HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-01RESOLUTION NO. 2007-01
KO -1 /3/07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SITE PLAN
REVIEW NO. 2004-05 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW
MODIFICATION TO THE COMMERCIAL PLAZA FOR THE
PROPERTY AT 2775 NORTH MAIN STREET WHICH IS
WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 59 (SD-59)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. The Applicant is requesting approval of amendment to Site Plan Review
No. 2004-05 to allow modifications to the commercial component plaza
design for the property located at 2775 North Main Street which is within
Specific Development No. 59 (SD-59).
B. Section 41-593.5(c) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a review by
• the Planning Commission of all plans within a specific development plan
area to ensure the project is in conformity with the Specific Plan.
C. Applicant proposes to replace the amphitheater design with a more
flexible plaza design allowing a more efficient programmable space.
D. The amendment to Site Plan Review No. 2004-05 came before the
Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on August 14, 2006. The
Planning Commission continued the plaza modification request to allow the
applicant an opportunity to respond to several questions. Those items
included: a better delineation of space; operationally, the use and non-use of
the entertainment space; spillover noise; renderings portraying events and
non-events; and a list of events.
E. On January 8, 2007 the amendment to Site Plan Review No. 2004-05
came back before the Planning Commission.
F. The site plan review amendment is in compliance with the provisions of
Specific Development No. 59 (SD-59) zoning district
G. In accordance with the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality
Act, the proposed art and plaza plans has been determined to have no
significant impact to Environmental Impact Report 2004-01 that was
• certified.
Resolution No. 2007-01
Page 1 of 5
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby amends
Site Plan Review No. 2004-05 as conditioned in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated as though fully set forth herein.
This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing,
which includes but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated
August 21, 2006 and exhibits attached thereto; and January 8, 2007 and exhibits
attached thereto; and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this
reference.
ADOPTED this 8t" day of January, 2007 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Betancourt, Cribb, De La Torre, Leo, Lutz (5)
NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSENT: Commissioners: Gartner (1)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0)
C
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
Kylee O. tto
Assistant'~ity Attorney
/~i~
Christop r Leo
Chairma
Resolution No. 2007-01
Page 2 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify
the attached Resolution No. 2007-01 to be the original resolution adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on January 8, 007.
Date: lam' p~
Planning Commission Secre
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2007-01
Page 3 of 5
c-
Conditions of Approval for Site Plan Review No. 2004-05
Site Plan Review No. 2004-05 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal
Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Building
Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the following
conditions of approval:
The applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below rip or to exercising
the rights conferred by this site plan review.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life
of the development project. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in
the revocation of the site plan review approval.
A. Planning Division
The project must remain in compliance with the project's Site Plan Review
comments (DP No. 03-48).
2. Any amendment to this plan must be submitted to the Planning Division
for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is
available or the SD-59 must be amended.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 2007-01
Page 4 of 5
c-
•
PROOF OF SERVICE
(C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and
not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza,
Ross Annex 2"d ,Santa Ana, California 92702.
I served the foregoin document described as: Resolution No. 2007-01
(Site Plan Review No. 200-05] in this action by placing a true copy ereo
enc-IosecTin s^ earec~enve opes a dressed as follows:
William Hammerstein, President
Hammerstein Investments, Inc.
441 North Beverly Drive, Suite 209
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
[ J I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the
addressee(s).
[X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be
• deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully
prepaid at Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware
that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal
cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of
deposit for mailing in affidavit.
[ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as
complete and without error.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on January 24, 2007 at Santa Ana, California.
MARTHA RAMIRE
Resolution No. 2007-01
Page 5 of 5