Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout75A - PH - BOUNDARY WARD CHANGESREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2011 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER NEW CITY COUNCIL WARD BOUNDARY LINES C� I� CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1" Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Adopt an ordinance changing the boundary lines of the City Council Wards. DISCUSSION Every 10 years, the City of Santa Ana reviews its City Council Ward boundaries to account for shifts and changes in the population. The reboundary process for City Council Wards is based on the population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. The basic goal of the reboundary process as required by the City Charter is to redraw the Council Ward boundaries so that the wards are equal in population. According to the 2010 Census, Santa Ana's population is 324,528, a decrease of more than 13,400 residents from the 2000 Census, which indicated that Santa Ana had 337,977 residents. The population shifts within each ward are significant enough to require new boundary lines to be redrawn - the largest gap between Ward 4 with 47,941 residents and Ward 6 with 59,396, a difference of more than 12,000 residents, the average being 54,088. This proposed reboundary is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Section 15320 — Class 20 (Changes in Organization of Local Agencies) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, since it involves a proposed reorganization of the City Council Wards and does not change the geographical area in which previously existing powers are exercised. What is Re- boundary and why do it? Re- boundary is the redrawing or adjusting of Ward lines to ensure that legislative representation is fair and balanced. It is done every ten years, after the census data is compiled, to account for population shifts and growth over the last decade. The purpose is to 75A -1 Public Hearing: Consider New City Council Ward Boundary Lines December 19, 2011 Page 2 of 4 bring Wards back into compliance with equal population representation. The number of Wards in the City are to remain the same. Re- boundary Standards When deciding upon a proposed map, the City Council must keep in mind certain standards in order to comply with the law. The following are mandatory for any proposed map: • The wards must be as nearly equal in population as may be (Elections Code § 21601). Exact equality of population is not required for the wards, but they should strive to create wards that have a total population deviation of no more than 10% between their most heavily populated ward and the least populated wards. Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 772 (1973). • The City Council may also rely upon the following "traditional" re- boundary factors when deciding upon a map: • Cohesiveness, continuity, integrity, and compactness of territory (Elections Code § 21601) • Community of interest (Elections Code § 21601) • Finally, the following are additional criteria which are also acceptable to consider: • Traditional boundaries • Preservation of core of prior Wards Current and Proposed Map An Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Councilmembers Tinajero, Benavides, and Martinez reviewed the data and recommends approval of Proposed Map #2 that provides the most equity amongst each Ward. An initial proposal was prepared by the Committee and following feedback received from the community, a revised map was prepared and is being recommended for approval. Proposal #2 makes minor adjustments to the original proposal and maintains some of the original boundary lines while balancing the population even closer to average goal of 54,088. The attached Proposed Map #2 includes original boundary lines marked in red with the proposed ward boundaries in different colors; current and proposed population breakdown by Ward. A map depicting current and proposed Neighborhood Associations is included as an example of community of interest - the Committee made an effort to keep neighborhoods together as much as possible. The Clerk of the Council Office has not received any other proposals and only one email commenting on the matter that is included to this agenda report and made part of the record. Any other proposed maps or communication received by members of the public will be made available to the Council for consideration. 75A -2 Public Hearing: Consider New City Council Ward Boundary Lines December 19, 2011 Page 3 of 4 Charter Requirements As reference, the City's Charter specifically addresses Wards and boundary changes as follow: Sec. 101.1. - Wards of the city. Prior to the general election in 1988 the City Council shall divide the City into six (6) wards by ordinance according to the following formula: Each of the wards is to be as nearly equal in population as possible. The wards shall be composed of contiguous and compact territory and bounded by natural boundaries of street lines wherever possible. Any territory hereafter annexed to or consolidated with the City shall become a part of the ward to which it is most contiguous, pending any reboundary necessary to promote equality of population among the wards. (Ord. No. NS- 1316, 8- 24 -76, approved at election 11 -2 -76; Ord. No. NS -1521, 3- 17 -80, approved at election 6 -3 -80; Ord. No. NS -1864, 8- 19 -86, approved at election 11 -4 -86) Sec. 101.2. - Wards, boundary changes. Ward boundaries shall not be altered except as reasonably necessary to promote greater equality of population among the wards when such necessity is shown by the most recent federal decennial census, or by more current census data certified by the City Council as sufficiently reliable and detailed to serve as a basis for ward boundary alteration, or by annexation or consolidation of territory. Such boundary alteration shall be made only by ordinance adopted by affirmative vote of at least two - thirds (213) of the full membership of the City Council in accordance with section 101.4. Any such ordinance adopted within one hundred twenty (120) days immediately preceding any election of council members shall not become effective until the day following such election. (Ord. No. NS -1316, 8- 24 -76, approved at election 11 -2 -76) Sec. 101.3. - Reserved. Editor's note— Ord. No. NS -1521, adopted March 17, 1980, approved at election June 3, 1980, repealed § 101.3 relative to increasing the number of wards of the City from 7 to 9 whenever the census data described in § 101.3 disclosed a population of 240,000 people. Said section had previously been amended by Ord. No. NS -1316, adopted Aug. 24, 1976, approved at election Nov, 2, 1976. Sec. 101.4. - Same— Notice and public hearing. Before making any change, modification or realignment of ward boundaries or numbers of wards, the City Council shall pass a resolution declaring its intention to make such changes. Such resolution shall set forth a convenient day, hour and place when and where any persons having any interest therein, or any objection to the making thereof, may appear before the City Council and be heard thereon. The City Council shall direct the Clerk of the Council to give notice by publishing said resolution once a week for two (2) weeks in the official newspaper prior to the date set for hearing. Said hearing in the event of increasing the number of wards shall be held not less than sixty (60) days prior to the succeeding general municipal election. In any event, not less than thirty (30) days 75A -3 Public Hearing: Consider New City Council Ward Boundary Lines December 19, 2011 Page 4 of 4 prior to the general municipal election, publication shall be made by map diagram in the official newspaper showing the new boundary lines of each and every ward. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Maria D. Huizar, Clerk of the Council Attachment 1 - Ordinance adopting proposed new boundaries Attachment 2 - Recommended Ward Map (Proposal #2 with current and proposed ward information) Attachment 3 - Proposal #1 with current and proposed ward information Attachment 4 — Correspondence received 75A-4 ATTACHMENT 1 75A -5 75A -6 ORDINANCE NO. NS -XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA, ANA CHANGING AND ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE WARDS OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, heretofore, on December 5, 2011, the City Council by its Resolution 2011 -087, declared its intention to change the boundary lines of the Wards in the City of Santa Ana, which said Resolution was regularly published as required by Section 101.4 of the Charter of the City of Santa Ana and gave notice of public hearing to be held on December 19, 2011; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That the boundaries of the wards of the City of Santa Ana are hereby changed and established as set forth on the map attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 1. Section 2: That the Clerk of the Council shall cause a map diagram showing the new boundary lines of each and every ward to be published in the Orange County Register not less than thirty (30) days prior to the general municipal election. ADOPTED this day of 12011 I.\»:Zf1T1 : I eI_%a to] go] VL I By: Melissa Crosthwaite Deputy City Attorney 75A -7 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS -XXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana City of Santa Ana Proposed Ward Redistricting 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Miles 75A -9 75A -10 ATTACHMENT 2 75A -11 Proposal 2 December 13, 2011 75A -12 EDINGER rICurrent Ward Boundaries Proposed Ward 1 City of Santa Ana Proposed Ward 2 Proposed Ward 3 Proposed Wards & Proposed Ward 4 Proposed Ward 5 Proposed Ward 6 Current Wards 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Miles 75A -13 75A -14 CITY MAP CURRENT AND PROPOSED WARD POPULATION 1G OEANGE COUNTY \1 5[Ai Of 05 'AT .1 Ni THE GOLDEN CITY EOUN DED 1669 75A -15 75A -16 fCi < U m V) bo f6 (n 4-J O U 4 .� U 4-J m � L Q Ln L 4- U O U U aJ Ca O CD a O IV Qm 0 Ja � o � o v E U E O U U 2 Q N �-{ 61 l ci N Q1 J U d G � N N CL O � Q U V, m i o a /-.4 V ■ 1 TOTAL Population rent 760 715 11!3961 691 Proposed DIM 53,097 4.60% 54,529 3.44% 54,7351._ - 6.74% 941 54,827 14.36% 025 53,512 - 2.75% 53,828 -9% Asian Current 2,827 Proposed Diff. 3,168 12.06% 1,269 1,015 - 20.02% 7,913 1,825 9,166 5,647 ! 15.8_3%1 209.4% 4,432 3,419 - 22.86_% -27% 15,352 11,203 City of Santa Ana Current and Proposed Redistricting Statistics Total Population Hispanic Current 44,087 Proposedl Diff. 44,296 j 0.47% 48,627 50,590 4.04% 36,200 32,803 -9.38% 44,373 42,794 346.1% 46,704 46,338 - 1.399/6 33,937 37,107 9% Black Current 333 Proposed '; Diff. 4751 42.64% 289 2771 -4.15% 816 667' - 18.26% 378 732 93.7% 616 587 1 -4.71% 7451 439' -41% White Current 2,979 Proposed Diff. 4,553 52.84% 2,251 2,347 4.26% 12,640 11,061 - 12.49% 1,111 4,956 346.1% 2,799 2,760 - 1.399/6 8,170 4,273 -48% Pacific Islander rrent 105 25 Proposed 108 Diff. 2.86% 33 32.00% 251 U 241 _3.98% 97 185 90.7% 101 2471 72 - 28.71 187 -24% Other including Nat. Am. Current Proposed ; Diff. 429 4971 - 13.68% 254 2671 -4.87% 871 T971, 9.28% 157 513 - 69.4% 373 236 58.0_5% 9451 6191 53% Ci7 1 00 TOTAL Population Current Proposed Diff.'. 15.64% 16.36% 4.60% 16.24% 16.80% 3.45 %. 18.09% 16.87% -6.74% 14.77% 16.89% 14.35% 8.05% 16.49% 2.77 %. -16.nl 18.30%1 16.59% ,- -9% Asian Current Proposed Diff.j 5.57% 5.97% 7.18 %1 2.41% 1.86% - 22.82% 13.48% 16.75% 24.26% 3.81% 10.30% 170.3% 8.05% 6.39% - 20.621% i 25.85% 20.81%1 -19% City of Santa Ana Current and Proposed Redistricting Statistics By Percentages Hisoanic Current 86.85% ^ Proposed Diff. 83.42% - 3.95% 92.25% 92.78% 0.57% © 61.68% 59.93% - 2.84% 92.56% 78.05% - 15.68% © 84.88%1 86.59% 2.01 67A4%1 68.94% 21 %1 Black Current Proposed Diff. 0.66% 0.89% 34.85% © 0.55% 0.51% - 7.27% 1.39% 1.22% - 12.23% 0.79% 1.34% 69.6% 1.12%1 1.10% -1.79% 1.25%1 0.82% -34% White Current Proposedj Diff. 5.87% _ 8.57 %1 46.00% © 4.27% 4.30%1 0.70% © 21.54% 20.21%1 -6.17% 2.32% 9.04 %1 289.7% ® 5.09% 5.16%1 1.38% 13.76% 7-94%1_______ -420/6 Pacific Islander Current 0.21 % Proposed Diff. - 4.76% 0.20% 0.05% 0.43% 0.06% 20.00% 0.44% 2.33% 0.20% 0.34% 70.0% 0.18% 0.13% - 27.78% 0.42% 0.35% -17% CITY MAP CURRENT AND PROPOSED WARD RE- BOUNDARY LINES i�un rd t0i �Illillllllllllllllll� �:: THE OOED EN CITY - FOUNDED 1869 75A -19 City of Santa Ana Ward Map Adopted March z, 9992 75A -20 City of Santa Ana Proposed Ward Redistricting 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Miles 75A -21 75A -22 WARD 1 CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS m O ODE OEANGE COUNTY 5 EAT OF GO [ OF THE GOLDEN CITY FOUNDED 1869 75A -23 Census 2010 Population C NM d1 ounce a, N - Current Wa Boundary E3 S B'B' a -i ST S T. S a E a 8 6 -.1 A B - /ER / RD le c -Ei- B a 0 El El 10 0: 0 a L-P a B < -A e -_ - _! 2B S S ED S _F E3 6 B I B El 11�,_: S 8 ' S I U.0 S go a S. a Ig El E) 1 S 13 El S 63 IS S _i7e@ :1 r_ E3 2 ED S E 163 ER B G S, 2 2 S 0 ❑ e B 9 B 13 B 1 2 813 E3 ! 6-3 I 9 M B Be - ------- El 63 -IS __ El B S, I lm m B G B B E p. U --o -El In . 2 9 El -.1 A 21 61 E3 '88 B S S'© 'B a El ,9 El E ' 8 63 8 188 G'9 �R�B'Sl 19 P A 0 a E - SI: A,t S E, WARN S -j— G 13 9 IS B 98 E B 0 8 8 B - /ER / RD le c IN PG E 1-Z A, V El S , , El El 10 0: 0 a L-P a B I 2 i - -A e -_ - _! 2B S S B S _F E3 6 B I B j 8 8 6 S 8 ' S I U.0 S go a S. a Ig El E) 1 S 13 El S 63 IS S _i7e@ :1 r_ 0 ED S E 163 ER B G S, 2 2 S 0 ❑ e B 9 B 13 B 1 2 813 E3 ! 6-3 I 9 21 61 E3 '88 B S S'© 'B a El ,9 El E ' 8 63 8 188 G'9 �R�B'Sl 19 P A 0 a E - SI: A,t S E, WARN S -j— G 13 9 IS B 98 E B 0 8 8 L o 75A-24 B - /ER / RD c a 6 El S S GE3, a 0 6 8 -S 813 B El 63 -IS __ El I lm m L o 75A-24 Proposed Ward Boundary -- m - m 171HS1 Q ° e e WASHING i ON AV Cb J° DR -L_ e ° ° NTA ANA BLVD ° o S I silo ° —_ L 7 ° } _ J M °� 0- -N AV +� O ° I ° ° ° CJ ° EDIP C� E' AV ° ° b Ell RD Pp o Q i . II _ate d Yj� Jql n 7�1'� yG� 75A -25 Census 2010 Population Council Ward 1 Ward 1 Percent of Total Pop 16.36% Ward Pop 53,097 Percent Hispanic 83.42% Percent White 8.57% Percent Asian 5.97% Percent Black 0.89% Percent Hw Pacific 0.20% 75A -26 TT•�� CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS CIO OlANGF COUNiY SiAi Oi (- OOVEINMfNi THE OOID EN CITY EOUN DED 1069 75A -27 F- 75A-28: Current Ward Boundary El o 8 Eq El E9 a a a s El 9H 8 o E3 8 H El 8 a H 2 Eg H H E3 o F-1 El 0 Eg Ee H 0 8 El 8 3 s e EE H EE a o EB 0 El ER E rTl E Eq E3 H EE Fl Tl El o 2 H S Eq S 0 0 H Eg 2B ED El 2 o a H H Eg H E 0 F- 75A-28: ENTER DR Proposed Ward Boundary ° ° a a ° WASHING � ®° Bn S ® a B ° g B B g p © B 9 ® B B � ° B B B ' B B B C3 a ° a E3 © B B © a B B B B3 e a B ° B B ° B :g 8 13 B B Q E3 ° B a B B :. B B B B ® 11 B a B SANTA ANA BLVD B B B B e a B ° B3 ® B B B B B B ° B B= B. B °'B B ® B B CI ° B B 9 B ° ® O D as ©© ° B B ° ®'eke BB B. BBB BB B: °j °0 °0 B °B ° v a o °° B is a a a a a e o ° ° B B a a B B a e B ° a o - - - -- r•-' B a a IS O B q< p a ° ° e e O a B o a° d a ° 2 ° ° ° ° B a ° a s r� o 13 IS (B El - -- = L1..1 o a _ _ a B a B a a a a a B IS B a B E3 Be 13 — E3 I' ST M a B ° a a a B 13 S a a ® B © B B B 0 ° ° a ICI _ a ® ° ® ®a ° ® a C3 B B ° e B B a Census 2010 Population B a -�N[ Council Ward 2 212 a B B ° B B B B a a B B �— O B, F'B a B ° aa8 B B B a a° 0 -- © 0 -- T-F­ x° B a B B °aa a B° a a© a ° B SOB B BB B B B- 19 E3 a i o ° — a o �. -i- B e °• B E3 E3 a a a 13 ® I C B B 8 a 75A -29 Ward 2 Percent of Total Pop 16.80% Ward Pop 54,529 Percent Hispanic 92.78% Percent White 4.309 Percent Asian 1.869 Percent Black 0.519 Percent Hw Pacific 0.069 :�E . i 75A -30 Census 2010 Population Council Ward 3 Ward 3 Percent—of Total_Pop 18.09% Ward—Pop 58,691 Percent — Hispanic 61.68% Percent—White 21.54% Percent—Asian 13.48% Percent—Black 1.39% Percent Hw Pacific 0.43% 4 o w°iao I� WESTMINSTER AV 2 J CO 1ST ST cc O Q MC FADDEN AV AV 9 F . w� o_ <L LL Boundary R _ _ i IL 7 I 1 1 � � � _ EDINGER AV 75A -32 \L.,' VETA AV � w cA U) GARDEN GROVE BLVD ° ° • • ° • C7 ° ° • • ° • ° ° Fki}�1 PAS °Etv AV W .r y9A`g1A CLARA AV ° ° • • o ° ° ° e • • ° ° ° ° [Y • ° ° • L- Co 17�H ST • 19TH S1' > .° Q ° WA. HINGTON AV rat° CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA BLVD 4T. 1STST R _ _ i IL 7 I 1 1 � � � _ EDINGER AV 75A -32 Census 2010 Population Council Ward 3 Ward 3 Percentof Total Pop 16.87% Ward Pop 54,735 Percent Hispanic 59.93% Percent White 20.21% Percent Asian 16.75% Percent Black 1.22% Percent Hw Pacific 0.44% MC FADDEN AV ]INGER AV )posed Ward Boundary H LA VETA AV w • ° e °4 GARDEN GROVE BLVD ° ° ° ° (D GA*PAVEPd AV ° od °> ° ° ° ° ° °� ...... ° ° ° ° SA TA CLARA AV ° U) O ° °° . ° ° • ° ° ° ti co o ° . ° 171H ST ro ° 19TH ST Q ° - ° /,I", � u WASHINGTON AV o1 CENTER DR �I SANTA ANA BLVD 1ST ST —STS iq < IIII Q _ I w 11 ~ � M F N V — 0 U) 75A -33 WESTMINSTER AV Lru ° LU .� ;0 m p 1ST ST o J m U lY w a = MC FADDEN AV ]INGER AV )posed Ward Boundary H LA VETA AV w • ° e °4 GARDEN GROVE BLVD ° ° ° ° (D GA*PAVEPd AV ° od °> ° ° ° ° ° °� ...... ° ° ° ° SA TA CLARA AV ° U) O ° °° . ° ° • ° ° ° ti co o ° . ° 171H ST ro ° 19TH ST Q ° - ° /,I", � u WASHINGTON AV o1 CENTER DR �I SANTA ANA BLVD 1ST ST —STS iq < IIII Q _ I w 11 ~ � M F N V — 0 U) 75A -33 75A -34 WARD 4 CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS O*ANGE COUNTY S11 O 00 E �. TAT NI /' , �}- T H E G 0 1 D E N CITY FOUNDED 1169 75A -35 ® Ll m iS m'l©a m MID m m m ® m m® lo- 19 m m, - ® ©® ® m m; , ® © o. ® o -m - mim M Ulm ilf !m M © m_ mo,m: MM © m !MIN m m - m .. -- m - m m, m. O 1 -m,' m ul ❑ p ®� m mm m . m o m m m'm m mom t•� m � a HARBOR` BLVD I IT ol n�a aa�a$ a MAiN ST n al o 3 � �v a c I FAiRVIEWST D < ., a n D ®• ��' �, CtZEEyGii E' T e — e m - 41�i�'� `�. �`A .rte•. • _ ° • BR"STOL' -6T' W m BRISTOL ST J�W s- GLOWER -6T EF MAiN ST n al o 3 � �v a WARD 5 CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS goo r OlANGE COUNTY TAi Of GOYf INN.ENT THE OOIDFN CITY FOUNDED 1969 75A -37 Current Ward Boundary Census 2010 Population Council Ward 5 GARDEN GROVE BI -VD Ward 5 Percent of Total_FOp 16.96Y. Ward Pop 55,025 am ...... Percent_Hfspank 84.88% P.,,.nt_Whfte 5.09% P.1,.nt_AV.n 8.05% q- 0 Percent slack 1.12% U.1 HAZARD AV U) Percent Hv_PacIflc OAR% U) U) rK e > > LL) S4ffFA AKIN BL!\/I) J 0 m U) 'T ' H ST n, U- ME" IT11-1 ST D am ...... "7TA",4INtr q- 0 U.1 HAZARD AV U) e MVIC'CENTER DR > S4ffFA AKIN BL!\/I) J 0 m n, 'T ' H ST w UJ -SANTA - ANA, fxd P n- m • Ic - 7+=- EN AV u- zu Census 2010 Population Council Ward 5 word P.r ... Of T-I P., 16497E .,,d P, 53,512 Per.. M Map.— "sm Percent W Ite &Is% Percent Alan 6.39% Portent slack 1.101{ P-- U P., nc min 0.17% :Tm 011,r n Mere Ra[!f 0306 GARDEN GROVE BLVD W > 0 1-- 0 J- VVL-6 177I-I ST ...... "7TA",4INtr U.1 HAZARD AV U) MVIC'CENTER DR 0 X 0 'T ' H ST w -SANTA - ANA, BI-`VD n- m • I SI ,I- V F rr_ 0 < 0 )EN AV LU (Y > U- cr. cn CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS LR �� OIANGE COUNTY SEAT Of THE GOLDEN CITY FOUNDED 1069 , 75A -39 Z m ° • ° ° EUCLIEI "• S-F y • n •'N- VHOPE Z a 'NARB @R' BLVD- ;- HARBOR BLb ... - . - . ..m- - ,• _ FAIRVIEW S i FAi � W ST 8 • ' RPZ r ST. • i - — IA — Vf ca rn L e e• '- -'—' r� ' R�8��3'R3 � I�11 BR °STOL• CT I- 'r!J - a s a • & 9 ° • _ . - d � FLOW ER ST - a• • iE x x x "i R R Ji a Flo n N z j Ali m Is s c= D < 3 i PIRR8OR- BLVD ° rn > ° ■ UCUD. V • q ■ a a > • a -�I m a cril m ■ z - • cD - a.■ a 9 ° ° m- R ni ST { r- $ ;� 0 i MC C� i A) Sc Q a ° . ;u \l. .° q m ■ ■ ■ ° a - • ° a • FAIRVIEW S'T - - . a ° ° • ° ° F Ig2Vi[3W ST m a' C m R ni ST { r- $ ;� 0 i MC C� i A) Sc Q a CURRENT AND PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS p JR. , ORANGE COUNfT SEAT OF OO'A INMFNI THE OOIDEN CITY FOUNDED 1069 75A-41 Ward Map �\ LA VETA AV W7 PcA o J m GARDEN GROVE BLVD 38 c7 43 61. W 0 ® MEMORY LN I jjl'AIRHAVEN AV 2 2% SANTA CLARA AV ® J o ® 3 ® z < LL o ¢ O I E m 17TH ST � 17TH ST 2 16 WASHINGTON AV ® < ® HAZARD AV 21 L D I a F y CIVIC CENTER DR L Q 28!& © SNSS U 5 3 SANTA ANA BLVD 6 4TH ST iSTST z ® 1STST ' 1ST ST m m CHESTNUT AV U O © m W MC FADDEN AV 2 > m LL a a ° ® a MC [ADDEN AV m a'. M FADDEN A C7 DINGER AV ti 51' 3 zo e` a' a 2 "y EDINGER AV EDINGER AV EDINGER AV ° L o a �m z rn a WARNER AV _ SEGERSTROM AV �. + �FJ mSEGERSTROM Ay ® R = 59 F ALTON AV S m MACARTH R BLVD ¢ PJ V f MACARTHUR BLVDm m © 4,0� N 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 �9c I I I -v 1 m 9�'yo -0 Miles SUN Council Wards and Neighborhoods SANTA ANA NEIGHBORHOODS 1. Logan 14. Thornton Park 27. Northwest 39. Riverview 52. Casa De Santiago 2. Floral Park 15. Bristol/ Warner 28. Flower Park 40. Bella Vista 53. Windsor Village North 3. Fairhaven 16. Laurelhurst 29. Morning Sunwood 41. Pico - Lowell 54. Concord 4. Washington Square 17. South Coast 30. Windsor Village 42. Santa Anita 55. Riverglen 5. French Park 18. Centennial Park 31. Park Santiago 43. Morrison /Eldridge Park 56. Edna Park 6. lacy 19. Sunwood Central 32. Fortola Park 44. West Grove Valley 57. Casa Bonita 7. Saddleback View 20. Mid -City 33. Shadow Run 45. Republic Homes 58. Meredith Parkwood 8. Heninger Park 21. Artesia Filar 34. Willard 46. New Horizons 59. Metro Classic 9. Eastside 22. Mar -Ies 35. Valley Adams 47. Madison Park 60. Lyon Street 10. Wilshire Square 23. Fisher Park 36. Central City 48. Cedar Evergreen Co-Op 61. Fairbridge Square 11. Santa Ana Memorial Park 24. Santa Ana Triangle 37. West Floral Park 49. Mabury Park 62. Grand Sunriso 12. Delhi 25. French Court 38. Bristol Memory 50. Rosewood Baker 63. Downtown 13. Sandpointe 26. Riverview West Coalition 51. Cornerstone Village 64. Young Square Copyright 2010, All Rights Reserved 2010 Neighborhood Associations Updated: 8 -18 -2010 75A -42 4`� ® LA VETA AV m c.j Proposed Ward Map J ° �c w o: m ® m m yep 5 � a GARDEN GROVE BLVD D RHAVEN AV _ 31 J SANTA CLARA AV ® D 0 ®3 z LL o WESI ¢ O \ m m 17TH ST Y 17TH ST Z WASHINGTON AV 3 HAZARD AV 0 2 I °¢' z y CIVIC CENTER DR I4 ¢ F u 3 5j`�S\'` a m¢ 3 O \v' SANTA ANA BLVD;, O 4TH ST ^-O 1 T T z Q ® 1ST ST 1 1ST ST m � O m tt CHESTNUT AV m 5 rn 36 a w w Mc FADDEN AV i © w m ®o ® < ® LL O e ° m a LL VC FADDEN AV � MC FA DEN AV O DINGER AV 4 < ? EDINGER AV DINGIER AV EDINGER AV „ o 16 LL WARNER AV I WARNER AV �y F o 1 m m 5 Q SEGERSTROM AV ¢. s SEGERSTROMAV Oy m �R9 _ F ® ALTON AV m J ACARTHUR BLVD ¢ \P MACARTHUR BLVDm m ,7 0� N 0.0 0.5 1.0 UNFL ER AV = 90 I I I m 9,pTyG� Miles U FL e�LO Proposed Council Wards and Neighborhoods SANTA ANA NEIGHBORHOODS 1. Logan 14. Thornton Park 27. Northwest 39. Riverview 52. Casa De Santiago 2. Floral Park 15. Bristol/ Warner 28. Flower Park 40. Bella Vista 53. Windsor Village North 3. Fairhaven 16. Laurelhurst 29. Morning Sunwood 41. Pico - Lowell 54. Concord 4. Washington Square 17. South Coast 30. Windsor Village 42. Santa Anita 55. Riverglen 5. French Park 18. Centennial Park 31. Park Santiago 43. Morrison /Eldridge Park 56. Edna Park 6. Lacy 19. Sunwood Central 32. Fortola Park 44. West Grove Valley 57. Casa Bonita 7. Saddleback View 20. Mid -City 33. Shadow Run 45. Republic Homes 58. Meredith Parkwood 8. Heninger Park 21. Artesia Filar 34. Willard 46. New Horizons 59. Metro Classic 9. Fastside 22. Mar -les 35. Valley Adams 47. Madison Park 60. Lyon Street 10, Wilshire Square 23. Fisher Park 36. Central City 48. Cedar Evergreen Co -Op 61. Fairbridge Square 11. Santa Ana Memorial Park 24. Santa Ana Triangle 37. West Floral Park 49. Mabury Park 62. Grand Sunrise 12. Delhi 25. French Court 38. Bristol Memory 50. Rosewood Baker 63. Downtown 13. Sandpointe 26. Riverview West Coalition 51. Cornerstone Village 64. Young Square Copyright 2011, All Rights Reserved Updated: 10 -11 -2010 75A -43 IRMM ATTACHMENT 3 75A -45 Proposal 1 December 5, 2011 75A -46 EDINGER ® Current Ward Boundaries Proposed Ward 1 Proposed Ward 2 Proposed Ward 3 Proposed Ward 4 Proposed Ward 5 Proposed Ward 6 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Miles City of Santa Ana Proposed Wards & Current Wards " 75A -47 CITY MAP CURRENT AND PROPOSED WARD RE- BOUNDARY LINES oEANCe couNn SEAT Of f{��� GOVEINMf Ni /� � THE ooEDEN CITY f o HN Dec Il69 . 75A -49 f6 G L f� C6 Q C� d-J V? 0 4J U 75A -50 Q 41 V) 4- 0 a A U 4-J V) Q} OC L Ca O QL 0 L u I� CITY MAP CURRENT AND PROPOSED WARD POPULATION kifi J,o ORANO! COVNIY Sf Ai Im OOYFINENI /1 E THE OOIGEN CITY FOUNDED 1469 75A -51 U Z H � U_ U N N U LSl � C � Q Z Q Q J cn a 0 0 a a O a '-.4 V ■ 1 W TOTAL Population Current osed DN 50,780 3,097! 4.60% 52,715 4,5291 3% 58,691 164,735 i .6.74 %1 47,941 3, 568 I 11.74 %! 55,025 5,160 0.25% 59,396 3,439 -10% Asian Currentl 2,827 1,269 Proposed 3,168 Diff., 12.08 %' 1,015 - 20.02 %'. _ 7,913 1,825 9,166 5,176 15.83%'. 183.6 %' 4,432 5,247 18.39 %', 15,352 9,846 W -36 %' City of Santa Ana Current and Proposed Redistricting Statistics Total Population Hispanic Current Proposedi DIM 44,087 48,627 36,200 44,296 0.47_% 4.04% - 9.38 %', 50,590 32,803 44,373 42,699 - 3.77 %I 46,704 46,028 - 1.45 %', 33,937 1 37,512 11 %, Black currentl Proposecil Diff. 2,347 475 42.64% _333 ~- 289 277 4.15% 816 667 - 18.26% 378 758 100.5% 616 514 - 16.56% 745 486 -35% White Current 21979 2,251 Proposed! 4,5531 Diff. 52.84% 1 4.26% 2,347 12,640 1,111 11,061 I 12.49% 4,231 1 280.8% 2,799.[77__2,932 497 4.75% 8,170 4,826 41% Pacific Islander Current Proposedi Di f. 105 108 2.86% r 25 331 32.00% 251 2411 -3.98% 97 207 113.4% 101 781 - 22.77% 247 159 -36% Other including Nat. Am. Current 429 Proposed 497`13.88% Dlff. 254 4.87 %' 871 _267 797 9.28 %1 157 497 - 68.4 %1 373 361, 3.32 %1 9451 610 55 %1 a, t 3 d a A c A IL 0 0 0 0 U pp N O 0) 00 F- N — M O fV M �- >T N o 0 0 0 0 0 64 co C a (M N o) D7 M 0 Q N N O co o) to 1� Co f- :° a rn G. L. (n c tcvI a n a a _ N N. ca U O tD N (O to aD CL ca a U w rn m rn to c m c U 13 0 o e� o 0 0 0 t( 00 a D �- v a ° e- 0 o a � M CO ~ to O co (O (O co fl. (o r r � Q A a° a J ++ 0 0 0 0 o t9 N O ^ 6) M F a 3 tCl (R OD V' (D t30 !U 75A -54 VAHMILM CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS OEAN3E COUNT' SLAT OF }� OOVFINMFNI THE OOEOFN CITY FOUNDFC IF69 75A -55 g Z' ol 0 0 I � .f.NI�S —AE d i d 0 of, C LQ • d. co 'It 0 A ;.. . I E- Elf ra r w 5E, CL ■ go 'Xis.0's A -94 -J. Lu 0 Avmclvoaa is < V% i t is lult5tb8 < F- L I — lr�. is of, C LQ • d. co 'It 0 A ;.. . I E- Elf ra r w 5E, CL ■ go 'Xis.0's A -94 I WARD 2 CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS munm�nnnw, ,� p�IIIJII�llllllll.� l" 75A -57 ,a 'a "a d) 0 0 CLM 0 iL L p ® m m m l u 3 3 C 6 e E CL irb, C, —E T m m 0 u 0 GO Eq co m = LE ED M go, ED Ea a m w ID V 23 M .1 pm 'Mmoulum m m M rj Ir C9 19 'a rE m mvm a) Is M(E m 9) of c 91 0 = ID 91 Ma m ul lil 0 pm m G) CE 04 Elm (E CD ro M m E M p a:. ID C-L p . . . . .. m m v m m m fm Ig gi IM m W u 15 E9 m 1-9 G tj QD vi ar LE Im in CE 0 Cl (D p m 19 rj m 12 m o rj Ir 19 WARD 3 CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS ! kii �J y .- -ANOE COUN IY 1� SEAT Oi 0 SEAT 0' N! /1 0 THE OOID EN CITY FOUNDED 1069 75A -59 a -4 0 A. u c u MOVONa • ..b AlO UOSVV� .9 •3,- BN IOA -60 IW IS M3!Ak!['A -- gr I m IR • 13AIS W68VH J1 AV. CNITAI 14 1 islinsvis is dQpw,*L og< AYM(Nods % *J.Slba -4i 1 tD Is a -4 0 A. u c u MOVONa • ..b AlO UOSVV� .9 •3,- BN IOA -60 IW IS M3!Ak!['A -- gr I m IR • 13AIS W68VH J1 AV. CNITAI a -4 0 A. u c u MOVONa • ..b AlO UOSVV� .9 •3,- BN IOA -60 IW IS M3!Ak!['A • 13AIS W68VH AV. CNITAI islinsvis is dQpw,*L a -4 0 A. u c u MOVONa • ..b AlO UOSVV� .9 •3,- BN IOA -60 IW IS M3!Ak!['A AV. CNITAI islinsvis SS NAv,.- og< % *J.Slba tD Is a -4 0 A. u c u MOVONa • ..b AlO UOSVV� .9 •3,- BN IOA -60 IW IS M3!Ak!['A WARD 4 CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS -A—e cou— OOVEINMENr /I E THE Got"EN CITY E011N0E0 1069 75A -61 ,a CIS 0 CL 0 0 ED CL CIS ,13 r 0 L) 2 lkVj%ALC_VMlS 7-M _!J L,c:t a ce r. 4P 44 Lul R: 5 LLI LEJ IS AA� fM�; v 7, IWLICf) Ul W" 0 �a 4 tt Lq C/) I ISS.M -is floisil Q If 0 m IM m 01 10 1 sl�AEI L Re z IN: w rt 19 m _Ls 41 va IS LLVVId -TIE m S° m q w ID W ul C-1 IN 75 -62 WARD 5 CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS JIG OIAU^.E COUNty 5 [A} OS GoVEtNkENt ' THE GOLDEN CITY EODNCEO IE69 75A -63 m Nr-' V1=0FE ST S a Z - .9 . 0 p m 0 a m0° e 3 m ^ Vq FAA FAIRVIEW ST m Lpm a° Cn ` __• m m a e_ �o o e m�+m m m mo m ° ° -BRISTOL CT °m m °m msam m m aka °° ° IVL ,� I I i I` VE^ -! OVVER ST i G7 a o � ° m v =AIRVI EVV ST ° FAIRVIEW ST m m — — m BRISTOL ST CL c C"VVER ST ° b ° e u V -� 7 0 )-t r W= O c � 3 3 Q C m C CL v Q1 O 0 0 a N Q Q at � CL CURRENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND STATISTICS w OlAN'v! COUNTY SCAT OE f-F�� GOVE tIlMENI /� � THE 0OtDEN CITY FOUNDED 1669 75A -65 v CuCLIL. Si �s N ° rl j it c ' '• • C^1 ti SE ao n t: m En G n � C O i C 7 a� m Q. O o '° 0 O C N 9a7 a `G d O. > P .NE ° ° G HOPE m< KARBOR, BLVD ° i ,,A.RBOR 5L4/ C. . M. - - .0 AN EW ST - r = a 1 !� FAIR Cl) D ■ [ ; + : I W ST RA 1�1 —� v �r .. • I _ ST 3R?STOL ST • e - tLOWtR ST � _rid -- RrL WER ST o v CuCLIL. Si �s N ° rl j it c ' '• • C^1 ti SE ao n t: m En G n � C O i C 7 a� m Q. O o '° 0 O C N 9a7 a `G d O. CURRENT AND PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS ILp OFANGF COUNTY GO VEINMFNi /� F I GOLDEN C111 FOUNDED 116? 75A -67 u 5 O a; U ��� F g Y V N N N N u•. N Un19 n9 L" 90BMU V ai YCtlpl e F o RCFC 5 [�' hrea C� �, S F & 4 Sti rya.° [W t nv O,vb9 °b ILI 4' ! N u ,r..w.ow "'^* Ll .4 b 9 3 3 8 6 c p0 � p LW uvaaz ' 15 b19e9 9 XLgW H (�V� � � G � y m � •7 6 F � .Y4 a Y LO Lo \\` ® L:•iw9Y, �, - � � U ��� F g Y V N N N N u•. N Un19 n9 L" 90BMU V ai YCtlpl nvxusni � a rya.° [W t °b ILI 4' ! N u �le� LW uvaaz Lo a�, L:•iw9Y, �, - � � +v exisr w•a aicrtr � 75A -68 Oy� °m uv ci"i.° •'icuu u up, C F V N p M° - - - - - - - c.0 Q c c N Ui .. 5 It - _u pC � � z N _z F� � niay.�2�cv�a u ^ u ATTACHMENT 4 "Pl"N. 75A -70 Huizar, Maria From: Thomas A Gordon Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 20118:36 AM To: Huizar, Maria Cc: Pulido, Miguel; Benavides, David; Walters, Paul; Lawrence, Mark Subject: Re: Census Tract info requested - T. Gordon Ms Huizar, I requested other info besides the info you provided, most of which is not available on the link you sent as it splits census tracts and neighborhood associations. Please consider this as my formal request to call for several public meetings in conjunction with neighborhood associations and CommLink to ensure fairness, transparency and public involvement in the process of ward re- alignment for voters prior to placing it on the December 19, 2011 Santa Ana Council Agenda. Respectfully, Thomas Anthony Gordon On Dec 12, 2011, at 10:36 AM, "Huizar, Maria" <MHuizar @santa- ana.org> wrote: Mr. Gordon, pursuant to your request for information dated December 8th, attached is the document responsive to your request. If you have any questions, please give us a call. This information is freely available from the Census Bureau FactFinder website, at http: / /factfinder2.census.gov/ faces /nav /jsf /pages /index.xhtmI Maria D. Huizar, Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 714 647 -6520 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Thomas A Gordon Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 12:15 PM To: Huizar, Maria Subject: Census Tract info requested Ms Huizar, Please consider this my formal request for information. Would you be so as to provide info such as population numbers, ethnicities, etc for census tract 741.09, which I understand is the area bound by Warner, Raitt, Segerstrom and Greenville. 1 75A -71 I'm hopeful that you will provide census data for other areas currently within ward 4 that border ward 6 such as Sullivan to Fairview and Willits to McFadden as well as Sullivan to Raitt and McFadden to Edinger as well as census data on areas and neighborhoods within the Warner to Edinger and Fairview /Greenville to Raitt proposed transfer from Ward 4 to Ward 6. I appreciate your time and look forward to your reply. Respectfully, Thomas Anthony Gordon < Census Tract 741- 09.pdf> z 75A -72