HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/23/2006ACTION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
JANUARY 23, 2006
CALLED TO ORDER: 5:35 P.M.
CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
22 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
SANTA ANA
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
Victoria Betancourt
Don Cribb
Harvey De La Torre
James Gartner
Christopher Leo, Vice Chairman
Tom Lutz
Rigoberto Rodriguez
STAFF PRESENT:
Jay Trevino, Ex. Dir., Plan. & Bldg. Agency
Ben Kaufman, Chief Assistant City Attorney
Karen Haluza, Principal Planner
Martha Ramirez, Recording Secretary
Pledge of Allegiance To The Flag: Vice Chairman Leo
CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar.
MOTION: Betancourt
VOTE: AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
SECOND: Lutz
Betancourt, Cribb,
Rodriguez (7)
None (0)
None (0)
None (0)
De La Torre, Gartner, Leo, Lutz,
A. MINUTES
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 9, 2006.
Commissioner Rodriguez abstained from the Minutes of January 9, 2006.
B. RECORDING SECRETARY REPORT
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the January 9, 2006 Agenda for the Regular Meeting
was posted on the door of the City Hall Council Chambers at 22 Civic Center
Plaza on January 6, 2006 at 8:12 a.m.
RECOMMENDATION:
Instruct the Commission Secretary to enter posting into the minutes.
Planning Commission Minutes 1 January 23, 2006
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-30
Filed by Baja Fresh Mexican Grill requesting a Type 41 Alcoholic Beverage Control
license for on-sale beer and wine at an existing restaurant in the Community
Commercial (C1) zoning district at 2210 East Seventeenth Street.
RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm the Zoning Administrator's action approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-
30 as conditioned.
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-31
Filed by Baja Fresh Mexican Grill requesting a Type 41 Alcoholic Beverage Control
license for on-sale beer and wine at an existing restaurant in the Single Family
Residence (R1) zoning district at 3941 South Bristol Street, Suite I.
RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm the Zoning Administrator's action approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-
31 as conditioned.
E. MINOR EXCEPTION NO. 2005-10
Filed by Rosemary Palacios to allow 10-foot building separation between primary
structure in the Two-Family Residence (R2) zoning district at 609 East Flora Street/2323
South Halladay Street.
RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm the Zoning Administrator's action approving Minor Exception No. 2005-10 as
conditioned.
* * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
BUSINESS CALENDAR
F. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATION DISCLOSURE (REGARDING
AGENDIZED PROJECTS)
No comments were made.
G. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
RECOMMENDATION:
(a) Elect Chairperson of the Planning Commission for the year 2006
(b) Elect Vice Chairperson of the Planning Commission for the year 2006
(c) Appoint a Planning Commission representative to the Historic Resources
Commission for the year 2006
Commissioner Leo was elected Chairperson effective February 13, 2006.
Commissioner De La Torre was elected Vice Chairperson effective February 13,
2006.
Commissioner Lutz was appointed Planning Commission representative to the
Historic Resources Commission effective February 3, 2006.
Planning Commission Minutes 2 January 23, 2006
WORK STUDY SESSION
H ADAPTIVE REUSE -1600 NORTH BROADWAY
Karen Haluza and Jay Trevino provided an introduction that outlined the
concepts of adaptive re-use and explained that tonight's discussion would speak
generally about how buildings once constructed for other purposes, such as
offices, could successfully be converted to other uses, such as mixed-use
residential, as well as presenting a "case study" for discussion of the building
located at 1600 N. Broadway.
The Commission discussed the appropriateness of the case study building, 1600
N. Broadway, as a candidate for residential adaptive re-use, as well as the
concept of adaptive re-use in general in other areas of the City. Comments on
the 1600 N. Broadway building expressed the Commission's cautious approach
to converting buildings to residential uses in areas that have quality of life
challenges to be overcome. The existing multi-family projects in the area, some
of which have deteriorated conditions, the lack of strong pedestrian-oriented
amenities, such as neighborhood-serving retail and other destinations, and the
lack of on-site amenities within the building itself, were seen as potentially limiting
factors in the long-term success of the residential adaptive re-use of the case
study building. In general, the Commission commented that adaptive re-use
projects should reach a higher standard than may even be applied to new
construction rather than a less stringent standard. Projects such as the
Steadfast "Cordoba" project were offered as examples of the minimum high-
quality standard that should be achieved. Specific comments were made about
the need to ensure that older buildings be re-wired to accommodate high-speed
Internet access.
The Commission expressed the need to be flexible in the consideration of
proposals for adaptive re-use for the case-study building, but added that the
timing of such a proposal could be very significant. For example, the completion
of the 1 Broadway Plaza office tower could dramatically alter the surrounding
environment making the location more conducive to residential adaptive re-use in
the future. The Commission expressed that it may be necessary in the interim
period to re-tenant the building with another office use or leave vacant if
necessary.
In the City as a whole the Commission thought it was important that specific
goals and objectives be established for any larger adaptive re-use program and
that strategic locations be identified and potentially, specific districts created
where the amenities (walkable environment, coffee shops, specialty grocery
stores) needed to create a neighborhood with an excellent quality of life, and that
could support adaptive re-use, were provided for. The Commission emphasized
the need and nearby amenities and recreation opportunities as key elements in
the success of any future adaptive re-use strategies.
PROCEDURAL RULES
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-33
Filed by Fairhaven Memorial Park to consider the expansion to the approximately
eight-acre property located north of Fairhaven Avenue and east of Cambridge
Street. The proposed expansion would include the development of new
mausoleum buildings, a new pavilion building, new internment sites, a new
sidewalk on the south side of Fairhaven Avenue and extensive landscaping in
the General Agricultural (A1) zoning district at 1701 East Fairhaven Avenue.
PUBLISHED IN THE ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER: January 13, 2006
PUBLICLY NOTICED:. January 13, 2006
Planning Commission Minutes 3 January 23, 2006
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2005-28.
2. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-33 as
conditioned.
Karen Haluza presented the staff report and recommendation.
The Commission expressed concerns with the quality of the mausoleum
architecture, the seeming incongruity of the semi-private mausoleums and
pavilion building architecture with the community mausoleum, the quality of the
building materials and that they lack the sense of permanence such a structure
demands and that materials such as real stone would provide. The Commission
requested more detail on the community mausoleum windows. The plans were
not clear as to whether the windows were faux or real, if spandrel glass is
proposed for some of the windows, if the windows could be more successfully
replaced by niches or decorative ironwork. The Commission also requested
more detail about how the interior of the community mausoleum would work and
what the other elevations would look like.
The Commission discussed the need for a signal, or other form of protected
pedestrian crossing, between the existing southern cemetery and the proposed
northern expansion. The applicant, Ms. Marla Noel, explained how the cemetery
currently provides for uniformed traffic control officers to assist pedestrians in
crossing the street during services. Taig Higgins, of the Public Works Agency,
addressed the Commission's questions regarding the safety and effectiveness of
a signal so close to the existing signal at Cambridge and Fairhaven. The
Commission directed staff to work with the applicant to answer these questions,
work to improve the building materials and architecture and provide further
details.
The public hearing was opened.
Mike Martin voiced concern with length of construction period, traffic impacts,
hours of operation for new addition, landscape for existing Cypress trees,
economic impact for neighborhood, and rodent pest control during construction.
Applicant Marla Noel spoke in support of the project.
The public hearing was closed.
MOTION:
1. Continue the public hearing to February 13, 2006.
2. Recommendation to change Planning Condition No. 13 that affects
the hours of operation for construction to start at 8:00 a.m. and
Condition No.14 that affects the operation of construction equipment
starting at 8:00 a.m. on Saturday.
3. Direct staff to address Commission concerns regarding: traffic
signal on Cambridge, liability to City, window designs, material
selections, mausoleum architecture, landscape to the north, and
underground utilities.
MOTION: Lutz SECOND: Leo
VOTE: AYES: Betancourt, Cribb, De La Torre, Gartner, Leo, Lutz,
Rodriguez (7)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: None (0)
2. Public Comments (for items not on the agenda)
No comments were made.
Planning Commission Minutes 4 January 23, 2006
STAFF AND COMMISSION COMMENTS
3. Staff Comments
Mr. Trevino congratulated appointees for the 2006 Planning Commission. He
updated the Commission on the 17t"/Tustin Streets annexation, State nuances,
and indicated that potential usage for the vacant lot would be a Rite-Aid drug
store and a Chuck E Cheese restaurant. He stated that the County Planning
Commission was slated to review the project.
4. Planning Commission Comments
Commissioner De La Torre
• Recommended a study session on principles of good urban environments
that would define key elements to be considered by the Planning
Commission.
Commissioner Cribb
• Commented on notable high concentration of shopping carts at 17t"/Grand
Streets.
• Recommended a study session regarding the potential for residential
development on North Broadway, north of 17t" Street.
• Commented on consultant selection for the Downtown Santa Ana
Renaissance Plan. Mr. Trevino indicated the final selection was of high
caliber.
• Requested an update on status of proposed condo conversions for
apartments at Cabrillo/17t" Streets. Ms. Haluza provided information.
Commissioner Betancourt
• Modified comments on the Minutes of January 9 regarding the "green"
building concepts and the LEED rating system.
Commissioner Gartner
• Appreciated staff's efforts with tonight's presentations.
Commissioner Lutz
• Commented on the 17t"/Tustin annexation with regard to potential retail
applications.
Vice Chairman Leo
• Commented on recent court ruling regarding regulation of cell towers
aesthetics.
• Inquired about the historical significance of the "temperature building" on
Main Street. Mr. Trevino provided information.
• Inquired about status of project at corner of Ross/Civic Center. Staff
indicated that construction will start soon.
• Requested an update on the YMCA building at Civic Center. Mr. Trevino
provided information about the Claremont Club's (private for profit
organization) proposal for the property.
• Commented on the light synchronization on southbound Main Street/
eastbound Town & Country with entrance to SR22 that creates backup
traffic.
• Thanked Commission for elected position to Chairperson.
5. Excuse of Absences
6. Adjournment 7:57 P.M.
Martha Ramirez
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes 5 January 23, 2006