HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-22RESOLUTION NO. 2006-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING SITE PLAN
REVIEW NO. 2006-04 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
2032 NORTH MAIN STREET WHICH IS WITHIN SPECIFIC
DEVELOPMENT NO. 78 (SD-78)
KO -6/30/06
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. The Applicant is requesting site plan approval to replace tree species in
the courtyard/entrance area for the Bowers Museum Expansion which is
located at 2032 North Main Street which is within Specific Development
No. 78 (SD-78).
B. The Bowers Museum expansion was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on July 25, 2005. At that time, a landscape plan was
presented for the new expansion and the parking lot. A grove of orange
trees was shown in the courtyard/entrance area to represent a cultural
connection to Southern California and the Bowers Museum. The applicant
is requesting to replace the Orange trees with the Naked Coral tree,
E hrina coralloides.
C. Section 41-593.5(c) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a review by
the Planning Commission of all plans within a specific development plan
area to ensure the project is in conformity with the Specific Plan.
D. Site Plan Review No. 2006-04 came before the Planning Commission of
the City of Santa Ana on August 21, 2006.
E. The project is in compliance with all applicable development standards
outlined within the Specific Development Plan (SD-78).
F. In accordance with the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality
Act, the proposed change out of trees for this project has been determined
to have no significant impact to the mitigated negative declaration that was
prepared as Environmental Review No. 2005-45.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby
approves Site Plan Review No. 2006-04. This decision is based upon the evidence
submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes but is not limited to: the Request for
Resolution No. 2006-022
Page 1 of 3
C.
Planning Commission Action dated August 14, 2006 and exhibits attached thereto; and
the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 2006 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Benavides, Cribb, De La Torre, Gartner, Leo, Lutz
(6)
NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSENT: Commissioners: Betancourt (1)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0)
Christo er Leo
Chairman
•
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
'._-
By:
Kylee O. Ott
Assistant Ci y Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify
the attached Resolution No. 2006-022 to be the original resolution adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on August 14, 2006.
Date: ~'~-4 ~
tanning Commission retary
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2006-022
Page 2 of 3
i
PROOF OF SERVICE
(C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE
I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and
not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza,
Ross Annex 2"d ,Santa Ana, California 92702.
On August 31, 2006 I served the foregoing document described as:
~tion No. 2006-022 (Site Plan Review No. 2006-04~ in this action by
a true copy t ereo enc ose in sea e enve opes a ressed as follows:
John I. Grace
Development Manager
Lutzky Associates Development, LP
2915 Redhill Avenue, Suite C 104
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
[ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the
addressee(s).
[X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited
with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at
Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date
or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in
affidavit.
[ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as
complete and without error.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on August 31, 2006 at Santa Ana, California.
MARTHA RAMI