Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 23 - Agreement with Dokken Engineering for Caltrans Bridge Inspection Report Recommendations
Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.gov/pw Item # 23 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report August 4, 2026 TOPIC: Award of an Agreement for Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program AGENDA TITLE Award of an Agreement with Dokken Engineering for Design Services to Address Caltrans Bridge Inspection Report Recommendations (Project No. 25-6986) (Non- General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $282,400 in grant funding into the Select Street Construction, Federal Grant-Indirect revenue account (No. 05917002-52001) and appropriate it to the Select Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Buildings expenditure account (No. 05917660-66220). (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program to include an additional $282,400 in Design funds for the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Project (No. 25-6986). 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Dokken Engineering to provide Professional Design Services in an amount not-to-exceed $572,935 for a one-year term beginning August 4, 2026 and expiring August 3, 2027, with provisions for four, one-year extensions (Agreement No. A-2026-XXX). GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes DISCUSSION The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) performs routine Bridge Inspection Reports (BIR) to systematically monitor, document, and manage the structural integrity and safety of all bridges across California. The reports outline specific maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation recommendations. The City's Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for the maintenance and repair of the City's 22 bridges. PWA utilizes the findings in the BIR to plan maintenance and capital improvements to maintain the City's bridges in service. Additionally, municipalities rely on BIR data to seek State and Federal funding for bridge repairs and upgrades. In 2020, the City submitted a Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) plan to Caltrans that identified eight bridges (Exhibit 1) in need of maintenance and repair and City Council 23 — 1 8/4/2026 Agreement for Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program August 4, 2026 Page 2 requested funding through the Highway Bridge Program. The Highway Bridge Program is managed by Caltrans and is a structural safety program that provides federal-aid to local public agencies to replace, rehabilitate, or perform preventive maintenance work on locally-owned, public highway bridges. Highway Bridge Program funding is administered on a reimbursement basis through Caltrans. Eligible project costs are initially paid using local funds and subsequently reimbursed by Caltrans. In May 2025, Caltrans approved $245,600 in federal funding for the proposed BPMP project design phase. PWA requires the assistance of structural engineers and bridge design experts to deliver the proposed BPMP project. Therefore, on June 5, 2025, PWA issued a request for proposals from qualified professional engineering consultants to prepare the design phase services and construction support for the BPMP maintenance and repair work for eight bridges (Exhibit 2). The RFP scope includes preparing required environmental documentation, preparing plans, contract specifications and cost estimates and securing regulatory permits for the repair work to be performed on bridge decks and substructures. Request for Proposals No. 25-081A was advertised on June 5, 2025 on the City's online bid management and publication system, PlanetBids. A summary of vendor participation and results is as follows: 2,336 Vendors notified 7 Santa Ana vendors notified 52 Vendors downloaded the bid packet 4 Proposals received 0 Proposals received from Santa Ana vendors Proposals were solicited, opened on July 8, 2025, and evaluated. Four proposals were submitted by the RFP deadline and all were determined to be responsive to the specifications and met the City's requirements. Proposals were subsequently evaluated by a selection committee. Based on criteria outlined in the RFP, the following summarizes the top responding firms: Firm City Rankin Dokken Engineering San Diego 1 Mark Thomas Irvine 2 Kleinfelder Ontario 3 KPFF I Irvine 14 The design fees quoted in the proposals were much higher than the initial Caltrans funding allotted and the City requested additional funding from Caltrans for the BPMP project. Staff had to defer award of the agreement pending approval of additional Caltrans funding. The firms agreed to extend the validity of their proposal and remained responsive to the City's requirements. City Council 23 — 2 8/4/2026 Agreement for Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program August 4, 2026 Page 3 In June 2026, Caltrans approved additional funding for a total amount not to exceed $528,000 of federal funds. The City is required to provide an additional 20% local match for every federal dollar spent up to $132,000, for a maximum total design phase budget of$660,000. However, based on the recommended consultant and their proposed fee, the total design phase cost is $572,935 of which $458,348 will be reimbursed to the City by Caltrans. Caltrans is currently preparing an updated Program Supplement Agreement and authorization letters to reflect the increased approved design phase funding (Exhibit 3). Staff recommends awarding an agreement to the highest-ranked firm, Dokken Engineering (Exhibit 4 & 5). Dokken Engineering has had previous contracts with the City for roadway design services. Their proposal received the highest score due to their team's experience in bridge structures and demonstrating their understanding of the scope of work required. Upon completion of the design phase, which is anticipated within approximately 18 to 24 months, the City will seek approval from Caltrans to proceed to the construction phase with additional funding from the Highway Bridge Program which is approximately $4 million. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the recommended action. As part of this proposed agreement, the Consultant will be preparing an environmental report for future consideration by City Council. FISCAL IMPACT The funds were budgeted and available in the following accounts for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 and will be carried forward for use in Fiscal Year 2026-2027, subject to City Council approval of the carryover. With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustment, all funds will be available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2026-2027. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be presented to City Council for approval of carryovers into Fiscal Year 2027-2028. With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustment, $282,400 in grant funds will be recognized in the Select Street Construction, Federal Grant-Indirect revenue account (No. 05917002-52001) and appropriated for spending in the Select Street Construction, Select Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Buildings Account (No. 05917660-66220). City Council 23 — 3 8/4/2026 Agreement for Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program August 4, 2026 Page 4 Accounting Accounting Unit, Fiscal Year Unit — Fund Account Amount Account No. Description Project No. Description CURRENT BUDGET Measure M2 Local 03217662- Measure M- Fairshare, 2026-27 66220 Street Improvements $82,587 (25-6986) Construction Other Than Buildings Select Street 05917660- Select Street Construction, 2026-27 66220 Construction Improvements $175,948 (25-6986) Other Than Buildings HUTA 2103 Gas 05917663- Select Street Tax, 2026-27 66220 Improvements $32,000 (25-6986) Construction Other Than Buildings APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Select Street 05917660- Select Street Construction, 2026-27 66220 Improvements $282,400 (25-6986) Construction Other Than Buildings TOTAL $572,935 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Location Map 2. RFP No. 25-081A 3. Amended PSA 4. Dokken Engineering Cost Proposal 5. Agreement with Dokken Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director of Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nunez, City Manager City Council 23 — 4 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 1 22 -s. ............. Cj) 'El ------- 2-1 T9, EVENTEENTII� SEVENTEEN 1z GIVIG CENTER SANTA Em] -FIEMD FIRST L Li Ti JM0��0 wY55 I EDINGER WARNER DYE W.—HUR 'I IILJIr MocARTHUR SUNFLOWER ar SUNFLOWU DIEG ORA BRIDGE LOCATION "A' -4 SANTA ANA PROJECT 25-6986 CITY COUNCIL BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE PWA , AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 4, 2026 MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (BPMP) PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT 2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 25-081A FOR BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM kit NF GOID11 CITY _ND 1 , CITY OF SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Alex A. Bangean Senior Civil Engineer P.E. (714)647-5665 ABangean@santa-ana.org Approved for Release: Lf��7 Nabil Saba, P.E. Executive Director Public Works Agency KEY RFP DATES: The schedule below is tentative and subject to change at the discretion of City, with appropriate notice to prospective Proposers. Issue Date: Thursday, June 5, 2025 Deadline for Requests for Information: Thursday, June 19, 2025, 2:00 P.M. Proposal Due Date: Thursday, June 26, 2025, 2:00 P.M. Anticipated Project Award Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CITY BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................. 3 II. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT.......................................................................................................... 3 III. TERM OF AGREEMENT............................................................................................................. 3 IV. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS...................................................................................................... 4 V. RESPONSE TO RFP .................................................................................................................. 4 VI. CERTIFICATIONS (ATTACHMENTS)......................................................................................... 9 VII. REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 9 Vill. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE....................................................................... 10 IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA ............................................................................... 10 X. WITHDRAWALS........................................................................................................................ 11 XI. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 11 XII. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS........................ 16 XIII FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................... 19 XIV.AWARD OF AGREEMENT........................................................................................................ 20 XV. IMPLEMENTATION................................................................................................................... 20 EXHIBITS Exhibits provided herein for Proposers'reference only. EXHIBIT I — SCOPE OF SERVICES EXHIBIT II —SAMPLE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT III —FEDERAL REGULATIONS EXHIBIT IV—COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) EXHIBIT V— BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS EXHIBIT VI —LOCATION MAP AND BPMP PLAN ATTACHMENTS A PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION, PROPOSAL ITEM PRICING B PROPOSER'S STATEMENT C NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT D NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION E NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION F SUBCONTRACTOR DESIGNATION FORM G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION H STATEMENT REGARDING CWA REQUIREMENTS I SAM.GOV UEI VERIFICATION J CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INEGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION K FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS—CALTRANS FORMS City Council 23 — 7 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA I. CITY BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana, California, is rich in culture and pride, the county seat of Orange County, and encompasses an area of approximately 27 square miles. For more information, please visit https://www.santa-ana.org/ II. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT The City of Santa Ana (City) is seeking proposals from qualified firms and organizations (Proposers) to provide Professional Engineering Design Services for eight (8) bridges for the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Programp (BPMP) Project, Federal Aid Project Number BPMPL 5063(220). See EXHIBIT I for complete Scope of Services. The term "Vendor" "Proposer" "Consultant" "Firm" and "Contractor" shall refer to any legal entity or entities submitting a proposal in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP). Project may be funded with State and Federal grant funds administered by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Special conditions shall apply. Refer to Scope of Work for further information. CARB FLEET REGULATIONS: The California Air Resources Board ("CARB") implemented amendments to the In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulations ("Regulation") which are effective on January 1, 2024 and apply broadly to all self-propelled off road diesel vehicles 25 horsepower or greater and other forms of equipment used in California. A copy of the Regulation is available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2022/off-roaddiesel/appa-1.pdf. Proposers are required to comply with all CARB and Regulation requirements, including, without limitation, all applicable sections of the Regulation, as codified in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations section 2449 et seq. throughout the duration of the Project. Proposers must provide, with their Proposal, copies of Proposer's and all listed subcontractors' most recent, valid Certificate of Reported Compliance ("CRC") issued by CARB. Failure to provide valid CRCs as required herein may render the Proposal non-responsive. State and Federal grant funds administered by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) will be used to fund all or a portion of this project. The successful proposer will be required to comply with all requirements associated with federal funding in carrying out the project. The Federal Funding Requirements and Attachment L of this RFP provides additional information on federal funding requirements. III. TERM OF AGREEMENT The anticipated term of the agreement is for an initial period of three (3) years. The City may, at its discretion, extend the agreement with the same or more limited scope of required services for two (2) additional one (1) year periods, upon mutual agreement contingent upon City Council approval, or City Manager or City Attorney authorization, as appropriate. The total term of the awarded agreement shall not exceed five (5) years. Usage is not guaranteed. Execution of an agreement between the City and successful firm(s) and/or individual(s) does not guarantee work throughout the duration of the contract period. City Council 23 — 8 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 '? CITY OF SANTA ANA Numerous factors will be evaluated by the City in its delivery of project and assignments, including technical expertise required. IV. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS 1) Contractor must have been in business continuously for the most recent five (5) years prior to the date of this RFP. 2) Minimum three (3) most recent years of experience performing similar services as those detailed in the Scope of Services section of this RFP. V. RESPONSE TO RFP A. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS It is the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that any proposals submitted have been uploaded to PlanetBids prior to the RFP due date and time. Proposals, including all required sections and forms, shall be submitted electronically via the City's Bid Management System, PlanetBids. Additionally, it is a requirement that five (5) hard copy proposals be delivered to the Public Works Agency drop box located on the first floor of Ross Annex across from the Development Permit counter in an enclosed sealed envelope and marked clearly with the following: "SEALED PROPOSAL FOR BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM RFP NO. 25-081 A IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DO NOT OPEN WITH REGULAR MAIL." City of Santa Ana Attn.: Alexandru Bangean Public Works Agency; M-36 20 Civic Center Plaza; Ross Annex Santa Ana, CA 92701 Gentle note: staff will not timestamp or sign any hard copy deliveries as the electronic submittal by the deadline is suffice. For further instructions regarding hard copy submission of proposals, refer to PlanetBids. PlanetBids will not accept late proposals and no exceptions shall be made. Proposers will receive an a-bid confirmation number with a time stamp from PlanetBids indicating that their proposal was submitted successfully. The City will only receive and consider those proposals that were transmitted successfully. Submit proposal online at: http://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanVID=20137. Proposer shall be solely responsible for informing itself with respect to the proper utilization of the bid management system, for ensuring the capability of their computer system to upload the required documents, and for the stability of their internet service. Failure of the Proposer to successfully submit an electronic proposal shall be at the Proposer's sole risk and no relief will be given for late and/or improperly submitted proposals. Proposers experiencing any technical difficulties with the bid submission process may contact PlanetBids at (818) 992- City Council 23 — 9 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA 1771. Questions of an operational nature may be directed to the City's assigned Buyer. Neither the City, nor PlanetBids, makes any guarantee as to the timely availability of assistance, or assurance that any given problem will be resolved by the bid submission deadline. Proposals shall NOT be sent via telegraphic, electronic, or facsimile means. All notifications, updates and addenda will be posted online on PlanetBids at htti)s://www.r)lanetbids.com/portal/r)ortal.cfm?CompanvlD=20137. Proposers shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation. Failure to respond to required updates may result in a determination of a nonresponsive proposal. B. COMMUNICATION / CONTACT WITH CITY STAFF Unless otherwise authorized herein, Proposers who are considering submitting a proposal in response to this RFP, or who submit a proposal in response to this RFP, are only to communicate with the assigned Project Coordinator(s), and no other City staff about this RFP from the date this RFP is issued until ais awarded. The City will provide all official communication concerning this RFP in writing via the City's Bid Management System, PlanetBids. The City will not be responsible for or bound by any oral communication or any other information or contact that occurs outside the official communication process specified herein, unless confirmed in writing by the designated Project Manager(s). C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION / QUESTIONS Questions regarding this RFP shall be submitted via PlanetBids. Responses to all questions will be posted on PlanetBids no later than the date and time shown at the schedule of key RFP dates on the cover page of this RFP. All prospective Proposers are advised to visit PlanetBids on a regular basis as responses may be posted earlier than the date above (if applicable). No verbal requests or responses will be accepted. Significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this RFP. Significant interpretations or clarifications and responses to questions received by the deadline will be addressed via addenda to this RFP, which will be released and posted on PlanetBids under the "Addenda/Emails" tab. D. EXCEPTIONS Requests submitted for City's consideration of proposed terms and conditions, including modifications to the City's RFP and/or Agreement terms and conditions must be submitted by the deadline for questions. Such requests should include an attachment in Word or PDF format on formal company letterhead that shows the requested modifications. Should the Proposer be considered for award recommendation and progress into the negotiations phase, the requests for exceptions or modifications to the City's terms and conditions will be discussed at that time. The City will not accept any requests after the deadline for questions and reserves the right to reject or strike any requests for exceptions or additional terms and conditions related to Agreement, RFP, and insurance and indemnification terms and conditions. E. ADDENDA Any changes in RFP from the date of release to date of submittal will result in an addendum or amendment. Notification of such addendum or amendment shall be posted on City's PlanetBids system, https://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanvlD=20137. City Council 23 — 10 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Proposers shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation. F. UNDERSTANDING PROPOSAL It is the responsibility of each Proposer to inquire about any criteria, condition, term, provision, or requirement of the RFP that the Proposer does not understand. Responses to inquiries, if they significantly change or clarify the RFP requirements or any aspect of the procurement process, will be forwarded by addenda to all Proposers. The City will not be bound by any oral responses to inquiries. By submitting proposals, Proposers assert that they have fully read the RFP and any addenda issued by the City, the proposed Agreement and any other Agreement Documents, and affirm that the terms and conditions stated therein are fully understood and are acceptable to the Proposer. Each Proposer accepts the terms and conditions of the Agreement Documents and indicates their ability and willingness to perform the requested services under such terms and conditions. Any exceptions to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement Document shall be submitted to the City by the deadline to submit requests for information or clarification/questions set forth herein. G. PROPOSAL CONTENTS Proposals are to be prepared in such a way as to provide a straightforward, concise delineation of capabilities to satisfy the requirements of this RFP. Colored displays, promotional materials, photographs etc., are not necessary or desired. Emphasis should be concentrated on conformance to RFP instructions, responsiveness to the RFP requirements, and on completeness and clarity of content. Digital dividers and clear organization of content and material are encouraged. 1. Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) SOQ must include a Table of Contents and be limited to a maximum of 20 pages (excluding City's required Certifications listed in Section Vill below; Proposal Cover Letter, section dividers, table of contents, resumes, front/back cover pages). The page limitation includes all appendices, attachments, and supplemental information. Additionally, SOQ must include the following: a. Cover Letter Proposals shall include a letter signed by a principal or authorized representative who can make legally binding commitments for the entity. Include type of business entity. Cover Letter shall not exceed one page. Cover letter must be addressed to the following City Project Manager: Alexandru Bangean, Senior Civil Engineer City of Santa Ana — M-36 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 b. Services Provided Proposal shall include a Scope of Services and Schedule which detail the work phase to be completed, the tasks to be accomplished, the deliverables to be provided, the schedule/timeline to complete the project, and how they meet the needs of the City as City Council 23 — 11 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA described in Exhibit I — Scope of Services. c. Agreement Statement Proposal shall include a statement outlining your concurrence or reference to concerns previously submitted with any and all provisions as contained in EXHIBIT II —Sample Agreement of this RFP (if any). d. Firm and Team Experience Proposal shall include a profile of the firm's experience including the following: i. A general description of the firm, including size and number of employees working directly with the City on this agreement. ii. Firm's nearest address serving the City of Santa Ana and headquarters address. iii. Name and contact information of the supervising Project Manager/Principal Agent, to be assigned to the agreement. The Project Manager/Principal Agent shall be the primary contact person to represent your firm and will be the person to conduct the presentation, if invited to an interview. iv. Resumes for all key staff proposed describing relevant experience. e. Proposed Work Plan Proposal shall include a statement demonstrating the firm's understanding of the Scope of Services. Additionally, proposed work plan shall include Proposers': i. Anticipated approach to performing services as specified herein; ii. Suggestions or special concerns the evaluation committee should take into consideration (if any); iii. Description of deliverables and implementation plan. Proposer shall submit a general description of the deliverables, implementation plan, and timeline. f. References References shall be submitted for similar projects performed for state and/or similar government clients. g. CARB Fleet Compliance The City is a Public Works Awarding Body, as defined under Title 13 California Code of Regulations section 2449(c)(46). Accordingly, Proposers must submit, with their Proposals, valid Certificates of Reported Compliance ("CRC") for the Proposer's fleet and for the fleet(s) of its listed subcontractors (including any applicable leased equipment or vehicles). Proposer must additionally complete and submit the Fleet Compliance Certification, included herein as ATTACHMENT J. Failure to provide a CRC for the Proposer, and for all listed subcontractors, or failure to complete the Fleet Compliance Certification, may render the Proposal non-responsive. 2. Cost Proposal All Proposers are required to submit a fixed rate fee with their Cost Proposal. Pricing instructions should be clearly defined to ensure fees proposed can be compared and City Council 23 — 12 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA evaluated. Cost Proposal must include a payment schedule if applicable. City reserves the right to negotiate compensation and/or payment schedule prior to award of any resulting agreement. If providing hourly rate sheets, Proposer shall not include rate ranges or averages. The fee proposal shall be submitted separately and concurrently with the technical proposal, electronically in PlanetBids, and as a hard copy in a separately sealed enveloped, clearly labeled as "Fee Proposal." This shall include the firm's Standard Hourly Fee Schedule, a table outlining the tasks and team hourly effort for each of the major tasks, and a Project Fee Schedule, as outlined in the Scope of Work. The City shall not provide reimbursement for travel-related expenses, mileage, parking, lodging, meals, incidental fees, insurance,freight/shipping and handling/delivery, and any other business expenses, supplies and materials related to providing services as specified herein. Additional costs will not be considered and will not be reimbursed by the City, therefore, such costs must be absorbed in Proposer's cost proposal fee structure. Any language related to travel reimbursement shall be stricken from the document by the City and if not stricken, shall be deemed invalid. Proposals shall be valid for a minimum of one hundred eighty (180) days following Proposal deadline. The cost for developing the Proposal is the sole responsibility of the Proposer. All Proposals submitted become property of the City. Pricing shall remain firm for the entire initial Agreement term. Thereafter, any proposed pricing adjustment for follow-on renewal periods shall be submitted to the City Representative in writing at least ninety (90) days prior to the new Agreement term. The City reserves the right to accept, reject, or negotiate any proposed pricing adjustment not to exceed the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI) data as follows: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA; All Urban Consumers; Not Seasonally Adjusted; annualized change comparing the most recent month's reported data to the same month of the prior year. (This information may be found on the U.S. Department of Labor's website at www.bls.gov.) H. PROTEST PROCEDURES Only respondents who have actually submitted a proposal may file a "protest" to an RFP with the City's Purchasing Department. In order for a Proposer's protest to be considered valid, the protest must: 1. Be filed in writing before 5:00 p.m. of the 5th business day following the posting of RFP Results/Notice of Intent to Award on the City's online bidding system; 2. Clearly identify the specific irregularity or accusation; 3. Clearly identify the specific City staff determination or recommendation being protested; 4. Specify, in detail, the grounds of the protest and the facts supporting the protest; and 5. Include all relevant, supporting documentation with the protest at time of filing. City Council 23 — 13 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA If the protest does not comply with each of these requirements, it will be rejected as invalid. If the protest is valid, the City's Purchasing Manager, or other designated City staff member, shall review the basis of the protest and all relevant information. The decision from the Purchasing Manager, or her/her designee, is final and no further appeals will be considered. VI. CERTIFICATIONS (ATTACHMENTS) In addition to the SOQ, Narrative/Technical Proposal, and Cost Proposal, the following forms, included in this RFP, shall be signed and included as part of the proposal submittal package: • Attachment A: Proposer's Certification and Proposal Item Pricing • Attachment B: Proposer's Statement • Attachment C: Non-Collusion Affidavit • Attachment D: Non-Lobbying Certification • Attachment E: Non-Discrimination Certification • Attachment F: Subcontractor Designation Form • Attachment G: CARB Fleet Compliance Certification • Attachment H: Statement Regarding CWA Requirements • Attachment I: Sam.gov UEI Verification • Attachment J: Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Inegibility and Voluntary Exclusion • Attachment K: Federal Funding Requirements The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Incomplete proposals will be deemed as nonresponsive and will be rejected. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any commitment will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. PLEASE NOTE: • All forms above must be signed by a representative of the Firm that is legally authorized to contractually bind the Proposer. • City will not waive notarization requirement when applicable on any of the required attachments. VII. REFERENCES Contractor shall provide three (3) references from other similar public agencies for which services similar to those specified in this RFP have been performed, including contact names and telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B — References. The respondent grants permission for the City to contact any individuals listed as references. City may disqualify a Proposer if. - • References fail to substantiate Proposer's description of services and deliverables provided; or • References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or City Council 23 — 14 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA • City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the Proposer's responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City working hours. VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE See Exhibit 11— Sample Agreement IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA A. The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP,which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. B. Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following criteria: CATEGORY POINTS Firm Experience 25 Team Experience 25 Relevant Project Experience 30 Schedule of Delivery 15 References 5 TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE 100 Before interviews—if held Interviews The City reserves the right to conduct interviews with the highest-rated firm(s). In the event the City does perform an interview process, the 20 following is the maximum number of additive points that may be applied to the proposal score. C. Rankings: A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank Proposers. Based upon the foregoing criteria, all proposals shall be ranked by score. Only those proposals receiving a score above 70 will be considered for award. The City reserves the right to award the Agreement to any proposer(s) with a score above 70. The review committee will evaluate proposers based on their response to the RFP and the City evaluation criteria set forth above. D. Interviews: The review committee may invite the Proposers to interview. If invited to interview, Proposers must be prepared to include key personnel in the interview and/or presentation. The City reserves the right to seek additional information from any or all Proposers invited to present proposals. A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank Proposers. City reserves the right to begin negotiations and enter into an Agreement without holding interviews, or further discussions. City Council 23 — 15 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA E. Selection: The City is under no obligation to accept any proposal and reserves the right to negotiate with respondents as to fees and terms. The City may reject proposals at its sole discretion. If proposal fails to satisfy any requirements outlined in this RFP, it may be considered non-responsive and may be rejected. The City shall not be obligated to accept the lowest priced proposals, but will make awards in the best interests of the City after all factors have been evaluated. The review committee will recommend the qualified Proposers to the City Council or City Manager for award of Agreement, as appropriate. X. WITHDRAWALS Proposers are responsible for verifying all prices and information before submitting a proposal. Prior to the proposal due date, the Proposer or Proposer's representative may withdraw the proposal by providing written notice of the proposal withdrawal to the City Contact/Project Manager. Verbal or telephonic withdrawals are not permissible. A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The awarded Contractor hereby certifies that it will comply, as applicable, with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 USC §§ 12101 et seq., and its implementing regulations, including Subtitle A, Title II of the ADA. Contractor will not discriminate against persons with disabilities nor against persons due to their relationship to or association with a person with a disability. Any Agreement entered into by the awarded Contractor (or any subcontract thereof), relating to this RFP, shall be subject to the provisions of this paragraph. B. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE The selected Proposer must obtain a City of Santa Ana Business License prior to the execution of an Agreement and must provide a copy to the Buyer assigned to this RFP. The awarded party shall maintain a current business license throughout the term of the resulting Agreement. Procedure to obtain a City of Santa Ana Business License is available by contacting the Finance and Management Services Agency, Business Tax Office at(714)647- 5447 or on the City's website: www.santa-ana.ora C. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any agreement will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to accept or reject the combined or separate components of this proposal in part or in its entirety or to waive any minor inconsistency, informality or technical defect in the proposal. D. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Contractor shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the best interests of the City. This obligation shall apply to the Contractor; the Contractor's employees, agents, and Subcontractors associated with accomplishing work and services hereunder. The Contractor's efforts shall include, but not be limited to, establishing precautions to prevent its employees, agents, and Subcontractors from providing or offering gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other considerations which could be deemed to influence or appear to influence City staff or elected officers from acting in the best interests of the City. City Council 23 — 16 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Each Proposer must disclose any existing or potential conflict of interest relative to the performance of the contractual services resulting from this RFP. Any such relationship that might be perceived or represented as a conflict should be disclosed. The City reserves the right to disqualify any Proposer on the grounds of actual or apparent conflict of interest. No person, firm, or subsidiary thereof who has been awarded this Agreement may be awarded an Agreement for the provision of services, the delivery of supplies, or the provision of any other related action which is required, suggested, or otherwise deemed appropriate as an end product of this Agreement. Therefore, Contractor is precluded from contracting for any work recommended as a result of this Agreement. E. CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE Pre-Contractual Expenses: The City is not liable for any costs incurred by Proposers prior to entering into a formal Agreement. Costs of developing a response to this RFP, are entirely the responsibility of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed in any manner by the City. Pre-contractual expenses are not to be included in the cost proposal. Pre-contractual expenses include, but are not limited to, preparation of the proposal, submission of the proposal and additional information, attendance at pre-proposal conference, negotiating any matter related to this RFP with City, and/or any other expenses incurred by the Proposer prior to the date of award and execution, if any, of the Agreement. Other Expenses: The Contractor will be responsible for all costs related to photo copying, telephone communications, fax communications, overhead, travel, and parking while on City sites during the performance of work and services under this Agreement. F. CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER/KEY PERSONNEL Except as formally approved by the City, the key personnel identified in Contractor's proposal shall be the individuals who will actually complete the work. Changes in staffing must be reported in writing and approved by the City. The City shall have the right to require the removal and replacement of the Contractor's Project Manager and key personnel under the awarded Agreement. The City shall notify the Contractor in writing of such action. The City is not required to provide any reason, rationale, or additional factual information if it elects to request any specific key personnel be removed from performing services under the awarded Agreement. The City shall review and approve the appointment of the replacement for the Contractor's personnel. Said approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Standards of Conduct: Contractor's personnel shall be courteous and maintain good working relationships with all stakeholders, state or outside agencies, community members, other team members and staff within the City. G. COST PROPOSAL The awarded Contractor agrees to provide the purchased services at the costs, rates, and fees as set forth in their Fee Schedule in response to this RFP. No other costs, rates or fees shall be payable to the awarded Subcontractor for implementation of their proposal. H. DATA RETENTION Contractor shall be responsible for retaining data, records, and documentation for the preparation of required items. These materials shall be made available to and as requested by City. City Council 23 — 17 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA All materials, documents, data or information obtained from the City Data files or any City medium furnished to Contractor in the performance of an awarded Agreement will at all times remain the property of the City. Such data or information may not be used or copied for direct or indirect use by Contractor after completion or termination of this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. All materials, documents, data or information, including copies, must be returned to the City at the end of the Agreement. All data, documents and other products used, developed, or produced during response preparation of the RFP will become property of the City. All responses to the RFP shall become property of the City. Proposer information identified as proprietary shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act. I. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE The awarded Contractor certifies compliance with Government Code Section 8355 in matters relating to providing a drug-free workplace. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the Agreement or termination of the Agreement or both, and the Contractor may be ineligible for award of any future City Agreements. J. EXAMINATION Proposer represents that it has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the services and responsibilities required by this RFP and that it is capable of effectively and efficiently performing quality work to achieve the City's objectives. Any attachments referenced herein or any interpretations, clarifications or amendments subsequently posted in relation to this RFP are fully incorporated. Any irregularities or lack of clarity in the RFP should be brought to the designated City Contact/Project Manager's attention as soon as possible so that corrective addenda may be furnished to prospective Proposers. Proposals which appear unrealistic in the terms of technical commitments, lack of technical competence, or are indicative of failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of this Agreement, may be rejected. K. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT Upon successful negotiations, the City and the selected Proposer will enter into an Agreement similar to that as shown in EXHIBIT II — Sample Agreement of this RFP. If a Proposer is unwilling or unable to execute an Agreement within thirty (30) days after being notified of selection under this RFP, the City reserves the right to disqualify them without any further obligation L. FEDERAL GRANT CONTRACT PROVISIONS Proposer must agree to the federal contract provisions outlined in the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR Part 200.326. These provisions will become part of the agreement resulting from this bid. M. FISCAL NONFUNDING CLAUSE In the event sufficient budgeted funds are not available for a new fiscal period, the City shall retain the right to notify the provider of such occurrence in writing at least thirty (30) days before the end of the current fiscal period and terminate the Agreement on the last day of the current fiscal period without penalty or expense to the City. The City's fiscal period is July 1 St through June 30" City Council 23 — 18 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA N. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Contractor is considered an independent Contractor and neither Contractor, its employees, nor anyone working under Contractor will be considered an agent or an employee of City. Neither Contractor, its employees, nor anyone working under Contractor, will qualify for workers' compensation or other fringe benefits of any kind through City. O. JOINT OFFERS/SUBCONSULTANTS Where two or more Proposers desire to submit a single proposal in response to this RFP, they should do so on a prime sub-consultant basis. The City intends to contract with a single firm, also known as the prime, and not with multiple firms doing business as a joint venture. Should the use of sub-consultants be offered, the Proposer shall provide the same assurances of competence for the sub-consultant plus the demonstrated ability to manage and supervise the subcontracted work. Sub-consultants shall not be allowed to further subcontract with others for work under the Agreement. The provisions of the Agreement shall apply to all sub-consultants in the same manner as the Proposer. The proposer is responsible for all the actions taken by their sub-contractor. The City reserves the right to reject, replace and approve any and all Subcontractors. All Subcontractor(s)shall be identified in the response to the RFP and the City reserves the right to reject any proposed Subcontractor(s). Subcontractors shall be the responsibility of the prime Contractor and the City shall assume no liability of such Subcontractors. P. LITIGATION STATUS Each Proposer must include in its proposal a complete disclosure of any alleged significant prior or ongoing contract failures, any civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending which involves the Proposer or in which the Proposer has been judged guilty or liable. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision will disqualify any proposal. The City reserves the right to reject any proposal based upon the Proposer's prior history with the City or with any other party, which documents, without limitation, unsatisfactory performance, adversarial or contentious demeanor, significant failure(s) to meet contract milestones or other contractual failures. Q. NEGOTIATIONS The City reserves the right to negotiate final Agreement terms with any Proposer selected. The Agreement between the parties will consist of the RFP together with any modifications thereto, and the awarded Contractor's proposal, together with any modifications and clarifications thereto that are submitted at the request of the City during the evaluation and negotiation process. In the event of any conflict or contradiction between or among these documents, the documents shall control in the following order of precedence: the final executed Agreement, the RFP, any modifications and clarifications to the awarded Contractor's proposal, and the awarded Contractor's proposal. Specific exceptions to this general rule may be noted in the final executed Agreement. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Contractors unless and until an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, the City reserves the right to negotiate a contract with another Contractor or withdraw the RFP. R. NON-PAYMENTS Note that payments will NOT be made for any unsatisfactory work until corrected. In the event of nonpayment of undisputed sums by the City, Contractor shall give the City thirty (30) working days to cure the alleged breach. City Council 23 — 19 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA S. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS The City has permanent ownership of all directly connected and derivative materials produced under this Agreement by the Contractor. All documents, reports and other incidental or derivative work or materials furnished hereunder shall become and remains the sole property of the City and may be used by the City as it may require without additional cost to the City. Contractor shall provide the City copies of documents upon its request at any time. None of the documents, reports and other incidental or derivative work or furnished materials shall be used by the Contractor without the express written consent of the City. T. PARKING The City will not provide free parking and/or reimbursement for the cost of parking while providing services and conducting business with the City. U. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS Contractor staff shall be courteous to the public and City staff utilizing facilities where Contractor is performing work, but shall be responsive only to the requests of the City's Project Manager or designee. Contractor staff shall direct all inquiries to Project Manager or designee. Contractor acknowledges that City locations consist of public-use facilities and recognizes the obligation to ensure Contractor personnel and agents maintain the highest level of professional standards in attire, decorum, and interaction with the public and City personnel. V. PROJECT MANAGER The selected Proposer will assume responsibility for all services in its proposal. The selected Proposer shall identify a sole point of contact, Project Manager, with the greatest knowledge in regard to the required service operations and contractual matters, including payment of any and all charges resulting from the Agreement. W. PROPOSAL VALIDITY Services, pricing, and warranties indicated in a Proposer's Proposal must be valid for a period of 180 days at minimum after the submission of the Proposal. X. PUBLIC AGENCIES Other public agencies, as defined by California Government Code Section 6500, may choose to use the terms of this Agreement, subject to Contractor's acceptance. The City is not liable or responsible for any obligations related to a subsequent Agreement between Contractor and another public agency. Y. PUBLIC RECORDS Proposals will become public record after the award of an Agreement unless the proposal or specific parts of the proposal can be shown to be exempt by law. Each Proposer may clearly label all or part of a proposal as"CONFIDENTIAL" provided that the Proposer thereby agrees to indemnify and defend the City for honoring such a designation. The failure to so label any information that is released by the City shall constitute a complete waiver of any and all claims for damages caused by any release of the information. Proposer information identified as proprietary shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act. City Council 23 — 20 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Z. SUBCONTRACTORS Proposals in response to this RFP must identify any Subcontractors, and outline the contractual relationship between the Awarded Subcontractor and each Subcontractor. An official of each proposed Subcontractor must sign, and include as part of the proposal submitted by the Prime Contractor, a statement to the effect that the Subcontractor has read and will agree to abide by the awarded Contractor's obligations. Any Subcontractor proposed after award of Agreement must be approved by the City before commencement of work. The City will look solely to the awarded Contractor for the performance of all contractual obligations which may result from an award based on this RFP, and the awarded Contractor shall not be relieved for the non-performance of any or all Subcontractors. XII. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS A. PREVAILING WAGE The Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has ascertained the prevailing rate of per diem wages in dollars, based on a working day of eight hours, for each craft or type of worker or mechanic needed to execute any construction or maintenance contract, which may be awarded by Public Works. The current prevailing wage rates as adopted by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations are incorporated herein by reference and may be accessed at http://www.dir.ca.gov/ (General Prevailing Wage determination made by the Director of Industrial Relations / Pursuant to California Labor Code Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 1770, 1773 and 1773.1). Contractor is required to pay the prevailing wage rate referred to above and is responsible for selecting the craft/classification of workers which will be required to perform this service in accordance with the Contractor's method of performing the work. Pursuant to Section 1775 of the Labor Code (State of California) Contractor shall forfeit $50 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage rates for any public work done under this Contract or by any subcontractor. Prevailing Wage Compliance and Monitoring Contractor is aware of the requirements of the California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirement on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Since the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by Prevailing Wage Laws and since the total compensations is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement/Contact. Contact shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the job site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. B. DIR REGISTRATION This project is a public work and subject to the following: No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 City Council 23 — 21 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)]. No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractors are further cautioned that certified payrolls shall be submitted electronically directly to the Department of Industrial Relations. C. CAL-OSHA VEHICLE REGULATION All vehicles must meet California Motor Vehicle and Cal-OSHA regulations and all other applicable codes required for vehicle use on the roads or highways in the state of California. D. CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Contractor shall comply, and shall ensure all subcontractors comply, with all applicable requirements of the most current version of the regulations imposed by California Air Resources Board ("CARB") including, without limitation, all applicable terms of Title 13, California Code of Regulations Division 3, Chapter 9 and all pending amendments ("Regulation"). Throughout the Project, and for three (3) years thereafter, Contractor shall make available for inspection and copying any and all documents or information associated with Contractor's and its subcontractors' fleets including, without limitation, the Certificates of Reported Compliance ("CRCs"), fuel/refueling records, maintenance records, emissions records, and any other information the Contractor is required to produce, keep or maintain pursuant to the Regulation upon two (2) calendar days' notice from the City. Contractor shall be solely liable for any and all costs associated with compliance with the Regulation as well as for any and all penalties, fines, damages, or costs associated with any and all violations, or failures to comply with the Regulation. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees and authorized volunteers free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Regulation. E. QUALITY ASSURANCE Contractor shall provide laborers and supervisors who are thoroughly familiar with the type of construction involved and materials and techniques specified. F. COMMUNITY WORFORCE AGREEMENT For projects with bids greater than $750,000 for prime multi-trade construction contracts (including all subcontractors)or over$100,000 for specialty contracts(contracts either limited to a single trade or craft or limited to a singular scope of work), the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA). This project is considered a specialty contract. The CWA is a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA is incorporated by reference in the Construction Contract. A copy of the CWA may be found in EXHIBIT IV. G. CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT City Council 23 — 22 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Contractor shall keep work areas clean and free from any debris, rubbish, hazardous waste and non-usable material resulting from the work under this Contract and shall be disposed of at the completion of each work day by the Contractor. Hazardous waste must be disposed of in accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and all other applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. H. CHEMICALS Handling and delivery of all materials must comply with all local, State, and Federal safety regulations and must maintain appropriate hazardous material transportation and handling certifications and licensing as applicable. I. SAFETY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Work Site Safety shall be as defined by the Standard Specifications and these special provisions: Contractor shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all work performed under the contract is performed in strict compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local occupational safety regulations. Consultant/Contractor shall provide at its expense all safeguards, safety devices and protective equipment, and shall take any and all actions appropriate to providing a safe Project site. The following is required in addition to the requirements of the Standard Specification: a. Contractor shall train all employees, or subcontractor personnel in the work practices necessary to safely perform his or her job. b. Contractor shall identify all known potential hazards related to the work performed and train all employees and subcontractor personnel on how to handle the potential hazards. c. Contractor, their employees and subcontractors shall follow all safety rules and safe work practices. d. Contractor will immediately notify the City of any significant and/or unusual hazards found during the course of work. e. Contractor shall submit copies of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for all hazardous materials to be utilized on site in the performance of work. f. Contractor is solely responsible for the legal disposal of hazardous waste generated in the performance of their work. Safety Indemnification: To the extent allowed by law, the Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all investigations, complaints, citations, liability, expense (including defense costs and legal fees), claims and/or causes of action for damages of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to injury or death to employees of the Contractor, its subcontractors or City, attributable to any alleged act or omission of the Contractor or its subcontractors which is in violation of any Cal OSHA regulation. The obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless includes all investigations and proceedings associated with purported violations of Section 336.10 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations pertaining to multi-employer work sites. The City may deduct from any payment otherwise due the Contractor any costs incurred or anticipated to be incurred by the Agency, including legal fees and staff costs, associated with any investigation or enforcement proceedings brought by Cal OSHA arising out of the assigned work. J. OTHER SAFETY REQUIREMENTS City Council 23 — 23 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions, as directed by the City, or in the absence of such direction, in accordance with sound industrial practices, to safeguard and protect City property and adjacent property. Damages to properties caused by Contractor's negligence shall be repaired at no cost (both labor and material)to the City. Contractor is responsible for advising and ensuring compliance by Contractor's employees with all applicable environmental and hazardous materials handling laws and regulations. Contractor shall provide City a full report of damage to City property and/or equipment by Contractor's employees. All damage reports shall be submitted to the Site Coordinator within twenty-four (24) hours of occurrence. Contractor shall provide, erect, and maintain all warning devices (i.e., barricades, cones, etc.) as required or necessary to ensure the safety of the public, City, and Contractor's employees. K. SPILL LIABILITY The City does not assume liability for spills or other releases of hazardous wastes which are caused by the negligence of the contractor once hazardous waste materials are in the possession of the contractor or transported off site. L. RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTS Contractor is required to provide upon request, detailed data and information required by the City. Information may include: generator EPA ID, contractor EPA ID, generator name, waste description, manifest number and line number, date waste shipped, disposal and recycling facilities utilized, final disposal method utilized, quantity shipped (pounds), waste profile number, and any additional information requested. All records and reports shall be available in electronic (including Excel, Word, and PDF Format) and hard copy format at all times during the term of the contract. XIII. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS A. FEDERAL AID CONTRACT PROVISIONS Proposers are advised that this project is federally funded and they shall comply with all federal requirements in the Agreement. B. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DBE) Proposers are advised, as required by federal law, that the City is implementing DBE requirements for the project and has established a 4% DBE goal. To meet this requirement, proposer must comply with the DBE requirements set forth in the Agreement and Attachment 4 of this RFP. Proposers shall particular attention to Exhibit 10-1 Notice to Proposers DBE Information and follow the instructions for submitting the proper DBE information including, but not limited to, Exhibit 10-01: Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment and documenting adequate good faith efforts. B. CALTRANS ATTACHMENTS Attachment L includes the following forms for reference and submitting. The forms can be found at: httos://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/forms/local-assistance-r)rocedures- manual-forms. City Council 23 — 24 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Please reference Caltrans Local Assistance Procedure Manual, Consultant Selection, Chapter 10, for further instructions and guidelines pertaining to the completion of these forms:https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/local- assistance/documents/lapm/ch 10.pdf XIV. AWARD OF AGREEMENT Selected Contractor(s) will be notified in writing. Any award is contingent upon the successful negotiation of final Agreement terms. A. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT A standard agreement is included as EXHIBIT II Sample Agreement of this RFP. "Proposer" will hereinafter be referred to as "Consultant" or "Contractor" in standard agreement. The term of the agreement will begin after the agreement is fully executed, and all required bonds, insurance documents and contents of the payment information packet have been received and approved. XV. IMPLEMENTATION A. KICK-OFF MEETINGS The successful proposer will be required to meet with City staff prior to commencement of services or at any time as required by the City, to discuss and agree on operational issues including transition of services and scheduling. B. NOTICE TO PROCEED Prior to issuance of a formal Notice to Proceed (NTP), Consultants shall provide all required bonds, insurance documents, and contents of the Information Packet for review and approval by the City. "On-Call" contracts require the City Project Managers to request a project/task proposal from Consultants on an "as-needed" basis. Proposals will then be evaluated by City Staff and written NTPs will be issued accordingly per task order. City Council 23 — 25 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT I SCOPE OF SERVICES CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (BPMP) RFP NO. 25-081 A INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana requests proposals from qualified professional engineering consultants to prepare the plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate (PS&E), and construction support services for the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program maintenance work of eight (8) bridges. The City in January 2016 prepared its Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) plan that identified 22 bridges. In 2020, the BPMP plan was reevaluated with 8 bridges as top priority and would be eligible for Federal Highway Bridge Program funding to preserve their service life. A copy of the location map and BPMP plan are provided in Attachment 6. SCOPE OF WORK The City of Santa Ana is inviting proposals from experienced and responsive consultants (Consultant)to: 1. Review and field verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided BPMP Plan and most recent Inspection Reports. 2. Field review and identify any and all other maintenance work necessary on these Bridges to bring them to current conformance with the Caltrans inspection criteria and standards. 3. Prepare construction-ready Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimates for the eight (8) bridges. 4. Prepare and file the environmental documents for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). 5. Obtain encroachment and regulatory permit(s) and pay the necessary fees with Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) and any regulatory agencies for access and/or construction work within their jurisdictions. 6. Provide bid administration services from bid advertisement to City Council construction contract award. 7. Assist City with construction administration support throughout construction. 8. Prepare As-built plans upon construction completion. City Council 23 — 26 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA CONSULTANT SERVICES The Consultant's services shall include the following tasks: Consultant is responsible for providing all design and engineering as required for all components within the project scope of work which includes, but is not limited to the preparation and submittal of the PS&E package through completion with the approval from City to release for construction. This includes but is not limited to survey, civil design, structural design, technical investigation and report (for soils analysis), etc. Consultant will also be responsible for facilitating monthly virtual progress meetings with City Staff to obtain input and discuss any project related items as well as provide project schedule. Consultant shall provide review sets in .pdf format. Final plans shall be provided in AutoCAD or Microstation format, and .pdf format. A. PROJECT COORDINATION. The Consultant shall be fully responsible for the overall management and coordination for the project, which may include, but is not limited to project development team meetings, liaison with affected agencies, and utility companies. Prepare progress report and schedule, securing permits for all field studies, construction access, and any other required permits from other agencies. B. RECORDS RESEARCH. Research all information pertinent to the project including, but not limited to existing field condition, as-built plans and record drawings, right-of-way data and all future improvement plans adjacent to or affecting the project site. The selected Consultant shall identify all existing and proposed facilities within the projects limits and potential conflicts. C. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE. The Consultant shall prepare, distribute, and file any environmental noticing, documents, preparation of studies and technical reports for environmental clearances that may be needed for the project to meet state and federal funding. This includes, but is not limited to federal, state, and local regulations, policies and procedures as they pertain to CEQA, NEPA, PES form, environmental studies, environmental site assessment, and environmental reports. D. REGULATORY PERMITS. The Consultant shall provide services to process regulatory permits if deem necessary for the project. The regulatory agency includes, but not limit to, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Pre-Construction Notification, Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Certification, and CA Department of Fish &Wildlife Streambed Alteration Agreement Certification. E. PRELIMINARY DESIGN. The consultant shall organize a kick-off meeting with City staff to discuss the conceptual design plan, project goals and objectives, potential elements and issues, project schedule, review of existing information, and conduction of a site investigation. F. SURVEY. On-the-ground field topographical survey work is to be determined by the Consultant (and/or the Consultant's Subconsultant) if any existing horizontal and vertical features are needed for the project. It is the Consultant's responsibility to provide only the survey necessary for the design of the project components identified within this RFP. Consultant shall identify in the proposal a detail list of features the survey would include. Design level survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a California licensed Land Surveyor in City Council 23 — 27 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA accordance with the City guidelines and in Microstation CONNECT Computer Aided design and Drafting (CADD)format.The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. G. WATER QUALITY. The Consultant shall coordinate with the City for the Low Impact Development (LID)requirements of the project and prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)if deemed required. Consultant shall provide BMPs with appropriate size based on treatment and peak flow rates, freight to job site and one year of maintenance to include units and cost in the engineer's cost estimate. The selection of Best Management Practices (BMPs)will always be subject to site specific conditions and the Consultant will be required to perform the research into the site specific conditions (e.g. prior contamination, depth to groundwater, soil conditions, interfering utilities, etc.) that could preclude infiltration.The Consultant shall also perform the required soils and/or infiltration testing per the Technical Guidance Documents, as necessary to design the infiltration system assuming it is the selected LID approach. Please find information and links to relevant documents and regulations at the following site: http://ocwatersheds.com/documents/wgmp. H. PUBLIC OUTREACH. None at this time. However, allow one outreach preparation and meeting for fee proposal purposes. I. UTILITY COORDINATION. The Consultant shall be responsible for all utility coordination efforts, including but not limited to; coordination with Edison for any electrical service connections, and water service connections for irrigation and water fountains. J. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) c Development of Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E): a) All reports, plans, specifications and quantity calculations shall conform to criteria, policies, procedures and standards of the City. The Consultant shall use the boilerplate for cut sheets, specifications and estimates provided by the City. b) The plan development shall include three (3) milestone deliverables-30%, 60%, 90% (pre-final) and 100% (final). All plan sheets shall be prepared at a reasonable standard scale to be noted on plans. The necessary plans for each PS&E package shall include, but are not be limited to: Task 1:Design Development(30%plans) Design development will involve the schematic development of plans based on the approved conceptual design plan,which shall include but is not limited to survey, civil design, geotechnical investigation and report (for soils analysis), infiltration testing, architectural design, landscape architectural design, structural design, interior design, furniture selection, electrical engineering, mechanical and plumbing engineering, draft technical specifications and "opinion of estimated cost'. ➢ Deliverables shall include a 30% set of plans, including site section studies, draft specification, "Opinion of Probable Cost". Task 2: Construction Documents (60% 90% and 100%plans) Construction Documents (CDs) shall include finalizing approved deliverables from the Design Development phase. This includes the provision of detailed engineering and construction drawings that will serve as the basis for both bidding and construction by a general contractor. City Council 23 — 28 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ➢ Deliverables shall include 60%, 90% and 100% plans, structural calculations, final technical specifications, finalized "Opinion of Probable Cost". 100% plans will go through a constructability review that could lead to comments and recommendations that should also be addressed and completed as part of this deliverable. Plans: Plans shall include, but are not limited to the following: • Title Sheet • Civil Engineering o Site Erosion Plan, if any o Horizontal and Vertical Control Plan o Site Utility Plan • Structural Engineering o Structural Design and Detailing Technical Specifications Technical specifications for all components listed above shall be provided by Consultant, or their Sub- consultants, to the City in CSI (Construction Specifications Institute) format. Consultant shall coordinate language between the general and technical specifications to ensure conflicts are minimized. City Staff will provide the City Boiler Plate which together, will become the Project Manual. Final Opinion of Probable Cost Consultant shall provide updated opinion of probable construction cost which shall reflect finalized plans, materials, systems, details of construction, and known or anticipated changes in the bidding market relative to the project. Should project scope exceed available budget, project plans/specifications will be phased as appropriate. Task 3:Bid Advertisement, Construction Administration, Record Drawings Bid Advertisement Bidding procedures will be the responsibility of the City. While the PS&E construction package is advertising for bids, all questions concerning the intent shall be referred to the City for resolution. In the event that any item requiring interpretation in the drawings or specifications is discovered during the bidding period, said items shall be analyzed by the Consultant for decision by the City. Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Consultant shall also attend pre-bid meeting, if scheduled. Construction Administration Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Construction Administration phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, and/or reviewing submittals. Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required to support the construction contract. Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two (2) working days of receipt. Consultant shall be available as requested by the City to resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Consultant shall bring to the attention of the City any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant may observe. Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City, or to deputize another to do so. City Council 23 — 29 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Record Drawings/As-built Plans: Upon construction completion, the City will submit field-marked prints to Consultant. Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations, signature, and submit to the City. FEE PROPOSAL In addition to Section IV.B.3 (Submittal Requirements: Fee Proposal) fee schedule shall be structured to correspond to the above mentioned tasks as follows: Task 1: Design Development Task 2: Construction Documents Task 3: Bid Advertisement, Construction Administration, Record Drawings Total Fee: Fee schedule for each task should include an hourly breakdown that corresponds to the task total and shall include all fees associated with encroachment/regulatory permits. The city reserves the right to add or reduce some of the above tasks and duties as it sees fit. The consultant, serving as staff extension, shall remain sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of the City and of the project. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein. • Furnish scope of work and provide general direction as needed for the assigned project. • Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities. • Follow City of Santa Ana Invoicing guidelines. • As-Built Plans (if available) CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES Consultant shall provide all required insurance as outlines in EXHIBIT II of this RFP. PAYMENT AND INVOICING Selected Consultant shall invoice the City based on time and material according to the City's standard invoice template. Tasks and hours shall be clearly identified and all rates must match those included in the approved agreement. City Council 23 — 30 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT II SAMPLE AGREEMENT CONSULTANT-AGREEMENT CITY OF SANTA ANA THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this day of 20_ by and between , ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a Consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of: B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Compensation - Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $xxxxxx. b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45)days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on [enter a Start Date or "the date first written above"] for a number(#) year term with the option for the City to grant up to a number (#)-year renewals, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 15, below. 4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent Consultant and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer- employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; City Council 23 — 31 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 5. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs,and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 6. INSURANCE Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. MINIMUM SCOPE OF INSURANCE Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal&advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the Contractor's profession, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. If the contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above,the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the contractor. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: Additional Insured Status The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used). City Council 23 — 32 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Primary Coverage For any claims related to this contract,the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Notice of Cancellation Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. Waiver of Subrogation Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. Self-Insured Retentions Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Claims Made Policies If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage: 1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date,the Contractor must purchase"extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five(5) years after completion of work. Verification of Coverage Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. Special Risks or Circumstances City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 7. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and City Council 23 — 33 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement;and(2)from any claim that personal injury, damages,just compensation, restitution,judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages,just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution,judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor. 8. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 9. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 10. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually,electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b)is,through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c)is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or(e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 12. NON-DISCRIMINATION City Council 23 — 34 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 13. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Contractor, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto,the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 14. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment,transfer,delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Contractors retained by City. 15. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty(30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach,failure of any condition,or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy,whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 18. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES City Council 23 — 35 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals,waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 19. NOTICE Any notice,tender,demand,delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax: 714-647-6956 With courtesy copies to: Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-36) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax: To Contractor: First& Last Name Title Consultant Firm Name Address City, State, Zip Fax: A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter,any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. The Agreement is the final and complete agreement and any prior or contemporaneous City Council 23 — 36 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA agreements for similar services between the parties is superseded by this Agreement. This shall not apply where the Parties are currently engaged and Consultant is providing services not contemplated by this Agreement. C. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA Jennifer L. Hall Alvaro Nunez City Clerk City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO CONSULTANT: City Attorney By: Assistant City Attorney (name) (title) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Executive Director Public Works Agency SAMPLE ONLY City Council 23 — 37 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT III FEDERAL REGULATIONS Federal Regulations—Recipient must comply with the government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements and audit requirements for federal grant program housed within Title 2, Part 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations. b. Debarment and Suspension — As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 CFR §200.212 and codified in 2 CFR Part 200, Recipient must provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the Federal government. C. Audit Records -With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall be made available for audit and inspection by CITY, the grant agency and/or their duly authorized representatives for a period of three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the City of Santa Ana. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Recipient shall preserve and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time period, Recipient shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises of Recipient, upon request during usual working hours. d. Reports - Recipient shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or agencies. e. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) - All recipients of federal funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act). Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Recipient agrees it will ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be binding on all of its contractors, subcontractors, assignees or successors. f. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - (ADA) Recipient must comply with all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable. g. Political Activity - None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of the provisions of the "Hatch Act". h. No Lobbying - Recipient will comply with all applicable lobbying prohibitions and laws, including those found in the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352, et seq.), and agrees that none of the funds provided under this award may be expended by the Recipient to pay any person to influence, or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer City Council 23 — 38 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any federal action concerning the award or renewal of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. i. Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972, as amended; Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, as amended; Section 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912, as amended; Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and 39. In the event a Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative agency, or the Recipient makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Recipient will forward a copy of the findings to CITY which will, in turn, submit the findings to the Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. If applicable, recipient will comply with the equal opportunity clause in 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375. j. Equal Employment Opportunity - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as applicable. k. Public Contracts Code- Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the California Public Contract Code Section 10295.3, as applicable. I. Copeland Anti-Kickback Act - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors and subcontractors (or subrecipients) shall comply, with all requirements of the Copeland "Anti-Kickback" Act (30 U.S.C. 3145) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable. (1) Contractor — Contractors shall comply with 18 U.S.C. § 874, 40 U.S.C. § 3145, and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt. 3 as may be applicable, which are incorporated by reference into this contract. (2) Subcontracts — Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clause above and such other clauses as FEMA may by appropriate instructions require, and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all of these contract clauses. (3) Breach—A breach of the contract clauses above may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment as a contractor and subcontractor as provided in 29 C.F.R. § 5.12. M. Davis-Bacon Act - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144 and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. City Council 23 — 39 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA Contractors are required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate no less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. Additionally, contractors are required to pay wages not less than once a week. n. Work Hours and Safety - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. o. Clean Air Act - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all applicable standards, orders or requirements issued under the Clean Air Act(42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q), and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387), as applicable. P. Energy and Conservation- Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201), as applicable. q. Waste Disposal - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as applicable. r. Patent Rights - Recipient agrees that the Department of Homeland Security shall have the authority to seek patent rights for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding through this Agreement based on the requirements of 37 CFR§ 401 and any other implementing regulations, as applicable. S. Copyright - Recipient may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding agency, State Administrative Agency(SAA)and City reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and/or City purpose: (1) the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and (2) any rights of copyright to which the subcontractor purchases ownership with support through this grant. The Federal government's, SAA's and City's rights identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the publisher's release form must ensure the preservation of these rights. t. Telecommunications (2 CFR 200.216)- Recipient will comply with FEMA Policy 405-143- 1, Prohibitions on Expending FEMA Award Funds on Covered Telecommunication Equipment or Services (Interim), which prohibits grant recipients and subrecipients from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to procure or obtain, extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, or to enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is: City Council 23 — 40 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA (1) Telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (2) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (3) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment. (4) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. U. Domestic preferences for procurements (2 CFR 200.322) - Recipient agrees that as appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, it will, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). This requirement must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of this provision: "produced in the United States" means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States; and "manufactured products" means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber. V. Equal Employment in Construction Contracts - Pursuant to Equal Employment Opportunity requirements of 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375, as to any construction contract thereunder, if applicable, during the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows: (1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. City Council 23 — 41 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA (2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information. (4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (7) In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. (8) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs(1)through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. City Council 23 — 42 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT IV COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) For projects with bids greater than $750,000 for prime multi-trade construction contracts (including all subcontractors) or over$100,000 for specialty contracts (contracts either limited to a single trade or craft or limited to a singular scope of work), the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA). This project is considered a specialty contract. The CWA is a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA is incorporated by reference in the Construction Contract. A copy of the CWA may be on the City's website at www.santa-ana.org/documents/community-workforce- agreement/. FOR PROPOSERS' REFERENCE ONLY City Council 23 — 43 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT V BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS PLEASE SEE BELOW City Council 23 — 44 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 California Department of Transportation Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance and Investigations BRIDGE NSPECTION CORDS NFORMATION SYSTEM The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS. These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual. Records for "Confidential" bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. City Council 23 — 45 8/4/2026 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Mainte BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT 4r* _ EX_H�B�T2 Routine Inspectionaffim_w -- BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE: 55CO055 SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL February 7, 2023 BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION (9)LOCATION 0.2 MI N/O ROUTE 5 FWY (7)FACILITY CARRIED MAIN ST (11)POSTMILE 0 (6)FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL (16)LATITUDE 33°46'14.94" (5)INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000 (17)LONGITUDE 117°52'01.99" (104)ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION (58)DECK 7 GOOD DECK AREA(M)2 1,942 (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 92.4 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A (62)CULVERT N N/A(NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT(SD)STATUS NOT SD (67)STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING OR PIL PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION Routine-Roadway View(02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View(02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View(02/13/2019) TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo o QR13FESS/0,yq� REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo Edwin Mah INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah No. 27141 jO Exp. 03/31/2025 9/11/2023 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) Date tE `FD�P City Council 23 — 46 4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 55C0055/AAAK/102827 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations STRUCTURE OVERVIEW AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION (1)STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069 (90)INSPECTION DATE 02/23(91)FREQUENCY 48 MO (2)HIGHWAY DISTRICT 12 (92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE (3)COUNTY CODE (55)ORANGE A)NSTM INSP N-NO MO A) N/A (4)PLACE CODE (69000)SANTA ANA B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A (21)MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI C)OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A (22)OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI (98)BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE N/A (99)BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (27) YEAR BUILT 1918 (45)MAIN SPANS 5 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT (106)YEAR MODIFIED 1975 (46)APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04:TEE BEAM (34)SKEW 0 (48)MAX SPAN(M) 19.5 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (49)LENGTH (M) 61.9 (35)STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112)NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 0 NO.OF HINGES 0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Five span continuous CIP RC"T" beam (12 each)supported by RC pier walls and open end RC diaphragm abutments on unknown foundation (original construction)and spread footing. Widening from both sides. Four span continuous CIP RC"T beam (2 each)supported by RC pier walls and open end RC diaphragm abutments, all on steel piles. SPAN CONFIGURATION Original: (S)5 @ 40.0 feet(N). 1st widening.: (S)48.9 feet, 3 @ 40.0 feet, 48.9 feet(N). 2nd Wid.: (S)64.0 feet, 2 @ 40.0 feet, 48.9 feet(N). OPERATIONAL I LOAD CAPACITY (31)DESIGN LOAD 2 M 13.5(H 15) (65)CALC METHOD 1 LF LOAD FACTOR (66)INVENTORY RATING RF=1.46=>47.3 metric tons (63)CALC METHOD 1 LF LOAD FACTOR (64)OPERATING RATING RF=2.43=>78.7 metric tons (70)BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS (41)STRUCTURE STATUS A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING PPPPP OVERLAY THICKNESS 3 inches POSTING LOADS Safe Existing Posting Loads Ordinance/Order Signs Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons NONE Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Speed 35 N/A N/A MPH Additional Signs NONE Posting Date N/A Load Rating Summary Date 04/05/2013 Load Rating Type Calculated Load Rating Tool-Date BDS-07/23/80 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53)MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54)MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M City Council 23 — 47 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. The channel is dry. The pedestrian access under the bridge to span 1 is from southwest quadrant and the vehicular parking is at the northwest quadrant. No access to span 5,the easterly side CLF has an opening from the north end and homeless were living underneath. No access to the southerly half of The area under span 1 (Abutment 1)was fenced and locked. Transients have been camping underneath span 5(Abutment 6)even though this area was fenced with Chain Link Fence but it was cut by homeless. DECK AND ROADWAY Bridge deck has an Asphalt Overlay about 3.0 inches thick with cracks. There is about 1.0 inch settlement at the northeast corner of the sidewalk. Westerly sidewalk has map cracks at(0.04 inches wide and 12.0 inches in spacing)with delamination inside the exterior face. The westerly concrete rail has an unsound concrete area at(15.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W) in span 2 at 10.0 feet south of pier wall 2. The following is the locations of Span 2 with soffit cracks and spalls: Bays 3 to 9, deck soffit have several transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence. Bay 4, deck soffit has three spalls at(6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed and corroded rebars. Bay 6, deck soffit has a spall at(6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed and corroded rebars. Bay 8, deck soffit has a spall (6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed and corroded rebars just north of the intermediate diaphragm. In addition, Bay 9, deck soffit has 4 transverse cracks at(0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long with white and brown efflorescence. The following is the locations of Span 3 with soffit cracks and spalls: Bay 3, deck soffit has numerous transverse cracks with brown efflorescence. Bay 4, deck soffit has 04 spalls at(10.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch)due to the shallow of concrete cover with exposed and rusted rebars. Bay 5, deck soffit has 3 transverse cracks (up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long)with white and brown efflorescence. Bay 6, deck soffit has a transverse cracks (up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long)with white and brown efflorescence; Bay 7, deck soffit has 2 transverse cracks(up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long)with white and brown efflorescence. Bay 8, deck soffit has two spalls at(10.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with rebar exposed and rusted. The following is the locations of Span 4 with soffit cracks and spalls: Bays 3 to 9, deck soffit have several transverse cracks(up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long)with white and brown efflorescence. Bay 4, deck soffit has a spall at(10.0 inches L X 10.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebars and corroded at the southerly end. Bay 8, deck soffit has numerous small spalls(up to 1.5 inches round spalls)with exposed rebars due to the shallow of concrete cover. Due to the shallow of concrete cover on deck soffit,there are a few areas with exposed rebars inside some of the bays as the following locations: Span 1: Bays 2, deck soffit has an unsound concrete area at(20.0 inches L X 16.0 inches W)about 17.0 feet from the southerly abutment. Bay 8, deck soffit has an unsound concrete area at(12.0 inches L X 12.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)at the north end and it has a potentical of falling off at any time. Bay 10, along the edge of the original overhang, deck soffit has two spalls at(16.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D)about 10.0 and 17.0 feet from the southerly abutment. City Council 23 - 48 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY The following is the locations of Span 2 with deck soffit spalls: Bay 4, deck soffit has three spalls at(24.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebars and corroded. Bay 6, deck soffit hss a spall at(24.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 D)with exposed rebars and corroded. Bay 8, deck soffit has a large spall at(24.0 inches L X 20.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebars and corroded just north of the intermediate diaphragm. The following is the locations of Span 3 with deck soffit spalls Bay 8, deck soffit has two spalls at(24.0 inches L X 10.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebar and rusted. Bay 4, deck soffit has 4 spalls at(20.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)due to the shallow of concrete cover with exposed rebars and rusted. Span 4: Bay 4, deck soffit has a spall at(20.0 inches L X 20.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebar and corroded at the southerly end. Bay 8, deck soffit has numerous small spalls with exposed rebars due to the shallow of concrete cover. The work-recommendation has been made in 2007 for coring bridge deck to determine the condition of deck soffit. Deck soffit patching also included in the work-recommendation on 02/26/2007 but it is not done. SUPERSTRUCTURE There is a sign of abrasion on some of the concrete girders. Girder 9 of span 2 has an unsound concrete area at(1.5 feet X 2.5 feet)at mid-span. Girder 9(easterly original girder)has one longitudinal crack at(0.05 inches wide, 2.0 feet long)at the bottom face; and 3.0 feet long longitudinal crack at 0.05 inches wide. Both cracks are at the midspan 1. SUBSTRUCTURE There are debris and trash under all bridge spans. Pier wall 4 has a hole around the east nose at(3.0 feet D X 15.0 feet L X 3.0 feet W). The pier walls have the following locations with vertical cracks below: Pier wall 2 has two cracks about(0.05 inches wide and 5.0 feet long)right below girder 6 and between girders 7 and 8. Pier wall 3 has only one crack about(0.05 inches wide and 4.0 feet long)right below girder 6. Pier wall 4 has only one crack about(0.05 inches wide and 6.0 feet long)right below girder 6. Pier wall 5 has one crack about(0.03 inches wide and 8.0 feet long)right below girder#7 and one crack at(0.05 inches wide) between girders 5 and 6. Pier wall 4 has a segregation area at(3.0 feet X 10.0 feet)at the southerly face approximately 2.0 feet above the ground level. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/05/2014 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/05/2014. SPECIAL INSPECTION • • STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. City Council 23 - 49 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations DECK AND ROADWAY DECK CROSS SECTION (W) 1.0 foot br, 6.0 feet sw, 87.6 feet, 6.0 feet sw, 1.0 foot br(E). DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION (49) LENGTH 61.9 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 26.7 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 31.1 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE&SUBRTE 000000000000 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.8 M RIGHT 1.8 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 1-ROUTE ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 26.7 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 NO MEDIAN (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE 6-BITUMINOUS (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 26.7 M B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE 0-NONE (68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 TOLERABLE C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE (72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT OVERLAY THICKNESS(inches) 3 inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 37000 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (30) YEAR OF ADT 2019 (109) TRUCK ADT% 1 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (28a) LANES 7 (114) FUTURE ADT 60054 SPEED 35 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 16 Top Flange-RC 2 1925 sq.m 1705 200 20 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 20 0 0 20 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 200 0 200 0 0 (16)Top Flange-RC Deck soffit cracks and spalls. (16-1080)Delamination/Spall/Patched Area Due to the shallow of concrete cover on deck soffit,there are a few areas with exposed rebars inside some of the bays as the following locations: In span#1: Bays#2, deck soffit has an unsound concrete area at(20.0 inches L X 16.0 inches W)about 17.0 feet from the southerly abutment. Bay#8, deck soffit has an unsound concrete area at(12.0 inches L X 12.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)at the north end and it has a potentical of falling off at any time. Bay#10, along the edge of the original overhang, deck soffit has two spalls at(16.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D)about 10.0 and 17.0 feet from the southerly abutment. The following is the locations of Span#2 with deck soffit spalls: Bay#4, deck soffit has three spalls at(24.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebars and corroded. Bay#6, deck soffit hss a spall at(24.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 D)with exposed rebars and corroded. Bay#8, deck soffit has a large spall at(24.0 inches L X 20.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebars and corroded just north of the intermediate diaphragm. The following is the locations of Span#3 with deck soffit spalls Bay# . Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 5 of 9 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations -XHIBIT DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (16-1080)Delamination/Spall/Patched Area Bay#4, deck soffit has 4 spalls at(20.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)due to the shallow of concrete cover with exposed rebars and rusted. Span#4: Bay#4, deck soffit has a spall at(20.0 inches L X 20.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebar and corroded at the southerly end. Bay#8, deck soffit has numerous small spalls with exposed rebars due to the shallow of concrete cover. (16-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The following is the loctions of span#1 with soffit cracks: Bays#3 to#9, deck soffit ha numerous transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence; The following is the locations of Span#2 with soffit cracks and spalls: Bays#3 to#9, , soffit have several transverse cracks with light white and brown efflorescence. Bay#4, deck soffit has three spalls at(6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with rebar exposed and corroded; Bay#6, deck soffit has a spall at(6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with rebar exposed and corroded. Bay#8, deck soffit has a spall (6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with rebar exposed and corroded just north of the intermediate diaphragm. In addition, Bay#9, deck soffit has 4 transverse cracks at(0.04 inches wide, 1.0 to 3.0 feet long with white and brown efflorescence. The following is the locations of Span#3 with soffit cracks and spalls: Bay#3, deck soffit has numerous transverse cracks with brown efflorescence; Bay#4, deck soffit has 04 spalls at(10.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch)due to the concrete cover with exposed rebars and rusted. Bay#5, deck soffit has 3 transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence. Bay#6, deck soffit has a transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence; Bay#7, deck soffit has 2 transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence. Bay#8, deck soffit has two spalls at(10.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with rebar exposed and rusted. The following is the locations of Span#4 with soffit cracks and spalls: Bays#3 to#9, deck soffit have several transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence. Bay#4, deck soffit has a spall at(10.0 inches L X 10.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)with exposed rebars and corroded at the southerly end. Bay#8, deck soffit has numerous small spalls with exposed rebars due to the concrete cover. City Council 23 — 51 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 6 of 9 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations -XHIBIT 2 DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=7 DECK PHOTOGRAPHS _ C - Photo 1 Photo 1 AC Roadway at both of approach and departure lanes JOINT APPROACH . RAIL INFORMATION (36a)Rail Code 1 (36b)Transition 0 (36c)Appr Guardrail 0 (36d)Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 35 MPH JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 331 Railing-RC 2 124 m 118 6 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 1 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 5 0 5 0 0 (331)Railing-RC Map cracks and numerous small spalls inside the exterior of concrete bridge railings. (331-1080)Delamination/Spall/Patched Area The westerly concrete rail has an unsound concrete area at(15.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W) in span#2 at 10.0 feet south of pier wall#2. (331-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) There is about 1.0 inch settlement at the northeast corner of the sidewalk. Westerly sidewalk has map cracks at(0.04 inches wide, 12.0 inches in spacing)with minor delamination inside the exterior face. JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL PHOTOGRAPHS k Photo 1 Photo 1 Metal s ity Council 23 — 52 8/4 2 26 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 7 of 9 55C0055/AAAK/102827 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 713 m 709 4 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 3 0 3 0 0 1130 Cracking(RC and Other) 2 1 0 1 0 0 (110)Girder/Beam-RC Minor cracks and spalls. (110-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area There is a sign of abrasion on some of the concrete girders. Girder#9 of span#2 has an unsound concrete area at(1.5 feet X 2.5 feet)at mid-span. (110-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) Girder#9(easterly original girder)has one longitudinal crack at(0.05 inches wide, 2.0 feet long)at the bottom face; and 3.0 feet long longitudinal crack at 0.05 inches wide. Both cracks are at the midspan#1. SUBSTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V-H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (61) CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M (113) SCOUR 5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING OR PILE (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M SCOUR POA DATE N/A CHANNEL DESCRIPTION Natural earth trapezoidal. SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS a---CS 4 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 115 m 109 6 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 5 0 5 0 0 1190 Abrasion (PS Conc./RC) 2 1 0 1 0 0 (210) Pier Wall-RC Cracks and abrasion. (210-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The pier walls have the following locations with vertical cracks below: Pier wall#2 has two cracks about(0.05 inches wide)right below girder#6 and between girders#7 and#8. Pier wall#3 has only one crack about(0.05 inches wide) right below girder#6. Pier wall#4 has only one crack about(0.05 inches wide) right below girder#6. Pier wall#5 has one crack about(0.03 inches wide)right below girder#7 and one crack at(0.05 inches wide)between girders#5 and#6. (210-1190)Abrasion (PS Conc./RC) Pier wall#4 has a segregation area at(3.0 feet X 10.0 feet)at the southerly face approximately 2.0 feet above the ground level. 215 Abutment-RC 2 62 m 62 0 0 0 (215)Abutment-RC There were no significant defects noted. 225 Pile-Steel 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 City Council 23 — 53 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (225) Pile-Steel The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. 227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 (227) Pile-RC The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/26/2007 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Misc. Str Target ROUTINE EA Since the soffit is so bad , so I recommend that the city should core several samples from the concrete deck to determine how much is the chloride content in the concrete deck. Patch all the soffit spalls after cleaning the soffit rebars. JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/12/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Remove Vegetation Str Target ROUTINE EA Remove all debris, trash underneath of the structure due to transients who have been camping here. City Council 23 — 54 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 9 of 9 Y M N O N,� c V ° � t N 00 W � e e = e e e -. LO LO I M N e uu O 1 2 U �L e 0 \ O � U LO LO U O O � U N LO O LO Y M N O ' N + �. cV - , •- � CN CN N 00 LU r .t6-.., 46 . �� II co co 1 ® L ® V cz 7 � u _ 3. � o c ti o m � 0 o Lo_ U 0) 1 �co O OD� a) U-2 � � �. � Ua) o � . o m 0 5 U rn O s a)L D- :E � ƒ \ .. \ m � q t - ' . . N- � ° ° - 2 ` 00 X W . . . \ " � ■ '+. .. � . .. . ~ m . © q N u � » _ /} \ _ 0\ U) § \ \ & 2 2 > Y M N O N oV 1 N t O N 00 X LU ■ �1 00 LO I M N •w- m c Q c 1 u U . p O S - a •V Q C(6 0 °O � � U 1 0 LO 0 0o a ry U cri 0 U � o Q Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Mainte BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT 4r* _ EX_H�B�T2 Routine Inspectionaffim_w -- BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE: 55C0423 SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL February 8, 2023 BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION (9)LOCATION 0.2 MI E/O FAIRVIEW ST (7)FACILITY CARRIED 17TH STREET (11)POSTMILE 0 (6)FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL (16)LATITUDE 33°45'35.14" (5)INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000 (17)LONGITUDE 117'54'04.06" (104)ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION (58)DECK 7 GOOD DECK AREA(M)2 3,043 (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 93.9 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A (62)CULVERT N N/A(NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT(SD)STATUS NOT SD (67)STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION Routine-Roadway View(02/12/2019) Routine-Elevation View(02/12/2019) i Routine-Underside View(02/02/2021) TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo o QR13FESS/0,yq� REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo Edwin Mah INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah No. 27141 jO Exp. 03/31/2025 9/11/2023 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) Date tE `FD�P City Council 23 — 59 4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 55C0423/AAAL/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations STRUCTUREOVERVIEW AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION (1)STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069 (90)INSPECTION DATE 02/23(91)FREQUENCY 48 MO (2)HIGHWAY DISTRICT 12 (92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE (3)COUNTY CODE (55)ORANGE A)NSTM INSP N-NO MO A) N/A (4)PLACE CODE (69000)SANTA ANA B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A (21)MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI C)OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A (22)OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI (98)BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE N/A (99)BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (27) YEAR BUILT 1977 (45)MAIN SPANS 4 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 6: PRSTR CONC CONT (106)YEAR MODIFIED N/A (46)APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 02: STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM (34)SKEW 34 (48)MAX SPAN(M) 27.1 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (49)LENGTH (M) 109.1 (35)STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112)NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 2 NO.OF HINGES 0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Simply supported 4-span PC/PS concrete I-girder(13 each)with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles. SPAN CONFIGURATION (W)87.0 feet, 2 @ 89.0 feet, 87.0 feet(E). OPERATIONAL INF• ' • LOAD CAPACITY (31)DESIGN LOAD 0 UNKNOWN (65)CALC METHOD 8 LRFR RATING FACTOR (66)INVENTORY RATING RF= 1.61 (63)CALC METHOD 8 LRFR RATING FACTOR (64)OPERATING RATING RF= 2.22 (70)BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS (41)STRUCTURE STATUS A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING PPPPP OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches POSTING LOADS Safe Existing Posting Loads Ordinance/Order Signs Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons NONE Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Speed 40 N/A N/A MPH Additional Signs NONE Posting Date N/A Load Rating Summary Date 06/19/17 Load Rating Type Calculated Load Rating Tool-Date BrR 6.8.1 AASHTO-06/19/17 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53)MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54)MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M City Council 23 — 60 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge. The channel is dry. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. DECK AND ROADWAY There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks range from (up to 0.07 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing)throughout the entire bridge deck. Deck soffit has random transverse cracks at(0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long)with white and brown efflorescence in most bays of span 1 near pierwall 2 and in between spans 2 and 3. Both sidewalks have longitudinal cracks and numerous small spalls with exposed rebars along the bottom. Type B seal has no adhesion; and it has been deterioratiing at aboth of abutment joints with vegetation inside the joint gap at(2.0 to 3.0 inches gap at 75.0 degrees of Fahrenheit. SUPERSTRUCTURE PC/PS Girders have cracks and spalls as the following locations below: The southerly girder at the west end above the westerly abutment has a spall (16.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 6.0 inches D)with exposed rebar and rusted. Girder 3 has a small spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 27.0 feet from the westerly abutment. Span 2, girder 5 has a spall (24.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 5.0 inches D)with exposed rebars and strands with rusted at the bottom flange at midspan 2. Span 4, girder 2 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 42.0 feet from pier wall 4. Girder 11 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)about 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. In addition, girder 13 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)about 30.0 feet from pier wall 4 and (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)spall approximately 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. The southerly exterior girder has a spall (12.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 1.0 inches D)on top of southwest corner of the westerly abutment. Northerly, girder 2 has a spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)over the bike lane approximately 60.0 west of abutment 5. There are several girder webs covering with graffiti near the easterly abutment. SUBSTRUCTURE The following is the locations of cracks on pier walls below: Pier wall 2 has four vertical cracks 0.05 inches wide. Pier wall 3 has two vertical cracks 0.06 inches wide. Pier wall 4 has four vertical 0.06 inches wide cracks; and three 0.06 inches wide vertical cracks. North half of the westerly abutment and southerly half of the easterly abutment are occupied with transients. The westerly abutment has a large spall at(20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D)under the southerly girder, southwest corner. RECOMMENDATION Chaining deck and coring samples of this bridge are highly recommended due to the condition of bridge deck so that the local agency can determine the best solution of deck treatment with Methacrylate or Polyester Concrete Overlay. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 06/19/2017 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 06/19/2017. SPECIAL • N INFORMATION STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. UNDERMJA ERH TIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FQ13IN@JBRIDGE. 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations DECK AND ROADWAY DECK CROSS SECTION (N) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 78.0 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.0 foot br(S). DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION (49) LENGTH 109.1 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 24.3 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 28.0 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE&SUBRTE 000000000000 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 1-ROUTE ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 24.3 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 NO MEDIAN (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE 1-CONCRETE (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 24.3 M B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE 0-NONE (68) DECK GEOMETRY 5 ABOVE TOLERABLE C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE (72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT OVERLAY THICKNESS(inches) 0 inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 33000 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (30) YEAR OF ADT 2021 (109) TRUCK ADT% 1 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (28a) LANES 6 (114) FUTURE ADT 70777 SPEED 40 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 12 Deck-RC 2 3054 sq.m 2704 200 150 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 350 0 200 150 0 (12-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks range from (0.04 to 0.07 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing) throughout the entire deck. Deck soffit has random transverse cracks at(0.04 inches wide)with white and brown efflorescence in most bays of span 1 near pierwall 2 and in between spans 2 and 3. JOINT APPROACH RAIL RAIL INFORMATION (36a)Rail Code 1 (36b)Transition 0 (36c)Appr Guardrail 0 (36d)Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 40 MPH JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 302 Joint-Compression Seal 2 66 m 36 25 5 0 2320 Seal Adhesion (Joints) 2 30 0 25 5 0 (302-2320)Seal Adhesion (Joints) Type B seal has no adhesion; and it has been deterioratiing at aboth of abutment joints with vegetation inside the joint gap at(2.0 to 3.0 inches gap at 75.0 degrees of Fahrenheit. 333 Railing-Other 2 220 m 190 30 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 30 0 30 0 0 City Council 23 — 62 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations JOINT - APPROACH RAIL JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (333-1080)Delamination/Spall/Patched Area Both sidewalks have longitudinal cracks and numerous small spalls (1.0 to 2.0 inches round)with exposed rebars along the bottom. SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 109 Girder/Beam-PS Cone. 2 1419 m 1399 15 5 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 20 0 15 5 0 (109-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area PC/PS Girders have cracks and spalls as the following locations below: The southerly girder at the west end above the westerly abutment has a spall (16.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 6.0 inches D)with exposed rebar and rusted. Girder 3 has a small spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 27.0 feet from the westerly abutment. Span 2, girder 5 has a spall (24.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 5.0 inches D)with exposed rebars and strands with rusted at the bottom flange at midspan 2. Span 4, girder 2 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 42.0 feet from pier wall 4. Girder 11 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)about 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. In addition, girder 13 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)about 30.0 feet from pier wall 4 and (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)spall approximately 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. The southerly exterior girder has a spall (12.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 1.0 inches D)on top of southwest corner of the westerly abutment. Northerly,girder 2 has a spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)over the bike lane approximately 60.0 west of abutment 5. 312 Bearing-Enclosed 2 2 each 2 0 0 0 (312)Bearing-Enclosed There were no significant defects noted. SUBSTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V-H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (61) CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M (113) SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M SCOUR POA DATE N/A CHANNEL DESCRIPTION RC trapezoidal. SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 84 m 78 4 2 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 6 0 4 2 0 (210-1 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM I55C0423/AAAL/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (210-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The following is the locations of cracks on pier walls below: Pier wall 2 has four vertical cracks 0.05 inches wide. Pier wall 3 has two vertical cracks 0.06 inches wide. Pier wall 4 has four vertical 0.06 inches wide cracks; and three 0.06 inches wide vertical cracks. 215 Abutment-RC 2 56 m 54 0 2 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 2 0 0 2 0 (215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area The westerly abutment has a large spall at(20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D)under the southerly girder, southwest corner. 226 Pile-PS Conc. 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 (226) Pile-PS Conc. The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. 256 Slope Protection 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 (256)Slope Protection There were no significant defects noted. City Council 23 — 64 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 6 of 7 55C0423/AAAL/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations WORK RECOMMENDATIONS DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/12/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Methacrylate Str Target ROUTINE EA Chaining deck and coring deck samples are highly recommended prior to seal deck cracks with Methacrylate throughout the entire deck. JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/12/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Joints-Replace Str Target ROUTINE EA Replace all the existing type B seal. SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/01/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Super-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Patch all concrete spalls as the following locations below. Some of the spall areas have been mentioned in the previous work recommendations in previous years. The southerly girder at the west end above the westerly abutment has a spall (16.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 6.0 inches D)with exposed rebar and rusted. Girder 3 has a small spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 27.0 feet from the westerly abutment. Span 2, girder 5 has a spall (24.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 5.0 inches D)with exposed rebars and strands with rusted at the bottom flange at midspan 2. Span 4, girder 2 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 42.0 feet from pier wall 4. Girder 11 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)about 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. In addition, girder 13 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)about 30.0 feet from pier wall 4 and (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)spall approximately 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. The southerly exterior girder has a spall (12.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 1.0 inches D)on top of southwest corner of the westerly abutment. Northerly, girder 2 has a spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)over the bike lane approximately 60.0 west of abutment 5. Rec Date 04/26/2011 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Super-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Clean all rebars and patch the spall at girder 5 in span 2 and others SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/01/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Sub-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Sawcut, remove and clean all loose material; and then, patch it with cement mortar concrete as the following location below (this work recommendation has been made in 2007). The westerly abutment has a large spall at (20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) under the southerly girder, southwest corner. Rec Date 02/18/2015 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Sub-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Clean rebars and patch the spall 20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 12.0 inches D at the westerly abutment. Rec Date 02/27/2007 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Sub-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Patch the west abutment that has a large spall (20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) under the southerly girder. OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE City Council 23 - 65 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829 EXHIBIT 2 California Department of Transportation Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance and Investigations BRIDGE NSPECTION CORDS NFORMATION SYSTEM The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS. These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual. Records for "Confidential" bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. City Council 23 — 66 8/4/2026 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Mainte BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT 4r* _ EX_H�B�T2 Routine Inspectionaffim_w -- BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE: 55C0115 SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL February 7, 2023 BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION (9)LOCATION 0.3 MI S/O MEMORY LANE (7)FACILITY CARRIED BRISTOL ST (11)POSTMILE 0 (6)FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL (16)LATITUDE 33°46'09.87" (5)INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000 (17)LONGITUDE 117°53'04.89" (104)ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION (58)DECK 5 FAIR DECK AREA(M)2 944 (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 90.1 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION 100 (62)CULVERT N N/A(NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT(SD)STATUS NOT SD (67)STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING OR PIL PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION Ave— Routine-Roadway View(02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View(02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View(02/26/2015) TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo o QR13FESS/0,yq� REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo Edwin Mah INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah No. 27141 jO Exp. 03/31/2025 9/11/2023 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) Date tE `FD�P City Council 23 — 67 4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations STRUCTURE OVERVIEW AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION (1)STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069 (90)INSPECTION DATE 02/23(91)FREQUENCY 24 MO (2)HIGHWAY DISTRICT 12 (92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE (3)COUNTY CODE (55)ORANGE A)NSTM INSP N-NO MO A) N/A (4)PLACE CODE (69000)SANTA ANA B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A (21)MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI C)OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A (22)OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI (98)BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE N/A (99)BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (27) YEAR BUILT 1947 (45)MAIN SPANS 3 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 3: STEEL (106)YEAR MODIFIED 2003 (46)APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 02: STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM (34)SKEW 5 (48)MAX SPAN(M) 15.1 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (49)LENGTH (M) 31.1 (35)STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112)NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 4 NO.OF HINGES 0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Simply supported 3-span steel girders(7 each at span 2&and 6 each at spans 1 and 3)with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments,foundation type unknown. West widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete 1-girders(5 each)with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles. East widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (3 each)with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments with monolithic wingwalls, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles. SPAN CONFIGURATION (S)22.75 feet, 52.10 feet,22.75 feet(N). OPERATIONAL I LOAD CAPACITY (31)DESIGN LOAD 2 M 13.5(H 15) (65)CALC METHOD 8 LRFR RATING FACTOR (66)INVENTORY RATING RF= 0.91 (63)CALC METHOD 8 LRFR RATING FACTOR (64)OPERATING RATING RF= 1.18 (70)BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS (41)STRUCTURE STATUS A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING PPPPP OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches POSTING LOADS Safe Existing Posting Loads Ordinance/Order Signs Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons NONE Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Speed 45 N/A N/A MPH Additional Signs NONE Posting Date N/A Load Rating Summary Date 09/08/16 Load Rating Type Calculated Load Rating Tool-Date BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO-09/08/16 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53)MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54)MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M City Council 23 — 68 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge. There is no need for special equipment to inspect this structure. The channel is dry. REVISIONS The entire quantity of RC abutments ELI 215 is modified from 203.0 to 262.0 feet because the wingwalls are monolithic with the abutments. DECK AND ROADWAY AC roadway is at both approach and departure lanes. Polyester Concrete Overlay was only done on lane 1 of each direction for areas of the original bridge deck and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide and 100.0 feet long with Methacrylate treatment. The widening bridge deck has longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.05 inches and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long wide throughout the entire bridge deck. There are transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with heavy white and brown efflorescence inside the original bays 6 to 9 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9). Type A pourable seal has been deteriorating and losing all its adhesion. SUPERSTRUCTURE Only the bottom and the top flanges of all steel girders were painted in between span 2; and the painting system of superstructure is in fair condition but the webs need to be painted. About 50.0%of the restrainer cables are rusted. SUBSTRUCTURE The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at(12.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W)at the top of bay 3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6). The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide and 4.0 to 10.0 feet long (see the attached photo no. 5). Along all the footing of pier walls are placed and protected with rocks, boulders(riprap). SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 09/08/2016 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 09/08/2016. SPECIAL • N INFORMATION STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. City Council 23 — 69 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 3 of 6 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations DECK AND ROADWAY DECK CROSS SECTION (W) 1.00 foot br, 7.00 feet sw, 72.00 feet, 7.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br(E). DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION (49) LENGTH 31.1 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 25.7 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 30.5 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE&SUBRTE 000000000000 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 2.1 M RIGHT 2.1 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 1-ROUTE ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 25.7 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 NO MEDIAN (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE 1-CONCRETE (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 25.7 M B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE 0-NONE (68) DECK GEOMETRY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE CRIT C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE (72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT OVERLAY THICKNESS(inches) 0 inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 55000 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (30) YEAR OF ADT 2021 (109) TRUCK ADT% 1 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (28a) LANES 4 (114) FUTURE ADT 81501 SPEED 45 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=5 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 12 Deck-RC 2 948 sq.m 723 150 75 0 1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining 2 150 0 100 50 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 75 0 50 25 0 521 Concrete Coat.(Meth/Sealer) 2 426 sq.m 426 0 0 0 (12-1120)Efflorescence/Rust Staining There are transverse hairline cracks up to 0.04 inches wide with light to heavy white; and brown efflorescence inside the original bays #6 to#9 of all spans(see the attached photo no. 9). (12-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The widening deck has random longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.06 inches wide throughout the entire bridge deck. (12-521)Concrete Coat.(Meth/Sealer) The Asphalt Slurry was placed over an area of the original bridge deck(two lanes#1 of each bound traffic and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide, 100.0 feet Ion with Methacrylate treatment. JOINT APPROACH . RAIL INFORMATION (36a)Rail Code 1 (36b)Transition 0 (36c)Appr Guardrail 0 (36d)Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 45 MPH JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 301 Joint-Pourable Seal 2 86 m 31 25 30 0 2320 Seal Adhesion (Joints) 2 25 0 25 0 0 2330 Seal Damage(Joints) 2 30 0 0 30 0 City Council 23 — 70 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations JOINT - APPROACH RAIL JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (301)Joint-Pourable Seal The pourable joint seals are located only at lane#2 from each direction (widening portion only)and they are deteriorated and cracked throughout. (301-2320)Seal Adhesion (Joints) The pourable joint seals are partially failed and lost adhesion, debris was noticed inside the joint. (301-2330)Seal Damage(Joints) The seal of the joints are failed in many locations. 331 Railing-RC 2 60 m 60 0 0 0 (331)Railing-RC There were no significant defects noted. SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 107 Girder/Beam-Steel 2 201 m 201 0 0 0 515 Steel Coating-Paint 2 150 sq.m 150 0 0 0 (107)Girder/Beam-Steel There were no significant defects noted. (107-515)Steel Coating-Paint Only the bottom flange and the top flange of all steel girders were painted in between span#2. The paint system of the girders is in fair condition. 109 Girder/Beam-PS Conc. 2 240 m 240 0 0 0 (109)Girder/Beam-PS Conc. There were no significant defects noted. 182 EQ Restrainer Cable-Other 2 4 ea. 3 1 0 0 1000 Corrosion 2 2 1 1 0 0 (182)EQ Restrainer Cable-Other Minor corrosion. (182-1000)Corrosion About 50.0 percent of the restrainer cables are rusted. 312 Bearing-Enclosed 2 4 each 4 0 0 0 (312)Bearing-Enclosed This element is included to indicate the presence of bearings on this structure. The bearings were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of bearing distress was noted in any superstructure element. SUBSTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V-H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (61) CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M (113) SCOUR 5 STABLE WIN FOOTING OR PILE (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M SCOUR POA DATE N/A CHANNEL DESCRIPTION Natural earth trapezoidal with rock slopes through the site. City Council 23 — 71 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 62 m 62 0 0 0 (210) Pier Wall-RC There were no significant defects noted. 215 Abutment-RC 2 80 m 77 1 2 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 0 1 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 2 0 1 1 0 (215)Abutment-RC Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity. It has a spall, cracks. (215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at(12.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W)at the top of bay#3(counting from east, see the attached photo no.6). (215-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide(see the attached photo no. 5). 220 Pile Cap/Footing-RC 2 20 m 20 0 0 0 (220) Pile Cap/Footing-RC There were no significant defects noted. 226 Pile-PS Conc. 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 (226) Pile-PS Conc. The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/20/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Methacrylate Str Target ROUTINE EA Seal deck cracks with Methacrylate only widening section on both directions(approximately 70.0%of bridge deck need to be sealed) . JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/01/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Appr. Roadway-Repair Str Target ROUTINE EA Repave AC roadway at the approach and departure lanes due to settlement behind abutment locations. Rec Date 02/20/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Joints-Replace Str Target ROUTINE EA Replace all Type A seal at all locations on bridge deck. SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/01/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Paint Misc. Activity Str Target ROUTINE EA Full preparation to paint all steel girder webs those have been left out. In addition, remove and clean all rust from the EQ Restrainer Cables before paint them. City Council 23 — 72 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 6 of 6 Page 1 of 6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Number 55CO115EXHIBIT 2 Structure Maintenance & Investigations Facility Carried: BRISTOL ST AW Location ; 0.3 MI S/O MEMORY LANE City ; SANTA ANA Inspection Date 02/01/2021 Inspection Type Bridge Inspection Report Routine FC Underwater Special Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ STRUCTURE NAME: SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION Year Built : 1947 Skew (degrees) : 5 Year Modified: 2003 No. of Joints 4 Length (m) : 31.1 No. of Hinges 0 Structure Descripticn: Simply supported 3-span steel girders (7 each at span 2 & and 6 each at spans 1 and 3) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, foundation type unknown. West widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (5 each) with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles. East widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (3 each) with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments with monolithic wingwalls, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles. Span Configuration : (S) 22.75 feet, 52.10 feet, 22.75 feet (N) . SAFE LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS Design Live Load: M-13.5 OR H-15 Inventory Rating: RF= 0.91 Calculation Method: (LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING Operating Rating: RF- 1.18 Calculation Method: (LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING Permit Rating PPPPP Posting Load Type 3: Legal Type 3S2: Legal Type 3-3:Legal DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE Deck X-Section: (W) 1.00 foot br, 7.00 feet sw, 72.00 feet, 7.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br (E) . Total Width: 30.5 m Net Width: 25.7 m No. of Lanes: 4 Speed: 45 mph Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired Overlay Thickness: 0.0 inches Rail Code: 1000 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE Channel Description: Natural earth trapezoidal with rock slopes through the site. NOTICE The bridge inspection condition assessment used for this inspection is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Bridge Element Inspection Manual 2013 as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal law. The new element inspection methodology may result in changes to related condition and appraisal ratings on the bridge without significant physical changes at the bridge. The element condition information contained in this report represents the current condition of the bridge based on the most recent routine and special inspections. Some of the notes presented below may be from an inspection that occurred prior to the date noted in this report. Refer to the Scope and Access section of this inspection report for a description of which portions of the bridge were inspected on this date. INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by P ' City Council 23 — 73 8/4/2026 Page 2 of 6 INSPECTION COMMENTARY EXHIBIT 2 walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. The channel is dry at the time of inspsection. REVISIONS The entire quantity of RC abutments ELI K 15 is modified from 203.0 feet to 262.0 feet because the wingwalls are monolithic with the abutments. DECK AND ROADWAY AC roadway is at both approach and departure lanes. Polyester Concrete Overlay was only done on lanes 1 of each direction for areas of the original bridge deck and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide, 100.0 feet long with Methacrylate treatment. The widening bridge deck has longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.05 inches wide throughout the entire bridge deck. There are transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with heavy white and brown efflorescence inside the original bays 6 to 9 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9) . Type A pourable seal has been deteriorating and losing all its adhesion. SUPERSTRUCTURE Only the bottom and the top flanges of all steel girders were painted in between span 2; and the painting system of superstructure is in fair condition but the webs need to be painted. About 50.0 percent of the restrainer cables are rusted. SUBSTRUCTURE The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at (12.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W) at the top of bay 3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6) . The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide (see the attached photo no. 5) . Along all the footing of pier walls are placed and protected with rocks, boulders / riprap. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 09/08/2016 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 09/08/2016. P City Council 23 — 74 8/4/2026 Page 3 of 6 ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY EXHIBIT 2 Elem Defect Defect Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. /Prot Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 12 Deck-RC 2 948 sq.m 723 150 75 0 1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining 2 150 0 100 50 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 75 0 50 25 0 521 Concrete Coat. (Meth/Paint/Seal) 2 426 sq.m 426 0 0 0 (12-1120) There are transverse hairline cracks up to 0.04 inches wide with light to heavy white; and brown efflorescence inside the original bays #6 to 49 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9) . (12-1130) The widening deck has random longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.06 inches wide throughout the entire bridge deck. (12-521) The Asphalt Slurry was placed over an area of the original bridge deck (two lanes #1 of each bound traffic and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide, 100.0 feet long) with Methacrylate treatment. 107 Girder/Beam-Steel 2 201 m 201 0 0 0 515 Steel Coating-Paint 2 150 sq.m 150 0 0 0 (107) There were no significant defects noted. (107-515) Only the bottom flange and the top flange of all steel girders were painted in between span #2. The paint system of the girders is in fair condition. 109 Girder/Beam-PS Conc. 2 240 m 240 0 0 0 (109) There were no significant defects noted. 182 EQ Restrainer Cable-Other 2 4 ea. 3 1 0 0 1000 Corrosion 2 2 1 1 0 0 (182) Minor corrosion. (182-1000) About 50.0 percent of the restrainer cables are rusted. 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 62 m 62 0 0 0 (210) There were no significant defects noted. 215 Abutment-RC 2 80 m 77 1 2 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 0 1 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 2 0 1 1 0 (215) Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity. It has a spall, cracks. (215-1080) The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at (12.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W) at the top of bay #3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6) . (215-1130) P City Council 23 — 75 8/4/2026 Page 4 of 6 ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY EXHIBIT 2 Elem Defect Defect Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. /Prot Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide (see the attached photo no. 5) . 220 Pile Cap/Footing-RC 2 20 m 20 0 0 0 (220) There were no significant defects noted. 226 Pile-PS Conc. 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 (226) The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. 301 Joint-Pourable Seal 2 86 In 31 25 30 0 2320 Seal Adhesion (Joints) 2 25 0 25 0 0 2330 Seal Damage (Joints) 2 30 0 0 30 0 (301) The pourable joint seals are located only at lane #2 from each direction (widening portion only) and they are deteriorated and cracked throughout. (301-2320) The pourable joint seals are partially failed and lost adhesion, debris was noticed inside the joint. (301-2330) The seal of the joints are failed in many locations. 312 Bearing-Enclosed 2 4 each 4 0 0 0 (312) This element is included to indicate the presence of bearings on this structure. The bearings were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of bearing distress was noted in any superstructure element. 331 Railing-RC 2 60 In 60 0 0 0 (331) There were no significant defects noted. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS RecDate: 02/01/2021 EstCost: Repave AC roadway at the approach and Action : Appr. Roadway-Repair StrTarget: 2 YEARS departure lanes due to settlement behind Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: abutment locations. Status : PROPOSED EA: RecDate: 02/01/2021 EstCost: Full preparation to paint all steel Action : Paint Misc. Activity StrTarget: 2 YEARS girder webs those have been left out. In Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: addition, remove and clean all rust from Status : PROPOSED EA: the EQ Restrainer Cables before paint them. RecDate: 02/20/2019 EstCost: Seal deck cracks with Methacrylate only Action : Deck-Methacrylate StrTarget: 2 YEARS widening section on both directions Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: (approximately 70.09 of bridge deck need Status : PROPOSED EA: to be sealed) P City Council 23 — 76 8/4/2026 Page 5 of 6 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBIT 2 RecDate: 02/20/2019 EstCost: Replace all Type A seal at all locations Action : Joints-Replace StrTarget: 2 YEARS on bridge deck. Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: Status : PROPOSED EA: CHANNEL X-SECTION Side : Upstream X-Section Date: 02/01/2021 Measured From :Top of deck Location Horiz (m) Vert(m) Comments Abutment 1 (South) 0.00 2.45 Face of abutment 1 6.50 4.90 Northerly face of pier 2 14.00 4.95 Span 2, thalweg 21.50 4.90 Southerly face of pier 3 43.50 2.90 Face of abutment 4 Team Leader Nelson N. Vo QROfESSiO,yq Report Author Nelson N. Vo c`� �Q Edwin y Inspected By NN.Vo/E.Mah c; Mah G7 r^ No. 27141 �D 03/31/2021 3/19/2021 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date) lF Of CPV1F0 P City Council 23 — 77 8/4/2026 Page 6 of 6 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT EXHIBIT 2 **++++++++++++++ IDENTIFICATION +++++**++++++++ *****+++++++**++++++++++++++++++++++++****+++++ SUFFICIENCY RATING = 90.1 (1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA 069 (8) STRUCTURE NUMBER 55C0115 PAINT CONDITION INDEX 100.0 = (5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)- ON 150000000 (2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT 12 (3) COUNTY CODE 059 (4) PLACE CODE 69000 ************* CLASSIFICATION ************* CODE (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED- SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL (112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- YES Y (7) FACILITY CARRIED- BRISTOL ST (104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- ROUTE ON NHS 1 (9) LOCATION- 0.3 MI S/O MEMORY LANE (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- OTHER PRIN ART URBAN 14 (11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT 0 (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- NOT STRAHNET 0 (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- PART OF NET 1 (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- NONE EXISTS N (13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE 000000000000 (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2 WAY 2 (16) LATITUDE 33 DEG 46 MIN 09.87 SEC (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE- (17) LONGITUDE 117 DEG 53 MIN 04.89 SEC (105) FED.LANDS HWY- NOT APPLICABLE 0 (98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE o SHARE (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - NOT ON NET 0 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER (20) TOLL- ON FREE ROAD 3 (21) MAINTAIN- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 ******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL ********* (22) OWNER- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL- STEEL (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- NOT ELIGIBLE 5 TYPE- STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR GDP CODE 302 (44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL- OTHER/NA **************** CONDITION **************** CODE TYPE- OTHER/NA CODE 000 (58) DECK 5 (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 3 (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0 (60) SUBSTRUCTURE 7 (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- CIP CONCRETE CODE 1 (61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 (108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM: (62) CULVERTS N A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- CONCRETE CODE 1 ********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- NONE CODE 0 (31) DESIGN LOAD- M-13.5 OR H-15 2 C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- NONE CODE 0 (63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- (LRFR) LD & RES FA 8 *************** AGE AND SERVICE *************** (64) OPERATING RATING- RF= 1.18 (27) YEAR BUILT 1947 (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- (LRFR) LD & RES FP 8 (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 2003 (66) INVENTORY RATING- RF= 0.91 (42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN 5 (70) BRIDGE POSTING- EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS 5 UNDER- WATERWAY 5 (41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A (28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 04 UNDER STRUCTURE 00 (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 55000 DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION (30) YEAR OF ADT 2021 (109) TRUCK ADT 1 **************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 7 *************** GEOMETRIC DATA **************** (68) DECK GEOMETRY 9 (48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 15.1 M (69) UNDERCLEARAHCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL H (49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 31.1 M (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 2.1 M RIGHT 2.1 M (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 8 (51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 25.7 M (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1000 (52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 30.5 M (113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES 5 (32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 25.7 l] ********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ********** (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- NO MEDIAN 0 (75) TYPE OF WORK- CODE (34) SKEW 5 DEG (35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO (76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT M (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 TI (94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 25.7 M (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M (96) TOTAL PROJECT COST (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- NOT H/RR 0.00 l9 (97) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- NOT H/RR 0.0 M (114) FUTURE ADT 81501 (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR IT 0.0 M (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 *************** NAVIGATION DATA *************** *************** INSPECTIONS *************** (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- NOT APPLICABLE CODE N (90) INSPECTION DATE 02/21 (91) FREQUENCY 24 NO (111) PIER PROTECTION- CODE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE (92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE 0.0 M A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B) (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C) P City Council 23 — 78 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 California Department of Transportation Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance and Investigations BRIDGE NSPECTION CORDS NFORMATION SYSTEM The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS. These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual. Records for "Confidential" bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. City Council 23 — 79 8/4/2026 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Mainte BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT A* ExHiBiT2 Routine Inspectionawwww -- BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE: 55C0372 SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL February 8, 2023 BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION (9)LOCATION 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD (7)FACILITY CARRIED 5TH STREET (11)POSTMILE 0 (6)FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL (16)LATITUDE 33°44'55.78" (5)INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000 (17)LONGITUDE 117°54'34.27" (104)ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION (58)DECK 7 GOOD DECK AREA(M)2 1,901 (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 41.0 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A (62)CULVERT N N/A(NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT(SD)STATUS NOT SD (67)STRUCTURE EVALUATION 2 INTOLERABLE- REPLACE (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION I Routine-Roadway View(02/12/2019) Routine-Elevation View(02/12/2019) f . L. Routine-Underside View(02/12/2019) TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo o QR13FESS/0,yq� REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo Edwin Mah INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah No. 27141 jO Exp. 03/31/2025 9/11/2023 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) Date tE `FD�P City Council 23 — 80 4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations STRUCTUREOVERVIEW AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION (1)STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069 (90)INSPECTION DATE 02/23(91)FREQUENCY 24 MO (2)HIGHWAY DISTRICT 12 (92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE (3)COUNTY CODE (55)ORANGE A)NSTM INSP N-NO MO A) N/A (4)PLACE CODE (69000)SANTA ANA B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A (21)MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI C)OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A (22)OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI (98)BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE N/A (99)BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (27) YEAR BUILT 1962 (45)MAIN SPANS 7 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT (106)YEAR MODIFIED 2010 (46)APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04:TEE BEAM (34)SKEW 26 (48)MAX SPAN(M) 14.9 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (49)LENGTH (M) 97.5 (35)STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112)NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 3 NO.OF HINGES 2 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder(8 each)with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles. Widening: South and north overhangs were widenined. SPAN CONFIGURATION (W)36.0 feet, 5 @ 48.9 feet, 36.0 feet(E). OPERATIONAL INF• ' • LOAD CAPACITY (31)DESIGN LOAD 5 MS 18(HS 20) (65)CALC METHOD 8 LRFR RATING FACTOR (66)INVENTORY RATING RF= 0.31 (63)CALC METHOD 8 LRFR RATING FACTOR (64)OPERATING RATING RF= 0.47 (70)BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS (41)STRUCTURE STATUS A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING XXXXX OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches POSTING LOADS Safe Existing Posting Loads Ordinance/Order Signs Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons NONE Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Speed 35 N/A N/A MPH Additional Signs NONE Posting Date N/A Load Rating Summary Date 09/30/22 Load Rating Type Calculated Load Rating Tool-Date BrR 7.2.0 AASHTO-09/13/22 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53)MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54)MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M City Council 23 — 81 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge. The channel is dry. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. Rain boots maybe needed if it is in raining season. REVISIONS The inspection frequency was modified from 24 months to 48 months. DECK AND ROADWAY Polyester Deck Overlay is in good condition. There are random transverse soffit cracks with white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans 1, 2, 6 and 7. AC Roadway started deteriorating at both of approach and departure lanes mainly along the edge of travel way. Both abutment joints were filled partially with debris and sand. Both sidewalks have map cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 8.0 inches in spacing. SUPERSTRUCTURE Northerly girder of span 7 has a small spall at(2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)at 10.0 feet from the easterly abutment. SUBSTRUCTURE Pier wall 3 has two spalls at(20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder,westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at(15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet)at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face. The following is the locations of pier wall 5 with cracks and spalls: There is a spall at(18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D)at the south end. There are an unsound concrete area at(8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W)under the northerly girder; and the other area is about(8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W)under the northerly girder right above the footing cap. Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide and 5.0 feet long. Pierwall 3 has a vertical crack 0.05 wide and 6.0 feet long at the northerly end. Pier wall 4 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide and 6.0 feet long. Pier wall 6 has a spall at(18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D)at the southerly end. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/06/2013 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/06/2013. SPECIAL • N INFORMATIO STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. City Council 23 — 82 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations DECK AND ROADWAY DECK CROSS SECTION (N) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 51.8 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.0 foot br(S). DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION (49) LENGTH 97.5 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 15.8 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 19.5 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE&SUBRTE (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 0.8 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 19.2 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 NO MEDIAN (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE 1-CONCRETE (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 15.8 M B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE 0-NONE (68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 TOLERABLE C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE (72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA OVERLAY THICKNESS(inches) 0 inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 13000 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (30) YEAR OF ADT 2023 (109) TRUCK ADT% 1 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (28a) LANES 4 (114) FUTURE ADT 27788 SPEED 35 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 16 Top Flange-RC 2 1710 sq.m 1610 100 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 100 0 100 0 0 511 Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete 2 1540 sq.m 1540 0 0 0 (16-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) There are random transverse soffit cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 10.0 to 14.0 inches long with white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans 1, 2, 6 and 7. (16-511)Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete There were no significant defects noted. JOINT • ' • RAIL INFORMATION (36a)Rail Code 1 (36b)Transition 0 (36c)Appr Guardrail 0 (36d)Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 35 MPH JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 301 Joint-Pourable Seal 2 44 m 34 10 0 0 2350 Debris Impaction (Joints) 2 10 0 10 0 0 (301-2350)Debris Impaction (Joints) Both abutment hinge joint locations were filled partially with debris and sand. 304 Joint-Open Expansion 2 98 m 98 0 0 0 (304)Joint-Open Expansion There were no sianificant defects noted. City Council 23 — 83 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations JOINT - APPROACH RAIL JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 331 Railing-RC 2 196 m 191 5 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 5 0 5 0 0 (331-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) There are several vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long inside of both rails. SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 780 m 779 1 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 1 0 0 (110-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area Northerly girder of span 7 has a small spall at(2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D)at 10.0 feet from the easterly abutment. 182 EQ Restrainer Cable-Other 2 16 ea. 16 0 0 0 (182)EQ Restrainer Cable-Other There were no significant defects noted. 312 Bearing-Enclosed 2 4 each 4 0 0 0 (312)Bearing-Enclosed There were no significant defects noted. SUBSTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V-H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (61) CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 NO DEFICIENCIES (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M (113) SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M SCOUR POA DATE N/A CHANNEL DESCRIPTION Concrete lined trapezoidal with bike/maintenance path under end spans. SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 117 m 109 4 4 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 4 0 0 4 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 4 0 4 0 0 (210-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area Pierwall 3 has two spalls at(20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D)under the northerly girder,westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at(15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet)at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face. The following is the locations of pier wall 5 with cracks and spalls: There is a spall at(18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D)at the south end. There are an unsound concrete area at(8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the of Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 5 of 6 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (210-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area Pier wall 6 has a spall at(18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D)at the southerly end. (210-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide. Pierwall 3 has a vertical crack 0.05 wide at the northerly end. Pier wall 4 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide. 215 Abutment-RC 2 39 m 39 0 0 0 (215)Abutment-RC There were no significant defects noted. 227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 (227) Pile-RC The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. 256 Slope Protection 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 (256)Slope Protection There were no significant defects noted. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/13/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Sub-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Sawcut, remove all loose material around the areas before patching all the concrete spalls as following locations below: Pier wall 3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face. There is a spall at(18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D)at the south end. There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about(8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap. OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE City Council 23 — 85 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 6 of 6 55C0372/AAAK/102829 EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 6 AW DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Number : 55C0372 Structure Maintenance & Investigations Facility Carried: 5TH STREET Location 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD 4wbtww City : SANTA ANA Inspection Date 02/13/2019 Inspection Type Bridge Inspection Report Routine FC Underwater Special Other 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ STRUCTURE NAME: SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION Year Built : 1962 Skew (degrees) : 26 Year Modified: 2010 No. of Joints 3 Length (m) : 97.5 No. of Hinges 2 Structure Description: Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (8 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles. Widening: South and north overhangs were widenined. Span Configuration : (W) 36.0 feet, 5 @ 48.9 feet, 36.0 feet (E) . SAFE LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS Design Live Load: MS-18 OR HS-20 Inventory Rating: RF=1.17 =>37.9 metric tons Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Operating Rating: RF=1.94 =>62.9 metric tons Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Permit Rating PPPPP Posting Load Type 3: Legal Type 3S2:Legal Type 3-3:Legal DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE Deck X-Section: (N) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 51.8 feet, 5.0 feet sw, I.0 foot br (S) Total Width: 19.5 m Net Width: 15.8 m No. of Lanes: 4 Speed: 35 mph Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired Overlay Thickness: 0.0 inches Rail Code: 1000 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE Channel Description: Concrete lined trapezoidal with bike/maintenance path under end spans. NOTICE The bridge inspection condition assessment used for this inspection is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Bridge Element Inspection Manual 2013 as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal law. The new element inspection methodology may result in changes to related condition and appraisal ratings on the bridge without significant physical changes at the bridge. The element condition information contained in this report represents the current condition of the bridge based on the most recent routine and special inspections. Some of the notes presented below may be from an inspection that occurred prior to the date noted in this report. Refer to the Scope and Access section of this inspection report for a description of which portions of the bridge were inspected on this date. INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge. There is a shallow water only at midspan at the time of inspection. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. Rain boots maybe needed if it is in raining season. Printed on: Friday 09/20/2019 05:44 PM 55C0372/AAAJ/50096 City Council 23 — 86 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 2 of 6 INSPECTION COMMENTARY REVISIONS The inspection frequency was modified from 24 months to 48 months. DECK AND ROADWAY Polyester Deck Overlay is in good condition. There are random transverse soffit cracks with white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans #1, #2, #6 and #7. AC Roadway started deteriorating at both of approach and departure lanes mainly along the edge of travel way. Both abutment joints were filled partially with debris and sand. Both sidewalks have map cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 8.0 inches in spacing. SUPERSTRUCTURE Northerly girder of span #7 has a small spall at (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) at 10.0 feet from the easterly abutment. SUBSTRUCTURE Pier wall #3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face. The following is the locations of pier wall #5 with cracks and spalls: There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south end. There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap. Pier wall #2 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide. Pierwall #3 has a vertical crack 0.05 wide at the northerly end. Pier wall #4 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide. Pier wall #6 has a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the southerly end. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/06/2013 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/06/2013. Printed on: Friday 09/20/2019 05:44 PM 55C0372/AAAJ/50096 City Council 23 — 87 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 3 of 6 F SPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY ct Defect Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State t Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 16 Top Flange-RC 2 1710 sq.m 1510 200 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 200 0 200 0 0 511 Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete 2 1540 sq.m 1540 0 0 0 (16) Soffit cracks. (16-1130) There are random transverse soffit cracks with white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans #1, #2, #6 and #7. (16-511) There were no significant defects noted. 110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 780 m 779 1 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 1 0 0 (110) Spalls. (110-1080) Northerly girder of span #7 has a small spall at (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) at 10.0 feet from the easterly abutment. 182 EQ Restrainer Cable-Other 2 16 ea. 16 0 0 0 (182) There were no significant defects noted. 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 117 m 114 2 1 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 2 0 1 1 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 1 0 1 0 0 (210) Cracks and delamination. (210-1080) Pierwall #3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face. The following is the locations of pier wall #5 with cracks and spalls: There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south end. There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap. Pier wall #6 has a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the southerly end. (210-1130) Pier wall #2 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide. Pierwall #3 has a vertical crack 0.05 wide at the northerly end. Pier wall #4 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide. 215 Abutment-RC 2 39 m 39 0 0 0 Printed on: Friday 09/20/2019 05:44 PM 55C0372/AAAJ/50096 City Council 23 — 88 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 4 of 6 ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY Elem Defect Defect Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. /Prot Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 (215) There were no significant defects noted. 227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 (227) The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. 256 Slope Protection 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 (256) There were no significant defects noted. 301 Joint-Pourable Seal 2 44 m 34 10 0 0 2350 Debris Impaction (Joints) 2 10 0 10 0 0 (301) Debris inside the gap at both abutment joints and hinges. (301-2350) Both abutment joints were filled partially with debris and sand. 304 Joint-Open Expansion 2 98 m 98 0 0 0 (304) There were no significant defects noted. 312 Bearing-Enclosed 2 4 each 4 0 0 0 (312) There were no significant defects noted. 331 Railing-RC 2 196 m 191 5 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 5 0 5 0 0 (331) Minor hairline cracks. (331-1130) There are several vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide inside of both rails. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS RecDate: 02/13/2019 EstCost: Sawcut, remove all loose material around Action : Sub-Patch spalls StrTarget: 2 YEARS the areas before patching all the Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: concrete spalls as following locations Status : PROPOSED EA: below: Pier wall #3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face. There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south Printed on: Friday 09/20/2019 05:44 PM 55C0372/AAAJ/50096 City Council 23 — 89 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 5 of 6 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS end. There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap. Team Leader Edwin Mah QRpFESS/ptq Report Author Nelson N. Vo Q�� Edwin l �y Inspected By NN.Vo/E.Mah y Mah at No.27141 03/31/2021 CIVIL +Edwnh (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date) F OF ENO Printed on: Friday 09/20/2019 05:44 PM SSC0372/AAAJ/50096 City Council 23 — 90 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 6 of 6 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT IDENTIFICATION +xxxrxr+rrrxxir +xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx+++++x++++++i+tix++iii++ SUFFICIENCY RATING 79.5 (1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA 069 (8) STRUCTURE NUMBER 55CO372 PAINT CONDITION INDEX = N/A (5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)- ON 150000000 (2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT 12 (3) COUNTY CODE 059 (4) PLACE CODE 69000 ************* CLASSIFICATION ********+**** CODE (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED- SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL (112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- YES Y (7) FACILITY CARRIED- 5TH STREET (104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- NOT ON NHS 0 (9) LOCATION- 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN 16 (11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT 0 (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- NOT STRAHNET 0 (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- NOT ON NET 0 (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- NONE EXISTS N (13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2 WAY 2 (16) LATITUDE 33 DEG 44 MIN 55.78 SEC (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE- (17) LONGITUDE 117 DEG 54 MIN 34.27 SEC (105) FED.LANDS HWY- NOT APPLICABLE 0 (98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE $ SHARE S (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - NOT ON NET 0 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER (20) TOLL- ON FREE ROAD 3 (21) MAINTAIN- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 ******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL ********* (22) OWNER- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL- CONCRETE CONT (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- NOT ELIGIBLE 5 TYPE- TEE BEAM CODE 204 (44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL- OTHER/NA **************** CONDITION **************** CODE TYPE- OTHER/NA CODE 000 (58) DECK 7 (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 7 (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0 (60) SUBSTRUCTURE 7 (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- CIP CONCRETE CODE 1 (61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 (108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM: (62) CULVERTS N A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- CONCRETE CODE 1 ********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- NONE CODE 0 (31) DESIGN LOAD- MS-18 OR HS-20 5 C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- NONE CODE 0 (63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 AGE AND SERVICE *************** (64) OPERATING RATING- 62.9 (27) YEAR BUILT 1962 (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 2010 (66) INVENTORY RATING- 37.9 (42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN 5 (70) BRIDGE POSTING- EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS 5 UNDER- WATERWAY 5 (41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A (28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 04 UNDER STRUCTURE 00 (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 13000 DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION (30) YEAR OF ADT 2019 (109) TRUCK ADT 1 % **************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 7 *************** GEOMETRIC DATA **************** (68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 (48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 14.9 M (69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL N (49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 97.5 M (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 0.8 M (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 7 (51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 15.8 M (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1000 (52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 19.5 M (113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES .8 (32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 19.2 M ********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ********** (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- NO MEDIAN 0 (75) TYPE OF WORK- CODE (34) SKEW 26 DEG (35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO (76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT M (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M (94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 15.8 M (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M (9 TOTAL PROJECT COST (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR (9 REF- NOT H/RR 0.00 M 7)7) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- NOT H/RR 0.0 M (114) FUTURE ADT 27788 (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 +xiii+i+i+ixt++ NAVIGATION DATA *************** INSPECTIONS (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- NOT APPLICABLE CODE N (111) PIER PROTECTION- (90) INSPECTION DATE 02/19 (91) FREQUENCY 48 MO CODE (92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B) (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C) Printed on-.Friday 09/20/2019 05:44 PM 55C0372/AAAJ/50096 City Council 23 — 91 8/4/2026 Q Q Q 0 1 N a[ - 00 X w . � I I e i t N a) M N 3 4' A ' s� �r U > C O� co U a`) Uo o rl- ry .ai M O Y U o s u LO 0 0 Q Q Q rn 0 N N C O iz N UM I- _ 00 X LLB -21 lu M d� N owe k y T U in o O:9 am w do S o M. o r� o 6 o � U L m LO 0_ LU Q Q Q 0 (V V '�{ N iz N o f e .,Lbo t 00 a. r ' ff f fff r � M N 3- 1 �f '4 �U O U o � U M O � U LO LO i y • ._ _.. �- r� �' �3 e �{ 1 • �- ky r `�h�. ' t x ,, ,...w.,y ,. h ? y . o}'� k F. .; � �:,�ti t � ,_y, s* k ��* �� .� - i - n �M1: i � � � 4'� ti�. _ -� ' 5 4� ~'i ��4 � .. n >i�,'" •} nb .t 'Lb..�k SS �„ u w �': _.'b ? wry-.: _ l: y,, 3_�M1 1& "��x' i° 7 r .' � _ ' k P- L -.:t�• .. - _ -., T :. kr;.; ���- o� - -•, - � -� . ? � ' Ya . 5Ya1 L p 9�m ry •'L `�' � � � f� � rr �� � �• � _ � �' .4 �� ^ �$ li�l `,� • � � ' t• Q Q Q rn 0 N IN CN N iz O N UM \ _ 00 X LU j - y co ' I C'M I N M .LD U cp j M 05 a U0 U LY f o M 0 *k .o U L > a)u.-) d LU Q Q Q rn 0 N IN CD N iz N N Lbo = 00 X LU N I ■ 11I ••k A 1TT_ VJ C'M N G r L 0 5 Uo m � F Uo 0 N M 1 O O � U LO L m LO 0_ LU \ ± \ q _ D Lbo . \ . \ � y d \ - 2 - 00 X W2 . » f « » > \ 00 . . 7 I q N » .-Now \ , \« `�2 : • _ \: - - .* e 2 \ / —/ » L)$ F . o0 % �[ U S g . : 7 2 } k \ 2 ( \ \ \ @ EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 5 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridqe Number 55CO372 Structure Maintenance & Investigations Facility Carried: 5TH STREET Location 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD �. City ; SANTA ANA Inspection Date 02/27/2015 Inspection Type Bridge Inspection Report Routine FC Underwater Special Other 0 STRUCTURE NAME: SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION Year Built 1962 Skew (degrees) : 26 Year Widened: 2010 No. of Joints 3 Length (m) 97.5 No. of Hinges 2 Structure Description:Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (8 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles. Widening: South and north overhangs were widenined. Span Configuration : (W) 11.0 m, 5 @ 14.9 m, 11.0 m (E) c/c SAFE LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS Design Live Load: MS-18 OR HS-20 Inventory Rating: RF=1.17 =>37.9 metric tons Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Operating Rating: RF=1.94 =>62.9 metric tons Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Permit Rating PpppP Posting Load Type 3: Legal Type 3S2:Lega1 Type 3-3:Legal DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE Deck X-Section: (N) 0.3 m br, 1.5 m sw, 15.8 m, 1.5 m sw, 0.3 m br (S) Total Width: 19.5 m Net Width: 15.8 m No. of Lanes: 4 Speed: 35 mph Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired Overlay Thickness: 0.0 Inches Rail Code: 1000 Rail Type Location Length (ft)Rail Modifications _ype 26 Right/Left 1 642 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE C:-:a :ce1 Descr--ption: Concrete lined trapezoidal with bike/maintenance path under end spans. NOTICE The bridge inspection condition assessment used for this inspection is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Bridge Element Inspection Manual 2013 as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal law. The new element inspection methodology may result in changes to related condition and appraisal ratings on the bridge without significant physical changes at the bridge. The element condition information contained in this report represents the current condition of the bridge based on the most recent routine and special inspections. Some of the notes presented below may be from an inspection that occurred prior to the date noted in this report. Refer to the Scope and Access section of this inspection report for a description of which portions of the bridge were inspected on this date. INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS The channel was dry at the time of the inspection. All visible substructure elements were inspected. Pedestrian access is from any quadrant. REVISIONS Printed on:Tuesday 05/05/2015 07:42 AM 55C0372/AAAI/31334 City Council 23 — 99 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 2 of 5 INSPECTION COMMENTARY The inspection frequency was modified from 24 months to 48 months. DECK AND ROADWAY Both sidewalks exhibits map cracks up to 1.0 mm wide and 8" spacing. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY A Structure Rating Summary Sheet, dated 04/06/2013, is on-file for this structure. The current rating is based on a BDS computer output, dated 08/25/80. While this report does not include a check of that analysis, it does verify that the structural conditions observed during this inspection are consistent with those assumed in that analysis. ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY Elem Defect Defect Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. /Prot Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 16 Top Flange-RC 2 1710 sq.m 1510 200 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 200 0 200 0 0 511 Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete 2 1540 sq.m 1540 0 0 0 (16-1130) -The soffit in all spans exhibits several transverse cracks with light white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans #1, #2, #6 and V. ---------------- (16-511) There were no significant defects noted. 110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 780 m 779 1 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 1 0 0 (110-1080) — --- _ North girder at span #7 has a small spall 2" X 2" X 1" at 10 ft from east abutment. 182 EQ Restrainer Cable-Other 2 16 ea. 16 0 0 0 (182) - - --- There were no significant defects noted. 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 117 m 115 2 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 1 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 1 0 1 0 0 (210) - - There were no significant defects noted. (210-1080) ---_--- Pierwall #3 exhibits two spalls +/- 20" X 8" X 4" under the north girder west fascia; and an unsound concrete 15" X 4 ft at top of the footing cap B ft above the ground at west face. Pier wall #5 exhibits: * a spall 18" X 6" X 2" at the south end; * an unsound concrete area 8" X 2 ft under the north girder; and * an unsound concrete area 8" X 3 ft under the north girder just above the footing cap. Printed on:Tuesday 05/05/2015 07:42 AM 55C0372/AAAI/31334 City Council 23 — 100 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Pace 3 of ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY Elem Defect Defect Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. /Prot Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 Pier wall #6 exhibits a spall 18" X 6" X 2" at the south end. (210-1130) - - Pier wall #2 exhibits a vertical crack 0.5 mm wide. Pierwall #3 exhibits a vertical crack 2.0 mm wide at north end. Pier wall #4 exhibits a vertical crack 0.5 mm wide. 215 Abutment-RC 2 39 m 39 0 0 0 There were no significant defects noted. 227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. 256 Slope Protection 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 There were no significant defects noted. 301 Joint-Pourable Seal 2 44 m 34 10 0 0 2350 Debris Impaction (Joints) 2 10 0 10 0 0 (301-2350) -- Both joints was filled partially with debris in few locations. 304 Joint-Open Expansion 2 98 m 98 _ 0 0 0 (304) - There were no significant defects noted. 312 Bearing-Enclosed 2 4 each 4 0 0 0 There were no significant defects noted. 331 Railing-RC 2 196 m 191 5 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 5 0 5 0 0 (331-1130) There are several vertical cracks up to 1.0 mm wide in both rails. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE Printed on:Tuesday 05/05/2015 07:42 AM 55C0372/AAAI/31334 City Council 23 — 101 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 4 of 5 Team Leader Ashraf Shenouda QRpfESS/pN, Report Author Ashraf Shenouda c�0 t Ashraf el r Inspected By A.Shenouda/KD.Henderson Shenouda W /^ No.64332 S// 06/30/2015 CIVIL rAshraf Shen` da (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date) fr qtf 0 cP``i� Printed on:Tuesday 05/05/2015 07:42 AM 55C0372/AAAI/31334 City Council 23 — 102 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 ecige < STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT ++++++++++++++++ IDENTIFICATION SUFFICIENCY RATING 79.5 (1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA 069 STATUS (8) STRUCTURE NUMBER 55C0372 (5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)- ON 150000000 HEALTH INDEX 97.9 (2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT 12 PAINT CONDITION INDEX = N/A (3) COUNTY CODE 059 (4) PLACE CODE 69000 *********+*** CLASSIFICATION ********+**** CODE (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED- SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL (112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- YES Y (7) FACILITY CARRIED- 5TH STREET (104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- NOT ON NHS 0 (9) LOCATION- 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN 16 (11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT 0 (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- NOT STRAHNET 0 (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- NOT ON NET 0 (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- NONE EXISTS N (13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2 WAY 2 (16) LATITUDE 33 DEG 44 MIN 55.78 SEC (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE- (17) LONGITUDE 117 DEG 54 MIN 34.27 SEC (105) FED.LANDS HWY- NOT APPLICABLE 0 (98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE % SHARE (11C) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - NOT ON NET 0 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER (20) TOLL- ON FREE ROAD 3 (21) MAINTAIN- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 ******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL ********* (22) OWNER- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL- CONCRETE CONT (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- NOT ELIGIBLE 5 TYPE- TEE BEAM CODE 204 (44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL- OTHER/NA ++++++++*«++++++ CONDITION ++++++++++++++++ CODE TYPE- OTHER/NA CODE 000 (58) DECK 7 (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 7 (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 8 (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0 (60) SUBSTRUCTURE 8 (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- CIP CONCRETE CODE 1 (61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 (108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM: (62) CULVERTS N A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- CONCRETE CODE 1 ********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- NONE CODE 0 (31) DESIGN LOAD- MS-18 OR HS-20 5 C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- NONE CODE 0 (63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 *************** AGE AND SERVICE *************** (64) OPERATING RATING- 62.9 (27) YEAR BUILT 1962 (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 2010 (66) INVENTORY RATING- 37.9 (42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN 5 (70) BRIDGE POSTING- EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS 5 UNDER- WATERWAY 5 (41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A (28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 04 UNDER STRUCTURE 00 DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 13000 (30) YEAR OF ADT 2001 (109) TRUCK ADT 1 **************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 8 GEOMETRIC DATA **************** (68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 (48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 14.9 M (69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL N (49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 97.5 M (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 0.8 M (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 7 (51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 15.8 M (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1000 (52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 19.5 M (113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES 8 (32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 19.2 M xx******** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ********** (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- NO MEDIAN 0 (75) TYPE OF WORK- CODE (34) SKEW 26 DEG (35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO (76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT M (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M (94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 15.8 M (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M (96) TOTAL PROJECT COST (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- NOT H/RR 0.00 M ( YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE (1 (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- NOT H/RR 0.0 M 14)) FUTURE ADT 27239 (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M 5 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2035 ***++**++****++ NAVIGATION DATA *************** ***++*+++*++*** INSPECTIONS *******+++*++++ (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- NOT APPLICABLE CODE N (90) INSPECTION DATE 02/15 (91) FREQUENCY 48 MO (111) PIER PROTECTION- CODE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE (92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE 0.0 M A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B) (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C) Printed on:Tuesday 05/05/2015 07:42 AM 55CO372/AAAI/31334 City Council 23 — 103 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 4 AW DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridqe Number : 55CO372 Structure Maintenance S Investigations Facility Carried: 5TH STREET Location 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD raffrMw City : SANTA ANA Inspection Date 03/25/2013 Inspection Type Bridge Inspection Report Routine FC Underwater Special Other ❑x STRUCTURE NAME: SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION Year Built 1962 Skew (degrees) : 26 Year Widened: 2010 No. of Joints 3 Length (m) 97.5 No. of Hinges 2 Structure Description:Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (8 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles. Widening: South and north overhangs were widenined. Span Configuration (W) 11.0 m, 5 @ 14.9 m, 11.0 m (E) c/c LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS Design Live Load: MS-18 OR HS-20 Inventory Rating: RF=1.17 =>37.9 metric tons galculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Operating Rating: RF=1.94 =>62.9 metric tons Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Permit Rating PPPPP Posting Load Type 3: Legal Type 3S2:Legal Type 3-3:Legal DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE Deck X-Section: (N) 0.3 m br, 1.5 m sw, 15.8 m, 1.5 m sw, 0.3 m br (S) Total Width: 19.5 m Net Width: 15.8 m No. of Lanes: 4 Speed: 35 mph Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired Rail Code: 1000 Rail Type Location Length (ft)Rai l Modifications Type 26 Right/Left 642 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE Channel Description: Concrete lined trapezoidal with bike/maintenance path under end spans. INSPECTION COMMENTARY REVISIONS Because the bridge deck was covered with polyester concrete, so that smart flag 358 was moved to state 1. CONDITION OF STRUCTURE DECK The concrete deck was covered with polyester concrete, so the concrete deck is in a very good condition. SOFFIT The soffit in all spans exhibits several transverse cracks with light white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans #1, #2, 46 and #7. SUPERSTRUCTURE North girder at span #7 has a small spall 50 mm X 50 mm X 30 mm at 3.0 m from east abutment. Printed on:Monday 04/15/2013 12:40 PM 53C0372/AAAH/25593 City Council 23 - 104 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 2 of 4 INSPECTION CQbMNTARY SUBSTRUCTURE Pier wall 42 exhibits a vertical crack 0.5 mm wide. Pierwall #3 exhibits a vertical crack 2.0 mm wide at north end; and two spalls +/- 500 mm X 200 mm X 100 mm under the north girder west fascia. Pier wall 44 exhibits a vertical crack 0.5 mm wide. Pier wall 45 exhibits a spall 450 mm X 150 mm X 35 mm at the south end. Pier wall #6 exhibits a spall 450 mm X 150 mm X 35 mm at the south end. CHANNEL/WATERWAY INVESTIGATION The channel was dry at the time of the inspection. All substructure elements were inspected. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY A Load Rating Summary Sheet is included with this bridge inspection report. The current rating has been assigned in accordance with SMI procedures. MISCELLANEOUS Vehicular access into the channel is from the southwest quadrant of McFadden Avenue, from the southwest quadrant of Edinger Avenue, from the southwest quadrant of Fifth Street, and from the northwest quadrant of Fairview Street. ELEbMT TNGPE -TION ATTN. Elem Total Qty in each Condition State No. Element Description Env Qty Units St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 St. 5 12 Concrete Deck - Bare 2 1710 sq.m. 1710 0 0 0 0 110 Reinforced Conc Open Girder/Beam 2 780 M. 779 1 0 0 182 Other Type EQ Restrainer Cable 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 0 210 Reinforced Conc Pier Wall 2 117 M. 116 1 0 0 215 Reinforced Conc Abutment 2 39 M. 39 0 0 0 0 227 Reinforced Conc Submerged Pile 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 0 256 Slope Protection 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 0 301 Pourable Joint Seal 2 44 M. 44 0 0 304 Open Expansion Joint 2 98 M. 98 0 0 0 0 312 Enclosed/Concealed Bearing 2 4 ea. 4 0 0 0 0 331 Reinforced Conc Bridge Railing 2 196 M. 196 0 0 0 0 358 Deck Cracking 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 359 Soffit of Concrete Deck or Slab 2 1 ea. 0 0 1 0 0 WORK REC01-MMATIONS - NONE Printed on:Monday 04/15/2013 12:40 PH 55C0372/AAAH/25593 City Council 23 — 105 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 3 of 4 Team Leader Ashraf Shenouda QRoFESSio Report Author Ashraf Shenouda c�0 �( �4 Ashraf F,y Inspected By A.Shenouda/KD.Henderson h Shenouda C *^ 4t I^ x No.64332Zia � 06/30/2013 CIVIL A raf Shenoud (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date) qtF OF Printed on:Monday 04/15/2013 12:40 PM 55C0372/AAAH/25593 City Council 23 — 106 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 4 of 4 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT w xxxxww+++++w+++ IDENTIFICATION ++++w+++x+xx++x w+xxxx+++xx++++++x++xx+xx+++x+x++x++++++w++++++ s (1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA 069 SUFFICIENCY RATING 79.5 (8) STRUCTURE NUMBER 55C0372 STATUS (5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)- ON 1500MO620 HEALTH INDEX gg g (2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT 12 PAINT CONDITION INDEX N/A (3) COUNTY CODE 059 (4) PLACE CODE 69000 ************* CLASSIFICATION ************* CODE (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED- SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL (112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- YES y (7) FACILITY CARRIED- 5TH STREET (104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- NOT ON NHS 0 (9) LOCATION- 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN 16 (11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT 0 (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- NOT STRAHNET 0 (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- NOT ON NET 0 (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- NONE EXISTS N (13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2 WAY 2 (16) LATITUDE 33 DEG 44 MIN 56 SEC (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE- (17) LONGITUDE 117 DEG 54 MIN 32 SEC (105) FED.LANDS HWY- NOT APPLICABLE 0 (98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE % SHARE 8 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - NOT ON NET 0 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER (20) TOLL- ON FREE ROAD 3 (21) MAINTAIN- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 ******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL ********* (22) OWNER- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL- CONCRETE CONT (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- NOT ELIGIBLE 5 TYPE- TEE BEAM CODE 204 (44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL- OTHER/NA **+***********+* CONDITION **************** CODE TYPE- OTHER/NA CODE 000 (58) DECK 6 (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 7 (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 6 (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0 (60) SUBSTRUCTURE 7 (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- CIP CONCRETE CODE 1 (61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 (108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM: (62) CULVERTS N A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- CONCRETE CODE I ***'***** LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- NONE CODE 0 (31) DESIGN LOAD- MS-18 OR HS-20 5 C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- NONE CODE 0 (63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 *************** AGE AND SERVICE *************** (69) OPERATING RATING- 62.9 (27) YEAR BUILT 1962 (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 2010 (66) INVENTORY RATING- 37.9 (42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN 5 (70) BRIDGE POSTING- EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS 5 UNDER- WATERWAY 5 (41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A (28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 04 UNDER STRUCTURE 00 DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 13000 (30) YEAR OF ADT 2001 (109) TRUCK ADT 1 % **************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 6 *************** GEOMETRIC DATA ***'************ (68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 (48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 14.9 M (69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL N (49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 97.5 M (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 0.8 M (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 7 (51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 15.8 M (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1000 (52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 19.5 M (113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES 8 (32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 19.2 M ********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ********** (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- NO MEDIAN 0 (75) TYPE OF WORK- CODE (34) SKEW 26 DEG (35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO (76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT M (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M (94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 15.8 M (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M (96) TOTAL PROJECT COST (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- NOT H/RR 0.00 M ( YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE (1 (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- NOT H/RR 0.0 M 14)) FUTURE ADT 27239 (11 (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M 55) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2035 +++++++++++x+++ NAVIGATION DATA *****++xx++++++ +++++++w++++w++ INSPECTIONS (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- NOT APPLICABLE CODE N (90) INSPECTION DATE 03/13 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO (111) PIER PROTECTION- CODE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE (92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE 0.0 M A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B) (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C) Printed on:Monday 04/15/2013 12:40 PPI 55C0372/AAAH/25593 City Council 23 — 107 8/4/2026 EXHIRIT 7 Page I of 4 AWDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Number 55C0372 Structure Maintenance & Investigations Facility Carried: 5TH STREET Location 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD 4kfbwno City SANTA ANA Inspection Date 04/26/2011 Inspection Type Bridge Inspection Report Routine FC Underwater Special Other L �1 I-i �1 I—I STRUCTURE NAME: SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION Year Built 1962 Skew (degrees) : 26 Year Widened: N/A No. of Joints 3 Length (m) 97.5 No. of Hinges 2 Structure Description:Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (8 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles. Widening: South and north overhangs were widenined. Span Configuration (W) 11.0 m, 5 @ 14.9 m, 11.0 m (E) c/c T T Design Live Load: MS-18 OR HS-20 Inventory Rating: 37.2 metric tonnes Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Operating Rating: 61.6 metric tonnes Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR PeTlit Rating PPPpp Posting Load Type 3: Legal Type 3S2:Legal Type 3-3:Lega1 DESCRIPTION 0r7 STRIICTU'R1e Deck X-Section: (N) 0.3 m br, 1.5 m sw, 15.8 m, 1.5 m sw, 0.3 m br (S) Total Width: 19.5 m Net Width: 15.8 m No. of Lanes: 4 Rail Description: Type 26 Rail Code 1000 Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE Channel Description: Concrete lined trapezoidal with bike/maintenance path under end spans. CONDITION TEXT REVISIONS The bridge was widened from both sides, some of the elements quantities will increase and some elements will change with different types as follows: Deck area was changed from 1724 m2 to 1501 m2; NBI #33 was modified from 2 (closed median w/o barrier) to 0 (no median) ; NBI #50A (Sidewalk Left) was modified from 0.8 m to 1.5 m; NBI #50B (Sidewalk Right) was modified from 0.8 m to 1.5 m; NBI #52 (Deck Width out to out) was modified from 17.7 m to 19.50 m; and The old metal rail was removed and replaced with concrete rail (type 26), so element # 337 was replaced with element #331 with the same quantity. The bridge has been seismically retrofitted at spans hinge #3 and #5. Element 4182 was added to ELI list (2 each) st. 1. Because the deck cracks were sealed with methacrylate, so that smart flag 358 was moved from state 3 to state 1. CONDITION OF STRUCTURE Printed on.Fri.day 06/03/2011 11753 AM 55C0372/AAAG/20851 City Council 23 — 108 8/4/2026 Page 2 of 4 CONDITION TEXT The concrete deck cracks were sealed with methacrylate. The soffit in all spans exhibits several transverse cracks with light white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans #1, #2, #6 and #7. North girder at span 44 has a small spall at 3.0 m from east abutment. Pier wall #2 has a minor vertical crack < 0.5 mm wide. Pierwall #3 has a vertical severe crack at north end 2.0 mm wide; and two spalls +/- (500 X 200 X 100 ) mm under the north girder west fascia. Pier wall #4 has a minor vertical crack < 0.5 mm wide. Pier wall #5 has a spall (450 X 150 X 35) mm at the south end. Pier wall #6 has a spall (450 X 150 X 35) mm at the south end. CHANNEL/WATERWAY INVESTIGATION The channel was dry at the time of the inspection. All substructure elements were only inspected in spans #1, #6 & #7. MISCELLANEOUS Photos of this structure were taken and are included in this report. Vehicular access into the channel is from the southwest quadrant of McFadden Avenue, from the southwest quadrant of Edinger Avenue, from the southwest quadrant of Fifth Street, and from the northwest quadrant of Fairview Street, RT.1xMRNT TNCARf'T T(1N RATTN(3:4 Elem Total Qty in each Condition State No. Element Description Env Qty Units St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 St. 5 12 Concrete Deck - Bare 2 1710 sq.m. 1710 0 0 0 0 110 Reinforced Cone Open Girder/Seam 2 760 M. 779 1 0 0 182 Other Type EQ Restrainer Cable 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 0 210 Reinforced Conc Pier Wall 2 117 M. 116 1 0 0 215 Reinforced Conc Abutment 2 39 M. 39 0 0 0 0 227 Reinforced Conc Submerged Pile 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 0 256 Slope Protection 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 0 301 Pourable Joint Seal 2 44 M. 44 0 0 304 Open Expansion Joint 2 98 M. 98 0 0 0 0 312 Enclosed/Concealed Bearing 2 4 ea. 4 0 0 0 0 331 Reinforced Conc Bridge Railing 2 196 M. 196 0 0 0 0 358 Deck Cracking 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 359 Soffit of Concrete Deck or Slab 2 1 ea. 0 0 1 0 0 WORK RECObDENDATIONS - NONE Printed on:Friday 06/03/2011 11:53 AM 55C0372/AAAG/20851 City Council 23 — 109 8/4/2026 - - - EDI--I I BIT 2 Page 3 of 4 Inspected By A.Shenouda/KD.Henderson QOFrSSiON 4�0 Ashraf y Shenouda r Ashraf Shen,,Iuda (Registered Civil Engineer) cc No.64332 70 # 0613012011 # �.� CIVIL Of ak%i Printed on:Friday 06/03/2011 11:53 AM 55C0372/AAAG/20851 City Council 23 — 110 8/4/2026 )"BIT2 Page 4 of 4 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT +#+*+*+++t+++#++ IDENTIFICATION +rr+x+++r++++++ r+++**+++++++++++++++#++r+rx•+++++++r+x+++r++tt SUFFICIENCY RATING = 79.5 (1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA 069 STATUS (8) STRUCTURE NUMBER 55C0372 (5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)- ON ISOOM0620 HEALTH INDEX 9919 (2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT 12 PAINT CONDITION INDEX = N/A 3) COUNTY CODE C59 **+*+#*****+* CLASSIFICATION ww+****+w+w+* CODE { (4) PLACE CODE 69000 (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED- SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL (112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- YES Y (7) FACILITY CARRIED- 5TH STREET (104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- NOT ON NHS 0 (9) LOCATION- 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN 16 (11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT 0 (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- NOT STRAHNFT 0 (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- NOT ON NET 0 (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- NONE EXISTS N (13) IRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUEROUTE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2 WAY 2 (16) LATITUDE 33 DEG 44 MIN 56 SEC (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE- (17) LONGITUDE 117 DEG 54 MIN 32 SEC (105) FED.LANDS HWY- NOT APPLICABLE 0 (98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE * SHARE % (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - NOT ON NET 0 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER (20) TOLL- ON FREE ROAD 3 (21) MAINTAIN- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 **t+w+*+ STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL ***+****+ (22) OWNER- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERTAL- CONCRETE CONT (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- NOT ELIGIBLE 5 TYPE- TEE BEAM CODE 204 (44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL- OTHER/NA *********++****# CONDITION ++****+*+******* CODE TYPE- OTHER/NA CODE 000 (58) DECK 6 (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 7 (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 6 (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0 (60) SUBSTRUCTURE 7 (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- CIP CONCRETE CODE 1 (61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 (106) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM: (62) CULVERTS N A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- CONCRETE CODE 1 **t#t*+** LOAD RATING AND POSTING *+++***** CODE B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- NONE CODE 0 (31) DESIGN LOAD- MS-18 OR HS-20 5 C) TYPE OF DECK v1EUTION- NONE CODE 0 (63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 t+++++**++++r*t AGE AND SERVICE +*+x++r++r++*r+ (64) OPERATING RATING- 61.6 (27) YEAR BUILT 1962 (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 0000 (66) INVENTORY RATING- 37.2 (42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN 5 (70) BRIDGE POSTING- EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS 5 UNDER- WATERWAY 5 (41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A (28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 04 UNDER STRUCTURE 00 (29) AVERAGE ➢AILY TRAFFIC 13000 DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION (30) YEAR OF ADT 2001 (109) TRUCK ADT 1 * **+x**►t■#xw* APPRAISAL +++rw*#*#*rt++t* CODE (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 6 x*****xxw++***t GEOMETRIC DATA *t++###r+++*}+tr (68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 (48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 14.9 M (69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL N (49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 97.5 M (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 0.8 M (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 7 (51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 15.8 M (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1000 (52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 19.5 M (113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES 8 (32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOUI.OERS) 19.2 M ********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ***x+***** (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- NO MEDIAN 0 (75) TYPE OF WORK- SUP/SUB REHAB CODE 35 (34) SKEW 26 DEG (35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO (76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT 97.5 M (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M (94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST $1,724,000 (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 15.8 M (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST $344,800 (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M (96) TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,896,320 (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- NOT H/RR 0.00 M (97) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE 2010 (55) MIN LAT UNDERCY.EAR RT REF- NOT H/RR 0.0 M (114) FUTURE ADT 26701 (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2029 +++**#x+++**#x* NAVIGATION DATA ++t++##++++***+ ++++rr++++*+++r INSPECTIONS **+++*+###*+**+ (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- NOT APPLICABLE CODE N (90) INSPECTION DATE 04/11 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO (111) PIER PROTECTION- CODE (92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO By (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C) Printed on:Friday 06/03/2011 11:53 AM 55C0372/AAAG/20851 City Council 23 — 111 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 4 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Hum-her 55C0372 &AV Structure Maintenance & Investigations Facility Carried: 5TH STREET Location 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD City SANTA ANA Inspection Date : 02/17/2009 Inspection Type Bridge Inspection Report Routine PC Underwater Special Other rl F-I F-I rI EI STRUCTURE NAME: SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION Year Built 1962 Skew (degrees) : 26 Year Widened: N/A No. of Joints 3 Length (m) 97.5 No. of Hinges 2 Structure Description: Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (8 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles. Span Configuration (W) 11.0 m, 5 @ 14.9 m, 11.0 m (E) c/c LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS Design Live Load: MS-18 OR HS-20 Inventory Rating: 37.2 metric tonnes Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Operating Rating: 61.6 metric tonnes Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR Permit Rating ppppp Posting Load Type 3: Legal Type 3S2:Legal Type 3-3:Legal DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE Deck X-Section: (N) 0.1 m br, 0.8 m cu, 15.6 m, 0.6 m cu, 0.1 m br (S) Total Width: 17.7 m Net Width: 15.8 m No. of Lanes: 4 Rail Description: MBGR w/raised curb Rail Code 1000 Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE Channel Description: Concrete lined trapezoidal with bike/maintenance path under end spans. CONDITION TEXT REVISIONS Element #110: a quantity of 1 m was moved from st. 1 to st. 2. Smart flag 358 was changed from st. 2 to st. 3. Smart flag 358 was changed from st. 2 to st. 3. CONDITION OF STRUCTURE Due to heavy rain in the previous days, there is only access to spans #1, #6 and V. There are various minor spalls in the concrete deck; and there are some deck spalls were patched with A/C. The concrete deck exhibits several transverse cracks, moderate in size and minor to moderate in density. The pourable joint seal continues to fail, i.e., it is cracking, breaking up and flaking out. Printed on-.Monday 04/27/2009 02:27 PM 55C0372/AAAF/15936 City Council 23 — 112 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 2 of 4 CONDITION TEST The expansion joint material along the longitudinal joint has fallen off and debris is lightly impacting joint. The soffit exhibits several transverse cracks with light white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans #1, #2, #6 and #7. North girder at span #4 has a small spall at 3.0 in from east abutment. There is one vertical severe crack at pierwall #3 at north end. CHANNEL/WATERWAY INVESTIGATION The water in the channel was 0.5 m deep through spans #2 to #6. No underwater investigation was necessary. All substructure elements were only inspected in spans #1, #6 & V. MISCELLANEOUS Vehicular access into the channel is from the southwest quadrant of McFadden Avenue, from the southwest quadrant of Edinger Avenue, from the southwest quadrant of Fifth Street, and from the northwest quadrant of Fairview Street. ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS F#Elem Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 St. 5 101 12 Concrete Deck - Bare 2 1710 sq.m. 0 1710 0 0 0 101 110 Reinforced Conc Open 2 780 M. 779 1 0 0 Girder/Beam 101 210 Reinforced Conc Pier Wall 2 117 M. 116 1 0 0 101 215 Reinforced Conc Abutment 2 39 M. 39 0 0 0 0 101 227 Reinforced Conc Submerged Pile 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 0 101 256 Slope Protection 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0 0 101 301 Pourable Joint Seal 2 44 M. 26 10 8 101 304 Open Expansion Joint 2 98 m. 98 0 0 0 0 101 312 Enclosed/Concealed Bearing 2 4 ea. 4 0 0 0 0 101 337 Metal Railing (W6X25 Posts) 2 196 M. 194 2 0 0 101 358 Deck Cracking 2 1 ea. 0 0 1 0 01 359 Soffit of Concrete Deck or Slab 2 1 ea. 0 0 1 0 0 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS RecDate: 02/27/2007 EstCost: Clean and seal the concrete deck cracks Action : Deck-Methacrylate StrTarget: 2 YEARS by coating the bridge deck with Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: methacrylate. Status : PROPOSED EA: RecDate: 02/27/2007 EstCost: patch all the minor spalls in the Action : Deck-Patch spalls StrTarget: 2 YEARS concrete deck; and repatch the deck Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: spalls which were previously patched with Status . PROPOSED EA: A/C. Remove A/C patching and repair with epoxy bonded cement mortar. Printed on:Monday 04/27/2009 02:27 PM 55C0372/AAAF/15936 City Council 23 — 113 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 3 of 4 Inspected By m A.Shenouda/M.Zolfaghari S.SNfy�G� � Z D No.C 64332 Registered Civil Engineer ti z * .June 30d� * , Printed on.Monday 04/27/2009 02:27 PM 55C0372/AAAF/15936 City Council 23 — 114 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 Page 4 of 4 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT IDENTIFICATION SUFFICIENCY RATING = 764 (1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA 069 STATUS STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (8) STRUCTURE NUMEER 55C0372 HEALTH INDEX g5,q (5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)- ON 1500M0620 (2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT 12 PAINT CONDITION INDEX = N/A (3) COUNTY CODE 059 (4) PLACE CODE 69000 *""**+****+*" CLASSIFICATION ********"*+ri CODE (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED- SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL (112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- YES Y (7) FACILITY CARRIED- 5TH STREET (104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- NOT ON NHS 0 (9) LOCATION- 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN 16 (11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT 0 (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- NOT STRAHNET 0 (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- NOT ON NET 0 (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- NONE EXISTS N (13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE 00 (1021 ❑IRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2 WAY 2 (16) LATITUDE 33 DEG 44 MIN 56 SEC (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE- (17) LONGITUDE 117 DEG 54 MIN 32 SEC (105) FED.LANDS HWY- NOT APPLICABLE 0 (98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE SHARE (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - NOT ON NET 0 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER (20) TOLL- ON FREE ROAD 3 (21) MAINTAIN- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 ****++*w STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL *****•*** (22) OWNER- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL- CONCRETE CONT (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- NOT ELIGIBLE 5 TYPE- TEE BEAM CODE 204 (44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL- r+r++aa++*+++++r CONDITION r+•+a+xx+r+ri+x+ CODE TYPE- CODE (58) DECK 4 (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 7 (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 6 (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0 (60) SUBSTRUCTURE 7 (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- CIP CONCRETE CODE 1 (61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL FRure:CTION 9 (108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM: (62) CULVERTS N A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- CONCRETE CODE 1 **+*"++** LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- NONE CODE 0 (31) DESIGN LOAD- MS-18 OR HS-20 5 C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- NONE CODE 0 (63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 *++x++rxa+a++x+ AGE AND SERVICE rasa+++++*r+ava (64) OPERATING RATING- 61.6 (27) YEAR BUILT 1962 (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1 (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 0000 (66) INVENTORY RATING- 37.2 (42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN 5 (70) BRIDGE POSTING- EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS 5 UNDER- WATERWAY 5 (41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A (28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 04 UNDER STRUCTURE 00 DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 13000 (30) YEAR OF ADT 2001 (109) TRUCK ADT 1 1 +*********+***** APPRAISAL ***************+ CODE (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 6 GEOMETRIC DATA ********+******* (68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 (48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 14.9 M (69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL N (49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 97.5 M (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 0.8 M (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 7 (51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 15.8 M (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1000 (52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 17.7 M (113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES 8 (32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 19.2 M **vrrr++++ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ****+***** (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- CLOSED (NO BARRIER) 2 (75) TYPE OF WORK- CODE (34) SKEW 26 DEG (35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO (76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT M (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M (94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST $741,320 (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 15.8 M (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST $148,264 (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M (96) TOTAL PROJECT COST $BB9,584 (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- NOT H/RR 0.00 M (97) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE 2009 (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- NOT H/RR 0.0 M (114) FUTURE ADT 26701 (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2029 +++r+r+++++++++ NAVIGATION DATA vwi+++++++x ry w+ *++xx+x+a•+rr+r INSPECTIONS r+a+++x+r+x++*+ (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- NOT APPLICABLE CODE N (90) INSPECTION DATE 02/09 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO (111) PIER PROTECTION- CODE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B) (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C) Printed on:Monday 04/27/2009 02:27 PM 55C0372/AAAF/15936 City Council 23 — 115 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 California Department of Transportation Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance and Investigations BRIDGE NSPECTION CORDS NFORMATION SYSTEM The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS. These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual. Records for "Confidential" bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. City Council 23 — 116 8/4/2026 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Mainte BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT 4r* _ EX_H�B�T2 Routine Inspectionaffim_w -- BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE: 55CO047 SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL February 7, 2023 BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION (9)LOCATION 0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE (7)FACILITY CARRIED FLOWER ST (11)POSTMILE 0 (6)FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL (16)LATITUDE 33'46'13.83" (5)INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000 (17)LONGITUDE 117'52'33.61" (104)ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION (58)DECK 5 FAIR DECK AREA(M)2 705 (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 92.4 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A (62)CULVERT N N/A(NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT(SD)STATUS NOT SD (67)STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION N F y - pll,. III�IIII �_� Routine-Roadway View(02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View(02/13/2019) r Routine-Underside View(02/20/2015) TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo o QR13FESS/0,yq� REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo Edwin Mah INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah No. 27141 jO Exp. 03/31/2025 9/11/2023 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) Date tE `FD�P City Council 23 — 117 4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations STRUCTUREOVERVIEW AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION (1)STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069 (90)INSPECTION DATE 02/23(91)FREQUENCY 24 MO (2)HIGHWAY DISTRICT 12 (92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE (3)COUNTY CODE (55)ORANGE A)NSTM INSP N-NO MO A) N/A (4)PLACE CODE (69000)SANTA ANA B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A (21)MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI C)OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A (22)OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI (98)BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE N/A (99)BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (27) YEAR BUILT 1930 (45)MAIN SPANS 4 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 1: CONCRETE (106)YEAR MODIFIED N/A (46)APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04:TEE BEAM (34)SKEW 45 (48)MAX SPAN(M) 11 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (49)LENGTH (M) 44.5 (35)STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112)NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 5 NO.OF HINGES 0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Simply supported 4-span CIP/RC T-girder(11 each)with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported on spread footings. SPAN CONFIGURATION (S)4 @ 36.0 feet(N). OPERATIONAL INF• ' • LOAD CAPACITY (31)DESIGN LOAD 4 M 18 (H 20) (65)CALC METHOD 8 LRFR RATING FACTOR (66)INVENTORY RATING RF= 1.10 (63)CALC METHOD 8 LRFR RATING FACTOR (64)OPERATING RATING RF= 1.48 (70)BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS (41)STRUCTURE STATUS A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING PPPPP OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches POSTING LOADS Safe Existing Posting Loads Ordinance/Order Signs Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons NONE Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Speed 25 N/A N/A MPH Additional Signs NONE Posting Date N/A Load Rating Summary Date 08/28/15 Load Rating Type Calculated Load Rating Tool-Date BrR 6.7.0 AASHTO-08/28/15 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53)MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54)MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M City Council 23 — 118 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge. The channel is dry. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. DECK AND ROADWAY AC Roadway is in good condition at the northerly abutment. The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck. The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.06 inches wide and 16.0 inches in spacing. In addtion, there is an area of bridge deck that has been covered with Asphalt, northerly abutment. Type A joint seal (1.0 to 1.5 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit)has been cracking, disbonding completely at both abutment joint locations and hinges, mainly at northerly abutment. Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls(36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location. Both concrete bridge railings were painted. PCC approach and departure slabs are fairly new at the southerly abutment location. The northerly abutment joint seal is covered with AC roadway at the approach. SUPERSTRUCTURE There is no notable distress observed at the time of inspection. SUBSTRUCTURE There is a debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that has been accumulating in the front at 10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep. In addition,the tree is laying down at easterly end of pier wall 3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location at(30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep)southeast corner of spans 2 and 3. The work recommendation has been made back in 02/20/2015 but it has not done yet. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 08/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 08/28/2015. SPECIAL • N INFORMATIO STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. City Council 23 — 119 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 3 of 6 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations DECK AND ROADWAY DECK CROSS SECTION (W) 1.3 feet br, 5.0 feet sw, 39.3 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.3 feet br(E). DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION (49) LENGTH 44.5 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 12.0 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 15.8 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE&SUBRTE (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 19.8 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 19-LOCAL URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 NO MEDIAN (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE 1-CONCRETE (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 12.0 M B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE 0-NONE (68) DECK GEOMETRY 5 ABOVE TOLERABLE C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE (72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT OVERLAY THICKNESS(inches) 0 inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 5500 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (30) YEAR OF ADT 2021 (109) TRUCK ADT% 1 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (28a) LANES 2 (114) FUTURE ADT 10688 SPEED 25 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING r 5 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 16 Top Flange-RC 2 703 sq.m 496 207 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 7 0 7 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 200 0 200 0 0 (16)Top Flange-RC Deck cracks with numerous minor deck spalls. (16-1080)Delamination/Spall/Patched Area The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck. (16-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.05 inches wide, 16.0 inches in spacing. The bridge deck has random diagonal soffit cracks with white efflorescence inside most bays mainly bays#2 and#3 throughout all spans. JOINT APPROACH . RAIL INFORMATION (36a)Rail Code 1 (36b)Transition 1 (36c)Appr Guardrail 1 (36d)Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 25 MPH JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Oty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 301 Joint-Pourable Seal 2 110 m 0 0 40 70 2330 Seal Damage(Joints) 2 110 0 0 40 70 (301)Joint-Pourable Seal Dlchnnrling and rrrarking City Council 23 — 120 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations JOINT - APPROACH RAIL JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (301-2330)Seal Damage(Joints) All joints seals of the pourable joints are failed completely. 321 Approach Slab-RC 2 148 sq.m 148 0 0 0 (321)Approach Slab-RC There were no significant defects noted. Approach and departure slabs are with Asphalt ovelay on top. 331 Railing-RC 2 90 m 90 0 0 0 (331)Railing-RC There were no significant defects noted. SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 489 m 489 0 0 0 (110)Girder/Beam-RC There were no significant defects noted. 182 EQ Restrainer Cable-Other 2 15 ea. 15 0 0 0 (182)EQ Restrainer Cable-Other There were no significant defects noted. SUBSTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V-H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A (71) WATER ADEQUACY 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (61) CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M (113) SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M SCOUR POA DATE N/A CHANNEL DESCRIPTION Natural earth trapezoidal with a cobbled earth invert. SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 66 m 63 3 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 3 0 3 0 0 (210-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) Pier wall#2 exhibits three vertical cracks 1.0 mm wide at G#3,#4 and#9. Pier wall#3 exhibits four vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide. Pier wall#4 exhibits three vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide. 215 Abutment-RC 2 68 m 67 1 0 0 1oRn Delamination/Small/Patched Area 9 1 n 1 n n Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area North abutment cap exhibits a spall 2.5 X 1 ft X 1 ft, part of this spall should support the westerly girder,therefore bearing area of 6" of an equilateral triangle was lost. 234 Pier Cap-RC 2 1 m 1 0 0 0 (234) Pier Cap-RC The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. There were no significant defects noted. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/01/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Misc. Str Target ROUTINE EA Sawcut, remove all loose material; and then, patch sidewalk spall with cement mortar concrete as the following location below: Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls(36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location. Rec Date 02/12/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Methacrylate Str Target ROUTINE EA Prior to seal deck cracks with Methacrylate. Contractors need to clean and patch all deck spalls. JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 10/04/1995 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Joints-Repair/Clean Str Target ROUTINE EA Replace the deteriorated Type A joints seal as follows: South Abutment:Width of joint is 1.75 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. Pier wall 2:Width of joint is 0.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. Pier wall 3:Width of joint is 1.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. Pier wall 4:Width of joint is 0.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. North Abutment:Width of joint is 1.75 inch at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/01/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Mech/Elect-Misc. Str Target ROUTINE EA Secure all the electrical conduits right in front of both abutment walls. OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/20/2015 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Scour-Place Counterm Str Target ROUTINE EA Remove debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that was accumulated in the front 10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep. Remove the tree that is laying down at easterly end of pier wall#3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location 30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep. City Council 23 — 122 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 6 of 6 Page 1 of 6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Number 55CO047EXHIBIT 2 Structure Maintenance & Investigations Facility Carried: FLOWER ST AW Location ; 0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE City ; SANTA ANA Inspection Date 02/01/2021 Inspection Type Bridge Inspection Report Routine FC Underwater Special Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ STRUCTURE NAME: SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION Year Built : 1930 Skew (degrees) : 45 Year Modified: N/A No. of Joints 5 Length (m) : 44.5 No. of Hinges 0 Structure Descripticn: Simply supported 4-span CIP/RC T-girder (11 each) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported on spread footings. Span Configuration : (S) 4 @ 36.0 feet (N) . SAFE LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS Design Live Load: M-18 OR H-20 Inventory Rating: RF= 1.10 Calculation Method: (LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING Operating Rating: RF- 1.48 Calculation Method: (LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING Permit Rating PPPPP Posting Load Type 3: Legal Type 3S2: Legal Type 3-3:Legal DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE Deck X-Section: (W) 1.3 feet br, 5.0 feet sw, 39.3 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.3 feet br (E) . Total Width: 15.8 m Net Width: 12.0 m No. of Lanes: 2 Speed: 25 mph Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired Overlay Thickness: 0.0 inches Rail Code: 1110 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE Channel Description: Natural earth trapezoidal with a cobbled earth invert. NOTICE The bridge inspection condition assessment used for this inspection is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Bridge Element Inspection Manual 2013 as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal law. The new element inspection methodology may result in changes to related condition and appraisal ratings on the bridge without significant physical changes at the bridge. The element condition information contained in this report represents the current condition of the bridge based on the most recent routine and special inspections. Some of the notes presented below may be from an inspection that occurred prior to the date noted in this report. Refer to the Scope and Access section of this inspection report for a description of which portions of the bridge were inspected on this date. INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge. The channel is dry at the time of inspection. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. P ' City Council 23 — 123 8/4/2026 Page 2 of 6 INSPECTION COMMENTARY EXHIBIT 2 DECK AND ROADWAY AC Roadway is in good condition at the northerly abutment. The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck. The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.06 inches wide and 16.0 inches in spacing. In addtion, there is an area of bridge deck that has been covered with Asphalt, northerly abutment. Type A joint seal (1.0 to 1.5 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit) has been cracking, disbonding completely at both abutment joint locations and hinges, mainly at northerly abutment. Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location. Both concrete bridge railings were painted. PCC approach and departure slabs are fairly new at the southerly abutment location. The northerly abutment joint seal is covered with AC roadway at the approach. SUPERSTRUCTURE There is no notable distress observed at the time of inspection. SUBSTRUCTURE There is a debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that has been accumulating in the front at 10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep. In addition, the tree is laying down at easterly end of pier wall 3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location at (30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep) southeast corner of spans 2 and 3. The work recommendation has been made back in 02/20/2015 but it has not done yet. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 08/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 08/28/2015. ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY Elem Defect Defect Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. /Prot Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 16 Top Flange-RC 2 703 sq.m 496 207 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 7 0 7 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 200 0 200 0 0 (16) Deck cracks with numerous minor deck spalls. (16-1080) The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck. (16-1130) The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.05 inches wide, 16.0 inches P City Council 23 — 124 8/4/2026 Page 3 of 6 ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY EXHIBIT 2 Elem Defect Defect Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. /Prot Qty St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 in spacing. The bridge deck has random diagonal soffit cracks with white efflorescence inside most bays mainly bays # 2 and 43 throughout all spans. 110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 489 m 489 0 0 0 (110) There were no significant defects noted. 182 EQ Restrainer Cable-Other 2 15 ea. 15 0 0 0 (182) There were no significant defects noted. 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 66 m 63 3 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 3 0 3 0 0 (210-1130) Pier wall #2 exhibits three vertical cracks 1.0 mm wide at G #3, #4 and #9. Pier wall #3 exhibits four vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide. Pier wall #4 exhibits three vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide. 215 Abutment-RC 2 68 m 67 1 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 1 0 0 (215-1080) North abutment cap exhibits a spall 2.5 X 1 ft X 1 ft, part of this spall should support the westerly girder, therefore bearing area of 6" of an equilateral triangle was lost. 234 Pier Cap-RC 2 1 m 1 0 0 0 (234) The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. There were no significant defects noted. 301 Joint-Pourable Seal 2 110 m 0 0 40 70 2330 Seal Damage (Joints) 2 110 0 0 40 70 (301) Disbonding and cracking. (301-2330) All joints seals of the pourable joints are failed completely. 321 Approach Slab-RC 2 148 sq.m 148 0 0 0 (321) There were no significant defects noted. Approach and departure slabs are with Asphalt ovelay on top. 331 Railing-RC 2 90 m 90 0 0 0 (331) There were no significant defects noted. P . City Council 23 — 125 8/4/2026 Page 4 of 6 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBIT 2 RecDate: 02/01/2021 EstCost: Sawcut, remove all loose material; and Action : Deck-Misc. StrTarget: 2 YEARS then, patch sidewalk spall with cement Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: mortar concrete as the following location Status : PROPOSED EA: below: Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location. RecDate: 02/01/2021 EstCost: Secure all the electrical conduits right Action : Mech/Elect-Misc. StrTarget: 2 YEARS in front of both abutment walls. Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: Status : PROPOSED EA: RecDate: 02/12/2019 EstCost: Prior to seal deck cracks with Action : Deck-Methacrylate StrTarget: 2 YEARS Methacrylate. Contractors need to clean Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: and patch all deck spalls. Status : PROPOSED EA: RecDate: 02/20/2015 EstCost: Remove debris at pier wall 3 easterly end Action : Scour-Place Counterm StrTarget: 2 YEARS that was accumulated in the front 10.0 Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: feet wide and 5.0 feet deep. Status : PROPOSED EA: Remove the tree that is laying down at easterly end of pier wall #3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location 30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep. RecDate: 10/04/1995 EstCost: Replace the deteriorated Type A joints Action : Joints-Repair/Clean StrTarget: 2 YEARS seal as follows: Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget: Status : PROPOSED EA: South Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. Pier wall 2: Width of joint is 0.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. Pier wall 3: Width of joint is 1.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. Pier wall 4: Width of joint is 0.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. North Abutment: Width of joint is 1.15 inch at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit. P ' City Council 23 — 126 8/4/2026 Page 5 of 6 Team Leader : Nelson N. Vo vv, fE J N IT 2 q( Report Author Nelson N. Vo c`� Edwin .y Inspected By NN.Vo/E.Mah c; Mah v �^ w *^ No. 27141 �O � 03/31/2021 3/19/2021 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date) �l4 �Np tF of CPV�E�� P ' City Council 23 — 127 8/4/2026 Page 6 of 6 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT EXHIBIT 2 **++++++++++++++ IDENTIFICATION +++++**++++++++ *****+++++++**++++++++++++++++++++++++****+++++ SUFFICIENCY RATING = 92.4 (1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA 069 (8) STRUCTURE NUMBER 55CO047 PAINT CONDITION INDEX N/A = (5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)- ON 150000000 (2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT 12 (3) COUNTY CODE 059 (4) PLACE CODE 69000 ************* CLASSIFICATION ************* CODE (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED- SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL (112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- YES Y (7) FACILITY CARRIED- FLOWER ST (104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- NOT ON NHS 0 (9) LOCATION- 0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- LOCAL URBAN 19 (11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT 0 (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- NOT STRAHNET 0 (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- NOT ON NET 0 (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- NONE EXISTS N (13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2 WAY 2 (16) LATITUDE 33 DEG 46 MIN 13.83 SEC (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE- (17) LONGITUDE 117 DEG 52 MIN 33.61 SEC (105) FED.LANDS HWY- NOT APPLICABLE 0 (98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE o SHARE (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - NOT ON NET 0 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER (20) TOLL- ON FREE ROAD 3 (21) MAINTAIN- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 ******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL ********* (22) OWNER- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY 04 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL- CONCRETE (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- NOT ELIGIBLE 5 TYPE- TEE BEAM CODE 104 (44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL- OTHER/NA **************** CONDITION **************** CODE TYPE- OTHER/NA CODE 000 (58) DECK 5 (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 4 (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0 (60) SUBSTRUCTURE 7 (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- CIP CONCRETE CODE 1 (61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 (108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM: (62) CULVERTS N A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- CONCRETE CODE 1 ********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- NONE CODE 0 (31) DESIGN LOAD- M-18 OR H-20 4 C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- NONE CODE 0 (63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- (LRFR) LD & RES FA 8 *************** AGE AND SERVICE *************** (64) OPERATING RATING- RF= 1.48 (27) YEAR BUILT 1930 (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- (LRFR) LD & RES FP 8 (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 0000 (66) INVENTORY RATING- RF= 1.10 (42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN 5 (70) BRIDGE POSTING- EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS 5 UNDER- WATERWAY 5 (41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A (28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 02 UNDER STRUCTURE 00 (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 5500 DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION (30) YEAR OF ADT 2021 (109) TRUCK ADT 1 **************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 7 *************** GEOMETRIC DATA **************** (68) DECK GEOMETRY 5 (48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 11.0 M (69) UNDERCLEARAHCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL H (49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 44.5 M (71) WATER ADEQUACY 8 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 8 (51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 12.0 M (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1110 (52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 15.8 M (113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES 8 (32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 19.8 l] ********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ********** (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- NO MEDIAN 0 (75) TYPE OF WORK- CODE (34) SKEW 45 DEG (35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO (76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT M (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 TI (94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 12.0 M (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M (96) TOTAL PROJECT COST (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- NOT H/RR 0.00 l9 (97) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- NOT H/RR 0.0 M (114) FUTURE ADT 10688 (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR IT 0.0 M (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 *************** NAVIGATION DATA *************** *************** INSPECTIONS *************** (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- NOT APPLICABLE CODE N (90) INSPECTION DATE 02/21 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO (111) PIER PROTECTION- CODE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE (92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE 0.0 M A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B) (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C) P City Council 23 — 128 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 California Department of Transportation Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance and Investigations BRIDGE NSPECTION CORDS NFORMATION SYSTEM The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS. These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual. Records for "Confidential" bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. City Council 23 — 129 8/4/2026 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Mainte BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT 4r* _ EX_H�B�T2 Routine Inspectionaffim_w -- BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE: 55C0365 SANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL February 6, 2023 BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION (9)LOCATION 100' E/O FLOWER ST (7)FACILITY CARRIED MACARTHUR BLVD (11)POSTMILE 0 (6)FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTAANA DELHI CHANNEL (16)LATITUDE 33°41'59.57" (5)INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000 (17)LONGITUDE 117°52'36.38" (104)ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION (58)DECK N N/A(NBI) DECK AREA(M)2 311 (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE N N/A(NBI) SUFFICIENCY RATING 68.9 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE N N/A(NBI) PAINT CONDITION N/A (62)CULVERT 6 DETERIORATION STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT(SD)STATUS NOT SD (67)STRUCTURE EVALUATION 6 EQUAL MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION A4 Routine-Roadway View(02/20/2019) Routine-Elevation View(02/20/2019) R Routine-Underside View(02/20/2019) TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo o QR13FESS/0,yq� REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo Edwin Mah INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah No. 27141 jO Exp. 03/31/2025 9/11/2023 CI V I L Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) Date tE `FD�P City Council 23 — 130 4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations STRUCTUREOVERVIEW AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION (1)STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069 (90)INSPECTION DATE 02/23(91)FREQUENCY 24 MO (2)HIGHWAY DISTRICT 12 (92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE (3)COUNTY CODE (55)ORANGE A)NSTM INSP N-NO MO A) N/A (4)PLACE CODE (69000)SANTA ANA B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A (21)MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI C)OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A (22)OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI (98)BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE N/A (99)BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (27) YEAR BUILT 1971 (45)MAIN SPANS 3 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 1: CONCRETE (106)YEAR MODIFIED N/A (46)APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 19: CULVERT (34)SKEW 0 (48)MAX SPAN(M) 3.4 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (49)LENGTH (M) 11 (35)STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112)NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 0 NO.OF HINGES 0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Triple(11.00 feet W x 11.00 feet H x 95.00 feet L) RC box culvert(grade top). The top of the culvert is the wearing surface. SPAN CONFIGURATION (W)3 @ 11.00 feet(E). OPERATIONAL INFORMATION LOAD CAPACITY (31)DESIGN LOAD 0 UNKNOWN (65)CALC METHOD 0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG. (66)INVENTORY RATING RF=0.75=>24.3 metric tons (63)CALC METHOD 0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG. (64)OPERATING RATING RF=1.25=>40.5 metric tons (70)BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS (41)STRUCTURE STATUS A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING PPPPP OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches POSTING LOADS Safe Existing Posting Loads Ordinance/Order Signs Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons NONE Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Speed 40 N/A N/A MPH Additional Signs NONE Posting Date N/A Load Rating Summary Date 11/29/18 Load Rating Type Assigned Culvert Load Rating Tool-Date SMI Inspection Procedure Manual Section 5.10- 10/26/18 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53)MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54)MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M City Council 23 — 131 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the culvert to inspect all visible elements of the culvert structure. Culvert deck was inspected by walking on sidewalk. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the culvert. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. Rain boots maybe needed if it is in raining season. There is about 4.0 inches deep of water inside barrel 2 only(center span). REVISIONS The rail code is changed from 0000 to NNNN. DECK AND ROADWAY There are random transverse hairline cracks up to 0.06 inches wide and 12.0 to 18.0 inches in spacing. The work-recommendation has been made to seal all the deck cracks on 03/02/2007 but it is not done. The northerly sidewalk has longitudinal and map cracks up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long. The bottom face of the top slab has few longitudinal and transverse cracks, at the west barrel with white efflorescence at the middle and the northerly end. One section of metal picket fence was damaged by vehicular impacts at the southwest quadrant of the westerly abutment on eastbound approach. AC Roadway has cracks and settlement up to 2.0 inches. CULVERT Culvert wall 4 (east)has an incipient spall at(16.0 inches L s 14.0 inches W)at the top of the northerly end. (see the attached photo 3). The work-recommendation has been made to patch this spall on 02/24/2017 but it is not done. Sediment has been accumulating at the southerly end, up to 12.0 inches thick. In addition ,there are two piles of debris inside barrels 1 and 3 up to 12.0 thick of mud. The following is the locations of culvert walls with cracks: Culvert wall 1 (west wall)has a horizontal crack, 0.03 inches wide 1.0 to 3.0 feet long at northerly half of the wall. Culvert wall 2 has five vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide and 2.0 to 5.0 feet long. Culvert wall 3 has seven vertical cracks up to 0.06 inches wide 3.0 to 6.0 feet long. Culvert wall 4 (east)has a horizontal crack 0.05 inches wide and 30.0 feet long at the northerly end approximately 5.0 feet above the invert. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 11/29/2018 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 11/29/2018. SPECIAL • • STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. City Council 23 — 132 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 3 of 5 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations DECK AND ROADWAY DECK CROSS SECTION (N)0.70 feet headwall w/metal picket fence on top,4.30 feet sw,44.00 feet,4.50 feet cu med, 34.00 feet,4.30 feet sw, 0.70 feet headwall w/metal picket fence(S). DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION (49) LENGTH 11.0 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 23.8 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 28.2 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE&SUBRTE 000000000000 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.3 M RIGHT 1.3 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 1-ROUTE ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 23.8 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 3 CLOSED IVIED W/BARRIERS (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE 0-NONE (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 13.4 M B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE 0-NONE (68) DECK GEOMETRY 2 INTOLERABLE-REPLACE C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE (72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT OVERLAY THICKNESS(inches) 0 inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 34000 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (30) YEAR OF ADT 2021 (109) TRUCK ADT% 1 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (28a) LANES 7 (114) FUTURE ADT 64343 SPEED 40 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE (58) DECK RATING=N JOINT APPROACH RAIL RAIL INFORMATION (36a)Rail Code N (36b)Transition N (36c)Appr Guardrail N (36d)Appr Guardrail End N Roadway Speed 40 MPH JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES -NONE SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES -NONE (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= N SUBSTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V-H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A (71) WATER ADEQUACY 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (61) CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M (113) SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M SCOUR POA DATE N/A CHANNEL DESCRIPTION Natural earth trapezoidal with rock slopes. SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (62)CULVERT RATING= 6 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 241 Culvert-RC 2 87 m 51 30 6 0 City Council 23 — 133 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (62)CULVERT RATING= 6 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 3 0 2 1 0 1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining 2 3 0 3 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 30 0 25 5 0 (241)Culvert-RC Cracks and spalls. (241-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area Culvert wall 4 (east)has an incipient spall at(16.0 inches L X 14.0 inches W)at the top of the northerly end. (see the attached photo 3). (241-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining The bottom face of the top slab has few longitudinal and transverse cracks, at the west barrel with white efflorescence at the middle and the northerly end. (241-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The following is the locations of culvert walls with cracks: Culvert wall 1 (west wall)has a horizontal crack, 0.03 inches wide at northerly half of the wall. Culvert wall 2 has five vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide. Culvert wall 3 has seven vertical cracks up to 0.06 inches wide. Culvert wall 4 (east)has a horizontal crack 0.05 inches wide, 30.0 feet long at the northerly end approximately 5.0 feet above the invert. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 03/02/2007 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Methacrylate Str Target ROUTINE EA Clean and seal the moderate and severe cracks at the the culvert concrete top slab by coating the bridge deck with methacrylate. JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/02/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Railing-Misc. Str Target ROUTINE EA Repair the section of metal picket fence was damaged by vehicular impacts at the southwest quadrant of the westerly abutment on eastbound approach. Rec Date 02/02/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Appr. Roadway-Repair Str Target ROUTINE EA Repave the AC Roadway at the approach and departure lanes due to cracks, potholes and settlement. SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/24/2017 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Sub-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Remove, clean and patch culvert wall 4 (east)that exhibits incipient spall (16 inches L x 14 inches W)at the top of the norther) end. see the attached photo 3 OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE City Council 23 — 134 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 5 of 5 55C0365/AAAN/102828 EXHIBIT 2 California Department of Transportation Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance and Investigations BRIDGE NSPECTION CORDS NFORMATION SYSTEM The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS. These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual. Records for "Confidential" bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. City Council 23 — 135 8/4/2026 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Mainte BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT A* ExHiBiT2 Routine Inspectionawwww -- BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE: 55C0163 SANTA ANA RIVER February 6, 2023 BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION (9)LOCATION 0.4 MI W/O FAIRVIEW ST (7)FACILITY CARRIED MCFADDEN AVENUE (11)POSTMILE 0 (6)FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTAANA RIVER (16)LATITUDE 33°44'14.62" (5)INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000 (17)LONGITUDE 117°54'47.23" (104)ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION (58)DECK 7 GOOD DECK AREA(M)2 2,266 (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 78.2 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A (62)CULVERT N N/A(NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT(SD)STATUS NOT SD (67)STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 7 COUNTERMEASURES PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION _ A AMA. 1 Routine-Roadway View(02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View(02/13/2019) L !, Routine-Underside View(02/13/2019) TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo o QR13FESS/0,yq� REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo Edwin Mah INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah No. 27141 jO Exp. 03/31/2025 9/11/2023 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) Date tE `FD�P City Council 23 — 136 4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations STRUCTUREOVERVIEW AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION (1)STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069 (90)INSPECTION DATE 02/23(91)FREQUENCY 24 MO (2)HIGHWAY DISTRICT 12 (92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE (3)COUNTY CODE (55)ORANGE A)NSTM INSP N-NO MO A) N/A (4)PLACE CODE (69000)SANTA ANA B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A (21)MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI C)OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A (22)OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI (98)BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE N/A (99)BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (27) YEAR BUILT 1964 (45)MAIN SPANS 7 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT (106)YEAR MODIFIED 1977 (46)APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04:TEE BEAM (34)SKEW 36 (48)MAX SPAN(M) 16.5 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (49)LENGTH (M) 106.7 (35)STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112)NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 5 NO.OF HINGES 2 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder(9 each)with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported on concrete piles. SPAN CONFIGURATION Original (EB lanes): (W)40.00 feet, 5 @ 54.00 feet,40.00 feet(E). 1-Widened north side(WB lanes): (W) 53.00 feet, 5 @ 54.00 feet, 53.00 feet(E). 2-widening 9 inches from the south side. OPERATIONAL INF• ' • LOAD CAPACITY (31)DESIGN LOAD 5 MS 18(HS 20) (65)CALC METHOD 1 LF LOAD FACTOR (66)INVENTORY RATING RF=1.12=>36.3 metric tons (63)CALC METHOD 1 LF LOAD FACTOR (64)OPERATING RATING RF=1.85=>59.9 metric tons (70)BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS (41)STRUCTURE STATUS A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING PPPPP OVERLAY THICKNESS 1 inches POSTING LOADS Safe Existing Posting Loads Ordinance/Order Signs Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons NONE Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Speed 45 N/A N/A MPH Additional Signs NONE Posting Date N/A Load Rating Summary Date 04/05/2013 Load Rating Type Calculated Load Rating Tool-Date BDS- 10/07/82 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53)MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54)MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M City Council 23 — 137 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge with binoculars. There is no need for special equipment to inspect this structure. Probably, rain boots are needed if there is water inside the channel. The channel is dry . DECK AND ROADWAY Bridge deck has a Polyester Concrete Overlay. The soffit spalls as the following locations below: At span 1, there are two spalls at(9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D)with exposed and rusted rebars approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside bay 8 (southerly bay). At span 6, there is a spall at(24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D)at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside bay 5(see the attached photo no. 3). The soffit cracks as the following locations below: The soffit of the northerly bays has three longitudinal and transverse cracks(up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long)with efflorescence. The soffit of spans 1 to 5 and 7(only at the southerly 3 bays of the original bridge) has several transverse cracks(up to 0.05 inches wide and 8.0 to 12.0 inches long)with efflorescence. At span 6 of the original bridge, there are few transverse cracks at 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long with white efflorescence. There are longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long scattering on both of the bridge sidewalk; and also, numerous small spalls with exposed rebars and rusted inside the face of bridge railings. Joint-Strip Seal Expansion is inside westerly abutment joint, lanes 1 and 2 on westbound. On westbound, there are two broken pieces of strip seal inside the easterly abutment joint location. Joint seal is not visible on eastbound at both abutment joint locations(westerly and easterly abutments)because of AC roadway covering at both approach and depart lanes. Both hinges have type A pourable seal with 2.0 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit. There are longitudinal cracks(up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long)on both bridge sidewalks. SUPERSTRUCTURE The following is the locations of spalls on girders: At span 1 (westerly side), girders 5 and 6, each has a spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)right at the middle of the span. At span 6, girder 9 has a spall at(2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 10.0 feet from the westerly side of pier wall 7. At span 7(see the attached photo no.4) Girder 1 has a spall at(3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 6.0 feet from the pier wall. Girder 8 has a spall at(8.0 inches L x 10.0 inches W x 1.5 inches D)at the middle of the span, northerly face. Girder 9(southerly side)has a spall about(3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 8.0 feet from the pier wall. There are three concrete small spalls about(3.0 inches L x 3.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)in the most southerly girder of the most easterly span; and also, at the easterly span girder 2 (counting from south)has a spall at(6.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)at mid-span. Span 7, Southerly girder has several vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long at the easterly end. SUBSTRUCTURE Each pier wall has at least two vertical cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide, 10.0 to 15.0 feet long and 6.0 to 8.0 feet in spacing). There is graffiti on bridge abutment and pier walls. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The loadrating City Council 23 - 138 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 3 of 7 55C0163/AAAM/102828 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations -xv- CONDITION INFORMATION INSPECTION COMMENTARY summary sheet is archived on 04/05/2013. SPECIAL • N INFORMATIO STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. DECK AND ROADWAY DECK CROSS SECTION (S) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 52.00 feet, 5.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br(N). DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION (49) LENGTH 106.7 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 16.6 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 2O.3 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE&SUBRTE (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 17.4 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 NO MEDIAN (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE 2-INTEGRAL CONC. (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 16.6 M B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE 0-NONE (68) DECK GEOMETRY 5 ABOVE TOLERABLE C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE (72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 6 EQUAL MIN CRITERIA OVERLAY THICKNESS(inches) 1 inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 22000 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (30) YEAR OF ADT 2021 (109) TRUCK ADT% 1 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 3 KM (28a) LANES 4 (114) FUTURE ADT 38479 SPEED 45 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 16 Top Flange-RC 2 2166 sq.m 1965 200 1 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 0 1 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 200 0 200 0 0 511 Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete 2 1728 sq.m 1728 0 0 0 (16-1080)Delamination/Spall/Patched Area The soffit spalls as the following locations below: At span 1,there are two spalls at(9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D)with exposed rebars and rusted approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside bay 8 (southerly bay). At span 6,there is a spall at(24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D)at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside bay 5(see the attached photo no. 3). (16-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The soffit cracks as the following locations below: The soffit of the northerly bays has three longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long with white efflore nc Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations -XHIBIT DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (16-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The soffit of spans 1 to 5 and 7 (only at the southerly 3 bays of the original bridge)has several transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with white efflorescence. At span 6 of the original bridge,there are few transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with white efflorescence. (16-511)Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete Bridge deck has a Polyester Concrete Deck Overlay. JOINT - APPROACH . RAIL INFORMATION (36a)Rail Code 1 (36b)Transition 0 (36c)Appr Guardrail 0 (36d)Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 45 MPH JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES _ Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 300 Joint-Strip Seal Exp 2 25 m 24 0 1 0 2330 Seal Damage(Joints) 2 1 0 0 1 0 (300-2330)Seal Damage(Joints) Joint seal runs across all lanes of westbound with three holes at 2.0 inches wide at the easterly abutment(see the attached photo no. 2). 301 Joint-Pourable Seal 2 25 m 25 0 0 0 (301)Joint-Pourable Seal There were no significant defects noted. 304 Joint-Open Expansion 2 130 m 130 0 0 0 (304)Joint-Open Expansion Along the original edge of deck and the widening edge of deck with Type A Seal. 331 Railing-RC 2 107 m 102 5 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 5 0 5 0 0 (331-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) There are longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long scattering on both of the bridge sidewalk. 333 Railing-Other 2 107 m 97 10 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 5 0 5 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 5 0 5 0 0 (333)Railing-Other There were no significant defects noted. (333-1080)Delamination/Spall/Patched Area There are longitudinal and transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide scattering on both of bridge sidewalks. (333-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) There are numerous small spalls with exposed rebars and rusted inside the face of bridge railings. SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 1000 m 995 3 2 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 4 0 2 2 0 1130 Cracking(RC and Other) 2 1 0 1 0 0 City Council 2:3 — Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (110-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area The following is the locations of spalls on girders: At span 1 (westerly side), girders 5 and 6, each has a spall at(2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the middle of the span. At span 6, girder 9 has a spall at(2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 10.0 feet from the westerly side of pier wall 7. At span 7(see the attached photo no.4) Girder 1 has a spall at(3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 6.0 feet from the pier wall. Girder 8 has a spall at(8.0 inches L x 10.0 inches W x 1.5 inches D)at the middle of the span, northerly face. Girder 9(southerly side)has a spall about(3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)approximately 8.0 feet from the pier wall. There are three concrete small spalls about(3.0 inches L x 3.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) in the most southerly girder of the most easterly span; and also, at the easterly span girder 2(counting from south)has a spall at(6.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) at mid-span. (110-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) Span#7, Southerly girder has few vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide at the easterly end. 182 EQ Restrainer Cable-Other 2 8 ea. 8 0 0 0 (182)EQ Restrainer Cable-Other There were no significant defects noted. 312 Bearing-Enclosed 2 2 each 2 0 0 0 (312)Bearing-Enclosed There were no significant defects noted. SUBSTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL 0: NO CONTROL (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V-H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A (71) WATER ADEQUACY 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (61) CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M (113) SCOUR 7 COUNTERMEASURES (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M SCOUR POA DATE N/A CHANNEL DESCRIPTION RC trapezoidal. SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 119 m 114 5 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 5 0 5 0 0 (210-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) The following is the locations of pier walls with cracks: Pier wall 2 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide at the original portion. Pier wall 3 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches at the original portion. Pier wall 4 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide. City Council 23 - Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (210-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) Pier wall 5 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide. Pier wall 6 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide. Pier wall 7 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide. 215 Abutment-RC 2 40 m 40 0 0 0 (215)Abutment-RC There were no significant defects noted. 227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 (227) Pile-RC The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/20/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Remove and clean all loose material around the following soffit spalls; and then, patch them with cement mortar. At span 1, there are two spalls at(9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D)with exposed rebars and rusted approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside Bay 8 (southerly bay). At span 6, there is a spall at(24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D)at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside Bay 5(see the attached photo no. 3). The following locations have spalls along the edge of deck(between the original and widening section)below: There is a spall at(20.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)at mid span 6 inside Bay 5 along the original soffit edge of deck and the widening portion. Along the longitudinal joint of span 1 inside Bay 5 (westerly span)has two spalls about(16.0 inches L x 16.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the southerly side. JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE City Council 23 — 142 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT 2 California Department of Transportation Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance and Investigations BRIDGE NSPECTION CORDS NFORMATION SYSTEM The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS. These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual. Records for "Confidential" bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. City Council 23 — 143 8/4/2026 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Mainte BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT A* ExHiBiT2 Routine Inspectionawwww -- BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE: 55C0689 SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL February 9, 2023 BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION (9)LOCATION 0.5 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD (7)FACILITY CARRIED FIRST STREET (11)POSTMILE 0 (6)FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL (16)LATITUDE 33°44'42.38" (5)INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 15000000 (17)LONGITUDE 117'54'40.94" (104)ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION (58)DECK 7 GOOD DECK AREA(M)2 2,734 (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 75.4 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A (62)CULVERT N N/A(NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT(SD)STATUS NOT SD (67)STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION - r-- _ Routine-Roadway View(02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View(02/13/2019) f Routine-Underside View(02/13/2019) TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo o QR13FESS/0,yq� REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo Edwin Mah INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah No. 27141 jO Exp. 03/31/2025 9/11/2023 CIVIL Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) Date tE `FD�P City Council 23 — 144 4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations STRUCTURE OVERVIEW AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION (1)STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069 (90)INSPECTION DATE 02/23(91)FREQUENCY 24 MO (2)HIGHWAY DISTRICT 12 (92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE (3)COUNTY CODE (55)ORANGE A)NSTM INSP N-NO MO A) N/A (4)PLACE CODE (69000)SANTA ANA B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A (21)MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI C)OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A (22)OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI (98)BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE N/A (99)BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (27) YEAR BUILT 2012 (45)MAIN SPANS 3 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 5: PRESTRESS CONC (106)YEAR MODIFIED N/A (46)APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 02: STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM (34)SKEW 18 (48)MAX SPAN(M) 36.6 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (49)LENGTH (M) 97.5 (35)STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112)NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 2 NO.OF HINGES 0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Three span PC/PS concrete"I"girder(10)with stay in place form on two RC pier wall and two closed end RC cantilever abutments with monolithic wingwalls supported on RC pile cap on PC/PS concrete piles. SPAN CONFIGURATION (W) 100.00 feet, 120.00 feet, 100.00 feet(E). OPERATIONAL I LOAD CAPACITY (31)DESIGN LOAD 5 MS 18(HS 20) (65)CALC METHOD AASSIGNED LFD (66)INVENTORY RATING RF=1.00=>32.4 metric tons (63)CALC METHOD A ASSIGNED LFD (64)OPERATING RATING RF=1.67=>54.1 metric tons (70)BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS (41)STRUCTURE STATUS A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING PPPPP OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches POSTING LOADS Safe Existing Posting Loads Ordinance/Order Signs Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons NONE Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S.Tons Speed 40 N/A N/A MPH Additional Signs NONE Posting Date N/A Load Rating Summary Date 04/28/15 Load Rating Type Assigned by Design LFD Load Rating Tool-Date As Built, Contract Plans-04/28/15 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53)MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54)MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56)MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M City Council 23 — 145 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations CONDITION IN • ' • INSPECTION COMMENTARY SCOPE AND ACCESS A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge with rain boots if it is in raing season. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. The channel is dry. REVISIONS The entire quantity of RC abutments ELI 215 is modified from 25 m to 35 m because the wingwalls are monolithic with the abutments. DECK AND ROADWAY There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks(up to 0.06 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing)throughout the entire deck. The metal corregated deck form covers the deck soffit. The work recommendation has been made to treat bridge deck cracks, but it is not done. There are transverse cracks with white efflorescence under both deck overhangs, on bridge deck soffit and inside closure pour. There are longitudinal cracks up to 0.05 inches wide throughout both approach and departure slabs. There are numerous small spalls at(2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) mainly inside the northerly rail at middle of the bridge. In addition, there are longitudinal cracks up to 0.05 on both sidewalks. There is debris inside strip seal gap. The northerly bridge railing was painted. SUPERSTRUCTURE At span 1, the girder 10 has two spalls(3.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)right above the bike path approximately 40.0 feet from the westerly abutment. The following is the locations of spalls due to the previous fire years ago under span 1. Girder 8, there is a spall at(15.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D)at the southerly face; and also,the bottom flange surface has a spall at 6.0 feet L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D (see the attached photos no. 1 and 2). Girder 9, there is a spall (9.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D)at the northerly face(see the attached photo no. 3). The work recommendation has been made in 2017 but it is not done. SUBSTRUCTURE Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide. Pier wall 3 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/28/2015. SPECIAL • N INFORMATIO STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE. City Council 23 — 146 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations DECK AND ROADWAY DECK CROSS SECTION (N) 1.00 foot br, 8.00 feet sw, 36.00 feet, 4.00 feet conc curb med., 3d6.00 feet, 8.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br(S). DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION (49) LENGTH 97.5 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 21.4 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 28.0 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE&SUBRTE 000000000000 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 2.4 M RIGHT 2.4 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 1-ROUTE ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 21.4 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 3 CLOSED IVIED W/BARRIERS (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE 0-NONE (47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 10.7 M B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE 0-NONE (68) DECK GEOMETRY 2 INTOLERABLE-REPLACE C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE (72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT OVERLAY THICKNESS(inches) 0 inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 30000 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (30) YEAR OF ADT 2021 (109) TRUCK ADT% 1 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD (19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM (28a) LANES 6 (114) FUTURE ADT 53226 SPEED 40 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2040 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING=7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 12 Deck-RC 2 2087 sq.m 1757 280 50 0 1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining 2 30 0 30 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 300 0 250 50 0 (12-1120)Efflorescence/Rust Staining There are random transverse cracks with white efflorescence under both deck overhang and bridge deck soffit. (12-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks(up to 0.06 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing)throughout the entire deck. JOINT APPROACH . RAIL INFORMATION (36a)Rail Code 1 (36b)Transition 0 (36c)Appr Guardrail 0 (36d)Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 40 MPH JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 300 Joint-Strip Seal Exp 2 60 m 60 0 0 0 (300)Joint-Strip Seal Exp There were no significant defects noted. 321 Approach Slab-RC 2 411 sq.m 311 80 20 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 100 0 80 20 0 (321-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) There are map cracks up to 0.06 inches wide throughout both approach and departure slabs. City Council 23 — 147 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations JOINT - APPROACH RAIL JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 331 Railing-RC 2 207 m 203 4 0 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 4 0 4 0 0 (331-1080)Delamination/Spall/Patched Area There are numerous small spalls at(2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) mainly inside the northerly rail at the middle of the bridge. In addition,there are random longitudinal sidewalk cracks up to 0.05 on both sides. SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59)SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 109 Girder/Beam-PS Conc. 2 976 m 966 0 10 0 1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 10 0 0 10 0 (109-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area At span 1,the girder 10 has two spalls (3.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D)right above the bike path approximately 40.0 feet from the westerly abutment. The following is the locations of spalls due to the previous fire years ago under span 1. Girder 8,there is a spall at(15.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D)at the southerly face; and also, the bottom flange surface has a spall at 6.0 feet L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D(see the attached photos no. 1 and 2). Girder 9,there is a spall 9.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D at the norther) face see the attached photo no. 3). 310 Bearing-Elastomeric 2 60 each 60 0 0 0 (310)Bearing-Elastomeric There were no significant defects noted. SUBSTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V-H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A (71) WATER ADEQUACY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M (61) CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 NO DEFICIENCIES (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M (113) SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M SCOUR POA DATE N/A CHANNEL DESCRIPTION Trapezoidal concrete lined. SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 210 Pier Wall-RC 2 60 m 58 2 0 0 1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 2 0 2 0 0 (210-1130)Cracking (RC and Other) Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide and 5.0 feet long. Pier wall 3 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide and 5.0 feet long. 215 Abutment-RC 2 82 m 82 0 0 0 (215)A - Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 5 of 6 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation-Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance&Investigations SUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 (215)Abutment-RC Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity. 227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0 (227) Pile-RC The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. WORK RECOMMENDATIONS DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 02/20/2019 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Methacrylate Str Target ROUTINE EA Treat deck, approach and departure slab cracks with Methacrylate. JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Rec Date 03/07/2017 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target Status PROPOSED Action Super-Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA Patch all spalls on girders 8 and 9 of span 1. SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE City Council 23 — 149 8/4/2026 Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 6 of 6 55C0689/AAAE/102830 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT VI LOCATION MAP AND BPMP PLAN PLEASE SEE BELOW City Council 23 — 150 8/4/2026 0 0o O o 00 o O oa O o 00 0 0 0 0 0 Nco a _ d is N N v � pp X o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o t o 0 0 o p 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o V o 0 0 o p wCO M O h N Ol V V O N R � OJ N O N d n v3 v> u3 F» e3 F» e3 ss LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O p O � LQ Lq � G M N V Cl! M O M N m F V O y ;E N R a m v m m roM vMi m v N M W ro V N o0 R _ O v3 e3 e» en e» ea u> v3 � o n H s r lfJ T N V � y O M M N N N C A "' A II a 22 - x i -1. a - _ - C N a ry o U a a a Z - a r a p d U U U U O U Q U U w Q a o U m 'o° ❑ ❑ o N N to t/J Y,�^) r co ❑ j O O U � > O Z O O O N O 030 0'¢L aN� O�z O�w O�Z�Z zrUi1 U W¢W U'W CL U'W¢W¢ ¢Z ¢Z¢Z Q Z Q Z¢Z¢ ¢W Z n ❑¢Z¢Z a t Z a Z¢Z Z� ¢x¢x¢x F ¢x¢x¢ N¢ U W w W W � U E o a m Z V U U U J U U. N h p a a a a a a a a a �a U C O Q J U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q �1N N _~ a U� _,z • I I • I •�� ■�.� �■�u� .�'='�WI■�Ill� �:-1►��_I ''1111 �1�� 111111111111111_ 1 '- �JII■. � m11�—� " nl�� r�!���- �� 57�li■�I�e1■1�111�11■�IIIII��� _d�"_ —�, � 1C�11111111■1111111.111�1_n r '�- '1i7■■�lilll111::::=:i��_ 1 e �1� �I��� 1''11�Iwi'�!01 r•=�• �� �� �11� 11[i�11111111111G■!71 c Er I ICI L ■gym � � ��ni, �,��1�3�1l11'��IIL�GIIIIIY�J13i n� 111� .=■■■■E NONE I V11,r.A 'N .. . I INS g-r-A. �.���',� - . _ n- 1�1l�I�■.111■.■ 5 � ....' � "' ■� NO ME y� I1111 ��w III�MEI�11111�■� —_ -- "IIIII■_ P..ONE ...►•�.•.� I ,J T�■i IIIII m_....=....fi. �.11 11 ■WWI �� ICI�111--- tl II ■■.■■■.mu_ ■■ ■� ■■. - - :_.- �' ----------■11■l..IIIL__�-.-�ti1�Er1��A11lJI n n no UII •.,tilt:,'===_=== �. _ .gip 1111'�■IllnI 11� .':■I ul0_..Ni . _L- " ' �r ��I 11111■111171■n�.0 pin, i ��1��1� ���i�1■ �iii�1111�111iii�11� =� � �� - � �W^�.�Tifil ....����■ '�I�I�IIIII��IIIIIL�� — 1 J�JI�,� r��-.1 �� 1�111111111■■-IIn � 1� � , Ir=� ►�. �`��,_ 1■�_I !11111!::Or��llll �,� ✓ I,� � �� .1. ���•� _� 1�■3=11111111��11111111111111 �1 55 � � I�IIIIIf7111�1111111 �_-��Z����� �������I��L�� p71111111H1.IW►1�111111111��� � ��`: •• ■1-_ ■onf �ui� IPr�I!lII�I"� ��� ■®■ ���. III �_�. � .. � _ I ■IIIII:! ■ � � . r o� sa,YT INN a ti 1 �w U 7 �Lr.. ,.QSZS ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT A PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION, PROPOSAL PRICING Certification - I certify that I have read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposals. I have examined the Scope of Services (Exhibit 1) and am qualified to provide services being requested as specified herein. I understand and agree that I am responsible for reporting any errors, omissions or discrepancies to the City for clarification prior to the submission of my proposal. PROPOSER'S STATEMENT: I have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions on all pages of the Request for Proposals. Upon request, I will transfer and deliver goods or services to the City in accordance with said terms and conditions. LEGAL NAME OF COMPANY PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS BUSINESS ADDRESS PRINTED NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT TITLE SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE E-MAIL ADDRESS FEDERAL ID NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER (IFAPPLICABLE) CITY OF SANTA ANA BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER (PLEASE PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE, BUT NOT REQUIRED UNTIL AND IF AN AWARD IS MADE TO PROPOSER.) THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 153 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT B PROPOSER'S STATEMENT Proposer understands and agrees that this written RFP (or any part thereof specifically designated and accepted by the City of Santa Ana, hereinafter City)shall constitute the entire agreement between proposer and the City only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Executive Director or his duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to proposer or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the proposer with the correct postage affixed thereto. Proposer further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above)of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish City all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and City's legal holidays), or the funds, check, draft, or proposer's bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the City and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by City because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered by City is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check drafts, or proposer's bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned. Proposer understands that a proposal is required for the entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the RFP schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing proposals, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. All terms contained in the specifications, the certification of nondiscrimination by contractors, and the required insurance certificates are to be incorporated by reference into this agreement and are made specifically as part of this RFP. Firm Signed and Printed Name: Title Date THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 154 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT C NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the proposer declares that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price of the proposer or any proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the proposal price, or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the proposal are true; and, further, that the proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. Note: The above non-collusion affidavit is part of the proposal. Signing this proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this non-collusion affidavit. Proposers are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of County of Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of 20 , by proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 155 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT D NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 156 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT E NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 1. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 2. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1)through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract City Council 23 — 157 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 158 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT F SUBCONTRACTOR DESIGNATION FORM Bidder acknowledges and agrees that under Public Contract Code section 4100, et seq., it must clearly set forth below the name and location of each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the bidder in or about the work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of bidder's total bid and the kind of work that each will perform. Furthermore, bidder acknowledges and agrees that under Public Contract Code section 4100, et seq., if bidder fails to list as to any portion of work, or if bidder lists more than one subcontractor to perform the same portion of work(i.e. bidder must indicate what portion of the work each subcontractor will perform), bidder must perform that portion itself or be subjected to penalty under applicable law. If alternate bids are called for and bidder intends to use subcontractors different from or in addition to those subcontractors listed for work under the base bid, bidder must list subcontractors that will perform work in an amount in excess of one half of one percent(0.5%)of bidder's total bid, including alternates. In case more than one subcontractor is named for the same kind of work, the Contractor is to state the portion of work that each subcontractor will perform. Bidders or suppliers of materials only do not need to be listed. If further space is required for the list of proposed subcontractors, additional sheets showing the required information, as indicated below, shall be attached hereto and made a part of this document. Listed below is the name of each subcontractor that will perform work, labor, or render services to the undersigned related to the work of this project.This is to include any subcontractor that will specially fabricate and install a portion of work according to detailed drawings contained in the plans and specifications in the amount greater than one half of one percent (.05%) of the contractors total bid.Additional sheets may be attached if needed. Subcontractor Name: Location: Portion of Work/Trade: Bid Amount Contractor's License Number DIR Registration No. Subcontractor Name: Location: Portion of Work/Trade: Bid Amount: Contractor's License No: DIR Registration No: Contractor will not be subcontracting any portion of work. THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 159 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). u The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Bidder's Company Name (please print or type) Signature of Bidder Print Name Title DOORS ID THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 160 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 161 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT I SAM.GOV UEI VERIFICATION On April 4, 2022, the federal government stopped using the DUNS Number to uniquely identify entities. Now, entities doing business with the federal government use the Unique Entity ID created in SAM.gov. They no longer have to go to a third-party website to obtain their identifier. This transition allows the government to streamline the entity identification and validation process, making it easier and less burdensome for entities to do business with the federal government. This RFP includes federal funding, and as such, the proposer must provide verification of their SAM.gov UEI and registration status. Please attach your entity's registration from SAM.gov, including UEI and active registration status. Proposer's UEI: SAM.gov Registration Expiration Date: City Council 23 — 162 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT J CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INEGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, as amended, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension, 2 CFR Part 2998, Subpart C, Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988, Federal Register (Pages 19160-19211), and as subsequently amended in 81 Federal Register 25585. (Before completing certification, read instructions which are an integral part of certification) 1. Pursuant to 2 CFR 180.335, the prospective primary participant, (i.e. grantee) certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: a. Are not presently excluded or disqualified; b. Have not been convicted within the preceding three years of any of the offenses listed in 2CFR 180.800(a) or had a civil judgment rendered against them for one of those offenses within that time period. c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses listed in 2 CFR 180.800(a);and d. Have not had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or default. 2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Consultant Name and Title of Official Authorized to Certify On Behalf of the Consultant Date THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 163 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA INSTRUCTION FOR CERTIFICATION 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds is providing the certification as set out below. 2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the Department of Labor(DOL) may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 3. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds learns that its certification was erroneous whom submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The terms "covered transaction", "debarment", "suspension", "disqualified," "ineligible", "lower tier covered transaction", "participant", "person", "primary covered transaction", "principal', "proposal", and "voluntarily excluded", as used in this cause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, disqualified, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the DOL. 6. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds agrees by submitting this proposal, that it will include the clause title "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction" unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. 7. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 8. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntary excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the DOL may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. City Council 23 — 164 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT K FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS — CALTRANS FORMS (Refer to the following Forms) City Council 23 — 165 8/4/2026 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIWT4210-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information Exhibit 10-I: Notice to Proposers DBE Information (federally funded projects only) The Local Public Agency(LPA) has established a DBE goal for this Contract of 4.00 % 1. TERMS AS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT • The term "Disadvantaged Business Enterprise" or"DBE" means a for-profit small business concern owned and controlled by a socially and economically disadvantaged person(s)as defined in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 26.5. • The term "Agreement" also means "Contract." • LPA also means the local entity entering into this contract with the Contractor or Consultant. • The term "Small Business" or"SB" is as defined in 49 CFR 26.65. 2. AUTHORITYAND RESPONSIBILITY A. DBEs and other small businesses are strongly encouraged to participate in the performance of Contracts financed in whole or in part with federal funds (see 49 CFR 26: Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs). The Consultant must ensure that DBEs and other small businesses have the opportunity to participate in the performance of the work that is the subject of this solicitation and should take all necessary and reasonable steps for this assurance. The proposer must not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of subcontracts. B. Proposers are encouraged to use services offered by financial institutions owned and controlled by DBEs. 3. SUBMISSION OF DBE INFORMATION If there is a DBE goal on the contract, Exhibit 10-01: Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment must be included in the Proposal. In order for a proposer to be considered responsible and responsive, the proposer must make good faith efforts to meet the goal established for the contract. If the goal is not met, the proposer must document adequate good faith efforts. All DBE participation will be counted towards meeting the contract goal; therefore, all DBE participation must be collected and reported. Exhibit 10-02: Consultant Contract DBE Information must be included in best qualified consultant's executed consultant contract. Even if no DBE participation will be reported, the successful proposer must execute and return the form. 4. DBE PARTICIPATION GENERAL INFORMATION It is the proposer's responsibility to be fully informed regarding the requirements of 49 CFR 26, and the Department's DBE program developed pursuant to the regulations. Particular attention is directed to the following: A. A DBE must be a small business firm defined pursuant to 13 CFR 121 and be certified through the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP). B. A certified DBE may participate as a prime consultant, subconsultant,joint venture partner, as a vendor of material or supplies, or as a trucking company. C. A DBE proposer not proposing as a joint venture with a non-DBE, will be required to document one or a combination of the following: 1. The proposer is a DBE and will meet the goal by performing work with its own forces. City Council 23 — 166 81 25 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIWT4210-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information 2. The proposer will meet the goal through work performed by DBE subconsultants, suppliers or trucking companies. 3. The proposer, prior to proposing, made adequate good faith efforts to meet the goal. D. A DBE joint venture partner must be responsible for specific contract items of work or clearly defined portions thereof. Responsibility means actually performing, managing, and supervising the work with its own forces. The DBE joint venture partner must share in the capital contribution, control, management, risks and profits of the joint venture commensurate with its ownership interest. E. A DBE must perform a commercially useful function pursuant to 49 CFR 26.55, that is, a DBE firm must be responsible for the execution of a distinct element of the work and must carry out its responsibility by actually performing, managing and supervising the work. F. The proposer must list only one subconsultant for each portion of work as defined in their proposal and all DBE subconsultants should be listed in the bid/cost proposal list of subconsultants. G. A prime consultant who is a certified DBE is eligible to claim all of the work in the Contract toward the DBE participation except that portion of the work to be performed by non-DBE subconsultants. 5. COUNTING DBE PARTICIPATION Materials or supplies purchased from DBEs count towards the DBE goal under the following conditions: A. If the materials or supplies are obtained from a DBE manufacturer, count 100 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies. A DBE manufacturer is a firm that operates or maintains a factory, or establishment that produces on the premises the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment required under the Contract and of the general character described by the specifications. B. If the materials or supplies purchased from a DBE regular dealer, count 60 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies. A DBE regular dealer is a firm that owns, operates or maintains a store, warehouse, or other establishment in which the materials, supplies, articles or equipment of the general character described by the specifications and required under the Contract are bought, kept in stock, and regularly sold or leased to the public in the usual course of business. To be a DBE regular dealer, the firm must be an established, regular business that engages, as its principal business and under its own name, in the purchase and sale or lease of the products in question. A person may be a DBE regular dealer in such bulk items as petroleum products, steel, cement, gravel, stone or asphalt without owning, operating or maintaining a place of business provided in this section. C. If the person both owns and operates distribution equipment for the products, any supplementing of regular dealers' own distribution equipment must be, by a long-term lease agreement and not an ad hoc or Agreement-by-Agreement basis. Packagers, brokers, manufacturers' representatives, or other persons who arrange or expedite transactions are not DBE regular dealers within the meaning of this section. D. Materials or supplies purchased from a DBE, which is neither a manufacturer nor a regular dealer, will be limited to the entire amount of fees or commissions charged for assistance in the procurement of the materials and supplies, or fees or transportation charges for the delivery of materials or supplies required on the job site, provided the fees are reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees charged for similar services 6. RESOURCES A. The CUCP database includes the certified DBEs from all certifying agencies participating in the CUCP. If you believe a firm is certified that cannot be located on the database, please err(,: DBE.Certification(o)dot.ca.gov for assistance. B. Access the CUCP database from the Department of Transportation, Office of Civil Rights website. guidance on how to search for certified firms using the CUCP database, please visit: DBE Goal Setting I Caltrans City Council 23 — 167 25 Local Assistance Procedures Manual ����� i�t 10-01 Consultant Prop t-IDS1�m�� fitment EXHIBIT 10-01 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: City of Santa Ana 2.Contract DBE Goal: 4% 3. Project Description: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight(8)bridges 4. Project Location: Various Locations in Santa Ana 5. Consultant's Name: 6. Prime Certified DBE: 7. Description of Work,Service,or Materials 8. DBE a Supplied Certification 9. DBE Contact Information 10. DBE /o Number Local Agency to Complete this Section 17. Local Agency Contract Number: 11.TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION % 18. Federal-Aid Project Number: Consultant's Ranking after Evaluation: IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on regardless of tier.Written confirmation of each listed DBE is this form is complete and accurate. required. 21. Local Agency Representative's Signature 22• Date 12. Preparer's Signature 13. Date 23. Local Agency Representative's Name 24. Phone 14. Preparer's Name 15.Phone 25. Local Agency Representative's Title 16. Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: Original—Included with consultant's proposal to local agency. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities,this document is available in alternate formats. For information call(916)654-6410 or TDD(916)654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814. LPP 18-01 Page 1 of 2 City Council 23 — 168 81*T(yZ&'2019 Local Assistance Procedures Manual ����� i�t 10-01 Consultant Prop t"IDS1�m�� fitment INSTRUCTIONS— CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT CONSULTANT SECTION 1. Local Agency- Enter the name of the local or regional agency that is funding the contract. 2. Contract DBE Goal -Enter the contract DBE goal percentage as it appears on the project advertisement. 3. Project Location -Enter the project location as it appears on the project advertisement. 4. Project Description -Enter the project description as it appears on the project advertisement(Bridge Rehab, Seismic Rehab, Overlay, Widening, etc.). 5. Consultant's Name-Enter the consultant's firm name. 6. Prime Certified DBE - Check box if prime contractor is a certified DBE. 7. Description of Work, Services, or Materials Supplied -Enter description of work, services, or materials to be provided. Indicate all work to be performed by DBEs including work performed by the prime consultant's own forces, if the prime is a DBE. If 100% of the item is not to be performed or furnished by the DBE, describe the exact portion to be performed or furnished by the DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 to determine how to count the participation of DBE firms. 8. DBE Certification Number-Enter the DBE's Certification Identification Number. All DBEs must be certified on the date bids are opened. 9. DBE Contact Information -Enter the name, address, and phone number of all DBE subcontracted consultants. Also, enter the prime consultant's name and phone number, if the prime is a DBE. 10. DBE % -Percent participation of work to be performed or service provided by a DBE. Include the prime consultant if the prime is a DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 for how to count full/partial participation. 11. Total Claimed DBE Participation % - Enter the total DBE participation claimed. If the total % claimed is less than item"Contract DBE Goal," an adequately documented Good Faith Effort(GFE) is required(see Exhibit 15-H DBE Information- Good Faith Efforts of the LAPM). 12. Preparer's Signature- The person completing the DBE commitment form on behalf of the consultant's firm must sign their name. 13. Date- Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the consultant's preparer. 14. Preparer's Name-Enter the name of the person preparing and signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 15. Phone- Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 16. Preparer's Title-Enter the position/title of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. LOCAL AGENCY SECTION 17. Local Agency Contract Number- Enter the Local Agency contract number or identifier. 18. Federal-Aid Project Number- Enter the Federal-Aid Project Number. 19. Proposed Contract Execution Date- Enter the proposed contract execution date. 20. Consultant's Ranking after Evaluation—Enter consultant's ranking after all submittals/consultants are evaluated. Use this as a quick comparison for evaluating most qualified consultant. 21. Local Agency Representative's Signature- The person completing this section of the form for the Local Agency must sign their name to certify that the information in this and the Consultant Section of this form is complete and accurate. 22. Date- Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the Local Agency Representative. 23. Local Agency Representative's Name- Enter the name of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant's DBE commitment form. 24. Phone- Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 25. Local Agency Representative Title- Enter the position/title of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant's DBE commitment form. LPP 18-01 Page 2 of 2 City Council 23 — 169 8/* 6v 2019 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EX i�t 10-02 Consultant Contract"ommrtment EXHIBIT 10-02 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: City of Santa Ana 2.Contract DBE Goal: 4% 3. Project Description: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight (8) bridges 4. Project Location: Various Locations in Santa Ana 5. Consultant's Name: 6. Prime Certified DBE: ❑ 7.Total Contract Award Amount: 8.Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: 9.Total Number of ALL Subconsultants: 10. Description of Work,Service,or Materials 11. DBE 13. DBE Supplied Certification 12. DBE Contact Information Dollar Number Amount Local Agency to Complete this Section 20. Local Agency Contract Niimhcr 14.TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION 21. Federal-Aid Project Number: 22. Contract Execution % nata. Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, this form is complete and accurate. regardless of tier.Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required. 23. Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date 15.Preparer's Signature 16. Date 25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26. Phone 17.Preparer's Name 18. Phone 27. Local Agency Representative's Title 19.Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original-Local Agency 2. Copy-Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer(DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities,this document is available in alternate formats. For information call(916)654-6410 or TDD(916)654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814. Page 1 of 2 City Council 23 — 170 814?Zb2lq,2015 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EX it t 10-02 Consultant Contract" ommitment INSTRUCTIONS— CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT CONSULTANT SECTION 1. Local Agency-Enter the name of the local or regional agency that is funding the contract. 2. Contract DBE Goal-Enter the contract DBE goal percentage as it appears on the project advertisement. 3. Project Description -Enter the project description as it appears on the project advertisement(Bridge Rehab, Seismic Rehab, Overlay, Widening, etc). 4. Project Location -Enter the project location as it appears on the project advertisement. 5. Consultant's Name -Enter the consultant's firm name. 6. Prime Certified DBE - Check box if prime contractor is a certified DBE. 7. Total Contract Award Amount-Enter the total contract award dollar amount for the prime consultant. 8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants—Enter the total dollar amount for all subcontracted consultants. SUM=(DBEs+all Non-DBEs). Do not include the prime consultant information in this count. 9. Total number of ALL subconsultants—Enter the total number of all subcontracted consultants. SUM=(DBEs+ all Non-DBEs). Do not include the prime consultant information in this count. 10.Description of Work, Services,or Materials Supplied-Enter description of work, services, or materials to be provided. Indicate all work to be performed by DBEs including work performed by the prime consultant's own forces, if the prime is a DBE. If 100% of the item is not to be performed or furnished by the DBE, describe the exact portion to be performed or furnished by the DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 to determine how to count the participation of DBE firms. 11.DBE Certification Number-Enter the DBE's Certification Identification Number. All DBEs must be certified on the date bids are opened. 12.DBE Contact Information -Enter the name, address, and phone number of all DBE subcontracted consultants. Also, enter the prime consultant's name and phone number, if the prime is a DBE. 13.DBE Dollar Amount-Enter the subcontracted dollar amount of the work to be performed or service to be provided. Include the prime consultant if the prime is a DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 for how to count full/partial participation. 14. Total Claimed DBE Participation- $: Enter the total dollar amounts entered in the "DBE Dollar Amount" column. %: Enter the total DBE participation claimed("Total Participation Dollars Claimed"divided by item"Total Contract Award Amount"). If the total% claimed is less than item"Contract DBE Goal,"an adequately documented Good Faith Effort(GFE)is required(see Exhibit 15-H DBE Information-Good Faith Efforts of the LAPM). 15. Preparer's Signature-The person completing the DBE commitment form on behalf of the consultant's firm must sign their name. 16.Date-Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the consultant's preparer. 17. Preparer's Name-Enter the name of the person preparing and signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 18. Phone-Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 19. Preparer's Title-Enter the position/title of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. LOCAL AGENCY SECTION 20.Local Agency Contract Number-Enter the Local Agency contract number or identifier. 21. Federal-Aid Project Number-Enter the Federal-Aid Project Number. 22. Contract Execution Date-Enter the date the contract was executed. 23.Local Agency Representative's Signature-The person completing this section of the form for the Local Agency must sign their name to certify that the information in this and the Consultant Section of this form is complete and accurate. 24.Date-Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the Local Agency Representative. 25.Local Agency Representative's Name-Enter the name of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant's DBE commitment form. 26. Phone-Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 27.Local Agency Representative Title-Enter the position/title of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant's DBE commitment form. Page 2 of 2 City Council 23 — 171 814?Zb27q,2015 q 0 EXHIBIT 3 low �.� BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM R F P NO. 25-081 A PROPOSAL _i i i SUBMITTED BY: J§DOKKEN A ENGINEERING Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE Project Manager 1450 Frazee Road, Suite 100 SUBMITTED TO: San Diego, CA 92108 ALEXANDRU BANGEAN, PE (858) 514-8377 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER ghoxmeier@dokkenengineering.com CITY OF SANTA ANA - M-36 20 ClYff C WTIRR PLAZA 23 - 172 W$MUC&D ON: SANTA ANA, CA 92701 July 8, 2025 EXHIBIT 2 19 DOKKEN ENGINEERING Ti-ansportation Solutionsfirom Concept to Constniction July 8,2025 DOKKEN ENGINEERING CONTACT Mr.Alexandru Bangean,Senior Civil Engineer Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE I Project Manager City of Santa Ana—M-36 Address: 1450 Frazee Road,Suite 100 20 Civic Center Plaza San Diego, CA 92108 Santa Ana,CA 92701 Telephone: (858)514-8377 RE: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Fax: (858)514-8608 BPMP RFP No.25-081A Mobile: (541)602-2960 E-Mail: ghoxmeier@dokkenengineering.com Dear Mr. Bangean: We are excited to grow our relationship with the City of Santa Ana. We have worked with many cities and agencies including City of Palm Desert, City of Carlsbad, Orange County,Tulare County and others where we have demonstrated our ability to deliver similar projects on schedule and on budget. We have a strong history of urban projects and understand the needs of the area. Dokken Engineering (Dokken) is pleased to submit to the City one (1) hard copy and one (1) digital copy of our proposal to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program. We wish to express our enthusiasm and commitment to deliver this proposal. Dokken has teamed with Burne Engineering to support engineering services, Geocon Consultants Inc. for Hazardous Materials Investigations and Optime Consulting Group for bridge deck testing to deliver a solution that meets the City's needs, complying with Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans Local Assistance Requirements. PROJECT EXPERIENCE I We have extensive recent experience completing Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) projects similar to the City's proposed improvements. Dokken has been working with the City of Carlsbad on BPMP since 2016, including PS&E for preventative maintenance of the Calle Barcelona Pedestrian Overcrossing,Jefferson Street Bridge, El Camino Real Bridge among other bridges involving methacrylate deck overlays. We are providing additional engineering services for Orange County, Tulare County and the City of Palm Desert for bridge maintenance projects that also include methacrylate overlay and additional bridge preventive maintenance work. Burne Engineering has joined our team to supplement our experience and expertise having recently completed PS&E for Calaveras County with similar BPMP efforts. Our combined experience will be key for the success and delivery of this project. The key staff and subconsultants proposed for this project have worked on similar recently completed HBP BPMP projects. Their collective understanding and experience with the HBP and Caltrans Local Assistance will ensure the project is delivered in full compliance with the program and participating funding is maximized. Their experience working in urban areas will be an additional asset to provide a more succinct design meeting the needs of the City as well as the motorists and users within the project area. PROJECT MANAGEMENT I Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE will lead the project delivery team as the Project Manager. Gabriel has experience managing design teams for PS&E packages for many cities. He is well versed in coordinating with, State agencies, Counties and Cities. He has experience ensuring the projects meet the federal and state requirements for local agencies to meet funding and application requirements. Gabriel provides local agencies with scheduling and project management services, ensuring the project schedule is maintained, and all submittals are made in full compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance and the HBP program. PROJECT APPROACH I The Dokken team has visited and researched the project sites and reviewed the bridge inspection reports to develop an approach to best deliver this project for the City. Based on the recommendations in the most recent bridge inspection reports, it is anticipated that work is to be performed both on the bridge deck as well as on the substructure or girders. Bridge deck work includes applying methacrylate to the deck surfaces and replacing joint seals. Substructure and girder work includes spall repair, cleaning and painting of steel components and debris removal. City Council 23 — 11 73 9W4 026 EXHIBIT 2 DOKKEN ENGINEERING Bridge deck work will require staged signing and traffic handling to maintain traffic operations during construction. Performing work underneath the bridge will utilize encroachment and environmental permits to allow construction access and work to be performed within the channels. Based on parcel data available, river and creek channels are within either City, Orange County Flood Control District or County Right-of-Way. Additionally, we anticipate that signage and partial roadway closures will encroach into Caltrans Right-of-Way. This stresses the importance of communication with all shareholders and early identification and resolution of potential issues early to maintain schedule. We have identified key project issues and solutions from a wholistic approach to ensure we meet the needs and goals of the City and all other shareholders. A top priority is to ensure we are meeting the federal and state requirements,frequent communication with all parties, identifying key issues and solutions early,to ensure the project stays on schedule. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS I Bridge Preventative Maintenance may imply routine or basic work; however, we still look for opportunities to innovate regardless of the scope of work. We believe the importance of brainstorming and evaluating alternative solutions of how work can be performed to explore innovative concepts to avoid pre-packaged solutions. Some examples may include: • Group separate bid packages for bridges based on similar scope and schedule to expedite project completion. • Specify unconventional construction methods to eliminate major environmental and ROW impacts. • Allow for detours,or night closures to expedite and simplify construction. Dokken Engineering's mission is to provide superior service to our clients for all their transportation and related civil engineering needs. We strive to be responsive and flexible to our clients, which results in projects being delivered on time and within budget. We appreciate your consideration of our proposal, and we are very excited for this opportunity to work with the City of Santa Ana. Sincerely, DOKKEN ENGINEERING Gabriel HoxmeZr� John A.Kle/munes,Jr., PE Project Manager President City Council 23 - 11 7C &4/2026 Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A TABLE OF CONTENTS ServicesProvided ........................................................................................................................................................... AgreementStatement ................................................................................................................................................... Firmand Team Experience ............................................................................................................................................. • Project Organization Chart ........................................................................................................................................ 11 • Resumes for Key Personnel ....................................................................................................................................... 12 ProposedWork Plan...................................................................................................................................................... 21 References.................................................................................................................................................................... 27 CARBFleet Compliance ................................................................................................................................................. 29 Attachments • Attachment A: Proposer's Certification, Proposal Pricing • Attachment B: Proposer's Statement • Attachment C: Non-Collusion Affidavit • Attachment D: Non-Lobbying Certification • Attachment E: Non-Discrimination Certification • Attachment F:Subcontractor Designation Form • Attachment G:CARB Fleet Compliance Certification • Attachment H:Statement Regarding Community Workforce Agreement(CWA) Requirements • Attachment I:SAM.gov UEI Verification • Attachment J:Certificate Regarding Debarment,Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion • Attachment K: Federal Funding Requirements—Caltrans Forms �]'ONKE N 23 — 175 TABL&4QQ2&s ENGINEERING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A SERVICES PROVIDED TASK 1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT(30% PLANS) Task 1.1 Project Coordination Dokken Engineering's project management will include regular virtual meetings, in-person deliveries, presentation of work products, development and monitoring of action items, monthly progress reports, work progress monitoring, budget monitoring,coordination and communication. Monthly Project Delivery Team (PDT) meetings will be held with City staff and other representatives,as necessary,to discuss work progress,decisions made,schedule and considerations for the City. The Dokken Project Manager will work closely with the City Project Manager and continuously inform the City Project Manager of all project activities. The duration of the project management effort is expected to be continuous through completion of the job. Project management will include: leading, directing and monitoring the Dokken team; preparing for, attending,and documenting team meetings and action items;preparing,coordinating,and maintaining a critical path method schedule; preparing monthly progress reports, invoices and specific work completed; and miscellaneous coordination and support. Coordination—Close contact will be maintained between the Dokken Project Manager, all subconsultants,the City Project Manager, project personnel, and regulatory agencies.The Dokken Project Manager will act as the principal liaison between the City and staff at Dokken. Communication — Effective communication through in-person visits, focused meetings, telephone calls and a-mails to the City will be performed to discuss specific project issues by the Project Manager. Regular communication with team members, the City and other agency personnel will be facilitated through the Dokken Project Manager. Progress reports will be submitted monthly to the City.These reports will include the work performed during that period, a discussion of issues/decisions, recommendations to address issues, budget status, and anticipated work for the following month. The progress report will be submitted with the monthly invoice. Dokken's Project Manager is responsible for maintaining cost control for each task, including our subconsultants. Project Schedule-Dokken will provide and maintain a detailed Milestone Schedule for the bridge and a less detailed program wide Microsoft Project Schedule.The Milestone Schedule is a simple one page schedule to assist in project communication Dokken's Project Manager will closely monitor the schedules and discuss updates with the City Project Manager. Task 1.1 Deliverables:Monthly Progress Report and Invoice;Meeting Agendas and Minutes;Action Item Lists;RFA and HBP Funding Support Information;Project Schedule TASK 1.2 RECORDS RESEARCH Dokken Engineering will research all information pertinent to the project such as existing field conditions, as-built plans and record drawings right-of-way and parcel data, and all future improvement plans adjacent to or affecting the project site. Dokken Engineering will identify all existing and proposed facilities within the project limits and potential conflicts. TASK 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Task 1.3.1 Preliminary Environmental Study(PES) Dokken will prepare a draft PES Form and will coordinate with Caltrans to setup a field review prior to approval of the PES Forms.The PES Form will include an environmental study area map as well as an environmental constraints analysis to identify key environmental impacts that could occur during construction. Once the draft PES Form is completed, it will be reviewed by the City and Caltrans. The PES form will outline the recommended federal environmental documentation, technical studies,surveys,approvals, agency coordination,and permits required for the Project. Task 1.3.1 Deliverables:Preliminary Environmental Study TASK 1.3.2 Field Investigations and Hazardous Material Surveys Geocon will assess each of the eight bridge locations(the sites)within the City. TASK 1.3.2.1 Phase I Initial Site Assessment(ISA) Dokken Engineering's sub consultant,Geocon,will perform an Initial Site Assessment(ISA)will be to determine the potential presence of environmental concerns and contaminated properties at the sites that may impact maintenance at each location. The primary purpose of the ISA is to assess the sites for the potential presence of recognized environmental conditions(RECs) (i.e., levels of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products warranting regulatory cleanup action) and the uses and conditions at properties and facilities in the site vicinities with the potential to cause(or have caused)an REC at the sites. For the purposes of this ISA,the "vicinity' of the sites is defined as properties/facilities within 1 8 mile of the sites.The ISA will r'111)ONNE N 23 - 176 8/4/2®AW1 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A be performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) Designation E 1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process. Potential environmental concerns and contaminated properties that are determined to potentially pose a significant impact to the planned improvements would be further evaluated during a subsequent(Phase II) Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI). As part of the Phase I ISA,Geocon will perform the following services including: • Perform a reconnaissance of the sites to assess for the presence,or make visual observations of indicators of the potential presence, of RECs on the sites. These indicators may include 55-gallon drums, underground and aboveground storage tanks, chemical containers, waste storage and disposal areas, industrial facilities, discolored surficial soils, electrical transformers that may contain polychlorinated biphenyls, and areas conspicuously absent of vegetation. If access is unavailable to any portions of the sites, our ability to complete the assessment described herein may be hindered. Assessment of the sites for wetlands, asbestos-containing building materials, lead-containing paint, lead in drinking water, radon, methane gas, and naturally occurring substances such as arsenic and asbestos are not included in the ISA services. • Perform a visual survey of adjoining and adjacent properties from the sites and from public thoroughfares to observe general types of land use and conditions surrounding the sites. • Review the Standard Environmental Records Sources: Federal and State as referenced in ASTM Designation E 1527-21 to obtain information regarding the potential presence of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products on the sites or on properties within the approximate minimum search distance specified for each source, reviewing reasonably ascertainable regulatory agency files for the sites and documented hazardous substance and/or petroleum product release locations near the sites.The sources for these files could include the local department of environmental health, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. • Review pertinent and reasonably ascertainable information sources to evaluate physiographic, geologic, and hydrogeologic conditions in the vicinity of the sites. • Review and interpret reasonably ascertainable historical aerial photographs to obtain information concerning the historical use of the sites and adjacent properties. • Review historical United States Geological Survey topographic maps to obtain information relative to the topography of the sites,as well as previous development and uses of the sites and properties located in the vicinity of the sites. • Review documents provided by the Client. Potentially useful documents may include geotechnical, geologic, and environmental reports,site plans, plot plans,and correspondence with regulatory agencies. • Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the ISA for the sites and qualitatively describing existing, or the potential for, RECs on the sites. TASK 1.3.2.2 Phase II Preliminary Site Investigation(PSI)Report (OPTIONAL) Should the results of the Phase I ISA determine that additional testing is necessary, Dokken Engineering's sub consultant, Geocon,will perform a Phase II testing and Site Investigation Report(PSI).The purpose of the Phase II PSI is to preliminarily characterize hazardous materials that may be encountered during construction.The findings will be used to evaluate material disposal options and worker health and safety.The specific scope of the Phase II PSI should be determined after completion of the Phase I ISA and after the 30%design submittal is complete.The PSI will focus on the following two primary potential issues:Aesbestos-Containing Materials(ACM)and Lead-Containing Paint(LCP)on the bridges.Geocon will prepare a project- specific Health & Safety Plan and Preliminary Site Investigation Workplan for Client and Caltrans concurrence prior to fieldwork. Dokken anticipates that traffic control will be necessary to safely perform the field sampling. Asbestos-Containing Materials(ACM)/Lead-Containing Paint(LCP)Survey Geocon will provide services including: • Conduct asbestos and LCP surveys of the eight bridge structures; • Collect up to 160 bulk material samples for asbestos analysis by polarized light microscopy(PLM); • Additionally analyze up to 24 of the bulk asbestos samples by PLM point count methodology(1,000 points); • Collect up to 32 samples of paint for lead analysis by USEPA Test Method 601013; • Analyze up to 20 of the paint samples for soluble lead using the WET and 20 of the paint samples for soluble lead using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure test; and • Prepare an asbestos and LCP survey report. During the asbestos and LCP survey,our staff will: • Conduct a walkthrough inspection of the bridge structures to identify and inventory suspect ACM and potential LCP. �11DONIKE N 23 - 177 8/4/2®AW2 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A • Collect representative bulk samples of suspect ACM and submit using chain-of-custody (COC) documentation to a laboratory accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Plan for the analysis of asbestos in bulk material samples. • Analyze suspect ACM samples collected during the surveys on a 5-day turnaround time using PLM according to the EPA- recommended method. • Collect bulk samples of potential LCP using techniques presented in United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines. In addition, each painted area sampled will be evaluated for evidence of deterioration such as flaking or cracking. • Submit paint samples to a California-licensed and California State Water Resources Control Board-accredited laboratory for lead analyses in accordance with USEPA Test Method 6010B under COC documentation on a 5-day turnaround time. • Prepare one electronic version of a final asbestos and LCP survey report that will include a general property description, sample/laboratory analytical results,ACM and deteriorated LCP quantities,types, condition,and locations, photographs of identified ACM and LCP, and inspector/laboratory certification data. A bridge structure drawing illustrating sample locations will also be included in the report.The drawing will be proportional, but not to-scale. A reasonable effort will be made to identify suspect ACMs and LCPs. However,this does not imply a guarantee that all possible sources will be identified as certain materials may be hidden by structural materials or may be otherwise inaccessible. During future renovation or demolition operations, suspect ACMs and potential LCP may be uncovered. These materials should be treated as ACM and LCP, respectively, until evaluation, sampling, and analysis indicate otherwise. Task 1.3.2 Deliverables:Phase I Initial Site Assessment(ISA)Report,-Phase II Preliminary Site Investigation(PSI)report Task 1.3.3 Natural Environmental Study(Minimal Impacts) A Dokken biologist will conduct fieldwork in order to assess the presence/absence of sensitive biological resources (e.g., species or habitats), or to determine the potential for occurrence of such resources. A literature search will be conducted. The location of any sensitive biological resources in the study area, including plants and plant communities,will be mapped. Surveys will be timed for the appropriate season, e.g. plant surveys during the blooming season. A Natural Environment Study(Minimal Impacts)(NES(MI))in the current Caltrans format will be prepared.The field methods will be described along with the field survey and literature search results. Plant and animal species observed will be listed, along with a general description of vegetative communities. Sensitive resources found will be mapped and evaluated in the NES(MI).The report will contain tables describing sensitive species and their habitats that are present or potentially present; it will identify and assess project impacts on the existing biological resources, including any sensitive species. Mitigation measures will be included as necessary. Task 1.3.3 Deliverables:Natural Environment Study(Minimal Impacts) Task 1.3.4 Cultural Resources/Section 106 Compliance BPMP activities are oftentimes considered a "screened undertaking" and may be exempt from the Caltrans Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) compliance process. Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans to determine if the proposed project activities qualify for a screened undertaking, which many involve some preliminary research, including a records search through the California Historical Resources Inventory System (CHRIS). Should Caltrans not agree that the project qualifies as a screened undertaking, Dokken will conduct Section 106 of the NHPA cultural resource identification efforts.These efforts include delineation of an Area of Potential Effects(APE), Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search, CHRIS records search, historical research, Native American consultation, a pedestrian survey, and preliminary assessment of buried site potential within the APE.The results of the identification efforts will be documented in an Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) and Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR). This task assumes that no cultural resources that require recordation and evaluation for the National Register of Historic Places will be identified within the APE. Although the project may qualify for a CEQA exemption which does not require CEQA Native American consultation,should the City request it, Dokken can assist with the preparation of Project Notification Letters,per California Public Resources Code (PRC) §21080.3.1 (also referred to as AB 52). Dokken can assist the City with subsequent Native American consultation meetings, requests,and recommendations conducted under both Section 106 of the NHPA and PRC§21080.3.1 (AB 52). Task 1.3.4 Deliverables:Historic Property Survey/Archaeological Survey Report,Record Search,Native American Consultation Log ffm(KKEN 23 - 178 8/4/2®AW3 Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Task 1.3.5 Section 4(f)/Section 6(f)Documentation Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans and the City to verify that the project meets the definition of"temporary occupancy" for the purposes of completing the Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) documentation. Because the bridges are elevated over the parks and trails, except the W MacArthur Blvd bridge, the maintenance work does not conflict with the use of the parks or trails.A de minimis level of documentation is not anticipated.A letter report or memorandum will be prepared to document the findings and concurrence on the temporary occupancy finding will be requested from the official with jurisdiction over the parks and trails. Task 1.3.5 Deliverables:Section 4(f)and Section 6(f)Documentation Task 1.3.6 Water Quality Assessment Memorandum Dokken will prepare a Water Quality Assessment Report to address the potential for project impacts on water quality based on current Caltrans guidelines (Environmental Handbook Volume 1, Chapter 9, Water Quality). The report will discuss the waters within the project areas and the receiving waters conditions, objectives, and beneficial uses as well as Caltrans standard best management practices (BMPs) and project design features required in accordance with the current Caltrans Statewide Storm Water Management Plan.This scope and fee assumes that a full Water Quality Assessment Report will not be required by Caltrans. Task 1.3.6 Deliverables: Water Quality Assessment Memorandum Task 1.3.7 CEQA Notice of Exemption(NOE)Form and Evaluation Letter; NEPA Categorical Exclusion Based on identified type of maintenance work identified in the BPMP Plan and preliminary research, the proposed project qualifies for CEQA categorical exemption 15301 for existing facilities. Dokken Engineering will prepare a letter that evaluates whether there are any exceptions that would preclude the use of the CEQA exemption. If no exceptions exist,a CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE)for will be prepared for the City to file NOE. Dokken will file the NOE with the State Clearinghouse.This scope and fee include the$50.00 filing fee.Dokken will work with Caltrans Local Assistance to prepare a Categorical Exclusion as the NEPA approval document for the project and will include avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures provided in the technical studies prepared. Task 1.3.7 Deliverables:Notice of Exemption(NOE)Form and Recommendation Letter TASK 1.4 REGULATORY PERMITS TASK 1.4.1 Section 401 Waste Water Discharge Permit Below deck work is needed for spall repair; however, such maintenance work of existing, serviceable structures is typically exempt from Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting. Non-exempt work may be authorized under the Regional General Permit(RGP) Number 100 issued to the Orange County Flood Control Division by the Corps of Engineers.Coverage under the RGP requires the filing of a Notice of Intent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for a Waste Water Discharge Permit and is included in this scope.The Orange County Public Works also has a Streambed Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that authorizes OCPW to conduct routine maintenance, and it is assumed the City would prepare the necessary Verification Request Form to submit to CDFW. Task 1.4.1 Deliverables:RWQCB Notice of Intent and Waste Water Discharge Permit TASK 1.5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TASK 1.5.1 Preliminary Design Concept Dokken will organize a kick-off meeting with the City staff to discuss the conceptual design plan, project goals and objectives, potential elements and issues, schedule, review of existing information,and conduction of a site investigation. The BPMP Plan includes eight(8) bridges where bridge preventive maintenance is to be performed. Dokken Engineering will field verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided 2020 BPMP Plan.Along with the field review and record research, Dokken Engineering will identify any other maintenance work necessary on the listed bridges to bring them to current conformance with the Caltrans inspection criteria and standards. Based on the results and recommendations from the field review and records research,maintenance activities may get added or removed.The scope of this project will be based off the provided, listed maintenance activities. Activities may be added to or removed from the scope as authorized. TASK 1.5.2 BRIDGE DECK TESTING (OPTIONAL) Two bridges(BR#55C0055-Main Street at Santiago Creek Channel and BR#55C0423-171h Street at Santa Ana River Channel) have been identified in the inspection reports and BPMP Plan to core the bridge deck and test for chloride content. This investigative work will be included in the scope of this task to determine recommendations based on chloride contents found. &�ONNE N 23 - 179 8/4/2@AW4 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A The recommendations for work activities may be added and included in the PS&E package as performed in Task 2 of this scope. For the 1973 Main Street bridge deck,twelve(12)4-inch-diameter cores,spaced at roughly one location per 1,300 ft2 will be extracted, and immediately reinstated with rapid-setting patch material to restore traffic by morning. Each core will be sectioned into two depth intervals (0—%in. and %-1%in.) and transferred to an AASHTO-accredited laboratory for ASTM C1152 acid-soluble chloride testing. A California-licensed professional engineer will analyze the chloride-versus-depth data and prepare a signed memorandum projecting remaining time to corrosion initiation and recommending appropriate preservation measures. For the 17th Street bridge, a structure flagged for more advanced distress, Optime will first complete a 100%delamination sounding and ground-penetrating-radar survey to delineate subsurface delamination and thickness variations across the 32,936 ft'deck.Twenty(20)4-inch cores(about one per 1,650 ftz)will then be extracted, rapidly patched,and forwarded to the laboratory.All cores will be tested for chloride content in two discrete depth increments, and four strategically selected samples (two from a highly distressed zone and two from a sound zone)will undergo detailed petrographic examination in accordance with ASTM C856 to assess micro-cracking, aggregate quality, and air-void parameters. Findings from the nondestructive survey and laboratory analyses will be integrated into a PE-sealed report that includes a georeferenced deck-condition map and a decision matrix comparing methacrylate sealing,thin overlay, or partial-depth repair as the most cost-effective rehabilitation strategy. TASK 1.5.3 PHOTO DOCUMENTED BRIDGE ASSESSMENT There may be additional distress or damage discovered outside of those identified in the Bridge Inspection Reports. Work activities to repair, or to prevent damage from perpetuating further in the future, may be recommended and qualify to include in the project work activities. For the eight bridges identified in the BPMP plan, Dokken will take photos to document locations where there is existing damage, or where future damage can be mitigated. Dokken will prepare comprehensive photo-documented memorandum with itemized cost estimates detailing recommended bridge preventive maintenance work for each bridge. Dokken will assist the City to submit Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) Forms 6A and 6D to request the anticipated funding to accommodate the additional work. Task 1.5.3 Deliverables:One(1)digital Bridge Assessment Memorandum TASK 1.6 SURVEY Based on the BPMP plan and bridge inspection reports, the identified work recommendations are limited to structure maintenance activities. Available parcel data indicates work is to be performed within City, Orange County Flood Control District, County, or Caltrans Right-of-Way; therefore no boundary surveys for temporary construction easements are anticipated. TASK 1.7 WATER QUALITY Based on the BPMP plan,the work activities identified are limited to structure maintenance.There are no anticipated changes to either the structure,channel,or impervious areas within the project footprint to warrant hydrology or hydraulics analysis. Dokken will assist the City to complete the internal WQMP/SWPP determination form to determine that the project does not trigger LID or WQMP requirements. Dokken will identify best management practices for implementation in project plans and specifications. TASK 1.8 PUBLIC OUTREACH Dokken will assist the City in preparing for and attending a public meeting at the outset of final design to provide a project update to the public and interested stakeholders. Notices would be prepared and sent to all stakeholders and exhibits would be developed to facilitate discussion regarding project details. TASK 1.9 UTILITY COORDINATION Based on the work being performed, utility relocations are not expected. It is anticipated that Relocation Claim Letter to Owners(Letter#2)and liability determination will not be necessary. Utility Base Mapping Dokken will prepare a letter request for as-builts and facility mapping form each of the utility companies,for the City's review and approval. Dokken will perform a field review of the project site to ascertain existing conditions compared to the as-built drawings. Using available record drawings, information from the field reconnaissance and utility mark outs, Dokken will prepare a utility base map in CAD format identifying the existing utilities. Utilities will be shown on the project plans where applicable. &��KWE N 23 — 180 8/4/2®a'�s E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Utility Impact Identification and No Conflicts Letter Dokken Engineering will review the project improvements against the existing utility base mapping and identify potential utility impacts. Dokken will develop an inventory of potential utility impacts, confirm utility rights with City records, and prepare Utility Notice to Owners—No Conflict(Letter#3)for distribution to pertinent utility companies, if needed. Task 1.9 Deliverables:Utility Mapping Requests(Letter#1);Existing Utility Base Map; Utility Notice to Owners—No Conflict (Letter#3) TASK 1.10 30%PLANS SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE(PS&E) Dokken Engineering will develop schematic plans, which shall include civil design, structural design, draft technical specifications outline and "opinion of estimated cost".Work activities will include those verified on the provided BPMP Plan List,as well as any additional recommended activities from the project research as agreed upon with the City. The 30% phase will incorporate recommendations from Project Research to define work activities and project limits. The plans will be prepared based off existing records and as-builts. Any additional work that is not part of the current project scope and the City wishes to include into the project will be discussed during this stage of the project. 30%Plans and Opinion of Probable Cost Obtain and review all relevant as-built plans and the most recent Caltrans bridge inspection reports to create the preliminary plans of the bridge repairs.Quantities and cost estimates will be prepared for all structures. Task 1.10 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans;One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost;One(1)digital copy of Draft Technical Specifications Outline TASK 2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS(60%,90%,and 100%PS&E) Dokken will integrate Cost Estimates, utility mapping, encroachment permits, and easements as applicable. Dokken will coordinate submittals with the City,Caltrans,and any other stakeholder Agency. Burne Engineering will support and perform a portion the bridge preventive maintenance work tasked herein. The Dokken Team will provide bridge preventive maintenance work,traffic handling, signing/striping and coordination. Plan and specification submittals shall be provided in digital format to the City. Hard copy plan sets may be provided upon request. Digital files shall be in Portable Document Format(PDF)and AutoCAD 2023 format.Technical Specifications will be prepared using the Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Special Provisions(latest versions)as a basis, modified for FHWA requirements and submitted along with plans at 60%,90%and 100%. A formal Quality Control(QC)review will be performed by Dokken and Burne Engineering at each submittal phase.The review will address construction drawings,technical specifications,cost estimates,and overall constructability of the project. Traffic,Signing and Striping Dokken will design permanent striping,pavement markings,and signing plans per the California MUTCD latest edition.Signing and Striping plans will be prepared at each bridge location receiving methacrylate deck treatment to maintain the existing striping configuration. It is assumed that the programmed bridge maintenance work will occur in stages at each bridge to maintain at least one lane of traffic in each direction during construction. Typical Traffic Control Applications from latest CA MUTCD or Caltrans Standard Plans will be utilized for the various closure scenarios anticipated. Caltrans Encroachment Permits will be obtained for BR#55C-0055 and 55C-0115,as applicable,where signing and signing or traffic handling encroach into Caltrans Right-of-Way. Task 2.160%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) Upon approval of 30% PS&E by the City and Caltrans and upon receiving environmental clearance (both NEPA and CEQA), The Dokken team will prepare and submit the draft 60%plans,specifications,and estimate to the City. 60%Plans Upon approval of the work limits defined in the 30% project phase, work will begin on the 60% plans. The plans will incorporate any comments received from the City from the 30%submittal review and will incorporate all construction details including signing/striping and traffic handling necessary to complete BPMP work. The plans will show utilities based on research and utility mapping.A full set of plans will be prepared with consideration for constructability and public safety. Although not anticipated, if any ancillary structures design is needed, it shall be in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Eighth Edition) with California Amendments current at time of bridge design, Caltrans Bridge Design Details Manual, Caltrans Bridge Design Aids, Caltrans Bridge Memos to Designers, Structure Technical Policies, and Bridge Design Memos, Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC), Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications (latest version), and City CAD Standards.The bridge design work will be performed in English units of measure. r'111)ONNE N 23 — 181 8/4/2®AW6 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A 60%Opinion of Probable Cost The Dokken Team will provide cost estimates at the 60% PS&E design submittal. Detailed quantities will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans Standard Specifications (latest version) and payment items. The engineer's estimate of probable construction cost ("Marginal Estimate") for the project will be prepared using the most recent and relevant Caltrans Cost Data,Consultants cost data,as well as the City's cost data. 60%Contract Specifications and Special Provisions The Dokken Team will prepare the contract Technical Provisions for the project based in general on Caltrans Standard Special Provisions(latest version) as a basis and modified for FHWA requirements, Caltrans Standard Specifications (latest version), and City construction contract standards. Task 2.1 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans and Specifications,One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; Two (2)Caltrans Encroachment Permit applications,One(1)digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. Task 2.2 90%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) At the 90%level,a thorough review of the plans,work limits,details and specifications is performed for clarity,capacity,City standards, and constructability issues. When the review is complete, the designers will address all comments from the internal and City reviews of the PS&E package.After plan corrections,the designer will review the corrected details to ensure all comments have been addressed. The Dokken Team will proceed with the preparation of the 90% submittal. Plan sheets included in the 60% submittal will receive additional annotation, descriptions, and notes identified per the City's review and the independent check. The submittal will include written responses to all comments received on the prior submittal. Task 2.2 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans and Specifications,One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost,• Two (2) Final Caltrans Encroachment Permit applications; One (1) digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. Task 2.3 100%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) At the 100% level, the QC focus will be to confirm prior review comments have been adequately addressed and review any new information added since the 90%submittal. A mark-up of the plans, special provisions and item list will be provided to the Project Manager. After review comments are received from the 90% Bridge PS&E,The Dokken Team will revise the plans and coordinate the necessary changes to the specifications and estimate.Written responses to the City and Caltrans comments will be prepared and provided with the 100%submittal. Task 2.3 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plan and specifications;one(1)digital set of 100%Bidding Documents;one(1) digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; One (1) digital copy of Design Calculations if applicable; One(1)digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. TASK 3 BID ADVERTISEMENT,CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION,RECORD DRAWINGS Task 3.1 Bid Advertisement Bidding procedures will be the responsibility of the City. While the PS&E construction package is advertising for bids, all questions concerning the intent shall be referred to the City for resolution. In the event that any item requiring interpretation in the drawings or specifications is discovered during the bidding period,said items shall be analyzed by Dokken for decision by the City. Dokken shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification,or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Dokken shall attend pre-bid meeting, if scheduled. Task 3.2 Construction Administration Dokken shall provide support to the City during the Construction Administration phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification,and/or reviewing submittals. Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required to support the construction contract. Dokken shall complete shop drawings reviews within two(2)weeks of receipt.Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two(2)working days of receipt.Dokken shall be available as requested by the City to resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Dokken shall bring to the attention of the City any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which Dokken may observe. Dokken shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City,or to deputize another to do so. Task 3.3 Record Drawings/As-Builts Upon construction completion, the City will submit field-marked prints to Dokken. Dokken shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations,signature,and submit to the City. �11DONNE N 23 - 182 8/4/2@AW7 E N G IN E E R ING 00 00 o R� - =s m •� e E N v a\ p m N m N c " O� ` ► �� o < W r N 8 P N m v m N v Y o Z c 0• T m 0 p 1. o E z a 6 2 'm e y o dS O •- K f •0 9 'o 0 i - 19 a" cv n _ - u' N u M 6 `0 o o u C y 3 p o \'/ 3 E E 00 v if1 �l1 N N N N �O tp �O •D N b N \ M \ \ I� O \ N \ \ \ \ N a \'J \ \ N N O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Mf M N N N \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ 4.\ C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N W O O O O O O O 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 9 2 2 2 2 2o 2' 2 H H 2 H 2 2 2 2 2 2 � N b N \ N C \ C N - wN N N n .Ni N .Ni eNi 0 0 o o 8' a �0 a a a a .00•i v `.� a3o m ry a ry n n a a w `o L - m 0 o m O Z K N Y, oY•, o O U E ,� c c �. z - 0o t o r o o • N m co z° a `.r-' E - o z u e a ° c c oco c°- v o � m Y .` _ _ w _ a o ' .. v a Q - - m m z¢ E - -- 2 N ac 3 $ m « .� E ' Y O d m o o a u w ° z —"p o m 3 � � � � � �•W N m M z O i WLn u } v do Z W � a a d' m w Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A AGREEMENT STATEMENT Dokken Engineering does not take any exceptions to the City's Professional Services Agreement. Dokken Engineering will comply with the contract terms and conditions delineated in the RFP. FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE ABOUT DOKKEN ENGINEERING R§ DOKKEN Founded in 1986, Dokken Engineering(Dokken) is a multi-discipline, professional services firm specializing in all phases of project development and delivery, ENGINEERING including preliminary engineering, environmental documents, feasibility studies, HEADQUARTERS: PSRs, PA&EDs,PS&Es,and design support during construction. During the past 39 110 Blue Ravine Road,Suite 200 years, we have developed an exceptional depth of experience and expertise Folsom,CA 95630 having engineered and obtained environmental compliance on more than 3,000 Project Manager: infrastructure projects, including more than 2,500 federally funded projects. Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE 1450 Frazee Road,Suite 100 We employ a diverse group of over 160 civil, structural, traffic, hydraulics/ San Diego, CA 92108 hydrology, and drainage designers, as well as environmental planners, Telephone: (858)514-8377 community outreach experts, funding, and right-of-way specialists, who Mobile: (541)602-2960 together provide seamless and cost-effective project delivery.Due to our size,and Branch Offices: our in-house services, we can immediately provide a team of professionals to 1450 Frazee Road,Suite 100 meet your project's schedule needs. San Diego, CA 92108 Dokken Engineering's performance is measured by our ability to successfully 101 Pacifica,Suite 350 deliver quality infrastructure projects throughout California and serving a variety Irvine,CA 92618 of public agency clients.The majority of Dokken's clients are repeat clients! This 2192 Civic Center Drive attests to our abilities and history of providing quality services, meeting Redding,CA 96001 schedules,and remaining within budgets.Dokken has a long,distinguished history Organization Form:CA Corporation of delivering award-winning projects that have been completed throughout Year of Incorporation: 1986 California. No other firm has a greater record of professional civil engineering Total No.of Employees: 162 project success than Dokken. But don't take our word for it,call our references. Firm Capabilities&Expertise: FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY • Project Management Dokken is a growing,financially responsible firm with the majority of our business • Structures coming from repeat clients. Dokken is financially sound and has no long-term • HBP. Street Improvements debt.We promptly pay our subconsultants and vendors,evidenced by our Class 1 • Roadway/Highway Design credit ratings with Dun & Bradstreet (DUNS #1S-020-9971). For all our years in . Stormwater business, we have maintained insurance coverage that exceeds industry • Water/Sewer standards through reputable insurance companies with the highest A.M. Best • Street Lighting ratings.As a California Corporation for the past 39 years,there are no planned or • Signing/Striping anticipated changes in our business organization or operations. • Erosion Control • Drainage Dokken meets all of Caltrans' A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process • Hydrology/Hydraulics requirements and successfully navigates the process with every one of our • Traffic Control Plans Writing • projects subject to Caltrans oversight. We have our financial statements and . Grant Grant NEPA/CECW overhead rate voluntarily audited annually by an independent CPA to expedite . Environmental Permits the Caltrans audit process and to ensure that our financials and indirect cost rate . Right of Way Acquisition& comply with all Federal funding rules. Our accounting staff and independent Relocation Assistance auditors regularly attend Caltrans Audits and Investigations training sessions to www.dokkenengineering.com ensure that we are up to date with the latest requirements. FAMILIARITY WITH SERVICES Dokken has successfully completed hundreds of structure designs, from rural two-lane HBP bridges, to complex multi-level freeway-to-freeway interchanges. Additional structure designs include pedestrian overcrossings, bicycle bridges, viaducts, and retaining/sound walls. Dokken has also provided seismic stability evaluations, retrofit plans, Bridge Preventative �11DONNEN 23 - 184 8/4/2@AW9 E N G I N E E R I N G Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Maintenance Plans, specifications, and estimates. Our structures team has innovative and cost-effective design solutions which save our clients millions of dollars. Paying careful attention to the details of a project's setting, along with client and community feedback,our designs meet the unique conditions of each project. IN-HOUSE EXPERTISr With numerous technical specialties under one roof, project coordination,and communication are maximized.The following are some of our featured in-house services: Roadway Design I Roadway design is an Environmental Services I Dokken has an integral component of Dokken's services. From experienced in-house Environmental Services freeways to residential streets, our engineers Group that works on our roadway, bridge, and design both simple and complex roadway widenings, infrastructure projects throughout California. We have realignments, street "diets", and new extensions, as well established professional working relationships with as the required improvements to the surrounding areas, federal and state regulatory agencies based on technical such as bikeway and pedestrian facilities, rail trails, excellence and a thorough understanding of regulatory landscaping, hardscapes, sidewalks, utility relocations, processes, including, Environmental Document bus stop/pullouts and intersection signalization. Preparation (NEPA / CEQA Analysis and Compliance), Structures Design I Dokken has successfully Technical Studies & Reports, and Environmental completed hundreds of structure designs,from Regulatory Permitting & Compliance using a hands-on rural two-lane HBP bridges to complex multi- approach that has accelerated regulatory schedules. level freeway-to-freeway interchanges. Additional Right of Way Services I The Dokken team has structure designs include pedestrian overcrossings, Row considerable experience preparing right of bicycle bridges, viaducts, and retaining/sound walls. way engineering documents under State and Dokken has also provided seismic stability evaluations, Federal law as outlined in the Caltrans Right of Way retrofit plans, specifications, and estimates. Our Manual. Our services consist of researching public structures team has innovative and cost-effective design records,obtaining title reports, preparing appraisal maps, solutions,which save our clients millions of dollars. Paying owner exhibits, and plats and legal descriptions for the careful attention to the details of a project's setting,along conveyance of land title rights, such as easements, fee with client and community feedback, our designs meet title grant deeds, and temporary construction easements the unique conditions of each project. between parties. TRUSTI=I?SURCONSULTANTS Dokken has enlisted the following subconsultants to meet the City's DBE goal and to provide a full-service team. Burne Engineering (DBE) Employing over 350 technically strong and highly Structural Design motivated engineers,geologists,environmental scientists, and technicians. State-of-the-art geotechnical and Established in 2007, Burne Engineering Services, Inc. materials testing laboratories, extensive inventories of (Burne Engineering) is a certified DBE structural field equipment and instrumentation, comprehensive engineering firm, specializing in the design and technical libraries, and advanced data-management construction support of transportation-related structures, systems support each office. such as bridges and retaining walls, and buildings. Their licensed professional engineers have been designing Optime Consulting Group transportation-related structures for more than twenty- = Surveying/Right of Way Engineering five years, having provided construction support for more than a hundred bridges and dozens of retaining walls. Optime Consulting Group, certified SB/SBE firm, is a dynamic and innovative force in the construction industry. Geocon Consultants, Inc. They specialize in concrete materials, forensic Hazardous Materials assessment, nondestructive testing, pavement design and evaluation, and sustainability, approaching each project Geocon Consultants, Inc. is a California Corporation with technical precision and a deep sense of established in 1971 as a professional engineering responsibility. Optime Consulting Group offers a wide consulting firm providing comprehensive geotechnical range of materials-related services, including material engineering, environmental consulting, materials testing, characterization, testing, performance evaluation, failure and special inspection services for over 54 years. analysis,and material design and optimization. �11 D 0(KIl-IS L�iE N 23 — 185 8/4/2&&6o ENG IN E E R IN G Request for Proposals �+ j �II Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A PROJECT TEAM Leading our team and coordinating our team's resources is Project Manager, Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE. Gabriel brings over 14 years of experience in providing project specific engineering solutions and managing civil engineering services for public agency infrastructure projects. His time-sensitive approach to managing projects has resulted in expedited project completion,the quick restoration of facility operations,and adherence to project budgets,schedules,and goals. Gabriel will be directly responsible for project management and the primary contact with the City. The following organizational chart visually represents the structure of our proposed team and the relationship among our Project Manager, subconsultants,and support staff. Charles Tornad, ' Gabriel Hoxnneier, • Subconsultants L PROJECT MANAGER 7 Burne Engineering(BE)-DBE ooyrnan, ' Geocon Consultants, Inc.(GEO) """""""""""""""""""""' • • C REVIEW Optime Consulting Group,Inc.(OCG) RoadwayStructure Design , Gabriela Morales,PE Lori Burne, SE(BE) Megan Cunningham, PE Jeffrey Little Russ Nygaard, PE(9E) CoordinationUtility Jena Addenbrooke, PE Vanessa Cothran,SR/WA Ashley Orsaba-Finders, PE,QSD/P Hazardous Material Concrete Testing -Indicates Key Staff Rebecca Silva(GEO) Kamran Amini, PhD, PE(OCG) Cord Denning,CAC(GEO) William Clifford(OCG) The following resumes provides qualification information for our key personnel including their technical expertise and experience directly related to the proposed work. I sPOKKIE N 23 — 186 8/4/��61 N N G I N E E K I N G Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE improvements, there are retaining walls to support streets, parking lots and general grading. Developed PROJECT MANAGER designs, plans and specifications for seven retaining walls EDUCATION of various types including masonry, spread footings, and 2010, BS Civil Engineering,Oregon State University CIDH foundation walls.Project is on-going through its 95% 2011, M.Eng.,Civil Engineering,Oregon State University submittal. LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS Grandview Beach Access Stairway Structural 2022,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C93700 Assessment I Encinitas,CA Bridge Design Engineer I Dokken Engineering conducted EXPERIENCE investigations, structural assessment, and repair 14 years(2 w/Dokken) estimates for the multi-level timber and concrete beach AVAILABILITY access stairway located along the Coast Highway. 40% Structural inspections consisted of field investigations to test, inventory, and photo document maintenance needs Mr. Gabriel Hoxmeier is a California for stairway elements experiencing deterioration from registered professional engineer with prolonged marine exposure. Concrete soundings and jJ 14 years of experience whose timber specimen cores were taken to assess the material primary role is as a bridge engineer conditions. Provided structural evaluation memorandums designing transportation related detailing the conditions of the main structural concrete structures. His expertise includes and timber elements,and steel connection hardware,and designing bridges,retaining walls,overhead estimated maintenance and repair costs. sign structures, and culverts, working with steel, Bryan District Bridge Program,TxDOT I Bryan District, prestressed concrete, post-tensioned concrete, and TX conventionally reinforced concrete. He has strong fundamentals with a broad design background with Work Authorization Manager � Oversaw design team, concrete and steel superstructures, substructures, load project budget, schedule, contract development, and ratings, seismic designs, and inspections. Mr. Hoxmeier's contract supplemental agreements. Program covers project experience includes preliminary concept designs, development of PS&E packages for 35 bridges design-bid-builds, design-build projects, and load ratings replacements in the Bryan District over 5 years with a total and assessments of existing structures. contract fee of$14M. The program is uniquely designed to alleviate TxDOT's resources as 30%, 60% and 90% Alvarado Canyon Road Realignment I San Diego,CA submittals are performed by an internal independent Bridge Design Engineer I Dokken is providing preliminary review team instead of TxDOT. Bridges are a mix of OFF engineering and PS&E design for the Alvarado Canyon and ON system bridges with construction fundings ranging Road Realignment & Culvert Replacement Project. The from$400,000 to$9,000,000. Bridges include slab beams, primary purpose of the project is to alleviate current and box beams, and Tx girders. Held Design Concept projected future traffic congestion on Fairmount Avenue, Conferences with the client and representatives about the Mission Gorge Road, Alvarado Canyon Road, and the preliminary project concept. Coordinated with sub- westbound 1-8 off-ramp at Fairmount Ave, and address consultants for survey, utilities, and geotechnical localized flooding issues within the portions of Grantville investigations. Lead design team through development of located north of Alvarado Creek. Developed APS for the PS&E packages. Alvarado Canyon Bridge, as well as a widening of an Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement I Santa Monica, existing box culvert investigating constructability, CA construction costs, and staged construction. Bridge Design Engineers This project will replace the East Campus Loop Road, UCSD I San Diego,CA existing 446-foot Pier Bridge that connects to the timber Lead Structures Engineer I UC San Diego is proposing pier. Gabriel is responsible for design and coordination for improvements to its East Campus. One major point of the existing bridge demolition plans, steel staircase and focus for the renovation of East Campus includes pier railing, and temporary vehicle ramps to maintain reconfiguring existing roadways and incorporating new access to the pier. The project team completed the 65% landscape space to free up additional infill building sites design in April 2024 and the project is on schedule to bid in and enhance circulation for all users. Among the project 2025. �POKKE N 23 - 187 8/4/2&'&62 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Charles Tornad, PE 2018-2019 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Carlsbad,CA PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Project Manager I Responsible for advancing the PS&E for EDUCATION bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two 1999, BS Mechanical Engineering, Cal Poly San Luis structures. Jefferson Street Bridge involved providing a Obispo methacrylate overlay to seal existing deck cracks, LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS replacement and repairs to existing bridge railings and 2023,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C66058 metal beam guard railing approach systems, as well as sidewalk remediation to meet ADA standards. El Camino EXPERIENCE Real Bridge at San Marcos Creek involved methacrylate 25 years(All w/Dokken) overlay in multiple stages with traffic handling plans reviewed and approved by Caltrans to receive the AVAILABILITY Encroachment Permit to perform the work. Pressure 30% grouting of deteriorated slopes below sidewalk curb ramps was performed to mitigate future costly repairs. Mr. Charles Tornaci is Dokken's San Diego structures team leader, both Maria Ygnacia Creek Bridge I San Barbara County,CA - + overseeing and performing the Project Manager I Responsible for the seismic retrofit of structural analysis and design efforts an existing 3-span 132-foot-long composite steel girder for bridge projects in Southern bridge on San Marcos Road over Maria Ygnacia Creek. California. With over 25 years of Retrofit consisted of replacing existing steel pier column experience on structural transportation cross bracing, adding additional base plates and anchor projects spanning over Caltrans, Railroad, and Army Corp bolts at existing pier columns, and cast-in-drilled-hole facilities, he is very familiar with Caltrans Local Assistance piling behind the abutments to restrain longitudinal and Division of Structures standards and practices, seismic movements. Design challenges included detailing specializing in innovative and cost-effective design around and accommodating several existing underground solutions. He has been involved in a wide range of and overhead utilities within the construction limits. projects involving planning, design, construction, seismic retrofits of vehicular and pedestrian bridges, retaining City of Palm Desert Bridge Preventive Maintenance walls, bike trails,and bridge preventive maintenance. Palm Desert,CA 2016-2017 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Project Manager I Responsible for preparing the City's Carlsbad,CA Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program and Prioritization List, including a report documenting the Project Manager I Responsible for the site investigations City's bridge inventory and maintenance needs, scoring and documentation memorandum detailing structural criteria, construction cost estimates, and condition photo defects in the existing structures and recommendations documentation of bridges within the City. Worked for preventative maintenance to extend the serviceable directly with City staff to organize a multi-year phasing life for 10 local agency bridges within the City of Carlsbad. strategy for the maintenance work to meet the Worked directly with City staff to update maintenance prioritization in conjunction with City fiscal year budget priority and led the project team to advance the PS&E for allocations,and led the project team to complete PS&E for bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two bridge preventive maintenance of five structures. Repair structures.Calle Barcelona POC details involved repairs to details involved joint seal replacements and expansion spalled rock fagades,crack sealing,and righting of a tilting dams, corrugated steel arch culvert repair and monument wall. Poinsettia Lane OH work involved replacement splicing, and concrete spall repairs on replacing bridge railing and repairing approach railing existing superstructures and substructures. damaged by exposure to marine environment, adding expansion joints, and concrete crack repair. Details and Additional Relevant Experience: materials specified to address coastal environment • Grandview and Swami's Beach Stairway Structural conditions. Railroad specific project specifications were Assessment, Encinitas, CA included with the contract documents to detail required • Sycamore Avenue Beach Access Stairways right of entry agreements and trainings required to Emergency Repair,Carlsbad,CA perform maintenance work over and adjacent to UPRR • Emergency Slope Repair, Del Mar,CA facilities. �111)@(KK1E N 23 - 188 8/4/2&&63 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Steve Kooyman, PE Project Manager I Steve assisted the City with managing this high priority park project for Brea from preliminary QA/QC REVIEW engineering into bid and award, with assistance into EDUCATION construction. The project design included new accessible 1991, BS Civil Engineering,CSU Chico playground equipment and surfacing, mass grading, retaining and sound walls, PCC walkways and curbs, new LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS restroom,new drainage treatment facilities,new ball fields 1996,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C55757 and amenities, amphitheater,all new utilities,ADA ramps, QSD/QSP Training new lighting, EV charging stations, and miscellaneous park Pavement Inspector Certification improvements within the Phase 1,5-acre area. EXPERIENCE Traffic Signal Modification Improvements I Brea,CA 32 years(<1 w/Dokken) Project Manager I Steve managed this signal modification AVAILABILITY project which replaced several signals at three 40% intersections in Brea. Brea Boulevard Street Improvements I Brea,CA Mr. Steve Kooyman is a Registered Civil Project Manager I Steve managed this pavement Engineer with 32 years of experience, t primarily serving jurisdictions in rehabilitation project which included milling 2" deep Northern and Southern California. His 30,000 sf of pavement, placement of 250,000 SF Type II roles have included Project Manager, Slurry, removing and replacement of 12 ADA ramps, and Construction Manager, Supervising Civil other AC and PCC street improvements along Brea Blvd Design Engineer, and Quality Control from Imperial Highway to Fir Street in Brea. Engineer. He has helped numerous cities deliver public South Brea Water,Sewer and Street Improvements I works Capital Improvement Program projects across Brea,CA various phases, including planning, environmental, right of way, design, bid, and construction. His expertise spans Project Manager I Steve managed this extensive water, sewer, storm drain, streets, PCC ADA, sidewalk, rehabilitation project which replaced 14,850 LF 8" C-900 facilities, parks, bike trails, erosion control, and stream water mains and appurtenances, 300 1"-2" copper water restoration projects.Steve also has extensive experience in services,32 FH's,1,794 LF of 6-8"VCP sewer mains,28 ADA development projects and Caltrans/City Cooperative ramps and misc.curb and gutter work,2,800 SF of AC R&R, Agreement coordination. His deep knowledge of 174,00 SF AC grinding, 1,850 TN's ARHM overlay, and engineering policies, codes, and standards makes him a 384,000 SF Type II slurry with, traffic control, and erosion valuable measures within various streets in the South Brea resource for engineers, architects, contractors, and public agencies. subdivision area. Trabuco Road and Lake Forest Boulevard Pavement SR 57&Lambert Road Interchange Improvements I Rehabilitation I Lake Forest,CA Brea,CA Project Manager I Steve managed the construction Project Manager I Project Manager for this $98 M management and inspection team through construction in Interchange Improvement project in coordination with City coordination with the City for this combined three CIP of Brea and Caltrans District 12 via cooperative agreement. project contract with All American Asphalt, contractor for He managed the extensive public and stakeholder outreach, Agency coordination, right-of-way acquisition, the City. CEQA/NEPA development and processing, mitigation Bear Street Pavement Rehabilitation I Costa Mesa,CA measures, schedule, budget with various State/Fed grant Project Manager I Steve completed the pavement design and local funding, PAED, PS&E, and Construction. The and managed the project in coordination with the City up project took over 10 years to complete from preliminary through bid & award and pre-construction for this % mile engineering,right-of-way,environmental/permits,PS&E to AC grind and cap project,inclusive of ADA ramps and misc. final construction with landscape phase into the two-year PCC sidewalk and curb and gutter replacement. plant establishment stage. Arovista Park Modernization Project I Brea,CA Additional Relevant Experience: • Costa Mesa Storm Water Master Plan,Costa Mesa,CA • Briarwood Sewer List Station, Brea,CA City Council 23 — 189 8/4/2026 R§DOKKEN PAGE14 ENGINEERING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Gabriela Morales, PE Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement I Santa Monica, CA STRUCTURES PROJECT ENGINEER Structures Design Engineer I This project will replace the EDUCATION existing Pier Bridge with a 7 span, 446-foot long, and 39- 2021, MS Civil Engineering, UC Davis foot-wide bridge. In addition to the bridge replacement, 2017, BS Structural Engineering, UC San Diego the project contains 11 additional structure tasks. LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS Gabriela is responsible for the bridge design, project 2022, California Professional Civil Engineer,#C93473 coordination,and QA/QC of all structure deliverables.The project team completed the 65%design in April 2024 and EXPERIENCE the project is on schedule to bid in 2025. 8 years(All w/Dokken) Fern Road East at Glendenning Creek Bridge AVAILABILITY Replacement I Shasta County,CA 50% Structures Project Engineer I This project will replace the existing timber bridge with a single-span, 95-foot long, Ms. Gabriela Morales is a California and 28-foot-wide bridge. Gabriela is responsible for the t __ registered Engineer with 8 years of bridge design of the cast-in-place post-tensioned bridge, } - experience in designing and analyzing g project coordination, and delivery of the PS&E for all bridges and other transportation- project milestones. The project team completed the 35% f related structures. She serves as an design in March 2024. associate engineer for Dokken's bridge and structure design team. She has Eastside Road and Sharon Ave. HBP Bridges I Redding, designed structures ranging from multi-span precast and CA cast-in-place bridges to multi-level anchored soldier pile Structures Design Engineer I The Eastside Road Bridge walls. crosses Olney Creek and Sharon Avenue Bridge crosses National Trails Highway 10 HBP Bridges I San the ACID irrigation canal. Sharon Avenue was replaced Bernardino County,CA with a single-span, 55-foot long, and 28-foot and 11-inch wide, cast-in-place/post-tensioned slab bridge. Eastside Structures Project Engineer I National Trails Road will be replaced with a three-span,86-foot long,and Highway/Route 66 is a historic route that was developed 52-foot wide, cast-in-place/post-tensioned slab bridge. through the Mojave Desert region of San Bernardino Gabriela was responsible for the design calculations, County.These bridges allow stormwater to flow under the development of the plans and cost estimate,and ongoing highway but are all at the end of their useful life. The construction support, including RFI responses and replacement bridges will be reinforced concrete slabs, submittal review. varying from 43-foot single-span to 90-foot three-span bridges. Gabriela is responsible for overseeing the design over Jack Peters Creek Bridge Widening Mendocino team,coordinating with the subconsultants, and ensuring Men County,CA on-time delivery of the PS&E for all project milestones. Structures Design Engineer I This project is part of Tulare County Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program Dokken's structures on-call contract in Caltrans District 1. (Group 5) 1 Tulare County,CA The project will widen the existing three-span 223-foot long continuous bridge over Jack Peters Creek.The bridge Structures Project Engineer I This project intends to will feature two 12-foot lanes and a 6-foot separated extend the service life of 24 bridges within Tulare County pedestrian walkway. Gabriela successfully wrote the by implementing preventive maintenance measures project's Type Selection Report.The report was approved primarily consisting of scour protection repairs and other by Caltrans and Gabriela completed the design phase of work including deck treatment, spall repair, structural the project, including all coordination with Caltrans connection repairs, join repairs, bridge bearing repairs, functional units.The project has bid in August 2023 and is and asphalt concrete removal. Gabriela is responsible for currently under construction. overseeing the design team, coordinating with the subconsultants,and ensuring on-time delivery of the PS&E Additional Relevant Experience for all project milestones. • Capital Southeast Connector:White Rock Road, El Dorado&Sacramento Counties,CA �111)@(KK1E N 23 - 190 8/4/ 65 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Megan Cunningham, PE rehabilitated approximately 10 miles of distressed pavement along eastbound Interstate 8. Stage ROADWAY DESIGN construction plans were developed by Caltrans, but the EDUCATION contractor presented a proposal to revise the stage 2016, BS Civil Engineering,Gonzaga University construction concept. Dokken worked with Caltrans to design and implement updated stage construction plans LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS that met Caltrans standards, but improved construction 2023,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C94909 efficiencies, reduced impact to the traveling public, and shortened the overall construction duration. EXPERIENCE 9 years(All w/Dokken) 1-805 South Asset Management Project—Bike Path San Diego,CA AVAILABILITY 40% Design Engineer I Responsible for preliminary design and Project Report support for a multi-use facility proposed as Ms. Megan Cunningham is an Associate part of the Asset Management project. Currently, bicycle 3 Engineer with experience in roadway access is permitted on the northbound and southbound design, stage construction and traffic shoulder of 1-805 between Palm Avenue and Main Street. handling design, curb ramp design, The project proposes to add a separated multi-use facility culvert design, bike path design, and to provide a more inviting and comfortable path. Dokken J: grant-writing. Ms. Cunningham is led the preliminary design and supported Caltrans in the proficient in both MicroStation V8i and creating the Project Report. AutoCAD Civil 3D design software. Coastal Rail Trail from Oceanside Boulevard to Morse Palm Avenue/1-805 Interchange I San Diego,CA Street I Oceanside,CA Design Engineer I Responsible for designing stage Design Engineer) Responsible for developing the final construction and traffic handling plans and assisting with Project Study Report and preparing the Active preparing roadway PS&E for Palm Avenue Interchange. Transportation Program (ATP) Grant Application. Dokken Dokken is providing PS&E design for the modifications to Engineering worked with the City of Oceanside to develop, improve traffic operations and alleviate future traffic analyze and present alternatives for the Coastal Rail Trail congestion at the 1-805/Palm Avenue interchange.Dokken connecting Morse Street and Oceanside Boulevard. The Engineering also served as Lead Author and Design Coastal Rail Trail is a planned continuous bicycle route that, Engineer for the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's Fiscal Year once complete,will provide a dedicated bike facility for 44 2022 Bridge Investment Program(BIP)Grant. Dokken,the miles between the City of Oceanside and Downtown San City of San Diego,and Caltrans District 11 worked together Diego. The project is needed to improve bicycle and and was 1 of only 9 projects to receive this grant funding pedestrian mobility through the corridor. as well as the only project in the state of California! As a Green Infrastructure Group 1014 1 San Diego,CA result,the City of San Diego received $24 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Design Engineer I Responsible for curb ramp and cross Administration (FHWA). gutter design, and preparing roadway PS&E. The project added cross gutters and curb ramps at the intersections of Green Tree Boulevard Extension Project I Victorville,CA Chamoune Avenue/Polk Avenue and 46th Street/Polk Design Engineer Responsible for stage Avenue.The project also includes environmental technical construction/traffic handling plans, water line design, studies for the project and providing Green Infrastructure assisting with preparing roadway PS&E, and providing to an underserviced area of the City, as part of the Green design support during construction for Green Tree Infrastructure Group 1014. Project improvements consist Boulevard project. Project improvements include of construction of storm drain inlets and pipes,storm drain constructing a new east-west arterial connecting Yates cleanouts, new curb ramps, curbs and gutters, cross Road/Yucca Loma Road to Hesperia Road including a new gutters, roadway reconstruction, striping and pavement overhead structure across the BNSF railroad. markings. In addition, the green infrastructure will also incorporate inlet biofiltration devices, Oldcastle 1-8 Stage Construction I San Diego County,CA StormCapture modules (or approved equivalent), and Design Engineer I Responsible for design support of stage Modular Wetland System Best Management Practices (or construction plans during construction. The Project approved equivalent). �11 ONIKE N 23 - 191 8/4/2&&66 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Jeffrey Little preparing regulatory permits including a CCC CDP for the new bridge. ENVIRONMENTAL Baker Boulevard Bridge over Mojave River Channel EDUCATION Replacement I San Bernardino,CA 1990,AA Business,Sacramento City College Senior Environmental Planner I San Bernardino intends EXPERIENCE to replace the wood trestle bridge in the community of 30 years(<1 w/Dokken) Baker. Funding for a new bridge was secured and the environmental process commenced. Jeff prepared the AVAILABILITY Visual Impact Assessment and Water Quality Assessment 40% Report for the project. Mr. Jeffery Little (Jeff) is a Senior Kings County Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Environmental Planner with 30 years Kings County,CA of experience on transportation Senior Environmental Planner I Kings County intends projects in Caltrans Districts 1, 2, 3,4, repair 15 bridges in their Project List No.2 group. The 4 5,and 10 for Caltrans Local Assistance project entails environmental compliance, PS&E, and - oversight and Capital projects. He ROW.Jeff is managing the environmental process for the manages multi-disciplinary teams to 15 bridges. satisfy complex regulatory requirements and complete CEQA/NEPA processes. He prepares preliminary Big Chico Creek Storm Damage Repair—Two Sites environmental studies, oversees technical documents, Chico,CA conducts endangered species consultations, writes Senior Environmental Planner I The City of Chico intends environmental documents, and prepares permit to repair two storm damaged bridges on Big Chico Creek. applications.Jeff works with public agency staff to identify The work is partially funded through FEMA. Formal design and construction solutions that minimize or avoid Section 7 consultations are needed with USFWS and impacts whenever possible. NOAA Fisheries. Jeff is preparing regulatory permits for Stevenson Road Bridge Rehabilitation I Solano County, the repair work. CA Laguna Creek Trail Overcrossing New Bridge I Elk Grove, Environmental Lead I Solano County selected Dokken CA Engineering to assist with permitting and construction Senior Environmental Planner I The City of Elk Grove monitoring for the rehabilitation of the historic bridge intends to close a gap in the Laguna Creek Trail system by over Putah Creek on Stevenson Bridge Road.The bridge is constructing a new bridge over Highway 99 and a trail locally known as "Graffiti Bridge." Jeff is supporting the extension. Funding for a new bridge was secured and the County with obtaining a Central Valley Flood Protection environmental process commenced. Jeff prepared the Board Encroachment Permit with a Corps' Section 408 Community Impact Assessment for the project. approval. Other resource agency permits include a Corps' Nationwide Permit, Regional Board Water Quality Additional Relevant Experience Certification, and a CDFW Streambed Alteration • City of Roseville 16 Bridge BPMP, Placer County,CA Agreement. He managed the preparation of a • Trinity County HSIP Cycle 8 Guardrails,Trinity County, Supplemental Biological Assessment for NEPA CA revalidation. Construction support services include the . Mariposa County 25 Bridge BPMP, Mariposa County, transplantation of elderberry shrubs, preconstruction CA surveys, and implementation of permit requirements. • Placer County HSIP Cycle 7 19 Intersections, Placer Construction is scheduled for 2026. County,CA Coastal Rail Trail from Oceanside Boulevard to Morse • City of Stockton 6 Bridge BPMP, San Joaquin County, Street I Oceanside,CA CA Senior Environmental Planner I The City of Oceanside intends to close a gap in the Coastal Rail Trail by constructing a bridge over Loma Alta Creek adjacent to Buccaneer Park. Funding for a new bridge was secured and the environmental process commenced. Jeff is �PONWE N 23 - 192 8/4/2&&67 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Lori Burne, PE, SE approximately 50 feet tall (maximum exposed height). Provided Quality Control Plan and QC of PS&E.All project STRUCTURE DESIGN Deliverables were reviewed for completeness, EDUCATION coordination with other disciplines, and incorporation of 1999, Master of Science, UC Davis written comments made during internal and external 1993, BS Civil Engineering, UC Davis technical and constructability reviews. LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS Santa Monica Pier Widening and Modification I Santa 1998, California Professional Civil Engineer,#C58412 Monica,CA 2013,California Professional Structural Engineer,#S6053 Project Manager I Responsible for the design of an EXPERIENCE addition and modifications to the existing timber pier to 25 years accommodate the new Colorado Avenue Bridge width. The existing pier was required to be strengthened in areas AVAILABILITY to support vehicle live loads. A new steel railing was also 20/ added to the timber pier. Sacramento Viaducts Deck Rehabilitation Design-Build ■„? Ms. Lori Burne, a licensed Structural "Fix50" I Sacramento,CA y Engineer, has over 25 years of experience in the structural design, Design Quality Validation Manager I Ms. Burne served as rehabilitation, retrofit, inspection, Design Quality Validation Manager for this award- and construction of highway bridges winning, major interchange design-build project for Caltrans District 3. The project included multi-polymer and buildings. She is familiar with p � Caltrans' current design standards and and polyester concrete overlays on portions of the US-50 detailing formats as well as Caltrans' procedures for local and 1-5 mainline, ramps and connectors as well as joint assistance projects. She has field construction experience replacement and deck drainage system improvements. in both highway bridges and building structures having 1-10/605 Interchange Improvements Design-Build I provided construction support and inspection services. Baldwin Park,CA Transportation work includes the structural design and independent check of bridge, culvert, and retaining wall Design Quality Assurance Manager I Ms. Burne served as structures, seismic analysis, project specifications, Design Quality Assurance Manager for this major condition assessment of existing bridges and buildings, interchange design-build project for Caltrans District 7. construction inspection, advance planning studies, and The project will replace the existing at-grade southbound software development for bridge and culvert structures. connector with a one-lane flyover direct connector, As Principal-in-Charge, Lori Burne provides company-wide realign portions of the interchange connectors, and structural engineering design oversight and guidance of modify portions of Dalewood Street in the City of Baldwin the engineering professionals in Burne Engineering. Lori Park. performs a QA/QC review of all major submittals for Burne Amador Creek Bridge/Historic Building I Amador City, Engineering projects. CA Bridge Preventative Maintenance Repairs I Calaveras Project Engineer I Provided the structural design of the County,CA relocation and strengthening of the existing Historic Project Manager I Burne Engineering was responsible for Firehouse Building. Conducted field reviews, condition the structure portion of the PS&E for the maintenance assessment, and provided construction support and repairs of nine county-maintained bridge structures. The inspection services. This project was funded by HBP. scope of the work included polyester concrete overlays, Curry Creek Bridge Sutter County,CA joint seal replacements, bearing replacements, clean/paint structural steel, remove/replace unsound Project Engineer Served as Project Engineer for the concrete,and clean/paint bridge railings. delivery of the PS&E package covering the design and construction of a two-span reinforced concrete slab Bluff Creek Retaining Wall I Humbolt County,CA bridge and 1000 feet of roadway on Pleasant Grove Road CA/QC Manager I Responsible for Quality Control for this over Curry Creek as part of the replacement of the existing retaining wall project for Caltrans District 59, Soldier Pile bridge. Also provided construction support and Ground Anchor wall approximately 173 feet long and inspection services for the County during construction. This project was funded by HBP. gDONNE N 23 - 193 8/4/29268 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Rebecca Silva Downtown San Luis Obispo,California.The existing single- span reinforced concrete T-beam 15 girder structure was HAZARDOUS MATERIALS determined to be structurally deficient and would be EDUCATION replaced with a single-span, post-tensioned slab bridge 1992, BS Soil and Water Science, UC Davis supported on two end abutments. Along with the Marsh Street Bridge, our ISA also included the Marsh Street LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS roadway,a bank parking lot,a park,and a few commercial OSHA:40-Hour HAZWOPER buildings. Existing utilities (water, sewer, electric, gas, OSHA:8-Hour Refresher Training etc.) are carried by, passing under, or alongside the OSHA:8-Hour Supervisor Training existing bridge. The ISA was performed to evaluate the EXPERIENCE potential presence of contamination and hazardous waste 33 years facilities within and adjacent to Marsh Street Bridge that may impact the construction of the proposed bridge AVAILABILITY replacement. Ms. Silva performed report review and 40% general consultation. Santa Fe Avenue Bridge over Tuolumne River Bridge Ms. Rebecca Silva has over 33 years of Replacement I Stanislaus County,CA experience with Geocon performing �•,;. `�" t� project coordination and Senior Scientist/Project Manager I Ms. Silva served as I management of soil and groundwater senior scientist/project manager for an ISA for the investigations. Ms. Silva prepares proposed replacement of the existing Santa Fe Avenue project documents from proposals and Bridge over the Tuolumne River,east of State Route 99 and work plans to reports,documenting findings the City of Modesto. The bridge was determined to be and presenting conclusions and recommendations. Ms. seismically deficient as well as functionally obsolete due to Silva efficiently manages quarterly groundwater its non-standard width and non-crash-rated railing. The monitoring at numerous sites. Throughout Ms. Silva's County proposed to either seismically retrofit and widen career, she has developed strong working relationships the bridge or replace it.The ISA was performed to evaluate with clients and regulators to provide cost-effective the potential presence of contamination and hazardous services. waste facilities within and adjacent to the project site that may impact right-of-way and temporary construction Twin Cities Road Bridge over Snodgrass Slough easement acquisition and construction of the proposed Sacramento County,CA roadway and bridge improvements. A preliminary site Senior Scientist/Project Manager I Geocon performed investigation was recommended prior to final design and environmental soil sampling services for the proposed construction. The County later decided to replace the bridge replacement/modification of the Twin Cities Road bridge. Ms. Silva conducted laboratory assignments and Bridge at Snodgrass Slough located in southern report preparation. Sacramento County. The County of Sacramento is Caltrans Bridges and Structures,Asbestos, Lead,PCB, proposing to replace or modify the existing bridge along and Sandblast Surveys I North&Central Regions,CA Twin Cities Road.The purpose of this sampling activity was to evaluate whether impacts due to heavy metals Senior Scientist I Ms. Silva provides technical and field (including aerially deposited lead [ADL] from motor service management for various structure surveys vehicle exhaust)and petroleum hydrocarbons, pesticides, throughout Northern California. Geocon has completed and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) associated with a hundreds of asbestos and lead-containing paint (LCP) former railroad alignment exist in the surface and near surveys for Caltrans. Existing Caltrans structures surveyed surface soils within the bridge approach areas. Ms. Silva include bridges, maintenance stations, salt and sand was the senior scientist/project manager and conducted storage facilities, rest stops, weigh stations, retaining report preparation and laboratory assignments. walls and pump houses, and commercial and residential properties planned for right-of-way acquisition. The Marsh Street Bridge over San Luis Obispo Creek Bridge residential and commercial properties have included Rehabilitation/Replacement I San Luis Obispo,CA single- and multi-family developments, and auto repair, Senior Scientist I Ms. Silva served as senior scientist for office, and hotel facilities. Related efforts included soil an Initial Site Assessment(ISA)for the replacement of the evaluations for deteriorated LCP and sandblast residue Marsh Street Bridge over San Luis Obispo Creek in beneath and near bridges. �11D@(KK1E N 23 - 194 8/4/2&&69 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Kamran Amin!, PhD, PE development and optimization; and thermal control plan development using two-dimensional finite difference CONCRETE TESTING method, service life analysis, Nondestructive testing EDUCATION (NDT), and pavement engineering. Notable projects may 2018, PhD Civil Engineering, Iowa State University include NDT evaluation of bridge soffit at Barstow 1st Ave 2015, MS Civil Engineering,Cleveland State University Bridge built by the San Bernardino County Transportation Ongoing, MBA, University of Illinois Authority(SBCTA),in cooperation with the City of Barstow and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad, and LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS service life analysis of drilled Pier- Plug Concrete for San 2023,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C95725 Diego Gas&Electric(SDG&E). PCI Quality control Personnel—Level 1 Quality Assurance and Source Inspection Services EXPERIENCE (Contract 59A1336),Caltrans I Northern California,CA 15 years Subject Matter Expert/Staff Engineer/Materials AVAILABILITY Engineer I Dr. Amini brings extensive materials 100% engineering and technical expertise to the evaluation of material specifications, providing insights and guidance in Dr. Kamran Amini is a seasoned addressing project-specific challenges. He actively construction materials and structural mentors junior staff and METS(Materials Engineering and engineer with more than 15 years of Testing Services) representatives, assisting them in experience. He is an expert in design, identifying solutions to complex issues as they arise. production, and evaluation of special Professional and Technical Specialist Engineering concretes and utilization of several non- Services(Contract 59A1338),Caltrans I Statewide,CA destructive test methods. He is vastly experienced in engineering design from the initial Subject Matter Expert/Staff Engineer/Materials conceptual stage,through feasibility study and to detailed Engineer I Dr.Amini provides materials engineering and design. He is knowledgeable of standards and test technical expertise for the evaluation of material methods related to construction materials, non- specifications,the investigation of innovative materials destructive testing,and condition assessment.In addition, and test method standards,and the development and Dr. Amini is knowledgeable of the following standards: delivery of materials related training. He works with ASTM, AASHTO, RILEM, FIB 34. He is also knowledgeable various groups within METS and advises and proposes of MATLAB,JMP,and Design Expert(Statistical Design and criteria for the adoption of national test method Analysis of Data). standards and generates draft specifications and material Various Projects I Los Angeles,CA recommendation reports. Dr.Amini provides technical support for the effective implementation of sustainability Principal & Senior Consultant I Dr. Amini performs and performance-based specification in advance of project document and specification review; material Pavement and Materials Partnering Committee(PMPC) development and optimization; concrete mixture design efforts. �I�@(KKiE N 23 - 195 8/4/2&'&'60 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A PROPOSED WORK PLAN PROJECT APPROACF The City of Santa Ana (City) is seeking Professional Engineering Design Services for eight(8) bridges throughout the City.The Caltrans Local Assistance Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) established under the Highway Bridge Program (HBP)serves to extend the life of local agency bridges and delay the need for full rehabilitation or replacement by performing certain qualifying preventative maintenance work. The City has selected eight bridges to develop Plans,Specifications& Estimate (PS&E) based on recommendations provided through regular Caltrans Bridge Inspections (BIRIS). The City has provided a 2020 BPMP Work Plan to include anticipated bridge work. The work identified is limited to the bridge deck surface including work such as application of methacrylate, cleaning and replacing expansion joints,chaining of the deck and coring and testing the deck for chloride content. The most current inspection reports indicate additional work recommendations that aren't reflected in the 2020 BPMP Work Plan.To conform to current standards and inspection criteria,these recommendations will be included in the proposed work activities. These additional work recommendations include repairing substructure concrete spalls, painting of steel components and repaving approaches. Dokken Engineering will perform site assessments along with researching project as- builts and inspection reports to verify the listed work activities The project is federally funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through the Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and administered by Caltrans Local Assistance. Funding authorization has been obtained for Preliminary Engineering (PE) do phase. As such, the project must meet the guidelines and - requirements of the HBP. 4f We will review and verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided 2020 BPMP Work Plan and most /F w recent inspection Reports. We will perform a field review and identify all other maintenance work to conform with Caltrans / inspection criteria.Any additional work identified will be categorized whether it qualifies or not to be included in the BPMP. If the City wishes to pursue adding these additional recommendations to the scope,we have extensive and recent experience supporting agencies in submitting the Local Assistance Program Guidelines(LAPG)Forms 6A and 6D to request the anticipated funding to accommodate the additional work. It is anticipated that these forms will need to be submitted regardless, due to the escalated design and construction costs exceeding the currently programed values. The Dokken Team has reviewed the documents provided in the RFP, requested scope of work,and bridge inspection reports gain a full understanding of the project and identify key constraints of the design. The following table summarizes the key project issues and describes the benefit the Dokken Team will bring to the City, which is further discussed on the following pages. EnTuff, M Structures Most recent BIRIS provides The Dokken team proposes to perform a The Dokken team has extensive recommendations not photo documented assessment of each of the experience with Bridge Preventive currently scoped into City's City's identified bridge sites during the Maintenance work and is prepared to BPMP that are eligible for Preliminary Design task to evaluate existing incorporate any additional work items Federal reimbursement conditions and inform the City on whether that may be warranted. Dokken the additional and previous recommendations Engineering is well versed in getting such as methacrylate overlays and concrete additional scope of work items bridge deck coring are warranted. Additional programmed for Federal funding,and HBP eligible work items can be programmed has experience preparing LAPG forms 6A through Local Assistance Program Guidelines and 6D for our local agency clients to (LAPG)forms 6A(scope definition)and 6D submit to Caltrans Local Assistance. (scope/cost/schedule change)to receive Federal Reimbursement. �I'D ONKIE N 23 - 196 8/4/2r261 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A e Traffic control during special Dokken Engineering will coordinate The Dokken team has experience site investigations permitting and have traffic control for bridge engaging stakeholders regarding deck evaluation and testing. The Dokken temporary traffic impacts as well as team will keep traffic disturbances to a preparing appropriate encroachment and minimum and coordinate frequently with all regulatory permit applications and traffic stakeholders to maintain schedule. handling procedures during the design phase to facilitate safe site investigations. State and Federal Procedures Knowledge of the Federal Following State and Federal guidelines is key Dokken Engineering works exclusively on Aid process. to receive funding through the available transportation projects that require State and Federal programs.The compliance with State and Federal development of PS&E must follow standard regulations. We have a proven track Caltrans, HBP and FHWA requirements, record of project delivery over 3000 which include obtaining E-76 approvals,and projects and are familiar with every step compliance with NEPA and full compliance of the Federal process and the approval with Chapter 11 of the Local Assistance requirements. Program Guidelines. Utility Mapping and Coordination Construction can be delayed Utility base mapping and coordination While utility conflicts are not anticipated due to lack of utility efforts will be prioritized from the beginning for the programmed BPMP work, coordination and conflict of project design by following a utility providing utility base maps and clear identification. coordination process(Letter#1 and#3). communication to utility companies will Located utilities will be identified on the ensure appropriate measures are taken project plans and noted in the project to protect their facilities in place without specifications to ensure the construction causing delays to construction. contractor is aware of existing facilities and clearances. Stage Construction Construction will require When possible,construction activities Providing continued access during staged traffic lane closures covering the entire bridge deck(such as construction will benefit motorists since impacting public travel. methacrylate overlays)will be staged to no detours will be required. Maintaining Closure impacts will vary by always maintain two-way vehicular and access to driveways for businesses bridge depending on bicycle/pedestrian traffic along the bridges. reduces economic impacts related to anticipated construction If needed, Dokken will work with the City to traffic delays. Dokken has extensive activities,different number identify closures and/or flagging on a bridge- experience evaluating different closure of lanes,volume,and by-bridge basis to best accommodate alternatives to minimize impacts. proximities to intersections. motorists during. Traffic handling plans will Considerations will be taken for road accommodate driveway and intersection classifications, medians,construction access for nearby residential and business staging,adjoining intersections and properties to maintain access. traffic signals. Environmental Compliance with NEPA and Identify work limits and environmental Dokken has long history of working CEQA required to utilize impacts early.Organized tracking of both closely with cities and design teams for federal funding. project wide and bridge specific permits. early identification of environmental impacts and obtaining environmental clearances without project delays. STRUCTURES The successful approach to this project will be to provide plans that define the overall work and at the same time, highlight the unique details of each site clearly. The plans will also allow the contractor to streamline their means and methods of construction.We anticipate providing individual General Plan sheets defining all work to be performed,coupled with focused details where applicable, particularly for joint seal replacements, spall repair work and work on bridge railings and substructural components. We will clearly identify all information regarding the above-grade, at-grade and below-grade modifications,all exposed and underground utilities, manholes,gate valve boxes and survey monuments. �11DONKE N 23 - 197 8/4/2r262 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A We are very familiar with appropriate joint seal �.y cleaning procedures and repair materials. In addition, art ka we have developed relationships with industry representatives that will assist with unusual __ conditions such as coring and testing bridge decks. Construction cost estimating for these types of projects can be particularly difficult due to the small - scale of required work. Our depth of experience on bridge preventive maintenance projects will assist the City with accurately estimating and budgeting costs for these projects. The BPMP work plan has identified two bridges to perform deck coring to test for chloride content. Coring and destructive testing should be limited only for bridges that would benefit and alter their maintenance activities based on the results. The bridge decks will be assessed to verify whether it is warranted to determine a proper rehabilitation plan.Coring decks in good condition preemptively would be an unnecessary cost,as well as result in unnecessary patches and traffic impacts.Deck cores would be tested (per ASTM C1152) for chloride concentrations at different depths within the concrete. If the chloride concentration exceeds the threshold at the depth of the reinforcement,sealing the deck won't prevent future corrosion and a more extensive deck rehabilitation may be needed. STAGE CONSTRUCTION Due to large traffic volumes,providing access during construction is of high importance providing safe work zones to protect construction crews and maintaining vehicular traffic and driveway access to nearby businesses must be planned to minimize disruptions. and will be maintained where feasible. The bridges include a variety of multi-lane roadways, ranging from two lanes to seven lanes. For the eight locations identified, the existing bridge width varies from 51-feet to 102-feet, including sidewalks. Bridges immediately adjacent to intersections will require unique construction/temporary signing and N signaling.Signs will be placed ahead of the work to alert A IL motorists per the most recent version of the California 6' - :zo MUTCD. Full closure alternatives may be evaluated by using either detours or limited night work. Traffic handling for BR# 55C-0055 will encroach into Caltrans Right-of-Way and affect 1-5 offramp operations. An Encroacment Permit will be obtained from the Caltrans District 12 to facilitate stage construction and traffic handling. STATE AND FEDERAL PROCEDURES The City plans to utilize BPMP funds obligated through the Highway Bridge Program (HBP). Following State and Federal guidelines is key to keep federal funding intact.To not jeopardize reimbursement and eligibility, it is critical that the project delivery strictly adheres to the requirements and timelines presented in Chapter 11 of the Caltrans Local Assistance Program Guidelines. Therefore,the development of plans,specifications,and construction cost estimate(PS&E)must follow standard Caltrans (State) and FHWA requirements which include obtaining E-76 approvals, and compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) and full compliance with Chapter 11 of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines. Every Dokken Engineering project requires coordination and compliance with State and/or Federal regulations. Dokken's team of experts have extensive experience working with Caltrans, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal and State Resource Agencies and have a thorough understanding of regulatory processes and standards. Our team understands the Caltrans and FHWA project development process and has obtained invaluable insight into the local agency side of project funding, programming, authorization paperwork, and Federal regulations that apply to local agency project delivery with Caltrans local assistance oversight.We will use these skills and knowledge(from the delivery of over 3,000 projects)to ensure projects are successfully delivered and compliant with oversight agency requirements. Because the City is using federal funds for this project,the process to obtain project approval for funding and developing the PS&E package must follow standard Caltrans and FHWA requirements, which include compliance with NEPA/CEQA and authorizations at major milestones. �11DONNE N 23 - 198 8/4/2r263 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A The flow chart to the right identifies the Caltrans Local Assistance process and LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCESS demonstrates our understanding of the paperwork required.Since our team has a proven track record of project delivery, we know this process, not only when exhibits need to be submitted but also when FHWA holds all additional funding requests to close out their fiscal year. Federal Authorization(E-76) Depending on our client's needs, we are available to assist with preparing the for PE Request for Authorization (RFA) packages at all major milestones as well as project development forms (PES, Field Review, Project Change) and project Project Development delivery forms(utility coordination and right of way certification). Exhibit 6A PES Form Exhibit 713 Field Review In addition, Dokken's environmental staff has extensive experience with NEPA/CEQA policies and procedures.We have a close relationship with Caltrans environmental staff, and we will assist the City with all needed Caltrans Federal Authorization(E-76) for R/W paperwork.We will work closely with our design team to ensure projects do not have any unmitigable environmental impacts. We are prepared to address OMMM ME- NO project impacts by including reasonable avoidance and minimization solutions Negotiation and A quire R/W early in the project design phase. Lessons Learned Through our 39 years of experience, our team has gained knowledge from to Owner Exhibit 14E Report of Investigation several valuable lessons learned,which has helped us succeed in delivering our Exhibit 14F Utility Agreement clients' projects with Federal funds. • Have Right of Way Request for Authorization (RFA) reviewed by the Federal Authorization(E-76) District before the NEPA Environmental Document is signed. This for Construction streamlines the approval process whereby we meet with the District 01111111111111� near the end of the environmental process to ensure they understand Advertise,Award,ConstrUCt Project the project and its right of way needs. • Have Construction RFA reviewed by District before PS&E and right of way certifications are submitted. This step includes meeting with the District near the end of the design phase to ensure the District understands the project prior to obtaining their approval on the Construction RFA. • Prepare all utility paperwork in Caltrans format and meet early in the project with the Caltrans District Local Assistance utility coordinator. ENVIRONMENTAL The project will utilize both local and federal funding; therefore, compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)and the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)will be required.The lead agency under NEPA is Caltrans and the lead agency under CEQA is the City. Impacts to biological and cultural resources are not anticipated. The repair work contemplated for this project qualifies to utilize a CEQA Categorical Exemption for existing facilities. For NEPA,the Project is clearly classified as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under 23CFR 771.117 (d)(3) as bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement. Dokken's in-house environmental team obtains environmental approval for multiple bridge projects per year, such as the National Trails Highway 10 Bridge Replacement Project in San Bernardino County and has extensive experience working with Caltrans Local Assistance. Our relationship with Caltrans environmental staff ensures the NEPA environmental process will be driven by the City's schedule. Based on preliminary research,there are limited environmental constraints. The City has an extensive park and trail system. Publicly-owned parks are a resource under Section 4(f)of the Transportation Act. The Santiago Park Nature Reserve, the Santiago Creek Bike Trail and the Santa Ana River Bike Trail were also partially funded under Section 6(f)of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act;therefore,analysis for impacts to protected Section 6(f) resources will be required during NEPA clearance. Consideration should be given to facilitate park and trail activities during construction,even though the effects are of a short duration and temporary. Biological Resources Based on preliminary review, Dokken biologists determined that the proposed work does not have the potential to impact any threatened or endangered species or their habitat. Caltrans will likely require the preparation of a Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts) that would include standard avoidance, and minimization measures applicable to the proposed work. ��ONIKE N 23 — 199 8/4/��a E N G I N E E R I N G Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Permits Below deck work will be required in support of repair activities; however, maintenance work on existing, serviceable structures is considered exempt from Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting and non-exempt work can be authorized under the Regional General Permit (RGP) Number 100 issued to the Orange County Flood Control Division by the Corps of Engineers.Coverage under the RGP still requires filing a Notice of Intent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain a wastewater discharge permit, but this is an expedited process which is included in our scope and fee. Lastly, it is assumed that Orange County Public Works will utilize their existing Streambed Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that authorizes OCPW to conduct routine maintenance. Not having to obtain a USACE or CDFW permit will greatly reduce the City's environmental clearance schedule. Our project management approach is to be an extension of City staff and provide the City an experienced team. Our team will provide the resources and tools necessary to deliver this project with minimal oversight. Gabriel Hoxmeier will be the Project Manager for this project. As Project Manager, Gabriel will be responsible for communicating with the City and providing progress updates, schedule and budget control,facilitating meetings with the City and stakeholders, coordinating quality control activities, managing subconsultants,coordinating right of way acquisitions,and ensuring delivery of all project products culminating with a PS&E that is biddable and buildable. Dokken's project management philosophy is to treat every client as if they are our only client.We are immediately available by phone and e-mail. For us,project management means contract compliance,accurate file systems, budgets and schedules, and assembling the appropriate team to do the job right. It means monitoring subconsultant work, progress reporting, and assisting our clients with the hundreds of details involved with project delivery.Our project management approach includes: • "No Surprises" Communication with our Clients: Dokken maintains constant communication with our clients. Emerging issues are brought to our clients,along with proposed solutions. • Clear,Concise,and Complete Reporting: Dokken's monthly progress reports include accomplished tasks, upcoming tasks, pending issues, and scheduled completion target dates. We coordinate and facilitate regular progress and team meetings and prepare all exhibits and handouts. • Project Schedule Monitoring: Each of Dokken's projects is guided by a project baseline schedule, clearly indicating milestones, major activities, and deliverables at a level of detail appropriate to the project.The schedule drives the project, not the reverse. • Budget Control: The best way to control the budget is to follow the project schedule. This avoids costly over-runs and extended production times. The key to preserving budgets is to start on time, get it right, and submit the deliverable by the deadline. PROJECT COMMUNICATION As an extension of City staff, Gabriel and his team will use a suite of communication mechanisms to keep the City informed and to maintain the project schedule.The following diagram identifies the key communication methods to deliver projects for the City. 1 Weekly Internal I Focus Meetings to Team Meeting 3 Resolve Issues 5 Monthly Proiect Development Team 2 Weekly Email 4 Agency Meetings Update to City Meeting(PDT, Internal:Dokken has long-standing relationships with our subconsultants,and we have established communication protocols that all team members understand. We host weekly internal team conference calls to track progress and keep everyone current on project status and recent decisions that affect their awareness and productivity. External: Our number one goal when working with our clients is successful project delivery. We identify risks early in the process and develop ways to mitigate these risks. We work closely with our clients to keep them informed on the status of their project and any pending decisions,and we are extremely responsive to their needs. �11D ONKE N 23 — 200 8/4/2&26s E N G I N E E R I N G Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Dokken will also serve as an extension of staff on this contract and as requested can act as the principal point of contact for the City with stakeholders, resource agencies, and utility providers. Gabriel will ensure that the delivery schedule is being managed and that the City is controlling the project schedule and not the agencies. Gabriel will keep the City informed of communications with the outside agencies and elevate key decisions to City staff as required. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL Dokken and our team members are committed to the City to deliver project documents whose quality exceeds the standards in the industry. For our team, quality is not just a priority, it is a core value. The QA/QC procedures will be prepared and implemented in accordance with our scope of work and will be consistent with our company principles.The procedure will incorporate the approach of continuous review of products as they are developed and as a series of formal review procedures enacted at preparation of major deliverables.The policies and procedures will provide documentation that deliverables meet all requirements of the scope of work. The review of deliverables needed to satisfy the QA/QC procedure is built into our proposed schedule.The following flow chart outlines our QA/QC procedures: CH7di ER qualifieividual BACKCHECKEJnd QINATOR independe originator Reviews checker VERIFIER SUBMITTAL s document in reviews document for marked changes aConfirms the corrections Deliverable documentrm and deems technical adequacy and resolves differenchave been incorporated ready for submittalor checking conformance to corrections are ma withouterror standards originator We take quality very seriously, as a quality plan set provides the most competitive bidding opportunities for projects and helps keep projects within their overall budgets,ultimately resulting in a high-quality project being built,on time with minimal or no change orders. COST CONTROL AND BUDGETING METHODOLOGY To manage the three interdependent elements found in every project— scope, Project Scoping &Phasing schedule, and budget—it is necessary to implement a sustainable project control methodology. Gabriel, our Project Manager, will develop and implement the project controls plan. The plan outlines the procedures for conducting work, managing project resources, and reporting project status and progress. The project management tools identified on the right assures on time and within Deliverable budget project deliverables. These tools will enable Gabriel to provide a IF systematic approach to deliver any project. All project participants, including the City and Dokken team, will be aware of the project status in order to make informed management decisions. Our tools and system are designed to respond Project Management Plan to these requirements. Aonthly Cash Flow Projection Dokken prepares and maintains project schedules for every project.The schedules PF are monitored, and staffing adjusted to meet milestones. Performance is Risk Management Matrix monitored through quality control checks, review of actual versus planned Monthly Progress Report progress,completion of action items prepared after meetings, monthly invoicing, and progress reporting. Dokken will use the City standards and formats, making invoice review streamlined and familiar to the City. For our team,quality is not just a priority, it is a core value. Dokken has found that the best way to control budget is to ensure the project schedule is followed.This method avoids costly over-runs and extended production times. The key to preserving budgets is to start on time, get it right, and submit the deliverable on time. Utilizing the same design working group from the beginning of the project to the end ensures consistent thought and engineering practice,while eliminating wasteful hours spent"getting familiar"with a project. The MS Project Schedule will be supplemented with a deliverables schedule that identifies all project deliverables and submittal dates.The deliverables schedule is a critical project management tool because it specifies what is being delivered to the client and when it is to be submitted.The deliverables schedule will be updated monthly and submitted as part of the monthly invoice to report on the status of completed,in-progress,and upcoming deliverables.The combination of the budget and schedule showing task durations and sequencing will enable us to produce a time-phased budget. With a time-phased budget and a work-based method of measuring progress,a reliable comparison on planned versus actual can be made. �I'DON E N 23 - 201 8/4/29266 E N G I N E E R I N G Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A REFERENCES The following examples highlight Dokken's ability to provide services similar in size, scope, and complexity to the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program project.Together,with the technical specialties of our subconsultants,the Dokken team assures the City that our proven management and quality services will be provided. City of Palm Desert Bridge Maintenance I Palm Desert, CA The City of Palm Desert contracted Dokken to create and implement a City-wide Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program. As a first task, Dokken reviewed the Caltrans inventory of City owned bridges and existing maintenance agreements for each bridge within the City limits to identify any bridges that needed to be added to the Caltrans inventory and coordinated with Caltrans Structures Maintenance and Investigations (SM&I)to submit Request for Bridge Name and Number forms to allow unidentified bridges to be added CLIENT REFERENCE to the Caltrans inventory for routine inspection by Caltrans and eligibility for City of Palm Desert Highway Bridge Program (HBP)funding. Neal Ennis, PE Dokken reviewed all available Bridge Inspection Reports (BIRIS) provided by (760)776-6493 Caltrans and conducted photo documented field investigations of 17 vehicular nennis@palmdesert.gov and pedestrian bridges to confirm Caltrans Bridge Inspection Report findings, identify additional maintenance work recommendations not covered by the inspection reports, and develop preliminary construction cost estimates to perform the preventive maintenance work for each bridge. Dokken then collaborated with the City to develop a ranking procedure and prioritization plan complying with the Caltrans Bridge Preventive Maintenance Guidelines for Local Agencies, and summarized the findings in a Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program report.A comprehensive Bridge Preventive Maintenance Plan spreadsheet conforming to the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Guidelines, detailing bridge locations, applicable sufficiency ratings, work descriptions, and total HBP eligible participating cost share items was developed and submitted to Caltrans Local Assistance and Headquarters for approval and programming. Dokken worked closely with the City to develop a strategize a phased approach to implementing bridge preventive maintenance improvements given the City's budget allocations for maintenance over the next five fiscal years.The first phase of implementation included the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for the preventive maintenance of five vehicular structures.Work included concrete spall repair,expansion joint removal and replacement, installation of concrete expansion dams at select locations to prevent asphalt concrete overlays from fouling expansion joints, and the repair of a corrugated metal pipe arch (CMPA) culvert bank that included partial removal of damaged CMPA sections and splicing on new SCMPA sections utilizing a metal collar. Construction for the first phase was completed in November 2023.The second phase of implementation includes the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for the preventive maintenance of two vehicular structures, with an anticipated start of construction in Spring 2025. Proposed work includes a methacrylate overlay, existing joint seal replacement, and side-drain ditch repairs for the Tierra Del Oro bridge over the South Palm Canyon Wash, and asphalt concrete removal, methacrylate overlay, and new asphalt concrete overlay for the Palm Canyon Drive Bridge over the Rancho Mirage Channel. Approach roadway on both ends of the bridges will undergo a grind and overlay as a. part of this project. Stage Construction,Traffic ` \�1 Control, and Temporary Traffic Modification h plans are included as part of this work. �111)@(KK1E N 23 - 202 8/4/2r267 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Master Agreement Consulting Services - Structural Engineering I Carlsbad, CA 2016-2017 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program: As part of a Master Service Agreement contract, Dokken was tasked with reviewing existing Caltrans Bridge Inspection Reports, the existing Bridge Preventive d1w Maintenance Program (BPMP) report and conducting field investigations with accompanying documentation memorandum for 10 individual vehicular and pedestrian bridges scheduled for upcoming maintenance within the City of Carlsbad. Dokken worked closely with the City to determine immediate priority for bridge repair work,and developed PS&E for the preventive maintenance of the Calle Barcelona Pedestrian Overcrossing and the Poinsettia Lane Overhead; spanning over the North County Transit District (NCTD) owned tracks near the Pacific Coast. Plans and Specifications were also developed to replace the original bridge railings as well as repair the sidewalk approach railings which suffered from severe concrete spalling and corrosion from improper concrete cover over reinforcement and marine environment exposure. Railroad coordination was required due to work directly over NCTD tracks. 2018-2019 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program:The City of Carlsbad contacted Dokken Engineering for the PS&E for bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two � + structures. Jefferson Street Bridge involved providing a methacrylate overlay to seal existing deck cracks, replacement and repairs to existing bridge railings and metal beam guard railing approach systems, as well as — sidewalk remediation to meet ADA standards. El Camino Real Bridge at San Marcos Creek involved methacrylate overlay in multiple stages with traffic handling plans reviewed and approved by Caltrans to receive the Encroachment Permit to perform the work. Pressure grouting of deteriorated slopes below sidewalk curb i ramps was performed to mitigate more costly repairs in the future. 2022 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program — Field Review and Documentation Memorandum:This task included the review of the existing Bridge Inspection Reports(BIR),the existing Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) report to confirm maintenance work items and update the City's BPMP Prioritization list,and field CLIENT REFERENCE investigations and photo documentation of the remaining 24 bridges in the City of Carlsbad City's inventory not previously documented in the 2016-2017 program. Emad Elias, PE Maintenance needs in comparison with the existing BIRs and BPMP and close (formerly with the City of Carlsbad) communication with the City helped to determine the priority of bridge repair (760) 744-1050 x3225 works.A comprehensive photo-documented memorandum with itemized cost eelias@san-marcos.net estimates was prepared detailing recommended bridge preventive maintenance work for each bridge. �� 23 - 203 8/4/2r268 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals 13m Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Orange County Bridge Maintenance Orange County, CA Dokken is providing engineering services for maintenance on multiple bridges throughout Orange County. Plans, specifications, and estimates have been CLIENT REFERENCE prepared for maintenance repairs of 28 bridges. Project tasks included field Co Phung, PE Orange County Public Works inspections to identify repair needs,developing PS&E,attending meetings with (714) construction staff including Job Order Contracting(JOC)staff,preparing Erosion 245-4594 45 and Sediment Control Plans,and field visits during construction. co.phung@ocpw.ocgov.com Projects were selected from a previous study prepared by Dokken in which most County bridges were inspected, maintenance repair needs identified, and a repair prioritization list developed. Maintenance needs have included concrete spall repair, polyester concrete overlays,joint seal replacements,erosion control and scour measures, barrier rail repairs, approach sidewalk replacement, addressing drainage problem and resulting erosion,and epoxy crack injection. Repair projects of specific interest include: Kitterman Drive 55CO176 Kitterman Drive: Due to concrete RSP combined with extremely high creek velocities, localized scour was exacerbated downstream of the concreted RSP. In lieu of constructing a series of cut-off walls buttressed with large RSP over 300ft downstream, "" the fully grouted concrete rock slope protection was removed, the creek bottom was restored, and RSP along with hydroseed was provided along the creek banks to help - mitigate the undermining of the abutments and retaining walls. 55CO606 Oso Parkway: In addition to preventive maintenance needs, joint seal replacement and clearing and flushing deck drains, significant abutment slope embankment erosion was repaired and water dripping from a bridge cell was investigated. With the help of a manlift operator and a Confined Space Entry team, l Dokken inspected the bridge cell.The inspection revealed the water source was flowing from the detached electrical conduits,with water entering the conduits from beyond the .p bridge abutment. Maintenance repairs are ongoing. y , 55CO122 and 55CO123 Brea Canyon: The existing open window barrier is experiencing woo concrete spalling and decay.Since these bridges are scheduled for replacement,in lieu of total barrier replacement, nested double thrie beam was mounted to the face of the Brea Canyon barrier. This approach yielded significant cost savings and avoided environmental historical review of the barrier. `;.- 55CO631 Harbor Boulevard: A fire in front of the abutment caused precast girders to spall. Dokken inspected and categorized the spall locations and developed PS&E for the repair. 55CO017 Lincoln Avenue and 55CO097 Talbert-MacArthur:Approach sidewalks at both ` bridges had significant spalls and settlement due to bridge thermal expansion. Repairs included reconstructing the sidewalk to repair damage and meet ADA. 55CO572 Irvine Avenue: The top slab of this culvert/bridge has significant cracks and ,, ,'_-v, _- efflorescence is leaching onto the soffit. Repairs include epoxy crack injection into the soffit and wall crack. GARB FLEET COMPLIANCE Dokken Engineering and our subconsultants' vehicles are exempt from the CARB Fleet Compliance requirements and therefore cannot provide Certificates of Reported Compliance. Our team's Fleet Compliance Certification (Attachment J) is included in the Required Forms section of this proposal. Ia�ONKIE N 23 - 204 8/4/��9 E NGINEERING y gdE106 x erour'rnaoE ego" REQUIRED FORMS 00 1 _ Vol.wgck-14 . SSS 1 III i _ IIII I i I d r i City Council 23 — 205 8/4/2026 �.s EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT A PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION, PROPOSAL PRICING Certification - I certify that I have read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposals. I have examined the Scope of Services (Exhibit 1) and am qualified to provide services being requested as specified herein. I understand and agree that I am responsible for reporting any errors, omissions or discrepancies to the City for clarification prior to the submission of my proposal. PROPOSER'S STATEMENT: I have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions on all pages of the Request for Proposals. Upon request, I will transfer and deliver goods or services to the City in accordance with said terms and conditions. Dokken Engineering (916) 858-0642 / (916) 858-0643 LEGAL NAME OF COMPANY PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS 110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630 BUSINESS ADDRESS John A. Klemunes Jr., PE President PRINTED NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT TITLE Ad � 07/08/2025 jklemunes@dokkenengineering.com SIGNXrURE OF AUTHORIZE AGENT DATE E-MAIL ADDRESS 68-0099664 N/A FEDERAL ID NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER (IFAPPLICABLE) N/A CITY OF SANTA ANA BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER (PLEASE PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE, BUT NOT REQUIRED UNTIL AND IF AN AWARD IS MADE TO PROPOSER.) THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 206 8/4/2026 �.s EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT B PROPOSER'S STATEMENT Proposer understands and agrees that this written RFP (or any part thereof specifically designated and accepted by the City of Santa Ana, hereinafter City)shall constitute the entire agreement between proposer and the City only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Executive Director or his duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to proposer or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the proposer with the correct postage affixed thereto. Proposer further agrees that upon delivery(as defined above)of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish City all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and City's legal holidays), or the funds, check, draft, or proposer's bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the City and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by City because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered by City is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check drafts, or proposer's bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned. Proposer understands that a proposal is required for the entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the RFP schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing proposals, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. All terms contained in the specifications, the certification of nondiscrimination by contractors, and the required insurance certificates are to be incorporated by reference into this agreement and are made specifically as part of this RFP. Firm Dokken Engineering Signed and Printed Name: John A. Klemunes Jr., PE /✓ L �� Title President Date 07/08/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 207 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 ' CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT C NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the proposer declares that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price of the proposer or any proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the proposal price, or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the proposal are true; and, further, that the proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. Note: The above non-collusion affidavit is part of the proposal. Signing this proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this non-collusion affidavit. Proposers are cautioned that making a false certification may subject e certif" r to criminal prosecution. Signed State of County of Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of 20 , by . proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Sce- c;Act-cLkeA Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 208 8/4/2026 CALIFORNIA JURAT EXHIBIT 2 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness,accuracy,or validity of that document. I State of California ) County of Sg C ra YVn ) Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of v� vl 20 ZS by J0�Av,, �• 1�1tAAUAQ-S proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(' who appeared before me. CAMRAN SADEGHI COMM. #2473373 z %My Notary Public• Californiao zSacramento County Comm.Expires Nov.22,2027 Signature t (Seal) Optional Information Although the information in this section is not required by law,it could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this jurat to an unauthorized document and may prove useful to persons relying on the attached document. Description of Attached Document This certificate is attached to a document titled/for the purpose of Method ofAffiant Identification ` 1 Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence: 1`} O sclA+-'\ "�-A Gt 0 form(s)of identification 0 credible witness(es) Ak��CAA C— Notarial event is detailed in notary journal on: Page# Entry# Notary contact: Other containing pages, and dated ❑Affia nt(s)Thum bprint(s) ❑ Describe: O CopyrightGOYO"UWA ry,PO Box 41400,Des Moines,IA 50311-0507. All Rights Reserved 25 flu N n1884 Please contact your Authorized Reseller toW412 or this form �.s EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT D NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Signed: Title: President Firm: Dokken Engineering Date: 07/08/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 210 8/4/2026 �.s EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT E NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 1. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 2. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1)through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract City Council 23 — 211 8/4/2026 �.s EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). X The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Dokken Engineering Bidder's Com any Name (please print or type) �d IZL�Y1rZs, SignatiRe of Bidder John A. Klemunes Jr., PE Print Name President Title N/A DOORS ID *Dokken Engineering operates a standard fleet of vehicles that are not subject to the provisions outlined in the referenced regulation. Our fleet vehicles do not contain diesel trucks, off-road engines, etc. Therefore Dokken Engineering is exempt from this Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9. THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 212 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Burne Engineering Services, Inc Bidder'sCOmnanv Name (please print or type) Signature of Bidder Pranvera DeSafey Print Name Operations Manager Title N/A DOORS ID THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. City Council 23 — 213 8/4/2026 Burne Engineering operates a standard fleet of vehicles that are not subject to the provisions BIT 2 outlined in the referenced regulation. Our fleet vehicles do not contain diesel trucks, off-road engines, etc. Therefore, Burne Engineering is exempt from this Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9. City Council 23 — 214 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). X The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Geocon Consultants, Inc. Bidder's Company Name (please print or type) Si6hature of Bidder Josh Ewert, PG Print Name Vice President Title N/A DOORS ID THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 215 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 GEOCON CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Geocon is exempt because we will not be using any off-road vehicles or even diesel-fueled vehicles for this project.The only vehicles we're likely to use are trucks running on unleaded gasoline. City Council 23 — 216 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). X The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. OPTIME CONSULTING GROUP Bid ?.Co any Name (please print or type) Si na ure idder KAMRAN AMINI Print Name Principal Title N/A DOORS ID THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 217 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 C TIME nsu lting group June 29, 2025 OPTIME Consulting Group 7244 Hillside Ave, Unit 201 Los Angeles, CA 90046 To Whom It May Concern, Optime Consulting Group owns no off-road diesel equipment. Any gear we bring to the project will be electric or, if needed, rented equipment; we will operate no diesel off-road units, so Title 13 CCR§2449 does not apply, and no DOORS fleet ID is required. Sincerely, Optime Consulting Group Kamran Amini, Ph.D., P.E. Principal & Senior Consultant KAmini@OptimeCG.com Phone: +1 (216) 577 — 4173 City Council 23 — 218 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. Signed: /J Title: President Firm: Dokken Engineering Date: 07/08/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 219 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. Signed: Title: Operations Manager Firm: Burne Engineering Services, Inc Date: 06/27/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 220 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. Signed: Title: Josh Ewert, PG I Vice President Firm: Geocon Consultants, Inc. Date: June 30, 2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 221 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. /. A . . Signed: - L Title: Principal Firm: Optime Consulting Group Date: 6/29/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 222 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT I SAM.GOV UEI VERIFICATION On April 4, 2022, the federal government stopped using the DUNS Number to uniquely identify entities. Now, entities doing business with the federal government use the Unique Entity ID created in SAM.gov. They no longer have to go to a third-party website to obtain their identifier. This transition allows the government to streamline the entity identification and validation process, making it easier and less burdensome for entities to do business with the federal government. This RFP includes federal funding, and as such, the proposer must provide verification of their SAM.gov UEI and registration status. Please attach your entity's registration from SAM.gov, including UEI and active registration status. Proposer's UEI: DDLGPKSSAGQ7 SAM.gov Registration Expiration Date: 12/13/2025 City Council 23 — 223 8/4/2026 Last updated by Amber Smith on Dee 13,2024 ai 01.33 PH DOKKEN ENGINEERING ,�1_SAM*GGV® EXHIBIT 2 DOKKEN ENGINEERING Unique Entity ID CAGE/NCAGE Purpose of Registration DDLGPKSSAGQ7 1D7N3 All Awards Registration Status Expiration Date Active Registration Dec 13,2025 Physical Address Mailing Address 110 Blue Ravine RD 110 Blue Ravine RD STE 200 STE 200 Folsom,California 95630-4713 Folsom,California 95630-4713 United States United States tion Doing Business as Division Name Division Number (blank) (blank) (blank) Congressional District State/Country of Incorporation URL California 03 California/United States (blank) Registration Dates Activation Date Submission Date Initial Registration Date Dec 17,2024 Dec 13,2024 Jun 1,2000 Entity Dates Entity Start Date Fiscal Year End Close Date Jun 20,1986 Dec 31 Immediate Owner CAGE Legal Business Name (blank) (blank) Highest Level Owner CAGE Legal Business Name (blank) (blank) Executive Compensation In your business or organization's preceding completed fiscal year,did your business or organization(the legal entity to which this specific SAM record, represented by a Unique Entity ID,belongs)receive both of the following: 1.80 percent or more of your annual gross revenues in U.S.federal contracts, subcontracts,loans,grants,subgrants,and/or cooperative agreements and 2.$25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from U.S.federal contracts, subcontracts,loans,grants,subgrants,and/or cooperative agreements? No Does the public have access to information about the compensation of the senior executives in your business or organization(the legal entity to which this specific SAM record,represented by a Unique Entity ID,belongs)through periodic reports filed under section 13(a)or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C.78m(a),78o(d))or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986? Not Selected Proceedings Questions Is your business or organization,as represented by the Unique Entity ID on this entity registration,responding to a Federal procurement opportunity that contains the provision at FAR 52.209-7,subject to the clause in FAR 52.209-9 in a current Federal contract,or applying for a Federal grant opportunity which contains the award term and condition described in 2 C.F.R.200 Appendix XII? No Does your business or organization,as represented by the Unique Entity ID on this specific SAM record, have current active Federal contracts and/or grants with total value(including any exercised/unexercised options)greater than$10,000,000? Not Selected Within the last five years,had the business or organization(represented by the Unique Entity ID on this specific SAM record)and/or any of its principals,in connection with the award to or performance by the business or organization of a Federal contract or grant,been the subject of a Federal or State(1) criminal proceeding resulting in a conviction or other acknowledgment of fault;(2)civil proceeding resulting in a finding of fault with a monetary fine,penalty, reimbursement,restitution,and/or damages greater than$5,000,or other acknowledgment of fault;and/or(3)administrative proceeding resulting in a finding of fault with either a monetary fine or penalty greater than$5,000 or reimbursement,restitution,or damages greater than$100,000,or other acknowledgment of fault? Not SelecteCity Council 23 —224 8/4/2026 Mai,20,2025 03:30:47 PM GMT https://smri.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ7/coreData?s1atus=nu11 Page l qf3 Last updated by Amber Smith on Dee 13,2024 at 01.33 PH DOKKEN ENGINEERING EXHIBIT Active Exclusions Records? No I authorize my entity's non-sensitive information to be displayed in SAM public search results: Yes Entity Type,?� Business Types Entity Structure Entity Type Organization Factors Corporate Entity(Not Tax Exempt) Business or Organization (blank) Profit Structure For Profit Organization Socio-Economic Types Check the registrant's Reps&Certs,if present,under FAR 52.212-3 or FAR 52.219-1 to determine if the entity is an SBA-certified HUBZone small business concern.Additional small business information may be found in the SBA's Dynamic Small Business Search if the entity completed the SBA supplemental pages during registration. kinancial Inform", I Accepts Credit Card Payments Debt Subject To Offset No No EFT Indicator CAGE Code 0000 1D7N3 Electronic Funds Transfer Account Type Routing Number Lock Box Number Checking *******27 (blank) Financial Institution Account Number JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,NA *******33 Automated Clearing House Phone(U.S.) Email Phone(non-U.S.) 8134323700 (blank) (blank) Fax (blank) Remittance Address DOKKEN ENGINEERING 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 Folsom,California 95630 United States Taxpayer Information EIN Type of Tax Taxpayer Name *****9664 Applicable Federal Tax DOKKEN ENGINEERING Tax Year(Most Recent Tax Year) Name/Title of Individual Executing Consent TIN Consent Date 2021 Chairman Dec 13,2024 Address Signature 110 Blue Ravine RD STE 200 RICHARD DOKKEN Folsom,California 95630 Points of Contact Accounts Receivable POC 0 Amber Smith asmith@do y It oun 9168580642 Cl 23 —225 8/4/2026 Mav 20,2025 03:30:47 PM GMT https://smrc.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ71coreData.�status=mtll Page 2 qf3 Last updated by Amber Smith on Dee 13,2024 ai 01.33 Alf DOKKEN ENGINEERING Electronic Business 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 Cathy Chan Folsom,California 95630 cchan@dokkenengineering.com United States 9168580642 CATHY CHAN 100 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 cchan@dokkenengineering.com Folsom,California 95630 9168580642 United States Government Business 1. 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 Camran Sadeghi Folsom,California 95630 csadeghi@dokkenengineering.com United States 9168580642 John Klemunes,President 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 jklemunes@dokkenengineering.com Folsom,California 95630 9168580642 United States Past Performance 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 RICHARD DOKKEN,Chairman Folsom,California 95630 radokken@demail.com United States 9168580642 RICHARD LIPTAK,CEO 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 rliptak@demail.com Folsom,California 95630 9168580642 United States isrvr , NAICS Codes Primary NAICS Codes NAICS Title Yes 541330 Engineering Services Size Metrics IGT Size Metrics Annual Revenue(from all IGTs) (blank) Worldwide Annual Receipts(in accordance with 13 CFR 121) Number of Employees(in accordance with 13 CFR 121) $33,562,026.00 153 Location Annual Receipts(in accordance with 13 CFR 121) Number of Employees(in accordance with 13 CFR 121) (blank) (blank) Industry-Specific Barrels Capacity Megawatt Hours Total Assets (blank) (blank) (blank) ylectronic Data Interchange(EDI)Information This entity did not enter the EDI information This entity does not appear in the disaster response registry. City Council 23 —226 8/4/2026 Mai,20,2025 03:30:47 PM GMT https://smec.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ71coreData.�status=mtll Page 3 qf3 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT J CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INEGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, as amended, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension, 2 CFR Part 2998, Subpart C, Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988, Federal Register(Pages 19160-19211), and as subsequently amended in 81 Federal Register 25585. (Before completing certification, read instructions which are an integral part of certification) 1. Pursuant to 2 CFR 180.335, the prospective primary participant, (i.e. grantee) certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: a. Are not presently excluded or disqualified; b. Have not been convicted within the preceding three years of any of the offenses listed in 2CFR 180.800(a) or had a civil judgment rendered against them for one of those offenses within that time period. c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses listed in 2 CFR 180.800(a);and d. Have not had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or default. 2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Dokken Engineering Consultant John A. Klemunes Jr., PE, President Name and Title of Official Authorized to Certify On Behalf of the Consultant 07/08/2025 Date THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 227 8/4/2026 ,- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT K FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS — CALTRANS FORMS (Refer to the following Forms) City Council 23 — 228 8/4/2026 Local Assistance Procedures Manual ����� i t 10-01 Consultant Propt�-IDII+ p omtitment EXHIBIT 10-01 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: City of Santa Ana 2.Contract DBE Goal: 4% 3. Project Description: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight(8)bridges 4. Project Location: Various Locations in Santa Ana 5. Consultant's Name: Dokken Engineering,Inc. 6. Prime Certified DBE: 7. Description of Work,Service,or Materials 8. DBE a Supplied Certification 9. DBE Contact Information 10. DBE /o Number Burne Engineering,Inc. Structures Design 39259 5137 Golden Foothill Pkwy,Suite 100 6% El Dorado Hills,CA 95762 Local Agency to Complete this Section 17. Local Agency Contract Number: 11.TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION 6 18. Federal-Aid Project Number: Consultant's Ranking after Evaluation: IMPORTANT:Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on regardless of tier.Written confirmation of each listed DBE is this form is complete and accurate. required. AdZL 07/08/2025 21. Local Agency Representative's Signature 22• Date 02. Preparer's Signature 13. Date John A.Klemunes Jr.,PE (916)858-0642 23. Local Agency Representative's Name 24. Phone 14. Preparer's Name 15.Phone President 25. Local Agency Representative's Title 16. Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: Original—Included with consultant's proposal to local agency. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities,this document is available in alternate formats. For information call(916)654-6410 or TDD(916)654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814. LPP 18-01 Page 1 of 2 City Council 23 — 229 g/* &v 2019 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EX it t 10-02 Consultant Contract 1� Ommitment EXHIBIT 10-02 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: City of Santa Ana 2.Contract DBE Goal: 4% 3. Project Description: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight (8) bridges 4. Project Location: Various Locations in Santa Ana 5. Consultant's Name: Dokken Engineering 6. Prime Certified DBE: ❑ 7.Total Contract Award Amount: $757,183 8.Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: $167,833 9.Total Number of ALL Subconsultants: 3 10. Description of Work,Service,or Materials 11. DBE 13. DBE Supplied Certification 12. DBE Contact Information Dollar Number Amount Burne Engineering,Inc. Structures Design 39259 5137 Golden Foothill Pkwy,Suite 100 $48,183 El Dorado Hills,CA 95762 Local Agency to Complete this Section 20. Local Agency Contract $48,183 NiimhAr 14.TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION 21. Federal-Aid Project Number: 22. Contract Execution 6 % nata. Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, this form is complete and accurate. regardless of tier.Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required. 14d07/08/2025 23. Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date 19. Preparer's Signature 16. Date John A.Klemunes Jr.,PE (916)858-0642 25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26. Phone 17.Preparer's Name 18. Phone President 27. Local Agency Representative's Title 19.Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original—Local Agency 2. Copy—Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer(DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities,this document is available in alternate formats. For information call(916)654-6410 or TDD(916)654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814. Page 1 of 2 City Council 23 — 230 8/4?Z02114,2015 STATE OF CALIFORNIA•DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT 3 Local Assistance Procedures Manual PROJECT AUTHORIZATION/ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Page 1 of 2 DOT LAPM 3-A(REV 10/2024) Date Federal Project Number Local Public Agency(LPA) Caltrans Congressional 06/17/2026 BPMPL-5063(220) City of Santa Ana District 12 District 46 Project Contact Title Email Phone Alex Bangean Senior Civil Engineer abangean@santa-ana.org (714)647-5665 Project Title Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP)PE Phase HBP Project Location Various Locations in Santa Ana Bridge Number(s) 55C0055, 55C0423, 55C0115,55C0372, 55C0047, 55C0365, 55C0163, and 55CO689 Description of Work Chain Deck; Core Deck and Test for Chloride Content; Clean and replace joint seals; Apply Methacrylate to Deck Clean and Replace Longitudinal Joint and transverse expansion joints; Functional Classification Located Located CRS Map No. ITS Risk Project Oversight Estimated Phase Completion Date PED Other Principal Arterial ❑ on NHS ❑ on SHS N/A Locally Administered 03/16/2029 03/16/2030 Authorization ❑ PE ❑ R/W ❑ CON ❑ CE ❑ NI Advance CTC Allocation Federal Amount Adjustment ® PE ❑ R/W ❑ CON ❑ CE ❑ NI ❑ Construction ❑ Required Requested $282,400.00 Invoking Section 1440 of the FAST ACT? (aka At-Risk PE)? NO PROJECT FUNDING Previously Authorized Phase(s) ® PE ❑ R/W ❑ CON ❑ CE ❑ NI Federal Federal Federal State Match Local Match Advance Reimb. Fund Type Project Cost Participating Cost Funds Funds Funds Construction Other Funds Rate P/L Funds PE PREVAUTH $307,000.00 $307,000.00 $245,600.00 $61,400.00 80.00 ❑TC HBP $353,000.00 $353,000.00 $282,400.00 $70,600.00 80.00 L PE subtotals $660,000.00 $660,000.00 $528,000.00 $0.00 $132,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Project Cost $660,000.00 $660,000.00 $528,000.00 $0.00 $132,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Americans xi Qd1t7p13G*t(ADA)Notice:This document is available in alternative i&ssibk&'mats.For more information,please contEW402@12&lanagement Unit at(279)234-2284,TTY 711,in writing at Forms Management Unit,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814,or by email at Forms.Management.Unit@dot.ca.gov. STATE OF CALIFORNIA•DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Page 2 of 2 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION/ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Date Federal Project Number DOT LAPM 3-A(REV 10/2024) 06/17/2026 BPMPL-5063(220) REQUIRED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Include the following items with this form[(✓=required, •=required if applicable)]. This list does not represent all documents required to be in the LPA's proiect files. The District Local Assistance Engineer may request additional documents for authorization/adjustment. Project Document PE ADJ FTIP Document(Include CMAQ Emissions Benefits Calculations, Back-up List and EPSP • Approval if applicable) Cost-Effectiveness/Public Interest Finding (LAPM Exhibit 12-F) • For additional Federal funds requested for PE,provide justification(i.e. in the Remarks • section or in separate email or letter to the DLAE). RESPONSIBLE CHARGE CERTIFICATION I certify that the information provided in this request is accurate and correct.Any changes to the project scope, cost, or schedule will be communicated to the District Local Assistance Engineer. This LPA agrees to comply with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in Title 23, U.S. Code, Highways, and the policies and procedures promulgated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)and California Department of Transportation relative to the above-designated project. I understand that this LPA is responsible for all costs incurred prior to receiving authorization to proceed. In addition, this LPA will be responsible for all costs in excess of the federal and/or state funds encumbered to complete the above-designated project. Digitally signed by Alex A.Bangean Date:2026.06.17 15:34:54-07'00' 06/17/2026 Signature of Full-Time Public Employee in Responsible Charge Date Alex Bangean Senior Civil Engineer Print Name Title REMARKS Americans ORYW310l11109ik(ADA)Notice:This document is available in alternative a2assig232nats.For more information,please conta$Mi2@i2!6Management Unit at(279)234-2284,TTY 711,in writing at Forms Management Unit,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814,or by email at Forms.Management.Unit@dot.ca.gov. Return FULLY EXECUTED A-2017-042-17 Copy to City Clerk, M-30 PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. F178 Adv. Project ID Date: May 13, 2025 to 1225000089 Location: 12-ORA-0-SA ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT Project Number: BPMPL-5063(220) FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO 12-5063F15 E.A. Number: My Locode: 5063 This Program Supplement hereby adopts and incorporates the Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Administering Agency and the State on 04/28/2017 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is executed in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. 2017-005 approved by the Administering Agency on 02/07/2017 (See copy attached). The Administering Agency further stipulates that as a condition to the payment by the State of any funds derived from sources noted below obligated to this PROJECT, the Administering Agency accepts and will comply with the special covenants or remarks set forth on the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION: Bridge No. PM00187. Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP), various bridges in the City of Santa Ana. TYPE OF WORK: Bridge Related -Other LENGTH: 0.0(MILES) Estimated Cost Federal Funds Matching Funds Y001 $245,600.00 LOCAL OTHER $307,000.00 $61,400.00 $0.00 CITY OF SANTA ANA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation y ^ Q A. B�tz;tzuz ��B vG; Lfµ By Ferdinand A.Batatan(h9ay28,202509:48PDT) %Title Executive Director For: Chief, Office of Project Management Oversight Date OZ — Division of Local Assistance Attest Date 05/28/2025 ennifer L. II / Ci I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: 05/13/2025 Accounting Officer Date $245,600.00 Program Supplement 12-5063F15-F178-ISTEA Page 1 of 7 City Council 23 — 233 8/4/2026 12-ORA-0-SA SPMPL-5063(220) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. A. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the current published Local Assistance Procedures Manual. B. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will only proceed with work authorized for specific phase(s) with an "Authorization to Proceed" and will not proceed with future phase(s) of this project prior to receiving an "Authorization to Proceed" from the STATE for that phase(s) unless no further State or Federal funds are needed for those future phase(s). C. STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that any additional funds which might be made available by future Federal obligations will be encumbered on this PROJECT by use of a STATE-approved "Authorization to Proceed" and Finance Letter. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that Federal funds available for reimbursement will be limited to the amounts obligated by the Federal Highway Administration. D. Award information shall be submitted by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to the District Local Assistance Engineer within 60 days of project contract award and prior to the submittal of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S first invoice for the construction contract. Failure to do so will cause a delay in the State processing invoices for the construction phase. Attention is directed to Section 15.6 "Award Package" of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. E. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, as a minimum, to submit Invoices at least once every six.months commencing after the funds are encumbered for each phase by the execution of this Project Program Supplement Agreement, or by STATE's approval of an applicable Finance Letter. STATE reserves the right to suspend future authorizations/obligations for Federal aid projects, or encumbrances for State funded projects, as well as to suspend invoice payments for any on-going or future project by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for a six-month period. If no costs have been invoiced for a six-month period, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit for each phase a written explanation of the absence of PROJECT activity along with target billing date and target billing amount. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit the final report documents that collectively constitute a "Report of Expenditures" within one hundred eighty (180) days of PROJECT completion. Failure of ADMINISTERING AGENCY to submit a "Final Report of Expenditures" within 180 days of PROJECT completion will result in STATE imposing sanctions upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY in accordance with the current Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Program Supplement 12-5063F15-F178-ISTEA Page 2 of 7 City Council 23 — 234 8/4/2026 12-ORA-0-SA BPMPL-5063(220) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS F. Administering Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, age, disability, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any Federal-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE Program Implementation Agreement. The Administering Agency shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of Federal-assisted contracts. The Administering Agency's DBE Implementation Agreement is incorporated by reference in this Agreement. Implementation of the DBE Implementation Agreement, including but not limited to timely reporting of DBE commitments and utilization, is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this Agreement. Upon notification to the Administering Agency of its failure to carry out its DBE Implementation Agreement, the State may impose sanctions as provided for under 49 CFR Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.). G. Any State and Federal funds that may have been encumbered for this project are available for disbursement for limited periods of time. For each fund encumbrance the limited period is from the start of the fiscal year that the specific fund was appropriated within the State Budget Act to the applicable fund Reversion Date shown on the State approved project finance letter. Per Government Code Section 16304, all project funds not liquidated within these periods will revert unless an executed Cooperative Work Agreement extending these dates is requested by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance. ADMINISTERING AGENCY should ensure that invoices are submitted to the District Local Assistance Engineer at least 75 days prior to the applicable fund Reversion Date to avoid the lapse of applicable funds. Pursuant to a directive from the State Controller's Office and the Department of Finance; in order for payment to be made, the last date the District Local Assistance Engineer can forward an invoice for payment to the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office for reimbursable work for funds that are going to revert at the end of a particular fiscal year is May 15th of the particular fiscal year. Notwithstanding the unliquidated sums of project specific State and Federal funding remaining and available to fund project work, any invoice for reimbursement involving applicable funds that is not received by the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office at least 45 days prior to the applicable fixed fund Reversion Date will not be paid. These unexpended funds will be irrevocably reverted by the Department's Division of Accounting on the applicable fund Reversion Date. H. As a condition for receiving federal-aid highway funds for the PROJECT, the Administering Agency certifies that NO members of the elected board, council, or other key decision makers are on the Federal Government Exclusion List. Exclusions can be found at www.sam.gov. Program Supplement 12-5063F'15-F178-ISTBA Pane 3 of 7 City Council 23 — 235 8/4/2026 12-ORA-0-SA BPMPL-5063(220) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 2. A. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall conform to all State statutes, regulations and procedures (including those set forth in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the Local Assistance Program Guidelines, hereafter collectively referred to as "LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES") relating to the federal-aid program, all Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) and 2 CFR Part 200 federal requirements, and all applicable federal laws, regulations, and policy and procedural or instructional memoranda, unless otherwise specifically waived as designated in the executed project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. B, Invoices shall be formatted in accordance with LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES. C. ADMINISTERING AGENCY must have at least one copy of supporting backup documentation for costs incurred and claimed for reimbursement by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit supporting backup documentation with invoices if requested by State. Acceptable backup documentation includes, but is not limited to, agency's progress payment to the contractors, copies of cancelled checks showing amounts made payable to vendors and contractors, and/or a computerized summary of PROJECT costs. D. Indirect Cost Allocation Plan/Indirect Cost Rate Proposals (ICAP/ICRP), Central Service Cost Allocation Plans and related documentation are to be prepared and provided to STATE (Caltrans Audits & Investigations)for review and approval prior to ADMINISTERING AGENCY seeking reimbursement of indirect costs incurred within each fiscal year being claimed for State and federal reimbursement. ICAPs/ICRPs must be prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in 2 CFR, Part 200, Chapter 5 of the Local Assistance Procedural Manual, and the ICAP/ICRP approval procedures established by STATE. E. STATE will withhold the greater of either two (2) percent of the total of all federal funds encumbered for each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or $40,000 until ADMINISTERING AGENCY submits the Final Report of Expenditures for each completed PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT PROJECT. F. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for PROJECT-related travel and subsistence (per diem) expenses of ADMINISTERING AGENCY forces and its contractors and subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid rank and file STATE employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules. If the rates invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY are in excess of DPA rates, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is responsible for the cost difference, and any overpayments inadvertently paid by STATE shall be reimbursed to STATE by ADMINISTERING AGENCY on demand within thirty (30) days of such invoice. Program Supplement 12-5063F15+178-ISTEA Page 4 of 7 City Council 23 — 236 8/4/2026 12-O RA-0-SA BPMPL-5063(220) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS G. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirement for Federal Awards. H. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree, that Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual PROJECT cost items. 1, Every sub-recipient receiving PROJECT funds under this AGREEMENT shall comply with 2 CFR, Part 200, 23 CFR, 48 CFR Chapter 1, Part 31, Local Assistance Procedures, Public Contract Code (PCC) 10300-10334 (procurement of goods), PCC 10335-10381 (non-A&E services), and other applicable STATE and FEDERAL regulations. J. Any PROJECT costs for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY has received payment or credit that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200, 23 CFR, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, and other applicable STATE and FEDERAL regulations, are subject to repayment by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to STATE. K. STATE reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT WORK and records and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with STATE by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records available for audit and copying as required by the following paragraph: ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and subcontractors, and STATE shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit by STATE, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of STATE or the United States all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts and ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall furnish copies thereof if requested. All of the above referenced parties shall make such AGREEMENT, PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, and contract materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire PROJECT period and for three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the STATE to the FHWA. L. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain a financial management system and records that properly accumulate and segregate reasonable, allowable, and allocable incurred PROJECT costs and matching funds by line item for the PROJECT. The financial management system Program Supplement 12-5063F15-F178-ISTEA Page 5 of 7 City Council 23 — 237 8/4/2026 12-ORA-0-SA BPMPL-5063(220) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices set to or paid by STATE. M. ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 2 CFR 200 if it expends $750,000 or more in Federal Funds in a single fiscal year of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance, N. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to include all PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTS adopting the terms of this AGREEMENT in the schedule of projects to be examined in ADMINISTERING AGENCY's annual audit and in the schedule of projects to be examined under its single audit prepared in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200. O. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a non-A&E contract over$5,000, construction contracts over $10,000, or other contracts over $25,000 [excluding professional service contracts of the type which are required to be procured in accordance with Government Code sections 4525 (d), (e) and (f)] on the basis of a noncompetitive negotiation for work to be performed under this AGREEMENT without the prior written approval of STATE. Contracts awarded by ADMINISTERING AGENCY, if intended as local match credit, must meet the requirements set forth in this AGREEMENT regarding local match funds. P. Any subcontract entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as a result of this AGREEMENT shall contain provisions B, C, F, H, I, K, and L under Section 2 of this agreement. 3. In the event that construction of this project of the initial federal authorization for right of way is not started by the close of the twentieth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the right of way is authorized, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall repay the Federal Highway Administration through Caltrans the sum of Federal funds paid under the terms of this agreement. Authorizing the ROW phase of a project as Advance Construction does not exempt the project from the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 108(a)(2), and 23 CFR 630.112(c)(1). 4. Appendix E of the Title Vl Assurances (US DOT Order 1050.2A) During the performance of this agreement, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and subcontractor, (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees to comply with the following nondiscrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to: Pertinent Nondiscrimination Authorities: A. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Program Supplement 12-5063F15-F178-ISTEA Page 6 of 7 City Council 23 — 238 8/4/2026 12-ORA-0-SA BPMPL-5063(220) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS Part 21. B. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); C. Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex); D. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; E. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); F. Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. 4 71, Section 4 7123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); G. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); H. Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; I. The Federal Aviation Administration's Nondiscrimination statute (49 U.S.C. 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); J. Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100); K. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq). Program Supplement 12-5063F15-F178-ISTEA Page 7 of 7 City Council 23 — 239 8/4/2026 lwnf I r2411 7 RESOLUTION NO. 017-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTA ARIA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE. PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY TO EXECUTE ALL PROGRAM SUIPPL.E=MENT AGREEMENTS REQUIRED By REVISED MASTER AGREEMENT NO. 12-v063F15 WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS BE rT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Sectlon 1, The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby firils, detemaines and declares as foilovvs: A. On Octoter 18, 2016. the City Daunoll approved the Revised Administering Agency-State Master Agreement No. 12-5063F15 for fed-erel-Aid projects with the California Department of Transportation (Cal"n ), which provides forthe City's reimbursement of federally funded transportation projects. E. The Revised duster Agreement No. 12-5G63F15 incorporates various changes In r&gulabons and policies. C. Under the Revised Master Agreament No. 12-5063F'I5, project-spec is Program Supplements are issued, and these Fmgram Sopplcmonts constitute the contractual basis for Caltrans to reimburse the City for federally funded transportation projects.. Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the Executive Director of the Public Works Agency to execute all Program Supplement AgreennenS, required by Revised Master Agreement No. 12-5063F'I 5, 5 o i This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adepticn by the City Council, and the Cleric of the{Council shall attest to and cartify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2017, Mi A. Puli .0 Mayor ResoluVon No.2017-005 Pagel of 2 City Council 23 — 240 8/4/2026 APPROVED AS TO FORM, SDnla R. Carvalho, City Attorney By,__ - J n M. Fdnk Assistant City Attorney AYES; Couricilmembers Martinez Pull u Solodo, O�iIIs t�} NOES- Council members Nora 0 ABSTAIN: Council member�; Norie 0 NOT PRESENT., Councllmembers I3enavides Tina` ro 2 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY 1, MARIA D- HUIZAlR, Cleric of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attachad Resolutlon No. 2017-005 to be the origirtai resolution adopted by the City Council of the +fifty of Santa Aria an February 7, 2017. bate_ 4 7 Maria L). Huizar Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana RasaluWn No.2017-W5 Pia 2 of 2 City Council 23 — 241 8/4/2026 5063220 PSA Final Audit Report 2025-05-28 Created: 2025-05-28 By: Gregory Nannini (s147991 @dot.ca.gov) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA6fDddPxt6vkoz96VrGtOAFe3-zdsvxma "5063220 PSA" History Document created by Gregory Nannini (s147991@dot.ca.gov) 2025-05-28-4:41:15 PM GMT-IP address: 149.136.17.251 Document emailed to Ferdinand Batatan (ferdinand.batatan@dot.ca.gov) for signature 2025-05-28-4:42:37 PM GMT Email viewed by Ferdinand Batatan (ferdinand.batatan@dot.ca.gov) 2025-05-28-4:42:48 PM GMT-IP address: 107.20.30.21 Signer Ferdinand Batatan (ferdinand.batatan@dot.ca.gov) entered name at signing as Ferdinand A. Batatan 2025-05-28-4:48:09 PM GMT-IP address: 149.136.17.249 Document e-signed by Ferdinand A. Batatan (ferdinand.batatan@dot.ca.gov) Signature Date:2025-05-28-4:48:11 PM GMT-Time Source:server-IP address: 149.136.17.249 Agreement completed. 2025-05-28-4:48:11 PM GMT Powered by ty �,i�sign 23 — 242 8/4/2026 + 4* E BIT 4 low BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM R F P NO. 25-081 A PROPOSAL _i i i SUBMITTED BY: J§DOKKEN A ENGINEERING Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE Project Manager 1450 Frazee Road, Suite 100 SUBMITTED TO: San Diego, CA 92108 ALEXANDRU BANGEAN, PE (858) 514-8377 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER ghoxmeier@dokkenengineering.com CITY OF SANTA ANA - M-36 20 ClYff C WTIRR PLAZA 23 - 243 W$MUC&D ON: SANTA ANA, CA 92701 July 8, 2025 DOKKEN ENGINEERING July 8,2025 DOKKEN ENGINEERING CONTACT Mr.Alexandru Bangean,Senior Civil Engineer Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE I Project Manager City of Santa Ana—M-36 Address: 1450 Frazee Road,Suite 100 20 Civic Center Plaza San Diego, CA 92108 Santa Ana,CA 92701 Telephone: (858)514-8377 RE: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Fax: (858)514-8608 BPMP RFP No.25-081A Mobile: (541)602-2960 E-Mail: ghoxmeier@dokkenengineering.com Dear Mr. Bangean: We are excited to grow our relationship with the City of Santa Ana. We have worked with many cities and agencies including City of Palm Desert, City of Carlsbad, Orange County,Tulare County and others where we have demonstrated our ability to deliver similar projects on schedule and on budget. We have a strong history of urban projects and understand the needs of the area. Dokken Engineering (Dokken) is pleased to submit to the City one (1) hard copy and one (1) digital copy of our proposal to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program. We wish to express our enthusiasm and commitment to deliver this proposal. Dokken has teamed with Burne Engineering to support engineering services, Geocon Consultants Inc. for Hazardous Materials Investigations and Optime Consulting Group for bridge deck testing to deliver a solution that meets the City's needs, complying with Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans Local Assistance Requirements. PROJECT EXPERIENCE I We have extensive recent experience completing Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) projects similar to the City's proposed improvements. Dokken has been working with the City of Carlsbad on BPMP since 2016, including PS&E for preventative maintenance of the Calle Barcelona Pedestrian Overcrossing,Jefferson Street Bridge, El Camino Real Bridge among other bridges involving methacrylate deck overlays. We are providing additional engineering services for Orange County, Tulare County and the City of Palm Desert for bridge maintenance projects that also include methacrylate overlay and additional bridge preventive maintenance work. Burne Engineering has joined our team to supplement our experience and expertise having recently completed PS&E for Calaveras County with similar BPMP efforts. Our combined experience will be key for the success and delivery of this project. The key staff and subconsultants proposed for this project have worked on similar recently completed HBP BPMP projects. Their collective understanding and experience with the HBP and Caltrans Local Assistance will ensure the project is delivered in full compliance with the program and participating funding is maximized. Their experience working in urban areas will be an additional asset to provide a more succinct design meeting the needs of the City as well as the motorists and users within the project area. PROJECT MANAGEMENT I Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE will lead the project delivery team as the Project Manager. Gabriel has experience managing design teams for PS&E packages for many cities. He is well versed in coordinating with, State agencies, Counties and Cities. He has experience ensuring the projects meet the federal and state requirements for local agencies to meet funding and application requirements. Gabriel provides local agencies with scheduling and project management services, ensuring the project schedule is maintained, and all submittals are made in full compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance and the HBP program. PROJECT APPROACH I The Dokken team has visited and researched the project sites and reviewed the bridge inspection reports to develop an approach to best deliver this project for the City. Based on the recommendations in the most recent bridge inspection reports, it is anticipated that work is to be performed both on the bridge deck as well as on the substructure or girders. Bridge deck work includes applying methacrylate to the deck surfaces and replacing joint seals. Substructure and girder work includes spall repair, cleaning and painting of steel components and debris removal. City Council 23 - 24 &4/2026 DOKKEN ENGINEERING Bridge deck work will require staged signing and traffic handling to maintain traffic operations during construction. Performing work underneath the bridge will utilize encroachment and environmental permits to allow construction access and work to be performed within the channels. Based on parcel data available, river and creek channels are within either City, Orange County Flood Control District or County Right-of-Way. Additionally, we anticipate that signage and partial roadway closures will encroach into Caltrans Right-of-Way. This stresses the importance of communication with all shareholders and early identification and resolution of potential issues early to maintain schedule. We have identified key project issues and solutions from a wholistic approach to ensure we meet the needs and goals of the City and all other shareholders. A top priority is to ensure we are meeting the federal and state requirements,frequent communication with all parties, identifying key issues and solutions early,to ensure the project stays on schedule. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS I Bridge Preventative Maintenance may imply routine or basic work; however, we still look for opportunities to innovate regardless of the scope of work. We believe the importance of brainstorming and evaluating alternative solutions of how work can be performed to explore innovative concepts to avoid pre-packaged solutions. Some examples may include: • Group separate bid packages for bridges based on similar scope and schedule to expedite project completion. • Specify unconventional construction methods to eliminate major environmental and ROW impacts. • Allow for detours,or night closures to expedite and simplify construction. Dokken Engineering's mission is to provide superior service to our clients for all their transportation and related civil engineering needs. We strive to be responsive and flexible to our clients, which results in projects being delivered on time and within budget. We appreciate your consideration of our proposal, and we are very excited for this opportunity to work with the City of Santa Ana. Sincerely, DOKKEN ENGINEERING Gabriel HoxmeZr� John A.Kle/munes,Jr., PE Project Manager President City Council 23 - �24 9W4 026 Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A TABLE OF CONTENTS ServicesProvided ........................................................................................................................................................... AgreementStatement ................................................................................................................................................... Firmand Team Experience ............................................................................................................................................. • Project Organization Chart ........................................................................................................................................ 11 • Resumes for Key Personnel ....................................................................................................................................... 12 ProposedWork Plan...................................................................................................................................................... 21 References.................................................................................................................................................................... 27 CARBFleet Compliance ................................................................................................................................................. 29 Attachments • Attachment A: Proposer's Certification, Proposal Pricing • Attachment B: Proposer's Statement • Attachment C: Non-Collusion Affidavit • Attachment D: Non-Lobbying Certification • Attachment E: Non-Discrimination Certification • Attachment F:Subcontractor Designation Form • Attachment G:CARB Fleet Compliance Certification • Attachment H:Statement Regarding Community Workforce Agreement(CWA) Requirements • Attachment I:SAM.gov UEI Verification • Attachment J:Certificate Regarding Debarment,Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion • Attachment K: Federal Funding Requirements—Caltrans Forms �]'ONKE N 23 — 246 TABL&4QQ2&s ENGINEERING Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program .I I-- RFP No. 25-081A SERVICES PROVIDED TASK 1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT(30%PLANS) Task 1.1 Project Coordination Dokken Engineering's project management will include regular virtual meetings, in-person deliveries, presentation of work products, development and monitoring of action items, monthly progress reports, work progress monitoring, budget monitoring, coordination and communication. Twelve (12) Monthly Project Delivery Team (PDT) meetings will be held with City staff and other representatives,as necessary,to discuss work progress,decisions made,schedule and considerations for the City. The Dokken Project Manager will work closely with the City Project Manager and continuously inform the City Project Manager of all project activities. The duration of the project management effort is expected to be continuous through completion of the job. Project management will include: leading, directing and monitoring the Dokken team; preparing for, attending,and documenting team meetings and action items;preparing,coordinating,and maintaining a critical path method schedule; preparing monthly progress reports, invoices and specific work completed; and miscellaneous coordination and support. The Dokken team will document key project decisions, assumptions, and action items in a centralized tracking system to ensure continuity throughout the project lifecycle and to support audit readiness for federally funded projects. Coordination—Close contact will be maintained between the Dokken Project Manager, all subconsultants, the City Project Manager, project personnel, and regulatory agencies. The Dokken Project Manager will act as the principal liaison between the City and staff at Dokken. Project coordination will include support for Federal-aid process compliance, including assistance with tracking key authorization milestones (e.g., E-76 requests), documentation requirements, and coordination of information necessary for Local Assistance approvals. Subconsultant coordination will include scope alignment, schedule integration, review of deliverables, and verification of consistency with overall project objectives and regulatory requirements. The Dokken Project Manager will coordinate internal quality control reviews across all disciplines to ensure consistency, completeness,and adherence to project standards prior to submittal. Communication — Effective communication through in-person visits, focused meetings, telephone calls and a-mails to the City will be performed to discuss specific project issues by the Project Manager. Regular communication with team members, the City and other agency personnel will be facilitated through the Dokken Project Manager. Progress reports will be submitted monthly to the City.These reports will include the work performed during that period, a discussion of issues/decisions, recommendations to address issues, budget status, and anticipated work for the following month. The progress report will be submitted with the monthly invoice. Dokken's Project Manager is responsible for maintaining cost control for each task, including our subconsultants. Project Schedule-Dokken will provide and maintain a detailed Milestone Schedule for the bridge and a less detailed program wide Microsoft Project Schedule. The Milestone Schedule is a simple one page schedule to assist in project communication Dokken's Project Manager will closely monitor the schedules and discuss updates with the City Project Manager. Task 1.1 Deliverables:Monthly Progress Report and Invoice;Meeting Agendas and Minutes;Action Item Lists;RFA and HBP Funding Support Information;Project Schedule TASK 1.2 RECORDS RESEARCH Dokken Engineering will research all information pertinent to the project such as existing field conditions,as-built plans and record drawings right-of-way and parcel data, and all future improvement plans adjacent to or affecting the project site. Dokken Engineering will identify all existing and proposed facilities within the project limits and potential conflicts. TASK 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Task 1.3.1 Preliminary Environmental Study(PES) Dokken will prepare a draft PES Form and will coordinate with Caltrans to setup a field review prior to approval of the PES Forms.The PES Form will include an environmental study area map as well as an environmental constraints analysis to identify key environmental impacts that could occur during construction. Once the draft PES Form is completed, it will be reviewed Rpo(NNEN 23 - 247 8/4/2&261 G I N E E R I N G ME11M Request for ProposalsBridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No. 25-081A by the City and Caltrans. The PES form will outline the recommended federal environmental documentation, technical studies, surveys,approvals,agency coordination,and permits required for the Project. Task 1.3.1 Deliverables:Preliminary Environmental Study TASK 1.3.2 Field Investigations and Hazardous Material Surveys Geocon and Dokken will assess each of the eight bridge locations(the sites)within the City. TASK 1.3.2.1 Phase I Initial Site Assessment(ISA) Dokken will perform an Initial Site Assessment(ISA) will be to determine the potential presence of environmental concerns and contaminated properties at the sites that may impact maintenance at each location. The primary purpose of the ISA is to assess the sites for the potential presence of recognized environmental conditions(RECs) (i.e., levels of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products warranting regulatory cleanup action) and the uses and conditions at properties and facilities in the site vicinities with the potential to cause(or have caused)an REC at the sites. For the purposes of this ISA,the "vicinity" of the sites is defined as properties/facilities within 1 8 mile of the sites. The ISA will be performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) Designation E 1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process. Potential environmental concerns and contaminated properties that are determined to potentially pose a significant impact to the planned improvements would be further evaluated during a subsequent(Phase II) Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI). As part of the Phase I ISA, Dokken will perform the following services including: • Perform a reconnaissance of the sites to assess for the presence, or make visual observations of indicators of the potential presence, of RECs on the sites.These indicators may include 55-gallon drums,underground and aboveground storage tanks,chemical containers, waste storage and disposal areas,industrial facilities,discolored surficial soils,electrical transformers that may contain polychlorinated biphenyls,and areas conspicuously absent of vegetation.If access is unavailable to any portions of the sites,our ability to complete the assessment described herein may be hindered. Assessment of the sites for wetlands, asbestos-containing building materials, lead- containing paint, lead in drinking water, radon, methane gas,and naturally occurring substances such as arsenic and asbestos are not included in the ISA services. • Perform a visual survey of adjoining and adjacent properties from the sites and from public thoroughfares to observe general types of land use and conditions surrounding the sites. • Review the Standard Environmental Records Sources: Federal and State as referenced in ASTM Designation E 1527-21 to obtain information regarding the potential presence of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products on the sites or on properties within the approximate minimum search distance specified for each source,reviewing reasonably ascertainable regulatory agency files for the sites and documented hazardous substance and/or petroleum product release locations near the sites.The sources for these files could include the local department of environmental health, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. • Review pertinent and reasonably ascertainable information sources to evaluate physiographic,geologic,and hydrogeologic conditions in the vicinity of the sites. • Review and interpret reasonably ascertainable historical aerial photographs to obtain information concerning the historical use of the sites and adjacent properties. • Review historical United States Geological Survey topographic maps to obtain information relative to the topography of the sites, as well as previous development and uses of the sites and properties located in the vicinity of the sites. • Review documents provided by the Client.Potentially useful documents may include geotechnical,geologic,and environmental reports, site plans,plot plans,and correspondence with regulatory agencies. • Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the ISA for the sites and qualitatively describing existing,or the potential for,RECs on the sites. TASK 1.3.2.2 Phase II Preliminary Site Investigation(PSI)Report This work is NOT included in this scope. Task 1.3.3 Natural Environmental Study(Minimal Impacts) A Dokken biologist will conduct fieldwork in order to assess the presence/absence of sensitive biological resources (e.g., species or habitats), or to determine the potential for occurrence of such resources. A literature search will be conducted. The location of any sensitive biological resources in the study area, including plants and plant communities,will be mapped. Surveys will be timed for the appropriate season,e.g. plant surveys during the blooming season. A Natural Environment Study(Minimal Impacts)(NES(MI))in the current Caltrans format will be prepared.The field methods will be described along with the field survey and literature search results. Plant and animal species observed will be listed, along with a general description of vegetative communities. Sensitive resources found will be mapped and evaluated in the NES(MI).The report will contain tables describing sensitive species and their habitats that are present or potentially present; FOR Pill D0NrK1E N 23 - 248 8/4/2&262 ENG IN EERING Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program .I I-- RFP No. 25-081A it will identify and assess project impacts on the existing biological resources, including any sensitive species. Mitigation measures will be included as necessary. Task 1.3.3 Deliverables:Natural Environment Study(Minimal Impacts) Task 1.3.4 Cultural Resources/Section 106 Compliance BPMP activities are oftentimes considered a "screened undertaking" and may be exempt from the Caltrans Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act(NHPA)compliance process. Task 1.3.4.1 Section 106 Compliance—Screened Undertaking Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans to determine if the proposed project activities qualify for a screened undertaking,which many involve some preliminary research, including a records search through the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), Native American consultation, and a pedestrian survey. This task assumes that no cultural resources that require recordation and evaluation for the National Register of Historic Places will be identified within the APE. Although the project may qualify for a CEQA exemption which does not require CEQA Native American consultation, should the City request it, Dokken can assist with the preparation of Project Notification Letters,per California Public Resources Code (PRC) §21080.3.1 (also referred to as AB S2). Dokken can assist the City with subsequent Native American consultation meetings, requests,and recommendations conducted under both Section 106 of the NHPA and PRC§21080.3.1 (AB 52). Task 1.3.4.1 Deliverables:Historic Property Survey/Archaeological Survey Report Task 1.3.4.2 Section 106 Compliance—Full Report(OPTIONAL) Should Caltrans not agree that the project qualifies as a screened undertaking, Dokken will conduct Section 106 of the NHPA cultural resource identification efforts.These efforts include delineation of an Area of Potential Effects(APE),Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search, CHRIS records search, historical research, Native American consultation, a pedestrian survey,and preliminary assessment of buried site potential within the APE.The results of the identification efforts will be documented in an Archaeological Survey Report(ASR)and Historic Property Survey Report(HPSR). Task 1.3.4.2 Deliverables:Record Search, Native American Consultation Log Task 1.3.5 Section 4(f)/Section 6(f) Documentation Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans and the City to verify that the project meets the definition of"temporary occupancy" for the purposes of completing the Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) documentation. Because the bridges are elevated over the parks and trails, except the W MacArthur Blvd bridge,the maintenance work does not conflict with the use of the parks or trails.A de minimis level of documentation is not anticipated.A letter report or memorandum will be prepared to document the findings and concurrence on the temporary occupancy finding will be requested from the official with jurisdiction over the parks and trails. Task 1.3.5 Deliverables:Section 4(f)and Section 6(f)Documentation Task 1.3.6 Water Quality Assessment Memorandum Dokken will prepare a Water Quality Assessment Report to address the potential for project impacts on water quality based on current Caltrans guidelines (Environmental Handbook Volume 1, Chapter 9, Water Quality). The report will discuss the waters within the project areas and the receiving waters conditions, objectives, and beneficial uses as well as Caltrans standard best management practices (BMPs) and project design features required in accordance with the current Caltrans Statewide Storm Water Management Plan.This scope and fee assumes that a full Water Quality Assessment Report will not be required by Caltrans. Task 1.3.6 Deliverables: Water Quality Assessment Memorandum Task 1.3.7 CEQA Notice of Exemption(NOE) Form and Evaluation Letter; NEPA Categorical Exclusion Based on identified type of maintenance work identified in the BPMP Plan and preliminary research, the proposed project qualifies for CEQA categorical exemption 15301 for existing facilities. Dokken Engineering will prepare a letter that evaluates whether there are any exceptions that would preclude the use of the CEQA exemption. If no exceptions exist,a CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE)for will be prepared for the City to file NOE. Dokken will file the NOE with the State Clearinghouse.This scope and fee include the$50.00 filing fee. Dokken will work with Caltrans Local Assistance to prepare a Categorical Exclusion as the NEPA approval document for the project and will include avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures provided in the technical studies prepared. Task 1.3.7 Deliverables:Notice of Exemption(NOE)Form and Recommendation Letter TASK 1.4 REGULATORY PERMITS &POKKEN 23 - 249 8/4/21263 ENGINEERING Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program .I I-- RFP No. 25-081A TASK 1.4.1 Section 401 Waste Water Discharge Permit Below deck work is needed for spall repair; however, such maintenance work of existing, serviceable structures is typically exempt from Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting. Non-exempt work may be authorized under the Regional General Permit(RGP) Number 100 issued to the Orange County Flood Control Division by the Corps of Engineers.Coverage under the RGP requires the filing of a Notice of Intent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for a Waste Water Discharge Permit and is included in this scope.The Orange County Public Works also has a Streambed Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that authorizes OCPW to conduct routine maintenance, and it is assumed a Verification Request Form is necessary to submit to CDFW. Dokken will prepare the Verification Request Form or applications and pay associated permit fees. Dokken will submit the forms or applications directly to the agency, or to the City as required. Dokken will prepare and submit applications for encroachment permits for Orange County Flood Control District(OCFCD) or other regulatory agencies,and pay associated permit fees.Dokken will submit the forms or applications directly to the agency, or to the City as required. Task 1.4.1 Deliverables:RWQCB Notice of Intent and Waste Water Discharge Permit,OCFCD Encroachment Permit TASK 1.5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TASK 1.5.1 Preliminary Design Concept Dokken will organize a kick-off meeting with the City staff to discuss the conceptual design plan, project goals and objectives, potential elements and issues,schedule, review of existing information,and conduction of a site investigation. The BPMP Plan includes eight(8) bridges where bridge preventive maintenance is to be performed. Dokken Engineering will field verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided 2020 BPMP Plan.Along with the field review and record research, Dokken Engineering will identify any other maintenance work necessary on the listed bridges to bring them to current conformance with the Caltrans inspection criteria and standards. Based on the results and recommendations from the field review and records research, maintenance activities may get added or removed. The scope of this project will be based off the provided, listed maintenance activities.Activities may be added to or removed from the scope as authorized. TASK 1.5.2 BRIDGE DECK TESTING Two bridges(BR#55CO055-Main Street at Santiago Creek Channel and BR#55C0423-17th Street at Santa Ana River Channel) have been identified in the inspection reports and BPMP Plan to core the bridge deck and test for chloride content. This investigative work will be included in the scope of this task to determine recommendations based on chloride contents found. The recommendations for work activities may be added and included in the PS&E package as performed in Task 2 of this scope. For the 1973 Main Street bridge deck,twelve(12)4-inch-diameter cores,spaced at roughly one location per 1,300 ftz will be extracted, and immediately reinstated with rapid-setting patch material to restore traffic by morning. Each core will be sectioned into two depth intervals (0—%in. and %-1%in.) and transferred to an AASHTO-accredited laboratory for ASTM C1152 acid-soluble chloride testing. A California-licensed professional engineer will analyze the chloride-versus-depth data and prepare a signed memorandum projecting remaining time to corrosion initiation and recommending appropriate preservation measures. For the 17th Street bridge, a structure flagged for more advanced distress, Optime will first complete a 100%delamination sounding and ground-penetrating-radar survey to delineate subsurface delamination and thickness variations across the 32,936 ft'deck.Twenty(20)4-inch cores(about one per 1,650 ft')will then be extracted, rapidly patched,and forwarded to the laboratory.All cores will be tested for chloride content in two discrete depth increments,and four strategically selected samples (two from a highly distressed zone and two from a sound zone)will undergo detailed petrographic examination in accordance with ASTM C856 to assess micro-cracking, aggregate quality, and air-void parameters. Findings from the nondestructive survey and laboratory analyses will be integrated into a PE-sealed report that includes a georeferenced deck-condition map and a decision matrix comparing methacrylate sealing,thin overlay, or partial-depth repair as the most cost-effective rehabilitation strategy. The Dokken Team will plan and implement traffic control measures necessary to safely perform field investigations,including coordination with appropriate agencies for lane closures, encroachment permit requirements, and preparation of traffic handling strategies consistent with MUTCD and local standards.Traffic control efforts will be tailored to minimize disruption to the traveling public while maintaining safe working conditions for field personnel. Task 1.5.2 Deliverables:Two(2)digital Bridge Deck Chloride Test Reports &POKKEN 23 - 250 8/4/2&264 E N G I N E E R I N G Request for Proposals L Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No. 25-081A TASK 1.5.3 PHOTO DOCUMENTED BRIDGE ASSESSMENT There may be additional distress or damage discovered outside of those identified in the Bridge Inspection Reports. Work activities to repair, or to prevent damage from perpetuating further in the future, may be recommended and qualify to include in the project work activities. For the eight bridges identified in the BPMP plan, Dokken will take photos to document locations where there is existing damage, or where future damage can be mitigated. Dokken will prepare comprehensive photo-documented memorandum with itemized cost estimates detailing recommended bridge preventive maintenance work for each bridge. Dokken will assist the City to submit Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) Forms 6A and 6D to request the anticipated funding to accommodate the additional work. Task 1.5.3 Deliverables:One(1)digital Bridge Assessment Memorandum TASK 1.6 SURVEY Based on the BPMP plan and bridge inspection reports, the identified work recommendations are limited to structure maintenance activities. Available parcel data indicates work is to be performed within City, Orange County Flood Control District, County, or Caltrans Right-of-Way; therefore no boundary surveys for temporary construction easements are anticipated. TASK 1.7 WATER QUALITY Based on the BPMP plan,the work activities identified are limited to structure maintenance.There are no anticipated changes to either the structure,channel,or impervious areas within the project footprint to warrant hydrology or hydraulics analysis. Dokken will assist the City to complete the internal WQMP/SWPP determination form to determine that the project does not trigger LID or WQMP requirements. Dokken will identify best management practices for implementation in project plans and specifications. TASK 1.8 PUBLIC OUTREACH Dokken will assist the City in preparing for and attending a public meeting at the outset of final design to provide a project update to the public and interested stakeholders. Notices would be prepared and sent to all stakeholders and exhibits would be developed to facilitate discussion regarding project details. TASK 1.9 UTILITY COORDINATION Based on the work being performed, utility relocations are not expected. It is anticipated that Relocation Claim Letter to Owners(Letter#2)and liability determination will not be necessary. Utility Base Mapping Dokken will prepare a letter request for as-builts and facility mapping form each of the utility companies,for the City's review and approval. Dokken will perform a field review of the project site to ascertain existing conditions compared to the as-built drawings. Using available record drawings, information from the field reconnaissance and utility mark outs, Dokken will prepare a utility base map in CAD format identifying the existing utilities. Utilities will be shown on the project plans where applicable. Utility Impact Identification and No Conflicts Letter Dokken Engineering will review the project improvements against the existing utility base mapping and identify potential utility impacts. Dokken will develop an inventory of potential utility impacts, confirm utility rights with City records, and prepare Utility Notice to Owners—No Conflict(Letter#3)for distribution to pertinent utility companies, if needed. Task 1.9 Deliverables: Utility Mapping Requests(Letter#1);Existing Utility Base Map; Utility Notice to Owners—No Conflict (Letter#3) TASK 1.10 30%PLANS SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE(PS&E) Dokken Engineering will develop schematic plans, which shall include civil design, structural design, draft technical specifications outline and "opinion of estimated cost".Work activities will include those verified on the provided BPMP Plan List, as well as any additional recommended activities from the project research as agreed upon with the City. The PS&E package assumes the eight bridges will be included in a single delivery. For the two bridges receiving deck testing (BR# 55C0055 - Main Street at Santiago Creek Channel and BR#55C0423 - 17t"Street at Santa Ana River Channel), it is assumed that results of testing leads to work recommendations of methacrylate treatment.The 30% phase will incorporate recommendations from Project Research to define work activities and project limits. The plans will be prepared based off existing records and as-builts.Any additional work that is not part of the current project scope and the City wishes to include into the project will be discussed during this stage of the project. 30%Plans and Opinion of Probable Cost FOR l 0NrK1E N 23 — 251 8/4/2126s ENG IN EERING Request for Proposals L Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No. 25-081A Obtain and review all relevant as-built plans and the most recent Caltrans bridge inspection reports to create the preliminary plans of the bridge repairs. Quantities and cost estimates will be prepared for all structures. Task 1.10 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans,One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost;One(1)digital copy of Draft Technical Specifications Outline TASK 2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS(60%,90%,and 100%PS&E) Dokken will integrate Cost Estimates, utility mapping, encroachment permits, and easements as applicable. Dokken will coordinate submittals with the City,Caltrans,and any other stakeholder Agency. Burne Engineering will support and perform a portion the bridge preventive maintenance work tasked herein. The Dokken Team will provide bridge preventive maintenance work,traffic handling, signing/striping and coordination. Plan and specification submittals shall be provided in digital format to the City. Hard copy plan sets may be provided upon request. Digital files shall be in Portable Document Format(PDF)and AutoCAD 2023 format.Technical Specifications will be prepared using the Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Special Provisions(latest versions)as a basis, modified for FHWA requirements and submitted along with plans at 60%,90%and 100%. The PS&E package assumes the eight bridges will be included in a single delivery. For the two bridges receiving deck testing (BR# 55C0055 - Main Street at Santiago Creek Channel and BR# 55C0423 - 17th Street at Santa Ana River Channel), it is assumed that results of testing leads to work recommendations of methacrylate treatment. A formal Quality Control(QC)review will be performed by Dokken and Burne Engineering at each submittal phase.The review will address construction drawings,technical specifications,cost estimates,and overall constructability of the project. Traffic,Signing and Striping Dokken will not design permanent striping, pavement markings, or signing plans. It is assumed that as-builts, or plans provided by the City,will be utilized and referenced to restripe to the existing configuration. A Caltrans Encroachment Permit will be obtained for BR#55C-0055,where signing and signing or traffic handling encroaches into Caltrans Right-of-Way. Dokken will design traffic control plans for this bridge only and assumes the contractor will be responsible for traffic control plans for the other bridges. Task 2.1 60%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) Upon approval of 30% PS&E by the City and Caltrans and upon receiving environmental clearance (both NEPA and CEQA), The Dokken team will prepare and submit the draft 60%plans,specifications,and estimate to the City. 60%Plans Upon approval of the work limits defined in the 30% project phase, work will begin on the 60% plans. The plans will incorporate any comments received from the City from the 30%submittal review and will incorporate all construction details including signing/striping and traffic handling necessary to complete BPMP work. The plans will show utilities based on research and utility mapping.A full set of plans will be prepared with consideration for constructability and public safety. Although not anticipated, if any ancillary structures design is needed, it shall be in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Eighth Edition) with California Amendments current at time of bridge design, Caltrans Bridge Design Details Manual, Caltrans Bridge Design Aids, Caltrans Bridge Memos to Designers, Structure Technical Policies, and Bridge Design Memos, Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC), Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications (latest version), and City CAD Standards.The bridge design work will be performed in English units of measure. 60%Opinion of Probable Cost The Dokken Team will provide cost estimates at the 60% PS&E design submittal. Detailed quantities will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans Standard Specifications (latest version) and payment items. The engineer's estimate of probable construction cost ("Marginal Estimate") for the project will be prepared using the most recent and relevant Caltrans Cost Data,Consultants cost data, as well as the City's cost data. 60%Contract Specifications and Special Provisions The Dokken Team will prepare the contract Technical Provisions for the project based in general on Caltrans Standard Special Provisions (latest version) as a basis and modified for FHWA requirements, Caltrans Standard Specifications(latest version), and City construction contract standards. Task 2.1 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans and Specifications;One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; Two (2)Caltrans Encroachment Permit applications;One(1)digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. Task 2.2 90%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) 1�D 0NrKE N 23 - 252 8/4/2i266 ENG IN EERING Request for Proposals L Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No. 25-081A At the 90%level,a thorough review of the plans,work limits,details and specifications is performed for clarity,capacity, City standards, and constructability issues. When the review is complete, the designers will address all comments from the internal and City reviews of the PS&E package.After plan corrections,the designer will review the corrected details to ensure all comments have been addressed. The Dokken Team will proceed with the preparation of the 90% submittal. Plan sheets included in the 60% submittal will receive additional annotation, descriptions, and notes identified per the City's review and the independent check. The submittal will include written responses to all comments received on the prior submittal. Task 2.2 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans and Specifications,One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; Two (2) Final Caltrans Encroachment Permit applications; One (1) digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. Task 2.3 100%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) At the 100% level,the QC focus will be to confirm prior review comments have been adequately addressed and review any new information added since the 90%submittal. A mark-up of the plans, special provisions and item list will be provided to the Project Manager. After review comments are received from the 90% Bridge PS&E, The Dokken Team will revise the plans and coordinate the necessary changes to the specifications and estimate.Written responses to the City and Caltrans comments will be prepared and provided with the 100%submittal. Task 2.3 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plan and specifications;one(1)digital set of 100%Bidding Documents;one(1) digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost, One(1) digital copy of Design Calculations if applicable; One (1)digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. TASK 3 BID ADVERTISEMENT,CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION,RECORD DRAWINGS Task 3.1 Bid Advertisement Bidding procedures will be the responsibility of the City. While the PS&E construction package is advertising for bids, all questions concerning the intent shall be referred to the City for resolution.In the event that any item requiring interpretation in the drawings or specifications is discovered during the bidding period,said items shall be analyzed by Dokken for decision by the City. Dokken shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification,or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Dokken shall attend pre-bid meeting, if scheduled. Task 3.2 Construction Administration Dokken shall provide support to the City during the Construction Administration phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification,and/or reviewing submittals. Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required to support the construction contract. Dokken shall complete shop drawings reviews within two(2)weeks of receipt.Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two(2)working days of receipt. Dokken shall be available as requested by the City to resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Dokken shall bring to the attention of the City any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which Dokken may observe. Dokken shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City,or to deputize another to do so. Task 3.3 Record Drawings/As-Builts Upon construction completion, the City will submit field-marked prints to Dokken. Dokken shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations,signature, and submit to the City. &POKKEN 23 — 253 8/4/21267 E N G I N E E R I N G 00 � cw 0 2 m c4 00 o R� - =s m •� e E 3 u v IS N v a\ p m N m c " g� ► v m N v Y y Z c 0• m 0 p e ° E o E z t 4 ' �„ •c _ T e y O •- K E 4 '£ m f •o 9 'o v E _19 = 9G o 0 i - a" m � E u' 6 `0 3 0 V 0 3 0 o 3 E E LO a + N if1 �l1 N N N N �O t0 �O •D N b N \ co'J \ \ N N O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Mf M N N N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N W O O O O O O O 0 0 o o 8' a �0 a a a a .00•i v `.� a3o m ry a ry n w `o L - m 0 p m o Z K1. N Y, 0Y•, o O U E ,� c c �. z — 0 o r o m o x "" x c c • N m co � _ E Q � v '� � o S ¢ v m � C7 .N c° v o o e ' 2 N m tL '� 7...a ° z —"p o m 3 �•W N m M z > Lh W u } v cu ho Z W c a fli d' m w Request for Proposals �Q Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program ` 'Ip RFP No.25-081A AGREEMENT STATEMENT Dokken Engineering does not take any exceptions to the City's Professional Services Agreement. Dokken Engineering will comply with the contract terms and conditions delineated in the RFP. FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE ABOUT DOKKEN ENGINEERING R§ DOKKEN Founded in 1986, Dokken Engineering(Dokken) is a multi-discipline, professional services firm specializing in all phases of project development and delivery, ENGINEERING including preliminary engineering, environmental documents, feasibility studies, HEADQUARTERS: PSRs, PA&EDs,PS&Es,and design support during construction. During the past 39 110 Blue Ravine Road,Suite 200 years, we have developed an exceptional depth of experience and expertise Folsom,CA 95630 having engineered and obtained environmental compliance on more than 3,000 Project Manager: infrastructure projects, including more than 2,500 federally funded projects. Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE 1450 Frazee Road,Suite 100 We employ a diverse group of over 160 civil, structural, traffic, hydraulics/ San Diego, CA 92108 hydrology, and drainage designers, as well as environmental planners, Telephone: (858)514-8377 community outreach experts, funding, and right-of-way specialists, who Mobile: (541)602-2960 together provide seamless and cost-effective project delivery.Due to our size,and Branch Offices: our in-house services, we can immediately provide a team of professionals to 1450 Frazee Road,Suite 100 meet your project's schedule needs. San Diego, CA 92108 Dokken Engineering's performance is measured by our ability to successfully 101 Pacifica,Suite 350 deliver quality infrastructure projects throughout California and serving a variety Irvine,CA 92618 of public agency clients.The majority of Dokken's clients are repeat clients! This 2192 Civic Center Drive attests to our abilities and history of providing quality services, meeting Redding,CA 96001 schedules,and remaining within budgets.Dokken has a long,distinguished history Organization Form:CA Corporation of delivering award-winning projects that have been completed throughout Year of Incorporation: 1986 California. No other firm has a greater record of professional civil engineering Total No.of Employees: 162 project success than Dokken. But don't take our word for it,call our references. Firm Capabilities&Expertise: FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY • Project Management Dokken is a growing,financially responsible firm with the majority of our business • Structures coming from repeat clients. Dokken is financially sound and has no long-term • HBP. Street Improvements debt.We promptly pay our subconsultants and vendors,evidenced by our Class 1 • Roadway/Highway Design credit ratings with Dun & Bradstreet (DUNS #1S-020-9971). For all our years in . Stormwater business, we have maintained insurance coverage that exceeds industry • Water/Sewer standards through reputable insurance companies with the highest A.M. Best • Street Lighting ratings.As a California Corporation for the past 39 years,there are no planned or • Signing/Striping anticipated changes in our business organization or operations. • Erosion Control • Drainage Dokken meets all of Caltrans' A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process • Hydrology/Hydraulics requirements and successfully navigates the process with every one of our • Traffic Control Plans Writing • projects subject to Caltrans oversight. We have our financial statements and . Grant Grant NEPA/CECW overhead rate voluntarily audited annually by an independent CPA to expedite . Environmental Permits the Caltrans audit process and to ensure that our financials and indirect cost rate . Right of Way Acquisition& comply with all Federal funding rules. Our accounting staff and independent Relocation Assistance auditors regularly attend Caltrans Audits and Investigations training sessions to www.dokkenengineering.com ensure that we are up to date with the latest requirements. FAMILIARITY WITH SERVICES Dokken has successfully completed hundreds of structure designs, from rural two-lane HBP bridges, to complex multi-level freeway-to-freeway interchanges. Additional structure designs include pedestrian overcrossings, bicycle bridges, viaducts, and retaining/sound walls. Dokken has also provided seismic stability evaluations, retrofit plans, Bridge Preventative �11D ONNE N 23 - 255 8/4/2@AW9 E N G I N E E R I N G Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program 'I �' RFP No.25-081A Maintenance Plans, specifications, and estimates. Our structures team has innovative and cost-effective design solutions which save our clients millions of dollars. Paying careful attention to the details of a project's setting, along with client and community feedback,our designs meet the unique conditions of each project. IN-HOUSE EXPERTISr With numerous technical specialties under one roof, project coordination,and communication are maximized.The following are some of our featured in-house services: Roadway Design I Roadway design is an Environmental Services I Dokken has an integral component of Dokken's services. From experienced in-house Environmental Services freeways to residential streets, our engineers Group that works on our roadway, bridge, and design both simple and complex roadway widenings, infrastructure projects throughout California. We have realignments, street "diets", and new extensions, as well established professional working relationships with as the required improvements to the surrounding areas, federal and state regulatory agencies based on technical such as bikeway and pedestrian facilities, rail trails, excellence and a thorough understanding of regulatory landscaping, hardscapes, sidewalks, utility relocations, processes, including, Environmental Document bus stop/pullouts and intersection signalization. Preparation (NEPA / CEQA Analysis and Compliance), Structures Design I Dokken has successfully Technical Studies & Reports, and Environmental completed hundreds of structure designs,from Regulatory Permitting & Compliance using a hands-on rural two-lane HBP bridges to complex multi- approach that has accelerated regulatory schedules. level freeway-to-freeway interchanges. Additional Right of Way Services I The Dokken team has structure designs include pedestrian overcrossings, Row considerable experience preparing right of bicycle bridges, viaducts, and retaining/sound walls. way engineering documents under State and Dokken has also provided seismic stability evaluations, Federal law as outlined in the Caltrans Right of Way retrofit plans, specifications, and estimates. Our Manual. Our services consist of researching public structures team has innovative and cost-effective design records,obtaining title reports, preparing appraisal maps, solutions,which save our clients millions of dollars. Paying owner exhibits, and plats and legal descriptions for the careful attention to the details of a project's setting,along conveyance of land title rights, such as easements, fee with client and community feedback, our designs meet title grant deeds, and temporary construction easements the unique conditions of each project. between parties. TRUSTI=I?SURCONSULTANTS Dokken has enlisted the following subconsultants to meet the City's DBE goal and to provide a full-service team. Burne Engineering (DBE) Employing over 350 technically strong and highly Structural Design motivated engineers,geologists,environmental scientists, and technicians. State-of-the-art geotechnical and Established in 2007, Burne Engineering Services, Inc. materials testing laboratories, extensive inventories of (Burne Engineering) is a certified DBE structural field equipment and instrumentation, comprehensive engineering firm, specializing in the design and technical libraries, and advanced data-management construction support of transportation-related structures, systems support each office. such as bridges and retaining walls, and buildings. Their licensed professional engineers have been designing Optime Consulting Group transportation-related structures for more than twenty- = Surveying/Right of Way Engineering five years, having provided construction support for more than a hundred bridges and dozens of retaining walls. Optime Consulting Group, certified SB/SBE firm, is a dynamic and innovative force in the construction industry. Geocon Consultants, Inc. They specialize in concrete materials, forensic Hazardous Materials assessment, nondestructive testing, pavement design and evaluation, and sustainability, approaching each project Geocon Consultants, Inc. is a California Corporation with technical precision and a deep sense of established in 1971 as a professional engineering responsibility. Optime Consulting Group offers a wide consulting firm providing comprehensive geotechnical range of materials-related services, including material engineering, environmental consulting, materials testing, characterization, testing, performance evaluation, failure and special inspection services for over 54 years. analysis,and material design and optimization. �11 D 0(KIl-IS L�iE N 23 — 256 8/4/2&&6o ENG IN E E R IN G Request for Proposals �Q Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A PROJECT TEAM Leading our team and coordinating our team's resources is Project Manager, Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE. Gabriel brings over 14 years of experience in providing project specific engineering solutions and managing civil engineering services for public agency infrastructure projects. His time-sensitive approach to managing projects has resulted in expedited project completion,the quick restoration of facility operations,and adherence to project budgets,schedules,and goals. Gabriel will be directly responsible for project management and the primary contact with the City. The following organizational chart visually represents the structure of our proposed team and the relationship among our Project Manager, subconsultants,and support staff. Charles Tornad, ' Gabriel Hoxnneier, • Subconsultants L PROJECT MANAGER 7 Burne Engineering(BE)-DBE ooyrnan, ' Geocon Consultants, Inc.(GEO) """""""""""""""""""""' • • C REVIEW Optime Consulting Group,Inc.(OCG) RoadwayStructure Design , Gabriela Morales,PE Lori Burne, SE(BE) Megan Cunningham, PE Jeffrey Little Russ Nygaard, PE(9E) CoordinationUtility Jena Addenbrooke, PE Vanessa Cothran,SR/WA Ashley Orsaba-Finders, PE,QSD/P Hazardous Material Concrete Testing -Indicates Key Staff Rebecca Silva(GEO) Kamran Amini, PhD, PE(OCG) Cord Denning,CAC(GEO) William Clifford(OCG) The following resumes provides qualification information for our key personnel including their technical expertise and experience directly related to the proposed work. I sPOKKIE N 23 - 257 8/4/��61 N N G I N E . H I N G ti Request for Proposals �+= �41 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE improvements, there are retaining walls to support streets, parking lots and general grading. Developed PROJECT MANAGER designs, plans and specifications for seven retaining walls EDUCATION of various types including masonry, spread footings, and 2010, BS Civil Engineering,Oregon State University CIDH foundation walls.Project is on-going through its 95% 2011, M.Eng.,Civil Engineering,Oregon State University submittal. LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS Grandview Beach Access Stairway Structural 2022,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C93700 Assessment I Encinitas,CA EXPERIENCE Bridge Design Engineer I Dokken Engineering conducted investigations, structural assessment, and repair 14 years(2 w/Dokken) estimates for the multi-level timber and concrete beach AVAILABILITY access stairway located along the Coast Highway. 40% Structural inspections consisted of field investigations to test, inventory, and photo document maintenance needs Mr. Gabriel Hoxmeier is a California for stairway elements experiencing deterioration from registered professional engineer with prolonged marine exposure. Concrete soundings and jJ 14 years of experience whose timber specimen cores were taken to assess the material primary role is as a bridge engineer conditions. Provided structural evaluation memorandums designing transportation related detailing the conditions of the main structural concrete structures. His expertise includes and timber elements,and steel connection hardware,and designing bridges,retaining walls,overhead estimated maintenance and repair costs. sign structures, and culverts, working with steel, Bryan District Bridge Program,TxDOT I Bryan District, prestressed concrete, post-tensioned concrete, and TX conventionally reinforced concrete. He has strong fundamentals with a broad design background with Work Authorization Manager � Oversaw design team, concrete and steel superstructures, substructures, load project budget, schedule, contract development, and ratings, seismic designs, and inspections. Mr. Hoxmeier's contract supplemental agreements. Program covers project experience includes preliminary concept designs, development of PS&E packages for 35 bridges design-bid-builds, design-build projects, and load ratings replacements in the Bryan District over 5 years with a total and assessments of existing structures. contract fee of$14M. The program is uniquely designed to alleviate TxDOT's resources as 30%, 60% and 90% Alvarado Canyon Road Realignment I San Diego,CA submittals are performed by an internal independent Bridge Design Engineer I Dokken is providing preliminary review team instead of TxDOT. Bridges are a mix of OFF engineering and PS&E design for the Alvarado Canyon and ON system bridges with construction fundings ranging Road Realignment & Culvert Replacement Project. The from$400,000 to$9,000,000. Bridges include slab beams, primary purpose of the project is to alleviate current and box beams, and Tx girders. Held Design Concept projected future traffic congestion on Fairmount Avenue, Conferences with the client and representatives about the Mission Gorge Road, Alvarado Canyon Road, and the preliminary project concept. Coordinated with sub- westbound 1-8 off-ramp at Fairmount Ave, and address consultants for survey, utilities, and geotechnical localized flooding issues within the portions of Grantville investigations. Lead design team through development of located north of Alvarado Creek. Developed APS for the PS&E packages. Alvarado Canyon Bridge, as well as a widening of an Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement I Santa Monica, existing box culvert investigating constructability, CA construction costs, and staged construction. Bridge Design Engineers This project will replace the East Campus Loop Road, UCSD I San Diego,CA existing 446-foot Pier Bridge that connects to the timber Lead Structures Engineer I UC San Diego is proposing pier. Gabriel is responsible for design and coordination for improvements to its East Campus. One major point of the existing bridge demolition plans, steel staircase and focus for the renovation of East Campus includes pier railing, and temporary vehicle ramps to maintain reconfiguring existing roadways and incorporating new access to the pier. The project team completed the 65% landscape space to free up additional infill building sites design in April 2024 and the project is on schedule to bid in and enhance circulation for all users. Among the project 2025. �POKKE N 23 - 258 8/4/2&'&62 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Charles Tornad, PE 2018-2019 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Carlsbad,CA PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Project Manager I Responsible for advancing the PS&E for EDUCATION bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two 1999, BS Mechanical Engineering, Cal Poly San Luis structures. Jefferson Street Bridge involved providing a Obispo methacrylate overlay to seal existing deck cracks, LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS replacement and repairs to existing bridge railings and 2023,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C66058 metal beam guard railing approach systems, as well as sidewalk remediation to meet ADA standards. El Camino EXPERIENCE Real Bridge at San Marcos Creek involved methacrylate 25 years(All w/Dokken) overlay in multiple stages with traffic handling plans reviewed and approved by Caltrans to receive the AVAILABILITY Encroachment Permit to perform the work. Pressure 30% grouting of deteriorated slopes below sidewalk curb ramps was performed to mitigate future costly repairs. Mr. Charles Tornaci is Dokken's San Diego structures team leader, both Maria Ygnacia Creek Bridge I San Barbara County,CA - + overseeing and performing the Project Manager I Responsible for the seismic retrofit of structural analysis and design efforts an existing 3-span 132-foot-long composite steel girder for bridge projects in Southern bridge on San Marcos Road over Maria Ygnacia Creek. California. With over 25 years of Retrofit consisted of replacing existing steel pier column experience on structural transportation cross bracing, adding additional base plates and anchor projects spanning over Caltrans, Railroad, and Army Corp bolts at existing pier columns, and cast-in-drilled-hole facilities, he is very familiar with Caltrans Local Assistance piling behind the abutments to restrain longitudinal and Division of Structures standards and practices, seismic movements. Design challenges included detailing specializing in innovative and cost-effective design around and accommodating several existing underground solutions. He has been involved in a wide range of and overhead utilities within the construction limits. projects involving planning, design, construction, seismic retrofits of vehicular and pedestrian bridges, retaining City of Palm Desert Bridge Preventive Maintenance walls, bike trails,and bridge preventive maintenance. Palm Desert,CA 2016-2017 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Project Manager I Responsible for preparing the City's Carlsbad,CA Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program and Prioritization List, including a report documenting the Project Manager I Responsible for the site investigations City's bridge inventory and maintenance needs, scoring and documentation memorandum detailing structural criteria, construction cost estimates, and condition photo defects in the existing structures and recommendations documentation of bridges within the City. Worked for preventative maintenance to extend the serviceable directly with City staff to organize a multi-year phasing life for 10 local agency bridges within the City of Carlsbad. strategy for the maintenance work to meet the Worked directly with City staff to update maintenance prioritization in conjunction with City fiscal year budget priority and led the project team to advance the PS&E for allocations,and led the project team to complete PS&E for bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two bridge preventive maintenance of five structures. Repair structures.Calle Barcelona POC details involved repairs to details involved joint seal replacements and expansion spalled rock fagades,crack sealing,and righting of a tilting dams, corrugated steel arch culvert repair and monument wall. Poinsettia Lane OH work involved replacement splicing, and concrete spall repairs on replacing bridge railing and repairing approach railing existing superstructures and substructures. damaged by exposure to marine environment, adding expansion joints, and concrete crack repair. Details and Additional Relevant Experience: materials specified to address coastal environment • Grandview and Swami's Beach Stairway Structural conditions. Railroad specific project specifications were Assessment, Encinitas, CA included with the contract documents to detail required • Sycamore Avenue Beach Access Stairways right of entry agreements and trainings required to Emergency Repair,Carlsbad,CA perform maintenance work over and adjacent to UPRR • Emergency Slope Repair, Del Mar,CA facilities. �111)@(KK1E N 23 - 259 8/4/2&&63 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Steve Kooyman, PE Project Manager I Steve assisted the City with managing this high priority park project for Brea from preliminary QA/QC REVIEW engineering into bid and award, with assistance into EDUCATION construction. The project design included new accessible 1991, BS Civil Engineering,CSU Chico playground equipment and surfacing, mass grading, retaining and sound walls, PCC walkways and curbs, new LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS restroom,new drainage treatment facilities,new ball fields 1996,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C55757 and amenities, amphitheater,all new utilities,ADA ramps, QSD/QSP Training new lighting, EV charging stations, and miscellaneous park Pavement Inspector Certification improvements within the Phase 1,5-acre area. EXPERIENCE Traffic Signal Modification Improvements I Brea,CA 32 years(<1 w/Dokken) Project Manager I Steve managed this signal modification AVAILABILITY project which replaced several signals at three 40% intersections in Brea. Brea Boulevard Street Improvements I Brea,CA Mr. Steve Kooyman is a Registered Civil Project Manager I Steve managed this pavement Engineer with 32 years of experience, t primarily serving jurisdictions in rehabilitation project which included milling 2" deep Northern and Southern California. His 30,000 sf of pavement, placement of 250,000 SF Type II roles have included Project Manager, Slurry, removing and replacement of 12 ADA ramps, and Construction Manager, Supervising Civil other AC and PCC street improvements along Brea Blvd Design Engineer, and Quality Control from Imperial Highway to Fir Street in Brea. Engineer. He has helped numerous cities deliver public South Brea Water,Sewer and Street Improvements I works Capital Improvement Program projects across Brea,CA various phases, including planning, environmental, right of way, design, bid, and construction. His expertise spans Project Manager I Steve managed this extensive water, sewer, storm drain, streets, PCC ADA, sidewalk, rehabilitation project which replaced 14,850 LF 8" C-900 facilities, parks, bike trails, erosion control, and stream water mains and appurtenances, 300 1"-2" copper water restoration projects.Steve also has extensive experience in services,32 FH's,1,794 LF of 6-8"VCP sewer mains,28 ADA development projects and Caltrans/City Cooperative ramps and misc.curb and gutter work,2,800 SF of AC R&R, Agreement coordination. His deep knowledge of 174,00 SF AC grinding, 1,850 TN's ARHM overlay, and engineering policies, codes, and standards makes him a 384,000 SF Type II slurry with, traffic control, and erosion valuable measures within various streets in the South Brea resource for engineers, architects, contractors, and public agencies. subdivision area. Trabuco Road and Lake Forest Boulevard Pavement SR 57&Lambert Road Interchange Improvements I Rehabilitation I Lake Forest,CA Brea,CA Project Manager I Steve managed the construction Project Manager I Project Manager for this $98 M management and inspection team through construction in Interchange Improvement project in coordination with City coordination with the City for this combined three CIP of Brea and Caltrans District 12 via cooperative agreement. project contract with All American Asphalt, contractor for He managed the extensive public and stakeholder outreach, Agency coordination, right-of-way acquisition, the City. CEQA/NEPA development and processing, mitigation Bear Street Pavement Rehabilitation I Costa Mesa,CA measures, schedule, budget with various State/Fed grant Project Manager I Steve completed the pavement design and local funding, PAED, PS&E, and Construction. The and managed the project in coordination with the City up project took over 10 years to complete from preliminary through bid & award and pre-construction for this % mile engineering,right-of-way,environmental/permits,PS&E to AC grind and cap project,inclusive of ADA ramps and misc. final construction with landscape phase into the two-year PCC sidewalk and curb and gutter replacement. plant establishment stage. Arovista Park Modernization Project I Brea,CA Additional Relevant Experience: • Costa Mesa Storm Water Master Plan,Costa Mesa,CA • Briarwood Sewer List Station, Brea,CA City Council 23 — 260 8/4/2026 R§DOKKEN PAGE14 ENGINEERING Y^tip` Request for Proposals 4� ) Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Gabriela Morales, PE Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement I Santa Monica, CA STRUCTURES PROJECT ENGINEER Structures Design Engineer I This project will replace the EDUCATION existing Pier Bridge with a 7 span, 446-foot long, and 39- 2021, MS Civil Engineering, UC Davis foot-wide bridge. In addition to the bridge replacement, 2017, BS Structural Engineering, UC San Diego the project contains 11 additional structure tasks. LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS Gabriela is responsible for the bridge design, project 2022, California Professional Civil Engineer,#C93473 coordination,and QA/QC of all structure deliverables.The project team completed the 65%design in April 2024 and EXPERIENCE the project is on schedule to bid in 2025. 8 years(All w/Dokken) Fern Road East at Glendenning Creek Bridge AVAILABILITY Replacement I Shasta County,CA 50% Structures Project Engineer I This project will replace the existing timber bridge with a single-span, 95-foot long, Ms. Gabriela Morales is a California and 28-foot-wide bridge. Gabriela is responsible for the t __ registered Engineer with 8 years of bridge design of the cast-in-place post-tensioned bridge, } - experience in designing and analyzing g project coordination, and delivery of the PS&E for all bridges and other transportation- project milestones. The project team completed the 35% f related structures. She serves as an design in March 2024. associate engineer for Dokken's bridge and structure design team. She has Eastside Road and Sharon Ave. HBP Bridges I Redding, designed structures ranging from multi-span precast and CA cast-in-place bridges to multi-level anchored soldier pile Structures Design Engineer I The Eastside Road Bridge walls. crosses Olney Creek and Sharon Avenue Bridge crosses National Trails Highway 10 HBP Bridges I San the ACID irrigation canal. Sharon Avenue was replaced Bernardino County,CA with a single-span, 55-foot long, and 28-foot and 11-inch wide, cast-in-place/post-tensioned slab bridge. Eastside Structures Project Engineer I National Trails Road will be replaced with a three-span,86-foot long,and Highway/Route 66 is a historic route that was developed 52-foot wide, cast-in-place/post-tensioned slab bridge. through the Mojave Desert region of San Bernardino Gabriela was responsible for the design calculations, County.These bridges allow stormwater to flow under the development of the plans and cost estimate,and ongoing highway but are all at the end of their useful life. The construction support, including RFI responses and replacement bridges will be reinforced concrete slabs, submittal review. varying from 43-foot single-span to 90-foot three-span bridges. Gabriela is responsible for overseeing the design over Jack Peters Creek Bridge Widening Mendocino team,coordinating with the subconsultants, and ensuring Men County,CA on-time delivery of the PS&E for all project milestones. Structures Design Engineer I This project is part of Tulare County Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program Dokken's structures on-call contract in Caltrans District 1. (Group 5) 1 Tulare County,CA The project will widen the existing three-span 223-foot long continuous bridge over Jack Peters Creek.The bridge Structures Project Engineer I This project intends to will feature two 12-foot lanes and a 6-foot separated extend the service life of 24 bridges within Tulare County pedestrian walkway. Gabriela successfully wrote the by implementing preventive maintenance measures project's Type Selection Report.The report was approved primarily consisting of scour protection repairs and other by Caltrans and Gabriela completed the design phase of work including deck treatment, spall repair, structural the project, including all coordination with Caltrans connection repairs, join repairs, bridge bearing repairs, functional units.The project has bid in August 2023 and is and asphalt concrete removal. Gabriela is responsible for currently under construction. overseeing the design team, coordinating with the subconsultants,and ensuring on-time delivery of the PS&E Additional Relevant Experience for all project milestones. • Capital Southeast Connector:White Rock Road, El Dorado&Sacramento Counties,CA �111)@(KK1E N 23 - 261 8/4/ 65 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Megan Cunningham, PE rehabilitated approximately 10 miles of distressed pavement along eastbound Interstate 8. Stage ROADWAY DESIGN construction plans were developed by Caltrans, but the EDUCATION contractor presented a proposal to revise the stage 2016, BS Civil Engineering,Gonzaga University construction concept. Dokken worked with Caltrans to design and implement updated stage construction plans LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS that met Caltrans standards, but improved construction 2023,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C94909 efficiencies, reduced impact to the traveling public, and shortened the overall construction duration. EXPERIENCE 9 years(All w/Dokken) 1-805 South Asset Management Project—Bike Path San Diego,CA AVAILABILITY 40% Design Engineer I Responsible for preliminary design and Project Report support for a multi-use facility proposed as Ms. Megan Cunningham is an Associate part of the Asset Management project. Currently, bicycle 3 Engineer with experience in roadway access is permitted on the northbound and southbound design, stage construction and traffic shoulder of 1-805 between Palm Avenue and Main Street. handling design, curb ramp design, The project proposes to add a separated multi-use facility culvert design, bike path design, and to provide a more inviting and comfortable path. Dokken J: grant-writing. Ms. Cunningham is led the preliminary design and supported Caltrans in the proficient in both MicroStation V8i and creating the Project Report. AutoCAD Civil 3D design software. Coastal Rail Trail from Oceanside Boulevard to Morse Palm Avenue/1-805 Interchange I San Diego,CA Street I Oceanside,CA Design Engineer I Responsible for designing stage Design Engineer) Responsible for developing the final construction and traffic handling plans and assisting with Project Study Report and preparing the Active preparing roadway PS&E for Palm Avenue Interchange. Transportation Program (ATP) Grant Application. Dokken Dokken is providing PS&E design for the modifications to Engineering worked with the City of Oceanside to develop, improve traffic operations and alleviate future traffic analyze and present alternatives for the Coastal Rail Trail congestion at the 1-805/Palm Avenue interchange.Dokken connecting Morse Street and Oceanside Boulevard. The Engineering also served as Lead Author and Design Coastal Rail Trail is a planned continuous bicycle route that, Engineer for the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's Fiscal Year once complete,will provide a dedicated bike facility for 44 2022 Bridge Investment Program(BIP)Grant. Dokken,the miles between the City of Oceanside and Downtown San City of San Diego,and Caltrans District 11 worked together Diego. The project is needed to improve bicycle and and was 1 of only 9 projects to receive this grant funding pedestrian mobility through the corridor. as well as the only project in the state of California! As a Green Infrastructure Group 1014 1 San Diego,CA result,the City of San Diego received $24 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Design Engineer I Responsible for curb ramp and cross Administration (FHWA). gutter design, and preparing roadway PS&E. The project added cross gutters and curb ramps at the intersections of Green Tree Boulevard Extension Project I Victorville,CA Chamoune Avenue/Polk Avenue and 46th Street/Polk Design Engineer Responsible for stage Avenue.The project also includes environmental technical construction/traffic handling plans, water line design, studies for the project and providing Green Infrastructure assisting with preparing roadway PS&E, and providing to an underserviced area of the City, as part of the Green design support during construction for Green Tree Infrastructure Group 1014. Project improvements consist Boulevard project. Project improvements include of construction of storm drain inlets and pipes,storm drain constructing a new east-west arterial connecting Yates cleanouts, new curb ramps, curbs and gutters, cross Road/Yucca Loma Road to Hesperia Road including a new gutters, roadway reconstruction, striping and pavement overhead structure across the BNSF railroad. markings. In addition, the green infrastructure will also incorporate inlet biofiltration devices, Oldcastle 1-8 Stage Construction I San Diego County,CA StormCapture modules (or approved equivalent), and Design Engineer I Responsible for design support of stage Modular Wetland System Best Management Practices (or construction plans during construction. The Project approved equivalent). �11 ONNE N 23 - 262 8/4/2&&66 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Jeffrey Little preparing regulatory permits including a CCC CDP for the new bridge. ENVIRONMENTAL Baker Boulevard Bridge over Mojave River Channel EDUCATION Replacement I San Bernardino,CA 1990,AA Business,Sacramento City College Senior Environmental Planner I San Bernardino intends EXPERIENCE to replace the wood trestle bridge in the community of 30 years(<1 w/Dokken) Baker. Funding for a new bridge was secured and the environmental process commenced. Jeff prepared the AVAILABILITY Visual Impact Assessment and Water Quality Assessment 40% Report for the project. Mr. Jeffery Little (Jeff) is a Senior Kings County Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Environmental Planner with 30 years Kings County,CA of experience on transportation Senior Environmental Planner I Kings County intends projects in Caltrans Districts 1, 2, 3,4, repair 15 bridges in their Project List No.2 group. The 4 5,and 10 for Caltrans Local Assistance project entails environmental compliance, PS&E, and - oversight and Capital projects. He ROW.Jeff is managing the environmental process for the manages multi-disciplinary teams to 15 bridges. satisfy complex regulatory requirements and complete CEQA/NEPA processes. He prepares preliminary Big Chico Creek Storm Damage Repair—Two Sites environmental studies, oversees technical documents, Chico,CA conducts endangered species consultations, writes Senior Environmental Planner I The City of Chico intends environmental documents, and prepares permit to repair two storm damaged bridges on Big Chico Creek. applications.Jeff works with public agency staff to identify The work is partially funded through FEMA. Formal design and construction solutions that minimize or avoid Section 7 consultations are needed with USFWS and impacts whenever possible. NOAA Fisheries. Jeff is preparing regulatory permits for Stevenson Road Bridge Rehabilitation I Solano County, the repair work. CA Laguna Creek Trail Overcrossing New Bridge I Elk Grove, Environmental Lead I Solano County selected Dokken CA Engineering to assist with permitting and construction Senior Environmental Planner I The City of Elk Grove monitoring for the rehabilitation of the historic bridge intends to close a gap in the Laguna Creek Trail system by over Putah Creek on Stevenson Bridge Road.The bridge is constructing a new bridge over Highway 99 and a trail locally known as "Graffiti Bridge." Jeff is supporting the extension. Funding for a new bridge was secured and the County with obtaining a Central Valley Flood Protection environmental process commenced. Jeff prepared the Board Encroachment Permit with a Corps' Section 408 Community Impact Assessment for the project. approval. Other resource agency permits include a Corps' Nationwide Permit, Regional Board Water Quality Additional Relevant Experience Certification, and a CDFW Streambed Alteration • City of Roseville 16 Bridge BPMP, Placer County,CA Agreement. He managed the preparation of a • Trinity County HSIP Cycle 8 Guardrails,Trinity County, Supplemental Biological Assessment for NEPA CA revalidation. Construction support services include the . Mariposa County 25 Bridge BPMP, Mariposa County, transplantation of elderberry shrubs, preconstruction CA surveys, and implementation of permit requirements. • Placer County HSIP Cycle 7 19 Intersections, Placer Construction is scheduled for 2026. County,CA Coastal Rail Trail from Oceanside Boulevard to Morse • City of Stockton 6 Bridge BPMP, San Joaquin County, Street I Oceanside,CA CA Senior Environmental Planner I The City of Oceanside intends to close a gap in the Coastal Rail Trail by constructing a bridge over Loma Alta Creek adjacent to Buccaneer Park. Funding for a new bridge was secured and the environmental process commenced. Jeff is �PONWE N 23 - 263 8/4/2&&67 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Lori Burne, PE, SE approximately 50 feet tall (maximum exposed height). Provided Quality Control Plan and QC of PS&E.All project STRUCTURE DESIGN Deliverables were reviewed for completeness, EDUCATION coordination with other disciplines, and incorporation of 1999, Master of Science, UC Davis written comments made during internal and external 1993, BS Civil Engineering, UC Davis technical and constructability reviews. LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS Santa Monica Pier Widening and Modification I Santa 1998, California Professional Civil Engineer,#C58412 Monica,CA 2013,California Professional Structural Engineer,#S6053 Project Manager I Responsible for the design of an EXPERIENCE addition and modifications to the existing timber pier to 25 years accommodate the new Colorado Avenue Bridge width. The existing pier was required to be strengthened in areas AVAILABILITY to support vehicle live loads. A new steel railing was also 20/ added to the timber pier. Sacramento Viaducts Deck Rehabilitation Design-Build ■„? Ms. Lori Burne, a licensed Structural "Fix50" I Sacramento,CA y Engineer, has over 25 years of experience in the structural design, Design Quality Validation Manager I Ms. Burne served as rehabilitation, retrofit, inspection, Design Quality Validation Manager for this award- and construction of highway bridges winning, major interchange design-build project for Caltrans District 3. The project included multi-polymer and buildings. She is familiar with p � Caltrans' current design standards and and polyester concrete overlays on portions of the US-50 detailing formats as well as Caltrans' procedures for local and 1-5 mainline, ramps and connectors as well as joint assistance projects. She has field construction experience replacement and deck drainage system improvements. in both highway bridges and building structures having 1-10/605 Interchange Improvements Design-Build I provided construction support and inspection services. Baldwin Park,CA Transportation work includes the structural design and independent check of bridge, culvert, and retaining wall Design Quality Assurance Manager I Ms. Burne served as structures, seismic analysis, project specifications, Design Quality Assurance Manager for this major condition assessment of existing bridges and buildings, interchange design-build project for Caltrans District 7. construction inspection, advance planning studies, and The project will replace the existing at-grade southbound software development for bridge and culvert structures. connector with a one-lane flyover direct connector, As Principal-in-Charge, Lori Burne provides company-wide realign portions of the interchange connectors, and structural engineering design oversight and guidance of modify portions of Dalewood Street in the City of Baldwin the engineering professionals in Burne Engineering. Lori Park. performs a QA/QC review of all major submittals for Burne Amador Creek Bridge/Historic Building I Amador City, Engineering projects. CA Bridge Preventative Maintenance Repairs I Calaveras Project Engineer I Provided the structural design of the County,CA relocation and strengthening of the existing Historic Project Manager I Burne Engineering was responsible for Firehouse Building. Conducted field reviews, condition the structure portion of the PS&E for the maintenance assessment, and provided construction support and repairs of nine county-maintained bridge structures. The inspection services. This project was funded by HBP. scope of the work included polyester concrete overlays, Curry Creek Bridge Sutter County,CA joint seal replacements, bearing replacements, clean/paint structural steel, remove/replace unsound Project Engineer Served as Project Engineer for the concrete,and clean/paint bridge railings. delivery of the PS&E package covering the design and construction of a two-span reinforced concrete slab Bluff Creek Retaining Wall I Humbolt County,CA bridge and 1000 feet of roadway on Pleasant Grove Road CA/QC Manager I Responsible for Quality Control for this over Curry Creek as part of the replacement of the existing retaining wall project for Caltrans District 59, Soldier Pile bridge. Also provided construction support and Ground Anchor wall approximately 173 feet long and inspection services for the County during construction. This project was funded by HBP. gDONNE N 23 - 264 8/4/29268 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Rebecca Silva Downtown San Luis Obispo,California.The existing single- span reinforced concrete T-beam 15 girder structure was HAZARDOUS MATERIALS determined to be structurally deficient and would be EDUCATION replaced with a single-span, post-tensioned slab bridge 1992, BS Soil and Water Science, UC Davis supported on two end abutments. Along with the Marsh Street Bridge, our ISA also included the Marsh Street LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS roadway,a bank parking lot,a park,and a few commercial OSHA:40-Hour HAZWOPER buildings. Existing utilities (water, sewer, electric, gas, OSHA:8-Hour Refresher Training etc.) are carried by, passing under, or alongside the OSHA:8-Hour Supervisor Training existing bridge. The ISA was performed to evaluate the EXPERIENCE potential presence of contamination and hazardous waste 33 years facilities within and adjacent to Marsh Street Bridge that may impact the construction of the proposed bridge AVAILABILITY replacement. Ms. Silva performed report review and 40% general consultation. Santa Fe Avenue Bridge over Tuolumne River Bridge Ms. Rebecca Silva has over 33 years of Replacement I Stanislaus County,CA experience with Geocon performing �•,;. `�" t� project coordination and Senior Scientist/Project Manager I Ms. Silva served as I management of soil and groundwater senior scientist/project manager for an ISA for the investigations. Ms. Silva prepares proposed replacement of the existing Santa Fe Avenue project documents from proposals and Bridge over the Tuolumne River,east of State Route 99 and work plans to reports,documenting findings the City of Modesto. The bridge was determined to be and presenting conclusions and recommendations. Ms. seismically deficient as well as functionally obsolete due to Silva efficiently manages quarterly groundwater its non-standard width and non-crash-rated railing. The monitoring at numerous sites. Throughout Ms. Silva's County proposed to either seismically retrofit and widen career, she has developed strong working relationships the bridge or replace it.The ISA was performed to evaluate with clients and regulators to provide cost-effective the potential presence of contamination and hazardous services. waste facilities within and adjacent to the project site that may impact right-of-way and temporary construction Twin Cities Road Bridge over Snodgrass Slough easement acquisition and construction of the proposed Sacramento County,CA roadway and bridge improvements. A preliminary site Senior Scientist/Project Manager I Geocon performed investigation was recommended prior to final design and environmental soil sampling services for the proposed construction. The County later decided to replace the bridge replacement/modification of the Twin Cities Road bridge. Ms. Silva conducted laboratory assignments and Bridge at Snodgrass Slough located in southern report preparation. Sacramento County. The County of Sacramento is Caltrans Bridges and Structures,Asbestos, Lead,PCB, proposing to replace or modify the existing bridge along and Sandblast Surveys I North&Central Regions,CA Twin Cities Road.The purpose of this sampling activity was to evaluate whether impacts due to heavy metals Senior Scientist I Ms. Silva provides technical and field (including aerially deposited lead [ADL] from motor service management for various structure surveys vehicle exhaust)and petroleum hydrocarbons, pesticides, throughout Northern California. Geocon has completed and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) associated with a hundreds of asbestos and lead-containing paint (LCP) former railroad alignment exist in the surface and near surveys for Caltrans. Existing Caltrans structures surveyed surface soils within the bridge approach areas. Ms. Silva include bridges, maintenance stations, salt and sand was the senior scientist/project manager and conducted storage facilities, rest stops, weigh stations, retaining report preparation and laboratory assignments. walls and pump houses, and commercial and residential properties planned for right-of-way acquisition. The Marsh Street Bridge over San Luis Obispo Creek Bridge residential and commercial properties have included Rehabilitation/Replacement I San Luis Obispo,CA single- and multi-family developments, and auto repair, Senior Scientist I Ms. Silva served as senior scientist for office, and hotel facilities. Related efforts included soil an Initial Site Assessment(ISA)for the replacement of the evaluations for deteriorated LCP and sandblast residue Marsh Street Bridge over San Luis Obispo Creek in beneath and near bridges. �11D@(KK1E N 23 - 265 8/4/2&&69 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals 4� ) Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Kamran Amin!, PhD, PE development and optimization; and thermal control plan development using two-dimensional finite difference CONCRETE TESTING method, service life analysis, Nondestructive testing EDUCATION (NDT), and pavement engineering. Notable projects may 2018, PhD Civil Engineering, Iowa State University include NDT evaluation of bridge soffit at Barstow 1st Ave 2015, MS Civil Engineering,Cleveland State University Bridge built by the San Bernardino County Transportation Ongoing, MBA, University of Illinois Authority(SBCTA),in cooperation with the City of Barstow and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad, and LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS service life analysis of drilled Pier- Plug Concrete for San 2023,California Professional Civil Engineer,#C95725 Diego Gas&Electric(SDG&E). PCI Quality control Personnel—Level 1 Quality Assurance and Source Inspection Services EXPERIENCE (Contract 59A1336),Caltrans I Northern California,CA 15 years Subject Matter Expert/Staff Engineer/Materials AVAILABILITY Engineer I Dr. Amini brings extensive materials 100% engineering and technical expertise to the evaluation of material specifications, providing insights and guidance in Dr. Kamran Amini is a seasoned addressing project-specific challenges. He actively construction materials and structural mentors junior staff and METS(Materials Engineering and engineer with more than 15 years of Testing Services) representatives, assisting them in experience. He is an expert in design, identifying solutions to complex issues as they arise. production, and evaluation of special Professional and Technical Specialist Engineering concretes and utilization of several non- Services(Contract 59A1338),Caltrans I Statewide,CA destructive test methods. He is vastly experienced in engineering design from the initial Subject Matter Expert/Staff Engineer/Materials conceptual stage,through feasibility study and to detailed Engineer I Dr.Amini provides materials engineering and design. He is knowledgeable of standards and test technical expertise for the evaluation of material methods related to construction materials, non- specifications,the investigation of innovative materials destructive testing,and condition assessment.In addition, and test method standards,and the development and Dr. Amini is knowledgeable of the following standards: delivery of materials related training. He works with ASTM, AASHTO, RILEM, FIB 34. He is also knowledgeable various groups within METS and advises and proposes of MATLAB,JMP,and Design Expert(Statistical Design and criteria for the adoption of national test method Analysis of Data). standards and generates draft specifications and material Various Projects I Los Angeles,CA recommendation reports. Dr.Amini provides technical support for the effective implementation of sustainability Principal & Senior Consultant I Dr. Amini performs and performance-based specification in advance of project document and specification review; material Pavement and Materials Partnering Committee(PMPC) development and optimization; concrete mixture design efforts. �I�@(KKiE N 23 - 266 8/4/2&'&'60 E N G IN E E R ING ti Request for Proposals �+= �41 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A PROPOSED WORK PLAN PROJECT APPROACF The City of Santa Ana (City) is seeking Professional Engineering Design Services for eight(8) bridges throughout the City.The Caltrans Local Assistance Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) established under the Highway Bridge Program (HBP)serves to extend the life of local agency bridges and delay the need for full rehabilitation or replacement by performing certain qualifying preventative maintenance work. The City has selected eight bridges to develop Plans,Specifications& Estimate (PS&E) based on recommendations provided through regular Caltrans Bridge Inspections (BIRIS). The City has provided a 2020 BPMP Work Plan to include anticipated bridge work. The work identified is limited to the bridge deck surface including work such as application of methacrylate, cleaning and replacing expansion joints,chaining of the deck and coring and testing the deck for chloride content. The most current inspection reports indicate additional work recommendations that aren't reflected in the 2020 BPMP Work Plan.To conform to current standards and inspection criteria,these recommendations will be included in the proposed work activities. These additional work recommendations include repairing substructure concrete spalls, painting of steel components and repaving approaches. Dokken Engineering will perform site assessments along with researching project as- builts and inspection reports to verify the listed work activities The project is federally funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through the Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and administered by Caltrans Local Assistance. Funding authorization has been obtained for Preliminary Engineering (PE) do phase. As such, the project must meet the guidelines and - requirements of the HBP. 4f We will review and verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided 2020 BPMP Work Plan and most /F w recent inspection Reports. We will perform a field review and identify all other maintenance work to conform with Caltrans / inspection criteria.Any additional work identified will be categorized whether it qualifies or not to be included in the BPMP. If the City wishes to pursue adding these additional recommendations to the scope,we have extensive and recent experience supporting agencies in submitting the Local Assistance Program Guidelines(LAPG)Forms 6A and 6D to request the anticipated funding to accommodate the additional work. It is anticipated that these forms will need to be submitted regardless, due to the escalated design and construction costs exceeding the currently programed values. The Dokken Team has reviewed the documents provided in the RFP, requested scope of work,and bridge inspection reports gain a full understanding of the project and identify key constraints of the design. The following table summarizes the key project issues and describes the benefit the Dokken Team will bring to the City, which is further discussed on the following pages. EnTuff, M Structures Most recent BIRIS provides The Dokken team proposes to perform a The Dokken team has extensive recommendations not photo documented assessment of each of the experience with Bridge Preventive currently scoped into City's City's identified bridge sites during the Maintenance work and is prepared to BPMP that are eligible for Preliminary Design task to evaluate existing incorporate any additional work items Federal reimbursement conditions and inform the City on whether that may be warranted. Dokken the additional and previous recommendations Engineering is well versed in getting such as methacrylate overlays and concrete additional scope of work items bridge deck coring are warranted. Additional programmed for Federal funding,and HBP eligible work items can be programmed has experience preparing LAPG forms 6A through Local Assistance Program Guidelines and 6D for our local agency clients to (LAPG)forms 6A(scope definition)and 6D submit to Caltrans Local Assistance. (scope/cost/schedule change)to receive Federal Reimbursement. �I'D ONKIE N 23 - 267 8/4/2r261 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Traffic control during special Dokken Engineering will coordinate The Dokken team has experience site investigations permitting and have traffic control for bridge engaging stakeholders regarding deck evaluation and testing. The Dokken temporary traffic impacts as well as team will keep traffic disturbances to a preparing appropriate encroachment and minimum and coordinate frequently with all regulatory permit applications and traffic stakeholders to maintain schedule. handling procedures during the design phase to facilitate safe site investigations. State and Federal Procedures Knowledge of the Federal Following State and Federal guidelines is key Dokken Engineering works exclusively on Aid process. to receive funding through the available transportation projects that require State and Federal programs.The compliance with State and Federal development of PS&E must follow standard regulations. We have a proven track Caltrans, HBP and FHWA requirements, record of project delivery over 3000 which include obtaining E-76 approvals,and projects and are familiar with every step compliance with NEPA and full compliance of the Federal process and the approval with Chapter 11 of the Local Assistance requirements. Program Guidelines. Utility Mapping and Coordination Construction can be delayed Utility base mapping and coordination While utility conflicts are not anticipated due to lack of utility efforts will be prioritized from the beginning for the programmed BPMP work, coordination and conflict of project design by following a utility providing utility base maps and clear identification. coordination process(Letter#1 and#3). communication to utility companies will Located utilities will be identified on the ensure appropriate measures are taken project plans and noted in the project to protect their facilities in place without specifications to ensure the construction causing delays to construction. contractor is aware of existing facilities and clearances. Stage Construction Construction will require When possible,construction activities Providing continued access during staged traffic lane closures covering the entire bridge deck(such as construction will benefit motorists since impacting public travel. methacrylate overlays)will be staged to no detours will be required. Maintaining Closure impacts will vary by always maintain two-way vehicular and access to driveways for businesses bridge depending on bicycle/pedestrian traffic along the bridges. reduces economic impacts related to anticipated construction If needed, Dokken will work with the City to traffic delays. Dokken has extensive activities,different number identify closures and/or flagging on a bridge- experience evaluating different closure of lanes,volume,and by-bridge basis to best accommodate alternatives to minimize impacts. proximities to intersections. motorists during. Traffic handling plans will Considerations will be taken for road accommodate driveway and intersection classifications, medians,construction access for nearby residential and business staging,adjoining intersections and properties to maintain access. traffic signals. Environmental Compliance with NEPA and Identify work limits and environmental Dokken has long history of working CEQA required to utilize impacts early.Organized tracking of both closely with cities and design teams for federal funding. project wide and bridge specific permits. early identification of environmental impacts and obtaining environmental clearances without project delays. STRUCTURES The successful approach to this project will be to provide plans that define the overall work and at the same time, highlight the unique details of each site clearly. The plans will also allow the contractor to streamline their means and methods of construction.We anticipate providing individual General Plan sheets defining all work to be performed,coupled with focused details where applicable, particularly for joint seal replacements, spall repair work and work on bridge railings and substructural components. We will clearly identify all information regarding the above-grade, at-grade and below-grade modifications,all exposed and underground utilities, manholes,gate valve boxes and survey monuments. �11DONKE N 23 - 268 8/4/2r262 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals 4� Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A We are very familiar with appropriate joint seal cleaning procedures and repair materials. In addition, art , we have developed relationships with industry representatives that will assist with unusual conditions such as coring and testing bridge decks. Construction cost estimating for these types of projects can be particularly difficult due to the small scale of required work. Our depth of experience on bridge preventive maintenance projects will assist the City with accurately estimating and budgeting costs for these projects. The BPMP work plan has identified two bridges to perform deck coring to test for chloride content. Coring and destructive testing should be limited only for bridges that would benefit and alter their maintenance activities based on the results. The bridge decks will be assessed to verify whether it is warranted to determine a proper rehabilitation plan.Coring decks in good condition preemptively would be an unnecessary cost,as well as result in unnecessary patches and traffic impacts.Deck cores would be tested (per ASTM C1152) for chloride concentrations at different depths within the concrete. If the chloride concentration exceeds the threshold at the depth of the reinforcement,sealing the deck won't prevent future corrosion and a more extensive deck rehabilitation may be needed. STAGE CONSTRUCTION Due to large traffic volumes,providing access during construction is of high importance providing safe work zones to protect construction crews and maintaining vehicular traffic and driveway access to nearby businesses must be planned to minimize disruptions. and will be maintained where feasible. The bridges include a variety of multi-lane roadways, ranging from two lanes to seven lanes. For the eight locations identified, the existing bridge width varies from 51-feet to 102-feet, including sidewalks. Bridges immediately adjacent to intersections will require unique construction/temporary signing and N signaling.Signs will be placed ahead of the work to alert A IL motorists per the most recent version of the California 6' - :zo MUTCD. Full closure alternatives may be evaluated by using either detours or limited night work. Traffic handling for BR# 55C-0055 will encroach into Caltrans Right-of-Way and affect 1-5 offramp operations. An Encroacment Permit will be obtained from the Caltrans District 12 to facilitate stage construction and traffic handling. STATE AND FEDERAL PROCEDURES The City plans to utilize BPMP funds obligated through the Highway Bridge Program (HBP). Following State and Federal guidelines is key to keep federal funding intact.To not jeopardize reimbursement and eligibility, it is critical that the project delivery strictly adheres to the requirements and timelines presented in Chapter 11 of the Caltrans Local Assistance Program Guidelines. Therefore,the development of plans,specifications,and construction cost estimate(PS&E)must follow standard Caltrans (State) and FHWA requirements which include obtaining E-76 approvals, and compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) and full compliance with Chapter 11 of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines. Every Dokken Engineering project requires coordination and compliance with State and/or Federal regulations. Dokken's team of experts have extensive experience working with Caltrans, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal and State Resource Agencies and have a thorough understanding of regulatory processes and standards. Our team understands the Caltrans and FHWA project development process and has obtained invaluable insight into the local agency side of project funding, programming, authorization paperwork, and Federal regulations that apply to local agency project delivery with Caltrans local assistance oversight.We will use these skills and knowledge(from the delivery of over 3,000 projects)to ensure projects are successfully delivered and compliant with oversight agency requirements. Because the City is using federal funds for this project,the process to obtain project approval for funding and developing the PS&E package must follow standard Caltrans and FHWA requirements, which include compliance with NEPA/CEQA and authorizations at major milestones. �11DONNE N 23 - 269 8/4/2r263 E N G IN E E R ING Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A The flow chart to the right identifies the Caltrans Local Assistance process and LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCESS demonstrates our understanding of the paperwork required.Since our team has a proven track record of project delivery, we know this process, not only when exhibits need to be submitted but also when FHWA holds all additional funding requests to close out their fiscal year. Federal Authorization(E-76) Depending on our client's needs, we are available to assist with preparing the for PE Request for Authorization (RFA) packages at all major milestones as well as project development forms (PES, Field Review, Project Change) and project Project Development delivery forms(utility coordination and right of way certification). Exhibit 6A PES Form Exhibit 713 Field Review In addition, Dokken's environmental staff has extensive experience with NEPA/CEQA policies and procedures.We have a close relationship with Caltrans environmental staff, and we will assist the City with all needed Caltrans Federal Authorization(E-76) for R/W paperwork.We will work closely with our design team to ensure projects do not have any unmitigable environmental impacts. We are prepared to address OMMM ME- NO project impacts by including reasonable avoidance and minimization solutions Negotiation and A quire R/W early in the project design phase. Lessons Learned Through our 39 years of experience, our team has gained knowledge from to Owner Exhibit 14E Report of Investigation several valuable lessons learned,which has helped us succeed in delivering our Exhibit 14F Utility Agreement clients' projects with Federal funds. • Have Right of Way Request for Authorization (RFA) reviewed by the Federal Authorization(E-76) District before the NEPA Environmental Document is signed. This for Construction streamlines the approval process whereby we meet with the District 01111111111111� near the end of the environmental process to ensure they understand Advertise,Award,ConstrUCt Project the project and its right of way needs. • Have Construction RFA reviewed by District before PS&E and right of way certifications are submitted. This step includes meeting with the District near the end of the design phase to ensure the District understands the project prior to obtaining their approval on the Construction RFA. • Prepare all utility paperwork in Caltrans format and meet early in the project with the Caltrans District Local Assistance utility coordinator. ENVIRONMENTAL The project will utilize both local and federal funding; therefore, compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)and the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)will be required.The lead agency under NEPA is Caltrans and the lead agency under CEQA is the City. Impacts to biological and cultural resources are not anticipated. The repair work contemplated for this project qualifies to utilize a CEQA Categorical Exemption for existing facilities. For NEPA,the Project is clearly classified as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under 23CFR 771.117 (d)(3) as bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement. Dokken's in-house environmental team obtains environmental approval for multiple bridge projects per year, such as the National Trails Highway 10 Bridge Replacement Project in San Bernardino County and has extensive experience working with Caltrans Local Assistance. Our relationship with Caltrans environmental staff ensures the NEPA environmental process will be driven by the City's schedule. Based on preliminary research,there are limited environmental constraints. The City has an extensive park and trail system. Publicly-owned parks are a resource under Section 4(f)of the Transportation Act. The Santiago Park Nature Reserve, the Santiago Creek Bike Trail and the Santa Ana River Bike Trail were also partially funded under Section 6(f)of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act;therefore,analysis for impacts to protected Section 6(f) resources will be required during NEPA clearance. Consideration should be given to facilitate park and trail activities during construction,even though the effects are of a short duration and temporary. Biological Resources Based on preliminary review, Dokken biologists determined that the proposed work does not have the potential to impact any threatened or endangered species or their habitat. Caltrans will likely require the preparation of a Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts) that would include standard avoidance, and minimization measures applicable to the proposed work. ��ONIKE N 23 — 270 8/4/��a E N G I N E E R I N G Request for Proposals �Q Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program ` 'Ip RFP No.25-081A Permits Below deck work will be required in support of repair activities; however, maintenance work on existing, serviceable structures is considered exempt from Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting and non-exempt work can be authorized under the Regional General Permit (RGP) Number 100 issued to the Orange County Flood Control Division by the Corps of Engineers.Coverage under the RGP still requires filing a Notice of Intent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain a wastewater discharge permit, but this is an expedited process which is included in our scope and fee. Lastly, it is assumed that Orange County Public Works will utilize their existing Streambed Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that authorizes OCPW to conduct routine maintenance. Not having to obtain a USACE or CDFW permit will greatly reduce the City's environmental clearance schedule. Our project management approach is to be an extension of City staff and provide the City an experienced team. Our team will provide the resources and tools necessary to deliver this project with minimal oversight. Gabriel Hoxmeier will be the Project Manager for this project. As Project Manager, Gabriel will be responsible for communicating with the City and providing progress updates, schedule and budget control,facilitating meetings with the City and stakeholders, coordinating quality control activities, managing subconsultants,coordinating right of way acquisitions,and ensuring delivery of all project products culminating with a PS&E that is biddable and buildable. Dokken's project management philosophy is to treat every client as if they are our only client.We are immediately available by phone and e-mail. For us,project management means contract compliance,accurate file systems, budgets and schedules, and assembling the appropriate team to do the job right. It means monitoring subconsultant work, progress reporting, and assisting our clients with the hundreds of details involved with project delivery.Our project management approach includes: • "No Surprises" Communication with our Clients: Dokken maintains constant communication with our clients. Emerging issues are brought to our clients,along with proposed solutions. • Clear,Concise,and Complete Reporting: Dokken's monthly progress reports include accomplished tasks, upcoming tasks, pending issues, and scheduled completion target dates. We coordinate and facilitate regular progress and team meetings and prepare all exhibits and handouts. • Project Schedule Monitoring: Each of Dokken's projects is guided by a project baseline schedule, clearly indicating milestones, major activities, and deliverables at a level of detail appropriate to the project.The schedule drives the project, not the reverse. • Budget Control: The best way to control the budget is to follow the project schedule. This avoids costly over-runs and extended production times. The key to preserving budgets is to start on time, get it right, and submit the deliverable by the deadline. PROJECT COMMUNICATION As an extension of City staff, Gabriel and his team will use a suite of communication mechanisms to keep the City informed and to maintain the project schedule.The following diagram identifies the key communication methods to deliver projects for the City. 1 Weekly Internal I Focus Meetings to Team Meeting 3 Resolve Issues 5 Monthly Proiect Development Team 2 Weekly Email 4 Agency Meetings Update to City Meeting(PDT, Internal:Dokken has long-standing relationships with our subconsultants,and we have established communication protocols that all team members understand. We host weekly internal team conference calls to track progress and keep everyone current on project status and recent decisions that affect their awareness and productivity. External: Our number one goal when working with our clients is successful project delivery. We identify risks early in the process and develop ways to mitigate these risks. We work closely with our clients to keep them informed on the status of their project and any pending decisions,and we are extremely responsive to their needs. �11D ONKE N 23 — 271 8/4/2&26s E N G I N E E R I N G Y^tip` Request for Proposals Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Dokken will also serve as an extension of staff on this contract and as requested can act as the principal point of contact for the City with stakeholders, resource agencies, and utility providers. Gabriel will ensure that the delivery schedule is being managed and that the City is controlling the project schedule and not the agencies. Gabriel will keep the City informed of communications with the outside agencies and elevate key decisions to City staff as required. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL Dokken and our team members are committed to the City to deliver project documents whose quality exceeds the standards in the industry. For our team, quality is not just a priority, it is a core value. The QA/QC procedures will be prepared and implemented in accordance with our scope of work and will be consistent with our company principles.The procedure will incorporate the approach of continuous review of products as they are developed and as a series of formal review procedures enacted at preparation of major deliverables.The policies and procedures will provide documentation that deliverables meet all requirements of the scope of work. The review of deliverables needed to satisfy the QA/QC procedure is built into our proposed schedule.The following flow chart outlines our QA/QC procedures: CHECKER qualified individual BACKCHECKEJnd ORIGINATOR independent of originator Reviews checker VERIFIER Uabled Completes document in reviews document for marked changes aConfirms the corrections itsfinal form and deems technical adequacy and resolves differenchave been incorporated ready for checking conformance to corrections are ma withouterror standards originator We take quality very seriously, as a quality plan set provides the most competitive bidding opportunities for projects and helps keep projects within their overall budgets,ultimately resulting in a high-quality project being built,on time with minimal or no change orders. COST CONTROL AND BUDGETING METHODOLOGY To manage the three interdependent elements found in every project— scope, Project Scoping &Phasing schedule, and budget—it is necessary to implement a sustainable project control methodology. Gabriel, our Project Manager, will develop and implement the project controls plan. The plan outlines the procedures for conducting work, managing project resources, and reporting project status and progress. The project management tools identified on the right assures on time and within Deliverable budget project deliverables. These tools will enable Gabriel to provide a IF systematic approach to deliver any project. All project participants, including the City and Dokken team, will be aware of the project status in order to make informed management decisions. Our tools and system are designed to respond Project Management Plan to these requirements. Aonthly Cash Flow Projection Dokken prepares and maintains project schedules for every project.The schedules PF are monitored, and staffing adjusted to meet milestones. Performance is Risk Management Matrix monitored through quality control checks, review of actual versus planned Monthly Progress Report progress,completion of action items prepared after meetings, monthly invoicing, and progress reporting. Dokken will use the City standards and formats, making invoice review streamlined and familiar to the City. For our team,quality is not just a priority, it is a core value. Dokken has found that the best way to control budget is to ensure the project schedule is followed.This method avoids costly over-runs and extended production times. The key to preserving budgets is to start on time, get it right, and submit the deliverable on time. Utilizing the same design working group from the beginning of the project to the end ensures consistent thought and engineering practice,while eliminating wasteful hours spent"getting familiar"with a project. The MS Project Schedule will be supplemented with a deliverables schedule that identifies all project deliverables and submittal dates.The deliverables schedule is a critical project management tool because it specifies what is being delivered to the client and when it is to be submitted.The deliverables schedule will be updated monthly and submitted as part of the monthly invoice to report on the status of completed,in-progress,and upcoming deliverables.The combination of the budget and schedule showing task durations and sequencing will enable us to produce a time-phased budget. With a time-phased budget and a work-based method of measuring progress,a reliable comparison on planned versus actual can be made. �I'DON E N 23 - 272 8/4/29266 E N G I N E E R I N G Request for Proposals + Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A REFERENCES The following examples highlight Dokken's ability to provide services similar in size, scope, and complexity to the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program project.Together,with the technical specialties of our subconsultants,the Dokken team assures the City that our proven management and quality services will be provided. City of Palm Desert Bridge Maintenance I Palm Desert, CA The City of Palm Desert contracted Dokken to create and implement a City-wide Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program. As a first task, Dokken reviewed the Caltrans inventory of City owned bridges and existing maintenance agreements for each bridge within the City limits to identify any bridges that needed to be added to the Caltrans inventory and coordinated with Caltrans Structures Maintenance and Investigations (SM&I)to submit Request for Bridge Name and Number forms to allow unidentified bridges to be added CLIENT REFERENCE to the Caltrans inventory for routine inspection by Caltrans and eligibility for City of Palm Desert Highway Bridge Program (HBP)funding. Neal Ennis, PE Dokken reviewed all available Bridge Inspection Reports (BIRIS) provided by (760)776-6493 Caltrans and conducted photo documented field investigations of 17 vehicular nennis@palmdesert.gov and pedestrian bridges to confirm Caltrans Bridge Inspection Report findings, identify additional maintenance work recommendations not covered by the inspection reports, and develop preliminary construction cost estimates to perform the preventive maintenance work for each bridge. Dokken then collaborated with the City to develop a ranking procedure and prioritization plan complying with the Caltrans Bridge Preventive Maintenance Guidelines for Local Agencies, and summarized the findings in a Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program report.A comprehensive Bridge Preventive Maintenance Plan spreadsheet conforming to the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Guidelines, detailing bridge locations, applicable sufficiency ratings, work descriptions, and total HBP eligible participating cost share items was developed and submitted to Caltrans Local Assistance and Headquarters for approval and programming. Dokken worked closely with the City to develop a strategize a phased approach to implementing bridge preventive maintenance improvements given the City's budget allocations for maintenance over the next five fiscal years.The first phase of implementation included the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for the preventive maintenance of five vehicular structures.Work included concrete spall repair,expansion joint removal and replacement, installation of concrete expansion dams at select locations to prevent asphalt concrete overlays from fouling expansion joints, and the repair of a corrugated metal pipe arch (CMPA) culvert bank that included partial removal of damaged CMPA sections and splicing on new SCMPA sections utilizing a metal collar. Construction for the first phase was completed in November 2023.The second phase of implementation includes the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for the preventive maintenance of two vehicular structures, with an anticipated start of construction in Spring 2025. Proposed work includes a methacrylate overlay, existing joint seal replacement, and side-drain ditch repairs for the Tierra Del Oro bridge over the South Palm Canyon Wash, and asphalt concrete removal, methacrylate overlay, and new asphalt concrete overlay for the Palm Canyon Drive Bridge over the Rancho Mirage Channel. Approach roadway on both ends of the bridges will undergo a grind and overlay as a. part of this project. Stage Construction,Traffic ` \�1 Control, and Temporary Traffic Modification h plans are included as part of this work. �111)@(KK1E N 23 - 273 8/4/2r267 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals �Q Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program ` 'Ip RFP No.25-081A Master Agreement Consulting Services - Structural Engineering I Carlsbad, CA 2016-2017 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program: As part of a Master Service Agreement contract, Dokken was tasked with reviewing existing Caltrans Bridge Inspection Reports, the existing Bridge Preventive amp Maintenance Program (BPMP) report and conducting field investigations with accompanying documentation memorandum for 10 individual vehicular and pedestrian bridges scheduled for upcoming maintenance within the City of Carlsbad. Dokken worked closely with the City to °� lie _ determine immediate priority for bridge repair work,and developed PS&E for the preventive maintenance of the Calle Barcelona Pedestrian Overcrossing and the Poinsettia Lane Overhead; spanning over the North k County Transit District (NCTD) owned tracks near the Pacific Coast. Plans and Specifications were also developed to replace the original bridge railings as well as repair the sidewalk approach railings which suffered from severe concrete spalling and corrosion from improper concrete cover over reinforcement and marine environment exposure. Railroad coordination was required due to work directly over NCTD tracks. 2018-2019 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program:The City of Carlsbad contacted Dokken Engineering for the PS&E for bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two � + structures. Jefferson Street Bridge involved providing a methacrylate overlay to seal existing deck cracks, replacement and repairs to existing bridge railings and metal beam guard railing approach systems, as well as — sidewalk remediation to meet ADA standards. El Camino Real Bridge at San Marcos Creek involved methacrylate � :. - overlay in multiple stages with traffic handling plans reviewed and approved by Caltrans to receive the Encroachment Permit to perform the work. Pressure grouting of deteriorated slopes below sidewalk curb i ramps was performed to mitigate more costly repairs in the future. 2022 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program — Field Review and Documentation Memorandum:This task included the review of the existing Bridge Inspection Reports(BIR),the existing Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) report to confirm maintenance work items and update the City's BPMP Prioritization list,and field CLIENT REFERENCE investigations and photo documentation of the remaining 24 bridges in the City of Carlsbad City's inventory not previously documented in the 2016-2017 program. Emad Elias, PE Maintenance needs in comparison with the existing BIRs and BPMP and close (formerly with the City of Carlsbad) communication with the City helped to determine the priority of bridge repair (760) 744-1050 x3225 works.A comprehensive photo-documented memorandum with itemized cost eelias@san-marcos.net estimates was prepared detailing recommended bridge preventive maintenance work for each bridge. �� 23 - 274 8/4/2r268 E N G IN E E R ING Request for Proposals + — Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Orange County Bridge Maintenance Orange County, CA Dokken is providing engineering services for maintenance on multiple bridges throughout Orange County. Plans, specifications, and estimates have been CLIENT REFERENCE prepared for maintenance repairs of 28 bridges. Project tasks included field Co Phung, PE Orange County Public Works inspections to identify repair needs,developing PS&E,attending meetings with (714) construction staff including Job Order Contracting(JOC)staff,preparing Erosion 245-4594 45 and Sediment Control Plans,and field visits during construction. co.phung@ocpw.ocgov.com Projects were selected from a previous study prepared by Dokken in which most County bridges were inspected, maintenance repair needs identified, and a repair prioritization list developed. Maintenance needs have included concrete spall repair, polyester concrete overlays,joint seal replacements,erosion control and scour measures, barrier rail repairs, approach sidewalk replacement, addressing drainage problem and resulting erosion,and epoxy crack injection. Repair projects of specific interest include: Kitterman Drive 55CO176 Kitterman Drive: Due to concrete RSP combined with extremely high creek velocities, localized scour was exacerbated downstream of the concreted RSP. In lieu of constructing a series of cut-off walls buttressed with large RSP over 300ft downstream, "" the fully grouted concrete rock slope protection was removed, the creek bottom was restored, and RSP along with hydroseed was provided along the creek banks to help - mitigate the undermining of the abutments and retaining walls. 55CO606 Oso Parkway: In addition to preventive maintenance needs, joint seal replacement and clearing and flushing deck drains, significant abutment slope embankment erosion was repaired and water dripping from a bridge cell was investigated. With the help of a manlift operator and a Confined Space Entry team, l Dokken inspected the bridge cell.The inspection revealed the water source was flowing from the detached electrical conduits,with water entering the conduits from beyond the .p bridge abutment. Maintenance repairs are ongoing. y , 55CO122 and 55CO123 Brea Canyon: The existing open window barrier is experiencing woo concrete spalling and decay.Since these bridges are scheduled for replacement,in lieu of total barrier replacement, nested double thrie beam was mounted to the face of the Brea Canyon barrier. This approach yielded significant cost savings and avoided environmental historical review of the barrier. `;.- 55CO631 Harbor Boulevard: A fire in front of the abutment caused precast girders to spall. Dokken inspected and categorized the spall locations and developed PS&E for the repair. 55CO017 Lincoln Avenue and 55CO097 Talbert-MacArthur:Approach sidewalks at both ` bridges had significant spalls and settlement due to bridge thermal expansion. Repairs included reconstructing the sidewalk to repair damage and meet ADA. 55CO572 Irvine Avenue: The top slab of this culvert/bridge has significant cracks and ,, ,'_-v, _- efflorescence is leaching onto the soffit. Repairs include epoxy crack injection into the soffit and wall crack. GARB FLEET COMPLIANCE Dokken Engineering and our subconsultants' vehicles are exempt from the CARB Fleet Compliance requirements and therefore cannot provide Certificates of Reported Compliance. Our team's Fleet Compliance Certification (Attachment J) is included in the Required Forms section of this proposal. Ia�ONKIE N 23 - 275 8/4/��9 E NGINEERING q 0 ras d REQUIRED FORMS 00 1 _ kk SSS 1 III i - IIII I i I d - f Vol. _ . .� , r i City Council 23 — 276 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT A PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION, PROPOSAL PRICING Certification - I certify that I have read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposals. I have examined the Scope of Services (Exhibit 1) and am qualified to provide services being requested as specified herein. I understand and agree that I am responsible for reporting any errors, omissions or discrepancies to the City for clarification prior to the submission of my proposal. PROPOSER'S STATEMENT: I have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions on all pages of the Request for Proposals. Upon request, I will transfer and deliver goods or services to the City in accordance with said terms and conditions. Dokken Engineering (916) 858-0642 / (916) 858-0643 LEGAL NAME OF COMPANY PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS 110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630 BUSINESS ADDRESS John A. Klemunes Jr., PE President PRINTED NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT TITLE Ad � 07/08/2025 jklemunes@dokkenengineering.com SIGNXrURE OF AUTHORIZE AGENT DATE E-MAIL ADDRESS 68-0099664 N/A FEDERAL ID NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER (IFAPPLICABLE) N/A CITY OF SANTA ANA BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER (PLEASE PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE, BUT NOT REQUIRED UNTIL AND IF AN AWARD IS MADE TO PROPOSER.) THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 277 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT B PROPOSER'S STATEMENT Proposer understands and agrees that this written RFP (or any part thereof specifically designated and accepted by the City of Santa Ana, hereinafter City)shall constitute the entire agreement between proposer and the City only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Executive Director or his duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to proposer or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the proposer with the correct postage affixed thereto. Proposer further agrees that upon delivery(as defined above)of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish City all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and City's legal holidays), or the funds, check, draft, or proposer's bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the City and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by City because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered by City is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check drafts, or proposer's bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned. Proposer understands that a proposal is required for the entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the RFP schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing proposals, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. All terms contained in the specifications, the certification of nondiscrimination by contractors, and the required insurance certificates are to be incorporated by reference into this agreement and are made specifically as part of this RFP. Firm Dokken Engineering Signed and Printed Name: John A. Klemunes Jr., PE /✓ L �� Title President Date 07/08/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 278 8/4/2026 ' CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT C NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the proposer declares that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price of the proposer or any proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the proposal price, or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the proposal are true; and, further, that the proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. Note: The above non-collusion affidavit is part of the proposal. Signing this proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this non-collusion affidavit. Proposers are cautioned that making a false certification may subject e certif" r to criminal prosecution. Signed State of County of Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of 20 , by . proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Sce- c;Act-cLkeA Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 279 8/4/2026 CALIFORNIA JURAT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness,accuracy,or validity of that document. 1 I State of California ) County of Sg C ra YVn ) Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of v� vl 20 ZS by J0�Av,, �• 1�1tAAUAQ-S r I proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(' who appeared before me. CAMRAN SADEGHI COMM. #2473373 z %My Notary Public• Californiao zSacramento County Comm.Expires Nov.22,2027 Signature 4At (Seal) Optional Information Although the information in this section is not required by law,it could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this jurat to an unauthorized document and may prove useful to persons relying on the attached document. Description of Attached Document This certificate is attached to a document titled/for the purpose of Method ofAffiant Identification ` 1 Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence: 1`} O sclA+-'\ "�-A Gt 0 form(s)of identification 0 credible witness(es) Ak��CAA C— Notarial event is detailed in notary journal on: Page# Entry# Notary contact: Other containing pages, and dated ❑Affia nt(s)Thum bprint(s) ❑ Describe: O CopyrightGOYO"UWA ry,PO Box 41400,Des Moines,IA 50311-0507. All Rights Reserved 25 7—umn( 1884 Please contact your Authorized Reseller toW412 or this form CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT D NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Signed: Title: President Firm: Dokken Engineering Date: 07/08/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 281 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT E NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 1. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 2. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1)through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract City Council 23 — 282 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). X The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Dokken Engineering Bidder's Com any Name (please print or type) �d IZL�Y1rZs, SignatiRe of Bidder John A. Klemunes Jr., PE Print Name President Title N/A DOORS ID *Dokken Engineering operates a standard fleet of vehicles that are not subject to the provisions outlined in the referenced regulation. Our fleet vehicles do not contain diesel trucks, off-road engines, etc. Therefore Dokken Engineering is exempt from this Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9. THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 283 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Burne Engineering Services, Inc Bidder'sCOmnanv Name (please print or type) Signature of Bidder Pranvera DeSafey Print Name Operations Manager Title N/A DOORS ID THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. City Council 23 — 284 8/4/2026 Burne Engineering operates a standard fleet of vehicles that are not subject to the provisions outlined in the referenced regulation. Our fleet vehicles do not contain diesel trucks, off-road engines, etc. Therefore, Burne Engineering is exempt from this Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9. City Council 23 — 285 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). X The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Geocon Consultants, Inc. Bidder's Company Name (please print or type) S'nature of Bidder Josh Ewert, PG Print Name Vice President Title N/A DOORS ID THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 286 8/4/2026 <0-1r) GEOCON CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Geocon is exempt because we will not be using any off-road vehicles or even diesel-fueled vehicles for this project.The only vehicles we're likely to use are trucks running on unleaded gasoline. City Council 23 — 287 8/4/2026 �l CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board's policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the "Regulation"). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder's fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) ("Fleet") is true and correct: u The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto. F1 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. u Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). u The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4). X The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. OPTIME CONSULTING GROUP Bid ?.Co any Name (please print or type) Si na ure idder KAMRAN AMINI Print Name Principal Title N/A DOORS ID THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 288 8/4/2026 C TIME nsu lting group June 29, 2025 OPTIME Consulting Group 7244 Hillside Ave, Unit 201 Los Angeles, CA 90046 To Whom It May Concern, Optime Consulting Group owns no off-road diesel equipment. Any gear we bring to the project will be electric or, if needed, rented equipment; we will operate no diesel off-road units, so Title 13 CCR§2449 does not apply, and no DOORS fleet ID is required. Sincerely, Optime Consulting Group Kamran Amini, Ph.D., P.E. Principal & Senior Consultant KAmini@OptimeCG.com Phone: +1 (216) 577 — 4173 City Council 23 — 289 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. Signed: /J Title: President Firm: Dokken Engineering Date: 07/08/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 290 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. Signed: Title: Operations Manager Firm: Burne Engineering Services, Inc Date: 06/27/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 291 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. Signed: Title: Josh Ewert, PG I Vice President Firm: Geocon Consultants, Inc. Date: June 30, 2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 292 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT H STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA) REQUIREMENTS This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents. /. A . . Signed: - L Title: Principal Firm: Optime Consulting Group Date: 6/29/2025 THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 293 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT I SAM.GOV UEI VERIFICATION On April 4, 2022, the federal government stopped using the DUNS Number to uniquely identify entities. Now, entities doing business with the federal government use the Unique Entity ID created in SAM.gov. They no longer have to go to a third-party website to obtain their identifier. This transition allows the government to streamline the entity identification and validation process, making it easier and less burdensome for entities to do business with the federal government. This RFP includes federal funding, and as such, the proposer must provide verification of their SAM.gov UEI and registration status. Please attach your entity's registration from SAM.gov, including UEI and active registration status. Proposer's UEI: DDLGPKSSAGQ7 SAM.gov Registration Expiration Date: 12/13/2025 City Council 23 — 294 8/4/2026 Last updated by Amber Smith on Dee 13,2024 ai 01.33 PH DOKKEN ENGINEERING �!!SAM*Gov® DOKKEN ENGINEERING Unique Entity ID CAGE/NCAGE Purpose of Registration DDLGPKSSAGQ7 1D7N3 All Awards Registration Status Expiration Date Active Registration Dec 13,2025 Physical Address Mailing Address 110 Blue Ravine RD 110 Blue Ravine RD STE 200 STE 200 Folsom,California 95630-4713 Folsom,California 95630-4713 United States United States tion Doing Business as Division Name Division Number (blank) (blank) (blank) Congressional District State/Country of Incorporation URL California 03 California/United States (blank) Registration Dates Activation Date Submission Date Initial Registration Date Dec 17,2024 Dec 13,2024 Jun 1,2000 Entity Dates Entity Start Date Fiscal Year End Close Date Jun 20,1986 Dec 31 Immediate Owner CAGE Legal Business Name (blank) (blank) Highest Level Owner CAGE Legal Business Name (blank) (blank) Executive Compensation In your business or organization's preceding completed fiscal year,did your business or organization(the legal entity to which this specific SAM record, represented by a Unique Entity ID,belongs)receive both of the following: 1.80 percent or more of your annual gross revenues in U.S.federal contracts, subcontracts,loans,grants,subgrants,and/or cooperative agreements and 2.$25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from U.S.federal contracts, subcontracts,loans,grants,subgrants,and/or cooperative agreements? No Does the public have access to information about the compensation of the senior executives in your business or organization(the legal entity to which this specific SAM record,represented by a Unique Entity ID,belongs)through periodic reports filed under section 13(a)or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C.78m(a),78o(d))or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986? Not Selected Proceedings Questions Is your business or organization,as represented by the Unique Entity ID on this entity registration,responding to a Federal procurement opportunity that contains the provision at FAR 52.209-7,subject to the clause in FAR 52.209-9 in a current Federal contract,or applying for a Federal grant opportunity which contains the award term and condition described in 2 C.F.R.200 Appendix XII? No Does your business or organization,as represented by the Unique Entity ID on this specific SAM record, have current active Federal contracts and/or grants with total value(including any exercised/unexercised options)greater than$10,000,000? Not Selected Within the last five years,had the business or organization(represented by the Unique Entity ID on this specific SAM record)and/or any of its principals,in connection with the award to or performance by the business or organization of a Federal contract or grant,been the subject of a Federal or State(1) criminal proceeding resulting in a conviction or other acknowledgment of fault;(2)civil proceeding resulting in a finding of fault with a monetary fine,penalty, reimbursement,restitution,and/or damages greater than$5,000,or other acknowledgment of fault;and/or(3)administrative proceeding resulting in a finding of fault with either a monetary fine or penalty greater than$5,000 or reimbursement,restitution,or damages greater than$100,000,or other acknowledgment of fault? Not SelecteCity Council 23 —295 8/4/2026 Mai,20,2025 03:30:47 PM GMT https://smec.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ7/coreData.�status=mtll Page l of 3 Last updated by Amber Smith on Dee 13,2024 at 01.33 PH DOKKEN ENGINEERING Active Exclusions Records? No uthorizatiomw I authorize my entity's non-sensitive information to be displayed in SAM public search results: Yes Entity Types 3 Business Types Entity Structure Entity Type Organization Factors Corporate Entity(Not Tax Exempt) Business or Organization (blank) Profit Structure For Profit Organization Socio-Economic Types Check the registrant's Reps&Certs,if present,under FAR 52.212-3 or FAR 52.219-1 to determine if the entity is an SBA-certified HUBZone small business concern.Additional small business information may be found in the SBA's Dynamic Small Business Search if the entity completed the SBA supplemental pages during registration. king ncial Inform", I Accepts Credit Card Payments Debt Subject To Offset No No EFT Indicator CAGE Code 0000 1D7N3 Electronic Funds Transfer Account Type Routing Number Lock Box Number Checking *******27 (blank) Financial Institution Account Number JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,NA *******33 Automated Clearing House Phone(U.S.) Email Phone(non-U.S.) 8134323700 (blank) (blank) Fax (blank) Remittance Address DOKKEN ENGINEERING 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 Folsom,California 95630 United States Taxpayer Information EIN Type of Tax Taxpayer Name *****9664 Applicable Federal Tax DOKKEN ENGINEERING Tax Year(Most Recent Tax Year) Name/Title of Individual Executing Consent TIN Consent Date 2021 Chairman Dec 13,2024 Address Signature 110 Blue Ravine RD STE 200 RICHARD DOKKEN Folsom,California 95630 Points of Contact Accounts Receivable POC 0 Amber Smith asmi580642 It o 7 l 23 -296 8/4/2026 916858064 y Mai,20,2025 03:30:47 PM GMT https://smec.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ7/coreData.�status=mtll Page 2 of 3 Last updated by Amber Smith on Dee 13,2024 ai 01.33 Alf DOKKEN ENGINEERING Electronic Business 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 Cathy Chan Folsom,California 95630 cchan@dokkenengineering.com United States 9168580642 CATHY CHAN 100 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 cchan@dokkenengineering.com Folsom,California 95630 9168580642 United States Government Business 1. 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 Camran Sadeghi Folsom,California 95630 csadeghi@dokkenengineering.com United States 9168580642 John Klemunes,President 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 jklemunes@dokkenengineering.com Folsom,California 95630 9168580642 United States Past Performance 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 RICHARD DOKKEN,Chairman Folsom,California 95630 radokken@demail.com United States 9168580642 RICHARD LIPTAK,CEO 110 Blue Ravine ROAD,Suite 200 rliptak@demail.com Folsom,California 95630 9168580642 United States NAICS Codes Primary NAICS Codes NAICS Title Yes 541330 Engineering Services Size Metrics IGT Size Metrics Annual Revenue(from all IGTs) (blank) Worldwide Annual Receipts(in accordance with 13 CFR 121) Number of Employees(in accordance with 13 CFR 121) $33,562,026.00 153 Location Annual Receipts(in accordance with 13 CFR 121) Number of Employees(in accordance with 13 CFR 121) (blank) (blank) Industry-Specific Barrels Capacity Megawatt Hours Total Assets (blank) (blank) (blank) ylectronic Data Interchange(EDI)Information This entity did not enter the EDI information Emir- This entity does not appear in the disaster response registry. City Council 23 —297 8/4/2026 Mai,20,2025 03:30:47 PM GMT https://smec.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ71coreData.�status=mtll Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT J CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INEGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, as amended, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension, 2 CFR Part 2998, Subpart C, Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988, Federal Register(Pages 19160-19211), and as subsequently amended in 81 Federal Register 25585. (Before completing certification, read instructions which are an integral part of certification) 1. Pursuant to 2 CFR 180.335, the prospective primary participant, (i.e. grantee) certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: a. Are not presently excluded or disqualified; b. Have not been convicted within the preceding three years of any of the offenses listed in 2CFR 180.800(a) or had a civil judgment rendered against them for one of those offenses within that time period. c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses listed in 2 CFR 180.800(a);and d. Have not had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or default. 2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Dokken Engineering Consultant John A. Klemunes Jr., PE, President Name and Title of Official Authorized to Certify On Behalf of the Consultant 07/08/2025 Date THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City Council 23 — 298 8/4/2026 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTACHMENT K FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS — CALTRANS FORMS (Refer to the following Forms) City Council 23 — 299 8/4/2026 Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-01 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment EXHIBIT 10-01 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: City of Santa Ana 2.Contract DBE Goal: 4% 3. Project Description: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight(8)bridges 4. Project Location: Various Locations in Santa Ana 5. Consultant's Name: Dokken Engineering,Inc. 6. Prime Certified DBE: 7. Description of Work,Service,or Materials 8. DBE a Supplied Certification 9. DBE Contact Information 10. DBE /o Number Burne Engineering,Inc. Structures Design 39259 5137 Golden Foothill Pkwy,Suite 100 6% El Dorado Hills,CA 95762 Local Agency to Complete this Section 17. Local Agency Contract Number: 11.TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION 6 18. Federal-Aid Project Number: Consultant's Ranking after Evaluation: IMPORTANT:Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on regardless of tier.Written confirmation of each listed DBE is this form is complete and accurate. required. AdZL 07/08/2025 21. Local Agency Representative's Signature 22• Date 02. Preparer's Signature 13. Date John A.Klemunes Jr.,PE (916)858-0642 23. Local Agency Representative's Name 24. Phone 14. Preparer's Name 15.Phone President 25. Local Agency Representative's Title 16. Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: Original—Included with consultant's proposal to local agency. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities,this document is available in alternate formats. For information call(916)654-6410 or TDD(916)654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814. LPP 18-01 Page 1 of 2 City Council 23 — 300 g/* &v 2019 Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-02 Consultant Contract DBE Commitment EXHIBIT 10-02 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: City of Santa Ana 2.Contract DBE Goal: 4% 3. Project Description: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight (8) bridges 4. Project Location: Various Locations in Santa Ana 5. Consultant's Name: Dokken Engineering 6. Prime Certified DBE: ❑ 7.Total Contract Award Amount: $757,183 8.Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: $167,833 9.Total Number of ALL Subconsultants: 3 10. Description of Work,Service,or Materials 11. DBE 13. DBE Supplied Certification 12. DBE Contact Information Dollar Number Amount Burne Engineering,Inc. Structures Design 39259 5137 Golden Foothill Pkwy,Suite 100 $48,183 El Dorado Hills,CA 95762 Local Agency to Complete this Section 20. Local Agency Contract $48,183 NiimhAr 14.TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION 21. Federal-Aid Project Number: 22. Contract Execution 6 % nata. Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, this form is complete and accurate. regardless of tier.Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required. 14d07/08/2025 23. Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date 19. Preparer's Signature 16. Date John A.Klemunes Jr.,PE (916)858-0642 25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26. Phone 17.Preparer's Name 18. Phone President 27. Local Agency Representative's Title 19.Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original—Local Agency 2. Copy—Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer(DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities,this document is available in alternate formats. For information call(916)654-6410 or TDD(916)654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814. Page 1 of 2 City Council 23 — 301 8/4?Z02114,2015 z z z a z ¢ o. � w m z � yFF 7 w c oc" o � _ Lai o G V O C o= � F 2 �lvyaay lwvawvvnnug o auueld Iquawvv,leug ueld Iquawuo,nug a,cuossy « Z,a uela le�uawuo inug,vryaS a auueldledlaul,d ua5evew 1e]uawu.—H V Z z——la lu,uawuo inug,v!uas /peag vluawuv,lnug I CN 19 z xalulgaaf O 00 Y 00 � �allu,ad/(Itlg C ❑V3--s z,aa�la�g��nslssv z—.12.gal o—V Z,aaol2.3 loas Z,aaal2ag — — a,claossy/peag aXpug ,gd•sale,ow eI—geq Z--N.g a,claossy/peag.(e.wpeoy o egg•weyeurymig-2P w ,V8 w ga/tla .ga•�ew,coo�a�aas ol aSaeNJ u!Iudnui�d xgd•!aeuauy sal,ey� - - ,aseeew aaia,a rgd',ap.—H pa qy!) O } 2 � O 25 EE 7 _ L ¢ tj F F �z Aw o U ® y U Q Q v o 0 Z Q 0 T R H � W O O Z V W C F � z O F F F �oz LC — F� 00 F 2 Il uelaluyaay bulAe�a I ueuluyaoy smm-a Z m �Iuyaay UtltlJ�S z m 2 as uibugzue�slssy P—MN ssna auang i�u'I _ _ Q F CN o c N 1H L—L F N V FAO C F� 00 F 2 .,aanlan��nlnas z F > �ue�Insuo� Z sWsagsy payq.�a� ° Z LMdl lueynsuo� so�sagsy payiya� 8uissaaoad paoM 1suelaad5 SID �s!$oloaN�aa[oad asl5oloa�.w ryas r 2 E F = o 0 3= O Co _ E F E > o 2 N lz V Ta W w F F F xz O � Az 0 w a ® U Y U EXHIBIT 5 AGREEMENT WITH DOKKEN ENGINEERING TO PROVIDE BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 4th day of August, 2026 by and between Dokken Engineering ("Contractor"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On June 5, 2025, the City issued Request for Proposals ("UP") No. 25-081A, by which it sought Contractors to provide Bridge Preventative Maintenance Services. B. Contractor submitted a responsive proposal that was selected by the City. Contractor represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 25-081A. The negotiated scope is attached as Exhibit A. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Contractor represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Contractor under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Contractor shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed$572,935, including any extension periods. b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City and Contractor agree that all payments due and owing under this Agreement shall be made through Automated Clearing House (ACH)transfers. Contractor agrees to execute the City's standard ACH Vendor Payment Authorization and provide required documentation. Upon verification of the data provided, the City will be authorized to deposit payments directly into Contractor's account(s) with financial institutions. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance Page l of 15 City Council 23 — 304 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above for a two (2) vear term with the option for the City to grant up to three(3), one-year extensions, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 16, below. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on"public works" and"maintenance"projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or"maintenance"project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Contractor shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer-employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Contractor performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Contractor shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Contractor shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Contractor shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in Page 2 of 15 City Council 23 — 305 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Insurance requirements attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated by reference. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1)for personal injury, damages,just compensation,restitution,judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and(2) from any claim that personal injury, damages,just compensation, restitution,judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages,just compensation,restitution,judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify,hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution,judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding.Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence,recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Contractor shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent,trademark, or copyright infringement,including costs,contained in the work product or documents provided by Contractor to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS Contractor shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created Page 3 of 15 City Council 23 — 306 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Contractor receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Contractor agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance,but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information"shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that(a)has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b)is,through no fault of the Contractor disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Contractor without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or(e) is independently developed by the Contractor without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE a. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, agent, or board member with a real or apparent conflict of interest may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by the Federal award. A conflict of interest includes when the employee, officer, agent, or board member, any member of their immediate family, their partner, or an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a contract. An employee, officer, agent, and board member of the recipient or subrecipient may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors. However, the recipient or subrecipient may set standards for situations where the financial interest is not substantial or a gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The recipient's or subrecipient's standards of conduct must also provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations by its employees, officers, agents, or board members. b. If the recipient or subrecipient has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian Tribe, the recipient or subrecipient must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest mean that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization,the recipient or subrecipient is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. Page 4 of 15 City Council 23 — 307 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 c. Contractor covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests,direct or indirect,which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. d. No immediate family members of either the Mayor, City Council Member, or any appointed City Official, including appointed board and commission members, as defined under the City's Municipal Code, whose position with the City shall award or influence the award of this Agreement, or any competing contract or amendment thereof, shall be employed in any capacity by the Contractor or have any other direct or indirect financial benefit or interest in this Agreement. e. The section also prohibits the awarding of any agreement, contract, grant, or any amendment to those awards, to any former full-time employee for one-year from date of employee separation except for any CalPERS retiree as authorized by City Council resolution £ The Contractor must comply with all conflict of interest laws, ordinances, and regulations now in effect or hereafter to be enacted during the term of this Agreement. The Contractor warrants that it is not now aware of any facts which conflict with the prohibitions defined above. If the Contractor hereafter becomes aware of any facts that might reasonably be expected to create a conflict of interest,it must immediately make full written disclosure of such facts to the City. Full written disclosure must include, but is not limited to,identification of all persons implicated and a complete description of all relevant circumstances. Failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph will be a material breach of this Agreement. g. Contractor covenants that none of its directors, officers, employees, or agents shall participate in selecting or administrating any subcontract supported(in whole or in part) by City funds stemming from the Agreement where the awarding of the subcontract has any direct or indirect financial benefit or interest to any individual, as defined in subsections (d) and(e) above. 13. NON-DISCRIMINATION Contractor shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed,religion, sex,marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Contractor affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Page 5 of 15 City Council 23 — 308 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 Contractor, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to,the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Contractor or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor, Contractor may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Contractors retained by City. 16. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event,Contractor shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Contractor compensation for all services performed by Contractor prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Contractor to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Contractor consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 17. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar,nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 18. JURISDICTION-VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be Page 6 of 15 City Council 23 — 309 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 19. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Contractor shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Contractor shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 20. FEDERAL REGULATIONS Contractor shall comply with all applicable contractual provisions required by the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as set for the in 2 CRF Part 200, whether or not expressly set forth in this document, including but not limited to those provisions set forth below. Notwithstanding, anything to the contrary herein, including without limitation , the language in this Agreement, the actual language contained in federal statutes, federal regulations, federally promulgated materials and state statutes, shall control in determining any obligations under federal law in the event of a conflict with any terms, language or provisions contained in this Agreement. Contractor shall not perform any act,fail to perform any act,or refuse to comply with any requests, which would cause City to be in violation of the federal terms and conditions. a. Federal Regulations—Recipient must comply with the government cost principles,uniform administrative requirements and audit requirements for federal grant program housed within Title 2, Part 180 of the Code of Federal Regulations. b. Debarment and Suspension — As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 CFR §200.214 and codified in 2 CFR Part 200, Recipient must provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the Federal government. C. Audit Records —With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall be made available for audit and inspection by CITY, the grant agency and/or their duly authorized representatives for a period of three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the City of Santa Ana. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Recipient shall preserve and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time period, Recipient shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises of Recipient, upon request during usual working hours. Page 7 of 15 City Council 23 — 310 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 d. Reports—Recipient shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or agencies. e. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) — All recipients of federal funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act). Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Recipient agrees it will ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be binding on all of its contractors, subcontractors, assignees or successors. f. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 — (ADA) Recipient must comply with all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable. g. Political Activity—None of the funds, materials,property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of the provisions of the "Hatch Act". h. No Lobbying — Recipient will comply with all applicable lobbying prohibitions and laws, including those found in the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment(31 U.S.C. 1352,et seq.),and agrees that none of the funds provided under this award may be expended by the Recipient to pay any person to influence, or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any federal action concerning the award or renewal of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. i. Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity —Recipient will comply,and all its contractors (or subrecipients)will comply,with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972, as amended; Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, as amended; Section 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912, as amended; Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and 39. In the event a Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative agency, or the Recipient makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Recipient will forward a copy of the findings to CITY which will, in turn, submit the findings to the Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. If applicable, recipient will comply with the equal opportunity clause in 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended Page 8 of 15 City Council 23 — 311 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 by Executive Order No. 11375. j. Equal Employment Opportunity — Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as applicable. k. Public Contracts Code — Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the California Public Contract Code Section 10295.3, as applicable. 1. Copeland "Anti-Kickback" Act — Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients)will comply,with all requirements of the Copeland"Anti-Kickback"Act(40 U.S.C. 3145) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable. in. Davis-Bacon Act — Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144 and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. n. Work Hours and Safety —Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. o. Clean Air Act — I. The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. 2. The contractor agrees to report each violation to CITY and understands and agrees that the CITY will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office. 3. The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FEMA. p. Energy and Conservation —Recipient will comply, and all its contractors(or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201), as applicable. q. Waste Disposal — Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as applicable. r. Patent Rights—Recipient agrees that the Department of Homeland Security shall have the Page 9 of 15 City Council 23 — 312 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 authority to seek patent rights for any process,product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding through this Agreement based on the requirements of 37 CFR§ 401 and any other implementing regulations, as applicable. S. Copyright — Recipient may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding agency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and/or City purpose: (1) the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and (2) any rights of copyright to which the subcontractor purchases ownership with support through this grant. The Federal government's, SAA's and City's rights identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the publisher's release form must ensure the preservation of these rights. t. Equal Employment in Construction Contracts — Pursuant to Equal Employment Opportunity requirements of 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375, as to any construction contract thereunder, if applicable, during the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows: (1)The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color,religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race,color,religion, sex, sexual orientation,gender identity,or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2)The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions Page 10 of 15 City Council 23 — 313 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information. (4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules,regulations,and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (7) In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule,regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. (8) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph(1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through(8)in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. U. Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment—Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients)will comply, with all requirements under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.216. Recipient will comply with FEMA Policy 405-143-1, Prohibitions on Expending FEMA Award Funds on Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services (Interim), which prohibits grant recipients and Page l l of 15 City Council 23 — 314 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 subrecipients from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to procure or obtain, extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, or to enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment: (1) Telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (2) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities,physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation,Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company(or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (3) Telecommunications or video surveillance services produced by such entities or using such equipment. (4) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. V. Domestic Preferences for Procurements/Subcontracts — Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients)will comply, with all requirements under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.322. Recipient shall comply with the federal and recipient standards in the award of any subcontracts. For purposes of this Agreement, subcontracts shall include but not be limited to purchase agreements, rental or lease agreements, third party agreements, consultant service contracts and construction subcontracts. Recipient shall ensure that the terms of this Agreement with the CITY are incorporated into all Subcontractor Agreements. The recipient shall submit all Subcontractor Agreements to the CITY for review prior to the release of any funds to the subcontractor. The recipient shall withhold funds to any subcontractor agency that fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and their respective Subcontractor Agreement. (1) Recovered Materials Recipient shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance Page 12 of 15 City Council 23 — 315 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 schedule; Meeting contract performance requirements; or at a reasonable price. Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA's Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines webpage: https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. The Contractor also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. (2) Domestic Preference for Procurements Recipient should, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for the purchase,acquisition,or use of goods,products,or materials produced in the United States. This includes,but is not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products. For purposes of this clause: Produced in the United States means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. Manufactured products mean items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber. W. Termination for Cause and Convenience — Should recipient fail for any reason to comply with the contractual obligations of this agreement within the time specified by this Agreement, the CITY reserves the right to terminate the Agreement, reserving all rights under state and federal law. X. Contractual/Legal Remedies for Breach of Contract— Should recipient fail for any reason to comply with the contractual obligations of this Agreement and/or willfully, knowingly or negligently breach any term, condition or requirement of the agreement, City may impose sanctions including but not limited to damages (liquidated damages and or penalties) and/or any other remedy available pursuant to the Agreement of the laws then in effect. 21. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Page 13 of 15 City Council 23 — 316 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 City Clerk City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza(M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 With courtesy copies to: Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-xx) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 To Contractor: Dokken Engineering Attention: Gabriel Hoxmeier 1450 Frazee Road, Suite100 San Diego, CA 92108 A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four(24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 23. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. Page 14 of 15 City Council 23 — 317 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA JENNIFER L. HALL ALVARO NUNEZ City Clerk City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR: SONIA R. CARVALHO DOKKEN ENGINEERING City Attorney By: . Kyle llesen y:John A.Klemunes,Jr. Assistant City Attorney Title: President RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: cesav E Dan`eva Cesar E Barrera(Jul 23,2026 08:25:04 PDT) Rodolfo Rosas, P.E. Acting Executive Director Public Works Agency Page 15 of 15 City Council 23 — 318 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBIT A City Council 23 — 319 8/4/2026 Scope of Services4i� Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT(30% PLANS) Task 1.1 Project Coordination Dokken Engineering's project management will include regular virtual meetings, in-person deliveries, presentation of work products, development and monitoring of action items, monthly progress reports, work progress monitoring, budget monitoring, coordination and communication.Twelve (12) Monthly Project Delivery Team (PDT) meetings will be held with City staff and other representatives, as necessary,to discuss work progress,decisions made,schedule and considerations for the City. The Dokken Project Manager will work closely with the City Project Manager and continuously inform the City Project Manager of all project activities. The duration of the project management effort is expected to be continuous through completion of the job. Project management will include: leading, directing and monitoring the Dokken team; preparing for, attending,and documenting team meetings and action items;preparing,coordinating,and maintaining a critical path method schedule; preparing monthly progress reports, invoices and specific work completed; and miscellaneous coordination and support. The Dokken team will document key project decisions, assumptions, and action items in a centralized tracking system to ensure continuity throughout the project lifecycle and to support audit readiness for federally funded projects. Coordination—Close contact will be maintained between the Dokken Project Manager, all subconsultants, the City Project Manager, project personnel, and regulatory agencies.The Dokken Project Manager will act as the principal liaison between the City and staff at Dokken. Project coordination will include support for Federal-aid process compliance, including assistance with tracking key authorization milestones (e.g., E-76 requests), documentation requirements, and coordination of information necessary for Local Assistance approvals. Subconsultant coordination will include scope alignment, schedule integration, review of deliverables, and verification of consistency with overall project objectives and regulatory requirements. The Dokken Project Manager will coordinate internal quality control reviews across all disciplines to ensure consistency, completeness, and adherence to project standards prior to submittal. Communication — Effective communication through in-person visits, focused meetings, telephone calls and a-mails to the City will be performed to discuss specific project issues by the Project Manager. Regular communication with team members, the City and other agency personnel will be facilitated through the Dokken Project Manager. Progress reports will be submitted monthly to the City.These reports will include the work performed during that period, a discussion of issues/decisions, recommendations to address issues, budget status, and anticipated work for the following month. The progress report will be submitted with the monthly invoice. Dokken's Project Manager is responsible for maintaining cost control for each task, including our subconsultants. Project Schedule-Dokken will provide and maintain a detailed Milestone Schedule for the bridge and a less detailed program wide Microsoft Project Schedule. The Milestone Schedule is a simple one page schedule to assist in project communication Dokken's Project Manager will closely monitor the schedules and discuss updates with the City Project Manager. Task 1.1 Deliverables:Monthly Progress Report and Invoice;Meeting Agendas and Minutes;Action Item Lists;RFA and HBP Funding Support Information;Project Schedule TASK 1.2 RECORDS RESEARCH Dokken Engineering will research all information pertinent to the project such as existing field conditions, as-built plans and record drawings right-of-way and parcel data, and all future improvement plans adjacent to or affecting the project site. Dokken Engineering will identify all existing and proposed facilities within the project limits and potential conflicts. TASK 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Task 1.3.1 Preliminary Environmental Study(PES) Dokken will prepare a draft PES Form and will coordinate with Caltrans to setup a field review prior to approval of the PES Forms.The PES Form will include an environmental study area map as well as an environmental constraints analysis to identify key environmental impacts that could occur during construction. Once the draft PES Form is completed, it will be reviewed ��0NRi)E N 23 - 320 8/4/2®"1 ENGINEERING Scope of Services4i� Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A by the City and Caltrans. The PES form will outline the recommended federal environmental documentation, technical studies,surveys,approvals,agency coordination,and permits required for the Project. Task 1.3.1 Deliverables:Preliminary Environmental Study TASK 1.3.2 Field Investigations and Hazardous Material Surveys Geocon and Dokken will assess each of the eight bridge locations(the sites)within the City. TASK 1.3.2.1 Phase I Initial Site Assessment(ISA) Dokken will perform an Initial Site Assessment (ISA)will be to determine the potential presence of environmental concerns and contaminated properties at the sites that may impact maintenance at each location. The primary purpose of the ISA is to assess the sites for the potential presence of recognized environmental conditions(RECs) (i.e., levels of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products warranting regulatory cleanup action) and the uses and conditions at properties and facilities in the site vicinities with the potential to cause(or have caused)an REC at the sites. For the purposes of this ISA,the "vicinity" of the sites is defined as properties/facilities within 1 8 mile of the sites.The ISA will be performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) Designation E 1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process. Potential environmental concerns and contaminated properties that are determined to potentially pose a significant impact to the planned improvements would be further evaluated during a subsequent(Phase II) Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI). As part of the Phase I ISA, Dokken will perform the following services including: • Perform a reconnaissance of the sites to assess for the presence,or make visual observations of indicators of the potential presence, of RECs on the sites.These indicators may include 55-gallon drums,underground and aboveground storage tanks,chemical containers, waste storage and disposal areas,industrial facilities,discolored surficial soils,electrical transformers that may contain polychlorinated biphenyls,and areas conspicuously absent of vegetation.If access is unavailable to any portions of the sites,our ability to complete the assessment described herein may be hindered. Assessment of the sites for wetlands, asbestos-containing building materials, lead- containing paint, lead in drinking water, radon, methane gas,and naturally occurring substances such as arsenic and asbestos are not included in the ISA services. • Perform a visual survey of adjoining and adjacent properties from the sites and from public thoroughfares to observe general types of land use and conditions surrounding the sites. • Review the Standard Environmental Records Sources: Federal and State as referenced in ASTM Designation E 1527-21 to obtain information regarding the potential presence of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products on the sites or on properties within the approximate minimum search distance specified for each source,reviewing reasonably ascertainable regulatory agency files for the sites and documented hazardous substance and/or petroleum product release locations near the sites.The sources for these files could include the local department of environmental health, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. • Review pertinent and reasonably ascertainable information sources to evaluate physiographic,geologic,and hydrogeologic conditions in the vicinity of the sites. • Review and interpret reasonably ascertainable historical aerial photographs to obtain information concerning the historical use of the sites and adjacent properties. • Review historical United States Geological Survey topographic maps to obtain information relative to the topography of the sites, as well as previous development and uses of the sites and properties located in the vicinity of the sites. • Review documents provided by the Client.Potentially useful documents may include geotechnical,geologic,and environmental reports, site plans,plot plans,and correspondence with regulatory agencies. • Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the ISA for the sites and qualitatively describing existing,or the potential for,RECs on the sites. TASK 1.3.2.2 Phase II Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI)Report This work is NOT included in this scope. Task 1.3.3 Natural Environmental Study(Minimal Impacts) A Dokken biologist will conduct fieldwork in order to assess the presence/absence of sensitive biological resources (e.g., species or habitats), or to determine the potential for occurrence of such resources. A literature search will be conducted. The location of any sensitive biological resources in the study area, including plants and plant communities, will be mapped. Surveys will be timed for the appropriate season,e.g. plant surveys during the blooming season. A Natural Environment Study(Minimal Impacts)(NES(MI))in the current Caltrans format will be prepared.The field methods will be described along with the field survey and literature search results. Plant and animal species observed will be listed, along with a general description of vegetative communities. Sensitive resources found will be mapped and evaluated in the NES(MI).The report will contain tables describing sensitive species and their habitats that are present or potentially present; ]DONNE N 23 - 321 8/4/2@"2 E N G I N E E R I N G Scope of Services4i� Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A it will identify and assess project impacts on the existing biological resources, including any sensitive species. Mitigation measures will be included as necessary. Task 1.3.3 Deliverables:Natural Environment Study(Minimal Impacts) Task 1.3.4 Cultural Resources/Section 106 Compliance BPMP activities are oftentimes considered a "screened undertaking" and may be exempt from the Caltrans Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act(NHPA)compliance process. Task 1.3.4.1 Section 106 Compliance—Screened Undertaking Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans to determine if the proposed project activities qualify for a screened undertaking,which many involve some preliminary research, including a records search through the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), Native American consultation, and a pedestrian survey. This task assumes that no cultural resources that require recordation and evaluation for the National Register of Historic Places will be identified within the APE. Although the project may qualify for a CEQA exemption which does not require CEQA Native American consultation,should the City request it,Dokken can assist with the preparation of Project Notification Letters,per California Public Resources Code (PRC) §21080.3.1 (also referred to as AB S2). Dokken can assist the City with subsequent Native American consultation meetings, requests,and recommendations conducted under both Section 106 of the NHPA and PRC§21080.3.1(AB 52). Task 1.3.4.1 Deliverables:Historic Property Survey/Archaeological Survey Report Task 1.3.4.2 Section 106 Compliance—Full Report(OPTIONAL) Should Caltrans not agree that the project qualifies as a screened undertaking, Dokken will conduct Section 106 of the NHPA cultural resource identification efforts.These efforts include delineation of an Area of Potential Effects(APE),Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search, CHRIS records search, historical research, Native American consultation, a pedestrian survey,and preliminary assessment of buried site potential within the APE.The results of the identification efforts will be documented in an Archaeological Survey Report(ASR)and Historic Property Survey Report(HPSR). Task 1.3.4.2 Deliverables:Record Search, Native American Consultation Log Task 1.3.5 Section 4(f)/Section 6(f) Documentation Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans and the City to verify that the project meets the definition of"temporary occupancy" for the purposes of completing the Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) documentation. Because the bridges are elevated over the parks and trails, except the W MacArthur Blvd bridge, the maintenance work does not conflict with the use of the parks or trails.A de minimis level of documentation is not anticipated.A letter report or memorandum will be prepared to document the findings and concurrence on the temporary occupancy finding will be requested from the official with jurisdiction over the parks and trails. Task 1.3.5 Deliverables:Section 4(f)and Section 6(f)Documentation Task 1.3.6 Water Quality Assessment Memorandum Dokken will prepare a Water Quality Assessment Report to address the potential for project impacts on water quality based on current Caltrans guidelines (Environmental Handbook Volume 1, Chapter 9, Water Quality). The report will discuss the waters within the project areas and the receiving waters conditions, objectives, and beneficial uses as well as Caltrans standard best management practices (BMPs) and project design features required in accordance with the current Caltrans Statewide Storm Water Management Plan.This scope and fee assumes that a full Water Quality Assessment Report will not be required by Caltrans. Task 1.3.6 Deliverables: Water Quality Assessment Memorandum Task 1.3.7 CEQA Notice of Exemption(NOE) Form and Evaluation Letter; NEPA Categorical Exclusion Based on identified type of maintenance work identified in the BPMP Plan and preliminary research, the proposed project qualifies for CEQA categorical exemption 15301 for existing facilities. Dokken Engineering will prepare a letter that evaluates whether there are any exceptions that would preclude the use of the CEQA exemption. If no exceptions exist,a CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE)for will be prepared for the City to file NOE. Dokken will file the NOE with the State Clearinghouse.This scope and fee include the$50.00 filing fee. Dokken will work with Caltrans Local Assistance to prepare a Categorical Exclusion as the NEPA approval document for the project and will include avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures provided in the technical studies prepared. Task 1.3.7 Deliverables:Notice of Exemption(NOE)Form and Recommendation Letter TASK 1.4 REGULATORY PERMITS Rff]DO NE N 23 - 322 8/4/2@"3 E N G I N E E R I N G Scope of Services4i� Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A TASK 1.4.1 Section 401 Waste Water Discharge Permit Below deck work is needed for spall repair; however, such maintenance work of existing, serviceable structures is typically exempt from Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting. Non-exempt work may be authorized under the Regional General Permit(RGP) Number 100 issued to the Orange County Flood Control Division by the Corps of Engineers.Coverage under the RGP requires the filing of a Notice of Intent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for a Waste Water Discharge Permit and is included in this scope.The Orange County Public Works also has a Streambed Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that authorizes OCPW to conduct routine maintenance, and it is assumed a Verification Request Form is necessary to submit to CDFW. Dokken will prepare the Verification Request Form or applications and pay associated permit fees. Dokken will submit the forms or applications directly to the agency,or to the City as required. Dokken will prepare and submit applications for encroachment permits for Orange County Flood Control District(OCFCD)or other regulatory agencies,and pay associated permit fees. Dokken will submit the forms or applications directly to the agency, or to the City as required. Task 1.4.1 Deliverables:RWQCB Notice of Intent and Waste Water Discharge Permit,OCFCD Encroachment Permit TASK 1.5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TASK 1.5.1 Preliminary Design Concept Dokken will organize a kick-off meeting with the City staff to discuss the conceptual design plan, project goals and objectives, potential elements and issues, schedule, review of existing information,and conduction of a site investigation. The BPMP Plan includes eight(8) bridges where bridge preventive maintenance is to be performed. Dokken Engineering will field verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided 2020 BPMP Plan.Along with the field review and record research, Dokken Engineering will identify any other maintenance work necessary on the listed bridges to bring them to current conformance with the Caltrans inspection criteria and standards. Based on the results and recommendations from the field review and records research,maintenance activities may get added or removed. The scope of this project will be based off the provided, listed maintenance activities. Activities may be added to or removed from the scope as authorized. TASK 1.5.2 BRIDGE DECK TESTING Two bridges(BR#55C0055-Main Street at Santiago Creek Channel and BR#55C0423-171h Street at Santa Ana River Channel) have been identified in the inspection reports and BPMP Plan to core the bridge deck and test for chloride content. This investigative work will be included in the scope of this task to determine recommendations based on chloride contents found. The recommendations for work activities may be added and included in the PS&E package as performed in Task 2 of this scope. For the 1973 Main Street bridge deck,twelve(12)4-inch-diameter cores,spaced at roughly one location per 1,300 ft2 will be extracted, and immediately reinstated with rapid-setting patch material to restore traffic by morning. Each core will be sectioned into two depth intervals (O—%in. and %-1%in.) and transferred to an AASHTO-accredited laboratory for ASTM C1152 acid-soluble chloride testing. A California-licensed professional engineer will analyze the chloride-versus-depth data and prepare a signed memorandum projecting remaining time to corrosion initiation and recommending appropriate preservation measures. For the 17th Street bridge, a structure flagged for more advanced distress, Optime will first complete a 100%delamination sounding and ground-penetrating-radar survey to delineate subsurface delamination and thickness variations across the 32,936 ft2 deck.Twenty(20)4-inch cores(about one per 1,650 ft2)will then be extracted, rapidly patched,and forwarded to the laboratory.All cores will be tested for chloride content in two discrete depth increments, and four strategically selected samples (two from a highly distressed zone and two from a sound zone) will undergo detailed petrographic examination in accordance with ASTM C856 to assess micro-cracking, aggregate quality, and air-void parameters. Findings from the nondestructive survey and laboratory analyses will be integrated into a PE-sealed report that includes a georeferenced deck-condition map and a decision matrix comparing methacrylate sealing,thin overlay,or partial-depth repair as the most cost-effective rehabilitation strategy. The Dokken Team will plan and implement traffic control measures necessary to safely perform field investigations,including coordination with appropriate agencies for lane closures, encroachment permit requirements, and preparation of traffic handling strategies consistent with MUTCD and local standards.Traffic control efforts will be tailored to minimize disruption to the traveling public while maintaining safe working conditions for field personnel. Task 1.5.2 Deliverables:Two(2)digital Bridge Deck Chloride Test Reports RffD ONNE N 23 - 323 8/4/2®"4 E N G I N E E R I N G Scope of Services4i� Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A TASK 1.5.3 PHOTO DOCUMENTED BRIDGE ASSESSMENT There may be additional distress or damage discovered outside of those identified in the Bridge Inspection Reports. Work activities to repair, or to prevent damage from perpetuating further in the future, may be recommended and qualify to include in the project work activities. For the eight bridges identified in the BPMP plan, Dokken will take photos to document locations where there is existing damage, or where future damage can be mitigated. Dokken will prepare comprehensive photo-documented memorandum with itemized cost estimates detailing recommended bridge preventive maintenance work for each bridge. Dokken will assist the City to submit Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) Forms 6A and 6D to request the anticipated funding to accommodate the additional work. Task 1.5.3 Deliverables:One(1)digital Bridge Assessment Memorandum TASK 1.6 SURVEY Based on the BPMP plan and bridge inspection reports, the identified work recommendations are limited to structure maintenance activities. Available parcel data indicates work is to be performed within City, Orange County Flood Control District, County, or Caltrans Right-of-Way; therefore no boundary surveys for temporary construction easements are anticipated. TASK 1.7 WATER QUALITY Based on the BPMP plan,the work activities identified are limited to structure maintenance.There are no anticipated changes to either the structure,channel,or impervious areas within the project footprint to warrant hydrology or hydraulics analysis. Dokken will assist the City to complete the internal WQMP/SWPP determination form to determine that the project does not trigger LID or WQMP requirements. Dokken will identify best management practices for implementation in project plans and specifications. TASK 1.8 PUBLIC OUTREACH Dokken will assist the City in preparing for and attending a public meeting at the outset of final design to provide a project update to the public and interested stakeholders. Notices would be prepared and sent to all stakeholders and exhibits would be developed to facilitate discussion regarding project details. TASK 1.9 UTILITY COORDINATION Based on the work being performed, utility relocations are not expected. It is anticipated that Relocation Claim Letter to Owners(Letter#2)and liability determination will not be necessary. Utility Base Mapping Dokken will prepare a letter request for as-builts and facility mapping form each of the utility companies,for the City's review and approval. Dokken will perform a field review of the project site to ascertain existing conditions compared to the as-built drawings. Using available record drawings, information from the field reconnaissance and utility mark outs, Dokken will prepare a utility base map in CAD format identifying the existing utilities. Utilities will be shown on the project plans where applicable. Utility Impact Identification and No Conflicts Letter Dokken Engineering will review the project improvements against the existing utility base mapping and identify potential utility impacts. Dokken will develop an inventory of potential utility impacts, confirm utility rights with City records, and prepare Utility Notice to Owners—No Conflict(Letter#3)for distribution to pertinent utility companies, if needed. Task 1.9 Deliverables:Utility Mapping Requests(Letter#1);Existing Utility Base Map; Utility Notice to Owners—No Conflict (Letter#3) TASK 1.10 30%PLANS SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE(PS&E) Dokken Engineering will develop schematic plans, which shall include civil design, structural design, draft technical specifications outline and "opinion of estimated cost".Work activities will include those verified on the provided BPMP Plan List, as well as any additional recommended activities from the project research as agreed upon with the City. The PS&E package assumes the eight bridges will be included in a single delivery. For the two bridges receiving deck testing (BR# 55C0055- Main Street at Santiago Creek Channel and BR#55C0423 - 171" Street at Santa Ana River Channel), it is assumed that results of testing leads to work recommendations of methacrylate treatment. The 30% phase will incorporate recommendations from Project Research to define work activities and project limits. The plans will be prepared based off existing records and as-builts.Any additional work that is not part of the current project scope and the City wishes to include into the project will be discussed during this stage of the project. 30%Plans and Opinion of Probable Cost I11D0NRilE N 23 - 324 8/4/2@"5 ENG IN E E R I N G Scope of Services4i� Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A Obtain and review all relevant as-built plans and the most recent Caltrans bridge inspection reports to create the preliminary plans of the bridge repairs.Quantities and cost estimates will be prepared for all structures. Task 1.10 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans;One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost;One(1)digital copy of Draft Technical Specifications Outline TASK 2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS(60%,90%,and 100%PS&E) Dokken will integrate Cost Estimates, utility mapping, encroachment permits, and easements as applicable. Dokken will coordinate submittals with the City,Caltrans,and any other stakeholder Agency.Burne Engineering will support and perform a portion the bridge preventive maintenance work tasked herein. The Dokken Team will provide bridge preventive maintenance work,traffic handling, signing/striping and coordination. Plan and specification submittals shall be provided in digital format to the City. Hard copy plan sets may be provided upon request. Digital files shall be in Portable Document Format(PDF)and AutoCAD 2023 format.Technical Specifications will be prepared using the Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Special Provisions(latest versions)as a basis, modified for FHWA requirements and submitted along with plans at 60%, 90%and 100%. The PS&E package assumes the eight bridges will be included in a single delivery. For the two bridges receiving deck testing (BR# 55C0055 - Main Street at Santiago Creek Channel and BR# 55C0423 - 17th Street at Santa Ana River Channel), it is assumed that results of testing leads to work recommendations of methacrylate treatment. A formal Quality Control(QC)review will be performed by Dokken and Burne Engineering at each submittal phase.The review will address construction drawings,technical specifications, cost estimates,and overall constructability of the project. Traffic,Signing and Striping Dokken will not design permanent striping, pavement markings, or signing plans. It is assumed that as-builts, or plans provided by the City,will be utilized and referenced to restripe to the existing configuration. A Caltrans Encroachment Permit will be obtained for BR#55C-0055,where signing and signing or traffic handling encroaches into Caltrans Right-of-Way. Dokken will design traffic control plans for this bridge only and assumes the contractor will be responsible for traffic control plans for the other bridges. Task 2.1 60%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) Upon approval of 30% PS&E by the City and Caltrans and upon receiving environmental clearance (both NEPA and CEQA), The Dokken team will prepare and submit the draft 60%plans,specifications, and estimate to the City. 60%Plans Upon approval of the work limits defined in the 30% project phase, work will begin on the 60% plans. The plans will incorporate any comments received from the City from the 30%submittal review and will incorporate all construction details including signing/striping and traffic handling necessary to complete BPMP work. The plans will show utilities based on research and utility mapping.A full set of plans will be prepared with consideration for constructability and public safety. Although not anticipated, if any ancillary structures design is needed, it shall be in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Eighth Edition) with California Amendments current at time of bridge design, Caltrans Bridge Design Details Manual, Caltrans Bridge Design Aids, Caltrans Bridge Memos to Designers, Structure Technical Policies, and Bridge Design Memos, Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC), Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications (latest version), and City CAD Standards.The bridge design work will be performed in English units of measure. 60%Opinion of Probable Cost The Dokken Team will provide cost estimates at the 60% PS&E design submittal. Detailed quantities will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans Standard Specifications (latest version) and payment items. The engineer's estimate of probable construction cost ("Marginal Estimate") for the project will be prepared using the most recent and relevant Caltrans Cost Data,Consultants cost data, as well as the City's cost data. 60%Contract Specifications and Special Provisions The Dokken Team will prepare the contract Technical Provisions for the project based in general on Caltrans Standard Special Provisions (latest version) as a basis and modified for FHWA requirements, Caltrans Standard Specifications (latest version), and City construction contract standards. Task 2.1 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans and Specifications; One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; Two (2)Caltrans Encroachment Permit applications;One(1)digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. Task 2.2 90%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) ��0NRi)E N 23 - 325 8/4/2®"6 ENGINEERING Scope of Services4i� Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program RFP No.25-081A At the 90%level,a thorough review of the plans,work limits,details and specifications is performed for clarity,capacity,City standards, and constructability issues. When the review is complete, the designers will address all comments from the internal and City reviews of the PS&E package.After plan corrections,the designer will review the corrected details to ensure all comments have been addressed. The Dokken Team will proceed with the preparation of the 90% submittal. Plan sheets included in the 60% submittal will receive additional annotation, descriptions, and notes identified per the City's review and the independent check. The submittal will include written responses to all comments received on the prior submittal. Task 2.2 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plans and Specifications,One(1)digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost,• Two (2) Final Caltrans Encroachment Permit applications, One (1) digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. Task 2.3 100%Design-Plans,Specifications,and Estimate(PS&E) At the 100% level,the QC focus will be to confirm prior review comments have been adequately addressed and review any new information added since the 90%submittal.A mark-up of the plans, special provisions and item list will be provided to the Project Manager. After review comments are received from the 90% Bridge PS&E, The Dokken Team will revise the plans and coordinate the necessary changes to the specifications and estimate.Written responses to the City and Caltrans comments will be prepared and provided with the 100%submittal. Task 2.3 Deliverables:One(1)digital copy of Plan and specifications,one(1)digital set of 100%Bidding Documents;one(1) digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost,• One(1)digital copy of Design Calculations if applicable; One (1) digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package. TASK 3 BID ADVERTISEMENT,CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION,RECORD DRAWINGS Task 3.1 Bid Advertisement Bidding procedures will be the responsibility of the City. While the PS&E construction package is advertising for bids, all questions concerning the intent shall be referred to the City for resolution. In the event that any item requiring interpretation in the drawings or specifications is discovered during the bidding period,said items shall be analyzed by Dokken for decision by the City. Dokken shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification,or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Dokken shall attend pre-bid meeting, if scheduled. Task 3.2 Construction Administration Dokken shall provide support to the City during the Construction Administration phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, and/or reviewing submittals. Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required to support the construction contract. Dokken shall complete shop drawings reviews within two(2)weeks of receipt.Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two(2)working days of receipt.Dokken shall be available as requested by the City to resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Dokken shall bring to the attention of the City any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which Dokken may observe. Dokken shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City,or to deputize another to do so. Task 3.3 Record Drawings/As-Builts Upon construction completion, the City will submit field-marked prints to Dokken. Dokken shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations,signature, and submit to the City. low"FRPIDOWNE N 23 - 326 8/4/2®"7 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBIT B City Council 23 — 327 8/4/2026 y z N EXHIBIT 5 AOZ — FF a " F SO ID - O ry o °pV F o° O �F�VF 0. �y64 Fzo oo" m Fs �!uyaay�eluawuo�!nu3 0 auueld Ieluawuoa!eug ueld leluawuoeuu3 ale!aossd � Z aauuold Iwuawuoa!nud ao!uas �auueld led!,uud aa9eueW leAuawuua!nuy - Z � Z.�anueld leluamuo.ynug.�oryas z /pea7leluanmo.nnud yZ .alu!'I.Haf Y� a-u—a/Utl7 Utl7—uas 711-07 VT VT Z aaau!Auy luels!ssv z-aw,9u3 ale!aossv Z aaau!Aud ao!uas Z�aae!ae3 we!aossv/vea1 aawaH ..dd'saleloW ela!ayey Z--5.d ale!aossv/nea,,c—p-, N edd"we4$��!uun7 ueBaW �abeueW 7a/vlt sdd'uew,fooN anals a5eey7 u!led!uu!ad sdd'!aeueoy salaey7 �aEeuely pafo.�d - ,dd'.�a!awxoH[auyeN Qy Y Y C F F F F U Z� J W o z E E i ¢ 'L' m E ° _ e � y w L u ❑` 'S O � 4 AYLU M LJ�A z F F �w Imo\ ity Council 23 — 328 8/4/2026 y z N EXHIBIT 5 N 0 [6+ 6 C7 N N A O z � E � a " F zEF a F zF2 � z Fey - m F" '¢z 020 Fx J1 u—ryyaay ButUe;d c� a �uc�aryyaay 2.!,J-4 PT c� �ryyaay OtltlJ�S C �aa m3ug;ue;s�sstl p�ceS,fN ssna auang�ao� F yo O� yF 2 C O O p� 6� O o F 2 �aauBu3�o�uas F Q F ;u eJ�nsuo� so;sa9stl PaYP�a� 0 Z C (Afd);ueynsua� wso;sagstl payp�a� ;qjepads sio ls�o�oeg Peload u�so�oa�ao�aas •L Q S m C > Z_ 3 O O O Z.O 1 W F F z Az �w Imo\ ity Council 23 — 329 8/4/2026 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT 5 29 DOKKEN BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Effective through December 31,2028 Professional and supporting staff services will be billed at the following hourly billing rates: CLASSIFICATION BILLING RATE THROUGH 12/31/28 PROJECT Principal in Charge $315.00 MANAGEMENT QA/QC Manager $315.00 Project Manager $265.00 DESIGN Senior Engineer 3 $315.00 Senior Engineer 2 $285.00 Senior Engineer 1 $255.00 Associate Engineer 3 $225.00 Associate Engineer 2 $205.00 Associate Engineer 1 $185.00 Assistant Engineer 3 $175.00 Assistant Engineer 2 $165.00 Assistant Engineer 1 $145.00 Senior CAD $255.00 CAD/Detailer $165.00 Engineering Technician $135.00 ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Manager $300.00 PLANNING Principal Planner $275.00 Senior Environmental Planner 2 $215.00 Senior Environmental Planner 1 $195.00 Associate Environmental Planner $155.00 Environmental Planner $125.00 Environmental Technician $105.00 RIGHT OF WAY Right of Way Manager $255.00 Senior Right of Way Agent/Specialist $215.00 Right of Way Agent/Specialist $125.00 Right of Way Assistant $105.00 Right of Way Technician $90.00 Senior Appraiser $195.00 Appraiser $145.00 Appraiser Assistant $105.00 Appraiser Technician $90.00 PUBLIC OUTREACH Community Engagement Director $195.00 Technical Editor $145.00 Graphic Designer $125.00 REIMBURSABLES: Ordinary supplies and equipment are included in the above hourly rates. The following are considered project-specific items and will be billed at their actual cost. Title Reports/Appraisal Reviews Outside Reproduction Permit Fees/Public Notice Advertisements Traffic Control Postage for Public Notice Advertisements Utility Potholing Record Search Fees/Mapping Fees Room and Equipment Rentals City COLIWl lue Ravine Road, Suite 200,Folsom,CA9563(?4V3 3j@: 916.858.0642•Fax: 916.858.06564/2026 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBT C INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. MINIMUM SCOPE OF INSURANCE Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal&advertising injury with limits no less than$2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location(ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09)or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2.Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto(Code 1),or if Contractor has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9), with limit no less than$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the Contractor's profession, with limit no less than S1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. If the contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above,the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the contractor. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain,the following provisions: Additional Insured Status The City,its officers, officials,employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor's insurance(at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 1185 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used). Primary Coverage For any claims related to this contract,the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 0104 13 as respects the City,its officers,officials, employees,and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Notice of Cancellation City Council 23 — 331 8/4/2026 EXHIBIT 5 Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. Waiver of Subrogation Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. Self-Insured Retentions Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M.Best's rating of no less than A:VII,unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Claims Made Policies If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage: 1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2.Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five(5)years after completion of the contract of work. 3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed,and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five(5) years after completion of work. Verification of Coverage Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause.All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications,at any time. Special Risks or Circumstances City reserves the right to modify these requirements,including limits,based on the nature of the risk,prior experience,insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. City Council 23 — 332 8/4/2026