HomeMy WebLinkAboutORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA) (C-9-0826)N-2011-006
8
9
10
1?
'1
1'i
W
2Q
21,
2�!
23
24
2c
Li
O PW40)
crny�ccx
Vlnh Nguyen)
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
BY AND BETWEEN
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
THE CITIES OF ANAHEIM, BREA, COSTA MESA,
FULLERTON, ORANGE, SANTA ANA
AND
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IM111V
THE BRISTOL STREET/STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT
It+
The following Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter, "MOU") is effective this Iy day
Zol I
of P21L 2gA0, entered by and between the Orange County Transportation Authority
(hereinafter, "AUTHORITY"), the City of Anaheim, the City of Brea, City of Costa Mesa, the City of
Fullerton, City of Orange, City of Santa Ana, and the State of California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) (hereinafter referred to as the "AGENCIES" or "AGENCY").
WHEREAS, coordinating and synchronizing traffic signals across cities' boundaries is a major
component in enhancing countywide traffic flow and reducing congestion; and
WHEREAS, AUTHORITY has the responsibility to carry out signal coordination and
synchronization efforts in Orange County; and
WHEREAS, the Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) Project shall consist of traffic corridors that
will span a minimum of two jurisdictions, not require immediate street widening, and have sufficient
traffic volumes to show a measurable benefit of interagency signal synchronization through cooperative
time -based coordination; and
WHEREAS, AUTHORITY and AGENCIES agree to the implementation of the Bristol
Street/State College Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (hereinafter, the "PROJECT") as
Page 1 of 12
L:\Camm\CLERICAL\WORDP ROC\AG REE W G908266RTMOU, docx
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
1 one of the three (3) corridors for Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects for Orange County; and
2 WHEREAS, the PROJECT is nineteen (19) miles in length and will include approximately
ninety-seven (97) traffic signals located from the City of Brea to the City of Costa Mesa, as illustrated in
4 the PROJECT Scope of Work which is attached herein as Exhibit A; and
5 WHEREAS, the PROJECT will also include hardware and software upgrades to traffic
f controllers, traffic telecommunications and inter -tie systems, central traffic master controllers and
i associated systems (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Traffic Control Elements"), and these Traffic
3 Control Elements will be constructed and/or installed and implemented as part of the PROJECT as
identified in the PROJECT Scope of Work; and
10 WHEREAS, AUTHORITY agrees to work with AGENCIES to coordinate the inclusion of other
1 1 Traffic Control Elements to be installed during the construction of the PROJECT that are not included in
12 the PROJECT Scope of Work, and that the owning AGENCY will have responsibility for coordinating
13 and funding the installation of those Traffic Control Elements during the course of the PROJECT; and
14 WHEREAS, AUTHORITY and AGENCIES desire to enter into this MOU to demonstrate their
15 commitment to improving transportation opportunities for Orange County and to develop and implement
16 the Bristol Street/State College Boulevard TSS Project;
17- NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed by AUTHORITY and AGENCIES to
18 enter into the following Memorandum of Understanding with respect to the matters as follows:
1 ARTICLE 1. COMPLETE AGREEMENT:
2Q This MOU, including all exhibits and documents incorporated herein and made applicable by
21: reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions of the MOU
22 between AUTHORITY and AGENCIES concerning the PROJECT and supersedes all prior
23 representations, understandings and communications between the parties. The above -referenced
24 recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein. The invalidity in whole or part of
2`3 any term or condition of this MOU shall not affect the validity of other term(s) or condition(s).
26 /
Page 2 of 12
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
1 ARTICLE 2. RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORITY:
AUTHORITY agrees to the following responsibilities for PROJECT:
3 1. To retain oversight of the PROJECT development and establish PROJECT
4 milestones.
5 2. To interface with the AGENCIES and coordinate outreach for the PROJECT.
6 3. To assist in building consensus among the AGENCIES with respect to the required
7 services for the PROJECT.
r3 4. To collect manual intersection directional movement and automated machine traffic
9 counts, specified in the PROJECT Scope of Work.
10 5. To develop new timing plans optimized for signal synchronization, and provide
11 updated timing plans and turning movements to the AGENCIES in Synchro format upon request.
1?_ 6. To provide on -site support to implement the timing plans as necessary. Timing plans
13 are subject to each AGENCY's review and approval.
144 7. To prepare "before" and "after' studies of the PROJECT conditions. The "before"
15 studies shall be completed by spring 2011, and the "after" studies shall be completed by winter
16 2012.
17 ARTICLE 3. RESPONSIBILITIES OF AGENCIES:
18 AGENCIES agree to the following responsibilities for PROJECT:
19 1. To provide AUTHORITY all current intersection, local field master, and/or central
20 control system timing plans and related data no later than February 1, 2011, and updates on an as-
2;1 needed basis as required by AUTHORITY.
22 2. To provide Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) to the AUTHORITY or its
23 < representative for its use in the construction of infrastructure as needed to implement coordinated
and synchronized systems and operations.
25, 3. To give PROJECT related signal and telecommunications equipment a high
26 maintenance priority during the PROJECT.
Page 3 of 12
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
1 4. To take reasonable steps to keep signal control systems, inter —tie, detection systems
2 and related equipment in proper working order during the PROJECT.
3 5. To maintain and repair their own signal control systems inter —tie, detection systems
4 and related equipment located within each of their respective jurisdiction.
!i 6. To provide on -site support, if needed, for timing plan changes and the construction
6 and/or installation of traffic control elements as specified in the PROJECT Scope of Work.
7. Each AGENCY's Traffic Engineer or authorized designee (which in some cases may
b be the AUTHORITY) shall be authorized to make changes or adjustments to the signal timing plans,
9 when required.
10 8. To perform the changes required at central or field control locations and/or
14 intersection controller assemblies. When AUTHORITY is required to make such changes,
12 AGENCIES shall provide AUTHORITY access to all necessary equipment.
1:3 9. To designate a technical lead person to act as a liaison among the Agencies.
14 ARTICLE 4. MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL PARTIES:
1 AUTHORITY and AGENCIES agrees to the following responsibilities for PROJECT:
16 1. PROJECT signal synchronization efforts shall focus on those time periods specified in
the PROJECT Scope of Work.
1b 2. To attend and participate in all joint agencies related PROJECT meetings.
1a 3. To cooperate and coordinate with all other agencies, their staff, contractors,
20 consultants, and vendors in providing the services and responsibilities required under this MOU to
21 the extent practicable with respect to the performance of the PROJECT.
22 4. The owning AGENCY shall be responsible for coordinating the construction and/or
23 installation of traffic control elements that are not included in the PROJECT Scope of Work.
24 5. To work together in good faith, using reasonable efforts to resolve any unforeseen
2,5 issues and disputes arising out of the performance of this MOU.
26 6. This MOU may only be modified or amended upon written mutual consent of all
Page 4 of 12
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
1 AGENCIES. All modifications, amendments, changes and revisions of this MOU in whole or part,
2 and from time to time, shall be binding upon the agencies, so long as the same shall be in writing
3 and executed by the AGENCIES.
4 7. This MOU shall be governed by all applicable federal, state and local laws. The
5 AGENCIES warrant that in the performance of this MOU, each shall comply with all applicable
6 federal, state and local laws, statutes and ordinances and all lawful orders, rules and regulations
promulgated there under.
8 8. Each AGENCY shall be excused from performing its obligations under this MOU
during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by an unforeseeable cause
1(? beyond its control, including but not limited to: any incidence of fire, flood; acts of God;
1 'I commandeering of material, products, plants or facilities by federal, state or local government;
12 national fuel shortage; or a material act or omission by any other agency; when satisfactory
1: evidence of such cause is presented to the other agencies, and provided further such
14 nonperformance is unforeseeable, beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the
15 agency not performing.
16, 9. Any notice sent by first class mail, postage paid, to the address and addressee, shall
17 be deemed to have been given when in the ordinary course it would be delivered. The
18 representatives of the AGENCIES who are primarily responsible for the administration of this
19 MOU, and to whom notices, demands and communications shall be given are as detailed in
2Q signature section.
21, 10. This MOU shall continue in full force and effect through June 30, 2012, unless
22 terminated earlier by AUTHORITY. The AGENCIES may elect to extend the term of this MOU for an
23 additional six (6) months commencing July 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2012.
24. 11. The term of this MOU may only be extended upon mutual written MOU by all
25 AGENCIES.
26
Page 5 of 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the AGENCIES hereto have caused this MOU
No. C-9-0826 to be executed on the date first above written.
CITY NAHEI
By:
Tom Tait
Mayor
ATTE
By:
I
n a Andal
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
1
Cristina Talley
City Attorney
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
�AUTHORITY
By:� l�A ti - -(
Carolina Coppolo
Manager, Contracts and Procurement
APPROV D AS TO FORM:
By:
Kennard R. Smart, Jr.
General Counsel
Page 6 of 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CITY OF B
By:
Roy M re
May r
ATT T:
B
lucii a Williams
City perk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: y�
Aim Markman
City Attorney
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
Page 7 of 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CITY OF C STA MEAA
,l
By:
Gary onahah
Mayor
ATTEST:
By
Jjpe Folcik
City Clerk
i
APPROV D AS TO F RM.-
By:
Kifnberly H II Barlow
City Attorney
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
Page 8 of 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CITY OF FULLERRTON
By: a G �
F. Richard Jones, M.D.
Mayor
ATTEST: /J ✓%
By:j'C'�> 7—tiC�lic.c/ _
Robert Ferrier
Interim City Clerk
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
Page 9 of 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
Page 10 of 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CITY OF SANTTA ANA/�
By: ��G�c t 6et-y"
Dave Ream
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: µ 2caniz"I u ri
�r City Attorney
ArTEsr.
-7y1~ /) ./-p
MARIA D. HUIZAR
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-0-0826
Page 11 of 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
m
rict Director
and Maintenance
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING C-9-0826
Page 12 of 12
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
Scope of Work 1 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.......................................................................8
1.1
OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND....................................................................8
1.2
PROJECT LIMITS AND DESCRIPTION..........................................................
11
1.2.1
BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR ...............................................
11
1 .2.2
HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR......................................................
13
1.2.3
WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR .........................................
14
1.3
APPROACH TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION DESIGN
FINALIZATION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND SUPPORT SERVICES ................
15
1.4
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION DESIGN FINALIZATION PHASE
REQUIREMENTS............••..............................................................................
16
1.5
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................
19
1.6
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION SUPPORT SERVICES PHASE
REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................
19
1.7
GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES......................................................................
19
1.7.1
AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITIES...................................................................19
1 .7.2
CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES...............................................................20
SECTION 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT..................................................................23
2.1
GENERAL INFORMATION...............................................•.............._...............23
2.2
PROJECT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS................................................23
SECTION 3.0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION DESIGN FINALIZATION
....30
3.1
PART "A" - BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES..............................................................................30
3.1 .1
TASK A-1: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - KICK-OFF MEETING........................................30
3.1 .2 TASK A-2: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED TSS STUDY
ALIGNMENT VERIFICATION..........................................................................30
3.1 .3 TASK A-3: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED DATA COLLECTION.. 31
3.1 .4 TASK A-4: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED INVENTORY OF
EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNALS, FIELD MASTERS/HUBS LOCATIONS,
SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS, AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ...33
Scope of Work 2 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
3.1 .5
TASK A-5: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED BRISTOL/STATE
COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR "BEFORE" STUDY............................................36
3.1 .6
TASK A-6: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - COMPLETED DESIGN PHASE
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW..........................................................................36
3.1 .7
TASK A-7: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION .....................37
3.1 .8
TASK A-8: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS.40
3.2
PART "B" - HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES..............................................................................41
3.2.1
TASK B-1: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - KICK-OFF MEETING........................................41
3.2.2
TASK B-2: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED TSS STUDY
ALIGNMENT VERIFICATION..................•.......................................................42
3.2.3
TASK B-3: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED DATA COLLECTION ..42
3.2.4
TASK B-4: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED INVENTORY OF
EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNALS, FIELD MASTERS/HUBS LOCATIONS,
SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS, AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ...44
3.2.5
TASK B-5: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED HARBOR BOULEVARD
BRT CORRIDOR "BEFORE" STUDY..............................................................47
3.2.6
TASK B-6: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - COMPLETED DESIGN PHASE
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW..........................................................................48
3.2.7
TASK B-7: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION .....................48
3.2.8
TASK B-8: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS.52
3.3
PART "C" - WESTMINSTER/17th STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES..............................................................................53
3.3.1 TASK C-1: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - KICK-OFF MEETING........................................53
3.3.2 TASK C-2: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - REVIEW COMPLETED TSS STUDY
ALIGNMENT VERIFICATION..........................................................................53
Scope of Work 3 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
3.3.3 TASK C-3: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - COMPLETED DATA COLLECTION .................54
3.3.4 TASK C-4: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - COMPLETED INVENTORY OF EXISTING
TRAFFIC SIGNALS, FIELD MASTERS/HUBS LOCATIONS, SIGNAL
COMMUNICATIONS, AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS .................56
3.3.5 TASK C-5: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - COMPLETED WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET
BRT CORRIDOR "BEFORE" STUDY..............................................................58
3.3.6 TASK C-6: WESTMINISTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - COMPLETED DESIGN PHASE
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW..........................................................................59
3.3.7 TASK C-7: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION .....................60
3.3.8 TASK C-8: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS.63
SECTION 4.0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION IMPLEMENTATION ............ 66
4.1 TASK AND DELIVERABLE REQUIREMENTS................................................66
4.2 PART "A" - BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES......................................................................66
4.2.1
TASK A-1 : BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS SERVICES -
SIGNAL TIMING IMPLEMENTATION..............................................................66
4.2.2
TASK A-2: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT................69
4.2.3
TASK A-3: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
SCHEDULING OF WORK................................................................................70
4.2.4
TASK A-4: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
COORDINATION, INSTALLATION MANPOWER, AND INSTALLATION
RESTRICTIONS..............................................................................................70
4.2.5
TASK A-5: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION GUARANTEE
.........................................................................................................................
72
4.2.6
TASK A-6: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - "AFTER STUDY..........................................72
4.2.7
TASK A-7: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT REPORT...................................73
Scope of
Work 4
09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
4.2.8 TASK A-8: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND
MEETINGS.............................................................................................•........75
4.3
PART "B" - HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES......................................................................75
4.3.1
TASK B-1: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - SIGNAL TIMING IMPLEMENTATION .......75
4.3.2
TASK B-2: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT................79
4.3.3
TASK B-3: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES- EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION SCHEDULING
OFWORK........................................................................................................80
4.3.4
TASK B-4: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
COORDINATION, INSTALLATION MANPOWER, AND INSTALLATION
RESTRICTIONS..............................................................................................80
4.3.5
TASK B-5: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION GUARANTEE
.........................................................................................................................
82
4.3.6
TASK B-6: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - "AFTER STUDY..........................................83
4.3.7
TASK B-7: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT REPORT...................................83
4.3.8
TASK B-8: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND
MEETINGS......................................................................................................86
4.4
PART "C" - WESTMINSTER/17th STREET BRT TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES........................................................................................... ............
86
4.4.1
TASK C-1 : WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - SIGNAL TIMING IMPLEMENTATION .......
86
4.4.2
TASK C-2: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT................89
4.4.3
TASK C-3: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION SCHEDULING OF WORK ..........
89
4.4.4
TASK C-4: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
COORDINATION, INSTALLATION MANPOWER, AND INSTALLATION
RESTRICTIONS..............................................................................................90
Scope of
Work 5 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
4.4.5 TASK C-5: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION GUARANTEE
...................................................................................•..................................... 91
4.4.6 TASK C-6: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - "AFTER STUDY"........................................92
4.4.7 TASK C-7: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT REPORT...................................93
4.4.8 TASK C-8: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND
MEETINGS...............................................................•......................................95
SECTION 5.0 SUPPORT SERVICES........................................................................100
5.1
PART "A" - BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS SUPPORT
SERVICES.....................................................................................................
100
5.1 .1
TASK A-1 : BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS SIGNAL
TIMING SUPPORT SERVICES.....................................................................
100
5.2
PART "B" - HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS SUPPORT
SERVICES.....................................................................................................
101
5.2.1
TASK B-1: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS SIGNAL TIMING
SUPPORTSERVICES...................................................................................101
5.3
PART "C" - WESTMINSTER/17lh STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS SUPPORT
SERVICES................................................................................... •.................
101
5.3.1
TASK C-1: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS SIGNAL
TIMING SUPPORT SERVICES.....................................................................101
SECTION 6.0 DELIVERABLES.................................................................................104
6.1
DELIVERABLES REQUIREMENTS..............................................................104
6.1 .1
GENERAL INFORMATION............................................................................
104
6.1 .2
DELIVERABLES FORMAT............................................................................
104
6.2
LIST OF PROJECT DELIVERABLES............................................................
105
SECTION 7.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS..............................................112
7.1
DEFINITIONS.............................................................................•..................112
7.2
ABBREVIATIONS..........................................................................................
118
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
ATTACHMENT A - BRAVO! PROGRAM TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION
CORRIDORS MAP
ATTACHMENT B - SAMPLE DRAFT TIME -SPACE DIAGRAM COMPLETED BY
PREVIOUS CONSULTANT
Scope of Work 6 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 1.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Scope of Work 7 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1 OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND
As a key element of the planned Bravo! Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Program, the
Orange County Transportation Authority (AUTHORITY) seeks traffic engineering
consultant services to finish design, implement, and provide support services for
traffic signal synchronization (TSS) on three corridors within Orange County.
The first corridor shall be along Bristol Street/State College Boulevard (formerly
referred to as the "28-Mile" corridor), the second corridor shall be along Harbor
Boulevard, and the third corridor shall be along Westminster Avenue/17th Street
(Reference Documents - Attachment A). Each corridor is a required
transportation control measure project for the purpose of meeting federal air
quality mandates within the South Coast Air Basin. The implementation on all
three corridors shall be completed by June 2011 to satisfy this requirement.
The TSS component is divided into three major phases as follows:
• TSS Design Finalization Phase,
• TSS Implementation Phase, and
• TSS Support Services Phase
Since January 2008, design efforts for the TSS design phase have been under
development by others. As of January 2010, the TSS design phase is
approximately 80% complete. Completed TSS design phase tasks include:
1. Final TSS Study Alignment Verification Reports,
2. TSS Data Collection and Field Inventory Reviews,
3. TSS "Before" Studies,
4. Draft optimized and synchronized Traffic Signal Timing Plans, and
5. Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plans.
As part of this SOW, CONSULTANT shall complete all remaining TSS design
phase tasks not completed by others. Remaining TSS design phase tasks
include:
• Final optimized and synchronized Traffic Signal Timing Plans, and
• Final Signal Timing Optimization Plans.
Scope of Work 8 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
For the TSS Implementation Phase, CONSULTANT shall furnish and install
traffic signal equipment as defined in the scope of work (SOW) (including, but not
limited to, traffic signal controllers (hardware and software) and GPS clocks).
CONSULTANT shall also verify all recommendations for traffic signal equipment
upgrades that may be necessary for the implementation of the TSS plans.
The TSS Support Services Phase requires CONSULTANT to provide continuing
signal timing support for a period of nine (9) months after the TSS
Implementation Phase. CONSULTANT shall monitor, observe, fine-tune, and
optimize the signal timing and phasing operations of the synchronized signalized
intersections as defined in the SOW.
The overall TSS effort encompasses two hundred and fifty-two (252)
intersections within eleven (11) agency jurisdictions, which include Anaheim,
Brea, Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Orange, Santa
Ana, Seal Beach, Westminster, and Caltrans District 12. Memorandums of
Understanding (MOU) and/or cooperative agreements with each of the eleven
(11) agencies is underway with AUTHORITY and agency staff with expected
completion by winter 2010.
In the future, the three TSS corridors will be updated and maintained within the
AUTHORITY's Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program under the
Renewed Measure M program.
The agencies are currently using different types and models of traffic signal
controller systems as part of their local controller system or master controller
system. The following traffic signal controller systems are currently used along
the corridors:
1. NEMA — Multisonics 820A
2. NEMA - Econolite ASC/2 and ASC/3
3. NEMA -Eagle M52
4. 170, 170E
5. 2070, 2070N, 2070L, 207OLN
Table 1-1 summarizes the traffic signal controller make and type, local
intersection software, and traffic management system software per agency that
optimized signal timing and synchronization shall be implemented at along the
corridors.
Scope of Work 9 09/09/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Table 1-1
Summary of Signalized Intersections Traffic Signal Systems and
Traffic Management Systems Hardware and Software
Controller Make & Type
Local Intersection
Traffic Management System
Software
Software
J
Q
y
C
N
U
M
U
O
C
Agency
N
a
ca
0
y
y
•y
N
C
y
Q
O
O
C
N
C
•C
•C
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
N%
fOq
e^s
N
N
d_—
y:..
Jr—
0
1—A
W
W
CcCO3
CO
d
V
w
N
N
N
W
�+
C.0
V
N
W
W
N
sOra
Gi
Ci
N
Ci
N
s
V
Q
N
=
W
W
I--V
Co�T
O
O
O
O
W
W
2
O
W
N
~
co
N
V
Q'
F—
C7
U
M 1°
0
Z
Z
N
1
Anaheim
J
J
J
J
2
Brea
J
J
J
3
Costa Mesa
J
J
J
4
Fountain Valley
J
J
J
J
5
Fullerton
J
J
J
6
Garden Grove
J
J
J
J
J
7
Orange, City of
J
J
J
J
J
8
Santa Ana
J
J
J
J
9
Seal Beach
J
J
J
101
IVestminster
J
J
J
J
11
Caltra ns
J
J
J
J
J
J
The objective of this TSS project is to improve traffic flow through the synchronization of
signalized intersections along the corridors. This includes additional intersections
beyond the project limits due to short roadway segments along the corridors and/or to
maintain existing synchronized zones. The main goals of the synchronization project
are to optimize signal timings to increase throughput, decrease travel times, reduce
Scope of Work 10 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
overall delay, and comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(AQMD) requirements.
1.2 PROJECT LIMITS AND DESCRIPTION
1.2.1 BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR
Optimized signal timing and synchronization shall be implemented at the
following roadway segments along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor
including additional intersections beyond the corridor limits due to short roadway
segments and/or to maintain existing synchronized zones:
1. Bristol Street from Baker Street to the SR-22 ramps, as well as including
West Memory Lane to The City Drive.
2. The City Drive from West Memory Lane and continuing along State
College Boulevard to Brea Boulevard.
Table 1-2 summarizes the number of signalized intersections per agency along
the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor including additional intersections beyond
the BRT corridor limits.
Scope of Work 11 09/09/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 9-2
Bristol/State College Boulevard BRT Corridor
■�u�r�wc■ v�
v� ■�a���caa ■���c�aca..uv��a
rc� r���c��a�
Arterial'
No. of
Signalized
Intersections
Along BRT
Route
Additional Signalized
Intersections Outside
BRT Roust®',
(Potentially'Coordinated
with Signalized
intersections Along BRT'
Route)
Total No. of
Traffic Signals
Desired to be t
'Coordinated
State College Boulevard
41
7
48
Katella Avenue
2
O
O
City Drive
7
O
7
Metropolitan Drive
O
1
1
Bristol Street
22
11
33
'Newhope Street
0
2
2
' Fairview Road
O
6
6
Sunflower Avenue
5
O
0
Main Street
9
O
O
Von Karman Ave
3
O
0
Michelson Drive
3
O
O
Jamboree Road
2
O
O
Campus Drive
8
O
0
Culver Drive
7
O
O
Irvine Center Drive
2
O
0
Fortune Drive
4
O
O
Iton Parkway
5
O
O
Barranca Parkway
1
O
O
s are curre
Note: Total intersection counts = 123
Overlapping intersection counts: Harbor Boulevard Corridor = 1, Westminster/17th Corridor = 1
The locations of the additional signalized intersections per arterial beyond the
Bristol/State College Boulevard BRT Corridor limits is summarized in Table 4-4 at
the end of Section 4.
Scope of Work 12 09/09/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
1.2.2 HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR
Optimized signal timing and synchronization shall be implemented at the
following roadway segments along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor including
additional intersections beyond the corridor limits due to short roadway segments
and/or to maintain existing synchronized zones:
1. Chapman Avenue from Euclid Street to the SR-57 ramps.
2. Harbor Boulevard from Brea Boulevard to Newport Boulevard.
Table 1-3 summarizes the number of signalized intersections per agency along
the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor including additional intersections beyond the
BRT corridor limits.
Scope of Work 13 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 1-3
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor
rvUMDer oT .>i naiizea
Iniersecilons eer P r
rlal
Arterial
N/5#
Sil}�nalizect,
Inlersactions
Along BliT^
Route
A lti9rna 81gl7allz,d:!11
inter�c�oriis" C?ul+dei
6RT'Routa
(Potentially Coordinated
with 3lgnalized
ntersec+tions along BRT
Route)
' No►#
T:r"afiflc�'SI�na11SA'
as red to. be
Coordinated
State College Boulevard
1
O
0
Nutwood Avenue
2
O
0
Chapman Avenue
8
9
17
Lemon Street
2
O
O
Commonwealth Avenue
2
O
0
Harbor Boulevard
74
6
80
Trask Ave
1
1
1
*Adams Avenue
-
6
6
'Fairview Road
-
3
3
19th Street
1
0
O
Newport Boulevard
2
1
1
Superior Avenue
6
O
0
Hospital Road
1
O
0
Balboa Boulevard
3
O
0
Total
103
26
108
Signalized intersections are currently linked with Harbor Boulevard's coordinated system.
The locations of the additional signalized intersections per arterial beyond the
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor limits is summarized in Table 4-5 at the end of
Section 4.
1 .2.3 WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR
Optimized signal timing and synchronization shall be implemented at the
following roadway segment along the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor
including additional intersections beyond the corridor limits due to short roadway
segments and/or to maintain existing synchronized zones:
1. Westminster/17th Street from Apollo Drive to Santiago Street.
Scope of Work 14 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Table 1-4 summarizes the number of signalized intersections per agency along
the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor including additional intersections
beyond the BRT corridor limits.
Table 1-4
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor
Number of Signalized Intersections Per Arterial
Arterial
No. of I
Additional Signalized
Total No. of
Signalized
Intersections Qutside
Traffic Signals
Intersections
BRT Route
'Desired to be>
Along BRT
(Potentially: Gaordlnatad
`Goorainated ;
Route
yr7lh SlgrtNalizesi
lnters4ctione.A4, BRT
Routh)"
Pacific Coast Highway
2
O
O
Channel Drive
1
O
O
7th Street
5
O
O
Seal Beach Boulevard
4
O
0
Westminster Avenue
29
2
31
Brookhurst Street
0
3
3
17th Street
7
6
13
Flower Street
2
O
O
Civic Center Drive
6
O
O
Santa Ana Boulevard
1
O
O
Total
1 57
1 11
47
Signalized intersections are currently linked with Westminster Avenue/17th Street's coordinated system
Note: Total intersection count = 58
Overlapping intersection counts: Harbor Boulevard Corridor = 1
The locations of the additional signalized intersections per arterial beyond the
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor limits is summarized in Table 4-6 at the end of
Section 4.
1.3 APPROACH TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION DESIGN
FINALIZATION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND SUPPORT SERVICES
AUTHORITY shall issue one contract for TSS design finalization,
implementation, and support services on the three planned BRT corridors.
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the activities specified in the SOW.
The first TSS corridor to be implemented is the Bristol/State College Boulevard
BRT Corridor. This corridor is approximately nineteen (19) miles in length and
Scope of Work 15 09/09/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
has ninety-seven (97) intersections. The cooperating agencies for this corridor
are the cities of Anaheim, Brea, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, Orange, Santa Ana, and
Caltrans District 12.
The second TSS corridor to be implemented is the Harbor Boulevard BRT
Corridor. This corridor is approximately twenty-three (23) miles in length and has
one hundred and eight (108) intersections. The cooperating agencies for this
corridor are the cities of Anaheim, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, Fountain Valley,
Garden Grove, Santa Ana, and Caltrans District 12.
The third TSS corridor to be implemented is the Westminster/17th Street BRT
Corridor. This corridor is approximately fourteen (14) miles in length and has
forty-seven (47) intersections. The cooperating agencies for this corridor are the
cities of Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Westminster, and Caltrans
District 12.
All work performed will be subject to the rules, policies, standards, and
specifications of Section 86 of the State of California Standard Specifications
(SSS) and State of California Standard Plans (SSP) and each agencies'
respective standards and specifications, and policies.
1.4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION DESIGN FINALIZATION PHASE
REQUIREMENTS
1.4.1 AUTHORITY shall issue a Notice to Proceed (NTP) to CONSULTANT to begin
the TSS design finalization phase and related activities. The design finalization
phase shall include the following specific activities:
a. Review all completed design phase documentation completed by others
including, but not limited to, reports, plans, diagrams, and data.
b. Provide a technical memorandum to AUTHORITY detailing findings of the
completed design phase documentation review.
c. Compile and review all agencies comments for the submitted Draft traffic
signal timing plans and Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plans completed
by others.
d. Obtain AUTHORITY approval to proceed with the Signal Timing
Optimization task deliverables.
e. Submit Final traffic signal timing plans and Final Signal Timing
Optimization Plan to AUTHORITY and agencies which addresses all
comments provided by AUTHORITY and agencies in the Draft Signal
Timing Optimization Plan.
Scope of Work 16 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
f. Obtain final AUTHORITY and agencies approvals to complete the TSS
design finalization phase prior to the beginning of the implementation
phase.
1.4.2 The TSS Design Phase is separated into the following sections: Bristol/State
College BRT Corridor TSS Design Services (Part "A"), Harbor Boulevard BRT
Corridor TSS Design Services (Part "B"), and Westminster/17th Street BRT
Corridor TSS Design Services (Part "C"). With AUTHORITY oversight,
approximately 80% of the TSS Design Phase was completed by others.
Table 1-5 summarizes the completion status for each TSS Design Phase task
and deliverable along the BRT Corridors and lists what file format the completed
deliverables are available.
Scope of Work 17 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 1-5
TSS Daninn Phase Task Comnietion Status
TSS Design Phase Task
Task Deliverable
Completiori'Statu''
File
°Format
TSS Study Alignment
Verification
TSS Alignment Final Report
• Completed by others.
PDF and
MS Word
Data Collection Report including
PDF, MS
existing timing sheets and as -built
• Completed by others.
Word and
drawings.
MS Excel
Data Collection
24-hour traffic counts
• Completed by others.
MS Excel
Axle classification counts
• Completed by others.
MS Excel
Intersection peak period turning
Completed by others.
MS Excel
movement traffic counts
Field Inventory Report
•Completed by others.
PDF and
MS Word
Inventory of Existing Traffic
PDF, MS
Signals, Field Masters/Hubs
Field Review Summary Sheets of
. Completed by others.
Word and
Locations, Signal
each signalized intersection
MS Visio
Communications, and Traffic
Management Systems
photographs of each intersection
PDF and
including the location and inside of
• Completed by others.
MS Word
each signal controller cabinet
PDF, MS
"Before" Study Project Report
• Completed by others.
Word and
"Before" Study
MS Excel
Floating car data using PC Travel
• Completed by others.
PDF and
PC Travel
software
data files
• Completed by others and
PDF and
Draft optimized and synchronized
submitted to Agencies for
Synchro
traffic signal timing plans produced
initial review. Agency
7.0 data
with Synchro
comment collection and
files
coordination not completed.
• Completed by others and
PDF and
Draft Time -Space Diagrams
submitted to Agencies for
Tru —
produced with Tru-Traffic TS/PP
initial review. Agency
Traffic
comment collection and
TS/PP
coordination not completed.
data files
• Completed by others and
Signal Timing Optimization
Draft Signal Timing Optimization
submitted to Agencies for
PDF, MS
Plan
initial review. Agency
Word and
comment collection and
MS Excel
coordination not completed.
Final optimized and synchronized
traffic signal timing plans produced
• Not completed.
None
with Synchro
Final Time -Space Diagrams
• Not completed.
None
produced with Tru-Traffic TS/PP
Final Signal Timing Optimization
. Not completed.
No
Plan
Scope of Work 18 09/09/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
1.5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
REQUIREMENTS
1.5.1 AUTHORITY shall issue a Notice to Proceed (NTP) to CONSULTANT to begin
the TSS Implementation Phase and related activities after the TSS Design
Finalization Phase is successfully completed and approved in writing by
AUTHORITY. The Implementation Phase shall include, but not be limited to, the
following activities:
a. Signal Timing Implementation and Fine -Tuning
b. Furnishing of equipment, equipment installation, and testing of equipment,
as specified in SOW.
1.5.2 The TSS Implementation Phase is outlined in the following sections: Bristol/State
College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services (Part "A"), Harbor Boulevard
BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services (Part "B"), and Westminster/1 7 th
Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services (Part "C").
1.6 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION SUPPORT SERVICES PHASE
REQUIREMENTS
1.6.1 AUTHORITY shall issue a Notice to Proceed (NTP) to CONSULTANT to begin
the TSS Support Services Phase and related activities after the TSS
Implementation Phase is successfully completed and approved in writing by
AUTHORITY. The Support Services Phase shall include, but is not limited to, the
following activities:
a. Provide support services for all three (3) corridors as specified in the
SOW.
1.6.2 The TSS Support Services Phase is outlined in the following sections:
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Support Services (Part "A"), Harbor
Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Support Services (Part "B"), and Westminster/17th
Street BRT Corridor TSS Support Services (Part "C").
1.7 GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES
1.7.1 AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITIES
AUTHORITY shall be responsible for the following:
1. Provide CONSULTANT with approximately 80% completed TSS design
phase documentation, agreements with agencies, and other data and
documents that may contribute to completing the required deliverables
within the SOW.
Scope of Work 19 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
2. Assist CONSULTANT with communication and liaison with agencies,
contractors, and other similarly involved third parties.
1.7.2 CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the following:
1. Conduct daily project management tasks, organize and attend meetings,
develop progress reports, develop and monitor schedules, and create and
submit monthly invoices (Deliverable) to AUTHORITY.
2. Perform all tasks required in SOW to evaluate and determine
implementation support and procurement issues for the installation and
implementation of each corridor.
3. As part of this CONTRACT, CONSULTANT shall furnish, install, test,
commission, perform operations activities, and contract closeout activities
for a fully functional TSS, which shall include the items that meet the
specified requirements.
4. Provide a complete and fully functional TSS implementation with all
necessary equipment, even if the materials or equipment are not
specifically identified herein.
5. Prior to designing and installing the equipment, CONSULTANT shall
obtain all necessary permits, licenses, and written approvals from the
governing agencies for all necessary installations. This shall also include
all additional permits, licenses, and approvals resulting from changes,
modifications, and specified upgrades at no additional cost to
AUTHORITY.
6. Per the requirements herein, CONSULTANT shall cooperate with all
involved parties including parties performing other work not specified in
this CONTRACT, the cities, Caltrans, and regulating agencies. All work in
this CONTRACT shall be coordinated through AUTHORITY unless
approved otherwise in writing by AUTHORITY.
7. Per requirements herein, CONSULTANT shall develop schedules in
conjunction with, and in coordination with, AUTHORITY's other TSS
contracts and other AUTHORITY programs and projects.
8. CONSULTANT shall be responsible, upon written approval by
AUTHORITY, to coordinate and perform all necessary lane closures and
detour traffic for public safety during the installation of required equipment.
9. Due to emergencies, local agency requirements, or other projects, it is
possible that CONSULTANT may have to work alternate hours not
considered as normal business hours. CONSULTANT shall be given
Scope of Work 20 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
written information from the AUTHORITY on such situations and
CONSULTANT shall continue to function as required by this SOW without
additional cost to AUTHORITY.
10. In an event of non-compliance, CONSULTANT may have to stop work and
take corrective actions on the work completed as directed by
AUTHORITY.
11. CONSULTANT is encouraged to propose alternative proven
implementation strategies that benefit AUTHORITY through cost savings,
equipment reliability, reduced maintenance, and other means deemed
appropriate.
12. Per the requirements herein, CONSULTANT must submit completed and
quality checked deliverables to AUTHORITY according to milestones
within the Project Schedule (Deliverable).
Scope of Work 21 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 2.0
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Scope of Work 22 09/09/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION
This section specifies CONSULTANT's project management requirements
starting from the NTP through Final Acceptance of the TSS Design Finalization,
Implementation, and Support Services Phase.
CONSULTANT shall not distribute, disclose, or communicate the SOW
activities with the public, media, or other AUTHORITY and/or agencies'
contractors, and other similarly involved third parties without prior written
consent from AUTHORITY. Any such requests to CONSULTANT shall be
brought promptly to AUTHORITY's attention.
2. CONSULTANT shall cooperate with AUTHORITY, agencies, contractors,
and other similarly involved third parties, to the extent reasonably
necessary for the performance by such other consultants or contractors.
CONSULTANT shall not interfere or hinder the progress and work
conducted by other contractors and/or agencies' personnel. In case of
conflict or possible schedule and/or site related issues, CONSULTANT
shall bring such issues to AUTHORITY and/or agencies' immediate
attention for resolution.
3. CONSULTANT shall not communicate the SOW activities with previous
consultant and his sub consultants without prior written consent from
AUTHORITY. Any such requests to CONSULTANT shall be brought
promptly to AUTHORITY's attention.
2.2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
1. CONSULTANT shall have key staff for Design Finalization,
Implementation, and Support Services Phases located within the Orange
County area for the duration of the CONTRACT. Orange County area is
defined as Orange County and locations within 10 miles of the Orange
County border.
2. For the duration of the CONTRACT, CONSULTANT shall be involved in
and responsible for the entire management of the TSS design finalization,
implementation, and support services including the purchasing and
furnishing of necessary equipment and interface equipment, installation,
inspection, testing, and commissioning of the work provided under this
SOW.
3. CONSULTANT shall assign a qualified, experienced, and licensed
certified California Traffic Engineer with a minimum of 10 years of TSS
experience and familiarity with agencies in Orange County as the Project
Scope of Work 23 05/07/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Manager (PM). The PM shall be responsible for overseeing the project
activities and shall be the single point of contact between AUTHORITY
and CONSULTANT and shall be responsible for all administrative and
management duties under this SOW as specified herein including, but not
limited to, providing directions to CONSULTANT staff, providing directions
to sub -consultants, contractors, agency personnel, and general project
coordination.
4. Field Technicians shall have a minimum of five (5) years experience of
providing signal timing implementation services, shall be familiar with the
different controller systems (hardware/software) as described in the SOW,
and shall be familiar with the agencies in Orange County.
5. CONSULTANT shall proceed with the number of sufficient qualified
personnel necessary to expedite and fully complete all services as
required under this CONTRACT in a professional manner and all
applicable professional standards. If the AUTHORITY observes
deficiencies with the CONSULTANT's PM, the AUTHORITY will request
the CONSULTANT to replace the PM within fifteen (15) days to ensure
the successful completion of this project within budget and schedule. If
such actions are required, CONSULTANT shall provide credentials for
review and approval by AUTHORITY.
6. CONSULTANT shall develop and submit for AUTHORITY written approval
a Work Plan (Deliverable) fifteen (15) days after NTP. The Work Plan
shall include the following:
a. CONSULTANT Organization chart with defined roles,
responsibilities, and percent commitment to this project.
b. Outline of tasks required to meet the goals and objectives defined
within the SOW.
c. Outline coordination requirements with agencies, contractor,
coordination requirements including, but not limited to:
i. CONSULTANT shall meet with AUTHORITY on a bi-
weekly basis throughout the project, and conduct
required meetings with agencies, contractors, and other
similarly involved third parties to complete tasks and
deliverables.
7. Project Schedule — Baseline (Deliverable) to submit to AUTHORITY in a
format as approved by AUTHORITY within fifteen (15) days after NTP.
Scope of Work 24 05/07/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
1. All durations and dates within the Project Schedule and this SOW
shall be in reference to calendar days.
2. Project Schedule shall be provided in a clear, concise, and legible
format for approval by AUTHORITY. Project Schedule shall be
submitted at a minimum on 11 inches by 17 inches medium
suitable for black and white reproduction. Electronic file copies
shall be provided on Compact Disc (CD-ROM).
3. Project Schedule shall include:
a. Title block, revision block, CONTRACT number, and legend.
b. NTP date, interim milestones as specified in SOW,
completion of specific tasks, and CONTRACT completion
date.
c. Scheduled start and/or completion dates imposed on
schedule by CONSULTANT consistent with SOW. Define
milestone events as scheduled dates specified in SOW and
prominently identify (flag) and connect to appropriate activity,
denoting start and completion, as applicable. Verify that
start milestones constrain start of dependent items.
d. Project Schedule shall be created, updated, and submitted in
Microsoft Project 2007 format (.MPP file format).
e. CONSULTANT shall update the Project Schedule upon
changes showing actual progress, actual start/finish dates
(shown for work items in progress), and identify current
sequence to milestones and project completion.
f. CONSULTANT shall make revisions to the Project Schedule
in the same format and detail as the baseline Project
Schedule. Proposed revisions are subject to AUTHORITY
review and approval.
g. Failure to include items required for performance of the
SOW shall not excuse CONSULTANT from completing work
required to achieve milestone event completion,
notwithstanding AUTHORITY written approval of the Project
Schedule.
Scope of Work 25 05/07/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
8. Final Deliverables List (Deliverable) within fifteen (15) days after NTP for
written approval by AUTHORITY.
9. Develop Monthly Progress Reports and invoices with detailed backup
information (Deliverable). The report shall include details of the current
status of the project against the work plan and the Project Schedule
(Deliverable). The Monthly Progress Report shall be updated and kept
current by CONSULTANT throughout the duration of CONTRACT and
shall clearly show start and completion dates of all activities. An updated
and current project schedule shall be included in each Monthly Progress
Report (Deliverable). The report shall include:
1 . Status of each deliverable.
2. Delays and issues with planned actions.
3. Organizational changes with key staff and level of commitment (all
key staff changes will require submittal of resume outlining level of
expertise as pertaining to project).
4. Progress of sub -consultants.
5. Include actual start and completion dates for work items completed
during report period.
6. Estimated remaining durations for work items in progress.
7. Identification of possible delays for work items scheduled to start
during month following report period.
8. Work items not included in the Project Schedule (Deliverable).
9. Any potential delays identified in the Monthly Progress Report
(Deliverable) shall be addressed as follows:
i. If the delay is within CONSULTANT's control, CONSULTANT
shall identify the problem, its cause, the work items affected,
any additional costs implications, and provide an explanation of
the proposed corrective action to meet the affected milestone
dates and/or to mitigate further delays.
Scope of Work 26 05/07/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
If the delay is not within CONSULTANT's control,
CONSULTANT shall identify the problem, its cause, its
duration, the specific work items affected, any additional costs
impacts, and the logic constraints of each work item.
CONSULTANT shall propose steps to mitigate any resulting
delay.
10. Submit all project documentation. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for
all delivery costs incurred in submitting project documentation to
AUTHORITY and agencies. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for
implementing corrections, as applicable, for all deliverables and
deliverable data as specified within the SOW including, but not limited to,
plans, schedules, and reports.
11. Interface with AUTHORITY, agencies, contractors, and other similarly
involved third parties regarding the requirements outlined in the SOW.
CONSULTANT shall maintain a record of all contact information and
provide information to AUTHORITY upon request in hard copy and
electronic formats compatible with Microsoft Office 2007 upon request.
12. Plan, schedule, arrange, and participate in all meetings related to the
SOW and as required by AUTHORITY. Document all meetings, prepare
and deliver agendas, and produce/distribute meeting minutes and action
item matrices (Deliverable).
13. Provide all pertinent project records to AUTHORITY no later than fifteen
(15) days after AUTHORITY written acceptance of the Final Technical
Reports (Deliverable). Documents shall be organized in accordance with
AUTHORITY Uniform Filing System or as specified by AUTHORITY in
writing.
14. Assist AUTHORITY with post audits, as requested by AUTHORITY in
writing.
15. CONSULTANT shall prepare and maintain a detailed progress schedule,
which shall be CONSULTANT's working schedule and shall be used to
plan, organize, and execute the work; record and report actual
performance and progress; and forecast remaining work. CONSULTANT
must fully comply with the schedule submission requirements specified
herein to ensure the timely processing of payments. Specifically,
submission of the monthly schedule update is a condition precedent to
any payment under this SOW. Work shall be scheduled so that any
specified intermediate milestone dates and completion dates are met.
16. The work specified in the requirement consists of submitting a schedule in
sufficient detail to show the sequence in which CONSULTANT proposes
Scope of Work 27 05/07/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
to carry out work required under the SOW, from NTP through CONTRACT
completion. The planning, scheduling, management, and execution of
work in accordance with the SOW are the responsibility of the
CONSULTANT.
Scope of Work 28 05/07/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 3.0
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION DESIGN FINALIZATION
Scope of Work 29 05/07/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 3.OTRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION DESIGN FINALIZATION
3.1 PART "A" — BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES
3.1 .1 TASK A-1 : BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — KICK-OFF MEETING
CONSULTANT shall have a kick-off meeting with the AUTHORITY to discuss the
following:
1 . Bristol/State College BRT Corridor alignment
2. List of arterial/collector roads
3. List of signalized intersections
4. Other projects along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor
5. Goals and objectives of the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS
6. Completed and remaining TSS Design Phase Project tasks
7. TSS analysis process
8. Review and approval coordination process
9. Project schedule, key milestones, and deliverables
3.1.2 TASK A-2: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED TSS STUDY ALIGNMENT
VERIFICATION
Previous consultant reviewed the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor signalized
intersection list provided by the AUTHORITY and met with each affected agency
to verify the number of signalized intersections that would be included on each
arterial/collector road along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor.
Previous consultant completed Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS
Alignment Draft and Final Reports showing the study area including the
arterials/collector roads and the number of signalized intersections that were
synchronized as part of this project.
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word and Adobe Acrobat
(PDF) format, of the completed AUTHORITY and agencies approved TSS
Alignment Final Report to the CONSULTANT for review and background
information.
Scope of Work 30 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable,
as described in Section 3.1.6, to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed TSS Alignment Final Report review.
3.1 .3 TASK A-3: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED DATA COLLECTION
Previous consultant collected all data necessary to thoroughly understand
existing traffic conditions along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor to facilitate
the development of optimal time -of -day traffic signal synchronization plans.
Previous consultant collected from the affected agencies the following:
1. Existing timing sheets
2. Existing synchronization plans
3. Existing synchronization zones
4. Traffic signal as -built drawings
5. Traffic signal communication as -built drawings
6. Traffic Management System as -built drawings
7. Aerial photos
8. Maps
Previous consultant also collected from affected agencies signal timing and
signal priority preferences, including, but not limited to, those related to
pedestrian and bicycle timing, leading and lagging left -turn phasing, and
conditional service, as well as the timing optimization software preference.
Previous consultant conducted all required seven-day 24-hour machine traffic
counts, and axle traffic counts at AUTHORITY approved locations. Data
obtained from Saturday traffic counts was used to determine the necessity of
weekend signal timing. Thirty-six (36) machine traffic counts were collected for
the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor at approximately one -mile spacing.
Previous consultant conducted weekday peak period turning movement traffic
counts at all study intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle counts.
Weekday counts were conducted for two hours of each peak period (AM, mid-
day, and PM). Weekend turning movement traffic counts were conducted for a
single two-hour Saturday mid -day peak period.
Peak period turning movement traffic counts were collected at 96 of the 97
approved signalized intersections along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor.
Scope of Work 31 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Peak period turning movement traffic counts were not collected at future
signalized intersections.
All traffic counts are summarized in MS Excel format. AUTHORITY shall provide
electronic copies of the raw data count sheets to the CONSULTANT along the
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor.
AUTHORITY shall provide electronic copies of the following completed and
AUTHORITY approved Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Data Collection
deliverables for CONSULTANT review and background information:
1. Report, in MS Word, MS Excel, and Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format,
summarizing data collection effort, including timing sheets, coordination
plans, coordination zones, as -built drawings, aerial photos, maps, traffic
collision analysis, and traffic collision diagrams.
2. 24-hour traffic counts, in MS Excel format, collected during the month of
October 2008.
3. Axle classification traffic counts, in MS Excel format, collected during the
month of October 2008.
4. Intersection peak period turning movement traffic counts, in MS Excel
format, collected during the month of October 2008, early November 2008
(prior to the Thanksgiving holiday), and late January 2009.
For all existing signalized intersections in which existing signal timing is modified
or where new signalized intersections are constructed during the TSS Design
Finalization Phase, CONSULTANT shall collect from the respective agencies all
updated or new timing sheets and traffic signal as -built drawings for incorporation
into the Signal Timing Optimization task. Anticipated existing signal timing
modifications and new signalized intersections along the Bristol/State College
Boulevard BRT Corridor include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. State College Boulevard at Artisan Court (new signalized intersection)
b. The City Drive at Garden Grove Boulevard/Memory Lane (signal timing
modification)
c. Metropolitan Drive at SR-22 WB Ramps (signal timing modification)
d. Bristol Street at 17th Street (signal timing modification)
e. Bristol Street at Santa Ana Boulevard (signal timing modification)
f. Bristol Street at First Street (signal timing modification)
g. Bristol Street at Willits Street/Bishop Street (signal timing modification)
Scope of Work 32 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
h. Bristol Street at McFadden Avenue (signal timing modification)
Bristol Street at Warner Avenue (signal timing modification)
The anticipated existing signal timing modifications and new signalized
intersection locations listed above are for reference only and CONSULTANT
shall coordinate and verify with the respective agencies.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable,
as described in Section 3.1.6, to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed Data Collection deliverables review.
3.1 .4 TASK A-4: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED INVENTORY OF
EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNALS, FIELD MASTERS/HUBS LOCATIONS, SIGNAL
COMMUNICATIONS, AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Previous consultant reviewed the geometric layout, existing traffic signal
equipment, and identified any deficiencies (outdated controller
hardware/software, obsolete equipment, etc.) for each intersection along the
selected synchronized segments along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor.
The review included an assessment of the existing intersection geometry
(number of lanes, lane width, lane storage, crosswalks, etc), traffic conditions,
and traffic signal control equipment along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor
using observation, available as -built plans, consultation with the local agencies,
and agency aerial photos. With documented permission of the local agencies,
previous consultant inspected the interior of each traffic control cabinet and
made recommendations for equipment upgrades.
Previous consultant verified existing traffic signal communication systems along
the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor including equipment inside the signal
controller cabinets and reviewed field masters/hubs locations and equipment.
Previous consultant reviewed the agencies' traffic management system(s)
including hardware and software.
Previous consultant also identified all planned and programmed improvements
(widening projects, intersection improvements, etc.) on the selected
synchronized segments along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor. The
identification of these projects included a list summarizing all improvements.
Key components of the completed corridor review included, but were not limited
to the following:
1. Bristol/State College BRT Corridor lane configurations and lane widths.
Scope of Work 33 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
2. Existing street and lane geometries, curbs, median, sidewalk width,
pedestrian ramps, etc.
3. Location of traffic control equipment at signalized intersections — poles,
controller cabinets, service cabinets, telephone service, detector loops,
existing service location connection, etc.
4. Traffic signs and pavement markings at intersections along the
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor and cross streets.
5. Traffic signal controller information, such as type of controller, brand and
make, condition of equipment.
6. Existing signal operation characteristics — signal phasing, cycle lengths,
lead -lag, protective -permissive, etc.
7. Existing signal communication equipment.
8. Existing time -referencing setup.
9. Special characteristics such as proximity to adjacent intersections,
location of bus stops, location of driveways, parking prohibitions, and
other factors that may affect the efficiency of operation.
10. Photographed each intersection including location of signal controller
cabinet.
11. Phot ographed the inside of each signal controller cabinet.
12. Noted any deficiencies of traffic control equipment at each intersection.
13. Noted the maintenance condition of the traffic signal equipment.
14. Existing preemptio n devices.
The field notes were prepared and approved by AUTHORITY in writing.
Previous consultant noted factors that are expected to affect signal progression
including, but not limited to: intersections with high pedestrian or bicyclist
volumes; over -saturated intersections; uneven lane distribution; high volumes of
trucks and buses; high -volume un-signalized intersections, including
interchanges; parking maneuvers; location of bus stops; differing signal timing
patterns among agencies; etc.
Previous consultant identified any deficiencies of the existing traffic signal control
equipment (i.e. hardware, software) and geometric layout. Previous consultant
provided recommended solutions that may be implemented in order to correct
deficiencies and improve the traffic operations along the Bristol/State College
Scope of Work 34 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
BRT Corridor. Recommendations provided include, but are not limited to,
replacement of traffic signal controller(s), software upgrades, installation of GPS
clocks, other traffic signal equipment upgrades/replacement, and geometric
layout improvements.
Previous consultant prepared a Field Inventory Report summarizing the findings
of the field review. The report contains photos and field review summary sheets
of each signalized intersection. The report is provided in sections in accordance
to each arterial along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor.
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word, MS Visio, and Adobe
Acrobat (PDF) format, of the completed AUTHORITY and agencies approved
Field Inventory Report to the CONSULTANT for review and background
information.
CONSULTANT shall review and verify the following key components of the
completed corridor review by others:
1. Bristol/State College BRT Corridor lane configurations
2. Existing street and lane geometries
3. Existing signal operation characteristics — signal phasing, cycle lengths,
lead -lag, protective -permissive, etc.
If any existing field inventory changes in the completed corridor review are
observed, CONSULTANT shall conduct all necessary field work and provide field
notes to correct and implement these changes into the TSS design finalization
phase. Before field work is conducted, all proposed field work locations shall be
presented to AUTHORITY for review and approval. All field notes shall be
prepared in a neat and readable format and approved by AUTHORITY in writing.
All field work shall be photographed and photos shall be provided to the
AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall identify any deficiencies in the existing traffic signal control
timing parameters or settings at each project intersection including: Pedestrian
Walk and Pedestrian Clearance intervals; Bicycle and/or Automobile/Truck timing
for Minimum Green; Yellow Change; and, All Red Clearance intervals as required
by the MUTCD, CA MUTCD, Traffic Operations Policy Directives (TOPD), or
enacted laws governing such issues. These deficiencies shall be submitted to
the AUTHORITY and the agencies for review and comment.
Each local agency shall be solely responsible for, and provide direction to
CONSULTANT and AUTHORITY in the methods and formulas used to calculate
the correct time settings for these respective timing intervals. These policies will
be on file with the AUTHORITY.
Scope of Work 35 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable,
as described in Section 3.1.6, to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed Field Inventory Report review.
3.1 .5 TASK A-5: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED BRISTOL/STATE
COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR "BEFORE" STUDY
Previous consultant conducted a "Before" field study report representative of the
times and days for which synchronization plans were developed. The report
identified Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) to evaluate the effects of the
synchronization plans. MOE's included traffic flow, travel time, average speed,
stops, fuel consumption reduction, pollution reduction, and other pertinent items.
The identified MOE's were compiled for the corridor using the floating car method
and Synchro 7.0.
For the "Before" field study, previous consultant conducted a minimum of five (5)
floating car "runs" in each direction and during all periods in which
synchronization plans were developed.
The completed report addresses optimization strategies for signal
synchronization, specifically focusing on how to synchronize the Bristol/State
College BRT Corridor (i.e. end -to -end optimization and/or coordinated zones).
The report defines the traffic patterns along the Bristol/State College BRT
Corridor throughout the day and throughout the week.
The analysis was based on all floating car data collected using a GPS device
and PC Travel software. AUTHORITY shall provide all PC Travel data files and
an electronic copy, in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format, of the PC Travel summary
reports for CONSULTANT review and background information. Previous
consultant prepared a "Before" Study Project Report and finalized the "Before"
Study Project Report based on comments received from the AUTHORITY.
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word, MS Excel, and
Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format, of the completed and AUTHORITY approved
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor "Before" Study Project Report for
CONSULTANT review and background information.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable,
as described in Section 3.1.6 to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed "Before" Study Project Report review.
3.1 .6 TASK A-6: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — COMPLETED DESIGN PHASE
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW
Scope of Work 36 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall review all completed design phase documentation by others
listed above in Sections 3.1.2 through 3.1.5 and below in Section 3.1.7.
CONSULTANT shall prepare a technical memorandum detailing findings of the
design phase documentation review. The report shall contain, but not be limited
to, the following:
a. Review Findings
b. Deficiencies
c. Changes of Existing Field Conditions (lane configuration, signal phasing,
etc.)
d. Missing Information / Incomplete Information
e. Information required to update the completed design phase
documentation by others
f. Recommendations Required to Complete the Remaining TSS Design
Finalization Tasks
The report shall be provided in sections in accordance to each design phase
document reviewed.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Design Finalization Services deliverables
(in part to include):
A6a. Technical memorandum detailing findings of the completed design phase
documentation review.
3.1 .7 TASK A-7: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION
Previous consultant developed a Draft model of the study area approved by the
AUTHORITY. Previous consultant calibrated the draft model based on travel
time, delay studies, field observations of queue lengths, and saturation flows for
heavy movements at key intersections. CONSULTANT shall review, verify, and
update the previously prepared Draft model of the study area, as defined in this
task. Signal synchronization optimization shall be conducted in Synchro 7.0 and
optimization shall be augmented with Tru — Traffic TS/PP version 8.0.
If the CONSULTANT elects to use alternative methodologies to augment or
replace certain aspects of the Synchro model such as pre-processing of certain
data sets or split analysis, and/or other types of processes, the CONSULTANT
shall describe these operations in detail in the report with supporting
documentation as to why these processes were used in lieu of or in
augmentation to the Synchro model. These methodologies shall also be
described in detail in the CONSULTANT'S proposal for this project.
CONSULTANT shall develop an operational model within SimTraffic software.
The SimTraffic model will identify those local areas or portions of the project that
Scope of Work 37 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
need special operational analysis of queue interactions such as starvation or
spillback. The operational analysis shall be used to supplement the "Before" and
"After" studies, to understand the effects of planned corridor improvements, fine
tune timing plans prior to implementation, and to analyze the additional
operational improvements as recommended by CONSULTANT. The entire
corridor does not have to be micro — simulated. Analysis shall be performed on
corridor segments that have queuing, starvation, spillback, or other problems
which can be mitigated by the SimTraffic program.
CONSULTANT shall develop final optimized signal timings using Synchro 7.0,
and recommend any changes to the signal phasing at each signalized
intersection that may improve the efficiency of operations. The recommended
final signal timing plans shall be reviewed for comments by the AUTHORITY and
agencies' staffs.
CONSULTANT shall evaluate signal timing and coordination parameters with
consideration for the following:
1. Review and verification of completed design documentation provided and
update the signal timing and coordination parameters as deemed
appropriate through review findings, field observations, etc.
2. Optimum coordination timing, lead/lag or lead/lead left -turn phasing as
deemed appropriate (except at Protected/Permissive locations, where
phasing will be lead/lead only), double or half cycling, and other such
techniques.
3. Timing parameters which provide adequate splits and corresponding
offsets which fully accommodate pedestrians within the split time.
CONSULTANT shall take into consideration the pedestrian timing
parameters used by the local agency on a case by case basis.
4. Timing parameters which incorporate minimal pedestrian activity to
provide the optimum vehicle split and offset timing and accommodate
pedestrians using various pedestrian timing adjustment techniques for
pedestrian splits during coordination.
5. Appropriate cycle lengths and signal groupings consistent with the goals
of this effort. Preliminary proposed cycle lengths and signal groupings
were developed by the previous consultant and presented to the agencies
for review and comment. All agency preliminary comments have been
addressed by the previous consultant. Additionally, the previous
consultant has recommended time -of -day start and stop intervals for the
various timing plans.
6. CONSULTANT shall update, at minimum, timing plans which consider the
following peak periods: a.m. peak, mid -day peak, p.m. peak and one
Scope of Work 38 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
weekend peak. Timing plans shall be in both Synchro format and the
preferred timing chart format of each agency.
7. CONSULTANT shall update timing plans for a.m. peak, mid -day peak,
p.m. peak and a weekend peak based on the upcoming improvements for
the corridor as identified. Timing plans shall be in Synchro format and the
preferred timing chart format of each agency.
8. CONSULTANT shall review, verify, and update the previously prepared
Time -Space Diagrams for the synchronized segments along the BRT
Corridor.
Previous consultant prepared a Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan detailing
the signal timing optimization, including detail evaluation and recommendation on
the time -referencing system and analysis results. The Draft Signal Timing
Optimization Plan included, but was not limited to, the following:
a. Proposed cycle lengths and signal groupings by corridor and by agency
b. All Draft optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format, including (a) existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
programmed improvements (widening projects and intersection
improvements) within the next five years (after NTP).
c. Draft Time -Space diagrams for the synchronized segments along the BRT
Corridor.
The Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan was submitted to AUTHORITY and
agencies for review and comment. AUTHORITY has already provided their
review and all comments were addressed by the previous consultant.
AUTHORITY shall provide a copy of all AUTHORITY comments and agency
comments received.
CONSULTANT shall coordinate and collect from all agencies the Draft Signal
Timing Optimization Plan comments. CONSULTANT shall incorporate
comments into the Final Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
Final Time -Space diagrams shall match those completed by previous consultant
and submitted to the agencies for review and comment. The Time -Space
diagrams shall be in color, be scaled both horizontally and vertically, show
vehicle splits and movements for each intersection, show offsets and
intersection distances listed below the intersections, and show forward and
reverse green bands with applicable phase sequences. The Time -Space
diagrams shall be separated per signal grouping and peak period plan and fully
annotated with proposed cycle lengths, travel direction, signal grouping zone
limits, and peak period plan identification. All intersections with crossing
coordination, half cycle lengths, and existing and proposed pedestrian overrides
shall be annotated as such on the Time -Space Diagrams. For a sample Draft
Scope of Work 39 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Time -Space Diagram completed by the previous consultant, see Reference
Documents — Attachment B.
AUTHORITY shall provide electronic copies of the following completed and
AUTHORITY approved Bristol/State College Boulevard BRT Corridor Signal
Timing Optimization deliverables for CONSULTANT review and use:
1. All Draft optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format, including (a) existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
programmed improvements (widening projects and intersection
improvements) within the next five years (after NTP).
2. Draft Time -Space diagrams, in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format and Tru —
Traffic TS/PP data files.
3. Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan, in MS Word, MS Excel, and Adobe
Acrobat (PDF) format.
4. Electronic Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Draft analysis.
CONSULTANT shall submit a Final Signal Timing Optimization Plan to
AUTHORITY and agencies which addresses all comments provided by
AUTHORITY and agencies in the Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Design deliverables (in part to include):
Ala. All Final optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format and the preferred timing chart format of each agency, including (a)
existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and programmed
improvements (widening projects and intersection improvements) within
the next five years (after NTP).
Alb. Final Time -Space diagrams.
A7c. Final Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
A7d. Electronic Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Final analysis.
Ale. Electronic SimTraffic data files used in the Final analysis.
Alf. Electronic versions of the Final analysis and all data files including the Tru
— Traffic TS/PP files.
3.1.8 TASK A-8: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
CONSULTANT shall develop a schedule for meetings with AUTHORITY,
agencies, manufacturers, and others in order to facilitate the review/approval
Scope of Work 40 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
process of the signal synchronization along the Bristol/State College BRT
Corridor.
CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as directed by AUTHORITY and agencies
to discuss specific information and requirements related to the signal
synchronization along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor.
Meetings will also consist of any specific meeting called by AUTHORITY and
agencies, at which CONSULTANT's attendance is required.
It is required that in the TSS Design Finalization Phase, CONSULTANT,
AUTHORITY, and agencies (if available), conduct bi-weekly meetings in order to
provide a continuous dialogue and develop a team relationship for the success of
this project.
CONSULTANT shall prepare and distribute meeting minutes and action item
matrix to the project team within five (5) days from the meeting. AUTHORITY
and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting agendas for their review
and written approval prior to the preparation of final meeting agendas.
AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting minutes for
their review and written approval prior to the distribution of final meeting minutes.
AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be invited and shall participate at every
meeting.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Design deliverables (in part to include):
A8a. Project Meeting Agendas.
A8b. Project Meeting Minutes and Action items.
A8c. Action Item Matrix.
3.2 PART "B" — HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES
3.2.1 TASK B-1: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — KICK-OFF MEETING
CONSULTANT shall have a kick-off meeting with the AUTHORITY to discuss the
following:
1. Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor alignment
2. List of arterial/collector roads
3. List of signalized intersections
4. Other projects along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor
Scope of Work 41 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
5. Goals and objectives of the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS
6. Completed and remaining TSS Design Phase Project tasks
7. TSS analysis process
8. Review and approval coordination process
9. Project schedule, key milestones, and deliverables
3.2.2 TASK B-2: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED TSS STUDY ALIGNMENT
VERIFICATION
Previous consultant reviewed the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor signalized
intersection list provided by the AUTHORITY and met with each affected agency
to verify the number of signalized intersections that would be included on each
arterial/collector road along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
Previous consultant completed Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Alignment
Draft and Final Reports showing the study area including the arterials/collector
roads and the number of signalized intersections that were synchronized as part
of this project.
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word and Adobe Acrobat
(PDF) format, of the completed AUTHORITY and agencies approved TSS
Alignment Final Report to the CONSULTANT for review and background
information.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable
as described in Section 3.2.6 to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed TSS Alignment Final Report review.
3.2.3 TASK B-3: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED DATA COLLECTION
Previous consultant collected all data necessary to thoroughly understand
existing traffic conditions along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor to facilitate
the development of optimal time -of -day traffic signal synchronization plans.
Previous consultant collected from the affected agencies the following:
1. Existing timing sheets
2. Existing synchronization plans
3. Existing synchronization zones
Scope of Work 42 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
4. Traffic signal as -built drawings
5. Traffic signal communication as -built drawings
6. Traffic Management System as -built drawings
7. Aerial photos
8. Maps
Previous consultant also collected from affected agencies signal timing and
signal priority preferences, including, but not limited to, those related to
pedestrian and bicycle timing, leading and lagging left -turn phasing, and
conditional service, as well as the timing optimization software preference.
Previous consultant conducted all required seven-day 24-hour machine traffic
counts, and axle traffic counts at AUTHORITY approved locations. Data
obtained from Saturday traffic counts was used to determine the necessity of
weekend signal timing. Thirty-six (36) machine traffic counts were collected for
the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor at approximately one -mile spacing.
Previous consultant conducted weekday peak period turning movement traffic
counts at all study intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle counts.
Weekday counts were conducted for two hours of each peak period (AM, mid-
day, and PM). Weekend turning movement traffic counts were conducted for a
single two-hour Saturday mid -day peak period.
Peak period turning movement traffic counts were collected at 104 of the 108
approved signalized intersections along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
Peak period turning movement traffic counts were not collected at the existing
intersection of Harbor Boulevard and La Verne Street (pedestrian crossing) and
all future signalized intersections.
All traffic counts are summarized in MS Excel format. AUTHORITY shall provide
electronic copies of the raw data count sheets to the CONSULTANT along the
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
AUTHORITY shall provide electronic copies of the following completed and
AUTHORTY approved Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Data Collection
deliverables for CONSULTANT review and background information:
1. Report, in MS Word, MS Excel, and Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format,
summarizing data collection effort, including timing sheets, coordination
plans, coordination zones, as -built drawings, aerial photos, maps, traffic
collision analysis, and traffic collision diagrams.
2. 24-hour traffic counts, in MS Excel format, collected during the month of
October 2008
Scope of Work 43 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
3. Axle classification traffic counts, in MS Excel format, collected during the
month of October 2008.
4. Intersection peak period turning movement traffic counts, in MS Excel
format, collected during the month of October, early November 2008 (prior
to the Thanksgiving holiday), and late May 2009.
For all existing signalized intersections in which existing signal timing is modified
or where new signalized intersections are constructed during the TSS Design
Finalization Phase, CONSULTANT shall collect from the respective agencies all
updated or new timing sheets and traffic signal as -built drawings for incorporation
into the Signal Timing Optimization task. Anticipated existing signal timing
modifications and new signalized intersections along the Harbor Boulevard BRT
Corridor include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Harbor Boulevard at Houston Avenue (new signalized intersection)
b. Harbor Boulevard at Chapman Avenue (South) (signal timing modification)
c. Harbor Boulevard at Twintree Lane (new signalized intersection)
d. Harbor Boulevard at Kent Avenue (new signalized intersection)
The anticipated existing signal timing modifications and new signalized
intersection locations listed above are for reference only and CONSULTANT
shall coordinate and verify with the respective agencies.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable
as described in Section 3.2.6 to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed Data Collection deliverables review.
3.2.4 TASK B-4: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED INVENTORY OF
EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNALS, FIELD MASTERS/HUBS LOCATIONS, SIGNAL
COMMUNICATIONS, AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Previous consultant reviewed the geometric layout, existing traffic signal
equipment, and identified any deficiencies (outdated controller
hardware/software, obsolete equipment, etc.) for each intersection along the
selected synchronized segments along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
The review included an assessment of the existing intersection geometry
(number of lanes, lane width, lane storage, crosswalks, etc), traffic conditions,
and traffic signal control equipment along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor
using observation, available as -built plans, consultation with the local agencies,
and agency aerial photos. With documented permission of the local agencies,
previous consultant inspected the interior of each traffic control cabinet and
made recommendations for equipment upgrades.
Scope of Work 44 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Previous consultant verified existing traffic signal communication systems along
the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor including equipment inside the signal
controller cabinets and reviewed field masters/hubs locations and equipment.
Previous consultant reviewed the agencies' traffic management system(s)
including hardware and software.
Previous consultant also identified all planned and programmed improvements
(widening projects, intersection improvements, etc.) on the selected
synchronized segments along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor. The
identification of these projects included a list summarizing all improvements.
Key components of the completed corridor review included, but were not limited
to the following:
1 . Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor lane configurations and lane widths.
2. Existing street and lane geometries, curbs, median, sidewalk width,
pedestrian ramps, etc.
3. Location of traffic control equipment at signalized intersections — poles,
controller cabinets, service cabinets, telephone service, detector loops,
existing service location connection, etc.
4. Traffic signs and pavement markings at intersections along the Harbor
Boulevard BRT Corridor and cross streets.
5. Traffic signal controller information, such as type of controller, brand and
make, condition of equipment.
6. Existing signal operation characteristics — signal phasing, cycle lengths,
lead -lag, protective -permissive, etc.
7. Existing signal communication equipment.
8. Existing time -referencing setup.
9. Special characteristics such as proximity to adjacent intersections,
location of bus stops, location of driveways, parking prohibitions, and
other factors that may affect the efficiency of operation.
10. Photographed each intersection including location of signal controller
cabinet.
11. Phot ographed the inside of each signal controller cabinet.
12. Note d any deficiencies of traffic control equipment at each intersection.
Scope of Work 45 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
13. Note d the maintenance condition of the traffic signal equipment.
14. Existing preemptio n devices.
The field notes were prepared and approved by AUTHORITY.
Previous consultant noted factors that are expected to affect signal progression
including, but not limited to: intersections with high pedestrian or bicyclist
volumes; over -saturated intersections; uneven lane distribution; high volumes of
trucks and buses; high -volume un-signalized intersections, including
interchanges; parking maneuvers; location of bus stops; differing signal timing
patterns among agencies; etc.
Previous consultant identified any deficiencies of the existing traffic signal control
equipment (i.e. hardware, software) and geometric layout. Previous consultant
provided recommended solutions that may be implemented in order to correct
deficiencies and improve the traffic operations along the Harbor Boulevard BRT
Corridor. Recommendations provided include, but are not limited to, replacement
of traffic signal controller(s), software upgrades, installation of GPS clocks, other
traffic signal equipment upgrades/replacement, and geometric layout
improvements.
Previous consultant prepared a Field Inventory Report summarizing the findings
of the field review. The report contains photos and field review summary sheets
of each signalized intersection. The report is provided in sections in accordance
to each arterial along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word, MS Visio, and Adobe
Acrobat (PDF) format, of the completed AUTHORITY and agencies approved
Field Inventory Report to the CONSULTANT for review and background
information.
Consultant shall review and verify the following key components of the
completed corridor review by others:
1 . Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor lane configurations
2. Existing street and lane geometries
3. Existing signal operation characteristics — signal phasing, cycle lengths,
lead -lag, protective -permissive, etc.
If any existing field inventory changes in the completed corridor review are
observed, CONSULTANT shall conduct all necessary fieldwork and provide field
notes to correct and implement these changes into the TSS design finalization
phase. Before fieldwork is conducted, all proposed fieldwork locations shall be
presented to AUTHORITY for review and approval. All field notes shall be
prepared in a neat and readable format and approved by AUTHORITY in writing.
Scope of Work 46 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
All fieldwork shall be photographed and photos shall be provided to the
AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall identify any deficiencies in the existing traffic signal control
timing parameters or settings at each project intersection including: Pedestrian
Walk and Pedestrian Clearance intervals; Bicycle and/or Automobile/Truck timing
for Minimum Green; Yellow Change; and, All Red Clearance intervals as required
by the MUTCD, CA MUTCD, Traffic Operations Policy Directives (TOPD), or
enacted laws governing such issues. These deficiencies shall be submitted to
the AUTHORITY and the agencies for review and comment.
Each local agency shall be solely responsible for, and provide direction to
CONSULTANT and AUTHORITY in the methods and formulas used to calculate
the correct time settings for these respective timing intervals. These policies will
be on file with the AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable,
as described in Section 3.2.6, to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed Field Inventory Report review.
3.2.5 TASK B-5: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED HARBOR BOULEVARD
BRT CORRIDOR "BEFORE" STUDY
Previous consultant conducted a "Before" field study report representative of the
times and days for which synchronization plans were developed. The report
identified Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) to evaluate the effects of the
synchronization plans. MOE's included traffic flow, travel time, average speed,
stops, fuel consumption reduction, pollution reduction, and other pertinent items.
The identified MOE's were compiled for the corridor using the floating car method
and Synchro 7.0.
For the "Before" field study, previous consultant conducted a minimum of five (5)
floating car "runs" in each direction and during all periods in which
synchronization plans were developed.
The completed report addresses optimization strategies for signal
synchronization, specifically focusing on how to synchronize the Harbor
Boulevard BRT Corridor (i.e. end -to -end optimization and/or coordinated zones).
The report defines the traffic patterns along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor
throughout the day and throughout the week.
The analysis was based on all floating car data collected using a GPS device
and PC Travel software. AUTHORITY shall provide all PC Travel data files and
an electronic copy, in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format, of the PC Travel summary
reports for CONSULTANT review and background information.
Scope of Work 47 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Previous consultant prepared a "Before" Study Project Report and finalized the
"Before" Study Project Report based on comments received from the
AUTHORITY.
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word, MS Excel, and
Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format, of the completed and AUTHORITY approved
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor "Before" Study Project Report for CONSULTANT
review and background information.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable,
as described in Section 3.2.6 to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed "Before" Study Project Report review.
3.2.6 TASK B-6: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — COMPLETED DESIGN PHASE
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW
CONSULTANT shall review all completed design phase documentation by others
listed above in Sections 3.2.2 through 3.2.5 and below in Section 3.2.7.
CONSULTANT shall prepare a technical memorandum detailing findings of the
design phase documentation review. The report shall contain, but not be limited
to, the following:
a. Review Findings
b. Deficiencies
c. Changes of Existing Field Conditions (lane configuration, signal phasing,
etc.)
d. Missing Information / Incomplete Information
e. Information required to update the completed design phase
documentation by others
f. Recommendations Required to Complete the Remaining TSS Design
Finalization Tasks
The report shall be provided in sections in accordance to each design phase
document reviewed.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Design Finalization Services deliverables
(in part to include):
B6a. Technical memorandum detailing findings of the completed design phase
documentation review.
3.2.7 TASK B-7: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION
Scope of Work 48 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Previous consultant developed a Draft model of the study area approved by the
AUTHORITY. Previous consultant calibrated the draft model based on travel
time, delay studies, field observations of queue lengths, and saturation flows for
heavy movements at key intersections. CONSULTANT shall review, verify, and
update the previously prepared Draft model of the study area as defined in this
task. Signal synchronization optimization shall be conducted in Synchro 7.0 and
optimization shall be augmented with Tru — Traffic TS/PP version 8.0.
If the CONSULTANT elects to use alternative methodologies to augment or
replace certain aspects of the Synchro model such as pre—processing of certain
data sets or split analysis, and/or other types of processes, the CONSULTANT
shall describe these operations in detail in the report with supporting
documentation as to why these processes were used in lieu of or in
augmentation to the Synchro model. These methodologies shall also be
described in detail in the CONSULTANT'S proposal for this project.
CONSULTANT shall develop an operational model within SimTraffic software.
The SimTraffic model will identify those local areas or portions of the project that
need special operational analysis of queue interactions such as starvation or
spillback. The operational analysis shall be used to supplement the "Before" and
"After" studies, to understand the effects of planned corridor improvements, fine
tune timing plans prior to implementation, and to analyze the additional
operational improvements as recommended by CONSULTANT. The entire
corridor does not have to be micro — simulated. Analysis shall be performed on
corridor segments that have queuing, starvation, spillback, or other problems
which can be mitigated by the SimTraffic program.
CONSULTANT shall develop final optimized signal timings using Synchro 7.0,
and recommend any changes to the signal phasing at each signalized
intersection that may improve the efficiency of operations. The recommended
final signal timing plans shall be reviewed for comments by the AUTHORITY and
agencies' staffs.
CONSULTANT shall evaluate signal timing and coordination parameters with
consideration for the following:
1. Review and verification of completed design documentation provided and
update the signal timing and coordination parameters as deemed
appropriate through review findings, field observations, etc.
2. Optimum coordination timing, lead/lag or lead/lead left -turn phasing as
deemed appropriate (except at Protected/Permissive locations, where
phasing will be lead/lead only), double or half cycling, and other such
techniques.
3. Timing parameters which provide adequate splits and corresponding
offsets which fully accommodate pedestrians within the split time.
Scope of Work 49 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall take into consideration the pedestrian timing
parameters used by the local agency on a case by case basis.
4. Timing parameters which incorporate minimal pedestrian activity to
provide the optimum vehicle split and offset timing and accommodate
pedestrians using various pedestrian timing adjustment techniques for
pedestrian splits during coordination.
5. Appropriate cycle lengths and signal groupings consistent with the goals
of this effort. Preliminary proposed cycle lengths and signal groupings
were developed by the previous consultant and presented to the agencies
for review and comment. All agency preliminary comments have been
addressed by the previous consultant. Additionally, the previous
consultant has recommended time -of -day start and stop intervals for the
various timing plans.
6. CONSULTANT shall update, at minimum, timing plans which consider the
following peak periods: a.m. peak, mid -day peak, p.m. peak and one
weekend peak. Timing plans shall be in both Synchro format and the
preferred timing chart format of each agency.
7. CONSULTANT shall update timing plans for a.m. peak, mid -day peak,
p.m. peak and a weekend peak based on the upcoming improvements for
the corridor as identified. Timing plans shall be in Synchro format and the
preferred timing chart format of each agency.
8. CONSULTANT shall review, verify, and update the previously prepared
Time -Space Diagrams for the synchronized segments along the BRT
Corridor.
Previous consultant prepared a Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan detailing
the signal timing optimization, including detail evaluation and recommendation on
the time -referencing system and analysis results. The Draft Signal Timing
Optimization Plan included, but was not limited to, the following:
a. Proposed cycle lengths and signal groupings by corridor and by agency
b. All Draft optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format, including (a) existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
programmed improvements (widening projects and intersection
improvements) within the next five years (after NTP).
c. Draft Time -Space diagrams for the synchronized segments along the BRT
Corridor.
The Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan was submitted to AUTHORITY and
agencies for review and comment. AUTHORITY has already provided their
review and all comments were addressed by the previous consultant.
Scope of Work 50 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
AUTHORITY shall provide a copy of all AUTHORITY comments and agency
comments received.
CONSULTANT shall coordinate and collect from all agencies the Draft Signal
Timing Optimization Plan comments. CONSULTANT shall incorporate
comments into the Final Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
Final Time -Space diagrams shall match those previously completed by previous
consultant and submitted to the agencies for review and comment. The Time -
Space diagrams shall be in color, be scaled both horizontally and vertically, show
vehicle splits and movements for each intersection, show offsets and
intersection distances listed below the intersections, and show forward and
reverse green bands with applicable phase sequences. The Time -Space
diagrams shall be separated per signal grouping and peak period plan and fully
annotated with proposed cycle lengths, travel direction, signal grouping zone
limits, and peak period plan identification. All intersections with crossing
coordination, half cycle lengths, and existing and proposed pedestrian overrides
shall be annotated as such on the Time -Space Diagrams. For a sample Draft
Time -Space Diagram completed by the previous consultant, see Reference
Documents — Attachment B.
AUTHORITY shall provide electronic copies of the following completed and
AUTHORITY approved Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Signal Timing
Optimization deliverables for CONSULTANT review and use:
1. All Draft optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format, including (a) existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
programmed improvements (widening projects and intersection
improvements) within the next five years (after NTP).
2. Draft Time -Space diagrams, in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format and Tru —
Traffic TS/PP data files.
3. Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan, in MS Word, MS Excel, and Adobe
Acrobat (PDF) format.
4. Electronic Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Draft analysis.
CONSULTANT shall submit a Final Signal Timing Implementation Plan to
AUTHORITY and agencies, which addresses all comments provided by
AUTHORITY and agencies in the Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Design deliverables (in part to include):
137a. All Final optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format and the preferred timing chart format of each agency, including (a)
existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and programmed
Scope of Work 51 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
improvements (widening projects and intersection improvements) within
the next five years (after NTP).
B7b. Final Time -Space diagrams.
137c. Final Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
B7d. Electronic Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Final analysis.
B7e. Electronic SimTraffic data files used in the Final analysis.
B7f. Electronic versions of the Final analysis and all data files including the Tru
— Traffic TS/PP files.
3.2.8 TASK B-8: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
CONSULTANT shall develop a schedule for meetings with AUTHORITY,
agencies, manufacturers, and others in order to facilitate the review/approval
process of the signal synchronization along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as directed by AUTHORITY and agencies
to discuss specific information and requirements related to the signal
synchronization along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
Meetings will also consist of any specific meeting called by AUTHORITY and
agencies, at which CONSULTANT's attendance is required.
It is required that in the TSS Design Phase, CONSULTANT, AUTHORITY, and
agencies (if available), conduct bi-weekly meetings in order to provide a
continuous dialogue and develop a team relationship for the success of this
project.
CONSULTANT shall prepare and distribute meeting minutes and action item
matrix to the project team prior to the next meeting. CONSULTANT shall provide
progress reports and schedules that will include completion and milestones for
each task including meetings. The progress report and schedule will be provided
to AUTHORITY on a monthly basis.
AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting agendas
for their review and written approval prior to the preparation of final meeting
agendas. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting
minutes for their review and written approval prior to the distribution of final
meeting minutes. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be invited and shall
participate at every meeting.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Design deliverables (in part to include):
Scope of Work 52 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
138a. Project Meeting Agendas.
B8b. Project Meeting Minutes and Action items.
B8c. Action Item Matrix.
3.3 PART "C" — WESTMINSTER/17th STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES
3.3.1 TASK C-1: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — KICK-OFF MEETING
CONSULTANT shall have a kick-off meeting with the AUTHORITY to discuss the
following:
1 . Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor alignment
2. List of arterial/collector roads
3. List of signalized intersections
4. Other projects along the Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor
5. Goals and objectives of the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS
6. Completed and remaining TSS Design Phase Project tasks
7. TSS analysis process
8. Review and approval coordination process
9. Project schedule, key milestones, and deliverables
3.3.2 TASK C-2: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — REVIEW COMPLETED TSS STUDY ALIGNMENT
VERIFICATION
Previous consultant reviewed the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor
signalized intersection list provided by the AUTHORITY and met with each
affected agency to verify the number of signalized intersections that would be
included on each arterial/collector road along the Westminster/17th Street BRT
Corridor.
Previous consultant completed Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS
Alignment Draft and Final Reports showing the study area including the
arterials/collector roads and the number of signalized intersections that were
synchronized as part of this project.
Scope of Work 53 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word and Adobe Acrobat
(PDF) format, of the completed AUTHORITY and agencies approved TSS
Alignment Final Report to the CONSULTANT for review and background
information.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable
as described in Section 3.3.6 to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed TSS Alignment Final Report review.
3.3.3 TASK C-3: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — COMPLETED DATA COLLECTION
Previous consultant collected all data necessary to thoroughly understand
existing traffic conditions along the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor to
facilitate the development of optimal time -of -day traffic signal synchronization
plans.
Previous consultant collected from the affected agencies the following:
1. Existing timing sheets
2. Existing synchronization plans
3. Existing synchronization zones
4. Traffic signal as -built drawings
5. Traffic signal communication as -built drawings
6. Traffic Management System as -built drawings
7. Aerial photos
8. Maps
Previous consultant also collected from affected agencies signal timing and
signal priority preferences, including, but not limited to, those related to
pedestrian and bicycle timing, leading and lagging left -turn phasing, and
conditional service, as well as the timing optimization software preference.
Previous consultant conducted all required seven-day 24-hour machine traffic
counts, and axle traffic counts at AUTHORITY approved locations. Data
obtained from Saturday traffic counts was used to determine the necessity of
weekend signal timing. Eighteen (18) machine traffic counts were collected for
the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor at approximately one -mile spacing.
Previous consultant conducted weekday peak period turning movement traffic
counts at all study intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle counts.
Scope of Work 54 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Weekday counts were conducted for two hours of each peak period (AM, mid-
day, and PM). Weekend turning movement traffic counts were conducted for a
single two-hour Saturday mid -day peak period.
Peak period turning movement traffic counts were collected at all 47 approved
signalized intersections along the Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor.
All traffic counts are summarized in MS Excel format. AUTHORITY shall provide
electronic copies of the raw data count sheets to the CONSULTANT along the
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor.
AUTHORITY shall provide electronic copies of the following completed and
AUTHORITY approved Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Data Collection
deliverables for CONSULTANT review and background information:
1. Report, in MS Word, MS Excel, and Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format,
summarizing data collection effort, including timing sheets, coordination
plans, coordination zones, as -built drawings, aerial photos, maps, traffic
collision analysis, and traffic collision diagrams.
2. 24-hour traffic counts, in MS Excel format, collected during the month of
October 2008.
3. Axle classification traffic counts, in MS Excel format, collected during the
month of October 2008.
4. Intersection peak period turning movement traffic counts, in MS Excel
format, collected in early November 2008 (prior to the Thanksgiving
holiday), late January 2009, and late May 2009.
For all existing signalized intersections in which existing signal timing is modified
or where new signalized intersections are constructed during the TSS Design
Finalization Phase, CONSULTANT shall collect from the respective agencies all
updated or new timing sheets and traffic signal as -built drawings for incorporation
into the Signal Timing Optimization task. Anticipated existing signal timing
modifications and new signalized intersections along the Westminster/17th Street
BRT Corridor include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Westminster Avenue at Beach Boulevard/SR-39 (signal timing
modification)
The anticipated existing signal timing modifications and new signalized
intersection locations listed above are for reference only and CONSULTANT
shall coordinate and verify with the respective agencies.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable
as described in Section 3.3.6 to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed Data Collection deliverables review.
Scope of Work 55 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
3.3.4 TASK C-4: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — COMPLETED INVENTORY OF EXISTING
TRAFFIC SIGNALS, FIELD MASTERS/HUBS LOCATIONS, SIGNAL
COMMUNICATIONS, AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Previous consultant reviewed the geometric layout, existing traffic signal
equipment, and identified any deficiencies (outdated controller
hardware/software, obsolete equipment, etc.) for each intersection along the
selected synchronized segments along the Westminster/17th Street BRT
Corridor.
The review included an assessment of the existing intersection geometry
(number of lanes, lane width, lane storage, crosswalks, etc.), traffic conditions,
and traffic signal control equipment along the Westminster/17th Street BRT
Corridor using observation, available as -built plans, consultation with the local
agencies, and agency aerial photos. With documented permission of the local
agencies, previous consultant inspected the interior of each traffic control cabinet
and made recommendations for equipment upgrades.
Previous consultant verified existing traffic signal communication systems along
the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor including equipment inside the signal
controller cabinets and reviewed field masters/hubs locations and equipment.
Previous consultant reviewed the agencies' traffic management system(s)
including hardware and software.
Previous consultant also identified all planned and programmed improvements
(widening projects, intersection improvements, etc.) on the selected
synchronized segments along the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor. The
identification of these projects included a list summarizing all improvements.
Key components of the completed corridor review included, but were not limited
to, the following:
1. Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor lane configurations and lane widths
2. Existing street and lane geometries, curbs, median, sidewalk width,
pedestrian ramps, etc.
3. Location of traffic control equipment at signalized intersections — poles,
controller cabinets, service cabinets, telephone service, detector loops,
existing service location connection, etc.
4. Traffic signs and pavement markings at intersections along the
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor and cross streets.
5. Traffic signal controller information, such as type of controller, brand and
make, condition of equipment.
Scope of Work 56 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
6. Existing signal operation characteristics — signal phasing, cycle lengths,
lead -lag, protective -permissive, etc.
7. Existing signal communication equipment.
8. Existing time -referencing setup.
9. Special characteristics such as proximity to adjacent intersections,
location of bus stops, location of driveways, parking prohibitions, and
other factors that may affect the efficiency of operation.
10. Photographed each intersection including location of signal controller
cabinet.
1 1 . Phot ographed the inside of each signal controller cabinet.
12. Note d any deficiencies of traffic control equipment at each intersection.
13. Note d the maintenance condition of the traffic signal equipment.
14. Existing preemption devices.
The field notes were prepared and approved by AUTHORITY.
Previous consultant noted factors that are expected to affect signal progression
including, but not limited to: intersections with high pedestrian or bicyclist
volumes; over -saturated intersections; uneven lane distribution; high volumes of
trucks and buses; high -volume un-signalized intersections, including
interchanges; parking maneuvers; location of bus stops; differing signal timing
patterns among agencies; etc.
Previous consultant identified any deficiencies of the existing traffic signal control
equipment (i.e. hardware, software) and geometric layout. Previous consultant
provided recommended solutions that may be implemented in order to correct
deficiencies and improve the traffic operations along the Westminster/17th Street
BRT Corridor. Recommendations provided include, but are not limited to,
replacement of traffic signal controller(s), software upgrades, installation of GPS
clocks, other traffic signal equipment upgrades/replacement, and geometric
layout improvements.
Previous consultant prepared a Field Inventory Report summarizing the findings
of the field review. The report contains photos and field review summary sheets
of each signalized intersection. The report is provided in sections in accordance
to each arterial along the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor.
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word, MS Visio, and Adobe
Acrobat (PDF) format, of the completed AUTHORITY and agencies approved
Scope of Work 57 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Field Inventory Report to the CONSULTANT for review and background
information.
CONSULTANT shall review and verify the following key components of the
completed corridor review by others:
1. Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor lane configurations
2. Existing street and lane geometries
3. Existing signal operation characteristics — signal phasing, cycle lengths,
lead -lag, protective -permissive, etc.
If any existing field inventory changes in the completed corridor review are
observed, CONSULTANT shall conduct all necessary field work and provide field
notes to correct and implement these changes into the TSS design finalization
phase. Before field work is conducted, all proposed field work locations shall be
presented to AUTHORITY for review and approval. All field notes shall be
prepared in a neat and readable format and approved by AUTHORITY in writing.
All field work shall be photographed and photos shall be provided to the
AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall identify any deficiencies in the existing traffic signal control
timing parameters or settings at each project intersection including: Pedestrian
Walk and Pedestrian Clearance intervals; Bicycle and/or Automobile/Truck timing
for Minimum Green; Yellow Change; and, All Red Clearance intervals as required
by the MUTCD, CA MUTCD, Traffic Operations Policy Directives (TOPD), or
enacted laws governing such issues. These deficiencies shall be submitted to
the AUTHORITY and the agencies for review and comment.
Each local agency shall be solely responsible for, and provide direction to
CONSULTANT and AUTHORITY in the methods and formulas used to calculate
the correct time settings for these respective timing intervals. These policies will
be on file with the AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable,
as described in Section 3.3.6, to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed Field Inventory Report review.
3.3.5 TASK C-5: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — COMPLETED WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET
BRT CORRIDOR "BEFORE" STUDY
Previous consultant conducted a "Before" field study report representative of the
times and days for which synchronization plans were developed. The report
identified Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) to evaluate the effects of the
synchronization plans. MOE's included traffic flow, travel time, average speed,
Scope of Work 58 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
stops, fuel consumption reduction, pollution reduction, and other pertinent items.
The identified MOE's were compiled for the corridor using the floating car method
and Synchro 7.0.
For the "Before" field study, previous consultant conducted a minimum of five (5)
floating car "runs" in each direction and during all periods in which
synchronization plans were developed.
The completed report addresses optimization strategies for signal
synchronization, specifically focusing on how to synchronize the
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor (i.e. end -to -end optimization and/or
coordinated zones). The report defines the traffic patterns along the
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor throughout the day and throughout the
week.
The analysis was based on all floating car data collected using a GPS device
and PC Travel software. AUTHORITY shall provide all PC Travel data files and
an electronic copy, in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format, of the PC Travel summary
reports for CONSULTANT review and background information. Previous
consultant prepared a "Before" Study Project Report and finalized the "Before"
Study Project Report based on comments received from the AUTHORITY.
AUTHORITY shall provide an electronic copy, in MS Word, MS Excel, and
Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format, of the completed and AUTHORITY approved
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor "Before Study" Project Report for
CONSULTANT review and background information.
CONSULTANT shall provide a section in the technical memorandum deliverable,
as described in Section 3.3.6 to AUTHORITY detailing the findings of the
completed "Before" Study Project Report review.
3.3.6 TASK C-6: WESTMINISTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — COMPLETED DESIGN PHASE
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW
CONSULTANT shall review all completed design phase documentation by others
listed above in Sections 3.3.2 through 3.3.5 and below in Section 3.3.7.
CONSULTANT shall prepare a technical memorandum detailing findings of the
design phase documentation review. The report shall contain, but not be limited
to, the following:
a. Review Findings
b. Deficiencies
c. Changes of Existing Field Conditions (lane configuration, signal phasing,
etc.)
d. Missing Information / Incomplete Information
Scope of Work 59 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
e. Information required to update the completed design phase
documentation by others
f. Recommendations Required to Complete the Remaining TSS Design
Finalization Tasks
The report shall be provided in sections in accordance to each design phase
document reviewed.
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS Design Finalization Services
deliverables (in part to include):
C6a. Technical memorandum detailing findings of the completed design phase
documentation review.
3.3.7 TASK C-7: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES — SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION
Previous consultant developed a Draft model of the study area approved by the
AUTHORITY. Previous consultant calibrated the draft model based on travel
time, delay studies, field observations of queue lengths, and saturation flows for
heavy movements at key intersections. CONSULTANT shall review, verify, and
update the previously prepared Draft model of the study area, as defined in this
task. Signal synchronization optimization shall be conducted in Synchro 7.0 and
optimization shall be augmented with Tru — Traffic TS/PP version 8.0.
If the CONSULTANT elects to use alternative methodologies to augment or
replace certain aspects of the Synchro model such as pre—processing of certain
data sets or split analysis, and/or other types of processes, the CONSULTANT
shall describe these operations in detail in the report with supporting
documentation as to why these processes were used in lieu of or in
augmentation to the Synchro model. These methodologies shall also be
described in detail in the CONSULTANT'S proposal for this project.
CONSULTANT shall develop an operational model within SimTraffic software.
The SimTraffic model will identify those local areas or portions of the project that
need special operational analysis of queue interactions such as starvation or
spillback. The operational analysis shall be used to supplement the "Before" and
"After" studies, to understand the effects of planned corridor improvements, fine
tune timing plans prior to implementation, and to analyze the additional
operational improvements as recommended by CONSULTANT. The entire
corridor does not have to be micro — simulated. Analysis shall be performed on
corridor segments that have queuing, starvation, spillback, or other problems
which can be mitigated by the SimTraffic program.
CONSULTANT shall develop final optimized signal timings using Synchro 7.0,
and recommend any changes to the signal phasing at each signalized
intersection that may improve the efficiency of operations. The recommended
Scope of Work 60 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
final signal timing plans shall be reviewed for comments by the AUTHORITY and
agencies' staffs.
CONSULTANT shall evaluate signal timing and coordination parameters with
consideration for the following:
1. Review and verification of completed design documentation provided and
update the signal timing and coordination parameters as deemed
appropriate through review findings, field observations, etc.
2. Optimum coordination timing, lead/lag or lead/lead left -turn phasing as
deemed appropriate (except at Protected/Permissive locations, where
phasing will be lead/lead only), double or half cycling, and other such
techniques.
3. Timing parameters which provide adequate splits and corresponding
offsets which fully accommodate pedestrians within the split time.
CONSULTANT shall take into consideration the pedestrian timing
parameters used by the local agency on a case by case basis.
4. Timing parameters which incorporate minimal pedestrian activity to
provide the optimum vehicle split and offset timing and accommodate
pedestrians using various pedestrian timing adjustment techniques for
pedestrian splits during coordination.
5. Appropriate cycle lengths and signal groupings consistent with the goals
of this effort. Preliminary proposed cycle lengths and signal groupings
were developed by the previous consultant and presented to the agencies
for review and comment. All agency preliminary comments have been
addressed by the previous consultant. Additionally, the previous
consultant has recommended time -of -day start and stop intervals for the
various timing plans.
6. CONSULTANT shall update, at minimum, timing plans which consider the
following peak periods: a.m. peak, mid -day peak, p.m. peak and one
weekend peak. Timing plans shall be in both Synchro format and the
preferred timing chart format of each agency.
7. CONSULTANT shall update timing plans for a.m. peak, mid -day peak,
p.m. peak and a weekend peak based on the upcoming improvements for
the corridor as identified. Timing plans shall be in Synchro format and the
preferred timing chart format of each agency.
8. CONSULTANT shall review, verify, and update the previously prepared
Time -Space Diagrams for the synchronized segments along the BRT
Corridor.
Scope of Work 61 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Previous consultant prepared a Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan detailing
the signal timing optimization, including detail evaluation and recommendation on
the time -referencing system and analysis results. The Draft Signal Timing
Optimization Plan included, but was not limited to, the following:
a. Proposed cycle lengths and signal groupings by corridor and by agency
b. All Draft optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format, including (a) existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
programmed improvements (widening projects and intersection
improvements) within the next five years (after NTP).
c. Draft Time -Space diagrams for the synchronized segments along the BRT
Corridor.
The Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan was submitted to AUTHORITY and
agencies for review and comment. AUTHORITY has already provided their
review and all comments were addressed by the previous consultant.
AUTHORITY shall provide a copy of all AUTHORITY comments and agency
comments received.
CONSULTANT shall coordinate and collect from all agencies the Draft Signal
Timing Optimization Plan comments. CONSULTANT shall incorporate
comments into the Final Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
Final Time -Space diagrams shall match those previously completed by previous
consultant and submitted to the agencies for review and comment. The Time -
Space diagrams shall be in color, be scaled both horizontally and vertically, show
vehicle splits and movements for each intersection, show offsets and
intersection distances listed below the intersections, and show forward and
reverse green bands with applicable phase sequences. The Time -Space
diagrams shall be separated per signal grouping and peak period plan and fully
annotated with proposed cycle lengths, travel direction, signal grouping zone
limits, and peak period plan identification. All intersections with crossing
coordination, half cycle lengths, and existing and proposed pedestrian overrides
shall be annotated as such on the Time -Space Diagrams. For a sample Draft
Time -Space Diagram completed by the previous consultant, see Reference
Documents — Attachment B.
AUTHORITY shall provide electronic copies of the following completed and
AUTHORITY approved Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Signal Timing
Optimization deliverables for CONSULTANT review and use:
All Draft optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format, including (a) existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
programmed improvements (widening projects and intersection
improvements) within the next five years (after NTP).
Scope of Work 62 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
2. Draft Time -Space diagrams, in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format and Tru —
Traffic TS/PP data files.
3. Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan, in MS Word, MS Excel, and Adobe
Acrobat (PDF) format.
4. Electronic Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Draft analysis.
CONSULTANT shall submit a Final Signal Timing Implementation Plan to
AUTHORITY and agencies, which addresses all comments provided by
AUTHORITY and agencies in the Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor TSS Design deliverables (in part to
include):
C7a. All Final optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro
format and the preferred timing chart format of each agency, including (a)
existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and programmed
improvements (widening projects and intersection improvements) within
the next five years (after NTP).
C7b. Final Time -Space diagrams.
C7c. Final Signal Timing Optimization Plan.
C7d. Electronic Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Final analysis.
C7e. Electronic SimTraffic data files used in the Final analysis.
C7f. Electronic versions of the Final analysis and all data files including the Tru
— Traffic TS/PP files.
3.3.8 TASK C-8: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS DESIGN
FINALIZATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
CONSULTANT shall develop a schedule for meetings with AUTHORITY,
agencies, manufacturers, and others in order to facilitate the review/approval
process of the signal synchronization along the Westminster/17th Street BRT
Corridor.
CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as directed by AUTHORITY and agencies
to discuss specific information and requirements related to the signal
synchronization along the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor.
Meetings will also consist of any specific meeting called by AUTHORITY and
agencies, at which CONSULTANT's attendance is required.
Scope of Work 63 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
It is required that in the TSS Design Phase, CONSULTANT, AUTHORITY, and
agencies (if available), conduct bi-weekly meetings in order to provide a
continuous dialogue and develop a team relationship for the success of this
project.
CONSULTANT shall prepare and distribute meeting minutes and action item
matrix to the project team prior to the next meeting. CONSULTANT shall provide
progress reports and schedules that will include completion and milestones for
each task including meetings. The progress report and schedule will be provided
to AUTHORITY on a monthly basis.
AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting agendas
for their review and written approval prior to the preparation of final meeting
agendas. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting
minutes for their review and written approval prior to the distribution of final
meeting minutes. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be invited and shall
participate at every meeting.
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS Design deliverables (in part to
include):
C8a. Project Meeting Agendas.
C8b. Project Meeting Minutes and Action items.
C8c. Action Item Matrix.
Scope of Work 64 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 4.0
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION IMPLEMENTATION
Scope of Work 65 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 4.0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION IMPLEMENTATION
4.1 TASK AND DELIVERABLE REQUIREMENTS
The TSS Implementation Phase, which includes but is not limited to, signal
timing implementation, furnishing of equipment, equipment installation, and
support services, is outlined in the following sections: Bristol/State College BRT
Corridor TSS Implementation Services (Part "A"), Harbor Boulevard BRT
Corridor TSS Implementation Services (Part "B"), and Westminster/17th Street
BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services (Part "C").
Electronic files of approved reports and planning documents shall be provided to
AUTHORITY (in format(s) as approved by AUTHORITY in writing).
CONSULTANT must conduct thorough quality control/quality assurance steps
prior to submitting deliverables, data, documents, and other related project
information to AUTHORITY for review. CONSULTANT shall submit four (4) hard
copies and four (4) electronic file copies (in a media as approved by
AUTHORITY in writing) of any and all reports, exhibits, plans, and documents.
4.2 PART "A" — BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
4.2.1 TASK A-1: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS SERVICES —
SIGNAL TIMING IMPLEMENTATION
CONSULTANT shall submit a Bristol/State College BRT Corridor technical
memorandum containing the field implementation of optimized traffic signal plans
for existing corridor conditions, including all required fine tuning and timing charts
as requested by AUTHORITY and agencies, and final signal timing
implementation plan to AUTHORITY and agencies within thirty (30) days of NTP
of the BRT corridors TSS Implementation Phase for written approval by
AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall submit four (4) hard copies and four (4) electronic copies (in
electronic media as approved by AUTHORITY in writing) of the Bristol/State
College BRT Corridor technical memorandum to AUTHORITY for written
approval prior to commencement of signal timing implementation.
Upon written approval of the optimized signal timings by AUTHORITY and
agencies, CONSULTANT shall implement, or assist agencies' staff in the
implementation of new signal timings at all signalized intersections except those
located within Caltrans District 12 jurisdiction either through: 1) the central traffic
signal system (if available) or, 2) direct implementation in the field traffic signal
controllers. Caltrans District 12 shall be responsible for the implementation of
new signal timings at all signalized intersections located within their jurisdiction.
Scope of Work 66 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall use existing traffic signal interconnection systems for signal
timing implementation. If interconnection systems do not exist, CONSULTANT
shall implement time -based signal coordination techniques within the jurisdiction.
CONSULTANT shall also implement time -based signal coordination techniques
across traffic signals controlled by different agencies to provide inter -jurisdictional
coordination.
The project will include the procurement of ten (1 O) new traffic signal controllers.
The specifications and final quantity of new controllers were determined during
the TSS Design Phase as a result of the previous consultant recommendations
and corresponding written approvals from AUTHORITY and agencies.
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the installation of traffic signal controllers
at all signalized intersections except those located within Caltrans District 12
jurisdiction. Caltrans District 12 shall be responsible for the installation of traffic
signal controllers at all signalized intersections located within their jurisdiction. At
no additional cost, CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the procurement and
delivery of the traffic signal controllers to locations approved by AUTHORITY in
writing.
As the project will be using time -based signal coordination, CONSULTANT shall
evaluate the current time -referencing of all traffic signal controllers and
recommend a corridor -wide strategy (such as GPS clocks) to ensure that all
traffic signal controllers are on synchronized time clocks. The specifications and
final quantity of new GPS clocks were determined during the TSS Design Phase
as a result of the previous consultant recommendations and corresponding
written approvals from AUTHORITY and agencies. At no additional cost,
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the procurement and installation of three
(3) GPS clocks at locations approved by AUTHORITY in writing.
Table 4-1 summarizes the time -reference equipment recommendations,
including new traffic signal controllers and GPS clocks, determined during the
TSS Design Phase that will be required for the Bristol/State College Boulevard
BRT Corridor.
Scope of Work 67 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 4-1
Bristol/State College Boulevard BRT Corridor
TSS Time -Reference Equipment Recommendations
Agency
Intersection
TSS Time -Reference Equipment
Recommendation
Arterial
Cross Street
State College Boulevard
Imperial Highway / SR-90
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
State College Boulevard
SR-91 WB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module, gps
State College Boulevard
SR-91 EB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
State College Boulevard
Orange Center Drive
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
State College Boulevard
Anaheim Blvd / I-5 NB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module,
cu — 170E TRFM, gps
Caltrans
State College Boulevard
I-5 SB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
La Veta Avenue
SR-22 WB On -Ramp / I-5 SB
Off -Ramp / I-5 NB to SR-22 WB
Connector Off -Ramp
cu — 170E TRFM, gps
Bristol Street
1-405 NB Off -Ramp
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
Bristol Street
I-405 SB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
Note: cu = controller unit; gps = gps time source receiver
CONSULTANT shall test all furnished traffic signal equipment (including
software) as required by AUTHORITY, Caltrans, agencies, equipment
manufacturer(s), and/or other similarly involved third parties prior to the
installation of any equipment (including software). If malfunctions, problems, or
other issues related to the testing of equipment are observed by the
CONSULTANT, the AUTHORITY shall be notified in writing within twenty-four
(24) hours.
Upon written authorization by the AUTHORITY, CONSULTANT shall procure
and install, or assist agency staff in installing, any devices that are part of the
time -referencing strategy. This may include devices installed at the agency
traffic management center or at traffic signal controller cabinets.
Agencies shall be responsible for local intersection inspection services on the
installation of field work and equipment. Agencies shall be responsible for the
inspection and installation of any central master, field master, controller units or
assemblies and any related communications systems with oversight by the
AUTHORITY. CONSULTANT shall work under the constraints of construction
specifications and standards of each local agency and Caltrans. Caltrans
personnel will be responsible for the removal and installation of any Caltrans
owned or operated intersection controller systems. CONSULTANT will be
responsible for all other intersection systems modifications, removal,
installations, etc.
CONSULTANT shall provide onsite assistance for turn -on of any new or modified
equipment.
Scope of Work 68 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall obtain all permits and pay all fees required by the agencies
necessitated by its operations for this SOW and no additional compensation for
fees will be allowed, therefore. CONSULTANT shall obtain all required
encroachment permits from Caltrans District 12. CONSULTANT shall pay any
and all Caltrans District 12 labor fees to install new and remove existing
equipment (controllers). CONSULTANT shall include all encroachment permit
costs in a lump sum price. AUTHORITY will not allow or approve any extra
costs. AUTHORITY will endeavor but not guarantee to have permit requirements
and associated fees removed or waived. All permits obtained shall be kept in a
readily available place on the job site at all times during equipment installation.
CONSULTANT shall fine-tune, or assist local agency staff in the fine-tuning of,
the new settings and timings. CONSULTANT shall fine-tune timings in the field
and record all changes. Fine-tuning shall be conducted during times and days
that are representative of the times and days for which coordination plans were
developed. Fine-tuning shall consist of, at a minimum, driving the Bristol/State
College BRT Corridor and visually verifying system operation relative to the
approved time -space diagrams provided during the TSS Design Phase.
Adjustments to offsets and splits shall be included as part of this task.
Upon final approval by the AUTHORITY and the respective agencies, one (1)
hard copy and one (1) electronic format timing chart, per intersection, shall be
provided to the respective agencies. One (1) timing chart per intersection, in
electronic format, shall be provided to the AUTHORITY. Timing sheets shall be
provided by CONSULTANT at time of turn on.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
Ala. Technical memorandum containing field implementation of optimized
traffic signal plans for existing corridor conditions, including all required
fine tuning and timing charts as requested by AUTHORITY and agency,
and final signal timing implementation plan.
The CONSULTANT shall complete all Bristol/State College Boulevard BRT
Corridor Signal Timing Implementation tasks prior to May 12, 2011.
4.2.2 TASK A-2: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES — EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT
CONSULTANT shall provide a list of materials, number of units, and prices for
the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Signal Synchronization, including traffic
signal equipment (traffic signal controllers, traffic signal controller software, and
GPS clocks), and associated equipment that will be procured and installed by the
CONSULTANT. AUTHORITY and the agencies shall review and AUTHORITY
shall approve in writing the list of materials, number of units, and prices prior to
ordering the equipment by CONSULTANT.
Scope of Work 69 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (to
in part include):
A2a. List of Materials, Units, and Prices.
A2b. Copies of All Purchase Orders and Product Manuals.
4.2.3 TASK A-3: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION SCHEDULING
OF WORK
CONSULTANT shall provide an equipment installation schedule for the
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor showing the activities, days, and locations
that the equipment will be installed and tested. The installation schedule shall
also indicate any implementation work that may be conducted by others at the
same intersections under separate projects.
CONSULTANT shall furnish AUTHORITY with four (4) hard copies and four (4)
electronic copies (in a media approved in writing by AUTHORITY) of a written
timetable showing the proposed schedule of work. The schedule of work shall
be submitted for approval to AUTHORITY and the agencies at least thirty (30)
days prior to the beginning of the equipment installation and shall be updated on
a monthly basis thereafter for the duration of the TSS Implementation Phase.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
A3a. Signal Synchronization Equipment Installation Schedule.
4.2.4 TASK A-4: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
COORDINATION, INSTALLATION MANPOWER, AND INSTALLATION
RESTRICTIONS
CONSULTANT shall coordinate installation, modification, and/or upgrade of
traffic signal equipment with the AUTHORITY and the agencies. CONSULTANT
shall coordinate the work of the various trades and crafts to avoid possible
interferences, duplication of work, or unfinished gaps, and conflicts between
operations. The various trades and crafts shall agree that, due to field
conditions, minor departures from the improvement plans are bound to occur,
and that such departures are self compensation so far as cost of additions or
deductions are concerned. No claims for extras or time extensions will be
allowed in connection with such minor changes due solely to field conditions.
It shall be construed that each subcontract is an integral part of the CONTRACT
and CONSULTANT shall provide and maintain, in full operation, at all times
during the performance of the CONTRACT, a "sufficient' crew of laborers,
Scope of Work 70 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
mechanics, inspectors, and foremen to execute the work with dispatch. All
implementation related efforts and operations shall be continuous and sustained.
The term "sufficient" is defined to mean to provide a crew equal to the work of
the various trades required by all parts of the project — whether simultaneously or
in the successive sequence of implementation — as soon as each is ready to be
performed so that no delays on any portion of the project shall occur.
To the extent possible, the work at the intersections shall be spaced such that
they would minimize potential traffic impacts.
CONSULTANT shall notify AUTHORITY, agencies, and utility companies of its
intent to begin work at least forty-eight (48) hours before work is begun.
CONSULTANT shall cooperate with AUTHORITY and agencies in handling
traffic through the work area.
If necessary, a traffic signal turn-off will require AUTHORITY and agencies'
written approval. Two (2) weeks prior to any turn-off of the traffic signals,
CONSULTANT shall coordinate with AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their
assigned representatives, of the anticipated schedule for the turn-off. Notice of
the scheduled signal turn-off shall be made to AUTHORITY and the agencies, or
their assigned representatives, in writing at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to
the signal turn-off.
CONSULTANT shall make arrangements with AUTHORITY and the agencies for
all traffic signal shutdowns. CONSULTANT shall provide all necessary signing
and traffic control devices for the traffic control prior to and during each traffic
signal turn-off.
Traffic signal work shall not commence until such time that CONSULTANT
notifies AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned representatives, in
writing of the date that all furnished materials and equipment are received, and
said work shall start within seven (7) days after said date.
No materials or equipment shall be stored at the job sites unless written
authorization is provided by AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned
representatives, authorizing said materials to be stored. The job sites shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly condition at all times. All equipment storage
and transport shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility.
Materials and equipment shall be stored so as not to create a public nuisance
and to insure the preservation of their quality and fitness for the work. No
materials or equipment shall be stored at the project site unless its use is
imminent.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
Scope of Work 71 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
A4a. Signal Synchronization Equipment AUTHORITY/agencies Notifications.
4.2.5 TASK A-5: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION GUARANTEE
CONSULTANT shall guarantee the entire work installed by it under this
CONTRACT and will fully meet all requirements as to quality of workmanship
and labor furnished by it. CONSULTANT shall make, at its own expense, any
repairs or replacements made necessary by defects in workmanship and labor
furnished by it that become evident within one (1) year after BRT Final
Acceptance of the work for all corridors and to restore to full compliance with the
requirements, any part of the work which during the one (1) year period is found
to be deficient with respect to any provision of the plans and specifications.
CONSULTANT shall make all repairs and replacements promptly upon receipt of
written orders from AUTHORITY or it assigned representative. If CONSULTANT
fails to make the repairs and replacements promptly, AUTHORITY or the agency
may do the work and CONSULTANT shall be liable to AUTHORITY and agency
for the cost.
Firmware and Software Upgrades for Control and Communications Systems for
Central, Field Master, and Local intersection controller units for installed specified
systems are included in the installed price for a period of 3 years.
New software for new features not originally installed nor specified is excluded
from this contract. Standard Warranties or Guarantees for new software or new
features are the responsibility of the agency receiving such equipment and the
standard warranties or guarantees supplied by the manufacturer or vendor.
Removal of existing equipment and appurtenances is included in the "removing,
reinstalling, or salvaging traffic signal equipment' installation price.
Attention is directed to:
Section 86 — 1.05 WARRANTIES, GUARANTIES, AND INSTRUCTION SHEETS
of the State Standard Specifications.
CONSULTANT shall provide a Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Signal
Synchronization Equipment Installation Guarantee Certification after
AUTHORITY issues Final Acceptance of all three (3) BRT corridors.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
A5a. Signal Synchronization Equipment Guarantee Certification.
4.2.6 TASK A-6: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - "AFTER STUDY"
Scope of Work 72 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall conduct an "After" field study report representative of the
times and days for which synchronization plans were developed. The "After"
Study must be conducted in the same manner and contain the same MOE's as
the "Before" Study in order to evaluate the improvements of the synchronization
plans. MOE's should be compiled for the optimized Bristol/State College BRT
Corridor using the floating car method (GPS interfaced PC Travel runs or Tru —
Traffic TS/PP runs) and Synchro 7.0. The "Before" Study floating car data was
collected using GPS interfaced PC Travel. If CONSULTANT decides to use
GPS interfaced Tru — Traffic TS/PP runs for the "After" study, CONSULTANT
must first present output compatibility between Tru — Traffic TS/PP and PC
Travel runs to the AUTHORITY for approval. For the "After" Study,
CONSULTANT shall conduct the same number of floating car 'runs' in each
direction during the same time periods as was done in the "Before" study.
The CONSULTANT shall provide a synchronized video with the "After" travel
time runs to augment the study. This video shall cover the entire length of the
corridor and concentrate on the most congested areas of the corridor around
freeways and high density commercial and business uses.
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Bristol/State College BRT Corridor "After" Study
Project Report detailing the results of the signal timing optimization and
implementation, time -referencing system, fine tuning components, and
comparing the results of the "Before" and "After" field study with reference to the
specific MOE's. CONSULTANT shall present the findings to the AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall also provide all floating car data results collected as part of
this task including, but not limited to, overall output statistics (distances, travel
time, number of stops, average speed compared to posted speed, total delay,
etc.), fuel consumption and emissions, speed/distance profiles, and time/space
trajectories of all runs shown on a per link / node basis. CONSULTANT shall
finalize the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor "After" Study Project Report based
on comments received from the AUTHORITY and agencies.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
A6a. "After" Study Project Report.
A6b. Electronic versions of the "After" Study analysis and all floating car data
files.
4.2.7 TASK A-7: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT REPORT
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Draft Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Final
Timings and Evaluation Technical Report, including an executive summary. The
report shall provide complete documentation of the project, including, but not
limited to, project objectives, project locations, project scope, findings,
Scope of Work 73 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
recommendations, implementation schedule, improvements accomplished,
furnished equipment test results, and procedures for continuing maintenance,
surveillance, and evaluation of the coordinated signal system, work performed,
data collected: "Before" and "After" studies and project benefits achieved in terms
of fuel savings, travel time, and other measurable parameters. The report shall
include graphical and table formats for each type of documentation for clarity
purposes. The report shall also equate or quantify any savings in travel time,
reduction in delay and emissions with type of emissions measured into a
monetary figure consistent with current publications. Report formats, including
style and content of graphs and tables, shall be approved by the AUTHORITY
prior to submission.
The report shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor as well as recommendations for further
infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal
coordination project results. CONSULTANT shall present the final report and
results of the project to the AUTHORITY and city councils as required by
AUTHORITY in writing.
The report shall include for each intersection: lane configurations, signal phasing,
turning movement data, and cycle lengths for existing and proposed timings for
all peak periods. In addition, in a separate binder, all traffic signal phase
sequences, signal timing plans, and pedestrian timings shall be documented.
Finally, the report shall provide recommendations, including cost and benefit
estimates, for future improvements to traffic signal infrastructure (signal
controllers, vehicle detection, communications, etc.), intersection capacity
(appropriate signal phasing, lane geometrics, and alleviation of physical
bottlenecks that curtail arterial capacity), and traffic management strategies.
CONSULTANT shall submit a Final Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Final
Timings and Evaluation Technical Report to AUTHORITY and agencies which
addresses all comments provided by AUTHORITY and agencies in the Draft
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation Technical
Report.
The Report format shall consist of a Table of Contents, Executive Summary, with
technical appendices giving the Background, Methodologies, Before Conditions,
After Conditions, Before and After Analysis and Study Results, Elements of
Implementation, Special Demonstration of Equipment and Results, Conclusions,
Recommendations and Lessons Learned, followed by Appendices. As each
corridor has unique properties and functionality, prior to the Report being written,
the CONSULTANT shall meet with the AUTHORITY to discuss format and
content for each of the respective corridors.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
Scope of Work 74 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Ala. Draft Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation
Technical Report.
Alb. Final Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation
Technical Report.
A7c. Presentations to the AUTHORITY and City Councils.
4.2.8 TASK A-8: BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
CONSULTANT shall develop a schedule for meetings with AUTHORITY,
agencies, manufacturers, and others in order to facilitate the TSS
Implementation Phase along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor.
CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as directed by AUTHORITY and/or
agencies to discuss specific information and requirements related to the signal
synchronization along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor.
Meetings will also consist of any specific meeting called by AUTHORITY and/or
agencies, at which CONSULTANT's attendance is required.
CONSULTANT shall prepare and distribute meeting minutes and action item
matrix (Deliverable) to the project team five (5) days after meeting.
AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting agendas
for their review and written approval prior to the preparation of final meeting
agendas. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting
minutes for their review and written approval prior to the distribution of final
meeting minutes. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be invited and shall
participate at every meeting.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
A8a. Project Meeting Agendas.
A8b. Project Meeting Minutes and Action items.
A8c. Action Item Matrix.
4.3 PART "B" — HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
4.3.1 TASK B-1: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES — SIGNAL TIMING IMPLEMENTATION
CONSULTANT shall submit a Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor technical
memorandum containing the field implementation of optimized traffic signal plans
Scope of Work 75 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
for existing corridor conditions, including all required fine tuning and timing charts
as requested by AUTHORITY and agencies, and final signal timing
implementation plan to AUTHORITY and agencies within sixty (60) days of NTP
of the BRT corridors TSS Implementation Phase for written approval by
AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall submit four (4) hard copies and four (4) electronic copies (in
electronic media as approved by AUTHORITY in writing) of the Harbor Boulevard
BRT Corridor Draft and Final Signal Timing Implementation Plans to
AUTHORITY for written approval prior to commencement of signal timing
implementation.
Upon written approval of the optimized signal timings by AUTHORITY and
agencies, CONSULTANT shall implement, or assist local agencies' staff in the
implementation of new signal timings at all signalized intersections except those
located within Caltrans District 12 jurisdiction either through: 1) the central traffic
signal system (if available) or, 2) direct implementation in the field traffic signal
controllers. Caltrans District 12 shall be responsible for the implementation of
new signal timings at all signalized intersections located within their jurisdiction.
CONSULTANT shall use existing traffic signal interconnection systems for signal
timing implementation. If interconnection systems do not exist, CONSULTANT
shall implement time -based signal coordination techniques within the jurisdiction.
CONSULTANT shall also implement time -based signal coordination techniques
across traffic signals controlled by different agencies to provide inter -jurisdictional
coordination.
The project will include the procurement of thirteen (13) new traffic signal
controllers. The specifications and final quantity of new controllers were
determined during the TSS Design Phase as a result of the previous consultant
recommendations and corresponding written approvals from AUTHORITY and
agencies. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the installation of traffic signal
controllers at all signalized intersections except those located within Caltrans
District 12 jurisdiction. Caltrans District 12 shall be responsible for the
installation of traffic signal controllers at all signalized intersections located within
their jurisdiction. At no additional cost, CONSULTANT shall be responsible for
the procurement and delivery of the traffic signal controllers to locations
approved by AUTHORITY in writing.
As the project will be using time -based signal coordination, CONSULTANT shall
evaluate the current time -referencing of all traffic signal controllers and
recommend a corridor -wide strategy (such as GPS clocks) to ensure that all
traffic signal controllers are on synchronized time clocks. The specifications and
final quantity of new GPS clocks were determined during the TSS Design Phase
as a result of the previous consultant recommendations and corresponding
written approvals from AUTHORITY and agencies. At no additional cost,
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the procurement and installation of six
(6) GPS clocks at locations approved by AUTHORITY in writing.
Scope of Work 76 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Table 4-2 summarizes the time -reference equipment recommendations,
including new traffic signal controllers and GPS clocks, determined during the
TSS Design Phase that will be required for the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
Scope of Work 77 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 4-2
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor
TSS Time -Reference EauiDment Recommendations
Agency
Intersection
Arterial
Cross Street
YSS "Time-kelference Equipment
Recommendation
Chapman Avenue (North)
SR-57 NB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module, gps
Chapman Avenue (North)
SR-57 SB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
Harbor Boulevard
SR-91 WB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module, gps
Harbor Boulevard
SR-91 EB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
Harbor Boulevard
I-5 NB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module,
cu - 170E TRFM, gps
Harbor Boulevard
I-5 SB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
Harbor Boulevard
SR-22 WB Off -Ramp / Banner Drive
cu - 170E TRFM, gps
Caltrans
Trask Avenue
SR-22 EB Ramps
cu - 170E TRFM, gps
Harbor Boulevard
I-405 NB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
Harbor Boulevard
I-405 SB Ramps
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
Newport Blvd
Harbor Boulevard
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module
Newport Blvd
19th Street
cu - 2070 w/ 6A telemetry module,
gps (at the Caltrans field master controller
located at the blockhouse on Newport
Boulevard north of 19th Street)
Note: cu = controller unit: gps = gps time source receiver
CONSULTANT shall test all furnished traffic signal equipment (including
software) as required by AUTHORITY, Caltrans, agencies, and equipment
manufacturer(s) prior to the installation of any equipment (including software)
and provide AUTHORITY with results in writing. If malfunctions, problems, or
other issues related to the testing of equipment are observed by the
CONSULTANT, the AUTHORITY shall be notified in writing within twenty-four
(24) hours.
Upon written authorization by the AUTHORITY, CONSULTANT shall procure
and install, or assist local agency staff in installing, any devices that are part of
the time -referencing strategy. This may include devices installed at the agency
traffic management center or at traffic signal controller cabinets.
Agencies shall be responsible for local intersection inspection services on the
installation of field work and equipment. Agencies shall be responsible for the
inspection and installation of any central master, field master, controller units or
assemblies and any related communications systems with oversight by the
AUTHORITY. CONSULTANT shall work under the constraints of construction
specifications and standards of each local agency and Caltrans. Caltrans
personnel will be responsible for the removal and installation of any Caltrans
owned or operated intersection controller systems. CONSULTANT will be
responsible for all other intersection systems modifications, removal,
installations, etc.
Scope of Work 78 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall provide onsite assistance for turn -on of any new or modified
equipment.
CONSULTANT shall obtain all permits and pay all fees required by the agencies
necessitated by its operations for this SOW and no additional compensation for
fees will be allowed, therefore. CONSULTANT shall obtain all required
encroachment permits from Caltrans District 12. CONSULTANT shall pay any
and all Caltrans District 12 labor fees to install new and remove existing
equipment (controllers). CONSULTANT shall include all encroachment permit
costs in a lump sum price. AUTHORITY will not allow or approve any extra
costs. AUTHORITY will endeavor but not guarantee to have permit requirements
and associated fees removed or waived. All permits obtained shall be kept in a
readily available place on the job site at all times during equipment installation.
CONSULTANT shall fine-tune, or assist local agency staff in the fine-tuning of,
the new settings and timings. CONSULTANT shall fine-tune timings in the field
and record all changes. Fine-tuning shall be conducted during times and days
that are representative of the times and days for which coordination plans were
developed. Fine-tuning shall consist of, at a minimum, driving the Harbor
Boulevard BRT Corridor and visually verifying system operation relative to the
approved time -space diagrams provided during the TSS Design Phase.
Adjustments to offsets and splits shall be included as part of this task.
Upon final approval by the AUTHORITY and the respective agencies, one (1)
hard copy and one (1) electronic format timing chart, per intersection, shall be
provided to the respective agencies. One (1) timing chart per intersection, in
electronic format, shall be provided to the AUTHORITY. Timing sheets shall be
provided by CONSULTANT at time of turn on.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
B1a. Technical memorandum containing field implementation of optimized
traffic signal plans for existing corridor conditions, including all required
fine tuning and timing charts as requested by AUTHORITY and agency,
and final signal timing implementation plan.
The CONSULTANT shall complete all Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Signal
Timing Implementation tasks prior to May 12, 2011.
4.3.2 TASK B-2: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES — EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT
CONSULTANT shall provide a list of materials, number of units, and prices for
the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Signal Synchronization, including traffic
signal equipment (traffic signal controllers, traffic signal controller software, and
Scope of Work 79 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
GPS clocks), and associated equipment that will be procured and installed by the
CONSULTANT. AUTHORITY and the agencies shall review and AUTHORITY
shall approve in writing the list of materials, number of units, and prices prior to
ordering the equipment by CONSULTANT.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
B2a. List of Materials, Units, and Prices.
B2b. Copies of All Purchase Orders and Product Manuals.
4.3.3 TASK B-3: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES— EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION SCHEDULING OF WORK
CONSULTANT shall provide an equipment installation schedule for the Harbor
Boulevard BRT Corridor showing the activities, days, and locations that the
equipment will be installed and . tested. The installation schedule shall also
indicate any implementation work that may be conducted by others at the same
intersections under separate projects.
CONSULTANT shall furnish AUTHORITY with four (4) hard copies and four (4)
electronic copies (in a media approved in writing by AUTHORITY) of a written
timetable showing the proposed schedule of work. The schedule of work shall
be submitted for approval to AUTHORITY and the agencies at least thirty (30)
days prior to the beginning of the equipment installation and shall be updated on
a monthly basis thereafter for the duration of the TSS Implementation Phase.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
B3a. Signal Synchronization Equipment Installation Schedule.
4.3.4 TASK B-4: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION COORDINATION, INSTALLATION
MANPOWER, AND INSTALLATION RESTRICTIONS
CONSULTANT shall coordinate installation, modification, and/or upgrade of
traffic signal equipment with the AUTHORITY and the agencies. CONSULTANT
shall coordinate the work of the various trades and crafts to avoid possible
interferences, duplication of work, or unfinished gaps, and conflicts between
operations. The various trades and crafts shall agree that, due to field
conditions, minor departures from the improvement plans are bound to occur,
and that such departures are self compensation so far as cost of additions or
deductions are concerned. No claims for extras or time extensions will be
allowed in connection with such minor changes due solely to field conditions.
Scope of Work 80 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
It shall be construed that each subcontract is an integral part of the CONTRACT
and CONSULTANT shall provide and maintain, in full operation, at all times
during the performance of the CONTRACT, a "sufficient" crew of laborers,
mechanics, inspectors, and foremen to execute the work with dispatch. All
implementation related efforts and operations shall be continuous and sustained.
The term "sufficient" is defined to mean to provide a crew equal to the work of
the various trades required by all parts of the project — whether simultaneously or
in the successive sequence of implementation — as soon as each is ready to be
performed so that no delays on any portion of the project shall occur.
To the extent possible, the work at the intersections shall be spaced such that
they would minimize potential traffic impacts.
CONSULTANT shall notify AUTHORITY, agencies, and utility companies of its
intent to begin work at least thirty-six (36) hours before work is begun.
CONSULTANT shall cooperate with AUTHORITY and agencies in handling
traffic through the work area.
If necessary, a traffic signal turn-off will require agencies' approval. Two (2)
weeks prior to any turn-off of the traffic signals, CONSULTANT shall coordinate
with AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned representatives, of the
anticipated schedule for the turn-off. Notice of the scheduled signal turn-off shall
be made to AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned representatives, in
writing at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the signal turn-off.
CONSULTANT shall make arrangements with AUTHORITY and the agencies for
all traffic signal shutdowns. CONSULTANT shall provide all necessary signing
and traffic control devices for the traffic control prior to and during each traffic
signal turn-off.
Traffic signal work shall not commence until such time that CONSULTANT
notifies AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned representatives, in
writing of the date that all furnished materials and equipment are received, and
said work shall start within seven (7) days after said date.
No materials or equipment shall be stored at the job sites unless written
authorization is provided by AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned
representatives, authorizing said materials to be stored. The job sites shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly condition at all times. All equipment storage
and transport shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility.
Materials and equipment shall be stored so as not to create a public nuisance
and to insure the preservation of their quality and fitness for the work. No
materials or equipment shall be stored at the project site unless its use is
imminent.
Scope of Work 81 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
134a. Signal Synchronization Equipment AUTHORITY/agencies Notifications.
4.3.5 TASK B-5: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION GUARANTEE
CONSULTANT shall guarantee the entire work installed by it under this
CONTRACT and will fully meet all requirements as to quality of workmanship
and labor furnished by it. CONSULTANT shall make, at its own expense, any
repairs or replacements made necessary by defects in workmanship and labor
furnished by it that become evident within one (1) year after BRT Final
Acceptance of the work for all corridors and to restore to full compliance with the
requirements, any part of the work which during the one (1) year period is found
to be deficient with respect to any provision of the plans and specifications.
CONSULTANT shall make all repairs and replacements promptly upon receipt of
written orders from AUTHORITY or it assigned representative. If CONSULTANT
fails to make the repairs and replacements promptly, AUTHORITY or the agency
may do the work and CONSULTANT shall be liable to AUTHORITY and agency
for the cost.
Firmware and Software Upgrades for Control and Communications Systems for
Central, Field Master, and Local intersection controller units for installed specified
systems are included in the installed price for a period of 3 years.
New software for new features not originally installed nor specified is excluded
from this contract. Standard Warranties or Guarantees for new software or new
features are the responsibility of the agency receiving such equipment and the
standard warranties or guarantees supplied by the manufacturer or vendor.
Removal of existing equipment and appurtenances is included in the "removing,
reinstalling, or salvaging traffic signal equipment" installation price.
Attention is directed to:
Section 86 — 1.05 WARRANTIES, GUARANTIES, AND INSTRUCTION SHEETS
of the State Standard Specifications.
CONSULTANT shall provide a Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Signal
Synchronization Equipment Installation Guarantee Certification after
AUTHORITY issues Final Acceptance of all three (3) BRT corridors.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
135a. Signal Synchronization Equipment Guarantee Certification.
Scope of Work 82 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
4.3.6 TASK B-6: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES - "AFTER STUDY"
CONSULTANT shall conduct an "After" field study report representative of the
times and days for which synchronization plans were developed. The "After"
Study must be conducted in the same manner and contain the same MOE's as
the "Before" Study in order to evaluate the improvements of the synchronization
plans. MOE's should be compiled for the optimized Harbor Boulevard BRT
Corridor using the floating car method (GPS interfaced PC Travel runs or Tru-
Traffic TS/PP runs) and Synchro 7.0. The "Before" Study floating car data was
collected using GPS interfaced PC Travel. If CONSULTANT decides to use
GPS interfaced Tru — Traffic TS/PP runs for the "After" study, CONSULTANT
must first present output compatibility between Tru — Traffic TS/PP and PC
Travel runs to the AUTHORITY for approval. For the "After" Study,
CONSULTANT shall conduct the same number of floating car 'runs' in each
direction during the same time periods as was done in the "Before" study.
The CONSULTANT shall provide a synchronized video with the "After" travel
time runs to augment the study. This video shall cover the entire length of the
corridor and concentrate on the most congested areas of the corridor around
freeways and high density commercial and business uses.
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor "After" Study
Project Report detailing the results of the signal timing optimization and
implementation, time -referencing system, fine tuning components, and
comparing the results of the "Before" and "After" field study with reference to the
specific MOE's. CONSULTANT shall present the findings to the AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall also provide all floating car data results collected as part of
this task including, but not limited to, overall output statistics (distances, travel
time, number of stops, average speed compared to posted speed, total delay,
etc.), fuel consumption and emissions, speed/distance profiles, and time/space
trajectories of all runs shown on a per link / node basis. CONSULTANT shall
finalize the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor "After" Study Project Report based
on comments received from the AUTHORITY and agencies.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
136a. "After" Study Project Report.
B6b. Electronic versions of the "After" Study analysis and all floating car data
files.
4.3.7 TASK B-7: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES - PROJECT REPORT
Scope of Work 83 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Draft Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Final
Timings and Evaluation Technical Report, including an executive summary. The
report shall provide complete documentation of the project, including, but not
limited to, project objectives, project locations, project scope, findings,
recommendations, implementation schedule, improvements accomplished,
furnished equipment test results, and procedures for continuing maintenance,
surveillance, and evaluation of the coordinated signal system, work performed,
data collected: "Before" and "After" studies and project benefits achieved in terms
of fuel savings, travel time, and other measurable parameters. The report shall
include graphical and table formats for each type of documentation for clarity
purposes. The report shall also equate or quantify any savings in travel time,
reduction in delay and emissions with type of emissions measured into a
monetary figure consistent with current publications. Report formats, including
style and content of graphs and tables, shall be approved by the AUTHORITY
prior to submission.
The report shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor as well as recommendations for further
infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal
coordination project results. CONSULTANT shall present the final report and
results of the project to the AUTHORITY and city councils as required by
AUTHORITY in writing.
The report shall include for each intersection: lane configurations, signal phasing,
turning movement data, and cycle lengths for existing and proposed timings for
all peak periods. In addition, in a separate binder, all traffic signal phase
sequences, signal timing plans, and pedestrian timings shall be documented.
Finally, the report shall provide recommendations, including cost and benefit
estimates, for future improvements to traffic signal infrastructure (signal
controllers, vehicle detection, communications, etc.), intersection capacity
(appropriate signal phasing, lane geometrics, and alleviation of physical
bottlenecks that curtail arterial capacity), and traffic management strategies.
CONSULTANT shall submit a Final Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Final
Timings and Evaluation Technical Report to AUTHORITY and agencies which
addresses all comments provided by AUTHORITY and agencies in the Draft
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation Technical Report.
The Report format shall consist of a Table of Contents, Executive Summary, with
technical appendices giving the Background, Methodologies, Before Conditions,
After Conditions, Before and After Analysis and Study Results, Elements of
Implementation, Special Demonstration of Equipment and Results, Conclusions,
Recommendations and Lessons Learned, followed by Appendices. As each
corridor has unique properties and functionality, prior to the Report being written,
the CONSULTANT shall meet with the AUTHORITY to discuss format and
content for each of the respective corridors.
Scope of Work 84 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
B7a. Draft Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation
Technical Report.
67b. Final Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation
Technical Report.
B7c. Presentations to the AUTHORITY and City Councils.
Scope of Work 85 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
4.3.8 TASK B-8: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
CONSULTANT shall develop a schedule for meetings with AUTHORITY,
agencies, manufacturers, and others in order to facilitate the TSS
Implementation Phase along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as directed by AUTHORITY and/or
agencies to discuss specific information and requirements related to the signal
synchronization along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor.
Meetings will also consist of any specific meeting called by AUTHORITY and/or
agencies, at which CONSULTANT's attendance is required.
CONSULTANT shall prepare and distribute meeting minutes and action item
matrix (Deliverable) to the project team five (5) days after meeting.
AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting agendas
for their review and written approval prior to the preparation of final meeting
agendas. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting
minutes for their review and written approval prior to the distribution of final
meeting minutes. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be invited and shall
participate at every meeting.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
138a. Project Meeting Agendas.
B8b. Project Meeting Minutes and Action items.
138c. Action Item Matrix.
4.4 PART "C" — WESTMINSTER/17th STREET BRT TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES
4.4.1 TASK C-1: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES — SIGNAL TIMING IMPLEMENTATION
CONSULTANT shall submit a Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor technical
memorandum containing the field implementation of optimized traffic signal plans
for existing corridor conditions, including all required fine tuning and timing charts
as requested by AUTHORITY and agencies, and final signal timing
implementation plan to AUTHORITY and agencies within sixty (60) days of NTP
of the BRT Corridors TSS Implementation Phase for written approval by
AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall submit four (4) hard copies and four (4) electronic copies (in
electronic media as approved by AUTHORITY in writing) of the Westminster/17th
Scope of Work 86 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Street BRT Corridor Draft and Final Signal Timing Implementation Plans to
AUTHORITY for written approval prior to commencement of signal timing
implementation.
Upon written approval of the optimized signal timings by AUTHORITY, and
agencies, CONSULTANT shall implement, or assist local agencies' staff in the
implementation of, new signal timings at all signalized intersections except those
located within Caltrans District 12 jurisdiction either through: 1) the central traffic
signal system (if available) or, 2) direct implementation in the field traffic signal
controllers. Caltrans District 12 shall be responsible for the implementation of
new signal timings at all signalized intersections located within their jurisdiction.
CONSULTANT shall use existing traffic signal interconnection systems for signal
timing implementation. If interconnection systems do not exist, CONSULTANT
shall implement time -based signal coordination techniques within the jurisdiction.
CONSULTANT shall also implement time -based signal coordination techniques
across traffic signals controlled by different agencies to provide inter -jurisdictional
coordination.
The project will include the procurement of new traffic signal controllers. The
specifications and final quantity of new controllers were determined during the
TSS Design Phase, as a result of the previous consultant recommendations and
corresponding written approvals from AUTHORITY and agencies.
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the installation of traffic signal controllers
at all signalized intersections except those located within Caltrans District 12
jurisdiction. Caltrans District 12 shall be responsible for the installation of traffic
signal controllers at all signalized intersections located within their jurisdiction. At
no additional cost, CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the procurement and
delivery of the traffic signal controllers to locations approved by AUTHORITY in
writing.
As the project will be using time -based signal coordination, CONSULTANT shall
evaluate the current time -referencing of all traffic signal controllers and
recommend a corridor -wide strategy (such as GPS clocks) to ensure that all
traffic signal controllers are on synchronized time clocks. The specifications and
final quantity of new GPS clocks were determined during the TSS Design Phase,
as a result of the previous consultant recommendations and corresponding
written approvals from AUTHORITY and agencies. At no additional cost,
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the procurement and installation of two
(2) GPS clocks at locations approved by AUTHORITY in writing.
Table 4-3 summarizes the time -reference equipment recommendations,
including new traffic signal controllers and GPS clocks, determined during the
TSS Design Phase that will be required for the Westminster/17t" Street BRT
Corridor.
Scope of Work 87 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 4-3
Westminster/17� S�BRT Corridor
TSS Time -Reference E ui ment Recommendations
Agency
Intersection
TSS Tang -Reference Equipment
Arterial
Cross Street 7Recommeandatiton
Caltrans
17th Street
I-5 NB Ramps / Santiago Street
gps
Carden Grove
Westminster Avenue
Roxey Street
gps
Note: gps = gps time source receiver
CONSULTANT shall test all furnished traffic signal equipment (including
software) as required by AUTHORITY, Caltrans, agencies, and equipment
manufacturer(s) prior to the installation of any equipment (including software). If
malfunctions, problems, or other issues related to the testing of equipment are
observed by the CONSULTANT, the AUTHORITY shall be notified in writing
within twenty-four (24) hours.
Upon written authorization by the AUTHORITY, CONSULTANT shall procure
and install, or assist local agency staff in installing, any devices that are part of
the time -referencing strategy. This may include devices installed at the agency
traffic management center or at traffic signal controller cabinets.
Agencies shall be responsible for local intersection inspection services on the
installation of field work and equipment. Agencies shall be responsible for the
inspection and installation of any central master, field master, controller units or
assemblies and any related communications systems with oversight by the
AUTHORITY. CONSULTANT shall work under the constraints of construction
specifications and standards of each local agency and Caltrans. Caltrans
personnel will be responsible for the removal and installation of any Caltrans
owned or operated intersection controller systems. CONSULTANT will be
responsible for all other intersection systems modifications, removal,
installations, etc.
CONSULTANT shall provide onsite assistance for turn -on of any new or modified
equipment.
CONSULTANT shall obtain all permits and pay all fees required by the agencies
necessitated by its operations for this SOW and no additional compensation for
fees will be allowed, therefore. CONSULTANT shall obtain all required
encroachment permits from Caltrans District 12. CONSULTANT shall pay any
and all Caltrans District 12 labor fees to install new and remove existing
equipment (controllers). CONSULTANT shall include all encroachment permit
costs in a lump sum price. AUTHORITY will not allow or approve any extra
costs. AUTHORITY will endeavor but not guarantee to have permit requirements
and associated fees removed or waived. All permits obtained shall be kept in a
readily available place on the job site at all times during equipment installation.
Scope of Work 88 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall fine-tune, or assist local agency staff in the fine-tuning of,
the new settings and timings. CONSULTANT shall fine-tune timings in the field
and record all changes. Fine-tuning shall be conducted during times and days
that are representative of the times and days for which coordination plans were
developed. Fine-tuning shall consist of, at a minimum, driving the
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor and visually verifying system operation
relative to the approved time -space diagrams provided during the TSS Design
Phase. Adjustments to offsets and splits shall be included as part of this task.
Upon final approval by the AUTHORITY and the respective agencies, one (1)
hard copy and one (1) electronic format timing chart, per intersection, shall be
provided to the respective agencies. One (1) timing chart per intersection, in
electronic format, shall be provided to the AUTHORITY. Timing sheets shall be
provided by CONSULTANT at time of turn on.
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(in part to include):
C1a. Technical memorandum containing field implementation of optimized
traffic signal plans for existing corridor conditions, including all required
fine tuning and timing charts as requested by AUTHORITY and agency,
and final signal timing implementation plan.
The CONSULTANT shall complete all Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor
Signal Timing Implementation tasks prior to May 12, 2011.
4.4.2 TASK C-2: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES — EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT
CONSULTANT shall provide a list of materials, number of units, and prices for
the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Signal Synchronization, including
traffic signal equipment (traffic signal controllers, traffic signal controller software,
and GPS clocks), and associated equipment that will be procured and installed
by the CONSULTANT. AUTHORITY and the agencies shall review and
AUTHORITY shall approve in writing the list of materials, number of units, and
prices prior to ordering the equipment by CONSULTANT.
Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(to in part include):
C2a. List of Materials, Units, and Prices.
C2b. Copies of All Purchase Orders and Product Manuals.
4.4.3 TASK C-3: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT TSS IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION SCHEDULING OF WORK
Scope of Work 89 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall provide equipment installation schedule for the
Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor showing the activities, days, and locations
that the equipment will be installed and tested. The installation schedule shall
also indicate any implementation work that may be conducted by others at the
same intersections under separate projects.
CONSULTANT shall furnish AUTHORITY with four (4) hard copies and four (4)
electronic copies (in a media approved in writing by AUTHORITY) of a written
timetable showing the proposed schedule of work. The schedule of work shall
be submitted for approval to AUTHORITY and the agencies at least thirty (30)
days prior to the beginning of the equipment installation and shall be updated on
a monthly basis thereafter for the duration of the TSS Implementation Phase.
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(in part to include):
C3a. Signal Synchronization Equipment Installation Schedule.
4.4.4 TASK C-4: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
COORDINATION, INSTALLATION MANPOWER, AND INSTALLATION
RESTRICTIONS
CONSULTANT shall coordinate installation, modification, and/or upgrade of
traffic signal equipment with the AUTHORITY and the agencies. CONSULTANT
shall coordinate the work of the various trades and crafts to avoid possible
interferences, duplication of work, or unfinished gaps, and conflicts between
operations. The various trades and crafts shall agree that, due to field
conditions, minor departures from the improvement plans are bound to occur,
and that such departures are self compensation so far as cost of additions or
deductions are concerned. No claims for extras or time extensions will be
allowed in connection with such minor changes due solely to field conditions.
It shall be construed that each subcontract is an integral part of the CONTRACT
and CONSULTANT shall provide and maintain, in full operation, at all times
during the performance of the CONTRACT, a "sufficient' crew of laborers,
mechanics, inspectors, and foremen to execute the work with dispatch. All
implementation related efforts and operations shall be continuous and sustained.
The term "sufficient' is defined to mean to provide a crew equal to the work of
the various trades required by all parts of the project — whether simultaneously or
in the successive sequence of implementation — as soon as each is ready to be
performed so that no delays on any portion of the project shall occur.
To the extent possible, the work at the intersections shall be spaced such that
they would minimize potential traffic impacts.
Scope of Work 90 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT shall notify AUTHORITY, agencies, and utility companies of its
intent to begin work at least thirty-six (36) hours before work is begun.
CONSULTANT shall cooperate with AUTHORITY and agencies in handling
traffic through the work area.
If necessary, a traffic signal turn-off will require agencies' approval. Two (2)
weeks prior to any turn-off of the traffic signals, CONSULTANT shall coordinate
with AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned representatives, of the
anticipated schedule for the turn-off. Notice of the scheduled signal turn-off shall
be made to AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned representatives, in
writing at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the signal turn-off.
CONSULTANT shall make arrangements with AUTHORITY and the agencies for
all traffic signal shutdowns. CONSULTANT shall provide all necessary signing
and traffic control devices for the traffic control prior to and during each traffic
signal turn-off.
Traffic signal work shall not commence until such time that CONSULTANT
notifies AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned representatives, in
writing of the date that all furnished materials and equipment are received, and
said work shall start within seven (7) days after said date.
No materials or equipment shall be stored at the job sites unless written
authorization is provided by AUTHORITY and the agencies, or their assigned
representatives, authorizing said materials to be stored. The job sites shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly condition at all times. All equipment storage
and transport shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility.
Materials and equipment shall be stored so as not to create a public nuisance
and to insure the preservation of their quality and fitness for the work. No
materials or equipment shall be stored at the project site unless its use is
imminent.
Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(in part to include):
C4a. Signal Synchronization Equipment AUTHORITY/agencies Notifications.
4.4.5 TASK C-5: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION GUARANTEE
CONSULTANT shall guarantee the entire work installed by it under this
CONTRACT and will fully meet all requirements as to quality of workmanship
and labor furnished by it. CONSULTANT shall make, at its own expense, any
repairs or replacements made necessary by defects in workmanship and labor
furnished by it that become evident within one (1) year after BRT Final
Acceptance of the work for all corridors and to restore to full compliance with the
Scope of Work 91 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
requirements, any part of the work which during the one (1) year period is found
to be deficient with respect to any provision of the plans and specifications.
CONSULTANT shall make all repairs and replacements promptly upon receipt of
written orders from AUTHORITY or it assigned representative. If CONSULTANT
fails to make the repairs and replacements promptly, AUTHORITY or the agency
may do the work and CONSULTANT shall be liable to AUTHORITY and agency
for the cost.
Firmware and Software Upgrades for Control and Communications Systems for
Central, Field Master, and Local intersection controller units for installed specified
systems are included in the installed price for a period of 3 years.
New software for new features not originally installed nor specified is excluded
from this contract. Standard Warranties or Guarantees for new software or new
features are the responsibility of the agency receiving such equipment and the
standard warranties or guarantees supplied by the manufacturer or vendor.
Removal of existing equipment and appurtenances is included in the "removing,
reinstalling, or salvaging traffic signal equipment" installation price.
Attention is directed to:
Section 86 — 1.05 WARRANTIES, GUARANTIES, AND INSTRUCTION SHEETS
of the State Standard Specifications.
CONSULTANT shall provide a Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Signal
Synchronization Equipment Installation Guarantee Certification after
AUTHORITY issues Final Acceptance of all three (3) BRT corridors.
Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(in part to include):
C5a. Signal Synchronization Equipment Guarantee Certification.
4.4.6 TASK C-6: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - "AFTER STUDY"
CONSULTANT shall conduct an "After" field study report representative of the
times and days for which synchronization plans were developed. The "After"
Study must be conducted in the same manner and contain the same MOE's as
the "Before" Study in order to evaluate the improvements of the synchronization
plans. MOE's should be compiled for the optimized Westminster/17th Street BRT
Corridor using the floating car method (GPS interfaced PC Travel runs or Tru —
Traffic TS/PP runs) and Synchro 7.0. The "Before" Study floating car data was
collected using GPS interfaced PC Travel. If CONSULTANT decides to use
GPS interfaced Tru — Traffic TS/PP runs for the "After" study, CONSULTANT
must first present output compatibility between Tru — Traffic TS/PP and PC
Scope of Work 92 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Travel runs to the AUTHORITY for approval. For the "After" Study,
CONSULTANT shall conduct the same number of floating car 'runs' in each
direction during the same time periods as was done in the "Before" study.
The CONSULTANT shall provide a synchronized video with the "After" travel
time runs to augment the study. This video shall cover the entire length of the
corridor and concentrate on the most congested areas of the corridor around
freeways and high density commercial and business uses.
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor "After"
Study Project Report detailing the results of the signal timing optimization and
implementation, time -referencing system, fine tuning components, and
comparing the results of the "Before" and "After" field study with reference to the
specific MOE's. CONSULTANT shall present the findings to the AUTHORITY.
CONSULTANT shall also provide all floating car data results collected as part of
this task including, but not limited to, overall output statistics (distances, travel
time, number of stops, average speed compared to posted speed, total delay,
etc.), fuel consumption and emissions, speed/distance profiles, and time/space
trajectories of all runs shown on a per link / node basis. CONSULTANT shall
finalize the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor "After" Study Project Report
based on comments received from the AUTHORITY and agencies.
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(in part to include):
C6a. "After" Study Project Report.
C6b. Electronic versions of the "After" Study analysis and all floating car data
files.
4.4.7 TASK C-7: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT REPORT
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Draft Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Final
Timings and Evaluation Technical Report, including an executive summary. The
report shall provide complete documentation of the project, including, but not
limited to, project objectives, project locations, project scope, findings,
recommendations, implementation schedule, improvements accomplished,
furnished equipment test results, and procedures for continuing maintenance,
surveillance, and evaluation of the coordinated signal system, work performed,
data collected: "Before" and "After" studies and project benefits achieved in terms
of fuel savings, travel time, and other measurable parameters. The report shall
include graphical and table formats for each type of documentation for clarity
purposes. The report shall also equate or quantify any savings in travel time,
reduction in delay and emissions with type of emissions measured into a
monetary figure consistent with current publications. Report formats, including
Scope of Work 93 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
style and content of graphs and tables, shall be approved by the AUTHORITY
prior to submission.
The report shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor as well as recommendations for further
infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal
coordination project results. CONSULTANT shall present the final report and
results of the project to the AUTHORITY and city councils as required by
AUTHORITY in writing.
The report shall include for each intersection: lane configurations, signal phasing,
turning movement data, and cycle lengths for existing and proposed timings for
all peak periods. In addition, in a separate binder, all traffic signal phase
sequences, signal timing plans, and pedestrian timings shall be documented.
Finally, the report shall provide recommendations, including cost and benefit
estimates, for future improvements to traffic signal infrastructure (signal
controllers, vehicle detection, communications, etc.), intersection capacity
(appropriate signal phasing, lane geometrics, and alleviation of physical
bottlenecks that curtail arterial capacity), and traffic management strategies.
CONSULTANT shall submit a Final Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Final
Timings and Evaluation Technical Report to AUTHORITY and agencies which
addresses all comments provided by AUTHORITY and agencies in the Draft
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation Technical
Report.
The Report format shall consist of a Table of Contents, Executive Summary, with
technical appendices giving the Background, Methodologies, Before Conditions,
After Conditions, Before and After Analysis and Study Results, Elements of
Implementation, Special Demonstration of Equipment and Results, Conclusions,
Recommendations and Lessons Learned, followed by Appendices. As each
corridor has unique properties and functionality, prior to the Report being written,
the CONSULTANT shall meet with the AUTHORITY to discuss format and
content for each of the respective corridors.
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(in part to include):
C7a.
C7b.
C7c.
Scope of Work
Draft Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation
Technical Report.
Final Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Final Timings and Evaluation
Technical Report.
Presentations to the AUTHORITY and City Councils.
05/1 8/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
4.4.8 TASK C-8: WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES - PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
CONSULTANT shall develop a schedule for meetings AUTHORITY, agencies,
manufacturers, and others in order to facilitate the TSS Implementation Phase
along the Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor.
CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as directed by AUTHORITY and/or
agencies to discuss specific information and requirements related to the signal
synchronization along the Westminster/1 7 th Street BRT Corridor.
Meetings will also consist of any specific meeting called by AUTHORITY and/or
agencies, at which CONSULTANT's attendance is required.
CONSULTANT shall prepare and distribute meeting minutes and action item
matrix (Deliverable) to the project team five (5) days after meeting.
AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting agendas
for their review and written approval prior to the preparation of final meeting
agendas. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be provided with draft meeting
minutes for their review and written approval prior to the distribution of final
meeting minutes. AUTHORITY and/or its designee shall be invited and shall
participate at every meeting.
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(in part to include):
C8a. Project Meeting Agendas.
C8b. Project Meeting Minutes and Action items.
C8c. Action Item Matrix.
Scope of Work 95 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 4-4
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor
Potential Additional Signalized Intersections
Per Arterial Beyond Corridor Limits
Agency
Arterial
Location
0.1
Cross Street
Brea
State College
Boulevard
North of Brea Mall Driveway
North
1
Birch Street
2
Business Park/Financial Commons
3
Avocado Street
4
Lambert Road
5
Balsa Avenue
6
Cliffwood Avenue
7
Brea Boulevard
Orange
Metropolitan Drive
West of City Drive
1
R-22 Westbound Ramps
Santa Ana
Bristol Street
North of Memory Lane
1
Riverglen Lane
2
Hesperian Street/SR-22 EB Ramps
3
R-57 Northbound/SR-22 Westbound
onnector Off Ramp
4
1-5 Southbound Off Ramp
Costa Mesa
South of Sunflower Avenue
5
Town Center Drive
6
Anton Boulevard
7
-405 Northbound Ramps
8
-405 Southbound Ramps
9
usiness Center/Hotel Way
10
Paularino Avenue
11
Baker Street
Santa Ana
Newhope St
West of Bristol Street
1
1�t Street
2
McFadden Ave.
Fairview St
West of Bristol Street
1
Ill St
2[McFadden
Ave.
3
Edinger Ave.
4
Warner Ave.
5
Segerstrom Ave.
6
MacArthur Blvd.
Scope of Work 96 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 4-5
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor
Potential Additional Signalized Intersections
Per Arterial Beyond Corridor Limits
Agency
Arterial
Location'
No,
Cross Street,
Fullerton
Chapman Avenue
Eastof Commonwealth
Avenue
1
R-57 Southbound Ramps
2
R-57 Northbound Ramps
3
Placentia Avenue
West of Lemon Street
4
Pomona Avenue
5
Harbor Boulevard
6
Highland Avenue
7
Richman Avenue
8
Woods Avenue
9
Euclid Street
Fullerton
Harbor Boulevard
North of Commonwealth
1
Arnerige Avenue
2
Wilshire Avenue
3
Union Avenue
4
Berkeley Avenue
5
E. Valley View Drive
6
. Valley View Drive/Brea Boulevard
Carden Grove
Trask Avenue
East of Harbor Blvd.
1
R-22 Eastbound Ramps
Costa Mesa
Adams Avenue
East of Harbor Boulevard
1
Pinecreek Drive
2
Fairview Road
West of Harbor Boulevard
3
Royal Palm Drive
4
Mesa Verde Drive East
5
Mesa Verde Drive West
6
Shantar Drive/Albatross Drive
Fairview Road
North of Adams Avenue
1
Baker Street
2
Paularino Avenue
3
McCormack Lane
Newport
oulevard/SR-55
East of Harbor Boulevard
1
19th Street
'`Signalized intersections are currently linked with Harbor Boulevard's coordinated system.
Scope of Work 97 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
TABLE 4-6
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor
Potential Additional Signalized Intersections
Per Arterial Beyond Corridor Limits
Agency
Arterial -
Location
No.1
Cross SEreet
Seal Beach
Westminster Avenue
West of Seal Beach Boulevard
1
ApolloDrive (Driveway No.l)
2
Road B (Driveway No. 2)
Carden Grove
Brookhurst Street
South of Westminster Ave.
1
Reading Ave./15t^ Street
2
11 th Street
3
azard Avenue
Sant. Ana
17th Street
East of Flower Street
1
Ross Street
2
roadway
3
Main Street
4
Spurgeon Street
5
Penn Way
6
-5 Northbound Ramps/Santiago Street
'"Signalized intersections are currently linked with Westminster/17th Street's coordinated system.
Scope of Work 98 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 5.0
SUPPORT SERVICES
Scope of Work 99 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 5.0 SUPPORT SERVICES
5.1 PART "A" — BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS SUPPORT
SERVICES
5.1 .1 TASK A-1 : BRISTOL/STATE COLLEGE BRT CORRIDOR TSS SIGNAL
TIMING SUPPORT SERVICES
CONSULTANT shall provide continuing signal timing support to monitor,
observe, fine-tune, and optimize the signal timing and phasing operations of the
synchronized signalized intersections (as implemented as part of the SOW)
along the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor. The signal timing support services
shall last for a period of nine (9) months after written acceptance from
AUTHORITY is provided for the implementation of the signal timing along the
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor. The frequency of the signal timing support
services shall be at a rate of once per month for the initial three (3) months and
once every two months for the remaining six (6) months.
During each of the six (6) required support periods, CONSULTANT shall monitor
the Bristol/State College BRT Corridor via the Traffic Management System
(TMS) software (if applicable), and perform field surveys of the Bristol/State
College BRT Corridor to observe the traffic patterns, recommend fine-tuning,
and, if approved by AUTHORTY in writing, fine tune the signal timing based upon
the surveys.
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
Ala. Revised signal timing plans and progress reports documenting the
changes.
Al b. Provide TMS event logs and support activity logs.
Scope of Work 100 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
5.2 PART "B" — HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS SUPPORT
SERVICES
5.2.1 TASK B-1: HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR TSS SIGNAL TIMING
SUPPORT SERVICES
CONSULTANT shall provide continuing signal timing support to monitor,
observe, fine-tune, and optimize the signal timing and phasing operations of the
synchronized signalized intersections (as implemented as part of the SOW)
along the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor. The signal timing support services
shall last for a period of nine (9) months after written acceptance from
AUTHORITY is provided for the implementation of the signal timing along the
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor. The frequency of the signal timing support
services shall be at a rate of once per month for the initial three (3) months and
once every two months for the remaining six (6) months.
During each of the six (6) required support periods, CONSULTANT shall monitor
the Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor via the Traffic Management System (TMS)
software (if applicable), and perform field surveys of the Harbor Boulevard BRT
Corridor to observe the traffic patterns, recommend fine-tuning, and, if approved
by AUTHORTY in writing, fine tune the signal timing based upon the surveys.
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables (in
part to include):
B1a. Revised signal timing plans and progress reports documenting the
changes.
B1 b. Provide TMS event logs and support activity logs.
5.3 PART "C" — WESTMINSTER/17th STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS SUPPORT
SERVICES
5.3.1 TASK C-1 : WESTMINSTER/17TH STREET BRT CORRIDOR TSS SIGNAL
TIMING SUPPORT SERVICES
CONSULTANT shall provide continuing signal timing support to monitor,
observe, fine-tune, and optimize the signal timing and phasing operations of the
synchronized signalized intersections (as implemented as part of the SOW)
along the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor. The signal timing support
services shall last for a period of nine (9) months after written acceptance from
AUTHORITY is provided for the implementation of the signal timing along the
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor. The frequency of the signal timing
support services shall be at a rate of once per month for the initial three (3)
months and once every two months for the remaining six (6) months.
Scope of Work 101 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
During each of the six (6) required support periods, CONSULTANT shall monitor
the Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor via the Traffic Management System
(TMS) software (if applicable), and perform field surveys of the Westminster/17th
Street BRT Corridor to observe the traffic patterns, recommend fine-tuning, and,
if approved by AUTHORTY in writing, fine tune the signal timing based upon the
surveys.
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor TSS Implementation Services deliverables
(in part to include):
C1a. Revised signal timing plans and progress reports documenting the
changes.
C1 b. Provide TMS event logs and support activity logs.
Scope of Work 102 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 6.0
DELIVERABLES
Scope of Work 103 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 6.0 DELIVERABLES
The following outlines the general requirements for contract deliverables
(Deliverable) as defined within the SOW. In addition to the deliverables defined
in the SOW, AUTHORITY may, at its sole discretion, request additional
information for clarification, as needed. AUTHORITY shall require at least
twenty-one (21) days for reviewing each deliverable, unless stated otherwise in
writing.
6.1 DELIVERABLES REQUIREMENTS
6.1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION
Using the list of deliverables provided in the SOW as a base template,
CONSULTANT shall develop a comprehensive list of all documents. All of these
documents shall include sufficient information related to TSS furnishing,
installation, testing, commissioning, and all other aspects of the SOW.
CONSULTANT's list of deliverables shall include all of the documents specified
in this SOW, and shall also include additional documents, which CONSULTANT
deems appropriate to provide complete and comprehensive information to assist
AUTHORITY to review such documents. The list of deliverables within this
document is intended to include the basic requirements in the SOW. However, if
there are any items omitted, CONSULTANT shall provide all such additional
deliverables.
CONSULTANT shall provide a comprehensive list of deliverables, including any
additional deliverables that it intends to provide to AUTHORITY, and note any
suggested changes to the deliverable list provided in the SOW. This list shall
note any suggested changes to the due date, days to review, etc. The Final
Deliverables List (Deliverable) shall be provided to AUTHORITY for approval in
writing fifteen (15) days after NTP.
6.1.2 DELIVERABLES FORMAT
The deliverable format shall include the following information as specified below;
however, not necessarily in the stated order:
1. Cover page including title, the name of CONSULTANT, the deliverable
number, the submittal date, applicable section number, and other information
deemed necessary by CONSULTANT.
2. List of persons who will receive a copy of the cover page and/or deliverable.
3. Revision table with revision number, revision date, general nature of
change(s), and affected page(s).
Scope of Work 104 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
4. Signatures of the author(s) and approval(s) from responsible supervisors.
5. Table of contents.
6. Description, content, drawings, and schematics as applicable.
A minimum of four (4) hard copies and one electronic copy (in a media format as
approved by the AUTHORITY in writing) of each deliverable shall be provided,
unless otherwise specified in the SOW. CONSULTANT shall also keep a history
matrix of all deliverables related to the SOW. CONSULTANT shall provide
AUTHORITY with copy of history matrix in hard copy and/or electronic format
upon request.
6.2 LIST OF PROJECT DELIVERABLES
DELIVERABLE
TASK
TITLE
SECTION
SECTION 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1
Work Plan (NTP + 15 Days)
2.2.6
2
Project Schedule (NTP + 15 Days)
2.2.7
3
Final Deliverables List (NTP + 15 Days)
2.2.8
4
Monthly Progress Reports
2.2.9
5
Action Item Matrix
2.2.12
6
Final Technical Reports
2.2.13
SECTION 3.0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION DESIGN FINALIZATION
A6a
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Technical
7
memorandum detailing findings of the design
3.1 .6
phase documentation review
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - All Final
optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing
plans in Synchro format and the preferred timing
8
A7a
chart format of each agency, including (a)
3.1
existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
.7
programmed improvements (widening projects
and intersection improvements) within the next
five years after NTP).
Scope of Work 105 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
9
A7b
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Final Time-
3 1.7
Space Diagrams
10
A7c
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Final Signal
3.1
Timing Optimization Plan
.7
11
A7d
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Electronic
3.1
Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Final analysis
.7
12
A7e
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Electronic
3.1
Sim Traffic data files used in the Final analysis
.7
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Electronic
13
A7f
Versions of the Final analysis and all data files
3.1 .7
including the Tru-Traffic TS/PP files
14
A8a
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Project
3.1
Meeting Agendas
.8
15
A8b
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Project
3.1
Meeting Minutes and Action Items
.8
16
A8c
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Action Item
3.1
Matrix
.8
B6a
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Technical
17
memorandum detailing findings of the design
3.2.6
phase documentation review
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - All Final
optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing
plans in Synchro format and the preferred timing
18
B7a
chart format of each agency, including (a)
3.2.7
existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
programmed improvements (widening projects
and intersection improvements) within the next
five years after NTP .
19
B7b
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Final Time-
3.2.7
Space Diagrams
20
B7c
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Final Signal
3.2.7
Timing Optimization Plan
21
B7d
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Electronic
3.2.7
Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Final analysis
22
67e
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Electronic Sim
3.2.7
Traffic data files used in the Final analysis
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Electronic
23
B7f
Versions of the Final analysis and all data files
3.2.7
including the Tru-Traffic TS/PP files
24
B8a
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Project Meeting
3 2 8
Agendas
25
B8b
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Project Meeting
3 2 8
Minutes and Action Items
Scope of Work 106 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
26
B8c
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Action Item
3 2 8
Matrix
Westminster/17 Street BRT Corridor —
27
C6a
Technical memorandum detailing findings of the
3.3.6
design phase documentation review
Westminster/17 Street BRT Corridor —All Final
optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing
plans in Synchro format and the preferred timing
28
C7a
chart format of each agency, including (a)
3.3.7
existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and
programmed improvements (widening projects
and intersection improvements) within the next
five years after NTP .
29
C7b
\Nestminster/l Vn Street BRT Corridor — Final
3.3.7
Time -Space Diagrams
30
C7c
Westminster/17 th Street BRT Corridor — Final
3.3.7
Signal Timing Optimization Plan
Westminster/17 th Street BRT Corridor —
31
C7d
Electronic Synchro 7.0 data files used in the Final
3.3.7
analysis
Westminster/17 Street BRT Corridor —
32
C7e
Electronic Sim Traffic data files used in the Final
3.3.7
analysis
Westminster/17 Street BRT Corridor —
33
C7f
Electronic Versions of the Final analysis and all
3.3.7
data files including the Tru-Traffic TS/PP files
34
C8a
Westminster/l 7t Street BRT Corridor — Project
3.3.8
Meeting Agendas
35
C8b
Westminster/17 th Street BRT Corridor — Project
3.3.8
Meeting Minutes and Action Items
36
C8c
Westminster/17 Street BRT Corridor — Action
3.3.8
Item Matrix
SECTION 4.0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION IMPLEMENTATION
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Technical
memorandum containing field implementation of
optimized traffic signal plans for existing corridor
37
Ala
conditions, including all required fine tuning and
4.2
timing charts as requested by AUTHORITY and
agency, and final signal timing implementation
Ian.
38
A2a
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - List of
4.2.1
Materials, Units, and Prices
Scope of Work 107 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
39
A2b
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor — Copies of All
4.2.1
Purchase Orders and Product Manuals
40
A3a
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Signal
4.2.2
Synchronization Equipment Installation Schedule
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Signal
41
A4a
Synchronization Equipment
4.2.3
AUTHORITY/agencies Notifications
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Signal
42
A5a
Synchronization Equipment Guarantee
4.2.5
Certification
43
A6a
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - "After" Study
4.2.6
Project Report
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Electronic
44
A6b
versions of the "After" Study analysis and all
4.2.6
floating car data files
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Draft
45
A7a
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Final Timings
4.2.7
and Evaluation Technical Report
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Final
46
A7b
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor Final Timings
4.2.7
and Evaluation Technical Report
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor -
47
A7c
Presentations to the AUTHORITY and City
4.2.7
Councils
48
A8a
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Project
4.2.8
Meeting Agendas
49
A8b
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Project
`}'2 8
Meeting Minutes and Action items
50
A8c
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Action Item
4 2 8
Matrix
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Technical
memorandum containing field implementation of
optimized traffic signal plans for existing corridor
51
B1a
conditions, including all required fine tuning and
4.3.1
timing charts as requested by AUTHORITY and
agency, and final signal timing implementation
Ian.
52
B2a
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - List of
4.3.2
Materials, Units, and Prices
53
62b
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor — Copies of All
4.3.2
Purchase Orders and Product Manuals
54
B3a
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Signal
4.3.3
Synchronization Equipment Installation Schedule
Scope of Work 108 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Signal
55
B4a
Synchronization Equipment
4.3.4
AUTHORITY/agencies Notifications
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Signal
56
B5a
Synchronization Equipment Guarantee
4.3.5
Certification
57
B6a
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - "After' Study
4.3.6
Project Report
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Electronic
58
B6b
versions of the "After" Study analysis and all
4.3.6
floating car data files
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Draft Harbor
59
B7a
Boulevard BRT Corridor Final Timings and
4.3.7
Evaluation Technical Report
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Final Harbor
60
B7b
Boulevard BRT Corridor Final Timings and
4.3.7
Evaluation Technical Report
61
67c
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Presentations
4.3.7
to the AUTHORITY and City Councils
62
B8a
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Project Meeting
4.3.8
Agendas
63
B8b
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Project Meeting
4.3.8
Minutes and Action Items
64
B8c
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Action Item
4.3.8
Matrix
Westminster/17 th Street BRT Corridor - Technical
memorandum containing field implementation of
optimized traffic signal plans for existing corridor
65
C1a
conditions, including all required fine tuning and
4.4.1
timing charts as requested by AUTHORITY and
agency, and final signal timing implementation
Ian.
66
C2a
Westminster/17 Street BRT Corridor - List of
4.4.2
Materials, Units, and Prices
67
C2b
Westminster/17 Street BRT Corridor — Copies of
4.4.2
All Purchase Orders and Product Manuals
68
C3a
Westminster/17 Street BRT Corridor - Signal
4.4.3
Synchronization Equipment Installation Schedule
Westminster/1 7,nStreet BRT Corridor - Signal
69
C4a
Synchronization Equipment
4.4.4
AUTHORITY/agencies Notifications
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor - Signal
70
C5a
Synchronization Equipment Guarantee
4.4.5
Certification
Scope of Work 109 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor - "After"
71
C6a
Study Project Report
4.4.6
Westminster/l7th Street BRT Corridor -
72
C6b
Electronic versions of the "After" Study analysis
4.4.6
and all floating car data files
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor - Draft
73
C7a
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Final
4.4.7
Timings and Evaluation Technical Report
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor - Final
74
C7b
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor Final
4.4.7
Timings and Evaluation Technical Report
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor -
75
C7c
Presentations to the AUTHORITY and City
4.4.7
Councils
Westminster/l7th Street BRT Corridor - Project
76
C8a
Meeting Agendas
4.4.8
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor - Project
77
C8b
Meeting Minutes and Action items
4.4.8
Westminster/l7th Street BRT Corridor - Action
78
CSc
Item Matrix
4.4.8
SECTION 5.0 SUPPORT SERVICES
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Revised
79
Ala
signal timing plans and progress reports
5.1 .1
documenting the changes
Bristol/State College BRT Corridor - Provide TMS
80
Alb
event Logs and monthly support activity logs
5.1 .1
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Revised signal
81
B1a
timing plans and progress reports documenting
5.2.1
the changes
Harbor Boulevard BRT Corridor - Provide TMS
82
B1 b
event Logs and monthly support activity logs
5.2.1
Westminster/l7th Street BRT Corridor - Revised
83
Cla
signal timing plans and progress reports
5.3.1
documenting the changes
Westminster/17th Street BRT Corridor - Provide
84
C1 b
TMS event Logs and monthly support activity
5.3.1
logs
Scope of Work 110 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 7.0
DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Scope of Work 111 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 7.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
7.1 DEFINITIONS
A
Acceptance: Accepted by AUTHORITY for its use.
Addendum, Addenda: Written document clarifying, interpreting, or revising any of the
Contract Documents released by AUTHORITY. Each Addendum is sequentially
numbered.
Agency (Agencies): All Cities, Counties or Caltrans districts within the jurisdiction of
the three 3 BRT Corridors.
Approval, Approved: Acceptance in writing by AUTHORITY. Acceptance by
AUTHORITY in no way relieves CONSULTANT of meeting all requirements of the
Scope of Work.
AUTHORITY: The Orange County Transportation AUTHORITY or its appointed
designee.
B
Beneficial Occupancy: Allowance by AUTHORITY, where at its sole discretion, and
with the concurrence of CONSULTANT, AUTHORITY, Agency and other Parties, both
Parties mutually agree to take early (prior to contractually scheduled) possession of the
work in part or in whole.
Best Value Approach: Method used for selecting CONSULTANT for Design, Furnish
and Install.
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): Transit mode which can operate on exclusive transitways,
HOV lanes, expressways, or ordinary streets with limited Stops.
C
Calculations: Numerical computations performed to demonstrate and quantify
compliance with the SOW.
California Transportation Commission (CTC): A State Agency that sets State
spending priorities for highway and transit and allocates funding. Members are
appointed by the Governor.
Central Communications or CC: Central location for monitoring, directing, and
Scope of Work 112 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
controlling all bus movements and operational functions on the BRT System and the
communications and administrative center for the BRT System.
Certification: The action of determining, verifying, and attesting in writing to the
qualifications of personnel, equipment and/or materials.
Change Orders: A written directive issued by AUTHORITY, authorizing the
CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR to provide additional work, not originally included in the
CONTRACT. Change Orders are sequentially numbered, and follow an established
process/procedure from point of inception through their execution.
Component: A piece or part of an Assembly orequipment such as a mechanical or
electrical part or support structure that is combined with other Components to form a
system, subsystem, Assembly, sub Assembly, or part.
CONSULTANT: A person, persons, firm, partnership, corporation, or combination
thereof which has entered into a CONTRACT with AUTHORITY to provide TSS Design,
Implementation and Finalization, Support Services, and other Program related
professional services, as identified in this Scope of Work.
CONTRACT: A written, binding agreement executed between AUTHORITY and
CONSULTANT setting forth the obligations of the Parties there under. The CONTRACT
also includes all duly executed Change Orders issued subsequent to the original
execution of the CONTRACT.
Contract Documents: All volumes including, but not limited to, the Scope of Work
(Exhibit A), Drawings and Specifications (Exhibit B), Terms and Conditions (Exhibit C),
Special Conditions (Exhibit C), Performance bond, and Non -Collusion Affidavit; all of
which constitute one instrument.
Corridor: A consistent path and set of endpoints traversed by a BRT Bus in revenue
service for transporting assen ers.
Commercial -Off -The -Shelf (COTS): Referring typically to software products or
software -intensive products, meets all of the following requirements:
a. Exists a priori from a commercial vendor.
b. It is available to the corporate community.
c. It can be bought or leased or licensed).
D
Days: Unless otherwise designated, days as used in the Contract Documents shall be
understood to mean calendar days.
Defect: Non fulfillment of an intended usage requirement or reasonable expectation.
Scope of Work 113 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Deliverables: Items to be delivered by the CONSULTANT to AUTHORITY under this
CONTRACT.
Design, Furnish, Install: CONTRACT delivery method whereby a consultant or
contractor develops and provides the Design, Furnishing and Installation requirements
for all Components, parts, equipment, assemblies, subsystems, and systems including
hardware, software, Interfaces, wires, cables, harnesses, incidentals and other services,
including labor and management, and all other related contractual requirements.
Direction: Assigned movement and orientation of a bus on the Corridor. For
convention, movements are either North -South or East-West.
Draft (Design): The design which depicts all necessary elements of the System or
subsystem and which requires AUTHORITY and agencies review. This design is not
ready to be implemented and installed. This is the design prior to Final Design.
Drawings: Plans, Contract Drawings.
F
Factory Acceptance Tests: Tests performed prior to shipment to verify compliance
with specifications and quality standards.
Failure: Malfunction of a Component, Assembly, or system resulting from a cause other
than misuse, mishandling, or vandalism, requiring unscheduled maintenance/
replacement to restore to normal operating condition to achieve its intended function.
Fault: The malfunction of a Component, Assembly, or system that is not caused due to
vandalism or mishandling.
Field Conditions: Including, but not limited to, site conditions, traffic patterns, etc.
Final (Design): The design which depicts all necessary elements of the System or
subsystem and which is ready to be implemented and installed.
I
Invitation for Bid (IFB): Bid procurement delivery method commonly used for Public
Works construction contracts.
Independent Failure: A Failure which is not the result of another Failure, either directly
or indirectly.
Indicated: As used in these Contract Documents, shall be understood to mean, "as
Scope of Work 114 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
shown on the Conceptual Drawings" or "as described in the Scope of Work."
Inspections: Visual Verifications and examinations to determine compliance to the
Contract Documents and satisfactory conditions, accuracy, safety, or Performance.
Interface:
a. The defined common boundary between two systems or subsystems that
may be electrical, mechanical, functional, or contractual.
b. A point where a system, subsystem or component comes into functional or
physical contact with another.
M
Manufacturer: The Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) defined as the producer or
supplier of materials, equipment, or apparatus for installation on the vehicle.
Memorandum of Understanding: Agreements between Local Agencies, departments,
and stakeholders in the Program.
N
Non Compliance or Non Conformance: Any part, procedure, specification, or Drawing
that does not conform to contractual orspecified requirements.
P
Party, Parties: Entities entering into a legally binding CONTRACT.
Performance: The functional effectiveness obtained by a system, subsystem, part, or
an element asspecified.
Phase: Project timeframe defined by milestones.
Previous consultant: A person, persons, firm, partnership, corporation, or combination
thereof which had entered into a CONTRACT with AUTHORITY and provided
Engineering and Design services, as identified in this Scope of Work.
Program: Bravo! Bus Rapid Transit Program.
Q
Quality Assurance/Quality Control: Planned and systematic activities necessary to
provide adequate confidence that items and services conform to the requirements and
Scope of Work 115 05/18/1 O
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
shall perform satisfactorily in service.
R
Route: See Corridor.
S
Schedule: A timetable which identifies each specific bus number, Direction of travel,
frequency, and arrival times at each Stop.
Scope Of Work (SOW): Section of the Contract Documents that defines all of the work
elements to be provided as part of the CONTRACT.
Significant Implementation Milestone: Work that has reached an advanced level or
threshold of completion. This threshold varies for different types of elements of work.
State: State of California.
Submittals: See Deliverables.
T
Testing: The process whereby the CONSULTANT verifies that the Components,
equipment, subsystems, systems and Interfaces function as specified and Interface
safely and properly with each other.
Test Reports: Reports of tests signed by qualified professional attesting that tests were
performed in accordance with the test method specified, that the test results reported
are accurate, and that items tested meet or fail to meet the stated requirements.
Transportation Management Center: A facility housing the operations management
centers.
V
Value Engineering: A formal and defined method of optimizing and balancing cost,
function, operation, Maintainability, overall life cycle cost, or other project parameter(s)
to achieve the best AUTHORITY defined value for the Project.
Verification: Is the act of reviewing, inspecting, Testing, checking, auditing, or
otherwise establishing and documenting whether items, processes, services, or
documents conform to specified requirements.
W
Scope of Work 116 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
Work: All of the work required to Design, Furnish, Install, Test and provide complete
functional TSS. Shall also include all activities after Testing until CONTRACT closeout.
Scope of Work 117 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
7.2 ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviations
Description
A
A&E
Architectural and Engineering
ADA
Americans with Disabilities Act
APWA
American Public Works Association
AQMD
Air Quality Management District
ASTM
American Society for Testing and Materials
AUTHORITY
Orange County Transportation Authority
B
BLVD
Boulevard
BRT
Bus Rapid Transit
C
CA
California
CADD
Computer Aided Drafting & Design
CALTRANS
California Department of Transportation
CAMM
Contracts Administration and Materials Management
CAMUTCD
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
CC
Central Communications
CCTV
Closed Circuit Television
CONSULTANT
Design, Furnish and Install Consultant
COTS
Commercial -Off -The -Shelf
CPM
Critical Path Method
CTC
California Transportation Commission
D
DBE
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
F
FHWA
Federal Highway Administration
G
GPS
Global Positioning Systems
I
I-
Interstate
1-405
San Diego Freeway
IEEE
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
IFB
Invitation For Bid
ITC
Irvine Transportation Center
ISO
International Standards Organization
J
JPEG
Joint Photographic Expert Group
K
KB
Kilobytes
M
MOE
Measures Of Effectiveness
Scope of Work 118 05/18/10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0826
EXHIBIT A
MOU
Memorandum of Understanding
MS
Microsoft
N
NEC
National Electrical Code
NEMA
National Electrical Manufacturers Association
NIC
Not In Contract
NS
Network Subsystem
NTP
Notice to Proceed
O
O&M
Operating and Maintenance
OCTA
Orange County Transportation AUTHORITY
P
PM
Project Manager
PMC
Project Management Consultant
PS&E
Plans, Specifications and Estimates
PW
Public Works
Q
QA/QC
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
R
RFI
Reguest for Information
RFP
Requests for Proposals
S
SCOOT
Split, Cycle, and Offset Optimizer Techniques
SCE
Southern California Edison
SOW
Scope of Work
SR
State Route
SSP
State of California Standard Plans
SSS
State of California Standard Specifications
T
TAC
Technical Advisory Committee
TBD
To Be Determined
TMC
Transportation Management Center
TOPD
Traffic Operations Policy Directives
TSS
Traffic Signal Synchronization
w
WATCH
Work Area Traffic Control Handbook
Scope of Work 119 05/1 8/1 O
Attachment A
IA HABRA
BREA
Brea Mall
NORWALK
d
LA MIRADA
r
1
BELLFLOWER
j
_
FULLERY)N
V ORBA LINDA
J
CSUF
ERRITOS I
-�
ARTESIA
PLACENTIA
BLJENj
FUNerton
ARK
PARK
Transportation
Cerrter
LAKEWOOD
1
-
^ LA
PALMA
AWAIIAN i
RDENS�
LONG BEACH
CYPRESS
ANAIIEIM
Resort
Honda Caner.
VILLA
Brea
Angel Statlium,
PARK
r 5iBAneheim
`aW
Sta[ion
W;;l�
LOS STANTON
ALAMITOS
/
ORANGE
GARDEN GROVE
Westminster/17th Street
I -
The Depot at
"
Santa Ana
'- -
SEAL BEACH WESTMINSTER
Santa Ane
College
SANTAANA
t 1
South
\ HUNTINGTON BEACH
FOUN VALLEY
Coast
Plaza
TUSTIN
e
�\ m COSTA
MESA John Weyna Irvine
\ Airport �, Station
IRVINE
Triongla UCI Irene -
Sq era Spectnrm -
NEWPORT BEACH
Newport Beach
Prer
Traffic Signal Synchronization and Bravol BRT Projects
Harbor Boulevard Signal Synchronization
Bristol / State College Boulevard Signal Synchronization
Westminster / 17th Street Signal Synchronization
Former Harbor Boulevard BRT (Route 543)
Former Bristol / State College Boulevard BRT (Route 557)
Former Westminster / 17th Street BRT (Route 560)
O il 4 ®
Source: OCTA
Miles
VICJO
LAGUNA
BEACH
LAGUNA `
NIGUEL
A
-
"ro"
8,iso,|St(GuoUonorAvo'BukorS*'AMPbu South-,
| __~---~--k*nw^------- | —'---|
Sunflower Ave (xmummm) | Anton Blvd (xing coom) |
Town Center n, /4muwuOff Ramp
91 1
r-----noo
14m000Off Ramp | paumnnwm |
Hotel Way Baker St
m it i86 ft i 823n---------�
M
OCTA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Jerry Ar—te
Chairman
Patricia Bates
vice Chairman
Art Brown
Director
Peter Buff,
Director
Bill Campbell
Director
Carolyn V Cavecche
Director
William ✓_ Dalton
Director
Richard Dixon
Director
Paul G- Glaab
Director
Don Hansen
D,, ector
Allan M,nsoor
Director
John Moorlach
Director
Shawn Nelson
Director
Janet Nguyen
Director
Cu I Pringle
Director
Miguel Pulido
Director
Gregory T Win terbcttom
Director
Cindy Ouen
Go,emer's
Ex-Off-0 Member
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE"
Tit Kempten
Chief Executive Officer
December 1, 2010
Ms. Maria D. Huizar
Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, 8th Floor
Santa Ana, CA 92702
SUBJECT: OCTA'S MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO.
C-9-0826
Dear Ms. Huizar:
Enclosed are three originals of. Memorandum of Understanding No. C-9-0826
for your review and signature.
Please execute all three originals of the MOU where indicated, in blue ink and
return to Pia Veesapen as soon as possible to:
Pia Veesapen
Senior Contract Administrator
OCTA
550 South Main Street
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA. 92863-1584
Should you have any contractual related questions, please feel free to contact
Pia Veesapen at (714) 560-5619 or by e-mail at pveesapen@octa.net.
Sincerely,
r
Ju i,6 Smith
-ice Specialist
Contract Administration and Materials Management
Enc!osure(s)
Orange County Transportation Authority
550 South Main Street / PO. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)
CHECKLIST FOR PROCESSING
AGREEMENTS AND AMENDMENTS
JAN 1 1 Ptl
TO: CLERK OF THE COUNCIL OFFICE -nil"�-' *�8
2 C)i/- O O y
/V-20//_00,S
`V-a o i/ - o o 4
CITY OF -A ANuA
FROM DEPT: VJ A CAE R K
CONTACT PERSON:_EXT. CT 1 Z
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN REQUESTING PROCESSING OF AGREEMENTS FOR THE CITY:
ice 3t 2 L+_ \\\
AGREEMENT NUMBER (if amendment): A / N
!E�)Z�
AMENDMENT NUMBER (if applicable): 0 1ST 0 2ND 0 3RD
COUNCIL APPROVAL DATE:
AMOUNT: D OVER $25,000*(A)
�% — no Co
0 UNDER $25,000*(N) /
NAME OF CONSULTANT: �� �Ti G Aj A, fQ ", �(
TERM OF AGREEMENT: EFFECTIVE DATE: >-L 7 11/71 rU TERMINATION DATE: b� ( -I— C
INSURANCE REQUIRED: C<NO (Provide City Attorney Office approval)
0 YES
E:1 AUTO 0 COIL (Commercial General Liability)
0 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY 0 WORKERS COMPENSATION
(INSURANCE APPROVAL REQUIRED BY CAO PRIOR TO SUBMITTING TO COTC)
SIGNATURES REQUIRED:
0 VENDOR 0 AGENCY (UNDER $25,000)
0 CITY ATTORNEY OTHER - CA T -f t -. -
COMMENTS:c�
Z94 fl
FOR CLERK OFFICE USE ONLY:
PROCESS 0 DO NOT PROCESS
O MISSING SIGNATURE
O NEEDS COUNCIL APPROVAL
O OTHER
ADDITIONAL REMARKS: J
*Charter amendment effective December 21, 2006 for City Manager contract authority increase.