HomeMy WebLinkAbout110613_2011-11_3796SBristol0
1:1rQ11y`Kyisi
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING VARIANCE NO.
2011-08 AS CONDITIONED TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED
PARKING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3600
THROUGH 3796 SOUTH BRISTOL STREET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. Applicant is requesting approval of Variance No. 2011-08 to reduce the
required parking standards for a new restaurant / retail building within the
Metro Town Square Shopping Center at 3600 through 3796 South Bristol
Street.
B. Variance No. 2011-08 came before the Planning Commission of the City
• of Santa Ana for a duly noticed public hearing on June 13, 2011, to
consider all testimony, written and oral.
C. Variance No. 2011-08 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana seeking to
reduce the required parking standards set by Santa Ana Municipal Code
section 41-1341.
D. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning
Commission to grant a variance upon making certain findings.
1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found
to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at
variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this
chapter.
The project site has a special circumstance related to its
location and surroundings. The proposed use will be located
within a built out development site on South Bristol Street
that is surrounded by commercial and residential uses. Due
to its location, there is no feasible option for providing
additional parking for the new uses. In addition, the shared
• parking analysis prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan
has determined that sufficient parking will be provided for the
Resolution No. 2011-11
Page 1 of 5
• project by utilizing multiple methods. The study concluded
that even under peak demand, a minimum of 392 parking
spaces will be available within the shopping center. As a
result, the parking variance will allow the applicant the ability
to use the property in a manner that is consistent with similar
surrounding commercial uses.
2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights.
The granting of the variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
The granting of the parking variance will preserve the
property owner's ability to lease the buildings with uses that
will identify the site as an economically viable development.
Further, the reduction in parking will provide flexibility of
leasing options that would support Policy 2.7 and policy 5.7
of the Land Use Element of the General Plan which
promotes rehabilitation of commercial properties and
encourages increased levels of investment while anticipating
that intensity of new development does not exceed available
capacity.
• 3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property.
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the
public or surrounding properties. As demonstrated in the
parking analysis for the project, the site will have sufficient
parking to accommodate the various uses during the peak
parking hours. Therefore, the reduction in parking will not be
detrimental to the surrounding community as it will not result
in parking impacts affecting adjacent commercial or
residential neighborhoods. Further, the site is in compliance
with all other development standards applicable to the
property.
4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General
Plan of the City.
Finally, the project will not adversely affect the general plan
as the proposed commercial uses are consistent with Goals
1 and 2 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
These goals encourage uses such as retail, office and eating
establishments that promote a balance of land uses to
• address basic community needs and which enhance the
City's economic and fiscal viability. In addition, the project is
Resolution No. 2011-11
Page 2 of 5
consistent with Policy 1.9 which encourages new
•
development along arterial intersections in commercial
district such as South Bristol Street and Policy 5.4 in support
of land uses which are compatible with surrounding uses.
E. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3),
which is a general rule exemption applying to projects that have no
possibility of having a significant effect on the environment. Categorical
Exemption Environmental Review No. 2011-10 will be filed for this project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission, after conducting the public hearing, hereby
approves Variance No. 2011-08 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein, to reduce the required parking standards for a restaurant / retail
building within the Metro Town Square Shopping Center at 3600 through 3796 South
Bristol Street. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said
hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission
Action dated June 13, 2011, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, all
of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 2011.
• AYES: Commissioners: Acosta, Gartner, Mill, Nalle, Turner, Yrarrazaval (6)
NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSENT: Commissioners: Alderete (1)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0)
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph �. Straka, City Attorney
Ryan T
• Assista
Resolution No. 2011-11
Page 3 of 5
• CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
0
0
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Secretary of the Planning Commission, do hereby attest to and
certify the attached Resolution No. 2011-11 to be the original resolution adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on June 13, 2011
Date: /'�l% /v
'i,`,T-l_.-- 1,
Secretary of the Planning oC,�ttssio
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2011-11
Page 4 of 5
• Conditions for Approval for Variance No. 2011-08
Should the Planning Commission approve Variance No. 2011-08, the approval is subject
to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable
sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the
California Building Standards Code and all other applicable regulations.
The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed belowrip or to
exercising the rights conferred by this variance.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life
of the variance. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the
revocation of the variance.
A. Planning Division
All proposed improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review
approval of DP No. 2011-01 and the staff report exhibits.
2. Any amendment to this variance must be submitted to the Planning
Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief
is
is available or the variance must be amended.
3. Landscaping, once installed, shall be maintained per the approved
landscape plan. After project occupancy, landscaping is to be
maintained to include the minimum level of plant materials installed at the
time of occupancy and per the approved plan.
Resolution No. 2011-11
Page 5 of 5