Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout110627_2011-12_601SSantaFe• ROH - 06/27/11 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011-14 TO ALLOW A 60 -FOOT HIGH WIRELESS FACILITY ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 SOUTH SANTA FE STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-14 came before the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana for a duly noticed public hearing on June 27, 2011. B. Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-14 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana seeking to allow a 60 -foot high wireless facility stealthed as a • monopine on the property located at 601 South Santa Fe Street. C. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-198.10, a Conditional Use Permit is required for major wireless communication facilities established in the City of Santa Ana. D. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a conditional use permit upon making certain findings. 1. Will the proposed use provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community? The proposed 60 -foot tall cellular monopine will provide a service to Santa Ana residents, businesses and motorists who subscribe to Metro PCS's services by reducing the gaps in digital cellular service and providing additional calling capacity for its users, especially for those users traveling within the central sector of Santa Ana. 2. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons • residing or working in the vicinity? Resolution No. 2011-12 Page 1 of 6 • Federal law exempts local jurisdictions from regulating health related issues as these issues are covered under Federal laws. However, the proposed facility will be in compliance with both the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations. 3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area? The proposed monopine, in conjunction with the new live pine trees and required site improvements, will be compatible with the surrounding area and will not adversely affect the economic viability in the area. The stealth appearance and site upgrades will be the major solution to maintaining and increasing the economic stability for this industrial corridor. 4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use? The cellular facility has been designed to comply with the regulations and conditions identified in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code for a major wireless facility. • 5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any specific plan of the City? The proposed monopine facility will not adversely affect the General Plan as cellular facilities that are designed to be compatible with the surrounding environment are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Industrial (IND) General Plan land use designation. Policy 2.2 of the Land Use Element encourages land uses that accommodate the City's needs for services. E. This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15303. This Class 3 exemption allows in -fill developments for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2010-123 will be filed for this project. Section 2. The Planning Commission, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-14 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated June 27, 2011, and exhibits attached thereto; and • the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference Resolution No. 2011-12 Page 2 of 6 0 • 0 ADOPTED this 27th day of June, 2011 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Acosta, Alderete, Gartner, Mill, Yrarrazaval (5) NOES: Commissioners ABSENT: Commissioners ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph A„Straka, City Attorney Ryan None (0) Nalle, Turner (2) None (0) Chairman CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Martha Ramirez, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2011-12 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on June 27, 2011. Date: Isnning Commissl 1�eCr ry City of Santa Ana '- Resolution No. 2011-12 Page 3 of 6 • Conditions for Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-14 Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-14 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed belowrip or to exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit. A. Planning Division 1. The applicant must comply with all conditions and requirements of the Development Review Committee for the development project (DP 2010-41). 2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit must be amended. • 3. The proposed monopine shall be constructed as per approved plans and any existing landscaping shall be protected in place during the construction period for the 60 -foot monopine facility. 4. Prior to issuance of an electrical meter, the following improvements shall be completed: a. Construction of anew trash enclosure for the building. b. Removal of all graffiti on the premises. c. Maintenance of all on-site landscaping, including the removal of weeds. d. Repairing of the wrought iron fence located at the front of the property. 5. The proposed monopine shall be constructed per the following specifications: a. The monopine should have 3.1 branches per foot for full density coverage with limited spacing between the branches; 70 percent of the branches should be eight feet or longer. • Exhibit A Page 1 of 3 Resolution No. 2011-12 Page 4 of 6 • b. Branch disbursement should be random so that longer branches and shorter branches are intermingled to give a natural appearance. c. Branches should exceed all antennas by a minimum of 12 inches. d. Branches should start at 15 feet above the ground. e. There should be a minimum space of seven feet between the top of the antenna and the top of the branches. f. Branches should have an upward sweep similar to that of actual Canary Island Pines. g. Branch foliage color should be an olive green with some brown "needles" to match an actual Canary Island Pine. A sample should be submitted for approval prior to fabrication. h. Full bark cladding with a custom color should be submitted for approval prior to fabrication. i. All antennas shall be covered with "pine antenna socks" that match the approved foliage color. • j. All "stand-off mounts" and support pipe mounts shall be concealed behind antennas and painted a darker shade or green (or black) with a "flat" paint finish to reduce reflection and visibility of the mounting. k. Include the tree specifications (selected manufacturers and models) with photo simulations (also a site plan review requirement). I. Show the location of the GPS antenna on all elevations. m. Provide a "unistrut" detail for the utility cabinet; an "H -frame" is not acceptable. n. Provide a note on the plans stating "install underground utilities sleeving for two carriers during construction of the structure". Shrouds on the outside of the pole are not acceptable. o. All exterior conduit and electrical meters shall be installed and screened in one metal enclosure painted to match the structure. 6. At all times, the permit applicant shall not prevent the City of Santa Ana from having adequate spectrum capacity on the City's 800 MHz radio frequency. • Exhibit A Page 2 of 3 Resolution No. 2011-12 Page 5 of 6 • 7. The permit applicant shall provide a 24-hour phone number to which interference problems may be reported. This condition will also apply to all existing facilities in the City of Santa Ana. 8. The permit applicant will provide a "single point of contact" in its Engineering and Maintenance Departments to insure continuity on all interference issues. The name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address of that person shall be provided to the City's designated representative upon activation of the facility. 9. The permit applicant shall insure that lessee or other user(s) shall comply with the terms and conditions of this permit, and shall be responsible for the failure of any lessee or other users under the control of permit applicant to comply. 10. The permit applicant shall provide a coverage and cell site location map for each existing and proposed facility in Santa Ana. 11. Locate all equipment and related appurtenances (appleton plug and electric meter) on the inside of the existing equipment enclosure or inside the building and underground all electrical power from the utility source shown on the approved site plan. 12. Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-14 expires 10 years from the date of City Council approval. 11 • Exhibit A Page 3 of 3 Resolution No. 2011-12 Page 6 of 6