The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006-11• RESOLUTION NO. 2006-011 KO - 5/12/06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT REVIEW NO. 2006-09 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL ADDITION AT 823 SOUTH PARTON STREET LOCATED IN THE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT 40 ZONE (SD-40) (HENINGER PARK) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The property owner is requesting approval of Neighborhood Project Review No. 2006-09 to allow the construction of a residential addition at 823 South Parton Street, which is located within the Specific Development 40 Zone (SD-40) (Heninger Park). • 1. The property owner is proposing to construct a 486 square foot addition at the rear of the existing single-family residence. 2. The addition has been designed to be consistent with the existing Colonial Revival architecture style of the home. The exterior elements of the addition will match finishes of the existing residence, including the wood siding, single-hung wood windows, and roof pitch B. The Heninger Park Review Committee has reviewed the proposed construction and recommends approval of the project. C. On May 22, 2006, Planning Commission the Planning Commission conduced the necessary review pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-593.5(c). D. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-593.5(c) requires the Planning Commission to review all plans within a Specific Development Plan area to ensure that the project is in conformity with the approved Specific Development. E. After considering all of the evidence submitted, the Planning Commission finds and determines that Neighborhood Project Resolution No. 2006-011 Page 1 of 3 Review No. 2006-09 project is consistent with the Heninger Park • Architectural Design Guidelines and complies with the Heninger Park zoning provisions. F. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is exempt from further review per section 15301(e)(1), as the addition does not exceed 2,500 square feet. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 06-51 will be filed for this project. Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby approves Neighborhood Project Review No. 2006-09. This decision is based upon but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated May 22, 2006 and exhibits attached thereto, and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 2006 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Betancourt, Cribb, De La Torre, Gartner, Leo, Lutz, Rodriguez(7) NOES: Commissioners: None (0) ABSENT: Commissioners: None (0) • ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0) ~~ , Christo er Leo Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: ~ Kylee O. O Assistant ity Attorney • Resolution No. 2006-011 Page 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006-011 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on May 22, 2006. Date: ~ ~~ ~ Planning Commissi ecretary City of Santa Ana • • Resolution No. 2006-011 Page 3 of 3 • PROOF OF SERVICE (C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex 2nd ,Santa Ana, California 92702. I served the foregoing document described as: Resolution No. 2006-011 (Neighborhood Proiect Review No. 2006-09) in this action y p acing a true copy t ereo enc o~ secTm sea e enve opes a ressed as follows: Eberardo Paz Zamudio 823 South Parton Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 [ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the addressee(s). [X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and • processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. [ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as complete and without error. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 13, 2006 at Santa Ana, California. RAMIRE • .. PROOF OF SERVICE (C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex 2"d ,Santa Ana, California 92702. I served the foregoing document described as: Resolution No. 2006-011 (Neighborhood Proiect Review No. 2006-09) in this action y p acing a true copy t ereo en'~e~c m sea e enve opes a ressed as follows: Leticia Portocarrero 520 South Arapaho Drive Santa Ana, CA 92704 [ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the addressee(s). [X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. [ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as complete and without error. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 13, 2006 at Santa Ana, California. l MART MIRE