Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 - Contract - Interior Demolition Inc - 8 Properties 1 ~ ~ ; . T~ M ?':f~"R4~ AGENCY BOARD I~IEETINC DATEe AENCYECETARY USE ONLY. TITLE: APPROVED ~ A~ Recom~ended CUNTRACT wITH INTERIOR ~ AsAmended st ~ ordinance on 1 ~~Reading DEMOLITION, INC. FC~R THE ®Q~dinance on Z Reading DEMOLITION OF EIGHT PROPERTIES ~ Implementing Resolution Set Public Hearing Far CC~NTIN[JED T~ F,~ FILE NUMBER INTERII~I ECUTI~E DIRECTOR RECO~[ENDED ACTNO ~ . Authorize the Executive director and Agency Secretary to execute the attached contract with Interior Demolition, Inc. in the amount of $8,535 subject to non~substantive changes approved by the Executive Director and Agency General Counsel. 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated demolition cost of $9~,~42. DISCUSSION The Community Redevelopment Agency Agency} has acquired properties in the Santa Ana Boulevard area for the purpose of redeveloping the entryway from the freeway into the downtown by creating new housing in the Station District. The Agency is prepared to move forward with the development of these properties. In order to accomplish the development, eight properties need to be demolished. The Agency is prepared to enter into a contract Exhibit } to demolish the following eight properties: 5 ~ N. Minter Street, 5D9 E. Sixth Street, 515 E. Sixth Street, D~7 E. Sixth Street, fi~Q E. Fifth Street, D~3 N. Garfield Street, 8D~ E. Santa Ana Boulevard and ~0~' N. Garfield Street Exhibit A Request for Proposals was prepared and made available on the City's website on April ~ 1, X01 ~ . Availability of the document was made known by means of a Notice published in the Orange County Reporter on April and Z01~. Notice of the availability was also emailed to ~5 der~olition contractors who had previously expressed an interest in bidding an Agency projects. Contract with Interior Demolition, Inc. far the Demolition of Eight Properties May 20~ 1 Page ~ Responsive bids were received from five qualified firms All bids received are summarized in the table below Com an Name City Total did Amount Interior demolition, Inc. Montrose, CA ~1~,~35.Da Graham Crackers Demo, Inc. Menifee, CA g~,~46.00 Vizion's lllllest, Inc. 1!llinchester, CA ~98,2~4.go Flores Sierra Contractors, Inc. Chula Vista, CA 0,~~2.Do 5M Contracting Tustin, CA ~134,32o.Q0 The bid received from Interior Demolition, Inc. was the lowest responsive bid. A contingency of 20°fo or a total project budget Exhibit 3} of g4,~~~.~4 will ensure adequate funding to demolish the buildings, provide for necessary site work and fund any necessary contingencies. Prior to publishing the Request for Proposals, all structures were tested for lead and asbestos and some of the structures tested positive for these environmental hazards. Interior Demolition, Inc. has the appropriate licenses and certifications to remove and dispose of these materials. These properties have been offered to the Santa Ana Historic Preservation Satiety ~SAHPS} far the purpose of identifying items to be salvaged. Interior Demolition, Inca will be removing the items identified by SAHPS. SAHPS will be responsible for transporting the items to their storage facility EN~IR~NI~IENTAL ~P~ACT The environmental impact of demolishing these properties was evaluated in the EIR prepared for the Transit Zoning Code ~SCH # ~00~0~~ ~ a4}, which was certified by the Santa Ana City Council on June ~O~o. Specifically, these demolitians are a component of the "Station District Project" also called the "Developer Project"} analyzed therein. There have been no changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that would require any major revisions to the Final EIR and there is no new information with respect to the project that would require such revisions. Therefore, na supplemental or subsequent environmental analysis is required under Public Resources Code section 1 The revisions to the Station District Project resulting Pram the April 18, Z~1 ~ Settlement Agreement between the City and Agency and the Friends of the Lacy Historic Neighborhood do not change this conclusion. Additionally, in compliance with mitigation measure MM4.463, adopted by the City and the Agency an June 20~ g, the Agency has determined that none of the properties identified shave far demolition are historical resaurces as defined in Section 1 ~g~4.5 of the Guidelines far implementatian of the California Environmental Quality Act ~"CEQA"}. The "Station District Project Historical Assessment" prepared by Sapphas Environmental, Inc. ~E~chibit 4} supports this conclusion. Cantract with Interior Demolition for fihe Demolitian of Eight Properties May ~D~ Page ~ FISCAL II~P~CT Funding far the architectural services is budgeted and available in Tax Increment, Housing Set- Aside Funds account no. 5a1~ 883Q-~~~2a}. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AID ACCO~JNTS: Shelly L dry-Gayle Francisco Gutierrez 6~'~:~°~ Housing anager Executive Director Community DevelopmentAgency Finance & Management Services Agency NTEISLBIRLImIr Exhibits; ~ ~ Contract Map 3~ Funding Analysis 4. Station District Project Historical Assessment THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 4-4 I~EIV~~LITIC~I~ C~]1~T4CT THIS C~~TRACT, made and entered into this 16~ day of 1VIay 201 I, by and between Interior I)emalitian, Inc., a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor", and the Community Redevelopment Agency for the City of Santa Ana, a public body, corporate and politic, hereina~er referred to as "Agency" RECITALS: A. Agency desires to employ a general licensed building Contractor as defined in California business and Professions Code ~ ?057 to perform demolition work on property located at ~ 1 I N. Minter Street, X09 E. Sixth Street, X15 E. Sixth Street, G17 E. Sixth Street, ~~0 E. Fifth Street, X23 N. Garfield Street, SOl E. Santa Ana boulevard. and 707 N. Barfield Street, in the City of Santa Ana the "Property"~, B. Contractor represents that it is qualified to perform such work as desired by Agency. wHEREF~RE, for and in consideration of the respective and mutual covenants and promises hereinafter contained and made, and subject to all the terms and conditions hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. SCOPE ~F w~R.~. A. Project S eci~ications. Contractor agrees, at its sale cost and expense, to provide all supervision, technical personnel, labor, materials, n~achi.n.ery, teals, equipment, fixtures and services for the work required far demolition of the Property, in accordance with the attached bid and proposal, general conditions, work write-ups, specifications, and drawings, which documents are incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. See Exhibit A "Project Specifications" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference}. Contractor shall perform all warp in conformance with applicable laws and local requirements whether or not covered by the specif cations and drawings far the work. Contractor shall pay all sales, cansum.er, use and other similar taxes required by law, and shall procure and pay for all permits and licenses necessary far the execution and completion of the warp and labor to be performed hereunder. Prevailin~a~. All laborers and mechanics employed by the Contractor and any subcontractor. in the performance of the work under this Agreement shall be paid wages at rates not less than. the prevailing wage as provided in the statutes applicable to public works including without limitation Sections 1770-I7~0 of the California Labor Code. This paragraph does not apply to contracts which do not exceed $~,000~ I~~TICE T~ PR.[~CEEI~I~(]T~CES The work shall begin no later than twenty X20} calendar days Pram. and after Contractor receives written notice to proceed from the Agency. Failure by Contractor without lawful excuse to substantially begin work within twenty ~~0~ days of the date of receipt of said written native to proceed shall postpone the next succeeding payment to the Contractor far that period of time equivalent to the time between when worl~ was to begin and whey. it did ~~egin. Agency shall give said notice to proceed within (arty-five ~45~ calendar days from and a~e~~~ the date of the signing of this Contract. If the written notice to proceed is nor; ~ E~HI~[T ~ received by Contractor wi~.in said period, Contractor reserves the right to withdraw hisfher bid and proposal. Notices shall be addressed to the Contractor at: Interior Demolition, Inc 221 Honolulu Ave. Montrose, CA 91020 ~S 18} 2494932 Attn: Marco ~Tolina 3. TIDE F~l~ C~NIPLETI{]l~/ ~[~~TRA.~T TE~NI The term of this contract is from the date set forth above through August 1, 2~ 11, A11 wark shall be satisfactorily ca~.pleted within SILTY (~o} days from the date when said wark is commenced. 4, ~LEAI~IJP Contractor shall keep the premises glean and orderly during the course of the work and remove all debris upon completion of the work. Materials and equipment that have been removed and replaced as part of the work shall belong to Contractor. 5. C~A~.~E ~I~ LIENI PERFCIRMANCE Contractor shall pay when due all valid charges for labor and material incurred by Contractor and used in the construction pursuant to this Contract and shall also be responsible far keeping the job free of mechanic's liens recorded by any of the persons enumerated in California Civil Code ~ 3 I I D. If Contractor fails to make any payments required pursuant to this paragraph, or if Contractor fails to keep said real property free of m.echanic's liens incurred by or under Contractor or its subcontractors, Agency may settle said claims and Contractor shall ratify the Agency in writing when a legitimate dispute arises between Contractor and any and all persons enumerated in California Civil Code ~ 3110. Contractor shall provide the Agency with a Payment hand and Bond of Faithful Performance in the standard amount based on the cost of the project, Such bands shall be executed by both the Contractor and the Surety Company to the satisfaction of the Agency General Counsel. If Contractor fails or is unable to obta.n said bond, Agency may obtain and record said bond and deduct the casts from any payment due Contractor, C~ECTI~IV AEI) DEFECTS Contractor shall correct any work that fails to conform to the requirements of this Contract ar any documents pursuant thereto, where said failure to conform appears during the progress of the work. Contractor shall remedy any defects due to faulty materials, equipment or workmanship w~.ch appear within a period of. one ~1}year from the date of substantial completion of the wark ar within such longer period of time as maybe prescribed bylaw or by the terms of any applicable special guarantee required by this Contract ar any document pursuant thereto. 7. ~~UAITEE 4. Contractor guarantees the work performed for a period a~~ one ~ 1 } year from the date of final acceptance of all the work required by this Contract, unless the wark required repair or construction of a roof, in which case Contractor guarantees the work ar a e.~iorl of five ~5~ years. Further Contractor shall E~~M~IT ~ furnish the Agency, all manufacturer's and supplier's written guarantees and warranties covering materials and equipment furnished under this Contract. Contractor guarantees all materials to be as specified and all work to be completed in a professional manner according to standard practice. Unless otherwise specified, all materials shall be new. Contractor shall leave the work in a finished condition as determined by acceptable building standards and to the satisfaction of the Agency. INSPE~TI~N Contractor shall permit the Agency, or its designees}, to exarnlne and inspect the rehabilitation work. 1n addition, Agency shall have the right to inspect any work performed hereunder to ensure that the work is being and has been performed in accordance with the applicable federal, state andlor local requirements and this Contract. Contractor agrees that all work found by such inspections not to conform to the applicable requirements to be corrected, and Agency sha11 have the right to withhold payment to Contractor until it is so corrected. 9. IJTILITIE~ A~~ C~I~PERATI~I~ while this Agreement is in full force and effect, Agency shall penult Contractor to use existing utilities such as Tight, heat, power and water to carry out and complete the work and shall cooperate with Contractor to facilitate the performance of coverings and furniture, if and to the extent necessary. 1Q. (~C'~UPATI~I~ ~P P1~ENJ[ISE~ The prerr~ises are to be vACAT during the course of the work, 11. ~HAI~~E ~RIIE~~ Any changes or deviations from specifications or terms of this Contract shall be effective only upon the prior written consent of the Contractor and the Agency. All change orders will specifically describe the work andlar changes, the additional contract price and time far completion. 1~. ~(]TI~E ~P C'[IMPLETICI~t The Agency shall execute, acknowledge, a~ad record in the manner provided by law, a notice of completion of work required by this Contract within. fifteen X15} calendar days after final inspection and approval of said rehabilitation work as fully completed by the Agency. 13. ~~~TI~ACT~~.'~ PEE! ~~~PE~.ATI~II~ owner agrees to pay Contractor far the full and complete performance of all of Contractor's covenants and responsibilities hereunder in accordance with Exhibit A in the amount of $75,535.00. Payment due Contractor shall be paid within thirty X30} calendar days after the Agency receives Contractor's invoice and satisfactory releases of liens or chinas far liens by Contractor, subcontractors, laborers, and material suppliers for completed work or installed materials, Ten ~ 10%} of such payment to Contractor shall be retained by .Agency. The retention funds shall be released thirty-five X35}calendar days after final inspection and acceptance of all work to be performed by Contractor and Contractor has furnished the Agency, ,satisfactory releases of liens ar claims for liens by Contractor, ~ subcant;ractors, laborers, and material. suppliers ~Natice of Completion filed and recorded with the County Recorder}. Payments may be withheld on account of defective wank not remedied, claims fled, failure of Contractor to make payments properly to subcontractors or for labor, materials, ar equipment, damages by another Contractor, or unsatisfactory performance of the work. by Contractor, as determined by the Agency. The project budget allows for additional funds, supported by adequately documented approved change orders, in the amount of $15,707.DO, to ensure project completion, with an overall total budget of ~9~,~42.00. l4a IN~I~E~INI~'~~A"~I[~N Contractor shall indemnify and save harmless the Agency, its officers and employees, against any and all damages to property and injuries to ar death of any person or persons, including employees ar agents of the Agency, and sha11 defend, indemnify and save harmless owner and the Agency, its officers and employees, from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions or proceedings of any kind ar nature, including, but not by way of limitation, worker's compensation claims of or by anyone whomsoever in any way resulting from or arising out of the operations in connection herewith, including operations of subcontractors and acts or omissions of employees ar agents of Contractor or its subcontractors. 15~ I~~~J~~41~C~ with respect to performance of worl~ under this Contract, Contractor shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to maintain insurance as described below; ~a} workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits, and employer's liability insurance with limits of not less than ~1,0~~,~0o per incident; and fib} Contractor shall maintain conunercial general liability insurance naming the Agency, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees as additional insureds} and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Contractor's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the fallawinge single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $i,o~o,000 per occurrence. Contractor sha11 supply the Agency with a fully executed additional insured endorsement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit ~ upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved in farm by the Agency General Counsel. ~c} Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than l,o~o,DD~ per occurrence. such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non~owned automobiles. ~d} Contractor shall ~a} furnish properly executed certif cater of insurance to the Agency prior to commencement of worl~ under this Contract, which certificates shall clearly evidence all coverage required above and. provide that such insurance sha11 not be materially changed or terminated except on 3 ~ days' prier written notice to the Agency; and fib} maintain such insurance from the time work first commences until completion of the work under this Contract; and ~c} replace such certificate for policies expiring prior to completion of work under this Contract, ~ . ~ Ei~H~~T ~ 4 16. .A~EI~C~' S P~w]ER Tel TE1~MIl~A.TE Should Contractor carnn~.it any of the acts specified in this paragraph, Agency may, by giving ten X10} calendar days notice in writing thereof to Contractor, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies given Agency by law ar by this Contract, terminate the services of Cantractar under this Contract, take possession of all materials and appliances located an said real property, and complete the work required by this Contract. Cantractar shall be deemed to have committed an act specified in this paragraph if it shall: ~a} Be adjudged a bankrupt; fib} Make a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors; ~c} Refuse ar fail to supply enough properly skilled workers or proper materials to complete the work required by this Contract within the time specified in this Contract; ~d} Fail to mare prompt payment to subcontractors, laborers, or ~n.aterial m.en far labor performed ar materials f~rn.ished to the work required by this Contract; fie} Persistently disregard any law or ordinance relating to the work required by this Contract or the completion thereof; or ~f} Qtherwise commit a substantial violation of any provision of this Contract. 17. ~~I~TS TEIk~I~ATI~~ A~E~~~ Should Agency terminate the services of Contractor under this Contract and complete the work pursuant without Cantractar, Contractor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment under this Contract until the work is fully completed, ~n completion of said work by Agency, if the unpaid balance of the contract price exceeds the expenses incurred by Agency in completing the wank, including any compensation paid by Agency far managerial, administrative, or supervisorial services in con~.pleting the work, such excess shall be promptly paid by Agency to Contractor. lf, however, on completion of the work by Agency, the expenses incurred by Agency in complcting said work, including any compensation by Agency for managerial, administrative, or supervisorial services in completing said work, exceed the unpaid balance of the contract price, such excess shall be promptly paid by Contractor to Agency. 18. C~N~TI~ACT~~~ S P~wET~ TIC TER~J[INATE CI~NTRAC`T Should Agency fail to pay to Contractor within thirty ~3~} calendar days after such receipt of proper invoice, without just cause, any amount payable by Agency to Contractor, Cantractar may, by giving fifteen ~l calendar days written notice thereof to Agency, terminate its services under this Contract and stop work on said Property, 19. LI(~L~I~ATEIII)AIVIAhE~ Contractor and Agency agree that it would either be impractical or extremely difficult to ~x actual damages in the event Contractor fails to complete the described work within the time prescribed by this Contract. in connection therewith, Cantractar agrees to pay Agency liquidated damages for each calendar day beyond the date when completion is required hereinabove, excluding extensions as stated, below in the following amount; Une Hundred Dollars ($10a.~0} per calendar day. The amount of liquidated damages shall be deducted from the Contractor's Retention Payment at proj ect completion. If at any time the amount of liquidated damages exceed the amount of Retention Payment, there shall not be any payment to the Contractor until such time that the amount of payment due the Contractor exceeds the amount of liquidated damages. ~ ~ g ~xH~s~T ~ S t A~SI~NMEN~T Contractor shall not assign any rights under this Contract except upon prior written authorisation of .Agency. Any request for assignment must be addressed to the Agency and written consent of the Agency must be obtained prior to Contractor assigning any rights under this Contract. Contractor shall not delegate any authority or responsibility that would in any way purport to relieve him of any obligation imposed by this Contract. ~1. ~I~NI}IS~RII~IIN~ATI~~ E UAL ~PP~RTTJI~IT~' ACID FAIR I~I~USI~G During the performance of this Contract, Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable nondiscrimination, equal opporhinity and fair housing and employment laws, and shall not discriminate in hiring on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, disability, marital status, national origin or ancestry. ZZ. C~I~FLIC'T [IF INTEREST No person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer or elected off vial or appointed official of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana, ar the City of Santa Ana, who exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to the Agency? s residential rehabilitation program,, or who is in a position to participate in adecision-making process or to gain inside information with regard to these activities, may obtain a financial interest or beneft from this Contract, or have an interest in any subcontract or agreement with respect hereto, either for themselves or those with whom they have farr~ily or business ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. ~3. PR~IFESSICII~AL LTCEN~SES Contractor shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, n~.aintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws anal regulations of the ~Jnited States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies, Contractor shall notify the Agency immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. ~4. U~AV[III~A~LE I~ELA~S ADD IIEFAULT~ The time of completion of this Contract shall be extended by the number of calendar days which Contractor is prevented from performing work as a result of: incl.e~nent weather, acts of Agency not contemplated by this Contract, the unavailability of workers ar materials due to strikes, accident, acts of Crod, f re, unusual delays in transporCation, unavoidable casualties, causes beyond Contractor's control, or any cause which the .Agency may determine justifies the delay. The Contractor shall not be entitled to an extension in the number of calendar days for completion, unless, within five ~5}days from the beginning of such delay, he natif~es the Agency in writing of the causes of the delay, which causes must be acceptable to the Agency. JURISI~ICTII~~1vEITE This Agreement and all questions relating to its validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement shall be government and consf~rued in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Agreement has been executed a~~d ~~elivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and en l'o~Ncement of ny of t clauses of this Agreement 1 b ~ E B T ~ determined and governed. by the laws of the Mate of California. both parties further agree that orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action ar proceeding that may be brought ar arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. A.TT[]R.~E~rS FEES Should any litigation be commenced between the parties to this Contract concerning the work which is the subject of this Contract, any provision of this Contract, or the rights and obligations of either in relation thereto, the party prevailing in the litigation sha11 be entitled, in addition to such other relief as may be granted, to a reasonable sum as and for the party's attorney's fees in the litigation. Z7. TIM:E ESSEN~C'E Time is of the essence in performance of this Contract. ~E~I~E A~~ 1~U1"~~1~~ As used herein, the masculine shall include the feminine and. masculine, and the singular shall include the plural. Z9. E~CLU~~y~T~Y ~F C~N~TRACT This Contract supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to hiring of Contractor by Agency, and contains all the covenants and conditions between the parties with respect to employment of Contractor by Agency, and contains all the covenants and conditions between the parties with respect to such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Contract, acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, ar agreement, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting an behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that any other agreement or amendment to this Contract shall be effective only if executed in writing and signed by Agency and Contractor, ~a. c~s~E~L~.~~~~5 ~~~v~S~~~s a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the paver, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms ofthis Agreement, and shall indemnify Agency fully, including reasonable costs and attarraey's fees, for any injuries or damages to Agency in the event that such authority ar power is not, in fact, held by tie signatory or is withdrawn, b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. . ; ~ 5::~, ~ - EXF~B~T ~ I~ w~Tl~~~ w~I~~~F, the parties hereto have executed this Contract on the date ar~d year first above written. ATTEST; C~Mli~t~NITY REDE~ELC~PMENT ACrENCY F~~. T~F CITY CAF SANTA ANA 1Vlaria D. HCuizar Nancy T. Edwards recording Secretary Interim Executive Director APPR.C~~ED AS T~ FORIVI: CONTRACTOR Agency general Counsel Interior Demolition, Inc. ~y; Lisa E, Starch By; Nlarca Molina Assistant Counsel Title; dice President Tax ID# 95-4216~5~ ~ E~H[~~T ~ s EXHIBIT A - SCORE OF'~tORK MULTI-SITE DEMOLITION - MAY ZQ11 GENERAL CONDITIONS CONTRACTOR WILL: Obtain all required permits. Permit fees will be paid by the AGENCY. • Contact DigAlert priorta cammencingthe demolition. • Comply with all applicableSCAQMD Rulesand Regulations Attachment#~~. • Perform all work in accordancewith all applicable laws and regulations. • Execute the work in accordance with the safety provisions of all applicable laws and regulations. • Provide all labor, material, equipment, tools, supervision and technical personnel necessaryto campletethe work. Furnish theAGENCYwith the name and telephone number ofan "official" who will represent and be responsible forthe prune contractor and theirsubcontractors. • Pay far the transportation and disposal of all demolition debris. • Payall valid charges and keep the projectfree of mechanic's liens, • Protect all surroundingproperty {public and private} from damageduringthe course of thework. • Repair and/or replace materials and equipment that they damage. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR: • Knowledge atoll conditions and limitations that may affect the work, • Verifying ail measurements and quantities. • Locating all underground utilities. EQUIPMENT EMISSION STANDARDS • All on-site construction equipment shat f meet EPA Tier Z or higher emissions standards according to the following: Alf off-road diesel~powered construction equipment greater than 50 hp shali meet Tier Z off-road emissions standards. In addition, all construction equipment shall be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARE. Any emissions control device used bythe contractarshall achieve emissions reductions that are no less than what could be achieved by a Level Z ar Level 3 diesel emissions contra) strategy far a similarly sized engine as defined by CARE regulations. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS • CONTRACTOR is responsible forthoroughly examiningthe lead and asbestos reports Attachment#1}. • CONTRACTOR assumes full responsibility and liability for compliance with all federal, state and local regulations regarding the removal and disposal of hazardous materials including, but not limited to, work practices, transportation, disposal and protection of workers, visitors and neighboring property owners. ASB - Asbestos Cerfiificafiion - No contractor shall engage inasbestos-related work, as defined in Section 65x1.8 of the Labor Code, which involves 100 square feet or mare of surface area of asbestos containing materials, unless the qualifier for the license passes an asbestos certification examination. "Asbestos" as used in this section, has the same meaning as defined in Section 6501.7 of the Lobar Code. HAZ «Hazardous Subsfiance Removal Certification - No contractorshaliengage in aremoval or rernedialaction, as defined in subdivision ~d~, unless the qualifier far the license has passed an approved hazardous substance certification examination, EVERY PAGE OF THE SCOPE OF WORK MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INC[.UDED IN THEIR PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED SPECS l~tlll BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONS111E AND REJECTED. Contractor's Name Print} Contractor's Signature Date Page 1 9~5 p~af Works E~~~~~T . rF~a~ t' t' ~ ~ M~ ~r ~ ~y '.i r~f Gr ~ 1 ~ ~~~~J fr' 1 Ifs .~,7~ ~ ~ , , k ~f 1. ~ ~ yyy ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , h,. ~''r ~ VICINITY MAP ~n ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .r A; ~ ~ ~ ~ w ' ~z 3,2 r ~ Y~`~ ,~;y2 ,y j .d ~.iE Fly kiMi~ ~Y~' 4i~ ~t i a S~ ~w ~ ~~1~:~ 4~ x ~ .Iwo NO . 7~ > t ~ ~ MSS ~l" T xr,. yr qyy ~ ~ ~ C ~~I 1 X~ J 13v ~ ~ Ot Y r 4 !G1 i yIy ~ c. y h ( ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~~ ~ . R ~ L p / ~ r'~ {fir ` .y~ ) A/n VIII i ~ III ~7~y~~ yn ,'i'~ ~ Y~ o ~ ~ ~ y y ~ ~ J g ~ ~ ~a ~ as ` ~ ' ~ a -~4 Y ~M M ~ hk^. Y i 1 ~ ~ r, ~ F~ M~ ~ _ ~,4 ."Z ~4~ r 1~ ~ ,°KE Y,~'w~.. 'N`.-,~.~,~ y~~~. _ yr „~k ~ ~4 $ 31,.t ~ i v.~ S'4i 5;i xy~ fy .~y4 ~fyy. ??YnFj ~f, £ 1'S' ~~5, s M"~' `..~w '"~J~ ;i ~ y'. fir: u; r!~ ~.~n~ ~ ~ 1 - x ~ < A - j:. b, , r ~ f ti; x ~ 3 lV tS:. 'Fat., } ~ v~ ~ a ~ S ~'1 ~ut, . r~: '~4 es av~ ~x 1~?, s x~ ~ ~ k ~~ik ,v ;n.~ <"1,i Sri ~+,i ~e > _ a4, i, ~ nrnr " r,,:, i r < irr. I ,r?;. n y i y y i` Sd~ rid ~,d Aki '+~r' ~9 n,i.~ ~ ~ ~ ry N 'Y' r Y ~R~SpIS9M51/ .v ~i ,fix '"A ~Y !~4`< J' ! '.r' yy~ ~Yl ?I ~"~t ~k,F ~ r 1 I ''Yi4 r.M ~ 5~{ 1W f"Y' ~;~x$',~(( a~~'yh~.. ~a~~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ C .n~ ~ ~ ~x S'+~. t PAY r1. i "1, .•I, ~.:~t tc te« A ,/n<. ~tF <o .1 5h jyR~ ,J a <>,;y Parcel # Street Address 1 611 N. Minter Street ~ 60~ E. Sixth Street 615 E. Sixth Street Rear Duplex & Garage 4 61~ Sixth Street 5 6~0 F, Fifth Street 6 6~~ N. Garfield Street 7 8~1 F. Santa Ana. Boulevard & 7Q7 N. Garfield Street t~ Structures} Crucial Illl ilestone: Parcels 2, 3 and 4 must be completed before June 24, 2C1~.. EVERY PAGE OF THE SCOPE OF WORK MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THEIR PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED SPECS WILL BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONSIVE AND REJECTED. Contractor's Name ~Print~ Contractor's Signature Date Page ~ 9 Esc f Works E~HI~IT ~ . PARCEI. #1-~ fi11 Minter Street APN 3~8-31~.-05 Description: 13 Studio Units Parcel SF: 12,700 Total SF of Buildings: Approx. 5,6.6 5un~mary of work: Remove and dispose of the asbestos-captaining material identified in the Asbestos & lead Survey in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403. Demolish and dispose of remove all buildings and accessary structures. Item includes foundation and footings; Demolish and dispose of all underground utilities located on the parcel; Demolish and dispose of all paving and landscaping. Preserve the chain link fencing located along the south boundary of the property. Preserve the fencing located along the west boundary of the property. All metal and concrete shall be recycled. Utilities shall be properly capped at the property line and approved signed-off by the City's Building Department. All holes or depressions resulting from the demolition shall be filled with clean imported soil and compacted. The overall site shall be rough graded sa that it drains properly, 5alvage~Addendum Salvage ~remave and preserve} the following materials: Murphy beds and hardware Daor hardware Picture rail Casementwindaws in front units Kitchen cabinet and drawer knobs Door hardware ~4 x 4S" Dual sinks with farmhouse size on Claw foot tubs 5 ft Mail slots one side Kitchen light fixtures Window weights EVERY PACE OF THE SCOPE aF WoRK IVIUST BE 51GNED ~Y THE CONTRACTOR AND INCIUDED IN THEIR PROPQSAI. PROPoSA~S THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED SPECS IIIIILL BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONSIVE AND REIECTED. Contractor's Name ~Print~ Contractor's Signature Date Page 3 9 BSc f work) EH~~rT ~ PARCEI #2 - 609 E~ Sixth Street APN 398-311-OC Description: Single-Family Dwelling Parcel SF: 6,a~0 Total SF of Buildings: Approx. 90U Summary of Work: Remove and dispose of the asbestos~containing material identified in the Asbestos & lead Survey in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403. Demolish and dispose of remove all buildings and accessory structures. item includes foundation and footings; Demolish and dispose vfall underground utilities located an the parcel; Demolish and dispose of all paving and landscaping, Preserve the chain link fencing located along the south boundary ofthe property. Preserve the fencing located along the west boundary of the property, All metal and concrete shall be recycled. Dtilities shall be pr~perlycapped at the property lineand approved ~signed~offbytheCity's Building Department. All holesor depressions resulting from the demolition shall be filled with clean imparted soil and compacted, The overall site shall be rough graded so that it drains properly. Salva~eAddendum The removal ofsalvage items cif any will be handled through a change order. EvERI(PAGE OF THE SCOPE OF 1NORK MlJST BE SIGNED Bl(THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THEIR PI~OPOSA~. PROPOSALS THAT Da NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED 5PEGS 1111II.L BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONSIVE AND REJECTED. Contractor's Name Print} Contractor's Signature Date Page 4 0 9 BSc f Work} E~HI~IT ~ PARCEL#3-615 E~ Sixth Street APN 398-311-Q7 Descript'lon: Duplex Parcel 5F. 6,739 Total SF of Buildings: Approx. 97S Summary of 1~ork: Remove and disease of the asbestos-containing material identified in the Asbestos & Lead Survey in accordance with SCAC~MD Rule 1403. Demolish and dispose of remove all buildings and accessory structures except for the front dwelling {613 E, Sixth Street. This dwelling will be moved under another contract. Item includes foundation and footings; Demolish and dispose of all underground utilities located on the parcel; Demolish and dispose of all paving and landscaping. Preserve the chain link fencing located along the south boundary of the property, All metal and concrete shall be recycled. Utilities shall be properly capped at the property Tine and approved signed-off by the City's wilding Department. All holes or depressions resulting from the demolition shall be filled with clean imported soil and compacted, The overall site shall be rough graded so that it drains properly. 5alva~eAddendum The removal of salvage items cif any will be handled through a change order. EVERY PAGE OF THE SCOPE O~ 1NORK MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THEIR PROPOSAL, PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED SPECS WILL BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONSIVE AND REJECTED, Contractor's Name Print} Contractor's Signature Date Page 5 9 BSc f vVork~ ~~H~BIT 1 PARCEL #4 - 617 E. Sixth Street APN 3~8-311-OS Address. 617 F. Sixth Street Description: Single-family Dwelling Parcel SF: 4,473 Total SF of Buildings: Approx. 765 Summary of work: Remove and dispose of the asbestos-containing material identified in the Asbestos & Lead Survey in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1443, Demolish and dispose of remove all buildings and accessary structures. Item includes foundation and footings; Demolish and dispose ofall underground utilities located on the parcel; Demolish and dispose of all paving and landscaping. Preserve the chain link fencing located along the south boundary of the property. All metal and concrete shall be recycled. Utilities shall be properly capped at the property line and approved signed-off bythe City's Building Department. All holes or depressions resulting from the demolition shall be filled with clean imported soil and compacted. The overall site shall be rough graded so that it drains properly. Sa_Ie_Addendum The removal of salvage items cif any will be handled through a change order. EVERY PAGE ~F THE SCQPE of VVQRI~ MUST SIGNED ~Y THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THEIR PRaPOSAI.. PRQPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED SPECS WILL BE CONSIDERED NDNMRESPONSIVE AND REJECTED Contractor's Name €Print~ Contractor's Signature Date Page ~ ~ fsc~ vuorky E~H ~ B!T ~ PARCEI 6Z0 E~ Fifth Street APN 3~8-338-a5 Description: Single-Family Dwelling {currently converted into three units~,1 Detached Unit and garage Parcel SF: ~,25~ Total SF of Buildings: Approx. 2,374 {does not include detached unit and garage Summary of work; Remove and dispose of the asbestos-containing material identified in the Asbestos & lead Survey in accordance with SCAQMD Rule ~.4D3. Demolish and dispose of remove all buildings and accessary structures. Item includes foundation and footings; demolish and dispose of all underground utilities located on the parcel; Demolish and dispose of all paving, landscaping and the wall located slang the west boundary of the property, Preserve the chain link fencing located along the north and south boundaries of the property and the fencing along the south boundary ofthe property. All metal and concrete shall be recycled. Utilities shall be properly capped at the property line and approved {signed-off by the City's Building Department. All holes ar depressions resulting from the demolition shall be filled with clean imported sail and compacted. The overall site shall be rough graded so that it drains properly. Salvage alternate Salvage {remove and preserve} the following materials: Staircase banister Shelves and drawers from partial Dining room molding built in Hardware from doors between Fireplace with mirror mantle and Picture rail throughout parlors surround Pillars from room divider Door hardware {second floor} Bathroom chair rail {second floor} Diamond window and molding on Window weights {second floor stairway EVERY PAGE OE THE SCOPE of WORK MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THEIR PROPt~SAL. PROPOSALS THAT D4 NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED SPECS WILL BE CONSIDERED NaNwRESPONSIVE AND REJECTED. Contractor`s Name {Print} Contractor's signature Date Page 7 BSc f vuark~ EX~# B ~T 1 PARCEL #6 6~3 N. Barfield Street APN 898-813-D4 Description: Front Building i~ Units}, Rear Building Unity, Detached Garage Parcel SF: 7,500 Total SF of Buildings: Approx.1,92~ does not include garage} Summary of work: Remove and dispose of the asbestosWcontaining material identified in the Asbestos & Lead Survey in accordance with SCAC~MD Rule 14Q8, Demolish and dispose of remove all buildings and accessory structures. Item includes faundatian and footings; Demolish and dispose of all underground utilities located on the parcel; Demolish and dispose of all paving and landscaping. Preserve all of the boundary fencing. All metal and concrete shall be recycled. Utilities shall be properly capped at the property line and approved signed-off bythe City's Building Department. All holesor depressions resultingfrom the demolition shall be filled with clean imported soil and compacted to 90% relative compactian~. The overall site shall be rough graded so that it drains properly. Sa1va-ge Alternate Salvage remove and preserved the following materials; UnitA UnitB UnitC Door and window trims Kitchen cabinet glass doors Il~lindaw weights Mass front kitchen built-in Door and window trims Five panel doors Five panel doors vllindows, weights, tracks and Daor Hardware ~5ecand Floor} pulleys Bathroom light fixture vUindows, weights, tracks and pulleys EVERY PAGE OF THE SCOPE OF WORK MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THEIR PROPOSAh PROPOSALS THAT Do NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED SPECS WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE AND REJECTED, Contractor's Name ~Print~ Contractor's Signature Date Page 8 ~9 {Sc~f INork~ ~~H ~ ~ T PARCEL. -Sol E, Santa Ana Boulevard & 707 Ne Garfield Street APN 398-303-04 Address: 8Q1 Santa Ana Blvd. and 707 N. Garfield Street Description.: Front Building ~1 Unit}, Rear Building ~1 Unit}, Attached Garage Parcel SF: 5,000 Total SF of Buildings, Approx,1,370 does not include garage} Summary of 1Nork: Remove and dispose of the asbestos-containing material identified in the Asbestos & Lead Survey in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403. Demolish and dispose of remove all buildings and accessary structures. Item includes foundation and footings; Demolish and dispose ofall underground utilities located on the parcel; Demolish and dispose ofall paving and landscaping. Preserve all ofthe baundaryfencing. All metal and concrete shall be recycled. Utilities shall be properly capped at the property line and approved signed-off by the City's Building Department. All holes or depressions resultingfrom the demolition shall be filled with clean imported soil and compacted, The overall site shall be rough graded sa that it drains properly. No Sa Ivag-e Alternate EVERY PAGE 01" THE SCOPE 0~ WORK MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THEIR PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT Dq NOT CONTAIN THE SIGNED SPECS It111LL BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONSIVE AND REJECTED. Contractor's Name ~Print~ Contractor's Signature Date Page 9 9,~c~~f V~ork} ~~,H~iT ~ THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 4 - 22 L~ , t~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~~ ~0 ~ ~ ~ ~ NTH sT. e° 5TH 5T. w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ rx ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a X11 North Linter Street X09 East Sixth Street S East Sixth Street Rear D~~lex & Garage) X17 East Sixth Street ~0 East i*ifth Street p 6~3 North Garfield Street 801 East Santa Ana Bouieuard 707 North Garfield Street ~~~I~~ ~ FUNDING ANALYSIS DEI~IOC.ITION OF EIGHT PROPERTIES Interior Demalitian, InG. Contract $8,535.00 Contingencies $15,10?'.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 94 ~4~r00 Exhibit 3 STATION DISTRICT PROJECT hilSl"ORICAL ~?SSESSMENT PREPARED FOR: CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING AND BUILDING AGENCY 2p ~evec CEN°rE~ P~aza., Ross ANNOC M-20 P.O. Box 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFOF2NIA 9270 ^G PREPARED BY: SAPPHG7S ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 430 NoRrH HAts'r~.o S'rREEr PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 9 I I O7 EXHIBIT 4 Mar c, zca i t 4 - 25 r~~~F~c~~~Ts s~~r~~ws ES EXECU 1 I~E SU~EY{! \R 1 •.,....r..rr......r.s..r..r...rra...aaar..r..a..•.r....a...•...... s.... v..ea.... rrr.. o. r..s•r.•. ES~1 1.o INTRODUCTION ar.s.r...r...r.....r.ra•.•...•.r..r..••r.r..sr•r•r..r....r..........r....r.......r..r....r..rr...r.r....a.. 1M1 1.1 Purpose...o.r..r....n.rrer....rr....•.........•..•.....r..r.r..rrr.....rr...v••.r.r..••.••.rrrrr.r..v...r......a....a. 1-1 1 r2 SCape r..r....r..r.......r....r..r....r?......r..r...,...r....r.......r..r.a.rr..r....r..r..a..•............•....r.r..r. 1-2 2so PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...............rr.r...,...r...a........ra..r....ra.........•...........r........r.rrr.....r..•••• ~-1 2.1 Project Location .r..,.......r.a..r.......r..r....r..r...,r......,r..r....r.......r..r........r..a........r.r...... ~-1 2.2 Project Description ...•.r..r......rr.r••....• ...........................r..r.,..r..r....r...,...,,..r...r.......r ~-1 3.o REGULATORY FRAMEWORK.r..r.......r...,...r....r..r....r..re...r..r..•....r..r.•..........r....rrrr.r.r..r.•.•.3-1 3.1 Federal .r......a•rr.......r..r.r..r....r..r..•.¦.......r.......r..r...,r......r........rr..e......r......•.•...........3-1 3.1.1 National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 X16 USC 47ay .r..rr...rr......ar.....3-1 3.1.2 National Register of Historic Places•...••rv.r.rr.r...r...r...v........r..r....r..rr..r.r...ra 3-1 3.1.3 Secretary of the [nterior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Prapert~es .r..r....r..r....r..rr...r..r....r..r..eer..r....r.......r..rr.a.......•.r...e•s..•.....r.r...r.3-~ 3.2 State ......•.......r..r•,..r•rv..•r.rr....r..r...rr..r....r..rr......r....r.er....,..rr..er..r....rr..r...rr..r....ara... 3-2 3.2.1 California Environmental duality Act....r.......ra...r............r......r..,.r..r..r.r...r 3-~ 3.2r2 California Register of Historical Resources ........rr..r..r.rr.....n.r....•..rr.r•.•ra..,.3-3 3.2r3 California Historical Landmarks ....r ...............r.............................r...rr.....r. 3-~ 3.2.4 California Points of Historical Interest ....rr..,,.r........r...rr..r....rn.rn......r......... 3-4 3.3 City of Santa Ana....r.....r.r........r..•...rr•...••.r.r.r.¦r......r..r....rr.r.r..a.?rrr...r.?,.e..r..r..,.....r 3-5 3.3.1 Santa Ana General Plan .r....,..r...,r.......r...r.r.r..r....r .............•......•...rr......•...3-5 3.3.2 Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties...........r..r....r.....n.r..........r...n•...3-7 I,o ~~TH~V~..r.rr..r..••.s.a....r.......•r......•..•..r...r.r...rr.r,o.rr..r?•..r.........r•r.r.•r••arr•.r•..r•vr....r..r..r*rpr*~-1 4r1 Archival Research and Literature Review..........r..rr...........r..........r.....•....n............4~1 4r2 Pedestrian Survey ....r ..........................r....r.......rr..rr..r.......r..r....r..r....rr.........r........4-2 ~.3 Evaluafi~an rr.rr•rrr....rr.•..r...rr....•....r••..•r•r.•r.rr••rr•..r....•rr..r....r..r.. r. r... r. ?r r.?. r.,....r...r. r.. F-3 4.3.1 Use of Criteria of Significance.rrrr....rrr..•...rrn...........r......r....••....ra............r.4-3 4.3.2 Required Levels of Integrity...,..rr...,........r..r......r....rr.r ...................rr.r...r....4-3 4.4 Personnel...•.r....r..r......rr...........r..........r....r.........,rr.r....r...,r...,...r..r....r..r....r..r.....•.4-5 5ra RESULTS..r....r..r............r..r......rr.......r...rr ......................ra..r.r..........r.......r..r..r.r..rr...r.....rr..5-1 5.1 Historic Uverview: Development of the Lacy Neighborhood, 1 X95--1930..r........ 5-1 5.2 Previous Research r.......rrr........r.rr.....r.r•......r..r....r.rr ..............rr...rr..rr..,r..rr...r.r..r..r 5-3 5r2r1 Previously Designated Historical Resources .......................r.......r...r.r...r..5-3 5,2,2 Previously Conducted Surveys....r....r..e....r.rr••..•....r.r........r..rr•..r.....ea.•...rv. 5~3 5.3 Assessments of Individual Significance of 23 Puildings..r...rr..rr..e,..rr...r......arnrr..r 5-10 5,3.1 501 East Fifth Street 1 Whitson Powelson House r.r......r..r....r.r.•........v••.r. 5-11 5.3.2 505 East Fifth Street .r.......r..rr...r..r....r..,r...r..rav..........r..r.......r.....••.•r...r•..r 5-1 5.3.3 6a1-643 East Fifth Street ....•...,...r.....r ..............rr.,.......rr...,,.,r...,.•.r.....r...5-13 5.3.4 61 D-612 East Fifth Street ..r.bfr.•.•.,r..e..•......r..•D..rr..N.?.rrlr••... PT T... ?•r.YO.. 5"~1 3 5.3.5 6' 15 61' East Fifth Street ..r.•r...rr,.r....r..r....r......ar...e. e. r..e.•.•.. r. •....rr.rr.rr.. J 1 1 5.3.6 V"2a East Fifth Street ••r........•.rr...r..r...•r..rr..rr..r....r..r.... r..r.... r..r....r..e...,....• 514 5.~.! l,/L1 E(,.~.~t Fifth Street r..r..rrf.ra.n•.•or.rr••.~r•.r..•rr•rrr•..r..r.... v.?r.... r.?a....r.+, ?.....5 1 5 Station District Project Historical Assessment flay 6, 1 ~ Sapphos ~nviranmen~al, Inc. UIl:1P~OJECTS11~7111471-~~7~Documents4Nr'storical Assessme~~tlF~~~aIIT~C,Doc Page i 5.3.5 712 East Fifth Street .....1.11..111!.11111111111.1/.1{/./?11(111111/PA?../1...R...AA.1...1?.1..1/.. 5-15 5.3.9 X09 East Sixth Street..........1..11.1..1111111..1.1.11...1111111111.•1{.A/1/1f1..AA1.11..11?11.1/11 5~1 51311 0 ~1 3 East Sixth Str4.+et..IkE.11..1...N1.1/,.N........I.../...I..........I..../......,N1 ..............1 5-1 1! 513!1 1 V / J Ea~L Sixth St~V/etP.1....1.../..,..1.1....01....,....../1.../....{...e. P. v...Y...,.. ?e.. P.., 5~1 5.3.1 ~ 710 East Sixth Street ..............1.11a..11s1.1.11{{11{1•{1{1.f...111.{1l/fA/1f/f/AA..1.1.f/....l.. 5-18 5.3.13 7Y1' 4 East Sixth Street ..........................1......./....N,.N.......1.,...111.......11.1......1.. 5-15 5.31 14 7L~o Eat Si~fih StrAJet1......1...1../\..1....1.....+.l..N1..Nl..N.....n.......1.1P...A..1./....1..... 5-19 5.3.15 911 Brown Street...1{111.111..IR?.AR.11?1/11.711...1..117..!.!/.f.111111...1..11.1.1..{..1{........ 51-1 5.3.16 X23-525 Nolrth Garfield Street.......R..R1........11..1....1..1..1......1....1..1......{,/{715-2D 5.3/ 1/ 7 0 7 1 \ o r t h V a r f i V I d Street . I 1 N 1. e 1 1 1 1 N N P 1 N N 1 5- h D 5.3.11 Soy Nor~h ii{inttilr Streefip.l..{i.....1.......1./.?/..AIR../?.N1..1./..1...11...1...1.1......1..1..5-Lwo 5.3.19 507 North Ntinter Street........,1...........11.1{1.111!.f..{1{.1.IIf1/f1{{fl/lrlll.l{.11..A.e?1.5-21 513120 X11 North Il~~inter Street..111NI...1.......Rk.N...1..•e..1.R.•...........?..../14...1..0/..8....1.. 5-~~ 513121 501 North I1#ortililer Street!./{...1..11...1..1....1..1/...1..1{..A{..R.... R..R.e..,.........,}1. ~"InJ / 583.22 508--51 o North Porter Street 1.171/11...{1.11/fl1/f1ANfNAR.?1.?.?1..11f/11.11...7..If.1.../..16 5-23 5.3.23 801 East Santa Ana Boulevard ............./.......1..../..1{.......1...1eA/llfl//./.eRl.f...1 5-23 5.4 Potential Historic District Analysis ........1 .................1..............N.../R..R...N...R..........5-23 ~.o REFERENCESI,..1.........11.11{1.{{111.{P.{...1{1.1{1?///1/6?.ff.{1/?ll..f{/..7...111.71..f¦.1¦.P.1/?.../.f8....eAff./17.1.?..G-1 T~4~~~5 PAGE ES-1 Individual Assessments of Significance .R.......R...1 ...............................1........8.1.1(.,............ ES-1 5.211-1 Designated Historical Resources in the Station District....1.1..R/...1 ...................................NB 5r3 5.2.2-1 Previous Historical Assessments of 23 Buildings under Consideration in the Station D~striCt Area./......1.•..•...R.i..\..tll.•«....1.• .............11.d..•s.a.1..•.....01...111.11.1../{1111(..1/11{/.¦{.\.•.PA\/ie./ 5-5 5.3-1 Individual Assessments of Significance .....1 .................r.•..•./...rr...1..88..1.......A.1.f1....1..111111. 5w1 FlG~IRE~ F~L~.C~~~IG PAGF /2.1-1 Regional Location I~ap .................1•.P.P11......88•.1...11..8...RR...8...8P..N.......1...1..1....11.11........./Ie/A.2-1 .1F'w.1 Lo Val ¦ icinity Map II/f.111lf/e•11..IN.7..8.1/.e1...8.d..•.18..1.... .......e.. 1 ..............11..1.......8...........,.... i..~ +F~ 11 r3 1 01.,70~rµYJh~c ' . Ra~ I.A {IS\A{ P.?f l.?A 1.1 1.1 e. s.11 .111..{ I.Y f..\f e. if A{ /.I..f.A..N rP..{.1. I. r.. R.. f...a R., .ls.... s•1.1• ! 1r .1..-1 Deivelopfinent Proposal i.........N..{.a...aq.a....1R11/. Pi1R.I.tl/.l{P.11/i111..{/\\1.1.{11\1...{l1?f /.A 111..A.A 1P 111?1/11Yf 1 2.2-2 Historical Assessment Properties .............R...1/•88N../.N.8.0............1......P..•..111111.11111/0.1./11.1{....®L-1 5/4~A-1 Construction Dates/11.//./•11....Il.f1...11.7/.A.1..88..e/.tl1..111.../.•e.......1/.......0....../{..tl/../N..1............1 5-24 5. 1 iw Significant Properties in the Station District ..I/.I ...f 1..6a {.f 11.1.1 /A /.11 /A 1.111.ae...I Pe..A.a 1...A.a....... 5~1u Jf,~ A PPFIVD~C€~ A Resumes of ICey Personnel B California Historic Resources Inventory DPR 523 Forms Station [~~~strr~::t Project N~,~~orrcal ,~ssessmer~~ fay ~G~11 Sapphos nv~ronm~nta~, inc. iN;~PRC~J~c~T~.~l~4~~~~471-OQ7~Dc~cumentslNrs~arical,~ssessment~FinallTaC.Doc ~agc ii ~~~~~.I r ~ This Historical Assessment was prepared to determine if redevelopment of 23 buildings located on 19 parcels owned by, or potentially owned by, the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency Agency} in Santa Ana, California, would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA~ Guidelines. The 23 buildings are located in the Station District area of the lacy neighborhood of the City. The Historical Assessment addresses Ntitigation Measure 4.4-3 of the City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code LSD S4A and SD84B} Environmental Impact Report ~EIR~, certified by the City of Santa Ana City} on June 7, 2010. An intensive level historic resources survey of the 23 affected buildings was performed between September 2010 and April 2011 to determine if any significant historic h resources would be adversely affected by the redevelopment project. The s~~rvey encompassed site inspections, photography, research, and documentation an State of California Historic Resources Inventory forms. Properties were evaluated under National Register of Historic Places ~NRHP}, California Register of Historical Resources ~CRHRy, and City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties ~SARHP} criteria Of significance. Two Sapphos Environmental, Inc. architectural historians GMs. Leslie Neumann and Ms. Marline Fratinardo7 who meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards conducted the study. As a result of the investigation, seven ~7} properties were identified as historical resources, as defined by CEQA and sixteen ~16~ properties were determined not to be historical resources: TA~.E ES-~ NNI~IVIDU~4L ASSESS~ENT~ ~F SIGNIF~~~N~E - ~t E~~l~ far Ad~r~ss ~i ~~i ible ~~igihe ~esin~t~~r~' 501 Fast Fifth Street x x 505 East Fifth Street ~ 601-603 East Fifth Street ~ G1 D-612 East Fifth Street ~ 615-617 East Fifth Street x 620 East Fifth Street 621 Fast Fifth Street x 71 ~ East Fifth Street x 649 East Sixth Street x 613 East Sixth Street 617 East Sixth Street x 710 East Sixth Street ~ 714 East Sixth Street ~ 720 Fast Sixth Street x 911 Brown Street ~ 623-b25 North Garfield Street 707 North Garfield Street x 505 North Minter Street ~ 507 North Minter Street x 611 North Minter Street x 507 North Mortimer Street 508-51 B North Porter Street x 801 Fast Santa Ana Boulevard ~ Stafiion District Protect Nrstorical Assessment May 6, 2Q 11 Sap~hos Pn~riranmental, Inc. 4~/;iPR~JE~TSl1~7141471-OQ7IDoccamentslNistoi~ica~ Ass~~ssmentlFinal~Q fxecuti~re Summary.Doc Page ~SWr In addition, it was determined, based on the results o~ the intensive level survey of the selected properties and a windshield survey of the Station District as a whole, that na historic district exists in the study area, Station District Project Nrstorical,~ssessment ~~a~ 6, X017 Sa~~hos ~nviror~mental, lnc. ~PRD~~CTS~ 14?~ 1l X471-007~DQCUrnentsl.~istorical Assessr~entl~ina~l4 f~ecutive Summa~y.Dc~c gage Sµ~ ~~Cf~U`~~1~J~' 1.1 PURPOSE This Historical Assessment was prepared to determine if redevelopment of Z3 buildings located an 19 parcels owned by, ar potentially owned by, the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency Agency} in Santa Ana, California, would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15oG4.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA} Guidelines. The 2~ Agency-owned buildings are located within the boundaries of the approximately 450-acre Transit Zoning Cade LSD 84A and SD 84B} project area, which was analyzed in the City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Cade LSD 84A and SD 846} Environmental impact Report HEIR}, certified by the City of Santa Ana City} on June 7, X010. The Transit Zoning Code LSD 84A and 84B} project is intended "to provide coning for the integration of new infiil development into existing neighborhoods, to allow for the reuse of existing structures, to provide far a range of hauling options, including affordable housing, and to provide atransit-supportive, pedestrian-oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure."' The EIR also analy,~ed a Development Proposal to redevelop 49 parcels owned by, and 20 parcels potentially being acquired by, the Agency. The 23 buildings that are the subject of this Historical Assessment are a component of the Development Proposal and are located within the Station District, a 94-acre section of the Transit Zoning Code project area. The EIR concluded, "The adoption of the Transit .Zoning Cade LSD 84A and SD 84B} could result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 150G4.5 of the CEQA Guidelines." Mitigation N~easure 4.4-3 was adopted to reduce the impact as far as feasible; ~M 4.4-3 Prior to development activities that would demolish ar otherwise physically affect buildings or structures 5a years old or older or affect their historic setting, the project applicant shall retain a cultural resource professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History to determine if the project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15a~4.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the cultural resource professional and the City of Santa Ana, the appropriate archival research, including, if necessary, an updated records search of the South Central Coastal Information Center ~SCCIC} of the California Historical Resources Information System €CHRIS} and a pedestrian survey of the proposed deveiapment area to determine if any significant historic-period resources would be adversely affected by the proposed development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any historical resources within the development area and includes recammendationsond methods for eliminating ar reducing impacts on historical resources. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City Santa Ana far approval. As determined necessary by the City, City of Santa Ana, California. May ~O1 D. transit honing Code fSD 84A and SD 84B} Enviror~menta! 1m~act Report. 5CH No. ~~~6~71104. Prepared by; PBS & J, l.os Angeles, CA. volume 1: Draft EfR, p, 1-1. Station District Project Historical Assessment day i 1 Sapp#~as Fnviror~rner~tal, lr~c. VII;IPRO)FCTSI )47~~ t4~1-0~711c?cc~r ~~~ntslNistorical Assessmer~t[Fina#~ 1 lntro~uction.loc Page 1-1 environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentatian~ prepared for future development within the project site shall reference ar incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible far implementing methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources identified in the technical report or n~emorandurn. Such methods could include, but not be limited to, written and photographic recordation of the resource in accordance with the level of Historic American Buildings Survey ~HABS7 documentation that is appropriate to the significance local, state, nationals of the resource, This Historical Assessr~ent has been prepared to address MM 4.4-3e The City retained Sapphas Environrental, Inc. to prepare the report. The Historical Assessment was prepared by Ms. Marline Fratinardo with peer review by Ms~ (-eslie Neumann, bath of wham meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional dual if icatians Standards for Architectural History. The Sapphas Environmental, Inc, cultural resources group, managed by Ms. Neumann, is knowledgeable of the history and architectural history of Santa Ana, having provided an-call historic resources consulting services to the City since 20D6. Ms. Heuma.nn has also served as the City's historic preservation consultant since 20D1 Appendix A, resumes a~ Key Personnel}, S~~PE This Historical Assessment considers the potential significance under federal, state, and local criteria of 23Agency-owned, or potentially owned, buildings; + 501 East F fifth Street 505 East Fifth Street • 6o1-6D3 East Fifth Street ~ ~ 1®-~ 12 East F fifth Street ~ 615-617 East Fifth Street ~ 620 East Fifth Street ~ 621 East Fifth Street 712 East Fifth Street ~ 609 East Sixth Street ~ 613 East S i xth Street ~ 617 East Sixth Street ~ 71 D East Sixth Street ~ 714 East Sixth Street ~ 720 East Sixth Street ~ 911 Brown Street 623-625 North Garfield Street 707 North Garfield Street ~ 505 N arch Minter Street ~ 507 North Minter Street ~ 611 N arch Minter Street ~ 5D7 North Mortimer Street ~ 50851 o North Porter Street ~ 801 East Santa Ana Boulevard Station District Project Historical Assessment May .01 ~ Sapphos ~nvironmer~tal, Inc. ~11;1PI~C~JC~~S11471 ~ 147 ~-~D71Doeumentsl~f istorical Assessmentl~inalll In~~~o~crctian. Dac €'age 1-2 The analysis consists of a summary descriptian of the Development Proposal in the Station District; an overviev~ of the regulatory framewark that guides the decisian-making process to be undertaken by the pity, including historic designation criteria at the federal, state, and lacal level; a description of the n~ethads employed to support the identification and evaluation of historical resaurces~ and a detailed discussion o the results a~ the evaluatian of historical resources. Station C~istrict Pr~~jec:::~;~~ Nis~orical Asses Ament May Za 1 ~ ~ Sap~f~os Environmer~ta~', ln~. ~:IP~~/CTSI ~4~f 1l ~ ~_t~07lDocur~ents~Historrca~ AssessmentlFinal4~ fntro~uction.Doc ~'a~e 1~-3 ~~~r»n~ .~,a PR~~ECT ~]~~CR1PT~~~IV ~.1 PRA ECT L~C~T[~~I The Transit Zoning Code LSD S4A and SD B4B~ project is located in the central area of the City of Santa Ana, in grange County, California, approximately 10 miles from the Pacific Ocean Figure 2.1-1, i~.egional Location Nlap7. The Transit Zoning Cade project is generally bounded by First Street, Flower Street, Civic Center C~rive, Grand Avenue, and Interstate 5 ~I-5, Santa Ana Freewayy in the City of Santa Ana. The project is approximately 0.6 mile southwest of I-5 and comprises aver 1 oa blacks and 45a acres. within the Transit Zoning Cade area, the Station District comprises approximately 94 acres. Irregular in shape, the Station District is roughly bounded by Civic Center Drive to the north; Terminal Street and Fuller Street to the east; Fifth Street, Brawn Street, and Sixth Street to the south; and Bush Street to the west Figure 2.1-~, Local Vicinity N1ap7. The Station District appears on the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute series South Gate, California, topographic quadrangle Figure 2.1-~, Topographic Map~.~ The topography of the site can be generally characterized as flat. PROJECT ~7E~~RIPTI~I~I The Transit Zoning Cade project provides the zoning changes necessary to support the long-term development of a successful transit program in the City of Santa Ana and establishes a developrr~ent framework far the redevelopment of properties awned by the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency ~Agencyy. The Development Project is located in the vicinity of Santa Ana Boulevard within the Station District and incorporates the redevelopment of 4~ parcels owned by the Agency at the time of the certification of the Environmental Impact Report ~EIR~, plus 20 additional properties whose acquisition by the Agency would complete the assemblage of properties an these blacks in which the Agency already has majority ownership and would secure property far open space Figure 2.2-1, Development Proposal. The concept for the Development Project is a maximum of 155 rental units and a maximum of b5 far-sale units---a total of 220 new residential units, a percentage that will be affordable pursuant to the County of grange's criteria far low- to moderate-income housing. The Agency is also pursuing the addition of new public open space that could include a public park, a public tot lot, and a 0,000-square-foot community building. The redevelopment of these properties requires the demolition of approximately 30,243 square feet of .building area on 15 Agency-owned parcels. In addition, the anticipated Francis Xavier Residence, located on the southeast corner of Santa Ana Boulevard and Garfield Street, could be constructed on an additional Agency-awned parcel, requiring the demolition of two additional buildings. This Historical Assessment addresses 1 ~ parcels within the Station District containing 23 buildings that may be affected by implementation of the Development Proposal, the Francis Xavier Residence, or potential future development under a Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center Master Plan Figure 2,2-2, i~istorical Assessment Propertr'es~. ' U.S. Geological Survey. ~1905J Photo revised 19~1.7a5~Minute Series, South Gate, California, Topographic Quadrangle. Reston, VR. ~ City of Santa Rna, California. May 2410, Transit Zoning Code ~S[~ 84A and SD S~B~ Final environmental Impact Report, 5CN Na. 200607110x. Prepared by: PBS & J, Las Angeles, CR. Volume 1a, p. 9-1. Station District Project Y Historical Assessment May 6, 2011 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. VV:1PRgJ~C~S1147111471-007IUocurnents~HistaricalAss~~ss~~~ntll~inall2 Project Descriptian.~ac Page 2-1 r.la n.E.i 'r. n~ s 'ra dr ; rr..'.' c ! a+7 r, cq. ' ~ .:S Y s 'G . C... -Y... .r.. S "?IS}. I. u:. -r ,..,..1 k; .LAC., , 'Lf.. Y7.. ~ryf ,I r I.,... T.. T'C' t., a7,.r"3.'i. !G.y,r »a.. :r.... 7'~dF~a".'..t,tE....: .ruG.-., .-....f... rs 'f - ! i:.. r;. a...,. . r .d. S~ c 2'a,;.... 1.. iZ, s . , , ~ ! r 'h .r r'A .r,... , u, , r. r'n_. a d7F. »..E` .?c4. f.. r,. .rT.u .u.x. - 1. <;`~f.. E ..r ..n, i f _.,,~,.~.zr } ri r ...-c.. i~k } . A~;-N .r.:~,. ~ r.. 3. _ H!',a s4, .a7 , 1;..~ v. r,~ n c E s 5~ tn, w ,W . _ . 'ti.~...,..... Mtg.. W'"~I, ~ L~,:~ .~.,..1. n,., :..r..,..,: .f.~., s,, a. :,,a,Ft° ~°I - . ..~JJ,.. r.f s,r 1 ~,„~r~(p, ...1 r. s Y r. ,4 `ar»~~, l 'p eG :'.N r r..i rHrJ«p ~ .rYCx. 5p~~ I tS".. 1" t...,..,.0. r V~-r,:G ( r, ~.}t i ..~rg ..4,[~f1 ~:L: ~ 4.:.f1. ~ >',YAR, , 13~ ~ rGtc.: S, ~ l... Y ~ St~ r, .!-M. 3" LAS •4.. . r'5,.. .s_«3^13 1, „rr~.1 .1--.:. 'k_. r. xr .sr'.-:. ..__t(. , ...-i.S;r. r...:r.. :nrs i<.r ' 7'"r<r,•°~.. -Ka ~.r »ar. . n r 't, - i'''$F~nt _c..r , ~`l. £ k r...y~„¢ :'W. )r..r4. ~ .!Bi R. !4 r p ~.SS~ iJi f.3, a tt~ r 1~ '.L~. `rc .W •rk.S~r,~k,a~t,.,k s .i~? [ 1 1 n t: a `H . .k. ~3 ,1_ ~lr : s M.ut-. . ra l~r'r ~ ,r. 'fitr . .,,..,..v, I r:::hS ,~l F ,~~.':r~w r..: ~{r~,;z ~rq~•,~,. ..>f!'! E'af .C :~F ~';.:.1 •~i.„.s ,y!.~_~. !n i..... ~r€~. sl,. I¢~srtr '~s F~.,. ..rr Y£? '~..F~h.,: Q. .'F'rf rrl l .iv. r5.~v A h 1. .."r-, . e V•''irc•>/ 4 _ rP.. ~d)f':~... itL (:.A !f [-..r'r <,tlcF ',C ~ - nz u.sk4 ;~%4Y'!:y E Ma 9xr•n~r..; ny ic~. ~.n ~ " rr a.:~''., 'u.' ;:i~ ~Ec,-x!r. ti3. • "C ~ aul ;.f r1. ..2 >k gc,_ rt. ~.n. atc it ~.4C4- u±i... t a ,..a1 s. x~•x r~i:. ..r--:. ! E ,all >it`»' r . "iY~,..; a4 r t} .k~ r ...t r. ,si~i E sA ~ 1`~ v 4 'w~ rG a~~ tZ~ -1, A ~ li 2»3..:: ~s s, r.,„,'..`"th. ~GUim i' Is7i~r,~,tnC' ~4t~ S I .'~.r'~ ,r , s>r~„`» , si a f, s ; r 4 _ 't~ µx ~ij'>'~ xr:£~c}d ~fril~ 1",. s~ ti 1 r ~ I s r ` ~ f F,r £ - ~ m{tt~riU r54 _ u Sl`~ ~L Mapped ~ r A1, 1 T~ 1 r r ~~r, >r hJ ~3 Area ~ ~ ~ 14 ' ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ r '~-yr~i „yt - ~ t~ . ~ .4a. ' ~ ~rw4spt4au4ki 4erusn a7k.c'rr• . U - w~rc~ r• £y~,yr~, r ~ "as~' 4' ~ ~'S R ~s'wu.%"AF .n " F41 I. ~r r~ b4'a':S1TNk?r;i•~2'~vsh.~. 'm ~ `R `x'" r n ~ ~ _ r ~~k~M~~~. 'W:~;"N. Ir A ~ T.i. ,3 k r Y3tl" a ~E~r,a rJ. cr IL ~~~`J ~ N.n!?i~N,~'ltN ~E . ,n. ut# ~ ICs)m:. 15,~. .`n~. teE it ~ 4; ~ ~~Et% .t . Y ~ g~J f 1 wy ~c341'~Ma~+T ~ z f s i r~sr ^N~~ 1 i ' r U " Y~. : + A ~,;?r.~-J 'rp+FLVnk rsl~w .J?KMS N~' fil~tlb' i : ~ 'n: ~~~~Y, y~~v'vff~ A tii ~ ,CC ~ ! ,~~~'~>HU~n~'~ ` " f r~' Spa 4~` _ y~q~j~ ~ ~ ~'M/ ~ .c,y~~~~ ~ ~ a "~#xr~rii~{ ~ lz~` ~un~ s7 ~F 6 Ac U i~,~~ f daif~ rvh' F x~ ~ E k i~v u"N i r ~rb "F i < - k:.. d r- IE ~r~s nr P~sN y : "~~ll~ "a`~`'N' t4 i ~Fd~ : ]$.r(4r Fla v.a Lt~'~' ~ 7F u.. tisr . ~ r to ~ t r ~ ~r"I x i ,tF7 ~ wy 4 4 i„, I L~H H~^'tssE F~~.u n~ qtr ,x~ 7 T ~.F ~~IA ~,~~LpF, ~ ~ i r u5 F ~1rstF~~ n.~u~A~ x~F 1 1 a ~ '11111 ~ : ~ a~~ _ ~ i ~ I~~ 3 E Y~~£ i u r. cIA-~. ~¢rf~ ~ t 4 1 :G ~7-u t x r •x '<.,rv 'ilrct~, r~~~7i'~€kAr~ r r~~1 -r 4r - i' ,i.'r ~v f2~ ~ a ~F !a v~.pt~;r ~~~,r1...' f ~i 1 ~ ''~~s~r E` ~~r.~h'.'. '~s#- r n~n~~ •4"'I'~'vIJ° ,g-%.:,rt~ t't {`til '~~}1 ~E' ~ r ~f~ n: ss'1Wf- r.'Ir z`~~~r, ~ r ~s r-~'~' yr.~=-4 - ,£t:-: 'S a~ ` i.~._~ _ ~ 4r,.~ ~~,c "5::! ~y`~'k~ ;:.i ~ iE~~~.4~jP1•"- L~ r'~ _ ~ _ ,fin e i?i.'k,~s, T~S~ .rr ! r7~E,yh 1 r .r ~1{ c • ~ Afr 14 1 nk~cur~l {s'~k~rw ~.e~-~~~'~ 1~~r ~ ~4 ~ s c r 1 i~'~ s r: ~.y `~'r~ ! 1 ~ ;r~ t» ~in 1rrtA1 an L~~{if 1 ~ r ~n ~'5~~ ~E s , A ~~1 s "r~~ Li ~~~r yt~>'H1,~~~'R! ~ r1~W~T~"~f ~la'it 1 L w~+4, ~~'1X1'`~ ~ ~r z ~kk ~ ,4~'r~rCZ~ ~u ~ : ,l~tl~~ ~ ; •f~~~ i,~ '~,s~Asx ~ ~ sk ~~>HrGr. n u 1 ~ h ~ 1 r an'`"is~ -urn TJ ~ I ~ n ~s _ ~ k.. r•~~,r i y.s m~„ ~~s ~~epf ~~r }Ifi i 2~~ _ ' k 1 is s~~ A c 9 r~ a~ '1 r r ~ ~ r. v~ ~~~5~~paA~ 1~ k ~ ~rS~ i''~'F r` 1 r w~ I xs ~tr~,-, ~ ~ ~ E ~ 1 ~ ~fraC'.Ey~~ ~ ~ 1~ 4r E!l { ` ~ s ,-s'~.. vi+~'~ ~r~ T 1- s t~ur~n `x1,.."~~~Lh 1~)a ~ ~ F1 ir~~ " r~, n a" r ,:F' `F ~n f' r .Ei ° P,'[-~r-rri t[ t7 ,L~t ~ ~ ~ ~',h+E f sur i-aat r - : s^fk~ ~ ~ .'il ~~y-~~~ ant r~F+d~t'~ ' -rz ~ ~ , ! ~ as.,~l 1: ~ 1~ r ~ 3tli ii f~ 8r rC 1 "A ' ,,.,..~L: r ~~~i'ri, ~~fJr rxMt4 ~xu LS:~~r rri t'xFf~~-~xs'uW c~'" a. y~ t `~.ryk,`#~ i -r - ~v~ 7~;rn ~'?nh~r ¢u'Sa a ~u~ ~n~~~.~- T~~ vE~' n~ ~ Tt r A : ~I~ ~ ~y .~~'y ,~,1L 7~ ~ 5~ ~ 1 ( 4 ~ .41 rCA~.. s~ ii r Mu^~sF+~° lr ~x r~~>_~1h'.. ~~~T~Mt 7"r.E'i'~~ ~`n 1 1 f ~ I ~I ~ C >k r A ~T~~~ r? S ~ ~ R~~fry'~Xgs~r iS~N 7~d'C~.! rlr£I !1'1«T,7'G 4ur~~ f~iy yr t ' r . ~ >h 1 rAr~~a(,{~ 1 ~m}.~ L¢ $ k xr 4 try ~r~ k rl t t[~ Sk . 1. H.~'f£»~ L'- r41$Tr"~rU IM~VY~i~ FS ~ ~~h~~~P [(4,1/~J-I~TI II. ~.'1 .f~ ~~ff,~ 3~, I~ ~~"~`3`~"'~i'f~'` 4 F 3L~ rL `v ~Sw ~~qr>t ~~.~~7,"tea & 1 1: '4 r•id i a(t v~ a 1} z`sE3s z i 1 ~FM rt~~€ru7#ur a..+v w 4 £1 ~ ~ ~ s»r T.{ i ck~ig'~~~ ~wryr~n~' "iN°r,~ ~F x~1 1 r r,1.= ~ ~ ~ - N~ ~w1r~ Ei 1"'~~a~ 1~}~y s n pis v".`"4~•~ 7sx1 e I f r i g r 4 u iE { 1 r>'~~ i6.~Rh7xi ~ >~C8 ~i€ Ji> tl i I E~ ~,.r1f~ fe~'!a'ktl x 1~a !x'u ry~ S ~ m ~ ~ , if .x5 -~'~r'+ a~ f 37 ~ s - t~PuFfE 41~17~`"3r~ rt` ,K"~..-~ ~L~~~7.t'•-~i~ r .•y f ,5 n L f AnF xFrMi7la~a~ 1tt 7S'~~-~{{~« ~aryry1~1~r~s¢ a ^ fY~*ti3~ r Lrb'~~1 u~'`~a'r ~£W ~€~s~~5 !LF3 Qr~~N't €1tr ~ s ~ ) r : t .::.3,.~ ih € tr _ ~`!lllk cry aF~~r'~s. ~ ~•~~}[~~I~i~~ }~yi 1 ~~~?~Frnh, ~"c ~ ~ 7 F r^ wa a +E f"' n~ ~.'€hn'[ ~~t v ~ s~~" yr<.t" ' ~ ns" m ~'Er d,~ 1 hN' a~ ° E~"~. ai 11 [ v 1'~,~1 ti fl • o ` ;i ~ f1- - ~~14 r ! .C~ S ¢'Fb~~i c'a hf-'Iv~ n r'it . .Fkl, ~ry?~rltu t~ a4 r~~~~~ r~ 7FV rx ~ jrt i ~C1 ~~41~tA r'n~~~'t',F~~r?`'o ~ } ~v, ~e 4°E r rt~ ~ { t ~ 3, i S ~ E`~' Jry n;~r,rt~~~w '~~a`~ u~,~ 'r a' rr , _ .fi ~ 1 rt~'r~J~yn~vys lh 'fir r~mn ar7t^E, f'r h~~. 1 .f~3'i ~ L S'apJ Y ~~S rA L'tAml ~ ' ~k11Wu nN.r~ . k ~ xP I ~~L 7 ff~u~~r G( ~~3r` f 1 4t J1S f ~'1'I~t~P . h F~~ r*r ) ~1 £ t~ -t Y rR EM~u r~ ~ ~~ay, ~1 " "tni~ s n,- r A~ ~ r ~w t, $ ~ i ~r ~ - x ~ 1 ~rh ~ks~- ~ f'! 4 < , ! r h i t~ 4 . . I~ 'r• :t ~~a.1 1 .,i 0 5 ~0 2U ! Midas 1 ,~,~x,'L.~>~~~~:~~t;~~k~~>~t5~.~,~,ff~.~~,?~~~,~~~1; t, .r ~sr~~i~s~'.~ixr~ F~~URE ~anfiaAna Transit honing ~c~d . Regional Vicinity Map ' ' f -n i i „i ~ f ~ N a ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 r R ~s C s ' ~ ~ ~ t 'U ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ aka u ~ GJ ~ i y~ ~ ~ ~ i 1~ ~a fS l~ku'sa<4~ 4^'~ rt ~t~l E "i s <~„p~~~~S~Ni~n ~kY uir.g",u t '^r-^k' -8 ~t ~E^- ~'-~4'^-~""~ ,,.t,~.,a. «p ..,,R ~ k ~ j''J~"i F~^'KST' G~.a~~ .N~.h M~~~ i ~ E ant kt,><s~N~e~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ 7 ~ ~ ~~iar~ ~ ~ s T:. Nl.L t 1 ~ L )~T J ~ t Y ai i ~ is ~ i 1 ~ r~ rQ 'r. ~ r ~ ~+.F ~ R ~ ~4~ 'i ~ ~ k (:y rc. ~k - Q ~ r _ hu. p~~t,2d.~} I~ ~ l 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ h t ~n ~ s t i. , ~ SG 1 M p~aA roartl~ t? Y} ~ - ~ I: 3'~k Hui . p 1 1 r. M S~TiF ''w? ..i ~ti m ~ n ~ ~ i~,nr i ~ w1 r ;m. ~ K~} tt ' f d ~ g ~ i ~ ~ I s ~ e~ ~1 } ~ , i I t .v ~y ~ ,J~1 ?k r A ilk. ~4 ~ T ~ ~ a ~ 1~ 84 Xe;[ b ,r a r r - _ X 1, Kt ~ ~ ~ np ; p: i S l~f, ' s7 1 i f I Fµ an r ~ ik ~ ~ n' r; ~ r uQ ~anad ~ r . ~ i i, i 4~~k~, I rrv ..q .._I, - , ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r i. ~ j i .~a~s ~ M ~ Xsa.~N i~ ~ j r { i ~ '7. i I ' u z ~ 4 i i ~ ~ ~ , i 4J O CJ ; ~ t9r3 r ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ m ~ ` r - \J i .O V L N'~ 0 O t~ .~s~~M~ rr f-' C ' ~ ~ ' - ~ } ' ~ C d q C~tl ~ ~ ~ 'F ~ ~ ps Air ~ ~ ' ~ J J ~ ~ F~~ , } µ we{ ~ ~ y ~N s ~ T ~ a MFYfMF ~ a, m ~ ~ c LEGEND ~ x i K ~ ~ Station District Project area ~ = ~ , ~ ,w ~ ~ s k ~ i ,.mss c yg a 3 ~'+-y,' ~ sg ~ Y Lx4 ~ ~ ~FZgtT' ~ - n~ s ~ 3 ~ ~ ' is ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~k aac ~i'~, 3 :i ~ ,4t x`06 ; ~ R h ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ Maximum Elevation ~ ~ 15~ msl ~ - ~ ~ ~ fi~ ~ ~ - U ~.a' >a {per +""""t`'"'"~ '!k, ~ ~ ' ~ S µ i - ~ ~ 1, 1. ~Y 3 ~"~Www~k~ .,.fir ~ xxw~Stwl~4t~ ~ ~ rwrr. f ~ ' [ Y ~ - C4 .L...~ ~ p`'`~ x0 A 11111~1111rt~.lll~lt ~ ~1 t Kt~ - ^ ~R xJ, A ~ ~ ` - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . M r: ! _ ,F . 1 > o < < J ~ 1 G: y n M. ~ ~ a r t k y ~ t ~ ~ M ~ t. ~ I. .t ~i °tl' ~ Tr ~ t Maximum Elevation ` r ~e~ 1 ~5 msl n ti << r. ~ i `t ~ F 0 5110 1,000 - k 5ti t. F~ x ~~~C FIGURE Z,-3 Topographic Map ` + ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~ z. x ti. ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ - ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ µ k i ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ i ~ y ~ p. W ~ ~ ~ .mss r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y i~ _ rWF ~ LL». ~a ~ ~ " ~ u ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ` 4 ~J *~Fxi~t~ hS ~ M a. Y ~ ~ ~ ~ rWf1y ~ ~ ~~3nr A F ~.y 1 L Sr , V R ~ . ~ ~ d~~ - rc ~4c ~ .fr L ~ ti T, h ~~"iYFr rf. k r ry ] y ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ .x ..a ~ .w. axe ~ s° ~ t HAS: 4 _ ~ ~ ~r~' ~ i r~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 P' S IN ~ i1~ ~.v fly S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tt u ns. m unmmr~. i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ;A. cw' s. 5 ~ P _ ~4 . £ cam, i. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i a ~ ~ h 5 ~ ~ + ~ ~X ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ i f ~ ~ ~ ' , . ~ ~ F. Y' n......n.w.. ~ ~ ~ r+. m ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ k ~ w ~ yy i Y 4$ ~ j 7 .A ~ drl f u~4~ ! { C V/ ~ L1 y~ a~~ ~ ~ 1L ' J ~ + 47 ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x s ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LL ~ ' ~ Rte. w. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y 4 ~ w~, W{w ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ = Q ~ ~ ~ ~ u f r ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s h 11AA ~ 8A - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E HY 1' ? y d$ 14~ l - wYR t T~ a NIY U ~ Aa`$ r~3 ~ ~ - ' ~ s . cs. w'~r'#v i ~ " ` sw;~~ ~x a~ E a K ~ ~ ~ ix~ ~ yy p S'C~C T ~ I G ti y L: I L H r 1~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ t ; k h ~ l y ~ 'r ^a; s ; t ~ k ~ l Y 4 T~~''r ~ °s a ~ s s ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ w R'~ ~ 7 ry 1 u~ 1 k k , h . 4 y~ I A ~ S ~~1 v I L ~ ~ t 1 ~ 1~ . ~ I _ ~ ~ 1 x i to ' ~ z 1~ ~ 60~+~~ ~ [ L ~t ~ L S ~ y . ..1 t. ~ ~ ~ 't t ~ ~ ~ } t. T ~ y I b ~ ; 1 F ~ L ~ { cat Y ~Q ~1p ' s ryk ` ~j ._.y i~ ~t' ~ _ ~ lY H x ~~~x~ ~i ~ 1 _ ~ tlz Y ` ~ ~ ~ o e, a ~ _ s r f k~ rt~~N~~~ s ~ s i ~ e ~ A r ~ i w r Z Q ~ x « r. t ` t ~4 3 L 1 l I rcrc T; 4N S - ~ ~ Y .f~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ Atli I .4i M n '..y, ~ ~ . O NA S a~s~sd~C Y~~ ~ ~ _ ~a ~ R~ r~~ ~ ~~~n~F~~~ This section identifies the laws and regulations that govern the conservation and protection of cultural resources that must be considered during the decision-making process for projects that have the potential to affect cultural resources. 3.~ FE~ER~L 3.~[.1 Natio~a Historic Preservation ~cfi of 19~~ ~~b USC 470' Enacted in 1 X66, the National Historic Preservation Act tNHPA} declared a national policy of historic preservation and instituted a multifaceted program, administered by the Secretary of the Interior, to encourage the achievement of preservation goals at the federal, state, and local levels. The NHPA authorized the expansion and maintenance of the National Register of Historic Places NRHP), established the position of State Historic Preservation Cuff icer and provided for the designation of State Review Boards, set up a mechanism to certify local governments to carry out the purposes of the NHPA, assisted Native American tribes to preserve their cultural heritage, and created the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ~ACHP~. Section 1a6 of the NHPA states that federal agencies with direct ar indirect jurisdiction over federally funded, assisted, or licensed undertakings must take into account the effect of the undertaking an any historic property that is included in, or eligible far inclusion in, the NRHP and that the ACHP must be afforded an opportunity to comment, through a process outlined in the ACHP regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations, CFR Part goo, an such undertakings. No federal involvement is included in the Development Project; therefore, the Section 106 process is not applicable. 3.1.E National Register o~ Historic Peaces The NRHP was established by the NHPA of ~ 966 as "an authoritative guide to be used by federal, state, and local governments, private groups, and citizens to identify the Nation's cultural resources and to indicate what properties should be considered for protection from destruction or impairment" ~3 6 CFR 60.~~,~ The N RH P recagn izes properties that are significant at the national, state, and local levels. Ta be eligible for listing in the NRHP, a resource must. be significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture. Districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of potential significance must also possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. A property is eligible for the NRHP if it is significant under one or more of the fol lowing criteria: Criterion A: It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. Criterion B: It is associated with the lives of persons who are significant in our past, ' Clnited States Code, 16 USC 4a0. ~ Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR 60.2. Station District Rraject 1-listarical assessment flay 6, .2011 Sappl~os Fnviranmental, Inc. l~I.IPRDJfC~S1147111~71-a47lDocumentsll~fistoricalAssessment~Final~.3 ~~ti~~~t~latary Framework.Doc Page 3-1 Criterion C: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represents the work of a master; possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. Criterion d; It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history X36 CFR 60.4.3 Cemeteries, birthplaces, graves of historic figures, properties awned by religious institutions ar used for religious purposes, structures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings, and properties that are primarily commemorative in nature are not considered eligible for the NRHP unless they satisfy certain conditions. in general, a resource must be at least 50 years of age to be considered for the NRHP, unless it satisfies a standard of exceptional importance. Two properties within the Station District area, Ebell Society of Santa Ana Valley X625 North French street} and L1.S. Post office Spurgeon office ~6~1 North hush Street7, are listed in the NRHP. None of the 23 properties that are the sub}ect of this Historical Assessment are listed in or have been formally determined eligible far listing in the NRHP. 3.1.3 Secretary of the Interior's Standards far the Treatment of Historic Properties Evolving from the Secretary of the Ir~teriorrs Standards far Historic Preservation Projects ~vitl~ Guidelines for Applying the Standards that were developed in ~ 976, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for tl~e Treatment of Historic Properties ~vitl~ C~ridelines far Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Recanstrc~ctirrg Historic $uildir~gs was published in 1995 and codified as 36 CFR 67. Neither technical nor prescriptive, these standards are "intended to promote responsible preservation practices that help protect our Nation's irreplaceable cultural resources."~ Preservation acknowledges a resource as a document of its history over time and emphasizes stabilization, maintenance, and repair of existing historic fabric. Rehabilitation not only incorporates the retention of features that convey historic character but also accommodates alterations and additions to facilitate continuing or new uses. Restaratian involves the retention and replacement of features from a specific period of significance Recanstructian, the least used treatment, provides a basis far re-creating a missing resource. These standards have been adopted, or are used informally, by many. 3.2 STATE 3.2.1 California Environmental Quality Acts Pursuant to the California Environmental C~uality Act ~CEQA~, a historical resource is a resource listed in, or eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources ~CRHR~. In addition, resources included in a local register of historical resources or identified as significant in a local survey conducted in accordance with state guidelines also are considered historical resources under CEQA, unless a preponderance of evidence demonstrates otherwise. According to CEQA, 3 Code of 1=ederal Regulations, 3b ciwl~ OD.4. ~ Weeks, Kay D., and Anne E. Grimmer. 1995. The .Secretary of the Interior`s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reeonstructing Historic buildings. Washington, DCe U.S. Department of the interior, National Park Service. ~ California P~1bliC Resources Code, Division Thirteen, statutes 21083,2, 21084.1. Station District P~oje=~:~~ Historical ~Is.~fessment day ~Ol 1 Sapphos ~nvirar~me~n~'~a~', [nc. t~l; lt'R~J~C7~SI I47~ I'; ~ t..007IDacumentslNistarica! ~ssessmentli=ir~all3 Regulatory Frame~orlC.Doc ,P,~f~e '3-.2 the fact that a resource is not listed in or determined eligible for listing in the CRHR ar is not included in a local register or survey shall not preclude a Lead Agency, as defined by CEQA, from determining that the resource may be a historical resource as defined in California Public Resources Code ~PRC} Section 502~.~ Pursuant to CEQA, a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource may have a significant effect on the environment.' 3.2.2 California Register of Histarieai Resaurces Created in 199 and implemented in 1 X98, CRHR is "an authoritative guide in California to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state's historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change."~ Certain properties, including those listed in or formally determined eligible for listing in the NRHP and California Historical Landmarks numbered 770 and higher, are automatically included in the CRHR, ether properties recognized under the California Points of Historical Interest program, identified as significant in historical resources surveys or designated by local landmarks programs, may be nominated far inclusion in the CRHR. A resource, either an individual property or a contributor to a historic district, may be listed in the CRHR if the state Historical Resources Commission determines that it meets one ar mare of the fallowing criteria, which are modeled on I~RHP criteria: Criterion 1; It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. Criterion 2: It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. Criterion 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction; represents the work of an important creative individual; or possesses high artistic values. Criterion 4: It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Resources nominated to the CRHR must retain enough of their historic character ar appearance to be recognizable as histarical resources and to convey the reasons far their significance.1° It is passible that a resource whose integrity does not satisfy NRHP criteria still may be eligible far listing in the CRHR. Similarly, resources that have achieved significance within the past 50 years may be eligible far inclusion in the CRHR if enough time has lapsed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource." 6 California Code of Regulations. Title 14, Chapter 3. CEQR Guidelines, Section 15~G4.5~a~. California Code of Regulations. Title 14, chapter 3. CEQA Guidelines, Section 15ob4.5~b). a California Public Resources Cade. Section 5~~4.1(a}. g California Public Resaurces Code, Section 5a~4.1(c}. 1° office of Historic Preservation. n,d. "Technical Assistance Bulletin 6: California Register and National Register, A Comparison for Purposes of Determining Eligibility for the California Register." Available at: http:]/www.ahp.parl~s.ca.gav " office of Historic Preservation. n.d. "Technical Assistance Bulletin 6: California Register and National Register, R Comparison for Purposes of Determining Eligibility for the Califo~•nia Registers" Available at: http:llwww.ahp.parks.ca.gov Station District Project Historical Assessment May 6, 2a 11 Sapphas Environmental, inc. ~/:IPR~j~CT~SI 147141471-D07tDocuments~Histarical A~:~e~~` n~`li"inal~3 Regulatory Framewark.Dac Page 3-3 Two properties within the Station District area, Ebell Society of Santa Ana galley X625 North French Streets and U,S. Past dffice, Spurgeon ~ffiee X601 North Bush Street, are listed in the CRHR. None of the 23 properties that are the subject of this Historical Assessment are listed in or have been formally determined eligible for listing in the CRHR. A survey conducted in ~Oa6'~ assigned a 3CD'3 status code to 3 of the ~3 properties X649 East Sixth Street, 613 East Sixth Street, and 617 East Sixth Streets and a ~CS'~ status Cade to a property located at 615617 East Fifth Street. 8.2.3 ~alifrornia Historical l.andn~arks'~ California Historical Landmarks are buildings, structures, sites, or places that have anthropological, cultural, military, political, architectural, economic, scientific or technical, religious, experimental, or other value and that have been determined to have statewide historical significance by meeting at least one of the criteria listed below. The resource must also be approved for designation by the County Board of Supervisors or be recommended by the state Historical Resources Commission and be officially designated by the Director of California state Parks. The specific standards now in use were first applied in the designation of CH L 770. CN Ls 77D and above are automatical (y l fisted in the CRHR. To be eligible for designation as a Landmark, a resource must meet at least one of the following criteria: ~ Be the first, last, on f y, or most significant of its type in the state or with i n a large geographic region Northern, Central, or Southern California? Be associated with an individual or group having a profound influence on the history of California ~ Be a prototype of, or an outstanding example of, a period, style, architectural movement, or construction, or be one of the more notable works or the best surviving work in a region of a pioneer architect, designer, or master builder The Station District area does not include any California Historical Landmarks. 3.x.4 California Points of Historical lnterest'~ California Paints of Historical Interest are sites, buildings, features, or events that are of local city or county? significance and have anthropological, cultural, military, political, architectural, economic, scientific or technical, religious, experimental, or other value. Points of Historical Jones & stakes. November Z~06. draft Historical .Resources Evaluation. loos Angeles, CA, Prepared for: City of Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency. ~3 The 3CD status code denotes properties that appear eligible far the CRHR as a contributor to aCRHR-eligible district through survey evaluation. The 3CS status code denotes properties that appear eligible for the CRHR as an individual property through survey evaluation. office of Historic Preservation. Accessed 2 February X011. "California Histarica! Landmarks." Available at: http:llohp.parks.ca.gov Office of I~listoric Preservation. Accessed 2 February ~a11. "California Points of Historical interest." Available at: http:l'ahp.p,~rks.ca.gov St~~tic~~ ~~istrict Project ~~-~istorical Assessment M;~y 1 Sap~~"w~-s Environmental, ln~, lN. ~~''.~~;°~~~j~. C;TS114711 ]471-~07LDoeumentslHistorical Assessment4Er"na113 Regulatory Eramew©rk,~.~~~~Y ~ Page ~-4 Interest designated after December 1997 and recommended by the State Historical Resources Commission also are listed in the CRHR. No histarica{ resource may be designated as both a Landmark and a Point, If a Point is subsequently granted status as a Landmark, the Point designation will be retired. Ta be eligible far designation as a Paint of Historical Interest, a resource must meet at least one of the following criteria: ~e the first, last, only, ar mast significant of its type within the lava) geographic region city ar county} Be associated with an individual or group having a profound influence on the history of the local area Be a prototype of, ar an outstanding example of, a period, style, architectural movement, ar construction, or be one of the more notable works ar the best surviving work in the local region of a pioneer architect, designer, or master builder The Station District area does not include any California Paints of Historical Interest. 3.3 CITY CAF SANTA ~4NA 3.3.1 Santa Ana General Plan Several elerr~ents of the Genera{ Plan reference cultural resources, including historic resources: ® Conservation Element' ~ Housing E{ement'8 ® Land Use ~lement'~ $ Urban Design Element2° The Conservation dement is concerned with the protection, utilization, and development of natural and cultura{ resources Cane goal, two objectives, and two policies address cultural resources. Goal 2 of this dement is to preserve, maintain, and properly use natural and cultura! resources. objective 2.~ is to integrate natural and cultural resource protection measures into land use and development activities. Objective ~.1 is to minimize loss of natural aesthetic, historic, archeological, and paleontological resources as land is developed, City of Santa Ana ~City~ policies include the encouragement of private-nectar participation in natural and cultural resource protection activities and maximization of the City's aesthetic and visua{ appeal by increasing vegetation throughout the community and by enhancing architectural, historic, and other visual resources. In support of these goals and objectives, three programs are enumerated: Inventory existing historic, archeological, paleontological, and cultura{ sites and districts "City of Santa Ana Planning Division..~0 September 1952. City of Santa Ana Genera! Plan Conservation dement 1982, City of Santa Ana Planning Division. 19 October 2009. City of Santa Ana Genera! Plan dousing dement 20aG-2014. City of Santa Ana Planning Division. Z February 1998. City of Santa Ana Genera( Plan Land Use Element 199$. City of Santa Ana Planning Division. ~ J~l~f 1998. City of Santa Ana General Plan Urban Design Element 1998, 5'tatron Drstrrct Project Historical Assessment ~ ~ ~ ~1ay 6, 2011 Sapphas Enviror~rnental, fnc. V'~I:IPf~QJ~C~Si147111471-a47i[~acc~r~er~~~r ~~z~-'~r~call~ssesst~ent~Finali3 Regr~latory Frarnework.~ac Page 3-.~ Require preservation of natural and cultural resources as a condition of building permit approvals ® Develop incentives in the zoning code to encourage protection and enhancement of natural, cultural, and historic resources The Housing Element of the City's Genera[ Plan discusses the City's vision and plan to encourage an array of housing opportunities to accommodate current and future hauling needs. cane goal and one policy were identified in relation to cultural resources. Goal 1 is to promote livable neighborhoods through quality housing conditions, quality parks and community services, and well-maintained infrastructure that inspire neighborhood pride, In support of this goal, Pa[icy HE-1.7, Historic Preservation, supports the preservation and enhancement of residential structures, properties, street designs, lot configurations, and other visible reminders of Santa Ana's neighborhoods that are considered local historic or cultural resources. This element describes programs that promote historic preservation: the City's historic program and ordinance, historic home rehabilitation incentive and Mills Act program, historic neighborhood preservation opportunities, and expanded adaptive reuse program. The .and Use Element presents a general description of the City's cultural resources and specifies two goals specifically applicable to historic resources. Goa! 3 of this Element is to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. Goal 4 is to protect and enhance community assets and is supported by Policy 4.Z, calling for retention and reuse of historical buildings and sites, The lJrban Design Element of the City's General Plan establishes the City's vision for its urban form and seeks to implement a safe and aesthetically pleasing environment for its residents. Two goals and several policies relate to cultural resources: Goal ~ Improve the physical appearance of the City through the development that i~ proportionally and aesthetically related to its district setting Policy Z.3 Preservation involving the adaptive reuse of historic and architecturally significant structures, is encouraged Citywide. Policy New projects must respect the architectural style, scale, context, and rhythm of Santa Ana's historic buildings and districts. Policy ~.5 The use of artistic interpretation will be encouraged as a means to preserve the City's heritage and enhance its regional presence in the downtown historic district. Policy ~.8 The character and uniqueness of existing districts and neighborhoods are to be protected from intrusive development. Policy x.11 New developments must re-enforce or help establish district character. Goal ~ Create new and protect existing City landmarks and memorable places that Canvey positive images 5tatior~ District Project Nistorica! Assessmer~r May 6, ~~i 1 ~ Sapphos ~nviror~mentalA lnc, W:IPRC~~~C7~SI14711~471-DD71Docur~entslHist~rical~ssessmer~tlFina~l3 Regul~:~~~~~~~~~; ~;=ra~ewark:Dac Page 3-6 Policy 6.2 Development near an existing landmark must be supportive and respectful of the architecture, site, and other design features of the landmark. 3.3.E Santa Ana Register ®f Historical Pr®perties The Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties ~SARHP~ was established under Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana h~unicipal Code, overseen by the Historic Resources Commission, the SARHP may include "any building or part thereof, object, structure, or site having importance to the history ar architecture of the city."~~ To be eligible far designation, a property must be 50 years old and satisfy at least one of six criteria: 1, Buildings, structures, ar objects with distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period that exemplify a particular architectural style or design features Works of notable architects, builders, or designers whose style influenced architectural development 3. Rare buildings, structures, or objects or original designs 4. Buildings, structures, objects or sites of historical significance that include places: a. Where important events occurred b. Associated with famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations and businesses c. Which were originally present when the city was founded d. That served as important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity 5. Sites of archaeological importance 6. Buildings or structures that were connected with a business or use that was once common but is now rare Properties placed an the SARHP are categorized atone of three levels of significance: Landmark category; a~ The building, structure, object ar site is on the National Register or appears to be eligible to be placed an the register b. The building, structure, object ar site is on the State Register or appears to be eligible to be placed on the register c. The building, structure, abject or site has histariclcultural significance to the City d. The building, structure, abject ar site has a unique architectural significance Bey category: a. The building, structure, object or site has a distinctive architectural style and quality b. The building, structure, abject ar site is characteristic of a significant period in the history of the City city of Sang Ana, California, Code of C~rdinances~ Chapter 3Q, Places of Historical and Architectural Significance, Section 3Q, Station District Project ~ Nistorr"cal assessr~~r May 6, 2011 ~ Sapphas ~rtviror~mental, Etc.. W.lP~oJFCTSl1471L147]-~"~~~°"r~~:a~~cuments4NistaricalAssessment~~inalL3 Regu~ator~ ~ramewark.Dac Page c. The building, structure, abject ar site is associated with a significant person or event in the City Contributive category; The building, structure, abject ar site contributes to the overall character and history of a neighborhood ar district and is a good example of period architecture. Section 3a.4 of the City of Santa .Ana Municipal Code empowers the City Council to designate historic districts on the recommendation of the ~~listoric Resources Commission. A local historic district must meet one ar mare of four standards: a. The area constitutes a distinct section of the city and has special character, historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest and value. b. The area provides significant examples of architectural values of the past or landmarks in the history of architecture. c. The area serves as a reminder of past eras, events, ar persons important in the history of the city, the county, the state ar the United States of America ar illustrates past living styles for future generations to observe, study, ar inhabit. d. The area is the site of a historically ar culturally significant ground, garden, ar object. There are four buildings located within the Station District that are listed on the SARHP. Of these four buildings, only the Whitson-Powelson House is Agency~owned: ~ Whitson-Powelson House, 5D1 East Fifth Street, categorized as ICey Agency-owned U.S. Past Office, Spurgeon Office, ~D1 North Bush Street, categorized as Landmark Ebell Society of Santa Ana, X25 Forth French Street, categorized as Landmark ~ Thomas House, North Spurgeon Street, categorized as fey There are no designated historic districts listed in fihe SARHP in the Station District. Station District Project ~ Historical Assessment May ,ZO ~ 1 Sapphos environmental, inc. VU: IPRO~~c~TSt ~ 4711147 ~-U~71DacumentslHistorical Assessmen Iii'°` $~:~a :~egulatary Framewarko-Doc ~ Page 3-8 Fcr~~v ~,o ~r~~~ This section of the Historical Assessment describes the methods employed in the characterization and evaluation of historical resources within the Station District area. The study methods were designed to provide the substantial evidence required to address the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA~ Guidelines' and are consistent with professional standards ref ated to historical resources; ~ Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning ~ National Register Bulletin No. 15; "How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation"~ ~ National Register Bulletin No. 24; "Guidelines for focal Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning"4 ~ State of California Office of Historic Preservation: Instructions for Recording Historical Resaurces~ The methodology undertaken to identify and evaluate historical resources was designed to accomplish three goals: ~ Identification of previously known, recorded, andlor designated resources Identification of potentially significant resources ~ Evaluation of the significance of properties using established criteria within the framework of a historic context, in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Evaluation 4.1 ARCHIVAL RESEARCH ANI~ LITERATURE RE11IE'IM The background investigations included records searches and literature reviews to determine ~a} if known historical resources have previously been recorded in the Station District area andlor within the larger Transit Zoning Code 4SD 84A and SD 84B} area, ~b~ if the project site has been systematically surveyed by historians prior to the initiation of the Historical Assessment, andlor ~c~ whether there is other information that would indicate whether the area is historically sensitive. A literature review was undertaken to determine if the proposed project would have the potential to adversely affect known historical resources. Published and unpublished literature was reviewed. ~ California Code of Regulatiar~s. Title 1~, Division Chapter 3, Section 15a0Q--15387, Appendix G. ~ U.S. department of the Interior, National Parry Service. Accessed ~ February 2011. Tl~e Secretary of the Interior`s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines far Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. Washington, DC. Available at: http:llwww.nps.govlhpsltpslstandguidef 3 U.S. Department of the Interior, National Parr Service. Accessed 2 February Zo11. National Register Bulletin 75. Now to Apply the Natr'onal Regr"ster Criteria for Fvaluatior~. Washington, DC. Available at: http:llwww.nps.govlnrlpublicationslbulletinslnrb151 ~ U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Accessed 18 August 200. National Register Bulletin 24. Guidelines for focal Surveys, A Basis for Preservation Planning. Washington, DC. Available at: http:llwww.cr,nps.govlnrlpublicationslbulletinslnrb24lchapterl.htm ~ Uffice of Historic Preservation, March 1995. Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Sacramento, CA. Available at: http:llo~~p.parks.ca.gov Station Dis~:ric~::iT~aject Nisi:oriral Assessment May 6, 2011 ~ Sapphos ~l~vir.~r~rnerrtal,lnc. . vV: IPRQ)~C ~S~ ~i I'r 1471-aQ~IDocurnentsLNistorical Assessment[Finall4 Methods. Doc ~ ~ ~ Page ~-1 A historical resources records search for the proposed project site and surrounding area was conducted in November 201 o by a Sapphos Environmental, Inc. architectural historian. This search included a review of all known relevant historical resources surveys and examinations of the Mate of California Historica! Resources Inventory ~HRI} for grange County,6 which includes listings in the National Register of Historic Places ~NRHP},' California Register of Historical Resources ~CRHR}, California Historic Landmarks ~CHL~,~ and California Points of Historical Interest ~CPHI~.~ The City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties was also reviewed.'° Additional research was conducted in public records and a number of repositories, including building permits at the City of Santa Ana as available; the California History Index of the Los Angeles Public Library; the Avery Index of Architectural Periodicals; the Santa Ana History Roor~ Collection of the Santa Ana Public Library; aerial photographs; parcel and coning maps; Sanborn fire insurance maps; general histories; historic images; historic newspapers and periodicals indexed by the ProQuest Newspaper Database; ephemera; historical resources survey reports; relevant ordinances; technical materials relating to federal, state, and local historic preservation; and other materials, as available or appropriate. 4.2 PEDESTRIAN SURVEY An intensive~level survey of the 23 buildings in the Station District was conducted in October through November 201o to identify any buildings, structures, objects, or districts that meet the CEC~A definition of a historical resource. The buildings, both exteriors and interiors, and their settings were inspected and photographed. Character-defining features were identified in accordance with Preservation Brief Na. 17: Architectural Character: Identifying the Visual Aspects of Nistaric Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character" and Preservation Brief lala. 1$: ~4ehahilitating interiors in ~'istoric Buildings: Identifying and Preserving Character-Defining Flements.'~ This information was recorded on State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Historic Resources Inventory forms ~DPR 523 series Appendix B, California hfistaric Pesaurces Inventory DPP 523 Forms. Some properties had been documented on previously completed DPR 523 forms; these farms were reviewed and updated accordingly. ~ California Department of Parks and Recreation, office of Historic Preservation. 1~ April 2009. grange County Historic Property Data File. Sacramento, CA. 'California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation. 2x09. Natrona! Pegister of Historic Places. Fullerton, CA: California State University, Fullerton, Department of Anthropology, South Central Coastal lnfarmation Center. ~ California Department of Parks and Recreation, office of Historic Preservation. 20D9. California Historic Landmarks. Fullerton, CA: California state University, Fullerton, Department of Anthropology, south Central Coastal Information Center. ~ California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation..~OD9. California Points of Historical interest. Fullerton, CA: California State University, Fullerton, Department of Anthropology, South Central Coastal Information Center. 1° City of Santa Ana, California. Updated 1 Z Qctober 2DD9. Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, Available at: http:llwww.ci.santa-ana.ca.uslpbalplanning/documentslH isfiaric_Register.pdf " Nelson, Lee H. September 1958. Preservation Brief No. 17: Architectural Character: identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services. Available at: www.cr.nps.govlhpsltpslbriefslbriefl7.htm Jandl, H. Ward. ~ctaber 1988. Preservation Brief No. iB: Rehabilitating interiors in Nr'storic Buildings: identifying and Preserving CharacterWDefining Elements. Washington, DC: l~.s. Department of the Interior, National Park service, Technical Preservation Services. Available at: www.cr.nps.govlhpsltpslbriefslbriefl8.htm Station District Project , Historical Assessment May 6, Zp 71 Sapphos Environmental, inc. 1N:1PRaJECTSl14711i471-OD~IDoc~mentslHistori~~~~}' a~„~ssrnentll~ina1141~iethads.Doc Page 4-~ A windshield survey of the Lacy neighborhood, as defined in a previous historical resources study, with the exception of the portion located in the French Park District, was conducted on December 30, 2010. The boundaries of this neighborhood are Civic Center Drive on the north, Poinsettia Street on the east, Fourth Street on the south, and Spurgeon and French Streets on the west. The purpose of the windshield survey was to determine the potential for a historic district in the neighborhood. 403 EVALUATION 4.3.E Use of Criteria of Significance Resources were evaluated using the criteria of significance for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, and SARHP Section 3, ~eg~~ator}r ~rame~vork~. The NRHP and CRHR criteria mirror each other. The SARHP criteria are mostly complementary. SARHP Criteria 1, 2, and 3 spe[I out architectural significance somewhat more specifically than NRHPICRHR Criterion C13. Similarly, SARHP Criteria ~ a through d and ~ address historical association and linkage with important persons in a manner mare relevant to Santa Ana than NRHP/CRHR Criteria All and BIZ, NRHPICRHR Criterion Dl4 and SARHP Criterion 5 are directed toward the evaluation of archaeological properties and were not utilized in this Historical Assessment. It is possible that, given the variation in criteria, properties found eligible for the SARHP ar even the CRHR may not be eligible for the NRHP. Primarily, this difference in conclusions is due to the Santa Ana practice of categorization, as Landmark, Key, ar Contributive, which has enabled the City of Santa Ana to create tiers of significance. As a general rule, all properties categorized as Landmark and most properties categorized as Key will be eligible for the NRHP and CRHR. Properties categorized as Contributive would be eligible for the NRHP or CRHR in many cases only if they are contributors to a potential historic district. The question of required levels of integrity also differentiates the three types of designation. 4.3.2 Required Levels of Integrity Na~ivrra~ Regls~er of His~orrc Paces The NRHP defines ir~tegrit}~ as the ability of a property to convey its significance.' There are seven aspects to i ntegrity: ~ Location is the place where the historic property was constructed ar the place where the historic event occurred, ~ Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. ~ Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. ~ Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern ar configuration to form a historic property. ~ workmanship is the physica[ evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. 13 U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Accessed ~ February .2~~ 1. ~iatianal Register Bulletr'n 15; How tc~ Ap~~~ly the Natiar~a~ Register Criteria for evaluation, pp. 44~-49d Washington, Dc. Available at: ~~~~:~p:11~~vww.nps.gavlnrlpubl icationslbul letinslnrb15 :~°r e':~:tio~ District Project Nr`storical ,4ssessment ;9~:,;~y Za 11 .~aaphas nviranmer~tal, lrrc. .`;';'~'~~.~JCTSI1471I1~7?-QD7lDacumentslHistoricaf Assessmer~tlFinall4 ~ethads.Dac ~:a~ Page ~-3 ~ Feeling is a property`s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time. ~ ~?ssociation is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. To be eligible for listing in the NRHP, a property will satisfy mast, if not all, aspects of integrity. In same cases, depending on the nature of the significance ~i.e., which criterion of significance is being dernanstrated~, one or more aspects of integrity may be less critical. Far example, a property that is significant for architectural merit would usually require integrity of design, materials, and workmanship, and, most likely, feeling. The test far integrity for architecturally significant properties is retention of thaw physical features that characterize the type, period, method of construction, or architect that the property represents ~i.e., the "character~defining features"7. Similarly, a property significant far historic association may have a lower degree of integrity of design or workmanship. However, it is important to note that properties significant for historic association should represent their period of significance when the important event occurred or person was associated; the test is whether a historical contemporary would recognize the property as it exists today. ~ali~orr~la Register of Nrs~or~c~a1 resources lntegrity is defined by the CRHR as the authenticity of a historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. To be eligible for the CRHR, a resource must retain enough of its historic character or appearance to be recognizable as a historical resource and to convey the reason for its significance. Rehabilitated or restored resources are eligible, as are resources whose alterations may have gained significance in their awn right. As with the NRHP, CRHR integrity is evaluated with respect to location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. The relative importance of each of these aspects depends an which criterion of significance is being employed. It is possible that historical resources may not retain sufficient integrity far NRHP eligibility but may still be eligible for the CRHR, if it rnaintains the potential to yield significant scientific or historical information or data.'4 Sar~~a A~aa Regisifer of h(is~orlcal groper#ies The question of integrity of potential SARHP candidates is not specifically discussed in Chapter ~a of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, although Section 30-~.3 does note that loss of integrity is a valid reason to remove a property from the SARHP. In practice, individual listings in the SARHP do possess a relatively high level of exterior integrity, as seen from the public right~of-way, Far example, if more than 5a percent of exterior materials must be replaced, the building would not be eligible unless the property also meets other criteria, such as association with a significant person ar event. Such exceptions have occurred when a property was located in the Downtown Historic District or when historic importance or association under Criteria 3, 4, or 6 weighed heavily in the evaluation. Certain types of alterations automatically eliminate a property frorr~ further consideration of eligibility, such as an inappropriate stucco finish or texture ar modification of windows or window sizes. For the current evaluation, a residence whose original exterior materials and architectural detailing have been altered, windows changed, andlor porch enclosed or modified would not be considered eligible for the SARHP, Merely dating to a historic period in Santa Ana history has not been considered sufficient to warrant nomination to the SARHP. California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 4~~Z Ica. .Station District Pralect Historical Assessment May b, 2011 Sapphas Environmental, lnc. W;IPRaJECTSI ~471I1471-a~7lDocumer~tslHistoric,~1~~~~ssessment~Finall4 Methads.Dac Page 4-4 4,4 ~ER~~NI~EL Sapphos Environmental, Inc. culture! resources managerlarchitectural historian Ms. Lesiie Heun~ann supervised the work effort and reviewed the report and supporting dacuments. Ms, 1~arlise Fratinarda, senior culture! resources coordinatorlarchitecturs! historian, conducted background research and report writing tasks. Nis. Heun~ann, ~4s. Fratinarda, and Nis. Caries meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professions! Qualifications Standards far Architectural History Appendix A, Resurr~~s of Key Personnel}. station District Project Historical Assessment ~viay 6, ZD 11 Sapphos ~nvironmenta~, Inc. ~~~:If f~Q)FCTSI 171 11471-~d7lDocumentsli~istarical Assessmentll~rna114 ~lethads.Doc Page 4-5' SF~TI~~I V A I~~SULT~~ This section of the Historical Assessment presents the results of the historical resources investigations of ~3 properties located within the Station District area. The discussion comprises a historical context that provides background information an the wider Lacy neighborhood area and an overall framework for the evaluation of the 23 properties; a resource characterization that describes previously conducted historical surveys and studies in which historical resources have been identified in the Station District area; a general discussion of historic integrity; an assessment of each of the 2~ Agency-owned properties that evaluates each property under Nfational Register of Historic Places ~NRHP}, California Register of Historical Resources ~CRHR}, and the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties ~SARHP} designation criteria; and a historic district assessment of the Station District area. 5.1 HISTORIC OVERVIEW; DEVELOPMENT OF THE LACY I~EI~H~ORHOOa,1095-1930 Santa Ana was founded by 11Villiam Spurgeon in 1889 as a speculative town site on part of the Spanish land grant known as Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. The civic and commercial core of the community was centered on the intersection of Fourth and Main Streets. Stimulated by the arrival of the Santa Fe Railroad, incorporation as a city in 188, and selection as the seat of the newly created County of Grange in 1889, the city grew outwards, with residential neighborhoods developing around the city center. Agricultural uses predominated in the outlying areas, with cultivated fields and orchards dotted with widely scattered farmhouses. One of the oldest neighborhoods in Santa Ana, the Lacy neighborhood is home to a variety of properly types, including residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial, that represent over 1~o years of Santa Ana's history. The Lacy neighborhood is defined by the City of Santa Ana as bordered an the north by Civic Center Drive, on the east by Poinsettia Street, an the south by First Street, and an the west by Main Street. From Civic Center Drive on the north to roughly Fourth Street on the south, the Lacy neighborhood intersects with the Station District area,' In the final quarter of the nineteenth century, Lacy's residential subdivision and settlement was fueled by the .downtown business district, located bath in and adjacent to the neighborhood. By the end of the 188os, this business district encompassed five city blocks, consisting primarily of one- to two-story brick commercial buildings. In the same period, Lacy's eastern portion had also become the nexus of the Southern Pacific Railway line, brought to Santa Ana in 1878; and the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway line, established in 1888. The Lacy neighborhood was in proximity to local street car and railway connections, with the Santa Ana and Tustin Street Railway running along First Street; the Santa Ana and ~tlestrr~inster Railroad an Second Street, with a terminus point just east of Main Street; the Pacific Electric Railway line on Fourth Street; and the Santa Ana, Orange, and Tustin Street Railway line connecting the 1878 Southern Pacific Depot with downtown Santa Ana, via Santa Ana Boulevard formerly Fruit Street. Triggered by this proximity to commerce and transportation, residential development arrived early in Lacy, with numerous residential tracts offering small lots in the 1880s. In .1888, a subdivision dubbed "Santa Ana Fast" was advertised "on the line of the Los Angeles and San Diego railroad." ' City of Santa Ana, California. Accessed Z February ~Q1 "lacy Neighborhood Map" Available at: http:llwww,ci,santa- ana,ca.uslcdaldocumentslLacyMap~.pdf Station District Project Historical Assessment May 6, 11 Sapphos environmental, lnc. VU:IPR~JCTS114711 i4T 1-007~Doc~~~rn~:~-~~~ !~~istarica~ Assessmentlfinall5 ~esults.Doc gage 5-1 The current 45-degree angle of Santa Ana Boulevard and Civic Center Drive reflects the layout of this tract, which consisted of 5a-foot-wide lots oriented to the Southern Pacific's diagonal swath. In addition to encouraging residential settlement, the Lacy neighborhood's proximity to the railroads brought numerous industrial concerns to east Santa Ana, including lumber yards, foal-packing and canning plants, furniture warehouses, and other manufacturing plants. Two early tracts are located in the vicinity of the Station District area, The "Fruit Addition" and "James H. Fruit Addition to Santa Ana East" are associated with increased residential development in the vicinity of the new railways that reached Santa Ana during the late 18oDs, providing vital connectivity to the City. Due in part to their proximity to the railroad and the downtown business district, centered at Fourth and fain Streets, the buildings in these tracts represented a mix of residential and industrial uses. The earliest buildings were typically modest vernacular cottages that housed Santa Ana's working-class residents ~e.g., building contractors, dry goads salesmen, carpenters, clerks, and milliners at the turn of the twentieth century. By 1900, the basic structure of the central core of Santa Ana, including the Lacy neighborhood, was well established and largely as one sees it today ~~011}, with a cluster of commercial buildings at Fourth and Gain Streets, residential areas radiating outward, and a network of interconnecting railway lines, flanked by a variety of industrial and manufacturing buildings, defining the eastern sector of the Lacy neighborhaad. The Lacy neighborhood continued to expand during the pre-World war 1 period, with an increase in residential development accompanied by the construction of many cultural, civic, and religious buildings, clustered in the neighborhood's northwestern portion. A historical map from 1906 depicts a neighborhaad comprising primarily single-family dwellings intermingled with occasional undeveloped lots. The 192~s brought a new focus to the neighborhood when a large number of auto sales and repair shops were established in Lacy's southwestern area, By 1927, at least 12 auto sales and repair shops were clustered between Third and Fourth Streets, and French and Lacy Streets. By the 193os, the neighborhaad was fully developed as a residential community comprising single-family and multi-family properties interspersed with neighborhood services and commercial uses that included agricultural supply businesses. In the post-World War II era, the construction of large multifamily dwellings began to alter the character of the area toward higher-density residential uses. In eastern Lacy, recent redevelopment projects have begun to change the area's formerly industrial character and have brought a new wave of settlement to the neighborhood. The Lacy neighborhood is in proximity to numerous historic properties with local, state, and federal designation, including the City of Santa Ana's two NRHP Districts: Downtown Santa Ana and French Park. The City of Santa Ana's original downtown business district was listed in the NRHP as the Downtown Santa Ana Historic District in 1984. The district is roughly bounded by Civic Center on the earth, Spurgeon Street on the east, First Street an the south, and Ross Street on the west. Reflecting a wide diversity of property types, contributors to the NRHP-listed district include the U.S. Post Office X601 North Bush Street, also individually listed in the NRHP and CRHR and as a landmark in the SARHP}, Episcopal Church of the Messiah ~~14 North Bush Street, also listed in the SARHP in the "Landmark" categary~; the Shaffer-Wakeman Building ~1o8--11~ East Fourth Street, listed in the SARHP in the "Key" category}; the Brunner Building ~ Old City )ail X116 East Fourth Street, listed in the SARHP in the "Contributive" category); and the Odd Fellows Hall X309 North Main Street, also individually listed in the CRHR/NRHP and as a landmark in the ~ Sanborn Map Compar~y~ 18881189511946119.25 l 1949. Insurance 1Nap~° of Santa Anna, California. Colorado Springs, CO. Station E~istrict Project Historical Assessment May 6, Za1 I Sa~~hos Environmental, inc. W:IPROJEC~51147111411-~a71E7ocr~mentsl~listorical AssessmentlFinall5 ~'es€.d l~ p. I?~c Page 5-2 SARHP}. Other designated landmarks include Old Santa Ana City Hall ~Z17 North Main Street, bath individually ! fisted i n the CRH RlN RH P and as a contributor to the Downtown Santa Ana Historic District}; the Ebel) Society of Santa Ana Valley ~b~5 North French Street, individually listed in NRHPICRHRand as a landmark in the SARHP}, the Yast Theater l Ritz Hotel X301-307 North Spurgeon Street, individually listed in the CRHRINRHP}; and the Pacific Electric Substation No. 1 X475 North Lacy Street, individually listed in the CRHRINRHP and as a landmark in the SARHP}. The French Park Historic District, listed in the NRHP in 1999, an approximately ~D-Mock area of tree-lined streets and fine residences, is located directly adjacent to the lacy neighborhood to the north of Civic Center Drive, 5.2 PREVIOUS RESEARCH S.Z. Previously Designated Historical Resources The records search indicated that there are four properties that have been previously designated as historical resources located in the Station District area Table 5.~.1~1, Designatea~ Historical Resources in tf~e Station District}: TA~CE 5.~e E~~ DESIGNATED HIST(~RICAI. RES~]URCES IN THE STATION DISTRICT . ~~~re~s ~lar~e N~~' S 5Q1 East Fifth Street Whitson-Powelson House Key 601 North hush Street United States Post Office, Spurgeon Station ~ x landmark 6Z5 North French Street Ebel) Society of Santa Ana Valley ~ landmark ~Z1 North Spurgeon Street Thomas House Key KEY: NRHP =National Register of H istoric Pf aces CRHR =California Register of Historical Resources SARHP City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties Of these previously designated historical resources, only the UVh'rtson-Powelson House, 501 East Fifth Street, is Agency~owned and is one of the .Z3 buildings that are the subject of the current assessment. No historic districts within the Station District have been listed in the NRHP, CRHR, or SARHP. S.Z.Z Previously Conducted Surveys Since 1980, five prior historic surveys and studies in the vicinity of the Station District and in the surrounding lacy neighborhood have been conducted; p Environmental Coalition of Orange County X1980}~ ~ Historic Resources Group, I.LC ~HRG; ~OOG}~ ~ ICF Janes & Stokes ~200b}5 ~ Les, Kathleen, Environmental Coalition of Orange County, California. May 1980. "Santa Ana Historic 5~urvey, Final Resources Inventory: Downtown." In Santa Ana Hisfioric Survey Final Report. ~ Historic Resources Group, LLC. November ~~a~. i-fistoric and Culfi~~ral Resacrrces Survey, Sar~ta,4na Specific Flan. Administrative Draft. Prepared far: Moule & Palyzaides, Pasadena, CA. 5 ICF Jones & Stakes. November ~~~G. Draft Historical Resources Evaluation. Las Angeles, CA. Prepared for: City of Santa Ana Redevefapment Agency. . Station District Prajec~; ; ~ ~ Historical ~isse,~s~er~t gay 6, Z4 ~ ~ Sapphos Fnvironr~en~:~~1, inc. ~l:1PRO~FCTS1147:~`'~ '`~71DacumentsiNistaricalAssessmer~tiFina115 Results.Doc ~ 5~3 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. ~2ao7~~ ~ Sapphos Environmental, Inc, ~2D~~~' The methadalagiCal approaches of the previously conducted historic surveys and studies have varied between "windshield," "reconnaissance," and "intensive" levels,8 as has the physical scope of these efforts ~e.g., ranging from the Lacy neighborhood, identified in the Santa Ana [Renaissance Specific Plan, to the Station district area, a smaller 94-acre geographic area that is partially located within the southern portion of the Lacy neighborhood, to targeted properties within these areas. The previously conducted historic surveys and studies are briefly described below, and their results are summarized in Table 5.2.2-1, Previous Historical Assessments of 23 Buildings under Consideration in the Station District Area. ~ Sapphos Environmental, Inc. July 2007. Memorandum for the Record No. 4; Potential Listings in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties Located in the Renaissance specific Plan Area. Pasadena, CA. Prepared for; City of Santa Ana, ' Sapphos ~nv'rronmental, Inc. March 200$. Results of Lacy Windshield Survey. Pasadena, CA. ~ Windshield surveys are either conducted on foot or by vehicle and gather visual information about a property. Such surveys are usually documented with photographs and tabulated information, such as address; building type, style, and integrity; and date of construction, Reconnaissance-level survey methodology typically involves a windshield survey that is conducted to gather basic information regarding a property's current physical attributes and condition, including alterations, construction materials and methods, and architectural style. Areconnaissance-level survey might include basic historical research, such as the property's date of construction and architect, if kno~rn. Reconnaissance-level survey results are usually documented on State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Historic Resources Inventory Primary Record forms ~DPR 5.~3 A7. A recannaissancewleve[ survey provides the initial baseline data that is needed to inform an assessment of the property's potential for historical significance, In contrast, an intensive-level survey incorporates the reconnaissance-level survey information and goes further to provide an assessment of significance and includes an identification of historic context, detailed and property-specific historical information such as occupancy history, and an evaluation under specific criteria of significance, This information is documented on State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Historic Resources Inventory forms, usually a Building, Structure, and abject Record ~DPR 52~. B~ ar District Record ~DPR 5~~ D). Station District Project Hr'storical Assessment i~fay b, 2Q11 Sapphos Et~vironrrlental, inc. IN:IPROJ~C~SL~47ii147i-Oa7lDacumentsl~-Irstorical,~sse~~:~~:=r°~YlFina~l5 ~esc~i~ts.Dac Page 5-4 TAB EE 5 r~rL""~ PREV~C~U~ HI~T~RI~AL A~SESSM~ETS ~F 23 ~UILDIN~S UNaER C~N~IC~ERATI~]IV IN THE ~TATI~N DISTRACT AREA hiso~~c a~~~ ~~ti~or~~e~t~~ qty ~ ~r~a Re~~a~rces En~~~o~r~enfa~, ~o~~~~i~~ a ~~~'~~~r ~ro~~, ~~C ICF ayes ~ inc. aunty ~ I~~~~~cai Pry eat 2~~~',~ fro er~~s 5o1 East Fifth Street / Listed in the Whitson-Powelsan - - - - SARHP as a House "Key" property 505 East Fifth Street Altered contributor to the Lacy _ _ Neighborhood - - Conservation Overlay Zane bo1-~~3 East Fifth Contributor to Street the Lacy Neighborhood - - Conservation Overlay Zone 61 D-~12 East Fifth Contributor to Street the Lacy Neighborhood - - - Conservation Overlay Zane 615-~17 East Fifth Contributor to ACS, Appears Eligible far Street the Lacy eligible for the listing in the Neighborhood CRH R as a SARH P as Conservation contributor to "Contributive" Overlay Zone; a CRHR- ~Zoal, 2008 - - contributive eligible district evaluation C through survey potential evaluation designation G20 East Fifth Street Altered 6Z, Found contributor to ineligible for the Lacy N RH P, CRHR, Neighborhood ar local - - Canservation designation Overlay Zone through survey evaluation bZ1 East Fifth Street Contributor to Eligible for the Lacy listing in the Neighborhood - SARHP as - - Conservation ~ "Contributive" Overlay Zane ~2ao8~ 71 Z East Fifth Street Altered contributor to the Lacy Neighborhood - _ - Conservation Overlay Zane Stati~r~ ~~~r~rrrct Profec~ ~-°~.~torjca! Assessmer~~ May 1 Sap;~h~ ~~,~vrronmental, lnc. 1~1~:1~' ~ ~k:r,'~T~ I ~ 471 ~ 147 ~-047~DacumentslHistarical Assessmen~l~inall~ Resu1~5. ADC ~ . Page 5-.~ TABLE 5.~,~~~ PREVIt~U~ H15T~RI~AL AS~ESS~IENTS ~E ~3 BUIEDIN~S UNDER ~~NS6DERATI~N !N THE ~TATI~N DISTRICT AREA, ~'~r~~~nue~" ~eau~~~ E~~r~~o~~er~tal, ~~i~an bf ~~~er ~~ou;~, ~ ~~n~ inc. C~r~~~ o~ ~~~~~1 Pro ;;,~~y ~2~~~~, , S~c~~e~ ~~~~17 " Pry 6U9 East Sixth Street 3CD, Appears SDI, eligible for the Contributor to a CRHRasa district that is contributor to eligible for local a CRH R~ I i sti ng, Lower eligible district French Park through survey Residential evaluation Historic District 613 East Sixth Street 3CD, Appears 5D~, eligible for the Contributor to a CRHRasa district that is _ contributor to _ eligible for local a CRH R- listing, Lower eligible district French Park .thraugh survey Residential evaluation Historic District 617 East Sixth Street 3CD, Appears 5D2, eligible for the Contributor to a CRHRasa district that is contributor to _ eligible i"or local a CRHR- listing, Lower eligible district French Park through survey Residential evaluation Histaric District 710 East Sixth Street 714East Sixth Street Cantributar to 6Z, Found the Lacy ineligible for Neighborhood N RH P, CRH R, Conservation or local - ~verlayZone designation thraugh survey evaluation 720 East Sixth Street Altered Eligible for Cantributar to listing in the the ITacy SARH P as Neighborhaod "Contributive" Conservation X2007, 2008} ~Jverlay Zone, contributive evaluation l potential designation Station 17istrrct Project ~ Nistorrcal Assessment ? May 6, 11 Sapp~ros Environmet~ta~, Inc, 'iN:l~'R~JE~~51147)1471-0071~ocr~~ner~tsl~ ` ~N ~~I,~ssessmer~tiFina115 Resc~lts.~oc Page 5-d TABLE ~.2.~~~ PRE~IIC~U~ HISTORICAL AS~ESSI~EIVT~ ~F 23 BCL~IN~S UNDER C~SIDERATI IN THE STATION DISTRICT AREA C~~r~i~ued I~sa~'r~ ; Sa~o~ " ~nuir~nir~e~it~~ ~y ~f ~ii~a R~saurc~ ~ ~~~i~ ~ ~~~a~ ai ~ n ~ m Ca a# A a ~eg?~~+r~r ~C{~u~?~ .L~ ICIµ ~~rt~ Inca Orar~~ our~y ~ I~s~oric~l Pr~ert k ties ~ , Pry ~~i,e 911 Brawn Streetf 6Z, Found ineligible far NRHP,CRHR, or local designatian _ thraugh survey _ _ eval uatian ~~3-b25 North Altered ~Z, Found 5D2, Garfield Street contributor to ineligible far Cantributor to a the l..acy NRHP, CRHR, district that is Neighbarhaad ar local eligible far local Canservation designatian ~ listing, lower Overlay Zane thraugh survey French Park evaluation Residential HlStarlC District 707 North Garfield Altered 5D2, Street contributor to Contributor to a the Lacy district that is Neighborhood _ eligible far local Conservati an I isti ng, Lower _ overlay Zone French Park Residential H i star i c District 505 North i nter Street _ ~ _ 507 North hinter Cantributor to Eligible far Street the Lacy l i sti ng i n the Neighbarhaad SARHP as Canservatian "Contributive" Overlay Zone ~ZDOS~ ~ i 1 Narth ~iliinter Cantributar to SDI, Street the Lacy Contributor to a Neighborhood district that is Conservation eligible for local overlay Zone ~ listing, Lower French Park Residential Historic District 507 North ~lartimer Street - 5tatran District Project Historical Assessment May 6, 211 Sappl7os Fnviror~mental, inc. - ~J V~:IPPQJECTS11471~~47~-D~7IDoc~rmentsl~~storrcal~ssessmentiFina115 f~est~lts.[;:~~~: ~ Wage -7 TAELE ~a~.~`~~ PREVIOUS HISTORICAL A~SE~~~IENTS OE BUILDING UNDER CONSIDERATION IN THE NATION DISTRICT AREA, Cor~~i~auea~ F~so~~c ~.pp~os En~rirvn~~r~al qty of ~~ta R~~aur~~~ ~n~~rontnehtal, ~Coa~I~Ma~ of A~~ '~~~~+er Orar~~ ~u~ty a~ ~i~ar~~I Pro arty ~~f~ `'toys ~~~~6 ~'r~~e~~ 508-510 North Altered Porter Street contributor to the t.acy _ _ Neighborhood - Conservatian Overlay Zone 801 East Santa Ana Property Nat 5D2, Boulevard previously recommended Contributor to a evaluated as a for designation district that is 5D2 in the in the SARHP eligible far local 1980 Santa ~2008~ listing, Lower Ana H istoric French Park Survey, as a - Residential - contributor to Historic District the Lower French Park Residential Historic District I~E~f NRHP =National Register of Historic Places CRHR =California Register of Historical Resources SARHP = City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties a. Historic Resources group, LLC. November 2046. Historic and' Cultural Resources Survey, Santa Ana fRenaissance~ Specific Plan. Administrative Draft. Prepared for: Moule & Polyzoides, Pasadena, CA. b. ICE Janes & Stokes. November 2006. Draft Historical Resources Evaluatiarr. Los Angeles, CA. Prepared for: City of Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency. c. 5apphas Environmental, (nc. and City of Santa Ana. July 2x07, Memorandum for the Reeard No. Potential Listings in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties Located in the Renaissance Specific Plan Area. Pasadena, CA. Prepared for: City of Santa Ana. d. 5apphas Environmental, Inc. March 2008. Results of Lacy Windshield Survey. Pasadena, CA. e. Environmental Coalition of (Jra~ge County, lnc. Circa 1984, Santa Ana Historic Survey Final Report. Santa Ana, CA. f. The original residence located at this address was identified in the Santa Ana Historic Survey X1980) as a contributor to the Lower French Park Residential Historic District; however, this building was demolished and replaced by the current building, circa 1945, which was moved to the site in 1984, ~r~viro?~men~al ~oalitiar~ of Orarr~e Car~nty, Sawa ~~a ~fi~fa~~~ S~rve~ ~1 In 19$0, a project to inventory historic resources citywide was undertaken by the environmental Coalition of grange County, This survey identified the Eower French Park Residential Historic District with 99 contributing properties located within an area roughly bounded by East Civic Center Drive to the north, Poinsettia Street to the east, East nth Street and Brown Street to the south, and French Street to the west. The potential historic district was evaluated to be of local significance, equivalent to a California Historic Resources ~CHR~ status code of 5D2, As described in the historic resources inventory form prepared for the historic district, the potential historic district comprised a grouping of primarily simple, small, and relatively unadorned transitional cottages and bungalov~rs that were constructed between 1905 and 1925 and were notable for their 5tatior~ District Project Nistarical Assessmer>'t May b, 2011 Sapphos Er~viranmental, Inc. tN:iRRQJECTSl1471I1471-4t;~~~' ``~;=:~3:rGrrer~tslHistoricalAssessmentiFir~all5 Results.[~oc Rage 5-~3 occupancy by working~class residents.g Eight of the 23 buildings that are the subject of this Historical Assessment were identified as contributors.. In addition, the original residence at 911 Brown Street was identified as a contributor; however, this residence was demolished and replaced by the current residence, constructed circa 1945, which was moved to the site in 1984. Since 1980, approximately 63 of the 99 contributing properties that comprised the Lauver French Park Residential Historic district identified in the Santa Ana Historic Survey have been demolished. Hislarr'c Resources group, L1.~, Historic anal Cultural Resources Survey, Sanfia ,4na jRenaissanceJ Specific Plan ~~oo~} This survey was conducted by HRG to provide historic preservation planning recommendations to the Santa Ana ~Renaissancej Specific Plan prepared far ~aule & Palyzoides.'° The reconnaissance- level survey utilized windshield survey methodology for its examination of the Specific Plan area, an irregular area that is bounded roughly by Civic Center Drive and Interstate 5 Santa Ana Freeway} an the north, Grand Avenue on the east, First Street and Fourth Street on the south, and Flower Street on the west. The survey found 257 identified or potential historic buildings eligible for listing in the federal, state, or City of Santa Ana historic registers within the Specific Plan area and recommended three neighborhoods First Street, Lacy, and Logan} far consideration as potential conservation overlay zanes~ The conservation overlay zone proposed far the Lacy neighborhood is bordered on the earth by Civic Center Drive, on the east by Poinsettia Street, on the south by Fourth Street, and on the west by Spurgeon Street and French Street. A conservation overlay zone is a planning tool that is typically used to acknowledge an area's local character or visual continuity and to provide general guidelines. Conservation districts that recognize older areas or historic settlement patterns often contain properties that fall short of meeting the criteria for a local, state, or national historic designation but nevertheless may have cultural or visual importance related to age or design." HRG recommended the establishment of a conservation overlay zone in the Lacy neighborhood on the basis of architectural integrity, citing the presence of several examples of properties with Queen Anne- and Craftsman-style design influences. Of the 23 buildings currently under consideration, 14 were identified by HRG, 7 of which were characterized as "contributors" and 7 as "altered contributors" to a potential Lacy neighborhood conservation overlay zone Table 5.2.2-1}. Two of the 14 properties were also identified as eligible for designation in the SARHP at the "Contributive" level. ICF Jones & Blokes, [~rafl l~r'storical Resources Evaluation (,~00~~ ICF Jones & Stakes conducted a historical resources evaluation to determine if 14 properties being considered by the City of Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency qualify as historical resources under Section 15~~4.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act 4CEQA} Guidelines. Four of the 23 buildings that are the subject of this Historical Assessment were evaluated by ICF Jones & Stokes as eligible far listing in the CRHR and, therefore, as historical resources under CEQA Table 5.2.2-1}. Cif 9 Cal iforn is Department of Parks and Recreation, C3ff ice of H istoric Preservation, lvlarch 1980. H istoric Resources lnver~tory Form: ~.ower French Parr Historic District. Sacramento, CA. '0 H istoric Resources Group, LLC. November ~OOb. Nistaric and Cultural resources Survey, Santa Ana Specific Plan, Administrative Draft. Prepared for; Ivloule ~ Polyzoides, Pasadena, CA. "Historic Resources Group, LLC. November X006. Nistoric and Ccrltura~ Resources Survey, Santa Aria Specific P#ar~. Administrative Draft. Prepared for: Mouie & Polyzoides, Pasadena, C~.. Station District Project ~ Nistorica! Assessment ~Iay 6, ,~Oi I Sapphos Fnviranme~ntal, Inc. UV,IPRC~JECTSII4~II147I-0U71DocumentslNistoricalAssessmer~tlFa.r~~~.;;;''~~~ ~~~~sufts.Doc Page 5-9 the 4 buildings, 3 were identified as contributors to a potentia[ historic district an the GOD block of East Sixth Street ~CHR status code 3CD~, and the fourth was identified as individually eligible far listing in the CRHR ~CHR status cads 3CS~. The rerr~ainder of the properties evaluated in this study were found ineligible far the NRHP, CRHR, and SARHP through survey evaluation ~CHR status code GZ~. Sapphos Enviro?~rnen~al, Inc., I~ernorandurr~ for the Record Ala 4: Po~en~ial ~.is~ings in ~1ae Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties toca~ed in the Renaissance Specific Plan Area ~2007~ In 2407, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. evaluated 34 specific properties targeted by the City of santa Ana located in the Renaissance Specific Plan area for eligibility for inclusion in the sARHP. Based an a preliminary review of photographs dated February 2043 and building permit data, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. concluded that 22 properties appeared to meet the criteria for inclusion and categorization in the SARHP, and S properties did not meet the criteria. Ten of the evaluated properties are located within the Station District Table 5.2,2-1~; S of the 10 were found to be potential historic resources, and 2 were deemed not significant. Two of the ~ potentially eligible properties are among the 23 buildings currently under consideration. Sapphos Environmren~al, inc., Resu?l~s of Lacy Windshield Survey ~ZOO~j As part of the City of Santa Ana's ongoing efforts to identify properties eligible to the SARHP in each of the City's recognized neighborhoods, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. conducted a windshield survey of the Lacy neighborhood. As a result, 14 properties were identified, 1O of which are in the Station District. Four of the 1 D are among the 23 buildings currently under consideration. 5.~ AS~~S~MNTS ~F INC~IVIdUAI SIGNIFICANCE ~F ~3 ~UILDINCS This section provides a summary assessment for each of the 23 buildings under consideration Table 5.3-1, jr~divia~ual,~ssessments of Significance}. ~f the 23 buildings, 7 were identified as historical resources as defined by CEC~A through eligibility for listing on the NRHP, CRHR, or SARHP, while 1 G were evaluated as ineligible far listing and thus did not qualify as historical resources. Cif the 7 eligible properties, 1 appears to be eligible for listing in the NRHP and the CRHR and 1 appears eligible far listing in the CRHR; both properties are ar would be categorized as "Key" in the SARHP, The remaining appeared eligible for the sARHP within the "Contributive" category but did not appear eligible far listing in the NRHP or CRHR, Sta~ron Distrir:t „~°'r°~~~~~ Nrstoric~~,~~ssessrnerrt day b, 2x11 ~r Sa~p~os Fr~v~rc~:~~~~~r~tal,lne. W. IPRUJ~CT~R ~ ~ G~ X71-Oa7lDocumentslHlstorrcal Assessmenr~Frr~all5 Results. DoC ~ ~ P~~~~;~e 5-1 ~ TAELE 5.3-~ INDI~IIC~UAL A~55E~51~El~ITS CAF SiGIVIFI~AI~CE Nvt toy A~r~s ~li~b~ °~~P ~ E~~~e ~~~I~e RAP ~enao~ 501 East Fifth Street ~ ~ 505 Fast Fifth Street x 601--603 East Fifth Street x 610--61 ~ East Fifth Street 615-617 East Fifth Street x 620 East Fifth Street x 621 East F i fth Street x 71 ~ East Fifth Street 609 East Sixth Street 613 East Sixth Street ~ 617 East Sixth Street ~ 710 East Sixth Street x 714 East Sixth Street x 720 East Sixth Street 911 Brown Street ~ 623-625 North Garf iefd Street x 707 North Garfield Street x 505 NOrth Minter Street x 507 North Minter Street x 611 North Minter Street x 507 North Mortimer Street x 508-510 North Porter Street ~ 801 East Santa Ana Boulevard ~ N RH P ~ National Register of H istaric Places CRHR California Register of Historical Resources SARHP =City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties Each summary assessment discusses the results of field surveys and archival research that were conducted to evaluate eligibility under NRHP, CRHR, and SARHP designation criteria. Further information can be found on the State of California Historical Resources Inventory Forms Appendix B, California Historic Resources Inventory DPR 5~3 Forms. 5.3.E 50~ East Fifth Street I VVhitson~Poweison Huse The ~1lhitson-Powelson House, 501 Fast Fifth Street, is a significant historical resource. It has been listed individually in the SARHP under Criterion 1 far its embodir~ier~t of the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural building period associated with a specific period of development. The Vvhitson-Pawelsan House has been categorized as "Key" because it "has a distinctive architectural style and quality" as an example of the Queen Anne ~l..ate Victorian? style. Because of the relative rarity of resources of this type and from this period, it may also be eligible for the SARHP under Criterion 3. At the time the residence was categorized, an NRHP status code of 551 designated, or appears eligible for designation, under a local ordinance; not eligible for the NRHP} and was not evacuated for CRHR eligibility. However, the current assessment has determined that the property does appear eligible far both the NRHP and CRHR under Criterion Cl3 because it is an intact representation of the distinctive characteristics of a late Queen Anne cottage influenced Station district Project ~ Historical Assessment May 6, 2011 ~ Sapphos ~r~viranmental, Inc. ~V;IPI~~JECTSI1471~1471-007IDocumer~tslHistarica~'.~''„: ~~~k~ti;r~s~entlFir~all5 i~esufts.Doc ~ Pale 5-11 by the Colonial Revival typical of the years just before and after the turn of the twentieth century ~CHR status cads 3S~. In particular, the house illustrates the features common to this class of resource, including one-story height, hipped roof, squared plan, front-gabled and cutaway bay, and porch. The house also illustrates the individuality or variation of features associated with this building type, through design elements such as the combination of narrow lap siding and fishscale shingles, carved and jigsaws brackets, ornamental plasterwark, stylized Ionic columns, and use of leaded glass and X-patterned muntins for window glazing. The property exclusive of the garage, which was constructed 18 years after the house and is not significant) retains integrity of location, design, immediate setting, materials, workmanship, and feeling. The property is sat significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria A~1, BfZ, or Dl4 ar under SARHP Criteria 2, 4, 5, ar 6. Historical research has not (orated any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned arganizatians ar businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed circa 1903, the building was sat present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 189. The property, built as asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930, when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5,3.E 5U~ East Fifth Street The residence at 505 East Fifth Street is a significant historical resource. It appears to be individually eligible far inclusion in the SARHP under Criterion 1 as a building with the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style ar period that exemplify a particular architectural style ar design features. It is aturn-of-the-twentieth-century cottage with a modified late Queen Anne plan and Colonial Revival detai I ing. Character-defining features i n this regard include the one-story height, hipped roof with off-set front gable, bull-nosed surround and Palladian-style attic vent in gable end, squared plan, bracketed eaves, narrow lap siding, Tuscan parch columns, and partially intact entry porch. The recommended categorization would be "Contributive" because the building contributes to the overall character and history of a neighborhood or district and is a goad example of period architecture. However, the property does not illustrate the class of resource in the same manner as its neighbor to the west, the Whitson- Powelson House at 5a1 East Fifth Street. Far this reason, and far alterations that somewhat compromise its integrity of design, materials, workmanship, and feeling, the property does sat appear eligible for inclusion is the ~JRHP or the CRHR under Criterion C13. Alterations to the property include enclosure of the north leg of the ~-shaped front parch and replacement of doors and windows. A large concrete storeroom, circa 196, obscures the east side of the facade; however, this addition to the front of the property for commercial use does have some historic interest for its representation of the transition of the neighborhood after its period of significance. The property is sat significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria A11, Bl~, ar D14 or under SARHP Criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, ar Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations ar businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa ~~na were identified at this property Constructed circa 1905, the building was not present ~~~~~~Anr~ ~rstrict Project ~ ~listorica~ Assessment <~~t:~~r X01 ~ ~°,,~~hc~s Fnt!ironmental, lr~c, k; y`, ~'~~"~JEC~S1147111471-0071Dacc~ments~Nistorica~Assessmerrt~~ir~all5 Rescrlts.t~oc Page 5-12 when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1869. The property, a single-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Eacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930 when single- family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address, The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whale style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large. 5'3.3 b~1--6a3 East Fifth street The building at 601-603 East Fifth Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Constructed circa 1945, this two-story, multi-family residence was constructed well outside the period of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930, when single-family residences and duplexes were the predaminant property types in the area, Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development o the City of Santa Ana. Na associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; ar important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. The building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1869, No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is a common, undistinguished example of amulti-family apartment building design, and it does not convey architectural significance as an example of an architectural style ar period or exemplify a style or design features. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, ar designer whale style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large. The building's original design and materials are relatively intact. 5.3.4 b1Q--G1~ East Fifth Street The duplex at 610--612 East Fifth Street is a significant historical resource. it appears to be individually eligible for inclusion in the SARHP under Criterion 1 as a building with the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period that exemplify a particular architectural style ar design features. It is a modest example of a relatively late Craftsman bungalow, constructed circa 1921. Character-defining features in this regard include the one-story height; law pitched, cross-gabled roof with generously overhanging eaves; exposed rafters, beams, and braces; wand slat vents in the gable ends; horizontal lap siding; capacious front porch with elephantine pasts set atop tall pedestals; and overall horizontal emphasis. The recommended categorization would be "Contributive" because the building contributes to the overall character and history of a neighborhood or district and is a goad example of period architecture. The property would also be eligible for the SARHP under Criterion 3 because of the relative scarcity of examples of original Craftsman duplexes in Santa Ana. While possessing integrity of location, materials, workmanship, and feeling, the property does not illustrate the class of resource sufficiently to warrant eligibility far inclusion in the NRHP or the CRHR under Criterion Cf3. ~n addition, the integrity of the Craftsman design has been adversely affected by the shearing off of the rafter tai 1 s i n the eaves. The property is not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria A11, g12, or D14 or under SARHP Criteria 2, 4, 5, or 6. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations ar businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of S~atiar~ District Project ~ H~storrcal Assessrnen~ May 6, ~ ~ S~p~nhos Environmental, lnc. ; , W: ~PPQJ~CTS1147111~71-OD71Docc~~~: , ~y:,~„~,;~~~istorrcal Assessmer~tli'ina1~5 Results. Qac Page 5~ ~3 Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed circa 191, the building was not present when the City of Santa Rna was founded in 1869. The property, atwo-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930 when single family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana white living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.3,5 b15-b~ 7 East Fifth Street The residence at 615-617 East Fifth Street i5 a significant historical resource. It appears individually eligible for inclusion in the SARHP under Criterion 1 as a building with the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period that exemplify a particular architectural style or design features. Constructed circa 1904, it is a vernacular example of a carnbination of several architectural styles popular around the turn of the twentieth century: Queen Anne, Shingle, and Colonial Revival. Features associated with the Queen Anne style include the complex roof configuration incorporating a central hip with flanking front and side gables of medium pitch and the use of fishscale shingles in the gable ends. Shingle style features include the treatment of the (rant-gabled double dormer centered over the facade and the generous porch that wraps the south facade and east elevation. The Tuscan columns used to support the parch roof are typical of the Colonial Revival. The recommended categorization would be "Contributive" because the building contributes to the overall character and history of a neighborhood or district and is a goad example of period architecture. while possessing integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, and feeling, the property does not illustrate the class of resource sufficiently to warrant eligibility for inclusion in the ~1RHP ar the CRHR under Criterion C13. The property is not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria R11, BI2, ar Dl~ ar under SARHP Criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. Na associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Rna were identified at this property. Constructed circa 1904, the buiiding was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1569. The property, constructed as asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930 when single_family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Rna while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, ar designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.3,b b~4 East Fifth Street The building at 620 East Fifth Street does not appear eligible far the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Constructed circa 1909, this example of the American Foursquare style has lost its integrity of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Alterations include replacement of the original woad exterior siding with rough textured stucco; removal of the original porch supports; compromise of the original eave detailing; and addition of asked-roofed, one-story wing at the rear of the building. The building's exterior appearance no longer reflects its period of construction. Station [~rstrict Project Historical Assessment flay ~D ~ ~ Sa~;~hos Environmental, Inc. UV: ~PROJECTSI 1471 L 1471~aa71[~acUmentsLHistorica! AssessmentlFir~al~5 I\'t~;~~~~F'?~°p: ~7c~c Page 5-14 Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. Na associations with important events, famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations or businesses, or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed circa 19U9, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 189. The property, asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930 when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are Known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building cannot be considered far architectural significance or association with a notable architect, builder, or designer due to the extent and severity of the alterations, ,5.3.7 b21 East Fifth Street The residence at ~~1 Fast Fifth Street is a significant historical resource. ~t appears individually eligible far inclusion in the SARHP under Criterion 1 as a building with the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period that exemplify a particular architectural style ar design features. Most likely constructed just before the turn of the twentieth century, it is an exarnpie of a Queen Anne Fate Victorians cottage, Character~defining features include the cross- gabled roof; bands of contrasting patterned shingles in the gable end and frieze; exterior covering of simple, drop siding, sunburst ornament in the front gable face; central cutaway bay; and entry parch configuration and detailing, including slender past and carved brackets. The property would also be eligible for the SARHP under Criterion 3 because of the relative scarcity of examples of Queen Anne cottages in Santa Ana. The recommended categorization would be "Contributive" because the building contributes to the overall character and history of a neighborhood ar district and is a goad example of period architecture, The property does not illustrate the class of resource sufficiently to warrant eligibility for inclusion in the NRHP or the CRHR under Criterion C13. an addition, the integrity of design, materials, and workmanship has been somewhat compromised; one entry on the porch has been enclosed, and the remaining entry has a nonoriginal door. The property is not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria A11, 812, ar Dl4 or under SARHP Criteria 2, 4, 5, or G. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. Na associations with important events; famous people; original settlers, renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. With an estimated construction date in the late 189os ar early 19~Os, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1$~9. As a single-family residence, it is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 193o when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana white living at this address. I he building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, ar designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large. ~r3rV 712 East Fifth Street The residence afi 712 Fast Fifth Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, ar the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Most likely constructed in the late 189as, this example of the Queen Anne Late Victorians has lost its integrity of design, materials, warkrnar~s~h'~i~p, feeling, and association, Alterations include a circa 198D partial-wi~;~th Station District Project°~, HistoricalAsses,~~~~r°~ ~1ay 2011 Sapp~ios Envirorrme~, t~~> lN;1~RUJfCT~~ 1471 I ~ 'i ~:fr ~Doct~r~entslF~istarical Ass~ssme~t~~ina115 Resc~~ts. Doc ~ Pf , f two-story enclosed porch addition that substantially obscures the east half of the original facade, as well as removal of the original entry stairs. Remnants of the original design and materials apparent elsewhere on the exterior include shiplap siding, a gable end clad in fishscale shingles and trimmed with a carved bargeboard, single and paired double-hung sash windows with molded intels and corbel led si Ill, and bracketed eaves. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana, No associations with important events; famous people, original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed circa 1895, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1869. The property, built as asingle-family residence, was built during the primary period of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 193o when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.3,9 6~9 ~a~t Sixth Sheet The residence at Gag fast Sixth Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Constructed circa 19ao-19a1, this turn-af-the-century hip-roofed cottage has lost its integrity of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Alterations include a parch addition or enclosure in a later Craftsman- influenced style, substitution of stucco exterior cladding for the original wood, replacement of most original windows, modification of the entry, and removal of any original architectural detailing. The building's exterior appearance no longer reflects its period of construction. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; ar important centers for political, social, ecanamic, ar cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property, Constructed in 1900-~19~1, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1 Sb9. The property, asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 193o when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whale style influenced architectural develaprrtent in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.~.~~ G13 ~a~t Sixth street The residence at G13 East Sixth Street does not appear eligible far the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Constructed circa 1941, it is a modest and altered example of aturn-of-the-twentieth-century Colonial Revival cottage. The property displays same of the basic character-defining features of the property type, including one- story height, squared plan, hipped roof, and boxed eaves, but has been altered by the application of a veneer band of brick extending from the foundation to window sill level, replacement of the original porch stairs, replacement of same original wand-framed windows with metal sliders, and total replacement of original interior finishes, The~twa turned-wood columns that define the entry Station District Project ~ Hrstorica{Assessment day 6, Z01 ] Sa~phos ~nviror~rner~ta{, ir~c. t~/;1PR~J~C~S1147t~1471MD07IDocumer~tsl~listorica{Assess?~~°rE.:;F`"~~~~{05 Rescr{ts.Doc Page portico are not typical of this period and may also be alterations. As a result of the compromised integrity of design, materials, and workmanship, as well as the lack of distinguishing architectural characteristics that exemplify a particular architectural style ar design features, the property does not qualify far designation in the SARHP under Criterion 1 or the NRHPICRHR under Criterion C13. The property it also not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria All, BIB, ar C~/~ ar under SARHP Criteria Z, 3, 4, 5, or Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property, Constructed circa ~ 9a1, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1869. The property, constructed as asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 193a when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a Hatable architect, builder, ar designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large, 5.3.E 1 b1 ~ East Sixth Street The residence at 617 fast Sixth Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Constructed circa 1903, it is a modest and altered example of aturn-af-the-twentieth century Colonial Revival cartage. The property displays some of the basic character-defining features of the property type, including ane- story height,. squared plan, hipped roof, and recessed partial width porch, but has been altered by the replacement of the original Boar and same of the exterior windows, removal of the porch steps, rebuilt chimney, and construction of ached-roofed addition in the rear, As a result of the co~npramired integrity of design, materials, and workmanship, as weal as the lack of distinguishing architectural characteristics that exemplify a particular architectural style ar design features, the property does not qualify for designation iH the SARHP under Criterion 1 ar the NRHPICRHR under Criterion C13. The property is also not significant under ~fRHPICRHR Criteria A11, 81~, ar ~]4 ar under SARHP Criteria 3, 4, 5, or 6. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations ar businesses; ar important centers far political, racial, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property, Constructed circa 19a3, the building was Hat present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1869. The property, constructed as asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930 when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large. .5~a~!(~!~ ~s'~~~''-pct PfO~~'C~ ~t`~.5~a,:31'lCaj r~55~'SST!'!~'!7r 1~ay d;, ~~:P ~ ~ Sa~p~~a~ ~~~~~lCOf~!?'?e!]~a~, lnc. 'W: ~~F~~~~ 4~: 47~ 11471-~a7~Dacr~mer~~sll~istQrical,4ssessr~~n~l~ina~~5 Rescllts. Day; . ~ Page 5-17 5.3.12 71 ~ East Sixth Street The residence at 710 fast Sixth Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Constructed circa 1901, this one~story residence has been so altered that its original architecture! style can no longer be discerned with certainty. ~t has lost its integrity of design, materials, setting, workmanship, feeling, and association. Alterations include a new roof and fascia, substitution of stucco exterior cladding for the original wood, replacement and resizing of original windows, modification of the porch, and complete removal of any original architectural detailing, The building's exterior appearance no longer reflects its period of construction. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana, No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers far political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed circa 1901, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 189. The property, built as a single~family residence, was built during the primary period of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930, when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. Na persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. 5.3.13 714 East Sixth Street The residence at 714 East Sixth Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. It is a very modest example of a Craftsman bungalow, constructed circa 19x9. The property displays same of the basic character- defining features of the property type, including the one-story height; low pitched, front-gabled roof, full-width recessed porch with square posts; and squared Palladian attic vent in gable end. Although the property retains sufficient integrity to recall its earlier appearance, it lacks the distinguishing architectural characteristics that exemplify Craftsman bungalows in Santa Ana, and superior examples of this property type have been identified and designated elsewhere in the City. The property does not qualify for designation in the SARHP under Criterion 1 ar the NRHPICRHR under Criterion CI3. The property is also not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria A11, PI2, or D14 or under SARHP Criteria Z, 3, 4, 5, or Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. Na associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed circa 1909, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 189. The property, constructed as asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930 when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. Na persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large, Station District Project ~ Historical Assessment May 6, 201 ~ Sa~phos ~nvironmental,lnc. . ~PR~~~CTSI 1471 ~ 147' 1-007~DocurnentslH ~ ~ : f ;~.:~1;~ssessrrlontlFinal45 Results. Doc Page 5~ 1 S 5.3.4 ~~o East 5ix~h street The residence at 72a fast Sixth Street is a significant historical resource. It appears individually eligible for inclusion in the SARHP under Criterion 1 as a building with the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style ar period that exemplify a particular architectural style ar design features. Constructed circa ~ 908, it is an example of aturn-af-the-twentieth-century Colonial Revival cottage. Character-defining features of this property include one-scary height; squared plan; hipped roof; boxed eaves; lap siding trimmed by endboards and a frieze board; L-shaped parch with Tuscan columns used as porch roof supports; window and door surrounds with molded lintels; a highly decorative entry char in the east leg of the parch, featuring a broken pediment aver a window and embellished recessed panels; and art stone foundation. A front gable over the west section of the facade with a molded raking cornice and fishscale shingled gable end suggest the continuing influence of the Cueen Anne style. The recommended categorization would be "Contributive" because the building contributes to the overall character and history of a neighborhood or district and is a goad example of period architecture. The property does not illustrate the class of resource sufficiently to warrant eligibility for inclusion in the NRHP or the CRHR under Criterion C13. The building has experienced relatively minor alterations to the exterior, including the replacement of the porch steps and enclosure of a window, and retains integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, and feeling. The property is not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria AI1, 812, or D14 or under SARHP Criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, or Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. Na associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations ar businesses; or important centers far political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed circa 19aS, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 189. The property, constructed as asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1 S95 to 193a when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. Na persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a Hatable architect, builder, ar designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at 1 arge. 5.3. ~ 5 9 ~ ~ Brown street The residence at 911 grown Street does Hat appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore Hat a historical resource, Constructed circa 1945, this one-story, single-family residence influenced by the Minimal Traditional style was moved to its current location in the Lacy neighborhood in 1984, replacing an alder residence that had been demolished, it therefore has no historical linkage with the development of the neighborhood between 1895 and 1930. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. The building is a common, undistinguished example of its type and does not convey architectural significance as an example of an architectural style or period, or exemplify a style or design features. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large. The building's original design and materials are relatively intact, but it does Hat possess integrity of location, setting, feeling, ar association. station ~lstrict Project Nr'storr'cal Assessment inlay G, 20 ~ ~ Sapphas Fnvironmental,lnc. ~N: IPRUJCTSI 14~ 1 ~ 1471-007~Documer~ts~Nistorical Assessrnent4Finall5 Results. Dc Page 5-19 5.3,1 ~ ~~3~-b~5 North arf~eld street The residence at 62~-625 North Garfield Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Constructed in 1922, this two-story Craftsman former single-family residence has lost its integrity of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Alterations include replacement of the original wood exterior siding with rough textured stucco, replacement of the original porch and balcony roof supports, modification of the parch and balcony railings, compromise of the original eave detailing, conversion into a duplex and addition of new windows and doors, and a rear addition, The building's exterior appearance no Langer reflects its period of construction. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. Na associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations ar businesses; ar important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed in 1922, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1869. The property, built as asingle-family residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 193a when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large. 5.3.17 707 North Garfield Street The residence at 70~ North Garfield Street does not appear eligible far the NRHP, the CRHR, ar the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Constructed in 193, this one-story Colonial Revival cottage has been substantially remodeled in recent years in order to create its current appearance. The windows and doors have been replaced and the porch has been rebuilt, with new posts, brackets, and shingled siding substituted far the original clapboard, The property has last its integrity of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and its exterior appearance na longer reflects its period of construction. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events, famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, ar cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. The building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1869 and postdates the primary period of development of the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 193o. Na persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address, The building is Hat associated with the work of a Hatable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.3.18 505 North Minter Street The residence at 5a5 North ~r4inter Street does not appear eligible far the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Built or moved onto the property after 1949, this tiny, one-story residence has no architectural Style, almost appearing to be built from found materi~°~ls~ its original appearance is unknown. Historical research has not located S~atran C~rs~rict Project Historical Assessment May G, 2Q 11 Sapphas nvironmenta~, Inc, UV:IPRDJFCTSI 147 ~ 4147 ~-tai' ::::~~::~c::: f~~~3nts4Nistorical Assessmer~ti~inal45 Res~rlts. floc gage 5-fin any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; ar important centers far political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this address. The building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1 Bb9, nor when the Lacy neighborhood was substantially developed between 1895 and 1930. Na persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. As an example of a modest vernacular cartage, the building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, ar designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.3.19 507 North IV~inter Street The residence at 507 North Minter Street is a significant historical resource. It appears to be individually eligible far inclusion in the SARHP under Criterion 1 as a building with the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period that exemplify a particular architectural style or design features. An example of a late Queen Anne cottage, the house is estimated to have been constructed in the mid-189os, although Sanborn map and city directory research indicate that it was not located at this address anti! 1918, ~t is possible that the house was originally built at bat Fast Fifth Street and simply maned north on the same lot and turned 90 degrees to face Minter Street. Character-defining features include one-story height; a h i pped roof intersected by afront-gabled wing; shiplap siding; a frieze of sawtoath-finished vertical boards; gabled ends outlined by molded raking cornices with horizontal returns; two-bay parch with slender, chamfered pasts, brackets, and a paneled frieze; two entries off the front porch, each with a transom and paneled door; and single and paired double-hung sash windows. Because of the relative rarity of resources of this type and from this period, it may also be eligible far the SARHP under Criterion 3. The recommended categorization would be "Key" because it "has a distinctive architectural style and quality" as an example of the Queen Anne Late Victorians style. The property also appears eligible for inclusion on the CRHR under Criterion 3 for its embodiment of the distinctive characteristics of a late Queen Anne cottage ~CHR status code 3CS~. The building has experienced relatively minor alterations to the exterior, including aflat-roofed rear addition, and retains integrity of design, materials, workmanship, and feeling. The property is not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria Aft, 812, ar D14 or under SARHP Criteria 2, 4, 5, or b. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. while the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 18b9, it was present in the Lacy neighborhood by 1918, if not 20 years before, during the primary period of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930, Na persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address, The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large. 5.3.~~ b11 North 1~inter Street The apartment complex at b11 North Minter Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefare~.not a historical resource. Although the Station District Project Historical Assessment May 6, 2~ 1 ~ Sappl~as Environmental, lnc. ~l: 4PROJECT51 ~ 471 ~ 1 X71-aD7lDoccrn~entslNistorical Assessment~Fi~r: ' ~ cults. Doc Page 5-2'1 apartment complex is of interest as an example of an adaptation of an apartment court building type, it does not display sufficient character-defining features or integrity to be eligible for designation, The complex consists of three long, rectangular, nearly identical one-start' buildings, each containing four residential units, arranged parallel to each other; and a fourth, single-unit building. An archway spans the driveway between the single-unit building and the southernmost of the multiunit buildings. ether archways pierce wing walls connecting the four-unit buildings to a stuccoed wall and define the two bays of the front porch of the single-unit building, Hoods carried on curved stucco brackets shade the entries to the individual units. The buildings appear to have been resurfaced and original roof detailing and materials have been removed. Constructed in 1930, the buildings as they appear now ~2011~ have no discernable architectural style. The single-unit building was originally a second-start' apartment over a garage; the garage was demolished in 1954 and the apartment was lowered to ground level. Integrity of design, materials, setting, workmanship, and feeling appear to be compromised. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the complex as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. The property was originally occupied by a lodging house. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property since construction of the apartment complex at the end of the primary period of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930. The property is an early example of a multifamily dwelling, a property type that would supersede single-family construction in Lacy during subsequent decades, No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. As an undistinguished example of a multifamily design, the complex is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.3.~~ 507 Noah Mortimer Street The residence at 507 North ~Vlortimer Street does not appear to be eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. A modest example of a turn-of-the-twentieth-century cottage v~ith queen Anne detailing, the house has an estimated. construction date of circa 1900. The property displays some of fihe basic character- defining features of the property type, including one-story height, squared plan, hipped roof, and boxed eaves, as well as less common details in the jigsawn porch frieze and square-butt shingling of the front goblet, but has been compromised by alterations and deterioration. The porch railing and porch stairs are nonoriginal, and no original finishes or plan elements are intact in the interior, As a result Of the compromised integrity of design, materials, and workmanship, the property does not qualify for designation in the SARHP under Criterion 1 ar the NRHPICRHR under Criterion C13. The property is also not significant under NRHPlCRHR Criteria All, 812, or D14 or under SARHP Criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, or Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana, No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers far political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property, The building appeared an historical Sanborn maps of this location sometime between 190b and 1925 and in the city directories in 1923. It is passible that the house was built elsewhere and moved to this location. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. Station Distri4Tt ~`;~~}~°~4Je~t Nistot~i~~~! i`~ssessmen~ day 6, 2011 Sapphos Envtrc~:~ne~~fal,lnc~ w:1P1~oJFC~~~`, ~-.171.007lDor~mentslHistorica~ AssessmentlFina1151~esults.Doc ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ar,~e 5-~~ The building is not associated with the work of a Hatable architect, builder, or designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.3.~~ 5D6-51 ~ North Porter Street The duplex residence at 508--51a North Porter Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. A modest Craftsman duplex constructed circa 1915, it does not display sufficient character-defining features ar integrity to be eligible for designation. The original windows and doors have been removed and the porch screened from view, compromising integrity of design, materials, and workmanship, The bungalow was presumably constructed as infill, probably for income purposes, on the lot occupied by G21 East Fifth Street. Historical research has Hat located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses, or important centers far political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. while not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1 SG9, the building was constructed during the primary period of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. As an undistinguished example of a Craftsman bungalow, the building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whale style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. ~.~.23 SU1 East Santa Ana Boulevard The residence at Sol East Santa Ana Boulevard does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource, Constructed circa 1913, this one-story Colonial Revival 1 Craftsman bungalow has been altered by the replacement of all of its original wood-framed windows with aluminum sliders. Other alterations include the shearing off of the exposed rafter tails in the eaves. The property has last its integrity of design, materials, workmanship, and feeling, Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. No associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations or businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, ar cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were identified at this property. while not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 159, the building was constructed during the primary period of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this address. As a common example of a vernacular bungalow that combines Craftsman and Colonial Revival influences, the building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer whale style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at large. 5.4 PC~TENTAE HISTORIC a~STR[~T ANALYSIS Two previous studies [Environmental Coalition ~1980~ and HRH ~200~}] framed their identification of potential historical resources within the context of a potential historic district. According to the NRHP, "A district possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, ~'tatrQn D~Strict Project ~ I' ~ Nrstorical Assessment May 6, 2D 1 ~ ,~appl~os ~nurronmenta~, Inc. W: IPROJFCTS1147111471-DD7IDocumentslNrstorrey~~~ ~~~~~:mentlFinal~5 Results, Doc Page 5-23 structures or objects united historically ar aesthetically by plan or physical development."'~ A district can consist of both individually significant components as well as features that are individually distinctive and serve as focal paints. A district may even consist entirely of features that lack individual distinction, provided that ~1}the grouping achieves significance as a whale, the majority of the district contributors possess integrity, and ~3} the district as a whale possesses integrity. The Lacy area was initially developed with modest, mostly aneµstory homes built with uniform setbacks on lots with street frontages of approximately 50 feet. By the end of the 192os, the area now known as the Station District was almost entirely built out. White a few properties contained multiple buildings or multifamily homes in the form of duplexes, the area's character was largely derived from its single-family homes. The construction of 611 North hinter Street in 1931 marked the beginning of a slow transition in the neighborhood. The Sanborn map of 1949 illustrates a neighborhood still dominated by homes dating. from the 1895 to 1930 period, but with a few mare apartment houses.' A handful of new buildings were erected in the past-World War If years, primarily for comrnerciai ar industrial purposes clang the eastern fringe of the area, Several of the single~family homes were converted into multiple units. The pace of change accelerated dramatically after 1980, when redevelopment began to be active in the City of Santa Ana. An analysis of construction dates clearly depicts the distribution of new and old properties Figure 5.~4-1, Canstr~rctiar~ Dates3. Based an the transformation of the Lacy neighborhood over the past 30 years since the possibility of a historic district in the area was first studied, it does not appear that there is currently a viable Lacy neighborhood historic district, As previously noted, fully twa~thirds of the potential contributors to the Lauver French Park Residential Historic District have been demolished ar have lost their integrity. The historic character of the Lacy neighborhood has also been deeply affected by the assembly of single-family residential lots into much larger parcels, and by the scale of subsequent multifamily and commercial improvements made to those parcels. Similarly, the large parcels of vacant land have substantially disrupted the ability of the area to convey a sense of historic time and place. The Station District currently comprises approximately 150 parcels of widely varying sizes. Based on the results of this historic assessment, a windshield survey of the Station District as a whole conducted in December 2010, and a period of significance that spans 1 X95 to 1930, only approximately 35 of those 150 parcels contain buildings that could be considered to be contributors to a historic district, based safely on age and architectural type Figure 5.4-2, Signifr'cant Properties r"n tf~e Statron Disfirrct~. The Lacy neighborhood today lacks visual cohesiveness, and its integrity of setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling and association has been compromised by the changes to the neighborhood and by the incompatible alterations made to many of its homes. No single block contains a majority of buildings that could be classified as potential district contributors, due to the prevalence of alterations to character-defining features and intrusions from new construction and empty lots. The overall visual effect of the diversity of property types and construction dates present in the area is such that the area does not convey a special character, historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest and value as a distinct section of the City of Santa Ana ~SARHP 1.J.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Accessed l=ebruary ~a11. ~fatianal Register Bulletin i5: Now to,4pply the ~#ational Register Criteria far Evaluation. Washington, DC. Available at: http:llwww. n ps. govf n rlp u b l i cat i on slb u l l et i n sln rb 151 '3 5anbr~rn Map Company. 188811895119D6119~5 / 1949. Insurance daps of Santa Ana, California, Colorado Springs, CCU. ~~~~~~:tion District project Historical Assessment ;`~.;'~~r 6, ~D 17 ~`~.';~pphos Fnvirorrmental, Inc. :~.~~r`~~JEC7~S1147i11~~1-DD7IDacuments~HistnrrcalAssessmentlFinal~.~ Results.Doc Page 5-.24 "C3 ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~C ~ ~ u ~ Q ~ ~ ° c a ~ c ~ U a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a o ~ ~ d a a 8 ~ ~ o a ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ rn o~ ~ ~ rn rn m c~ rn ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ o~D ~ 6ti ~ CMh ~ 0'~ ~ 0~1 ~ :.r ~ T- ~ ~ f~ ~ 2 s C f4 oU'F U tl~ t.? b. h• s ~rr'4& ~r u>3 ~ ~y. Q' c~e~y E r }~`a i~ rr'LL T„ f~~ x~vO~aJV~u W y~G t~~' hf ~y~rn OICPM9000~YG~19NMbMOW»rnWrMrnwn z ~ O I.fy ~ N ~ 9i f' E Lf L ! ~ U ~ ~5 of C1 ~ r~ ~ ~ a ~ = c t o ~ ~ ~ o ~ U ~ ~ c ~ a u ~ s v.. ~N ~F+ C~J ~ C ~ ~ Q 'vs C a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r C ~ ~ ~ Q M= l!7 ~ ~ l~ Q.. Q,. ~ `ti - 4 fC fG 1,J U C ~ y p `C7 Z7 C7 ~ bA I ~ ~ ~ ~ v r a y .Q il a t~. eC i 1 1 l _ i t ~wwwrew~ 1 " 1 f ~ _ r' . I M. ~ L mm i i..~ ~~~oss~ww r D C3 District Criterion A~, The area provides fevrr significant examples of architectural values of the past or landmarks in the history of architecture ~SARHP District Criterion Neither is the area able to function as a reminder of past eras, events, or persons important in the history of the city, the county, the state, or the United States of America or illustrates past living styles for future generations to observe, study, or inhabit ~SAR~IP District Criterion C~. m~.~. .~.......Mt:...---• ~ - Station District Proje:.;,, ~ Historical Asse~.~s r~~~4t May 6, 2G 11 Sapphos Fnviranmer~t:~~~;G it a~;, ~:IP~Uj~CTS~ 1471 I h , ' ; ^ 'xlDacur~entsll~istorica~ ~4ssessr~errt~l=irtall5l~esc~~ts, Doc P~~ ; ~ { z ~I~CTI~ d~~ R~F~RE~CES California Code of Pegulatians. Title 14, Section 4852 ~c}, and Division Chapter 3, Sectian 15000-15387, Appendix CEQA Guidelines. Califarnia Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, March 1980. Historic Resources Inventory Form: Lower French Park Historic District. Sacramento, CA. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation. 14 April X009. grange County Historic Property Data File. Sacramento, CA. Califarnia Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation. X009. California Historic l..an~marks. Fullerton, CA; California State University, Fullerton, Department of Anthropology, South Central Coastal Information Center, California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation. 2009. Califarnia Paints of F-listorical interest. Fullerton, CA: California State University, Fullerton, Department of Anthropology, South Central Coastal Information Center. Califarnia Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation. ~0Q9. National Register of I-listaric Places. Fullerton, CA: California State University,Fullertan, Department of Anthropology, South Central Coastal Information Center. California PU~lic Peso~rces Code. Sections 5024.1 ~a) and 504,1 ~c~; and Division Thirteen, Statutes X1083.2, X1084.1. City of Santa Ana, Cal ifarnia. U plated 12 October 2Q09. Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Available at: http;/lwww.ci.santa- ana.ca.uslpbalplanningldacumentslH istoric-Register.pdf City of Santa Ana, California. May 2010. Transit Zoning Cade LSD 84A and SD 84B} Environmental Impact Report, SCH Na. 200071100. Prepared by; PBS & j, Los Angeles, CA. Volume 1: Draft EIR, p. 1~1. City of Santa Ana, California, May 2010. Transit Zoning Cade LSD 84A and SD 848 Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH No, 200071100. Prepared by: PBS & J, Las Angeles, CA. Volume 1 a, p. 9-1. City of Santa Ana, California. Accessed 2 February 2011. "Lacy I`•leighbc~r'r~oud Map," Available at: http:C/www.ci.Santa-ana.ca.us~cdaidocumentslLacyMap.pdf City of Santa Ana, California. Code of Orafinances. Chapter 30, Places of Historical and Architectural Significance, Sectian 30. City of Santa Ana Planning Division. 20 September 1982. City of Santa Ana General Plan Conservation Element 1982. Station District Project ~ ~ Historical Assessment IVlay 6, 2011 Sapphos Environmental, lr~c. VII:IPRO~ECTSI 147141471-OO71Dac~rments~~listorica~ Assess F ~ ,~;.`al4G Peferences, Doc Page 6-1 City of Santa Ana Planning Division. 2 February 1998. City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element 1998. City of Santa Ana Planning Division. ~ July 1998. City of Santa Ana General Plan Urban Design Element 1998. City of Santa Ana Planning Division. 19 October 2009, City of Santa Ana General Plan Housing Element 200--2014. Cove of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR X0.2 and ~a.4. Historic Resources Group, LLC. November 2oob. Historic and Cultural Resources Survey, .Santa Ana Specific Plan, Administrative Draft, Prepared for: Maule ~ Poly aides, Pasadena, CA. 1CF Jones & Stokes. November 200. Graft Historical Resources Evaluation. Los Angeles, CA. Prepared for: City of Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency. Jandl, H. !Nerd. October 1988. Preservation Brief loo. 18: Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings: Identifying and Preserving Character-:Defining ~lerr~ents. vltash i ngton, DC: U .S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services, Available at: www.cr.nps.govlhpsltpslbriefslbrief18.htm Les, Kathleen, Environmental Coalition of Orange County, California. May 1980. "Santa Ana Historic Survey, Final Resources Inventory: Downtown," In Santa Ana Historic Survey Final Report. Nelson, Lee H. September 1988. Preservation Brief Na. 17: Architectural Character: Identifying fife Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services. Available at: www.cr.nps.govlhpsltpslbriefs/briefl7,htm Office of Historic Preservation. March 1995. Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Sacramento, CA. Available at: http:llohp.parks.ca.gov Office of Historic Preservation. Accessed 2 February 2011. "California Historical Landmarks," Avai !able at: http:llohp,parks.ca.gou Office of Historic Preservation. Accessed 2 February 2011. "California Points of Historical Interest." Avai !able at: http:llohp.parks.ca.gov office of Historic Preservation. n.d. "Technical Assistance 8uiletin California Register and National Register, A Comparison for Purposes of Determining Eligibility for the California Register." Available at: http:Ilwww.ohp.parks.ca.gov Sanborn Map Company. 1888 { 1895 l 190G 1 1 925 1 1 949, Insurance Maps of Santa Ana, California. Colorado Springs, CO. Sapphos Environmental, Inc. July 2007, Memorandum for the Record No. 4: Potential Listings in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties Located in the Renaissance Specific Pian ~~,rea, Pasadena, CA. Prepared for: City of Santa Ana. Statia~~ :!A°s`~,~~ct Prajec~ _.~`~~;.~~r~rrcal Assessment r May f ~ ? Sappy rr t~~ ~~iranmenta ,1nc, Vv: ~PR~;- ~:T~ A 1471 114 1~0471Dacumen~s~Nis~or~cal Assessmentl~inall6 References, Doc ~ Page 6-2 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. March 2008. Results of Lacy Windshield Survey. Pasadena, CA. U,S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Accessed 18 August 2D06. National Register Bulletin 24, Guidelines far focal Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning. Wash i ngtan, DC~ Avai fable at: http:llWwW.cr.nps.gavlnrlpubl icationslbu lleti nslnrb241chapter 1.htm U.S. department of the Interior, National Park Service, Accessed ~ February 2x11. !National Register Bulletin 15: How to Apply the National Register Criteria far Evaluation, Washington, D~. Available at: http;IlWWw.nps.govlnrlpublicatianslbulletinslnrb151 U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Accessed 2 February 2411. The Secretary of the jnterior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. Washington, DC. Available at; http;llWwW.nps.gavlhpsltpslstandguidel U.S. Geological Survey, [195] Photo revised 1981.7.5-Minute Series, South Gate, California, Topographic quadrangle. Reston, VA, CJnited States Code, 16 USC 470. Weeks, Kay D,, and Anne E. Grimmer. 1995, The Secretary of the lnteriar's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Station District Project ~1 Historical Assessment inlay 2~ 11 Sapphos Environmental, lnc. 4N:1l~RDJEC~S1)~71 ~ 14? l-OQ7lE~ocur~ents~~ ~p{. ~;ru~~l ~ssessmer~tlFinall~ references. Doc ~ Page b-3 APPENDIX A RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL Leslie Hecrr~ar~r~ Master afArts, Architecture, Ms. Leslie Heumann manages the multi-disciplinary cultural resources group at University of California, Los Sapphos Environmental, Inc. An architectural historian with aver 33 years of Angeles ~197G-1.918; incomplete) experience covering all aspects of historic architectural evaluation, documentation, and preservation, she specializes in coordination of historic Bachelor Qf Arts, History, resources surveys, assessment of historic significance, and preparation of University afCalifornia, Cos documentation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA}, Angeles, 1975 National Historic Preservation Act ~NHPA}, and National Environmental Policy Section 100 Essentials, Advistory Act ~NEPA}, She satisfies the secretary of the Interior's professional qualification Council on Historic Preservation, standards as an architectural historian. 2009 As manager of the cultural resources group, Ms. Heumann has overseen the Cultural Resources Manager; analysis of cultural resources with respect to paleontological, archaeological, Architectural Historian and historical resources, Native American Sacred Sites, and human remains. Recent projects have entailed the characterization of baseline conditions, • Historic resources surveys determination of project impacts, and recommendation of mitigation and • NRHP nominations avoidance measures in support of G,44D-acre and 15,E 82-acre wind energy • Historic resources impact protects in Kern County, California, and a 9,~~4-acre dust mitigation project in analyses in support of NEPA Owens Valley, California. These efforts have encompassed comprehensive and CFQA, and Section 1 D6 records searches, Phase I archaeological surveys, and preparation of cultural a{the I~HPA resources technical reports and have enabled clients to achieve project • HistaricAmerican Buildings objectives while avoiding and/or minimizing potential project impacts on Survey ~HABS~ cultural resources. Ms. Heumann has coordinated with a variety of entities, • Secretary of the Interior"s including the Bureau of Land Management, the California state Lands Standards for the Treatment Commission, the Office of Historic Preservation, and the Native American of Historic Properties Heritage Commission in connection with these studies, Years of Experience: 33 In her capacity as an architectural historian, Ms. Heumann has undertaken the identification, evaluation, and documentation of historic resources for an Relevant Fxperier~ce: extensive body of properties in the Southwest, including California, Texas, Arizona, Nevada, and Hawaii. She has directed or participated in intensive- • Historic Resources Consultant and reconnaissance-level historic resources surveys far the Cities of Santa Ana, to the City of Santa Ana, Alhambra, Beverly Hills, Costa Mesa, Glendale, Huntington Beach, Long 2000-2009 Beach, L,os Angeles, Pasadena, Rancho Mirage, San Clemente, Santa Monica, • City of Lang Beach Historic Upland, and West Hol lywaod, among others. She is an expert in Section ~ B~ Context Statement (2009 of the NHPA and has prepared historic property surveys, findings of effects, and ~ Cultural Resources Technical Memoranda of Agreement for California Department of Transportation projects Reports: County of Los in Upland and Alhambra, a Vandenberg Air Farce Base facility, and a historic Angeles Data Center, 2009; ranch complex on the site of a proposed housing development in the Santa Kroc Community Center, C.larita Valley, Long Beach, 2009; Pacific Winds UVir~d Energy Project, Additional areas of expertise include Historic American Buildings Survey Kern County,Z009 , • Historic Resources Technical ~HABS) documentation, application of the Secretary of the Interior s Standards Reports: Rehabilitation and far the Treatment of Historic Properties, and historic schools modernization Adapt~v4.14f11J1! ~he Bodily issues. Ms. Heumann Es currentl overseen a multi-m~ll~on--dollar effort to r a 1?~rr~a nit y House Garage, Descanso assess the feasibility for reuse of, and prepare HABs packages far, 73 buildings Gardens, 2009; South and structures comprising a former poor farm that has been formally Pasadena Downtown determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places Revitali~atian Project, 2007 (NRHP}. She has authored several nominations to the NRHP, most recently for Main Street Redevelopment the Bungalow Heaven district of Pasadena, and has prepared hundreds of Corridor, Alhambra, 2Q06 applications and categarizationsfnr listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historic ~ ~iistoricAssessments: Ray Properties. At present" she is part of an elite team of specialists that is 1~ines Chrysler Plymouth developing a Historic Context Statement for the City of Las Angeles. Dealership Building, Long Beach, 2010; World Citrus Ms. Heumann often provides expert testimony to local planning and cultural West Plant, Fullerton, 2008; resources commissions and city councils and has had the opportunity to share 1584 F. Santa Clara, Sang i~er knowledge through speaking at numerous conferences and gatherings, Ana, 2007 most recently to the ZOOS national conference of the Association cif Environmental Professionals. W: [PRC~jECTSi 1471 11411-0f:.~ ~~i~ »::°x¢~rients~Historical Assessmer~tiLjH Santa Ana, Doc I~arlr~~ Fra~~nard~~ II~LA Master of Landscape Marline Fratinardo, senior cultural resources coordinator far Sapphos Architecture fHistoric Environmental, Inc., has mare than nine years of professional and Preservation Certificate}, academic experience in the practice of historic preservation, urban University of Colorado, planning, and applied architectural history in the United States and Denver, 200 abroad. Ms. Fratinarda's qualifications meet and exceed the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards in Architectural Graduate Study, Landscape History, History, and Historic Preservation Planning. Architecture and Urbanism, Delft As an architectural historian, Ms. Fratinardo has evaluated a diverse University of Technology, range of property types and has conducted historic resource assessments the Netherlands, 2~~~5 far ro`ects in Los An eles Santa Monica Ira una Beach west p 1 g ~ ~ g , Hollywood, Santa Ana, wiilawbrook, Santa Clarita, and Pasadena, She Bachelor of Arts Anthropology, Bryn Mawr has prepared Historic American Buildings Survey ~HABS} documentation College, Bryn Mawr, PA, for the Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center in Downey, tg~~ California. Ms. Fratinardo has demonstrated expertise ~n CaC~fornia Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA}, National Environmental PoCicy Act Senior Cultural Resource ~NEPA} documentation, particularly in developing historical resources Coordinator sections, technical reports, and mitigation recommendations to reduce impacts to h i stori cal resources. • CEQAINFPA documentation In her capacity as an urban planner, Ms. Fratinardo advised local National Register of governments and community groups on the process of integrating Historic Places historic preservation goals into local planning efforts by participating in Nominations the development of historic preservation ordinances, design standards, # Historic American unified development codes and growth management plans that Buildings Survey addressed community character, aesthetics, and local identity for documentation municipalities throughout the United States. She analyzed and critiqued • Historic resources surveys dozens of historic preservation ordinances for the California Office of Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Technical Assistance Series, Bulletin No. 1~, Standards far the Drafting Effective Historic Rreservation Qrdinances: ~ Manual for Treatment of Historic California's focal Governments ~Zaa5}, A specialist in preservation Properties documentation economics, Ms, Fratinardo prepared two comprehensive statewide ~ Preservation economics studies on the economic benefits of historic preservation on behalf of the Cultural landscapes Colorado Historical Society and the Michigan Historic Preservation Network. Years of Experience: 9 Her professional background includes numerous projects aimed at the Relevant Experience: revitalization of historic properties. She has prepared National Register of Historic Places nominations and preservation grant applications, Martin Luther King, Jr, including a successful grant application x$200,000} for a historic Hospital Cultural rehabilitation project in Ria Blanco County, Colorado, Ms. Fratinardo Resources Technical authored the historic context and established eligibility requirements far Report fin progress historic designed landscapes as a contributor to the City of Los Angeles ~ Rancho Los Amigos Historic Resources Survey project ~Surveyl.A}. As a participant in the U.S. National Rehabllrtat~an National Committee of the International Council on Monuments and Center Cultural Resources Sites ~USIIC~MC~S} International Exchan e Pro ram she worked in Technical Report ~~n g g ' progress partnership with TURATH Heritage Management Consultants and LA Plaza de Cultura y community members to develop a historic preservation plan for a historic Arses Section ~ 0~ rehabilitation project in Al-Hausan, Jordan. Compliance Report (in progress} Ms. Frati nardo's areas of interest include cu Itural landscapes, preservation economics, parks, and infrastructure. She is a member of the U.5. National Committee of.the International Council on Monuments and Sites ~USIICOM~S}, H"I~~:~`,o°~"~:: Gardens and Cultural Landscapes Committee, and the Los A~~g~~ Conservancy. 'Irk,IPRDJ~CTSI1~7t41~7fM007iDacumentslNistoricalAssesstnent4~~$~`~; :A~~~~~~s APPENDIX 8 CALIFORNIA HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY DPR 523 FORMS