HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-03KO - 1 /20/05
• RESOLUTION NO. 2005-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 2004-33 TO ALLOW A 60-FOOT HIGH
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY AT 3308 WEST
WARNER AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 came before the Planning
Commission of the City of Santa Ana for a duly noticed public hearing on
January 10, 2005.
B. Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 has been filed with the City of Santa
• Ana seeking to allow a 60-foot high wireless communication facility at
3308 West Warner Avenue.
C. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-198.10, a Conditional
Use Permit is required for major wireless facilities.
D. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning
Commission to grant a conditional use permit upon making certain
findings.
1. Will the proposed use provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or
community?
The proposed 60-foot tall cellular facility at 3308 Warner
Avenue will provide enhanced service for customers of
Cingular Wireless in the southwest portion of Santa Ana.
Additionally, the monopole will aid in reducing the gaps in
cellular service to its users especially for those users
traveling on Warner Avenue, a major arterial, and in the
surrounding industrial areas.
2. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular
• case be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of
persons residing or working in the vicinity?
Resolution No. 2005-03
Page 1 of 3
• Federal law exempts local jurisdictions from regulating
health related issues as these issues are covered under
Federal laws. The proposed facility will be in compliance
with both the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety
regulations.
3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic
stability or future economic development of properties surrounding
the area?
The proposed monopole will be compatible with the
surrounding area and will not adversely affect the economic
viability in the area as the monopole has a stealth design
that will maintain the appearance of a light standard. In
addition, due to its location at the rear of an industrial
building and proposed reduction in overall height, it is not
expected to create any adverse economic impacts for the
surrounding properties.
4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in Chapter 41 for such use?
• The cellular facility has been designed to be in compliance
with the regulations and conditions identified in Chapter 41
for a major wireless facility.
5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any
specific plan of the City?
The proposed monopole will not adversely affect the General
Plan as cellular facilities, designed to be compatible with the
surrounding environment, are consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Industrial (IND) General Plan designation.
2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, Section 15301), the recommendation is exempt
from further review. This Class 31 exemption allows for minor alterations to
existing facilities. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 03-96 will
be filed for this project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission after conducting the public hearing hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at
the abovesaid hearing, which includes but not is not limited to: the Request for Planning
Commission Action dated January 10, 2005 and exhibits attached thereto; and the
• public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
Resolution No. 2005-03
Page 2 of 3
~J
ADOPTED this 10th day of January, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: De La Torre, Leo, Lutz, Mondo, Nalle (5)
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners:
Cribb (1)
None (0)
None (0)
Glen Mondo
Chair erson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By: ~..
• Kylee O. to
Assistant ity Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Martha Ramirez, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the
attached Resolution No. 2005-03 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Santa Ana on January 10, 2005.
Date: ~ ~~ 0
~` Plan ing Commission Secre
City of Santa Ana
•
Resolution No. 2005-03
Page 3 of 3
• Conditions for Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33
Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana
Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform
Building Code and all other applicable regulations.
The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below rior to
exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the
life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may
result in the revocation of the conditional use permit.
A. Plannin4 Division
1. The applicant must comply with all conditions and requirements from the
Development Review Committee for the development project (DP No. 03-
24).
2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the
Planning Division for review. At this time, staff will determine if
• administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit must be
amended.
3. The permit applicant recognizes that the frequencies used by the cellular
facility located at 3308 West Warner Avenue are extremely close to the
frequencies used by the City of Santa Ana for Public Safety. This
proximity will require extraordinary "comprehensive advanced planning
and frequency coordination" engineering measures to prevent
interference, especially in the choice of frequencies and radio ancillary
hardware. This is encouraged in the "Best Practices Guide" published by
the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International,
Incorporated (APCO), and as endorsed by the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC). Prior to the issuance of any permits to install the
facility, (Permit Applicant) shall meet in good faith to coordinate the use of
frequencies and equipment with the Communications Division of the
Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department to minimize, to the greatest
extent possible, any interference with the Public Safety 800 MHz
Countywide Coordinated Communications System (CCCS). Similar
consideration shall be given to any other existing or proposed wireless
communications facility that may be located on the subject property.
4. At all times, the permit applicant shall not prevent City of Santa Ana from
• having adequate spectrum capacity on City's 800 MHz radio frequency.
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1 of 2
• 5. Before activating its facility, the permit applicant will submit to a post-
installation test to confirm that "advanced planning and frequency
coordination" of the facility was successful in not interfering with the City of
Santa Ana Public Safety radio equipment. This test will be conducted by
the Communications Division of the Orange County Sheriff-Coroner
Department or a Division-approved contractor at the expense of the
Applicant. This post-installation testing process shall be repeated for
every proposed frequency addition and/or change to confirm the intent of
the "frequency planning" process has been met.
6. The permit applicant shall provide a 24-hour phone number to which
interference problems may be reported. This condition will also apply to
all existing facilities in the City of Santa Ana.
7. The permit applicant will provide a "single point of contact" in its
Engineering and Maintenance Departments to insure continuity on all
interference issues. The name, telephone number, fax number and a-mail
address of that person shall be provided to City's designated
representative upon activation of the facility.
8. The permit applicant shall insure that lessee or other user(s) shall comply
with the terms and conditions of this permit, and shall be responsible for
• the failure of any lessee or other users under the control of permit
applicant to comply.
9. The permit applicant shall provide a coverage and cell site location map
for each facility proposed.
•
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 2