HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-17~ ,
~.
• RESOLUTION NO. 2007-017
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING
NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT REVIEW NO. 2005-02
TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
RESIDENTIAL ADDITION AT 709 SOUTH BIRCH
STREET LOCATED IN THE SPECIFIC
DEVELOPMENT 40 ZONE (SD-40) (HENINGER
PARK)
KO - 3/21 /07
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby
finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. The property owner is requesting approval of Neighborhood Project
Review No. 2005-02 to allow the construction of a residential
addition at 709 South Birch Street, which is located within the
Specific Development 40 Zone (SD-40) (Heninger Park).
B. The property owner is proposing to construct a 940 square foot
addition at the rear of the existing single-family residence. The
addition has been designed to be consistent with the existing
Craftsman Bungalow architectural style of the home. The exterior
elements of the addition will also match the existing finishes of the
residence, including wood siding, wood single-hung windows, wood
window trim, consistent roof pitch and exposed rafter tails.
C. The Heninger Park Review Committee has reviewed the proposed
construction and recommends approval of the project.
D. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-593.5(c) requires the
Planning Commission to review all plans within a Specific
Development Plan area to ensure that the project is in conformity
with the approved Specific Development.
E. On March 26, 2007, the Planning Commission conducted the
necessary review pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section
41-593.5(c).
F. After considering all of the evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission finds and determines that Neighborhood Project
• Review No. 2005-02 is consistent with the Heninger Park
Resolution No. 2007-017
Page 1 of 3
~-
• is
• Architectural Design Guidelines and complies with the Heninger
Park zoning provisions.
G. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the
proposed project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section
15301. This Class 1 exemption allows additions to existing structures
that do not exceed 10,000 square feet. Categorical Exemption
Environmental Review No. 07-36 will be filed for this project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby approves Neighborhood
Project Review No. 2005-02. This decision is based upon, but is not limited to:
the Request for Planning Commission Action dated March 26, 2007 and exhibits
attached thereto, and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein
by this reference.
ADOPTED this 26th day of March, 2007 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Alderete, Betancourt, De La Torre, Gartner, Leo,
Mill, Munoz (7)
NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSENT: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0)
n
Christop r Leo
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By:
Kylee O. o
Assistant City Attorney
Resolution No. 2007-017
Page 2 of 3
• CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and
certify the attached Resolution No. 2007-017 to be the original resolution adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on March 26, 2007.
Date: ~!' z~-6
Planning Commis ion Sec t ry
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2007-017
Page 3 of 3
PROOF OF SERVICE
• (C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and
not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza,
Ross Annex 2nd ,Santa Ana, California 92702.
I served the foregoing document described as: Resolution No. 2007-017
(Neighborhood P~ro~ect Review No. 2005-02) in this action y p acing a true
copy t ereo enc o1 sed m sea e enve opes a ressed as follows:
AI Maciel
2017 West Alco Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92703
Rosa Castro
709 South Birch Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
[ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the
addressee(s).
[X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited
with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at
Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date
or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in
affidavit.
[ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as
complete and without error.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on Apri124, 2007 at Santa Ana, California.
MA THA RAMIREZ