HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-09RESOLUTION NO.2006-09
~~,
KO -6/8/06
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING SITE PLAN
REVIEW NO. 2006-02 AS CONDITIONED FOR THE
GROUND LEVEL DESIGN OF THE ONE BROADWAY
PLAZA OFFICE TOWER WHICH IS WITHIN SPECIFIC
DEVELOPMENT NO. 75 (SD-75)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. The Applicant is requesting approval of the ground level design of the One
Broadway plaza office tower which is within Specific Development No. 75
(SD-75) zoning district.
B. Section 41-593.5(c) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a review by
the Planning Commission of all plans within a specific development plan
area to ensure the project is in conformity with the Specific Plan.
C. Site Plan Review No. 2006-02 came before the Planning Commission of
the City of Santa Ana on April 24, 2006.
D. The project is in compliance with all applicable development standards
outlined within the Specific Development Plan (SD-75).
E. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project has been determined to be adequately evaluated in previously
prepared Environmental Impact Report No. 1999-01.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby
approves the ground level of the One Broadway plaza office tower (Site Plan Review No.
2006-02) as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. The
Planning Commission site plan approval is limited to the ground level of the One
Broadway plaza office tower, and does not include any other portions of the project
such as the landscaping, the plazas or the treatment of the intersection of 10t" and
Sycamore.
ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 2006 by the following vote:
Resolution No. 2006-09
Page 1 of 4
AYES: Commissioners: Betancourt, Cribb, De La Torre, Gartner, Leo,
• Lutz(6)
~ NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSENT: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: Rodriguez (1)
Christop er Leo
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By:
Kylee O. O
Assistant City Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify
the attached Resolution No.2006-09 to be the original resolution adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on April 24, 2006.
Date:~~~ ~~
Planni ommission Secretary
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2006-
Page 2 of 4
Conditions for Aaaroval for Site Plan Review No. 2006-02
• Site Plan Review No. 2006-02 is approved subject to compliance, to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the
Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire
Code, the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable regulations.
The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior
to exercising the rights conferred by this site plan review.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below
throughout the life of the site plan review. Failure to comply with each and every
condition may result in the revocation of the site plan review.
A. Planning Division
The project shall remain in compliance with Site Plan Review No.
2006-02.
2. The project shall incorporate atwo-story, recessed circular building
lobby. The walls shall consist of clear tempered glass to allow
visibility into the lobby.
3. An entry canopy shall be provided over each building entry. The
canopies shall consist of prefinished metal with clear laminate glass
on the front edge of each canopy. The canopies shall be a
minimum dimension of 22 feet in width by 20 feet in length.
4. The ground level building design shall include architecturally
enhanced building columns. The columns shall be approximately
three feet by three feet in size and shall be finished with prefinished
metal to match the entry canopies.
EXHIBIT A
•
Resolution No. 2006-09
Page 3 of 4
..
PROOF OF SERVICE
• (C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
t am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of
eighteen and not a party to the within action; my business address is 20
Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex 2nd Floor, Santa Ana, California 92702.
On April 10, 2007 served the foregoing document described as:
Resolution No. 2006-09 (Site Plan Review No. 2006-02) in this action by
placing a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as
follows:
Michael Harrah
Caribou Industries
1200 North Main Street, Suite 900
Santa Ana, CA 92701
[ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office
• of the addressee(s).
[X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection
and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would
be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage
thereon fully prepaid at Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of
business. 1 am aware that on motion of the party served, service is
presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more
than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
[ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was
reported as complete and without error.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 10, 2007 at Santa Ana, California.
r
MARTHA RAMIREZ v~ LJ
•
Resolution No. 2006-09
Page 4 of 4