZC boundary. Section 41-2004 is deleted in its entirety, removing the I-OZ Zone from the TZC to eliminate industrial land use type zoning altogether. Application for Discretionary Approvals SAMC Section 41-2005 establishes the process and timing of vesting for certain uses approved with a discretionary permit. Section 41-2005 is renumbered as 41- 2004, and the update to the text of this Section adds clarification for effects of the amendments to the TZC dependent upon status of an application in the City process of review, approval, and/or building permit issuance, if required. Zones Established SAMC Section 41-2006 contains the regulations for zoning districts, land uses, and permit types within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section deletes the I-OZ Zone, including replacing Figure 2.1, the Regulating Plan (map) with a new Figure 2.1 removing the I-OZ Zone designation from all parcels within the TZC boundary. Uses Permitted SAMC Section 41-2007 provides the allowable land uses and permit types required to establish a land use by each zoning district within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section clarifies application of the use standards by zoning district as follows: • Modifies Table 2A containing the Use Standards by adding and reclassifying certain land use types appropriate to the TZC land use subcategories • Deletes certain land use types that are inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the TZC, including the deletion of the Small-Scale Industry land use subcategory in its entirety. Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-2008 primarily regulates new uses within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section further limits certain operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses SAMC Section 41-2009 is an entirely new set of regulations specific to existing nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC. The new Section establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. The regulations cover general standards, enclosed         City Council 22 – 195 4/1/2025 January 2025 8 Environmental Analysis Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. Definitions SAMC Section 41-2080 contains the definitions applicable to terms and land uses of the TZC. The update to the text of this Section provides clarification for certain land use types (artisan/craft product with limited on-site production, commercial recreation facility – indoor, and research and development), adds definitions for land use types (business support services, pet day care facility and trade school, nonconforming industrial, and noxious use), and deletes corresponding definitions for land use types that were deleted as part of the amendments to SAMC Section 41- 2006. Source: Planning Commission Staff Report         City Council 22 – 196 4/1/2025 January 2025 9 Environmental Analysis Figure 2.5 – Proposed Transit Zoning Code Designations         City Council 22 – 197 4/1/2025 January 2025 10 Environmental Analysis Analysis of the Amendments The proposed amendments to the Sections of the TZC under the topic headings of Application of Article, Organization, Application for Discretionary Approvals, and Definitions are largely to ensure internal consistency related to the more substantive changes being proposed for the TZC to address irreconcilable land use conflicts, described as follows: • Nonconforming Structures and Uses - Section 41-2002 regulates the nonconforming building, structure or use specifically within the TZC. The regulations are unique to the TZC and do not apply citywide. The regulations determine under certain circumstances when a nonconforming structure or use can rehabilitate both structural or nonstructural; or expand conditions that would allow expansion. Due to the concerns enumerated within this report related to nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC, the amendments to this section increasingly limit rehabilitation of structures to those types of improvements that address compliance with the new Section 41-2009 operational standards for nonconforming industrial uses; and disallow the expansion of any nonconforming industrial use. This Section also includes new provisions to establish a process for the discontinuance of nonconforming uses, specifically noxious uses, and the elimination of those uses or structures through an amortization hearing process. The tools that these new regulations provide are necessary to address the environmental impacts that lead to the adoption of the Moratorium, provide the framework to initiate the process to eliminate noxious industrial land uses from the TZC, and align with the adopted EJ policies of the General Plan. • The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone – Section 41-2004 created an “exception” zone for properties within the TZC that contained M1 or M2 industrial zoning, uses and structures, when the TZC was adopted in 2010. In order to be both consistent and to promulgate the General Plan land use designations within the TZC, the removal of this overlay zone is necessary. The zone currently gives deference to the property owner of these parcels with an industrial overlay to decide when and whether to redevelop their properties in a manner that would remove the industrial structure and use, replacing it with an allowable use and conforming to the design standards of the TZC. Eliminating the I-OZ Zone will cause these properties to become nonconforming as to use and structure, subjecting them to the regulations as amended and added to Section 41- 2002, including discontinuance of nonconforming use or structure though amortization. With the deletion of the entirety of the text of Section 41-2004, Section 41-2005 Application for Discretionary Approvals is renumbered as Section 41-2004. • Zones Established and Uses Permitted – Amendments to Sections 41-2006 and 41- 2007, respectively, include parallel deletion of the I-OZ Zone affecting the Regulating Plan (TZC zoning map) and the corresponding Use Standards tables regulating the land use and permit types for each of the remaining zones of the TZC. Table 2A categorizes land uses into broad subheadings for both residential and nonresidential land uses. The nonresidential land uses are further categorized into commercial-oriented versus industrial-oriented types of uses. The amendments will eliminate the Small-Scale Industry sub-category altogether, since the majority of these uses are industrial uses incompatible with residential uses. The purpose of the TZC is to promote transit-oriented mixed-use development, which pairs residential and nonresidential land uses either horizontally or vertically on a site or within a building. Compatibility of allowable land use types is critical, particularly given the history of the negative impacts from industrial uses remaining in the area and in close proximity to existing and new residential areas. Amending this Section also replaces the TZC zoning map figure to ensure consistency with the City’s Official Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Map in accordance with requirements of State law, Government Code Section 65860.         City Council 22 – 198 4/1/2025 January 2025 11 Environmental Analysis • Operational Standards and Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses – Section 41-2008 contains operational standards applicable to all uses within the TZC boundary. This Section is largely unchanged, with clarification and strengthening of certain regulations to address any possible industrial type function of an allowable land use type as listed in the tables of Section 41-2007. These amendments affected any possible manufacturing related activities, sound, screening walls and eliminated any vehicular service on Sundays. Section 41-2009 establishes new regulations governing existing industrial uses made nonconforming with the removal of the I-OZ Zone within the TZC, and include general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. The amendments to Section 41-2008 and creation of new regulations under Section 41-2009 ensure that existing nonconforming uses comply with very specific operational standards and/or face amortization that leads ultimately to discontinuance of use, effectively reestablishing the TZC area with residential uses and allowing certain nonresidential uses compatible to such residential and/or mixed-use development. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The City of Santa Ana is located in Orange County and serves as the County seat. The City is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the City of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of the City of Newport Beach (refer to Figure 3, Regional Location). As shown in Figure 4, Citywide Aerial, the City is bordered by the City of Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, the City of Tustin to the east, the cities of Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and the cities of Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. The TZC area is shown in blue on both Figure 3 and Figure 4, and a detailed view is shown on Figure 1 in Section 2.0.         City Council 22 – 199 4/1/2025 January 2025 12 Environmental Analysis Figure 3 – Regional Location         City Council 22 – 200 4/1/2025 January 2025 13 Environmental Analysis Figure 4 – Citywide Aerial         City Council 22 – 201 4/1/2025 January 2025 14 Environmental Analysis At the local level, the TZC area is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres, and is generally bounded by I-5 to the north and east, First Street to the south, and Flower Street to the west. Refer to Figure 1 in the Background section. The majority of the City is urbanized, with residential and nonresidential development, and mobility and public facilities all contributing to Santa Ana’s existing built environment. The City’s incorporated boundaries encompass approximately 27.4 square miles. Residential land uses occupy almost 40 percent of the land within the current City boundaries, accounting for 5,226 acres. Other predominant land uses include commercial (1,588 acres) and industrial (1,628 acres). While Santa Ana is a densely populated urban center with one of the most diverse international populations in Orange County, it can generally be characterized as a City of neighborhoods. Santa Ana has over 65 neighborhoods which are distinguished by their history, architecture, housing types, amenities, and unique character. The Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, also known as the TZC, is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres, and is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. The TZC area includes the Orange County Civic Center consisting of City, County and federal buildings, City, Downtown, the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and are established residential communities. Additional land uses include a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses. The TZC area overlaps portions of two of the City’s five focus areas, which are suited for new growth and development under the GPU: the Grand Avenue Avenue/17th Street Focus Area and the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The Grand Avenue Avenue/17th Street Focus Area is primarily business oriented with office and commercial storefronts and large apartment complexes. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area is characterized as a mix of residential, commercial and industrial. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Initial Study/Notice of Preparation of the DEIR (Appendix A) concluded certain topics to be “Effects Not Found to Be Significant” according to Section 15128 of the CEQA Guidelines as having less than significant or no impacts, and therefore were not included in the Final EIR. Agricultural Resources. The Initial Study concluded that the soils within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area are not candidates for listing as prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance. In addition, no farmland or agricultural activity exists on or in the vicinity of the Transit Zoning Code, and no portion is under a Williamson Act contract. The Initial Study concluded no that no impacts would occur. Geology and Soils. The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is located in an area of minimal geologic hazards. Any development within the project area would be designed in accordance with applicable building code requirements, which account for seismic groundshaking. The Initial Study concluded that no and less than significant impacts to would occur. Mineral Resources. The Initial Study determined that implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in the loss of availability of either a known mineral resource of value to the state or region, or a locally important mineral resource recovery site, because no such sites exist within the project area. The Initial Study concluded that implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in the loss of         City Council 22 – 202 4/1/2025 January 2025 15 Environmental Analysis availability of a locally important mineral resource delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Because the TZC Final EIR was certified in 2010, certain topics that were later added to the state CEQA Guidelines checklist were not included. The Tribal Cultural Resources topic was added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2017. Although added as a separate topic, the TZC DEIR Cultural Resources section did include an evaluation of Native American resources in Section 4.4.1 – Environmental Setting and Section 4.4.2 – Regulatory Framework. Impact 4.4-1 included MM 4.4-1(a) that required construction monitoring by a tribe. The TZC EIR included a Global Climate Change topic, which included greenhouse gas emissions. The Greenhouse Gas Emissions topic was added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2018. Greenhouse Gas Emissions was discussed in Section 4.13.2 – Existing Conditions, Section 4.13.2 – Regulatory Framework, and Section 4.13.4 – Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures. The Energy and Wildfire topics were added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2018. Although added as separate topics, Energy is discussed within Sections 4.12.12 and 4.12.13 of the Utilities and Service Systems topic of the TZC EIR. Wildfire (i.e. wildland fires), is discussed within Section 4.5.3 of the Hazards and Hazardous Materials topic of the TZC EIR. Although these topics were added following certification of the TZC Final EIR, they were discussed and analyzed in the respective sections identified above and do not represent new impacts not previously addressed. Sections 5.1 through 5.13, below, analyzes the potentially significant impacts that could occur as a result of implementing the proposed project through the adoption of the proposed text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations. Each topical section lists impact statements and mitigation measures from the TZC EIR, and provides an analysis and conclusion. Each TZC EIR conclusion includes a reference to the EIR impact statement (ex., Impact 4.1-3) and includes its associated significance finding. 5.1 AESTHETICS/VISUAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to aesthetics and visual resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? e. A project would be considered to create significant shade/shadow impacts if shade/shadow from the project results in a substantial loss of sunlight in a residential area or other sensitive receptor. Other sensitive receptors would include schools and parks.         City Council 22 – 203 4/1/2025 January 2025 16 Environmental Analysis TZC EIR Conclusions • Implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not substantially damage scenic resources within a State scenic highway, and no further analysis is necessary in this EIR. (DEIR Section 4.1.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would contribute to the image of, and add to the aesthetic quality of the City. As such, development under the proposed project would not degrade the existing visual quality of the area or obstruct key existing views and/or vistas in the vicinity. (Impact 4.1-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Future development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would improve the existing visual character. (Impact 4.1-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code, and associated infrastructure improvements would result in new sources of increased daytime glare. (Impact 4.1-3: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would result in new sources of spillover light. (Impact 4.1-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in a substantial increase in shade/shadows over sensitive uses. (Impact 4.1-5: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR FEIR Mitigation Measures MM4.1-1 Proposed new structures shall be designed to maximize the use of textured or other non-reflective exterior surfaces and non-reflective glass. Building materials shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of building permits for each project. (Impact 4.1-3) MM4.1-2 All exterior lighting and advertising (including signage) shall be directed onto the specific location intended for illumination (e.g., parking lots, driveways, and walkways) and shielded away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way to minimize light spillover onto adjacent areas. (Impact 4.1-4) MM4.1-3 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a specific development project, the applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the City for review and approval. The plan shall specify the lighting type and placement to ensure that the effects of security and other outdoor lighting are minimized on adjacent uses and do not create spillover effects. The plan shall specifically incorporate the following design features: o All projects shall incorporate project design features to shield light and/or glare from vehicles entering or exiting parking lots and structures that face sensitive uses (e.g., schools, hospitals, senior housing, or other residential properties) by providing barriers so that light from vehicle headlights would not illuminate off-site sensitive uses. o All projects shall incorporate project design features to provide landscaping, physical barriers, screening, or other buffers to minimize project-generated illumination from entering off-site areas and to prevent glare or interference with vehicular traffic, in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code. (Impact 4.1-4)         City Council 22 – 204 4/1/2025 January 2025 17 Environmental Analysis MM4.1-4 For any proposed structure that would exceed four stories in height, applicants shall submit a site-specific shade/shadow report with renderings representing the level of shade/shadows associated with the proposed development at the following times: 9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 3:00 P.M. PST for the both the winter and summer solstices. An additional rendering for the 5:00 P.M. PST time period shall be prepared for the summer solstice period. Typically, a variety of criteria are used to determine the significance of a shadow impact, including the following: o Affected land use (criticality of direct sunlight for the use). o Duration (hours per day in shadow); time of day (critical time period for direct sunlight). o Season (time of year use would be shadowed). o Extent (percentage of use that would be shadowed). o Preexisting condition (shadow condition due to existing buildings, landscaping, or other features). o Type (solid or dappled shadow). The report shall include any feasible design considerations that would reduce the extent of shadows cast by a proposed structure. The analysis and the project design plans shall be forwarded to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. (Impact 4.1-5) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that no impacts related to State Scenic Highways would result from implementation of the project because no scenic highways are located within the TZC area. Impacts related to visual and aesthetic quality (Impact 4.1-1) and visual character (Impact 4.1- 2) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to daytime glare (Impact 4.1-3) and spillover light (Impact 4.1-4) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Long-term development related shade and shadows (Impact 4.1-5) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make mitigation infeasible. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Implementation of the project through the proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations does not trigger new aesthetic and visual resources impacts requiring preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the project modifies the list of land uses and permit types (refer to Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations) including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the additional of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC area. Thus, there are no new land uses being introduced or different development standards that would have aesthetic or visual resource impacts. In particular, the proposed amendments will establish regulations for nonconforming uses, including light and glare. These regulations and standards will cover general standards, enclosed operations, light, glare, and outdoor storage and screening. No direct or indirect glare or heat, whether from floodlights or from high-temperature processes (including combustion or welding or otherwise) shall be visible or felt at the property line. Lighting must be shielded, boxed, or directed at a downward angle so as to minimize the generation of light and glare and to assure that there is no spillover of light and glare that will impact drivers or pedestrians on the public streets, on site activities, and adjoining or nearby properties. No activity shall be permitted which causes excessive light and glare to be transmitted or reflected to surrounding properties at a level resulting in detrimental impacts to adjacent properties. Light sources shall generally not be permitted in landscaped, buffer, or setback areas except for those illuminating         City Council 22 – 205 4/1/2025 January 2025 18 Environmental Analysis pedestrian walkways. Lighting used to illuminate parking areas shall be designed, located, and installed to be shielded and downlit and to reflect away from any nearby residential areas. Lighting for advertising signs shall not create glare or light which extends to surrounding properties. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures MM4.1-1 through MM4.1-4 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new aesthetics impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more significant impacts to aesthetics and visual resources. 5.2 AIR QUALITY This section analyzes the effects to air quality from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the proposed project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? TZC EIR Conclusions • The project would not create substantial objectionable odors. (Impact 4.2-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The project would not create short-term quantities of criteria pollutants above the significance thresholds published by SCAQMD. (Impact 4.2-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the project would increase local traffic volumes, but would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial localized carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations. (Impact 4.2-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The anticipated population increase of 12,225 new residents as a result of the long -term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code is consistent with the SCAG growth projections for Santa Ana and, therefore, would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Air Quality Management Plan. (Impact 4.2-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Construction activities associated with the construction of individual projects within the Transit Zoning Code area, including the Developer project, would contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation for criteria air pollutants. (Impact 4.2-5: Significant and Unavoidable with mitigation)         City Council 22 – 206 4/1/2025 January 2025 19 Environmental Analysis • Operation of the proposed project would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District standards for VOC, NOX, CO, and PM10 and would result in a projected air quality violation. (Impact 4.2-6: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) • Construction and operation of the proposed project would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the proposed project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. (Impact 4.2-7: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.2-1 Trash receptacles within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) will be required to have lids that enable convenient collection and loading and will be emptied on a regular basis, in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations for the collection of solid waste. (Impact 4.2-1) MM4.2-2 The construction contractor should ensure that no more than 5 acres per day are actively graded or developed. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-3 The construction contractor should ensure that all active disturbed surfaces should be watered three times per day throughout the construction period. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-4 The construction contractor should ensure that the mass grading, fine grading, and structure construction are conducted at separate time periods and do not overlap with one another. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-5 The construction contractor should ensure that all haul roads are watered three (3) times per day. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-6 The construction contractor should ensure that all traffic on unpaved roads is reduced to 15 mph or less. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-7 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that all diesel-powered equipment used will be retrofitted with after-treatment products (e.g., engine catalysts) to the extent that they are readily available in the South Coast Air Basin. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-8 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that all heavy-duty diesel- powered equipment operating and refueling at the project site use low-NOX diesel fuel to the extent that it is readily available and cost effective (up to 125 percent of the cost of California Air Resources Board diesel) in the South Coast Air Basin (this does not apply to diesel-powered trucks traveling to and from the project site). Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-9 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that alternative fuel construction equipment (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) be utilized to the extent that the equipment is readily available and cost effective in the South Coast Air Basin. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5)         City Council 22 – 207 4/1/2025 January 2025 20 Environmental Analysis MM4.2-10 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that construction equipment engines be maintained in good condition and in proper tune per manufacturer’s specification for the duration of construction. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-11 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure surrounding the construction site rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-12 As required by South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403—Fugitive Dust, all construction activities that are capable of generating fugitive dust are required to implement dust control measures during each phase of project development to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air. These measures include the following: o Application of soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas. o Quick replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas. o Watering of exposed surfaces three times daily. o Watering of all unpaved haul roads three times daily. o Covering all stock piles with tarp. o Reduction of vehicle speed on unpaved roads. o Post signs on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. o Sweep streets adjacent to the project site at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads. o Cover or have water applied to the exposed surface of all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. o Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads to wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-13 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes. Diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-14 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction parking be configured to minimize traffic interference during the construction period and, therefore, reduce idling of traffic. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-15 The developer shall require by contract specifications that temporary traffic controls are provided, such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-16 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system by scheduled to off-peak hours (9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.).         City Council 22 – 208 4/1/2025 January 2025 21 Environmental Analysis Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-17 Upon issuance of building or grading permits, whichever is issued earliest, notification shall be mailed to owners and occupants of all developed land uses within ¼ mile of any project within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) boundaries greater than four stories in height or 25,000 sf in area providing a schedule for major construction activities that will occur through the duration of the construction period. In addition, the notification will include the identification and contact number for a community liaison and designated construction manager that would be available on site to monitor construction activities. The construction manager shall be responsible for complying with all project requirements related to PM10 generation. The construction manager will be located at the on-site construction office during construction hours for the duration of all construction activities. Contract information for the community liaison and construction manager will be located at the construction office, City Hall, the police department, and a sign on site. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-18 The developer shall require by contract specifications that the architectural coating (paint and primer) products used would have a VOC rating of 125 grams per liter or less. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-19 The developer shall require by contract specifications that materials that do not require painting be used during construction to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-20 The developer shall require by contract specifications that pre-painted construction materials be used to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-21 As individual components of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) are implemented, an air quality impact analyses will be completed to determine their independent significance levels. Mitigation is to be incorporated at the individual component level to bring the individual components to less than significant on a site-by-site basis. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-22 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures exceeds current Title 24 requirements (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; The Energy Commission adopted the 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008, and the Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. The 2008 Residential Compliance Manual was adopted by the Commission on December 17, 2008, and the 2008 Non-residential Compliance Manual was adopted January 14, 2009.Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended November 1, 2005; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent, subject to review by the County Building Official. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning Department and Building Official for review and approval prior to issuance of the permit. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the County Building Official prior to certificate of occupancy. Any combination of the following design features may be used to fulfill this mitigation provided that the total increase in efficiency meets or exceeds 20 percent: o Increase in insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging is minimized         City Council 22 – 209 4/1/2025 January 2025 22 Environmental Analysis o Limit air leakage through the structure or within the heating and cooling distribution system to minimize energy consumption o Incorporate dual-paned or other energy efficient windows o Incorporate energy efficient space heating and cooling equipment o Incorporate energy efficient light fixtures o Incorporate energy efficient appliances o Incorporate energy efficient domestic hot water systems o Incorporate solar panels into the electrical system o Incorporate cool roofs/light-colored roofing o Or other measures that will increase the energy efficiency of building envelope in a manner that when combined with the other options listed above exceeds current Title 24 Standards (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended November 1, 2005; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-23 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a landscape plan for the Project that includes shade trees around main buildings, particularly along southern elevations where practical, and will not interfere with loading dock locations or other operational constraints. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-24 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed building or structure designs incorporate exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public areas. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-25 The applicant shall provide education and publicity about reducing waste and available recycling services to future tenants. The education and publicity materials shall be provided to the City for review and approval by the Planning Department. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-26 All showerheads, lavatory faucets, and sink faucets within the residential units shall comply with the California Energy Conservation flow rate standards. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-27 Low-flush toilets shall be installed within all commercial and residential (including Congregate Care) units as specified in California State Health and Safety Code Section 17921.3. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-28 All commercial/industrial/common area irrigation areas shall be capable of being operated by a computerized irrigation system which includes an onsite weather station/ET gage capable of reading current weather data and making automatic adjustments to independent run times for each irrigation valve based on changes in temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, rain, and wind. In addition, the computerized irrigation system shall be equipped with flow-sensing capabilities, thus automatically shutting down the irrigation system in the event of a mainline break or broken head. These features will assist in conserving water, eliminating the potential of slope failure due to mainline breaks, and eliminating over-watering and flooding due to pipe and/or head breaks. (Impact 4.2-6)         City Council 22 – 210 4/1/2025 January 2025 23 Environmental Analysis MM4.2-29 Landscape designers shall ensure that Project landscaping of commercial/industrial/common areas uses drought-tolerant and smog-tolerant trees, shrubs, and groundcover to ensure long-term viability and conserve water and energy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-30 Landscape designers shall ensure that the landscape plan includes drought resistant trees, shrubs, and groundcover within the parking lot and perimeter. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-31 Project designers shall ensure that design features incorporate light-colored roofing materials that will deflect heat away from the building and conserve energy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-32 The Project designers shall ensure that designs include all illumination elements to have controls to allow selective use as an energy conservation measure. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-33 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to promote ride sharing programs such as, but not necessarily including, publishing ride sharing information for all of the tenants, designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a website or message board for coordinating rides. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-34 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-35 Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that all interior building lighting supports the use of compact fluorescent light bulbs or equivalently efficient lighting to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-36 Tenants shall be responsible to ensure that preferential parking spaces are allocated to ultra-low emission vehicles and alternative fueled vehicles to encourage the use of alternative fuels and ultra-low emission vehicles. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-2 through MM4.2-29 would also apply to this impact. (Impact 4.2-7) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to increased local traffic volumes (Impact 5.2-3) and SCAG growth projections (Impact 4.2-4) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to objectionable odors (Impact 4.2-1), criteria pollutants (Impact 4.2- 2), contribute to an air quality violation (Impact 4.2-5) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to exceeding criteria pollutants during operations (Impact 4.2-6) and construction (Impact 4.2-7) were significant and unavoidable, and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts.         City Council 22 – 211 4/1/2025 January 2025 24 Environmental Analysis The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the project modifies the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the additional of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC area. Thus, there are no new land uses being introduced that would have air quality impacts. The proposed amendments will introduce new regulations for nonconforming industrial use that would discontinue nonconforming noxious uses, establish screening walls, eliminate vehicle servicing on Sundays. These regulations would reduce dust and lessen air quality emissions. No land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere. Uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emits dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. Sources of air emissions shall comply with all rules established by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40), the California Air Resources Board, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. These regulations will have a beneficial impact to air quality. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to air quality. Mitigation measures MM4.2-1 through MM4.2-36 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new air quality impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to air quality. 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to biological resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? TZC EIR Conclusions         City Council 22 – 212 4/1/2025 January 2025 25 Environmental Analysis • No endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species designated by the USFWS, CDFG, or CNPS are known to occur or expected to occur within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are located in these areas. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not in proximity to, nor does it contain, wetland habitat or a blueline stream. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) is surrounded by urban uses on all four sides, including two highways, and, therefore, does not function as a wildlife movement corridor. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Implementation of the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • No conflict with an adopted habitat conservation plan, Orange County NCCP/HCP or other local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan would occur, and there would be no impact. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not result in a potential reduction in nesting opportunities for resident and migratory avian species of special concern. (Impact 4.3-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.3-1 To ensure that avian species of concern, protected migratory species (e.g., MBTA), or raptors species are not injured or disturbed by construction in the vicinity of nesting habitat, the project applicant shall implement the following measures: 1. Tree removal shall be restricted to the period between August 30 and February 15, to the extent feasible, to avoid the breeding season of any migratory species that could be using the area, and to discourage nesting in the vicinity of an upcoming construction area. If it is not feasible to remove trees outside this window then, prior to the beginning of mass grading, including grading for major infrastructure improvements, during the period between February 15 and August 30, all trees within 250 feet of any grading or earthmoving activity shall be surveyed for active nests by a qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to disturbance. If active nests are found, and the site is within 250 feet of potential construction activity, a temporary fence shall be erected, where appropriate, around the tree(s) at a distance of up to 250 feet, depending on the species, from the edge of the canopy to prevent construction disturbance and intrusions on the nest area. The appropriate buffer shall be determined in consultation with the City of Santa Ana Park Naturalist or a designee. 2. No construction vehicles shall be permitted within restricted areas (i.e., protection zones), unless directly related to the management or protection of the legally protected species. 3. If a legally protected species nest is located in a tree designated for removal, the removal shall be deferred until after August 30, or until the adults and young of the year are no longer dependent on the nest site as determined by a qualified biologist. (Impact 4.3-1) Project Analysis and Conclusion         City Council 22 – 213 4/1/2025 January 2025 26 Environmental Analysis The City determined that impacts related to endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species or associated habitats or wildlife species, riparian habitat and sensitive natural communities, wetlands or blue line streams, wildlife movement corridors, habitat conservation plans, and biological resource policies would not have any impacts. Impacts to avian species were less than significant with implementation of the mitigation measures. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the TZC area is intended to be developed for urban uses and located in an area that is completely developed for urban uses. Because TZC area is a heavily disturbed and graded area consisting of industrial and residential uses, and the project does not introduce any new types of land use, and instead removes the industrial overlay zone, there will be no impacts to biological resources. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to biological resources. The project does not trigger new biological resource impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. Mitigation measure MM4.3-1 would continue to apply. There would be no new or more significant impacts to biological resources. 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? TZC EIR Conclusions • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource or disturb human remains. (Impact 4.4-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code has the potential to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature. (Impact 4.4-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The adoption of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Impact 4.4-3: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures         City Council 22 – 214 4/1/2025 January 2025 27 Environmental Analysis MM4.4-1(a) Prior to any earth-disturbing activities (e.g., excavation, trenching, grading) that could encounter undisturbed soils, the project applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to determine if the project could result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines or disturb human remains. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the archaeologist and the City of Santa Ana, an updated records search of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), updated Native American consultation, and a pedestrian survey of the area proposed for development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any archaeological resources within the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on archaeological resources or human remains. The measures shall include, as appropriate, subsurface testing of archaeological resources and/or construction monitoring by a qualified professional and, if necessary, appropriate Native American monitors identified by the applicable tribe (e.g., the Gabrieliño Tongva Nation) and/or the Native American Heritage Commission. The methods shall also include procedures for the unanticipated discovery of human remains, which shall be in accordance with Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City of Santa Ana for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on archaeological resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. Projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils and would therefore not be required to retain an archaeologist shall demonstrate non-disturbance to the City through the appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth-disturbing activities. Projects that would include any earth disturbance (disturbed or undisturbed soils) shall comply with MM4.4-2(b). (Impact 4.4-1) MM4.4-1(b) If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected historical resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity (“midden”), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) are discovered during any project-related earth- disturbing activities (including projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils), all earth- disturbing activity within 100 feet of the find shall be halted and the City of Santa Ana shall be notified. The project applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by the archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-L) form and filed with the SCCIC. (Impact 4.4-1) MM4.4-2(a) Prior to any earth-disturbing activities (e.g., excavation, trenching, grading) that could encounter undisturbed soils, the project applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist to determine if the project could directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the paleontologist and the City of Santa Ana, a paleontology records check and a pedestrian survey of the area proposed for development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies the paleontological sensitivity of the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on paleontological resources or unique geologic         City Council 22 – 215 4/1/2025 January 2025 28 Environmental Analysis features. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on paleontological resources or unique geologic features identified in the technical report or memorandum. Projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils and would therefore not be required to retain a paleontologist shall demonstrate non-disturbance to the City through the appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth-disturbing activities. Projects that would include any earth disturbance (disturbed or undisturbed soils) shall comply with MM4.4-3(b). (Impact 4.4-2) MM4.4-2(b) Should paleontological resources (i.e., fossil remains) be identified at a particular site during project construction, the construction foreman shall cease construction within 100 feet of the find until a qualified professional can provide an evaluation. Mitigation of resource impacts shall be implemented and funded by the project applicant and shall be conducted as follows: 1. Identify and evaluate paleontological resources by intense field survey where impacts are considered high 2. Assess effects on identified sites 3 Consult with the institutional/academic paleontologists conducting research investigations within the geological formations that are slated to be impacted 4. Obtain comments from the researchers 5. Comply with researchers’ recommendations to address any significant adverse effects where determined by the City to be feasible In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting paleontologist, the City of Santa Ana staff shall determine whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, project design, costs, applicable policies and land use assumptions, and other considerations. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources is carried out. (Impact 4.4- 2) MM4.4-3 Prior to development activities that would demolish or otherwise physically affect buildings or structures 50 years old or older or affect their historic setting, the project applicant shall retain a cultural resource professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History to determine if the project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the cultural resource professional and the City of Santa Ana, the appropriate archival research, including, if necessary, an updated records search of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and a pedestrian survey of the proposed development area to determine if any significant historic-period resources would be adversely affected by the proposed development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any historical resources within the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City Santa Ana for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical         City Council 22 – 216 4/1/2025 January 2025 29 Environmental Analysis resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. Such methods could include, but not be limited to, written and photographic recordation of the resource in accordance with the level of Historic American Building Survey (HABS) documentation that is appropriate to the significance (local, state, national) of the resource. (Impact 4.4-3) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to archaeological resources (Impact 4.4-1) unique paleontological resources (Impact 4.4-2), and disturbing human remains were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to historical resources (Impact 4.4-3) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. The TZC EIR states that there are 80 designated historic properties that are listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, five that are listed on the California Points of Historical Interest, and one that is listed on the California Historical Landmarks within and adjacent to the TZC area. The TZC area has already been subject to extensive disruption from previous development and may contain artificial fill materials. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required, nor would the project introduce new land uses that would have impact to cultural or tribal cultural resources that could otherwise make the long-term significant and unavoidable historical resource impacts more severe. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a), MM4.4- 1(b), MM4.4-2(a), MM4.2(b), and MM4.4-3 would continue to apply. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to cultural resources. Therefore, the project does not trigger new cultural or tribal cultural resource impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to cultural and tribal cultural resources. 5.5 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS This section analyzes the effects to hazards and hazardous materials from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?         City Council 22 – 217 4/1/2025 January 2025 30 Environmental Analysis c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? TZC EIR Conclusions • A private airstrip/heliport is not known to be located within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, nor is the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area located in close proximity to a private airstrip/heliport. (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is located in a dense urban environment and is surrounded by existing development. There are no wildland areas, nor wildland interface areas located in the vicinity. Consequently, no wildland fires would affect, or be affected by, implementation of the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B). (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could involve the transportation, use, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous materials, such as diesel exhaust. (Impact 4.5-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Construction activities associated with implementation of the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in the release of hazardous materials to the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions. (Impact 4.5-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Construction activities associated with the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would result in the handling of hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing school. (Impact 4.5-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) includes sites which are included on a list of hazardous materials sites and as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or environment. (Impact 4.5-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Construction activities associated with the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code could result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. (Impact 4.5-5: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The Transit Zoning Code could impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan resulting in a significant impact. (Impact 4.5-6: Less Than Significant with mitigation)         City Council 22 – 218 4/1/2025 January 2025 31 Environmental Analysis TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.5-1 When sites that are listed in the EDR Report initiate project development, the project applicant shall prepare a Phase I ESA for the proposed site. The Phase I ESA shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM E-1527-05 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process” (November 1, 2006). The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify environmental conditions at a proposed project site that may suggest environmental contamination. The Phase I ESA report shall be prepared by a CA EPA Registered Environmental Assessor or similarly qualified individual prior to initiating any construction activities at the site. If recommended in the Phase I ESA, the project sponsor shall undertake (or require the responsible party to undertake) a Phase II ESA soil sampling plan; or if any environmental contamination is identified by the Phase I ESA, the project sponsor shall implement (or require the responsible party to implement) the recommendations of the report to further investigate and to remove any soil contamination. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-2 In the event that previously unknown or unidentified soil and/or groundwater contamination that could present a threat to human health or the environment is encountered during construction in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the contamination shall cease immediately. If contamination is encountered, a Risk Management Plan shall be prepared and implemented that (1) identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk each contaminant would pose to human health and the environment during construction and post-development and (2) describes measures to be taken to protect workers, and the public from exposure to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation, long-term monitoring, post-development maintenance or access limitations, or some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of contamination, if any, appropriate agencies shall be notified (e.g., Santa Ana Fire Department). If needed, a Site Health and Safety Plan that meets Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements shall be prepared and in place prior to commencement of work in any contaminated area. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-3 Prior to the demolition of structures that were constructed before 1980, a thorough investigation shall be completed to determine if asbestos, lead, or PCBs exist on the site. All demolition that could result in the release of lead and/or asbestos must be conducted according to Cal/OSHA standards. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-4 For development of structures that exceed 200 feet in height above ground level at a development site, applicants shall file a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the FAA (FAA Form 7460-1). Following the FAA’s aeronautical evaluation of the project, projects must comply with conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the FAA. Subsequent to the FAA findings, the project shall be reviewed by the ALUC for consistency analysis. (Impact 4.5-5) MM4.5-5 Prior to initiation of construction activities, any development within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) Area shall have a completed traffic control plan, prepared by the project proponent that will be implemented during construction activities. This may include, but is not limited to, the maintenance of at least one unobstructed lane in both directions on surrounding roadways. At any time if only a single lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic signal, signal carriers (i.e., flagpersons), or other appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions. If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer shall provide appropriate signage indicating alternative routes. (Impact 4.5-6)         City Council 22 – 219 4/1/2025 January 2025 32 Environmental Analysis MM4.5-6 The City Public Works Department shall consult with the Santa Ana Police Department and the Santa Ana Fire Department to disclose temporary closures and alternative travel routes in order to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles when construction of future projects would result in temporary land or roadway closures. (Impact 4.5-6) MM4.5-7 The Santa Ana Fire Department, in consultation with other applicable City Departments (e.g., Police), shall update their Emergency Preparedness Plan prior to occupancy of the first project developed under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B), to address the potential for the accidental release of hazardous materials that may be used, stored, and/or transported in association with operation of project implementation. (Impact 4.5-6) MM4.5-8 Project applicants shall submit evacuation plans on a project by project basis that shall be reviewed and approved by the City Police and Fire Departments. (Impact 4.5-6) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to people residing or working in the vicinity of a private airstrip/heliport and wildland areas would have no impact (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact). Impacts related to transportation, storage and disposal of hazardous materials (Impact 4.5-1) and handling of hazardous materials near a school (Impact 4.5-3) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to reasonably upset of hazardous materials into the environment (Impact 4.5-2), hazardous materials sites (Impact 4.5-4), construction safety hazards for people or residing in the TZC area (Impact 4.5- 5) and interference with an adopted emergency response plan (Impact 4.5-6) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would require that no material or waste shall be deposited upon a subject parcel in such form or manner that it may be transferred off the parcel by natural causes or forces and that all materials or wastes which might cause fumes or dust, or which constitute a fire hazard, or which may be edible by or otherwise be attractive to rodents or insects shall be stored outdoors only in closed containers. Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in any manner so as to create any fire, explosive or other hazard. All activities involving the use or storage of combustible, explosive, caustic, or otherwise hazardous materials shall comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal safety standards and shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fire and explosion, and adequate firefighting and fire suppression equipment in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations. The burning of waste materials in open fires without written approval of the Fire Department is prohibited. No activities shall be permitted which emit dangerous radioactivity at any point nor shall electrical disturbances which adversely affect the operation of any equipment, other than that of the creator of such disturbances, be allowed. No use, activity or process shall cause electromagnetic interference with normal radio and television reception, or with the function of other electronic equipment beyond the property line of the site in which it is situated. All uses, activities and processes shall comply with applicable Federal Communications Commission regulations. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.5-1 through MM4.5-8 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new hazards and hazardous materials impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and         City Council 22 – 220 4/1/2025 January 2025 33 Environmental Analysis proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts to hazards and hazardous materials are not exacerbated. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to hazards and hazardous materials. 5.6 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section analyzes the effects to hydrology and water quality from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on or off site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? g. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? h. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? i. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? j. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? TZC EIR Conclusions • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map, and is not within the 100-year or 500- year flood hazard area. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not within the 100-year flood hazard area, (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located in the flood inundation area of the Prado Dam or the Santiago Dam. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not expose people to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow because the project site is not located near a coastal area, large water body, or         City Council 22 – 221 4/1/2025 January 2025 34 Environmental Analysis unstable and exposed hills or slopes. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would not violate water quality standards, waste discharge, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. (Impact 4.6-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The majority of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is already developed and because the project area is not used for groundwater recharge, the operation of future development under the proposed project would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. (Impact 4.6-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation with mitigation) • Development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could alter the existing drainage pattern of the area and potentially result in erosion and siltation. (Impact 4.6-3: Less Than Significant) • Future development in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could alter the existing drainage pattern and potentially result in increased downstream flooding through the addition of impervious surfaces, or exceeding the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. (Impact 4.6-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.6-1 In order to comply with the current version of the Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP), future development projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area shall prepare Storm Drain Plans, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) conforming to the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or Environmental Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Agency for review and approval. a. A SWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements of each phase of the development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the project is completed. The SWPPP shall include treatment and disposal of all dewatering operation flows, and for nuisance flows during construction. The SWPPP may include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following applicable measures: o Minimum required pavement widths for residential streets needed to comply with all zoning and applicable ordinances o Use permeable materials for private sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, or interior roadway surfaces o Reduce the overall imperviousness associated with parking lots by using pervious materials in spillover parking areas o Direct rooftop runoff to pervious areas and avoid routing rooftop runoff to the roadway or the stormwater conveyance system o Biofilters including vegetated swales and strips o Extended/dry detention basins o Infiltration basin o Infiltration trenches or vaults o Catch basin inserts         City Council 22 – 222 4/1/2025 January 2025 35 Environmental Analysis o Continuous flow deflection/separation systems o Storm drain inserts o Media filtration o Foundation planting o Catch basin screens o Normal flow storage/separation systems o Clarifiers o Filtration systems o Primary waste water treatment systems o Dry Wells o Cistern b. A WQMP shall be prepared, maintained, and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program. The plan shall incorporate water quality measures for all improved phases of the project. (Impact 4.6-1 and Impact 4.6-3) MM4.6-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits for future development projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, applicants shall submit site-specific Hydrology and Hydraulic Studies to the Public Works Department for review and approval. If existing facilities are not adequate to handle runoff that may be generated by the proposed development, then the applicant shall propose feasible remedies to assure that adequate drainage facilities will be available prior to issuance of occupancy permits. The applicant may propose storm drain improvements to be constructed in order to meet project needs. If necessary storm drain upgrades cannot be implemented prior to issuance of occupancy permits, on site detention facilities or other methods acceptable to the City shall be included with new development projects to ensure that post-construction runoff does not exceed pre-development quantities. (Impact 4.6-4) MM4.6-3 During the design of individual projects, applicants shall minimize impervious area by incorporating landscaped areas over substantial portions of a proposed project area. Furthermore, impervious areas shall be directly connected to landscaped areas or bioretention facilities to promote filtration and infiltration of stormwater. (Impact 4.6-4) MM4.6-4 During the design of individual projects, applicants shall control structural source through storm drain stenciling and signage, coverage of trash area to minimize direct precipitation, efficient irrigation to minimize runoff into stormwater conveyance system, slope and channel protection to decrease potentials for erosions of slopes, and use of deep-rooted, drought tolerant plant species for erosion control. (Impact 4.6-4) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to within a 100-year flood hazard area, flood inundation area, inundation from the Prado Dam, a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would have no impacts (DEIR Section 4.6-3). Impacts related to interference with groundwater recharge (Impact 4.5-1), alteration to existing drainage patterns (Impact 4.6-3) and increased downstream flooding (Impact 4.6-4) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of specific development projects, introduce new land uses nor increase the intensity the existing uses. The new regulations would require liquid or         City Council 22 – 223 4/1/2025 January 2025 36 Environmental Analysis solid wastes discharged from future development projects be properly treated and would therefore not pollute or contaminate any water courses or groundwater. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.6-1 through MM4.6-4 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new hydrology and water quality impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Therefore, there would be no new or more severe significant impacts to hydrology and water quality. 5.7 LAND USE This section analyzes the effects on land use from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Introduce new land uses that would result in conflicts of use? b. Physically divide an established community? c. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.? d. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? TZC EIR Conclusions • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located within either a natural community plan or applicable habitat conservation plan. The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area does not contain any critical or sensitive habitat. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in conflicts of use. (Impact 4.7-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not physically divide an established community. (Impact 4.7-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would conflict with the Santa Ana General Plan by adopting standards and land uses not currently allowed within the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area; however, as part of the proposed project, the General Plan would be amended to incorporate the proposed land uses and development standards. (Impact 4.7-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures All impacts were below the level of significance and mitigation measures are not necessary nor recommended.         City Council 22 – 224 4/1/2025 January 2025 37 Environmental Analysis Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to conflicts with a natural community plan or applicable habitat conservation plan would have no impacts (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact). Impacts related to incompatible land uses (Impact 4.7-1), potential to divide an established community (Impact 4.7-2), and conflicts with the Santa Ana General Plan (Impact 4.7-3) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. The proposed zoning ordinance amendments are consistent with various goals and policies of the Santa Ana General Plan, as required by Government Code Section 65860, by timely addressing current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing environmental justice and impacts were found to be less than significant. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be inconsistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC area. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: • Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles. • Resolving the conflict of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse. • Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses. • Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heave industrial facilities and emission sources. • Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC. • Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit high levels increased pollution near sensitive receptors within EJ (Environmental Justice) area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC. • Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors • Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area.         City Council 22 – 225 4/1/2025 January 2025 38 Environmental Analysis Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through discontinuing nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. Implementation of the proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations does not trigger new land use impacts that might otherwise occur with a development project requiring preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR. The new regulations would provide that any nonconforming business that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to, frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints, or is not in good standing with the City, including, but limited to constant service calls or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including business license revocation or terminating utility services or connections. For the purposes of this section, “frequent” is defined as more than one violation, call, or complaint per month during any twelve month period, and “constant service calls” is defined as more than one service call per month during any twelve (12) month period. Thus, the project would not physically divide an established community, or conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Therefore, the project does not trigger new land use impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to land use.         City Council 22 – 226 4/1/2025 January 2025 39 Environmental Analysis 5.8 NOISE This section analyzes the effects to noise from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. Cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d. Cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? TZC EIR Conclusions • The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport. (DEIR Section 4.8.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Construction activities associated with the proposed project would generate noise levels that exceed the noise standards established by the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. (Impact 4.8-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the proposed project could expose noise-sensitive land uses to noise levels that exceed the standards established by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Impact 4.8-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors on or off site to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, (Impact 4.8-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Occupants of the proposed residential units would not be exposed to potentially significant vibration levels. (Impact 4.8-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Physical impact from an increase in ambient noise levels could occur from the construction activities associated with the proposed project, an adverse effect on the nearby residents would not occur. (Impact 4.8-5: Less Than Significant) • No temporary or periodic noise impacts to on- or off-site receptors due to operation of the project. (Impact 4.8-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Operation of the proposed project would not generate increased local traffic volumes that would cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. (Impact 4.8-7: Less Than Significant without mitigation)Operation of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) rail line would potentially expose noise-sensitive land uses located within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area to noise levels that exceed the standards established by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Impact 4.8-8: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) • Construction activities associated with the proposed project would generate or expose persons or structures to excessive groundborne vibration. (Impact 4.8-9: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures         City Council 22 – 227 4/1/2025 January 2025 40 Environmental Analysis MM4.8-1 All construction activity within the City shall be conducted in accordance with Section 18-314(e) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-2 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that the following construction best management practices (BMPs) be implemented by contractors to reduce construction noise levels: Two weeks prior to the commencement of construction, notification must be provided to property owners within 300 feet of a project site disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffled according to industry standards and be in good working condition Place noise-generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses, where feasible Schedule high noise-producing activities between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. to minimize disruption on sensitive uses Implement noise attenuation measures, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible Construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent. If the City or the job superintendent receives a complaint, the superintendent shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action taken to the reporting party. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1) MM4.8-3 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that construction staging areas along with the operation of earthmoving equipment within the project area would be located as far away from vibration and noise sensitive sites as possible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-4 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away from residential streets. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-5 When residential uses would be located in areas with noise levels in excess of 60 dBA CNEL (either through conversion of use/structure or new construction), the project applicant shall provide noise barriers around private open space areas, including patios and balconies, as necessary. The height and density of the barriers shall be sufficient to reduce the exterior noise levels within private open space areas to a CNEL of 65 dBA or less. (Impact 4.8-2)         City Council 22 – 228 4/1/2025 January 2025 41 Environmental Analysis MM4.8-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, building plans shall specify the STC rating of windows and doors for all residential land uses. Window and door ratings shall be sufficient to reduce the interior noise level to a CNEL of 45 dBA or less, and shall be determined by a qualified acoustical consultant as part of the final engineering design of the project. (Impact 4.8- 2) MM4.8-7 Each project applicant shall provide proper shielding for all new HVAC systems used by the proposed residential and mixed use buildings to achieve an attenuation of 15 dBA at 50 feet from the equipment. (Impact 4.8-2) MM4.8-8 The City shall provide a written statement to each applicant for projects located within 400 feet of the SCRRA tracks that shall be provided for each residential unit and resident, notifying them of potential noise and vibration issues associated with the railroad tracks, including the following: Notice of Disclosure Each owner’s [or renter’s] interest is subject to the fact that trains operate at different times of the day and night on the railway tracks immediately adjacent to a project site; and that by accepting the conveyance of an interest [or lease agreement] in that project, owner [or renter] accepts all impacts generated by the trains. Posting of Notice of Disclosure in each residential unit. Prior to offering the first residential unit for purchase, lease, or rent, the property owner or developer shall post a copy of the Notice of Disclosure in every unit in a conspicuous location. Also, a copy of the Notice of Disclosure shall be included in all materials distributed for the Project, including but not limited to: the prospectus, informational literature, and residential lease and rental agreements. (Impact 4.8-8) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that no impacts related to the proximity public use airport would not result in impacts would result. Impacts related to exposure of sensitive receptors from excessive groundborne vibration (Impact 4.8-3), potentially significant vibration levels (Impact 4.8-4), ambient noise increase (Impact 4.8-5), periodic noise impacts (Impact 4.8-6), and noise from increased traffic volumes (Impact 4.8-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts from noise levels exceeding City noise standards (Impact 4.8-1) and exposure to noise-sensitive land uses (Impact 4.8-2) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts causing groundborne vibration and development exposure near the Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) rail line (Impact 4.8-8) and construction activities from project implementation (Impact 4.8-9) were found to be significant and unavoidable. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would limit daily operations times and days of week, and maximum noise that could be generated from existing uses. No industrial use shall generate ground vibration perceptible without instruments at any point along the property line of the site except for motor vehicle operations. No vibration shall be produced that is transmitted through the ground and is discernible without the aid of instruments by a reasonable person at the property lines of the site. Vibrations from temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that enter and leave the subject parcel are exempt from this standard.         City Council 22 – 229 4/1/2025 January 2025 42 Environmental Analysis Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.8-1 through MM4.8-8 would continue to apply. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. This will result in a beneficial impact. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and unavoidable noise impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.9 POPULATION, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT This section analyzes the effects to population, housing and employment from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? TZC EIR Conclusions • Implementation of the proposed project would accommodate projected population and housing growth. (Impact 4.9-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Construction of development projects pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could displace existing people or housing. However, this displacement would not necessitate the construction of additional replacement housing elsewhere. (Impact 4.9-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures All impacts were below the level of significance and mitigation measures are not necessary nor recommended. Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to accommodating population and housing growth Impact 4.9-1) and displacement of existing housing (Impact 4.9-2) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require development of housing units. The new regulations would provide architectural standards to any future development that would regulate the manner in which individual parcels and blocks are developed to create diverse and pedestrian-oriented development that would be consistent with the TZC area. In addition, there shall be no increase in the number of dwelling units unless the site on which the structure is         City Council 22 – 230 4/1/2025 January 2025 43 Environmental Analysis located complies with the off-street parking and open space requirements of the SAMC. Therefore, the existing less than significant population, housing and employment impacts would not result in new or different impacts nor would it increase unplanned growth and does not trigger new population and housing impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.10 PUBLIC SERVICES This section analyzes the effects to public services and recreational and park facilities from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection? b. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection? c. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? d. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for library services? e. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for park services? TZC EIR Conclusions • Construction of new projects pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would increase the demand for fire protection services, but it would not require the construction of new or physically altered facilities to accommodate the increased demand or maintain acceptable response times. (Impact 4.10-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the proposed project would increase the demand for police services, thereby requiring additional staffing, although it would not require the construction of new or physically altered facilities or personnel to accommodate the increased demand. (Impact 4.10-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Construction of new residential units within the project area would generate new students that could require the addition of new classroom facilities, thereby requiring         City Council 22 – 231 4/1/2025 January 2025 44 Environmental Analysis new or physically altered facilities to accommodate additional students in Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) schools. (Impact 4.10-3: Less Than Significant) • Construction of new residential units within the project area would generate new library users that could require the addition of new library facilities. (Impact 4.10-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • All properties identified as having new development potential to be built out pursuant to the provisions of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) these new projects would generate a need for new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. (Impact 4.10-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.10-1 Prior to an issuance of a building permit, individual projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area shall perform a water supply, fire flow test and fire protection system design analysis to ensure that proposed projects are in accordance to meet standard fire protection design requirements. (Impact 4.10-1) MM4.10-2 Any development that would exceed two stories in height shall submit site-specific security plans to the SAPD for review prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.10-2) MM4.10-3 No developer within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) boundaries shall utilize a frequency of 800 MHz, which is reserved for emergency services. (Impact 4.10-2) MM4.10-4 Individual project developers shall pay school impact fees prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. (Impact 4.10-3) MM4.10-5 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a residential development project, or change of use from non-residential to residential within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, project applicants shall pay to the City of Santa Ana the Park Acquisition and Development Fee. (Impact 4.10-5) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to the provision of library services (Impact 4.10-4) and recreation park facilities (Impact 4.10-5) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to fire services (Impact 4.10-1), Police services (Impact 4.10-2) and generation of new school children (Impact 4.10-3) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.10-1 through MM4.10-5 would continue to apply. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to public services. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and public services impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.11 TRANSPORTATION         City Council 22 – 232 4/1/2025 January 2025 45 Environmental Analysis This section analyzes the effects on transportation from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? f. Result in inadequate parking capacity g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) TZC EIR Conclusions • Operation of the proposed project would result in impacts related to neighborhood traffic in the adjacent residential areas to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.11-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would exceed standards established by the Orange County Transportation Authority within the study area. (Impact 4.11-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Development projects constructed pursuant to the standards contained within the Transit Zoning Code would not result in a change in air traffic patterns. (Impact 4.11-3: Less Than Significant) without mitigation • Development projects constructed pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not increase hazards due to a design future or incompatible uses. (Impact 4.11-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Development projects constructed pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could result in inadequate emergency access. (Impact 4.11-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development under the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would not result in inadequate parking capacity. (Impact 4.11-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The Transit Zoning Code would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. (Impact 4.11-7: Less Than Significant) • Long-term cumulative development under implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. (Impact 4.11-8: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development under implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would result in impacts related to freeway ramps in the vicinity of the Transit Zoning         City Council 22 – 233 4/1/2025 January 2025 46 Environmental Analysis Code area. (Impact 4.11-9: Less Than Significant with mitigation and Significant and Unavoidable due to a public agency (Caltrans) approval other than the City) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.11-1 The City of Santa Ana shall, during any roadway improvement within the Transit Zoning Code boundaries, evaluate, consider, and implement as appropriate the traffic calming measure(s), including but not limited to the following: o Curb extensions at local intersections o Short medians at entries to wide streets o Traffic circles at oversized intersections o Speed humps o Turn restrictions (Impact 4.11-1) MM4.11-2 As part of the project, the City of Santa Ana and the project sponsors shall work with the transit providers to implement various transit-related measures to improve and expand bus system service within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. These measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: o Adding bus stops to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area along existing roadways o Changing bus service headways to respond to increased demand o Changing bus service destinations to respond to changing demand o Adding local shuttle service for employees and patrons of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area o The details of bus service improvements shall be determined in coordination with OCTA. The following recommendations would help encourage public transit patronage for project-related trips: o Bus Stop Locations—Relocation of existing bus stops and the provision of additional bus stops should be considered to accommodate transit users at convenient locations. o Days of Operation—The City should work with OCTA to consider changes to route times to serve nighttime and weekend project visitors and employees. o Headway—The City should work w would be appropriate to reduce them Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. MM4.11-3 The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency shall monitor the traffic signals within the Transit Zoning Code study area once every five years to ensure that traffic signal timing is optimized. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-4 The City of Santa Ana shall institute a program for systematic mitigation of impacts as development proceeds within the Transit Zoning Code to ensure mitigation of the individual improvements. The program shall prescribe the method of participation in the mitigation program by individual projects and guide the timely implementation of the mitigation measures. The program shall include the following elements: A funding and improvement program should be established to identify financial resources adequate to construct all identified mitigation measures in a timely basis. All properties that redevelop within the Transit Zoning Code should participate in the program on a fair share per new development trip basis. The fair share should be based upon the total cost of all identified mitigation measures, divided by the peak hour trip generation increase forecast.         City Council 22 – 234 4/1/2025 January 2025 47 Environmental Analysis This rate per peak hour trip should be imposed upon the incremental traffic growth for any new development within the Transitioning Code. The program should raise funds from full development of the Transit Zoning Code to fund all identified mitigation measures. The program should monitor phasing development of the Transit Zoning Code and defer or eliminate improvements if the densities permitted in the Transit Zoning Code are not occurring. Program phasing should be monitored through preparation of specific project traffic impact studies for any project that is expected to include more than 100 dwelling units or 100,000 sf of non-residential development. Traffic impact studies should use traffic generation rates that are deemed to be most appropriate for the actual development proposed. Properties within Santa Ana and within one-half mile of the Transit Zoning Code that redevelop to result in higher traffic generation should also participate in the program to insure equity. The City may elect to implement appropriate mitigation measures as a condition of approval of the proposed developments, where appropriate. All or part of the costs of these improvements may be considered to be a negotiated credit toward the program, however the program must be administered in a manner that assures that it can fund necessary improvements to maintain adequate level of service at all intersections within this study. If funding of priority improvements cannot be assured, credit for construction of lower priority improvements may not be assured or may be postponed until more program funds are available. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-5 Main Street at First Street—Install a second northbound and southbound left-turn lanes and a dedicated northbound right-turn lane for 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-6 Lacy Street at Santa Ana Boulevard—Install a traffic signal and provide exclusive left-turn lane for both northbound and southbound directions for both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-7 Lacy Street at First Street—Install a traffic signal for both 2030 and 2035 conditions, a traffic signal, and provide exclusive left-turn lane for both northbound and southbound directions for both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-8 Santiago Street at Washington Avenue—Install a traffic signal and provide one exclusive left-turn lane for both eastbound and westbound traffic for 2035 conditions only. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-9 Santiago Street at Civic Center Drive—Install a traffic signal and provide: one exclusive left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through and right-turn lane on northbound and southbound approaches; and one exclusive left-turn lane and one shared through and right lane on eastbound and westbound approaches. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-10 Santiago Street at Santa Ana Drive—Construct a second southbound left-turn lane for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-11 Santiago Street a Fourth Street—Install a traffic signal. The lane configuration for the signal is recommended as 1 Left, 1 Through, 1 Through+ Right for all approaches. (Impact 4.11-8)         City Council 22 – 235 4/1/2025 January 2025 48 Environmental Analysis MM4.11-12 Standard Street at First Street—Construct third eastbound and westbound shared through-right lanes for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-13 Grand Avenue at Santa Ana Boulevard—Construct a third southbound through lane and eastbound right-turn overlap signal phasing. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-14 Grand Avenue at First Street—Construct a third eastbound shared through/right- turn lane, a third westbound shared through/right-turn lane, and a third northbound through lane with dedicated northbound right-turn lane for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-15 Grand Avenue at I-5 Northbound Ramps—Construct a second westbound right-turn lane and for the I-5 northbound off ramp under both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-16 I-5 at Santa Ana Blvd.—Northbound Off-Ramp—The City of Santa Ana Department of Public Works shall coordinate with Caltrans for the installation of a second ramp lane for the I-5 northbound off ramp. The improvement shall be implemented to mitigate 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-9) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to exceeding standards from the Orange County Transportation Authority (Impact 4.111-2), change in air traffic patterns (Impact 4.11-3), hazards due to a design future or incompatible uses (Impact 4.11-4), inadequate emergency access (Impact 4.11-5), inadequate parking capacity (Impact 4.11-6), and alternative transportation (Impact 4.11-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to neighborhood traffic (Impact 4.11-1) and traffic increases to the existing traffic load (Impact 4.11-8) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to development near freeway ramps (Impacts 4.11-9) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.11-1 through MM4.11-16 would continue to apply. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would provide recharging spaces for electric vehicles. Also, all truck parking areas must be on paved surfaces and the parking, loading or unloading of trucks associated with a business on public streets is prohibited. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. This will result in a beneficial impact to transportation. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and unavoidable transportation impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.12 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This section analyzes the effects to utilities and service systems from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project:         City Council 22 – 236 4/1/2025 January 2025 49 Environmental Analysis a. Require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? b. Require new or expanded water entitlements and resources if there are not sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources? TZC EIR Conclusions • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would generate an additional demand for water, but would not require water supplies in excess of existing entitlements and resources or result in the need for new or expanded entitlements. (Impact 4.12-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not require or result in the construction of new or expanded water treatment facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. (Impact 4.12-2: Less Than Significant)without mitigation • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Orange County Sanitation District. (Impact 4.12-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could require the construction of new or expanded wastewater conveyance systems, the construction of which would not cause significant environmental effects. (Impact 4.12-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not increase wastewater generation such that treatment facilities would be inadequate to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. (Impact 4.12-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not generate solid waste that exceeds the permitted capacity of landfills serving the area. (Impact 4.12-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development under the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. (Impact 4.12-7: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would increase the demand for electricity and gas, but would not require or result in the construction of new energy production or transmission facilities, the construction of which could cause a significant environmental impact. (Impact 4.12-8: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.12-1 Individual project applicants shall prepare site-specific sewer evaluations, including flow monitoring and modeling, during the project design to determine the adequacy of the existing sewer pipe capacity in the affected project area lines. The evaluation shall be submitted to the City of Santa Ana or OCSD, as appropriate, for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Any recommendations made in the site-specific sewer evaluations shall be incorporated into the design of each individual project. (Impact 4.12-4)         City Council 22 – 237 4/1/2025 January 2025 50 Environmental Analysis MM4.12-2 Individual non-residential project applicants are encouraged to apply for Southern California Edison’s “Savings By Design” program. The program is aimed at generating an overall reduction in energy use through design methods and incentive programs by maintaining a 15% or greater exceedance of Title 24. (Impact 4.12-8) MM4.12-3 Individual development projects within the boundaries of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) shall implement energy conservation measures (such as energy-efficient lighting and microprocessor controlled HVAC equipment) to reduce the demand for electricity and natural gas as part of the project design. The energy conservation measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed, or if current technology becomes obsolete, through replacement and shall be reviewed by the Planning and Building Agency prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.12-8) MM4.12-4 Individual development projects within the boundaries of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) shall implement energy conservation measures (such as energy-efficient lighting and microprocessor controlled HVAC equipment) to reduce the demand for electricity and natural gas as part of the project design. The energy conservation measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed, or if current technology becomes obsolete, through replacement and shall be reviewed by the Planning and Building Agency prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.12-8) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to additional water demand (Impact 4.12-1), expanded water treatment facilities (Impact 4.12-2), exceed wastewater treatment requirements (Impact 4.12-3), increase wastewater generation (Impact 4.12-5), generate solid waste exceeding permitted capacity (Impact 4.12-6), and compliance with applicable federal, state, and local solid waste regulations (Impact 4.12-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to new or expanded wastewater conveyance systems (Impact 4.12- 4) and an increased demand for electricity and gas (Impact 4.12-8) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.12-1 through MM4.12-4 would continue to apply. The new regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would provide any nonconforming business that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to, frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints, or is not in good standing with the City, including, but limited to constant service calls or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including business license revocation or terminating utility services or connections. Also, in addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated which will result in a beneficial impact to utilities and service systems. Therefore, the existing less than significant utilities and service systems impacts would not result in new or different impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.13 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE This section analyzes the effects to global climate change from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project:         City Council 22 – 238 4/1/2025 January 2025 51 Environmental Analysis a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas? TZC EIR Conclusions • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code at full build-out would result in significant localized air quality impacts for operational level emissions. As a whole, this impact is significant for operational emissions due to the size of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.13-1: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code at full build-out has the potential to conflict with AB 32. The Project as a whole is significant for operational emissions due to the size of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.13-2: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.13-1 All diesel fueled construction equipment shall be classified EPA Tier II or better emission efficiencies. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-2 All construction equipment shall be shut off when not in use and shall not idle for more than five minutes, unless actively engaged in construction activities. MM4.13-3 Queuing of trucks on- and offsite shall be limited to periods when absolutely necessitated by grading or construction activities. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-3 Queuing of trucks on- and offsite shall be limited to periods when absolutely necessitated by grading or construction activities. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-4 All on-road construction trucks and other vehicles greater than 10,000 pounds shall be shut off when not in use and shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-5 To the extent feasible, all diesel- and gasoline-powered construction equipment shall be replaced with equivalent electric equipment. MM4.13-6 Project plans and specifications shall include policies and procedures for the reuse and recycling of construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard). (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-7 Project plans and specifications shall include education for construction workers about reducing waste and using available recycling services. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-8 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures meets or exceeds the most recent Title 24 requirements (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards), subject to review by the City Building Official. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency and Building Official for review and approval prior to issuance of the permit. Installation of the identified design features or         City Council 22 – 239 4/1/2025 January 2025 52 Environmental Analysis equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to certificate of occupancy. The following design features should be considered by the applicant as a way to achieve Title 24 compliance in excess of the minimum requirement: o Increase in insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging is minimized o Limit air leakage through the structure or within the heating and cooling distribution system to minimize energy consumption o Incorporate dual-paned or other energy efficient windows o Incorporate energy efficient space heating and cooling equipment o Incorporate energy efficient light fixtures o Incorporate energy efficient appliances o Incorporate energy efficient domestic hot water systems o Incorporate solar panels into the electrical system o Incorporate cool roofs/light-colored roofing Or other measures that will increase the energy efficiency of building envelope in a manner that when combined with the other options listed above exceeds current Title 24 Standards (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended September 11, 2008; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-9 Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicants for individual projects shall provide a landscape plan that includes shade trees around main buildings, particularly along southern elevations where practical, and will not interfere with loading dock locations or other operational constraints. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-10 All showerheads, lavatory faucets, and sink faucets within the residential units, and where feasible within non-residential developments, shall comply with the California Energy Conservation flow rate standards. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-11 Low-flush toilets shall be installed within all Congregate Care units as specified in California State Health and Safety Code Section 17921.3. MM4.13-12 Project designers should consider design features to incorporate light-colored roofing materials that will deflect heat away from the building and conserve energy. (Impact 4.3- 1) MM4.13-13 Landscape designers shall ensure that landscaping of common areas for Industrial/Commercial projects uses drought-tolerant and smog-tolerant trees, shrubs, and groundcover to ensure long-term viability and conserve water and energy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-14 Landscape designers shall ensure that the landscape plan for Industrial/Commercial projects includes drought resistant trees, shrubs, and groundcover within the parking lot and perimeter. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-15 Individual project applicants shall ensure that designs for Industrial/Commercial projects include all illumination elements to have controls to allow selective use as an energy conservation measure. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-16 The applicant for Industrial/Commercial projects should promote ride sharing programs such as, but not necessarily including, publishing ride sharing information for all of         City Council 22 – 240 4/1/2025 January 2025 53 Environmental Analysis the tenants, designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a website or message board for coordinating rides. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience pursuant to SAMC Chapter 41 regarding bicycle parking standards and Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Citywide Design Guidelines regarding Bikeway Support Facilities Guidelines. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-17 Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that all Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects’ interior building lighting supports the use of compact fluorescent light bulbs or equivalently efficient lighting to the satisfaction of the Building Official. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-18 Applicants for Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects shall consider providing preferential parking spaces for ultra-low emission vehicles and alternative fueled vehicles to encourage the use of alternative fuels and ultra-low emission vehicles. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-19 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed Multi-family/ Industrial/Commercial uses building or structure designs incorporate exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public/common areas pursuant to the adopted standards. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-20 All common area irrigation areas for Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects shall consider systems that are capable of being operated by a computerized irrigation system which includes an onsite weather station/ET gage capable of reading current weather data and making automatic adjustments to independent run times for each irrigation valve based on changes in temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, rain, and wind. In addition, the computerized irrigation system shall also consider the ability to be equipped with flow-sensing capabilities, thus automatically shutting down the irrigation system in the event of a mainline break or broken head. These features will assist in conserving water, eliminating the potential of slope failure due to mainline breaks, and eliminating over-watering and flooding due to pipe and/or head breaks. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-21 Consideration of installation of solar roofs on homes and businesses to offset the increasing demand for energy and natural gas. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-22 Project applicants shall, where feasible, incorporate passive solar design features into the buildings, which may include roof overhangs or canopies that block summer shade, but that allow winter sun, from penetrating south facing windows. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-23 Use Energy Efficient Roofing Materials. All roofing materials used in commercial/retail buildings at the Mixed-Use Retail Development shall be Energy Star® certified. All roof products shall also be certified to meet American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) high emissivity requirements. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-24 All commercial/industrial projects shall, where feasible, include up to 10% renewable energy sources within the project. (Impact 4.3-1)         City Council 22 – 241 4/1/2025 January 2025 54 Environmental Analysis MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-24 would also apply to this impact. (Impact 4.3-2) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that long-term development related to localized air quality impacts from operational emissions (Impact 4.13-1) and operational emissions due to the size of the TZC area with the potential to conflict with AB 32 (Impact 4.13-2) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project Mitigation measures MM 4.13-1 through MM4.13.24 would continue to apply. The new regulations in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would provide that no land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere and that uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emits dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. This will result in a beneficial impact to climate change/greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the existing significant and unavoidable global climate change impacts would not result in new or different impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.14 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Would the project: a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? As detailed herein, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR is not appropriate for the project because none of the criteria permitting such a document under State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 are met. Project implementation does not include nor require implementation of specific development projects. The majority of the City is urbanized, with residential and nonresidential development, and mobility and public facilities all contributing to Santa Ana’s existing built environment. The proposed text amendments to SAMC Sections 41-2001, 41-2001.5, 41-2002, 41-2004, 41- 2005, 41-2006, 41-2008, 41-2009, and 41-2008 would merely update to clarify that the         City Council 22 – 242 4/1/2025 January 2025 55 Environmental Analysis regulations apply to existing uses, further limit some rehabilitation of existing buildings and structures, clarify the effects of amendments to the TZC, further limit certain existing operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses, and to establish regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial uses. Section 41-2001.5 is updated to encompass new SAMC Section 21-2009, which establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. Section 41-2004 deletes the Overlay I-OZ zone from the text and map. Implementation of these SAMC amendments would not require implementation of any specific developments or direct physical changes to the environment, and therefore would not be in conflict with the GPU and no intensification of land uses would result. The City of Santa Ana, which includes the TZC area, is not within a NCCP/HCP area, and therefore would not conflict with an adopted NCCP/HCP plan. No direct or indirect substantial adverse effects on human beings would occur. 5.15 CONCLUSION This project proposes amendments to the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) by way of ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03. These proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Refer to Section 3.0 – Description of the Proposed Project. This project would not result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in the TZC FEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts have been identified because the project basically limits industrial uses and would not lead to the expansion or intensification of new, expanded or more intensive uses. Therefore, there will be no new or more severe impacts as the result of the implementation of this project, beyond the impacts that have already been analyzed in the TZC FEIR. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decision-making body of the lead agency must consider the whole of the data presented in the TZC FEIR. As outlined in this Addendum analysis, all impacts of the project were fully examined in the TZC FEIR, and the proposed changes do not require substantial changes to the prior-certified EIR or previously adopted mitigation measures. Therefore, the preparation of an Addendum to the existing certified EIR is the appropriate CEQA document to support the City’s consideration of the project, as outlined in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164.         City Council 22 – 243 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 1 of 49 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024-02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has, by separate action taken on March 18, 2025, adopted an Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100), which was certified on June 7, 2010, by the City Council (“Addendum”). The Addendum analyzed the environmental impacts of the actions taken in this Ordinance. Adopting the Addendum satisfied the City Council’s obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) regarding amendments to the Transit Zoning Code and none of the conditions in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines 15162 apply. Thus, no further environmental review is required as adoption of this Ordinance falls within the scope of the adopted Addendum and previously certified EIR. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts the findings contained in the attached Exhibit “A” to this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. Section 41-2001 (Application of Article) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2001. Application of Article (a) The Transit Zoning Code, as authorized by Chapter 41, Article III, Division 26, Section 41-593 et seq., of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), is subject to the standards and regulations contained in this Article for the express purpose of establishing land use regulations and standards. All other applicable chapters, articles, and sections of the SAMC and any other regulations adopted by the City Council shall apply unless expressly stated or superseded by this Article. All terms contained herein shall be defined by the SAMC, unless specifically defined in this Article.         City Council 22 – 244 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 2 of 49 (b) Proposed development, including the construction, reconstruction or structural alteration of a structure, subdivisions, and new and existing land uses, whether conforming or nonconforming, as defined in Section 41-126 of the SAMC, within the specific development area shall comply with all the applicable regulations established by this Article article. (c) The regulations contained in this Article shall also apply to: 1. A change in land use within an existing building; and 2. A change in tenancy within an existing building requiring issuance of a new Certificate of Occupancy.” Section 4. Section 41-2001.5 (Organization) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2001.5 Organization (a) Regulating Plan and Zones Established: Sections 41-2006 through 2008 2009 of this Article defines the zones within the Specific Development (SD) boundaries of SD-84, the parcels included within each zone, and describes, zone by zone, the standards for building placement, design, and use consistent with the permitted uses identified in Table 2A. (b) Use Standards: Table 2A identifies the land use types allowed by the City in each of the zones established by the Regulating Plan. A parcel within the Specific Development (SD-84) boundaries shall be occupied only by land uses identified as allowed within the applicable zone and the type of City approval required by Table 2A. (c) Urban Standards by Zone: Sections 41-2010 through 2015 of this Article regulates the features of buildings that affect the public realm. The urban standards regulate building and parking placement, height, and profile, and vary according to the parcel's zone applied by the Regulating Plan. Standards for items not explicitly described in this section, including but not limited to, walls and fences, mechanical equipment, trash bin enclosures, heliport and helipad, underground utility, installation of dish antennas, loading areas, parking lot design standards, refer to other Sections of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code SAMC and the Citywide Design Guidelines. (d) Architectural Standards: Sections 41-2020 through 2039 regulates the manner in which individual parcels and blocks are developed to create diverse and pedestrian-oriented development, through the use of three main components: (1) Sections 41-2020 through 2032 building types (e.g., duplex, rowhouse, courtyard housing)         City Council 22 – 245 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 3 of 49 (2) Sections 41-2033 through 2039 frontage types (e.g., front yard/porch, stoop, arcade, shopfront) (3) Section 41-2040 (Table 4.3A) architectural styles (e.g., Main Street Commercial, Mission Revival, Art Deco, Folk Victorian, Craftsman, California Contemporary). (e) Sign Standards: Section 41-2050 regulates all signage within the SD boundaries to be consistent with the character described for each zone. (f) Subdivision Guidelines: Establishes guidelines for the creation and maintenance of a finely grained and walkable network of blocks punctuated by integral and varied open spaces. (g) Street Network Concepts: identifies conceptual location and guidelines for the street network. This section provides guidelines for the rights-of-way alignment, and width in plan and section with the corresponding details. (h) Definitions: Sections 41-2080 identifies and defines the terms used in this Code.” Section 5. Section 41-2002 (Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2002. Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses (a) A nonconforming building, structure or use shall comply with Article VI of this Chapter, except as provided below modified as follows: (1) A building or structure that does not conform to the architectural style or story height requirements at the time of the adoption of this Article shall not cause the structure to be non-conforming. (2) A nonconforming building, structure or use shall not be required to conform to current zoning regulations based solely upon a change in ownership of the property, except as otherwise provided in this Article. (3) A sale, lease or other transfer of a property containing a nonconforming building, structure or use does not trigger the loss of nonconforming status, except as otherwise provided in this Article. (24)Sections 41-681.1 through 41-681.4 and 41-683.6 of Article VI of this Chapter shall not apply to this buildings, structures and uses addressed within this Article or building, structures, and uses within SD-84, nor to existing accessory dwelling units (ADUs) permitted by the City of Santa Ana before the amendment to this Article.         City Council 22 – 246 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 4 of 49 (35)Rehabilitation, enlargement or exterior structural alterations of any nonconforming structure or structure occupied by a nonconforming use, except for structures occupied by single family and two-family dwellings, may be rehabilitated made as follows: a. Rehabilitation, limited to structural or non -structural alterations without any building expansion and without any intensification of a nonconforming use, is permitted if: 1. The operational standards contained in sections 41-2008 and 41-2009, as applicable, of this Article are met. 1. 2. All signage on the structure and the site on which it is located is brought into conformity with the signage requirements of this Chapter , as approved by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. 2. 3. All outdoor storage is screened by a solid screen wall not to exceed eight (8) feet in height. Outdoor storage shall not exceed the height of the screen wall. 3. 4. There shall be no increase in the number of dwelling units unless the site on which the structure is located complies with the off-street parking and open space requirements of this Chapter. 4. 5. Architectural massing, features and detailing shall be modified to bring the structure into closer compliance with the architectural standards of this Article code, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. b. Rehabilitation may include expansion of floor area without intensification of the nonconforming use when the total floor area of all expansions occurring in any five-year period does not exceed ten (10) percent of the floor area as it legally existed as permitted and constructed as of April 15, 2025 at the beginning of the five year period, provided that the following standards conditions are met: 1. The existing use is not a nonconforming industrial use. Nonconforming industrial uses may not be expanded. 2. The operational standards contained in Section 41-2008 are met. 1. 3. All signage on the structure and the site on which it is located shall be brought into conformity with the requirements of this chapter Chapter as approved by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee.         City Council 22 – 247 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 5 of 49 2. 4. There shall be no loading or unloading of vehicles between the hours of 10 pm and 7 am. 3. 5. All outdoor storage is screened by a solid screen wall not to exceed eight (8) feet in height. Outdoor storage shall not exceed the height of the screen wall. 4. 6. There shall be no enlargement which would intrude into any required setback area required by this Article. 5. 7. There shall be no enlargement which would result in a new nonconforming condition in violation of the requirements of this Chapter. 6. 8. Off-street parking shall be provided in conformance with the requirements of this Chapter. 7. 9. Landscaping shall be improved to bring the site on which the structure is located into closer compliance with the landscaping requirements of this Chapter, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. 8. 10. Architectural massing, features and detailing, shall be modified to bring the structure into closer compliance with the architectural standards of this Chapter, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. (46)Rehabilitation, enlargement or exterior structural alterations of buildings occupied by a single family and two-family dwellings is permitted subject to the following: a. Structural alterations and additions may be made where the total floor area of all such expansions occurring in a five-year period does not exceed forty (40) percent of the floor space of the building as it existed at the beginning of that five-year period, provided the number of dwelling units is not increased; and no new non-conformances with the requirements of this code Chapter are created. b. Structural alterations and additions which exceed forty (40) percent of the total floor area as it existed at the beginning of a five -year period; or remodeling which involves the demolition of more than fifty (50) percent of the building shall be permitted; provided that the following conditions are met: 1. Off-street parking shall be provided in conformance with the requirements of this Chapter. 2. No new nonconformities with the requirements of this Chapter are created.         City Council 22 – 248 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 6 of 49 3. A minimum of eight hundred (800) square feet of usable, continuous, non-front yard open-space, excluding driveways and parking areas is provided. Any open space with a minimum dimension of fifteen (15) feet by fifteen (15) feet shall be deemed continuous open space. c. Where rehabilitation of a building involves more than fifty (50) percent of a building wall which encroaches into a front or side yard setback and is demolished or is structurally altered, the remainder of the building wall shall be demolished. Any subsequent building wall shall conform to all provisions of this Chapter. d. An existing two-car garage with a minimum dimension of eighteen (18) feet by eighteen (18) feet exterior dimension shall be considered con - forming. e. Remodeling shall mean to reconstruct, or to make over in structure or style, but shall exclude re-roof, window replacement, exterior finish replacement and repair or similar modifications, as determined by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. f. No provision contained in this Article shall be interpreted or implemented in a manner inconsistent with State law addressing accessory dwelling units, as contained in Government Code Section 66310, et. seq., as amended from time to time. (5) Discontinuance of Nonconforming Uses, Generally. Nonconforming uses shall be discontinued pursuant to Sec. 41-683 (Discontinuance of nonconforming building or use) of this Chapter, regardless of intent, except as provided below: a. Discontinuance of Noxious Use. 1. If a nonconforming industrial use that meets the definition of a Noxious Uses as defined in this Article requires a new certificate of occupancy for any reason other than a change in business name with no change in owner of the business, legal nonconforming status shall be lost and any subsequent use must conform in every respect to the provisions of this Article. 2. If a nonconforming industrial use that meets the definition of a Noxious Use as defined in this Article is in violation of any applicable Federal, State, or local regulation, as provided below, legal nonconforming status shall be lost and any subsequent use of the building shall conform in every respect to the provisions of this Chapter: A. The violation lasts a period of thirty (30) consecutive days; or B. The violation(s) are observed and documented for a total period of sixty (60) days in a one-year period; or         City Council 22 – 249 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 7 of 49 C. Three noncompliant notices from a Federal, State, or local regulatory agency relating to or arising from the nonconforming use are sent in a one-year period. 3. For the purpose of this subsection 5(a)(2): A. The thirty (30) consecutive day time period shall be measured from the date of the first observed and documented violation. B. A one-year period shall be the twelve (12) consecutive months of time preceding the sixtieth (60th) day of total violations; or the twelve (12) consecutive months of time preceding the issuance of the third (3rd) noncompliant notice. C. Local regulations mean the SAMC, including, but not limited to, the operational standards contained in Section 41-2009 of this Article. D. A local regulatory agency includes the City, County of Orange, special districts, or any other local government agency charged with regulating noxious uses. E. Noncompliant notices may include, but are not limited to, Notice to Comply and Notice of Violation as issued by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQB). (6) Elimination of Nonconforming Uses and Structures. a. Elimination of Nonconforming Uses and Structures, Generally. 1. The City Council has determined that elimination of nonconforming uses and structures by amortization may be considered based upon one or more of the following factors: A. The threat to the public health, safety, and welfare posed by the continuance of the nonconforming use or structure; B. Adaptability of the land and improvements to a currently permitted use; C. Compatibility with the existing land use patterns and densities of the surrounding neighborhood;         City Council 22 – 250 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 8 of 49 D. Excessive calls for service to applicable response agencies related to the operation of the nonconforming use; and E. Failures to remedy notices of violation, administrative warnings, or other notices of noncompliance issued by a Federal, State, or local agency, including the City. 2. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, in conjunction with other City Departments and Agencies, may establish, and periodically update, a list or data resource that identifies categories of nonconforming uses or structures with specific metrics and operational characteristics, to develop a ranking system for use in the consideration of eliminating nonconforming uses or structures through amortization. 3. The determination of an appropriate amortization period for termination of a nonconforming use pursuant to this Article shall be made by a Hearing Officer retained by the City and who has professional legal and land use experience to address amortization. The Hearing Officer shall order nonconforming uses and structures to be discontinued and removed from their sites within a period determined pursuant to the process set forth in Subsection b (Establishment of Amortization Periods), and consider the following: A. If the nonconforming user has not made a substantial investment in furtherance of the use or structure, or if the investment can be substantially utilized or recovered through a currently permitted use, the order may require a nonconforming use or structure to be discontinued and removed from their site within a minimum of one year after the date of the order. B. If the nonconforming user has made a substantial investment in furtherance of the use or structure, or if the investment cannot be substantially utilized or recovered through a currently permitted use, the order may require the discontinuation and removal of the nonconforming use or structure within a longer reasonable amount of time. C. Nonconforming uses or structures that are determined to be an imminent threat to the public health or safety may be subject to immediate cessation and removal, pursuant to Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the SAMC. 4. Nonconforming uses and structures may also, upon order from the City or a court order, be subject to immediate cessation and removal of the nonconforming use or structure. b. Establishment of Amortization Periods. Where a period during which a nonconforming use or structure is to be discontinued and removed from a         City Council 22 – 251 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 9 of 49 site or sites is required pursuant to this Article, such period shall be established as follows: 1. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Ag ency, or designee, shall submit the nonconforming use or structure and a recommended amortization period, based on subsection 4. herein, to a Hearing Officer pursuant to Chapter 3 of the SAMC for review; 2. The Hearing Officer shall hold a noticed hearing to consider the recommended amortization period. Notice of the hearing shall be provided to the owner or operator of the nonconforming use or structure and the property owner at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Additional notice may also be provided to surrounding property owners and/or tenants, at the discretion of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. 3. The Hearing Officer shall consider the recommendations submitted by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, the General Plan of the City, and any testimony or evidence provided during the hearing, in order to determine the amortization schedule for elimination of the nonconforming use or structure. 4. The Hearing Officer shall establish a maximum amortization period during which the nonconforming use or structure shall be permitted to continue after considering the following in relation to the use or structure: A. The amount of investment or original cost of the use or structure; B. The present actual or depreciated value of the use or structure; C. The remaining useful life of the use or structure; D. The remaining term of the lease (if applicable); E. The date or dates of construction; F. Amortization of the business or structure for tax purposes; G. The salvage value; H. Adaptability of the land and improvements to a currently permitted use; I. Cost of moving and reestablishing the use elsewhere; J. Compatibility with the existing land use patterns and densities of the surrounding neighborhood;         City Council 22 – 252 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 10 of 49 K. The threat to the public health, safety, and welfare posed by the continuance of the nonconforming use or structure; L. Calls for service to applicable response agencies; M. Notices of violation, administrative warnings, or other notices of noncompliance arising from or related to the nonconforming use issued by a Federal, State, or local agency, including the City; and N. Other factors as appropriate. c. Hearing Officer Determination and Compliance. The determination of the Hearing Officer shall be made in writing and shall be final. 1. Notice of Amortization and Termination of Use. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall give notice by certified mail of the date upon which an amortization period will end to each owner of record whose property, or use of property, is not in conformance with the regulations of this Article, in those instances where an amortization period has been determined pursuant to this Article. Such notice shall be sent within ten (10) days of the termination of any appeal period. If the amortization period ends before or less than six (6) months after providing such notice, the notice shall be given that the amortization period in each instance shall be not less than six (6) months from the date the notice is sent. The notice shall set forth all pertinent provisions of this Article, including the declared purposes thereof and the approved amortization term. Failure to send notice by mail to any such owner where the address of such owner is not a matter of public record shall not invalidate any proceedings under this Article. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall be authorized record a Notice of Amortization Term & Termination of Use with the County Recorder, as provided for in California Government Code Section 27201(a). 2. Notice of Termination and Order to Comply and Conclusion of Amortization Period. Notice of Termination of a nonconforming use and order to comply shall be served by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, at the end of the amortization period upon the owner of record whose property contains such nonconforming use. In those instances, where the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, is unable with reasonable effort to serve such notice to the property owner, such notice and order shall be served within thirty (30) days of the end of the amortization period by delivering same to an occupant of the structure containing the nonconforming use.         City Council 22 – 253 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 11 of 49 3. Request for a Continuance of Nonconformities Beyond Period of Amortization Period. A request for a continuance of nonconformities beyond the period of amortization may be granted as follows: a. Grounds for Continuance. A nonconforming use or structure may be maintained for a reasonable time beyond its period of amortization as specified in this Article if the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, makes the following determinations: i. Special Circumstances. That special circumstances apply to any such use or structure that do not apply generally to others affected hereby; and ii. Compatibility with Public Welfare. That such a continuance for a prescribed period of additional time is in the public interest and will be reasonably compatible with, and not detrimental to, the use of adjacent properties. b. Application Process for Continuance. Any application for a continuance of a nonconforming use or structure must be filed with the Planning Division no later than thirty (30) days following the service of a Notice of Termination and Order to comply, or within thirty (30) days following the continued termination date. An application for a continuance may be filed by the owner of the property, a person with a power of attorney from the owner of the property, or a lessee, if the terms of the lease permit the existing use. Fees shall be required in accordance with this Code. c. Determination by Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. Upon filing of a complete application, the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall investigate the matter, give proper notice to the applicant, hold an administrative hearing and make a decision thereon based on the criteria set out in this Section and supported by written findings of fact within seventy-five (75) days from the date the application is filed, or within such extended period of time as may be mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, may impose such conditions, including additional time extensions not to exceed two (2) additional years, as may         City Council 22 – 254 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 12 of 49 be deemed necessary for the compatibility of such nonconformity with adjacent properties. d. Appeals. Appeals shall be filed in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 4. Failure to Comply with Hearing Officer’s Determination. Failure to comply with the Hearing Officer’s determination to discontinue a nonconforming use or structure shall constitute a violation of this Chapter and is subject to fines and enforcement provisions of Sec. 1-8 of the SAMC. 5. Failure to Terminate Use at Conclusion of Amortization Period. The failure to terminate a nonconforming use at the conclusion of an approved amortization period shall be deemed a public nuisance in accordance with California Government Code, Section 38771. The City is hereby authorized to abate the nuisance in accordance with Chapter 17 of this Code or may pursue any alternative remedy to abate the use authorized by this Code or State law. d. Additional Administrative Policies and Procedures. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, may enact and shall publish any additional administrative policies and procedures to effectuate the purposes of this Chapter, including, but not limited to, administrat ive policies and procedures to govern the selection of a neutral hearing officer and the conduct of hearings for the Establishment of Amortization Periods in order to implement the provisions of this Article. (7) Abatement. The provisions of this Section are in addition to authority existing under State law to declare and abate a public nuisance pursuant to California law and other applicable provisions of the SAMC. In the event that a legal nonconforming structure or use is found to constitute a public nuisan ce, appropriate and alternative action may be taken by the City pursuant to Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the SAMC and Article VIII (Enforcement) of this Chapter). (8) Exception. The provisions of this section shall not apply to multifamily dwellings damaged or destroyed by fire in accordance with Government Code Section 65852.2. (9) Voluntary Compliance Agreement. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, is hereby authorized to enter into a Voluntary Compliance Agreement with a business owner or property owner in order to establish terms for compliance with the provisions of this Article.” Section 6. Section 41-2004 (The Industrial Overlay I-OZ) Zone) of Chapter 41 of the SAMC is hereby amended to read as follows:         City Council 22 – 255 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 13 of 49 “Sec. 41-2004 Reserved. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone (a) The Industrial Overlay Zone (I-OZ) is applied to areas zoned M1 or M2 and occupied with an industrial use at the time of the adoption of this Article. The zoning for the individual parcels shall be determined by Sectional District Map number 7- 5-9 as it appeared on May 1, 2010. (b) The I-OZ allows the M1 and M2 regulations to apply to said parcel until such time as the property owner applies to modify the zoning district. The Regulating Plan identifies the boundaries of the applicable zoning district (i.e. Transit Village, Urban Center, Corridor, Urban Neighborhood 1 or Urban Neighborhood 2) within the Transit Zoning Code. (c) A property owner may apply to develop the parcel consistent with the applicable zoning district within the Transit Zoning Code. The applicant shall receive all the necessary site approvals including, the approval of the overlay zone site plan pursuant to Article III, Division 28 prior to development. (d) The uses in the I-OZ shall be subject to the regulations of the M1 and M2 zones (SAMC 41, Article III, Divisions 18 and 19), as applicable.” Section 7. Section 41-2005 (Application for Discretionary Approvals) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2005. Application for Discretionary Approvals (a) Site Plan Review shall mean specific development plan and shall comply with Sections 41-593.4 through 41-593.6. Sections 41-593.4 through 41-593.6 shall only apply to structures over four (4) stories in height. (b) Conditional use permits, variances and minor exceptions. Conditional use permits, variances and minor exceptions shall be subject to Article V of this Chapter, except for the permit thresholds for minor exceptions shall be as identified in Table 1B of this Article. (c) Effect of amendments to this Article on applications in progress shall apply as follows: (1) Discretionary Applications Submitted and Determined Complete. All discretionary permit applications that are active and that have been determined to be complete before the effective date of the Article or any amendment, shall be processed in compliance with the requirements in effect when the application was deemed complete, and pursuant to all requirements of Sections 41-2008 and 41-2009. (2) Approved Projects Not Yet Under Construction. Any structure authorized by a discretionary permit or approval of a land use as allowed by this Article for which a Building Permit application has been submitted or a Building Permit         City Council 22 – 256 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 14 of 49 has been issued may be constructed in compliance with the permit or approval, as long as construction is completed and the approved land use is established before the expiration of the permit or, where applicable, before the expiration of any approved time extension. (3) Project Under Construction. A project for which a Building Permit has been issued may be continued and completed in compliance with the plans and specifications upon which the permit was issued.” Section 8. Section 41-2006 (Zones Established) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended, including the replacement of Figure 2.1, to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2006. Zones Established (a) Purpose. This section establishes the zones app lied to property within the plan area by the Regulating Plan. The Regulating Plan divides the plan area into separate zones that are based on a transect of intensity within the plan area that ranges from the most urban types of development and land use to the least urban types, with most zones providing for a significant mixture of land uses within them. This approach differs from conventional zoning maps that typically divide cities into zones that rigidly segregate residential, commercial, industrial, an d institutional uses into separate areas, and thereby require residents to drive for nearly all daily activities. The use of zones based on development intensity (instead of land use zones) as the spatial basis for regulating development, directly reflects the functions of, and interrelationships between, each part of the plan area. The zones also effectively implement the City’s urban design objectives for each part of the plan area, to establish and maintain attractive distinctions between each zone. This is why some parcels are zoned with more than one zone. In such cases, the zoning is divided along a clear boundary such as the middle of a block. The zones of this Regulating Plan allocate architectural types, frontage types, and land uses within the plan area, as well as providing detailed standards for building placement, height and profile. The diagram to the right Figure 2.1 identifies the eight (8) 9 zones applied within the plan area as they relate to existing rights -of- way and parcels. (b) Zones established. The following zones are applicable to this specific plan, and applied to property within the boundary as shown on the Regulating Plan. (1) Transit Village (TV) Zone. The Transit Village zone is intended to provide standards for compact transit - supportive mixed-use/residential development. This zone is characterized by a wide range of building intensity, including mixed-use tower-on-podium buildings, flex blocks, liners, stacked flats, and courtyard housing. The zone accommodates retail, restaurant, entertainment, and other pedestrian-oriented uses at street level, with offices and flats above in the mixed -use building types, at high intensities and densities. The landscape palette is urban, with shading         City Council 22 – 257 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 15 of 49 and accent street trees in parkway strips along Santa Ana Boulevard, and in sidewalk tree wells where on-street parking is provided. Parking is accommodated on-street, in structures with liner buildings, and underground. (2) Government Center (GC) Zone. This area accommodates a wide variety of civic uses, including Federal, State, and local government offices and services, libraries, museums, community centers, and other civic assembly facilities and is identified, but not regulated, by this Article. Refer to City requirements as identified in SAMC Chapter 41. Building types vary according to their public purpose, are programmed by the various government agencies for their specific sites, and therefore are not coded by this Article the Transit Zoning Code (SD84A and SD84B). The landscape style is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells, and in landscaped public plazas. (3) Downtown (DT) Zone. This zone is applied to the historical shopping district of Santa Ana, a vital, pedestrian-oriented area that is defined by multi-story urban building types (flex blocks, live-work, stacked dwellings, and courtyard housing in the Downtown edges) accommodating a mixture of retail, office, light service, and residential uses. The standards of this zone are intended to reinforce the form and character represented by pre-World War II buildings and recognized as a National Historic District, through restoration, rehabilitation, and context- sensitive infill. The standards also facilitate the replacement or improvement of post-war development that eliminated the pedestrian orientation of various downtown blocks (for example, parking structures with no features of pedestrian interest along their entire lengths). The landscape st yle is urban, emphasizing shading and accent street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on-street and may also be in structures with liner buildings, underground, and within block centers in surface lots not visible from streets. (4) Urban Center (UC) Zone. This zone is applied to the area surrounding the Downtown, which serves as a transitional area to the surrounding lower intensity neighborhoods and to other areas where mixed-use and multi-unit residential buildings create a pedestrian- oriented urban fabric. The zone provides for a variety of non -residential uses and a mix of housing types at medium intensities and densities. Besides accommodating community serving businesses, this zone may also serve the daily convenience shopping and service needs of nearby residents. Building types include mixed-use Flex Blocks, stacked flats, live-work, row- houses, and courtyard housing. The landscape is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on -street and may also be in structures with liner buildings and underground in areas adjacent to the DT zone, and in surface lots away from street frontages. (5) Corridor (CDR) Zone. This zone is applied to properties fronting existing commercial corridors and provides standards to improve pedestrian-orientation in a transit-supportive, mixed-use area. Mixed-use flex block and live-work building types are at or         City Council 22 – 258 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 16 of 49 near the sidewalk, and accommodate street level retail, service, and office uses, with office and residential above. The landscape style is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on-street, and in screened surface lots between buildings, or away from streets, with no more than half the site frontage occupied by parking. (6) Urban Neighborhood 2 (UN-2) Zone. This zone is applied to primarily residential areas intended to accommodate a variety of housing types, with some opportunities for live -work, neighborhood- serving retail, and cafes. Appropriate building types include single dwellings, duplexes, triplexes and quadplexes, courtyard housing, rowhouses, and live - work. In some areas, the more intense, hybrid court building type is allowed where additional intensity is warranted while maintaining compatibility with neighboring properties (see Regulating Plan). The landscape is appropriate to a neighborhood, with shading street trees in parkway strips, and shallow- depth landscaped front yards separating buildings from sidewalks. Parking is on - street, and in garages located away from street frontages. (7) Urban Neighborhood 1 (UN-1) Zone. This zone is applied to existing primarily residential areas and is intended to strengthen and stabilize the low intensity nature of these neighborhoods. Appropriate building types include single dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes, and live-work. The landscape is appropriate to a neighborhood, with shading street trees in parkway strips and landscaped front yards separating buildings from sidewalks. Parking is on-street, and in garages located away from street frontages. (8) Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone. The I-OZ is applied to areas currently zoned M1 or M2, and occupied with an industrial use, to allow the types of land use activity and development permitted by existing M1 and M2 zoning to continue until such time that the owner chooses to apply the new zones identified in Figure 2.1. In order to determine if the M1 or M2 land use activity and development apply to a particular parcel, the I-OZ is further identified as I-OZ-M1 or I-OZ-M2. Until the property owner applies to modify the zoning district, property in the I-OZ shall be regulated by the provisions of the M1 and M2 zones (SAMC 41, Article III, Divisions 18 and 19), as applicable. (8) (9) Open Space (O) Zone. This zone identifies areas reserved for community parks and other open spaces and is identified, but not regulated, by this Article. Refer to City requirements as identified in SAMC Chapter 41. Allowable structures in this zone are limited to those necessary to support the specific purposes of the particular open space area (e.g., sport-court enclosures and multi-purpose buildings in active parks, and trails within passive parks).” Figure 2.1 Regulating Plan with Existing R.O.W.         City Council 22 – 259 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 17 of 49         City Council 22 – 260 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 18 of 49 Figure 2.1 Regulating Plan with Existing R.O.W. Section 9. Section 41-2007 (Uses Permitted) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2007. Uses Permitted. (a) Allowable Land Use Types. A parcel or building within the Specific Development SD-84 area shall be occupied by only the land uses allowed by the table entitled Use Standards (hereinafter Use Standards Table) within the zone applied to the site by the Regulating Plan. (b) No building shall be erected, constructed, reconstructed or structurally altered except in conformance with the provisions contained herein; nor shall any building or land be used for any purpose other than that which is permitted in the district or modified district in which such building or land is located. All u ses, as defined in this Article, not expressly permitted in any district enumerated in Table 2A, are prohibited. (b) (c) Garage sales are allowed in compliance with Section 41-193. (c) (d) Temporary outdoor activities are allowed in compliance with Section 41-195.5. (d) (e) Youth amusement rides are permitted in compliance with Section 41 -366 for C1 districts.         City Council 22 – 261 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 19 of 49 (e) (f) Drive-through facilities shall not be permitted. (g) The conversion of existing structures containing residential land uses to non - residential land uses is prohibited in the UN-1 and UN-2 zones. Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RESIDENTIAL Live-Work Use / Joint living-working quarters P (2) P (2) P (2) P (2) CUP CUP Care Homes CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Single Dwelling --- --- --- --- P P Multi-Family Dwellings P (1) P (1) P (1) P (1) P P Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RECREATION, EDUCATION AND ASSEMBLY Community assembly P (1) P (1) P (1) P CUP CUP Health/fitness facility P P P P CUP --- Library, museum P P P P P CUP Schools P (1) P (1) P (1) P CUP CUP Studio P P P P CUP CUP Trade School P (1) P (1) P (1) P (1) CUP --- Theater, cinema or performing arts P P P P CUP --- Commercial Recreation (Indoor) up to 5,000 square feet maximum floor area per tenant CUP P CUP P CUP P --- --- P --- Commercial Recreation (Indoor) > 5,000 square feet floor area per tenant CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RETAIL General retail, except with any of the following features P P P P P (2) --- • Floor area over 20,000 per tenant CUP CUP P --- CUP ---         City Council 22 – 262 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 20 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Artisan/craft product – limited on-site production CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Eating establishments P P P P P (2) --- Auto or motor vehicle service --- --- P P --- --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SERVICE GENERAL Banquet facility/catering-sub. to 41.199.1(a) through (d) CUP CUP CUP CUP (1) CUP --- Child day Day care center P (3) P (3) P P CUP CUP Adult day care center-subject to 41.199.2 of the SAMC P (3) P (3) P P P --- Hotel, excludes transient residential hotel and long-term stay P P P P --- --- Mortuaries, funeral homes --- --- CUP P --- --- Personal services P P P P P (2) P (2) Personal services - restricted --- --- CUP CUP CUP --- Pet day care facility CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP --- Tattoo/Body Art Establishments - subject to 41.199.3 of the SAMC P P P P --- --- Craft and specialized automotive restoration service --- P P P CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SERVICES-BUSINESS-FINANCIAL-PROFESSIONAL-TECHNOLOGY Bank, financial services P P P P --- --- Business support service P P P P P (2) P (2)         City Council 22 – 263 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 21 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Clinic, urgent care --- --- CUP P --- --- Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc., office P (1) P (1) P (1) P --- --- Extended Care P P P P CUP --- Laboratory – medical – analytical --- P (1) P (1) P --- CUP --- Media production – office or storefront type (no soundstage) P P P (1) --- P --- Professional / administrative/service office P (1) P (1) P (1) P P (2) P (2) Research and development P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SMALL SCALE INDUSTRY Artisan/craft product manufacturing CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Furniture and fixture manufacturing, cabinet shop P (3) --- P (3) --- --- --- Laboratory - medical - analytical --- P (1) P (1) P --- --- Manufacturing - light P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Media production - office or storefront type (no sound stage) P P P (1) --- --- --- Printing and publishing --- P (1) P --- --- --- Research and development P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION, INFRASTRUCTURE Helistops CUP CUP --- --- --- ---         City Council 22 – 264 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 22 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Parking facility - public or commercial, inclusive of ancillary recharging spaces for electric vehicles P P P P --- --- Transit station or terminal CUP --- --- CUP --- --- Public utility structure, excluding wireless communication facilities --- --- --- --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 MISCELLANEOUS Any structure over four (4) stories in height SPR SPR SPR SPR SPR --- Businesses operating between 12 and 7 am CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Alcoholic beverage sales or consumption CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP --- Expansion of existing, legally established self - storage facility --- --- --- --- CUP --- Drive-thru facility --- --- --- --- --- --- Section 10. Section 41-2008 (Operational Standards) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:         City Council 22 – 265 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 23 of 49 “Sec. 41-2008. Operational Standards (a) All property shall be maintained in a safe, sanitary and attractive condition including, but not limited to, structures, landscaping, parking areas, walkways, and trash enclosures. (b) All business activities shall be conducted and located within an enclosed building, except as allowed by Section 41-195 of the SAMC and except that the following business activities may be conducted outside of an enclosed building: (1) Newsstands (2) Flower Stands (c) There shall be no manufacturing, processing, compounding, assembling or treatment of any material or product., other than that which is clearly incidental to a particular retail and ser- vice general enterprise, and where such goods are sold on the premises. (d) There shall be no work inside of a structure that generates noise that exceeds 60 dB CNEL measured at the exterior wall of the individual tenant unit of a structure. (e) Storage of goods and supplies shall be limited to those sold at retail on the premises or utilized in the course of business. (f) Public utility structures, including electric distribution and transmission substations shall be screened by a solid wall at least eight (8) feet high, except as restricted by Sections 36-45, 36-46, and 36-47. (g) Any activity permitted shall be conducted in such a manner as not to have a detrimental effect on permitted adjacent uses by reason of refuse matter, noise, light, or vibration. (h) Small scale industry Artisan/craft product - limited on site production and research and development land uses shall require a solid wall or fence not less than eight (8) feet in height along any rear or side lot line. (i) All business activities, including, but not limited to, compounding, processing, packaging or assembly of articles of merchandise and treatment of products shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building. No ancillary vehicle maintenance or repair shall be allowed on site. (j) Loading areas shall not be visible from streets. Loading areas not facing a street shall be setback at least thirty-five (35) feet from the property line. (k) No business activity that generates noise or vibration shall be conducted between 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. Saturday and Sunday.         City Council 22 – 266 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 24 of 49 (l) Automobile servicing uses including nonconforming establishments, shall comply with the following operational standards: (1) No automobile servicing shall be conducted before 7:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and before 10:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. No servicing shall be conducted on Sundays. (2) All work shall be conducted inside an enclosed structure. (3) Outdoor or overnight vehicle storage is not permitted.” Section 11. Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby added in its entirety to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2009. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses. (a) In addition to the operational standards listed in Sec. 41 -2008, the following shall apply to nonconforming industrial uses: (1) The purpose of these operational standards is to protect and improve the living and working environment, the appearance of the community, reduce or eliminate nuisance conditions, and minimize the impacts of industrial uses on adjacent properties. (2) These standards are in addition to the operational standards established in Sec. 41-2008 and shall apply to all nonco nforming industrial uses, including those existing industrial uses that become nonconforming at the effective date of any implementing ordinance. (3) Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in a manner creating any dangerous, injurious, or noxious fire, explosive or other hazard that would adversely affect the surrounding area. (4) If any nonconforming use that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to: frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints relating to the nonconforming use; or is not in good standing with the City, including, but not limited to violations of Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code or public nuisances as defined and addressed by Chapter 17 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including initiating a hearing to consider business license revocation and/or terminating utility services or connections. For the purposes of this section, “frequent” is defined as more than one (1) violation, call, or complaint per month during any twelve (12) month period, and “constant service calls” is defined as more than one (1) service call per month relating to or arising from the nonconforming use during any twelve (12) month period         City Council 22 – 267 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 25 of 49 (b) Enclosed Operations. (1) All business activities, including, but not limited to, compounding, processing, packaging, or assembly of articles of merchandise and treatment of products shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building. (2) No automobile service or repair of any kind shall be allowed outdoors on site. (c) Air Emissions and Dust (1) No land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere. (2) Uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emit dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. Sources of air emissions shall comply with all rules established by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40), the California Air Resources Board, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. (d) Light, Glare, and Heat (1) No direct or indirect glare or heat, whether from floodlight s or from high- temperature processes (including combustion or welding or otherwise) shall be visible or felt at the property line. (2) To ensure that industrial development does not create light and glare nuisances, the following performance standards shall be observed: a. Lighting must be shielded, boxed, or directed at a downward angle so as to minimize the generation of light and glare and to ensure that there is no spillover of light and glare that will impact drivers or pedestrians on the public streets, on-site activities, and adjoining or nearby properties. b. No activity shall be permitted which causes excessive light and glare to be transmitted or reflected to surrounding properties at a level resulting in detrimental impacts to adjacent properties as dete rmined by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. (3) Light sources shall generally not be permitted in landscaped, buffer, or setback areas except for those illuminating pedestrian walkways. Lighting used to illuminate parking areas shall be designed, located, and installed to be shielded and down-lit and to reflect away from any nearby residential areas. Lighting for advertising signs shall not create glare or light which extends to surrounding properties. (4) No use shall be operated such that significant, direct glare, incidental to the operation of the use, is visible beyond the boundaries of the lot where the use is located.         City Council 22 – 268 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 26 of 49 (e) Ground Vibration (1) No use shall generate ground vibration perceptible without instruments at any point along the property line of the site except for motor vehicle operations. (2) No vibration shall be produced that is transmitted through the ground and is discernible without the aid of instruments by a reasonable person at the property lines of the site. Vibrations from temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that enter and leave the subject parcel are exempt from this standard. (f) Storage and Screening (1) No material or waste shall be deposited upon a subject parcel in such form or manner that it may be transferred off the parcel by natural causes or forces. (2) All materials or wastes which might cause fumes or dust, or which constitute a fire hazard, or which may be edible by or otherwise be attractive to rodents or insects shall be stored outdoors only in closed containers. (g) Hazardous Materials (1) Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in any manner so as to create any fire, explosive or other hazard. All activities involving the use or storage of combustible, explosive, caustic, or otherwise hazardous materials shall comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal safety standards and shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fire and explosion, and adequate firefighting and fire suppression equipme nt in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations. The burning of waste materials in open fires without written approval of the Fire Department is prohibited. (2) No activities shall be permitted which emit dangerous radioactivity at any point nor shall electrical disturbances which adversely affect the operation of any equipment, other than that of the creator of such disturbances, be allowed. (3) No use, activity or process shall cause electromagnetic interference with normal radio and television reception, or with the function of other electronic equipment beyond the property line of the site in which it is situated. All uses, activities and processes shall comply with applicable Federal Communications Commission regulations. (h) Liquid and Solid Waste (1) Liquid or solid wastes discharged from the premises shall be properly treated prior to discharge so as not to contaminate or pollute any watercourse or groundwater supply or interfere with bacterial processes in sewage treatment.         City Council 22 – 269 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 27 of 49 (2) The disposal or dumping of solid wastes, such as slag, paper and fiber wastes, or other industrial wastes, is prohibited. (3) Wastes shall be handled and stored so as to prevent nuisances, health, safety, and fire hazards, and to facilitate recycling subject to the review and oversight of the Fire Department. Closed containers shall be provided and used for the storage of any materials which by their nature are combustible, volatile, dust, or odor producing or edible or attractive to rodents, vermin, or insects. (i) Site Maintenance. All industrial land uses shall be maintained in compliance with Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and not constitute public nuisances as defined and addressed by Chapter 17 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code at all times and consistent with project conditions of approval (if applicable). (j) Truck Parking and Loading (1) All truck parking areas must be on paved surfaces. The parking, loading or unloading of trucks associated with a business on public streets is prohibited. (2) Trucks idling is prohibited. (3) All truck parking and loading areas shall be maintained in good condition as determined by the City. Annual inspections may be conducted by the City to ensure compliance. Any violation or failure to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter shall be deemed a nuisance. (k) Hours of Operation (1) For non-conforming industrial uses which are directly across a street from or abutting residential uses or structures, hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. (2) No operating hours are permitted on Sundays, or Federal Holidays.” Section 12. Section 41-2080 (Definitions) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2080 - Definitions The words and phrases, shall be construed as defined in this Article, unless from the context a different meaning is intended or unless a different meaning is specifically defined and more particularly directed to the use of such words or phrases. The words used in the present tense include the future tense, and words in the singular number include the plural number. If any of the definitions in this section conflict with definitio ns in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), these definitions shall control for the purposes of this Article. If any term herein is not defined by this subsection, the definitions contained within Division 2 (Definitions) of Article I of Chapter 41 of the SAMC shall apply.         City Council 22 – 270 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 28 of 49 1. Access (Direct): The physical pedestrian entrance to a unit that is provided directly from the street or courtyard. Also described as walk-up access. 2. Access (Point): The physical pedestrian entrance to a unit that is provided through a common space, such as a lobby or corridor that connects directly to the street or courtyard. Also described as non-walk-up access. 3. Accessory Structure: An accessory structure or building is a detached building or structure, or part of a building or structure, which is incidental or subordinate to the main building, structure or use on the same lot or parcel of land, without cooking facilities (e.g., storage shed, garage, gazebo), and is used exclusively by the occupant of the main building. 4. Alley: An alley is any public or private thoroughfare for the use of pedestrians or vehicles, not less than ten (10) feet nor more than thirty (30) feet in width, and is intended for service and only a secondary means of access to abu tting properties. 5. Arcade: see ‘Frontage Types’ 6. Artisan/craft product manufacturing - limited on-site production: The manufacturing of products primarily by hand by persons trained in an artistic skill, including ceramics, pottery, glass blowing, or sculptures. A specialized commercial facility with a retail-facing operation open to the public. Products are typically made by hand or with a restricted level of automation demonstrating an artistic skill. On -site production of artisan/craft product activities include design, production, processing, printing, assembly, treatment, testing, repair, and packaging, as well as any incidental storage. Typical artisan/craft products include, but are not limited to, electronics, food products, furniture-making, beverages, leather products, clocks and watches, jewelry, clothing/apparel, metal work, furniture and fine woodworking, glass, ceramics, paper and paper products, soaps, perfumes, and lotions, together with ancillary training and/or educational program activities. 7. Attic: The area found directly below the roof of a building and the ceiling of the top floor. The attic shall be an uninhabitable area. 8. Automobile repair: Automobile repair is the repair of motor vehicles, including the repair or replacement of engines and transmissions, body and fender repair, and the installation of non-factory installed products except those permissible through automobile servicing as defined herein. 9. Automobile service or Automobile servicing: Automobile service or automobile servicing is the servicing and minor repair of motor vehicles, including the replacement of belts, hoses, batteries, tires, shock absorbers, oil and air filters, chassis lubrication, air conditioning servicing, wheel alignments, replacement of brake pads, and engine tune-ups. 10. Bank, financial institution: An establishment for the custody, loan, exchange or issue of money, for the extension of credit, and for facilitating the transmission of         City Council 22 – 271 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 29 of 49 funds. Excludes check cashers as defined by California Civil Code secti on 1789.31. 11. Basement: That portion of a building between floor and ceiling which is either totally or partly below grade and in compliance with the definition of basement established in the California Building Code (CBC). 12. Block: An area of land within a subdivision which area is entirely bounded by streets, highways or ways, excepts alley and the exterior boundary of the subdivision. 13. Building Height: The vertical extent of a building measured in stories to the eave of the highest story, not including a basement or an attic. Height limits do not apply to masts, belfries, clock towers, steeples, equipment screening, chimney flues, and similar structures. Building height shall be measured from the average grade of the fronting thoroughfare curb level. 14. Building Placement: The maximum horizontal envelope available for placing a building on a lot. 15. Building Type: A structure defined by the combination of configuration and placement. The building types used in this Article are listed below: a. Bungalow Court: A configuration of freestanding single units arranged around a common, shared courtyard that is wholly open to the street. The individual buildings are arranged next to each other to form the bungalow court building type. b. Courtyard Housing: A building type consisting of residences that can be arranged in four possible configurations: townhouses, townhouses over flats, flats, and flats over flats. The structures are arranged next to each other, on one or more courts that are partly or wholly open to the street. c. Duplex, Triplex, and Quadplex: Multiple dwelling forms that are architecturally presented as large single-family houses in their typical neighborhood setting. d. Flex Block: A building generally of a single massing e lement, designed for occupancy by retail, service, or office uses on the ground floor, with upper floors also configured for those uses or for residences. e. House: A structure occupied by a single household that also accommodates commercial and office uses as allowed. f. Hybrid Court: A building that combines the point-access portion of the stacked dwelling building type (double-loaded corridor element) with the walk-up portion of the courtyard housing building type.         City Council 22 – 272 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 30 of 49 g. Lined Block: A building that conceals a public garage or other faceless building that is designed for occupancy by retail, service, or office uses on the ground floor, with upper floors also configured for those uses or for residences. h. Live/Work: An integrated residence and working space, occupie d and utilized by a single household in an arrangement of at least 3 such structures or 1 multiple structure with a least 3 units arranged side by side along the primary frontage, that has been designed or structurally modified to accommodate joint residential occupancy and work activity. i. Rowhouse: An individual structure on a parcel with a private rear yard and individual garage accessed from an alley. Such structure shall be developed in an arrangement of at least 3 such structures along the primary fron tage. Or, a structure of at least 3 attached townhouse unit types arranged side by side with a private rear yard and individual garage accessed from an alley along the primary frontage. j. Stacked Dwellings: A building of single-floor or multi-floor residences of similar configuration either above or below that are stacked. k. Tower-on-Podium: A multi-level building organized around a central core with the first two to five floors expressed as a podium building. l. Tuck-Under Housing: An individual structure on a parcel with no rear yard, where its garage is tucked under the rear of the house and accessed from an alley. Such structure shall be developed with at least four such individual structures, or a structure of at least four attached townhouse units types arranged side by side along the primary frontage. 16. Bungalow Court: See 'Building Types' 17. Business support service. Commercial establishment that provides services to other businesses including maintenance, repair and service, testing, rental, etc. including the following examples: a. Computer-related services (rental/repair) b. Copying and quick printing services c. Film processing and photofinishing (retail) d. Graphic design services e. Mailing and mail box services f. Security systems services 18. Clinic, Urgent Care: A facility other than a hospital where medical, mental health, surgical or other personal health services are provided on an outpatient basis, including incidental medical laboratories. Examples of these uses include: a. mMedical offices with five or more licensed practitioners or medical specialties         City Council 22 – 273 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 31 of 49 b. oOut-patient care facilities, urgent care facilities. c. Counseling services by other than medical doctors or psychiatrists are included under "Offices - Professional/Administrative." 19. Community Assembly: Group gatherings conducted indoors such as synagogues, mosques, temples, churches, community centers, bingo halls, private clubs, fraternal, philanthropic and charitable organizations and lodges. 20. Commercial Recreation Facility - Indoor: Establishments providing indoor amusement and entertainment services for a fee or admission charge, including: a. Bowling alleys, Tossing or Throwing Games, Indoor Sports b. Coin-operated amusement arcades c. Electronic game arcades (video games, etc.) Pool, billiards d. Skating sports (ice, roller, board), Escape Room, Mystery Games This use does not include adult businesses. Four or more electronic games or coin - operated amusements in any establishment, or a premises where 50 percent or more of the floor area is occupied by amusement devices, are considered an electronic game arcade as described above; three or fewer machines are not considered a land use separate from the primary use of the site. Ancillary uses include meeting rooms, snack bars, and equipment rental or sales are permitted within an indoor recreation facility, provided that their gross floor area of the ancillary use does not exceed twenty percent (20%). Ancillary uses shall operate in conjunction with the primary recreation use, and shall maintain the same or fewer hours of operation. 21. Commercial Frontage: The non-residential frontage of a building. Non-residential activities subject to city approval are allowed within this space, which must be at least 25 feet in depth. These spaces are limited to the first floor and as such, have different building requirements than upper floors (e.g., large storefront windows, signage, etc.). 22. Courtyard Housing: See 'Building Types' 23. Craft and specialized automotive restoration service: A specialized bus iness or commercial enterprise occurring inside of a fully-enclosed structure that focuses on repairing and restoring older cars, often considered "collector cars" as defined by the State; which includes (1) a vehicle model 35+ years old, (2) a vehicle model 25+ years old with historic plates, or (3) a vehicle model classified as a special interest vehicle. Such restoration services return these types of vehicles to their original condition, including mechanical components, bodywork, and interior, aiming to preserve their historical authenticity and aesthetic appeal. The vehicle must not be altered from the manufacturer's original specifications or considered a "kit" car.         City Council 22 – 274 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 32 of 49 24. Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc. office: A facility other than a hospital where medical, dental, mental health, surgical, and/or other personal health care ser - vices are provided on an outpatient basis, and that accommodates no more than four licensed primary practitioners (for example, chiropractors, medical doctors, psychiatrists, etc., other than nursing staff) within an individual office suite. 25. Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex: See 'Building Types' 26. Dwelling Unit Types: a. Apartment: A rental version of a Flat, Loft, or Townhouse. b. Condominium: An ownership version of a Flat, Loft or Townhouse c. Flat: A single-story unit. d. Loft: A double-story height unit with a mezzanine. e. Townhouse: A two to three-story unit. 27. Elevation (Building): The exterior walls of a building. Also referred to as 'Facade' when the elevation is along a frontage line. 28. Entrance (Main or Primary): The principal point of access of pedestrians to a building. In the support of pedestrian activity, the main or primary entrance should be oriented to the frontage rather than to the parking. Extended Care: Residential facilities providing nursing and health-related care as a primary use with in-patient beds. Examples of these uses include: board and care homes; convalescent and rest homes; extended care facilities; and skilled nursing facilities. Long-term personal care facilities that do not emphasize medical treatment are included under "Care Homes." 29. Facade: The exterior wall of a building that is set along a frontage line. Facades support the public realm and are subject to frontage requirements additional to those required of elevations. 30. Flex Block: See 'Building Types' Forecourt: See ‘Frontage Types’ 31. Frontage Line: Those lot lines that coincide with a public street line. One shall be designated as the Principal Frontage Line. Facades along Frontage Lines define the public realm and are therefore more highly regulated than the elevations that coincide with other lot lines. Frontage lines are subject to the urban standards, architectural standards, signage standards, and subdivision standards. 32. Frontage Type: The architectural element of a building between the public right- of-way and the private property associated with the building. Frontage Types combined with the public realm create the perceptible streetscape. The following frontage types used in this Article are listed below: a. Arcade: A facade with an attached colonnade, that is covered by upper stories. This frontage type is ideal for retail use, but only when the sidewalk is fully absorbed within the arcade so that a pedestrian cannot bypass it.         City Council 22 – 275 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 33 of 49 For Building Code considerations, this frontage type cannot cover the public right- of-way. b. Forecourt: A semi-public exterior space partially within the shopfront, gallery or arcade frontage that is partially surrounded by a building and also opening to a thoroughfare forming a court. The court is suitable for gardens, outdoor dining, vehicular drop-off and utility off-loading. c. Front yard / Porch: A common frontage type associated with single family houses, where the facade is set back from the right of way with a front yard. A porch may also be appended to the facade. A fence or wall at the property line may be used to define the private space of the yard. The front yard may also be raised from the sidewalk, creating a small retaining wall at the property line with entry steps to the yard. d. Gallery: A colonnade that is attached to storefronts and projects over the sidewalk. e. Shopfront: A facade placed at or close to the right-of-way line, with the entrance at sidewalk grade. This frontage type is conventional for retail front- age and is commonly equipped with cantilevered shed roof(s) or awning(s). Recessed storefronts are also acceptable. The absence of a raised ground floor precludes residential use on the ground floor facing the street, although such use is appropriate above. f. Stoop: An elevated entry porch that corresponds directly to the building entry, with stairs placed close to the frontage line on a building with the ground story elevated from the sidewalk, securing privacy for the win dows and front rooms. This type is suitable for ground -floor residential uses with short set- backs. This type may be interspersed with the shopfront frontage type. A porch or shed roof may also cover the stoop. 33. Front yard/Porch: See 'Frontage Types' Furniture and Fixture Manufacturing, cabinet shop: The manufacture or assembly of high-grade articles of furniture and fixtures calling for fine finish, such as decorative cabinets, desks and chairs, store fixtures and office equipment. In the production of such goods, noise above 60 dB CNEL beyond the walls of the building is prohibited. 34. Gallery: see ‘Frontage Types’ 35. General Retail: Stores and shops selling many lines of merchandise. Examples of these stores and lines of merchandise include: a. art galleries, retail b. art supplies, including framing services bicycles c. books, magazines, and newspapers cameras and photographic supplies clothing, shoes, and accessories department stores         City Council 22 – 276 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 34 of 49 d. drug stores and pharmacies dry goods e. fabrics and sewing supplies f. florists and houseplant stores with indoor sales only hobby materials g. furniture and home decor stores h. hardware and building supply stores i. jewelry j. luggage and leather goods k. musical instruments (small), parts and accessories, l. Large instruments are under "Furniture, Furnishings, and Appliance Store" m. orthopedic supplies small wares specialty shops n. sporting goods and equipment stationery o. toys and games variety stores p. videos, DVDs, records, CDs, including rental stores General retail does not include the following: a. Adult business as defined in section 41-1701.6 of the SAMC, antique or collectible stores, furniture, furnishings and appliance stores, medical marijuana dispensaries or second-hand stores. b. Sheet metal shops, body-fender works, automobile paint shops, repair garages, and any activity which includes the processing, treatment, manufacturing, assembling or compounding of any product, other than that which is clearly and traditionally incidental and essential to a particular retail activity. c. Any use which is more specifically identified as a permitted use or as a use which may be permitted subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit or land use certificate in one or more use districts pursuant to this code. 36. Ground Floor/ Footprint: The area resulting from the application of building placement and open space requirements and as further articulated by particular building design. In calculating the area, only the conditioned floor space shall be counted for purposes of calculating allowable upper floor area, the area occupied by zaguans shall be counted as "ground floor/footprint." 37. Ground Floor Residential: Dwellings with their primary entrance and habitable space at grade. 38. Health and Fitness: A commercial establishment providing facilities for aerobic exercises, running and jogging, exercise equipment, game courts, swimming facilities, and saunas, showers and lockers. Health and fitness facilities may also provide for instruction programs and classes, such as martial arts, yoga where lockers and showers are provided. 39. Hotel (land use): A facility offering short-term lodging accommodations, as defined and regulated by the SAMC, to the general public and which may include additional facilities and services, such as restaurants, meeting rooms, entertainment, personal services and recreational facilities. Access to the guest rooms shall be         City Council 22 – 277 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 35 of 49 through the main lobby of the building. A hotel shall contain more than 5 guest rooms. A hotel that contains a kitchen as defined by the California Building Code (CBC) in guest rooms shall be deemed to be a long term stay business hotel as defined by the SAMC. A hotel that meets the criteria of a transient/residential hotel as defined by the SAMC, shall be deemed to be a transient/residential hotel . 40. House: See 'Building Types' 41. House Scale: Multi-family building form that is derivative of and compatible with surrounding single-family houses and that can be applied in 1 to 4 direct-access assemblies of units to form larger buildings from duplex up to and including Courtyard Housing. 42. Hybrid Court: See 'Building Types' 43. Laboratory- medical-analytical: A place equipped for experimentation or observation in a field of study, or devoted to the application of scientific principles in testing and analysis. Quantities of biological or hazardous materials used in situ, shall be limited to those quantities established by the fire department Light Manufacturing: The manufacture or assembly of products from previously treated material where no impact is created to the adjacent uses and no hazardous materials are used in the production of such products. The maximum number of employees shall be 10. Examples of light manufacturing include: athletic equipment bakeries camera, photo equipment clothing electronics musical instruments optical goods woodworking (limited) 44. Lined Block: See 'Building Types' Live/Work: See 'Building Types' 45. Lot Width: The frontage of a parcel which is used to identify the parcel for street address purposes. 46. Media production: An establishment dedicated to the production of visual and audio mass media, including television, films, videos, video games, mobile devices, internet and digital interactive media, but excludes magazines, newspapers, and periodicals. 47. Mixed-Use Building: A structure lawfully containing residential and non -residential uses. 48. Multi-Family Building: A residential structure lawfully containing two or more dwelling units.         City Council 22 – 278 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 36 of 49 49. Net Developable Area: The private area defined by blocks which is not to remain for public uses such as Plazas, Greens, Squares, Thoroughfares or Streetscapes. 50. Nonconforming Industrial Use: A nonconforming use as defined in Section 41-126 of the SAMC that was established on any parcel or within any building located within the boundaries of SD-84 established by this Article that is listed in the uses permitted or uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit of Division 18. M-1 (Light Industrial) or Division 19. M-2 (Heavy Industrial) of this Chapter but that are no longer permissible through amendment to this Article. 51. Noxious Use: A nonconforming industrial use that is located within one thousand (1,000) linear feet of a public park, school (K-12) as defined by Section 11362.768 of the Health and Safety Code, or property used or zoned for residential purposes whose primary business operations involve any two (2) or more of the following: a. Emitting, generating, or discharging of particulate materials; exhausting emissions; or handling, storing emitting or discharging regulated compounds, hazardous materials, chemicals, or substances; b. Operations that are regulated by and require a permit from a federal, state, or regional agency; c. Storing, processing, or disposing of listed or hazardous waste; or d. Operations that are not contained within a fully enclosed building. 52. A primary use is the principal and dominant activity that the business is devoted to, distinguishing it from a secondary or ancillary use as defined in Section 41-13.5 of the SAMC. 53. Office: These do not include medical offices (see Clinic, Urgent Care," and "Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc. office.") a. Service. Establishments providing direct services to consumers. Examples of these uses include employment agencies, insurance agent offices, real estate offices, travel agencies, utility company offices, elected official satellite offices, etc. This use does not include "Bank, Financial S ervices," which is separately defined. b. Administrative. Office-type facilities characterized by high employee densities, and occupied by businesses engaged in information processing, and other computer-dependent or telecommunications-based activities. Examples of these uses include: c. airline, lodging chain, and rental car company reservation centers, not including retail travel agencies d. computer software and hardware design and development consumer credit reporting e. data processing services f. health management organization (HMO) offices where no medical services are provided g. insurance claim processing         City Council 22 – 279 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 37 of 49 h. mail order and electronic commerce transaction processing telecommunications facility design and management telemarketing i. Professional. Office-type facilities occupied by businesses that provide professional services, or are engaged in the production of intellectual property. Examples of these uses include: j. accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services advertising agencies k. attorneys l. business associations, chambers of commerce commercial art and design services construction contractors (office facilities only) counseling services m. court reporting services n. detective agencies and similar services o. design services including architecture, engineering, landscape architecture, urban planning p. educational, scientific and research organizations financial management and investment counseling literary and talent agencies q. management and public relations services media postproduction services r. news services s. photographers and photography studios political campaign headquarters psychologists t. secretarial, stenographic, word processing, and temporary clerical employee services u. security and commodity brokers v. writers and artists offices 54. Paseo: a public place or path designed for walking; promenade. 55. Pedestrian First: The practice of addressing the needs of people, once out of their automobiles, through a series of interdependent urban design and streetscape principles (e.g., wide sidewalks, street trees and shade, on-street parking, outdoor dining, inviting storefronts, the feeling of being in an ‘outdoor room’, short cross - walk distances, interconnected and short blocks). 56. Pedestrian Shed: An area defined by the average distance that may be traversed at an easy pace from its edge to its center in approximately 5 minutes. This distance is used to determine the size of a neighborhood. This dimension averages one quarter of a mile or approximately 1,400 feet for generally flat terrain. 57. Personal Services: Establishments providing non-medical services to individuals as a primary use. Examples of these uses include: a. barber, nail salons and beauty shops clothing rental b. dry cleaning pick-up stores with limited equipment home electronics and small appliance repair locksmiths c. pet grooming with no boarding shoe repair shops d. tailors         City Council 22 – 280 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 38 of 49 e. These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. 58. Personal Services - Restricted: Personal services that may tend to have a blighting and/or deteriorating effect upon surrounding areas and which may need to be dispersed to minimize their adverse impacts. Examples of these uses include: a. laundromats (self-service laundries). Laundromats shall comply with the development and performance standards set forth in Section 41-199. b. massage establishments (licensed, therapeutic) as defined on Section 41 - 1751 of the SAMC. Massage establishments shall comply with Article XVII.I of Chapter 41 of the SAMC. Pawnshops. 59. Pet day care facility: Establishment offering daily, without overnight, care to a customer’s personal canine or feline pets. Grooming and educational training may be allowed as an ancillary use within the establishment. Does not include veterinary care or treatment, hospitalizations, or long-term boarding of pets. 60. Planter: The layer of the streetscape which accommodates street trees. Planters may be continuous or individual according to the Thoroughfare and location within the neighborhood. 61. Podium: A continuous raised platform supporting a building, or a large block of two or three stories beneath a multi-layer block of a smaller area. 62. Porch: see ‘Frontage Types’ 63. Private Frontage: The privately held layer between the frontage line and the principal building facade. The structures and landscaping within are held to specific standards. The variables of Private Frontage are the depth of the setback and the combination of architectural elements such as fences, stoops, porches and galleries. These elements inf luence social behavior in the public realm. The Frontage layer may overlap the public streetscape in the case of awnings, Galleries and Arcades. 64. Research and Development: A quasi-industrial facility where creative work is undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge generally in the fields of medicine, scientific instruments, safety- critical mechanism or high technology. These facilities may include pilot plant operations as an ancillary use, which shall not exceed 25 percent of the floor area. A facility providing full scale production shall be deemed a manufacturing use and shall be prohibited. 65. Rowhouse: See 'Building Types' 66. Setback: The area of a lot measured from a lot line to a building facade or elevation that must be maintained clear of permanent structures excepting galleries, fences, garden walls, arcades, porches, stoops, balconies, bay windows, and terraces         City Council 22 – 281 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 39 of 49 which are permitted to encroach into the setback subject to the standards established in Division 3 of this Article. 67. Shared Parking (Park-Once Policy): An accounting for parking spaces that are avail- able to more than one function. The requirement is based on a range of parking- demand found in mature, mixed-use centers. The Shared Parking ratio varies according to multiple functions in close proximity unlikely to require the spaces at the same time. This approach to parking uses the following types of parking in combination to achieve a balanced and distributed supply of parking: off-street (surface lots and garages), on-street (parallel and diagonal). 68. Shopfront: see ‘Frontage Types’ 69. Stacked Dwellings: See 'Building Types' 70. Stoop: see ‘Frontage Types’ 71. Story: A habitable level within a building from finished floor to finished ceiling: Attics and basements, as defined by the California Building Code (CBC) are not considered a story for the purposes of determining building height and are subject to the applicable requirements of this code and the CBC, except for when the finished floor level directly above a basement or cellar is more than six feet above grade, such basement or cellar shall be considered a story 72. Streetscape: The urban element that provides the major part of the public realm as well as paved lanes for vehicles. A streetscape is endowed with two attributes: capacity and context. Capacity is the number of vehicles that can move safely through a segment within a given time period. It is physically manifested by the number of lanes and their width, and by the curb radius. 73. Studio: A workplace of one or more individuals who are engaged in the production of art, such as fine and fiber arts, lithography, calligraphy, photography, music, dance and the performing arts. Galleries, not to exceed 50 percent of the floor area, are permitted as an ancillary use. Any regulated use, as defined on Sec 41 - 191 of the SAMC is not allowed. Uses meeting the definition of artisan/craft product manufacturing shall be deemed an artisan/craft product manufacturing use. 74. Tandem Parking Stall: Two or more parking spaces arranged one behind the other. 75. Thoroughfare: A vehicular way incorporating moving lanes and parking lanes (except alleys/lanes which have no parking lanes) within a right-of-way. 76. Tower-on-Podium: See 'Building Types' 77. Trade school: A school consisting of vocational educational programs for students to be trained in the fields related to healthcare, technology, legal services, and professional trades.         City Council 22 – 282 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 40 of 49 78. Traffic-Calming: A set of techniques which serves to reduce the speed of traffic. Such strategies include lane-narrowing, on-street parking, chicanes, yield points, sidewalk bulge-outs, speed bumps, surface variations, mid-block deflections, and visual clues. Traffic calming is a retrofit technique unnecessary when thoroughfares are correctly designed for the appropriate speed at initial construction. 79. Transect: A system of classification deploying the conceptual range of ‘rural-to- urban’ to arrange in useful order, the typical context groupings of natural and urban areas. This gradient, when rationalized and subdivided into zones becomes the basis of the Regulating Plan and the 9 zones supporting this Plan. 80. Transit-Oriented Development: A remedial pattern within a loose urbanized area. Its structure creates nodes at an efficient spacing for commuter or light rail. These nodes are mixed-use areas limited in extent by walking distance to the transit stop. These nodes are usually surrounded by a residential hinterland, structured as neighborhood T.O.D.’s connected by a feeder bus system. 81. Transition Line: A horizontal line, the full width of a facade expressed by a material change or by a continuous horizontal articulation such as a cornice or a balcony. 82. Tuck-under Housing: See 'Building Types' 83. Zaguan: A covered pedestrian passage between courts of one to two rooms in depth and one story in height.” Section 13. Any section or subsection of this Article, Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) that is not reprinted or modified by this ordinance is hereby unamended. Section 14. Any provision of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) or appendices thereto found inconsistent with the provisions of the Ordinance, only to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance, inclusive of correc tions for typographical error, and shall be considered the same as if adopted at the time of this Ordinance. Section 15. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitu tional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 16. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, Ordinance Nos. NS-3063 and NS- 3064 shall be automatically repealed and rescinded as of that date.         City Council 22 – 283 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 41 of 49 Section 17. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2025. ________________________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: _________________________ Melissa M. Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: _________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: _________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, ____________________, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-_______ to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ___________________, 2025 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: ______________________ ________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana         City Council 22 – 284 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 42 of 49 EXHIBIT “A” A. On April 19, 2022, The City adopted an Amended General Plan. The Amended General Plan became effective on May 26, 2022 and adopted a new Land Use Plan for the City and established new land use designations and policies for development of the City. B. On April 16, 2024, the City Council passed an Urgency Ordinance to adopt a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (Moratorium Ordinance”). No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately protect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents and businesses from incompatible industrial uses that cause a significant pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD84 Zoning District. C. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). D. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted an extension of the Moratorium Ordinance for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the California Government Code, Section 65858. The extension was necessary to allow sufficient time for staff to continue with conduct research of appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to develop appropriate zoning regulation to address the impacts of industrial development in the SD84 Zoning District. E. The Planning and Building Agency routinely reviews its ordinances to incorporate best practices, reflect changes to State law, and address community needs. F. In adopting the Moratorium on April 16, 2024, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana established the following findings, all of which below remain true, applicable and necessary to support the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 amending certain portions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District: 1. The Transit Zoning Code (TZC), located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010, and amended on July 16, 2019; and         City Council 22 – 285 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 43 of 49 2. Upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; and 3. The goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian- oriented development framework to support the addition of new, and enhancement of existing communities through, transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and 4. Industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and 5. The TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until su ch time that properties were developed or improved to the mixed-use zones allowed by the TZC; and 6. Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called “disadvantaged communities”, in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision - making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and 7. The City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and 8. The Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana’s General Plan update complied wit h all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and 9. As required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all its elements, which include 77         City Council 22 – 286 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 44 of 49 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and 10. Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE -5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and 11. The industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and 12. The Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican -American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century; and 13. The construction of Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in many families being displaced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and 14. In the 1970s, a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and 15. The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and 16. Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and         City Council 22 – 287 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 45 of 49 17. The updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, they are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations—both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and 18. There are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conf licts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 35 commercial and industrial properties in the past twelve months and currently has 16 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and 19. In the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently near sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and 20. In the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently near sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration         City Council 22 – 288 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 46 of 49 impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored b y socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and 21. There is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very- low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and 22. There is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor’s yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and st orage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and 23. The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023 to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and 24. MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. Since adoption of the moratorium and its extension, MIG and City staff have focused the comprehensive update through an initial phase concentrating on amending the TZC; and 25. The policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and         City Council 22 – 289 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 47 of 49 26. Given these concerns, the City Council directed that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district. G. Following said analysis of the City Council points of discussion as iterated above, City staff has prepared ZOA No. 2024-02 to amend and add certain sections to Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend non - conforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and non -conforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District. H. Amendments to Chapter 41 (Zoning) are necessary to ensure uniform and legally consistent regulations as well as additions to enable the City to implement a regulatory framework that protects the health, safety, and welfare of the City. I. The proposed amendments to the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) that are the subject of this Ordinance support the objectives and policies of the City’s General Plan and are required to ensure consistency in accordance with Government Code Section 65860. J. Specifically, these amendments to the SAMC timely address current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be incon sistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU -1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: 1. Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life;         City Council 22 – 290 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 48 of 49 2. Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; 3. Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance or elimination of those uses; 4. Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; 5. Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC; 6. Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit pollution near sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; 7. Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and 8. Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. K. Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: 1. LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. 2. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. 3. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries.         City Council 22 – 291 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 49 of 49 4. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. 5. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. 6. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. 7. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities related to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. L. ZOA No. 2024-02 amends and adds certain sections to Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including Section 41-2001 (Application of Article), Section 41-2001.5 (Organization), Section 41-2002 (Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses), Section 41-2004 (The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone), Section 41-2005 (Application for Discretionary Approvals), Section 41-2006 (Zones Established), Section 41-2007 (Uses Permitted) Section 41-2008 (Operational Standards), Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses), and Section 41-2080 (Definitions). M. On February 24, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this Ordinance, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and recommended approval of the Ordinance to the City Council. N. On March 18, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this Ordinance, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard.         City Council 22 – 292 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 1 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024-03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD-84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has, by separate action taken on March 18, 2025, adopted an Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact report (“EIR”) (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100), which was certified on June 7, 2010, by the City Council (“Addendum”). The Addendum analyzed the environmental impacts of the actions taken in this Ordinance. Adopting the Adden dum satisfied the City Council’s obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) regarding amendments to the Transit Zoning Code and none of the conditions in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines 15162 apply. Thu s, no further environmental review is required as adoption of this Ordinance falls within the scope of the adopted Addendum and previously certified EIR. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. Chapter 41, Article I, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code provides that “Because of the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land; and regulating the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open spaces, the City is divided into land-use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulatio ns and provide for their enforcement. The regulations are considered necessary in order to: (a) Encourage the most appropriate use of land; (b) Conserve and stabilize property value, (c) Provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, (d) Prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and         City Council 22 – 293 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 2 of 7 (e) Promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City.” Consistent with this purpose, the City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map, which has since been amended from time to time. B. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted an Amended General Plan The Amended General Plan became effective on May 26, 2022 and adopted a new Land Use Plan for the City and established new lan d use designations and policies for development of the City. C. On April 16, 2024, the City Council passed an Urgency Ordinance to adopt a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the T ransit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (the “Moratorium Ordinance”). The purpose of the Moratorium Ordinance was to immediately protect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents and businesses from incompatible industrial uses that cause a significant pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD -84 Zoning District. D. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code Specific Development No. 84. E. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted an extension of the Moratorium Ordinance for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to California Government Code , Section 65858. The extension was necessary to allow sufficient time for staff to continue with conduct research of appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to develop appropriate zoning regulation to address the impacts of industrial development in the SD -84 Zoning District. F. After continued research and study, two ordinances have been developed that address the impacts from industrial land uses in the SD -84 Zoning District. The ordinances address the following: a. Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 to amend certain provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and amend portions of the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amendment of non- conforming regulations; and, b. Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to remove the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties         City Council 22 – 294 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 3 of 7 within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. G. AA No. 2024-03 is consistent with and implements the amendments proposed by ZOA No. 2024-02 by ensuring uniform and legally consistent mapping of the City’s Zoning Districts; and enables the City to implement a regulatory framework that protects the health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents. H. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map contained in AA No. 2024 - 03 are required to ensure consistency with the City’s General Plan in accordance with California Government Code, Section 65860. I. Adoption of AA No. 20243 is consistent with and implements the Amended General Plan. Specifically, it is consistent with the following: The amendments timely address current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. (a) Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), (b) Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development) (c) Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), (d) Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), (e) Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), (f) Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), (g) Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), (h) Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), (i) Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), (j) Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts); (k) Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), (l) Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and (m) Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development) which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: 1. Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life; 2. Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; 3. Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses;         City Council 22 – 295 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 4 of 7 4. Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; 5. Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC; 6. Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit increased pollution new sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; 7. Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and 8. Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. J. Additionally, AA No. 2024-03 implements and/or contributes to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: 1. LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. 2. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. 3. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. 4. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. 5. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community.         City Council 22 – 296 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 5 of 7 6. HE5.C - Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. 7. HE44.A - Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts and approves the Amendment to the Official Zoning Map of the City of Santa Ana, as shown in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for City Council Action dated March 18, 2025, and exhibits attached hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstituti onal by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and e ach section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2025. ________________________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor         City Council 22 – 297 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 6 of 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: _________________________ Melissa Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: _________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: _________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, ____________________, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-_______ to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ___________________, 2024 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: ______________________ ________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana         City Council 22 – 298 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 7 of 7 Exhibit A         City Council 22 – 299 4/1/2025 1 EXHIBIT 4 Environmental Health Reports EXHIBIT 4.1- Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA-EPA) The map illustrates Disadvantaged Communities within Santa Ana as identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), with the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods shown in red in the central core of the city. The map below highlights the Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) within the City of Santa Ana, with both Logan and Lacy neighborhoods falling into that category. The CalEPA has responsibility for identifying those communities and CalEPA’s designation of disadvantaged communities must be based on “geographic, socioeconomic, public he alth, and environmental hazard” criteria. CalEPA DACs affect an entire or a portion of thirty-three of Santa Ana’s neighborhoods.         City Council 22 – 300 4/1/2025 2 EXHIBIT 4.2- Center for Disease Control/ Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ ATSDR) The CDC/ATSDR Environmental Justice Index Map illustrates environmental health burdens in Santa Ana's Lacy neighborhood. The data shows significant environmental justice concerns, with the area ranking high (0.89) for overall air pollution impacts. Specifically, the neighborhood shows elevated exposure levels for Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 (0.97), Diesel Particulate Matter (0.76), and Air Toxics Cancer Risk (0.76).         City Council 22 – 301 4/1/2025 3 EXHIBIT 4.2- Center for Disease Control/ Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ ATSDR) (Continued) The CDC/ATSDR Environmental Justice Index Map demonstrates significant environmental burdens in Santa Ana's Logan neighborhood. The data indicates high environmental justice concerns, with an air pollution ranking of 0.90. Specifically, the area shows severe exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 (0.97), Diesel Particulate Matter (0.76), and Air Toxics Cancer Risk (0.78).         City Council 22 – 302 4/1/2025 4 EXHIBIT 4.3- City of Santa Ana Overview, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The EPA's Environmental Justice screening map illustrates the City of Santa Ana's environmental burden distribution. This data aligns with CalEnviroScreen 4.0 findings and highlights the concentration of environmental impacts in the central urban core, where industrial uses continue to affect long-established residential communities.         City Council 22 – 303 4/1/2025 5 EXHIBIT 4.3.1- Particulate Matter (PM 2.5) for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 reflecting a heavy burden of 95% and above in the percentile score         City Council 22 – 304 4/1/2025 6 EXHIBIT 4.3.2- Air Toxics Cancer Risk for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The EPA’s Environmental Justice map and screening tool uses national consistent data combining environmental and demographic indicators in maps and reports. The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Air Toxics Cancer Risk, reflecting at 90% or higher.         City Council 22 – 305 4/1/2025 7 EXHIBIT 4.3.3- Hazardous Waste Proximity for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Hazardous Water Proximity, showing a percentile of 95% or above.         City Council 22 – 306 4/1/2025 8 EXHIBIT 4.3.4- Diesel Particulate Matter for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Diesel Particulate Matter indicating percentiles above 90%.         City Council 22 – 307 4/1/2025 9 EXHIBIT 4.3.5- Toxic Release to Air for Logan and Lacy Community, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The map below indicates the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Toxic Releases to Air showing a high percentile score of 90%.         City Council 22 – 308 4/1/2025 10 EXHIBIT 4.4- City of Santa Ana Overview, Healthy Places Index (HPI) The Healthy Places Index (HPI) comprises a data and policy platform to advance equitable community investments, develop critical programs and policies and advance health equity through open and accessible data. The map below captures the City of Santa Ana, which indicates that the majority of the City of Santa Ana’s neighborhoods rank on the LOW scale of the healthy community conditions, as seen in the dark blue and light blue layers.         City Council 22 – 309 4/1/2025 11 EXHIBIT 4.4- City of Santa Ana Overview, Healthy Places Index (HPI), Lacy Neighborhood (Continued) Using the HPI mapping tool, the Lacy neighborhood ranks at a 9.6% of the least healthy community conditions.         City Council 22 – 310 4/1/2025 12 EXHIBIT 4.4- City of Santa Ana Overview, Healthy Places Index (HPI), Logan Neighborhood (Continued) Using the HPI mapping tool, the Logan neighborhood ranks on the LOW end, showing nearly 11% of the least healthy community conditions.         City Council 22 – 311 4/1/2025 13 EXHIBIT 4.5- CalEnviroScreen 4.0- Logan and Lacy Neighborhoods The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 provides an insight into vulnerable communities that are most affected by pollution burdens, with special consideration on race and ethnicity. The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana at 90% or above as being burdened by pollution.         City Council 22 – 312 4/1/2025 1 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. SD-84/Transit Zoning Code (TZC) Moratorium and Ordinance Amendment Frequently Asked Questions This document provides information about the Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84) zoning district, otherwise known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), moratorium and the proposed ordinance amendment. Please note, the information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only. Interested parties should review the proposed Moratorium text and the Ordinance text for detailed information and applicability. 1. When does the moratorium expire? The Transit Zoning Code (TZC/ SD-84) is a special zoning district in central Santa Ana designed to create a pedestrian-friendly, transit-oriented community while protecting existing neighborhoods. TZC industrial moratorium began with Ordinance No. NS-3063 on April 16, 2024, as a 45-day urgency measure. The City Council then adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 on May 21, 2024, extending the moratorium for an additional ten months and fifteen days. The current moratorium will expire on April 15, 2025. 2. Why was the moratorium adopted? The City Council adopted the TZC industrial moratorium on April 16, 2024 to immediately protect public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses causing significant pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the TZC district. The action addressed historical land use conflicts in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, where industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, expanded, or intensified despite the area's 2010 transit-oriented zoning designation. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data confirms these neighborhoods rank at 90 percent or above among California's most pollution-burdened communities, with documented exposure to various environmental hazards. The existing Industrial Overlay Zone (I-OZ) created inconsistencies with the General Plan's mixed-use designations and allowed industrial uses to continue operating near residential areas. 3. What impact does the moratorium have on business permits and future development? The moratorium prohibits the establishment of new, or expansion or intensification of existing, industrial businesses within the TZC. Existing industrial businesses can obtain permits for work that is for routine maintenance, or of a similar nature, that does not result in new, expanded or intensified use. The moratorium does not impact residential, commercial, or mixed-use development in the TZC plan area. 4. How does the proposed permanent ordinance to amend the TZC propose to regulate industrial intensification within the plan area? The ordinance would remove the industrial overlay and remove industrial type uses from the permitted uses table in the TZC. The removal of the overlay and of industrial type uses from the permitted uses table would render all existing industrial businesses within the plan area as nonconforming, thereby prohibiting the expansion of the existing industrial businesses and the establishment of new industrial businesses in the plan area. Moreover, the ordinance would prohibit intensification of nonconforming industrial uses, meaning the businesses would be prohibited from expanding operations that result in more potential impacts. 5. Does this impact commercial businesses or residential uses? The proposed amendments primarily address industrial uses within the TZC district. Commercial businesses that are         City Council 22 – 313 4/1/2025 2 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. compatible with mixed-use and transit-oriented development will continue to be permitted uses in the TZC. The amendments aim to enhance the compatibility between residential areas and neighboring businesses by removing industrial uses that create environmental and health impacts. These changes support the original 2010 TZC vision of creating a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework that strengthens the area's mixed-use character while protecting existing residential neighborhoods. The amendments focus on safeguarding the residential communities in the area from industrial impacts while maintaining appropriate commercial activities that serve neighborhood needs. 6. How does this ordinance compare to similar policies in other cities? Most cities, including the City of Santa Ana, regulate nonconforming uses and structures. Several cities also include abatement or amortization processes to further regulate and terminate nonconforming uses and structures to advance overall land use policy direction. A few cities target termination of specific nonconformities, such as adult entertainment, industrial uses, and billboards or other types of signage, or certain types of buildings or structures. The City of National City has a well-established industrial amortization program, reviewing and ranking various businesses to be prioritized for amortization. 7. What are the differences between the M1 and M2 overlay, and how does it impact businesses within each zone? The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone is currently applied to areas that were zoned M1 (Light Industrial) or M2 (Heavy Industrial) and occupied with an industrial use when the TZC was originally adopted in 2010. As written, this overlay allows the type of land use activity and development permitted by the M1 and M2 zoning districts to continue until such time that the owner chooses to develop to the standards in the new residential and mixed-use zones that were applied to all of the properties within the plan area when the TZC was originally adopted. In order to determine if the M1 or M2 land use activity and development apply to a particular parcel, the I-OZ was further identified on the regulating plan (map) as I-OZ-M1 or I-OZ- M2. 8. Why is the City considering permitting residential on industrial properties? All of the properties within the TZC were assigned zones that permit residential and/or mixed-use development in 2010, when the plan was originally adopted. The proposed ordinance would not change or affect the zones that are already applicable to the properties within the boundary of the TZC. Rather, the proposed ordinance would simply remove the industrial overlay that was applied to certain properties within the plan area that had existing industrial businesses when the plan was adopted in 2010. 9. Why does the proposed ordinance prohibit the conversion of residential land uses or buildings to non-residential uses in the UN-1 and UN-2 zones of the TZC? UN-1 and UN-2 zones are applied to primarily residential areas intended to accommodate a variety of housing types, with some opportunities for live-work, neighborhood serving retail and cafes. The proposed ordinance would prohibit the conversion of residential uses/building to non-residential uses in these areas to strengthen and stabilize the low intensity residential nature of these         City Council 22 – 314 4/1/2025 3 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. neighborhoods, while still allowing some limited neighborhood-serving commercial uses on properties that are already non-residential in nature. 10. How will this ordinance affect businesses that want to sell or transfer ownership to future owners? As proposed, the ordinance will not affect the transferability of nonconforming industrial uses, as defined in the ordinance, to future owners. However, the nonconforming status of a business that meets the definition of a Noxious Use, as defined in the TZC, would lose its nonconforming status when the business ownership changes or if it meets the code enforcement thresholds established in the proposed ordinance. 11. How does the City determine when a business has transferred to new ownership? All businesses operating in commercial locations must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy (COO) from the Planning Division before receiving a business license, while those in residential areas must secure a Home Occupation Permit. A new COO is required whenever a business changes its use, changes ownership, changes location, expands, or changes its name. Businesses that do not apply and obtain a COO may face code enforcement action. 12. What is a nonconforming use? A nonconforming use is a use that was lawful when established but became unlawful due to new or amended ordinances. These uses are sometimes referred to as "grandfathered" uses and are typically allowed to continue without expansion or intensification. The SAMC defines “nonconforming uses” generally as uses initiated before July 20, 1960, or those that were compliant with applicable provisions when established but later became nonconforming due to code changes or public agency property acquisition. 13. What is amortization? Amortization is a tool that provides a reasonable transition period for owners to phase out a nonconforming use. This "grace period" allows owners to recoup their investments before the use must cease, and serves as a lawful equivalent to “just compensation.” Under the proposed ordinance, the City may consider amortizing certain nonconforming industrial uses based on factors enumerated in the ordinance. If the City elects to eliminate a use through amortization, a reasonable amortization period would be determined by an independent hearing officer be based on an individualized assessment. 14. The proposed ordinance references the use of a Hearing Officer for determining amortization periods in cases where the City elects to pursue elimination of a business/use through that mechanism. Who serves as hearing officer and what educational/professional background do they have? Hearing officers typically possess a background in law, urban planning, public administration, or a related field, and are already on retainer by the City of Santa Ana to adjudicate certain code enforcement appeals and other matters. Cities often utilize hearing officers to provide a neutral and impartial forum for dispute resolution, thereby increasing procedural fairness and public trust. Additionally, hearing officers often bring specialized expertise in navigating complex regulatory frameworks, which can streamline the hearing process and lead to more informed decision-making. The proposed ordinance requires that any hearing officer retained for the purposes of administering the amortization provisions must possess land use and legal background.         City Council 22 – 315 4/1/2025 4 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. 15. What industrial businesses would be considered nonconforming if the ordinance were adopted as proposed? The proposed ordinance defines nonconforming industrial use as a use established on any parcel or within any building located within the boundaries of the TZC that is listed in the uses permitted or uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit of the M1 (Light Industrial) or M2 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts but that are no longer permissible through the proposed amendment. As such, all industrial businesses would be considered nonconforming if the ordinance were adopted as proposed. 16. What are the differences between a nonconforming industrial use and a noxious use? A nonconforming industrial use is a use established on any parcel or within any building located within the boundaries of TZC that is listed in the uses permitted or uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit of the M1 (Light Industrial) or M2 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts but that are no longer permissible through the proposed amendment. A noxious use, as the term is defined and used in the proposed ordinance, is a nonconforming industrial use that is located within one thousand (1,000) linear feet of a public park, school (K-12) as defined by Section 11362.768 of the Health and Safety Code, or property used or zoned for residential purposes whose primary business operations involve any two or more of the following: 1) Emitting, generating, or discharging of particulate materials; exhausting emissions; or handling, storing emitting or discharging regulated compounds, hazardous materials, chemicals, or substances; 2) Operations that are regulated by and require a permit from a federal, state, or regional agency; 3) Storing, processing, or disposing of listed or hazardous waste; or 4) Operations that are not contained within a fully enclosed building. If an existing industrial business does not meet the criteria included in the definition of a noxious use, then it is considered a nonconforming industrial use. However, if the nonconforming industrial use meets the criteria of noxious use, then the business is also considered a noxious use. 17. How is artisan/craft product – limited production defined in the proposed ordinance? Artisan/craft product - limited production is defined as a specialized commercial facility with a retail-facing operation open to the public. Products are typically made by hand or with a restricted level of automation demonstrating an artistic skill. On-site production of artisan/craft product activities include design, production, processing, printing, assembly, treatment, testing, repair, and packaging, as well as any incidental storage. Typical artisan/craft products include, but are not limited to, electronics, food products, furniture-making, beverages, leather products, clocks and watches, jewelry, clothing/apparel, metal work, furniture and fine woodworking, glass, ceramics, paper and paper products, soaps, perfumes, and lotions, together with ancillary training and/or educational program activities. 18. What adjustments can be made to operational business hours to mitigate noise concerns? The proposed ordinance does not include language modifying noise standards. However, the proposed ordinance does include hours of operation that would apply to nonconforming industrial uses, which would limit noise impacts experienced by residents of the area. The TZC currently requires approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for any business operating between 12:00 a.m. (midnight) and 7:00 a.m. During the CUP consideration process, the Planning         City Council 22 – 316 4/1/2025 5 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Commission may approve specific conditions of approval to address individual noise concerns on a per-application basis. 19. Can the City require a CUP and conditions of approval for noise regulation to existing nonconforming industrial businesses as done for late-night establishments? A CUP and conditions of approval cannot be applied retroactively. The TZC currently requires a conditional use permit for late-night operations, and through Planning Commission approval of conditions of approval, noise-generating activities can be addressed on a per-application basis. 20. How were noise level limits determined, and do they align with City standards? There are no proposed modifications to the TZC’s existing noise standards. 21. What standards are proposed to mitigate air contaminants from industrial businesses? The proposed TZC amendments require all operations to be conducted within enclosed buildings, with measures to prevent dust, smoke, and other air contaminants. While businesses must comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permit requirements, it's important to note that regulatory agencies rely on self-reported emissions data rather than independent measurements. The City's standards require enclosed operations, proper materials handling, and controlled loading activities. For specific requirements, please refer to Section 41- 2009 of the proposed ordinance regarding Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses. 22. How does truck idling impact the environment, and how can it be controlled? Truck idling releases high levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM 2.5), contributing to respiratory diseases, cardiovascular illnesses, and increased cancer risks, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 2023) and California Air Resources Board (CARB, 2023). While anti-idling laws exist, enforcement by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is limited due to resource constraints and the requirement for in-person violation confirmation, making stricter enforcement and alternative mitigation strategies essential (SCAQMD, 2024). 23. What role do external agencies play in regulating businesses in this area? Several agencies regulate air and water quality to protect public health and the environment. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets national air quality standards under the Clean Air Act (CAA), while California Air Resources Board (CARB) enforces statewide pollution and emissions regulations. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) oversees regional air quality compliance in Southern California through permitting, monitoring, and enforcement programs. Additionally, the California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) and its regional boards regulate industrial wastewater discharge and water pollution under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act to safeguard water resources. 24. Are these agencies issuing and enforcing permits for air quality and other regulations? Yes, businesses must obtain emissions permits under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and CARB regulations, with periodic reporting required to maintain compliance. However, the City’s experience with these outside agencies shows that enforcement is often limited, as violations must be witnessed         City Council 22 – 317 4/1/2025 6 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. in real time by an inspector, who may take up to three hours to respond, with restricted weekend availability. Additionally, video evidence of violations is not accepted under current policies, making enforcement more challenging. 25. Is there ongoing air quality testing in the TZC? Yes. Air quality monitoring in this area is conducted through multiple agencies. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) provides regular monitoring and responds to community complaints. The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data tracks ongoing pollution measurements, confirming these neighborhoods rank in the 90th percentile for pollution burden. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) environmental justice mapping provides additional air quality monitoring data. 26. How are violations currently tracked, and what code enforcement reports exist? City staff have an internal process established which tracks and monitors incoming notice of compliance and notice of violations given to a particular business/operator from federal, state, or regional regulatory agencies. However, this process is dependent on the collaborative communication with external regulatory agencies’ reports and enforcement, which has been limited. 27. What measurable environmental impacts justify this ordinance? Data from CalEnviroScreen 4.0 ranks the TZC plan area among the top 90 percent of California’s most pollution-impacted areas, with high emissions from toxic releases, traffic, and diesel particulate matter. According to the EPA and CDC, prolonged exposure to these pollutants has led to 58 percent of children suffering from asthma, 84 percent of newborns having low birth weight, and 49 percent of residents experiencing cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, asthma-related emergency room visits in TZC are 117 percent higher than in the nearby city of Tustin (CDHHS, 2019), underscoring the urgent need for stricter air quality regulations. 28. Can the City address environmental concerns in the area without displacing or forcing businesses to relocate/close? The proposed ordinance aims to address the quality-of-life issues experienced by residents in the area through adoption of operating and development standards that would be applicable to industrial businesses, and by establishing a framework for amortization that the City may use for businesses that meet certain factors. Nonconforming industrial uses that comply with all applicable standards, would be permitted to remain in their current location and would not be forced to relocate or close. 29. What programs or alternative solutions exist for impacted businesses? Impacted businesses can continue to operate in their current locations, provided they comply with all applicable operating and development standards. 30. How does this ordinance affect financial factors such as jobs, tax revenue, economic growth? The proposed ordinance amendments do not require any immediate closure of businesses within the affected area. Should individual business owners and property owners elect to modify business operations, cease operations, or redevelop properties with new uses, financial factors would be evaluated on a per-application basis. Therefore, estimating any financial impacts of the proposed ordinance would be speculative.         City Council 22 – 318 4/1/2025 7 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. 31. What steps have been taken to ensure effective community engagement? The City has implemented a community engagement strategy that includes multiple formats and opportunities for participation. Since April 16, 2024, engagement efforts have included a community information meeting at the Santa Ana Train Station; regular in-person meetings at City Hall with business stakeholders and residents, together, with opportunities for discussion; field visits to affected neighborhoods have allowed for direct observation and community input in context; and tours of industrial businesses. The Planning Commission Study Session and subsequent public hearings have and will also offer formal venues for community feedback. Additionally, the City maintains a dedicated project webpage (www.santa-ana.org/transit- zoning-code-update/) that provides regular updates, meeting materials, and upcoming engagement opportunities, as well as contact information for project staff. Additional outreach has included neighborhood-specific sessions with Lacy and Logan residents, one-on-one consultations, direct email communications, phone calls, and coordination through the Environmental Justice Action Committee. 32. How does this ordinance promote common ground among stakeholders? The City ensured business owners and residents were informed about the meetings through door-to-door canvassing by City staff, as well as announcements on the City’s website, NextDoor, Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services’ (NIES) Mailer, and the NIES Newsletter. These efforts facilitated open communication and engagement, fostering collaboration among stakeholders. 33. How can the public be involved in the process? The public can participate through multiple channels. Community members can attend public hearings and Planning Commission meetings, visit the project webpage at www.santa-ana.org/transit-zoning-code-update/ for current information and updates, and contact the Planning Division directly with questions or concerns. The City continues to hold focused community meetings and maintains open communication with residents, business owners, and stakeholders throughout this process. 34. What additional outreach efforts should be made before implementation? The City has established robust interdepartmental and interagency coordination to support implementation. The City maintain active collaboration with Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) regarding safety compliance and emergency response planning, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for technical guidance on air quality monitoring and compliance. Internal coordination continues between City departments including the Planning Division, Code Enforcement Division, Santa Ana Police Department, and the Public Works Agency to ensure comprehensive implementation oversight. The City's Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services team coordinates with federal and state agencies including CalEPA's Environmental Justice Team and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to identify additional resources and support for affected communities. The Environmental Justice Action Committee, comprising residents, community organizations, and agency representatives, helps guide implementation priorities. Given these established partnerships and communication channels, the City is prepared to move forward with implementation while maintaining these collaborative relationships to ensure effective oversight and responsive community support.         City Council 22 – 319 4/1/2025 8 Disclaimer: The information provided in this FAQ is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. 35. How does the TZC compare to the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area? The TZC area and West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area have fundamentally different General Plan land use designations and regulatory frameworks. The TZC was established in 2010 with mixed-use General Plan designations throughout, but retained an Industrial Overlay Zone (I-OZ) that allowed industrial uses to continue, creating inconsistencies. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area has its own distinct General Plan designations and does not have an industrial overlay. The proposed ordinance would remove the TZC's Industrial Overlay Zone, bringing its zoning into alignment with its mixed-use General Plan designations and supporting the area's intended transit-oriented, pedestrian-friendly development pattern. 36. Will this process be applied to other parts of the City? The proposed ordinance amendments will only affect the area zoned as the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84). The City is also underway with a comprehensive Zoning Code Update, which is a separate and ongoing effort to update and modernize the City’s Zoning Code to reflect the goals and values of the General Plan Update from 2022. 37. What type of environmental document pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) will be prepared for this project? The City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that the proposed ordinance and map amendment are subject to CEQA guidelines and regulations (Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21000-21177). An Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearing House (SCH) No. 2006071100) has been prepared by the City to evaluate the impacts of the proposed ordinance amendments.         City Council 22 – 320 4/1/2025 28.Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (“SD-84”), Also Known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”) for Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a) Legal notice published in the Orange County Reporter on May 6, 2024. Department(s): Recommended Action: 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance extending a moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within SD-84, by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), for an additional 10 months and 15 days. UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) MONTHS AND FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project.         City Council 22 – 321 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 28 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report May 21, 2024 TOPIC: Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 AGENDA TITLE Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (“SD-84”), Also Known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”) for Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a) Legal notice published in the Orange County Reporter on May 6, 2024. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance extending a moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within SD-84, by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), for an additional 10 months and 15 days. UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) MONTHS AND FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No         City Council 22 – 322 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 2 4 2 7 9         City Council 22 – 323 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 3 4 2 7 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 Zoning District through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of this Moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84) through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, proximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness. During the moratorium, the City is not issuing permits that result in the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the Transit Zoning Code (TZC). Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the Moratorium shall have no further force and effect 45-days from the date of its adoption, which was April 16, 2024, unless extended. An extension requires the City Council issue a written report ten days prior to the expiration of the Moratorium, or extension thereof, describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Moratorium, provide notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, and hold a public hearing. Government Code Section 65858(a) allows an extension for 10 months and 15 days and a subsequent extension for one year. An extension also requires a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the Moratorium. City staff has determined that an extension of the Moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code is necessary to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to provide a complete analysis and thorough evaluation of the more than 130 industrial businesses within the TZC. An extension of the Moratorium would provide sufficient time to enable staff to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would address industrial land uses in the TZC.         City Council 22 – 324 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 4 4 2 7 9 DISCUSSION Background Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the Moratorium, staff conducted an interagency meeting, which included representatives from multiple City departments. These departments include the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Moreover, engagement with additional agencies such as the Police Department, Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities are intertwined with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that the application of the Moratorium affects more than 130 industrial businesses in the TZC. Of these, over one-dozen have active applications for permits, the majority of which are to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties and address ongoing Code Enforcement Division notices of violation. City staff continue to gather, review, and analyze information regarding affected industrial businesses within the TZC. Specific data and reporting pertains to applications submitted by industrial businesses for permits, entitlements, certificates of occupancy, business licenses, and other relevant records immediately prior to and following the adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance and currently under review by City staff. Requests for information on calls for service and incident activities responded to by public safety departments of the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) and the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) are being reviewed by City staff to understand and validate public safety concerns or impacts shared by neighbors in disadvantaged communities with actual calls and emergencies reported. Initial reports from the SAPD show calls for service in the TZC totaling 18,510 calls between March 2023 and April 2024. These calls for service included patrol checks, car stops, disturbances, alarm activation, trespassing, and many more types of calls for service. Of the 18,510 calls for service, 1,909 incidents reported were related to collisions, impounded vehicles, hit and run collisions, domestic violence, and Santa Ana municipal code violations. Similarly, data from OCFA shows 62 calls for service in 2022 and 66 calls for service for 2023 for a combined 128 calls for service for both 2022 and 2023 for advanced life support-related emergencies. Specifically, 29 of the service calls responded to by OCFA in 2022 were related to health stemming from respiratory concerns to chest pain and cardiac arrest, along with long-term diabetic issues and chest pains. In 2023, there was nearly a seven percent (7%) increase in the number of health-related calls OCFA responded to related to health issues.         City Council 22 – 325 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 5 4 2 7 9 In addition, City staff continue to monitor Code Enforcement Division activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance pertaining to these facilities. Code Enforcement staff will broaden data reports that show enforcement activity beyond the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the Moratorium, 17 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The amount of active open industrial cases, in close proximity to one another, during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance and harming the public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods. Since the adoption of the Moratorium, City staff have received multiple code enforcement complaints from community members about industrial businesses in the TZC area that were also reported previously before the adoption of the Moratorium. City staff have received repeated code enforcement and air emission complaints about facilities in the Logan neighborhood and are working with Code Enforcement Division and SCAQMD staff to obtain responses, investigations, or reports provided by the Code Enforcement Division and SCAQMD to the complaints reported. Recent code enforcement complaints on properties in the Logan neighborhood involve complaints for recurring unpermitted work and land use violations that involve large commercial vehicles blocking street access and impacting nearby residents. Code Enforcement Division follow-up has resulted in larger administrative citations, continued enforcement, and onsite meetings with business owners. Moreover, air emission complaints have been reported to SCAQMD. These complaints include one involving black smoke and another regarding unpermitted soil vapor extraction equipment onsite. Part of the jurisdictions that City staff are working with include SCAQMD staff to obtain updates regarding the status of these complaints. SCAQMD staff investigated one complaint that did not result in an enforcement action and is investigating the other complaint. SCAQMD staff has clarified that for air quality complaints they receive, their inspector is required to be physically present to observe the activity from the facility described in the complaint to determine if the complaint warrants further investigation or enforcement action in accordance with South Coast AQMD Rules 401 (Visible Emissions), 402 (Public Nuisance), and 403 (Fugitive Dust). Community members continue to share concerns with City and SCAQMD staff regarding the turnaround time for an SCAQMD inspector to be physically present at an SCAQMD-permitted facility to investigate an air quality complaint, especially if a complaint is reported after working hours or on weekends.         City Council 22 – 326 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 6 4 2 7 9 Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies To broaden the analysis beyond the City's local land use impacts, City staff have initiated public records requests from outside regulatory agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and others responsible for issuing supportive permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Such agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities, and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities and received current data requests for sites located within SD No. 84 that were initiated by City staff on April 25, 2024. Data from outside regulatory agencies will assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In response to the City’s request, SCAQMD clarified the need to process the records request by larger geographic areas, such as zip code area as an example, not specifically matching the boundaries of the TZC. The City has not received responses to its Public Records Act requests and once it does, additional time will be needed for City staff to carefully review and analyze the data in order to understand all activities (internal and external) and affected industrial businesses. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update and Neighborhood Engagement City staff continue to work with Project Consultant MIG to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent. In order to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code will likely be required. MIG and City staff have already conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts continue to indicate that there are irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area which are among the most pressing topics to be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. The Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section of the Planning Division continue to coordinate with City departments, outside regulatory agencies, and staff from other federal and state agencies to identify additional resources available to enhance deeper awareness of pollution exposure in disadvantaged communities, long-term health effects, and options for immediate         City Council 22 – 327 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 7 4 2 7 9 solutions. The NIES team has held meetings and discussions with staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and CalEPA Environmental Justice Team to identify opportunities for linking environmental justice (EJ) resources and support to the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. NIES staff also continue to coordinate with residents selected to represent the City’s EJ Clusters to complete the formation of the EJ Action Committee, the community-led EJ advocacy group. This group will help guide the prioritization and resource investments to implement the City’s General Plan EJ Policies and Implementation Actions. Next Steps During the Moratorium, staff will evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would permanently address industrial land uses in the TZC. Staff continues to receive, analyze, and prepare a thorough evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC. Staff has determined that an extension of the Moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), is recommended to provide the additional staff time and resources needed to implement a comprehensive evaluation of the industrial uses in the TZC utilizing the data reporting and tracking, regulatory research, enforcement reports, and department discussions to fully understand the effects of industrial uses in the TZC and to continue to address current and immediate threats to public health, safety, and welfare, due to growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts within the TZC. On May 7, 2024, a ten-day report was issued by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) and is attached and referenced as Exhibit A to the Ordinance attached to this staff report. The April 16, 2024 City Council Meeting staff report is included in this report as Exhibit 3, providing background on the issues and analysis on the original need for the Moratorium. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The extension of the Moratorium is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval,         City Council 22 – 328 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 8 4 2 7 9 commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of uses in Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Uncodified Urgency Ordinance Extending Moratorium for Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days 2. Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3036 adopted on April 16, 2024 3. April 16, 2024 City Council Staff Report and Exhibits 4. Public Notice Submitted By: Minh Thai, Planning and Building Agency Executive Director Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager         City Council 22 – 329 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 1 of 11 UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) MONTHS AND FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has the police power pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, to make and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urgency ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a Moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (“SD-84”) also known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”) by adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3063 to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods in the TZC (SD-84) through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, proximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness; and WHEREAS, the Moratorium will expire on June 1, 2024 unless extended; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council, after notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, to adopt an ordinance extending the Moratorium for 10 months and 15 days, upon approval by a fourth-fifths vote, and upon making the same findings required for the adoption of the initial forty-five (45) day Moratorium; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858(d) requires the City Council, ten days prior to the expiration of the Moratorium or any extension thereof, to issue a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Moratorium; and         City Council 22 – 330 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 2 of 11 WHEREAS, on May 7, 2024, City staff prepared, and the City Council issued and filed a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the Moratorium; and WHEREAS, Santa Ana Charter Sections 415 and 417 expressly authorize the City Council to enact urgency ordinances, which take effect immediately upon introduction, for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858, authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance with a four-fifths vote, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, in unanimously adopting the Moratorium on April 16, 2024, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana established the following findings, all of which below remain true and applicable and necessary to support extending the Moratorium: •The TZC, located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010; and •Upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; an d •The goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new and enhancement of existing communities through transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and         City Council 22 – 331 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 3 of 11 •Industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and •The TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were converted to the mixed-use zones allowed by the TZC; and •Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called “disadvantaged communities”, in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their gene ral plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and •The City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and •The Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana’s General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and •As required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all of its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and •Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP -1.9 (Avoid Conflict         City Council 22 – 332 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 4 of 11 of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and •The industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and •The Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican - American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century; and •The construction of Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in a number of families being displa ced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and •In the 1970s a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and •The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and •Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and •The updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban         City Council 22 – 333 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 5 of 11 Neighborhood land use designations—both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and •There are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and •In the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and •In the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities         City Council 22 – 334 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 6 of 11 have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and •There is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very-low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and •There is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor’s yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and •The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofan o, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and •MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the         City Council 22 – 335 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 7 of 11 comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area; and •The policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and •Given these concerns, the City Council directed that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district; and •Based on the foregoing, the City Council found that continuing to issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property located in the TZC for the purposes of industrial business use, prior to the City’s completion of its study of the potential impact of such uses, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements in the TZC area is thus necessary; and •The City Council further found that if an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: o Adversely impacts surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; o Adversely impacts sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; o Conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; o Long-term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses; and o Risks to the public health, safety and welfare of the City; and •The City Council also determined that prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare required the immediate enactment of the urgency         City Council 22 – 336 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 8 of 11 ordinance and that the absence of the urgency ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which ma y be adopted by the City; industrial business uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated updates and revisions to the Code. Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and implementation would create impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the City Council, in adopting the ordinance, found to be unacceptable; and WHEREAS, Since the adoption of the Moratorium, City staff has begun to gather data and research the impact of these industrial uses in the TZC as set forth in the report issued by the City Council on May 7, 2204; and WHEREAS, there is a need to study further the issues associated with industrial uses in the TZC and the impact that these uses have on the adjacent residential neighborhoods and their residents; and WHEREAS, City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council each require a reasonable period of time to study the existing SD-84/TZC and to evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to extend the Moratorium for a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, or until the City Council adopts an ordinance addressing the issues raised, whichever occurs first; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 21, 2024, the City Council heard testimonial evidence and all other evidence submitted from members of the public that were present and from City staff. The City Council reviewed, analyzed, considered and studied all oral and written testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing, including staff reports and presentations of City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to public health, safety and welfare posed by industrial uses in SD-84, also known as, the TZC. If an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare due to adverse impacts on surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; adverse impacts on sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; conflicts with the goals and policies of the City’s General         City Council 22 – 337 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 9 of 11 Plan; and the effect of long term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses. Section 3. In accordance with Government Code Section 65858 (d), on May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a written report describing the measures being taken to alleviate the conditions that lead to the adoption of the Moratorium and this extension thereof, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim Urgency Ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health and welfare, prohibiting any uses that m ay be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission of the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Section 5. Government Code Section 65858(a) provides that the City Council, after notice and a public hearing, may extend the interim Ordinance for 10 months and 15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any extension requires a four-fifths vote. Section 6. The City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858 and Santa Ana Charter Sections 415 and 417 hereby adopts this uncodified Urgency Ordinance extending the Moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC for a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, commencing June 1, 2024. The Moratorium will now expire on April 15, 2025, or until the City Council adopts an Ordinance addressing the issues related to the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of industrial uses within SD-84, also known as the TZC. For the purposes of this Urgency Ordinance, “industrial uses” includes those specified by Divisions 18 and 19 of Article III of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and by Section 41-2007 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and Table 2A in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84). Section 7. This Ordinance shall have no further force and effect after a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, commencing June 1, 2024; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this Ordinance for a period of one more year. Section 8. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be punished as provided in Section 1 -8 of Chapter 1 of the Code. Section 9. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15061(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a         City Council 22 – 338 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 10 of 11 direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of uses in the zoning district. Section 10. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 11. This Ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The C ity Council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1 of this Ordinance. Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED this ___ day of ___________________, 2024. _______________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By:_____________________________ Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney         City Council 22 – 339 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 11 of 11 AYES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _______________________, 2024. Date: ________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk City of Santa Ana         City Council 22 – 340 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 15 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report May 7, 2024 TOPIC: Ten-Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 AGENDA TITLE Ten-Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, a 45-day Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 RECOMMENDED ACTION Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, the purpose of this staff report is to provide a written report no less than ten days prior to the expiration of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 describing the measures City staff has taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Ordinance. On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, which establishes a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in Specific Development No. 84, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (commonly referred to as the “Transit Zoning Code” or “TZC”) while City staff researches appropriate regulations and determines whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 shall have no further force and effect 45 days from the date of its adoption, unless, after a report on the first 45 days and a public hearing, the City Council members, again by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend the Ordinance Exhibit A         City Council 22 – 341 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 2 4 2 4 4 for an initial extension period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days. Based on the adoption date of April 16, 2024, the Ordinance is scheduled to expire on June 1, 2024. As City staff begins to analyze and prepare an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC, the evaluation will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would address industrial land uses in the TZC. DISCUSSION Background On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent neighborhoods through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, proximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness. During the urgency interim moratorium period, the City will not issue permits that result in the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC. Measures Taken Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the 45-day moratorium, staff conducted an interagency meeting, which included representatives from multiple City departments. These departments include the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Moreover, engagement with additional agencies such as the Police Department, Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities are intertwined with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that the application of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 affects up to 130 industrial businesses in the TZC. Of these, over one-dozen have active applications for permits, the majority of which are to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties and address ongoing Code Enforcement Division notices of violation.         City Council 22 – 342 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 3 4 2 4 4 City staff continues to gather, review, and analyze information regarding affected industrial businesses within the TZC. Specific data and reporting pertains to applications submitted by industrial businesses for permits, entitlements, certificates of occupancy, business licenses, and other relevant records immediately prior to and following the adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance and currently being reviewed by City staff. Requests for information on calls for service and incident activities responded to by public safety departments of the Santa Ana Police Department and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) are being reviewed by City staff to understand and validate public safety concerns or impacts shared by neighbors in disadvantaged communities with actual calls and emergencies reported. In addition, City staff continues to monitor Code Enforcement Division activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance pertaining to these facilities. Code Enforcement staff will broaden data reports that show enforcement activity beyond the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance on April 16, 2024, 17 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby. Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies To broaden the analysis beyond the City's local land use impacts, City staff have initiated public records requests of violation records and violation status of outside regulatory agencies, and have contacted staff from external regulatory agencies such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), Santa Ana Regional Quality Water Control Board, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and others responsible for issuing supportive permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Specifically, these agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities, and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities and have received current data requests for sites located within SD No. 84. Data from external regulatory agencies would assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In         City Council 22 – 343 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 4 4 2 4 4 response to the City’s request, SCAQMD clarified the need to process the records request by larger geographic areas, not specifically matching the boundaries of the TZC. When reports become available to the City, additional time will be needed for City staff to carefully review and analyze other internal data to understand all activities (internal and external) and affected industrial businesses. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update and Neighborhood Engagement City staff continues to work with Project Consultant Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent and, to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required. MIG and City staff have already conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. City staff from the Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section of the Planning Division will continue to coordinate with City departments, external regulatory agencies, and staff from other federal and state agencies to identify additional resources available to enhance deeper awareness of pollution exposure in disadvantaged communities, long-term health effects, and immediate solutions. The NIES team has held meetings and discussions with staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and CalEPA Environmental Justice Team to identify opportunities for linking environmental justice (EJ) resources and support to the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In addition, the NIES team has been working with the residents selected to represent the City’s EJ Clusters to complete the formation of the EJ Action Committee, the community-led EJ advocacy group, to guide the prioritization and resource investments to implement the City’s General Plan EJ Policies and Implementation Actions. Next Steps Staff implements the 45-day moratorium established by Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 through ongoing interagency coordination. Moreover, staff will continue to analyze and prepare an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC, which will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether an extension of the 45-day moratorium is recommended. If an extension is recommended, it would be placed on the May 21, 2024 City Council agenda as a public hearing item, which is prior to the June 1 expiration date.         City Council 22 – 344 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 5 4 2 4 4 During the 45-day moratorium and any potential extension period, staff will evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would permanently address industrial land uses in the TZC. Meeting Date Display FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 2. April 16, 2024 City Council Staff Report Submitted By: Minh Thai, Planning and Building Agency Executive Director Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager         City Council 22 – 345 4/1/2025 ORDINANCE NO. NS-3063 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has the police power pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, to make and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urgency ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a four -fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and WHEREAS, Specific Development No. 84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010; and WHEREAS, upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed -use residential and commercial communities; and WHEREAS, the goals of the TZC are to provide a transit -supportive, pedestrian - oriented development framework to support the addition of new and enhancement of existing communities through transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and WHEREAS, industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 1 gth century, predating modern Ordinance No. INS - 3063 Page 1 of 8        City Council 22 – 346 4/1/2025 zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and WHEREAS, the TZC provides new mixed -use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were converted to the mixed - use zones allowed by the TZC; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called "disadvantaged communities', in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision -making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health -inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and WHEREAS, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana's General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and WHEREAS, as required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all of its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and WHEREAS, numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and WHEREAS, the industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 2 of 8        City Council 22 – 347 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, the Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican - American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century and WHEREAS, the construction of Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in a number of families being displaced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, in the 1970s a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as "disadvantaged communities" by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and WHEREAS, the updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations —both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and WHEREAS, there are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City's Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC's existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and WHEREAS, in the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Ordinance No. INS - 3063 Page 3 of 8        City Council 22 – 348 4/1/2025 Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency — Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, in the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency — Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, there is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed -use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very -low income households, which is located less than one -fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, there is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor's yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, The City Council approved a contract with Moore, lacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City's Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 4 of 8        City Council 22 – 349 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning -related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area; and WHEREAS, the policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and WHEREAS, given these concerns, the City Council hereby directs that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district; and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that continuing to issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property located in the TZC for the purposes of industrial business use, prior to the City's completion of its study of the potential impact of such uses, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements in the TZC area is thus necessary; and WHEREAS, if an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: 1) Adversely impacts surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; 2) Adversely impacts sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; 3) Conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; 4) Long-term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses; and 5) Risks to the public health, safety and welfare of the City; and WHEREAS, prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare requires the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance. The absence of this urgency ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which may be adopted by the City; industrial business uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated updates and revisions to the Code. Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and implementation would create Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 5 of 8        City Council 22 – 350 4/1/2025 impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the City Council, in adopting this ordinance, has found to be unacceptable; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds, determines and declares that the current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of the city and its citizens necessitates the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance by a four -fifths vote of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15061(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of uses in the zoning district. Section 3. California Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Section 4. The City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858, hereby adopts this urgency ordinance establishing a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC while City staff researches appropriate regulations and whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. For the purposes of this Ordinance, "industrial uses" includes those specified by Divisions 18 and 19 of Article III of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and by Section 41-2007 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and Table 2A in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84). Section 5. This ordinance shall have no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from the date of its adoption; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days and subsequently, after public hearing, the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance one more year. Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 6 of 8        City Council 22 – 351 4/1/2025 Section 6. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of Chapter 1 of the Code. Section 7. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 8. This ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED this 16t' day of April, 2024, APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: CJ WAQ-y N - Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers Amezcua, Bacerra, Hernande Lopez Penaloza Phan. Vazquez (7) NOES: Councilmembers None (0) ABSTAIN: Councilmembers None (0) NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers None (0) Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 7 of 8        City Council 22 – 352 4/1/2025 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, JENNIFER L. HALL, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-3063 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on April 16, 2024. Date: 4 k acat-\- akCity Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 8 of 8        City Council 22 – 353 4/1/2025 28.Urgency Interim Ordinance Pursuant to Section 65858(a) of the California Government Code Adopting a 45-day Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (A copy of the full text of the proposed urgency ordinance is available for review in the City Clerk’s Office) Department(s): Recommended Action: 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), adopting a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 zoning district. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project.         City Council 22 – 354 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 28 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 16, 2024 TOPIC: Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) AGENDA TITLE Urgency Interim Ordinance Pursuant to Section 65858(a) of the California Government Code Adopting a 45-day Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), adopting a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 zoning district. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff is recommending adoption of an urgency interim ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), also known as a moratorium, to address current and immediate threats to public health, safety, and welfare, due to growing code         City Council 22 – 355 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 2 4 1 8 7 enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts within the Specific Development No. 84 zoning district (commonly referred to as the “Transit Zoning Code” or “TZC”). Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, and surrounding areas, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is straining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods. If adopted, the urgency ordinance would establish a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC while City staff researches appropriate regulations and determines whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. The urgency ordinance shall have no further force and effect 45-days from the date of its adoption, unless, after a report on the first 45 days and a public hearing, the City Council members, again by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial extension period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days. DISCUSSION Background Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code) The Specific Development No. 84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”), is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The TZC includes the Civic Center, Downtown, and the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and in established residential communities. As shown in Exhibit 2, the TZC is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. Prior to the implementation of the TZC, the area consisted of a wide range of civic, commercial, industrial, and residential land uses under a variegated amalgamation of zoning districts and their regulations. In June 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2804, adopting various entitlements approving the creation of the TZC. The TZC established a transit- supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and         City Council 22 – 356 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 3 4 1 8 7 design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. Moreover, the TZC provided new zoning for all of the properties contained within its boundary with the exception of those properties zoned Light Industrial (M1) or Heavy Industrial (M2). These M1 and M2 properties retained their existing zoning, but were covered by two overlay zones that allows for the option of future mixed-use development to be exercised at the discretion of the property owner. In support of the TZC, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. In these industrial overlay areas, however, the resulting new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts between the new General Plan land use designations and the industrial overlays. Since 2010, and specifically in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, these industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, undergone expansions or intensifications, and created numerous land use conflicts and disturbances that affect surrounding residential communities. Specifically, in the Logan neighborhood alone, these land uses create quality of life, health and safety, and other trespass issues for residential properties that often directly abut these industrial land uses. These issues include odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts that have taken place for nearly a decade and a half, despite the change in underlying General Plan land use designation. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required. Necessary amendments include the creation of new zoning district designations and corresponding development standards; updates to the definitions, signage, nonconforming, and parking sections; reorganization of the entire Zoning Code to a more user-friendly format; and new standards to reflect new land use trends, economic development trends, and land use goals of the City. MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area.         City Council 22 – 357 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 4 4 1 8 7 Historically Disadvantaged Communities Prior to the adoption of the City’s Transit Zoning Code (TZC), the City permitted industrial uses within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools. By way of context, the Logan neighborhood represents the oldest Mexican and Mexican-American neighborhoods of Santa Ana and one of the oldest barrios in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century. Moreover, as a neighborhood, the area was established before the modern practice of separating impactful land uses, also known as zoning. The Logan neighborhood itself originated as early as 1886 and was largely settled by 1900, before the practice of zoning was enshrined by Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926. By then, the neighborhood comprised residential, industrial, commercial, and related land uses, with issues further exacerbated by rail lines, fuel storage depots, and the construction of the Santa Ana Freeway between 1947 and 1956. Comprehensive data analysis and mapping tools generated by the California EPA (CalEPA), the Center for Diseases Control/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), the U.S. EPA (EPA), and California Healthy Places Index (HPI), present concerning information regarding environmental conditions impacting residents in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Exhibit 3 of this report references EJ maps showing rankings of at least 90% or higher in heavy air pollution attributed to indicators describing exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Diesel Particulate Matter, Air Toxics Cancer Risk, Toxic Releases to Air, and Hazardous Water Proximity exposures. Multiple sources of environmental exposure and pollution burden into communities of color, including the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, presents an alarming set of challenges and decline in healthy community conditions that will impact their quality of life and life expectancy with continued heavy industrial uses nearby. Implementation of Senate Bill (SB 1000), City General Plan Update (GPU), and new Environmental Justice (EJ) Policies and Actions SB 1000 went into effect in 2016, requiring local governments to address pollution and other hazards that disproportionately impact low-income and communities of color within their jurisdiction as a way to proactively plan for and address environmental concerns when developing and updating components of the General Plan. During this period, the City began and extended its comprehensive public engagement process for the General Plan Update through its adoption in April 2022. The City and community worked to ensure that the new General Plan included SB 1000 requirements of addressing environmental justice in local general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing         City Council 22 – 358 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 5 4 1 8 7 harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options. Of note, the new General Plan mixed-use land use designations in the TZC area were largely left intact, including those in the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods, when the General Plan Update was adopted in 2022. Santa Ana’s current General Plan champions implementation policies, including 77 EJ actions that address air quality, noxious uses, water safety, residential lead exposure in the soil, and other environmental public health conditions. City staff, over the past year, have worked on a process to create an EJ Action Committee of EJ cluster area residents, community-based organizations (CBOs), and County and City staff representatives, to guide implementation and resource investments to protect neighborhoods from experiencing any further environmental harm. For the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, incompatible land uses allowed from past zoning decisions, including the industrial overlay zones, have perpetuated the practices of locating industrial uses or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color. Code Enforcement and Immediate Ongoing Issues In the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, the Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. These violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby. Since June 2023, the TZC communities have experienced a marked increase in impacts stemming from the irreconcilable industrial and residential land use conflicts in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Residents in the TZC have increased their reporting of complaints and public health concerns to City staff regarding emitted contaminants and zoning violations from industrial businesses in the neighborhoods. Concerns that range from air pollution and smoke, toxic release exposures, idling trucks on residential streets, lead exposure, illegal storage, unpermitted uses, loud noise at night, and other property maintenance pose an immediate public health threat that is straining public resources to continuously investigate and address these matters. Six months ago, a fire incident at Macera Crematory, located at 1020 Fuller Street, alarmed neighbors at 9:18 p.m. on August 29, 2023. Neighbors shared with City officials disturbing video of high flames escaping the stack on the rooftop, the screeching noise that went nonstop for 10 minutes, and what they described as a foul odor attributed to the fire. As City staff         City Council 22 – 359 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 6 4 1 8 7 followed up with external regulatory agencies issuing permits to operate this facility, and quickly, staff observed the limitations from regulatory agencies and their compartmentalized processes to investigate and act on enforcement measures. Since 2022, the City has enhanced community services by restructuring its Planning Division to contain a Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section, which oversees, among other functions, environmental justice efforts in Santa Ana and regional coordination to address such issues. Despite this restructuring, it is now well documented that the NIES section’s coordination with external regulatory agencies has not resulted in a favorable outcome in enforcement by responsible external agencies such as South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Department of Consumer Affairs Cemetery and Funeral Bureau (CFB), and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) in many of these investigations. In response, the City has adopted new regulations such as a Noxious Uses Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS-3044, adopted June 20, 2023), which amends Zoning Ordinance No. 2023-01 that includes: a notification requirement to the City by the property owner to obtain a permit from a regulatory public agency; a requirement of a 1,000 linear foot distance buffer measured from the outermost boundary of the subject property; and a conditional use permit requirement from a regulatory public agency to handle, store, emit, or discharge particulate materials, exhaust emissions, or regulated compounds, or chemicals near a public park, school (K-12), or property zoned for residential purposes. City staff have also researched commercial real estate acquisition data and current for sale properties to identify any trends that could potentially generate an increase in the application of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance for proposed or expanded industrial uses. From September 2022 to date, seven properties, primarily industrial businesses, sold and three of those businesses (800-808 E. Washington Avenue, 1045 Fuller Street, and 923 N. Logan Street) are located in the Logan neighborhood. Currently, two large properties are in the market for multifamily and land types located in the TZC. Environmental Justice (EJ)/Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Profile: Logan and Lacy neighborhood impacts A demographic profile of the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods combined represent a population of 5,907, which encompass 1,564 households, a median household income of $56,864, average household size is nearly four persons, median age is 27 years, per- capita income is $23,495, and 74% comprise renter-occupied units based on demographic forecasts for 2023. Nearly 25% of the population is under 14 years of age and 14% are 55 years of age and older. Nearly 3% of the population attended up to 12th grade with no diploma, over 31% are high school graduates, and nearly 97% of the working population over 16 years of age are employed. This data illustrates that the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90% or         City Council 22 – 360 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 7 4 1 8 7 greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model. Failure to address ongoing irreconcilable land use conflicts that are the target of this moratorium will further exacerbate the ongoing demographic and environmental justice challenges that these two neighborhoods within the TZC have grappled with since their founding. General Plan Inconsistency with Present Land Uses Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The purpose of the interim ordinance is to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from these irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC, during the time that City staff analyzes and prepares an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC. Such an evaluation will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether industrial uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and, if not, proceed with an ordinance and zoning map amendment to the district. During the interim moratorium period, City staff will not issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property for the purposes of industrial business use in the TZC. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT This ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of uses in the zoning district. FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.         City Council 22 – 361 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 8 4 1 8 7 EXHIBITS 1. Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) 2. Transit Zoning Code (TZC) Map 3. Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps City General Plan Environmental Justice Implementation Actions 4. City General Plan Environmental Justice (EJ) Implementation Actions Submitted By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Planning Manager Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager         City Council 22 – 362 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 1 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has the police power pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, to make and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urgency ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a f our-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect forty -five (45) days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and WHEREAS, Specific Development No. 84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010 ; and WHEREAS, upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; and WHEREAS, the goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian- oriented development framework to support the addition of new and enhancement of existing communities through transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and WHEREAS, industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and         City Council 22 – 363 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 2 of 8 WHEREAS, the TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were converted to the mixed - use zones allowed by the TZC; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called “disadvantaged communities”, in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and WHEREAS, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana’s General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and WHEREAS, as required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all of its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities ; and WHEREAS, numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and WHEREAS, the industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and WHEREAS, the Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican - American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy         City Council 22 – 364 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 3 of 8 land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20 th century and WHEREAS, the construction of Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in a number of families being displaced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, in the 1970s a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and WHEREAS, the updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations —both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and WHEREAS, there are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and WHEREAS, in the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to         City Council 22 – 365 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 4 of 8 disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, in the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (autom otive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup s ites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, l inguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, there is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very-low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, there is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor’s yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and WHEREAS, MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in         City Council 22 – 366 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 5 of 8 Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area; and WHEREAS, the policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and WHEREAS, given these concerns, the City Council hereby directs that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district; and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that continuing to issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property located in the TZC for the purposes of industrial business use, prior to the City’s completion of its study of the potential impact of such uses, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements in the TZC area is thus necessary; and WHEREAS, if an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: (1)Adversely impacts surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; (2)Adversely impacts sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; (3)Conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; (4)Long-term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses; and (5)Risks to the public health, safety and welfare of the City; and WHEREAS, prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare requires the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance. The absence of this urgency ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which may be adopted by the City; industrial business uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated u pdates and revisions to the Code. Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and implementation would create impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the City Council, in adopting this ordinance, has found to be unacceptable; and         City Council 22 – 367 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 6 of 8 WHEREAS, the City Council finds, determines and declares that the current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of the city and its citizens necessitates the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance by a four-fifths vote of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15061(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of uses in the zoning district. Section 3. California Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Section 4. The City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858, hereby adopts this urgency ordinance establishing a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC while City staff researches appropriate regulations and whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. For the purposes of this Ordinance, “industrial uses” includes those specified by Divisions 18 and 19 of Article III of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and by Section 41-2007 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and Table 2A in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84). Section 5. This ordinance shall have no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from the date of its adoption; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days and subsequently, after public hearing, the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance one more year. Section 6. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of Chapter 1 of the Code.         City Council 22 – 368 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 7 of 8 Section 7. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 8. This ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED this ___ day of ___________________, 2024. _______________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By:_____________________________ Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: ________________________________________         City Council 22 – 369 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 8 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _______________________, 2024. Date: ________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk City of Santa Ana         City Council 22 – 370 4/1/2025 HHH WASHINGTON AV WASHINGTON AV WASHINGTON AV FLOWER STFLOWER STCIVIC CENTER DR CIVIC CENTER DR CIVIC CENTER DR CIVIC CENTER DR1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH STGARNSEY STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STBROADWAYBROADWAYBROADWAYBROADWAYPARTON STPARTON STSANTA ANA BLVD SANTA ANA BLVD SANTA ANA BLVDSANTAANAB LV D ROSS STROSS STROSS STROSS STHALLADAY STHICKORY ST FRUIT ST GRAND AVGRAND AVGRAND AVSTANDARD AVORANGE AVCYPRESS AV 6TH STDURANT STSYCAMORE STGRAND AV6TH ST BIRCH STSYCAMORE STSYCAMORE STSYCAMORE STFRENCH STFRENCH STBUSH STBUSH STBUSHSTBUSH STSPURGEONSTFRENCH STMORTIMERSTFLOWERSTFLOWER STLINCOLN AV6TH ST 10TH ST WELLINGTON AV HATHAWAY ST STAFFORD ST BIRCH ST14TH ST VAN NESS AVP ENN W Y 3RD ST 3RD ST 3RD ST 3RD ST 3RD ST 3RD STSPURGEON STSPURGEON ST10TH ST PORTER STHALESWORTH ST LACY ST5TH ST 5TH ST 5TH ST SANTA ANA B L V D LIME ST WASHINGTON AV 14TH ST 6TH ST SANTA FE STVANCE STBROWN ST L A C Y S T HATHAWAY STG A R F I E L D S T GARFIELD STMIN T E R S T MARTHALN STAFFORD ST 11TH ST 12TH ST LOGAN ST10TH ST GARFIELD STLACY ST14TH ST 8TH ST 9TH ST MINTER STPOINSETTIA ST10TH ST 2ND ST FRUIT STEASTWOOD AVBREEDEN STPARTON ST14THST 2ND ST 3RD ST PO IN S E T T I A S T PO I N S E T T I A S T SANTA FE STRIVERINE AVFULLER STL A C Y S T 5TH ST CUSTER ST2ND ST S AN T I A GO S T TERMINAL STSPURGEON STEASTWOOD AVTERMINAL STBIRCH STSANTIAGO ST0 550 1,100 1,650 2,200 2,750275 Feet / Transit Zoning Code SD-84 District Boundary Corridor (CDR) Downtown (DT) Government Center (GC) Open Space (OS) Transit Village (TV) Urban Center (UC) Urban Neighborhood (UN-1) Urban Neighborhood (UN-2) Industrial Overlay M-1 (OZ) Industrial Overlay M-2 (OZ) SD-84         City Council 22 – 371 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps         City Council 22 – 372 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The Community Summary infographic data are from ESRI 2023 forecasts, U.S. Census Bureau, and prior year American Community Survey results. Data references population, race and ethnicity, income, age, employment, homeownership, and a population density greater than the City’s population density of 12,471.5 people per square mile.         City Council 22 – 373 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 provides an insight into vulnerable communities that are most affected by pollution burdens, with special consideration on race and ethnicity. The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana at 90% or above as being burdened by pollution.         City Council 22 – 374 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) within the City of Santa Ana, with both Logan and Lacy neighborhoods falling into that category. The CalEPA has responsibility for identifying those communities and CalEPA’s designation of disadvantaged communities must be based on “geographic, socioeconomic, public health, and environmental hazard” criteria. CalEPA DACs affect an entire or a portion of thirty-three of Santa Ana’s neighborhoods.         City Council 22 – 375 4/1/2025 The Center for Diseases Control (CDC) Environmental Justice Index Map uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau, and other federal agencies to rank the cumulative impacts of environmental injustices on health for every census tract. The map below shows the census tract that includes part of the Lacy neighborhood, which appears to rank HIGH in air pollution due to exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Diesel Particulate Matter from idling trucks, and Air Toxics Cancer Risk indicators.         City Council 22 – 376 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below shows the census tract that includes the Logan neighborhood, which appears to rank HIGH in air pollution related to exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Diesel Particulate Matter from idling trucks, and Air Toxics Cancer Risk indicators.         City Council 22 – 377 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The EPA’s Environmental Justice map and screening tool uses national consistent data combining environmental and demographic indicators in maps and reports. The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Air Toxics Cancer Risk, reflecting at 90% or higher.         City Council 22 – 378 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Diesel Particulate Matter indicating percentiles above 90%.         City Council 22 – 379 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Hazardous Water Proximity, showing a percentile of 95% or above.         City Council 22 – 380 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 reflecting a heavy burden of 95% and above in the percentile score.         City Council 22 – 381 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana’s ranking as it relates to Lead Paint showing that the percentile is within 80% and 90%.         City Council 22 – 382 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below indicates the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Toxic Releases to Air showing a high percentile score of 90%.         City Council 22 – 383 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The Healthy Places Index (HPI) comprises a data and policy platform to advance equitable community investments, develop critical programs and policies and advance health equity through open and accessible data. The map below captures the City of Santa Ana, which indicates that the majority of the City of Santa Ana’s neighborhoods rank on the LOW scale of the healthy community conditions, as seen in the dark blue and light blue layers.         City Council 22 – 384 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) Using the HPI mapping tool, the Lacy neighborhood ranks at a 9.6% of the least healthy community conditions. Using the HPI mapping tool, the Logan neighborhood ranks on the LOW end, showing nearly 11% of the least healthy community conditions.         City Council 22 – 385 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Community 1.1 Yes Engage EJ communities on recreation and cultural programs. Incorporate community stakeholders from environmental justice communities to form an Environmental Justice Action Committee to guide the identification of recreational and cultural programing needs and desires. PRCSA / PBA 2023 Community 1.2 Yes Community conversation. Plan for and conduct a community survey every two years related to community health, pollution concerns, parks, community engagement, and community service needs, with focused outreach to environmental justice priority areas utilizing various platforms, such as social media and school events, to encourage substantial survey participation. CMO Every two years Community 1.3 Yes Collaboration. Develop intentional, strategic partnerships with public, private, and nonprofit entities to improve health outcomes by leveraging capacity, resources, and programs around mutually beneficial initiatives that promote health, equity, and sustainability in neighborhoods within environmental justice area boundaries. Develop a comprehensive partnership policy providing guidelines that can be used throughout the City organization. PBA/PRCSA 2022 -2024 Community 1.4 Yes Community coordination on underutilized spaces. Coordinate with community residents, property owners, and other stakeholders to identify vacant and potentially underutilized properties and strategize how such properties could be repurposed into public parks or commercial recreation facilities. PBA/PRCSA 2022 & ongoing Community 1.5 Yes Alternative facilities. In park deficient and environmental justice areas, identify facilities that are viable alternatives to public parks and municipal facilities for recreational, cultural, and health and wellness programs, including but not limited to school facilities, facilities of faith-based and civic organizations, and privately owned recreation and entertainment facilities. Identify, inventory, and rank other resources for potential park system acquisition, expansion to existing parks, and/or parks development opportunity within the community. PRCSA 2022 Community 1.6 Yes Program accessibility. To ensure residents of environmental justice area boundaries have access to recreational, cultural, and health and wellness programs, establish accessibility corridors that provide attractive, comfortable, and safe pedestrian and bike access to public recreational facilities in the Parks Master Plan (an implementation action of the Open Space Element). Identify public realm improvements needed to create these accessibility corridors. Prioritize investments for accessibility corridors in the city's capital investment program; include investments for accessibility corridors when investments are made in new parks and recreation facilities within environmental justice area boundaries. PRCSA/PWA 2022 Page 1 of 11        City Council 22 – 386 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Community 1.7 Yes Rental property outreach. Augment the Proactive Rental Enforcement Team and Residential Response Team with additional outreach geared toward absentee owners of rental properties. Create and periodically distribute outreach materials in order to educate absentee owners about legal obligations to maintain and upkeep rental properties. Distribute information to tenants about their rights and protection, so they are not penalized for reporting or living in a dwelling unit that does not meet health and safety standards. Translate outreach efforts into Spanish, Vietnamese, and other appropriate languages. Prioritize such outreach for properties within environmental justice area boundaries. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Community 1.8 Yes Neighborhood rehabilitation. Continue to seek state and federal funding for neighborhood rehabilitation projects and collaborate with community-based organizations to identify housing issues and improvements needed, especially for housing within environmental justice area boundaries.CDA Ongoing Community 2.1 Yes Facilities to support lifelong learning. For areas within park deficient and environmental justice areas , conduct, maintain, and publicize an inventory of public, nongovernmental, and private facilities that can be used by organizations to support early childhood education, after school activities, libraries and learning centers, and other meetings and educational opportunities. CMO 2024 Community 2.2 Yes Public realm. Identify areas in need of a public realm plan to provide attractive, comfortable, and safe walking corridors to promote accessibility to community programs or activity centers, in conjunction with the City's Active Transportation Plan. PWA/PBA Ongoing Community 3.1 Yes Community health care facilities. Evaluate options to support existing and potential community health care facilities in environmental justice focus areas through a variety of mechanisms such as reduced permit fees, reduced impact fees, and tax incentives. PBA/CMO 2023 Community 3.2 Yes Pedestrian access to health facilities. Ensure that new or redeveloped health care facilities include pedestrian-friendly site amenities. In areas where mobile clinics are stationed, ensure the location is safe and accessible for pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users. PBA Ongoing Community 3.3 Yes Health metrics. Engage with the Orange County Health Care Agency and other stakeholders to monitor key health indicators to measure the success of the outcome of General Plan policies and the implementation plan, including reduction in incidence in asthma and low birth weight of infants. PBA/CMO 2022 Page 2 of 11        City Council 22 – 387 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Community 3.4 Yes Prevention activities. Coordinate with the County Health Care Agency to identify the root causes of health disparities and inequities in Santa Ana, with additional detail for residents living within environmental justice area boundaries. Identify potential programmatic changes and resources to better address the root causes. PBA/CMO 2022 - 2024 Community 3.5 Yes Environmental education. Encourage all education institutions in Santa Ana to include curriculum regarding environmental justice and local efforts to promote clean business operations, environmental quality, and the health in our community. PBA/CMO 2022 - 2024 Community 3.6 Yes Fresh and healthy foods. Pursue programs, incentives, and/or grants to encourage urban agriculture and small grocery or convenience stores to sell fresh foods in the city, especially those within environmental justice area boundaries. Examples include grants or loans to purchase updated equipment, publicity, or directories of healthy food outlets, or connecting stores to wholesale sources of healthy, local, or organic food. CDA 2022 Community 3.6A Yes Food Deserts. Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) to gather and map food desert data, and share publicly through the City's Environmental Quality webpage.PBA 2024 Community 3.7 Yes Public health and wellness collaboration summit. Collaborate with health care providers, health and wellness advocates, and other public health stakeholders to identify ways to improve the provision of and access to health and wellness services throughout the city. Include a discussion on areas within environmental justice area boundaries and other areas underserved by parks, programs and services that support health and wellness. PRCSA 2022 & ongoing Community 3.8 Yes Environmental soil and human health screening measures. Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency, and local stakeholders such as Orange County Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health, in efforts to provide increased healthcare services (i.e., blood lead testing, treatment) for residents, especially those that reside in environmental justice communities. Additionally, collaborate to advocate for adjustment of the County and State policies for health and environmental screening levels to promote healthy outcomes related to lead contamination as recommended by health experts. PBA Ongoing Community 3.9 Yes Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full-time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to implement the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. CMO 2022 Page 3 of 11        City Council 22 – 388 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Conservation 1.1 Yes Air quality planning. Review existing and monitor the development of new air monitoring and emissions reduction plans prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Gather and evaluate measures and strategies in such plans for their applicability to and feasibility for Santa Ana.PBA 2022 & annually Conservation 1.2 Yes Community identification. Coordinate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and local stakeholders to pursue a priority community designation for eligible environmental justice areas of the city , with focus on areas with unique needs and highest pollution burden as identified in the CalEnviroScreen tool. If such designation is not awarded, seek grant funds for activities such as local air quality monitoring. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.3 Yes Proactive engagement. Collaborate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and local stakeholders in environmental justice areas experiencing local air pollutions issues to outline objectives and strategies for monitoring air pollution in advance of the establishment of a community emissions reduction and/or air monitoring plan. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.4 Yes Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. PBA 2022 - 2027 Conservation 1.5 Yes Agency permits. Monitor the South Coast Air Quality Management District permitting and inspection process and the Orange County Health Care Agency to identify businesses in Santa Ana with potential hazardous materials or by-products, with a special focus on environmental justice communities. Serve as a liaison for residents to identify potential emission violations. Share information and data with the community on the City’s Environmental Quality web page. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.6 Yes Emissions monitoring. Coordinate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to monitor existing air measurements and recommend new air measurements and locations.PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.7 Yes Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas PBA/PD 2022 - 2024 Conservation 1.8 Yes Improve older trucks. Promote the City’s Vehicle Replacement Plan and explore the replacement of older trucks through City participation in regional incentive programs and education of Santa Ana private fleet owners of program opportunities. PWA 2022 Page 4 of 11        City Council 22 – 389 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Conservation 1.9 Yes Indirect source rules. Support the development of indirect source rules, drayage truck rules, advanced clean truck routes, and heavy-duty low NOx rules by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. CMO Ongoing Conservation 1.10 Yes Interagency team. Establish an environmental quality interagency team to evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas. Publish results and information on the City’s website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality web page. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.11 Yes Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. PBA/PWA Ongoing Conservation 1.12 Yes Data collection for emissions plans. Coordinate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to explore ways to initiate data collection efforts for a community emissions reduction and/or community air monitoring plan, including the identification of information needed (new or updated), potential data sources and needed resources, and strategies to engage residents and collect information. PBA 2022 Conservation 1.13 Yes Community survey on healthy lifestyles. Plan for and conduct a community survey of residents every two years related to community health, pollution, parks, community engagement, and community services, with focused outreach for environment justice concerns and priority areas (tie into other City efforts like Strategic Plan, park and recreation planning, community benefits, etc.).Report findings of survey through the various media platforms and utilize input to inform periodic evaluation and update of General Plan. CMO Every two years Conservation 1.14 Yes Expanded interactions. Identify opportunities to expand regular attendance and support neighborhood associations and community groups to hold regular meetings with City staff and decision-makers in neighborhoods within environmental justice communities, so that residents, community organizations and businesses can communicate their unique issues and needs, as well as their recommendations on how best to implement environmental quality, environmental health, and environmental justice policies. Arrange for language interpretation services as needed at these meetings so that all residents can participate. PBA/CMO Ongoing Conservation 1.15 Yes Expanded representation. Expand representation of residents from neighborhoods within environmental justice area boundaries by extending residents from such areas to become board, commission, and task force members as openings occur PBA/CMO Ongoing Page 5 of 11        City Council 22 – 390 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Conservation 1.16 Yes City budget. Evaluate the City’s budget and financial policies to include direction for prioritizing public services and improvements within environmental justice area boundaries. Augment budget meeting presentations to include a section dedicated to the status of actions and improvements to address the needs of residents within environmental justice area boundaries. CMO Annually Economic Prosperity 3.5 Yes Green business incentives. Continue to promote and market the Recycling Market Development Zone. Develop an incentive program to encourage nonpolluting industry and clean green technology companies that reduce environmental impacts and the carbon footprint to locate to the city. Encourage existing businesses to invest in technology and best practice to transition to sustainable business practices. CDA Ongoing Historical Preservation 3.8 Yes Equitable access. Establish a fee reduction or waiver program for low-income applicants to ensure equitable access and participation in the Mills Act Program.PBA 2023 Land Use 2.10 Yes Open space requirements. Evaluate public open space and park requirements in the zoning code for residential and nonresidential uses. Consider requirements and/or incentives to aggregate public open space areas required by two or more uses to form larger and more usable areas and facilities. PBA/PRCSA 2022 - 2027 Land Use 3.2 Yes Design guidelines and standards. Update the zoning code's development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences, schools, day care, and public facilities. PBA 2022 - 2027 Land Use 3.3 Yes Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses.PBA 2022 Land Use 3.4 Yes Funding for air filtration. Seek funding from South Coast Air Quality Management District and other regional sources for the installation of high-efficiency air filtration systems in buildings, homes, and schools located in areas with high levels of localized air pollution, especially for those within environmental justice area boundaries. PBA 2022 Land Use 3.5 Yes Business incentive. Explore economic development incentives and grant funding to encourage existing or draw new business investments in the industrial zones to incorporate more environmentally sustainable practices. CDA Ongoing Land Use 3.6 Yes Lead paint abatement. Coordinate with County of Orange Health Care Agency and community organizations to strengthen local programs and initiatives to eliminate lead-based paint hazards, with priority given to residential buildings located within environmental justice area boundaries. CDA / PBA 2021 & Ongoing Page 6 of 11        City Council 22 – 391 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Land Use 3.14 Yes Sunshine ordinance. Update City Sunshine Ordinance, incorporating best practices for outreach in environmental justice areas in Santa Ana CMO 2022 Land Use 3.15 Yes Communication tools. Explore tools for communication with residents and sensitive receptors when new industrial uses are proposed in their areas PBA 2022 - 2024 Land Use 3.16 Yes Health in corridors. Require a Health Risk Assessment to identify best practices to minimize air quality and noise impacts when considering new residential uses within 500 feet of a freeway.PBA 2022 - 2027 Land Use 3.17 Yes Training for safe practice. Pursue the EPA Renovate Right Program to train local residential contractors for certification as lead renovators to promote safe work practices and prevent lead contamination. PBA 2022 Land Use 3.18 Yes Renovations and lead prevention. Evaluate the feasibility of requiring contractor training and/or certification for safe work practices to conduct residential renovations for pre-1978 structures that may contain existing lead paint. PBA & CDA Ongoing Land Use 3.19 Yes Promote health. Partner with local organizations (e.g., OC Health Care Agency, Latino Health Access, Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified School District, Orange County Environmental Justice, and the Coalition of Community Health Centers) to increase blood lead testing, outreach, education, and referral services through a ‘promotora’ or community peer outreach model that addresses the root causes of elevated blood lead levels impacting Santa Ana residents, with special focus in environmental justice communities and for children living in pre-1978 housing. PBA 2022 - Ongoing Land Use 3.20 Yes Safe housing. Require all residential rehabilitation projects that use local, or HUD federal funds to comply with the Lead Safe Housing Rule, to remove lead paint hazards, depending on the nature of work and the dollar amount of federal investment in the property CDA Ongoing Land Use 3.21 Yes Prevention education. Collaborate with local organizations such as Orange County Health Care Agency, State Environmental Protection Agency, and community-based environmental justice organizations to identify funds and create a Santa Ana Prevent Lead Poisoning Education Program, with special focus on disadvantaged communities and pre-1978 housing stock. PBA 2022 - Ongoing Page 7 of 11        City Council 22 – 392 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Land Use 3.22 Yes Public health outcomes. Support the Orange County Health Care Agency in their role in investigating public complaints regarding unsafe lead work practices and lead hazards wherein children are present, through enforcement of local housing standards to assure healthy outcomes, including for individuals and households presenting with concerns about lead exposure and/or with confirmed lead levels of >3.5ug/dL, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates as the threshold for follow- up and case management in children. PBA 2022 & Ongoingng Land Use 3.23 Yes Agency permits. Work with South Coast Air Quality Management District and Orange County Health Care Agency to evaluate existing special permit process and criteria for approval, and identify potential policy changes to minimize issuance of special permits with potential health impacts. PBA 2022 Land Use 3.24 Yes Public health. Partner with Orange County Health Care Agency and community serving organizations to evaluate best practices and benefits of preparing a Public Health Plan to address environmental hazards in Santa Ana, with special focus in environmental justice communities. Conduct public meetings to gather information and present preliminary findings. PBA 2022 - 2024 Land Use 3.25 Yes Engage EJ communities. Work with community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and residents to form an Ad Hoc Committee to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new disadvantaged EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of environmental justice policies. PBA 2022 Land Use 3.26 Yes Health conditions. Work with state agencies including the Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District, Orange County Health Care Agency and local stakeholders including Orange County Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health to identify PBA Ongoing Land Use 3.27 Yes Groundwater practice. Coordinate with the State Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to monitor the Santa Ana Southeast Groundwater Clean Up Project and identify measurable progress to remediate groundwater contamination. Share information with the community on the City’s Environmental Quality web page. PBA Ongoing Page 8 of 11        City Council 22 – 393 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Land Use 3.28 Yes Tenant protections. Provide information to residential tenants regarding Landlord Tenant Laws in the State, such as AB 1481, and Santa Ana’s Just Cause for Tenant Eviction and Rent Stabilization ordinance that provide protections against evictions for those who seek action to improve substandard housing and hazardous conditions. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Land Use 3.29 Yes Development site history. Update the City’s Development Review application process to require developers to provide information regarding the prior use of the site and history of hazardous materials on the property, in order to identify potential for site contamination from hazardous materials or soil lead contamination to be remediated. PBA 2022 Land Use 4.6 Yes Fireworks and environmental pollution. Study the data available to understand the health effects and environmental exposure, including air quality and noise impacts, from airborne sources such as fireworks shows and displays, with special focus on environmental justice areas. PBA/CMO/PD 2022 - 2024 Land Use 4.7 Yes Construction improvements. Identify best practices and communication tools to monitor mitigation measures and oversight of private and public construction improvements to protect the health and safety of health of the community, with focus on environmental justice areas. PWA/PBA Ongoing Mobility 3.5 Yes Safe routes to schools and parks. Develop and pursue implementation of a Safe Routes to School Plan and a Safe Routes to Parks Plan PWA/PRCSA Ongoing Mobility 4.5 Yes Citywide Design Guidelines update. Update the Citywide Design Guidelines to strengthen pedestrian and cyclist linkages to development centers and residential neighborhoods and coordinate on-site landscape with public realm landscaping.PBA/PWA 2022 - 2027 Mobility 5.8 Yes Air quality improvements. Participate in inter-jurisdictional efforts to promote improvements in air quality and to meet state and federal mandates through advanced technology and TDM programs PBA/PWA 2021-2035 Open Space 1.2 Yes Interagency Forum. Convene an interagency forum to take a coordinated approach to evaluating the feasibility for converting City-owned properties to parkland, with special focus in park deficient and environmental justice areas. PRCSA 2022 Open Space 1.7 Yes Public parkland requirements for residential projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for large residential projects, which include projects of 100 residential units or more, to require public parkland within the City limits and a 10-minute walking distance of the new residential projects. PBA/PRCSA 2022 Page 9 of 11        City Council 22 – 394 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Open Space 1.7A Yes Open space and park land incentives. Allow developers a reduction in on-site open space by giving credits for park land for public use. Establish a process and program to incentivize developers to provide additional on-site and/or publicly accessible open space to create public park land and open space. Research and collaborate with residents, developers, and community organizations to design and implement an open space density bonus to incentivize the creation of additional on-site open space in exchange for more density in the project. PBA & PRCSA 2022-2027 Open Space 1.10 Yes New parkland collaborative. Coordinate with property owners to explore options to provide public access and programming on privately-owned open space in park deficient areas, including options to acquire land through purchase, land dedication, easements, and land leases that would allow for permanent or temporary public use of land for open space and recreational opportunities. PRCSA 2022 & Ongoing Open Space 1.11 Yes Joint-use agreements. Coordinate with public school districts, private schools, and other community organizations to provide community members with access to additional open space and recreational resources. PRCSA 2022 & Ongoing Open Space 1.13 Yes New programming in underserved areas. Partner with community organizations to offer new programs that are accessible to residents who live in areas underserved by open space and recreational facilities. Develop a comprehensive partnership policy providing guidelines that can be used throughout the City organization. PRCSA 2022 Open Space 1.14 Yes Community partnerships. Continue building partnerships with community-based organizations that administer social services to the elderly, youth, and other special needs groups; create use agreements for these providers to use public park facilities to meet the recreational and educational needs of these groups. PRCSA Ongoing Open Space 1.15 Yes Community input. Identify and utilize multilingual and interactive community engagement tools, initiated through the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, for residents and facility users to provide ongoing input about open space needs, park design, facility improvements, and programming PRCSA 2022 Open Space 1.16 Yes Acquisitions to meet park standard. Using the Park Master Plan as guidance, identify and acquire property within the City for park and open space use which will focus on bringing the park and recreation system to three acres of land per 1,000 residents with a plan to keep pace with future urban growth. PRCSA 2022 & ongoing Public Services 1.4 Yes Fiscal priority for public improvements. Identify City fiscal and operational procedures and potential thresholds involved in the prioritization of general funds for public programming, service, or infrastructure improvements for residents living within environmental justice area boundaries. CMO 2021 & annually Page 10 of 11        City Council 22 – 395 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Safety 2.4 Yes Lead contamination. Work with local and regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with environmental justice stakeholders in proposing solutions to remove hazardous lead- contaminated soils in the city and with benchmarks to measure and track effectiveness of proposed programs. PBA/CDA Ongoing Safety 2.5 Yes Business education. Collaborate with state and county agencies and trade organizations to educate and inform industrial business owners about permit regulations required for safe facility operations and about best practices. PBA/CDA Ongoing Page 11 of 11        City Council 22 – 396 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CA. The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision-making process. The following notice is being provided so that you can ask questions, make comments and stay informed about projects that might be important to you. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN - The City Council of the City of Santa Ana will hold a public hearing to receive public testimony and will take action on the item described below. Proposed Action: The City of Santa Ana is proposing to adopt an ordinance extending Ordinance No. NS-3063 for 10 months and 15 days pursuant to Section 65858(a) of the California Government Code continuing a moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 zoning district. Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)3. The activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Furthermore, the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3 because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Meeting Details: This public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in-person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www.santa- ana.org/agendas-and-minutes/. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to eComment@santa-ana.org (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or mail to Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the City Council but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: All staff reports regarding any item on this agenda are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during regular business hours and posted on the City’s website the Tuesday before a Council meeting at: https://www.santa-ana.org/agendas-and-minutes/. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Margarita Macedonio with the Planning and Building Agency by phone at (714) 667-2288 or by email at MMacedonio@santa-ana.org.         City Council 22 – 397 4/1/2025 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de llamar a Margarita Macedonio (714) 667-2288. Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Tony Lai số (714) 565-2627.         City Council 22 – 398 4/1/2025 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU CNS D A I L Y J O U R N A L C O R P O R A T I O N To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER. Please read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): Daily Journal Corporation Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California. Call your local Mailing Address : 915 E 1ST ST, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Telephone (213) 229-5300 / Fax (213) 229-5481 Visit us @ WWW.LEGALADSTORE.COM NUVIA OCAMPO CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR SANTA ANA, CA 92702 GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE SD-84 01/31/2025 Publication ONLINE NetTotal $2204.80 $551.20 $2756.00 BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE (951) 784-0111 DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027 SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 SAN JOSE POST-RECORD, SAN JOSE (408) 287-4866 THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355 THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486 THE INTER-CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 272-4747 Notice Type: Ad Description: COPY OF NOTICE 3891625 !A000007012806! The charge(s) for this order is as follows. An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an invoice. NOTICE OF STUDY SESSION & PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision-making process. This notice is provided consistent with applicable State and local law, in addition to being provided to those persons who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage those with questions or comments to contact us prior to either or both the Study Session and/or Public Hearing. Please be advised that the City will hold a Study Session concerning the following, more fully described below:Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning)during the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on the following date and time: Study Session Date:Monday, February 10, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM Further, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana will hold a public hearing to receive public testimony and take action on Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning). Public Hearing Date:Monday, February 24, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM Project Location :The area within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, as depicted in the attached map. Project Applicant:City of Santa Ana Proposed Project:Planning Commission recommendation that the City Council adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and to amend the City's Zoning Map. The proposed amendments include removal of industrial uses from the permitted uses table, updates to the nonconforming regulations, a new amortization process, and new operational standards applicable to businesses within the zoning district. The proposal also includes removing         City Council 22 – 399 4/1/2025 the Light Industrial (M1)and Heavy Industrial (M2)suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district,as shown on the City's Zoning Map. En viron mental Impact:In accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines,an addendum has been prepared to the City of Santa Ana's Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Environmental Impact Report (EIR)to demonstrate that,pursuant to the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162,this project is within the scope of the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84)EIR No.2006- 02,State Clearinghouse (SCH)No. 2006071100,certified by the City of Santa Ana on June 7,2010.The Transit Zoning Code (SD-84)EIR fully analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed code amendments.This is consistent with Section 8.06 of the City's Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. Meeting Details:This matter will be heard in the City Council Chambers,22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana,CA 92701.Members of the public may at tend this me eting in person or join via Zoom.For the most up-to-date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting,please visit https://www.santa- ana.org/planning-and-building- meeting-participation/. Written Commen ts:If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments@santa- ana.org (reference the Agenda Item #in the subject line)or by mail to Nuvia Ocampo,Recording Secretary,City of Santa Ana,20 Civic Center Plaza ---M20,Santa Ana,CA 92701.Deadline to submit written comments is 3 :30 p.m.on the day of the meeting.Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information : Additional details regarding the proposed action(s),including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at https://santa- ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any project questions,please contact Principal Community Planner Margarita Macedonio with the Planning Division by phone at (714)667-2288 or by email at MMacedonio@santa- ana.org. Note:If you challenge the decision on the above matter,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at,or prior to,the public hearing. N u c n liên l c b ng ti ng Vi t,xi n i n tho i cho Kristie Ha (714)667- 2206. 1/31/25 CNS-3891625# ORA NGE CO UNTY REGISTER         City Council 22 – 400 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF STUDY SESSION & PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision-making process. This notice is provided consistent with applicable State and local law, in addition to being provided to those persons who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage those with questions or comments to contact us prior to either or both the Study Session and/or Public Hearing. Please be advised that the City will hold a Study Session concerning the following, more fully described below: Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning) during the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on the following date and time: Study Session Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM Further, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana will hold a public hearing to receive public testimony and take action on Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning). Public Hearing Date: Monday, February 24, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM Project Location: The area within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, as depicted in the attached map. Project Applicant: City of Santa Ana Proposed Project: Planning Commission recommendation that the City Council adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and to amend the City’s Zoning Map. The proposed amendments include removal of industrial uses from the permitted uses table, updates to the nonconforming regulations, a new amortization process, and new operational standards applicable to businesses within the zoning district. The proposal also includes removing the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district, as shown on the City’s Zoning Map. Environmental Impact: In accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, an addendum has been prepared to the City of Santa Ana’s Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to demonstrate that, pursuant to the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, this project is within the scope of the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) EIR No. 2006-02, State Clearinghouse         City Council 22 – 401 4/1/2025 (SCH) No. 2006071100, certified by the City of Santa Ana on June 7, 2010. The Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) EIR fully analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed code amendments. This is consistent with Section 8.06 of the City’s Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in person or join via Zoom. For the most up-to-date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building-meeting-participation/. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments@santa-ana.org (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or by mail to Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any project questions, please contact Principal Community Planner Margarita Macedonio with the Planning Division by phone at (714) 667-2288 or by email at MMacedonio@santa-ana.org. Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Kristie Ha (714) 667-2206. City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code Area         City Council 22 – 402 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/pb Item # 1 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Planning Commission Staff Report March 6, 2025 Topic: Supplemental Staff Report to February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report: Resolution to make findings and adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024- 03 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) addressing industrial land uses, nonconformities, and operating standards, and amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 district boundary. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Recommend that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a while, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD-84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, and addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) NO. 2024- 02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84)) of chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non-conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non-conforming uses. 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Planning Commission 1 – 1 3/6/2025 Exhibit 7 - March 6, 2025 Special Planning Commission Supplemental Staff Report and Exhibits     City Council 22 – 403 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments Supplemental Staff Report to February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report) March 6, 2025 Page 2 3 3 6 7 BACKGROUND On February 24, 2025, the Santa Ana Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on amendments proposed for the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), ZOA No. 2024-02, the companion Zoning Map amendment, No. 2024-03, and the Addendum to TZC SD-84 Final EIR. Upon hearing all testimony, the Commission closed the public hearing, held discussion, provided direction to staff, and continued the item to a special meeting scheduled for March 6, 2025. The Commission requested that staff conduct and provide certain deliverables for their further consideration of the proposed amendments, in order to render a recommendation to the City Council on the proposed TZC amendments. The three requested actions for staff were as follows: 1) Conduct an additional community meeting collectively, with interested parties in attendance at the hearing, including residents, businesses, and property owners, to facilitate further input on the proposed amendments; 2) Prepare a financial analysis to address potential impacts to the City as a result of adopting the proposed amendments; and 3) Provide a legal briefing related to potential challenges that may result from adoption of the proposed amendments. DISCUSSION The actionable items requested by the Commission have been addressed by staff and are summarized below. Community Meeting – March 3, 2025 Staff held the requested additional community meeting with interested parties, including business owners, property owners, residents and others, on Monday, March 3, 2025, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) First Floor Conference Room (1000 E. Santa Ana Blvd.) to garner additional feedback about the proposed changes. For a summary of the meeting, meeting format, and conclusions from the meeting, please refer to Exhibit 1. As a result of the input received at that meeting, combined with the prior analysis of the proposed amendments as outlined in the February 24, 2025, Planning Commission staff report, staff proposes making clarifying edits as well as text edits to the Ordinance presented to the Planning Commission on February 24, 2025, as provided in Exhibit 2 (Clarifications to ZOA No. 2024-02). Specifically, the clarifications address typographical errors as well as the emergent themes from the March 3rd community meeting related to hours of operation and clarifying that nonconforming and “legal” nonconforming are one and the same term for the purposes of implementing the TZC.   Planning Commission 1 – 2 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 404 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments Supplemental Staff Report to February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report) March 6, 2025 Page 3 3 3 6 7 Financial Information related to adoption of proposed TZC amendments The Planning Commission requested City staff to provide financial information specifically on the amendments’ effects on City revenues that would result from the proposed ordinance. Staff from the City’s Finance and Management Services Agency evaluated aggregate financial information using data sources for the City’s tax base that include sales tax, property tax, businesses license tax, and utility users’ tax within the TZC. This information will be provided as part of City staff’s presentation during the scheduled meeting. Lastly, due to confidentiality requirements, revenue details provided are in general and aggregate form, preventing the disclosure of individual business revenue. The fiscal information is intended for general informational purposes only. The actual fiscal impact cannot be determined and may vary significantly due to numerous unpredictable factors, including the fact the proposed ordinance does not propose the closure of any business; rendering businesses uses legal nonconforming does not preclude the establishment of a new, similar business in the same location that may result in no change to the City’s revenues; fluctuations in economic conditions; and potential changes in business operations. Legal Analysis The Commission requested that the City Attorney provide a briefing related to legal challenges to the proposed TZC amendments, specifically the creation of nonconforming status to business and structures, and the general argument of a “taking,” as that term is used legally. The City Attorney’s Office has provided a confidential memorandum separately to the Planning Commission summarizing these legal questions. Due to the potential for litigation, the information contained in the memorandum is considered client privileged and confidential. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies and local governments to measure the environmental impacts of development projects or other major land use decisions, and to limit or avoid those impacts if possible. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states the following with respect to an Addendum to an EIR: a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.  Planning Commission 1 – 3 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 405 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments Supplemental Staff Report to February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report) March 6, 2025 Page 4 3 3 6 7 d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. Additionally, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, states the following with respect to a Subsequent EIRs: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A)The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B)Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C)Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D)Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation.   Planning Commission 1 – 4 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 406 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments Supplemental Staff Report to February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report) March 6, 2025 Page 5 3 3 6 7 ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03 are considered a project as defined by the CEQA. The City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that it is subject to CEQA guidelines and regulations (Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21000-21177). An Addendum, attached as Exhibit 5, to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearing House (SCH) No. 2006071100) has been prepared by the City. Based on its independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, and, in the exercising its independent judgement, hereby finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required for the proposed project; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR is required for the adoption of the Ordinances. Specifically, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City finds on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that: (1) no substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified as complete, that shows any of the following: (A) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (B) significant effect previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (C) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) mitigation measures or alternative which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Additionally, as detailed in the General Plan Consistency subsection of the Planning Commission’s February 24, 2025 staff report, attached as Exhibit 6 (February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report, without attachments), the proposed Ordinances are consistent with numerous General Plan goals and policies that were evaluated as part of the General Plan Update Program EIR. The proposed Ordinances also satisfy and further implementation actions of the General Plan Update. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. March 3, 2025 Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Community Meeting Summary   Planning Commission 1 – 5 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 407 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments Supplemental Staff Report to February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report) March 6, 2025 Page 6 3 3 6 7 2. Clarifications to ZOA No. 2024-02 3. Ordinance for Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 4. Ordinance for Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 5. Resolution of the City Council and Addendum to TZC EIR 6. February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report (Without Attachments) 7. Copy of Public Notice Submitted By: Margarita Macedonio, Principal Planner Approved By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Acting Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency   Planning Commission 1 – 6 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 408 4/1/2025 Exhibit 1: Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) March 3, 2025 Community Meeting Summary Page 1 Overview At the Planning Commission public hearing on Monday, February 24, 2025, the Planning Commission continued the proposed amendment to the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) and zoning map item to a special meeting scheduled for Thursday, March 6, 2025 at 6:30 p.m. at Santa Ana City Hall Council Chamber (22 Civic Center Plaza). In addition, the Planning Commission directed staff to conduct an additional community meeting, before the March 6th special meeting, with interested parties in attendance at the hearing, including residents, businesses, and property owners, to garner additional feedback on the proposed amendments. This report summarizes the meeting outcomes, detailing outreach efforts, participation format, and key themes derived from community input. Additionally, it emphasizes and implements the Planning Commission's intent to facilitate continued collaboration between residents and businesses in identifying areas of common ground and potential compromise regarding the proposed amendments. Outreach To ensure broad participation, staff conducted extensive outreach for the March 3, 2025, community meeting. Staff contacted community members that provided public testimony at the regularly scheduled February 24, 2025 Planning Commission meeting that provided contact information and members of the public on the project interested parties list, directly emailing invitations to approximately 184 individuals, and personally calling those without email, securing updated contact details. Staff also programmed and sent a pre- recorded voice message reminder to approximately 130 contacts. Finally, staff sent a same-day email reminder. To ensure inclusivity, staff also arranged for Spanish interpretation services for the community meeting. Location The meeting was held on Monday, March 3, 2025, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) First Floor Conference Room. The meeting location is located within the boundaries of the Transit Zoning Code and in close proximity to both established residential communities within the district and properties with an industrial overlay subzone. Participation Format The meeting included a presentation that covered the major points of the proposed ordinance and the purpose of the meeting as directed by the Planning Commission, with a majority of the meeting time allocated to small group discussion. The small group   Planning Commission 1 – 7 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 409 4/1/2025 Exhibit 1: Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) March 3, 2025 Community Meeting Summary Page 2 discussion format kept the meeting focused on facilitating a productive dialogue, achieving consensus and thoughtful solutions, with discussion centered on two questions: 1) What industrial and quasi-industrial business types operating today within the district can be considered compatible with residential uses? 2) What new proposed operational standards—for example, limits on hours of operation, prohibition on truck idling—create the greatest concerns for businesses, and how might they be adjusted/refined without adversely impacting residential uses? Attendance and Randomly-Assigned Small Groups Approximately, 120 people attended the March 3, 2025, meeting comprised of residents, businesses, property owners, real estate brokers, community-based organizations, and staff from the offices of elected representatives. Of those in attendance, approximately, 58 percent represented businesses and 36 percent of the community members in attendance were residents of the area. Although staff recognizes that not all attendees sign in, the meeting sign in sheets indicate 94 contacts. To fulfill the Planning Commission's directive for open community dialogue, staff designed a check-in system that randomly assigned attendees to small groups using color stickers to help balance representation from resident and businesses. At the check-in tables, attendees indicated whether they were a resident, business or property owner, and their nametag included color stickers to assign them randomly to a small group. Each group included a facilitator led by City staff or one of the City’s planning consultants to help guide the discussion and comments to identify areas of commonality, or compromise from residents and businesses regarding the proposed amendments. Lastly, Spanish interpreters were present at one of the small groups to facilitate mono-lingual Spanish speakers’ participation in the meeting. Conclusion The meeting was held in accordance with and satisfied the Planning Commission’s direction provided to staff on February 24, 2025 to conduct a community meeting with both business owners and residents. Areas of consensus included ensuring that the ordinance addresses the most impactful industrial businesses, while areas of disagreement remain in the extent to which the proposed amendments will result in land use changes. Lastly, specific feedback from business owners addressing the definition of craft and specialized automotive restoration service, hours of operation, and the   Planning Commission 1 – 8 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 410 4/1/2025 Exhibit 1: Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) March 3, 2025 Community Meeting Summary Page 3 terms “nonconforming use” and “legal nonconforming use” having the same meaning, have been added to Exhibit 2 (Clarifications to ZOA No. 2024-02).   Planning Commission 1 – 9 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 411 4/1/2025 Exhibit 2: Clarifications to ZOA No. 2024-02 1 The following represents clarifications proposed to the draft Ordinance text published for the February 24, 2025, Planning Commission hearing agenda. The clarifications include non-substantive, typographical errors as well as proposed amendments that respond to community feedback received at the March 3, 2025, community meeting referenced in the staff report and in Exhibit 1. The following non-substantive, typographical clarifications shall be included in the draft Ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission for City Council consideration: 1. Revise all typographical errors related to numeric/alphanumeric labeling of sections and subsections. 2. Ordinance Page 24, Subsection (I) of Section 41-2008 (Operational Standards) in Section 10 of the Ordinance shall read as follows, reflecting proposed text in underline and deleted text in strikethrough: (l) Operational standards for aAutomobile servicing uses including nonconforming establishments, shall comply with the following operational standards: 3. Ordinance Page 33, Subsection 35. b. of Section 41-2080 (Definitions) in Section 12 of the Ordinance shall read as follows, reflecting proposed text in underline and deleted text in strikethrough: b. art supplies, including framing services bicycles 4. Ordinance Page 4, Subsection (5) b. of Section 41-2002 (Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses) in Section 5 of the Ordinance shall read as follows, reflecting proposed text in underline and deleted text in strikethrough: b. Rehabilitation may include expansion of floor area without intensification of the nonconforming use when the total floor area of all expansions occurring in any five year period does not exceed ten (10) percent of the floor area as it legally existed as permitted and constructed as of April 15, 2025 at the beginning of the five year period, provided that the following standards conditions are met: 5. Ordinance Page 10, Subsection (6) c. of Section 41-2002 (Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses) in Section 6 of the ordinance shall read as follows reflecting proposed text in underline and deleted text in strikethrough related to the Hearing Officer Determination and Compliance: c. Hearing Officer Determination and Compliance. The determination of the Hearing Officer shall be made in writing and shall be final.   Planning Commission 1 – 10 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 412 4/1/2025 Exhibit 2: Clarifications to ZOA No. 2024-02 2 1. Notice of Amortization and Termination of Use. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall give notice by certified mail of the date upon which an amortization period will end to each owner of record whose property, or use of property, is not in conformance with the regulations of this Article, in those instances where an amortization period has been determined pursuant to this Article. Such notice shall be sent within ten (10) days of the termination of any appeal period the determination of the Hearing Officer. If the amortization period ends before or less than six (6) months after providing such notice, the notice shall be given that the amortization period in each instance shall be not less than six (6) months from the date the notice is sent. The notice shall set forth all pertinent provisions of this Article, including the declared purposes thereof and the approved amortization term. Failure to send notice by mail to any such owner where the address of such owner is not a matter of public record shall not invalidate any proceedings under this Article. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall be authorized record a Notice of Amortization Term & Termination of Use with the County Recorder, as provided for in California Government Code Section 27201(a). The following changes based upon community feedback received at the Transit Zoning Code community meeting held on March 3, 2025, shall be included in the draft Ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission for City Council consideration: 6. Ordinance Page 24, Subsection (l) of Section 41-2008 (Operational Standards), which proposed prohibiting automobile servicing on Sundays shall remain unchanged and reflect the existing standard as shown below: (l) Automobile servicing uses including nonconforming establishments, shall comply with the following operational standards: (1)No automobile servicing shall be conducted before 7:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and before 10:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. (2)All work shall be conducted inside an enclosed structure. (3)Outdoor or overnight vehicle storage is not permitted. 7. Ordinance Page 27, Subsection (k) of Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses), which proposed imposing new operational hours shall be removed in its entirety, as the operating hours imposed on all uses under   Planning Commission 1 – 11 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 413 4/1/2025 Exhibit 2: Clarifications to ZOA No. 2024-02 3 Section 41-2008 would apply. The ordinance shall read as follows reflecting proposed text deletion in strikethrough related to hours of operation: (k) Hours of Operation (1)For non-conforming industrial uses which are directly across a street from or abutting residential uses or structures, hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. (2)No operating hours are permitted on Sundays, or Federal Holidays. 8. Ordinance Page 35, Subsection 50. of Section 41-2080 (Definitions), in Section 12 of the ordinance related to the definition of nonconforming industrial use shall read as follows reflecting proposed text in underline: 50.Nonconforming Industrial Use: A nonconforming use as defined in Section 41-126 of the SAMC that was established on any parcel or within any building located within the boundaries of SD-84 established by this Article that is listed in the uses permitted or uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit of Division 18. M-1 (Light Industrial) or Division 19. M-2 (Heavy Industrial) of this Chapter but that are no longer permissible through amendment to this Article. The terms “nonconforming use” and “legal nonconforming use” have the same meaning in the implementation of this Article. 9. Ordinance Page 31, Subsection 23. of Section 41-2080 (Definitions), in Section 12 of the ordinance related to the definition of craft and specialized automotive restoration service shall read as follows reflecting proposed text in underline and deleted text in strikethrough: 23. Craft and specialized automotive restoration service: A specialized business or commercial enterprise occurring inside of a fully-enclosed structure that focuses on repairing and restoring older cars, often considered "collector cars" as defined by the State; which includes (1) a vehicle model 35+ years old, (2) a vehicle model 25+ years old with historic plates, or (3) a vehicle model classified as a special interest vehicle. Such restoration services return these types of vehicles to their original condition, including mechanical components, bodywork, and interior, aiming to preserve their historical authenticity and aesthetic appeal. The vehicle must not be altered from the manufacturer's original specifications or considered a "kit" car.   Planning Commission 1 – 12 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 414 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 1 of 49 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2024-02, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 41 (ZONING) OF ARTICLE XIX OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE REGULATIONS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND MAPS IN THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE/SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT (SD) NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT; MODIFYING THE AUTHORIZED LAND USES AND PERMIT TYPES; ESTABLISHING REVISED NONCONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF AN AMORTIZATION/TERMINATION OF USE PROCESS AND ADDING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN PERMITTED AND NONCONFORMING USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has, by separate action taken on March 18, 2025, adopted an Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100), which was certified on June 7, 2010, by the City Council (“Addendum”). The Addendum analyzed the environmental impacts of the actions taken in this Ordinance. Adopting the Addendum satisfied the City Council’s obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) regarding amendments to the Transit Zoning Code and none of the conditions in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines 15162 apply. Thus, no further environmental review is required as adoption of this Ordinance falls within the scope of the adopted Addendum and previously certified EIR. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts the findings contained in the attached Exhibit “A” to this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. Section 41-2001 (Application of Article) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2001. Application of Article (a)The Transit Zoning Code, as authorized by Chapter 41, Article III, Division 26, Section 41-593 et seq., of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), is subject to the standards and regulations contained in this Article for the express purpose of establishing land use regulations and standards. All other applicable chapters, articles, and sections of the SAMC and any other regulations adopted by the City Council shall apply unless expressly stated or superseded by this Article. All terms contained herein shall be defined by the SAMC, unless specifically defined in this Article. Exhibit 3: Ordinance for Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 ___________________________________________________________________________   Planning Commission 1 – 13 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 415 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 2 of 49 (b) Proposed development, including the construction, reconstruction or structural alteration of a structure, subdivisions, and new and existing land uses, whether conforming or nonconforming, as defined in Section 41-126 of the SAMC, within the specific development area shall comply with all the applicable regulations established by this Article article. (c) The regulations contained in this Article shall also apply to: 1. A change in land use within an existing building; and 2. A change in tenancy within an existing building requiring issuance of a new Certificate of Occupancy.” Section 4. Section 41-2001.5 (Organization) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2001.5 Organization (a) Regulating Plan and Zones Established: Sections 41-2006 through 2008 2009 of this Article defines the zones within the Specific Development (SD) boundaries of SD-84, the parcels included within each zone, and describes, zone by zone, the standards for building placement, design, and use consistent with the permitted uses identified in Table 2A. (b) Use Standards: Table 2A identifies the land use types allowed by the City in each of the zones established by the Regulating Plan. A parcel within the Specific Development (SD-84) boundaries shall be occupied only by land uses identified as allowed within the applicable zone and the type of City approval required by Table 2A. (c) Urban Standards by Zone: Sections 41-2010 through 2015 of this Article regulates the features of buildings that affect the public realm. The urban standards regulate building and parking placement, height, and profile, and vary according to the parcel's zone applied by the Regulating Plan. Standards for items not explicitly described in this section, including but not limited to, walls and fences, mechanical equipment, trash bin enclosures, heliport and helipad, underground utility, installation of dish antennas, loading areas, parking lot design standards, refer to other Sections of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code SAMC and the Citywide Design Guidelines. (d) Architectural Standards: Sections 41-2020 through 2039 regulates the manner in which individual parcels and blocks are developed to create diverse and pedestrian-oriented development, through the use of three main components: (1) Sections 41-2020 through 2032 building types (e.g., duplex, rowhouse, courtyard housing)   Planning Commission 1 – 14 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 416 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 3 of 49 (2) Sections 41-2033 through 2039 frontage types (e.g., front yard/porch, stoop, arcade, shopfront) (3) Section 41-2040 (Table 4.3A) architectural styles (e.g., Main Street Commercial, Mission Revival, Art Deco, Folk Victorian, Craftsman, California Contemporary). (e) Sign Standards: Section 41-2050 regulates all signage within the SD boundaries to be consistent with the character described for each zone. (f) Subdivision Guidelines: Establishes guidelines for the creation and maintenance of a finely grained and walkable network of blocks punctuated by integral and varied open spaces. (g) Street Network Concepts: identifies conceptual location and guidelines for the street network. This section provides guidelines for the rights-of-way alignment, and width in plan and section with the corresponding details. (h) Definitions: Sections 41-2080 identifies and defines the terms used in this Code.” Section 5. Section 41-2002 (Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2002. Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses (a) A nonconforming building, structure or use shall comply with Article VI of this Chapter, except as provided below modified as follows: (1) A building or structure that does not conform to the architectural style or story height requirements at the time of the adoption of this Article shall not cause the structure to be non-conforming. (2) A nonconforming building, structure or use shall not be required to conform to current zoning regulations based solely upon a change in ownership of the property, except as otherwise provided in this Article. (3) A sale, lease or other transfer of a property containing a nonconforming building, structure or use does not trigger the loss of nonconforming status, except as otherwise provided in this Article. (24)Sections 41-681.1 through 41-681.4 and 41-683.6 of Article VI of this Chapter shall not apply to this buildings, structures and uses addressed within this Article or building, structures, and uses within SD-84, nor to existing accessory dwelling units (ADUs) permitted by the City of Santa Ana before the amendment to this Article.   Planning Commission 1 – 15 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 417 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 4 of 49 (35)Rehabilitation, enlargement or exterior structural alterations of any nonconforming structure or structure occupied by a nonconforming use, except for structures occupied by single family and two-family dwellings, may be rehabilitated made as follows: a. Rehabilitation, limited to structural or non -structural alterations without any building expansion and without any intensification of a nonconforming use, is permitted if: 1. The operational standards contained in sections 41-2008 and 41-2009, as applicable, of this Article are met. 1. 2. All signage on the structure and the site on which it is located is brought into conformity with the signage requirements of this Chapter , as approved by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. 2. 3. All outdoor storage is screened by a solid screen wall not to exceed eight (8) feet in height. Outdoor storage shall not exceed the height of the screen wall. 3. 4. There shall be no increase in the number of dwelling units unless the site on which the structure is located complies with the off-street parking and open space requirements of this Chapter. 4. 5. Architectural massing, features and detailing shall be modified to bring the structure into closer compliance with the architectural standards of this Article code, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. b. Rehabilitation may include expansion of floor area without intensification of the nonconforming use when the total floor area of all expansions occurring in any five-year period does not exceed ten (10) percent of the floor area as it legally existed as permitted and constructed as of April 15, 2025 at the beginning of the five year period, provided that the following standards conditions are met: 1. The existing use is not a nonconforming industrial use. Nonconforming industrial uses may not be expanded. 2. The operational standards contained in Section 41-2008 are met. 1. 3. All signage on the structure and the site on which it is located shall be brought into conformity with the requirements of this chapter Chapter as approved by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee.   Planning Commission 1 – 16 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 418 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 5 of 49 2. 4. There shall be no loading or unloading of vehicles between the hours of 10 pm and 7 am. 3. 5. All outdoor storage is screened by a solid screen wall not to exceed eight (8) feet in height. Outdoor storage shall not exceed the height of the screen wall. 4. 6. There shall be no enlargement which would intrude into any required setback area required by this Article. 5. 7. There shall be no enlargement which would result in a new nonconforming condition in violation of the requirements of this Chapter. 6. 8. Off-street parking shall be provided in conformance with the requirements of this Chapter. 7. 9. Landscaping shall be improved to bring the site on which the structure is located into closer compliance with the landscaping requirements of this Chapter, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. 8. 10. Architectural massing, features and detailing, shall be modified to bring the structure into closer compliance with the architectural standards of this Chapter, as approved deemed appropriate by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or their designee. (46)Rehabilitation, enlargement or exterior structural alterations of buildings occupied by a single family and two-family dwellings is permitted subject to the following: a. Structural alterations and additions may be made where the total floor area of all such expansions occurring in a five-year period does not exceed forty (40) percent of the floor space of the building as it existed at the beginning of that five-year period, provided the number of dwelling units is not increased; and no new non-conformances with the requirements of this code Chapter are created. b. Structural alterations and additions which exceed forty (40) percent of the total floor area as it existed at the beginning of a five -year period; or remodeling which involves the demolition of more than fifty (50) percent of the building shall be permitted; provided that the following conditions are met: 1. Off-street parking shall be provided in conformance with the requirements of this Chapter. 2. No new nonconformities with the requirements of this Chapter are created.   Planning Commission 1 – 17 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 419 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 6 of 49 3. A minimum of eight hundred (800) square feet of usable, continuous, non-front yard open-space, excluding driveways and parking areas is provided. Any open space with a minimum dimension of fifteen (15) feet by fifteen (15) feet shall be deemed continuous open space. c. Where rehabilitation of a building involves more than fifty (50) percent of a building wall which encroaches into a front or side yard setback and is demolished or is structurally altered, the remainder of the building wall shall be demolished. Any subsequent building wall shall conform to all provisions of this Chapter. d. An existing two-car garage with a minimum dimension of eighteen (18) feet by eighteen (18) feet exterior dimension shall be considered con - forming. e. Remodeling shall mean to reconstruct, or to make over in structure or style, but shall exclude re-roof, window replacement, exterior finish replacement and repair or similar modifications, as determined by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. f. No provision contained in this Article shall be interpreted or implemented in a manner inconsistent with State law addressing accessory dwelling units, as contained in Government Code Section 66310, et. seq., as amended from time to time. (5) Discontinuance of Nonconforming Uses, Generally. Nonconforming uses shall be discontinued pursuant to Sec. 41-683 (Discontinuance of nonconforming building or use) of this Chapter, regardless of intent, except as provided below: a. Discontinuance of Noxious Use. 1. If a nonconforming industrial use that meets the definition of a Noxious Uses as defined in this Article requires a new certificate of occupancy for any reason other than a change in business name with no change in owner of the business, legal nonconforming status shall be lost and any subsequent use must conform in every respect to the provisions of this Article. 2. If a nonconforming industrial use that meets the definition of a Noxious Use as defined in this Article is in violation of any applicable Federal, State, or local regulation, as provided below, legal nonconforming status shall be lost and any subsequent use of the building shall conform in every respect to the provisions of this Chapter: A. The violation lasts a period of thirty (30) consecutive days; or B. The violation(s) are observed and documented for a total period of sixty (60) days in a one-year period; or   Planning Commission 1 – 18 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 420 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 7 of 49 C. Three noncompliant notices from a Federal, State, or local regulatory agency relating to or arising from the nonconforming use are sent in a one-year period. 3. For the purpose of this subsection 5(a)(2): A. The thirty (30) consecutive day time period shall be measured from the date of the first observed and documented violation. B. A one-year period shall be the twelve (12) consecutive months of time preceding the sixtieth (60th) day of total violations; or the twelve (12) consecutive months of time preceding the issuance of the third (3rd) noncompliant notice. C. Local regulations mean the SAMC, including, but not limited to, the operational standards contained in Section 41-2009 of this Article. D. A local regulatory agency includes the City, County of Orange, special districts, or any other local government agency charged with regulating noxious uses. E. Noncompliant notices may include, but are not limited to, Notice to Comply and Notice of Violation as issued by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQB). (6) Elimination of Nonconforming Uses and Structures. a. Elimination of Nonconforming Uses and Structures, Generally. 1. The City Council has determined that elimination of nonconforming uses and structures by amortization may be considered based upon one or more of the following factors: A. The threat to the public health, safety, and welfare posed by the continuance of the nonconforming use or structure; B. Adaptability of the land and improvements to a currently permitted use; C. Compatibility with the existing land use patterns and densities of the surrounding neighborhood;   Planning Commission 1 – 19 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 421 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 8 of 49 D. Excessive calls for service to applicable response agencies related to the operation of the nonconforming use; and E. Failures to remedy notices of violation, administrative warnings, or other notices of noncompliance issued by a Federal, State, or local agency, including the City. 2. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, in conjunction with other City Departments and Agencies, may establish, and periodically update, a list or data resource that identifies categories of nonconforming uses or structures with specific metrics and operational characteristics, to develop a ranking system for use in the consideration of eliminating nonconforming uses or structures through amortization. 3. The determination of an appropriate amortization period for termination of a nonconforming use pursuant to this Article shall be made by a Hearing Officer retained by the City and who has professional legal and land use experience to address amortization. The Hearing Officer shall order nonconforming uses and structures to be discontinued and removed from their sites within a period determined pursuant to the process set forth in Subsection b (Establishment of Amortization Periods), and consider the following: A. If the nonconforming user has not made a substantial investment in furtherance of the use or structure, or if the investment can be substantially utilized or recovered through a currently permitted use, the order may require a nonconforming use or structure to be discontinued and removed from their site within a minimum of one year after the date of the order. B. If the nonconforming user has made a substantial investment in furtherance of the use or structure, or if the investment cannot be substantially utilized or recovered through a currently permitted use, the order may require the discontinuation and removal of the nonconforming use or structure within a longer reasonable amount of time. C. Nonconforming uses or structures that are determined to be an imminent threat to the public health or safety may be subject to immediate cessation and removal, pursuant to Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the SAMC. 4. Nonconforming uses and structures may also, upon order from the City or a court order, be subject to immediate cessation and removal of the nonconforming use or structure. b. Establishment of Amortization Periods. Where a period during which a nonconforming use or structure is to be discontinued and removed from a   Planning Commission 1 – 20 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 422 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 9 of 49 site or sites is required pursuant to this Article, such period shall be established as follows: 1. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Ag ency, or designee, shall submit the nonconforming use or structure and a recommended amortization period, based on subsection 4. herein, to a Hearing Officer pursuant to Chapter 3 of the SAMC for review; 2. The Hearing Officer shall hold a noticed hearing to consider the recommended amortization period. Notice of the hearing shall be provided to the owner or operator of the nonconforming use or structure and the property owner at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Additional notice may also be provided to surrounding property owners and/or tenants, at the discretion of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. 3. The Hearing Officer shall consider the recommendations submitted by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, the General Plan of the City, and any testimony or evidence provided during the hearing, in order to determine the amortization schedule for elimination of the nonconforming use or structure. 4. The Hearing Officer shall establish a maximum amortization period during which the nonconforming use or structure shall be permitted to continue after considering the following in relation to the use or structure: A. The amount of investment or original cost of the use or structure; B. The present actual or depreciated value of the use or structure; C. The remaining useful life of the use or structure; D. The remaining term of the lease (if applicable); E. The date or dates of construction; F. Amortization of the business or structure for tax purposes; G. The salvage value; H. Adaptability of the land and improvements to a currently permitted use; I. Cost of moving and reestablishing the use elsewhere; J. Compatibility with the existing land use patterns and densities of the surrounding neighborhood;   Planning Commission 1 – 21 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 423 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 10 of 49 K. The threat to the public health, safety, and welfare posed by the continuance of the nonconforming use or structure; L. Calls for service to applicable response agencies; M. Notices of violation, administrative warnings, or other notices of noncompliance arising from or related to the nonconforming use issued by a Federal, State, or local agency, including the City; and N. Other factors as appropriate. c. Hearing Officer Determination and Compliance. The determination of the Hearing Officer shall be made in writing and shall be final. 1. Notice of Amortization and Termination of Use. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall give notice by certified mail of the date upon which an amortization period will end to each owner of record whose property, or use of property, is not in conformance with the regulations of this Article, in those instances where an amortization period has been determined pursuant to this Article. Such notice shall be sent within ten (10) days of the termination of any appeal period. If the amortization period ends before or less than six (6) months after providing such notice, the notice shall be given that the amortization period in each instance shall be not less than six (6) months from the date the notice is sent. The notice shall set forth all pertinent provisions of this Article, including the declared purposes thereof and the approved amortization term. Failure to send notice by mail to any such owner where the address of such owner is not a matter of public record shall not invalidate any proceedings under this Article. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall be authorized record a Notice of Amortization Term & Termination of Use with the County Recorder, as provided for in California Government Code Section 27201(a). 2. Notice of Termination and Order to Comply and Conclusion of Amortization Period. Notice of Termination of a nonconforming use and order to comply shall be served by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, at the end of the amortization period upon the owner of record whose property contains such nonconforming use. In those instances, where the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, is unable with reasonable effort to serve such notice to the property owner, such notice and order shall be served within thirty (30) days of the end of the amortization period by delivering same to an occupant of the structure containing the nonconforming use.   Planning Commission 1 – 22 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 424 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 11 of 49 3. Request for a Continuance of Nonconformities Beyond Period of Amortization Period. A request for a continuance of nonconformities beyond the period of amortization may be granted as follows: a. Grounds for Continuance. A nonconforming use or structure may be maintained for a reasonable time beyond its period of amortization as specified in this Article if the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, makes the following determinations: i. Special Circumstances. That special circumstances apply to any such use or structure that do not apply generally to others affected hereby; and ii. Compatibility with Public Welfare. That such a continuance for a prescribed period of additional time is in the public interest and will be reasonably compatible with, and not detrimental to, the use of adjacent properties. b. Application Process for Continuance. Any application for a continuance of a nonconforming use or structure must be filed with the Planning Division no later than thirty (30) days following the service of a Notice of Termination and Order to comply, or within thirty (30) days following the continued termination date. An application for a continuance may be filed by the owner of the property, a person with a power of attorney from the owner of the property, or a lessee, if the terms of the lease permit the existing use. Fees shall be required in accordance with this Code. c. Determination by Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. Upon filing of a complete application, the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, shall investigate the matter, give proper notice to the applicant, hold an administrative hearing and make a decision thereon based on the criteria set out in this Section and supported by written findings of fact within seventy-five (75) days from the date the application is filed, or within such extended period of time as may be mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, may impose such conditions, including additional time extensions not to exceed two (2) additional years, as may   Planning Commission 1 – 23 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 425 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 12 of 49 be deemed necessary for the compatibility of such nonconformity with adjacent properties. d. Appeals. Appeals shall be filed in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 4. Failure to Comply with Hearing Officer’s Determination. Failure to comply with the Hearing Officer’s determination to discontinue a nonconforming use or structure shall constitute a violation of this Chapter and is subject to fines and enforcement provisions of Sec. 1-8 of the SAMC. 5. Failure to Terminate Use at Conclusion of Amortization Period. The failure to terminate a nonconforming use at the conclusion of an approved amortization period shall be deemed a public nuisance in accordance with California Government Code, Section 38771. The City is hereby authorized to abate the nuisance in accordance with Chapter 17 of this Code or may pursue any alternative remedy to abate the use authorized by this Code or State law. d. Additional Administrative Policies and Procedures. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, may enact and shall publish any additional administrative policies and procedures to effectuate the purposes of this Chapter, including, but not limited to, administrat ive policies and procedures to govern the selection of a neutral hearing officer and the conduct of hearings for the Establishment of Amortization Periods in order to implement the provisions of this Article. (7) Abatement. The provisions of this Section are in addition to authority existing under State law to declare and abate a public nuisance pursuant to California law and other applicable provisions of the SAMC. In the event that a legal nonconforming structure or use is found to constitute a public nuisan ce, appropriate and alternative action may be taken by the City pursuant to Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the SAMC and Article VIII (Enforcement) of this Chapter). (8) Exception. The provisions of this section shall not apply to multifamily dwellings damaged or destroyed by fire in accordance with Government Code Section 65852.2. (9) Voluntary Compliance Agreement. The Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee, is hereby authorized to enter into a Voluntary Compliance Agreement with a business owner or property owner in order to establish terms for compliance with the provisions of this Article.” Section 6. Section 41-2004 (The Industrial Overlay I-OZ) Zone) of Chapter 41 of the SAMC is hereby amended to read as follows:   Planning Commission 1 – 24 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 426 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 13 of 49 “Sec. 41-2004 Reserved. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone (a) The Industrial Overlay Zone (I-OZ) is applied to areas zoned M1 or M2 and occupied with an industrial use at the time of the adoption of this Article. The zoning for the individual parcels shall be determined by Sectional District Map number 7- 5-9 as it appeared on May 1, 2010. (b) The I-OZ allows the M1 and M2 regulations to apply to said parcel until such time as the property owner applies to modify the zoning district. The Regulating Plan identifies the boundaries of the applicable zoning district (i.e. Transit Village, Urban Center, Corridor, Urban Neighborhood 1 or Urban Neighborhood 2) within the Transit Zoning Code. (c) A property owner may apply to develop the parcel consistent with the applicable zoning district within the Transit Zoning Code. The applicant shall receive all the necessary site approvals including, the approval of the overlay zone site plan pursuant to Article III, Division 28 prior to development. (d) The uses in the I-OZ shall be subject to the regulations of the M1 and M2 zones (SAMC 41, Article III, Divisions 18 and 19), as applicable.” Section 7. Section 41-2005 (Application for Discretionary Approvals) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2005. Application for Discretionary Approvals (a) Site Plan Review shall mean specific development plan and shall comply with Sections 41-593.4 through 41-593.6. Sections 41-593.4 through 41-593.6 shall only apply to structures over four (4) stories in height. (b) Conditional use permits, variances and minor exceptions. Conditional use permits, variances and minor exceptions shall be subject to Article V of this Chapter, except for the permit thresholds for minor exceptions shall be as identified in Table 1B of this Article. (c) Effect of amendments to this Article on applications in progress shall apply as follows: (1) Discretionary Applications Submitted and Determined Complete. All discretionary permit applications that are active and that have been determined to be complete before the effective date of the Article or any amendment, shall be processed in compliance with the requirements in effect when the application was deemed complete, and pursuant to all requirements of Sections 41-2008 and 41-2009. (2) Approved Projects Not Yet Under Construction. Any structure authorized by a discretionary permit or approval of a land use as allowed by this Article for which a Building Permit application has been submitted or a Building Permit   Planning Commission 1 – 25 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 427 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 14 of 49 has been issued may be constructed in compliance with the permit or approval, as long as construction is completed and the approved land use is established before the expiration of the permit or, where applicable, before the expiration of any approved time extension. (3) Project Under Construction. A project for which a Building Permit has been issued may be continued and completed in compliance with the plans and specifications upon which the permit was issued.” Section 8. Section 41-2006 (Zones Established) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended, including the replacement of Figure 2.1, to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2006. Zones Established (a) Purpose. This section establishes the zones app lied to property within the plan area by the Regulating Plan. The Regulating Plan divides the plan area into separate zones that are based on a transect of intensity within the plan area that ranges from the most urban types of development and land use to the least urban types, with most zones providing for a significant mixture of land uses within them. This approach differs from conventional zoning maps that typically divide cities into zones that rigidly segregate residential, commercial, industrial, an d institutional uses into separate areas, and thereby require residents to drive for nearly all daily activities. The use of zones based on development intensity (instead of land use zones) as the spatial basis for regulating development, directly reflects the functions of, and interrelationships between, each part of the plan area. The zones also effectively implement the City’s urban design objectives for each part of the plan area, to establish and maintain attractive distinctions between each zone. This is why some parcels are zoned with more than one zone. In such cases, the zoning is divided along a clear boundary such as the middle of a block. The zones of this Regulating Plan allocate architectural types, frontage types, and land uses within the plan area, as well as providing detailed standards for building placement, height and profile. The diagram to the right Figure 2.1 identifies the eight (8) 9 zones applied within the plan area as they relate to existing rights -of- way and parcels. (b) Zones established. The following zones are applicable to this specific plan, and applied to property within the boundary as shown on the Regulating Plan. (1) Transit Village (TV) Zone. The Transit Village zone is intended to provide standards for compact transit - supportive mixed-use/residential development. This zone is characterized by a wide range of building intensity, including mixed-use tower-on-podium buildings, flex blocks, liners, stacked flats, and courtyard housing. The zone accommodates retail, restaurant, entertainment, and other pedestrian-oriented uses at street level, with offices and flats above in the mixed -use building types, at high intensities and densities. The landscape palette is urban, with shading   Planning Commission 1 – 26 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 428 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 15 of 49 and accent street trees in parkway strips along Santa Ana Boulevard, and in sidewalk tree wells where on-street parking is provided. Parking is accommodated on-street, in structures with liner buildings, and underground. (2) Government Center (GC) Zone. This area accommodates a wide variety of civic uses, including Federal, State, and local government offices and services, libraries, museums, community centers, and other civic assembly facilities and is identified, but not regulated, by this Article. Refer to City requirements as identified in SAMC Chapter 41. Building types vary according to their public purpose, are programmed by the various government agencies for their specific sites, and therefore are not coded by this Article the Transit Zoning Code (SD84A and SD84B). The landscape style is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells, and in landscaped public plazas. (3) Downtown (DT) Zone. This zone is applied to the historical shopping district of Santa Ana, a vital, pedestrian-oriented area that is defined by multi-story urban building types (flex blocks, live-work, stacked dwellings, and courtyard housing in the Downtown edges) accommodating a mixture of retail, office, light service, and residential uses. The standards of this zone are intended to reinforce the form and character represented by pre-World War II buildings and recognized as a National Historic District, through restoration, rehabilitation, and context- sensitive infill. The standards also facilitate the replacement or improvement of post-war development that eliminated the pedestrian orientation of various downtown blocks (for example, parking structures with no features of pedestrian interest along their entire lengths). The landscape st yle is urban, emphasizing shading and accent street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on-street and may also be in structures with liner buildings, underground, and within block centers in surface lots not visible from streets. (4) Urban Center (UC) Zone. This zone is applied to the area surrounding the Downtown, which serves as a transitional area to the surrounding lower intensity neighborhoods and to other areas where mixed-use and multi-unit residential buildings create a pedestrian- oriented urban fabric. The zone provides for a variety of non -residential uses and a mix of housing types at medium intensities and densities. Besides accommodating community serving businesses, this zone may also serve the daily convenience shopping and service needs of nearby residents. Building types include mixed-use Flex Blocks, stacked flats, live-work, row- houses, and courtyard housing. The landscape is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on -street and may also be in structures with liner buildings and underground in areas adjacent to the DT zone, and in surface lots away from street frontages. (5) Corridor (CDR) Zone. This zone is applied to properties fronting existing commercial corridors and provides standards to improve pedestrian-orientation in a transit-supportive, mixed-use area. Mixed-use flex block and live-work building types are at or   Planning Commission 1 – 27 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 429 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 16 of 49 near the sidewalk, and accommodate street level retail, service, and office uses, with office and residential above. The landscape style is urban, emphasizing shading street trees in sidewalk tree wells. Parking is accommodated on-street, and in screened surface lots between buildings, or away from streets, with no more than half the site frontage occupied by parking. (6) Urban Neighborhood 2 (UN-2) Zone. This zone is applied to primarily residential areas intended to accommodate a variety of housing types, with some opportunities for live -work, neighborhood- serving retail, and cafes. Appropriate building types include single dwellings, duplexes, triplexes and quadplexes, courtyard housing, rowhouses, and live - work. In some areas, the more intense, hybrid court building type is allowed where additional intensity is warranted while maintaining compatibility with neighboring properties (see Regulating Plan). The landscape is appropriate to a neighborhood, with shading street trees in parkway strips, and shallow- depth landscaped front yards separating buildings from sidewalks. Parking is on - street, and in garages located away from street frontages. (7) Urban Neighborhood 1 (UN-1) Zone. This zone is applied to existing primarily residential areas and is intended to strengthen and stabilize the low intensity nature of these neighborhoods. Appropriate building types include single dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes, and live-work. The landscape is appropriate to a neighborhood, with shading street trees in parkway strips and landscaped front yards separating buildings from sidewalks. Parking is on-street, and in garages located away from street frontages. (8) Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone. The I-OZ is applied to areas currently zoned M1 or M2, and occupied with an industrial use, to allow the types of land use activity and development permitted by existing M1 and M2 zoning to continue until such time that the owner chooses to apply the new zones identified in Figure 2.1. In order to determine if the M1 or M2 land use activity and development apply to a particular parcel, the I-OZ is further identified as I-OZ-M1 or I-OZ-M2. Until the property owner applies to modify the zoning district, property in the I-OZ shall be regulated by the provisions of the M1 and M2 zones (SAMC 41, Article III, Divisions 18 and 19), as applicable. (8) (9) Open Space (O) Zone. This zone identifies areas reserved for community parks and other open spaces and is identified, but not regulated, by this Article. Refer to City requirements as identified in SAMC Chapter 41. Allowable structures in this zone are limited to those necessary to support the specific purposes of the particular open space area (e.g., sport-court enclosures and multi-purpose buildings in active parks, and trails within passive parks).” Figure 2.1 Regulating Plan with Existing R.O.W.   Planning Commission 1 – 28 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 430 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 17 of 49   Planning Commission 1 – 29 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 431 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 18 of 49 Figure 2.1 Regulating Plan with Existing R.O.W. Section 9. Section 41-2007 (Uses Permitted) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2007. Uses Permitted. (a) Allowable Land Use Types. A parcel or building within the Specific Development SD-84 area shall be occupied by only the land uses allowed by the table entitled Use Standards (hereinafter Use Standards Table) within the zone applied to the site by the Regulating Plan. (b) No building shall be erected, constructed, reconstructed or structurally altered except in conformance with the provisions contained herein; nor shall any building or land be used for any purpose other than that which is permitted in the district or modified district in which such building or land is located. All u ses, as defined in this Article, not expressly permitted in any district enumerated in Table 2A, are prohibited. (b) (c) Garage sales are allowed in compliance with Section 41-193. (c) (d) Temporary outdoor activities are allowed in compliance with Section 41-195.5. (d) (e) Youth amusement rides are permitted in compliance with Section 41 -366 for C1 districts.   Planning Commission 1 – 30 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 432 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 19 of 49 (e) (f) Drive-through facilities shall not be permitted. (g) The conversion of existing structures containing residential land uses to non - residential land uses is prohibited in the UN-1 and UN-2 zones. Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RESIDENTIAL Live-Work Use / Joint living-working quarters P (2) P (2) P (2) P (2) CUP CUP Care Homes CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Single Dwelling --- --- --- --- P P Multi-Family Dwellings P (1) P (1) P (1) P (1) P P Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RECREATION, EDUCATION AND ASSEMBLY Community assembly P (1) P (1) P (1) P CUP CUP Health/fitness facility P P P P CUP --- Library, museum P P P P P CUP Schools P (1) P (1) P (1) P CUP CUP Studio P P P P CUP CUP Trade School P (1) P (1) P (1) P (1) CUP --- Theater, cinema or performing arts P P P P CUP --- Commercial Recreation (Indoor) up to 5,000 square feet maximum floor area per tenant CUP P CUP P CUP P --- --- P --- Commercial Recreation (Indoor) > 5,000 square feet floor area per tenant CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 RETAIL General retail, except with any of the following features P P P P P (2) --- • Floor area over 20,000 per tenant CUP CUP P --- CUP ---   Planning Commission 1 – 31 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 433 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 20 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Artisan/craft product – limited on-site production CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Eating establishments P P P P P (2) --- Auto or motor vehicle service --- --- P P --- --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SERVICE GENERAL Banquet facility/catering-sub. to 41.199.1(a) through (d) CUP CUP CUP CUP (1) CUP --- Child day Day care center P (3) P (3) P P CUP CUP Adult day care center-subject to 41.199.2 of the SAMC P (3) P (3) P P P --- Hotel, excludes transient residential hotel and long-term stay P P P P --- --- Mortuaries, funeral homes --- --- CUP P --- --- Personal services P P P P P (2) P (2) Personal services - restricted --- --- CUP CUP CUP --- Pet day care facility CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP --- Tattoo/Body Art Establishments - subject to 41.199.3 of the SAMC P P P P --- --- Craft and specialized automotive restoration service --- P P P CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SERVICES-BUSINESS-FINANCIAL-PROFESSIONAL-TECHNOLOGY Bank, financial services P P P P --- --- Business support service P P P P P (2) P (2)   Planning Commission 1 – 32 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 434 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 21 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Clinic, urgent care --- --- CUP P --- --- Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc., office P (1) P (1) P (1) P --- --- Extended Care P P P P CUP --- Laboratory – medical – analytical --- P (1) P (1) P --- CUP --- Media production – office or storefront type (no soundstage) P P P (1) --- P --- Professional / administrative/service office P (1) P (1) P (1) P P (2) P (2) Research and development P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 SMALL SCALE INDUSTRY Artisan/craft product manufacturing CUP CUP CUP --- CUP --- Furniture and fixture manufacturing, cabinet shop P (3) --- P (3) --- --- --- Laboratory - medical - analytical --- P (1) P (1) P --- --- Manufacturing - light P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Media production - office or storefront type (no sound stage) P P P (1) --- --- --- Printing and publishing --- P (1) P --- --- --- Research and development P (3) --- P (3) --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION, INFRASTRUCTURE Helistops CUP CUP --- --- --- ---   Planning Commission 1 – 33 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 435 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 22 of 49 Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 Parking facility - public or commercial, inclusive of ancillary recharging spaces for electric vehicles P P P P --- --- Transit station or terminal CUP --- --- CUP --- --- Public utility structure, excluding wireless communication facilities --- --- --- --- CUP --- Table 2A – Use Standards Land Use Type Permit Required by Zone TV DT UC CDR UN-2 UN-1 MISCELLANEOUS Any structure over four (4) stories in height SPR SPR SPR SPR SPR --- Businesses operating between 12 and 7 am CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Alcoholic beverage sales or consumption CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP --- Expansion of existing, legally established self - storage facility --- --- --- --- CUP --- Drive-thru facility --- --- --- --- --- --- Section 10. Section 41-2008 (Operational Standards) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:   Planning Commission 1 – 34 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 436 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 23 of 49 “Sec. 41-2008. Operational Standards (a) All property shall be maintained in a safe, sanitary and attractive condition including, but not limited to, structures, landscaping, parking areas, walkways, and trash enclosures. (b) All business activities shall be conducted and located within an enclosed building, except as allowed by Section 41-195 of the SAMC and except that the following business activities may be conducted outside of an enclosed building: (1) Newsstands (2) Flower Stands (c) There shall be no manufacturing, processing, compounding, assembling or treatment of any material or product., other than that which is clearly incidental to a particular retail and ser- vice general enterprise, and where such goods are sold on the premises. (d) There shall be no work inside of a structure that generates noise that exceeds 60 dB CNEL measured at the exterior wall of the individual tenant unit of a structure. (e) Storage of goods and supplies shall be limited to those sold at retail on the premises or utilized in the course of business. (f) Public utility structures, including electric distribution and transmission substations shall be screened by a solid wall at least eight (8) feet high, except as restricted by Sections 36-45, 36-46, and 36-47. (g) Any activity permitted shall be conducted in such a manner as not to have a detrimental effect on permitted adjacent uses by reason of refuse matter, noise, light, or vibration. (h) Small scale industry Artisan/craft product - limited on site production and research and development land uses shall require a solid wall or fence not less than eight (8) feet in height along any rear or side lot line. (i) All business activities, including, but not limited to, compounding, processing, packaging or assembly of articles of merchandise and treatment of products shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building. No ancillary vehicle maintenance or repair shall be allowed on site. (j) Loading areas shall not be visible from streets. Loading areas not facing a street shall be setback at least thirty-five (35) feet from the property line. (k) No business activity that generates noise or vibration shall be conducted between 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. Saturday and Sunday.   Planning Commission 1 – 35 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 437 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 24 of 49 (l) Automobile servicing uses including nonconforming establishments, shall comply with the following operational standards: (1) No automobile servicing shall be conducted before 7:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and before 10:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. No servicing shall be conducted on Sundays. (2) All work shall be conducted inside an enclosed structure. (3) Outdoor or overnight vehicle storage is not permitted.” Section 11. Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby added in its entirety to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2009. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses. (a) In addition to the operational standards listed in Sec. 41 -2008, the following shall apply to nonconforming industrial uses: (1) The purpose of these operational standards is to protect and improve the living and working environment, the appearance of the community, reduce or eliminate nuisance conditions, and minimize the impacts of industrial uses on adjacent properties. (2) These standards are in addition to the operational standards established in Sec. 41-2008 and shall apply to all nonco nforming industrial uses, including those existing industrial uses that become nonconforming at the effective date of any implementing ordinance. (3) Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in a manner creating any dangerous, injurious, or noxious fire, explosive or other hazard that would adversely affect the surrounding area. (4) If any nonconforming use that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to: frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints relating to the nonconforming use; or is not in good standing with the City, including, but not limited to violations of Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code or public nuisances as defined and addressed by Chapter 17 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including initiating a hearing to consider business license revocation and/or terminating utility services or connections. For the purposes of this section, “frequent” is defined as more than one (1) violation, call, or complaint per month during any twelve (12) month period, and “constant service calls” is defined as more than one (1) service call per month relating to or arising from the nonconforming use during any twelve (12) month period   Planning Commission 1 – 36 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 438 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 25 of 49 (b) Enclosed Operations. (1) All business activities, including, but not limited to, compounding, processing, packaging, or assembly of articles of merchandise and treatment of products shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building. (2) No automobile service or repair of any kind shall be allowed outdoors on site. (c) Air Emissions and Dust (1) No land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere. (2) Uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emit dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. Sources of air emissions shall comply with all rules established by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40), the California Air Resources Board, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. (d) Light, Glare, and Heat (1) No direct or indirect glare or heat, whether from floodlight s or from high- temperature processes (including combustion or welding or otherwise) shall be visible or felt at the property line. (2) To ensure that industrial development does not create light and glare nuisances, the following performance standards shall be observed: a. Lighting must be shielded, boxed, or directed at a downward angle so as to minimize the generation of light and glare and to ensure that there is no spillover of light and glare that will impact drivers or pedestrians on the public streets, on-site activities, and adjoining or nearby properties. b. No activity shall be permitted which causes excessive light and glare to be transmitted or reflected to surrounding properties at a level resulting in detrimental impacts to adjacent properties as dete rmined by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or designee. (3) Light sources shall generally not be permitted in landscaped, buffer, or setback areas except for those illuminating pedestrian walkways. Lighting used to illuminate parking areas shall be designed, located, and installed to be shielded and down-lit and to reflect away from any nearby residential areas. Lighting for advertising signs shall not create glare or light which extends to surrounding properties. (4) No use shall be operated such that significant, direct glare, incidental to the operation of the use, is visible beyond the boundaries of the lot where the use is located.   Planning Commission 1 – 37 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 439 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 26 of 49 (e) Ground Vibration (1) No use shall generate ground vibration perceptible without instruments at any point along the property line of the site except for motor vehicle operations. (2) No vibration shall be produced that is transmitted through the ground and is discernible without the aid of instruments by a reasonable person at the property lines of the site. Vibrations from temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that enter and leave the subject parcel are exempt from this standard. (f) Storage and Screening (1) No material or waste shall be deposited upon a subject parcel in such form or manner that it may be transferred off the parcel by natural causes or forces. (2) All materials or wastes which might cause fumes or dust, or which constitute a fire hazard, or which may be edible by or otherwise be attractive to rodents or insects shall be stored outdoors only in closed containers. (g) Hazardous Materials (1) Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in any manner so as to create any fire, explosive or other hazard. All activities involving the use or storage of combustible, explosive, caustic, or otherwise hazardous materials shall comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal safety standards and shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fire and explosion, and adequate firefighting and fire suppression equipme nt in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations. The burning of waste materials in open fires without written approval of the Fire Department is prohibited. (2) No activities shall be permitted which emit dangerous radioactivity at any point nor shall electrical disturbances which adversely affect the operation of any equipment, other than that of the creator of such disturbances, be allowed. (3) No use, activity or process shall cause electromagnetic interference with normal radio and television reception, or with the function of other electronic equipment beyond the property line of the site in which it is situated. All uses, activities and processes shall comply with applicable Federal Communications Commission regulations. (h) Liquid and Solid Waste (1) Liquid or solid wastes discharged from the premises shall be properly treated prior to discharge so as not to contaminate or pollute any watercourse or groundwater supply or interfere with bacterial processes in sewage treatment.   Planning Commission 1 – 38 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 440 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 27 of 49 (2) The disposal or dumping of solid wastes, such as slag, paper and fiber wastes, or other industrial wastes, is prohibited. (3) Wastes shall be handled and stored so as to prevent nuisances, health, safety, and fire hazards, and to facilitate recycling subject to the review and oversight of the Fire Department. Closed containers shall be provided and used for the storage of any materials which by their nature are combustible, volatile, dust, or odor producing or edible or attractive to rodents, vermin, or insects. (i) Site Maintenance. All industrial land uses shall be maintained in compliance with Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and not constitute public nuisances as defined and addressed by Chapter 17 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code at all times and consistent with project conditions of approval (if applicable). (j) Truck Parking and Loading (1) All truck parking areas must be on paved surfaces. The parking, loading or unloading of trucks associated with a business on public streets is prohibited. (2) Trucks idling is prohibited. (3) All truck parking and loading areas shall be maintained in good condition as determined by the City. Annual inspections may be conducted by the City to ensure compliance. Any violation or failure to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter shall be deemed a nuisance. (k) Hours of Operation (1) For non-conforming industrial uses which are directly across a street from or abutting residential uses or structures, hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. (2) No operating hours are permitted on Sundays, or Federal Holidays.” Section 12. Section 41-2080 (Definitions) of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: “Sec. 41-2080 - Definitions The words and phrases, shall be construed as defined in this Article, unless from the context a different meaning is intended or unless a different meaning is specifically defined and more particularly directed to the use of such words or phrases. The words used in the present tense include the future tense, and words in the singular number include the plural number. If any of the definitions in this section conflict with definitio ns in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), these definitions shall control for the purposes of this Article. If any term herein is not defined by this subsection, the definitions contained within Division 2 (Definitions) of Article I of Chapter 41 of the SAMC shall apply.   Planning Commission 1 – 39 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 441 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 28 of 49 1. Access (Direct): The physical pedestrian entrance to a unit that is provided directly from the street or courtyard. Also described as walk-up access. 2. Access (Point): The physical pedestrian entrance to a unit that is provided through a common space, such as a lobby or corridor that connects directly to the street or courtyard. Also described as non-walk-up access. 3. Accessory Structure: An accessory structure or building is a detached building or structure, or part of a building or structure, which is incidental or subordinate to the main building, structure or use on the same lot or parcel of land, without cooking facilities (e.g., storage shed, garage, gazebo), and is used exclusively by the occupant of the main building. 4. Alley: An alley is any public or private thoroughfare for the use of pedestrians or vehicles, not less than ten (10) feet nor more than thirty (30) feet in width, and is intended for service and only a secondary means of access to abu tting properties. 5. Arcade: see ‘Frontage Types’ 6. Artisan/craft product manufacturing - limited on-site production: The manufacturing of products primarily by hand by persons trained in an artistic skill, including ceramics, pottery, glass blowing, or sculptures. A specialized commercial facility with a retail-facing operation open to the public. Products are typically made by hand or with a restricted level of automation demonstrating an artistic skill. On -site production of artisan/craft product activities include design, production, processing, printing, assembly, treatment, testing, repair, and packaging, as well as any incidental storage. Typical artisan/craft products include, but are not limited to, electronics, food products, furniture-making, beverages, leather products, clocks and watches, jewelry, clothing/apparel, metal work, furniture and fine woodworking, glass, ceramics, paper and paper products, soaps, perfumes, and lotions, together with ancillary training and/or educational program activities. 7. Attic: The area found directly below the roof of a building and the ceiling of the top floor. The attic shall be an uninhabitable area. 8. Automobile repair: Automobile repair is the repair of motor vehicles, including the repair or replacement of engines and transmissions, body and fender repair, and the installation of non-factory installed products except those permissible through automobile servicing as defined herein. 9. Automobile service or Automobile servicing: Automobile service or automobile servicing is the servicing and minor repair of motor vehicles, including the replacement of belts, hoses, batteries, tires, shock absorbers, oil and air filters, chassis lubrication, air conditioning servicing, wheel alignments, replacement of brake pads, and engine tune-ups. 10. Bank, financial institution: An establishment for the custody, loan, exchange or issue of money, for the extension of credit, and for facilitating the transmission of   Planning Commission 1 – 40 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 442 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 29 of 49 funds. Excludes check cashers as defined by California Civil Code secti on 1789.31. 11. Basement: That portion of a building between floor and ceiling which is either totally or partly below grade and in compliance with the definition of basement established in the California Building Code (CBC). 12. Block: An area of land within a subdivision which area is entirely bounded by streets, highways or ways, excepts alley and the exterior boundary of the subdivision. 13. Building Height: The vertical extent of a building measured in stories to the eave of the highest story, not including a basement or an attic. Height limits do not apply to masts, belfries, clock towers, steeples, equipment screening, chimney flues, and similar structures. Building height shall be measured from the average grade of the fronting thoroughfare curb level. 14. Building Placement: The maximum horizontal envelope available for placing a building on a lot. 15. Building Type: A structure defined by the combination of configuration and placement. The building types used in this Article are listed below: a. Bungalow Court: A configuration of freestanding single units arranged around a common, shared courtyard that is wholly open to the street. The individual buildings are arranged next to each other to form the bungalow court building type. b. Courtyard Housing: A building type consisting of residences that can be arranged in four possible configurations: townhouses, townhouses over flats, flats, and flats over flats. The structures are arranged next to each other, on one or more courts that are partly or wholly open to the street. c. Duplex, Triplex, and Quadplex: Multiple dwelling forms that are architecturally presented as large single-family houses in their typical neighborhood setting. d. Flex Block: A building generally of a single massing e lement, designed for occupancy by retail, service, or office uses on the ground floor, with upper floors also configured for those uses or for residences. e. House: A structure occupied by a single household that also accommodates commercial and office uses as allowed. f. Hybrid Court: A building that combines the point-access portion of the stacked dwelling building type (double-loaded corridor element) with the walk-up portion of the courtyard housing building type.   Planning Commission 1 – 41 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 443 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 30 of 49 g. Lined Block: A building that conceals a public garage or other faceless building that is designed for occupancy by retail, service, or office uses on the ground floor, with upper floors also configured for those uses or for residences. h. Live/Work: An integrated residence and working space, occupie d and utilized by a single household in an arrangement of at least 3 such structures or 1 multiple structure with a least 3 units arranged side by side along the primary frontage, that has been designed or structurally modified to accommodate joint residential occupancy and work activity. i. Rowhouse: An individual structure on a parcel with a private rear yard and individual garage accessed from an alley. Such structure shall be developed in an arrangement of at least 3 such structures along the primary fron tage. Or, a structure of at least 3 attached townhouse unit types arranged side by side with a private rear yard and individual garage accessed from an alley along the primary frontage. j. Stacked Dwellings: A building of single-floor or multi-floor residences of similar configuration either above or below that are stacked. k. Tower-on-Podium: A multi-level building organized around a central core with the first two to five floors expressed as a podium building. l. Tuck-Under Housing: An individual structure on a parcel with no rear yard, where its garage is tucked under the rear of the house and accessed from an alley. Such structure shall be developed with at least four such individual structures, or a structure of at least four attached townhouse units types arranged side by side along the primary frontage. 16. Bungalow Court: See 'Building Types' 17. Business support service. Commercial establishment that provides services to other businesses including maintenance, repair and service, testing, rental, etc. including the following examples: a. Computer-related services (rental/repair) b. Copying and quick printing services c. Film processing and photofinishing (retail) d. Graphic design services e. Mailing and mail box services f. Security systems services 18. Clinic, Urgent Care: A facility other than a hospital where medical, mental health, surgical or other personal health services are provided on an outpatient basis, including incidental medical laboratories. Examples of these uses include: a. mMedical offices with five or more licensed practitioners or medical specialties   Planning Commission 1 – 42 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 444 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 31 of 49 b. oOut-patient care facilities, urgent care facilities. c. Counseling services by other than medical doctors or psychiatrists are included under "Offices - Professional/Administrative." 19. Community Assembly: Group gatherings conducted indoors such as synagogues, mosques, temples, churches, community centers, bingo halls, private clubs, fraternal, philanthropic and charitable organizations and lodges. 20. Commercial Recreation Facility - Indoor: Establishments providing indoor amusement and entertainment services for a fee or admission charge, including: a. Bowling alleys, Tossing or Throwing Games, Indoor Sports b. Coin-operated amusement arcades c. Electronic game arcades (video games, etc.) Pool, billiards d. Skating sports (ice, roller, board), Escape Room, Mystery Games This use does not include adult businesses. Four or more electronic games or coin - operated amusements in any establishment, or a premises where 50 percent or more of the floor area is occupied by amusement devices, are considered an electronic game arcade as described above; three or fewer machines are not considered a land use separate from the primary use of the site. Ancillary uses include meeting rooms, snack bars, and equipment rental or sales are permitted within an indoor recreation facility, provided that their gross floor area of the ancillary use does not exceed twenty percent (20%). Ancillary uses shall operate in conjunction with the primary recreation use, and shall maintain the same or fewer hours of operation. 21. Commercial Frontage: The non-residential frontage of a building. Non-residential activities subject to city approval are allowed within this space, which must be at least 25 feet in depth. These spaces are limited to the first floor and as such, have different building requirements than upper floors (e.g., large storefront windows, signage, etc.). 22. Courtyard Housing: See 'Building Types' 23. Craft and specialized automotive restoration service: A specialized bus iness or commercial enterprise occurring inside of a fully-enclosed structure that focuses on repairing and restoring older cars, often considered "collector cars" as defined by the State; which includes (1) a vehicle model 35+ years old, (2) a vehicle model 25+ years old with historic plates, or (3) a vehicle model classified as a special interest vehicle. Such restoration services return these types of vehicles to their original condition, including mechanical components, bodywork, and interior, aiming to preserve their historical authenticity and aesthetic appeal. The vehicle must not be altered from the manufacturer's original specifications or considered a "kit" car.   Planning Commission 1 – 43 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 445 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 32 of 49 24. Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc. office: A facility other than a hospital where medical, dental, mental health, surgical, and/or other personal health care ser - vices are provided on an outpatient basis, and that accommodates no more than four licensed primary practitioners (for example, chiropractors, medical doctors, psychiatrists, etc., other than nursing staff) within an individual office suite. 25. Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex: See 'Building Types' 26. Dwelling Unit Types: a. Apartment: A rental version of a Flat, Loft, or Townhouse. b. Condominium: An ownership version of a Flat, Loft or Townhouse c. Flat: A single-story unit. d. Loft: A double-story height unit with a mezzanine. e. Townhouse: A two to three-story unit. 27. Elevation (Building): The exterior walls of a building. Also referred to as 'Facade' when the elevation is along a frontage line. 28. Entrance (Main or Primary): The principal point of access of pedestrians to a building. In the support of pedestrian activity, the main or primary entrance should be oriented to the frontage rather than to the parking. Extended Care: Residential facilities providing nursing and health-related care as a primary use with in-patient beds. Examples of these uses include: board and care homes; convalescent and rest homes; extended care facilities; and skilled nursing facilities. Long-term personal care facilities that do not emphasize medical treatment are included under "Care Homes." 29. Facade: The exterior wall of a building that is set along a frontage line. Facades support the public realm and are subject to frontage requirements additional to those required of elevations. 30. Flex Block: See 'Building Types' Forecourt: See ‘Frontage Types’ 31. Frontage Line: Those lot lines that coincide with a public street line. One shall be designated as the Principal Frontage Line. Facades along Frontage Lines define the public realm and are therefore more highly regulated than the elevations that coincide with other lot lines. Frontage lines are subject to the urban standards, architectural standards, signage standards, and subdivision standards. 32. Frontage Type: The architectural element of a building between the public right- of-way and the private property associated with the building. Frontage Types combined with the public realm create the perceptible streetscape. The following frontage types used in this Article are listed below: a. Arcade: A facade with an attached colonnade, that is covered by upper stories. This frontage type is ideal for retail use, but only when the sidewalk is fully absorbed within the arcade so that a pedestrian cannot bypass it.   Planning Commission 1 – 44 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 446 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 33 of 49 For Building Code considerations, this frontage type cannot cover the public right- of-way. b. Forecourt: A semi-public exterior space partially within the shopfront, gallery or arcade frontage that is partially surrounded by a building and also opening to a thoroughfare forming a court. The court is suitable for gardens, outdoor dining, vehicular drop-off and utility off-loading. c. Front yard / Porch: A common frontage type associated with single family houses, where the facade is set back from the right of way with a front yard. A porch may also be appended to the facade. A fence or wall at the property line may be used to define the private space of the yard. The front yard may also be raised from the sidewalk, creating a small retaining wall at the property line with entry steps to the yard. d. Gallery: A colonnade that is attached to storefronts and projects over the sidewalk. e. Shopfront: A facade placed at or close to the right-of-way line, with the entrance at sidewalk grade. This frontage type is conventional for retail front- age and is commonly equipped with cantilevered shed roof(s) or awning(s). Recessed storefronts are also acceptable. The absence of a raised ground floor precludes residential use on the ground floor facing the street, although such use is appropriate above. f. Stoop: An elevated entry porch that corresponds directly to the building entry, with stairs placed close to the frontage line on a building with the ground story elevated from the sidewalk, securing privacy for the win dows and front rooms. This type is suitable for ground -floor residential uses with short set- backs. This type may be interspersed with the shopfront frontage type. A porch or shed roof may also cover the stoop. 33. Front yard/Porch: See 'Frontage Types' Furniture and Fixture Manufacturing, cabinet shop: The manufacture or assembly of high-grade articles of furniture and fixtures calling for fine finish, such as decorative cabinets, desks and chairs, store fixtures and office equipment. In the production of such goods, noise above 60 dB CNEL beyond the walls of the building is prohibited. 34. Gallery: see ‘Frontage Types’ 35. General Retail: Stores and shops selling many lines of merchandise. Examples of these stores and lines of merchandise include: a. art galleries, retail b. art supplies, including framing services bicycles c. books, magazines, and newspapers cameras and photographic supplies clothing, shoes, and accessories department stores   Planning Commission 1 – 45 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 447 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 34 of 49 d. drug stores and pharmacies dry goods e. fabrics and sewing supplies f. florists and houseplant stores with indoor sales only hobby materials g. furniture and home decor stores h. hardware and building supply stores i. jewelry j. luggage and leather goods k. musical instruments (small), parts and accessories, l. Large instruments are under "Furniture, Furnishings, and Appliance Store" m. orthopedic supplies small wares specialty shops n. sporting goods and equipment stationery o. toys and games variety stores p. videos, DVDs, records, CDs, including rental stores General retail does not include the following: a. Adult business as defined in section 41-1701.6 of the SAMC, antique or collectible stores, furniture, furnishings and appliance stores, medical marijuana dispensaries or second-hand stores. b. Sheet metal shops, body-fender works, automobile paint shops, repair garages, and any activity which includes the processing, treatment, manufacturing, assembling or compounding of any product, other than that which is clearly and traditionally incidental and essential to a particular retail activity. c. Any use which is more specifically identified as a permitted use or as a use which may be permitted subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit or land use certificate in one or more use districts pursuant to this code. 36. Ground Floor/ Footprint: The area resulting from the application of building placement and open space requirements and as further articulated by particular building design. In calculating the area, only the conditioned floor space shall be counted for purposes of calculating allowable upper floor area, the area occupied by zaguans shall be counted as "ground floor/footprint." 37. Ground Floor Residential: Dwellings with their primary entrance and habitable space at grade. 38. Health and Fitness: A commercial establishment providing facilities for aerobic exercises, running and jogging, exercise equipment, game courts, swimming facilities, and saunas, showers and lockers. Health and fitness facilities may also provide for instruction programs and classes, such as martial arts, yoga where lockers and showers are provided. 39. Hotel (land use): A facility offering short-term lodging accommodations, as defined and regulated by the SAMC, to the general public and which may include additional facilities and services, such as restaurants, meeting rooms, entertainment, personal services and recreational facilities. Access to the guest rooms shall be   Planning Commission 1 – 46 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 448 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 35 of 49 through the main lobby of the building. A hotel shall contain more than 5 guest rooms. A hotel that contains a kitchen as defined by the California Building Code (CBC) in guest rooms shall be deemed to be a long term stay business hotel as defined by the SAMC. A hotel that meets the criteria of a transient/residential hotel as defined by the SAMC, shall be deemed to be a transient/residential hotel . 40. House: See 'Building Types' 41. House Scale: Multi-family building form that is derivative of and compatible with surrounding single-family houses and that can be applied in 1 to 4 direct-access assemblies of units to form larger buildings from duplex up to and including Courtyard Housing. 42. Hybrid Court: See 'Building Types' 43. Laboratory- medical-analytical: A place equipped for experimentation or observation in a field of study, or devoted to the application of scientific principles in testing and analysis. Quantities of biological or hazardous materials used in situ, shall be limited to those quantities established by the fire department Light Manufacturing: The manufacture or assembly of products from previously treated material where no impact is created to the adjacent uses and no hazardous materials are used in the production of such products. The maximum number of employees shall be 10. Examples of light manufacturing include: athletic equipment bakeries camera, photo equipment clothing electronics musical instruments optical goods woodworking (limited) 44. Lined Block: See 'Building Types' Live/Work: See 'Building Types' 45. Lot Width: The frontage of a parcel which is used to identify the parcel for street address purposes. 46. Media production: An establishment dedicated to the production of visual and audio mass media, including television, films, videos, video games, mobile devices, internet and digital interactive media, but excludes magazines, newspapers, and periodicals. 47. Mixed-Use Building: A structure lawfully containing residential and non -residential uses. 48. Multi-Family Building: A residential structure lawfully containing two or more dwelling units.   Planning Commission 1 – 47 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 449 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 36 of 49 49. Net Developable Area: The private area defined by blocks which is not to remain for public uses such as Plazas, Greens, Squares, Thoroughfares or Streetscapes. 50. Nonconforming Industrial Use: A nonconforming use as defined in Section 41-126 of the SAMC that was established on any parcel or within any building located within the boundaries of SD-84 established by this Article that is listed in the uses permitted or uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit of Division 18. M-1 (Light Industrial) or Division 19. M-2 (Heavy Industrial) of this Chapter but that are no longer permissible through amendment to this Article. 51. Noxious Use: A nonconforming industrial use that is located within one thousand (1,000) linear feet of a public park, school (K-12) as defined by Section 11362.768 of the Health and Safety Code, or property used or zoned for residential purposes whose primary business operations involve any two (2) or more of the following: a. Emitting, generating, or discharging of particulate materials; exhausting emissions; or handling, storing emitting or discharging regulated compounds, hazardous materials, chemicals, or substances; b. Operations that are regulated by and require a permit from a federal, state, or regional agency; c. Storing, processing, or disposing of listed or hazardous waste; or d. Operations that are not contained within a fully enclosed building. 52. A primary use is the principal and dominant activity that the business is devoted to, distinguishing it from a secondary or ancillary use as defined in Section 41-13.5 of the SAMC. 53. Office: These do not include medical offices (see Clinic, Urgent Care," and "Doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc. office.") a. Service. Establishments providing direct services to consumers. Examples of these uses include employment agencies, insurance agent offices, real estate offices, travel agencies, utility company offices, elected official satellite offices, etc. This use does not include "Bank, Financial S ervices," which is separately defined. b. Administrative. Office-type facilities characterized by high employee densities, and occupied by businesses engaged in information processing, and other computer-dependent or telecommunications-based activities. Examples of these uses include: c. airline, lodging chain, and rental car company reservation centers, not including retail travel agencies d. computer software and hardware design and development consumer credit reporting e. data processing services f. health management organization (HMO) offices where no medical services are provided g. insurance claim processing   Planning Commission 1 – 48 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 450 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 37 of 49 h. mail order and electronic commerce transaction processing telecommunications facility design and management telemarketing i. Professional. Office-type facilities occupied by businesses that provide professional services, or are engaged in the production of intellectual property. Examples of these uses include: j. accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services advertising agencies k. attorneys l. business associations, chambers of commerce commercial art and design services construction contractors (office facilities only) counseling services m. court reporting services n. detective agencies and similar services o. design services including architecture, engineering, landscape architecture, urban planning p. educational, scientific and research organizations financial management and investment counseling literary and talent agencies q. management and public relations services media postproduction services r. news services s. photographers and photography studios political campaign headquarters psychologists t. secretarial, stenographic, word processing, and temporary clerical employee services u. security and commodity brokers v. writers and artists offices 54. Paseo: a public place or path designed for walking; promenade. 55. Pedestrian First: The practice of addressing the needs of people, once out of their automobiles, through a series of interdependent urban design and streetscape principles (e.g., wide sidewalks, street trees and shade, on-street parking, outdoor dining, inviting storefronts, the feeling of being in an ‘outdoor room’, short cross - walk distances, interconnected and short blocks). 56. Pedestrian Shed: An area defined by the average distance that may be traversed at an easy pace from its edge to its center in approximately 5 minutes. This distance is used to determine the size of a neighborhood. This dimension averages one quarter of a mile or approximately 1,400 feet for generally flat terrain. 57. Personal Services: Establishments providing non-medical services to individuals as a primary use. Examples of these uses include: a. barber, nail salons and beauty shops clothing rental b. dry cleaning pick-up stores with limited equipment home electronics and small appliance repair locksmiths c. pet grooming with no boarding shoe repair shops d. tailors   Planning Commission 1 – 49 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 451 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 38 of 49 e. These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. 58. Personal Services - Restricted: Personal services that may tend to have a blighting and/or deteriorating effect upon surrounding areas and which may need to be dispersed to minimize their adverse impacts. Examples of these uses include: a. laundromats (self-service laundries). Laundromats shall comply with the development and performance standards set forth in Section 41-199. b. massage establishments (licensed, therapeutic) as defined on Section 41 - 1751 of the SAMC. Massage establishments shall comply with Article XVII.I of Chapter 41 of the SAMC. Pawnshops. 59. Pet day care facility: Establishment offering daily, without overnight, care to a customer’s personal canine or feline pets. Grooming and educational training may be allowed as an ancillary use within the establishment. Does not include veterinary care or treatment, hospitalizations, or long-term boarding of pets. 60. Planter: The layer of the streetscape which accommodates street trees. Planters may be continuous or individual according to the Thoroughfare and location within the neighborhood. 61. Podium: A continuous raised platform supporting a building, or a large block of two or three stories beneath a multi-layer block of a smaller area. 62. Porch: see ‘Frontage Types’ 63. Private Frontage: The privately held layer between the frontage line and the principal building facade. The structures and landscaping within are held to specific standards. The variables of Private Frontage are the depth of the setback and the combination of architectural elements such as fences, stoops, porches and galleries. These elements inf luence social behavior in the public realm. The Frontage layer may overlap the public streetscape in the case of awnings, Galleries and Arcades. 64. Research and Development: A quasi-industrial facility where creative work is undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge generally in the fields of medicine, scientific instruments, safety- critical mechanism or high technology. These facilities may include pilot plant operations as an ancillary use, which shall not exceed 25 percent of the floor area. A facility providing full scale production shall be deemed a manufacturing use and shall be prohibited. 65. Rowhouse: See 'Building Types' 66. Setback: The area of a lot measured from a lot line to a building facade or elevation that must be maintained clear of permanent structures excepting galleries, fences, garden walls, arcades, porches, stoops, balconies, bay windows, and terraces   Planning Commission 1 – 50 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 452 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 39 of 49 which are permitted to encroach into the setback subject to the standards established in Division 3 of this Article. 67. Shared Parking (Park-Once Policy): An accounting for parking spaces that are avail- able to more than one function. The requirement is based on a range of parking- demand found in mature, mixed-use centers. The Shared Parking ratio varies according to multiple functions in close proximity unlikely to require the spaces at the same time. This approach to parking uses the following types of parking in combination to achieve a balanced and distributed supply of parking: off-street (surface lots and garages), on-street (parallel and diagonal). 68. Shopfront: see ‘Frontage Types’ 69. Stacked Dwellings: See 'Building Types' 70. Stoop: see ‘Frontage Types’ 71. Story: A habitable level within a building from finished floor to finished ceiling: Attics and basements, as defined by the California Building Code (CBC) are not considered a story for the purposes of determining building height and are subject to the applicable requirements of this code and the CBC, except for when the finished floor level directly above a basement or cellar is more than six feet above grade, such basement or cellar shall be considered a story 72. Streetscape: The urban element that provides the major part of the public realm as well as paved lanes for vehicles. A streetscape is endowed with two attributes: capacity and context. Capacity is the number of vehicles that can move safely through a segment within a given time period. It is physically manifested by the number of lanes and their width, and by the curb radius. 73. Studio: A workplace of one or more individuals who are engaged in the production of art, such as fine and fiber arts, lithography, calligraphy, photography, music, dance and the performing arts. Galleries, not to exceed 50 percent of the floor area, are permitted as an ancillary use. Any regulated use, as defined on Sec 41 - 191 of the SAMC is not allowed. Uses meeting the definition of artisan/craft product manufacturing shall be deemed an artisan/craft product manufacturing use. 74. Tandem Parking Stall: Two or more parking spaces arranged one behind the other. 75. Thoroughfare: A vehicular way incorporating moving lanes and parking lanes (except alleys/lanes which have no parking lanes) within a right-of-way. 76. Tower-on-Podium: See 'Building Types' 77. Trade school: A school consisting of vocational educational programs for students to be trained in the fields related to healthcare, technology, legal services, and professional trades.   Planning Commission 1 – 51 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 453 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 40 of 49 78. Traffic-Calming: A set of techniques which serves to reduce the speed of traffic. Such strategies include lane-narrowing, on-street parking, chicanes, yield points, sidewalk bulge-outs, speed bumps, surface variations, mid-block deflections, and visual clues. Traffic calming is a retrofit technique unnecessary when thoroughfares are correctly designed for the appropriate speed at initial construction. 79. Transect: A system of classification deploying the conceptual range of ‘rural-to- urban’ to arrange in useful order, the typical context groupings of natural and urban areas. This gradient, when rationalized and subdivided into zones becomes the basis of the Regulating Plan and the 9 zones supporting this Plan. 80. Transit-Oriented Development: A remedial pattern within a loose urbanized area. Its structure creates nodes at an efficient spacing for commuter or light rail. These nodes are mixed-use areas limited in extent by walking distance to the transit stop. These nodes are usually surrounded by a residential hinterland, structured as neighborhood T.O.D.’s connected by a feeder bus system. 81. Transition Line: A horizontal line, the full width of a facade expressed by a material change or by a continuous horizontal articulation such as a cornice or a balcony. 82. Tuck-under Housing: See 'Building Types' 83. Zaguan: A covered pedestrian passage between courts of one to two rooms in depth and one story in height.” Section 13. Any section or subsection of this Article, Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) that is not reprinted or modified by this ordinance is hereby unamended. Section 14. Any provision of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) or appendices thereto found inconsistent with the provisions of the Ordinance, only to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance, inclusive of correc tions for typographical error, and shall be considered the same as if adopted at the time of this Ordinance. Section 15. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitu tional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 16. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, Ordinance Nos. NS-3063 and NS- 3064 shall be automatically repealed and rescinded as of that date.   Planning Commission 1 – 52 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 454 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 41 of 49 Section 17. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2025. ________________________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: _________________________ Melissa M. Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: _________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: _________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, ____________________, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-_______ to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ___________________, 2025 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: ______________________ ________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana   Planning Commission 1 – 53 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 455 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 42 of 49 EXHIBIT “A” A. On April 19, 2022, The City adopted an Amended General Plan. The Amended General Plan became effective on May 26, 2022 and adopted a new Land Use Plan for the City and established new land use designations and policies for development of the City. B. On April 16, 2024, the City Council passed an Urgency Ordinance to adopt a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (Moratorium Ordinance”). No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately protect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents and businesses from incompatible industrial uses that cause a significant pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD84 Zoning District. C. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). D. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted an extension of the Moratorium Ordinance for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the California Government Code, Section 65858. The extension was necessary to allow sufficient time for staff to continue with conduct research of appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to develop appropriate zoning regulation to address the impacts of industrial development in the SD84 Zoning District. E. The Planning and Building Agency routinely reviews its ordinances to incorporate best practices, reflect changes to State law, and address community needs. F. In adopting the Moratorium on April 16, 2024, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana established the following findings, all of which below remain true, applicable and necessary to support the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 amending certain portions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District: 1. The Transit Zoning Code (TZC), located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010, and amended on July 16, 2019; and   Planning Commission 1 – 54 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 456 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 43 of 49 2. Upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; and 3. The goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian- oriented development framework to support the addition of new, and enhancement of existing communities through, transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and 4. Industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and 5. The TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until su ch time that properties were developed or improved to the mixed-use zones allowed by the TZC; and 6. Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called “disadvantaged communities”, in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision - making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and 7. The City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and 8. The Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana’s General Plan update complied wit h all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and 9. As required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all its elements, which include 77   Planning Commission 1 – 55 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 457 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 44 of 49 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and 10. Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE -5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and 11. The industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and 12. The Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican -American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century; and 13. The construction of Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in many families being displaced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and 14. In the 1970s, a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and 15. The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and 16. Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and   Planning Commission 1 – 56 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 458 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 45 of 49 17. The updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, they are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations—both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and 18. There are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conf licts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 35 commercial and industrial properties in the past twelve months and currently has 16 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and 19. In the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently near sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and 20. In the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently near sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration   Planning Commission 1 – 57 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 459 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 46 of 49 impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored b y socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and 21. There is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very- low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and 22. There is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor’s yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and st orage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and 23. The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023 to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and 24. MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. Since adoption of the moratorium and its extension, MIG and City staff have focused the comprehensive update through an initial phase concentrating on amending the TZC; and 25. The policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and   Planning Commission 1 – 58 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 460 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 47 of 49 26. Given these concerns, the City Council directed that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district. G. Following said analysis of the City Council points of discussion as iterated above, City staff has prepared ZOA No. 2024-02 to amend and add certain sections to Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend non - conforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and non -conforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District. H. Amendments to Chapter 41 (Zoning) are necessary to ensure uniform and legally consistent regulations as well as additions to enable the City to implement a regulatory framework that protects the health, safety, and welfare of the City. I. The proposed amendments to the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) that are the subject of this Ordinance support the objectives and policies of the City’s General Plan and are required to ensure consistency in accordance with Government Code Section 65860. J. Specifically, these amendments to the SAMC timely address current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be incon sistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU -1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: 1. Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life;   Planning Commission 1 – 59 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 461 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 48 of 49 2. Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; 3. Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance or elimination of those uses; 4. Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; 5. Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC; 6. Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit pollution near sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; 7. Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and 8. Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. K. Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: 1. LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. 2. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. 3. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries.   Planning Commission 1 – 60 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 462 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 49 of 49 4. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. 5. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. 6. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. 7. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities related to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. L. ZOA No. 2024-02 amends and adds certain sections to Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including Section 41-2001 (Application of Article), Section 41-2001.5 (Organization), Section 41-2002 (Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses), Section 41-2004 (The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone), Section 41-2005 (Application for Discretionary Approvals), Section 41-2006 (Zones Established), Section 41-2007 (Uses Permitted) Section 41-2008 (Operational Standards), Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses), and Section 41-2080 (Definitions). M. On February 24, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this Ordinance, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and recommended approval of the Ordinance to the City Council. N. On March 18, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this Ordinance, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard.   Planning Commission 1 – 61 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 463 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 1 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AMENDMENT APPLICATION (AA) NO. 2024-03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY REMOVING THE M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) SUFFIXES FROM CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SD-84 ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has, by separate action taken on March 18, 2025, adopted an Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact report (“EIR”) (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100), which was certified on June 7, 2010, by the City Council (“Addendum”). The Addendum analyzed the environmental impacts of the actions taken in this Ordinance. Adopting the Adden dum satisfied the City Council’s obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) regarding amendments to the Transit Zoning Code and none of the conditions in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines 15162 apply. Thu s, no further environmental review is required as adoption of this Ordinance falls within the scope of the adopted Addendum and previously certified EIR. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A.Chapter 41, Article I, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code provides that “Because of the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land; and regulating the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open spaces, the City is divided into land-use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulatio ns and provide for their enforcement. The regulations are considered necessary in order to: (a)Encourage the most appropriate use of land; (b)Conserve and stabilize property value, (c)Provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, (d)Prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and Exhibit 4: Ordinance for Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 ___________________________________________________________________________   Planning Commission 1 – 62 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 464 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 2 of 7 (e) Promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City.” Consistent with this purpose, the City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map, which has since been amended from time to time. B. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted an Amended General Plan The Amended General Plan became effective on May 26, 2022 and adopted a new Land Use Plan for the City and established new lan d use designations and policies for development of the City. C. On April 16, 2024, the City Council passed an Urgency Ordinance to adopt a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the T ransit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (the “Moratorium Ordinance”). The purpose of the Moratorium Ordinance was to immediately protect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents and businesses from incompatible industrial uses that cause a significant pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD -84 Zoning District. D. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code Specific Development No. 84. E. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted an extension of the Moratorium Ordinance for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to California Government Code , Section 65858. The extension was necessary to allow sufficient time for staff to continue with conduct research of appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to develop appropriate zoning regulation to address the impacts of industrial development in the SD -84 Zoning District. F. After continued research and study, two ordinances have been developed that address the impacts from industrial land uses in the SD -84 Zoning District. The ordinances address the following: a. Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 to amend certain provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and amend portions of the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amendment of non- conforming regulations; and, b. Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to remove the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties   Planning Commission 1 – 63 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 465 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 3 of 7 within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. G. AA No. 2024-03 is consistent with and implements the amendments proposed by ZOA No. 2024-02 by ensuring uniform and legally consistent mapping of the City’s Zoning Districts; and enables the City to implement a regulatory framework that protects the health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents. H. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map contained in AA No. 2024 - 03 are required to ensure consistency with the City’s General Plan in accordance with California Government Code, Section 65860. I. Adoption of AA No. 20243 is consistent with and implements the Amended General Plan. Specifically, it is consistent with the following: The amendments timely address current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. (a) Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), (b) Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development) (c) Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), (d) Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), (e) Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), (f) Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), (g) Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), (h) Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), (i) Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), (j) Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts); (k) Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), (l) Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and (m) Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development) which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: 1. Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life; 2. Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; 3. Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses;   Planning Commission 1 – 64 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 466 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 4 of 7 4. Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; 5. Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC; 6. Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit increased pollution new sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; 7. Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and 8. Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. J. Additionally, AA No. 2024-03 implements and/or contributes to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: 1. LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. 2. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. 3. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. 4. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. 5. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community.   Planning Commission 1 – 65 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 467 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 5 of 7 6. HE5.C - Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. 7. HE44.A - Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts and approves the Amendment to the Official Zoning Map of the City of Santa Ana, as shown in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for City Council Action dated March 18, 2025, and exhibits attached hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstituti onal by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and e ach section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2025. ________________________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor   Planning Commission 1 – 66 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 468 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 6 of 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: _________________________ Melissa Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: __________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: _________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: _________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, ____________________, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-_______ to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ___________________, 2024 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: ______________________ ________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana   Planning Commission 1 – 67 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 469 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 7 of 7 Exhibit A   Planning Commission 1 – 68 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 470 4/1/2025 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO MAKE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 AND TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER NO. 2006071100) WHEREAS , at a duly noticed public hearing held on June 7, 2010, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana (“City Council”) adopted findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and certified the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2006071100, “Transit Zoning Code EIR”), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations, §§15000, et seq., “CEQA Guidelines”) and adopted the City of Santa Ana’s Transit Zoning Code (“Transit Zoning Code”), which is designed to provide the zoning necessary to support the long-term development of a successful transit program; and WHEREAS, after continued research and study, two ordinances have been developed that address the impacts from industrial land uses in the Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84) Zoning District, also known as the Transit Zoning Code: (1) Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 to amend certain provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and amend portions of the Transit Zoning Code, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amendment of non -conforming regulations; and (2) Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to remove the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an EIR has been certified, the lead agency is required to review any changed circumstances to determine whether any of the circumstances under Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162 require additional environmental review; and WHEREAS, the City has evaluated the proposed ordinances to the Transit Zoning Code in light of the standards for subsequent environmental review outlined in Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162, and concluded that the proposed changes would not result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects that were previously disclosed in the Transit Zoning Code EIR, and therefore no subsequent EIR or mitigated negative declaration is required; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes would nonetheless necessitate minor changes or additions to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and, thus, the City has prepared an Addendum for the Transit Zoning Code EIR (“Addendum”), attached as Exhibit 1, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15164 to address the proposed ordinances; and Exhibit 5: Resolution of the City Council and Addendum to TZC EIR _____________________________________________________________________   Planning Commission 1 – 69 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 471 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, the Addendum was prepared in full compliance with CEQA, CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subdivision (c) does not require the Addendum to be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to a final EIR or adopted negative declaration; and WHEREAS, under CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and as referenced below, the "project" shall mean the proposed ordinances under the Transit Zoning Code including implementation of these ordinances; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider these proposed ordinances, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and recommended approval of the ordinances to the City Council; WHEREAS, on March 18, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed publi c hearing to consider these proposed ordinances, where all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS the City Council considered the entire administrative record, including the staff report (and all attachments thereto), the Transit Zoning Code EIR and Addendum, and oral and written testimony from interested persons; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are true and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 requires lead agencies to prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions to the project are necessary, but none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR are present. The City Council has reviewed and considered the administrative record, including but not limited to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and the Addendum, which are all incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein, and finds that those documents taken together contain a complete and accurate reporting of all the environmental impacts associated with the Transit Zoning Code. The City Council further finds that the Addendum and the administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds and determines that the Addendum reflects the City’s independent judgment. The City Council finds that the foregoing is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Furthermore, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an EIR has been certified, the City is required to review any changed   Planning Commission 1 – 70 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 472 4/1/2025 circumstances under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 to determine whether additional environmental review is required. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the administrative record, including but not limited to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and the Addendum, the City Council finds that none of the conditions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred because the proposed ordinances: a) do not constitute substantial changes that would require major revisions to the Transit Zoning Code EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; and b) do not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project was developed that would require major revisions of the Transit Zoning Code EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; and c) do not present new information of substantial importan ce that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Transit Zoning Code was certified, showing any of the following: (i) that the project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those previously analyzed woul d substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. Pursuant to CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, the City Council hereby adopts the foregoing findings and adopts the Addendum attached as Exhibit 1. City Council further directs City staff to cause a Notice of Determination to be filed and posted with the County of Orange Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse within five working days of the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. Section 4. The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Sant a Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The Planning and Building Agency is the custodian of records for the record of   Planning Commission 1 – 71 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 473 4/1/2025 proceedings. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6. Section 5. This Resolu tion shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2025 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: ABSTENTIONS: Councilmembers: _______________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:________________________ Melissa Crosthwaite Senior Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2025-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on March 18, 2025. Date: ________________ ____________________________________ Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk City of Santa Ana   Planning Commission 1 – 72 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 474 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 1 ADDENDUM   Planning Commission 1 – 73 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 475 4/1/2025 ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TRANSIT ZONING CODE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH NO. 2006071100 City of Santa Ana Amendment to Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development No. 84 Prepared For: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, California 92701 Prepared By: MIG, Inc. 1650 Spruce Street, Suite 106 Riverside, California 92507 January 2025   Planning Commission 1 – 74 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 476 4/1/2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements ............................................................................. 1 1.3 Incorporation by Reference ............................................................................................. 2 SECTION 2.0 – BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 3.0 – DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT ..................................................... 6 SECTION 4.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING..…..…………………………….............................9 SECTION 5.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................... 12 5.1 Aesthetics/Visual Resources ......................................................................................... 13 5.2 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................... 16 5.3 Biological Resources ..................................................................................................... 22 5.4 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 24 5.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................................................................. 27 5.6 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................... 31 5.7 Land Use………. ........................................................................................................... 34 5.8 Noise ............................................................................................................................. 36 5.9 Population, Housing and Employment ........................................................................... 39 5.10 Public Services .............................................................................................................. 40 5.11 Transportation ............................................................................................................... 42 5.12 Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................ 46 5.13 Global Climate Change ................................................................................................. 48 5.14 Mandatory Findings of Significance ............................................................................... 51 5.20 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 52 FIGURES Figure 1: Transit Zoning Code Area ............................................................................................ 4 Figure 2: Transit Zoning Code Zoning Designations ................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Regional Location ...................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4: Citywide Aerial ........................................................................................................... 11 TABLES Table 1 - Current and Proposed Text Regulations ...................................................................... 6   Planning Commission 1 – 75 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 477 4/1/2025 January 2025 1 Environmental Analysis 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Purpose On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District (or “SD 84A and 84B”) through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD84 Zoning District. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Based upon the City Council’s actions and direction enacting the moratorium combined with the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03. The proposed amendments (“proposed amendments” or “project”) will modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process for industrial uses; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Refer to Section 3.2 – Project Description. Following preliminary review of proposed ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03 amendments, the City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that the project is subject to CEQA (Public Resources Code (PRC) §§21000-21177; 14 CCR §§15000, et seq.). This Addendum to Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and 84B) Environmental Impact Report (“TZC EIR”) (SCH No. 2006071100) has been prepared to demonstrate that, pursuant to the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, this project is within the scope of the TZC EIR. As a result, the City does not need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR as the TZC EIR fully analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed amendments. This is consistent with Section 8.06 of the City’s Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states the following with respect to an Addendum to an EIR: a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.   Planning Commission 1 – 76 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 478 4/1/2025 January 2025 2 Environmental Analysis d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, states the following with respect to a Subsequent EIRs: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. 1.3 Incorporation by Reference The TZC Final EIR, including the original Draft EIR (DEIR), and has been made available for public review at the Lead Agency office (City of Santa Ana). The Final EIR is incorporated into this Addendum by reference.   Planning Commission 1 – 77 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 479 4/1/2025 January 2025 3 Environmental Analysis This Addendum is available for public inspection at the City at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA, and on the City’s website at https://www.santa-ana.org/environmental-impact-report- transit-zoning-code/. 2.0 BACKGROUND The TZC was established in June 2010, which is located in the area west of Interstate 5, north of First Street, and between Grand Avenue and Flower Street, and south of Civic Center Drive in the City of Santa Ana. The TZC provided new zoning for all of the properties contained within its boundary. However, some properties with existing M1 and M2 zoning and/or existing industrial businesses also received an overlay district designation which allowed for the continuation of industrial land uses on those properties and allows for the option of future mixed-use development to be exercised at the discretion of the property owner. The purpose was to establish a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. On June 7, 2010, the City adopted the TZC and certified the TZC Final EIR (SCH No. 2006071100). The TZC Final EIR provides a program-level and project-level analysis of the environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the TZC. The majority of the analysis is done at the program level; however, a project-level analysis is provided for the development proposal to demolish 30,000 square feet of existing structures on eleven Redevelopment Agency-owned parcels and to construct 220 affordable residential units. The TZC Final EIR concluded full implementation of the TZC would result in significant and unavoidable impacts with respect to the following: aesthetics, air quality, cultural resources, noise, transportation, and climate change. The TZC Final EIR’s background and environmental impact conclusions are cited throughout this Addendum. In July 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2970, amending the Transit Zoning Code to modify certain design criteria regarding height, massing, open space location, driveway standards, lot dimensions, and parking alternatives, and determined that this ordinance was exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, section 15061(b)(3). This amendment did not include changes to land uses or permit types within the TZC. In support of the TZC amendment, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. Refer to Figure 1 – Existing Transit Zoning Code area and Figure 2 Transit Zoning Code Designations, below. However, due to the continued application of the industrial overlay zones within the TZC, implementation of the new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts with the new General Plan.   Planning Commission 1 – 78 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 480 4/1/2025 January 2025 4 Environmental Analysis Figure 1 – Transit Zoning Code Area   Planning Commission 1 – 79 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 481 4/1/2025 January 2025 5 Environmental Analysis Figure 2 – Existing Transit Zoning Code Designations   Planning Commission 1 – 80 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 482 4/1/2025 January 2025 6 Environmental Analysis 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types, including the following: • Deletion of industrial land uses • Amend nonconforming regulations, including the addition of an amortization process • Amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses • Delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps • Delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map Implementation of the proposed amendments do not include nor require implementation of any site-specific development projects. Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations, below lists the proposed amendments and is followed by a summary of each. Figure 2.5 Proposed Transit Zoning Code Designations depicts the removal of I-OZ from the map. Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Application of Article SAMC Section 41-2001 establishes the land uses and standards applicable to the TZC - primarily for new uses. The update to text of this Section clarifies that the regulations apply to existing uses, whether conforming or nonconforming, change in land use or tenancy requiring issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Organization SAMC Section 41-2001.5 establishes the contents and organization of the TZC regulations The update to the text is necessary to encompass the new Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses). Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses SAMC Section 41-2002 establishes the regulations for nonconforming buildings, structures or uses within the TZC boundary. The provisions contain minimal limits for rehabilitation of buildings and structures and their expansion for both residential and non- residential uses. The update to text of this Section will further limit some rehabilitation of buildings and structures, with specific emphasis on nonconforming industrial uses. These updated provisions include: • Requiring rehabilitation or expansion of buildings and structures, occupied by any nonconforming use to comply with the new operational standards contained in Section 41-2009. • Prohibits expansion of a building or structure occupied by a nonconforming industrial use. • Discontinuation of nonconforming   Planning Commission 1 – 81 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 483 4/1/2025 January 2025 7 Environmental Analysis Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations noxious uses through amortization. • Elimination of certain nonconforming uses and structures • Establishes a process for enacting amortization periods for eliminating certain nonconforming uses. • References to SAMC and State law for abatement of public nuisances. • Establishes authority for voluntary compliance agreements between the City and nonconforming uses. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone SAMC Section 41-2004 establishes an overlay zone applied to M1 and M2 zoned properties located within the TZC boundary. Section 41-2004 is deleted in its entirety, removing the I-OZ Zone from the TZC to eliminate industrial land use type zoning altogether. Application for Discretionary Approvals SAMC Section 41-2005 establishes the process and timing of vesting for certain uses approved with a discretionary permit. Section 41-2005 is renumbered as 41- 2004, and the update to the text of this Section adds clarification for effects of the amendments to the TZC dependent upon status of an application in the City process of review, approval, and/or building permit issuance, if required. Zones Established SAMC Section 41-2006 contains the regulations for zoning districts, land uses, and permit types within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section deletes the I-OZ Zone, including replacing Figure 2.1, the Regulating Plan (map) with a new Figure 2.1 removing the I-OZ Zone designation from all parcels within the TZC boundary. Uses Permitted SAMC Section 41-2007 provides the allowable land uses and permit types required to establish a land use by each zoning district within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section clarifies application of the use standards by zoning district as follows: • Modifies Table 2A containing the Use Standards by adding and reclassifying certain land use types appropriate to the TZC land use subcategories • Deletes certain land use types that are inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the TZC, including the deletion of the Small-Scale Industry land use subcategory in its entirety. Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-2008 primarily regulates new uses within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section further limits certain operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses SAMC Section 41-2009 is an entirely new set of regulations specific to existing nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC. The new Section establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. The regulations cover general standards, enclosed   Planning Commission 1 – 82 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 484 4/1/2025 January 2025 8 Environmental Analysis Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. Definitions SAMC Section 41-2080 contains the definitions applicable to terms and land uses of the TZC. The update to the text of this Section provides clarification for certain land use types (artisan/craft product with limited on-site production, commercial recreation facility – indoor, and research and development), adds definitions for land use types (business support services, pet day care facility and trade school, nonconforming industrial, and noxious use), and deletes corresponding definitions for land use types that were deleted as part of the amendments to SAMC Section 41- 2006. Source: Planning Commission Staff Report   Planning Commission 1 – 83 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 485 4/1/2025 January 2025 9 Environmental Analysis Figure 2.5 – Proposed Transit Zoning Code Designations   Planning Commission 1 – 84 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 486 4/1/2025 January 2025 10 Environmental Analysis Analysis of the Amendments The proposed amendments to the Sections of the TZC under the topic headings of Application of Article, Organization, Application for Discretionary Approvals, and Definitions are largely to ensure internal consistency related to the more substantive changes being proposed for the TZC to address irreconcilable land use conflicts, described as follows: • Nonconforming Structures and Uses - Section 41-2002 regulates the nonconforming building, structure or use specifically within the TZC. The regulations are unique to the TZC and do not apply citywide. The regulations determine under certain circumstances when a nonconforming structure or use can rehabilitate both structural or nonstructural; or expand conditions that would allow expansion. Due to the concerns enumerated within this report related to nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC, the amendments to this section increasingly limit rehabilitation of structures to those types of improvements that address compliance with the new Section 41-2009 operational standards for nonconforming industrial uses; and disallow the expansion of any nonconforming industrial use. This Section also includes new provisions to establish a process for the discontinuance of nonconforming uses, specifically noxious uses, and the elimination of those uses or structures through an amortization hearing process. The tools that these new regulations provide are necessary to address the environmental impacts that lead to the adoption of the Moratorium, provide the framework to initiate the process to eliminate noxious industrial land uses from the TZC, and align with the adopted EJ policies of the General Plan. • The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone – Section 41-2004 created an “exception” zone for properties within the TZC that contained M1 or M2 industrial zoning, uses and structures, when the TZC was adopted in 2010. In order to be both consistent and to promulgate the General Plan land use designations within the TZC, the removal of this overlay zone is necessary. The zone currently gives deference to the property owner of these parcels with an industrial overlay to decide when and whether to redevelop their properties in a manner that would remove the industrial structure and use, replacing it with an allowable use and conforming to the design standards of the TZC. Eliminating the I-OZ Zone will cause these properties to become nonconforming as to use and structure, subjecting them to the regulations as amended and added to Section 41- 2002, including discontinuance of nonconforming use or structure though amortization. With the deletion of the entirety of the text of Section 41-2004, Section 41-2005 Application for Discretionary Approvals is renumbered as Section 41-2004. • Zones Established and Uses Permitted – Amendments to Sections 41-2006 and 41- 2007, respectively, include parallel deletion of the I-OZ Zone affecting the Regulating Plan (TZC zoning map) and the corresponding Use Standards tables regulating the land use and permit types for each of the remaining zones of the TZC. Table 2A categorizes land uses into broad subheadings for both residential and nonresidential land uses. The nonresidential land uses are further categorized into commercial-oriented versus industrial-oriented types of uses. The amendments will eliminate the Small-Scale Industry sub-category altogether, since the majority of these uses are industrial uses incompatible with residential uses. The purpose of the TZC is to promote transit-oriented mixed-use development, which pairs residential and nonresidential land uses either horizontally or vertically on a site or within a building. Compatibility of allowable land use types is critical, particularly given the history of the negative impacts from industrial uses remaining in the area and in close proximity to existing and new residential areas. Amending this Section also replaces the TZC zoning map figure to ensure consistency with the City’s Official Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Map in accordance with requirements of State law, Government Code Section 65860.   Planning Commission 1 – 85 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 487 4/1/2025 January 2025 11 Environmental Analysis • Operational Standards and Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses – Section 41-2008 contains operational standards applicable to all uses within the TZC boundary. This Section is largely unchanged, with clarification and strengthening of certain regulations to address any possible industrial type function of an allowable land use type as listed in the tables of Section 41-2007. These amendments affected any possible manufacturing related activities, sound, screening walls and eliminated any vehicular service on Sundays. Section 41-2009 establishes new regulations governing existing industrial uses made nonconforming with the removal of the I-OZ Zone within the TZC, and include general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. The amendments to Section 41-2008 and creation of new regulations under Section 41-2009 ensure that existing nonconforming uses comply with very specific operational standards and/or face amortization that leads ultimately to discontinuance of use, effectively reestablishing the TZC area with residential uses and allowing certain nonresidential uses compatible to such residential and/or mixed-use development. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The City of Santa Ana is located in Orange County and serves as the County seat. The City is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the City of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of the City of Newport Beach (refer to Figure 3, Regional Location). As shown in Figure 4, Citywide Aerial, the City is bordered by the City of Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, the City of Tustin to the east, the cities of Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and the cities of Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. The TZC area is shown in blue on both Figure 3 and Figure 4, and a detailed view is shown on Figure 1 in Section 2.0.   Planning Commission 1 – 86 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 488 4/1/2025 January 2025 12 Environmental Analysis Figure 3 – Regional Location   Planning Commission 1 – 87 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 489 4/1/2025 January 2025 13 Environmental Analysis Figure 4 – Citywide Aerial   Planning Commission 1 – 88 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 490 4/1/2025 January 2025 14 Environmental Analysis At the local level, the TZC area is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres, and is generally bounded by I-5 to the north and east, First Street to the south, and Flower Street to the west. Refer to Figure 1 in the Background section. The majority of the City is urbanized, with residential and nonresidential development, and mobility and public facilities all contributing to Santa Ana’s existing built environment. The City’s incorporated boundaries encompass approximately 27.4 square miles. Residential land uses occupy almost 40 percent of the land within the current City boundaries, accounting for 5,226 acres. Other predominant land uses include commercial (1,588 acres) and industrial (1,628 acres). While Santa Ana is a densely populated urban center with one of the most diverse international populations in Orange County, it can generally be characterized as a City of neighborhoods. Santa Ana has over 65 neighborhoods which are distinguished by their history, architecture, housing types, amenities, and unique character. The Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, also known as the TZC, is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres, and is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. The TZC area includes the Orange County Civic Center consisting of City, County and federal buildings, City, Downtown, the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and are established residential communities. Additional land uses include a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses. The TZC area overlaps portions of two of the City’s five focus areas, which are suited for new growth and development under the GPU: the Grand Avenue Avenue/17th Street Focus Area and the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The Grand Avenue Avenue/17th Street Focus Area is primarily business oriented with office and commercial storefronts and large apartment complexes. The West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area is characterized as a mix of residential, commercial and industrial. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Initial Study/Notice of Preparation of the DEIR (Appendix A) concluded certain topics to be “Effects Not Found to Be Significant” according to Section 15128 of the CEQA Guidelines as having less than significant or no impacts, and therefore were not included in the Final EIR. Agricultural Resources. The Initial Study concluded that the soils within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area are not candidates for listing as prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance. In addition, no farmland or agricultural activity exists on or in the vicinity of the Transit Zoning Code, and no portion is under a Williamson Act contract. The Initial Study concluded no that no impacts would occur. Geology and Soils. The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is located in an area of minimal geologic hazards. Any development within the project area would be designed in accordance with applicable building code requirements, which account for seismic groundshaking. The Initial Study concluded that no and less than significant impacts to would occur. Mineral Resources. The Initial Study determined that implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in the loss of availability of either a known mineral resource of value to the state or region, or a locally important mineral resource recovery site, because no such sites exist within the project area. The Initial Study concluded that implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in the loss of   Planning Commission 1 – 89 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 491 4/1/2025 January 2025 15 Environmental Analysis availability of a locally important mineral resource delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Because the TZC Final EIR was certified in 2010, certain topics that were later added to the state CEQA Guidelines checklist were not included. The Tribal Cultural Resources topic was added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2017. Although added as a separate topic, the TZC DEIR Cultural Resources section did include an evaluation of Native American resources in Section 4.4.1 – Environmental Setting and Section 4.4.2 – Regulatory Framework. Impact 4.4-1 included MM 4.4-1(a) that required construction monitoring by a tribe. The TZC EIR included a Global Climate Change topic, which included greenhouse gas emissions. The Greenhouse Gas Emissions topic was added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2018. Greenhouse Gas Emissions was discussed in Section 4.13.2 – Existing Conditions, Section 4.13.2 – Regulatory Framework, and Section 4.13.4 – Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures. The Energy and Wildfire topics were added to the CEQA Guidelines in 2018. Although added as separate topics, Energy is discussed within Sections 4.12.12 and 4.12.13 of the Utilities and Service Systems topic of the TZC EIR. Wildfire (i.e. wildland fires), is discussed within Section 4.5.3 of the Hazards and Hazardous Materials topic of the TZC EIR. Although these topics were added following certification of the TZC Final EIR, they were discussed and analyzed in the respective sections identified above and do not represent new impacts not previously addressed. Sections 5.1 through 5.13, below, analyzes the potentially significant impacts that could occur as a result of implementing the proposed project through the adoption of the proposed text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations. Each topical section lists impact statements and mitigation measures from the TZC EIR, and provides an analysis and conclusion. Each TZC EIR conclusion includes a reference to the EIR impact statement (ex., Impact 4.1-3) and includes its associated significance finding. 5.1 AESTHETICS/VISUAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to aesthetics and visual resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? e. A project would be considered to create significant shade/shadow impacts if shade/shadow from the project results in a substantial loss of sunlight in a residential area or other sensitive receptor. Other sensitive receptors would include schools and parks.   Planning Commission 1 – 90 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 492 4/1/2025 January 2025 16 Environmental Analysis TZC EIR Conclusions • Implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not substantially damage scenic resources within a State scenic highway, and no further analysis is necessary in this EIR. (DEIR Section 4.1.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would contribute to the image of, and add to the aesthetic quality of the City. As such, development under the proposed project would not degrade the existing visual quality of the area or obstruct key existing views and/or vistas in the vicinity. (Impact 4.1-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Future development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would improve the existing visual character. (Impact 4.1-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code, and associated infrastructure improvements would result in new sources of increased daytime glare. (Impact 4.1-3: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would result in new sources of spillover light. (Impact 4.1-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in a substantial increase in shade/shadows over sensitive uses. (Impact 4.1-5: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR FEIR Mitigation Measures MM4.1-1 Proposed new structures shall be designed to maximize the use of textured or other non-reflective exterior surfaces and non-reflective glass. Building materials shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of building permits for each project. (Impact 4.1-3) MM4.1-2 All exterior lighting and advertising (including signage) shall be directed onto the specific location intended for illumination (e.g., parking lots, driveways, and walkways) and shielded away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way to minimize light spillover onto adjacent areas. (Impact 4.1-4) MM4.1-3 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a specific development project, the applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the City for review and approval. The plan shall specify the lighting type and placement to ensure that the effects of security and other outdoor lighting are minimized on adjacent uses and do not create spillover effects. The plan shall specifically incorporate the following design features: o All projects shall incorporate project design features to shield light and/or glare from vehicles entering or exiting parking lots and structures that face sensitive uses (e.g., schools, hospitals, senior housing, or other residential properties) by providing barriers so that light from vehicle headlights would not illuminate off-site sensitive uses. o All projects shall incorporate project design features to provide landscaping, physical barriers, screening, or other buffers to minimize project-generated illumination from entering off-site areas and to prevent glare or interference with vehicular traffic, in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code. (Impact 4.1-4)   Planning Commission 1 – 91 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 493 4/1/2025 January 2025 17 Environmental Analysis MM4.1-4 For any proposed structure that would exceed four stories in height, applicants shall submit a site-specific shade/shadow report with renderings representing the level of shade/shadows associated with the proposed development at the following times: 9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 3:00 P.M. PST for the both the winter and summer solstices. An additional rendering for the 5:00 P.M. PST time period shall be prepared for the summer solstice period. Typically, a variety of criteria are used to determine the significance of a shadow impact, including the following: o Affected land use (criticality of direct sunlight for the use). o Duration (hours per day in shadow); time of day (critical time period for direct sunlight). o Season (time of year use would be shadowed). o Extent (percentage of use that would be shadowed). o Preexisting condition (shadow condition due to existing buildings, landscaping, or other features). o Type (solid or dappled shadow). The report shall include any feasible design considerations that would reduce the extent of shadows cast by a proposed structure. The analysis and the project design plans shall be forwarded to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. (Impact 4.1-5) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that no impacts related to State Scenic Highways would result from implementation of the project because no scenic highways are located within the TZC area. Impacts related to visual and aesthetic quality (Impact 4.1-1) and visual character (Impact 4.1- 2) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to daytime glare (Impact 4.1-3) and spillover light (Impact 4.1-4) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Long-term development related shade and shadows (Impact 4.1-5) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make mitigation infeasible. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Implementation of the project through the proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations does not trigger new aesthetic and visual resources impacts requiring preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the project modifies the list of land uses and permit types (refer to Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations) including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the additional of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC area. Thus, there are no new land uses being introduced or different development standards that would have aesthetic or visual resource impacts. In particular, the proposed amendments will establish regulations for nonconforming uses, including light and glare. These regulations and standards will cover general standards, enclosed operations, light, glare, and outdoor storage and screening. No direct or indirect glare or heat, whether from floodlights or from high-temperature processes (including combustion or welding or otherwise) shall be visible or felt at the property line. Lighting must be shielded, boxed, or directed at a downward angle so as to minimize the generation of light and glare and to assure that there is no spillover of light and glare that will impact drivers or pedestrians on the public streets, on site activities, and adjoining or nearby properties. No activity shall be permitted which causes excessive light and glare to be transmitted or reflected to surrounding properties at a level resulting in detrimental impacts to adjacent properties. Light sources shall generally not be permitted in landscaped, buffer, or setback areas except for those illuminating   Planning Commission 1 – 92 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 494 4/1/2025 January 2025 18 Environmental Analysis pedestrian walkways. Lighting used to illuminate parking areas shall be designed, located, and installed to be shielded and downlit and to reflect away from any nearby residential areas. Lighting for advertising signs shall not create glare or light which extends to surrounding properties. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures MM4.1-1 through MM4.1-4 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new aesthetics impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more significant impacts to aesthetics and visual resources. 5.2 AIR QUALITY This section analyzes the effects to air quality from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the proposed project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? TZC EIR Conclusions • The project would not create substantial objectionable odors. (Impact 4.2-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The project would not create short-term quantities of criteria pollutants above the significance thresholds published by SCAQMD. (Impact 4.2-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the project would increase local traffic volumes, but would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial localized carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations. (Impact 4.2-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The anticipated population increase of 12,225 new residents as a result of the long -term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code is consistent with the SCAG growth projections for Santa Ana and, therefore, would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Air Quality Management Plan. (Impact 4.2-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Construction activities associated with the construction of individual projects within the Transit Zoning Code area, including the Developer project, would contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation for criteria air pollutants. (Impact 4.2-5: Significant and Unavoidable with mitigation)   Planning Commission 1 – 93 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 495 4/1/2025 January 2025 19 Environmental Analysis • Operation of the proposed project would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District standards for VOC, NOX, CO, and PM10 and would result in a projected air quality violation. (Impact 4.2-6: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) • Construction and operation of the proposed project would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the proposed project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. (Impact 4.2-7: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.2-1 Trash receptacles within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) will be required to have lids that enable convenient collection and loading and will be emptied on a regular basis, in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations for the collection of solid waste. (Impact 4.2-1) MM4.2-2 The construction contractor should ensure that no more than 5 acres per day are actively graded or developed. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-3 The construction contractor should ensure that all active disturbed surfaces should be watered three times per day throughout the construction period. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-4 The construction contractor should ensure that the mass grading, fine grading, and structure construction are conducted at separate time periods and do not overlap with one another. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-5 The construction contractor should ensure that all haul roads are watered three (3) times per day. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-6 The construction contractor should ensure that all traffic on unpaved roads is reduced to 15 mph or less. (Impact 4.2-2) MM4.2-7 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that all diesel-powered equipment used will be retrofitted with after-treatment products (e.g., engine catalysts) to the extent that they are readily available in the South Coast Air Basin. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-8 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that all heavy-duty diesel- powered equipment operating and refueling at the project site use low-NOX diesel fuel to the extent that it is readily available and cost effective (up to 125 percent of the cost of California Air Resources Board diesel) in the South Coast Air Basin (this does not apply to diesel-powered trucks traveling to and from the project site). Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-9 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that alternative fuel construction equipment (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) be utilized to the extent that the equipment is readily available and cost effective in the South Coast Air Basin. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5)   Planning Commission 1 – 94 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 496 4/1/2025 January 2025 20 Environmental Analysis MM4.2-10 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that construction equipment engines be maintained in good condition and in proper tune per manufacturer’s specification for the duration of construction. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-11 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure surrounding the construction site rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-12 As required by South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403—Fugitive Dust, all construction activities that are capable of generating fugitive dust are required to implement dust control measures during each phase of project development to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air. These measures include the following: o Application of soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas. o Quick replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas. o Watering of exposed surfaces three times daily. o Watering of all unpaved haul roads three times daily. o Covering all stock piles with tarp. o Reduction of vehicle speed on unpaved roads. o Post signs on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. o Sweep streets adjacent to the project site at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads. o Cover or have water applied to the exposed surface of all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. o Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads to wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-13 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes. Diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-14 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction parking be configured to minimize traffic interference during the construction period and, therefore, reduce idling of traffic. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-15 The developer shall require by contract specifications that temporary traffic controls are provided, such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM 4.2-16 The developer shall require by contract specifications that construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system by scheduled to off-peak hours (9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.).   Planning Commission 1 – 95 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 497 4/1/2025 January 2025 21 Environmental Analysis Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-17 Upon issuance of building or grading permits, whichever is issued earliest, notification shall be mailed to owners and occupants of all developed land uses within ¼ mile of any project within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) boundaries greater than four stories in height or 25,000 sf in area providing a schedule for major construction activities that will occur through the duration of the construction period. In addition, the notification will include the identification and contact number for a community liaison and designated construction manager that would be available on site to monitor construction activities. The construction manager shall be responsible for complying with all project requirements related to PM10 generation. The construction manager will be located at the on-site construction office during construction hours for the duration of all construction activities. Contract information for the community liaison and construction manager will be located at the construction office, City Hall, the police department, and a sign on site. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-18 The developer shall require by contract specifications that the architectural coating (paint and primer) products used would have a VOC rating of 125 grams per liter or less. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-19 The developer shall require by contract specifications that materials that do not require painting be used during construction to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-20 The developer shall require by contract specifications that pre-painted construction materials be used to the extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Ana. (Impact 4.2-5) MM4.2-21 As individual components of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) are implemented, an air quality impact analyses will be completed to determine their independent significance levels. Mitigation is to be incorporated at the individual component level to bring the individual components to less than significant on a site-by-site basis. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-22 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures exceeds current Title 24 requirements (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; The Energy Commission adopted the 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008, and the Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. The 2008 Residential Compliance Manual was adopted by the Commission on December 17, 2008, and the 2008 Non-residential Compliance Manual was adopted January 14, 2009.Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended November 1, 2005; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent, subject to review by the County Building Official. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning Department and Building Official for review and approval prior to issuance of the permit. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the County Building Official prior to certificate of occupancy. Any combination of the following design features may be used to fulfill this mitigation provided that the total increase in efficiency meets or exceeds 20 percent: o Increase in insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging is minimized   Planning Commission 1 – 96 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 498 4/1/2025 January 2025 22 Environmental Analysis o Limit air leakage through the structure or within the heating and cooling distribution system to minimize energy consumption o Incorporate dual-paned or other energy efficient windows o Incorporate energy efficient space heating and cooling equipment o Incorporate energy efficient light fixtures o Incorporate energy efficient appliances o Incorporate energy efficient domestic hot water systems o Incorporate solar panels into the electrical system o Incorporate cool roofs/light-colored roofing o Or other measures that will increase the energy efficiency of building envelope in a manner that when combined with the other options listed above exceeds current Title 24 Standards (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended November 1, 2005; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-23 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a landscape plan for the Project that includes shade trees around main buildings, particularly along southern elevations where practical, and will not interfere with loading dock locations or other operational constraints. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-24 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed building or structure designs incorporate exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public areas. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-25 The applicant shall provide education and publicity about reducing waste and available recycling services to future tenants. The education and publicity materials shall be provided to the City for review and approval by the Planning Department. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-26 All showerheads, lavatory faucets, and sink faucets within the residential units shall comply with the California Energy Conservation flow rate standards. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-27 Low-flush toilets shall be installed within all commercial and residential (including Congregate Care) units as specified in California State Health and Safety Code Section 17921.3. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-28 All commercial/industrial/common area irrigation areas shall be capable of being operated by a computerized irrigation system which includes an onsite weather station/ET gage capable of reading current weather data and making automatic adjustments to independent run times for each irrigation valve based on changes in temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, rain, and wind. In addition, the computerized irrigation system shall be equipped with flow-sensing capabilities, thus automatically shutting down the irrigation system in the event of a mainline break or broken head. These features will assist in conserving water, eliminating the potential of slope failure due to mainline breaks, and eliminating over-watering and flooding due to pipe and/or head breaks. (Impact 4.2-6)   Planning Commission 1 – 97 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 499 4/1/2025 January 2025 23 Environmental Analysis MM4.2-29 Landscape designers shall ensure that Project landscaping of commercial/industrial/common areas uses drought-tolerant and smog-tolerant trees, shrubs, and groundcover to ensure long-term viability and conserve water and energy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-30 Landscape designers shall ensure that the landscape plan includes drought resistant trees, shrubs, and groundcover within the parking lot and perimeter. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-31 Project designers shall ensure that design features incorporate light-colored roofing materials that will deflect heat away from the building and conserve energy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-32 The Project designers shall ensure that designs include all illumination elements to have controls to allow selective use as an energy conservation measure. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-33 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to promote ride sharing programs such as, but not necessarily including, publishing ride sharing information for all of the tenants, designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a website or message board for coordinating rides. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-34 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-35 Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that all interior building lighting supports the use of compact fluorescent light bulbs or equivalently efficient lighting to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-36 Tenants shall be responsible to ensure that preferential parking spaces are allocated to ultra-low emission vehicles and alternative fueled vehicles to encourage the use of alternative fuels and ultra-low emission vehicles. (Impact 4.2-6) MM4.2-2 through MM4.2-29 would also apply to this impact. (Impact 4.2-7) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to increased local traffic volumes (Impact 5.2-3) and SCAG growth projections (Impact 4.2-4) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to objectionable odors (Impact 4.2-1), criteria pollutants (Impact 4.2- 2), contribute to an air quality violation (Impact 4.2-5) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to exceeding criteria pollutants during operations (Impact 4.2-6) and construction (Impact 4.2-7) were significant and unavoidable, and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts.   Planning Commission 1 – 98 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 500 4/1/2025 January 2025 24 Environmental Analysis The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the project modifies the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the additional of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC area. Thus, there are no new land uses being introduced that would have air quality impacts. The proposed amendments will introduce new regulations for nonconforming industrial use that would discontinue nonconforming noxious uses, establish screening walls, eliminate vehicle servicing on Sundays. These regulations would reduce dust and lessen air quality emissions. No land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere. Uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emits dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. Sources of air emissions shall comply with all rules established by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40), the California Air Resources Board, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. These regulations will have a beneficial impact to air quality. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to air quality. Mitigation measures MM4.2-1 through MM4.2-36 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new air quality impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to air quality. 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to biological resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? TZC EIR Conclusions   Planning Commission 1 – 99 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 501 4/1/2025 January 2025 25 Environmental Analysis • No endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species designated by the USFWS, CDFG, or CNPS are known to occur or expected to occur within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are located in these areas. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not in proximity to, nor does it contain, wetland habitat or a blueline stream. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) is surrounded by urban uses on all four sides, including two highways, and, therefore, does not function as a wildlife movement corridor. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Implementation of the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • No conflict with an adopted habitat conservation plan, Orange County NCCP/HCP or other local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan would occur, and there would be no impact. (DEIR Section 4.3.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not result in a potential reduction in nesting opportunities for resident and migratory avian species of special concern. (Impact 4.3-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.3-1 To ensure that avian species of concern, protected migratory species (e.g., MBTA), or raptors species are not injured or disturbed by construction in the vicinity of nesting habitat, the project applicant shall implement the following measures: 1. Tree removal shall be restricted to the period between August 30 and February 15, to the extent feasible, to avoid the breeding season of any migratory species that could be using the area, and to discourage nesting in the vicinity of an upcoming construction area. If it is not feasible to remove trees outside this window then, prior to the beginning of mass grading, including grading for major infrastructure improvements, during the period between February 15 and August 30, all trees within 250 feet of any grading or earthmoving activity shall be surveyed for active nests by a qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to disturbance. If active nests are found, and the site is within 250 feet of potential construction activity, a temporary fence shall be erected, where appropriate, around the tree(s) at a distance of up to 250 feet, depending on the species, from the edge of the canopy to prevent construction disturbance and intrusions on the nest area. The appropriate buffer shall be determined in consultation with the City of Santa Ana Park Naturalist or a designee. 2. No construction vehicles shall be permitted within restricted areas (i.e., protection zones), unless directly related to the management or protection of the legally protected species. 3. If a legally protected species nest is located in a tree designated for removal, the removal shall be deferred until after August 30, or until the adults and young of the year are no longer dependent on the nest site as determined by a qualified biologist. (Impact 4.3-1) Project Analysis and Conclusion   Planning Commission 1 – 100 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 502 4/1/2025 January 2025 26 Environmental Analysis The City determined that impacts related to endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species or associated habitats or wildlife species, riparian habitat and sensitive natural communities, wetlands or blue line streams, wildlife movement corridors, habitat conservation plans, and biological resource policies would not have any impacts. Impacts to avian species were less than significant with implementation of the mitigation measures. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the TZC area is intended to be developed for urban uses and located in an area that is completely developed for urban uses. Because TZC area is a heavily disturbed and graded area consisting of industrial and residential uses, and the project does not introduce any new types of land use, and instead removes the industrial overlay zone, there will be no impacts to biological resources. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to biological resources. The project does not trigger new biological resource impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. Mitigation measure MM4.3-1 would continue to apply. There would be no new or more significant impacts to biological resources. 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES This section analyzes the effects to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? TZC EIR Conclusions • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource or disturb human remains. (Impact 4.4-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code has the potential to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature. (Impact 4.4-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The adoption of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Impact 4.4-3: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures   Planning Commission 1 – 101 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 503 4/1/2025 January 2025 27 Environmental Analysis MM4.4-1(a) Prior to any earth-disturbing activities (e.g., excavation, trenching, grading) that could encounter undisturbed soils, the project applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to determine if the project could result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines or disturb human remains. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the archaeologist and the City of Santa Ana, an updated records search of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), updated Native American consultation, and a pedestrian survey of the area proposed for development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any archaeological resources within the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on archaeological resources or human remains. The measures shall include, as appropriate, subsurface testing of archaeological resources and/or construction monitoring by a qualified professional and, if necessary, appropriate Native American monitors identified by the applicable tribe (e.g., the Gabrieliño Tongva Nation) and/or the Native American Heritage Commission. The methods shall also include procedures for the unanticipated discovery of human remains, which shall be in accordance with Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City of Santa Ana for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on archaeological resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. Projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils and would therefore not be required to retain an archaeologist shall demonstrate non-disturbance to the City through the appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth-disturbing activities. Projects that would include any earth disturbance (disturbed or undisturbed soils) shall comply with MM4.4-2(b). (Impact 4.4-1) MM4.4-1(b) If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected historical resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity (“midden”), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) are discovered during any project-related earth- disturbing activities (including projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils), all earth- disturbing activity within 100 feet of the find shall be halted and the City of Santa Ana shall be notified. The project applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by the archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-L) form and filed with the SCCIC. (Impact 4.4-1) MM4.4-2(a) Prior to any earth-disturbing activities (e.g., excavation, trenching, grading) that could encounter undisturbed soils, the project applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist to determine if the project could directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the paleontologist and the City of Santa Ana, a paleontology records check and a pedestrian survey of the area proposed for development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies the paleontological sensitivity of the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on paleontological resources or unique geologic   Planning Commission 1 – 102 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 504 4/1/2025 January 2025 28 Environmental Analysis features. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on paleontological resources or unique geologic features identified in the technical report or memorandum. Projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils and would therefore not be required to retain a paleontologist shall demonstrate non-disturbance to the City through the appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth-disturbing activities. Projects that would include any earth disturbance (disturbed or undisturbed soils) shall comply with MM4.4-3(b). (Impact 4.4-2) MM4.4-2(b) Should paleontological resources (i.e., fossil remains) be identified at a particular site during project construction, the construction foreman shall cease construction within 100 feet of the find until a qualified professional can provide an evaluation. Mitigation of resource impacts shall be implemented and funded by the project applicant and shall be conducted as follows: 1. Identify and evaluate paleontological resources by intense field survey where impacts are considered high 2. Assess effects on identified sites 3 Consult with the institutional/academic paleontologists conducting research investigations within the geological formations that are slated to be impacted 4. Obtain comments from the researchers 5. Comply with researchers’ recommendations to address any significant adverse effects where determined by the City to be feasible In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting paleontologist, the City of Santa Ana staff shall determine whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, project design, costs, applicable policies and land use assumptions, and other considerations. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources is carried out. (Impact 4.4- 2) MM4.4-3 Prior to development activities that would demolish or otherwise physically affect buildings or structures 50 years old or older or affect their historic setting, the project applicant shall retain a cultural resource professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History to determine if the project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the cultural resource professional and the City of Santa Ana, the appropriate archival research, including, if necessary, an updated records search of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and a pedestrian survey of the proposed development area to determine if any significant historic-period resources would be adversely affected by the proposed development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any historical resources within the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City Santa Ana for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical   Planning Commission 1 – 103 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 505 4/1/2025 January 2025 29 Environmental Analysis resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. Such methods could include, but not be limited to, written and photographic recordation of the resource in accordance with the level of Historic American Building Survey (HABS) documentation that is appropriate to the significance (local, state, national) of the resource. (Impact 4.4-3) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to archaeological resources (Impact 4.4-1) unique paleontological resources (Impact 4.4-2), and disturbing human remains were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to historical resources (Impact 4.4-3) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. The TZC EIR states that there are 80 designated historic properties that are listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, five that are listed on the California Points of Historical Interest, and one that is listed on the California Historical Landmarks within and adjacent to the TZC area. The TZC area has already been subject to extensive disruption from previous development and may contain artificial fill materials. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required, nor would the project introduce new land uses that would have impact to cultural or tribal cultural resources that could otherwise make the long-term significant and unavoidable historical resource impacts more severe. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a), MM4.4- 1(b), MM4.4-2(a), MM4.2(b), and MM4.4-3 would continue to apply. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to cultural resources. Therefore, the project does not trigger new cultural or tribal cultural resource impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to cultural and tribal cultural resources. 5.5 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS This section analyzes the effects to hazards and hazardous materials from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?   Planning Commission 1 – 104 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 506 4/1/2025 January 2025 30 Environmental Analysis c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? TZC EIR Conclusions • A private airstrip/heliport is not known to be located within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, nor is the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area located in close proximity to a private airstrip/heliport. (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is located in a dense urban environment and is surrounded by existing development. There are no wildland areas, nor wildland interface areas located in the vicinity. Consequently, no wildland fires would affect, or be affected by, implementation of the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B). (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could involve the transportation, use, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous materials, such as diesel exhaust. (Impact 4.5-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Construction activities associated with implementation of the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in the release of hazardous materials to the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions. (Impact 4.5-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Construction activities associated with the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would result in the handling of hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing school. (Impact 4.5-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) includes sites which are included on a list of hazardous materials sites and as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or environment. (Impact 4.5-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Construction activities associated with the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code could result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. (Impact 4.5-5: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The Transit Zoning Code could impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan resulting in a significant impact. (Impact 4.5-6: Less Than Significant with mitigation)   Planning Commission 1 – 105 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 507 4/1/2025 January 2025 31 Environmental Analysis TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.5-1 When sites that are listed in the EDR Report initiate project development, the project applicant shall prepare a Phase I ESA for the proposed site. The Phase I ESA shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM E-1527-05 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process” (November 1, 2006). The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify environmental conditions at a proposed project site that may suggest environmental contamination. The Phase I ESA report shall be prepared by a CA EPA Registered Environmental Assessor or similarly qualified individual prior to initiating any construction activities at the site. If recommended in the Phase I ESA, the project sponsor shall undertake (or require the responsible party to undertake) a Phase II ESA soil sampling plan; or if any environmental contamination is identified by the Phase I ESA, the project sponsor shall implement (or require the responsible party to implement) the recommendations of the report to further investigate and to remove any soil contamination. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-2 In the event that previously unknown or unidentified soil and/or groundwater contamination that could present a threat to human health or the environment is encountered during construction in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the contamination shall cease immediately. If contamination is encountered, a Risk Management Plan shall be prepared and implemented that (1) identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk each contaminant would pose to human health and the environment during construction and post-development and (2) describes measures to be taken to protect workers, and the public from exposure to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation, long-term monitoring, post-development maintenance or access limitations, or some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of contamination, if any, appropriate agencies shall be notified (e.g., Santa Ana Fire Department). If needed, a Site Health and Safety Plan that meets Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements shall be prepared and in place prior to commencement of work in any contaminated area. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-3 Prior to the demolition of structures that were constructed before 1980, a thorough investigation shall be completed to determine if asbestos, lead, or PCBs exist on the site. All demolition that could result in the release of lead and/or asbestos must be conducted according to Cal/OSHA standards. (Impact 4.5-2) MM4.5-4 For development of structures that exceed 200 feet in height above ground level at a development site, applicants shall file a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the FAA (FAA Form 7460-1). Following the FAA’s aeronautical evaluation of the project, projects must comply with conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the FAA. Subsequent to the FAA findings, the project shall be reviewed by the ALUC for consistency analysis. (Impact 4.5-5) MM4.5-5 Prior to initiation of construction activities, any development within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) Area shall have a completed traffic control plan, prepared by the project proponent that will be implemented during construction activities. This may include, but is not limited to, the maintenance of at least one unobstructed lane in both directions on surrounding roadways. At any time if only a single lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic signal, signal carriers (i.e., flagpersons), or other appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions. If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer shall provide appropriate signage indicating alternative routes. (Impact 4.5-6)   Planning Commission 1 – 106 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 508 4/1/2025 January 2025 32 Environmental Analysis MM4.5-6 The City Public Works Department shall consult with the Santa Ana Police Department and the Santa Ana Fire Department to disclose temporary closures and alternative travel routes in order to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles when construction of future projects would result in temporary land or roadway closures. (Impact 4.5-6) MM4.5-7 The Santa Ana Fire Department, in consultation with other applicable City Departments (e.g., Police), shall update their Emergency Preparedness Plan prior to occupancy of the first project developed under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B), to address the potential for the accidental release of hazardous materials that may be used, stored, and/or transported in association with operation of project implementation. (Impact 4.5-6) MM4.5-8 Project applicants shall submit evacuation plans on a project by project basis that shall be reviewed and approved by the City Police and Fire Departments. (Impact 4.5-6) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to people residing or working in the vicinity of a private airstrip/heliport and wildland areas would have no impact (DEIR Section 4.5.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact). Impacts related to transportation, storage and disposal of hazardous materials (Impact 4.5-1) and handling of hazardous materials near a school (Impact 4.5-3) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to reasonably upset of hazardous materials into the environment (Impact 4.5-2), hazardous materials sites (Impact 4.5-4), construction safety hazards for people or residing in the TZC area (Impact 4.5- 5) and interference with an adopted emergency response plan (Impact 4.5-6) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would require that no material or waste shall be deposited upon a subject parcel in such form or manner that it may be transferred off the parcel by natural causes or forces and that all materials or wastes which might cause fumes or dust, or which constitute a fire hazard, or which may be edible by or otherwise be attractive to rodents or insects shall be stored outdoors only in closed containers. Land or buildings shall not be used or occupied in any manner so as to create any fire, explosive or other hazard. All activities involving the use or storage of combustible, explosive, caustic, or otherwise hazardous materials shall comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal safety standards and shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fire and explosion, and adequate firefighting and fire suppression equipment in compliance with City of Santa Ana regulations. The burning of waste materials in open fires without written approval of the Fire Department is prohibited. No activities shall be permitted which emit dangerous radioactivity at any point nor shall electrical disturbances which adversely affect the operation of any equipment, other than that of the creator of such disturbances, be allowed. No use, activity or process shall cause electromagnetic interference with normal radio and television reception, or with the function of other electronic equipment beyond the property line of the site in which it is situated. All uses, activities and processes shall comply with applicable Federal Communications Commission regulations. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.5-1 through MM4.5-8 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new hazards and hazardous materials impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and   Planning Commission 1 – 107 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 509 4/1/2025 January 2025 33 Environmental Analysis proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts to hazards and hazardous materials are not exacerbated. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to hazards and hazardous materials. 5.6 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section analyzes the effects to hydrology and water quality from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on or off site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? g. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? h. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? i. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? j. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? TZC EIR Conclusions • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map, and is not within the 100-year or 500- year flood hazard area. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not within the 100-year flood hazard area, (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located in the flood inundation area of the Prado Dam or the Santiago Dam. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not expose people to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow because the project site is not located near a coastal area, large water body, or   Planning Commission 1 – 108 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 510 4/1/2025 January 2025 34 Environmental Analysis unstable and exposed hills or slopes. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would not violate water quality standards, waste discharge, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. (Impact 4.6-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The majority of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is already developed and because the project area is not used for groundwater recharge, the operation of future development under the proposed project would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. (Impact 4.6-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation with mitigation) • Development under the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could alter the existing drainage pattern of the area and potentially result in erosion and siltation. (Impact 4.6-3: Less Than Significant) • Future development in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could alter the existing drainage pattern and potentially result in increased downstream flooding through the addition of impervious surfaces, or exceeding the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. (Impact 4.6-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.6-1 In order to comply with the current version of the Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP), future development projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area shall prepare Storm Drain Plans, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) conforming to the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or Environmental Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Agency for review and approval. a. A SWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements of each phase of the development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the project is completed. The SWPPP shall include treatment and disposal of all dewatering operation flows, and for nuisance flows during construction. The SWPPP may include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following applicable measures: o Minimum required pavement widths for residential streets needed to comply with all zoning and applicable ordinances o Use permeable materials for private sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, or interior roadway surfaces o Reduce the overall imperviousness associated with parking lots by using pervious materials in spillover parking areas o Direct rooftop runoff to pervious areas and avoid routing rooftop runoff to the roadway or the stormwater conveyance system o Biofilters including vegetated swales and strips o Extended/dry detention basins o Infiltration basin o Infiltration trenches or vaults o Catch basin inserts   Planning Commission 1 – 109 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 511 4/1/2025 January 2025 35 Environmental Analysis o Continuous flow deflection/separation systems o Storm drain inserts o Media filtration o Foundation planting o Catch basin screens o Normal flow storage/separation systems o Clarifiers o Filtration systems o Primary waste water treatment systems o Dry Wells o Cistern b. A WQMP shall be prepared, maintained, and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program. The plan shall incorporate water quality measures for all improved phases of the project. (Impact 4.6-1 and Impact 4.6-3) MM4.6-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits for future development projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, applicants shall submit site-specific Hydrology and Hydraulic Studies to the Public Works Department for review and approval. If existing facilities are not adequate to handle runoff that may be generated by the proposed development, then the applicant shall propose feasible remedies to assure that adequate drainage facilities will be available prior to issuance of occupancy permits. The applicant may propose storm drain improvements to be constructed in order to meet project needs. If necessary storm drain upgrades cannot be implemented prior to issuance of occupancy permits, on site detention facilities or other methods acceptable to the City shall be included with new development projects to ensure that post-construction runoff does not exceed pre-development quantities. (Impact 4.6-4) MM4.6-3 During the design of individual projects, applicants shall minimize impervious area by incorporating landscaped areas over substantial portions of a proposed project area. Furthermore, impervious areas shall be directly connected to landscaped areas or bioretention facilities to promote filtration and infiltration of stormwater. (Impact 4.6-4) MM4.6-4 During the design of individual projects, applicants shall control structural source through storm drain stenciling and signage, coverage of trash area to minimize direct precipitation, efficient irrigation to minimize runoff into stormwater conveyance system, slope and channel protection to decrease potentials for erosions of slopes, and use of deep-rooted, drought tolerant plant species for erosion control. (Impact 4.6-4) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to within a 100-year flood hazard area, flood inundation area, inundation from the Prado Dam, a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would have no impacts (DEIR Section 4.6-3). Impacts related to interference with groundwater recharge (Impact 4.5-1), alteration to existing drainage patterns (Impact 4.6-3) and increased downstream flooding (Impact 4.6-4) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of specific development projects, introduce new land uses nor increase the intensity the existing uses. The new regulations would require liquid or   Planning Commission 1 – 110 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 512 4/1/2025 January 2025 36 Environmental Analysis solid wastes discharged from future development projects be properly treated and would therefore not pollute or contaminate any water courses or groundwater. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.6-1 through MM4.6-4 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new hydrology and water quality impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Therefore, there would be no new or more severe significant impacts to hydrology and water quality. 5.7 LAND USE This section analyzes the effects on land use from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Introduce new land uses that would result in conflicts of use? b. Physically divide an established community? c. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.? d. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? TZC EIR Conclusions • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area is not located within either a natural community plan or applicable habitat conservation plan. The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area does not contain any critical or sensitive habitat. (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • The Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not result in conflicts of use. (Impact 4.7-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not physically divide an established community. (Impact 4.7-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would conflict with the Santa Ana General Plan by adopting standards and land uses not currently allowed within the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area; however, as part of the proposed project, the General Plan would be amended to incorporate the proposed land uses and development standards. (Impact 4.7-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures All impacts were below the level of significance and mitigation measures are not necessary nor recommended.   Planning Commission 1 – 111 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 513 4/1/2025 January 2025 37 Environmental Analysis Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to conflicts with a natural community plan or applicable habitat conservation plan would have no impacts (DEIR Section 4.6.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact). Impacts related to incompatible land uses (Impact 4.7-1), potential to divide an established community (Impact 4.7-2), and conflicts with the Santa Ana General Plan (Impact 4.7-3) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. The proposed zoning ordinance amendments are consistent with various goals and policies of the Santa Ana General Plan, as required by Government Code Section 65860, by timely addressing current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing environmental justice and impacts were found to be less than significant. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be inconsistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC area. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: • Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles. • Resolving the conflict of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse. • Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses. • Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heave industrial facilities and emission sources. • Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC. • Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit high levels increased pollution near sensitive receptors within EJ (Environmental Justice) area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC. • Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors • Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area.   Planning Commission 1 – 112 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 514 4/1/2025 January 2025 38 Environmental Analysis Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through discontinuing nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. Implementation of the proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations does not trigger new land use impacts that might otherwise occur with a development project requiring preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR. The new regulations would provide that any nonconforming business that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to, frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints, or is not in good standing with the City, including, but limited to constant service calls or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including business license revocation or terminating utility services or connections. For the purposes of this section, “frequent” is defined as more than one violation, call, or complaint per month during any twelve month period, and “constant service calls” is defined as more than one service call per month during any twelve (12) month period. Thus, the project would not physically divide an established community, or conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Therefore, the project does not trigger new land use impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to land use.   Planning Commission 1 – 113 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 515 4/1/2025 January 2025 39 Environmental Analysis 5.8 NOISE This section analyzes the effects to noise from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. Cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d. Cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? TZC EIR Conclusions • The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport. (DEIR Section 4.8.3: Effects Found to Have No Impact) • Construction activities associated with the proposed project would generate noise levels that exceed the noise standards established by the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. (Impact 4.8-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the proposed project could expose noise-sensitive land uses to noise levels that exceed the standards established by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Impact 4.8-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors on or off site to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, (Impact 4.8-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Occupants of the proposed residential units would not be exposed to potentially significant vibration levels. (Impact 4.8-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Physical impact from an increase in ambient noise levels could occur from the construction activities associated with the proposed project, an adverse effect on the nearby residents would not occur. (Impact 4.8-5: Less Than Significant) • No temporary or periodic noise impacts to on- or off-site receptors due to operation of the project. (Impact 4.8-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Operation of the proposed project would not generate increased local traffic volumes that would cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. (Impact 4.8-7: Less Than Significant without mitigation)Operation of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) rail line would potentially expose noise-sensitive land uses located within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area to noise levels that exceed the standards established by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Impact 4.8-8: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) • Construction activities associated with the proposed project would generate or expose persons or structures to excessive groundborne vibration. (Impact 4.8-9: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures   Planning Commission 1 – 114 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 516 4/1/2025 January 2025 40 Environmental Analysis MM4.8-1 All construction activity within the City shall be conducted in accordance with Section 18-314(e) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-2 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that the following construction best management practices (BMPs) be implemented by contractors to reduce construction noise levels: Two weeks prior to the commencement of construction, notification must be provided to property owners within 300 feet of a project site disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffled according to industry standards and be in good working condition Place noise-generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses, where feasible Schedule high noise-producing activities between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. to minimize disruption on sensitive uses Implement noise attenuation measures, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible Construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent. If the City or the job superintendent receives a complaint, the superintendent shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action taken to the reporting party. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1) MM4.8-3 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that construction staging areas along with the operation of earthmoving equipment within the project area would be located as far away from vibration and noise sensitive sites as possible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-4 Each project applicant shall require by contract specifications that heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away from residential streets. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. (Impact 4.8-1 and Impact 4.8-9) MM4.8-5 When residential uses would be located in areas with noise levels in excess of 60 dBA CNEL (either through conversion of use/structure or new construction), the project applicant shall provide noise barriers around private open space areas, including patios and balconies, as necessary. The height and density of the barriers shall be sufficient to reduce the exterior noise levels within private open space areas to a CNEL of 65 dBA or less. (Impact 4.8-2)   Planning Commission 1 – 115 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 517 4/1/2025 January 2025 41 Environmental Analysis MM4.8-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, building plans shall specify the STC rating of windows and doors for all residential land uses. Window and door ratings shall be sufficient to reduce the interior noise level to a CNEL of 45 dBA or less, and shall be determined by a qualified acoustical consultant as part of the final engineering design of the project. (Impact 4.8- 2) MM4.8-7 Each project applicant shall provide proper shielding for all new HVAC systems used by the proposed residential and mixed use buildings to achieve an attenuation of 15 dBA at 50 feet from the equipment. (Impact 4.8-2) MM4.8-8 The City shall provide a written statement to each applicant for projects located within 400 feet of the SCRRA tracks that shall be provided for each residential unit and resident, notifying them of potential noise and vibration issues associated with the railroad tracks, including the following: Notice of Disclosure Each owner’s [or renter’s] interest is subject to the fact that trains operate at different times of the day and night on the railway tracks immediately adjacent to a project site; and that by accepting the conveyance of an interest [or lease agreement] in that project, owner [or renter] accepts all impacts generated by the trains. Posting of Notice of Disclosure in each residential unit. Prior to offering the first residential unit for purchase, lease, or rent, the property owner or developer shall post a copy of the Notice of Disclosure in every unit in a conspicuous location. Also, a copy of the Notice of Disclosure shall be included in all materials distributed for the Project, including but not limited to: the prospectus, informational literature, and residential lease and rental agreements. (Impact 4.8-8) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that no impacts related to the proximity public use airport would not result in impacts would result. Impacts related to exposure of sensitive receptors from excessive groundborne vibration (Impact 4.8-3), potentially significant vibration levels (Impact 4.8-4), ambient noise increase (Impact 4.8-5), periodic noise impacts (Impact 4.8-6), and noise from increased traffic volumes (Impact 4.8-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts from noise levels exceeding City noise standards (Impact 4.8-1) and exposure to noise-sensitive land uses (Impact 4.8-2) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts causing groundborne vibration and development exposure near the Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) rail line (Impact 4.8-8) and construction activities from project implementation (Impact 4.8-9) were found to be significant and unavoidable. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would limit daily operations times and days of week, and maximum noise that could be generated from existing uses. No industrial use shall generate ground vibration perceptible without instruments at any point along the property line of the site except for motor vehicle operations. No vibration shall be produced that is transmitted through the ground and is discernible without the aid of instruments by a reasonable person at the property lines of the site. Vibrations from temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that enter and leave the subject parcel are exempt from this standard.   Planning Commission 1 – 116 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 518 4/1/2025 January 2025 42 Environmental Analysis Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.8-1 through MM4.8-8 would continue to apply. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. This will result in a beneficial impact. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and unavoidable noise impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.9 POPULATION, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT This section analyzes the effects to population, housing and employment from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? TZC EIR Conclusions • Implementation of the proposed project would accommodate projected population and housing growth. (Impact 4.9-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Construction of development projects pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could displace existing people or housing. However, this displacement would not necessitate the construction of additional replacement housing elsewhere. (Impact 4.9-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures All impacts were below the level of significance and mitigation measures are not necessary nor recommended. Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to accommodating population and housing growth Impact 4.9-1) and displacement of existing housing (Impact 4.9-2) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require development of housing units. The new regulations would provide architectural standards to any future development that would regulate the manner in which individual parcels and blocks are developed to create diverse and pedestrian-oriented development that would be consistent with the TZC area. In addition, there shall be no increase in the number of dwelling units unless the site on which the structure is   Planning Commission 1 – 117 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 519 4/1/2025 January 2025 43 Environmental Analysis located complies with the off-street parking and open space requirements of the SAMC. Therefore, the existing less than significant population, housing and employment impacts would not result in new or different impacts nor would it increase unplanned growth and does not trigger new population and housing impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.10 PUBLIC SERVICES This section analyzes the effects to public services and recreational and park facilities from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection? b. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection? c. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? d. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for library services? e. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for park services? TZC EIR Conclusions • Construction of new projects pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would increase the demand for fire protection services, but it would not require the construction of new or physically altered facilities to accommodate the increased demand or maintain acceptable response times. (Impact 4.10-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the proposed project would increase the demand for police services, thereby requiring additional staffing, although it would not require the construction of new or physically altered facilities or personnel to accommodate the increased demand. (Impact 4.10-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Construction of new residential units within the project area would generate new students that could require the addition of new classroom facilities, thereby requiring   Planning Commission 1 – 118 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 520 4/1/2025 January 2025 44 Environmental Analysis new or physically altered facilities to accommodate additional students in Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) schools. (Impact 4.10-3: Less Than Significant) • Construction of new residential units within the project area would generate new library users that could require the addition of new library facilities. (Impact 4.10-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • All properties identified as having new development potential to be built out pursuant to the provisions of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) these new projects would generate a need for new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. (Impact 4.10-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.10-1 Prior to an issuance of a building permit, individual projects in the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area shall perform a water supply, fire flow test and fire protection system design analysis to ensure that proposed projects are in accordance to meet standard fire protection design requirements. (Impact 4.10-1) MM4.10-2 Any development that would exceed two stories in height shall submit site-specific security plans to the SAPD for review prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.10-2) MM4.10-3 No developer within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) boundaries shall utilize a frequency of 800 MHz, which is reserved for emergency services. (Impact 4.10-2) MM4.10-4 Individual project developers shall pay school impact fees prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. (Impact 4.10-3) MM4.10-5 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a residential development project, or change of use from non-residential to residential within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area, project applicants shall pay to the City of Santa Ana the Park Acquisition and Development Fee. (Impact 4.10-5) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to the provision of library services (Impact 4.10-4) and recreation park facilities (Impact 4.10-5) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to fire services (Impact 4.10-1), Police services (Impact 4.10-2) and generation of new school children (Impact 4.10-3) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.10-1 through MM4.10-5 would continue to apply. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to public services. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and public services impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.11 TRANSPORTATION   Planning Commission 1 – 119 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 521 4/1/2025 January 2025 45 Environmental Analysis This section analyzes the effects on transportation from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? f. Result in inadequate parking capacity g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) TZC EIR Conclusions • Operation of the proposed project would result in impacts related to neighborhood traffic in the adjacent residential areas to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.11-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would exceed standards established by the Orange County Transportation Authority within the study area. (Impact 4.11-2: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Development projects constructed pursuant to the standards contained within the Transit Zoning Code would not result in a change in air traffic patterns. (Impact 4.11-3: Less Than Significant) without mitigation • Development projects constructed pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not increase hazards due to a design future or incompatible uses. (Impact 4.11-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Development projects constructed pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could result in inadequate emergency access. (Impact 4.11-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development under the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would not result in inadequate parking capacity. (Impact 4.11-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The Transit Zoning Code would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. (Impact 4.11-7: Less Than Significant) • Long-term cumulative development under implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. (Impact 4.11-8: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development under implementation of the Transit Zoning Code would result in impacts related to freeway ramps in the vicinity of the Transit Zoning   Planning Commission 1 – 120 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 522 4/1/2025 January 2025 46 Environmental Analysis Code area. (Impact 4.11-9: Less Than Significant with mitigation and Significant and Unavoidable due to a public agency (Caltrans) approval other than the City) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.11-1 The City of Santa Ana shall, during any roadway improvement within the Transit Zoning Code boundaries, evaluate, consider, and implement as appropriate the traffic calming measure(s), including but not limited to the following: o Curb extensions at local intersections o Short medians at entries to wide streets o Traffic circles at oversized intersections o Speed humps o Turn restrictions (Impact 4.11-1) MM4.11-2 As part of the project, the City of Santa Ana and the project sponsors shall work with the transit providers to implement various transit-related measures to improve and expand bus system service within the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. These measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: o Adding bus stops to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area along existing roadways o Changing bus service headways to respond to increased demand o Changing bus service destinations to respond to changing demand o Adding local shuttle service for employees and patrons of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area o The details of bus service improvements shall be determined in coordination with OCTA. The following recommendations would help encourage public transit patronage for project-related trips: o Bus Stop Locations—Relocation of existing bus stops and the provision of additional bus stops should be considered to accommodate transit users at convenient locations. o Days of Operation—The City should work with OCTA to consider changes to route times to serve nighttime and weekend project visitors and employees. o Headway—The City should work w would be appropriate to reduce them Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. MM4.11-3 The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency shall monitor the traffic signals within the Transit Zoning Code study area once every five years to ensure that traffic signal timing is optimized. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-4 The City of Santa Ana shall institute a program for systematic mitigation of impacts as development proceeds within the Transit Zoning Code to ensure mitigation of the individual improvements. The program shall prescribe the method of participation in the mitigation program by individual projects and guide the timely implementation of the mitigation measures. The program shall include the following elements: A funding and improvement program should be established to identify financial resources adequate to construct all identified mitigation measures in a timely basis. All properties that redevelop within the Transit Zoning Code should participate in the program on a fair share per new development trip basis. The fair share should be based upon the total cost of all identified mitigation measures, divided by the peak hour trip generation increase forecast.   Planning Commission 1 – 121 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 523 4/1/2025 January 2025 47 Environmental Analysis This rate per peak hour trip should be imposed upon the incremental traffic growth for any new development within the Transitioning Code. The program should raise funds from full development of the Transit Zoning Code to fund all identified mitigation measures. The program should monitor phasing development of the Transit Zoning Code and defer or eliminate improvements if the densities permitted in the Transit Zoning Code are not occurring. Program phasing should be monitored through preparation of specific project traffic impact studies for any project that is expected to include more than 100 dwelling units or 100,000 sf of non-residential development. Traffic impact studies should use traffic generation rates that are deemed to be most appropriate for the actual development proposed. Properties within Santa Ana and within one-half mile of the Transit Zoning Code that redevelop to result in higher traffic generation should also participate in the program to insure equity. The City may elect to implement appropriate mitigation measures as a condition of approval of the proposed developments, where appropriate. All or part of the costs of these improvements may be considered to be a negotiated credit toward the program, however the program must be administered in a manner that assures that it can fund necessary improvements to maintain adequate level of service at all intersections within this study. If funding of priority improvements cannot be assured, credit for construction of lower priority improvements may not be assured or may be postponed until more program funds are available. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-5 Main Street at First Street—Install a second northbound and southbound left-turn lanes and a dedicated northbound right-turn lane for 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-6 Lacy Street at Santa Ana Boulevard—Install a traffic signal and provide exclusive left-turn lane for both northbound and southbound directions for both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-7 Lacy Street at First Street—Install a traffic signal for both 2030 and 2035 conditions, a traffic signal, and provide exclusive left-turn lane for both northbound and southbound directions for both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-8 Santiago Street at Washington Avenue—Install a traffic signal and provide one exclusive left-turn lane for both eastbound and westbound traffic for 2035 conditions only. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-9 Santiago Street at Civic Center Drive—Install a traffic signal and provide: one exclusive left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through and right-turn lane on northbound and southbound approaches; and one exclusive left-turn lane and one shared through and right lane on eastbound and westbound approaches. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-10 Santiago Street at Santa Ana Drive—Construct a second southbound left-turn lane for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-11 Santiago Street a Fourth Street—Install a traffic signal. The lane configuration for the signal is recommended as 1 Left, 1 Through, 1 Through+ Right for all approaches. (Impact 4.11-8)   Planning Commission 1 – 122 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 524 4/1/2025 January 2025 48 Environmental Analysis MM4.11-12 Standard Street at First Street—Construct third eastbound and westbound shared through-right lanes for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-13 Grand Avenue at Santa Ana Boulevard—Construct a third southbound through lane and eastbound right-turn overlap signal phasing. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-14 Grand Avenue at First Street—Construct a third eastbound shared through/right- turn lane, a third westbound shared through/right-turn lane, and a third northbound through lane with dedicated northbound right-turn lane for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-15 Grand Avenue at I-5 Northbound Ramps—Construct a second westbound right-turn lane and for the I-5 northbound off ramp under both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) MM4.11-16 I-5 at Santa Ana Blvd.—Northbound Off-Ramp—The City of Santa Ana Department of Public Works shall coordinate with Caltrans for the installation of a second ramp lane for the I-5 northbound off ramp. The improvement shall be implemented to mitigate 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-9) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to exceeding standards from the Orange County Transportation Authority (Impact 4.111-2), change in air traffic patterns (Impact 4.11-3), hazards due to a design future or incompatible uses (Impact 4.11-4), inadequate emergency access (Impact 4.11-5), inadequate parking capacity (Impact 4.11-6), and alternative transportation (Impact 4.11-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to neighborhood traffic (Impact 4.11-1) and traffic increases to the existing traffic load (Impact 4.11-8) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to development near freeway ramps (Impacts 4.11-9) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.11-1 through MM4.11-16 would continue to apply. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would provide recharging spaces for electric vehicles. Also, all truck parking areas must be on paved surfaces and the parking, loading or unloading of trucks associated with a business on public streets is prohibited. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. This will result in a beneficial impact to transportation. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant and unavoidable transportation impacts would not result in new or different impacts. 5.12 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This section analyzes the effects to utilities and service systems from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project:   Planning Commission 1 – 123 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 525 4/1/2025 January 2025 49 Environmental Analysis a. Require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? b. Require new or expanded water entitlements and resources if there are not sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources? TZC EIR Conclusions • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would generate an additional demand for water, but would not require water supplies in excess of existing entitlements and resources or result in the need for new or expanded entitlements. (Impact 4.12-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not require or result in the construction of new or expanded water treatment facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. (Impact 4.12-2: Less Than Significant)without mitigation • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Orange County Sanitation District. (Impact 4.12-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) could require the construction of new or expanded wastewater conveyance systems, the construction of which would not cause significant environmental effects. (Impact 4.12-4: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would not increase wastewater generation such that treatment facilities would be inadequate to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. (Impact 4.12-5: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not generate solid waste that exceeds the permitted capacity of landfills serving the area. (Impact 4.12-6: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development under the implementation of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. (Impact 4.12-7: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would increase the demand for electricity and gas, but would not require or result in the construction of new energy production or transmission facilities, the construction of which could cause a significant environmental impact. (Impact 4.12-8: Less Than Significant without mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.12-1 Individual project applicants shall prepare site-specific sewer evaluations, including flow monitoring and modeling, during the project design to determine the adequacy of the existing sewer pipe capacity in the affected project area lines. The evaluation shall be submitted to the City of Santa Ana or OCSD, as appropriate, for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Any recommendations made in the site-specific sewer evaluations shall be incorporated into the design of each individual project. (Impact 4.12-4)   Planning Commission 1 – 124 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 526 4/1/2025 January 2025 50 Environmental Analysis MM4.12-2 Individual non-residential project applicants are encouraged to apply for Southern California Edison’s “Savings By Design” program. The program is aimed at generating an overall reduction in energy use through design methods and incentive programs by maintaining a 15% or greater exceedance of Title 24. (Impact 4.12-8) MM4.12-3 Individual development projects within the boundaries of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) shall implement energy conservation measures (such as energy-efficient lighting and microprocessor controlled HVAC equipment) to reduce the demand for electricity and natural gas as part of the project design. The energy conservation measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed, or if current technology becomes obsolete, through replacement and shall be reviewed by the Planning and Building Agency prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.12-8) MM4.12-4 Individual development projects within the boundaries of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) shall implement energy conservation measures (such as energy-efficient lighting and microprocessor controlled HVAC equipment) to reduce the demand for electricity and natural gas as part of the project design. The energy conservation measures shall be subject to modification as new technologies are developed, or if current technology becomes obsolete, through replacement and shall be reviewed by the Planning and Building Agency prior to issuance of a building permit. (Impact 4.12-8) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that impacts related to additional water demand (Impact 4.12-1), expanded water treatment facilities (Impact 4.12-2), exceed wastewater treatment requirements (Impact 4.12-3), increase wastewater generation (Impact 4.12-5), generate solid waste exceeding permitted capacity (Impact 4.12-6), and compliance with applicable federal, state, and local solid waste regulations (Impact 4.12-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to new or expanded wastewater conveyance systems (Impact 4.12- 4) and an increased demand for electricity and gas (Impact 4.12-8) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. Mitigation measures MM4.12-1 through MM4.12-4 would continue to apply. The new regulations identified in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would provide any nonconforming business that operates in an unlawful manner, including but not limited to, frequent code violations, police calls, or loitering complaints, or is not in good standing with the City, including, but limited to constant service calls or lapses in Business License renewal, will lose its nonconforming status, enabling the City to take corrective action as it deems appropriate, including business license revocation or terminating utility services or connections. Also, in addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated which will result in a beneficial impact to utilities and service systems. Therefore, the existing less than significant utilities and service systems impacts would not result in new or different impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.13 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE This section analyzes the effects to global climate change from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project:   Planning Commission 1 – 125 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 527 4/1/2025 January 2025 51 Environmental Analysis a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas? TZC EIR Conclusions • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code at full build-out would result in significant localized air quality impacts for operational level emissions. As a whole, this impact is significant for operational emissions due to the size of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.13-1: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code at full build-out has the potential to conflict with AB 32. The Project as a whole is significant for operational emissions due to the size of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area. (Impact 4.13-2: Significant and Unavoidable and no feasible mitigation) TZC EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.13-1 All diesel fueled construction equipment shall be classified EPA Tier II or better emission efficiencies. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-2 All construction equipment shall be shut off when not in use and shall not idle for more than five minutes, unless actively engaged in construction activities. MM4.13-3 Queuing of trucks on- and offsite shall be limited to periods when absolutely necessitated by grading or construction activities. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-3 Queuing of trucks on- and offsite shall be limited to periods when absolutely necessitated by grading or construction activities. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-4 All on-road construction trucks and other vehicles greater than 10,000 pounds shall be shut off when not in use and shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-5 To the extent feasible, all diesel- and gasoline-powered construction equipment shall be replaced with equivalent electric equipment. MM4.13-6 Project plans and specifications shall include policies and procedures for the reuse and recycling of construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard). (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-7 Project plans and specifications shall include education for construction workers about reducing waste and using available recycling services. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-8 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures meets or exceeds the most recent Title 24 requirements (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards), subject to review by the City Building Official. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency and Building Official for review and approval prior to issuance of the permit. Installation of the identified design features or   Planning Commission 1 – 126 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 528 4/1/2025 January 2025 52 Environmental Analysis equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to certificate of occupancy. The following design features should be considered by the applicant as a way to achieve Title 24 compliance in excess of the minimum requirement: o Increase in insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging is minimized o Limit air leakage through the structure or within the heating and cooling distribution system to minimize energy consumption o Incorporate dual-paned or other energy efficient windows o Incorporate energy efficient space heating and cooling equipment o Incorporate energy efficient light fixtures o Incorporate energy efficient appliances o Incorporate energy efficient domestic hot water systems o Incorporate solar panels into the electrical system o Incorporate cool roofs/light-colored roofing Or other measures that will increase the energy efficiency of building envelope in a manner that when combined with the other options listed above exceeds current Title 24 Standards (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non Residential Buildings, as amended September 11, 2008; Cool Roof Coatings performance standards as amended September 11, 2006) by a minimum of 20 percent. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-9 Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicants for individual projects shall provide a landscape plan that includes shade trees around main buildings, particularly along southern elevations where practical, and will not interfere with loading dock locations or other operational constraints. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-10 All showerheads, lavatory faucets, and sink faucets within the residential units, and where feasible within non-residential developments, shall comply with the California Energy Conservation flow rate standards. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-11 Low-flush toilets shall be installed within all Congregate Care units as specified in California State Health and Safety Code Section 17921.3. MM4.13-12 Project designers should consider design features to incorporate light-colored roofing materials that will deflect heat away from the building and conserve energy. (Impact 4.3- 1) MM4.13-13 Landscape designers shall ensure that landscaping of common areas for Industrial/Commercial projects uses drought-tolerant and smog-tolerant trees, shrubs, and groundcover to ensure long-term viability and conserve water and energy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-14 Landscape designers shall ensure that the landscape plan for Industrial/Commercial projects includes drought resistant trees, shrubs, and groundcover within the parking lot and perimeter. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-15 Individual project applicants shall ensure that designs for Industrial/Commercial projects include all illumination elements to have controls to allow selective use as an energy conservation measure. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-16 The applicant for Industrial/Commercial projects should promote ride sharing programs such as, but not necessarily including, publishing ride sharing information for all of   Planning Commission 1 – 127 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 529 4/1/2025 January 2025 53 Environmental Analysis the tenants, designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a website or message board for coordinating rides. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that measures have been included to provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience pursuant to SAMC Chapter 41 regarding bicycle parking standards and Chapter 16 of the Santa Ana Citywide Design Guidelines regarding Bikeway Support Facilities Guidelines. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the City Building Official for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-17 Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that all Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects’ interior building lighting supports the use of compact fluorescent light bulbs or equivalently efficient lighting to the satisfaction of the Building Official. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-18 Applicants for Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects shall consider providing preferential parking spaces for ultra-low emission vehicles and alternative fueled vehicles to encourage the use of alternative fuels and ultra-low emission vehicles. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-19 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed Multi-family/ Industrial/Commercial uses building or structure designs incorporate exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public/common areas pursuant to the adopted standards. Documentation of compliance with this measure shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency for review and approval. Installation of the identified design features or equipment will be confirmed by the City Building Official prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-20 All common area irrigation areas for Multi-family/Industrial/Commercial projects shall consider systems that are capable of being operated by a computerized irrigation system which includes an onsite weather station/ET gage capable of reading current weather data and making automatic adjustments to independent run times for each irrigation valve based on changes in temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, rain, and wind. In addition, the computerized irrigation system shall also consider the ability to be equipped with flow-sensing capabilities, thus automatically shutting down the irrigation system in the event of a mainline break or broken head. These features will assist in conserving water, eliminating the potential of slope failure due to mainline breaks, and eliminating over-watering and flooding due to pipe and/or head breaks. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-21 Consideration of installation of solar roofs on homes and businesses to offset the increasing demand for energy and natural gas. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-22 Project applicants shall, where feasible, incorporate passive solar design features into the buildings, which may include roof overhangs or canopies that block summer shade, but that allow winter sun, from penetrating south facing windows. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-23 Use Energy Efficient Roofing Materials. All roofing materials used in commercial/retail buildings at the Mixed-Use Retail Development shall be Energy Star® certified. All roof products shall also be certified to meet American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) high emissivity requirements. (Impact 4.3-1) MM4.13-24 All commercial/industrial projects shall, where feasible, include up to 10% renewable energy sources within the project. (Impact 4.3-1)   Planning Commission 1 – 128 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 530 4/1/2025 January 2025 54 Environmental Analysis MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-24 would also apply to this impact. (Impact 4.3-2) Project Analysis and Conclusion The City determined that long-term development related to localized air quality impacts from operational emissions (Impact 4.13-1) and operational emissions due to the size of the TZC area with the potential to conflict with AB 32 (Impact 4.13-2) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project Mitigation measures MM 4.13-1 through MM4.13.24 would continue to apply. The new regulations in Table 1 – Current and Proposed Text Regulations would provide that no land use shall generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere and that uses, activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emits dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. This will result in a beneficial impact to climate change/greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the existing significant and unavoidable global climate change impacts would not result in new or different impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. 5.14 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Would the project: a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? As detailed herein, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR is not appropriate for the project because none of the criteria permitting such a document under State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 are met. Project implementation does not include nor require implementation of specific development projects. The majority of the City is urbanized, with residential and nonresidential development, and mobility and public facilities all contributing to Santa Ana’s existing built environment. The proposed text amendments to SAMC Sections 41-2001, 41-2001.5, 41-2002, 41-2004, 41- 2005, 41-2006, 41-2008, 41-2009, and 41-2008 would merely update to clarify that the   Planning Commission 1 – 129 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 531 4/1/2025 January 2025 55 Environmental Analysis regulations apply to existing uses, further limit some rehabilitation of existing buildings and structures, clarify the effects of amendments to the TZC, further limit certain existing operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses, and to establish regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial uses. Section 41-2001.5 is updated to encompass new SAMC Section 21-2009, which establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. Section 41-2004 deletes the Overlay I-OZ zone from the text and map. Implementation of these SAMC amendments would not require implementation of any specific developments or direct physical changes to the environment, and therefore would not be in conflict with the GPU and no intensification of land uses would result. The City of Santa Ana, which includes the TZC area, is not within a NCCP/HCP area, and therefore would not conflict with an adopted NCCP/HCP plan. No direct or indirect substantial adverse effects on human beings would occur. 5.15 CONCLUSION This project proposes amendments to the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) by way of ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03. These proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Refer to Section 3.0 – Description of the Proposed Project. This project would not result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in the TZC FEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts have been identified because the project basically limits industrial uses and would not lead to the expansion or intensification of new, expanded or more intensive uses. Therefore, there will be no new or more severe impacts as the result of the implementation of this project, beyond the impacts that have already been analyzed in the TZC FEIR. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decision-making body of the lead agency must consider the whole of the data presented in the TZC FEIR. As outlined in this Addendum analysis, all impacts of the project were fully examined in the TZC FEIR, and the proposed changes do not require substantial changes to the prior-certified EIR or previously adopted mitigation measures. Therefore, the preparation of an Addendum to the existing certified EIR is the appropriate CEQA document to support the City’s consideration of the project, as outlined in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164.   Planning Commission 1 – 130 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 532 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/pb Item # 1 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Planning Commission Staff Report February 24, 2025 Topic: Resolution to make findings and adopt Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024- 03 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) addressing industrial land uses, nonconformities, and operating standards, and amending the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map to remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 district boundary. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Recommend that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: 1) Adopt a resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and to adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100). Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), and based on independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, that, in exercising its independent judgement, amend TZC SD-84 Final EIR with an addendum that the City Council find that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the adoption of the proposed Ordinances; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR was accordingly prepared. 2) Adopt an ordinance to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 amending certain sections of Article XIX (The Transit Zoning Code, Specific Development No. 84 (SD-84)) of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code including amendments to the regulations, overlay districts and maps in the zoning district; modifying the authorized land uses and permit types; establishing revised non-conforming use regulations, including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process and adding operational standards for certain permitted and non-conforming uses. 3) Adopt an ordinance to approve Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 amending the zoning by removing the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. Exhibit 6: February 24, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report (without attachments)_____________________________________________________________________   Planning Commission 1 – 131 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 533 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 2 3 3 6 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the SD- 84 Zoning District. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the moratorium. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code as necessary to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Based upon this City Council direction, and the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared Ordinances amending certain sections of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Article XIX. The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District. The first Ordinance proposes amendments that would modify the list of land uses and permit types, including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations, including the addition of an amortization process/termination of use process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps. The second Ordinance deletes the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 Zoning District boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map. DISCUSSION The Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development No. 84 The Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The TZC includes the Civic Center, Downtown, and the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and as established residential communities. The TZC is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. Prior to the implementation of the TZC, the area consisted of a wide range of civic, commercial, industrial, and residential land uses regulated by varying zoning districts. In June 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2804, creating the TZC, which purpose was to establish a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the   Planning Commission 1 – 132 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 534 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 3 3 3 6 7 existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. In July 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2970, amending the TZC to modify certain design criteria regulating height, massing, open space location, driveway standards, lot dimensions, and parking alternatives. The amendment did not include changes to land uses or permit types within the TZC. When originally adopted, the TZC provided new zoning for all properties contained within its boundary. However, some properties with existing M1 and M2 zoning and/or exiting industrial businesses, also received an overlay district designation which allowed for the continuation of industrial land uses on those properties. The development of mixed-use on these properties consistent with the new zoning they received as part of the TZC adoption is at the discretion of the property owner. In support of the TZC, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. However, due to the continued application of the industrial overlay zones within the TZC, the implementation of the new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts with the new General Plan. Since establishment of the TZC, and specifically in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, undergone expansions or intensifications, and have continued to create numerous land use conflicts and disturbances that affect surrounding residential communities. Specifically, in the Logan neighborhood alone, these land uses create quality of life, health and safety, and other trespass issues for residential properties that often directly abut these industrial land uses. These issues include odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts that have taken place for nearly a decade and a half despite the change to the new General Plan land use designations. Historically Disadvantaged Communities and Senate Bill (SB) 1000 Prior to the adoption of the TZC, the City permitted industrial uses within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools. The Logan neighborhood represents one of Orange County’s oldest barrios, established as early as 1886, and was one of the few areas where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent could purchase land due to racially restrictive covenants during the first half of the 20th century. Further, as a neighborhood, the area was established before the modern practice of separating or regulating impactful land uses, also known as zoning. The Logan neighborhood itself was largely settled by 1900, before the practice of zoning was enshrined by Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926. By that time, the neighborhood contained a mix of residential, industrial, commercial, and related land uses, in some cases side-by-side, with issues further exacerbated by rail lines, fuel storage depots, and the construction of the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5) between 1947 and 1956.   Planning Commission 1 – 133 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 535 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 4 3 3 6 7 Comprehensive data analysis and mapping tools generated by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), the Center for Diseases Control/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and California Healthy Places Index (HPI) reveal concerning information regarding environmental conditions impacting residents in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Recent CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data confirms that these neighborhoods rank at 90 percent or above among California’s most pollution-burdened communities, with Environmental Justice (EJ) maps showing higher exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Air Toxics Cancer Risk, Hazardous Waste Proximity, Diesel Particulate Matter, and Toxic Releases to Air. This information is included as Exhibit 4 to this staff report. These multiple sources of environmental exposure and pollution burden communities of color, including the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, present an alarming set of challenges that affect residents’ quality of life and life expectancy with continued heavy industrial uses nearby. Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2016, requiring local governments to address pollution and other hazards that disproportionately impact low-income and communities of color within their jurisdiction to proactively plan for and address environmental concerns when developing and updating components of the General Plan. The City and community worked to ensure that the new General Plan included SB 1000 requirements of addressing EJ through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options. Of note, the City’s new General Plan mixed- use land use designations in the TZC area were largely left intact, including those in the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods, when the General Plan Update was adopted in 2022. Environmental Justice/Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Profile: Logan and Lacy Neighborhood Impacts For the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, incompatible land uses allowed from past zoning decisions, including the industrial overlay zones, have perpetuated the practices of locating industrial uses or other noxious and unwanted uses near communities of color. The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods have a population of 5,907 within 1,564 households, a median household income of $56,864, average household size of nearly four persons, median age 27 years, and per-capita income of $23,495. Seventy-four percent are renter- occupied units based on demographic forecasts for 2023. Nearly 25 percent of the population is under 14 years of age and 14 percent are 55 years of age and older. Nearly three percent of the population attended up to 12th grade with no diploma, over 31 percent   Planning Commission 1 – 134 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 536 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 5 3 3 6 7 are high school graduates, and nearly 97 percent of the working population over 16 years of age are employed.1 These data illustrate that the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model. Failure to address ongoing irreconcilable land use conflicts that are the target of this moratorium will further exacerbate the ongoing demographic and environmental justice challenges that these two neighborhoods within the TZC have grappled with since their founding. Code Enforcement and Immediate Ongoing Issues In the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the TZC, the Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 35 commercial and industrial properties in the past 12 months and currently has 16 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. These violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby. Since June 2023, the TZC communities have experienced a marked increase in impacts stemming from the irreconcilable industrial and residential land use conflicts in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Residents in the TZC have voiced and emailed complaints and public health concerns to City staff regarding emitted contaminants and zoning violations from industrial businesses in the neighborhoods. Concerns that range from air pollution and smoke, toxic release exposures, idling trucks on residential streets, lead exposure, illegal storage, unpermitted uses, loud noise at night, and other property maintenance pose an immediate public health threat that is straining public resources to continuously investigate and address these matters. Specifically, a fire incident at a crematory located in the neighborhood alarmed neighbors at 9:18 p.m. on August 29, 2023. Residents shared with City officials’ video of high flames escaping the stack on the rooftop, screeching noise that continued nonstop for ten minutes, and what was described as a foul odor attributed to the fire. As City staff followed up with external regulatory agencies issuing permits to operate this facility, and quickly, staff observed the limitations from regulatory agencies and their compartmentalized processes to investigate and act on enforcement measures. On August 9, 2024, the City received a complaint with photos of 1 ESRI Community Analyst summary data, which utilizes U.S. Census Bureau sources (2017-2021 American Community Survey & 2020 Decennial Census Data), enhanced by ESRI’s forecasts and aggregations, covering demographics like population, income, age, and employment.  Planning Commission 1 – 135 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 537 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 6 3 3 6 7 the the same crematory in which the complainant observed bodies stored in a container outside the facility. A City code enforcement inspector issued an abatement notice that same day; the bodies and container were removed and the case was closed on August 13, 2024 by code enforcement staff. Since 2022, the City has enhanced community services by restructuring its Planning Division to contain a Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section, which oversees, among other functions, environmental justice efforts in Santa Ana and regional coordination to address such issues. Staff encountered difficulty in achieving desired enforcement outcomes with external regulatory agencies such as South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Department of Consumer Affairs Cemetery and Funeral Bureau (CFB), and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) with several heavy industrial business operators in the TZC. This is supported through internal correspondence and phone conversations with staff from these agencies to understand their investigation and compliance processes. To address issues of industrial operators, including recycling and waste processing facilities near schools and residential areas, the City adopted new regulations such as a Noxious Uses Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS- 3044, adopted June 20, 2023) to include a notification requirement to the City by the property owner to obtain a permit from a regulatory public agency; a requirement of a 1,000 linear foot distance buffer measured from the outermost boundary of the subject property; and a conditional use permit requirement from a regulatory public agency to handle, store, emit, or discharge particulate materials, exhaust emissions, or regulated compounds, or chemicals near a public park, school (K-12), or property zoned for residential purposes. City staff have also researched commercial real estate acquisition data and current for- sale properties to identify any trends that could potentially generate an increase in the application of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance for proposed or expanded industrial uses. From September 2022 to date, 15 properties (six commercial, three office, and six industrial businesses) sold. Three of those businesses (800-808 E. Washington Avenue, 1045 N. Fuller Street, and 923 N. Logan Street) are located in the Logan neighborhood. Currently, multi-tenant industrial and manufacturing warehouse spaces on the market for lease located in the TZC. Recent City Council Actions and Direction to Address TZC Land Use Conflicts On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within the TZC through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of the moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods within the TZC. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the moratorium.   Planning Commission 1 – 136 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 538 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 7 3 3 6 7 On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-3064 to extend the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code as necessary to provide sufficient time for staff to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. As part of its approval, the City Council expressed a desire for City staff to begin evaluating permanent solutions to the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area in as timely a manner as possible, which resulted in immediate evaluation of the zoning code text and map amendments consistent with direction provided for City Council consideration as part of this request. Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the Moratorium, City staff conducted an interagency meeting that included representatives from multiple City departments: the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Additionally, engagement with additional agencies such as the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD), Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities interface with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that application of the moratorium affects approximately 127 industrial businesses in the TZC. All businesses must obtain appropriate permits before operating: commercial locations require a Certificate of Occupancy from the Planning Department, while residential-based operations need a Home Occupation Permit. Of the affected businesses, approximately three have active applications for permits, primarily seeking to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties. City staff reviewed public safety data from SAPD and OCFA to assess community concerns regarding emergency responses in the TZC. SAPD records show a total of 18,736 calls for service between March 2023 and July 2024, with 226 of those occurring between April and July 2024 within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. These calls encompassed a wide range of incidents, including patrol checks, disturbances, and traffic- related issues. Notably, 1,909 calls involved collisions, vehicle impoundments, domestic violence, and SAMC violations. OCFA data from 2022 to August 2024 indicates 238 calls for advanced life support emergencies. In 2022, 29 calls were related to respiratory issues, chest pain, and cardiac arrest, with a subsequent 7-percent increase in health- related calls in 2023. While the data reflects a broad spectrum of emergency responses, the concentration of industrial businesses in the TZC raises the possibility that some of these calls, particularly those related to respiratory issues and traffic incidents, may be influenced by industrial operations. Further analysis is needed to determine the specific correlation between industrial activity and public safety concerns in the area.   Planning Commission 1 – 137 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 539 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 8 3 3 6 7 OCFA data for 2024 reported 312 service calls in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. A substantial majority, exceeding 250, were EMS-related, indicating a high demand for emergency medical services. Other incidents included traffic and pedestrian accidents, fire responses (including unauthorized burning and a brush fire), and alarm activations. Some calls were cancelled or resulted in 'no incident found,' suggesting potential areas for improved dispatch accuracy. The volume and variety of these calls highlight the impact of the area's mixed land use, where dense residential areas, commercial activity, and industrial operations contribute to a wide range of emergency response needs. Currently, City staff have an internal process established which tracks and monitors incoming notice of compliance and notice of violations given to a particular business/operator. City Code Enforcement activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance continue being monitored at these facilities. Code Enforcement staff data reports show enforcement activity beyond the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the moratorium, 16 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. Recent code enforcement complaints on properties in the Logan neighborhood involve complaints for recurring unpermitted work and land use violations that involve large commercial vehicles blocking street access and impacting nearby residents. Code Enforcement Division follow-up has resulted in larger administrative citations, continued enforcement, and onsite meetings with business owners. Currently, 21 open code enforcement violations or compliance reviews from industrial businesses are recorded with the City of Santa Ana, underscoring the need for close monitoring within the TZC area. The profile highlights the critical role of regulatory agencies in overseeing these businesses to mitigate potential environmental and public health risks. Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies Data from outside regulatory agencies assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. On April 25, 2024, City staff initiated public records requests from outside regulatory agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and others responsible for issuing specific types of permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Such agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities,   Planning Commission 1 – 138 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 540 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 9 3 3 6 7 and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities for sites located within the TZC. The City has responses to its Public Records Act request from SCAQMD, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQB), and the Orange County Environmental Health Division Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Records show SCAQMD issued two notices to comply with one industrial business on August 2023 and April 2024 for failure to maintain records, such as temperature graphs, poundage logs, and source test data. SCAQMD issued several permits to construct and to operate to the new operator of this same facility, which is currently in compliance with SCAQMD. Two notices of violation to one industrial business for operating a paint spray booth without a valid permit to operate from SCAQMD. The report from the SARWQCB from 2023 shows five (5) active industrial businesses in the TZC that were in violation of their permit for providing a late report or incomplete and/or insufficient information for their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). Public records from the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for Orange County, spanning 2022-2024, reveal a pattern of non-compliance with environmental and hazardous materials regulations among industrial businesses within the TZC. While some 2023 violations related to Hazardous Material Business Plan staff training and reporting were later corrected, current records indicate four businesses still have multiple open violations. These ongoing issues include non-compliance with documentation for hazardous waste transportation and disposal, as well as deficiencies in industrial stormwater reporting requirements. Notably, records from 2022-2024 show repeated failures to submit required stormwater reports and deficiencies in hazardous waste management and emergency response planning, including missing documentation and training. These violations highlight potential risks to public health and the environment. The proposed amendments for the TZC aim to strengthen the City's land use regulatory oversight, providing a necessary tool to address these deficiencies and safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of the TZC community. Air emission complaints continue to be reported to SCAQMD. These complaints included one involving black smoke and another regarding unpermitted soil vapor extraction equipment onsite. SCAQMD staff has clarified that for air quality complaints they receive, their inspector is required to be physically present to observe the activity from the facility described in the complaint to determine if the complaint warrants further investigation or enforcement action in accordance with SCAQMD Rules 401 (Visible Emissions), 402 (Public Nuisance), and 403 (Fugitive Dust). Therefore, although community members continue to share concerns with City and SCAQMD staff, the turnaround time for an SCAQMD inspector to be physically present at an SCAQMD-permitted facility to investigate an air quality complaint, especially if a complaint is reported after working hours or on weekends, is ineffective in addressing the immediate needs of the community.   Planning Commission 1 – 139 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 541 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 10 3 3 6 7 Public Outreach Following City Council's extension of the SD-84 TZC Moratorium on May 21, 2024, the Planning and Building Agency has been developing proposed regulations for the TZC district, encompassing the Downtown, Lacy, and Logan neighborhoods. This effort includes updates to permitted uses (including the removal of industrial uses), operational standards, non-conforming use regulations (including a new amortization process), and reflects ongoing input from affected business owners, residents, community stakeholders, and industrial/commercial brokers gathered since July 2024, including a Community Information Meeting on October 22, 2024, and culminating in a series of meetings through February 20, 2025. The draft amendments to the TZC were released to the public on January 15, 2025, and were made available on the City’s Moratorium webpage. These amendments address the permitted uses table, nonconforming regulations, amortization, and operational standards, and are designed to prepare for the TZC Moratorium's expiration on April 15, 2025. Staff met with business owners and brokers on January 30, 2025, to discuss the draft regulations and met with the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods meeting on February 19, 2025, and again with a focus group of industrial businesses on February 20, 2025. Staff have continued to update the TZC (SD-84) Moratorium project webpage with additional updates, including the Study Session and Public Hearing Notice and recent Planning Commission’s Study Session PowerPoint presentation. City staff have also prepared two Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents to clarify information regarding the Moratorium, affected businesses, the proposed zoning amendments, legal concerns, community engagement, and opportunities to participate in the public hearing process. The first FAQ became available prior to the City’s project informational meeting on October 22, 2024, and the second FAQ is included with this staff report (Exhibit 5). Current Code and Proposed Amendments to Text, Figures and Maps Based upon the City Council’s actions and direction enacting the moratorium combined with the research and analysis of the issues herein, staff has prepared the proposed zoning ordinance (ZOA No. 2024-02) and zoning map (AA No. 2024-03) amendments. The proposed amendments would modify the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the addition of an amortization/termination of use process; amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; delete the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC boundary as designated on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map.   Planning Commission 1 – 140 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 542 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 11 3 3 6 7 Table 1: ZOA No. 2024-02 Current and Proposed Text Regulations Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Application of Article SAMC Section 41-2001 establishes the land uses and standards applicable to the TZC - primarily for new uses. The update to text of this Section clarifies that the regulations apply to existing uses, whether conforming or nonconforming, change in land use or tenancy requiring issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Organization SAMC Section 41-2001.5 establishes the contents and organization of the TZC regulations The update to the text is necessary to encompass the new Section 41-2009 (Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses). Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses SAMC Section 41-2002 establishes the regulations for nonconforming buildings, structures or uses within the TZC boundary. The provisions contain minimal limits for rehabilitation of buildings and structures and their expansion for both residential and non- residential uses. The update to text of this Section will further limit some rehabilitation of buildings and structures, with specific emphasis on nonconforming industrial uses. These updated provisions include: •Requiring rehabilitation or expansion of buildings and structures, occupied by any nonconforming use to comply with the new operational standards contained in Section 41-2009. •Prohibits expansion of a building or structure occupied by a nonconforming industrial use. •Discontinuation of nonconforming noxious uses through amortization. •Elimination of certain nonconforming uses and structures •Establishes a process for enacting amortization periods for eliminating certain nonconforming uses. •References to SAMC and State law for abatement of public nuisances. •Establishes authority for voluntary compliance agreements between the City and nonconforming uses. The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone SAMC Section 41-2004 establishes an overlay zone applied to M1 and M2 zoned properties located within the TZC boundary. Section 41-2004 is deleted in its entirety, removing the I-OZ Zone from the TZC to eliminate industrial land use type zoning altogether. Application for Discretionary Approvals SAMC Section 41-2005 establishes the process and timing of vesting for certain uses approved with a discretionary permit. Section 41-2005 is renumbered as 41- 2004, and the update to the text of this Section adds clarification for effects of the amendments to the TZC dependent upon status of an application in the City process of review, approval, and/or building permit issuance, if required.   Planning Commission 1 – 141 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 543 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 12 3 3 6 7 Code Section Title Existing Zoning Code Regulations Proposed Zoning Code Regulations Zones Established SAMC Section 41-2006 contains the regulations for zoning districts, land uses, and permit types within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section deletes the I-OZ Zone, including replacing Figure 2.1, the Regulating Plan (map) with a new Figure 2.1 removing the I-OZ Zone designation from all parcels within the TZC boundary. Uses Permitted SAMC Section 41-2007 provides the allowable land uses and permit types required to establish a land use by each zoning district within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section clarifies application of the use standards by zoning district as follows: •Modifies Table 2A containing the Use Standards by adding and reclassifying certain land use types appropriate to the TZC land use subcategories •Deletes certain land use types that are inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the TZC, including the deletion of the Small-Scale Industry land use subcategory in its entirety. Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-2008 primarily regulates new uses within the TZC. The update to the text of this Section further limits certain operations to ensure greater compatibility between residential and non-residential land uses. Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses SAMC Section 41-2009 is an entirely new set of regulations specific to existing nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC. The new Section establishes regulations for operation of any existing, legally established, nonconforming industrial use. The regulations cover general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. Definitions SAMC Section 41-2080 contains the definitions applicable to terms and land uses of the TZC. The update to the text of this Section provides clarification for certain land use types (artisan/craft product with limited on-site production, commercial recreation facility – indoor, and research and development), adds definitions for land use types (automobile repair, automobile service, business support services, craft and specialized automotive restoration service, pet day care facility and trade school), and deletes corresponding definitions for land use types that were deleted as part of the amendments to SAMC Section 41- 2006.   Planning Commission 1 – 142 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 544 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 13 3 3 6 7 Analysis of the Issues The proposed amendments to the Sections of the TZC under the topic headings of Application of Article, Organization, Application for Discretionary Approvals, and Definitions are largely to ensure internal consistency related to the more substantive changes being proposed for the TZC to address irreconcilable land use conflicts, described as follows: •Nonconforming Structures and Uses - Section 41-2002 regulates the nonconforming building, structure or use specifically within the TZC. The regulations are unique to the TZC and do not apply citywide. The regulations determine under certain circumstances when a nonconforming structure or use can rehabilitate both structural or nonstructural; or expand conditions that would allow expansion. Due to the concerns enumerated within this report related to nonconforming industrial uses within the TZC, the amendments to this section increasingly limit rehabilitation of structures to those types of improvements that address compliance with the new Section 41-2009 operational standards for nonconforming industrial uses; and disallow the expansion of any nonconforming industrial use. This Section also includes new provisions to establish a process for the discontinuance of nonconforming uses, specifically noxious uses, and the elimination of those uses or structures through an amortization hearing process. The tools that these new regulations provide are necessary to address the environmental impacts that lead to the adoption of the Moratorium, provide the framework to initiate the process to eliminate noxious industrial land uses from the TZC, and align with the adopted EJ policies of the General Plan. •The Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) Zone – Section 41-2004 created an “exception” zone for properties within the TZC that had already contained M1 or M2 industrial zoning, uses and structures, when the TZC was adopted in 2010. In order to be both consistent and to promulgate the new General Plan land use designations within the TZC, the removal of this overlay zone is necessary. The zone currently gives deference to the property owner of these parcels with an industrial overlay to decide when and whether to redevelop their properties in a manner that would remove the industrial structure and use, replacing it with an allowable use and conforming to the design standards of the TZC. Eliminating the I-OZ Zone will cause these properties to become nonconforming as to use and structure, subjecting them to the regulations as amended and added to Section 41-2002, including discontinuance of nonconforming use or structure though amortization. With the deletion of the entirety of the text of Section 41-2004, Section 41-2005 Application for Discretionary Approvals is renumbered as Section 41-2004. •Zones Established and Uses Permitted – Amendments to Sections 41-2006 and 41- 2007, respectively, include parallel deletion of the I-OZ Zone affecting the Regulating Plan (TZC zoning map) and the corresponding Use Standards tables regulating the land use and permit types for each of the remaining zones of the TZC. Table 2A categorizes land uses into broad subheadings for both residential and nonresidential land uses. The nonresidential land uses are further categorized into commercial-  Planning Commission 1 – 143 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 545 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 14 3 3 6 7 oriented versus industrial-oriented types of uses. The amendments will eliminate the Small-Scale Industry sub-category altogether, since the majority of these uses are industrial uses incompatible with residential uses. The purpose of the TZC is to promote transit-oriented mixed-use development, which pairs residential and nonresidential land uses either horizontally or vertically on a site or within a building. Compatibility of allowable land use types is critical, particularly given the history of the negative impacts from industrial uses remaining in the area and in close proximity to existing and new residential areas. Amending this Section also replaces the TZC zoning map figure to ensure consistency with the City’s Official Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Map in accordance with requirements of State law, Government Code Section 65860. •Operational Standards and Operational Standards for Nonconforming Industrial Uses – Section 41-2008 contains operational standards applicable to all uses within the TZC boundary. This Section is largely unchanged, with clarification and strengthening of certain regulations to address any possible industrial type function of an allowable land use type as listed in the tables of Section 41-2007. These amendments affected any possible manufacturing related activities, sound, screening walls and eliminated any vehicular service on Sundays. Section 41-2009 establishes new regulations governing existing industrial uses made nonconforming with the removal of the I-OZ Zone within the TZC, and include general standards, enclosed operations, air emissions and dust, light, glare, and heat, ground vibration, outdoor storage and screening, hazardous materials, liquid and solid waste, site maintenance, truck parking and loading, and hours of operation. The amendments to Section 41-2008 and creation of new regulations under Section 41-2009 ensure that existing nonconforming uses comply with very specific operational standards and/or face amortization that leads ultimately to discontinuance of use, effectively reestablishing the TZC area with residential uses and allowing certain nonresidential uses compatible to such residential and/or mixed-use development. Profile of Industrial Businesses Affected with Proposed Regulations The SD-84 Transit Zoning Code (TZC) area is characterized by a diverse mix of approximately 127 industrial businesses. These businesses range from automotive services (the most common industry type) and manufacturing to warehousing and recycling centers. Data compiled from city and external regulatory agencies, including CalEPA, SCAQMD, and CERS, reveal that these businesses operate under various permits related to hazardous materials, air quality, and water quality. Key business characteristics include the storage and use of hazardous materials such as motor oil, solvents, and various chemicals, as well as the operation of equipment like emergency generators and internal combustion engines. Notably, several businesses, particularly those engaged in manufacturing (spray booths, metal processing) and chemical storage, handle substances like xylene, resins, mineral oils, and acids, posing potential risks related to air and water contamination, as well as fire and health hazards. Heavier industrial operators, such as open air recycling and sorting facilities in the TZC have been creating a   Planning Commission 1 – 144 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 546 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 15 3 3 6 7 range of issues in the neighborhood. Issues range from: 1) air pollution – dust and participate matter from the sorting process that can become airborne, leading to respiratory problems and reduced air quality, VOCs released from decomposing materials, and odors; 2) water pollution from stormwater runoff that can carry contaminants, including debris, chemicals, or bacteria, from a facility to nearby waterways; 3) noise pollution from heavy machinery, trucks, and sorting equipment generating noise; 4) visual blight from the constant movement of trucks and equipment and from the piles of trash, debris, and recycling materials that detract from the aesthetic appeal of the community. The secondary effects affect residents’ quality of life with increased traffic hazards and living next to these heavier industrial uses and the risks being exposed to these issues on a daily basis. General Plan Consistency The proposed zoning ordinance amendments are consistent with various goals and policies of the Santa Ana General Plan, as required by Government Code Section 65860, by timely addressing current inconsistencies within an area of the City prioritized for addressing EJ. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be inconsistent with, that without such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM- 3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 (Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: •Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public health and quality of life; •Resolving the development of industrial land uses and sensitive receptors being in close proximity to each other that pose health hazards by eliminating an overlay zone that promulgated continuation of industrial uses without recourse; •Improving the health of the existing and future residents of the TZC by regulating the operations of noxious, hazardous, dangerous, and polluting uses by giving priority to the discontinuance of those uses; •Responding to overarching EJ policies to develop and implement land use and zoning strategies to separate existing sensitive uses from heavy industrial facilities and emission sources; •Continuing to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing land use conflicts and incompatible uses through the elimination of the I-OZ zone and associated industrial land use types from the list of allowable land uses within the TZC;  Planning Commission 1 – 145 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 547 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 16 3 3 6 7 •Developing and adopting new regulations to address facilities that emit increased pollution new sensitive receptors within EJ area boundaries, which includes areas of the TZC; •Avoiding potential land use conflicts in the future by prohibiting the location of noxious land uses in proximity to sensitive receptors; and •Creating a sustainable land use plan for the area that phases out land uses that are causing a substantial drain on City and other public agency resources in addressing the impacts from irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC area. Additionally, the proposed amendments implement and/or contribute to achieving the following specific action programs of the General Plan, most particularly directly addressing LU3.3 through the creation of a discontinuance of nonconforming industrial uses through amortization: LU1.1 - Development Code Update. Prepare a comprehensive update to the zoning code to ensure that the City’s zoning regulations align with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Update the Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay District to remove the portion within the 17th Street and Grand Avenue Focus Area. Update the Midtown Specific Plan. LU3.3 - Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses. CN1.4 - Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. CN1.7 - Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas. CN1.11 - Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. HE5.C – Healthy Neighborhoods Initiatives. Update the City’s zoning code development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences. HE44.A – Fair Housing. Ensure all City programs and activities relating to housing and community development are administered in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing.  Planning Commission 1 – 146 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 548 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 17 3 3 6 7 Santa Ana’s current General Plan champions implementation policies, including 77 EJ actions that address air quality, noxious uses, water safety, residential lead exposure in the soil, and other environmental public health conditions. The proposed Transit Zoning Code amendments align with both the General Plan's EJ policies and the original land use designations applicable to the area since the adoption of the Transit Zoning Code in 2010. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies and local governments to measure the environmental impacts of development projects or other major land use decisions, and to limit or avoid those impacts if possible. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states the following with respect to an Addendum to an EIR: a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. Additionally, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, states the following with respect to a Subsequent EIRs: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or  Planning Commission 1 – 147 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 549 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 18 3 3 6 7 (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A)The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B)Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C)Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D)Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. ZOA No. 2024-02 and AA No. 2024-03 are considered a project as defined by the CEQA. The City, as the Lead Agency, has determined that it is subject to CEQA guidelines and regulations (Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21000-21177). An Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearing House (SCH) No. 2006071100) has been prepared by the City. Based on its independent review and analysis, and the administrative record as a whole, and, in the exercising its independent judgement, hereby finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required for the proposed project; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to the Transit Zoning Code EIR is required for the adoption of the Ordinances. Specifically, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City finds on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that: (1) no substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified as complete, that shows any of the following: (A) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (B) significant effect previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (C)   Planning Commission 1 – 148 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 550 4/1/2025 ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) February 24, 2025 Page 19 3 3 6 7 mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) mitigation measures or alternative which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Additionally, as detailed in the General Plan Consistency subsection of this report, the proposed Ordinances are consistent with numerous General Plan goals and policies that were evaluated as part of the General Plan Update Program EIR. The proposed Ordinances also satisfy and further implementation actions of the General Plan Update. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Resolution of the City Council and Addendum to the TZC EIR 2. Ordinance for Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 3. Ordinance for Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 4. Environmental Health Data and Reports 5. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 6. City Council Staff Report and Exhibits for the Adopted TZC Moratorium 7. Copy of Public Hearing Notice Submitted By: Margarita Macedonio, Principal Planner Approved By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Acting Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency   Planning Commission 1 – 149 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 551 4/1/2025 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU CNS D A I L Y J O U R N A L C O R P O R A T I O N To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER. Please read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): Daily Journal Corporation Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California. Call your local Mailing Address : 915 E 1ST ST, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Telephone (213) 229-5300 / Fax (213) 229-5481 Visit us @ WWW.LEGALADSTORE.COM NUVIA OCAMPO CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR SANTA ANA, CA 92702 GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE SD-84 01/31/2025 Publication ONLINE NetTotal $2204.80 $551.20 $2756.00 BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE (951) 784-0111 DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027 SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 SAN JOSE POST-RECORD, SAN JOSE (408) 287-4866 THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355 THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486 THE INTER-CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 272-4747 Notice Type: Ad Description: COPY OF NOTICE 3891625 !A000007012806! The charge(s) for this order is as follows. An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an invoice. NOTICE OF STUDY SESSION & PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision-making process. This notice is provided consistent with applicable State and local law, in addition to being provided to those persons who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage those with questions or comments to contact us prior to either or both the Study Session and/or Public Hearing. Please be advised that the City will hold a Study Session concerning the following, more fully described below:Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning)during the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on the following date and time: Study Session Date:Monday, February 10, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM Further, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana will hold a public hearing to receive public testimony and take action on Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning). Public Hearing Date:Monday, February 24, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM Project Location :The area within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, as depicted in the attached map. Project Applicant:City of Santa Ana Proposed Project:Planning Commission recommendation that the City Council adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and to amend the City's Zoning Map. The proposed amendments include removal of industrial uses from the permitted uses table, updates to the nonconforming regulations, a new amortization process, and new operational standards applicable to businesses within the zoning district. The proposal also includes removing   Planning Commission 1 – 150 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 552 4/1/2025 the Light Industrial (M1)and Heavy Industrial (M2)suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district,as shown on the City's Zoning Map. En viron mental Impact:In accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines,an addendum has been prepared to the City of Santa Ana's Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Environmental Impact Report (EIR)to demonstrate that,pursuant to the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162,this project is within the scope of the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84)EIR No.2006- 02,State Clearinghouse (SCH)No. 2006071100,certified by the City of Santa Ana on June 7,2010.The Transit Zoning Code (SD-84)EIR fully analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed code amendments.This is consistent with Section 8.06 of the City's Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. Meeting Details:This matter will be heard in the City Council Chambers,22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana,CA 92701.Members of the public may at tend this me eting in person or join via Zoom.For the most up-to-date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting,please visit https://www.santa- ana.org/planning-and-building- meeting-participation/. Written Commen ts:If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments@santa- ana.org (reference the Agenda Item #in the subject line)or by mail to Nuvia Ocampo,Recording Secretary,City of Santa Ana,20 Civic Center Plaza ---M20,Santa Ana,CA 92701.Deadline to submit written comments is 3 :30 p.m.on the day of the meeting.Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information : Additional details regarding the proposed action(s),including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at https://santa- ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any project questions,please contact Principal Community Planner Margarita Macedonio with the Planning Division by phone at (714)667-2288 or by email at MMacedonio@santa- ana.org. Note:If you challenge the decision on the above matter,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at,or prior to,the public hearing. N u c n liên l c b ng ti ng Vi t,xi n i n tho i cho Kristie Ha (714)667- 2206. 1/31/25 CNS-3891625# ORA NGE CO UNTY REGISTER   Planning Commission 1 – 151 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 553 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF STUDY SESSION & PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision-making process. This notice is provided consistent with applicable State and local law, in addition to being provided to those persons who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage those with questions or comments to contact us prior to either or both the Study Session and/or Public Hearing. Please be advised that the City will hold a Study Session concerning the following, more fully described below: Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning) during the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on the following date and time: Study Session Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM Further, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana will hold a public hearing to receive public testimony and take action on Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning). Public Hearing Date: Monday, February 24, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM Project Location: The area within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, as depicted in the attached map. Project Applicant: City of Santa Ana Proposed Project: Planning Commission recommendation that the City Council adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and to amend the City’s Zoning Map. The proposed amendments include removal of industrial uses from the permitted uses table, updates to the nonconforming regulations, a new amortization process, and new operational standards applicable to businesses within the zoning district. The proposal also includes removing the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district, as shown on the City’s Zoning Map. Environmental Impact: In accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, an addendum has been prepared to the City of Santa Ana’s Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to demonstrate that, pursuant to the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, this project is within the scope of the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) EIR No. 2006-02, State Clearinghouse   Planning Commission 1 – 152 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 554 4/1/2025 (SCH) No. 2006071100, certified by the City of Santa Ana on June 7, 2010. The Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) EIR fully analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed code amendments. This is consistent with Section 8.06 of the City’s Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in person or join via Zoom. For the most up-to-date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building-meeting-participation/. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments@santa-ana.org (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or by mail to Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any project questions, please contact Principal Community Planner Margarita Macedonio with the Planning Division by phone at (714) 667-2288 or by email at MMacedonio@santa-ana.org. Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Kristie Ha (714) 667-2206. City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code Area   Planning Commission 1 – 153 3/6/2025       City Council 22 – 555 4/1/2025 28.Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (“SD-84”), Also Known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”) for Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a) Legal notice published in the Orange County Reporter on May 6, 2024. Department(s): Recommended Action: 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance extending a moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within SD-84, by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), for an additional 10 months and 15 days. UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) MONTHS AND FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project. Exhibit 8 - City Council Staff Report and Exhibits for the Adopted TZC Moratorium     City Council 22 – 556 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 28 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report May 21, 2024 TOPIC: Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 AGENDA TITLE Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (“SD-84”), Also Known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”) for Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a) Legal notice published in the Orange County Reporter on May 6, 2024. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance extending a moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within SD-84, by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), for an additional 10 months and 15 days. UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) MONTHS AND FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No     City Council 22 – 557 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 2 4 2 7 9     City Council 22 – 558 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 3 4 2 7 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 Zoning District through adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063. The purpose of this Moratorium was to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84) through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, proximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness. During the moratorium, the City is not issuing permits that result in the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the Transit Zoning Code (TZC). Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the Moratorium shall have no further force and effect 45-days from the date of its adoption, which was April 16, 2024, unless extended. An extension requires the City Council issue a written report ten days prior to the expiration of the Moratorium, or extension thereof, describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Moratorium, provide notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, and hold a public hearing. Government Code Section 65858(a) allows an extension for 10 months and 15 days and a subsequent extension for one year. An extension also requires a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. On May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the Moratorium. City staff has determined that an extension of the Moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days pursuant to the Government Code is necessary to continue with data tracking and reporting, research appropriate regulations, and coordinate with outside regulatory agencies and City departments to provide a complete analysis and thorough evaluation of the more than 130 industrial businesses within the TZC. An extension of the Moratorium would provide sufficient time to enable staff to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary and to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would address industrial land uses in the TZC.     City Council 22 – 559 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 4 4 2 7 9 DISCUSSION Background Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the Moratorium, staff conducted an interagency meeting, which included representatives from multiple City departments. These departments include the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Moreover, engagement with additional agencies such as the Police Department, Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities are intertwined with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that the application of the Moratorium affects more than 130 industrial businesses in the TZC. Of these, over one-dozen have active applications for permits, the majority of which are to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties and address ongoing Code Enforcement Division notices of violation. City staff continue to gather, review, and analyze information regarding affected industrial businesses within the TZC. Specific data and reporting pertains to applications submitted by industrial businesses for permits, entitlements, certificates of occupancy, business licenses, and other relevant records immediately prior to and following the adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance and currently under review by City staff. Requests for information on calls for service and incident activities responded to by public safety departments of the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) and the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) are being reviewed by City staff to understand and validate public safety concerns or impacts shared by neighbors in disadvantaged communities with actual calls and emergencies reported. Initial reports from the SAPD show calls for service in the TZC totaling 18,510 calls between March 2023 and April 2024. These calls for service included patrol checks, car stops, disturbances, alarm activation, trespassing, and many more types of calls for service. Of the 18,510 calls for service, 1,909 incidents reported were related to collisions, impounded vehicles, hit and run collisions, domestic violence, and Santa Ana municipal code violations. Similarly, data from OCFA shows 62 calls for service in 2022 and 66 calls for service for 2023 for a combined 128 calls for service for both 2022 and 2023 for advanced life support-related emergencies. Specifically, 29 of the service calls responded to by OCFA in 2022 were related to health stemming from respiratory concerns to chest pain and cardiac arrest, along with long-term diabetic issues and chest pains. In 2023, there was nearly a seven percent (7%) increase in the number of health-related calls OCFA responded to related to health issues.     City Council 22 – 560 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 5 4 2 7 9 In addition, City staff continue to monitor Code Enforcement Division activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance pertaining to these facilities. Code Enforcement staff will broaden data reports that show enforcement activity beyond the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the Moratorium, 17 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The amount of active open industrial cases, in close proximity to one another, during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance and harming the public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods. Since the adoption of the Moratorium, City staff have received multiple code enforcement complaints from community members about industrial businesses in the TZC area that were also reported previously before the adoption of the Moratorium. City staff have received repeated code enforcement and air emission complaints about facilities in the Logan neighborhood and are working with Code Enforcement Division and SCAQMD staff to obtain responses, investigations, or reports provided by the Code Enforcement Division and SCAQMD to the complaints reported. Recent code enforcement complaints on properties in the Logan neighborhood involve complaints for recurring unpermitted work and land use violations that involve large commercial vehicles blocking street access and impacting nearby residents. Code Enforcement Division follow-up has resulted in larger administrative citations, continued enforcement, and onsite meetings with business owners. Moreover, air emission complaints have been reported to SCAQMD. These complaints include one involving black smoke and another regarding unpermitted soil vapor extraction equipment onsite. Part of the jurisdictions that City staff are working with include SCAQMD staff to obtain updates regarding the status of these complaints. SCAQMD staff investigated one complaint that did not result in an enforcement action and is investigating the other complaint. SCAQMD staff has clarified that for air quality complaints they receive, their inspector is required to be physically present to observe the activity from the facility described in the complaint to determine if the complaint warrants further investigation or enforcement action in accordance with South Coast AQMD Rules 401 (Visible Emissions), 402 (Public Nuisance), and 403 (Fugitive Dust). Community members continue to share concerns with City and SCAQMD staff regarding the turnaround time for an SCAQMD inspector to be physically present at an SCAQMD-permitted facility to investigate an air quality complaint, especially if a complaint is reported after working hours or on weekends.     City Council 22 – 561 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 6 4 2 7 9 Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies To broaden the analysis beyond the City's local land use impacts, City staff have initiated public records requests from outside regulatory agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and others responsible for issuing supportive permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Such agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities, and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities and received current data requests for sites located within SD No. 84 that were initiated by City staff on April 25, 2024. Data from outside regulatory agencies will assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In response to the City’s request, SCAQMD clarified the need to process the records request by larger geographic areas, such as zip code area as an example, not specifically matching the boundaries of the TZC. The City has not received responses to its Public Records Act requests and once it does, additional time will be needed for City staff to carefully review and analyze the data in order to understand all activities (internal and external) and affected industrial businesses. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update and Neighborhood Engagement City staff continue to work with Project Consultant MIG to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent. In order to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code will likely be required. MIG and City staff have already conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts continue to indicate that there are irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area which are among the most pressing topics to be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. The Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section of the Planning Division continue to coordinate with City departments, outside regulatory agencies, and staff from other federal and state agencies to identify additional resources available to enhance deeper awareness of pollution exposure in disadvantaged communities, long-term health effects, and options for immediate     City Council 22 – 562 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 7 4 2 7 9 solutions. The NIES team has held meetings and discussions with staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and CalEPA Environmental Justice Team to identify opportunities for linking environmental justice (EJ) resources and support to the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. NIES staff also continue to coordinate with residents selected to represent the City’s EJ Clusters to complete the formation of the EJ Action Committee, the community-led EJ advocacy group. This group will help guide the prioritization and resource investments to implement the City’s General Plan EJ Policies and Implementation Actions. Next Steps During the Moratorium, staff will evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would permanently address industrial land uses in the TZC. Staff continues to receive, analyze, and prepare a thorough evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC. Staff has determined that an extension of the Moratorium for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), is recommended to provide the additional staff time and resources needed to implement a comprehensive evaluation of the industrial uses in the TZC utilizing the data reporting and tracking, regulatory research, enforcement reports, and department discussions to fully understand the effects of industrial uses in the TZC and to continue to address current and immediate threats to public health, safety, and welfare, due to growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts within the TZC. On May 7, 2024, a ten-day report was issued by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) and is attached and referenced as Exhibit A to the Ordinance attached to this staff report. The April 16, 2024 City Council Meeting staff report is included in this report as Exhibit 3, providing background on the issues and analysis on the original need for the Moratorium. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The extension of the Moratorium is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval,     City Council 22 – 563 4/1/2025 Extension of Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses in Specific Development No. 84 May 21, 2024 Page 8 4 2 7 9 commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of uses in Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Uncodified Urgency Ordinance Extending Moratorium for Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days 2. Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3036 adopted on April 16, 2024 3. April 16, 2024 City Council Staff Report and Exhibits 4. Public Notice Submitted By: Minh Thai, Planning and Building Agency Executive Director Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager     City Council 22 – 564 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 1 of 11 UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) MONTHS AND FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has the police power pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, to make and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urgency ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted a Moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (“SD-84”) also known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”) by adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. NS-3063 to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent residential neighborhoods in the TZC (SD-84) through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, proximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness; and WHEREAS, the Moratorium will expire on June 1, 2024 unless extended; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council, after notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, to adopt an ordinance extending the Moratorium for 10 months and 15 days, upon approval by a fourth-fifths vote, and upon making the same findings required for the adoption of the initial forty-five (45) day Moratorium; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858(d) requires the City Council, ten days prior to the expiration of the Moratorium or any extension thereof, to issue a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Moratorium; and     City Council 22 – 565 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 2 of 11 WHEREAS, on May 7, 2024, City staff prepared, and the City Council issued and filed a report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the Moratorium; and WHEREAS, Santa Ana Charter Sections 415 and 417 expressly authorize the City Council to enact urgency ordinances, which take effect immediately upon introduction, for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858, authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance with a four-fifths vote, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, in unanimously adopting the Moratorium on April 16, 2024, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana established the following findings, all of which below remain true and applicable and necessary to support extending the Moratorium: •The TZC, located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010; and •Upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; an d •The goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new and enhancement of existing communities through transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and     City Council 22 – 566 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 3 of 11 •Industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and •The TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were converted to the mixed-use zones allowed by the TZC; and •Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called “disadvantaged communities”, in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their gene ral plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and •The City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and •The Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana’s General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and •As required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all of its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and •Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP -1.9 (Avoid Conflict     City Council 22 – 567 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 4 of 11 of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and •The industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and •The Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican - American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century; and •The construction of Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in a number of families being displa ced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and •In the 1970s a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and •The Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and •Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and •The updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban     City Council 22 – 568 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 5 of 11 Neighborhood land use designations—both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and •There are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and •In the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and •In the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities     City Council 22 – 569 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 6 of 11 have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and •There is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very-low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and •There is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor’s yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and •The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofan o, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and •MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the     City Council 22 – 570 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 7 of 11 comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area; and •The policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and •Given these concerns, the City Council directed that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district; and •Based on the foregoing, the City Council found that continuing to issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property located in the TZC for the purposes of industrial business use, prior to the City’s completion of its study of the potential impact of such uses, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements in the TZC area is thus necessary; and •The City Council further found that if an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: o Adversely impacts surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; o Adversely impacts sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; o Conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; o Long-term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses; and o Risks to the public health, safety and welfare of the City; and •The City Council also determined that prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare required the immediate enactment of the urgency     City Council 22 – 571 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 8 of 11 ordinance and that the absence of the urgency ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which ma y be adopted by the City; industrial business uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated updates and revisions to the Code. Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and implementation would create impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the City Council, in adopting the ordinance, found to be unacceptable; and WHEREAS, Since the adoption of the Moratorium, City staff has begun to gather data and research the impact of these industrial uses in the TZC as set forth in the report issued by the City Council on May 7, 2204; and WHEREAS, there is a need to study further the issues associated with industrial uses in the TZC and the impact that these uses have on the adjacent residential neighborhoods and their residents; and WHEREAS, City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council each require a reasonable period of time to study the existing SD-84/TZC and to evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to extend the Moratorium for a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, or until the City Council adopts an ordinance addressing the issues raised, whichever occurs first; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 21, 2024, the City Council heard testimonial evidence and all other evidence submitted from members of the public that were present and from City staff. The City Council reviewed, analyzed, considered and studied all oral and written testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing, including staff reports and presentations of City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to public health, safety and welfare posed by industrial uses in SD-84, also known as, the TZC. If an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare due to adverse impacts on surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; adverse impacts on sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; conflicts with the goals and policies of the City’s General     City Council 22 – 572 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 9 of 11 Plan; and the effect of long term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses. Section 3. In accordance with Government Code Section 65858 (d), on May 7, 2024, the City Council issued a written report describing the measures being taken to alleviate the conditions that lead to the adoption of the Moratorium and this extension thereof, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim Urgency Ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health and welfare, prohibiting any uses that m ay be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission of the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Section 5. Government Code Section 65858(a) provides that the City Council, after notice and a public hearing, may extend the interim Ordinance for 10 months and 15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any extension requires a four-fifths vote. Section 6. The City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858 and Santa Ana Charter Sections 415 and 417 hereby adopts this uncodified Urgency Ordinance extending the Moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC for a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, commencing June 1, 2024. The Moratorium will now expire on April 15, 2025, or until the City Council adopts an Ordinance addressing the issues related to the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of industrial uses within SD-84, also known as the TZC. For the purposes of this Urgency Ordinance, “industrial uses” includes those specified by Divisions 18 and 19 of Article III of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and by Section 41-2007 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and Table 2A in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84). Section 7. This Ordinance shall have no further force and effect after a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, commencing June 1, 2024; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this Ordinance for a period of one more year. Section 8. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be punished as provided in Section 1 -8 of Chapter 1 of the Code. Section 9. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15061(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a     City Council 22 – 573 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 10 of 11 direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of uses in the zoning district. Section 10. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 11. This Ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The C ity Council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1 of this Ordinance. Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED this ___ day of ___________________, 2024. _______________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By:_____________________________ Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney     City Council 22 – 574 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 11 of 11 AYES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _______________________, 2024. Date: ________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk City of Santa Ana     City Council 22 – 575 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 15 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report May 7, 2024 TOPIC: Ten-Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 AGENDA TITLE Ten-Day Written Report Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d) Following Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, a 45-day Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 RECOMMENDED ACTION Issue and file a Council report to the public, pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, describing the City’s measures to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, on April 16, 2024, regarding a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code). GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pursuant to Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code, the purpose of this staff report is to provide a written report no less than ten days prior to the expiration of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 describing the measures City staff has taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Ordinance. On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063, which establishes a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in Specific Development No. 84, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (commonly referred to as the “Transit Zoning Code” or “TZC”) while City staff researches appropriate regulations and determines whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 shall have no further force and effect 45 days from the date of its adoption, unless, after a report on the first 45 days and a public hearing, the City Council members, again by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend the Ordinance Exhibit A     City Council 22 – 576 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 2 4 2 4 4 for an initial extension period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days. Based on the adoption date of April 16, 2024, the Ordinance is scheduled to expire on June 1, 2024. As City staff begins to analyze and prepare an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC, the evaluation will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether further, permanent action is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would address industrial land uses in the TZC. DISCUSSION Background On April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from industrial uses significantly causing pollution burden to adjacent neighborhoods through the following conditions, including: code enforcement active cases; irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC; alarming air quality, noise, traffic, proximity to noxious use facilities, and public health concerns; and external regulatory agency responsiveness. During the urgency interim moratorium period, the City will not issue permits that result in the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC. Measures Taken Review of City Department Activities Immediately following the adoption of the 45-day moratorium, staff conducted an interagency meeting, which included representatives from multiple City departments. These departments include the Planning Division, Building Safety Division, Code Enforcement Division, Business License, and Information Technology. Moreover, engagement with additional agencies such as the Police Department, Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency’s Economic Development Division has produced critical information illustrating the extent to which industrial activities are intertwined with residential land uses in the TZC area, specifically and most concentrated in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Data based on Business License and Economic Development records indicate that the application of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 affects up to 130 industrial businesses in the TZC. Of these, over one-dozen have active applications for permits, the majority of which are to legalize unpermitted work on industrial properties and address ongoing Code Enforcement Division notices of violation.     City Council 22 – 577 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 3 4 2 4 4 City staff continues to gather, review, and analyze information regarding affected industrial businesses within the TZC. Specific data and reporting pertains to applications submitted by industrial businesses for permits, entitlements, certificates of occupancy, business licenses, and other relevant records immediately prior to and following the adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance and currently being reviewed by City staff. Requests for information on calls for service and incident activities responded to by public safety departments of the Santa Ana Police Department and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) are being reviewed by City staff to understand and validate public safety concerns or impacts shared by neighbors in disadvantaged communities with actual calls and emergencies reported. In addition, City staff continues to monitor Code Enforcement Division activities and implementation of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance pertaining to these facilities. Code Enforcement staff will broaden data reports that show enforcement activity beyond the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, where at the time of adoption of the Urgency Interim Ordinance on April 16, 2024, 17 active open cases were issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. Such violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby. Review of Records and Activities of External Agencies To broaden the analysis beyond the City's local land use impacts, City staff have initiated public records requests of violation records and violation status of outside regulatory agencies, and have contacted staff from external regulatory agencies such as the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), Santa Ana Regional Quality Water Control Board, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and others responsible for issuing supportive permits for industrial uses in the TZC. Specifically, these agencies are responsible for permit issuance, compliance activities, and/or monitoring hazardous clean-up sites, or other industrial facility-related activities and have received current data requests for sites located within SD No. 84. Data from external regulatory agencies would assist City staff in further understanding activities between external regulatory agencies and industrial businesses that may place additional impacts on public health, safety, and welfare in affected neighborhoods adjacent to industrial businesses in the TZC. This information would enable City staff to understand the correlation and environmental burdens that may be attributed to permitted activities for industrial businesses in historically environmentally disadvantaged communities, specifically the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In     City Council 22 – 578 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 4 4 2 4 4 response to the City’s request, SCAQMD clarified the need to process the records request by larger geographic areas, not specifically matching the boundaries of the TZC. When reports become available to the City, additional time will be needed for City staff to carefully review and analyze other internal data to understand all activities (internal and external) and affected industrial businesses. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update and Neighborhood Engagement City staff continues to work with Project Consultant Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) to ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent and, to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required. MIG and City staff have already conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area. City staff from the Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section of the Planning Division will continue to coordinate with City departments, external regulatory agencies, and staff from other federal and state agencies to identify additional resources available to enhance deeper awareness of pollution exposure in disadvantaged communities, long-term health effects, and immediate solutions. The NIES team has held meetings and discussions with staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and CalEPA Environmental Justice Team to identify opportunities for linking environmental justice (EJ) resources and support to the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. In addition, the NIES team has been working with the residents selected to represent the City’s EJ Clusters to complete the formation of the EJ Action Committee, the community-led EJ advocacy group, to guide the prioritization and resource investments to implement the City’s General Plan EJ Policies and Implementation Actions. Next Steps Staff implements the 45-day moratorium established by Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 through ongoing interagency coordination. Moreover, staff will continue to analyze and prepare an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC, which will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether an extension of the 45-day moratorium is recommended. If an extension is recommended, it would be placed on the May 21, 2024 City Council agenda as a public hearing item, which is prior to the June 1 expiration date.     City Council 22 – 579 4/1/2025 Ten-Day Report Describing Measures Taken to Alleviate the Condition which Led to the Adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 (Transit Zoning Code Moratorium) May 7, 2024 Page 5 4 2 4 4 During the 45-day moratorium and any potential extension period, staff will evaluate if further, permanent action to address the land use conflicts in the TZC is necessary. Such action may entail a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, or both, which would permanently address industrial land uses in the TZC. Meeting Date Display FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBITS 1. Adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. NS-3063 2. April 16, 2024 City Council Staff Report Submitted By: Minh Thai, Planning and Building Agency Executive Director Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager     City Council 22 – 580 4/1/2025 ORDINANCE NO. NS-3063 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has the police power pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, to make and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urgency ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a four -fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and WHEREAS, Specific Development No. 84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010; and WHEREAS, upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed -use residential and commercial communities; and WHEREAS, the goals of the TZC are to provide a transit -supportive, pedestrian - oriented development framework to support the addition of new and enhancement of existing communities through transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and WHEREAS, industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 1 gth century, predating modern Ordinance No. INS - 3063 Page 1 of 8     City Council 22 – 581 4/1/2025 zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and WHEREAS, the TZC provides new mixed -use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were converted to the mixed - use zones allowed by the TZC; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called "disadvantaged communities', in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision -making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health -inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and WHEREAS, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana's General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and WHEREAS, as required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all of its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities; and WHEREAS, numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and WHEREAS, the industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 2 of 8     City Council 22 – 582 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, the Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican - American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century and WHEREAS, the construction of Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in a number of families being displaced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, in the 1970s a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as "disadvantaged communities" by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and WHEREAS, the updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations —both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and WHEREAS, there are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City's Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC's existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and WHEREAS, in the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Ordinance No. INS - 3063 Page 3 of 8     City Council 22 – 583 4/1/2025 Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency — Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, in the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency — Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, there is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed -use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very -low income households, which is located less than one -fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, there is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor's yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, The City Council approved a contract with Moore, lacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City's Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 4 of 8     City Council 22 – 584 4/1/2025 WHEREAS, MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning -related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area; and WHEREAS, the policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and WHEREAS, given these concerns, the City Council hereby directs that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district; and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that continuing to issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property located in the TZC for the purposes of industrial business use, prior to the City's completion of its study of the potential impact of such uses, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements in the TZC area is thus necessary; and WHEREAS, if an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: 1) Adversely impacts surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; 2) Adversely impacts sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; 3) Conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; 4) Long-term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses; and 5) Risks to the public health, safety and welfare of the City; and WHEREAS, prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare requires the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance. The absence of this urgency ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which may be adopted by the City; industrial business uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated updates and revisions to the Code. Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and implementation would create Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 5 of 8     City Council 22 – 585 4/1/2025 impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the City Council, in adopting this ordinance, has found to be unacceptable; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds, determines and declares that the current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of the city and its citizens necessitates the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance by a four -fifths vote of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15061(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of uses in the zoning district. Section 3. California Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Section 4. The City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858, hereby adopts this urgency ordinance establishing a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC while City staff researches appropriate regulations and whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. For the purposes of this Ordinance, "industrial uses" includes those specified by Divisions 18 and 19 of Article III of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and by Section 41-2007 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and Table 2A in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84). Section 5. This ordinance shall have no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from the date of its adoption; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days and subsequently, after public hearing, the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance one more year. Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 6 of 8     City Council 22 – 586 4/1/2025 Section 6. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of Chapter 1 of the Code. Section 7. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 8. This ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED this 16t' day of April, 2024, APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: CJ WAQ-y N - Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers Amezcua, Bacerra, Hernande Lopez Penaloza Phan. Vazquez (7) NOES: Councilmembers None (0) ABSTAIN: Councilmembers None (0) NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers None (0) Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 7 of 8     City Council 22 – 587 4/1/2025 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, JENNIFER L. HALL, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-3063 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on April 16, 2024. Date: 4 k acat-\- akCity Ordinance No. NS - 3063 Page 8 of 8     City Council 22 – 588 4/1/2025 28.Urgency Interim Ordinance Pursuant to Section 65858(a) of the California Government Code Adopting a 45-day Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 (A copy of the full text of the proposed urgency ordinance is available for review in the City Clerk’s Office) Department(s): Recommended Action: 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), adopting a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 zoning district. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project.     City Council 22 – 589 4/1/2025 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building Item # 28 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 16, 2024 TOPIC: Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) AGENDA TITLE Urgency Interim Ordinance Pursuant to Section 65858(a) of the California Government Code Adopting a 45-day Moratorium on the Approval, Commencement, Establishment, Relocation, or Expansion of Industrial Uses within Specific Development No. 84 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance by four-fifths (4/5) vote, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), adopting a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 zoning district. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT 2. Find that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff is recommending adoption of an urgency interim ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), also known as a moratorium, to address current and immediate threats to public health, safety, and welfare, due to growing code     City Council 22 – 590 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 2 4 1 8 7 enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts within the Specific Development No. 84 zoning district (commonly referred to as the “Transit Zoning Code” or “TZC”). Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, and surrounding areas, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is straining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods. If adopted, the urgency ordinance would establish a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC while City staff researches appropriate regulations and determines whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. The urgency ordinance shall have no further force and effect 45-days from the date of its adoption, unless, after a report on the first 45 days and a public hearing, the City Council members, again by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial extension period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days. DISCUSSION Background Specific Development No. 84 (the Transit Zoning Code) The Specific Development No. 84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (“TZC”), is located in the central urban core of the City and comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The TZC includes the Civic Center, Downtown, and the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, which are among the City’s most historic in age and in established residential communities. As shown in Exhibit 2, the TZC is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. Prior to the implementation of the TZC, the area consisted of a wide range of civic, commercial, industrial, and residential land uses under a variegated amalgamation of zoning districts and their regulations. In June 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2804, adopting various entitlements approving the creation of the TZC. The TZC established a transit- supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure; preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and     City Council 22 – 591 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 3 4 1 8 7 design standards; encourage alternative modes of transportation; provide for a range of housing options; and allow for the reuse of existing structures. Moreover, the TZC provided new zoning for all of the properties contained within its boundary with the exception of those properties zoned Light Industrial (M1) or Heavy Industrial (M2). These M1 and M2 properties retained their existing zoning, but were covered by two overlay zones that allows for the option of future mixed-use development to be exercised at the discretion of the property owner. In support of the TZC, the City Council also approved a General Plan amendment, establishing numerous mixed-use General Plan land use designations for the entirety of the TZC. In these industrial overlay areas, however, the resulting new General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and land use conflicts between the new General Plan land use designations and the industrial overlays. Since 2010, and specifically in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, these industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, undergone expansions or intensifications, and created numerous land use conflicts and disturbances that affect surrounding residential communities. Specifically, in the Logan neighborhood alone, these land uses create quality of life, health and safety, and other trespass issues for residential properties that often directly abut these industrial land uses. These issues include odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts that have taken place for nearly a decade and a half, despite the change in underlying General Plan land use designation. Comprehensive Zoning Code Update The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required. Necessary amendments include the creation of new zoning district designations and corresponding development standards; updates to the definitions, signage, nonconforming, and parking sections; reorganization of the entire Zoning Code to a more user-friendly format; and new standards to reflect new land use trends, economic development trends, and land use goals of the City. MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area.     City Council 22 – 592 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 4 4 1 8 7 Historically Disadvantaged Communities Prior to the adoption of the City’s Transit Zoning Code (TZC), the City permitted industrial uses within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools. By way of context, the Logan neighborhood represents the oldest Mexican and Mexican-American neighborhoods of Santa Ana and one of the oldest barrios in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20th century. Moreover, as a neighborhood, the area was established before the modern practice of separating impactful land uses, also known as zoning. The Logan neighborhood itself originated as early as 1886 and was largely settled by 1900, before the practice of zoning was enshrined by Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926. By then, the neighborhood comprised residential, industrial, commercial, and related land uses, with issues further exacerbated by rail lines, fuel storage depots, and the construction of the Santa Ana Freeway between 1947 and 1956. Comprehensive data analysis and mapping tools generated by the California EPA (CalEPA), the Center for Diseases Control/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), the U.S. EPA (EPA), and California Healthy Places Index (HPI), present concerning information regarding environmental conditions impacting residents in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Exhibit 3 of this report references EJ maps showing rankings of at least 90% or higher in heavy air pollution attributed to indicators describing exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Diesel Particulate Matter, Air Toxics Cancer Risk, Toxic Releases to Air, and Hazardous Water Proximity exposures. Multiple sources of environmental exposure and pollution burden into communities of color, including the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, presents an alarming set of challenges and decline in healthy community conditions that will impact their quality of life and life expectancy with continued heavy industrial uses nearby. Implementation of Senate Bill (SB 1000), City General Plan Update (GPU), and new Environmental Justice (EJ) Policies and Actions SB 1000 went into effect in 2016, requiring local governments to address pollution and other hazards that disproportionately impact low-income and communities of color within their jurisdiction as a way to proactively plan for and address environmental concerns when developing and updating components of the General Plan. During this period, the City began and extended its comprehensive public engagement process for the General Plan Update through its adoption in April 2022. The City and community worked to ensure that the new General Plan included SB 1000 requirements of addressing environmental justice in local general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing     City Council 22 – 593 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 5 4 1 8 7 harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options. Of note, the new General Plan mixed-use land use designations in the TZC area were largely left intact, including those in the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods, when the General Plan Update was adopted in 2022. Santa Ana’s current General Plan champions implementation policies, including 77 EJ actions that address air quality, noxious uses, water safety, residential lead exposure in the soil, and other environmental public health conditions. City staff, over the past year, have worked on a process to create an EJ Action Committee of EJ cluster area residents, community-based organizations (CBOs), and County and City staff representatives, to guide implementation and resource investments to protect neighborhoods from experiencing any further environmental harm. For the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, incompatible land uses allowed from past zoning decisions, including the industrial overlay zones, have perpetuated the practices of locating industrial uses or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color. Code Enforcement and Immediate Ongoing Issues In the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods within the TZC, the Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. These violations include issues of odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented impacts. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period is creating a public nuisance that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the two residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby. Since June 2023, the TZC communities have experienced a marked increase in impacts stemming from the irreconcilable industrial and residential land use conflicts in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Residents in the TZC have increased their reporting of complaints and public health concerns to City staff regarding emitted contaminants and zoning violations from industrial businesses in the neighborhoods. Concerns that range from air pollution and smoke, toxic release exposures, idling trucks on residential streets, lead exposure, illegal storage, unpermitted uses, loud noise at night, and other property maintenance pose an immediate public health threat that is straining public resources to continuously investigate and address these matters. Six months ago, a fire incident at Macera Crematory, located at 1020 Fuller Street, alarmed neighbors at 9:18 p.m. on August 29, 2023. Neighbors shared with City officials disturbing video of high flames escaping the stack on the rooftop, the screeching noise that went nonstop for 10 minutes, and what they described as a foul odor attributed to the fire. As City staff     City Council 22 – 594 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 6 4 1 8 7 followed up with external regulatory agencies issuing permits to operate this facility, and quickly, staff observed the limitations from regulatory agencies and their compartmentalized processes to investigate and act on enforcement measures. Since 2022, the City has enhanced community services by restructuring its Planning Division to contain a Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services (NIES) section, which oversees, among other functions, environmental justice efforts in Santa Ana and regional coordination to address such issues. Despite this restructuring, it is now well documented that the NIES section’s coordination with external regulatory agencies has not resulted in a favorable outcome in enforcement by responsible external agencies such as South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Department of Consumer Affairs Cemetery and Funeral Bureau (CFB), and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) in many of these investigations. In response, the City has adopted new regulations such as a Noxious Uses Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS-3044, adopted June 20, 2023), which amends Zoning Ordinance No. 2023-01 that includes: a notification requirement to the City by the property owner to obtain a permit from a regulatory public agency; a requirement of a 1,000 linear foot distance buffer measured from the outermost boundary of the subject property; and a conditional use permit requirement from a regulatory public agency to handle, store, emit, or discharge particulate materials, exhaust emissions, or regulated compounds, or chemicals near a public park, school (K-12), or property zoned for residential purposes. City staff have also researched commercial real estate acquisition data and current for sale properties to identify any trends that could potentially generate an increase in the application of the City’s Noxious Uses Ordinance for proposed or expanded industrial uses. From September 2022 to date, seven properties, primarily industrial businesses, sold and three of those businesses (800-808 E. Washington Avenue, 1045 Fuller Street, and 923 N. Logan Street) are located in the Logan neighborhood. Currently, two large properties are in the market for multifamily and land types located in the TZC. Environmental Justice (EJ)/Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Profile: Logan and Lacy neighborhood impacts A demographic profile of the Lacy and Logan neighborhoods combined represent a population of 5,907, which encompass 1,564 households, a median household income of $56,864, average household size is nearly four persons, median age is 27 years, per- capita income is $23,495, and 74% comprise renter-occupied units based on demographic forecasts for 2023. Nearly 25% of the population is under 14 years of age and 14% are 55 years of age and older. Nearly 3% of the population attended up to 12th grade with no diploma, over 31% are high school graduates, and nearly 97% of the working population over 16 years of age are employed. This data illustrates that the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90% or     City Council 22 – 595 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 7 4 1 8 7 greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model. Failure to address ongoing irreconcilable land use conflicts that are the target of this moratorium will further exacerbate the ongoing demographic and environmental justice challenges that these two neighborhoods within the TZC have grappled with since their founding. General Plan Inconsistency with Present Land Uses Numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The purpose of the interim ordinance is to immediately offer protection of public health, safety, and welfare from these irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC, during the time that City staff analyzes and prepares an evaluation of industrial business uses within the TZC. Such an evaluation will enable staff to generate recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether industrial uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and, if not, proceed with an ordinance and zoning map amendment to the district. During the interim moratorium period, City staff will not issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property for the purposes of industrial business use in the TZC. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT This ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of uses in the zoning district. FISCAL IMPACTS There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.     City Council 22 – 596 4/1/2025 Transit Zoning Code Urgency Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) April 16, 2024 Page 8 4 1 8 7 EXHIBITS 1. Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) 2. Transit Zoning Code (TZC) Map 3. Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps City General Plan Environmental Justice Implementation Actions 4. City General Plan Environmental Justice (EJ) Implementation Actions Submitted By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Planning Manager Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager     City Council 22 – 597 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 1 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ADOPTING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL, COMMENCEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, RELOCATION OR EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 84 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has the police power pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, to make and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urgency ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a f our-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect forty -five (45) days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and WHEREAS, Specific Development No. 84 zoning district, also known as the Transit Zoning Code (TZC), located in the central core of Santa Ana, comprises approximately 450 acres, encompasses the Logan, Lacy, and Downtown neighborhoods, and was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2010 ; and WHEREAS, upon the initial adoption of the TZC in 2010, the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana was updated with new land use designations for the areas covered by the TZC to allow for new, mixed-use residential and commercial communities; and WHEREAS, the goals of the TZC are to provide a transit-supportive, pedestrian- oriented development framework to support the addition of new and enhancement of existing communities through transit infrastructure; to preserve and reinforce the existing character and pedestrian nature of the City by strengthening urban form through improved development and design standards; to encourage alternative modes of transportation; to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to provide for a range of housing options; and to allow for the reuse of existing structures; and WHEREAS, industrial uses were established within the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and schools prior to the adoption of the TZC, as far back as the late 19th century, predating modern zoning practices that take into account irreconcilable land use conflicts among variegated land uses; and     City Council 22 – 598 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 2 of 8 WHEREAS, the TZC provides new mixed-use zoning for properties contained within its boundary while creating industrial overlay zones allowing properties being used as industrial uses at the time of its adoption to continue to be governed by industrial zoning districts until such time that properties were converted to the mixed - use zones allowed by the TZC; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1000 went into effect in 2018, requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities, called “disadvantaged communities”, in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans through facilitating transparency and public engagement in the planning and decision-making processes, reducing harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in disadvantaged communities, and promoting equitable access to health-inducing benefits such as healthy housing options; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive update of its General Plan in April 2022; and WHEREAS, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of California was actively involved in ensuring Santa Ana’s General Plan update complied with all aspects of SB 1000 prior to its adoption; and WHEREAS, as required by SB 1000, update of the General Plan and its associated land use plan identified and addressed long standing environmental justice issues throughout all of its elements, which include 77 implementation actions aimed at reducing harmful pollutants and associated health risks in disadvantaged communities ; and WHEREAS, numerous policies of the General Plan are inconsistent with the present, irreconcilable land use pattern of the TZC. Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), and Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), which are targeted at correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities; and WHEREAS, the industrial overlay zones in the TZC perpetuate past planning practices of locating industrial uses, or other noxious and unwanted uses, in close proximity to communities of color; and WHEREAS, the Logan neighborhood is the oldest Mexican and Mexican - American neighborhood in Santa Ana and one of the oldest in Orange County, and one of the few places where Mexicans and those of Mexican descent were allowed to buy     City Council 22 – 599 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 3 of 8 land due to restrictions and covenants based on race during the first half of the 20 th century and WHEREAS, the construction of Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway through Santa Ana in the 1950s resulted in a number of families being displaced through the demolition of single-family homes in the northeastern portion of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, in the 1970s a proposed expansion of an arterial highway along Civic Center Avenue would have demolished a significant portion, if not all, of the Logan neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods are within the second and third highest scored census tracts in Santa Ana, each with a composite score of 90 percent or greater, ranking in the 90th percentile or greater of census tracts in the State, and identified as “disadvantaged communities” by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in its CalEnviroScreen model; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires local jurisdictions to take deliberate actions to explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities to disadvantaged communities, such as Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, resulting from past patterns of segregation, disinvestment, and planning practices; and WHEREAS, the updated land use plan in the Land Use Element of the General Plan does not designate any properties within the TZC, including the Logan or Lacy neighborhoods, as industrial; rather, are designated as varying intensities of District Center or Urban Neighborhood land use designations —both of which are inconsistent with industrial uses; and WHEREAS, there are pressing and growing code enforcement complaints stemming from the irreconcilable land use conflicts in the TZC. Specifically, in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, the City’s Code Enforcement Division has investigated over 33 commercial and industrial properties in the past nine months and currently has 17 active open cases that have been issued Notice of Violations and administrative citations for the following types of violations: illegal storage, land use, zoning, property and landscape maintenance, unpermitted work, business license, and certificate of occupancy. The close proximity of active open industrial cases during a short period of time is creating a public nuisance that is draining City resources and that is harming public health, safety, and general welfare of the TZC’s existing and new residential neighborhoods from the concentration of open code enforcement cases nearby; and WHEREAS, in the Logan neighborhood, 52 industrial facilities (automotive, warehouse/storage, crematory, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution exposure to     City Council 22 – 600 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 4 of 8 disadvantaged communities, including lead risk in soil and housing, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, linguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, in the Lacy neighborhood, 76 industrial facilities (autom otive, warehouse/storage, towing yards, construction) are presently in close proximity to sensitive uses monitored by external regulatory agencies such as South Coast AQMD, Orange County Health Care Agency – Certified Unified Program Agencies (OC CUPA), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQB), Orange County Fire Authority. Industrial facilities have caused significant pollution onto disadvantaged communities, including lead risk exposure, diesel particulate matter from idling trucks, toxic release from facilities, traffic impacts, noise pollution, vibration impacts, and airborne particulate matter or fine inhalable particles of 2.5 (PM2.5) microns or less in diameter. CalEnviroScreen reports higher environmental effects from active facility cleanup s ites, hazardous waste facilities, and solid waste locations. Cumulative health impacts in the area include asthma, cardiovascular disease, and low birth weight, in this overburdened disadvantaged community factored by socioeconomic indicators of poverty, l inguistic isolation, housing burden, and education; and WHEREAS, there is a recent surge in residential development activity in the TZC that is exacerbating the irreconcilable land use conflicts between residential and industrial land uses. Examples include the Lacy Crossing residential development with over 100 ownership units directly adjacent to existing industrial land uses, for which the City receives regular complaints from residential occupants of disturbances from noise, vibrations, odors, and truck traffic; and the Rafferty mixed-use development with 218 residential units, including 11 onsite units for very-low income households, which is located less than one-fifth of a mile from industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, there is a marked increase in the pending and active development applications for industrial land uses in the TZC, including for contractor’s yards, construction debris storage yards, manufacturing operations, expansion of existing industrial businesses, and storage and warehousing operations, stemming from shifting economic demands for goods and services emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, The City Council approved a contract with Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) on October 17, 2023. To ensure the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan are consistent, and to maintain compliance with state law, comprehensive amendments to the Zoning Code are required; and WHEREAS, MIG and City staff have conducted extensive community outreach, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of existing zoning-related codes and policies in     City Council 22 – 601 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 5 of 8 Santa Ana. These early efforts have indicated that the irreconcilable land use conflicts and land use inconsistencies in the TZC area are among the top, most pressing topics that must be addressed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code Update process in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the most vulnerable communities that face the impacts of the land use conflicts within the TZC area; and WHEREAS, the policies and implementation actions in the General Plan also require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these industrial business uses in the TZC; and WHEREAS, given these concerns, the City Council hereby directs that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the TZC to address industrial business uses and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the zoning district, and if not, proceed with an ordinance amendment to preclude such uses from the district; and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that continuing to issue permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property located in the TZC for the purposes of industrial business use, prior to the City’s completion of its study of the potential impact of such uses, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements in the TZC area is thus necessary; and WHEREAS, if an industrial business use is permitted in the TZC without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: (1)Adversely impacts surrounding businesses and neighborhoods; (2)Adversely impacts sensitive uses such as residences, schools, parks, and places where children congregate; (3)Conflicts with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan; (4)Long-term incompatibility and inconsistency with surrounding uses; and (5)Risks to the public health, safety and welfare of the City; and WHEREAS, prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare requires the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance. The absence of this urgency ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which may be adopted by the City; industrial business uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated u pdates and revisions to the Code. Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and implementation would create impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the City Council, in adopting this ordinance, has found to be unacceptable; and     City Council 22 – 602 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 6 of 8 WHEREAS, the City Council finds, determines and declares that the current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of the city and its citizens necessitates the immediate enactment of this urgency ordinance by a four-fifths vote of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does ordain as follows: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15061(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as the ordinance will temporarily preclude the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation or expansion of uses in the zoning district. Section 3. California Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Section 4. The City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858, hereby adopts this urgency ordinance establishing a 45-day moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, modification, relocation or expansion of industrial uses in the TZC while City staff researches appropriate regulations and whether an extension pursuant to the Government Code is necessary. For the purposes of this Ordinance, “industrial uses” includes those specified by Divisions 18 and 19 of Article III of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and by Section 41-2007 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and Table 2A in the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84). Section 5. This ordinance shall have no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from the date of its adoption; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days and subsequently, after public hearing, the City Council members, by four/fifths (4/5) vote, extend this ordinance one more year. Section 6. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of Chapter 1 of the Code.     City Council 22 – 603 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS - ____ Page 7 of 8 Section 7. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 8. This ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED this ___ day of ___________________, 2024. _______________________ Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By:_____________________________ Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: ________________________________________     City Council 22 – 604 4/1/2025 Ordinance No. NS -XXXX Page 8 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _______________________, 2024. Date: ________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk City of Santa Ana     City Council 22 – 605 4/1/2025 HHHWASHINGTON AV WASHINGTON AV WASHINGTON AV FLOWER STFLOWER STCIVIC CENTER DR CIVIC CENTER DR CIVIC CENTER DR CIVIC CENTER DR1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 1ST ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 4TH STGARNSEY STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STBROADWAYBROADWAYBROADWAYBROADWAYPARTON STPARTON STSANTA ANA BLVD SANTA ANA BLVD SANTA ANA BLVDSANTAANAB LV D ROSS STROSS STROSS STROSS STHALLADAY STHICKORY ST FRUIT ST GRAND AVGRAND AVGRAND AVSTANDARD AVORANGE AVCYPRESS AV 6TH STDURANT STSYCAMORE STGRAND AV6TH ST BIRCH STSYCAMORE STSYCAMORE STSYCAMORE STFRENCH STFRENCH STBUSH STBUSH STBUSHSTBUSH STSPURGEONSTFRENCH STMORTIMERSTFLOWERSTFLOWER STLINCOLN AV6TH ST 10TH ST WELLINGTON AV HATHAWAY ST STAFFORD ST BIRCH ST14TH ST VAN NESS AVP ENN W Y 3RD ST 3RD ST 3RD ST 3RD ST 3RD ST 3RD STSPURGEON STSPURGEON ST10TH ST PORTER STHALESWORTH ST LACY ST5TH ST 5TH ST 5TH ST SANTA ANA B L V D LIME ST WASHINGTON AV 14TH ST 6TH ST SANTA FE STVANCE STBROWN ST L A C Y S T HATHAWAY STG A R F I E L D S T GARFIELD STMIN T E R S T MARTHALN STAFFORD ST 11TH ST 12TH ST LOGAN ST10TH ST GARFIELD STLACY ST14TH ST 8TH ST 9TH ST MINTER STPOINSETTIA ST10TH ST 2ND ST FRUIT STEASTWOOD AVBREEDEN STPARTON ST14THST 2ND ST 3RD ST PO IN S E T T I A S T PO I N S E T T I A S T SANTA FE STRIVERINE AVFULLER STL A C Y S T 5TH ST CUSTER ST2ND ST S AN T I A GO S T TERMINAL STSPURGEON STEASTWOOD AVTERMINAL STBIRCH STSANTIAGO ST0 550 1,100 1,650 2,200 2,750275Feet / Transit Zoning Code SD-84 District Boundary Corridor (CDR) Downtown (DT) Government Center (GC) Open Space (OS) Transit Village (TV) Urban Center (UC) Urban Neighborhood (UN-1) Urban Neighborhood (UN-2) Industrial Overlay M-1 (OZ) Industrial Overlay M-2 (OZ) SD-84     City Council 22 – 606 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps     City Council 22 – 607 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The Community Summary infographic data are from ESRI 2023 forecasts, U.S. Census Bureau, and prior year American Community Survey results. Data references population, race and ethnicity, income, age, employment, homeownership, and a population density greater than the City’s population density of 12,471.5 people per square mile.     City Council 22 – 608 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 provides an insight into vulnerable communities that are most affected by pollution burdens, with special consideration on race and ethnicity. The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana at 90% or above as being burdened by pollution.     City Council 22 – 609 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) within the City of Santa Ana, with both Logan and Lacy neighborhoods falling into that category. The CalEPA has responsibility for identifying those communities and CalEPA’s designation of disadvantaged communities must be based on “geographic, socioeconomic, public health, and environmental hazard” criteria. CalEPA DACs affect an entire or a portion of thirty-three of Santa Ana’s neighborhoods.     City Council 22 – 610 4/1/2025 The Center for Diseases Control (CDC) Environmental Justice Index Map uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau, and other federal agencies to rank the cumulative impacts of environmental injustices on health for every census tract. The map below shows the census tract that includes part of the Lacy neighborhood, which appears to rank HIGH in air pollution due to exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Diesel Particulate Matter from idling trucks, and Air Toxics Cancer Risk indicators.     City Council 22 – 611 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below shows the census tract that includes the Logan neighborhood, which appears to rank HIGH in air pollution related to exposure to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Diesel Particulate Matter from idling trucks, and Air Toxics Cancer Risk indicators.     City Council 22 – 612 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The EPA’s Environmental Justice map and screening tool uses national consistent data combining environmental and demographic indicators in maps and reports. The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Air Toxics Cancer Risk, reflecting at 90% or higher.     City Council 22 – 613 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Diesel Particulate Matter indicating percentiles above 90%.     City Council 22 – 614 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Hazardous Water Proximity, showing a percentile of 95% or above.     City Council 22 – 615 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 reflecting a heavy burden of 95% and above in the percentile score.     City Council 22 – 616 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below highlights the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana’s ranking as it relates to Lead Paint showing that the percentile is within 80% and 90%.     City Council 22 – 617 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The map below indicates the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods within the City of Santa Ana ranking as it relates to Toxic Releases to Air showing a high percentile score of 90%.     City Council 22 – 618 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) The Healthy Places Index (HPI) comprises a data and policy platform to advance equitable community investments, develop critical programs and policies and advance health equity through open and accessible data. The map below captures the City of Santa Ana, which indicates that the majority of the City of Santa Ana’s neighborhoods rank on the LOW scale of the healthy community conditions, as seen in the dark blue and light blue layers.     City Council 22 – 619 4/1/2025 EXHIBIT 3 - Logan and Lacy Community Summary Infographic and Environmental Justice (EJ) Data Maps (Continued) Using the HPI mapping tool, the Lacy neighborhood ranks at a 9.6% of the least healthy community conditions. Using the HPI mapping tool, the Logan neighborhood ranks on the LOW end, showing nearly 11% of the least healthy community conditions.     City Council 22 – 620 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Community 1.1 Yes Engage EJ communities on recreation and cultural programs. Incorporate community stakeholders from environmental justice communities to form an Environmental Justice Action Committee to guide the identification of recreational and cultural programing needs and desires. PRCSA / PBA 2023 Community 1.2 Yes Community conversation. Plan for and conduct a community survey every two years related to community health, pollution concerns, parks, community engagement, and community service needs, with focused outreach to environmental justice priority areas utilizing various platforms, such as social media and school events, to encourage substantial survey participation. CMO Every two years Community 1.3 Yes Collaboration. Develop intentional, strategic partnerships with public, private, and nonprofit entities to improve health outcomes by leveraging capacity, resources, and programs around mutually beneficial initiatives that promote health, equity, and sustainability in neighborhoods within environmental justice area boundaries. Develop a comprehensive partnership policy providing guidelines that can be used throughout the City organization. PBA/PRCSA 2022 -2024 Community 1.4 Yes Community coordination on underutilized spaces. Coordinate with community residents, property owners, and other stakeholders to identify vacant and potentially underutilized properties and strategize how such properties could be repurposed into public parks or commercial recreation facilities. PBA/PRCSA 2022 & ongoing Community 1.5 Yes Alternative facilities. In park deficient and environmental justice areas, identify facilities that are viable alternatives to public parks and municipal facilities for recreational, cultural, and health and wellness programs, including but not limited to school facilities, facilities of faith-based and civic organizations, and privately owned recreation and entertainment facilities. Identify, inventory, and rank other resources for potential park system acquisition, expansion to existing parks, and/or parks development opportunity within the community. PRCSA 2022 Community 1.6 Yes Program accessibility. To ensure residents of environmental justice area boundaries have access to recreational, cultural, and health and wellness programs, establish accessibility corridors that provide attractive, comfortable, and safe pedestrian and bike access to public recreational facilities in the Parks Master Plan (an implementation action of the Open Space Element). Identify public realm improvements needed to create these accessibility corridors. Prioritize investments for accessibility corridors in the city's capital investment program; include investments for accessibility corridors when investments are made in new parks and recreation facilities within environmental justice area boundaries. PRCSA/PWA 2022 Page 1 of 11     City Council 22 – 621 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Community 1.7 Yes Rental property outreach. Augment the Proactive Rental Enforcement Team and Residential Response Team with additional outreach geared toward absentee owners of rental properties. Create and periodically distribute outreach materials in order to educate absentee owners about legal obligations to maintain and upkeep rental properties. Distribute information to tenants about their rights and protection, so they are not penalized for reporting or living in a dwelling unit that does not meet health and safety standards. Translate outreach efforts into Spanish, Vietnamese, and other appropriate languages. Prioritize such outreach for properties within environmental justice area boundaries. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Community 1.8 Yes Neighborhood rehabilitation. Continue to seek state and federal funding for neighborhood rehabilitation projects and collaborate with community-based organizations to identify housing issues and improvements needed, especially for housing within environmental justice area boundaries.CDA Ongoing Community 2.1 Yes Facilities to support lifelong learning. For areas within park deficient and environmental justice areas , conduct, maintain, and publicize an inventory of public, nongovernmental, and private facilities that can be used by organizations to support early childhood education, after school activities, libraries and learning centers, and other meetings and educational opportunities. CMO 2024 Community 2.2 Yes Public realm. Identify areas in need of a public realm plan to provide attractive, comfortable, and safe walking corridors to promote accessibility to community programs or activity centers, in conjunction with the City's Active Transportation Plan. PWA/PBA Ongoing Community 3.1 Yes Community health care facilities. Evaluate options to support existing and potential community health care facilities in environmental justice focus areas through a variety of mechanisms such as reduced permit fees, reduced impact fees, and tax incentives. PBA/CMO 2023 Community 3.2 Yes Pedestrian access to health facilities. Ensure that new or redeveloped health care facilities include pedestrian-friendly site amenities. In areas where mobile clinics are stationed, ensure the location is safe and accessible for pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users. PBA Ongoing Community 3.3 Yes Health metrics. Engage with the Orange County Health Care Agency and other stakeholders to monitor key health indicators to measure the success of the outcome of General Plan policies and the implementation plan, including reduction in incidence in asthma and low birth weight of infants. PBA/CMO 2022 Page 2 of 11     City Council 22 – 622 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Community 3.4 Yes Prevention activities. Coordinate with the County Health Care Agency to identify the root causes of health disparities and inequities in Santa Ana, with additional detail for residents living within environmental justice area boundaries. Identify potential programmatic changes and resources to better address the root causes. PBA/CMO 2022 - 2024 Community 3.5 Yes Environmental education. Encourage all education institutions in Santa Ana to include curriculum regarding environmental justice and local efforts to promote clean business operations, environmental quality, and the health in our community. PBA/CMO 2022 - 2024 Community 3.6 Yes Fresh and healthy foods. Pursue programs, incentives, and/or grants to encourage urban agriculture and small grocery or convenience stores to sell fresh foods in the city, especially those within environmental justice area boundaries. Examples include grants or loans to purchase updated equipment, publicity, or directories of healthy food outlets, or connecting stores to wholesale sources of healthy, local, or organic food. CDA 2022 Community 3.6A Yes Food Deserts. Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) to gather and map food desert data, and share publicly through the City's Environmental Quality webpage.PBA 2024 Community 3.7 Yes Public health and wellness collaboration summit. Collaborate with health care providers, health and wellness advocates, and other public health stakeholders to identify ways to improve the provision of and access to health and wellness services throughout the city. Include a discussion on areas within environmental justice area boundaries and other areas underserved by parks, programs and services that support health and wellness. PRCSA 2022 & ongoing Community 3.8 Yes Environmental soil and human health screening measures. Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency, and local stakeholders such as Orange County Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health, in efforts to provide increased healthcare services (i.e., blood lead testing, treatment) for residents, especially those that reside in environmental justice communities. Additionally, collaborate to advocate for adjustment of the County and State policies for health and environmental screening levels to promote healthy outcomes related to lead contamination as recommended by health experts. PBA Ongoing Community 3.9 Yes Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full-time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to implement the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. CMO 2022 Page 3 of 11     City Council 22 – 623 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Conservation 1.1 Yes Air quality planning. Review existing and monitor the development of new air monitoring and emissions reduction plans prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Gather and evaluate measures and strategies in such plans for their applicability to and feasibility for Santa Ana.PBA 2022 & annually Conservation 1.2 Yes Community identification. Coordinate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and local stakeholders to pursue a priority community designation for eligible environmental justice areas of the city , with focus on areas with unique needs and highest pollution burden as identified in the CalEnviroScreen tool. If such designation is not awarded, seek grant funds for activities such as local air quality monitoring. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.3 Yes Proactive engagement. Collaborate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and local stakeholders in environmental justice areas experiencing local air pollutions issues to outline objectives and strategies for monitoring air pollution in advance of the establishment of a community emissions reduction and/or air monitoring plan. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.4 Yes Health risk criteria. Establish criteria for requiring health risk assessments for existing and new industries, including the type of business, thresholds, and scope of assessment. Review existing and establish new regulation to reduce and avoid increased pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. PBA 2022 - 2027 Conservation 1.5 Yes Agency permits. Monitor the South Coast Air Quality Management District permitting and inspection process and the Orange County Health Care Agency to identify businesses in Santa Ana with potential hazardous materials or by-products, with a special focus on environmental justice communities. Serve as a liaison for residents to identify potential emission violations. Share information and data with the community on the City’s Environmental Quality web page. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.6 Yes Emissions monitoring. Coordinate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to monitor existing air measurements and recommend new air measurements and locations.PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.7 Yes Truck idling. Evaluate strategies to reduce truck idling found or reported in areas with sensitive receptors, with a priority placed on environmental justice areas PBA/PD 2022 - 2024 Conservation 1.8 Yes Improve older trucks. Promote the City’s Vehicle Replacement Plan and explore the replacement of older trucks through City participation in regional incentive programs and education of Santa Ana private fleet owners of program opportunities. PWA 2022 Page 4 of 11     City Council 22 – 624 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Conservation 1.9 Yes Indirect source rules. Support the development of indirect source rules, drayage truck rules, advanced clean truck routes, and heavy-duty low NOx rules by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. CMO Ongoing Conservation 1.10 Yes Interagency team. Establish an environmental quality interagency team to evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas. Publish results and information on the City’s website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality web page. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Conservation 1.11 Yes Public education. Augment existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local agencies’ roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other environmental hazards in the community. PBA/PWA Ongoing Conservation 1.12 Yes Data collection for emissions plans. Coordinate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to explore ways to initiate data collection efforts for a community emissions reduction and/or community air monitoring plan, including the identification of information needed (new or updated), potential data sources and needed resources, and strategies to engage residents and collect information. PBA 2022 Conservation 1.13 Yes Community survey on healthy lifestyles. Plan for and conduct a community survey of residents every two years related to community health, pollution, parks, community engagement, and community services, with focused outreach for environment justice concerns and priority areas (tie into other City efforts like Strategic Plan, park and recreation planning, community benefits, etc.).Report findings of survey through the various media platforms and utilize input to inform periodic evaluation and update of General Plan. CMO Every two years Conservation 1.14 Yes Expanded interactions. Identify opportunities to expand regular attendance and support neighborhood associations and community groups to hold regular meetings with City staff and decision-makers in neighborhoods within environmental justice communities, so that residents, community organizations and businesses can communicate their unique issues and needs, as well as their recommendations on how best to implement environmental quality, environmental health, and environmental justice policies. Arrange for language interpretation services as needed at these meetings so that all residents can participate. PBA/CMO Ongoing Conservation 1.15 Yes Expanded representation. Expand representation of residents from neighborhoods within environmental justice area boundaries by extending residents from such areas to become board, commission, and task force members as openings occur PBA/CMO Ongoing Page 5 of 11     City Council 22 – 625 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Conservation 1.16 Yes City budget. Evaluate the City’s budget and financial policies to include direction for prioritizing public services and improvements within environmental justice area boundaries. Augment budget meeting presentations to include a section dedicated to the status of actions and improvements to address the needs of residents within environmental justice area boundaries. CMO Annually Economic Prosperity 3.5 Yes Green business incentives. Continue to promote and market the Recycling Market Development Zone. Develop an incentive program to encourage nonpolluting industry and clean green technology companies that reduce environmental impacts and the carbon footprint to locate to the city. Encourage existing businesses to invest in technology and best practice to transition to sustainable business practices. CDA Ongoing Historical Preservation 3.8 Yes Equitable access. Establish a fee reduction or waiver program for low-income applicants to ensure equitable access and participation in the Mills Act Program.PBA 2023 Land Use 2.10 Yes Open space requirements. Evaluate public open space and park requirements in the zoning code for residential and nonresidential uses. Consider requirements and/or incentives to aggregate public open space areas required by two or more uses to form larger and more usable areas and facilities. PBA/PRCSA 2022 - 2027 Land Use 3.2 Yes Design guidelines and standards. Update the zoning code's development and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences, schools, day care, and public facilities. PBA 2022 - 2027 Land Use 3.3 Yes Healthy lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent to sensitive uses.PBA 2022 Land Use 3.4 Yes Funding for air filtration. Seek funding from South Coast Air Quality Management District and other regional sources for the installation of high-efficiency air filtration systems in buildings, homes, and schools located in areas with high levels of localized air pollution, especially for those within environmental justice area boundaries. PBA 2022 Land Use 3.5 Yes Business incentive. Explore economic development incentives and grant funding to encourage existing or draw new business investments in the industrial zones to incorporate more environmentally sustainable practices. CDA Ongoing Land Use 3.6 Yes Lead paint abatement. Coordinate with County of Orange Health Care Agency and community organizations to strengthen local programs and initiatives to eliminate lead-based paint hazards, with priority given to residential buildings located within environmental justice area boundaries. CDA / PBA 2021 & Ongoing Page 6 of 11     City Council 22 – 626 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Land Use 3.14 Yes Sunshine ordinance. Update City Sunshine Ordinance, incorporating best practices for outreach in environmental justice areas in Santa Ana CMO 2022 Land Use 3.15 Yes Communication tools. Explore tools for communication with residents and sensitive receptors when new industrial uses are proposed in their areas PBA 2022 - 2024 Land Use 3.16 Yes Health in corridors. Require a Health Risk Assessment to identify best practices to minimize air quality and noise impacts when considering new residential uses within 500 feet of a freeway.PBA 2022 - 2027 Land Use 3.17 Yes Training for safe practice. Pursue the EPA Renovate Right Program to train local residential contractors for certification as lead renovators to promote safe work practices and prevent lead contamination. PBA 2022 Land Use 3.18 Yes Renovations and lead prevention. Evaluate the feasibility of requiring contractor training and/or certification for safe work practices to conduct residential renovations for pre-1978 structures that may contain existing lead paint. PBA & CDA Ongoing Land Use 3.19 Yes Promote health. Partner with local organizations (e.g., OC Health Care Agency, Latino Health Access, Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified School District, Orange County Environmental Justice, and the Coalition of Community Health Centers) to increase blood lead testing, outreach, education, and referral services through a ‘promotora’ or community peer outreach model that addresses the root causes of elevated blood lead levels impacting Santa Ana residents, with special focus in environmental justice communities and for children living in pre-1978 housing. PBA 2022 - Ongoing Land Use 3.20 Yes Safe housing. Require all residential rehabilitation projects that use local, or HUD federal funds to comply with the Lead Safe Housing Rule, to remove lead paint hazards, depending on the nature of work and the dollar amount of federal investment in the property CDA Ongoing Land Use 3.21 Yes Prevention education. Collaborate with local organizations such as Orange County Health Care Agency, State Environmental Protection Agency, and community-based environmental justice organizations to identify funds and create a Santa Ana Prevent Lead Poisoning Education Program, with special focus on disadvantaged communities and pre-1978 housing stock. PBA 2022 - Ongoing Page 7 of 11     City Council 22 – 627 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Land Use 3.22 Yes Public health outcomes. Support the Orange County Health Care Agency in their role in investigating public complaints regarding unsafe lead work practices and lead hazards wherein children are present, through enforcement of local housing standards to assure healthy outcomes, including for individuals and households presenting with concerns about lead exposure and/or with confirmed lead levels of >3.5ug/dL, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates as the threshold for follow- up and case management in children. PBA 2022 & Ongoingng Land Use 3.23 Yes Agency permits. Work with South Coast Air Quality Management District and Orange County Health Care Agency to evaluate existing special permit process and criteria for approval, and identify potential policy changes to minimize issuance of special permits with potential health impacts. PBA 2022 Land Use 3.24 Yes Public health. Partner with Orange County Health Care Agency and community serving organizations to evaluate best practices and benefits of preparing a Public Health Plan to address environmental hazards in Santa Ana, with special focus in environmental justice communities. Conduct public meetings to gather information and present preliminary findings. PBA 2022 - 2024 Land Use 3.25 Yes Engage EJ communities. Work with community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and residents to form an Ad Hoc Committee to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new disadvantaged EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of environmental justice policies. PBA 2022 Land Use 3.26 Yes Health conditions. Work with state agencies including the Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District, Orange County Health Care Agency and local stakeholders including Orange County Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health to identify PBA Ongoing Land Use 3.27 Yes Groundwater practice. Coordinate with the State Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to monitor the Santa Ana Southeast Groundwater Clean Up Project and identify measurable progress to remediate groundwater contamination. Share information with the community on the City’s Environmental Quality web page. PBA Ongoing Page 8 of 11     City Council 22 – 628 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Land Use 3.28 Yes Tenant protections. Provide information to residential tenants regarding Landlord Tenant Laws in the State, such as AB 1481, and Santa Ana’s Just Cause for Tenant Eviction and Rent Stabilization ordinance that provide protections against evictions for those who seek action to improve substandard housing and hazardous conditions. PBA 2022 & Ongoing Land Use 3.29 Yes Development site history. Update the City’s Development Review application process to require developers to provide information regarding the prior use of the site and history of hazardous materials on the property, in order to identify potential for site contamination from hazardous materials or soil lead contamination to be remediated. PBA 2022 Land Use 4.6 Yes Fireworks and environmental pollution. Study the data available to understand the health effects and environmental exposure, including air quality and noise impacts, from airborne sources such as fireworks shows and displays, with special focus on environmental justice areas. PBA/CMO/PD 2022 - 2024 Land Use 4.7 Yes Construction improvements. Identify best practices and communication tools to monitor mitigation measures and oversight of private and public construction improvements to protect the health and safety of health of the community, with focus on environmental justice areas. PWA/PBA Ongoing Mobility 3.5 Yes Safe routes to schools and parks. Develop and pursue implementation of a Safe Routes to School Plan and a Safe Routes to Parks Plan PWA/PRCSA Ongoing Mobility 4.5 Yes Citywide Design Guidelines update. Update the Citywide Design Guidelines to strengthen pedestrian and cyclist linkages to development centers and residential neighborhoods and coordinate on-site landscape with public realm landscaping.PBA/PWA 2022 - 2027 Mobility 5.8 Yes Air quality improvements. Participate in inter-jurisdictional efforts to promote improvements in air quality and to meet state and federal mandates through advanced technology and TDM programs PBA/PWA 2021-2035 Open Space 1.2 Yes Interagency Forum. Convene an interagency forum to take a coordinated approach to evaluating the feasibility for converting City-owned properties to parkland, with special focus in park deficient and environmental justice areas. PRCSA 2022 Open Space 1.7 Yes Public parkland requirements for residential projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for large residential projects, which include projects of 100 residential units or more, to require public parkland within the City limits and a 10-minute walking distance of the new residential projects. PBA/PRCSA 2022 Page 9 of 11     City Council 22 – 629 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Open Space 1.7A Yes Open space and park land incentives. Allow developers a reduction in on-site open space by giving credits for park land for public use. Establish a process and program to incentivize developers to provide additional on-site and/or publicly accessible open space to create public park land and open space. Research and collaborate with residents, developers, and community organizations to design and implement an open space density bonus to incentivize the creation of additional on-site open space in exchange for more density in the project. PBA & PRCSA 2022-2027 Open Space 1.10 Yes New parkland collaborative. Coordinate with property owners to explore options to provide public access and programming on privately-owned open space in park deficient areas, including options to acquire land through purchase, land dedication, easements, and land leases that would allow for permanent or temporary public use of land for open space and recreational opportunities. PRCSA 2022 & Ongoing Open Space 1.11 Yes Joint-use agreements. Coordinate with public school districts, private schools, and other community organizations to provide community members with access to additional open space and recreational resources. PRCSA 2022 & Ongoing Open Space 1.13 Yes New programming in underserved areas. Partner with community organizations to offer new programs that are accessible to residents who live in areas underserved by open space and recreational facilities. Develop a comprehensive partnership policy providing guidelines that can be used throughout the City organization. PRCSA 2022 Open Space 1.14 Yes Community partnerships. Continue building partnerships with community-based organizations that administer social services to the elderly, youth, and other special needs groups; create use agreements for these providers to use public park facilities to meet the recreational and educational needs of these groups. PRCSA Ongoing Open Space 1.15 Yes Community input. Identify and utilize multilingual and interactive community engagement tools, initiated through the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, for residents and facility users to provide ongoing input about open space needs, park design, facility improvements, and programming PRCSA 2022 Open Space 1.16 Yes Acquisitions to meet park standard. Using the Park Master Plan as guidance, identify and acquire property within the City for park and open space use which will focus on bringing the park and recreation system to three acres of land per 1,000 residents with a plan to keep pace with future urban growth. PRCSA 2022 & ongoing Public Services 1.4 Yes Fiscal priority for public improvements. Identify City fiscal and operational procedures and potential thresholds involved in the prioritization of general funds for public programming, service, or infrastructure improvements for residents living within environmental justice area boundaries. CMO 2021 & annually Page 10 of 11     City Council 22 – 630 4/1/2025 City of Santa Ana General Plan EJ Actions GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REF # EJ policy IMPLEMENTATION ACTION RESPONSIBLE DEPT/ AGENCY TIME FRAME Safety 2.4 Yes Lead contamination. Work with local and regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with environmental justice stakeholders in proposing solutions to remove hazardous lead- contaminated soils in the city and with benchmarks to measure and track effectiveness of proposed programs. PBA/CDA Ongoing Safety 2.5 Yes Business education. Collaborate with state and county agencies and trade organizations to educate and inform industrial business owners about permit regulations required for safe facility operations and about best practices. PBA/CDA Ongoing Page 11 of 11     City Council 22 – 631 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CA. The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision-making process. The following notice is being provided so that you can ask questions, make comments and stay informed about projects that might be important to you. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN - The City Council of the City of Santa Ana will hold a public hearing to receive public testimony and will take action on the item described below. Proposed Action: The City of Santa Ana is proposing to adopt an ordinance extending Ordinance No. NS-3063 for 10 months and 15 days pursuant to Section 65858(a) of the California Government Code continuing a moratorium on the approval, commencement, establishment, relocation, or expansion of industrial uses within Specific Development No. 84 zoning district. Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)3. The activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Furthermore, the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3 because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Meeting Details: This public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in-person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www.santa- ana.org/agendas-and-minutes/. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to eComment@santa-ana.org (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or mail to Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the City Council but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: All staff reports regarding any item on this agenda are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during regular business hours and posted on the City’s website the Tuesday before a Council meeting at: https://www.santa-ana.org/agendas-and-minutes/. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Margarita Macedonio with the Planning and Building Agency by phone at (714) 667-2288 or by email at MMacedonio@santa-ana.org.     City Council 22 – 632 4/1/2025 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de llamar a Margarita Macedonio (714) 667-2288. Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Tony Lai số (714) 565-2627.     City Council 22 – 633 4/1/2025 CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CA The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision-making process. The following notice is being provided so that you can ask questions, make comments, and stay informed about projects that might be important to you. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN - The City Council of the City of Santa Ana will hold a public hearing to receive public testimony and will take action on the item described below. Project Location:The area within the Transit Zoning Code/Specific Development (SD) No. 84 Zoning District, as depicted in the attached map. Project Applicant: City of Santa Ana Proposed Project: City Council consideration of Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development (SD) No. 84) zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and to amend the City’s Zoning Map. The proposed amendments include removal of industrial uses from the permitted uses table, updates to the nonconforming regulations, a new amortization process, and new operational standards applicable to businesses within the zoning district. The proposal also includes removing the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) suffixes from certain properties within the SD-84 zoning district, as shown on the City’s Zoning Map. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, an addendum has been prepared to the City of Santa Ana’s Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to demonstrate that, pursuant to the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, this project is within the scope of the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) EIR No. 2006-02, State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2006071100, certified by the City of Santa Ana on June 7, 2010. The Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) EIR fully analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed code amendments. This is consistent with Section 8.06 of the City’s Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. Action Taken by the Planning Commission on March 6, 2025: Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the following: a Resolution to make findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and adopt the Addendum to the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number No. 2006071100), a Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2024-02 to make changes to the text of the Transit Zoning Code and Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-03 to amend the SD-84 zoning district of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code to amend the City’s Zoning Map to remove the Light Industrial (M1) and Heavy Industrial (M2) suffixes from certain properties in the SD-84 zoning district. VOTE: 4-2-1 (Ayes: Commissioners Oliva, Pham, Escamilla, Woo; Noes: Commissioners Benninger, Leo; Absent: Commissioner Ramos).    City Council 22 – 634 4/1/2025 Meeting Details: This public hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 5:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in-person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www.santa- ana.org/agendas-and-minutes/. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to eComment@santa-ana.org (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or mail to Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the City Council but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: All staff reports regarding any item on this agenda are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during regular business hours and posted on the City’s website the Tuesday before a Council meeting at: https://www.santa-ana.org/agendas-and-minutes/. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Margarita Macedonio with the Planning and Building Agency at MMacedonio@santa-ana.org or (714) 667-2288. Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de llamar a Nuvia Ocampo (714) 667-2732. Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Kristie Ha (714) 565-2627. City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code Area     City Council 22 – 635 4/1/2025 Jennifer L. Hall, CMC City Clerk Publish Orange County Reporter - Legals Section Date: March 19, 2025     City Council 22 – 636 4/1/2025