Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout31A - CUP - 3835 WEST FIRST STREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2010 TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-21 TO ALLOW A SUBWAY RESTAURANT AT 3835 WEST FIRST STREET, UNIT D-1 - GREWAL FOODS, APPLICANT btu CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ? As Recommended ? As Amended ? Ordinance on 15f Reading ? Ordinance on 2nd Reading ? Implementing Resolution ? Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Receive and file the staff report approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 as conditioned. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION On November 8, 2010, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 as conditioned by a vote of 5:0 (Gartner and Walters absent) to allow a Subway Restaurant at 3835 West First Street, Unit D-1 within the North Harbor Specific Plan (SP- 2) zoning district. The Planning Commission made no changes to the recommended conditions of approval outlined in the attached staff report (Exhibit A). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Ja . Trevino Executive Director Planning & Building Agency VF:rb viVeports\cup10-21 Subway= Exhibit: A. Planning Commission Staff Report 31A-1 REQUEST FOR Planning Commission Action PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 2010 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - FILED BY WILL FESLER FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-21 TO ALLOW A SUBWAY RESTAURANT AT 3835 WEST FIRST STREET, UNIT D-1 Prepared by Vince Fregoso PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY APPROVED ? As Recommended ? As Amended ? Set Public Hearing For DENIED ? Applicants Request ? Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO -- ? 0 4, J"el? Executive Director Planning Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 as conditioned. DISCUSSION Request of Applicant Mr. Will Fesler, representing Grewal Foods, is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a Subway Restaurant to occupy a vacant space at 3835 West First Street, Unit D-1. Specifically, the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to operate a restaurant within the North Harbor Specific Plan (SP-2) zoning district. Property Description The subject site is an 8.2 acre, square shaped parcel of land located at the northwest comer of First Street and Harbor Boulevard. The site currently contains approximately 109,021 square feet of retail and restaurant uses within six separate buildings. A total of 502 parking stalls are provided on the property. The site has a current zoning designation of North Harbor Specific Plan/General Commercial (SP- 2/GC) and a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC). Surrounding land uses include commercial and residential to the north, and commercial to the south, east and west (Exhibits 1 and 2). Proiect Description Subway is proposing to operate a new sandwich shop within a vacant, 1,020 square foot tenant space located within an existing building. Subway is intending to make modifications to the tenant space to facilitate their restaurant design. Improvements will primarily consist of interior partitions to create a new kitchen, restrooms and a seating area to accommodate seating for approximately 16 patrons (Exhibit 3). 1 0101 A -'9 Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 November 8, 2010 Page 2 The restaurant, which is planning a late spring/early summer 2011 opening, will be open for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Operating hours for the restaurant will be from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. seven days per week. Analysis of the Issues The applicant is proposing to remodel and reoccupy a vacant tenant space as a restaurant use within the General Commercial district of the North Harbor Specific Plan. Section 3.5.2 of the Specific Plan requires a conditional use permit for restaurants and other eating establishments. The intent of the conditional use permit is to ensure that uses comply with the general concepts and policies of the North Harbor Specific Plan. The proposed restaurant use is consistent with the concepts and policies of the Specific Plan. First, the restaurant is consistent with Goal Two of the plan, which promotes uses that enhance and support the residential uses surrounding Harbor Boulevard. The Subway restaurant will further this goal by providing another food option in the corridor, thereby assisting in promoting a variety of neighborhood serving activities along the corridor. Second, the project is consistent with Goal Five, which supports the enhancement of the economic viability of the Harbor Boulevard area. The restaurant will further this goal as it will occupy a vacant space within a major commercial center, thereby identifying this center as a viable and successful economic center. One of the findings that must be made when considering a recommendation of approval for a conditional use permit of this type is whether the proposed use would, in any way, be detrimental to the surrounding area. To this end, staff has included several conditions of approval in order to ensure that the project provides an asset to the center and the neighborhoods it serves. Standard conditions such as graffiti removal, increased lighting, and maintaining visibility into the restaurant will assist in reducing Police related calls for service. In addition, staff is proposing a condition of approval that clarifies the use of signage for the business to ensure that such signage does not create a safety hazard for the public, as well as to prevent the potential for visual blight due to excessive signage. This condition is specific to the use of so-called "human signs" and will be described in more details as follows. Article XI of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) contains standards regulating on-premise signs. There are provisions within this portion of the code that prohibit signs that may be dangerous or confusing to motorists; that may impede the safe and efficient flow of traffic; that project into the public right-of-way; that incorporate movement; and that are A-frame, sandwich board or are another portable, temporary advertising display. These standards are meant to both ensure the public's safety, as well as to ensure that excessive signage does not create a visual blight in the city. 31A-3 Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 November 8, 2010 Page 3 It is clearly the intent of a "human sign," to draw attention to the advertised business from the public right-of-way. In most cases this involves a person holding a large placard and incorporating movement into the display of the sign in order to draw motorists' attention. In some cases, the sign holder swings the sign into the roadway or otherwise blocks the sidewalk, creating an unsafe condition for both the sign holder and members of the public. As such, this type of signage is prohibited under the provisions of signs that are confusing to motorists and that may impact traffic safety. It is recommended that such signs be prohibited. Based upon the analysis of the project and the project's compatibility with the City's General Plan and applicable development standards, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 as conditioned. CEQA Compliance This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15301. This Class 1 exemption applies to a project that involves the operation and licensing of an existing structure with little or no expansion involved. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2010-114 will be filed for this project. Vince Frego o, AI Principal Planner VF:jm vflreportslcup10-21 Subway. 11-8-10.pc 31A-4 R1 2kRI _ SPd S2i R2 R2 SP- R2 R2 g?g?((((I 2 1 Rl xx 1 HAZAfa AV _ - _ _ _ _ Rl SD-53 1 - - I I 1 ? 11R2.P?1 II I I I R1 O R1 zo - Ii :I==I & R SP- R2 R2 S2 r R, i 2 Rl SP II I 11 II II I? 1 2 1rM R1 R1 II I I_l1_Il _I?_I / II R4-PRD 9 r1r-1^r-1?1 Iti II I II II II I+ I i Mwta*a ar r SP-2 SP-2 SP-2 51H 5T PSP2 $P3 SP-2 2 R2 R1 2 y -// 0 Al R2 SD I + S Rt j pRD i I Rl JR1. 2 i 11 -_ ii ___ 1 \ R2 Ml R2 Rl III -+LII I I , I I 1 _ R2 R2 R2 R2jR2 R21 ail , R1-PRD 2 I \+ 11 I 0.1 Al ii1 , 1 RD C2 1 C2A @ PRD C2 SP-2 5P-2 Sp.? sP. C5 C7£ C2 R li='I 1 L.?w ! SP-2 R2 sAa 2;`i. C2 ` 1--- I Ml SD-32 I n SD-49"i -?\ / ii - _- M, PROJECT 1\v,==_?---? - ?JE ;Rl I1511L il R2 Rz j° R2 // R211 II so-34 SP. -------R2 R3 `i2 R2 R2 ; 0 II ISP_2 --_-- R2 _R2 R2 R2 R1 R2 \-_=1\---1 Ir-Ir -Ir -Ir-Ir -1r-I; $P- R2 R2 C R2 ww I ll _-? II II 11 II II II : Al 1 Rl rmvII Al Il ___?l __? II +I II II II II 11 2 T-- R2 wnwrswv 1 i' ???w? h SP 2 SP-2 Al R2; / ?? L__II 0 R2 R2 a I ``-:. II Al al Al Al R1 _ . - ?--- `---1r 3 RI - -a1CFADCHJ AV 7 R1 R1 p i c S13-2 SP-2 RI R1 R1 R7 R7 R7 R1 R1 5 fl R11 RI Rl Al (EJOWAGRWLTUR4L GS\A 8DUTHMAINSRREET00MMUUALCISR7CT FO PANNED DeVELOWENT -B AkWNGMCDIFICATICN .F FLOORAIEARkM PFD PANNED FESDENTIALWAICIMENT C COMMLAITYOWNIUCAL GC WANNMENTCENTER RI SIN(I-FAMILYFUSIDBdCE 01-M0 COMMUNITYOCMMEMAL-MUSEUM DISrHGr M1 LIGHTINOUSTRAL RZ 1V10 FAMILY FEXENCE C2 GENEFAL OOMM840AL M2 HEAVYINDLORAL RS MULTIPLEFAMILY Rsomm Cl C84TPAL BUSINESS MO MILTTAWOPGdVICNS Fri SIBUfBN4AP14KMENT C3•A CFN7FAL EIISNESSARRSB MLLACE 0 OPEN SL4CE SE FESDENTIALESTATE C4 PANNED 940FflNIG CENTER -0Z 0M37AYZCNE SD S"FS RcQp,fiOFMENT C5 ART94ALOOMMBUAL P PFCFEEBCNAL 91 SPEDA F1AN Ot 00MMOUALIE9DENTLAL PCD PLANNED OCMMLINTYDBALCMENT CUP 2010-21 Subway 3835 W. First St., Unit D1 ?--? - - = 500 Fl£T V = io00 F1£r P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y MaNITYMAP DCHIBT 1 E E 0 Residential u Commercial V L E E 0 U Single-Family }`` ECT ? F ROJ Residence . - - y 4 S ITE 1 -- ?t Farket -:, ....?' ?,aiµ .. ... FIRST S i n g l e- F a m i l y Residence Restaurant U n i o n Meeting Hall etail/Restauran /Prof. Services J m tr O M Q ST. CUP 10-21 SUBWAY ?l 3835 West First Street, Unit D1^ P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT 2 31A-6 ssro arq ? I4?? c ?e MOM-. ST1 .iwM "`ly ed• a Ib__N.'? ?_ j 'fit e-1 I t a F @ ® ! N i ? 9 a D?- Ajstjpt, f> 3 gca???€aaaa=q= q f F ~ ( , ; O t m ?i go0 g Pfi Pin ,yaw s_.-, ? Is=o:?u +.°?+?.+•f??: P? IP'.s> I 33 , d CHI .+ ,Ii ED e.iLJ . YD .l•R' yF f?'?a. _: _._ .. ?.. i'],i ? - ? ? ?? C? I?f iz i I YI k III illi II I _ • ? i t ITT 41 I{ i H r • .D - ,z/•? `. d`y•? ?? a M e.Y ...t 4 F =tt I j, ??? r s: d, \ \'? \ . \\\?\\\ \ \ F FT ?k x - I . ?i I F , :+ - ' « .. .. ? .... - • r a ?i6 tl , 1 l Pe j T U(MB IT 3 Aft A cwrvw nw? 19N01? Utlo:iw ,azrurrtroc? 3MHU JIB WE SOOC'? lvM 3Li? k' N Su312ivnctOV3H GIHOM vo r)! o 1143°yV1lfiNdDr3A3o c g to is ii ;t isaN S£K Mme 0 r : LS08h# 31801S ?Dsr,s 2F AS 5 `e • O y N t? Ndiv?Ol 01 336WJNWd ? o F ROH - 11/08/10 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-21 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW A RESTAURANT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3835 WEST FIRST STREET, UNIT D-1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 to operate a restaurant for the property located at 3835 West First Street, Unit D-1. B. The North Harbor Specific Plan (SP-2) section 3.5.2(4) requires a conditional use permit for any restaurant or other eating establishment located in the general commercial zone of the North Harbor Specific Plan (SP-2). C. On October 25, 2010, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21. Upon the motion of the Planning Commission, the hearing was continued to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on November 8, 2010. Thereafter, the Planning Commission held the continued public hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 on November 8, 2010. D. The Planning Commission determines that the following findings, which must be established in order to grant this Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638, have been established: Will the proposed use provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community? The proposed Subway Restaurant will provide a service to the community by providing an additional dining option along the Harbor Boulevard corridor. 2. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity? Resolution No. 2010-18 Page 1 of 5 31A-8 The proposed restaurant will not be detrimental to persons residing and working in the area as the use, as conditioned, will not create any negative or adverse impacts. All business activities will occur within the building, which will reduce the potential for negatively impacting the surrounding businesses and residents. Further, a condition of approval has been added that prohibits "human signs," which affects vehicular traffic and promotes visual blight. 3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area? The project site contains several commercial buildings that are suitable for the proposed project. Numerous restaurants are currently located at and adjacent to the canter. The reoccupation of a vacant tenant space identifies this site as a stable, viable location for businesses to exist. 4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use? The proposed project will be in compliance with all applicable regulations and conditions of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and the North Harbor Specific Plan. 5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any specific plan of the City? The proposed project will not adversely affect the General Plan as restaurants are permitted within the General Commercial (GC) General Plan land use designation. E. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review per Section 15301. This Class 1 exemption allows the licensing of existing facilities with no expansion of the existing use. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2010-114 will be filed for this project. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the public hearing hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 as conditioned in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated October 25, 2010 and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 2010-18 Page 2 of 5 31A-9 ADOPTED this 8th day of November, 2010 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Acosta, Alderete, Yrarrazaval(5) None (0) Gartner, Walters (2) None (0) Betancourt, Turner, NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: Eric Alderete Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Ryan O. Hodge Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Secretary of the Planning Commission, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2010-18 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on November 8. 2010. Date: Secretary of the Planning Commission City of Santa Ana 31 A-10 Resolution No. 2010-18 Page 3 of 5 Conditions for Approval of Conditional Use Permit No 2010-21 Should Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-21 be approved, the project shall comply with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit. A. Planning Division 1. All proposed site improvements must conform with the Site Plan Review approval of DP No. 2010-26. 2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the Planning Division and Police Department for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit must be amended. 3. The use of hand-held portable advertising, i.e. "human signs," shall be prohibited as a means of advertising any business aspect of the conditionally permitted eating establishment both on and off the premises of the subject property identified as 3835 West First Street, Unit D-1. B. Police Department The applicant(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises under control of the licensee. 2. The applicant(s) shall be responsible for maintaining the premises free of graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of occurrence. 3. The existing restaurant and required parking within 60 feet of the building must conform to the provisions of Chapter 8, Article II, Division 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. These code conditions will require that the existing project's lighting, door/window locking devices and addressing be upgraded to current code standards. Light standards cannot be located in required landscape planters. 4. The cash register must be visible from the street at all times and shall not be obstructed at any time by temporary or permanent signage. Resolution No. 2010-18 Page 4 of 5 31 A-11 NOVEMBER 8, 2010 PAGE 2OF2 5. Window displays must be kept to a minimum for maximum visibility and shall not exceed 25 percent of window coverage. 6. Window displays and racks must be kept to a maximum height of three feet including the merchandise. 7. A timed access cash controller or drop safe must be installed. 8. Install a silent armed robbery system. Resolution No. 2010-18 Page 5 of 5 31 A-12